[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

Read the post-Hellweek thread for Hellweek statistics, Q&A and upcoming updates

File: 1699976547047.jpg (70.53 KB, 800x533, photomontage-cow-grazing-mount…)

No. 65391

This is a containment thread for meta discussion that doesn't fall into complaints and suggestions. Feel free to tinfoil or talk about the state of the site but try to avoid being too autistic.

If cerbmin needs to hear it, post it here.

NEW /meta/ THREAD: Site Updates Thread
>>63266

Previous responses to anons:
>>62774, >>62928 regarding moovie thread
>>62963 accusing other users of being moids
>>63136 explaining infighting from a handful of users

Previous threads, newest to oldest:
>>62751
>>60569
>>56933
>>53472
>>51182

No. 65401

File: 1700006485939.jpg (178.35 KB, 736x981, Miniature pony foal (1).jpg)

Not to be a bootlicker, but I've been here since oldmin and this feels like the first time we've had an admin(s) that doesn't suck. We've had many updates this past year in comparison to what we had before, even if some of them were small. I'm very grateful, I think lolcow has a good future.

No. 65428

>>65401
I agree, I know their trying their best but I just think they are very obviously understaffed at this moment.

No. 65429

requesting again that that Child at Heart" thread on /m/ be restored and why it may have been deleted in the first place
>>>/m/263042
https://web.archive.org/web/20230613160830/>>>/m/263042

No. 65432

>>65401
I feel sorry for them having to stear this sinking ship. If anything happens to this place it's most likely going to be symptomatic of how cancerous culture/society has gotten as a whole.

No. 65437

>>65401
Agreed. I've noticed a definite improvement in how the site loads, so thanks for that admins.

No. 65468

I just wanted to let it be known that tiktok videos previously embedded has disappeared after the embedding update and each post that had been embedded with a tiktok video has been replaced with the text embedding error.

No. 65469

>>65468
It went away for me on desktop Google Chrome, not Firefox for some reason.

No. 65485

>>65469
It seems to be in my chrome

No. 65498

>>65469
See:
>>65400
For details on the limitations of Firefox (and other privacy-focused browsers) with regards to TikTok embedding!

>>65468
>>65485
Anyone having issues on Chrome, can you hard refresh your browser and see if the issue resolves. If it doesn't, could you either email (admin@lolcow.farm) or post your Chrome version numbers so they can be used for testing/resolving it? For transparency, our Chromium testing of the embed changes was done with Chrome version 119.0.6045.160.

No. 65500

File: 1700157750161.jpg (110.61 KB, 700x698, 1652179487410.jpg)

Thank you Cerbmin for the updates and for finally adding new banners!

No. 65501

>>65401
>>65437
>>65500


>>65429
Apologies for not getting to this sooner, we missed attention that was drawn to it previously. Fortunately this thread was created after I was able to fix the backups function, so it was fairly quick to restore. We are missing the full resolution of one image, so if anyone happens to have it, please email it to us (admin@lolcow.farm)
>>>/m/297106

We're looking into what happened to the thread now, and we'll make a post when the investigation is done

No. 65502

>>65498
Thank you admin! is there a way to embed instagram reels as well?

No. 65503

File: 1700160856604.png (1.98 MB, 1884x2048, LW4Kvqfa.png)

>>65500
Thank you so much, but yeah I'm curious of why that(and according to other nonnies some other thread) were deleted.

No. 65504

Wait what happened? Why are the TikTok embeds not working?

No. 65513

>>65498
My version which works is Chrome 119.0.6045.135

No. 65515

>>65504
and a few youtube links too

No. 65518

>>65504
>>65515
can you please post links to the embeds that are not working? it's not helpful to just state that some aren't working without making it clear which ones.

No. 65520

Thank you to admin for putting new banners in! It's been nice seeing all the new ones pop up.

No. 65521

>>65520
Also thank you for the other technical updates in the Site Updates thread, our admin are working very hard. ♥

No. 65528

>>65518
Some of them are in the current consoom thread in /ot/, there were plenty last time I checked

No. 65529

>>65520
and most importantly, super thanks for removing the daddy's little porkchop one.

No. 65530

is leftcows never being unlocked?

No. 65531

>>65530
Maybe we can unlock it when Amber’s book finally comes out? She narrated the audiobook too I cannot wait to pirate it

No. 65536

i'm sick of romanianon making her posts so obvious on the vent thread, she needs to integrate better. i don't care about occasional vents you can tell it's her, but today was too much.

No. 65539

>>65529
I still see this one

No. 65540

Can I ask to be perma banned from posting? I'm too addicted to this site it's ridiculous.

No. 65543

>>65536
Doesn't she literally have schizophrenia? It's impossible for her posts to be integrated when she's unfortunately not medicated and has a serious mental illness.

No. 65544

>>65540
Samefag, I especially need this IP permabanned if possible, it's my WiFi. Thank you(you'll be missed)

No. 65545

Can you ban the male in unpopular opinions thread that's calling anons cock sucking whores? This male has been posting for ages but you guys never even delete his posts even when you redtext him, it's suspicious as fuck

No. 65546

just wanted to say thanks to admin because I have seen a lot less CP in recent months. whatever you're doing is working

No. 65547


No. 65548

>>65544
Sweetest redtext I've seen.

