[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site has moved to the new server! If you notice any issues, report them here

File: 1732658958569.gif (21.41 KB, 540x486, tumblr_4b2f949a04276cf724eec7b…)

No. 86783

No. 86784

>>86780
>goon
Can you follow her back there?

No. 86785

>>86748
I'm so tired of the underages from twitter and tiktok, they make their posts so obvious i feel like crazy seeing no one call them out on their retardation and zoomer lingo

No. 86786

>>86748
>>86785
FUCKING THIS. They’re instantly recognizable by their brain dead takes, logical fallacies, and whataboutisms when they try to argue something. Absolutely zero reading comprehension like you said. I honestly despise them and trying to have a discussion with a zoomie retard is exhausting and infuriating because their little pea brain runs itself in circles until they don’t know what’s what anymore and neither do you.

No. 86787


No. 86788

>>86785
>>86786
this is so boring. 8 years ago i was reading the same shit about my generation, only written by early millennials. you're not special because you're suddenly old enough to be making fun of the newer generation (which you're probably apart of, or close to it, i doubt you're anything older than an early gen Z or late late millennial)

No. 86789

File: 1732662638063.jpg (59.81 KB, 392x500, 3508439399_fab030ceed.jpg)


No. 86791

>>86786
theure all over /ot/, all tranny they/them threads, celebrity threads (celebricows, elon/grimes) jirai kei on /w/, the virgins arguing over their 2d porn and/husbando, theyre a cancer. they expect near constant replies like this is a chatroom for their short attention span or they whine the site is dying. they reply back with fury all triggered lso infighting as gone up.

No. 86793

>>86788
If you’ve yet to encounter one of these mind numbing mouth breathers, love that for you, but it’s definitely a problem unique to the newer generations that can hardly even read and comprehend books at a highschool level. It’s clearly a common issue on this site as of late and many of us find it frustrating. If it doesn’t apply, let it fly. I have different things to bitch about regarding my generation like the obsession with roleplay threads which bump out threads I actually care about or the framing of SW as based and liberating but that’s neither here nor there.

>t.a millennial

No. 86794

>>86788
other gen-z hate zoomers just as much, which is a new thing. zoomers aren't any gen-z they are the intolerable ones.

No. 86795

>>86754
Being one of the first posters to even shine the light on some of these girls lolicon tendencies with actual proof of actual lolicon merch they owned, I feel pointing at every single moe item they own and calling it lolicon just waters down anyone flagging the genuine lolicon shit as another baseless accusation made by a screaming harpy. As soon as you ask they validate their claim as to why they feel it’s lolicon, you are dog piled and accused of being a gooning coomer whose brain is fried from all the loli porn you own kek.

No. 86800

Could mods delete the irrelevant posts from the doodle board thread so anons can actually see the links to the boards and not some goofy back and forth, please and thank you?

No. 86801

>>86795
Not to mention these users on both the fashion and jirai kei threads are unintegrated as hell. Here is one poster >>>/w/339469 shitposting about what anons are saying in the fashion thread regarding the supposed "lolicon" images and bringing that sarcasm over to the JK thread. So not only are they watering down terms and infighting about it by saying everything that exists is lolicon (to the point that wearing pastels as an adult with pigtails, even without editing, is lolicon coded) that these girls do.

No. 86802

>>86801
Definitions have changed, apparently. Lolicon and pedopandering don't exist because terminally online twitards have been desensitized and decided it's justified because Japanese=good, and it works as a fine cope against their deathly fear of aging. How else are they going to bolster their chances to snag a marriage visa from a creepy Japanese moid and live out their days in perpetual arrested development as an influencer that offers absolutely nothing of value to the world at large? Good job twisting their words and gaslighting to make it seem like it's completely normal to have wall tapestries of little girls in seductive poses, but anyone with a functioning sense of reasoning can see for themselves no matter how you try to spin it.

No. 86803

>>86802
And yet who got banned?

No. 86804

I genuinely think that yuricoomer cringe thread going down was a psyop because it took the spamming of tranny yuri fetishists to get it taken down. Why not just ban the spammer? Why take down the entire thread? The actual solution seemed clear cut and dry, it just feels an excuse. 4chan jannies on blue boards handle pornspamming better than this, if they didn't then it would defeat the point of a blue board. Same premise, it's punishing many for the crimes of two people at most.

No. 86805

File: 1732683411136.jpg (83.66 KB, 750x537, 35411245.jpg)

>>86773
>she doesn't remember the husbando wars of 2023

No. 86806

>>86804
a yuri cringe thread still exists, it's on the media /m/ board here. You can go and post there, plus it's more chill and there are no yuripedos to spam that thread.

No. 86807

File: 1732686337401.png (204.05 KB, 665x433, xxxzcxzc.png)

Yuripedo spamming the yuri fandom crazies thread, she cannot help but avatarfag as one of her loli waifus everytime she shows up. Please begging farmhands to redtext her sperging instead of deleting it this time, it's funnier.

No. 86808

>>86803
nta but no matter how hard you deny it pedoshit is still pedoshit
>>86773
>pretending like threads don’t get derailed by anons calling someones husbando ugly
most of the fujo-related derails I’ve seen are because of some nonas hateboner for fujos

No. 86809

>>86804
Fujocoomer used to have actual milk in the past, but nowadays the thread is just vendetta screencaps of LC posts and tifs (seriously why do the tif fujos need to have a separate thread whereas tim himedanshis cant; not all tifs are fujos in the same way not all TIMs consume yuri and are hsts)
honestly having a fujocoomer cringe thread only emboldens nonas into being more malicious against women who happen to be fujoshi instead of disliking the content itself. Its not even about hating yaoi at this point anymore, its all about finding a moral high ground to look down on other women for being "moid centric"

No. 86812

File: 1732690454080.jpg (Spoiler Image,179.18 KB, 1170x1449, 1732648663997.jpg)

>>86801
>everything that exists is lolicon
No one said that, and you're conflating and twisting several arguments. The idol duo referenced in the thread styles and shoops themselves to look extra underage, whereas in a normal photo they look like 20 year old women and not uguu babies. Liking them wouldn't make someone pedo but it's not exactly a secret that jirais infantilize the hell out of themselves. Secondly, I guess we can keep ignoring the whole right side of picrel.(dragging infight to /meta/)

No. 86813

>>86804
Sounds like farmhands just got tired of babysitting retards and decided to nuke the thread instead. Not to mention that it was obvious fujos just made it as a vendetta thread to get back at yurifag anons, egging the infight even more. They haven't banned the yuri cringe thread on /m/ and anyone is free to post there so I don't know why fujosharts are still seething about this after a week still.

No. 86815

>>86812
this wasn’t the example that was used faggot. If it was there wouldn’t have been any argument. It had already been pointed out before that this person owned loli shit and there was no infighting over it because it was blatantly lolis. The point is anons keep posting any old shit of an anime girl with big boobs and pastel colors and going “omg a loli!” which is completely watering down the actual loli merch they own because now anyone reading would think it’s only about pastel colors and anime girls with uguu faces that makes them a lolicon and not the jojifuku girl wrapped in a jump rope that looks like an elementary school age child in bondage which is an issue. Then it ends up derailed on to moral fagging about Japanese men and Japanese Culture across 2 whole threads simultaneously like anyone with access to the internet wouldn’t already know the entirety of Japanese men are coombrained degenerates

No. 86816

>>86787
What am I meant to be seeing?

No. 86817

shouldnt the Yuri fandom crazies thread be moved to ot? Fandom Discourse and Fujocoomer cringe are also there because it's more so about the cows in the fandom itself then actually the media. I feel like /m/ should be one of the boards that doesn't involve that much gossip stuff about the people in the fandoms itself.

No. 86818

>>86817
It should, but the livestock owners of this site will never do it.

No. 86819

>>86815
It's the same wall at a different angle. You seem not to understand context. Let's be generous and say 4 out of 5 are just moe art. The artist in question has apparently drawn extreme loli art before, but because this time he added breasts to the same childlike proportions (in reference to the catgirl in white lingerie), it doesn't count anymore apparently? It seems that only art depicting minors up until middle school counts as loli to you although a man lusting after highschool girls still gets called a lolicon in Japan. Most normal people seeing that would still think it's creepy. Again, there's context. Having that art on the same wall shows a theme. She may not be a direct pedo or a lolicon but by proudly displaying that art she shows she's okay with it and likely self inserts through it like a lot of girls do these days but that's more of a complex subject so i'll spare you and myself the headache of drawing this out longer.(dragging infight to /meta/)

No. 86822

>>86812
This also is majority big tits moe girls. Come back with real pedo proof, newfag.

No. 86824

>>86822
Newfags are the ones considering this normal because not too long ago this would get you seriously side eyed and shamed for having the same taste as the average weebo pedomoid who loves his 1000 year old loli vampires but go off I guess.

No. 86825

File: 1732726934729.png (728.76 KB, 818x1022, hi-cow.png)

This post didn't suggest that the OP was Dana. It was pointing out that Dana was lurking that thread. Why did it get a "hi cow" ban?

No. 86826

File: 1732727921220.png (595.34 KB, 1152x1120, addressing-a-cow.png)

>>86825
Same fag. See all these other posts that mention Dana by name? Those aren't "hi cow posts," they weren't banned, and they shouldn't be. It makes no sense why that one was singled out.

No. 86827

>>86824
"Not too long ago" moids were allowed to post on lolcow (see the bottom of the /ot/ catalog). The site has never been moralfag land.

No. 86828

>>86827
It's not your safespace either. Some of us over the age of 25 weren't groomed by early exposure to coomshit in their fandom circles.

No. 86829

spoiler thread pic for Politician cringe thread on ot. There needs to be some rules and limits over what can be the thread pic, i don't want to see literal fetish content. Also i can't hide the thread if im browsing catalog. Either make it so you can hide threads while browsing catalog or make rules as to what how explicit a thread pic can be.

No. 86830

File: 1732730267105.png (143.82 KB, 524x343, Screen Shot 2024-11-27 at 12.5…)

>Suggestion
When there is a raid that happens, jannies should go through threads and check for stuff like picrel. This is the 5th time I've gone into a thread and seen nearly month old spam posts from a failed raid. I report them and they're deleted, but I really shouldn't have to report them to begin with. When there is a raid doesn't it make sense that farmhands should manually check threads to make sure to delete any spam posts? It makes staff seem lazy.

No. 86831

>>86824
If you was that much of an oldfag by now you would consider having coomer animu uguu waifu posters as lowtier milk. It’s not normal but in comparison to everything else they are doing it’s hardly milk to constantly sperg about in multiple threads on and on so unclutch your pearls whining about gen xyzqwerty faggotry you nasolabial fold having hag(infighting )

No. 86832

Someone needs to put a stop to janny newfaggotry, modding when you don't know basic terminology and messing up your bans and redtexts is embarrassing and retarded. Either go back or read up on site terminology here on meta. Also, stop making it so obvious when you get involved in infights.

No. 86833

>>86832
It's part of their plan to kill the site.

No. 86834

>>86831
>nasolabial fold having hag for not being an autopedo loser deathly afraid of aging and self inserting through moidtier coombait
Please. Go outside and touch some grass and stop being terminally online for a bit. That doesn't erase the loli posters right next to the just-moe-coombait on the walls. But keep astroturfing and hang whatever you want on your walls, I'm really done caring about this dead horse.

No. 86835

>>86824
Stfu lolifag. You're obsessed and you know very well its because of simple, non-loli coded things as well. Youve derailed two threads and now meta over this.(dragging infight to /meta/)

No. 86836

Maybe I’m just weird but the last 5-6 replies in the shay thread seem like a Samefagging robot kek.

No. 86839

>>86838
It was down for 4 hours

No. 86840

>>86839
Yes, which is over 3hs

No. 86841

>>86840
Sigh. Saying "over 3 hours" instead of rounding to the closest relevant time marker makes it sound like the event was shorter than it was.

No. 86842

the host seems to have technical issues every few months, idk much about internet stuff but is that normal?

No. 86843

>>86842
It's normal for image boards.

No. 86844

File: 1732762042468.jpg (81.86 KB, 925x338, 1000008309.jpg)

I hate the kid's on /w/

No. 86845

please do something about the autopedophile banning anyone who points out lolicon in /w/

No. 86848

>>86822
moeshit is pedophilic. also everyone going >b-but lolis don’t have boobs just be grateful that you haven’t heard of oppai loli

No. 86849

>>86822
It’s actually closer to 50% anon…

No. 86850

Honest question when does a personalityfag become a lolcow? Isnt finding out a anonymous ticks name and face and their accounts having milk defines them as cows? Haven't there been past lolcows who were personalityfags before?

No. 86852

>>86845
>>86848
>>86849
Need a farmhand to say if any of these posters is a samefag lol The pedofags who keep derailing need to be caged.

No. 86853

File: 1732790701799.jpeg (206.96 KB, 749x1458, IMG_4436.jpeg)

Is this thread a vendetta? I know its old but a still active instagram account has it linked in its bio for no reason and i thought it was weird, plus it's definitely attracting newfags and scrotes.
>>>/snow/1371005

No. 86854

>>86853
Oh that's really weird

No. 86855

>>86853
As far as i can tell, the account just post outdated memes about working in airlines. The lolcow link is so random kek.

No. 86856

>>86852
considering I have noticed most of the comments always happen in quick succession 2 minutes apart then nothing at all for hours, then several comments again 2 minutes apart in both /w/ and /meta/ I would say someone has been samefagging for the cause for quite a while

No. 86857

>>86856
Samefagging and they reply like they are using discord or comment sections from youtube/twitter/tiktok.

No. 86858

>>86857
Kek are you agreeing with me or you trying to pretend I’m also samefagging?

No. 86859

>>86858
Lol, sorry. I'm agreeing that they samefag considering how fast it goes. At least double posting.

No. 86860

>>86841
the site is back up were you literally counting the hours instead of doing something else. weird ass nitpick
>>86842
imageboards do not have the infrastructure of social media platforms run by Big Tech.

No. 86861

Do farmhands ignore the unpopular opinions thread now? I'm catching up to the thread and reading a 100 post derail from a day ago with no bans/redtext in sight.

No. 86864

File: 1732804822249.png (189.12 KB, 1080x500, image.png)

how is this bait when all of the things that anon listed is factual and a contribution to the discussion

No. 86865

>>86860
The hell? I saw on the status page that lolcow was down for 4 hours, and when I went to meta to see if they said anything else about the downtime, I found it strange that they said it was 3 hours. All I said was that it was 4 hours. No need to project your lolcow usage onto others.

No. 86866

>>86864
And what thread was this in?

No. 86867

can farmhands ban the fujo infighter already in the yuri fandom crazies thread already?

No. 86868

>>86864
if not bait then just mental retardation

No. 86869

>>86852
not a samefag. also “””“pedofag””” are you trying to accuse the anons calling out pedoshit of being pedos themselves?

No. 86872

can you ban yurifags from the yuri crazies thread? they shit up the thread to defend their pedo discord mommy and are incapable of taking criticism. I dont know why they think its a thread for yurifags when the thread was started to make fun of them.

No. 86873

>>86872
>t. the fujolard that got assmad after anons and mods told her to stop infighting

No. 86874

>>86873
See? this is how they act. Childish pathetic behaviour.

No. 86875

>>86874
>anyone I don't like is a yuri/yumefag
Typical fujo persecution complex

No. 86876

>>86875
i never even claimed to be a fujo lol you are just schizo

No. 86877

>>86872
how would that rule even be enforced? If you mean yuri WKs sure they can just hide the thread if they dont like it but you can't ban himejos from the yuricoomer thread when theyre the ones providing most of the insider milk kek

No. 86878

>>86877
ban wks and yurifags outting themselves, simple as. Also its not true that most posts are ''insider milk'' i posted like half the milk on the thread and i am not a hime, i just lurk /a/ too much.

No. 86879

>>86878
Sure why not, just dont be so sharp with your words lest it turns into another vendetta thread and it gets closed. We can be civil about pointing out infighters who are clearly instigating a fight in order to intentionally close the thread. Just sit back and let the milk come in and report WKs, you dont have to reply a snarky comeback in order to prove your point.

No. 86880

There are so many retards in the Shay thread blogging about showing their family and moids the hog

No. 86881

File: 1732839012582.jpg (47.91 KB, 536x470, 1000029319.jpg)

>>86880
Why?!

No. 86882

>>86878
>wks and yurifags
And? Where are these wks and yurifags? It's obvious you just want another fandom discourse thread for your fujo circlejerk where you can post your retarded twitter slapfight screenshots from literal 16 year olds. There is a reason why mods kept the thread on /m/ and never moved it to /ot/

No. 86883

>>86882
not exactly a wk/yurifag but nonas saying they want to fuck yuripedo or find her attractive is getting redundant and encouraging the personalityfag. if you have to confess this take it to /g/

No. 86884

Infestation of blogging in the shay thread

No. 86886

Fujosperg derailing and infighting in gender ideology hate thread

No. 86889

farmhands confirmed to be autopedophiles.

No. 86890

Moid in ugly man psyops calling us eugenists, sperging about Jews kek

No. 86892

>>86886
Pretty sure it's one anon that is sperging about fujos across multiple threads.

No. 86894

>>86892
Fujos started the infight by getting offended when nonnas said yaoi objectively is the reason many TIFs troon out, though

No. 86895

>>86894
why are fujos always escaping their containment thread

No. 86897

>>86894
A fujo randomly said the only manga genre that should come out of Japan is yaoi, that was the first post about yaoi in the thread, it was so unwarranted. Then they acted like it was actually the antifujos who started it

No. 86898

>>86894
>nonnas said yaoi objectively is the reason many TIFs troon out
This is starting an infight, the thread was also talking about a ftm that posted a manga about she was struggling mentally after getting sexually assaulted so it was frankly a pretty retarded take to have, that bl was objectively the reason.

No. 86899

>>86890
He's still going. You're not beating the trannyjanny allegations any time soon.
>>86897
Oh my god, will you quit wking/victimizing yourself? An anon replied something like "good luck on your transition" which delved into a whole spergout from fujos. Learn2ignore instead of seething, you already know gender ideology hate thread isn't fujo general.

No. 86900

>>86894
If you read the comic detailing the author getting sexually assaulted by men and arrived to the conclusion that yaoi was why she trooned out, you have brainworms.

No. 86901

>>86897
It was an offhand reply to a post about a shounen mangaka being convicted of pedophilia. Frankly, it should've just been ignored.

No. 86902

>>86898
>Staring the truth is starting an infighting.
You're too sensitive for this website and especially gender critical threads. Stick to your fujo containment ones if you're this easily triggered because fujos themselves admit most of them transitioned due to yaoi. The manga author isn't a TIF, she's non-binary, and she's addicted to gay porn by her own admission so it was a relevant conversation. Nobody denied the fact that the sexual harassment she experienced was the main reason in her case, either

No. 86903

>>86900
That wasn't my conclusion nor how the infight actually started, we had moved way past her manga atp.
>>86901
But you can't ignore the objectively true observation that there's a fujoshi to TIF pipeline? No, you always have to victimize yourselves and derail every thread defending your sodomite porn

No. 86904

>>86902
>You're too sensitive for this website
Says the anon that couldn't let someone replying to a pedo post pass up kek. Maybe you should stick to the antifujo containment thread if you don't want people calling you out for blaming a woman's mental breakdown on gay porn rather than nearly getting raped in a shower.

No. 86905

>>86899
>Learn2ignore instead of seething
I did ignore it, but the same thing could be said about the fujos who replied and kept infighting even when other posts were less insulting and more objective

No. 86906

>>86905
"Good luck on your transition" and projecting how others are going to trans out is not ignoring, please learn to have some self awareness.

No. 86907

>>86904
>Says the anon that couldn't let someone replying to a pedo post pass up kek.
Huh? I don't know who you're confusing me with but I don't care enough about you retards to post in a thread about it, in fact I'd like to stop hearing from you at all.
>>86905
Yeah… that's what I'm saying. All fujospeds should've ignored it. Is everyone ITT retarded except me?
>>86906
She really made you seethe, huh? Cope kek %99 of TIFs themselves admit yaoi made them troon out.

No. 86908

The fujo obsessed retard keeps shitting up unrelated threads on /m/. Please start banning that fucker because it feels like every damn thread gets derailed by her.

>>86894
Shut up and stop lying, no one is buying your schizo ramblings and samefagging anymore. Fujos rarely go out of containment, instead it's you who brings tif/tranny and yaoi talk into every fucking thread, even ones that are completely unrelated. Go back to kiwifarms, seriously.

No. 86910

>>86906
I'm not the one who posted that. Most of us ignored the yaoi shilling post except for that one autist, I'm saying that the fujos who kept replying to that bait should listen to your own advice and ignore clearly inflammatory posts and report them instead
>>86908
It's both actually, this may surprise you but there are infighting spergs from both sides, and both of them claim the farmhands are persecuting them (they may even be the same person idk). Both should be banned

No. 86911

kpop in ugly man psyop thread again

No. 86912

/pol/tard in the vent thread

No. 86913

>>86910
Sydney "whiteknight" who is definitely not her has returned to the JC thread once again

No. 86914

Personalityfag derailing /ot/

No. 86915

>>86914
Which thread?

No. 86916

Super retarded infighting happening in the ugly man psyop thread

No. 86917

baiting tradfag in amerifag thread

No. 86919

This is 100% the moid that Kinpatsu stopped dating. This is Eric. He's been defending himself in the cosplay thread for over a week now. You can tell it's a moid because he's calling the new guy out and suddenly between the "Why do we need to choose who is worse?" he defends Eric, the ex non-stop, while calling his ex mid. I have never, ever seen a farmer who is a female call a woman 'mid'. This is a very moid-centered way of talking about women and the whole paragraph is clearly him trying to defend himself and shit on his ex girlfriend and her new boyfriend.

>>>/w/339584 I think most anons already knew he was posting about himself in the thread previously. Makes sense why it's a massive wall of text because he got banned for not integrating before. He's learning, but he's so obviously Eric. Also not posting proof of any of these claims that Kinpatsu is mentally unable to care for herself to the degree of a 13 year old girl? What fucking shitpost crap is that? You can't tell me that's not a salty male behind those words.

No. 86920

I think the attractive male photo dumps in the ugly man psyop are better suited in the ideal man bodies thread. It doesnt really add to the discussion of ugly men being shilled as attractive imo

No. 86922

>>86783
ban evading antiabortion tradthot or moid in amerifag at it again

No. 86923

>>86922
Other anon here and seconded on that, there is a scrote in the americafag thread roleplaying as a elderly woman and shitting up the whole.

No. 86924

>>86923
would not be surprised if it was actually some retarded old woman because lolcow gets posted alot on xitter and sites like ovarit because it's female only

No. 86926

>>86895
because it’s not a containment?

No. 86927

>>>/m/434062
never ban anyone in the pokemon thread again if you farmhands allow an entire thread to be taken over by this "yuripedo" person

No. 86928

tranny in the stupid questions thread in ot

No. 86929

The moid in cosplay is flying off the handle because no one gives AF about their Kinpatsu tirade about tattoos. Really weak milk to assume fetishes from people because they don't have any other milk. Very clear they aren't happy anons aren't agreeing with them.
>>>/w/339628

No. 86931

>>86929
Just to add, I don't know why her new boyfriend is being brought up anyway either. He doesn't cosplay and he's unrelated to her milk which is anons making fun of her bad editing for onlyfans content. The reason it comes off as the jealous ex-boyfriend is because the new boyfriend, Nate, is constantly being brought up and jabbed at. The rules about involving people who aren't the cow are constantly broken with this user and the tinfoiling about the tattoo fetish is a really bad attempt at making him relevant or milky. None of which it is. It's been going on for over a week now that Nate keep being brought up when there's no milk or cosplay related content about him being posted.

No. 86932

The infight is still ongoing in the ugly man pysop thread. People are insulting eachother for having different types.

No. 86933

There's been a massive influx of newfags over the past few days and they're shitting up every thread they come across. Please bring back hellweek, this is getting unbearable

No. 86934

>>86933
The hellweek earlier this year, probably the strongest/strictest one ever, didn't do shit. There needs to be a new method.

No. 86935

>>86934
Well we already all know the method: ban VPNs. So far afaik two threads had a VPN ban in the last 2-4 weeks, and it worked wonders for those threads.

No. 86936

ayrt, I saw an anon mention potentially scrubbing lolcow from google search results and that might quell some of it but the problem is a lot of these cows deserve to be one click away from all their craziness being on display. It's frustrating because you're right, the last hell week really didn't work. It really feels like there's no solution here and it sucks

No. 86937

>>86935
If a full scale VPN ban is what it takes to clean up this place it needs to be implemented

No. 86938

>>86937
Nta but imo it should only be applied to the cow boards, /ot/, and the hidden board

No. 86939

>>86938
who will post on the cow boards without a vpn?

No. 86940

>>86939
They could at least try it temporarily. A lot of these newfags are hypersensitive to rejection and it probably wouldn't take more than one ban and getting locked out permanently to drive them away

No. 86941

there is a generation alpha hate thread on /ot/ and that generation is literally under the age of 14 right now. what is happening to this site?

No. 86942

>>86941
Zoomers. And I don't mean Gen Z as a whole, some of them are as old as 27. Teens and early 20s retards are pouring in here and refusing to integrate.

No. 86943

Ban evader in cosplay thread still.please put the moid out of his misery.

No. 86944

>>86939
I will

No. 86945

whoever hired those new ot farmhands put them to pasture already they fucking suck ass, obvious tranny/racebait posts stay longer than needed and personalityfags are allowed to roam free.

No. 86946

please stop ignoring my reports of endless derailing in radfems thread

No. 86948

Can we ban the sperg going off on “women” about abortion? I just scrolled through like two days of derailing pro life garbage.

No. 86949

>>86948
just curious but what thread?

No. 86950

Why have the farmhands labelled dorians ana pics fishing thread as a shit thread but not locked it? Shes already discussed in the alt cows thread and its clear the thread wasnt set up to discuss her, strange decision by farmhands.

No. 86952

newfags posting Jill's mom and her facebook account and links to her brother's youtube. Why do farmers do the most retarded shit lately? >>>/w/339698

No. 86953

>>86948
if you're referring to the discussions about abortion in the amerifags thread, laws surrounding abortion and american citizens personal feelings on them are a really popular topic on /ot/, and it has been for many years. so long as anons are speaking in a civil manner and communicating reasonably, it does not go against any /ot/ rules to discuss abortion with differing opinions. i did notice a few bans were handed out last night during the previous infight, and i notice the conversation reawakened within the last few hours which insinuates that any bans likely expired by now.

