[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/w/ - vloggers, lolita, cosplay

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password
(For post deletion)

New farmhands wanted, click to apply!

File: 1681307359965.jpg (1.56 MB, 3742x6679, 1681306665681.jpg)

No. 291816

Previous threads:
>>>/w/257769
>>121374
>>40202
>>22555
>>>/w/179758
>>>/w/199602
>>>/w/209757

Taylor R is a “hardworking” “self-made” “successful” former model and Youtuber from Canada whose main claim to fame used to be copying Dakota’s embarrassing 2012-2015 living doll phase. She’s since abandoned this endeavor to copy Casey Neistat, the Kardashians, Jenna Marbles, Safiya Nygaard, and Valeria Lipovesky, among others. In the past, she focused on bad DIY videos and boring 30-minute vlogs in which she recaps serious challenges from her week, including hiring assistants, eating food, drinking coffee, exercising, seeing various scam artists (fortune tellers, naturopathic healers).

Her husband, Tom Lip is a successful businessman. One of his companies, MenClub, was exposed for featuring at least 8 underage (age 12-16) girls in skimpy clothing on their site. After news of this spread, Taylor made two videos defending the right of men to ogle children (it’s “cultural”! Don’t like, don’t click!), stated it’s just one or two people who hate her, and insisted that she was never an escort, a claim no one ever made seriously.

Taylor herself has started her own business, TOAT, which is, alas, currently completely abandoned for pandemic and motherhood reasons.

Ever since her successful carrier(s) faded, she focused on her IVF "journey", more about which can be found in previous threads. After it came mini lectures about Traditional Chinese medicine and post-partum confinement, presented as universal truth and law.

After noticing a decline in interest to the new content, she suddenly remembered that she had many cultural shocks when she first moved to Hong Kong a decade ago and started making reels and TikToks about the newest trending topic, accompanied by walls of text explaining the said customs.

Currently she's busy rewriting her past with the help of misleading story captions and reposting year-old postpartum content. Somehow her body changes were the first thing that she found important to focus on during the weeks leading to her much-awaited baby's first birthday. Even weirder was her decision to organize a sad, grey birthday party without any guests a week early just to have content for an instagram post ready beforehand.


Beware the white knights and stans in Taylor’s thread. Focus on the milk and ignore the filler, farmers.

Taylor’s Links:
https://www.facebook.com/Taylor.R.Official
https://www.instagram.com/taytay_xx/
https://www.youtube.com/user/TaylorR1488
https://www.tiktok.com/@tay_richard
https://twitter.com/iamtay_tay
https://toat.com
https://www.instagram.com/toat.co

Tom Lip's controversial site for men: https://www.menclub.hk/

Old links (no longer updated):
http://lovetaylor.com/
http://www.weibo.com/taylorrichard
http://lineblog.me/taylor/
https://ameblo.jp/iamtaytay/
http://taytay.zipper.jp/
http://www.cchan.tv/clipper/taylor

No. 291837

>>291816
That third pic… she speaks Chinese at a baby level? And is married to a guy who can barely piece together English words? They can't even have a proper conversation together. How can anyone see their relationship as anything besides golddigger/sugaring?

No. 291850

>>291837
Dumb nitpicking

No. 291860

Did this thread need to be made? The previous one is full of just nitpicks and actual fans of taylor. None of the recent summary is milk.

No. 291900

>>291860
And just complaints about watching old stories being posted. Don't watch them then? She's posted recent stuff too, its not all old content. I don't see why OP even bothered adding it in. It's just anons tinfoiling that its because of views and nitpicking the same posts from 2 threads ago because of it.

No. 292324

Thank god she had a son and not a girl with her creepy ugly scrote

No. 292342

>>292324
The fact that, that's what you think of immediately..

No. 292405

>>291860
yes because new threads need to be made once they hit a certain amount of replies. don't like it don't post in them. non-milk has been saged pretty consistently, so you're just actively seeking it out at this point.

No. 292406

>>292324
Why? It's sad either way. Having a kid with a man that old has a much higher risk of autism, ADHD and various other disorders.

No. 292665

>>292406
That's not what's happening, tinfoil medfag. The baby is fine.

No. 292733

>>292665
as if you can tell at 13 months lmao

No. 292769

>>292733
Jesus, that's the stupidest thing to say. There's a lot of things wrong in Taylor's and Tom's relationship, but the baby's health is not one of them. Chill.

No. 292855

>>292769
nta but the original post mentions adhd and autism, neither of which get diagnosed at age 13 months. so you can't say one way or the other and viciously defending or attacking his health is retarded. But it's not wrong to point out that babies born to older fathers have higher risk of these problems, and icsi version of ivf raises it even higher, since it damages the egg to help weak sperm get in.(medfagging)

No. 292950

>>292855
Nta, but you're medfagging a baby. Why derail about stuff that hasn't even happened and we have no proof or indicators of so its just tinfoil?

No. 292957

>>292950
stop calling it medfagging or some personal insult/diagnosis against a child. You're trying to infight when the original ayrt (not me) wrote that advanced paternal age
>has a much higher risk of autism, ADHD and various other disorders.
This is fact. Pointing out risk w/r/t a couple who plan to have more kids is not a personal attack on the one they have.
>the baby is fine
how do you know?
>stop medfagging a baby
no one is
>that's the stupidest thing
because someone pointed out adhd and autism isn't usually diagnosed at 13 months anyway.

Yeah literally no one is attacking the kid, but nice attempt to twist even the blandest insult against Tom into some cruel „medfagging“ about Levi. No, idiot, no one wrote that Levi has any of these things. They said there is a risk with Tom's cruddy ancient sperm and they're not wrong.

No. 293066

File: 1681848808676.jpeg (87.81 KB, 828x1412, 2F741347-1361-4609-AF9B-F6BC2E…)

A mom playing with her toddler? So wacky and crazy!!…when this is that out of the ordinary, you know she doesn’t play with him that much

No. 293165

>>293066
What's the point of this?

No. 293386

File: 1682024047636.jpg (214.27 KB, 1079x1814, Screenshot_20230420_135309_Ins…)

I bet anons are going to complain that this was more of a birthday, just for the dog, than what the kid got for his birthday.

No. 293496

>>293386
Ain't you an anon, too? kek But spot on.
Plus this tumbles the notion that "he won't remember it anyway" or "he doesn't understand what's going on so why does it matter". As if the dog does.

No. 293870

I didnt take a Screenshot of it but recently she took Levi for passport pictures to travel with him. She posted the passport picture afterwards, I still think about it and how wrong it feels? Generally it’s so weird to post his face everywhere. But isn’t it potentially risky to post a passport picture?

No. 293881

since tom is the root of their infertility issues, is it possible levi's biological dad is a sperm donour?(unsaged bait)

No. 293882

>>293881
sage your idiocy. No. They had icsi ivf. Stop baiting.

No. 293898

>>293870
A passport photo of a baby? Anon, of course it's not really risky. Do you think an identity thief is going to pretend to be Levi? I personally wouldn't plaster my child everywhere but honestly, he's such a small infant that it kind of doesn't matter. Certainly once he gets old enough to get embarassed by being online he should be left out of her content but he's just a baby. Taylor is cringey but I don't think she's ever put her kid in danger just by putting his photo out there. it's a matter of personal taste imo, not safety

No. 293902

>>293898
>>293870
This is an imageboard and I can't find this happening either

No. 293939

File: 1682280847989.png (895.92 KB, 864x1220, Screenshot_20230420-193839.png)

>>293870
well in contrast to the others, I do find it weird. Might be cultural differences, my country is very strict about protecting privacy of children especially. And nefarious people steal kids' identities as well as adults'. It's not a good idea to put a kid's passport pic online.
>>293902
it was an IG story and I didn't screenshot it because that feels weird. Have a collage of all Taylor's fav pix of Rosie in honor of her 10th birthday instead.

No. 293962

>>293939
So you can't blot out the passport photo of his face and stealable details but other photos of her baby are fine? Was there anything even there to be concerned? Sounds like anons can't read what's actually important for passports. I'm assuming she only posted the front of it and the picture. That's not very weird and again, this is an imageboard. If you have important posts, screencap them. The excuse is shit when its cleat no stealable info was posted.

No. 293969

>>293962
I wasn't the OP. I was replying to confirm it happened and give my opinion. I didn't screencap the IG story, which is now gone. idk what your problem is, I can't go back in time and screenshot the story, nor do I feel it's right to repost a child's passport photo on LC. You don't want any discussion you don't like, just say that.

No. 293970

>>293969
No one is stopping discussion because you're not able to post anything to have a discussion about. Those photos aren't milky that you shared from facebook. Anons already discussed the instagram posts she did and stories about Rosie if you bothered lurking. You don't have to be this lazy as a contributor then chalk it up to some bullshit about protecting the kid after posting a photo that has her kid.

No. 293976

>>293970
I posted a photo along with chiming in with my own opinon about >>293870, which is not my post. I do not have a screenshot of the story being discussed, but that doesn't mean I can't say what I think about it and what people in my country might think. I am plenty acquainted with the thread and there's nothing wrong with adding a photo to a saged post.

No. 294018

>>293970
Let Kiki talk

No. 294026

>>294018
lmao nonnieeeeeeeee.

No. 294046

>>294026
She reported the post and I copped a hi cow ban for it(ban evasion)

No. 294084

Damn nonas sorry to bring up the passport picture. I guess the overall consensus is pics of kids are ok on the internet?

No. 294101

>>294084
Um, no? I wouldn't post pictures of my kids (and their passport photo) on the internet, but to each their own. If Taylor is comfortable with it, then who am I do be disdained on her behalf.

No. 294231

File: 1682414385356.png (499.36 KB, 864x1512, Screenshot_20230425-111733.png)

it's pretty bad to let your dog get so overgrown it can't see. picrel is screenshot from reel: https://www.instagram.com/reel/CracMLSAXHs/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

No. 294232

>>294231
Jesus poor rosie. At least trim the eyes at home so your dog can see.

No. 294234

>>294232
I mean, would it kill her to take the dog to the hairdresser's more often? It doesn't have to be twice a year. It's just two additional drives in her "busy" schedule. How hard can it be?

No. 294235

File: 1682424559568.png (227.05 KB, 864x1678, Screenshot_20230425-140344.png)

Just glanced at Menclub. They're back to showcasing underage girls. usually using pics from even earlier if they are talking about a 17/18yo.
Link: https://menclub.hk/mobile/article/article.php?cat=girls&aid=31348

No. 294239

>>294232
This is after they fluffed him up before a trim. Its really obvious.. Also some vets/groomers will not do cuts until the hair gets a certain length. Weird nitpicking kek

No. 294242

>>294235
This seems really badly translated by Google. Several times it calls her "him". She's also 19 here in your photo if I'm doing the math right. 2020 she was 16 when she entered some pageant. Did you not read this, anon?

No. 294248

>>294242
she was born in October 2004, she's not 19. Every site out there says that. I'm sorry you're choosing to go by some random age she won some "2020 competition" instead of her actual birthday. Have you forgotten when the 2020 Olympics were held?

No. 294250

File: 1682436427992.png (575.69 KB, 538x687, Screenshot 2023-04-25 171432.p…)

>>294239
it's not obvious, look at the pics from easter. They have this huge barrette above its eyes (bc otherwise she wouldn't be able to see at all) and in some pics it's no longer there. Easter was weeks ago, so her fur has grown even more. But go on and defend your weeb against the mildest of critiques, I guess.

No. 294251

File: 1682436574427.png (342.99 KB, 535x494, Screenshot 2023-04-25 173008.p…)

>>294250
meant to use this one but w/e

No. 294255

>>294248
So she's 19 if she was born in 2004.. anon. Its 2023. She's almost 20.

No. 294263

>>294235
They were featuring underage girls not long after the blow up with Taylor's fans and the promise that they'd be more careful, so this isn't new even if this girl is underage.

No. 294264

>>294263
She's not underage. She's almost 20.

No. 294267

>>294255
you really can't do math, can you? Her birthday is in October. She is 18. Unbelievable how you defend this pedo crap. Some of the photos are from when she was younger.

No. 294286

>>294267
The whole Men'w Club post is a reach. You want anons to assume what photos are possibly, not confirmed underage? No one is being a pedo apologist. But the model in the photos is over 18. Can you prove what photos are underage, anon, because you're the one who was looking at the article.

No. 294292

File: 1682459865448.png (Spoiler Image, 290.02 KB, 864x675, Screenshot_20230425-234555.png)

>>294286
>since you were looking at the article
Oh shut the hell up, I'm not a fucking connoisseur of coom material, I just possess a working brain. You're hell-bent on saying she's almost 20 (a gross lie) and now you want other people to spoonfeed you which pictures were taken when? You're a real gem, defending this shit. You can use google like anyone else, but also your mind: MC did an article immediately after she turned 18 here: https://www.menclub.hk/mobile/article/article.php?cat=girls&aid=30718

So you tell me what age all those photos were taken? 17 or younger. Many from her gravure shit. The barely there colorful striped bikini in the article linked above is from a shoot for picrel, a coom magazine published when she was 17. I'm not digging through all this garbage just so you can defend it further, but how many sunny bikini shoots has she done outside between October 20 and April 3? Some of the shots from the previously linked article were also from earlier in 2022.

It's ok, anon. Another recent article talks about how another big-boobed girl just graduated from high school. I'm sure you can tell me all about how she's practically middle aged and how google translate writing he instead of she makes any point about her age invalid.

No. 294293

>>294264
She is 18. Insane of you to lie about this when you can search her name online and find this out

No. 294294

>>294264
She is 18. Insane of you to lie about this when you can search her name online and find this out

No. 294300

>>294046
She reported my post updating that she reported my post(take it to /meta/)

No. 294302

>>294292
You used non-Men's Club photos from a company that isn't MC to try to prove your point of gravure materials. All I keep hearing is she was 18 when MC interviewed her. I'd get it if this was JK stuff again, but this isn't even close to being the same thing as men daydreaming about being in middle school again.

No. 294303

File: 1682467524859.png (11.33 KB, 820x206, 19 going on 20.png)

>>294293
>2022 article about turning 18
>2023 means turned 19 in October 2022
>Going to be 20 in Oct 2023.

No. 294306

>>294251
what a beautiful baby awww

No. 294312

File: 1682471931976.png (15.02 KB, 863x239, Screenshot_20230426-031106.png)

>>294303
this is the last time I'm replying to your idiocy. She turned 18 around Oct 19, 2022. Why are you continuing to lie about her age based on some incorrectly dated shit article? Look at her IG, which confirms her birthday.
>>294302
It wasn't an interview. MC doesn't take photos of girls in this section themselves, they repost from other sources and write coom commentary on how she was already busty at age 15/16. The pictures they used to illustrate their recap of her life span the time from 16-18yo. You can do your own research on where the rest of the photos are taken from, you will find them on various sites and forums. The publication dates of her gravure books don't lie either.

No. 294313

>>294312
Take the hint, no1currs

No. 294342

>>294302
>>294264
>>294313
Just another moid crying no1curr after proven wrong. MC is a trash moid bait site that steals content and photos of young girls that low key had a pipeline of men who paid for escorts.

