File: 1705493359276.png (277.51 KB, 354x471, lets_see_who_the_REAL_admins_a…)
No. 67834
there's been so much retarded infighting because of food/weight/diet related talk in ot, see
>>67833, and it's getting extremely annoying to read the same shit over and over again. there should be a discussion about containing this stuff in the respective threads (weight loss/exercise/whatever the thread is about in g).
No. 67837
File: 1705524470156.png (1.19 MB, 1242x2688, IMG_3192.png)
You know some truth just got posted when it gets hit with the (derailing)
No. 67839
>>67837i'm not disagreeing with her at all but this should go in the pinkpill thread on 2X or something instead. this poster continually clogs the thread with her reddit spaced novels, often not even relating it to tradthot content at all but just posting it on its own. that
is derailing even if it's also based and interesting.
No. 67842
>>67840i would also advocate for a pinkpill thread in /ot/ again but
>>67841 is right. and 2X is dead for a reason, it's overtaken by cringe like the nationalism thread while most normal posters have abandoned it. be the change you want to see.
No. 67845
>>67843because /ot/ attracts newfags, baiters and trolls. it would be a shitfest. on the other hand, 2X being a hidden board has had the same result as one of those far off islands filled with ultra
toxic snakes and shit that just continue to get more
toxic due to natural selection
No. 67849
File: 1705537238195.jpg (1.59 MB, 1757x2000, 582940@2x.jpg)
It'd be cool to do something akin to 4chan's winterball, but with the board-tans we have here.
Anything from roleplaying as one board asking the other out, coming up with outfits/designs for pairs, creating fake drama to get a certain board to pick yours, drawing/writing about it etc.
Since the way threads are meant to last here, it'd probably have to be a single containment thread in one of the boards (probably /ot/), but it'd still be doable.
No. 67858
>>67850>Isn't GC anymoreThe most popular thread is literally the tranny hate one.
>>67837Free speech isn't allowed on this site. Anything that hits too close to home will be hit with a ban.
>>67843A man hate thread or anything that reminds certain types of reality would definitely attract seething from actual newfags and moid spergs on an unhidden board. Newfags are usually libfem and vapid congregating to the celebrity and moid sperg threads of /ot/
No. 67860
>>67858you can hate troons without being gender crit or indeed feminist at all. plenty of conservatives hates trannies too.
and yeah lc has no free speech rule, this isn't twitter, thank god there's some gatekeeping here
No. 67870
File: 1705615930875.jpg (246.67 KB, 1080x680, Screenshot_2024-01-18-17-07-13…)
Not this anon but is this really racebait? Seems more like mocking racists than that. Especially the whole "only seeing the world in black and white" thing. It's in the hotep thread and I feel like it got swept up in other bans on the thread maybe? Or maybe an American who can't see brown got mad and reported it kek
No. 67878
>>67856this would literally kill this entire site
>>67870I agree this isn’t race bait per se, but it is still retarded bait. americans, one of the most diverse clusters of people, only see ethnicity in black and white? kek
No. 67889
>>67886You're so right "sister", actually why don't we hide the whole website, since newfags and other undesirables are on all boards, especially /snow/ who is in the lead with the amount of redtexts it has per day?
>As was seen with /2X/ being hidden again, hiding boards reduces the amount of undesirable posters meaning that they are easier to moderate.So true, I'm glad all these pesky radfems from reddit and twitter and facebook and 4chan and kiwifarms are contained and hidden away, so that the rest of the website is very successfully free of manhate.
No. 67892
>>67889>actually why don't we hide the whole websiteI would prefer that. LC would just be a front page and then any poster would be required to manually input the board they wanted to visit in the address bar.
>So true, I'm glad all these pesky radfems from reddit and twitter and facebook and 4chan and kiwifarms are contained and hidden away, so that the rest of the website is very successfully free of manhate.Other people being too dumb to access a hidden board is not my problem.
No. 67895
I warned you I warned you lolcor you let shotafags post in
>>>/g/361134 and now it’s growing. The baiting is already happening.
No. 67897
>>67895I like how the shotafag posts are sandwiched in between anons saying their fetish is ddlg and getting raped by older
abusive men. The duality of nonnies.
No. 67913
File: 1705873071253.gif (454.4 KB, 200x200, 265499a21.gif)
thanks farmhands love you
No. 67949
I swear posters on this thread only nitpick and tinfoil about milk.
>>>/w/318260 refuses to post proof of this copying aside from "SHE WORE A BRA TOOOOOOO" This isnt even about the cow and the post had nothing to do about the cow either
>>>/w/317926. They don't seem interested in real milk vs this fake attempt to make Taylor milky by getting other anons to try to believe their bit. Shoehorning in other influencers to make a point about a
trend not even started by this random girl is utterly useless to the thread.
No. 67961
File: 1705884418702.jpeg (984.14 KB, 1167x1791, 4D3DCEEE-182E-4D8F-84BE-5BB9E1…)
Attention whoreing moid (likely a tranny) in tradthots thread. The absolute state.
No. 67964
File: 1705884876244.jpeg (174.48 KB, 1242x1100, 29337517-6D69-4EEB-8122-A6EEAA…)
Wtf is going on with the tradthots thread. I can’t work out if it’s a self loathing brown chick with gender/racial dysphoria or a mentally ill white troon with a brown woman/sniff fag fetish. I’m guessing the latter.
No. 67967
File: 1705885535839.jpeg (724.43 KB, 1123x1520, 3F21C153-0D9F-4F7B-A550-4BF025…)
>>67965Figures. Because that troon is bisexual and also has a fetish for brown and black women. He’s still going.
No. 67969
File: 1705886242909.jpeg (783.6 KB, 1242x1856, A3B9569A-F924-45CA-8F43-DB6A3E…)
Farmhands/janny clean it up please.
No. 67977
File: 1705887212960.jpeg (1.03 MB, 1165x1555, 8DDC44B6-9C5E-4D96-911C-B57FDA…)
He’s sperging about brunettes now in /g/. Guess it confirms it was a mentally ill blonde moid.
No. 67989
File: 1705891527319.png (232.69 KB, 864x866, 1000019656.png)
Don't seem to have gotten an actual ban afaik (didn't see a ban notice), so can I please have an explanation as to why telling someone to read the OP of the thread instead of asking to be spoonfed is "infighting"? This poster also repeatedly refers to a woman over 30 with 3 children as a "girl" which is frankly bizarre.
No. 67992
File: 1705894390658.jpg (352.01 KB, 1170x737, amen.jpg)
No. 68009
File: 1705901667948.png (Spoiler Image,557.01 KB, 521x921, rgeageragersg.png)
>>67964>>67965>>67967Just saw this, lmao. He's not the tranny. He's legitimately my bf, and was baiting while I laughed (my hand btw). The tradthot thread has been overrun with failed members of that community posting self-hate garbage, misogyny (while claiming to be women) and unironic racism like moids. It deserves this fate and worse. This isn't the first time we've mocked it, but the body odor racial supremacy sperging was too unhinged. Hell week is not enough.
>>67997>still obsessing over his hair colorThis shows you've learned nothing, and you are obviously one of the failed tradthots taking obvious bait. Nobody in the real world actually cares about hair color (or how blond/e is spelled) except racists and teenage girls. Jannies can ban me for this. Please do your job and clean the website while you're at it.
No. 68026
sorry mods i know you are busy but please ban the retard baiting
>>>/ot/1864307 retarded anons are actually replying instead of reporting
No. 68035
>>68032Where was anyone even saying that prostitution is based, cute or empowering?
At the end of the day, lolcow isn't really a site catered towards certain opinions or stances. If everything got banned just because of someone disagreeing with it, we wouldn't discuss anything on here.
No. 68037
>>68035In the unpopular opinions thread
>>68033Of course you’re a Depp supporter, you pathetic man worshiper. As I already said kpop, Adam driver, and nitpicking women’s looks have all been banned too, there’s no reason why pro-sex industry rhetoric shouldn’t be banned as well. The majority of anons hate prostitution and sexbuyers/sex-offenders, there’s no need to cater to the few man worshiping prostitutes with personality disorders (who are most likely troons anyways)
No. 68044
I hope third time's the charm. Either pakichan or the antifujo sperg derrailing the fandom thread with the same ''ukes are actually women'' shtick. Retarded anons already took the bait and are derrailing the thread even further.
>>>/ot/1864328This fucking retard is always trying to bait and infight every single time anyone mentions fujos. I dont know why she's convinced the fandom thread is the fujo cringe thread 2. Her posts are so obvious because they never have anything to do with fandom discourse, it's always just shitting on fujos and calling them ''pornsick''. She has an entire thread for that, but the fandom discourse is not for that.
