[ Rules ] [ ot / g ] [ pt / snow ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password
(For post deletion)

We are expanding our team.
Looking for: Janitors / Thread Mods / Global Mods / Discord mods / Admin
You can apply here

File: 1538712517721.jpg (19.08 KB, 384x188, 1439818584170.jpg)

No. 6816

Third edition!

Please post all general issues and complaints here. If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.

>>>/meta/6821 should only be used for technical issues and suggestions (can't load site, site slow, bugs, site feature requests). This thread is for non-technical issues.

No. 6817

>>6816

The Technical Help & Feature Suggestions thread is locked.

No. 6818

>>6568

The rules still have not been renumbered, ie. 3.2 and 3.3 are missing.

No. 6819

Honest question: Why do farmhands give a fuck about "derailing" in /ot/ on threads that obviously bait major arguing and infighting?

What's there to "derail" when every post is literally someone else, or a ban evader, trying to provoke the next reaction?
It's like either delete the thread or allow the argument. It's fucking retarded to try to moderate a shitshow like those types of threads are even work saving. At least autosage them or something.

No. 6823

>>6819
i've been wondering this myself honestly. maybe it's cause /ot/ doesn't really matter at all?

No. 6824

>>6819
>>6823
Most threads in /ot/ have issues with derailing brought forth by infighting but you are right in the sense that some threads provoke more infighting than others. The manhate thread and unpopular opinion threads for example. We have autosaged manhate in the past and it only led to anons making new threads or complaining about autosage. We've banned anons responding to incels in the past as well. If we allow "debate" or discussion then the anons cry for moderators to clean up their threads after the fact.

If you have a solution to issues similar to the ones mentioned above, we're all ears.
>>6817
We're going to be making minor changes to some rules, that's the reason for the delay.

No. 6825

>>6824
I honestly wish /manure/ came back so trash threads could be moved to it.

No. 6826

>>6824
even if the anons bitch about their shitty threads being autosaged, it makes sense to me to do it if they're causing issues.

No. 6829

>>6826
"someone bitched about it" is the reasoning for not doing anything logical around here, don't you know?

No. 6830

All these "I hate x/anti-x" threads on /ot/ are getting out of hand. All of them feel like thinly veiled bait, especially the new one about Koreans, people are just using it to shit on Asians and Asian cultural differences.

No. 6831

>>6830
Seriously how is that thread any different than those race threads that were banned a while ago?

No. 6832

>>6831
this! i just reported it and was going to complain here. anons are getting accused of gatekeeping for trying to stick to korea and not just Asians in general. how tf is that not racist?

No. 6833

>>6832
The idea in general is just stupid wether it’s one group of people or not. Its a huge circle jerk at this point and it’s obvious a lot of anons are just jaded weebs

No. 6834

>>6833
I kind of was on board at first, since /ot/ has a lot of Korean themed threads but I agree. They immediately started bitching about how dudes view Asian women. That has zero to do with Korean culture or it's issues.

Korea has tons of problems:
>racism
>extreme body image issues
>misogyny
>horrible views on mental health
>horrible views on homosexuality

But no, the thread is just bitching about how weeb dudes find Asian women pure. Great.

No. 6835

>>6834
i wasn't with it at first, but fuck, anons on /ot/ are so fucking vapid. you'd think they'd have something useful to say with all the alleged radfems there, but it's just bitching about stacks of cups.

No. 6836

>>6835
Same. You’d think somebody would mention the fact that abortion is illegal and how absurdly high their suicide rate is, but its all just “waaaah koreans double dip!! Fucking savages, koreans are all dogs!!”

No. 6837

>>6836
>suicide
They did, you didn't read the thread

No. 6838

>>6837
the first post about that was around the same time you posted this, which was 2 hours after anon mentioned that. hmm…

No. 6839

>>6838
If you read through the thread there has been mentions of suicide before that

No. 6840

Can someone do something about the amina /snow/ thread? We got people using racial slurs and crying whiteknight

No. 6841

>>6840
So report and don't engage. It's shit like this that makes people scream white knight since people do their damndest to get Amina's threads locked.

No. 6842

Is https://lolcow.farm/practest/ supposed to be hidden? It is being indexed by Google. I found it by searching for "lolcow.farm Kelly Jean".

No. 6843

Can the mod who keeps arbitrarily moving threads to /g/ stop? The website rec thread is not /g/ related in the slightest. It doesn't go there.

No. 6845

>>6843
I disagree, it fits better there imo

No. 6847

The man-hating thread is a disaster. I know it's a dump fire anyway, but the amount of men and incels that post continuously and blatantly aren't banned quick enough. Is it not feasible to get someone dedicated to that thread?

No. 6848

>>6847
We have 2 farmhands who regularly check the thread everyday.

No. 6849

>>6848
Thanks for the information, I guess they are in the same time zone though as there are periods of 6-7 hours men post freely. I appreciate the work you all do, I'd just love to see more control in that thread.

No. 6850

Can we please get rid of the "Daddys little porkchop" banner?
A gif of some chick fondling her bare ass isn't really SFW.

No. 6851

what in the goddamn fuck

>>>/ot/308576

No. 6853

>>308564
End this shite already.

No. 6854

>>6850
agreed. it's really not even that relevant anymore. there's no milk on her anymore and she's not legendary like pt or even kiki or anything. it's just an annoying one that's 4chan tier tbh

No. 6855

>>6850
>>6854
Neither is the one of pt giving fellatio to a corn dog or making the o-face in the bathtub.

Why are you stanning for Mystery? She's legendary for this site and even has her own post archive a la Kiki style.

No. 6856

>>6855
>not wanting to see mystery's bare ass all the damn time
>WHY ARE YOU STANNING FOR MYSTERY
????

pt is way more legendary than mystery despite her not being much of a topic anymore. it's not even comparable. plenty of flakes and cows have their own post history. that's not unique at all and it doesn't make them deserving of a banner. besides, pt's corndog banner is awkward and embarrassing, but not NSFW and nearly as porny.

No. 6857

There was an anon appealing some auto bans, please let me know if you're still experiencing issues with posting via email or by posting in this thread (if possible).

No. 6858

>>6855

After Raven and Logan split up anons asked for his banner to be removed and Admin refused.

No. 6859

>>6856
Yikes, you're passionate about this aren't you?
Okay how about furthermore the banners of
>Palermo's tits
>Moo's half naked ass
>Onision getting shot out of the chair
Don't get mad when I say you're being oddly selective..because this stuff isn't worksafe either.

>>6858
Haven't seen that recently, is it finally gone or something?

No. 6861

I assume Admin is aware of the bug that is resulting in double and triple posts. I first noticed it happening during the 50* outages last week.

>>6859

Dead-eyed Logan is still in rotation.

No. 6862

File: 1539528431780.png (14.97 KB, 1535x244, stupidmod.png)

I'm not this anon, just concerned, because this isn't cowtipping.

This person is talking about sharing moo videos with a discord. Why is someone with such poor english skills allowed to mod? Please fix this shit.

No. 6864

>>6861
I'm still having this issue and just tried to delete some of the extras in the celeb thread and getting a "not enough space on device" error?

No. 6868

>>6850
>>6854
>>6856
>>6858

When was the last time a new banner was added, despite anons taking the time to make so many worthy submissions?

Admin doesn't give a fuck.

No. 6870

>>6862
There's a banhappy piss poor reading comprehension mod on the team that needs to be removed asap

No. 6874

Can someone explain to me why the Luna thread is in pt? It's 99% milkless, full of junkies and BPD cunts arguing and nitpicking her art/weight/make-up. What exactly is the justification for this? I mean they even made a bingo card of all the same tired old shit that gets brought up all the time, surely that's saying something?

No. 6875

>>6874

I asked the same about the Fahr Sindram thread.

Don't expect an answer. I didn't get one.

No. 6878

File: 1539684342343.png (85.21 KB, 338x462, no contribution.png)

>>6870

fucking this. i can't seem to post a comment in momokun's thread without getting a ban. the most recent said "no contribution. this is not your personal chat room." as if 95% of momokun's thread isn't people making fun of her looks and comparing her to ugly characters. this has happened multiple times and mods need to get their shit together.

No. 6879

What is up with the site hiccuping / server errors?

No. 6880

So has racebait just been declared all good for ot or what? The eye colour retards have been at it for about 18 hours and mods seem cool with it.
I miss having based mods.

No. 6881

File: 1539695349955.jpeg (7.21 KB, 232x218, download (1).jpeg)

>>6779
>>6779
Riiiight. So why don't you ban autistic femcels that take obvious bait and derail like how one of the old admins did to trolls? Whenever an incel pops up there's at least a few anons telling everyone not to take the bait and they still do. They're just as responsible for shitting up the thread as the incels are.

>>6880
>anons being this neurotic about eye colour
>mods don't give a shit
This would be hilarious if it weren't so sad. /ot/ is such a dumpster fire.

No. 6882

>>6878
I feel like the lack of sage on /pt/ has caused more bans there, which is stupid. Sage or not, we're still allowed to post shit like this. If you're going to ban everyone who isn't dumping milk, you might as well put sage back on. It's been ruining the threads.

No. 6883

>>6816
I'm having issues with the shayna and fupa thread, not loading all the posts

No. 6884

File: 1539715158658.png (95.14 KB, 800x833, Screenshot_2018-10-16-11-37-07…)

Shit is broken and spurring infighting all over the site.

No. 6885

>>6883

Do you have the "hide saged posts" option turned on?

No. 6886

If "Hi, cow" is officially against the rules, perhaps add it to the list and enforce it equally. Anons are infighting over being accused and then infighting over whether it is a rule.

>>6818

TFW such a glaring error still has not been fixed over a month later: management deserves the ridicule it receives from other sites.

No. 6887

>>6881
Yeah swallowing all the bait is encouraged, pointing out bait is a bannable offence. Maybe a mod is one of the racebair spergs?

No. 6888

Please do something about the unpopular opinion thread in /ot/. I'm so sick of all the caucasian insecurity. That borderline cp needs to be spoilered too, it's fucking gross.

No. 6889

>>6888
Caucasian insecurity makes it sound like you’re the one sperging our about Asian women superiority.

No. 6890

>>6889
No one is doing that. You know what people are doing though? Getting triggered and completely derailing the thread when someone says they don't like blonde hair and blue eyes.

No. 6891

>>6890
Point is the Caucasian bit comes off as trying to be inflammatory. The eye colour posting is sheer autism and demands a hellweek. It’s the third time it’s cropped up in some form. Mods don’t care, probably are the ones screaming about poop eyes.

No. 6892

>>6891
That's why it was spoilered. You can call it "inflammatory" all you want, but it's true.

No. 6893

>>6892
If there’s no race sperging why does Caucasian factor in then? Pick one anon.

No. 6894

>>6893
There is race sperging, but it's not about how ~superior~ asian women are. It's coming from insecure white women who chimp the fuck out when someone says they aren't attracted to features some white people have, especially at non-whites. They equate not liking these features to jealousy, self-hatred, and/or racism.

No. 6895

>>6894
Imo there’s too many chimps to blame anyone in particular.its just as likely a man larping as a blue eyed woman with a hang up. Plus there’s frequent dae hate white women lol garbage floating around from low effort trolls.

No. 6896

The sage rules on this website are fucking absurd. I don't really see the point of sage-ing anything unless it bumps a totally dead thread for no reason or if it's a total blogpost. Because otherwise what happens is every other thread that isn't on /pt/ just fucking stagnates and dies because it never gets bumped even if there's an active discussion going on or new milk to discuss because everyone sages every single post out of fear their some other anon will jump down their throat for not sage-ing.

Also anons trying to shut down discussion of a cow in a relevant thread should be bannable. (Ex: the random spergs that appear out of nowhere in Celebricow threads who throw a hissy fit and scream "no one cares move on!" the second Azealia Banks's name is mentioned even though she's currently involved in active drama and is certifiably one of the milkiest celebrities) I thought this was a discussion board but all these rules do is discourage any any discussion that isn't one specific type of comment deemed "new milk".

Basically on a discussion board, imo the only thing that should be saged should be anything that discourages active or relevant conversation (again, blogposts or bumping dead threads for no reason). Anything else should be fair game. If you only want new milk posted, then this should be a news site, not a discussion site. It's the equivalent of saying "This is a current events forum and if you post a news story from CNN you won't get banned but if you discuss any of the ramifications of anything going on in the world or your opinion or politics on this forum that's not contributing and ur banned!!"
Then what's the fucking point of this website?

>>6850
Fucking this. I'm glad I'm not the only person who can't stand that banner.

No. 6897

>>6868
I feel like half of the banners in rotation now aren't even relevant at all anymore. I get Kiki and PT (especially considering the main board is named after her) but most of the other ones I feel like are 10 pages back at this point with no new milk. We need more current ones like Dasha or Baylee or TND or Jeffree.

