File: 1674777559953.png (1.14 MB, 1096x1044, Teresa-1.png)
No. 51694
File: 1674790192498.jpg (158.28 KB, 1080x424, Screenshot_20230126_192620_Chr…)
What is with /w/ and calling everyone a WK? This is ridiculous. Pointed out an image was posted on an imageboard because anons complained the image wasn't good enough for them even though it followed posting rules and that makes me a WK for some reason. /w/ is miserable to post on.
>>>/w/278958 No. 52080
File: 1674825149912.jpg (67.57 KB, 800x450, crypto.jpg)
Is it worthy to start a series of threads about Cryptocurrency?
I was thinking we could do it in /ot, share good materials to learn about it, tips, talk about investments and economy in general
No. 52145
>>52131I thought so too until it turned into the fact that there is a massive cosplay mean girl clique the same way Bunny and the other girls had one. This is very milky and someone is in there larping as a guy when it looks so much like one of the girls throwing a fit which I mentioned in a different report
>>52130 even Momokun is in on the action and the whole thing is a mess. It should be a Mimsy thread instead. I don't even know who this Kimi nobody is.
No. 52216
File: 1674924330211.png (39.64 KB, 1719x545, w wk spergs.png)
Just browsing the Venus thread and it has the same cancer accusing anons claiming anyone not agree with them or anything they say is a WK like I mentioned
>>51694 This isn't conducive to actual discussion and derailing like this every time someone says something you don't like is absolutely a way to bait infighting. Can #admin or a mod bring up maybe implementing rules regarding this type of bait being bannable or calling anons WKs in a ban warning or something? It's very spastic and comes off underage and you have to be 18+ to post here.
>>>/w/279186>>>/w/279181>>51694In the instances they are being used, WK in all these occasions, doesn't even make sense.
No. 52280
>>52279I didn't refresh or notice, lol, sorry.
No, now everyone thinks anyone with a following, even if it's 200 people, deserves a private thread and it's just a waste of space. Maybe /w/ needs a cosplay e-thot specific thread, but then it just re-routes back to Cosplay Thot thread and then in /snow/ there's the general IYHT or the other e-thot thread there.
No. 52281
File: 1675068140187.jpeg (66.2 KB, 395x432, offwithtthehead.jpeg)
cp on /snow
No. 52292
>>52291Example of the race derailing:
>>>/w/279513>>>/w/279514It's just bait to talk about race.
No. 52319
File: 1675123075493.jpeg (76.46 KB, 681x1023, 1408534830067.jpeg)
gore in /ot/
No. 52320
File: 1675123177180.png (130.13 KB, 1170x618, Untitled copy.png)
gore in /ot/
No. 52333
>>52327Omg, I didn't mean to delete my previous response without saving it. It's too much to type out, so I'll just reduce it down to where I think cows could go on /snow/ if mods might want to actually consider this or think about #threadmover some on over there:
>Venus, keep her thread, she actually does have repeatedly new milk out of everyone on /w/>Belle/Terry/Nicole/Deer/HimeAhri/Gyaru thread/Kimi [new thread made on /w/ a few days ago]/Lori/Mostflogged/Natasha/Dakota, Instagrammers You Hate, Terry I'm not 100% sure about because anons don't seem to really discuss milk, they just post stuff he posts to laugh at him, but I don't think that's worth it's own thread on /snow/>Taylor/Sarah Spaceman/Yumi/JVloggers [the entire thread since most of it only talks about Chris and Sharla anyway and all their milk is via YouTube]/Trash Taste thread/Aki, YouTubers You Hate>Jillian, I guess she should keep her own thread, could maybe fit her into the YouTubers You Hate thread, but her threads fill up so fast, that mods would need to do something about all the random nitpicking and zooming in edits and such. It gets clogged up without much real milk discussion a lot>Don't see why the Cosplayers thread, since both are very slow anyway, can't just be one thread in general since it does get crossed sometimes anyway based on if the cow now does OnlyFans which tends to be 70% of the time >Kelly can honestly go in the Alt Girls thread, she isn't updated enough even though the milk about the NK stuff is really cringy and nice to see how obsessed she gets about it>Snow Queen/Auress/Sparrow/8Chan/Ironmouse can all die out/be locked>Lolitas and Vocaloids can go into their own threads. Vocaloids should really go to /g/ or something tbh. Isn't there a music you hate thread? Just my idea.
No. 52345
>>52331so what? everything doesn't have to be novel to be funny. You're not the arbiter of what's milk.
>>52327sounds like you just don't like this site tbh. I mean, yes, many of these people were or are massive cows. You don't get multiple threads on lc, dating back years, for doing nothing. Lori and Kevin have substantial drama that keeps playing out and I don't want to have to sift through other egirls to find it. HimeAhri is in a prime grifting mode and maybe something will come of it, maybe not. Some cows curate a certain image and gear up for a big move - why can't their little changes and shit get documented? Often in retrospect we can see what a cow wanted to do: a good example is Jillian, who breadcrumbs mental illness diagnoses for years. The buildup was slow.
I wasn't really a fan of splitting off /w/ when it happened, but now that it exists, changing it would be even more annoying. Sometimes cows go dormant and then start producing again. I prefer that these people have their own threads vs. having to read a bunch of uninteresting shit to find out what happened to them. When Aly_realrecover's threads got locked bc of some BS reason, it was stupid to have to read about her in a general pro-ana thread. Luckily, we got her thread back after awhile.
I also oppose locking long-standing threads just because a couple anons want that. It's suspicious given all the weird WK activity on /w/. Mods and admin should not be swayed by weirdos who desperately want to control threads - no sane person unrelated to a cow should care what anons write on the internet. If they care enough to scream and beg for threads to be locked on an imageboard, they are either insane or somehow close to a cow. Like there are threads without real milk anymore, where I even feel a bit bad for the subject, but I would never insist they be locked because there's no good reason for that.
No. 52350
>>52345closing /w/ is just another step into closing all the cow boards and having this site just be /ot/, /m/, /2x/, etc. these are the same people who came out a few years ago pushing the same narrative; they are not slick. they wanted to retcon lolcow, turn it into a pc/neutral safespace, keep all the off-topic/casual boards and to nuke everything else because it either wasn't interesting to them or they just didn't like it because of xyz reasons. usually something to do with either 'bullying', sex ("i don't want to see naked people!" kind of thing), or racebaiting ("why do you guys only pick on x race???"). they quieted down somewhat because the few oldfags who still come here started getting on them about it, but i see they're still determined to whitewash the boards. notice how they never say the same thing about cleaning up /ot/ or /m/ or /g/ even though many of those boards, specifically /ot/, have a lot of one-off threads that never went anywhere, spam threads, and just other crap that no one really cares about that's slowing down the site and cluttering the catalogue. i know someone is going to chimp out on me but i have to be honest because i keep seeing this over and over and over again.
No. 52353
>>51603OT is covered in badly covered scrote bait.
>>women who dress like sluts shouldn’t be defended. >>cute twink watches blackened porn!! What should I do? We uwu a totes married couple though. Etc
No. 52359
>>52351nta but the culture is only different recently, but something
definitely needs to be done. the shift from laughing at cringy weebs pretending to be asian to being offended by "asianfishing" says enough. the reason /w/ was made is because anons on /snow/ bitching about weebshit even though weebshit was always on that board. i think making it at all was a mistake. there are cows on both boards that clearly go on the other and weebshit in general is becoming mainstream tiktoktard crap so the board is full of them. coupled with the fact that most of the pulltards migrated there. i still think /w/ would be good in theory though but it's too arbitrary.
No. 52368
File: 1675191228433.jpg (163.93 KB, 1080x590, Screenshot_20230131_105305.jpg)
>>52367Samefag, found the answer in the Cerbmin thread
No. 52385
>>52383I just came to post that jannies don’t give af about it anymore and that’s supposed to be the most scrupulous board here, please moderate it better. It takes less time because as anon said it’s dead and nobody even makes it to pt anymore unless some newfag posts a thread there without understanding. There are posts I’ve reported that haven’t been addressed after 8+ hours but that shaytorium bs gets flagged asap in snow.
im a shayfag too, no h8 cmon the board that’s supposed to have the most moderation has none. Cows are dying this site will be only /g and /ot soon enough. Rip. Might as well change the url
No. 52387
>>52386I’m aware there’s not always a redtext. Why is almost every instance of a ban redtetxed in snow vs pt it’s not and it takes hours even if they are redtexted?
>even in moos thread >even>there are mods for /pt >not good defenseI don’t even know where to start
No. 52397
File: 1675269761091.png (134.68 KB, 1050x357, Screenshot 2023-02-01 11.42.12…)
>>52394Funny, there's a deranged TiF on Kiwi Farms who was talking about being "extremely active" in the Vocaloid thread and in the next post how she is always "arguing in the third person", she was sperging out in the KF lolcow.farm thread and got put in her place
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/lolcow-farm.11942/page-50#post-14537876 she also face-doxed herself in the KF telegram and is generally an attention-seeking nuisance. I bet that's who you're dealing with.
No. 52406
>>51603CP in /snow/, admins delete that
(already reported that)
No. 52509
This anon in /w/ keeps hi cowing without explicitly saying it any time anons refuse to derail about Reddit alpha male bs or tangents about fake milk. They just quote anything they think is a cow or Elon Musk bait posts.
>>>/w/280122There been no milk in this thread for weeks, but plenty anons posting like this instead to try to infight. It just fills the thread. Jvlog really needs to just go to YouTube in /snow/. You can't even talk about anyone else in that thread unless it's Sharla and Chris because everything else gets harassed and shut down.
No. 52515
>>52509Scrotes spend more time in the Jvlogger thread complaining about any mention of Bald's connection to Chris than nonnies actually talk about Bald, and Chris continuing to follow a known sex predator after Bald's insta was temporarily gone and following Tate's arrest, despite being warned by his own fans for a third or fourth time about Bald's past and acknowledging the allegations, is real new milk. Chris insisting that idolizing Andrew Tate is not
problematic and just a difference of opinion is also real and not fake milk. But nonnies would spend even less time mentioning Bald if you scrotes would stop whining that there's nothing wrong with Chris meeting with a self-professed rapist (who's been arrested for rape before in Chris' own home country) and lying that he didn't know about Bald and only met with him, when Chris also advised the alleged rapist on his work despite being warned multiple times. Is it any coincidence that the scrotes who complain about any mention of Bald also insist that a non-vlogger's (Lily) random's selfies are more relevant to the thread than a jvlogger (Chris) actually meeting with and advising a guy who brags about sexually assaulting women? What I don't understand is why the jannies haven't done anything about these Chris worshippers who've been sitting in the thread for over a year now. Defending a cow for supporting a rapist and vendetta posting about the cow's ex would've got you banned in the past or at least redtexted.
No. 52521
I feel like that the bird love thread
>>>/ot/1490027 is better suited in /m/ instead of /ot/
No. 52528
>>52527Nta
It was milk. A couple of whiteknights don't speak for all anons. If it was norm who had met up with bald and advised him you wouldn't be saying that it wasn't milk.
