File: 1717593557265.jpg (110.64 KB, 744x379, cow-using-computer-3.3.jpg)
No. 78430
File: 1717593591903.jpg (72.43 KB, 500x342, 1717580310681.jpg)
sorry cowball!(do not post cowballs)
No. 78434
File: 1717596055685.jpeg (58.77 KB, 260x312, IMG_1120.jpeg)
>takes long deep breath
Mods suck so
baddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
No. 78448
Can someone do somehting about the constant nitpicking of her food and ana tinfoil in the Taylor thread? It's getting out of hand.
>>>/w/327827 Anons are nitpicking a meal with veggies and chicken and fighting with anons about it if you don't agree.
No. 78452
File: 1717605546018.png (78.05 KB, 666x230, unpopularopinions.png)
the influx of summerfags is so apparent in the unpopular opinions thread and I wish farmhands would moderate it more. anons venting about how they want to nuke the middle east has been going on for fucking days now. it’s repetitive, dumb, and annoying. they’re just circumventing the racebait ban on the technicality that muslims aren’t a race. I’m not saying this because I love the the ~religion of peace~ but it’s clear what’s happening, and moderation has been inconsistent.
I think the reason why this is such popular rhetoric among our young zoomie friends here is because of how overwhelming pro-palestine protests are at high schools and colleges currently, such that you’ll be called a genocidal zionist if you don’t join in, so they’re lashing out against the herd here, but it’s obnoxious and reeks of underaged behavior. if farmhands continue to not moderate the inflammatory posts like this, lolcow will become no better than /pol/ where anons are constantly jerking each other off in edgelord competitions.
No. 78458
>>78452"if I wuz…"
into the trash
No. 78459
>>78451First of all, the post you linked is already in a thread of redtexts.
Second of all, mods should stop banning posts showcasing her ana. They used to ban them as "tinfoil", now that it's obvious she is 'dieting', they ban them for "nitpicking". Where in the rules does it state that mentioning a cow's ana is against the rules or a nitpicks? Discussing cows and their bullshit is literally the purpose of the forum lol
Third of all, the post is pointing out that she's substituting regular rice with chickpea rice because it has less carbs. Downthread there's a post about her latest story stating just that. And guess what, mods already banned it too, thanks to your reports.
No. 78462
>>78456When will you dumb fangirls realise that an unnecessary, restrictive diet is also ana, not just not eating at all. Taylor fears carbs like the plague, it's not normal. Pointing that out is not nitpicking.
> a big bowl of rice, chickpea, and chicken with veggiesShe herself said it's
chickpea rice and that's what was the topic of discussion. Learn to read.
No. 78464
>>78463Do you mean yourself or Taylor lol because, no, none of those can be read as "sarcastically".
What I 'read' though is that you're pressed that Taylor's "healthier than vegetarian diet with real protein" (lmao) does not fool others into overseeing her obsession with dieting.
No. 78469
File: 1717608063271.jpg (87.2 KB, 600x549, edgelord spotted.JPG)
>>78467
You are so embarrassing lmao
No. 78475
>>>/w/327826 The pic is not not about the food it's about the upcoming vlog. Taylor's mod is as retarded as her wks/fangirls.
>>>/w/327837A tinfoil?? lmao if anything it's a derail. Does the mod need spoonfeeding from previous threads?
>>78465Lmao mods are not known for overmoderating the thread for nothing (see above).
No. 78478
>>78472Because she said so kek. I’m not even trying to be mean, and I have nothing against her beyond finding her spergy, but if I screenshotted her posts from both threads you would see exactly what I mean
>>78474That’s not why
No. 78485
File: 1717616196902.gif (Spoiler Image,394.85 KB, 500x500, 1717612149226.gif)
Cow balls should not be banned, they're cute
No. 78490
>>78488I'm kind of annoyed the janny banned the anon who was translating for us. Regardless of the age information, there are some other things I wanted to ask her opinion on.
But there's no real tinfoil either. Taylor admitted having an ED in the past at some point, she just denied it for a long time up to a point and then admitted she wasn't healthy. Now she's obsessed with going carbless. If I post a screenshot from today (not yet posted) where she talks about carbs, will I be banned? It's literally her actual words about cutting carbs.
No. 78495
File: 1717620216723.png (209.55 KB, 816x869, ban.png)
Can farmhands clarify wtf is 'on topic' for the quarantine cultural impact thread? There have been a bunch of redtexts over the last few days responding to clearly on-topic posts to the point it seems like one of the mods just doesn't want the thread to be active.
>2 days ago someone brings up the lack of trust in medicine and doctors>talking about that isn't directly about COVID, take it to the tinfoil thread>OK>someone starts talking about how people became aggressive and angry online since 2020>respond to that post, get a ban because 'this isn't the thread to talk about COVID'>even though it's literally a discussion about a 'cultural impact' of COVID i.e. people's aggressive antisocial behavior that started during quarantine + changes to social media censorship during that timeThe thread description is "Regardless of the actual number of deaths or illnesses, the pandemic had a lasting impact on cultures and the political landscape of the world. The pre-pandemic times feels like a distant era now, This includes changes in the economy and the radicalization of many individuals, and I believe we will soon start witnessing the consequences of these impacts." so the post that got banned about people acting radicalized seems exactly on-topic. Or should we just not post there because no matter what we're talking about in that thread we'll get banned?
>>78493Lol sorry I use a vpn so I didn't think about that but I changed it
No. 78496
>>78495basically it means dont sperg about the vaccine for 2+ days over hundreds of posts. which is what you were doing and why you got banned for it kek. your post even has the "post too long" thing b/c you were sperging out that hard over the vax.
>Lol sorry I use a vpnso tired of this because it seems like the spergiest anons are the ones that use VPNs so they can ban evade whenever they want and keep on being retarded instead of actually learning from their ban. if you actually read the thread you'd see that most posts before your's were also banned for derailing b/c the infight was going on too long then, but instead of learning from that redtext and dropping the topic you kept at it. you walked right into the ban and now you're upset. just hop over onto a different vpn and continue sperging if that's all you're gonna do why even be angry about a ban if you can just evade it so easily?
No. 78499
>>78496The post that got banned wasn't about the vax in any way shape or form. If the problem is vax posts why don't farmhands ban vax posts instead of posts that aren't about the vax? I also didn't make hundreds of posts in the thread wtf. I didn't use a vpn to ban evade and I haven't posted in the thread since I just want to know what is 'on topic' in the thread since apparently 'random shit about how people don't trust doctors' is off topic, COVID itself is off topic, people getting aggressive since 2020 is off topic. There's only like 5 posts redtexted in the thread and only one is about the vaccine.
Two of my posts were banned one was about SSRI diagnoses and one was this one, what was I supposed to 'learn from'?
No. 78503
>>78501If you see other people in a thread getting a derail redtext for a topic in a thread, you should infer that you shouldn't post about the topic lest you be banned as well. It's really not that deep. You were engaging in a days-long infight about something retarded, so you got banned for 6 hours. Boo hoo.
>>78502You're the most autistic type of dumbass shit poster.
