File: 1720197680881.png (623.65 KB, 571x589, Get_Milk.png)
No. 79898
File: 1720199948320.jpg (39.84 KB, 512x396, take em.JPG)
>>79897>reeeee you bootlick moids because you’re not sexually aroused by little moidlets!!Right… There’s no reasoning with kiddie lovers.
>>79889 was right. This is why you should all be banned.
No. 79905
>>79902This wouldn’t be an issue if moralfags didn’t decide to flip their shit on anyone who posts an innocuous shota post and start sperging about it relentlessly
>>79904Idc about sexualized fictional moids and I’d deck the fuck out of an irl kid moid in the face if I could, unlearn your female empathy
No. 79917
File: 1720201704906.gif (984.83 KB, 500x334, IMG_1535.gif)
shotafags get the rope
furries get the rope
poltards get the rope
troons get the rope
No. 79920
>>79912Don’t act retarded. No one was posting explicit shota either. You’re unironically getting
triggered by an anon posting a list of mangaka who have made both regular BL and shota manga
No. 79921
>>79918Can you not form your own opinions without a set of guidelines in front of you? Embarrassing
>>79916Female pedos are based, mald harder. Go pop out kids and marry an
abusive scrote with how much you seem to love defending moids
No. 79924
>>79915So you got
triggered by semantics? Did it hurt your feelings to be called a pedo? Kek
No. 79925
>>79919Using racist dogwhistles isn’t helping your case. I don’t even care about racism against moids, but you’re a hypocrite
>>79922Have any more dicks to suck left?
No. 79927
>>79924I’m just not a pedo, it’s not correct. Like I said before though, idc about female pedos and think they’re harmless (and I will hold my viewpoint until proven otherwise), so idc if I’m called one but it’s dumb. Female only spaces have gone to shit because of moralfagging and fake misandrists who claim they hate men yet are anti shota and care about male sa
victims, for example
No. 79929
>>79920I don't know what post you're even talking about, but there are nsfw shota images in the fujo thread up right now
>>>/m/397712>>>/m/397696And another shotafag was banned and had their image deleted not long ago. How many times are we going to have to have to tell you it's not just the nsfw posts that are a problem? If furries came in and started spamming typical furfag art everywhere and getting in lengthy arguments with everyone who objects to it would you argue that it should be allowed as long as it's not nsfw?
No. 79931
>>79927Perhaps you’re a newfag, but this site doesn’t subscribe to one ideology, including blackpill feminism. Since women with all sorts of views and life experiences are here, there are rules in place to avoid repetitive infights about sensitive subjects, like what’s happening now. That doesn’t make us “fake misandrists” like you said. I agree with
>>79911, and I hope farmhands become stricter with handing out bans for any and all shotafaggotry. It’s cancerous.
No. 79933
File: 1720202729106.jpg (150.93 KB, 1026x954, 1720099430653.jpg)
>>79929This is not a shota. Have your head examined.
No. 79943
>>79940Oh no how dare I wanna hurt the poor moids kek
>>79938Oh so you’re a tumblrtard, move along then
No. 79946
File: 1720203450899.jpg (Spoiler Image,615.22 KB, 909x1084, 1720104787655.jpg)
>>79941And the other picture shows a man in a sexual relationship with a very young child, unspoilered. But nooo shotafags are heckin' wholesome they never did anything wrong, moralfags are slandering them!
No. 79949
>>79944THIS. Anons don't understand how many of these bad actors are her and her fellow attention whoring discord pals kf tranny and kf tranmaiden style.
Is there anyone here in their discord? It's called Oldschool Fujoshi IIRC
No. 79958
File: 1720205426616.jpg (27.07 KB, 497x402, F2I-IwhWsBEpFGi.jpg)
I'm just going to repeat what I already said in the yaoi thread: I'm not going to moralfag against anons who are into shota or incest, but as someone who isn't into those kinks it's aggravating that the topic is frequently (and unnecessarily) steered in that direction by a handful of anons who get a kick out of being edgy and shocking. That doesn't happen with any other kink. Imagine if there were a couple of anons who constantly tried to change the topic to foot fetish stuff, and every time someone complained about it, they got berated for moralfagging or getting filtered. It's tiresome.
There are a couple of fujo anons who enjoy guro, but they don't act as obnoxiously as shotafags. They'll talk about it if it's relevant, but they don't jerk themselves off about how they're popping everyone's monocle and shocking the squares with their kink. I think that's the right approach: follow the natural flow of the conversation instead of constantly baiting people into arguing about your favorite fetish.
No. 79960
File: 1720205751313.jpg (51.44 KB, 720x479, tumblr_p0thya9Nfc1tjjzxpo1_128…)
Even as someone who frequently gets pocket bans for stupid shit, I am once again asking admins to consider banning vpns.
No. 79965
>>79958You can blame whichever retarded fujo decided to link lolcow on 4chan. That's why /fujo/ has declined so much in quality despite the threads being a LOT faster recently. I have personally seen retards over there be like
>lolcow's fujo thread is soo much better than [whatever thread they're posting in]Typically in the /a/ homo threads and /blog/. Not sure about /y/ or /cm/ since I dont use those boards
No. 79972
>>79962Most of them are normal, but two particularly loud Nitroplus vn fans don't do anything besides pick mindless infights with the others over their taste and shitpost about their edgy scrote-owning ecksdee kinks, just like the shotafags. I'm sure these are the same people. The Original Fujoshi discord uses a picture of Aoba from Dramatical Murder as its icon, and one of the other discord attention whores
>>79957 is talking about is an avid vnsperg. This second one has personalityfagged as SDchan, Nitrofag, Takujifag, Kawoshinfag, etc, are all one Rosethornfumu, creator of the slow damage butthole meme fujo anons were making fun of yesterday and alleged the owner of the discord. If you ctrl+f her handle in the /g/ friendfinder thread you can see a list of series whose fanart all these bait posts anons have been complaining about will often be accompanied by if not other vn cgs. Rance also originates from a classic vn series, and vns often contain excessively edgy content and shota, making it very likely rancefag is a vnsperg as well.
Both are active on fujochan, even claiming to know their admin, and 4chan. They've brought beef with other personalityfags from 4chan's bl circles onto here, such as antitrapfag who would sperg religiously about traps and spam moidy anti-trap memes she brought with her, so it was probably one of them who linked lolcow there too.
These two neets are blai and elai 2.0. Everyone who was there for that would know they ban evaded like no tomorrow and only left when they got bored so we're fucked, but if anons could learn to recognize their posting habits and avoid interacting with them it would help.
No. 79974
>>79957Nice, bless you for sharing
nonnie.
No. 79975
>>79957>twf when the shotafags shitting up this place end up being greasy unwashed neets from discord.This is bleak.
>>79958Yes you described it so well. Shotafags are voyeuristic freaks. If they actually enjoyed that..that's fine but instead they are getting off to trying to be as edgy as possible and shoving shota down anons throats. Definetely mental illness.
>>79962The VNfags are annoying too, and this is coming from someone who loves slow damage, i still find them annoying. Also it doesnt help that shotafags also try to derail the VNfags too and start talking about how they wished some VNcharacters to be shotas getting raped.
No. 79978
>>79977>pederasty reeeThis is hilarious considering more than two shotafags on this site got exposed for being gay men.
Are you sure you want to talk about pederasty when it's you newfag 4chan refuges and gay moids defending shota.
No. 79979
>>79977Get with the program
nonny, we defend moids here and shit on anons who deviate from how a proper woman should act
No. 79984
>>79975Imagine getting this
triggered someone said they wanted shota towa to get raped kek
No. 79986
>>79981Least cancerous pullfag.
>defending men raping boysWhen did i do that, are you schizophrenic? Is there some collective delusion all shotafags are suffering from, kek. Dont project your guilt onto others.
>>79984Take a shower you smelly beast.
No. 79989
>>79985>getting triggered by RancefagI hope it's not true for that
nonny's sake.
No. 79992
File: 1720210553324.png (20.3 KB, 934x73, rancefag btw.png)
>>79987>People claim anyone they don’t like is rancefag I am not making claims. She literally crossposts her discord messages onto LC.
No. 79998
File: 1720212188333.jpg (56.37 KB, 500x333, da14ef35.jpg)
>>79996Anon how are you in 'her' discord yet you don't even know the meaning of her name.
Eitherway for the anons who don't know i will explain. She is named rancefag because she is a fan of Rance, a protagonist from a eroge VM that's made for men.
That eroge VN seems to be a rpg game where he fucks multiple girls who look..very young.
Not surprised that shotafags also sexualise young girls too.
No. 80002
>>79999>>80001Pooty tang is a slang word for female genetalia. Thats what it means.
>>80000Enjoy the report, ban evader.
No. 80012
>Yuripedo finally shuts the fuck up for a few days>Shotafag appears with exactly the same style of posting and obsessive baitingWe can never know peace
>>79985>>79997/fujo/ was right with their clairvoyance, these people are just gooner ryonafags disguised as fujos because of their obsession with edgy nitro chiral dogshit and loudly hating the actual BL discussed in the thread. Even rancefag admitted that she only likes yaoi when it's her husbando being raped by other men when she tried sneaking into the thread and got swiftly banned. Glad to know that it's just a few schizos from a discord group running the thread to the ground, maybe there's hope for salvation.
No. 80015
File: 1720218128012.png (45.74 KB, 1016x91, rancefag on yaoi.png)
>>80012>tfw antifujos get to say I told you so nowDoes it get any worse
>Even rancefag admitted that she only likes yaoi when it's her husbando being raped by other men when she tried sneaking into the thread and got swiftly bannedThis explains why the shotafags have been saying a lot of shit like picrel
No. 80023
>>80021Blaming fujos for this is really unfair when it was me and other fujos who complained about shotafags and vn spergs to stop ruining our BL thread and came here to talk abut them. Most fujo anons can't stand them and can't even post in that thread because rance and the other obese neets are treating that thread like its their own personal discord server chat room.