Honestly while I'm at it, I don't understand the /pt/ qualifications at all? We're on our 6th Baylee Jae thread, 20th TND thread, 4th Costhot (all in /snow/) and Almost 3rd Celebricows thread in /ot/. None of these are good enough for /pt/ but the Fahr Sindram from 3 years ago with less than 500 comments is allowed on /pt/? What? The standards don't make any sense.

No. 6899

>>6897
The celebricows thread fits better in /ot/ because the userbase is more chill, but I agree on the others. Shoe belongs in /pt/ too imo. /pt/ is extremely boring right now, it could use some new cows.

As for banners, most of them are irrelevant because no one is submitting new ones. Mods should encourage people to make some for the current cows. We need a town hall so bad.

No. 6900

Mods, pls

No. 6902

File: 1539750424718.png (32.47 KB, 800x183, Screenshot_2018-10-16-21-24-40…)

>>6868
>>6899

Did this actually happen? I don't recall new banners being added in May.

>>>/meta/962

No. 6905

>>6902
No, I haven't seen any of the newer banners. It's been over a year since new ones got added. Even some of the ones submitted since the last one was added are now outdated (i.e. the munchie threads are banned and the billie drama is irrelevant)

No. 6907

Can we have a mass ban of the retards derailing the unpopular opinion thread? It's been like this for stupid amounts of time. Do we just not have mods anymore or what?

No. 6908

how sad it must be that site banners rustle your jimmies so hard.

No. 6909

>>6908

It's a very visible symptom of the larger problem of neglect of the site.

No. 6910

>>6909
anon pls, on a list of importance, something so small is the least of lolcow problems lmao

No. 6911

>>6909
You guys are so sensitive and needy it’s unreal. No wonder mods left /ot/ to rot. Good shit honestly.

No. 6912

>>6847
I know this is old but I can't get over the entitlement of wanting a dedicated mod for possibly the shittiest thread on the site. It's either trolls or seriously damaged individuals in there, everyone else avoids it like the plague.

>>6874
Thread moving doesn't seem to be a thing any more? I used to follow her threads, but now I just check in occasionally and then nope the fuck out for the reasons you mentioned. And lol, they made several bingo cards, and still missed half the problems.

>>6897
the first two of those you mention only got that far because of an influx of newfags and endless nitpicking bullshit. The Baylee Jae threads were basically pinned to the top for the first 4 because what is sage / oh I forgot to mention she is really shit and I hate her / lol she can't draw xD … Agree that Fahr doesn't need the spot, but neither do those two. (don't follow the other two)

So … any progress on town hall or hellweek or anything like that? (diehard optimist)

No. 6913

>>6911

What does OT have to do with banners? Think of the lack of banners as broken windows theory.

>>6910

I am the anon who pointed out and has been reminding mods of the misnumbering in the rules list, rules that have not been codified, and the recent 50* server errors and duplicate posts. I can be concerned about all of these things.

No. 6914

>>6913
well hop on mod team know-it-all nancy. is your daily life filled with gatekeeping as well?

No. 6915

>>6914
Lol sounds like Raven's op anon

No. 6916

>>6912
>I can't get over the entitlement of wanting a dedicated mod for possibly the shittiest thread on the site
She suggested it because multiple anons volunteered to do it before… I don't think it's that entitled.

No. 6917

Can we please autosage the shaygnar thread? It's one of the worst on the site. ALL of the posters in it are camwhores nitpicking and gossiping about eachother.

No. 6918

>>6911
>>6908
>come to complaint thread to complain about complaints
ok

No. 6919

Noticing a weird trend of people trying to shoehorn other cows (with or without threads) in random threads. It's happened in 3 or 4 in the past 24 hours. I reported it but just weird.

Also, people who complain about us complaining about mods can suck on a railroad spike. I know mods don't get paid, but that's even more of a reason to not be shit, they're not getting anything out of it, so either git gud or let someone else do it.

No. 6920

>>6915
lmao good call

>>6916
It's one thread, in a section that gets less traffic anyway. One thread. Even Moo doesn't get that sort of attention, and that has to be the busiest thread on the board.

No. 6921

so its been awhile, whats the deal with kelly jean? is she still offlimits or what?

No. 6922

>>6920
The man hate thread gets shitloads of traffic, what are you talking about? /ot/ doesn't have a crazy amount of traffic overall, but there are about 3 threads that generate the vast majority of it and the man hate thread is the biggest one. When robots inevitably come to shit it up, it moves extremely fast and it takes the mods hours to ban the robots and clean. If some anons are volunteering to do it pronto instead of letting the bots run amok for hours like the mods do, why not let them?

No. 6923

>>6922
can you not read, she said the thread does get shitloads of attention, but /ot/ is dead usually.

either way, the manhate thread is the worst on the site and i think it's time you fucks moved on anyway.

No. 6924

>>6923
Then maybe you should hide it, retard.

No. 6925

>>6924
>gets called out for not being able to read
>continues to not know how to read
>adhom

oh okay. thanks for showing me how reasonable and collected people who use that thread are!

No. 6926

File: 1539907299436.png (52.51 KB, 800x373, Screenshot_2018-10-18-16-58-07…)

>>6921

Thread #2 was put into an unlinked directory which was still indexed by Google. It's now 404.

No. 6927

Why was the conspiracy loon who created the Transinvestigation thread >>>/ot/312161 redirected to Gender Critical? They were banned in an earlier thread >>>/ot/249947 and then redtexted for ban evasion >>>/ot/250146.

No. 6928

what idiot mod directed that trans tinfoiling to the GC thread? those kinds of posters were banned from it a few months ago. celebrity trans theories are not GC.

No. 6931

>>6925
What? If you don't like the man hate thread, hide it instead of bitching.

And you can't blame me for not understanding that anon's post, the way she worded it made it confusing as fuck. Was her point supposed to be
>The thread that gets way more traffic than the any other thread on the site shouldn't have it's own volunteer janitor because I think it's entitled
Because that makes no sense. It would've made more sense to complain about the traffic, so that's what I though she meant to do. Unless she was agreeing with me…? I still can't tell.

No. 6932

>>6927
>>6928
Came here to complain about this too. Transvestigation will derail the shit out of GC and plus most of the posters in the Tranvestigation thread were following for lulz only. Why it'd be redirected to GC is absolutely nonsensical.

Also it's been 5 days since a Farmhand even came in here to address any concerns and even then it didn't address anything. Wtf is going on.

No. 6933

>>6857
That was probably me, it popped up again recently and I reported it, so I'm guessing it was then and you posted here after actioning it. If so, thank you! (I have no idea if it is still in effect, IP switches regularly, and I haven't hit a 'bad' one to check)

No. 6934

>>6925
I tried reading it a couple of times after hearing people mocking it / talking about how messy it is, and it's just amazing. This one is positively diplomatic and eminently reasonable compared to the rest of them.

>>6931
>way more traffic

once again, what are you on? Onision, Moo, TND, and so on all get more traffic. And unlike your precious thread, most of said traffic isn't bots, incels, and lunatics. So yes, asking for a dedicated mod for that trashfire is entitled. Especially since - again - they're obviously stretched thin on staff as it is.

No. 6935

>>6934
The anons claiming they want to "volunteer to mod the thread" clearly don't understand how modding works on chans. They think they could just sit in the thread and delete shit or ban people with ease.

If that thread is so much of a dumpster fire of bait and infighting, get rid of it.

>inb4 hide the thread


I don't use /ot/. I just hate that this one shitty thread seems to be creating such a stink.

No. 6936

>>6919
i saw this earlier in the uggo cosplay thots thread. someone claimed that yaya's cosplay should be posted in the usagi kou thread cause it's zero-two and then proceeded to link the thread.

No. 6937

>>6935
>ban a popular thread because some dick suckers are offended by it
OK sounds like a great practice for a chan to pick up. The infighting would stop if you retards could learn to stop looking at it lmao. I'm not even from the thread and I think you people are being weird about it.

No. 6938

>>6937
nta but

>ignores the part about not reading it


lmao, the thread is like 80% bait and fighting, it's not popular. also, how do you know it's popular if you don't go on the thread hmm?

No. 6939

Anti-Korea thread is full of racebait and sperging. Who could've guessed?

No. 6940

>>6939
It's gotten worse too

No. 6941

>>6938
agreed, the thread may be popular, but it's popular with incels and femcels, so who the fuck wants that?

No. 6942

>>6921
>>6926
I would also like to know.
Kelly pulling this shit to get both threads off google proves even more so that she belongs on this website.

No. 6943

>>6942

To clarify >>6926, Admin removed the practest page a couple of weeks ago after they found out it was indexed by Google and thus visible. Admin deleted the comment in this thread letting them know.

No. 6944

>>6943
I was lead to believe that thread #2 was taken down because of her patreon stuff being leaked, she did mention it herself in that thread that she was looking into it.

I believe her 1st thread didn't have patreon stuff? I could be wrong though. If this is the case what's stopping us from making another thread and keeping Patreon content off limits?
I could be wrong but i'm sure discussing public knowledge of her being a lazy homewrecker + her breast augmentation isn't illegal and doesn't warrant a lawsuit.

No. 6945

What's with the website making people post dupes of the same post? This has been going on for weeks now.

No. 6946

File: 1540260374968.jpg (52.39 KB, 500x667, cunt.jpg)

Can we please get the Jeffree Star goons out of here? Anytime Jeffree starts some shit and we try to talk about it on the Makeup Guru thread they show up and start whining about context or how it's ok to be racist and attacking the people who have proof.

The thread is supposed to be about makeup gurus and the beauty community, not explaining to people why racism is wrong over and over and over again. It's a waste of time and it shouldn't even be a debate at this point and Jeffree is such a cow it'd be great to be able to actually talk about it.

No. 6947

Could you please put the Gaijin Hunter/VK lolcow threads in auto-sage or give some ol'bans?
They're filled with the same weebs circlejerk unable to sage their shit (emojis, exciting shitposts about how they fucked some X,Y,Z STDs riddled hosts and of course some classic vendettas)
I know you've got a lot of moderation to do lately but it's really getting annoying to watch these cows messing around in /snow.
Have a nice day anyway dear farm team!

No. 6948

>>6917
this please. shayna's entire thread is a saged livechat anyhow. anons in the thread act like femcels and it's been out of control for way too long.

can we also ban one sentence replies that end in kek or lmao? it'll never happen but hey, it's a dream.

No. 6949

>>6948
Can we please have a golbal no racebaiting rule? We keep getting people leaking from 4chan and kiwifarms derailing like no tomorrow that it's leaking onto other boards.

No. 6950

>>6948
wot? literally what would this achieve? you want a minimum word count for posts?

No. 6951

>>6949
Rule 3.5c anon, it already exists and people get reported / redtexted for ti.

No. 6953

>>6949
It is against the rules, mods are just lazy

No. 6954

>>6950
if you're adding to disco it clearly wouldn't affect you in any way, so why worry about it?

No. 6956

>>6954
this isn't /r9k/

No. 6957

>>6816

Hi. A friend was banned but they didn't tell her why. She sent them a email too. Is this normal? Thx.

No. 6958

If reaction images with no accompanying text is a "ban warning", I suggest adding it into the fucking rules so posts aren't compromised. Thanks.

No. 6959

How many times do we have to beg you before you actually do something about the shay thread? This is stupid.

No. 6960

Can we ban the "milk" anon in the vick thread? She's been shitting the thread up for days without proof and it's getting annoying.

No. 6961

>>6959
Are you her fat Tumblr fan or whatever? That threads above board as far as milk and ontopicness goes compared to the rest of snow

I had to actually double check there wasn't somehow two shaygnar threads seeing people complain here… I've not seen any of what's being claimed and I lurk those threads fairly frequently since there's always fresh material

No. 6962

>>6961
no disrespect but how is poring over pictures of her diseased vag, or zooming into her walls and saying there's shit on them milk? that's what the thread does. that, livechat, and spam her camshows. incels and robots must love that thread.

No. 6963

>>6962
I agree that some people need to learn how to sage there, but it's also very milky too. You can always hide the thread.

No. 6964

File: 1540617902326.png (26.91 KB, 1357x91, screenshot.png)

>>6946
This. Mods can you PLEASE do something about this? That thread is a mess. I'm so tired of the Jeffree-apologists making it so we can't discuss anything.

Can there just be consequences for derailing the thread with no basis for accusations? Like people constantly claiming things are fake for no real reason or explanation of why it's "fake"? Or saying shit like this? Since when is a public figure/beauty guru whose fortune is based off of people buying his product/persona being shown to be racist several times not considered milk in a Beauty Guru thread? It's not even like it's old milk, accusations are still coming out constantly?

No. 6966

>>6964
/snow needs an overhaul, the threads are a mess.

No. 6967

kudos to the farmhand who's actually trying tonight. I'm proud of u~

No. 6968

>>6967
Eh disagree. I was actually coming here to complain about the new ban happy mod because all I see tonight is red text everywhere over difficult to discern offenses. Since when is it against the rules to post a link to milk or other relevant cow info? I just read through the rules again and couldn't find anything except that we can't link directly to onion vids.

No. 6969

>>6968
I haven't seen a single poster get redtexted without deserving it.

