[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password
(For post deletion)

New farmhands wanted, click to apply!

File: 1683862848620.jpeg (356.37 KB, 1994x1329, flower crown cow.jpeg)

No. 57065

Previous thread: >>>/meta/54138

No. 57081

>>57080
This topic is ridiculous.
Forgot the posts, samefag isn't quoting every post they make, but is trying to continue the pedo discussion and blames anons for being okay with "strangers talking to kids". It's such a bait topic. They might as well be yelling "WHITEKNIGHT" as usual, but due to a ban a few days ago, anon isn't.
>>>/w/296542
>>>/w/296497
>>>/w/296486
>>>/w/296472

No. 57102

File: 1683915180827.jpg (453.06 KB, 1074x3310, HK98mdB.jpg)

Can a mod please make a new radfem cows thread? Phemoids milk is getting spilt and she is tweaking put.

No. 57104

File: 1683915233541.jpg (137.23 KB, 1080x1034, zFyV5my.jpg)


No. 57105

Please pin the new doodle thread >>>/ot/1575242

No. 57123

>>57105
Thank you jannies!

No. 57134

Would it be possible to make it so we can embed youtube shorts without manually altering the url?

No. 57137

>>56798
There's an obvious bias towards Chris and Sharla. I don't know why anons keep denying it. Anons flipped out because someone said that another jvloggers vanlife vid was better than Sharla's. >>55155
>>55231 >>55259

An anon also tinfoiled that the thread is full of small jvloggers that are salty >>55234

And as this anon said >>55263 >>55271 whenever there's any criticism of Chris, the anon is accused of being a salty jvlogger.

No. 57139

>>57137
Coming to /meta/ because you're mad about another anon's complaints is pretty lame.

No. 57141

>>57139
Hello and welcome to /meta/, that is actually primarily what this board is for actually. When you think rules are broken and you have already reported in the past without anything happening you link the comments here.
So unless you can actually point out how the rules aren't broken in those comments don't come here to white knight yourself.

No. 57143

File: 1683934986581.png (39.57 KB, 863x682, Screenshot_20230513-014112.png)

It's kind of weird to see the alleged cow poster or fake cow poster get banned for not sageing, and then the poster below them get banned for "hi cow." Is it hi cow when the person who posted actually claims to be the cow (as was the case here)? Why not ban for bait taking if that's what the actual offense is (allegedly)?

No. 57144

>>57143
The interaction is very hi cowing. Pretending an anon is a cow and going along with it is derailing and obvious bait.

No. 57147

blaine in /ot/'s dumbass shit thread >>>/ot/1571598

No. 57151

Possible CP in /m/

No. 57152

>>57151
Now the moid is spamming the mtf thread. Ban the shitbag

No. 57197

can a mod please ban the infighters in jvlog? posts like these do nothing for discussion
>>>/w/296705
>>>/w/296569

these are samefagging:
>>>/w/296625
>>>/w/296626

and these
>>>/w/296550
>>>/w/296552
possibly >>>/w/296553

No. 57207

>>57197
That's not samefagging and your infighting over anons not sharing your same veiw and derailing about kids in thumbnails. Stfu about it already, and again, massively embarrassing to see you not clock same posts as samefagging bc one is mine, you retard. It's been 3 days. No one gives a fuck about Pearl's videos, talk about Pearl-clutching. Is the concept that multiple anons hate this forced milk such a strange idea for you? Get over it. Your milk sucks and those videos are over a year old now. If the kids in the video were really an issue, you would've brought this up last year instead of nitpicking cups in apartments.

No. 57212

>>57207
none of this sperging justifies infighting, derailing, or shitposts and i'm ntayrt so save your splutter

No. 57214

>>57212
Not agreeing with you is not infighting and the derailing is from the kid obsesed anon posting stats for google searches and blaming anons, but you're weirdly not quoting those.

No. 57217

>>57214
In the first couple I cited clear infighting, where nothing other than insults were lobbed at some anon.

I didn't see any stats, link the post so people know what you are talking about.

No. 57249

>>57217
Not agreeing isn't infighting

No. 57250

File: 1684002992341.jpg (133.3 KB, 1080x1532, Screenshot_20230513_113709_Chr…)

>>57197
Nice shitposting bc you're mad

No. 57252

Racebaiting male poster is back in /ot/.

No. 57253

>>57250
ayrt. I just reported all those, literally as "shitpost non-con"

No. 57260

Hi farmhands, petition to lock the jvlog thread for similar reasons you recently locked the Belle thread.
My reasoning being; there is no actual milk, everything gets derailed, people bait and non farmers (I.E twitterfags) fight it.
Before Chris and Sharla that thread was dead - there is nothing new in the jvlogging world since that milk.
The whole thread is nothing more than an extension of the abroad in Japan subreddit and (I hope) I’m not the only one who is fed up of that shit bringing moids here.
Also I would like to point out that the few times I have asked for the thread to be autosaged it has been met with absolute rage by people who don’t even know what that means (I.E newfags and redditors)

I’m not trying to gatekeep a potentially milky topic, however I do think this has gone on too long. This isn’t PULL, this isn’t someone’s personal blog. Since when was lolcow a fucking haven for SJWs? Can we just stop this bullshit please?

No. 57261

>>57260
This. I said it months ago, that they should move to the youtube thread. There is barely any milk at all and anons keep forcing it.

No. 57266

>>57065
>>>/ot/1576944

romanianon again

No. 57268

>>57260
"sjws"
cringe
wtf is wrong with you

No. 57269

>>57253
at least they are actually posting images ffs, that thread has just devolved into anons reeeeeing about pointless nonsense like kids in thumbnails being a fucking capital crime.

No. 57271

>>57269
I think people just hate Pearl and find her actions retarded and borderline creepy in general. That's relevant to the thread and nothing to get all upset about. unless you have some reason to get angry on behalf of someone calling herself "Oriental Pearl" and pretending she's hot shit wherever she goes.

If anything this outrage about some points anons made is far more derailing than people saying Pearl behaves shittily. Because she does.

No. 57272

>>57268
Go back

No. 57273

>>57272
eat lunch

No. 57274

>>57271
It's not milk to derail about.

No. 57275

>>57197
done, thanks for this

No. 57276

>>57275
Is the sperg already ban evading? >>>/w/296778

No. 57279

>>>/w/296778
>>>/w/296680
>>>/w/296472
Can a mod please ban the above nonstop blogging anon in Jvlog who spergs literal paragraph after paragraph harping endlessly on why she's the authority on what's appropriate for Japanese children? And for some reason relentlessly attacking other anons for something having to do with a camera shutter? Seriously this anon is unhinged and deserves a life ban. She's the driving force behind 99% of the last 24 hours of Oriental Pearl nightmares in Jvlog

No. 57282

>>57279
The ones you've linked have been dealt with already. fyi, they are also different people. Please don't assume just because people have the same opinion about something, they are the same person.

No. 57284

>>57282
I'm pretty sure she was the same anon, probably just jumping around on a VPN

No. 57286

>>57284
no. only one was using a vpn, and we have ways to check.

No. 57288

>>57286
Nta, but if that's the case I'm going with my original theory of a discord group due to how chatroom-y it gets sometimes. It was very noticeable last summer and a few anons mentioned it. Thank you for handling it!

No. 57289

is anyone else having a bug where the sparkly buttplug cursor shows up even when they're not on /shay/?

No. 57290

>>57289
What's yours doing?

No. 57310

>>57289
Have you tried cleaning out cookies for the site?

No. 57313

>>57268
>cringe
Pot meet kettle

No. 57329

Rancefag is now posting selfies in the husbando thread. Mods please ban her before we get another meltdown.

No. 57337

Anon is so special, they don't get that bushes called oriental are off topic. This is so derailing >>>/w/296852

No. 57338

Hi farmers!
Farmhand applications are still open, if you want to support LC we encourage you to take a look (or a second look) at the application. It is linked at the top of this page. Once we have enough farmhands onboarded, Hellweek will be upon us. General reminder: a post not being redtexted doesn’t necessarily mean that no ban was issued. The poll results are 70.06% to restrict and 29.94% to not restrict. The new rule regarding shota and loli is "Discussion and images should only be permitted if it is related to milk, and NSFW images must be heavily censored. All images must be spoilered." This will be added to the rules once exact wording has being agreed on between staff.

>>56628
>>56630
>>56412
>>56416
>>56630
>>56637
>>56685
It’s easy to simplify things down to “just moderate the infighting” and I understand why it seems like the best solution. We are hoping that by setting rules for shota/loli that bans will be more consistent as our stance will be clear, and bans can happen before the inevitable infighting and discourse begins.

>>56650
Many such posts have been reported with “shota” as the reason. Hence, the need we saw to define a clear rule.

>>56447
This poll was made and the rule is up for discussion because we have no rules specifically for shota or loli. The topic is controversial, all it takes is a recent scroll through /meta/ to see this (see >>56440, kek).
>Why do it here?
I don’t know. But we need a way to approach anons who do post shota here, hence the poll.

>>56676
>>56666
>>56702
>>56674
>>56726
>>56956
Staff has come up with a general consensus of shota (and loli) as a specific art style within anime that focuses on prepubescence and is often sexual/pedophilic in nature. Minor characters in anime are common because minors are a large demographic for anime, so images of Naruto (13) and Inuyasha (14) will not be banned because they do not fit the definition of being illustrated in a way that sexualizes prepubescence. That being said, we can only define a term down so far. At some point it gets so muddy it’s not worth discussing anymore, and bans must be decided on a case-by-case basis. This poll gives us a blanket rule that will apply to most posts.

>>56668
Yes, banning of certain topics has been a problem in the past, i.e. pinkpill, manhate, 2X, even Shayna was banned at some point. Imo, loli/shota is not comparable to those topics. However, going forward we will be cautious about banning topics outright.

>>56621
Results from this poll will not negate other site rules. Spam is not allowed, and won’t be allowed after the poll ends, regardless of results. From the poll’s description as well: “In all cases any discussion and/or imagery must be on topic or it will be bannable. Any images featuring extreme content will always be bannable and will most likely result in a permanent ban (e.g. gore, bestiality, torture, distress)”

>>56307
Please see definitions as outlined by the poll: “ Not loli/shota: anime images of minors that are not sexual and/or romantic.” >>56351 also explains it well.

>>56349
CP is deleted as quickly as possible with a small team running lc. Decide yourself whether loli is too offensive for your sensitive eyes.

>>56442
>>56459
As has been mentioned, we are a small team. The line between derailing and discussion can get muddy, but we are doing our best! Since anons have asked for site statistics, here are the stats for the last 30 days (rounded down):
>Page views: 10.5m
>Total posts: 59k (including deleted posts)
>Unique poster IPs: 16.5k
>Unique poster devices: 11k
Note that the numbers above do not represent the actual number of unique posters. The real number will be lower, as every session with a VPN will count as a new IP/device, and some farmers will obviously use multiple devices (e.g. PC and phone).

>>56444
Blaine has very little pull on social media, having 41 followers and little interaction. As of May 11, this tweet has been unpinned from his profile and has 160 views, 1 retweet and 3 likes. Again, we watched the poll numbers and determined the poll was not compromised.
>>56380
>>56394

>>56300
>>56364
See >>56625

>>56642
Kiwi bunker has been locked. Further kiwi threads will be locked. If kiwifags would like to use LC, they need to integrate and not announce themselves.

>>56994
>>56996
I understand that it’s possible for staff to shitpost and unban themselves and such, but if this even happens at all, it does NOT happen often, and we do occasionally check moderation logs ourselves to see what's been done, but you can't expect us to fully do this every single time. We get 120-140 reports every 14-16 hours, and with the team as small as us, and this being a completely volunteer thing from everyone, it's an extremely unreasonable ask.

>>57018
Yes.

>>56847
That was not a ban issued by an admin. It was incorrect and the staff who issued it has been informed.

>>56973
We have plans to amend the rules to be more specific about things that have become issues on the farm. Staff deletes posts extremely sparingly and is usually done for users with no real post history who are trolling or spamming. Some deleted posts are deleted by the user, which they can do within 30 minutes of posting. What do you mean by feedback?
>Banning with no redrext also signals to other anons that the content is acceptable to post, so I think implementing a policy of redtexting when possible would be best.
This is fine, but constant redtext makes a thread look unwelcoming and can put off some users. For hellweek, we will redtext every ban so we can get user feedback. I understand what you mean, and sometimes when issuing bans we do get the same posts reported because the post wasn’t redtexted. I’d like to hear farmers’ feedback about what they think about redtext!

