/2X/ - (XX)

This is a new one.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14055809/father-guilty-manslaughter-baby-son.html

>>36706
The title reads like the onion. Clown world.

i'm in the UK, it makes me so sad seeing little girls in hijabs. i swear originally hijabs were distinctly for grown women only? these kids are indoctrinated into literally the most degenerate religion. it should be illegal. i’m being so for real i am sick of muslim bullshit in the UK. why do normal people have to be “”tolerant”” of this bullshit when they are so intolerant of us??? creating sub communities where they only speak in foreign languages and “police themselves” and commit incest…. how does this shit fly in the UK? just because politicians don’t want to be called “racist”.

>>36789
This is child abuse (dressing an elementary-school girl in clothes covering the whole body when it's hot outside, for example), but nobody dares to point it out.

>just because politicians don’t want to be called “racist”
Blame the UK law. No party wants to lose votes or be cancelled by the electorate. The majority of UK Muslims come from Commonwealth countries (Pakistan, Bangladesh, India), and so have special voting rights:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_citizen
https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/running-electoral-registration-england/eligibility-register-vote/what-are-nationality-requirements-register-vote/can-a-commonwealth-citizen-register-vote
Yes, a person who freshly arrived from Pakistan has the same voting rights as a UK citizen. It's by design.

I hate how first world pickmes brag about how being able to wear the hijab is a privilege and an expression of self modesty or whatever. Yeah, it's a privilege for you because you live in a country where you have the freedom to do so or not. Meanwhile little girls are stoned to death and acid attacked for showing a strand of hair in your mother lands.

>>26517
just watched this nona. the part where the male kills the mother goddess and then puts on her skin is really eerie

>>35618
omg thanks for posting the webcam for this >>24057
cartoons used to be so based

Any radfem podcasts?

>>36749
redfem?

>>34876
I remember the one Simpsons episode where one of the twins was gonna marry a troon, but yelled back at him saying she only liked girls. American tv used to be so based

>>22970
I really do wonder if these types can be convinced to stockpile medication and then mass OD when their bullshit lands the annoying orange back in the Oval Office.

>>22970
if troons want to die, let them. Only sad they can't take more males with them.

>>23057
we can only hope

Another trans genocide in the making, hooray!

>>36667
literal only good thing about this election is the troon melties.

>>35060
Then I guess the only correct way to behave on the internet would be to pretend to be a moid again, just like in the old times? If one wishes to avoid creeps and misogynists, I mean.

>>35974
I mean… 100 years ago, and before that, women had to pose as men if they wanted to become doctors, soldiers, pirates, and published authors. Unfortunately it's a sad fact of life that women often have to pretend to be men if we want to be taken seriously and avoid the threat of male sexual violence. Of course, the solution isn't to conclude that you are internally a man, or that women are the lesser species, it's to conclude that men are hopelessly evil and depraved and that's just part of human nature.

Don't know if this is the right thread but whatever. I think the only way to make more TiFs peak is to spread gender critical shit on tiktok. So many girls on there are so close to getting out of it but they don't wanna be twansphobic!! So they're stuck in their comfort zone. Can speak from experience, it took me months to drop the nonbinary identity label (even while reposting Radfems on twitter). Ramble off

>>30602
I wanna share my story too,
>Be me
>Awkward tall horse and wolf girl, unironic furfag and weeb, very autistic
>Hangs out with boys growing up, picks up their mannerisms
>Always bullied and excluded by other girls for reasons above
>Boys hate me because i'm not attractive or feminine enough
>Life is a nightmare where i feel like i dont belong anywhere
>Joins tumblr in teen years
>Ohno.jpg
>Only people who hang out with me are gendies online (aka weird girls who felt forced to poon out), some of which are really old and normalize trooning out and mutilation to me
>"I act like a guy, i dont belong alongside normal women, the only people who accept me are tifs, theres no reason why i shouldnt transition"
>Classic he/she/they genderfluid identity crisis
>Super cringy anime boy inspired haircut, hiding tits with baggy clothes
>I'm a big transmedicalist and edgy so the troons who i am friends with end up leaving me for being too bigoted
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>35000
>they/them pronouns in bio but masculine pfp
The first thing that would clock you as female ngl

>>35677
God I love clitoral orgasms(do not encourage personalityfags)

>>35663
>I can’t relate to the ramblings in this thread
Then why are you here? God sake

>>35685
Yes, the anatomy is feminine and women love it. Women do not envy men and never will. Is that what you wanted to hear?

