File: 1678096646817.png (359.46 KB, 720x720, 1656286890779.png)
No. 54143
>cont. from last thread, post limit>>54134AYRT, I agree. I know skid is 100% schizo layna-butthole posting and they both lurk, but the uptick in pro-BBP is wild. I'd even suspect Taylor on another relapse but it seems too nasty for her (can't believe I even said that but she seems too dumb and lacking the guile)
it's safe to say that literally any person who has a thread lurks (just look at the prettypastelplease/gurugossip situation, and sperg-chan) so it's almost frustrating not to be able to hi-cow and copping a ban when it is clearly the cow in question. my one and only gripe with this site.
I'm sure if skid or BBP keep shitposting mods will disclose their posts like they did with sperg-chan, but I remember replying to her and dasha in real time before they were revealed and not being able to hi-cow was so fucking retarded when it was clearly them.
again, I know it's the rules but sometimes a bend of rules is copacetic.
mostly great job from current admins. I got banned for reddit spacing and fully deserved it, my bad. I'm also enjoying some of the redtext quips, I like the cut of your jib new admin. myriad chuckles
No. 54145
>>54138oh my god it's too cute and pretty and adorable she's such a sweetheart i love her
>>54144yeeah, i hope it's fixed soon
No. 54148
File: 1678121967520.jpeg (63.63 KB, 564x753, A938A51D-CB99-4B92-80B9-0CB86E…)
I jus wanna say fuck the people who get mad that lc gets cutsey-fied sometimes I love it, threadpic is super cute.
No. 54152
>>54150Oh yeah I was totally mocking that exact thing honestly, I hate policing feminine hobbies or choice like of what pictures to use.
>>54151I'm glad it ended well, limiting expression is never the answer to me.
No. 54164
>>54127>exif dataWhy would I care if someone wanted to doxx me? I didn't even do anything wrong, I literally just want an answer to my original question. If someone wants to try to figure out who I am then they're weird and creepy. I was hoping to prove I'm not a tranny so I could get an answer. Other
nonny was correct though that it wasn't necessary to prove myself and was ultimately retarded of me. I thought hand posting was A Thing but I'm not immersed enough in LC culture I guess. I'm just gonna accept that something got fucked up or I did something horrible and I got a permaban and there's nothing I can do about it. Kinda sus though that you're trying to threaten or intimidate me.
No. 54179
>>54176I guess he did not use strong enough bleach on his enemas to get rid of that autism
He’s continuing in the tinfoil thread. God, that thread attracts the worst kinds of posters.
No. 54190
File: 1678152268518.jpeg (56.7 KB, 900x600, 76A80B04-8689-4778-B37C-E6D728…)
reee lolcor keeps freezing my browser reeee
No. 54198
File: 1678210848960.jpeg (32.63 KB, 500x333, 4F7D4B33-9312-415F-B530-47EEE8…)
So I was rextexxed and my ban was supposed to be end by net morning(relative to yours) so I really didn't have an issue, but then I had to leave and do some house work and my ban still had maybe 8-6 hours left but I can somehow post again
was this intentional or is this some error ?
No. 54200
>>54195In that case, I appreciate the heads up nonna. I was very determind to finally get and answer so I went out on a limb. I've been here for quite some time and am well aware of trannys and faggots, hence my speculation of a tranny janny. I will not be receiving an answer so fuck it.
>>54187I agree. It's too vulnerable out in the open. Moids just love to violate anything and everything we have and create for ourselves.
No. 54219
>>54207appears to be in the unpopular opinion thread now racebaiting about european and middle eastern phenotypes
the racebaiting and misogyny makes it so glaringly obvious it's a pol moid
No. 54240
>>54236Try "expand all images" at the top right, it usually loads faster.
>>54238shut up retard
No. 54248
>>54246Oof, yall need to move over with this
toxic bs. Yall aint r-slurred or twitterf-ggy at all, this is just yall being
problematic. Can you
trigger warning your post before posting something so
abusive? Yall are obvs
toxic. I feel like a
victim after reading this.
No. 54251
Saw that the (new?) mod has taken care of WKing in Taylor R's thread.