>Since when is it against the rules to post a link to milk or other relevant cow info?

Where did this happen? Do you mean the anon who linked an image instead of posting a cap of the image (which you are supposed to do)?

No. 6971

>>6968
click the "adhere to board culture" link and shut the fuck up.

No. 6972

can we lock or autosage the costhot thread on /snow/? or something? a very lovely farmhand decided to post in the thread and lay down some truth to those idiots and so far the only posts have been them squawking and not posting milk. still. the thread OP is abysmal and the thread is all salt and no substance.

No. 6974

Holy fuck can everyone stop bitching in every single thread on lolcow about saging??? God damn, the space it takes to make these mini-mod posts all the fucking time is 1,000,000,000x more annoying than someone possibly bumping a thread with no milk. Jesus, just report the posts or shut the fuck up already.

No. 6975

>>6974
Are you new to image boards? So called "mini-modding" has always happened because it helps to keep the culture organic. Admin even said they're short staffed FFS, why would you get mad and tell people to yell into the void by reporting shit to our already over-worked farmhands when they can simply remind people in the thread.

No. 6976

>>6896
Thank you!! You're not alone in this line of thought anon

No. 6980

>>6975

>>6974:

>report the posts or shut the fuck up already
>or shut the fuck up
>shut the fuck up

Anon that's what mods are for……….

It's annoying to see all the time and gunks up the threads. Like, if they'd post content as well as reeeee'ing "sAgE" all the time it wouldn't be an issue and we wouldn't need to beckon the understaffed mods at all.

No. 6981

>>6980
learn2quote and integrate.

no shit that's what the mods are for, but users are also not barred from reminding people to sage. much of the time people who didn't sage simply forgot, which would waste the mod's time.

you should be saging your posts too btw, since you're arguing rather than making a good complaint.

No. 6982

>>6981
>users are also not barred from reminding people to sage

That's my point and my complaint.

No. 6983

Why was the Taylor Nicole Dean + Jonny Craig thread moved to /pt/? Are anons just deciding which board to put their threads in now?

No. 6984

>>6983
If you checked the previous thread then you'd see farmhands gave the okay for the move.

I don't read her threads often but she seems milky enough for PT.

No. 6985

>>6984
I had checked the previous thread but apparently not closely enough because I couldn't find anything about the move.

Maybe mods and the admin could address the fact that there really needs to be an overhaul of thread organization between the two boards. /snow/ is a fast paced cesspool and /pt/ has about three active threads at the moment. I realize it would take way more manpower than the site is capable of but it's still an annoying issue (among many other issues they aren't dealing with.)

No. 6986

>>6983
>>6985
>>6984
>>>/snow/721097

lurk moar and mind your business, there is in fact a string of comments between farmhands and anons from a few days ago.

No. 6987

>>6986
fuck off and stop being a backseat moderator

No. 6988

>>6987
oh wow sorry anon! forgive me for knowing how the fuck to read.

No. 6989

>>6987
Says the anon who came to the thread to bitch to the mods about something that's none of their business.

You think the mods and admin would you know, see the thread and lock it rather than leave it up for 2 day. Pathetic.

No. 6990

File: 1540903050201.jpeg (286.48 KB, 750x1498, A9123ECD-C8EC-4EFF-827F-A6239C…)

I was randomly just given someone else’s ban from March ‘18
Not like I care, just thought I should mention in case it was accidentally happening to other anons.

No. 6991

The Costhot thread needs to be deleted at this point because all it is is infighting about Belle Delphine. Ask for milk, we don’t get milk. Ask for milk again after she’s been posted like 5 times and a farmhand says “stop bitching, she’s bound to have milk”. Who is picking these farmhands?

No. 6992

>>6991
The farmhand didn't say that, she told people to post the actual milk, and people on both sides just bitched and whined again. I agree the thread needs to be remade tho.

No. 6993

>>6990
ugh, this happens to me all the time. I've even been accidentally permabanned at least twice now.

No. 6994

>>6992
A farmhand earlier on said "a popular costhot is bound to have milk".

No. 6995

Can the Luna Slater thread be dropped into /snow now? It's been low on milk for ages, and it gets so much nitpicking bullshit. Like omg look how filthy her nails are, how filthy her clothes are, she can't even do make-up, and so on. Anons being able to sage their bullshit would be nice.

No. 6996

>>6991
I posted some milk, the relentless whiteknighting in her PULL thread, and the fact that she took down Pewdiepie's video for NOTHING. I don't doubt she and her friends are the cause of the derailment.

No. 6997

>>6996
Actually, an anon just posted a good summarization of her milk which is what we were asking for in the first place. Don’t assume it’s whiteknighting just because we weren’t eating up baseless accusations. Now that someone posted milk, we can let this fucking rest.

No. 6998

Please do something about the shay gnar/dolly thread. It’s getting flooded with blog posting cam girls who don’t sage when posting about how much they actually shower and shave.

No. 6999

>>6998
Agreed. Of all the complaints about the Shay threads, this has to be the most warranted.

No. 7000

>>6990
>>6993
it's because of IP cycling. no one is giving you someone else's ban, you're getting a banned IP.

No. 7001

Is this the right thread to post for a thread deletion?
>>>/snow/724405
If not please direct me to the right place

No. 7002

>>6961
Making fun of her fat bf, her laziness/alcoholism, and those creepy photoshoots and nitpicking isn't milk, and even that hardly makes up the majority of the posts. It's mostly just blogging whores, lame edits, and other shit that doesn't contribute to the discussion as anons have said here over and over again.

This is turning into an anisa 2.0 situation.

No. 7003

Please address the racist-chan(s) in /ot/. Every active thread is becoming a sperg zone about asians and I know I'm not the only person fucking tired of seeing it. I've hidden all the kpop/kpop/Asian bf autism and they still manage to leak into the vent and unpopular opinions threads.

No. 7004

>>7001
Why would it be deleted???

No. 7006

File: 1541072418640.png (140.42 KB, 1194x334, spam.png)

What is happening at the end of this thread?
>>>/snow/290770
Are we getting spammers now?

No. 7007

>>7006
It happens periodically. Just report them when they pop up so we can remove.

No. 7008

>>7004
>>7001
some anons over there are being little bitches because they don't like the pic on the op… please ignore this, mods, youve got better things to do

No. 7009

>>6990
Happened to me as well, but mine was from a post from 2014 iirc (I deleted the screenshot I think). I was gonna post about it here but I figured it must have just been a random fluke.

No. 7010

>>6969
This sum bullshit. I mean the "no contribution" in /pt/ alone are ridiculous, since no one can sage anything.

Honestly, shouldn't it be the other way around at this point? /pt/ threads are the only ones that don't stagnate because there's constant conversation going on since noone can sage. But threads in /snow/ and other boards die slow deaths because everyone sages every. fucking. post. and then jumps down everyone elses throats for not sage-ing, even if it's perfectly relevant discussion.

I'm so tired of seeing shit like:
>person posts perfectly valid analysis or discussion on topic of thread
>sum anon: that's just ur opinion sage ur autism!!!!!!

This website is a goddamn mess. Change the fucking sage rules so that we can have actual discussion. It just leaves room for spergs to invalidate every opinion and minimod the fuck outta every thread by jumping down everyone's throats for posting something they disagree with.

No. 7011

File: 1541196514528.png (233.66 KB, 1100x358, Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 4.58…)

>>6983
>>6984
Ok but again, what are the fucking parameters for being in /pt/? Honestly it would just be easier to make a separate board for Onion and Moo at this point and move all their archives over since they're the only ones that are ever allowed there anyways, and if you even try to look through the catalogue it's all just their previous boards. (Not everyone is obsessed with them as the mods apparently are, some of us are tired of them and want to talk about other cows.)

TND has had 20 active threads before this one got moved to /pt/, which is more than Vicky or Dasha or basically anyone in /pt/ other than Moo or Onion. How is that not considered milky enough for you, meanwhile you've still got shit like this in /pt/

No. 7012

>>7011
Why are you using a clearly banned and locked thread as an example? Can you not read?

No. 7013

File: 1541198894777.png (429.63 KB, 1117x713, Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 5.43…)

>>7012
>Can you not read?
Where does it say it's locked my dude? It hasn't been deleted and still exists in the catalogue among the other 800 previous Moo and Onion threads, but people get butthurt when a legit cow they don't know about gets moved to /pt/ because they don't feel like catching up on the drama and it gets in the way of their precious Moo obsession

No. 7014

>>7013
>lock symbol next to thread title

You're just embarrassing yourself now, newfag.

No. 7015

>>7013
>Where does it say it's locked my dude?
IDK, maybe the little LOCK icon?

>It hasn't been deleted and still exists in the catalogue

No threads are ever deleted on lolcow unless it's illegal or spam.

Could you be any more of a blatant newfag? Lurk more before you post your next complaint.

No. 7016

>>7014
>>7015
nta anon but I also didn't know that, cause I've only ever seen the phrase "locked" when a thread is reaching max capacity, and then I just move on to the next thread. I've literally never noticed the lock icon before on threads. Also
>lock symbol next to thread title
>LOL WOW CAN U READ??
Doesn't even make sense and seems unnecessary. "Read" implies there a word there to be read, and there's not. Calm down.

>No threads are ever deleted on lolcow unless it's illegal or spam

how is this that thread not considered spam though?(samefagging)

No. 7017

>>7011

/pt/ contains legendary cows that earned a special status on the site by either abusing it or being consistently milky for many many years. /snow/ is for lesser cows. Not every snowflake needs to be in /pt/, it's not a badge of honor for amazing threads but for terrible people who have had consistent milk for a very long time.


>Victoria

Spammed the site for weeks, tried to sue lolcow but sent her C&D to Kiwifarms instead, has been a cow for 10+ years

>Dasha

Abused the shit out of lolcow for her personal vendetta

>Mystery.jpg

Posted frantically and insanely on lolcow for years before clashing with farmers on the discord and revealing herself to be a 4chan camwhore despite her frothing rants about sex work

>Momokun

was actually moved back to snow for a while due to thread quality sinking, mod obsession where? Some users actually claim that mods hate the Momokun threads because they didn't get moved to /pt/ for so long

>Margaret

Raised one of the most famous weeb cows, insane conspiracy-spewing narcissist turned sex worker on the run

>Raven Sparks

faked her suicide to get lolcow to stop talking about her, married her son's best friend

>Doe Deere

Owner of "the internet's most hated beauty company", decade-long scammer and skinwalker

>Luna

Grave-robber junkie who still someohow manages to get away with begging for drug money online

>Kiki Kannibal

>Pixyteri
>CWC
Legendary, period


Some of the threads are dated, inactive or could be milkier but why don't you just report them?


>it's all just their previous boards.

"board" refers to /pt/ and /snow/. The word you're looking for is "thread".


>>7016
You're just nitpicking now because you didn't know threads could be locked, so instead of realizing you missed a major part of this board you're complaining it wasn't spoonfed well enough to you. I see a lot of Farmhand comments saying something like "I'm locking this thread because of XYZ", so maybe you just don't read this place enough.

>how is this that thread not considered spam though?

Spam as in advertisement, word spam, etc. This is just a shit thread. They're always kept around in case it later turns out it was a vendetta, samefag making several threads, the cow themselves, etc. Again, something you'd be able to differentiate if you just lurked more.

We need a new hellweek to get rid of all the newfags shitting up the place.

No. 7018

File: 1541207092974.jpg (43.05 KB, 411x472, 4698765.jpg)

>>7013
>>7016
holy shit the newfaggotry in this thread

No. 7019

>>7017
jfc thank you! some anons and newfags really dont understand why some cows are corralled where they are or what even milk is.
>tfw newfags want to boolie mods and admin

No. 7020

Could the infighting rules be more specific? I feel like some anons report anyone that doesn't agree with them or challenge their opinion as infighting because the rule is so vague. I don't think it's okay for people to present an aggressive opening post and when people take part in debating them, the original butthurt anon can just report it as infighting and get everyone banned.

Derailing with racebaiting for 150 replies is an obvious case but someone being a retard and 7 people responding to the anon to explain why they're retarded isn't really infighting in my opinion, but you can still get banned for it. Especially if it's still within the original subject matter or the thread is sort of free-for-all.

No. 7021

Can someone do something about that newfag in the omocat thread? She keeps bumping it just to screech about yaoi

No. 7022

Hellweek when. (and please don't say 'coming soon!' again)

No. 7023

New round of farmhand applications?

How about addressing the basic concerns that have been repeated over and over in this thread first, regarding the culture of the site and user feedback and general interaction from staff as opposed to this weird “we’ll speak to you when we deign” shit that’s been going on since the most recent admin took over.

Hellweek when? Townhall when? This was all proposed MONTHS ago, most of your decent posters have left the site in exasperation at this point. What now, more shitty mods chosen from the pool of absolute faggots left on the site?

Admin, hand over the keys. It’s long past time.

No. 7024

>>7020
This was nowhere near such an issue before staff went all facebook and banned “minimodding” - culture used to self enforce, now we have tone police. On a Chan board. Lmfao.

