File: 1750606691360.png (276.48 KB, 1280x1280, 1750293605513.png)

No. 2574678
This thread is to discuss your grievances with gender ideology.
>What is gender ideology? Foundational to transgenderism, gender ideology is the belief that one’s “internal gender” can contradict one’s biological sex.
Gender ideology operates much like a religious cult. There is no scientific evidence that supports the notion that we have an “internal gender,” and yet doctors now medicalize and sterilize children with “transgender identities” who have been groomed by the cult. Anyone who does not reaffirm these delusions is labelled as a “transphobe” in order to discredit any dissenting voices of the cult.
Relevant threads:
MtF/Trans-Identified Male General
>>>/snow/2125031FtM / fakeboi / TIF general
>>>/snow/2121594Ovarit Archives
https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/38865.html#38865Resources:
Peak trans stories from banned Gender Critical subreddit:
https://www.saidit.net/s/GenderCritical/comments/54yt/gcs_peak_trans_archived/ Peak trans stories from Ovarit:
https://pixeldrain.com/l/JTwRJCYR “Listen to trans people” series:
https://x.com/marycatedelvey/status/1897370783816790064 “You told me you were different” TIM on TIF violence anthology:
https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=1E3552778745CA46FE01054D2886BB3DPrevious threads:
#18:
>>>/ot/2550803#17:
>>>/ot/2524267#16:
>>>/ot/2506783#15:
>>>/ot/2490064#14:
>>>/ot/2473199#13:
>>>/ot/2444792#12:
>>>/ot/2405643#11:
>>>/ot/2373578#10:
>>>/ot/2351915#9:
>>>/ot/2290853#8:
>>>/ot/2252408#7:
>>>/ot/2191693#6:
>>>/ot/2121106#5:
>>>/ot/2097274#4:
>>>/ot/2037097#3:
>>>/ot/1991983#2:
>>>/ot/1941872#1:
>>>/ot/1894283 No. 2574763
File: 1750610750957.webp (162.69 KB, 1125x1396, IMG_8244.webp)

I can't stop thinking about how someone the other farms brought up how testosterone doesn't just affect children of TIFs but grandchildren. Especially since eggs are formed in utero for any female children. Testosterone is a carcinogen and a teratogen. I don't understand how we tolerate TIFs poisoning children. Or using T-gel which gets everywhere and exposes other unwilling people or animals to poison. Even small amounts of the gel contain high does of T to contaminate food or anything they touch.
No. 2574912
>>2574471 Nayrt, but personally I wouldn't want to "show off" around a tim. If he were to become angry enough to write a reddit post about it, then he'd probably fantasize about hateraping you to "conquer" the woman who made him feel inferior.
>>2573464I'd suggest wearing swim-trunks and some kind of swim-shirt/a one-piece under it if you have to be around him. At the core of it, he's a man and he probably likes ogling women even if it also makes him angry because he can't have/be you.
No. 2574957
File: 1750618313393.jpg (191.27 KB, 1217x731, tumblr_3eb9c64833e73602ad2c4e9…)

>Hmm. Today I will look up fanart of my IDV mains sucking face.
>Find picrel
We already know what kind of mental illness causes people to become trans, but what in the goddamn is causing kids to see fictional characters like "autistic serial killer guy" and see "OMG POLYROMANTIC TRANSFEMININE ACHILLEAN SOFTBOY WHO'S QUEER PLATONIC WITH MY FICTIONKIN IDENTITY :3333"? Because we need to find the source and kill it fast.
No. 2574969
>>2574825I don't have proof of anything, but since magatards are an American voter group, and uk feminists are on another continent, I'd think that would be a good enough reason to assume it's not happening. What are UK feminists going to do about a country with 10x the population across an ocean?
>>2574763This is especially disturbing when I think about the fact I and several of my (now normal, healthy, and in most cases, straight) friends used to all talk about this and agree we wish we were born boys after puberty hit. None of us trooned out and I was probably the only one who was even notably GNC. I'd like to think if I was younger and 13 when all this was happening I still wouldn't troon out because I have never really followed youth fads like my peers did but I'm pretty sure at least one of my friends and many similar girls would have. Isn't it extremely common for girls to wish they were boys once puberty hits and they realize all the downsides to growing up female?
No. 2574988
>>2574977Normally I just stick to ignoring the global chat and looking for fanart on Pixiv, but Tumblr still has a lot of good fanartists who prefer the archival system the site offers. But there are either A) A bunch of retards who never got over their 2012 Tumblr phase or B) A bunch of children who heard Tumblr was cool who still post shit like this.
It's hard and nobody understands orz
No. 2575007
File: 1750620816669.jpeg (52.22 KB, 738x415, A4C4345C-01AB-4E6B-A3E1-94F457…)