Why do some of you always blame all fujos.
No. 80027
>>80023I'm a fujo but sometimes I think it should be banned as a topic because the fujo personalityfags are insufferable and have caused many infights across threads and boards. Literally just give it the k-pop treatment.
Sidenote: I like the no-porn rule here and frankly it's a little weird to have a thread about a porn genre when you can't post porn (I know it's not all porn but, come on, a lot of it is). It's a little stifling to have to talk around it and not even be able to post funny lightsaber dicks etc. I get it's popular with a lot of normal farmers but we don't
need to have it here, it feels like it doesn't belong sometimes. fujochan exists.
No. 80029
>>79977>NAMBLAYou mean the organization that was ousted from all of the LGB orgs over thirty years ago?
>how common pederasty was globallyThis is literally just your fujobrain confirmation bias. Most cultures throughout history did not practice pederasty, and it was sometimes frowned upon even in cultures where it was practiced (it was hotly debated in Greece for instance.)
>idk why you defend gay moidsIt's not "defending gay moids" to point out that you're saying things that are factually untrue, and that you dedicate 10x as much time to paranoia about gay men being pedos as you do to caring about female
victims of child sexual abuse. For someone who purports to hate men, you sure spend a lot of time worrying about male children in the context of a crime where the vast majority of the
victims are female.
Fact of the matter is, you don't give a rat's ass about CSA unless you can weaponize it against fags, trannies, or some other group you dislike.
No. 80031
File: 1720221132355.jpg (177.2 KB, 648x646, 1000012372.jpg)
>>80021Ntychan just posts her doodles in the art threads and writes essays about how much slow damage sucks or how great NTY is which caused rancefag and rosethornfumu to develop a hateboner against her
No. 80034
>>80027Oh now we're going to just ban fujo discussion and content in general? What the fuck, I don't believe for one second that you're a fujo. This sounds like a psyop antifujo agenda. Just ban shotafaggotry of all sorts, but banning fujoshi in general is too far and too retarded.
>fujochan existsHardly anyone fucking talks there. It hardly exists as a viable option.
No. 80047
>>80028Listen Rancefag both you and Nty are cows and no one gives a fuck about your lame drama with each other, go fight each other in discord dm's.
Both of you are shitting up multiple threads with your garbage posts that no one wants to read or see. You need to go back to 4chan or discord.
Im sure youre mental instability would be more welcomed on 4chan although i dont think the mods on 4chan would offer you the same mercy that the mods did here when you were spamming this site with your nudes. Stop ban evading, no one cares about your ancient doujins,lolì pedobait eroge for men, mid VNs or your shota incest obssesion.
No. 80051
File: 1720224159643.gif (1.49 MB, 500x429, 7BN9.gif)
This thread is basically just an autistic thunderdome at this point
No. 80052
>>80046Literally where? Show me where I defended pedophiles.
You're the one bragging about how you shlick it to anime children.
No. 80053
>>80044That's not what I meant to say. That poll didn't happen that long ago, and I know the nty infights started to happen somewhat recently. Ever since ntyfag learned that rosefumu is a shotafag she's been sperging about "pedos" and posting bait despite having said how based both the dadson rape backstory in no thank you is and the old man shota rape route in laughter land. It's like how she used to make Slow Damage fanart in the past.
>>80047kek you're not wrong but please stop saying I'm her
No. 80058
>>80053>obsessing this hard over ntyfag, just proving the vendetta claim rightRosethorn, rancefag, to whomever I have the pleasure of speaking, everyone but shotafags are sick of shotafags and your unfunny shitposts. Most of the infighting in the fujo thread is started by you, your own shotafagging, and your own unfunny shitposts, and it's not limited to the fujo thread either. It's not all this one specific anon you're obsessed with, moralfags, handmaidens, or anyone else you keep trying to shift the blame to to cover your own ass. No one finds your retarded inside jokes and your fetishes funny or cute. Go back.
No. 80068
>>80065>everyone talking about me is ntyfagRancefag stop, we are talking about you because you and your discord buddies are making certain threads on this site unusable and are trying too hard to be edgy like this is 4chan.
Nty seems like a cow too tbh you all are cows metaphorically and physically.
No. 80069
>>80066You are just as cringe as rancefag. You both are pedos that need to fuck off to 4chan.
Im waiting for your ban. If you want to attention whore and personalityfag then go to abother site.
No. 80070
>>80068the fuck, i wasnt even part of this infight but i was checking the BL thread and she was trying to drag whatever gay infight you filthy neets had yesterday to that thread
>>>/m/398157 .She's an obnoxious dramafag who loves to bait and infight and post her piss fetish all over the site.
No. 80071
>>80069>>80070neither of those anons, and unfortunately that first one wasn't ntyfag. you two still aren't listening the anons repeatedly telling you it's not just your pedophilia. we hate how you derail threads by proudly telling everyone you're a flaming pedo and infight for hours when told to knock it off, then you accuse everyone of being this piss spamming drama-loving ntyfag who gangstalks you across the web you've dreamed up to cope because one of you is a manic bipolar freak and the other is probably just as loony.
this is really not as personal as you think it is. I've never spoken to you outside of /fujo/, haven't even actively lurked /ot/ in a year let alone posted let alone did either on cuckchan or discord. but I'll never convince a pair of self-admitted mentally ill losers of anything so I'll stop trying and get back to my drawing.
No. 80077
Whiteknight who can't write basic English is back to shitting up Dakota's thread (same person keeps dragging Venus into the thread to derail it)
>>>/w/330766WK also has no frame of reference, since Kiki has wanted nothing more than to have babies based on her IG posts and stories, but instead she screws bums living in vans, like a true cow. But I'm not going to help derail the thread. Just ban this idiot and the problem goes away.
No. 80084
>>80079A good amount are fotm husbandos, they'll find new ones once they find a new guy to like.
Banning husbandos just because you don't like them just leads to endless picrews and "I wish I could post him but I won't, I'm too worried people will recognize me so instead of anything sexy here's vague posting about maybe a guy."
No. 80090
>>80079There are a lot of prolific posters in those threads
that I also get sick of seeing, idk why you're singling out jjk. Just be a big girl and ride it out.
No. 80093
>>80079That's such a non issue. We used to have a prolific spam of ghost and konig and nobody gave a shit. I swear that thread is attracting the most annoying newfags who want to come up with new rules all the time, as if that wasn't just a horny shitposting thread in it's inception. Every month there's someone crying about something.
>please make a different thread for ugly husbandos or monsters>no waifus, just husbandos, make your own thread>can we have a containment thread for x?>no picrews, It's spamYou know what? I don't even have a ugly husbando, I never watched jjk, and I don't like the picrews either, but it's really easy to ignore those posts and move on. Anons like you piss me off the most, you screen the thread to your own views and thinks it should suit you. The other day someone was complaining on ot over a bunch of minor non important issues about that thread too, only to admit they just started using the thread recently.
No. 80100
File: 1720276641308.png (1.54 MB, 1170x1342, stop being retarded.png)
Can you guys teach your newfag farmhands the rules because it seems like they’re confused about what’s allowed to be posted in Celebricows kek
No. 80112
>>80109We can't peer into anyone's minds to see if they coom to something, just don't allow posts like this (complete non-contributing hornypost not even discussing the game)
>>79941 to be made in general board. Coomers can come discuss the actual content of games in a normal manner on normal boards, and if they want to be degenerates, they can take it to the hidden board.
No. 80113
>>80107Agreed.
>>80106 Is playing dumb and forcefully trying to move goalposts so regular discussion gets lumped together with extremist crap and thus trying to spook other nonas into not supporting the clearly worded proposal by
>>80101.
No. 80116
>>80115I'm using it as an example specifically because she
did mention shota (yes I know the characters in the pic aren't shota)
No. 80117
>>80108>Is this a dig at the /g/ nonas kekYes. My
true and honest take is that a degeneracy general is a shit idea and they should all just be exiled.
No. 80138
>>80106Your questions are really
valid and I understand your concerns. I think everything should be allowed on fujo but "not cross the line?"
And what i mean by that. Lamento isn't furryshit, kemonomimi and a tail on a character doesn't make him a furry. Now a blvn/manga with zoophilia/beastiality tag, full of animals or sonic looking charas, should go there since furry stuff cause infighting. Same with bara focused games. A chara having extra muscles doesn't mean that he is bara. But hairy looking bara chubby characters are classified bara and if there's a tag for it, it means that it is. As long as a game or a manga/webtoon series has one of these tags, it should go to there?
School life settings or shota bait looking characters who are adults or just teens shouldn't go to there since a lot of series are school settings and in games at least one LI is younger looking/a teen?
All blvns should be allowed there but idk maybe not specify one of these bad endings?
>it was so hot when keisuke pulled out akiras intestines and turned them into a necklace posts cgThis should go to that thread for example or
>i wish we could see towa getting raped by ugly bastards!!We just want to avoid these kind of people, not anons who want to discuss about the game but anons who played the game for these scenes/fetishes.
So discussing a game that happens to have bad endings involving these tags or scenes isn't enough force everyone to go to that thread. Specifically talking about these certain endings in a fetishizing way, would obviously attract infighting. Just a look at the fujo thread will tell you.
Now of course there will be anons that will get
triggered by stuff like older dudes, priests, leg hair or bald men. Or rape, that is a fetish in majority of bl/blvn. Banning that is like banning 70% of bl. These are not degenerate enough by most people and the goal shouldn't be making the thread vanilla-only, just moving the "extremes fetishes" to thread. Fujochan has something similar.
I'm just making suggestions and explaining how this would work. In order to make a decision the best would be to make a poll so anons can vote what they want to stay and what they want to move to that thread.