No. 7025

>>7024
Sorry to double post but like - we’ve literally seen permabans and long bans for people just being cunty about staff and modding. It’s pure faggotry on staff’s part and admin clearly doesn’t have a background in any of this. See also - nuking threads over absolutely worthless legal threats, choosing the site provider we have, assembling a tiny team of mods and paying server fees themselves to these retards. Enough is enough.(samefag)

No. 7026

>>7023
Yeah agreed, nobody decent is going to wanna staff for this admin. Sorry.

No. 7028

>>6980
Would work if mods actually moderated but they don’t and when they do half the time it’s either inconsistent, unclear, or just cunty.

No. 7029

>>7010
Is there a single thread left anywhere on the site where “hide all unsaged posts” is useful?

Just get rid of sage entirely at this point. It is not serving any purpose other than causing spergouts. It doesn’t stop people from necro-ing and flags a thread as having new real milk about 2% of the time.(samefag)

No. 7030

>>7020
>>7024

Also, mini-modding is a rule on /pt/ and /snow/ only. Why are anons being banned for it in /g/ and /ot/?

No. 7031

>>7025
why'd this anon get banned for samefagging when she clarified she was doing it in her post…?

she was right too, you guys are faggots.

No. 7032

>>7016
>>7025
>>7029

what farmhack pissy baby bans people in the fucking complaints thread?

No. 7033

>>7031
>>7032
just because you say samefag doesnt give you a pass to fucking do it you mongs. crybabbies get all pissed off mods arent doing anything but shit yourself when they do because its not tailored to you.

hell week is going to be fucking beautiful.

No. 7034

>>7033
So replying to your own post to add something you forgot to mention in it constitutes a ban now? That's retarded

No. 7035

>>7034
yes faggot, delete the first post and repost it the added content. are you fucking retarded?

No. 7036

>>7035
Are you retarded? Why are you this fucking pressed? It doesn't make a difference wether you remake or reply to your post. You don't even have an option to do the former if you wanted to add something 30 minutes after you posted it. Hop off the shitty mods' dicks for a second.

No. 7037

Petition to have a Fight Club thread in /ot or something? It would be served as an empty basement for otherwise infighting to take place. Some wasteland you can redirect people who wanna reeee to. Won't require a lot of staff attention. I think it will decrease the amount of inconsistent random needless bans and subsequent crytyping.

No. 7038

>>7037
I actually think that is a good idea

No. 7039

>>7037
better idea: instead of shitting up /ot/, bring back /manure/

No. 7040

>>7036
Yeah, as if you'd know but
>>7025
>>7026
>>7028
>>7029
>>7024
>>7023
are all the same person samefagging, have a nice day.

No. 7041

>>7040
Cool. While you're here, care to address some of the fucking complaints itt?

No. 7042

>>7041
Anon, this is in no way supporting the farmhand, but they never take care of shit here. All they do is ban to solve things instead of listening to the people who use the website.

No. 7043

>>7041
Sure. /manure/ never worked out so that's probably not a good solution in the first place. As of right now I see dishonest ban evading,samefagging and infighting in the thread. All prior complaints have been taken care of for the most part.
>>7037
Containment threads don't work, see tempcow and the manhate thread.

And then we have anons mad that they're getting "no contribution" bans for nothing but extremely nitpicky posts.

Racebait has always been against the rules, several threads in /ot/ have been locked for this reason.

No. 7044

File: 1541376143513.jpeg (343.34 KB, 1447x750, 5F31354F-8A50-497E-9316-66D95C…)

>>7041
I guess that’s a no.

Samefagging is pretending to be different people, I apologized for doubleposting more than once, and one of those posts isn’t even mine. I haven’t been here in a minute since the place has become a trash fire. I’m catching up on meta.

Are you trying to prove the point about farmhands being cunts towards criticism and not even understanding basic Chan terminology, or?????

Inb4 ban evasion, nobody gives a fuck.(ban evasion)

No. 7045

Glad to see the farmhands are really stepping up. It's not like we have a new racebait argument in /ot/ every day in the Unpopular Opinions/Vent threads… /s

No. 7047

>>7044
I wasn't agreeing with the farmhand, I was the other anon she replied to. I only said that in hopes she would shut up about it and do something productive instead of attempting to expose some rando for what she deems samefagging.

>>7043
So that's it? Of the dozens of criticisms and suggestions itt those were the only two you could take care of?

No. 7048

>>7043
I hope you get dropped you're acting like a cunt.

No. 7049

>>7048
have you read the current admin's few and far between posts in meta? I'm half convinced the current farmhands are their wranglers or something, unlikely any of them will ever be "let go"

No. 7050

plz nuke /ot/

thanks

No. 7053

File: 1541461356639.jpg (176.75 KB, 1392x1758, b&.jpg)

>>7048
Agreed. Admin really knows how to pick 'em, huh?

>>7043
So were you the same farmhand from the shayna thread who felt the need to temp ban and redtext me for for pic related? Might wanna go fix that typo on the redtext by the way, retard. "take it meta" doesn't sound quite right.

No. 7054

>>7053
>getting this mad about a 5 minute time out

No. 7055

>>7054
I am pretty annoyed, yeah. It shouldn't have happened. The other anons who got banned and redtexted for that mess didn't deserve to either. Of all the shit in that thread, currently the biggest dumpster fire in all of /snow/ chock full of derailing, blogging, and sperging, THIS was what got the farmhands' attention? foh. Seems like the reason why no one has done anything about that thread is because the mods are the same ones posting in it.

No. 7056

File: 1541466167924.png (2.05 MB, 1405x2864, rules.png)

Here's my question: do the mods actually read the rules at all? I'm tired of seeing the same sage-sperging anons throwing a hissy fit over everything and red-text/ban happy mods screaming "read the rules!!" with no elaboration on every other post. So I did, I read the rules, and the usage guide and the "list of common terms for those with uncertainty over what constitutes a ban" on /pt/ and /snow/. I used the Poppy thread for example, since mods are extra ban-happy over there right now, but I've seen variations of this same selective banning/rule-ignoring everywhere.

If you're going to let your users mini-mod all over the place and stomp their feet at LEAST make your rules cohesive. If you are going to ban whoever you feel like that day for not saging relevant discussion or whatever, at least make that an actual rule. Because right now, it's not.

I'm sure I'll get banned for this since mods are just banning whoever they feel like at this point but since they don't actually read their own rules I already did the work for you
>6. Do not try to harass, threaten, or intimidate staff.
This one miiiight work if you really stretch and consider this post "harassment".

No. 7057

>>7056
Are you the same samefagging sperg from upthread? Because I don't know how often Farmers ITT have to explain that reading the rules will probably answer your question. If you read the rules and don't see what those posters did to deserve a ban, then that's on you. Posting here isn't rocket science, other people can figure it out too.

No. 7058

>>7057
>upthread
I don't even know what thread this is

>Because I don't know how often Farmers ITT have to explain that reading the rules will probably answer your question

Hi, did you read a single part of my post at all? Because please, tell me what rules exactly are being broken in the examples I provided (what number rule would be even more helpful). Obviously I'm very dumb and need a smart anon like you to explain it!

No. 7059

>>7056

For months mods in this thread have been saying "Hi cow" is against the rules and that it would be added to the rules, but they haven't gotten around to it.

Also, mini-modding is against the rules on /pt/ and /snow/ only. Why are anons being banned for it in /ot/?

No. 7060

>>7059
Mini-modding is the only thing keeping /ot/ together tbh

No. 7061

>>7031
>>7033
>>7035
>>7040

Anon was double posting, not samefagging.

>Admin: don't say samefag when you mean doublepost

No. 7062

>>7056
The poppy thread is banhappy atm due to apparent Titanic selfposts. You seem to be trying to point out a contradiction in the rules by citing rule 3.6a, but it relates entirely to /pt/.

Anyway…

I personally wish minimodding was allowed back. I see no reason to stop the userbase from helping the site run day to day. Infighting is a separate matter.

On the upside, the Taylor thread has actually improved since it went to /pt/.

No. 7063

>>7055
>everyone who doesn't agree with me is a cow

You deserved the ban if you wanted to be another derailing sperg in the shay thread. If admin would actually hire good mods they would have banned you longer than 5 minutes. I bet you're also a ddlg bdsm degenerate who blogs too.

No. 7064

File: 1541476384553.png (128.79 KB, 1275x229, Screen Shot 2018-11-05 at 9.31…)

>>7062
Rules:
>3.6 If your comment doesn't add anything new to the conversation, sage it.
>3.6a Sage has been removed from /pt/ and may be removed from other boards in the future. In /pt/, do not write "sage" in any post fields (including the post body) and do not call out others for not sageing.
Board rules for /pt/ and /snow/:
>All global rules will be in effect unless otherwise stated.

Yes, I saw that as well but if that rule ONLY applied to /pt/, why put it in the "General Rules" section, and not the "Rules for only /pt/ and /snow/" section?
It also doesn't make sense for it to be a /pt/ rule at all.
>If your comment doesn't add anything new to the conversation, sage it
>you cannot sage in /pt/ at all
Basically
>if your comment doesn't add anything new to the conversation, don't comment
What they're trying to say is:
>in /pt/ where no one can sage, don't yell at people for not sage-ing
But the way the rule is actually applied in /pt/ is:
>You will get in trouble for commenting in /pt/ if we, the mods, decide your comment isn't contributing. However, what is considered a worthy "contribution" is totally up to us, and there are no real guidelines.

Guidelines we've been given for when something is a "bad post":
>it breaks the rules
>it's derailing
>it's a blogpost
Since there is no way to self-police (sage) in /pt/ long as it is not these 3 things, there should be no objections.

So then why are posts like pic related considered "no contribution"? What rule is being broken here?

No. 7065

>>7063
>I bet you're also a ddlg bdsm degenerate who blogs too.
Why the fuck would I be here complaining about them if I was? Anons got banned for calling Gregory Gorgeous a man after an anon jumped in to WK him (who didn't get banned). I only made two posts in that thread: one asking why the people WKing him didn't also get banned for derailing and the one in the picture. I'd hardly call that sperging.

No. 7066

>>7065
fuck, youre a dumb one. making a post to only complain about derailment constitutes as derailment and the second was to shit on the mods. what contribution to lolcow milk was there?

No. 7068

File: 1541482687153.png (251.27 KB, 1430x1137, samefag.png)

>>7044
>>7040
It's almost just fun to point out how laughably bad Farmhands are at this point.
>Yeah, as if you'd know but
Yeah, why would we know? As far as we can see random people are getting randomly banned for reasons that don't follow any logic. This is what I meant in >>7056 when I say you need to give us actual explanation why anons were banned. You wouldn't have to be so shitty and passive aggressive towards your users if literally any of this was explained or labeled correctly.

>Rule 3: Adhere to board culture

>Board Culture: You have 30 minutes to delete a comment you've made. If you've made a typo or want to correct any part of your comment, copy the text, delete it, and re-post it. Do not double-post to correct yourself. Do not ask mods to delete your post if you missed the 30 minute window.
Of all the posts you listed as anon "samefagging", one was an acknowledged "double-post" ( >>7025 ) as defined by the rules, one was a "samefag" ( >>7026 )as defined by the rules, and the rest were responses to other people. Going just by the wording of the rules alone, there is no rule against responding to multiple people in multiple posts. There is only a rule against double-posting to correct yourself, and there's no way for us to tell if those posts were made within the correctable 30-min timeframe.

So this person got a perma-ban because…they "samefagged" one time, according to you? I guess we just take your word for it.

No. 7069

File: 1541482717419.png (627.19 KB, 563x1214, farmhand.png)

>>7068
Hi it's me again! Not a samefag because I'm telling you I'm double-posting, and not breaking any double-posting rules because I'm not making a correction to my previous post, I'm making a separate new contribution to the thread. (Which also means I don't have to sage, according to the rules). Wheeeee(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 7070

>>7069

stop being so autistic

No. 7071

>>7069
No but really like….what rule was broken here? They hurt your feelings? No criticism allowed in the complaint thread?

No. 7072

>>7068

And anon said "one of those posts isn’t even mine" which I can believe since other anons have reported being banned for samefagging and ban evasion for posts that were not theirs.

>there's no way for us to tell if those posts were made within the correctable 30-min timeframe.


You can see the time stamp by clicking the "x minutes/hours/days/months ago" notation.

The rule against double posting is unfair because of a known site bug. In the last thread a few anons on mobile reported that they have been unable to delete their posts within 30 minutes.

No. 7077

>>7066
>making a post to only complain about derailment constitutes as derailment
Okay, so why didn't the other anons doing that get banned? The only anons who did get banned were the ones who rustled the farmhand's jimmies. Not the libtards crying about transphobia, not the other anons bitching about derailing, none of the kink spergs, none of the regular camgirls who shit up that thread, none of the a-logs, nitpickers, or blogposters, just the anons who rustled farmhand's jimmies

No. 7079

>>7077
the farmhand literally called it "trans hate", For the sperg anon saying they don't find an mtf to be less uggo than a biological female. We get it infighting but they should have both been banned, especially when there clearly still is an anon in the thread going "STFU THIS ISNT A TRANS HATE THREAD" for anyone saying boy instead of woman/girl.
It was really strange to see a farmhand react like a tumblrite down to cringe ban prompt.

