File: 1737145376187.jpg (24.28 KB, 394x400, 1703539851968898.jpg)
No. 89038
File: 1737145492874.png (5.75 KB, 425x95, Screenshot 2025-01-18 at 01-19…)
this is a cap from the mtf thread. can you ban posters that talk like obvious gendies/troons in the trans threads? they do not belong here.
No. 89039
File: 1737145584054.png (174.43 KB, 688x459, Screenshot 2025-01-18 at 01-25…)
>>89038btw, this is what its replying to which makes it seem like its troons themselves competing between each other.
No. 89045
File: 1737173125330.jpg (84.45 KB, 1467x140, uwucide.jpg)
NTA but I won't stand for the anti-uwu moderation. This isn't even being used as an emoji/emoticon. At least make an announcement stating the use of uwu in its slang form is against the rules now
No. 89049
File: 1737204762980.jpeg (397.66 KB, 569x921, IMG_7234.jpeg)
Can you do something about the retards writing weird fanfic of fanny/polyglotplatypus's porn comic OCs pls
No. 89052
File: 1737213294165.jpg (43.66 KB, 929x271, bait.jpg)
calling a random butch woman a borderline pedophile doesnt get you redtexted for bait but getting called a fujo is somehow a death sentence. mods, stop showing your bias for 1 second.
No. 89055
>>89052Yes, because you brought them up out of absolutely nowhere when there are
plenty of appropriate threads to seethe about them in. Do you think it's only the fujos who laugh at personalityfags?
No. 89079
File: 1737240937309.jpeg (162.65 KB, 992x262, IMG_6869.jpeg)
>>89078“sewerslide” its a self censor for suicide
No. 89081
>>89079Fuck off if that’s a self censor kek. Don’t people just use the term sewerslide for the sillys, I know I do because it just sounds funny and unserious, same as the term “an hero”. Fair enough if it was
unalived or had asterisks to censor letters.
No. 89085
>>89074if you don't want to see people shitting on fujos, then hide the lesbian thread. It's expected that most of the posters on there are lesbians, so why would you go into that thread and be upset that ssa women are
triggered by males?
No. 89092
File: 1737257170109.gif (9.71 MB, 311x177, rotating ron.gif)
>>89085>if you don't want to see people shitting on fujos, then hide the lesbian thread. NTA. The infight over fujos has happened in like twenty different threads at this point. I'm totally sick of hearing about it and I don't fault the farmhands for being heavy-handed when it breaches containment.
I don't know what it is about that particular topic that just ignites anons' autism so hard. It's just a stupid genre of manga, it's fine to hate it and it's fine to like it. I swear, anons get more heated about retarded gay cartoons than normies do about Israel/Palestine. It's tiresome, no one is ever going to change their minds, and I'm pretty sure it's the same ten or so people regurgitating the same handful of talking points at each other ad-nauseum.
>>89072Idk what you would consider petty, but people have been getting redtexted over the fujo/anti-fujo debate for literal years now. The argument should not be happening outside of containment threads period, and bans should (and generally have been) handed out to infighters regardless of where they stand on the issue.
No. 89093
>>89085people gave been going on about muh foojos all over the place not just one thread. that's why the topic is contained
>>89087agreed. tifs should be permabanned on sight
No. 89105
File: 1737273010957.png (181.61 KB, 975x384, image.png)
>>89100>>89101>come to the lesbian thread>tell ssa women to imagine dicks as fingers>doesn't get bannedwhy wont you fags learn to read the thread instead of crying to farmhands about being called out. straight women and alike are expected of being criticized by lesbians. dont like it? learn to hide the fucking thread next time instead of shitting and crying about gay women being gay and having opinions that might hurt osa women.
No. 89111
>>89109seems like its the same few gendies vpn hopping, theyve been at it for more than a week now. cant wait for them to have a meltdown about the vpn ban on /ot/ kek
>>89087>>89090seconding these, when you give an inch troons take a mile.
No. 89118
>>89114it’s one of the funniest ones i’ve seen in a while that’s for sure.
overcompensating wayy too hard to sound like a rapey man without knowing it proves us right kek. oh and look, speak of the devil!
No. 89139
File: 1737293901503.gif (296.09 KB, 220x128, IMG_7626.gif)
>collective female rape ritual
No. 89150
>>89129Does that mean the "You Whores" anon from a few years ago may have been a TIF? Terrifying thought.
>>89141Thank you for dealing with the situation!
No. 89151
>>89147if you’re the tif good job, kudos, very funny.
but stop shitting up the site you attention starved faggot
No. 89159
>>89158this one isn't an AGP, its a TIF who despises terfs and doesn't realise how much of a self own it is for her entire fap folder to be yuri. you see yourself as a girl when masturbating, you arent "a man" you're a confused female and always will be! get therapy instead of cutting your tits off retard
she's been shitting up the site for days, we need that VPN ban ASAP
No. 89164
File: 1737309113693.gif (232.87 KB, 280x280, thankyourats.gif)
thank you for unbanning me! i'll be good
No. 89208
>>89205bro if it's not bj chan then it's another poster with her exact typing style and fixations. I was defending her as well. how am I a "physiatry dick rider"
>>89204there's really not. it's just variations on the same theme over and over going through episodes and struggling with autism, being female, and living in Poland.
No. 89226
>>89202how do you even know of this person's reddit? did the retard failed to remain anonymous? i feel there are a lot of mentally ill anons (on top of obvious immaturity) here than people realize
>>89207grimes spends so much time wking for elon and trying to get his attention they need to merge. grimes is practically obsessed with elon (kinda by design since he keeps dangling his kid in front of her for pr shit). the only person who took issue with it seems very immature and should get a diary instead
>>89224idk how people can let that vitamin deficient retard get under their skin tbh. jill is so predictable like every every other bpdfag in that they always have this drive to be a
victim No. 89232
File: 1737404591756.jpg (145.12 KB, 963x447, 1000022467.jpg)
This got redtexted in /ot/ Ugly Male Psyop for infight/bait and not the actual baiter calling other anons "pedophiles" if they disagree that shaving legs is pedophilic? Seriously? And that anon got to bait for four hours with no redtext or ban?? Gee…how strange.
No. 89239
File: 1737417077131.png (158.09 KB, 1080x310, 1735155277473.png)
Quick reminder that skirbyfags are rape apologists and mods still give them a million chances regardless
No. 89261
File: 1737435949007.png (2.09 MB, 3500x3500, 1640018059665.png)
pathetic raid
No. 89278
>>89276I came here to post about the anon who is hi cowing like a newfag and accusing anons of being her Juicy tranny friend because they assume whiteknighting. Nothing about the post calling him a goomba was whiteknighting kek Can't believe you're upset over an anon saying she's right he looks like a goomba.
