[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

File: 1732658958569.gif (21.41 KB, 540x486, tumblr_4b2f949a04276cf724eec7b…)

No. 86783

No. 86784

>>86780
>goon
Can you follow her back there?

No. 86785

>>86748
I'm so tired of the underages from twitter and tiktok, they make their posts so obvious i feel like crazy seeing no one call them out on their retardation and zoomer lingo

No. 86786

>>86748
>>86785
FUCKING THIS. They’re instantly recognizable by their brain dead takes, logical fallacies, and whataboutisms when they try to argue something. Absolutely zero reading comprehension like you said. I honestly despise them and trying to have a discussion with a zoomie retard is exhausting and infuriating because their little pea brain runs itself in circles until they don’t know what’s what anymore and neither do you.

No. 86787


No. 86788

>>86785
>>86786
this is so boring. 8 years ago i was reading the same shit about my generation, only written by early millennials. you're not special because you're suddenly old enough to be making fun of the newer generation (which you're probably apart of, or close to it, i doubt you're anything older than an early gen Z or late late millennial)

No. 86789

File: 1732662638063.jpg (59.81 KB, 392x500, 3508439399_fab030ceed.jpg)


No. 86791

>>86786
theure all over /ot/, all tranny they/them threads, celebrity threads (celebricows, elon/grimes) jirai kei on /w/, the virgins arguing over their 2d porn and/husbando, theyre a cancer. they expect near constant replies like this is a chatroom for their short attention span or they whine the site is dying. they reply back with fury all triggered lso infighting as gone up.

No. 86793

>>86788
If you’ve yet to encounter one of these mind numbing mouth breathers, love that for you, but it’s definitely a problem unique to the newer generations that can hardly even read and comprehend books at a highschool level. It’s clearly a common issue on this site as of late and many of us find it frustrating. If it doesn’t apply, let it fly. I have different things to bitch about regarding my generation like the obsession with roleplay threads which bump out threads I actually care about or the framing of SW as based and liberating but that’s neither here nor there.

>t.a millennial

No. 86794

>>86788
other gen-z hate zoomers just as much, which is a new thing. zoomers aren't any gen-z they are the intolerable ones.

No. 86795

>>86754
Being one of the first posters to even shine the light on some of these girls lolicon tendencies with actual proof of actual lolicon merch they owned, I feel pointing at every single moe item they own and calling it lolicon just waters down anyone flagging the genuine lolicon shit as another baseless accusation made by a screaming harpy. As soon as you ask they validate their claim as to why they feel it’s lolicon, you are dog piled and accused of being a gooning coomer whose brain is fried from all the loli porn you own kek.

No. 86800

Could mods delete the irrelevant posts from the doodle board thread so anons can actually see the links to the boards and not some goofy back and forth, please and thank you?

No. 86801

>>86795
Not to mention these users on both the fashion and jirai kei threads are unintegrated as hell. Here is one poster >>>/w/339469 shitposting about what anons are saying in the fashion thread regarding the supposed "lolicon" images and bringing that sarcasm over to the JK thread. So not only are they watering down terms and infighting about it by saying everything that exists is lolicon (to the point that wearing pastels as an adult with pigtails, even without editing, is lolicon coded) that these girls do.

No. 86802

>>86801
Definitions have changed, apparently. Lolicon and pedopandering don't exist because terminally online twitards have been desensitized and decided it's justified because Japanese=good, and it works as a fine cope against their deathly fear of aging. How else are they going to bolster their chances to snag a marriage visa from a creepy Japanese moid and live out their days in perpetual arrested development as an influencer that offers absolutely nothing of value to the world at large? Good job twisting their words and gaslighting to make it seem like it's completely normal to have wall tapestries of little girls in seductive poses, but anyone with a functioning sense of reasoning can see for themselves no matter how you try to spin it.

No. 86803

>>86802
And yet who got banned?

No. 86804

I genuinely think that yuricoomer cringe thread going down was a psyop because it took the spamming of tranny yuri fetishists to get it taken down. Why not just ban the spammer? Why take down the entire thread? The actual solution seemed clear cut and dry, it just feels an excuse. 4chan jannies on blue boards handle pornspamming better than this, if they didn't then it would defeat the point of a blue board. Same premise, it's punishing many for the crimes of two people at most.

No. 86805

File: 1732683411136.jpg (83.66 KB, 750x537, 35411245.jpg)

>>86773
>she doesn't remember the husbando wars of 2023

No. 86806

>>86804
a yuri cringe thread still exists, it's on the media /m/ board here. You can go and post there, plus it's more chill and there are no yuripedos to spam that thread.

No. 86807

File: 1732686337401.png (204.05 KB, 665x433, xxxzcxzc.png)

Yuripedo spamming the yuri fandom crazies thread, she cannot help but avatarfag as one of her loli waifus everytime she shows up. Please begging farmhands to redtext her sperging instead of deleting it this time, it's funnier.

No. 86808

>>86803
nta but no matter how hard you deny it pedoshit is still pedoshit
>>86773
>pretending like threads don’t get derailed by anons calling someones husbando ugly
most of the fujo-related derails I’ve seen are because of some nonas hateboner for fujos

No. 86809

>>86804
Fujocoomer used to have actual milk in the past, but nowadays the thread is just vendetta screencaps of LC posts and tifs (seriously why do the tif fujos need to have a separate thread whereas tim himedanshis cant; not all tifs are fujos in the same way not all TIMs consume yuri and are hsts)
honestly having a fujocoomer cringe thread only emboldens nonas into being more malicious against women who happen to be fujoshi instead of disliking the content itself. Its not even about hating yaoi at this point anymore, its all about finding a moral high ground to look down on other women for being "moid centric"

No. 86812

File: 1732690454080.jpg (Spoiler Image,179.18 KB, 1170x1449, 1732648663997.jpg)

>>86801
>everything that exists is lolicon
No one said that, and you're conflating and twisting several arguments. The idol duo referenced in the thread styles and shoops themselves to look extra underage, whereas in a normal photo they look like 20 year old women and not uguu babies. Liking them wouldn't make someone pedo but it's not exactly a secret that jirais infantilize the hell out of themselves. Secondly, I guess we can keep ignoring the whole right side of picrel.(dragging infight to /meta/)

No. 86813

>>86804
Sounds like farmhands just got tired of babysitting retards and decided to nuke the thread instead. Not to mention that it was obvious fujos just made it as a vendetta thread to get back at yurifag anons, egging the infight even more. They haven't banned the yuri cringe thread on /m/ and anyone is free to post there so I don't know why fujosharts are still seething about this after a week still.

No. 86815

>>86812
this wasn’t the example that was used faggot. If it was there wouldn’t have been any argument. It had already been pointed out before that this person owned loli shit and there was no infighting over it because it was blatantly lolis. The point is anons keep posting any old shit of an anime girl with big boobs and pastel colors and going “omg a loli!” which is completely watering down the actual loli merch they own because now anyone reading would think it’s only about pastel colors and anime girls with uguu faces that makes them a lolicon and not the jojifuku girl wrapped in a jump rope that looks like an elementary school age child in bondage which is an issue. Then it ends up derailed on to moral fagging about Japanese men and Japanese Culture across 2 whole threads simultaneously like anyone with access to the internet wouldn’t already know the entirety of Japanese men are coombrained degenerates

No. 86816

>>86787
What am I meant to be seeing?

No. 86817

shouldnt the Yuri fandom crazies thread be moved to ot? Fandom Discourse and Fujocoomer cringe are also there because it's more so about the cows in the fandom itself then actually the media. I feel like /m/ should be one of the boards that doesn't involve that much gossip stuff about the people in the fandoms itself.

No. 86818

>>86817
It should, but the livestock owners of this site will never do it.