Went on an outing into the city yesterday and the ugly ass “progress” troon flags painted over what used to just be a rainbow still pisses me off. I don’t feel safe using the restrooms out there anymore. But when I went to the game store the girl at the counter was talking to me about hogwarts legacy unprompted and how good it runs and that made me feel slightly better.
No. 2575021
File: 1750621649193.png (318.53 KB, 720x794, 5454456654654.png)

>>2574763>A young girl goes through puberty and is immediately objectified by the patriarchy.>She (reasonably) hates it. She internalizes that hate, so she wishes she could change rather than society changing and learning to humanize women and not treat them like objects for sexual gratification.>Instead of teaching this young girl about feminism, self love and dismantling the patriarchy, troons tell her, "Yes, you were born in the wrong body! If you go on harmful drugs for the rest of your life, then you can 'fix' your deeply flawed (flawed being she is a woman that doesn't like being commodified) body!"Disgusting. I fucking despise these 'people'.
No. 2575343
Trans Academic "Andrea" Long Chu wrote a book which is literally his sissy force-fem fetish
>Femaleness is a universal existential category defined by the assumption of a desire which is not one’s own. It’s not just that other people are forcing you to do things; it’s that your desire comes from without you, it does not originate within you, but it is assumed as your own. That being the case, the theory of gender that I put forward in the book is that gender is the opposite of a sexuality: your sexual identity is the expression of “your own sexuality”; your gender identity is the expression of someone else’s sexuality. It has to do with what is assumed in the production of desire in the first place. So, being a “woman” – and this is the most traditional second-wave [Catharine] MacKinnon line – is defined as being what a man wants. Now I find that very appealing; it can then be diversified significantly. We don’t have to be talking about women, we can be talking about men, or more specific kinds of gender, like a certain type of trans-femininity. I also describe gender in the book as a coping mechanism, as how you cope with femaleness. Because femaleness in its most pure, unmediated form, is self-abolishing – that is abolishing of the self, not abolishing of femaleness. It’s destructive, self-abnegating. So gender is also an attempt at degrees of defeminisation, “un-femalisation” – so as to make being female survivable. Because otherwise you would just be completely flattened out by the force of the desire of the other. In that sense those quote-unquote men and quote-unquote women, are attempts to reconcile with and to repress femaleness.>On a granular level, it’s a riposte to Freud, actually. In Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, he’s thinking about the libido. Running through those essays, there’s a lot about the “active” and “passive” and how he is uncomfortable with those terms. He sounds like a gender-studies student. Eventually he says, “Well, I guess you could call the libido masculine, but only if you understood masculine as not really to do with men, but to do with the active position.” He’s already aware that there’s something weird about using a gendered term for this thing that he wants to define psychodynamically – in terms of interpersonal relation. The move of my book was to say, no actually that was wrong, or it was half-right. Freud was right that the libido has only one sex, he was just wrong about which sex it was. Which is to say that – to use another Freudian term – I too would assert the universality of the castration complex, but I have the opposite interpretation of it. Which is that it’s not that the little boy is afraid that he is going to be castrated, but he is afraid that he is going to like it.>It’s long been accepted that there is a difference between the phallus and the penis. The phallus is an ideal category to which the penis strives. The penis itself, in not being a phallus, is a sign of castration. The fact that you have a penis and not a phallus is already a first step towards castration. Even if your penis hasn’t been chopped off yet. I am taking advantage of that discrepancy, as any Lacanian would, but pushing it in the opposite direction.>Inevitable, the question is not whether or not you will have it, the question is, what it will mean that you don’t have it. The trick of patriarchy – and this is very much a Solanasian idea – is to convince everyone that not having the phallus is a bad thing, when in fact it is the thing that everyone desires the most: the relief of no longer having to hold yourself to phallic idealisation>One would be a different relation to TERFs. I’m willing to get cosy with them, in a way that I like to imagine is uncomfortable to them, but it is also uncomfortable for other trans people. I am willing to say – what actually leads Sheila Jeffreys or Janice Raymond to say the things they say? Rather than ignoring that stuff because I find it offensive or transphobic, which I do, I try and engage with that tradition, though it’s sad to call it a tradition. This is because I believe that the best way to develop