[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password
(For post deletion)

Welcome former PULL users!
Click here to start migrating to our sister forum
Farmhand applications are open

File: 1596880322539.gif (490.7 KB, 500x282, crybaby.gif)

No. 16005

Please post all general issues and complaints here. If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.
>>>/meta/6821 should only be used for technical issues and suggestions (can't load site, site slow, bugs, site feature requests). This thread is for non-technical issues.
If you use the thread to infight or instigate arguments you'll be banned from /meta/. If you come here to make a complaint that could have been handled with a report you will be ignored.

No. 16006

>>16004
This is the most based take you've ever had, thanks admin.
>I don't trust most applicants or their motives so what the hell makes you think I'm going to trust a male's motives on getting involved with the site at any capacity?
This. There's no reason that's not suspicious for a male to try to infiltrate a mod team for a site full of women.

No. 16007

There's a Finnish anon who has been identifying herself across multiple threads and confirming her identity several times, checking in daily as finnanon etc. I'm pretty sure she's bordering on namefagging at this stage

No. 16008

Okay, not to be autistic, but I got a one-week ban for posting an explicit gif in the yaoi thread, which I deserved for being a sped and not reading the rules.

That said, why the fuck wasn't the other person (the one who posted all the gang rape) banned for a week? Why was she allowed to shit up /ot/ and /meta/? I post one picture of vanilla Yaoi hentai and I get a week ban, but the retard who spammed a bunch of pictures of gangrape and chimped about the deletion gets off scot-free? Was she just ban-evading? The hell happened here

No. 16009

>>16008
Are you still doing this? Leave Gangrape-chan alone.

No. 16010

>>16008
She was ban evading to sperg. A few of her posts sperging about it on different places got reftexted. I reckon not all of them were redtexted due to her persistent sperg

No. 16011

I hope OP image is a deterrent for stupid complaints LMAO

No. 16012

Can "Cis" as well as "Terf" be redtexted please?

No. 16013

>>16010
Okay, thanks. I should've figured she was just ban-evading, lol. I was just being autistic and making assumptions based on the fact none of her /meta/ posts were redtexted.

No. 16015

Although I didn't want to add yet another shit thread to LC, I managed to. Could we potentially add the names in the title of the Shay thread so my idiocy doesn't hinder people from finding it?

>Shayna Clifford/Dolly Mattel and Kyle Nathan Perkins of Tulsa, Oklahoma

Thread: >>>/snow/1020582

No. 16016

Someone is posting gore, saw it on the front page, not sure what thread

No. 16017

>>16016
Samefag just accidentally saw it it's in the kisame thread in snow

No. 16018

Some tard posting gore in the kisame thread.

No. 16021

Admin what is the circumference of your skull?

No. 16022

>>16021
About 7

No. 16023

>>16022
7 what? Use your units.

No. 16024

im sorry farmhands for reporting a 4 year old post like a retard, im too high

No. 16025

Gore posting tard back again in the kisame thread

No. 16026

>>16025
Yea, came here for that too. Can we just delete the whole thread? He's not milky, just fuckin annoying

No. 16027

Please ban a user known as Dawn in Manson thread FOREVER. She's derailing the thread, posting about herself and insulting farmers. Many many many thanks in advance.

No. 16030

Can someone ban the retard whos bumping old threads in /PT/

No. 16031

>>16030
thanks for posting this lmao i went in PT and literally thought i was losing my mind when the most recent thread was from a year ago

No. 16032

Someone fix the pt thread, it keeps showing old threads and I can’t find the current ones

No. 16033

Somebody is bumping all the old threads in pt

No. 16034

Please just lock the Kisame threads, tired of seeing that shit bumped.

No. 16035

I'm curious, did mods autosage the kisame thread? He continues to post but it's not bumping.

No. 16036

>>16035
hopefully. let him scream into the void.

No. 16037

The new lolita general is filled with people whiteknighting cows and accusing others of being cows/having vendettas because the OP post didn’t include a recap of every single thing that happened in the last thread.

No. 16038

Someone in the Nicole thread is having an out of nowhere spergfest regarding white-knighting for some reason even though nothing recent sees to be white-knighting. Did their ban get lifted or something and they are pissed? Lol

>>>/w/109449

No. 16040

Some anons on the Micky Moon thread on /w/ keep whiteknighting mikaila and others keep calling random anons "Emi" (her ex friend). It's getting very annoying and we know her sister lurks and posts, maybe a post history needs to be done.

No. 16041

Please give us back the Absolute stupid retard shitpost thread on /ot/, it's more like a toilet than a thread to discuss dumbass shit and many anons loved it

No. 16042

>>16040
I can promise you, that it isn't her sister posting. You guys are just absolute nutcases and hate the bitch

No. 16044

>>16042
Hide the thread if you don't like it.

No. 16045

>>16044
Samefag, can the anon the keeps bumping the Micky thread to bitch about there being no milk be banned? They don't know how to sage and bumped it just to say "kek".

No. 16046

>>16038
What's the point of that thread anyway? I see it constantly being bumped to the first page of /w/ and it's always just some seething vendetta anon spamming her selfies and crying about photoshop. Every time I try reading it to see if she actually has some interesting drama it's just that same spergy anon getting redtexted and accusing the mods of being Nicole WKs. It's the same as it was when she was still being posted to the costhot general, just the world's most generic e-girl with filtered photos and posting fanservice-y social media updates. I don't understand why she warrants her own thread.

>>16041
The problem with that thread is that it gets filled instantly, then another one is created, then another, and soon you have a catalog full of these "shitposting" threads. This is not a chatting platform, this is an imageboard.

No. 16047

>>16046
Idk. Ive reported the thread a few times and some posts. It's all nitpicking and if you don't nitpick the smallest things too or call them out on their insane tinfoil, you're a whiteknight. The thread shouldnt have even been made the first time around, but the Vendetta-chan trying to get her roasted for 2 years, seems to be hellbent on it and took it as a challenge and thus we have a thread on /w/ with weak ass, no milk, vendetta posting. Mods have pointed it out several times too, so I dont get why the thread is even eing given another chance. They post no content images where no names are posted either, but demad you agree its about Nicole. Come on. And everything is tinfoil. They just assume all this stuff is fake and all without proof of any of it. Tinfoil isn't milk.Farmers have been saying that and the argument is 'hide the thread'. Admin admitted its the same person over and over too, so..

No. 16048

Can farmhands mark Britney Venti's self posts in the June/shuwu thread? No idea how often she's in there but she just outed herself by posting her own tweet kek.