No. 68064
File: 1705930692442.jpg (168.5 KB, 718x1435, Screenshot_20240122-183751_Sam…)
Can a farmhand fix the good character thread in m? It keeps bugging out and missing posts (both pc and mobile)
No. 68130
>>68128agreed, the worst thing was that one anon admitted to being a stripper (?) but at the end still admitted it was dangerous and not a good job, and then a few other anons said they knew girls who were great people who were strippers but not that the job itself was a good idea and IMO strippers aren't prostitudes. Literally no one supported prostitution in general nor did anyone say it was empowering or good
I hate being THAT anon but I have a feeling the anon is just a frequent infighter, especially since I have seen multiple other posts around the same time using her same spergey style that (hopefully) has been banned since. She needs to calm down and have a break
No. 68131
Can the gardening thread
>>>/g/209934 be moved to /ot/? It's not feminine health/beauty related and I'd like to see it (hopefully) get more traffic in /ot/.
No. 68145
>>68144i reported them though, even brougth the reports here
>>68026 >>68021
>>68044 No. 68149
File: 1705956079855.png (10.79 KB, 657x326, how_to_turn_off.PNG)
>>68147press the fire gif at the top of the page here
No. 68179
>>68138The anon mentioned she worked at a DV shelter but also treated trafficking
victims as freak shows who are dangerous, it's actually worrisome she works around traumatized women and views them that way. She also associated all the trafficking
victims she met with strippers which is why she kept insisting stripping and prostitution was the same thing (surely someone who works around trafficking
victims would know it's not??)
Either way I hope the women she's supposedly around don't get further traumatized by her rudeness and can find the safety and help they seek
No. 68195
File: 1705982633884.jpeg (639.47 KB, 1170x1871, IMG_4796.jpeg)
>>68132No, the first anon said that men who go to stripclubs have the “healthiest form of sex consumption” and that she would rather date a man who goes to stripclubs than one who watches porn. She said something about it being ok because it takes effort on both sides (whatever that means) and that at least he would know what female bodies look like outside of porn angles. Then there were other anons saying that every stripper they’ve ever met has been sweet and intelligent with beautiful souls, which is the opposite of how women who choose to involve themselves in the sex industry are.
>>68138No, I said that trafficking and the sex industry are inextricably linked, there’s never just one without the other. Women who choose to sell themselves to rapists and pedos who also buy trafficking
victims are just as bad as the sex buyers they’re selling themselves to
>>68179What the fuck is wrong with you?? I separated trafficking
victims and WOMEM WHO CHOOSE TO INVOLVE THEMSELVES repeatedly, you have poor reading comprehension. I said that I’ve volunteered at women’s shelters and rape shelters, so I’ve encountered strippers who are all horrible pickme types. A lot of the women trapped in DV situations had horrible upbringings with trashy stripper moms who abused them, I’ve never encountered someone with a prostitute mom or stepmom who had positive experiences with her. Every single woman I’ve ever met who dealt with a female parent like that was abused by her, it’s a stereotype for a reason. Now I’ve included a screenshot of my original post so you can see who stupid and ignorant you are, I literally separated trafficking
victims and retards who choose to sell themselves to rape apes
No. 68198
>>68195>No, the first anon said that men who go to stripclubs have the “healthiest form of sex consumption” it came off to me as that she thought it was the lesser of two evils, she still seemed to disagree with it overall
>hen there were other anons saying that every stripper they’ve ever met has been sweet and intelligent with beautiful souls, which is the opposite of how women who choose to involve themselves in the sex industry are. that's fine? only like 10% of strippers ever did any sort of sexual activities for money, ofc women who dance around in a thong on the DL aren't going to be exactly like the druggies you meet on the street
>No, I said that trafficking and the sex industry are inextricably linked, there’s never just one without the other. Women who choose to sell themselves to rapists and pedos who also buy trafficking victims are just as bad as the sex buyers they’re selling themselves tothat's fine, but the discussion was about strippers, not hookers
>Every single woman I’ve ever met who dealt with a female parent like that was abused by her, it’s a stereotype for a reason. Now I’ve included a screenshot of my original post so you can see who stupid and ignorant you are, I literally separated trafficking victims and retards who choose to sell themselves to rape apesif you work in a shelter of course your experience is going to be vastly different than other women who meet strippers as friends or as normie women with a bad past. Either way you should calm down and likely stay away from volunteering, you sound pretty gross yourself
No. 68199
>>68198>only like 10% of strippers ever did any sort of sexual activities for money, ofc women who dance around in a thong on the DL aren't going to be exactly like the druggies you meet on the street Nope, the majority of strippers have personality disorders and drug addictions, they’re exactly like there druggies you meet on the street
>that's fine, but the discussion was about strippers, not hookersRape apes who go to strip clubs have an extremely high rate of benign sex offenders and predators, and paying for sex which includes trafficking
victims.
>Either way you should calm down and likely stay away from volunteering, you sound pretty gross yourselfI really don’t though, you can’t even respond to me without changing every point I made to sound worse which means you know you’re wrong. Just shut up and stop infighting, you’re a moron who can’t read
No. 68218
>>68195Why do all radfem refuges on this site sound extremely retarded. No one gives a shit about your retarded sperging,derailing, inighting etc. All you newfag radfems know what to do is talk about trannys, prostitutes, gay men,bisexual women and women who wear makeup. That's all you braindeads talk about and you derail every single thread so you can talk about those things and write autistic-schizo paragraphs.
The tranny threads were a mistake.
No. 68225
>>68223>>68223I said men who buy women, pay for sex, go to strip clubs, watch porn are evil subhumans and that most of them buy trafficking
victims. You just proved that you didn’t even follow the conversation because I said it repeatedly.
I never said “women who are abused are the worst people alive” I said women who abuse and traffick their own children are the scummiest people alive
No. 68236
File: 1705995766157.jpeg (115.86 KB, 1163x393, IMG_4800.jpeg)
>>68229 No, I said women who abuse their children and traffick children are the scummiest women alive, I’ve met a lot of trafficking
victims at DV shelters who are trafficking
victims, like I am, and so many of them have horror stories of their pickme moms who sold themselves and their daughters to men and let their boyfriends prey on their daughters. I think what’s confusing you is that I said strippers and other prostitutes are all horrible people for involving themselves in the sex trade because it revolves around trafficking and they don’t give a fuck as long as they aren’t affected by it. They all have dark triad personality disorders and drug addictions, I don’t know why you keep insisting that they’re “cool and sweet”, they’re all pickme man worshipper scum
The last paragraph of my original post literally blames men for all of it, so I don’t know why you’re lying about what was said
No. 68237
>>68232Read
>>68236 you idiot, I called men evil subhumans for buying sex in my first post
No. 68300
I feel like mods really don't care bout the not posting people under 16 years old rule, posts like
>>>/snow/1953793 and
>>>/snow/1958408 why have the rule of its barely enforced
No. 68333
File: 1706049324492.png (143.01 KB, 502x340, 0rYng2n.png)
I really hope nonna here didn't get permabanned for this, cause xiran was posing/retweeting anti-semitic stuff, as well falling under wierd conspiracy shit.
No. 68458
some retard is trying to infight
>>>/ot/1866876its so annoying how you cant have a decent conversation anymore, even on hellweek, without anons going ''anon ur a retard ur opinion bad kys faggot retard ape wah wah'' to a small mistake, specially when they are the idiots who didnt properly read the original post.
No. 68503
File: 1706185578486.jpeg (373.69 KB, 1242x2208, 2C0C0E82-C6CB-470B-AD7A-05BF01…)
esl faggot takes "die of embarrassment" literally and reports. esl mod bans. I was able to appeal but this pretty embarrassing for the mods.
No. 68522
>>68507Seconding petition.
Maybe having to compete with active, actual /snow/ cows will get the schizos in the Venus thread to take a breather and focus on actual milky snowflakes. As things stand now /w/ is basically the Venus boards which says a lot when Venus has negative milk.
No. 68623
>>68609>>68614It's more than one anon because I can see it's not just me kek.
I don't think she fucks her dogs literally, I think she has degenerate zoophilic dogfucking fantasies. There's a difference. The former is tinfoil and the latter is on display for the whole world because she's a cow.
No. 68625
File: 1706242902756.png (206.74 KB, 2762x390, Capture d’écran 2024-01-26 à…)
i understand redtexting the people who replied to her but how come the retard who started the bdsm derail in the first place didn't get a redtext?
No. 68627
File: 1706243196780.png (198.05 KB, 1112x372, no commentary.png)
petition to bring this back for Confessions permanently even though it was a short lived rule
No. 68670
>>68667>>68666Because the scrote doesn't have proof. He's been trying to get anons to bandwagon on admin for running a
male site without proof. Even the dude he emailed told him to fuck off. He tries this every few months. Its a good thing its deleted because its false and just shits up the thread with the terrible tinfoil.