No. 86954

>>86950
They've been choosing to keep a lot of bad snow threads unlocked for some reason

No. 86955

>>86945
it feels like the mods have been asleep for a while or have simply given up

No. 86956

>>86948
God, yes. They post circular arguments so people will respond, they sleep for 6-8 hours, and then come back and do the same thing.

No. 86959

Jannies there are two 139 MTF threads and they are both open pls lock one of them thnx.

No. 86961

>>86783
CP(?) on front page

No. 86963

Discordfags reappeared in the dead venus thread

No. 86966

Love the snowflakes

No. 86967

racebaiter in amerifag thread

No. 86968

Those snowflakes are slowing down my browser, thanks a lot. Every day are the poorfags oppressed because we couldn’t suck off a crack addict for PC parts

No. 86969

>>86968
chill retard lmao

No. 86970

>>86968
You can press the big snowflake to make it disappear

No. 86971

Why are /ot/ jannies so lazy and retarded?? kick this retard out already, they're not even moderating. I'm tired of reporting posts only for them to never get redtexted, and in the rare chance they do, it's 48 hours later.
And I'm not forgetting when you let a baiting moid sperg about how we were all licherally nazi eugenics for not wanting to breed with ugly moids shit up ugly man psyops for DAYS, and the scrote literally never got banned. He announced his leave all on his own on LC graduation party saying we made him mald too hard with the transphobia and misandry. Thanks for nothing, trannyjannies, guess we don't need you to put moids out to pasture after all.

No. 86972

Ember Whann is writing ChatGPT odes to herself in /snow/ >>>/snow/2063807 >>>/snow/2063797

No. 86973

>>86963
Lol they are samefagging, posting tinfoil, and moralfagging themselves

No. 86974

File: 1733127963444.jpeg (17.86 KB, 678x452, Grinchy nona.jpeg)

>>86968
>t.
But really, as a poorfag to another poorfag the solution is easy and also yearly so why aren't you used to this?

No. 86976

Fujohater is escaping containment once again in tropes thread in /m/, going off about pseudo males or whatever her fetish is.

No. 86977

Consider locking the Venus Nagelic thread. Its only her discordfags in there defending themselves and posting non-venus screencaps of random accounts repeatedly

No. 86978

Sorry if what I posted is too much but there was a good intent

No. 86979

File: 1733165564023.gif (38.51 KB, 169x169, 1000003290.gif)

it would be kind of cool to have a meta thread dedicated to listing/sharing new threads.
it would make it easier for nonas to point each other in the right direction when finding a topic and would give new threads some more traction.

No. 86980

File: 1733166193787.png (50.58 KB, 1816x382, locking warning.png)

for the last 4 jill threads, newfags have been replying after the 1200 post locking warning and the new thread isnt able to be linked as a reply

i understand it's not enforceable, but fwiw would it ever be possible for the warning language to be changed slightly so they know not to comment?

No. 86981

>>86980
yes please, this annoys me so much

No. 86982

>>86979
Just use the catalog and the search function.

No. 86983

>>86980
So??? Just make a new thread. You can at least leave the old thread link in the new OP. This isn't something that's an issue, threads are allowed to be maxed. This is some really nitpicky shit and Ive been using lolcow for like 10 years.

No. 86984

>>86980
It's actually the job of the person making the new thread to post the link before the thread is maxed out.

No. 86985

>>86983
the warning itself says to post a link to the new thread so thats why i asked
>>86984
i agree, i think the issue is jills thread specifically seems to have an overwhelming amount of newfags since the DID saga. since we recap thread highlights in the new thread description, it can take a bit and seems like the threadnonas cant get the threads made before its maxed

No. 86986

All day,

I've been seeing people type out posts,

like this, hitting enter after nearly every sentence.

Is typing like this okay now?

I always thought it was a sign

of non-integration?

No. 86987

>>86986
beautiful poem, nona

No. 86988

>>86982
i'm not saying i'm looking for a thread, i can find threads just fine. i just saw a new thread that seemed useful and some nonas might not realize they wanted a thread unless they saw it. like a "i didn't know i needed this, but i do" type thing

No. 86989

>>86987
Thanks. From now on, I'm gonna hit enter after every sentence since integration isn't important anymore. Watch the jannies ban me for it! In the appeal I'll link to all the posts I reported for it that weren't banned.

No. 86990

infighting and moralfagging about fujos jn the stupid questiins thread.
pls just ban antifujo retards at this point. they simply can't keep it in their containment thread.

No. 86991

>>86990
Kek of course you speshul snowflakes are immediately running to the jannies to cry about it

No. 86992

Please delete discordfag posts in venus thread

No. 86993

Laur Trueman on the loose in Lillee Jean's thread again

No. 86994

personalityfag in fandom discourse thread

No. 86995

cp in bad art thread

No. 86996

Vain bitching happening in GIOYC, I reported the posts.

No. 86997

>>86994
since theyre still up… can you please delete personalityfag posts instead of slapping a witty redtext on them? they want the special mod treatment and can easily evade the ban anyways, so the only way to get rid of them is to nip them by the bud and remove their means of getting any attention.

No. 86998

yuripedo still ban evading in the fandom discourse thread. Please bring back the vpn ban in the fandom discourse thread.

No. 86999

>>86994
>>86998
I really dont want to be a minimod but holy shit this is a new low for nonnie retardation. Im assuming mods are asleep and cant do immediate action but holy fuck can they not see the blatant personalityfag in front of them and learn to disengage and report for just a couple minutes? Are they that desperate to post a witty comeback as an "own" to someone intentionally fishing for bait?? these shitty newfags are a plague on this site, and they're clearly showing their zoomer tendency to dramaseek and attentionwhore.
If VPN bans aren't going to be enforced, they should at least do a 1-2 minute cooldown between posts so nonas can actually contemplate about hitting send instead of rapid firing shitposts made during the heat of the moment.

No. 87000

>>86999
>Im assuming mods are asleep
When aren't they? Every day it's the same routine, spend an 2-3 hours online responding to reports, then close the tab and disappear for 16-21 hours.

No. 87001

>>86999
>>87000
Jesus go touch grass. I'd be more worried if they were completely unresponsive on cow boards or left cp up for hours on end

No. 87004

>>87001
thanks for admitting that you are a newfag but the reason why there is less child abuse material on lolcow now has nothing to do with the moderation and has more to do with the tech team who implemented a software here to catch those types of images that majority of the time here got spammed by bots.
Before that got implemented some of those images would stay up here for hours until a mod would check up on the reports.

No. 87005

>>87001
Have you not seen the recent complaints of unintegrated tourists shitting up cow threads dragging their regina george persona along over to snow and post constant unsaged nitpicks or non-milk. They culled dumbass shit because it promoted this behaviour onto cow threads, why can't we point out this pattern happening again?

No. 87006

>>87005
It's kinda their fault for allowing twitter-esque topics like fandom discourse thread to be on this site, which of course attracts twitterfags

No. 87007

There has been an uptick of people going absolutely wild on pedophilia accusations. Whether it's about 2D characters or how some anons only accept the sperm of 18-23 year old 3DPD men, these "pedo hunters" are quick to call them everything under the sun, shaming, screeching, and all but sending tips to the FBI over some anon talking how much she wants to get fucked by some anime character still in high school.

No. 87008

>>87006
i know you're one of those retards who wants to nuke the activity of this site or only allow cow boards but you have to realise that cow culture is dying, no one gives a fuck about any of the cows in snow, pt or w anymore. Only like 4 threads out of the whole cow boards are active and 2 of them are about troons.

No. 87009

File: 1733198786721.png (581.98 KB, 1200x962, 461783483218487.png)

>>86997
….and they redtext a single post and left the other posts unaccounted for the night. do mods not know that having a unique redtext for personalityfags is giving them the attention they seek by having their alias kept up and known?

No. 87012

>>87009
That's a troll twitter. Are you serious?

>>86985
Its never been that deep. Ive never seen anyone banned or complaints for that matter, over this. You sound like a newfag who's latched onto Jill on this site.

No. 87013

>>87008
nta but if fandom discourse infighting is the only thing keeping you here, then you all really need your own separate board or website to congregate together elsewhere and stop shitting up other threads with your faggotry. You contribute nothing essentially.

No. 87014

Is this anons admitting to not caring if Taylor has milk or not and instead just posting tinfoils to use the thread as some sort of archive? >>>/w/339874

No. 87015

>>87012
nona…. it’s a meme

No. 87016

>>86977
Don't respond to them if they're derailing the thread, report and move on, it's not that hard.
Venus is a legacy cow, even if she's milkless these days there's no way her thread would be lock.

No. 87017

>>87007
This. I know other nonas wanted that yuri cringe thread, but some of the worst offenders of this are in that thread and the creation of that thread was a bad idea in the first place. Most of that thread is just derailing complaining about lolis and discussing personalityfags.

No. 87018

>>87017
they keep shitting up the tropes thread too (like calling an anon pedo for finding a character funny? and one for discussing a character's personality, and too many other examples)

No. 87019

I suggest unsaging dumbass shit.

No. 87020

>>87017
>M-muh yuri cringe thread please delete it
The fujocoomer thread has a staunch tradition of accusing fujos and aidens of being pedophiles spanning for literal years, that's literally Paki-chan's modus operandi as well.

No. 87021

>>87020
She's talking about the old Yuri cringe thread made by fujoshits who just created it as a vendetta thread against a single personalityfag. It got locked because it was obvious they just wanted a thread to extend their retarded infight.

No. 87023

Unintegrated posting, obvious male (deleted bc mistake)
>>>/g/448120
>>>/g/447291

No. 87024

maybe all the ot threads that bring newfags going full retard should be sage'd.

No. 87025

>>87024
I second something needs to happen with /ot. Now there’s a nazi sperg. Feels sus.

No. 87026

When will Kinpatsu/spookykins be getting her own thread?

No. 87027

Bj chan baiting in unpopular opinions for literal hours

No. 87028

>>87027
Not just unpopular opinions, someone is really off her bippie meds today. Every second thread has weird over-the-top hostile replies.

No. 87029

hey the unpopular opinions thread is filled with racebait, pol-sperging and bj-chan getting out of her containment thread.

Please add a vpn ban on the unpopular opinions thread, i don't know why you keep on ignoring us and our pleads. A vpn ban on threads that attract bait would help curb down on the bait so much.

I don't know why you keep ignoring the userbase, not only has the moderation become slow these past three days but you keep ignoring anons that are fucking BEGGING you to add a vpn ban because the threads are unusable. Totally ignoring the whole userbase.

No. 87030

>>87028
yeah the site is unusable today, it's not worth looking at any thread. Sometimes i feel like there is someone in the LC team trying to purposely let this site go to shit.

No. 87031

>>87030
Just today? LC has been unmoderated for weeks, I'm hoping this is just for the holidays and they'll get back on track but some of these jannies need to get the boot.

No. 87032

>>87031
they just need to implement a permanent vpn ban in the america, unpopular opinions and fandom thread.

Also the vpn ban has been proven to work since the america and fandom threads were normal when they were under the vpn ban. I don't know why mods won't implement something that has been proven to work and be effective at curbing bait.

No. 87033

>>87021
obviously she’s not

No. 87034

>>87031
Just weeks? It started to get really bad in late July.

No. 87037

>>87026
I want the ex boyfriend posts reveal. He's making it so clear it's him. He can't integrate and can't stand anons pointing out who he is. It's resulted in a reverse-uno "No, YOU'RE the cow" accusations when he's been wrong over and over. Eric keeps mentioning fetishes and how Nate took advantage of her and is forcing her to be a "sex doll". Really gross descriptions from a jealous male. An isolated thread for all this would be fantastic.

No. 87038

>>87032
mods would never listen to retards like you because they know site-wide vpn ban would kill this entire imageboard. everyone would migrate elsewhere and all that would be left is you and a handful of others dying to be left alone in an echochamber.(ban evading baiter)

No. 87039

>>87038
>13% of posts made in a 2 week period were made through a VPN.
>But if we ban VPNs, the entire imageboard would die.
You're so smelly go wash your ass please

No. 87040

>>87039
>implying people weren't constraining themselves more often than usual
give it a proper test, month or two and you'll see how dead the site is then you stupid monkey.(ban evading baiter)

No. 87041

Thank you for deleting personalityfag posts!

No. 87042

>>87038
why do you people always whine about "killing" the site?

No. 87043

>>87038
nowhere did i even mention a sitewide vpn ban, i just said certain threads. You lack reading comprehension and sound like a defensive baiter, probably one of the ban evading ones who doesn't want their privilege of ip hoping to be removed.

No. 87044

Dana is 100% self posting and responding to bait in the poly thread, is it possible for mods to reveal her posts so she quits shitting it up?

No. 87045

>>87044
Someone made a thread specifically for her when most anons agreed it was a bad idea. She's enjoying the attention and it's just encouraging her, it's also attracting redditfags in droves

No. 87046

Hellweek. VPN ban. Scrub lolcow from google search results. Do something, please. Shit threads everywhere, newfags everywhere, this is unbearable

No. 87048

>>87046
>Scrub lolcow from google search results
You do know what that means dont you? Dont go giving the snakepist any ideas

No. 87049

>>87045
Yeah it’s out of control. Hell Week for Christmas?

No. 87050

>>87048
there must be a way to de-prioritize the off topic boards specifically, like celebricows brings in a steady stream of tarded twitter newfags constantly.

No. 87051

>>87050
Yeah, I sent a letter to Mr. Google about it but he never wrote me back. Something tells me that Big Internet is trying to destroy Lolcow.

No. 87052

>>87049
Oh I wonder what santamin will bring for me!

No. 87053

>>87050
This would never happen but what if the non cow boards were hidden? In that scenario newfags looking for "femcel 4chan" would either get invested in a cow and be forced to integrate or get bored and leave.

No. 87054

>>87053
theres enough traffic on /ot/ to warrant it being hidden imo.

No. 87055

>>87050
A Google search about onision brought me here in like 2014. Honestly who cares if others come here from Google to gossip as long as they integrate. Which I understand is what you're complaining about the lack of integration. Perhaps mods should give us by balls in mini modding when farmhands don't seem active and clean up the spam if it derails too much. I have no idea why integration is so bad. Can american literacy rates be blamed?

No. 87056

>>87053
The idea of hiding /ot/ isn't new. I think the last time it was seriously discussed was when /ot/ was locked under one of the previous admins.

I would support a trial of hiding the non-cow boards to see if it does anything to improve post quality.

No. 87057

>>87020
AYRT, it's funny that you'd assume that I'm fujo-biased just because of this post. I dislike both the fujocoomer and recent yuri thread and think they encourage braindead infighting in different ways. The concept of a yuri general rather than a "yuri cow thread" is ideal (and has been attempted IIRC?), but would encourage troon/moid activity, so I understand why it isn't a thing like the BL general. In reality, I feel bad for himejoshi, because it's harder for them to curate women-only communities like the fujos (who have their own fujo imageboard containment zone).

No. 87058

>>87057
ntayrt, i guess its a kneejerk reaction since most self proclaimed himejo on this site are very vocal about being anti-fujo and gatekeepy about yuri content along with bragging about their "moral high ground" since theyre not into "scrote centered" media.
Its discouraging to discuss yuri topics when theres this expectation to be a gold star lesbian who only consumes GL and nothing else. I personally tinfoil theyre just lesbian yumejo who heavily self project onto the media they consume which is why they cant see GL content as a story telling media that anyone can enjoy/create regardless of sexual orientation

No. 87059

>>87057
We have a Yuri general for over a year now, it's just dead as fuck because there's maybe 3 himes on this site.

No. 87060

Is "uwu" (used ironically) really considered an emoticon? I've just seen someone catch a redtext for it but I could swear it gets used all the time.

No. 87061

Can a farmhand come get this schizo troon or /2X/ escapee or whatever it is out of the stupid questions thread?
>>>/ot/2289052
>>>/ot/2289060
>>>/ot/2289075
>>>/ot/2289081
>>>/ot/2289148
>>>/ot/2289149
It's starting to doublepost and shit up the thread with its attention whoring.

No. 87062

>>87061
>it
Assuming this is bp-chan, she is actually a female

No. 87063

>>87059
>because there's maybe 3 himes on this site.
word and this is also lolcow so 2 of those himes are going to try and infight with you about stupid shit if you try to post there.

No. 87064

>>87060
its an emoticon which isnt allowed

No. 87065

>>>/pt/948870
>>>/pt/948869
Is this not doxxing? I hate the Trumans as much as anyone else, but both pictures have their address listed. I reported them yesterday but they are still up. Am I missing something?

No. 87066

>>87065
Eviction or not, yeah thats doxxing.

No. 87067

>>87065
>>87066
The images were censored after they were first reported, unless we have missed information somewhere, the address should be removed from both images.

No. 87068

>>87067
My bad, I refreshed everything and see the addresses blocked out now. Thanks!

No. 87069

>>87062
how do we know for sure it’s a female?

No. 87070

>>87069
Catch up on your personalityfag lore.

No. 87071

Can you do something about the retard that's been spamming posts in Funny Caps for the past few days and baiting for infights? It's getting annoying. It's like a failed personalityfag.

No. 87072

The azelia banks spergs in celebritycows are pissing me off. She’s not a celeb anymore and her shit always triggers a based-not based discussion. It’s not milk either what she’s posting on Twitter.

No. 87073

>>87071
what do you consider funny anon? reddit shit?

No. 87074

>>87070
can you read it all out loud for me on the phone while i fall asleep every night

No. 87075

>>87074
Okay. Is your info in the Friend Finder thread?

No. 87076

>>87038
>>87040
>noooo don’t vpn ban certain threads you’re gonna make it harder to bait- I mean kill the site noooo
>ban evading baiter
every time kek

No. 87077

>>87076
It's not even discreet at this point.

No. 87078

>>87040
vpns have been banned on 4chan for like 8 years and nothing changed there

No. 87079

>>87061
Thank you, farmhands.
>>87062
Sorry anon, I miss personalityfags whenever they're active so I don't know too many of them. I know of rancefag, yuripedo, that self-obsessed faggot who spam posts every now and then, and kirby anon. But I don't know their posting history or anything like that. Not sure who bp-chan is, but I'm aware there is an anon obsessed with fellatio, specifically concerning women.
I couldn't tell if this was a troon larping as a depressed blackpilled anon, or one of those extremely mentally ill anons who can't stop themselves from sperging. I just wanted the retard shitting up the thread gone, and the bait with it. Thanks again, farmhands.

No. 87080

>>87073
nta but it really has nothing to do with whether or not the screenshots are funny, but that the person is spamming the thread and not even attempting to maintain anonymity

No. 87081

there is a moid in the american threads openly declaring himself as one and using ''femoid''

No. 87082

moid in amerifag thread

No. 87083

>>87080
Multiple anons use the jungle theme

No. 87085

You need to have a talk with the newfag jannies already, I recall seeing multiple posts wrongfully redtexted as (integrate) when anons were clearly using caps or emojis ironically, which usually doesn't get redtexted. This janny has to be a turboautist not to notice when nonnies are joking.

No. 87086

>>87085
Where?

No. 87087

>>87083
It's not just that. It's the fact that it's the same style, the same file name format, the same 8th grader sense of humour, and the same compulsion to infight. It's very obviously one anon with personal issues, most likely mentally slow.

No. 87088

Can you make a rule banning low IQ posters? Can I report people for being sub 80? Mods?

No. 87089

>>87088
You'd end up banning the entire userbase

No. 87090

>>87083
I have to agree with other anon here. I was watching as those posts were made and then the subsequent infight. If you read the thread back, you can tell it's a single tard shitting the thread up. The posting is all very low effort though, it's kind of strange.

No. 87091

>>87071
The retard that's doing it evaded the ban and is still doing it.

No. 87092

Worst infight of all time happening in amerifag thread
>>87088
Sometimes I just put "retard" in there and mods get the jist. Retards are basically baiters

No. 87093

>>87092
damn already? the new thread has only been up for a couple hours…

No. 87094

>>87093
So many newfags attracted to that thread

No. 87095

>>87069
I've spoken to her offsite.

No. 87096

The blackpill anon has escaped again to rant in the unpopular opinions thread.

No. 87098

Can we delete the cat and dog hate threads? Dog hate one isn’t so bad but the cat hate one is full of zoosadists that openly brag about killing cats. If people wanna talk about this they can fuck off to Reddit surely? What’s the point in them?

No. 87100

>>87098
can not second this hard enough like can’t we just report and delete if they escape their container? why do we have to see shit like that? there’s clearly something so wrong with them and i haven’t even read the posts she’s talking about. it’s not normal to want to harm animals. there’s something really wrong with them and they should be banned from interacting with the rest of us.

No. 87101

>>87098
>>87100
Just hide the freaking threads. All you're doing is bringing more attention to them. If this is about the posts in the unpopular opinions thread, learn2scroll and don't engage. Report any infights and move on. We are on lolcow.farm, if you see an anon start with "I think dogs are overrated and they suck really bad, here is why-" scroll past the post. Report for "breaking containment" if you feel the need. Not everything requires your constant attention and monitoring.

No. 87102

File: 1733406083063.jpeg (199.96 KB, 915x375, IMG_0301.jpeg)

>>87100
>>87101
Doing that is even worse because then stuff like this gets left up and unchallenged.

No. 87103

File: 1733406119417.jpeg (1.06 MB, 975x2182, IMG_0300.jpeg)


No. 87104

>>87103
>>87102
Serial killer vibes

No. 87105

>>87103
Typical dogfaggot getting angry at superior animals but not the shitbeast that licks its balls and eats its feces(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 87106

>>87103
>the shelter can't even take anymore cats because they have too many
Too many shitbulls, they mean. They're the real issue since they get resources wasted on them keeping them alive and stuck in cages/cells for years on end while more adoptable cats and dogs get the shot immediately but anyway.

No. 87107

why do farmhands refuse to lock the skirby thread despite it being a magnet for morons who refuse to integrate and do nothing but make low quality posts? there is not a single drop of milk in that thread. can a farmhand provide some insight as to why they quickly lock other low quality/milkless threads on cow boards but the skirby one gets special treatment?

No. 87109

>>87103
nitpick but calling cats shitbeasts is a bit unoriginal and retarded. Dogs are literal shitbeasts because they look like, smell like, and eat their own shit. At least call cats pissbeasts since that's what they'd be more associated with.

No. 87110

>>87107
The thread is so bad. She doesn't have milk besides making fun of new random photos she defends. She didn't need her own thread. She doesn't have drama related to her.

No. 87111

>>87107
Because the farmhands are retards and this place has gone to shit. The most innocuous things will get you a ban if one of them is feeling bitter but entire threads of pure unintegrated cancer are perfectly fine apparently

No. 87112

>>87098
The dog hate thread is mostly sane as it's focused on pitbulls, the stupidity of shitbull owners and the need to euthanize dogs that are dangerous. The cat hate thread is unhinged and wishes actual abuse on animals.

No. 87113

>>87105
>>87106
>>87109
you’re also weird

No. 87118

>>87101
the animal hate threads don't talk about animals being "overrated". nobody would have a problem with them if they did.
the dog one has a schizo who obsessively follows, screenshots, and rants about Facebook posts and how happy she is when a dog dies. she can't even contain herself to a single thread. the cat hate thread is full of zoosadists.

No. 87119

can mods redtext the word 'coded' like femcelcoded or retardcoded

No. 87120

>>87118
I've seen her posts when I scroll by the dog hate thread. She is posting Facebook posts by people trying to adopt out pitbulls who have a history of aggression and biting. Dogs are meant to be put down when they attack people because they are a danger. Pitbulls are understood to be the most dangerous because they have locking jaws and are bred to be fighting dogs with heightened aggression.
Anons discuss news stories about pitbulls ripping the legs off newborns, and mauling and dismembering their owners obviously they are going to be happy when a dangerous animal like this is put down instead of being adopted out. They aren't breaking any rules. The zoosadist who wrote the post about raping cats was put out to pasture by the farmhands.
Misrepresenting the threads like this, whether moralfagging or illiteracy, doesn't help anything. These threads have been around for years, and learning how to hide threads you don't like to see is part of integration. If you can't handle that responsibility, maybe sites like Twitter or Tumblr where you can report posts for "disturbing content" would suit you better.

No. 87121

>>87118
those anons scare me. It's one thing to not like dogs/cats, but they sound like the retards who like animal torture videos, it's disgusting. zoosadists please go back to /an/

No. 87122

>>86954
Glad i'm not the only one who noticed, I dont get why though? Doesnt that just encourage more vendetta/bad threads?

No. 87124

>>87118
Found a triggered pitnutter in the wild.(dragging an infight to /meta/)

No. 87125

>>87124
Right? It’s not comparable at all. These dogs could maim or kill a person or another pet. It’s a good thing when they get put down. It’s a net positive for society. Wanting to shoot a stray cat just because it was abandoned on the street is pure sadism. Maybe more pitbulls should be put down so we have more room for the stray cats who would never hurt anyone or any other animal unless they were trying to defend or feed themselves.

No. 87126

>>87125
I love cats. I own cats. But this is not true, cats do hunt for sport. They severely damage the ecosystem and many species populations when let outside. It should be a requirement that all cats are kept indoors with any found outside removed from the owner's possession and taken to a shelter.
I wish cat owners didn't have a blind spot about outdoor cats. It would be much more humane to cull feral cat populations than to let these colonies be infected, mauled, and eaten to death. These are slow, painful, and sorrowful deaths.
That said, I still don't have a problem with the cat hate thread. There are posters who hate dogs for "humanitarian" reasons and also out of spite. The same can be said for posters who hate cats.

No. 87127

>>87098
Can you guys learn what zoosadist actually are

No. 87130

>>87125
Dogs that pose risk to humans have no right to exist. It's infuriating that you can commit manslaughter by dog and not even land in prison.(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87132

>>87130
This. Cats aren't bred to be killers. Dogs are. Cats hunt, all animals have hunting instincts. Saying cats can kill is not the same ballpark of dogs killing(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87133

can someone explain why this cat va dog discussion is still continuing? i think you guys need to get over your phobias or something

No. 87134

>>87133
Jannies encourage it by redtexting.

No. 87135

bait in the unpopular opinion thread

No. 87136

Baiting retards back in the unpopular opinions thread schizoposting about different anons being one samefagging anon please just autosage the fucking thread it's worse than the dumbass shit thread atp.