No. 294365

>>294312
>write coom commentary on how she was already busty at age 15/16.
I think your posts would be more effective if you included caps and translations of that kind of commentary.

No. 294371

>>294365
So I can get banned for derailing the thread? No thanks. Here's one from 2020: >>146734
>The excitement with which he describes her previous gravure debut (at age 11) is gross. He goes out of his way to say she had F cups at age 12.

No. 294391

please stop the age sperging. Anyone continuing after this will get banned.

No. 295562

File: 1683283031443.jpg (1.68 MB, 5000x5000, 1683279886174.jpg)

Who was asking about Tom's tent hoarding hobby? You got your answer kek
Doesn't he look lovely? The man of every girl's dream./s

No. 295606

>>295562
lmao they're such a mismatched couple, jesus. i wonder how many people assume he paid for her when they're walking down the street together. she has a weird complex.

No. 295665

>>295606
>i wonder how many people assume he paid for her
I think it won't be an exaggeration to assume that most people think exactly that lol

No. 295666

>>295606
I mean he is paying for her, so they would be right (people probably assume she's Russian though). There's no way they would be together if he wasn't loaded. The only confusing thing is why Taylor didn't choose an attractive loaded guy in HK, but I think she had very low self esteem, especially dating-wise, when she met Tom. She's also always been very awkward about sexuality, so I think she didn't have to confidence to go after someone actually on her level, looks-wise.

Irrelevant but I dated someone who reminds me a lot of Tom, even down to the weird kermit voice, it's uncanny. Watching them feels like watching a weird alternate timeline.

No. 295672

>>295666
Tom was totally her backup the whole time she tried to hook up with other guys. The loaded non-kermit scrotes in HK aren't into the dolly thing and are expected to marry up into more money or big family connections, with a union relevant enough to get published in the papers.

No. 295677

File: 1683361385844.jpg (205.44 KB, 1080x1884, IMG_20230505_165438.jpg)

For a self-proclaimed foodie she's very bad at describing dishes. She just adds "-y" to a given food/vegetable/ingredient and calls it a day. Ah, that and the predictable "not too sweet" and "crunchy yet chewy" cards.

No. 295678

>>295665
How dare you?! Don't you know she makes her own money and is a business lady with her own successful company.
In one of their old videos she even claimed she's actually his sugar mama" lmao I'm still not over it.

No. 295679

>>295672
you mean her best friend Jess? lol she must be infinitely jealous.

No. 295713

>>295562
there’s something about their giant, empty-ass bookshelf that’s so funny to me. nothing more than a few untouched coffee table books, an H&M vase or whatever here and there, and a pile of remote controls. a perfect representation of their personalities and interests lol

No. 295724

>>295678
I would love the source on this kek

No. 295738

>>295677
I'd take this over her fawning over Chinese medicine and "healthy" food any given day, tbh.

No. 295747

>>295713
A lot of people don't use bookshelves for only books, this isn't the 1800s and she isn't an avid reader, if anything is a display piece for other items.

>>295677
It looks like it should so idk what the nitpick is over. Explain?

No. 295756

>>295666
>The only confusing thing is why Taylor didn't choose an attractive loaded guy in HK
You know not all or even most Asian men have a fetish for white women, right? Even the ones who do are typically willing to date/bang a white woman, but not actually marry her. I doubt there were tons of options of men with an intense enough fetish to marry her AND super rich at the same time.

No. 295760

>>295747
their home is probably the most soulless place I've ever seen, deal with the fact that not everyone agrees with your opinion of Taylor. The food comment is about her inability to even describe a dish, it is a tepid critique and you don't need to get your knickers in a twist over it.
>>295562
what did Tom buy this massive water pistol for? Did he play with it alone? Levi's probably 6 years from being able to hold that.

No. 295781

>>295677
>the predictable "not too sweet" and "crunchy yet chewy"
lmao spot on it should be a drinking game.

>>295760
totally agree about the soulless interior design. sometimes (but very rarely) these grey, industrial homes liven up after years of living in it, because people tend to fill it with personal touches, family photos etc. but their place remained as cold and sterile as it was when they first showed it. it looks more like a warehouse than a home.

i think it's fair to assume that he bought it for himself kek even the sleazy ogre has an inner child. may be it's his infantile side that clicks with taylor.

No. 295797

>>295562
I think this is the most personality he has ever shown in a photo. Buying cool water guns for himself is kind of endearing, like you kind of see a lingering bit of his inner child.

No. 295799

>>295781
>>295760
I miss when Taylor "lived alone" in Japan and would do actual fun DIY decoration stuff for holidays and what-not. I wonder if she is not allowed to do that anymore.

No. 295803

File: 1683476525868.png (402.97 KB, 864x1382, Screenshot_20230507-181614.png)

>>295799
She's allowed I'm sure but it hits different when people know she's not a teen / very early 20s like they thought back in 2015. I mean people should do what they want, but she was decorating her room as if she were just heading off to college… while she was actually 26-29 depending on the year. It's also not really endearing once you know she never lived in that room, just used it to film and host people.

Realistically, no one with a house featured in Tatler Asia and other news sources is going to be displaying hot-glued doll heads or pumpkins painted on top of "last season's" Liz Lisa bedsheets.

I'm hopelessly stupid about real estate and decorating costs, but the SCMP article sources some of the decor in Tom and Taylor's condo. https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/design-interiors/article/3210255/inside-taylor-rs-dream-home-aman-inspired-en-suite-open-kitchen-balcony-outdoor-dining-and-rooftop
The article also reveals that the original floorplan had 4 bedrooms (not including the study). One was sacrificed in the remodelling, and another got renovated into Levi's nursery, meaning there is a third bedroom we've never seen or ever heard of. Someone's gonna ree but it's probably for the domestic helper. I'm still puzzled as to why we've never seen the decorations for Levi's nursery; she mentioned once she decorated it with big cats (tigers, cheetahs, lions, maybe a jungle theme?) and that sounds interesting enough to show people if it's finished.

No. 295819

>>295803
The third bedroom is Tom's gaming room, that is supposed to be a guest room. I think the nanny/domestic helper sleeps in another room, probably adjacent to the second bathroom she bathes Levi in.

No. 295842

File: 1683514221576.jpeg (165.26 KB, 828x1443, 2CD4C51A-E64E-4906-81BA-B141DE…)

This is on the front page of CNN rn lol As if Taylor didn’t do this to just have a nanny around and get views on YouTube
Also why would carol get calls from the US and UK (like the article says) for voodoo confinement practice? Are people really going to pay her travel fare to do this shit?

No. 295843

>>295842
It's not voodoo. Anons have been told several times the benefits to this. The only woo thing is the goop shit like only cold food and washing with ginger. The stomach tying, no working out.. these are real things that benefit mothers that places like the UK and US dint give a fuck about because of how obsessed with women going to back to work we are.

No. 295851

>>295843
Wrapping isn’t part of confinement though, that’s a practice in the USA too. Confinement ultimately is no going outside and follow all these woowoo rules. Doctors in the US will also tell you not to workout postpartum

No. 295861

>>295842
Did she provide the absolute blurriest screencaps for this article? How weird. It's half of a propaganda article and half a bit critical of the practice. But these photos are awful.
>Richard and Chan declined to share the cost of Chan’s services. Few entities track the pricing of nannies in Hong Kong on a consistent basis because most negotiations are directly between clients and the nannies.
heh, yep, of course they wouldn't share that! Taylor can't have people knowing how much it actually cost.
>The kind of care Richard received is expensive, whether the new parents live in Hong Kong or elsewhere.
This is shit for women who don't really have to work anyway, let's be honest. If you have money to blow on two months of a live-in cook and nanny, you aren't being pressured to return to work right away, or you don't really work. Nothing wrong with that but normal people can't afford to hire someone like this to enforce a bunch of woo rules.

>>295843
>Anons have been told several times
uh, by you? so what? newsflash: you're an anon. No one has to believe anything you say. I sure don't remember you posting any credible sources for all your claims about confinement and foods and wrapping. Just reeing about how yt peepol are so stupid and don't know about wrapping or whatever the hell you felt salty about. Frequently you didn't even watch Taylor's content about it and started spouting your own crap about whatever the topic was. So unless you have some sources, no1currs confinement-chan. I also remember you defending the worst of the woo: no cold foods, drafts, keeping warm, no leaving home, not to mention TCM.

No. 295879

>>295851
I'm talking about how anons have claimed it is though. We've had big discussions about wrapping.

No. 295895

>>295842
I wonder who payed for this ad because I highly doubt the CNN was interested in doing an article on the topic and Taylor happened to be the only person they could interview on the topic? Kinda hard to believe.

No. 295896

>>295895
She's been repromoting it all which means new veiws. Could just be a picked up segment and not paid. Those types of websites cover dumb TikToks too.

No. 295900

>>295842
apparently it exists in the US too already

No. 295916

>>295895
it is odd how she's always front and center for things that aren't even her idea. i have a feeling she does call these news outlets.

"everyone is doing this new trend, christmas tree brows! picture of taylor" no, it was just a few beauty vloggers, and taylor didn't even come up with it.

>>295879
no one is talking about wrapping, we're talking about confinement. keep up.

No. 295924

>>295916
CNN really doesn't give a fuck about her and wouldn't do it based on a phone call. This is their trending crap for clickbaits.

No. 295925

>>295924
it's by someone based in HK (CNN Asia), and she's been pushing it all so much that it wouldn't surprise me if her assistant or Tom sent them some communication. Otherwise why now? It's been more than a year since she did the confinement. It's not trending anywhere else. Funny how she won't divulge the price - why is it a big secret?
>wouldn't do it based on a phone call
how do you know?

No. 295930

>>295925
She probably won't say a price because no matter what she says, there will be someone out there who thinks it's not enough, even if it is a good wage compared to other hirees like lower-income citizens. No reason to welcome needless harassment over it. People can just look it up if they are interested.

And I don't know if they didn't call, but anons can't prove they did either. It's weird it's there, but tinfoiling if it was bought or not doesn't help with anything. The best they could do on their side is request a submission that isn't a guaranteed article for publishing.

No. 295965

>>295930
>She probably won't say a price because no matter what she says, there will be someone out there who thinks it's not enough
um, that's pretty unlikely, you know that she doesn't want people to know how much money she dropped on that, it doesn't fit with the "relatable" image she cultivates. I mean honestly, you think she decided not to tell CNN the price because oh nos someone will call it slave labor? Come on, stop licking her ass.

Speculating about how she got this publicity isn't tinfoil. Tinfoil is a claim that has no basis in reality - it's not just anything you personally don't like. You declaring how CNN works without any experience is more tinfoilly than saying Taylor's own PR people might have had a hand in her PR. And that's literally all posters here are discussing.

No. 295998

She's not telling the price because it's a secret kept in the industry. It's probably not regulated, so they negotiate with nannies beforehand and there's no set price.
I agree with the "uwu relatable" point, too. She tries to push it as something absolutely necessary and expected, when in reality it's still something for those with disposable income.

No. 296010

File: 1683643321432.jpg (132.61 KB, 1080x1010, Screenshot_20230509_074045_Chr…)

>>295998
Someone didn't even try reading the article. Even a Google search leads you to it. They didn't say their rate but it's not because it's a kept secret in the industry when its a massive industry. It would bring harassment because some people didn't think it was enough, especially because it's China.

No. 296014

>>296010
you are just bullshitting, anon. It explicitly says that Taylor and Carol wouldn't say how much Taylor paid Carol, and the article even says
>The kind of care Richard received is expensive, whether the new parents live in Hong Kong or elsewhere.
So your remark about "people would say it's too little and it would provoke harassment" is bullshit. It literally says this care is expensive. I don't know why you sit in this thread to lie and defend the cows unless they are paying you to do it.

No. 296107

>>296014
It's obviously expensive. Look at picrel. Also that is what happens online.

No. 296694

File: 1683973196772.jpg (260 KB, 1080x1886, IMG_20230513_134442.jpg)

I can't believe they're still paying influencers to come and stay at their hotels as an ad. Is the business still so bad?

No. 296699

>>296694
Is this thread about Taylor or some hotel? If you want to talk about businesses being bad or desperate, there's probably a topic on it in /ot/.

No. 296708

File: 1683989350887.webm (2.96 MB, 1080x1920, 323859872_599824075417778_1663…)

>>296699
it's discussion of some lame paid staycation she took, keep up.

I wonder if the nanny came along, since Levi isn't in the treatment room with them (and their room/suite is enormous). vidrel is Tom complaining about how the baby doesn't sleep and he's tired.

No. 296756

>>296708
>Tom complaining about how the baby doesn't sleep and he's tired
They both must be so tired from looking after the baby an hour a day each kek

No. 296761

>>296708
How long do anons plan to beat this nanny business to death? We know they have a nannyat this point. It's been a year. Over a year.

No. 296825

>>296761
As long as WKs keep denying it and Taylor and Tom keep pretending they're hardworking, hands-on parents.(infighting)

No. 296851

>>296761
How long do you plan to chronically be in this thread worshipping Taylor? Seriously just go to a fan site already(infighting)

No. 296853

>>296708
The baby doesn’t sleep? Impossible! Taylor has shown us that parenthood and her life is so perfect and nothing ever goes wrong

No. 296868

>>296761
I think the point id just that Taylor makes it seem that they don’t have a help. Same thing as she was pretending ti live alone but actually lived with Tom already.

No. 296870

File: 1684097641351.png (82.1 KB, 2160x1620, 188CC9FD-4829-40D5-A68E-6E9DA7…)

>>296694
Taylor is becoming increasingly not relatable as an influencer with propaganda stunts from the HK Tourism board. Who of her followers can afford this suite?
Not sure if picrel is up to date but it can’t be that far off the mark.

No. 296879

File: 1684101480243.webm (5.27 MB, 1080x1920, 328679253_611562440909287_3101…)

Disclaimer: this is a saged discussion post. Taylor sees herself in Levi bc she gave him a brush and old compact to play with, and he played with them the way any baby would: beating them together and feeling the texture of the brush. idk how else a baby would play with old makeup, or why you'd give these to a toddler anyway. Both of those things look clean, at least… more than can be said about that dirty eyeshadow applicator on the ground (which is also a choking hazard).

No. 296888

>>296879
Yeah, noticed that, too. At first I was like "It's cute", but as the video went on I realised he was just waving the brush around and using it more like a hairbrush kek
Double kek because if her suggestion is true then doing makeup is apparently the only thing he sees her do, especially if that's what he chose to copy and she found it to be "a reflection".

No. 296899

>>296888
I guess she specifically gave him these things to play with so she could write this post about how he's a reflection of her. Strange shit.