Sorry for the bad English I hope I made sense.
No. 80141
>>80140No problem nona and sorry for any English mistakes! ^^
Just making some suggestions that could make things easier and fun for everyone. The fujos purpose is supposed be to stick together, so having places where nonas can get together without bothering others and have their fun should work and have most satisfied? Obviously not everyone will be happy about it but if it works for majority would be nice.
Mods or someone could start up polls there where we could vote what stays and whats not. And if a tags has x number votes it stays or goes there. Something like that.
No. 80142
>>80121>Which one are you suggesting be banned?Are you being obtuse on purpose? The low effort fetish shitposts like
>>79941 that are always related to edgefag kinks
No. 80148
>>80138Ayrt thanks for taking the time to address each of my concerns. I can see what you mean, but I still hesitate on this solution. I completely second the separation of bara and furry for the BL thread, since it's commonly accepted among fujoshi that BL is different from bara and furry. But I don't agree that these posts where anonas express how sexy or hot they found a particular scene, be it "degen" or not, are always bait nor don't belong in the fujo thread. Of course I mostly enjoy actual, substance-based discussion of BL manga and games, but sometimes fujos do find some (extreme or not) fetishes hot. Is that not compatible with being a fujoshi? Are they wrong for finding a male ryona scene sexy? BL is mostly a NSFW genre at its core. Should fujoshi using the thread render themselves asexual in order to share in this R18 hobby? Even BLVNs, while most of them do have beautiful and thoughtful stories, also have a collection of as many different fetishes as possible. Is it a mistake to talk about these aspects too?
What I'm saying is, separating discussion of sexual aspects from being a fan of BL is like trying to separate your body from your soul. Being able to discuss BLVNs but not the scenes/bad ends where "extreme" fetishes are present also stifles freedom of discussion, and if I try to picture it, would make myself feel censored when trying to share my honest thoughts on a story. It's all akin to being on Tiktok. If no one is breaking any rules, can't we all just be adults and ignore the hornyposts we don't agree with and carry on with the discussions that we really want to have?
No. 80150
>>80138This is going to sound hostile and I don't mean it that way but you should just go back to fujochan, you are way to into this whole topic and your suggestions are asking for way too much work from the farmhands. None of this is going to happen.
>>80141>emojiOk, so you are not a regular here. Got it. All this is not what lolcow.farm is for. This whole discussion is actually just making the topic more annoying, I'm unironically more in favor of just banning fujoposting altogether (I don't think the mods will actually do that.) The annoying posters would probably find a new way to be annoying (like infecting the retarded husbando hornyposting thread) or move to fujochan but whatever.
No. 80151
>>80148It would probably just be like animated bl where the stories are all just short nonsense fluff.
Frankly, isn't it just tiring trying to restructure stuff so you can only get what you like?
I'm not sure, I just think no matter what way to try to slice the degen part out, you're cutting into a lot of bl. I wouldn't be surprised that if it did happen the normal bl thread would be slowly abandoned and people would just post in the degen thread instead regardless if what they're talking about, like what happened with the husbando threads.
>>80150Banning fujoposting seems pretty dumb unless you really just ban anything to do with men and anime.
No. 80161
>>80148Are you willingly being obtuse? Fujoshi are not a hivemind. A fujoshi is a person, she can like anything from the most sanitized vanilla to the most demented shit, but other fujos are not obligated to listen to her or share her passion if she's an extreme degenerate that doesn't understand boundaries. Fujos only share the interest in m/m relationships, being a fujo doesn't mean signing up for extreme kinks like gore, piss/scat, choking, body mutilation, amputation etc. Shota is kinda a gray area because some people may just jokingly call characters like Rin from tnc shota and I think most fujos don't care at all about it, but others will lust after literally prepubescent looking characters which unnerves most people, and failure to realize why other fujos are disturbed by the latter shows that the shotafags posting lately are out of touch with reality.
Anyway,
>>80101 and
>>80138 summarized things well. I don't think every single of the proposals need to be implemented (like all the polls), but it'd be a step in the right direction.
No. 80171
kek i predicted a long time ago that bl would be blanket banned (or at least called into question) after shota. and ofc after they ban bl (if they do) they'll probably continue to give in to whiny complainerfags and ban uh, i dunno. ryona. imagine if mods banned the complainerfags on the onset of their whining instead of anons who are just posting normally though, that'd be sweet.
>>80065permabanning doesn't do anything though
t. permabanned
No. 80180
>>80179I deleted my post because of
>>80178I'm not a ban evader or a personality fag, I just found it to be an interesting revelation.
No. 80184
File: 1720297139643.jpeg (704.62 KB, 828x1523, IMG_4490.jpeg)
Leaving the """"wholesome""" furfag thread stay really has opened the floodgates to all kinds of degenerates posting openly on /m/.
mods please take action before /m/ gets ruined
No. 80191
>>80190Because there isn't a wholesome way to enjoy content made for pedophiles but you can like anthro pics of animals without being a degenerate. Don't be retarded
nonny.
No. 80194
>>80190the shota one comes on the heel of a heated infight about shota. it was clearly a bait thread using the same wording as the furry one bc we have some degens on here who keep trying to argue that their fetish should be allowed.
i have no idea why the furfag thread is still open though.
mods really shouldn't let furfags proliferate there, once they get too comfortable they spread their shit everywhere.
No. 80198
>>80193Kek
Anons, when you hear the term "anthropomorphic animals," what kinds of images does that conjure up in your mind? And when someone refers to themselves as an anthropomorphic animal enjoyer, do you think anything else about that person or do you think "aww that's so wholesome"?
No. 80211
>>80210I didn't call furry porn at any moment, you did. I simply said furry has always been associated with
sexual cartoons.
No. 80242
File: 1720302320315.jpeg (56.44 KB, 1280x932, me-watching-two-of-my-allies-f…)
>this thread rn
No. 80244
File: 1720302409887.jpg (61.62 KB, 640x480, 362177.jpg)
>>80242lol. More like picrel though
No. 80253
File: 1720315671911.jpeg (71.15 KB, 600x888, 1649698972230.jpeg)
This is exactly what I was complaining about, what the fuck is wrong with anons atm.
I cannot imagine getting this mad over figments of imagination and I hate shotafags but anons arguing with them are just as bad just fucking report and don't take the bait
No. 80265
>>80262Yeah it's weird. Like who cares. Where's the furry porn spam? Where are all the furries sperging about getting knotted? Is it shotafags like
>>80249 deflecting? No one has any strong feelings about the thread but that one anon, who wants to rebrand it using a euphemism for furries mind you, which shouldn't be allowed either if furries were to get banned kek imagine:
>mods cave, ban furfagging to appease this lone autist chimping for a month+ over a non-issue>she tries to make her furry euphemism thread>gets banned for being a furry>chimps for another month about peter rabbit not being a furryAt the end of the day this anon is malding about ironic use of the word furry and making herself sound like a real furry in the closet in the process
No. 80269
File: 1720358252758.gif (461.91 KB, 500x368, tumblr_lm87rh47zU1qad04no1_500…)
CP on /ot/, bumping off front page. Please take it down quickly farmhands.
No. 80287
Is there any farmhand awake or even active?
There is a ban evader sperg in the confessions thread aiding to cowtipping and infighting with all the anons basically.
The threads a mess.
Also suggestion but think about implementing a ip rangeban.
>>>/ot/2081279 No. 80302
>>80297You are dumb if you think the posters you don't like will stop posting because you moved threads to different boards
>lolcow being a women only, feminist siteIt's always people like you.
No. 80314
File: 1720503362887.png (148.61 KB, 720x1209, Screenshot_20240709-003053~2.p…)
It's doing that thing where it says I'm banned but then I click it and it says "you do not appear to be banned" and redirects me to farmcow.lol, i already cleared site data so idk wtf I'm supposed to do.
No. 80317
>>80315Its the infighting /ot/ newfags trying to migrate to /m/
That thread is literally no different from the already existing characters/media you hate threads but lumped into one retard magnet thread
No. 80334
File: 1720547398081.jpeg (120.64 KB, 750x947, 873CF70C-0D6A-4275-A759-BF0C4B…)
So the top post is fine and it’s a-ok to call bisexuals inferior in an obvious bait post, but if it gets flipped around, only then does the ban hammer come out?
No. 80340
>>80334If the order was reversed, the reply probably would have received a bait ban as well. The problem isn't the fantasy, it's the fact that the reply is trying to start a fight by pointing out some perceived hypocrisy. The first post
could be bait but is also very plausibly a real fantasy (and if you lurk here at all you know that many lesbians and bisexuals have weird things for each other)
>they're calling bisexuals INFERIOR!!!Learn to read. She says wants to be served
as if she were superior for being a lesbian, which implies that she doesn't think thats actually the case.
t. Proud bihet. I truly don't know why so many bi women have such a complex about it. I very much enjoy being able to be perceived as straight, and you should too. These hysterics over literally nothing are why people think most self-proclaimed bi women are just attention seekers.
No. 80346
>>80340The first one was obviously bait, you are retarded. Literally mocking bisexuals right to our faces and we’re just expected to silently accept it or else we get banned? If some bihet posted a lesbian breaking fantasy I’m sure that would get rightfully flagged as bait, but when it’s instead degrading bisexual women that’s totally fine and even seen as so normal and acceptable that people doubt it’s even bait. Fuck off.
Not to mention, as if there was any doubt about the intention and effect, in swooped in these retards to continue the bait
>>80323>>80325>>80322>>80328Oh and lastly, no one brought up “being glad to be seen as straight” or any of that nonsense, you are pulling actual shit directly from your ass. The response was directly to a post calling bi women inferior (“reading comprehension” check: if one party is called “superior”, what does that make the other party?)