No. 86819

>>86815
It's the same wall at a different angle. You seem not to understand context. Let's be generous and say 4 out of 5 are just moe art. The artist in question has apparently drawn extreme loli art before, but because this time he added breasts to the same childlike proportions (in reference to the catgirl in white lingerie), it doesn't count anymore apparently? It seems that only art depicting minors up until middle school counts as loli to you although a man lusting after highschool girls still gets called a lolicon in Japan. Most normal people seeing that would still think it's creepy. Again, there's context. Having that art on the same wall shows a theme. She may not be a direct pedo or a lolicon but by proudly displaying that art she shows she's okay with it and likely self inserts through it like a lot of girls do these days but that's more of a complex subject so i'll spare you and myself the headache of drawing this out longer.(dragging infight to /meta/)

No. 86822

>>86812
This also is majority big tits moe girls. Come back with real pedo proof, newfag.

No. 86824

>>86822
Newfags are the ones considering this normal because not too long ago this would get you seriously side eyed and shamed for having the same taste as the average weebo pedomoid who loves his 1000 year old loli vampires but go off I guess.

No. 86825

File: 1732726934729.png (728.76 KB, 818x1022, hi-cow.png)

This post didn't suggest that the OP was Dana. It was pointing out that Dana was lurking that thread. Why did it get a "hi cow" ban?

No. 86826

File: 1732727921220.png (595.34 KB, 1152x1120, addressing-a-cow.png)

>>86825
Same fag. See all these other posts that mention Dana by name? Those aren't "hi cow posts," they weren't banned, and they shouldn't be. It makes no sense why that one was singled out.

No. 86827

>>86824
"Not too long ago" moids were allowed to post on lolcow (see the bottom of the /ot/ catalog). The site has never been moralfag land.

No. 86828

>>86827
It's not your safespace either. Some of us over the age of 25 weren't groomed by early exposure to coomshit in their fandom circles.

No. 86829

spoiler thread pic for Politician cringe thread on ot. There needs to be some rules and limits over what can be the thread pic, i don't want to see literal fetish content. Also i can't hide the thread if im browsing catalog. Either make it so you can hide threads while browsing catalog or make rules as to what how explicit a thread pic can be.

No. 86830

File: 1732730267105.png (143.82 KB, 524x343, Screen Shot 2024-11-27 at 12.5…)

>Suggestion
When there is a raid that happens, jannies should go through threads and check for stuff like picrel. This is the 5th time I've gone into a thread and seen nearly month old spam posts from a failed raid. I report them and they're deleted, but I really shouldn't have to report them to begin with. When there is a raid doesn't it make sense that farmhands should manually check threads to make sure to delete any spam posts? It makes staff seem lazy.

No. 86831

>>86824
If you was that much of an oldfag by now you would consider having coomer animu uguu waifu posters as lowtier milk. It’s not normal but in comparison to everything else they are doing it’s hardly milk to constantly sperg about in multiple threads on and on so unclutch your pearls whining about gen xyzqwerty faggotry you nasolabial fold having hag(infighting )

No. 86832

Someone needs to put a stop to janny newfaggotry, modding when you don't know basic terminology and messing up your bans and redtexts is embarrassing and retarded. Either go back or read up on site terminology here on meta. Also, stop making it so obvious when you get involved in infights.

No. 86833

>>86832
It's part of their plan to kill the site.

No. 86834

>>86831
>nasolabial fold having hag for not being an autopedo loser deathly afraid of aging and self inserting through moidtier coombait
Please. Go outside and touch some grass and stop being terminally online for a bit. That doesn't erase the loli posters right next to the just-moe-coombait on the walls. But keep astroturfing and hang whatever you want on your walls, I'm really done caring about this dead horse.

No. 86835

>>86824
Stfu lolifag. You're obsessed and you know very well its because of simple, non-loli coded things as well. Youve derailed two threads and now meta over this.(dragging infight to /meta/)

No. 86836

Maybe I’m just weird but the last 5-6 replies in the shay thread seem like a Samefagging robot kek.

No. 86839

>>86838
It was down for 4 hours

No. 86840

>>86839
Yes, which is over 3hs

No. 86841

>>86840
Sigh. Saying "over 3 hours" instead of rounding to the closest relevant time marker makes it sound like the event was shorter than it was.

No. 86842

the host seems to have technical issues every few months, idk much about internet stuff but is that normal?

No. 86843

>>86842
It's normal for image boards.

No. 86844

File: 1732762042468.jpg (81.86 KB, 925x338, 1000008309.jpg)

I hate the kid's on /w/

No. 86845

please do something about the autopedophile banning anyone who points out lolicon in /w/

No. 86848

>>86822
moeshit is pedophilic. also everyone going >b-but lolis don’t have boobs just be grateful that you haven’t heard of oppai loli

No. 86849

>>86822
It’s actually closer to 50% anon…

No. 86850

Honest question when does a personalityfag become a lolcow? Isnt finding out a anonymous ticks name and face and their accounts having milk defines them as cows? Haven't there been past lolcows who were personalityfags before?

No. 86852

>>86845
>>86848
>>86849
Need a farmhand to say if any of these posters is a samefag lol The pedofags who keep derailing need to be caged.

No. 86853

File: 1732790701799.jpeg (206.96 KB, 749x1458, IMG_4436.jpeg)

Is this thread a vendetta? I know its old but a still active instagram account has it linked in its bio for no reason and i thought it was weird, plus it's definitely attracting newfags and scrotes.
>>>/snow/1371005

No. 86854

>>86853
Oh that's really weird

No. 86855

>>86853
As far as i can tell, the account just post outdated memes about working in airlines. The lolcow link is so random kek.

No. 86856

>>86852
considering I have noticed most of the comments always happen in quick succession 2 minutes apart then nothing at all for hours, then several comments again 2 minutes apart in both /w/ and /meta/ I would say someone has been samefagging for the cause for quite a while

No. 86857

>>86856
Samefagging and they reply like they are using discord or comment sections from youtube/twitter/tiktok.

No. 86858

>>86857
Kek are you agreeing with me or you trying to pretend I’m also samefagging?

No. 86859

>>86858
Lol, sorry. I'm agreeing that they samefag considering how fast it goes. At least double posting.

No. 86860

>>86841
the site is back up were you literally counting the hours instead of doing something else. weird ass nitpick
>>86842
imageboards do not have the infrastructure of social media platforms run by Big Tech.

No. 86861

Do farmhands ignore the unpopular opinions thread now? I'm catching up to the thread and reading a 100 post derail from a day ago with no bans/redtext in sight.

No. 86864

File: 1732804822249.png (189.12 KB, 1080x500, image.png)

how is this bait when all of the things that anon listed is factual and a contribution to the discussion

No. 86865

>>86860
The hell? I saw on the status page that lolcow was down for 4 hours, and when I went to meta to see if they said anything else about the downtime, I found it strange that they said it was 3 hours. All I said was that it was 4 hours. No need to project your lolcow usage onto others.

No. 86866

>>86864
And what thread was this in?

No. 86867

can farmhands ban the fujo infighter already in the yuri fandom crazies thread already?

No. 86868

>>86864
if not bait then just mental retardation

No. 86869

>>86852
not a samefag. also “””“pedofag””” are you trying to accuse the anons calling out pedoshit of being pedos themselves?

No. 86872

can you ban yurifags from the yuri crazies thread? they shit up the thread to defend their pedo discord mommy and are incapable of taking criticism. I dont know why they think its a thread for yurifags when the thread was started to make fun of them.

No. 86873

>>86872
>t. the fujolard that got assmad after anons and mods told her to stop infighting

No. 86874

>>86873
See? this is how they act. Childish pathetic behaviour.

