File: 1690747299045.gif (300.86 KB, 640x358, 122366329.gif)
No. 60569
This is a containment thread for meta discussion that doesn't fall into complaints and suggestions. Feel free to tinfoil or talk about the state of the site but try to avoid being too autistic.
If cerbmin needs to hear it, post it here.
Previous responses to anons:
>>57339 moderation practices, poll and site statistics
>>57739 hiring staff, moderation practices, addition of newfag label
>>58335 locking of jvloggers thread, /shay/ users posting their nudes
>>58364 new jannies are hired
>>58489 moderation practices and automatic moderation
>>58669 rita/whiteglove post history reveal
>>58949 janny is removed for leaking IP history, several threads are locked due to attracting racebaiting retards
>>59063>>59172 some info about LCF 2.0
>>60076 the moderation policy towards redditspacing is relaxed as a result of hellweek discussion
Previous thread:
>>56933 No. 60572
As a general update for transparency, there have been several technical changes to moderation tools on the site over the past few weeks, with the aim to improve the response time to CSAM and raids and to minimize how many users are exposed to them. There have also been some updates to the moderation panel to make it easier for farmhands to do their job. There are a few minor updates planned to the current site (such as improvements to embedding and further improvements to mod tools) and after that, 100% of the development time will be spent on LCF 2.0.
>>60366The current wording of the KOSA bill means that it only applies to for-profit organizatons. LCF is run by volunteers and does not make money, so we would not be affected by the bill in its present state.
>>60398False moid accusations are not generally bannable unless they become disruptive or are clearly malicious/bait. They are a pain in the ass, and we have discussed making them bannable in the same way that "hi cow" is because they shit up threads and the report system, but we also don't want to discourage legitimate reports and identifying blatantly male posters. We're keeping an eye on it and may change our approach to it in the future.
>>60502In reponse to this and the general discussion of the decay of our board culture, as long time users of the site we are all aware of this issue too. We welcome any suggestions from anons for ways to mitigate this, as there is only so much that moderation can do.
No. 60574
>>60572>we also don't want to discourage legitimate reports and identifying blatantly male posters. but directly replying to stuff you think is bait is bannable, and direct replies to accuse anons of being men
is directly replying to bait. in fact, making that kind of "call out" bannable and instead promoting reporting instead will help prevent derailing and infighting. the use of redtext and deleting obvious bait will also help. i feel like you guys are bending too much to the will of the users instead of making logical choices.
No. 60578
>>60577I agree, as ayrt
We don't need to brag we just mind our own business. Thanks for the update cerbmin.
No. 60591
>>60574The only time someone gets accused of being a man is if they're baiting or being racist. Stop doing those two and you won't get accused anymore. Baiters always come here and request that the anons who call them moids to be banned, it won't happen. Just stop baiting.
>>60590I agree with this. Also racebait should have longer bans.
No. 60594
>>60590would be nice to see the actual bait or derailing post redtexted instead of people replying to it. Especially when anons correct someone with facts or proof and get a ban.
There are some insane mods who let contentless WKing or pointless defending stand while banning any discussion of the cow. Would like that to stop too.
No. 60602
>>60591>The only time someone gets accused of being a man is if they're baiting or being racist. Incorrect.
I was accused of being an american scrote (?!) the other day when I was venting about the quran burning drama in my country, Sweden and how we now have a threat of terrorism against us. I said I hated the situation and was anxious because I live in a big city. I got anons saying it was racebait. Because what? Muslim scrotes are involved? Islam is not a race. Surely responding like that is some cruel baiting itself.
No. 60617
>>60610There's one anon that let's pakichan live rent free in her head.
>>60615Racebait is a specific type of posting that involves prejudice, negative stereotyping or insults against a certain race. Expressing an emotion towards a recent event is not racebait.
No. 60630
>>60618Nta but Muslims aren't a race and we should be able to critise religion here. No one bats an eyelid when someone brings up Catholics or Christfags so it's ridiculous to extend race privileges to a religion followed by all races, not just people from the Middle East. That being said I've seen instances of what you're talking about but in the same vein I've also seen instances where anons insist
valid critic is racially motivated to derail conversation and bait infighting.
No. 60645
>>60617Didn't you assume the nonwhite immigrants were terrorists in your post as you detailed
>>60602 ?
Also if you believed a group was a serious threat, why would you support provocative actions towards them?
>>60618Right. There's always one racist anon and one selfhating nonwhite anon who keep derailing whenever race related topics come up. That's why they're banned. No one here can have a civil discussion related to race.