No. 68718
File: 1706316635909.png (108.78 KB, 1809x542, Untitled-2.png)
I'm calling out the mod who labelled this as "derailing". The post wasn't derailing in the slightest; anon wrote how "women are financially abused by men a lot" and then proceeded to break down HOW the troon got himself and his wife into debt. She even warned anons "This is a really good insight on how most of these freaks think and WILL take advantage of you if you're in striking range of them." Mod who called that "derailing", you're a retard.
No. 68758
File: 1706370990959.jpeg (1012.8 KB, 946x1461, 03A0BD9B-F2EB-4851-A494-3EAF8B…)
>>68752>>68753This is just another /pol/ or kiwifarms A&H website now and you retards are ok with it. Males ruin everything
No. 68766
>>68763>the tranny Oh my sweet summer child, you are so naive to think that its just
one tranny
No. 68777
File: 1706384686828.png (148.91 KB, 1122x247, RIFVFzD.png)
farmhands, this is clearly not meant as actually being racist and meant to the whole "lantix" term
No. 68785
File: 1706387832821.png (262.63 KB, 1064x1399, Screenshot_20240127-152941~2.p…)
I agree the mods are getting a bit too ban/ red text happy. The second anon was joking about finding out Tyler's height. It interesting hearing from different anons that Fresno that it's a small town and an actual band wouldn't go there to play a small dive bar. It gives insight and calls out Stormy/Pumpy for posting how "famous" her boyfriend's band is.
I said it in the thread but I will say it here, mods get the stick out of your ass
No. 68789
>>68788It didn't just get redtexted as cowtipping, it also got redtexted as blogging which it absolutely was.
>Holy fuck i live near here!>Kek I could have gone and possibly snapped pictures of the cow in the wild>Would have been kind of coolWho gives a fuck?
No. 68794
agree with
>>68792 thanks farmhands. sorry to the nonas who took the bait and caught a ban too but it's hell week after all.
feel like I remember this happening last time the tradthod thread got locked too lmao
No. 68803
>>68799No1currs, stfu about this already.
>>68800It's just a website.
No. 68809
>>68806I didn’t author either of the posts you tagged, so actually yeah you are the only person I’ve replied to thus far. Also it actually does matter quite a lot who is running the website, because this isn’t a website for troon men and faggot males. This is not 4chan. This is a women’s imageboard. If you don’t like that or feel the need to protest that women moderating a women’s imageboard is crucial to the health of the board and our culture, then I’d recommend
you leave.
No. 68815
File: 1706418461355.jpeg (194.6 KB, 1170x1113, IMG_0776.jpeg)
Some of the farmhands are genuinely fucking retarded, the link to embed was posted in the correct field where it states “YouTube/tiktok links supported” but it didn’t embed >>927720
No. 69005
A farmhand posted in the pro-ana scumbags thread
>>>/snow/1960733 and I'm taking my complaint here. Anons have a problem with
>>>/snow/1960694 being posted because it's a repost from the previous thread and anon is clearly making a point of reposting the same image which upset other users in the previous thread to once again upset them.
In most threads reposting milk, let alone nonmilk, would get a ban. (N2F has graduated and I think the posts over multiple threads is a bit much to begin with). Pro-ana scumbags has had a consistent problem with moids posting (one of them being a scrote who revealed his profile because he was lurking a support group for ED parents) including a recent ban-evading scrote claiming he was stimulating himself to pictures in the thread so users are a bit skittish, because honestly I do think it's a little creepy. I'm not scrotefoiling, because women will do things to intentionally upset other women, but there is a context here I've tried to explain.
Further, I would propose a rule-change of not posting uncensored pictures of children on lolcow because even on the moidfarms users will try to censor children of cows. Not that lolcow should become like the moidfarms (it's rife with blogposting) but they also practise documenting cows. Thank you for reading my spiel.
Please forgive me for the length, I have tried to explain myself fully so it doesn't seem that I am sperging out for no reason. Ta. No. 69030
Can a mod look into this poster? I feel like this thread is being used to cowtip Micky. Theres that vendettafag in thread that sounds just like the email micky received and posted about.
>>>/w/318723Cows all over w keep being cowtipped. Wtf is going on.
No. 69109
File: 1706650590602.png (438.09 KB, 1064x684, 56.png)
newfags making premature threads again.
might also wanna clamp down on the turbonewfag in the hellweek thread js
No. 69125
>>69120It's outdated. It used to be fairly effective.
>>69124Most people didn't notice it.
Hellweek doesn't work anymore. It hasn't worked for a long time. We should be trying to work out why and brainstorming new ideas.
No. 69140
File: 1706692301019.png (339.04 KB, 1381x603, ln5tpfY.png)
This is just pedophilia
No. 69143
>>69134i don't like men but the anon seething about homosexuality in general are creepy. and like
>>69136 said there's been an uptick in getting anons hung up on the gay part, not the male part
No. 69150
Ban the scrote in
>>>/ot/1413046He was gone, then started posting again, stop allowing him in
No. 69156
uhhhh global rule 1 broken in
>>>/ot/1868574 let’s not get shut down nonnies
No. 69161
File: 1706721807160.png (130.42 KB, 1170x630, Screenshot 2024-01-31 at 9.23.…)
This ban was a little retarded. My comment wasn’t a complaint or a comeback at all; they were literally just talking about hamas fujo art and I asked why it bothered you…i intended no harm or crudeness mod kek.
No. 69186
How many times do anons need to nitpick terms?
>>>/w/318831 Taylor is so boring and it's embarrassing to see the thread attempting milk so often. This isn't funny or milky. It's just an anon with a personal vendetta and hates that Taylor thinks having bees in a car is bad luck. Seriously, consider closing the thread of anons can't get their shit together.
No. 69220
>>69219>>69197>>69193Can you guys link?
>>69216I'm not replying to your bait anymore. Just take the bans and shut up. Anons know exactly what they are doing by posting non-milk. Go to generals for random fashion discussion.
No. 69230
>>69220I haven't been banned, haven't dared to post a thing there anytime recently. Are you moderating that thread?
>baitnone here. I want to know why expressing an opinion about some influencer's content about clothes is nitpicking.
>Anons know exactly what they are doing by posting non-milk.Yeah, they are discussing the cow's content. People comment on fashion of other cows. Lori, Jill, Dylan Mulvaney, Grimes, Katherine, etc. They aren't even fashion influencers. Taylor is. If the thread weren't ridiculously moderated, I would have said the dress outfit was a good look for her. Why can we discuss what other cows wear or their content, but not Taylor? It's not that hard to answer this.
No. 69239
File: 1706861648441.jpeg (207.05 KB, 1290x411, IMG_9211.jpeg)
My post in celebricows was relevant to the thread and saged. I don’t see how this warranted a ban.
No. 69252
File: 1706892652133.jpeg (222.07 KB, 687x717, IMG_0259.jpeg)
this shouldn’t have gotten redtexted. if you actually watch the video, there’s a TIM jumpscare
No. 69290
>>69217'tranny jannies'
seethe and cope.
>>69240The Taylor threads need to be locked again, obviously.
>>69253No, this is just what it looks like when they actually redtext everything.
>>69254I love that some retard can stop by with the most obvious bullshit and there's already at least one anon going I Want To Believe.
No. 69298
>>69290sounds like you're getting angry?
>>69290>Taylor threads need to be locked againbecause someone didn't like 2 of the outfits in a reel? I think you need to take a break.
No. 69320
File: 1706999553768.png (509 KB, 626x848, woof-2.png)
>>69319I think the Shay thread needs harsher moderation regarding offtopic derails because there is an entire board to discuss her and anything related to her.
No. 69385
>>69375This lolcow lmao. Most nonnies here are sick of coomshit that appeals to moids so course they have to call out to whatever's distasteful since it's everywhere in media and on the internet even to the point where it's normalized like lolibait and female only fanservice in anime. It's called having standards. Women who defend this shit are desensitized, pickmes and enabling moids of their degeneracy to also ridicule women for being "woke" and "tirggered" on things they find disgusting and uncomfortable when it's been done so many times. If you like that stuff then good for you I guess. Just remember not everyone is going to agree with moid pandering shit.
>women like designs that are sexual too and not every fucking design is for men.Yes on sexualized men but not in the male gaze like kawaii moeblobs labeled as boys or women in dumb bikini armor. Also who says that every design is for men?
>Anon needs to fuck off if they are just going to complain that every post that isn't a pure nun outfit [which is also heavily sexualized by males even though a nun is FULLY CLOTHED] is for male gaze only.Being against moid coomshit =/= only approves of pure things. Their's a difference between a normal nun and a sexualized nun with an "Ara~ Ara~" blushing smug face but you would say the second one is totally ok.
No. 69445
File: 1707203456963.png (9.96 KB, 443x163, CAPTURE.png)
The 120 second wait time is till on
No. 69463
>>69454that's a fair cooldown period, 2 minutes is just way too long
>>69453can it please be done on /m/
No. 69487
File: 1707241462941.jpg (422 KB, 904x2316, Screenshot_20240206_174456_Chr…)
How the fuck is this bait, I'm not saying sister as a racial thing wtf
No. 69541
File: 1707271988592.jpeg (64.27 KB, 549x251, IMG_0333.jpeg)
nta but what is wrong with this?