No. 296948

>>296879
i've found a lot of taylor's recent videos with levi weird. e.g. she's getting dressed for the beach day, which is for his enjoyment (supposedly), but he's just wandering around by himself in the background of the video while she gets ready, and she doesn't even speak to him. or when showing off the fancy hotel they're staying at, he's wandering in the hallway and she just walks around him without interacting with him. there was some other video where I think she was carrying him and her phone and looking in the mirror and she was looking at her phone the whole time, never made eye contact or interacted with levi. it's just a very odd detached "get out of my way I'm making content" thing. especially weird because I think everyone thought after her giant "fertility story" she would become more of a mummy vlogger, but none of her content is really about interacting with levi. what she feeds him, what equipment she's bought him, what sad beige baby clothes he's wearing, yes, but…nothing ever really beyond that?

No. 296950

>>296948
I agree completely but have never brought this up because I don't have a kid and I'm not an influencer, and also there's someone who will visit this thread to yell at anyone who says Taylor's interaction with Levi seems off. But it's almost like she doubled down on her own self-absorption. I can understand not wanting to be "just a mom" (and she isn't! no woman is, but she is still booking jobs & stuff). But even Levi's birthday had to be "aesthetic" and all about her. I had some hope once she stopped posting as much, that maybe she'd seem happier and more into her child, but if anything it seems like she's even less interested in him now. Of course we only know what she posts, so who really knows.

No. 296963

>>296948
He’s an accessory. Just like everything else in her life.

No. 296965

>>296948
How did you think people got videos and photos of their kids a long time ago.. You follow them with a camcorder. The camcorder is now a phone. He's not 'alone'. She's letting him do things and not forcing him to stay by her side or in her arms 24/7 and locked in a stroller/carseat. He's with his parents, so what exactly is weird? He's a baby, can't talk, doesn't have birthday decisions to make because he had no interest in themes yet, its a baby. It's literally a baby.

No. 297016

>>296950
>>296948
I don't personally see anything off since Jeans seems happy in all her content, and that's all that matters imo, but a very likely reason is the vast majority of his care is done by the nanny, and Taylor actually isn't bonded in that way where more hands-on mothers are due to going through literally everything with the kid.
She does need to keep working, and being a mother is a huge enough job that a lot of people's other hobbies and jobs fall by the wayside, so I think it's better she, and anyone, gets help if they can (can be family if not a nanny) since being out of work or overwhelmed due to childcare needs is not the better option in terms of financial security and mental health.
But just a guess as to why we don't see that more familiar interaction we see with nanny-free households.
I've actually read that nannies and daycares will usually see all the milestones first, but not tell the parent so the parents think they are the first, ergo first word, first step etc will have all been with the nanny. Considering Taylor spends hours in the gym and making content every day, it's safe to assume a good portion of Jeans' day is with nanny and not Taylor.

No. 297029

>>296948
Agreed. In a lot of her videos/reels he’s just sitting watching TV too. Like girl, go play with your child, he’s only this little once. If she wants to make content with Levi she should do it in a way he’s not just in the background

No. 297031

>>297016
Please don't nickname the fucking baby, just call him Levi. It's less letters than Jeans even. That's next level autism.

No. 297038

>>297031
That's rich, given that his father's nickname is Elbow-san lmao relax, anon.

No. 297039

>>297016
>She does need to keep working
kek. Maybe for her mental health, sure. But financially, nah. She's also an influencer now, which is a flexible kind of job.
>Considering Taylor spends hours in the gym and making content every day
yes to the gym, but what content?
>Jeans
stop

No. 297040

>>297016
>nannies and daycares will usually see all the milestones first, but not tell the parent so the parents think they are the first
Oh, that's an interesting observation! It makes a lot of sense. I wonder how many moments "busy" parent Taylor (and Tom) misses and then resorts to giving the baby a makeup brush to make fake uwu content.

No. 297049

>>297038
Nicknaming the baby isn't necessary. Anon's joke isn't even funny, it just makes their whole post retarded to read.

No. 297160

>>297049
Seconded, it's not Levi's fault he's an accessory to his mother. Making fun of a baby's name leaves a bad taste in my mouth even if it wasn't meant to be mean spirited.

No. 297163

>>297160
Anon is doing it because they know some anon will be annoyed by it. Its basically lowkey bait.

No. 297192

File: 1684415664867.webm (1.04 MB, 720x1280, BC42BCD92C7EF06D7752142E22F7D2…)

>>296948
kek like this one is exactly what you noticed. Since she is a content creator, I'm surprised she didn't take his hand at the end, would have been a better way to end whatever this is.

No. 297210

>>297192
"hang on honey, stop climbing all over me. mom has to prance around in a bathing suit for the camera"

i don't get why she doesn't just get tom to watch him when she does these. it looks so bad.

No. 297225

File: 1684445742996.jpg (297.12 KB, 1080x1894, IMG_20230518_201402.jpg)

>>295677
Nta, but now I see what you meant kek. And not her dragging Tom for finding it "too cold" to eat in the previous story.

No. 297226

>>297192
yeah, i found that distasteful, too. like, if you're gonna put your kid into the video for mommy or cuteness points, at least don't treat him like an accessory.

No. 297227

>>297210
well, if she did, people would say she doesn't pay him any attention and ignores him, but this video is not any bit better lol

No. 297270

File: 1684492981060.png (1.56 MB, 864x1496, Screenshot_20230519-124329.png)

>>297225
here's the right screenshot for that "too cold" comment. I don't understand what's different though.

No. 297279

>>297270
It looks like Tom added plain rice to it.

No. 297310

>>297279
fr? Maybe I'm blind, I can't see it at all

No. 297332

>>297270
another weird translation/communication issue between the two lol. there's literally nothing different

No. 297386

Another shopping spree disguised as "thrifting". When will airheaded influencers understand that bulk buying things is the problem, buying a ton of "second hand" is not a solution to the overconsumption etc.
Also, imagine not realising you bought a jacket kek Am I to believe she has to budget and be mindful when spending? Lol she didn't notice she spent money? And it's not something small or unnoticeable.

No. 297389

File: 1684587859224.jpg (Spoiler Image, 245.89 KB, 1080x1892, IMG_20230520_170326.jpg)

Lmao first she posts about the baby being like her because he was holding a makeup brush, now he's like her because he's using a credit card. Is she unconsciously telling that all she ever does is shop and doll up? Is there nothing else he can copy while watching her?

No. 297398

File: 1684592371767.jpg (89.28 KB, 827x1080, IMG_20230520_154851.jpg)

>>297386
I wonder what she's busy doing that gets into the filming's way.

No. 297402

>>297389
Kylie Jenner said the exact same thing to Stormi so she’s copying her. It’s not the first time either.

No. 297417

>>297402
Oh, thank you for the insight. So she's still following whatever the Kardashians do. Interesting. That's surprisingly consistent for her kek

No. 297419

>>297417
>>297402
It's a kids toy card..

No. 297420

>>297398
Working out and shopping. What else do you think? Lol

No. 297421

File: 1684602213801.webm (9.34 MB, 1080x1920, 10000000_1393878264517156_1557…)

the level of conversation in the Tom/Taylor household is truly something else. I've never seen a mother so desperate for her toddler to notice a different haircut. This is a strange interaction, especially alongside the previous videos with Levi getting in the way of Taylor's preening.

No. 297422

File: 1684602393503.png (Spoiler Image, 620.33 KB, 864x1920, Screenshot_20230520-100343.png)

and then we have this jumpscare. Because we all look like this after a dental cleaning

No. 297423

>>297422
>>297421
lol It's teeth and getting bangs cut, what do you want to discuss exactly?

No. 297428

>>297417
>>297419

Specifically Kylie Jenner. She copied the same birthday song that KJ posted for her son’s first birthday a month before Levi’s birthday. In another reel, KJ literally says “Stormi, you look like Mommy baby!”
My point being, Taylor is lacking originality and thinks she is a Kardashian.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CoK1GzepScg/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

https://youtube.com/shorts/YTNCrMaaJWE?feature=share(learn2embed)

No. 297435

>>297428
And the idea it's a coincidence isn't possible when she's said this about her makeup as well?

No. 297519

>>297435
It's pretty obviously not a coincidence if you watch both of the first birthday videos. Song the same, occasion the same, types of footage mostly the same. Good catch, anon who noticed that, learn to embed vids and tell us if she's blatantly copying more Jenner shit.

No. 297531

>>297422
Oh my god it’s a titan. Levi help us!!

No. 297537

>>297531
OT but I'll give you that. Lmao I had the same thought when I saw her creepy smile, ngl.

No. 297589

She said they're flying somewhere far in her stories. I guess it's Canada. Prepare for "Mixed baby meets grandparents", "Reversed culture shock" and etc. content.(this is an imageboard)

No. 297609

File: 1684712746020.jpg (145.39 KB, 864x1344, canthelpbutseeit.jpg)

>>297589
Yep, more outstanding content expected lol
picrel - her packing IG story

No. 297666

>>297609
wtf is this comparison picture??

No. 297693

>>297666
It's a shitpost, anon.

No. 297725

>>297693
shitpost = fanart and not allowed on lolcow, please stick to actual milk and not edits

No. 297735

the culture shock is going to be her estranged small town canadian family not acting as their resident nanny, cook, and assistant 24/7 and having to step up and actually parent a (jet lagged) one year old for the first time ever

No. 297758

>>297735
Who said the nanny's not traveling with them? Lol
Her idol Valeria took her nannies everywhere she went.

No. 297759

>>297758 Maybe she's taking her assistant too bc holding the camera is so exhausting.(sage your shit)

No. 297767

>>297693
I know dumbass I asked where it’s from

No. 297815

>>297609
Why'd you make this retarded edit?

No. 297820

>>297815
>>297725
combining two pictures in one image for humorous purposes is hardly an edit, and that one definitely isn't fan art kek. It's no different from comparing a photo to spongebob or something.

No. 297827

>>297820
Anon made the post without saying it was edited. They tried to pass it off as if it was from insta as is. There's no point in defending it. An edit is an edit. Especially if the "milk" is the clothes, whyd anon edit some shit to hide it?

No. 297838

>>297827
Read the filename and stop shitting up the thread over a joke you don't understand. No clothes were covered up and nothing was "passed off" as being directly from her IG. Your idiocy is showing. The post was saged, not considered milk, and the clothes weren't the point either.

No. 297890

>>296870
that’s probably hkd. around $700 usd. still extremely pricey but not out of the realm of possibility

No. 297894

File: 1684939412176.png (206.9 KB, 864x1720, Screenshot_20230524-163739.png)

>>297890
Lies. 32,800 HKD was the price in 2020 (around 4200 USD at current market rates - probably much higher back then). It's been significantly renovated (= made more luxurious) since 2020. If you don't know, why post wrong information?

No. 297897

>>297894

NTA, but the thing is they didn’t stay in the presidential suite. They stayed at La Premier Harbour View Suite which is approximately 10k HKD (1270 USD) per night on weekend.
It’s still ridiculous, especially most of her followers don’t have such money (and are outside of HK), but I don’t know where did that presidential suite came up.

No. 297905

>>297897
I don't think its about whether followers can afford it or not. The whole travel market is watched by people who just want to live vicariously through people like Taylor. Most aren't that obsessed with the price so they can afford it, they just want to see what the price offers. That's why vloggers like her and the jvloggers tend to do well enough on their various media platforms.

>>297894
Nta, but no one is lying here.

No. 297911

>>297897
OK, I see she never said what room it was, so I thought anon was citing the actual room they stayed in. Thanks. Still insane price, yeah.
>>297905
stating that a price is probably HKD when it definitely isn't is either deliberate misinformation (lie) or criminal laziness.

No. 298016

>>297911
nta but god forbid someone thought a hotel in hong kong would list a price in hong kong dollars. lock them up(derailing)

No. 298117

Now that they’re in Toronto I wonder if they’re gonna stay at a family members place or the apartment they have there. Or do they sublet it?

No. 298136

File: 1685113730844.png (185.1 KB, 864x1531, Screenshot_20230525-145908.png)

>>298117
they are staying in their own apartment they bought in Toronto. I never understood why an anon was so insistent that other people were renting it. They had all the stuff they bought there and they never talked about moving or storing any of it; there's no way they rented it to anyone imho and it was weird how these anons were just sooooo sure that happened.

picrel is 2023

No. 298137

File: 1685113939252.png (71.41 KB, 472x416, Screenshot_20230526-135054.png)

>>298136
compare to the Christmas they spent "moving to Canada"
Not a lot to go on bc they haven't posted more pics but it's definitely the same place.

No. 298225

>>298117
Usually just Airbnb and outsource the admin work that needs to be done locally.

No. 298226

>>298225
you have proof of that or just making shit up?

No. 298438

>>298136
jesus, he gets so much tv and he's not even 2 yet

No. 298483

File: 1685377447280.jpeg (126.33 KB, 1179x1304, CFEAB914-4662-4A6E-A80D-F600F7…)

okay Taylor. she’s really doubling down in the comment section of her latest reel that she did a ton of research on plane activities (she crowdsourced things to buy from her IG followers and made a list with a bunch of amazon afflinks for herself to make money off of lol)

guarantee this kid spent 50% of its time asleep on either mom or dad’s lap while the other adult slept in their fully reclined first class bed and the other 50% watching tv on the ipad, which is all he does at home anyway. but no, it didn’t make a difference to Levi at alllll. fly coach next time for 15 hours with stickers and fidget toys and get back to us Tay!

No. 298516

>>298483
I can't tell if Taylor is just overly sensitive about how much her husband's wealth makes her life easier, utterly clueless about how much Tom has to spend for her experiences and goods, or trying to downplay her wealth to seem relatable even though her fans already know she's rich and likely tune in to see how she spends it. Probably a combination of the three.

No. 298518

File: 1685385160825.jpg (1.71 MB, 5000x5000, 1685384913604.jpg)

>>298483
Lmao, most of the comments are clowning her for leaving out the fact that flying business class was a big contributor to the comfort and she chose to leave it out or even more probably takes it for granted kek
The last screen is such an asslick, I'm assuming it's a bot or our resident wk lmao

No. 298527

>>298483
She is so oblivious as to what the average mom can do and afford. I’m tired of her trying to be relatable. Business class absolutely made a difference. more space always helps,
Imagine trying to get different toys out from your bag, or formula, or snacks, and you have maybe 5 inches of space to do so. Not able to stretch your legs for 15 hours of a flight, etc. if it didn’t make a difference to Levi at all, then why even get business class?

No. 298531

>>298527
A weak attempt to frame the whole thing as "Things I did for Levi's sake and comfort", but forgetting to mention that a one year old baby won't even remember shit about the said discomfort. The one who will suffer throughout the flight, however, is her and the other passengers if the baby throws fits and cries all the time. She went overboard with the "It made no difference to Levi" when NOTHING made difference for him, she just made it obvious by playing dumb.

No. 298532

I'm surprised she got new toys for him for the flight instead of getting the usual "eco-fruendly, second hand" sponsorship kek

No. 298553

>>298518
>It's not her fault that her husband happens to be rich
I'm dying

No. 298575

>>298527
Yes her lifestyle clearly shows she isn't marketing to the lower class women with children here. Just seems like a lot of pick-mes being upset they aren't catered too when there are other people than Taylor they could watch. They are watching her specifically because they can't afford her lifestyle, but then want to complain that they can't afford her lifestyle lol

No. 298595

>>298532
yeah all that "secondhand" shit is sponsorships (retykle and another one). Her bff jessjann has the same sponsorships with those companies. It's definitely not any real attempt to cut down on consoom

No. 298596

>>298575
I fail to see how any of those comments are "pick-me" comments. Most were also polite. Do you know what a pick-me is?