No. 7083

>>7079
The fact that the same farmhand was an illiterate who didn't even know how to link threads on other boards correctly makes me certain she's new.

No. 7084

File: 1541558914794.png (75.49 KB, 800x451, Screenshot_2018-11-06-18-46-59…)

>>7083

Are you talking about the link to the Gender Crit thread? There's nothing wrong with it.

No. 7086

>>7084
Mods can edit posts. She fixed it a few hours later.

No. 7087

Looking at this thread and the last thread -

>anons banned for rules that don't apply to their comment or to the board they're in

>anons being banned for another anon's comments
>anons banned without being redtexted or told why
>email appeals being ignored
>appeals in this thread being ignored

Did I miss anything?

No. 7088

Ok this was posted in pt, but for real I want a dr. Phil general ibthink this would be the only userbase to handle that kind of wacky

No. 7089

>>7088

What's stopping you from making a thread?

No. 7090

welp, admin's grabbed her parachute >>7078

No. 7093

>>7090
to the shock of literally no one itt

No. 7094

>>7090
to be fair, having to babysit a bunch of whiny gossiping girls with entitlement issues is an exhausting gig

No. 7095

>>7094
Don't do the job if you can't handle it then.

No. 7097

A few of the threads like the Gaijin in Japan thread have a lot of same fagging or vendetta(posting random people in japan with no context at all.) I’ve reported it a few times but now I’m wondering if reports get looked at or what constitutes a report.

No. 7098

>>7095

Why don't you apply and try to do a better job?

No. 7099

>>7098
>>7095
>>7094
>Infighting about nothing of substance even on /meta/

Admin said she realized she's too busy. But let's stay salty and insinuate random things instead of being happy she's handing the site over to someone more active. Like Anon said, write your own damn application.

No. 7100

File: 1541630229464.jpg (34.64 KB, 515x341, you_win_prize_downs.jpg)

>>7095
…She's literally giving it away and you're still trying to be snarky by WeLl DoNt Do It ThEn iF u CaNt TaKe tHe HeAt. Good go Sherlock, very original, you indeed were able to read and at least partially understood admin! Maybe now you can graduate high school at the age of 25!

Congratulations, you won the biggest retard poster price of the month!

No. 7101

What exactly is a no contribution post? Cause at this point it seems like it can be anything that isn't a screencap.

No. 7102

>>7101
Examples were linked in my initial post. Pointlessly nitpicking physical appearance for the umpteenth time and posting movie quotes does not equal contribution.

No. 7103

>>7102
Are you referring to your post in the Onion thread? Cause you said more here than you did in that one.

Anyway, thanks.

No. 7105

File: 1541641987319.png (30.28 KB, 772x129, screenshot.png)

>>7103
Yes, I am.
Kindly consider learning how to read, then.

No. 7106

>>7105
Why the snotty attitude? I thanked you for the clarification, holy shit.

No. 7107

>>7098
>>7099
>>7100


Because I don't want to run a gossip website. If you're going to sign up to be a moderator, at least be able to handle it without being snarky and ban-happy. You guys took my post like I was trying to be mean, but it's the truth: if you feel like you cannot handle it, don't even try it.

No. 7108

>>7107
>If you're going to sign up to be a moderator, at least be able to handle it

Mods and admins have lives too, despite contrary belief lol

No. 7109

I hate to be this person but the Amina thread is filled with speculation of her personal friends who aren’t involved any drama and private information like full name, names of family members have been posted as well. I’ve reported and the thread is in autosage but the same people keep bumping it without milk. It reminds me of the Gaijin in Japan thread because of the amount of A-logging or random bumping. Am I excessively reporting?

No. 7110

>>7109
Sorry to double post but the Shiena thread which has been taken out of auto sage is also filled with people posting her mom’s private Facebook and saying that they’ve been contacting her mom. I just feel like this goes too far and is beyond gossip.

No. 7111

>>7109
You can't bump a thread on autosage. That's the entire point of autosage.

No. 7113

>>7108
My original complaint was with the banhappy farmhands, not the admin themselves. This is like having a shitty uber drive who gets overwhelmed in high-traffic areas–don't do it if you know you won't be able to handle it.

No. 7114

Can we move the Dasha thread to snow? It's literally just a bunch of teenagers commenting on photos of Dasha and saying she's ugly. There's no milk and they don't even point out her Mina copying anymore, they just bitch about what she normally wears. Her statuses haven't been milky for ages. She's crazy so threads should def be up if she does something crazy again, but I'm getting bored of going in there and it's the same bunch of people being like omfg she's so ugly over and over again.

No. 7115

>>7108
yeah, but they don't get paid for this so they literally don't have to do it. they have no excuse to suck at it. half-assed volunteers may as well quit.

No. 7116

>>7105
this cunt right here needs to be purged.

No. 7117

>>7107
Agreed. The site has been hurt because it's been run poorly by people with no experience and no investment in maintaining the culture that made lolcow unique. Sorry if that hurts people's feelings, but admin and staff have alienated a segment of the core user base and invited a horrible breed of newfags to infest the boards. A lot of advice and support was offered and ignored or dismissed. And that dismissiveness came from a place on undeserved arrogance. I don't care about the reasons why admin couldn't do the job well. If you are not up to the responsibility, don't do it. If you don't want to do the job, then don't do it. There are dozens of users who want to help and actually care about the site who are more than capable of doing the job.

No. 7118

>>7109
I make reports with one word 'family' or else 'unrelated person'. I find those reports get responded to almost 100%.

>>7110
Are you actually visiting Shiena's current thread anon? >>>/snow/671659 It was created 2 months ago and has been fine, no-one's trying to contact her mother. Shiena is now back in Canada. It really sounds like you're looking at the previous thread.

No. 7119

Different farmhand here to make some people aware, we have not made any big changes to staff in the past while. Finding new mods in general is a very hard task, we can not just add any person. So this will take a while.

There has been serious issues with samefags lately, so yes, it can be slightly frustrating. We are a very small team with busy schedules, getting through reports can take hours and mistakes happen. Like I said we are trying our best to find mods that won't abuse all the information a site like this has.

To also clear something else up, I am the mod who wrote out the terminology post. I noticed a lot of anons jumping on 'doubleposting' being not a image board term, they are correct. I added it hoping it would help newfags understand easier to not post multiple times in a row. This shouldn't be a bannable offense and if that has happened I am sorry and I will clear it up. Though it is still encouraged to delete your original post if it is to fix typos and small things.

No one of the mod team is new to image boards.
I can try to answer some questions, but since change is coming soon it may not matter anyways.

Also kek at the anon who thinks we are possible handmaidens/trannies. We still have to ban people even if they align with our own views and not ban others who have ones we don't agree with. Stick to /ot/ threads with those subjects, they do not belong in /pt/ or /snow/ and only cause infighting.

No. 7120

>>7119
Yeah I'd rather you guys take the time to find someone trustworthy rather than add some random person who may try to doxx everyone.

No. 7121

Mods deleted the other pics of her kid but not this one. Why not?

>>>/pt/594105

No. 7122

>>7121
They might have missed it, it's gone now.

No. 7123

>>7114
There has been a fuckton of nitpicking for the past 2-3 Dasha threads. I think mods have already told them to chill but they go right back at it an hour later.

No. 7124

>>7114
>>7123
I'll bring it up to see what can be done, but no promises on any moving threads to /snow/.

No. 7125

>>7123
Yes definitely and I find that mods do try to ban people for nitpicking but I've reported some reaaaally retarded OT nitpicking before in there and it goes unnoticed.
As we speak they are going on about Dasha's flat ass.

No. 7126

>>7125
Also just to clarify I'm not whiteknighting Dasha, I enjoy the drama, but the only thing in there that is slightly milky is the fact that she's buying followers. That to me is worth talking about.

No. 7127

The Micky thread in snow is erupting in samefagging and infighting.

She's trying to get her own thread locked/autosage

No. 7131

>>7127

In both threads. Can the old thread be locked?

No. 7132

>>7119
Sorry, but adding new terminology is a really bad idea imo. It doesn't make sense to oldfags and ends up fucking with board culture when people refer to it to argue with them.

No. 7133

>>7132
>doesnt make sense

are you so autistic that you cannot grasp the basic concept of doubleposting?

No. 7134

>>7133
No you retard, adding new terms randomly.

It's obvious what doubleposting is meant to mean, but you can't just decide to add new terms on a whim regardless. Ffs.

No. 7135

>>7132

Which terms are new?

>>7119
>>7133

Apparently at least one mod doesn't understand the concept >>7025.

No. 7136

Despite reporting, the Momokun thread has nothing but off topic infighting about fucking payment options in Japan?

If I'm going to be honest, I stopped posting recently because it seems a cluster of newfags want to nitpick everything and not talk about Momokun. They don't contribute to the thread with actual information and are too lazy to make dummy accounts so they sit with their hands up their ass waiting for someone else to carry the thread.

No. 7137

>>7134
I'm sorry, but in like the 10 years I've been using image boards I have never seen it used in a way to say you are posting a second post to fix or add onto your old one. I think I started seeing it used here only about a year or two ago.
Samefagging has always been used to call out someone who is pretending to be multiple different people to bump their threads or agree with themselves.
I can retract the term, but it won't change that people are using samefag incorrectly.

>>7136
I'll get on that.

No. 7138

>>7137

Your fellow mod is using "samefag" incorrectly >>7025.

No. 7139


No. 7140


No. 7141

>>7140
The anon used 2 different IPs to samefag, so both were marked. I'm not going to redtext every single post they made. I hope you know what samefagging means, because different post numbers mean nothing.

No. 7142

>>7137
>>7137
Can you confirm to me whether it's one user who insists doubleposting and samefagging are the same thing? I know it's not allowed but it's something I have to minimod people on all the time. because I feel like that would help me understand whether it's just one retarded stubborn user or whether we're infested with imageboard newfags.

Why can't people get it through their head that no one needs to know whether you posted consecutively! You don't need to announce it at all because that removes your anonymity! Doubleposting is redundant here because as a term it comes from forums, where by default you have a username. As long as you're not arguing with or talking to yourself it doesn't fucking matter whether you post two times in a row. Stop announcing it!

No. 7143

>>7141
What? How can you tell they're the same person if they had 2 different IPs?

No. 7144

>>7143
Not farmhand obs but lots and lots of ways, cookies, session data, browser etc. There are lots of things you can cross reference and be reasonably sure you have the same user. GIYF. Back when Kiki had her her gore spergouts she was using a VPN and therfore had a million different IPs and farmhands still figured out she was the same poster.

No. 7145

>>7119
>>7122
>>7124
>>7137
Not sure if these are all the same Farmhand, but just wanted to say thanks for actually addressing our concerns here.

>>7102
>>7105
This attitude needs to go.

No. 7146

>>7144
Ding ding ding ding!

>>7145
There has been a few farmhands in here. There is a lot happening right now. Change is coming so things are a little hectic, but things will get better.

No. 7147

>>7146
>things will get better.

Please don't. I'm sure you mean well, but current admin (and quite a few FH) really fucked things up. A lot of the damage is going to be long-term, and as noted by others, a lot of older posters seem to have given up and left.
I hope our new admin isn't a ghost, and actually understands what the board is and the culture it used to have. I hope the new farmhands aren't such dicks, and are more involved. And I am very wary of these 'thread mods' because that is a giant sign saying Come on down! to all the obsessive posters that act like they own the thread (manhate anon upthread has been trying to get made boss of that thread for what, a year now?), the cancerous anons who just don't get it (JSBS OP for the last few threads) and randoms who want to troll it up.

Also, I'm begging for the mini-modding rule to be relaxed or removed. Users used to do a lot of the work for staff. Now we get staff saying they're overwhelmed and overworked, and of course they are because fucking admin and the clique made it this way.

I love LC but it has been absolute shit this year. So please don't say it will get better unless you have a magic wand or something.

No. 7148

>>7147
Don't know if you didn't notice anon, but in the application thread admin said we are looking for a new admin. Hence why I said changes were coming.
I personally agree with the mini-modding thing, but honestly making any changes right now isn't a great idea until we get a new admin in and comfortable. A admin who has much more time to put into the website.
We have had issues recently, but we all did/do really care for the site and would like to see it improve, which of course means hard decisions.
I don't think I have much more I can say about this subject due to not having more info to give yet.
If there anything else you want cleared up feel free to ask though.

No. 7149

>>7147
Mostly agree but there are some things that I think personally snowballed into the problems we see now

Around a year and a half ago, maybe two, everyone became obsessed with sage and for some reason the mods started enforcing this weird shift in thinking. Prior to that there were no saged posts, no one announced sage, no one minimodded for users to sage, it was basically a completely unused function. I have personally always been of the opinion that sage is pointless on an imageboard with such low traffic, and no pruning. The function of sage is to stop shitposts autopruning good but low traffic threads. Every thread stays up here, there is literally no point in it here.