No. 16049

>>16047
Can you seriously shut the fuck up already and hide the thread if you don't like it? It's so annoying constantly seeing people whine and bitch over threads they don't like. Nicole's thread is hardly active until some retard enters it to whine about nitpicking and vendettas, you create the infighting in the thread yourself. Hide it if you don't like it, the majority of people posting in her thread Sage their posts anyways. Her thread will die off eventually if people stop posting in it to sperg about vendettas.

No. 16051

>>16049
Isnt there some thread all the nitpickers can go to so that they don't have to bump threads in /w/ then? Telling people to hide a thread, so that the anons can have a free for all regardless of rules about posting, seems ridiculous.

No. 16052

better not lock /abg/ or i will say the n word

No. 16053

Why can't we bring up politics in the leftthot thread?

No. 16054

>>16053

Politics is barely relevant even in that thread. We’re here to talk about the personalities, not to infight. It derails the conversation and now there’s someone race baiting

No. 16055

>>16048
Went to see and unfortunately that isn’t her, she posted a screen cap of the tweet before the post

She definitely lurks though, she takes info here for her videos

No. 16056

Can a mod come in and tell people to stop derailing about the thread? The whole thread is just filled with bitching. >>>/pt/791146 We get the OP sucks and it's spoilered. Nothing we can do about it now, but it's all straight derailing.

No. 16057

>>16056
The spoiler was put on by mods and not when the thread was created. If anons want the thread created to their liking then they should take initiative and make the threads from here on out.

No. 16058

>>16057
I didn't mean the spoiler was intentional, anon. I'm talking about it as a disappointment in general, not a criticism. I've been around since way early, p-anon, and I honestly don't give a damn about headers since, probably like most anons, I just have the tab open at all times and never look at it again. Someone can greentext and tag the OP if needed, but no one wants to do that either, so they are just wanting to complain and derail to complain and derail. The thread is already filled with good milk. Restarting another one because some greentext is missing is retarded.

No. 16059

>>16058
I'm sorry. I'm a bit defensive because its a recoccuring cycle I'm seeing the more threads that are made. I see that certain anons want to sit in the backseat but they never want to drive. The previous thread was full of bickering and probably would have maxed out.

No. 16060

>>16059
I actually also like the idea of a thread being prepped about 20 posts prior. I don't know if that's allowed, but that way it's ready. No matter what, anons always have something to complain about the OP every thread. Either "i wanted this picture instead' and post about why wasn't x used or not agreeing with the greentext because something is missing or it was repeated and now 'old'. It's lolcow. It's fine as is.

No. 16061

Can the cp derailing be put to rest in the Shoe thread? It doesn't even have to do with Shoe anymore, people are derailing it into a convo about vaush and pedophilia.

No. 16062

Can we please nuke the Tessah Jordin thread? It's literally just canyon talking to himself half the time and their toxic relationship isn't milky

No. 16063

>>16060
Having a thread ready before the old one reaches its limit is stupid because people will see the new thread, think the old one is locked and use that which leads to two threads being active simultaneously. And posting the new link to the old thread won’t help with that, since people will ignore it for the sake of replying to stuff (and I can’t blame them).
There also doesn’t need to be a new thread ready to post immediately when the old one is locked when there’s not even milk. It’s happened a couple of times already that a new thread with a shitty OP was made JUST to nitpick something and then it’s been basically dead for about a day or two.
Yes, she’s released actual porn, that’s kinda milky, but not as urgent as if there was new milk flowing by the minute.

It’s also funny how you complain about nobody wanting to do the work of creating a new thread when they’re literally getting posted way before they’re even necessary. Well, yeah, obviously nobody’s gonna even get the chance to make one if you jump the gun like that.

No. 16064

>>16056
>>16057
>>16058
>>16063

I don't give a fuck about spoiler thread pics, but the most recent Momokun OP is a shit thread. Not a good recap, made too early, not linked in last thread in addition to spoiler pic. It's a shit OP thread and I think should be red texted as that, to shame anon even more so they will never make a thread again. Moo has plenty of old school farmers who can make a decent thread at the right time, and this autistic anon wanted to prove a point and jumped the gun. As one of the most popular cows she doesn't need a newfag making an "effort" and failing.

No. 16065

>>16064
who even cares when the stupid link list pushes the summary down out of the OP so you never see it when you browse. i doubt anyone ever sees it except the other tryhards that wanted to write it.
So here's my suggestion Fucking put the summary above the links if there's 30 links

No. 16066

>>16064
Why wouldn't the mods tag the thread as "shit thread" when they spoilered the thread pic? I'm sorry you're having a tantrum over a thread pic. I hope you use this energy to make a thread next time.

No. 16068

>>16066
Its nit that big a deal. Jesus. Derailing about it should get a red text. The thread has milk already. Greentext and tag OP if yku want it updated, but linked. This is lolcow. No1currs except the handful of anons samefagging complaints. Its derailing as hell and tbh I hope the posts get reported bc of it. The thread is already happening a the mods dont care about the 2 days of complaining about it.

No. 16069

Can you ban astrology in threads outside of its own thread?

No. 16071

why was the kpop critical thread locked/are users allowed to make new ones?

No. 16072

>>16069
This really feels like a Scorpio rising.

No. 16073

Newfags are trying to keep the >>>/pt/791146 bringing up her race and heritage and what their surnames mean. This was discussed dozens of threads ago, way early on. Newfags coming in and reposting old milk to keep the thread bumping is derailing AF

No. 16074

>>16072
Idk, what about mars in capricorn tho

No. 16075

>>16071
It’s banned forever please stop asking

No. 16076

>>16073
> If you come here to make a complaint that could have been handled with a report you will be ignored.

No. 16077

>>16076
It was hours worth of derailing. Dont get mad you got banned for it bc this is where complaints go when stuff gets derailed and wont stop.

No. 16078

>>16077
>>16076

And no one can mention it in the thread without minimod reports, so what what do you want, anon?

No. 16079

>>16077
Read the OP, anon. They were quoting it. That’s what greentexting usually is newfriend. Racebaiting is against the rules so report it and wait for the farmhands to handle it.

No. 16080

Theres this stupid anon samefagging on the Micky Moon thread and only replying with "kek" on this thread. It is getting annoying.
I think it must be someone close to Micky. They just keep derailing.

No. 16083

>>16079
There are other complaints in the thread like this and mods acted after the complaint was posted because this was going on for a few hours and a day. Sometimes just reports don't cut it because mods have to file through reports too whereas you can post here and it can be seen sooner. Especially because of how derailing it was and how old the milk was. It wasn't racebaiting either. You obviously weren't in the thread to see what happened and someone has been reposting old milk for the past week and derailing already discussed topics because no one has posted any new OF content to nitpick. Leave it up to the mods, anon.

