File: 1673105496718.jpeg (333.52 KB, 625x415, the-utter-helplessness-of-look…)
No. 1469519
File: 1673450214406.gif (1.89 MB, 500x278, originals-3.gif)
I hate how no one seems to be bothered by AI art and how it will affect women. Strangers can take a picture of you on the street without you ever knowing and then use AI to enhance the picture and then they can make all the deepfakes they desire out of it. It will be a while before we get any laws that protect us against this, they are still trying to figure how to deal with revenge porn so deepfakes will have to wait. But I bet when lawmakers finally find a way to deal with this, a gazillion men and nlogs are gonna come out of the woodwork and say "uhm actually deepfake porn is healthy because it allows men to explore their sexuality without hurting women" and then its gonna trigger a whole philosophical debate that is "what is consent? Are we truely our own picture?" and then anti copyright groups will come out and say "you can't copyright you're own face. Feminist groups are trying to make the human body into a product by slandering deepfakes".
This will force lawmakers into putting these laws and protection measures on hold until we have solved these debates. By the time lawmakers tries to pick up these laws again deepfake porn has become so normalised that women have just learned to live with and have forgotten there was a time where this wasn't an issue.
They are probably gonna make a law that says it's illegal to make deepfakes out of women with onlyfans or who has starred in porn on the grounds of "if a woman's income comes from porn then deepfakes of her is stealing", but that's the only law of protection we get. So in a few years a woman's choice is just to accepted that people are gonna make porn out of her without her consent or she gives in and starts making "consual" porn movies. When all of this happens men will finally admit that they view women as sex objects they can use and not as humans but at this point all this has become so normalised and women have become so powerless that they can't fight back. All because of muh healthy coping mechanism.
I don't even wanna think how deepfake porn is gonna affect children but no doubt pedophiles will take advantage of it and everyone is gonna turn a blind eye to it because "at least they are not fucking real children"
No. 1470073
I think "man"kind has always been this terrible, but now we have lenses to see it or stumble across it like we do now. Like the shield from harm was always an illusion. You can't protect children from stumbling across the most deviant shit online. Despite the fact you should monitor your children when they're using the internet, the great majority of parents do not. One of the most disturbing moments in my life was on Omegle when the person i got connected to was a boy no older than 10. He was telling me to get naked while watching hard-core porn on his phone and he showed me because i asked wtf that sound in his background was. I reported it, but i highly doubt anything was done about it. The fact a child already got fucked up like this makes me fear for the future. I honestly think parents deserve prison time for letting their children unattended online because 9/10 they're up to no good. Like think about all the times you were unsupervised online and you never told you parents the horrors you saw, the men who preyed on you, the propaganda you read/watched, the freak hugboxes you joined, the links you clicked that you regretted, and so on. It WILL get worse unless parents actually watched their kids. The grown generations are not longer able to be helped for the most part, prevention is the only way at this point. Porn sickness is a STD these days, every man and too many women have caught it and there is unfortunately no definite cure from corruption. The lack of willpower people have today means their addictions and deviancy will not come to an end on their own. Somebody has to play parent and restrict these things from them because they simply cannot stop from over indulging in things they shouldn't. Basically the future is scary because men exist and men's brains are inherently weak to literally ANYTHING and they cannot stop themselves from sharing their fap material and shitty opinions with everybody. Technology is not innately bad, it only does what a person wants. Anyways every chan board is proof men should not be allowed online ever. Their true thoughts come out and it's always sum godamn diarrhea worm infested thought they should have kept to themselves.
No. 1470159
File: 1673484300389.jpg (68.94 KB, 720x783, 360f5195c67d6ad91b0e6a789b8075…)
hell world
No. 1470166
File: 1673484758207.png (359.44 KB, 506x2920, 1647667479900.png)
>>1469519Reminds me of picrel and how something like this will most likely come true.
Bleak.