>>56806
>I am just begging mods to read these threads, check post histories, and get a proper understanding of what's really going on here because I don't believe they do.
We would love to do this, and do it when we are able. Our current issue is that we:
>Have a small staff
>Receive 120-140 reports per 24hrs with over 50% of those including vague or blank reasons for the reports
>"infighting" as report reason begs a 15 minute investigation into the thread of origin
>"moid" "tranny" reasons with no context in the post also beg a thorough investigation
>Continue to receive reports and the one or two of us fielding them have to decide whether we will thoroughly investigate each one like we want to, or whether we should quickly issue bans for things that seem obvious.
For the amount of reports we get, it’s so much more time efficient for the reporter to give a thorough reason when reporting, or come to meta and give us a quick run down of what’s been happening. I really appreciate farmers who complain with linked posts and an explanation of why they think a ban is warranted! This isn’t necessary for things like sage bans, but is endlessly helpful when there are recurring bad actors in threads that I’m just not familiar with

No. 57342

>>57337
it wasn't off topic, it was addressing a comment about Oriental Pearl's name you festering sphincter

No. 57365

>>57338
I like that shotafags are being reigned in without shutting down potential discourse relating to milk in the future. Thanks admins

No. 57385

>>57342
No one needs a backstory on the term. That's derailing.

No. 57386

>>57385
now you're derailing and infighting in meta? what's wrong with you

No. 57387

File: 1684122160944.jpg (71.96 KB, 736x736, yea.jpg)

Soo.. ever think about raising the age limit to 20+?

No. 57388

>>57387
You’re over the age of 20 and use anime reaction images, focus on yourself.

No. 57389

File: 1684122626904.png (36.78 KB, 422x271, tumblr_inline_p5tey9gqz71t9e2z…)

>>57388
Nta. You're the immature one.(Blaine again)

No. 57391


No. 57392

Scrote spamming racebait in snow altcows thread.

No. 57393

Anal rectal violence scrote in ot.

No. 57396

>>57391
Correct.

No. 57397

>>>/ot/1577953
Butthurt scrote crying because 1 year ago someone in the YouTube hate thread posted about moids on YouTube comments who bring up their "issues" on videos about women's issues.

No. 57398

>>57397
jfc how many times do you need to rewrite the same moronic post

No. 57399

>>57388
People over the age of 20 make the content you like to consume. Rancefag being 18 made me think about this which is why I posted that.

No. 57406

File: 1684126798415.png (18.76 KB, 1226x366, 1651762805627.png)

Please add how to embed youtube shorts to the info page.

No. 57409

File: 1684127785353.jpg (60.78 KB, 619x826, Screenshot_20230514_221606_Chr…)

>>57389
blaine, you're so obvious when you post kek fuck off tranny

No. 57410

>>57398
AYRT, the site glitched out dumbass, I deleted the repeats (the first time I deleted because fucking autocorrect changed ot to or so the post quote didn't work)

No. 57411

Lots of chatroom type derailing in jvlog

No. 57412

>>57411
that thread keeps being brought up in /meta/ so I finally took a look and there is so much samefagging, shitposting, and general autism with little to no milk. wtf is going on in there? even for /w/ standards its beyond awful

No. 57413

>>57411
>>57412
I think someone or a group wants the thread locked because they have an agenda (like a friendship or parasocial relationship with one of the main subjects). They are shitposting and trying to make the whole thread terrible in order that mods lock it. So while it's currently an awful thread, imho it's better to focus on moderating it & banning the morons shitting it up vs. shutting down a thread that actually has had recent milk in it. Anytime people are clamoring for a thread to be locked, I find it suspicious tbh. Personally if a thread is boring or annoying, I just stop reading it. I can't understand insisting it get locked or censored unless there's some personal reason, you know? Belle's thread has been locked, and it sets a dubious precedent, but in that case the moid infestation was also high. I don't see any reason to lock other threads based on what happened there.

I'm not saying this bc I think the two posts I'm replying to have an agenda (I don't think that), just because the prospect of locking the thread was brought up earlier. Like no, dumping all jvloggers into a general YT thread is dumb. Just like dumping Lili, whose whole schtick is being "uwu model injured in Japan" and who is surrounded by jvloggers raising tens of thousands of dollars for her, into a dead munchie thread makes no sense either. Actually since we don't know if she's munching, it's also a bit weird. I do think she's being disingenuous and collecting a huge amount of money for surgery/treatments she may never have any intention of getting. She belongs more with jvloggers than with general munchies imho.

No. 57418

>>57413
I am someone who wants the thread locked but for the reasons I said, I don’t have an agenda nor am I conspiring with other people.
I don’t have a vendetta or a parasocial relationship with any of them.
The thread has been taken over by reddit/Twitter users, pure and simple.
Let’s be 100% honest here, the only vloggers people mention are Chris and Sharla and whoever they associate with. Everyone else only gets a post if something happens (Micaela pregnancy for example, and now potentially the munchie stuff).
I agree that the thread has become more of shitposting chat room, it never used to be like that. I understand things are allowed to change, and I think the fact that the thread is titled ex jvloggers is part of the problem. That and people seem to think that threads can’t lay dormant until something actually happens (again, probably down to the fact everyone is from Reddit)
Something needs to change, that is for sure.

No. 57419

>>57413
The thread sucks. Stop with all the conspiracies to justify it.

No. 57420

>>57338
Thank you Admin, it must be annoying to deal with all this stuff.

No. 57430

Nose autist in Jvlog is off her meds, obsessed with Sharla's nose

No. 57433

>>57430
They sanefagging still? They are trying to lock it with spam. They constantly do this.

No. 57436

>>57413
>>57418
If we were from reddit, there would be real whiteknighting. Not derailing about noses and, like mods redtexting, not constantly samefagging with the same spergout posts nitpicking them. Fans don't nitpick the way the thread does lol The logic just isn't there that it's from reddit. Someone goes to reddit and spams the thread with their takes which dont even matter to the thread because we don't need other sute opinions on shit, might as well have bedn posting PULL and KF takes too which anons don't because it's fucking stupid to bring up a different.

I've seen the pattern. It's not whiteknights or stans or fans. Anons just want to shitpost, they enjoy the infighting and derailing, and it's worse every time one of them can't manipulate the OP with stupid shit.

No. 57442

CP/Porn spam in the coquette thread

No. 57443

>>57442
Also in m and gross troon nude in meta

No. 57444

>>57442
>>57443
please report them. I am not seeing them and they aren't in the logs.

No. 57445

>>57444
Just noticed they were deleted! Thank you farmhand!.

No. 57446

>>57436
what is this word salad? I can't understand it at all

No. 57447

>>57418
I see the farmhands nipping the derailing and samefagging in the bud. Thanks! I think this is a good way to handle this thread for the time being - heavy moderation until people learn how to not act like retards.

No. 57448

>>57447
I also agree with heavy moderation, and heavy on what is milk too. It has to be good, not crap about what sex toys someone bought or didn't buy. The low effort posting is a reason to kick it off it keeps up. I want to have discussions but when its about stupid things its no contribution to the thread. Like with Belle, just random updates that aren't milky degrade the thread.

No. 57452

>>57447
I loved seeing that non-contributory redtext. We don't need to treat threads like Discord, sometimes nothing is happening and a thread is dormant. Jvloggers are never going to reach Shayna heights of insane shitposting, because the subjects are really pretty boring, but damn if some anons didn't seem to be trying to force a new /jvlog/ board with their inanity.

No. 57455

John Daub shitposting in Jvlog again

No. 57456

>>57455
It's been going on since last year that these idiots do this shitposting .

No. 57457

>>57448 you're right.
I think we should just close /w/ all together and /pt/, they are dead catalogs. and most /snow/ threads too because none of them are milky and they all reek of autism. It's all just nitpicking and stale milk, nothing that really justifies having all these threads and catalogs for the mods to maintain. Because who is really milky these days? Not most cows on this site that's for sure just endless nitpicking and vendetta posting

No. 57458

>>57457
Yeah nonny and while we're at it let's just close the whole site. Good idea.

No. 57459

>>57458
I'm fine with that

No. 57460

Ban evading sperg complaining that they can't shitpost >>>/w/297024 bc mods are so eenie-meanie.

No. 57462

>>57457
/pt/ is fine and how threads should be. They shouldn't be updated every hour when nothing is happening and just spamming photos. /w/ needs threads closed and allocated to /snow/ tbh.

No. 57463

>>57457
Are you new?

No. 57464

attention whoring retard is currently spamming /ot/ with selfposts

No. 57465

>>57464
No, it's the "you whores" moid who is obsessed with some girl and spamming LC.

No. 57466

>>57465
he's one spergout from skinwalking her and chopping his cock off, probably.

No. 57468

File: 1684228005845.png (50.4 KB, 474x453, Die moid.png)

>>57467

No. 57472

>>57468
stop engaging retard

No. 57475

>>57473
Shut up oh my god.

No. 57476

Retarded nose sperg is back with bad bait >>>/w/297045

No. 57477

>>57476
>>>/w/297050

No. 57478

>>57476
>>57477
Genuinely really appreciate moderation these past few days!!

No. 57479

>>57478
Me too. These posters remind me of the cup spergs and the greece obsessed anons too.

No. 57480

I have a suggestion.
If anons want to discuss Sharla's nose, and make fan pics of it, they should be allowed to do so without being complained about constantly. Sharla has a gorgeous nose and there shouldn't be restrictions placed on it. It's unruly and retarded to try to silence anons who want to celebrate its elegant slope.(schnoz chan, stop trying to make this happen, it's not going to happen.)

No. 57481

>>57480
Lord only nose why you're so opposed to Sharla's perfect nose

No. 57482

Lovely ski jump nose
Perched on her angelic face
Sharla's beauty stuns

No. 57483

In profile or straight
Like a cascade of sunlight
A nose of true grace(samefagging)

No. 57484

>>56287
>Could you link some of her posts so I can take a look?
Late as fuck and I think she might already be banned for now, but here's some more obvious recent examples

>>>/ot/1578813
>>>/ot/1579143
>>>/ot/1579146
>>>/ot/1579149
>>>/ot/1579171
>>>/ot/1579172
>>>/ot/1579199
>>>/ot/1579417
>>>/ot/1579419
>>>/ot/1579420
>>>/ot/1579433
>>>/ot/1579437
Basically look out for anyone typing like a deranged boomer.

No. 57485

Just to ask again, is the mod sure this isn't someone not even using a VPN but maybe samefagging by going into different wifi cell ranges? >>>/w/297081

With the amount of bans, there's no way this is continuously new people.

No. 57488

>>57485
they'll get board eventually

No. 57492

Can we make Nigelposting illegal outside of specific threads having to do with relationships. I'm so tired of normies in cow threads being like "omg I showed my bf shayna and he said she was GROSS LOLOLOL" It adds nothing to the discussion except a bunch of bait replies

No. 57493

>>57484
Trump chan has grown on me but maybe mods could just give her a ban to tell her she doesn't have to reply to every post? Or to maybe just post less because it feels like she's treating the celebricows thread like it's supposed to be some continuous conversation where she has to say something every 20 minutes. They should also direct her sights to the dumbass shit thread if she wants to post a lot of nonsense, she would thrive there

No. 57495

>>57484
She's still around.

No. 57500

Ban evading in jvlog again

No. 57503

>>57492
Well that person got banned so yeah, its already against the rules

No. 57505

Is it just me or has this damn multipost diarrhea glitch become more common? I swear it's been happening more often in the past couple weeks. Please fix that shit (if you can, of course).

No. 57507

Really think mods should rethink the Jvlog thread existing. Look at the milk, nothing has really been 'milky' or 'controversial' in over a year with any of them. The best we have is a dating announcement with no proof of cheating and a nose job for Mikan.