No. 16084

>>16083
calm down

No. 16086

Kindly requesting a mod to lock the binkie princess thread, I was the original OP and it's just full of the same 2 literal retards bumping it with old unfunny shit and mongoloid behaviour

>>16062
Agree with this, at first I tried to keep up but it's just literally not interesting to the point it has to be a very small handful of people bumping it constantly

No. 16087

please nuke the onision thread. unintegrated anons, twitter spergs, unbearable newfaggotry, its just all terrible and unfunny

No. 16088

Some retard/s in the leftthots snow thread keep detailing with non-milk political conspiracies about Russiagate and China

No. 16089

I'm genuinely asking someone to look into the farmhands ban log on /ot/ or to update the rules. They seem to ban for any reason. I reported race bait and it was still up/OP replying 30 mins later so I replied and got banned for race bait replying and told to just report while OP was still active. Op stayed active talking about how Asain people are XYZ for a few hours and nothing was done. Apparently because OP claimed they were Asian they were allowed to make sweeping generalizations about Asian people, but responding to it as an Asian person gets you banned.

They are banning people for "GC discussion" even when the discussion is centered round gender non-conforming women. trannies etc were NOT being mentioned. Anons were literally talking about what being gnc/butch means to lesbians and how it has evolved. I understand not everyone cares about that, but it's a bannable fucking offense now? They also banned an anon for talking about how men succeed in womans space easier than vice versa because they said it was gc talk and not welcomed here. Again, trans shit WAS NOT even close to being mentioned. How the fuck is any of that gc talk? liberal feminists discuss this shit. If you don't want feminist talk on this site just say that, but I think one of the farmhands is genuinely a retard and thinks all feminists talk = radfem ideology.

If we are not allowed to discuss even issues like this that is fine because this is admins site, but can you please update rules? I have no idea what is acceptable feminist discourse here and what is not anymore.

I've noticed this mostly happens late at night/early morning so I assume it's just one farmhand but it's making /ot/ fucking awful.

No. 16090

>>16089
How come you know those people got banned? None of the posts about the gnc thing were red texted.

No. 16091

>>16088
there was already a warning against them but the russiagate obsessed anon kept going.
speaking of that thread, do any farmhands know about the leftthot cows? i have such a strong feeling along with other anons that the people discussed in the thread are there posting too lol, it would be amazing to see them exposed one day

No. 16094

>>16089
The moderating is so inconsistent. During the same hour someone gets banned in 5 minutes for replying to bait while farmhands drag their feet banning the people planting it. I always report stuff like racebait/scroteposting but then sometimes I come back to it an hour later and it's still going, as anons who don't know any better are replying and I'd get banned myself for pointing out that the OP is an obvious male robot trying to get a reaction from the nasty girl imageboard.

If they really wanted to get rid of muh politics and feminism they'd just remove the offtopic boards altogether. Having an anonymous board for women is bound to steer towards feminist discussion because it's such a big, daily part of our lives and we have nowhere to vent about it. Most of us post our daily "whats ur astrology sign" fluff everywhere else but Lolcow because it's inoffensive enough to take part in on social media or other places that requires an actual identifiable handle.
>ib4: asherahsgarden.net, anon!!!!
Like many others I don't want my life to revolve around talking about how horrible men and trannies are but I do enjoy a short, organic discussion about it every now and then in the /ot/ threads. I just wish farmhands would ban the bait immediately instead of coming in 6 hours later to yell at everyone else but the original poster clearly looking to ignite a fight like the "lmao just have sex femcels!!!" take did.

No. 16096

Agree with whoever posted in the Shayna thread that if people are posting caps/pics it's not necessarily nitpicking since it's content.

No. 16097

I was reading unpopular opinions, and I'm genuinely curious. Is BLM as an organisation/movement and police brutality completely off topic in general, or is it acceptable if race isn't mentioned or the point of the post? I can see how it could be perceived as bait considering the kind of discussions it promotes so I'm honestly wondering?

No. 16099

the Heather Explores thread is being ruined by (what seems like) the same few people who seem personally mad at her, write long diary entry spergs addressed to her, and are now photoshopping clown noses on her pics lol. she’s such a funny snowflake but the people who know her personally are so easy to spot and their constant cringe is making the thread hard to read.

No. 16100

Thank you for the twitterfag bans, but can you please be harsher in artist salt? I'm fucking tired of infighting on that thread.

No. 16101

>>16096
whoever mods the shayna threads lets so much infighting and stupid shit get by and then they ban normal shit for 'nitpicking'
its consistently inconsistent

No. 16102

>>16096
A few Shay threads ago Admin said in that she would start banning sex workers that out themselves or come to LC purely to nitpick other sex workers. Remember that farmhands can see post history so they know if someone is doing it in multiple threads. It does look like it's out of nowhere but they might be seeing something we're not.

No. 16103

File: 1598561747269.jpg (41.71 KB, 676x593, 104143895_967382737031115_1261…)

im basically fine with the other rules in unpopular opinions thread, lmao but >If you are here to explain in detail why every man is shit - BAN
bothers me because, well, it's retarded? literally on every message board we see men screaming roastie, femoid or even the rogue tits or gtfo with no repercussions. whats the reason for banning male hate posts, even if it's borderline sperging? like what are admins trying to achieve with it? i don't see male hate posts causing infighting, but maybe im dumb. it's not like males are allowed to post here anyways (lol). genuinely curious. naturally lots of us have found this site to be better than 4chan or whatever the fuck because we aren't hit with insults for being women. this is a female only site so why are anons not allowed sperg about men?

No. 16104

>>16103
Imo I’m glad it’s banned because it’s so repetitive and kind of derails the thread because they barely even have an unpopular opinion in there they just use it as an excuse to go on these long political rants like how is that an ‘unpopular opinion’ when it’s just a rambling borderline manifesto. Why are people so desperate to try and make this site their personal revenge for being called a roastie on r9k or whatever who cares what’s allowed there or not. This site has always had way stricter rules than 4chan, it’s not like it’s only stricter in that one aspect or anything. The point of the site was never to be some kind of feminist imageboard or male hate site and because of the constant sperging that’s what it’s becoming. It’s just going to alienate users idk it’s kind of like when anachans wouldn’t stop sperging it just becomes boring and exhausting.

No. 16106

>>16104
NTA, Then maybe there should be… idk… a THREAD for it? People shouldn't have to choose between stifling their feelings on what actually fucks with them day to day (patriarchy and other gross scrote things) vs going somewhere else and leaving their favorite site.

Every since I discovered lolcow, I've loved it. It would be really cool if we could ACTUALLY talk about anything here instead of being made to "hush hush" about that ONE thing. (Racism is understandable because the world is extremely volatile wrt race/BLM/protesting etc. Same with coronavirus, everyone gets it). But patriarchy and dealing with men is our day to day. There should be a thread where we can go to vent and say "Fuck it I hate men and all men are stupid" without being banned.