>European timezoneDo you know what website you are on and how many anons of various timezones interact with this website? That anon is an utter retard.
No. 89290
File: 1737466411198.png (Spoiler Image,434.28 KB, 828x901, yeah okay.png)
spoilered for yuri hentai forgot to do it like 2 times kek
i feel like this just proved my theory correct, anyone agree?
No. 89296
>>89293Sorry, but at a certain point anons need to learn how to identify bait, and they need to learn to report and ignore it instead of responding to it. It's annoying when anons fall for the same bait over and over again and it gets old very quickly. Obviously, not every stupid post is bait, but there are certain topics that are well-known as infight fodder.
I don't think scrotefoiling should be banned either. I think that the original reasoning behind it was that farmhands were getting a lot of "moid" reports, and they just got too lazy to deal with it. I don't think that's a good enough excuse to make it a bannable offense, but at the same time I guess it ties into the "report and ignore" idea.
No. 89297
>>89268>We put up with months of all of your retarded abortion circular reasoning infightsSo because I disagree with the left-leaning people I must extremely right-leaning then, huh? There's no other explanation for it? Nah, you know what? Screw it. It's a waste of my time and yours trying to argue this when it's pretty clear. I've learned that being skeptical of other people and NOT blindly accepting their claims is punishable on here. Instead of thinking for myself, I have to follow the herd mentality. And instead of challenging people and asking for facts to back up their arguments, I need to shut up and keep my head down.
To hell with it. You guys have to live with yourselves, but I don't. So long.
No. 89312
>>89306Schizo ramble aside, even if they set up a separate website to archive things someone would have to fund the hosting
So now you’ve just created a second problem
No. 89320
>>89317So why aren't they redtexted though? That would prevent more people from replying, I reckon.
And don't say it's about jannies not having the time, I've seen racebait redtexts in a matter of minutes.
No. 89337
File: 1737497187614.jpg (815 KB, 1080x2059, 00109293991.jpg)
Why are anons in the female fantasies thread being allowed to post photos of/thirst over clearly underage girls?
No. 89346
>>89344KEK
>>89345it's specifically the tif though, they're very noticable. there's a couple rn
No. 89354
File: 1737512056910.png (286.87 KB, 680x543, stop feeding the trolls!.png)
>tfw you dont want to minimod by telling nonas to stfu and not reply to bait but they keeping doing it even after multiple posts trying to prevent the derail
No. 89357
File: 1737516565827.gif (16.8 MB, 640x480, FARMHANDS SEND HER TO THE PAST…)
>>89356i feel bad for the report queue i probably clogged up ever since the spergeout started happening. i feel like vidrel
No. 89363
>>89360well the way nonas are going about it isnt a better option. Yeah farmhands are inept at deleting shitposts but the "good faith user" in question is flinging shit at everyone and clogging up the thread with redundant whining.
> getting away with saying retarded shit and having a captive audience.well there you have it, the captive audience in question are retards responding or acknowledging their shitposting. note that this all started because the supposed "schizo personalityfag" is making others look crazy by deleting their replies. You know how that wouldnt work? If theres no fucking interaction in the first place to make the anon look crazy.
ignoring it isnt a perfect solution, it certainly doesnt improve things, but fuck is it better to actually talk about the topic on hand instead of going in circles with people who wont take your complaints in good faith.
No. 89364
File: 1737519238087.jpg (163.19 KB, 720x1059, 1000000412.jpg)
Why the fuck has LC become a discord server now?
>>89358That's literally whats happening kek and they think they're super cute too. They talk like 14 year Olds.
No. 89371
should we argue about soap again
>>89341>>89345Nta but it's because the poster constantly, consistently whines about "terfs" (and at one point tried to brag about aiden pussy)
No. 89389
>>>/pt/951777Any particular reason we're giving the Cuck
Onision views? mirror that shit so we don't give him views.
No. 89390
File: 1737568921607.jpg (48.21 KB, 1080x379, 9192883828.jpg)
>>89337Why are jannies banning those speaking against it for "infighting", while letting the other posts stay up unpunished? It has literally been confirmed that at least one of the girls is underage.
No. 89397
File: 1737577383150.png (237.33 KB, 950x1072, Screenshot_20250123_011521_Fir…)
Why is this redtexted for bait when I was asking a genuine question?????? I posted this in a lesbian thread, so it's not like it was ot or against the rules. I don't know what's wrong with it.
No. 89403
File: 1737600341443.jpeg (99.14 KB, 1212x350, IMG_1344.jpeg)
Why was that red-texted with vain bitch? It was agreeing with another anons rant in theoff your chest thread. That anon wasn’t redtexted at all for her rant. But this “absolutely based” comment was redtexted? That makes no sense. Which jannie was spamming the vain bitch ban?
No. 89428
File: 1737650344985.png (261.43 KB, 1226x1222, Screenshot 2025-01-23 at 11.28…)
>>89408Agreed, I hate the pearl-clutching over anons snarking on her looks, claiming it's "not milk" and only wanting to focus on moral posting.
As long as it's saged, it doesn't matter if it isn't milky. The issue is that anons are posting that shit unsaged. But making fun of a cow's looks is obviously part of the board's culture. Picrel is just a sample from Pixielocks's first thread in /pt/. These redditards need to go back if they can't cope.
>>89426Seconding this.
No. 89429
File: 1737651572227.jpg (99.56 KB, 1250x406, 432526.jpg)
Farmhands are UK pedos, got it.
No. 89431
This lolitafag won't post caps of anything they keep bringing up and when called out about it their reasoning is "you're missing the point". They already got in trouble once for this and they are keeping it going, still refusing to post caps as if being blocked by the cow suddenly makes all DMs disappear. Anon is full of shit. They need to put up or shut up. I'm so tired of these jirai/lolita farmers in both threads acting like this.
>>>/w/343124 This reminds me of the k-pop threads when people would just type their shit and not actually add any info that's proof-proof.
No. 89437
File: 1737666346157.png (138.77 KB, 2724x464, Capture d’écran 2025-01-23 à…)
>>89436kek came here to post this, they sound straight outta reddit with the "sexism against men" accusations too
No. 89463
File: 1737707679974.jpg (40.95 KB, 891x265, ot.jpg)
Being from Britain is now a protected characteristic, like race or sexual orientation?
>>>/ot/2262680 No. 89465
File: 1737710140866.jpg (345.8 KB, 1080x2240, 1000019018.jpg)
Uh how is this cowtipping? Its not my comment to Dana. Do the new mods even know what cowtipping is? Is posting random strangers calling out cows considered cowtipping now?
No. 89468
>>89464It's seems to be a mod or a user with mod protection derailing the thread again and again by provoking others with her inflammatory bullshit:
>>>/ot/2363158>>>/ot/2363157>>>/ot/2363153>>>/ot/2363132>>>/ot/2363142Mental illness.