No. 65550

>>65543
I thought it was BPD

No. 65552

>>65543
No she’s not schizophrenic, she doesn’t hear and see thing that aren’t there, she’s just traumatized and has the usual cluster of diagnosis that come with that as if it’s not a normal response to what happened to her (bpd, schizoid, histrionic etc —all the bullshit that gets thrown at women who were abused as a diagnosis with no real treatment except zombification when what they need is to be shown and believe that trust is possible between people, she may never trust people again though)

No. 65556

Gore in /ot/

No. 65557

>>65552
Doesnt she believe everyone is after her and she killed her cat or something? Visual Hallucinations aren't a must for a schizophrenia diagnosis, I'm a med student.
Also you don't know if she auditory hallucinations, she probably does given how she thinks everyone hates her - something that voices commonly say.

No. 65558

>>65557
Nta, but on top of that, she also believes that Gorillaz stole her ideas

No. 65559

File: 1700377291460.jpg (216.96 KB, 750x662, 1673819758685.jpg)

>>65558
nta but omg i almost forgot about that kek

No. 65560

File: 1700377316099.jpg (90.17 KB, 1125x435, 5.jpg)

lmao

No. 65561

>>65560
>>65559
>>65558
>>65557
Stop posting about your special interest here

No. 65562

>>65558
This is a sign of schizophrenia as well, as I said she has mental disorders you cant expect her to integrate unless she gets help.

No. 65563

Anon calling women cocksucker retards is back in unpopular opinions again.

No. 65566

>>65562
I don't expect her to integrate, I was just saying

No. 65569

why do mods keep autosagging the funposting threads? it wont kill them

No. 65570


No. 65571

>>65569
Why kill them? They need containment

No. 65572

>>65569
They can keep a tab open and refresh it. You know exactly why it's been autosaged since it was made.

No. 65573

>>65569
If it won’t kill the thread then why do you care

No. 65574

>>65572
no, i genuinely have no idea why it has been autosaged. do explain.

No. 65575

>>65572
Nta but the thread only started getting autosaged during thread #2 and once it was already halfway full. Like I could understand if it was autosaged when all the shitflinging was going on (surprisingly it wasn't saged during that time) but why after that once everyone chilled out?

No. 65577

Mods probably autosaged that thread to curb all the infighting in and outside of it. It's not hard to figure out.

No. 65578

>>65577
there was no infight on that thread though

No. 65580

>>65575
I don't know how you're being so oblivious as to the why.. They don't just un-autosage a thread the second infighting and shitposting is curved. Sometimes you need to wait a few weeks or even wait until a new thread. It's still a containment, just won't be bumped. The complaining regarding it not being bumpable is really telling of newfags and makes it clear it should stay that way.

No. 65581

>>65580
we both know it's because of a vendetta, the unpopular opinion thread is infighting general and it's not autosaged even though its the thread all trannies/moids gravitate to

No. 65583

>>65501
Following up on this, it would appear this thread was deleted during the same incident as the Moovie Night thread.

>>65569
We aren't trying to kill them. If we wanted to do that, we'd just ban them. The threads are autosaged because they were created by anons who were banned out of the Dumbass Shit thread for deliberately being disruptive and vastly increasing the moderation burden. The anons who now use Funposting were generating around 100 reports a day by themselves in Dumbass Shit. As long as you obey the global site rules and spoiler NSFW you guys can do whatever the hell you want in Funposting, but the threads will stay autosaged because of that. If you want to follow board etiquette, use Dumbass Shit. If you want to exist outside of society, you have your Funposting containment thread.

>>65570
This is great, thank you. We were able to fix the issue with this, all TikTok embeds should now all work again. If you find any more that look off, please let us know!

>>65536
We have spoken to romanianon and asked her to make her presence less obvious. She has agreed to try and integrate a bit better. We genuinely wish her the best!

No. 65584

>>65583
>The anons who now use Funposting were generating around 100 reports a day by themselves in Dumbass Shit
I'm surprised that they are allowed their own thread and didn't just get banned after that tbh. Very generous, hope it doesn't backfire.

No. 65586

>>65583
NTA but I really wish this applied to /ot/ as a whole. Unpopular opinions has been a disaster for weeks.

No. 65587

File: 1700422860154.png (327.59 KB, 563x586, D2258E13-5C25-48D6-96FD-9A6B9B…)

>>65583
based admin, funposters die mad

No. 65588

>>65583
>retards spam the report button
>umm ackshually you are the problem
there is no porn or infights on the funposting thread and the only reason it was made was so the retarded normalfags from the dumbass thread would stop sperging when someone posted something they didnt like. Are you going to punish the entirity of dumbass thread when someone posts something outside the rules too? i remind you they posted dead animals without spoilering even though they shit and cry whenver someone posts an anime boy unspoilered

No. 65589

>>65588
They were baiting and posting the same shit over and over again every day, but you knew that already.

No. 65590

>>65589
having a conversation about something the majority of this female-adjacent weeb board is into isnt spamming. If they ban horny women they should also ban the celebricow spergs who shit up the entirity of /ot/ whenever they develop a hatred towards celebrity, the unpopular thread has been unusable because its been invaded by them, same for the dumbass thread that has been nothing but sperging about celebrities looks and calling normal attractive women fat or ugly.