I don't wanna go to whatever shitty site asaharera garden or whatever is. I wanna stay here for everything. I'm sure other people feel this way as well.

No. 16108

>>16106
But you do have a whole board for it and there’s absolutely no reason for you not to go there. You can still use your ‘favourite site’ for other things and just use the other to sperg about men but you can’t change the site just to suit what you want. Having anorexia is a ‘huge part’ of anachans life but I still don’t want to hear about it every other post. If their constant sperging hadn’t been addressed they would have just attracted more and more users like that until the site eventually just became a pro ana site. That’s basically what happened with lolcow but for pp things. It’s not hush hush about this one thing, there’s multiple banned topics and lolcow has absolutely never been an ‘anything goes’ place. If you want that, make a new site and stop trying to over run this one.

No. 16109

>>16107
The big issue though is that there USED to actually be a thread for it. So it's not "changing the site". It's just trying to get it back.

No. 16110

>>16109
When topics get banned for excessive sperging (anachans, Anisa, race, Berry Tsukasa) the thread always gets banned too because they attract other undesirable users like that and containment doesn’t work. This isn’t a new thing.

No. 16111

Giving farmhands the ability to view post historys of every poster - outside off exposing samefagging cows in their own threads - is a terrible idea and only invites powertripping and vendettas.

No. 16112

>>16111
How exactly do you expect them to find samefagging cows if they can't see everyone's post history though….

No. 16113

>>16106
>I don't wanna go to whatever shitty site asaharera garden or whatever is.
It's not a shitty site, it's actually quite nice and it would be even nicer if it was more active. It's not completely an either-or thing, you know.

>>16112
By asking Admin for permission to use/activate that function. Most of the time several anons already suspect the samefagging beforehand so that wouldn't be too much of an issue.

No. 16114

>>16111
This I could agree with but I also feel it's necessary, though at least make it limited history. What I said 3 months ago shouldn't really affect how mods treat me now.

I'm always scared to write a confession or something because I'm afraid a mod is gonna list it out (not that it matters, we're all anon) but that shit is kinda embarrassing anyway)

No. 16115

>>16103
True, its not the male hate posts that i have seen causing fights but other anons getting salty over it that has, which is ironic given the whole nature of this site.

No. 16116

>>16113
>>16113
>>16114
Contrary to popular belief, we do not actually read anyone's post history unless they've repeatedly broken the rules and ban evaded and even then we only skim it (cows being an exception to the rule). The myth going around that there's only 30 users on here is also false. We go through up to 400 reports a day and the time it would take to read everyone's post history is not time anyone has.

I realize this is our word against yours but if you really feel a certain way about this then feel free to use a VPN. They're not banned on here, after all.

No. 16117

File: 1598601042337.png (75.68 KB, 1492x507, transsperg.PNG)

>>16108
The part about ana-chan sperging is that it's a niche issue promoting a life-threatening condition. Manhate and tranny hijinx on the other hand are something the majority of the userbase (assuming we're mostly women) deal with on a daily basis so it's something that happens naturally. The spergouts I've witnessed always come from some bait anon deliberately posting "why do you sad toxic femcels hate trans people/men so much????" and anons who probably peaked recently and aren't aware of the issue being banworthy start replying and dragging it. Pic related, these kinds of posts constantly pop up and unless a farmhand is fast enough to ban them with a redtext they can just keep going for hours. If it was just people venting for the hell of it because they had a bad experience or found some milk it wouldn't last that long, a few posts tops. But there always has to be some smoothbrain picking up a fight with "I'M SO SICK OF YOUR MANHATE SPERGING REEEEE" because they can't just ignore it and here we go again.

The more fitting allegory would be an ana-chan posting "Why don't you BMI 20 fatties lose some fucking weight?" all the time imo. Which is exactly what they got banned for in the first place.

No. 16118

File: 1598601623398.png (26.79 KB, 1500x193, dry pussylips.PNG)

>>16117
Samefag: this post in particular was in the artist salt thread related to the ongoing drama of a big-name artist being cancelled over an innocuous joke by the SJW crowd, anons mentioning that she deserves it for recently taking part in the mob canceling JKR and feeding to the culture, then (assuming the same) anon pops up just to crudely bitch at other other anons for defending JKR (pic related), anons basically replied to her with "kek" and "leave" to her and she then posted this as a retort. This kind of forced infighting happens all the time and thankfully this time the farmhand redtexted this sperg immediately. My point being that in my experience it's not the "radfems" derailing the discussion and obsessively bringing up troons, it's always the party that gets their feelings hurt over any critical mention of them.

No. 16119

Not a complaint because I don’t think it’s something that can change easily but is it me or are people uncomfortably edgy in maria’s and venus‘ threads? I don’t think it’s le scrotes doing it, but it’s still very uncomfortable. Even harmless annoying mild nitpicking is better than the aggressive posts I see in a lot of subject’s threads come to think of it. It was always a thing but I just realized how weird it is to read posts that are written aggressively.

No. 16120

>>16113
> It's not a shitty site, it's actually quite nice and it would be even nicer if it was more active.
It would be even nicer if it had not been made by a man pretending to be a woman, y’know.

Although I do agree that it’s kinda ironic to not be able to complain about issues that are related to womanhood specifically (i.e. PP-stuff), I get why the threads and eventually any discussion was banned. The sperging was insufferable and bleeading out over the entire board, even /pt/ etc. which eventually did become a problem.
However, still don’t really understand why 2X got nuked. I feel like the containment could’ve worked once the whole outrage had calmed down a little.
But oh, well…

No. 16124

>>16117
Anachan sperging wasn’t banned for any moralfag reason about it being a life threatening disorder it was simply because it was derailing and annoying. You can still post and vent about your personal negative day to day experiences that include men as they’ve specified but ‘manhate’ and ‘tranny hininx’ are not universal things the average woman ‘goes through on a daily basis’ at all. I doesn't matter anyway, race related issues would be something plenty of anons go through daily but that doesn’t mean people want to hear daily sperg outs about it.

>>16120
I mean how is pp inherently “related to womanhood“ just because it’s an ideology that certain woman believe any more than any other banned topic is because there will be certain women that also relate to those. I’m a woman and don’t find the pp sperging relatable at all, neither do the vast majority of women in the world. This isn’t a radical feminist imageboard. People can still talk about their personal negative experiences with men? This site was also made by a man who was actually pretending (implying) he was a woman to the point he had to apologise for misleading people so idk why you’re more comfortable with it here than the new board. Asherahsgarden or whatever it’s called is run by a woman now so what’s the problem with using it?