No. 89470
>>89468Complete tinfoil but there's a least 2 of them. They have their spell correct set to British English but make use of the Oxford comma typical of American English
>this, this, and thisvs
>this, this and thisThere's the odd phrase like borough which is kinda correct but not really used.
One also completes her sentences with a full stop and the others don't.
In conclusion it's all a bit tiresome.
No. 89473
File: 1737728419637.jpg (359.76 KB, 1080x1652, 1000016677.jpg)
Why did I get a warning in Lesbian General for saying I like my media without men in it, but the anon right below me gets to post literal yaoi without issue?
Flood detected etc (couldn't get the image to send)
No. 89475
File: 1737730418167.png (145.02 KB, 1080x405, markup_1000013851.png)
Fucking kek. Just let them shit up another thread, great solution. Fucking retards
No. 89480
File: 1737742285445.jpeg (387.72 KB, 828x1072, IMG_7315.jpeg)
pls get rid of this racebaiting retard in the britbong thread.
all she ever does is post outrage bait from far right twitter accounts, even tommy fucking robinson. it's easy to tell who it is just from the filenames.
No. 89498
>>89494Thank you for understanding
nonnie! It’s true that only some accounts post about this stuff because you can literally get in trouble with the police or work or anything which is why the majority don’t post their true thoughts on the matter.
No. 89512
File: 1737762287134.jpeg (561.97 KB, 1284x2499, IMG_0544.jpeg)
>>89511read the fucking rules. fucktard.
No. 89517
>>89513>>89512a vendetta against newfags anons, not a vendetta against a cow or the posters specifically.
i don’t care personally but i notice it a lot and it’s what it looks like sometimes (not all the time) i’m not
>>89503i will be actually schizo here and say it could be apart of this convo in retarded bans
>It definitely feels like someone is trying to change lc into what the rest of the internet thinks we are, girl 4chan.>>>/ot/2363155 No. 89519
>>89517newfaggotry is literally against the integration rule, not to mention annoying to read, and that's why it gets bans. this place has a modicum of qaulity cintrol, if you don't like it just go find another board with looser moderation.
if you keep getting called a newfag after 6 years, it means your posts are unintegrated and retarded. no vendetta here, just what the youth of today call a skill issue.
No. 89523
>>89519>>89521reading comprehension nonas? i know the rules kek. i don’t know exactly what
>>89503 gets banned for so maybe she is just unintegrated, that doesn’t mean that sometimes its unwarranted
No. 89528
>>89527i’ve seen it a few times here and there, again
not all the time, but i notice it. most hate towards newfags is justified but sometimes people actually have no idea on if they are or not. it’s to be expected but i don’t want it to kill lc
No. 89529
>>89523if multiple people interpret your comment the same way maybe it's because your "vendetta agaubst newfags" wording was retarded.
>>89526people get called newfags when they stand out. they don't get called newfags if they integrate. that's the whole point.
if someone keeps getting called a newfag that's because their posts stand out.
>>89528>people have no idea if they are or notwhat you dumbasses don't get is that newfag is not about how long you've actually been here, it's a state of mind. Someone who keeps making unintegrated posts is going to stay a newfag even if it's been years.
No. 89532
>>89506Shut up bitch. Its more interesting than people here asking this place to be even more moderated
>>89523It's cringe hen pecking. It makes the site so boring when you can only post in a certain way without fat chicks who work at dollar general screaming NEWFAG NEWFAG
(infighting) No. 89535
>>89532kek exactly, sometimes it is like okay yeah thats obviously a newfag, but if you’re a
victim of wrongthink you get NEWFAG’d too kek
>>89533pretty much why i even think about it, do they want this to be a space for
fellow women who just enjoy talking and sperging or not?
reeing ‘go back’ at anyone and everyone is unhelpful
No. 89543
File: 1737782340034.gif (49.72 KB, 220x153, IMG_7838.gif)
>>89537NTA, your points are the truth but that doesn’t mean it can’t harm the site and discourage new users from even wanting to integrate.
I’ve seen it years and years ago and it’s always looked more or less the same, newfags unintegrated and posting, and random oldfags with sticks up their asses reeing about the smallest thing.
>the site is dying!>but zoomers cant use itThere is a new generation of social media and younger people, this is all to be expected and will always be this way, complaining and minimodding constantly is redundant and sorta cringe
No. 89557
>>89535>do they want this to be a space for fellow women who just enjoy talking and sperging or not?how do naive women keep pushing this kumbaya shit thinking other women have to tolerate them. first off this is an anonymous imageboard not a safe space. second, if you follow the rules, you can still do that so your entire point is moot.
>>89536This is such a newfag mentality. its apart of the rules so deal with it. don't type in a way that makes you stand out otherwise other anons will notice and report it to the mods. don't like it? there are other imageboards otherwise go back to whatever social media platform you came from.
>>89547you don't have friends here. you have anonymous users you don't even know. this comparison doesnt make sense.
>>89550this comparison also doesnt make sense. some of you guys clearly need to reset your expectations.
No. 89562
File: 1737816231864.gif (123.88 KB, 200x200, 3714-you-really-are-stupid-are…)
>>89557ok r u slow? where tf did i say kumbaya shit hoe. does this look like kumbaya to you!??!??!?
NEWFAG NEWFAF NEWFAG
>>89557(infight bait) No. 89566
>>89557>this comparison also doesnt make sense. The comparison in question:
>Easter bunny>pretzels making me thirsty!>MAZEL TOV!Either I am retarded or you are because that was the whole point, it wasn’t supposed to make sense (p.s. newfag)
No. 89569
>>89567kek imagine being a permanewfag for
6 whole years RIP
No. 89589
>>89587The criticism was not about not wanting his car scratched but his reasoning behind it as
>>89582 said. It's totally reasonable to say 'I dont want my car scratched', saying 'I park near
high quality cars to prevent it', is not.
No. 89590
>>89588Then maybe mods should move it to ot or something? Because every single critical post in the thread ends up here and clogs this thread with useless back and forth.
I for one don't mind the thread. It's my way of keeping tabs on their antics, even if it's them demonstrating their uneducated minds in comments or sm posts kek
No. 89605
>>89589I'm more surprised at his fangirl foaming at the mouth saying his luxury car can't indeed be parked with regular cars kek How is this normal judgement lmao. Both sides deserve each other.
>>89596The average iq in the thread is zero, I swear.
No. 89611
>>89574>>89571>>89568I think whoever is constantly derailing and whiteknighting in the Grimes thread is hoping to get it shut down like the "Skirby thread", since they would have noticed the farmhand post. The Grimes thread has existed for years and been pretty strict about non-content so it's really annoying to see the thread bumped every day, when it used to only be updated with actual news.
