[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/2X/ - (XX)

gender critical and female politics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog

Read the rules and usage info before posting.

The VPN ban is now in effect on /ot/, see this update post for more information

File: 1710597615193.jpg (18.91 KB, 260x280, feminism-abstract-concept-vect…)

No. 23143[Reply]

I believe we seriously need to uplift female creators who spread anti-manosphere messages in order to counter the online wave of misogyny

Here are some examples I thought of :

> BurbNBougie (Youtube link : https://www.youtube.com/@BurbNBougie)

> Princella Clark (Youtube Link : https://www.youtube.com/@TheQueenMaker)
> Tree of Logic (Youtube Link : https://www.youtube.com/@justtree411)
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 23484

There's a whole thread like this on /m/ why not add it there??

No. 38136

>>23150
trolley sure doesnt like white women, implies feminism isnt for white women in addition to all other races of women, on her tradwives vid. This is very divisive and unhelpful. Yet men support each other in their crimes against any race of women. Shes doing the same thing misogynist men do, just add the word "white" in front of it.

This is coming from someone who doesnt even count as white, as Im half Southern European (apparently that makes me not white acc to wasp women). But trolley would probably call me white to hate on me, either way, its still a misogynistic mentality.

Childfrees content is just rereading reddit stories. While I like the antibreeder angle, a lot of it looks like it criticizes mainly women.

The others dont really appeal to me either.

We need better man hating youtubers that will improve womens lives, ie how to navigate moid psychology and thwart their attempts at abuse and control on a personal and societal level.

No. 38137

>>38136
White women shouldve think that when they chose red cock over other womens liberation

No. 38151


No. 38156

sarah klait on tiktok makes fun of boymoms, but not a fan of her mocking young girls for looking old. Other than that, her videos are very therapeutic and funny. We need more anti boymom content in the world.



File: 1730597299287.png (311.35 KB, 640x340, markramseyer.png)

No. 36122[Reply]

Yo. I was reading about comfort women and was amazed to find that, in 2021, a Harvard professor (picrel) wrote a paper claiming that the Japanese Military never forced any women into sex slavery in WW2. He also claimed that a 10-year old girl from Borneo willingly agreed to become a sex slave for the Japanese. He has also, to date, never apologized about this, and believes that North Korea is to blame for everyone calling him a fucking idiot.

In honor of this, I wanted to make a thread about this kind of blatant misogyny under the guise of higher academia. ITT we name and shame any and all "academics" who are guilty of this. Bonus points if you post screencaps of any academic papers they've written.
9 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 36730

>>36143
>world's leading transgender health authority has been collaborating with an academic who had fantasies of castrating and sexually enslaving little boys

> Thomas W. Johnson, a professor emeritus at California State University-Chico who has lectured extensively on gender dysphoria and “expanding the transgender umbrella.” Johnson utilized the moniker “Jesus” on the Eunuch Archive and registered with the forum in 2001.

>One notable example is a story titled “Larry,” which is prefaced as being an “original nightmare by Jesus.” The story is written in an imaginary future where the law allows any adult to “sell himself or herself, or any parent to sell a child over the age of 10.”
>Not even halfway into the story, the 10-year-old child is put in chains and iron restraints before being castrated without anesthetic.
>During a physical examination conducted by the narrator, the child is described as “even more beautiful without his clothes.” The narrator is later described as sharing a bed with the boy and “massaging his little genitals.”
>Under his moniker, Johnson also encouraged site members to submit fantasies of castrating children in a dystopian setting wherein eugenics had become enforced by the government. The framework for the fictional world was drafted by a site member who called himself Erik, in a story titled “The Making of the Modern World.”