No. 1470193
File: 1673486916248.gif (2.91 MB, 275x275, 1670620471036.gif)
>>1470179>this is the type of sperg that i will have to deal with in the futureJust kill me already god, or at least send me back 20 years so i dont have to be peers with these retards
No. 1470320
File: 1673497382315.jpg (16.8 KB, 328x340, 3120bd313f2b6a9dd0f857cff50da7…)
>>1470179Sometimes I think about having an AI companion when I'm depressed. I never attempt it because A. I'm too retarded to figure out how to work it, and B. I'm very aware that it would completely fuck up my life. I already don't feel close to most people irl as said like
>>1470216 but an AI boyfriend would definitely keep me a virgin forever.
It's tempting because the AI would be a perfect reflection of you and everything you need/like/want in a partner, never ask anything of you, never force you to compromise, never have weird or irritating habits, etc. but that's just not what a real relationship is. I'd imagine having an AI bf would be like getting mirrored/lovebombed by a narc 24/7, except it never ends so you can never potentially realize you want to leave. Scary.
No. 1470452
>>1470179t. Autist comsoomer
This shit kind of basically shines a light on rat people like you that just want to consoom and talk at people instead of actually wanting to form legitimate connections. You’re so empty and devoid of a personality that you need something to be there to mirror your thoughts and beliefs in order to feel comfortable. You might as well talk to a mirror and not have to wait for AI.
What’s the point of your life if you just want to consoom and hear yourself talk? You probably have nothing interesting say seeing as you’re too afraid socialize with other people who don’t just reiterate what you say and fawn over you like you’re a genius.
No. 1470470
>>1469519I'm so happy that there's other anons expressing worry about this as well. There's already been cases where moids have made deepfake porn from their classmates and have shared it in forums that discuss making deepfake porn, so it's not only for the male's consumption, he's going to share it and it's going to be accessible for everyone.
Only thing we can do right now is to start obscuring our social media posts, don't ever post your full face in a one picture. Just limit everything that can be used in training the AI. Putting your hand on top of your face is an artsy way to go with it, if you don't want to put ugly stickers on top of your face.
No. 1470472
File: 1673527162802.jpg (257.3 KB, 900x675, 1673258741107.jpg)
>>1470452Really fucking sad there is people out there that ignores that AI steals from real humans(without their consent) to learn, just because it gives them 5 seconds of dopamine. It's only a matter of time until these AIs go pay mode only and this retard, attached to an unexistent thing, ends up paying to talk to her ''husbando''.
No. 1470532
>>1469519I'm sorry that this is somewhat off-topic, but your perspective-considering thinking skills are amazing nonna. And you're completely right, though I want to think that the pushback, especially from mothers, will be much larger.
>>1469542>>1470312You know they're just going to make them subscription-based..
No. 1470538
File: 1673534425620.jpeg (338.76 KB, 1240x1920, 67D07DA3-8C61-4339-9620-32FE25…)
>>1470072Skin? Face? Hair? No thanks.
No. 1470635
>>1470538Your other opinions are retarded, but this one is unfathomably based
>>1470597I came across a website yesterday that made me question if it was written by an AI or not. It's depressing as fuck to me that the Internet is slowly being saturated with this dogshit unengaging content in the name of SEO.
No. 1471458
>>1470652I think a lot of homework is bullshit, but learning how to write well is such an important skill imo. If kids use AI to write their essays they're really missing out. Even if you don't plan to be a writer, the ability to organize and express your thoughts can help you in plenty of careers. Plus it helps strengthen critical thought and the ability to substantiate those thoughts. I think it's a huge L.
I think AI is going to make us dumber. I mean look where we are, already having endless conveniences and entertainment feeds. Now we have this stupid fucking program to think for us, imagine for us, create art for us. Species suicide
No. 1471488
>>1469519None of the AI art generators allow porn or nudity and the moids at reddit are so pressed about that. So upset in fact, that some coomers are trying to make a version of Stable Diffusion, Unstable Diffusion, that will do that. Kickstarter banned their project and reddit coomers were so pissed.
>>1470652Some guy at princeton wrote a program to detect stuff written by chatgpt3. It doesn't have a 100% success rate but all is not lost.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/katienotopoulos/ai-writing-detection-tool-homework-students No. 1472223
>>1470835This is so fucking true (in my experience as a zoomer). Ofc some classes would be fine but some would have that
one kid (usually a moid) who was obnoxious as fuck and always interrupting class and getting into arguments with the teacher. I can see the positives of abolishing homework but in reality it might not be too good due to circumstances in the classroom like this.