a strong defence against those ideas is to deflate and dismantle their arguments, and that means getting very close to them. You know, I occasionally get called a TERF on Twitter or see myself referred to as kind of TERF-y. And I understand why people say that. I get the discomfort with my approach. But that feature would certainly be one component. Second is a shift to desire. This is arguably a return to desire – in the sense that in early sexology, those first medical conceptions of “transsexuality” or “transvestitism” under people like Magnus Hirschfeld and the Institute for Sexual Science, transness was understood as a sexual phenomenon. Transsexuality is a sexuality. That was an old sexological idea. And that necessarily fell away in the course of trans people trying to define themselves outside of a medicalised system, and trans people seeking legal protections. For this, it was necessary to cut sexuality out of the equation. In that sense, bringing sexuality back would be a characteristic of a second wave of trans studies. And I acknowledge that there is a sort of dialectical nature to it. Indeed, one could not have started where I started. You need the first wave in order to have a second wave. But the reintroduction of sexuality into transness is really essential. It’s what the ignorant Christian people that I grew up around would have thought – that I was a form of sexual perversion, not gender perversion, specifically sexual perversion. So I take some pleasure in at last agreeing with them. https://magazine.tank.tv/issue-81/talks/andrea-long-chu No. 2575370
>>2575343Moids have 0 theory of mind. If being a woman is “being wanted”, what does that say about men? Are men men because they are wanted by women? No, because women according to his definition, women do not have an internally motivated sense of attraction.
Therefore men are only men if they want women, if they become an usurper of a female’s sexuality, which she has no option but to acquiesce to (because she’s a woman, and this is his definition of woman). Ironically, this is exactly what troons do and what makes them so obviously male. Not only in their sexual targets, but how they view their own sexualities.
It’s such a heterosexual male interpretation of reality projected onto the whole of society. In which females are always “desired”, in which males who want to be desired become women, lesser, objects with no will, and exist only to be acted upon.
A heterosexual couple that mutually desire one another must become female and male simultaneously - what you would logically conclude if you weren’t a mentally stunted moid who was incapable of decoupling femaleness/“femininity” with “object of desire”.
This philosophy makes no sense when you account for hetero women (and homosexual men) having separate targets of desire (males). Or even lesbians, who cannot participate in this dynamic since there is no male perspective involved and the whole system fails to launch.
I can’t believe leftists/liberals just let a bunch of moids essentially blather on about their chimp-like sexualities and accept it as progressive because they use college-educated words to explain it. Actually I can, most men are like this and enough are on the left.
No. 2575377
>>2575343Troons cannot explain women who actively desire moids. 1 fucking fujoshi is enough to throw a wrench into this entire operation.
How does this troon explain a female being lustful of her own volition? How does this troon explain how her object of desire is unmistakably and deliberately male?
This whole fixation on power dynamics and hierarchies is so inextricably male. It’s so ironic that these are the moids who claim to be women. They are the most manly male brained men who ever maled at maletown.
No. 2575694
>>2575343nta but the fact that andrea long chu still somehow gets shilled and allowed to write pieces for major corporations is proof that gender ideology is just a men's rights movement. when's the last time a tif 'academic' reached anywhere near the same level of fame as andrea? how many famous tif writers and public figures can you name? how about any tifs in public office like sarah mcbride? it's all about men at the end of the day.
>>2575665nonnie you should post this in the punk cringe thread too kekkk
No. 2575758
File: 1750673579207.jpg (Spoiler Image,2.07 MB, 2604x2912, valid.jpg)

fuck it i need to get this out of my system. thought i should make more trans-inclusive art what do you guys think
No. 2575838
File: 1750683095561.jpeg (324.99 KB, 1280x1280, IMG_9990.jpeg)

>>2575816Purely anecdotal but my TIM brother is about 6’4 and thinks he passes. I remember reading theories about tall, lanky phenotypes being over represented in autistic populations so that probably has something to do with it as well.
I filled out picrel for my brother I hope some
nonny enjoys it
No. 2575839
>>2575665All troonism is just a very honest portrayal of chimp moid sexuality.
Women are objects to be had, other moids are your competition/enemies. That’s the gist of it. Then you mix it all up with a bunch of flowery language and start falsely applying this framework to everyone else- now it’s “queer theory”.
No. 2575853
File: 1750684345508.png (222.06 KB, 499x281, IMG_9718.png)