There is no reason to "defend" Grimes, in the Grimes thread and speculate on the personal lives of anons posting about Grimes (the purpose of the thread). It's extremely annoying and I wouldn't mind if the thread were temporarily locked, until the weird baiters get bored and find something else to do
No. 89621
>>89615I hate to tell you this
nonnie but I think the DSM-5 is wrong, the definition of Schizoid;
noun is a moid who is schizophrenic. I think you need to get another diagnosis because it’s not nice they called you that, I would seek legal advice
No. 89622
File: 1737913786360.jpg (82.8 KB, 720x384, 1000000451.jpg)
The grimes thread gollums are honestly insane. You cannot make a single reference to Claire's music that isn't wildly negative without them flipping shit. They claim "only a few" are contributing, but all they themselves contribute is tons of long posts with three to nine year old photos or gifs attached. Surely picrel reads as a false complaint to /meta/ given that there isn't actually a huge flux of WKing in grimes thread? Janitorial decisions lately are so dubious that it's hard to tell if you're going to answer to every whim out of laziness or ignore a real issue entirely.
>>89568It's sad that I can't tell if you're the rabid schizo that tantrums if the tone about Claire isn't completely mental or if you're an anon who recognizes that isn't normal. If you're the former, you already shared that you "don't follow any other cows" which means you camp out in the thread with nothing to share and try to tone-police everyone else into subservience. Please relax.
No. 89624
>>89621oh, i'm not, but i wouldn't be surprised if we had users that were.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizoid_personality_disorderaccording to this article schizophrenia is related but different.
No. 89644
File: 1737970572047.jpg (59.61 KB, 1262x329, 6364563.jpg)
Please don't enrol illiterates as Farmhands.
No. 89649
File: 1737997641781.png (67.34 KB, 1426x214, Screenshot 2025-01-27 at 12.05…)
Really wish anons didn't hand hold unintegrated posters. This post also reads as a newfag because who the fuck says "newfriend" other than a retard from tumblr or reddit
No. 89652
File: 1738000256993.jpg (47.95 KB, 464x487, how new.jpg)
>>89649Perhaps you should lurk moar, newfriend. The term has been in use since forever on 4chen.
No. 89658
File: 1738011513281.jpeg (126.76 KB, 1096x596, IMG_5694.jpeg)
>>89649This reads like
>Kek you frens later, anons No. 89666
>>89649kek
>shouldn’t handhold unintegrated posters>unintegrated poster is a middle aged woman using the site for the first time with a real life who came in to post the cows criminal record; i.e milkget the stick out ur butt nd stop minimodding, newfag
No. 89674
>>89672>>89673no i did it to
STAND OUT how the fuck is a newfag gonna do tags and shit
you complete dumbass now stop being butthurt stupid lazy fat bitches and
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT No. 89676
btw this is the
THIRD, OR FOURTH TIME I am literally
BEGGING for the
FAT LAZY BITCH MODDING THE ONISION THREAD TO
DO HER GOD DAMN JOB.
Fucking FIRE HER and get a good janny. and NO I don't want to mod that shit. just GET A GOOD JANNY FOR IT.
>>89675for the janny there? certainly! now
STOP BEING BUTTHURT AND
FIX IT No. 89680
File: 1738083675635.png (46.83 KB, 360x474, 113ccabc-ed71-4da0-960b-5b587b…)
What is happening
No. 89681
File: 1738083702086.jpg (43 KB, 720x300, CentipedeVagina.jpg)
>>89679AND YOU GET THOSE CENTIPEDES OUT OF YOUR BIG FAT GUNT AND DO YOUR GOD DAMN JOB
No. 89682
File: 1738083783502.jpg (25.89 KB, 480x763, chewawa in judgemental pose.jp…)
>>89681I don't have a job the government gives me money because I don't want to work. Stop being aggro all because you can't link posts and you act like a newfag.
No. 89685
>>89683>>>/pt/949568AND YOURE TOO LAZY TO MOD THAT THREAD. ITS NOT MY JOB, ITS YOURS. FUCKING LOOK UP THE GENE POSTS (THAT I MARKED TWICE NOW, HERE AND IN THE THREAD) AND THE GREG VIDEOS AND DELETE THEM.
WHY MAKE THIS ABOUT ME? FOR YOUR OWN INSECURITIES? ITS NOT ABOUT ME, ITS ABOUT
YOU DO YOUR GOD DAMN JOB. I DONT CARE IF YOU GET SCOLDED BY YOUR ADMIN (WHICH FRANKLY, SHE SHOULD FIRE YOUR DUMB ASS)
ITS BEEN FOUR TIMES IN YEARS NOW THAT I ASK YOU TO
DO YOUR GOD DAMN JOB GET RID OF THAT WINE, TAKE YOUR CAT OFF YOUR LAP, GET RID OF THE BOBBONS AND HIT DELETE 4 TIMES
GOD DAMN THIS SHOULDNT BE THAT HARD, YOU FAT FUCKING COW
No. 89688
>>89686>>89687YEAH AND SOMEONE IS SO FAT SHE HASN'T SEEN HER GUNT IN OVER 17 YEARS SO ITS BEEN DECLARED LEGALLY DEAD
THIS AINT ABOUT ME
I DONT GIVE A RATS ASS WHAT YOU THINK OF ME
BUT
MOD THAT FUCKING THREAD IM TIRED OF GOD DAMN ASKING.
(unintegrated/infighting) No. 89689
>>89685You're allowed to post YouTube videos here, anon. You clearly have no idea how threads work. Also most anons spoof the videos and don't watch them, wait for greentext. Shocker for you, but some people follow Onision on
other platforms and they might be watching his videos. Also a view might count due to preview clips shown before you even click on the video to watch it in another tab. This is how YouTube browsing works. Do you need to have your hand held and walked through what happens? He's already demonetized anyway. It doesn't matter if he has views.
No. 89693
>>89689you stupid dumbass, its to prevent greg from getting views. but hey, you put money in his pockets, he must be overjoyed.
you basically gave a scrote a bunch of money.
my compliments.
>>89691yeah, make it safe, make it about me, amrite?
you made me look like whatever, riling me up, and your janny job stays safe, right?
No. 89702
File: 1738091376979.png (264.25 KB, 960x956, Screenshot_20250128-200734~2.p…)
Am I stupid or does this red text make no sense? I take the ban I guess but why the snarky fucking nonsense text?(read your ban reason before ban evading in /meta/)
No. 89704
>>89702>I take the banSo how are you posting this right now then? Ban evasion? Newfags are so annoying and bird-brained.
>>89703It's so fucking annoying.
