[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password
 (For post deletion)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
New farmhands wanted, click to apply!

File: 1650887104046.png (3.4 KB, 332x122, emoji.png)

No. 31755[Reply]

Hello, this isn't really a complaining thread, but a thread to compile the unfair emoji bans when you use the # < 3 code that turns into ♥ that dumb jannies overlook all the time.
Proof this heart shouldn't be a reason for an emoji ban here:
>>>/meta/6821
Feel free to post your own examples

No. 31756

It shows up as an emoji on some devices so maybe that's what happened. I've personally never been banned for it.

No. 31757

This thread is so pointless. Why do you need a compilation of five million of the same bans?

No. 31758

>>31757
Because mods are dumb, and they need to be reminded.


File: 1646264707040.jpg (378.16 KB, 1800x1013, thegreatfireoflc.jpg)

No. 30359[Reply]

stop ignoring us challenge
1064 posts and 61 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 31754

New thread here: >>>/meta/31751

No. 31759

>>31749
nta but it's possible to dislike two things at once. also i can't tell who's supposed to be the based one in that shitflinging, just see some reeeeing about 'whores' or something

No. 31760

File: 1650902920321.png (157.7 KB, 1289x336, 4-C21-B31-D-6-E2850238956.png)

>>31752
You think posts like these are made by women?

No. 31761

>>31760
NTA but some anons in that thread were defending depp and calling amber whore or prostitute, I called those anons ugly and jealous. They then went onto other threads to cry about how I was a man when in reality they were the ones defending the abuser and laughing about his misogynistic texts and how Amber got hurt.
I definitely think that's a moid though, there are a lot of moids in that thread alone.

No. 34894

>>31760
okay no one on here is actually a woman though(thanks for outing yourself, makes the job easier)


File: 1641364696508.jpg (42.46 KB, 474x490, downloadfile-2.jpg)

No. 28830[Reply]

Because it's been 2 days and admin seems to be asleep
1152 posts and 107 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 30375

>>30374
Sounds like more spam. Those cat spergs should've been banned too.

No. 30376

>>30375
Okay, well, mods aren't gonna ban the cat spergs now. You're a little late for that one.

No. 30377

>>30373
>avatarfagging
Maybe because this isn't even a rule here. You're confusing lolcow with 4chan, Mrs. Want-to-be-janny.
Banning dumbass-shit posting that isn't hostile in any way is just banal and autistic (no offense janny, I get that the europe and celebricows thread is a pain to moderate but that really wasn't necessary).

No. 30378

>>30373
Kek if a retard like you got into such position you'd just ban anyone that annoyed you or broke your made up rules. Go get an actual job if you got so much free time and learn the rules before you beg to be promoted to jannie so you can ban the big bad meanies

No. 30384

>>30373
They were open for literal months on end until just recently, why didn't you apply then?


File: 1645668653648.gif (2.86 MB, 275x264, 1645111353105.gif)

No. 30039[Reply]

Risking a ban to ask this question, should mods start banning the anons who accuse others of being "x" other anon? Example:

>Omg you said this word! You must be x!
>Stop saying (thing I don't like) you must be ____-chan!
>Only ___anon would say that!

I often see these accusations without any basis or proof, and I also see a lot of anons complaining about this calling it annoying. Should mods start enforcing a rule about this? It would honestly prevent so many unnecessary infights with very stubborn anons. This rule would be very similar to how people think x cow is in the thread (omg Lucinda is that you?) Etc.(complaints thread)
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 30057

Yes please

No. 30058

I think it depends on the context and how often the anon does that. A ban would be too much, maybe a warning?

No. 30065

>>30043
there are many "hi cows" and the posts made by scrotes are generally deleted

No. 30074

Yes. It’s annoying when some retard starts tagging multiple anons claiming it’s a single anon. Some people just have very similar typing styles. It’s annoying as hell getting dragged into arguments or berated because a retard thinks you’re another anon. Banning would lessen the infighting.

No. 30075

>This rule would be very similar to how people think x cow is in the thread (omg Lucinda is that you?)
Really bad example


File: 1643295954548.png (427.41 KB, 492x509, Screenshot_12.png)

No. 29010[Reply]

Can I make a thread about Katherine Ann or are mummy vlogger threads not allowed?(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

File: 1641554831073.jpg (72.56 KB, 1080x735, 1629362643188.jpg)

No. 28844[Reply]

Mane a new complaints thread, I have complaints.

