[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/2X/ - (XX)

gender critical and female politics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password
(For post deletion)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog

Read the rules and usage info before posting.

The VPN ban is now in effect on /ot/, see this update post for more information

File: 1677467085800.jpg (28.42 KB, 336x500, 6703615-L.jpg)

No. 10868[Reply]

I think this is a good thread to discuss here. There's some times when I see women online who once considered themselves to be radfems to completely change their views and get into other ideologies at large. They become spinsters, blackpilled, right wing, libfems, etc. I've even seen women start identifying as nonbinary or transition after they no longer interact in radfem spaces. While some of them do a 180° turn, others just keep some of their radfem views while not interacting with other radfems anymore. I would like to discuss this phenomenon here, and in the case any of you have decided to stop being a radfem, you can also contribute to the thread and say why you quitted and how your views changed. Please no hate.
307 posts and 28 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 14514

>>14512
>I suppose many of these types of women do not actually believe in what content they put out or internalize it. once you truly understand what males are their attention on you is rather laughable.
This is exactly what's going on: she couldn't be bothered to apply the theory to reality and chose to entertain the flirting with an engaged man. Look at how there's no mention of his fiance either in these journal entries. It's all just me me me I love attention that I'm getting right now - yet in a matter of weeks she changed the narrative to claim she was "abused and charmed" and spends her nights crying on the bathroom floor. She also claims to be totally over the situation but can't stop making sly little videos and posts about it.
Tbh there is one good thing about this situation and it's that both KC and LM now have huge red flags over their heads. The former is an autistic unemployed unfaithful scrote and the latter is a spineless attention-seeking homewrecker who can't even muster up any sympathy to the women she hurts. Any person with standards and morals will hopefully steer clear of these idiots in the future. I hope KC's (now hopefully ex) fiance can move on and be happy.

No. 14517

Did anyone happen to see if anything else went down with LM yesterday? She’s deleted a lot of stuff now kek

No. 19726

File: 1694016374973.jpg (48.7 KB, 640x547, trgfs1vs92kb1.jpg)

I'm the person you banned months ago and while I still stand for what I said (criticism of any movement is healthy for the movement itself, or else it cannot be self aware. And more than ever there's more fucking right wingers in radfem spaces) I'm back to being a radfem terf manhater. Long story short I had a mental breakdown where I thought I was going to be exposed and everyone would hate me and I would lose my job because someone told me the lolcow staff had ties to the troon who attacked this site before and I believed it. And I thought I would be harassed and followed. I was in a panic and I'm not the sanest of people. Anyway that was the reason. I'm not anti radfem, pro tranny, or a male. That's all, Goodbye.

No. 22042

I hate coming across interesting threads only to find they've been inactive for months. Regardless, i wanted to share my thoughts on the ex Radfem matter.
There are times where i've distanced myself from GC/radfems over troon obsession but i always realize it is everywhere and it's a major anti-feminist force. But there are bizarre/repulsive things in the movement i simply can't accept. Like millenial radfems seething over younger women/girls in the movement, making degrading comments on their bodies (on radblr, for example) or being pretentious. I've come to realize it's their way of dealing with bitterness and assume a 'mother' role of sorts. Pseudo-familial hierarchies are incredibly suspicious. Separatists would be the worst offenders but i also see this in more normie radfem groups.
I think that the deeper problem resides in how we define 'politics'. Politics is acting on the real world, incl. your intimate life but especially on women around you, in the workplace, in your 'community' . It's great if feminism makes someone leave their mediocre nigel or shave less or whatever but it's not political, at least not to the degree of actively supporting other women. This confusion between personal choices and politics is so deep that even in this thread, we see anons who otherwise fully agree on cultish tendencies argue over husbands. Yes, marriage is servitude but a married woman who volunteers for women or fosters independence in her daughters/friends is an effective feminist. It's nowhere near what we could do, but still.
Imo it's also why the obsession with who we date, makeup and apparent femininity is so prevalent in radfems. It's easy to pat yourself on the back for not wearing makeup, chastise women who do, it's harder to challenge the mean girl mentality which is ironically extremely girly. Radfems' denial of their own, deeply entrenched femininity is super fascinating to me.
I'm just confused by the anons who hate even the idea of platforming our ideas to the wider public. I don't know how to break it but the average person is right-wing, even if they think of themselves as moderate. There's a nonna who kept mentioning people who'd be turned off by GC moms. But who, exactly? I know for a fact normies do not care for trans acceptance and don't care about accusations of 'tradthottery'. I also know that your average libfem has zero political sense beyond sharing nice posts online. Politics (again, action) isn't a game of finding peoPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

No. 39218

bump



File: 1672922932953.jpg (118.25 KB, 1280x720, coomer.jpg)

No. 7420[Reply]

A thread for discussing the cancer in society that is pornography.