No. 298597

>>298596
Wk-chan ha nothing else to nitpick in the comments, so she resorted to name-calling. Just ignore.

No. 298603

>>298595
Second this. A person who really cares about the environment and aims to reduce waste doesn't go on second hand clothing hauls every other week to shop for new trends.
It's double as disgusting when people like this get payed to promote second hand shopping.

No. 298606

>>298603
the level of cringe when fast fashion + designer shit Tay was chosen to be a host for the fashion competition about reusing/recycling/conservation (ReDress).

No. 298607

>>298606
Shows you how little the producers actually care about the very cause they're promoting.

No. 298608

>>298483
>I don't think that made a difference to levi at all
Ok let's see you do all the same things on ryanair (infamous cheap airline where your legs are rammed into the seat in front of you)
She's generally oblivious and carefree but I bet you could get her acting like a Karen in no time if she did everything at the cheap rates and services everyone else uses

No. 298611

>>298608
two things about Taylor is she can't be kept waiting ever (she has like no patience and wants everything immediately) and she wants everyone to accommodate last+minute demands. So yeah, she'd break if she had to do things like even normal people do them. RyanAir isn't a great comparison though, because iirc they don't do long flights like hers. But even a normal economy seat is almost suffocating these days (and I say this as someone who doesn't need extra space at all). I think everything has shrunk over time bc I don't remember it being this bad ten years ago.

No. 298684

>>298575
She literally does cater/market to more middle/lower class moms. She does thrifting videos, cooking on a budget videos, toy exchanges, etc. are you new here?

No. 298685

So what do her parents do for a living? They rich rich. Why doesn’t she ever mention it?

No. 298686

>>298685
Why would she mention them? She kept her sugar daddy - ehm, sorry, I meant lovely boyfriend-now-husband - secret for ages and you want her to reveal he cash cows before meeting Tom? No way.
In case you don't know, she's self-made and got all her money from modeling. /s("/s")

No. 298687

Taylor could only dream about selling her uwu relatable life with people of Tom's wealth or more. I doubt they'd be impressed like her teenage fans who think they can live abroad, take two photos a day, loiter around all day and afford to live in luxury lol

No. 298688

>>298685
She said her grandpa owned a restaurant and that's about all she ever mentioned about her family's financial background. No idea if owning a restaurant in Canada is a big deal or not, though.

No. 298690

>>298688
Doesn't her dad own a dealership?

No. 298720

>>298685
I really don't believe the claims that her family is super wealthy. Why would she have become a golddigger if she already had tons of money of her own? She could've been married to a young, model-tier Japanese hottie by now instead. There's no way she just has a thing for old, fat, ugly men and it had nothing to do with his money.

No. 298725

>>298720
Maybe it's a shock to anons, but it's possible she didn't marry for money

No. 298734

File: 1685519238816.png (455.01 KB, 864x1412, Screenshot_20230529-134248.png)

>>298690
Yeah but owning a dealership doesn't usually mean you drive a Porsche around, idk.
>>298725
kek, yeah would be an absolute shock to me, anon. This ugly, older man with piss-poor English wouldn't have gotten a hello from princess ditz Taylor if he hadn't been loaded and willing to push her career forward. It's hard to find aspects of their relationship that aren't about spending money or enabling Taylor's self-absorption.

No. 298735

>>298688
where did she say that? curious, I don't remember that

No. 298738

>>298690
Yes she mentioned in an old vlog and even visited the store. Her mom was a dental nurse but apparently not anymore? Maybe the grannies funded the families a little bit. She never struck me as rich but maybe upper middle class is a suburban aka real estate is cheaper so house nice and big.

No. 298739

>>298720
Well, may be not filthy rich, but definitely not middle class or lower. Upper middle class at the least.
Plus, her parents can't support her all her life, so she found another source of income kek
>>298725
It's also possible that she speaks five languages and has a job lol Tom is an interesting person with the same interests as her and just happens to also be rich, ugly and old.

No. 298742

her dad owns a dealership/the family is in the used luxury car business and she grew up in podunk grimsby, ontario, before the GTA expanded and niagara real estate went through the roof like 20 years later. she probably grew up feeling “rich” in a big new-build suburban house but it’s not wealth that would go far outside of their small town. she used to say she was from Toronto in her japan/youtuber days for a reason lol. she’s always embellishing the details and lying, because Taylor

No. 298747

>>298742
This is an imageboard, provide proof for any of this.

No. 298749

>>298747
NTA but that was public information documented here across the old Taylor threads.

Taylor kept deleting her videos and content as time went on to rewrite her history and it seems to have worked on you. At least read the old threads before asking to be spoonfed.

No. 298757

>>298747
You want a photo of her house or smt?

No. 298781

>>298749
How is that asking to be spoonfed when anon's are making claims, that they aren't even sure of, and not posting caps? If they are in the old threads then this discussion wouldn't be happening where anons are going back and forth about the details. Either post caps or don't discuss family stuff that can't be backed up.

No. 298783

>>298720
i feel like she has to make more money than Tom though right? i thought he was just a photographer, while she has over a million subs on youtube, plus modeling gigs. i think the fact that her bar for men is so low is due to she has crippling low self esteem and needs to feel in control.

No. 298784

>>291816
>>298783
Anon, you're an idiot if you think she makes more than Tom lmao he isn't a photographer, he owns a media company.

No. 298788

>>298781
No one is going back and forth about the basic details. Fuck off newfag and stop asking to be spoonfed.

No. 298791

>>298783
he owns companies that exploit women in low-paying or non-paying positions to sell beauty products (he bragged about not having to pay educated women much to post on beautyexchange). And then he owns a men's magazine that proudly posted underage girls' pictures for men to wank to. It has a special "Private room" for which you have to prove your salary.

Stop asking to be spoonfed basic facts, Tom was never a photographer, he can probably barely work a camera.

No. 298794

>>298781
They aren't claims, they're facts that Taylor herself has overshared many times either in videos or elsewhere. Go read the old threads and stop derailing.

No. 298806

>Tom is just a photographer
Lmao, did anon not get updated on Taylor since her living doll days? Back when the elusive Elbow-san was supposedly her manager/videographer/friend.

No. 298857

>>298806
I feel like they can't even be watching her videos if they think taylor is the breadwinner, their lifestyle isn't even slightly sustainable on an influencer salary. It's even very doubtful a media company (which has zero reach outside of China) could make their income, it has been heavily suspected due to the now deleted video where Taylor defends Tom's perverted posts on Menclub, and the "members only" salary vetted section, that there is a sex work business under the cover which is likely where he makes most of his money.

No. 298866

>>298857
Links to the videos are in previous threads, they can be watched on archive.org and I think one is still on YT. Menclub did offer porn to their public readers via OnlyFans in 2019-2020, who knows what is behind the scenes.

But I'm not sure about the sex work suspicions, it's never been proven or denied definitively. There's enough disgusting shit about MenClub and how Tom pushed Taylor's faltering career that idk if it is worth discussing what we don't know. But you are right that there are a lot of suspicious things.

No. 298867

>>298725
He barely speaks English and she barely speaks Chinese. They are barely able to have the most basic conversations and you think she married him for personality? Do you also think he married her for any reason besides looks? Kek

No. 298868

>>298867
They seem to converse fine.

No. 298881

>>298784
how well known is he in china? he can't be that popular, his website is hardly ever even updated. he always seems to be having "days off" just sitting at home.

>>298857
what lifestyle? they hardly ever travel and don't even really have a lot of "nice stuff." they eloped and live in a condo.

No. 298887

>>298881
You must be trolling lmao

No. 298888

>>298881
No one is going to spoonfeed you. You are new or ignorant or baiting. Go read old threads, because everything you've said is laughably wrong.

No. 299676

File: 1686158373989.jpg (2.01 MB, 5000x5000, 1686153883857.jpg)

I bet she bought all of their matching outfits second hand and is regularly recycling outfits. Kidding, Lmao. Why would she keep shopping while on vacation? I don't understand. Does she not have enough clothes at home? And don't mention the "vintage". For influencers it's just another shop to bulk buy at.

No. 299681

>>299676
It's not that deep, anon. It's just clothes.

No. 299790

>>299676
it's the only thing she's good at, kek. to consoom is life

No. 299803

>>299676
I don't think I've ever seen her dress Levi in the same clothes twice. His wardrobe must be bigger than hers lol

No. 299819

>>299803
Well, babies grow fast. I just hope she keeps the clothes for the next baby and reuses instead of buying new stuff.

No. 299952

>>299676
>Why would she keep shopping while on vacation? I don't understand. Does she not have enough clothes at home?
Have you never met a wealthy person before? They don't have any concept of "enough" because they don't need to.

No. 300732

File: 1686806145073.jpg (337.27 KB, 1080x1920, IMG_20230615_091116.jpg)

I think I've found a common interest between them - being a weeb.
Interesting how nowadays she only mentions Japan when she has to pretend she had a career there or to lie that she studied and knew Japanese kek

No. 300993

File: 1687139634973.jpeg (260.94 KB, 1178x2110, 171FD26D-28DB-4710-8A1C-D10D04…)

more like SAD.

No. 301000

>>300993
They aren't in burgerland for a BBQ and it's not his birthday. It's just a low-key day.

No. 301011

>>300993
I honestly wondered if someone had died

No. 301012

I literally had a nightmare about being introduced to this baby. His head just kept getting bigger and bigger. Figured you guys would get a kick out of this. Poor thing.(no1currs, not your personal blog)

No. 301033

>>300993
Did they hire the same party organiser that arranged Levi's (early) birthday party? Kek jk but this does look depressive.

No. 301043

File: 1687210489793.png (538.51 KB, 828x1792, 73F37150-0A7B-4647-8BDB-15D6DE…)

>THE ONE PERSON THAT CAN ALWAYS MAKE ME CRY THE SECOND HE DOES.
What?

No. 301065

>>301043
When he cries.. anon. Your posts are shit.

No. 301070

File: 1687236463564.png (438.63 KB, 863x1490, Screenshot_20230620-064207~2.p…)

Pretending your brother is some kind of irresistible hunk wasn't cute or funny in 2016, def isn't now.

>>301065
Taylor has serious literacy deficits and that sentence is nearly unintelligible. Stop making non-contribution posts just to defend your cow from tiny criticisms

No. 301072

>>301043
gotta love the contrast of the token metal straw with a bunch of evian bottles. Toronto's tap water is so bad it's not even worth filtering?

No. 301078

>>301065
>posts
It was one post? And sorry kek I guess I didn’t get it
>>301070
He’s not single but why link his private instagram?

No. 301084

>>301072
Omg, good catch lmao Well, she's an eco-conscious qween.

No. 301134

File: 1687303497848.jpg (246.25 KB, 1080x1885, IMG_20230621_032350.jpg)

Oh, Taylor, I would've never guessed that your mom is Levi's grandma - ah, sorry, grandma to Levi (to sound more smart). Lmao.
How the fuck does she survive with her room temperature IQ?

No. 301146

>>301070
This shit was so weird. I’m betting that no one even asked or just like 1 or 2 people. I’d feel gross saying that about my own brother

No. 301149

>>301134
Why did she have to clarify that? All her captions have been so weird on this trip.

No. 301181

>>301134
Is the other kid not her grandkid? Could probably be why. None of these seem weird.

No. 301184

>>301181
Lmao, do you and Taylor share the same half-dead braincell or something? No matter who the other kid is, Taylor's mom is Levi's grandma. No need to clarify.

No. 301188

>>301181
wait wait, is >>301070 not weird to you? Given how she was trying to make her brother into a thirst trap (gag) years ago. He was in his underwear on her Christmas vlogs and even did a Nazi salute as a 'joke' which she kept in the vlog.

No. 301190

>>301188
I'm talking about the captions and currently posted. No one asked about old milk.

No. 301229

>>301184
Lmao it’s gotta be a friend or family member of Taylor’s constantly in this thread. They reply to everything

No. 301238

>>301229
If a wk appears by the time of their layover, I'll crack kek

No. 301239

>>301146
I've noticed that it's actually a common thing among insta-bimbos. Another influencer I used to follow also posted about her uglyass brother as if he was a heartthrob, when in reality he looked like an unkempt incel living in his mother's basement.

No. 301247

>>301000
Your wk is so tiring, Taylor's minimalist "celebrations" do look clinical and sad, consistently, like how long are we supposed to wait for a non clinical looking celebration "oh this is just the low key one because ____ excuse" ok, Taylor's style is to make things look like a sterile photoshoot because she thinks it makes her look classy, that isn't gonna change. Same as her prisonesque home decor.
>>301043
I find it weird how much she dotes on male relatives while brushing over the female ones, (even here, "I cry when dad does/my brother is so hot/grandma") definite pickme but we know this already after she defended Tom's perverted site
>>301070
She's just gassing him up, mfw you're an upper middle class white man and are treated like a special prince from birth to grave kek

No. 301277

>>301239
It's a way to force interaction and which benefits the people who are doing the posting.

No. 301719

File: 1687758739069.png (443.19 KB, 864x1474, Screenshot_20230626-075005.png)

If they cancelled the internet plan in the Toronto condo, they absolutely never rented it out. The anon(s) lying about that and insisting she rented it are full of shit, no one wants a condo without wifi. Also, must have been a really shitty international mobile plan (she couldn't have uploaded from family's wifi?), but good that she decided to unplug for awhile instead.

No. 301736

>>301719
She was never consistent when in Canada. The quality of her content always dropped when she was there, so nothing new in that department. The most boring vlogs always came during her Canadian vlogmas series. Plus it's not like she's uploading weekly/daily like before, so delaying a monthly video by a month is not too noticeable.

No. 301737

How hard is it to renew an internet plan in Canada? Couldn't they renew it remotely or when they arrived? This makes no sense and is a lousy excuse. Just say you wanted to enjoy family time after a long time and let it be it.

No. 301741

>>301736
ayrt was hardly complaining about the delay. But she's not consistent at all anymore. Monthly video? If her subscribers are lucky. She always claims to be working and filming but I have no fucking idea what she does all day given the output.

No. 301765

>>301737
Easy to flip on and off when needed and can be done remotely. Literally no reason to turn it off if they're as wealthy as her wks believe.

No. 301774

>>301765
Most people just discontinue service after a few months if they know they won't be back for a long while.

No. 301793

>>301765
Second this. I don't live in Canada so I won't know, but I guess if they could turn off the service remotely then they surely can reactivate it before arriving. Not to mention spending 10 minutes out of their busy schedules to hop by the provider and paying for reactivation.

No. 301811

>>301793
Do any of you even pay internet? That's not how that works

No. 301819

>>301811
Yup. That is exactly how it works in my country. You call the provider and ask them to stop the services, pay however much you have used to that point and end of story. Then when you need Internet again, you call (or go to the office) pay to get it connected and voilà, you have WiFi again.