>>2575838>bro is a tranny and a furryI’m so sorry nona I hope your parents don’t coddle him.
No. 2575946
File: 1750689483927.jpg (127.48 KB, 2048x1536, troon flag.jpg)

>>2575007That flag really does represent the troon movement perfectly, just not in the way they intended.
No. 2576088
I’m in a discord server for a stereotypically feminine interest and there’s this one TIM who keeps trying wayy too hard to relate to the women in it. But like a third of the women are TIFs so every time he posts something along the lines of “oh em gee just girly things amirite fellow gurlz??” all the TIFs come down hard on him saying that “boys like X interest too!” and he slinks off. It’s hilarious.
>>2575956Everyone I know who was actually gnc as a child either never identified as trans or only very briefly dipped their toes in and quickly desisted. At the same time, the TIFs I knew as children all claim they knew they were boys on the inside from age 2, but were in fact very gender conforming girls who wanted to be Disney princesses and only liked cute pink Pokémon. Reading their historical revisionism of their own childhood is wild. “I never played with other girls, I only ever roughhoused with the boys!” Ma’am you had a Disney princess birthday party every year for five years in a row and tried to disinvite me after the first one because my party dress wasn’t sufficiently frilly enough. “I’ve never been girly” my ass.
I think being actually gnc requires a resilience and sense of personal identity that TIFs lack. Instead they just go along with what their friends are doing and do whatever they think will improve their standing in the group and get them positive attention. When they were 6 this meant having the frilliest princess party dress, and now that they’re in their late 20’s and early 30’s with all-gendie friend groups it means being the mascest brodudeking with the most heckin’ pubebeard and the gnarliest mastectomy scars.
No. 2576242
>>2576175nta but they can affect the system for a long time even if they don't literally 'stay in your system' since they change your entire hormonal balance. It can take years to get your periods back after stopping a course of bc, and in some cases they will never go back to normal. If you recognize that TIMs taking birth control hormones permanently change their bodies, not sure why you think it would not potentially cause permanent or long-term changes for women.
>>2576088>I think being actually gnc requires a resilience and sense of personal identity that TIFs lack. I agree and most of the TIFs I knew since childhood were always stereotypically feminine girls too, but more than that, were wallflowers with a pack mentality who did everything their friends did. Not one of the girls I know from my youth who trooned out was any kind of individualist.
No. 2576347
>>2576276Most of the hormones in bc (the progestins specifically) are synthetic and typically derived from androgens. The pill is not 'estrogen only' and yes it does mess with the woman's body and natural cycle. Does it mess with women as much as it probably messes with men? No, but the idea that it wouldn't have long-lasting effects to put synthetic hormones in your body as a woman because they 'flush out' or something is silly because you can see that moids do have long term effects from taking synthetic hormones. Of course women do too.
>>2576314Yeah I've only known one troon who tried to be stealth and it was an HSTS moid. I've never seen a group of people so invested in wearing literal tags on the clothing telling people their identity kek.
No. 2576352
>>2575956>>2576088Facts, I have never met a TIF into guns or hunting or sports. Or computing, modding, speed-running, etc the way TIMs are. All of the TIFs I knew were really into fandom and fanfiction or Steven Universe Hazbin Hotel shit.
>resilience and sense of personal identity that TIFs lackI actually think they are more feminine on average compared to normal women because of this. Beyond hobbies TIFs are very thin-skinned, sensitive to social discourse, focus internally on feelings, etc. Compare how TIMs scream about "girldick" and constant gross fetish shit, barge into female-dominated spaces, and try to manipulate lesbians into sex (without seemingly caring about how the woman feels) vs how TIFs whine about not feeling desired and cry over gay men being rude to them.
No. 2576525
File: 1750718661099.png (32.47 KB, 920x242, 1750645723696.png)

>>2575343>>2575370there is actually a whole subreddit shared by incel and incel transbians who also claim that women can't possibly be attracted to men, these moids spend their entire lives as ugly degenerates and think it's part of the human condition
No. 2576553
File: 1750720064044.jpg (582.26 KB, 918x3831, 10738273.JPG)