(dragging infights to /meta/) No. 80353
File: 1720563950001.jpeg (66.46 KB, 393x570, 5713216E-53F3-4548-A475-FA21E4…)
Anons walks in and makes a schizo unprovable accusation complete with things that never happened and gets to go on their merry way, but anyone responding to say
>you’re retarded, where is any of that happening
gets banned for derail? Whatever farmhand is monitoring this thread is seriously biased and isn’t even trying to hide it kek
No. 80364
>>80350>waaah wah how dare you not like pitbulls ypu psycho>immediately starts shitting on catsJust hide the thread retard.
>>80361She secretly links a certain race of dog to a certain race of moid, therefore criticising that dog race is racism kek.
No. 80365
>>80363Whining about "false" biphobic stereotypes when you couldn't be a better poster girl for bisexuals acting like they're perpetual
victims kek. Even turning on your own for having ~
problematic~ fantasies because anything that isn't heckin' wholesome has to be evil lesbian bait. It's obvious why you don't also police the male fantasies thread this hard. Interesting how you didn't take issue with the lack of redtexts given for the bisexuals that were talking about men though.
(infighting) No. 80366
>>80365>silently tolerate being called a slut and a whore or else you are acting like a "perpetual victim"makes sense. The consensus seems to be that it's okay to call bisexuals any degrading thing in the book and if they take issue with that (the nerve!!!) then you can just switch into the next phase of harassment which is all about "Oh so you think you're a
victim? this is why everyone hates you". Absolute insanity.
No. 80382
>>80381Nta, but good for you? I don't like dogs either, but who fucking cares? I really don't see the point of going into these hate threads and complaining about people hating something when it's this specific like hating dogs. You don't hate dogs? Cool. Fuck off. You do? Then post in the thread.
Going out of your way to be condescending little shits about it should make you auto-banned.
No. 80384
File: 1720639544181.png (683.2 KB, 814x601, the absolute state of the huma…)
>>80383How is seeing inbred man-made mutants like pic-related (courtesy of
>>>/ot/1166255 ) mental illness? Actually keeping such a creature around shows that the owner belongs in the loony bin.
(dragging infights to /meta/) No. 80391
>>80388i'm starting to think that janny is more of a tom fangirl, rather than taylor's lol
funny how she's back to banning posts critising tom specifically lol. sure, the saged posts were not particularly milky but calling out his moidness and complete lack of skills when dealing with his own child is not a "nitpick" lol especially when taylor tries to constantly push this narrative of him helping her with childcare and cooking, even though it's obvious he's not doing either of those.
No. 80416
File: 1720719101186.png (64.92 KB, 704x231, m - Lolcow's most hated media …)
Really not trying to reignite the shotafag debate itt, but can farmhands please crackdown on the shotafag personalityfags that plague /m/ and brag about their relentless baiting?
No. 80442
>>80441>jeremy poster?
That blackpill "everyone is a cocksucker/cockbreath" sperg with the weird autocorrect typos? She's been around since last year unfortunately but used to stay contained in /2X/
No. 80445
File: 1720742092637.png (1.58 MB, 1170x1286, what do you do.png)
Can I ask why you guys locked this thread? It doesn’t look like anyone was banned and there’s also no post from a farmhand or the admin explaining why this thread shouldn’t be open
No. 80462
>>80460nta but that thread was only made because when shaymin broke the site then tried reverting it back the original, many anons couldn't access it, so that thread was for the handful who could. since all of that is over the thread is pointless now.
also i feel like this thread
>>>/ot/1817934 kind of already discusses /ot/ and the site in general
No. 80481
I think
>>>/ot/2086164 was posted by that baiting Indian moid
No. 80492
File: 1720850753665.jpeg (469.63 KB, 821x863, IMG_4541.jpeg)
Mentioning your phobia of dogs in the dog hate thread is tumblrfagging now?
No. 80496
>>80492kek
nonny just click hide images
No. 80498
>>80492Honestly the nerve of you to complain about this here. You curate your own online experience, including hiding threads if they "
trigger" you. What do you even expect anons to do? This is like going into a cow thread and complaining that others post caps.
No. 80501
>>80500Nta but most users know moids took over the discord. No actual women want to be in there and it got raided a bunch of times. Normal farmers don't give a fuck about the discord and it hasn't been relevant for like 3 years. 4 even. There weren't even that many people in it while the site alone gets something like 10k visits a day the hellweek thing said? So 90% moids and barely anyone in it and 10 people active only ever.
The discord was fucking trash.
No. 80507
>>80505When you give an invite it shows up in discord logs so nona will get nuked
>>80506Sounds like a mod or ex mod in touch with older current mod
No. 80508
>>80507So it's fake. Got it.
As if the mod team having a private discord is a bad thing at all. They should have a personal area without farmers to interact and communicate. Doing it all through email or something is so unorganized when there are other ways to communicate like Discord.
No. 80523
>>80521If you’re the eurodivergent scrote that was shitting up that thread: kys
If not: we’ll survive with the thread being locked temporarily until he gets bored and leaves
No. 80525
>>80521I can understand why they don’t want to deal
With the flooding kek
No. 80534
File: 1720920572784.jpg (107.81 KB, 736x1108, 1000001571.jpg)
>>80532Nyart, but I'm here to protect you
No. 80545
File: 1720922232445.jpeg (525.47 KB, 828x552, 14420A6A-7D96-4749-A336-CE69A9…)
Farmhands locked the thread right before I could post my masterpiece…. >>2088535
>mfw
No. 80548
aaaaaaand the beautiful new thread is locked. Sorry amerifags, we tried to bring Alfred back
>>80546kek!
No. 80560
File: 1720923019519.jpeg (237.34 KB, 736x981, IMG_1729.jpeg)
>>80557They could’ve done it without locking the thread. Can’t even have real time discussion on an important historical topic about our country. GOD BLESS AMERICA GOD BLESS OUR SOLDIERS GOD BLESS OUR HVAC SYSTEMS EUROPOORS COULD NEVER COMPREHEND
No. 80563
File: 1720923457443.png (62.66 KB, 901x277, 2c1a3d9.png)
let us shitpost this is a historical moment
No. 80573
>>80571Anons are allowed to disagree if it doesn't turn into an infight with namecalling and bad faith arguments. That thread always served as a thread for meta discussions about cows and their fans and haters that would otherwise be rule breaking on the cow boards. We're not going to make every thread into gioyc 2.0 because anons can't handle being disagreed with.
The reason why talking about Addy gets a lot of replies is because she's a fresh cow and a lot of eyes are looking at the thread, it should be expected.
No. 80574
>>80573Oh okay, but it just seems like one anon is purposely trying to infight about it. Just a suggestion to check it out, but if it's all good then just ignore it.
>>>/ot/2089124 This is the poster I meant, but if they aren't making bad faith replies, I guess it's fine. It seems less of a personal cow opinion and more like trying to get anons to justify what they are posting.
No. 80584
File: 1720963388406.jpeg (448.04 KB, 961x583, IMG_4580.jpeg)
>>80580jannies seem pretty ok with the current /pol/ification of /ot/.
>>80578>you aren't fooling anyonelmao what are you on about? im not trying to censor anyone all i said was that i might be biased but i don't see the point of making repeated posts like picrel, ie just random social media pictures of ugly dogs with repetitive "look how evil and scary this one looks" commentary. admittedly i worded myslef badly.
No. 80586
>>80584the whole point of moderation is for mods to ban posts that break the site rules and be neutral but they can't even do that.
The moderators themselves are huge cows who will bait and infight on anon and go through a anons whole post history that they argued with to try and find a post that they could ban them for. This has led to mods banning anons for months old posts when they don't know what to currently ban them for or moderators who "accidentally" end up permabanning anons without any reason.
The moderators are extremely biased, so they are okay with the trump thread staying up even though it has brought many moids and trolls to this site in the span of a couple of hours, imagine how many more moids it will bring in a couple of days?
Lol we unironically need a moderator to moderate the moderators too because many of these mods aren't doing their job and are abusing their mod powers (probably the only time in their life they weild any type of authority)
No. 80594
>>80590I'm sorry, the
what thread??
No. 80599
>>80593Because some of us are tired of every 2nd question in the relationships thread being related to their nigel's porn addiction and it deserves its own general
Also 'we can't post anything or make certain threads because the 0.1% of weirdo moids who have a fetish for our posts might be lurking's such a stupid arbitrary reason to not make threads. 'Porn widows' is an extremely niche fetish anyway, you might as well close the domestic abuse thread then since a couple moids
might getting off to it. Fuck that.
No. 80607
>>80606the trump thread is full of unironic trump shills and "voting doesn't matter both sides bad" retards. unbearable
hibestly starting to think we should ban all politisperging if we want to keep this place readable
No. 80608
>>80606Those anons calling any thots with husbands and enjoying having a family "trad" is pretty irritating too.
>>80607 I personally love discussing politics, but the fact that mods raid it and I guarantee some of them are actual farmers just fucking around, really kills discussion. I am so tired of reaction image replies and shit.
No. 80615
>>80609>there was a huge uproar and two new threads were made in protest. The uproar was done by retards who don't even use this site and only came here to post once they saw a political thread and admitted to being 4chan, pol and kiwifruit posters.
Why the fuck do farmhands even care about their opinions when they are not even farmers, farmhands should ignore the opinions and uproar of baiting losers who add nothing to this site and instead listen to the anon farmers who are begging them lock that mess of a thread.
Farmhands please lock that thread, love you, pls lock.
No. 80617
File: 1720982144379.jpeg (115.2 KB, 1412x738, IMG_5047.jpeg)
WTF are jannies retarded or something? How does this qualify as bait? It was obviously a rhetorical question to point out how unnecessarily often Shaytards like to nitpick Shayna's weight. The lolcow opinion thread doesn't even move fast enough to be worthy of posting infight bait.(ban evasion)
No. 80619
>>80618Except the OP of the thread literally states
>However you can complain about the fanbase of the cow or the people who dislike the cow here.So my post was fair game. I'm sorry that a sensitive Shaytard ran across my post and felt called out enough that they needed to report the post KEK
No. 80623
>>80620Read the sentence again, there are two parts.