No. 69568
File: 1707295802765.jpg (86.37 KB, 893x1099, IMG_20240207_135135_510.jpg)
Why was this anon banned?
No. 69576
File: 1707309446982.jpg (546.21 KB, 904x2316, Screenshot_20240207_123628_Chr…)
>>69487Shit modding this week guys. You unbanned me for the first one and changed the red text to learn2integrate when I've regularly been posting since 2014. Sorry for sparking joy with another anon in the unpopular opinion thread I forgot it's the current residency thread for the male baiter.
Now I'm getting called a twitter faggot when I haven't got a twitter. I used the /s as I'm sure other anons can agree the farmers in the celebricow can miss obvious sarcasm. What else was twitter faggotry?
No. 69579
>>69578Because taylor also needs a beard to keep interest with her mid all American girl and country fans.
I'm remembering I saw a ban for someone using abbreviations as apparently its twitter coded and I would also like to state the term "IRL" predates the creation of twitter online. That phrase popped up on online forums to differentiate when the Internet and offline life were starkly different
No. 69591
File: 1707313972753.jpg (50.52 KB, 700x394, uwu.jpg)
just throwing this out to see what the consensus is, but what about a celebricow tinfoil on /ot/? if we have a /shay/ I think it's actually quite reasonable all the celebricow tinfoilers like drake-chan and plugh-kun get their say azealia banks could bless us who knows. imagine if amanda seyfried anon had her right time in the right place.
before you think too hard this is a supply and demand thing. I demand a supply of unhinged tinfoils and I think the unhinged can speak for themselves (and make the thread I'm not doing it let us study your habits)
I hope picrel suffices as an offering to the farmhands and nonas alike amen
No. 69601
File: 1707323098007.jpeg (550.95 KB, 828x1094, IMG_0340.jpeg)
farmhands… what the fuck are you on about. I posted another screencap from /tttt/ before and that was fine? this is milk because the level of cope troons demonstrate to convince themselves they’re “fembrained” is funny. why has moderation been extra retarded lately?
No. 69605
>>69601defs more retarded lately, I'm assuming they're
trigger happy after hellweek
like yo if you ban everyone but your faves you'll be in an echochamber like twitter, let us infight like real women. unless…?
No. 69608
>>69604>>69606so screencaps of funny troon posts are too “general” now? a bannable offense, even? do you
want to kill one of the only active milk threads left on this site? tranny janny accusations are starting to make a lot of sense kek
No. 69635
>>69632if you actually check the thread and the many responses that post received, nonnas found it funny and interesting too. you’re projecting what YOU find interesting and policing anons based on personal assumptions about what the thread should be like
>For all we know a woman wrote that to bait troons.for all we know, tranny janny is enforcing this retarded new rule to kill one of the most popular threads on this site because it makes fun of troons
see the issue with your logic? we’re on an anonymous board. let’s stop policing each other over retarded shit and have fun
No. 69646
>>69601the specific cow rule is retarded. there's a reason a lot of cow threads are now about communities rather than individuals, with mass internet access there are just too many cows.
the age of the individual lolcow a la chris chan is over now that any retard and their grandma can go make a fool of themselves online.
>>69640i get wanting quality control but if you don't allow discussion of the community in general and you don't allow anything that isn't about a named individual it'll just have the opposite effect. instead of actual discussion it's just gonna be nitpicking selfies. unless killing the thread is the intended effect.
No. 69650
>>69645farmhands are handing out bans for the most mundane shit. it’s genuinely frustrating and makes this site less fun. I think part of the issue is inherit to the nature of this site (farmhands generally don’t delete posts, they just hand out bans), but farmhands have gotten way too
trigger-happy recently trying mold this site to their liking. let’s remember that the current mod team did NOT create this site. why should they be making sweeping decisions without user input like deciding which threads need to be nuked and which kinds of milk are permitted?
No. 69652
>>69649That’s all fine and good, but only trannies use the word
TERF. Hence why it’s redtexted, see?Just call them feminazis or something kek
No. 69654
>>69650I agree, it seems like they have some vision of what this site should be that doesn’t match what the majority of users think it should be, and so they’re just forcing the changes and figuring anons will adapt. The flaw in this thinking is that we simply do not have the userbase anymore for this to be an effective strategy like it might have been on the past or on other websites.
They’re running the risk of pruning the tree too low and killing it in the process of trying to shape it.
No. 69659
>>69654people will never agree with me but a lot of the changes that have been happening lately have been necessary to keep the board from turning into some sort of social media-tier hellscape. i've already watched other sites i love(d) get ruined by that and it's frustrating because most of the time the mod team does nothing at all to stop it, so you're just left watching your favorite community get ruined by stupid teenagers. i am admittedly kind of sad that the shit threads got nuked, but they were sadly attracting people to the board who really had no business being here if they were not interested in integrating or respecting other users or even contributing. it was starting to become overly negative and longterm users were being run off by these people so that they could turn the boards into twittertok 2.0. plus it's weird to me to come to a site you only just discovered in a youtube comment section or while browsing tiktok, park yourself exclusively in 2-3 threads, ignore 95% of all other content on the site because it "doesn't interest you", start treating it like it's a free for all, and to top it all of, have the audacity to want to start bossing a site you've only been posting on for a year or less. i'm old but that kind of behavior would never fly anywhere on the web without some sort of pushback, let alone here.
traffic to the boards has been slowing down for years anyway so it is what it is at this point and it's never going to go back to how it used to be. all of this can be chalked up to terrible moderation, which is why the boards are in the position that they are in now. people may not like cerbmin but they're cleaning up the mess that the last few admins we had left behind so i give them grace for that. i will always, always be grateful to them for actually stopping the raids. i'd rather see this place be quiet and slow with less autism and a much more pleasant atmosphere, than fast and crazy with low-effort, low-quality posting and hormone-fueled retardation. the peak days have long since passed so we might as well just make the most of things as they are now, i guess.
No. 69679
File: 1707343232228.jpeg (701.86 KB, 725x1432, IMG_0344.jpeg)
>>69640I have nothing against the anon who posted this, but I’d like to use it as an example about quality control in snow threads after a farmhand banned the 4chan screencap because it wasn’t milky enough for them. documenting troon crimes is not milk, it’s not funny, and I don’t enjoy seeing it in cow threads. I understand why nonna posted it here, since /2X/ is dead and blackpill/radfem posting is not allowed elsewhere, but this brings me to my main point: rules are enforced inconsistently and bans are handed out unfairly. farmhands have made it clear that maintaining quality cow threads is a priority for this site. however, many of their mod decisions (quarantining blackpill/radfem discussion to a dead board so that it leaks out everywhere else because no one wants to use /2X/; banning anons for actual milk in cow threads; banning anons for sarcasm/having a different opinion from farmhands; nuking shitposting threads so the userbase dwindles and cow threads are slow) have undermined this. thank you for your consideration
No. 69685
>>69684I think the idea is that images are a medium, so image dumps fit best in /m/ since it’s not really a discussion topic but a media dump.
>>69680I’m not sure if m would move faster with or without tbh. I have posted in /m/ but it really seems like there’s nothing there for you if you aren’t weebposting or playing whatever shit game is currently the most popular. I never get responses so I usually end up going to ot with it and it gets more attention there.
No. 69688
>>69686/m/ never needed to exist. That and /w/ were conceits of the previous admin and the voting for them was loaded by her friends. If not for that, /w/ probably still would have happened (got a lot of votes) but not /m/ (not much past the line)
/ot/ was already there for it. It still is kek.
No. 69696
>>69680>there should be a separate /i/ boardI'm not against an image dump board but please do not call it /i/ unless you want it to get raided.
>>69688I think /m/ was a good idea and it made sense at the time. IIRC one of the problems /ot/ had is that it was too cluttered and media based threads were often buried several pages in by the popular /ot/ threads. Giving video games, anime and other media their own board solved that issue.
No. 69701
>>69698yeah. i agree with the principle of quality control but it's weird what specifc threads get singled out. why trans cows and dumbass shit but not the unbridled zoomer autism in animation cows, the gachashit threads on /m/ or fandom drama?
also the author cows thread might be better suited for /m/ rather than a cow board. bc there's interesting discussion but it's not always related to specific cows, more like global phenomena like booktok or publishing trends.
No. 69702
File: 1707363480682.png (471.27 KB, 1237x707, confused.png)
What's up with the inconsistent moderation and bans after hellweek is over? Why were these people banned in the LC Screencaps thread on /ot for "derailing," meanwhile the dozens of actual derailing/no contribution posts made during hellweek weren't redtexted? Picrel, original lc theme is banned anons and girltalk theme is the many examples of posts that haven't been banned.