>moid wants to date lesbians
>comments are tims hinting at trooning out
And handmaidens will still pressure lesbians to treat them as genuine women
No. 2576753
>>2576567>>2576611Oh, they exist… there were quite a few posted in the mtf threads on /snow/. They're hideous and somehow lower effort than the fag sissification fetish troons who pretend all women dress like whores.
>>2576644It's a man who basically keeps dressing mannish and "masc" but will accessorize with long hair and "femme" things like jewelry or collars (yuck). They want to look like "butch lesbians" in an attempt to draw in "femmes".
>>2576540I support you and your little FAS darling. Bottoms up!
Actually, if you drink enough vodka, would it end up killing the baby or only deform it? I'm really interested in future studies comparing the effects of hrt on fetuses vs the effects of alcohol. The theory that it affects the future child's egg/sperm rather than the child itself is really interesting to me.
No. 2576822
>>2576540I think those anons were saying that it's not good to overly restrict what pregnant mothers are allowed to do, because it becomes a slippery slope. At least that's how I interpreted it. I do think it's a travesty that TIFs taking testosterone are getting pregnant because they're probably fucking up their children's and grandchildren's lives, but I also wouldn't want to introduce laws or more social shaming to control pregnant women's behavior more. That can eventually be used to prosecute women legally for just breathing wrong while pregnant so I think it's better to go to the source and try to get medical transition banned rather than ban pregnant women taking certain hormones or substances or eating certain things. If doctors weren't handing out T like candy to vulnerable women and girls, this wouldn't be an issue in the first place.
>>2576553This is all just cope because lesbians will never date or be attracted to TIMs either. It's just going to be the same 'lame' bi girls the moid was capable of dating before, except worse because bi women are far more likely to date a normal man than a TIM, and lesbian-larping straight women.
>>2576618Kek I once talked a friend (who is a singer) out of trooning out by asking her if she would be fine losing her voice. She was like 'oh wait I never thought of that, that would really bother me.' She would have sounded really stupid too because she had an extremely high-pitched soft cute squeaky voice, which would have sounded hilarious as a frog voice, like a teenage moid who inhaled helium.
>>2576753>The theory that it affects the future child's egg/sperm rather than the child itself is really interesting to me.It would almost certainly do both. Having high testosterone levels while pregnant probably causes developmental issues for the child itself, but is also likely to affect their eggs.
No. 2577051
>>2576753>The theory that it affects the future child's egg/sperm rather than the child itself is really interesting to me.This, or rather the fact that it affects
both the fetus and the fetus’ germline, is true for anything that seriously affects the developing fetus, especially something like smoking. If your grandmother (and especially your maternal grandmother) smoked or inhaled a lot of secondhand smoke during her pregnancy with your parent, that’s now part of your DNA.
>>2576822>That can eventually be used to prosecute women legally for just breathing wrong while pregnant so I think it's better to go to the source and try to get medical transition bannedAgreed. Woman-hating pronatalist nutters are already throwing women in jail for “endangering their baby” even when it turns out the woman’s not even pregnant, and this is not something feminist should encourage. What we can do is advocate for the banning of universally harmful shit like cross-sex hormones and especially pharmacy-aided testosterone-poisoning of women and girls, smoking, microplastics etc. These things fuck up men and their germlines too, so it makes no sense to only police women.
No. 2577073
>>2577051>throwing women in jail for “endangering their baby” even when it turns out the woman’s not even pregnantWait what, OT I know but do you have a link? Not that this would especially surprise me but I never heard of that.
I'm generally libertarian when it comes to what people can decide to do to their bodies (smoking, drinking, risky behavior like extreme sports, choosing not to wear seatbelts in cars etc) but I think there's a strong precedent for stopping things at the source when it comes to prescription drugs/medications being prescribed that don't even treat a real medical issue, same with unnecessary surgeries. There is no reason why doctors who swore the Hippocratic oath and are paid - in many cases, public money or insurance money that other people pay into - to help treat/prevent illnesses should be pressured (or, honestly, even allowed, but especially pressured which is what current medical association "best practices" do) to prescribe people dangerous/controlled medications just for shits and giggles, which is really what prescribing cross-sex hormones is. If people want to go through back channels to procure roids, T, whatever, that's their risk to take, but a woman waltzing into a doctor's office and saying 'I want to look like a man so give me testosterone' and then getting it because she might feel sad if she doesn't get it is horrible medical practice and I hope all these medical associations, WPATH etc. get sued for billions for it soon.
I can't just walk into a doctor's office and ask for codeine (even if I really am experiencing actual severe pain!) and just get it handed to me, because it has a risk of addiction which doctors have deemed generally more risky than crippling pain. If I had severe painful cystic acne and wanted to get Accutane I'd have to do multiple pregnancy tests in a lab first to prove that I'm not pregnant, go on two forms of birth control and sign waivers explaining that I know if I get pregnant the baby will likely have birth defects and a doctor would encourage me to get an abortion if I somehow got pregnant on Accutane. But I can walk into a doctor's office one time and get a prescription for testosterone a week later because 'I don't like how I look and my body is distressing me' or 'I like blue and cars and I don't like skirts' and they wouldn't even warn me about risks to potential babies, let alone make me go through a bunch of tests to prove I'm not pregnant and put me on multiple forms of birth control. And it's not even treating any health issues or preventing them. What makes things worse like an anon said above is that Tgel transfers to other people via touch, so women who take it aren't just endangering themselves and their offspring and their offspring's offspring, they are also endangering random people in public who touch the same door knob as them or sit on the same bus seat or brush against them in the street, and especially people they see and touch regularly. They could be giving random women around them PCOS or other hormonal conditions without that person ever knowing or suspecting anything. The fact that doctors are allowed to be insanely irresponsible with this one class of drugs and surgeries that aren't even a treatment for anything and with the people who take them rarely being informed of the true risks, and will go so far as to guilt trip or even legally override parents who want to block their children from getting them, is truly insanity.
I know it's common for GC women and radfems to say 'I wouldn't want to make transition illegal' or 'do what you want once you're an adult' but even that makes no sense to me. Sure if some troon gets bathtub estrogen or T through some dubiously legal websites they shouldn't be punished or prosecuted for taking the drugs, but in no way should the medical industry be complicit in harming people like this, especially when it can affect other unsuspecting people who haven't consented. There has been a slow creep over the last half-century of pharma companies and medical associations pushing more and more 'medicine' that isn't for the purpose of treating or preventing any actual illnesses and I think we should all as a society stop taking this for granted and considering it normal. Yes I also believe this about non-corrective cosmetic plastic surgery but I know that might be a hot take on lolcow. At least with PS they're only hurting themselves and they usually (unless they're troons) have to pay out-of-pocket for it though.
No. 2577193
File: 1750768089055.jpeg (400.76 KB, 2200x1467, IMG_8345.jpeg)