No. 86875

>>86874
>anyone I don't like is a yuri/yumefag
Typical fujo persecution complex

No. 86876

>>86875
i never even claimed to be a fujo lol you are just schizo

No. 86877

>>86872
how would that rule even be enforced? If you mean yuri WKs sure they can just hide the thread if they dont like it but you can't ban himejos from the yuricoomer thread when theyre the ones providing most of the insider milk kek

No. 86878

>>86877
ban wks and yurifags outting themselves, simple as. Also its not true that most posts are ''insider milk'' i posted like half the milk on the thread and i am not a hime, i just lurk /a/ too much.

No. 86879

>>86878
Sure why not, just dont be so sharp with your words lest it turns into another vendetta thread and it gets closed. We can be civil about pointing out infighters who are clearly instigating a fight in order to intentionally close the thread. Just sit back and let the milk come in and report WKs, you dont have to reply a snarky comeback in order to prove your point.

No. 86880

There are so many retards in the Shay thread blogging about showing their family and moids the hog

No. 86881

File: 1732839012582.jpg (47.91 KB, 536x470, 1000029319.jpg)

>>86880
Why?!

No. 86882

>>86878
>wks and yurifags
And? Where are these wks and yurifags? It's obvious you just want another fandom discourse thread for your fujo circlejerk where you can post your retarded twitter slapfight screenshots from literal 16 year olds. There is a reason why mods kept the thread on /m/ and never moved it to /ot/

No. 86883

>>86882
not exactly a wk/yurifag but nonas saying they want to fuck yuripedo or find her attractive is getting redundant and encouraging the personalityfag. if you have to confess this take it to /g/

No. 86884

Infestation of blogging in the shay thread

No. 86886

Fujosperg derailing and infighting in gender ideology hate thread

No. 86889

farmhands confirmed to be autopedophiles.

No. 86890

Moid in ugly man psyops calling us eugenists, sperging about Jews kek

No. 86892

>>86886
Pretty sure it's one anon that is sperging about fujos across multiple threads.

No. 86894

>>86892
Fujos started the infight by getting offended when nonnas said yaoi objectively is the reason many TIFs troon out, though

No. 86895

>>86894
why are fujos always escaping their containment thread

No. 86897

>>86894
A fujo randomly said the only manga genre that should come out of Japan is yaoi, that was the first post about yaoi in the thread, it was so unwarranted. Then they acted like it was actually the antifujos who started it

No. 86898

>>86894
>nonnas said yaoi objectively is the reason many TIFs troon out
This is starting an infight, the thread was also talking about a ftm that posted a manga about she was struggling mentally after getting sexually assaulted so it was frankly a pretty retarded take to have, that bl was objectively the reason.

No. 86899

>>86890
He's still going. You're not beating the trannyjanny allegations any time soon.
>>86897
Oh my god, will you quit wking/victimizing yourself? An anon replied something like "good luck on your transition" which delved into a whole spergout from fujos. Learn2ignore instead of seething, you already know gender ideology hate thread isn't fujo general.

No. 86900

>>86894
If you read the comic detailing the author getting sexually assaulted by men and arrived to the conclusion that yaoi was why she trooned out, you have brainworms.

No. 86901

>>86897
It was an offhand reply to a post about a shounen mangaka being convicted of pedophilia. Frankly, it should've just been ignored.

No. 86902

>>86898
>Staring the truth is starting an infighting.
You're too sensitive for this website and especially gender critical threads. Stick to your fujo containment ones if you're this easily triggered because fujos themselves admit most of them transitioned due to yaoi. The manga author isn't a TIF, she's non-binary, and she's addicted to gay porn by her own admission so it was a relevant conversation. Nobody denied the fact that the sexual harassment she experienced was the main reason in her case, either

No. 86903

>>86900
That wasn't my conclusion nor how the infight actually started, we had moved way past her manga atp.
>>86901
But you can't ignore the objectively true observation that there's a fujoshi to TIF pipeline? No, you always have to victimize yourselves and derail every thread defending your sodomite porn

No. 86904

>>86902
>You're too sensitive for this website
Says the anon that couldn't let someone replying to a pedo post pass up kek. Maybe you should stick to the antifujo containment thread if you don't want people calling you out for blaming a woman's mental breakdown on gay porn rather than nearly getting raped in a shower.

No. 86905

>>86899
>Learn2ignore instead of seething
I did ignore it, but the same thing could be said about the fujos who replied and kept infighting even when other posts were less insulting and more objective

No. 86906

>>86905
"Good luck on your transition" and projecting how others are going to trans out is not ignoring, please learn to have some self awareness.

No. 86907

>>86904
>Says the anon that couldn't let someone replying to a pedo post pass up kek.
Huh? I don't know who you're confusing me with but I don't care enough about you retards to post in a thread about it, in fact I'd like to stop hearing from you at all.
>>86905
Yeah… that's what I'm saying. All fujospeds should've ignored it. Is everyone ITT retarded except me?
>>86906
She really made you seethe, huh? Cope kek %99 of TIFs themselves admit yaoi made them troon out.

No. 86908

The fujo obsessed retard keeps shitting up unrelated threads on /m/. Please start banning that fucker because it feels like every damn thread gets derailed by her.

>>86894
Shut up and stop lying, no one is buying your schizo ramblings and samefagging anymore. Fujos rarely go out of containment, instead it's you who brings tif/tranny and yaoi talk into every fucking thread, even ones that are completely unrelated. Go back to kiwifarms, seriously.

No. 86910

>>86906
I'm not the one who posted that. Most of us ignored the yaoi shilling post except for that one autist, I'm saying that the fujos who kept replying to that bait should listen to your own advice and ignore clearly inflammatory posts and report them instead
>>86908
It's both actually, this may surprise you but there are infighting spergs from both sides, and both of them claim the farmhands are persecuting them (they may even be the same person idk). Both should be banned

No. 86911

kpop in ugly man psyop thread again

No. 86912

/pol/tard in the vent thread

No. 86913

>>86910
Sydney "whiteknight" who is definitely not her has returned to the JC thread once again

No. 86914

Personalityfag derailing /ot/

No. 86915

>>86914
Which thread?

No. 86916

Super retarded infighting happening in the ugly man psyop thread

No. 86917

baiting tradfag in amerifag thread

No. 86919

This is 100% the moid that Kinpatsu stopped dating. This is Eric. He's been defending himself in the cosplay thread for over a week now. You can tell it's a moid because he's calling the new guy out and suddenly between the "Why do we need to choose who is worse?" he defends Eric, the ex non-stop, while calling his ex mid. I have never, ever seen a farmer who is a female call a woman 'mid'. This is a very moid-centered way of talking about women and the whole paragraph is clearly him trying to defend himself and shit on his ex girlfriend and her new boyfriend.

>>>/w/339584 I think most anons already knew he was posting about himself in the thread previously. Makes sense why it's a massive wall of text because he got banned for not integrating before. He's learning, but he's so obviously Eric. Also not posting proof of any of these claims that Kinpatsu is mentally unable to care for herself to the degree of a 13 year old girl? What fucking shitpost crap is that? You can't tell me that's not a salty male behind those words.

No. 86920

I think the attractive male photo dumps in the ugly man psyop are better suited in the ideal man bodies thread. It doesnt really add to the discussion of ugly men being shilled as attractive imo

No. 86922

>>86783
ban evading antiabortion tradthot or moid in amerifag at it again

No. 86923

>>86922
Other anon here and seconded on that, there is a scrote in the americafag thread roleplaying as a elderly woman and shitting up the whole.

No. 86924

>>86923
would not be surprised if it was actually some retarded old woman because lolcow gets posted alot on xitter and sites like ovarit because it's female only

No. 86926

>>86895
because it’s not a containment?

