File: 1711867834557.jpeg (393.74 KB, 750x671, IMG_9784.jpeg)
No. 74115
Though this anon acknowledges
>>>/w/323946 it's been established in the thread for a while now that she doesn't even have to disclose ads due to HK law, it's constantly brought up and assumed, without proof, that everything she posts is an ad. If this is established, can anons stop nitpicking and posting with a comment about it? She doesn't live in the west and usually says when something is sponsored. It's just not done fast enough for the posters and instead, the assuming derails the thread every time she goes to an event or does something with her kid instead of anons focusing on milk, not about HK laws on META.
No. 74116
File: 1711897630749.jpeg (614.95 KB, 536x1324, IMG_3176.jpeg)
someone on /ot/ has been making bizarre posts in different threads about these bdsm chinese women. links lead to more creepy captioned pics if the woman in bondage. idk what's going in but it's creepy as hell
>>>/ot/194470
>>>/ot/1944576
No. 74118
File: 1711901356973.png (47.38 KB, 799x145, emoji.png)
so why is this emoji ok?
No. 74121
>>74118mods don't have a magical emoji detector. rule-breaking doesn't get detected if it isn't reported.
just because a post flew under the radar doesn't mean shit is suddenly allowed. use your brain
No. 74126
>>74119It won't help because the person is a ban evader. I think they had a similar spergout a few weeks ago, in the Brit thread (?) larping as a model and going on about older women. I think they even came here to complain about being made fun of.
Actually, I think it's just pakichan detailing again. She also has some hyperfixation with "farmers calling themselves Stacy" and the dig at fujos she just couldn't resist.
No. 74132
>>74115The post that brought up the comment is about her story with literal PR mail and then her and Levi going to see the cartoon that happened to send her goods. It
is an ad and it
is not a good look for her. She's not breaking rules but she's literally lying to her followers, which is what anons have a problem with. It's not an assumption or a nitpick in this case.
Plus, guess what, if you keep posting sponsored things and not disclose them as such or repost it much later in a separate post with special promotional hashtags and still not be transparent about it being sponsored, people are naturally gonna assume that many other of your posts are also non-disclosed ads.
She can't have her cake and eat it, too. Well, technically she is doing just that, but then anons have the right to point it out.
No. 74133
File: 1711913805184.png (132.57 KB, 2218x433, muh baiting.png)
Why do mods keep bending to the newfags and how the fuck is this baiting?
you are destroying board culture because some retards get upset when cartoon men that will never read any mean posts get insulted. If you want the board to become yet another shithole that babies moids like Reddit then get rid of the manhating/
TERF banners, because this is clearly not the lolcow those banners were made for.
Don't they have a husbando thread hugbox already? why the fuck can't nonnies insult cartoon men anymore. Do you not understand how insane it is to ban anons for shitting on anime men that don't exist? what the fuck is going on with the moderation. You can't even say it's derrailing because even they admit it's a very real phenomenon in fandom, they just don't want anons to talk about it because they are newfag vermin.
This is lolcow, a site built around shitting on women for being too fat or being too skinny or taking a photo with a bad angle. But shitting on men that aren't real? no man, that's too far! we must draw the line at cartoon ugly men.
>>74130Yeah, it gets derailed by anons with ugly husbandos that get upset over ugly cartoon men getting insulted. You have your husbando hugbox already, go the fuck there if you want nothing but praise over your cartoons. Women have to deal with insane fucking beauty standars both irl and in fiction and we can't even vent about it anymore? The entire internet already bends to your whims. Go to twitter and you will find tons of women praising the ugliest motherfucking moids, hell, even in lolcow we have countless threads to praise and lust after ugly men. You are so entitled.
It's so easy to just ignore a woman who's venting over ugly men getting pushed in anime as attractive, but you decide to be a faggot over it. Because again, the whole internet must pamper men, women don't deserve a single space for themselves, how dare we shit on men that aren't even real!.
>>74131Exactly, it's so fucking wild we cant make fun of ugly husbandos because autists get offended over it. Ugly men in cartoons are literally fucking everywhere, no one is taking their ugly retards away. Women just want more alternatives and for ugly men to stop getting shilled as attractive. Men don't have these problems because most female characters are attractive, women can't even ask for equality without retards getting pissed over it.
No. 74139
>>74134>>74136Is it that hard to allow women to have one single space where they can be themselves and shit on ugly men?
>>74138You know admins can tell when someone is samefagging, right?
No. 74144
>>74121i did report it, literally everything else i’ve reported since then was either redtexted or deleted
>>74120i’d assume if mods don’t want emojis to be posted ever they’d redtext them all especially because anons have been banned for literally copy pasting cows verbatim. guess it’s ok to use this emoji then to any emojifags as long as you write a wall of text to go with it!
No. 74146
>>74142So, we have to turn this place into a hugbox and never say anything bad about male characters because it might offend you? have you tried growing a spine and touch grass instead of getting offended over ugly fictional men. I genuinely don't get it, not only do you have several threads to sperg about ugly men, but ugly men are already accepted as the default everywhere. Are women not allowed to complain about the double standars in anime anymore because it
triggers you?
No. 74151
File: 1711916008076.webp (84.76 KB, 773x1000, 71AoFh82ajL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL…)
>>74146No. I am not saying you can't say anything negative about another anon's tastes. I am explaining to you why a anon would get annoyed and defend herself when you shit on her tastes. Is that a bad thing? You somehow missed my point that hard and didn't even answer the question.
No. 74157
>>74154She's mentally challenged you'll never get through to her. Meds is the only solution.
>>74152Take your meds
No. 74167
>>74164it was never an issue back when astarion was shilled as hot despite being senile. But the newfags are overly sensitive.
>>74165so, we cannot discuss things partaking fandom because you don't like? even
>>74130 anons admit it is a real issue in fandom
>there is a fandom phenomenon of praising uggo fictional and uggo real life moids happeningso, why cannot we discuss it? why cant you just turn off your pc and walk away when anons are talking about things that
trigger you?
No. 74168
>>74166I'm not the nonnas you were talking to.
Just, you've been complaining about this in like, 4 different threads now? It seems like you're taking it incredibly personally.
No. 74172
>>74164This is precisely the point to the reason
>>74133 was banned.
>>74165This is the preferred action. You are completely welcome to shit on which ever husbando you wish in your own thread but using a fandom drama thread for it is not it. Please make a thread for this in /ot/ if you feel it has enough content and enough people want it. No one cares about the discussion itself happening or not, it's just that it's happening in non related threads and derailing with a lot of infighting.
Not to mention there are still a few dumbass shit anons going around to various threads purposely derailing with offtopic comments and baiting infighting, worsening discussions. Please report them accordingly.
No. 74173
>>74169Regardless of whether it's one or two, it really seems like this has hit you really personally.
Maybe take a walk or something.
No. 74177
File: 1711918467691.png (79.25 KB, 1013x393, what’s wrong with you lol.png)
I saw this and I’m just confused. Are we actually deterred from discussing dumbass shit now, even though it’s already been shut down? Or is one farmhand just in a bad mood?
No. 74180
>>74172>There are still a few dumbass shit anons going around to various threads purposely derailing with offtopic comments and baiting infighting, worsening discussionsI feel so vindicated right now. I knew it was those dumbass shit anons shitting things up with their retardation. Everyone called me a schizo for it but I knew. Thank you wonderful & benevolent Farmhands for taking a stand against the agents of disorder and battling against them in your redtext ways. Don't despair because we will be getting through this together as a community.
>>74177Shut the fuck up dumbass shit sperg nobody, and I mean NOBODY, cares. Go be autistic about an important thing like dementia research or building wells for the poor, use your mental retardation for good instead of being annoying.
No. 74181
>>74173>>74175The reason that person was banned was because they are baiting infighting and derailing comments in an unrelated thread. If you make a thread with that specific content in mind, and people disagree within that thread, it's fine. But if they infight about it, then they themselves will get banned. Please report those people if they infight in the thread you make and we'll be on it.
>>741771. That is in the unpopular opinions thread
2. And the comment that the person was responding to was not even an opinion. It was a literal 'dumbass shit' comment. It was unrelated to the thread and as I've mentioned before, dumbass shit anons are going around posting unrelated and off topic comments in various threads. Hence why they got the redtext 'not an opinion/dumbass shit anon'.
3. You can talk about dumbass shit in the dumbass shit thread (because it's still there, it's not 'shut down', but just autosaged) or complain about it or whatever in meta. But not randomly for no reason in an unrelated thread.
No. 74182
>>74180Second AYRT, why do you feel the need to be mean omg? I was just asking a question.
>>74181But you do understand that autosaging dumbass shit did effectively shut it down, right? And it was just a question. Instead of banning her you could’ve just responded with a comment. Not sure how that was at all deserving of a ban.
No. 74186
>>74183This attitude is why dumbass shit thread was hated so much and why none of us have any sympathy that your thread got autosaged. It's just proof that you don't integrate and used that thread for being annoying and baiting for reactions.