No. 60647
File: 1690891607629.png (79.29 KB, 742x815, news.png)
>>60645The person you replied to wasn't me, who wrote the orginal vent post here >>>1647613
You misread my original post completely.
You are the only one talking about race. And you do not understand the situation here at all.
Here are some english language sources if someone is actually interested in understanding what is going on right now.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/20/protesters-angered-by-quran-burning-storm-swedens-embassy-in-baghdadhttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/27/swedish-pm-extremely-worried-about-quran-burning-protestshttps://www.reuters.com/world/europe/sweden-present-security-measures-amid-koran-burning-crisis-2023-08-01/Also the
victim complex on social media is a reference to posts like these
https://twitter.com/MikailPNyuksel/status/1685225494424203264Politician complaining that little girls can't be forced to wear hijab in schools and that funded to mosques overseas were shut down after it was found out that the money went to terrorist organisations.
No. 60648
File: 1690892062945.png (21.11 KB, 844x231, Skärmbild 2023-08-01 141207.pn…)
>>60647Well I fucked up the link to the other thread.
Here is a screencap. Perhaps people read the first line and thought that I somehow agreed with the racist Dane's dumb actions. Obviously I am not, I'm pissed that this drama is happening in my country which has led to threats to my entire country from example Hizbollah. And that you can't even went about it on LC of all places because someone who can't read think it's racebait. Maybe the farmhands can clarify what racebait is so people get it.
No. 60653
File: 1690903376518.png (650.06 KB, 910x711, iraqi-moids.png)
>>60648To further prove the point that this is nothing to do with race and therefore not racebait. The men burning the Qoran in Sweden are Iraqi refugees.
https://www.euronews.com/2023/07/31/iraqi-refugees-set-fire-to-quran-outside-swedish-parliament-in-stockholm No. 60655
>>60654Agreed.
>calling an anon a moid because it is an actual moidReplying to a moid which is replying to bait which is bannable
>calling an anon a moid because of a disagreementBaiting and infighting both of which are bannable
I don't see a scenario where it shouldn't result in a ban.
No. 60665
>>60663Adding to this, the impossibility of the site being entirely free of men is why I and many oldfags were so resistant to radfem/manhate being promoted here, not the posters but it being outside of containment. Their userbase oftend demands things that simply aren't possible and they react to the reality of the situation the most poorly. I don't want men here, but I at least understand the limitations of exterminating them and the freedoms the site provides us as women. I just feel like many anons need to not take the site so seriously as a bastion for women, when it has no safety net due to anonymous posting. We
will get raided, there
will be moids infiltrating the site we
will get to freely talk about female issues and hate trannies without fear. It's like part of the price of freedom.
No. 60666
>>60662>>60664let's be real it's not even just racebait, you might get called a moid for the even most innocuous things if there's an anon who is really willing to die on that hill. if not a troll or actual moid accusing others of being moids because it's so ridiculously easy to start shit here through this method.
>>60663>>60665Very true unfortunately. As much as there is need for female-oriented spaces that do not cater to males, including pronouned males, an imageboard (public and supposed to be by default anonymous), especially a gossip imageboard is maybe just not the ideal format for that.
>limitations of exterminating [moids] and the freedoms the site provides us as womenAs long as most anons have yet to understand this every single splinter imageboard that promotes itself as being "by women for women" will have such problems with bait to some extent.
No. 60669
>>60665Stop making out scrotes are some fucking James bond types infiltrating the site. They're gay cunts and any suspected male post should be reported and banned. The containment threads were stupid as if man hate won't spill into other threads. Living amongst men is a fucking drag and ruins so many facets of life. Calling anons sensitive because of hostile language towards men lol
I mean there's a fag rn attempting to bait on /ot
The issue with this site is that it's been harvested by drama channels and such that it's more popular than it was in 2014. Oldfags were better at hazing newfags and encouraging retards to lurk before posting. Integration isn't happening because the culture is changing due to twitterfags and kiwifags
No. 60674
>>60653>>60647>>60648You're trying to stir this same shit about muh quran burning episode even here in /meta/ of all places spamming multiple posts about it and you still don't understand why racebaiting is banned? This is why, people like you can't let it go and need to "be heard" all the fucking time i.e. machine gun fire posts about how the western society is under attack from evil pedophile muslim migrants and how "nobody is talking about it" despite you having the entirety of internet except maybe twitter to doompost about it. You even have an whole ass thread on the hidden board and you still choose to go link spam in threads around the site.
