[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password
(For post deletion)

The site has moved to the new server! If you notice any issues, report them here

File: 1737210040948.jpeg (373.44 KB, 955x706, IMG_2532.jpeg)

No. 2351915

This thread is to discuss your grievances with gender ideology.

>What is gender ideology?

Foundational to transgenderism, gender ideology is the belief that one’s “internal gender” can contradict one’s biological sex.

Gender ideology operates much like a religious cult. There is no scientific evidence that supports the notion that we have an “internal gender,” and yet doctors now medicalize and sterilize children with “transgender identities” who have been groomed by the cult. Anyone who does not reaffirm these delusions is labelled as a “transphobe” in order to discredit any dissenting voices of the cult.

Previous threads:
>>>/ot/2290853
>>>/ot/2252408
>>>/ot/2191693
>>>/ot/2121106
>>>/ot/2097274
>>>/ot/2037097
>>>/ot/1991983
>>>/ot/1941872

Relevant threads:
>>>/snow/2070564 MTF/TiM general
>>>/snow/2069705 FTM/TiF general

No. 2351929

File: 1737211080364.jpg (101.56 KB, 576x1024, cia spy.jpg)

lmao

No. 2351932

File: 1737211208279.png (102.52 KB, 739x469, Screenshot_20250118-044139.png)

Can't even update my stats on my health app without being reminded trannies exist.

No. 2351934

>>2351929
Some smelly fat guy in knee high socks is really coping on that "almost" right now. Maybe he's the exception!

No. 2352239

File: 1737225660074.png (470.85 KB, 600x600, download20250100210422.png)

i'm making a picrew and the idea of adding subtle "terfy"/LGB separatist references in it is so tempting.. i don't want it to be too obvious though, it'll be funny if gendies play my picrew without recognizing any.
i'm so tired of gendie/anti-terf shit in character makers (picrel, that's probably not how the author intended me to use these items kekkkkk), if they can shoehorn their ideology in everything they make, why can't i?

reposting because i realized this post belongs in this thread

No. 2352276

File: 1737226976489.jpg (171.18 KB, 816x517, hu.jpg)

>>>/ot/2349029
They don't want to be racist. Please understand.(bait)

No. 2352283

>>2351929
A classic.

No. 2352319

File: 1737228477612.jpg (156.94 KB, 1337x360, pedo.jpg)

Another day, another pedo tranny making news.
#JustTransgirlThings
https://reduxx.info/exclusive-transgender-pedophile-given-lenient-sentence-for-sexually-abusing-his-5-year-old-daughter-after-court-considers-transphobia-in-sentence/

>A trans-identified male in Australia has been sentenced to just over 4 years in prison for the horrific sexual abuse of his own 5-year-old daughter. While the offender was given the pseudonym of “Hilary Maloney” by the court, Reduxx can exclusively reveal the pedophile as Autumn Tulip Harper. Reduxx has chosen to withhold Harper’s male birth name in order to protect the identity of the victim.

>Harper, 25, was first identified as a suspect in the production of vile child sexual abuse content after an American pedophile he had been communicating with was arrested in September of 2023. A forensic examination of the pedophile’s devices found that Harper had sent him pornographic images and videos of a young girl via Discord. After identifying Harper as the owner of the account the content had originated from, police in the United States notified Australian authorities of their findings.
>On September 15, 2023, police raided Harper’s home in Clayton South, Victoria, and seized his electronic devices. An examination of his cellphone found he had produced 77 files categorized as child abuse material between May and June of 2023. The female child in the materials was identified as Harper’s own 5-year-old daughter.
>According to court records, Harper had been in an online BDSM relationship with the American pedophile, who encouraged him to sexually abuse his daughter in exchange for words of validation.
>Harper sent the other man a range of images of his daughter, including of her naked, in the shower, and of him sexually posing with her. The court also details there were several videos of Harper kissing the child’s labia, naked buttocks, and licking her anal region. In one of these videos, Harper is heard asking the girl if she “likes it” to which the child clearly responds “no.”
>Despite being arrested for the serious crime in September of 2023, Harper was released on bail and was allowed to remain free throughout the duration of the trial.
>Harper had shared custody of his daughter with his ex-partner, who only learned of the abuse after police notified her. In a victim impact statement, she spoke of the profound emotional toll the abuse had taken on her daughter, and stated that the child had begun inexplicably “acting out” around the same time the abuse would have started.
>During the trial, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Rajan Darjee was called upon to interview Harper and create a profile of his offending. Disturbingly, Darjee framed Harper as though he were a “female” who had been “pressured” by a male into committing the offenses.
>“… This pattern of sexual abuse is one which a more dominant male pressurises, manipulates and/or coerces a female who has access to a child, usually her own, to sexually abuse that child and/or to make that child available to him to sexually abuse,” Darjee wrote in his report to the court, characterizing Harper as though he were a “mother” experiencing dire circumstances.
>Referring to Harper using feminine pronouns, Darjee wrote: “She felt the man she connected with cared for and was nice to her, and due to her low self-esteem, lack of assertiveness, loneliness, submissiveness and desperation to be noticed and cared for, it was easy for him to pick up on her vulnerability and manipulate her into the master/slave relationship where he took control of her life. He then involved her in sexual exchanges and then coerced her to sexually abuse her daughter and take videos and photos to share with him. She was not inherently motivated by deviant sexual interests or any other motive, except doing what he told her and keeping him happy, to sexually abuse her daughter.”
>Darjee told the court that Harper would not need any “specific interventions to prevent further sexual offending” and dismissed the need for sex offender treatment. He also denied that Harper had a paraphilic disorder, and argued that Harper had no sexual attraction to children.
>Darjee further described Harper as “hormonally female” at the time of his offending.
>Reduxx has also been made aware through a source close to the case that Harper had initially been charged under his birth name, suggesting that he only changed his legal identification during the course of the proceedings. Due to his criminal circumstances, he likely would have had to apply for explicit permission to pursue the change from the Secretary of the Justice Department.
>Delivering the sentence on August 26, 2024, Judge Nola Karapanagiotidis highlighted Harper’s “gender dysphoria” and experiences with “transphobia” as mitigating factors, and appeared to accept the defense’s argument that he only committed the abuse to be “validated … as a woman and a sexual person.”
>He will be eligible for parole just 2 years and 6 months into his sentence.

No. 2352325

>>2352303
wait, anon, are you defending the tranny shit in media? please tell me i'm just having a reading comprehension failure here

No. 2352336

File: 1737229059525.gif (113.82 KB, 220x220, spongebob math.gif)

>>2352303
what

No. 2352341

>>2352325
nta, we've been having gendies trying to infight here lately. don't engage, just report them when you see them

No. 2352345

>>2352341
ah no wonder considering "that" thread is bumped again.

No. 2352357

>>2352355
you are so close to peaking! almost there, strain your brain a little and you will get it

No. 2352359

>>2352355
If you want to opt out of womanhood, then you also opt out of the empathy i reserve for women. Isn't that what you wanted after all, for the world to not see you as a woman anymore? Why are you mad when we give you what you asked for?

No. 2352362

>>2352355
paying surgeons to cut off your breasts and attach a skin rotdog to your crotch won't bring you closer to your "true self" or save you from getting raped retard

No. 2352365

>>2352355
No one gets to choose their body. What you are choosing to do is opt into unnecessary surgery and potentially causing yourself lifelong chronic pain. That is not anybody's true self. I hope you feel better soon.

No. 2352369

>>2352355
Sorry, I love fellow women too much to support them when they are being mentally ill enough to cut off their functional body parts to conform to their unrealistic expectations of an imaginary ideal self. Caring for others doesn't mean blind support for their every action, especially if it's self-harming behavior.

No. 2352387

Bait has been getting more and more retarded lately. Did lolcow get namedropped on tiktok or something?

No. 2352398

>>2352387
>Bait has been getting more and more retarded lately
Just like the each new generation.

No. 2352403

>>2352387
theres been influx of tikturders coming here to be part of "girl 4chan" who come with their handmaideness intact try to report and ignore them aswell as the spoonfeeders, things were way better during hellmass

No. 2352413

File: 1737231645022.png (195.18 KB, 526x526, minors.png)

>>2352403
>things were way better during hellmass
Spotted a handmaiden. Not being able to get the freshest MtF/FtM milk from /snow/ is the opposite of 'things being better'.
Leave.(unintegrated)

No. 2352418

>>2352412
>middle east
KEKAROO HOW DO MANAGE TO DRINK THE KOOLAID WHEN YOU LIVE IN ONE OF THE MOST MISOGYNISTIC PLACES ON EARTH WHAT.

No. 2352421

File: 1737231795337.jpg (280.8 KB, 665x499, the state of things.jpg)

>>2352418
It's a troll. Ignore it.

No. 2352425

>>2352319
>"She was not inherently motivated by deviant sexual interests or any other motive"
>Australia
…Of course. If Australia wasn't such a degenerate hellhole for women he would be unemployed for lying to this extent. Imagine looking a judge in the eye and saying a male fetishist assisting another pedophile is just like a battered woman with no boundaries. The latter is amoral but doesn't present a danger to children on her own, the former is an actual menace to society

No. 2352429

>>2352421
>>2352413
What is with the shitty memes

No. 2352430

>>2352423
>Muh dysphoria
Yep, I'm sure what you felt was a magical male soul just bursting to get out and totally not just trauma from growing up in a woman-hating part of the world.

No. 2352431

>>2352421
Do you think magats are welcome here?

No. 2352432

>>2352429
It's some weird newfag, likely from pol

No. 2352435

>>2352421
>>2352413
did you find these on reddit

No. 2352437

File: 1737232205297.png (486.4 KB, 750x423, nb.png)

>>2352239
>i'm so tired of gendie/anti-terf shit in character makers (picrel, that's probably not how the author intended me to use these items kekkkkk), if they can shoehorn their ideology in everything they make, why can't i?
I've been making stories in my head since forever and recently I've started to include anti-trans/genderspecial-trolling elements into them.

You should go all out, since I couldn't (I can't write for shit).

No. 2352441

File: 1737232402826.png (1.01 MB, 640x766, into the bin.png)

>>2352429
To get you triggered, so you GTFO faster. It ain't your safe space, kid.(bait)

No. 2352443

>>2352441
Did you find this site yesterday? Are you underage?

No. 2352444

File: 1737232463679.jpeg (83.61 KB, 619x665, plebbit.jpeg)

>>2352435
Plebbit bans such things, silly.

No. 2352450

File: 1737232561270.jpg (45.67 KB, 600x817, Katana.jpg)

>>2352441
>It ain't your safe space, kid.
While you were changing your pronouns, I studied the blade.

No. 2352455

File: 1737232624330.jpg (41.1 KB, 489x506, mis.jpg)

>>2352425
What is it with Anglos and their caping for pedos?

No. 2352778

File: 1737245354823.jpeg (43.46 KB, 720x609, image0.jpeg)

TiFs coming to lolcow and integrating poorly instead of going to 4chan is an accidental self own and peak material. Why are you coming to the woman site? That’s not very masc non binary of you, bro dude king.

The way TiFs renounce femaleness but still expect and feel entitled to female solidarity was what made me stop seeing them as innocent wallflowers, they’re obviously not degenerate rapebeasts like your average TiM and they tend to have turbulent backgrounds but they’re certainly no less retarded kek

No. 2352797

>>2352276
why are BM like this?(bait)

No. 2352821

File: 1737248532220.png (299.67 KB, 591x1058, IMG_0141.png)

>troon infighting over dr. girlfriend

No. 2352822

>>2351929
kek saved

No. 2352909

>>2352821
Kek what a bunch of fake fans. Not only do they not know that Dr. Girlfriend is now Dr. Mrs. The Monarch, but she’s a natal female. Why don’t you go claim Hunter Gathers and his big beautiful breasts?

No. 2352920

>>2352909
Samefag but also the tif has more in common with her because both of them have deeper voices because of ruining them.

No. 2352963

>>2352909
These people didn't even watch the show, if they did, they would know it's a running joke that she's female despite having a manly voice. I'm pretty sure she even says more than once that she got it from smoking.

No. 2353452

>>2352239
Do it nona! You can make it subtle enough that you could play dumb if needed. For example the detrans symbol is a salamander, it's easy to just add one and pretend you happened to think they're cute animals.

No. 2353490

>>2352963
You're right. She was smoking 3 packs/day. She had a feminine (but still smoke-ravaged) voice in a flashback.
Why ahey are they always identifying with fictional characters that they know nothing about? It often makes them look worse (read: honest) than they're intending to present themselves as.

No. 2353525

>>2353522
"Cocksucking pigs" kek, i think you're lost if you think this insult is going to work here. The whole website is about hating cockworshipers of your kind.

No. 2353540

>>2353536
Fantasizing and accusing women of "wanting to be raped", well goodness all of that testosterone induced rage could almost make you pass for a man!

No. 2353548

>>2353525
it’s funny and very telling they always think just because we identify as women and are critical of troons that we’re submissive cockslaves who are all hyper feminine.
no sweeties, you’re the ones who were made so uncomfortable in your own body by men that you chopped your tits off and post about your boypussy and ‘corrective rape’ on twitter.

No. 2353583

nonas, i have a question that has been on my mind for a while now, i just remembered it while reading through the tif thread.

do you think most or all tifs are straight? or, more accurately, are most tifs in the west straight? for context, im an eastern euro and this has never been my experience. every tif here i knew trooned out due to a combination of trauma (often sexual), strict gender roles and homophobia. tbf, i've never met a fully homosexual tif but every single one of them primarily or exclusively dates other women/tifs.

i do get why people think "gay trans men" are straight, but again, in my experience every one of them rarely or never dates actual men. are primarily osa tifs more common in america, canada or western europe? it would make sense since it seems that there's a lot more celebration of individualism and more of a need to feel special and stand out from the crowd, meanwhile here not conforming to certain standards means getting hounded for the rest of your life. it also checks out that all tifs here spend lots of time in english speaking groups online, use english slang irl and adopt english names.

and also, it baffles me when some anons here can't believe young girls are shamed and berated for things such as having short hair, not wearing makeup or being not feminine enough in tiny ways. i have no idea what kind of utopia you all are living in where even the most conservative people are okay with that. but also, from my experience eastern euros are pretty neurotic about gender roles, even more liberal ones kek.

can anyone explain to me what's up with all this? every time i hear about hetero women trooning out, having kids after trooning or trooning after having them, tifs getting with actual males or completely normal feminine women trooning i just end up confused. i really can't wrap my head around this shit, is the culture in the west really this different? and i'm not even in the most conservative ee country. sorry for being retarded about this kek.

No. 2353595

>>2353592
nta but you're being really shitty to her for no reason.

No. 2353596

>>2353595
don't reply to bait nonna, just let her run her laps until she gets banned

No. 2353606

>>2353602
No one transitions because they want to be special? Have you never met a genderspecial in your life?

No. 2353616

>>2353614
>us
Oh my god a live one. Well considering you're here on terfchan to brag about being not like other gendies I would say it's all of you. Back to tumblr, Sock.

No. 2353619

>>2353616
where the flying fuck are these faggots coming from? did LC get namedropped on the clock app before it got banned?

No. 2353624

File: 1737288339350.png (94.14 KB, 680x674, 913.png)


No. 2353625

>>2353583
From what I've seen there's kind of an even divide between straight and non-straight ones in the west. There's plenty who are married to men, have had children with men (while calling themselves "seahorse dads"), and some report suddenly feeling a strong attraction to men after taking testosterone even though they used to be into women. But there's also some like the situation you mentioned. I agree it's probably a need to feel extra special for the straight ones, since tumblr type of communities consider straightness and other common traits boring.

No. 2353627

>>2353626
why are you using wojacks? if you’re gonna use them use the tif one at least.

No. 2353628

>>2353619
Lmao the five year old woah jacks they're not even up to date on the current raid meta

No. 2353629

tifs give me second-hand embarrassment. they really are the 2020s nlogs.

No. 2353640

>>2353634
no don’t tell her that wtf! it’s better that she doesn’t know.
you’ve opened the floodgates anon, whatever happens is on you.

No. 2353641

>>2353640
sorry I just find it hilarious that troons just can't help but out themselves, even when they're anonymous. bpd whores run circles around these girls.

No. 2353644

>>2353641
>so you admit it? you are a woman?
will never not be applicable kek

No. 2353645

>>2353636
I don't have a nigel, but it's better than having a "nigel" with a fake dick that fights the natural law of gravity when it hangs on a stitch between the thighs. Take your rotten beef with Isaac Newton, you will never be a man.

No. 2353647

>>2353646
>being a tranny with a suicide attempt rate of 41%
Fixed that for you.

No. 2353649

>>2353640
What did the ayrt say?

No. 2353651

>>2353649
to kill yourself i think

No. 2353653

>>2353625
thank you for the actual response nona! and yeah, what you said makes sense. what i'm most interested in about them is just… why? i really don't understand why a woman who fits into the roles society has assigned would decide to troon out. that's mostly why i mentioned the east v. west/collective v. individual divide. here these women have 0 reason to want to stand out as different, since conforming is the socially better route to take. but from what i get about more progressive countries/areas in the west is that standing out isn't seen as negatively as it is here, and is possibly even encouraged, meanwhile fitting in is seen as boring and backwards, which would lead these "normal" women to troon. i might be wrong, but i'm missing a lot of the info of day to day life and culture in these countries.

i feel like i'm sperging about this but i'm just fascinated by psychology and cultural differences and i feel like the topic of how trans ideology changes based on region would be an important thing to address in the gc movement since it sometimes feels too focused on a very specific few countries while leaving the rest behind. and it's important to understand why these people troon out and how to fix the social issues that lead them to do it, i know it saved me from fully transitioning myself.

>>2353634

don't forget cp!

No. 2353656

>>2353646
Posting this image whilst being a tranny is bold kek

No. 2353659

>>2353655
Trannies wish terfs wanted to rape them kek

No. 2353662

File: 1737289744515.jpeg (91.64 KB, 640x429, 0D275456-ED84-4715-B07A-4D8582…)

Stop replying to the stank pussy pooner retards and go back to posting gender cringe

No. 2353666

>>2353664
We know you’re a woman because a man would’ve posted child porn

No. 2353670

>>2353664
Moids don't make passive aggressive threats like this btw, they just spam cp

No. 2353672

i'd kill to know who namedropped lc and where…

No. 2353673

>>2353583
The TIFs I know are lesbian or bisexual women, who hate their sexuality for one reason or another. There are definitely straight TIFs though.

No. 2353679

>>2352821
If she isn't confirmed to have been born with a dick, she can't be "claimed" by male troons. But none of these retards (FtMs included) actually care about canon.

No. 2353681

>>2353653
Ntayrt, but I live in a very trooned out place.
I’ve known a lot of young women who’ve fallen for the gendershits through the years. Blog, but one of my best friends when I was younger was supposedly a gay twinky kid, but it came out that she was actually always a girl and she detransitioned. She’s very hot now in all honesty, and is a personal trainer type of girl so she’s got a great ass kek.
Since I knew her when she was very young, looking back, the signs were there, but we were young enough that no one batted an eye at her being a twink, because she talked like a gay best friend and even dated actual gay boys which is funny but also kinda weird to me.
I remember the gay ones she dated theorising but it wasn’t crazy to think she was just a boy.

For a lot of them it’s a combination of the fact that it’s kind of encouraged in a lot of circles to be different, but also sexual trauma and uncomfortability in being a woman. In writing about my friend it made me come to a realisation actually, there was a LGBTQIAGBJAEU youth organisation here that threw like actual parties for kids?? not wholesome shit, actual parties.
That was very popular when we were that age, she was active in it. The friend group that it fostered was a community ranging from 13-18, and the older ones actively encouraged the younger ones to troon, pretty vile shit. A lot of the tims from that group were called out for being pedos and rapists.

No. 2353684

>>2353653
I think part of the reason is that they've grown so sick of all the misogyny and negative connotations of feminine gender roles that they decide to troon out just so they can pretend to be a non-conforming "man", or to be free to perform these roles they're attached to but without the negative connotation of being called a woman/girl. They probably don't want the reason they're girly to be the fact that they were born with a vagina they don't want to be a walking stereotype, so to speak. Idk how much this actually applies tho.

No. 2353830

File: 1737300184140.jpeg (5.75 KB, 225x225, images (17).jpeg)

I'm in a fairly big online group for a niche music genre that is not known for attracting trannies but for some reason the admin has recently
>Began posting trans rights memes multiple times a day
>Kicked anyone who asked what those posts have to do with the music genre
>He makes constant ethel cain posts despite his music not ever being relevant to the genre
>Posts memes multiple times a week about banning "transphobes"
>Invites tranny musician that was on MtF thread once who does not make music relevant to the group
>Admin eggs tranny on and encourages him to post selfies and more retarded tranny memes
>Troon shamelessly ebegs in the group for his other tranny bandmate/romantic partner to get surgery
>Group goes from being a place to find small band tour dates, recommendations, and memes about a specific niche music genre to tranny meme central
>An incredibly talented artist in the scene who is actually female and fairly well known was invited to the group
>She makes a song slightly differing from usual style
>People start harassing her so badly she has to leave
>Admin is still posting all day worshipping mediocre tranny musicians who aren't even in the scene
I'm so tired

No. 2353831

>>2353825
That is so fucking depressing I'm sorry nonna.

No. 2353838

>>2353831
what was the og post saying?

No. 2353843

>>2353831
nta but id assume its >>2353830

No. 2353880

>>2353830
That sucks. Maybe you can lie low and try to get in contact with people who get kicked to start your own little micro side group?

No. 2353888

>>2353830
I agree with other anon, secretly start a side group for the people who get kicked out

No. 2353893

File: 1737303751997.jpg (30.79 KB, 540x540, 4335354354.jpg)

>>2352319
>Eligible for parole in 2 years and 6 months
Are you completely fucking shitting with me right now?
What is with the law not locking up pedos for life? I don't care what the fucking reason is. Hell, I don't even care if this child abusing psycho was a real woman. That kind of crime warrants a life sentence.

No. 2354228

File: 1737315469728.webp (Spoiler Image,9.31 KB, 256x256, terfyshibAI.webp)

Anyone got some terf/gc wins to post?

I'll start, 2 years ago I had one single terf friend and that was it. Now I have 1 more gc friend in person, my original friend has added 2 more terfy friends who I know online, my mom is peaked, my sister is peaked, my (male) boss is peaked and he peaked my other male coworker.
I went from feeling surrounded by woke people and having no one to talk to, to now being able to be openly gender critical and talk shit about troons with friends, family and at work! Spoiler for ai slop, tried to make a terf shiba artwork kek

No. 2354239

>>2354228
I like to think that the abortion ban peaked and will continue to peak more and more women. I think tranny enabling is going to fall out of vouge the longer this decade progresses

No. 2354255

File: 1737316296712.jpg (41.8 KB, 600x729, 1000031617.jpg)

>>2354253

No. 2354259

smells like rothole in here.. ignore and report

No. 2354260

Nonnas don’t reply to the TIF retard and simply report. She’s the same that has been sperging here for three days.

No. 2354264

>>2354239
I hope many women realize that trannies don’t care about female rights because recognizing sex based oppression is transphobia to them, you can’t even draw a pussy without triggering them.

No. 2354267

>>2354228
Congrats on having a solid friend group nonna. Enjoy!

No. 2354276

>>2354264
Like try talking to a TIM about it and they’ll have a full breakdown. And if you are allowed to talk you must hereby swear first that trans rights are first and foremost important and bla bla.
Look at how they react when you speak about FGM and also how TIFs are treated kek.

No. 2354277

>>2354228
yes nona i feel like i’m really good at peaking people honestly! i live in a place with a lot of troons, so those people are already technically aware though. most women with a thinking brain on their heads will eventually open up to challenging what they’ve been told.
i guess i’m just disarming enough and careful with my language to not trigger anything, there are certainly ways you can go about explaining your thoughts to people who know but don’t want to admit it that usually work.
sometimes it takes a little while but when you reach it with a friend it feels like a definite win!
i’m not talking to any friends irl at the moment but i think i’ve successfully ‘peaked’ at least 2 women over time, plenty of scrotes but i don’t really care about them

No. 2354282

File: 1737316804097.jpeg (17.37 KB, 250x395, 1722378918355.jpeg)

>the troon calling others a fake victim
damn the horsepiss really kills their brain doesn't it

No. 2354285

File: 1737316854636.jpg (19.97 KB, 360x360, fslur.jpg)

>>2354270
>>2354274
dilate(report and ignore)

No. 2354292

>>2354264
Lovin the trans genocide your post caused nona. Keep fighting the good fight

No. 2354298

How funny is it that our resident baiter posted softcore yuri, as if we'd cry and puke after seeing anime girls kiss. Retarded TRAs and liberals need to act as if they're up against ISIS tier fundamentalists because otherwise they have no reason to throw tantrums.
>>2354228
All my female friends and acquaintances are peaked, except two (upper) middle-class munchie TRAs, but even those women have peaking moments before beating themselves back into the acceptable opinion. I know way less TRAs than i did before, they seem less brazen or they're idiots who are perpetually late and out of touch when it comes to trends. It feels great to be the first person they can comfortably voice their opinions to

No. 2354300

Again nonnitas, keep reporting and don’t reply to that retard. They’re not here to discuss or anything.

No. 2354302

>>2354264
But they can plaster their disgusting dicks everywhere and make them the first priority, even in lesbian spaces. Fuck off with your mouthfeel, your atrophied limp dick is the same as a regular scrote.

No. 2354303

>>2354277
The more you’re in contact with trannies the more you peak. Operation “let transwomen speak” always works kek, works with TIFs too, but not as well in my opinion.

No. 2354305

>>2354282
>horsepiss
Is that like some back alley estrogen or some shit? I heard trannies will boil plastic bags and drink that in an attempt to wear our skin for their creepy fetish.

No. 2354306

>>2354277
can you give some tips and tricks?

No. 2354312

>>2354306
Don’t go full on terf mode, but use mode mild , basic facts. The average person doesn’t think that scrotes can be women or viceversa. I personally like bringing up sexuality and how we must both respect those who are uniquely attracted to sex while respecting identity too, because both “deserve to exist” kek.
Once I see how they react I can get more into it and bring up prison, sports, shelters and how women must also be protected.

No. 2354324

>>2354228
I’ve successfully peaked two (level headed, good friends) people that tried to “fix me” when I started being more outspoken and losing people over it kek. They stayed to debate me, try and “de-radicalize me” and couldn’t win. One identified as non binary at the time, ended up desisting, and our friendship has grown so much tighter as a result! Recently also got to a male who was groomed by an adult TiM as a teenager and used to coddle the pedo a lot when recounting his sexual abuse, which pissed me off (say what you will about scrotes, I think he didn’t deserve being groomed and then having to coddle the feefees of his predator)

People can be too smart to be gendies or gender allies, anyone with decent pattern recognition can be snapped out of it if you just give them a place where they can think without snuffing any questioning out with thought terminating cliches, but you have to pick your battles carefully- my bestie was not like your average enby tif, she’s same sex attracted, was very gnc and level headed, found inconsistencies within the community dumb even while trans-identified, and didn’t try to deny her sex, so it was just accelerating what was already there, and the other two were males who were goaded into “cracking their egg” while young, so they had experience with being creeped out by TiMs. I’m not going to try to change the mind of a genderpunk xe/fae or an incel to trans rapehon. Those just have to crash and burn by themselves.

Most neutral people are swayed in your favour when they see how the average TRA reacts to any confrontation, too. You’re not gonna change the rapehon’s mind but the people around you two are going to notice that he immediately jumps to sexual and violent comments and it’ll plant little seeds of questioning that they can look back upon in the future. Operation let them speak is incredibly effective, it even works in males kek

No. 2354331

>>2354312
The easiest way to peak people is to have them 'listen to Trans voices' kek. Anyone who spends any amount of time with a troon will come out of the experience peaked as fuck.

No. 2354341

>>2353583
Yes, most tifs are straight women who convinced themselves that being straight is bad and boring, some with slight bisexual tendencies (I think lesbian tifs are a minority) many tifs date other tifs to fulfill their "gay man" fantasy, "super queer couple" or because they don't know how to live with men.
Now the reasons you mention for transitioning don't apply to all tifs and vary depending on their upbringing and country of origin and also that all tifs seem to have untreated emotional problems.

No. 2354362

>>2354303
ayrt and for fucking real kek. it never stops being infuriating how wilfully ignorant so many people are though.

>>2354312
i hate to say it but also troon pickmes like blaire white can help for retards as well. he uses xitter speech so it’s easily digestible for them

No. 2354370

>>2354362
Blaire doesn't peak anyone. He just preaches to the conservative choir. The group that wants us to be private property without access to reproductive healthcare also hates trannies.
Peaking leftists is more important imo since they are more subconsciously aware that women are oppressed than conservitards.

No. 2354371

>>2354341
>I think lesbian tifs are a minority
idk i can see a lesbian trooning out for internalized homophobia

No. 2354375

>>2354370
ayrt and i’ve actually had it work with very non conservative women (obviously men as well but thats a given) by basically saying, ‘oh, be warned ‘she’s’ a little controversial, but she’s just so funny!’ and when he says super retarded takes i’ll call it out and have a discussion with them about it. again, it needs to be easily digestible and there isn’t much in the way of a spokesperson like that for us yet, at least not that i’m aware of.

No. 2354376

>>2354371
I think lesbian TIFs are more common outside of the West.

No. 2354379

>>2354371
Butch lesbian who are on T are rising, those are one of the victims of the “transgenocide”. I met 3 butch women and 2 trooned out.
We need to save butch lesbians.

No. 2354518

>>2354370
Plenty of liberals still watch Blaire, he has a lot of retarded takes but he's a decent entry point if you want to get a normie who is mildly sympathetic to trannies to start being exposed to their degeneracy and how retarded they can get, because he covers things like trannies in sports, predators, shits on non binary people and defends JK Rowling. They'll still believe in trutrans because he does, but it's a decent peaking starter. Watching him when I was a teenager is part of why I never really bought into this bullshit and I'm not a conservative.

No. 2354534

>>2354228
i wouldn't call my friends "terfs" or "peaked" but they have common sense and i can freely criticize/make fun of trannies and gender ideology around them. i was worried they'll turn away from me once i became open about my views, but turns out they had their doubts too which they now feel comfortable telling me about. it's great to finally be honest with myself and others and have productive discussions with people

No. 2354546

>>2354370
>Blaire doesn't peak anyone.
No he really does! I've literally peaked some very woke girls using him. They refuse to listen to "bigots" so when it's coming from a mixed poc transwoman they see themselves as "below" his opinion on the woke social scale and suddenly they're willing to listen. He's actually a fantastic entry point to starting to peak someone. Of course you need to continue the conversations and push them to think a little further, you can't JUST make them watch him but he's been such a great resource. Especially since he's really popular and has trans followers, it means even when they scroll to read comments they suddenly get faced with the fact that many more trans people agree and they're not all woke lefties.

No. 2354549

>>2354376
This is definitely true imo, esp. in places that haven't been infected by modern online troon ideology as much and which were very homophobic to begin with.

No. 2354582

>>2354379
This is heart breaking. Lesbians seem to be the biggest victims of the troon agenda because women are not allowed to be masculine in any way.