No. 89713
>>89710It's been that way for years. The ban text is
>vain bitchwhich is mentioned in the rule
>don't respond to other people's rants. It's not about you, you vain bitchit's pretty obvious, if you don't have autism anyway
No. 89722
>>89721This nona
>>89710 said it best:
>you're moderating autism central, the least you could do is make bans clear. No. 89734
File: 1738107027638.png (327.39 KB, 540x511, 1000031664.png)
I'm just saying, when I was a retarded baby newfag I figured out how the GIOYC thread worked the first fucking time I opened it so the anons whining itt have no excuse
No. 89736
>>89722i can't believe peole are still whinging about the vain bitch redtext because reading OPs before you post is apparently too hard.
i hope they don't change a thing, even if you son't think the redtext funny, the people seething about their vain bitch bans are hilarious. it's the best retard filter on this site
No. 89739
>>89735Kek
nonnie did you get the red text and that’s why you’re so butthurt? Why do you want to be coddled so much for your awootism by the jannies
>but but you're moderating autism centralNo. There’s a lot of women here who have jobs, bathe, touch grass and function in the real world and come here in their downtime for a few laughs. Why should mods coddle sensitive retards who earn a short lived ban for breaking rules. I prefer to see
>vain bitch>vain bitchand have a giggle than
>please read the OP don’t reply*>please read the OP don’t reply*>PLEASE READ THE OP DONT REPLYIf it’s not funny to you then ok? and?
No. 89742
>>89739You’re quoting someone else’s posts. Id prefer not to see any or see it sporadically. I think there’s way too much redtext here in general.
>>89741You two sound way more upset than me, I don’t even post in that thread. I don’t think it’s
~offensive~ just stupid.
No. 89746
>>89666samefagging to say that
>unintegrated posteris still currently posting and all of the ‘handholding’ done has made her integrate faster than you have
No. 89752
>>89751If I report a post and it doesn't get a redtext I assume it wasn't banned. If mods didn't redtext anything in that thread I would assume they were ignoring the thread rule and stop reporting. The fact you see the redtext so much is literally a retard newfag issue and not a moderation issue.
I think it also keeps the jannies accountable, if they stopped redtexting bans then we'd never know if they were actually doing their job or not. Imagine they only redtexted permabans or something, they could ignore 99% of reports because we'd all just have to "assume" they banned stuff. It's better this way imo even if its uglier/less welcoming looking.
No. 89754
the absolute state of lc where newfags are so lazy, too stupid to read and whine about everything.
>>89722I'm very curious of the education level of these newfags because I don't think its just autism.
>>89735you keep trying to turn this into a janny issue like a boomer. learn to fucking read.
>>89744 >makes one thread, makes a mistake, whines like a bitchok if you cant learn from your mistakes perhaps youre not cut out for making threads then.
No. 89756
>>89753you will get redtexted for being a shit op and not doing a recap for a cow who needs a recap, anon.
please, go look at any of the redtexted ops and you’ll see a common theme in what they were lacking
No. 89759
>>89744then don't make thread OPs and leave these to people who can actually read.
what's with all these whiny newfags throwing fits when the rules apply to them?
No. 89763
File: 1738169790263.jpg (15.4 KB, 1167x83, 64364366.jpg)
Some failed teacher is moderating /snow/.
No. 89766
File: 1738175435978.png (33.86 KB, 800x182, 100764322156.png)
>>89753>This place is not a forumAckshuyally…
No. 89769
File: 1738180264837.jpeg (150.92 KB, 1027x998, IMG_5775.jpeg)
>>89763Kek reminded me of this from the retarded bans thread. Why is that even a redtext?
>(Yaps too much) No. 89773
>>89772You can't call something 'reddit tier' if you actually use the word 'yapping' kek. I have no idea why newfags want to pretend that this is some kind of
femcel website and act like most anons here aren't mundane straight women that have nigels.
No. 89774
>>89772There's always been venting about relationships in the vent threads. LC predates the concept of "
femcels".
No. 89775
>>89772Go bathe and get a job anon kek. This is not the
female equivalent of 4chan as you all keep claiming.
No. 89797
File: 1738187661022.png (70.56 KB, 251x349, terminology.png)
I just reported spam in the Terminology Thread and I think one of you deleted the whole thread instead of just deleting the spam?
No. 89801
>>89797I fatfingered it but its back now.
>>1706 My bad.
No. 89803
newfags having another meltdown in
>>>/ot/2365279 can we finally agree that its time to lock that shit thread
No. 89812
that thread is so embarrassing. this anon:
>>>/ot/2371710 >>>/ot/2371785definitely seems like a moid. they love to interpret calm responses as hysterical for some reason because they think that women are unable to type out a normal response to bullshit without getting emotional.
No. 89824
File: 1738232954741.png (47.48 KB, 863x213, 1000043367.png)
>>89803Before I went to bed, I reported picrel as infighting, bc that anon just wants to shit on every poster in the thread. Then I wake up to see that other posts like
>>>/ot/2371707 are marked as infighting? Look, the anon who starts this shit is the one who baits and needs a ban.
I'm none of these anons and haven't posted in the thread.
No. 89829
>>89826Nobody in the thread was samefagging.
>>89824The response you linked is very cringe and aggressive, it deserved to be banned of infighting. The post in your picrel isn't infighting or infight bait.
>>89827>not to bitch and moan you broke the rules and had to sit in time outToo few anons understand this point. The majority of the bans in that thread are just self-posts by butt-hurt ban evaders.
No. 89837
>>89824the infighting/derailing/nitpicking/non-contribution bans are highly inconsistent. i've even seen blatant racebait that i've reported not get banned. i get confused when i see a bunch of posts redtexted for something while there's more unbanned posts in that proximity that are sometimes way worse. occasionally it does come from an unbanned derail, too. i've come to realize the moderation is highly inconsistent and likely just depends on how the janny feels. i wish it was more consistent because it's frustrating seeing it occur in the same thread or even across multiple threads. for the longest time i genuinely wasn't sure what was truly considered breaking the rules of no infighting or nitpicking because of the way some bans are given out.
nowadays i'll see something get banned, i report something that was worse than the ban i just saw and the ban doesn't go through. it can be arguably worse or the same, but it doesn't seem to matter, it's extremely inconsistent. i also sometimes think that when there's like 10 posts in a row that are breaking rules it just becomes a shit-show and no one wants to report it anymore (i know i don't). still wish there was a vpn ban sitewide except for the hidden board, i can't stand the low-quality posts on this site and obvious bait that gets eaten up
No. 89845
File: 1738261478760.jpg (157.28 KB, 1227x905, IMG_6718~2.JPG)
At this point, anons can say whatever retarded bait they want to without getting redtexted if they justify it with manhate. Someone could say "Jews did 9/11" and get away with it as long as they added "because patriarchy" to the end. Between this and allowing VPNs, you've given baiters free reign to ruin the site.
No. 89853
>>89849kek literally, do the anons who post shit like this realise where we are?