No. 87137

They're making fun of rape victims in the Funny Caps now. You guys are so shit at moderating.

No. 87138

why is the fag in unpopular opinions still not banned yet?

No. 87141

>>87120
>they have locking jaws
This is a myth. They just have strong jaws, there is no "locking" mechanism. The animal is already plenty dangerous without fictional superpowers.(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87142

We need containment for all the retards sperging about lesbians vs straight women and oral sex and the shit that's been happening in the unpopular opinions thread for three threads. Contain it with as much chains as AIslop on this site.

No. 87143

>>87141
it's also used by apologists to defend their dog not letting go, rather than admitting the fact that the dog is a dangerous demon.(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87144

>>87143
>>87141
Jaw-locking or not, those man-made creatures are more dangerous than 'domesticated' cougars. There should be a breeding ban worldwide.(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87145

>>87118
i used to post in the dog hate thread to discuss about shit like bad owners and offleash dogs and ngl i stopped bc of the pitbull facebook schizo, you can clock her repetitive posts from a mile away
she's so annoying, just the same "zomg look at this ugly beast i hope it dies" shit over and over. we get it.

No. 87146

The jewsperg in the Amerifag thread won't shut up about 'muh evil jooz' and keeps derailing everything. I guess they must be using a VPN to ban evade because there's no way they haven't been put out to pasture yet.

No. 87147

>>87146
They’ve sperging about Jews literally all day

No. 87148

>>87147
And worst is when people encourage them by responding like. Just report and ignore (unless fact checking), don't feed it. They come here thinking their retarded rants are going to convince anyone, when they should just stay on 4chud where they belong.

No. 87149

>>87119
this is so retardcoded

No. 87150

>>87145
Why should I care what offends you? Not every thread is going to cater to you 100% of the time. Grow up.

No. 87151

>>87145
Cry harder ya weak bitch.(infight bait)

No. 87152

File: 1733581964646.png (7.82 KB, 1376x70, cbsbcxzxc.png)

So why is anti semitism a big no but blanket racist and classist statements like these are suddenly allowed?
>>87146
>>87147
>>87148
>anyone who criticizes my pedo religion instead of coddling me like my entire life has been is from 4chan!
You people are the biggest hypocrites ever. Judaism is entangled with US politics and it's not derailing in the slightest. It's funny kikes have no issue with racist remarks, but the second someone doesn't put you on a pedestal for once and treat you like the #1 victim suddenly it's the end of the world. And of course, in typical Jew fashion, instead of actually engaging in critical conversation with me, you're just gonna report and cry about "MUH EBIL GOYSSSSSSSS".(ban evasion)

No. 87153

>>87152
Samefag, the context was that I was complaining how my city would rather help rich jews overseas than our majorly POC population where a good portion of them are impoverished bt sending 16 million in bonds to Shitrael that'll never get paid back. This would not have happened if not for Jewish meddling. Truth hurts though I guess.

No. 87154

Why does this annoying jew schizo get to have half their off topic posts left up in the US thread? Might as well ask now since they're shitting up this thread right now, too.

No. 87155

>>87154
You can call me a schizo all you want, but notice how it's never "incorrect". There's something really ironic about being pro censorship on an imageboard.

No. 87156

>>87155
It's not censorship, it's removing low quality and irrelevant posts. If you have a problem with that go back to kiwifarms and /pol/ to let your sperg flag fly.

No. 87157

>>87156
Are you Jewish? Very easy to answer question.
By your logic a good portion of posts would be removed for being low quality and irrelevant, or is it only "low quality and irrelevant" because it criticizes your group? Why is ableism okay but anti semitism is the worst thing possible? I don't give a shit about ableist words on an imageboard, but you should try to keep your principles consistent.

No. 87158

>>87157
I'm not jewish but you continue to obsess over that.
>Why is ableism okay
>try to keep your principles consistent
>By your logic a good portion of posts would be removed for being low quality and irrelevant
What the hell are you even talking about?

No. 87159

>>87158
Okay, if you're not Jewish, why do you staunchly defend 0.2% of the population like their lives defends on it, despite them being very privileged groups of people? Sperg is an ableist slur. So if you're fine with saying words like sperg that are used to dehumanize disabled people, then you should be fine with me saying kike.(/pol/ sperging)

No. 87160

>>87159
I am amazed how much whiteknighting there is on this site when it comes to Jews. You hardly ever see this reaction when it comes to shitting on muslims, blacks, Asians, and moids of any other race/religion. I think it's because they have this perception that shitting on Jews = Nazis which in that case the psyopped worked wonderfully on them.(/pol/ sperging)

No. 87161

>>87160
I think it has more to do with people who dislike jews making it their only talking point and trying to associate their hatred with every topic that is discussed here, like you've been doing in the US thread.

No. 87162

just stop replying to the poltard ffs

No. 87163

>>87161
I'm not >>87160. You realize I talk about other things besides Jews right? It's an anonymous imageboard, it just seems that way in isolation. Whenever someone talks about a certain group of moids they don't get accused of this.
>>87162
Lol once again, classic Jew deflection. "Nazi!" "Poltard!" "Antisemite!" "Just report and ignore because I can't accept criticism and need to cower in fear even on an anonymous imageboard!". You realize a lot of my points were about how Jews have fucked over POC, specifically black Americans right? I don't think a /pol/tard would ever come in defense of a minority group.(/pol/sperging )

No. 87164

>>87163
>I don't think a /pol/tard would ever come in defense of a minority group.
You're not fooling anyone

No. 87166

A scrote is shitting the Ugly Man Psyop thread in ot.

No. 87167

Fujos are derailing the genshin thread with their yurisperging on /m/, please nip it in the bud before this goes on for several hours

No. 87171

>>87170
just go back

No. 87172

Mods, I'd like to know, is talking about sexual trauma a banned topic now?

No. 87174

>>87172
And samefag I'm asking because I was posting in the vent thread around the same time you started deleting the posts by the anon who couldn't tell that exposure therapy didn't verbatim mean exposing herself KEK(posting about yourself in third person)

No. 87176

>>87174
>Can physically see my different post history
>Still accuses me of being the other anon
What the fuck is going on with the farmhands today? I asked a legitimate, easily answerable question. It seems like your only answer is a redtext because you know there's no rules against venting.

No. 87177

>>87176
>>87174
>>87172
There must be new jannie’s who are banhappy today, I guess. If it was hellweek I’d understand banning a nonny who makes herself sound dumb and isn’t familiar with types of therapy most burgers aren’t but whatever , but the rules don’t have any about venting about extremely graphic stuff. It’s probably just recommended to spoiler it.

No. 87178

>>87171
>repeatedly states i don't use /pol/
>y-you dare criticize the precious jews! you are a nazi /pol/ incel moid!
I swear, you retards logic is so circular that a toddler with down syndrome has more critical thought than you.(/pol/sperging/infighting)

No. 87180

If you guys have a VPN block feature can you please just keep it on for at least this thread? Like really why is the complaints and suggestions thread just a big steaming pile of shit? Do your jobs

No. 87182

>>87180
well technically this isn't their job, if it was lolcow would probably be paywalled

No. 87183

>>87150
i know the thread isn't obligated to cater to me which is why i said i quit posting in it, genius.
im still entitled to say the pitbull facebook retard is a nuisance with her constant sperging. this is the complaints thread, you know.

No. 87185

>>87180
I really would not mind if cerbmin brought back vpn bans for this thread and the amerifag thread like we had during the election. They cannot fathom that no1currs about their autistic obsession with da joos

No. 87187

>>87186
Schizophrenia

No. 87188

This tantrum is very likely proving that the VPN would keep the jew sperg out. It's been HOURS and they're still going.

No. 87190

>>87189
I suggested creating an “Israel/Zionism critical” thread about two years ago but I didn’t end up doing it because I figured it would get bombarded with pointless poltard jew hate rather than valid criticism of Israel/Zionism. I think we really do need it as a containment thread so those of us capable of nuanced thinking have a place to discuss that psychotic ideology and its influence on other axes of power (eg the egregious amount of influence the “Christian Zionist” evangelicals have on US politics)

No. 87192

Wait how come the two recurring jewspergs we have are lesbians?

No. 87193

>>87192
I ship them

No. 87194

>>87192
Because the larpers think it puts them on the top of the progressive stack here and will lend them the most credibility.

No. 87195

>>87192
Because lesbians are more likely to have high IQ and therefore question the world around them

No. 87196

>>87190
This is a good idea. I don’t think questioning why a disproportionate amount Jews are in positions of power despite being only 2% of the US population is polsperging though. I consider polsperging shit like “the Holocaust wasn’t real and all kikes should be gassed” or something of that sort.
>>87192
I’m a straight woman.

No. 87197

>>87183
NTA, this complaints thread is for complaints the jannies could help with or ideas that others can come up with, you just complaining about not liking a thread is kinda pointless because there isnt anything anyone can do about it. The only solution is that you do post (if you want to obviously) because varied content in the thread may encourage others to post varied content more to your liking.

>>87189

True.

>>87190
I think the jannies have been good with banning the jew derails and you have a sensible idea so I dont see why your thread could not go ahead.

No. 87198

>>87192
TIMs.

No. 87199

>>87196
That’s exactly how I feel about it, I think the Zionist lobby is more topical now than ever vis a vis not just what is happening in Gaza but its influence on domestic politics in the west, and not only should we be allowed to discuss it but we should be encouraged to discuss it (key word being “discuss”, not screech about muh wooden doors 1488 6 gorillion great replacement or whatever else low IQ alt right fucktards like to spew ad nauseam). I’ll make the thread, even if it will just be two or three of us using it’ll help prevent derailing in other threads

No. 87200

>>87183
well youre a) illiterate and b) in the minority because others obviously see value in her posts considering they arent even sperging to begin with and rightfully bring attention to how much of a menace aggressive dogs and the morons who defend + lie about them to get them re-homed are

No. 87201

Can you at least attempt to moderate celebricows again, please? You tried for like one week before going lazy and letting all the underage TikTokfags shit up the thread with reposts and ages old non milk. They think it's just a thread to post any random cringe thing any celebrity TikTok influencer did +5 years ago as opposed to actual recent milk. I am reporting it but you have to do your part and start being stricter with the bans there, it's straight up unreadable.

No. 87202

>>87196
>>87197
Here you go, nonitas >>>/ot/2295636

No. 87203

>>87197
im complaining about a specifuc user ruining a thread, the pitbull crusader's spots aere easy to spot to the point it's borderline peronalityfagging.
>>87200
one can think these dogs are a menace (i certainly do) and still get annoyed by repetitve autistic posters

No. 87204

There should not be an /ot/ thread dedicated to Israel/Palestine discourse, it's just going to end up being full of /pol/shit and watermelon posting zoomers. Lock that shit before the retardation spreads, please. The Amerifag thread has already invited too much politisperging to the site, we don't need more of it.

No. 87205

Genuinely what is the point of handing out bans for +3 day old posts. It says the ban expired so I'm not even actually being banned it's more of a
>We would have banned you were we not slow and lazy and arrived 3 days late to an infight.
Just let it go at that point. Also, wishing nick Fuentes gets raped is not a-logging, I'm not wishing him death and he'd enjoy it anyways. Stop being such hypersensitive faggots.

No. 87206

>>87205
A-logging is when you wish harm on someone, not just wanting them to die.

No. 87207

farmhands you are desperately needed in the jirai kei thread on /w/, it was posted on twitter by a few of the cows and is now being shat up by retards. it's probably gonna be filled with newfags for the next few days I assume.

No. 87208

>>87204
It’s dedicated to criticism of Israel and Zionist ideology, not just Palestine. There’s a lot of other really relevant shit going on with the politics of Israel and Zionism globally that’s worth discussing

No. 87210

>>87203
well other farmers find the posts informative and thats not what personalityfagging is. of course it will be obvious which posts are hers because she is making a point of posting side by side comparisons of social media lies and shelter posts about pit bulls that have bitten or killed other animals or humans but are being promoted as adoptable family pets. let it go ffs just hide the thread or stay in the dog love containment thread

No. 87211

>>87204
It's gonna get deleted as soon as the jannies wake up. Right now is one of the "dead zones" of moderation. It happens every night. It's obviously a thread made by trolls to bait and infight.

No. 87212

>>87206
By that logic, half the posts on snow would be bannable. Everyone constantly wishes cows harm, whether physical or emotional.

No. 87213

>>87204
>>87211
If there is so much fagging and bait and infighting, then you should be so glad there is now a containment thread for jannies to send retards to when they start their shit in the Amerifags thread again.

No. 87214

>>87213
Ooga booga booga!

No. 87215

>>87210
again learn to read, i don't even like dogs, i used to post in dog hate threads quite a bit before they got overrun by the pitbull obsession. not everyone who disagrees with you is a pitbull lover.
i was just agreeing with another poster that the pitbull facebook poster is obsessive and annoying.
>>87208
yeah it's a topic that merits discussion but lolcow is probably not the right place for it. there's way too much politisperging in /ot/ already and it always brings out the infights and the baiters. no way a thread on such a contentious topic will end well.

No. 87216

>>87211
I think it is very clearly not created by trolls to bait or infight, if you cannot see that then you are either politically illiterate or a brainwashed Zionist who wants to silence anyone who disagrees with you

No. 87217


No. 87218

>>87204
Agreed, and it's going to bring in tankies to boot. I don't want that cancer to infect here too.

No. 87219

>>87207
im convinced the newfags are cannibalizing each other and vendettafagging like crazy kek after lolcow was namedropped on jirai twitter suddenly noone in that thread knows how to sage. i've never seen the thread this fast before and there's so many low quality posts

No. 87220

>>87218
Just hide the damn thread, it’s supposed to serve as containment for the spergery so it doesn’t shit up the Amerifag thread. Not everyone here is an apolitical dolt who is only interested in weeb shit and gossip, some anons are capable of having constructive discussions and hopefully the ones who aren’t and try to bait/fight will get banned.

No. 87221

I have no love for israel but how do you have this much faith in the userbase? Even if you make sure to stay on your best behavior re baiting/responding and racism, look at how well every other thread on this site does at it. LC is just not the place. Find your discussion offite.

No. 87222

>>87221
I mean it clearly is if it’s a topic that is derailing other threads. Hence its creation. If it does become overrun with tankies/twitter zoomers/polfaggotry I’m sure it will get locked but until then let the “jew spergs” have their containment space

No. 87224

>>87207
Could've told you that. I warned moderation that they didn't need multiple fashion threads on w just because each weeb needs their niche

No. 87226

Today has been very eventful with all the Jew sperging and newfags in /w/.

No. 87227

>>87226
They are using lolcow as a chatroom and every user saying "lolcor" is a newfag.

No. 87228

>>87226
Yes can a mod ban all the spergs and newfags pretty please

No. 87229

>>87222
Even if it gets locked, once they come and infest this place, they're not likely to leave.

No. 87230

>>87203
Yes captain obvious, which is why I addressed that complaint. Just…nevermind.

No. 87231

>>87208
This. Also why would someone complain about a containment thread surely thats a good thing?

No. 87233

I don't know if farmhands can figure out which posts are this user's, but they are clearly the only who is cowtipping and using lolcow as their personal army >>>/w/340419

>>87229
That's what I'm worried about. They will just find some other thread, like mirgate to Addy's.

No. 87234

>>87227
ok NTA but I love saying lolcurr and have seen it for a long time I didn't realize it was frowned upon

No. 87235

>>87234
I use all the boards and rarely ever see that used. Can you show me post from 3 years ago where it's use repetitively for months in different threads and not from redtext posts? Those terms exist, but they are not widely used on lolcow in replacement of "lolcow".

No. 87236

Well you all got your fucking wish, the Israel thread got locked even though there was no infighting and relevant resources were being posted that could have facilitated a really good discussion. Good job. Enjoy the “Jew sperg” anon continuing to derail your beloved burgerfag thread

No. 87237

>>87236
I really dont understand mods on this site anymore leaving up obvious bait threads in snow but shutting down a reasonable containment thread.

No. 87238

>>87236
Good riddance.

No. 87239

File: 1733635726512.gif (1.89 MB, 498x336, kek.gif)

>>87236
ROFL!

No. 87240

>>87237
not even lolcor can escape the far reaching tentacles of (((them)))

No. 87241

File: 1733636001987.jpeg (103.46 KB, 608x405, stock-photo-close-portrait-han…)

>>87236
The Jews win again!(bait)

No. 87242

>>87237
it's almost like racebait is banned in this website

No. 87243

The kikes on here are so pleased with themselves, and you wonder why everyone hates you……(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 87244

>>87242
If you bothered to actually look at the thread you’d see that it wasn’t racebait

No. 87245

>>87235
AYRT i said lolcurr a few days ago and i didn't get redtexted…also 3 years ago i don't recall seeing anyone say that on /snow/ or /ot/ either? i don't mean "a long time" as in all of history nona lmao

No. 87246

>>87242
Its almost like you throwing out "racebait" to cover up the truth. Like >>87244 said it wasnt a racebait thread most of the posts I skimmed over were annoyed that American funds were going to Israel. Stop being an idiot.

No. 87247

>>87242
And how is this >>87241 not some Jewish supremacist racebait? Gee I wonder why that’s acceptable but being sensibly critical of Israel is immediately censured

No. 87248

>>87247
>Jewish supremacist
I'm not Jewish kek, I just thought it was funny

No. 87249

>>87237
they can look forward to having to wrangle jewsperg-chan in the amerifag thread and anywhere else she chooses to pitch a tent now that there is no containment thread

No. 87250

>>87219
yeah that's exactly what's happening. they're using it like it's an anonymous discord server or anonymous twitter to vendettafag and fight each other. a farmhand needs to nuke all the unsaged and namefagging chatroom-style spam instead of being so lenient and merely politely warning them to stop. one of them even said the twittards plan to keep shitting up the thread until someone makes a good jirai confessions page so they're just going to ban evade and refuse to integrate.
>>87224
imo the thread was actually going ok up until the cows decided to direct an army of spastics to raid it, now it's going to be nothing but a bunch of spamming idiots fighting with each other constantly and spoiling the milk. the jirai cows seem a lot more unhinged than the lolita cows and the general kawaii/jfashion cows so it makes sense for them to have a separate thread if there's enough milk to sustain it.

No. 87251

>>87235
Nta but I've seen it used in /ot/ plenty of times without any redtexts after that valentine's day incident in 2022, which was how the term started (from some copypasta in the /g/ bunkers). But haven't seen it as much this year.

No. 87252

AGP moid making weird posts in /ot/
>>>/ot/2295897
>>>/ot/2295900

No. 87254

>>87242
>Muhhh antisemitism muhh racism with da poor joos(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 87255

I was on the fence before, but I now firmly believe we need a VPN ban. Not necessarily site-wide by at least in the threads that get shat up the most.

No. 87256

File: 1733651529543.png (823.45 KB, 761x1608, 1000039523.png)

Not my post but this is a ridiculous redtext. Can you not get a sane farmhand? nm, there's probably just one anyway.

The post isn't "misleading," even if it's boring and not milky. No one needs to cap every single thing about a reel like a fucking journalist. She still copied her "Inspiration" exactly. Do the farmhands even know what "vendetta" means?

No. 87257

moid thread in ot and newfags bumping it

No. 87259

Please do something about the white knighting age sperg who keeps derailing Shayna's thread, they've been at it for days now

No. 87260

LC has proven to itself again it's run by neolib zionist shills and I am going to continue to post in the Amerifag thread because I'm sick of the influence they have in politics over our nation. The jannies have proven time and time again they want to kill this website but this is a new low.
>>87198
>anyone who criticizes my pedophilia ridden religion is a male! all women have lukewarm libshit beliefs
>>87204
Love how you didn't mention Zionist shills or Jewish supremacists as part of the problem, your bias is showing!
>>87211
Funny, because there are countless janny-approved bait threads up right now.
>>87218
>muh tankies!
Lmao, only chronically online libsharts care about tankies. I don't like them either but come on.
>>87231
Jews can't handle criticism. You can see it in this thread. Notice how every valid criticism is labelled as one of the following:
>polsperging
>anti semitism
>moid
>nazi
>report this user
Lmao.
>>87238
>>87239
I can only hope your shitty ethnostate gets nuked off the map. No wonder your ilk has been expelled from 100+ countries, you are truly vile sociopathic people.
>>87240
Based
>>87242
Jewish deflection tactic.
>>87247
Mods are either zionist shills or kikes themselves, it really is the only explanation.
>>87255
Isnotreal shill dogwhistle.(ban evasion)

No. 87261

>>87260
yeah it's known this site is filled with jewish bitches and they can hate on ex-muslims and racebait like it's nothing but the moment you mention any other race or religion whatever that day their cult is you're banned

No. 87262

>>87261
This was always weird to me. I see so much vitriol toward them but it's never considered racebaiting. How are jews only 0.2% of the population but make up a disproportionate amount of LC users.

No. 87263

>>87260
News flash for newfags. The discussion of conspiracy theories involving jews is not new to LC. Years ago, around the time of Shaymin, it was discussed in depth in the tinfoil thread. No one was banned and jewish anons took part in the conversation. The difference is that no one resorted to using insults based on race, ethnicity or religion. It was just a respectful discussion where different view points were shared.

The instant anyone resorts to acting like a hysterical /pol/tard shrieking about "k*kes" and repeating /pol/ rhetoric they are going to get banned under global rule 7. This shouldn't be hard to understand but I guess the quality of the userbase has declined.

No. 87264

>>87263
I'm not new and you're a retard. In this very general we've seen anons engaging respectfully in conversation that just so happens to pertain to criticizing jews is considered "muh racebait" or "muh polsperging"
>censorship of the word kike
Sure you're not the newfag?

No. 87265

>>87263
"Conspiracy theories involving Jews" or "conspiracy theories that aren't theories so much as they are demonstrably factual about Jews being solely responsible for certain phenomena"? Because there is a distinction

No. 87266

>>87264
I'm the Christian Palestinian nona who posted in the thread before it got locked and it's a bit disappointing that the one place on my beloved lolcor that offered me the prospect of sperging freely but well within site rules about what Israel is doing to my people was shut down almost immediately but I can't say I'm surprised. It is what it is, innit but I really do appreciate the handful of you anti-Zionist nonacitas ♥

No. 87267

>>87260
>everyone who's tired of my retarded rants is a joo!! This site would be dead without my jewsperging

No. 87268

>>87263
Did you actually look at the thread? No one was racebaiting or infighting. In addition to being a containment thread it had the potential for genuine dialogue but it was preemptively and unfairly locked, and now the “Jew sperg” is going to keep posting in the Amerifag thread which will lead to more infighting and derailing not just there but in this thread too.

No. 87269

>>87256
I've seen a couple other people make the same video. Taylor isn't special for redoing it too. Why even post that?

No. 87270

>>87256
I'm so sick of the vendettafags on taylors thread. no matter how hard you convince otherwise its too obivous thag thread is full of jealous bitches who wish they had her life. thatbthread could go in another direction with the bitter fatty chans gone

No. 87271

>>87255
At least in this thread. Atp this thread is like Dumbass Shit lite.

No. 87272

The milkless spamming by newfags in the jirai thread who don’t know how to sage since yesterday is lobotomy inducing. They are literally typing as if it’s a group chat and you can’t see any actual milk because of it. Give them longer bans!

No. 87273

>>87256
It's pointless, nonnie. The moderation of Taylor's thread has been a complete joke for a while now. Wks nitpick and report every single post and mods blindly ban. They even confessed almost every post gets reported. Yet they fail to ban the report button offenders, moreover they encourage such behaviour. Of course it will get out of hand, when wks get supported by the mods, instead of being banned.

>>87270
Posting proof of objectively bad and lazy content is not vendetta, dumbass. Look up the definition of vendetta before showing off the retardation. I suppose it was you who reported the post, judging by the language of the ban message and this incoherent thought train. Plus, you frequent the tread to spew your "You're all jealous of my princess Taylor" every now and then. Couldn't stay silent when her talentless posts got called out?
Anyway. How come mods haven't banned a nutcase wk yet?

No. 87274

>>87272
Agree, the whole thread is a mess now. It’s just all vendettaposting from twitter jirais

No. 87275

>>87272
Ban those fuckers permanently. They're shitting up the whole site.

No. 87276

>>87272
farmhands should delete their posts. they already got a warning to stop shitting the thread up by farmhands. banning does nothing, they just ban evade and continue posting like the thread is their personal chatroom.

No. 87277

>>87276
since they are too retarded to not manually type Anonyyyy in the name box but not sage, I had hoped they might have been too retarded to know how to ban evade kek

No. 87278

>>87196
they're 6% of the population of the US. using /pol/ statistics isn't helping you beat the allegations. can you at least be more creative?

No. 87279

>VPN get implemented
>website becomes hugbox
>mods have access to your IP and data
>people start leaving
>website is killed entirely
My internalized misogyny is slowly rising…

No. 87281

>>>/w/340501
>>>/w/340502
>>>/w/340503
>>>/w/340505
>>>/w/340506
You need to do something about the amount of unhinged milkless spamming by this vendettachan twitterfag who needs to take their meds.

No. 87283

>>87282
I don't think you of all people should be calling other people retards.

No. 87285

>>87270
This. Always posting the dumbest things and they refuse to admit its nitpicking, trying to string along tinfoils too.

>>87273
>you meanie you big report wk
Unhinged retard. I'm the one who reported it. There's a bunch of users who find these posts pointless and not milky. Maybe if they were they wouldn't get banned.

No. 87286

There's an unhinged moid on the loose in /ot/ rambling about the appearance of shooters and arguing about suicide. Can you please moderate /ot/ or if you don't wanna do that can you please turn the VPN block on? I get it if you're all busy on weekends or whatever but if you just turn the VPN block on your workload decreases substantially.

No. 87287

>>87266
Zionist shills are EVERYWHERE you can't even escape them in lolcow, incredible, hoping the best for you nona

No. 87289

>>87256
>>87273
Came to report this, but I was late. The post is not milky but it was saged. Sure it is not a great contribution and not news, but archiving these examples is part of thread culture, too.

Mods really should stop the nitpicky bans just because a couple of whiny bitches kept hitting report.

No. 87290

>>87287
I wouldnt have believed you a day ago and thought it really wasnt an issue here, guess I was wrong.

No. 87291

I don't think scrotefoiling should be a bannable offense.