No. 28845

does anyone know when new admin was supposed to start cus wtf

No. 28846

Someone already made this thread retard >>>/meta/28830

No. 29029

>>28846
valid complaint


File: 1631739642899.jpg (725.39 KB, 3024x4032, 4isnvvwfz3i41.jpg)

No. 26555[Reply]

3 Rules:
Nicole anon stfu already
No spam
No derailing or infighting
1195 posts and 72 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 28820

Please expose the post history of romanianon and permaban them

No. 28821

jill's thread looks like it's about to fill up with DID munchies…

No. 28822

>>28816
THIS! Delete that fucking shit. Why do you leave it up for them to just do it again 2hours later and have people reply to it to get them even more attention? Just delete it.

No. 28823

>>28820
Elaine’s history hasn’t even been exposed idk why you all think admin will just mark anyone’s posts

No. 28824

>>28821
Jill's thread has so many newfags from tiktok and twitter. I bet 100 dollars that the person she bullied off of tiktok is the one writing those long-ass essay posts about DID. At this point the anons in her thread almost rival her in how eye-roll inducing they are.


File: 1503088395549.jpg (117.59 KB, 632x640, lPlXxHm.jpg)

No. 4559[Reply]

Hello everyone, I'm your new admin!

Regina has been showing me the ropes for the past few weeks and finished transferring everything to me.

I've made a new discord, anyone who wants to join can do so at https://discord.gg/J6zJuXV. You don't need a discord account to join, and there is no longer any verification process.

If you are interested in being a janitor or moderator for the site/discord, please apply here: https://lolcow.typeform.com/to/zD7ZD8

I plan on issuing a survey in the next couple of days to see what direction we want for the site. I want to generally have stricter moderation to cut down on nitpicking of snowflakes and off-topic posts. This will remain a place for free speech, however I'd like to improve the general quality of posts, if possible.

Thanks, and please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions!
22 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 4789

>>4787
We'll look into it, it's likely you might have gotten banned on accident if it was yesterday due to the robots raiding the board.

No. 4842

>>4770

The banner of Logan is still in rotation. Anons in the Raven thread have made several reports and requests to have it removed.

No. 4843

>>4842
I don't see why the banner should be removed just because the relationship is in the past. It's still part of lolcow history and we don't prune content. It's not necessary, but it's not a case of something that should be removed because it's against our rules.

No. 4868

>>4843
Speaking of banners, where do we submit new ones? I thought there was a thread but I couldn't find it here.

No. 4870

>>4868

>>>/meta/962


File: 1442367208864.jpg (40.65 KB, 490x368, townhall.jpg)

No. 1224[Reply]

Last night, we held a pretty productive chat in https://chat.lolcow.farm/r/meta about site policies and what sort of threads belong in /snow/. I may do another one tonight.

I'd like to start doing these once every 1 or 2 weeks. Some chats may have specific topics. Otherwise, you can just ask me general questions about the site and discuss the state of it and its future.

I will also try to post transcripts for each chat, possibly with some off-topic discussion removed, for people who are unable to join at that time. Note that a lot of off-topic discussion is still in these transcripts, so apologies if you have to sift through a lot of irrelevant material.

Town Hall #1 - 9/14/15: http://pastebin.com/rt4QLix2

No. 1229

just curious, why does it stop halfway through the chat?
i'm not well-versed in pastebin, is there more or is that all there is?

No. 1232

>>1229
I cut out everything after that point in the chat, because I consider it too off-topic. No real discussion of moving threads happened after then.

No. 1249

I plan on holding a town hall once every Wednesday evening, Eastern time. Next one will be tomorrow, September 23.

No. 1466

>>1249
Will you continue to update the chatlogs for those of us who aren't online at the time?

No. 1784

We have stopped doing these once per week. I usually announce them 2 days in advance, and just do them when I feel like it, or if something important is going on. I may go back to a standard schedule soon.

Still deciding on the best way to handle chat logs.


File: 1545297857031.jpg (41.08 KB, 472x599, 1438090634461.jpg)

No. 7764[Reply]

What's the difference between Lowcow and Crystal Cafe?

No. 7772

one is openly full of trannies, the other isn't

No. 7796

>>7764

Their site actually functions.

No. 7799

>>7796
the only positive of having a site full of trannies. you will never have to worry about tech shit going awry because every single one of them majored in comp sci.

No. 7906

>>7799
>well-run site made by women must be secretly run by men

do any of you even listen to yourselves

No. 7931

>>7906
take a joke, autist. good lord…

and to call cc well-run is a reach. anything would appear well-run compared to this dump.


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Search
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]