No. 57508

>>57507
Just to add, with the lack of milk on all of them, Mikan shouldn't have another thread if it's made, it's just nitpicking her hair that filled up the last thread besides far between sperging on twitter which was rarely updated tbh between nitpicks. Kota is in the same vein of irrelevancy. Out of all those YouTubers, Venus is the only one in Japan with continuous milk. Otherwise, really think anons should take these cows to /snow/ at this point. I know admin said Lily shouldn't be over there, but collectively they all should be. Most of the content from all of them has become shitposting.

No. 57509

>>57507
>>57508
haha nice try. There's been jvlog milk despite a group trying to drown it out with shitposts. Mikan is a salty bitch, why shouldn't she get discussed? Kota's thread is a legacy and it's not going anywhere. Stop trying to control what other people discuss provided it is within the rules of the site. "no milk" for more than a year, lmao! So what would be milk to you?

The current shitposters need bans. The thread should not get locked because deranged stans want to spam.

No. 57510

>>57509
I think what we’re all trying to say is that there is very little milk for all of the threads that have been made over the past year or so. The quality of posts is awful; we now have some weirdo obsessed with Sharla’s nose larping as the newfag while shitposting. Discussion that happens is usually nitpicking over social media posts. I’m sorry but this isn’t an attempt to control who says what, it’s putting an end to an absolute shit thread.

No. 57512

>>57510
what is milk, in your opinion ?

No. 57513

>>57436
There clearly is a group of anons who came from Chris's subreddit or the guru gossip jvlogger thread and there's a clear bias. >>57137
It's's why there have been posts like this >>>/w/250468 >>>/w/250489

This has been going on since thread 12 when anons got real upset over a brief discussion of Sharla's association with norm.
>>57507
The archaeological and bald and bankrupt shit was milky. Didn't Sharla also start an onlyfans?

No. 57515

>>57493
The only silver lining about trump chan is that she is contained to a single thread, I wouldn't want to encourage her to spread the retardation throughout the site. She's been banned numerous times though, the way she quietly ban evades but refuses to integrate after months makes me think it's an elaborate persona or a dedicated troll.

No. 57519


No. 57520

>>57519
That was fast thanks farmhands

No. 57521

>>57519
Reported that too, it quickly disappeared. Thank you farmhands!

No. 57522

>>57512
I know you’re going to nitpick my response so all I’m going to say is that general discussion/your opinion on recent social media updates is not milk. Continued discussion of these sorts of topics always leads to infighting and derailing. Just because you don’t like them doesn’t mean every single little thing they do is worth a lengthy discussion.
The thread, hell even most of /w, was never like this. Recent bans for non contribution are totally justified, if you want to sperg over Sharla’s nose or solas social media updates then go do that on Reddit?

No. 57525

File: 1684336622544.jpg (60.23 KB, 1053x818, Fvn3uQWXsBQYN2n.jpg)

Please make a porn dumping board already. That'll be a life changer.(scrote)

No. 57526

>>57513
Prove they come from reddit. Please. Stop tinfoiling and asserting as truth. Its shitposters in general and anons have acted like this in other threads

No. 57527

>>57525
literally why

No. 57530

Anons need to stop hi cowing and thinking cows are posting, it's derailing >>>/w/297126

No. 57531

If mods are going to redtext someone for derailing for genuinely replying to a post, all subsequent replies and the original post especially should be redtexted for derailing as well. If a reply to a derail is a derail, surely the original anon who started the derailing should get a warning, too.

No. 57532

>>57531
Post the example

No. 57533

>>57526
Lolcow was mentioned in Chris's subreddit so obviously some of them were lurking here. >>>/w/197615

Others migrated after that because they couldn't discuss the dating shit in the subreddit and it seems like some ended up staying. It's why whenever someone says that another jvloggers vids are better than Chris's, or there is any criticism at all of Chris, anons flip out over it. You can see the same shit in the subreddit.

No. 57534

>>57522
ayrt. I don't care and haven't posted about any of those things and it's pretty rich to preemptively assume I'm going to "nitpick" your response.
>general discussion/your opinion on recent social media updates
isn't that usually saged, meaning "not milk"?

The jvlogger thread isn't my cup of tea but I see the way people are trying to get it locked & worry that is going to affect other threads. Sharla's sexy pics = milk. Sola sperging about revenge = milk. Lily raising 75k with jvloggers but boohoo still not enough = milk. Sharla & Chris fucking up their dating timeline to hide the beginning? Also milk.

No. 57535

>>57531
(samefag)
I also agree with this, it's ridiculous tbh

No. 57536

>>57533
Mentioning it doesn't bring this type of shitposting, we would've seen it years ago too, not just this past year. It's a copout, the same way anons say "Well this is Pearl's MO" because they think they can get away with it by doing so. That's what makes it bait. Blaming another site or the cow themselves because of the tinfoil and planted look of it doesn't help the thread at all and it's tinfoil.

We know already that we have anons who use /w/, like the porn-addicted anons who kept editing Belle's photos and Venus's and desperately looking for their nudes to edit, that this isn't fan behavior. There are legit shitposters on /w/. Anons who constantly screencap other websites and Twitters as if they matter to the thread at all what other places are discussing need to go outside or maybe just go to those other sites in general. We don't need to discuss men's takes on women Chris are dating. Anons only bring up Reddit to talk about "What the fans are saying" as if everyone from the subreddit is even a fan to begin with. Milk needs to come from the cows, not from what other anons on another site are saying.

The fact that not wanting to derail about Chris's weight repeatedly makes you a fan is absolutely unhinged.

No. 57537

>>57530
How hard would it be to implement some kind of IP check rule for selfposting/self WKing/shitposting cows of which we have somewhat beyond a reasonable doubt or strong suspicion that they are who they seem? It would be partially majority rule, partially up to staff's personal judgement. I personally think it would curb derailing, infighting, and hi cowing if we could shut down the discussion instantly, and it would discourage LARPING as well because now that the staff is really cracking down (excellent job, btw, the best we've had in ages) it should put the fear into them that they're seen and aren't at liberty to embarrass themselves anonymously anymore.

No. 57538

>>57537
You know people can just change their location, right? How would that even work? You expect the mods to know it's the cow specifically.. how?

No. 57539

>>57538
Cows dumb enough to post in their own threads have usually just stumbled over here after googling themselves, become overwhelmed with indignation, and aren't often careful about those sorts of things before they start posting, and there are a lot of other tells for LARPers/shitposters such as typing styles and content of posts.

No. 57541

>>57539
That's not necessarily true. Especially ones who promote VPNs because of sponsors. Anon, get over it. A lot of the hi cowing is because anons know people are desperate to have it be a cow themself, but it's always the exact same posting style which makes it look obviously planted. As much as anons want it to be true, most cows probably don't lurk obsessively to care enough. Especially Youtubers who have comment sections and Reddits that do this already. You think Lolcow is going to be the crux for these Jvloggers? No.

No. 57542

>>57538
yeah agree with this. Impossible to verify for the most part.

No. 57543

>>57536
It doesn't bring shitposting but it does bring whiteknighting which is what I was referring to.
See this post >>57137 and all the posts linked in that post.

No. 57544

>>57543
If you can't read some of that as ragebait, you need glasses.

No. 57547

>>57544
If it was only shitposters they would be doing it for all jvloggers, not just those two.

No. 57549

>>57534
I’m not denying those topics you mention were milky. Let me use Mikans nose job as an example; the surgery itself, not particularly milky. Her usual bratty responses again not particularly milky but it is general snowflakery from her and a genuine update from a jvlogger. Notice how the conversation happened and then people moved on and it didn’t escalate into hell?
The thread could be locked temporarily or autosaged until the weird obsessed Chris and sharla spergs get bored and find somewhere else.
I hope that makes sense?

No. 57555

>>57547
Thats another bad excuse. When they are the only ones being talked about for almost 7 threads straight because anons were being autistic about cups and plane engines. That's why the focus was on them. The focus is still mainly on them. Anons are just now shitposting about Pearl and Daub now because it's disruptive like comparing Chris and Daub which isn't even a discussion, it's a term of preference on who you watch because everywhere they both cover are tourist spots.

>>57549
I was just thinking this last night. Milk: Bring it up, discuss, done. Anons alerted when Mikan got her splits removed and all and had a little talk and then a sperg comes in about Sharla because everything, like I said above, goes back to anons shitposting regarding Sharla and Chris and then deflect the posting as ThEy MuSt Be FrOM RedDit when they never are.

Unforunately, I don't think locking it temp will do anything or autosaging it. Anons will just spam until the thread reaches max. To be honest, there is not much milk at all from any of them. If anons have to keep bringing up old milk to justify the lack of current milk, then it is no longer new milk and doesn't warrant discussion like the anon who keeps attempting to bring up the archeological stuff for some reason, attempting to use lolcow as their own personal army and then throws tanrums and calls everyone whiteknights when they don't get what they want. Then comes the shitposting and spam and chatroom like discussion.

Surely people see the pattern. Mods probably see the pattern. If it is never new milk, and the newest milk you have is just ragging on the old milk, I say lock the thread and force everyone somewhere else to discuss YouTubers. Really check the quality over the past year and a half just like Belle and see if it's worth it.

No. 57561

>>57555
It's a group of double standards anons who say that they aren't defending Chris/Sharla and that "having a different opinion doesn't make you a whiteknight" yet called the anons who said to stop vendetta sperging about Chris's ex whiteknights and said "go defend her elsewhere". They've spread multiple lies like "Sola was friends with Lily" "John daub did his monkey vid right after Chris, he's copying him". They aren't just shitposters, they are also schizo simps.

No. 57562

>>57527
To post porn? wtf is this question

No. 57563

>>57530
ok but that was legitimately Pearl hopping on the thread for that one post, on that I think we can all agree.

No. 57567

File: 1684376557303.png (8.23 KB, 1308x185, cow.PNG)

I have a small suggestion, that hopefully wouldn't be hard to incorporate. On our search page, can it please highlight the number of which page you're on? Sometimes it's hard to tell which page you're on.

No. 57569

>>57561
Those aren't simps.

No. 57570


No. 57572

>>57570
it was definitely her, why are some anons so adamant about saying "no" kek

No. 57573

>>57567
I'm pretty sure that's handled by Google, not lc.

No. 57574

now there's all these different characters showing up in jvlog, like Edgar, and Mron, and who knows what's going to happen there next ffs

No. 57576

>>57569
Yes they are. >>>/w/295000
They moved on from sperging about the ex to shitposting about other stuff like pearl and Sharla's nose.

No. 57577

>>57576
Lily was on topic and then it became anons using her mundane posts as bait. Please, just stop pointing fingers. The shitposters have always been the shitposters. The people telling anons to stop posting Reddit caps are not simps.

No. 57578

>>57577
All I'm saying is that the shitposters and whiteknights are all the same group. One of them is easy to spot as they keep linking the thread when they post. >>>/w/294704 >>>/w/294847

Stop derailing with reddit caps when that's not what was in that post or this one >>57561

No. 57580

>>57572
Here’s why I don’t think it was her, there is a weirdo who has been shitposting in that thread for a long time. They will adopt whatever persona to cause infighting for whatever reason. Just off the top of my head, there was one who kept saying Tkyoham was great but it didn’t get much attention so that stopped. Then there was the trust me sis type posts, overly critical of Sharla/Chris’s appearance, in the poopy/sharlas nose/Edgar, posting as if they were a cow (norm, pearl, and whoever else)
I realise that is vague without caps but I don’t have time to go through and grab them.
There just seems to be a pattern; the thread goes quiet so in comes the unsaged namefag, lots of redtext/arguing, in comes the poopy posts. Someone brings up something but the thread is quiet, derailing by pretending to be the cow in question.
I used to think it was someone who knows them but I’m beginning to think it’s just a resident spammer who camps /w/

No. 57582

>>>/ot/1580763
AV spammer back at it

No. 57583

>>57578
Yeah they aren't. I've been called a WK specifically because I asked to not derail until we get adating announcement. You had anons shitposting about Santorini. For months.

No. 57584

Possible ban evade thread maker >>>/w/297193

No. 57585

>>57580
Except that those posts were clearly continuous shitposts meant to wind everyone up which fooled nobody, while the tone was very different in the supposed one-off post by Pearl.

No. 57586

Anon, please. Fucking stop. You're sounding like the anon who posted the Pearl thing at this point. The idea that 'The tone' is different is exactly the shit shitposters have been doing. You are either the anon in question who posted it and are acting all aloof or you are this gullible to believe Pearl is posting. She isn't.