When this happened, people started using
>Sage your shit
as a way to police what other users posted about, and to begin with people would say this in response to legitimate topics of discussion, but it just wasn't what they wanted to talk about personally. Then it escalated into being used to start derailments and infighting and the farmhands for the most part backed this shitty behaviour up instead of policing it. The website cannot only consist of content, there has to be discussion as well and the definition of "posts making no contribution" became way, way too wide. None of these decisions made any sense. Instead of banning the users who randomly became obsessed with using sage to police the topic of discussion they appeased them. You should never try and appease that type of poster, it makes the site bad! People who can't understand threads can have more than one topic of conversation simultaneously are retarded and shouldn't be listened to.

Also people who respond to bait are never visibly redtext banned and that's retarded as hell. Posting bait is an honoured imageboard tradition, responding to bait makes you a shitter. Likewise with shitposting.

No. 7155

Hi mods and farmers, has anyone else noticed that a lot of 1 - 3 year old threads in snow are getting necro’d recently with irrelevant comments? Normally I wouldn’t notice, but it seems to be happening much more often. I’m tinfoiling that someone is trying to bury another thread by bringing attention to others, but maybe I’m reading too much into it and it’s just bots or something. Just thought I’d ask. Thanks for everything you do!

No. 7156

Can we start outright banning the nitpicks in the Moo thread? It feels like its the same person over and over again too from the way they type and how farfetched their tinfoils and nitpicks are every time. It just clutters up the place and starts arguments. At least can we get another warning about it? Saying how people should dress up to go on planes or how they should wear makeup for other people's sakes because of how bad her bare face looks is not milk. Observations I get, but they keep going into a lot of detail about WHY this nitpick is important and its stupid.

No. 7157

Can the definition of cowtipping in the common terms sticky be moved to the top rather than the very bottom of the list?

It seems like a lot of people don't know what cowtipping is on pt, but they keep throwing around the term and asking people to clarify what it means.

No. 7158

>>7156
that dressing up on planes comment gave me cancer

>>7157
it would be great to see cowtipping highlighted, as it is our number one issue imo. some anons think selfposting caps of themselves arguing with the cow online is harmless.

No. 7159

Can a staff member keep a closer eye on the Momokun thread at the moment? There are dumbass anons in there trying to take down her instagram, they really need to be censored/temp banned. This is the stuff that has to be nipped in the bud right away.

No. 7160

>>7156
I stopped actively following the thread months ago due to the nitpicking, lack of milk and people posting more SSS/YandereJane/other costhots "roasting" Momo than Momo's actual endeavors. Visited it a few days ago, saw the anon spergout about cash/cards in Japan and left.

Also why are people so obsessed with getting her banned from all social media? The milk went dry the instant her Twitter was banned and her instastories are extremely boring and milquetoast.

No. 7161

Mods, there's been a beheaded woman in OT for 2 hours now

No. 7162

I reported someone's post for trying to use sage in /pt/, but you temp banned me with "you can't sage in /pt/ newfag". Uh yeah, I know, that's why I reported the post. Some of your farmhands can be really clueless.

No. 7163

>>7148
Yeah, I did notice. Just like I noticed previous admins and their ups and downs. Getting a new admin might mean nothing changes because it's another flake, or it might mean things take a shit because it's another Regina. If this admin hadn't done such a crap job, I'd have more confidence in their pick for who takes over. And since the new admin will be picking staff, same thing applies - bad admin picks bad staff and then where are we.
I know changes are coming, I just take issue with the optimism of things will improve.

I appreciate you answering, and if you are who I think you are, I appreciate your work in these threads thus far. Nice to have at least one responsive team member who does seem to genuinely care about the site.

>>7149
Sage is kind of retarded. If it was used as intended, it would be pretty good. As it is, yeah, it went south real quick because of course it did. Fucking fags.
You raise some important points. I didn't mean to put it all on staff, there has been an influx of newfags who just don't fucking care as well as some of the more retarded oldfags getting out of control, and as you say staff have sometimes appeased them rather than cleaning it up.

No. 7164

can I please have my duplicate posts deleted? it's telling me incorrect password when I try.
>>730965
>>730964
>>730963

No. 7165

>>7161
It's still up

No. 7166

>>7161
It's been 8 hours now. Does "Looking for:…" mean that you no longer have any staff at all?

No. 7167

getting rid of sage in /pt/ was a huge mistake because now people get bans for "no contribution". how the fuck are we supposed to discuss stuff and have conversations if the threads are so horribly modded?

No. 7168

>>7167
Sage wouldn't help PT at all. It would make it worse because then people would complain about it not being used right. Tbh, they should auto sage posts when someone replies to a main post. This should be automatic. Usually replies to posts are just replying without new info and if new info is added in, oh well. Its saged. Same with photo dumps. If you reply, when its the rule already to sage between first and last, that would be helpful too. It does it already for you.

On another note, a lot of shit is no contribution. The nitpicks are fine here and there. Don't try to argue your nitpick or dive into a huge amount of detail about it because no one cares, its a nitpick. Same with trying to dispell people's opinions and argue over stupid shit like currency in Japan in the Moo thread. None of that is helpful. From a mod perspective, one or two insights about it should be fine, but when it gets out of ahand and st arts derailing, bans should be given or warnings. It makes sense. I don't know why people keep trying to argue it.

No. 7169

>>7166
10 hours.

No. 7170

>>7169
reminds me of when they'd leave cp up for hours at a time. pathetic.

No. 7171

>>7161
This is actually fucking atrocious. 10 hours.

No. 7172

>>7171
This is disgusting.

Also, a word to the wise for the current Admin; I know he will probably attempt to worm his way in here, but please don't give anything to Joshua Moon. He has no right to expand past his current autistic territory of Kiwi Farms.

No. 7173

>>7168
was thinking more about how bans or warnings are given to shoop/art anons for no contribution now when they weren't before? it just seems stupid.

No. 7174

>>7173
some are just getting sick of one anon posting the same type of image over and over, such as the hdr anon in the greg threads, like we got it 100 images ago.

No. 7176

Can we get some parity restored between the Isa Sparks thread and the Lola Tyrrell thread please? In other words, I'm asking for the Isa thread to be unlocked.

The Lola Tyrell thread is poor quality; more than half the posts in there seem to be several anons who know her personally and want a space to vent. None of those anons are bothering to integrate, they've barely learned how to post and that was probably via bans and spoonfeeding of rules by staff. None of them know what milk actually is. Case in point, Lola made a post calling a friend 'girlfriend' and this was posted like it was an actual life event. They don't like her eyebrows, another example of "milk" posted there. Nitpicking's okay to an extent once the cow is in motion but it's hardly the foundation for a thread. One of these anons most likely started the thread i.e. it has been and remains a vendetta, with a few of us regulars on the side trying to work out what the fuck the milk actually is - and making tong jokes. It's not that I object to this thread existing, but it certainly needs work. It's interesting to compare to the Isa thread which started at the same time and which was rapidly locked.

The Isa Sparks thread was quickly locked for being a 'vendetta', but I'm the anon who started it and I'm a regular here (since the days of the first admin). I have no connection to her, I follow the Raven threads which is why I and the rest of us wanted the thread. Raven followers already know who all the players are in this situation. I have no vendetta. Not liking a cow isn't a vendetta and many a thread op has been written by such an anon. Yes, some anons fucked up by not capturing material before it was deleted, but I couldn't help that - the altcows thread was being derailed by this topic and we needed a separate thread quickly. We also talked about it in Thread Requests.

Nothing has ever come of that thread locking - say, the exposure of certain posters. The implication by a farmhand statement here in meta was this was being looked into as part of the locking.

Despite some suss posters feeding us information in and around that thread, the Isa thread was better-quality with more potential and more of a pedigree than the Lola Tyrrell one (which seems to enjoy next to zero redtext). And suss users feeding us information has happened in many threads here over the years. Why is that suddenly lock-worthy?

At this point, it's coming across like the thread locking was done for personal reasons by a staff member. If that isn't the case, make it clear to us. It's apparent that two different standards have been applied between two new threads of similar age, at any rate. Can a farmhand comment?

No. 7177

>>7169

What in the actual fuck. I reported it twice within the first hour it was up.

>>7172

I assume staff will be chosen in part based on their comment history. I doubt Null has been playing a long con of participating here. Besides, the only thing he has ever coveted was the domain name when KF went down.

No. 7181

>>7176
THIS. I'm glad I'm not alone being perplex about these weird decisions .As a long time Hagraven's threads lurker, I was pretty excited about the potential "Isa Saga" and I still don't understand how such a shitty thread like Lola Tyrell's is allowed (reeks of vendetta and full off underaged newfags unable to integrate) but not Isa's.
And the sudain deletion, whitout much explanation besides "reee vendetta!" even seems a bit suspicious in my opinion.
I would like to address it many times but my English isn't very good so, thank you anon.

No. 7182

>>7177
>>7172
>>7171
It's odd that it's still there and has been for many hours now, but a farmhand banned someone for a nitpick an hour ago.

No. 7184

>>7182
I've reported it a couple of times. Just goes to show that the current farmhands are here to be banhappy rather than actually listening to the people who use this website.

No. 7185

Can we get an Update on the Kelly Jean Situation? Can we make a thread yet or not?

No. 7189

Watch Dynastia be the next admin and then kill the site. Not even kidding.

No. 7190

>>7189
I seriously hope that's not the case Dynastia is a massive sperg on KF, the only reason Josh hasn't banned Dyn on the site is because they were faildoxed by some rando.

No. 7191

>>7189
>>7190

Your comments have been capped in the lolcow.farm thread.

No. 7192

The crazy man-hating bitches are shitting-up unpopular opinion (again)
They're agressive af with other women (how ironic, if I'd want to be insulted by autists I'd go to 4 chan) and incapable to stay in their own incel-tier containment thread.
I hope next admin permaban them

No. 7193

>>7191
I bet they haven't seen Dyn's namefagging essays he's posted on here lol.

Anyways, I'm glad the beheading thread is gone. Took too long.

No. 7194

File: 1542256294917.gif (583.74 KB, 391x250, pointsdontmatter.gif)

>>7149
Well put anon, I 100% agree with you. This is the kind of shit that makes 0 sense, and if you try to question the logic you get banned or called a newfag or "sage ur shit"-ed to death. I've been using image boards for close to 10 years now (including this one for about 3) and it wasn't until the past year or so I ever even saw the phrase "sage".

I also don't get this whole cry of "board culture!! if you question anything ur newfag get out!!" as it's been clearly pointed out several times here that none of the ACTUAL rules in place enforce or clear up any of that. How do you expect people to follow the rules or the "established culture" if there's no definitive guidelines on what any of that is anywhere?

Like this kinda bullshit >>7017
>/pt/ contains legendary cows that earned a special status on the site by either abusing it or being consistently milky for many many years.
>Not every snowflake needs to be in /pt/, it's not a badge of honor for amazing threads but for terrible people who have had consistent milk for a very long time.
This is laughable. There's literally no guideline for what gets to be in /pt/ vs /snow/. It's just the same 3 or so cows over and over and over again and that's about it. There's cows in /snow/ that are WAY milkier and have much more active discussion than Sheena Duquette or Fahr Sindram or Doe Deere or the million other dying threads on /pt/ under the weight of Moo and Onion.

Honestly at this point it would make more sense to just put Moo and Onion in their board, and then everything else on another. Cause that's basically all /pt/ is anyways. But either way this sage-nazing being touted as "board culture" needs to go.

No. 7195

>>7194

Splitting the board between threads about specific cows and threads about groups of cows (eg Taylor Nicole Dean vs Petubers) would make more sense than the arbitrary classifications of /pt/ and /snow/ we have now.

No. 7196

>>7192
this. all i want for christmas is an admin that will ban femcels and manhaters. most people on /ot/ and /g/ are fucking nuts now.

No. 7198

can we seriously do something about the excessive a-logging in /ot/ right now? I know you guys are short staffed but frankly things got out of hand over there.

No. 7199

>>7198
Same with /snow/. I personally think people like Natchan or Jilly what’s her face should be on /ot/ or have a more general thread. I’m tired of threads about people who were notable like 5-6 years ago have threads filled with a-logging or excessive nitpicking. I think the threads should be limited to people with recent drama rather than the rotation of threads being necro’d

No. 7200

>>7199
>>7198
do you guys know what a-logging is?

No. 7201

Why was an anon warned or banned for man-hate derailing? It wasn't specifically a man-hating post and it was in a thread titled dumbass shit. It was in no way more derailing than other posts in that thread.

It takes you like ages to ban incels and CP/gore threads posted by raiders, but you ban an anon for an innocuous remark?

No. 7202

>>7196
>>7192
I was called a man-hater and a femcel simply for pointing out that having 10 kids is excessive no matter what your location is and then was thrown a bunch of other insults. If anything, it's you anti femcels that are an aggressive bunch. I don't even know how you managed to translate, having 10 kids is too much into kill all mothers and people having kids.