No. 86927

>>>/m/434062
never ban anyone in the pokemon thread again if you farmhands allow an entire thread to be taken over by this "yuripedo" person

No. 86928

tranny in the stupid questions thread in ot

No. 86929

The moid in cosplay is flying off the handle because no one gives AF about their Kinpatsu tirade about tattoos. Really weak milk to assume fetishes from people because they don't have any other milk. Very clear they aren't happy anons aren't agreeing with them.
>>>/w/339628

No. 86931

>>86929
Just to add, I don't know why her new boyfriend is being brought up anyway either. He doesn't cosplay and he's unrelated to her milk which is anons making fun of her bad editing for onlyfans content. The reason it comes off as the jealous ex-boyfriend is because the new boyfriend, Nate, is constantly being brought up and jabbed at. The rules about involving people who aren't the cow are constantly broken with this user and the tinfoiling about the tattoo fetish is a really bad attempt at making him relevant or milky. None of which it is. It's been going on for over a week now that Nate keep being brought up when there's no milk or cosplay related content about him being posted.

No. 86932

The infight is still ongoing in the ugly man pysop thread. People are insulting eachother for having different types.

No. 86933

There's been a massive influx of newfags over the past few days and they're shitting up every thread they come across. Please bring back hellweek, this is getting unbearable

No. 86934

>>86933
The hellweek earlier this year, probably the strongest/strictest one ever, didn't do shit. There needs to be a new method.

No. 86935

>>86934
Well we already all know the method: ban VPNs. So far afaik two threads had a VPN ban in the last 2-4 weeks, and it worked wonders for those threads.

No. 86936

ayrt, I saw an anon mention potentially scrubbing lolcow from google search results and that might quell some of it but the problem is a lot of these cows deserve to be one click away from all their craziness being on display. It's frustrating because you're right, the last hell week really didn't work. It really feels like there's no solution here and it sucks

No. 86937

>>86935
If a full scale VPN ban is what it takes to clean up this place it needs to be implemented

No. 86938

>>86937
Nta but imo it should only be applied to the cow boards, /ot/, and the hidden board

No. 86939

>>86938
who will post on the cow boards without a vpn?

No. 86940

>>86939
They could at least try it temporarily. A lot of these newfags are hypersensitive to rejection and it probably wouldn't take more than one ban and getting locked out permanently to drive them away

No. 86941

there is a generation alpha hate thread on /ot/ and that generation is literally under the age of 14 right now. what is happening to this site?

No. 86942

>>86941
Zoomers. And I don't mean Gen Z as a whole, some of them are as old as 27. Teens and early 20s retards are pouring in here and refusing to integrate.

No. 86943

Ban evader in cosplay thread still.please put the moid out of his misery.

No. 86944

>>86939
I will

No. 86945

whoever hired those new ot farmhands put them to pasture already they fucking suck ass, obvious tranny/racebait posts stay longer than needed and personalityfags are allowed to roam free.

No. 86946

please stop ignoring my reports of endless derailing in radfems thread

No. 86948

Can we ban the sperg going off on “women” about abortion? I just scrolled through like two days of derailing pro life garbage.

No. 86949

>>86948
just curious but what thread?

No. 86950

Why have the farmhands labelled dorians ana pics fishing thread as a shit thread but not locked it? Shes already discussed in the alt cows thread and its clear the thread wasnt set up to discuss her, strange decision by farmhands.

No. 86952

newfags posting Jill's mom and her facebook account and links to her brother's youtube. Why do farmers do the most retarded shit lately? >>>/w/339698

No. 86953

>>86948
if you're referring to the discussions about abortion in the amerifags thread, laws surrounding abortion and american citizens personal feelings on them are a really popular topic on /ot/, and it has been for many years. so long as anons are speaking in a civil manner and communicating reasonably, it does not go against any /ot/ rules to discuss abortion with differing opinions. i did notice a few bans were handed out last night during the previous infight, and i notice the conversation reawakened within the last few hours which insinuates that any bans likely expired by now.

No. 86954

>>86950
They've been choosing to keep a lot of bad snow threads unlocked for some reason

No. 86955

>>86945
it feels like the mods have been asleep for a while or have simply given up

No. 86956

>>86948
God, yes. They post circular arguments so people will respond, they sleep for 6-8 hours, and then come back and do the same thing.

No. 86959

Jannies there are two 139 MTF threads and they are both open pls lock one of them thnx.

No. 86961

>>86783
CP(?) on front page

No. 86963

Discordfags reappeared in the dead venus thread

No. 86966

Love the snowflakes

No. 86967

racebaiter in amerifag thread

No. 86968

Those snowflakes are slowing down my browser, thanks a lot. Every day are the poorfags oppressed because we couldn’t suck off a crack addict for PC parts

No. 86969

>>86968
chill retard lmao

No. 86970

>>86968
You can press the big snowflake to make it disappear

No. 86971

Why are /ot/ jannies so lazy and retarded?? kick this retard out already, they're not even moderating. I'm tired of reporting posts only for them to never get redtexted, and in the rare chance they do, it's 48 hours later.
And I'm not forgetting when you let a baiting moid sperg about how we were all licherally nazi eugenics for not wanting to breed with ugly moids shit up ugly man psyops for DAYS, and the scrote literally never got banned. He announced his leave all on his own on LC graduation party saying we made him mald too hard with the transphobia and misandry. Thanks for nothing, trannyjannies, guess we don't need you to put moids out to pasture after all.

No. 86972

Ember Whann is writing ChatGPT odes to herself in /snow/ >>>/snow/2063807 >>>/snow/2063797

No. 86973

>>86963
Lol they are samefagging, posting tinfoil, and moralfagging themselves

No. 86974

File: 1733127963444.jpeg (17.86 KB, 678x452, Grinchy nona.jpeg)

>>86968
>t.
But really, as a poorfag to another poorfag the solution is easy and also yearly so why aren't you used to this?

No. 86976

Fujohater is escaping containment once again in tropes thread in /m/, going off about pseudo males or whatever her fetish is.

No. 86977

Consider locking the Venus Nagelic thread. Its only her discordfags in there defending themselves and posting non-venus screencaps of random accounts repeatedly

No. 86978

Sorry if what I posted is too much but there was a good intent

No. 86979

File: 1733165564023.gif (38.51 KB, 169x169, 1000003290.gif)

it would be kind of cool to have a meta thread dedicated to listing/sharing new threads.
it would make it easier for nonas to point each other in the right direction when finding a topic and would give new threads some more traction.

No. 86980

File: 1733166193787.png (50.58 KB, 1816x382, locking warning.png)

for the last 4 jill threads, newfags have been replying after the 1200 post locking warning and the new thread isnt able to be linked as a reply

i understand it's not enforceable, but fwiw would it ever be possible for the warning language to be changed slightly so they know not to comment?

No. 86981

>>86980
yes please, this annoys me so much

No. 86982

>>86979
Just use the catalog and the search function.

No. 86983

>>86980
So??? Just make a new thread. You can at least leave the old thread link in the new OP. This isn't something that's an issue, threads are allowed to be maxed. This is some really nitpicky shit and Ive been using lolcow for like 10 years.

No. 86984

>>86980
It's actually the job of the person making the new thread to post the link before the thread is maxed out.

No. 86985

>>86983
the warning itself says to post a link to the new thread so thats why i asked
>>86984
i agree, i think the issue is jills thread specifically seems to have an overwhelming amount of newfags since the DID saga. since we recap thread highlights in the new thread description, it can take a bit and seems like the threadnonas cant get the threads made before its maxed

No. 86986

All day,

I've been seeing people type out posts,

like this, hitting enter after nearly every sentence.

Is typing like this okay now?

I always thought it was a sign

of non-integration?

No. 86987

>>86986
beautiful poem, nona

No. 86988

>>86982
i'm not saying i'm looking for a thread, i can find threads just fine. i just saw a new thread that seemed useful and some nonas might not realize they wanted a thread unless they saw it. like a "i didn't know i needed this, but i do" type thing

No. 86989

>>86987
Thanks. From now on, I'm gonna hit enter after every sentence since integration isn't important anymore. Watch the jannies ban me for it! In the appeal I'll link to all the posts I reported for it that weren't banned.