>actually milky cow appears>shit thread! kill it! i don’t like!>>89847go post in
>>>/ot/2312101you can hide it if you don’t like it No. 89860
File: 1738310486027.gif (151.66 KB, 400x299, racewar.gif)
>>89859its a race war in there! quick jannies!
No. 89870
File: 1738315141398.jpg (18.23 KB, 521x113, 1738315045683.jpg)
Defeats the purpose of the Fetish Art thread.
No. 89879
>>89870Gore does not go anywhere on the site. Doesn't matter if it's "thread-appropriate".
>>89876How is calling a kid a minor any different than saying teen or underage? All the above means the same damn thing. Do you hear minor and think 8 year old? By law, "minor" even means under 18.
No. 89881
>>89879This is untrue and if you used any board other than /ot/, you would know this.
>How is calling a kid a minor any different than saying teen or underage?integrate
No. 89892
File: 1738335763643.gif (436.34 KB, 250x159, IMG_7316.gif)
slapfight in unpopular opinions. again.
No. 89893
>>89886So since no one knows, anon is asking to be spoonfed if anyone knows.
That click for you?
No. 89902
>>89893hey, I got my reply. two even including yours.
thnx!
No. 89931
>>89927seconding this. the
(driversperging) bans were pretty funny
No. 90007
Not the anon who posted but why is
>>>/w/343711 red texted with wrong thread. Vina is Mikan’s brand and mentioned in the OP multiple times. Would be good if jannies familiarise themselves with the OP before handing out wrong thread bans because some other newfag retard says so.
No. 90008
File: 1738510132683.jpg (446 KB, 747x871, Longlivethecow.jpg)
theres going to be a possible raid of kffaggots on ot since kf is down so can farmhands turn on vpn ban on ot?
No. 90009
File: 1738510300182.png (1.86 MB, 720x916, IMG_8047.png)
>>90008jannies, nonnies, united we stand. divided we fall.
No. 90010
File: 1738510696261.jpeg (314.24 KB, 828x893, IMG_7503.jpeg)
retarded baiting in the ugly man psyop thread. again.
No. 90014
>>90012It's because you said "pdf file" tiktoktard.
>I think using an alternative word for a creep should be okeNo, you have to integrate
No. 90015
File: 1738515070781.jpeg (651.79 KB, 1170x1100, IMG_6527.jpeg)
Are the mods retarded? This is a post about vina in her own thread. What other thread would this go in.
No. 90018
>>90017nta but maybe she’s the
elusive /w/histleblower
No. 90024
>>90023I don't think there's an endgame, she isn't as intelligent as she thinks. The motivation is probably just the perks of verbally berating and sperging at certain ips and deleting any mention of her antics/ playing
victim and pretending the accusations against her are unreasonable.
No. 90040
>>90037All the things mentioned here
>>90034 is exclusively said by straight people anon
No. 90042
>>90041One look into those communities and you'll see. Anyway I don't get why admins stopped doing these when it was done with other tumblr phrases like
triggered/
POC/
TERF/etc.
No. 90054
File: 1738544795493.jpeg (203.09 KB, 446x708, 1712005132061.jpeg)
Theyre shitting up the fandom discourse thread mods please…. PLEASE
No. 90088
File: 1738612698873.jpg (34.3 KB, 471x341, 5465476.jpg)
I would like to bring it to the staff's attention that one of the Farmhands is a notorious shitter of the Fandom Discourse thread
>>>/ot/2379390 and also a groomer who wants to 'bend' straight women into lesbianism.
The rot is coming from inside the house, not from some external boogeymen.
(ban evasion) No. 90104
>>90102>Can't post minors under 1616 is a minor. The term is "subjects" can't be posted who are under the age of 16, so 15 and younger is a no-go.
>If farmhands are going to enforce the rule that only over 18s can be posted, then they need to remove half of the threads on /w/ and /snow/.Do you mean that only people over 18 can be farmers?
No. 90120
File: 1738682674342.jpeg (377.55 KB, 828x1036, IMG_7572.jpeg)
some retard newfag trying to mke a troon thread in /g/. i don't think the dysphoria threads should be allowed even on 2x, they attract tifs and tumblrtards.
No. 90164
>>90162sounds like you got butthurt by someone hurting your feefees. this isn't reddit, you probably should go there if criticism
triggers you. i would suggest tumblr or twitter as well!
No. 90172
>>90169Disagree. Those that use OT now are not the same as those using OT years ago and it has become a cesspool of anons larping as Regina George because they think lolcow is a
edgy mean girl gossip site for femcel 4changirls!!!1! and sometimes they need to be reminded to stfu as it’s annoying.
No. 90197
File: 1738792004956.gif (197.27 KB, 275x92, IMG_5951.gif)
>>90196Nuhuh strong disagree, I look forward to this banner every board I’m on no matter how many years it’s been kek
No. 90202
>>90201i agree with you anon, her thread needs harder moderation.
speaking of moderation, what the hell is going on with this site? unsaged racebait on /snow/ for 46 minutes, yet another deranged slapfight in the "mundane shit" thread, people arguing to the death in celebricows because one anon said she liked Robert Pattinson in our current year 2025. not a ban in sight by the way
No. 90217
File: 1738830615065.jpg (347.84 KB, 680x680, 1738802449403.jpg)
can jannies please make up their mind about this picture? i've been banned before for posting it unspoilered (got the "spoiler your shit" redtext) but i keep seeing other anons do the same with no repercussions. either make "SPOILER PUKING MADOTSUKI/ELSIE DRAWING" a rule or stop making your squeamishness everyone's problem
No. 90232
>>90196Kek at some of the replies. I'm not weak enough to be
triggered by banners or something, lol. It's just they would look better if they were more in "theme" with the board. It's an aesthetic suggestion
No. 90233
>>90217that's retarded i've seen grosser/worse pictures go unreported that weren't drawings. that's just a drawing. anyways jannies have not been in top form
>>90215you can tell that's either one of those people who camp out in /meta/ looking for someone who's complaining about their bait in /ot/ or a newfag desperately trying to fit in because kek. thinking some of the banners are gross makes nobody a newfag, but acting like that does. some of the banners are straight up gross
>>90232don't even bother listening to them, you didn't even say anything crazy, they're just retarded
No. 90240
>>90237I'm not counting this year since it's just one month in. Aka I've been on since the start of 2019, maybe a bit before because I don't count. Better times back then than whatever this shit is
>>90235>zoomer of youWhile literally typing all lowercase and catty larp like a zoomer
No. 90270
>>90267Millennial but alright.
>>90269Kek
No. 90283
File: 1739015336667.png (52.93 KB, 720x473, 1000032708.png)
I'm getting the 500 internal server error when I try to post images on /m/
No. 90294
I suspect some moid self-posting on
>>>/g/445482. The sources look very sketchy.