Some anons were really vile. I don't even frequent the man-hating thread but whatever. I wish mods did ban you who managed to derail the thread into calling anyone that had a different opinion a femcel.

No. 7203

>>7202
stop.

No. 7204

On one hand, unpopular opinions in /ot/ contains a lot of autism and terrible opinions no one wants to see in other threads. So this is a good thing.

On the other, its basically becoming our version of the "Fuck You And Die" threads that were on SA. It is truly becoming obnoxious and makes myself and I'm sure other posters not want to contribute for fear of being dragged into a pointless, retarded flame wars that can span dozens of posts, and what's really terrible is you can stop posting and leave, but it won't stop, because there's too many anons taking the place of the defense and offense.

If its truly too much of a mammoth task to contain that kind of nuclear autism, i suggest the staff consider at least temporarily locking the thread and having a zero tolerance policy for taking it to other threads for the time being.

No. 7205

>>7201
It was reported by various anons as derailing and it is, nobody wants man hate to leak out into other threads. The anon was not perma-banned, just given a 30 minute warning.

No. 7206

>>7205
>It was reported by various anons
So was the beheaded woman… But that took you over 24 hours. Sometimes child porn also stays up for a few hours. Nice priorities you've got there.

No. 7207

>>7205
there's more manhate currently flooding the vent thread. can we just permaban these people? they seem to think they're a majority and we're the minority, despite their demographic being somewhat new. accusing everyone of being handmaidens is a pretty recent thing.

No. 7208

File: 1542316104763.gif (109.25 KB, 350x350, luck.gif)

I haven't posted here in long time. I was around since 2015 iirc, but stopped coming with time. Everything is so different now.
I've lurked a little the last couple weeks and I would like to give some suggestions to the new staff:

- Create more boards where you'd put threads by category.
i.e.
- Great Nippon related threads such as aidorus, cosplayers, the girls who prostitute themselves in Japan, etc
- A board for anons who pander to the alt right/left, fakebois or troons and the like. Basically the threads whose "cow" relies a lot on political issues
- A board for beauty/lifestyle and aesthetic focused threads, etc. You could add all the makeup gurus, the goth crew, and others.

You don't need to follow these categories. They're just suggestions, and you can find different categories to sort the threads out.
I just mean lolcow would be a lot tidier if you had more boards, and your farmhands would have an easier time.
I don't think /pt/ should be changed though.

- Please consider creating a "cemetery" board (similar to /manure/, but not only for bad threads, but for threads that are locked because they've reached post limit. It would make the catalog a lot better to navigate and more organized).
Basically, as soon as a thread died, it would be moved. No one would be mad people are saging dead threads with "no milk" because all inactive threads would have their own place. If you had "new milk" and wanted to know where to post it/if you should make a new thread, you could use the suggestion thread you guys currently have in /b/. Only active threads would be in the other boards, making it easier to find them/read them.

I believe my suggestion won't be considered because I know you've had /pt/ and /snow/ since the very start, but I do things these changes and more boards would help a lot.

Peace out and good luck!

No. 7209

>>7208
>the suggestion thread you guys currently have in /pt/*. Had to fix that, sorry.

No. 7210

>>7208
I like the idea of a "cemetery" board! It would be nice to have a more organized catalog!

No. 7211

>>7210
Either that or just have a search system for the catalog like a lot of chan archive sites do where you can search by title or body etc.

No. 7212

>>7211
>what is ctrl+F
Stop being new.

No. 7213

>>7210
we had that with /manure/ and /sty/ but both were met with a lot of protest by anons and subsequently forgotten. i agree that more boards would be good, however i think creating dedicated boards for different topics would also increase the amount of random new threads.

No. 7214

>>7208
It’s a long shot to think the gaijin in japan thread, which is an ESL shite hole, needs it’s own board. But the rest I think is a good idea. I like the idea of having more themed boards too

No. 7215

>>7212
ctrl+F often brings up shit results and old threads, but go off.

No. 7216

>>7214
Not only that thread, that's not really what I meant. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough, but I meant keep people who are tied by a specific trait in a separated board.

I don't really post here anymore so I don't know what these categories could be, but that's the general idea.

No random threads would pop up there because those boards would be used for discussion of people, not random topics. /ot/ and /g/ should stay imo, which is where these threads should go, and I don't really have anything to suggest when it comes to them.

>>7213
Yeah I remember but I think doing something similar right now would help a lot.

No. 7218

>>7207
The anons incessantly bitching about man hate are a minority, anon. It's very easy to ignore, I do it all the time. Report derailing, hide the man hate thread, and move on.

No. 7219

>>7218
yet you can't ignore this comment…

No. 7220

Onion brings attention to his new haircut as a "big reveal" and we can't talk about it? Really? It's nitpicking to talk about his new surprise?

No. 7221

>>7201
>>7220

It really feels like there's like, one or two Farmhands who show up every couple of weeks to ban everyone in sight. For some reason, Farmhands are much more concerned about nitpicking than cp or gore.

No. 7222

>>7220
>>7221
There are boards for female cows like Dasha and Momo where 80% or more of the posts are making fun of their looks/weight and criticizing their latest photos of themselves, but mods are really uppity about it in the Onision thread lately. I'm just not getting where the line is drawn anymore, and tbh it's coming across a little distasteful.
I feel like the occasional discussion of his new shitty haircuts, fat belly, age spots and whatnot are relevant (and funny) because he's constantly talking about how handsome and young he thinks he looks and how everyone else is ugly. It's probably half of what he talks about.

No. 7223

>>7220
>>7222
The constant nitpicking gets old. Onision isn't the only exception to this rule, it applies to moo, luna, and plenty of other threads in /snow/.
Threads in /pt/ are going to be held to a much higher standard, especially with a recent milk drop.
>>7221
I always see a mysterious mention of cp or gore without ever seeing it. Rarely, if ever.

No. 7224

>>7223

>Onision isn't the only exception to this rule


Did you word that as you intended? If his thread is an exception to the rule prohibiting nitpicking, then nitpicking is permissible.

>milk


His haircut is the milk.

>>7205

If man hate comments are not redtexted, anons don't know if the man hate anons were warned or banned which results in

- continuation of the man hate by other man hate anons
- minimodding by anons because they don't see mods responding to their reports
- infighting over the presence of man hate and over minimodding

Why are anons being banned for minimodding in /ot/? That rule is only for /pt/ and /snow/.

No. 7225

>>7223
>I always see a mysterious mention of cp or gore without ever seeing it.
Are you kidding?!

No. 7226

>>7224
Exactly, the haircut is milky af (showing his current mental state and lack of self-awareness) and admins are causing infighting with their bitching about nitpicking. It blows the whole thing up in the first place. Can't you see how toxic your unnecessary bans are?
>Inb4 go somewhere else!!!

No. 7228

>>7223
>>7225

I reported the beheaded woman twice within the first hour. When it had not been removed a few hours later I considered screencapping it to post in this thread to get the mods' attention, but I decided that would be pushy and surely the mods would take care of it soon enough.

How wrong I was to have faith.

No. 7229

Testing the glitch.

No. 7230

Testing the glitch.

No. 7231

>>7229
>>7230

I eventually got at 504 server error. Apologies for not copying the ray ID.

No. 7232

>>7228
i'd never paid attention to /meta/ until recently, but has the moderation situation always been as much of a shitshow as it is right now? seems like they're all in way over their heads.

No. 7233

>>7232
its always been a shitshow, butt after the first admin left it went downhill really fast.

he gave the website to some inexperienced female orbiter of his, and she invited all of her friends to be mods. Basically the only mods we get now are sperglords who are friends of friends with some other sperglords who at one point modded. Your application won’t be taken seriously unless they like you. so uh, GL to anyone who is actively trying.

No. 7236

>>7222
I completely agree. He made a video of him cutting his hair into a retarded style and we can't talk about his videos now, it seems. There is no way to tell where the line is drawn for what we can and can't talk about, and the staff won't bother trying to talk to us unless it's to defend themselves.

>>7223
So all of those reports that you got about the beheaded woman was just our imagination? All of the posts here mentioning it (and we sure as hell weren't the same person), was never really there?

No. 7237

>>7223
The beheaded women was up for 10+ hours and the farmhand didn't see it? What is wrong with this place…

No. 7238

>>7215
And what were you expecting a search function to do? Not search?

No. 7239

>>7223
>I always see a mysterious mention of cp or gore without ever seeing it. Rarely, if ever.
Oh fuck off, farmhand. Obviously you aren't doing your job when we report a beheaded woman MULTIPLE TIMES over a 10 hour period. Glad to see you guys are more upset about Onion's fee-fees getting hurt than gore being shown on the website. We might as well delete the general complaints thread since you don't fucking listen to any of the complaints and just ban people instead. What a joke.

No. 7240

Mods, can someone ban the whiteknight faggot in the Penny Underbust thread? It's clearly a neckbeard fan.

No. 7241

>>7223
Not sure why it's not okay to apparently nitpick onion but Dasha's thread has only become that.
Also, the cp gore thing does happen.
There was a beheaded woman wearing a blue top on here the other day.

No. 7242

>>7218
I'm >>7192 and it was the very first time I've adress my dissatisfaction with manhaters. Actually, I don't have much problem with you having your autistic thread as long as you don't leaking everywhere else and attacking other women for disagreeing with your insane positions.
And please, don't act like Lolcow always was a manhaters haven cause it's wasn't. Your shit is pretty recent (1 year maybe?) so, if you feel like you're so opressed by us, regular farmers/old fags, please consider making you're own female wizard board and take the incels you tend to attract (those who post CP and gore) with you.

No. 7243

File: 1542393445039.png (133.63 KB, 921x653, Screen Shot 2018-11-16 at 11.3…)

Just wanted to show every other anon in this thread where "complaining" in /meta/ gets you.

(I waited until my ban was expired to post this.)

No. 7244

>>7226
>the haircut is milky af
Yet screencaps from Lainey’s private Twitter isn’t milky?
The nitpicking in /pt/ over Greg being ugly, moo being fat, and Luna being shit at Makeup is annoying and makes it harder for others who read for the milk to read the thread. Instead of sperging out over a farmhand warning anons to stop derailing over another shitty haircut maybe take a break from posting.

No. 7245

>>7244
Our issue is that farmhands care more about addressing nitpicks rather than actual problems that have been brought up in this thread.

No. 7247

>>7245
This and that their attitudes are becoming real terrible. I think there was only one or two farmhands here who answered with understanding and patience, the others were pretty snobby.

If the staff would learn to communicate better(or at all )and toned down their attitude a little, a lot of issues with farmers could have been and would be avoided.

No. 7248

>>7228
>>7239
>>7242
You're forgetting we're understaffed quite a bit, if spam or cp is reported then we try to take care of it as fast as possible.
A goal would be to have a staff team with more diverse timezones to help with this sort of thing, sadly the majority of staff are american.
>>7237
Another farmhand took care of the gore that day.
>>7245
Nitpicks shouldn't have to be addressed since nitpicking has been against the rules. Granted every thread has nitpicking, but some threads have more of an issue with this obviously.

No. 7249

>>7244
I don't understand those of you who think stricter moderation based on your personal opinion of what's interesting are even here for. I prefer lolcow over shitholes like PULL because anonymity promotes more discussion. I regularly and legitimately prefer to scroll past a day's worth of discussion that I find uninteresting than refreshing a thread to find no updates at all.

No. 7250

>>7248
Mod, we literally reported that beheaded woman thread for an entire day before it even got taken care of, meanwhile MULTIPLE people had been banned for dumb shit throughout the day. Pay attention more, being "understaffed" isn't an excuse when you're still banhappy during that time.

No. 7251

>>7248
fucking pay attention to complaints and get your head out of your ass. no one is blaming you, all the mods have collective responsibility. quit if you're gonna put up a front on anon and cop an attitude.

No. 7253

Can someone define the manhate that ot is supposed to be so full of? Like, can't we say anything critical or negative about a man/men's behaviour before it's hate and has to be posted in a specific thread?
When does it become hate, that is what I'm wondering.

No. 7254

>>7253
I wonder this too. The post that was warned in the random bullshit thread wasn't even a man-hating post yet it managed to trigger so many anons apparently.

I find it ridiculous that with so many more important matters to attend to, they choose to focus on man-haters. It's stupid that any criticism of a man or men can be considered as man hate speech.

Can you even vent about a guy at work, or criticize a politician or an author for example, that happens to be a man? Because the site rules are not clear on that and as such it allows for arbitrary warning/banning.

No. 7255

>>7254
I just checked that thread and it's just an anon saying she is suspicous of men who talk about how crazy all their exes are. Seems like kinda normal wariness against projecting weirdos.

No. 7256

>>7255
yeah that's just common sense imo

No. 7257

>>7253
No joke. I feel as if any time you say anything remotely negative about men in /ot/ we get a massive amounts of "MODS CAN YOU PLEASE BAN THE FEMCELS IN THE X THREAD THEY'RE JUST RAMPANT" screeching in here after they themselves got into a derail lasting for 70 replies and hurt their feefees. I really never see actual aggressive man-hate outside of the containment thread either so I don't really get where all of this comes from.