No. 52536
File: 1675589305288.jpg (95.28 KB, 821x868, 1674345399035.jpg)
>>52535Just stop posting.
No. 52551
>>52548I only wrote
>>52540 so try again
No. 52562
>>52548I'm
>>52532 and I'm not the one who brought up Bald. It was a WK yet again who also completely lied that anyone who talks about any jvlogger other than Sharla and Chris gets harassed and shut down in the thread.
>>52509 No. 52563
Since there's now admins, maybe we can post wishes.
My top points are "better moderation" and "better communication" but I'll leave it aside for now, because the first is so complex and the second is so simple.
That being said, here we go:
>offsite communication
Something that doesn't rely on any LC specific hardware to function and consequently can't be taken down by any attacker or technical failure. Something like telegram channel would probably be ideal. It would also be extremely easy to set up and maintain compared to any self made alternative; you can literally do it in a few minutes. I know there are plans to set up a redirect that sends Nonnies to a landing page in case the site goes down, but that sounds like it would require far more work. I am not against a landing page for that, but I think it should be lowest priority compared to the many other things that need work and can't be done "on the cheap".
>(you)
It's a pain in the butt to find people who replied to you, and over night I usually drop conversations simply because there's no straightforward way to find your own posts, let alone replies to them.
>autosage
Fill the email field with sage by default and make people edit it if they want to bump.
>.mp4 support
Most websites provide .mp4 files nowadays and the need to convert them is annoying and makes people not post relevant content, or only post a screenshot of a video instead of the video itself.
>media archiving and download guide
I think the site should host a guide that explains how to download media from the big social media sites (twitter, IG, TT, facebook, etc), and how to create archived links to posts, so that evidence exists after the original was deleted.
No. 52564
>>52554It is very odd behavior to camp in /meta/ and a select few /w/ threads and just constantly start arguments with other anons, and seemingly contribute nothing else but "not milk" screeching. Of course this being an anonymous board there is no proving this one way or another, but the passion with which Sharla and Chris are defended from the most minor of criticisms is…interesting. Couple it with "some" nonas insistence that Lily is a milky topic, and often random bemoaning of them not being "allowed" to talk about any other cow besides C & S. I don't know, makes you think. Even if it isn't one of them, which is totally possible, that thread (plus some others on /w/) have a weird vibe. Like Pewdiepie's wife being pregnant is more 'milky' than Chris helping some rapist guy. Also weird misuse of the word bait, like this.
>>>/w/280291>>>/w/273533Really if you just search 'bait' ITT you'll see somebody use it constantly in response to normal posts that are vaguely "against" Chris and Sharla.
No. 52574
>>52563>It's a pain in the butt to find people who replied to you, and over night I usually drop conversations simply because there's no straightforward way to find your own posts, let alone replies to themi find it super easy, just ctrl+f or scroll to the post. and if you have cookies enabled most browsers jump to where you left off
>and how to create archived links to poststhe site already does this automatically whenever someone links a post
No. 52591
>>52584>>52585the jvlogger thread has became a lost cause ever since sharla chris newfags have camped it out for months ready to simp out at moment's notice. Then once chris hanged out with that sexpat rapist there's been a noticeable amount of scrotes
i don't think there's any other thread on lolcow that has that much infighting as much as the jvlog one and don't even know if it's fixable until they break up
i think many kinda just gave up
No. 52600
File: 1675653045357.png (80.08 KB, 496x440, 2023-02-06_03-56-47.png)
The idea behind posting a wishlist was to facilitate discussion, so please feel free to post your own ideas or criticisms.
>>52596>Some of the things that anon listed are features on nucow like (You)s, mp4 support (iirc, lynxchan supports mp4, i could be wrong though).All true, it also supported 4 files per and 50mb or 100mb (I forgot) overall file size per post. It was really great, all it needed was a good looking CSS and the old threads imported and ready when it went live. I said in the other thread I hope admins consider using lynxcow instead of trying to re-invent the wheel on the current platform and don't dismiss that possibility out of hand because some people lost their minds over it.
> I wholeheartedly disagree with offsite communicationA telegram channel
can be set up so it is a list of posts by the channel owner, there's no circle jerking because there are no comments, not even reactions, it all be turned off, so it's just the posts. I appended an example of a telegram post set up the way I have in mind. By off-site communication I mean strictly one way: admins -> users. Off-site simply because it is more robust.
>Archive.is isn't hard to figure out and there are guides on youtube-dl and download managers you can find through google.Even elite private torrent trackers have guides for the most basic things. It's generally a good idea to provide users with the information they need to do what you want them to do. The harder you make it for people to be good, the more of them will not be good.
A list of the best programs that actually work, with a short explanation on how to use them, would do wonders for people's ability to post and back up content.
>>52595Having the intended default posting style
NOT be the default setting is just bad design. The reason you complain about it in the first place is that it doesn't work for keeping idiots away, it just has the effect that threads are constantly wrongly bumped. Banning random people for forgetting to enter sage after posting on /ot/ for a while will not help either.
If you want to ban idiot posters who don't fit in then you should be able to do that without having the site set up in a random inconvenient way to try to "gotcha" them.
No. 52601
The newfag who coped a ban in the Gyaru thread is back trying to bait infights by typing like a maniacal fedora wearer
>>>/w/280380 please God discourage the unhinged zoomers in that thread from not integrating.
No. 52608
>>52600Offsite communication is fucking retarded. "Hey, go download this other app you're never going to use to get communications that should be on site anyway". Just set up an lcf twitter account or something if you're worried about 'robust' options. View off the web, use as needed, done.
Anyway …
Please start locking off shit old threads. Thread requests exists for if something changes and new milk flows. Threads like
>>>/snow/1523147 - redtexted as a shit thread - should be locked so they don't get random bumps. Let the active threads rise and lock off all the old shit.
No. 52618
>>52600>Having the intended default posting style NOT be the default setting is just bad designThat's your opinion, I like the design it's almost like a vetting process. I don't know why you want to make it even easier (it's already very simple) for people who can't be bothered to lurk before posting. Nor where the assertion comes from that I'm complaining specifically about sageing when referring to integration as a whole. A few bans and they'll either fuck off or lurk moar and integrate, it's that simple.
>Banning random people for forgetting to enter sage after posting on /ot/ for a while will not help either.This is a non-issue as far as I know, temp bans for bumping threads with crap have been a thing here for years. I haven't heard of anyone complaining about this being a problem.
>>52565Kek, seconding.
No. 52622
>>52615Nta
Neither of those posts were bait kek.
No. 52630
File: 1675693785364.png (17.52 KB, 640x238, 2023-02-06_15-21-20.png)
>>52626I was curious and looked at the rules, and according to them Pippa doesn't quite meet the threshold of "lolcow" as laid out in the rules for /snow/, but /w/ is supposed to be about nothing but cosplayers, which Pippa is decidedly not.
My five cent is that she belongs on /snow/. I don't think the rules are that strict anymore, especially not with all the community watch threads that are already on there.
Whatever you end up doing, I'm looking forward to your thread!
No. 52646
Why do these /w/ anons not know how to post? They bump their threads with thot photos for no reason that don't even have milk, its like a screenshot of an onlyfans leaked site
>>>/w/280459 Learn to integrate and post. No wonder people get so pissed about the state of that board. The anons on there are retarded.
No. 52658
>>526534chan is intended to be a general purpose imageboard though, while lolcow was created as a revival of an off-shoot of the
drama threads of one specific board on 4chan. Wasn't crystal cafe also created as an alternative to the non-cow boards for those who just want a female-oriented imageboard without necessarily caring about lolcows?
>inb4 b-but cc is full of trannies!!Sounds more like a self-fulfilling prophecy honestly? Anons refuse to go there because of its tranny reputation, which really does leave CC slow and empty but still with a disproportionate amount of trannies because there aren't enough anons putting them off. Though even the moderation on CC does seem pretty damn slow, I wonder if they too are disheartened thus not bothering. But I also admit to being a hypocrite myself, I don't really like posting there because it really does feel almost abandoned, though if non-cow-boards-only anons mass migrated there it would sure gain more traction.
No. 52666
>>52664I'd also say that troon thread posters specifically feel different from other cow board posters and seem to have more overlap with the non-cow board posters. I fully understand the importance of
terf ~safe spaces~ (for lack of a better term) considering most internet spaces are becoming pro-troon echo-chambers or, if not that, right-wing moids and their handmaidens echo-chambers, though I'm not sure whether troon threads should stay on /snow/ as milk threads. Sure, trannies are pretty much inherently milky, but those threads very often get derailed with blogposting, general GC/radfem discussion, /pol/fagging and baiting which should not really be considered appropriate in
cow threads. I guess /2X/ should have really been properly taken care of from the start so
terf discussion would go there instead, but apparently oldmin(?) hated terfs and only reluctantly catered to them?
No. 52672
>>52669Lmao what, it's anti-ot people (I don't even think it's cowboard-only users specifically, since they just ignore the board) constantly asking for it to be deleted. There are some vocal anons shittalking drama boards on /ot/, but I don't see any of them asking for it to get shut down. In fact what you mentioned is exactly what "close /ot/" "anons" did on meta. The assumption that /ot/ user=newfag is also retarded, as most newfags find lolcow through searching cows on google.
Also Venus posting here, what?? You sound like one of the anons on CC going on about history erasure because some people don't like the porn banners.
No. 52680
>>52674I don't know what you get out of lying about this and making up twisted tl;dr stories. It's not even that long ago and everyone can just look it up and see what actually happened.
>>17616>>18252>>18267>>16503>>16535>>16758>>16872>>16974>>17140>>17141>>17144>>17143>>17148>>17148>>17174>>17203
>regular lolcow users were tired of the /ot/ radfem/manhate usersAnd polls showed those "regular users" were a minority of vocal samefags. Funfact, the same "regular users" also STILL complained about them after the containment board and all related threads got shut down in their will, despite it being against the majority. And surprise, surprise, they then immediately started targeting /ot/ in the same way after having success the first times. Above quotes very related, especially the "just do it" samefag.
>but new users started using it to escape the tranny bs on most websitesAgain, most anons find lolcow and thus also /ot/ through cow threads, making them drama board or ex-drama board users. Even the few /ot/-only ones shitting on the drama boards said they initially came from cow threads. But the "anons" who got /2X/ and then the other threads closed down loved to claim that they're akschually all newfag radfems from reddit/twitter etc rather than accept that the userbase, which includes oldfags, naturally adjusted to real life happenings/the Zeitgeist and getting older. Trannies weren't as much of an influence in 2014 or cgl/sr times and a good chunk of us weren't or were barely adults back then, hence the tolerance for disgusting moid shit.
No. 52693
>>52687Anon, /ot/ which used to be /b/, is
atleast 8 years old. Everything anon is saying
did happen 5 years ago.
No. 52705
>>52697Literally just search the catalog
>>>/ot/2923 /ot/ is referred to as /b/. the post was made 7 years ago.
No. 52706
>>52705I thought it was
at least 8 years old?
>>>/ot/172177Stop with the retarded psyops already, this is pathetic.