No. 57588

>>57586
You're looking at it wrong. She's not "posting" she posted once, and then fucked off. Nobody is saying some anon was repeatedly LARPing as Alyssa. She probably heard there was shit being talked and showed up to see what it was about, said her thing, and bounced. There's no other posts that sound like that and there's no other posts suggesting it's her. I don't think it's a stretch at all to accept that she just jumped on and basically told nonnies to go fuck themselves.

No. 57589

Can a mod ban the troon posting in the tradthot thread on /snow/

No. 57590

pretty sure sola is one of the shitposters tbh

No. 57591

>>57589
yeah sorry nona that is not a moid, just a very uninformed nona. par the course considering the thread lol

No. 57592

>>57588
Stop hi cowing obvious bait. It's getting old. I hope a mod bans you for keeping this up because it's not true Pearl posted .

No. 57596

>>57592
you're a fascist. you can't prove it either was or was not her. I hope you get banned for being a fascist. nobody is hi cowing. it's very clear (if you'd followed the convo in the thread) that that post came out of nowhere and was totally different than anything else around it, and it was un-saged. use your tiny brain nonnie.(unbridled autism)

No. 57598

There's random shota sperging (from both sides) in the Husbando matchmaking thread, I just reported a bunch of those posts.
For context, the infighting started here >>>/m/297178 in response to an anon who did nothing but say "cool design but I'm not comfortable having an underage husbando" >>>/m/297175 which didn't mention shota in any way and it's just a personal preference.

No. 57603

>>57596
Lol the spergs are in full swing, thank you for the moderation for real

No. 57604

Can we PLEASE have a hellweek

No. 57605

>>57604
based suggestion

No. 57606

>>57604
AFAIK we will get hellweek when they have enough staff.

No. 57608

So the general consensus seems to be, cows NEVER come in to their threads to defend themselves unless they're namefagging and making it 100% obvious and self-admitting that it's them. It's like we never had the Kiki sperg at once point losing their shit in the Kota thread. Would they have been dismissed as a LARPer by this generation of farmers? It feels like some anons think that because they themselves can't tell whether it's the cow posting or not, then nobody else can either. Ironically this kind of thinking really only shields the cows who post in their own threads and the shitposting LARPers because no one would ever believe that it's actually possible, and no one would check.

No. 57609

Before anyone calls me a newfag I've been here like 6 or 7 years on and off, I just usually stick to snow and a couple ot threads. But why does the user being put out to pasture redtext not result in a ban? I've always wondered that

No. 57615

>>57608
Cows aren't posting in /w/.

No. 57616

>>57608
Well, there is a difference between 2 posts from someone and however long Kiki got away with it. Kikis time was way before vpns so it was easier to detect.
I refuse to believe any of them care about lolcow, I mean look at the state of the thread - it’s all baseless garbage with a dash of infighting and shitposting.
If anything they will enjoy the extra traffic their socials get.

No. 57619

>>57616
They have things like their actual YouTubes and Twitters, Instagrams, some have TikToks. They aren't obsessively checking lolcow even though anons get off to the thought of it.

No. 57621

>>57616
VPNs have been around for a very long time kek, just because you just learned about them doesn't mean anything

No. 57622

>>57615
Cows have absolutely posted in /w/

No. 57624

>>57622
Anons post is about Pearl in the jvlog thread specifically.

No. 57626

>>57624
ok then
well her name is Alyssa not Pearl, and she posted in the Jvlog thread to defend some bullshit about her face, that's literally all that happened and it happened once and it's insane the level of derailing and infighting anons are pouring into denialism

No. 57628

File: 1684563758545.png (86.19 KB, 864x1696, Screenshot_20230518-152153.png)

>>57626
whenever Oriental Pearl is brought up in jvloggers (about 1-2x a year), it is always followed by brief WKing about her language abilities and her appearance. This time it really blew up but you can search lc for previous mentions and see posts saying how her languages are so impressive and how there's nothing wrong with her teeth, etc. Also the thing about her filming kids has been an annual topic, anons reeing over how it should have been brought up a year ago forgot that it was in fact brought up a year ago. >>>/w/207877

I don't really know or care if she's posting, I just see some weird patterns when she is brought up. Um, one person defending Pearl also used the same language to defend Bald (if someone is 17 years and 364 days old, are they a child??): >>>/w/268634
Same language used about the kids Pearl was photographing: >>>/w/296423 (nevermind that those kids were easily under the age of 9)

No. 57629

>>57628
>>57626
This tinfoil has gone on long enough

No. 57632

>>57628
I dunno anon, that image looks exactly like every conversation about any cow in that thread. The ‘wk’ posts just sound like disagreement rather than wking.
Like for example, the conversation about sharlas nose, Chris’s weight, etc etc.

No. 57637

>>57632
Not like anons haven't larped to drum up milk before.

No. 57639

>>57637
Exactly

No. 57640

>>57632
The conversation about Sharla's nose was not a conversation, it was one anon obsessively shitposting about her perfect beautiful gorgeous ski jump nose (which is obviously the work of angels) etc

No. 57641

I demand a porn board(no)

No. 57642

>>57640
Maybe that was a bad example, but regardless of how weird they are you could say one of the comments is on par with >her language abilities are genuinely amazing tbh.
I think people nitpick Sharla over the stupidest things and absolutely cannot understand the obsession over her and Chris - does that make me a wk?

No. 57643

>>57642
it doesnt make you a wk but it's weird to not understand the obsession with them, they're two of the top jvloggers for the last ten years who cheated on their partners to start a relationship that they hid for years and took great pains to lie about and cover up.
if that's not the definition of milk then I don't know what is.

No. 57644

>>57640
Multiple anons were shitposting about noses.

>>57643
Nta, but the obsession has evolved in to only shitposts and nitpicks regarding them

No. 57645

>>57643
Def not wanting to go down that rabbit hole, Jesus Christ never again. But I do agree they are the top jvloggers of the last 10 years.

No. 57647

>>57645
top of the shit heap

No. 57648

I've brought up other jvloggers multiple times, only for WKs or shitposters posing as WKs to bring the conversation back to Sharla and Chris almost every time. Name-dropping others jvlogger can get you accusations of being that cow, too. If mods would regulate blatant WKing in jvloggers, which I've seen done in some other threads, it wouldn't matter if the anon was an WK, shitposter or cow. By blatant, I mean people who just post to exclaim their love of a cow, or who make up false claims to defend a cow or make their cow's rivals look bad. There's no gray area when it comes to those cases.

No. 57649

>>57648
Your definitions of what whiteknighting is is always just people not agreeing with takes thrown around, like the cheating that never happened. Saying you don't believe the utter lack of proof makes you a WK. If you're going to bring up fake milk like comparing Daub and Chris, videoing the same heavily trafficked tourist areas, then dont bother bringing up other cows. Even most of the stuff brought up about Chris and Sharla isn't milk.

No. 57650

>>57648
>>57649
Samefag, but Lily is batshit insane. That's not making a rival look bad by pointing out they're crazy.

No. 57651

>>57650
i've seen exactly zero evidence of this.
>>57648
derail about sharla's nose is perfect example of what you're saying. Focus wasn't on her, shitposters made it about her. I agree with your post btw.

No. 57653

>>57651
Nta, but I also agree that Lily was off and also wasn't cheated on. She was crazy to make a statement that was false, so she deleted it asap like a coward and had no follow-up proof or anything to back it up.

Anyway, let's stop bringing up old milk like the anon who keeps baiting by bringing up Bald every chance they get and when they get told to fuck off about their bait, suddenly you're a whiteknight and you're from Reddit.

Reddit and whiteknight accusations posts need to be reported at this point.

No. 57654

>>57653
She said she got confirmation of something she suspected for years. No, she couldn't prove it - it was more circumstantial but all the information adds up in her favor, not C&S. She deleted it because she didn't want all their fans on her back (said it explicitly) and also a friend on Twitter openly tweeted to her that the backlash might not be worth any further exposure. That's not false anything and she wasn't a coward for rethinking posting about it.

I find takes like yours almost without humanity. You've never known someone who was cheated on betrayed in some way? It is common knowledge that there sometimes isn't a smoking gun in these situations, but a pile of little clues that add up.

No. 57655

Some of the Jvlog anons have moved to the Taylor thread. Someone keeps posting really weak discussions about the most mundane and unmilky things possible. I know saged stuff doesn't have to be milk, but are threads no longer required to have any sort of milk to have a discussion and have results to nitpicking about what goes in a salad and complaining that someone asked their family to notice a haircut or the fact they got their teeth cleaned? Come on, at least post things to discuss. This is just low effort, random social media posts which is rule:
>7.3 Milkless social media statuses and images
Being saged shouldn't keep it from needing to be milky even a little bit, not just nitpicks anons want to make based on their own shitposts

>>>/w/297421
All she did was get her bangs cut and ran around seeing if her baby or Tom noticed, anon's claim of this being a desperate attempt to be noticed by Taylor makes no sense, it's her family, there's no milk here

>>>/w/297422
A whole post about her getting her teeth whitened, really? Again, no milk. Anons just want to post photos they think are stupid and it just shits up the thread.

>>>/w/297389
Anon posted this to complain that Taylor is following the Kardashians or something all because the kid is using a printed out toy credit card and she made a joke about how 'she's just like mommy'. Again, posted with a fake milk caption for whatever fuck reason. It's getting to a point where it feels like anons are just filling the thread. They did this in the Jvlog one too with posts just like these.

>>>/w/295677
Posting because anon didn't like her adding a 'y' to describe food and now it's been allowed for anons to just shitpost about anything she makes. We don't need to see anon be autistic about the way food is described. Post it when it's burnt or something to actually laugh at even.

>>>/w/297225
>>>/w/297270

No. 57656

>>57654
No follow, no nothing. No who this is and for all we know this 'person' is this website.

No. 57657

>>57648
jfc over-exaggerate much

No. 57658

>>57655
wow, you wrote a lot just to complain that you didn't like what anons are discussing. If you don't like it, don't read it? Tom's primate grunts and Taylor creaming herself over her own hair was funny to me. The rest is meh but lol you're so mad that your cow's thread is occasionally active.

No. 57659

>>57658
"creaming herself"
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA

that's like the funniest thing EVER

No. 57660

>>57650
What points to her being batshit insane? The accusation tweet points to her being bitter af but it doesn't make her crazy. If your bf dumps you almost immediately after spending two months traveling with someone that they're clearly attracted to then it's understandable that you would have suspicions. Half the comments on those JAJ vids were about if they were a couple or banging.
Anons did try to make her look bad by lying about her being friends with sola and saying that sola dropped her. Anons also lied about a gofundme scam and said that she attacked Sharla. No proof for either of those. Also no proof of people unfollowing her after the tweet. Anons also lied multiple times that they broke up before JAJ despite clear proof that it was afterwards.

No. 57661

>>57660
They didn't spend two months traveling together" Sharla was on the ride for a few days then rejoined them later just to ride along in the van. It's not like they were "traveling together" for two months ffs

No. 57662

>>57649
There have been anons saying that Sharla's old milk is fake. It's not just not agreeing with takes.

No. 57663

welp now Meta is Chris+Sharla hellscape nightmare too.

Nice job idiots.

No. 57664

>>57658
Lol salad is a discussion? Is w that slow for you guys?

No. 57665

>>57660
Cheating isn't going to be legit no matter how hard you scream

No. 57666

>>57661
She was there for almost the entire trip and the whole crew was clearly staying at the same hotels and hanging out so yeah it counts as traveling together.
>>57665
I just said it was reasonable to be suspicious. That's it.

No. 57667

>>57666
Might not want to use this thread to derail about year old non confirmed milk.

No. 57668

Cerbmin has a 5 meter stuck up their wooh hahs

No. 57669

Evweytikw I go on snow Effinas thread is full of race baiting, moids talking about childern and how their e daddy is so miserable and ruined because the life he chooses to live. There's no milk or anything. Maybe it should be locked or unbumpable?

No. 57672

>>57669
are you having a stroke

No. 57673

PLEASE STOP THE CHRIS AND SHARLA AUTISM HERE, TAKE IT BACK TO YOUR CESSPOOL IN /W/

No. 57674

>57649
>Your definitions of what whiteknighting is is always just people not agreeing with takes thrown around
Lying about something that never happened to make a cow look good or their rival bad, or just coming to lolcow to write or shitpost paragraphs about how much you love a cow has nothing to do with agreeing with takes. And why are you bringing up Chris cheating in this thread when there was no mention of it?