No. 87293

>>87268
We don’t need a containment thread we need a VPN ban in the American thread.

No. 87295

again i am here asking for some sort of stricter moderation in the celebricows threads. so many of the posts are people complaining about other anons. today i've seen several replies to SAGED posts that are just saying "this isn't milk!!!!" (yeah that's why it was saged) and the whole thread reeks of unintegrated retards who just learned about the site 1-2 weeks ago and are trying to integrate by pretending to fit in and treat the thread like a chatroom where they can just bitch out anyone for any reason. can we get stricter/longer bans for the obvious tourists and newfags or something? every single celebricows thread gets so flooded with unnecessary posts that it feels like summer all over again, it just keeps getting worse. the thread is for discussing celebrities and i'm seeing more posts of people picking fights and acting like underage retards who don't know they don't have to reply with all of their grievances. i know taking shit to /meta/ does absolutely nothing, as i've learned. but still i have to bring it up again because it's such a garbage thread. i used to be for the auto-saging of "dumbass shit" because admins said it is where most of the tourists come from but now i'm not sure if i believe that because the sites gotten worse since then and celebricows is clearly full of tourists

No. 87297

when is the next hellweek

No. 87298

>>87295
There's also that anon/anons I think it's trump-chan from before who keep spamming and reposting shit that was already posted multiple times, and posting people who aren't even celebrities to begin with. I think some of them genuinely don't know how to scroll/crtl + f/or lurk

No. 87299

coming in here to see a million hours old posts about how evil jews run the world with zero redtext is something else

No. 87300

>>87295
Are you seriously sperging about… anons rightfully complaining about the redditard tourists spamming the thread with non milk?? Just because it's saged doesn't mean it's ok to post absolute retardation and reposts from previous threads. You're so painfully the retarded newfag in question, gtfo and quit shitting up the thread. We will keep complaining until all you retarded unintegrated tourists are gone.

No. 87301

File: 1733727809819.png (1.5 MB, 720x916, 1733400187245.png)

how it feels to see your question get ignored because a retard posts bait directly under you and nonas falling for it bumps out your post

No. 87302

>>87301
How it feels when I write an effortpost and the person who asked the question ignores me completely

No. 87303

>>87301
>>87302
Kek, which threads?

No. 87306

unspoilered loli on the front page from the gijinka thread on /m/ is kinda distasteful but im not sure if others would agree

No. 87307

>>87306
it's not nsfw but it is kinda borderline lolishit, the anon probably just wanted to post cute pokemon shit though

No. 87308

>>87299
seriously. /ot/ is completely unusable.

No. 87309

>>87307
>>87306
Yeah, NTA but it's in that area of plausible deniability where people who aren't as experienced with anime fans could mistake it for "just" cute moe girls. I doubt the OP was being malicious.

No. 87311

I think the fujo vs. antifujo thread should have a VPN ban, if not locked entirely. It contributes literally nothing to the site and doesn't even properly contain spergouts about fujos (which continue to happen in other threads anyway.) It's just the same handful of anons shrieking the same five talking points ad-nauseum, never actually listening to each other or changing their minds.

No. 87312

>>87311
Atleast they're not shitting up other threads let them bark at each other

No. 87313

>>87311
Delete the fujocoomer thread while you're at it. At least in the antifujo vs fujo thread all parties can talk about it. In the former thread fujos aren't allowed to say anything without getting a ban

No. 87314

blackpillers in the americafag thread.

No. 87315

>>87314
in the amerifags thread

No. 87316

Are you seriously banning people in the amerifag thread for saying that the trad shooter moid isn't attractive?? The fuck? Are you ovulating or something?

No. 87317

can we unlock amerifags so the luigi husbandofags can go back to drooling over him together please

No. 87318

>>87316
no it's because you are a ban evading blackpiller

No. 87319

>>87317
whore(infighting)

No. 87320

Rip in pepperoni Amerifag thread

No. 87321

>>87317
join us in /g/ instead

No. 87322

>>87313
>still begging for mods to delete the fujocoomer thread
Do you tards ever give up.

No. 87323

We need to contain the shooter moid simps kek

No. 87324


No. 87327

>hellmas
Nice. I like the idea, looking forward to seeing how different /ot/ is with VPNs banned

No. 87330

Thank you jannies ♥
merry hellmas kek

No. 87340

>>87303
I deleted it out of shame and hope to ask the question again later, now that hellweek is up

No. 87342

>>87322
Waaaa waaaa they wanna take my special thread where the evil fujo is banned from speaking to me!!! MODDIES HELP ME

No. 87344

>>87342
you're proving their point

No. 87345

Tbh it was funny at first but the entire amerifag thread is just thirsting. No one wants to say anything about it either lest the janny with a hard on for him bans them for infighting

No. 87351

Will someone please delete that random innocent baby picture from Shay's thread? It's just not right.

No. 87352

>>87351
Why do anons do this? Shay isn't milky, do anons really get a kick out of anticipation for a new porn video? It's been the same content except for her boobjob for years

No. 87353

>>87344
WAAAAAA SAVE ME MODS FROM THE FUJOS AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!
No matter the response I give, literate or hysterical, they'll twist it around in their favor anyway. May as well have fun

No. 87361

The snowflakes are so cute. Can you code it go down the entire page length?

No. 87365

I've noticed a sudden uptake in the term "chud" being used, and the only people who use that term unironically are troons on discord

No. 87367

>>87365
Chud is just a leftist term for right wingers it's nothing to do with trannies

No. 87369

>>87367
I've been here for 6 years never seen it unironically used until last week, and yes it's a term only troons ever use

No. 87370

>>87365
>>87369
I've seen it used all over Tumblr and Twitter for like 2 years as shorthand for autistic male e-rightists and I avoid troons like the plague. I think you guys just don't use mainstream social media (good for you). Willing to bet troons are probably who brought that term from 4chan to the normie internet tho since most of them are "ex" alt righters.

No. 87374

File: 1733835245062.png (67.1 KB, 767x407, 1733834506753.png)

Stolen from the retarded bans thread but the hypersensitive fujotard janny needs to chill already kek they weren't even mocking you, but fakebians. This is embarrassing, maybe you're too sensitive to moderate if you can't handle seeing the word fujo outside the context of praise without reeeeing and handing out bans indiscriminately, this isn't a dictatorship

No. 87376

>>87369
It's been used for months now

No. 87385

>>87374
Haha seethe

No. 87391

>>87376
where exactly?

No. 87392

File: 1733866434585.png (5.29 KB, 792x81, 347732.png)

Why are posts like which promote supremacism over one religion allowed, yet anyone who criticizes that religion is banned? This is just as racebaity as the anti semites of LC and mods are showing a clear bias.

No. 87393

Amerifag thread has jewsperging again. Why the fuck do anons keep doing this. Go talk about it on twitter or reddit or 4chan or something, not here.

No. 87395

>>87393
>jewsperging is when you dare have an opinion different than me!
Would you have the same reaction if this were said about muslim moids? Or black moids? Or christian moids? Or asian moids?
>>87394
Promoting hateful religious extremism isn't a joke. Stop pearl clutching whenever someone dare criticizes judaism.

No. 87396

>>87395
I really don’t think it’s that serious, but report it to farmhands if it hurt your feelings so badly

No. 87397

>>87395
The "jews are all in the porn industry, they're ruining murica!!" shit is literally a retarded /pol/ talking point. I don't go to lolcow to see retarded /pol/ talking points regurgitated. There's other places to do that (like /pol/) if you absolutely cannot get it off your mind

No. 87398

>>87397
Are you going to answer my question or did you just admit to your own biases despite there being clear facts that show jews are heavily involved in the porn industry?

No. 87399

>>87398
I don't give a fuck that jewish people are in the porn industry. Honestly. Again, there's other places you can go to have this boring conversation. Why must you try to keep doing it on lolcow?

No. 87400

>>87399
>Would you have the same reaction if this were said about muslim moids? Or black moids? Or christian moids? Or asian moids?
You didn't answer my question. I'm assuming you're a jewish and feel the need to defend moids of your tribe no matter what, all moids are deplorable and that includes jewish moids.(jewsperging)

No. 87401

>>87392
bc you are baiting and (nta) that is sarcasm. stop sperging, also it has nothing to do with the thread

No. 87406

File: 1733878945722.jpeg (702.58 KB, 828x1325, IMG_6685.jpeg)

i might be remembering wrong but wasn't that a self-poster? in the small web/geocities thread

No. 87409

File: 1733881317358.jpg (171.79 KB, 597x1223, Screenshot_20241210-050226_Chr…)

>>87391
Idk just randomly on all different kinds of threads, it started popping up around 6 months ago

No. 87411

>>87406
yes the grandmafag is an annoying self-poster who has been banned lots of times already

No. 87414

Did maintenance ever end up happening and I missed it or is it being pushed back to another date?

No. 87417

Look how quiet the fujo vs. anti-fujo thread is now that yuripedo and the retard who called NGE lolibait got banned. Nature is healing

No. 87418

File: 1733898906404.jpg (55.94 KB, 750x1000, flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f…)

>>87369
Chud has been used on 4chan for over 10 years now, its a term for /pol/tards with a certain look and has nothing to do with trannies? Never even seen a tranny use chud.

No. 87420

>The Zionism containment thread got shut down, ok fine.
>The ex-muslims thread is now full of pro israel shit and the only two redtexted posts are complaining about israel, attacking ex muslims and arabs is fine

Yeah I didnt think farmhands were doing it deliberately but after seeing that thread I cant help but be suspicious. For the record Im not defending moids of other races on the contrary i'm just trying to understand why its ok to talk about some but not others. Either be consistent and ban all race/country talk or let it all be ok. Moderating like you are now does make it look like you have a bias whether you do or not.

No. 87423

>>87420
I checked the thread and the only anon who posted pro-Israel comments in the last 48 hours got banned. The anon who posted ‘least evil jew’ didn’t get banned. The rest of the thread after that doesn’t talk about Israel at all.

No. 87429

>>87417
Vpn ban was the best thing that happened

No. 87431

I thought /shay/ would be great, instead it's sucked all the fun out of shay threads.

No. 87445

File: 1733941015999.png (413.71 KB, 360x800, weegee.png)

can we please enforce the Luigi containment thread on /g/? I get it he's a hot guy and all but a few nonnas have been flooding like 5 different threads hornyposting about him and it's getting exhausting.

No. 87447

>>87423
I checked the posts I was looking at the older ones (3 days) not the newer one talking about the region. Yes the recent posts dont talk about it, I guess maybe thats why its not been redtexted.

No. 87448

>>87445
Send them to /pol/ and record the results kek, that guy is causing havoc on so many boards across the net its hilarious.

No. 87456

Isn't >>>/w/340755 breaking the same rule as >>>/w/336817

It's outstanding how even farmhand warnings do nothing to make sure milk is posted in that thread. It's going to be boring nitpicking forever.

No. 87457

>>87429
Frankly, that thread should have a permanent VPN ban. The conversation is a lot more fresh and interesting when it's not bogged down by baiters and ban evaders.

No. 87463

The same anons who were obsessing over rancefag are now obsessively talking about the yuripedo whenever they can. Is it reportable? I cant imagine having imageboard attention whores living in your head 24/7

No. 87464

>>87463
yes. i report people for encouraging personalityfags all the time and the farmhands usually ban and redtext them

No. 87466

>>87464
Nta, but I do too. Specifically "encouraging anons to personalityfag".

No. 87467

Reeks of vendetta or probably the moid who's been shitting up the cosplay thread >>>/w/340796

No. 87468

>>87456
nta but everything boring or things you don't like are not all "nitpicking." The farmhands need to be taught what it is. Kek at 'someone' valiantly defending the cow after every post with typical grammar/spelling mistakes and then the red text has them too.

No. 87470

Is this a new rule? Been here for years and addressing the cow has been pretty common practice as far as I'm aware. Not debating whether or not it's a shit post in a shit thread (it is), or whether addressing the cow is gay (yes), just not sure when it became against the rules?
>>>/snow/2066904

No. 87471

I'm pretty sure there are one or two anons still baiting across /ot/, does anyone else feel that way kek?

No. 87473

>>87471
it feels like it's summer break again honestly (probably because it's winter break), i think the VPN ban has helped but i think the remaining newfags who don't use VPN still think this place needs to be bait/infight/derail central. so many unintegrated retarded posters everywhere you look

No. 87474

>>86783
"Go back" should be redtexted and bannable, it is incredibly annoying and retarded and probably mostly used by newfags who wants to feel a part of the site but don't quiet get what the lingo means yet

No. 87476

There's a moid baiting and licking Elon's taint in the Amerifag thread
>>>/ot/2305131
>>>/ot/2305201

(repost bc I fucked up the linking, sorry farmhands)

No. 87480

>>87470
Yes. It's been banned even before 2018. It's not explicitly written anywhere I don't think, but anons trying to use lolcow to "send a message" to the cow is a completely autistic thing to do.

No. 87481

>>87468
The mods are quick to ban every single critical post, but the wk sperge about godforsaken fonts is allowed to go on. Wks use their usual tactic of derailing the discussion by mentioning a small detail or word from the critical posts and sperging about it as if it will somehow discredit the criticism. There's been more than enough comments about the fonts when the discussion was first of all about Taylor's laziness and lack of creativity. All this dumb nitpicking just derails the thread, but mods are conveniently absent. Meanwhile critical posts get banned within hours if not minutes after being posted. What a coincidence! Make it make sense.

No. 87482

>>87481
I double-checked and if by critical you mean posting every instance of shilling and copying trends, then you must be new to the internet because that's what everyone does.

No. 87483

>>87482
If anons posted every single shill, the thread would've run out already because that's all she's been posting for the past year. And yes, halfassing and ripping off content as an influencer is a valid critique, especially if the said content is a text wall with a two second clip in the background. So is questioning a creator's integrity, when they start abusing the trust and loyalty of a fanbase by exploiting it to sell people products they themselves don't use and then getting offended when such behaviour is called out and questioned.

No. 87484

>>87483
You described rule 7.2 perfectly and why mods had to step in and make all these extra rules for the thread, so almost none of that is allowed to be posted at all anymore. It's been all she's done for over a year like you said. That's all that's been posted aside from more nitpicks like her hair, how she cares for her son which hasn't been abusive or neglectful and pointless to post, and tinfoiling about her currently having eating disorders. It's almost like having a slow thread is impossible, but if anons waited for milk like they should it would be extra milky due to the drought. The issue is some farmers can't handle that.

No. 87486

I think the Lolcow Award Nomination thread is locked.

No. 87488

>>87486
you were right, it was my bad, I hit lock instead of sticky, thank you anon!

No. 87501

>>87484
are you a mod, or just speaking for them? Why do you clog up the thread defending her whenever someone posts something that is boring or uninteresting? Why not just ignore it?

No. 87507

Anons in the confession thread encouraging the retard personalityfag again. As long as you don't ban people for encouraging them they will never go away

No. 87509

>>86783
I don't get how so many people's posts were deleted in the cosplay CRINGE thread? What is up with that??? Anyone can post anything cringe worthy regarding cosplay from TikTok,Twitter Etc and no it isn't vendetta.now the thread is boring and unusable.

No. 87514

>>87509
There's a known ex biyfriend of a cow whos been on a thot-hate train in that thread and not actually posting milk. Just going on about kinpatsu and posts nobodies to complain about onlyfans content. Every post has been "ugh so ugly onlyfans thot why even try?" We have a thot thread, but the retard doesn't know how to use the site.

No. 87516

Moids baiting in ugly man psyops and calling everyone a nazi for not sucking enough minority cock

No. 87519

>>87501
>you
None of the recent redtexts are mine or have been. The anon was saying repetative comments have been scrutinized in that thread, so I tried to explain even though mods already have. The thread is practically on a final warning, but let's keep posting about trend-hopping Taylor. Again. We have locked cow threads all over PT, SNOW, AND W, so it's not isolated that doing this in threads is getting them locked. You're really defending the wrong type of farmers when these types of nitpicking and tinfoiling posts got even Venus locked. The vendettafagging is palpable.

No. 87521

>>87519
I have no idea why but some anons have to always turn laughing at specific cows into some righteous moralfagging crusade mixed with the pettiest nitpicking nonsense. /w/ is filled with anons who take their cows too fucking seriously and ruin the fun of laughing at some random bitch on the internet.

No. 87524

>>87521
Simply some users prefer fresh milk to low-hanging fruit. No one wants dozens of threads where you have to wade through shitposts in order to get to the quality.

No. 87526

>>>/w/340853
Not the anon you banned but how you going to redtext someone as hi cowing retard when you didn’t understand the context of what was said and what they were replying to, which was ironically
>sensitive bby retards who lack reading comprehension apparently
They was agreeing with them and using the very generalised “you” not hi cowing. I get it’s hellweek but it’s for you guys to tighten up on your moderation, not ban people for your own poor reading comprehension. Unsaged red text was warranted tho.

No. 87531

>>87526
Should've been redtext for encouraging cowtipping if deemed "absolutely necessary". Cowtipping is never necessary from farmers.

No. 87532

The Taylor R thread needs to be autosaged

No. 87533

>>87532
at least throw her in a general after the thread reaches max please no more useless nitpicking threads for cows who aren't milky because it keeps bad farmers around

No. 87535

>>87531
Ayrt. Agreed that was retarded and deserved redtext but I doubt janny noticed that and just saw
>”you”
>BAN
kek

No. 87537

>>87535
Tbf there's a bunch of newfags in there and might've been confused,due to unsaging, as a previous cow tipper. "Unsaged" is the ban, but "hi cow retard" might be what they are calling the user. It deserves a ban regardless.

No. 87539

>>87519
please define vendettafagging.

I'm not defending the posts, I'm annoyed at the one or two people who just have to shit up the thread if anyone says anything at all. At least the farmhand has finally started banning the people complaining about the thread in the thread, which is clearly against the rules.
>even Venus
predictable

>>87533
the thread can be slow, and you can hide it - the farmhand has even suggesting hiding threads you don't like instead of playing minimod. General threads are like garbage cans. She's a legacy cow and has milk sporadically. I can't imagine going into some other cow's thread and reeeing for it to be autosaged or locked when … I can just not click on it!

No. 87540

>>87539
venus was an important cow are you happy she's locked or something? what's with farmers trying to kill off threads bc they can't be arsed to post milk?

No. 87542

>>87540
no, there's a poster that always uses examples of "cows anons ruined" and her favorite right now is Venus. I haven't visited Venus's thread in awhile so I didn't even realize it was locked. Probably shouldn't be, especially if Venus was posting here

No. 87544

>>87542
She's not posting there and some retarded farmers in her discord helped get her socials deleted, personally the mods she put in place.

No. 87548

>>87445
i come back after two days to see luigi needs a containment board kek, not surprised

No. 87593

What is going on in Heather's thread right now? It used to be pretty tame but now we've got groomer debate, fucking troonfoiling, and now some anon is linking resources in case Heather checks the thread kek

No. 87594

Some retards are fighting over the Luiji guy again in Vent thread because they hate Christmas can you please ban them forever

No. 87595

did the /ot/ farmhand quit or go on vacation or something haven't seen a lot of bans in the past few days despite supposed hell week its cool if they did everyone needs a break

No. 87598

>>87595
Weekends are slow. Always.

No. 87600

Lock >>>/m/440644 we already have ugly man psych-op on /ot/

No. 87601

>>87600
The one fitard going crazy in there right now spamming pics of uglies is so obviously a moid

No. 87611

there’s a schizo camped in gioyc that freaks out and accuses everyone of responding to them and being a schizo when you make posts about your own life. even with more care taken to make sure the post before the one i make and my post are different enough they couldn’t be confused. it’s getting really annoying to be accused of either being a schizo or of being someone this person knows with a husband any time anyone wants to make a post in there and then be accused of what they’re doing.

No. 87613

alogging poltards in amerifag thread

No. 87614

Asking for the millionth time please please turn "asexual", "aromantic", and "queer" into red words

No. 87625

Pokemon porn spammer on /m/

No. 87628

>>>/m/440980

this feels pretty ridiculous even for hellmas. if you clicked the link anon posted the first thing you can see is a pokegirl getting DPed by raichus. that’s really gross and not in the spirit of the monsterfucker thread imo.

No. 87629

>>87628
agreed. i don't know wy telling someone not to post revolting furry porn is infighting.

No. 87632

>>87614
I concur

No. 87635

>>87628
Nta, but pokemon count as monsters. Just because they are uwu doesn't make them not.

No. 87636

why aren't pointless bait posts like >>>/m/441127 just deleted instead of being redtexted

No. 87637

>>87635
Pokemon look vastly different from each other and have different levels of sapience. Wanting to fuck Mewtwo is not the same as wanting to fuck Sprigatito.

No. 87638

so my post about the tranny short film was deleted for some reason, can I request to be allowed to repost it?

No. 87640

>>87635
it's a monsterfucker thread not a furfag thread, and in any event you aren't allowed to post porn in /m/. and yet that retard janny banned everyone that said pokeporn is gross, but not the porn poster. It's bullshit.
Saying 'pokemon porn is disgusting' is not bait and it sure as fuck shouldn't be a bannable offense.

No. 87641

>>87637
Seems like a reach to nitpicking which ones are monsters and which one aren't. They are called "Pocket Monsters". Monster fuckers teeter on animal fucking when you add in things like werewolves and centaurs. Pokemon is the same.

No. 87642

>>87641
legitimately floored by what you’re defending but also by that threads existence in general.

No. 87643

>>87641
Okay animal fucker.(infight bait)

No. 87644

>>87628
same,i dont know why farmhand still hasn't deleted that post linking to that site.

No. 87647

>>87642
I just don't know what anons expect when theres crossed lines considering anons are admitting some of them are monsters. Either all of them are or none are. This is when the cherry picking causes issues in thread.

>>87643
Nice bait

No. 87653

There is an abundance of deeply retarded newfags migrating into the cow threads. It's actually been worse since the VPN ban (which I'm for, it's just not helping this particular issue) and I feel like I'm reporting more than I'm replying at this point

No. 87655

Hello, Moderators.
At 8:07 I made a post on accident with my VPN that was
">>2312033
I like gal, I'll join you in on using that as apart of my daily vocabulary.
Chick sounds too cutesy and I don't like how it connects to baby chickens."
I can't tell if it went through, if so can it be deleted?

No. 87656

CP(?) on /m/

No. 87657

That was a very fast response, thank you mods

No. 87661

Can someone please ban the retard in the addy thread that keeps complaining about how insta gram reels are being posted

No. 87663

Can mods redtext things like "fr" and "cap"?

No. 87664

>>87663
add 'bruh' to this list. Fuckin tiktok zoomers

No. 87665

>>87663
Cap is used too often when referring to screen caps

No. 87666

Why cant flood detection be corrected? This shit is so annoying

No. 87667

>>87664
>>87663
Talk about trigger words. I hope they don't, that's so pointless. You plan to do that with every generation?

No. 87668

>>87665
That's true, maybe not "cap" but "fr" and "bruh" should definitely be redtexted, I've been seeing it so much lately

No. 87669

>>87664
Since when is bruh a zoomer thing kek

No. 87670

>>87669
Every slang created since 2010 is now zoomer words

No. 87671

>>87669
Just fucking integrate please

No. 87672

>>87667
>Talk about trigger words. I hope they don't, that's so pointless
Look at one of the words you typed anon kek. They already do it and should do it for more.

No. 87673

>>87663
'it's giving' is taking over this site and is absolutely embarrassing

No. 87674

dog hate out of containment in unpopular opinions. beautiful computer ladies KILL THEM!!!

No. 87675

trannies are spamming cp on /m/

No. 87676

CP on /m/

No. 87677

the pitbull obsessed schizo is racebaiting in unpopular opinions

No. 87678

>>87677
just came here to report that again too they’ve pivoted to homophobia now and the racebaiting is still up.

No. 87683

Racebait all over unpopular opinions

No. 87685

>>87672
I think you missed the point of using the word 'trigger' as an example. 'fr' 'cap' and 'bruh' are not trigger words. They are just abbreviations and slang you don't like. It's not the same.

No. 87686

Retards trying to instigate racebait infighting in the unpopular opinions thread.

No. 87687

got range banned for repeatedly pointing how cruel people are in snow. it's become tiresome. people can attempt to drive the vulnerable to suicide on the reg by highlighting humiliating moments or sensitive info but god forbid you call out the psychos.

No. 87688

>>87687
range banned? which thread are you talking about?

No. 87689

>>87687
Anon, please go back. That is obviously not what the board is for it's about laughing at cows.

No. 87690

>>87689
no. all debate is valid, barring the shit that has legal consequences which wouldn't be what this site would dal with. if you want to be insufferable and a psycho stop getting mad at people responding to you go complain.

No. 87691

>>87685
Do you think certain words are redtexted because they're triggering?

No. 87692

>>87690
>all debate is valid
Yeah maybe in a debate class but this is lolcow and mods have determined you annoying enough to ban, sorry! You will be silenced ♥

No. 87693

>>87687
>>87690
What made you come to this site? Actually curious. This place has always been a gossip image board, not sure why someone who is against that would even come here

No. 87694

>>87687
Did you have to drive across state lines to post this? Kek

No. 87720

This user is bringing up milk from almost a decade ago and won't post caps with the excuse of 'it's on facebook somewhere and also pull'. The user needs to provide caps, not blame others for asking about caps and acting like it's not a big deal they won't post them. Also not sure why all his rancid milk is being brought up anyway. Nothing new is being posted regarding her personality or anything either. If anons wants to reee about their real opinion about Mikan, we have a thread for that. >>>/w/341237

No. 87728

The Dana thread is so infested with redditfags it's headache inducing to scroll through. The milk is utterly dry at this point and there was no reason to give her a separate thread, a handful of disturbing revelations doesn't warrant an entire thread of obvious poop touching and talking to the cow. I've never lost interest in a horrorcow, or any cow, so fast.

No. 87731

File: 1734880871997.jpg (538.82 KB, 904x1929, 1000011969.jpg)

Hey admin and farmhands can you look into the farmhand from NI on your team? I asked for a few of my posts to be deleted in the vent thread last week and they obliged and said they were also a fenian and for me not to be such a melt and now shockingly I've had a user stalk me across the site and keep trying to intimidate me. Very weird. My apologies if it isn't the farmhand but weird coincidence if not. You can tell her I don't have social media for her to try and autistically try and dox me. I mean I don't want to encourage the schizos that claim farmhands have vendettas against certain users but like wtf.