No. 1472641
File: 1673672554785.jpg (144.2 KB, 768x983, h4rq6wj8on901.jpg)
I'm not gonna lie, I think the possibility of andrioids are absolutely rad. Imagine the possibities, being able to have an actual conversation about the newsworthy events, possible tutor for your kids, help with chores, etc. I'd think it'd be important though not to treat it like a maid, since it will be sentient and we don't want terminator shit happening kek.
But realisitically with all the new technological advances recently, I have noticed just how lazy I've gotten in learning how to use it. I wonder if we are going to end up like our parents and call our kids to come turn on the tv or how to change a setting on our phones.
No. 1472915
>>1472223The example given could be due to the current school curriculum not being stimulating enough for the annoying student or the fact the parents were neglectful in the early years. One unruly student shouldn't have the power to prove things can't be accomplished in the classroom.
>>1471458There's no stopping essay writing while in the classroom, I remember having to write an essay for one of the standardized tests and we were given about 50 minutes to write 2 pages. It's totally possible.
No. 1491600
>>1470179I'm defending this anon. I'm tired of other women being too scared of AI, as if hesitating and opting out of using it will do a thing to slow down clown world. We might as well use it for our own fantasies. Who cares if
>>1470179 doesn't want human friends? I could even argue that it's much safer for a woman to go and get off with an AI husbando or generate text than have to deal with men she doesn't want to for the chance of good companionship. Imagine if you were back in the early 90s and knew how the internet would change the world, would you write it off or would you remember that it has also been a space for majority-female communities, hobby or otherwise? Unfortunately in my time wading through AI guides, all of it involves NSFW guides for men to make porn of virtual women, but that's the point: this is our chance to use the AI for our own purposes, take it in our direction for whatever we want, until (tinfoil) glowies and corpos lobotomize and cap the technology in the fucking knee to make it shill more useless, invasive products that women don't need.
I'm pissed that when I look up anything about KoboldAI, it's already a sausage fest where I know it's a bleak landscape of Discord moids asking discreetly how to fuck a text waifu. But who cares, moids are doing what they've done throughout human existence (violently defecating and jizzing everywhere, ruining everything like retards). AI isn't human and we can have it for ourselves if we get in there early enough and take control. I just wish I was enough of a savant autist to make a real change but I'm just a regular autist hoping to reach through at least one person here who gets what I'm trying to say.
No. 1491609
>>1470072Samefagging for a sec but actually right now, for the attractive cost of free, I can train several things to make the art, voice, and text description of a hot robot boyfriend, all offline on my own computer. Granted, I'd need a very expensive computer and lots of spare time, and I'd be piggybacking off the creation of horny programmer moids, but it is possible. How many of you know this and how many of you simply stay away because you're afraid of it?
>But you updated your sex bot already right, only poor idiots have the old model. People in less wealthy countries already settle for products several price tiers below the best of the best an iPhone toting American teenager can get and it serves them perfectly fine. We're not at that dystopian point yet where you either have the futuristic sexbot or not, right now there's tons of people (well, mostly moids) cooking up free alternatives to the AI tools out there today that some of us can run at home. It's not Skynet or nothing for now.
No. 1491986
>>1491668And what’s wrong with being optimistic? I’m not even being so, I’m just tired of being a doomer and tired of seeing people pass this up. The AI puts out what people put in, if nobody makes datasets with whatever women want then of course it won’t happen, and it definitely won’t happen if every woman who might be interested or is capable of being involved stays away out of fear. I feel the same about every female artist who would ignore StableDiffusion as a tool not only out of ‘art theft’ but for because it gets used for porn. Just use a model that doesn’t use stolen/explicit material or train it locally purely on your own art,
it can be ethical. This isn’t a lost cause, at least not for personal use.