No. 52709
>>52706>I thought it was at least 8 years old? Are you just throwing things at the wall at random in the hope that it sticks now? That post isn't the first in /b/. Literally look at the post number. This is the first post
>>>/ot/1305 Look a little closer there. 8 YEARS. I see 8 years. Are doing this on purpose? Just reading the posts upthread will answer your questions. Open your eyes and read
>>52693>/ot/ which used to be /b/THEY WERE MERGED DUMBASS. Do you need it to be spelled out for you? FFS, the post you linked yourself explained it!
>/b/ and /g/ have been consolidated into one off-topic board called /ot/ No. 52711
File: 1675742219473.png (29.75 KB, 1323x321, a.png)
>>52706Just in case you didn't catch it. Should I make a powerpoint next?
No. 52718
>>52713Nice try but I'm only
>>52709 and
>>52711. it's not hard to admit you're wrong. Try a better strategy than just accusing everyone of samefagging, okay? It's getting old.
>Meanwhile I'm still waiting on those receiptsI fucking fed them to you, what more do you want? Maybe I should make the powerpoint after all. Also,
>deflectingYou're the one who diverted in four posts
>>52687 >>52697
>>52703 >>52706 to talk about the existence of /b/ and how old it was or wasn't. I don't know anything about cow vs /ot/ rivalry because I don't care for orchestrated drama so I'll dip out here. I do however know about how old /b/ was and how and when /ot/ was born, which you couldn't get even after finding the post that proved you wrong kekk. More than halfway convinced you're baiting at this point.
No. 52724
>>52722Well, I did spoonfeed you in
>>52680 so I wouldn't say no one.
No. 52730
>>52670this happened a few years ago, like 5 or 6 i want to say? i remember it started mainly sometime between 2016 and 2017, when there still a number of staminarose and /cgl/ users here. there was a really big blowout at the end of the year around christmastime and that was the start of the issues we've had with moderation over the years.
>>52672>You sound like one of the anons on CC going on about history erasure because some people don't like the porn banners.i recognize you. aren't you the anon who was telling people to "get a grip" when they were talking about how annoyed they were with the banner whining? you're weird. you've been trying to larp as a based oldfag for a while since the bunker threads but then outing yourself when actual oldfags who have been on this site for longer than covid call you out on your bullshit. all of the stuff you've quoted as well when people dressed you down is shit you can find easily off of kiwifarms, so it's obvious that you haven't been here that long and aren't familiar with board history.
No. 52733
>>52731Lmao based anon
I thought as LC users anons would know that porn is not good for the bases and benefit of us lol even if its so called "board history"
Time changes things and if what people say about cc is to be taken seriously that place is full of troons, scrotes, and nlog-ing anons kek so obviously it makes sense why the same retarded takes appear here if we have dual users
No. 52740
>>52733Exactly.
>>52735>does exactly the larping behavior that I mentioned to a tAbsolute kek.
>your sentiment is /ot/ centric Your entire posts were about /ot/fags, which is what we discussed.
>>52674 Still waiting on those receipts of /ot/fags from 2 years ago- no wait, 5 years ago- no wait, 8 years ago calling for drama threads to be closed and anons speculating over venus wanting the cow boards shut down.
>being on the site for 4 or 5 years doesn't mean you're an oldfag.I thought I was here since corona? The irony of you saying removing porn banners is history erasure, then referring to the current state of snow as a reason why they should stay tells me you are mad projecting.
>y-your attitude isn't reflective of older users anyway.I'm sorry for my wrong think opinion, queen of oldfags. I'm revoking my oldfag license as we speak.
No. 52741
>>52740Oh
that's what you wanted, not just to see how old /ot/ was.
No. 52751
please do something about the wks in the venus thread.
>>>/w/275598if i said those things about any other cow in any other thread i would get banned.
No. 52753
>>52751Go get your panties out of a twist and stop defending a pedo and thinking calling him out as such is some weird defense of Venus. Ken is disgusting. He is not a
victim.
No. 52755
>>52753Both sides needs to shut up.
> Oh no! Poor scrote-ken-kun! He was stabbed!versus
> Nah Peenus is the true victim here uwu. Mommy Margo bad !No one care. This is not milk and I hope farmhands will ban any further derailing about this stuff.
No. 52760
>>52734Do you even know how to read? Let me dumb it down, CC users whining about porn are dumb if they happen to also be an LC user and continue the same rhetoric here. Just because you happen to be a person who lingered around in retarded spaces the longest
aka oldfag kek doesnt make your opinion better
No. 52803
File: 1675962324451.jpeg (383.74 KB, 824x1005, 52F144B8-3C55-4EA5-95D3-FD680D…)
CP IN SNOW reported it
No. 52806
>>52735There's no point arguing with the pearl-clutchers, anon. If they were actually upset about omg p*rn! they'd be arguing against threads like Shaynus instead of old banners that they don't understand. Look at
>>52740 and see the bpd unleashed kek.
No. 52827
Please review the mod in the jvloggers thread. They continue to do nothing about derailing and baiting
>>>/w/280885 even when an anon
>>>/w/280985 admits they just want to discuss Lily because they want to see her bitter and make fun of her when she isn't a jvlogger and her life updates aren't relevant to the thread. While allowing this to go on, the mod then shows up to only redtext another anon
>>>/w/281008 for trying to explain why Lily was off topic and fixating on her is creepy. Minimoding is against the rules, but
>>>/w/280885 was the first to break rules by trying to derail and instigate another fight about a non-jvlogger, when Lily wasn't even being discussed. This always happens when anons are talking about something related to Chris or Sharla. This isn't the first time the mod will not warn or ban the op who broke rules in defense of Sharla or Chris, but will redtext and/or ban anons who provide evidence or explanation proving why the op was wrong or off topic.
>>>/meta/52594 No. 52828
>>52827How are anons not getting the hint that mods don't care about Lily. She was barely mentioned and it's derailed the way it has. Just ignore posts you don't have an interest in. It's not complicated. If you don't have to join in a certain cow discussion in the thread they belong in then just talk around it. You don't have to reply to every post. Talk about Norm or something while other anons discuss things like Reddit or Lily or whatever else they want like TokyoSam.
Also assuming mods are fans of the cows is asinine.
No. 52836
>>52834Anons should just scroll past if anons keep asking for proof about the same stuff over and over and it's been said over and over. You aren't going to change someone's opinion. If they are falling for these types of posts and getting banned, that's their own fault. I have no remorse for anons who can't handle how they personally post and if that's the case, they deserve all the bans they get for derailing, but then blaming other anons for their posts as if they were forced to press
New Reply. True Trumpian thinking.
No. 52858
>>52855Nona that would be a godsend, I'll try and compile what I can but it won't be for like 12+ hours. I'll dump what I find in the MTF threads or somewhere else (retarded shitposting maybe? feels like tainting the sacred Shitpost Cathedral for this post-death-twink genderspecial is sacrilegious) any and all guidance for this venture would be appreciated.
UNLESS
don't leave it in my hands I will fuck it up but I'll start compiling now No. 52863
>>52856This isn't a mod fault. Its anons fault. Mods have said nothing in 6+ months of your guys complaining about Lily that we can't discuss Lily. Anons need to stop minimodding and of Lily gets brought up, ignore it. Its not ruining your day and clearly theres a handful of anons who like keeping tabs on her which is what is supposed to happen. Someone posted an ex-Jvlogger who doesn't even vlog anymore or live in Japan and about how she bought bowls and thats not milky or a new vlog and she'snot coming back to Japan. There is a massive disconnect between the people who say Lily cannot be talked about but then completely off topic people who don't even live in Japan are allowed to be discussed all becausethey too used to vlog the same way, shocker, Lily used to vlog and try to use Chris to launch her channel. Irrelevancy is subject to discretion and Lily's on the table for discussion because she's relevant to some people. I don't know who the girl with bowls is but I don't care about her. This thread isn't just for 3 people. And there's more than 3 people who are also in that thread having discussions. If you don't like something being talked about you need to just scroll on or other people need to scroll on. This is why you guys keep getting banned. It's not a mod issue, its retarded gatekeeping anons who keep derailing to infight and post rules so we have to keep making them at a ridiculous rate. This entire new thread is just old milk being repeated,
again. This wouldn't happen if anons would just move on and stop complaining. It's always going to be
mods fault. It has been since this summer when anons were rightfully getting banned hard. I hope thats starts again because these minimodding complaints about Lily has gone on way longer than it should. The person who made the new thread didn't even remove Lily from the OP. Going to just repeatedly report discussion complaints as minimodding now, but do what you want and good luck blaming the mods of posters can't post properly.
No. 52864
>>52858sure let's do it together in the shitposting thread
I may have bought myself a little free time so let's put our stuff there whenever we can
No. 52871
>>52840NTA, but I'm not going to read any of that. I stopped at
>cyberstalkingDo you know where you are?
No. 52879
>>52859I disagree, the jannie is retarded to the core. Completely random application of the much vaunted ~rules~, minimodding only applies if someone is critical of a few pet cows. It never applies to the WKs and others who try to dictate what can and can't be discussed in a thread. Nitpicking only applies to certain cows, but nitpicks are allowed for others. It's transparently obvious to anyone who isn't in agreement with that mod that they have favorites. I've been banned for tinfoiling on /meta/, one of the only non-troon redtexts i've ever even seen on /meta/, for suggesting that the mod of /w/ is a lovesick moid for some of the weeb girls there, which tbh, seemed odd to me at the time. Anyway, long story short, /w/ sucks, many anons agree. It would be great if the new cerbmins took a moment to just glance over the /w/ mods' history. Maybe we're all the stupid ones and she's the only mod who actually applies the rules correctly but it'd be nice to have some clarity. Because as it is, posting on /w/ feels like a completely different ruleset than /snow/ and /pt/.
No. 52885
>>52879>stop banning me!!>im not the problem, its the mods!!Sure, Jan lol
>>52875I saw someone fix their "smh" in Venus's thread yesterday. I'mnot assuming it's certain anons. Imagine trying to use grammar to find out who is who. Braindead on an anon board.
No. 52888
>>52885There really isn't enough people using certain threads to hide obvious tells.
>>52887She's clearly just used to getting her way.
No. 52896
File: 1676158680816.png (81.53 KB, 1202x369, Screen Shot 2023-02-11 at 6.33…)
I am very interested in whether or not this unsaged post about how poor Aki is unfairly criticized for her looks gets a redtext. After all, this one about Ironmouse did. It would be a good example of the alleged uneven moderation of /w/ if it didn't.
No. 52897
File: 1676158756481.png (105.26 KB, 1791x321, Screen Shot 2023-02-11 at 6.36…)
>>52896samefag, the post about Ironmouse that got a redtext. I don't disagree about this btw, but whiteknighting is one of the 'rules' that nonas say isn't accurately applied in /w/ so, curious to see what happens here
No. 52898
>>52897there are better examples than this comparison because Ironmouse anon had to blog about her diagnoses on top of defending the cow. Cringe and pathetic.