No. 87732

>>87731
This is embarrassing for you to try and pin this on a farmhand. I genuinely feel bad for that farmhand because you just revealed their location out of blind rage. Sad.

No. 87733

>>87732
Maybe farmhand shouldn't have revealed it to me in a ban lmao

No. 87734

>>87731
We have looked into this. The person you are referring to is not a farmhand, or at the very least they are not logged in and a farmhand account has never used their IP address. There are several distinct posters engaging with you in that thread, it is not a single poster with a vendetta. We encourage you to be more careful about what you post, it is against our policy to delete posts that users regret and that farmhand will be spoken to for violating this. Your choice to post in a way that de-anonymises you is your own problem.

No. 87736

>>87734
Ok thank you admin just giving you a heads up.

No. 87738

>>87734
Posting in a way that de-anonymizes yourself has always been a clear violation of global rules (specifically global rule 4). She should at the very least be temp banned for this meltdown, especially after spending the past 2 hours arguing and infighting with anons and accusing them of being farmhands. Pretty sure she's been talking about herself in the third person in that thread too.

No. 87739

once again asking for "twitter" and "niglefag" to get the red text treatment like victim gets

No. 87740

>>87739
I think twitter would be too annoying to redtext. A lot of milk gets posted from twitter, so I think maybe it'd send off a weird message if it was redtext.

No. 87742

>>87740
outside of the twitter thread i feel like i only ever see it used to accuse other users of being from twitter on the basis of nothing at all.

No. 87743

>>87742
I'm just thinking about all the stuff posted on cow boards. Personally, I don't think common insults should get red texted. Are we gonna red text schizo or sperg next?

No. 87744

>>87743
schizo redtext already exists, and some form variation of sperging redtext too

No. 87750

>>87720
nta but all those caps are in previous threads, you are requesting to be spoonfed if you want them reposted.

No. 87751

>>87743
its not just that accusing someone of being from twitter is common, its that its basically irrelevant and only thrown around to one-up other uses on who's the true oldfag or not. it implies that someone who is also on twitter can't possibly be a native poster, which is incorrect and leads to infights

No. 87752

Jannies please permaban me i want to be more productive next year and lolcor is addictive.(good luck out there anon, you will be missed)

No. 87753

>>87750
Why is old ass previously ppsted about milk even being brought up? Its been discussed. If anon is a new farmer then they can go read old threads. No point in reposting anything and bringing up all this again. Really shits up the thread. These newfags are insufferable.

No. 87765

ban evading retard posting porn in the money saving thread

No. 87767

Someone posting unspoilered NSFW art with nonsensical captions on /ot/

No. 87771

could a rule against posting "would"/"need her"/pointless variations be added to the OP of the tif thread? it's extremely annoying

No. 87772

So far skirby being the worst thread and worst cow is hilarious. Can we lock we thread after all this? I can't think of any milk aside from lying about photoshop kek she doesn't do anything else besides look stupid and take photos.

No. 87774

>>87772
Locking that thread would be the greatest Christmas present imaginable

No. 87775

>>87774
Ikr. She's winning both polls by a large margin.

No. 87778

Since when are we letting fandomfags determine that publicly displaying gross, obscene hentai art on one's walls is no longer milky? If it were a scroid we'd point and laugh, but suddenly, because some terminally online women who lurk here have picked this up as a character trait, we're not allowed to criticize it? I'm not even in the "omg this is pedo!!1" camp, but anons in the jirai thread get weirdly aggressively defensive over it for anyone bringing it up.

No. 87795

File: 1734973230471.gif (1.49 MB, 600x407, UncommonPessimisticBassethound…)

Troll attack

No. 87802

>>87795
It's gross for sure but even as someone who avoids this shit like the plague, it didn't even phase me. It's just annoying that these moids think they're so edgy and funny for posting these dated shock compilations. They should know better at their big age. Hell, some nonas even LIKE gay porn so they were doing some fujos a favor.

No. 87803

>>87778
Because its repetative and not interesting to see adults owning adult material. Cringey, but not milky.

No. 87804

File: 1734981382232.jpg (92.05 KB, 1143x1293, blerwight.jpg)

I don't wanna make a fuzz but this thread:

>>>/snow/1643629

Blaire White. Now I know Robbie is an ugly tranny, we all know this, but its literally all that is talked about. No milk, no just about his looks, constantly. I thought we had a rule here against nitpicking. All I suggest is that maybe some milk from time to time might be a nice change of pace besides talking about his wide shoulders or fucked up face. I mean we know, Robbie is ugly and looks nothing like a woman. Its clear at this point, no need filling over 9000 pages with that.

No. 87806

Omg don't let them have another skirby thread kek

No. 87807

>>87802
That’s what I was thinking kek. I’m glad I didn’t see anyone reacting to it when I saw it this morning though.

No. 87809

>>87804
But thats what he made his whole personality about for a long time so I'm notmsurprised anons are gonna discuss that.

Also the last post in that thread is from a month ago so not sure what the problem is as its not being bumped recently with what you say.

No. 87810

Just noticed, but thank you for implimenting report blocking in case someone doesn't refresh the page and see something is already redtext or reported prior. I think thats how I'm understanding it.

No. 87814

i'm sad the twinbuns thread got locked.. she's milky because of her reaction to and perpetuation of her internet hate, not because she reads BL manga and Asian larps, which was what the thread focused on too much and lead to the locking i believe. can't we please try again!!!?

No. 87815

Why is there a new vtuber thread in /w/? Isn't the vtuber thread usually in /m/?

No. 87817

>>87815
Because that one is for drama

No. 87818

File: 1735033288416.png (91.54 KB, 964x221, markup_1000013528.png)

Please lock any new skirby threads, no one wants to read vendettafags fat sperging and they're going as far as saying she wasn't sexually abused. We don't fucking know that. I'm not whiteknighting, she's an idiot, but this is an imageboard for women and rape apologist pick mes who refuse to integrate have no place here

No. 87821

>>87818
They allowed it?

No. 87822

>>87778
I wouldn't be surprised if the cows or cow orbiters were inside that thread kek

No. 87823

Weird weed advert spam in /w/
>>341339

No. 87824

>>87818
literally why are her threads not locked? they are so obviously made by vendettafags and jilted teenage boys who have a boner for her

No. 87825

>>87824
Right, there's only so many times you can chuckle at her outfits and knock-kneed poses kek

No. 87826

>>87821
It's confusing because if you actually look at the post being referenced that's not even remotely what's being said, there are pretty insensitive takes on it but this OP is baseless and pure seething rage. This is a screenshot from the locked thread some retard made prematurely over 2 weeks ago and I have no idea why it was glanced over, I know this is lolcow but that's too far. She's milkless and they've strayed into moid tier misogynistic bullshit. They need to just nuke the entire fucking thing at this point

No. 87827

>>87818
so many anons have complained about the skirby thread being shit, asked for it to be locked, asked why farmhands won't lock it, etc and farmhands ignore all the complaints and keep allowing the unintegrated retards to continue to constantly break rules in their shit milkless vendetta thread. for some reason the thread gets special treatment and farmhands won't answer why that is. I find it a bit odd since I know farmhands regularly read this thread and have replied to other complaints before so they're definitely seeing all the complaints about the skirby thread plus all the reports it constantly generates.

No. 87828

Genuine question is one of the m farmhands a vtfag? Or are they completely inept with vtuber culture? Why are obvious moid posts always kept up in the vtuber thread in m >>>/m/442755 this vtuber is a known pedobaiter lolishit I thought that was banned here.

No. 87829

>>87827
Not only did they ignore the complaints in this thread, they unlocked the thread with the repugnant OP. Thanks farmhands, amazing fucking job.

No. 87830

>>87828
The farmhands love lolishit why would they make an exception for vtumors?

No. 87831

>>87809
Why is everything always a debate here?
Rules are rules.
figure it out.

No. 87833

>>87829
You mean the OP with the fake pedophile accusations and milk? That's really smart of them.

No. 87834

>>87827
Maybe they think it's an effective containment thread for newfags? I don't know.

No. 87839

File: 1735093336448.png (33.46 KB, 388x632, img-2024-12-25-02-21-45.png)

loving these interactions in the skirby thread. lock it and permaban them all. please cerbmin!! for Christmas!!

No. 87845

Thank you for deleting that Skirby thread, farmhands. I really appreciate it

No. 87846

Can we have an anti-Luigi thread?

No. 87847

>>87817
I guess that makes sense as a containment thread for drama autists, but it's still a dumb idea. If it were a sustainable thread which I doubt but the jirai thread is still going so who knows it should have a different name next time (something along the lines of 'VTuber Drama General #1). The name is too similar to the thread in /m/ and the thread on /m/ is on thread #7.

No. 87848

>>87828
Sfw Loli/shota is allowed

No. 87849

>>87845
Oh thank god

No. 87851

>>87849
This is a big step in the right direction but I really hope admin considers banning any future threads. I use lolcow because I don't want to see disgusting moid shit implying someone couldn't have been raped solely because they're disliked. I can almost understand wrist slapping a fat sperg or unintegrated posting but skirbyfags are absolutely out of control with their vitriol. They would've immediately ran with that narrative if the thread wasn't deleted

No. 87852

>>87851
She just shops and lies. She never needed her own thread

No. 87853

>>87852
I agree. There's even a thread dedicated to ridiculous shooping, it wasn't warranted in the first place

No. 87856

>>87853
she used to be part of that thread until the sperging became too much / shitted up the thread. so they made a containment thread but then she really didn't have the milk to warrant that and the nitpicking and repetitive posting got even more ridiculous

No. 87857

Just wanted to say Msrry Christmas lolcow

No. 87858

File: 1735155277473.png (158.09 KB, 1080x310, markup_1000013535.png)

New thread and they're still at it despite being warned

No. 87859

>>87858
what were they warned about?

No. 87860

No more skirby

No. 87861

>>87860
sorry for being retarded but when did that happen

No. 87862

>>87859
Farmhand notice is further up in the thread. They barely changed the summary. >>87839

This has to stop. They're fucking retarded

No. 87863

Thank you for the swift response and locking that thread. Merry Christmas, sorry for shitting up meta with this on a holiday

No. 87864

Merry Christmas cerbmin and farmhands!! We love you

No. 87865

Cowtipping whiteknight in Dana's thread desperate to get her subreddit taken down and shitting it up talking about how much of a good person who takes accountability she is. Oddly enough it doesn't even seem to be Dana, but definitely some retard who got posted in the sub and wants it gone at all costs.

No. 87867

>>87778
Because it’s boring, it’s been discussed many times before as they all do it. It’s cringe, degenerate moid behavior, but it’s hardly milky anymore. It was fine when it was first discussed but we don’t need repetitive conversations over every single tapestry with breasts on wall like we are the haram police.

No. 87868

I was so scared what happened to the website why did it go down on Boxing Day whats happening who's hurting us I'm so afraid

No. 87869

>>87868
i farted

No. 87870

File: 1735234862684.jpg (149.56 KB, 720x1228, Screenshot_20241226_183949_Chr…)

>>87865
I think it might be her, its just all too suspicious that she refreshes lolcow a million times a day and suddenly there is an influx of posts whiteknighting her

No. 87871

>>87868
Websites go down sometimes, and it was a short outage at that. It's gonna be okay, anon

No. 87873

File: 1735243618967.png (367.88 KB, 1608x850, Screenshot 2024-12-26 at 3.03.…)

>>87870
Farmhands deleted that post but they need to look into this issue more. Are these posts coming from the same IP(s)?

No. 87874

>>87870
I reckon it’s her too. All I want for Christmas is for our benevolent farmhands to red text her posts: Please and thank you!

No. 87875

I love all the improvements to the site lately but the way posting is so quick without any loading always makes me nervous, because it used to only be like that when a ban message comes next kek.

No. 87879

Assmad gay porn spam from some seething vpnfag tranny faggot in the Luigi husbando thread mods pls kill.

No. 87881

>>87879
I wanted to check this hellsite after a few days and I was greeted with gay porn. I need eye bleach

No. 87882

Is the gay porn spam supposed to bother us or…? Sure I reported it out of principle but spamming dicks in the thirst thread is such an odd choice.

No. 87883

>>87882
Honestly, gay porn is funny if anything

No. 87884

>>87882
Kek probably some tryhard teenager thinking he’s scaring us with the tamest shit ever

No. 87885

>>87882
the same retard is spamming the luigi threads on CC as well. its some assmad scrote who thinks that imageboard users will be phased in any way by gay porn lol. what a retard. my favourite part is that when the jannies clean it up its all deleted instantly, but he probably spent ages manually setting up the spam. CRINGE

No. 87890

>>87885
He's been having a meltdown on CC for about 2 hours straight at this point. We need to keep this VPN ban forever. Please.

No. 87891

File: 1735271076237.png (1.26 MB, 690x1252, 1735235068205.png)

can we have a dana post history reveal please farmhands? it would be the most beautiful christmas gift.

No. 87894

new mods are RETARDED!!!! i’ve been on this site since 2019, why are my saged posts being redtexted with “learn2integrate” when i’m staying on topic and discussing a cow in the thread??? why are you allowing obviously underage posters to shit up all the boards while being trigger happy and banning ppl who actually follow the rules?

No. 87896

>>87891
Pretty please with a cherry on top

No. 87897

>>87894
>since 2019
>still not integrated
Just integrate.

No. 87900

Okay I reported it already but that was hours ago - there is a huge shit flinging competition in the Confessions thread on /ot/, can you like ban these people? It's been going on for 20+ hours. Please.

No. 87902

can we ban comments in danas thread that can be summarized as lc vs reddit. It adds virtually nothing to the thread. if anons are unable to understand their opinions are irrelevant there they cab be directed to the reddit hate thread.

No. 87903

File: 1735350477214.jpeg (265.4 KB, 799x1212, IMG_6915.jpeg)

can you do somethjng about the vivziepop obsessed retard with the recognisable typing quirk shitting /m/ up with her autism? thx

No. 87916

File: 1735371483096.png (324.42 KB, 640x529, 1735345563738.png)

Theres someone weird going around in the /a/ and /vt/ threads…farmhands need to curb the loliposting..especially of known pedoshit

No. 87919

>>87916
ot but does this meme pre-date the Noticing book right wing tards were talking about so much recently (actually, months ago but I think it was 2024)?

No. 87923

Can the mod ban the most fucking obvious troons in the rate my art thread in m already

No. 87924

File: 1735406808584.jpeg (153.24 KB, 828x438, IMG_6925.jpeg)

>>87923
came here to post this, seriously jannies the mf goes nya

No. 87925


No. 87927

I've noticed an influx of cowtipping across all cow boards, even if that mean reposting milk publicly where cows exist. This is ruining organic flow and really stiffling the threads.

No. 87930

Please /m/ods give the weird typing quirk anon a punctuation lesson. I legitimately think she's low functioning.

No. 87933

trainfags shittng up the pokemon thread again

No. 87935

>>87933
it's literally 3 posts

No. 87937

>>87935
it's the mindset. one offhand mention and the trainautists immediateky go "omg we're gonna post them to spite you!!! fucking insufferable. there are husbando retarded shitposting threads for that

No. 87944

Can a farmhand just sit in the vent thread for a while and delete all of the bp spergs posts as they come in? She's been going on a tirade for 4+ hours now and the bans aren't working.

No. 87945

>>87933
Anons posting things you don’t like isn’t a bannable offence.

No. 87946

File: 1735518675687.jpeg (774.9 KB, 828x1370, IMG_6943.jpeg)

>>87930
agreed, she's a complete retard and her posts really stand out. isn't vivzieslop supposed to be a contained topic anyway?

No. 87947

>>87945
>Anons posting things you don’t like isn’t a bannable offence.
here, yes it is

No. 87949

File: 1735546893486.jpeg (997.52 KB, 1170x1972, IMG_2598.jpeg)

Dark mode has unreadable link color, some modifications would be great

No. 87950

Some "anon" on /g/ ugly thread posted her face and has been shitting up the thread for a few hours now and the post is still not deleted. I reported it and nothing happened.
>>>/g/461652

No. 87951

>>87950
she do look ugly though

No. 87952

>>87951
True but self-posting is against the rules

No. 87953

>>87952
this. what a retard

No. 87956

>>87952
Do nu-jannies even care, I remember when anons were posting their nudes they barely did anything besides a hours late red text

No. 87959

File: 1735569723226.png (293.53 KB, 2200x872, Screenshot 2024-12-30 at 9.40.…)

>>87949
If you use the darkcow style, there isn't a problem with the link color.

No. 87960

can a farmhand do something about the lolita cow thread on /w/ being derailed and used as a general discussion thread by tourists? they're arguing about makeup, how chinese and japanese lolitas dress, and other off topic things (completely unrelated to any cows or milk) instead of taking it to the general lolita fashion thread on /g/ or using /cgl/.

No. 87961

>>87956
You mean people who found random photos online weren't removed? Some posts aren't actual people posting themselves, but random people they find. Don't be so gullible.

No. 87962

File: 1735581017471.png (296.2 KB, 1080x884, Screenshot_20241230_224911_Fir…)

>response to a woman being burned alive
why is this shit not redtexted as bait

No. 87964

>>87962
They might be the same TIF sperg from another thread honestly

No. 87965

File: 1735582178110.png (9.3 KB, 547x146, uwu.png)

Using uwu as an adjective should not merit a redtext. I know emojis generally are banned but it's often not being used as an emoji. When it's used as an adjective (picrel) it's clearly referencing a cow's weeaboo tendencies and smug self-satisfaction with how cute and perfect they believe themselves to be. I saw this in Jill's thread and was baffled as to why the farmhands cracked down on this.

No. 87966

>>87965
I think it should. If you can't even think up a real word to describe a cow, then you don't sound intelligent enough to be posting. Technically it's an emoji.

No. 87967

>>87965
>I know emojis generally are banned but it's often not being used as an emoji.
It is an emoticon, not an emoji. Emoticons and emojis have been banned here for a long time, not using them is part of integration.
>When it's used as an adjective
An emoticon can't be an adjective. If you want to reference the cows' weeaboo tendencies or smug self-satisfaction, use those words instead, not an emoticon.

Using emoticons "ironically" is still using emoticons.

>>87966
Agreed.

No. 87968

>>87967
I remember anons just using this to describe random things Venus would do and it just shits up the thread. It doesn't add context either. The excuse will be that it's like a state of mind, but how hard is it to say 'Exactly, Jillian gets to be an infantilized baby who is sunshine and rainbows and cartoons' instead? I think there is a lack of vocabulary for posters.

No. 87969

>>87961
what a weird tinfoil

No. 87970

>>87961
Well I checked back and they actually were removed, ig I misremembered

No. 87971

>>87969
Posting someone else on imageboards and larping it's you has been a thing for decades even back in chatrooms. It's not tinfoil.

No. 87976

Fag spamming fag porn

No. 87978

The porn should remind me why I shouldn't be scrolling on lolcow absent mindedly, it could have easily been cp and my ass would have scrolled right by it with my eyes glued to the screen

No. 87980

>>87978

That exact thing has happened many times on here. I remember opening up this site one day and seeing images of literal baby rape. Those horrifying images are forever burned into my head. Can you even imagine posting that shit just to get a rise out of people?

No. 87982

>>87980
I've only seen it happen twice and one time you couldn't really make out what was happening thankfully. Whoever did this(elaine or some ugly fucking moid from another imageboard) should kill themselves, horrifying. Imagine not only seeking out that type of content but saving it to your device

No. 87984

>>87970
the ones in the 'celebration of our natural state' thread in /g/ are still up

No. 87985

>>87978
This has happened to me before and I'm still a little shaken by it, to be honest. I hope whoever posted it fails their future suicide attempt and lives in agony for the rest of their life.

No. 87986

>>87978
>>87980
Reminds me of the time some triggered troon was posting gore of teen girls saying this is what trannies were gonna do to us and those images are also burned into my head. I peaked that day and became a full blown terf.

No. 87992

Can one of you change the recent vent thread pic because it's pissing me off I don't wanna spend the next 3 days looking at that lame bad-render horror movie knockoff shit for the next 6 days. Please as a Christmas gift to me can you just change the pic to something normal and not retarded

No. 87993

>>87992
Samefag but like 5 different anons agreed with me alredy please change the thread pic for that thread it will ruint he next week for me and lc is my life so it will baically ruin my life PLEASE farmhands

No. 87995

I feel like baiters and infighters have been camping the lesbian thread for a few days. Are longer bans being handed out now to repeat offenders? Or are there really that many distinct anons who keep taking the bait? I swear there's like 20 people max in the thread.

No. 87996

>>87984
Tbf those do look fake and cropped from some where, the nudes anons posted on the unpopular opinions thread had them holding paper signs with LC on it

No. 87997

File: 1735626920976.jpg (1.95 MB, 3056x4732, 1735340894978.jpg)

>>87923
>>87924
It's fucking horseshit that an anon got redtexted for "troonfoiling" when the anon she replied to posted the absolute trooniest piece of non-fetish art I've ever seen. It's a fucking cat girl holding an artistically detailed gun, of course a moid drew it. I clocked him as a moid before I read a single word he said. Did the farmhand not bother to look at the IP's (probably short) post history? She should send that anon a fuckin written apology and an edible arrangement after gaslighting her like that.

No. 88000

the new vent thread picture is so disgusting to look at. could it at least get spoilered? i thought we were getting raided at first glance and i wasn't the only one who thought so

No. 88001

>>87965
Using uwu is a lolcow classic that has been used to describe cows for a long time, dunno why newfag farmhands are banning it now

No. 88002

>>88001
>Using uwu is a lolcow classic that has been used to describe cows for a long time
Can you post any examples that are from before 2020?

No. 88005

File: 1735641029858.jpg (141.51 KB, 1080x366, tada.jpg)

>>88002
NTA, here's one from seven years ago. From a /snow/ thread.

No. 88006

>>88002
uwu has been around for the longest time, this is the weirdest hill to die on

No. 88007

File: 1735641586139.jpg (140.53 KB, 711x740, Screenshot_20241231-014728_Chr…)

>>88002
Nta but I remember seeing it first being used around 2017/18 on here

No. 88008

>>88002
Lmao, shoe0nhead was literally named shuwu here.

No. 88009

>>87965
the farmhands are fickle with this one, sometimes they let it slide and sometimes they don't. every time you use an emoticon you risk a ban, it is what it is.

somewhere there is a compilation of anons who were banned for using the unicode heart, it's funny it's not that serious.

No. 88011

I've been banned for unknown reason even though i just lurk on lolcow. sent an email to appeal my ban but nothing happend. why?

No. 88015

>>87965
>>88001
>>87967
>>88009
I've used "uwu" many times without a ban or redtext, but it's always either in quotes or greentext. It's just a facetious way to describe someone who is cutesy in an obnoxiously smug, Tumblr-y way. Obviously if someone were using it sincerely, that would warrant a ban, but I never see it used that way here anyway.

No. 88016

File: 1735660763688.gif (3.85 MB, 498x498, 1000003568.gif)

>>88000
thank you, farmhands!

No. 88019

File: 1735665267780.png (26.65 KB, 1027x103, evidence 1.png)

>>88005
I've noticed a lot of people from Anglo countries are poisoned by the common law systems that they grew up in.

LC moderation is based on civil law, not common law.

I can go back through the catalog and look at ancient threads and see examples like picrel. The fact that these instances where emoticons aren't banned exist doesn't negate the fact that the rule is "no emoticons or emojis." Just because there are a few examples of emoticons in old threads, doesn't mean that we can use those as reasoning for fighting the laws of our land. When you see posts with emoticons that haven't been banned, it's more like nobody reported them or that they were banned without a redtext.

No. 88022

>>88019
uwu isn't used as an emoji here it's used ironically as a word, like when people say "eksdee" in real life to refer to "xD".(emojis are emoticons, it's like a square and rectangle situation) also uwu is used as a word by egirls unironically so it's funny to use it ironically as a joke. also the rest of your post is braindead and incorrect usage of the terms common/civil law.

No. 88023

>>88022
Too bad. If anons are using it to bypass the rules, crack down on the rules. It's a sign of low IQ to not be able to say what you mean outside of "uwu wuw" It's a sound ffs.

No. 88024

>>88022
>like when people say "eksdee" in real life
I refuse to believe that this happens in real life. I'm too misanthropic as it is, I don't need to add more fuel to that fire.
>also the rest of your post is braindead
You cannot call someone brain-dead if you actually speak the gibberish "eksdee" in real life or associate with those that do.

No. 88025

>>88011
You can do an appeal on the van page. You don't have to email. Also were you permabanned because you're posting just fine.

No. 88027

>>88024
you must be esl if you don't know what ironic means.

No. 88028

>>88027
I know what ironic means. I reject what you think ironic means.

Can you "ironically" enjoy ice cream? Can you sit there and eat ice cream and "ironically" think it's tasty? No, you can't.

Can you "ironically" a-log? Can you "ironically" break the rules? Would you be able to get out of a murder case by saying you killed the person "ironically?" Think about it for a minute.

I'm so tired of people masking their bullshit behind "irony." No, you can't use emoticons "ironically." You can't do something "ironically." Irony isn't a cop out, it's not an excuse. There is no way to "ironically" break the rules, or circumvent them either.

No. 88029

>>87965
Since when was this a banable offence when it’s practically part of the board culture here and used ironically all the time by a good portion of farmers and never gets red texted when used to poke fun at weeb cows.

>>88028
Nayrt but you are unironically an autistic retard. Until recent history they locked people like you in padded cells.

No. 88030

>>88029
>I'm an autistic retard
>On the autistic retard website
Ohh noooo you caught me!! Anyway emoticons and emojis are banned, that means even using them ironically is banned. It's been like that since forever stop trying to hijack the site to make it more friendly to twitards and tiktokfags.

No. 88032

>>88030
Except it hasn’t been like that forever for that specific word. Stop sperging out your ass with paragraphs on civil law, ice cream and ironic murders, bootlicker, you sound schizo kek

No. 88033

>>88032
Stay seething because you wanna use emoticons.

No. 88038

>>88032
Cry more. Sorry to say that they are now sticking to their own rules instead of letting annoying "uwu"s slide. I welcome it. Keep these discord and tumblr weebs out. This shouldn't been enforced years ago.

No. 88039

>>88005
>>88007
Thanks, it’s good to know that anons weren’t just bullshiting. It’s become more common for anons to claim that something is ‘a part of lolcow culture’ without any proof. Although I don’t think that an exception to the emoji ban should be made.