>pornography is the orchestrated destruction of women’s bodies and souls; rape, battery, incest, and prostitution animate it; dehumanization and sadism characterize it; it is war on women, serial assaults on dignity, identity, and human worth; it is tyranny

-Andrea Dworkin
125 posts and 28 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39005

File: 1743865135253.jpg (52.65 KB, 630x167, 8.jpg)

Porn makes moids into pedos. It's so over for humanity.
>>>/ot/2475639

No. 39199

According to Linda Lovelace, her role in Deep Throat was forced on her by her abusive husband.

No. 39265

File: 1745543045215.jpeg (368.47 KB, 1170x1578, IMG_7637.jpeg)

so i’ve seen this faggot before as another one of those carbon copy anti censorship otaku whiners. whose BPD geared him to streamline infantile 2d porn and kpop girls to compensate his failing career and for attention seeking of course

anyways pic related consooooomoids desperately wish and think everyone around them is lying. they think everything that goes against their libertine excuses is a fetish. a sexual repression. you show them an honest portrayal of sexual brutality and they lose their shit and need to center it to their fictional and private worlds (a fetish, a kink) because they themselves cannot distinct. posters like these are more akin to sexual harassers shitting up everything

No. 39266

>>26580
So the point is to vaguely not look like the porn your father likes and change yourself because you are the fault of pedofiles and autopedofile womens participation in porn and porn culture. That's a highly specific victim blaming porny solution to a porny problem. Shouldn't the actual solution be report them to the police, mock the disgusting autopedofile women who act in porn and call child protective services.

>>39005
>>38758
KAM

No. 39267

>>39265
Making softcore rapeporn of women in fiction isn't stunning and brave like you think it is. All fictional depictions of women suffering are jerk off material to men.



File: 1642960622915.jpg (54.52 KB, 500x532, Tumblr_l_42527481055129.jpg)

No. 4098[Reply]

Gender critical and radical feminism define gender as sociological (feminine/masculine) and sex as biological (female/male). Woman is defined as an adult human female. Radical feminists seek to abolish gender as it is used by patriarchy to oppress women socially, reproductively, and financially. They strive to preserve women's spaces (such as restrooms, locker rooms, and health care providers) and areas of artistic and intellectual expression separate from men.

Trans ideology posits that one's gender is self-determined based on one's feelings and defines woman as the characteristics and behaviors traditionally ascribed to females by society. Increasingly, transactivists are conflating gender and sex and asserting that a person can self-identify both gender and sex.

Gender critical feminists strive to maintain the distinction between gender and sex. The conflation of gender and sex erases the biological reality of women, eliminates women-only spaces, and disestablishes women as a protected class. Existing laws and legislation currently being passed around the world allowing for self-identification on legal documents do not differentiate between gender and sex.

The acronym TERF (Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminism) is used primarily by transactivists and their allies to denigrate radical feminists and other women who express gender critical ideas. Transactivists portray TERFs as violent oppressors by virtue of their ideas alone.

Posts of related news and web articles are welcome. Posts of photos, videos, and blogs of transactivists for the purposes of discussion and critique are welcome. Please refrain from derailing, infighting, and ad hominem attacks. This thread is not intended for the general discussion of feminism, sexuality, misogyny, or misandry.

Previous threads
>>>/ot/221232 01
>>>/ot/231926 02
>>>/ot/248302 03
>>>/ot/267773 04
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
405 posts and 103 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 38845

File: 1742713664510.jpg (15.62 KB, 602x83, 77.jpg)


No. 38847


No. 38864


No. 38926

I do not feel bad for murdered troons who widowed their partners. They got exactly what's coming to them.

No. 39057

Kek just found out my personality zombie gendie coworker uses a binder. It's doing nothing for her, I almost feel bad for her.



File: 1743819820684.jpg (73.04 KB, 596x1024, GnepHIfa8AA.jpg)

No. 39009[Reply]

A thread for discussing issues related to IVF, gene editing, surrogacy and the concept of artificial wombs and how these can affect women individually and as a class
19 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39029

>>39026
Should've mentioned this in my post, but I was thinking of technology such as CRISPR, where they cut out the bad genes and replace them with good ones or just "sew" the rest of the genes together after removing the bad one. So the child wouldn't carry it anymore. I was under the impression they do this in the womb, do they only do it using IVF?

No. 39031

>>39019
It’s not possible for men to give birth to a child though, they aren’t biologically designed to do such. The only role a man can have in reproduction is providing sperm. But our role in creating a child is growing your fetus during the 9 months of pregnancy and then giving birth. These two things along with breastfeeding and the whole postpartum experience are your literal physical initiation into motherhood and caring for a child; and these celebrities and other ultra-rich are feeling like they’re above that just because they can afford to pay a woman to do it for them.