>or the people who dislike the cow here.So, not just the fanbase. Regardless, I've never been banned for giving an opinion on the users of a certain thread (and there's no explicit ban on doing so anyway), so it makes little sense to argue over a hypothetical infraction when the main complaint is that
>>80617 was mislabelled as bait. If posting about other anons was really the main issue and a cause for being banned, then that should've been written as the reason instead.
No. 80625
File: 1720986526266.gif (129.36 KB, 160x160, tumblr_ee2a8004be975b1db9f5899…)
is a 12 hour ban for responding to some european seething about circumcisions really warranted
No. 80626
>>80624Did you even read the post that you linked? They aren't complaining/opinion-ing about the Placentaverse anons, they're complaining about the jannies, which
is explicitly prohibited
>Also this is not a thread to complain about threads, bans, or mods, do that on /meta/.If you're going to simp this hard over newfag jannies, at least put in a little effort
No. 80636
File: 1721002862584.jpeg (396.92 KB, 1576x1195, 7K3GdLf.jpeg)
>>80633>>80635Literally only a few posts above (and below) the post you quoted
>>>/ot/2054612 you'll find anons doing the same thing without a redtext. You'd think nonnies would be allowed to complain in the complaints thread but the resident sycophants think that site staff can do no wrong.
No. 80640
>>80636Not that anon, but the nona saying the stuff about how the Shayna thread is particularly creepy is right.
I have a feeling there’s one or two obsessed moids/trannies in that thread. The way they write just gives off creepy perverted tranny energy.
They always posts links to and screenshots of her porn which lets face it no actual woman wants to watch or see, they talk about her body and vagina and whatever in very perverse gross ways, they’re very psychologically and verbally dehumanizing and degrading to her in a way that goes beyond just being a regular hater or vendettachan.
It’s almost like theyre getting off to her or have a sexually motivated hateboner for her, and we all know that men are often turned on by people and stuff that also disgusts them. It just screams male.
Shayna is a disgusting person who makes disgusting content and I’m not defending that at all, but the obsessive weirdo(s) in her thread are almost as much of a cow as she is. Definitely some weird sexual obsession they have with her, and it comes across very VERY male.
No. 80646
File: 1721018661053.jpg (183.63 KB, 1080x855, 1000006675.jpg)
Honestly should ban all skirby discussion, the anons are not here to act like farmers
No. 80654
>>80651Ok, here's your spoon-feeding. Also, note that in every single post they make it's "we" instead of "I".
>>51182>Hello anons, we are the new admin team! We are a team of three taking over for Shaymin. >we are a team of 3 consisting of two devs and a liaison + project manager to keep communication flowing between devs and farmers>>51219>We are admins Aimée, Jenny and Sentinel.The entire first part of this post
>>51381>>51666>Favorite normie activities? >A: alcoholism>J: alcoholism>S: alcoholism No. 80660
>>80656I think a lot of anons were either very naïve or doped up on hopium because the timeline for cerbmin's "hiring" didn't even make sense. Shaymin spent a good year trying to find a replacement admin, gave up on the search, and then started again when SHTF and she decided she didn't want to do the work anymore. Then, coincidentally she was able to find not one but
three administrators in the span of a month, all of whom knew how to code, and all of whom were female. It was incredibly suspicious and I'd been skeptical ever since. Anyone who's been here a while too (6+ years) will also know that the admin (Shaymin) is shady and known for larping as different admins so that it would seem like she had relinquished control of the website. Of course communication fell through, and
of course the website never received the update that it needed because
cerbmin is Shaymin in a trench coat KEK
No. 80663
>>80661>Having admin abilities doesn't make all of them admin in the sense that they own the site.Pure Mongolian idiocy. The fact of the matter is that admin claimed to be a team of 3. We do not know who actually owns the site. We do not know if these three people ever existed.
>>80662I assume one of the three admins took on the role of "liason + project manager" but they didn't write it out very clearly.
No. 80678
File: 1721032868232.jpg (496.44 KB, 1080x1304, Screenshot_20240715-183729_Chr…)
>>80677How is Venus's weather? Anyways thank god its over
No. 80679
>>80660Exactly this. It's still burritomin and her friends. I feel like there has been too much of the users leaving so people don't notice it as easily.
burrito claimed to want to offload it for more than six months, tried the 'shaymin' farce to get PULL x LC off the ground, then went full tard tantrum.
The sudden appearance of coding admins out of nowhere was so damn
sus but we still had so many anons eating it up. It's craziness.
No. 80680
File: 1721041454971.jpeg (400.83 KB, 1535x925, tB8mstM.jpeg)
>>80668Anything over BMI 24 is considered overweight, not sure what you're on about. It's just that many (if not most) Westerners are 24 BMI or more so people don't realize that that's technically overweight and not "healthy" (unless you've got a lot of muscle mass, of course, which most people don't). Nobody is saying Shay's specific weight in her thread when they call her "wide load" or other retarded nitpicks ad nauseam, even though she's demonstrably lost weight since her peak, so why should I? I get what you're saying, but it's not bait just because it struck a nerve with someone. But at the end of the day I don't care so much about the ban as much as I think jannies have been displaying extreme newfaggotry over the last year or two.
No. 80687
>>80679This tinfoil gets passed around every six months or so with zero evidence. The difference in competence with regards to how to site functions from a performance and technical stand point is like night day between the three of them.
Burritomin was fairly competent and was a decent admin overall. She introduced new boards and made several improvements to the site software to keep it functioning. She was also working on a long term project of moving LC to Lynxchan.
Shaymin did her best but was not competent. No hate towards her at all, I do think that she underestimated the amount of work required and didn't have any malicious intentions to harm LC. The performance of the site declined, spam and CP raids were frequent, she also failed to finish moving LC to Lynxchan because autistic speds had a nervous breakdown over the initial CSS.
Cerbmin has so far proved themselves to be competent. They have made extremely noticeable improvements to how the site performs and implemented software that blocks CP from being posted. Even though there's been no communication from them for months, they're still here and working on the site because there are changes being made to how the site performs.
No. 80695
>>80692This is trivial to what was actually promised of the admins. They said that they were working on building a new platform from scratch to transfer this website over. It's been over a year and we've seen few updates ever since. There's
three of them and two of them are software devs, I can promise you it would not take this long. The most dramatic change was when Shaymin attempted to update the website (to much backlash). Admins have not been corresponding regularly with the userbase.
>>80694Kek nowhere else on this site do you see anons going this hard in the paint over the incompetent site staff than in /meta/. If Null were as inefficient as Cerbmin the Kiwis would start a riot
No. 80696
>>80695plus the "admin(s)" claimed they'd overhaul the site and never did, never post here and have been running the site the same dumb way as shaymin did. it also explains why the dox mod didn't get removed, shaymin and her friends still run the site.
i also know remember seeing posts by an anon who was going to take the site over and was turned down by shaymin basically right before the new "team" randomly appeared. this is not tinfoil at this point.
No. 80699
>>80689I do wish there was more communication. It could just be that there's nothing new that needs to be discussed.
>>80695>They said that they were working on building a new platform from scratch to transfer this website over. It's been over a year and we've seen few updates ever sinceCoding image board software from scratch is going to take a while, especially if they are only doing it in their spare time because they have jobs and lives outside of the internet. They would also need to code an importer that would convert threads from LC's current tinyboard based software to the new software.
No. 80700
>>80699Again, there's two of them (at the least) who are capable of software/website development. It wouldn't even matter if it took them 10 years, what matters is that they're providing consistent updates and not overpromising. Sure, they may have jobs outside of the farms, but at the end of the day this is a position that they
volunteered to do, so it is their responsibility to get shit done. I'm not going to cut them any slack.
No. 80715
>>80702This would be great
Current trump thread is filled with admitted /pol/ posters that share their images on 4chan, plus kiwifarms removed registration again so the more these things are discussed it's going to bring more moids and pickmes here.
No. 80750
File: 1721328746246.png (238.02 KB, 828x428, r9k.png)
/r9k/ (4chan incel board) is advertising lc as the female /pol/, it’s over so over nonnies. Look out for scrote tourists during the next few days.
No. 80751
>>80750This is nothing new, some of the OG cows would link lc on /r9k/ to bait moids into posting here. It's just going to be exacerbated because so many newfags like
>>80719 think they're funny and edgy for posting on 4chan.
No. 80757
File: 1721341421202.jpeg (63.1 KB, 735x628, IMG_1794.jpeg)
>>80733Kekkkk do you ever wonder why people don’t like you motherfuckers? Always shutting people down on talking about the injustices your people commit on to other people. That isn’t anti-semitism this is criticism that every ethnic, racial, civil rights groups face including black people. Grow a bigger labia, shut the fuck up and learn to mind your business or better yet go make a Jewish woman circlejerk thread and stop concern trolling
(infighting) No. 80765
>>80762You’re overly sensitive and want to shut down other people’s speech because the negative behavior of your eve impacts practically everybody on this earth except your own. Palestine is even making leftists realize this fact but they’re still too scared and try to cater to every “
POC” group lmfao. Uh oh I guess it’s offensive to now state the facts that they’re killing and bombing women and children, sterilizing Ethiopian jewish women, traded black people into slavery, profit off of gang violence and hypersexuality in my communities uh oh
(bringing infights to /meta/) No. 80770
>>80750>>80760This explains a lot about all the homophobia and racebaiting that's been going on here for the past few months. It was not this bad a year or two ago.