No. 57675

Mods should permaban anyone here who continues to vomit C&S old milk bullshit

No. 57676

>>57674
One anon did that, it was bait, let it go already. God damn your superiority complex needs armchair attention.

No. 57677

Can hidden board posts and images be hidden from the front page too? The "reaction pics" that are being posted on /shay/ uncensored are absolutely disgusting.

No. 57678

Like I said before I'm surprised it was the belle thread of all things that got locked on /w/ when the jvlog thread (and the taylor thread sometimes) is 1000x more retarded and every other cow thread there is dead as a doorknob. Admin said they locked the belle thread because of all the reports, you cannot tell me they aren't lit up with jvlog reports all day everyday kek

No. 57679

>>57678
The Belle thread was shit was shit with stalking her friends to post unmilky and sometimes edited photos, someone was editing her stuff in general (and Venus's), anons couldn't move on from old milk and kept bringing it up when anons would mention she's not milky anymore just because of porn photos.

Just nitpicking porn isn't fun. If anons want to act like scrotes over non-milky things, they can fuck off to Reddit. Anons even attempted to edit even normal photos.

Next that should go is Jvlog if you idiots can't stop derailing about old milk like the Bald retard who is desperate to get anons into their Chris Alpha Male tinfoil army.

No. 57680

>>57679
the worst in jvlog is when anons ship chris and the other jvlogger whose name I can't remember right now, the one that kind of looks like ostrich

No. 57681

>>57680
The shipping is obvious bait too. Anons really are treating this like a chatroom. I see this in Pixielocks thread too.

No. 57682

Kelly Eden is acting super self important by asking a commissioned artist "where do you keep your references" on extremely intricate art pieces that are being hand painted with cool distortion effects for Roq La Rue but she has no new thread. Anyone from w in here want to make one?

No. 57683

>>57065
Anorectal violence sperg in /ot/

No. 57684

Can we maybe split these up? One for complaints one for suggestions? These threads move so fast from all the complaints and infighting I think admin is missing the suggestions.

No. 57685

>>57641
There's one on CC, weirdo. Figure it out.

No. 57686

>>57682
why don't you make one ffs it's not rocket rhinoplasty

No. 57687

The thread is fine right now, but theres constantly anons trying to infight >>>/w/297536

No. 57688

>>57687
that's not infighting you twat ffs, how sensitive are you kek

No. 57689

anon stirring shit and trying to infight in jvlog
>>>/w/297545

No. 57690

>>57689
Anon what the actual fuck? How on earth is that post infighting, please tell me?

No. 57691

>>57690
it's more infighting than >>>/w/297536
because it's directly attacking another anon for expressing an opinion, grow up and stop trying to stir shit nonnie it's a bad look

No. 57692

>>57691
Are you okay? I didn’t attack anyone, I simply said it’s posts like yours that make me want the mods to lock the thread.. quit baiting and gaslighting people.
I made second post, but I didn’t make the first one fyi.

No. 57693

Cp spam in monkey thread in m

No. 57694

>>57690
>>57688
Found the shitposter

No. 57695

Anons still derailing about Pearl.

No. 57696

Can we just ban the samefagging/ip hopping anon >>>/w/297544

It's so obvious they keep ban evading

No. 57697

File: 1684698811073.gif (1.2 KB, 23x18, emot-allears.gif)

Thank you kindly to whomever lifted my mysterious, baseless permaban. Idk if someone specifically did this or if it happened as a result of some other sweeping changes on the site but I appreciate it. Even though I know better now than to use my native IP kek

No. 57698

Anal rectal violence moid is back in ot, now calling for political assassinations. That's a fun new angle.

No. 57699

>>57698
All because he wants to jack off to natural, intact anuses. kek

No. 57700

>>57694
FYI anon this was my only post >>57690, the other one wasn’t me. I am not the resident shitposter, I’m not IP hopping and I wasn’t part of the conversation. I just happened to read the thread and made my comment.
I’m not going to argue the ban I received (it’s over, not evading) but can mods just look back at conversations before throwing the ban hammer?
You can see my only comment was >>291608, and I moved on to post about Mikan and said no more. The reason I replied like I did is because (as you will see from my post history) I have mentioned locking the thread.

No. 57703

>>57700
jfc relax

No. 57704

Who the hell made that post that was like "go complain about it in /meta/"? I saw you.

No. 57705

>>57703
No, if idiots want to call people out they better get it right!

No. 57707

>>57705
it is an anonymous forum, ffs. relax.

No. 57708

>>57707
Oh, so it was you who complained? Look, if you’re gonna report me and reee about it on /w/ and here, I’m sorry but you have got to be confident who you are accusing. Stop trying to stir shit nonny, it’s not a good look kek.

No. 57709

>>57708
I didn't complain and you need to take your meds and stop trying to infighting with every other anon here you crackhead

No. 57713

An anon from shaynas past was dishing milk but was also a retard and posted their profile picture in a screenshot. Surprisingly, unlike every other case of accidental profile pics, a farmhand deleted the image. Several of us are confused why this content was deleted when photos of shaynas apartment are still visible. Why are we protecting randoms that didn't even know how to sage until told? In many cases farmers have been able to find the profiles of people who accidentally reveal znd the results are always hilarious, especially when its someone from irl.

No. 57714

>>57713
the passwords arent working.
they were providing milk.
in other threads people who dont know how to sage etc are not banned if they are providing milk. same shit here.
shayna threads already get derailed too fucking much as it is and nonas stalking a random lolcow user would not be funny or enterteining just derailing bs! stop saying it would be funny or milky to leave the pic up, it woudln't, it would only derail the retarded thread more as it is

No. 57715

>>57714
No one is saying she should be banned. The sage was brought up because they're using the site without reading the rules, as proof they're a newfag and don't deserve undue protection just for proving a couple of old photos.

No. 57719

Hi cow, tinfoil, reeeing about bans again. A mod should check, one of these is most likely ban evading a lengthy ban.

>>>/w/297740 (same bs hi cowing as the fake pearl poster)
>>>/w/297738
>>>/w/297736

No. 57720

>>57719
this anon is off her fucking rocker. calling a literal graph from social blade "tinfoil" is the height of reeeeee behavior.

No. 57721

>>57567
Thank you guys a lot for updating the search page! It looks nice, I appreciate the addition of searching on individual boards. Idk if it was because of my post, but if so it was a quick update.

No. 57723

>>57721
Samefag, but actually something about the whole site looks different, like the alignment of the posts. Am I tripping or do you guys see it too? I swear posts look different.

No. 57724

I'm new to meta so sorry if this has been said/mentioned before.

I think a general handmaiden/faghag thread would be good. I see a lot of nonas posting in the troon threads with their stuff but it doesn't really fit. I feel like there's a lot of potential milk that could come from it.

Also where is the search bar people have spoken about? I feel like I still don't navigate this site well after ~5 years of using it.

No. 57725

cp on /m/

No. 57726

Scrote spamming cp in m. Pedos deserve the rope.

No. 57732

>>57724
You can find the search link at the bottom of the index on any board. It's next to "Catalog"

No. 57733

Is that vtuber anon a vtuber herself? wtf is her deal (or your, if you're the girl reading this. lol)

No. 57734

>>57733
I know right, kek. She gets way too angry over people not liking Vtubers. It didn't occur to me that she could be a Vtuber herself.

No. 57735

>>57732
Thank you ♥

No. 57737

Sorry to nitpick but how come the anons in the gyaru thread get to indulge in their y'all-ing and w-ing without getting banned for refusing to integrate ? I know there are lots of anons who have a distinct way of writing, but some girls in that thread truly stick out like a sore thumb.

>>57724
Maybe we could expand the spicy straight thread to include them ? Since they have the same obsession with a group of people that they aren't actually a part of…

No. 57738

>>57737
Not all bans are redtext.

No. 57740

Hi farmers! We are interviewing new staff and still taking farmhand applications. To date, we have received about 30 responses, and have narrowed those down to 11 legitimate responses. We have also created an official newfag label for posts! When you click on it, it will take you to lolcow.farm/info. I will attach it at the bottom of this post.

Rancefag’s nudes have been floating around, please report them so we can continue to remove them. Although she posted them of her own free will, she seems unwell so we would like to keep them off the site as we feel like she will surely regret posting them here. Update: she said posted them during a manic episode.

>>57345
I understand your grievances. This whole shota/loli rule creation and polling process has been a learning process for us and, despite the clamor and stress it’s brought farmers and staff, I feel like we have gained a lot of insight into what farmers want from us. As far as the fujo thread goes, I will personally keep a closer eye on it.

>>57346
>>57348
>>57416
Sorry for the confusion, both the kiwi bunker and kiwi thread in /snow/ have been locked. The kiwi thread in snow was locked because it attracted Blaine and Elaine, and was continuously a place for Elaine’s nudes to be posted. >>57422 explains it well.

>>57369
/g/ is a haven for all sorts of female fantasies and sex discussion. I haven’t personally seen much dd/lg discussion on the farm, the culture seems pretty hostile towards it. “Do not post pornography” still applies.

>>57400
>>57401
>>57405
Proposed redtexts: cringe, sus, femcel, it’s giving, y'all, ma'am, yikes, anti(s), proship(per)(s). As a southern anon, y'all is most contentious to me. What do farmers think about the new redtext?

>
>57404

Manhate seems more inline with 2X’s culture, but farmers are welcome to vent about their grievances with males in the vent threads. /int/ was closed years ago due to lack of activity. If we see an increase in interest in international cows on /snow/ then /int/ returning could be a possibility.

>>57474
We try to delete as few things as possible for the sake of transparency. Our current protocol is to only delete spam, CP, double posts within threads, and posts by males that are clearly seeking attention so they don't get the satisfaction (unless the posts and replies are funny enough to be worth keeping). One exception to this rule was the Sharla nosefag in /w/ the other day. Which spam threads are you referring to?

>>57487
>>57489
>>57494
>>57496
>>57556
>>57518
>>57548
>>57550
>>57552
>>57553
>>57556
>>57560
>>57579
We will consider putting “change spoiler image” up for a vote, it may have to wait until Nucow.

>>57524
Money from Ko-fi goes to admin to subsidize the cost of running the server. Obviously, this means we have updated the deposit information. Currently our server bill is about $250 USD due monthly. We have received a $6 donation, $5 after Ko-fi took their cut, from Ko-fi in the time we have been admin and it was spent on the server bill (meaning whoever paid it that month paid $245 USD).

>>57571
>>57587
>>57594
Threads may be considered dead when there haven’t been any posts in some weeks/months, or there hasn’t been any milk in weeks/months. Bumping a dead thread with new milk is not considered necro - so if you have new milk to contribute, feel free to bump the thread rather than make a whole new thread.

>>57601
The tradthot thread kept us very busy the other day kek

>>57448
I get the sentiment here, but milk is subjective. When I’m not familiar with a certain cow, and I see that nothing has been posted for weeks until some unsaged update, I have to make the decision to either ban because “no milk” or just let the slow thread continue to be a slow thread until it dies. Locking threads because there’s no milk seems a little too helicopter-mod to me, if farmers want to continue to discuss a cow, why cut them off? The Belle thread is an exception here because of how many reports it generated. When every post is ban-worthy, we may as well lock the thread.

>>57462
/w/ will remain separate from /snow/. We are open to input from farmers.

>>57492
The Nigel posters in Shayna’s thread have been banned due to blogging.

>>57505
Double posting has been an issue in the past, but yes, it seems to have gotten worse. Lolcow is running on old software (like 7 years old with no updates or patches old) so when we fix something, something else may break. We hope Nucow will be our solution as it’s being custom built by one of the admins.

>>57513
>>57436
>>57412
>>57534
>>57522
>>57555
I’m personally keeping an eye on the J-vloggerz thread for WKs and derailers, but I don’t know all of the lore and the thread is a pain in the ass

>>57531
>>57535
Will you post the example? Usually the initial derailer continues to reply, so we just redtext their most recent post rather than redtexting multiple posts.