>>74182>You understand that autosaging dumbass shit did effectively shut it down!This is the same line that dumbass shit spergs have been screaming since it got autosaged. Nobody cares. If you want to post in that thread just go post in that thread.
No. 74188
>>74126KEK i thought the model thing was sarcasm.
>>74126nta, but they need to go to the husbando thread in /g/
No. 74192
>>74187>Retardation riotsNo because it's the same group of maybe 10 anons that just act annoying in other threads and get reported because it's not that big of a deal. It's just the same small group of retards going around pretending to be a bunch of different people to drum up "support" for their stupid thread (like itt right now) that hasn't even been deleted or locked. If they love the thread so much they can go and post in it right now. It's not hard to search the catalog.
>>74189Exactly. I'm happy you finally understand.
>>74190Lurk more
No. 74202
File: 1711919902909.jpg (94.45 KB, 800x533, our bffs.jpg)
>>74194Thank you for your service Farmhands every night before I go to bed I pray to God and I say please Lord protect our Farmhands confound the knavish tricks of their enemies and let the Farmhands live happy long lives. I love you Farmhands.
No. 74205
File: 1711921438957.png (4.63 KB, 686x89, told ya.png)
infighting and derailing
>>>/ot/1945322 No. 74215
>>74213It was, thats why I taggdd both. They really think no one can tell lol
>>74214Exactly, they want engagement bc its the same spergs otherwise
No. 74222
can you do something about this retard?
>>>/ot/1945461there is no point to white kighting fictional men, it's just infigthing and derailing
No. 74223
>>74214>engagementThis isn't Twitter. Of course anons want threads they like to be active.
>>74191Are we really acting like the dumbass shit thread was a hub for infighters now? Before the bigger antifujo infight, there weren't even any complaints about the thread for half a year.
No. 74225
File: 1711930658036.gif (768.39 KB, 498x371, AMERICAN.gif)
>>74194Based Burger farmhands confirmed.
No. 74227
>>74224Farmhands are the ones that told me to make a thread
>>74172 and even though the OP clarifies not to defend scrotes, retards still try to jump in and WK fictional men because they just cannot help themselves not to
No. 74231
File: 1711935333179.png (69.82 KB, 2776x180, Capture d’écran 2024-04-01 à…)
can this kind of retarded thirstposting be banned from the husbando hate thread pls
No. 74255
>>74253>>74254Both your countries are shit but mine is worse
t.ausfag
No. 74257
>>74248Under absolutely no circumstances would we willingly comply with a request from law enforcement regarding a legitimate user, especially over matters of free speech. Our server is located in a country where we cannot be forced to comply with such a request unless it was about a user committing a serious crime (e.g. posting details of a murder here).
In the interests of transparency, I will say that we submit details about every CSAM post to the NCMEC and FBI CyberTiplines and we have spoken directly to an FBI agent regarding a certain prolific CSAM poster (don't want to summon it by speaking it's name).
No. 74258
File: 1711980184481.jpg (614.73 KB, 1080x1475, 1000005869.jpg)
I forgot it was April 1st and I was sp upsetty
No. 74268
File: 1711993428023.png (1.26 MB, 2638x938, Screen Shot 2024-04-01 at 1.43…)
this is genius can you keep these up?
No. 74270
can you do something about the white knights derailing the ugly man psyop thread?
>>>/ot/1946202>>>/ot/1946206>>>/ot/1946195they have countless threads to talk about how they love wrinkly dick and saggy balls cant we get one single thread that doesn't white knight ugly men?
No. 74271
>>74270Obviously no the poster, but there are some women who do like
ugly men. Not just sexually, but they find them cute or handsome still. I don't think the thread should allow arguing over another anon's opinion though like in the vent threads. It just ruins the point of the thread. It's who anons personally think are ugly. Arguing over it is pointless. Everyone has different tastes.
No. 74275
>>74271there's a gazilion thread where anons can gush over their husbandos. you can survive one with negative talk, just hide it or something.
it's not allowed to go in the husbando love theeass to say "ur husbando is ugly". by the same logic it's very annoying to have whiteknights come in the critical thread to defend their pixel moid. it's not even a dedicated hate thread, ppl are trying to discuss a specific media phenomenon.
No. 74286
File: 1711997296387.jpeg (331.39 KB, 750x472, IMG_9815.jpeg)
>>74285you got to it before me fuck kek. you fucking suck nonna
No. 74290
File: 1711999407821.jpeg (196.18 KB, 674x452, IMG_1118.jpeg)
/pol/-tier racebait about da joos causing ww1 and ww2 in the tinfoil thread. I feel like some anons don’t understand you can discuss conspiracies and even criticize zionism and corrupt jewish figures without regurgitating blatant neo-nazi talking points
No. 74298
>>74295I haven’t posted in that thread during the current discussion about da joos because while there are some anons who are actually contributing in reasonable ways, there’s also one or two lost /pol/tards like picrel above and I don’t want to catch a ban for responding to bait
I’ve noticed a group of anons on here that constantly complain about how “no one can talk about da joos!!1! we’re being silenced1!!” while posting takes like “jews set up ww1 and ww2 and antisemitism doesn’t exist” (without any sort of justification or evidence for their claims) when this is exactly what the nazis were saying order to scapegoat the jews for their loss during ww1 and spread jewish hate in order to facilitate the eradication of jews from europe. if you can’t discuss jews without sounding like a nazi or a /pol/tard, you don’t belong here. like it’s clear some of you just hate jews, but please refer to global rule #7 and cry about it
No. 74303
>>74299>>74295i have the thread hidden. i'm replying to you because you're the one coming here to whinge about how the obvious antisemitic racebait in the screencap totally isn't bait.
just bc it's in the schizo thread doesn't make it any less racebait.
No. 74309
File: 1712012019161.jpeg (367.89 KB, 1242x2688, IMG_3740.jpeg)
Thanks for removing my ban, but in general I would appreciate if you could hire some non-autistic jannies.
No. 74356
File: 1712181521763.png (673.09 KB, 596x634, Screenshot 2024-04-03 at 2.57.…)
I truly don't understand why the dumbass shit thread was autosaged. It was fun and if you didn't like it you didn't have to look at it. But man I missed joking around with nonas on there, it was a nice little weird outlet for stupid shit.
No. 74364
>>74362>A lot of nonas liked that threadApparently not because nobody wants to scroll the catalog to find it and post in it. It's not locked or deleted. If you like the thread you can go post in the thread.
>>74356>I miss joking around with nonas on thereSo go to the thread right now and joke around with nonas there right now. It's not locked or deleted. You can go there right now, in this very moment. Just scroll on the catalog and click on the thread and make your posts.
>>74361>Shut up and make a shitpost discord if you're upsetNooo because that defeats the whole purpose nona, then they'd have to be surrounded with dumbass shit spergs when really what they're complaining about is that their dumbass shit posts don't get read or interacted with by normal anons. They're whining about the loss of attention, not the loss of the thread.
No. 74373
File: 1712193799011.gif (16.36 KB, 220x220, IMG_9856.gif)
>lc is dead
>>lc is dead
>>>lc is dead
>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>>>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>>>>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>>>>>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lc is dead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lc is dead
No. 74383
File: 1712201466947.jpg (344.82 KB, 1080x1575, Screenshot_20240403_232801_Ope…)
I'm not a newfag. I've been posting here for 5 years. Your mods are shitheads and need to stop harassing posters. ffs, a mod didnt recognize My Immortal copypasta. Thank you for proving my point by banning me.
No. 74391
>>74387you were there too? I wish I saved it. Hilarious knowing the people micromanaging posters dont know it
>>74388i'm not wrong
No. 74396
>>74395who fucking cares what people call shit? Lose your obsession with policing others. I've seen the mods over and over again go after users for posting content and not seem to understand their own sites rules. It's embarassing
This place could be so much better if not for the obsession with control. You are exemplifying it
No. 74397
File: 1712204493586.jpg (368.84 KB, 1080x1859, Screenshot_20240404_002002_Ope…)
inept farmhands
No. 74425
>>74424???
Not everyone who dislikes the moderation here is a “dumbass poster” who apparently lives under your bed. This is complaints people are going to complain. If you think everything is perfect you can make a janny praise thread which wouldn’t need to be autosaged because nobody would ever use it.
No. 74435
>>74431Life of a dumbass shit thread sperg:
>Spew shit in different threads in revenge for autosaging dumbass shit>Target a specific thread to shit up>Come to /meta/ to complain about that thread after shitting it up>Samefag to say "x thread is wayyy worse than dumbas shit thread see!!" and use your shit spew as an example of why x thread is bad>RepeatJust what I've noticed
No. 74449
File: 1712209891855.png (663.23 KB, 2790x1010, Screenshot_2024-02-07_at_11.22…)
>>74378Ayrt, this is the first time I’ve posted in the complaints thread so at least we know it’s not just me
>>74386It’s so silly, I saw new farmhands asking whether they should ban people for using acronyms like “irl” and “ntm” and debating whether it’s twitterspeak. Like come on. The walking on eggshells is insane now
No. 74455
>>74383I think it's because you made this an entirely new thread that got you branded as a newfag.
