>>2487435>I'm not even a suburbanite. I live right in the middle of the city centre.Yeah, I get what you mean. I brought up suburbanites because when I was living in downtown cities, I'd work and study with people commuting in from the suburbs. I found that the suburbanites were the first to jump to defend any negativity re: homeless. I found that they were so blinded by ideology that they couldn't comprehend that the majority of the homeless in Canadian cities are voluntarily homeless and that they are mostly violent criminals. I could say something like, "gee, I hate that I have to walk by 3 hobos shooting up in public to get to the Loblaws," and they'd go on a monologue about how addiction is a mental disease, how the homeless can never be at fault for anything, about how the system is unfair, etc., etc., they could never just be like "yeah ikr lol fuck them" like my neighbours in the city centre. Since the suburbanites didn't experience life in a city, but they only understood it through the lens of ideology, there was a major dissonance for them on what the homeless
should be, according to social media, and what the homeless actually
are, according to personal experience.
>Carney shouldn't even be viewed as 'new,'It doesn't matter to the majority. The majority of people are stupider than you could even imagine. They don't know who Carney is, they don't know what the Century Initiative is, they don't know what the WEF is. They don't care about any of that. What they care about is the colours and the faces. Liberals are red and Conservatives are blue. Carney is new and Pollievre is old. That's genuinely what it boils down to.