No. 2354583

>>2354376
There's plenty of them in the US actually, usually it's autistic women that become TIFs and date one another. They usually have no experience with guys aside from getting bullied by guys or being groomed by TIMs

No. 2354673

im seething so hard rn about trannies i hate every single one of them they are all mentally ill and retarded and useless. it all boils down to tearing down women even more and is a completely misogynistic concept i’m so fucking pissed this ever became a thing

No. 2354702

>>2354673
>it all boils down to tearing down women even more
The crazy thing is that feminism was really getting somewhere so men literally just… invented an entire new form of oppression out of nowhere. It's almost like they're flexing on women about how they can do whatever they want to us and we will either follow them willingly or put up with it. They can tell us that up is down and black is white and men are women, and people will go along with it no matter how nonsensical, harmful or sick it is.

So now feminists get distracted from important women's issues because they have to fight a battle on a brand new front, they have to expend all this time and energy on convincing the world of something everyone fucking knows and has always known from the beginning of human existence!! We can't ignore it because it does cause real material harm, but we never had to worry about it a few decades ago. And to add insult to injury they force team with actual minority groups and mimic the language of activists, so they're essentially using our own fight for human rights and fair treatment against us.

It's just wild. I'm in awe of how supremely evil, cruel and EFFECTIVE the entire phenomenon is, the devil works hard but truly men work harder. My only solace is that a bunch of men are cutting their dicks off and that is very funny and well deserved.

No. 2354733

>>2354702
ayrt i read your post out loud to a friend because you explained everything perfectly.
she said
>when we're extinct soon aliens will find this post and hang it in a museum
KEK
edit:
>if this is really the only form of intelligent life we're fucked

No. 2354861

File: 1737340586856.jpeg (Spoiler Image,1.05 MB, 1170x1117, IMG_5822.jpeg)

>t4t
>Minecraft

No. 2354893

>>2354702
I feel like basically moids kind of went along with women's rights until women wanted rights to be in a relationship with another women. Moids freaked out about because they knew another woman would be able to easily replace them in every single regard (aside from sperm donation) and that's when they decided to unleash the trannies and shut it down.
The sooner women collectively wake up and realize that men instinctively want to dominate us, that it's in their lizard nature and no "dysphoria" or whatever the fuck can change that, the better.

No. 2354903

>>2354702
Bet some bigwigs behind closed doors manufactured this entire social issue and demographic for 1) votes for the democrats after Obama terms when people started hating him and b) distract and divide. Educated women are a nightmare for conmen and so are educated people. Science is being argued as subjective instead of biological fact. They're changing definitions. History is going to be a minefield to navigate in the future. They're literally trying to rewrite humanities stories. They being all the aristocracy billionaire cunts.

No. 2354905

I feel like the anti trans movement was gaining momentum until squid game came out and everyone saw and sympathized with that one tranny whose biggest dream was to be a ladyboy in thailand

No. 2354932

>>2354905
Squid game is just a show nonna. It didn’t do much, given that the male actors are all rancid.

No. 2354945

>>2354905
the director and everyone else in korea obviously didn't give a single shit about that storyline but all the fucking retards ate it up as per.
oh cool, a man in a country where every man has to enlist is a man that was in the military, so brave of him! masculine rage is a beautiful thing!
it could paint them in the worst light ever but if the character is being handmaidened for or has a single redemption moment they lap that shit up like they're starving.

No. 2355004

>>2354861
Male or female that community is full of gender groomers. I've stumbled into enough youtubers to see them transition post covid, kek. I thought vid rel was produced by a woman but it was just a disappointing TiM who can't speak louder than this or else his "girl voice" will crack.

No. 2355007

>>2352909
except hunter was an accurate depiction of troons so they won’t like him kek
>military
>obvious agp
>constant five o’clock shadow
>stereotypically male in every way
>bald
>horrible giant bolt ons

No. 2355116

File: 1737356743269.jpg (86.84 KB, 630x392, horse piss.jpg)


No. 2355120

File: 1737357067416.png (419.46 KB, 1620x979, 5466656666666666.png)


No. 2355138

File: 1737359375715.jpg (129.55 KB, 705x679, Trumps new executive order.jpg)

Thoughts? Supposedly will be active since day 1 of the new administration.

No. 2355139

>>2355138
>The EO is literally called "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government"

No. 2355152

>>2352821
imagine ftms saying to mtfs "that's not yours" they'd be flayed alive. more male vs female socialization

No. 2355153

>>2355138
Big if true. The 1 good thing Trump can do kek

No. 2355190

>>2355138
Democrats have made the job so easy for him kek. I’m not a burger, but I think that Trump barely keeps a fuck about women’s rights, he is after approval. Having said that, I hope he puts action in his words, people will start being openly real after this I think.
The trannies are going to seethe about “transgenocide” though kek. The truth is that they bit more than they could chew, if they had just sticked to “I know I am x, but to deal with my mental illness I have to live as y” instead of forcing people to bend reality and safety measures for scrotes (because let’s outright say it, it’s a MRA movement , where men can cry oppression and play victim) the more neutral people wouldn’t have converted into transphobia aka sanity. I’ll respect your retarded pronouns , but I won’t take retarded brainwashing as being an “ally”..

No. 2355226

File: 1737367262873.jpg (28.88 KB, 682x450, dfb5a8b9-47e0-428d-889b-e663f1…)

I know Emilia Perez is a very bad movie but I just love how much it is making trannies seethe only because it's an accurate representation of hons (and they cry about it because muh bad representation):
>Bad gangster guy wants to transition to start a brand new life. Very suspicious how he wants to change his entire identity as a criminal.
>Abandons his kids for a while to live a new life.
>He transitions, he's now a good person and a beacon of peace. Nobody ever questions him on his past mistakes, which include several criminal offenses.
>He's now a woman, so of course he's a good guy now! Don't you see that transitioning makes you a brand new different person, therefore all the bad stuff you did before is erased?
>Only now that he's "female" he feels remorse about kidnapping and disappearing people out of this world, has a "change of heart" and makes up a charity financed by his gangster shenanigans (this is incredibly disrespectful to the real victims of crime that have spoken badly about this movie, but alas)
>Still he doesn't do it alone, he mostly sends his handmaiden lawyer minion to do his deeds
>"I'm Emilia Perez, a woman like anyone else!"
>His son clocks him and says "you smell like my dad and I hate your perfume", this is treated as a sweet moment in the movie. Troons mad because they think injecting hormones makes them smell female
>"Emilia" gets mad at his wife and starts choking her violently, making light of how he's still male and still aggressive despite transitioning
>In the end he just dies. Handmaiden lawyer now takes care of the kids
>Vaginoplasty song is actually hilarious because it just shows you how many fucking surgeries they have to go through to have a chance to "pass"
Picrel is the guy that plays Emilia, his real name is Carlos Gascon.

No. 2355235

File: 1737367635338.jpg (310.38 KB, 2400x1600, Marcus-and-Kevin-white-chicks-…)

>>2355226
he looks like this, both in the movie and real life

No. 2355236

>>2355226
Kek this is true representation.

No. 2355240

>>2355226
>In the end he just dies.
Always nice when a movie has a happy ending!

No. 2355281

>>2355246
yeah shes fat dont be mean

No. 2355346

>>2355226
lol the movie has got to be some kind of troll or something in some way, with how egregiously bad it is and self-admitting it is, but i know that this is just what wins awards nowadays anyways so im coping.

No. 2355360

File: 1737377750433.jpg (196.33 KB, 263x429, song.jpg)

I wish there was a version for TIFs.

No. 2355432

>>2355226
I saw the trailer when waiting for another movie to start in theater long ago, it looked so ridiculous I had no idea it was meant to be serious and not a comedy.

No. 2355477

>>2355138
Has anyone been seeing tranny virtue signaling about this on social media? Because I haven't, not even on tumblr or Facebook (where I am friends/mutual friends with a lot of nonbinaries and troons) (I'm crypto and live in a shitlib state). Kek, is the tranny wave really dying down? A few years ago this would have taken storm on social media but now troons don't even care. I didn't vote for Trump but I'm slightly happy about this not that happy since I know women's rights and healthcare are going to be royally fucked, but.

No. 2355512

>>2355477
i'm sure they are already working on skeets and share pics and whiney tik toks

No. 2355638

>>2355116
very cool that they only call out the women who actually need hrt for menopause and not the trannies taking it for the coom

“how dare these evil women treat their medical condition with a drug that harms animals!!!! but trannies neeeeed horse piss pills and we can’t upset them so that’s fine”

i fucking hate it here

No. 2355644

>>2354228
The worlds most annoying tranny has decided to step away from my hobby group. He is professionally active in that field and has decided to step away from all public apperances too. Since the guy is a pathological narcissicist I'm very happy. He would be annoying as a non-tranny too, but being a tranny makes him extra annoying.

No. 2355680

>>2355644
yay! every win counts!

No. 2355699

>>2355477
I haven't seen anything about this at all and I follow a lot of troon cows. Maybe they're more worried about the Tiktok ban, or they haven't heard about it because it's buried under piles of useless posts about how to survive the Trumpocalypse while existing as a danger haired person of gender.
But I've noticed a huge decline in action for trans things. All the petitions for trans rights get way less reblogs and a lot of them don't follow through, if you look at the signature to reblog ratio it's obvious that it's shared to virtue signal.

No. 2355782

There's this video of a professor schooling his students playing "who said what" or whatever with foucault and others. Does anyone have that?

No. 2355845

>>2355782
is it this video with derrick jensen?

No. 2355894

>>2355226
Troons mad because everything in the movie is true. It's not even le ebil bad terfs are ebil or "misrepresentation", this is all true, Bruce Jenner being the first offender and that happened like what, 10 years ago? Kris Tyson? Everything is true. They mad because they know that every effort and every lie they attempted to pass as true crumbled in the span of a two hourish movie. Brilliant. It did its job beautifully, terrible movie but gorgeous peaking material. No gay man got mad at stuff like Dahmer on the argument that "it made homo/bisexual men look bad", but troons are so so so mad about this, it's so funny. Yes, I know that the guy being trans is a big part of the movie if not the most important one but this proves the cultish behaviour of the movement, it's like when scientology people or muslims get mad at people online that point out the flaws of their shitty cults, same thing.

No. 2356215

>>2355477
>>2355699
>>2355512
I've seen two back to back on twitter a few hours ago, with tens of thousands of likes from other troons, they are saying the executive order is just like nazi laws against jews etc… They are looking for ways to leave the country etc… I hope they don't, we don't want them either!

No. 2356319

File: 1737407374196.jpg (20.88 KB, 404x440, 17121c80-81e6-4bda-b05f-38eada…)

>>2355226
Trannies get so angry when they see hons on screen, they all somehow have deluded themselves into thinking they all look like cutesy frail and feminine """women""" (read: femboys and fags) instead of the truth: they're all ugly hulking men with male pattern baldness wearing wigs and makeup to play pretend.

No. 2356324

File: 1737407423957.gif (3.7 MB, 520x293, a42f549a5a0f49a6a9db64c1ace108…)

>>2355894
>>2355226
Not even this movie portraying the troon as a born again angel that regrets his criminal past (and gets redeemed out of it) is good enough representation for them. It's like squid game 2. They hate everything that reminds them of the reality of being male, even if those characters are supposed to be good little saints that can't do anything wrong.

No. 2356340

File: 1737407773691.png (307.27 KB, 518x518, 1736065637587.png)

>>2356215
>they are saying the executive order is just like nazi laws against jews etc… They are looking for ways to leave the country etc
Same old shit as always
I wonder if this will make a lot of people detransition since they won't reap any benefits from it anymore, or if they'll double down in protest and become more insane about it
>>2356324
Kek I can't believe we got two very realistic portrayals of troon on female violence in 2024. I hope this peaks people

No. 2356380

File: 1737408927946.png (105.85 KB, 900x900, c5112f50-d493-4195-966f-d5a95c…)

Kinda ironic to see the trannies coming here to being laugh at while they post stuff like picrel.

No. 2356401

>>2355138
This is a good thing. I wonder how they're going to enforce the ID rule for males who have already had theirs changed.

No. 2356404

I feel like even more than elusive than than passing tranny is the tranny that doesn't act like a psycho.
I always hear "oh not all trans are like that" whenever I bring up the nasty shit troons do. Ok. Where are they? Where are the normie trans?

No. 2356414

>>2356215
>>2356340
It's just 2016 all over again, but with poorly-applied makeup and tit scars.

No. 2356423

>>2356404
>I always hear "oh not all trans are like that" whenever I bring up the nasty shit troons do. Ok. Where are they? Where are the normie trans?
This so fucking much this, where the fuck are the good trans? The normie trans? Saying "oh they're irl and not online! Not everything you see online is real!" Is such a cope because EVERYONE is online nowadays.

No. 2356424

File: 1737410117529.png (21.21 KB, 735x143, makeitrealbrian.png)

DON'T LET YOUR DREAMS BE DREAMS, BRIAN

No. 2356429

>>2356404
I don't know why I'm answering this because you won't accept it, but you probably haven't heard about them because they're just focusing on shit like doing their job and living their irl lives instead of being terminally online. It's also the crazies who screech the loudest who we hear, but I promise you there are trans people that are online a normal amount instead of making tiktok videos or fighting in comments, irl they act normal aside from being trans. After a while you even forget they are until you witness something transphobic happen or they talk about picking up their hormones etc.

No. 2356434

>>2355138
Seems too good to be true, especially coming from trump. I wanna be hopeful, though. How have I yet to see any trannies pretending they're victims of a licheral genocide, though? They were throwing way bigger mantrums over a lot less last time trump got elected. >>2355226
I saw the clip where he pushes and chokes out his ex wife and went "of course". It's kind of incredible how trannies and handmaidens' cognitive dissonance of thinking trannies can do no wrong accidentally makes for an accurate portrayal, and they're shown as the violent, entitled, misogynistic moids they truly are. OITNB did the same, they truly thought the tranny storyline was sad and compelling when in reality he: >committed credit card fraud to get fake tits
>ruined his marriage and relationship with his son
>beat up a woman in prison with his moid strength, then cried and sobbed twansphobia when a bunch of female prisoners rightfully ganged up on the man and taught him a lesson

No. 2356436

>>2356424
the first 3 he can do but he's gonna have to explain that he's trans if he tries to use the womens bathroom

No. 2356438

>>2356434
>beat up a woman in prison.
They allowed him in a womans prison…

No. 2356441

File: 1737410677918.jpg (86.13 KB, 800x640, 20250120_185806.jpg)

"What do you mean it was a way to be homophobic? Old cultures were woke! Yt people ruined it"

No. 2356450

>>2356404
>>2356423
>Ok. Where are they? Where are the normie trans?
They're gonna claim you probably didn't even notice they were trans because they passed.
>>2356429
Oh, look, here's one claiming something similar. You do know that most people ITT have encountered the " seemingly offline normie troon" you're talking about, and most anecdotes prove they end up being just as misogynistic as every other troon once they open their mouths, right? It's almost as if the entire ideology of thinking a male oppressor should get the right to identify into the sex they're oppressing is inherently bigoted and
sexist! A man who thinks sexist stereotypes makes someone a woman instead of simple biology cannot, and never is, a decent person. Especially when %99 of them discovered their "womanhood" through porn.

No. 2356465

File: 1737411335294.png (120.22 KB, 557x598, lol.png)

>>2356429
Nah this shit's fake. All of them are too mentally ill to be normies.
I only ever encountered one sane troon and that was in 2015 before the real troon contagion explosion, he was a sweet gay guy and kept to himself. Every other troon I've seen is insane with they/them pronouns whoring themselves out to the world and saying misogynistic shit like there's no tomorrow. Even if a normie trans did exist, they're like 1 in a 500 chance.
>>2356450
>They're gonna claim you probably didn't even notice they were trans because they passed.
Of course they say shit like that.

No. 2356471

File: 1737411539538.png (14.73 KB, 250x203, 1fecd030-73aa-4d16-bacb-052ba9…)

>>2356429
Oh please, there are tons of real videos about them acting like misogynist and beating women or crying if they get "misgendered". If there are trans people who "live a normal life", then I'm sorry to tell you that the loud ones are the ones who give the collective a bad name, and as long as they're protected like the real victims while being homophobics and misogynists, people are not going to be nice with them anymore and not for supporting Trump, but because they're tired of not being listened to give them a loud voice (women being called "period person", deal with Tims and a long etc).

No. 2356472

>>2356465
>because they passed
This nonna needs an eye check it she really believes that a man in a dress and using "she/her" pins is passing as a real woman.

No. 2356479

>>2356434
>Women beating up the troon
Based
>>2356471
>I'm sorry to tell you that the loud ones are the ones who give the collective a bad name, and as long as they're protected like the real victims while being homophobics and misogynists, people are not going to be nice with them anymore
This.

No. 2356525

>>2356471
Exactly, and if these "good normie troons" exist, why are absolutely none of them denouncing the vast majority of rapists and misogynists that make up the trans community? Why do they claim "it never happens" or "even if it happened, it's not a big deal and they probably only did that because someone was terfy"? If they're not like other troons, why do they all still either defend each other or minimize eachothers crimes?
>>2356479
>Damn, I told y'all he still had his man strength
kekkk. For context, this happened after he gave an innocent woman a black eye. Reminder that the real life actor, Laverne Cox, published a sob story about the poor twanswomen forced to serve their sentence in male prison's and the poor prisoner tranny in question had brutally raped and dismembered a little black girl whose age didn't even make it to double digits.

No. 2356559

>>2355845
I love you, yes thank you!!

No. 2356571

>>2356525
Last sentence and crying. Can't even read a random post without being reminded that men brutalize children

No. 2356580

>>2356525
>why are absolutely none of them denouncing the vast majority of rapists and misogynists that make up the trans community?
>why do they all still either defend each other or minimize eachothers crimes?
This is something everyone needs to remember when they think about "normie" troons.

>published a sob story about the poor twanswomen forced to serve their sentence in male prison

Could you please link it?

No. 2356586

>>2356525
> if these "good normie troons" exist, why are absolutely none of them denouncing the vast majority of rapists and misogynists that make up the trans community?
this this this this 1000 times this

No. 2356591

>>2356438
Hopefully not for much longer. I really, really fucking hope all troon prisoners are thrown back into minimum-security. No separate cells from the rest of the block.

No. 2356595

>>2356450
>They're gonna claim you probably didn't even notice they were trans because they passed.
Yes. As in they're so low effort and gender conforming that you don't realize they identify as a tranny and pass as their own assigned gender at birth.

No. 2356601

>>2356429
>they're just focusing on shit like doing their job and living their irl lives instead of being terminally online
No tranny has ever spontaneously existed in a vacuum. They have someone or something in their life that caused them to skinwalk. They were already mentally ill to begin with.

No. 2356603

>>2356580
Here it is
https://www.thepinknews.com/2014/08/28/us-laverne-cox-aplogises-for-reading-letter-by-a-trans-inmate-convicted-of-rape/
>The letter was written by Synthia China Blast. In 1993, Blast was found guilty of the rape and abuse of a 13-year-old girl named Ebony Williams.
>According to 1993 news reports, the girl was held captive in the apartment of Blast’s accomplice Carlos Franco.
>Blast repeatedly slashed and raped the girl. Franco then killed the girl by breaking her neck.
>Both Blast and Franco, who were members of the Latin Kings gang, are serving life prison sentences.
>Cox says she was unaware of Blast’s crime when she agreed to participate in the project.
>The Sylvia Rivera Law Project removed the video at Cox’s request, and Cox posted on Tumblr about the incident.
Of course the hulking moid wanted everyone on earth to pity the poor widdle imprisoned trannies, but when it comes to correcting the fact that he victimized a literal child rapist, he swept it under the rug and only acknowledged it on the most dead tranny social media he could think of so no one would notice what he did. Remember: no good trannies. The piece of shit didn't even donate to the victims family or any fund to protect women and girls from male violence. If the roles had been reversed, trannies would DEMAND the woman donate to some trans charity or some ugly man's boobjob GoFundMe like they always do.

No. 2356617

>>2356611
Jfc why did it post three times after giving me a thousand error messages
>Inb4 learn 2 delete redtext
I tried, learn2 fix your website.

No. 2356632

>>2355138
Does this mean boys won't be allowed to play on girls teams in schools now?

No. 2356704

>>2356340
omg i was going to post about that slapping scene in particular because it was so obvious what they were trying to do with that
>hes literally the same as women! so he can hit them!
not to mention that its korea and they dont respect women and this isnt even tranny shilling, its just pandering

No. 2356728

>"even if it happened, it's not a big deal and they probably only did that because someone was terfy"?
Even you notice how their "bigots" are women not dealing with their shit. They are too coward to call a man a "terf" because they know that they would be beaten out.
That's why all the "gender words" are more focused on women bodies and not men. We are called period havers, womb havers, etc, but men aren't called penis haver or prostate haver (then again, TIFS don't even do shit about prostate or testicular cancer like they do with breast cancer (on women) or uterus cancer).

No. 2356761

>>2356728
This 100%.

No. 2356860

File: 1737426023176.png (418.79 KB, 759x699, 1737416637148256.png)


No. 2356863

File: 1737426108047.jpg (526.22 KB, 1220x2097, Screenshot_2025-01-20-23-19-27…)

>>2356860
>We should make bigots be afraid of trans people
>Link related
My sides

No. 2356872

File: 1737426448498.jpg (53.44 KB, 736x736, 1000114532.jpg)


No. 2356878

>>2355138
This is a great win. Trump is really divisive, but I think that this is a really good change of policy. It was crazy that tax dollars were going towards giving incarcerated TIMs hormones.

No. 2356903

>>2356860
Stupid troons are so useless. They will shoot themselves or shoot up a school when they should be shooting the global elite.
You would think with how mentally ill they were they would fucking do that.

No. 2356904

File: 1737426968130.jpg (33.47 KB, 400x400, GGvohGqWkAACn7M.jpg)


No. 2357101

File: 1737433971864.jpg (598.7 KB, 1079x1687, 1000026843.jpg)


No. 2357103

>>2357101
Japan really loves trump

No. 2357131

>>2355190
Not a burger either but
>I think that Trump barely keeps a fuck about women’s rights, he is after approval
Oh absolutely. And it's so, so easy because all he has to do is be sane and not display the extreme, deliberate, sophisticated misogyny of the left and center-left. His retarded lines about women are nothing next to housing dangerous male fetishists in prisons mostly populated by women who grew up with appalling abuse. Caring in the slightest about any kind of violence enacted by minority men, acknowledging our sex, this is all it takes for people to think any camp is better than leftists. They completely deserve this loss, now i hope every TRA becomes irrelevant and a pariah, let them have a taste of their own medicine
>>2356465
Kek same, one nice gay guy and every other TiM happened to be an AGP of some kind (autistic, rapist, etc) or a walled bitter gay scrote. The best they can do is dress normal and not rub their fetish in your face but they still do creepy shit like sign up to women's clubs and go to lesbian bars for that sweet euphoria boner.

No. 2357136

>>2357103
We need westaboo Trump and Vance fanart NOW

No. 2357174

>>2357136
No Trump is memeable but jd Vance is the kind of uncanny ugly I never want to look at if possible

No. 2357277

>>2356429
There are no normal ones, because being abnormal is a prerequisite. They have personality disorders, hence the inability to take criticism.

No. 2357316

>>2356424
Kek I love the admission that if he takes the wig and shitty makeup off, he’ll just go back to being a man and not having to worry. “AFAB people” can’t do that… curious… I wonder why!

No. 2357360

>>2356429
You freaks always whip out this exact line whenever an SSA person talk about getting sexually harassed or even assaulted by trannies and their handmaidens, or when a detransitioner talks about their regrets to medically detransition and getting pressured into it.
Who gives a fuck if normal ones exist when they're not doing jack to police the rapey retards in their midst? Clean up your bullshit crew instead of expecting this nigh-mythical unicorn to be the sole consolation prize for people traumatized by your ideology's proponents.

No. 2357366

>>2357360
>your ideology
go tf back

No. 2357418

File: 1737447611852.jpeg (89.53 KB, 640x626, 1737243946652.jpeg)

>>2356903
Nah, the elite is their sugar daddy. For all troon crying about 'life saving gender treatment' being unavailable or restricted it took a heterosexual Chad to actually do something about the Big Pharma/medical insurance cabal. Actions, not words.

No. 2357428

>>2357366
Did you misread something in my post or are you AIRT who thinks lolcow is some pro-troon site? The thread title is literally 'Gender Ideology Hate Thread', come on

No. 2357432

File: 1737447926338.jpeg (158.7 KB, 1170x711, IMG_0880.jpeg)

Do you think trannies also blame JKR when they finish the toilet paper in the middle of pooping?

No. 2357433

>>2357428
Site has male moderation

No. 2357437

>>2357360
There are lurking retards nonna, simply report them

No. 2357439

>>2357432
Jk Rowling is an idiot but giving her attention is even more idiotic. Harassing and obsessing over a woman instead of ignoring and letting her scream into the void is just idiotic behavior. They continue to platform her and bonus points degrade her and threaten her which is not a normal thing to do. Everyone involved needs to get offline.

No. 2357440

File: 1737448129076.jpg (121.8 KB, 837x478, trump.jpg)


No. 2357444

>>2355138
I kinda wish people could/would differentiate gender and sex. Gender is a nebulous social construct that should be abolished while sex is material reality.

No. 2357448

Love when Rowling makes troons seethe.

No. 2357451

File: 1737448374521.jpeg (55.09 KB, 436x516, total tranny death.jpeg)

>>2357443
Fuck off, tranny.

No. 2357453

>>2357448
Me too it just gives radfems more ammo to vote for right wing misogynists(bait)

No. 2357454

>>2357453
Stop blaming radfems for shit pickmes did.

No. 2357455

>>2357443
They are, one of them literally tried to rape my best friend. We went to middle school with that retard and the very same retard is brainwashing high school kids now in my country, being one of the founders of my country's most prominent trans organization. He is my number one enemy. Seethe.

No. 2357459

File: 1737448563737.jpeg (134.45 KB, 994x791, you.jpeg)

>>2357453
Or perhaps stop being a gross, mentally ill pervert first, tranny.(troonfoiling)

No. 2357460

JK Rowling would have never had fame were it not for the launching of the HP movies in tandem with her book releases. Had she not lucked out, nobody would be listening to her rants anyway. Those were damn good movies that utilized cgi in its inception fantastically like lotr. People had the visual aids and were enchanted by a world that the directors and film crew created, without that she would be literalwho. Why do people talk about her constantly, obsessively.

No. 2357466

the troon baiter got me so mad and emotional since I got harassed and stalked by one of his ilk in real life I wrote a longpost but decided to not post it. Just report and don't engage

No. 2357467

>>2357444
It was a distinction before, now TRAs want to pretend that you can change sex and that a tranny scrote is the same as a female and viceversa, that’s the reason why the ended up where they are now, no one gave a damn about trannies when they were simply transvestites.

No. 2357468

>>2357460
Because she's a woman who gained billions through honest means and spends her money helping other women and her influence to peak women.
If she entered American politics trannies would seethe to death because she'd be either Democrat or independent.

No. 2357469

>>2357466
You’re so wise nonna. Thank you.

No. 2357472

>>2357466
Im sorry that happened to you. We really do need to kill more moids. Especially skinwalkers

No. 2357480

>>2357428
sorry i completely misread it can't lie, didn't realise who you were replying to, thought u were the same anon

No. 2357481

>>2357472
And they’re arctic as if we shouldn’t care, “don’t mind mind these males you stupid bitch! Think about these other males!”
When it’s the same picture. I hate trannies and their handmaidens.

No. 2357488

>>2357480
It's ok nonnie, it is pretty late for us both after all (assuming based on average user nationality). Good night and have another based GC day tomorrow!

No. 2357510

>>2357488
thank you and to you too, nonnie! i was feeling a lot like >>2357466

No. 2357523

File: 1737451137586.jpg (88.98 KB, 1271x295, am.jpg)

I think it's the same tranny invading the Amerifag thread right now:
>>>/ot/2354818

No. 2357531

>>2357523
It's amazing to me that they can't even avoid outing themselves on an imageboard. Whatever part of their brain that's responsible for attention whoring is badly inflamed with them.

No. 2357534

>>2357531
I made them short circuit because I told them I hate trannies AND trump. I guess not understanding nuance is part of their mental illness??

No. 2357536

>>2357534
nta and absolutely

No. 2357543

It would be nice if troons or troon supporters could have more dialogue out of TRANNY GENOCIDE fearmongering. I don't want the 20 to 30 somethings in my workplace to drop dead just because I don't think the loli hentai enjoyer is a real and true and honest woman are you kidding me. The only reason I know any of this is because every single one of them purposely made their porn likes known. I get to laugh at anyone who lets their porn addictions ruin their lives and troons are not exempt kek

>>2357316
I can't wait for the hordes of people just quietly opting out of their oppression and quietly taking their wigs or their pronouns off. ENJOY KEK guess which underclass of people can't opt out

No. 2357545

>>2357543
>TRANNY GENOCIDE
How can they say with a straight face that after witnessing everything happening with palestinian people?

No. 2357547

>>2357545
IIRC, the annual murder rate of trannies gets BTFO by the annual murder rate of women and girls and by miles. Trannies are arguably THE safest form of "marginalized" people in the world even WITH Brazilian moids killing them left and right, and you can use statistics to back this up. There is no tranny genocide if you just do the math. They are lying.

No. 2357551

>>2357547
Oh but boohoo timmy just got told by his mom he can't go by she/her and jerk off to furry porn in his room all day so he's going to kill himself. Don't you feel bad for him? Looking at it from that scale of jobless losers killing themselves because of pornography, that's practically a genocide. You need to do everything in your power up to and including paying for cosmetic surgeries so he can jack off better unless you want him to get murdered by his own noose

No. 2357553

Tifs are the end boss of nlog attention whoring pick mes and I don't feel bad for the majority of them. They are ugly goblins with even worse personalities that expect to be pandered to by other women and invade womens spaces despite being a "man" but stab them in the back after getting what they want. They are misogynistic, love enabling rapists and cheer at violence against women. Tifs are at the same level as the 4chan mass shooter girl for me. They deserve no sympathy and they made their own bed with the numerous health complication they get from taking t. It's pathetic how they act as mindless drones to do the bidding for agps and dogpile every woman that dares to not suck tranny cock hard enough while either completely ignoring or making excuses for transphobic men.

No. 2357555

>>2357543
Calling troons who kill themselves because they look and are treated like men in dresses a genocide is the most offensive shit in the universe. No lillith, weaponizing your suicide isn't the same as being sent to a death camp.

No. 2357559

THE WAY THEY ALWAYS CHOOSE NAMES OF GODDESSES IS SO DISRESPECTFUL AND OBNOXIOUS. YWNBAW AND YWNBAG FAG

No. 2357560

>>2357553
I still don't understand moid sympathy. Even when my internalized misogyny was at its worst I still had a tough time sympathizing with overtly predatory men.