>>74377I don't believe so. There were a lot of anons having discussions about how lolcow and the culture has changed a lot, and how there are a lot of newfags now so I guess for admins that lead to choosing to autosage the thread.
I said this in the hellweek thread but tbh I don't think autosaging the thread changed anything in /ot/. In fact, it may have made everything worse and they still have yet to rectify any of the issues with other threads.
No. 74482
File: 1712257659676.png (104.62 KB, 530x675, Screenshot 2024-04-04 8.06.47 …)
when are you going to be sorting the MtF thread? It has looked like this for the last 4 days.
No. 74484
>>74481>You really think anons are going to want to participate in a discord knowing someone is watching their posts, looking at their chat history, and that they will just end up being posted in a cow thread?This is quite true, and it's what happened to hex, but she's a very extreme example and she pissed a LOT of farmers off and cow tipped a catalogue of cows, including Pixyteri IRL by attending a con to meet her.
People should just try to maintain their anonymity.
>>74483It's unreadable and half the posts are missing. I can't make heads or tails of it.
No. 74486
File: 1712257994893.jpeg (275.1 KB, 1242x517, IMG_2488.jpeg)
>>74484You just need to tap hide or show saged posts… It looks like you have saged posts hidden…. kek
No. 74487
File: 1712258017437.png (115.23 KB, 530x675, Screenshot 2024-04-04 8.13.11 …)
>>74485Stop gaslighting me there is objectively something up with the MtF thread it's totally broken.
No. 74491
>>74487Please tell me you're joking
Kek what kind of newfaggotery is that ?
No. 74506
>>74505In all fairness what is redtexting even supposed to accomplish, it's not like you can't post the word.
nonnie sus goated fr
abusive trigger valid nonny terf femcel No. 74518
>>74515Admin please, please show her posts. I have a really strong feeling she has a fuckton of vendettas against other farmers.
It would be so fucking funny. Please.
No. 74522
>>74518Seconding this.
A post reveal would be milky and will make people use /snow/ more, which the staff said they want.
No. 74527
>>74523If you didn't want to read the whole thread she's basically this cantankerous farmer-turned-cow who has victimized, vendetta-posted or otherwise pissed off every last user on this site with her antics because she has this preposterous Regina George fantasy.
She moderated a lolcord and saved a ton of crap from farmers she befriended who shared anything personal and posted them all over the farm. In that very discord, she shit-talks the other farmers at length and insists she is a 10/10 anorexic stacy despite being just average looking and a healthy weight.
No. 74531
File: 1712350990778.png (120.78 KB, 995x566, image[1].png)
This isn't my post but can we get clarification on how this is cowtipping/selfposting? As far as I'm aware cowtipping/selfposting requires the anon to acknowledge it's them, not that a mod assumes it is.
No. 74532
>>74529I hope it happens! Adding my vote for a reveal. I hope anyone else with Hex stuff from that discord posts it too.
>>74510>>74515Bullshit, admin just said no random IP address reveals like the cat poster. Which was petty and retarded to reveal. Why are you lying?
No. 74538
>>73911Just replying to this post to say that I agree that it sound be either completely banned or not banned at all. Like a day or two ago some anon posted that they didn't understand why so many articles were posted about her boobs and started a discussion about it. I responded to an anon saying something pretty neutral or positive depending on how you look at it. Everyone who was even slightly negative to Sydney ended up getting banned, but guess who didn't (me)?
>>>/ot/1948939I don't personally care about Sydney and that post is the one time I've talked about her and I understand farmhands wanting to stop the derailing over her. However considering it's a thread for celeb gossip I also think it's unfair that if you say something even a tad negative, you get hit with a ban and a claim that you're sperging. If that's how jannies will operate, ban her completely as a topic
No. 74548
>>74543Nah, I think in that case it was justified because of how fast the thread was moving- you sound like you're mad they didn't choose your threadpic.
>>74547I hope it's just a coincidence and they don't start spamming shit.
No. 74558
File: 1712448721428.jpg (102.12 KB, 716x434, IMG_20240407_031102.jpg)
Indian scrote on the loose
No. 74570
>>74569oh yeah thank you lol I meant to reply to
>>74546 It's too late to edit now.
No. 74574
File: 1712487621605.png (12.84 KB, 510x275, wtfmods.png)
Mods need to learn what context is. anon was clearly not "hi cow"ing, they were obviously replying that it the screenshot was from Jill's twitter and not Steven's. Would love to see some actual responses to why some mods are being this anal lately? It's gotten ridiculous
No. 74581
File: 1712511679526.jpeg (1.2 MB, 1284x2370, IMG_4318.jpeg)
Why the hell did my confession IN THE CONFESSION THREAD get deleted? You retards thought I was a moid just because I dont have the same taste as what you think a woman “should”? I would understand if I randomly wrote it in an irrelevant thread or if I was trying to bait someone but fuck, this is just ridiculous. Meanwhile you let moids harass nonas here for hours before farmhands finally get off their asses to delete or ban stuff 6 hours later
No. 74582
>>74581I guess only minor “hehe i peed outside once” confessions are allowed? I dont even think confessing to being a shotafag is worse than some of the straight up awful shit nonas have said on lc before and at least it was in the right thread
The fuck is this dictatorship based on farmhands feelings
No. 74603
please move the sexism and videogames thread
>>>/m/368628 from /m/ to /2x/. most of the posts in it can all be attributed to one hysterical loon screeching about how every game ever made is softcore porn, samefagging, infighting with and antagonizing everyone in it, including anyone who attempts to move the subject away from the current infight. it's a shitshow. while a joke at the expense of moids or troons every now and then is ok, politics should be kept out of /m/ for the most part, especially political autism of this nature.
No. 74611
>>74604>>74605haven't been derailing anything, assuming everyone who calls you an obnoxious retard is the same person is no better than a samefagging accusation. keep your obsessive gamergate politics sperging off of /m/. /ot/ and /2x/ can rot for all I care, I quit using /ot/ years ago specifically because your brand of autism ruined it and /2x/ failed miserably as containment. move the thread to one of them where it belongs.
>>74606you're just being obtuse if you can't see the difference. for one, infighting isn't a problem in any of the threads you mentioned.
No. 74613
File: 1712592528314.jpeg (152.48 KB, 1242x426, IMG_3785.jpeg)
Dear jannies, not every post that’s asking a question is bait. Thanks.
No. 74615
>>74613It's very obvious when you're posting because you act like a child in regards to the questions you ask and then act like a
victim when you're penalized for obvious bait.
No. 74619
>>74618Then it's the ones derailing who are causing it. The problem is that they keep ban evading, using new IPs. That's why some instances like
>>74586 only show a very small post history. We know it's the samefags. Let them waste their day shitposting. Farmhands aren't going to waste their time banning every single post.
No. 74621
>>74619they're not derailing anymore than the spergs are is the thing. it's a thinly veiled gamergate thread, a controversial, POLITICAL topic no one can see eye to eye on and almost everyone has a very strong opinion about and that naturally invites endless infighting. if someone disagrees with you or tells you to calm down, that doesn't mean they're derailing the thread, it's still on topic. it's just the nature of the thread. the solution is autosage the thread to kill it, lock it, or move it to another board because it doesn't belong on an otherwise normal media board.
>Farmhands aren't going to waste their time banning every single postthey only ban who they disagree with it appears. I don't actually give a shit who gets banned. bans are a meme now more than ever since farmhands have admitted to adopting a freeform jazz moderation style, ensuring that absolutely no one will ever take them seriously again until they inevitably nuke the team and start from scratch once more, and they're still pitifully easy to evade. point is, the thread shouldn't exist on /m/ in the first place. it's bad for /m/'s board culture.
No. 74624
>>74621>freeform jazz moderation style I love you so much, anon.
One of the main things that kept the farm together was a sense of identity. We all knew what we were here for and it wasn't all the shit we could get on the rest of the internet. It was a niche and it was good.
Now it's just eh, whatever, might change it up later idk and this is how it works out. Be glad /m/ managed to avoid it this long.
No. 74632
File: 1712620086518.jpg (61.01 KB, 1170x958, 1659691360089.jpg)
>>74621It takes like 2 seconds to hide a thread you don't like.
No. 74633
>>74625you can just do that in the bad character design thread. keeping a thread about sexism on /m/ is like if we had a troon thread but specifically about gamer troons and housed it on /m/, or if we kept threads like celebricows and youtuber gen on /m/ because they're somewhat related to media. political autism just doesn't belong on that board, and that's all that's been going on in there lately. it's not what the board is for. we have an
entire board dedicated to radfem politics, mind you.
>>74624everyday we inch closer to being /pol/ for underage radfemtwt users and tradtards. the soapboxing is out of control. the new mods unironically might be the most retarded bunch yet, the old ones were lazy heifers but if they knew banning the fuck out of kpop the way they did was the move they would've nuked this shit on sight.