No. 39032

>>39028
>Everything about surrogacy lacks the fundamentals about childbirth: love
Nonsense. Many children got abused by their mothers even when it was them that shit them

No. 39034

>>39021
I'm sure he has a hidden loli porn collection.

No. 39360

>>39021
I'm conflicted. I mean we have a chance to eliminate certain diseases forever and actually improve the gene pool. But only women should access. Men can rot with their AI waifus



File: 1715347680217.png (1.14 MB, 827x1267, DW2M5q7.png)

No. 24356[Reply]

A thread for documenting and discussing the issues of the surrogacy Industry and the harms it causes to women and children.
32 posts and 16 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 38409

Why do we have two threads for this? https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/22845.html

No. 38440

>>38409
there was an anti-surrogacy thread on /2x/ and an anti-surrogacy on /ot/, the latter was also moved on /2x/ for some reason

No. 38536

File: 1741244223822.jpg (83.21 KB, 657x415, fdsg.jpg)


No. 38759

File: 1742288104164.jpg (45.62 KB, 621x193, k.jpg)

Excellent.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/17/surrogate-parents-too-afraid-to-return-to-italy-after-procreative-tourism-law
>The gay couple could be among the first Italians to be prosecuted under the law, enacted in early December, which extended an outright ban on domestic surrogacy by making it a universal crime that transcends borders, putting them on a par with terrorists, paedophiles and war criminals.
>The measure can lead to prison terms of up to two years and fines of between €600,000 and €1m (£500,000 and £840,000).

No. 38977

File: 1743621996292.png (292.12 KB, 605x741, MQiRFCp.png)




File: 1723574421710.jpeg (856.4 KB, 2896x2896, wnH6Ki1.jpeg)

No. 31633[Reply]

A thread for blackpill feminism. Discuss heterosexual dynamics, female psychology, and the flaws of the feminist movement here.

If you disagree with the entire premise of the thread, you have no reason to enter it. Remember that entertaining disingenuous liberal feminist debate is running around in circles.

Previous thread >>30265
1111 posts and 84 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 38804

>>38798
What the fuck is that? Come on oldfag let’s get you to bed you’re senile.

No. 38805

File: 1742455599883.jpeg (302.04 KB, 1170x684, IMG_1360.jpeg)

>>38801
Jesus does she ever fucking shut up?

No. 38829

>>38805
She's based, I'm happy she's from boland

No. 38833

>>38829
>I'm happy she's from boland
What do you mean?

No. 38872

>>32047
imo high IQ people will always crop up in the gene pool and you don't need to select for it. It's a waste for >1% of intellect to have kids, the brain isn't set up for it.



File: 1673183694740.jpeg (9.13 KB, 275x183, images (2).jpeg)

No. 7569[Reply]

A place to share moments in films, TV shows, clips from magazines, comics, interviews etc. that highlight radfem talking points or the insanity of trans ideology. Including points made accidentally.
154 posts and 37 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 36749

Any radfem podcasts?

No. 36755

>>36749
redfem?

No. 36866

>>34876
I remember the one Simpsons episode where one of the twins was gonna marry a troon, but yelled back at him saying she only liked girls. American tv used to be so based

No. 37575

>>22245
I'm inclined to agree with you nona.
This show is probably one of my favorite cartoons and while I don't think Mike Judge fully intended for it to be read in a more feminist way, the show definitely does a good job at depicting how young men can be (unintentionally) misogynistic (along with other issues) when not given any proper guidance. They're basically the antithesis of everything that could possibly go wrong in a moid's upbringing, going wrong.

No. 38750

Just finished watching the latest White Lotus episode and there is the most perfect AGP monologue from a sex-addicted white middle aged man feeling like he is an asian girl on the inside



File: 1709148046988.jpeg (617.65 KB, 1282x2358, 2ncuxofm0j5c1.jpeg)

No. 22845[Reply]

A thread for documenting and discussing the issues of the surrogacy Industry and the harms it causes to women and children.
18 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 37566

File: 1734925350101.mp4 (10.41 MB, 720x1280, Oli London - LGBTQI+ Influence…)


No. 37694

>>23734 This photo actually makes me so sick and angry. Soo fucking creepy.

No. 38165

File: 1738844969617.jpg (66.8 KB, 648x301, aa.jpg)


No. 38166

>>38165
This is the Gammy case, the worst thing is that the dad was a nonce

No. 38167

>>38166
>the dad was a nonce
Like a clockwork.