No. 16125

Please ban the word nonnie. It being redtexted isn't enough because it just brings more attention to it. It's crying laughing emoji tier

No. 16126

>>16124
Yeah, well I don't fuck with K-pop or like guys spattered in blood but there are respective threads for each of those topics, so what that anon said about it having a containment thread makes sense. EVERY woman deals with misogyny.

And no we fucking can't just talk about how men suck, did you even read the list of bannable offenses? A lot of women here would like to sperg about how shitty men are and we should at least be able to vent.

No. 16127

>>16124
Chill, I was using PP as an umbrella term and generally agree with you. I never tried to legitimate any radfem sperging either, nor did I support the call for a thread. I just felt like since pretty much all women in some way are affected by sexism, it would make sense for a women-centered imageboard to have some designated space to talk about. But as I’ve said: I do agree that keeping it to said designated space in form of a thread (or even several threads) didn’t work, so it also makes sense to not allow it anymore.
But, you know, stay angry.

Also never said that was the sole reason not to use it. It was just the cherry on top. AG is dead and boring. For someone who has no interests besides self-pity and radical feminism it might be a viable alternative. But I personally am not gonna start using a second image board just for casual feminist discourse. But as I’ve said, I’m not crying to revive the PP/Man-Hate/Radfem/GC threads either, since that obviously didn’t work out.

No. 16128

>>16126
K-pops been a banned topic for a while now due to them sperging and bleeding into other threads. Bad example to use because they got the same treatment as pp & GC for not behaving

No. 16130

>>16124
>Anachan sperging wasn’t banned for any moralfag reason about it being a life threatening disorder it was simply because it was derailing and annoying.
That's what was implied here though?
>The more fitting allegory would be an ana-chan posting "Why don't you BMI 20 fatties lose some fucking weight?" all the time imo. Which is exactly what they got banned for in the first place.

Just because you don't have to deal with blatant sexism personally doesn't mean it isn't an universal issue most women face all the time. Like >>16126 said it's not like we don't get banned for venting about how much men drive us insane because we'll get banned for m-muh pp sperging even if it's just something personal we experienced and want to get off our chest instead of screeching about how all male babies should be aborted. You don't have to be a radfem terf gc whatever derailer to be pissed off at the shit casual misogyny makes you go through.

No. 16131

>>16130
Pretty sure farmhand said personal experiences are fine as long as it doesn’t go into political derailing and long discussions about wanting to kill all men?

No. 16132

>>16116
Well, fair enough.

30 USERS ANON BTFO

No. 16133

>>16124
Aren't you getting tired of discussing the anachan comparison every single thread? I could've sworn this whole post was already posted almost sentence for sentence last thread.

>>16119
I think in Venus' case it's some kind of edgy defense-mechanism after the thread got tackled with white-knighting and tinfoils too many times.

No. 16134

>>16130
>>16126
>If you are here to complain that your boyfriend did x/ you got cat called/ you had a bad day due to a man - NO BAN.

>If you are here to talk about your personal experience and opinions. - NO BAN.


You can still post about your personal experiences with misogyny.

No. 16135

>>16118
Some radfems used to derail but they've pretty much stopped since the Purge. The issue is, it empowered pickmes and trannies so now they feel this is their website. The topics should never have been banned in the first place, just very harsh bans for derailing.

No. 16136

>>16134
But we can't we talk about generalized misogyny? Why does it all need to be personal?

No. 16137

>>16135
>The issue is, it empowered pickmes and trannies so now they feel this is their website.
Ok so I havent kept track of this but do they at least get warned, banned if they sperg out? I remember some time ago in some thread some trumblr tranny reeing about hetronormitivity or something and I kinda left for a while after that. I think what most anons want is equal treatment across the board-at least that hows I read most of the complaints about the site.
I mean, do we need to worry about this place becoming crystal cafe?

No. 16138

the problem with some anons is that they get a 5-30 minute ban and sperg out in /meta/ about unfair bans, when essentially its just a time out or warning or whatever. even just getting 12 hrs or a day isnt bad. the idea is lol calm down.

>inb4 change ban page to say warning

No. 16140

Why aren't more banners added? there's very cool ones there, like the ones with momokun

No. 16141

>>16140
>t. Momokun

No. 16143

Genuinely, is one of the tamara spergs responding to her actually Greg? I never flippantly think cows post here all the time and I never thought it was Greg in any thread until now, the cadence and written tone of some of those responses from them you can tell are from the same person and they sound very, very like him

And regardless, can Tamara posting please be a totally banned topic?

No. 16144

>>16136
Because its a few dedicated gendersperges posting. In the unpopular opinions thread farmhand outed that one of the posters had hundreds of gendersperge posts on that thread alone. It makes sense, since the thread was starting to resemble the gc threads and most of normal posters had left because of the derail. Now its starting to resemble actual unpopular opinions again.

No. 16145

>>16144
why not just ban the poster?

No. 16146

the momokun thread should be autosaged, honestly. a decent chunk of posts in every thread don’t even have anything to do with her, sometimes it’s unrelated altogether. she hasn’t produced actual milk in ages. usually i just keep her thread hidden but sometimes lolcow resets my hidden threads and i’m reminded just how little the posts have changed.

No. 16147

>>16138
Yeah I have seen those sperges on here and its pathetic crying over a 5 or 30 minute ban.

>>16140
I think maybe the mods/jannies haven't had time, theres some from quite some time back that are yet to be added.

No. 16148

>>16146
>she hasn’t produced actual milk in ages
Arguable. Hasn't she started doing actual PIV porn recently?

No. 16149

>>16148
She already did. Someone is just mad at the small derailing we had, but two users were put out to pasture before anon even came to complain, so it was long over with already.

No. 16150

>>16149
None of the above anons but those "small derails" are a fucking 50-post spergfests over nitpicking whatever meaningless bullshit people throw at the wall like "oh my god how dare she go outside during the pandemic", "look at her stupid face I got pausing her IG story mid-movement" and "how is she meeting her dad when she said he was abusive towards her in her teens what a liar!!!!" and the actual milk of her degrading herself to do PiV porn with some new cuck orbiter gets buried. The thread is unreadable.

No. 16151

>>16150
I went back and counted, even including excluding posts in between that had nothing to do with it. It was 21 posts, 4 bans. It was handled within hours. Moo is very milky. Anons get restless a lot in her thread.

Just report because all the other ones aside from the whole race and BLM discussion is just 2 or 3 that are shit posts. You can tell because they are unsaged and nitpicking. It's not a bunch of people derailing for hours on end. Calm down.

No. 16152

Can a mod please ban Dawn from the MM thread? Or autosage/nuke the threads? The last few threads have been trash tier with no milk and dawn posting at herself. It's frustrating because there's the occasional good milk but it gets BURIED under dawn's constant samefagging.