>>60671This, Seal-chan being another example. A shocking amount of the most racist and xenophobic people with internalized self loathing are insecure about their own mixed/ethnic background so it's not a get out of racist jail card to claim being non-white.
No. 60680
File: 1690974343241.png (79.28 KB, 615x289, white.png)
>>60679no, she's just one of those white people who happen to look somewhat Asian
No. 60710
File: 1691041872281.png (59.13 KB, 2692x140, Screenshot 2023-08-02 at 10.52…)
Allowing links to questionable 4chan porn seems like a very slippery slope
No. 60718
>>60710Agree.
>>60714Stop. You guys been talking about this topic in ot, meta and 2X for a whole week. Why are you trying so hard to infight about a certain topic?
No. 60721
>>60720You've been mentioning the same topic for at least 10 times yet no one wants to discuss it with you here, when will you stop? If you didn't intend to infight, you wouldn't mention it on here or on random threads and go back to meta to cry whenever people called you out.
Stick to r/exmuslim or r/atheist if you want to discriminate against minorities jews and muslims without backlash.
No. 60733
>>60577>>60578That anon clearing up the point - been here longer than I care to admit and miss the other oldfags. We had a good thing, once.
My specific complaint there was that I have noticed an uptick in anons claiming to be deep in LC lore, calling others summerfags, etc and then saying they've been here since 2020 or so. As one of you said, it's not something we brag about but the newer ones love to.
/derail
>>60667They said "I and many". Sorry you feel sensitive being called out as an exception. All those years, those threads were banned because we knew damn well what it would lead to. They get opened up and surprise, surprise it plays out just as expected.
>>60715Maybe Miranda is back kek
No. 60734
>>60728Are you aware there are many different posters on this website?
>>60729Islam is also a religion that, to use other anon's words, discriminates against women, little girls, homosexuals, atheists and free speech. I will stop criticing it when it stops that shit.
No. 60735
>>60572Admin(s), please … lead us. You run the boards. You don't need to be people pleasers. This is not a forum for healthy, reasonable, well-adjusted people. It's an imageboard for spergs, autists and psychos. And asking for suggestions or soliciting advice is only ever going to attract a tiny portion of the userbase. The townhall years ago that spawned /w/ and /m/ had less than 100 anons voting and that's assuming no socks or bots. Userbase was way bigger then.
Think back to how this place used to be and why. Discuss it among yourselves. Then try to move it in that direction. Don't let the inmates keep running the asylum. That leads to silliness like 'reddit spacing'. And you should definitely harden up on the moid accusations. We all saw how bad it got when it was 'hi tranny' instead. And given the mood of the site these days, there's absolutely zero chance it would discourage legit reporting.
No. 60737
>>60736On 2X, she also said that if the muslim women and small children face bad conditions in life they must've deserved it. She's only been complaining about Muslim women in there so I doubt her issue is with men.
She even said she'd cut off all her fingers instead of helping a Muslim child in a bad situation which really weird me out. If a child is in a bad situation I don't think anyone would question their race or religion before attempting to help them unless they harbor hate for specific groups of people just for being born into that group.
That's why I'm thinking it's a racebaiter instead of an anon who's arguing peacefully.
No. 60738
>>60735ngl I wouldn't blame the new admin for being wary of enacting sweeping changes that could alienate lolcow's user base, if that's what is going on here. iirc there have been a few previous admins who took the site in a direction the user base didn't want and it led to quite a bit of dropoff in interaction, to say the least. that said, the constant infighting and lack of transparency around moderation and bans, as well as asking for input from users to correct long-standing issues about board culture instead of laying down those corrections themselves, is also just as likely to drive off what remains of the user base.
look, I get that tard wrangling isn't easy. I get that this is both a thankless and unpaid position. but sooner or later the admin must take a stand for what is acceptable, expected, and encouraged on lolcow, and stick by it. I get that their resources are likely being eaten up on developing lolcow 2.0, but a new site doesn't guarantee a clean slate, and I hope the admin and mod team are actually thinking about what sort of posters will be following them there.
transparency, accountability, and fairness should be expected from the mod team. and the admin must verbalize and demonstrate what sort of behavior is acceptable and even exemplary for this board. as an admin, you will sometimes end up making decisions that are not popular but are still the right path forward. and it's fucking trite but the admin needs to be a leader and not just someone who's in charge.