No. 301847

>>301719
I was wondering as well why she didnt upload stuff from her parents place of literally a restaurant? But I guess it’s her vacation so hood if she took time for her family. Its not that we missed out on amazing content.

No. 301862

>>301719
So they cancelled the internet but water, electricity still works right? Doesn't make any sense, gonna guess she just made up a dumb lie for why she didn't upload but like other anons said, she has no upload schedule anyway, it's all mostly on Instagram stories which seems like a waste imo. There is no momentum in a monthly video, weekly would be better since she does make daily content so there will always be enough for a short vlog.

No. 301875

>>301862
Internet would still charge even if you aren't in the home. Water and electricity aren't that big of a deal since no one is using water or electricity.

No. 302122

File: 1688027166996.jpg (1.36 MB, 4272x5846, 1688026925013.jpg)

The "cultural" videos are back and are as boring as ever. Minor nitpick about "sleeping" with a full face of make-up. A major ew about Tom becoming more disgusting after marrying her kek.
Someone in the comments asked if she's ever gonna learn Chinese and got attacked by Taylor's minions. One of the retards said she's asking how to say things now and then, so she must be learning it. Logic of steel kek But why get defensive? Isn't she "learning" it already? Along with Japanese and French lmao

No. 302123

>>302122
I hate her casually racist captions "after marrying an Asian" which nobody seems to pick up on. I feel like Asian Person would be a lot better.
She doesn't bother learning Mandarin because she has no interest in China and Chinese people outside of Tom, and still not enough respect for him to want to know what he's saying kek

No. 302125

File: 1688032938957.webm (3.12 MB, 720x1280, SaveInsta.App - 31355375446373…)

>>302122
Here's the reel. Never once have I seen Taylor use chopsticks to eat anything other than sushi or the occasional main dish. Certainly not chips or snack food. Not even once, in all the years I've watched her content. It's also obvious that even in this video she struggles for the milliseconds she is using them, but could be the fact that chips are very thin. idk.

She clearly got all her injectables topped up in Canada because what is this face…? It's even worse with the heavy bangs. It was puffier before she left Canada too.

No. 302132

File: 1688045078980.jpeg (139.2 KB, 828x1401, 3067EBCF-1B56-4CFB-9CC0-759BB0…)

>>302123
> after marrying an Asian
It just sounds dumb but it’s not racist to say somebody is Asian or whatever
>>302125
I thought so too she must’ve done something, maybe that’s why the radio silence?

No. 302135

File: 1688046463377.png (1.01 MB, 1179x2556, 93DF5DE9-856B-44FF-AEE3-3AB785…)

also from the stories today, you can tell the kid’s getting too big and boisterous to be carried around like an accessory and Taylor’s clearly annoyed while they walk around the shops as he tries to smack her hat off her head (in the previous story to this one, here she just huffs and looks fed up and doesn’t say a word to him as he hangs off his mother for some attention.) she has her phone on/in hand the entire time lol

No. 302146

>>302132
I noticed her face looked different, definitely a filler top up. Her hair looks different too, not sure if she got extensions or just a colour (the gradient from dark to blonde seems more pronounced) but it looks thicker here.

No. 302148

File: 1688052368241.jpg (178.32 KB, 1080x1904, IMG_20230629_151115.jpg)

Nta, but not miss conscious shopping host shopping again for a one time outfit.

No. 302150

>>302135
I'm really really curious if they took the nanny/dh to Canada with them, because I can't imagine her handling the kid on her own for that long.

No. 302152

>>302150
Why not? It didn't look like they are there and she has parents.

No. 302167

>>302125
She really needs to dissolve the fillers before adding more. She always had too much filler and the skin is stretched over the face and making lumps visible.

No. 302173

File: 1688063174649.webm (9.85 MB, 1080x1920, 342252697_2043509412666142_130…)

>>302135
story 1 (smacking cap, assistant pushing stroller)

No. 302174

File: 1688063254172.webm (7.64 MB, 1080x1920, 352214711_572207921746129_6447…)

>>302135
story 2 (assistant laughing, taylor pissed)

No. 302175

>>302174
Anon, I think you want her to look and be pissed. She's watching him waddle around her and cling to her legs, which she isn't pissed about, she just isn't big smile over.
>>302173
She doesn't seem mad here either, she's avoiding him grabbing the hat and blowing kisses at him at the same time.

No. 302183

>>302175
lmfao she doesn't blow him a kiss and no one wants her to look any specific way. No one said she looked mad in the first story either.

No. 302197

>>302183
She is blowing kisses when her head is looking down and anon said the other video she looked pissed. Nice cherry picking.

No. 302206

>>302122
lmao she really wants us to believe she looks like that when she sleeps, a full face of makeup.

remember her recent story where she was eating ketchup chips in bed? pajamas + full face of makeup, no chopsticks either kek

No. 302207

>>302132
Maybe she got fillers on her chin/lower face? Her face looks longer and slimmer, I think, I def don't think she got more fillers on her cheeks

No. 302209

>>302174
"my child clearly wants me to hold him because he's in an unfamiliar place, better take this opportunity for a photo op while i pretend to be busy!" god i hate vain models

No. 302212

File: 1688074622287.jpeg (243.43 KB, 1179x2069, 6ED12796-DD36-44B9-8854-9B5E5F…)

well I just think it’s funny that while taylor’s running around the mall with her paid assistant and neglected toddler, tom’s sitting on his ass in the food court eating a grilled cheese

No. 302230

>>302207
it's insanely lumpy below her lips, like her marionette area.

No. 302231

>>302212
pretty sure it's HK French toast, which is basically a fat/sugar bomb. beyond even what American French toast is

No. 302232

>>302212
He's having a well deserved rest after looking after the kid for five minutes, while Taylor does her share of five minutes by using it as a photo op.

No. 302233

Has anyone seen Rosie for a while? I know she was in Canada but still no sign of Rosie now she's back, unless I missed something

No. 302235

>>302233
Rosie was in one of the jetlag IG stories. But Rosie didn't go to Canada, in case by „she” you meant Rosie

No. 302238

>>302235
I must have missed it, thanks for clarifying anon!

No. 302239

>>302233
She never went to Canada

No. 302240

>>302173
is her filming assistant also a nanny? I'm kind of confused about why this boring content is even being filmed and even then why does the person filming have to push the stroller too? Wouldn't it be better filmed if she weren't doing that? idk. It's definitely the same person who films Taylor sometimes, she sounds the same. To be clear: I don't care if Taylor has another nanny, but I wonder how it makes sense to pay someone to film and then have that person do stuff that interferes with filming.(samefagging)

No. 302254

>>302240
It's boring and non milky but she just did these for vlogs. Assistant isn't the nanny.

No. 302292

>>302123
>Mandarin
lol wut people speak Cantonese in Hong Kong

No. 302347

>>302292
nta but I think most people in Hong Kong speak at least some Mandarin and they will be able to read most of the simplified characters. There aren't many resources for learning Cantonese and I don't think Tom's English is good enough to teach her himself so it makes sense that she might learn Mandarin instead.

No. 302348

File: 1688216403142.jpg (126.36 KB, 606x1280, IMG_20230701_150108_378.jpg)

>>302347
She's not learning either language, though. It would be better if she brushed up on her English so that Levi doesn't make mistakes like "mine as well."

No. 302351

>>302348
Old milk, but agreed. That baby has no chance of learning proper English from either of his parents.

No. 302357

>>302348
>>302351
Yeah, considering she struggles with basic French despite growing up in a French speaking country it's not really surprising.

No. 302379

>>302357
French isn't Canada's main language, anon, certainly not fluently except in some smaller areas like Quebec.

No. 302380

>>302379
French and English are both official languages. I know English takes priority in most of Canada but they have French lessons at school, French tv, and everything else bilingual throughout all of Canada. French is like 90% the same as English as well. Even just through osmosis alone she should know a fair bit.(this thread is not a chatroom)

No. 302392

>>302380
Nah, it's a joke among French that Canadian French is shit. Not to defend Taylor, but the vast majority of Canadians suck at French or don't know it at all. There's no justification for her grade-schooler level English, though.

No. 302506

>>302380
Lol. No to all of this except the official language statement. Less than 10% of Canadians speak French. For comparison the US has more Spanish speakers than that (over 12%) and it’s not an official language. Also, French is not 90% like English lol! English is West Germanic based and French is Latin based. And Taylor is from Ontario where more people speak Chinese based languages than French…(derailing)

No. 302509

>>302506
The fact Taylor is married to a Chinese man and has a child with him yet speaks 0 Mandarin or Cantonese makes discussion of all the other languages she doesn't speak defunct kek
Never gonna happen.

No. 302510

>>302506
>Also, French is not 90% like English lol! English is West Germanic based and French is Latin based.
English has a lot of French influence because of the Normans, as well as sharing Latin roots. Once you learn the verb conjugations, it's not hard to speak French because of all the cognates.

Canadians not knowing French is pure laziness.(stop continuing the derail)

No. 302579

File: 1688386668268.jpg (295.22 KB, 1080x1977, IMG_20230703_161224.jpg)

Is it a coincidence that out of all of her and Levi's matching outfits she chose to post this one and make sure to stress they're SECOND HAND? lmao
>>299676

No. 302581

>>302579
Her retard baby has the stance of a scoliosis victim. Does she not let him go outside, like ever? Why is it leaning to the side like that?(autistic baby nitpicking)

No. 302588

>>302579
Now I'm annoyed. If I knew she'd be posting justification posts, I would've screecapped all of their couple outfits to make it harder for her. Ugh, whatever. But it proves once again that she lurks here regularly.

>>302581
Don't throw around diagnoses as a way of insulting people. The baby is fine.

No. 302591

>>302579
probably posted it because there is a story behind it. the chances are pretty slim

>>302581
he's just standing with a leg out, calm down

No. 302607

>>302579
Ngl, pretty lucky if she did find two shirts that matches at two different stores. The cuts are different, so might be true.

No. 302632

>>302581
>judging a baby's posture
Oh my god anon you really make me suspect Kiki still roams these halls kek

No. 302634

>>302579
Taylor suddenly pretending to trawl secondhand stores (despite frequently showing us her drawers and closets full of new, brand clothing) is an unexpected twist

No. 302637

>>302581
jeez mod, no need to call the baby autistic

No. 302639

>>302634
Nah, she's been playing the secondhand spiel ever since she's been doing that fashion contest. How the fuck they ended up choosing her will always be a mystery for me.

No. 302644

>>302639
don't know what contest you mean but a lot of contests that allow anyone to enter are publicity stunts with winners chosen before the contest even opens so maybe that one was as well

No. 302656

File: 1688455691142.jpeg (457.96 KB, 771x1330, 67A7180E-BB4C-4D16-89D7-6D549C…)

“leant” It’s loaned or lent, Taylor(nitpicking)

No. 302657

I wish I had Taylor's lifestyle but with a good looking guy who's not fat.

No. 302663

>>302656
Show this post to the morons who believe she's learning Mandarin/cantonese/Japanese. She makes dumb ass mistakes in her own language. I mean, use spelling and grammar checking apps to avoid embarrassing mistakes if you can't trust your knowledge.

No. 302664

>>302656
So she could ask her friends and family to stock her fridge and prepare baby things to borrow, but couldn't think about switching on the WiFi service before arriving? I call this bullshit. She shouldn't have used that justification. Stupid move.

No. 302665

File: 1688463143775.jpg (273.98 KB, 1080x1896, IMG_20230704_133047.jpg)

I'm mildly annoyed at this as someone who's studied and lived abroad since I was 17. The hardest part for me was learning to solve problems like bills, housing, juggling work and study eyc. And her biggest problem is? Not being there for holidays and missing milestones. And even those are easy to solve problems for her - she just gets the tickets (without much of a financial burden) and goes.(blogposting)

No. 302678

>>302664
They forgot they canceled? Crazy, I know. When you don't use electricity or water, you won't notice the bills. Wifi stays on and is a constant same charge even if its not in use. Of course they canceled or stopped service. That's easily forgettable due to wifi just existing in general.

No. 302679

>>302678
Except they're not poor or in need of saving money that they'd care. A few years of wifi doesn't even come close to a fraction of their plane tickets or a day of shopping.

No. 302680

>>302656
I saw the typo too but in the next story she wrote it correctly

No. 302681

>>302679
Anon, adults normally hault services. I don't know why you think Taylor and Tom wouldn't. Your issues aren't their issues, but that doesn't mean that they are dumb enough to keep paying high bills for something they aren't even using and get so mad they didn't remember a few years later. This isn't a money thing. It's just usually what people do. Sorry you're so poor, but stop projecting.

No. 302686

>>302665
>I have more than one home

I hate rich people

No. 302689

File: 1688490875593.jpg (276.26 KB, 1080x1664, Screenshot_20230704_101502_Ins…)

>>302686
I just double-checked and its about living abroad, not even about money specifically.

No. 302691

File: 1688491321937.jpg (598.17 KB, 1079x1777, Screenshot_20230704_102043_Ins…)

>>>/w/280698
So she isn't looking to move back to CAN any time soon it seems.

No. 302693

>>302691
It's not up to her to decide kek obviously Tom is the one making money decisions. They were planning to move after getting married (hence the rushed "elopement" to buy property) and having kids there, but COVID got in the way.

No. 302694

>>302679
It's not even a matter of money. Cancelling the service makes sense. Forgetting to activate it and using it as a justification for not "working" (since SM posts are Taylor's job) is.

No. 302695

>>302694
She was still posting though.

No. 302760

>>302695
kek, she wasn't posting anything significant from Canada, a handful of IG stories, not that I care, but why pretend she was posting or "working"? It's not slander or wrong to say she took a 4-5w vacation from being an influencer, that's totally normal vacation in most parts of the world.
>>302678
Tinfoil and false. This is not how electricity or water works: you don't pay nothing if you use nothing. I won't derail further but a condo is probably under USMP (use google) & so they can't shut electric off anyway - this is actually a defense of them not shutting it off, btw. Both sides need to stop derailing.

No. 302766

>>302691
Jesus, why would you paint over the kid? Put it under spoiler or something if you wanna be woke. This is ridiculous.(because they read the rules about posting minors)

No. 302767

>>302766
nta but why do you care, there's nothing woke about not wanting to post a toddler on an imageboard just because his mom happens to be a cow

No. 302789

>>302767
Makes me think anons really have been purposely posting the kid if someone is this mad he's blurred out. We have pedos who post cp on lolcow, nothing interesting ever happens with her kid anyway, just tinfoil about Taylor not taking care of him, so focus on Taylor. Otherwise anons post stupid takes like >>302579

No. 302802

Can we stop the autistic discussions about blurring/not blurring the kid and the WiFi debate? There's enough derail in the thread already.(derailing, report and move on)

No. 303101

File: 1689053546940.jpg (Spoiler Image, 4.63 MB, 5000x5000, 1689053541516.jpg)

I think filming fringe content is one of her go-tos when there's nothing to post (or do). Warning, jumpscare. That lipstick is horrendous.