No. 90331
File: 1739138795132.jpg (226.55 KB, 1432x1260, hypocrites.jpg)
>>89470>>89429>>89438>>89467>>89468Seems like you guys are correct and they are not even trying to hide it. This was the reason I was given for the post provided, seems like this jannie wants to dish it out but cant take it (only one infighting post got redtexted AFTER I had made a reply, this jannie goes around telling people to "kill themselves" and calls them retards but looses their shit if you say it back.)
No. 90333
>>90331So you seriously believe that every person on this IB that uses British spelling and oxford commas are in fact that moderators? And you believe that the moderators are the same ones that infight with you? You seriously believe that every anon that you infight with is actually the moderators, who are all British, and that's why you get sent to the timeout chair? And you STILL use this IB even though you believe all this?
>>90332Moids and troons (specifically TIFs) have gotten way too comfortable in the past few months. It really got bad around June 2024, that's when I noticed the sharpest decline in post quality. I've actually seen posts recently where anons encourage someone to start hormonal therapy to 'transition.' The farmhands are all too focused on the wrong things, and they aren't doing a good job with maintaining the site culture. I'm guessing that's because there's so few of them left and Cerbmin refuses to hire new ones.
No. 90335
>>90333>It really got bad around June 2024, that's when I noticed the sharpest decline in post qualityi completely agree that's exactly when i noticed a huge drop in post quality too and it hasn't been the same since. the only time it was good since then was when we had the VPN ban going, idc what anyone says there was a clear difference
>the farmhands are all too focused on the wrong things, and they aren't doing a good job with maintaining the site culture. I'm guessing that's because there's so few of them left and Cerbmin refuses to hire new ones.also agreed. some of the bans are retarded while baiters run around causing commotion on almost every board
No. 90347
>>90331youre not even trying. your ban wasnt even that long. you should have appreciated the time you were banned to lurk instead whining over stupid shit.
>>90338you seriously believe anons there every time they say that? like the anon above couldnt even admit the real reason they were banned.
No. 90360
>>90355Other than what everyone else said, farmhands also type this way
>>90316 so they'd have to ban themselves. Didn't we already debate about this a couple of years ago, and the farmhands decided not to ban it because of the reasons stated
No. 90362
>>90360yeah and there are some peope that alternate between typing styles, e. g. i only use proper punctuation and caps for long comments.
if you banned anyone who ever used lowercase you'd lose about half of the site's posters
No. 90371
>>90369Is this farmhand
>>90316 and all the other lowercase farmhands all secretly one unintegrated anon too? What about the lowercase posters from 2015?
No. 90386
>>90385an anon who types in lower case and is
toxic chill and trad who “nigel posts” and says people are jealous. the misspellings were “frase” and a completely different one i forget but you can look up on unpopular opinions from last night. they were six months apart.
No. 90392
File: 1739241384835.jpg (42.12 KB, 1110x840, FZ-kJ_0XgAEKbiK.jpg)
>>90391woah that was crazy fast. thank you jannies
No. 90394
File: 1739244531677.png (31.21 KB, 1139x439, chrome_Rg2JMAY08P.png)
>>90385>>>/ot/2389869nta but here is the start, it was very funny and schizo kek
>>>/ot/2389902if you search 'lowercase' it's clear there is one anon who has a raging hatred towards people who
dare not capitalise their sentences
No. 90412
File: 1739324394771.png (171.95 KB, 680x227, 124312537698953434325658756789…)
Why is there no boy guro thread
No. 90413
Random, but can the word ‘bald’ get a red text like
victim and
triggered kek. I think it would be funny and warranted.
>>90412There’s a thread “boys with an ouchie” or something like that in /m/. Not sure how far you’re allowed to go there.
No. 90420
>>90419I don’t think you read my entire post anon, I said that pregnancy/birth should be banned
outside of the baby talk thread. That’s not banning the topic as a whole, that’s keeping it contained, which is something we’ve done with multiple other topics prior. And, it seems like banning individual anons isn’t really doing anything, because baiters like to parrot each other. If a user makes a post about how much they hate mothers/pregnancy and it gets an extreme amount of engagement, then another retard who desires attention and has nothing better to do is going to make similar posts in the same thread, in an attempt to have their own moment of attention/interaction from nonnies. This is why the topic as a whole does need to be banned from boards that aren’t /g/, because the point we’re at is that anons bringing this topic up are not starting a conversation about “toothless single moms” out of genuine concern or care.
No. 90423
>>90420I don't think that banning any discussion of motherhood outside of a dedicated thread is a viable solution on a woman's image board. Discussion of motherhood, mothers and parenting should be allowed and this includes criticism. Where the line needs to be drawn is when the discussion devolves into moid tier insults.
I witnessed the recent infight in unpopular opinions. There's several types of schizophrenia happening in that thread and it has little to do with the subject matter itself.
>>90421NTA. Criticism is fine and should be allowed. The problem is when it goes beyond that and enters into outright misogyny and hate.
>this is an anonymous board with women onlyAnd that is exactly the issue. Why should insulting and dehumanizing a group of women be tolerated on a woman's website?
No. 90424
>>90421But why does it need to be posted about literally every single day? And if you actually wanted to have a coherent discussion about the dangers of pregnancy, wouldn’t you go to the baby talk thread instead of baiting in unpopular opinions about how people who have children should be charged $7,000 a year for doing so?
>>90423First AYRT, the problem anon is that there’s a significant difference between criticism and just being a shithead for the purpose of starting an argument. That’s kind of why I feel like pregnancy/motherhood talk is at a place where it should be contained. Because the unpopular opinions thread and Amerifags are both constantly being shit up with people who hate their mothers
No. 90439
>>90420NTAYRT but you sound stupid. Anons have been having babies and talking about babies for years. Why ban the mothers when we can just ban the baiters and infighters? If Cerbmin ever decided to actually do his job for once, the thing he signed up for, he'd just make the VPN poll already. Since the VPN ban will reduce infighting, there is no need to ban talk about babies. It is just asinine to even suggest banning baby talk.
>>90428It is just like
Groundhog Day because there really is only 6 bait topics that the baiters like to use. IDGAF when bait is unique or harmless, but for these retards they know that there is 6 topics that will ALWAYS cause an infight because some anons are just too slow-minded to report and ignore. Half the time, these baiters actually samefag and pretend to be opposed to their original bait to simulate an infight in hopes of getting anons in on it. I've seen it many times before.
No. 90445
>>90439I didn’t say it should be banned as a whole I said it should be contained and that the constant arguments about the ethics of motherhood should be banned. Also
>If cerbmin ever decided to do his job Aren’t there three admins? I thought that was what
cerb - min meant. If there’s three captains steering the ship then that’s why I feel like changes like this should be able to be made quicker
No. 90449
There's a faggot larping as a polycule slob, posting some woman's pics in Stupid Questions on /ot/, including pics of her in a bra.