No. 74634
>>74633there is a woke media cringe thread too, retarded newfaggot
>>>/m/186892go back to /v/ if talking about sexism in videogames hurts your feefees so much
No. 74637
>>74596Please, I’m so sick of that one anon that goes on and on about how girls who got groomed aren’t actually
victims because they’re ‘bitches’.
No. 74640
>>74634are you retarded? that thread isn't about shilling your political beliefs and fighting with those who disagree with them, it's there for the express purpose of
making fun of people who try to do just that in media. I've been here since 2016, years before /m/ even existed, these kind of subjects have always been avoided on it and if you honestly think cringe threads and making fun of troon comics is in any way comparable, you're only revealing your own newfaggotry. go make your 30th radblr account, or go to our radfem political board
>>>/2x/ that you refuse to use for some reason.
No. 74644
people here complain about how stupid politicization of apolitical topics such as fandom spaces and the idea that not entertaining it must mean your a cryptonazi bigot is only to go on to do the exact same thing with their own politics in one of the only spaces where you don't have any incentive to do that. unreal.
>>74643why do you think the kpop threads were banned even though we all knew we could just hide them? because the retardation seeps out. this has happened to many different threads on many different boards over the years and it's proven to be the only effective solution to the problem after months of ban-daid fixes every single time.
No. 74645
File: 1712623556095.jpg (14.43 KB, 275x262, lol.jpg)
>>74644are you really comparing kpoopies to women talking about sexism? why do you even come to a female only imageboard, go back to 4chan, shoo
No. 74646
additionally, it doesn't change the fact that the thread doesn't belong on /m/. if an anon makes a thread on the wrong board, you don't tell anons who ask for it to be moved to just hide it. move the thread, I don't understand why the idea of moving a thread about politics to a board about politics inspires unbridled rage in these anons. it doesn't belong on a board about media any more than celebricows does.
>>74645the twitter reaction pictures aren't helping your case
No. 74654
>>74646>>74650Like other anons have said, there are
multiple other ““political”” threads in /m/ by your standards, and it’s very strange to me that you think discussing sexism in the gaming industry and gamergate is actual radical feminism kek. Regardless, whine all you like. It’s not up to you to decide, and I’m not sure if farmhands will sympathize with your plight after you called them retards multiple times
>>74621 >>74633 for seemingly no reason. You’re quite intelligent, I can tell!
No. 74658
>>74651because it was dead until recently.
>>74653that's why I'm asking for it to be moved here in /meta/
>>74654>I’m not sure if farmhands will sympathize with your plight after you called them retards multiple timeswhat else should I call them? speds?
No. 74667
>>74665or the how to write a good female character thread too.
that anon probably mad they couldn't derail the thread into shutting down and just got red texted by mods kek
No. 74672
>>74665those fit fine on /m/, they revolve more around the characters and shows themselves than personal political beliefs, and the anons using them are exhausted by troons shoving their political beliefs in media where it doesn't belong the exact same way you and the other anons in support of the thread are right now. they're not comparable. not wanting something in a place where it doesn't belong doesn't mean I think it shouldn't exist or I fundamentally disagree with it.
>>74667you're comparing a thread that is not about politics to a thread that revolves around it.
I don't want to fight with angry spergs all night trying to make me out to be someone they fought with earlier or a neckbeard from /v/ just because I think a thread would fit better on another board. if you're concerned about activity, move it to /ot/ instead then. it's already full of political sperging too and it would be more active over there than it is on /m/.
No. 74679
File: 1712635196394.jpeg (184.55 KB, 1170x950, IMG_1804.jpeg)
No. 74688
>>74685they always jump in to derail everything like clockwork without repercussion. fujo anons can't resist because everything feeds their
victim complex, the absolute retards
No. 74704
>>74703Again, you realize people can read the thread right? It was
>>>/ot/1956671 "Imagine about caring about men being abused" and then
>>>/ot/1956679 "fujos aren't owning/abusing men" kek. Are you esl?
No. 74705
>>74704NTA but the first post you link doesn't imply fujos are doing the abusing, it was in response to
>>>/ot/1956602 which was about men abusing each other.
No. 74712
Obvious derailment
>>>/ot/1956779 . Is this the same retard who threatened to smear ot with shit last thread
>>>/meta/74183 ? Autists really have been thinking they have power lately. Ot was on the brain, sorry.
No. 74739
>>74735I saw some on pt's thread and it was deleted within a minute so props to admin for that.
>>74736Kek, what's the lore on Blaine and how did he get found out? Quelle surprise a troon is also a pedo, most of them are.
No. 74748
File: 1712682595229.jpg (233.46 KB, 1080x751, 1000005921.jpg)
Kek the obsessive Belle/Venus/Jvlog edit-chan is back, we already know they lurk /w/ still. Obvious baits on /w/ might want to be reported lol This bitch is insane and won't stop.
No. 74749
>>74747Where did that nona samefag? So what, as
>>74746 said, Tom is fine being a pervert and helping other guys be perverts too
No. 74750
File: 1712685515950.jpg (287.46 KB, 1080x957, Kek.jpg)
Kek
No. 74753
>>74746Moid-fender is back in town, that's why.
>>74750She does look like a cow. Too bad mods didn't appreciate the humor. I find it hilarious.
No. 74755
>>74753even if they did it's still a nitpick
>>74754what to
No. 74772
incel whining on /g/, idk why anons still reply to moids
>>74769>>74770could all be the same guy?
No. 74785
>>74767Does anyone actually think the people in that thread were actually lesbians to begin with though? I thought the thread was for women who
thought they were lesbians but turned out not to be? That is an unique experience. A thread for women who thought they were straight but turned out not to be should be allowed too, right?
No. 74786
File: 1712753098370.jpeg (59.52 KB, 522x213, IMG_9921.jpeg)
Oh gosh how dare anon use the word “kek” on an imageboard and add extra ks to it, so unheard of. The janny who redtexted this was probably huffing her crackpipe and it accidentally fell on top of the ban button
No. 74791
File: 1712756164347.png (173.8 KB, 2716x386, Screenshot 2024-04-10 at 09.33…)
this nona is right and she should say it more. some of the changes to etiquette over the last year have been so nonsensical it's like a psyop. thank you for keeping the site going but please, mods, you are wasting your time with some of this shit and creating an unnecessarily awkward environment.
No. 74800
File: 1712763032491.png (340.21 KB, 1305x600, Screenshot 2024-04-10 4.29.42 …)
Can shit 'threads' like this just get deleted rather than locked? It's just a scroteposting who is getting off on the idea of women reading his weird fanfic larp.
No. 74802
>>74793Preserving the culture of the site is actually one of the only things staff does correctly though. Idk why you want this website to be like all the other sites on the Internet.
One thing that has been irritating me for a while is that, nowadays newfags have enough gall to infight and sperg out when told to integrate to this site. That's why this site has changed so much and sometimes doesn't even feel like lolcow anymore, because they try to bully the staff and users into bending to them rather than integrate to the site they chose to post on. Pretty soon you will have anons demanding that transphobia be a bannable offense.
No. 74817
File: 1712778468875.jpg (880.15 KB, 1080x1888, Samepostnokid.jpg)
If farmhands need proof that there are posters deliberately posting children, here it is. Anon capped it with the kid on purpose when it was completely unnecessary. I understand that if the cow posts their child the kid can be posted to a thread, but this is deliberately posting a child for no other reason than to do it. Just seems strange to do when its not even milky. I've seen anons make points that this happens on /snow/ too.
>>>/w/324679 At least the user got banned.
No. 74820
>>74815I'd say it invites medfagging, but yeah, the ban is a reach.
>>74817Anon was banned for a different thing. Ree on. It's a non issue.
No. 74824
File: 1712781173114.jpeg (307.31 KB, 828x704, IMG_2326.jpeg)
Strong contender for funniest redtext I've ever read
No. 74829
>>74820>it invites medfaggingThe fuck? It's not?
>>74817Are not satisfied with the nitpick ban, wk-chan? You had to bring your favourite "won't someone think of the child!!!" argument? Chill, it's a non issue. Go tell Taylor to stop shoving the kid into the camera for cuteness points in an ad if it bothers you that much.
No. 74836
>>74831>personalityfagsbreaking the rules per definition. Anyone who thinks they're just too interesting and quirky to stick to the rules is probably causing a ton more infighting and bullshit all over other threads too. I can't wait until the day we get all the post histories of these chronically oversharing constant breakdown havers. Is anyone interested in making threads for the personalityfags we know of? The Hex thread was pretty fun until the milk stopped flowing. I know there's at least one other personalityfag
Japanonshitting up that thread and /meta/ at the same time all the time and she sounds good too.