No. 86990

infighting and moralfagging about fujos jn the stupid questiins thread.
pls just ban antifujo retards at this point. they simply can't keep it in their containment thread.

No. 86991

>>86990
Kek of course you speshul snowflakes are immediately running to the jannies to cry about it

No. 86992

Please delete discordfag posts in venus thread

No. 86993

Laur Trueman on the loose in Lillee Jean's thread again

No. 86994

personalityfag in fandom discourse thread

No. 86995

cp in bad art thread

No. 86996

Vain bitching happening in GIOYC, I reported the posts.

No. 86997

>>86994
since theyre still up… can you please delete personalityfag posts instead of slapping a witty redtext on them? they want the special mod treatment and can easily evade the ban anyways, so the only way to get rid of them is to nip them by the bud and remove their means of getting any attention.

No. 86998

yuripedo still ban evading in the fandom discourse thread. Please bring back the vpn ban in the fandom discourse thread.

No. 86999

>>86994
>>86998
I really dont want to be a minimod but holy shit this is a new low for nonnie retardation. Im assuming mods are asleep and cant do immediate action but holy fuck can they not see the blatant personalityfag in front of them and learn to disengage and report for just a couple minutes? Are they that desperate to post a witty comeback as an "own" to someone intentionally fishing for bait?? these shitty newfags are a plague on this site, and they're clearly showing their zoomer tendency to dramaseek and attentionwhore.
If VPN bans aren't going to be enforced, they should at least do a 1-2 minute cooldown between posts so nonas can actually contemplate about hitting send instead of rapid firing shitposts made during the heat of the moment.

No. 87000

>>86999
>Im assuming mods are asleep
When aren't they? Every day it's the same routine, spend an 2-3 hours online responding to reports, then close the tab and disappear for 16-21 hours.

No. 87001

>>86999
>>87000
Jesus go touch grass. I'd be more worried if they were completely unresponsive on cow boards or left cp up for hours on end

No. 87004

>>87001
thanks for admitting that you are a newfag but the reason why there is less child abuse material on lolcow now has nothing to do with the moderation and has more to do with the tech team who implemented a software here to catch those types of images that majority of the time here got spammed by bots.
Before that got implemented some of those images would stay up here for hours until a mod would check up on the reports.

No. 87005

>>87001
Have you not seen the recent complaints of unintegrated tourists shitting up cow threads dragging their regina george persona along over to snow and post constant unsaged nitpicks or non-milk. They culled dumbass shit because it promoted this behaviour onto cow threads, why can't we point out this pattern happening again?

No. 87006

>>87005
It's kinda their fault for allowing twitter-esque topics like fandom discourse thread to be on this site, which of course attracts twitterfags

No. 87007

There has been an uptick of people going absolutely wild on pedophilia accusations. Whether it's about 2D characters or how some anons only accept the sperm of 18-23 year old 3DPD men, these "pedo hunters" are quick to call them everything under the sun, shaming, screeching, and all but sending tips to the FBI over some anon talking how much she wants to get fucked by some anime character still in high school.

No. 87008

>>87006
i know you're one of those retards who wants to nuke the activity of this site or only allow cow boards but you have to realise that cow culture is dying, no one gives a fuck about any of the cows in snow, pt or w anymore. Only like 4 threads out of the whole cow boards are active and 2 of them are about troons.

No. 87009

File: 1733198786721.png (581.98 KB, 1200x962, 461783483218487.png)

>>86997
….and they redtext a single post and left the other posts unaccounted for the night. do mods not know that having a unique redtext for personalityfags is giving them the attention they seek by having their alias kept up and known?

No. 87012

>>87009
That's a troll twitter. Are you serious?

>>86985
Its never been that deep. Ive never seen anyone banned or complaints for that matter, over this. You sound like a newfag who's latched onto Jill on this site.

No. 87013

>>87008
nta but if fandom discourse infighting is the only thing keeping you here, then you all really need your own separate board or website to congregate together elsewhere and stop shitting up other threads with your faggotry. You contribute nothing essentially.

No. 87014

Is this anons admitting to not caring if Taylor has milk or not and instead just posting tinfoils to use the thread as some sort of archive? >>>/w/339874

No. 87015

>>87012
nona…. it’s a meme

No. 87016

>>86977
Don't respond to them if they're derailing the thread, report and move on, it's not that hard.
Venus is a legacy cow, even if she's milkless these days there's no way her thread would be lock.

No. 87017

>>87007
This. I know other nonas wanted that yuri cringe thread, but some of the worst offenders of this are in that thread and the creation of that thread was a bad idea in the first place. Most of that thread is just derailing complaining about lolis and discussing personalityfags.

No. 87018

>>87017
they keep shitting up the tropes thread too (like calling an anon pedo for finding a character funny? and one for discussing a character's personality, and too many other examples)

No. 87019

I suggest unsaging dumbass shit.

No. 87020

>>87017
>M-muh yuri cringe thread please delete it
The fujocoomer thread has a staunch tradition of accusing fujos and aidens of being pedophiles spanning for literal years, that's literally Paki-chan's modus operandi as well.

No. 87021

>>87020
She's talking about the old Yuri cringe thread made by fujoshits who just created it as a vendetta thread against a single personalityfag. It got locked because it was obvious they just wanted a thread to extend their retarded infight.

No. 87023

Unintegrated posting, obvious male (deleted bc mistake)
>>>/g/448120
>>>/g/447291

No. 87024

maybe all the ot threads that bring newfags going full retard should be sage'd.

No. 87025

>>87024
I second something needs to happen with /ot. Now there’s a nazi sperg. Feels sus.

No. 87026

When will Kinpatsu/spookykins be getting her own thread?

No. 87027

Bj chan baiting in unpopular opinions for literal hours

No. 87028

>>87027
Not just unpopular opinions, someone is really off her bippie meds today. Every second thread has weird over-the-top hostile replies.

No. 87029

hey the unpopular opinions thread is filled with racebait, pol-sperging and bj-chan getting out of her containment thread.

Please add a vpn ban on the unpopular opinions thread, i don't know why you keep on ignoring us and our pleads. A vpn ban on threads that attract bait would help curb down on the bait so much.

I don't know why you keep ignoring the userbase, not only has the moderation become slow these past three days but you keep ignoring anons that are fucking BEGGING you to add a vpn ban because the threads are unusable. Totally ignoring the whole userbase.

No. 87030

>>87028
yeah the site is unusable today, it's not worth looking at any thread. Sometimes i feel like there is someone in the LC team trying to purposely let this site go to shit.

No. 87031

>>87030
Just today? LC has been unmoderated for weeks, I'm hoping this is just for the holidays and they'll get back on track but some of these jannies need to get the boot.

No. 87032

>>87031
they just need to implement a permanent vpn ban in the america, unpopular opinions and fandom thread.

Also the vpn ban has been proven to work since the america and fandom threads were normal when they were under the vpn ban. I don't know why mods won't implement something that has been proven to work and be effective at curbing bait.

No. 87033

>>87021
obviously she’s not

No. 87034

>>87031
Just weeks? It started to get really bad in late July.

No. 87037

>>87026
I want the ex boyfriend posts reveal. He's making it so clear it's him. He can't integrate and can't stand anons pointing out who he is. It's resulted in a reverse-uno "No, YOU'RE the cow" accusations when he's been wrong over and over. Eric keeps mentioning fetishes and how Nate took advantage of her and is forcing her to be a "sex doll". Really gross descriptions from a jealous male. An isolated thread for all this would be fantastic.