No. 2357563

>>2357534
They can't even correctly identify that anyone who hates trannies isn't some terminally online basement dweller. They want to so so so badly live in the fantasy that transphobes are ugly poor seething losers behind a computer screen that whenever someone even claims to have the majority of bad experiences directly with trannies they get confused, there's no easy buzzword to use or retarded accusation they can throw at you. You can't even say pedophile rapists should die including trannies without them getting on your case kek. That's why they make all these boohoo documentaries about tranny locked up for aggravated rape no. 345893485797 and how you should feel bad for him because male prison isn't affirming and he doesn't get any estrogen injections.

but god forbid if you misgender the rapist tranny. calling him a he will make his dysphoria flare up more than raping women and children with his male penis because conveniently dysphoria never gets in the way of that

No. 2357581

>>2352319
i keep coming back to this because it’s so fucking enraging and sad and awful and everything basically. i hate my country. i hate men. why is everything so fucked up why do they have to ruin everything why do they have to be the worst fucking people in the whole world and so confidently. every man should be ashamed to be a man, in a realistic world.

No. 2357623

>>2355845 kek at the dude saying "that's not an argument, that's a bumper sticker" to the handmaiden

No. 2357645

File: 1737465109043.jpeg (378.57 KB, 750x930, IMG_3503.jpeg)

This put a smile to my face, the high levels of coping and stress put on these trannies necks is hilarious. Trump isn’t even going to do anything about troons unfortunately but watching them be more worried about their fetish masks than anything else is what brings me sweet joy

No. 2357670

>>2357645

troons will still exist, but if this EO goes into affect, they might go into hiding more. sad this had to be made in the first place >>2355138

No. 2357671

File: 1737467113726.png (132.14 KB, 1055x901, trump-eo.png)

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/

Some of what Trump's EO actually says
>Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women’s domestic abuse shelters to women’s workplace showers. This is wrong. Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being.

>“Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively.

>“Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.

>“Gender ideology” replaces the biological category of sex with an ever-shifting concept of self-assessed gender identity, permitting the false claim that males can identify as and thus become women and vice versa, and requiring all institutions of society to regard this false claim as true.


>“Gender identity” reflects a fully internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an infinite continuum, that does not provide a meaningful basis for identification and cannot be recognized as a replacement for sex.


>Agencies shall remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology, and shall cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications or other messages. Agency forms that require an individual’s sex shall list male or female, and shall not request gender identity. Agencies shall take all necessary steps, as permitted by law, to end the Federal funding of gender ideology.


>Federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology. Each agency shall assess grant conditions and grantee preferences and ensure grant funds do not promote gender ideology.


>The Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that males are not detained in women’s prisons or housed in women’s detention centers, including through amendment, as necessary, of Part 115.41 of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations and interpretation guidance regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act.


>The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall prepare and submit for notice and comment rulemaking a policy to rescind the final rule entitled “Equal Access in Accordance with an Individual’s Gender Identity in Community Planning and Development Programs” of September 21, 2016, 81 FR 64763, and shall submit for public comment a policy protecting women seeking single-sex rape shelters.


>Agencies shall effectuate this policy by taking appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity.


The TL;DR of this is that a woman is now defined as a woman and not a mentally ill man in a dress. Men are not permitted in women's single sex spaces. All government funding of pro-troon gender ideology will stop.

No. 2357676

>>2357671
i’m not an amerifag so do you guys think this will actually happen? i feel like it won’t because of how annoying the troons are and will end up being in only certain states

No. 2357680

File: 1737467948824.jpeg (199.35 KB, 828x338, IMG_7655.jpeg)

you will all be free in just 30 days

No. 2357684

>>2357560
They think they can escape womanhood by putting scrotes on a pedestal . They’ll say misogynistic bullshit and be class traitors and yet expect to be welcomed and coddled in women’s spaces since scrotes don’t give a fuck about retarded women. And TIMs use them as an excuse to further invade , look at how they have twisted words around women’s healthcare in the name of inclusion of TIFs ( they just want to not be reminded that women are female).

No. 2357690

File: 1737468265615.jpg (78.26 KB, 648x486, orange man.jpg)

All that tranny Trump seething deserves its own thread on /snow/. Something like 'Pro-/anti- Trump Internet nutjobs'.

No. 2357691

>>2357686
like let me not use it?

No. 2357696

>>2357432
>I've never met a trans person in my entire 20s and I'm a mid 90s millenial
How? I'm in the same age range and I've met 10+ troons in online hobby spaces, and that's just the ones who have been in the same groups as me. I don't even go out of my way to meet them too, literally just existing online especially in any nerdy hobby community will make you encounter them and almost every group I've been in ends up having at least 1 or 2 troons and that stacks up over the years.

I guess if you aren't nerdy maybe you wouldn't encounter them as much but even irl my boomer relatives have told me they've met troons despite living in a small town. Also, troon shit IS part of women's rights, they're literally trying to take away female spaces and protections for women.

No. 2357697

File: 1737468698927.jpg (202.44 KB, 1080x1080, bigot.jpg)

>>2357694

No. 2357699

>>2357696
I've seen so many fucking trannies irl at university and at workplaces. There were so many in my class last semester I'd wait to go to the bathroom until after they had cleared out of the building kek. Not to mention the fucking unending cavalcade of them in my irl hobby events and online spaces. God I wish I were that nona.

No. 2357701

>>2357695
Please don’t reply to the tranny, is it that hard kek. We can keep discussing

No. 2357706

>>2357701
nta but the typos always make me kek so hard

No. 2357707

File: 1737469020867.webp (42.54 KB, 589x600, angry-caveman-cartoon-characte…)

>>2357706
>Which bathroom intersex people suppose use?

No. 2357708

>>2357543
>hordes of people just quietly opting out of their oppression
It's wild that troids ever thought to co-opt oppression. Oppression doesn't simply mean "bad thing", the implication is society needs oppression to keep functioning as it does. Women, workers, slaves are groups who fit this definition. Sexual minorities and other groups are not oppressed but rather disadvantaged. It can be pretty tragic, and caused by an inability to oppress them, like disabled people who are isolated and cannot access many things because you can't easily extract value out of their work and body. Being oppressed can be better than being at a disadvantage, it's a matter of whether your suffering is necessary to maintain an economy or not. Many people are oppressed and disadvantaged at once.
Troons though? They obviously don't qualify for oppression because we do not need an underclass of male porn addicts running around in shein clothing. Most are not disadvantaged in any real way, and can easily opt out of their self-inflicted problem, unlike disabled people. That's how easy they have it. The only troons who "ascend" to disadvantage are kids and adults who suffer physical impairments, i'll assume most are women because roids seemingly fuck you up much more than horse piss does. TiMs are practically exempt from this, only a minority of homosexual troons will have ever tasted true disadvantage. TiMs in STEM fields who do not shower and get made fun of once a month for being a fetishist might be the least disadvantaged group ever, they are akin to inbred pervert aristocrats who throw tantrums in front of a captive court

No. 2357710

>>2357696
I'm into games and my hobby is filled with trannies. I used to go to a big gaming convention years ago, but the last few times, it's become a tranny haven, so I stopped. This person is either lying or never leaves their house. Even at my last government job, I met at least 4 trannies in the year I was there. Always MTF. If you want to be meet Tifs, you go to starbucks.

No. 2357711

>>2357707
this is actually what i picture everytime KEK

No. 2357713

File: 1737469217885.jpg (170.07 KB, 1024x990, read.jpg)

>>2357700
>Trans people who get bottom surgery should be able to use opposite sex spaces
No, they shouldn't because tranny criminals still have male-pattern criminality and pose danger to female inmates. Same goes for any sex-segregated service. They are built around the needs of women, not men.

No. 2357715

File: 1737469294945.png (128.95 KB, 700x700, disabled-toilet-tactile-and-br…)

>>2357704
The ones with this sign.

No. 2357721

My dear nonnitas don’t reply to the retard

No. 2357722

>>2357713
I wish I could post this on ig, where it's filled with people going "It's never a drag queen! those stupid evil christians" Like, it's fucking both.

No. 2357723

>>2357721
disabled toilet nona was funny though

No. 2357725

>>2357523
>second post
As if both things weren't possible at the same time and by two different groups of people. Hell, sometimes even by the same group of people.
>How can group A (which I support) be behind everything you say when it's actually group B (which you support) that's doing all the evil in the world (shit that I'm cherrypicking)? Checkmate Christians!!
Literally just going "NO U!!!11" at rightoids and refusing to exercise critical thought, self-reflection and self-awareness. And apparently there are only two sides in every argument, trannies (the good guys) and everyone else (literally Hitler). Troons have such a childish black-and-white view of the world.
>>2357543
>>2357551
>>2357555
The average person takes the word "genocide" very seriously and troons take advantage of this. Those normal people don't know that the tranny definition of "genocide" is that they want to hold everyone else accountable for trannies committing suicide over being too mentally ill to understand that they'll never be something they weren't born as, or worse, killing themselves after transitioning, being in physical agony for years and realizing the truth. "Genocide" is just a weak excuse to guilt trip the whole world into indulging them. If they kill themselves because they want to be seen as members of the opposite sex but they're not fooling anyone, that's not anyone else's problem but theirs for pretending to be something they're not and making it their life goal and whole (fake) identity.
Fuck society for making up oppressive rules for women and even for men and treating both sexes differently, yes, but what troons cry about is not unfair gender roles, they cry about the fact that people don't recognize them as the opposite sex when they perform those bs gender roles. If anything, troons and TRAs are contributing to the oppression of more GNC and non-heterosexual people, as well as women in general, by upholding the oppressive rules and stereotypes of society. They are more "genocidal" than people who simply don't want to call a male a female, not to mention how they openly threaten and wish harm to all women who oppose their ideology or doesn't handle them with kid gloves.

No. 2357727

File: 1737469670239.png (948.88 KB, 663x1155, gross tranny.png)

>>2357708
>TiMs in STEM fields who do not shower and get made fun of once a month for being a fetishist might be the least disadvantaged group ever, they are akin to inbred pervert aristocrats who throw tantrums in front of a captive court
IT trannies must be my most hated tranny subgroup. Court eunuchs who do the bidding of the elite.

No. 2357729

>>2357727
Allowing trannies to be who they are, degenerates and porn addicts pretending to be women irl, was the biggest societal mistake ever. Women will never be safe. We fought so hard to get taken seriously, and men pull out this card to pretend to be oppressed.

No. 2357730

>>2357713
This. Even men who were chemically castrated used implements to rape their victims instead. It has very little to do with genitals and everything to do with being born and raised male and the entitlement and ego that stems from that. Men are responsible for over 90% of violent crimes and over 90% of rapes/sexual assaults, him cutting off his pp and pretending to be a woman is never going to change that. If anything, a man who gets such a drastic procedure done and is that out of touch with reality is likely even more unhinged and violent than the average man.

No. 2357733

File: 1737470011677.jpg (101.15 KB, 1024x1024, cartoon.jpg)

>>2357710
>Always MTF. If you want to be meet Tifs, you go to starbucks.
Funny how that 'oppression' works in action. I also bet all the troons in government you met had wives and children.

>>2357712

Open a sociology textbook, sweetie.

>>2357722
What's stopping you? Zuck is already sucking Trump's cock - you won't be banned.
>>>/ot/2343556

No. 2357734

>>2357699
That sounds awful. I was lucky at my university classes I didn't see them as much, but even then one of my friends knew a troon and would talk about gender shit despite not being a troon himself. I wish I was that person too, I try to avoid troon shit but it feels near inescapable when any group I join even when it doesn't have troons yet ends up having someone troon out later.
>>2357710
They really infest any community that's more nerdy, it sucks. Already had to deal with retarded men in those communities and now it's that but also retarded men pretending to be women and vice versa on top of it.

No. 2357736

I was thinking about how pronouns are literally just innate and everyone instantly can identify a person as their sex.
In real life, if you were to actually misgender someone, say, calling a masculine looking woman a man because you didn’t have the best view of her, you would immediately apologise profusely and explain yourself.
That’s how the troons act about their supposed misgendering, but 10x more handmaideny and obsessive. back when it was more normal, you would have apologised for actually misgendering them, and went on your way.

No. 2357739

File: 1737470148872.jpg (52.81 KB, 273x275, 1670810048278.jpg)

Did any of you ever experience ''TIF'' thoughts, despite never wanting to troon out? i like reading the tif thread because i have so much in common with some tifs, yet i never wanted to troon out, even if i am a zoomie and had friends who trooned out when i was in hs and i used to be a super cooomer who used to fill the void with gay porn and wanted to be a gay guy to date cute gay moids, i still never wanted to troon out. Do you think you exclusively need body dysmorphia to troon out? but then how do you explain those ''femboy'' tifs that are extremely feminine but with he/him in video, are they just attention whores as opposed to other tifs who are actually mentally ill? i am so confused.

No. 2357744

>>2357739
If you're interested in some tranny infighting look up truscum/tucute/trutrans drama kek. They can't even agree among themselves on the stuff you're bringing up

No. 2357745

File: 1737470498134.jpg (122.27 KB, 698x960, hon.jpg)

>>2357730
True that. Pedophiles remain a risk to children for life, even if they undergo chemical castration. Their proclivities to abuse are only partially modulated by hormones.

>>2357739
Back in the day girls enjoyed BL and role-playing in peace. The tranny agenda is simply using multi-level marketing to branch out to all susceptible groups, like female nerds. The specimen from the TiF thread were just easier to 'sell the product to' than you.

No. 2357750

File: 1737470672413.png (111.46 KB, 600x723, rapist troon.png)

>>2357742
>a man who cuts his dick isn't opressor
Let me introduce you to this cow.

No. 2357751

>>2357739
i always found it retarded a little bit which is why i never went through with it thankfully. i can see why the super young girls get into it, it makes you different, fit in with the boys if the girls bully you etc
and yes, i think you do need exclusively body dysmorphia because that’s what they think gender dysphoria is.
also yes, the ones who do all the they/he shit are just attention whores who want to be different, but all of them are in a way. the corrective rape shit is just so funny with how obvious it makes it, they’re just admitting how much trauma they have as a woman and want to be stealth in public but show off their vagina and boobs on reddit because they’re so far removed from their femininity, they’re just afraid of being touched and don’t have another outlet because of how depressed and obtuse they are for trooning in the first place.

No. 2357758

>>2357739
When I was a kid I got similar feelings to what TIFs seem to experience, yes. I feel like the reason I didn't troon out despite having all the risk factors (anime, socially isolated, autistic, terminally online) is because I'm just not retarded enough to be that delusional that I would unironically think I can become a man kek, I don't know how else to explain it. I also actually consider other people around me, I'm not homophobic and I don't define people by sexist stereotypes or what they wear, so I think that helped.

Also, whether or not you need that to troon out depends on the troon, seems like some do it for that and others troon out just for the fetish. I remember seeing troons having slapfights about that years ago even like >>2357744 said, with some saying you need to have it to be trans and others saying you don't.

No. 2357761

>>2357750
Isn't that the tranny who tried to take down KF?

No. 2357763

>>2357729
>men pull out this card to pretend to be oppressed
NTA but I believe moids are predisposed to sociopathy and narcissism. Many of them do the same when they're forced to go to therapy, they pretend they're actually working with the therapist to treat their issues, but in reality they're just learning the therapist's language so they can manipulate others (including the therapist) later. It can be especially dangerous if the therapist is female.

Also reminder that nobody sees TIMs as "women". Everybody knows they're men and that's why they get "treated like women" (you don't want to make them angry enough to beat the shit out of you like the mentally unstable males they are), in addition to not wanting to be rude to a poor mentally ill retard, especially in this day and age where you can get severely punished for "misgendering" thanks to rich male trannies creating their bullshit orgs to infiltrate and influence every aspect of society.
It's clear as day that nobody sees TIMs as women and TIFs as men when you realize that TIMs always get treated better than TIFs, they're always the ones in media, they're the ones with more privileged lives that they got for being male, they get defended by trannies and TRAs more, etc.

>>2357745
>The tranny agenda is simply using multi-level marketing to branch out to all susceptible groups, like female nerds. The specimen from the TiF thread were just easier to 'sell the product to' than you.
NTA but this is an excellent way to put it

No. 2357765

>>2357739
Yes. I still have "TIF" thoughts, even though I'm fine with being a woman now. I think the common link is having aspects of AAP attraction, which is something you seem to have. I think part of why I'm tomboyish is my AAP. Nothing wrong with it. I think it's kind of fun if you're self-aware about it.
I used to have self esteem problems and considered trooning out because I thought I was ugly and my interests weren't "feminine enough" (whatever that means). Fortunately by the time I had started thinking about this, I was already on 4chan reading moids plainly say that they don't consider TIFs as men, so I have already had had delusion-proof experiences.
Anyone can troon out if they have either low self esteem or just plain old delusion. Being a "real" trans person is not a real thing like being a real woman.

No. 2357775

>>2357680
Nah, I live in Pritzkerland- that degen whale is surely gonna put tranny shit in the state constitution or smth. Illinois will have the schools groom every kid in the state so that at least the next generation will stfu about them housing male rapists in the women's prison. It's sick here.

No. 2357782

>>2357763
>NTA but I believe moids are predisposed to sociopathy and narcissism
also nta but i’ve been thinking about that a lot lately and i completely agree. almost every woman in my life has talked about how even the most well meaning of men just don’t really listen to women, in one ear, out the other.
they kinda dont respect us inherently or anyone around them kek.
some of them will listen to a few of your points, digest some of it, but will always take what you say in the wrong way somehow and start shitfighting with you over stupid things, they’re all emotionally immature, in one way or another.
that’s why TIMS are always fucked, they’re normal emotionally stunted porn sick men, that should just be referred to as crossdressers and do it in their bedrooms, that realise they can latch on to the fact that they can ‘transition’ to this protected-class dreamland where they get to jerkoff to cp and furries all day without being called a man ever again or held accountable. sometimes to attract ‘queer’ women too. there are obviously some less porny and degen ones but all of it comes down to the same kind of thing.
HSTS show they’re men with the misogyny and woman face, I can tolerate them more because they probably won’t rape me but my moid friends instead

No. 2357792

File: 1737472879421.png (159.87 KB, 1332x1112, 1733802852994.png)

>>2357782
>to jerkoff to cp and furries all day without being called a man ever again or held accountable.
>pic related colinarmis
I don't understand why they can't even be slightly criticized for 'transitioning' because of pedophilia and literally wanting to be a little girl. what is the actual reason. why are there only a handful of fucking websites that you can say that actually the man who transitioned because of hentai maybe isn't a woman deep inside and his endless issues stemming from the fact he isn't a female child are self inflicted and autopedo in origin

No. 2357796

>>2357775
i’m the non amerifag and that sucks, i’m sorry.
amerinonnas please keep us updated with the reality of everything happening, i’m so curious. i’m actually surprised to see he did anything tbh, i really didn’t expect that in particular, but a win is a win

No. 2357811

>>2357739
>i used to be a super cooomer who used to fill the void with gay porn and wanted to be a gay guy to date cute gay moids
Same but I did want to troon out, in addition to wanting a cute relationship like the ones in yaoi I wanted a dick to dominate moids with it, but thankfully I was told that I was just a masculine/unfeminine girl, which is normal, and that one day I'd find a straight boy who is my type and likes me for how I am, and I understood this perfectly. The reason I became obsessed with getting a "sex change" was that I was terribly uninformed about the meat tube surgery, I just knew it was "possible" to give a woman an artificial penis. Later I found out that having a real, functional dick as a female is impossible (I was underage and dumb). All in all I just wanted a dick to have power over moids kek
>Do you think you exclusively need body dysmorphia to troon out?
I think people with body dysmorphia are more prone to getting to the "bottom surgery" stage. Even though I wanted a dick, I didn't hate my female body, and thankfully I've never been raped or molested so there's no major sexual trauma either. Sexual trauma with or without body dysmorphia likely increases the chances of getting the full surgery.
>but then how do you explain those ''femboy'' tifs that are extremely feminine but with he/him in video, are they just attention whores as opposed to other tifs who are actually mentally ill?
Both are mentally ill imo. The "femboy" fakeboys are probably traumatized in some way, since women may become hypersexual or degrade themselves to "regain control" of their own bodies/sexuality as a coping mechanism. But it's possible that a severe porn addiction combined with the influence from fellow terminally online teens who are exposed to porn and tranny propaganda 24/7 might result in this behavior without that kind of trauma.
>>2357765
>I think part of why I'm tomboyish is my AAP. Nothing wrong with it. I think it's kind of fun if you're self-aware about it.
I'm glad to see another on here who feels the same about it. It's an "oops" moment for me because I'm against gender roles but I still assign gendered meaning to clothes but what can you do at this point? I grew up like this. As long as you don't troon out it's harmless, at least we're self-aware and know it's contradictory. But tbh I've been trying to curb the AAP a little and to change the way I see clothes to be more neutral. I think it's harder to do when everyone around you is committed to seeing clothes, hairstyles, etc. as male or female. My mother in particular loves saying that I'm trying to be a man, when I'm not and all I did was have a certain style that's focused on coolness and comfort rather than being fuckable in the eyes of men.

No. 2357840

>>2357444
>Gender is a nebulous social construct
There's literally nothing "nebulous" about the calculated oppression of girls and women. Only one sex deals with oppressive gender roles and expectations. This "let's separate sex and gender! you can be a male woman!!" tranny mindset is what got us here in the first place. In order to abolish gender, you must acknowledge it has everything to do with your sex and there's nothing nebulous about it.
>>2357439
>Jk Rowling is an idiot
Where are all you "not like other trannies" coming from kek. She was an idiot back when she pandered to troons, she's now unfathomably based. go back.

No. 2357846

>>2357765
>and his endless issues stemming from the fact he isn't a female child are self inflicted and autopedo in origin
Kek this. The vast majority of TIMs wouldn't want to be women if they didn't consume pornography at all or fetishized the very existence of women and girls let alone everything associated with them. Trannyism in straight men is derived mainly from being a pervert who's incapable of empathizing with women and instead sees them as this wonderful alien thing made for him to coom to.

No. 2357854

>>2357730
You nailed it. People who advocate for chemical castration are thinking of regular men (who make up most rapists) and the fact that having a organ that can penetrate is arguably the biggest physical factor that allows them to rape. But most TiMs are paraphiles/perverts and perverts do not exactly get off penetration, hence why sadists (as an example) will use objects and torture alongside "typical" rape methods. Castration doesn't cut off the mechanism by which they gain pleasure because it's located elswhere than in intercourse, that's why they're considered perverts in the first place.

No. 2357863

>>2357840
nta. thanks for saying that, i wanted to sperg about this earlier when the tif was posting. gender and sex is the same thing, you can be fucking gnc without being a man or enbie, for all i care chop your tits off, but you are a woman and that’s completely okay.
you are fine being a more masculine women if that’s what you are, mature adult women won’t judge you for that.
nothing strips you of being a woman and you should be proud to be one, even if you aren’t feminine at all, after all, the TIMS still get to use all of their male privilege, while the TIFS have nothing.

No. 2357869

>>2357840
Yes who invited the handmaidens?? Weird shift in the past few and I suspect it's all coming from one or two Interlopers.

No. 2357889

>>2357840
NTA but it all depends on the angle you take. Yours is correct, but you can also say gender is "nebulous" as in, gender norms rapidly change with trends and deeper social shifts. It changes depending on where you live, even if the ideological content is the same (subjugation of women). Sex is unchanging in comparison. Troons using the distinction that 2nd wave feminists made to mean the reverse doesn't mean we should throw it away. Troons say "sex=/=gender because gender norms are sex", we mean "sex=/=gender because everyone has a sex but you're not naturally destined to be submissive, it's not a fact of nature like large gametes". It's the total opposite, if anything we should reformulate it so it doesn't get confused with gendie talk. Not defending AYRT because i don't get why they even answered this to the list

No. 2357894

File: 1737476389736.png (807.11 KB, 889x673, frog.png)


No. 2357899

File: 1737476517119.jpeg (61.45 KB, 379x379, 5DAC097E-3363-4206-8899-DF760C…)

>>2357761
ntayrt but yeah that’s the troon with big tech contacts and is autistically fixated on taking down KF. He’s gross and into degenerate BDSM and furry shit. His husband’s wedding look is one of the most unfortunate I have seen.

No. 2357926

File: 1737478050592.png (870.47 KB, 1600x2000, 76122080-c75c-4e1b-adb0-db0a5f…)

"Protect gay kids from insane parents and social media"

No. 2357939

>>2357926
they did it wrong, it should be "protect kids FROM trans and nonbinary" how silly of them

No. 2357941

>>2357926
Cool art, awful message

No. 2357945

>>2357854
to truly castrate a man you'd have to cut his brain out, not his dick

No. 2357958

>>2357811
>I still assign gendered meaning to clothes but what can you do at this point?
I wish the "clothes have no gender" thing died. Some clothes reinforce gender roles on purpose and are made to the female shape. Only clothes with no gender are stuff like hoodies and even then they make them "more female" on purpose sometimes.

No. 2357962

>>2357889
>as in, gender norms rapidly change with trends and deeper social shifts. It changes depending on where you live, even if the ideological content is the same (subjugation of women). Sex is unchanging in comparison.
That's still not what nebulous means, and gender norms don't really change that fast. Yes, they differ depending on how much of a fascist hub of misogyny your country is, but it's still the same old misogyny, everyone knows what a woman is and which sex should be the one forced to wear burkas and/or forced into sex slavery. I do understand what you mean and partially agree, but I don't think we can salvage the term "gender" for any kind of feminist discussion after what trannies have done to it. Gender used to be a cleaner synonym for sex and used interchangeably, anyways. I think just calling it "misogynistic roles/expectations" would suffice, especially considering "gender roles" has this MRA/gendie connotation that boys and men are also forced to fulfill certain oppressive "roles" when in reality they're the default and their privilege allows them to do whatever the fuck they want all the time. Putting the focus back on women and girls would be more benefitial imo.

No. 2357964

>>2357645
The president wants to start war in different countries but troons are only concerned about themselves.i hope they get drafted.

No. 2357971

>>2357645
this just is annoying. Like as usual, rapist/pedo Trump gets in office and is gonna get rid of MORE womens rights and what happens?
Oh, right!
Women get shamed and trannies get sympathy. It's always about shaming women and virtue signaling for the troons who are told no matter how much they mutilate themselves they are biologically male.
These assholes have no idea what real oppression is like.

No. 2357981

>>2357964
The way they only care about themselves when Trump has been doing other crazy stuff , like wanting to leave the WHO organization. The tranny stuff is the only same thing he has proposed so far.

No. 2357984

>>2357981
Sane.
I wonder how these 4 years will turn out so far kek

No. 2357985

>>2357671
>>2357676
Same, also not an amerifag but this seems too good to be true. Would this mean all the women's sports team who've been attempting to sue either schools or organizations for forcing them to accept a violent moid into their team would get an instant win? I'm pretty sure the brave ladies at the volleyball team who were part of one of the biggest lawsuits ended up losing. Would the verdict change if these laws protecting sex over gender identity are enforced?

No. 2357986

File: 1737480150409.jpeg (79.7 KB, 200x200, IMG_0881.jpeg)


No. 2357988

>>2357739
Yes, i think I just got the female version of agp though. I fucking love yaoi and prefer dressing in men's clothes, i used to go online and larp as a gay man because it made me horny. But I do not gaf about being female, its like if I cared if I was right handed or left handed, it doesn't not matter outside of the annoying way women are treated that you have to occasionally deal with. Being a man would be sexy in theory but being a tif isn't appealing at all. I have a lot in common with tifs too which is why I don't usually go on that thread… if I were just slightly more unhinged I'd be amongst them

No. 2358001

File: 1737481175447.jpg (42.64 KB, 468x656, images-1.jpg)

>>2357958
Some dresses are only for women even if dresses, robes and skirts that fit masculine men (in a good way, nonetheless) exist. Wearing something made for women makes them look like that one direction guy, terribly wrong and off-putting. That's why the type of clothing matters, a dress can be an universal concept for males and females, but they are made with gender in mind and some of them only fit women's curves (and constrict them too). I want people to accept this and stop playing into gendie delusions.

No. 2358006

>>2357739
>TIF thoughts
Those bpdemons do NOT have a monopoly on being a fujo
>Are the feminine women who want to be called he/him just attention whores?
Yes. It's fucking obnoxious but some women are addicted to getting attention.
Literally all TIFs I have met take everything way too seriously, are turbo dramatic, and/or have legit trauma they refuse to face head on so they ruin themselves.

No. 2358008

>>2358001
This. There is masculine and feminine clothing for sure. A man wearing feminine clothing will look more faggy/AGP but that doesn't mean a man can't look masculine in a properly designed dress/skirt.
Just like how women can look butch in certain clothes but can still look feminine in properly designed pants/suit

No. 2358009

>>2358001
>>2357958
there's nothing wrong with wearing any type of clothing regardless of who it's supposed to be intended for. Clothes do not have a gender, because it's fabric and stitching, even if it looks bad on a moid. This rhetoric is why moids in spinny skirts think they're women. Stop attributing my biology to an off the shoulder top for god's sake. Literal troon logic but calling anons who disgaree with it "gendies."

No. 2358013

>>2358008
Yeah obviously there's masculine and feminine clothing but some people want to intentionally look the opposite of what's expected of them. If you suppress that they will claim an identity that doesn't belong to them

No. 2358014

>>2358009
I think wearing children's clothes is wrong though don't you?

No. 2358016

>>2358008
>A man wearing feminine clothing will look more faggy/AGP but that doesn't mean a man can't look masculine in a properly designed dress/skirt.
This, that's why I'm tired of the "clothes have no gender" shit. They absolutely do from the moment they get conceptualized. They make girl's clothes more constructing that boy's on purpose.
Just let women wear whatever they want. That's all I ask for. No gender shit has to be included in that conversation.

No. 2358018

File: 1737482034407.jpg (613.42 KB, 2542x3000, 1000013117.jpg)

>>2358001
God I hate this, he looks so fucking disgusting. Men could wear dresses and look sexy but they never so that, they always insist on wearing tight fitting dress meant for bosoms and hips. There's an untapped market of men's dresses that could be designed

>>2358009
If anyone can wear anything why to men look so disgusting in women's clothes

No. 2358025

>>2357792
with the way they always compare themselves to black people they must realise that black people despite being an entire race never got defended as hard as trannys, and they’ve been copping shit since forever.
why is a group of actual degenerate mentally ill retards more of a protected-class than black people as a whole in the current society we live in? we all know why!

No. 2358026

File: 1737482342597.jpg (17.79 KB, 455x673, images-4.jpg)

>>2358009
>there's nothing wrong with wearing any type of clothing regardless of who it's supposed to be intended for.
No. THIS is the rethoric that tumblrinas pushed onto the public in the 2010s and why men feel so valid when wearing female shaped dresses, because "clothes have no gender so I can wear my spinny spinny dress hehe!" It's a fetish, you're validating their fetish by telling them a dress made for women is not gendered therefore they could also wear it. It's retarded. Some dresses are made with the female body in mind, that itself is biology, men don't have our curves not even with surgeries. If men want to wear dresses, there's a plethora of male shaped dresses and skirts they can choose from and look less ridiculous. Why do they always want to wear the girly ones?