they were interviewing a tif in a paper i read (about some imaginary victim shit) and they showed her bedroon.
it's alost scary how identical they all are. how the fuck are they all so similar? are they fucking pod people?
No. 2577346
File: 1750777707336.jpg (81.69 KB, 600x600, bannedbooks.jpg)

Removing an explicit book from the children's section of the library is not the same as banning a book from publication. Teaching children that they have a internal gender soul is religion being taught in schools.
The "read banned books" crowd only endorses reading cutesy books about gender or being gay. Reading banned books isn't cool when it's Irreversible Damage or Mein Kampf or The Turner Diaries or anything actually socially controversial. Most progressives who go on about banned books have the exact opposite core viewpoint and want to ban and censor anything they dislike.
No. 2577368
>>2577193It's a cute bedroom from the layout I see, but the decor is wild. How many pride flags do you need? And the tranny flag is always the largest (and always unironed)
They have no personality outside of twt and tiktok
No. 2577893
File: 1750805000762.jpg (239.79 KB, 1920x1510, milgram-experiment1.jpg)

I realized something today: the parents of "trans kids" are engaging in a real-life version of the Milgram Experiment. If you're unfamiliar, the Milgram Experiment is meant to test subservience to authority. Basically, the test subject is ordered by a seemingly authoritative figure to deliver increasingly high electric shocks to someone they don't realize is an actor who isn't actually being shocked. The experiment found that the majority of participants would listen to orders even as the voltage increased to lethal amounts and the actors screamed in (what appeared to be) pain. What it basically demonstrated is that the average normie is shockingly willing to listen to authority figures (in this case, scientists) even if it can be plainly observed that the orders are harmful or unethical.
I see a similar level of deference to "scientific authority" with non-MBP parents of "trans kids." They give their gay and/or autistic kids drugs that damage their bones and lower their IQs because ill-informed or ideologically captured doctors tell them to, persisting with the treatment even when it does not produce an appreciable improvement in mental health for their child. Scientist Man told them, you see, so it must be Moral and Safe. They don't account for the possibility of activist influence, publication bias, or how profitable lifelong captive customers are for pharma companies. Look, I generally trust medical science, but it's not perfect, especially when it comes to psychiatric medicine. There used to be "scientific consensus" that lobotomy was safe and ethical, too. If you're a parent who constantly gets fed emotional blackmail by medical professionals who should know better, you're probably convinced that whatever harm you're doing to your kid is "okay" so long as it "prevents" suicide (even though there's no evidence it actually does).
My advice to anons is to trust your own judgement and not to blindly follow those presented as "authorities," although I doubt anyone here needs to be told that. You don't become GC or a radfem if you're the type of person who blindly obeys.
No. 2577902
File: 1750805490282.jpeg (Spoiler Image,826.55 KB, 2099x2704, 32139B35-AC2A-413C-A836-1B4D4E…)