No. 74849
/pt/ mod is not caught up on Venus milk from /w/ and is banning anons who post facts
>>>/pt/931208. Anons having to spoonfeed the mod on old milk is pretty sad
>>>/pt/931228. Mod needs to go catch up on the /w/ threads or just move this thread back to /w/
No. 74861
>>74794If you like
nonnie stay on tumblr and if you like kek stay on WoW. Only organic imageboard lingo like OVER 9000 and lolcat speech allowed.
No. 74864
>>74861Including
nonnie in this as a gotcha is stupid because it and it's variations literally are a relatively new term (to lolcow). Actual oldfags remember when anons just said anon and when the switch happened. There are literally anons who are opposed to using
nonnie/nonna because it's indicative of newer users.
Actually, including kek in this is dumb too. Kek is old as balls, it predates this websites existence and it's always been used here. The whole problem with twitter slang is that it shows your a newfag who is choosing not to integrate to our culture. I feel like some of you are purposefully being dense or something.
No. 74865
>>74864No I think in trying to bait she was making a legit point. You've seen those baiting spammers who add keeeeek kekekekkeke kek to every single sentence/post, it's as much of a newfag tell as saying
nonnie.
No. 74871
>>74867This is true, I’m not sure why anons are acting too retarded to see it
>>74868Who is arguing against following the rules and integrating? It’s simply inevitable that board culture will change over time. LC is hardly the same place where moids were posting openly, moderation were no where to be seen, personalityfags ran wild, and I’m GLAD
No. 74875
>>74874just read this.
>>>/meta/74482most of these self proclaimed oldfags may live on this site 24/7 but that doesn't mean they understand how to use it.
No. 74881
>>74873I don't necessarily think these should warrant an auto ban but they stick out when i see them:
>sus>delulu>ijbol>iykyk>vibe check>it's giving..>not the…Just off the top of my head. Imo language will probably shift as
>>74867 said, even though zoomerspeak stands out now and is annoying
No. 74882
>>74881Exactly. They stick out
now and I get finding them annoying to some extent, but throwing tantrums over them and demanding that anyone who ever uses them is banned is annoying, hypocritical and actually a waste of time. Like it or not, at least some of these words will catch on and they will no longer stick out. And new terms will be coined and those will stick out until they catch on too etc. Aggressively policing "imageboard culture" is a pointless sisyphean task.
No. 74883
File: 1712867489284.jpg (47.09 KB, 539x768, a19dfef5ef28a9d89e13fc73ba2c9c…)
At the end of the day, I hope farmhands don't start getting soft on integration bans (whether that be certain slang, posting styles, personalityfagging and whatever else) even if transplants, newfags and twitterfags try to manhandle the site into changing. We probably need integration moderating more right now than ever tbh. Adapt to the culture of the site you're on or gtfo.
No. 74886
>>74884Look me in the eyes and tell me farmhands aren’t more nitpicky and
trigger-happy with bans than ever before. I agree that integration should be enforced, but some bans are simply schizophrenic. There has to be a reasonable middle ground
No. 74888
>>74883Again, can we have a list posted of the forbidden words on the rule page then? If there are no objective guidelines for the bans, they are just vibe checks based on the opinion of the farmhand handling the report (and let’s face it, their track record with understanding sarcasm for example is not great due to their autism). Who decides what is ”acceptable og lc culture”? At what point do words become non-bannable, like happened with
nonny/nonna/etc?
No. 74907
>>74906>a regular user adding useless inputs about how the site should be moderated and acting like a mod even though they’re just a regular user.where did the posts you linked here
>>74894 do that? literally all they did was restate the rules because the other posters didn't get why it's bannable
No. 74912
>>74906oh no, why would anyone post inputs about how they think the site should work in the "complaints & suggestions" thread of the meta board?
>>74908there's an uptick in newfags aggresively refusing to integrate and insisting the rules shouldn't apply to them. even when you try to explain the rules they just get offended
No. 74922
>>74921Sounded like it.
If she had written it like fujoshi = female fandom instead it would have made sense.
No. 74943
File: 1712971295483.png (181.29 KB, 1853x464, incel-seething.png)
>incels unironically thinking that PearlyThings actually believes in the shit opinions she shares
Fucking KEK this is why we need the tradthots thread back
No. 74951
File: 1713012414774.png (46.22 KB, 581x270, IMG_20240413_063715.png)
No fun allowed in my gossip website
No. 74957
>>74956I find it so funny that you actually think the latest posts are a single anon replying lol. No one is minimodding the thread by suggesting in a suggestion thread that farmhands reevaluate the thread like they did so many other threads on /w/ when it's clear the thread isn't used for milk at all and has devolved into constant nitpicking. Maybe learn lolcow terms like 'minimodding' because you aren't even using them right.
Also welcome to lolcow culture, calling out retards who post retarded things. Especially ones about how a cow holds a glass.
No. 74960
File: 1713021389028.jpeg (229.01 KB, 686x906, IMG_9981.jpeg)
was vpn hopping and found this kek, farmhand didn’t even bother permabanning let’s just make this a scrote haven and ban all of the female users en masse. they banned dumbass shit thread because most of the posters would talk shit about trannies and scrotes and contributed to more troonphobia and troon consciousness. most of the jannies eat dicks for breakfast, ugh
No. 74961
>>74959Lmao stop pretending you're not here every two weeks crying about closing the thread.
simple suggestion my ass
No. 74962
File: 1713021708796.png (221.63 KB, 1837x836, more than one anon.png)
Genuine question, these users aren't the same that are highlighted, so is
>>>/w/324879 technically also infighting along with ban evading? Anons have always made it clear in threads when posts are terrible, but when did that become whiteknighting? Also the thread sucks, I agree with not allowing a new one to be made until actual milk flows.
>>74961The post never said anything about closing the thread. Maybe re-read the post. You're jumping to conclusions. Putting it in a box with the other /w/ thread that farmhands have said need proof of milk before a new thread could be made isn't even a new notion for the site.
>>74960>farmhand didn’t even bother permabanningBut you got the ban from 2022 though. They escalate ban lengths instead of permabanning sometimes. This has always been a practice even before the 2020s.
No. 74966
>>74954>>74963Taylor fangirls are so fucking annoying, good lord. Including the mod herself who bans literally every post there for "nitpicking" yet other threads like Terry's goes completely unmoderated and is filled with stupid nitpicking like "here he is sticking his tongue out again ewwww!"
Anyway farmhands have already said legacy cow threads will never be closed or stopped, when Kota fangirls requested the same of her thread.
No. 74968
>>74963it's bait, fuck off. I see it was redtexted as bait as well. As it should be.
Thread would be slower if WKs and fangirls stopped replying to shit they don't like. The glass thing is retarded. Solution: do not reply. Problem solved.
No. 74969
>>74966I love their dedication and the audacity to yell 'newfags' and 'board culture' to make it seem like a legit cause lol The thread
is overly moderated. Discussing an influencer's dumb reels is not nitpicking. Calling blatant ads deceitful is not nitpicking, even if it's technically legal in her country of residence etc. But as anons mentioned above, wks and retards responding to bait like the latest post fills up the thread much more than the shit posts themselves.
No. 74970
>>74969but the posters go on about
muh gossip site. there are no good or bad posters. anons just need to follow posting rules and looking at the thread, even once in a while visitors to it have noticed how vendetta-like the posts have been.
No. 74972
The Taylor R thread in question only has two bans for whiteknighting but tons for nitpicking (28). This doesn't include finding variations of nitpicking like "pointless nitpicking"
>>>/w/310457 and
>>>/w/302581 "baby nitpicking". The thread isn't full of whiteknights and most of the infighting redtexts are to anons going out of their way to call any posts being indifferent or saying it's not important as whiteknighting or fangirling. Some posters are delusional and don't know how to cope that their cow isn't as milky as she used to be.
No. 74975
>>74973looks like anon might've lagged and it duplicated it by accident
>>74974lol the point is that the wking boogeyman isn't out to get you and that these posters are the ones ruining a perfectly good and slow thread
No. 74977
File: 1713031721570.jpg (195.82 KB, 1080x812, Screenshot_20240413_125010_Chr…)
Why is this anon red texted when the person who asked for recs and then got mad and started the infight when they didn't like the answer didn't? Also they reposted a question asked previously in the same thread just to argue. From the anime thread.
No. 74983
>>74982its been popular for some libbies to convert, like Lindsay Lohan for example
>>74981ok then i'll rephrase, white and western muslims are just as bad as muslims from an actual muslim culture. Really, muslims borne from a legitimate muslim culture are worse and we all know that.
No. 74993
>>74991came here to double this cause holy shit its so annoying seeing the first page just be 8 yr old threads. i wish they tried to type differently or botnet with a few people to make it look authentic
>>74992elaborate
No. 74998
>>74980"any actual woman"
what the hell has happened to this place, seriously. We used to just worry about the milk. If moids made themselves known, kick them and move on, no big deal.
Now the banners about past milk are being replaced with "laughing at boys" because we're twelve year olds now or it's this paranoid schizophrenia that a m*le might look at the site and then womanhood is over or something.