No. 37003

i feel like most “queer theorists” fall into the category of “academia misogynists” but idk if it stems from a hatred of women or just a general retardation and lack of comprehension of reality

No. 37004

>>37003
It's complicated that, cause prominent second wave feminist's(like monique wittig)
It's a little more complicated, because prominent second wave feminists (such as monique wittig) technically also participated in the foundation of queer studies, spearheaded by focault, it was based on rejecting essentially all forms of established methods of analysis and even research, believing that those had been created by those in power to maintain power and any revolutionary movement would end up re-creating those systems(this was their explanation for the soviet union and why communist revolutions turn into dictatorships) so in a feminist example, radical feminists are not marxists but radical feminism uses marxist methods to address the condition of patriarchy(that men are the oppressor class and women are the oppressed class) a queer theorist would argue that radical feminism is doomed from the start because it is a 'cis- hetero-male' method of analysis that was intended only for hetero-male european workers and not for the globally oppressed classes

No. 37971

File: 1737644246764.jpg (121.36 KB, 818x575, us.jpg)

>Yale course asks if black and white women can be friends
https://www.thecollegefix.com/yale-course-asks-if-black-and-white-women-can-be-friends/

No. 37975

>>37971
I remember there was a twitter thread about something similar where people discussed how most academics in the social sciences are complete losers who can't comprehend normal human interactions



File: 1648025523613.jpg (88.53 KB, 976x549, p06b69vl.jpg)

No. 4405[Reply]

ITT: female figures that you looked up to or were inspired by, but turned out they were either pick-me's or betrayed their ideals for one reason or another
155 posts and 24 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 25823

>>24600
Who is she? I don't recognise her.

No. 26594

>>25823
PJ Harvey

No. 31497

>>24600
Latereply but me too, also the clips of her being offended by being associated with the feminist movement make her seem like a huge pick me. I still love her first two albums but it put a sour taste in my mouth.

No. 37868

File: 1736977942676.jpg (577.51 KB, 1741x1741, _methode_times_prod_web_bin_0a…)

i used to love her music but can't support her anymore after reading about how she supplied her husband with young women to rape in front of her son. absolutely vile

No. 37897

>>4406
I never respected her. I called her a tranny in 9th grade and my art teacher got mad at me.
I am proud of 9th grade me.
Artemisia Gentileschi was always superior



File: 1648973794950.png (166.66 KB, 540x332, maleapprovalpoints.png)

No. 4526[Reply]

A place to discuss and vent about pickme or fake self-serving feminist behaviour you have witnessed or experienced, online or IRL, to post cringe screenshots or memes, theories and tinfoils etc.

This is separate from the tradthot general as it’s not just for discussing particular women with particular belief systems, as there are many kinds of pickme out there. However, trad-thottery can still be discussed as it is classified as pickme behaviour.

Pick Me General #1 >>>/2X/627
Handmaiden Thread >>>/ot/398608
697 posts and 143 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 37179

>>24467
Child abuse has many flavours. Both the mums and their boyfriends of the week should lose custody and spend some time in jail.

No. 37331

>>35622
I know girls like this. Sucks shit. A lot of them are close. Like they are generally peaked, but because they can't handle a bit of anonymous imageboard infighting (which isn't nearly as bad as the schizo shit on 4 chan) they go back to the site where they were groomed at in middle school.
It really fucks with my head that like when I was 11-13 I was on neopets but when a lot of zoomer girls were 12 they were on fucking 4 chan.
I found 4 chan when I was a young adult and I was kind of overwhelmed by it.
Rest assured, a peaked pickme was 100% groomed by incels (who she still wont fuck because she's peaked enough to know moids are rapists).

No. 37332

>>24350
Oh I mean I feel for her and shit. But at the same time Laura Southern is right back in that alt right grift. Idk if its because she's trapped because she needs that redneck money even if it comes at the cost of her influencing young girls to idealize tardwife trap.
She's a bit less overtly anti feminist now though. I'll hand her that, but she's still retarded.

No. 37335

>>20858
I'm trying to see some 4D chess where she gets a fat inheritance when he dies in 30 years but it's fucked. She's using his 50 year old dusty gametes that baby is gonna be 200 percent autistic as fuck, time consuming, stressful and her geriatric husband will think child care isn't part of the deal. I know she wants to be some modern tardwife nlog or whatever but she needs to understand the 50s turned into second wave feminism for a reason.