No. 2358031

>>2358018
>Why do men look disgusting in womens clothes?
because men wear womens clothes to objectify women. It's a fetish for them.
Women don't get "gender euphoria wetness" from wearing flannel or a suit. If men could be normal about dressing feminine it really wouldn't be a problem.

No. 2358037

File: 1737482721218.jpg (67.59 KB, 500x666, tumblr_nvadouPbtJ1s5lwvvo1_500…)

>>2358026
They also look stupid and ugly in these clothes regardless of ~societal expectations~ and ~patriarchy~ because the clothing isn't designed, tailored or meant to fit their bodies. I don't understand how this ever became something controversial or up for discussion. Even in the 90s when moids wore dresses, they were custom fit and "male dresses" (and they still looked dumb to most women)

No. 2358038

File: 1737482760413.jpeg (101.9 KB, 736x981, 4571C16B-A38C-49ED-AD7C-42B151…)

>>2358018
>If anyone can wear anything why to men look so disgusting in women's clothes
There are some men who manage to wear womens clothing that don't look disgusting. I think it just depends on dressing for what suits your body, there's always been alternative men who know how to look good in androgynous fashion. Gendering clothing is retarded, and only helps trannies and conservatives.

No. 2358039

>>2358037
Is this supposed to be an example of a 90's moid in a dress because that's a leather jacket buttoned/zipped up.

No. 2358043

>>2358038
Is this supposed to be an example of men looking good?
Try someone who isn't an AIDS patient.

No. 2358044

>>2358038
That looks disgusting to me. It looks like he's getting off to the idea of himself and I hate the way the clothing hangs on his emaciated body. I also can't stand that expression, troons always make that weird coomy face in photos and I immediately clock them as fetishists, just by that now

No. 2358047

>>2358039
I was looking for the one from the Everlasting Gaze video, which is actually 00s but then gave up

No. 2358051

File: 1737483111286.png (56.46 KB, 772x594, TIF.PNG)

>>2357739
>Did any of you ever experience ''TIF'' thoughts, despite never wanting to troon out?
Yes, I never trooned out because I was too shy to even draw attention to myself and had no friends online. But I fit the archetype to a T. I struggled with internalized misogyny a lot as a teenager, but I'm glad I never trooned out. I would have likely become more and more unhappy while taking hormones. But would make excuses never to detransition. Thankfully I am now proud of being a woman and don't see it as shameful. I recommend everyone to read this essay and for lurking TIFs or ex-TIFs to cope with unhappy emotions in a healthy way. Like art or exercise.
https://funkypsyche.substack.com/p/the-archetypal-ftm-sensitive-quirky

No. 2358054

>>2358026
yeah wearing the dress is a fetish but now that creepy but overall harmless fetish is being validated by anons like you who supported gender = clothes. Let them have that dumb fucking fetish if it means they're not going to share a changeroom with me because of it, jesus.

No. 2358055

File: 1737483243195.png (3.59 MB, 1600x2400, BR7.png)

>>2358018
>If anyone can wear anything why to men look so disgusting in women's clothes
they can look cute if they arent fat or ugly. They key is that they gotta be fit. Just like how fat women dont look good in most clothes but a good looking woman can rock a sack of potatoes.

No. 2358057

>>2358055
This still looks goofy.

No. 2358059

>>2358057
i like it, i just wish he would shave his bear legs.

No. 2358060

>>2358009
>Clothes do not have a gender, because it's fabric and stitching
Fabric and stitching designed for a specific sex in mind. Clothes for men will have wider shoulders, and clothes for women will consider space for breasts and hips. Not every man has broad shoulders, and not every woman has curves, but most do, and clothes are absolutely designed with a sex in mind, idiot.

No. 2358063

>>2358055
I would never a fuck a man in this outfit and the vast majority of women wouldn't either. I don't know why this image would do anything to change that, this looks like pure attention-seeking mental illness anon

No. 2358069

>>2358060
nta but by pushing that narrative you are basically doing what troons what. Remember that their fetish is that they are doing something ''taboo'' if we took the taboo out wearing female clothes AGPs wouldnt get off to it.
>>2358063
the vast majority of women fuck ugly old troglodytes so their opinion is shit by default. My point wasnt to get you to fuck you, but to see any attractive person can look good in anything.

No. 2358070

>>2358055
This outfit looks AGP.
Can you try to find a man in a masculine dress please?

No. 2358075

>>2358070
>masculine dress
not such a thing, dresses are by default feminine. That doesnt mean a man cant wear one.

No. 2358076

>>2358038
This shit still looks disgusting, did you really think posting ching-hon Jeffree star would prove your point?
>Nooo, you gotta validate ugly moids in dresses or youre helping trannies and conservatives!!
We've already coddled trannies to hell and back and it didn't turn out well for us, try something else.

No. 2358078

>>2358060
no one's arguing that clothes aren't designed with sex based proportions in mind, we're arguing that those characteristics shouldn't stop people from wearing them regardless, because that suppression manifests itself as delusions about identity, and we're still dealing with those ramifications today as those delusions bully their way into female exclusive society. Why are you so terminally brain dead that you can't even follow along to finding the point of someone's argument?
You signed off that post like some smug LSA fag.

No. 2358081

>>2358055
>>2358038
This shit is still nasty… #2 is not sexy at all. Fat women do look good in clothes though, they still got boobs for the dress to frame, this flower print clinging to his hulking chest isn't doing to at ALL. You don't gotta throw fat women under the bus when clearly what you're saying still isn't true

No. 2358084

>>2358038
>Gendering clothing is retarded, and only helps trannies and conservatives.
But clothes are gendered, that's reality. There's a female and male section at the store, you're welcomed to wear whatever you want, nobody is denying that, but designers will always think of female, male, or the rare genderless case when designing new clothes. Trannies need to be shamed when wearing things intended for women. They go beyond crossdressing and they make wearing female clothes their whole personality, but sure clothes have no gender. Biology is absolutely thought of when making clothes, why do you think boxers and briefs have a dick pocket and female thongs don't? Unless they design those items for the opposite sex. Then in those cases male thongs have dick pockets and female boxers don't.

No. 2358086

>>2358069
Literally untrue, are you forgetting men only started trooning out en masse the second being gay became widely accepted and mainstream? Back when you'd get called a faggot for crossdressing instead of praised by an army of handmaidens, none of them were trannies. Lying to misogynistic effeminate moids and "YASS KWEEN"ing them will only result in a bigger tranny boom, not enlightened woke GNC male allies, you retard.

No. 2358087

File: 1737483898671.jpg (130.25 KB, 610x784, 7277ced9ae52d96ca13ab5b64f2f48…)

>>2358069
>pushing that narrative you are basically doing what troons what
nta but if not wanting to see feminized moids in stretched lycra bodycon or "fitted" schoolgirl uniforms makes me a handmaiden for troons than consider me picrel
>>2358075
>dresses are by default feminine
I don't think moids should wear dresses because they look stupid in them but kilts exist and you sound retarded not acknowledging that

No. 2358088

>>2358076
Just say you like ugly suits and men that look like the missing link and move on. The only reason why we have AGPs and gay troons is because its not accepted for men to wear female clothes and most female clothes are seen as taboo and emasculating. If lingerie was unisex we wouldnt have serial killers like Russel Williams and Jerry Brudos.

No. 2358093

>>2358038
I'll give you this: I don't think crossdressing is always a bad thing, but moids tend to make it look gross and disgusting on purpose. Only guy I can think of NOT making it disgusting is Mana from Malice Mizer. But at the end of the day he's a guy wearing feminine clothes.
Anyway, most clothes look good on women but men never look good wearing a short skirt and tights found at the clearance section of H&M and that's always what they reach for, let's not kid ourselves here. They're retarded and can't help but look disgusting, because it's not about looking good for them, it's about making their sexual fantasies come true. That's the difference between your average troon and someone like Mana.

No. 2358094

>>2358088
KEK suuuure, anon.

No. 2358096

>>2358091
>>2358087
Are kilts and tunics dresses?

No. 2358098

>>2358087
kilts are still dresses and ugly as shit ugly at that. You are basically doing what men want by only accepting ''dresses'' they deem as alpha wolf chad and making feminine dresses emasculating and gay. Look at how sexualized that dress is on the woman vs those scrotes in kilts.

No. 2358102

File: 1737484142890.png (Spoiler Image,587.7 KB, 675x675, 35434535645.png)

Only Sonic men can get away with wearing dresses.

No. 2358103

>>2358091
>sexier
>looks like a literal burqa
>shows 0 curves
topkek meanwhile ''female'' dresses are hyper sexualized and show tits and ass

No. 2358104

>>2358076
no what you did is gatekeep dresses and said "women only" and now you have self-identified "women" hungry for more than just the dresses. The "opression" they deluded themselves with would've ended with just dresses if they were only allowed to do that, it's the fact that you retards attached that fabric construction to an entire being, humanity, biology, physiology, skeleton, etc that got us where we are now. If we left womanhood at just "utuerus only, xx chromosomes only." we would've been safe, but anons like you and that other LSA sounding fag had to attribute our biology to dresses that made them think "hm I can't get the other features but I can put on a dress and lipstick. Close enough."

No. 2358105

>>2358094
>cant even give a proper argument
thanks for proving me right

No. 2358107

>>2358088
Men now than ever are less shamed and even encouraged to wear feminine clothes and they still call themselves femboys or troon out. You need to realize it's men that are the problem, no matter how much you tell them they're valid to wear a dress, they're going to make it retarded. It's the same "we need to validate men's feelings!" thing. We validated them, now what? They're as violent as they have always been.

No. 2358108

>>2358105
You're welcome, retardchan.

No. 2358109

File: 1737484225708.jpg (42.91 KB, 570x854, 1000013118.jpg)

>>2358075
Not true, they just don't design dresses for men often. You could argue he's wearing pants but without the pants I think it would be sexier quite honestly…

>>2358088
Even if you removed the gendered tag, women would still wear stuff that flatters their frame and agps would copy it despite the disparity. Some tops are made to look good on tits. If you wanna remove that it's women clothes and just make it "tit friendly clothes" we are going dangerously into "birthing person" territory

No. 2358110

>>2358109
THAT.IS.A.TUNIC

No. 2358112

>>2358078
wearing clothes that dont fit your proportions looks bad, makes for a bad outfit

ergo, men in clothes designed for women's bodies look bad in them

No. 2358113

>>2358069
Samefag, but you seem to be widely misinterpreting the taboo aspect of agps. Crossdressing hasn't been taboo in decades. That's precisely what got them to troon out in the first place. They need to take it a step further and larp as women. The new taboo is invading women's spaces, forcing people to use female pronouns despite looking clearly male, flashing their genitals at women's toilets while everyone is clearly uncomfortable, winning prizes and competitions meant for women and girls. Being "just" a crossdressing faggot is no longer enough, that's why they need to appropriate womanhood. This won't go away if we normalize crossdressing because it was never about that, it's about the thrill of getting away with being a sexpest, oppressing women and violating our boundaries. Do you also believe the retarded "we just want to pee!!!" excuse too? think we should normalize gender neutral toilets too?

No. 2358114

The truth is that only AGPs are getting off to wearing ''female'' clothes, because its strongly tied to sexualization and taboo. TIFs arent getting off to wearing pants because male clothes isnt sexualized. If we took the sexualization aspect out of clothes(aka the gendering) AGPs wouldnt get a thrill out of wearing lingerie because men can wear lingerie too and so its not hot anymore.

No. 2358115

File: 1737484355978.jpg (26.68 KB, 452x679, images-3.jpg)


No. 2358116

>>2358088
Just say you like trannies and gtfo, retardnona. No1currs about your crossdressing fetish, quit defending this shit in gender ideology hate thread.

No. 2358117

>>2358109
maybe men just need to excercise and get hot bodies that fit in those clothes then. That guy you posted is ugly and fat and its why he has to cover his ugly fridge body in a amish dress

No. 2358122

File: 1737484491323.jpg (71.31 KB, 1280x720, I+would+not,+could+not,+in+a+b…)

>>2358115
picrel but with moids wearing stupid dresses, skirts or tank tops meant for women (not cut for their bodies, designed in any way to look good on them)

No. 2358124

>>2358115
thats just a suit with a skirt anon pls what do you guys have against men showing their chest and pecs, why do you want them fully covered while dresses hold women thight like they are rotisserie chickens and expose their tits, ass back and legs? why is it only for women to wear trashy sexualized clothes but when men do it its trashy and gay?

No. 2358125

>>2358104
Is it possible for someone to be this retarded? Read >>2358113 .
>"If you had given trannies an inch, they wouldn't have taken a mile!!!!"
Are you forgetting we already did, you tranny cocksucking autist? Women worldwide praised and encouraged moids to be GNC, and this is how shit ended up, with trannies raping us in our own prisons and bathrooms

No. 2358129

>>2358109
no you idiot, there would never be a need for "tit-friendly clothing" because clothing designs wouldn't be delegated to a specific sex. Walking through the male and female section of the store would have similar or the same designs. The only difference would be the proportions. and inb4 "but then they'd fetishize our proportions" okay and they'd still be mentally ill for that but there's no case you can make about being oppressed for clothes that everyone wears, not fitting body parts you don't have. "I'm oppressed because the female cargo shorts that I want, but own in the male design, don't have extra space in the groin area for a dick and balls, that females don't have." is just retarded.

No. 2358130

>>2358114
We cannot take the sexualization aspect out of women's clothes because female hypersexualization and objectification is kind of a core part of our oppression. Can autists abstain from brainfarting ITT already

No. 2358132

>>2358122
all those clothes used to be unisex before. You can dislike them but no need to shill insecure straight moid narratives that only fuel gender ideology.

No. 2358133

>>2358129
The reason most clothing looks the way it does in the first place is to accentuate features of each sex, which are different. How the fuck are you calling people autists and want everyone walking around in futuristic space uniforms from the 60s?

No. 2358134

>>2358114
>If we took the sexualization aspect out of clothes(aka the gendering)
Maybe "we" don't need to take out the reality that female and male clothes exist in this world and simply shame troons into feeling like the gross sex perverts they are whenever they reach out for the tight short skirts at the garbage bin. Coddling them does nothing. They're the ones sexualizing normal clothes whenever they put them on, and it's not our fault they do. Trust me, even something like wide female pants and a loose pink sweater is enough to trigger their "euphoria" aka get an erection. Maybe they're the problem.

No. 2358136

>>2358088
No idea why you're being booed, you're right. A lot of feminine clothing looks dumb as hell on women too but we're so conditioned to see it as normal. If nobody gave a fuck about gendered clothing then moids wouldn't be getting off to the taboo of crossdressing

No. 2358138

>>2358130
>We cannot take the sexualization aspect out of women's clothes
then how come pretty much all of the ''feminine'' clothes used to be unisex before? crotops were common with men in the 80s.

No. 2358139

>>2358104
Who forbade men in the first world from dressing like faggots? Are you implying one or two anons here calling them ugly lead to trannies becoming the male supremacist woman hating psychopath buffalo bills they are now? classic TRA victim blaming kek.

No. 2358140

>>2358124
Post good examples then

No. 2358142

>>2358134
>simply shame troons into feeling like the gross sex perverts they are whenever they reach out for the tight short skirts at the garbage bin
they get off to that, what dont you get? they like feeling like gross perverts for wearing female clothes that make them feel emasculated, why do you think sissys exist?

No. 2358143

>>2358138
Were skirts and dresses also unisex? Was underwear unisex?

No. 2358144

>>2358140
I posted one, not my problem its not up to your taste because men showing an inch of skin makes you uncomfortable(while the same outfit on a woman wouldnt)

No. 2358146

>>2358110
But if he wore it as a dress and took the pants off it would be so sexy

>>2358117
He's ripped under there. I don't like seeing muscles in tight clothes, it doesn't work, i like the reveal when you lift up and he's fucking BUILT

>>2358114
The things men sexualize and women sexualize are different, the clothes are only accentuating it. Mens clothes don't often plunge or reveal a lot of leg or cling to their ass cause it's not really doing anything for me. Womens clothes clinging to tits is sexy not because of the clothes, but because of the tits. The clothes are accentuating the sexy body underneath. That's why it doesn't look sexy on a flabby middle aged guy, the body underneath is not sexy

No. 2358148

File: 1737484862060.png (41.54 KB, 500x461, feels-wojak.png)

>>2358136
Anons are able to put her stupid arguments to rest immediately because she's wrong. It's nice that you have each other though

No. 2358149

>>2358136
>If nobody gave a fuck about gendered clothing then moids wouldn't be getting off to the taboo of crossdressing
Moids literally skinwalk our bodies, you idiot. Even if we all dressed in boring gender neutral grey mumus, they'd still be stuffing their shirts with fake tits and padding their hips to imitate us and fetishize our bodies.

No. 2358150

>>2358143
>Were skirts and dresses also unisex?
yes, retard you can google and find tons of examples of victorian boys wearing dresses

No. 2358152

>>2358149
You just moved the goalposts just now, we're talking about clothing.

No. 2358154

>>2358146
>I don't like seeing muscles in tight clothes, it doesn't work
wah wah male sexualization makes me uncomfy only women should show off their tits and ass in tight dresses! you should really ask yourself why it makes you uncomfortable that men show skin but not women

No. 2358155

>>2358150
All results of victorian boys show pants and shorts, retardnona. Also, victorian=the 80s now? kek. Btw, a kilt is not a skirt. Now: were dresses gender neutral? was underwear gender neutral?

No. 2358157

>>2358149
when an anon moves the goal post then you know they lost and are too chicken shit to admit it kek

No. 2358158

>>2358152
No, YOU'RE claiming moids wouldn't want to skinwalk women if crossdressing wasn't taboo and I'M proving you wrong, retard. Men are interested in skinwalking US and they'd still do it even if men crossdressing was the norm. Dragqueens and troons aren't just dresses and glitter, but trying to skinwalk our inherently female sex characteristics too.

No. 2358160

>>2358132
when have
>dresses, skirts or tank tops meant for women (not cut for their bodies, designed in any way to look good on them)
been ackshually for moids anon? Was there some time in history where clothing was tailored/cut to fit a woman's proportions but moids had breasts, smaller shoulders, wider hips, shorter torsos and longer legs (on average) and were able to wear them too? Because I think you mean male tank tops, kilts and tunics. Clothing specifically cut and designed for the male body. Like what we've been yelling into the void

No. 2358161

>>2358157
When an anon has no answer and just claims you "moved goalposts" when you didn't you already know she lost and is too retarded to come up with an answer.

No. 2358162

>>2358155
>Also, victorian=the 80s now?
?? are you stupid you dont understand they are two different examples?
>were dresses gender neutral? was underwear gender neutral?
look at how sexualized female dresses and underwear are then ask yourself again why men underwear doesnt look like that. Put that deathfat hamster you have in your brain to work and think about why that is.

No. 2358163

>>2358154
It's not sexualization cause I don't find it sexy. If I hated sexualizing men I wouldn't want to see them naked in briefs. You are just retarded and cannot argue tight clothes look bad without strawmanning

No. 2358165

>>2358158
nta but no one said that. We said that men wouldnt get off to wearing female clothes if they werent gendered. The thing is most AGPs get off to the clothing part first.

No. 2358166

>>2358158
I said that moids wouldn't find wearing feminine clothing titillating if there was some world where all clothes were inherently unisex. Calm down before you pull something.

No. 2358168

>>2358154
>I don't like seeing fetishitic moids in clothing that is too small because it's meant for a little girl or younger teenager
ftfy

No. 2358169

>>2358160
no one is talking about cuts retard, we are talking about the clothes themselve. AGP scrotes arent cumming to female hoodies ebcause female hoodies arent sexualized like dresses and lingerie.

No. 2358171

>>2358150
Children wore dresses because they were the more convenient option and it was expensive to buy clothes for a child that would grow out of it pretty fast. these dresses were also not made with cleavage, didn't cling to the waist and didn't have to accommodate ape shoulders. I'm tired of people yass queening abominations like harry styles in a dress when it looks horrible on men and will continue to do so if moids just wear clothes made for female body types. I don't care that something men wore in the past could also be loosely defined as a dress when in 98% of cases it was just robes and the remaining 2% was still made for mens bodies and looked goofy anyway.

No. 2358172

>>2358162
Are you too retarded to understand I was asking you about the specific decade you mentioned and not the fucking victorian era? especially when it's not even true and boys did not wear skirts back then? KEK.
I think you need to put your atrophied autist brain to work for once and come up with a counterargument instead of word salad. Let me know when you're able to formulate a proper thought if you haven't gooned your brain to death yet from all the sissy porn you're consooming, that is.(infighting)

No. 2358173

>>2358163
>tight clothes look bad
to you, i find your mormon faggot hideous and boring. Literally just wearing a long tshirt that looks like a grandpa pajamas

No. 2358176

File: 1737485390511.jpeg (282.73 KB, 1500x2000, b31918e6-c9ca-4bff-a3f8-aa215c…)

>>2358162
wow look at how ~sexualized~ the average pair of panties look in any department stores. I guess when women aren't going to literal lingerie stores like Victoria Secret, there are more options.

If your complaint is that they're cut too short, there are full brief style grandma panties you can wear to your tumblr-feminist hearts content anon

No. 2358180

>>2358168
moving the goalpost again, we were talking about dresses and now its about clothes for little girls? what?

No. 2358184

>>2358171
fun fact ''female clothes'' is trashy as fuck too you are just used to seeing it because men imposed it to you. Its very telling you only find whore clothes ''right'' on women but suddently its too much and haram on men.

No. 2358185

>>2358172
Did you know that in the 18th and 19th century, all babies wore dresses until they could walk? And did you know that pink used to be a boys' color but that changed around WW2? I've got another fun fact for you: high heels used to be worn by men. It was a symbol of prestige but fell out of fashion around the 1700s-ish

No. 2358187

>>2358165
And you're still wrong, agps would find a way to agp even if we all dressed in boring gray gender neutral robes. The taboo part is violating women's boundaries, not just "tehee these are GURL clothes and they make my pp hard!!". Female clothing isn't always gendered, it's built for a specific sex in mind because male and female proportions are different. Even when female clothes aren't sexualized, they're still cut and sized differently. If moids didn't have that, they'd still be sexualizing and skinwalking our breasts and hips like they already do. If the clothes were enough fuel for the coom: why do they take hrt and get boobjobs?

No. 2358189

>>2358176
>wow look at how ~sexualized~ the average pair of panties look in any department stores
meanwhile male briefs look like shorts, lol. You proved my point, thanks nonny.

No. 2358191

>>2358189
I don't wear boyshort cut panties because they're uncomfortable and I don't have testicles or a big hanging dick. Nice try anon

No. 2358193

>>2358187
I like how you keep bringing up "boring grey robes" because you can't fathom clothing existing without current gendered societal roles imposed on them.

No. 2358194

>>2358187
>tehee these are GURL clothes and they make my pp hard!!
??? but this is literally what they get off to. sissys pre-troonshit used to wear lingerie under their suits and work and cross at home by themselves.

No. 2358197

>>2358191
no1currs

No. 2358198

>>2358193
We get it tiffy, you dress in ugly oversized men's hoodies to hide that you're a hamplanet with self harm scars. The detrans thread is down the hall.

No. 2358199

>>2358194
Can you not fucking read? You're just baiting this anon and being retarded
>>2358187
anon you're being baited by morons and repeating yourself over and over

No. 2358201

>>2358184
I don't like overly sexualized clothes on women either, but pretending like they look just as horrible on women is retarded. Women actually have boobs in that cleavage and not disgusting ape breast hair and a lot of nothingness making it sag. They don't burst out of their seams because the shoulders strain too much, they actually have a waist to accentuate. If something is made to show of specific features and then these features don't exist it will look bad.

No. 2358202

>>2358198
nta but it was a tradthot all along! KEK ofcourse a tradthot would be angry that sexy clothes shouldnt be gendered and men shouldnt show an inch of skin because its gay or some shit.

No. 2358203

>>2358198
Kek nope to any of those, I just study anthropology. I'll let you guess again though if you calm down.

No. 2358205

>>2358193
Men will sexualize women wearing men's clothes, there's me skin walking "butch dykes". The clothes are completely irrelevant, they want to fuck and become the woman underneath, and that means inhibiting her mannerisms including what she wears, even if what she's wears does not flatter his male body like it does hers

No. 2358206

I feel like I've reached a new level of terfdom. Just saw a xitter mutual/friend do his usual handmaidening "trans ppl are valid, gfo if u disagree" and instead of feeling down and annoyed, this time I just couldn't help but laugh. If only he knew that he is secretly friends with terfs! If only he knew that unlike him we're not as hateful as to cut all contact and pretend he's the spawn of satan, but that we're actually capable of being mature adults while interacting with others whose political opinions we disagree with. Yet he thinks we're some evil cartoon boogeyman, so he can't see us because we're just not what he thinks we are. It's like for the first time I truly saw how childish his tantrums really are, now it just feels like watching an angry toddler. I feel so zen!

No. 2358207

>>2358201
They look hideous, sorry nonna but its the truth. You can cope and seethe about ''muh fit'' but the truth is men dont care about it looking right, they care about them showing tits, legs and ass.

No. 2358212

>>2358202
Wheres the tradthot retard. No one said men shouldn't wear skin either, you are literally making up arguments from nowhere cause you have nothing to go off of

No. 2358213

>>2358205
they arent sexualized the clothes themselves retard they are sexualizing lesbians

No. 2358218

>>2358212
NTA but
>No one said men shouldn't wear skin either
Kek this sounds like we're debating gender roles within a cult

No. 2358220

Why the FUCK did I decide to go to college for social services as a detransitioned woman? The pro-troonery is literally making me insane. I can't even say my experience, despite being a "safe space".

No. 2358222

File: 1737486125170.png (932.08 KB, 640x893, IMG_2188.png)

>>2358206
the reason they post that is because they know terfs are cowards like that who hide their beliefs and may be still attempting to cling to good people like a parasite because they’d be alone if they voiced their beliefs. you don’t sound zen.(bait)

No. 2358224

>>2358212
>No one said men shouldn't wear skin either
you literally did you guys even posted fully covered guys in gowns to show men can look ''good'' in dresses, that being they have to be fully covered and be shapeless

No. 2358226

>>2358218
they're literally trad I don't know why they don't go mask off and just say they hate butch women as well, and that women should just wear long milk maid dresses. Clearly they hate the idea of being GNC. Likely a homophobic conservawhore.

No. 2358229

>>2358220
It's so fucking bad in college in general. I was a writing major… you could not go one class without the handmaidens pulling out "muh intersectional reading" on a short story written in fucking 1852

No. 2358230

>>2358212
>men don't care
Yeah no fucking duh men don't care about how they look, that's why an anon took precious time out of her day to try and explain how women set those parameters for men and by relieving them of the responsibility to present themselves as attractive/stylish/wearing clothing that fits, you're helping the worst parts of the patriarchy and being a handmaiden yourself

No. 2358233

>>2358226
its very telling they ONLY have a problem with trashy sexualized clothes when its on men.

No. 2358234

>>2358226
They are not because they are me and I want to see men in dresses, but not tight dresses. You are coping because you can't handle being wrong, you have to imagine I am some conservative Christian milkmaid

No. 2358237

>>2358234
what you posted arent dresses they are long tshirts topkek they are hideous and you have insane shit taste

No. 2358238

>>2358224
literally these deranged aspie liars are acting like they didn't post a slew of ugly shapeless tunics to show how men can wear it "appropriately." Like who fucking cares what fabric they wear, I just want them not to go to DV shelters for women for validation.

No. 2358241

>>2358237
And then man wearing this shit is better? >>2358055
Come on

No. 2358245

>>2358241
yes, because he isnt insecure. Being insecure is the most pussy drying aspect in men.

No. 2358249

>>2358206
idk I've gotten to the point where I just openly shit on TRAs and troons and take the block with dignity knowing they had to read my tweet and seethe about it.

No. 2358250

>>2358234
so you're okay with dresses but not the tight and oversexualized ones? Why are you just microwaving femininity and masculinity "gender roles" but making them slightly woke that's so retarded. They should all be trashed.

No. 2358253

File: 1737486675713.jpg (40.68 KB, 480x476, Djig7ZfVsAAaw0y.jpg)

>>2358201
The only reason people believe this is because form-fitting and revealing clothing has been memetically imposed on women so that they visually fit the feminine gender role under the patriarchy. Men's clothing trends towards the practical while women's clothing is decorative, impractical, and often sexualized. But I want a damn world where men can be decorative for the benefit of women. Saying that moids just naturally don't look good and have nothing about their bodies to accentuate just feeds into the idea that they should be valued for things outside of their looks and that they don't have to try to look nice. Nobody naturally gravitates towards these weird ass cuts of restrictive clothing, it's all made up and enforced through gender roles.

No. 2358255

>>2358245
"They're not insecure" not feeling the need to reveal the goods immediately is not insecure. He shows enough with the arms that you know there is more. You just have no taste and cannot fathom clothes being sexy without clinging to the body like men like to see on women

No. 2358258

>>2358253
See this is fucking sexy not that flower print cardigan garbage

No. 2358260

>>2358229
How did you survive nonna? I have another year, kek

No. 2358261

>>2358253
The vast majority of modern women would find these moids (in male clothing) hot. Anon said moids don't look good in tops meant for women because they don't have breast tissue to fill it out, which is true. None of the moids in your image are wearing female tops, they're wearing clothing cut and fit for a male body which is why it looked good then and now too

No. 2358262

>>2358253
1. This is not crossdressing, you're offtopic
2. These are literally just shirts cut in half to show off abs. Still not comparable to women's crop tops, which are tight and with a cleavage to show off tits.

No. 2358264

>>2358255
>they are not insecure
men literlly think they are gay if they show an inch of skin, it is insecurity. Enjoy your cult gowns all you want but they are not sexy because by definition sexy clothes is about showing skin, not covering it.

No. 2358266

>>2358261
>>2358262
If a man whore that he would be called a woman/faggot nowadays, you are moving the goalpost AGAIN.

No. 2358267

File: 1737487101140.jpg (190.3 KB, 2917x1353, not_found_nudity.jpg)

>>2358264
wtf sexy is not an exact synonym for nudity?? kek this is why so many chubbos are wandering around my city in crop tops and booty shorts, good god

No. 2358271

>>2358176
It's funny because as far as I know, Victoria Secret, as in the original concept, was made as a store for men to buy lingerie for their wives and girlfriends

No. 2358272

>2358264
>clothes being sexy is about showing skin
You're cooked
>>2358266
The goalposts remain because this is a top cut in a way to accentuate a MALE body, not putting a man in a top meant to flatter women. "Muh muh goalposts!!!!" go fuck Harry styles in that dress then

No. 2358273

>>2358267
you know what sexy means, stop shilling your ugly amish garbage. That shit wouldnt be considered sexy on women either because its not showing the body.

No. 2358274

File: 1737487228621.jpeg (96.81 KB, 768x768, VERUGU-Crop-Tops-for-Women-Lon…)

>>2358261
>>2358262
So if you found a top like this at the store, would you call it unisex? Even if it was an XXL? It doesn't show cleavage nor is it tight around the chest. The answer is no, because it's cropped. Nowadays crop tops are considered feminine, but they weren't in the 80s. These things change and are made up. There's no inherent "female clothing" or "male clothing" style because gender roles are social roles based on sex. And these roles differ across time and society.