No. 78504
>>78503Yeah, but I didn't see anyone getting a derail redtext in the thread for what I was talking about. I got a ban like 4 hours after I posted my one singular redtexted post, the person who posted after me got redtexted. No one before me got redtexted. What's hard to grasp here?
Where should we post about the topic of 'cultural impacts of quarantine' if not the 'cultural impacts of quarantine' thread is what I'm asking?
No. 78511
>>78507That's literally not what my redtexted post was about though, read the screencap. I just scrolled through the whole thread and there are only 7 redtexts in the entire thread, 2 are for an infight about whether someone's area is still locked down, 1 is me recommending a book about depression diagnoses (banned for not being on the topic of COVID), 1 is about ozempic, 1 is some troll asking if someone has bad shits from ivermectin, and the last 2 are my post about people getting violent and the post directly responding to it. Maybe you should go scroll the thread if you're going to call me a retard who can't read?
Also the previous COOF thread has literally hundreds of posts arguing about vaccines and not being redtexted, I wasn't part of any of those conversations but even reading the previous thread doesn't suggest that talking about vax shit is a bannable offense.
No. 78515
>>78513Can you explain how talking about COVID cultural impacts on the COVID cultural impacts thread is derailing (derailing from what?) It is starting to sound like you're the mod that banned me for derailing and you just have something against people talking about coof-related shit in the coof-related-shit thread after trying to lie that I should have 'learned' from a previous ban about vax sperging that I never got.
I'm not trying to appeal the ban I just want to know what is considered on topic for the thread before I consider posting in it again since I'm such a conscientious lolcow citizen and don't want to do evil lawless shit on this anti-censorship imgboard.
No. 78516
>>78514I don't know what they're trying to insinuate. There wasn't anything posted in that thread that was bannable. At worst, the hashihime cg was
sus, but it was also used as an example of being bait.
No. 78520
>>78512The fujoshi discord they used to link here until mods made them quit it. They came from /cm/, /a/, and /jp/. When you see baity shitposts with subahibi, rance, persona, N, eva, shota, traps, or nitro chiral pics, it's one of them.
No. 78525
File: 1717625583277.gif (35.17 KB, 112x112, b8f3f945-06aa-4735-b755-b87a51…)
>>78486maybe we could have a cowball love containment thread in /m/?
No. 78527
>>78490That's why I always switch to phone data before posting anything in Taylor's thread. There's such a high chance of a ban no matter what you post because of the fangirl mod. Ridiculous.
Drop the links to the forum posts and I'll post translations in her thread if there's anything interesting.
(admitting to ban evasion) No. 78539
>>78538?
Have you been following the discussion about shotafags taking over the fujo thread or
No. 78548
What is with anons shoehorning in non-cows when it doesn't even involve the cow? Ozy isn't even posting about Moo.
>>>/pt/935040 There's no reason to update about him alone if Moo isn't involved. It's just another scrote.
No. 78569
>>78566>SFW shota As if, all of the posts I've seen that could be considered "sfw" were still vile. Lusting over how "cute" the shota is, I don't understand what's with the double standard here with shota? Loli shit is posted only with censors and even sfw has to be posted in only critical threads and only to provide as proof. while shota spergs are going on how badly they want to see a child being raped ans how cute it is and its totally fine beacause its just a fantasy!
don't be fucking dense just go see the condition of the fujo thread even if they don't post nsfw of it it's clear what they're implying posting sfw from a porn genre doesn't make it not porn anymore.
No. 78570
>>7856999% of anime characters are underage. Shinji and kaworu are 14 and i dont see anyone reeeing about them. Also yaoi is infested with ''
problematic'' stuff like rape and abuse. Just learn to differentiate reality from fiction. I dont know how such sensitive people end up becoming weebs, go watch the office like a normalfag.
No. 78571
>>78566They were literally whining about boycotting a game because it
didn't have sex scenes of a 13 year old in it just the other day. Lusting after young boys is NSFW whether you attach an image or not. And the sexual nature is implied by the very fact it gets posted in the yaoi thread.
No. 78574
>>78536ofc you won't see rancefag since she's permabanned from lc and if she announces herself she'll get her posts deleted.
>>78542Admin made a poll last year about it. I can't remember it perfectly but it was something like, all lolisho must be spoilered, nsfw heavily censored and it has to be related to the milk.
No. 78577
>>78574>all lolisho must be spoileredApplies to images
>nsfw heavily censoredApplies to images
>and it has to be related to the milk./m/ is an offtopic board. Inapplicable.
No. 78578
>>78575I'm pretty sure it was about all lolisho, here I found the post.
>>57339The new rule regarding shota and loli is "Discussion and images should only be permitted if it is related to milk, and NSFW images must be heavily censored. All images must be spoilered." This will be added to the rules once exact wording has being agreed on between staff.
No. 78584
>>78579I don't know, I just remembered the poll and linked it.
>>78580>>78581You both should read the entire post.
No. 78590
If mods are insistent on not enforcing the shota rule can you at least make a containment for them? It's getting obnoxious at this point.
>>78589The age is irrelevant, it's how the character is drawn (proportions and specific shota tropes/tells mostly)
No. 78591
File: 1717687367074.jpg (130.13 KB, 850x850, sample_05bf372f7960120ea1122a2…)
>>78589age doesnt matter, if it has short shorts ITS A SHOTA. I will never stop laughing at the schizo trying to claim this fucking roidpig is a shota kek.
No. 78593
I think the no lolisho rule should really only apply for nsfw because of the gray area. Like
>>78588 said, there are anons here that consider Kirito a shota. But also /m/ already has a no nsfw rule.
>>78590A containment thread might work, but I don't think mods will go for it. Even if it's just a thread about posting cute anime boys.
No. 78596
>>78588>>78589Read the entire post by Admin
>>57339She explained what a shota would be and would not be in general terms.
No. 78601
File: 1717690010349.png (13.39 KB, 1168x167, Banned!.png)
>>78598this is the ban message I got for posting that Hashihime cg so I'm guessing me discussing it was okay but posting that image was not.
No. 78605
>>78601Why are you and other anons trying to be dense about this? NSFW art, of characters 18 and under, doesn't matter if you see their design to be 18 and older or under, if it is canon 18 and younger you need to spoiler NSFW images. If they are clothes, it's fine, but must stay in containment.
It's not a fucking hard rule and literally makes perfect sense. If anyone is spamming images of shots right now, I guarantee it is shitposting. Normal users know these rules, not nitpick and fight everyone explaining them including the link to the admin post. The trolling needs to be moderated heavier, this is stupid.
No. 78609
>>78601Yeah I guess next time either don't post it
although I think that image was warranted considering it was an example of a cg used in hashihime to showcase the shotabait or heavily censor it and spoiler it just in case.
>>78605I mean the image was just a nipslip and something I wouldn't consider nsfw, but I suppose just censoring all under 18 characters works. But also nsfw art at all isn't allowed in /m/ so any nsfw images posted should be censored and spoilered on /m/
No. 78613
>>78452Summerfags are also destroying the yaoi thread.
>>78505Agree.
No. 78640
>>78638Posting shota is the only edgy thing ever, but the OP image of a guy slicing open another guy's arm is fine.