No. 88042

>>88025
Thanks. I'm not sure if i'm permabanned but when I enter lolcow site all the text are in reverse? i've never been banned before?

No. 88043

>>87950
What did she look like?

No. 88045

File: 1735708628491.jpeg (164.15 KB, 720x960, IMG_7880.jpeg)


No. 88047

>>88045
I swear I remember this face from somewhere. I don't think it's a nona.

Or maybe she's posted herself before.

No. 88048

>>88045
Pretty sure that's a girl in jillians confetti club group. Probably a cruel larp.

No. 88049

>>88045
Was this seriously the photo posted? This does feel like a larp like >>88048 said. No one has a screencap?

No. 88050

>>88049
no it's not, her face was rounder and with darker hair. no dye or weird clothes. i have it but don't want to get banned since i've seen anons banned for reposting self posts before

No. 88053

>>88052
Why would you even save that. Fucking weird. Anyway not ugly imo just fat and ungroomed. No right to mope about self inflicted ugly.

No. 88054

>>88052
She looks kinda cute

No. 88055

>>88053
>Why would you even save that
Because I knew other people would ask for it

No. 88056

>>88055
I'm >>88043 Thank you for showing. You can delete it now so you don't get banned kek.

No. 88061

File: 1735721473538.png (169.27 KB, 1170x1000, no password .png)

Mods, we enter our own passwords in the password field now?

No. 88064

File: 1735722552413.jpeg (52.25 KB, 300x317, IMG_4724.jpeg)


No. 88065

>>88061
I've had this randomly happen throughout the years, I'm not sure what causes it to happen but it randomly fixes itself

No. 88067

>>87997
ot but I'm not up on troon and furry trends, why does this thing have two tails

No. 88077

>>88067
Nekomata

No. 88078

Why do we have a jungle theme but no cow/farm theme? The fuck is up with that?

No. 88080

>>88064
>VPN ban is turned off
>This pic is immediately posted
You're not slick lol

No. 88088

>>88078
well calm down

No. 88098

This Googledoc farmer keeps outing herself. She's been caught selfposting before and they haven't seemed to be integrated at all since the last thread. I thought they were put out to pasture before? >>>/w/341760

No. 88100

>>88098
>I thought they were put out to pasture before?
Well now the VPN ban is gone so bans are meaningless again kek

No. 88102

>>88100
I don't think this poster is using a VPN for majority of their posting. They seem far too retarded and

they

type

like this. I mean, come on.

No. 88108

Many of the latest posts in the opinions on cows thread do not discuss cows at all. Instead, it's just complaining about anons without any specific cow mentioned. How is that on topic? The thread is for opinions on cows. Now they're complaining about threads and throwing around the "hasn't been milky in years" shit.

Can we not have a separate thread for these posters to lament and infight about anons? It really ruins this thread to have posts about vague "anons." It's just bait.
>>>/ot/2326880
>>>/ot/2327015
>>>/ot/2327661 (bait, calling anons shitposters for having other opinions)
>>>/ot/2327874
>>>/ot/2328129 (baiting with Taylor R thread, complaining about the thread)

No. 88109

>>88108
I don't think you know what bait is

No. 88111

The retards always calling on mommy and daddy farmhands to fight their battles for them cracks me up, it’s so blatantly obvious a bunch of children use this website now kek

No. 88120

Are farmhands going to unlock >>>/m/443789 or should I just make a new thread? The previous one hit 1200 now so its fine

No. 88134

>>88078
You raise a good point. We need a cute cow farm theme ASAP

No. 88135

adminnnn im getting the “you do not appear to be banned” thing over and over despite clearing cookies

No. 88138

>>88111
Where

No. 88140

>>88108
Just because you're offended doesn't mean something is bait.

No. 88141

>>88111
So why you on a site with a bunch of children then?

No. 88142

We do need to do something about the amount of anons who love spoonfeeding and do no amount of lurking. Seeing the anons ask what cerbmin is, and the anons autistic enough to spoonfeed what jc is abysmal.

No. 88143

>>88142
I report them for being newfags. Swear to God they don't know anything about IBs. These are the retards that spawn in whenever LC is mentioned on TT.

No. 88144

File: 1735773782815.jpg (40.05 KB, 750x422, CLE-3-Blog-8.jpg)

mods they're racefagging in unpopular opinions…

No. 88150

Racebait is still ongoing in unpopular opinions. we truly need permananent hellmas

No. 88156

Almost the entirety of the gioyc thread is now spamposts by that mentally ill schizo spammer that hd evaded like a dozen perma bans. Why? Literally scrolling up its nearly every single post. That person needs psychiatric intervention.

No. 88160

>>88156
This is what I mean by forcing certain threads to ban vpn like amerifag did

No. 88161

>>88156
I'm not trying to be snarky, but who even reads the GIOYC thread

No. 88163

>>88156
So is the letter thread on CC.

No. 88165

>>88161
That doesn't mean the schizo should be allowed to have full reign and their own thread kek. I browse it casually occasionally and not only is almost every post clearly theirs (no debate either, they also use names constantly and even post photos at times - hard to miss) but whenever someone else posts they chimp out and pretend every single post is a love letter to them. Usually schizo spammers get deleted, but not this one for some reason.

No. 88166

>>88160
But they spamposted consistently during the VPN ban, it means nothing. They just reset their router or delete and reinstall their mobile browser. VPN banning doesn't do nearly as much as newfags seem to believe.

No. 88168

>>88166
i love how vpntards switch it up all the time kek in no particular order its been -
>banning vpns would destroy the site!
>banning vpns is what troons want!
>banning vpns prevents women in dictatorships from posting!
>banning vpns just so the farmhands can dox us!
>banning vpns doesnt solve anything its all newfags!
>banning vpns is fascist!
and none of its true lol. its just constant bullshit. they throw everything they can at the wall to try and make it seem like vpns are a necessity instead of just a ban evasion tool.

No. 88172

>>88168
But it's true. The site is poorly moderated because it's being kept barely functional by a handful of weird scrotes and the VPN ban is moreso an avenue of skirting moderation even further. I don't care either way, the site is unbearable now regardless.

No. 88182

>>88168
its so pathetically obvious. its like a child throwing a temper tantrum

No. 88184

I think we should remove the image recovery pin on /ot/ now, or it will end up being there forever. The last 627 images are from a 4 year old dress up game thread and it is extremely unlikely that any of those images will be recovered. Those images are all unique user generated images that would only be available to that user and the chances of anons still having those images saved on their devices is very, very low.

No. 88190

>>88184
I agree with your premise but I think we should keep the thread pin. I like being greeted by the cow picture when I click on /ot/, it's rustic and pastoral and it reminds me about the heart of this website and brings me comfort.

No. 88191

>>88184
I'm leaning towards agreeing. If they weren't recovered by now, then just keep the thread for if anons find something.

No. 88196

Are cowtippers permabanned?

No. 88198

>>88196
when VPNs are allowed, nobody can be permabanned

No. 88210

can't seem to post tiktok anymore

No. 88211

Can something be done about the situation on /g/ right now?

No. 88212

tards baiting in gs thread, desperately trying to get it taken down I would assume

No. 88216

Since when is the use of "uwu" considered an emoji? At this point it's become a word of its own, pronounced "ooh-woo"

No. 88218

>>88216
Are you being serious rn

No. 88223

>>88216
I'm so glad they are cracking down on this. Finally.

No. 88237

can mods delete the AMWF bait/racebait in the Asian Girl Problems thread on /g. that shit doesn't need to stay up

No. 88240

I don't get why the advice thread isn't on /ot/, it belongs there better for traction as well

No. 88241

>>88216
>>88218
Yeah someone else brought it up too >>87965 Considering it’s slang that’s been used frequently for the past few years and not even registered as a face anymore, I’m unsure why jannies now have a sudden hate boner for it as it’s been used frequently to mock weeb and smoll bean cows for YEARS.

No. 88242

>>88240
I don't get why it's so hard to click on a button at the top to bring you to a different board and posting your request for advice there. Why are /ot/fags afraid to use the other boards?

>>88241
It's an emoji. Emoji's are banned. I don't know why you can't wrap your head around it.

No. 88244

>>88242
Please explain it to me again nonnie, me so stupid me need spoonfeed. Can’t you fucking read, no one uses it as an emoji or to personalityfag. If multiple people are bringing it up then multiple active posters do not register it as an emoji, same as people using the word triggered not for the purpose it was initially intended for. And if you want to be real autistic about it, it’s an emoticon not an emoji retard.

No. 88245

>>88244
The fact that you went so aggro about it tells me all I need to know about you lol

No. 88246

File: 1735920047870.jpeg (718.65 KB, 1179x1338, IMG_6408.jpeg)

You’re allowed to vent about your relationship in the relationship thread on /g/, it just hasn’t been spelled out in the OP in the recent ones. If you go back a couple threads you can see it was in the OP that it was okay to vent >>>/g/358356 and if you read the threads nonas vent all the time

No. 88251

>>88244
>>88241
>>88244
All this from the addy thread, right? Get over it and it is not slang. Slang for what, a whole vibe? "UwU" is an emoji and has always been used as such. Anons attributing it towards proper posting are just mad it wasn't enforced more heavily prior. It should've always been bannable. If you're using it in leiu of writing a full sentence, you deserve to be banned.

No. 88255

O_o UwU -_- OwO

these all are emojis. uwu is one of them, i placed it amongst the others to get the point across. expand your vocabulary and find another word to use instead of bitching like a stunted idiot.

No. 88257

Bring back the VPN ban on ot already it was way better with that enforced

No. 88258

>>88251
No. I mentioned uwu because it was from a thread on /ot/. And yes uwu is a slang whether you like it or not.

No. 88261

>>88255
>>88251
You newfags are the reason for the decay of this website.

No. 88262

>>88258
For? Do you know what slang is?

No. 88265

Obvious maleposting is shitting up the alt right carnivore thread.

No. 88266

File: 1735933844757.jpeg (65.8 KB, 1170x315, IMG_4772.jpeg)

>>88262
It started off as a cute face emoticon (emoji’s are actual graphics on iphones/android etc, emoticons are typed symbols or letters that together form faces) but due to the excessive use of it in kawaii e-girl culture as an emoticon it became a noise oowooh, which then started being used as slang pronounced as oowooh to mock kawaii e-girls and NLOGs who think they are cute e.g. Shuwu which was coined like 6 years ago >>>/snow/584214 and you can see every shoe thread has used the uwu face excessively see picrel so it’s not like it’s tiktokfags who have hijacked LC and it was always illegal. Have you been living under a rock? The context in which the uwu face is used is what matters, which I understand is hard for some autismos

No. 88271

>>88266
>you can see every shoe thread has used the uwu face excessively see picrel so it’s not like it’s tiktokfags who have hijacked LC
The people who are defending the "uwu is an emoticon!!1!" stance are the TikTokfags, most likely /ot/fags who didn't even realize that the gossip boards existed, kek
And yes, while it technically is an emoticon, context matters. There's a difference between someone posting "Going in for a manipedi uwu" on some thread in /ot/ and someone using it in an obvious derisive or mocking manner as is established on the cow boards.

No. 88273

>>88271
I couldn’t agree more. The fact they are trying to cape so hard for technically the rules yet said >>88251
>All this from the addy thread, right?
does lead me to believe that they are indeed a newfag who took learn2integrate to heart. We have Shuwu, not to mention 158 Shay threads, 150 MtF threads all using uwu excessively as ironic slang to convey a message and you’re quoting the Addy thread in snow as the source of the uwu usage and calling it an emoji? uwu is at this point part of LC culture on the cow boards to laugh at them and has been for at least 7 years.

No. 88275

File: 1735939287687.png (218.52 KB, 776x461, emoticons.png)

>>88266
Definitely, these newfags from TikTok really think that emoticons were ever banned here?? How retarded D:< ! Emoticons and emojis have ALWAYS been allowed on <3 Lolcow <3, take picrel for example :') Those were the GOOD OL DAYS! ! Never until 2024 have emoticons been such a contentious issue 。°(°.◜ᯅ◝°)°。 , probably because only this year did newfags start using this website and shitting it up with their brainless TikTok ideas xD . Emoticons have ALWAYS been encouraged here ÓwÒ ! How else would we express ourselves 「(‘◉⌓◉’) ???? Through words?!!?! ROFLCOPTER!!!! Maybe these newfaggot TikTokers should go back to their GAY APP and leave us alone ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ See the pic!! It has lot of emoticons that mean emoticons was ALLWAYS aloud :D Dont let the TRANNY JANNIES GASLIGHT U!! This pic is PROVE that emoticons are part of our culture :)))

⡴⠒⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⠉⠳⡆⠀
⣇⠰⠉⢙⡄⠀⠀⣴⠖⢦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠁⠙⡆
⠘⡇⢠⠞⠉⠙⣾⠃⢀⡼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⡀⠄⢷⣄⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⠒⠲⡄⠀⣏⣆⣀⡍
⠀⢠⡏⠀⡤⠒⠃⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⠾⠛⡁⠀⠀⢀⣈⡉⠙⠳⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⣇⡼⢋⠀⠀⢱
⠀⠘⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⡴⢋⡣⠊⡩⠋⠀⠀⠀⠣⡉⠲⣄⠀⠙⢆⠀⠀⠀⣸⠀⢉⠀⢀⠿⠀⢸
⠀⠀⠸⡄⠀⠈⢳⣄⡇⠀⠀⢀⡞⠀⠈⠀⢀⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢧⠀⠀⢳⣰⠁⠀⠀⠀⣠⠃
⠀⠀⠀⠘⢄⣀⣸⠃⠀⠀⠀⡸⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠈⣇⠀⠀⠙⢄⣀⠤⠚⠁⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⢹⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⢘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠁⠀⠉⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⣼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⡀⣸⣿⣿⠟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣿⡀⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠹⠿⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢿⡿⠁⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⣤⣞⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢢⣀⣠⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠲⢤⣀⣀⠀⢀⣀⣀⠤⠒⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

That emoticon is my face right now because of all this DRAMA xD I just want to RAWR at these newfags(retard)

No. 88278

>>88266
So you agree it's root is still emoticon

No. 88280

>>88275
Nice bait but you’re just proving my point. All those read as emoticons/personalityfagging, uwu never has here because of the context it is used in cow threads. It was not the face the farmer was making when posting, it was the expression of the cow being posted about. As much as you’re trying to bait I hope you don’t get a ban nonnie, because I understand the mocking context you are using it in because I’m not neurodivergent, though it was a little overkill at the end so I suggest you take your meds

>>88278
The root of gay is happy, the root of faggot is a bundle of sticks… It’s almost like language changes with time depending on the context

No. 88281

>>88280
Unfortunately, I adopt the idea of banning it due to the fact that newfags have seen it and now overuse it. Unfortunately a good thing comes to a halt when people take advantage of using it to describe a cow. However, I think using it in context matters. If you are talking about a cow in post about how she thinks she is "uwu smol" and she has said this, that shouldn't be banned. That is using the cow's language against her. If anons are going out of their way to personally call the cow "uwu" in any form, I think that's bannable. If you cannot come up with some better description than "uwu" you shouldn't be posting. It makes newfags think that it's a go-to. Sorry a group ruins it for everyone.

No. 88283

>>88275
obvious satire but banned anyway. when the rules clash with jokey posts like this it never fails to make me laugh. never change, farmhands, I mean it. (I actually mean it, I would have banned that post too but I probably would have made the red text "emojis")

No. 88284

Can "baitfoiling" be a bannable offense? There's always an anon itching to call anything they disagree with or dislike "bait".

No. 88285

File: 1735943261474.jpeg (1.07 MB, 1475x1776, IMG_0764.jpeg)


No. 88288


No. 88289


No. 88292

>>88283
Here's an example of someone using it in emoji form. >>>/ot/1995103

No. 88293

File: 1735950701721.jpg (801.4 KB, 1080x1677, 0250.jpg)

>>88271
I have actually seen it be banned in the context of making fun of a cow recently, picrel is in the Ethel Cain thread, this was the only one of two posts that were banned for using emojis and uwu has been used more recently in that thread and had not been banned, so really inconsistent there. I wish there was more clarification on this.

No. 88294

>>88293
The context is sometimes people report it and sometimes they don't. Mods don't sit in threads and moderate them, they just respond to reports. That's why sometimes emojis are banned and sometimes they aren't. It's simple/

No. 88297

(You) have waaay too much time on your hands.

No. 88298

>>88294
Nta but this is why it's being enforced randomly. If someone isn't seeing your post or scrolling by it isn't going to be reported. It's not the mods fault for not moderating, it's people for not equally reporting.

No. 88299

Dana is in her thread on /snow/ having a melt down can you stop her please

No. 88300

File: 1735964554268.png (29.15 KB, 650x114, in the same city.png)

Farmhands, are you sure it wasn't Dana posting?

I noticed a lot of typing quirks in the spergout, like "minor child," "loosing," and "gum up," that Dana likes to use a lot.

How do you figure out if it's really the cow herself or just someone else close by? That's sort of rhetorical, I get that you'd already have Dana's home IP because she's been banned before, but do you think she could have used her cell data or something else of that sort?

Or was this redtext just a clever joke and I was too autistic to get it?

No. 88304

>>88300
Anon… That's definitely a joke by the farmhand because the poster said "not Dana" when it's obviously Dana

No. 88305

Heterophobicdyke is on the loose in the radfem cows thread again now that the VPN ban is lifted

No. 88306

>>88300
>>88304
It looks like the only ban in thread too which likely means it was just the one person (not dana! kek) spam WKing too. She's probably going to be at it tenfold in the next thread.

No. 88311

>>88300
farmhands need to out dana's posting history already please

No. 88312

Is there any way to stop retards from posting literal tabloid-tier shit in celebricows? They're conflating the thead with general celebrity discussion. Probably not beyond reporting/modding but it's getting progressively worse each thread.

No. 88313

File: 1735996181310.jpeg (152.73 KB, 828x844, IMG_7031.jpeg)

Pls do something about the unintegrated reddit faggots who shit up /snow/ blogging anout their pathetic lives
especially this retard in dana's thread

No. 88314

>>88312
Trump-chan making 5 posts of the same zoomed/cropped images for every non-story from 2 years ago is what floods most of the threads imo. Not sure if it's the same poster that can't figure out hyperlinks also. They've been at it for well over a year, if not two. I'm not sure if any of it is worth reporting due to the volume of spam and because it's been ignored for a while now.

No. 88315

Some retard posted a duplicate of Dana’s thread >>2073891 here >>2073939 which needs to be deleted / closed please.

No. 88316

>>88313
Oh god yes I am so bored of these unintegrated freaks blogging like we give a shit that they’re “really pleased actually that I didn’t attend college”: go cope somewhere else, faggot.

No. 88318

>>88313
There's a post after this with "I'm the OP" in place of ayrt that includes a TLDR. Why do they even bother, just go back to your dogshit snark reddit. Next they'll be calling her "they" and whining about how "no one shud be misgendered!"

No. 88320

>>88318
I wrote that because I wrote the original post that got the Redditard blogging and deleting about how they’re so glad they didn’t go to college. I didn’t write that I was the ayrt because I was not the ayrt. Hope this helps.

No. 88321

A white knight is in the radfem cows thread sperging about how menalez should file a lolsuit because we discussed things she posted as a minor. They've been at it for the last half an hour

No. 88323

>>88320
Then use nayrt and don't out yourself with a fucking TLDR on an imageboard, you sped. Go back

No. 88326

Mods please clean up the radfem thread it's actually unbearable to read because of all the infighting

No. 88334

problem with posting tiktoks

No. 88336

"Invalid codec" error when trying to post .mp4 files, and when I convert them to .mov, I get a system error

No. 88339

News stories that fuck with you on ot is just an endless discussion about race/islam recently

No. 88340

>>88339
So professional to italicize the title of the thread. I commend you.

No. 88341

Can we get thread pinning as a feature in 2025 please

No. 88342

Please clean up Dana sinnabbunys thread. Whiteknights including Dana herself have been shitting up the thread since yesterday and I can't believe only one or two posts were redtexted, they're still going.

No. 88343

>>88342
Usually we let cows sperg. Banning them is a last ditch thing. It's milk to see them spiral on lolcow

No. 88348

The fact that every race gets to have a thread in /g/ except whites is wack.

White women:

- Suffer from the same kind of fetishization as Asian women while being stereotyped as stupider, lazier and fatter

-Get attacked for racemixing. Nothing pisses everyone off more than a white woman/ black man relationship, which is why there was an entire website dedicated to shaming white women who do it (coalfax)

-are disproportionately affected by certain types of tradfaggotry like mormonism, eastern orthodoxy and orthodox judaism

-are disproportionately targeted by elite sex pests (just look at Jeffrey Epstein's or Harvey Weinstein's victim lists)

- Are disproportionately affected by health problems like opioid addiction, osteoporosis and skin cancer

-Get called racial slurs

-Get murdered for their skin color (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra_murders)

- Are the main target of dumb blonde jokes, bimbo stereotypes, dogfucker jokes, nazi stereotypes and redneck jokes

-Are stereotyped as rich, which sucks for the ones who aren't. Imagine getting called privileged when you're a sex slave trapped in a Moldovan slum

-Get weird comments about their hair and eyes when they are in places where they are minorities

-Get called oppressors with no culture even if they come from oppressed cultures like the Irish or the Basques

- Are told to shut up and take it when moids of color target them (see: the Pakistani rape gang problem in England, the 2016 rape-a-thon in Cologne, Eldridge Cleaver's admission of racially targeted rapes in his book Soul on Ice)

-Are told to shut up and take it when they are race swapped in media, even when it's historical figures getting their story rewritten. What's up with the weird obsession some people have with Cleopatra being black? Homegirl was Greek.(unintegrated bait)

No. 88349

>>88348
You're reaching so hard to be victim

No. 88350

>>88348
There’s no reason not to have one when every other race gets one, and all those threads have racebait in them as well, so either blanket ban them or let this one exist. The ‘no heckin race mention’ rules only exist because Mexican janitor burritomin was butthurt about privileged white women btw, thoughts I’d remind everyone

No. 88351

>>88348
I wouldn’t use the thread so I hope they don’t allow it. One more thread I’ll have to hide if they do. The other race threads just attract trolling, you can’t even read them because half the posts are made by a schizophrenic “transracial” TIM (not even exaggerating that actually happened)

No. 88352

can't believe some of you are still responding to the most obvious bait in existence, half the stuff listed isn't even exclusive to one race

No. 88353

>>88351
Then those threads should be banned

No. 88359

File: 1736091787207.gif (907.84 KB, 200x148, IMG_6446.gif)


No. 88360

There is a milklet making vendetta threads in snow >>>/snow/2074443. Also, the rules as listed at https://lolcow.farm/rules don't actually say anything about sageing or emoji use. A blurb about sageing and emojis where newfags will definitely see it may curb some unintegrated behaviors.

No. 88363

>>88350
>burritomin
kek I swear every time I see some name made up for a jannie I laugh at how ridiculous it is

No. 88364

File: 1736095648891.jpeg (135.83 KB, 1242x432, IMG_8062.jpeg)

>>88360
The no emoticons rule is on the info page, where the sage info is too. If anything, you sound like a newfag.
>milklet
Jfc

No. 88365

>>88362
You know what's not on the info or rules tab? The fact that if you don't sage in Celebricows, A THREAD ON OT, you can get banned for a day. It's not even stated as a rule in the thread itself so how does staff expect people to know. Sorry for derail kek

No. 88366

>>88363
She was an admin, not janny
>>88360
No make them lurk

No. 88367

>>88348
I’m not a coon for white people but this is unironically based, it’s very obvious being a white woman doesn’t always save you from rape or discrimination KEK

No. 88368

Can the mods wake up so much racebait in unpopular opinions

No. 88369

>>88368
>”mommy!! daddy!! please come there’s a monster under my bed!!”
Kek(bait)

No. 88370

>>88369
nta but racebait is against the rules

No. 88371

>>88369
NTA but you must be autistic if you can read these same stupid arguments about race every single time and not get tired of it.

No. 88374

>>88313
Not any of those anons but I disagree with your definition of blogging. Blogging, to me, is going off on a barely related tangent about your personal bullshit excessively. If someone has some input that lightly relates their relative experience to give context to their opinions, it shouldn't be considered blogging. Their point isn't "me me meeeeee!!", they're giving context to their inputs. I'm seeing quite a few people getting bullshit blogging bans recently across a variety of threads and I just think people have forgotten context.

No. 88375

>>88343
Not even true kek. Dana got banned for wking herself and now she's ban evading, same thing with Venus, she got banned after shitting up her thread. Also, it's clear they're not all Dana and some are her unironic followers

No. 88379

>>88369
Everytime one of you comes here to bitch about an anon placing a complaint, I immediately think you're the one who's causing the issues in the thread being reported. Stfu and learn how to use meta at minimum. We can bring reporting and concerns here too, especially when it's been going on for hours/days.

No. 88382

>>88374
blogging bans have been issued for peoole brigning up any personal experience at all, that's been the case since forever
and that's a good thing. people bringing discussion back to themselves is annoying as fuck.
people can talk about themsleves all they want on /ot/. no one wants to read about that in cow threads. this isn't plebbit

No. 88385

>>88374
You can post that same input without directing it to yourself, for example instead of using "In my experience" use "In some people's experience" etc. It's the same reason why you don't use the first person in a formal essay because it sounds subjective and focuses on you as equally as it focuses on the topic. It's also annoying to read because so many anons are egocentric and lack theory of mind.

No. 88387

Delete the incest thread from /m/. Three hours and already a honeypot for personalityfagging and baiting.

No. 88389

>>88382
>people can talk about themsleves all they want on /ot/.
nta but it's bannable in celebricows though

No. 88390

File: 1736117959957.png (236.47 KB, 636x1182, yducfjdtndfjnchvdg.png)

I know the emoji ban has always been a thing but for years I remember that uwu wasn't banned as long as it was "quoted like this" or inside a green text and only if it was used in a mocking manner. You can see it a lot in some earlier pixielocks threads. Even this one wasn't banned 23 days ago. Please don't ban "uwu" in all contexts it's a good way to mock cows.

No. 88391

I don’t like that the Elon Musk and Grimes thread was separated on the whim of a single anon. Changing the focus of, or the rules of a thread-especially a cow thread-should only be done if the overwhelming majority of anons agree. It’s happened before when an anon added a rule to the kinkshaming thread that you weren’t allowed to post screenshots from /g/, again with no discussion at all just decided by one anon out of the blue.