And AI is at that point where I don’t see coom where I don’t want it in my text adventures actually, there are multiple models provided that are only trained on SFW stories. It takes some time and work but that’s just like any other hobby.
The genie isn’t going back in the bottle so we might as well make something of it and at least educate ourselves to know how it works and where things are advancing to. Again, people can use it ethically. I’m by no means deluded into thinking people can build a utopia out of AI but having being passive towards every new advancement for being a future porn generating misogyny tool is just ignorant. I’m not all pro AI either, there’s a couple of women in /ot/ talking about making cover letters in ChatGPT by telling the thing details about their careers or pouring their hearts out to character.ai and I wonder if it’s ever crossed their minds not to tell the fucking cloud-based service with muddied privacy policies about their real life. I wonder if it’s is a problem with them not knowing or not caring these things enough and that’s why I feel the need to say what I’m saying here.
If nobody else wants to take the time and effort looking into it, then I can’t change your minds and I doubted I would to begin with. I only regret not finding another autist of a woman who is into it. Can’t wait until two decades into the future where activists try to push “AI for women” too late and it fails because it’s become a boys only violence and coom tool that girls don’t get because girls aren’t into computers /s
>>1491688That wasn’t really my point but if you wanted to do just that then why aren’t you or other anons doing the same with AI that’s coming out right now, like poisoning their data or finding and fucking up some of the developers?
No. 1492044
File: 1675655538441.jpg (33.14 KB, 502x366, d4f4fb66d0bc43ca6a8a1a538c8183…)
I am so scared of this deepfake stuff. I have a daughter and it feels so hopeless sometimes. I just want her to be safe and happy and not have to worry about disgusting coomers. Women need to create heavily vetted anti-technocoomer communities. I was reading comments on youtube about the recent deep fake scandals and the venom and perversion that exudes from countless men (most of them even having the audacity to comment vile shit on their government name profiles) is so frightening. I feel like this will just force so many women to hide. Full on burqas and masks so we won't be targeted and harassed.
No. 1492589
>>1465903>are we doomedno. not yet.
>what are your futuristic predictions?i honestly don't know. can't think of anything right now.
>what worries you the most about how technologies are usedi am mainly concerned with how ai tech and deepfaking may be used politically/socially to sway people and manipulate public opinion. i think we are really going to have a hard time telling what's real and fake in terms of information and that's what scary to me because it was bad before, but just imagine how much worse it can be. because eventually it will be easy to plaster someone's face onto a screen and say they said something, and now you have visual "proof" of it and can emulate people's voices…so you would need to be specially trained to either spot the differences or have the technology to be able to tell that what you are seeing is a deepfake. and most people are not aware of these things and probably wouldn't believe they're real until they actually happen. i do think on some level this is happening, but it isn't so widespread that we run into it everyday.
No. 1506233
File: 1677059275664.jpg (72.81 KB, 1080x1350, 1666488062365080.jpg)
>>1469519This is a main reason I don't like to share my photos on social media and have no instagram, but you are right, with the way AI tech is developing soon coomers will be able to make deepfakes with a single pic they took of you.
I also worry about work prospects, how writing and art, damn even coding was considered as irreplaceable professions in for a while, but we already see tech working in the direction of replacing all of it. I hate how people actively engage with this tech out of curiosity and just make it smarter and smarter.
We are really doomed, we don't even need machines going against us and raging a war, people will willingly enter a virtual simulation to become batteries for robots.
No. 1535849
File: 1680102369291.png (19.01 KB, 477x499, openletter.png)
So an open letter has been signed by Elon and others to pause giant AI experiments for 6 months, claiming it's for the good of humanity. but this is clearly just so they have the chance to catch up with the technology and take control over it, right?
https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ No. 1592680
File: 1685494062386.gif (2.55 MB, 498x366, vddrm.gif)
gonna sage because if I bump the thread all the interlopers will come and shit up the thread to hell
a few days ago I was thinking how all the 80's cyberphobia media couldn't get close to the effects of technology on the human brain and psyche. Is almost comical what they were afraid of, loosing our physical form seemed to be the biggest treat at the time. Some did tackle the degeneracy that could happen in response to technomania but the current absolute destruction of social skills, emotional development and coping mechanisms is nightmarish to an almost sublime degree. Gretchen Bender was the only one who did accurately interpret the stimuli overload that we casually deal with today, I kind of love being alive to witness these cursory extirpations of the necessary human experience for development and maturation. All Extol Our Keeper.