>>>/w/284237 >>>/w/284108Will something be done about the WKing in the jvlogger thread which is arguably much worse? An anon has threatened someone with doxing for mentioning Chris lying about his knowledge of a rapist's past. >>>/w/284781
Another WK, who may or may not be the doxxing anon, keeps getting upset at any mention of Chris' relationship with a sex predator and lying about the circumstances, when we've already established in multiple threads with proof that Chris had been informed of the predator's past prior to advising and meeting with him in person.
>>>/w/284829 >>>/w/284858 >>>/w/284869We also have a WK, who may or may not be the same anon, trying to stop any discussion of new milk via Sharla that Chris began his relationship with her while he was still with his ex.
>>>/w/284741 >>>/w/284872 Like other WKs from the past, these anons accuse other people of being from reddit, call the milk "boring" and/or or claim "no1currs."
No. 54258
>>54257Nta, but reading it all:
>no date for the breakup, its up in the air with assumptions it was Dec 2018>I'm not who doxxed someone, in fact reported it right away last night, also doxx might be a roaming and not even a legit anon locationYou have gotta stop grouping anons together. Every post from /w/ to here is anons claiming samefags. It's stupid as hell.
No. 54260
>>54259Make it make sense how no one but Lily has mentioned cheating. Even she deleted it. Who's this "insider" who fed her that? No info, for any of this, almost a year later you guys won't shut up and infight over it still. 5 threads have been ran through.
Disagreements aren't the same as whiteknighting and constantly calling people whiteknights because proof isn't available makes you look insane. Ambiguity is still tinfoiling.
No. 54262
>>54261Can you all move to a thread that's not /w/ for all this infighting? Ruining threads for unprovable shit because you assume someone who can't back up their claims is telling the truth. Idgaf if Lily was a saint, spoiler she's not, but posting basic ass proof is needed on an imageboard, not random assumptions and putting together an unverifiable timeline. The cows said themselves when what happened, but apparently it's not good enough, so back to tinfoiling about
what really happened . Honestly, holy shit.
No. 54269
>>54262This is a thread to make complaints and suggestions about modding, which was what
>>54251 was about. Anons who've either refused to lurk and want to be spoonfed, or WKs who are upset they've been found out are trying to instigate fighting here. Repeatedly lying about a cow's knowledge of a rapist's past and trying minimod a thread from discussing new milk is surely breaking lolcow rules.
No. 54290
Kiwi newfag tinfoiling, unsaged in the Rita thread
>>>/snow/1778636I'm not sure if male but they definitely type like one
No. 54294
File: 1678358790600.jpg (216.74 KB, 1005x978, IMG_20230309_114354.jpg)
>>54290The thread is made by a pedo schizo male, also spammed by the same pedo schizo male and mostly contains the pedo schizo male.
No. 54295
>>54291I find it odd that speaking like a minority of English speakers, specifically located in southern America, is the first thing esl-chans go to rather than the myriad of words
>>54293 provided. Must be the sheer amount of influence burgers have on the internet.
No. 54296
>>54293>nonniesYes
Nonny I love using
Nonnie it's not the sign of a tumblrite newfag at all!
No. 54301
My opinion is that y'all is the most superior form of addressing multiple people, and my country ass won't stop using a word that's been used for decades where I live just because chronically online ESL anons associate it with twitter. That would be like me going on a Japanese site and telling them to stop saying kawaii because I associate it with cringy weebs, like that's not a part of their language.
>>54296You still going on about this?
No. 54310
The unironical use of "femcel" should be a bannable offense as indicator for either unintegrated newfags or moids.
>>54306>>54308kys blaine
No. 54323
File: 1678397757294.jpg (405.75 KB, 1080x1716, Screenshot_20230310-082719__01…)
>>54304Best threads for observing zoomers/twitterfag posters is the Yukapon and Gyaru threads. A quick flick through will show you how easy it is to spot them.
No. 54324
Anons just posting porn for no reason in the Belle thread as usual. Easily could've just cropped the phone, but anons need to share her porn apparently and nitpick an editing app we've known for years that she uses if they just lurked or crtl+F. Seems like Edit-anon again, still just trying to make sure everyone knows Belle edits her photos at least once a week, so that any actual shitpost edits get questioned again if its her or anon editing them. The whole thread is so obvious.