No. 69713
File: 1707375101379.png (217.6 KB, 880x484, isthisbadintegration..PNG)
Is "ntm" twitter speak? I've never heard someone use the phrase "not too much on" on here. I thought they meant "nta" for a moment, but it wouldn't make sense given the context. Should this be reported or is this a minute thing that doesn't matter?
No. 69718
File: 1707398187175.jpeg (189.76 KB, 828x482, IMG_2482.jpeg)
this is what happens when you ban gc discussion in troon threads lol. gj
No. 69732
>>69696>I'm not against an image dump board but please do not call it /i/ unless you want it to get raided.Why? /img/ also works.
>I think /m/ was a good idea and it made sense at the time. IIRC one of the problems /ot/ had is that it was too cluttered and media based threads were often buried several pages in by the popular /ot/ threads. Giving video games, anime and other media their own board solved that issueSolved that issue for a time. Now /m/ is currently so overrun with image dump threads that video games, anime, book and etc. discussions are happening in /ot/ in the art and fandom thread and in /snow/ in the animator and bookcow threads. And there will be more.
No. 69743
File: 1707420532287.png (17.29 KB, 1796x141, Dumbass Shit-161.png)
>>69739>>69734nta but here's one example of it being banned. i don't think it should be banned fwiw but i've seen multiple bans for it in /ot/ within the past few months and one time someone on /snow/ got banned for it just because the word was in a meme image
No. 69753
>>69746If fujosperging gets its own thread, then yume sperging should too. Either both are allowed or none. Regardless, I 100% agree with you because it does nothing but derail and its always the same fucking argument.
>>69744As far as I see, they are. Some retard brought the fujo topic back in the fandom drama OP after it had been deleted in the previous thread. All it does it bring trouble
No. 69760
File: 1707422199423.png (374.44 KB, 1080x810, xA9Wjmf.png)
>>69626>>69512>The internet is simply a different place than it was in the 2010s and everything that lolcow was built around is simply no longer relevant. Admins trying to stubbornly hold on to the echoes of days past are only going to succeed in driving this place into the ground. No one is denying that things will change, but we can maintain community standards. For example, we can discourage stan twitter memes/rhetoric and allow twitter refugees to assimilate to these standards.
No. 69770
>>69769Uh no, you're not supposed to point that out nona. Remember that fujos are the
victims here and we should refrain from hurting their feelings when they can't take what they dish out.
No. 69789
File: 1707441323413.jpg (557.69 KB, 1080x1776, 1000005409.jpg)
Vendettafag is ban evading, the cow isn't even doing anything milky in the screenshot. Just promoting porn. I'm tired of this cowtipping retard.
>>>/w/319222 No. 69792
>>69759Lolcow is not a discord chatroom, learn2integrate.
>>69771This. It was completely ruined because so many anons want to imagefag and personalityfag by posting "lol" and stupid quips without actually contributing anything.
No. 69795
>>69792Are you going to come up with a reason for why having conversations amongst ourselves is a negative thing, because so long as we post imagery with our content we're basically still adhering to this being an imageboard. If the only reason you got is
>WAHHH ITS BAD BECAUSE I DONT LIKE ITthats not a reason kek
No. 69800
>>69760Those reaction pics are so whatever imo I've seen them around. As long as they aren't too overt who cares, agreed with making our community standards better though
>>69780I'm sorry but you sound pathetic and lost. Cry harder
No. 69817
What's going on in the Ridiculous Photoshop thread 7? Users are being told to sage even though their posts are literally on-topic.
>>>/snow/1962925 and under for example.
No. 69818
>>69811That's fair as long as it's entertaining, but it's gotten tedious.
>>69812All I did was ask a question about what's considered derailing. Hardly rule sperging. Calm down
No. 69823
File: 1707503449874.jpg (137.72 KB, 1080x458, 1000005414.jpg)
>>69819Adding in, anon didn't mention this redtext I that thread when i double checked kek
No. 69824
>>69821It’s a pretty common opinion on here that the older a guy is the more likely he is to father a child with mental disabilities/cognitive problems. I believe scientific research backs this up. Give it a google. Also scroll up to the top of the thread and see the same discussion from 9 months ago lol
How old is Tom, 47? He’s old enough for there to be a legitimate increased risk of fathering a disabled child, the chances go up a lot more after 50 and 55 though.
No. 69830
File: 1707506983807.png (159.62 KB, 932x382, what did i do!!!!!.png)
How is this infighting this was just a joke..I've never even tried either of these drugs mod
No. 69834
>>69830This has gotten so retarded so suddenly. I didn’t have much issue with the moderation until the last day of hell week when it seems like a wave of intense autism has overtaken the jannies from nowhere.
>>69821This is the kind of stupid shit that should be getting banned, anons reeeing about innocuous shit because they personally don’t like it. This is the kind of retard who hangs out in meta all the time, is that why mods are taking them as the majority opinion?
No. 69838
File: 1707514048803.jpg (239.7 KB, 966x757, Screenshot_20240209_162531_Chr…)
>>69799>>69798Seeing these next to each other really drives the point home.
No. 69839
>>69836I thought it was interesting that the thread was bumped with deleted posts numerous times before this bait post appeared. Noticed that while catching up on Jill's thread. Just so everyone would see the bait. The fangirl non-con posts about Taylor trying for another kid didn't get any attention, no one took that bait, so the anon had to post something inflammatory to complain about here. The anon makes a grammatical error featured in countless posts by a regular /meta camper and infighter who seems to never get banned for shitting up every thread she doesn't like. The goal is clearly to get them all locked.
I reported the bait post earlier, too. The poster should be banned. Sadly it's probably just the aforementioned person using a vpn.
No. 69841
>>69815Using cockbreath is black pill behavior regardless, keep it to your fucking black pill thread in /2X/.
I can't believe people are being offended by the word bitch but are completely fine with cockbreath in this thread. This is retarded as fuck
No. 69845
>>69840I'm agreeing with
>>69793, sorry if came off as otherwise.
No. 69847
File: 1707520488393.png (107.5 KB, 1120x256, retarded comebacks .png)
>can you provide a reason for how this is derailing considering that it was on topic
>uh…t-take it to meta!!1!
And then whenever we do bring it here we're not dignified with any kind of response kek. If you can't come up with a reason for redtexting something then maybe it shouldn't have been.
No. 69848
>>69847They are bound and determined to suck all the fun out of this site by handing out all these retarded bans and refusing to engage when we push back. Because apparently it’s too difficult to ignore a single post that might be slightly off topic. I rarely even mind derailing unless it gets really carried away. It only really matters in dedicated cow threads anyway (which have been dying for years now). But a handful of posts that are still kind of related to the topic, especially when the topic is broad? Who fucking cares?
Your post probably got reported for derailing because some anons here get insanely
triggered whenever the topic of astrology comes up and don’t realize their autistic need to rage about something usually done in silly fun is way more annoying than somebody making a post about Pluto in Aquarius.
A large number of anons have been complaining about moderation lately. But that just gets ignored because there are a handful of annoying bitches (maybe even jannies themselves) who camp out on /meta/ and can only reply to complaints by crying newfag. Even though many of these complaints are being made by long time farmers, myself included.
No. 69849
File: 1707522097109.png (1.22 MB, 1242x2688, IMG_3368.png)
Since when is “fanart” banned? Especially when it’s making fun of the subject in question? Also if you want more people to visit the cow boards maybe stop locking threads like absolute schoolmarms.
No. 69853
File: 1707523809211.jpeg (377.67 KB, 600x1716, IMG_3369.jpeg)
>>69850there was a dedicated art anon in moos thread for a while. and the absolute masterpieces in shoes threads. I think there should be a distinction between autistic makeup edits and art that’s obviously making fun of them, how is picrel fanart
No. 69855
>>69847I liked your horoscope based takes,
nonnie. I hate that ot has become so serious.
No. 69858
>>69849honestly i get banning retarded edits of pctures but this is clearly OC not a low-quality post.
mods' vision for cow threads really is nofunallowed.jpg
No. 69862
>>69861I think it's at most two people who rage about that thread. But their cancer is spreading.
Why are the admin suddenly absent again? I also think if they do a town hall, the three admin and all moderators should each answer one question with voice chat.
No. 69866
>>69844And how is "cockbreath" not degrading, offensive and oppressive? Why would you like the word cockbreath if you think bitch is oppressive? Do you not hear yourself or am I missing some type of bait in this post?
Seriously. I've only heard incels and blackpills using such language. I'm not arguing if the word bitch is good or bad or not, because I don't give a shit, it's normalized enough now. Do you want the word cockbreather to be normalized as well, then? Is that what you stand for? Do you care enough about women not being called bitch because of "oppression" and yet you want to say stupid shit to them just because they're straight or whatever? You're creepy as fuck.