But I also think moderation is insanely unbiased. There's so much shit in Yumi's thread that I've reported as misogyny and scrote behavior - no bans with red text. In Taylor's thread, a WK gets away with saying anons are into scat porn (for mildly criticizing Tom acting like a baby over a dirty diaper) and that women "wear diapers most of their lives" - no red texts. But disagreeing with the unhinged WK gets redtexted. Or posting a collage for any reason.
No. 52903
>>52902Report it and anons call cows whatever they like all the time, /w/ is full of nicknames too for them.
>inb4 but whore isn't a nicknameSounds like obvious bait anons can't handle replying to. That's not breaking any rules either. Different takes really rustle some panties. There are plenty of female anons who call cows really shitty things. You don't have to be a scrote to do that.
No. 52904
>>52903you obviously don't read her thread so maybe just cease bleating for awhile. No, we don't tend to call single mothers escaping
abusive relationships "whores" with an unnecessary race reference.
No. 52905
>>52904I've seen so many anons say she cheated/might've cheated which sounds like calling her a whore as an insult is right up there with exactly how /w/ anons act towards cows. Anons call Venus, the gyuaru girls, and most of the costhots whores. Put on some tougher pants, anon, or you're going to hate it here. This isn't a hugbox for cows. If anons want to call them whores, anything besides wishing harm, it's not against the rules and since they already have threads its not a vendetta either.
Keep trying to report though, but just letting you know mods probably don't care what names anons call a cows.
No. 52908
File: 1676188604862.jpg (26.08 KB, 697x142, dasSWQW.jpg)
there's again some 15-year-old retards in the finn thread get rid of them please
No. 52910
>>52907>ignoring board culture>ignoring that we had several raids over the past months>ignoring the months where moid accusations were flying everywhere >ignoring that Scott has a group of rabid supporters who type like underage teens and throw around misogynistic racist insultsThere is a "we" when it comes to basic board culture. Cheating once doesn't make anyone a whore, and I report every comment like that about a cow.
>>52905no, they don't call everyone whores, WTF
No. 52911
>>52872right? came here to see what nonnies had on Dylan and jfc the infighting
relax nonas we are all on the same team at the end of the day, unclench
>>52858is me, haven't done shit yet (busy wild day) will compile what I can tonight and tomorrow
in honour of kikomi and nonas and any other wayward female soul. I want to get his thread to the top result on google so at least some handmaiden can get peaked. I will work hard for the cause.
No. 52912
>>52911I'm that nonna working with you
I got some data from the KF thread and I'm writing some bullet points for the OP. I think we can just get it started and then also flesh out more, we don't need to recap all the individual videos as much as I kind of want to pick them all apart. We can do it in the thread, no reason not to revisit the rancid beginnings if needed
No. 52918
File: 1676211613834.jpg (70.1 KB, 750x762, es.jpg)
>>52916>>52917and hey mods while you're at it, could you also ban the underage retards who've been baiting the thread all weekend? I've reported them like 100 times already.
No. 52937
>>52873No, this is about a specific group of anons who repeatedly derail the jvlogger thread to share and complain about the boring life updates of the ex-girlfriend (Lily) of a jvlogger cow (Chris of AbroadinJapan). Lily is neither a youtuber nor public figure, and her relationship with Chris ended several years ago, so her selfies and work tweets are irrelevant to the thread. These same spergs have tried to argue that her random updates are more relevant to the thread than news that Chris had met with a sex predator vlogger he’d been warned about multiple times, and only seem to bring up Lily when discussion of Chris or his current girlfriend (another jvlogging cow, SharlainJapan) isn’t complimentary. One anon openly admitted they want the random Lily updates to continue because they just want to see her bitter and mock her. It goes without saying, but these spergs are obviously WKs of the jvlogger couple.
Recently, the thread referenced an entirely different ex of Chris', when talking about the women he invited on one of his vlogging series, which a sperg mistakenly assumed was about Lily, and tried to derail the thread and encourage infighting about her again. The mod did nothing for the nth time. The spergs then insisted that Chris absolutely did not cheat on Lily. Chris was caught lying about the timeline of his relationship with Sharla in his own vlog and editing out the lie immediately after it was discovered by our thread, so obviously everyone else finds it odd that these spergs say he did not cheat as a fact when there’s no way of knowing and good reason to at least be suspicious. While infighting has gone on due to the derail, the mod only intervened to chastise someone for explaining why such Lily posts aren’t relevant to jvloggers and what rules they break, which can be a form of minimoding, except the Lily spergs had already broken multiple rules and have a history of minimoding themselves that the mods strangely continue to allow.
Curiously, one Lily sperg in the thread and meta has repeatedly bragged about how Lily discussion has been permitted and others get retexted, and a WK in other /w/ threads has also implied they had an in with a mod.
>>>/meta/52585 A mod was also discovered posing as a farmer not that long ago and the jvlogger mod has a history of being defensive when it comes to Sharla. It’s time for admin to look into their mods and consider replacing them if they're showing a bias for certain cows and allowing WKs to break rules.
(inb4 they complain here, a Lily sperg will often call other people "autistic" or say "no1currs" if you bring up these problems here and in the jvloggers thread, and I've noticed a WK always says the exact same thing in the Taylor thread if they don't like what you imply about Taylor.)
No. 52939
>>52937I agree with everything you've said and encourage the admin to figure out what is going on in /w/.
I was the one who got a ban for a saged post where I combined photos. Someone else asked why in /meta (I did not and have never ban evaded.) Note that no reason for the ban was given in red text:
>>43420Here is the snarky reply from a certain anon:
>>43427After my ban expired I posted the ban message ("nitpick collage"):
>>43446 and
>>43448 (new thread)
this basically confirms that the anon who called it nitpicking and "collages as usual" either is the w/ janny or has an in with that mod. There's no way anyone else saw that saged collage as nitpicking, nor are collages prohibited (I fondly remember our Aly collages).
Many anons shared stories of having posts critical of the w/ mod marked with "troon":
>>43432>>43435and more ofc, including some post I made later (criticism after cancergate).
No. 52943
>>52937well put anon. /w/ is really getting ridiculous, I hope the new admins are more interested in the state of that board than shaymin ever was. It's completely arbitrary which cows you can nitpick, and which you can't. Lori's thread is basically 95% nitpicks about her appearance and nobody gets redtexted over it, nor does a repetitive WK ever even post in that thread, let alone jump to poor loony's defense. Meanwhile Ahri, the jvloggers, Taylor, Belle when it is godforsakenly active, and Aki get strong defensive posts anytime someone has the audacity to say they look fat, or ugly, or stupid. And even redtexts for dumb shit like what happened to
>>52939. Collages in and of themselves are
obviously not against the rules, it is some poster (and
some mod's) hangup alone. No one else gives a shit about them. No other board has this many people complaining about specific moderation decisions - please cerbmin, take a look.
No. 52949
File: 1676263705256.jpg (451.9 KB, 1920x1920, InShot_20230212_204727572.jpg)
>>52943>They even defend taylor too waaah>the posts in that threadAs if these don't warrent bans. This is the quality you guys are defending. Absolutely not. The mods are 100%
valid. Seethe more. There was an anon was even defending the spoonie. Ew.
No. 52956
File: 1676264354789.jpg (535.19 KB, 1080x2001, Screenshot_20230212_205544_Chr…)
>>52949Samefag, but this is seriously what the complaining is about. How are these bad bans? The anons in the threads too act like this quality isn't shit. Mods agree, its shit. Every ban on /w/ makes sense. This isn't a free-for-all where anons get to shitpost. Quality matters. The pic that won't load was just a collage of porn just out of vendetta. Also the bumping
is totally annoying.
No. 52970
File: 1676310990748.jpg (381.09 KB, 1920x1920, Forcing infights.jpg)
Love when threads are bumped just to infight and trying to get other anons to hi cow posters they don't agree with under the assumption a cow is a posting. That's one way to derail by getting anons to constantly hi cow posters.
>>52966Anon is claiming a mod is baiting farmers then banning them based on descriptions on the callout posts . That doesn't even make sense.
No. 52979
>>52947She was involved with him about 4 or so years ago. Her selfies showing off new outfits and tweets about her job and cooking have nothing to do with him. I suppose we should be allowed to post all of Chris' sister's selfies and other sns updates then. At least she's still related to him whereas Lily hasn't been in Chris' life for years now. All of the social media updates of Chris' acquaintances, even if they aren't about Chris and the people aren't vloggers themselves, must be fair game, too, right?
>>52956>The anons in the threads too act like this quality isn't shit. Mods agree, its shit. They've allowed vendetta posting in the jvlogger thread of someone who isn't even a cow for a year now.
No. 53014
>>52937What happened in that thread is a bunch of people came over from Chris's subreddit and probably other places around the time the dating discussion started back in 2021.
A screenshot showing that lolcow was mentioned in his subreddit was posted months ago. They stayed because they weren't allowed to discuss dating in the subreddit.
They came here to treat the thread like a fan page and fawn over their favourite jvloggers and shit on anyone who wrongs them in any way.
And there's the double standards
>>>/w/277594 >>>/w/277635Then anons brought up Sharla's old milk showing her history of being a cunt.
They got upset about Sharla looking far worse than Lily so now they say her old milk is "exaggerated and fake facts". They can't have the wicked witch ex gf Lily and the sweet wholesome new gf Sharla dynamic anymore.
It's also why they're upset about the b&b stuff as now they both look worse than her.
No. 53021
>>53016Note how I said "and probably other places". I've never said anything about a mod being a farmer. I'm not this anon
>>52937 kek.
How is "there are some redditor fans in the thread" a retarded conspiracy when this site was mentioned on his subreddit?
No. 53028
File: 1676456342656.jpg (1.79 MB, 1002x7084, Bans×tamps.jpg)
Well anons… after weeks/months(?) of posting without any problems and after getting a bunch of content converted to post in a certain /snow/ thread, I posted
>>52939 and went to sleep for 4 hours. I woke up to a 2-day ban and a psycho sperging in /meta/. Why did I get banned? For "spoonfeeding," an offense I did not commit and which is not listed at all in the rules.
Ban #1 - for asking approximately when Sharla allegedly posted on PULL. There was an argument about whether this ever happened and I thought it would help settle it to check the archive, which is not searchable and very slow. No good deed goes unpunished.
Ban #2 - sperganon claims there is a group of angry anons who are "mad when Taylor isn't blamed for infertility." Other anons and I know that this pure bullshit. I do not need to lurk more to know that is a lie. Asking for proof of a claim is not spoonfeeding. Ctrl-F? Tell me, women of /meta/, what should I search to find these non-existent angry anons? "Taylor"? "Infertility"? honestly.
Finally, I include the timestamps of someone flipping out in this thread around the same time I got a ban. I've written the admins about the issue (if admin @ lolcow.farm still works), but the rest of you should know that the mod of /w/ will ban you for trying to help prove something OR for asking for proof, and someone close to that mod will lose their shit here in an attempt to make your posts look bad. If you post here, critical of the /w/ mod, anything you post in /w/ will be used to give you a ban. I don't care anymore what happens to my ability to post, but be aware this situation is ongoing and could happen to you. Draw your own conclusions.