I don't even think there's an issue with the OP image and found it extremely retarded when the mods tried removing it a few weeks ago, but it's pretty clear every fujo is a bit edgy.
No. 78648
File: 1717698929657.png (622.93 KB, 828x691, 01.png)
>>78646She’s also the person who made that hamas x jew art. Not edgy at all
No. 78655
>>78654She's gross and obnoxious. she posts pissing fetish art everywhere like a retarded unsocialized autist. At least the shotafags post sfw cutesy art, which is miles better than the gross shit she posts. She posted her pissing fetish art unspoilered on the art thread recently
>>>/m/387251 if you are going to draw degenerate shit at least be good at drawing
No. 78662
>>78636bitch i have been here since 2016. i survived the kiki chimpouts. i used to make ops for onion and shoe threads. i browsed mystery.jpg's post history in horror as i saw her agree in response to my posts. i've left lc and relapsed at least 6 times. i spent half of my teens on lolcow and i have nothing to lose or gain anymore. i'm not going anywhere, i will stay on this shitty dingey til it sinks.
also, i'm not a furry.
No. 78663
File: 1717700881412.png (50.09 KB, 720x344, Screenshot_20240606-140304~2.p…)
>>78660>In response to someone saying they don't know where is a good site to post about BLjust Ctrl+F lolcow
https://desuarchive.org/a/thread/266920637/#q266981984Its happened several times before this but I can't be assed to go dumpster diving, it's been brought up in a previous meta complaint a few months ago here where someone was advertising it on /jp/ as well.
No. 78669
File: 1717702157262.png (285.83 KB, 871x843, 1000012102.png)
they're attacking >ntyfag now because it's all true btw. they're faggots who kept posting about lolcow on /a/ and /cm/ bringing in some of the biggest autists on this side of the spectrum who plague /m/ and /ot/ now, and they shilled their shitty discord in the fujo thread until they got banned for it.
dumbass shit and funposting are dead, they couldn't stop baiting and fighting with the antifujos instead of just ignoring them, now they're still spamming unfunny shitposts everywhere and shotasperging after that troon-rigged election disaster hellbanned it, animecore/webcore 4chan newfags are up there for the most insufferable type of newfags to exist.
>>78666you can go through the fujo threads and see links to the discord in question. mods started deleting them when the shilling got out of hand, but some (dead ones) are still up
>>>/m/316192 it's picrel discord owned by someone claiming to like all of the things the /a/ newfags keep spamming, here and 4chan. someone said rancefag was in there but i don't know whether that was true or not, i didn't pay much attention to the drama with her.
No. 78676
File: 1717703148932.jpeg (547.03 KB, 828x1415, IMG_4114.jpeg)
we should have a rule against furfaggotry
No. 78678
>>78673>you asked how it relates to discord and I providedlrn2read. it isn't discord drama, i wouldn't be posting if it was. it's to outline how the discord is connected to this.
>>78674yes, newfag. you wouldn't know because to you this is just the silly girlboard to thirstpost about anime boys and own da moids.
No. 78680
>>78677There's a reason why pull always called us
toxic. They weren't wrong, but look who's the last one standing haw haw.
No. 78686
>>78681>why do oldfags want this site to be about bullying women so badly?because to put it bluntly the site was created for bullying women and gurg and nothing will top the days before it lost the plot and became female reddit.
>you would be the first in line with your weird piss fetish and schizo postsi'm not screaming about my love for piss from the rooftops to make sure everyone knows how edgy and cool i am. i dropped a spoiler one time, oopsy, maybe we need to enact a sitewide piss ban now like what happened to shota.
No. 78688
>>78685Nta but check the posts
>>78541 linked
>pedoposting>baity 4chanspeak>NxKaworu posting in betweenThis type of thing has happened in past fujo threads. There's also the picture of the crossdressing boy from Subahibi that someone keeps reposting and the discordfag has him as her profile picture.
No. 78690
>>78681because this site was built about cyberbullying.
faggots who come here exclusively to blog about their lives are insufferable
No. 78693
>>78686>i'm not screaming about my love for piss from the rooftops to make sure everyone knows how edgy and cool i amBecause nty isn't edgy at all and you never mention it?
>>78688Okay. I was still the only one posting anything that might have been inappropriate yesterday and even so multiple anons chimped out after someone else simply said shotas are cute. The issue isn't "baity 4chanspeak" it's moralfags like you not knowing to ignore posts you don't like while being into things that are just as degenerate.I hate the subahibi sissy posts but it doesn't matter if she's posting or not the thread will just turn to shit anyway
No. 78702
>>78700there's a gazilion sites where you can blog about life, mental health, anime and nigels. there aren't many sites built around making fun of cows.
/ot/ is way active and attracts shit users who then complain that lc is built around cyberbullying uwu
No. 78715
>>78714she also posted her pissing fetish, uncensored again, in the art thread
>>>/m/387251 its funny she seethes about shotafags when she has a more disgusting fetish she tries to shove down everyone's throat.
No. 78720
File: 1717718810216.png (Spoiler Image,423.72 KB, 828x725, HMsjnzb_ndnm.png)
>>78717This is fine I assume
No. 78736
>>78729This would actually be funny, but instead, I think mods should have two separate attention colors. Redtext is good, but what about green or blue for slang that is specific to newfags?
Delulu, IMO I think
ya'll should be there too, i can't think of others right now. I know I've seen other anons mention some, but that would be fun.
No. 78739
>>78726This is the truth admins don't want to hear.
Just look at this simple issue turned massive infight: the fujo thread had a good resident cow and instead of politely gawking (and reporting unspoiled pics when needed) anons can't stop sperging and trying to drive her away. It's over for cow culture. Almost the same thing happened to homunculus100.
No. 78740
File: 1717743073243.jpeg (736.12 KB, 1170x1142, IMG_5057.jpeg)
>>78429Why am I the only one who was redtexted for saying that mood was decent smh
No. 78749
>>78740Ah sorry nonna this is my fault. I made a report saying all of the replies UNDER this post is infighting as you capped here
>>78741 I guess they didnt read what I put so sorry about that
No. 78752
>>78703>>78708I'm asking
them to check it, you idiot. but i guess the mods are fine with Gene pretending to be a chick modding for this site.
I mean what harm can it do for you people to actually check my claims? Why does this board /meta/ even exists when we keep begging you to do your job and you just keep banning the people trying to get you to get off your lazy ass and mod?
Oh well, I tried.
No. 78757
File: 1717768412245.jpg (591.35 KB, 1080x1804, Why is anon retarded.jpg)
Is this the new way for anons to try to bypass nitpicking from mods, by adding in their dumbass comments to the photos and then posting them instead?
No. 78765
>>78757I find it neat though, it's easier to understand which comment op is replying to, instead of posting multiple times with separate photos and replies, or citing each comment individually.
>>78759Doesn't mean it's the same anon lol The anon you linked sperged about Tom's age and Chinese forums and kept freeing even after the discussion was over. This one seems different, at least to me.
And how do mods detect ban evading or samefagging in the first place if I constantly get ban messages of other farmers when using a vpn? If they can't tell who's posting, how can they know if it's a ban evasion or not?