No. 87038

>>87032
mods would never listen to retards like you because they know site-wide vpn ban would kill this entire imageboard. everyone would migrate elsewhere and all that would be left is you and a handful of others dying to be left alone in an echochamber.(ban evading baiter)

No. 87039

>>87038
>13% of posts made in a 2 week period were made through a VPN.
>But if we ban VPNs, the entire imageboard would die.
You're so smelly go wash your ass please

No. 87040

>>87039
>implying people weren't constraining themselves more often than usual
give it a proper test, month or two and you'll see how dead the site is then you stupid monkey.(ban evading baiter)

No. 87041

Thank you for deleting personalityfag posts!

No. 87042

>>87038
why do you people always whine about "killing" the site?

No. 87043

>>87038
nowhere did i even mention a sitewide vpn ban, i just said certain threads. You lack reading comprehension and sound like a defensive baiter, probably one of the ban evading ones who doesn't want their privilege of ip hoping to be removed.

No. 87044

Dana is 100% self posting and responding to bait in the poly thread, is it possible for mods to reveal her posts so she quits shitting it up?

No. 87045

>>87044
Someone made a thread specifically for her when most anons agreed it was a bad idea. She's enjoying the attention and it's just encouraging her, it's also attracting redditfags in droves

No. 87046

Hellweek. VPN ban. Scrub lolcow from google search results. Do something, please. Shit threads everywhere, newfags everywhere, this is unbearable

No. 87048

>>87046
>Scrub lolcow from google search results
You do know what that means dont you? Dont go giving the snakepist any ideas

No. 87049

>>87045
Yeah it’s out of control. Hell Week for Christmas?

No. 87050

>>87048
there must be a way to de-prioritize the off topic boards specifically, like celebricows brings in a steady stream of tarded twitter newfags constantly.

No. 87051

>>87050
Yeah, I sent a letter to Mr. Google about it but he never wrote me back. Something tells me that Big Internet is trying to destroy Lolcow.

No. 87052

>>87049
Oh I wonder what santamin will bring for me!

No. 87053

>>87050
This would never happen but what if the non cow boards were hidden? In that scenario newfags looking for "femcel 4chan" would either get invested in a cow and be forced to integrate or get bored and leave.

No. 87054

>>87053
theres enough traffic on /ot/ to warrant it being hidden imo.

No. 87055

>>87050
A Google search about onision brought me here in like 2014. Honestly who cares if others come here from Google to gossip as long as they integrate. Which I understand is what you're complaining about the lack of integration. Perhaps mods should give us by balls in mini modding when farmhands don't seem active and clean up the spam if it derails too much. I have no idea why integration is so bad. Can american literacy rates be blamed?

No. 87056

>>87053
The idea of hiding /ot/ isn't new. I think the last time it was seriously discussed was when /ot/ was locked under one of the previous admins.

I would support a trial of hiding the non-cow boards to see if it does anything to improve post quality.

No. 87057

>>87020
AYRT, it's funny that you'd assume that I'm fujo-biased just because of this post. I dislike both the fujocoomer and recent yuri thread and think they encourage braindead infighting in different ways. The concept of a yuri general rather than a "yuri cow thread" is ideal (and has been attempted IIRC?), but would encourage troon/moid activity, so I understand why it isn't a thing like the BL general. In reality, I feel bad for himejoshi, because it's harder for them to curate women-only communities like the fujos (who have their own fujo imageboard containment zone).

No. 87058

>>87057
ntayrt, i guess its a kneejerk reaction since most self proclaimed himejo on this site are very vocal about being anti-fujo and gatekeepy about yuri content along with bragging about their "moral high ground" since theyre not into "scrote centered" media.
Its discouraging to discuss yuri topics when theres this expectation to be a gold star lesbian who only consumes GL and nothing else. I personally tinfoil theyre just lesbian yumejo who heavily self project onto the media they consume which is why they cant see GL content as a story telling media that anyone can enjoy/create regardless of sexual orientation

No. 87059

>>87057
We have a Yuri general for over a year now, it's just dead as fuck because there's maybe 3 himes on this site.

No. 87060

Is "uwu" (used ironically) really considered an emoticon? I've just seen someone catch a redtext for it but I could swear it gets used all the time.

No. 87061

Can a farmhand come get this schizo troon or /2X/ escapee or whatever it is out of the stupid questions thread?
>>>/ot/2289052
>>>/ot/2289060
>>>/ot/2289075
>>>/ot/2289081
>>>/ot/2289148
>>>/ot/2289149
It's starting to doublepost and shit up the thread with its attention whoring.

No. 87062

>>87061
>it
Assuming this is bp-chan, she is actually a female

No. 87063

>>87059
>because there's maybe 3 himes on this site.
word and this is also lolcow so 2 of those himes are going to try and infight with you about stupid shit if you try to post there.

No. 87064

>>87060
its an emoticon which isnt allowed

No. 87065

>>>/pt/948870
>>>/pt/948869
Is this not doxxing? I hate the Trumans as much as anyone else, but both pictures have their address listed. I reported them yesterday but they are still up. Am I missing something?

No. 87066

>>87065
Eviction or not, yeah thats doxxing.

No. 87067

>>87065
>>87066
The images were censored after they were first reported, unless we have missed information somewhere, the address should be removed from both images.

No. 87068

>>87067
My bad, I refreshed everything and see the addresses blocked out now. Thanks!

No. 87069

>>87062
how do we know for sure it’s a female?

No. 87070

>>87069
Catch up on your personalityfag lore.

No. 87071

Can you do something about the retard that's been spamming posts in Funny Caps for the past few days and baiting for infights? It's getting annoying. It's like a failed personalityfag.

No. 87072

The azelia banks spergs in celebritycows are pissing me off. She’s not a celeb anymore and her shit always triggers a based-not based discussion. It’s not milk either what she’s posting on Twitter.

No. 87073

>>87071
what do you consider funny anon? reddit shit?

No. 87074

>>87070
can you read it all out loud for me on the phone while i fall asleep every night

No. 87075

>>87074
Okay. Is your info in the Friend Finder thread?

No. 87076

>>87038
>>87040
>noooo don’t vpn ban certain threads you’re gonna make it harder to bait- I mean kill the site noooo
>ban evading baiter
every time kek

No. 87077

>>87076
It's not even discreet at this point.

No. 87078

>>87040
vpns have been banned on 4chan for like 8 years and nothing changed there

No. 87079

>>87061
Thank you, farmhands.
>>87062
Sorry anon, I miss personalityfags whenever they're active so I don't know too many of them. I know of rancefag, yuripedo, that self-obsessed faggot who spam posts every now and then, and kirby anon. But I don't know their posting history or anything like that. Not sure who bp-chan is, but I'm aware there is an anon obsessed with fellatio, specifically concerning women.
I couldn't tell if this was a troon larping as a depressed blackpilled anon, or one of those extremely mentally ill anons who can't stop themselves from sperging. I just wanted the retard shitting up the thread gone, and the bait with it. Thanks again, farmhands.

No. 87080

>>87073
nta but it really has nothing to do with whether or not the screenshots are funny, but that the person is spamming the thread and not even attempting to maintain anonymity

No. 87081

there is a moid in the american threads openly declaring himself as one and using ''femoid''

No. 87082

moid in amerifag thread

No. 87083

>>87080
Multiple anons use the jungle theme

No. 87085

You need to have a talk with the newfag jannies already, I recall seeing multiple posts wrongfully redtexted as (integrate) when anons were clearly using caps or emojis ironically, which usually doesn't get redtexted. This janny has to be a turboautist not to notice when nonnies are joking.

No. 87086

>>87085
Where?

No. 87087

>>87083
It's not just that. It's the fact that it's the same style, the same file name format, the same 8th grader sense of humour, and the same compulsion to infight. It's very obviously one anon with personal issues, most likely mentally slow.

No. 87088

Can you make a rule banning low IQ posters? Can I report people for being sub 80? Mods?