No. 2358275

>>2358253
This looks ridiculous

No. 2358276

File: 1737487235827.jpg (80.99 KB, 500x711, 44526cd696e9ddf712295566b5f6b2…)

>>2358271
Meanwhile
>Victoria Secret, reality, early 90s

No. 2358279

>>2358274
It would look good on a man and a woman because it is not cut to accentuate tits, its cut to accentuate the mid section which is a good trait on men and women. The whole argument is that a top mean to accentuate tits looks bad on a man

No. 2358281

>>2358272
are you implying that women would look good in the shit harry styles wear? because they wouldnt. Harry styles and the MCR guy are hideous and ugly people dont look good on anything. Its got nothing to do with them being men. They are just too old and hideous to wear anything and look good. If they were women they wouldnt be allowed to have a career and would be considered walled, but they are men.

No. 2358283

>>2358253
I don't know what you are trying to prove here but I never fucking said any of this. I said men look disgusting in clothes that are made for female bodies (and I think chest hair is an assault on my eyes) the clothes in your picrel are fine, I personally like the guy on the right a lot, the crop top perfectly accentuates his body.

No. 2358284

>>2358212
Literally this, I'm ok with men showing skin lmao, I just don't want them to look like AGPs. What's there to not understand? It's not crazy

No. 2358286

>>2358280
>I just don't want them to look like A GPS
literally none of the examples posted here are ''AGP'' its literally just normal female clothes that isnt even sexualized.

No. 2358288

>>2358273
I do, you don't apparently. Better go squeeze into that poly-blend crop top so we never forget your body is covered in skin

No. 2358289

>>2358286
Harry Styles / Gerard Way upthread. Or do you think that's totally valid and not gross at all?

No. 2358291

>>2358266
Your blood pressure is rising so much you're misspelling simple words AGAIN. Calm your tits, goalpost-chan, you need to learn what that means because you haven't used it properly once this entire argument. Come up with something else.

No. 2358292

>>2358107
nta but that's a part of the issue. either men are shamed for dressing feminine or they're yaas kween-d to oblivion by libfems, there's very little middle ground. if the majority response to a moid wearing a dress was "ok", i don't think there'd be as many troons or femboys. a large group of them are attention seeking cluster b faggots so they thrive on these extremes.

a bigger issue that causes this and will continue to cause it however, is the automatic sexualization and objectification of women and anything related to women. short skirts, high heels, sheer tights, crop tops etc. all of these are almost always fetish objects for moids because they're retards who want to fuck the concept of femininity. there are some moids who i've seen dress in more "modest" and desexualized clothes but they still look like fetishists and it's precisely because of what i just said. very very few moids have actually worn feminine fashion and made it look normal on them, and that's primarily because they're actually passionate about fashion itself and don't get sexual gratification from it. it reminds me of that one essay, "there is no unmarked woman", literally all women's clothing is tainted by the fact that it's women's clothing. the only way i can see to solve this is by creating a feminist utopia, which i don't know will ever happen, but the second best would just be to not give these moids any public attention, either positive or negative, online or irl, it'll at least weed out some of the worst ones.

No. 2358293

>>2358281
Shed look better at least since the a line cut would show her figure and the top would cup her bosom. It's not cut at all for a male figure. It's why suits have to be tailored to the specific person, you cannot just shove anyone in any cut and it is the same

No. 2358294

>>2358288
>projecting
its funny how sexy in men to you is fully covered while sexy in women is wearing stuff that shows their ass and tits. Very telling.

No. 2358295

>>2358189
How can you even think those panties are sexy kek to each their own I guess

No. 2358296

>>2358289
Those guys are ugly as fuck they would look ugly even in normal clothes. If you put them in anon's mormon approved dresses they would still look repulsive.

No. 2358297

>>2358276
Nta victoria's secret was made because the male creator admitted he wanted to close the barrier between porn and real life, and made his wife do all the public speaking because he wanted the company to appear "for girls". Who cares that they made loungewear once in the 90s, it's not like the whole store looked like that. I'm not even American and I know this. How come you don't?

No. 2358298

>>2358291
>has no arguments
ok

No. 2358300

File: 1737487733879.jpg (72.22 KB, 576x735, rockwell-freespeech-3343567045…)

if moids want to be fashionable they should just dress in well tailored old timey clothes.

No. 2358302

>>2358276
So in the 80s-90s, clothes were already pretty gender neutral and male gender non conformity was being increasingly normalized. Yet trannies still existed, and only became more and more mainstream over the years. Almost as if you give trannies an inch and they'll take a mile.

No. 2358306

>>2358298
>has had no arguments this whole time other than "YOURE MOVING GOALPOSTS REEEEE"
Nice job, though, you didn't misspell a single word this time!

No. 2358308

>>2358300
This is how the vast majority of normie men dress anon

No. 2358309

>>2358293
>shes look better
lol, no she wont. She would look as trashy. Your mind just accepts sexualized clothes in women but not men. Also, again both gerard way and that 1D fag are HIDEOUS. Any woman that was as ugly as them would look equally bad.

No. 2358310

>>2358300
>fashionable
thats not fashionable thats ugly and boring and they already do that

No. 2358312

>>2358294
Sexy women is not women in anything because i don't find women sexy. I am describing what men tend to find sexy on a woman. I need to break it down for you, men want to see women in tight clothes, that's what they find sexy. I do not want to see men in tight clothes. I want to see men in clothes that frame them. Clothes that make a woman sexy for men do not make the woman sexy for me, clothes that make a man sexy for me do not make them sexy for men, there is a fundamental difference in how to appeal to the sexes. You are so used to seeing tight as sexy because that's what men like that you have adopted the male vision of sex, and cannot fathom the female gaze anymore

No. 2358313

>>2358306
>I know you are but what I am
You're sperging like a moid, incapable of reading or understanding basic ideas and that anon is done with you, retard

No. 2358314

>>2358302
because trannies arent about being GNC, retard. They are literally fetishistic conservatives. Why do you think so many troons are misogynistic. if they didnt think dress and make up is what makes a woman they wouldnt troon out.

No. 2358315

Why is everyone capping for men in dresses today, I thought this was the anti men in dresses thread

No. 2358316

>>2358292
>if the majority response to a moid wearing a dress was "ok", i don't think there'd be as many troons or femboys.
Exactly, but they'd still find other more creative ways to skinwalk us and violate our boundaries. They wouldn't just give up with their microshenises tucked between their legs. Even trannies themselves admit that the coom "euphoria" of crossdressing eventually wears off, and that's why they start hormones and surgeries. They'll always chase after something new the second their current fetish isn't giving them the same dopamine release as before, blaming their behavior on women's reactions is just more misogyny.

No. 2358317

File: 1737488062480.jpg (596.75 KB, 1080x1687, Picsart_25-01-21_14-31-27-979.…)

>>2358297
Damn this is actually kind of fucked up.

No. 2358318

>>2358299
and its funny how they find skin attractive but you find fully covered guys? it seems like a you problem. You must wet yourself going outside and seeing all those guys in tshirts and shirts not showing an inch of skin, so sexy!

No. 2358320

>>2358314
I don't think the average farmer can even differentiate between being GNC and trooning out to be honest.

No. 2358322

>>2358315
We must've gotten crossposted somewhere because a bunch of trannies have been camping out here for the last couple of days. But I can confirm that Chaser-chan who always spergs about how we're unwoke and repressed for not finding her sissy troons attractive is a recurring character ITT and she always does this.

No. 2358323

>>2358317
Lmao what a lil bitch.

No. 2358324

File: 1737488207431.jpg (328.57 KB, 1862x2800, 4a84528217e0d2801d517ce43e70f2…)

>>2358310
>>2358308
retard this image is a meme not an example of fashion

No. 2358325

the fact we are having the argument that only women can wear sexy tight fit clothes is very telling honestly

No. 2358326

>>2358324
Looks like a redditor kek

No. 2358327

>>2358165
>get off to clothing first
No, clothing is a gateway drug but it's really just one aspect of AGP fetishistic fixation.
>>2358136
>if nobody gave a fuck AGPs wouldn't get off the taboo
They would get off to getting surgery, imitating feminine voices and mannerisms, etc. It's endless. Pointing out that clothing is gendered and tight garments meant to flatter the female form don't look as good on men, doesn't create AGP. This "if you point out a problem you create it" accusation is a shit cope TRAs use against us and you've absorbed it. Some of them think pointing out AGPs and their deviant sexuality creates more angry rapey AGPs. Should we stop talking about it then?

No. 2358329

>>2358314
You're literally agreeing with me, aggro sped. Learn some reading comprehension and calm down.

No. 2358330

>>2358316
Men will always see dresses as feminine, and saying "clothes have no genders" will not stop them from assigning genders to clothes. At this point only handmaidens sat that, men aren't going to sexualize women's clothes any less just because someone says that lol. If anything it gives them more ammo because then wearing anything becomes valid.

No. 2358331

File: 1737488322157.jpg (150.9 KB, 736x981, 1000013120.jpg)

>>2358318
Basically yeah because I don't need to adopt the way men like to see woman to sexualize men. This is sexy on men. I guess i need to see him in booty and a plunge neck like a man wants to see a woman, or I'm trad? Fuck off, you are brainwashed

No. 2358332

>>2358327
>and tight garments meant to flatter the female form
they dont flatter the female form, sperg. They SEXUALIZE it.

No. 2358334

>>2358325
The fact that you misconsted the argument to this point is more telling tbh. Men can wear all the tight fitting clothing they want, just not ones made specifically for women's bodies since they look retarded and don't fit.

No. 2358336

>>2358327
If women suddenly all wore baggy t shorts and sweatpants agps would wear them because the clothes are irrelevant, its the woman underneath they are trying to become

No. 2358337

>>2358331
This is slobbish. You're a joke.

No. 2358338

File: 1737488466332.jpg (63.09 KB, 736x1072, bce3d295e97f2178d4033fc2d02f26…)

>>2358326
Fuck off I am tired of seeing moids in their ill fitting ugly modern fashions. Your faggoty remarks are why hot men dress like shit.

No. 2358340

>>2358337
He's hot and I bet you like to see bishes in maid outfits because you are brainwashed into seeing maid outfits the way men see them.

No. 2358346

>>2358338
suit aside this moid is fugly

No. 2358347

>>2358338
He's still hot because the suit flatters him, you only prove my point that men don't need to show skin to be sexy. Skin = sex appeal is male gaze adopted retardation

No. 2358352

>>2358324
What does it being a meme have to do with anything if you say "this is how men should dress" in a discussion about that? Are you completely fucking autistic? I could put up a picrel of the ronald mcdonald and then when people react negatively, say I was joking too

No. 2358353

>>2358340
nonna your "hot moid" looks like a homeless skater boy who stole half his alcoholic dad's closet, i really don't think you have room to talk

No. 2358355

>>2358332
>They SEXUALIZE it.
Oh my god. They sexualize it. Should we call an ambulance? Are you one of these people who doesn't understand the difference between sexuality and objectification? Okay, ornamental over comfortable clothing can be understood as a kind of objectification, but this
>ermagaaaaad it's sexualization
Bullshit is straight out of 2014 tumblr kek

No. 2358356

>>2358326
Kek they wish

No. 2358357

>>2358347
You'd say a potato sack flatters someone if enough people gathered around and agreed that was the case

No. 2358358

>>2358346
Show me an example of a hot moid

No. 2358359

>>2358353
I could fix him…

No. 2358360

This is the funniest infight ever

No. 2358362

>>2358359
please fix yourself instead, don't stoop to that level of slob moid "fashion"

No. 2358363

>>2358360
It's annoying retard shit. This is turning into the ugly man psyop thread. I swear this is the first drawn out, retarded infight in these threads.

No. 2358366

>>2358360
Wonder if the autistic agressive anon calling everyone a "sperg" while she defends our resident troon baiter feels stupid. He/she is laughing about "eggs" between her assmad replies too kekkkk

No. 2358367

>>2358357
The only psyop is you suggesting this >>2358055
is flattering or sexy on a man and if we normalized it men wouldn't skinwalk women anymore

No. 2358369

>>2358367
I didn't post that picture

No. 2358370

>>2358331
Kekkkk I love how that anon tried to act like you were the crazy one for being attracted to men who look and dress like men instead of some Jeffree star fag in fishnets and panties who would never look her way. Sorry you're broken from cooming to BL and gay porn and are only attracted to men who suck cock, but it's normal for women to want masculine men.

No. 2358376

>>2358370
>it's normal for women to want masculine men.
nayrt, but please go away you crunchy tradthot. We're not a website for divine feminine retards like you, go rest in your "feminity" and get financially abused by a moid somewhere else.(infight bait)

No. 2358378

I've never felt aroused or turned on by a male in a maid, schoolgirl, nurse or any of the other things coomers enjoy. Maybe this is because I'm not biologically identical to a male and am not sexually attracted to the same things as he is (something we can see throughout history and all over the world, except in leftoid's fantasy tribes and nomadic agrarian cultures uwu) and this doesn't have to be a controversial debate every single day between a minority brainwashed on tumblr and the rest of the entire world

No. 2358379

>>2358367
learn that there's multiple anons in a thread and stop being retarded

No. 2358380

>>2358055
>>2358038
Reminder: this is what Chaser-chan thinks peak male performance looks like kekkkkkk

No. 2358382

>>2358370
>masculine men
And the picrel is a grown man dressing like a 12 year old going through a rebellious phase

No. 2358383

>>2358038
Jeff the Killer if he trooned out and skinwalked Jane.

No. 2358384

>>2358380
they're not a chaser for acknowledging some men look decent in traditionally feminine clothes. By that rhetoric chaser-chan title also applies to >>2358253 for showcasing men wearing literal whore tier crop tops by today's standards and cooming over it.

No. 2358385

not even a lesbian but i lose more and more faith in hetero and bi women every day. who cares which moid is hotter they should all die. end of story

No. 2358387

>>2358376
Nope, cope, seethe, dilate and go back, tranny-chaser. Not liking faggots in fishnets and being heterosexual doesn't make anyone a tradthot and your sissy bootlicking makes you stick out like a sore thumb. Integrate or go back, sped.

No. 2358388

>>2358387
>how do you do fellow farmers

No. 2358389

>>2358384
We know it's you, girl. Short shirts that show off abs is nowhere near the same as the skeletal fag in lipstick, fishnets and a skirt you posted.

No. 2358392

>>2358388
>"Nonna" seething women aren't into crossdressing men
Smells like ballsack in here…(scrotefoiling)

No. 2358393

>>2358389
kekk that actually isn't, keep being a schizo though and thinking that everyone who disagrees with you is the same anon

No. 2358399

>>2358387
You genuinely sound schizophrenic, telling someone to integrate but literally having a visible panic attack on lolcow. So much for sounding dispassionate.

No. 2358400

>>2358393
Okay a group mf stupid moids invading the gender ideology thread and posting ban evasion memes- did you think no one saw that?
>that wasn't me! i'm a totally different retard who simply agrees with the trannies
Everyone knows this is where idiot scrotes who have "hypnotized" themselves into becoming troons, believe they can do the same to women by meming fags in dresses (but can't because women don't want moids in dresses and never will)?

No. 2358403

>>2358387
Someone’s a tranny chaser for saying gender specific clothing is dumb and leads to troonism…what happened to lolcow. Seriously where did these newfags come from. You’re not supposed to defend “men’s masculinity” on this website moron.

No. 2358410

>>2358387
the majority of masculine moids are insecure, violent, ugly misogynistic retards and the majority of feminine moids are attention seeking, manipulative, ugly misogynistic sex pests. there is no right answer when it comes to this. calm the fuck down trad-chan.

No. 2358411

>>2358410
KEK at trad-chan. A new one created

No. 2358421

>>2358411
You're the retard from the tradhots thread in snow who gets everyone banned for infighting with you because you say stupid shit all the time

No. 2358423

>>2358400
Genuinely how mentally unwell do you have to be to not realize that there’s multiple users on this website and come from different sects of gender critical belief. Some of the users you think are “mf stupid moids defending tranny’s!” are actually just classical radfems who are trying to separate gendered clothing from sex so that it prevents troonism.
I can tell you’re a newfag by your typing style and by the way you couldn’t tell that it’s other women who disagree with you, who disagree with oppressive and rigid gender structures. Not a fucking “4chan brigade of moids or tranny’s or chasers.”
integrate, now.

No. 2358426

>>2358300
KEK at the people replying who think you're saying moids should dress like the dude in your pic instead of realizing that pic is a meme

No. 2358427

>>2358421
Ayrt, and wrong anon. I’m never on that thread. I was just laughing at the new name because it’s fitting for that other retarded nonna’s obsession with masculinity.

No. 2358429

>>2358366
that's not me kek I just came here now

No. 2358434

>>2358426
if it is it’s a horrible meme. It’s not a dress so it shouldn’t make anyone seethe, and it’s not very masculine so it’s not a good paragon for masculinity. So in both arguments it’d be a horrible pic.

No. 2358436

>are actually just classical radfems who are trying to separate gendered clothing from sex so that it prevents troonism
Where are those radfems? Because this thread is full of stupid moids who can't read and enjoy wasting women's time by having the same basic ideas explained to them over and over
>I can tell you’re a newfag by your typing style
I can tell you're a tranny by the way you're defending trannies, maybe I'm correct - maybe you are. We'll never know because it's an anonymous image board and I can say w/e the fuck I want anon (until the tranny reports begin)(scrotefoiling)

No. 2358442

>>2358436
take your meds

No. 2358444

>>2358442
>copy/pasted from the Tradthot thread on Snow
Yep it's the retard tranny who everyone hates and complains about on meta

No. 2358448

>>2358436
Your scrotefoiling is incredibly annoying. Please shut up. Also kek at you not denying you’re a newfag. This is why you guys should shut up and lurk moar instead of jumping in arguments and offering your opinion. If you integrated yourself you’d have seen these takes before instead of blindly assuming there’s a moid brigade happening.
You’re like the dumb anons that report lesbians as scrotes on here. There’s a culture here, everything that isn’t “ugh I love men! I love pink! Ow tranny’s are so super jealous of me because of my feminine wombanlyness” Isn’t indicative of there being moids.

Genuinely, I mean this from the bottom of my heart. Go back.

No. 2358449

File: 1737490979393.mp4 (72.42 KB, 144x144, images (2).mp4)

terf civil war

No. 2358452

>>2358448
I didn't deny anything, I called you a retard tranny. Do I need to repeat myself? Go away(scrotefoiling, infighting)

No. 2358453

>>2358423
The one posting the tunics is me and I am not new, I've used this site for 5 years. I also don't think you are trannies, just retarded handmaidens that think gender neutral clothing will stop a man from getting surgury and dressing like his skinwalk target. The clothes are meaningless, they are just cut to flatter certain body types, and let's be real one of those body types is exclusive to women. You removing the "womens" clothes modifier will not affect the reality of who's body they are meant for.

No. 2358454

>>2358444
i've never posted on the tradthots thread. again, please take your meds

No. 2358455

so we really are having a hours long infight about whether pants are for boys and dresses are for girls or not, in a gc anti gender ideology feminist thread?

>>2358320
is right

No. 2358456

>>2358434
the usage of the meme has nothing to do with how the guy looks or is dressed. It tends to be used when you post an opinion in the middle of other discussions, and your opinion is kinda generic but you're saying it like it's revolutionary, but you're aware so you're kinda making fun of yourself. Imagine Nona stood up in a room full of arguing nonas and said her comment ("i think moids should wear
well tailored old timey clothes").

No. 2358457

File: 1737491131109.webp (13.9 KB, 778x682, which-surprised-pikachu-is-bes…)

>>2358454
>tranny lie
See picrel

(shouldn't you be busy reporting me from your different vpn locations and multiple devices or is it coom time again already?)

No. 2358458

>>2358436
I’m a classical radical feminist. Gendered clothing oppresses women, and the only logical conclusion to the idea that “men shouldn’t ever wear feminine things,” is the idea that “women shouldn’t ever wear feminine things.” Which I disagree with because I support gnc women and butch women. Contemporary female clothing designs are hyper-sexualized and demeaning

No. 2358460

>>2358455
KEK exactly, this is genuinely getting sad

No. 2358463

>>2358457
Tinfoiling

No. 2358467

>>2358463
Go nuts, you're the only one who feels like ripping their testicles apart after a ban

No. 2358469

>>2358456
I’m not talking about the standing up meme you retard, I’m talking about the skater boy outfit being used as a meme. Imagine explaining one of the most popular memes to someone on lolcow like they’re some geriatric who can’t use the internet.

No. 2358471

>>2358458
I kind of agree with you on this one, I hate womens clothes. I don't want to show my tits or ass, but that will not stop companies from selling clothes to women who want to for reasons that appeal to men. If we all wore is curently men's clothes and got rid of female clothes altogether that would be based but it's not possible

No. 2358473

>>2358455
no way i came back to almost 400 new posts in here and its still about the same fucking thing
edit: i was browsing on phone a few hours ago so probably closer to 200 but still. shut up

No. 2358474

>>2358455
Kek that’s what I’m saying. I’m sick of normie women brigading this thread and getting upset with people saying they don’t believe in rigid gender roles and gender ideology entirely. There’s only thing that’s real and can’t be change is sex.

No. 2358475

>>2358467
Wrong anon again. Try again.

No. 2358476

>>2358474
Finally some sense ITT

No. 2358479

>>2358475
If you're replying, you're the same anon to me. If it's so important to you to differentiate yourself and personalityfag, type "nta" anon first

No. 2358481

>>2358457
Why are you so afraid of being reported? You can only receive a ban if you actually did something against the rules. This isn’t tiktok, someone can’t mass report you into a ban. Please integrate, you sound ESL.

No. 2358483

masculinity=man femininity=woman gender≠sex I hope it helps ^^(don't use emojis/ emoticons)

No. 2358485

>>2358479
No you retard, I’m the same anon you’ve been replying to for the past 3 replies but not the same anon as whatever dumb anecdotal tranny trauma you experienced in another thread. So like I said, stop tinfoiling and accusing anons of being people they aren’t since you’re too mentally delayed to tell apart typing styles.(infighting)

No. 2358490

>>2358483
Wrong. Masculinity and femininity are both made up. Sex is the only real thing.
Go back and shut up.

No. 2358491

sigh… i don't like when we fight nonnas…

No. 2358493

>>2358490
>masculinity and femininity fo not exist!
So you agree gender is fluid?

No. 2358496

>>2358483
Also cringe “hope this helps” I hate annoying zoomerfags. They lifted the TikTok ban so go back there.

No. 2358499

At this point it's obviously bait so report and ignore

No. 2358500

>>2358469
you replied to the wrong post so i'm the retard? are you sure, grandpa? let's get you to bed before you shit yourself again(infighting)

No. 2358501

>>2358483 not this retard again she's been going on with this for months in different threads

that's not what feminine and masculine mean

No. 2358503

>>2358485
Report me faggot, anons have tried for literal hours to explain the same fucking concepts, to the moid-brained retards over and over. The only reason it triggers you so much is because it's true. Do you know how I feel when someone calls me a moid/MRA? I feel nothing because it never happens, except when an obvious tranny does it anonymously because I don't agree with his stupid opinion(infighting)

No. 2358513

>>2358499
if even newfags can do it, why can't these retards? it's obviously the same tif or group of retards baiting

No. 2358518

>>2358493
No because gender isn’t real.

No. 2358523

File: 1737492592508.png (787.94 KB, 960x960, 1737296147802.png)

Why do they always put themselves at the forefront? Maybe they should push it away instead of letting it fall on top of everything else.

No. 2358524

File: 1737492604309.jpg (47.08 KB, 680x680, Ew0bLziVIAcOvN9(1).jpg)

when will jannies get rid of the tif once and for all(derailing)

No. 2358527

i want to download more yuri but i need to sign to facebook for that, but i don't simply want to create a facebook account for yuri, it would ber social suicide(off-topic)

No. 2358532

>>2358527
What the fuck kind of yuri you consume that you can only find in Facebook of all places?

No. 2358533

>>2358523
kek did you get this from that faggots bluesky

No. 2358534

File: 1737492896335.png (5.54 KB, 1280x815, progressprideflag-danielquasar…)

>>2358523
I still hate the fact that this is the "socially acceptable" pride flag to use. They have to be front and center on everything. It's literally encroaching on the actual rainbow flag

No. 2358537

>>2358523
they always have to piggyback off of actual civil rights movements because theirs is a farce, fucking kek

No. 2358539

>>2358524
I'm sure she will soon get back to flicking her bean to yaoi in a totally non fetishistic way, crying on reddit how agps raping someone is ackshually the terfes fault or getting a stroke from t or whatever hobbies tifs usually have.(derailing)

No. 2358541

So glad the farmhands banned the anons who were accusing people of being scrotes, trannies and defending traditional gender ideology and roles. They completely derailed the thread. This is a feminist thread, leave the normie bullshit at home.

No. 2358544

File: 1737493144327.jpg (47.56 KB, 735x775, bb819fb0e5fc5d9cc103babfef8f7d…)

Why would I care about men, even if they're GNC and not troons? I only care about GNC women. Why would we owe men anything? They can wear a dress but people can judge them all they want too
>>2358518
Gender is not real but they make clothes based on sexual dysmorphism differences between men and women (aka biological differences), what is there to not understand
>>2358523
Kek I actually like the idea of them pushing the troon movement away, it's a nice way to read this image

No. 2358545

>>2358541
Oh my god shut the fuck up

No. 2358549

>>2358544
nyart but how is biological differences gender? How is fashion gender?

No. 2358556

File: 1737493442622.png (371.33 KB, 1500x1013, What-the-colors-of-the-new-pri…)

>>2358534
That's the outdated one, this is the new one that includes intersex people (they now share almost a third of the space even though only roughly 1% of the population is intersex)

No. 2358563

>>2358556
>original pride flag: ideals that can apply to every human being on the planet, because gay people are just like straight people at the end of the day.
>"progress" pride flag additions: only apply to a specified group of people, because they're sPeShUl and oPpReSsEd and therefore separated from the universal human qualities of the original pride flag.
they're really telling on themselves with this

No. 2358567

File: 1737493814644.jpg (15.08 KB, 372x363, df2da37278e0270d873015fb5613e5…)

>>2358556
What the fuck does a genetic disorder have to do with gay marriage, Jesus Christ

No. 2358568

>>2358549
Please learn to read, it says that gender is not real, and that clothes are made based on sexual dysmorphism aka biology. The paragraph doesn't say that biological differences are gender. It stars with "gender is not real" and ends with "biology". I'm not going to spoonfeed you further, use your brain please nonny dearest

No. 2358570

>>2358556
This flag is so fucking ugly

No. 2358576

I'm lurking a debate on soc media between a terf and a troon, and the terf has so many amazing points but then she keeps bringing God, Jesus, and "sin" into it every other post. Which in my mind takes so much away from her good points and makes her seem unhinged. Maybe I'm just being overly critical and also a coward.

No. 2358582

>>2358567
I feel bad for people with DSDs. They have said multiple times that they don't want to be part of this and that their conditions are unrelated to troons.

No. 2358591

>>2358568
so it's gender? because clothes are a social construct too

No. 2358596

>>2352450
KEKKKK NONA

No. 2358597

>>2358576
Sad that even a christcucked pickme has more rational arguments than your average gendie

No. 2358599

>>2358591
>clothes are a social construct too
Pretty sure clothes are fabric to protect us from the elements.

No. 2358601

>>2358582
It’s especially dumb since much of what they advocate against is unnecessary medical procedures and treatment of minors who cannot fully consent. Which is exactly what TRAs want.

No. 2358602

>>2358556
I hate that black and brown people are lumped in with trannies. What in the racist fuck

No. 2358605

>>2358599
kek yeah that's why dress code exists retard

No. 2358623

>>2358591
>>2358605
NTA but clothes are real, fashion is a social construct, and dress codes are a byproduct of fashion. Please go be a derailing retard somewhere else.

No. 2358626

File: 1737495123309.jpg (35.55 KB, 701x438, images-1.jpg)

>>2358599
>>2358605
>>2358591
Let's all just go back to wearing drapes and animal skin all over our bodies. Maybe that's the only way to defeat trannyism.

No. 2358629

>>2358591
you're so dense on purpose kek I can't even be mad at you

No. 2358634

>>2358626
Not any ayrt, and yea. A little more covering though because that shit seemed pretty tattered and everyones poontangs and boynunus were sticking out. no one wants to see that. Do you think there were AGP cavemen? TIMs?

No. 2358635

Gendered fashion is based on gender constructs. Which aren’t real.
Clothing proportions are based on sexual dimorphism and biology. So there’s nothing wrong with scrotes wearing dresses, and women wearing men’s fashion, because that’s just gendered fashion, it’s a social construct not a biological determinant.
But flattering measurement of any clothing is loosely based on group measurements, which reflect human biology.

Can the two retards stop fighting now.

No. 2358642

File: 1737495611553.jpg (130.92 KB, 570x866, kingrogercoronationtunic.jpg)

>>2358626
Unironically yes please. Go back far enough in history and most fashion is at least partway unisex. Anons posted tunics earlier and those are a great example because both men and women wore tunics, the main sex differentiator back then was length (men only had tunics past the knee if they were clergy or rich asf. picrel is a king's coronation tunic which would have gone to the ankles or floor)

No. 2358652

>>2358634
samefag, i just looked up poontang, and i always just thought it was a stupid way to say vagina!! i will never use that again!! i’m so evil.

No. 2358656

>>2358652
it's okay nonna, I could tell you were just trying to be silly. You're good.

No. 2358674

>>2358652
I looked it up but wait poontang isn't another way to say vagina?

No. 2358677

>>2358674
ayrt and i still think it is but it always made me feel weird saying it… maybe because i only ever heard it in vietnam war movies…

No. 2358718

File: 1737498721498.jpg (238.04 KB, 1024x1024, a4dd0e5c5d825831489d5d572c6f6a…)

Clothes have no gender this is why picrel is so hecckin valid, he's just wearing a non gendered outfit, this is natural to him, what do you mean he shouldn't wear a pink skirt ?? Pink skirts are obviously genderless and anyone can wear them, you bigot. Let's not judge him too harsh nonnas, clothes are a societal construct after all. He's such a GNC king, maybe if we all validate his feelings while wearing a dress he won't troon out too much. What do you mean he won't accept himself as a man? But I just reblogged 4 different quotes about clothes having no gender on my tumblr, do you think maybe… do you think maybe he thinks this is a fetish?

No. 2358725

File: 1737499236321.jpg (47.48 KB, 452x678, 1000026863.jpg)

>>2358642
Even now many local outfits from different countries have unisex vibes. Desi nonnies will recognize how panjabi/kurti for men and women can look similar but with different fits to account for body shape differences between male and female.