No. 16156

Could someone PLEASE tell the Left thots to sage!

No. 16158

Can we bring back the kpopcritical threads they were the funnest threads!!!!

No. 16159

>>16152
I agree that Dawn should be somehow removed from the thread but please dear farmhands do not delete the current and previous thread.
Anon is right, we had some good milk, ex victims' dms got posted. I doubt they'll come back to lolcow and post them anew.

No. 16160

>>16158
THEY'RE BANNED FOREVER STOP ASKING!!!!

No. 16161

>>16160
i feel like the anons that bring that and gc up every other day are hopefully bsitposting. no one can be this retarded this consistently

No. 16162

Wasn't it always the rule that if a cow is self-posting and pretending it's not them, they get their posts marked? I just caught up with Tesah's threads yesterday but the ammount of cow-posting there, jesus. Would be milky to mark their posts Mystery-style.

No. 16163

>>16162
I know me and other anons asked in meta but it never happened. He screenshot his own post and admitted it so they could even work off that.

No. 16165

Can we please get another Hellweek soon or something? So many newfags in snow who refuse to sage and blog all over the place. I'm not sure if it's Leftthot thread bleedover or what but these bitches just don't care about integrating and it's really annoying.

No. 16166

Hi mods
The TND thread has devolved into nitpicking at Taylor’s appearance because she’s not producing a lot of milk.
Can you help?
It’s just “hehe look Taylor doesn’t look good from the angle” shit

No. 16167

Could we please have the fact Momokun had a breast reduction and that's why she has fucked up scarred veiny tits added to the next OP to help with titpicking? It comes up every single fucking thread.

No. 16168

It seems I am not the first to complain about the MM thread but there's been no improvement so far.
Just explain to me how is that possible that a dumb troll, who's been caught lying several times, keeps posting completely irrelevant caps with no context, no evidence and never gets banned? She turned the threads into bs. TWO THREADS DEAR FARMHANDS!!!
WHY hasn't she been banned?
WHY anons who talks to her are not banned either?
Is it some sort of magic? Naming her posts doesn't help.
We do have new milk, we could enjoy it if she wasn't around trying to silence every anon and continuously demanding attention with her vapid posting. It's insane and insufferable.
Please, do something!

No. 16169

>>16168
she's ban evading you sperg

No. 16170

>>16169
Lmao as if this is a gotcha. The posts need to be deleted regardless if it's a serial evader.

No. 16171

Can "vendetta-chan" or just "vendetta" in general be red texted? It's so fucking annoying reading through a thread and seeing an anon post about literally anyone for any reason and then have some retard pop in the thread to call them vendetta-chan for no reason, just because they happen to like the cow in question or disagree with what's being said.

No. 16172

>>16171
idk there are vendetta chans though.
How many times has somebody made a thread on a nobody in their local cosplay scene. It hasn't gotten as bad as hi [cow].

No. 16173

>>16172
There are people with vendetta, but I'm talking about 2hen someone makes an innocuous post about someone doing something cringy and someone jumps on them saying they're a vendetta chan. It's ridiculous and overused on people who obviously don't have vendettas.

No. 16174

>>16170
Do not for a second think you're normal compared to her tbh, that thread is a dumpster fire and all posters are nuts.

No. 16175

please bring 2X back

No. 16176

Can a farmhand do something about the people posting Canyon's instagram stories talking about this site and "fighting against us" in the Tesah thread? It's extremely annoying, it's giving him the attention he wants, and it's obvious he knows people are going to post the screengrabs on the thread. I've seen the red text bans and I'm happy for them, but people are egging him on at this point by posting them and it's borderline cowtipping.

No. 16177

>>16176
it's very clearly canyon self-posting

No. 16178

>>16177
If it was him posting, farmhands would probably say something. It's obviously some retards who think they're being funny by engaging with him, when in reality it makes everyone else on the board look bad.

No. 16179

>>16178
Nta but I still think it's him. Tard probably DM'd his obnoxious following who think his "farmer tipping" is ~le epic trolling~ (kek) to post for him since his prior posts were marked. No one cares as much about Crayon as Crayon does.

No. 16180

>>16175
We’ll just have to wait for this shit admin to leave. Maybe then we’ll get a reasonable admin who actually listens to what LC wants.

No. 16182

>>16180
Or you could just post on asherahsgarden.net.

No. 16183

unpopular opinion thread is full of ana-chans sperging about kpop.

No. 16184

>>16182
Asherahs Garden is slow as hell. There's no reason not to bring 2x back, it'd serve as both a containment board so all the tranny lovers can easily stay away from it and a space for women who want to discuss GC or PP topics.
Why was it even deleted?

No. 16187

>>16182
No. I want to use the website I originally used before admin butchered it.

>>16184
>Why was it even deleted?
Because admin doesn’t want to see political opinions she disagrees with, so she decided to ban a topic that had been thriving on the site for a couple of years before she even became admin. There was even a poll where users overwhelmingly wanted /2X/ to stay and admin still removed it.

No. 16188

>>16184
It's pretty obvious at least one farmhand is hostile towards ANY feminist leaning opinions that aren't libfem. I'm not just talking about GC, but PP and FDS, too. Admin setup 2x so I'm going to assume they let the retarded tranny get in their ear. We just have to wait for them to 41%.

Forever interesting that admin is open to bringing the kpop cancer threads back but won't let us have a GC one. Admin has shown her ass.

No. 16189

>>16188
wait weren't farmhands and admin adamantly against bringing the kpopfag thread back?

No. 16191

>>16187
It was never deleted but you're not bright enough to have realized that.

No. 16194

File: 1599638157339.jpg (26.84 KB, 295x374, 4e4263f144f379611e50910cc24911…)

Can someone for the love of God explain to me what constitutes GC? I've been banned and unbanned twice now in /ot/ for what I thought were innocuous conversations with no political alignment or agenda… To tell you truth, I've no clue what any of the abbreviations >>16188 sited even mean.

Reposting to express my discontentment with being old and out of the loop. Pls take pity on me anons.

No. 16196

>>16191
>It was never deleted
Yes, /2X/ is technically still there if you type the URL in, but all of the threads are locked and it is an unusable board. So, yes, it was essentially deleted, dumbass.

>>16194
>explain to me what constitutes GC?
Anything that admin or the farmhands disagree with, lol.

No. 16197

>>16188
I saw a farmhand say that admin might bring back kpop on the new server but honestly kpopfags haven't bled out all over /ot/ or /m/ after their thread got banned and haven't started a meltdown accusing farmhands of being anti-oppas or whatever the fuck the equivalent of the tranny janny shit would be kek. The most they've done is ask a few times on meta. It's fucking wild that GC anons expect to be rewarded with a special board and all their threads back after not even being able to lay low for a bit after the threads got banned. Maybe if you all didn't act like such lunatics you would've had your shit back by now? But what do I know maybe being a huge pain in the ass is a mastermind strategy to win over admin and any future admins and I'm too dumb to understand it.