No. 53033
>>53028These bans were redtexted on Sunday evening/Monday, given the complaints were 2 days ago. Mods aren't usually as active over the weekends I've noticed. They deserve time off tbh. There's not really a way to prove you didn't post these if the reports are coming back as you posting them though. There's so little error to confuse posters tbh. It's happened, but the rate at which all these constantly banned /w/ posters act like it is, just sounds like being mad you got caught. I also reported the Taylor thing as spoonfeeding. Don't care about the
spoonie discourse, but the post wanted anons to do their work for them and should lurk themselves, sorry, yourself. You could show part of you IP to the thread and if the reports on the IPs are different, but both are yours, then maybe don't do that. Also begging for info in Jvlog and Taylor then getting mad you got bans for it is hilarious.
No. 53036
>>53034Anon should share part of their IP from both posts. That would help too because a mod wouldn't ban the same IP twice, but both posts were asking to be spoonfed which is technically against the rules.
I'm not sure what their complaint is exactly. Someone came to /meta/ to complain and mods dealt with it. Anon just doesn't want to admit their bans were justified.
No. 53038
>>53036Why do I need to share my IP? it'a exactly the same on both. How were either of these justified? I cannot ctrl-f for posts that don't exist.
I sent both ban screenshots to admin @ lolcow.farm so admin can speak up if I'm lying.
No. 53045
>>53043who tf are you asking? Ask the /w/ mod who did the bans. How would the original anon have access to the ban text for two different bans if they weren't both
her bans? Obviously screenshots being shared or something I guess, but to what end? It's not hard to believe that the /w/ mod, one who has received a lot of criticism on /meta/, banned somebody twice for whatever reason.
No. 53046
File: 1676481924555.png (73.9 KB, 880x706, rules_did_exist.png)
>>53042Just going to leave this here.
https://lolcow.farm/infoRemember
No. 53047
File: 1676481975563.jpg (41.3 KB, 1080x149, Screenshot_20230215_092542_Chr…)
>>53046Mods say to check info, not rules, constantly, but anons refuse to listen.
No. 53050
>>53046so people can straight-up lie, and if you ask for proof, they can rell you to ctrl-f, and when you say again, "this is not true, show me an instance where it is true," you cop a ban?
clown world on lolcow.
No. 53053
>>53046neither of the things I asked about had been listed in the OP or in recent posts. So this isn't spoonfeeding. And whatever you screenshot there has nothing to do with the current situation.
Also please find where it says that if posting more than one photo in a row, only the first should be unsaged. You know, like that ban someone got in Sky's thread.
No. 53061
File: 1676482963784.png (13.19 KB, 400x97, Screen Shot 2023-02-15 at 12.4…)
>>53058I agree it all needs to be discussed, but this anon
>>53055 loves to just take one point you're making and harp on it over and over instead of addressing everything in a post. Also weird post just a second ago inferring that perhaps the mod is the one responding. crazy times.
No. 53085
>>53084You implied it. I agree its annoying in the thread and less annoying here, but its been said a million times and the farmhands clearly dont care. Not just about that but the entire thread hence the weirdo posting in all caps about cumming unsaged and last I checked the posts are still there.
I understand you frustration, anon, I do. It sucks because that thread was so good (ignoring the infighting that popped up) until the psychos showed up.
No. 53088
>>53086Theres multiple conversations that happen in /meta/, many useless just like the one I'm having along with your comment. kek.
>>53087It makes me pretty sad, tbh. It was one of the few I actually still liked to check up on.
No. 53092
File: 1676536640970.gif (1.45 MB, 194x275, 1671741259548.gif)
>>53077That's not very kawiwi of you, anon. CC welcomes all farmers.
No. 53097
>>53077Let anons from here go to CC. Everyone knows most anons in CC are trannies so even the most
toxic anon here would be an upgrade from them.
No. 53117
File: 1676591954464.jpg (281.88 KB, 1080x1000, Screenshot_20230216_155838_Chr…)
Wow so milky, great posts
No. 53120
File: 1676592311534.jpg (74.24 KB, 1080x269, Skyanonretard.jpg)
>>53117Also giving anons nicknames kek what stupid shit is this, who the fuck is sky-anon? Really weak infighting bait, these same posters complain they get banned when they post non-milk and think saging saves them from useless social media posts kek They got so mad that I pointed out the obvious vendetta
No. 53134
>>53099Have you been in that thread?
The only reason people want to merge the jake/kat/kaya thread back to alt cows is because alt cows is dead and the jake etc thread has pretty consistent milk because jake is the biggest alt cow on lol cow. It’d be the only way to revive altcows. You’re dumb.
No. 53136
>>53134What is the milk, then? Jake is doing nothing other than producing the occasional stupid comment/tweet.
Also, are you the spacing retard that haunts that thread? It's been long enough, you can integrate already.
No. 53137
>>53120>>53117So if you're reeeing about those posts, posts like this one
>>>/w/282121 are even less relevant and retarded
No. 53140
File: 1676643697100.jpg (35.05 KB, 436x436, FZv04b5XEAU3mw-.jpg)
>>53139It's so retarded on so many ways. I've got two guesses as to what's going on, leaving this avatarfagging up to see which guess is correct.
No. 53152
File: 1676654035476.png (415.46 KB, 604x430, Screenshot_20230217-181224.png)
>>53143saged post = not milk. What's so hard to understand? The info and rules of the site allow posts that are not "milk," per se. This applies to the Sky thread too.
No. 53153
File: 1676654445327.png (2.42 MB, 2000x2500, F3CA329A-71CE-43F8-BFE3-5B01E1…)
>>51603>>53146I also saw it, cp in /snow/ and /m/, reported
No. 53155
>>53152Learned to use /info lol after mods redtexted it. Congratulations.
>>53151A few anons agreed upthread that its been a pattern.
No. 53160
>>53158Every rule is basically applied on a case by case basis nona, no one thinks an AI is moderating the boards. But what is nakedly obvious is that the /w/ mod lets absolutely worthless infighting bitchery (repetitive comments like “not milk” all the time filling up threads, instead of reporting) and random compliments fill up threads and then redtexts nonas who are not complimentary to Taylor, Himeahri, Belle, whoever theyre currently simping for. Obviously no one expects rules to be 100% enforced the same at all times across all threads, but the /w/ mod is incredibly biased to the point that many anons in /meta/ have pointed it out. And please, if you are an expert on rules, show me where it says
anything about collages.
No. 53162
>>53160Simpanon even admitted once that taylor's face is botched and then blamed farmers for it:
>>>/w/278290 So it's hopeless arguing with such a shill. Fuck I had a jumpscare looking at that cap above.
Same person loses their shit over any criticism of how ahri or belle looks, so def not limited to taylor. But shit, they go hard for tay and sharla. Like those are the true sacred cows on /w/.
No. 53164
>>53161This
>>>/meta/43420 was not a repost, not a shitpost, not edited. Try again!
No. 53170
File: 1676660608495.png (607.39 KB, 864x1565, Screenshot_20230217-200226.png)
>>53168what is nitpicking about it? Or about this one in the Belle thread, which you replied to with "based mod" or something? Go ahead and explain.
No. 53171
i would suggest you guys ignore
>>53161. this person for whatever reason has been parked in /meta/ threads getting a laugh off of any and every criticism that anons point out about moderation, board culture, etc. i bet $1 they are the same anon that was on cc attacking people over the banners and being an ass on here when they got caught out for being weird. this person is very strange and is likely only here to cause drama and tear the community apart.
No. 53173
>>53171I think you're right, and I also think they're the same person who said "spoonie" in reference to someone being 'spoonfed', then acted really cool and aloof about being called out kek. I think it's blatantly obvious that they're not a farmer in the sense that they're here to make fun of
any cows. I think they're here to defend certain cows/a moderator's decisions with regards to those cows. for what purpose I'll leave up to others to tinfoil.
No. 53176
>>53170Nitpicking what app she's using/photoshop, check.
Collage, check. (Probably the anon who did it before)
Infighting which mods didn't flag
Yep.
No. 53205
File: 1676762029566.jpg (292.76 KB, 1080x956, Screenshot_20230218_151159_Chr…)
Thank fucking God. These Sky retards get mad when banned, but still can't learn to post worth shit. Vendetta-fags need to go outside. Not everything a cow posts is milk.
Mods, you're doing awesome.
No. 53209
>>53208farmhand in /w/ either wants to be the cows or fuck them
I thought we were anti-bestiality
No. 53251
>>53198not what I meant, I mean female-specific and to break down their reasons. ty though nona!
I made the thread, it's in you and the farmhands-hands (kek) now
No. 53256
There's an anon in /w/ who's trying to infight over little things in the Jvloggers thread. It's getting kind of weird
>>>/w/282558 They seem really sensitive for some reason over saying someone's Japanese is good because it's a compliment in their opinion and thus equals white-knighting [most likely but they haven't said that yet, but given how those threads look, probably assuming it]. I reported it for infighting too if that helps.
No. 53269
>>53256You're mad and want people banned because they rightly pointed out that Sharla isn't fluent in Japanese? I think the
nonnie who's minimoding anyone who says anything that isn't positive about Sharla is the one being "really sensitive" here.
No. 53273
>>53270The WK is the one who randomly brought up Sharla's fluency and now they're trying to get people banned for calling them out.
>>53271Those WKs should have been banned long ago for repeatedly lying about Sharla having cancer to garner sympathy for her. Just another example of the modding being inconsistent and biased.
No. 53275
>>53273I am not the one who brought up her being good at Japanese, but I am the one who used Paolo as an
example. Please stop assuming all anons posts you don't like are all the same anon. It's getting really old.
No. 53277
>>53274Where did you get the idea that none of us anons are proficient at Japanese? We already discussed the problems with Sharla's Japanese back during her airbnb vlog, and provided concrete examples proving why she isn't any near fluent. Just because you don't speak Japanese, doesn't mean the rest of us don't. We weren't the ones who brought up any of this and we aren't the ones in meta trying to get people banned for correctly pointing out that Sharla isn't fluent and her fluency wasn't relevant to the initial discussion about the move to Tokyo.
>>53275Work on your reading comprehension yourself. I was referring to the initial anon who brought up Sharla's proficiency and called her fluent. You're replying to the wrong person.
No. 53278
>>53275>>53276The mention of Paolo out of nowhere is suspicious because the same thing got brought up last year, when people wanted to discuss Tom and Taylor's communication. It stuck in my mind because Paolo is literally never discussed in Taylor's thread but some WK defending Tom/Taylor says, "go tell Paolo to learn better Japanese, then!" as if that were relevant at all to the discussion. And so there is an anon who throws in Paolo whenever a favorite cow's language abilities are being criticized. Weird.
>>>/w/196393>>>/w/196489I'd put it in the jvlogger thread but /w/ mod would ban me merely for having a good memory.