>>>/w/285062>>>/w/285056Why post the porn in general when you can just do this to begin with
>>>/w/285057 I can't believe some anons have all these asshole/snatch shots of her on their phones when it's not even milk.
No. 54330
>>54329I don't think you understand what WKing actually is, anon. I 100% agree with
>>54318 too.
No. 54331
>>54328hm, no, you can't also minimod /meta/. Doxxing is pretty serious and you want to mock an anon for asking why the threat is still there? Your behavior gets more and more sus with each post.
The minimodding in the jvlogger thread is insane, but the attempts to paint Lily, the woman who was cheated on, as psycho are really sad to me. Because she deleted a tweet, she "pussied out"
>>>/w/284751Maybe I don't read the right cow threads but I don't think I've seen women here talk like this often.
No. 54341
>>54338Look at the punctuation. It's the same as the anons who posted
>>>/w/284872>>>/w/284981And some of the anons from the thread have come here to defend
>>>/w/284872 's minimoding, which got called out.
>>>/meta/54251 No. 54346
>>54344>Yeah. It's clearly the anon who's been pretending to defend Lily every time.Huh?
>They've done this in the previous threads too and it's obvious when it's them. Feel free to share proof.
>Also one of those posts was mine from that retarded wall of text. Which one?
>Anon needs to touch grass, stop minimodding people not agreeing, and fuck off if they can't handle anons not believing the thinnest damn strung together cheating conclusion ever.Except anon didn't say people should get banned for not agreeing. Anon said someone was breaking rules by minimoding and trying to stop others from discussing new milk that the couple provided yet another timeline of their relationship. And now you're trying to minimod people for calling out minimoding.
No. 54349
>>54346It's funny how you're complaining about someone who is just as annoying as you. No one has been minimodding except you spergs. A mod would've done something about all the cheating/not cheating stuff a while ago, same with the Bald crap, the doxx is clearly a roaming/vpn which is why it isn't gone. Froth moar about not getting your way. Also rebringing up old issues to try and create some agenda is fucking weird too. Mods aren't your puppets. You guys berate them when you don't get your way and berate them when bans do happen. Pick one. Clearly they don't moderate the way /w/ anons want too. Epitome of minimodding.
Also your posts in thread sound stupid and baity. All you do it nitpick apart posts. You contribute nothing but infighting.
>>>/w/285126>>Your precious Chris cheated on his gf No. 54355
Can someone explain what
>>54349 is trying to say? You're also linking two completely different anons.
No. 54357
>>54356I posted
>>>/w/285126 and not
>>>/meta/54346. So yes, two different anons. More than one person knows how to quote posts using greentext.
No. 54360
File: 1678442758418.png (420.41 KB, 770x1420, Screenshot_20230310-110201~2.p…)
>>54353You or someone like you used the same excuse when very similar-sounding posts in Taylor's thread (attacking Tom's ex-gf) were called out. You are unnecessarily shitty to the exes of scrotes you ship with someone else.
No. 54380
>>54379Legit question, for two years now even when I'm fully anon people repeat my phrases, why is this? I'm not saying I invented the can't handle the heat line I'm saying I clearly just used it and now you're using it.
I'm just overall confused and normally I don't ask shit because I can figure it out on my own but I'm genuinely confused at this point. In this instance did you think you were responding to me? I've seen it used in banal ways so it's been driving me up a wall for a while.
Thanks.
No. 54383
>>54382nta
nonny that is an extremely common phrase kek
No. 54385
this is directed to whoever has administrative access to the linux server hosting the tinyboard software.
a crazy woman (not a tranny) who's a long-time poster from our board keeps linking to your site, and i don't care for the subject matter of your site and it seems super girly and childish, but i noticed you have really bad page load speeds, and i like fixing things, so allow me to [redacted]splain some suggestions
from some brief performance profiling, one of main things slowing down page loads on your site is the fact that animated GIFs do not have static thumbnails. this means that from just four 3 MB GIFs posted in a thread, everyone who opens that thread also has to load 12 MB (or 12,288 KB) worth of GIFs. i have not measured the download throughput from my end of your server but from my estimation it's roughly 25 KB/s based on the few seconds i had to wait just for a 100 KB JPEG to load. for any troll who is malicious, he can just post thirty 3 MB GIFs in a thread and now everyone has to load 90 MB worth of GIFs just for the page to load. so while not technically a security vulnerability, this is a serious vulnerability in terms of usability for the average user and could almost be considered a denial-of-service attack.
you can fix this for future posts and threads by enabling tinyboard to generate static thumbnails for animated GIFs uploaded.