Why the fuck are we obsessed with moids and trannies now? Where's the fucking milk?
No. 75009
>>75000Please, if you're an oldfag, learn what wking actually is. Pointing out nitpicking because anons are retards is not the same as defending a cow, its making fun of the anon making the OPs. Your head is screwed on wrong.
Tinfoiling mods are fangirls is so childish when all the redtexts have been rule breaking thus having to treat the users like children. You might as well sperg about them being trannies too, who hate women and are trying to take down the thread by self posting. Literally a stone throw away and all for a milkless cow.
No. 75034
Some retard is spamming the bee movie script in the Lilee Jean thread
>>75033we know some fujos are tifs and vice versa. it's not that no one wants to hear it, it's that we're tired of it being brought up all the fucking time.
No. 75043
File: 1713113880147.jpeg (566.33 KB, 1170x1074, IMG_7762.jpeg)
I get that /snow/ had loads of necro recently but this is actually new potential milk.
No. 75051
>>75040ayrt idgaf about defending yaoi or w/e im just tired of the same infight being rehashed iver and over again in multiple threads. get a hobby
>>75046yeah but it should be a containment thread
No. 75058
File: 1713131064572.jpg (398.54 KB, 720x1600, Screenshot_20240414_232849_Gal…)
Pinkpill thread immediately got locked a minute after it got made with a reply from the farmhand telling anon to go use the pinkpill thread in the hidden board which no one uses.
Meanwhile there are is already a ton of gender ideology hate, gender critical and troon threads on the hidden board yet farmhand is not locking threads here telling anons to go and and post in the hidden boards.
It's strange,i remember a couple of weeks ago anons were discussing pinkpill threads and one anon said it was weird how the GC threads are now on OT yet pinkpill still isn't here and those anons told her surely if a thread is made it wil be allowed. Well this proves that pinkpill threads still are NOT allowed despite the fact that they peaked many anons on moids. Actual feminist discussion is not allowed, you are only allowed to talk about troons.
No. 75063
>>75061NTA but I think that anon did understand, and I remember that reasoning being discussed too. Newfags don’t know about the hidden board because it’s hidden, so they were derailing the /snow/ threads with that type of discussion. Now there’s a link to the /ot/ gender ideology hate thread in the /snow/ threads and farmhands direct them to /ot/ when they get banned for derailing. There’s not the same
need for a pinkpill thread on /ot/
No. 75078
>>75072>>It's telling anons to fuck off to the proper threads and stay on topic.How when the pinkpill/manhate threads are hidden?
>>75076>because it attracted retards that refused to keep it contained in it's own thread.Lol meanwhile ot is filled with retards who derail every thread about troons but gawd forbid you see manhate. Also there is already some manhate derailing in snow threads so it would be better to have pinkpill containment. Also throughout your post you purposely leave out the detail that the infighting "newfags" were butthurt moids who wanted to derail the threads. The same thing used to happen to the troon threads yet they are allowed, its very telling that you are only allowed to shit on troons but not on moids. The radfem to tradthot pipeline is real.
No. 75083
File: 1713170045827.png (289.01 KB, 632x515, Screenshot_20240415-003115.png)
I accidentally reported this because I was scrolling and not paying attention to the thread (it's the "post like a mois" thread) please disregard lmao. Sorry mods.
No. 75092
>>75088Again, they should just work on a way to make bans less easily avoidable. Hellweek and banning in general won't do shit. Just look at the usual target Unpopular Opinions right now. An anon got banned yesterday for sperging out about some literal who tradfag tiktoker
>>>/ot/1963089 and after less than 24 hours, they're at it again in the very same thread.
No. 75095
>>75093>anti-fujos are the only derailersClassic fujo
victim mentality. I wonder who it is that keeps biting their bait for hours on end? Definitely not my fellow fujoshi sisters! We could never do any wrong!
No. 75107
File: 1713197655523.png (202.73 KB, 1080x973, retards.png)
Not the anon pictured but are farmhands actually retarded? Look at the number the other posts are replying to, the anon who got banned hit the backspace key by accident and replied to the wrong post. They don't pay any attention to what they're banning, no wonder so many anons are ignoring the rules even in the sea of redtext that is redditcow lately when this is what caliber of stupidity the mods are on.
No. 75111
>>75108Kek are you the mod who banned her or what? It doesn't look like that, you can deduce what reallt happened just by looking at her own post number, no excuse, both you and the mod whose dick you're sucking are just retards. There was no reason to ban her for that in the first place but she was banned within minutes for a typo, before the post deletion window expired during which she could have corrected it. The absolute state.
>The mods don't have to read upthread for contextYes, they do? I mean, they don't do it, obviously, because they're lazy but they're supposed to.
>>75110Again, banned before the post deletion window expired and there's no reason to ban someone over a typo. I cannot believe you're so dedicated to whiteknighting the mods you're trying to spin this on that anon.
No. 75114
File: 1713205421918.png (42.92 KB, 505x343, screen.png)
Same thread as
>>75107 and I'm neither anons, what's the rule against shitpost? I'm surprised this dead thread suddenly got a lot of reports kek. compared to this one, I had reported more offtopic posts that got denied.
No. 75122
Why did you guys lock the Rev thread?
He actually seems cow-like. And no I'm not OP but this guy is always starting drama and being obnoxious on social media
>>>/snow/1985718 No. 75127
>>75124Weakest bait possible
>>75126So yeah, it was an anon just being retarded.
No. 75138
>>75134This anon
>>75126 and yes, it is. I do agree the femboy poster was more of the issue, especially how she shat up the artist's salt thread prior but trying to work out the mod's thought proccess is beyond comprehension.
No. 75140
>>75135>>75138i agree the femboy retard realky needs to be dealt with, she uses the art critique thread as a palce to dump her low-effort trap coomshit and then gets mad when she gets actual crit.
thewhile point of the rate my art thread is to get feedback.
in general, anyone who snaps back " well lets see how well YOU draw" everytime someone critiques them is missing the point if the thread and they ought to get banned for infighting.
No. 75157
Please permaban the 4chan crabfag
>>>/m/371288 They keep ban evading and complaining about crit they receive. Claims anons rating/criting can't draw and baiting. Already got caught defending herself. Honestly, still not 100% sold its a woman. Calling farmhands "admins" too is very telling that they are a newfag.
No. 75161
>>75157calm down schizophrenic. I am not the only one shitting on your crabbing, you are very obnoxious. If the best thing you can say is ''lol shitty anatomy'' then people are going to make fun of you and ask you to post work. No one called other anons crabs because they actually provided either a redline or a thoughtful critique, you are just being an obnoxious shitter and acting like a
victim when anons make fun of you. You are actually acting like a lot of art cows we had in the past.
No. 75163
>>75161Not going to defend
>>75157 but it does reek of ass pat begging if femboy anon keeps posting art without any visible improvements or not having actively applied the critiques kek. Just bad form in most art communities but not necessarily rule breaking.
No. 75171
>>75170Definitely a newfag
>>75168It's a rate thread kek anons can say
your anatomy sucks and that's on topic.
No. 75173
>>75169She has improved very slightly, just as one does in the span of a few months. You can't expect her to turn into leyendecker in a year.
>>75171anon already knows her anatomy is shit, how is shitting the thread with low iq ape posts good for the thread? either ignore her if you think she's a retard who will never improve, or provide a deeper critique. I think you are just jealous because femboyfag anon got a lot of fanart from other anons who aren't shitty crabs.
No. 75177
File: 1713287541874.jpeg (474.73 KB, 573x1442, IMG_3445.jpeg)
>>75168it's an art rate thread no kne is obligated to be nice. "your anatomy sux" is still feedback.
>>75173the odd offhand this is bad" comment won't shit up the thread half as much as people sperging and infighting about crabs and farmhands because they're oversensitive.
>>75170i said /ot/ because the same kind of retards were previously shitting up the art salt thread, picrel
No. 75178
File: 1713288012816.png (134.76 KB, 627x609, 7867786786786.png)
I'm
>>75163 but I'm gonna agree that "your art sux" is not good feedback. However at this point femboy anon has had enough good criticisms that's why everyone else is shitting on her. Ultimately still in topic of the thread. I'd ignore it and focus on studying and not posting if it were me kek.
>>75167She has posted a few times before in art salt where people also gave her crits, and then people asked her to move to art post thread. Her and another anon from the /cgsg/ drama are from /ic/ and it reflects their little integration, the other anon calling women foids for example. Checking thread of picrel, she did say she wanted to get in /cgsg/ so she might not be the other /ic/ anon.
No. 75179
>>75178Posts like
>>>/m/188508 is not good feedback either. The thread isn't made specifically to cater to feedback. If an anon says they do or don't like something someone made, that's still contributing to the thread. I don't know why this poser is causing so much hassle complaining that someone said they hated their art outright instead of prancing around it and walking on glass like some anons have been because they are trying to be nice. The pic you posted still does not use a model or any kind of reference. The user has not improved and anons cannot keep giving the same feedback over and over just because /ic/fag wants to cherry-pick who can comment on their posts. They just want to share their femboy art which is fine, but throwing a tantrum at feedback or crit they don't like or even the offhand "I don't like it" is what is shitting up the thread. Anon can ignore those anons and not reply. She can't take people not giving her doting praise.