No. 87089

>>87088
You'd end up banning the entire userbase

No. 87090

>>87083
I have to agree with other anon here. I was watching as those posts were made and then the subsequent infight. If you read the thread back, you can tell it's a single tard shitting the thread up. The posting is all very low effort though, it's kind of strange.

No. 87091

>>87071
The retard that's doing it evaded the ban and is still doing it.

No. 87092

Worst infight of all time happening in amerifag thread
>>87088
Sometimes I just put "retard" in there and mods get the jist. Retards are basically baiters

No. 87093

>>87092
damn already? the new thread has only been up for a couple hours…

No. 87094

>>87093
So many newfags attracted to that thread

No. 87095

>>87069
I've spoken to her offsite.

No. 87096

The blackpill anon has escaped again to rant in the unpopular opinions thread.

No. 87098

Can we delete the cat and dog hate threads? Dog hate one isn’t so bad but the cat hate one is full of zoosadists that openly brag about killing cats. If people wanna talk about this they can fuck off to Reddit surely? What’s the point in them?

No. 87100

>>87098
can not second this hard enough like can’t we just report and delete if they escape their container? why do we have to see shit like that? there’s clearly something so wrong with them and i haven’t even read the posts she’s talking about. it’s not normal to want to harm animals. there’s something really wrong with them and they should be banned from interacting with the rest of us.

No. 87101

>>87098
>>87100
Just hide the freaking threads. All you're doing is bringing more attention to them. If this is about the posts in the unpopular opinions thread, learn2scroll and don't engage. Report any infights and move on. We are on lolcow.farm, if you see an anon start with "I think dogs are overrated and they suck really bad, here is why-" scroll past the post. Report for "breaking containment" if you feel the need. Not everything requires your constant attention and monitoring.

No. 87102

File: 1733406083063.jpeg (199.96 KB, 915x375, IMG_0301.jpeg)

>>87100
>>87101
Doing that is even worse because then stuff like this gets left up and unchallenged.

No. 87103

File: 1733406119417.jpeg (1.06 MB, 975x2182, IMG_0300.jpeg)


No. 87104

>>87103
>>87102
Serial killer vibes

No. 87105

>>87103
Typical dogfaggot getting angry at superior animals but not the shitbeast that licks its balls and eats its feces(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 87106

>>87103
>the shelter can't even take anymore cats because they have too many
Too many shitbulls, they mean. They're the real issue since they get resources wasted on them keeping them alive and stuck in cages/cells for years on end while more adoptable cats and dogs get the shot immediately but anyway.

No. 87107

why do farmhands refuse to lock the skirby thread despite it being a magnet for morons who refuse to integrate and do nothing but make low quality posts? there is not a single drop of milk in that thread. can a farmhand provide some insight as to why they quickly lock other low quality/milkless threads on cow boards but the skirby one gets special treatment?

No. 87109

>>87103
nitpick but calling cats shitbeasts is a bit unoriginal and retarded. Dogs are literal shitbeasts because they look like, smell like, and eat their own shit. At least call cats pissbeasts since that's what they'd be more associated with.

No. 87110

>>87107
The thread is so bad. She doesn't have milk besides making fun of new random photos she defends. She didn't need her own thread. She doesn't have drama related to her.

No. 87111

>>87107
Because the farmhands are retards and this place has gone to shit. The most innocuous things will get you a ban if one of them is feeling bitter but entire threads of pure unintegrated cancer are perfectly fine apparently

No. 87112

>>87098
The dog hate thread is mostly sane as it's focused on pitbulls, the stupidity of shitbull owners and the need to euthanize dogs that are dangerous. The cat hate thread is unhinged and wishes actual abuse on animals.

No. 87113

>>87105
>>87106
>>87109
you’re also weird

No. 87118

>>87101
the animal hate threads don't talk about animals being "overrated". nobody would have a problem with them if they did.
the dog one has a schizo who obsessively follows, screenshots, and rants about Facebook posts and how happy she is when a dog dies. she can't even contain herself to a single thread. the cat hate thread is full of zoosadists.

No. 87119

can mods redtext the word 'coded' like femcelcoded or retardcoded

No. 87120

>>87118
I've seen her posts when I scroll by the dog hate thread. She is posting Facebook posts by people trying to adopt out pitbulls who have a history of aggression and biting. Dogs are meant to be put down when they attack people because they are a danger. Pitbulls are understood to be the most dangerous because they have locking jaws and are bred to be fighting dogs with heightened aggression.
Anons discuss news stories about pitbulls ripping the legs off newborns, and mauling and dismembering their owners obviously they are going to be happy when a dangerous animal like this is put down instead of being adopted out. They aren't breaking any rules. The zoosadist who wrote the post about raping cats was put out to pasture by the farmhands.
Misrepresenting the threads like this, whether moralfagging or illiteracy, doesn't help anything. These threads have been around for years, and learning how to hide threads you don't like to see is part of integration. If you can't handle that responsibility, maybe sites like Twitter or Tumblr where you can report posts for "disturbing content" would suit you better.

No. 87121

>>87118
those anons scare me. It's one thing to not like dogs/cats, but they sound like the retards who like animal torture videos, it's disgusting. zoosadists please go back to /an/

No. 87122

>>86954
Glad i'm not the only one who noticed, I dont get why though? Doesnt that just encourage more vendetta/bad threads?

No. 87124

>>87118
Found a triggered pitnutter in the wild.(dragging an infight to /meta/)

No. 87125

>>87124
Right? It’s not comparable at all. These dogs could maim or kill a person or another pet. It’s a good thing when they get put down. It’s a net positive for society. Wanting to shoot a stray cat just because it was abandoned on the street is pure sadism. Maybe more pitbulls should be put down so we have more room for the stray cats who would never hurt anyone or any other animal unless they were trying to defend or feed themselves.

No. 87126

>>87125
I love cats. I own cats. But this is not true, cats do hunt for sport. They severely damage the ecosystem and many species populations when let outside. It should be a requirement that all cats are kept indoors with any found outside removed from the owner's possession and taken to a shelter.
I wish cat owners didn't have a blind spot about outdoor cats. It would be much more humane to cull feral cat populations than to let these colonies be infected, mauled, and eaten to death. These are slow, painful, and sorrowful deaths.
That said, I still don't have a problem with the cat hate thread. There are posters who hate dogs for "humanitarian" reasons and also out of spite. The same can be said for posters who hate cats.

No. 87127

>>87098
Can you guys learn what zoosadist actually are

No. 87130

>>87125
Dogs that pose risk to humans have no right to exist. It's infuriating that you can commit manslaughter by dog and not even land in prison.(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87132

>>87130
This. Cats aren't bred to be killers. Dogs are. Cats hunt, all animals have hunting instincts. Saying cats can kill is not the same ballpark of dogs killing(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87133

can someone explain why this cat va dog discussion is still continuing? i think you guys need to get over your phobias or something

No. 87134

>>87133
Jannies encourage it by redtexting.

No. 87135

bait in the unpopular opinion thread

No. 87136

Baiting retards back in the unpopular opinions thread schizoposting about different anons being one samefagging anon please just autosage the fucking thread it's worse than the dumbass shit thread atp.

No. 87137

They're making fun of rape victims in the Funny Caps now. You guys are so shit at moderating.

No. 87138

why is the fag in unpopular opinions still not banned yet?

No. 87141

>>87120
>they have locking jaws
This is a myth. They just have strong jaws, there is no "locking" mechanism. The animal is already plenty dangerous without fictional superpowers.(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87142

We need containment for all the retards sperging about lesbians vs straight women and oral sex and the shit that's been happening in the unpopular opinions thread for three threads. Contain it with as much chains as AIslop on this site.