>>78764And others just scroll by if they don't like the discussion. At this point jannies bans everything - ana discussions, filler discussions, plagiarism discussions, infertility discussions etc. What are we
allowed to discuss? Taylor's beauty and incredible talents?
Also what happened to the rule about abusing the report button, because Taylor's fangirl are surely busy checking the thread regularly and reporting every single post.
No. 78773
Not exactly a complaint because it was a short already-expired ban and all, but why the hell did this saged post
>>>/snow/2001622 get an "already posted" ban when the point was not to post the same pictures again but to show other anons their context, which they were wrong about? They were saying the cow hid the pictures when in reality she posted some herself and actually replied to the others, is it because I said she wasn't ugly? Kek the egirl thread has some weird jannies, you should consider getting people who aren't cows themselves to look over it
No. 78774
They are the same photos
>>>/snow/2000340Just a different format.
No. 78776
File: 1717789958647.png (18.13 KB, 648x346, nyaposts.png)
>>78774Yes, and they being the same photos
with her replies is the entire point. This is what was being said in the posts I replied to. Is lolcow so low on data space that including the pics with her replies counts as ban-worthy?
No. 78792
>>78782She has never completed any training with Nymeria as a service dog and has a history of lying about her animals being service animals. No one needs to spoonfeed you.
Service dogs are not treated the way Stef treats the dogs she has brought to conventions. Why are you defending this retard?
No. 78794
>>78781In the world where /w/ is for milk regarding cosplay, lolita, and weebs. The animal shit in her thread has always been off topic and annoying. Anons just get desperate to talk about something when she isn't doing her skinwalks.
>>78788We've discussed it many times and most people agree it should be merged back into /snow/. But the admins refuse to put up a poll or anything about it, and really haven't communicated with the user base about anything in quite a while, so it's not happening.
No. 78803
>>78797I was under the impression that /w/ and /snow/ were split up because /w/ users (especially Venus anons) were shitting up threads in /snow/. I wouldn't mind a merge back because /w/ is pointless now that Venus was moved to /pt/
I don't think I'd personally like it if we reverted back to /b/ like 7 or so years ago, I think /m/ has a chill vibe, and /g/ is unhinged anons thirsting over moids. I think /ot/ tends to get very repetitive with similar threads popping up (specifically off my chest/confessions/vent). Imo having it the way we have it now there's less of a risk of cross-contamination of retarded anons shitting up the /m/ threads
No. 78810
Double post
>>78700Yeah exactly, the anons complaining about this are probably PULLfags. Like for example KF doesn't ONLY have the cow subforums, they also have the offtopic one(s).
No. 78815
File: 1717862262669.jpg (402.28 KB, 1058x1212, Vendettafag.jpg)
The googledoc anon is using this thread as their personal army and cannot stop stalking the cow and posting the doc everywhere she posts and manipulating any milk currently and future wise. This is ridiculous. When there's a thread that's clearly a vendetta to keep it going, shouldn't it be closed? This user keeps coming back and repeating their same schtick. They are personalityfagging now at this point, letting everyone know that they are the maker of the googledoc every chance they get. I know the post has already been banned, but this is such a blatant case of a vendetta.
If anything it should be autosaged, not locked, so that they can't keep bumping the thread for their vendetta.
No. 78818
File: 1717873098084.jpeg (Spoiler Image,142.31 KB, 828x303, IMG_4150.jpeg)
ban all tradthots
No. 78820
Should Pixielocks and Shayna just move to /pt/? Like I get they’re supposed to be the /w/ and /snow/ mascots or whatever but their threads just end up clogging each board’s catalog. They both (especially Shayna) have their face all over banners too and Shayna literally has
>>>/shay/ dedicated to her when iirc now other cow has a hidden board dedicated to them (/pt/ stopped being about just Pixyteri so I don’t count it)
No. 78839
Male in Moo's thread
>>>/pt/935267 a whole crybaby post about men discarding women after 30
No. 78847
>>78836It's about Tom's minute of fame, not about food, retard. Learn to read before hittimg the report button.
And when it comes to nitpicking, at this point it's miss janny nitpicking and banning every post that has food in it. The food pics are not about the food itself, they are proof that she is ana and actively dieting despite being skin and bones. I'm glad that anons post those because then if someone dares to mention her ana they won't be banned for tinfoiling. (Who am I kidding. they will be banned anyway)
No. 78855
>>78849Just came here to ask.
>>78854>How do you know it's thd mod? Anon could've deleted it herselfit had been there for hours
No. 78861
>>78849>>78854Since when are mods deleting posts in cow threads (I'm not talking about cp etc.)? Is redtexting not enough? Although there was nothing to redtext in the first place. If there's any more proof needed that the mod is a braindead fangirl, this is it. Couldn't have been more obvious.
>>78859Seconding this.
No. 78865
File: 1717959198851.jpeg (77.57 KB, 587x202, IMG_1203.jpeg)
Let’s see if the mods will find this and ban it for racebaiting. If they don’t then they have no business banning people for talking about other races, these asian mods are so self-hating and inconsistent
No. 78876
>>78875Pretty sure the mods can tell. Admin has mentioned people being detectable before which would follow some tinfoil I read last year about device-specific stuff. Might not be the IP that gives it away in that case.
Also some users do have a habit of coming back and posting the same thing they got banned for like the micky w thread
No. 78890
>>78889I'll throw this out here to anyone passing if you weren't here when
that thing would spam porn, cp, and excessive schizo takes meant to annoy women, he always referred to "the tranny janny", and I mean like 100s of posts. So if you're online and you see even one post that says those 3 words in order or any odd, slightly word salad-y variation of it, it's him. He may find a way to drag one or two of his only schizo internet 'friends' here to do some pathetic attempt at a raid, but its also very likely most if not all posts are actually his. He's severely mentally ill and abuses drugs while sitting at his pc all night and day, he has all the time in the world. He takes thousands of screencaps and shares them in dumb discord servers claiming he's owning Le Ebil
Terf Dykes when most of us are neither of those things. If you were here for his prior spamming (where thousands of posts were deleted) you'd be able to identify the weird fake-trad way he talks.
No. 78901
File: 1717987644035.jpeg (391.61 KB, 799x1073, IMG_4021.jpeg)
fuck it I guess circumcision is the word of the day
No. 78928
File: 1718043929410.jpeg (90.87 KB, 735x740, IMG_1321.jpeg)
a lot of the red texting recently is pure autism. No social awareness of what’s a joke or not, or taking things seriously that are clearly not meant to be taken seriously. There is an epidemic of genuinely autistic Jannie’s and I will not be silenced
No. 78944
>>78935I didn't say pasta dish, I said her finances. I'm talking about the tax situation post. Completely unwarranted ban.
Also Mikan is nowhere near Eugenia level, either way fat or skin it's unflattering and the anons were all dogging on the designer, not calling Mikan fat yet they were banned for being an ana nitpicker. Would the mod be less
triggered if they referred to it as skin popping out?