Sage for a 7 year old post, but do they really think women have no culture? I wish I could say I highly doubt any real woman told him women have no culture, but there’s plenty of handmaidens that have no knowledge about women’s history.
It just goes to show how shallow troon’s understandings of womanhood are.
No. 2577903
>>2577346>Reading banned books isn't cool when it's Irreversible Damage or Mein KampfI've only heard it in passing and I literally thought it was people saying they read mein kampf and similar lmao
But yeah if reading banned books is cool and you recognize books get unfairly banned based on false notions; then also read the books your trans friends burn and ban.
No. 2577965
>>2577266I don't think so but you should try to make one, nonna. There's so much good material out there since they have such a specific and conformist way of consooming and decorating. TIMs always seem to have dirty hoarder goon caves full of plastic anime crap while TIFs always have the wall of plushies, cutesy cactus/bug/dinosaur related art and tons of flags/affirmation posters. Both TIFs and TIMs seem to lack proper furniture and spend their money on figurines and plushies and comic books instead.
>>2577346Yeah it's extremely ironic that they actually try to get speech banned or introduce compelled speech laws, attempt to attack/boycott popular appropriate books and games like Harry Potter, but then whine about books being banned when it's just taking pornographic grooming materials out of elementary and middle school libraries. Those books can still be bought and read, and if they want to indoctrinate their own children into gender theory they're still allowed, but they want to forcibly expose everyone else's children too, on the taxpayer's dime no less.
In Canada recently there was a controversy because most pre-2008 books were taken out of school libraries in one of the provinces, including a lot of classic lit and old children's favorites to modernize and update the collection, and liberals were all for that, mocking the parents who were against removing classic lit from school libraries. They were also all for firing tenured profs and censoring their research into gender medicine if it didn't toe the party line. But the second it's some graphic illustrated sex guide it's literal book burning nazi censorship! If TRAs didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all.
No. 2578015
File: 1750811269311.png (92.93 KB, 667x962, huuuh.png)

could hrt at puberty for a woman make her grow above 5'3"? what the fuck are they talking about, surely not, right
No. 2578021
File: 1750811334681.png (120.48 KB, 596x914, detrans fearmongering.png)

also here's some more detrans whinging. i see so much talk of 'detransitioners' now that it makes me think the trans movement is starting to collapse internally. which is based
No. 2578053
File: 1750812538158.png (115.67 KB, 681x847, whipping girl.png)

just discovered whipping girl. does anyone know more about the author?
No. 2578056
>>2578015HRT, like artificial testosterone for a woman will not make them grow. Human growth hormone has been known to make children taller. But honestly, if your child is perfectly healthy, I would highly advise against HGH from the adverse side effects alone. Better to be a healthy shortie than some cancerous, diabetic, heart disease ridden beanpole.
The best way for a child to grow taller without adverse side effects is adequate exercise, good, high protein diet, and proper sleep.
As someone who used to have a special interest in bodybuilding and studied all these performance enhancing drugs before the troon shit, I think it's fucking insane that doctors are giving women this shit.
They know it's bad, that's why they aren't giving it to scrawny incel moids.
No. 2578117
>>2578091from my experience, tifs love to see vi (hot butch lesbian/bisexual woman) as a tif. this runs the gamut from using he/him to full-on drawing her as the traditional male body with zippertit tattoos.
>>2577193>how the fuck are they all so similar? are they fucking pod people?they all come from the same places and have the same influences. once you've seen enough tifs you will form the useless, magical power of predicting their pronouns and egg crack event or whatever based purely on their pfp.