No. 60802
>>60790>(which includes crying about being called a moid instead of just ignoring it)Why do some anons defend the right to do this so fiercely when absolutely nothing good ever comes from it? It's a crutch used by newfags who can't deal with anonymous discussion and can't cope with seeing different opinions. It's also innately misogynistic because it implies that women are basic hivemind incapable of independent thought and it disregards the various lived experiences of women that lead to the formation of different opinions.
Purely from a moderation stand point it is a behaviour that causes more problems than it solves. If it's a moid, the moid has achieved it's aim of getting female attention and is now going to come back to get more, if it's not a moid, it's inflammatory bait that causes infights. It also creates an easily exploitable fracture point with which to subvert any thread. Troons have already openly admitted to using it with great success. The need to ban false moid accusations is so obvious that it's tempting to suspect that anyone defending it is a tranny or moid themselves.
No. 60803
>>60802There's always one anon who makes an outlandish post then comes to meta to cry when anon say she thinks or acts like a moid. I've only been accused of being a moid 3 times or so and I've been using this website for 5+ years, if this is common occurrence for you, you're the problem and you're probably one of the lesser liked posters.
There literally used to be a "female" poster calling anons whores, cocksuckers, prostitutes, etc. and preaching about how biology makes men superior. Are you really surprised that anons like this will get accused of being male?
No. 60805
>>60803>There's always one anonThis is first post I've made on the subject in this thread and no one has accused me of being a moid. You're deluded if you think only one person can see that it's destructive.
>thinks or acts like a moidHow is this defined?
>I've been using this website for 5+ yearsDoubt. Anyone who has been here for that long will know that this has only been a reoccurring issue in the past few years and was at one point completely absent.
>you're probably one of the lesser liked postersThis is an anonymous website with no way for users to discern who they are actually talking to so how would anyone form an opinion of anyone else outside of specific and isolated interactions? It's possible that you could be in another thread where I agree with you or we could be both contributing to a thread on a subject matter that we both enjoy, while disagreeing in /meta/.
>Are you really surprised that anons like this will get accused of being male?If you genuinely suspect a poster of being a moid report and ignore. Admins and farmhands are able to check post history and see information such as device and IP address that will enable them to come to a more accurate conclusion. Accusing someone of being a moid doesn't achieve anything.
No. 60807
>>60805Stop the weird spacing, stop baiting. Moid accusations will never be banned, if you're butthurt leave the site, not like any anon who constantly gets those accusations could provide anything positive to the site.
Also it's good to point out the anon is a moid without replying with anything else, that way no one replies or argues with the male and the bait goes ignored. It takes several hours for mods to sometimes see and remove male/bait posts, you cant just lose your shit because one anon warned others of your baity posts so it wouldn't derail the thread until mods took care of it.
No. 60808
>>60802Again, just ignore it. Either you get called moid because your posts sound like one, in which case you should reflect on yourself, or the other poster is just being retarded and wants to bait you, in which case you should ignore it like any other insult. This is like getting
triggered over getting called a retard, I have no idea why you get so worked up over it if you're truly a woman.
In the same breath, I really enjoy trannies seething over getting clocked here. Once I thought we're being invaded and looked at the archives of their 4chan board and lo and behold, there were several posts of them crying about not even passing on an anonymous imageboard like this one. Our resident cp spamming tranny also hates it for that reason. If you don't call them out, they start to feel welcome and if you make it banable, they will start reporting every post recognizing them as males.
No. 60809
>>60806>Stop the weird spacingThis is how to quote and reply on an image board.
>Moid accusations will never be bannedIt already has been. Burritomin attempted to ban it but due to her difficulties with moderating the site it was only implemented for a short time. She even closed /ot/ because of how bad the infighting became. You would know this if you had been here as long as you claim. The precedent of banning false accusations already exists when accusing other posters of being a cow was banned on /pt/ and /snow/.
>if you're butthurt leave the siteI'm suggesting a way to improve the site. The false moid accusation issue has been ongoing for years and it is now used by men and trannies to subvert the site.
>not like any anon who constantly gets those accusations could provide anything positive to the siteAgain how do you make judgements over who contributes what on an anonymous website? What if an anon contributes milk on a cow board and then gets accused of being a moid on /ot/? It seems extremely ironic coming from someone that thinks derailing threads by using false accusations is a positive contribution.
>Also it's good to point out the anon is a moid without replying with anything elseIt's good to point it out to the mods which is why you report and ignore. Pointing it out in thread does nothing because the other posters in the thread do not have the ability to ban the potential moid. The accusation is also likely to inaccurate because you as a poster do not have any information about who is making that post.