No wonder she posts on /ic/. Moids love femboys and I bet they asspat her day and night to see coomer material. Maybe she should stay over on /ic/. Demanding anons post their own work if they plan to give crit that /ic/fag doesn't like is asinine too. She's a pick-me artist who caters to moids and comes to lolcow where the majority is female and she can't handle actual people trying to help improve her art. Stunting herself from improving.
No. 75184
File: 1713289938742.jpeg (245.29 KB, 1284x701, IMG_4341.jpeg)
>unintegrated tiktokfag gets no ban
>random post gets banned for “bait”
Accurate display of the average moderation on lc nowadays
No. 75187
>>75179Can you quote the “tantrum” that anon threw? It seems a bit ironic to claim that when you are actually throwing a tantrum in this very thread
>>75157.
No. 75188
>>75185Agreed
Also 6 hour bans for infighting is beyond retarded, especially the short one-off posts, should be 3 hours at most
No. 75189
File: 1713292253238.jpeg (373.43 KB, 1365x2048, 1713271646069.jpeg)
>>75184>random postanon, it was a retarded twitterfag accusing someone of being a pedo for posting this. that ban was earned.
No. 75190
>>75169>posting art in a thread meant for posting art in is bad you can’t be serious
>>75189i’m sure it’s just the art style but that does look a little shota
No. 75191
>>75189Where did she call the anon a pedo? She just said it was creepy and not to post stuff like it again. All that requires is someone ITT telling her the truth, not a ban
Also you’re conveniently ignoring the unintegrated newfag not getting a ban
No. 75193
>>75185it didn't until very recently and look at how the site has only gotten worse and more irate under the new baby Hitler mods. /ot/, /g/, and /m/ have never, ever been so covered in redtext the way they are right now. former teams specifically avoided heavy moderation on those boards. their last hellweek did jackshit so why would they think treating every day like hellweek, even on boards that have been exempt from hellweek in the past, would go over well let alone help anything? it's completely arbitrary. in an environment where you get banned for breathing, it makes anons care less about the rules. it's a win for people who like to report the anons they're infighting with and no one else.
>>75188agreed. if you're a mobilefag, try turning your mobile data off and back on.
No. 75207
File: 1713296412693.jpeg (110.75 KB, 640x491, IMG_1542.jpeg)
>>75185yes it does. it takes two to infight. by replying you're giving the baiter what they want and dragging the infight. there's a reason "don't feed the troll" is one of the oldest rules of the internet.
>>75197bc we're not here to indulge retards. that anon was selfposting in the third person (
she's probably still doing it if this thread is any indication) and shitting up threads with her defensive sperging. she deserved a ban not handholding.
No. 75228
File: 1713310370248.png (26.9 KB, 275x222, IMG_1893.png)
Say it with me nonnas
Dumbass shit dumbass shit dumbass shit dumbass shit dumbass shit dumbass shit
No. 75243
>>75237ok pakipoo
>>75235no one from fujochan is raiding you faggots, it in its entirety is barely as active as the average cc board. antifujos have a containment thread, use it.
No. 75251
>>75249Its so obvious when they screenshot certain posts that they’re just venting shit they’re too scared to say to their twitterfag friends
Mods should nuke the thread forever
No. 75253
>>75246Clearly works as a containment thread considering I’ve been happily using /m/ for years without running into you retards spamming for hours. Keep it up though, just move your worthless /ot/ posts over there too. Oh and take your newfag fujochan friends with you too who clearly dont know how to integrate
>>75252Exactly this, obnoxious little kids who refuse to integrate and think lc is their tiktok comment section. Back then fujos here were trained well in keeping their sperging to a minimum outside the containment
No. 75258
>>75254Yeah the kshit retards werent on this level but I’m glad farmhands dealt with them regardless
Now if only they would do something similar about the newfag fujos
No. 75259
>>75255because /ot/ is the asshole of lolcow, keep that shit far away from /m/.
>>75254>Kshit was banned for less at this point you must not have been around during the time before kpop was banned if you can say that with a straight face. kpop wasn't just banned due to infighting, it was banned because of the daily race wars the most active kpop thread was home to because a good half of the posters in it obsessively hated koreans, something that's actually against the rules for a better reason than "wah, I don't like it." picture celebricows with 70% racists and 30% twitter users spamming fancams of 6/10 men with bowlcuts doing shitty two-steps. you just have a vendetta against fujos. the shotacon is all one person and it might be rancefag if that one farmhand redtext is to be believed.
>>75253you know why /m/ never gets spammed? because it's not one of the cesspool boards, that's just the culture of /ot/ in action.
No. 75265
>>75262do you think unpopular opinion threads and every other thread that runs on infighting is all an inside job by cryptofujos? you're trying to get something banned because you don't like it, not because it has a reason to be banned.
>>75263>Not when most of the threads that are shit are media relatedcope of the year kek. /ot/ hasn't been fine since 2017, newfag.
No. 75271
>>75265When people have no other option than to assume that everyone is a newfag to win an argument, kek. Seethe more
nonny. /ot/ was better without the constant spam of media threads.
No. 75277
File: 1713336214847.jpg (185.37 KB, 720x1456, 103848492181833.jpg)
Farmhand needs to get their eyes checked because objective reality isn't "tinfoil"
No. 75278
>>75255It's cause /m/ is the image dump board and nobody wants to fucking use it to discuss anything when AI generated mutations keep being spammed at bindling speeds burying any thread where you need to write a complete sentence including comma.
Moving all the fandom shit to /m/ would be pointless as it would only go back to /ot/ under a different package. If you move fandom discourse there the fandom discourse is going back to artist general. That's where it was after fandom psychology was locked.
The solution is obviously to create a dedicated image dump board. Then all the media shit, including artist general, can go on /m/ and stay there. The state as it is is not user friendly and thus will not be used.
No. 75283
>>75259Kpop broke it's containment far less often. As someone who is neutral on both kpop and yaoi I was involuntarily exposed to kpop far less. Now anytime yaoi is mentioned in any thread it results in a huge infight because both fujos and anti-fujos can not contain themselves.
>you just have a vendetta against fujosThis paranoid delusion is part of the problem. I pointed out that kpop was less disruptive and that yaoi has always been present on LC. I never called for it to be banned, yet apparently I now have a vendetta against fujos when I don't care either way.
No. 75285
File: 1713352633451.png (26.59 KB, 636x578, -.png)
Kek, thank you farmhand.
No. 75298
File: 1713358642882.png (445.14 KB, 860x1240, elsie.png)
wtd did my post
>>>/m/371288 get accussed of being the femboyfag? did you guys just quoted anyone you dislike. I don't even use a VPN i just have a dynamic IP and use incognito because i don't want this shitty site that gets raided by cp almost daily on my history. Here is an old wip of elsie i never finished to prove i am not the femboyfag.
No. 75299
>>75298Same, kek. I go as far as spoofing my user agent and posting under a VPN, and my posts were accused of being her. See
>>75287. I'm going to leave it alone after this however as I don't really care, it's just kekky to see the mod team scramble to hide their mistakes like this.
No. 75303
>>75302if there was one mistakingly quoted anon it wouldn't surprise me if there are more. Considering you quoted me despite having no real proof, as i explained in
>>75301 i do actually want you to be transparent and explain how you found out that anon was ban evading, because after the first bans the goat femboy anon continued to post without her posts being banned for ''ban evasion''.
No. 75308
>>75305>Posting specific proof would mean making it easier for her any anyone else reading to ban evade,?
There are already entire cow history exposé pages exposing how staff tracks post histories.
No. 75313
>>75307I agree that /ot/ would probably benefit from a Euro hours farmhand. The lack of moderation at certain times is noticeable.
>>75308Finding the links and info would require newfags to lurk and they would need a minimum competence to understand how to use that information. Let's not spoon feed the retards.
>>75312Dynamic IP. You live in the same area as someone that keeps getting banned.
No. 75328
>>75326They can still address shit like moving media threads off /ot/, they arent some hapless lambs with zero authority. Even 1 reply saying something has been noted/passed onto admins is better than radio silence.
Also farmhands have previously discussed the dumbass shit thread problem in these threads, it isnt only cerbmin.
No. 75330
>>75329Huh, funny how you conveniently ignored me saying that even just communicating briefly, even as an affirmative negative, is better than nothing.
>uncertain movesThey have every authority to move threads to the correct boards. Why would they be jannys if they have to ask mommy admin for something as basic as that.