No. 303106

>>303101
Tbh, I think that's a cute orange-red and matches with her orange/pink undertone.

No. 303108

File: 1689074629836.png (1.01 MB, 864x1468, Screenshot_20230711-131517~2.p…)

>>303101
>>303106
I don't think this is the right color for her and with the way she does her lips, it looks clownish instead of chic. Pretty sure she was given it for free, since she's promoting it. She has gotten PR boxes and done promotions for Charlotte Tilbury in the past.(nitpicking )

No. 303116

>>303106
I disagree. It's clearly meant for someone with a darker skin. It looks cartoonist on her, especially with her idiotic doll stare. Is she trying to go back to her Taylor 1.0 face? The fuck is that pout and wide open eyes?

No. 303131

File: 1689103290833.jpg (103.6 KB, 1800x900, new-m3gan-trailer.jpg)

>>303116
I think the years of fillers and botox are finally catching up with her and giving her a visibly altered look, her joker smile indents due to a lip lift a long time ago are more visible >>303101 and the rest of her face is looking more plastic, maybe she just overdid the procedures so she doesn't have to go back in again for a while, but she's looking like that robot doll that was (possibly) based on her rn(nitpick)

No. 303152

>>303101
in the same vein, I think she cuts her bangs and/or colours her hair whenever she’s getting her fillers etc. done to distract from her beat frozen face(nitpick)

No. 303155

>>303101
Oml she looks like a creepy puppet

No. 303164

File: 1689155449823.webm (1.07 MB, 720x1280, EC467C66E7E99F6A173D6E939E2D35…)

Is she trolling with this content? I find it hard to believe that anyone steps out of shoes at the doorway and leaves them in the way for everyone else coming in. Maybe a Canadian can weigh in on that. Is there a reason she is pretending she loves using chopsticks and is so adept at using them? I think it's clear especially in this choppy video that she doesn't use them often or well. I'm just puzzled bc there's no shame in eating with a fork and knife.

None of this is nitpicking her, it is a response to the actual content, which is about "things she does differently since marrying an Asian" (part 2), and posting a webm of the IG reel. I can't believe I have to preemptively defend posting about a cow but admin have twice stated Taylor's thread can be used for … discussing Taylor. >>>/meta/57740
>>>/meta/58490(take it to /meta/)

No. 303186

>>303164
And the differences are wearing slippers, drinking hot drinks, eating with chopsticks (groundbreaking) and using a bidet - a French invention. She's not even trying with these

No. 303194

>>303101
Istg whatever she’s doing is making her look much older than she is. Same thing that is happened with Kylie. The divets around her mouth…karma for being a pedo apologist ig.

No. 303202

>>303186
I don't understand the point of slippers either. It would make more sense if she was talking about guests taking off shoes - most people in America don't take off their shoes when visiting others, unlike many Asian countries. But taking off shoes and wearing slippers at home is pretty much universal.
>using a bidet - a French invention
OK, that never occurred to me! Good point.

No. 303203

>>303194
The irony of trying to stay young and getting the opposite result kek I wonder if one day she'll finally admit to the constant procedures she gets.(nitpicking)

No. 303210

>>303194
She had a kid. Pretty much everyone starts aging after that due to lack of sleep and stress

No. 303213

>>303210
Lack of sleep from looking after the kid for two hours a day? Don't make me laugh. Plus, no one's critisizing her for "aging", only for overpumping her face with botox and fillers.(nitpicking)

No. 303218

>>303213
NTA, but that is unfortunately how most people's genetics work. Also, give me proof she looks after her kid for like an hour or two hours a day, anon. Having a nanny doesn't mean you ignore your kid and they take care of it 24/7. You've clearly never had a nanny.

No. 303300

>>303210
Her kid sleeps through the night, and he never really fusses so I don’t get how she’d be stressed at all

No. 303301

>>303300
Upthread she mentioned he wasn't sleeping well while traveling. Try reading the thread. Also, we only see what she curates to post.

No. 303321

>>303301
While traveling, like any toddler going through a 12 hour time change. She’s a pretty open person, so if she was stressed I’m sure she’d talk about it but she doesn’t. She’s able to even film reels while Levi is in the room, her life hasn’t slowed down at all

No. 303334

>>303321
Every time she's brought up being stressed, anons ignore it and say she has a nanny, so idk what you expect.

No. 303346

>>303321
Can't agree. She doesn't post when she's really stressed, because she's busy dealing with the things at hand. Plus, babies that age are clingy and it's either not filming at all because he's always in the way, or filming with the baby. It proves nothing.
Otoh, saying that her botched look is just a natural result of tiredness and stress is also reaching.

No. 303347

>>303346
That's what I thought too. Why would she post just to complain all the time when she could be relaxing or dealing with the baby in general instead? She's not going to shut herself down and lock herself away when she's stressed and complain on social media when brands and people follow her.

No. 303445

>>303346
so you're just assuming then

No. 303693

File: 1689859366294.jpeg (237.06 KB, 1179x1699, 52249B4D-7A34-4837-B6BF-29ECD3…)

taylor’s out here like the dollar store knockoff of kimono mom. maybe levi throws his food so often because of all the stringy fried hair in it.

No. 303697

>>303693
Lmao, good point. But to be fair she has been cooking with the dog before Levi was born. So it's not that new. I'm not sure how common it is to cook with pets and kids, though, so I can't judge. (watch all of us get banned again).

No. 303698

File: 1689862835494.jpg (492.14 KB, 1080x1915, IMG_20230720_180422.jpg)

Is it me or she looks pregnant in the latest stories?

No. 303704

>>303697
Parents do it all the time. It's a non-issue.

No. 303705

>>303698
Nah, I doubt it. She looked as usual in previous stories. May be she's just bloated or something.

No. 303711

>>303698
Where do you even see that? She looks normal.

No. 303720

File: 1689875651890.jpeg (158.99 KB, 828x1412, B8D6B85E-2950-4B19-8796-5811CA…)

>>303698
I thought the same thing. Could just be the shirt she’s wearing though

No. 303728

>>303693
She didn't say anything about throwing food, was that in another side at all? All it says is that Levi eats the prep work while she's trying to do the prep work.

No. 303735

>>303728
She says he throws food on the floor in every other baby food story. The latest being about him trying dried tomatos or smt instead of throwing it on the floor. I don't have a screencap, sorry.

No. 303737

>>303735
I also saw it but don't have a screenshot. She said he would throw them on the floor if she gave it to him for a meal but if she is cooking, he will try things.

Anyway, none of this is really worth discussing. I don't think she is pregnant either, her face just looks really puffy. But I also don't think it's great to speculate about whether a woman is pregnant, even a cow.

No. 303756

File: 1689916904598.jpg (3.45 MB, 5000x5000, 1689916953498.jpg)

Is she losing her sense of humor or what? Most of her reels content recently is so stale, unfunny and uninteresting…

No. 303783

File: 1689952061420.jpg (3.76 MB, 5155x4849, 1689952016610.jpg)

Speaking of reels, she gave a Ted talk in her stories about this stupid reel going viral. I'm not sure why. Because it's not even her own idea, she just recreated the exact same video as the original poster's, even the caption is the same, heck, even the emojis in the description. She didn't even mention the creator she copied. There's literally only two videos with the audio, so she can't pretend she came across it by accident kek

No. 303788

>>303783
Finally some semblance of milk after months, but the only thing is that you don't even need to credit the creator when the audio links right back to the OP. The author isn't upset, so not the milk is trying to be passed off as once I looked in to it. The algorithm really doesn't usually pick up on low use audios, but Taylor has an existing fanbase which is the reason it got popular. Oh well, could've been good milk, but not really milky. She's just explaining how the algorithm sometimes completely ignores and doesn't push the content, but that doesn't matter when you have a fanbase to begin with.



For anyone not watching, the audio is only "thank you for your service" and its her removing a bay leaf. Emi had this audio already circulating on tiktok in 2022 with multiple users that aren't Taylor using it.

No. 303792

File: 1689959154586.png (931.59 KB, 864x1431, Screenshot_20230721-185922.png)

>>303787
>>303788
it's saged so no one is claiming it's milk, weirdo. Thanks for your monologue about it.

She posted an another ad for Charlotte Tilbury (picrel). That's why she's using these lip blurs. I was interested in the product based on the name but after looking a bit they just seem like normal matte liquid lipsticks to me. don't know why she didn't do a more ombre look with them or even show a real close-up of the product on her lips but I guess if the company approves your ad, you get your bag so it doesn't matter.

No. 303797

>>303783
Lmao did the five seconds of fame, sorry, being viral get into her head? I can hear her breathless, manic voice in the text lol Girl, chill, no need to give a motivational speech over a two second reel. It's just a silly video, not some lifetime goal achieved.
P.S. Even the tongs are the same colour. She can't be serious lol yet another instance of Taylor copycating others in desperate attempts to go viral.

No. 303798

>Emi had this audio already circulating on tiktok in 2022 with multiple users that aren't Taylor using it.

the only useful contribution in the wall of text. this makes it even funnier. If it was circulating somewhat widely on tiktok, I'm surprised Taylor didn't copy it sooner.

No. 303800

>>303783
Oh my god, here I was thinking “finally something original from her instead of just copying people” but no lmfao

No. 303806

>>303792
No one cares about her lipstick PR stuff, all she does is pr

No. 303829

File: 1690016747520.jpg (328.4 KB, 1080x1860, 20230722125833.jpg)

Here's the answer to the pregnancy speculations. She clearly isn't. Did she give up on getting pregnant for the time's being, though? Because why start retinol, if you're planning a pregnancy in the near future? Whatever.

No. 303942

>>303829
afraid to age, I guess. Strange how she didn't use retinol from the beginning of larping as a teen, since it is the only clinically proven topical that treats surface wrinkles and acne.

No. 303965

>>303942
Because she didn't believe in modern science and medicine back then. She opted out of medical treatment for her skin condition after a couple of days because it "didn't work". Until recently she swore by Chinese medicine and other quackery, so it's interesting that she's started to use effective skincare.
OR there's a major skincare collab/ad coming up and she's trying to set the ground for it.

No. 303984

>>303965
She spent years trying to get pregnant, she's not that old. Why the hell would she start at like 20 when she had other things to do? The beauty industry is a scam.

No. 304058

>>303984
your comment makes no sense, no idea what you're on about.

No. 304066

File: 1690222114608.jpg (6.23 MB, 5000x5000, 1690222054868.jpg)

I understand when people post their baby's drawings and call it art, but doing it with your own doodles at 11 is a bit… lol Especially since she tries to push as it a proof of her creativity.

No. 304071

File: 1690224960577.webm (5.31 MB, 720x1280, F8423C4DA1749A1E2D0C07C750C1DD…)

>>304066
coloring inside the lines = art and the creative process, lmao. ok.

It's all for an ad though - the art x family glurge. HSBC must really be having trouble finding even remotely relevant shills. Wonder if she even used HSBC when she moved or if that will be retconned. I find this language of "connecting" with an audience because you're getting paid pretty cringe.

No. 304073

File: 1690225253659.webm (1.7 MB, 720x1280, C649248266682DE6CADD8EB93D9072…)

>>304066
she also messed up the audio because her lips don't move for the second "good job" and for some reason it sounds like a voiceover she added later, beyond weird.

No. 304085

>>304073
I didn't even notice the creepy voice, omg. This is scary, not shooting as she thinks.

No. 304086

>>304071
Cmiiw, but didn't she already do an ad for them with this same theme? Am I having a deja vu?

No. 304092

>>304058
Try reading harder.(infighting)

No. 304115

File: 1690276860161.jpg (439.08 KB, 1080x1900, IMG_20230725_132022.jpg)

Who's gonna tell her it's bruising? Poor circulation, my ass. She got scammed.

No. 304116

I don't know how to post videos, but her bank ad is just a word salad. I loled when she talked about "belonging" in HK. Girl, we all know you know literally no one there, except for Jess (or what was her name) and Carol.

No. 304119

>>304115
paying to get beaten up by a stranger
>>304086
she's definitely done a sponsorship with them before, though I think it was just one post where this is several. So weird to be shilling banks to her followers, they are respectable but this is so irrelevant to her brand. Must pay her well though

No. 304120

>>304116
She says she moved there 12 years ago and "fell in love" but she was living in Japan in early-mid 2010s, not Hong Hong, and tom (elbow san) didn't start appearing until later in the Japan vlogs, not sure of the exact date but 8 years ago maybe? Didn't she actually only live in HK full time since about 2017 or later? The timeline seems off even as a casual viewer, someone who knows better can correct me but she implies 12 years of living in Hing Kong in the ad which is definitely incorrect.

No. 304132

>>304120
True. She spent at least four years in Japan (don't quote me on this, I don't remember the exact timeline). And I love the implication of her renting her own place "thanks to the easy-to-get bank account", when she herself said she lived in a shared a flat with the other girls, provided by the agency.
Then she pretty much leeched off of Tom nonstop.

But of course none of that is mentioned in the ad. Doesn't fit the hashtag girlboss narrative.
I'm surprised she didn't mention her business in the ad. Is it not targeted at fellow successful business women?

No. 304133

File: 1690290471680.jpg (524.26 KB, 2400x3195, 20230725_150806-COLLAGE.jpg)

>>304119
it's not that respectable. At the behest of China, HSBC froze the assets of people fleeing HK under political persecution.(derailing)

No. 304139

>>304133
Thanks for the info, I didn't know this. That explains the collab, they want some good international PR.
>>304132
I'm sure it's scripted, I know in mainland China there are blockades preventing women starting up businesses (essentially the males in the family get all the family money and help) so it's probably not a trendy topic for their ad

No. 304162

File: 1690308864584.jpg (174.05 KB, 1080x1220, IMG_20230725_220903.jpg)

>>304133
I'm not at all surprised, but Taylor cashing in that CCP money again… Does she even have a HK audience? Most of her followers are from abroad and she specifically stated that the ad is for HK-ers only.

On another note, I always enjoy reading comments under her "lie about my life" videos. Because I come across gems like this, followed by braindead fangirls rewriting history for her.

No. 304209

File: 1690364886561.jpg (808.66 KB, 2160x3840, 20230726_114832-COLLAGE.jpg)

It's wild to say these things and not be able to communicate in the local language of your "new home." I mean, not even trying to learn it really…

No. 304212

>>304209
Yeah after what anon mentioned >>304133 it's definitely scripted to take the heat off how they have treated actual HK residents, who used this bank, I understand you can't really go against whatever the government demand as a business but it's still shitty treatment. So hire some overseas influencers to post about how much HK is their home and this bank helps.

No. 304229

>>304133
these two comments have the most likes now. She is ignoring them, but tbf I'm not sure she has the mental capacity or wisdom to address them graciously

No. 304315

>>304209
Do we know for sure she still can't speak Canto? I mean Tom barely speaks English, how tf do they have any non-superficial conversations

No. 304319

>>304315
Oh, believe me, if she did, she'd make sure everyone knows. She can't even pronounce simple dish names properly, let alone string a meaningful sentence.
>how tf do they have any non-superficial conversations
They don't kek

No. 304353

>>304315
Its just tinfoil. We don't see them having full conversations a lot of the time and tbh, Taylor does most of the talking. Its just a language barrier nitpick at this point that anons won't get over.