>the bait goes ignoredCalling someone a moid is replying to bait if it's a male and it's also posting bait if the accusation is wrong.
>so it wouldn't derail the threadBut the exact opposite happens. Accusing another poster of being a moid creates more mess for the mods to clean up. Report and ignore. If it's a moid the farmhands will deal with it, if it isn't and is just a woman with a shit take, the thread isn't derailed into who is and isn't a moid.
>>60808>Either you get called moid because your posts sound like oneDefine what moid like posts are? Outside of the obvious, what does a moid post?
>Our resident cp spamming tranny also hates it for that reasonBlaine admitted to using false moid accusations to cause chaos and make the site difficult to moderate and it works. For this reason alone it needs to be banned.
>If you don't call them outReport and ignore. Calling them out is giving them what they want. It gives them the attention they're looking for, encourages them to come back and it derails threads. Getting ignored and then getting banned is the worst outcome for them.
No. 60815
File: 1691164047870.png (75.82 KB, 1822x1074, 1680993052375.png)
>>60809Very interesting how you keep ignoring half of the sentences you reply to just to repeat the same mantra as you did for 3 threads now. If you aren't a moid, there's no reason for you to get so upset you over it you want whole words banned. I see no one advertising for the use of newfag to get banned, even if it can be used as bait/insult. I get that it can be annoying if you're rilled up over a discussion, but you always have the option to just ignore whenever someone is baiting or insulting you.
>Blaine admitted to using false moid accusations to cause chaos and make the site difficult to moderate and it works. Yes, because he thinks it makes us seethe as much as it makes him seethe. And no, it's not successful because he's too low IQ to understand why posters get called moids so he literally just does it completely at random.
He also has been caught doing that and then advertising for farmers to stop calling out moids here on meta. He also did the same retarded psyop with calling him out with his name, like in
>>57766>>57779And then there's also posters like:
>>55299 No. 60819
File: 1691169091473.jpg (63.14 KB, 930x360, RaceBait.jpg)
Obvious racebait in vent, possibly also a male.
No. 60820
File: 1691170557633.png (193.79 KB, 829x501, Screenshot_20230804-193126.png)
Admin, please know that the person who is hell-bent on getting some /w/ threads closed wants Dakota's locked as well. That should be automatically suspicious, as the thread is glacially slow but as Dakota is a legacy cow, there's no way her thread should be closed. Lately posts have been popping up there and in Kiki's thread about how they are both not hurting anyone and so their threads should be locked. This isn't how threads work. There aren't only 3-4 people posting on /w/, come on now.
I do think this poster has a relationship with your /w/ mod, so please pay attention to that situation. There are a lot of clues and repeated words, the obsession with nitpicking and Belle and Vloggers in Japan. idk what's going on but this is really something for Admin to look at so I'm putting it here.
I'd like to know what Admin think is "nitpicking" and "derail" because this has yet to be defined recently and bans are handed out over these things regularly in /w/. Some threads never have these bans, and a certain handful are full of them. Could Admin weigh in?
No. 60821
>>60815>Very interesting how you keep ignoring half of the sentencesWhat have I ignored? Not one single question that I asked has been answered, where as I made the effort to quote and reply to the parts of the post that I disagreed with.
>If you aren't a moid, there's no reason for you to get so upsetI'm not sure why you keep accusing me of being emotional when I'm not. I'm simply asking why accusing other posters of being moids needs to be enshrined as some holy right bestowed by the mods when it clearly has no positive outcome. It isn't effective at deterring moids because it gives them the attention they're looking for. Report and ignore.
>Yes, because he thinks it makes us seethe as much as it makes him seetheI doubt that he cares. His motivation is gaining female attention and causing disruption so the site becomes more difficult to moderate and more difficult to maintain. Interacting with him in any way is giving him exactly what he wants. Ignore him and report it to the mods so he can be banned just like any other moid. I don't understand why some anons are so hell bent on interacting with men on a site for women.
>>60816>alienating moidsBut it doesn't. Moids don't care that we hate them and don't want them here. They already know this and that is why they keep coming back. It gives them a sense of satisfaction to know that they have come here and caused upset. Giving them no attention by not interacting with them at all and reporting them so they can be banned is what needs to be done. If anons stop giving them what they want, then they will stop attempting to post here.
No. 60827
>>60823Samefag, but anon knows this probably because the posters always get called out. Saying you don't think threads with little milk need new thread isn't a new sentiment 9n lolcow as a whole.