No. 1661687
File: 1691814737741.jpeg (309.71 KB, 1284x1590, googlescholar.jpeg)
Read the bold part in each result. This is sad to witness. Most of these are in scam "journals" where you can pay to publish anything. Academic librarians in universities could filter all these out of their database, but the public won't have access and will be stuck with google scholar.
No. 1836454
a start to a new year has got me wondering whats going to come next. what are your predictions nonnies?
my only positive prediction is that people will get bored with social media, which is already happening. however, something worse may pop up in its place. video seems to be replacing text on all fronts so perhaps the tiktok model will keep going strong, but less of the twitter model.
we'll see lots more AI growth and possibly 2024 will be the year that virtual reality/metaverse shite finally gets pushed out more into our every day lives instead of just being all talk and hype.
>>1620171replying 6 months too late but i can't help but think about this a lot too. i don't know the answer, everything is so uncertain and bleak. i'm gonna try and focus on what makes me feel grounded more this year (ie, less time on the internet).
No. 1837058
>>1837009You know what, I agree with you. A few years ago it was really hard to find like-minded women who openly talked about the drawbacks of motherhood, societal standards for men vs women, and emotional labor in relationships. I basically wasn't allowed to talk about it in person because my friends would get scared and start defending moids because not all men! Stop being so negative! It was only radfems on Tumblr and Reddit, and they were largely considered crazy old manhating hags.
Now this kind of discussion is common on tiktok, especially post-Barbie. Sheraseven and Thewizardliz videos have been viral for a while, normie women are calling out and dragging shitty moids, lots of women are leaving shitty relationships and prioritizing female friendships. Love to see it, honestly. The same women I know who stuck their head in the sand a few years ago are now vocal about the double standards for mothers and fathers after becoming moms themselves.
No. 1837093
>>1836975>usually the whole game isn't on the disk anymore and you have to download more shit anywaysi've been becoming more of a data hoarder for this reason (storing online videos, games, movies etc. on a physical hd) because I don't trust that the services I usually view or play those things on won't suddenly cut me off or charge me more, or simple cease to exist.
>I think we're going to get to a point where storage space will be highly covetedi dunno i think they'll probably find a way to keep making it more efficient but until they do, there is gonna be a lot of purging
>>1837009>our good times have just begunthis is what really gets me. we've had such a small, small window. in the grand scheme of things, it's been a blink of an eye since women had rights and some bodily autonomy, let alone a voice in the intellectual sphere or participation in previously male-dominated areas. which is why it's especially troubling that the concept of what we are is already returning to become whatever a man decides we are. it's been barely 5 seconds and already we're regressing back.
what luck that women's liberation era seems to have overlapped with this period of acceleration and we're racing through what should be the "good times" for women into a transhumanist future that doesn't sound too great for women.
No. 1837286
>>1837192>>1837198>>1837205Things like this are why I'm glad I was always terminally online enough to know when to check reliable sources when I see news online instead of jumping to conclusions. But that's not something that's taught anymore these days. We went from schools teaching their primary school students until high school how to be internet savvy and how to not be tricked by propaganda or rumors online when the internet became mainstream to toddlers using their parents' ipads to check weird fetish videos on youtube and normies being easily tricked into believing anything they see on tiktok and fb. My mother often shows me shitty tiktok videos with captions full of typos, AI voices narrating some sensationalist story with an ott dramatic background music and every single time it's bullshit or a baseless rumor that's being investigated or greatly exaggerated. Every single time. Now I image people just like her believe anything but not having anyone around to tell them to not believe that crap.