No. 2358729

>>2358222
>the reason they post that is because they know terfs are cowards like that who hide their beliefs
That's not even true, they post it to signal to other woke people that they have The Correct Opinion, they're all in an echo-chamber telling each other how good and woke they are, and how yucky and bad the evil enemy is.
Just because people are terfs/gender critical doesn't mean they're social media warriors or advocates, like that twitter guy clearly is for troons. And most of us know that you simply cannot talk to people in a cult. We know they won't change their minds, and that they get off on the thought of yelling rape threats directly at a terf. It's a literal waste of time to engage at all. We win nothing by going "actually trans women are NOT women" to these people, they're not gonna go "omg you're so right", they're not gonna engage with an open mind and hear you out. All that will happen is that they throw yet another tantrum. So we screencap and show our friends and laugh at them behind their backs, which IS very zen!

No. 2358740

File: 1737500294043.jpg (589.36 KB, 1220x2087, Screenshot_2025-01-21-19-54-49…)

>Hire a tra-
Fuck no. If I want to hire someone is because I like the art, not because I have to save a trans artist.

No. 2358748

File: 1737500921159.jpg (353.39 KB, 1164x1132, bafkreiddrnv4zy3dvx5gd3uvolfat…)

A bunch of worthless retards they all are.they all sound sane and compassionate,definitely!

No. 2358750

>>2358556
1% of the population does not have a DSD, it's more like 0.02% iirc. I hate the word "intersex", implying that there are sex classes besides male or female.

No. 2358752

>>2358740
The issue is most trans artists suck shit at art because they have to make everything they draw about their trans identity.

No. 2358753

Anons need to understand that it doesnt matter if something makes your pussy wet or not, men shouldnt feel ''emasculated'' for wearing a skirt, and sexualized clothes shouldn't be segregated by gender. You dont like men dressing a certain way? fine, it's your opinion. But segregating sexy clothes by gender only encourages GNC women, GNC men and fetishistic AGPs who get off to being ''humilliated'' by wearing ''female'' clothes to troon out. It's actually pretty common for GNC HSTS gay men to troon out because they have an unsupportive conservative family that doesn't approve of them dressing feminine. Vid rel is a GNC gay man and he talks a lot about it on his channel.

No. 2358762

>>2358753
you're the only sane nonna in this thread. Genuinely thank you, the rest of them are committed to screeching at troonism but aren't actually trying to understand why it's happening or trying to strategize ways to prevent it from happening more.

Jk rowling literally said she hated how gender oppressed women, and these neoconservative handmaidens want to force little girls in sexualized women's clothes because its the "correct" gendered clothing for them. They'll inspire girls to troon out to escape the trap of forced femininity, instead of dismantling gendered fashion aesthetics. A haircut and masculine clothing at a young age would've prevented so many TIF's. They just wanted to be comfortable but according to those anons, no "that's for boys."

No. 2358767

>>2358725
this is literally what we mean when we say clothes have no gender, but the other anons want to infight about that because it doesn't make their pussy steam up.

No. 2358774

>>2358762
The problem with some anons is that they think the worlds revolves around them(and they are also probably underage), and think them liking men in certain fashion means everyone else who likes men in non conventional fashion is a moid tranny handmaide who's wrong!!11!. They dont understand that, in a less conservative world, they would be able to enjoy their suited up whores while other women would be able to enjoy their whore whores because men wouldnt be restricted to wearing ''men's clothes''. Men who wear skirts wouldnt be allowed into the female bathrooms because clothes wouldn't have genders and a skirt does not a woman make. I dont know why anons ALWAYS turn everything into a femcoomer civil war. Its honestly hilarious.

No. 2358778

>>2358774
kek, literally this. I can't believe I watched anons I agreed with get accused of being tranny chasers just because they don't agree with people not being allowed to be gender non-conforming. And you're right, I suspect some of them are underaged. They sounded like they were typing furiously during recess instead of engaging with other nonna's arguments intelligently.

No. 2358792

>>2358778
It was honestly pretty funny to see anons claim oversized XXXXL tshirts for fatties are actually sexy in men NGL. I love coomer infights on lolcor because anons never realize that women can have different taste in men and that we arent a hivemind. Literally 90% of infights on this shithole would cease if anons learned women arent a hivemind and have different opinions and thats fine.

No. 2358795

>>2358774
Stop trying to "recap the infight". That is not what fucking happened and you're an autistic retard for not moving on. Shut up about it and change the fucking topic, how many times do jannies have to come here and clean up the thread because you're so shocked that some women think moids pretend to be handmaidens or idiotic radfems anonymously on the internet? Do you not have anything else going on in your brain?(infighting)

No. 2358801

>>2358795
Calm down, why are you so angry? I just got here. Men have always been pro gendered clothings because, at the end, it only benefits them(men wear comfortable clothes, women wear uncomfortable sexy clothes). Clothes having no gender is like the most basic radfem argument, i dont know why it makes some anons that mad. Your men in suits arent going anywhere.

No. 2358809

>>2358774
>reducing women's opinions to what they find hot or not
sigh. i don't want to see men in dresses. it doesn't matter if it's hot or not. males need to stop wearing clothes from the girl's section when they don't fit said clothes. it's not about being GNC, attractive, or ugly, but the thread got derailed towards that direction. men stop wearing agp clothes, that was the point. it's like none of you is listening to what it is being said.

No. 2358810

>>2358801
kek, watching someone sperg about radical feminist doctrine on a website with radical feminist history is…comedy. Liberal feminist reddit is down the hall for the anons who can't seem to integrate into the board's culture/beliefs. They can find "Boy wear pant and girl wear dress" rhetoric anywhere that isn't lolcor.

No. 2358812

>>2358556
Kek I love how the original rainbow has the meanings of positive values and then the new ugly stripes are as literal and braindead as you can get. In one second you go from love and spirit to TRANNIES they’re incapable of not being self centered and creatively bankrupt fucking hell.

No. 2358813

>>2358801
>why are you so angry?
nta there was trolling and baiting earlier but the jannies cleaned up most of it

No. 2358814

>>2358809
>i don't want to see men in dresses
The world doesnt revolve around you. I find most popular fashion repugnant but that doesnt mean i want to strip away the right of women to buy coquette/goth/egirl aliexpress crap and wear it. Again, its not about your opinion and what offends you.

No. 2358815

>>2358809
who actually cares? We're talking about troonism not just males wearing a dress. There's always facebook you know.

No. 2358819

>>2358814
agreed nonna.

No. 2358820

>>2358817
How is terf a contradiction when it means radical feminism that excludes trannies (men)? Terf doesnt have to go with LGB

No. 2358821

>>2358815
and I was talking about troonism, not GNC men. if you want to defend men wearing clothes made for little girls so badly, there's also a million websites out there starting with reddit and xitter.

No. 2358822

>>2358817
The T wasnt implemented until the 90s, 20 years after stonewall.

No. 2358823

>>2358821
Absolutely no one is defending any adult wearing little girls clothes. You need to take your meds.

No. 2358824

>>2358821
It progressed to defending rigid gender roles. Which is anti-radical feminist. No one cares how you feel about that.

No. 2358832

>>2358827
Women (female) rights

No. 2358833

>>2358817
Terf wasn’t a term chosen by the “terfs” it was a term created by trannies to denigrate any person, especially female, critical of gender ideology (or, in application any woman who doesn’t want to suck their cheesy estrogen atrophied dick)

Radical feminism de facto includes tifs because they’re women and excludes Tims because they’re men, it’s not “trans exclusive” it’s male exclusive. It also includes straight lesbian and bisexual women equally because its focus is women’s liberation from a patriarchal system/men.

I’m not even a radfem but it’s staggering what some people think “terfs” are. What are you talking about

No. 2358834

>>2358792
>anons claim oversized XXXXL tshirts for fatties are actually sexy in men NGL.
KEK, this actually got me to chuckle. Never change lolcor, never change.

No. 2358836

>>2358774
>They dont understand that, in a less conservative world, they would be able to enjoy their suited up whores while other women would be able to enjoy their whore whores because men wouldnt be restricted to wearing ''men's clothes''.
Except that's not happening anytime soon, as long as men are gross deranged perverts in positions of power, and as long as they want to keep said power over women, stuff like AGP will always exist. It doesn't matter how much you yell "clothes have no gender" into the void, the truth is men in positions of power don't care and won't change their minds about it. The problem is men. That's why I don't want to coddle them. Even when GNC they're still men, even when wearing a dress they will still be violent and misogynist because that's what men are.

No. 2358840

>>2358829
What.

No. 2358841

>>2358523
>gay rights
trannies hate homosexuality and anything that has to do with same sex attraction. they call gays and lesbians genital fetishists and don't like it when bisexuals talk about wanting to fuck the same sex over a tranny.
>freedom of expression
unless they deem it transphobic then they silence you
>women's rights
they hate real women and always put an end to any discussion that has to do with the biological reality of being female. they call women terfs just for us talking about our periods.
>free love
"you aren't allowed to reject trans people while dating otherwise you're transphobic and also a racist"
>free speech
jk rowling did that and look what it got her kek
>democracy
they don't even let lesbians date biological women without calling her a terf
>freedom of religion
unless it's the religion of worshiping trannies
>modernity
they think they are modern for pushing extreme gender roles on everyone while claiming to be above gender roles pushed by the right. lol, lmao even.
>literacy
trannies can't, don't, and won't read, they'll just scream transphobia. also they love to ban books and any written words that they feel is even slightly gender critical.

ironically, by getting rid of trans rights, all other rights will become safe again.

No. 2358847

>>2358836
Then there is not point to even trying or criticizing anything anymore since nothing is going to improve anyways. Sounds like defeatist attitude that doesnt challenges troons dumb gender conforming ideologies.

No. 2358852

>>2358836
okay, but unless you're planning to castrate men en masse to prevent them from secretly fetishizing being a female, one ACTUAL way of preventing a type of troonism from occurring is to take away the taboo-ness from wearing women's clothes. Thus killing the excitement of the sissification kink as a result. We can come up with strategies for the other reasons the fetish manifests later, but alot of it starts at fashion and aesthetic repression. Clearly that repression shit conservatives tried has failed, and unless you're in a literal fascist state, there will be a moid somewhere ordering an amazon skirt. It's more feasible to make it illegal to swap genders, than it is to trace their credit card purchases in case they buy a pink top or call the police when they post themselves wearing a blouse.

No. 2358855

>>2358854
that's not what was said and you know it. Stop being disingenuous.

No. 2358856

>>2358854
Is it not just "clothes have no gender" whereas the second half of your sentence is the conclusion to the statement? Clothes don't have an intrinsic gender, as gender is not intrinsic.

No. 2358874

>>2358856
This. Gender is not real. If clothes "have an intrinsic gender," then submissive behavior has an intrinsic gender, dominance has an intrinsic gender, intellectual aptitude has an intrinsic gender, hobby preferences have an intrinsic gender, careers have an intrinsic gender, and so on. If anons don't want moids to argue that women who aren't behaving meekly and submissively are "acting outside of their intrinsic gender," then you can't argue that males are behaving outside of their "intrinsic gender" because they're wearing a dress. Just because you like wearing a dress, and hate when moids wear a dress doesn't mean gender roles still don't harm women more than it harms moids.
Kek they want every privilege they enjoy in society nowadays to be gender neutral except for the clothes, literally unserious. Get rid of all of it, and lower the amount of troons, simple.

No. 2358875

>>2358847
>criticizing anything
AYRT is being critical, learn to read
>>2358753
>GNC men and fetishistic AGPs who get off to being ''humilliated'' by wearing ''female'' clothes to troon out
Handmaidens gave plenty of support to troons and "GNC" (as if clothes had any weight when it comes to actual nonconformity), it did nothing but embolden them. I need you to understand describing a state of affairs doesn't perpetuate it, in our current cultural context, in a society saturated by misogyny and fetish porn, no amount of 'it's okay to wear dresses boys!' will reduce AGP. The best thing that can happen is men's fashion expanding organically, like how pink is now a normal color for men after decades of taboo. But simply stating something doesn't change reality.
>>2358852
>but alot of it starts at fashion and aesthetic repression
No. If you studied paraphilias you know it's not as simple as shame=fetish. It's just not. Men don't develop fetishes because something is repressed on an aesthetic level. Men develop fetishes as substitute for genitalia and to deal with certain anxieties that are specific to males' psychological development. A fetish stands between them and that anxiety and gives them more pleasure than regular sex, hence why they get addicted to it, in a sense. If tomorrow we put pictures of women's feet on billboards to counter the shame associated with a foot fetish, it would just serve as wank material for foot fetishists. We can't make it illegal for moids to wear dresses and it'd be pointless anyways, but we don't have to pretend we can solve fetish with empty nice affirmations. You're very naive about male sexuality, fetish isn't a fun little practice men do to spice up their sex life, it's not a quirky fantasy, it doesn't go away if you take the taboo factor. Fetish is an extremely powerful drive and removing the taboo will be received as encouragement (in our current context). It's unbelievable this has to be explained on the Gender Ideology Hate Thread of all places.

No. 2358877

>>2358861
Ayrt, and do you have research to back up your last point? I'm interested in reading it if you do.

No. 2358886

>>2358875
Nevermind I just re-read what you wrote and find it contradictory. You said that "A fetish stands between them and that anxiety," but the object of their anxiety is often-times wearing feminine clothing because of how taboo it is for males to embody femininity in any way. If not being able to wear feminine clothing is a source of anxiety for men nowadays, then normalizing males wearing feminine clothing would reduce that anxiety. Therefore, reducing the fetish for it. Are you attempting to make the argument that wearing feminine clothing is not a fetish for men at all? How do you explain sissification fantasies?

No. 2358887

>>2358875
>Handmaidens gave plenty of support to troons and "GNC"
You cant be pro GNC and pro troon, they are literally opposite ideologies.

No. 2358891

>>2358887
This. I'm tired of arguing basic ideological tenets. You can argue that being pro-GNC won't get rid of all the troons but you can never make the argument that they're on the same team, they're diametrically opposite to one another.

No. 2358896

>>2358887
Most handmaids are both pro-gnc and pro-troon because they don't think deeply about both of these things and how they counter eachother. They see ads and little pieces of twitter artwork saying that supporting them is the kind, accepting thing to do, and their sight doesn't go far beyond that.

No. 2358902

>>2358877
Assuming you're replying to my (deleted and edited) post, there are tons of studies by the likes of Blanchard on fetish. Starting with him is a good idea, it's very obvious when you read his findings that fetishistic sexuality is quite different from the rose-colored view of women: if i remove the shame he'll feel better and won't do the weird thing anymore. There are more conceptual explanations of fetish in various psychological traditions, i'll try and find book titles if you're interested.
>>2358886
>the object of their anxiety is often-times wearing feminine clothing
No it's not. Re-read what i said, it's not as simple as "man afraid of something, develop fetish". This makes more sense for traumatized women with masochistic tendencies. Are foot fetishists afraid of feet? Are sadists afraid of violence? No, they're not, that's actually what they enjoy. Feminine gay men do not develop a fetish for wearing feminine clothes even if they suffer much more from rejection than straight boys growing up. How do you explain this? How do you explain that a lot of AGP aesthetics revolve around childhood and "regressing" to a younger age? Is this because they're afraid of children and childish clothing, or because they are developmentally arrested when it comes to sex? (Essentially what a fetish is)
The anxiety i'm referring to is hard to explain in layman terms but it has to do with how men form their identity and the challenges associated with it, not the fear of femininity in particular. It's more to do with development and less to do with adult cultural trends. A way to cope with these anxieties is by picking a sexual object (literal or abstract like 'sissification') to obsess over, rather than have a relationship with a human and what it entails.
>>2358887
I meant GNC men, and i put it in scare quotes because people think being GNC amounts to wearing pink or blue when it's deeper than that. A feminine gay man still comes across as feminine in masculine clothing. He's more GNC (in a real sense) than a straight man wearing a skirt for the shock factor.
>>2358891
No one made this argument.

No. 2358906

>>2358902
>He's more GNC (in a real sense) than a straight man wearing a skirt for the shock factor.
are you talking about faggot speak? because faggot speak is the least GNC thing about gay feminine men. Women wear skirts all the time, but women do not act in the cartoonishly ''feminine'' ways faggots like james charles do.

No. 2358914

>>2358906
I mean gay voice, mannerisms, things they can't control. There is an exaggeration that happens and that's fake, but it exists on top of a real baseline. I find it suspicious that you think effeminate gay men who've been like this early childhood are less GNC than straight men in skirts, because they are less good at imitating women. It's not about imitating women's habits, it's that they are way outside the norm for men. A straight man with typical low range voice, masculine behavior and mannerisms is not GNC, no matter what he wears. Same with women and hyper girly TiFs who wear binders but radiate femininity, like they'll be in the 10% most feminine women in every way but clothing.

No. 2358916

>>2358844
In english, mr peterson?

No. 2358921

>>2358914
>I mean gay voice, mannerisms, things they can't control.
they can control it they arent born with fag voice. Literally no woman who isnt a faghag talks like that. Its not GNC because its specifically a gay-male thing, its not seen in women.

No. 2358933

>>2358921
No one is born with any kind of voice kek.
>it's not GNC because it's not seen in women
Last i checked GNC doesn't simply mean 'like the other sex'. Women can be GNC without imitating manly men, simply by being un-feminine. Call me a faghag all you want (i'm anything but), but wearing a skirt isn't GNC in and of itself. AGPs aren't GNC when they wear thigh highs or typical feminine clothing, and most men who are comfortable with crossdressing in public regularly are AGP.
This is interesting because it's a litmus test for whether you think gender norms are deeply ingrained (to the point where it affects your voice, gait, behavior in a myriad of ways) or simply a matter of clothing. Thinking it's just clothing is what got us in this mess to begin with.

No. 2358944

>>2358933
Gender is socialized, its not something you are born with. Gay men dont talk like fags when they are 5yo, they develop that annoying fagccent because they interact with other fags and its part of their culture, like how fast paced adhd rawr ecksdee annoying voice was popular with the scene kids.

No. 2358956

>>2358944
>Gay men dont talk like fags when they are 5yo
maybe not all of them but it happens. there are some incredibly faggy acting little boys out there

No. 2358975

>>2358956
those kids normally have faghag moms like that dezmon kid whose mom was a huge faghag into drag queens and gay culture

No. 2358989

>>2358944
Ah yes, 5yos aren't socialized. You'd be surprised by how fast kids are socialised, a lot happens between ages 0-3. 5yo is the age you start having silly childish crushes, do you think being GNC wouldn't already be apparent? They often make it extreme and stereotypical as they encounter gay culture but not always
>>2358975
Nah there really are faggy boys and tomboys in conservative families. Crazy i know.

No. 2358993

>>2358989
being GNC has nothing to do with being gay anyways

No. 2359000

>>2358993
sometimes I wonder how many fags aren't actually fags but were just effeminate straight boys who were bullied/abused into being gay?

No. 2359001

>>2358993
It kind of does. But you're right, straight people can be GNC and often are. Manly straight women who were ex-tomboys and still don't care to act femininely are GNC, sensitive men who aren't ultra agressive and have high emotional intelligence are GNC, even if they wear normie clothing. They are more GNC than hulking exmilitary hons and girly TiFs in miku hatsune binders.

No. 2359007

>>2359001
fun fact most gay men prefeer masculine men, feminine gays actually struggle to find partners and straight up crossdressers only get hit on by bi men and tranny chasers

No. 2359033

File: 1737511896536.jpg (1.14 MB, 1074x4044, 1000003282.jpg)

Can someone fluent and up to date with gendie speak tell me what am i not understanding despite being so close

No. 2359039

All of these infights when trannies are shit, TIFs need to stop being coddled for their poor decisions and mental illness and “radfems” all need to be called out as fake feminists

No. 2359048

>>2359033
He's just talking shite to separate gender and sex to validate trannies. We know gender and sex is different and women don't have to follow fashion rules. Trannies meanwhile do have to enforce retarded gender norms while also trying to validate being equal to the female sex on the foundation of gender a social construct and not an indisputable fact. So women are transphobes for not wanting the non females in same sex spaces and we should all be respecting gender norms in bathrooms because genitals do not matter especially when excreting waste from the body.

No. 2359050

>>2359033
Keyword is 'social construct'. Social construct means something that constructs you (obviously kek), the implication is you don't really choose how you are constructed and it really molds humans. Leftists and gendies now use social construct to mean 'fake thing i can ignore', because they're illiterate and get all of their concepts from human centipede posting. So they joke about [thing] being a social construct (work is a social construct! time is! etc). This person starts with a distinction between biology and social norms but goes on to imply that since gender norms aren't a real, material thing, then the very categories of woman and man are fake. It's a faulty train of thought that requires you to think socialisation is weightless and easily changeable, this is what you're not 'getting'. And i think this person has nothing to say so she (i assume) pretends to have super sekrit knowledge. Also you should hide your username, no?

No. 2359064

>>2358814
>The world doesnt revolve around you.
nonna I'm sorry to say this but this means the world also wouldn't revolve around you either. I think women being uncomfortable around men that wear feminine dresses is fair.

No. 2359105

>>2358055
>>2358038
The reason men look goofy and weird in women's clothing is because femininity is a sexist construct and all feminine clothing is designed to accentuate and sexualise the female form. When you remove feminine clothing from its original purpose and put it on men you're highlighting just how ridiculous femininity as a concept is.

No. 2359261

File: 1737523409770.jpg (8.65 KB, 218x232, nicole kidman.jpg)

I finally did it. Today is the year I finally cut off the last of my gendie friends for good along with social media. I am free. I always thought it would be cruel to break off a 5 year friendship just because of a disagreement in beliefs, but I've come to realize that in all my conversations ive had with these people its the same circlejerk of "tRaNs RiGhTs!!", "Im totes queerio!!", or "jk rowling evil!!".
The only thing I wish I did was do one last hurrah and say something like fuck trannies and fuck the gendercult then deactivate so they wont feel bad about cutting off the friendship but alas I did the cowards route and just ghosted.

No. 2359351

>>2359050
I'm the op. I'm not on the picture, it was another user

No. 2359368

File: 1737535479989.png (43.63 KB, 830x239, Screenshot 2025-01-22 004420.p…)

>soft butch lesbian gets a concussion
>becomes nonbinary and changes name
hmm

No. 2359379

File: 1737536646886.jpg (30.98 KB, 321x384, troon.jpg)


No. 2359388

>>2358841
This kek , they want absolute control

No. 2359396

>>2359368
Wait is this girl who does crochet and talks about drama with in crochet community? Emily in the moment? or something

No. 2359421

>>2359396
yes, emma in the moment. i loved her videos but there was always that stupid trans thing in the bg i thought was just pandering

No. 2359439

>>2358523
Looks like the tranny domino is about to fall back and fuck up everything else in that picture. Just push forwards, let it fall flat on its face, and everything else will stand on its own just fine.

Also fuck the "free love" under women's rights. I hate that fucking moid psyop that was only put there to make feminists more accessible to nasty predatory men.

No. 2359454

>>2359261
Good for you nona!
>but I've come to realize that in all my conversations ive had with these people its the same circlejerk of "tRaNs RiGhTs!!", "Im totes queerio!!", or "jk rowling evil!!".
This is why troons and handmaidens are so incredibly boring! They literally cannot stop forcing trans into everything they do regardless of context and it's so fucking annoying.
Doing art = drawing nothing but "queer" characters and trans propaganda posters
Anything even mildly political = "this especially affects trans people the worst-"
Any fandom = trans headcanons, "every character is so queer coded", JKR bad
History = "King Charles and Cleopatra were trans actually, cavemen were trans too"
Nature = "my dog is trans and also clown fish can change sex, biology isn't even real btw because tra-"
Literature = "I like this author! ….unlike JKR who is an evil terf who hates trans people"
Talking about your own personal life = "you sound like an egg omg what's your pronouns?", "as a TRANS person I face that too but it's harder for me because I'm trans and very queer"

No. 2359609

>>2359105
hit the nail on the head nonna

No. 2359630

>>2359261
Congratulations nonnie, you are free. Don't beat yourself up for going the ghosting route, the online gendicult is so vicious if you don't simply disappear on them they're liable to try their best to completely destroy you and your reputation (and might as well do it either way). Life is much more free and light once you no longer have to walk on eggshells around mentally ill womanchildren, isn't it?

No. 2359632

>>2359626
How is that an L for them though? The violent ape got in to the womens prison. They don't care about being disgusting and violent, they care about opportunities to rape or oppress.

No. 2359638

File: 1737553020567.jpg (27.8 KB, 601x316, Michelle-James-3.jpg)

TRAs keep on taking them Ls.
>Michelle James, a male who identifies as a transgender woman, was charged with threatening to kill a neighbour in December 2024 and detained at HMP Maghaberry, a high security men’s prison near Lisburn, Northern Ireland.
>James, 63, is a local trans activist and mounted habeas corpus proceedings which the Department of Justice conceded based on a lack of a policy for transgender individuals held in custody. James was therefore moved to the HMP Hydebank Wood, a women’s prison and young offender’s centre located in South Belfast, before being subsequently bailed with strict conditions imposed not to contact the complainant.
https://transcrimeuk.com/2025/01/06/michelle-james

No. 2359641

>>2358718
Ermergherd, YES!!!! Unf, almost cMe looking at such a fine specimen, nonna. Everyone knows that if you don't find sissies attractive you're just a brainwash tradthot into divine femininity. Retards don't know this is what a REAL man looks like!

No. 2359642

>>2358718
Both can be true. Clothes do have no logical gender and that man probably does have a fetish.

No. 2359646

>>2359632
They eventually removed him due to pressure. I'm from there and it's good to see there's a growing women's movement voicing complaints against trannies. One of the unionist parties is now starting to debate these issues openly too. Nationalist parties over here have started advocating for all identity politics for the youth vote and being on the right side of history ignoramus crowd it's good to see some opposition to it finally. Perhaps it's Scotland pushing forward in these issues and the ulster Scots parties realising they can be progressive for women's rights and advocating for the union.

No. 2359651

>>2359368
Emma changed her name to Aspen? Fucking really? These people have to be made in a factory or something. Ah yes, the very gender noncomforming nonbinary petite woman who knits all day while making gossip videos.

No. 2359655

>>2359646
Source?
>But lawyers representing a transgender woman confirmed they are still pursuing a legal challenge amid claims she spent more than a week in a male prison.
>Michelle James, 63, was arrested last month and initially detained at HMP Maghaberry on charges of threatening to kill her neighbour.
>The retired chef, of Main Road in Cloughey, Co Down, allegedly declared an intention to stab the man amid ongoing issues between them.
>She mounted an emergency application for a writ of habeas corpus to be transferred to Northern Ireland’s female prison.
>Those proceedings ended after the move to Hydebank Wood was facilitated just before Christmas.
>James was then granted bail to return to her home address the following day.
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northern-ireland/policy-for-housing-transgender-prisoners-now-in-place-high-court-told-HDSLKDGEA5CRBPLQTJLYFHR5DE/

No. 2359656

>>2358753
>t. Has never browsed through the MTF thread.
Most posts on r/MTF consists of trannies bitching their gay accepting family isn't woke enough because they said they accepted them being gay but didn't agree with the crossdressing and troonism. Infamous mexican meme tranny Wendy Guevara has this exact story, even his ultra homophobic dad came to terms with his sexuality, but his family begged him not to crossdress (not even out of terfiness, but for his own safety) which only made him want to do it more.
>>2359642
What is gender to you? because clothes are absolutely designed with either a male or female in mind and tailored to those proportions. Men and women's bodies aren't the same therefore our fashion isn't either

No. 2359657

>>2358725
I always thought this looked so nice tbh.

No. 2359658

>>2358718
Something about this photo makes me physically ill. Maybe it's because there is a 99.9 chance he has a fetish for women's clothing. The heels seal the deal the me. He just looks bad.

No. 2359661

>>2358748
This is probably one of the reasons a lot of people voted right because they were so massively sick of the trans agenda. These people are psychopaths.

No. 2359663

>>2359656
>What is gender to you? because clothes are absolutely designed with either a male or female in mind and tailored to those proportions. Men and women's bodies aren't the same therefore our fashion isn't either
I get that a woman's skirt is designed with women's proportions and sizes in mind, but I guess I don't understand how the fashion choice is gender dictated. Like if a man got a skirt tailor made for his size, would you still call that a woman's skirt I guess? Just like how women get suits fitted to them, it wouldn't mean they're wearing men's clothing, they're just wearing a suit.

No. 2359665

>>2359261
Hell yeah! Happy for you.

No. 2359667

>>2359379
All this but I can't get a breast reduction that would help my quality of life as a woman. Why cant he just die? I hate that this is new news too… Jan 21. We are already into 2025 and trannies pissing me off.

No. 2359670

>>2359638
Women being TRAs means feminism will never get anywhere. How can they defend someone like this?

No. 2359676

>>2358725
This looks like granny pajamas for fat people. Sorry troononnas, I don't want your nonbinary dystopia.
>>2359663
That's nice, still doesn't change the fact that we live in a culture and time in which skirts are feminine, and thus there's a 9/10 chance any man wearing them is a fetishist, so I reserve my right to judge them.
>>2359064
>I think women being uncomfortable around men that wear feminine dresses is fair.
Thank you, nonna. It's so disingenuous seeing people pretend most of us were born homophobic wenches when we literally had to peak out of troonmaidenry. I already gave feminine men the benefit of the doubt, and they proved themselves to be misogynistic freaks every single time. I'm tired of pretending the way they try to skinwalk us doesn't creep me out, even when I try to ignore it they always have to sperg about pronouns, transwomen and JKR.

No. 2359688

>>2358534
the trans and ‘poc’ part looks like an annoying fuck idiot going hai haiii i’m here too!

No. 2359809

>>2358088
i can't believe people can't grasp a simple shit like this i haven't checked this thread in a long time and it really seems like only people it attracts are retarded ovarit mommies and tradmorons oh my god

No. 2359833

File: 1737560421358.jpg (7.83 KB, 200x252, 3543253426.jpg)

>>2359676
>It's so disingenuous seeing people pretend most of us were born homophobic wenches when we literally had to peak out of troonmaidenry.
well that explains why you are so fucking retarded some of us weren't idiots to begin with actually. every fucking time it's some "peaked" women who keep staying fucking retarded about gender related issues, you just go from one extreme to another based on which online opinions you are being fed because you never actually stop or did stop to think any of this shit yourself. you never actually think why anything is happening ever, you never use your fucking brain to try to understand what exactly is the reason why anything is happening ever.(infighting)

No. 2359846

>>2359667
>All this but I can't get a breast reduction that would help my quality of life as a woman
Sorry to take this sentence and run with it nona but I've been thinking about the Tennessee puberty blockers trial where the ACLU tried to argue that banning puberty blockers for child TiPs was sexist, with the argument being "if you give a female girl puberty blockers, but refuse to give them to a male "girl", it's unlawful because it discriminates/restricts treatment based on sex" and couldn't help but think about how flimsy it was, and what kind of doors would open if that lying-by-omission argument won. With the ACLU's argument, people definitely would be able to use that ruling to claim males getting discount breast implants, hair removal, etc and while women have to pay full price is ALSO unlawful and sexist.

No. 2359939

>>2359833
The seething coupled with the ugly man in a kilt is killing me KEKKKKKKKK Make sure to put on lotion on those hemorrhoids you're sporting, assmad sissy-chaser retard.(infighting)

No. 2359942

>>2359833
She's just a tradthot, you need to stop engaging. Her unintegrated posting style is very obvious and annoying.