>>>/ot/2396578A bunch of anons are taking the bait, of course.
No. 90454
>>90449>Some woman's picsNewfag detected.
>>90452They should change it back to /b/ and then make it hidden. The melt down would be legendary.
No. 90478
File: 1739516447144.png (9.14 KB, 1557x81, deleting it over and over.png)
>>90470this pitbull retard has posted and deleted picrel several times after being banned and the jannys are deleting its older posts too. smh. fml.
No. 90479
File: 1739545951403.jpeg (111.86 KB, 567x617, 484B1B10-01BE-4D94-8D8B-D4CB44…)
I want to be the change I see in the world. Can I please become a mod? I sent an email about it on February 9, drunk as fuck
No. 90480
File: 1739550565979.jpeg (99.33 KB, 935x572, IMG_0931.jpeg)
Can we IP ban this ban evading psycho fucking loser already?
No. 90481
>>90480>IP banThat's every single ban.
I think you mean range ban.
No. 90508
>>90505Not a redditor nor a wigi-wife but
>>90494 sounds like an idiot
>ban all discussion of a man with a dozen threads that obviously brings traffic to the site!That just isn't going to happen. Not to mention his entire case all happened recently and outside of thirstposting is a big deal in america that is
currently unfolding. I think the wigi-wives are mostly harmless and I can see the criticism of it killing /g/ in a way but you can't expect people not to be interested in something so high profile.
No. 90517
>>90508who cares about traffic? more traffic isn't a good thing if it only brings in retards.
idk about the luigi threads bc i don't frequent /g/ but imo one big factor in the revent influx of unintegrated spergs is the creation of threads for cows who have their own snark subreddits. it brings in reddit refugees who blog and nitpick all day long.
the elon and grimes threads also brought out the politispergs
No. 90522
>>90333No, why are you making up shit?
>>90347Oh fuck off with that bs. You are clearly the asshole baiting in the other thread. My point was if i'm banned for replying to a post that goes against the rule the initial post should also be redtexted, stop dodging the actual point i'm making to cover your ass.
>>90338Totally, and with jannies not doing anything about posts that start infights but just going apeshit on people who reply i'm not surprised others are thinking one of two of them are behind it.
>>90348>>90351Indeed. I'm certainly not the first one to say this and have defended the mods many times before but I see where some anons are coming from especially as this seems to be prevalent in certain threads.
No. 90553
File: 1739625516649.jpg (15.66 KB, 260x254, 1000032904.jpg)
CP on the front page.
No. 90561
>>90556>>90558>>90554Some tourist is absolutely
seething in ot lately and they're making it obvious kek. There's been some side-eye worthy posts in the unpopular opinions thread too. Sage because this isn't really a specific complaint.
No. 90569
>>90565Nobody brought up newfags until you
>>90564And it's always been a sign of non-integration
No. 90575
>>90574kek, seriously. this place has been unbelievably insufferable as of late. it feels like we're being colonized by mostly braindead retards in the last week or so. i just saw someone reply to their own unsaged post in /snow/ with "SORRY I FORGOT TO SAGE don't ban me please"
>>90573i agree with this. we need more jannies and stricter moderation for certain threads, or just overall. i agree and feel like the last 30+ or more posts in the grimes thread would benefit from post deletion, especially for repeat offenders
No. 90606
File: 1739746303326.png (23.1 KB, 624x84, spoonfeed.png)
The reason this site went to shite is because of you, you shit farmhands. Do the shit you signed up for or resign. Nobody is gonna give you a medal so if you don't like doing it, quit. You lot should be moderating this site not whistling with both thumbs up your ass.
No. 90610
>>90606yep, say it louder for the anons in the back
>>90608you clearly haven’t seen the state of lc
No. 90628
File: 1739757170763.webp (224.1 KB, 640x640, guillotine-2623353_640.webp)
>>90333>>90347Theres only one solution for paedo/nigel defenders like you…
No. 90636
>>90635I hate when anons announce that
in the thread. Like just hide the thread if it's so boring. There's literally no need to go into the thread to post how uninterested you are kek. If there are cows I'm personally not interested in, I just simply don't go to their threads.
No. 90655
File: 1739829272397.jpeg (42.38 KB, 501x613, IMG_4196.jpeg)
>>90650So cute how you care more about ban evaders and retarded infights than bothering to communicate with your own userbase
No. 90669
Moid defending himself again in the cosplay thread, making up tinfoil about Kinpatsu cheating when that's never been brought up before and won't post caps to confirm this. He even tried editing the way he posts to try to pretend it isn't him. Any time her ex is brought up it's clear it's him posting. She's been away from him for 2 years now and all the posts defending him seem to be him every time
>>>/w/344508 I even tried to find any info about this cheating anywhere online and there is nothing. He's obsessive and it's really creepy at this point that now he's making stuff up about her because he can't get over she broke up with him.
No. 90672
>>90670>>90671The infighting was more disruptive than the single image anon posted. It wasn't porn, she was talking about rendering and art style.
All you had to do was fucking ignore it. I wish you shit stirring faggots got longer bans.
No. 90675
>>90672>shit stirring faggotsSo suddenly, posting lolicon is totally okay on an imageboard that routinely tries to separate itself from chans and claims to hate our pedo counterparts? This is ridiculous
>>90670>>90671Literal lolicon fanart doesn't get banned, but being anti-loli does! This website has become a joke.
(ban evasion) No. 90695
>>90693How to get anyone banned:
>Report them on one IP>Switch IPs, then report again with different text>Repeat second step twice more>A ban will be issued, even if there are no rules brokenIt works best if you have several IPs that you use often and make it a point to defend jannies as often as possible on them.
No. 90708
>>90698>>90699I don't really care about things like that because I know how to hide threads, but if the VPN ban was ever implemented the unpopular opinions thread would be a good way to filter retards and newfags.
>>90697The people responding to her are honestly just as retarded.
No. 90713
File: 1739956626680.png (212.32 KB, 482x310, reset-the-counter.png)
>>90712I don't know what possesses anons to further shit up the thread with snarky little "ermm can't any of you READ?" posts instead of ignoring and reporting.
No. 90715
Why did I get a blogposting ban for
>>>/snow/2090495 ?
>Do not blogpost. Blogposting means sharing your personal experience, perspective, or anecdote in a way that’s not directly relevant to the discussion.How is being Jewish not as directly relevant to Nazi salutes (and what punishment someone should [not] get for making one) as possible? I also directly and glaringly address the tea, I don't think it was by any measure an off-topic reply.
No. 90724
>>90722can you explain why you just didn't leave it at
>Katchii was just being an edgy retard.why is your living in germany, your jewishness and your great grandparents name change papers are relevent to a dumb bitch being edgy online. if you really want your identity to be more relevant than it actually is, theres reddit, twitter, practically any social media platform.