>>57537
The problem with checking an IP and then claiming a cow is selfposting is that anyone with a VPN can change their location to Japan and then post “as a Jvlogger.”

>>57567
>>57721
The search page has been updated to highlight the page you are on when browsing results, auto-sorts results newest to oldest, the theme mimics the default lolcow theme more, and you can now filter search results by board. You’re welcome, anon ♥

>>57604
Hellweek will come when we have onboarded the new staff. We’re currently conducting interviews. We strongly encourage more farmers to fill out the farmhand application, even if they only have a few minutes a day to mod or check for spam/CP.

>>57609
USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE is our default redtext for a ban of any length. Redtext is optional, so a post without redtext may have still received a ban. In other words, every post with redtext has received a ban (temporary or permanent).

>>57655
Taylor’s thread is notoriously stale. If farmers really want to discuss her getting her teeth whitened, making salad, or cutting her bangs, fine. There is literally nothing else going on in that thread.

>>57677
Posts to /shay/ will no longer appear on the front page, neither in the images nor posts sections.

>>57737
I'll go have a look, but like another farmer said, not all bans are redtexted.

No. 57744

>>57740
Is taylors thread subject to close when full then? I feel like mikan, taylor, all fashion vloggers from /w/ should be condensed. Her thread, like you said, is so stale and boring.

No. 57745

>>57740
Sorry but I was reading the info over and just realized this is here
>If you've made a typo or want to correct any part of your comment, copy the text, delete it, and re-post it. Do not double-post to correct yourself.
Kek, does anyone even follow this rule.
Anyway, I will riot if y'all gets redtexted. My country heart would not be able to take it.

No. 57746

>>57744
why should it be subject to close? Please. When you say shit like this, you sound suspicious - how do you not understand that? Mikan wasn't denied a new thread, it's just that no one has made one. No one makes you read a thread you personally don't like! There are lots of threads on lc that I don't read.

No. 57748

redtexting the word "y'all" is offensive to a lot of people and I hope it doesn't happen, red text a word like "literally" instead please y'all.

No. 57752

>>57748
don't redtext either of these, "literally" gets used normally too

No. 57753

>>57752
I was just trying to think of an overused and annoying word and it was literally all I could think of

No. 57755

Please remove this post with Shayna’s address >>>/snow/1833200

No. 57759

>>57746
Can you not hi cow? Stop.

No. 57760

File: 1684894793858.jpg (104.22 KB, 1080x891, Screenshot_20230523_192022_Chr…)

Infighting between what looks like a samefag and probably one of the same anons who keep derailing about their bans. This thread won't ever stay on topic.

No. 57761

>>57760
The police anon who just posted this consistently infights and causes problems in /w/

No. 57762

>>57761
Tbh, the screencap post was already redtext when that anon mentioned caps. There was no point in replying to begin with.

No. 57764

>>57762
the same police anon reported a legitimate milky graphic showing data proving abroad in japan's failing channel as "tinfoil"

she's drunk on on a power trip for some reason, she needs to take her meds

No. 57772

File: 1684905391875.png (41.8 KB, 1110x202, Screen Shot 2023-05-23 at 11.0…)

>complain about retard shit
>no one agrees
>make retarded jumps through hoops to arguee shayna was doxxed, even type "assshually doxxing is illegal" like an absolute sped, act like yearbook photos of shayna should be deleted because "underageee" when these type of photos are completely allowed of any other cow
>reply to yourself in the same typing style days later because you are still fuming
>post your retard doxx bait
i know shayfags are kinda dumb but you guys don't actually believe its a kiwifag right… like it is very obviously the autisitic mini mod talking to herself… its very obvious reading her. posting here to avoid derailing shaynas

No. 57774

>>57764
If mods do or don't do something that's their call.

No. 57777

>>57759
there was no hi cow in anon's post

No. 57786

there is a russian scrote from 4chan that recently started to post his shitty drawings in the doodleboard thread, I know it's him because he posts the same drawings on 4chan while namefagging
>>>/ot/1585088

No. 57790

Vendetta posting and unsaged non milk being posted in radfem cows thread.

No. 57791

Infighting in radfem cows thread.

No. 57792

>>57740
Thanks for the update. In relation to Taylor’s thread being stale and farmers chatting about whatever.. could the same be applied to the jvlogger thread? If it’s universal that anything (within reason) goes you might get less whinging from me about the state of the thread kek.
I’d be interested to see how things go, but as it is arguably already the AIJ subreddit extension I can imagine it’ll be about only that and nothing else.
Just thinking out loud here too before everyone shouts at me lol.

No. 57793

>>57777
You can tell exactly what they meant. What's suspicious otherwise?

No. 57794

>>57792
Nothing about the thread relates back to the subreddit. This isn't reddit.

No. 57795

There's a troll derailing the TiF thread. The one sperging about sinfest or whatever. Tried to report him but the site lagged a lot. Also I accidentally reported a person above him because I just saw mention of that annoying sinfest robot and my eyes glazed over and I just reported assuming that was the troll's post and I apologize for that mistake of mine.

No. 57796

>>57794
I was generalising, I meant the thread is full of people from the subreddit.

No. 57797

>>57793
you need to stop making assumptions and reeing about them. Cows have friends and simps, that's all I meant. Not that any cow was or is posting.

No. 57798

Even though I wouldn't be surprised if it is Sharla (sounds like her with "hun") there's annoying Hi cowing in /w/

No. 57800

>>57798
yeah I'm with this anon. I think this is actually Sharla, sticking up for her man
>>>/w/29708

No. 57801

>>57800
>>57798
The planted larping posts are obviously not the cows or affiliates and anons know this which is why they keep derailing using that. Its not Sharla. Its not Pearl. It's not Chris in disguise.

No. 57802

>>57801
Her name is Alyssa not Pearl, her channel is called Oriental Pearl. Calling her "Pearl" is like calling John Daub "Only" or Norm "Lens"

No. 57803

>>57802
I don't think anyone cares since everyone's been calling her Pearl.

No. 57804

>>57801
I wonder if you'll ever realize what makes your posts so clockable.

How do you know it's never any of them? But you believed it when someone posted as Lily, right?

No. 57805

>>57804
Regarding the cows posting according to admin:
>The problem with checking an IP and then claiming a cow is selfposting is that anyone with a VPN can change their location to Japan and then post “as a Jvlogger.”

Hardly anyanon believed it was Lily. I also don't believe the old /snow/ threads had the cows either.

No. 57806

>>57805
yeah sure, I believe the admin 100% with regard to the IP. But that doesn't mean a cow or cow's friends never post here. Kevin posted in Lori's thread iirc and I think we agreed it was him

No. 57807

>>57806
It does the thread nothing to assume every post is theirs too or someone is posting on their behalf. Tbh the Kevin thing was all too convenient.

No. 57808

>>57807
they obviously post here from time to time and anyone who thinks it like never happens is a dunce to the max

No. 57809

>>57805
We had confirmation from the cows themselves through their youtube and twitter accounts that they were posting on lolcow and PULL back during the Mira debacle. It's not a stretch to assume that they could still be dropping in. While there's no solid proof that they are posting, it's still tin-foiling to insist that they absolutely couldn't be. We have more than one example of Chris editing his work right after something was pointed out here. We had a Lily sperg who made the same comments that Sola later made on insta. We have Chris fans linking to our thread from the Abroad subreddit.

No. 57811

Sperg samefagging themselves and infighting in unpopular opinions thread.

No. 57812

>>57811
I'm in there now which one is samefagging? Is it the Midsommar defender?

No. 57813

>>57811
Samefag, it’s the tranny who has been shitting up the site for hours sperging/samefagging itself in unpopular opinions thread because anons liked midsommar kek.

No. 57814

>>57813
i thought it was the other way around, like the anon who kept defending the cult

No. 57815

>>57814
Not sure if you mean me, but I haven't been in Unpopular Opinions in a good while, so it wasn't me. The tranny shitting shit up is a different person kek

No. 57817

File: 1684972615676.png (178.24 KB, 1411x2048, glownigger.png)

whoever reported this is a retard and should be banned for retardation
>>>/ot/1586410(racebaiting)

No. 57818

I got red texted and was told to come here pls make the idiot talking about assisted suicide in the pixielocks thread stfu lol it has literally nothing to do with her

No. 57819

>>57817
Are the farmhands straight from twitter? How is this race-baiting

No. 57820

>>57819
>Are the farmhands straight from twitter?
NTA but probably, you can't even shit on trannies anymore.

No. 57823

>>57820
Shitting on trannies, is that like a scat play kink?

No. 57824

why was "trannies get the rope" redtexted in /ot/? how is that against the rules? is "kill all men" gonna get banned too?

No. 57825

>>57824
"trannies get the rope" can be read two ways, such as:
1. A command for trannies to acquire a rope
2. A rallying cry to hang trannies in an execution

So the post was red texted for a lack of clarity

No. 57826

File: 1684981056581.jpeg (212.18 KB, 940x2088, IMG_4245.jpeg)

How is this racebaiting??

No. 57827

>>57826
Nonny I was jus thinking to ask this kek. Wonder if it’s a new mod or miscommunication ? I don’t think the image nonna used falls under racebait. It’s just a meme image with no racist intention other than the aave.

No. 57828

>>57827
Racist intention vs using AAVE in an image I mean in my post.

No. 57832

>>57809
No1currs about old milk. Move on.

No. 57834

>>57827
Farmhand is sensitive to anything with nigga/nigger in the name, at least three bans handed out that I see

No. 57835

>>57817
>>57820
>>57819
I'm pretty certain glownigger has been banned for years and most anons already collectively decided to use glowie instead.

No. 57836

>>57835
If that is true then it hasn't been enforced those years. Looks like the only redtext on posts with it, of much most do not, say sage or one or two male posters

No. 57837

>>57740
I don't think "y'all" is necessary depending on the context, but please add "sewerside" and "peterfile" for the love of god. It's like a giant flag for tiktokers.

No. 57838

can we have shota in the BL thread on /m/ at least…please mods…

No. 57839

>>57836
Glow nigger probably gets overlooked because the intent of the anon using it in a post isn't to be racist. It's an insult used for federal agents and it's a meme phrase. However I'd argue that it's origins are racist.

No. 57848

>>57834
I understand nigger being banned but not the meme the nonna used. It was just a pic using AAVE and not race baiting. It’s a weird ban

No. 57860

>>57848
Anon was clearly using it as bait

No. 57865

>>57860
Are we looking at the same post? None of it has anything to do with race bait

No. 57866

Please stop using the N word

No. 57867

>>57865
I said the post itself was bait, not that it was racebait specifically. The picrel has nothing to do with anon's take.

No. 57873

>>57817
It's peak moid behavior to use that term anyway, because the majority of conspiracy theorists are retarded, gullible moids and kiwifags who don't know their face from their asshole, and tradtards eat that shit up too like with the satanist child killing pedo cult bullshit which is just propaganda from right wing abrahamic dickeaters. If you think the feds really give a shit about our petty little drama boards and could glean any useful info from them, you need to touch grass. We don't need to parrot moid rhetoric here, including racebait or whatever you want to call it.

No. 57876

>>57873
Seconded.

No. 57879

Misogynistic insults and threats plus infighting in the vent thread >>>/ot/1587060
The amount of Kiwi scrotes that have invaded that thread should be dealt with somehow. I've seen several anons get away with dogpiling and being very misogynistic in this particular thread. Worst case scenario it may have to be temp locked

No. 57884

Cp in m

No. 57886

>>57866
"Words are scary!!"

No. 57888

File: 1685042831869.jpg (30.02 KB, 456x399, 3ea58e7777633e234caf8b4a6b48fe…)

CP ON FRONT PAGE

No. 57889

CP on /pt/

No. 57891

>>57886
racism is scary

No. 57892

>>57891
It is, but saying nigger isn't automatic racism if it's in context to conversation and not used to insult a black person.

No. 57894

>>57892
What >>57873 said

No. 57895

>>57894
If you're that sensitive to words you shouldn't even be here tbh cause you're gonna see a lot worse than the word nigger

No. 57896

>>57895
I’m not the person you were talking to I just agreed with their view. I’m not afraid of words anon, it’s just the principle.

No. 57902

>>57896
The principle of what? Needing to use words to describe stuff sometimes? This shit is so newfaggy.