No. 38241

>>20858
She's really pretty too. It's a shame she hates herself so much to the point of marrying this hideous old man and having his autistic offspring. All this for 100 a week. Her life looks pretty miserable tbh



File: 1648663380053.jpeg (411.01 KB, 1206x1761, 242F09AE-982D-407E-81BA-14EDA8…)

No. 4446[Reply]

Post your memes here, or request for others to make a meme for you.
1199 posts and 843 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 36944

File: 1731553213816.jpeg (47.02 KB, 593x421, download (10).jpeg)


No. 37054

File: 1732010777504.png (355.91 KB, 1024x984, sPA52tK.png)


No. 37055

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 37084

File: 1732120585625.jpg (27.07 KB, 275x275, 1731484646044.jpg)

kekkkk

No. 37087




File: 1679692480923.jpg (182.82 KB, 1136x852, 640c286cd81e7e0018be1751.jpg)

No. 12213[Reply]

I thought about making a thread just for this topic because I see it being discussed sitewide and it would be more interesting to see it all condensed over here, so it does not get drowned between other unrelated post. Feel free to give out your opinion here.
95 posts and 36 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 23057

>>22970
I really do wonder if these types can be convinced to stockpile medication and then mass OD when their bullshit lands the annoying orange back in the Oval Office.

No. 23061

>>22970
if troons want to die, let them. Only sad they can't take more males with them.

No. 23915

>>23057
we can only hope

No. 36667

File: 1730998630607.png (85.19 KB, 751x434, lol.png)

Another trans genocide in the making, hooray!

No. 36697

>>36667
literal only good thing about this election is the troon melties.



File: 1726295862394.jpg (24.3 KB, 450x360, 360_F_43378187_2UghtI4Fj2mec0R…)

No. 33686[Reply]

Report rulebreaking posts in this thread and do not respond. This thread will be permanently locked if the state of posting does not improve.

A thread for blackpill feminism. Discuss heterosexual dynamics, female psychology, and the flaws of the feminist movement here.

If you disagree with the entire premise of the thread, you have no reason to enter it. Remember that entertaining disingenuous liberal feminist debate is running around in circles.

Previous thread >>31633
1174 posts and 81 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 35683

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 35684

>>35677
God I love clitoral orgasms(do not encourage personalityfags)

No. 35687

>>35663
>I can’t relate to the ramblings in this thread
Then why are you here? God sake

No. 35689

>>35685
Yes, the anatomy is feminine and women love it. Women do not envy men and never will. Is that what you wanted to hear?

No. 35712

>>35639
Wtf is this



File: 1659079085038.jpg (246.67 KB, 800x800, Tumblr_l_502072421667743.jpg)

No. 6232[Reply]

All day every day in radfem, gc, terf, feminist, pinkpill what-have-you spaces you can find the phrase "no hope for women". I've typed it myself. And sometimes it feels good to acknowledge that despair, almost comforting, but in reality it just paralyzes us. Let's talk about what gives us hope instead.

>What gives you hope for women?

>Are there any women who inspire you? Not just feminists or in a feminist way, but admirable women in general
>What do you think should be the next step for the feminist movement?
>Can you think of an action anons could take today to advance the liberation of women, however small?
90 posts and 19 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 14541

>>7039
>also the sad reality is that without actual military support this uprising will fail
That's the unspoken part of this mythology and the most blackpilling point for me, that all of this is actually wanted (where it exists), allowed by the moids.

To clarify, there are two very distinct topics being discussed here.

The first is separatism >>14537
. It is achievable and already exists without the moids in power having directly created it. They tacitly allow it, probably don't care, and I can't see these groups disappearing anytime soon unless they were to be presented as "deviant sects". For me, this is the healthiest, most accessible and achievable way and the one that allows a total separation, even if it could be subject to troonish infiltration attempts.

The second is the gain of influence in the moid society >>6681 , the access to positions of responsibility, the taking of power in the current system. It seems illusory to me. Generally, for a fundamental social change to occur, there has to be an insurrection, or even a revolution. There have been militant women, even feminist fighters, but nothing analogous. All that was allowed and phagocytized by the moids, at least some moids, the wealthy and powerful ones, obviously. However, the internet has really allowed for the emergence of real mass alternative currents created organically, and this is a note of hope. Too bad it can't exist in a country like Iran that has tight control over its intranet.


But until women have the physical, or at least material (guns), capacity to lead an insurgency, this is all mostly wishful thinking. Even if it seems to be materializing in reality, all this is actually very precarious. To take an extreme case, see Afghanistan. I know it's not quite comparable because religion is much more important there, including for women, but the way everything turned around in just a few days blew my mind. Nothing is ever immutable and the greatest empires have collapsed, but our foundations depend entirely on their goodwill, or rather their interests.