No. 78945
File: 1718070231096.png (100.42 KB, 976x938, comparison.png)
>>78944Am I wrong to think this is the same thing? Aside from the doxxing redaction. Are they just unhappy with how it was typed? Both posts have estimated earnings, fee breakdowns, rent, etc. Why is it ok in Shay's thread but not Pixie's?
No. 78950
>>78945Bc most of it is tinfoil, you guys don't actually know what she's spending and what on like Shay. Shay actually posts prices of shit and rent bc she begs for it online. Jill however, we have an anon saying where she lives and trying to get that be the truth of rent and other bullshit.
Can you guys just be normal in the threads???
No. 78951
>>78950Personally, a cow's finances doesn't really interest me nor do I find it funny when people go to extreme lengths to state the obvious; "X is bad with money or is fucking poor"
like in the case of people getting DSP's bank information to learn what he'd been spending his money on but, the redtext was mainly for the doxxing info than the cost breakdown. Janny's right tho, anons in pixie's thread have been their own breed of autistic for years now.
No. 78952
>>78951It wasn’t because of the dox, that was only updated when I just checked it to post the screencaps. Initially nothing was redacted and it was just “autism” (and it was that for a while) which again isn’t warranted if the Shay stuff is ok. I honestly wouldn’t care as much if it didn’t seem like certain behavior gets ok’d in certain threads and banned in others. Wht is that? In general Shay threads are way worse than Pixie’s too
>>78950The doxxing was redacted, I won’t say what it was but it was related to her bf, not where Pixie lives. She also posts pictures of bs she buys all the time, I don’t see how it’s different. You don’t know how many subs Shay has, or what her rent plan cost is, it’s also “tinfoiling”
No. 78957
>>78933Yes, but there's almost no moderation, so at least 40% of every thread is shitposting, blogging, and derailing. Their cow summaries are also often horrifically outdated, and even jumping between highlights doesn't work because most of the highlights are unfunny jokes. that's the problem with having one gigantic thread. I went back and re-read the Jillian threads where she went to Tokyo for the first time, and it was pretty easy to navigate because the threads summarize milk and index previous threads.
>>78948I'm getting really tired of the blatant homophobia. It's clearly a bunch of trads using """man hate""" as an incredibly thin pretext to say shit that would get them banned anywhere else (and used to get them banned here!). Idk about you guys, but the pride threads in /ot/ used to be for complaining about spicy straights and corporate nonsense, not dancing on the graves of people who died of AIDS. I've been here for seven years and I distinctly remember a time when that sort of stuff would warrant redtext. It's not "defending moids" to be creeped out by anons who sound like Anita Bryant.
No. 78960
>>78953Because the moderation there is noticeably bad and extremely overdone compared to /snow/ and /pt/. It's extra weird because of how slow the board is and this just kills it even more, as if the mod wants it to die. /w/ is the only board where we're not allowed to have saged non-milk conversations about the cow and it's just like… why.
>>78879I like this idea. The current board metrics don't make sense. Why is Momokun is /pt/ even though her drama is mainly cosplay related, which is what /w/ is for? Why is Venus in /pt/ when her drama is mainly weeb related? Why is Pixielocks in /w/ when she doesn't cosplay or wear lolita, and isn't much of a weeb? Etc
No. 78963
>>78960Way to out how new you are. If you don't understand what /pt/ is why are you criticizing it?
>>78961It wouldn't even matter if it was, anon doesn't know what /pt/ is for.
No. 78964
Tbh it’s funny to see newfags call for /w/ and /snow/ to merge considering /w/ only split off a few (? I no longer remember how long) years ago. I still think they should be split. It’s only less active because most older /w/ cows have wisened up and cleaned up their act enough for people to stop airing their dirty laundry, and people don’t care enough to make threads for potentially milky weebs/cosplayers. That and a few threads on snow could go on either, like the egirl thread.
>>78963It doesn’t make them wrong to think that /w/ is overmoderated, that’s only been within the past few months.
No. 78970
>>78966This and needing to know where they live needs to stop. Anons hinting at cities, complexes, roads.. like why the fuck are anons trying so hard to do? Of course w is being held to stricter standards regarding this anons have tried pinpointing:
Lori
Sharla
Chris Abroad
Belle Delphine
Pixie
Taylor R
Why are we doing this??
No. 78992
>>78990Same. I’m begging you, cerbmin.
Please add a search function to the catalog. And add the catalog link to the top of the screen finally.
>>78991>Use the "find in page" tool on your phone This doesn’t work for me.
No. 79008
File: 1718259456724.png (348.99 KB, 750x744, m3005.png)
I'm going to say this again: the homophobia is getting really out of control, particularly in /ot/. It's clearly gone beyond just normal moid hate and into straight-up bigotry. It's only a matter of time before anons stop qualifying it with "moids" and just start trashing gay people of both sexes. There's also just been a lot of blatant partisan political bullshit lately (unrelated to troons or gender). This shit ruined Kiwifarms, and it'll ruin LCF if it isn't nipped in the bud.
If it absolutely has to be allowed, it should be contained to 2X. /ot/ has the highest density of retardation on the site, and I think that the gender critical thread there may have emboldened the political refugee trad types who lurk there.
No. 79019
>>78593People really need to stop conflating nsfw and porn or nudity.
>>78591 is nsfw as is most of the shit on /m/ but that pic wouldn’t be breaking /m/ no porn rules.
No. 79055
>>79052This. Tbh why have them at all? The threads are never
valid complaints or just simple discussions about annoying aspects of pet culture, it’s weirdos talking and fantasising about people’s beloved animals dying.
Literally no better than the scrotes on r/childfree and the fuck uh things they say about kids
No. 79079
>>79077Hey mods you deleted my comment in the crossfire of this
triggered male and I'm not a "
triggered male". Please don't make dissenting opinions from other women a banable offense. It is a genuine question why women don't pursue STEM more often and I am curious how many here do. Please stop deleting comments there's no problem with or at least give a reason for why you deleted them.
No. 79082
>>78429I hate that nonnas keep using the /snow/ western animation cow thread for general cartoon discussion.
Would the mods redtext me if I started (very) passively aggressively reposting their random webcartoons to the /m/ thread that they apparently aren't aware of?
>>79034I don't think there would be enough nonnas interested in that for a whole new board. That probably would be fine for an /m/ thread.
No. 79084
>>79068racebait is bannable whether you want it to be or not. you should leave the board entirely if you can't adhere to rules.
>>79069kek
No. 79086
>>79076You're not the first or last person to request a new non-cow board. Anons have requested a travel board, a craft one, an anime one, etc etc. You guys all want female 4chan which this site is not and was never meant to be. Admin has said themselves they want to keep this site focused on cows.
Kiwifarms is a shithole, why would we want to be like them in any way?
No. 79092
>>79091>>79088>>79086So sick of bootlickers. No one asked
you. No one gives two fucks what you think. Anons are allowed to ask for whatever the fuck they want and they either get it or they don't, take yourselves out of the admins ass for just a solid five minutes and ask yourself why you're even here.