1. ensure graphicksmagick is installed. on debian or ubuntu the command is:
sudo apt install graphicsmagick
(if you're already on root account you can omit sudo)
2. ensure gifsicle is installed.
sudo apt install gifsicle
3. if you have a SERVER_ROOT/inc/config.php file, change this line:
https://github.com/savetheinternet/Tinyboard/blob/master/inc/config.php#L624to
$config['thumb_method'] = 'gm+gifsicle';
if you have separate board config.php files or an instance-config.php make sure they're not overriding $config['thumb_method'] (just remove the line from these files if it exists).
i noticed you didn't enable removing EXIF data from images uploaded. you should enable this if you care about users' privacy (then again maybe you don't since i can see this site's all about stirring drama lol).
change this line in SERVER_ROOT/inc/config.php so it's set to true instead of false:
https://github.com/savetheinternet/Tinyboard/blob/master/inc/config.php#L632$config['strip_exif'] = true;
there are other suggestions i can make which i have the instructions for since i've done it myself (e.g. implementing a simple captcha, enabling webp thumbnails to further speed up page loads, enabling webp image posting, enabling lazy-loading for catalog thumbnail images to speed up catalog page loads, adding delay to how long an individual IP can create a new thread since his/her last not sure if you implemented this already, etc.), i also have a simple anti-cp python script which runs as a cronjob (scheduled task in linux) that checks recently made threads routinely that you can check out that i've shared with other vichan/tinyboard admins i can't post publicly which partly automates the removal of the long-time cp spammers images since he has a known pattern, but i have to go now and i'm not going to expend any more effort if i'm just going to get banned
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 54388
>>54356Not only are those two different anons, there's nothing remotely similar about those comments both in style and content. If you think using the lolcow quoting function makes them the same, you need to lurk more. However,
>>>/w/284981 >>>/w/284981
>>>/w/285080 all use the exact same odd punctuation and wording, and they're all trying to claim that cheating isn't cheating while discouraging further discussion of this new milk. Not to mention,
>>54344 is deflecting by refusing to say which post they were responsible for and share evidence that the other posts were from a Lily defender, and
>>54349 is deflecting by changing the subject and accusing others of samefagging based on absolutely nothing.
No. 54403
>>54400See
>>54385 because he's actually right.
No. 54404
>>54387>>54389i am anonymous. i contributed a few bug fixes, performance optimizations, etc. to vichan (fork of tinyboard). i've known STI (creator of tinyboard), not personally, but have chatted online regarding his software. i am not a big name (or small name) nor do i even have a nickname so there's no point making speculations. that's all you need to know about me. only strictly technical questions i will answer from here on. i'm only here to impart whatever technical knowledge i've obtained from my experience i can to the admins/devs here on these /meta/ suggestion threads (i will not post anywhere else on this site since none of it interests me) to help them get up to speed on various tinyboard pecularities (it's poorly designed, i can give plenty of examples, and just plain undocumented in many cases), tips on dealing with typical imageboard and server bullshit, etc. so this site's users can have an optimal user experience. if they don't want a helping hand as i've helped a few other vichan boards, i'm totally fine with that. i have no ego and don't mind being insulted (i personally like banter, helps keep me humble and know my place as a plebian, but don't do that here please because of the attention-seeking and thread derailing rules, i am not here for that, only admins/devs are allowed to do that from here on).
>>54394this is good advice is general, especially given the lunatic cp spammer (redundant i know lol) and his pattern of posting his link-shortener links. but github.com is owned by microsoft and is where you can download the tinyboard software which this site runs on.