No. 304389

>>304133
And why does this get labelled as derail? Are the mods here on crack?(sage)

No. 304422

>>304315
I dont think Taylor is able to have meaningful conversations even IN english.

No. 304454

>>304353
Not really tinfoil, just see the riveting conversation she had with Carol in one of her Youtube videos for an example of how she is likely to talk to Tom, there aren't any insightful debates we are missing off camera kek

No. 304455

>>304315
Carol didn't seem to have as much practice as Tom with English. Taylor is obviously never going to be fluent just like Carol and Tom will probably not be fluent in English.

No. 304477

>>304319
Remember her old days on YouTube where she’d add Japanese subtitles because she was totes fluent in Japanese

No. 304483

File: 1690738366564.jpeg (290.03 KB, 1179x2093, 34A1E429-4A46-488D-B597-E9A737…)

is it just me or has her language and grammar taken a nosedive lately? it’s also funny she thinks making the bed in her master bedroom (before guests come? just close your door?) is a relatable tidying content.

the help cleans the place full time, better find something to do so she can look busy on camera! then proceeds to have child-free hours to spend making a snack plate

No. 304485

File: 1690742135830.jpg (356.93 KB, 1080x1889, IMG_20230730_222201.jpg)

>>304483
In the same lane as this, lol. Mom brain? I'm pretty sure it only refers to the postpartum period, not moms of one-year-olds. She's just dumb.

No. 304486

File: 1690742360610.jpg (6.48 MB, 3742x6679, 1690742039616.jpg)

1) Talks about moving to Hongkong 12 years ago ALONE, only shows footage from her latest move with Tom.
2) It's just me being petty about her true chopstick skills.
3) The only truthful thing in the video kek - her obsession with ketchup chips.
4) Making new friends from new cultures - only has friends who are English speaking foreigners lol

No. 304491

>>304486
this ad was much more pathetic and fake than the first lol. I used to never care about her chopstick technique but more and more I see her doing it so poorly. There is nothing wrong with this, but it's crazy to pretend she eats chips and chicken with chopsticks now when it's badly spliced video and the sticks are never held in a way that would let her pick up something organically.

I don't have the energy for the rest but it was just cringey and dumb. She's probably disappointed with the view counts on this stuff. I think I noticed her deleting some comments on the previous video (or IG was messing up). Didn't see anything negative on the new, worse one - lots of spammy comments though.

No. 304494

>>304491
The new one is a little bit woe is me my friends abandoned me when I left Canada for a decade, don't think this one was fully scripted by the sponsor since that's a bit specific.
I feel like these videos somehow inadvertently revealed she is not actually happy in HK, like a weird sponsored cry for help. She's obviously very happy with her family of Tom and Levi, but imo strong vibes that she doesn't actually want to stay in HK, anyone else getting that vibe?

No. 304499

>>304486
correction, english speaking foreigners who are ALSO just influencers using eachothers friendships for the likes/views. I think the closest exception to that was Sharla, and they haven’t seen eachother in years. cannot imagine Taylor and Tom interacting with any of her Japan “friends” today

No. 304504

>>304486
>white people cant have other cultures

Most abroad people migrate towards others who speak their main language. This isn't some Taylor specific thing when it's the same with migrants coming to US or Can. They are still foreigners she's meeting.

No. 304512

>>304494
Ain’t in her glory days that HK licks her ass to join nonstop events. Younger and newer models/influencers take her spot and hk seems not attractive to her anymore. To me it looks like she lowkey wants to be living in her small town in canada after reaching close 40

No. 304518

>>304504
Don't twist the words. She has literally zero friends who are not Canadian or American - Sharla, Joyce, Jessica. The only person from a different culture is Tom. Her ex-assistant Natalie was payed to hang out with her, so it doesn't count, neither does Carol.
I agree that it's a common thing, but you don't see other expats lying and pretending to have friends from the country they live in for an ad. On the contrary, most struggle with finding friends among locals and it's ok. She doesn't have to lie in every second post she makes about her wonderful life in HK.

No. 304527

>>304518
No one twisted anything. Anon is just an idiot who thinks all white people she meets are burgerheads because they speak English. Ffs, It's just a terrible take.

No. 304529

I honestly don't see anything wrong in OP's post. Where did she say every English speaker is American? She just pointed out that Taylor has no friends from "other cultures" like she claims, which is true. All her friends (that she's shown on SM) are either American or Canadian.

>>304494
Yeah, I got the same feeling. It was meant to have an encouraging, uplifting tone, but ended up being the opposite.

No. 304552

File: 1690870717505.jpg (301.35 KB, 1080x1892, IMG_20230801_101513.jpg)

The rattails are officially back! I'm no hairdresser but this is a terrible result. It's sooo uneven and asymmetrical. Why won't she have her hair cut by a professional? She can afford it, so why the constant attempts to cut bangs by herself.

No. 304565

>>304552
She got lucky and managed to not ruin her bangs with the previous try and got bold. This was a usual outcome for her hair experiments.
S/N Did she rediscover the duck face? lmao She had this retarded expression throughout the video.

No. 304572

>>304552
Honestly looks kinda nice and you don't know what a rattail is in regards to hair clearly.

No. 304574

>>304552
Honestly I don't hate it. I'd have to see what it looks like not in a ponytail though. It's usually a pretty bad idea to cut your hair when tied.

No. 304589

File: 1690912302718.jpeg (148.24 KB, 828x1173, ED582CAC-9665-4AA9-BAA5-AE8FB9…)

Yeah, seems very difficult when you’re fake crying and smiling. Could she be anymore less genuine?

No. 304601

>>304589
This is giving 0 context. At least post the video. She's all blurred out. Is this just another complaint about HK sponsorships?

No. 304608

>>304601
It's not a story. It's a reel and you can go watch it on her IG. Are you the one who goes apeshit if people post vids here and also refuses to go watch the videos on her IG?

No. 304638

File: 1690979167942.jpg (4.13 MB, 5000x5000, 1690973976417.jpg)

>>304574
You were right, it doesn't look good with hair let loose.(nitpicking)

No. 304642

>>304638
What are you talking about? It looks fine tbh.

No. 304646

>>304638
She needs gradual layers to blend it in or something, but thats just my opinion.

No. 304656

>>304638
Taylor makes the kind of content that would only seem good if you did not follow or watch any other content creators (derivative) like with the way the internet is now where they actively force you to watch random popular stuff - Tiktok for you, Twitter For You, recommended Reels, everyone can recognise when she reuses a meme like "the back is none of my business" which is quite an old meme at this point, and also not applicable to Taylor since she looks immaculate most of the time. She isn't some normie getting ready in the mirror, she is an influencer who constantly films and photographs her life, her hair is never out of place and why would it be.

No. 304657

>>304656
Thats all those sites do, reuse old memes because they become re-viral. You must not be watching as many people as you think you are because this has been the mentality of influencers for the past 3 years. Everyone content is virtually the same depending on who they pander to.

No. 304667

>>304657
ayrt, no I know most influencers are derivative and repetitive (lotta clickbait too) but more that her content would only be interesting if you lived under a rock and never saw any of the things she's referencing.
Imo she can make interesting vlogs and such, this is very low effort

No. 304675

>>304657
No that’s not “all those sites do,” you just follow unoriginal people. How someone can feel proud for going viral for an idea that wasn’t even theirs baffles me. Taylor has no original thoughts in her head.

No. 304681

>>304675
That's how the internet works. Crazy, right?

No. 304682

>>304675
Agreed, Taylor has been copying other influencers for so long (dakota being the first of course) and idk where the satisfaction is in just recreating someone else's ideas.

No. 304691

>>304682
I'm sure she has no problem copying others, as long as she gets clicks and validation from others. Which was proved by her recent celebration about the bay leaf copy-paste going viral.

No. 304699

Stop with the dumb nitpicking already

No. 304772

>>304699
Let Kiki express herself("hi cow")

No. 304822

>>304772
They crucified Jesus for speaking the truth too

No. 304830

File: 1691319756549.jpg (4.27 MB, 5000x5000, 1691319623278.jpg)

She chooses such weird topics and photos to show Levi's similarity to herself. Usually people post photos of their kids having the same expression, the same facial features etc. But she chose a photo of him and her eating an apple, where you can't see their faces. She could've posted a photo of a random kid biting an apple and it would look similar, too(nitpick)

No. 304832

>>304830
This is such a retarded nitpick. She said the photo reminded her of a picture of herself, where they're both eating a large apple.

No. 304846

>>304830
There was no reason to even post this when you're going to misread and misunderstand the point she's making.

No. 304853

>>304830
OK, this one deserves to be banned for nitpicking.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 304856

File: 1691343933166.jpeg (346.16 KB, 1179x1989, 02E9E431-6DA8-4236-B543-F9BDE1…)

girl’s looking checked OUT lately. beginning to think the only time she ever cooks now is for content, whether it’s for the kid or any of them(nitpick tinfoil)

No. 304858

>>304856
Isn't she just looking at what levi is pointing to? Nothing about her looks checked out, she's just not looking at the camera or talking.

No. 304859

File: 1691346004031.png (112.51 KB, 864x644, Screenshot_20230806-201845~2.p…)

>>304856
it's more interesting to me that Tom, who allegedly grew up poor, only "cooks" instant ramen and frozen gyoza, probably mostly for himself. Explains why he can't even peel potatoes properly. Some other comments asked for updates about his "bread phase" but in all these years of vlogs we've never seen the man actually cook anything other than some eggs.(nitpicking)

No. 304874

>>304859
Well, I think Tom being "poor" is the same as Taylor being "fat" in her childhood. Poor is a relative term and in Tom and Taylor's world lower middle class is poor.
It's no surprise since most wealthy people like to flaunt their rags to riches stories, when in reality not even 0.1% of them come from truly humble beginnings.
Anyway, I'd eat my hat if Tom ever helps around the house. He didn't get a trophy housewife to lift a finger and do house chores. The closest thing to cooking in his case is making coffee, although I didn't see Taylor posting about that for a while.

No. 304899

File: 1691416767111.jpeg (149.09 KB, 828x1456, 5A92DEAF-7EC8-4BD8-A891-C4A433…)

„Caregiver“ what is she talking about?? It’s clearly her in the picture.(nitpick)

No. 304901

>>304899
That looks like it's on the screen, not what she typed, might be an alert when someone is in the room.

No. 304902

>>304899
I think the baby monitor states that on the app when it detects someone in the room, not entirely sure tho

No. 305235

>>304899
Your trying way, way too hard to make Taylor look like an idiot. The vendetta reeks. It's obviously the monitor saying that and 'caregiver' because it's not like it can recognize faces otherwise.

No. 305246

File: 1691492141334.jpg (278.72 KB, 1080x1909, IMG_20230808_121358.jpg)

Here she goes again with pretending she ever knew any languages other than English.

No. 305251

>>305246
She's Canadian… most if not all English schools in the country teach French as a second language.

No. 305258

File: 1691511523854.jpeg (258.91 KB, 1179x1860, 39CD2687-8DD9-471C-AB00-DB25D1…)

love to see young children being driven around with no child restraints or booster chair in the FRONT seat. jfc. parents themselves and can’t even be trusted to safely babysit for a day.(nitpick)

No. 305262

>>305258
That kid is like 7 years old.

No. 305266

>>305246
>cooked slamon in french at the bottom
More proof she can't even speak English
>>305235
Aside, it's a little dystopian that there's a record of when 'caregiver is helping _child's_name_' which is uploaded online (and none of this shit is secure), since I doubt she is running a closed circuit/offline cameras here. But yeah aside from tech being creepy, there's nothing wrong with this

No. 305270

>>305266
Probably just doesn't spell check

No. 305276

>>305258
Pretty sure that's Taylor's arm? Lol that's not even close to a toddler arm anon

No. 305285

>>305276
Yeah, obviously. And one of the kids sitting in the back took a photo for Taylor's Instagram. Come up with a better justification next time.

No. 305286

>>305262
Children younger than 13 should sit in the back. I'm not surprised they didn't research it. They couldn't be arsed to buy a child seat for Levi until the last minute either.(nitpick)

No. 306117

there is an economic crisis going on in China and the rich are being targeted. Taylor might end up setting down in Canada after all.(derailing)

No. 306132

>>306117
HK is a separate, autonomous entity than China. Irrelevant

No. 306138

File: 1692798480919.jpg (349.11 KB, 1080x1880, 20230823131301.jpg)

I keked at this so hard. Sure, Taylor, a baby has been sitting on your leg, distracting you from filming and editing videos for THREE whole months.

No. 306141

>>306138
I feel like she's abandoning youtube until she gets something to make series out of (like the ivf series). I've also noticed that she only posts videos wgen she gets sponsorships to put into them. I guess she's slowly abandoning youtube and transitioning to insta only.

No. 306149

>>306138
Its not that big a deal and taking care of a kid does take up time. Unless you want to tinfoil she spends only an hour a day taking care of him.

No. 306204

>>306149
Yeah, but Taylor has a nanny, said so herself. So we all know that Taylor actually taking care of her own child only makes up a fraction of her day. What does she do with the rest of her day? According to her Instagram it's mostly styling herself, shopping or going out eating/drinking coffee drinks. I am not saying that taking care of a kid wouldn't take up time. Just that in Taylor's case that's not a valid excuse.

No. 306222

>>306204
You're basing his daily care and her downtime on videos Taylor could've taken weeks ago? The nanny isn't there 24/7, anon. We also have 0 proof they are live-in, regardless of anons sperging about HK because again, no proof. You'd think we'd see a single glimpse ever in over a year. Give the "they don't really care for him" thing a rest unless you plan to share real proof they barely spend time with him and ignore him instead of doing work.

No. 306230

>>306222
it's a government requirement that the domestic helper live with the family. It's not a government requirement that she be in Taylor's rare videos. Stop camping and caping in here.

No. 306242

>>306222
Having a baby is a valid reason to put out less content, plus she said recently that she was sole-parenting, but that doesn't explain lack of youtube content for months, literally. If she wants to remind people about the existence of her youtube channel, fine, but when it comes to justifying the lack of updates there, she shouldn't use Levi as the reason why.

No. 306263

>>306242
Because she's making tiktoks instead. She's doing something.

No. 306286

>>306242
>she said recently she was sole parenting
typical moid making a whole thing about starting a family and then delegating the work to everyone else, pretty sure he works from home too.

No. 306287

File: 1693031955270.png (1.34 MB, 864x1472, Screenshot_20230826-084114.png)

>>306263
her latest tiktok was made a month ago and required absolutely no effort. try again.

No. 306299

File: 1693045663562.jpg (1.43 MB, 2160x2160, IMG_20230826_142032.jpg)

I feel like beating a dead horse but this is the hundredth time she's reposted the damn confinement video. Has she ever reposted any other video this much?