No. 2359955

>>2359688
leave the poc part, and get rid of the trans part. Eyesore solved.

No. 2359964

File: 1737566457983.jpg (167.87 KB, 1080x762, 1000005902.jpg)

Woman is when retarded pillow humper.

No. 2359967

>>2359964
But they DEFINITELY want to be normal women just like the rest of us, they DEFINITELY did NOT troon out to skinwalk their anime waifu

No. 2359969

>>2359964
They always sperg out about gender euphoria not being a sexual thing… but every post tagged euphoria on reddit is about a sexual thing.

No. 2360018

>>2359667
>>2359846
Can't these things be treated case by case? A girl going on puberty blockers for her back health isn't the same as giving puberty blockers to a boy because he likes dresses and makeup. What kind of dumbass logic is this?

No. 2360024

I don't understand the clothing is gendered/not gendered sperging. We all agree that a man in a skirt is a man and that a woman in pants is a woman, whether anons think it looks ugly or not is just personal preference.

No. 2360026

>>2360024
This Kek

No. 2360049

>>2360018
Ofc real life is more nuanced, nona. It's a shame that troons have co-opted a medical treatment that can do so much good.

No. 2360059

>>2358762
>A haircut and masculine clothing at a young age would've prevented so many TIF's
I swear i'm not trying to infight, i'm legitimately puzzled by these takes. This is so naive, most TiFs were getting haircuts and masculine clothing at a young age, you had 12yo or even younger TiFs doing this and they were still fully captured by gender ideology. It's not as simple as "if we let everyone wear clothes of the other sex we'll solve troonism". Sure, girls being pressured into makeup and sexy clothing is awful and certainly helped TiF social contagion but it's deeper than that. What would have prevented TiFs from trooning out is taking girls seriously, allowing them to be whole beings, not beating them into feminine socialization, not exposing them to porn and shielding them from sexual violence. Same goes for TiMs, if you have a teenager with budding AGP, letting him wear a skirt and being le open-minded antitrad parent wouldn't do anything because he's already been exposed to porn, has already developed a fetish, is being groomed by older AGPs online and is about to profit from his male entitlement when trooning out.

No. 2360069

>>2360024
Yeah, its super cringe. No one cares you cum to men in suits that doesnt mean suits are only for men.

No. 2360074

my personal opinion: we should all love and support GNC women, but it's ok to not care about GNC men at the same time. that doesn't make anyone a tradthot, maybe they're just a manhater (or maybe they simply dgaf). it's ok to not want to support men in anything and it's ok to decenter men.

No. 2360076

>>2360024
It's a useful smokescreen so we lose track of more important discussions.

No. 2360079

>>2360069
>suits that doesnt mean suits are only for men.
most anons agree with that (and I do too btw), the thing they don't agree with is men in female shaped dresses

No. 2360088

File: 1737569141035.png (46.01 KB, 144x357, tired banana.png)

>>2360079
>making it all about herself again
you are so dense anon… its honestly tiring. It doesnt matter how many times anons explain its not about you liking certain clothes on men or not,, but you keep making it about your personal taste AGAIN.

No. 2360095

>>2360059
>What would have prevented TiFs from trooning out is taking girls seriously, allowing them to be whole beings, not beating them into feminine socialization, not exposing them to porn and shielding them from sexual violence.
this, this would be a big step.

No. 2360096

>>2360079
Yep, it was never about women or androgyny as a whole.
>female shaped dresses
Honestly, who cares about the aesthetic factor. Anons don't want to hype up men in skirts because we all know why they're in skirts in the first place. You can like androgynous men in makeup and goth dresses and still be aware of men's motivations to crossdress, which are overall different than women's (comfort, trends, etc)

No. 2360102

>>2360079
tbh idgaf what a moid puts on his body as long as it covers his privates, he acts like a regular functioning member of society, and he stays tf out of women's spaces.

No. 2360108

Disgusting…child abuse. How tf can she consent to this

No. 2360115

>>2360108
Didn’t she have cerebral palsy? CP doesn’t alter cognitive function.

No. 2360119

File: 1737569791791.jpg (57.1 KB, 482x700, c9b6d90b6d5e1e061596f28a647733…)

>>2360088
i think men in suits are ugly too and women look better in them. it's ok to not care about men and it's ok to admit they make you uncomfortable regardless of what they wear. women wearing male clothes is one thousand times more valid.

No. 2360121

File: 1737569846597.png (37.9 KB, 477x343, false equivalence.png)

It's so depressing to see takes like this getting traction on fucking Tumblr of all places. If someone said this on there ten years ago, they would have been bullied back to Reddit where they belong.

This goes without saying, but if only half of all human beings had hands, and 90% of crimes were committed by the half with hands, and the half with hands spent thousands of years engineering society to subjugate people without them, the people without hands would be 100% justified in viewing hands negatively. Are penises literally used to kill people? Usually not, though people can and absolutely have died from injuries caused by penetrative rape. But that doesn't change the fact that for some reason, having a penis is a pretty good predictor of a person's likelihood to kill or rape another person.

No. 2360125

>>2360115
It doesn't necessarily have to be accompanied by intellectual disabilities but it is possible.

No. 2360129

>>2360119
Women just look better kek. We are so based nonnas.

No. 2360134

>>2360121
This gaining traction on tumblr is actually predictable nonna. Last time there were retards saying that having outdoor public sex was not a crime and that expression of sexuality is actually healthy, even if children are exposed to it…oh and homeless people need to have sex too.
But the week after they were complaining about Karens not using headphones and having max volume in their phones kek.

No. 2360135

>>2360119
>again making it about her personal opinion
dont you get tired of missing the point every time. You are fine to find men in feminine clothes disgusting but you dont have to sperg at women who dont see clothes as gendered and dont mind seeing guys in skirt as long as they dont call themselves women.

No. 2360136

File: 1737570185094.png (439.5 KB, 542x570, Screen-Shot-2016-01-30-at-12.2…)

>>2360129
agreed

No. 2360141

>>2360134
>Last time there were retards saying that having outdoor public sex was not a crime and that expression of sexuality is actually healthy, even if children are exposed to it…oh and homeless people need to have sex too.
wtf? do you have a screenshot or link?

No. 2360144

>>2360115
She's non verbal and can't communicate.(repost)

No. 2360146

>>2358906
>because faggot speak is the least GNC thing about gay feminine men.
please elaborate, this is a take I never really see online. I guess not talking flamboyantly would be more accurate to talking like a woman? but what about the valley girl accent?

No. 2360151

>>2360146
nta but it's unique to a specific subset of males which means it cannot be gender non conforming for males

No. 2360153

>>2360069
>>2360088
>>2360135
>"making it all about herself again"
The irony of saying she was making it about herself when you can't go a single post without mentioning your sissy crossdressing fetish and calling everyone who disagrees a tradthot kekkk… Just go to unconventional male attractions on /g/ or make a separate crossdressing thread if anyone cares, stop sperging about your personal fetish in gender ideology hate thread. This is the place where we bitch about moids in women's panties, not call them hot and parrot gendie talking points. Integrate or go back to reddit, chaser-chan.(infighting)

No. 2360158

File: 1737571038130.gif (4.96 MB, 490x476, john travolta confused.gif)

>>2360153
>in the gender ideology thread
>gets angry when anons hate basic gender ideology arguments like clothes having gender

No. 2360165

>>2360158
"clothes have no gender (therefore I can flash my bulge in the women's bathroom!)" is literally a gender ideology talking point kek how do you think trannies started in the first place? Seriously, just go back to Tumblr, you greatly misinterpreted the purpose of this thread. Abolishing gender would mean no one gets to wear tight sparkly dresses and skirts, not that men wearing it should be normalized and praised.

No. 2360171

>>2360079
I’m going to say the unpopular thing: women defying gender is incredibly cool, males just look fucking ugly and deranged when they wear makeup and dresses because they assume they’re parroting normal women but nothing about that is normal at all. It just looks super strange and classless, the whole drag thing is vomit-inducing too

No. 2360173

File: 1737571724816.png (29.62 KB, 121x102, 1652863796219.png)

>>2360165
>clothes have no gender (therefore I can flash my bulge in the women's bathroom!)
This is literally the OPPOSITE of what everyone is saying. I genuinely have no idea how you can misinterpret something so badly. It has been explained to you several times that, if clothes have no gender, then no matter what a moid wears he cannot get into the female bathroom because wearing skirts doesnt make him a woman. You are actually driving me crazy its like talking to a wall.

No. 2360177

>>2360165
>Abolishing gender would mean no one gets to wear tight sparkly dresses and skirts
Wait, but why? Why is it nobody gets a type of garment instead of everybody can have any type of garment?

No. 2360178

>>2360173
that frog is so fucking CUTE

No. 2360181

>>2360178
she's tired of this shit

No. 2360195

>>2360115
>>2360125
If I remember correctly, she had an electronic neurotransmitter implanted in her brain a few years ago. For some patients it helps modulate their movements and gives them better control of their body. She had complications from the device however and suffered a stroke that required intensive rehabilitation and left her in a worse position than when she started. I’m not entirely sure how much her cognitive functioning was impacted by the stroke or if that has really been assessed.

No. 2360202

>>2360173
Since you're too genuinely autistic to understand something so basic, let me explain it like its apples and oranges for the short bus crowd: That's the feminist utopia YOU live in. As evidenced by real life, the "clothes have no gender" argument has been successfully appropriated by moids who also claim to be female and use their gender non conformity to force their way into female spaces and harass feminists into silence. It doesn't matter how many times you REEEE about how in your perfect world, this wouldn't happen and we'd have a bunch of wholesome "not like other troons" male crossdressing allies because that's simply not the reality we live in, and almost no crossdressing moids have good intentions. If women being uncomfortable with fetishistic men who wear our clothes because they can't wear our skin bother you, you're free to go suck dick in every other troon and gay pandering website.
>>2360177
Nonna please. You genuinely cannot be this dumb. Do some basic feminist reading before coming back here because the reason why both sexes adhering to oppressive beauty standards instead of abolishing them all together would be regressive is quite obvious.

No. 2360205

>>2360165
>no one gets to wear tight sparkly dresses and skirts
Idk people would still enjoy fashion, but you can have men in tight sparkly ornate clothing that fits their frame and isn't just "i took this from my wife's drawer and tailored it, how subversive (i have a fetish but pretend i don't)"
>>2360173
Are you familiar with Phil Illy, nona? He caused a controversy when he showed up to a GC conference in feminine, tight clothing, as an openly AGP man. His argument was similar to yours, "i don't think i'm a woman and i don't want to enter women's spaces so it's fine if i crossdress in public and you're a bigot if you object to my mind game". When he's not freaking out about Nazi GCs taking away his right to wear skirts (no one argued this) he's hyping other male fetishists. AYRT is describing the slippery slope from celebrating male androgyny to enabling male fetishists, the last 10 years have been a painfully long example of what's she's hinting at. Going "yayy king wear that pencil skirt and heels" when women are still the subordinate sex is putting the cart before the horse. We can pretend we live in a perfect world where women are listened to, where we can easily protect female-only spaces so we could support men in women's clothes, but it's 2025 and we can't go back to the 80s. You can't un-bake a cake, men with paraphilias easily connect and organize online/offline, they will say "aha yes i don't believe i'm a woman now can i go out in a pink vinyl schoolgirl skirt" and still try to get in female-only spaces.

No. 2360213

>>2360195
Who would’ve thought putting a satanic brainchip inside of your head would turn you into a vegetable, who would’ve thunkkk

No. 2360214

>>2360202
>the "clothes have no gender" argument has been successfully appropriated by moids who also claim to be female
How can they appropiate something they go against? again, if skirts werent seen as ''female clothes'' then troons wouldnt feel like they deserve the right to get into SEX segregated spaces like women's bathrooms just for putting on a skirt. Its like you are incapable of understanding how gender ideology plays a huge part in troonism. I find women in skirt and tight clothes utterly repulsive, yet i dont want to ban them from wearing the ugly tacky shit they wear. Honestly, if moids were allowed to wear the same tacky trash some women wear then i bet those women would actually see how cringe they look in tight dresses and mini shorts and would go back to wearing comfy clothes instead of pickme clothes. Everyone wins.
>>2360205
No one is celebrating it. That guy does the attention whore shit he does purely because he gets the reacting he wants from people like you. If they all just ignored and didnt get scandalized at an ugly guy in a skirt he wouldnt do that, because he's an attention whore.

No. 2360223

>>2360205
>he showed up to a GC conference in feminine, tight clothing, as an openly AGP man
I don't understand why the conference didn't ask him to leave. If he's openly AGP, then we literally know that dressing in a certain way is a fetish for him. Publicly engaging in fetish is more than enough grounds to be kicked from a conference, especially since those are considered private events so it's up to the discretion of the organizers.

No. 2360227

>>2360214
>if skirts werent seen as ''female clothes'' then troons wouldnt feel like they deserve the right to get into SEX segregated spaces like women's bathrooms just for putting on a skirt
They would. There are ""butch"" troons, troons who make zero effort to dress feminine and they still want to get a kick out of being in female spaces and calling themselves women. AGPs get off things as innocuous as performing certain actions, like knitting, even if you somehow made clothing irrelevant they'd fetishize something else. It's hilarious how little you understand AGP troons.
>No one is celebrating it
Celebrating, accepting, whatever. Point is we disagree that having a positive or neutral view of crossdressing straight men would help with troonism.

No. 2360232

>>2360108
this is horrifying

No. 2360237

>>2360227
>bringing up butches again
Damn anon you super dense. Again, clothes does not make a man a woman. No matter if he dresses feminine or masculine, men are still men. Because sex has nothing to do with gender. AGPs only get off to ''feminine'' things because its so strongly tied to women thanks to gender ideology.
>>2360233
> You're still clinging into your retarded utopia where gender roles and sexism never existed
oh no, someone dares to want a real change? how evil! we are literally never getting out of this troon hellhole because absolutely no one wants to enact a real change. As long as gender stereotypes exist troons will keep on living. Its really as simple as that. Troons only exist because gender exist. If it didnt exist and everyone understood sex differs from stereotypes they wouldnt exist as they do now. YES, some agp scrotes would still exist, but they wouldnt be allowed in SEX segregated bathrooms based on steoreotypes of what they think being a woman is(make up, high heels, etc).

No. 2360239

>>2360227
>even if you somehow made clothing irrelevant they'd fetishize something else
idk about everyone, but most of the gendercrits i know want to make all non-biological things irrelevant. like if a moid is into knitting, just responding to that neutrally instead of mocking him because it's deemed feminine or yass king'ing him because it's unusual for moids. the goal is to get to a social state where most things that aren't related to biological sex aren't gendered and don't have sex-based expectations surrounding them.

No. 2360241

File: 1737574114864.jpg (164.28 KB, 880x1718, 5-59.jpg)

>>2360205
Thank you, nonnie, that was wonderfully put and better explained than I could. Unfortunately she's an genuine troon/crossdressing chaser who's gonna ignore all your points and call you a tradthot, but you're absolutely right. It's crazy how there's self proclaimed "feminists" who can't comprehend men being even more comfortable to wear dresses than they already are isn't a feminist priority and that feminism is still exclusively for women. Also, your example reminded me of baldie with the heels. I remember a bunch of his pictures going viral on radblr with a bunch of radfems praising him for being GNC without being fetishistic or offensive, going "see, men? it's this easy to crossdress without mocking womanhood!". Only to find out he followed a bunch of pornographic content focused on high heels and crossdressing, so it was a fetish after all (what a shocker…). It really doesn't matter if the man is not a hyper offensive caricature like Dylan Mulvaney, women are allowed to be uncomfortable with fetishistic men demanding allyship or praise in general.
>>2360214
>if skirts werent seen as ''female clothes'' then troons wouldnt
If, if, if, if. You're still clinging into your retarded utopia where gender roles and sexism never existed but guess what? They do and that's not changing. We're not talking hypotheticals, we're talking real life. Certain clothes are made for females, and men get off on wearing them. Face it.
>No one is celebrating it
Guess you still can't face reality after all, huh.
Also, your argument is instantly proven wrong by the existence of places like LA where effeminate gays are completely normalized and thus ignored, yet it's still plagued with troons, arguably more than anywhere else.

No. 2360243

>>2360237
>wants "real change"
>The change in question being "we need to coddle trannies more and encourage them to be GNC without calling themselves women! it doesn't matter that that's what feminists did in the first place and this is how we ended up, surely doing the same shit expecting a different result won't blow up in my face!". Please go play with your stim toys already and leave the discussion to the adults with fully developed brains already. The fact that you really think troons will stop identifying as fully masculine "butch lesbians" just because you keep parroting that sex=/=gender is straight up laughable kekkkk.

No. 2360245

>>2360241
>not wanting women to correlate sexy, uncomfortable, tacky clothes with feminine and therefore female is somehow being a troon chaser
its like you dont realize how this affect women more than men. If women see your pic rel(uncomfortable, ugly) as women only, they are going to want to troon out of it. Tifs exist because they are told wearing high heels, tight skirts and thongs is feminine, and TIMs exist because they get off to all that clothes men designed and pushed to women so they get to look like sex dolls while they parade around in comfortable clothes.

No. 2360246

>>2360243
How is coddling trannies telling them that clothe have no gender and they cant be women if they put on a skirt? like are you for real. You sound like the type of women who bullies women who dont want to wear objectifying clothes and shave.

No. 2360248

>>2360242
Men will troon out either way you retard. it's like you don't understand encouraging and praising men to be GNC is what caused men to troon out en masse in the first place. How many trannies were there back when gay rights weren't mainstream and how many are there now that it is?

No. 2360249

>>2360237
>Damn anon you super dense. Again, clothes does not make a man a woman.
Didn't say this. I'm pointing out how troonism isn't purely about style ("butch" designates a style, i'm not saying they're women). You're either dense or a baiter at this point.
> If they all just ignored and didnt get scandalized at an ugly guy in a skirt he wouldnt do that, because he's an attention whore.
If we all ignored strange men in tutus they would stop parading themselves. Fetishists are attention whores, so ignoring them will solve the problem. If a man is laboriously jacking off next to you in public transportation, ignoring will help. If you go a women's club or gathering and a giant hon is standing there in an amazon skirt, just ignore him. I'm sure this will help. If we do this for 20 more years they'll leave us alone.
>>2360239
Yes. Mocking men for having atypical hobbies isn't the point.
>>2360223
They did and he had a meltdown about it online
>>2360241
Thanks, i also thought about him. Our replies were very similar because it's so obvious how misguided this sentiment is
>>2360243
Exactly

No. 2360251

>>2360246
That's not what any of you are doing though, you're just encouraging men to crossdress without telling them they cannot identify as women. And even if you were telling them that, what in the world makes you think they will listen? you sound like an autist

No. 2360254

>>2360248
No, retard. Discouraging men from being GNC is what led to men trooning out. Saying men are women because they wear skirts and make up is the total opposite of being pro GNC people. Do you think that when radfems say men arent women for wearing female clothes they are actually encouraging trannies?
>How many trannies were there back when gay rights weren't mainstream and how many are there now that it is?
So now you are blaming gay rights? you are actually a tradthot. Just say you dislike lesbians, gays and GNC women and move on.

No. 2360257

>>2360251
> you're just encouraging men to crossdress without telling them they cannot identify as women.
I am literally doing the opposite yet your small brain cannot comprehend it.
>what in the world makes you think they will listen?
they dont have to listen, being a tranny should be illegal. Period. Literally most psychiatrists and doctors allow men to troon out because they dont accept men/women can wear different clothes without being of the opposite sex.

No. 2360261

I can't believe this is still going on. I don't think either group is going to change their mind on this.

No. 2360263

>>2360261
New topic suggestions always welcome.

No. 2360264

>>2360254
I dislike gay men as much as I dislike all men, I love and support lesbians and bi women. Hilarious how "tradthot" is the new "TERF" for you dicksucking chasers. If men trooned out because they were "discouraged from being GNC" how do you explain they started trooning out en masse only once male gender non conformity became mainstream and praised? This is such a "poor little men got RADICALIZED into Nazism because women weren't nice enough" MRA talking point i have to laugh.
>>2360257
You're not doing anything but sperging at women who don't like effeminate crossdressers but your autistic brain cannot comprehend you're not an actual activist making any real change.

No. 2360265

>>2360254
>So now you are blaming gay rights?
NTAYRT, but troon ideology was heavily supported by gay rights orgs because they needed to find a new cause after gay marriage was obtained (for funding). This has been discussed before in this thread. Criticizing the gay rights movement doesn't mean you're a tradthot.
>you hate lesbians!!!!
Tell that to the lesbians who were maligned as evil dykes for opposing NAMBLA in pride. I think some of you are still in the grip of "Be kind" liberal feminism

No. 2360267

>>2360265
>>2360265
>I think some of you are still in the grip of "Be kind" liberal feminism
This thread has been reeking of libfem tumblrina for so long, where are they even coming from?(ban evasion)

No. 2360271

File: 1737575259964.jpeg (321.02 KB, 1170x912, IMG_9463.jpeg)

Sorry to derail the argument nonnas, but I was listening to a song that I really enjoy by a female artist named The Buttress and came across picrel in the comments?? Idk what the “drama” is with this specific artist as I just found out about her, but I will say that I am SO fucking sick and tired of seeing tranny shit literally everywhere I go now, can’t even enjoy a song without someone bringing it up and it honestly kinda ruins the song for me.

No. 2360278

>>2360264
>how do you explain they started trooning out en masse only once male gender non conformity became mainstream and praised?
I really want to give you a kiss on the forehead anon. Not only has troonism been a thing for decades(being legal in a bunch of countries since the 70s). Troon ideology is PRO gender norms, not against it. But you will never understand that, you will keep pushing gender ideology and you will keep making women chop their tits off and go on hormones because they dont like that being female is so strongly tied to being sexualized thanks to the stereotypes you love to defend. You are one of those keyboard radfems that love to sperg on lolcow but then irl shes too afraid of not shaving and not looking sexy for men. You are going to keep creating insecure TIF women, while i am going to try and make a change. You are part of the problem. Thats it all, you arent going to change your mind and i am not going to change mind.

No. 2360287

>>2360265
>Criticizing the gay rights movement doesn't mean you're a tradthot
Yeah I mean, there are actually a lot of LGB people who don’t even wish to be affiliated with the LGBTQIA+ madness and just wish to live their own lives.

No. 2360302

I found it funny that Tumblr users love to throw the word terf and radfems around like it’s a slur. Trying to point out that those two set the feminist movement backwards but in what way does including men (both bio and trannies) in this movement worth it when they show little to no respect for women from the dawn of time.

No. 2360322

>>2360287
>LGB people who don’t even wish to be affiliated with the LGBTQIA+ madness and just wish to live their own lives.
there are too many queer faggots who have completely taken over the public image of the alphabet soup that they cant even comprehend normal queers not wanting to apart of the shitshow. too many people think to be queer you respect everyones retarded pronouns even if they are completely incongruent with reality, that you watch drag show, flamboyant. etc. the internet really ruined the queers. I have no clue what it will take for people to diversify the movement.

No. 2360325

File: 1737577630110.png (974.91 KB, 720x1105, BA45484C-553C-4F11-8A2D-3D17E1…)

>>2360263
I’ll go. What is the troon in picrel doing wrong nonnies?

No. 2360326

>>2360325
Posting in the lesbian subreddit when he's a whole ass moid.

No. 2360327

>>2360325
I genuinely, genuinely don't even know where to start.

No. 2360332

>>2360325
>What am I doing wrong?
Everything.

No. 2360335

>>2360325
That is such a scary combover.

No. 2360337

File: 1737578081706.gif (1.97 MB, 615x413, my sides.gif)

>>2360325
>the combover to hide the male pattern balding

No. 2360341

>>2360325
If he'd just let himself live as a straight man he actually might be kind of nice to look at (not anything more because… you know… The AGP thing.)

No. 2360343

>>2360325
He looks like ed sheeran if he decided to troon kekkkk

No. 2360345

>>2360322
>they cant even comprehend normal queers not wanting to apart of the shitshow. too many people think to be queer you respect everyones retarded pronouns even if they are completely incongruent with reality, that you watch drag show, flamboyant. etc
It's unironically so homophobic. Blog but I've had people talk to me completely differently after learning I was a bifag, as in they raised their voice by 20 octaves and acted as if they'd been possessed by an unholy Twitter demon, complete with ~trans affirmations~ every 2 minutes. And then you're a traitor to the cult if that's not cute and flattering to you. Gendies and troons will insist their movement doesn't hinge on regressive gender roles and then normalize this "socially acceptable" stereotyping.

No. 2360374

>>2360278
>But you will never understand that, you will keep pushing gender ideology and you will keep making women chop their tits off and go on hormones
and you assume they'll do all that just because they said they don't want to see men in dresses? jeez. one can hate men and also not want women to chop their tits or trans out. women can dress however they want. men are evil and have ulterior motives.

No. 2360377

File: 1737579478525.jpg (47.83 KB, 700x392, VyAXufwaKAizwPjd92a1GfPzWOdVAI…)

>>2360348
Let it go nonny. We are not going to change eachothers minds. You enjoy your strict gender rules, i will keep trying to abolish them. We already live in a world where men wear comfortable clothes and women are forced into sexualized tight clothes since childhood(picrel) and troons still exist. You will keep sperging about ''muh clothes shaped for female bodies!!'' but the truth is that even when women are little girls and dont have anything to show, clothes is till sexualized, shorter and tighter.

No. 2360381

>>2360377
and I also don't like that type of clothing but I like it less in a man. do you get me, nonny?

No. 2360382

>>2360381
its not about what you dont like, but you dont seem to understand it

No. 2360383

>>2360325
Calling yourself a lesbian when you’re a whole ass male.

No. 2360389

There’s a MTF thread on snow, let’s keep it there.

No. 2360390

>>2360241
See, this looks off to me no matter how I try to view it. Men should not be allowed to wear skirts. There is no reason for them to.

No. 2360392

File: 1737579927531.jpeg (1.21 MB, 1125x1508, 047ED9A8-CC95-472F-9434-9B7623…)

>>2360341
He did post a photo of what he looked like before. He’s super into woo and talked about his dysphoria coming from his past lives kek

No. 2360393

>>2360390
There is no reason for women either, formal wear should be comfortable stuff. I once had to attend an event and i was forced to wear heels. They hurt my fucking foot. Its torture to force women to wear that crap to office and formal events. I genuinely have no idea why heels arent outlawed, there are studies that prove wearing high heels leads to back problems in the long run.

No. 2360398

>>2360135
i responded previously but i want to shorten my response. at this point let's just agree to disagree, i genuinely don't want to be rude but you need to realize that some things you're saying also apply to your posts and there's women that simply don't want to see men in dresses without them being tradthots or wanting to enforce gender norms on other women. it's ok to realize not everyone has to have the same opinion on the matter.

No. 2360399

>>2360393
I agree , I tried heels once and it was torture.

No. 2360403

>>2360377
Nta but you're genuinely so retarded. The clothing is completely irrelevant to troons, because they are skinwalking a woman they want to fuck, not the clothes. They see a goth girl they want to fuck and want to become her, so they dress like her. If the hot girl dressed like a tomboy they'd troon and dress like a boy and call themselves a tomboy. "But if you support gendered clothing you are saying women should dress like sluts!!!" You're so fucking stupid. No, i fucking hate that women are EXPECTED to dress like sluts, but the reason womens clothes is womens clothes is because it is tailored for a woman's body. Just because you remove the woman modifier and say "it's just a unisex top!" Doesn't change the fact that it is tailored to accentuate breasts. All you've done is muddled the language without any results. Body types are a biological reality and just because you want to remove the gendered description of clothing won't change what the clothing's shape. If we pretend everything is gender neutral, that's fucking stupid because it is NOT, there are biological differences. The argument you WANT is that women shouldn't be expected to wear sexy clothing, and men wearing women's clothing does nothing to change the fact that women are expected to do that and put in extra effort into our appearances

No. 2360406

File: 1737580536429.png (829.77 KB, 640x960, whyyyyyyy.png)

>>2360398
Thats perfectly fine i also hate going out and seeing women in sexualized clothes, its funny how you have a problem with one but not the other. But, things wont change anyways no matter how i wish we could get rid of sexualized clothes being ''feminine''. We are already in too deep if you look at how modern female celebrities look next to their male peers. I feel like trans ideology is here to stay because it doesnt matter how much we try, the sexualization of women is here to stay and make women's life hell. Everytime a female celebrity poses in sexualized outfits next to their fully covered male co-star a new tif is born, and also a new tim that wants to be humilliated like that poor female celebrity. Its just how things are and why we are here.

No. 2360408

>>2360237
Part of me thinks GNC men dressed in women's clothes (I mean, "gender neutral because ~clothes aren't gendered~ but with a frilly pink flowery flavor" if you will) not wanting to go into the men's bathroom is a male on male violence problem. Women coddling GNC men is one thing, men are the primary gender role enthusiasts and they will never stop hating GNC men even if said men know they're men and don't identify as women. In the end, men hate anything that reminds them of women, including clothes. Men will never accept GNC men even if they are told to do it since childhood because it only takes one spoilt moidy male to spoil all others.

No. 2360409

>>2360403
The fact you typed all that without asking yourself why ''female fitted clothes'' means accentuating the breasts its why i think our conversation wont go anywhere.

No. 2360410

>>2360326
hes a valid woman you bigot

No. 2360411

>>2351932
"Nutrition guidelines for transgender individuals" kek!

>>2352239
This is hilarious nona I think you should do it.

No. 2360413

>>2360410
KEK truly stunning and brave.

No. 2360420

>>2360417
I genuinely have no idea why you are so mad. I dont think a guy would like any more cringe than a pickme wearing a tshirt that accentuates their pecs. Its weird to want to gatekeep sexist clothes like that, but you do you.

No. 2360421

>>2360417
>I WISH women could wear regular t shirts like men and that would be fine, but that is not the case
NTA and genuine question anon, do you live somewhere where the standard dress is extremely segregated by sex? Because where I live I can walk out the front door and encounter women wearing T-shirts from the men's section within minutes and nobody really gaf. I'm wondering if there's a social norm difference between where some of us live that's affecting the discussion.

No. 2360427

Anonymous 3 minutes ago No. 2360417

>>2360409
I don't WANT it to mean that, but that's what it is, it is a womens top because it is made to sexualize women. Pretending it's gender neutral doesn't change the fact, and it's not trad to acknowledge it. I WISH women could wear regular t shirts like men and that would be fine, but that is not the case and just calling all clothes gender neutral won't stop men from shoving themselves in clothes that are… "gender neutral" but just happen to present tits sexually. You're putting the cart before the horse. The problem is the expectations placed on women. If tomorrow all clothing had no labels men or womens, that would not stop women from being expected to dress for sex appeal, and men thinking sex appeal = femaninity to copy that

No. 2360432

>>2360406
ayrt no i actually also hate sexualized clothes and irl i don't dress like that nor would i encourage others to dress like that either. women are obviously more curvaceous than men, this is what i mean with "female form" clothes, I don't mean constricting or sexual stuff. have you tried wearing male clothes before? i have, i tried for a long time, i was GNC in my teens and early adulthood and they never accommodated my shape, because they're cut and sewn in a way that fits men's bodies better. it's the way clothes are cut what makes them fit certain bodies better, and it's an unfortunate thing but it is a thing.