No. 88392

File: 1736129405899.jpg (75.1 KB, 771x482, 2025-01-06 030908.jpg)

There's no way this is allowed, am i tripping for finding this absolutely repulsive? I'm not a long time user of lolcow but there's no way this thread is going to be maintained, right?

No. 88393

>>88392
wtf Jannies get rid of this degenerate coombrained nonsense and banish all participants. What’s next? A shota or loli thread? Beastiality threads? The only people who want to goon over incest are scrotes and scrotes who need to dilate.

No. 88394

>>88393
Thread has been up for more than 9 hours, still nothing has been done about it

No. 88395

>>88392
>>88393
>>88394
I hate newfags. This is the height of pearl clutching. If you don't like the thread, hide it. It's misogynistic to imply that someone cannot be a woman if you disagree with the content that turns her on. There are women with all kinds of fucked up fetishes and sexual interests, that doesn't magically make them grow dick and a Y chromosome.

No. 88396

>>88392
why the fuck would someone make an incest thread? this has to be bait
>>88395
ntayrt but i don’t see how this is “pearl clutching” retard

No. 88397

>>88395
Agreed. The thread is tame and sfw. Where are these newfags coming from? And why do they care so much? Just hide the thread.

No. 88398

>>88397
Because it's common for lolcow to have outwardly unethical and deviant fetish threads?

No. 88399

>>88398
If seeing a glimpse of fanart of two anime siblings embracing scandalizes you so badly, you should not be using imageboards.

No. 88400

>>88399
It's about the philosophy of the imageboard, lolcow has shut down threads like "feminine energy" for less than that but an incest thread is fine? And yeah incest shocks me retard, maybe you should touch some fucking grass weirdo.

No. 88401

>>88400
>It's about the philosophy of the imageboard
Whatever philosophy you think lcf operates on, you’re clearly wrong. Moralfag all you want, but clearly farmhands don’t care because the thread is still up.

No. 88403

>>88401
Please, this whole imageboard is based on moralfagging with small side stepping for the AI husbando crazed farmers.

No. 88404

>>88393
I don’t mind the brocest fujos but I’m seeing straight up daughter/father shit

No. 88405

>>88392
Idk why anons act like you have to be a newfag to be against this kek. I'm not a pearl clutcher, I've been here since 2017 and even I think this should be locked.

No. 88406

>>88389
yeah because it's a cow thread. you don't blog in cow threads

No. 88408

>>>/w/342063
>I have 3 years worth of milk but all from private discords
Okay, then post it. I'm tired of these newfags thinking lolcow isn't an imageboard and that they can use this as some kind of confessions situation without actually talking about who it's about. Cow boards require cows to be posted.

No. 88410

Grimes thread is so full of unintegrated redditors with no milk except nitpicking her body and whiteknighting shivon, please do something about it mods.

No. 88411

>>88392
>>88393
>>88394
>>88396
i'm not into this shit but the reason why it was made is because incestfags kept flooding the cute couples thread with incest ships, so the thread is a containment basically. they weren't banned when they originally posted in the couples thread (that one who posted live action disney incest definitely should have been though jesus) so they probably won't be banned there either

No. 88412

>>88393
/m/ jannies dont guve a shit, they have been tolerating furfaggotry including one poster repeatedly trying to push pokemon x human porn. the incest coomers are tame in comparison

No. 88413

>>88395
Yeah guys it’s pearl clutching and not feminism to think gooning over family fucking is purely for scrotes. Did you type that with your empowered 6 fingers or 14 toes Alabama-chan?

No. 88415

>>88413
NTA but that thread is all like…anime brothers. I don't know what genshin impact shipping has to do with feminism, I'm not going to lie

No. 88418

>>88395
>I hate newfags. This is the height of pearl clutching. If you don't like the thread, hide it. It's misogynistic to imply that someone cannot be a woman if you disagree with the content that turns her on. There are women with all kinds of fucked up fetishes and sexual interests, that doesn't magically make them grow dick and a Y chromosome.
not liking incest ≠ newfag you fucktard kek. the weird ways women on lolcow try to turn any criticism into a feminism point is something only a corporate social media fag whose brain has rotted could come up with. what is with this spike like incest shit and why are you comfortable defending this. plz be troll and not some NEET faggot.

No. 88419

>>88411
I'm curious about what end of free speech does that thread stand since global rules does not allow anything that goes against American laws…and I'm pretty sure incest is illegal plus if that's allowed who's to say we won't get obvious degenerates like that zoophile in the monster thread? Its inviting trouble tbh

No. 88422

>>88419
you're retarded. media depicting incest is not against the law. game of thrones LITERALLY has siblings fucking on tv

No. 88423

>>88419
How old are you kek

No. 88424

>>88418
While I personally don't care about fandomfag fictional incest ships, it's pretty obvious that the newfags are the ones trying to change lc board culture by claiming anyone opposed to their weird degen shit is le misogynist, pearl clutching newfag, and I reject that on principle kek. Furries, incest, lolisho, where does it end? I'm tired of such a bullshit argument being used to excuse everything. Although to the thread's credit, they do urge farmers to keep the degeneracy low as incest tends to be scroteshit for the most part. So if it's tame, it's probably nothing to get worked up over.

No. 88425

>>88424
I also suspect they're newfags because the "but muh anime fandomfagging is feminist" argument is very Twitter and Tumblr.

No. 88426

>>88424
Obviously the end should be porn, as it already is. Nobody should post incest PORN or furry PORN but wholesome and sfw depictions should be and have been allowed like the sfw furry thread here >>>/m/389666

No. 88427

>>88425
Who is saying that? You retards are just making shit up

No. 88429

>>88423
Kek I know right, if they were over 18 they would know it’s totally normal to enjoy family members fucking and then goon about it online. It might be illegal irl but it’s only fictional families what’s the harm in that? I always wonder to myself, why is it when I talk about my sexy flat chested loli waifu people clutch their pearls, she is not a real child and is actually a vampire over 700 years old? Bigot newfags amaright?

>>88422
No one was gooning over that (I hope) it was supposed to be repulsive, unlike the entire of that disgusting thread posting shit like >>>/m/445764 whilst dilating which is only going to attract more degenerates. There should be no containment thread, they all should just be contained in a crate and dumped in the middle of the sea

No. 88430


No. 88431

>>88429
>dilating
NTA but do you people really think people gooning over genshin impact incest yaoi are troons? kek those are definitely real (degen) women

No. 88432

>>88431
I would never keep company like that to know. As far as I’m concerned you may as well be troons with your pornsick brainrot scrotefaggotry behaviour

No. 88433

>>88432
Damn it really took you 0 hours to prove >>88395 right. Women aren't women when they are degenerate

No. 88434

>>88433
Actually it took me 10 hours

No. 88435

>>88395
I’m not a newfag but I think the problem here is that we aren’t degenerates, we don’t like watching fictional faggots dicking each other as some kind of weird proxy of re-experiencing our childhood sexual trauma and we actually take showers washing and scrubbing directly under our arms and scrubbing the outside of our vaginas and then we go to work because we’re employable, have hobbies and semi-normal. Hope that helps

No. 88436

>>88395
This site was made to laugh at fags like you who dont get a hint when to shut up, its fucking hilarious you think incest was welcome here fictional or not. The admin needs to check their /m/ farmhands once more because that farmhand seems to let go the lolifaggotory in the vtuber thread the obvious zoofag in the pokemon thread. Somethings going on

No. 88437

>>88435
hey I shower at least three times a week and I always wash under my arms

No. 88439

The nonnas wanting to be coddled by farmers in the lolita thread are obnoxious. Please do something about these farmers who think cow boards don't require caps because they are afraid of being kicked out of coms. That's not out job to protect users like they. They need to put up or shut up. If they can't post they can use a different board but its shitting up the lolita thread with these "i could post but i wont teehee you just dont understand".

No. 88441

>>88413
Nta and not debating if it's right or not but that kind of stuff has been super popular in women dominated fandoms for ages, like Supernatural, Osomatsu-san, Ouran etc. From what i've seen scrotes are usually into the type that involves younger sisters and moms instead

No. 88442

>>88419
>>88429
the law doesn't care about that, otherwise A03, tumblr fics, subreddits with that content, and a hundred 4chin threads would've been shut down by now

No. 88443

>>88435
Tbh no one semi-normal is upset about a thread on an obscure imageboard where people are posting banal shit like Osomatsu brothers in 2024. No one semi-normal knows or cares about that.

No. 88444

>>88441
Super popular? Clearly not “super popular”, there was a reason it got put in a containment thread because no one wanted that shit and the reason why no other containment thread of incest has ever been made prior to this point, because no one wants that shit and the longer we keep protecting and creating echo chambers for retards the more “normal and super duper popular” retards are going to think it is. Not everything should be a preference that is accepted, same for moids who campaign about being a non offending minor attracted person. I swear lately farmers seem worse than the actual horrorcows that have been posted on this site, as another anon said, we used to laugh at people like that on here

No. 88445

>>88442
Ayrt hey faggot I said "global rules" as in the global rules of this fucking site you're on

No. 88446

>>88445
well you mentioned American laws in that same sentence

No. 88447

>Do not say, do or threaten to do anything illegal under United States law
I'm begging admin to bring back the VPN ban

No. 88448

>>88447
Nona Homestuck ship art isn't illegal under US law kek. Don't even havs to be an incestfag to know that

No. 88449

>>88447
Again, media depiction of incest is not against the law. Incest is but media depiction is not, just like how murder is illegal but showing murder in a tv show is not.

No. 88450

>>88447
You are 14 years old.

No. 88451

Lmao wondering why there was such hostility in the vent thread for guessing correctly a vpn troll (male) made the incest thread

No. 88452

>>88451
oh boy here comes the scrotefoiling despite the ships being clearly female ships no male is shipping hikaru and kaoru from ouran host club or KAEYA GENSHIN IMPACT

No. 88453

Please ban non-weebs from accessing /m/.

No. 88454

>>88452
Yea men have never liked lesbians

No. 88455

>>88454
I mean female ships as in the ships are clearly for women. Both pairings I just mentioned are Yaoi/BL ships

No. 88457

>>88453
Why? You suggesting Japans anime fried your brain and made you have a brother complex due to its constant normalisation of degeneracy so therefor REE normies get out? Gross. Even more reason to lock the thread, the repeated exposure to the normalisation of brotherfuckers sounds contagious.

No. 88458

>>88449
ayrt i wasnt talking about that brother/sister fucking shit anymore but pointing out posting anything against US law is in the global rules of the site

No. 88459

there are too many neets with barely any human interaction life being way too proud of their degenerate fetishes on this board.

No. 88460

What if the farmhands just autosaged the incest thread? I also think it's gross, but this way nobody would have to see it if they didn't want to and the animu posters who aren't just doing it for attention won't sperg out.

No. 88461

>>88460
You can also not have to see it by just hiding it. You're acting like people are posting porn in there or something when it's just random anime fanart.

No. 88462

>>88461
Nta but why not just make a general degenerate art thread? Why specify it like this

No. 88463

>>88462
The same reason we have a cuties with ouchies thread and salaryman thread. Threads are for specific topics.

No. 88465

>>88461
Autosage is the solution that would cause the least sperging, I think. It's not like you can't just search for it.

No. 88466

Wouldn't the incest thread be better suited to /g/ considering that it's a basically a coom thread? The husbando threads and threads relating to attraction to males are already present on /g/.

No. 88467

>>88466
Is the incest thread in /m/ about attraction to one's family members, or is it just image dumps and light conversation about different anime or video games (the same way other threads are in /m/)?

No. 88468

>>88467
I mean, that also applies to 80% of posts in the husbando thread kek

No. 88469

>>88467
No one is talking about their own family members, it's specifically about fictional incest couples as it was a spin off from the cute couples thread(containment). So far it's mostly image dumps and light discussion
>>88468
I honestly always thought the husbando threads should be on /m/ but I guess they were moved because it stopped being just image dumps and turned more into fic writing

No. 88470

>>88468
Don't the husbando anons ask about how to love their husbandos better and dedicate themselves to them or something? Seems more personal

No. 88471

>>88469
>I honestly always thought the husbando threads should be on /m/ but I guess they were moved because it stopped being just image dumps and turned more into fic writing
the /g/ version of husbando threads didn't start on /m/, they were made because there was too much horny posting in the Absolutely Retarded Shitposting thread, so someone suggested a horny shitpost thread on /g/. the /m/ husbando threads were different.

No. 88473

>>88459
KEK you've hit the nail on the head, nona.

No. 88474

File: 1736200958478.jpg (Spoiler Image,70.21 KB, 540x360, 7216269941682.JPG)

Doxxed the dunmeshi incest fag

No. 88475


No. 88476

>>88474
It makes perfect sense that this site is being colonized by gendie libfems who demand that no one kinkshame them because on their side of twitter degen shit is perfectly normal and acceptable.

No. 88477

>anons itt can’t understand a joke
>still seething about a thread they don’t like as if they were literal twitterfags embroiled in an anti vs pro shipper war
Anyways

No. 88478

>>88476
It's a tumblr meme

No. 88479

>>88476
This has to be bait. We do this "this was never a radfem website" spiel every month and it's true. This isn't an issue for the site. Its a personal issue.

No. 88480

>>88469
>the husbando threads should be on /m/
The reason they are not on /m/ is that they weren't solely husbando threads, they were hornyposting threads that got dominated by husbando posting and slowly got referred to as husbando threads. Someone changed the thread's name at some point, they were "Retarded hornyposting husbandoposting shitpost thread", husbando posting was only part of the content, but it got turned into "Retarded Husbando Hornyposting Shitposting Thread".

No. 88481

Unusual amount of exhausting 2x pinkpill sperging in /ot/, I'm assuming its the same anon repeating themselves like a broken record but it's been hours and it's just the same aggressive shit

No. 88485

File: 1736273986468.png (47.91 KB, 649x412, c6077858-6e95-48d3-8c2c-a13e1c…)

I know troonfoiling is annoying but we should be able to tell troons to gtfo too, nta

No. 88489

>>88485
Replying to scrotes makes them more likely to post here. They are craving female attention.

No. 88490

>>88485
Just ignore and report them. Men want attention. Dont give it to them

No. 88494

Shame on whatever mod deleted info about the Feline Guardians in the boycott thread.
Is there some rule against criticizing China now?

https://www.felineguardians.org/home

No. 88495

>>88494
this is not the place for your crusade

No. 88496

>>88495
What rules did that post break? I saw the anon posted in a thread about boycotting companies. Why not delete that thread then?

No. 88498

>>88495
yeah who cares? There's a whole off topic board for off topic discussion. how controlling are you?

No. 88500

>>88498
retards shilling their websites in multiple threads have always copped bans kek i dont make the rules

No. 88501

>>88500
I don't think it was that anon's personal site. it looks like an activist group. You didn't click the link and check it out, you wanted to make a snippy comment

No. 88503

Pedo baiting in the vent thread

No. 88504

Some fag’s posting oniiloli on /m/. Delete the incest thread already.

No. 88508

>>88501
anon you're trying too hard this is a gossip site I don't give a fuck about this shit

No. 88509

Why are we allowed to vent on scrotes of races and religions and the literal statistics of them in some threads but in others it's an immediate slap for "racebaiting" kek. What's next, are women not allowed to talk about their experiences with males of their own ethnicity now?

No. 88512

>>88509
Depends on whether another anon reported you or not.

No. 88515

why aren't furfags and furfaggotry defenders banned on sight jw

No. 88516

>>88515
Because one of the farmhands is one,I'm seeing more lolishit as well being kept up without banning even when I report it

No. 88517

/pol/faggotry is getting out of hand in the bong thread as of lately

No. 88518

>>88515
same, all I want is the literal degenerate shit like that cut off and trashed from this board

No. 88521

can farmhands ban the obvious baiter in the news thread in ot

No. 88525

>>88517
The weird overtly theatrical blackpill sperging lately on top of this has been a bit much.

No. 88526

>>88508
Nobody cares

No. 88527

News thread faggot still at it

No. 88528

>>88527
Which posts are the bait?

No. 88529

Why is there a porn addict retard camping out in the Attractive Women You’d Want to Fuck thread to complain about radfems and ovarit

No. 88530

File: 1736381008042.png (385.95 KB, 1000x782, 2014-09-19-1062sea.png)

Could something be done about the spoonfeeding requests and sealioning in every pixielocks thread? The most clear Jill things get wk that it's not that bad, its out of context or she's not to blame
>Sof is a farmer Jills retarded
>What if Sof didn't post about Jill
>Heres when she posted in these threads
>What if it was edited
>Heres when she RTd about child neglect as if she went through it
>What if she didn't mean it that way
>Jill was an awful daughter
>What if her moms a narc
>When she bought a bunch of sakura card captor shit but didn't care for it
>What if she did like it? It's not a big deal she like things!
>Heres her saying its boring
>But she does love her pretty cure!
Other cows never get this much "devils advocate" shit.

No. 88531

So all the /g/ jannys are just dead huh

No. 88533

Moid in the vent thread

No. 88535

Its hilarious the chief complaints here are that the board isnt banning enough people

No. 88536

Incompetent retards trying to raid in the "attractive women you want to fuck" thread on /g/ except they snitched on themselves immediately

No. 88537

Unfunny soyjak faggots raiding /g/

No. 88540

>>88537
Thank you for getting it cleaned up quickly!

No. 88541

If you just swiftly deleted the soyspammers posts in /ot/ he'd probably give up much faster l, just saying

No. 88543

>>88541
What posts? i havent seen soy spam on /ot/.

No. 88549

Maybe a mod or two needs to be reminded not to let their biases show. Your job is to be neutral, not petty and ridiculous.

No. 88550

>>88549
I haven't noticed any major difference. On what threads?

No. 88551

>>88549
where is your screenshot

No. 88552

File: 1736425965723.png (531.67 KB, 752x1495, 1000041887.png)

I reported the last two posts in celebricows since they need to take their shit to meta and stop filling up the thread by bashing the nonas posting content. instead the mod bans a nona (not me) participating in the discussion? Come the fuck on.

No. 88553

>>88552
the "unintegrated posting style" thing drives me bonkers. feels so nitpicky

No. 88554

>>88553
why? its part of the rules. post in a way that does not identify you on an anonymous board

No. 88555

>>88553
Maybe Learn2integrate.

No. 88557

>>88554
its not part of the rules, its part of the guidelines, and the guidelines don't spell out consequences, it simply asks users to avoid this behavior and makes it sound more like a suggestion rather than a rule you should avoid breaking lest ye be banned. there's some stuff i can understand like heavy emoji use and obnoxious typing styles and things like that, but i see people banned for things like adding linebreaks or not adding linebreaks and other little things like this that i don't even notice until the red text comes up. there's no way a line break makes someone distinguishable from other anons and doesn't feel like a "posting style". i've not seen this sort of all-or-nothing approach to a rule like this on other anonymous image boards. meanwhile other actual obvious rule-breaking comments sitting right next to them go untouched.
>>88555
was there something about my comment that indicates i am not integrated? i would hate to get banned for something like using incorrect punctuation or anything else the mods randomly decide is "unintegrated posting style"

No. 88558

>>88557
The mods are spergs and don't understand nuance, it's been happening with everything. Doesn't help that nu-admin still gets advice from shaymin on the regular.

No. 88559

>>88557
Bans are report based. So if you see something breaking the rules you report it. That anon got banned because other users noticed.

No. 88560

>>88557
First indicator was the spacing.

No. 88561

>>88553
Some posts are annoying and out of place, though. Seeing something like "no cap fr fr omg it's giving" just feels weird here compared to other social media sites. Literally all you have to do to integrate is type full sentences kek

No. 88562

>>88557
Don't get worked up nonna, farmhands just ban everything that gets reported. High chances are someone got butthurt by your post and scrambled for an excuse to report. Happens to the best of us.

No. 88563

>>88557
calm down faggot its not the end of the world

No. 88564

>>88559
you're telling me the mods don't act on rulebreakers unless its reported? come on now
>>88560
can you be more specific?
>>88562
the post with red text in >>88552 is not my post. i just think its dumb to see things as minor as this catch a ban while other flagrant rule breakers run rampant.

No. 88569

File: 1736451932320.png (147.06 KB, 608x568, 1000031100.png)

Baiting male in the vent thread.

No. 88570

>>88564
>can you be more specific?
lol how new are you? if you can't tell what's non-integrated about that post you're either a sped or a newfag. jfc why do retards take bans so personally. that anon in the picture you uploaded probably got banned for 3 or 6 hours. it's not the end of the world.

No. 88572

>>>/g/466899
Shouldn't this ita thread be on /w/? Looks like a bad fit for /g/

No. 88573

>>88572
>shit thread and OP is spamming thread

…is this janitor new? normally whoever starts the ita thread is expected to populate it somewhat. i'm not even OP but the past couple interactions with whoever's monitoring the lolita threads makes it feel like users are dealing with someone on a weird power trip.

No. 88574

>>88570
i can understand why that post was flagged that way, but i was asking what about my post was unintegrated? because i really have no idea what was wrong with my spacing in my original comment here >>88553

No. 88575

We should ban replying in the opinion thread

No. 88576

>>88572
/g/ is better because itll all be nitpicking and not cow specific half the time. /w/ is a cow board.

No. 88577

>>88575
I agree that the opinion thread is retarded but you can just use the "get it off your chest" thread if you don't want any replies.

No. 88578

>>88564
No, I'm telling you other people also report posts, so it's not only farmahnds thinking that's unintegrated.
>>88574
That anon isn't talking about your post, it's about the obvious spacing in the op pics.

No. 88579

Can we lock the Isabella thread? There isn't any milk on her and newfags and scrotes come to bump it and troll

No. 88580

>>88552
Posts like that have typically been banned on cow boards, celebricows is a lite cow thread so would follow the same rules as other cow threads. Also everything that anon said could have been kept in her head and doesn't make up for reply spamming.

No. 88584

Can we get a fat people thread? Not just for bodypositivity or infinifat like that one old thread but instead a general thread for any fat person with cowish behaviour. Emphasis on people/person because usually we always talk about fat women and moids shouldn't be coddled

No. 88585

>>88584
Why do you ask for permission? If you want to make a thread, just make a thread. Follow the guides on how to make a new thread, make sure the OP is interesting, share a few cows that you find milky, and then post. If it's a good idea, it'll be a popular thread, if it's not then it'll die.

No. 88586

I second nonas in the thread suggesting mundane shit should go back to being about personal events and not random thoughts relating to anything.
Too many posts are being made that are better suited for other threa topics such as >>>/ot/2340853 discussing about a tranny. If I wanted to complain about troons I would go to the gc thread not fucking mundane shit

No. 88587

Why isn't the witchcraft thread in /g/ when tarot and manifestation are? I don't really mind but it's confusing how it works to me.

No. 88588

Since when was letter U letter W letter U considered an emoji? I don't remember it being redtexted years ago. Hell I only recall seeing it redtexted as of a few weeks(?) ago. If it's an emoji now I feel like it should be exceptioned in like the heart character because it's just a sound like kawaii uguu but not anime. If you google it in quotation marks + lolcow you can find dozens of results. All from months/years ago.

No. 88589

>>88588
This is bait. Everyone knows they are the same types of emojis as table flipping and the kirby dance.

No. 88590

>>88580
I can't understand having an issue with a nona responding to the posts. She put all her thoughts in one post, which isn't reply spamming at all. I liked her connection to the parable of the sower. Why do you think she should have not posted at all?

No. 88591

>>88590
Anon can't even reply properly. Stop coddling retards.

No. 88602

what if i make a new celebricows thread but skip the summary

No. 88609

>>88588
I think whatever farmhand currently hands out the bans is a genuine newfag. Seen so many stupid redtexts in the past week. This and the lack of lolcow award results and vpn vote makes me nervous to be honest.

>>88589
It's used ironically and has been tolerated since forever.

No. 88610

Test

No. 88615

>>88609
>It's used ironically and has been tolerated since forever.
Times are changing. Get with the program, oldfag.

No. 88617

>>88602
Honestly I'd be fine with it. I never read the summaries anyway kek
>>88589
Ntayrt but no I actually didn't know it was an emoji until this banning thing happened. I thought it was just a cringe noise made to sound cutesy. I don't really care if it's banned or not, but I think there should be an announcement that it's now being considered an emoji just for clarity. Though I guess it being redtexted now is sort of an announcement.

No. 88619

>>88617
UwU started as an emoticon but it went through the meme machine a decade ago and is just used as a word for the most part these days.

No. 88620

>>88615
You seem like the kind of person who just agrees with whatever the rules are because “those are the rules”. Like they could announce the exact opposite tomorrow and you’d be in here telling everyone to behave. It’s very weird.

No. 88621

File: 1736564148175.png (137.01 KB, 1472x989, jilluwu.png)

>>88588
Looks like the bans started two weeks ago? From the Jill thread. Seriously, why the change?

>>88589
Don't be retarded.

No. 88622

>>88621
Newfags were overusing it.

No. 88623

File: 1736568062359.png (18.84 KB, 1818x153, ,y.png)

Mentioning that a specific group of animal abusers that made me want to vent happen to be Chinese isn't racebait, lmao. Like it or not, China actually is the only country right now with a massive underground animal torture industry that their government refuses to clamp down on despite multiple reports from Chinese locals as well as ongoing protests at multiple embassies. This is easily Googled. Even fucking Indonesia jails people for animal abuse, there's no excuse for China not to.
If it was Belgium or Germany or Korea doing this, I'd say the same thing. Whichever farmhand banned me for this should instead be complaining to the CCP for turning China into an international embarrassment.

No. 88624

>>88623
Lmao we have gone full tumblr now #tw race mention

No. 88626

>>88623
Farmhand, it's actually very common to have these guys film and post about their torture in China. It's not race bait, there's proof about how to torture cats in different ways. They were snatching up cats from local feeders ffs and the feeders have cameras. This isn't some tinfoil.

No. 88627

>>88623
>>88624
Racebait isn’t banned because it’s ~triggering~, it’s banned because it creates receptive race wars and race obsessed discussion that we’ve seen enough of. Just take the temp ban and move on. God newfags are annoying.

No. 88628

>>88627
Everything can be infought about, retard. Nothing about that post had to do with race.
>n-newfag
I've been on this site from the start, it was never board culture to ban people for mentioning a nationality. Go back to Tumblr or Twitter if you're so delicate and fragile you'll start a race war over a vent post in a vent thread.