No. 57903

>>57892
The N word doesn't have a "context" to be said unless you are black

No. 57904

If outright racism continues to be apologized for here then there's other places to gossip about bullshit

No. 57906

>>57903
It does, you just proved that in your sentence. But you chose to say "the n word" instead because it's a big scary no no word kek

No. 57907

>>57904
If you think just the word nigger is racism then you can go gossip on twitter and leave(do not use racial slurs here, this isn’t /pol/)

No. 57915

>>57907
I'm gone. Bye.

No. 57916

Too bad Lolcow embraces racist ideologies. Just another extremist racist forum. Dime a dozen.

No. 57917

Maybe if you aren't American you might think that word is fine to throw around. But for American persons of color that word is unacceptable no matter how "edgy" you think you are.

No. 57918

>>57892
>It is, but saying n** isn't automatic racism

Saying it IS ABSOLUTELY automatic racism if you aren't black and saying it in context. Since this is an anonymous forum, any use of that word is indeed racist and intended to convey racist ideology while gaslighting anyone who does not want to hear that shit by saying "wHy ArE yOu AfRaId Of WoRdS" etc. Go fuck yourself.

No. 57919

File: 1685048987666.jpg (30.33 KB, 400x299, 14.jpg)

>>57917
>persons of color

No. 57920

the gaslighting in this shit hole is off the chain

No. 57922

>>57918
Nta but if someone says words that end in -fag is that bad too?

No. 57923

>>57922
I don't care, I'm black not a fag

No. 57924

sainte the ban evading pedotroon cow from the lolita thread is defending himself in third person, he refuses to refer to himself as male and instead is calling himself a they so I know it's him kek
>>>/w/298027

No. 57927

>>57923
Sounds like a personal problem

No. 57928

>>57923
Nigger(do not use racial slurs here, this isn’t /pol/)

No. 57931

File: 1685058075597.png (15.95 KB, 700x630, BD837AC9-889C-434A-B6D2-ECBC51…)

I think the gaijin gyaru thread should be locked since it’s just zoomer twittertards flinging shit at each other.

No. 57932

This poster got a ban for allegedly posting an emoji, but what I see is a parenthetical phrase followed by a colon: >>>/w/298009

Unless the emoji got removed, but I highly doubt that. Are you farmhands using some automatic filter to ban this or only reports? Because of all the useful filters LC could have, this one seems pretty dumb. I can't imagine anyone in the jvlogger thread is a Bronwyn-lover so it would surprise me if anyone cared to report that post.

All in all, nona (not me obv) copped an unfair ban for an emoji she didn't post

No. 57937

>>57932
Anon that's a fucking emoji that the anon snuck in

>for anyone who doesnt wanna waste 7 minutes (yes only 7… does she not know how vlogs work nowadays?): it's 3 minutes


That is not the start of a list to need to add : We have so many shitposters in the thread and they do these small things on purpose. Maybe anon should learn how to type without adding in a hidden emoji with the excuse of it being an accident due to typing form. Anon can reread and learn how to properly use a : then. The way anons demand answers for other anon's bans makes it seem like it's the same anons. Over the years I've rarely seen anons complain to this extent over banned posts that weren't even theirs.

No. 57938

>>57931
honestly barely use that thread and even I agree. someone is pretending to be posting as the cow in that thread too, seems like a /w/ staple for anons trying to make threads interesting that have nothing going on.

No. 57939

>>57937
"Hidden emoji" lmao, the paranoia really got to your head. Do you also wear a tinfoil hat

No. 57940

>>57939
Why do you even care if it's not your ban? Anon fucked up because their finger slipped, maybe the should learn2reread. A mod will look at that and see the same thing.

No. 57942

>>57932
I’m sure they were banned for a few hours, tops. I agree it seems like it wasn’t an intentional emoji but its such a minor ban anyway, probably doesn’t matter.

No. 57943

there's nothing wrong with posting this and asking about automatic bans triggered by a filter. I don't care how long anon's ban was. I want to know if a mod manually put it in or not.

>>57937 Get help. Also emojis written backwards like this aren't the norm in English.
>That is not the start of a list to need to add :
Holy fuck, not you instructing us how to write in the English language! lmfao anon, stay in your lane.

No. 57944

>>57918
To twitter with you

No. 57957

>>57943
Anon, that was reported, it's not some filter. This isn't Twitter.

No. 57959

>>57942
Nta but even if it was a short ban it should be pointed out anyway so mods don't just start banning people for stuff like that. I do think it was just a mistake on the mod's part though, but they've been "slipping up" a lot so they should be more careful and properly assess the situation before handing out bans.

No. 57963

>>57959
Mods aren't going to waste their time with hundreds of reports to read that an anon made a spelling mistake because you demand context on their part. It looks like an emoji, it can be read as an emoji. This is anon's fault for not checking their own post, not the mod's. Also people do post backwards emojis like this. This must've been you or something because being this mad over it when it's not even your ban is crazy.

No. 57965

>>57937
That is NOT an intentional emoji. The racist slurs and retarded banning are ruining lolcow

No. 57966

>>57965
Anons can appeal then

No. 57967

>>57957
any non smooth brained person can clearly see that's not intended to be an emoji, it is a parentheses followed by a colon. The parentheses is containing a description of the 7 minutes and the colon is indicating the time of 3 minutes.

If the parentheses and the phrase they contain were not there, it would read:

for anyone who doesn't wanna waste 7 minutes: it's 3 minutes

anyone who thinks that was an emoji probably had a mom who breast fed them after drinking bleach

No. 57968

Everyone in this thread is a fucking retard

No. 57970

>>57928
Mods don't just red-text, delete this at once

No. 57971

File: 1685067598322.jpg (79.75 KB, 720x740, 1685047677232.jpg)

>>57963
How am I mad, wtf? I just put in my opinion on the discussion. You actually seem like the upset one, and I could even say the same thing about you. Why be so upset if you're not the janny who handed out the ban?
>that an anon made a spelling mistake
It doesn't look like a spelling mistake, she was explaining the video. Not to mention someone also got a similar ban in /ot/. It would've only taken that janny an extra 5 seconds to read the sentence with the colon. It's not a big deal or a huge mistake but they should be more careful and read the context. That's all I'm saying.

No. 57975

>>57971
Samefag, but actually that post may not have been in /ot/, I just got the pic from /ot/

No. 57977

File: 1685068041776.png (7.75 KB, 482x298, Screen Shot 2023-05-25 at 7.25…)

Not to mention the fact that when I first saw that red text I was like WTF is that supposed to be anyway, because the emoji is BACKWARDS you fucking absolute imbecile mod whoever banned that. Are you honestly a total mental dumpster fire? Nobody writes emojis in that direction ffs. Even the red text looks as stupid as your idiot brain who banned it.

If it was a frowning emoji it would look like :(
and the red text would look like (:() not ():) you complete and total void of brain cells.

No. 57978

>>57957
Then it was reported by some fucking mushbrain with a kindergarten level understanding of the English syntax

No. 57979

>>57978
That's how reports work in general though. There's no auto system.

No. 57980

Massive spergout from one of the anons ITT most likely over this ban >>>/w/298074

Imagine not knowing how to appeal. Jvlog might as well be locked.

No. 57985

we definitely have been seeing some retarded nonsense bans lately, but I take that to mean we got new farmhands so I for one am celebrating! I know with time our new baby farmhands will mature into wonderful moderators.

No. 57986

>>57977
to be fair, in Russia and parts of Eastern Europe iirc the emojis are written in the opposite direction. It's still one of the most retarded bans I've seen on here in forever. Now we have a mod incapable of reading or skimming posts to verify a report? Fantastic.
>>57980
I'm sure you'd love if jvlog were locked, parasocial weirdo.

No. 57987

>>57968
Seriously.. what's going on?

No. 57989

Gyaru thread is filled with twitter tier infighting and "yo mumma" jokes. Kill them before they lay eggs.

No. 57994

>>57977
>>57932
Sorry about your ban lol

No. 58003

>>57994
I know for a fact those are two different anons

No. 58004

>>58003
I really don't care, good for you?

No. 58009

>>57986
If the belle thread was locked due to the "amount of reports and complaints" then the jvlog thread should be locked for the same reasons too. That thread is the worst on the /w/ and since everyone is being milk police about that board like they forgot its a containment board and the mods are too overwhelmed to moderate it, the thread should be locked just like the belle thread was.

No. 58010

>>58009
Belle thread was locked bc of moid infestation primarily. There's no porn being posted in the jvlogger thread so there's no good reason for it to be locked.

No. 58011

>>58010
That makes no sense. Belle made porn so naturally her shitty porn was being posted just like in moo,shaynas, cam girls thread etc. The admin said it was locked due to the amount of reports that thread got

No. 58012

>>57989
Seconding. Honestly the worst thread on /w/ right now. They're already making themselves welcome in other threads and shitting those up too with their mentally deficient takes that no one asked for.

No. 58013

>>57879
The increase of male presence on these boards is staggering. We should never have hosted their ilk to begin with. The weak "b-but it's just a word guys!" reeks of peak scrote logic. Not only that, but their poor attempts at integration and gaslighting/bullying the mods to do their bidding and change the culture here to suit their degenerate tastes have been increasing at an alarming rate. It's so easy to clock. The few "women" who claim to be okay with it are likely pickmes from the same cesspool.

No. 58014

>>58010
Those posts aren't from men in Belle's thread.

No. 58015

Honestly it's been refreshing to see an increase in active moderation around here, much more preferable to the circus that was being run before. Hope it makes people think twice before shitting up a thread. None of the bans so far have been really damning to anyone that matters so it's really more of a cut to some anons' egos.

No. 58016

>>58013
>The weak "b-but it's just a word guys!" reeks of peak scrote logic.

HEAR HEAR

No. 58017

>>58015
The ban for saying "trannies get the rope" is weird tho.

No. 58018

cp link in /pt/

No. 58019

>>58013
yeah no those are two different situations starring two different groups of people. /m/ doesn't have a scrote problem, you should try lurking sometime. fujos have potent natural danger colors to ward men off, their degeneracy is their own.

No. 58020

>>58017
That ban was for lack of clarity, see:
>>57825

No. 58021

>>58020
the red text literally said the ban was for a-logging
and if we can't tell trannies to die on lc then what?

No. 58022

>>58020
Thats not what the redtext said. Would saying "41%" be clearer kek

No. 58024

>>58021
trannies have every right to live and to be here on lolcow this is an inclusive space(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 58026


No. 58029

Did /w/ invade Shayna thread or why is there are a fuckton of bad edits and zoomed in pics

No. 58031

>>58025
the rules say no-one with a phallus, some trannies don't have phallus, and some trannies are FTM and don't have phallus as well. so according to the rules, if the only criteria is having phallus then anyone without phallus is allowed to post here, trannies included. dumbass.

No. 58033

>>58031
trannies get the rope

No. 58034

>>58031
Any XY not allowed. Fakebois are known to use this site. I don’t think any male, including TIMs should be encouraged to use LC, not like that would stop them but I like LC being a woman’s space. They have the rest of the internet.

No. 58035

>>58034
that's the most retarded thing I've ever heard. There's tons of women only spaces online. The Girlboss Community, Sheroes, Quit.. so many

No. 58036

>>58035
why do they need to be allowed here?

No. 58037

>>58031
>some trannies don't have phallus and some trannies are FTM
>troon has the right to post on lolcow if he has a surgically made open wound between his legs
no one is going to ban this obviously troon? i mean he is literally telling himself in this one

No. 58038

>>58035
men have been banned here for years, and tims, axewound or no, are no different from any other men. in fact, they're even more fucked up than the average man.

no one on earth gives a fuck about ftms. they're a self-hating joke class and them using female only imageboards in secret reaffirms that kek.

No. 58039

Everyone hates trannies besides themselves, they need to be bullied back into whatever nsfw discord channels and agp subreddits they crawled out of at all costs

No. 58040

>>58031
MtF troons were born with a phallus, you obtuse faggot.
An intersex XY person who didn't develop any male anatomy due to a rare genetic mutation (as was the case of an anon who posted about it in the MtF thread) is allowed here because that person has always looked and been treated as female since she was in the womb. TIMs are just regular males, unlike intersex people they are not special cases, whether they've chopped off their dick or not.
>>58035
There are only a couple of female-only imageboards. We like it here because we like imageboards and some of us won't even touch social media with a ten foot pole. There are so many troon-only and -inclusive websites on the internet where they will often invade any conversation held by women and make it about themselves or their fetishes, and we are not allowed to call them out on it because troonphobia is the worst possible crime you could commit in this day and age.
Also I don't see what's so wrong about having more female-only spaces online, women are not a monolith and we don't all want to use the same communities to talk about the same shit, because we all have different interests, preferences and opinions, that's why we use this imageboard instead of whatever those online communities you mentioned are.