No. 18603

Seeing how many women can now stand on their own feet and leave their abusive parents, partners, etc. compared to 20 years or so ago gives me hope. Men are losing their minds over the divorce statistics because they're mad we can finally leave them when we're in unhappy marriages.

No. 18639

The fact that even young girls on TikTok are waking up to the bullshit and rejecting the tranny narrative.

No. 18651

>>18639
Post caps of it! I wanna see but I ain't going on that cursed data stealing app kek

No. 35128

File: 1728323286177.jpg (72.36 KB, 837x179, huh.jpg)

>>10795
This is very enlightening. No wonder the most patriarchal societies run on scam, like India.



File: 1653559502915.jpeg (64.59 KB, 615x410, word-image-115.jpeg)

No. 5459[Reply]

I have been getting more and more frustrated recently with the "radical feminism" some people in radfem communities practise. It's especially apparent here in lc, since we have anonymity - though I have ran across it in radblr etc too. Women saying INCREDIBLY misogynistic shit (cockbreath, dick worshipper, e-semen brain pick me….) to other women they deem unpure, "gender traitors/sleeping with the enemy".

I truly admire women practising separatism or 4W and the like. It is not for me personally (not yet at least), but I respect their choice and dedication. However, I cannot see how the borderline psychotic hatred some women have for like 90% of all other women is feminism. Hating men and male violence is more than justified - but some "radfems" seem to put way too much of their anger into women who choose to interact with men in any way. There are women who deserve criticism for doing vile shit for male attention, but having some lame ass boyfriend and posting on lolcow is not one of them in my opinion.

I'm just so incredibly tired of running from male misogyny to female-exclusive spaces, only to find out the same shit with a pink bow on top.
481 posts and 44 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 33955

I notice another thing with these groups is that they don't deem abuse by women as actual abuse. They'll often invalidate female survivors of female abusers, e.g. moms or ex girlfriends.

No. 33956

>>33917
I don't understand how this is misogynistic in any capacity. If he won't marry to establish a family then why breed with him? Nothing disgusts me more than seeing women with kids, and she's unmarried, but her children have a different last name. If he won't marry you they should have your last name at the very least, you fucking grew them in your womb and have primary custody but he gets the glory of passing on his legacy with 0 commitment.

No. 33972

>>5459
It makes sense because the amount of times you see women dedicating everything to shitty men for years and getting NOTHING in return is insane. We should pretend its all fine and not tell you how stupid you look, why? After all that you still ask for respect? You have to fucking earn it. Marrying some rich douche and throwing your identity down the tubes for points doesn't get any respect from me its just sad. Look if you're stupid as shit enough to stay with the dumbass in your life.. and then proceed to complain about men in general, im going to let you know. You're not above getting an earful about your stupidity just because you're a woman. A lot of women are simply out of touch with how insane they look. I've given up on trying to understand what goes through their little moid-obsessed pig brains. I'm not sure what you want from me? Sympathy? Commeraderie? Over what exactly? You sell your soul and your life to stay with a shit moid and pump out his shit crotchlings and proceed to abandon every shred of joy, creativity, individuality for what? What do you want from me? I don't owe you sympathy if this is how you choose to unravel your life.

No. 33993

>>33972
Based and individualistic. But there's a reason why fuck all people would know of Grace Hopper but everyone knows of some broodmare sex tape nude leaked pop artist. You can only blame men for so long, if you don't recognize women are part of the problem things will never change.

>What do you want from me?

To join the moid worship death cult and/or to assure them they're not in the wrong.

No. 34882

>>33972
>implying someone, let alone a woman, talks to your neet ass irl.
But seriously, you are not doing anything favourable for woman with that miserable, devoid of empathy, moid-like attitude. Idk if you are an under 20 years old, or a very sheltered individual but if you pay attention to these woman, you hear them, you make them feel safe by not judging them, you could actually help a woman who is in a shitty relation to step out.
Even you could help a DA victim, you never know what kind of hell these woman are enduring.
And you could teach them about feminism too. You should get down from your high horse and do fieldwork, because shitposting in a mongolian weaving forum is doing nothing for women.