(no1currs, typical moid assuming women dont know shit) No. 54408
>>54405no he is 100% not a bot because a few times i caught him double-post in a human-like fashion when one of his thread postings semi-failed (one of my earlier scripts caught it) and because i implemented a captcha system (and saw it in other imageboards with captchas also with the same spammer getting through) and it didn't deter him one bit, so he obviously manually types in the captchas. he may have some aspects of his routine automated, but his weekly and sometimes daily routine is to create a link shortener URL, pick a CP pic from his CP stash, occasionally modify the pic and imprint his URL onto it, log in to VPN, go through each of the dozens of imageboards out there, and create a thread with this CP image and paste his URL in the body text ocassionally together with some child abuse keywords. this guy has been spamming imageboards with this exact routine for well over a decade. he'll never get arrested because there's no justice in this world (life's not fair) and he probably lives in some corrupt shithole (who am i kidding, every country is "corrupt" in their own way) where interpol cannot realistically intervene. it may even be a so-called "civilized" country like germany of all places (read rt.com/news/568400-germany-darknet-pedo-network/ ), pedos exist everywhere, laws and "civilization" don't deter them one bit.
No. 54413
>>54412Here you go:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/unabashedhermaphrodite-belial-the-actual-queen-actuallybella1-autisticaizen-blaine-gaven-ross-jess-ross-erika-starling.99380/He also wrote a couple threads and admitted it, namely the Rachael and Rita threads, because they told him to fuck off. Both are still cows, but it explains a lot.
No. 54414
>>54413He's not the regular cp spammer. He posts cp when he someone makes him seethe but he's not the spammer
>>54408 is talking about, the one who posts those cp threads with a link shortener and the same images.
No. 54426
>>54418regardless they are right that it was obnoxious and pretentious for me to just come in here as visitor, take a quick look, and shit all over your house like that by flippantly invalidating other people's interests like an asshole (not knowing their brains are wired differently on what they receive dopamine hits from due to different experiences in life / memories, genetics, other biological factors, whatever) and act like only my interests are
valid. it's such shitty behavior. she's right there must be something defective in my brain to fail to do such basic etiquette. need to never do that again, whether online or especially IRL. will repeat in my head never to invalidate other people's interests 50x so i don't forget
No. 54429
File: 1678528122068.jpeg (23.51 KB, 701x438, 13948382649.jpeg)
>>54426Not sure if autistic or sarcasm
No. 54438
>>54436I honestly got an expired plane ticket when I Googled the numbers, not an address. Read upthread, anons have mentioned it being a roaming/VPN and in that case, not a threat, also if the IP is landing in the middle of a state and not even a specific home location, it's not worth worrying about the doxxing either. Also the open threats were deleted as seen from this list
>>54420 The WKing accusations are hilarious because you don't like when someone has a different take.
No. 54439
>>54436super weird. I reported that but also these:
>>>/w/285258 infighting
>>>/w/285260 hi cow (Lily)
>>>/w/285279 hi cow (Lily)
>>>/w/285282 hi cow (Lily)
>>>/w/285295 "I don't see the big deal about sex trafficking"
None of these were red-texted despite 3 of them containing the exact same offense as the Solar one
No. 54447
>>54438Funny, the post is now mysteriously gone, so it was clearly a problem.
>>54442There should be some consistency and it doesn't make sense when it's only posts related to a particular cow that get redtext bans while others never seem to, and then you have the other issue of anons getting redtexted for things that aren't against rules or even borderline, while the posts they responded to about that particular cow could be. But I think you know that and before you start throwing accusations, I wasn't one of the anons who got redtexted or banned.
No. 54451
>>54431Because you come here begging mods to ban people everytime anything minor happens in that thread. I doubt a small w thread thread has that many autistic posters, so I assume it's mostly one poster.
>>54432I don't care.
No. 54453
>>54445Just to clear up something about bans/redtexting: the way the board software works is that you apply a redtext when you ban a post, so in order to redtext a post you must issue a ban for it.
If an anon has made several posts that are rule-breaking, they won't get a ban for each one, they will get one longer ban. That means only one of these posts will be redtexted, but they'll have been punished for all the others too. It has to be done this way as bans don't stack. This can lead to confusion about whether a post has received a ban particularly if they've made rule-breaking posts in several threads/boards.
There are other occasions when we may not add a redtext, but that accounts for the majority of occasions where a ban won't have one.
>>54447The post was trolling and not a danger in any way, we deleted it because anons wouldn't stop shitting up the report queue regarding it. In the end it was easier to remove it, since it added no value and it was upsetting anons.