No. 65591

>>65583
retarded soft touch admin strikes again. all the "funposters" should have been perma'd, not given free reign to do whatever the fuck they want. they made a popular thread unusable for almost a week spamming yaoi, other threads would never get that kind of lenience. if admin is a fujoshit she should honestly kill herself

No. 65592

>>65588
You guys keep saying there was no porn/yaoi being posted in the funpost thread, but doesn't that prove what admin and other people have been saying about anons being purposefully disruptive in the dumbass shit thread

No. 65593

File: 1700426967288.png (47.13 KB, 2461x452, insanity.png)

>>65591
the thread wasnt unusable because of the yaoi, it was because you could not just switch to another tab for a few hours and let anons talk about what they talk, no, you had to start sperging and threatening to call the police or other unhinged shit. I dont know why the admins are ignoring that the infighter was an obvious moid calling women fish fingers and a-loging them

No. 65594

>>65592
yaoi was only posted after the infighters started calling fujos who were just discussing a vn fish fingers/fat/telling them to kill themselves, it happens every time an anon starts being annoying. It happened when people were complaining about isopods and sylvanian families too. Maybe if anons banned the obvious moid infighter instead of anons it wouldnt have repeated itself so many times.

No. 65596

>>65593
nta but
>the thread wasnt unusable because of the yaoi
Meanwhile
>go to dumbass shit, they’re posting yaoi, leave for a few days, go to dumbass shit, they’re posting yaoi, leave for a few days, go to dumbass shit, they’re posting yaoi…
>>65590
Why do you children keep acting like all women simply must be into yaoi? Yeah the celeb sperging is annoying but it’s a lot easier to glaze over than HAHA YAOI YAOI WHAT ANIME BOYS DO YOU WANNA SEE GET RAPED YAOI HAHAHAHA that kind of horny shit goes in /g/ which your kind refuses to use so this is what you get. I think you are a bunch of newfags trying to turn this place into fujochan 2.0

No. 65598

>>65596
>that kind of horny shit goes in /g/ which your kind refuses to use
See that just makes it obvious that they were baiting and refusing to integrate. When the dumbass shit/shitposting threads got too full of husbando posting, a husbando shitposting thread was started in /g/ and everyone happily went there to post among like-minded. There have now been 17 of those threads. But when a similar fujo thread was started in /g/ the spammers didn't want to post there. Hmmm

No. 65599

>>65593
>>65590
>>65588
Let it go for fuck a sake, it's been almost a damn month you autist. You even got your own thread to post whatever you want, no one else would've gotten such nice treatment after spamming porn and shitting threads, they should just perma ban you already

No. 65600

>>65596
>>65598
i have no idea what you are talking about, the funposting thread BARELY has yaoi. It was made because anons were tired of people starting infights instead of ignoring posts they didnt like.

No. 65601

>>65599
why do you keep lying as if lolcow threads arent easy to check? no one was spamming porn, someone posted a spoilered figurine and a retard started infighting calling women fat/ugly/fish fingers. It's not a coincidence /ot/ has more moid bait than usual lately.

No. 65602

>>65601
>why do you keep lying as if lolcow threads arent easy to check?
I could ask you the same thing, retard. There is porn at your thread rn

No. 65607

>>65599
>for fuck a sake
aww, I'm exhausted and read this in Mario's voice

No. 65609

>>65588
You're making yourself very obvious

No. 65610

What does it mean if someone gets banned for being a “vain bitch”?

No. 65611

>>65610
Wait, nvm. I think I figured it out.

No. 65612

>>65531
why has it still not been unlocked? a week or two lock shouldve been enough.

tinfoil but there is a white nationalist woman named victoria delarue who is or used to be a moderator here, she's a computer science major at u michigan, and whose ex boyfriend atom chetcuti who was a former troon was doxed by someone claiming he was a pedophile and while defending the indian groomer remilia milady maker ceo or whatever, they were the so called leaders of kaliacc and that was in an old leftcows thread, so they have a reason to want it down. her ex bf has ties to other cows too. if she wasn't a mod she certainly knew mods, other posters and frequented the old lc discord server. others may know her as yuno or a^3. it isn't news some subjects of that thread and people adjacent to it browse lc but just wanted to put that out there

No. 65613

>>65612
Where's your proof of them being a moderator?

No. 65614

>>65613
i don't have any proof which is why i added if she wasn't a moderator she was in sections of the server that were verified, but i recall her being mutuals with some old moderators so that was mostly speculation. but yes the old leaders of kaliacc were certainly involved with the community here and knew other posters. can't really share screenshots without it giving too much away unfortunately so i don't expect you to believe it, mostly just in case any other posters recognize the username.

No. 65615

Why did I get a tranny redtext for making a shitpost about Anya Taylor Joy in the punchable faces thread? It was a dumb joke and I’m not sure why it was taken seriously. The ban reason said “hi Stephen” and I have no idea what that means or who Stephen is. If you look at my post history it should be pretty clear that I’m a woman.

No. 65616

>>65614
Your tinfoil doesn't even make sense.

No. 65617

>>65616
it does if shes actually a mod. it's a tinfoil because there's no proof.

No. 65618

>>65615
I also got permabanned for infighting in the Reddit thread after being called a scrote. Admin and janny are retards. I’m not even appealing because that’s how little respect I have for them. Get a VPN and carry on.