No. 53280
>>53278I wouldn't risk saying it in the thread, but bringing up Paolo like that really did smack of a funny kind of jealousy. If not from the cow themselves, which would be just too obvious, then from a
huge fan. It was like, "but why do you guys like Paolo! He can't even speak any Japanese!" same with the other mentions about his repetitive day in the life videos versus Chris, et cetera. Some random pitting of Paolo against other jvloggers as if we all need to be convinced that ackshully he sucks, and Sharla (and apparently Taylor kek) is the good one. So stupid.
No. 53281
>>53278Good point. Any mention of Paolo in Taylor's thread is very random and strange.
>>53280Not that I think it's Chris, but I seem to recall Chris making an indirect quip about Paolo's videos a while ago saying something he'd never make those types of videos as if it's beneath him. I think it was in comments and at least a year ago. I'm almost certain in was mentioned in the jvloggers thread. I think some WKs are also salty because Paolo has more subscribers and already reached 3+ million since there's been an uptick in random comments about him in jvloggers since it was mentioned.
No. 53289
>>53288I got a 3y ban on my mobile ip for this (and was called a tranny). that was in the wake of the /ot/ redtexts (cancerchan and cat hate samefagging). I just brought up issues with /w/ in addition to those incidents and got the ban.
no clue if it was reversed bc of new admins or if i got assigned a new ip… i did appeal it but never got a response
No. 53304
>>53297it wasn't infighting and you didn't read my post. It was criticism of /w/ moderation.
no one has posted anywhere about /w/ theories so calm down. But an anonymous site doesn't mean posts are all the same, without identifying information. as you know.
No. 53317
>>53302I understand raising the spectre of PULL is supposed to make anyone who disagrees with you sound like a loser from the dead drama forum. But it isnt the case, I for one never posted on PULL and I think /w/ sucks because of bad moderation festering a WK pissypants culture. And why tf would anyone need to make a discord to discuss what is happening on an anonymous imageboard?
this is where the discussion should be, on the complaints thread, not on some offsite bullshit never to be seen again.
No. 53319
>>53317>bad moderation festering a WK pissypants culture.If there's going to be a hellweek like the cerbmin says then /w/ needs too be struck hard and monitored so that anons that blogpost, don't sage nonmilk post, blatantly bait, derail and obvious newfags and WK needs to be
permabanned
No. 53332
>>53329Wash your panties, you're so needless aggro over this and complaints thread isn't for tinfoiling, so yeah, a discord or going to
>>53286 seems like the option, but fyi, that thread has a lot of posts making fun of the Belle edit-chans, Sky ones, Taylor ones, even Jill ones. For the most part, the nitpicking anons who keep complaining are laughed at in old months post lol
No. 53349
>>53347not even the OP of the thread, just some random update
>>53345>pantiestalk like an adult human female or leave
No. 53389
>>53388he's not posting any dumb male things and is politely answering questions. it's milk fresh from the source that no one else can provide. no other site is going to care about this stuff so it's here or nowhere
the thread is 8 years old. farmers have been wanting answers for a long time but have been stuck speculating on youtube thumbnails for years
banning him just for being male means the mods prioritize having a female only board over a board where milk can be shared. this is lolcow not crystal cafe. what even is the point then
No. 53392
>>53390he can't verify himself as her ex boyfriend AND not announce he is male. if he didn't verify, no one would believe him
jesus the r*tardation
(r*tardation) No. 53395
>>53393the person that made the site was male
rigidly sticking to rules to the detriment of the site is so stupid and makes it sound like the mods have zero critical thinking skills or are extreme autists that prioritize rules over milk
having a general guideline and then deciding on exceptional situations on a case by case basis makes much more sense. you can't know all the possible situations when you make the rules. you end up with situations like this where you insist on strictly following the rules that didn't even consider situations like this when they were written
No. 53403
File: 1677016732216.jpg (267.52 KB, 1080x1548, Screenshot_20230222-085609__01…)
>>53390>>53393Then how would anyone have even listened to what he had to say kek? You can revoke your anonymity if it's relevant. This is a place for milk first and foremost regardless of the source.
No. 53409
>>53405kek
nonny its pointing out why that person get the ban, because of that.
No. 53424
>>53422Not Blaine.
Not your site or you'd be better at spotting him.
>>53421Keep crying, Rachel.
>>53423You're not me. I dont think.
No. 53483
>>53479The one you just replied to is the CP spammer, she freaks out and calls anyone Blaine. Soon as she gets heated enough she will spam CP and post in /meta/ instantly.
I'm not dumb, it's a clear set up and jannies can see device ID so when cerbim said it's not them, maybe listen.
No. 53485
>>53483Samefagging to say she wandered into the Rachel thread too,there is a whole thread about this stuff with the admins weighing in. All of this is pointless because the ones shouting Blaine or Tranny the loudest are all cows, actual lolcows trying to get their threads down.
It's very simple and take it straight from the admins mouth themselves, it doesn't help anything
>>>/meta/51666 and most of the time it's clearly a bot.
No. 53502
>>53501That Tif needs to not take the bait or act retarded. Her whole meltdown on the lolcow.farm KF thread was embarrassing and could have been avoided. Cows stop being cows when
they stop being cows. From her kf thread or the LC thread on kf orsomething (I just took a quick glance) it seems like she spoke to Blaine for a while. People need to stop interacting with terminally online tranny /moid /freaks whatever bc they have no lives and will just dedicate all their time to weird shit
No. 53504
>>53502She only talked to him for 3(?) days before blocking him upon realizing he was being manipulative then started sperging hard about her lmfao
She's a dumb, fat pig with the social awareness of a doormat
No. 53508
File: 1677208491536.jpeg (18.28 KB, 473x354, 2ff6f5c218c2a365aa0ae572125262…)
cp in /snow/ bumping off front page
No. 53518
>>53517It only makes sense when you realize it's their only chance to talk with men because they don't go outside and are shunned from most online communities, the pettiest, weakest, most narcissistic flock to /ot/ going
>Why can't we bully, the cow boards do it.Completely missing the point and showing clearly that nobody is lurking before posting there. They have no lives and sit there hunting down wrongthink, it's insane.
No. 53521
>>53519I'm saying anyone who's interacting with the scrote never touches grass then bemoaning any post there that's not meeting with the neet lifestyle is met with anger on non-cow boards.
Like they wouldn't interact with him if they were outside enough but they work themselves up about men all day so when one comes in they swarm to get out their emotions on him.
No. 53533
File: 1677273166038.gif (2.71 MB, 498x498, thank you.gif)
thank you so much for the redtext in /2x/
No. 53534
File: 1677276009595.png (64.3 KB, 1233x281, Screenshot 2023-02-24 at 4.57.…)
So much obvious moidposting in the Aellagirl thread on /snow/
No. 53542
Back to editing photos by messing with subtleties like saturations
>>>/w/283544 The original was already posted
>>>/w/283245 No. 53544
>>53543Thanks for the warning
nonny and thanks for the non-link (?) bc I want to report threads or posts and if staff can’t find it I’d like to leave the link to the post but not want nonnys clicking by accident or something. Thanks for showing how to do it!
No. 53552
File: 1677380437379.png (7.73 KB, 704x176, Capture.PNG)
>>53550this was the ban, Is there somewhere where the new rule was announced?
No. 53563
File: 1677392779007.png (494.91 KB, 512x598, goodbye nonna.png)
i used AI as it should, this is both ai and my own art i made for the maybe? next lolcow graduation thread or anything!
No. 53564
>>53562cute
look at those sad cows!!
No. 53577
>>53575Go see how the topic evolved from the matter at hand
>>>/ot/1509793Admins! the anons want the husbando threads out of /g/ and back to /m/ where it always belonged.
No. 53591
>>53590its been going on for more than 24 hours and its very clearly one anon rewriting the same "weeellllasssshuallllyy we shouldn't call people anonymously a pedo as a joke just because they like ddlg and age regression and loli porn bc the ethics of my asshole bla bla"
she never stops!
No. 53596
File: 1677444997808.jpeg (972.12 KB, 1170x2014, 95884261-D470-4DB0-BF7B-51D25C…)
>>53594I stg that the redtext saying “you’re right” used to be on the post that now is just pasture’d. Did anyone else see that or am I wrong?
No. 53598
File: 1677445158029.png (127.78 KB, 1360x460, Screen Shot 2023-02-26 at 12.1…)
>>53596you are right nona. maybe the will make a post about it here later?
No. 53599
>>53597Samefag
And to be clear I agree that pedophile is thrown away way too fast but the poster completely loses me at implying there's "pretend pedophilia" it's not the same as playing a video game and that's clearly a huge jump.
No. 53600
>>53590>>53593>>53595We'd like to address this red text:
The farmhand in question had used that message in a red text further up thread and forgot to change the red text message when banning the post you are referencing.
We agree that red texts should not be opinionated like this in general, and we have spoken to the farmhand in question and her privileges have been temporarily reduced while she does some re-training.
To be clear: this red text does not represent the opinions of the moderation team, this was an honest and tired mistake by a farmhand who now knows better. Apologies for the confusion!
No. 53613
>>53586>Anons in /w/ do this all the time.You are also an anon in /w/, right?
>They think it's funny. Doubtful. Did you ask them? Have proof? Tinfoil!
>It's just the constant dealing, ban evading anons who probably got redtexts in places like the Venus and Belle thread and they are mad and testing their posting or just bumping to piss other anons off."Dealing", ban evading, ip hopping, redtexts, Belle, Sharla, Venus, Taylor, not milky, reeeeeeee
>We've been through this before.You can hide threads, nona.
No. 53622
File: 1677475478880.jpg (47.95 KB, 800x450, 7ckxtq.jpg)
>>53600thank you very much! i appreciate the transparency and clear communication. my apologies to the janny i accused of being a pedo apologist. with all that lot in the thread you can see why i was worried! bless.