>>80751>>80759While there's overlap between the two, I feel like it's worse to advertise us as "female /pol/" on /pol/ than it is to try to get retards from /r9k/ to brigade us. The /r9k/ speds just spam gore and porn, which is easy to delete, but the tourists from /pol/ are actively infiltrating and ruining the culture of lolcor because the current crop of farmhands refuse to ban them half of the time.
No. 80772
there may be an incel coomer defending himself in the skirby thread - that or the incel wk that was banned earlier is back at it
>>>/snow/2016502>implies an anon that doesn't feel bad for some unhinged coomer incel is skirby herself>upset at said anon for "bashing a mentally ill coomer" >somehow knows the incel coomer totally doesn't know about lolcow it wouldn't be surprising if that thread has some deranged scrotes in it, could be just some unintegrated retard but I hope farmhands look into it.
No. 80775
File: 1721369148498.jpg (394.61 KB, 1170x1530, GSpMpd3WIAAphmE.jpg)
cp in /pt/
No. 80782
File: 1721412733514.jpg (366.33 KB, 850x961, patchy my beloved.jpg)
cp in ot
No. 80808
The skirby thread has gone to absolute shit, it's being infested with blow-ins from tiktok and twitter.
>>80789 is right, how is a thread that's 1/3 redtext not being dealt with?
No. 80812
File: 1721516397535.jpg (40.17 KB, 521x296, neglect.jpg)
Firstly, I just want to say I appreciate the jannies hard work atm because it seems like you are dealing with a lot lately.
I just wanted to ask though why this is considered in the wrong thread as I think letting your puppy eat your infants fingers would be a prime example of bad parenting?
No. 80819
File: 1721560000524.jpeg (64.28 KB, 657x238, IMG_1833.jpeg)
>side comments have to be in designated containment threads
No the fuck it doesn’t you insufferable, annoying newfag moderator, no where does it state in the gd rules that “you cannot post your own quips or comments in a thread” they just love slapping bans on fucking anyone (because they are biased pieces of shit addicted to crack and being complete pathetic fatties with no lives choosing to be mods). A lot of the newfags from 2021 with too much dip on their chip have a vendetta towards most of the users. They are biased, create the infights, create threads with the most in fights, keep one of the threads with the most in
fights but decided to get rid of dumbass shit thread that was allegedly causing the same problems (when you can just simply ignore the mass reports because it’s a shitposting thread). The bootlickers find nothing wrong with these retards piss poor attempt at modding and furthermore this website goes into the toilet like the tranny jannies want. You do not have honor like a hardworking retail employee dealing with “angry entitled customers” which you probably view as this userbase, you’re a fat incompetent witch who’s powertripping as a mod on an imageboard. You have virtually no fucking life. Never ban me for this shit again and go kill yourself out of the farmhand team.
No. 80822
>>80819Another oldfag, and dogfags absolutely should be contained to their CONTAINMENT thread kek. If anyone has been here for a long time and remembers the times before the doghate thread was created/used and the dog haters were freely sperging, then you'll probably get why.
Also, taking a 2 hour ban serious to post about it in /meta/ and a-log over it screams newfag. I don't like the staff that much either, but some of the anons itt need to be honest and just admit that you take bans as personal attacks
No. 80830
>>80827Why?
>>80828Stop the cap. I know when and what time the ban was made and they are usually 6 hours. They only do those few minute/less than 6 hour bans when they come into a thread where everybody is having fun, an anon says something a little too weird and then just start banning people but they are a cool, fun mod, not a boring one!! so they only ban you for a few seconds to save face. One of the mods got removed and you’re still defending them endlessly because you use them as your personal army when you don’t like what you see on the website by mass reporting people, that’s funny as hell
No. 80833
>>80830If farmhands were giving out a ton of bans that are only a few minutes long just to pretend they're moderating, don't you think more anons would be posting about their abnormally short bans?
I specifically remember the one time (before you had to type something in the report box) I got a ban that was like a minute long just for the farmhand to say something about not reporting posts without typing a reason. This was like years ago and it wasn't even something other anons would've been able to see. Anyway, you sound genuinely crazy and I think you need to get a hobby.
No. 80859
>>80855Go cry about all posters from that thread then and tag
>>80848 get your head out of your ass. do you know where you are
No. 80860
pretend wking larping
>>>/w/332437 and using twitter
/s terms.
No. 80861
>>80859Nta, but the only one crying here is you, though.
The thread has gone to shit again. No wonder, a retard mentioned it here, now trolls flocked there.
No. 80863
File: 1721591464931.png (648.16 KB, 1079x1421, 1000047921.png)
>>80858I don't usually sperg about threads I don't like on here but that thread was made 10 hours ago and already has over 600 posts, the majority of which is infighting. The thread is literally unreadable and the front page looks like this. ONE thread is somehow getting over 50% of current site traffic.
No. 80865
>>80858And i thought the schizophrenic anon crying for help was the worst thing that could happen in this thread.
>>80737Probably BP twitterfags who are known for exactly this (lusting after teenage girls). Who knows though
No. 80869
>>80863It's weird how threads that had much less infighting were locked yet those threads that have non-stop infighting, shitposting, and general rambling for months (since like around the 3rd thread really) are allowed to continue. Like it literally doesn't stop AT ALL unlike some other threads.
>>80867There was recently someone trying to defend trannies in there and call them "based", saying they were better at destroying masculinity or something but it might be bait, idk the entire thread is like retard-on-retard action.
No. 80871
>>80820If you report any post that mentions a dog as dog hate, not only are you further legitimizing the dog hate thread you are also showing how much of a
triggered retard you are. So congrats anon.
No. 80874
>>80871If you’re posting
doghate outside of the
doghate thread (which I’m assuming that nona did) then yes I will happily report it. Don’t give a fuck if that is ruining the site for you. Boohoo.
>>80863Kek can I be honest? I’m kinda glad the personalityfag who lives in that thread sperging out over oral sex and how much she hates other women, is getting trolled. She uses that thread like a retarded diary saying the same things over and over.
No. 80876
File: 1721596128766.gif (457.17 KB, 220x164, khaled-dj-khaled.gif)
>>80874How is this
>>80812 doghate? The post was clearly about the idiot parents but thanks to you retards you've got it relabelled as doghate.
> Don’t give a fuck if that is ruining the site for you. Boohoo.Lol I didnt say that but like I say you are the wierdos spreading doghate so well done.
No. 80879
>>80877>That’s not even what I was originally replying toThis is me
>>80871you were responding to me, maybe YOU take your own advice and look at who you are responding to before calling anyone a fucking retard because its clear thats projection at this point.
No. 80880
>>80879NTA but you literally misquoted the anon you replied to in
>>80871.
>>80820 said she reports dogHATE outside of the doghate containment thread.
No. 80882
>>80881Nonna, you are the one raging here calm your tits. If you were responding to
>>80819 why respond to
>>80871, like do numbers confuse you?
>>80880Yes, and my post
>>80812 was reported as doghate when it isnt. What part are you struggling with?
No. 80885
>>80882Okay let me get this straight, I'm fucking confused. I am
>>80820. You said this
>>80871 in response to me. I was never talking about
>>80812 No. 80887
>>80885Yes, you outed yourself as someone who did what I got redtexed for(my post was not doghate but was reported) and I replied thats retarded.You assumed I was the other nonna, you could have just asked instead of running your mouth like a bitch.
>I'm fucking confused.Yes thats pretty clear, there was no need to be an ass about it.
No. 80889
>>80888You are really struggling here arnt you
>Why did you originally fucking reply to me in response to another anon?I didnt
>>80887
>And kek continue posting caps of my posts in the dog hate thread.Yes because that thread is also for retarded dogfags. I dont even hate dogs which was what my original op was about.
No. 80894
File: 1721604655385.png (12.24 KB, 1213x94, bioooo.png)
>>80892Most annoying kind of infighting
No. 80896
File: 1721613712348.jpg (22.64 KB, 1261x72, example of low IQ posting.jpg)
>>80890>I never even actually reported anybody ffs.Nonna, at least keep your story straight.
>Actual low IQ shit going on here from you.It would be if I was imitating you, you are either forgetting the post you made, are too blinded by tard rage, replied to the wrong person or really just stupid. Which is it?
No. 80897
>>80896>post 1 is a post complaining they got banned for posting about a pitbull eating a babies fingers>post 2 is a post raging they got banned for dog hate outside of the dog hate thread>i reply to post 2 saying doghate goes in the doghate containment thread and ill happily report anybody who posts doghate outside of the containment thread>i get replied to that im retarded for helping get post 1 bannedI did not, do not, and will not ever fucking care about post 1. I dont have anything to say about it, i never did, for some reason theyre getting correlated when I have had 0 to do with post 1.
You guys keep screenshotting me to put in the doghate thread as some sort of “See she is the one reporting everyone!” retarded ass gotcha attempt
No. 80898
>>80897>anons keep screenshotting me to put in the doghate threadKek holy shit what is wrong with doghate users. Also I see why
>>80812 was redtexted with wrong thread because it barely has any context related to bad parenting. Like sure you can try to connect the dots, but the actual image doesn't at all and just says the dog got relocated to another home.
No. 80900
File: 1721622087723.png (333.71 KB, 1284x1714, Screenshot 2024-07-22 at 12.16…)
Ok so the reason I put the new Shoe0nHead thread link in thread requests on /pt/ is because the previous thread was locked and wouldn’t let me post it so I was under the impression you were supposed to post new threads since other anons did the same
>>>/pt/935424 my big question is where do we put new threads if the previous one was locked? Do we just do nothing and hope they find it?
No. 80906
File: 1721653464737.gif (4.68 MB, 500x504, sure-jan-marcia-brady-sassy-c1…)
>>80897>>80898For someone not bothered about it you keep going to the doghate thead and crying about this trying to win nonnas over. Thats pretty pathetic.