No. 65619

>>65618
I’ve never even been accused of being a scrote on this website and I know for a fact my post history shows I’m not one, so I don’t get why the mod gave me a tranny ban randomly. It’s so weird.

No. 65623

>>65619
They don’t check your post history. The person you were infighting with probably reported you for being a tranny and they banned you without checking.

No. 65624

Unlock the leftcows thread it's been a month like wtf

No. 65626

>>65614
Is that who banned everyone in the Sam Hyde thread too?

No. 65627

File: 1700493103068.jpeg (51.75 KB, 319x410, IMG_1639.jpeg)


No. 65628

>>65615
>posts women in punchable faces thread
>gets surprised when he gets accused of being a man

No. 65630

>>65598
I just don't get why they can't use /g/.

No. 65631

>>65583
Thanks admina ♥ I found another broken embed from a year ago in the minimalism thread, not sure if it was YouTube or TikTok. >>>/ot/1243631

No. 65634

>>65612
why post their dox? also you got the edrama details wrong.

No. 65635

>>65634
Thank you, I've fixed cases like this as well!

>>65502
Instagram reels currently can't be embedded, but we can look into it as it is supported by Instagram

No. 65638

File: 1700521587084.jpg (959.29 KB, 1662x5354, romanianon and dumbasses in th…)

>>65583
>We have spoken to romanianon and asked her to make her presence less obvious. She has agreed to try and integrate a bit better. We genuinely wish her the best!
It didn't work. Go look at the vent thread >>>/ot/1780343 I'm not gonna clog the report queue with all this shit. what do the people replying to her expect? a bunch of be quiet romanianon/ it's romanianon/ log off comments is honestly just as annoying as her repeated identical vents.

No. 65642

File: 1700523184383.jpg (405.42 KB, 1079x814, 167754334.jpg)


No. 65644

File: 1700523519840.gif (2.32 MB, 480x448, dare.gif)

>>65640
>It's just me saying "my life is shit". "I'm being accused of things that are unfair" then a bunch of replies "calling me out" what the fuck am I supposed to do? I'm just talking about my life like everyone else. It's not even something cowish or funny.
So those posts calling anons "whores" and telling them to kill themselves in that cap weren't yours?

No. 65650

File: 1700536032018.gif (496.31 KB, 500x500, b8XZRoO.gif)

>>65641

No. 65651

File: 1700536124307.gif (323.67 KB, 480x288, pU71Qrs.gif)

>>65650
2D was my husbando in middle school

No. 65654

>>65628
What? Women are posted in that thread all the time

No. 65657

>>65654
That anon has been posting about her for a few hours and saying he only dislikes that actress because she's not pretty enough. I don't think women would say a conventionally attractive actress is ugly and should be punched because of that.

No. 65658

>>65583
You guys are so fucking stupid and dumb do you know not even a year ago she was a-logging about wanting to stab and kill people from this site for “rejecting” her and brainstorming about how she’s totally going to kill someone to relieve her angst. Yet you permaban and give the farmcow layout to anons after getting in the dumbest infights. Why not permaban the stupid Romanian since that’s what she deserves? She will never integrate get used to it!

No. 65659

>>65657
>I don't think women would say a conventionally attractive actress is ugly and should be punched because of that.
Have you ever met a woman? Have you only just started using this site? Women are fully fledged human beings and many are evil and horrible. Get used to it.

No. 65660

>>65657
Um are you talking about the discussion about her in the dumbass shit thread? That was like two days ago and no some anons were saying she’s unattractive and some were saying she’s attractive, but no one said she deserves to be punched because she’s unattractive. Anons were also talking about how she’s a shitty person and a nepo baby, why does that sound like it was all said by one male to you?

No. 65661

>>65660
Anon is stupid. Probably a larping scrote himself. Report.

No. 65662

>>65657
Twitter misses you, anon.

No. 65665

>>65658
I'm pissed that normal posters get banned over nothing or for shitty reasons and Romanianon can a-log at other nonas while the mods and admin just give her a friendly talking-to. She promised to integrate! bullshit. How did you talk to her, did you phone her up? Give me a fucking break.

Also, however, why are other nonas continuing to engage with Romanianon? Just ignore and report. She's never gonna change and provoking her seems like male behavior at this point (no, I don't think it's males who are provoking her own here, but it's just copying what males do to mentally sick ppl on other sites).

No. 65669

>>65665
>it's just copying what males do to mentally sick ppl on other sites
agreed, people just need to ignore it and stop shitting up the thread even further

No. 65672

>>65665
I think Romanianon does get banned, but she's admitted before that she IP hops

No. 65673

>>65672
Avoiding bans is way too easy on this site

No. 65675

>>65658
>>65665
The ban/appeals process can be used to facilitate a conversation. We extended to her the same courtesy that we have to other users who behaved in a similar way, which is one last warning before their posts will no longer be allowed here. She knows how to ban evade and permabans do not work (she's had many), so all of her posts will just be deleted.

No. 65686

>>65675
I can only imagine what these ban appeals looked like

No. 65687

>>65659
Usually people beating up and domestically abusing women and saying those women deserve it tend to be men, retard. %99 of incels think ugly women deserve to be abused

No. 65688

What is the original of the Spoiler pic? Sorry if thats a retarded question I've just always wondered if its a lc or something.