No. 7258

Hey mods, since it took you a whole day last time to check the complaints, I figured I'd post directly to you here. There's two threads that were made in /ot/, one showing a rape scene from a film and the other a loli-looking character in a pornographic scene. One has been up for nearly an HOUR already. Maybe actually do something this time instead of letting it stay up for a whole day!

No. 7259

>>7258
they acted pretty swiftly considering they're understaffed. they're gone now, thankfully

No. 7261

>>7259
Glad to see they're doing their job.

No. 7262

>>7255
>>7254
>>7253
the issue is more with the mods who banned them then right?

No. 7263

>>7257
those anons consider someone saying "dump him" to an anon bitching about her shitty bf man hate lmao

No. 7264

>>7262

This. Even if the reports and complaints were filed as vendettas by men, mods should have an agreed upon standard by which to issue bans.

No. 7265

>>7263
God that's dumb, ladies don't dump your shitty bfs because that would be ~hateful~ towards them!

No. 7266

I can't believe all you idiots are falling for this shit. Bickering over "manhate" or "anti-manhate" is just fucking dividing the board. Both parties are fucking stupid, both of you have some false sense of entitlement and both need to shut the fuck up.

And for the love of god stop taking everything at face value.

No. 7267

File: 1542558964283.jpg (119.64 KB, 1852x470, image.jpg)

>>7242
>I'm totally an old fag you guys!
>don't act like Lolcow always was a manhaters haven cause it's wasn't. Your shit is pretty recent (1 year maybe?)
see pic. kek
are you new, a male, or both?

No. 7268

>>7267
>new, a male, or both?
You know the answer, sis.

No. 7269

>>7266
I don't even frequent the man-hating general and I don't have anything against it either, but I would like to know what constitutes man-hate if it can get you banned?

I was about to post something about Houellebecq in the book reading thread and talk about his misogyny as the central topic as well as his overrated style, but now I don't know if it's going to trigger anons or not.

So, yeah, I think it's important to have a discussion on what constitutes man-hate and tbh I find it ridiculous that we have to do that on an imageboard that is supposedly oriented towards girls.

I don't think any actual woman should have problems with women venting about men as long as it doesn't derail other threads.

And we never had problems or complaints about man-haters until recently.

Also, my suggestion is that femcel belongs to a r9k vocabulary and using a stupid term like that should warrant a ban because there are high chances that the poster belongs to that shitboard.

No. 7270

No ban for the repeat offender obvious self-posting male instigator in the Alt Cows thread?

No. 7272

>>7269
>Also, my suggestion is that femcel belongs to a r9k vocabulary and using a stupid term like that should warrant a ban because there are high chances that the poster belongs to that shitboard.
agreed. and idc if a small minority of women use it. there's no equivalence and it's stupid. robots and incels are the ones who want it to catch on, especially in female communities. i can see female 'foreveralones' using it ironically, but there is literally no equivalent since 'femcels' aren't out here murdering men for being deprived of dick and male attention.

No. 7273

>>7269
>I was about to post something about Houellebecq in the book reading thread and talk about his misogyny as the central topic as well as his overrated style, but now I don't know if it's going to trigger anons or not.

We shouldn't have to worry about triggering (probably male or troon) anons on a female dominated image board by discussing things like sexism in some writer's work. That's silly.

No. 7274

The last Gender Critical thread derailed into a massive man hate spergfest on the topic of war completely unrelated to troons. Mods did nothing. I know management has a hate boner for that thread for some reason, but it is not the place for general misandry.

No. 7275

I think that women on a women only board should be given the free speech to express their feelings about men.
No one on Wizardchan (a men's imageboard that explicitly disallows women) or 4chan (a male-dominated site) ever gets banned for woman hate or misogyny. They have the freedom to speak their minds and express their feelings. Why can't we have that?

Unlike the people on those two sites, we're also not nearly as vile. We don't post photos/videos of dead men and mock them, share creepshots of guys we've seen IRL, post tips on drugging and assaulting men, say underage boys who get raped "deserved it" or are liars, post rape/torture fantasies on pictures of random men and boys en masse, post photos of people's 7-12 year old sons and say shit like ">tfw no little bf" etc etc. "Man hate" in female dominated spaces doesn't result in mass killings, assaults, rapes or any even any real social detriments on men. Many of us have men who we love, respect and appreciate IRL. That doesn't mean many, many grievances about men as a collective aren't valid or worth talking about.

We should be allowed to say what we want about men, they certainly don't pull any (literal or figurative) punches with us, on any site they inhabit in large amounts. The only actual downside is that men who come here and read such posts will feel bad. However, according to the very rules of this site that explicitly disallow male posters, they shouldn't even be here, so it's not our problem.

No. 7276

>>7275
Well said.

No. 7277

>>7275
I think the issue is more that the anons who don't have problems with men are called out in a pretty rude, nasty way by anons who do. I don't spend tons of time in man hate or even gender crit threads, so I certainly don't see why you can't have them, or two or three or even ten threads about it.

Man hate does pop up in almost every thread, which is fine because I can scroll, but sometimes it looks like a lot of baiting going on.

I have a tinfoil that probably half the man hate is posted by trannies, which is ridic but there you go.

No. 7279

>>7274
Literally what? Acknowledging the fact that rapey autogynephilic translesbians are infested with male entitlement isn't really "misandry" and the thread is actually one of the few in /ot/ that doesn't get constantly derailed. Are you the person who's always whining about how they don't sperg about FTMs there?

>>7269
>Complaints about m-muh man-hate have skyrocketed after we started getting robot raids
Makes you think!

>>7275
All of this tbh

No. 7280

People started complaining about manhaters because you people burst in to every thread and annoy everyone with your insults to anyone who disagrees with you and derail them.

No. 7282

Just want to say I appreciate the farmhands and their contribution to keep this site running. I do not always agree with their moderation and at times share the exact same frustration as every other user in this thread but regardless I enjoy this site very much and hope to see it survive the incoming leadership changeover. I also appreciate fellow anons, especially us here that care enough to come to /meta/ to try and improve the site further.

No. 7284

>>7282
As much as it's just as frustrating to jani hate it's good to see that some people still have faith in the site. Thanks for the kind words anon.
>>7275
This is the general consensus with the man-hate thread but seeing anons constantly take bait from robots is the main issue with the topic aside from the occasional derailing in other /ot/ threads.
>>7264
We do have an agreed standard with ban lengths and ban offenses. Manhate derailing would be considered derailing a thread to say something that would better be suited for man hate. A good example would be gender crit like another anon said. The topics may be similar but they're not the same. >>7274

No. 7285

>>7275
You win lolcow

No. 7286

>>7284
men "take bait" on 4chan, just ban the maleposter, who cares if anons want to reply?

No. 7287

>>7279

>Acknowledging the fact that rapey autogynephilic translesbians are infested with male entitlement isn't really "misandry"


The derail had absolutely nothing to do with trans.

>>7284

But mods did not respond to the derailing.

No. 7288

>>7286
no, just no. only idiots respond to bait. people get banned for responding to bait because it's derailing it's not some big conspiracy.everyone derailing and infighting deserves their bans.
it's also not just "maleposters" because many times it's other anons baiting you. this is probably my least favorite argument on lolcow.

No. 7291

>>7270

Will a mod please step in? Anons continue to take the bait.

>>7284

You took the time to talk about this issue, but you couldn't actually address it in the Alt Cow thread?

Re your reply to >>7264, the original question was why the comment was considered man hate >>7254. Why did that comment, posted in a thread with no defined topic, warrant a ban when the derailing in the GC thread did not?

No. 7297

>>7286
Responding to bait is exactly what incels and robots want, this issue has been going on for a year now in the man-hate thread. Anons can't willingly take bait and expect mods to moderate their thread 24/7 to clean up their messes. It really just helps everyone to ignore and report.
>>7291
Sorry I misread, I didn't realize you were addressing alt-cows and not man hate specifically. Derailing in GC will result in a ban, the ban in the vent thread was red texted as an example of a post that would be better suited for man-hate. The anon was only given a warning as well.

No. 7299

Why cant we long term ban the sperg anons who keep making shit up and purposefully taking Instagram images from Moo to try and spread and derail the threads with false info? They constantly derail and this time its about pedophilia. Those anons, or anon, kerp trying to create canon issues by tinfoiling constantly.

No. 7300

>>7299
We're allowed to have discussions anon. You're starting to sound like a wk at this point. Nothing that any anons mentioned was taken "out of context", and it's fine if you disagree, but no one is making shit up.

No. 7301

champagne to the mods who volunteer and do their best

No. 7303

>>7297

I was addressing the derailing in both Alt Cows and GC.

The derailing in Alt Cows started on the 16th and didn't get red texted until today.

The man hate derailing in GC was never red texted, if it was addressed at all. A couple of anons called out the derailing comments, so they probably reported them too.

We're frustrated because, if mods are around and able to respond here, why are reports being ignored?

>the ban in the vent thread was red texted


The comment wasn't in the Vent thread, but it would be a better fit there than in Man Hate.

No. 7305

>>7300
Moo isn't a pedophile. It is extremely derailing and literally has no need to even be said. Its a waste of time and caused the rest of the thread to fill up with a discussion that was pointless since it started.

And yes. Several anons think its funny to take instagram posts out of context and derail with tinfoils about it until another anon comes in with actual context.

No. 7306

>>7305
the only one bitching here is you. no one's even been discussing it anymore.

No. 7308

>>7305
>Moo isn't a pedophile

Right, cause she's a girl? Anons had a lot of valid points tbh. Defending a sexual harasser who has a vague interest in media with sexualized children in it isn't a good look, anon.

No. 7309

>>7306
This. The conversation is dead now and has been for hours.

No. 7310

>>7275
Man-hate anons wonder why everyone considers their threads a tar pit and then post stuff like this. Your entire argument is that this place is not 8 or 4chan. What is that supposed to prove?

No. 7311

Since I've forgotten what I actually came here for, did some catching up and I really want to bump

>>7176

because it would be great if we could actually get an answer. That locking of the thread was extremely unusual, and staff seem to be refusing to discuss it. What the fuck? (thank you to the anon I am pointing to for raising it again)

No. 7312

Can someone clean up the the Miranda thread? It's been full of obvious white knights for days now. They keep defending her and claiming it's just "differing opinions" when it's clearly not.

No. 7313

>>7280
This. I’m cool with the man-hate threads. It’s something that a lot of anons on an all female board are interested in and I have nothing against its exsistance, but….
Myself and several other anons were once discussing (iirc unpopular opinions or vent thread) how we’ve had horrible life experiences with other females (personal life experiences) and one anon mentioned that maybe a thread could be created in /g/ or /ot/ to discuss issues with female friends, female bullies, female abusers, mom problems (since we have one for relationships with dad’s, but not moms) etc. Not in a “woman-hate thread” type of way but a venting, advice, and discussion thread type of way.

Immediately a couple of farmers tried to shut it down, spam that the anons who wanted to discuss it must be secret male posters/incels and that all convo regarding females bad experiences with other females should be shut down. They were being overly hostile over it just being mentioned.

It’s when it leaks into other threads and when anons who frequent man-hate feel they need to aggressively rip apart their fellow farmers just for having a different opinion or having the same experiences they discuss constantly, but with the opposite gender, that there seems to be a problem.

One farmer in the thread just agreed that it was good idea and that they wanted to discuss/vent about being bullied by other girls in high school. Quickly, they got a bunch of responses telling them to “gtfo incel”/“male confirmed”/“you cant post here!!1” when they were clearly a female. I later saw that same anon posting a screencap of it on c.c., saying that it really upset them and had offput them from posting in /g/ anymore, when they’d been a longtime farmer.

>inb4 “that anon can go b’aww on c.c. hugbox more”


It’s not cool to do that to other female farmers in a thread that has nothing to do with man hate. You can have polite discussions about one, without it negating the other. That’s why most farmers see that thread as a containment thread. It’s not the topic; it’s the pushy, rude, mini modding, harassing other users, running farmers off in other threads that’s annoying, js.

No. 7314

>>7313
This. My main issues with the users in that thread are situations like these (that many will claim never happen). I think there is way too much shit slinging and push for this site to be 100% radfem and 100% anti-man, and some of us don't really care about discussing that kind of thing.

No. 7316

>>7313
I would have to agree the infighting on /ot/ and /g/ is a bit out of hand. From the dog hate/love rivalry to anons calling each other handmaidens over disagreements. Thanks for the feedback on this because I was unsure if some anons felt the same way about those boards.
>>7311
We got backtracked on that, sorry. Answers should be posted by admin by the end of the week.

No. 7317

>>7284
Thanks for talking with us.

Are ban notices supposed to say what the ban was for?

No. 7318

>>7317
All anons should get a ban reason, if there is no ban reason than it may be a cycled IP, we can still undo those bans as long as appeals are submitted.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g ] [ pt / snow ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]