No. 80914
>>80910I know this is hard for you to understand, but allowing a dog access to an infant, and that dog then chewing 5 fingers off that infant, is bad parenting.
Especially a shitbull, known for its powerful jaws.
No. 80932
The Addy users need to be reigned in. Why are anons attacking each other and accusing each other of being into petplay? The post they are replying too isn't wking Addy or anything either, it's just asking if anyone knows who the original artist is to check is Addy is scalping the pair she is selling
>>>/w/332534These users need to take their meds.
No. 80937
>>80936We know Addy bought them specifically for petplay reasons though. She even followed a petplay tumblr. Her reselling cat ears isn't milk.
>If anons can't handle the fandom/cosplay scene having names for thingsIt's literally just cat ears, it's not that deep. If you think it's so milky, don't ask anons to spoonfeed you and post it yourself.
No. 80941
>>80936>nicknaming an anon 'petplay-chan'ntayrt and I don't even read the addy thread but: I see this "nickname" accusation all the time now. This isn't seriously giving one specific anon a nickname (at least not typically). It's usually just making fun of an anon talking about some topic with the -chan suffix. Yes, sometimes it is one anon with tons of posts, like spergchan, but often it's just a little sarcastic dig at a couple posts. Like if I ranted about someone's earlobes for a couple posts, someone might call me earlobe-chan once, big deal.
idk I feel like people everywhere are collectively losing the ability to differentiate between jokes, sarcasm, and full-on accusations or infighting. Or they are newfags. Using "kek" all the time doesn't make your posts any more convincing btw.
No. 80949
>>80941Exactly this.
The whole ear thing is irrelevant and it’s been made quite clear that no one is interested in it. Even a seller came here to post screenshots and no1 curred, anon needs to take the hint.
>>80942Anon, you sound like a newfag getting this upset. You’ve come to /meta/ multiple times now to complain about normal discussion. No one is starting an infight, just reminding you that sperging about cat ears is stupid. Again, if you really think her reselling cat ears at different prices is something milky, post the screenshots yourself.
No. 80951
>>80949I can't believe we are nitpicking what people do find milky just because you don't care. A bunch of users in /ot/ don't find a lot of things about Addy milky, but that doesn't mean it's not true it is. Scalping is milky to me too, but I'm not going to go through the effort. Now we have to nitpicking who finds what milky?
>You’ve come to /meta/ multiple times now Calling others newfags yet acting like only 2 people in the whole of /w/ brings complaints about Addy's thread here isn't the nonna behavior you think it is.
>>80950Just because scalping doesn't interest you doesn't mean it's not milky to other users.
No. 80953
>>80951>Acting like only 2 peopleYour posting style is very obvious. You press “Enter” and always link to the post. You type the same too.
>Scalping is milky to me too, but I'm not going to go through the effort.Then don’t even bring it up if you’re too lazy to back up your own tinfoil?
You asked for proof comparing the original seller’s price to Addy’s reselling price. No one cares about cat ear ethics other than you. We’re still waiting for those “milky” caps, newfag. You must know too that it’s a waste of time if you won’t even bother digging for it yourself.
No. 80958
>>80951Did you even read the post of the anon you are defending?
>>>/w/332527>She's selling kemonomimi ears. I don't have time right now, but someone should check the price of themShe didn't even bring the alleged milk of scalping. If they want to talk about it, all they have to do is actually bring the caps. Saying someone should check and do it for her isn't the way it works at all and at the end of the day, it's a useless post.
No. 80960
>>80959KEK so could you, but here you are. Telling anons to take their meds, calm down, and get a grip won't make you sound more cool and detached or in the right. You come to meta to complain about an anon calling someone a petplay-chan
>>80932. If you thought that was an infight bait all you had to do was report and ignore the post. And btw, very few minutes of searching would answer the alleged milk theory, Addy isn't scalping, how exciting.
No. 80963
>>80962I looked it up and the store doesn't even have the retarded policy of scalping, even if it did their lowest price there was €95, which is currently around £80. She's selling her ears for £55, far lower than the cheapest set.
>there is no way to know if she is scalping.By your own logic, there's no scalping milk to talk about then. If there's no evidence of it, then it's just tinfoil, proving how further useless that post was, amazing.
No. 80965
>>80916Yeah, im beginning to see that now especially when they are posting shit like this
>>80910Like this is a weird cope/defence quite worried these people are out in the world.
No. 80981
File: 1721759000080.gif (478.86 KB, 220x245, IMG_1871.gif)
Booo you farmhand whores, unlock the thread it was just getting good
No. 81005
>>81002we're two different anons. I thought you said you like it when you're clockable, anyway? kek, I guess that was just cope
>>81001they're really, really dumb and can't cover their tracks believably even when they try
No. 81012
File: 1721786802709.jpg (105.05 KB, 720x829, This is literally the cow.jpg)
>>80970>>80970Take your meds, anon. I scrolled past the thread and noticed an anon complaining about another incorrect redtext. Low and behold farmhand marked it as "derailing" because they can't be fucked even reading the thread title. It's a dogshit thread, filled with zoomers, but the fact farmhands aren't even capable of reading the title of the thread their moderating (after already making this mistake) says a whole lot.
No. 81014
>>81013I don't disagree, in fact I'm glad retards are getting banned. It's just pretty sad this is the second time the same mistake has been made.
>consistent posting would've lead to consistent judging This shit never used to happen back in the day because farmhands understood the thread they were moderating. They don't even have to read further than the thread title to realise that's literally Skirby. Or refer to the first time this happened a give it 5 seconds more thought before hitting enter. I'm not saying this post was of a high quality either, but the redtext is misleading.
No. 81016
>>81001There are terminally online NEETs here who live on LC all day and so any post that reminds them of a personalityfag they don't like is enough to
trigger their schizo brain. Case in point, a window to a schizo's mind
>>>/ot/2034568>>>/ot/2034653>>>/ot/2034678I'd be laffing but the fact that the only thing they have in their lives is this website just makes it sad.
No. 81048
File: 1721847795535.png (802.31 KB, 974x525, 75r33643.png)
>>81047samefag even women in the old days got tired of this kek
No. 81054
What's up with the recent bans for minor shitposting? I'm talking about
>>>/ot/2102657 and
>>>/g/418145 when the latter is literally the husbando shitposting thread, among others. I don't want this site to become even more no fun allowed than it already is, let us enjoy ourselves.
No. 81059
File: 1721858682920.png (285.14 KB, 800x600, 1000015650.png)
like where does it say "no shitposting/no dumbass shitposting"
>>81058I bet the new farmhands don't even know how the husbando hornypost thread got created or weren't around back then
No. 81067
File: 1721866433663.jpg (24.58 KB, 348x465, 384a158d780f0a6d77069302033cd5…)
My complaint is that you can hardly post female anime characters in /m/ without someone losing their mind because it's not feminist or realistic enough or whatever.
Like I get that anime isn't everyone's cup of tea and some of it is ridiculous, but now the most benign anime things will trigger some farmers, like apparently the outfit in picrel is too coomerish.
It's /m/, people are going to post anime, don't go there if it hurts your fee fees.
No. 81070
>>81069I'm just complaining, I don't really know if there's a good solution. I might just passively aggressively link them to
>>>/m/40244 when they shit up anime threads as long as that's not a ban-worthy offense on my behalf.
No. 81073
>>81072Oof, never seen that one.
But tbh, basing likes and dislikes based off of what coomers are doing is lame.
Coomers are part of every anime fandom, including childrens' anime.
No. 81087
>>81085shut up and go lose some weight so you can wear
>>81083 picrel. only fat women care so much about hiding their muffin top in an ugly sweater
No. 81090
File: 1721884336684.jpg (3.29 MB, 4000x3000, lel.jpg)
>>81087Oh yeah? Post your fingers, pig.
>>81088>>81089Cope and seethe, failed Stacies.
(ban evasion) No. 81091
File: 1721884485188.jpg (53.77 KB, 1080x641, F9wnpntXEAAldxX.jpg)
>>81090oh hell yes. keep embarrassing yourself
No. 81093
>>81090shut up moidlet and go clip your crusty nails
>>81092that’s not a woman that’s a moid with a bad case of inuyasha nails because they’re allergic to self care
No. 81097
File: 1721885084432.jpeg (107.19 KB, 736x659, IMG_1899.jpeg)
Real Stacy outfit
No. 81100
some people
farmhands forget the orgins but i won't. I'll always remember
>>>/ot/816806>>>/ot/815773>>>/ot/816790 No. 81104
File: 1721907957507.gif (740.66 KB, 220x220, IMG_1901.gif)
>>81100>tfw you realize most of the newfag farmhands are from 2021-2022 obligatory dr doofenehmirts
No. 81124
>>81115I honestly want to know what some anons think is an acceptable female anime design.
But the more likely answer is that they're either anime haters and feel the need to infiltrate anime threads, or they're fujos who are incredibly insecure about seeing cute female characters ever, in any context.
Not a snipe at all fujos btw, I enjoy it sometimes. Just the ones who are blatantly anti-female.
Some anime is actually disgusting, like anything with clearly sexualized lolis, but trying to cancel the mundane stuff for what basically amounts to microaggressions is eh…
No. 81127
>>81126Ntayrt but for me, the issue is when images like
>>81067 begin creating hours of infighting and derailing. People who hate anime can use the anime critical thread. Fujos who are
triggered by the sight of women can use the various fujoshi threads.
There's criticizing stuff like lolis and harem anime, and then there's critiquing… I don't know, I guess shoulders? Sweater dresses?
I mean, scroll up, that image alone was alright generating infighting. It's just getting tiresome on threads that are supposed to be comfy.
No. 81129
File: 1721932571229.png (467.21 KB, 1440x1148, Screenshot_20240725_143451.png)
there's no reason for this to be redtexted it was posted in a previous thread when it happened.