No. 65690

>>65688
It's the queen

No. 65697

>>65675
RIP to our sister who couldn’t integrate, wish her the best with all my heart.

No. 65698

>>65687
> Usually people beating up and domestically abusing women and saying those women deserve it tend to be men, retard. %99 of incels think ugly women deserve to be abused
Nothing like this was ever said about Anya Taylor Joy, stop trying to start infights. The punchable faces thread is filled with pictures of women who annoy lc users, it isn’t men posting them

No. 65699

>>65698
Anon kept saying anya wasn't even pretty enough, looked like an alien and that she deserved to get to get punched. Quit lying, if you think a woman deserves getting punched because she doesn't fit the Hollywood beauty standard which even other actresses can't fit without proper makeup lighting etc. you're as bad as a man. No woman thinks about punching her when they see a woman they don't find attractive, that's male behavior little incel.

No. 65700

>>65624
leftcows is one of the most popular and most frequently updated threads and is repeatedly being locked for extended periods over bullshit, yet there was a troon spamming cp for months, the threads he would post in didn't get locked and his posts were removed if cp or banned accordingly. we know the cows had a habit of checking it. either there's more going on, some bias and conflict of interest possibly affecting what we're allowed to discuss here or we have idiotic mods determining that the most retarded threads ever are allowed to exist doxing private randoms with no ties to any other cows, posts about teenagers and minors for idk being young and stupid, and photoshopping or badly done cosplay in and of itself as opposed to actually popular threads covering adult narcissistic micro internet celebrities with ties to groomers, ideologues and demonic homosexual venture capitalists. if shay is your cup of milk you get a whole shaynatorium to see a grown autopedophilic woman putting on a diaper for the umpteenth time but leftcows is locked for a month due to… higher influx from twitterfags and derailing about palestinians and israelis at the height of escalation over a month ago? who cares? why can't you moderate?

No. 65701

>>65699
No, what was actually said is that she’s a mean person who used to be a bully

No. 65707

>>65701
Stop pretending to be a different anon. Just because you got bullied in highschool doesn't mean you now have the freepass to call women punchable for being ugly.

No. 65711

>>65707
punchable face is a subjective term but it basically means they find that persons face annoying. she’s allowed to find whoever annoying looking and post them in a thread dedicated to that purpose she doesn’t need a ‘free pass’.

No. 65715

if namefagging/tripfagging is a bannable offence, why is it possible to do? is it not possible to use an imageboard format without it?

No. 65721

File: 1700675069318.png (4.09 KB, 638x185, 1700666028943.png)

could someone tell me what font this is? At first I thought it was someone's own font set up, but several other anons have said it's the default font for the website.it's a different one for me, so I wasn't aware.

No. 65733

>>65721
Whatever you set your font to on your computer/browser is what will show up. So, thats a you issue.

No. 65735

>>65715
It's a newfag trap. Why do you think Anonymous isn't pre-filled into the name field

No. 65765

>>65651
Me toooooooo nona good taste

No. 65773

>>65707
I watched the entire discussion play out, no one said that she needs to get punched for being ugly, stop making things up. I was never bullied and I’ve never said anything about Anya or anyone else being punchable, I just don’t like the fact that you created an entire made up narrative about why anons were making fun of her. People were saying her rich parents bought her career because she’s too unattractive to have become famous if she wasn’t a nepo baby, then an anon (you, I’m sure) started samefagging about how beautiful you think she is. No one ever said she deserves to be punched or “domestically abused” of all things you lying retard

No. 65787

>>65733
How is this an issue? I was just asking if anyone knew what font this was.

No. 65822

File: 1700752257021.png (8.47 KB, 461x122, 8b1a92ab7bba528af779919ab66093…)

>>65721
you mean the font or the way the letters look like? picrel doesn't have those pixels

No. 65906

>>65612
Huh that explains some things. Thanks for sharing! I do think it's funny that white nationalists will lean super hard into the anti racism shit and think that would give them a cover but they always sound so rehearsed and OTT about it. Too bad we can't talk in private about this, would love to know more about her

No. 65946

Honestly I'm surprised the leftcows thread was locked for so long, when tradthot had equally if not worse amount of baiting twitter troons/moids.

No. 65953

>>65735
Wait, do you fill in "Anonymous" into the name field?

No. 65955

>>65953
No lol

No. 65956

File: 1700835604798.png (6.77 KB, 292x36, Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 15.21…)

>>65953
No and that wasn't my point at all. Over the years a lot of anons have asked why we even have an email or subject or name field in the first place, like >>65715, and I feel like a mod or admin on the lolcord has said before that they keep those fields around on purpose because it's funny when a newfag enters their info. See crystal.cafe for example. They want to make it clear even to newfags that they don't need to enter anything. Meanwhile, on here, in the Quick Reply field it even says 'Name' as if you're prompted to put something in. So I see why newfags fall for it and I believe it's by design, that's all I wanted to say

No. 65988

>>65956
Oh ok, I misunderstood then kekk

No. 66005

>>65946
It shouldn't be locked, and it was one of the biggest threads on here. Get more farmhands who read up on the lore if you want better moderation I guess?

No. 66030

>>66005
Lore doesn't take precedent over unruly posters.