No. 2360437

>>2360420

I don't want to gatekeep it, I wish it didn't exist, and men adopt womens enforced sex appeal because they thing being subjected to it is inherent to being a woman. You could say, mens clothing is gender neutral, women's clothing is women, because women's clothing is a subjugation on women. Allowing men to wear women's clothes will not erase it as a category.

>>2360421
It's not so much in day to day life, i mostly dress in t shirts and sweatpants, i mean on television, movies, events like prom or the office, anywhere where there is an actual dress expectation, the women are expected to be sexier (prom dresses for women vs suits for men)

No. 2360439

>>2360432
>have you tried wearing male clothes before?
i am wearing ''male'' clothes now, actual hand me downs from my brothers. Unless you want your tits to be exposed i dont understand whats the big deal. I want to be comfortable not look good for men so i dont care if the tshirt i am wearing doesnt show my waist and tits. You are weird.

No. 2360442

File: 1737581741394.png (1.04 MB, 1156x662, Screenshot 2025-01-22 at 1.34.…)

>>2353490
It's because they see a sexy animated character and point at the TV saying "Look that's LITERALLY me!" and totally ignore the fact that she IS a woman and the running gag about her manly voice is meant to be funny.

Hunter Gathers is actually a more accurate portrayal of troons, in that he became a woman as a loophole around the moral code he taught to Brock so that he couldn't be assassinated.
>"No (killing) women or children, it's what separates us from the baddies!"

kek

No. 2360444

>>2360406
You already got rebuffed by multiple anons and couldn't talk back aside from calling us tradthots. But thanks for letting us know you're blackpilled because.. female celebs wear heels. I thought you wanted to make a change kek
>Everytime a female celebrity poses in sexualized outfits next to their fully covered male co-star a new tif is born
Again with the exaggerated focus on clothing. If we put every saudi woman in pants and a t-shirt they would still be legally children, subjected to forced marriage, not allowed to go outside without a male guardian etc. Women's status is symbolized by clothing, but our status isn't clothing in itself. Hijab is oppressive because of the moral code of conduct and expectations that comes with it (showing an arm? You're a slut), feminine clothing is a problem because womeb are expected to be ornamental objects. It's common feminist knowledge that many if not most TiFs are hyperfeminine in their behavior, priorities and values. Likewise, there are women who wear heels, long nails and still are very assertive and GNC in how they relate to the world. This is a common type of poorfag woman in many cultures. So no, a TiF isn't born every time a woman wears pink or a man wears blue. A TiF is born when she's subject to feminine socialization, feminine bullying, develops MH issues etc.

No. 2360447

>>2360443
please, female tshirts are made to stick to your skin and normally have vnecks. They only exist to show off your body like a price. Its disgusting i cant buy female tshirts that dont sexualize you while men are allowed comfortable clothes.

No. 2360448

>>2360439
>Unless you want your tits to be exposed i dont understand whats the big deal.
i don't wear anything revealing either. and i don't show my waist or whatever and my clothes don't cling to me. you're now being rude for no reason.

No. 2360451

>>2360447
You're a little retarded on this or are wearing too small t shirts. A properly sized women's t shirt will just not drape around your waist or make a boob curtain the way a man's would

No. 2360455

>>2360451
I dont care about how it fits my body, it literally doesnt matter to anyone that prefers comfort over looking good for men.

No. 2360463

>>2360451
I wear both mens and womens t-shirts. Even with the correct size, women's T shirts have retardedly short and tight sleeves and are tighter on the body. Visually, they emphasize the waist and breasts. I don't buy v necks but those are very common. They also usually have thinner material but not always. Men's t shirts are just boxy and utilitarian.

No. 2360464

>>2360455
It's not about sexualization. Women have curvier figured where men have straight down figures. A man's t shirt is tight on the boobs and baggy on the waist. A woman's t shirt is meant to be the same consistency across the figure. That's not a sex thing that's just the way the cloth is meant to fit

No. 2360467

>>2360444
>comparing muslim women to western women
moving the goalpost.
>Likewise, there are women who wear heels, long nails and still are very assertive and GNC
libfem ''choice feminism'' crap. GNC isnt about being some fake girlboss femme fatale thats both hot and '''masculine(?)'', its about actually putting your comfort over how you present yourself to others.
> So no, a TiF isn't born every time a woman wears pink or a man wears blue.
you literally have trannies saying they trooned out because they wanted to play with trucks instead of dolls. There is a interview with trannies harry potter did with a bunch of troons and a all of them talk about how they felt like ''women'' or ''men'' depending on what stupid gendered thing they liked as kids.

No. 2360471

>>2360463
I don't know if they emphasize so much as accommodate. Mens t shirts look stupid on me cause they give a boob curtain.

No. 2360472

>>2360447
and i agree with you, but that's why i wear oversized stuff on purpose. i guess i also hate how male clothes don't have space for the boobs or the hips, since both of those are pronounced in my body. this is what i mean.

No. 2360473

>>2360464
>It's not about sexualization
>constantly brings up hips and boobs
sure, anon. Lost of women wear male tshirts and they dont die because their boobs dont show up.

No. 2360476

>>2360471
Huh? There's way more space across the chest in a men's shirt than a women's shirt because men have wider ribcages and the shirts are baggier. The women's shirts are tight across the chest area. Ime If you tucked in the men's shirt you wouldn't have a boob curtain nor would the shirt be suction-cupped to your tits like how women's clothing usually does.

No. 2360479

>>2360473
Because boobs and hips stick out weird in men's t shirts and the fit ends up being too tight in some spots and too loose in others. It's literally not about sexualization.

No. 2360480

>>2360464
>>2360463
>>2360471
this is why i don't know why men would wear female clothes at all unless it's to ridicule or skinwalk us. i don't know if i can trust they're doing it innocently. they have it too easy with their comfy utilitarian clothes so why torture themselves with high heels and tight dresses.

No. 2360481

>>2360473
imo hips and boobs don't have to be sexual when it comes to describing ourselves, it's just that they tend to stick out and men's clothes are too square to fit said shapes

No. 2360483

what are you guys even arguing about at this point

No. 2360487

>>2360476
It's not about the size of the ribcage, you are misunderstanding what a boob curtain is. Mens shirts are meant for straight figures, so your boobs make the fabric stick out in front then it drapes down farther from your body and looks weird, there's a gap between everything after your boobs. Womens shirts are tapered in the middle so it doesn't make a big curtain

No. 2360488

>>2360467
People bring up examples to illustrate an abstract concept. I chose a very clear example so it gets through your thick skull, i could have chosen a subtler western example (women in men's clothes won't solve the wage gap for mothers, won't solve porn, won't solve rape culture etc).
>libfem ''choice feminism'' crap
Missing the point again. The point is comformity is much more than what you wear. Yes, a woman who's assertive, comfortable with being direct, independent and not submissive nor approval-seeking is androgynous, regardless of what she wears. A 6ft tall troon with anger issues, typical male entitlement and misogynistic behavior isn't GNC because he puts on nail polish. You're operating on tranny logic.
>There is a interview with trannies harry potter did with a bunch of troons and a all of them talk about how they felt like ''women'' or ''men'' depending on what stupid gendered thing they liked as kids.
You taking trannies at face value when they're rationalizing bad choices is so funny, please apply for an autism diagnosis

No. 2360550

File: 1737585240872.jpeg (76.23 KB, 1022x731, 9A425ABC-814A-4542-BD99-7D62B2…)

>>2360483
I just want to complain and make fun of trannies. This conversations feels like it has gone on for over 48 hours at this point.

No. 2360561

>>2360241
The thing that always stands out to me with men wearing these type of clothes is that they're just ridiculous regardless of the sex of the person wearing them. It just stands out more when men wear them because we're conditioned to believe that men deserve dignity while women don't. Pencil skirts horribly restrict your movement and require that you keep your legs shaved and/or wear tights. Thin, strappy high heels are hard to walk in, strain your leg muscles, and provide no protection from the elements. Women are encouraged to wear these things in office environments to trick them into making themselves a walking clownporn show for men's entertainment. These clothes exist purely for male gratification, whether they're worn by a woman or a man. There's no reason why suits shouldn't be the standard office attire for both sexes. On the other hand, a man wearing a long, loose skirt (which in ancient cultures has historically been unisex due to being the easiest type of garment to fit and sew, only requiring you to measure the waist and leg length), wouldn't be anywhere near as offensive because the garment does not serve the same inherent purpose of hobbling and humiliation.

No. 2360575

Hating men in dresses doesn't make you a tradthot it makes you a manhater and that's completely ok

No. 2360585

File: 1737586387961.jpeg (628.91 KB, 1125x1888, IMG_7605.jpeg)

sucks being a fujo and so much of the community is either straight married women that trooned out because they discovered yaoi in their tween years or actively trooning out high schoolers that just read kazeki for the first time

No. 2360592

>>2360550
Me too, I’m so damn tired. Let us be the change we want nonna.

No. 2360593

File: 1737586740171.jpg (58.92 KB, 650x592, 8vvkpeo0z8011.jpg)

>>2360585
i have a feeling its probably so bad now that the most popular ships are transed so that it essentially becomes a straight couple but with extra steps. and all the actual homosexual coupling are seen as old school or cringe.

No. 2360594

>>2360406
>its funny how you have a problem with one but not the other.
That anon didn't say any of that kek all they said is that men in dresses look dreadful.

No. 2360601

>>2360550
Sorry kek, should have ignored earlier because it's obviously bait
>>2360585
The younger ones are baffling because they think they're soo special and avant-garde when everything they do has been done already. It makes you want to grab them and show them all the current day detrooners who were exactly like them 10 years ago.
>read kazeki for the first time
KEK exactly
>>2360594
Ignore, AYRT has bad faith and never replies in earnest

No. 2360602

>>2360483
>>2360550
>I just want to complain and make fun of trannies. This conversations feels like it has gone on for over 48 hours at this point.
Same, I usually like reading this thread but I can't even be bothered going through all the meaningless clothes sperging. The worst past is the local troon I see in daily life only wears male clothes and calls himself a butch lesbian tomboy.

No. 2360630

>>2360561
I agree. I wish everyone would just stop denying it

No. 2360641

File: 1737587919177.jpeg (682.67 KB, 1179x2006, 90F2C08E-8529-46C3-8B44-E2E55C…)

>>2360592
I’ll bring up a new topic then. Is it true that troons are struggling to get hired? Picrel made me think about it. If I was a hiring manager I would probably put a tranny resume immediately in the trash just due to liability. This is assuming they are applying for something where they need to be more than a warm body and actually work with others. I can’t imagine what benefit they would bring other than inflating the number of “women” that work at a company. (1/2)

No. 2360646

File: 1737588035871.jpeg (750.21 KB, 1179x2001, 2374B576-BF8A-42C7-81B6-1C38E3…)


No. 2360649

>>2360641
Sorry but in a world where most people can't get their job benefits to pay for basic life saving Healthcare, of course people are going to look at you crazy when you're getting everything most people want and yet you're asking your employer to pay for elective cosmetic surgery.

No. 2360655

>>2360641
It seems to be true. The ones with good jobs had them before trooning out.

No. 2360659

>>2360641
How do they even earn with online prostitution kek, it seems like every tranny does it.

No. 2360662

>>2360641
Noone would like to hire a literal brand risk that can chimp out any minute because brenda called a man a man and I hope they start doing this in the education sector too (considering the shitshow the "womens" job expos were)

No. 2360668

>>2360662
They’re an HR nightmare and they always want special privileges. I would also toss the resume if I read “nb” or “transgender”.

No. 2360682

File: 1737589021505.jpeg (1.14 MB, 1125x1983, AFFF568F-FD1F-49CE-8A46-708CE6…)

>>2360662
The thing that finally made me start posting on LC after lurking for years was how outraged I was at GHC 2023. And that the prevailing discourse wasn’t about men obviously taking away opportunities for women, but that we shouldn’t question someone’s gender because they look like, talk like, and act like a man.

No. 2360687

>>2360641
Friend of mine works in a recruitment agency, he's effectively a tard wrangler for antisocial men in IT jobs. Every now and then he comes across a troon, they complain about not being taken seriously as women and being mocked by older coworkers for showing up to work in tranny gear. Many of them hop from company to company because they can't handle the lack of validation

No. 2360702

>>2360641
>>2360646
He could detransion and he would be completely fine.

No. 2360705

>>2360687
Do you think because of troons the companies got so tired of their bullshit that the funded the ai that will eventually take over IT jobs?…troonism really fucked this world up didnt it

No. 2360839

>>2360687
Its not enough that they steal jobs from women, they have to be worshipped for it, huh?

No. 2360867

>>2360641
>>2360646
The only positive thing about this is that people got so tired of tranny shit at the workplace that now instead of accommodating them they're not hiring them anymore. Back in 2015 they would fire people for not being supportive enough of trannies. Now the trannies are the ones getting fired.

No. 2360875

>>2360641
>does sex work
Almost guaranteed they're googling him and finding it and it's getting his resume thrown in the trash.

No. 2360879

>>2360687
I have a friend in HR. Troons are actively discriminated against because of their troonism. A lot of small companies especially don't want to hire them because of the assumed loss of working hours from their transition/Healthcare, their general degenerate personalities, and increased employee complaints.

No. 2360905

File: 1737594186995.jpg (241.64 KB, 1512x2016, Ghn9oZna4AACcbr.jpg)

>>2360641
>be white male
>by default, world will bend over backwards for you
>have career many people would kill for
>decide to throw it all away just to do "sex work" and call yourself a rat girl on twitter
making up problems and crying when he gets fucked over for it. not that it even matters, probably. faggot's probably loaded

No. 2360914

File: 1737594404626.png (1.96 MB, 1756x970, Screenshot_103.png)

>>2360905
samefag but how is it possible for them all to be this delusional

No. 2360916

>>2360271
Buttress is a feminist and doesn’t kowtow to tranny bullshit afaik. Brutus is precisely about women’s dehumanization and I lurked her twitter (logged off) and a bunch of her top posts were radical/gender abolitionist feminism adjacent. It was actually a pleasant surprise when I first looked her up kek. Trannies call the song “trans coded” because they can’t understand the world without the lens of their retarded ideology and have no nuance so they can’t conceptualize women wanting to escape womanhood to be seen as equal rather than because they’re ~so trans~. If she said something explicitly anti gender ideology my respect for her will have increased tenfold. Brutus trending among trannies is so funny.

No. 2360918

>>2360905
He tapers off like a worm.

No. 2360919

>>2360914
He looks like the most average corporate scrote kekkk

No. 2360921

>>2360916
Brutus is so fucking awesome. Glad to find another fan and to learn she doesn't kowtow to bullshit.

No. 2360923

>>2360914
The even sadder thing is he's edited the photo. Imagine that walking towards you in a dim lit room.

No. 2360924

>>2360914
Autistic facial blindness perhaps? Or maybe just the sheer power of copium.

No. 2360928

>>2360914
Why are these skinwalkers allergic to putting on makeup properly? Would following a youtube made by a real woman cause dysphoria or some shit?

No. 2360929

>>2360923
Imagine having to share a bathroom with it

No. 2360934

>>2360271
Buttress is a feminist and doesn’t kowtow to tranny bullshit afaik. Brutus is precisely about women’s dehumanization and I lurked her twitter (logged off) and a bunch of her top posts were radical/gender abolitionist feminism adjacent. It was actually a pleasant surprise when I first looked her up kek. Trannies call the song “trans coded” because they can’t understand the world without the lens of their retarded ideology and have no nuance so they can’t conceptualize women wanting to escape womanhood to be seen as equal rather than because they’re ~so trans~. If she said something explicitly anti gender ideology my respect for her will have increased tenfold. Brutus trending among trannies is so funny.

No. 2360997

>>2360928
it would require them to use actual drag queen makeup techniques, normal female makeup will not work on a male. hsts troons almost always have that kind of makeup on in question and that kind of makeup requires a shit ton of practise and trial and error. Normal women tend to forgo foundation and have makeup looks that take far less time and effort compared to drag queens, so they aren't about to sacrifice not having their fetish fulfilled by having to admit to themselves that they need specific makeup that hides their masculine facial structure. Plus, we are talking about ape brained misogynistic men who probably think makeup is so easy, they will pat themselves on the back for slapping it on their faces and the handmaidens will contribute to their delusions. Since agp is a fetish, the mere sensation and thought of wearing makeup is getting their dicks hard, it doesn't matter if it looks good, doing stuff that is considered feminine makes them a woman in their minds and that is enough for them. They are arrogant and highly narcissistic, they won't take any kinds of tips to improve their makeup even from troons who actually know how to do makeup because it will be seen as an attack to them.

No. 2361044

>>2360924
It’s male audacity

No. 2361103

>>2360914
>I've had people literally think I'm a woman from behind and then say "oh you're a dude, sorry bro" the minute […]
Kekkkkkk??? They cannot be serious. How much did they lower the bar for passing to think this is a flex.

No. 2361118

>>2360928
Tbf I don't think the make up and clothing on this one is that bad, it's just his face that's so utterly horrid the make up only ends up enhancing his ugliness. The eyeshadow is unblended and not fit for his eye shape, but otherwise everything looks decent, it's just those papercut lips and utterly male facial structure that cannot be salvaged. Most trannies are stuck in this "Take her swimming on the first date!" retardation where they're convinced all women are ugly catfishers who get %90 of their beauty in the make up process, therefore so can they. When in reality, there's no make up to save you if you're ugly enough. You need to have a good facial structure and features to begin with, because even those women who make transformation content out of being catfishers look like trolls once the ringlight and shooping is off.

No. 2361141

>>2358014
No. I think they're likely to be ill-fitting and make the wearer look silly by our current societal fashion standards but they're literally just cloth and there's nothing inherently morally wrong with an adult wearing a small pastel shirt that has a Sanrio character on it. What counts as "children's clothes" varies greatly by time and culture and there is no universally agreed upon human clothing for children only. Diapers come the closest and I don't ever see those catching on as a mainstream fashion statement since they indicate disabilities in adults.

No. 2361146

>>2360879
>A lot of small companies especially don't want to hire them because of the assumed loss of working hours from their transition/Healthcare,
I don't know how to articulate this properly but so many people go through this with health issues and disabilities they can't control, it makes me mad that troons are doing this to themselves on purpose but they still want to have their cake and eat it too while claiming to be victims.

No. 2361189

File: 1737601702418.jpg (53.59 KB, 1024x889, FB_IMG_1737601621758.jpg)

I'll do fight for tifs, enbies and theythem. I'll leave the tims die alone.

No. 2361190

File: 1737601719847.jpg (31.63 KB, 480x640, 4ed5cd11-3035-4979-a40f-8fb312…)

>>2361141
>there's nothing inherently morally wrong with an adult wearing a small pastel shirt that has a Sanrio character on it. What counts as "children's clothes" varies greatly by time and culture
Can't they at least wear the kawaii sanrio shirt in an adult size that fits their adult male body though? It's ok for men to like sanrio I guess but wearing a children's garment is too much and the implications are weird.

No. 2361222

>>2360585
>>2360593
It baffles me how in the official fujo discourse threads here on lc, they fervently deny yaoi/BL's link to girls and women trooning out just because maybe they themselves didn't fall to it. I guess they're ashamed and can't take their beloved choice of media being criticized. Sure, there are a lot of factors at play that can cause young girls to troon out, but yaoi is a big contributor to that. Doesn't mean we should ban it, but we need better education on the dangers of troonism and the reality of it all. We also need better social conditions for women so they can just just be themselves and not feel limited by their sex, thereby causing them to want to escape through troonism. Although just like the majority of male troons are straight up AGPs, there's a lot of female AAPs as well.(fujosperging outside of containment)

No. 2361390

File: 1737609054277.jpg (82.15 KB, 621x482, 1643888342442.jpg)

>>2360585
This happens in all shipping sectors. Straight and yuri ships are also cursed with gendies and troons. Its a nerdy girl disease. At least with straight/yaoi ships you only have to deal with female troons, in yuri spaces you have to deal with pedophilic sex pest TIMs that think they are lesbians because they like catradora. Its so tiring.

No. 2361457

File: 1737611765314.png (712.04 KB, 599x2231, 78FB82A4-017F-4491-ACFB-7D121A…)

>>2361222
I honestly think it’s just the type of person who is attracted to consuming yaoi, given permission to transition into a bishounen because that’s totally valid, mixed with social contagion. You see a similar thing play out with men who want to be anime girls. They talk about Konata being their transitioning goal, they are validated for this, and are in a group where this is a normal occurrence. But I don’t really see the conversation being about how moeshit is causing men to troon out nearly as often. There’s a correlation definitely but it isn’t a causation and instead is probably due to other factors. I wonder how much of what we see is some weird manifestation of autism tbh
deleted and reposted for a better picrel

No. 2361460

>>2361457
what the fuck is this cope? It's an underaged girl dressed like a slut engaging in violence.
OF COURSE ITS FOR MEN.

No. 2361467

>>2361460
Kekkk this is just like if men said the whole Playboy thing was ackchyually for women because what man's aesthetic is pink bunnies

No. 2361484

>>2361457
It's not a thing with yaoi or anime, it's communities as a whole, the infight threads ended up in that direction as well, pointing out how people trans out in clusters, and how it's similiar to suicide clusters.
But, it's easier to blame certain genres than it is to admit that fandoms as they are structured now are a good reason as to why there's so many trannies nowadays.

No. 2361492

File: 1737613911722.jpg (231.75 KB, 1179x1005, tumblr_716e02b55537192e9e41d38…)

>>2361222
As a fujo myself, I haven't ever denied the correlation, personally. It's impossible to when one of my hobbies has been so heavily colonized (and nearly ruined in the West) by TiFs. My issue is when people are overly reductive and assume that there is a pure causal relationship between yaoi or slash shipping and trooning out. That is the thing I dispute, because it ignores the multitude of other contributing factors involved.

I think >>2361457 and >>2361484 have the right idea; it's about the type of person attracted to the genre, and the social clusters that form as a result. It's not that reading yaoi is some kind of Clockwork-Orange-esque mindfuck that makes someone cut her breasts off. Rather, if you are an OSA woman who is uncomfortable with some aspect of straight relationships in fiction (be it the sexualization of the woman, the inherent power imbalance, etc.) you are likely to be drawn to male-male romances. Additionally, if you are nerdy, an outcast, autistic, or have low self-esteem, you may find hyper-fantastical things like anime, science fiction, fantasy, or cartoons more appealing. The sum of all that is that there's a lot of overlap between the women who troon out and the type of women who like yaoi, which makes yaoi fandom an easy recruitment space for gender ideology. This compounded by female socialization, which causes women to feel intensely guilty for enjoying anything considered even remotely unethical. They want to re-contextualize their "problematic" enjoyment of gay fiction as activism or an expression of identity, even though the hobby isn't inherently problematic to begin with.

Once someone drinks the identitarian Kool-Aid, though, it's very difficult to convince them that straight women do not pose any kind of material or physiological risk to gay men; males are the ones committing 98% of sexual assaults, and that includes the ones perpetrated against gay men. The gay media made by women for women is typically drawn or written, whereas the (predominately pornographic) lesbian media made by men for men involves the exploitation of actual actresses. Lesbian porn created for male consumption is unethical because of the real-world context it exists in, where roughly half of all lesbians have been sexually assaulted, and three-quarters of those assaults were perpetrated by men.

No. 2361498

>>2361492
It has nothing to do with the medium itself. Its honestly women just doing female socialization things and moralfagging about the porn of choice other women consume instead of targetting men that get off to horrid shit like barely legal teens. Men never get criticized as much as women do. Gay men into bara are shooting loads to men with straight up lactating man tits but you dont see antifujos claiming those men arent actually gay. Its really just moralfagging by women who dislike the genre but cant be honest and say they find it gross because then they would be closer to straight men who hate yaoi purely because ''yucky gay!'' and not for some ''valid'' morally righteous reason.

No. 2361503

>>2361498
Nta but I think a lot of it has to do with how women are shamed (99% of the time by other women) for liking it. "You're fetishizing actual gay men for reading that stuff, you're so creepy and disgusting and you're contributing to homophobia!!" well these women know they aren't homophobic or being a creepy fetishizer, and with how common TRAs are in fandom spaces, the conclusion is "hmm maybe I'm actually a man and that's why I like it!" Obviously this doesn't apply to everybody but I think it's kind of ignorant to pretend it isn't like that for some women. Like there was a woman who had actual rabid haters coming after her on every post she made because she liked yaoi kek, they even tried to make a thread about her in /w/ simply because she read yaoi.

No. 2361506

>>2361498
Nta but honestly I think it could be summed up as humans were never meant to be this socialized at such a young age and they weren't meant to have this 24/7 opportunity for fantastical larping online.

No. 2361510

>>2361492
As an old school fujo, I am just used to being shit on. Even before the tranny shit (before fujo was even a term), people would shit on you because you liked yaoi and moids would chimp out on you for shipping 2 dudes (fag moids would call you a bigot. I could kind of sympathize since I knew some fujos who did fetishize gay men… But then again why the fuck would most fags give a shit they will have anonymous sex in wolf suits.)
I swear to god pre 2020 there wasn't an aiden invasion in the yaoi community, even the cringe ass ones. Maybe some gendie spergs on tumblr but none of this shit where they'd give the bottom mastectomy scars.

But yeah, it's a tough life being a fujo nona. You're strong. Keep objectifying hot fictional men.

No. 2361515

File: 1737615339556.png (334.79 KB, 875x676, brain hurts.png)

>>2361498
>>2361503
Speaking more generally, I'm fed up with how moralfaggotry is part of every single retarded internet debate these days. No one knows how to just say that they hate something for reasons of personal taste anymore. No, now everybody has to perform mental gymnastics to find some kind of sociopolitical justification for why it's Morally Incorrect to enjoy the shit they dislike. I can't even remember the last time I saw a fandom shitstorm where moralfagging wasn't employed by one or both sides.

Jesus Christ, it's okay to hate or love things for superficial reasons! Everybody stop trying to find social-justice-based rationalizations for why art makes them feel a certain way before we all go insane. Just accept that you are a monkey and that certain stuff scratches your brain the wrong way.

>>2361506
The internet should really have been 18+ at the outset. So many retardation could have been prevented.

No. 2361522

>>2361222
The problem is that you likely weren't into yaoi 15 years ago where aidens were practically non-existent in the community. I recall being somewhat into it at that time and the pipeline literally didn't even exist at all. To say that yaoi is the cause for some tifs to troon out is a completely inaccurate statement and it doesn't consider how we even got to this point. Without the early adopters to troonery such as jammy dodger, buck angel ect showing women that "becoming a man" is even a thing that could happen, the pipeline wouldn't exist. Wider acceptance and platforming of the trans identity paired with the increased accessibility to drugs and procedures is the bridge to being a simple fujo to being indoctrinated into the trans cult. Even so, there's still a lot of young women and girls despite it all in the current day who will not go down the pipeline meaning that there has to be other factors at play to push them down it such as depression, a strong desire to escape reality, low self-esteem and lack of satisfaction in life, which already are the standard conditions that produce a troon regardless if they consume yaoi or even their sex.

No. 2361526

File: 1737616275480.jpeg (71 KB, 260x366, A1C33A4D-A576-4219-948E-3912B1…)

>>2361522
Ntayrt but your response made me realize that my interactions with BL and yaoi were 15 years ago kek. I feel downright elderly.

No. 2361529

>>2361526
yeah it weirded me out when I first heard the term fujo. I'm guessing fujoshi wasa term made up by seething loli moids who were mad that women found a little niche to be happy in that scrotes couldn't invade.

No. 2361534

>>2361522
yeah I was into BL starting age 11 or so (didn't know what shipping was back then because no access to online fandom spaces) and I'm 32 now. there weren't any fujos that trooned out until a few years ago. I did have the add fandom friend who was like "uuuughh I wish I could be a gay boy!" but they usually forgot about this shit when they got into their first sexual relationships, stopped being disconnected from their own bodies/sexualities and realized that women could have orgasms during sex. the only shit fujos had to deal with back in the day were smug older fujos haters who called all fujos virgins for wanting to see two guys make out. in my (German) communities it was usually cool girl pick mes who wanted to appeal to male fujo haters by knowing what irl gay sex looks like. all that troon shit only showed up in recent years.

No. 2361535

>>2361529
I believe you’re right. I know fujos embrace it in a sort of tongue-in-cheek way, but the widespread acceptance and usage of it in western fandom is odd to me. I remember when BL was still pretty niche and no one really wanted to be associated with it.

No. 2361542

I feel bad for young fujoshi because now they are gonna be moralfagged by pickmes and fags and then be accused of being a tranny on top of it.
Moids fight tooth and nail to shame and degrade women who objectify their sex.(off-topic)

No. 2361568

>>2361542
Lolkek

No. 2361572

>>2360487
this isn't true at all

No. 2361593

File: 1737620930469.jpg (1.7 MB, 1630x2622, 9780349726601-1681033073.jpg)

Has anyone read picrel? Is it worth reading? I know Kathleen Stock has some views that are a bit too pro-troon for many anons here, but based on her interviews she sounds very rational and good at forming her arguments.

No. 2361599

>>2361189
yeah. we don't fight for men who call themselves "girls" so they can invade female spaces

No. 2361628

File: 1737625060030.png (15.47 KB, 500x232, 44fryw.png)

>>2361522
>into yaoi 15 years ago where aidens were practically non-existent in the community

No. 2361634

Retard next to me and my wife in the train was playing music super loud. Didn't even especially clock him as a tranny but I should have, the foreign accent gave him some leeway, but my wife clocked him immediately. Told him the music is fucking annoying. Retard pouts, turns the phone off, waits ten minutes then starts to mald, telling me I'm rude and I could ask him normally. I tell him he was rude first with his fucking music and he doesn't get to be pissy cause someone told his ass off. tard starts arguing, not telling everything cause it's retarded and boring, but fucking train security (that somehow was around for once) gets involved.
Dude probably had a hateboner for troons because he wouldn't leave him alone lmao, this was great. Arguing back to him for ten minutes and thretening him with a 150€ disturbance ticket. I wish he would have actually written him.
Eventually security dudes leave and the troon is still malding. Finally tells me "you're not upset because of music, you're upset because I'm a transgender woman" and me who was so fucking pissed at that point just outright said "oh THAT'S why you're so fucking annoying" kek.
Anyway he started bitching about that instead, telling us we were transphobic and being like "you're not gonna be happy in Paris there's trans women everywhere!" in a loop.
If I had not already been transphobic I would have been after this, let me tell you.

No. 2361639

>>2361634
Being unnecessarily loud on trains and disturbing the peace is absolutely male behavior. He gave himself away with that alone. I don't get why men have to be so fucking loud in public spaces. It's like no one ever told them to STFU as a child

No. 2361642

>>2361593
I enjoyed it. She read the audio book too.
It helped me to understand some of the theory behind gender ideology arguments.

No. 2361656

File: 1737629659339.jpg