No. 79093
File: 1718481244329.png (10.94 KB, 896x155, Screenshot 2024-06-15 154944.p…)
This seems so insanely nitpicky. I don't even remember what post this is referring to so I'm assuming it was a while back
No. 79099
>>79097ban messages usually show the post you were banned for. post the whole ban message and redact your IP if you want to prove me wrong. the screenshot here
>>79093 clearly doesn't show the whole message
No. 79104
File: 1718559536785.png (64.61 KB, 950x370, 1000014984.png)
>>79103i miss this admin the most
No. 79106
File: 1718590136810.jpg (113.59 KB, 800x800, woman-has-headache-woman-stres…)
>>79103It's almost amusing how every admin starts out strong and then quickly gets tired of us and abandons us. Same pattern every time.
No. 79111
>>79110probably should've saged that.
also I don't support them I was just wondering if it was an official rule. It probably should be so theres no confusion for people who don't know. less of a headache in the long run.
No. 79124
>>79123it was good to have a
terf board but it was ruined by rightoids and blackpill spergs. rip
also the newfag is still bumping up his shit thread
>>>/snow/2005540 No. 79126
>>79122namefag (plural namefags)
(Internet slang, sometimes derogatory) A person who uses a name online (either their real name or a username) as opposed to posting anonymously, especially on the 4chan community. quotations ▼
Verb
edit
namefag (third-person singular simple present namefags, present participle namefagging, simple past and past participle namefagged)
all my posts are anon and all my cows names are linked to their public social media. go find something to do with your life
No. 79141
>>79124No, it was always cancer. Even keeping it hidden was not enough. We don't need it. We never needed it. This is a cow board for dramu and sperg, not whining about troons and men. Take it to ot or fuck off.
>>79127GEE WHAT A SURPRISE WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THAT COMING
No. 79142
File: 1718726273103.jpg (141.32 KB, 1787x107, Untitled-4.jpg)
How is this not racebait? Once again the black girls thread gets a free pass to be racist and mods allow it
No. 79143
>>79106cerbmin didn't start out strong because she was lying about everything.
>there aren't 3 admins, just one>there are still multiple unofficial discord servers where she communicates and all the mods hang out>she did not get rid of mods on the shaymin teamthat and she's not being transparent about anything, including the current mod team beef that is ruining the site.
No. 79150
>>79141oh boohoo the mean anons don't like your nigels.
retards seething about muh terves shit up threads just as much
>>>/m/393454 No. 79151
we should have a “worst parents of lolcow.farm” award this year. the top contenders would be laur trueman from the lillee jean thread for ruining a whole person
>>>/pt/935962 and freyja/itsblackfriday from the altcows thread for abandoning her special needs child during surgery so she can gallivant around the world going to goth festivals with money she scammed from her followers
>>>/snow/1942859 with an honorable mention to binkieprincess/tangerinemommy for selling abdl porn and keeping pedos in her follower list even after she had an actual baby, who she won’t stop posting uncensored pics of even though the only reason she has a following is her diaper porn
>>>/pt/864707 No. 79168
>>79163It's so fucking annoying. I dont want to see random life updates from a cow in the photoshop thread. This user(s) have taken over the thread. None of the other PS threads were like this and required photoshopped images only. This update crap about her life, her clapping back, the constant uploads of her ugly boyfriend and their hijinks isn't milky to a photoshop thread. She needs her own or to be moved.
Not to mention the vendetta around her.
No. 79169
>>79106i mean can you blame them? people always get mad at the admins but never look at why they often give up. this is the pattern i've seen every time over the years:
>new admin(s) comes in, honeymoon period commences>everyone is excited, gushes over the new admin>"i just know you're going to be better than the last admin!" goo goo gah gah>new mod team goes heavy on the banning/moderating (justified or not)>"why the fuck did i get banned for this shit? fuck you admins! rot in hell!">admins and mods try to explain their reasoning for the bans, it's always the same thing…>stop infighting, stop unsaged sperging, stop policing other anon's opinions, stop reporting posts in bad faith, so on and so forth>reeeeeeeeeeeee it's not fair reeeeeeeeeee this place is no fun reeeeeeeeee>mods expose the loudest anons for being very recent posters, underage twitter refugees, or literal mentally ill schizos>said anons start spamming /meta/ and the admin emails with abuse>the worst ones start posting cp and gore in retaliation to try to get the boards taken down by the feds>"wow, this place has really gone downhill!">admin has a breakdown, goes silent, stops responding to emails and thread posts>eventually goes awol>suddenly announces his or her resignation>anons start infighting in even more>"the state of lolcow rn"; "this place is dead as fuck, i wish they would close the boards"; "can we just have (whatever board or thread everyone is bunched up in)? i don't really care about anything else. i just want what I want.">rinse and repeat No. 79184
File: 1718843585027.png (32.29 KB, 1063x105, Screen Shot 2024-06-19 at 8.29…)
Farmhands or admin can you guys actually start talking about how to solve the ban evasion problem? It's so much extra work for the moderation team to continuously ban the same few bad eggs that shit up the site like in picrel. If you actually came together and made a plan to fix this problem it'd make moderation way easier for all of you + a better experience for normal anons. It's so tiresome seeing the same dozen people post their bullshit over and over and over again because the current ban system isn't effective like it was before.
No. 79187
File: 1718851796601.png (218.65 KB, 637x1646, posthellweek.png)
>>79173>>79186admin posted the stats they tracked in the post-hellweek thread, but they’re pretty different from what the other anon found online. I assume either the site isn’t accurate or it’s tracking bot views
No. 79191
>>79187I'd say the mods tools are more accurate than a random tracking site. Maybe posts vs views? Lebanon feels weird to be the 5 biggest group. You'd think it would be Germany or something.
In the top 5 word searches that led her all of them are variations of lolcow farms except "emiru handbra". I don't think I've see her here enough for that to be right.
No. 79192
File: 1718864986243.jpg (202.42 KB, 1440x1963, 49888347904232710.jpg)
>>79191It varies based on which traffic website you look at, which is interesting. US consistently has way more users than anyone else though.
No. 79197
>>79175Oh please as if the sperging is only about poor gang rape
victims. They're just used as a shield for racebait
No. 79202
>>79182Burritomin was also paranoid but not without reason. Josh wanted to take over LC and Elaine kept trying to dox her.
>>79201Women should be allowed to talk about what is happening in their own countries in their respective threads. This includes difficult topics as long as it doesn't descend into racist insults. The issue of mass immigration has having a major impact on European politics, anons should be permitted to discuss this in appropriate threads.
I find it interesting that no one cares about what gets said about trannies on this site but there's always someone whining about immigrant moids being discussed.
No. 79204
File: 1718910506337.png (469.7 KB, 512x521, german_stats.png)
>>79203>because immigrants aren't the problem but moids areImmigrant moids are still moids so why are they immune from criticism?
>asslick white moidsWhere is anyone asslicking white moids on this site? Pointing out that in Europe immigrant men commit more crime against women is not "asslicking" white moids, it's what is happening.
No. 79209
File: 1718916826097.jpg (28.13 KB, 310x363, GNVDAVPWoAEwxCV.jpg)
>>79204>reddit spacingcheck
>fake statistics from twittercheck
>not my nigel rhetoriccheck
you don't belong here. go back to chasing doughy, balding, WN ~save europe~ flaking smegma covered dick on telegram or whatever.