No. 69872
File: 1707555345453.png (5.48 KB, 622x135, what.png)
how is this infighting? are we not allowed to disagree with other anons anymore
No. 69873
>>69869Fuck I wish you schizos would get 5150d and we could get the farms back. Not everything is a conspiracy against women. Getting
triggered over a word that was originally aimed at faggots because you're desperate to be a
victim is pathetic.
No. 69878
>>69872Bleak. The current state of farmhands
>>69841>Using cockbreath is black pill behavior Being critical of degrading behavior and rightfully mocking it is now suddenly blackpill? How is this even a criticism?
>Waaah stay on your alloted boardNah, like I said women here are sometimes ruthless and hit the jugalar with insults that reflect a rare reality that isn't seen anywhere else on the internet or real life. I'm not a user of this one but it's obvious that it's mocking a specific pathetic behavior, if you feel offended by it riddle me why you would? This insult is directed at a specific degrading and pathetic behavior, not all women like "bitch" is. I like the idea of women policing their own ranks in upholding dignity lel. Calling this "friendly fire" is hilarious. No, women with humiliation fetishes hell bent on degrading the entirety of women and allying with moids are not "friendlies" and ideally it would be nice if they were ousted. Commonly on this site they literally are. And like another anon said "whore" is pretty common here and "thot", "e-thot", "tradthot" etc. so clearly women here aren't above using such insults.
No. 69880
>>69878>Being critical of degrading behavior and rightfully mocking it is now suddenly blackpill?If you use it against women and not moids who are the ones degrading the women you're mocking, then yes.
I suggest mods replacing any mention of cockbreath with another word just like the movie room does, and how 4chan replaces soy with onion.
No. 69881
File: 1707585561514.jpg (1.3 MB, 2686x2527, 187765544.jpg)
>>69878>but it's obvious that it's mocking a specific pathetic behavior>This insult is directed at a specific degrading and pathetic behavior, not all women like "bitch" is.no it's not
No. 69887
File: 1707590951539.png (1.09 MB, 1125x1104, on the computer.png)
> In the next day or so we will update [locked hellweek] thread with some statistics about moderator actions over the last 2 weeks, as well summary of what we have learned and any changes for the future.
Been waiting 4 days now…
No. 69888
File: 1707594466285.jpg (106.31 KB, 705x513, dfgdfgdfg.jpg)
I admit, there is a better thread for this post (something about personality disorders in general) and I didn't notice it, but what I posted wasn't even that off-topic, it's literally related to bpd as well. Was 21+ hours ban really necessarry for this?
No. 69890
File: 1707598023370.jpg (139.17 KB, 1080x1111, Screenshot_20240210-173646_Chr…)
Really? You guys silently ban me again for a post of many hours ago just after I complain about being banned for that same discussion? My ban had just expired. How about taking the head out of your asses? People are complaining this site is empty and you guys really want to get rid of the old posters that are still here? Boohoo that unhinged nonna complained on ot about muh retarded janny abilities, maybe stop power trippin and grow thicker skin, you fucking losers.
No. 69896
File: 1707601224959.jpeg (1.19 MB, 1125x2436, IMG_0906.jpeg)
could we close the cat/dog hate threads? the posts in both (particularly the cat hate thread) always come off as borderline and bring out the worst in people. pretty sure the one anon in the screenshot insinuates that she poisons and/or lets her dogs maul cats for fun. people like that are disgusting.
No. 69922
File: 1707618770888.jpeg (78.68 KB, 492x623, IMG_3374.jpeg)
>>69911Not on MY wholesome family values lolcow.farm!
No. 69925
>>69922kek I did immediately think of that thread.
>>69913>claiming unborn children will be retarded.It's news to me that a cow merely talking about possibly getting pregnant = there are potential unborn children in need of protection. Those anti-choice goons are really doing a good job with the rhetoric I see.
No. 69929
>>69920absolutely stellar idea, no way a thread like that could possibly attract tradthots and poltards.
tired of all the fuckers pretending to use manhate as an excuse to be extremely homophobic, i bet you tards are the ones constantly baiting about lesbians too
No. 69944
File: 1707655123450.jpg (132.95 KB, 720x999, ban.jpg)
>racebaiting
I'm not even sure what to say, had the reason been infighting, it'd be wrong but less wrong than this.
No. 69953
File: 1707664085951.jpeg (703.35 KB, 1179x1349, IMG_8184.jpeg)
>>69952>>69951On second look I’m not even sure why I don’t like it. And yeah it doesn’t matter what I think is annoying.
Maybe the farmhand got the ban texts mixed up; the reply to it was more racebait-y by saying Japan architecture is more boring than European (wouldn’t really consider that racebait either but you could argue it is)
No. 69955
>>69954Why is it automated? Its kinda weird that the admins are okay with active harmless threads to be taken down, its almost like they are mad that their gossip boards arent as active as they were in the past so they are trying to take it out on the whole site.
Remember the m/ wipeout? The owners and tech could have fixed that issue if they wanted to but they dont care unless its gossip about some has-been cosplayer.
No. 69966
>>69960I’m not a farmer in that thread and I don’t post there but Tom is an old man with stale sperm and I don’t see what’s wrong with pointing that out
>>69965It’s not about her womb it’s about his sperm
No. 69976
>>69972Yeah and Taylor has no history of lying about anything. But I'm intrigued why you're so hellbent on vouching for Tom and his sperm lol
>fake narratives>assuming isn't helpful for the threadYeah, you think you and the anon in the thread bending backwards to wk for Tom are much different?
No. 70004
nta but
>>69979>unborn childrencan you stop using this phrasing? It's weird. She's not even pregnant.
>>69968clinic never said shit. Not one mention of pcos even.
>proof that it's herwhere?
Do you have a problem where you only believe something is "proof" if the cow itself says it? Do you seriously believe everything the cows on this site say or the reasons they give for their actions? Genuine question btw.
No. 70005
>>70004It's not true or proof from anons just googling. Jesus christ, her thread is fucking stupid with all this sperm and constant baby sperging.
Also anon posted a non-milk screenshot of an underage child just for funsies and spoiled it as NSFW so that they wouldn't get called out for it, Wtf??
>>>/w/319377 No. 70007
File: 1707692207554.png (616 KB, 864x1650, 1000020461.png)
>>70005>underaged childAll children are underage. That post (not mine) doesn't violate any rules of lolcow. See picrel, from
>>>/snow/1960694Taylor has 676k followers. I am glad it was spoilered because it is disgusting.
>>70006you are the same anon doubleposting two minutes apart. 23:40 and 23:42. Stop trying to shit up the thread and get it locked by reporting every single harmless post. Report the bait (as I did) and just stop. Caping for the cow in her thread is really pathetic.
No. 70009
I got banned for reporting one of the posts in this thread suspiciously using trans language unironically (can't remember which, think it's this one
>>69639) but then we are advised to report posts like this
>>69718. I went back to the rules and didn't see any global rule for man-speculating, it's only listed as a rule in /ot/
maybe I'm retarded but where is the line here?
No. 70010
>>69979>>70005>>70006I'm pretty sure this is all the sane anon. Moreover, I assume it's our resident "close the thread!11!!" whiner.
First. The thread is called Taylor and Tom. Discussing him is not out of place.
Second. You'll be surprised to find out but it takes two people to make a baby. Whether you like it or not, he will be mentioned.
Third. Anons told Tom's defender (was it you, too?) to look up the older threads for more info, but they keep whining about no proof, insist that "she said it was because of her, so we should take her word for it". Oh, wait the same argument was brought here. Hm…
No. 70016
>>70014That’s such a weird way to think about it. I guess I have multiple unborn children wow I never knew!
Nobody uses that phrase that way except you. You are the weird one.
No. 70018
>>70010You're right, it's the same anon, possibly using VPNs. The same kinds of grammar errors, awkward ESL phrases, and:
>>69972>These facts are coming from the cow. Assuming isn't helpful to the thread and creates fake narratives.>>70005>refusing to take the cow at her wordlmao as if we just accept whatever cows say as truth on this site.
>>70008>wrong facts that the cow didn't even attest toIn the thread:
>>>/w/319409>But she said it wasn't him >>>/w/319395>Didn't Taylor say she was at fault for the IVF being needed? […] They've addressed this."Proof" for this anon is the cow saying something.
No. 70021
File: 1707731181060.jpg (460.85 KB, 1080x2172, Screenshot_m.jpg)
Admins please create /img/. The picspam is getting out of hand.
No. 70022
>>70019>something we can't even prove besides what the cow said and filmedYou still refuse to google the damn thing and search in the old threads. Stop trying to make others take Taylor's word for it as if it's gospel. The thing is, the "proof" is in her infertility series. She doesn't say it herself, but she posted enough clues without knowing.
Not sure if it's the same anon, it very much could be, but someone posted a video from 3 years ago where she briefly mentioned pcos to prove a point. This is getting retarded.