No. 53627
tranny is sperging out, samefagging, and vendettaposting in
>>>/w/195091 after getting two of his socks banned from kiwifarms
No. 53631
File: 1677513582289.jpg (Spoiler Image,200.76 KB, 961x1281, disgusting male face.jpg)
>>53629NTA but:
A comprehensive long list of things the rapist pedo schizo troon says and does (feel free to add onto it):
>mask off>sweep/sweeping/swept>pedo ring/pedo jannies/jannies posting cp/admin is male/jannies are male (basically any raging hatred and accusations regarding site staff)>admin is being blackmailed >blend/blending >erika/uh >everyone is blaine/we're all blaine>pretends blaine and erika are different people >links to other imageboards and sketchy websites >shits on fire/sites fucked>talks about elaine/rachel/null(josh)/michael or other irrelevant kiwifags>you're going down >I will expose you>refers to himself using the wrong pronouns (calls himself she or they despite being male) >complaining about kuz and soyjak >coverup >something real is going on>this is insane/crazy/huge>gayops >random youtube song links and/or random lyric dumps >anime avatarfagging (usually with pedo anime characters, sometimes with final fantasy ones) >misuse of sites lingo >asking or demanding to be a mod/janny/admin>replying to one of his posts with the same lingo and typing style (samefagging)>posts cp and then is immediately around to complain about cp he posted >threatens to kill/rape people >asks to be unbanned >mentions his vpns>refers to himself as erika or UH>posts ugly pic of his thighs and covered bulge >spergs about porn and his creepy fetish stuff>tries to get people to post hand pics >larps as being a csa survivor >randomly talks about his sister >posts /pol/tier nazi and pepe pics >conspiracies about blackmailing, abuse, pedo rings >constantly mentions foxdickfarms >I proved it/here's the proof>you're killing this website/this website is dead bickers of you/this website is dying >pro tranny/pro scrote posts (trannies have always been welcome/men can post here if they want/etc) >schizobabble about being a witch/magic spells/hexes >says he is a tranny not a troon (and other weird tranny infighting stuff)>uses sexist insults (calls women whores, cunts, bitches, roasties, etc) >complaining about jews and nonwhites >refers to women as "natal women" or "cis women" >god complex spergouts >hates on radfems and gcs>says he is gnc >talks about his ugly troon dick >sniffed out >it was rigged/I rigged it >slapfight>I win/I won/I'm winning >mentions flamenco or undefault or naught >bbc spam >bought off janny/paid off janny>foxdickfarm >this is why people never use this site >whines about "transphobes" >says he is doing damage control >talks about owning guns and/or threatens to use them >weird obsession with russia >pretends he has some greater plan >randomly counts down (ie 6 days left, 6 hours left) >broom/broomstick>so much proof >look at these connections/all the connections >you're screwed/it's over >desperate >pressed/keeping you pressed>meltdown>I timed it/it was timed >pretends he's doing this to waste someones time >vendetta-chan>vpn-chanif you see posts that contain any of these it's the ban evading sweaty gamer tranny, do not reply to him, simply report and ignore
No. 53634
>>53632the denial and
>>53631 throws a wrench in that. now go dilate
No. 53635
When your proof is essentially this
>>53628 I can't take you seriously so I asked for bans to be issued before I make that thread.
No. 53653
>>53652So one could argue that after someone
thinks they exposed Blaine they post CP and blame him. Gotcha.
No. 53659
the schizotroon is threatening a cow with their dox, samefagging, threatening her and even dropping his troon name unprovoked in
>>>/w/195091he threatened to go after her family and is having a power trip by samefagging and deleting posts
No. 53660
File: 1677524663443.png (10.5 KB, 610x121, 7.png)
>>53659Rules. Doesn't look like they're following them to me.
No. 53663
File: 1677533438146.jpg (1.01 MB, 2341x1443, QXHd0pn.jpg)
What is this vile shit? A janny using the word "nona"? Who let newfags be in charge of moderating the website? LC is gone 4evar
>>>/pt/910351https://archive.ph/mdOOb No. 53664
Someone made a garbage thread in /Snow/ with a poorly censored inappropriate image and rules that make it very obvious that it's both a vendetta post and made by someone who doesn't want criticism for their shit thread and attitude
>>>/snow/1778636They didn't even get her online handles correct and wrote it like a Kiwi WIP
No. 53669
>>53663Nona/nonna/
nonny and all the other variations have not been newfag words for a couple of years now.
No. 53671
>>53664Same anon, thanks farmhands. The image being titled after song lyrics and unspoiled NSFW was uncomfortable considering the spam in the Vocaloid thread reeking of troon, making the thread rules hypocritical.
I will give the nonna a thumbs up for making harassing cow and her family against the rules, though
No. 53672
File: 1677538512020.jpg (399.02 KB, 2388x1164, 9V9UFKq.jpg)
>>53669Sorry, but anything post-2020 is newfag territory, even if it has been "a couple of years". If you've been on LC since 2016/2017 or earlier (hell, even 2018), you would have seen that the user base of the website had a massive metamorphosis during that 2019-2020 period of Twitterfags, Tiktards, and underaged stan spastics.
And nice to know that some faggot mod banned me for posting a complaint in the complaints thread
Definitely proving that you guys aren't absolute newfags KEK
No. 53673
>>53672I've been here since about 2017, there are still anons who are not newfags who use nonna/
nonny so it's not indicative of anything. And anyway if you've actually seen the userbase change then you would also know that there are bigger issues than anons using nicknames. Weird nitpick, anon
especially when that janny was banning a K-pop thread, which is actual newfag shit...
No. 53674
>>53673>I've been here since about 2017, there are still anons who are not newfags who use nonna/nonnyThat wasn't a thing in 2017, you should know that. That's why
nonny is redtexted.
>there are bigger issues than anons using nicknamesYes, because complaining about farmhands using "nona" implies that I denied the existence of other problems on the website.
Exhibit A is the janny doling out a ban for "derailment" when I posted a complaint in the complaints and suggestions thread on /meta/
>>53672>especially when that janny was banning a K-pop thread, which is actual newfag shit..I didn't say that banning the K-Pop retard was wrong, I said that using the word "nona" is newfag shit.
If you've been here since 2017, you'd know that <90% of the anons using some variation of
nonny are newfags. The whole
nonny trend didn't pick up until after 2020. What do you think happened in 2020 for that to occur?
The "nona" trend is not the issue; it's a symptom of the greater problem of LC's culture changing for the worse. People treat this place like it's a second Twitter when this is first and foremost an anonymous gossip image. If old-erfags aren't being more aggressive in forcing anons to integrate the right way, we'll continue to see the barrage of shitposts and sludge that contaminate every board. Spend two minutes on /snow/ and you'll see what I mean. Worse yet, we'll eventually come up upon "a couple of years" since this virulent newfaggotry originated, and those people from "a couple of years" ago are going to call themselves oldfags by then, some will apply to be farmhands, and those new farmhands will perpetuate the degeneration of board culture because they don't know any better.
And yeah, I know the website has changed culture a little bit over time since 2014, but it was never like this. When you've been on the internet for so long, it's kind of sad to see how homogenized it has gotten. Imageboards used to occupy their own little corner on the web, now I feel like I'm scrolling through another social media website
No. 53681
>>53680No, about nonna/nona/
nonny/
nonnie.
No. 53692
>>53685You said that anyone post-2020 is a newfag
>>53672 so I can't take you seriously with your definition of newfag. 3 years is a big amount of time. I think you're not just an ib oldfag you're literally old and middle aged. Cultures change. Adapt you boomer.
No. 53698
>>53692I didn't say anyone post-2020 is a newfag (even though I agree with that sentiment kek), I said
anything, which are two different words, zoomer-chan.
Newfaggotry proliferated in that period with the TikTok/Twitter infestation, and you can't deny that if you're a true oldfag
Re: what is a newfag You can be here long enough that you aren't a newfag, but that alone doesn't make you an oldfag either—that's based on
when you joined the community, not how long ago
>I think you're not just an ib oldfag you're literally old and middle aged. Cultures change. Adapt you boomer.This new generation has no respect for their elders. For shame!
>>53695Lurk moar newfag
The only thing that changed is that we have <3 farmhands for the entire website, which isn't normal
If we had hellweeks still I could guarantee you that the cowboards would not be so oversaturated with unsaged non-milk posts
No. 53699
File: 1677551356103.jpg (178.97 KB, 847x434, Screenshot_20230227_192824_Chr…)
someone's doxing a cow in /snow/ when the cow herself never revealed her street address
No. 53703
>>53702Oh wait disregard that the cow just
used it like one my bad, would you like me to remind the poster to delete it instead of report flagging?
No. 53719
>>53717No she forgot to blot that out on the
other picture of her ID she uploaded. It's wild.
No. 53738
>>53737Then I have absolutely no complaints because that OP was
extremely professional and charitable. I do hope the scrotes go elsewhere, this cows going to get fucked with hard thanks to all the white knighting.
>Omg a threatNo it's called I know what's going to happen because I'm not retarded like the WKs and the cow.
No. 53743
Someone posted a cow's address
>>>/snow/1779197If this is a faildox, that's actually hilarious but I hope the person who lives there is okay.
No. 53745
>>53743It's not a faildox white knight, go eat paste in your corner, I already directed where to go for the scrote as banning will only make him worse.
Use your brain, how long have you been at this? You're pathetic.
No. 53747
>>53746You clearly haven't. Also I'm not here to argue with you, the cow was terrified of him calling his mother so it's not a faildox.
Again, how long have you been farming funnies? You clearly are a newfag at this, sit down.
No. 53760
>>53758If anons could they'd use reflections in the eyes of cows to figure out where they live too. There is absolutely no reasoning behind trying to use a cow's background as justification to post their address. How is this even an arguing point? I'm saying this in general, not even just only about these two cows. Anons tried this in /w/ with several half a year ago. It's absolutely unhinged to try to piece together where they might live, posting possible listings and surrounding areas, all because a cow didn't even post their address, but because anons think the windowsill matches and now here's an entire
maybe address they could live at.
No. 53761
>>53760I agree with your point I just think the second post was a bad example as by itself it appears like a warning. I'm not a fan of cowtipping unless the law obviously needs to be involved or the cows in a life threatening situation so that includes dropping dox.
I agree that a big issue in this is random people being harassed.
No. 53765
>>51603lolcow.farm/m/res/279190.html#q279190
weird jailbait / cp / porn image in /m/
No. 53768
>>53765//lolcow.farm/snow/res/1779303.html#q1779303
another one in /snow/
No. 53777
>>53775Seriously, I think WG definitely deserves a thread. I do not think her A-Logs make sense compared to what she has done. Read: being an edgelord TIF who's ego and whimsy outweigh her gut tenfold. That doesn't deserve doxing, threats, spam, et cetera.
Maybe she's a personal cow he's upset isn't personal anymore.
No. 53784
>>53782The whole conversation has been leaked in numerous places? Oh also last time someone had a personal cow, there was a catfish with Elaine
>>>/snow/1778171 So forgive me for being cautious.
No. 53789
>>53788It's pretty obvious you're deflecting, fuck off tranny. You just admitted to writing the thread as if the rules on it weren't blatant enough lmfao.
Who's to say you weren't the one spamming it? What about us nonnas who want to laugh at the fat pig? We don't want it to be a vendetta thread, we want real milk. Maybe the OP can be rewritten someday, or maybe the farmhands will unlock it after some time. Either way, you were clearly trying to cowtip.
No. 53790
>>53789Eh? I didn't even notice she had a thread here when she approached me. Who's to say im not spamming? Logic. Plenty of people said that's a perfectly cromulant OP, if I knew she was technically already a cow I wouldn't have tried scaring her off. I'm sure they'll unlock it for you once that scrote loses interest. As for the why I'm not the spammer? He's dropping a faildox, she has her actual address rather clear on her license even on the ones only revealing the town.
Also say kek not lmfao here.
No. 53815
>>53811Samefag, if anons are wondering, pretty sure this is in reference, or at least an example, of what anon is talking about
>>>/w/281627 It's not the mods fault that anons aren't lurking and learning etiquette. In that case, yes, it is a fair ban.
No. 53824
>>53819I'm going to reveal myself to be retarded and ask where exactly is that rule? I know about
https://lolcow.farm/info &
https://lolcow.farm/rules, but I don't see any specific rule wrt posting multiple images but only sageing the first. For what it's worth I don't care about that ban, I'm sure it was short, but I also just don't see evidence that is a rule anywhere. Maybe I'm retarded though
No. 53827
>>53823>are you arguing that our rules shouldn't be enforced or else it's unfair…?Obviously that's not the point of what I'm saying much less arguing which is what I meant by it. I just didn't realise the redtext was elaborating on the etiquette and the actual ban was for shit posting which is fair honestly.