No. 87143

>>87141
it's also used by apologists to defend their dog not letting go, rather than admitting the fact that the dog is a dangerous demon.(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87144

>>87143
>>87141
Jaw-locking or not, those man-made creatures are more dangerous than 'domesticated' cougars. There should be a breeding ban worldwide.(this doesn't belong in /meta/)

No. 87145

>>87118
i used to post in the dog hate thread to discuss about shit like bad owners and offleash dogs and ngl i stopped bc of the pitbull facebook schizo, you can clock her repetitive posts from a mile away
she's so annoying, just the same "zomg look at this ugly beast i hope it dies" shit over and over. we get it.

No. 87146

The jewsperg in the Amerifag thread won't shut up about 'muh evil jooz' and keeps derailing everything. I guess they must be using a VPN to ban evade because there's no way they haven't been put out to pasture yet.

No. 87147

>>87146
They’ve sperging about Jews literally all day

No. 87148

>>87147
And worst is when people encourage them by responding like. Just report and ignore (unless fact checking), don't feed it. They come here thinking their retarded rants are going to convince anyone, when they should just stay on 4chud where they belong.

No. 87149

>>87119
this is so retardcoded

No. 87150

>>87145
Why should I care what offends you? Not every thread is going to cater to you 100% of the time. Grow up.

No. 87151

>>87145
Cry harder ya weak bitch.(infight bait)

No. 87152

File: 1733581964646.png (7.82 KB, 1376x70, cbsbcxzxc.png)

So why is anti semitism a big no but blanket racist and classist statements like these are suddenly allowed?
>>87146
>>87147
>>87148
>anyone who criticizes my pedo religion instead of coddling me like my entire life has been is from 4chan!
You people are the biggest hypocrites ever. Judaism is entangled with US politics and it's not derailing in the slightest. It's funny kikes have no issue with racist remarks, but the second someone doesn't put you on a pedestal for once and treat you like the #1 victim suddenly it's the end of the world. And of course, in typical Jew fashion, instead of actually engaging in critical conversation with me, you're just gonna report and cry about "MUH EBIL GOYSSSSSSSS".(ban evasion)

No. 87153

>>87152
Samefag, the context was that I was complaining how my city would rather help rich jews overseas than our majorly POC population where a good portion of them are impoverished bt sending 16 million in bonds to Shitrael that'll never get paid back. This would not have happened if not for Jewish meddling. Truth hurts though I guess.

No. 87154

Why does this annoying jew schizo get to have half their off topic posts left up in the US thread? Might as well ask now since they're shitting up this thread right now, too.

No. 87155

>>87154
You can call me a schizo all you want, but notice how it's never "incorrect". There's something really ironic about being pro censorship on an imageboard.

No. 87156

>>87155
It's not censorship, it's removing low quality and irrelevant posts. If you have a problem with that go back to kiwifarms and /pol/ to let your sperg flag fly.

No. 87157

>>87156
Are you Jewish? Very easy to answer question.
By your logic a good portion of posts would be removed for being low quality and irrelevant, or is it only "low quality and irrelevant" because it criticizes your group? Why is ableism okay but anti semitism is the worst thing possible? I don't give a shit about ableist words on an imageboard, but you should try to keep your principles consistent.

No. 87158

>>87157
I'm not jewish but you continue to obsess over that.
>Why is ableism okay
>try to keep your principles consistent
>By your logic a good portion of posts would be removed for being low quality and irrelevant
What the hell are you even talking about?

No. 87159

>>87158
Okay, if you're not Jewish, why do you staunchly defend 0.2% of the population like their lives defends on it, despite them being very privileged groups of people? Sperg is an ableist slur. So if you're fine with saying words like sperg that are used to dehumanize disabled people, then you should be fine with me saying kike.(/pol/ sperging)

No. 87160

>>87159
I am amazed how much whiteknighting there is on this site when it comes to Jews. You hardly ever see this reaction when it comes to shitting on muslims, blacks, Asians, and moids of any other race/religion. I think it's because they have this perception that shitting on Jews = Nazis which in that case the psyopped worked wonderfully on them.(/pol/ sperging)

No. 87161

>>87160
I think it has more to do with people who dislike jews making it their only talking point and trying to associate their hatred with every topic that is discussed here, like you've been doing in the US thread.

No. 87162

just stop replying to the poltard ffs

No. 87163

>>87161
I'm not >>87160. You realize I talk about other things besides Jews right? It's an anonymous imageboard, it just seems that way in isolation. Whenever someone talks about a certain group of moids they don't get accused of this.
>>87162
Lol once again, classic Jew deflection. "Nazi!" "Poltard!" "Antisemite!" "Just report and ignore because I can't accept criticism and need to cower in fear even on an anonymous imageboard!". You realize a lot of my points were about how Jews have fucked over POC, specifically black Americans right? I don't think a /pol/tard would ever come in defense of a minority group.(/pol/sperging )

No. 87164

>>87163
>I don't think a /pol/tard would ever come in defense of a minority group.
You're not fooling anyone

No. 87166

A scrote is shitting the Ugly Man Psyop thread in ot.

No. 87167

Fujos are derailing the genshin thread with their yurisperging on /m/, please nip it in the bud before this goes on for several hours

No. 87171

>>87170
just go back

No. 87172

Mods, I'd like to know, is talking about sexual trauma a banned topic now?

No. 87174

>>87172
And samefag I'm asking because I was posting in the vent thread around the same time you started deleting the posts by the anon who couldn't tell that exposure therapy didn't verbatim mean exposing herself KEK(posting about yourself in third person)

No. 87176

>>87174
>Can physically see my different post history
>Still accuses me of being the other anon
What the fuck is going on with the farmhands today? I asked a legitimate, easily answerable question. It seems like your only answer is a redtext because you know there's no rules against venting.

No. 87177

>>87176
>>87174
>>87172
There must be new jannie’s who are banhappy today, I guess. If it was hellweek I’d understand banning a nonny who makes herself sound dumb and isn’t familiar with types of therapy most burgers aren’t but whatever , but the rules don’t have any about venting about extremely graphic stuff. It’s probably just recommended to spoiler it.

No. 87178

>>87171
>repeatedly states i don't use /pol/
>y-you dare criticize the precious jews! you are a nazi /pol/ incel moid!
I swear, you retards logic is so circular that a toddler with down syndrome has more critical thought than you.(/pol/sperging/infighting)

No. 87180

If you guys have a VPN block feature can you please just keep it on for at least this thread? Like really why is the complaints and suggestions thread just a big steaming pile of shit? Do your jobs

No. 87182

>>87180
well technically this isn't their job, if it was lolcow would probably be paywalled

No. 87183

>>87150
i know the thread isn't obligated to cater to me which is why i said i quit posting in it, genius.
im still entitled to say the pitbull facebook retard is a nuisance with her constant sperging. this is the complaints thread, you know.

No. 87185

>>87180
I really would not mind if cerbmin brought back vpn bans for this thread and the amerifag thread like we had during the election. They cannot fathom that no1currs about their autistic obsession with da joos

No. 87186

>>87185
I know that you're a neoliberal who can't think critically to save your life but it's not about jews anymore, it's about censorship and falseful redtexts that label any criticism of judaism as polsperging.

No. 87187

>>87186
Schizophrenia

No. 87188

This tantrum is very likely proving that the VPN would keep the jew sperg out. It's been HOURS and they're still going.

No. 87189

>>87188
Sperg is when you dare have opinions that don't follow the LC status quo. Call me a sperg all you want, but you know I'm right. Hope Shitrael gets nuked off the map.

No. 87190

>>87189
I suggested creating an “Israel/Zionism critical” thread about two years ago but I didn’t end up doing it because I figured it would get bombarded with pointless poltard jew hate rather than valid criticism of Israel/Zionism. I think we really do need it as a containment thread so those of us capable of nuanced thinking have a place to discuss that psychotic ideology and its influence on other axes of power (eg the egregious amount of influence the “Christian Zionist” evangelicals have on US politics)



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]