>>54450Based on the post history of the users in that thread who are derailing, they aren't moids, they're genuine users who really hate camwhores and can't keep it to themselves (including the one who posted "I love camwhores").
No. 54455
File: 1678570906314.png (15.95 KB, 926x598, Screenshot 2023-03-11 163717.p…)
>>54453> (including the one who posted "I love camwhores")Thanks admin. Alrighty then, that's pretty bleak. Also did I have to get banned for this (picrel)?
No. 54480
File: 1678602467824.jpg (195.48 KB, 1080x2012, Screenshot_20230312-012611_Bra…)
In the Pixieelocks thread on /w/. I'm not really complaining though since it made me kek.
No. 54484
>>54478lying to defend a cow
lying about what anons say about a cow to make anons look deranged
defending a cow from the most minor opinions
basically defending cows beyond what is reasonable.
what is YOUR definition of WKing? I keep asking and you never answer.
No. 54486
>>54485I know that the anon (you?) who writes things in Taylor's thread like
>anons get mad when Taylor isn't blamed for infertility>anons say she's gained weightis just straight-up lying, there isn't any evidence of these claims. So idk what you're referring to with some "narrative" and "facts" - either farmers posted these opinions or they did not. They in fact did not. So these are lies.
No. 54505
Anon can just not watch the video then even though there were announcements in it, but okay.
Derail with the attempt to infight. It's like the farmhand's post did nothing. Don't blame anons for not greentexting and then throw a fit that a video doesn't have good enough milk when the rest of the thread is low effort infighting for 3 days. Instead lets derail about content actually posted. You anons never learn then get mad when banned after the fact.
>>>/w/285555 No. 54512
File: 1678649640799.jpeg (71.92 KB, 1052x730, E1CD6D5E-20D3-42B1-91F7-40C736…)
Why did anon get banned for this? She provided a source to another anons question lmao
No. 54541
>>54512This ban was a mistake and has been reversed. The post was reported multiple times and the farmhand who banned it did not take the proper care to examine the post in its context before banning it.
There are only a few mods active at one time, and the list of reports can get into the hundreds quickly.
With the addition of more moderation staff, less poor decisions will be made as there will not be as much pressure on each individual to make decisions quickly.
We appreciate you bringing mistakes like this to our attention! We welcome any women who care about the future of moderation on lolcow to apply using the link in the announcement above.
No. 54543
>>54542Seconded, I’m super relieved something is finally being done.
I really hope the quality of posting improves/they go back to Reddit, otherwise threads will just be redtexted posts!
No. 54575
>>54571Look at the name of the board the thread resides in and op says
>A thread for discussing everything tech-relatedI mean as retarded you think discussion is it's not really offtopic to discuss cyber security or tech related conspiracy. From an outside perspective I'm not sure why you feel farmhands have to step in, it all seems pretty harmless?
No. 54579
File: 1678708245777.jpg (1.82 MB, 2027x3153, RDT_20221011_18100826084268506…)
CP IN FRONT PAGE. POSTING IMAGES TO GET IT OFF FRONT PAGE.its in /pt
No. 54582
File: 1678708385783.jpg (846.69 KB, 640x1054, RDT_20230311_02122757400437800…)
More
No. 54595
>>54594I'm not this anon
>>54576 and yeah some people got banned recently but there have still been Chris and Sharla fans ITT for a long time.
No. 54617
File: 1678731239990.png (9.29 KB, 1708x154, Repost of what farmhand said.p…)
>>>/w/285773
Anons can't help but continue trying to bring up old shit again after mods said to stop
No. 54624
>>54603I suggested this because people who know how to use imageboards don’t care about a thread being on autosage, if there’s milk to discuss it’ll happen. It deters the newfags, why wouldn’t you want it autosaged if the quality of posting improved?
>>54609I’m sorry anon but how does a thread being on autosage change anything being posted about Sharlas OF? I don’t want to read nitpicks about her body, have you seen Belles thread?