>>35639
Wtf is this

>>7039
>also the sad reality is that without actual military support this uprising will fail
That's the unspoken part of this mythology and the most blackpilling point for me, that all of this is actually wanted (where it exists), allowed by the moids.

To clarify, there are two very distinct topics being discussed here.

The first is separatism >>14537
. It is achievable and already exists without the moids in power having directly created it. They tacitly allow it, probably don't care, and I can't see these groups disappearing anytime soon unless they were to be presented as "deviant sects". For me, this is the healthiest, most accessible and achievable way and the one that allows a total separation, even if it could be subject to troonish infiltration attempts.

The second is the gain of influence in the moid society >>6681 , the access to positions of responsibility, the taking of power in the current system. It seems illusory to me. Generally, for a fundamental social change to occur, there has to be an insurrection, or even a revolution. There have been militant women, even feminist fighters, but nothing analogous. All that was allowed and phagocytized by the moids, at least some moids, the wealthy and powerful ones, obviously. However, the internet has really allowed for the emergence of real mass alternative currents created organically, and this is a note of hope. Too bad it can't exist in a country like Iran that has tight control over its intranet.


But until women have the physical, or at least material (guns), capacity to lead an insurgency, this is all mostly wishful thinking. Even if it seems to be materializing in reality, all this is actually very precarious. To take an extreme case, see Afghanistan. I know it's not quite comparable because religion is much more important there, including for women, but the way everything turned around in just a few days blew my mind. Nothing is ever immutable and the greatest empires have collapsed, but our foundations depend entirely on their goodwill, or rather their interests.

Seeing how many women can now stand on their own feet and leave their abusive parents, partners, etc. compared to 20 years or so ago gives me hope. Men are losing their minds over the divorce statistics because they're mad we can finally leave them when we're in unhappy marriages.

The fact that even young girls on TikTok are waking up to the bullshit and rejecting the tranny narrative.

>>18639
Post caps of it! I wanna see but I ain't going on that cursed data stealing app kek

>>10795
This is very enlightening. No wonder the most patriarchal societies run on scam, like India.

I notice another thing with these groups is that they don't deem abuse by women as actual abuse. They'll often invalidate female survivors of female abusers, e.g. moms or ex girlfriends.

>>33917
I don't understand how this is misogynistic in any capacity. If he won't marry to establish a family then why breed with him? Nothing disgusts me more than seeing women with kids, and she's unmarried, but her children have a different last name. If he won't marry you they should have your last name at the very least, you fucking grew them in your womb and have primary custody but he gets the glory of passing on his legacy with 0 commitment.

>>5459
It makes sense because the amount of times you see women dedicating everything to shitty men for years and getting NOTHING in return is insane. We should pretend its all fine and not tell you how stupid you look, why? After all that you still ask for respect? You have to fucking earn it. Marrying some rich douche and throwing your identity down the tubes for points doesn't get any respect from me its just sad. Look if you're stupid as shit enough to stay with the dumbass in your life.. and then proceed to complain about men in general, im going to let you know. You're not above getting an earful about your stupidity just because you're a woman. A lot of women are simply out of touch with how insane they look. I've given up on trying to understand what goes through their little moid-obsessed pig brains. I'm not sure what you want from me? Sympathy? Commeraderie? Over what exactly? You sell your soul and your life to stay with a shit moid and pump out his shit crotchlings and proceed to abandon every shred of joy, creativity, individuality for what? What do you want from me? I don't owe you sympathy if this is how you choose to unravel your life.

>>33972
Based and individualistic. But there's a reason why fuck all people would know of Grace Hopper but everyone knows of some broodmare sex tape nude leaked pop artist. You can only blame men for so long, if you don't recognize women are part of the problem things will never change.

>What do you want from me?
To join the moid worship death cult and/or to assure them they're not in the wrong.

>>33972
>implying someone, let alone a woman, talks to your neet ass irl.
But seriously, you are not doing anything favourable for woman with that miserable, devoid of empathy, moid-like attitude. Idk if you are an under 20 years old, or a very sheltered individual but if you pay attention to these woman, you hear them, you make them feel safe by not judging them, you could actually help a woman who is in a shitty relation to step out.
Even you could help a DA victim, you never know what kind of hell these woman are enduring.
And you could teach them about feminism too. You should get down from your high horse and do fieldwork, because shitposting in a mongolian weaving forum is doing nothing for women.