No. 79210
>>79208>disproportionate Israel and Lebanon views While it
could just be inaccurate/unreliable data, the discrepancy might also be from bot views by Mossad (Israel) and Hezbollah (Lebanon) that flag whenever certain subjects are mentioned for intelligence gathering. If it was actual posters, it would be reflected in admin’s stats. Just my guess
No. 79214
>>79207Which is why I specified that using racist insults should not be allowed and remain bannable. We are permitted to insult and criticize trannies and men in general so why should discussion of immigrant moids be an exception?
>>79209>reddit spacingLearn what a paragraph is and how quoting on image boards works before accusing others of being a redditor, newfag.
>fake statistics from twitterIt's the German government's own statistics and a female politician was fined for posting that exact image.
https://modernity.news/2024/05/07/german-politician-fined-6k-for-pointing-to-governments-own-stats-on-rapes-by-migrants/
>not my nigel rhetoricTake your meds. Posting factual information from the German government is not defending white men. Criticizing immigrant men is not defending anyone, just the same as criticizing trannies is not defending men that aren't troons.
>you don't belong hereAnti-immigrant retoric has always been present here because mass immigration of men has always posed a threat to women.
>>>/pt/14139Anti-immigrant post from nine years ago.
>scrotefoiling>anyone speaking out against violence and sexual crimes towards women on a women's website is in fact a moid>>79213>You wouldn't ask a plumber to bake a cakeBut LC allows political discussion. There is an entire board dedicated to feminism and female politics.
No. 79218
>>79215It was suggested here
>>79201 that any criticism of immigrant men should be banned.
>>79216>Rule 7>Do not instigate or engage in race related arguments. (racebaiting)The rule specifically states "arguments and racebaiting" not discussion. If all discussion of race based topics were to be banned, several threads would need to be deleted. Discussion of immigration has been a permissible topic in dedicated country threads and /2X/ for years.
Admin even made a statement on this
>>>/meta/59152>The term “rapefugee” sounds like its straight from /pol/ which is why those posts have resulted in temp bans. However, we understand that rape by refugees is suffered by women, so women here may feel that “rapefugee” is an accurate term that rapist refugees deserve to be called >>59479. Global Rule 7 states: Do not instigate or engage in race related arguments. (racebaiting). Clearly, we’ve allowed race related discussion, but please keep it civil between users.>>79217Sure
https://www.bka.de/EN/CurrentInformation/Statistics/PoliceCrimeStatistics/2019/pcs2019_node.htmlThe PDF you want is the crime and statistics report. I haven't posted a direct link because it leads to a direct download.
No. 79220
there should be a rule against furfaggotry
>>79216agreed. feels like half the active threads in the first pahes of /ot/ rn are people sperging about immigration. it's just boring
No. 79226
>>79218kek you didn't even try, the report you linked isn't even the one that was used to make the disinformative graph from alt right twitter you posted. you don't even know what the fuck you're talking about. you're also embarrassing yourself hard trying to larp as a farmer.
>Discussion of immigration has been a permissible topic in dedicated country threads and /2X/ for years.why don't you just stay in your tradtard nazi containment thread on /2X/ then? oh right, becahse no one fucking cares about or wants to hear your racist scrote-parroting bullshit, which is why you annoying freaks always invade /ot/ and shit up the threads on there with it instead, to invite the moids in and ruin the board. please realize literally no one wants you here.
No. 79229
>>79174My hang up with all of this is that there are a million places these anons could go online if they wanted to bitch about "rapefugees." Why here, especially when this site has a bunch of rules around political and race posting? Why not go somewhere that doesn't have those kinds of restrictions?
Frankly, I'm sick of "moids" being used as a blanket defense for rhetoric that would be ban-worthy otherwise. Apparently the rules went from being "no race sperging and no politisperging" to "no race sperging and no politisperging UNLESS you tack 'male' or 'moid' on the end." Like if you feel the need to specify that the moids you're talking about are gay or brown, clearly your issue isn't
just with them being moids, it's also with those other identities. And complaining about those other identity groups is not the purpose of this site. The only exception to that is trannies, and that's because trangenderism isn't actually an identity group, it's a new-age religion full of cows.
No. 79233
>>79226>the report you linked isn't even the one that was used to make the disinformative graph from alt right twitter you postedThe statistics in that document were used to make the graph. Are you the seething retard that doesn't understand statistics presented as fractions and percentages?
>you're also embarrassing yourself hard trying to larp as a farmerYou are outing yourself as the newfag by calling for censorship on an image board. LC is a "free speech friendly" image board. This was reiterated by the admin in the post I already linked
>>>/meta/59152>LC is free speech friendly and is in direct opposition to self-censoring speech.LC
The screenshot is the /ot/ sticky from when Burritomin was admin and it states
>LC doesn't pander to your ideology>>79229>Apparently the rules went from being "no race sperging and no politisperging"Then why not ban politics from LC? LC is a lolcow website.
>The only exception to that is trannies, and that's because trangenderism isn't actually an identity group, it's a new-age religion full of cows.Trannies are an identity group because they are a group of people that identify as trans and transgenderism is very much part of identity politics. On most of the internet, what gets posted on LC regarding trannies would be considered hate speech. Trannies being cows is an entirely different issue to anything political. Political discussion is banned on /snow/ because cows aren't political, yet the MtF and FtM threads exist as well as threads for individual troon cows. Discussion of the politics of transgenderism is permitted on /2X/ and /ot/. No form of moid should be exempt from criticism.
>>79230>they aren't even interested in milkYou aren't a farmhand, so you have no idea what threads or boards other anons are posting in. This is an inane statement because you have no way of knowing that your assumption is correct.
>equating their mental illness>European women wanting to discuss the dangers of mass immigration are mentally illJust admit that you hate women already.
No. 79235
>>79233>Then why not ban politics from LC? LC is a lolcow website.It literally is, it just hasn't been enforced in the last year or two. Tell me you're a newfag without telling me you're a newfag.
>Trannies are an identity group because they are a group of people that identify as trans and transgenderism is very much part of identity politics.For our purposes, it's something they choose to be. Functionally, it's a fandom that churns out cows. People have been redtexted in the TiM/TiFs threads for writing walls of text about gender politics.
>No form of moid should be exempt from criticism.No one is saying moids should be exempt from criticism. They're telling you to follow their rules as they exist on /ot/, which are very clearly "no race, no politics." If you want to get around that, feel free to bitch about moids
without bringing up their race.
No. 79236
File: 1718945609913.png (47.19 KB, 1636x186, LC-admin-2015.png)
>>79235>It literally is, it just hasn't been enforced in the last year or two.Once again you are the newfag. Politics has never been banned on LC, if it was there would be no /2X/ board or feminist discussion on the site. There have been many attempts to limit race based discussion, the screenshot is from 2015.
>Functionally, it's a fandom that churns out cows.Transgenderism is a political ideology. The threads on /ot/ are called "gender ideology hate thread".