No. 70028
File: 1707753025444.jpg (167.83 KB, 1088x656, just post imgs tard.jpg)
>>70027That anon claiming to be an old fag but doesn't post images on an imageboard and gets all defensive when called out for it. What a retard
No. 70031
>>70029The only unhinged one is Tom's WK begging to be spoonfed and bringing up ancient videos to make a point in Tom's favour, samefagging, possibly VPN-hopping, infighting god knows for what.
If mods were as quick to ban this retard as they are banning outfit discussions, the matter would been settled 10 posts ago.
No. 70038
>>69881Well I can safely say I don't identify with it nor use it kek. It does describe a pathetic behavior that points to a particular reality many are unwilling to address. None of the replies have really discussed this and are just moid accusations. I just don't see why you'd identify with one raving lunatics spazzing. Thot, whore and slut are visible here and are equally non discriminate towards women and misognyistic unlike cock sucker which describes a pathetic behavior one sperg be damned. As I said, arrest me but I like the idea of women policing other women to have and maintain dignity most of the internet praises women for cocksucking. It really is a rarity here.
>>69880>you use it against women and not moids who are the ones degrading the women you're mocking, then yes.Women have freewill and sometimes degrade themselves with this freewill. Assuming women lack agency is mocking. No one's assuming all women are cocksuckers, weirdo. No one has a problem insulting fags but women doing the exact same degrading behavior is suddenly drawing the line.
No. 70051
File: 1707797731723.png (48 KB, 408x362, Screen Shot 2024-02-12 at 11.1…)
>>69702Again, why did this post get redtexted for derailing but the other three posts didn't? None of them include a funny screencap. I don't understand the bans lately they've been really pick and choose.
No. 70063
>>70057>Conversations have slowed down everywhere.To be fair it is a Monday night. The slow conversations are due to overmodding sure, but the constant "newfag" harping is also contributing to thread slow down too. It's getting annoying that so many anons just respond to everything in the most bad faith way possible.
>We're in the end times.I don't think so. I think you're jumping the shark kek. Nonas have been saying lolcow was dying since 2018. We're all still here.
No. 70080
>>70057Anons should be scared to post because they might get hit with a derailing if the farmhand disagrees with them.
>>70070I fucking hate those threads, those and the pathetic confessions thread are the crux of my existence.
No. 70086
File: 1707825384225.jpg (33.66 KB, 590x350, 1000017403.jpg)
Get Back Here And Answer For Your Crimes Fagmin
No. 70091
>>70088Circumcisionfag started off in the
cursed mommy thread like 10 hours ago. Why are they still running free?
No. 70096
Huge influx of highly unintegrated posts, hi cowing, and infighting over at the Vtuber thread in /m/, starting here and going all the way to the newest post
>>>/m/355531. At this point, it seems like the thread is turning into what the kpop thread used to be.
No. 70097
>>70091please ban circumcisionfag, who is now racebaiting in
>>>/ot/1880012. only scrotes care this much about circumcision
No. 70099
>>70091>>70092I don't understand the hateboner people have against that thread. It's not really that active and one of the least
problematic discussion threads on this entire site
No. 70108
File: 1707838937753.jpeg (170.57 KB, 1022x749, 985802F5-AF8B-413E-803E-6B68E9…)
>>70105here I come on my noble steed
No. 70115
>>70111>I’m afraid other anons have already jumped shipI think a good 60% of users left after shaymin fucked up the site and made it unusable for a huge portion of users for what was it, months? That did such huge damage.
Now we’ve been trying our best to get by with 40% of the previous population, and cerbmin decided out of nowhere to autosage one of the most popular threads and farmhands start issuing bullshit bans even in low-importance /ot/ threads, causing the anons who were left to give up.
Imo the moderation team needs to cut it out right now if we want any chance of surviving, but even if the nonsense stopped today, I don’t know if we could recover. Every board is a ghost town and it’s making me so upset because none of this had to happen.
No. 70137
File: 1707850652795.png (398.95 KB, 630x618, 1706691415261833.png)
Hellweek statistic update and townhall when
No. 70166
>>70164It's really obvious in some cases. Here's one:
>>69220Pretty sure this is another:
>>69604The mod likes to double-post even though normal users get banned for that.
No. 70171
>>70167KEK
>>70168Glad to hear from you cerbmin
No. 70176
>>70168Why is a random anon taking offense at some schizo "tranny janny" insult then?
>>>/meta/69290Why is one asking for links for issuing bans? Why is there someone posting here all the time who seems to know why some post got banned even though every other anon doesn't? Sorry to second-guess you. but well, I am.
No. 70177
>>70176>Why is a random anon taking offense at some schizo "tranny janny" insult then? nta, but I think it's because it's a stupid thing to tinfoil about when there's so many other legitimate problems. It just comes across a little schizo
inb4 "you're a mod too!"
No. 70179
File: 1707873659767.jpg (27.4 KB, 1280x720, hurry the fuck up.jpg)
>>70168>by the end of the week.Do you mean the end of the calendar week - Saturday, or the end of the work week - Friday? Picrel only makes sense if it's for Friday
No. 70180
>>70177Don't be silly, bc the posts I linked did have specific information in them. I should have omitted the "seethe and cope" and instead pointed out the other tell:
>No, this is just what it looks like when they actually redtext everything.That was the answer to an anon saying that retarded posts actually skyrocketed during hellweek (in her opinion, based on what she saw). How would anyone without inside information know that "this is just what it looks like when they red-text everything"
I can't find the other post but some anon claims farmhands can't reveal they are farmhands if asked. That's fucking weird.
No. 70186
>>70162There's an entire fucking board for feminist discussion, which includes a dedicated black pill thread, were anyone is free to vent about troons and tradtards. /pt/ and /snow/ should not be politicised.
>but it's deadThen post there and make it active.
No. 70187
File: 1707875407140.jpg (634.85 KB, 1000x700, 1699568435379.jpg)
>>70161How come after my "infighting" ban expired I was silently issued a 24 hour ban for an almost 1 day old post that I made before the one I was banned for as soon as I made a joke about tranny jannies banning people? Of course that ban wasn't fair and they know it but why did it hurt them so much that they had to ban me a second time for an old post instead of simply giving me a 2 day ban they are so fond of? Why not ban me for this "conspiracy theory" then? They're banning people for jokes anyway, nothing out of ordinary, so why not ban me for this instead of digging an early post and ban me for infighting again? No one can explain to me why I was banned again for an old post when I already served a ban, all I get are absurd accusations of doubleposting and samefagging and whatever shit I didn't do, all while other people in the "infighting" didn't get any bans. You bootlickers are so damn tiresome but no matter how much you suck this inverted penis it won't turn into a vagina and I am tired of keeping shit to myself just for fear of being banned, if I'm gonna get bans for stupid crap Imma go as retarded as the mods what am I fucking losing here
tranny tranny tranny tranny tranny tranny tranny No. 70188
>>70170It will be autosaged for the foreseeable future.
>>70183We are creating a specialized thread to present key statistics and respond to your questions. Any proposed changes will be announced well in advance and will be thoroughly discussed before implementation.
No. 70200
>>70188Why won't you ever address the fact that all the threads mentioned here
>>70190 also have the same issues dumbass shit had? At this point dumbass shit is currently more chill than 90% of /ot/. If you autosage us autosage them all.
No. 70203
>>70201This won’t fix anything, just unsage dumbass shit ffs
>>70188There is literal schizophrenia in the vent thread rn and I blame admin
No. 70204
>>70200That's the thing, dumbass shit really was just about the chillest thread in /ot/. Cerbmin wants to pretend they did it for real reasons like racebaiting etc, but really it's just because they are bitter the site is evolving into something different than the cow boards it started with.
No one has mentioned this yet, but does no one see how absurd it is to claim that newfags were being attracted to the site just to use the dumbass shit thread? No tiktok zoomer is going "I know where I must go. The dumbass shit thread #394 at lolcow.farm /ot/ page 2."
No. 70209
>>70204it's bewildering. tiktok zoomies would be in the vivziepop or cosplay threads.
>>70207agreed. how would people feel about an imageboard that keeps it simple- no gore, porn, or illegal content?
No. 70215
>>70207There's nothing nonsensical about the decision. The thread was cancer. You mean to tell me you have
so little to contribute outside of shitposting for attention? Because that's what it sounds like.
No. 70224
>>70215nta but it's nonsensical because it's not being applied equally. if someone's going to autosage just because they think it's cancerous, do that towards every other cancerous thread too. personally that's what annoys me the most, unpopular opinions, vent threads, and fandom drama are
consistently shitflinging yet they don't get the same treatment. why? there's tons of threads in /snow/ that attract newfags yet again, still don't get the same treatment. even some threads in /m/ like the gacha ones and vtubers.
No. 70236
>>70230I can't believe that users who are over 18 can't tell the difference between a chatroom and a discussion. Those threads are chatrooms now, replying to others with "lol" and other useless shit. This is why crackdowns on threads have been happening. Mods are trying to weed out these users on all boards, ones who contribute nothing.