No. 16198

>>16196
That's not what deleted means.

No. 16199

>>16198
Why do you give a shit about my word usage? What word would you like me to use? Either way, all of the threads there are locked and the board is unusable.

No. 16200

>>16197
If you are going to ban gc, keep the same energy and ban lib fem spergs like this anon. Gc and rad fem was thriving in lolcow for a really long time and they were the fastest threads on the whole site.

No. 16201

>>16188
At least there's still the MtF cow thread on /snow/.

No. 16202

>>16201
An anon was banned in that thread for "GC sperging" a few days ago lol

No. 16203

>>16200
There was absolutely nothing libfem related in their post? I’m sure many people prefer for the site be slightly slower for a period of time over when it was faster but every other post gc/pp related. Having a thread move fast says nothing about the quality of the posts. The onision threads used to move fast too.

No. 16204

>>16202
There’s constantly posts here from people who somehow know what other gc anons got banned for even when the ban wasn’t redtexted. It’s obvious one of the radfem discord groups is targeting the site. Just go to asheherahsgarden.

No. 16205

>>16200
>really long time
it was less than a year

No. 16206

>Just go to asheherahsgarden.

No. 16207

>>16200
Honestly I'm okay with GC/PP being banned so long as trannies and their defenders also get banned (which they generally do.)

No. 16208

>>16187
It wasn't even because admin inherently disagreed with GC ideals, it was because she had profiled the GC posters as wealthy white Karens "expecting to do shit for them free of charge" and constantly accused her of being a troon which she apparently has a strong resentment for. She said it herself. I can understand her viewpoint because for example the GC subreddit was full of those types but still it's annoying that a topical issue gets banned because of a personal bias that isn't even true. I have never seen a farmhand or the admin "side with trannies" or showing libfem behavior myself and I don't believe the tranny janny rumor because even I as a GCfag hate the archetypal white-bred tradthots hating troons simply because of their association with gay people.

>>16204
>It’s obvious one of the radfem discord groups is targeting the site.
This is the most reaching tinfoil I've seen on this site so far.

No. 16210

please just lock vivadrag’s thread. there is no milk, she’s literally just in full self destruct mode and anons are feeding into it and fuelling her. it feels like it’s crossing lines now that old photos of her now deceased bf/fiance have been posted.

i know historically, the thread subject dying is the means of closing the thread, but since she just tried to kill herself according to screenshots from her mom’s facebook ITT + freshly dead boyfriend, that seems close enough. maybe i’m just getting too soft for this place but idk. farmhands, admin, i think this thread’s open status genuinely needs to be reconsidered.

No. 16211

>>16210
That and the WKs continuing the argument are bumping the thread which is only attracting more people. I'm not admin, idk what should be done, but staff definitely need to be notified.

No. 16212

>>16208
There's 0 reason to be offended being called a tranny on a site where you are completely anonymous. None of us know what she looks like. This is exactly why admin isn't fit for the role. She already made the site a laughing stock by posting her self-harm scars to prove she doesn't have man hands or some other dumb shit.

There's definitely some fuckery on the janny end, but it seems to be kept to /ot/. I saw some screenshots there of bans that were beyond retarded though.

No. 16213

>>16212
>She already made the site a laughing stock by posting her self-harm scars to prove she doesn't have man hands or some other dumb shit.
KEK do you have a screenshot?

No. 16214

Please just ban Anisa as a topic altogether, including the twitch general thread. There is absolutely no milk.

No. 16215

>>16213
Seconded… What the fuck kek. This has got to be a joke. And to think we were hanging shit on the pulltards extra curricular activities…

No. 16216

>>16214
If you hate the twitch thread so much just ignore it, or contribute the content you want to see.

A roommate turned out to be a stalker sabotager, false rape allegations from multiple egirls, managers fired for sexual misconduct - this isn’t milk?

No. 16217

File: 1600000359482.jpg (302.28 KB, 988x1144, 1595731984562.jpg)

>>16213
>>16215
nta but here, it was in the funniest posts thread on /ot/ as well

No. 16218

Are there plans to mark Canyon's posts in the Tesah thread? He never sages and uses poor grammar so they stand out but it would maybe make him go away. He's terribly annoying and attention whoring. And he keeps self posting a picture of his purple (?) penis.

He also threatened lc with legal action or he was "trolling" us about that.

No. 16219

>>16217
this was posted all over kf and the chans, too. image if null pulled this shit we would be laughing our asses off at him.

Do jannys just make up their own rules now? I feel like sometimes I'm posting on the mean girls website and they just redtext you if they don't like your opinion kek it's so frustrating. this is why i post less here lately. i read the rules and stick to them but it doesn't seem to matter

No. 16220

>>16218
Seconding this. I feel like he's been acting up enough the past week alone to be deserving of having his posts marked.

No. 16221

>>16194
GC = gender critical
FDS = female dating strategy
PP = …peepee(?)

No. 16222

instead of bringing back the general kpop thread it should be brought back as the bashing thread like it used to be

No. 16224

Please put the Kvlogger and especially the Taylor R thread on autosage for a while. It's full of refugee PULLtards bumping it to sperg and nitpick about her weight and eating habits. Not even remotely milky. And the Kvlogger thread is just as stupid. If you put those threads on autosage, maybe they will fuck off and find another home.

No. 16225

>>16224
Leave the kvlogger thread alone, the korean kanadajin just got outed for being a stalker and posting on sock puppet accounts.

No. 16226

Can "pulltard" be redtexted? I'm all for calling out pull refugees when they're acting like sjw little retards, but ever since pull shut down whiny bitches have been calling anyone they disagree with or find annoying a pulltard and it's it's the stupidist deflection instead of just disagreeing or calling them a retard like the old days.

No. 16227

>>16221
PP = pinkpill

No. 16229

>>16226
Anons have always called people pulltard here. Yes, granted the frequency has increased but that aligns with the frequency of sjw/race nitpicking bullshit since the site went down. I feel your pain, but we've already had troon/hi scrote banned, what will be next? I would report for derailment/infighting and move on lest our vocabulary get smaller and smaller.

No. 16230

>>16229
Eh, you're probably right. I just think it's become easy too overused since pull closed down, to the point that it's not even funny anymore and I'm assuming 80% or the anons bring called pulltards aren't even from pull

No. 16231

>>16226
Lmao because there's not enough dumb shit to get banned for on this site.

No. 16232

The lolita general is yet again filled with people whiteknighting cows. Almost every cow that gets posted gets defended these days

No. 16233

>>16226
I'm not generally one to throw out that word but those threads were basically dead until PULL died and how suddenly they are full of the same nitpicky bullshit that PULL had. Correlation.