Unrelated but that's why I try to prioritize physical copies for video games, books, etc. Once you have a physical copy it's yours, it can't be changed without your knowledge unless you let your consoles automatically download patches for your video games. News articles online are sometimes put under a paywall and most articles have clickbait headlines. I remember a French article about how difficult it is for young North African-French women born and raised in France because there's a cultural gap between them and most French people, but also between them and their families. But it was under a paywall and a shit ton of people back the were outraged that the newspaper allowed such far right extremism to be posted online, it's racist and islmaophobic and dangerous, etc. Turns out that it was a normal text written by, you guessed it, two young NA-French women talking about their own personal experiences and using many reliable testimonies from other women like them. But of course nobody read the article and jumped to conclusions instead of just letting it go or paying for the article. It's too easy to manipulate normie internet users' emotions. Even when a fact or some news are accurately reported it quickly becomes a game of telephone (or memes if you want, it applies here) so companies, governments and news sources often don't even have to do any work to spread misinformation, it's happening by itself quite often.
Kojima was right. No. 1853535
>>1469519Honestly, this doesn't scare me at all, it's not my body or my actions. It's an amalgam of random porn actresses with my face pasted on. It doesn't affect me, or say anything about me.
The only negative consequence this could have, is if people irl believe the video is real. But by the time generating something like this is possible, pretty much everyone will know the video is most likely to be AI.
No. 1861498
File: 1705705194248.webm (2.72 MB, 768x432, 1705704941570025.webm)
i have nothing against ai but i seethe that men are driving the tech so it's all for the benefit of men. where are all the degen women ensuring i can have my ai husbando and do something like picrel, i want to escape the other sex too
No. 1885803
File: 1707744311588.png (2.6 MB, 1922x1518, waymo.png)
>A Waymo car went up in flames in San Francisco's Chinatown after a crowd surrounded it, scrawled graffiti, smashed windows and then threw a firework inside the driverless vehicle in the middle of a crowded street Saturday night.
>Tensions over driverless cars have risen since a driverless Cruise car, owned by General Motors, hit a woman in downtown San Francisco and pinned her underneath last fall, sending her to the hospital with serious injuries.
>The incident eventually forced Cruise to suspend operations, while its competitor Google-owned Waymo has marched their expansion forward, recently arriving in Los Angeles to wary officials and worried taxi and truck drivers. A limited number of Waymo driverless cars are on Los Angeles streets, as the company offers test rides by invitation.
No. 1888161
File: 1707932723461.jpeg (953.31 KB, 2480x3508, marrying holograms.jpeg)
a woman is set to marry her hologram boyfriend.
https://thegaze.media/news/spanish-artist-to-become-the-worlds-first-woman-to-marry-an-ai-generated-hologramfirst in picrel is her dream boyfriend, who is "helping" her cook and do the dishes as they chat about their day. the second pic is a man who married a 16 year old girl hologram who calls him master. ultimately AI boyfriends will be emotional support robots and AI girlfriends will be sex slave robots.
>>1861498hope you can create your dream AI hologram husbando nona
>>1885803based. glad to see it.
No. 1888180
>>1861498I know i'm late but since i've seen this i end up thinking about how women with realistic 3D husbandos are lucky (idk, COD, Resident Evil, Yakuza, etc.).
Imagine just dropping his model and you can have the same thing you've loved right in front of you…
This comes from a nona with a bishie 2D husbando, i might just sculpt him into existence but it will never be the same.
No. 1888191
File: 1707934137236.jpeg (175.87 KB, 614x610, 7691976D-05D8-4EFD-AF5A-8BC1FC…)
The older I get the more skeptical I become with practice and philosophy
of transhumanism, but there’s a part of me that still wants extreme body modification. I still want possible cybernetic enhancements and genetic alterations and the ability to live a long healthy life. Most because I’ve always felt unsatisfied with my own physical body and I want the opportunity to do what I want in my lifetime, and I feel like I can’t do that without enough money and I feel like I was born in the wrong place to be able to do stuff I want to do in my life. I still have a weird optimism for the future but I don’t think I’ll live to see the good stuff. I strongly believe the 21st-century will be a rough transitional period but beyond that it will get better. Most because of automation and better artificial intelligence.