>>33678
The only thing i can think of is me shitting on women who call themselves lesbians then suck dick, then saying you can't trust even "lesbians" to not be cocksuckers, I'm a sensitive person with anxiety due to fear of harsh situations in human life and normies scares me, normie behaviors scare me, and I have a phobia of sex as well due to obvious reasons
Other reason I can think of is the anger, and last reason is me complaining on my twitter circle about you drooling over a 12yo Natalie Portman
, but I didn't even talk about this topic in probably a year, I talked about it cause I talked about all women in general being annoying
None of your words have any meaning if all you do is lie, and yes you did harras me and engage in that

>>33682
Do you have a memory loss?

>>33642
>Is it a result of the twitter likes going private
No it's just a result of Elon taking over Twitter and allowing this type of stuff to be shared. On Twitter you can see straight up softcore cp, zoophile porn, /Pol/ tard memes and gore with over 1k-90k likes

>>33642
>still using twitter
thats your first mistake. only the most depraved of moids use social media.

I've been watching a reality show as of lately, and in that show there's a girl that, because she was very vocal about some other contestant being a misogynist pig (he is) she became a "feminist icon" of some sort in my third world country for a week and a half (the guy had to abandon the show because of how much he verbally aggravated others, including the girl). But actually looking at her actions, besides of what she did to the stupid misogynistic guy, she also acts very aggressive and mean with her fellow female contestants, wants male validation, and there's rumours she might have hit her mother before the reality started. People on social media really tried their best to make her into a local feminist resistance icon but I don't think she is one. She calls other women bitches and always tried to get on with a guy that doesn't even like her the entire season and got jealous of her own friends for being friends with the guy. She even tried to use feminism against another woman just because that woman held hands with the guy ("how dare you touch him against his consent" etc, she thought the woman touched him in his privates but she only held hands). My question is, what are you supposed to do in these cases? Am I supposed to celebrate this? Am I being a bad person for pointing out the way she's absolutely not a feminist to my own understanding?

Can any kind nonna give their thoughts on this article?
>The Mother of All Same-Sex Parenting Studies
>Since 1957 the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics has annually interviewed between 35,000 and 40,000 households, collecting data on 75,000 to 100,000 individuals comprising a nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States. The present study examines combined 1997-2013 NHIS data, consisting of information on 1,598,006 persons, including 207,007 sample children. This sample included 2,751 same sex couples—2,304 cohabiting and 447 spousal—consisting of 1,387 male couples and 1,384 female couples; 582 couples—406 female and 176 male—had children under age 18 in the home. A more extensive battery of health questions, including the measures of emotional health used in this study, was completed for 512 children sampled, one per family, from the same-sex parenting families.
>Dr. Sullins, who analyzed the NHIS data, concludes:
>The higher risk of emotional problems for children in same-sex parent families has little or nothing to do with the quality of parenting, care, or other relational characteristics of those families.
>If the greatest benefits for child well-being are conferred only on the biological offspring of both parents;
>•and since same-sex relationships cannot, at least at present, conceive a child that is the biological offspring of both partners, in the way that every child conceived by opposite-sex partners is such;
>• then same-sex partners, no matter how loving and committed, can never replicate the level of benefit for child well-being that is possible for opposite-sex partners.

>This defect, moreover, is an essential and permanent feature of same-sex relationships; it is part of their definition, an irreducible difference that cannot be amended or abrogated by improving the circumstances, stability, legal status or social acceptance of same-sex couples.

>The primary benefit of marriage for children may not be that it tends to present them with improved parents (more stable, financially affluent, etc., although it does do this)Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>33567
Haven’t read it but Googled “mother of all same sex parenting studies” and found this.
https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

> We identified 79 scholarly studies that met our criteria for adding to knowledge about the well-being of children with gay or lesbian parents. Of those studies, 75 concluded that children of gay or lesbian parents fare no worse than other children. While many of the sample sizes were small, and some studies lacked a control group, researchers regard such studies as providing the best available knowledge about child adjustment, and do not view large, representative samples as essential. We identified four studies concluding that children of gay or lesbian parents face added disadvantages. Since all four took their samples from children who endured family break-ups, a cohort known to face added risks, these studies have been criticized by many scholars as unreliable assessments of the well-being of LGB-headed households.

This is an interesting note: some studies include parents who come out as gay, divorce, and remarry as examples of gay parents, when this is obviously an unusual and highly stressful situation. I don’t know if the study you mentioned accounts for this. Try to look up meta-analyses of same sex parenting outcomes that examine multiple studies, those tend to be more useful than a single study as they reveal statistical trends. This blog post explains the use of them: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/12/beware-the-man-of-one-study/

There’s not a lot of interest in pickiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.