No. 66042

>>66030
It doesn't have anything to do with lore. Locking a thread because mods can't handle the traffic is bad moderation, or are they understaffed? I don't see the application up anymore. If they do have enough mods, then why is the thread locked again? Mods can't moderate the thread properly?

No. 66043

>>66042
It probably generates hundreds of reports because it's always disorganized. It being in that state has nothing to do with mods because if they modded too much, then it's just more complaints.

No. 66053

>>66043
>It being in that state has nothing to do with mods
Yeah, it's the lack of moderation. Locking a thread means they don't need to moderate it whatsoever.

>if they modded too much, then it's just more complaints.

You realize that people are complaining about how threads are arbitrarily treated? Maybe mods shouldn't lock threads they're don't want to personally moderate. The majority of /ot/ is a bigger dumpster fire than left cows ever was and they know it too.

No. 66062

>>66053
You're just baitin the staff. Proceed to tinfoil even though it doesn't make sense.

No. 66207

I got banned yesterday and I appealed my expired ban some hours ago. I just wanted to say to the farmhand? mod? that I appreciate her work despite disagreeing on the topic I was banned for. That's all.

No. 66247

Thanks for the snowflakes!

No. 66250

I love the snowflakes so much! How festive!

No. 66251

File: 1701455612139.jpg (205.84 KB, 1080x1350, 6b01610330763e2bc7a5634774a61a…)

Yaaay! I'm happy to see the snowflakes return!

No. 66255

thank you for the snowflakes and most of all thank you for a way to turn them off!! love them on desktop but prefer them off on my phone. glad to have the choice

No. 66258

File: 1701459500052.gif (1.99 MB, 253x231, yay.gif)

Yes!!! Thank you! How kind and lovely of you.

No. 66292

>>66258
I didn't realize how much I love watching cows eat snowflakes until you posted this nona

No. 66322

Idk if this goes in meta or not but who do you nonas think is gonna win each award? I’m 100% sure titsperging is gonna be the one who wins plot twist

No. 66323

>>66322
Admins who actually take care of the site might win that category imo

No. 66326

>>66322
I think meta general is fine for anons to discuss who they hope win?

No. 66328

Just to confirm we are happy for you to discuss the Lolcow awards in this thread. Have fun!

No. 66342

why is the canada thread autosaged?

No. 66347

>>66342
because of the infighting over immigration (that's what I thought anyway, it was a dumpster fire for a while)

No. 66474

Did the Venus thread disappear? I can't find it for some reason

No. 66480

>>65401
>since oldmin
So you have a sample of … one. The state of this place.

No. 66485

>>66480
Nta, but that's not what that meant

No. 66486

>>66480
No, it's two previous admins before the current one(s). Oldmin and shaymin. Also, I said "feels like" anon. Oldmin's reign lasted a few years so I grew accustomed to that type of struff.

No. 66490

>>66474
Nvm it showed back up now… weird that it was apparently hidden for a little bit

No. 66531

Would a vintage toy collecting thread be okay to make? If so, where should I make it?

No. 66533

>>66531
yes although we already have a doll thread and make it in /m/

No. 66603

What is /manure for? Ik cream is mostly for self posters, 2X is feminism, and Shay is Shay, but I have no clue what manure is

No. 66615

does every ban not get red texted? there's so much racism and racebait in celebricows and I don't see it getting cleaned up despite reporting some.

No. 66616

>>66615
People can get bans without their posts being redtexted, and a lot of redtexts are given without the poster being banned

No. 66673

>>66616
>a lot of redtexts are given without the poster being banned
that part is wrong fyi. Redtexts always mean a ban happened.
>>66615
However if 2 anons spam 30 infight posts there might only be 2 redtexts (1 per user).

No. 66684

>>66616
When is a redtext not a ban?

No. 66687

>>66673
They are almost always used for that purpose but from personal experience I've seen farmhands use minute bans and redtext to communicate. I've had a post redtexted ages ago and never recieved a ban page upon trying to post directly afterwards. Whether that was a malfunction in my case I'm not sure.

No. 66692

Just came here to say the SOS:AWL logo they have added to the page banners is so cute and I am in love with whoever is in charge of choosing those

No. 66694

>>66692
I'm confused, what do you mean?

No. 66695

>>66673
>that part is wrong fyi. Redtexts always mean a ban happened.
That's not true. You can get a redtext without getting a ban and get a ban without getting a redtext.

No. 66696

>>66695
Redtexts can only be given as part of a ban, unless you got 1 minute warning bans you never saw because your IP cycled out before it expired.

No. 66712

>>66696
Not true and mods have addressed this.

No. 66714

File: 1702617654158.png (966.63 KB, 922x882, canada 5.png)

I want to make a Canada General #2, how do I do that?

No. 66715


No. 66723

>>66692
The banner changes have been great, makes the site feel a lot more welcoming and cute. I just wish they'd finish cleaning out those awful banners with bad things in them. Always upsetting to see n*dity.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 66731

>>66723
>with bad things in them. Always upsetting to see n*dity.
Are you a fucking baby wtf

No. 66737

massive racesperg derail in the confessions thread

No. 66743

can we get a BinkiePrincess post reveal? she’s actively shitting up her own thread on a regular basis and currently trying to defend her own pedophilia >>>/pt/864707

No. 66748

>>66743
Please. They haven't stopped shitting up the thread since it's inception.