No. 75341
>>75336And the /ot/ gender ideology hate thread should be moved to /2X/, the /ot/ TMI thread should be moved to /g/, celebricows should be moved to /snow/. Right. For anons that don’t really understand how imageboards work, there’s always going to be some overlap between board content. However, each board has unique anons and culture, which has been cultivated
by the board it’s on. It doesn’t make sense to move around long-established threads when they obviously best suit a particular board’s culture
No. 75361
>>75341we honestly don't have enough users for board culture to be a meaningful phrase here.
>>75355yes. the bans here are given out so freely yet are laughably easy to evade… another of God's little tests.
No. 75384
>>75379It was two different anons quoted here
>>75376 so no, probably not
No. 75387
>>75376been here since 2016, worked my way from janny up to mod at one point believe it or not!
>>75378if it was all the same people, the post quality would reflect that. it's not. there are a ton of /ot/ onlies.
No. 75394
File: 1713373841970.jpeg (264.31 KB, 828x810, IMG_1942.jpeg)
>>75378While I think most /m/ anons use /ot/, whether frequently or infrequently, plenty /ot/ anons rarely if ever use /m/. I’ve seen /ot/ anons admit to this in the random questions surveys, and the fact that /m/ is so much slower than /ot/ makes it obvious
>there's like 5k people here totalFWIW, these hellweek stats aren’t even accurate anymore. Unique posters were at an all time low during hellweek. Just look at picrel for current site traffic estimates
No. 75404
>>75367at least /m/ is chill and less prone to infighting. yeah ut's slow but people have actual discussions e. g. the movie or book threads.
sure /ot/ moves fast but it's full of bait and infights now. traffic isn't everything
No. 75416
>>75412admins said recently they pay 100% of the server bill themselves and they took down the donation link, maybe they just aren't financially motivated
or maybe after this comment they will put up adverts kek. when reddit posted their stats they said 90% of people who browse (not bot traffic) either don't have an account or have never posted. I know lolcow doesn't have the same demographics but if there were 5000 unique devices then there should only be 100,000 unique visitors
No. 75427
>>75422i wasn't the one who replied to your joke and im not actung thr
victim, i was genuinely asking.
there's plenty of autists online, i just don't get why some anons are so fixated on foojos in particular
No. 75428
File: 1713377217684.png (208.24 KB, 1080x871, lol.png)
meanwhile in modland:
like is it a psyop? how have the bans gotten this retarded?
No. 75430
>>75429>post is on /m/>in a pokemon thread>in a discussion only 2 people care aboutdid you expect the anon to make a macro of pokemon sex ratios for her one off /m/ post? this is yet another prime example of newfag farmhands, bankrupt in common sense, not understanding that rules that were created to solve problems on the
cow boards don't need to/were never meant to be enforced on the other boards
No. 75434
File: 1713378737079.jpg (50.08 KB, 406x406, 1713371172931.jpg)
Thank you admins and farmhands for allowing the fujo vs. anti-fujo discourse thread to stay up.
In three hours there have been less than 20 posts in the fandom thread and almost 200 in this one, with some actual well-thought out posts and discussions in there if you can believe it or not. I know it's a containment thread but there are nonas who want to and will discuss this, as cancerous as the topic might be.
No. 75437
>>75428>>75429it's a sensible rule for cow threads but it doesn't always make sense in offtopic threads where you might just be directing an anon to a resource.
this particular link leads to a massively long wiki list and a screencap would have brought nothing
>>75434agreed but i think there shikld be a farmhand notice tgat it's a containment thread.
and ideall mods should be making sure that pro or antifujo derails outside the thread get redirected to it. but then again there arent enough farmhands to moderate /ot/
No. 75444
>>75440There's absolutely no need for it, bootlicker-chan. No one cares besides the anon that person was replying to, it would be more annoying if she did post a picture of a fucking mile long wiki page. The rule about posting pictures only exists because of cows' habits of deleting their shit off social media.
>>75442>>75443>this retard is awakeSigh
No. 75450
File: 1713383811595.jpg (377.42 KB, 1080x1261, Screenshot_20240417_144700_Chr…)
How was this ban evading? I literally didn't get a ban message, and even posted in a different thread in between posts. I didn't even realize I was banned lmao. I was using the same browser and didn't change my vpn or anything? I also don't understand how I was derailing in the first place when I was trying to bring up discussion to compare Jills professianal fashion designer execution of a concept from another brand. It was even saaged.
No. 75452
>>75448I never understood the "malicious link" reasoning because a moid could drop a malicious link and upload a screenshot from another site to entice clicks anyway.
If an anon is just linking to an archive site or wiki - and that's obvious from the URL - I don't see the point of a preview screenshot at all. I've stopped myself from posting things from archive sites because of getting burned a couple times in the past. Sometimes there's literally nothing to screenshot, or in the case of foreign language sites, nonnas would want to use auto-translate to read it. idk it is retarded to have to screenshot nothing and post it just to have the privilege of linking to wikipedia or a web archive site. Just my opinion, don't flip out over it.
No. 75455
>>75454all but one of the anons who claimed they were not that
nonnie was that
nonnie No. 75456
>>75455i’m talking about these
>>75298 >>75299. i guess there were only two, but i could’ve sworn there was one more
No. 75459
>>75454The thing is didn't even change anything, I was on the same tab as my original banned post
which wasnt even derailing imo. I shouldn't get banned for ban evading when I didn't even get properly banned the first time kek.
No. 75464
>>75459just keep ban evading. maybe lay low for a few months wrt the subject you got banned for. like ultimately mods can't keep anyone from posting, just refresh your router lmao
t. gets "permabanned" at least once a month for pissing off farmhands/tattletales
No. 75483
>>75478because half the userbase is twitterfags and they know they'll get clocked immediately if they use their lois griffin reaction pictures. but also
>>75482, one time I got banned for avatarfagging because I used two reaction pictures of the same character over the course of 6 hours.
No. 75487
File: 1713433563815.png (90.93 KB, 680x331, 1000024294.png)
>>>/w/325102Not my post. What about this is "nitpicking"? Anon isn't allowed to comment about a hotel? The cow didn't pay for it so it's not even a negative comment for her, she's smart not to have paid for that.
No. 75509
File: 1713454221665.gif (18.34 KB, 279x62, IMG_0034.gif)
i’m literally hoping and manifesting this entire website gets a complete moderation and admin overhaul this year or the next. i can’t take the retarded nitpicking bans anymore. manifesting a new and fun lolcow without ridiculous helicopter modding and abuse of the report button from anons
No. 75510
File: 1713454421319.jpeg (246.92 KB, 828x1307, IMG_3477.jpeg)
why was this thread locked? there's a lot of hyperspecific threads in /m/ but this inz gets nuked?
sure the topic is niche but it made sense to have it apart from the main fujo thread bc most history fujos din't discuss anime or manga, it's a separate "fandom" so to speak
No. 75513
>>75508>your postnone of the posts are mine, try again.
There's nothing even "shitting on the cow" it's a fucking hotel she didn't pay for. And good for her for not paying for it. The problem with the post isn't "nitpicking," because nothing is being nitpicked. Take the L and go look up a definition.
No. 75515
>>75512That's not what anon said. /ic/ anon was mad that people were giving advice they didn't want. Instead of ignoring it, they started spamming "crabby" at other anons and then started shitposting crab memes. One of these users is retarded and it's not the one who gave advice. Anon didn't like people saying their work was bad in a rate my work thread. They are a child, clearly.
>>75514Is this just another attempt to try to build contempt for fujoposters? Personally I don't think we need an adjacent thread, even if the reasoning is "well /m/ actually has niche topics". You can discuss all sorts of genres of yaoi in the thread we have already. It's not
that fast.
No. 75524
>>75515>is this another attempt at building contempt for fujopostersjfc not everything is a conspiracy. i just wanted to ask farmhands something about a moderating decision since this is what this /meta/ thread is supposed to be for.
i wasn't even the op of the locked thread, historical shipping is just something i'm into.
>>75516theee's a billion specific threads about specific husbandos and moids youre attracted and whatever but mention the word fujo and you people get a conniption fit. it's not that serious
>>75521>>75523a general historyfag thread is a good idea but consiering how
trigger-happy farmhands are, i bet if you made one now it'd be locked for attempting to recreate a banned thread or some shit.
No. 75526
File: 1713474346275.png (978.22 KB, 1600x800, IMG_3501.png)
>>75525there exists a serious history thread but it's dead as hell. the hsitoryfag thread would for/about poeple who're into specific historical figures, amke fanart or fanfic of them, ship them etc.
No. 75527
File: 1713478186110.jpeg (431.4 KB, 750x973, IMG_0052.jpeg)
I was gonna get my horny on for the week and you just had to cut the fun and spoiler a cute kissing gif. You nuns think they’re fucking under there, umm remember?? this is a Christian imageboard and we only lay on the bed like a fish and let him go at it once every Friday in the pitch dark. They’re not having sex jannies, they’re praising the lord with their and speaking in tongues by mashing their lips together, unspoiler pls
No. 75531
>>75528you’re right, it’s more sexy and hot more than anything. making me all hot and bothered and sheitttt
>>75529i hate you