But you can't say that because it "ruins the lolcow experience" which those anons are the ones ruining threads, getting them shut down, autosaged, ban evading like the mods can't tell.. I swear, anons just use these threads because they like kicking up dirt and being obnoxious. That's their fun. They don't care about lolcow as a whole, they care about pissing off the mods, trying to get anons to gang up on mods and admin. It's clear what they are doing and admin seems to see it too.
No. 70268
>>70258And they can see that you're all the same three to four samefags. So what now?
>>70255 Exactly what they are doing right now. They don't even realize
they are the reason most people jumped ship. They belong on crystal Cafe.
No. 70273
File: 1707884147598.jpeg (436.17 KB, 735x1105, IMG_0414.jpeg)
Why did farmhands only ban the anon arguing against grandma-chan and not grandma-chan for infighting in
>>>/ot/1884284? just because the nonna was criticizing a mod decision?
No. 70274
>>70268Anyone who doesn't like the site can leave and that's basically something that doesn't even need an explanation. It's like watching a movie that you know will
trigger you and still complaining about it. Don't like it, don't watch it. Don't like moderation, leave. Simple.
No. 70275
>>70269This
>>70255>>70263Kek, the notion that anons are only allowed to have opinions about moderation if theyre directly giving farmhands pocket money is the most pants-on-head retarded argument you’ve come up with yet. Sure, cerbmin and farmhands aren’t contractually bound by a monetary contribution to make good decisions, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be making good decisions anyway.
No. 70284
>>70278>ugh i know im not supposed to use it i just dont give it a shit!!1 >wow my post was satirical how did you not get that? Saying something retarded and then backpedaling with
it’s a joke you wouldn’t get it doesn’t work kek
No. 70285
>>70273It’s getting super transparent now. I think we’re still dealing with the old admin, I really can’t believe it. I say this because brings up a good point:
>>70270>you sound like oldmin with the constant "I don't owe you shit!!!!!!"Is exactly the
toxic attitude adopted by former admin before she got “run off” and “replaced”. The amount of “anons” here parroting exactly admin’s arguments is extremely suspicious and is something that old admin used to employ to in a sad attempt to shift public opinion. I used to think this tinfoil was retarded but I really believe it now. She couldn’t help but go back to her old ways as soon as she received even the slightest criticism.
No. 70287
>>70285Truly comical that you think we are all ~Admin~ for not agreeing with you.
>>70280>s-s-stupid f-f-faggot b-bootlickerGod I swear some of you are genuinely disabled kek it's cow-tier
No. 70290
File: 1707884626956.png (1.15 MB, 1250x833, IMG_1700.png)
>>70286>misfit toysOkay Rankin-Bass let's stop the infight now.
No. 70291
>>70286>misfit toys Kekkk
lighten up ♥
No. 70293
>>70273The same reason I got banned and no one else for infighting, they just hate that you express discontent with the moderation, they don't even hide it. You ask them to explain they simply can't.
>>70287Explain then.
No. 70304
File: 1707885237844.png (871.58 KB, 593x647, m1wg5o1qsij71.png)
>>70302
chatroom chan
No. 70305
>>70300Whatever schizo. We are
all Admin, huh? Seizuring because you can't post retarded memes rapidfire
No. 70315
>>70312>post on /pt/banned for necro
>post on /snow/ banned for derailing
>post on /w/banned for nitpicking
>post on /ot/banned for infighting
>take it to /meta/radio silence
No. 70320
>>70312Huh huh unga bunga big tard mongo dongo
Got that? Course you do, you're fluent in bootlicking.
No. 70321
>>70319Asking for anons to link posts isn't strictly a staff request. If I was one, I wouldn't need to bother asking. Also admin said no farmhands post without their tags, so keep pushing this tinfoils that
users are farmhands because it's still obvious who you are regardless if you sage or not, /meta/fag.
No. 70345
>>70342i already explained here
>>70224 and agree with the posts here
>>70190 >>70200
>>70220 . it's about the hypocrisy
No. 70346
>>70345Nothing is consistent on this site. The moderation is not consistent nor is it unbiased.
>>70293Yes, criticism of moderation means someone will go digging in your ip history to find something, anything to ban you for. It's happened to me. I don't use dumbass shit either, but I also know that if you argue something on principle in /meta/, a certain couple of "anons" will screech at you to enjoy your bans. It's like there's no possibility to consider a bigger picture. If you defend that X should be discussed before taking Y action, you are obviously a huge fangirl of X. That's the only argument they can turn to before banning you for something else.
I once got a 3-day ban for a saged 4-day-old post that broke no rules.
No. 70352
>>70349I think an issue bigger than getting more removed from imageboard roots is just that we got too social and too many anons developed a really strong attachment to the site that they shouldn't have. Back in the OG days we also felt strongly about the site, but on a much different level. Even if you got an unjust ban, you'd just do something else. If someone said something truly retarded, well, it's lolcow, it's a shittalking site, who cares. The people who took lolcow too seriously were cows themselves. Remember Spoony and her "I can only socialize on imageboards and you're taking my only social outlet away from me"? That kind of person is a dime a dozen now. People who consider lolcow their last refuge of social and political freedom are the true problem. It was never meant to be more than a site to talk shit about internet retards losing their mind feeling persecuted over their online posts and somehow along the line the userbase
became internet retards losing their mind feeling persecuted over their online posts.
No. 70356
File: 1707910045115.png (137.7 KB, 2130x388, Screenshot 2024-02-14 at 12.26…)
>>70354>The most active posters are the most obnoxious ones latelySpoony was the most active lolcow user in her time period too, and whenever she got banned she'd run to moid boards and get us raided. I'm just saying cows follow a specific pattern and we currently have a whole handful of Spoonys running around. The raids have luckily eased up thanks to this admin team's efforts, but the fact remains that those users we're speaking of are bonafide cows that would have gotten the full thread treatment before. This post from 7 years ago might as well be posted today, we're dealing with the same level of aggressive cow trampling all over the site but we don't really punish it anymore. Bans aren't enough. None of these cows stopped on their own until they were thoroughly humiliated.
>>>/pt/283531I know we know who some of them are and it just feels too cruel to put them on blast after they demonstrated their retardation by doxing themselves all over discord, but at some point it has to stop. I'll do it if nobody else will No. 70366
>>70355nta but rancefag only got her nudes deleted because she cried to the admins about it and claimed she was in a manic state kek. all the other nude posters would have never gotten this treatment
>>70365romaniananon also has a twitter that was posted in the peronal cows thread, yet she still shits up the vent thread to this day
No. 70370
>>70368oh yeah kek i remember. She was larping as le mentally ill schizo
femcel, giving her a thread would only be cattering to her.
No. 70385
>>70187Yeah I've had this happen to me as well and it's weird. Days old /ot/ post getting a stupid ban after someone reported a more recent (but not ban-worthy) post of mine.
I think it's their way of shutting certain conversations that they don't like down without making it obvious by having 1 party be unjustly redtexted.
No. 70386
>>70384First step: face
Second step: full doxxxxx
You understand there are nuances to milking a cow, right? Why are you panicking?
No. 70416
File: 1707932495961.png (328.84 KB, 934x738, what is going on with you.png)
Whats with every single discussion getting banned as derailing now? Are we really expected to stop talking about the content posted in cow threads? I don't understand why that would be the new way because LC as revolved around analyzing thread subjects, not just solely posting milk and nothing else.
No. 70428
>>70425You know that losing the users from those threads wouldn't ruin the site. Those aren't even the only highly trafficked threads. This hypothetical about anons leaving and the site dying is so laughable and a true delusion.
>>70427Admin said there's a few samefagging anons just pushing out a bunch of bait, so most likely just double-posting and replying to themselves.
No. 70436
File: 1707934291565.jpeg (107.56 KB, 750x229, IMG_6628.jpeg)
No. 70437
>>70429Don’t forget,
>everyone I disagree with is just samefagging and replying to themselves!biggest cope ever
No. 70438
>>70415sorry girl but i'm not really buying the "brave truth-teller who is definitely NOT assmad" thing when you're chasing me to meta to vent about your ban.
anyway i have no problem w/ difference of opinion - i called Anna pretty in the thread yesterday lol - it's that you're endlessly samefagging on the same topic. it's tiresome,
sus given that the cows are known to self-post in leftcows, and just derails the thread. a ban isn't the end of the world, relax and live to post another day
No. 70445
File: 1707935061189.jpeg (297.08 KB, 828x650, IMG_0426.jpeg)
>>70443No way… she’s a Zionist too? Didn’t cerbmin lock the Israel/Palestine thread kek. This seems a little tinfoil but hilarious if true
No. 70454
File: 1707935670173.jpeg (163.7 KB, 750x383, IMG_6631.jpeg)
>>70445>sperg>uglier Radfem uses both of these words kek and she would be the type to lock the thread over something stupid like people arguing