No. 66751

I keep seeing all these new banners about troons and moids. That's it? That's the best we can do?
May as well make one with a welcome mat for them if we're going to obsess over them that much.

No. 66752

>>66751
I've only seen one, the one with the witch

No. 66755

>>66743
I don't know why they don't lock shit threads from the get-go. Especially if its not something like "shit op". A "shit thread" should be thread closure.

No. 66766

>>66755
her thread should stay open even though the OP is shit. Jess would LOVE for farmhands to close it and bury her past, but she was still selling pedo pander porn and interacting with that circle even after her baby was born. and now she won’t stop WKing herself in her own thread.

No. 66769

>>66751
Seethe more moid.

No. 66771

>>66751
The old banners with female nudity were like a welcome sign for them, these new ones are telling them to fuck off.

No. 66787

>>66751
>That's it? That's the best we can do?
Then make some yourself

No. 66810

when will the results be posted for the lolcow awards?

No. 66838

>>66810
came here to ask the same thing, i'm so curious about the results

No. 66914

>>66810
>>66838
February - March.

Still need to remove the voting header. These things take time.

No. 66916

>>66771
They come here seeking attention, you retard. The old ones meant nothing to them because coomers don't care about a quick flash. Again, you're literally making this site all about them and insisting it's the opposite. This isn't twitter, hun. Doesn't work like that here.

No. 66924

>>66914
it takes several months to remove a header from a website and view the results from a google docs poll? you make the mods sound like amateurs. it should at least be posted before 2023 is over.

No. 66926

>>66924
The mods and admin are unpaid to do all this work and have lives outside of lolcow which is more than I can say for most of the users. If you don't like it, you don't have to be here. This has been routine for years now, newfag.

No. 66940

>>66924
Maybe the admin wants to spend time with their family for the holidays instead of focusing on what whiny entitled anons want

No. 66942

>>66916
You’re right this isn’t twitter, that’s why we can have banners telling men to kill themselves. Sorry if it hurts your feelings.

No. 66972

>>66940
This. Newfags always find something to bitch about.

No. 66998

Would it be possible to create a new Amberlynn Reid thread instead of necroing the old one? With the purpose of creating a good start for the thread with a milk overview spanning of links and a rundown of each year as well as a list of associated cows such as prominent ambabies and reaction channel cows. The old thread just lacks genuine effort. I feel like we could have a better milky discussion here than on kiwi or Reddit where this topic has a following, just because of the fact that we’re women who also notice that amberlynn haydurs are retarded moids too.

No. 67000

when are we shutting down

No. 67005

Merry Christmas admin and farmhands!!!

No. 67014

>>66998
i would love an alr thread. didn't she make it into one of the new banners? she should have an updated thread.

No. 67019

>>66998
I'd much prefer it over the other farms. also a good old fashioned lolcow who isn't a pedo or a rapist would be nice here, might uplift the mood a bit

No. 67030

>>66998
You are welcome to make a fresh thread!

No. 67032

>>67030
Thank you so much, I’ll start working on compiling all the milk! The current one that's pretty shit is on /pt/. Should the new one be there too or should we try to see if it gets farmers more involved on /snow/ first?

No. 67059

>>67032
i'd put it in /snow/ for more traffic. if farmhands dont agree with it they can always move the thread over to /pt/

No. 67838

out of curiosity, I have a question for oldfags. how has LC site culture changed over the years? have those changes been for better or worse?

No. 67899

>>67838
Not sure how old we're talking here, but I was there when /cgl/ started going downhill and began paying serious attention to the site when the Felice Fawn, Berry Tsukasa and shmegeh threads were starting to take off (2015).
Might just be the nostalgia talking here, but people are a lot more paranoid and sensitive nowadays. You could make edgy jokes and be cringe about your 4chan-related interests without people and jannies losing their minds. It felt as though the posters were both cringier yet cooler back then.
You can still have decent conversations and stumble upon fun threads, but you have to shift through a lot of shit, such as tiktok-fags, unfunny people trying to be funny, low-quality content for the sake of content etc. Guess the early years were better due to the amount of content we could talk about. The best threads around now are the moovie nights and doodle board in my opinion.
The community was slightly chaotic, but the site felt like it had a purpose and everyone had a similar mindset across the boards/threads despite varying topics. It's kind of like comparing old anime cons to what we have now I guess.
I think it's a clash of oldfags getting older and newfags not understanding the culture of the site and where it came from.
Moderation has also become more stifling, but at least the site loads faster now.
There's also this recently made thread >>>/ot/1817934 if you want to read more about what some oldfags think about the state of the site.

No. 67942

Tranny accusing me of being a moid and requesting hand pics to masturbate over
>>1957993

No. 68386

>>67838
>>67899 is pretty spot-on.
for the record i have no nostalgia for how lolcow used to be.

No. 68512

>>67899
What do you think is to blame for this push to sensitivity and policing people so much? While I agree society felt meaner back in like the 00's when I was a teenager at least you could say whatever you wanted and it was like damn thats an opinion, let's move on. Now it's like everything vaguely non PC has got the pitchforks out and people are like leading crusades against people for their opinions it's utter madness imo.
The left and nerd culture used to feel like a refuge from society and the right…now it's just as puritanical and unrelenting

No. 68552

>>68512
There's a lot of people looking for proof about things now which is understandable. early 2000s was tabloid culture, even online.