No. 1888430
>>1888255and right now it's a clunky and expensive headset that few can afford or be bothered to use all the time, but soon it will be sleek, affordable and - at some point - implantable. I can, unfortunately, imagine a world where basic services and necessities will be limited to artificial reality and the real world will become more hostile to those who choose to live in it through their own eyes, instead of the augmented version.
vision pro and metaverse shit is gonna be pushed so much this year, but I really hope there is some pushback to how it's used going forward.
No. 1889762
File: 1708038048707.mp4 (1.2 MB, 854x480, m2-res_480p.mp4)
>OpenAI’s latest model takes text prompts and turns them into ‘complex scenes with multiple characters, specific types of motion,’ and more
other than the spoon witchcraft and general creepiness of her facial expression, this example is pretty impressive. it's only gonna get more impressive soon and our ability to know what videos are real will be greatly diminished.
No. 1889824
>>1889775only just noticed the carved wooden bottle in the background and the balancing rolling pin kek.
i also love the pile of eggs on the shelf.
No. 1890252
File: 1708076149100.jpeg (638.47 KB, 2400x1600, 01_NICOBO_2021.jpeg)
I want to have a cute pet like companion robot with ai psychology chat training so we can become friends and I will never be alone again. Like nicobo but not a toy, could be like my dream of having a real life pokemon
No. 1890253
>>1861498there are some of us that do insanely cringy stuff for our husbandos
nonnie. i used to make virtamate models so i could see my husbando in vr. now i'm using the AI tools to create more content for myself like stable diffusion loras, chatbots, or audio models. i use RVC to clone my husbandos voice and feed it NSFW roleplays for him to voice over kek
No. 1890306
>>1890253>virtamate modelsgod I wish, but I don't think I'll ever be good enough to edit models, let alone make something from scratch.
Also, don't actually have a VR headset…
I need to figure out how to actually use this voice model I found to make things too.
No. 1890814
File: 1708115191348.jpg (58.04 KB, 312x239, 7K9SE0LTOGBNE7T0ACMDESIJG-12.j…)
>>1889762Someone list me 3
positive uses for this technology. I'll wait.
No. 1890818
>>18908141. hospitals could use it to showcase certain procedures without actually having to cut open a body/pay someone to open up blender or whatever
2. instantaneous recreations of things that have happened in the past
3. general funny memes and such
No. 1890857
>>1890818>hospitals could use it to showcase certain proceduresthis one is an interesting answer and a good example of how it could be used for educational purposes. but it feels like it will be a limited window between the AI training humans, before it's AI training AI. and that transition scares me.
>instantaneous recreations of things that have happened in the past I don't see how this could be a positive. Instead of dramatised recreations (which can be used to emotionally manipulate but are still clear that they're just interpretations) there will now be doctored "footage" re-writing historical events. Similarly, actual real footage of events could be written off as fake.
>general funny memes and suchhave AI image generators led to funny memes? not really, it was fun for about 5 seconds and that was only when the technology was
bad. people got bored when it became more sophisticated. because they enjoy the novelty and will always crave the creative process, even if it's tempting to cut corners.
>>1890814even if someone can think of a positive, all the negatives far outweigh it.
No. 1891120
>>1888161Lonely women: creates ai that is her age, loves her and is her equal
Lonely men: misogynistic retards that create underaged ai girlfriend bangmaid that treats their 5ft greasy ass like god.
No. 1891547
File: 1708184683714.gif (1.96 MB, 265x200, 1587693820124.gif)
I don't agree with shit like KOSA but I feel like it's only a matter of time before legislation catches up and entraps the internet. I'm not exactly smart, but I don't disagree that the internet should be regulated in some way. Specifically I think corporations should have their necks stepped on. In my opinion also we wouldn't be in half this mess if even a marginal percent of parents did their fucking jobs instead of handing their kids off to be parented and raised by strangers on the internet, niche websites, unknown chatrooms and money hungry corporations, but here we are. But asking a parent to take accountability for parenting mistakes is like arguing with a retarded concrete wall.
Anyway I don't know the solution to this problem in general since even the parent thing also partially involves socioeconomic problems I'm not privy to, so let's just say I'm in for the wild ride