File: 1710597615193.jpg (18.91 KB, 260x280, feminism-abstract-concept-vect…)

No. 23143[Reply]

I believe we seriously need to uplift female creators who spread anti-manosphere messages in order to counter the online wave of misogyny

Here are some examples I thought of :

> BurbNBougie (Youtube link : https://www.youtube.com/@BurbNBougie)

> Princella Clark (Youtube Link : https://www.youtube.com/@TheQueenMaker)
> Tree of Logic (Youtube Link : https://www.youtube.com/@justtree411)
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 23484

There's a whole thread like this on /m/ why not add it there??

No. 38136

>>23150
trolley sure doesnt like white women, implies feminism isnt for white women in addition to all other races of women, on her tradwives vid. This is very divisive and unhelpful. Yet men support each other in their crimes against any race of women. Shes doing the same thing misogynist men do, just add the word "white" in front of it.

This is coming from someone who doesnt even count as white, as Im half Southern European (apparently that makes me not white acc to wasp women). But trolley would probably call me white to hate on me, either way, its still a misogynistic mentality.

Childfrees content is just rereading reddit stories. While I like the antibreeder angle, a lot of it looks like it criticizes mainly women.

The others dont really appeal to me either.

We need better man hating youtubers that will improve womens lives, ie how to navigate moid psychology and thwart their attempts at abuse and control on a personal and societal level.

No. 38137

>>38136
White women shouldve think that when they chose red cock over other womens liberation

No. 38151


No. 38156

sarah klait on tiktok makes fun of boymoms, but not a fan of her mocking young girls for looking old. Other than that, her videos are very therapeutic and funny. We need more anti boymom content in the world.



File: 1730597299287.png (311.35 KB, 640x340, markramseyer.png)

No. 36122[Reply]

Yo. I was reading about comfort women and was amazed to find that, in 2021, a Harvard professor (picrel) wrote a paper claiming that the Japanese Military never forced any women into sex slavery in WW2. He also claimed that a 10-year old girl from Borneo willingly agreed to become a sex slave for the Japanese. He has also, to date, never apologized about this, and believes that North Korea is to blame for everyone calling him a fucking idiot.

In honor of this, I wanted to make a thread about this kind of blatant misogyny under the guise of higher academia. ITT we name and shame any and all "academics" who are guilty of this. Bonus points if you post screencaps of any academic papers they've written.
9 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 36730

>>36143
>world's leading transgender health authority has been collaborating with an academic who had fantasies of castrating and sexually enslaving little boys

> Thomas W. Johnson, a professor emeritus at California State University-Chico who has lectured extensively on gender dysphoria and “expanding the transgender umbrella.” Johnson utilized the moniker “Jesus” on the Eunuch Archive and registered with the forum in 2001.

>One notable example is a story titled “Larry,” which is prefaced as being an “original nightmare by Jesus.” The story is written in an imaginary future where the law allows any adult to “sell himself or herself, or any parent to sell a child over the age of 10.”
>Not even halfway into the story, the 10-year-old child is put in chains and iron restraints before being castrated without anesthetic.
>During a physical examination conducted by the narrator, the child is described as “even more beautiful without his clothes.” The narrator is later described as sharing a bed with the boy and “massaging his little genitals.”
>Under his moniker, Johnson also encouraged site members to submit fantasies of castrating children in a dystopian setting wherein eugenics had become enforced by the government. The framework for the fictional world was drafted by a site member who called himself Erik, in a story titled “The Making of the Modern World.”

No. 37003

i feel like most “queer theorists” fall into the category of “academia misogynists” but idk if it stems from a hatred of women or just a general retardation and lack of comprehension of reality

No. 37004

>>37003
It's complicated that, cause prominent second wave feminist's(like monique wittig)
It's a little more complicated, because prominent second wave feminists (such as monique wittig) technically also participated in the foundation of queer studies, spearheaded by focault, it was based on rejecting essentially all forms of established methods of analysis and even research, believing that those had been created by those in power to maintain power and any revolutionary movement would end up re-creating those systems(this was their explanation for the soviet union and why communist revolutions turn into dictatorships) so in a feminist example, radical feminists are not marxists but radical feminism uses marxist methods to address the condition of patriarchy(that men are the oppressor class and women are the oppressed class) a queer theorist would argue that radical feminism is doomed from the start because it is a 'cis- hetero-male' method of analysis that was intended only for hetero-male european workers and not for the globally oppressed classes

No. 37971

File: 1737644246764.jpg (121.36 KB, 818x575, us.jpg)

>Yale course asks if black and white women can be friends
https://www.thecollegefix.com/yale-course-asks-if-black-and-white-women-can-be-friends/

No. 37975

>>37971
I remember there was a twitter thread about something similar where people discussed how most academics in the social sciences are complete losers who can't comprehend normal human interactions



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Search
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]