No. 88629

>>88628
I mean, you’re the sensitive faggot whining about a ban here that was probably only a few hours top, kek

No. 88630

>>88628
I think the farmhand really should undo the ban. Even if it was an hour like >>88629 says. This news was all over tiktok and has truth to it. There's videos of the cats being fed acid, dismembered… On these feeder cams. It's okay to mention Chinese when it's taking place in China. The ones who have been caught have all been Chinese citizens.

No. 88631

>>88630
>This news was all over tiktok
The absolute state of lolcow.

No. 88632

>>88631
Sucks to say that tiktok is a massive social media platform. You can find the same videos via reels and youtube stories. I'm an oldfag and I'm not going to pretend to clutch my pearls over someone mentioning videos they saw on which platform. There's also news articles. Pick one, anon. Which term wouldn't trigger you?

No. 88633

>>88627
Mentioning a race isn’t racebait and banning any mention of race is retarded. Especially since according to this rule anons wouldn’t be able to mention their own race or ethnicity either.

No. 88634

>>88626
>>88630
Exactly, there have been multiple news articles about it. They operate on Telegram and certain Chinese apps, and have even been trying to recruit "customers" in the US.
Pretending that discussion and disgust about something most people are caught up on now is "racebait" is basically just shitting on non-sadistic Chinese people and acting like this is somehow innate to their race (it isn't). Being Chinese doesn't make you an animal abuser. In fact, every sane Chinese person is disgusted with animal torturers, just like every other civilized human being on the planet. Only subhuman incel cockroaches and dysgenic pickmeishas disagree. The same men doing this also talk about wanting to kill/rape women and children, by the way. They groom little kids and target mentally ill, self-harming teens and pay them to participate in this shit. The government's not doing anything because they also have failson roaches in their homes who get off to animal torture.

No. 88635

>>88632
You must be autistic if you can’t see the irony in telling an anon to go back to twitter/tumblr and then citing tiktok as a news source. It’s not triggering, it’s just kinda funny but mostly sad.

No. 88640

>>88635
I am not >>88628 There's more than one farmer posting, retard.

>>88634
The selling of the videos sickens me too.. I hate this so much and have found nowhere to talk about it.

No. 88641

>>88629
>>88631
>>88635
I've never understood you whiny spergs who camp out in this thread and mald at people for complaining about poor mod decisions in the complaints and suggestions thread.
>You must be autistic if you can’t see the irony in telling an anon to go back to twitter/tumblr and then citing tiktok as a news source.
I said to go back to Twitter or Tumblr, not that anon. There are multiple posters here. Anyone who sees a nationality mentioned and thinks "Oh nooo, a race war is coming" does need to go back. What's next, banning any mention of gender because it might start a gender war? Piss off.

No. 88644

>>88627
That's true. I know racebait can be hard tp discern sometimes but OPs post clearly wasn't meant in a racebaity way. It's like saying "british cuisine tastes awful to me", it's not about a race of people. In OPs posts it's about chinese animal torture rings which are a thing, not chinese people in general.

No. 88646

>>88623
I think it's just the way you worded it? "Chinese fucks" out of nowhere sounds like you're trying to racebait since it's how actual moid racebaiters describe races (Chinese or otherwise). Especially with no clarification that the majority of animal torturers online are Chinese. For example nothing in your post here or these anons >>88626
>>88630 sounds racebaity

Clarifying would also prevent actual racebaiters from swooping in. It's hard in the heat of the moment when you're venting, but that way you avoid any actual bait from tourists

No. 88647

>>88623
out of context it was definitely racebaity. are you the sperg that kept spamming that feline defenders website?

No. 88650

redtext trigger happy farmhand is going to single-handedly kill /snow/ and /w/

No. 88651

>>88649
That's amazing and relieving to hear. Thanks cerbmin mwah mwah

No. 88653

>>88647
Anons have been talking about the animal torture stuff for close to a year or two now already, it's weird to try and attribute this topic to one "sperg". I also haven't personally seen any anon spam about Feline Guardians(?), but even if there is one, I'd still prefer the occasional post about that over some of the shit that's going unbanned (like that one blowjob poster, who's started straight-up posting porn here now).

No. 88654

>>88653
I wonder if it's the same anon who occasionally posts weirdass BDSM porn in /g/

No. 88655

>>88646
I kind of see what you mean, but the line seems more and more arbitrary these days. Like the anons insulting Islam getting mixed in with racists.

No. 88656

CP in the pinned /ot/ movie room thread

No. 88658

grimes thread is being derailed by beauty standards and trannies that its barely about grimes anymore.

No. 88659

>>88653
the posts were deleted but there was one anon posting links to the feline defenders website across multiple threads and sperging about how no one is suppsedly allowed to criticize China, muh CCP shills and whatnot

No. 88660

File: 1736604059269.jpeg (114.68 KB, 620x402, IMG_0156.jpeg)

>>88623
no one shares your passion. you saw something on tik tok and got so morally outraged youre trying to use this site as a way to "spread awareness"
no one gives a fuck. I'm so sick of the corporate social media mentality of "spreading awareness" to the point if you hear any counterpoint you think that person is apart of the problem. the state of lc to have these gen z retards hopped up on dopamine and moral panic always coming here.

No. 88665

Please could someone make a new celebricows thread? I’d do it but I’m on my phone

No. 88667

>>88660
This is a very personal rant. This is /meta/, maybe you should go to the vent thread to complain about how only gen z doesn't like animal abuse and things discussed in the news are actually all just TikTok?
Nonny, this thread isn't for unrelated blogposts or generation sperging, there's no good reason to clog it up trying to argue with screenshotted/redtexted posts that trigger you and accuse people of shit. You don't sound more like some sort of righteously indignant oldfag, you're more like an insect trying to fly through a closed window.

No. 88669

>>88650
I love that you post this with no moderating examples. Probably because anons would say its deserved.

No. 88670

Reported already but just in case: there's an agressive troon baiter in the Gender Ideology thread

No. 88671

Can a mod please do something about this >>342420 poster in the Micky thread? They keep whiteknighting and basically asking to be spoonfed.

No. 88672

>>88671
docfag do you not know how to link posts?

No. 88673

>>88672
I'm not the fucking docfag. You're not supposed to asked to be spoonfed. Either look through the old threads or fuck off.

No. 88675

>>88673
No one asked you be spoonfed. You assuming that is a problem and is false flagging anons. Same way everyone is a whiteknight to you. Get over. You're clearly a newfag. Hi cowing and can't link board posts.

No. 88676

>>88675
I've been on these boards for years, just because I fuck up linking a post once and say it's possible that a cow might be posting (especially since they have a history of posting in their thread) doesn't make me a newfag.

No. 88679

>>88676
>I've been here for years and I still don't know how to link a post!
Being a newfag isn't really about how long you've been on the website. Being a newfag is a state of mind. Even if you've been on here for years, you still can't link a post and that makes you a newfag.

No. 88681

>>88676
100% newfag. Your unmilky posts prove that enough. Its so boring to have "new posts" be old milk micky is bringing up again when it involes anons just bringing up old milk again. That's not helping the thread go anywhere. Post when she talks about new things, not her old milk. There's nothing for farmers to talk about because of it.

No. 88683

CP on /m/

No. 88684

CP spammed in m tattoo thread

No. 88685

What happened to those warnings about posting milkless updates in the taylor thread? Wouldn't it have been locked by now since the warnings were 3 months ago and it hasn't gotten better? Anons gasping at soap is some dumbass shitposting.

No. 88689

>>88685
still desperate to have her thread locked? imo the poster who has to defend Taylor from anything posted in her thread shits up the place far more than some mildly boring posts.

It is bizarre that she seems to be shilling Disneyland Tokyo of all places. Guess we'll have to wait to find out if the whole trip was comped.

No. 88690

>>88689
Thank god posting about her shilling is also banned. >>>/w/337812 You are obsessed.

No. 88691

could we have a redtext on "poon" and "pooner"? it's gross kiwifag language

No. 88692

>>88690
just hide threads you dislike, it's easy

No. 88693

>>88692
Problem is anons do like Taylor as a cow. They shouldn't have to hide it because some posters are posting about soap.

No. 88694

>>88691
ok pooner

No. 88698

do you intend to do anything about the retard defending trannies in the hellmas tread or

No. 88699

The taylorfag from w is having a meltdown in opinions >>>/ot/234353 Replying just to complain about anons not finding Taylor's disneyland soap adventure milky

No. 88700

>>88681
>>88679
I've been here since the first thread. And again, just because I fuck up one time linking a post means nothing. Also, just because you won't take the time to actually read the screenshot doesn't make it not milk.

No. 88702

>>88691
I agree. We have plenty of things to call TiFs that aren't misogynistic references to their vaginas.

No. 88703

>>88694
she's right

No. 88705

>>88691
Agreed, its unintegrated, misogynistic and moidy as hell

No. 88707

File: 1736714320722.png (379.91 KB, 1080x1369, 43448~2.png)

Whatever this is from the things you remembered thread.unfunny and try hard,where did this subhuman even come from?take your meds being defensive over some stupid cartoon.this isn't even funny just pathetic.(unintegrated posting style)

No. 88708

>>88707
Just somebody trying too hard to get posted in the funny caps thread kek

No. 88709

>>88707
I mean you got hurt enough to post about it in /meta/ so maybe don't insult Dora next time.

No. 88710

>>88707
It should be ignored and reported for bait tbh. No one on lolcow is seriously this autistic over a dated, mid children's show.

No. 88711

>>88707
Is your space button broken?

No. 88712

>>88709
Nah I will more to make you cope and seethe harder.Dora is retarded and so is that anon.Its bait but it's just pathetically unfunny.

No. 88713

>>88712
What's wrong with your space button?

No. 88714

>>88713
I'm on mobile and sometimes I type way too fast.nothing to worry about I've seen other anons type way worse than me and you don't see anyone else calling them out.

No. 88715

>>88714
Oh okay but why don't you just turn on the autocorrect feature where it automatically includes a space after a period?

No. 88716

>>88715
Because I am just too retarded unfortunately.didn't think of that before but will turn that on for now on so thank you dear nonnie.

No. 88717

>>88713
This isnt a big deal

No. 88718

>>88714
yeah but your posts stand out. it's easy to tell which ones are yours.

No. 88719

>>88716
I'm a subhuman when I defend Dora but I'm a dear nonnie when I take pity and help a retard out. Such is life.
>>88717
I was genuinely asking because I was confused and curious.

No. 88720

>>88717
Eh, in a thread it stands out and you can see which posts are made by the same person.

No. 88721

Not that poster, but can we ban false flag accusations like whiteknighting? It's a cope for anons who can't handle correcting or giving more appropriate explanations about cow posts. Just because it's giving more details about what's happening or going on with the cow doesn't make someone a whitknight. >>>/w/342493

No. 88722

>>88721
The post literally starts off with "not to wk." We don't need randos to give "more appropriate explanations" on cows.

No. 88723

>>88722
Having to say that so that people don't assume your explanation means you're whiteknighting has become normal on a few threads and it's ridiculous because some posters are just saying whatever shit about a cow without even using common sense or researching anything. It's like having to teach children.

No. 88724

PLEASE REINSTATE THE VPN BAN.
the threads get shitty every time the bans are lifted

No. 88725

>>88723
It really isn't your job to "teach" anons anything. If they're saying stupid shit, just report them.

No. 88726

>>88725
Jesus christ, anon. I know this is a gossip site, but at least try to have some sort of functional discussion.

No. 88727

Would it be possible to add metadata stripping for images? I have been able to download some images that have an author in the metadata which probably isn't good for an anonymous image board

Also PSA if you use the windows snipping tool to save an image it will save your name to the metadata depending on the file format

No. 88728

NOTICE

Thread has reached 1100 posts. The thread will be locked and you will be unable to post in it shortly after it exceeds 1200 posts. Please begin preparing a new thread and post a link to it when it's created.

No. 88729

>>88712
Your seethe is hilarious

No. 88732

i think we are being raided everyone, buckle up.

No. 88733

>>88732
What why?

No. 88734

>>88733
some weird posts in /w/ happening

No. 88736

Ban and delete the Facebook middle aged moid who somehow discovered this site on /ot/

No. 88737

>>88736
it seems to be random people from kiwifarms.

No. 88738

>>88737
Nah I doubt KF, even they would know not to do that on KF itself and that nobody would give a shit. Only Facebook xoomers do this

No. 88739

The unfun farmhand found the fun threads again. I agree with cowtipping being retarded but he's having a bpd meltdown right now and it shouldn't be a bannable offense to post it.

No. 88740

>>88739
I have nothing to do with the bans or that thread, but is it really that entertaining to poke a cow into a non-organic meltdown? Not only that, but to brag about it on here of all places not expecting to get banned?

No. 88743

>>88740
NTA that's valid but ayrt said the cowtipping is retarded, I think they mean the other red texts and general heavy handedness espec considering there's so much milk

No. 88745

It's fucking obnoxious that anons aren't willing to do the bare minimum to post milk. Why are you taking screenshots of a cow's stories instead of posting the video? Is technology really that hard for some of you?

No. 88746

>>88745
This is why I don't bother coming on here for cows anymore. The milk just ain't that good anymore.

No. 88747

>>88745
yes youd be surprised some anons arent fully aware of what a phone is capable of. some cant even screenshot right. google is free

No. 88748

Farmhand on /snow/ please get a fucking grip.

No. 88749

File: 1736787723868.jpg (543.46 KB, 1080x2178, Screenshot_20250113_135923_Sam…)

Not what cowtipping means, they just let any newfag be a janny nowadays, huh

No. 88750

>>88745
Then post the milk yourself, lazy retard. Some of you expect to be spoonfed absolutely everything while refusing to download "normie" social media like TikTok or ig to keep up with cows and even have the audacity to complain

No. 88751

File: 1736792012577.jpeg (558.84 KB, 1170x884, IMG_6820.jpeg)

Troon in the mtf thread who was talking about how terfs and lesbians are pedos, but he kept deleting the posts a few minutes after posting them

No. 88752

>>88750
I do, but keep raging.

No. 88753

>>88749
What does anon mean by pushing his buttons then? Anons shouldn't be interacting with the cow at all. Not just letting them know lolcow exists.

No. 88754

Completely over the newfags the jirai thread has brought to /w/. >>>/w/342592 NTA but turning the discussion into this is ridiculous. "You sound like vanilla" as if they haven't been told to not act like this in the thread before.

No. 88755

>>88749
that’s exactly what fucking cowtipping means jackass.

No. 88759

>>88757
Lolcowland sounds like the world's shittiest theme park kek

No. 88760

>>88754
I think they've legitimately forgotten that the thread doesn't work like a Discord server kek

No. 88761

>>88756
>why do people on here are
>>88757
>no other been get
Well at least nonas are self aware kek

No. 88762

>>88760
Tired of threads where the farmers are the biggest of the cows. These newfags make kneejerk threads with barely any substance because they think nitpicking looks alone is enough to keep a thread alive

No. 88763

>>88762
This
>But but but she shoops her pictures and is a mean girl, I don’t have any evidence of her being mean but believe she’s a cow!
Jirai-kei thread I lowkey think a lot of stuff is also posted by 2 cows (or the friend group of) who hate each other as they were both posted on here during some twitter fight a while back and there has been non stop vendetta tier posting of both of them ever since. Every time one of them get mentioned the conversation is swiftly diverted to some nothingburger the other one did. So boring

No. 88764

>>88762
and tbey think making a thread is an accomplishment or something
>yes we have a thread! I'm no longer a newfag!
well you didn't win anything. its not like making an entry in a diary or similar to discord. and if the thread is shit why dod you bother making one?

No. 88765

>>88724
Seconding this. People only use VPNs to ban evade and post bait.

No. 88766

>>88765
why don't you just go to reddit

No. 88767

why the fuck we're not allowed to express our non terfy opinions on this website? why they can't go to fucking ovarit? im sick of being banned or getting red texted for not being a retard

No. 88768

>>88767
what post(s) are you referring to?

No. 88769

>>88767
Go back.

No. 88770

>>88767
>is a retard

No. 88771

>>88766
Why do you need a VPN unless you're using it to ban evade?

No. 88772

Please do something about the anon starting repeated infights in the sinnabunny thread. They've been at it all day

No. 88773

This jirai retard wont post caps and admits they wont post caps >>>/w/342638 its obvious this poster is vendettafagging if they won't do bare minimum work.

No. 88774

>>88767
You can go ahead and suck tranny dick pretty much any mainstream social media platform. Fuck off

No. 88775

Shayfags keep shitting up Dana's thread and derailing to make it about her

No. 88776

>>88775
Kek ofc they are

No. 88784

Since the clock app might be going away soon, could we have a feature to embed insta clips? I wouldn't be surprised if there is going to be a mass migration of TikTok users to insta in the future

No. 88787

some tranny is shitting up 2X and gc threads in OT

No. 88871

Raid thread on /meta/

No. 88920

>>88871
A pathetic one at that

No. 88923

File: 1736908724344.png (41.84 KB, 519x343, 88888.PNG)

nice

No. 88926

since making your posts recognisable is a bannable offence, could you deal with the retard in /m/ who still can't use a spacebar? her posts stand out from a mile away and she's been told as much and still refuses to integrate

No. 88929

Please lock the skirby thread already. They've broken every rule in the farmhand notice and they can't even sage

No. 88930

>>88929
This. Still posting dumbass edits. Still posting unsaged. They know for a fact there is no vagina in the newest photo, but want to play dumb and bump the thread because they think it's funny. No woman is looking at that and thinking you can see someone's pussy. It's either some retard male or the posters are doing this on purpose. It's not funny. It's bad farmers. The site needs to stop giving all these chances in these threads for farmers who are always, and purposely, going to break the rules a farmhand has to post in thread about.

No. 88931

>>88929
ATP i feel like it's just to keep the tiktokfags contained

No. 88932

File: 1736926729541.jpg (14.61 KB, 770x85, poiujhg.jpg)

>>88920
I'm not sure to understand what was unintegrated about that post

No. 88933

>>88932
If you don't understand, you need to integrate.

No. 88934

>>88930
They've had so many chances to stop, it has to be deliberate at this point. These are not difficult rules to follow

No. 88936

I get that mods don't want to use extreme measures but there's no point in giving skirbyfags another opportunity to shit up snow. They aren't going to listen, they do not care. They're going to chimp out like last time then go right back to being retarded. Why even bother

No. 88937

>>88932
can a farmhand redtext this with integrate

No. 88939

lone moid spamming porn in ot

No. 88940

File: 1736936482459.jpg (Spoiler Image,53.91 KB, 695x479, soxsosos.jpg)

>>86783
Ban please? Baiting fat moid in the vent thread.(why would you repost this unspoilered instead of just linking to the post)

No. 88941

>>88937
Is it a requirement to use TIM and TIF (and or troon/tranny) ?

No. 88942

>>88941
You can use any words you want except for retarded ones I hope this helps

No. 88943

>>88940
You fagtard dont post the same shit the moid posted just link the shit.

No. 88944

>>88941
Dios mio, just integrate. On that note why do newfags think they gotta post as soon as they find the site? I browsed the site for years until I made a post

No. 88945

>>88941
lurk moar until you figure it out for yourself

No. 88946

>>88941
FTM and MTF is also fine, or just call them for what they are (male if male, female if female). just acknowledge their biology if that makes sense

No. 88947

>>88929
on that note, there needs to be harsher bans for people who repeatedly break the rules tbh, especially for not integrating because that increases chances for breaking other rules

No. 88948

>>88932
just saw this and I guess you should have put "woman" between quotations or else it will look unintegrated. it's mainly because nobody thinks they're really "women".
>look at this trans "woman" at the start of their "transition" lmao
or something.

No. 88949

>>88944
I don't know why but it seems the loudest newest fags are just flat refusing to lurk.

No. 88954

>>88951
raa! heres a rape threat! jk, women don't do that

No. 88961

>>88936
now they're even arguing with a farmhand unsaged kek why not just lock the thread already, it's obvious they hate using an imageboard and are purposely refusing to integrate/follow rules

No. 88962

>>88961
Responding to a final warning from farmhands with "you post milk if it's so serious" is hands down the stupidest fucking thing I've ever seen on this imageboard. I am in awe of how retarded these anons are

No. 88965

File: 1736965474210.png (23.72 KB, 1637x369, lock it.png)

Lock it. This is ridiculous. I think she should be a banned subject to post about just because they are acting like this too. They will instead go to other threads to spam about her like they did in photoshop. Skirby isn't a good cow and the people who follow her to post about her here are all clearly retards.

No. 88967

>>88965
Even mid shit flinging at farmhands they're going on about obese obese obese. They've already ignored the final warning. Lock it.

No. 88971

>>88965
can they do this to empath's thread too.

No. 88972

>>88967
Still unlocked. Why is it so hard?

No. 88976

the VPN ban cannot come soon enough. i keep seeing shitty bait all over the place and /pol/ images being used in casual conversation to trick nonas into replying. these morons need to go back

No. 88977

>>88976
Are you taking about the eye color image?

No. 88978

>>88977
not just that, I've been seeing it all over.
the Disney thread got weird posts in it which luckily got swept up, but it's been a lot scattered around.

No. 88979

>>88978
Well I posted the eye chart and didn't think it was a big deal. I know there's a /Pol/ meme version but there's a reason I didn't use that one

No. 88980

File: 1736993643924.png (251.4 KB, 587x444, 1000003552.png)

>>88979
sorry for assuming, nona. i think i'm on tinfoil high alert because of the other posts i saw.

No. 88984

Japan thread derailing about akidearest. If anons want to complain about not liking her they can go to w. The og post about her was already banned

No. 88985

>>88984
stop replying then you fucking retard

No. 88986

>>88985
Calm down and go touch grass, nonna.

No. 88987

>>88986
You are literally causing a derail and then coming to complain I think you probably should calm down.

No. 88988

With the looming VPN ban would it be possible to implement a white list of VPN ranges that are known to be used by legitimate site users?

For example farmers with a good reason to use a VPN, such as government censorship, could email Cerbmin what VPN range they use and this could be added to a white list. This would allow long term VPN users that are known by the moderation to not be ban evading or intentionally causing problems to use the site with a VPN while blocking VPN ranges that are used for abuse.

No. 88989

>>88988
If users do vote for a VPN ban we intend to implement something like this, but using cookies rather than VPN ranges. We'll give the user a link to click on their devices that sets a particular cookie that allows them to post from VPN. We are aware that users in certain countries absolutely must use a VPN to post (e.g. Russia, China) and we don't intend to exclude them from using the site due to factors outside their control.

No. 88990

>>>/w/342783
it wasn't derailing because addy is shilling them and the posts above mention addy and why she's wrong. we should be able to criticize addy and her binder shilling. now give me my deserved ban.

No. 88991

>>88989
wouldn't that mean that the cookies will make everyone's identities easier to find and reveal? I'm sorry it's a genuine question because I don't know how it would work. wouldn't it make the use of VPNs redundant? privacy issues and stuff

No. 88992

>>88991
anon I'm begging you to use google lol. this site already uses cookies to store stuff like your site theme? if you use a VPN your traffic is encrypted, the only thing posting with a specific cookie would mean is that your posts on this site all have the same cookie. that can't be traced to you IRL at all. if admin allows a specific VPN for a specific user then every post by that IP can be tied to one user too, it doesn't change anything especially since any time you post or browse (anywhere not just on this site) you also give your useragent which shows what device you're on

No. 88993

>>88989
I hope there's some nuanced options in the poll (like bans on specific boards or threads) and not just all-or-nothing

No. 88994

>>88993
Agreed. It would also be nice to have some kind of run-off options… Like you get to choose your favorite two options instead of just one.

No. 88996

>>88990
They should ban you for double posting the same thing in both threads. Newfags, fuck off.

No. 88999

>>88996
Farmhands wouldn't ban a complaint on this thread even if it was a double post. Newfag.

No. 89000

>>88999
Who said the ban should be in /meta/? They can ban the post in the Addy thread.

No. 89001

>>89000
And they will? Lmao, that's why it was posted in both threads, it was going to be banned with "take it to /meta/" anyway. Just let farmhands do their job and stop seething on their behalf.

No. 89002

If possible, I request farmhands to keep a closer eye on the trad wellness thread >>>/snow/2048090 because since it's inception it consistently gets derailed with infighting, racebaiting, nitpicking, and newfags who respond to bait

No. 89003

>>89001
Do you know where you are?

No. 89004

>>89001
Idk why you nonnas defend shitposters. It's wild.

No. 89013

moid in the advice thread on /g/ posting fetish porn of a woman giving birth

No. 89014

I've noticed an uptake of "racial" fetish posts, taking about black people, anyone else noticed this?

No. 89017

The retard in the #2 Right Wing / Alt Right / Trad thread calling women "mulatto", nitpicking and saying retarded shit in general. Any anon who notices/points it out, is accused of being a right wing sympathizer, banned and will now receive a perma-ban for infighting (or responding, since the baiting anon escalates everything). The thread basically exists for one retard to sperg baity nonsense and then they report anyone who reply, since this anon refuses to read those replies and writes insane/reactionary responses to anything anyone posts

No. 89018

File: 1737120802507.jpg (56.63 KB, 1226x320, Serious_Business.jpg)

>>89017
samefag but if this is a containment thread for this one anon, other farmers should at least be aware

No. 89026

Hi farmhands. Can we please do something about the bp sperging in the autism thread? I'm sure the nonna sperging is very autistic, but she (or someone like her) has been doing this across multiple /ot/ threads and it's getting annoying. They already have an entire thread on the hidden board.

No. 89027

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 89029

I know it's the unpopular opinions thread and everyone is generally very dumb in there, but it is getting derailed by all the nonas arguing about blondes vs brunettes. Especially with the comparison of Marilyn Monroe and Audrey Hepburn. Why does it matter? Those women are both dead.

No. 89030

>>89029
One of those anons is probably carrey-chan yet again

No. 89033

>>89017
Yes, you should be banned for responding to obvious bait. It shits up the site just as much.

No. 89034

File: 1737136013076.png (6.48 KB, 554x112, stupidjannybitch.png)

This mod in particular and the stupid cunts who have been strangling /snow/ have been shitting up the site for far too long. Powertripping jannies are peak retardation. Kill Yourselves.

No. 89035

>>89034
Replying in the get it off your chest thread is against the rules

No. 89036

>>89035
The GIOYC thread is an amazing retard filter.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]