No. 306311

>>306287
>try again
You need to calm down, she's also making shorts on instagram. She's making content, not just Youtube while still taking care of a kid. Instagram is still content creation, just not long form youtube. Idk if you're a fan or something considering how angry you get about keeping track of her posting week by week, but she's not wrong that long form content takes more time and with a kid takes longer. Putting out shorts and instagram posts, tiktoks here and there which is reuploaded content usually anyway, is still work and needs time to be curated. >>306299 she set up the camera and all just for this shot, probably took 10 mins, then hung out with Carol for a few hours. She's probably not filming every aspect of her life anymore as much since the biggest thing from her were the lengthy as hell pregnancy videos. She's probably waiting to edit a long "first year together" video. She got caught doing long form, she's going to feel pressure to put out lengthy videos now. That takes youtubers months, yes, sometimes more than 3.(derailing/infighting)

No. 306319

>>306299
Why is she still pushing this old content? One would think it's the pinnacle of her career or something.

>>306311
Oh, please, she's been putting out a video per month for the last however long, the kid can't be the reason behind no content for three whole months and that was op's point, which still stands.
"A year together" should've been filmed and edited by March lol - back when she was busy posting about herself and her "changing body" (and the confinement, again) on her kid's first birthday. She's been lazy posting on both insta and youtube ever since the trip to Canada and that's a fact. Plus, she mostly posts vlogs, so no one even expects (or wants) another "docu" series ala the ~infertility journey~.(derailing/infighting)

No. 306320

>>306319
The only thing I can think of is new followers might like this content and the people who have baby fever 24/7 which is probably her demographic

No. 306323

>>306311
lmao I literally only replied because you said she is posting tiktoks, so I went and looked. I'm not this farmer >>306242 or any other recent posts here. But you can't even stand by what you said, can you? She didn't even do a birthday vlog for Levi (which you kept telling us to wait for) nor any other big announcement (which you kept telling us to wait for). Why are you even here? No one hates her, we're amused, jesus.(derailing/infighting)

No. 306370

>>306323
Those posts are purposely talking to one anon in reference to another anon. Not saying they are the same poster.

No. 306400

>>306222
What does it matter whether the nanny is there 24/7 or not? Even if she is there just one hour a day that's one hour more that other mom's who cannot afford nannies DON'T have.
And I never said "They don't care for their child!" Where did you get that imjpression? All I said is that her child is no excuse that she could not find a couple of hours of time to edit a video IN THREE MONTHS. Nothing else.(ban evasion)

No. 306588

File: 1693398569063.jpg (261.11 KB, 1284x1843, 371046327_265242033039141_3766…)

"one of my favorite HK designers for a long time" = a Canadian living in HK, whom she's never mentioned before, kek. Vivian Luc is pretty well known in HK for gowns since the early 2010s. Taylor did those 2 trying on wedding dresses videos but didn't try on any from local designers iirc, just plugged Central Weddings, which focuses on big foreign designers almost exclusively. I don't get lying about how this designer has always been one of her favorites when it's just as positive to say how you've recently discovered her work or whatever.

No. 306594

>>306588
Taylor should look elsewhere. That is such a terrible ugly curry colored dress with very bad ill-matched lining. How is this designer popular? They sure aren't famous.

No. 306600

File: 1693410883312.jpg (463.74 KB, 1080x1896, 202308304193156.jpg)

She looks so much better without overdrawn clown lips.

No. 306616

File: 1693418748846.jpg (496.88 KB, 1080x1796, 1220230830193116.jpg)

So she's attending this "Prestige 40 under 40". I bet Tom payed a pretty buck or pulled some strings to get her on the list. Not sure how important and credible it is (probably nothing serious if she's a laureate), but looking at the list, it's full of business owners and athletes/artists. She's the only "content creator" and one of the three models (one of them walked the fashion week, the other is a singer-model).
Interesting how successful business woman Taylor got into the list for her content creation career, not her successful clothing brand.

https://www.prestigeonline.com/hk/tag/prestige-40-under-40-2023/

No. 306617

>>306600
The makeup is very pretty! Her expression otoh… Yikes.

No. 306626

>>306616
Terrible tinfoil that she was bought he way in.

No. 306634

File: 1693423817716.jpg (453.05 KB, 1008x1526, SC232308.jpg)

I'm glad she wore the red dress. It was only pretty one among those that she showed.

No. 306639

>>306634
Yeah the designer has some really really ugly clothes, no wonder taylor didn't go to her earlier and waited, smart on her

No. 306641

>>306626
that's how tons of these knock-off 40 under 40 things work, plus Taylor already was interviewed for fluff pieces for their online marketing/PR magazine. Prestige Online has no set criteria for their selections. Some singer debuted a new single at the event and sang tragically off-key and horrible.

No. 306659

File: 1693460075829.jpg (576.31 KB, 2160x2880, 2308310912740.jpg)

So, apparently she was chosen by their team. Fair enough. The first comment is so bold lol, didn't expect such a straightforward (and true) comment from one of her followers kek

No. 306663

File: 1693466821005.jpg (1.21 MB, 2592x4608, 20230831_092622-COLLAGE.jpg)

>>306594
>>306639
Of course fashion is a matter of taste, but I can't understand putting down a designer who worked for Vera Wang to praise Taylor, who says she likes the designer's work. Some of the dresses Taylor put as her favorites in her stories (picrel shows 4) are gorgeous imho. I think the mustard/purple gown she tried on would be breathtaking on a dark-skinned woman, it just wasn't right for her skin tone.

No. 306664

File: 1693467743282.png (264.42 KB, 863x549, Screenshot_20230831-092151.png)

>>306663
samefag but the designer hasn't even launched RTW yet, her whole business was bespoke gowns, so maybe that's why Taylor had limited choices, or maybe those four dresses were her top picks from what was on the racks in her size. I looked at her IG and saw that the chartreuse seems to be a signature color (the red Taylor chose is too).

No. 306666

File: 1693473219634.jpg (1.43 MB, 2160x2160, 1023083131258.jpg)

The dresses Taylor posted as examples are very pretty, but the ones she tried on for the reel didn't fit her body type and skin colour at all. The red one is gorgeous. No wonder it was the first choice.

No. 306670

>>306659
"selected by their team"
I'm gonna assume she has a PR agent who puts her forward for various things and this was one of them, it's not like they are gonna trawl the internet to find people for the accolade. She's not really well known outside of the small sphere of ex jvloggers/weeby youtubers.

No. 306677

>>306670
Yeah, it seems so. She got another award in the beginning of the year, too, before traveling to Canada. Even she didn't know what that one was for, lol. It was held in a mall, though, so definitely not as fancy as this one. I have no idea what's the purpose of these awards. I guess it's a thing? Getting awards for having X number of followers?

No. 306679

File: 1693489074245.jpg (489.18 KB, 1080x1893, 2308317364915.jpg)

They keep referring to the laureates as "class of '23". Makes it sound like a college graduation or something. Is it a lifetime award and can't be gotten twice? I'm confused.

No. 306680

>>306670
That's literally how all influencers get gigs and work

No. 306683

>>306670
do you think she’d admit to paying to be on that list? of course not. of course she was “found by their team”

tom more than likely had a hand in that i’m sure.

No. 306696

>>306683
Just think of this like other popular online events. A lot of these people have social media presences like Taylor. Taylor isn't a sore thumb out of the bunch when theres NFT shilling moids there, people in performing arts lol These people are all influencers who have done something viral or popular in HK. I don't think Taylor bought herself in. Not everything is about Tom. She does have her own manager. Just seems like people who have brought good press to HK were thrown into this.

No. 306698

File: 1693501020518.png (1.92 MB, 828x1792, IMG_9023.png)

>>306600
Had to kek at her Habsburg expression kek girl relax the jaw. Also these pictures looked to awkward?!

No. 306704

>>306698
They all look that way, I think it's because they are supposed to be relatable and quirky. Totally agree this was the right choice in dress too, the colors of the other ones are just not it >>306666 Probably only had a sample amount she could try

No. 306705

>>306641
This. All these Forbes wannabe awards that drum up hype literally rely on the people paying to win the awards to be relevant themselves.

No. 306707

>>306704
sounds like Prestige paid for the dress rental, and for some reason she seemed to go choose at the last minute. I agree, she probably could only pick from a very limited number of samples if the designer doesn't sell ready-to-wear pieces yet.

OT but I thought the maternity robes/gowns on her Insta were ethereal and pretty, I wonder if Taylor will have one made if she gets pregnant again.

No. 306709

>>306707
Probably. It's all usually interconnected for these events that get hosted in HK. You see a lot of the same people being celebrated sometimes. This is the first time I've seen Taylor me a part of it and I think it's because she got a lot of promotion via her pregnancy series, and since then a lot of baby people in HK have been hitting her up for promoting their businesses like that place they have Levi's first birthday at.

It could be this was filmed prior to make it seem last minute. I really wouldn't put stake in when things are ever filmed from Taylor or any other influencer. I do really like the flowy faerie dresses too through, those would look lovely in a pregnancy shoot.

No. 306716

File: 1693511837223.jpg (414.97 KB, 1080x1821, 430831180104.jpg)

>>306698
Kek I think she tried to do the same expression as in her pfp, but it turned out bad.
Also for a (former) model this pose is… questionable. I understand it's her favourite pose for outfits but it just doesn't work with the dress.

No. 306718

>>306716
This is a video still and she's just doing the usual pose most women do where they lean on one leg. The only thing I don't like about this dress is the weird laid folds that looks like a terrible attempt as sink wrapped rose dresses that were popular back in 2012. This designer is completely dated.

No. 306719

I've scoured the google but I just can't find any information on selection criteria for the award other than "under 40, did good things for the community". Has anyone heard of it before? Judging by the other nominees it seems a bit too ambitious. As if successful business owners who got it can't go bankrupt in a year or two or smt. It gives the impression of rich people applauding to other rich people to feel important.

No. 306721

File: 1693515193845.png (1.98 MB, 864x1657, Screenshot_20230830-175929.png)

>>306719
I really wouldn't think too hard about it. There's probably a connection to one of her PR companies for influencers (HK and China have tons). She already had her condo featured in Tatler Asia and stuff, she got known for having money, which opens doors. Here are her Prestige interviews (yawn)
https://www.prestigeonline.com/hk/people/hows-taylor-richard-celebrating-christmas/
https://www.prestigeonline.com/hk/style/beauty/prestige-beauty-awards-2023-meet-the-panel/
I can't get over these skincare companies and beauty mags thinking it's good to ask someone with often shitty skin who constantly jumps on new skincare trends to do skincare interviews.

Anyway, I thought it was funny that Prestige 40 under 40 in Taiwan had some uh… "busty model" on the list

No. 306733

>>306698
For real lol all the pictures she posted are awkward as hell. Especially the “candid” video of her skipping on the street. Cringe

No. 306749

>>306721
OK, this really puts it into perspective kek Thank you! I just checked out her insta profile and from what I understood, other than "influencing" and having big boobs, there seems to be nothing going for her kek she's also engaged to a wealthy man lol
Now I see what they mean by "success" lol. Sad.

No. 306750

File: 1693563094287.webm (1.2 MB, 1080x1920, 119832871_1694859060978815_828…)

>>306718
That pose is not any different in motion though, kek. I think the dress suits her (and doesn't look dated), but it's just my opinion.

No. 306760

>>306750
Anon said the pose didn't change.

No. 307373

File: 1694253674029.jpg (555.75 KB, 1080x1895, IMG_20230909_125856.jpg)

What is this fucking dumbass facial expression and outfit, she looks retarded

No. 307374

>>306750
i just love the juxtaposition between the caption saying 'bathroom break' and her eyefucking herself. 'fuck yes, i've just pissed or shat, time to be sexy hihi'

>>307373
you are nitpicking her face, anon… but the outfit is tragic, i mean loose on loose? the silhouette is so unflattering i want to cry

No. 307376

>>307374
That could also mean just going to the bathroom to freshen up, not like bathroom selfies are new to influencers.

No. 307442

>>307373
It's the lack of form, the overall bagginess of the outfit, except for the t-shirt's shoulders and arms. Gives her a sloppy, mannish silhouette, but not in an androgynous way, more in a "I can't dress myself" way. Even though she has long legs, the outfit makes it look like her torso takes half of her height. The unfortunate height of the pants' waist, the drop crotch and the curve of the belt are not helping it either lol

This could've worked if she wore either an oversized shirt, or a very fitted tank top.

Anyway, don't you love it when fashion influencers suck at fashion and can't dress themselves?

As for the expression, it's her go-to "fashion model wannabe" face kek she uses it all the time.(learn 2 integrate, spacing)

No. 307762

File: 1694700787030.jpg (Spoiler Image, 635.2 KB, 1080x1837, 202162934231409.jpg)

Wow, Tom really let himself go. He aged 10 years and gained 40 pounds ever since Taylor got pregnant. Yikes.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 307764

>>307762
He looks the same.

No. 307769

File: 1694711274192.webm (3.23 MB, 1080x1920, 121214406_305601348815320_4362…)

>>307762
yeah I noticed how bad he looked in this ig story too.

No. 307770

File: 1694711608143.png (819.09 KB, 864x1450, Screenshot_20230910-164315~2.p…)

>>307769
this was a pretty cringe throwback pic(samefagging)

No. 307794

>>307770
Most of her posts suck lately. She rarely posts and if she does, it's either a boring regurgitation of someone else's reel (or whatever's trending on tiktok), or sponsored posts.
And what happened to the youtube video she's been editing for ages? Is Levi still sitting on her leg and not letting her "work"?

No. 307826

>>307762
There was one where they played with the elephant toy she bought for levi and that gorilla passed by looking like he had a bulge in his pants (Story deleted already)(sage your shit)

No. 307836

>>307762
He was always old, fat and hideous… not seeing any difference

No. 307840

>>307836
He looks the exact same lol

No. 308675

Better late than never, eh? Cute idea, but she really should've posted it closer to his birthday. Literally half a year has passed.

No. 308676

>>308675
It looks like they had fun I guess. Not much milk as was expected since they don't really do much, I wonder what they will do next year since 2 year olds are a little more cognitive. Might depend on where they get sponsored to have it.

No. 308749

>>308675
Lmao this is so funny because we were all talking about how weird and empty his first birthday was, now she suddenly has a video that it was “a low stim birthday.” Wtf? I doubt Levi cares, he needs to interact with other toddlers more often

No. 308751

File: 1695835396421.jpg (1.24 MB, 2160x2160, 20230926184040.jpg)

>>308749
May be none of his playdates from the Chinese toddler club (or smt he goes to) agreed to come lol

Also apparently the vlog was ready ages ago, but she was too "anxious" to post. Why, Taylor? What's so different and controversial in it that held you back? Lol Let me guess - nothing. I love the "I filmed so much!", but in the end it's a ten minute video.

No. 308754

>>308751
Or she just didn't post it

No. 308762

>>308675
That grey cafe looks even sadder and emptier on film. Even the yellow balloons look bleak.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]