Seeing both of your replies just makes me think it’s a good idea, all you have to do is search for it in the catalogue. Policing isn’t going to deter newfags
No. 54630
>>54628No anon, it’s because the threads have been absolute hell. Autosaging a thread doesn’t stop people discussing milk, it just stops it from being bumped to the top of the catalogue. Don’t assume my aim is to stop conversation because it isn’t.
If anons happen to ask for it to be autosaged when there’s ‘milk’ I expect it’s because it keeps getting repeatedly bumped to the top with unsaged shitposts.
No. 54652
>>54651I'd rather be put into timeout and be able to learn than have this place continue to go into anarchy.
Keep it up Cerbim! Thank you for letting women have a space to shitpost and vent!
No. 54670
>>54658I think the vast majority of posters in that thread need to learn to integrate and lurk more.
It has gone so far past the normal rules/culture that I don’t know if it can be fixed. Which is funny cos that’s exactly why PULL closed…
Maybe mods could think about whether it actually still fits in /w or should it be in /ot or even locked? I don’t think the quality of conversation is ever going to change, no matter how many times people are banned or put into time out
No. 54673
>>54671Yeah I agree. Something for admin to think about!
They are doing a good job so far, one can only hope!
No. 54678
>>54677If you can post, that sounds like your ban got lifted but something went wrong. Try
clearing cookies and it should be normal again.
No. 54685
File: 1678928159048.png (5.67 KB, 1349x100, thumbnail_Capture.png)
>>54684>>54684this is what I keep getting, along with the "You are banned" message, the only way i can use the site is when it's reversed.
No. 54704
>>54702As
>>54703 has said, incognito doesn't change your IP. Browsing in incognito just makes it so your browsing history/passwords etc don't get saved. But I looked and you don't have any posts that were redtexted at all. Can you link the post itself? I don't see it.
No. 54708
>>54704this one
>>>/ot/525043 I should state that my family uses some chinese service for internet so maybe that's a factor
No. 54757
Why not just lock the current unpopular opinions thread?
>>54756I agree with you. It was actually be devastating to lose the thread because it is a really fun thread when the milk is flowing. Wasn't it in snow at one point anyways? I never saw how it was different from other general threads in snow.
No. 54764
Anon derailing about prostitution
>>>/w/286738 which the girls aren't even doing. Taking censored photos on OF really brings out the idiots. It's just derailing and obvious bait.
No. 54766
>>54765How do you not notice the annoying capslock spammer. Also everything
>>54759 said
No. 54768
verified male (talking about his cock) sperging in /snow/ and threatening to dox people (kek):
>>>/snow/1791287One of many of his posts. Ban this schizo
No. 54777
File: 1679237612163.png (30.92 KB, 784x718, Screenshot_20230319-155154.png)
>>54776>>54775yeah here, for anyone who missed your autism.
No. 54782
File: 1679293179349.png (20.33 KB, 1188x581, Capture.PNG)
What is this, fucking Reddit?
No. 54812
>>54404So some random turns up and offers actual solutions after two plus years of fucking around and it's no1curr? And then a bunch of moid sperging and saying oh admin doesn't need help, look how well the site is running!
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. God this site is depressing now.
No. 54845
When were threads based on posts all from 2017 and 2018 considered good milk?
>>>/w/287724 All anon has been posting is stuff over a year or more. She doesn't deserve her own thread when the posts are all about men giving reviews of the cow's sex work.
When did men's opinions from a porn site or reddit become milk anywhere on this site? Especially if the thread is about a women,but anons only focus on what men have to say? This isn't a cow's thead. This is a thread anons made just to shitpost other people's takes (men) bc they think men have the most valuable criticism of women.
When did a committed relationship, no longer doing sex work, cow become thread material when the biggest recent milk in years is an age gap when shes over 25 years old?
No. 54848
>>54845I don't mind Amina but that thread and the OP were obviously written by a newfag (or a retard, idk kek)
And I agree, scrotoids reviews aren't milk.
No. 54851
Hi admins, farmhands and jannies. We have potential milk in the Pixielocks/Jillian thread. This poster doxxed herself as Jillian’s friend and previously documented snowflake in the confetti club threads.
>>>/w/286408 Could you check the post history of that IP address and redtext her previous posts? (Keekweek style) This could reveal if she had any doing in previous milk reveals such as Jillian’s drag show stalker, the pics posted of her townhouse etc.