>>53824As far as I'm aware it's just etiquette, like an unspoken rule but I don't recall seeing it being enforced here after years of lurking (hey maybe I'm just lurking the wrong threads?). Basically you only leave the first image unsaged but sage the rest to not unnecessarily bump the thread above others in the catalogue that might be active at the same time. Personally I don't give a shit either, it was just an offhand observation but that's a pretty controversial (shit kek) thread so I see why anons got defensive coupled with misremembering why the ban was given out.
No. 53829
>>53827Maybe it's enforced and just banned like normal though due to it being just an etiquette thing. Anon in this context was complaining that anons were making up the saging thing because they were
whiteknights and for no other reason, when they were explaining etiquette. Obviously, the mod would flag it as such since anon was typing LikE aN iDioT also over it too, so that everyone can see that that does exist in image dumps.
No. 53831
>>53827ESLchan, for the second time, “arguing” and “making an argument” do not mean fighting or being angry, it’s another way to say “is the point you’re making ___?”
No one was yelling at you, chill out.
No. 53836
>>53835I know who she (WG, fitting nickname kek) is. I know she's a greasy little edgelord TIF, and I know she's done a lot of threadworthy things.
The OP was mostly good, but the "no WKs they must be Rita!" Rule is so hypocritical it makes it blatantly obvious her paranoia about the troon is on some level weighted (like her pooch)
Plus after the thread raid and leaks it seems blatantly like it's a cowtip by a vendetta poster.
No. 53840
(fail)doxing by the moid pepe spammer in
>>>/w/195091again
farmhands, i think that a lockdown is necessary if you don't want to ban vpns (temporarily at least) its clearly a vendetta poster or algs spammer
No. 53848
File: 1677693706625.png (144.66 KB, 421x163, 6.png)
>Newfag ≠ Newfriend I've been noticing this trend as of late as shown above, where anons on here use the word newfriend instead of newfag. Personally I feel like that's just plain newfaggotry on their end for refusing to use newfag as if it's an insult because it has the word fag in it.
>>53847>redtexted for use of the black ascii heartI think that maybe because admin had managed to code in ♥ years ago and so that we would stop using the heart emoticon and others that was allowed years ago which I agree with as I didn't want to be reminded of social media sites where emoticon usage are the norm there.
Also for some reasons the ascii heart would come up as an heart emoji on mobile when on pc it wouldn't. With that I think it created the confusion wheatear or not the heart emoji was allowed.
No. 53885
rape moid is shitting up the rita thread again
>>>/snow/1778636i just want the spam to stop.
the same moid posted his tiny chode in the vocaloid thread and her now defunct kiwi thread.
can we ban whatever the fuck hes using to shit it up?
No. 53887
>>53886im 95% sure he's the tranny because he keeps mentioning alogspace and her "posting her address on alogspace" with no evidence lmfao
it reads like he's sperging out over not being allowed to post doxes, real or fail, about somebody who told him to fuck off.
No. 53893
>>53890No I'm a goofy retard that shouldn't be taken seriously, nothing about me is cool.
>>53892No I did it because everyone else in that thread said they couldn't make OPs, it took twenty minutes to do it isn't some grand feat to sit at some table it's a very clear directing a cow to a site that won't harass her as much as kiwi would. Simple as.
No. 53894
>>53890doesnt it make the wg thread a vendetta thread made because she blocked him though?
one of the thread rules is "dont accuse anyone of being blaine," then it flip flops to "if you arent actively shitting on her you must be rita"
otherwise it's a good thread. but that's likely why blaine got a red text.
anyways, unless blaine posted her address on alogspace in a tranny spammy meltdown i don't know who else it could be other than the chodeposter, but chodeposter isn't that smart.
rita is a retard (ritard) but she isn't the type to pull this shit and i doubt she'd befriend someone who would.
plus rape moid admitted to being a lolcow himself.
No. 53908
>>53902i feel like it would be overkill considering we already have the shaytorium in autosage. having two threads for shayna discussion and both of them in autosage would not be helpful at all imo.
also I agree with you worries, the past 24 hours have been filled with really bad bait posts over really stupid shit. but it only makes it more obvious that someone is being retarded on purpose and not the usual shay retarded type posting. so it wouldn't be good to autosage just because one person is pretending to be retarded. i think just a posts asking to stop engaging would do good like in the pixielocks thread.
No. 53950
File: 1677796577555.jpg (257.4 KB, 1080x2280, Screenshot_20230302-173258_Chr…)
i got banned for forgetting to sage and was told i should have deleted my post and reposted. that's definitely incorrect and not something that was ever enforced. the ban is also unreasonable long for that.
No. 53955
File: 1677801107979.jpg (221.3 KB, 1069x1918, Screenshot_20230302-184606_Chr…)
>>53951this is what i posted. it's pretty standard to announce when you drop sage, since it's pointless to delete and repost the reply since the thread already got bumped. in fact, i've never seen anyone delete and repost for anything other than format editing or typos.
No. 53966
File: 1677816800546.jpg (158.89 KB, 1080x586, Screenshot_20230302_201030_Chr…)
>>53955>>53950Lurk more. You had time to delete it. This isn't a chatroom where you edit** under a post. You also blocked out the reported reply to pretend you posted at different times when you absolutely didn't. These are your posts, learn2sage.
No. 53969
>>53951Absolutely disingenuous, I agree. Anon isn't just hiding their IP,they blocked out time related info and post info so we couldn't go back and check when they posted. Hate anons who play
victim because they think they can do whatever with their posts.
No. 53976
>>53975This guy freaks out differently from what I've seen, I think he's a Guntboard scrote since they cheered the user you linked on if I had to guess which is why he's saying 'boolio wins', could still be Boo but I'm leaning away from it since that dude had clear enemies he focused on which weren't even close to WG.
He's annoying but much like a mosquito he can't do much even after wasting three days.
No. 53998
>>53997She's a misanthropic little pig, but she doesn't deserve to have her address spammed and be threatened with rape repeatedly.
I hope he didn't mean it, but he's insane so he likely did.
No. 54006
File: 1677847727687.jpeg (248.9 KB, 1125x573, 1602974289812.jpeg)
>>53971>Your thesis is absolute bullPicrel
No. 54015
>>54013Nta, but anon purposely hid their post times to claim they couldn't delete it when
>>53966 shows it was still within the timing to delete the post. Mods banned accurately.
No. 54049
>>54044I came to see if anyone else mentioned that.
And i have another complaint - everytime i try to upload pic, different ones, in different threads, everytime it says something like "can't resize photo". Can i fix that? Is it from the site? I'm not an avid poster, but sometimes i try to post and i get that message and it's annoying
No. 54051
File: 1677934799340.png (39.23 KB, 1383x181, CAPTURE.png)
>>54050samefag, like this is very obviously a moid, the topic about dating wasn't even mentioned before hand and this reeks of insecure moid energy
No. 54062
File: 1677978121608.jpg (92.56 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg)
Please for fuck's sake can admin or a janny please explain how they are giving out permabans with NO REASON STATED. I have 0 idea what I did to warrant this. I'm not a particularly egregious poster. I've asked this like 3 times and never get any kind of answer, much less a response to my appeal emails. Am I the only one this happens to? Is it even possible that the wifi I pay for can be used as a VPN and there is some shitty poster coincidentally using my IP? It's fucking annoying.
No. 54063
>>54062That usually happens when anons confuse you for a moid, more often than not a TIM.
It still isn't OK, though.
No. 54067
File: 1678012634630.jpg (577.29 KB, 1080x4190, ok.jpg)
>>54065I was banned in 2022 with no explanation and 0 replies to my email. I was unbanned apparently and able to make a single post before I got a new permaban. I was on for maybe 5 minutes at that point.
No. 54078
>>54076Nta but
>there's probably a reasonIsn't that why anon is asking, so she can figure out the reason? Also it's not like it's rocket science to like, download one of the browsers that have a vpn.
No. 54083
>>54076so hilarious, the lack of communication. Maybe anon doesn't want to use a workaround because she doesn't want to break the rules of the site despite having been unfairly banned?
I was banned for being blaine when I am not blaine (and this is absolutely clear from my post history), so glad the new admins unfucked all the old incorrect bans. But people like you will crow on and on about how there must be a reason - sometimes the reason is that the janny lost her mind. period.
No. 54091
>>54089Then the site has a massive security issue and they need to have downtime for everyone for security's sake until they can figure out who is phishing/where it is coming from.
That's not what's happening though.
I hope an admin addresses that so that this conspiracy doesn't become a new situation the same way anons were trying to get farmers to attack mods by telling others that mods are pretending to be farmers and baiting anons in threads just to ban them in return.
No. 54092
>>54091>anons were trying to get farmers to attack mods by telling others that mods are pretending to be farmers and baiting anons in threads just to ban them in return.1. you make no sense
2. anons = farmers. jesus how deep does your fantasy go?
3. no one alleged what i think you are saying
4. you are very anti-anon and pro-mod despite mods making mistakes like normal people do.
No. 54093
>>54089yo in your opinion is that why someone wanted an anon to post her IP in this thread? that was weird
>>53036 is the post
No. 54097
>>54093Completely, glad others are observant as I am.
>>54095Wrong one.
No. 54098
>>54093>>54097That's not the behind-the-wall type of phishing I'm talking about and anons aren't dumb enough to post their IP like that such as the example you quoted, that's why the phishing thing doesn't actually make any sense.
The chances of people coming to this site and their IPs always being used by VPN users is really, really specific unless you're all using a shitty VPN and doing the same places constantly and even then the likelihood of it being the same VPN IP is so slim, which in that case it's not your own IP to even complain about getting banned. So I'm wondering what exactly is going on then?
No. 54108
File: 1678046536772.jpg (945.46 KB, 2564x2048, okee.jpg)
>>54067This is my post. Here are the appeal emails which went completely unanswered. I sent another one recently but it wasn't worded quite as kindly as these ones kek. I chose this background specially for the genius itt who defitintely totally figured out my ebil scheme. Good work. I'll continue to use vpn's because I don't trust any of these mods/jannies/whatevers. I'm still not convinced it wasn't a tranny janny because around the time of the first permaban I was talking a lot of shit on disgusting trannies. It's the only thing I can think of. I don't understand how I was able to make that one post the other day on my native IP and get permabanned immediately. It was weird too because I got a regular ban which expired immediately ON TOP of my permaban?? Like? (It was because I said "I smell scrotum" in a thread. I'm not here 24/7 like some other nonnies and it's not written anywhere in the rules soooooo how tf was I supposed to know that was a bannable offense? I know now, and because I'm not a retard hell-bent on shitting up this site, I will refrain from making such accusations now that I am aware it's against board rules.)
No. 54130
>>54120we aren’t 4chan
nonny please don’t feel like you have to prove shit, it just makes you look retarded