File: 1726108518689.png (524.71 KB, 720x707, fem.png)

No. 33444[Reply]

A thread for all your questions about feminism. It doesn't matter if you're a newbie or simply unsure about something, please feel free to ask anything pertaining to feminism over here. Opinions may vary, please don't infight. There's no such thing as a stupid question.

No. 33445

I've been watching a reality show as of lately, and in that show there's a girl that, because she was very vocal about some other contestant being a misogynist pig (he is) she became a "feminist icon" of some sort in my third world country for a week and a half (the guy had to abandon the show because of how much he verbally aggravated others, including the girl). But actually looking at her actions, besides of what she did to the stupid misogynistic guy, she also acts very aggressive and mean with her fellow female contestants, wants male validation, and there's rumours she might have hit her mother before the reality started. People on social media really tried their best to make her into a local feminist resistance icon but I don't think she is one. She calls other women bitches and always tried to get on with a guy that doesn't even like her the entire season and got jealous of her own friends for being friends with the guy. She even tried to use feminism against another woman just because that woman held hands with the guy ("how dare you touch him against his consent" etc, she thought the woman touched him in his privates but she only held hands). My question is, what are you supposed to do in these cases? Am I supposed to celebrate this? Am I being a bad person for pointing out the way she's absolutely not a feminist to my own understanding?

No. 33567

File: 1726221169298.png (239.18 KB, 2732x2048, img_0027.png)

Can any kind nonna give their thoughts on this article?
>The Mother of All Same-Sex Parenting Studies
>Since 1957 the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics has annually interviewed between 35,000 and 40,000 households, collecting data on 75,000 to 100,000 individuals comprising a nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States. The present study examines combined 1997-2013 NHIS data, consisting of information on 1,598,006 persons, including 207,007 sample children. This sample included 2,751 same sex couples—2,304 cohabiting and 447 spousal—consisting of 1,387 male couples and 1,384 female couples; 582 couples—406 female and 176 male—had children under age 18 in the home. A more extensive battery of health questions, including the measures of emotional health used in this study, was completed for 512 children sampled, one per family, from the same-sex parenting families.
>Dr. Sullins, who analyzed the NHIS data, concludes:
>The higher risk of emotional problems for children in same-sex parent families has little or nothing to do with the quality of parenting, care, or other relational characteristics of those families.
>If the greatest benefits for child well-being are conferred only on the biological offspring of both parents;
>•and since same-sex relationships cannot, at least at present, conceive a child that is the biological offspring of both partners, in the way that every child conceived by opposite-sex partners is such;
>• then same-sex partners, no matter how loving and committed, can never replicate the level of benefit for child well-being that is possible for opposite-sex partners.

>This defect, moreover, is an essential and permanent feature of same-sex relationships; it is part of their definition, an irreducible difference that cannot be amended or abrogated by improving the circumstances, stability, legal status or social acceptance of same-sex couples.


>The primary benefit of marriage for children may not be that it tends to present them with improved parents (more stable, financially affluent, etc., although it does do this)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

No. 33672

>>33567
Haven’t read it but Googled “mother of all same sex parenting studies” and found this.
https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

> We identified 79 scholarly studies that met our criteria for adding to knowledge about the well-being of children with gay or lesbian parents. Of those studies, 75 concluded that children of gay or lesbian parents fare no worse than other children. While many of the sample sizes were small, and some studies lacked a control group, researchers regard such studies as providing the best available knowledge about child adjustment, and do not view large, representative samples as essential. We identified four studies concluding that children of gay or lesbian parents face added disadvantages. Since all four took their samples from children who endured family break-ups, a cohort known to face added risks, these studies have been criticized by many scholars as unreliable assessments of the well-being of LGB-headed households.


This is an interesting note: some studies include parents who come out as gay, divorce, and remarry as examples of gay parents, when this is obviously an unusual and highly stressful situation. I don’t know if the study you mentioned accounts for this. Try to look up meta-analyses of same sex parenting outcomes that examine multiple studies, those tend to be more useful than a single study as they reveal statistical trends. This blog post explains the use of them: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/12/beware-the-man-of-one-study/

There’s not a lot of interest in pickiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Search
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]