>They're telling you to follow their rules as they exist on /ot/, which are very clearly "no race, no politics."No such rule exists on /ot/. If politics was banned from /ot/ there would be no country threads, no pride threads and no gender ideology hate threads. The issue of race discussion with regards to immigrants was already clarified in this post
>>>/meta/59152>Clearly, we’ve allowed race related discussion, but please keep it civil between users.There is no rule that bans discussion of immigration.
No. 79244
>>79229The funny part is that after a few replies when they get comfortable, they drop the “moid” part and start racesperging about the women too trying to justify it as
>w-well they’re the ones marrying and procreating with these shitskin scrotesIts never actually about moids only or crimes done by immigrants
No. 79245
>>79236Doesn't change my original question:
>Why not go somewhere that doesn't have those kinds of restrictions?You can list exceptions all you like, but that doesn't change the fact that the site broadly limits that type of discussion.
No. 79252
There's an anon who has been infighting and derailling in the Consoomerism thread for days now
>>>/ot/2058970we can't even discuss the videos posted there anymore
No. 79253
>>79251femcels. call them
femcels. and theyre seriously ruining this site because they always sperg out because they cant fathom other women on this site cant stand them and the basement dwelling neet tendencies. any semblance of rationality with them istg
No. 79270
File: 1719072821249.gif (50.32 KB, 261x124, autism_text.gif)
>>79243>umm actually my source is correct and yours is wrong>easily available one google searchAnd yet you're not posting the source
>you're actually retarded>like some boomer falling for pop up ads>you can't even bother to learn the facts>unintegrated cow behaviour>dumb bitchHypocritical for someone that is unable to visualize data from written statistics.
Let's do some basic high school math and see what the PDF actually says
Section 2.2 of the PDF
>rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death>german suspects 2019: 5,175>non-german suspects 2019: 3,014>total suspects in 2019: 8,189The total estimated population Germany in 2019 is 84,000,000. Different sources state different numbers between 83,000,000 and 85,000,000 for the total population of Germany, so I'll take the middle amount. It's not going to make a significant difference to the overall calculations on this scale.
Germans make up between 74% and 77.5% of the population of Germany depending on if repatriated Germans and their children are counted. Non-Germans are 22.5% of the population.
77.5% of 84,000,000 is 65,100,000
22.5% of 84,000,000 is 18,900,000
Out of 65,100,000 Germans, 5,175 were suspects in cases of rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death
Out of 18,060,000 non-Germans, 3,014 were suspects in cases of rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death
Let's calculate this as percentages.
5,175 is 0.008% of 65,100,000
3,014 is 0.017% of 18,060,000
In conclusion the graph posted here
>>79204 is correct in it's assertion that non-Germans commit more crimes involving rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault at a higher rate than Germans.
Section 3.2.2 of the PDF further elaborates on this.
>total reported cases of rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death: 9,426>total suspects in cases of rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death: 8,189>98.9% of suspects were male (to the surprise of absolutely no one)Section 6.1 provides statistics on the
victims of crime
>30,723 people were victims of offences against sexual self-determination>92.4% of victims were femaleSection 6.2
>77.7% of crime victims were Germans>22.3% of crime victims were non-GermansSection 7.2
This section deals with the nationality of suspects
>total suspects 2,019,211>total non-German suspects 699,261The non-German population is 22.5% and is 34.6% of suspects. The German population is 77.5% of the population and is 65.4% of suspects. This once again confirms that non-Germans in Germany commit crime, including violent sexual crime, at a higher rate than the German population.
While there are no stated statistics regarding the exact rate of sexual crime of non-Germans by nationality in the document, the numbers provided allow for this calculation to be made. The graph specifically mentions Afghans as being particularly prolific at committing sexual crimes.
Section 7.2 features a table that breaks down the total number of suspects by nationality.
>Afghans were suspects in 29,981 crimesAfghans are 0.5% of the population which means that Afghans are 4.28% of suspects in all crimes committed by non-Germans
Afghans are suspects of crime at higher rates than Germans
Of 2,019,211 total suspects, 8,189 were suspects of rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death
The percentage of suspects of rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death is 0.41% of total suspects
0.41% of 29,981 is 122.92, 0.5% of 84,000,000 is 420000. This means that the percent of Afghans that are suspects of cases involving rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death is 0.029%
0.41% of 1,319,950 is 5411.80 77.5% of 84,000,000 is 65,100,000. This means that the percent of Germans that are suspects of cases involving rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death is 0.008%
The graph is correct in asserting that Afghans commit a significantly higher number of sex related crime than Germans.
Per 100,000 Afghans living in Germany 29 are suspects of crimes involving rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death
Per 100,000 Germans living in Germany 8 are suspects of crimes involving rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death
Afghans living in Germany are almost four times more likely to be a suspect in crimes involving rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death than native Germans.
In conclusion the graph is incorrect because it actually under estimates the amount of sexual crimes committed by Afghan migrants. The official statistics in the PDF released by the German government are more dire than the supposed "alt-right" propaganda from twitter.
No. 79272
>>79270Literally crying right now, how could this happen to Germany.
I'll say a prayer for it tomorrow.
No. 79274
>>79270who gives a shit
this is why politisperging shiuld be banned tbh, all it does is attract baiters and autists
>>79253femcels aren't real. it's just baitposters, rightoids and prob some scrotes.
>>79229you're so right. i've also seen plenty of anons us the same tactic to spout homophobia. they pretend it's just manhating about gay scrotes but they never mention straight ones and it quickly become clear theyhave an issue with homosexuality in general. the pride thread is a mess.
in general im just tiredof the influx of poltards shitting up /ot/ and /2x/.
the country threads and unopopular opinions are just 24/7 racebait and political infighting now, they're worse than dumbass shit ever was.
No. 79277
File: 1719080643658.jpeg (444.98 KB, 1125x2085, IMG_5416.jpeg)
>>79270picrel is the twitter thread the graph you posted originates from. as you can read, the reports used in ALL of the graphs posted in that thread, icluding the one you reposted here, are from 2016-2017, as in not the one you are refering to. you doubling down on this when you're blatantly wrong just cements what a fucking retard you are to everyone itt. the gif you attached to this post is extremely accurate kek.
also, just to quickly comment on this sperg, it
only mentions suspects, which means it's fucking useless in determining who or how many are actually getting convicted of these crimes, which means you cannot draw a conclusion about who's committing them, and yet that's what you assert several times, showing you have no clue about what you're talking about or the implications of the report. and alongside all that, there's a billion other things that factor in as to which crimes even get reported or for example which groups are more likely to be implicated as suspects. please acquire critical thinking skills and some general reading comprehension.
No. 79287
>>79286It's because of the "no redtext in /meta/" rule of thumb. I agree with you though, I think redtexting needs to become more common place on /meta/ because the random arguments and stuff here are so out of place. Why did someone feel the need to sperg about German immigration for 10+ posts itt?
>>79285I hate that so many retarded anons take the bait every single time. The Funny Caps thread is 100+ posts deep in a derail now because someone baited with a husbando picture. I don't get how some people can still take bait at this point.
No. 79290
File: 1719097241980.jpg (26.91 KB, 1512x185, heart.JPG)
not the anon who made this post but I thought the ♥ heart was allowed?