No. 69117

I think I posted in the wrong place but I'm trying to figure out what happened with Elaine's thread(s)

No. 69213

>>67032
Are you still working on this anon? I'd be happy to try to make a write up of her milk if you aren't interested anymore

No. 69242

Can I be permabanned please? Thank you.

No. 69673

>>67838
i'm late but like >>67899, this place was a lot more fun, so, so much more fun. the milk especially was way more entertaining and silly, mainly because people actually went to cons and/or ran in the same circles with a lot of cows, so there was always something stupid to talk about and it was fun to just laugh at people being weird and goofy. most of the cows we talked about were genuine eccentric types who were relatively harmless speds with unusual personality quirks and strange behavior, other than obviously toxic characters like onision. no thots and political stuff - just weirdos like kanadajin, early venus, vicky, felice, pre-incest chris-chan.

i feel like older farmers also had a genuine sense of humor about themselves and their lives as well. we all knew we were weirdo weebs, since most of us grew up during a time when anime and manga was still perceived as "strange" by normalfags, and being on the internet was considered even weirder by most since you would get labeled a nerd or a shut in introvert. so even though people here did fight a lot and we could be assholes to each other, i think we understood one other and related well because we all had similar interests and experiences in our own lives that drove us to using lolcow, /cgl/, maxfag, etc. i don't feel the same kind of connection on the boards now and i notice a lot of the younger users don't always understand how different things were because "nerd" culture has become so normalized and mainstream.

i do think some of it is age related, but it's also how internet culture has changed since the mid 2010's and after covid. i agree, people are way more sensitive, way more argumentative, too quick to get upset even when you meant no harm; it's like they're always assuming you have some sort of ulterior motive or have an agenda. like >>68512, in the 2000's people said and wrote crazy offensive stuff all the time. people in general moved on, even if they were offended or bothered by it, they just moved on. you were expected to be thick skinned and not take things personally, because there was always the risk of you getting posted and flamed on encyclopedia dramatica or 4chan for engaging with trolls. internet culture also did not revolve around politics 24/7. we used to get told that it wasn't about us, stop being retarded, go touch grass, gtfo your mom's basement…it was quite mean but eventually you got over it.

No. 69714

>>69673
Who is "we," motherfucker?

No. 69725

>>69714
I stand by anon

No. 69974

why do i keep getting told i'm ban evading when i've never even received a ban message/warning or whatever

No. 71389

>>69974
It happens sometimes. You cop a ban for a post you never made. It’s something to do with the vpn getting mixed up. Just appeal it. Or if that won’t work just download another web browser. Admins here are fucking stupid kek.

No. 71672

File: 1708707184502.png (895.91 KB, 640x640, IMG_0773.png)

Been using lolcow for quite a few years now and I’ve always wondered a few things:
1. How did people find out about lolcow when it was first created; was it advertised anywhere?
2. How does lolcow afford to keep running what with no ads?

No. 71674

>>71672
1. oldfags usually migrated here from /cgl/ and then stamina rose
2. donations from users and staff members

No. 71695

>>71672
We (the admins) pay out of pocket for all costs, no contributions are made by farmhands or users. There was a Ko-fi at one point that the previous admin made, but we closed it as it was pointless (it hadn't received a donation in over 6 months at the time of us closing it).

No. 71718

>>71695
there was someone who gave the site a large amount of money a while back (I think it was during shaymin's time), was that all gone or was there any money leftover?

No. 71722

>>71695
Hey how come the "three of you" only ever use the turquoise admin tag?

No. 71730

>>71718
that was when oldmin was around and threatening to shut down the site

No. 71732

What counts as bone rattling?

No. 71742

File: 1708785998836.jpg (178.05 KB, 1080x1913, vTngcXp.jpg)

Would a thread on lookmaxxing scammers @syrianpsycho or @anastasiabeautyfascia be milky enough to warrant a thread and not get closed?
A lot of them shill their self help products by lying about surgery or encouraging their followers to develop insecurities to make money. In addition to them being political grifters.

No. 71743

>>71742
Thread requests is in /pt/. I swear someone posts something like this here every other day now kek.

No. 71784

Do any actual women post in the ideal male bodies thread? Do they??

No. 71785

>>71784
Yes. This is what women actually like when they aren't being nagged to death about dadbods being so hot ackthually.

No. 71788

>>71785
Damn ok could’ve sworn you were all fags kek

No. 71793

>>71784
it's funny how that thread is full of that specific type of muscular moid. There's nothing wrong with liking whitebread with muscles but I'm sure anons' taste is more diverse right?

No. 71795

File: 1708849780004.png (40.22 KB, 1191x117, 433.png)

>>71793
That's because whenever something slightly different from that is posted (like that one super skinny slenderman looking guy) anons roast them in like 100 replies kek so everyone else is probably too scared to post

No. 71802

>>71793
I asked if anyone liked skinny guys and they posted a slightly less roided out roidpig kek.

No. 71815

>>71784
No it’s direct clone of the 4chan handsome men thread except a little classier. Demographic shifts and it’s not even subtle

No. 71835

Where is the CC hate thread?

No. 71836

>>71784
As long as they cut off the heads of the moids I dont mind the thread tbh. The ones who try to sneak in faces need to be banned



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]