No. 58041

>>58035
integrate or gtfo retard trannylover

No. 58042

>>58040
>women are not a monolith and we don't all want to use the same communities to talk about the same shit, because we all have different interests, preferences and opinions, that's why we use this imageboard instead of whatever those online communities you mentioned are.

This, thank you. I like LC because all types of women can use it, wether they just use it for cows or /m/ or /ot/ or radfem stuff. A lot of women only spaces online are radfem only, and that's cool, but what makes LC unique is all the variety it has for women

No. 58043

>>58031
Males are not encouraged to use the site, period. TIM/MTFs are male. TIF/FTMs are female, and thus permitted to post.

No. 58044

>>58029
Anons have always done that there

No. 58045

>>58043
Can you at least do something about the personalityfagging tif, she never shuts up. Do this for the other personalityfags too please.

No. 58047

Jvlog had anons infighting over the use of the word "author" and spamming photos from Amazon

No. 58049

>>57065
The Twitter hate thread has just devolved into infighting and one older anon clearly having an episode.

No. 58050

>>58049
That must be trump-chan

No. 58051

>>58043
A FTM is still a Tranny, so stop saying kill all Trannies

Tranny: Transsexual, a FTM is a Transsexual

No. 58052

>>58051
Nta but someone can say say kill trannies and also think that tifs can post here. They just probably won't have a good time here though

No. 58053

>>58051
for the most part I know nonnas refer to the male trannies when saying that. you should read the tim thread for some peaking if you're not a troon.

No. 58054

>>58051
trannies get the rope

No. 58055

>>58053
what is a "Troon"

No. 58057

this is a bullying website!!!!!!!!!!

No. 58058

>>>/ot/1588762

Lol, he's back

No. 58059

its terrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No. 58060

>>58051
Many of us refer exclusively to TIMs when we say trannies because they're so notorious, and it should be obvious that they're worse than TIFs.

No. 58062

>>58051
kill all tranies. ftm included. cope seethe and bind
>>58043
why are ftm allowed tho? they're clearly shitting up the place, look at the tif personalityfag spewing TRA shit all over

No. 58063

They are being really mean to me in /w/ and hurting my feelings

No. 58064

This is a transphobic website?

No. 58065

File: 1685154286689.png (69.75 KB, 748x600, 65D26EC3-6B48-45BF-8AB3-A8BFE4…)


No. 58066

Hi! TIFchan here. I didn't break the rules hence why I wasn't banned. I backed off when told and the situation is over. Plus I'd prefer if mods cracked down on misogyny towards TIFs like what >>58062 said. I don't really care about if any of you hate trannies? It comes with the territory, and you do you. But consistency is a virtue and if it's misogynistic to say those things about any woman who isn't a TIF, it should not fly for TIFs either. I apologize about causing an uproar, though.

No. 58067

>>58066
personalityfagging should be against the rules. it's basically namefagging-lite (which is already against the rules)

No. 58069

Can a janny please close this bait thread that retarded newfags are hilariously taking seriously?
>>>/ot/1588856

No. 58070

>>58067
Is it not literally the same thing? That anon is insufferable

No. 58071

Honestly I kind of want a general no tranny rule at this point, even if the tranny is an actual woman just so that TIF-chan can fuck off forever.

No. 58072

>>58067
afaik previous personalityfags have been banned under global rule #4 (stay anon). announcing yoirself or making your posts obvious goes against the principle of anonymity.
can't wait to see that whiny entitled aiden get perma'd lmao
>>58071
agreed. all trannies afe insufferable attention whores anyway. nothing of value would be lost

No. 58073

>>58071
I have a question. I'm tired, so I'm probably more retarded than usual. What, specifically, makes me insufferable? I'd like to learn so I can cut that shit out. As far as I know I'm relatively well liked when I'm not posting anything regarding GID or troons, which almost every time is posted on CC by me instead of here, where I'm not dogpiled. The most recent exception is because I let slip an unnecessary detail that I never peaked in the vent thread, which caused several anons to sperg out, in which I further sperged in response. Which was not okay, and caused unnecessary drama.

No. 58074

Hello I am a student writing a report for my class. Does this website "traffic in transphobia and racism?" I need to ask for my school, thank you for answering me.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 58075

I just realized I'm treating the celebricows thread as a chatroom and I shouldn't do that. I deliberately posted a comment with the intent to delete it in 2 minutes, and said so in the comment. Won't do that again

No. 58076

>>58074
Don't

No. 58077

>>58073
You make everything about you. Shut up and move on. You're supposed to be completely anonymous but you think you're special, in typical troon fashion.

No. 58078

>>58074
Whatever you do, don't mention this site's name or anything that could lead up to people finding it easily. You don't know the amount of rape threats, gore/porn and sometimes even gore-porn raid we already get on here from a bunch of men angry about there being a female-only space which they aren't allowed to invade. Also, you can visit the mtf and ftm threads on /snow to get an idea about all that 'transphobia', don't miss the previous threads or read just two-three posts though — you won't ever understand anyone's point of view without knowing the entire context and the reason that caused it.

No. 58079

>>58074
don’t

No. 58080

>>58079
Samefag why is it always this site people want to write articles on? Y’all go to 4chan or something.

No. 58081

Fuck I think I reported non-saged posts bc I thought I was not in /ot/ but I was. I keep bouncing around and fucking up sage for myself too reeeee

No. 58082

Please tell this book sperg to stop obsessing over where the book is published and whether they like Chris being called an author or not. >>>/w/298222

No. 58084

>>58082
no1currs about chris abroad's stupid book, you absolute children in /w/ need to take a time out

No. 58085

Hello! Hello there I am a student working on a report for my class. I am hoping some people here can respond to my poll.
Would you rank this website as 1 to 10 of the following topics?
Topic 1: Transphobia
Topic 2: Racism
Topic 3: Bullying

Thanks you so much for replying my poll! It really helps with my project.

No. 58087

>>58082
no1currs about chris abroad's stupid book, you absolute children in /w/ need to take a time out

No. 58089

>>58084
>>58087
This is the complaints thread.

No. 58096

>>58035
I actually agree that according to the rules, you are correct. And that also only says they cannot announce themselves. I think the rules should be more explicit that no males or tims allowed, though obviously there’s no real way to enforce that (other than banning users that out themselves).

Kinda related but I don’t think TRAs, libfems, tradthots etc should be banned (don’t know if they are rn but many users seems to think they should be). I don’t agree with them but this is not a radfem site with a political agenda, even if most users are radfem-adjacent.

No. 58097

Some retard is posting some weird ass AI pictures with some weird ass text that I refuse to read and try to comprehend for the sake of my sanity. Please make it disappear already.

No. 58102

File: 1685173315514.jpg (41 KB, 617x579, Screenshot_20230527-124039_Sam…)

Can I ask why was I banned four days ago?( I just noticed this now kek I don't stay on lolcow 24/7) I thought you were supposed to bump threads when there's cp on the front page?

No. 58109

>>58102
we don't bump threads without a reason

No. 58111

>>58109
But I bumped it so the cp would be hidden?or atleast removed from the front page? Did you read

No. 58113

>>58111
did you say it was specifically for that reason? no, retard, so it was redtexted. it's not rocket science

No. 58115

>>58113
Oh OK! Thanks for clarifying

No. 58118

please ban the moid posting constantly about wanting desantis to be president already for fuck's sake

No. 58128

Please ban the retarded anon in Jvlog tinfoiling about nobody liking the UK The Office
>>>/w/298247

No. 58129

You have a rogue mod in the Onision thread who hides the fact that Onision is posting there as his fursona "Anonymous Gene"

No. 58131

>>58129
Kek "fursona"
But yeah I think that mods should check the IPs (and cookies etc.) in that thread.

No. 58132

How come post leftcows #42 was locked and deleted? Are there red scare fan mods now kek?

No. 58133

>>58132
Do you have a screenshot?

No. 58135

>>58133
There was a leftcows #42 but I couldn’t get a screenshot of it before the thread was deleted

No. 58136


No. 58138

you're literally the dumbest

No. 58143

>>58136
If that’s the thread I don’t blame farmhands for deleting it

No. 58145

school anon is now spamming pro tranny propaganda in the other /meta/ thread

No. 58159

>>58145
I misinterpreted one of their posts and thought it was a normal anon so I replied to it seriously. Fucking schizo lol

No. 58173

Batshit Abroad In Japan book sperging in Jvlog by an ESL-chan who can't let the book thing drop, it's not milk it's just some Chris Broad reddit superfan sperging about the fact the book can be ordered on Amazon UK (no1currs)

No. 58176

>>58173
It's a fucking samefag who is sperging about it constantly, this book isn't milky just because anon can't find it on Amazon US or whatever bullshit country they come from. And if anons are going to derail and call anons WKs then I hope they all cop bans too. It's clear the derailers keep desperately trying to make this seem like redditors are posting when they aren't. Shitposters need to find another excuse to keep derailing because the reddit takes aren't cutting it and the larping as cows and posting on their behalf to try and create milk isn't working either. Let the thread die if there's no active milk

No. 58177

>>58176
the one sperging isn't the one pointing out that the book is simply not carried on amazon in the US, it's the samefag constantly posting that the book is the TOP OF THE LIST and A HUGE SUCCESS and ALL THE ORDERS ARE FROM THE USA (though it's not available for purchase on Amazon in the US)

THAT is the sperging anon

No. 58178

>>58177
It's a success. complaining that it isn't isn't going to change anything. Being combative over something like this makes no sense, anon. Move on about the book.

No. 58179

Please ban the book anons, all of them.

>>>/w/298323
>>>/w/298324

No. 58180

>>58178
a "success" kek that's hilarious
a "success" literally nobody has heard of

No. 58181

Ban the tinfoiling anon who won't STFU about Chris Broad's fake book already, claiming it's a huge success in the USA when it's not even available for purchase there.

You aren't supposed to promote things on LC. The Chris book sperg is trying to viral market the book here.

No. 58182


No. 58183

I think it's clear anons are spamming the Jvloggers thread to try and lock it to max. This is the state of the thread the entire past year. Really think mods/admin need to reevaluate the point of the thread.

No. 58184

So mods are just gonna sit on their hands when an unhinged book sperg won't STFU about a cow's book and keeps posting and posting and posting about it? Claiming it's some huge success and on all these lists that only exist in a single country? So we're all just supposed to sit back and let them shit up the thread OVER AND OVER AND OVER??

No. 58185

>>58184
Can you stop spamming the thread already with your screenshots that you're obsessively demanding people say he's a failure and so is his book?

No. 58186

File: 1685255177070.jpg (100.13 KB, 854x862, MODSARESTUPID.jpg)


No. 58187

>>58185
Whoever is spamming the thread with endless posts about Chris's book being some huge success is the one causing 99% of the problem, not the screenshots proving the book's not available in the US, which is a FACT and proven by those shots. The book sperg will not STFU about his book and keeps saying its a huge success, it's destroying the whole thread.

No. 58188

>>58187
The fact that you're this mad that people find him a success makes this whole thing absolutely embarrassing for you. I hope you cop a ban on all your devices since the samefagging is so obvious.

No. 58189

>>58187
This.
Someone is off their meds in love with Chris and typical WK behavior. Mods need to show up asap in that thread, it needs to be detonated immediately.

No. 58190

>>58188
your samefagging is off the chain nonnie, why do you love Chris Broad so much kek

No. 58191

>>58188
Nobody but you "finds him a success" kek

Clearly.

No. 58192

omg the chris redditors are completely insane about this book shit. news flash Chris-otaku-chan, no1currs about his book so you're really embarrassing yourself right now, please please we beg you to go back to reddit at once!

No. 58193

>>58183
I don't think so, I think it's like one anon who won't let it drop about their master Chris's book kek - probably Chris paid them to do viral marketing



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]