No. 81130
>>81128>>>/m/399019 ended up having multiple days of infighting. First, about Sonico (pink haired girl in OP) and then about whether or not Spy x family and Yor are coomerish.
Tbf, that thread was basically set up for infighting from the beginning, and it wasn't meant to be an anime thread to begin with.
But I can confirm some anons will come into threads for specific media and say "I've never seen/played this but I hate the art so much" which is just a nuisance on comfy fandom threads.
At least the janitors have done a good job about banning those anons from my experience.
No. 81132
>>81131>personalityfaggingI don’t think it’s just one or two anons though?
Not an American Dad fan or stanfag or whatever but it honestly just seems like banter to me. I don’t think it’s gotten even close to that level
No. 81144
I actually appreciate the mods going straight to deleting when it's clear the attempt is to sabotage the thread/make it unusable/get it shut down.
>>81134I think this is pretty much proof that the "infighting" about TIFs/bisexuality is actually just angry moids and trolls who found a thread that had almost no trolling before recently and wanted to shit it up.
No. 81149
>>81147There's a space between 'hugbox' and basically twitter, anything that has a mildly attractive female character is cancel-able and the poster is a moid or pornsick sexually abused woman.
But yes, they will infiltrate anime threads and its annoying even if they're banned.
No. 81154
File: 1721969700285.png (1.58 MB, 1284x2203, CowBan .png)
That thread was made when the previous thread was at 1100 posts, is that not the post limit? Last I checked you were allowed to make new threads before 1200 posts but after 1100, can this at least be unlocked at 1200 and if it can’t be can it just be deleted since no one posted in it?
No. 81171
File: 1722015445327.jpg (456.17 KB, 1080x1663, Screenshot_2024-07-26-11-33-33…)
So finally I have definitive proof that mods are biased against white racism. Here, posted last night after some anon's shitposts I knew were gonna get red texted/deleted. This morning I wake up, shitposts deleted, racist post intact. Same post but with any other race would have gotten me banned. Just posting this here cuz I know some anons had been complaining about this and tried to bait the mods in a too obvious way so they also got banned for race-baiting but when you're subtle enough you can see the bias.
No. 81191
File: 1722069396441.png (249.37 KB, 747x888, 1000031149.png)
Not my post but this
>>>/w/332893 isn't nitpicking. Literally nothing is being "nitpicked" - it's a discussion. However all the tinfoil about Taylor sending her own kid's pictures to the Ritz Carlton so they could make a welcome card for her (and she could gush over it) is retarded tinfoil and should be redtexted.
>>>/w/332866>>>/w/332876>>>/w/332877>>>/w/332884>>>/w/332894It's clear all but one of these are by the same poster, why is this retarded tinfoiler allowed to shit all over the thread without a single ban to shut them up? There's nothing to suggest Taylor sent photos, they are low-res printouts from her IG. "Calm down." "Stop making it like that." "Shut up." "It's just influencer stuff." + posting wild tinfoil as if it's fact. At least put a temporary stop to it.
No. 81192
>>81191>>>/w/332884>may be they like taylor as a guestyeah, i'm sure they do kek. did no one report this as wking?
that aside. i'm surprised anons don't see anything wrong with hotel staff using a toddler's photos without his parent's consent. what's wrong with this place?!
No. 81194
File: 1722083356180.jpeg (137.91 KB, 750x1059, 1483DF2D-9D0D-4850-B020-1658FD…)
Tranny jannies are among us. Banned for stating the truth that the democrats prioritize trannies over women
No. 81196
File: 1722084713230.jpeg (56.5 KB, 537x399, IMG_1947.jpeg)
>>81171>biased towards white racism omfg it’s not that serious anon kek it’s not like you’re being called a nigger or a chink. i promise you you’ll live, the epitome of first world problems
No. 81206
>>81192>without parents consentThis tinfoil you guys have going on when its obvious pr since they were invited to the hotel, so means she sent them the photos most likely, is crazy. Taylor is a slow cow, but trying to come up with
problematic fake milk about her child from her posts is stupid af. Anons refused to be logical.
No. 81208
>>81207Lmao. This is how anons imagine the convo went.
"We're inviting you and your family to stay at our hotel. bla bla bla. In exchange for the promotion you'll get X and Y".
"OK. Here are the photos of my toddler. Use them in the handwritten greeting card".
No. 81210
>>81209>>81208It'd be actual milk if it was Taylor who sent her son's photos to strangers to be used as a part of a promotion.
It's also be double funny. Because then it's
her who sent a photo from an ad for a different hotel and lead Ritz to use it in their.
Anons think that arguing about who is tinfoiling and who's not is not ridiculous. Neither side can prove they are right. But for some reason only one side got banned.
I think the problem is not even who sent what. It's the fact that an underage child is being exploited by his parents and so many people find it OK.
No. 81212
>>81191Sent photos as in emailed them to the hotel/whoever deals with PR at the hotel so they can print them and make their little personalised card with the same generic message written by multiple staff members.
She obviously didn't mail them a physical photo. Idk why this thing in particular is getting anons in a tizzy, have you never seen a shitty handmade card before? They all look like this, as did most of my school projects as a kid kek. It took like 15 mins tops for staff to print, write the messages and go.
>>81210It was probably her agent and not even Taylor since I presume she has someone handling comms. She has an assistant filming, editing, a nanny, cleaner, it's likely her PR agent handles all the arrangements, and she just turns up and films content.
No. 81214
>>81212Samefag I'm gonna do an example email for the anons who are still confused
From: pr@ritzhotelHK.com
To: TaylorsPRAgent@PrServices.net
Dear Taylor's PR Agent
Thank you for agreeing to this sponsored trip for guests Taylor Richard and family (3 guests total) to stay in our ___ suite on dates _(date)__ to _(date)___.
Please ensure your client arrives before __(time)_ on the _(date)_ and give reference _(number)_ at the desk so the staff know they've arrived.
We will prepare a welcome pack for your client, if you could reply to this email and attach 3-5 images of your client, we can make our personalised greeting card and gifts.
Many thanks,
Ritz Hotel PR Lady
No. 81217
>>81214That's honestly how that works and anons arguing it isn't are retarded and clearly aren't influencers or have had companies reach out to them. Instead they'd rather tinfoil that some adult is going to use Levi's photos for bad reasons outside of a greeting card with
family photos included of Tom and Taylor. Wait until they hear about how pr handles celebrities having specifications for visits. All this information for how pr works is online. A simple Goigle search would've been smart for anons.
No. 81218
>>81217You can also figure out how it all works if you watch enough content creators for long enough, I used to follow the makeup conmmunity closely and they tended to make the pr process extremely transparent.
Taylor can obfuscate it a bit due to HK laws being less strict about sponsorships, but really you have to wonder what planet anons come from who are acting like this is all a mystery. Sponsorships and pr for influencers have been a thing for about a decade now. They always follow the same pattern, like you genuinely need to be a few sandwiches short of a picnic not to understand this in 2024 kek
No. 81230
File: 1722133641940.jpg (52.77 KB, 500x500, fc15f9e952846330b23b9c3be9c58b…)
>>>/g/419268please relax mod, it wasn't a brag, it was disagreeing with the accusation that everyone who thinks dasha is pretty must be ugly.
No. 81235
>>81234It's obvious now that it's the same anon defending herself with the same language and imaginary scenarios pushed as facts. She keeps putting words into people's mouth to prove her point and is very aggressive about it. If this isn't tinfoiling and infighting, I don't know what is.
And all of that for a retarded sellout influencer that doesn't even know anon exists and is fighting tooth and nail for her. Typical delulu wk.
Taylor thread moderation is a joke and it's a fact.
No. 81236
File: 1722166302567.jpg (115.46 KB, 700x467, 1481592656897.jpg)
I take responsibility for helping derail the Olympics thread and fully deserve a ban.
No. 81249
File: 1722194518060.jpg (16.44 KB, 505x404, 9e722738f7d5ee17d77c331c7e132c…)
Imo Rizz/Rizzed should be redtexted too.
No. 81250
File: 1722195837303.gif (271.94 KB, 498x498, pep.gif)
i just wanted to say i like the new image enlargement feature
No. 81266
>>81265what..
>you never used lc on a desktop before?ofc i did it just never showed up for me until recently. weird
No. 81277
File: 1722302118159.jpg (194.28 KB, 1080x552, Finally .jpg)
thank you based mods. This tinfoil about the staff being creepy is such a stretch and has been going on for 2 days and the only people thinking it's weird are these posters because they know nothing about how pr works lol they have got to be underage istg but they will turn around after saving all these photos of Levi and post them in the thread as if that's not the same but they hate when we call them creepy
No. 81287
File: 1722322133574.png (848.58 KB, 734x1017, 1000031287.png)
doubleposting just to ask for /ot/ mod to consider the context of posts. There is a lot of news discussion about two boxers who were rejected for medical reasons (testosterone and/or other issues not stated) from Olympic competition and some news sources question whether they are men. That's hardly troonfoiling, that's discussing a relevant issue; there was no fighting at all in the thread about it (some anons were on each side, even! and no one fought!). Maybe it got caught in the fight about the opening ceremony but please let us peacefully discuss actual news topics. It's not even based solely on appearances if they are have been banned for medical/hormonal reasons. An athlete who boxed against one of them previously stated she felt completely overpowered by her competitor and felt lucky she wasn't seriously injured. Beginning of discussion:
>>>/ot/2107824Picrel is one post that got a ban.
No. 81289
>>81286Ikr? At this point anything that mods disagree with is called "nitpicking". Mod is a retard. The boot licking chronic reporter is too.
This is the least nitpicky comment among posts about the pr manager.
No. 81320
File: 1722403811417.png (11.12 KB, 377x154, emergency.png)
>>81319I HOPE no woman says these words to me