No. 16234

>>16222
if the mods are going to bring it back, agreed. the amount of fangirl/twitterfags storming the general thread bc it "wasnt just critical" was obscene, but honestly cc's kpop thread seems to be generating traffic so maybe kpop should just not come back here

No. 16236

>>16233
Legit. Ridiculous photoshoppers became X2 more active and the Sarah McDaniel thread has been necroed among others. Coincidence? I think not kek.

No. 16237

I'm just gonna say that I think Kpop should remain banned. If it's brought back, not on /m/ please, or make it be autosaged, thanks.

No. 16238

Why bring back kpop threads when it was those retards that attempted to change this entire board's culture? I had no issues with the kpop generals until they started crying about other threads and their content being whatever -phobic they pulled out their ass that day. They can stay gone.

No. 16239

The kpop thread was full of autistic, sperging idiots who, despite multiple warnings, could not keep their autism contained to their own thread and let it spill out onto every other thread on every other board. I vote for no kpop thread.

No. 16240

Can brittany venti be a banned topic in shoe threads? Any time she's brought up, the whole thread has to be derailed with anons either claiming she's selfposting which I don't doubt or having to sperg about her looks/body.

No. 16241

>>16216
>>16214

Why is it that every time someone asks for Anisa to be a banned topic that the only counter is "don't like it? Hide the thread lul"

>A roommate turned out to be a stalker sabotager, false rape allegations from multiple egirls, managers fired for sexual misconduct - this isn’t milk?


So not Anisa herself? Are you gonna also tell us that Post Malone, whom was in a video with iDubbbz, harassing journalist is milk?

No. 16242

>>16239
>spilled out into every other board
when? where? lies

No. 16243

>>16238
This. K-pop faggots leaving was the best thing that happened to this whole site. Never bring that thread back please.

No. 16244

>>16241
Valid point anon. I think people only bother to use that argument because putting effort into arguing with someone trying to control discussion is pointless.

No. 16245

>>16241
It's also hilarious because if you actually read the threads most people are transparently only into her as a topic because it's the only cow you're allowed to nitpick to death with no punihsment. I don't get why that is the case, but it is.

No. 16248

>>16241
Because the thread isn’t bumped and saged, so the people complaining are constantly checking in but not contributing

> So not Anisa herself? Are you gonna also tell us that Post Malone


Maybe if you READ THE FUCKING THREAD there are posts that aren’t about Anisa. Maybe you’re the one with an obsession?

No. 16249

>>16240
lmao not only did they let the sperging about Venti go on, they redtext someone talking on-topic right after, then removed the redtext when anons called it out. The fucking jannys on this board kek

No. 16250

>>16249
The ban was from a new jani still familiaring themselves with modding, it was removed since it was questionable. It happens, shitty bans get handed out, that's what the appeal function is for. If you have a question or a complaint about a specific ban, please ask in /meta/ instead of the thread itself. It was only by chance that this one was spotted and removed.

No. 16251

a cow named shasti was caught posting about other cows in the left thot thread, itd be amazing if mods could reveal their post history

No. 16253

>>16251
Unfortunately she deleted her post before we could grab the IP so we'll have to do some combing through the thread. Thanks for the suggestion, we'll take a look.

As for Canyon since some anons are curious, we are keeping an eye on the thread and keeping track of his IPs now.

No. 16254

>>16158
The cc kpop thread is very active lately so just go there

No. 16255

I wanted to apologize to the mods for the natural hair post I left in Celebricows yesterday. I got banned for derailing, which wasn’t my intention. I thought I kept it pretty neutral to some extent, so maybe I should have saged. Again, I am sorry.

No. 16256

>>16255
They don't care. Just don't reply to 5 day old posts that have nothing to do with the thread topic

No. 16257

>>16255
wait why the fuck did they ban you for that? your post was normal?

No. 16258

Can y'all please consider making the incessant sperging about BPD and accusations of other anons having BPD a bannable offense? I'm so tired of seeing this shit in every thread.

No. 16259

>>16258
I didn't stop tranny, or scrote, so I doubt BPDfag will be any different. It's sad watching our vocabulary shrink because tard anons can't conceptualise a different opinion from theirs.

Also can mods mark Babivampire's posts in the egirl thread? She's literally sitting there refreshing the page, and as a few other anons theorised she's probably talked mad shit about other egirls. There's potentially a lot of milk to be found there.

No. 16260

>>16258
>>16259
lmao every time someone gets called a scrote/anachan/bpdfag/tranny they come here to complain. It's just board culture get over it.

No. 16261

>>16259
Agreed about Babi. Can her posts please be marked? She's deserving of it and I don't see why not as she's repeatedly ban evaded and made herself known

No. 16262

>>16259
>It's sad watching our vocabulary shrink because tard anons can't conceptualise a different opinion from theirs
We don't even need to ban words, just derailment and infighting will suffice. Idk why farmers are obsessed with censoring speech this way.

No. 16263

>>16259
something needs to be done about that thread. i checked it at 9am and it’s been a full 13 hours and they’re STILL fighting, it’s fucking insane

also can something be done about the people spamming about how shayna looks like an MTF every time a pic of her is posted on the thread? it was funny at first but now it’s multiple posts almost every day talking about how much of a tranny she looks and not lending a single thing to the thread and it’s getting mad annoying

No. 16264

Does anyone know why old Taylor Nicole Dean threads keep getting bumped to the front page of pt? Just curious

No. 16265

Derailing about bisexual shit on the pixielocks thread and tinfoiling on the Micky Moon about a catfish sperg

No. 16266

>>16263
“ha ha, that woman looks like a troon” is so fucking boring and it’s in every thread now

No. 16267

>>16262
I agree with you anon, that's actually what I was getting at (idk if that came through in my post).

No. 16268

Please put the Taylor R thread on autosage. It is full of obvious PULL spergs and those who are insisting on arguing with them. There is no milk and neither group seems capable of integrating and not bumping the thread. Add in armchair psychology, ludicrous tinfoil hatting, and inexplicable rage and you get a thread that should be nuked from orbit ( and that is only the part you can see without opening it)

No. 16269

>>16258
Why are BPDfags so sensitive over being called out as what they are?

No. 16270

File: 1600602669783.jpeg (356.03 KB, 2663x599, 0AA6457E-5C4F-4100-86A6-7E00B2…)

Can you delete the nasty ass pornographic child art in the salty artist thread?

No. 16271

>>16268
Seconded. That thread was pretty much dead before Pull went down and now it's full of salty bitches sperging about her weight. Girl is boring af and her being an ana-chan isn't milk imo.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]