>>>/meta/59143 Mod pointing at the bad attempt to pretend theres a mass amount of people who definitely aren't nitpicking. You have to deal with the fact that nitpicking endlessly will give you bans if you keep it up and threads that are all nitpicking really don't deserve new threads, legacy or not. Anons can have those opinions in the personal opinions threads kek Some cows go off into obscurity and that's okay. They can easily fall into group threads like "fashion and style vloggers".
No. 60828
>>60821>I think x because of y, an example of it is z>nuh uh! Amazing. Anons in. the past 2 times you derailed meta with this already answered you. No amount of spamming and retarded psyops will change how imageboard users want their board culture to be. Either deal with it or leave.
>>60820That anons constantly derails on /ot/ about every thread she doesn't like and the sassy twitter lingo always leaks through her posts.
>>60824>there are no other instances in which moid is directed at other anonsBait. As for the rest, I (and other anons) already said why I think moids should be called out and named examples of how certain moids react to it. Infighting is against the rules, not wanting men/trannies here is not.
No. 60829
>>60820I have not seen the situation that anon is talking about bc I haven't been able to go on /w/ lately, but from what she is saying about the Dakota thread alone, I agree this poster is suspicious. Not to mention Kiki, I mean, come on.
I do want to bring up the glaring mod issue: they fucking suck. They're unfair, they don't enforce rules consistently, and there is blatant favoritism. I will often report obvious bait or even both sides of an infight, and it will be ignored. Even worse, only one half of the infight gets banned.
And I hate the "oh well maybe they got banned somewhere else on the board" excuse. Okay well the other nonnas who brought it up in this thread are right; every post that results in moderation needs to be redtexted. Expecting us to just take jannies' word for it that they're definitely doing what's best for the board after the influx of shit tier bans lately is ridiculous. At this point, I do think mods are posting on the board and then using their status to shit on people who disagree with them. I'm tired of it.
No. 60905
>>60878the choachan admins never knew who was spamming them, most likely lied about several factors leading to their closing, and unironically claimed a stalker of 3 years infiltrated staff and hacked admins devices before leaving the final msg that "no accounts were compromised"
good credibility there, fuck off
No. 60910
File: 1691399835397.png (605.71 KB, 2034x686, ccc_last_post.png)
>>60908> I only know what some of the actual female imageboard admins have told me anons should know that whenever these specific tinfoils are being peddled, they likely come from the same two clowns that said all of this, then redacted their statements with "I'm not sure"
No. 60911
>>60908samefag, i'm curious because i was abruptly removed from staff team in june and permabanned for from what i can tell no reason and i never sought any answers, i just figured the board owner found me to be an annoying poster and wanted to get rid of me. she said "we all know what you've been doing" when i literally hadn't been doing anything and at some point was coming on the site like once a month because i was busy with school and life in general. the admin also knew my real name and would sometimes try to intimidate me by replying to my posts using my real name whenever i made a post that she didn't like kek. but anyway when i got removed from staff just like that i took that as my cue to leave the site all together, only to find out here that ccc shut down. i wasn't on the staff for anywhere close to 3 years though, more like 1.5. and i definitely didn't "hack admins devices" nor have the tech knowledge to do so kek.
>>60909>i kicked him from staff in mayokay, this must've been about another staff member then, though i don't remember anyone being kicked out from the discord
No. 60916
>>60738>>60790This is what I'm questioning though. What even is the userbase anymore? 'old faithful' threads like Moo are basically dead. Granted, a lot of the posting was just haha she's fat and shit at cosplay but still, they were burning through threads in a matter of days. Same with the shaytards. The active threads seem to need intros that include a lot of directions about how to use the site (and a lot of frustration about it). A lot of the time it feels like there's more tourists than regular farmers.
So yeah, I'd be fine with a smaller userbase if it was like hellweek but not a watered down version, to reset things. Quality over quantity any day of the week. If this site doesn't know what it wants to be anymore and the admins are just going to flip flop making rulings and then reversing them, what's the future for LC?
No. 60918
>>60917i can't say anything for sure because i honestly have no idea what any of this "moid inflitrating staff" lore is, because it wasn't brought to our attention in the discord at any point when i was a staff. i'm not sure if admins discussed these things among themselves privately because they thought one of the janis in the regular discord was a moid or something.
the board owner did tell us around april or so that she was going to take measures to try to stop the constant spam that we were getting and if it wouldn't stop she would probably shut down the site. no stalker moid mentioned.
what i do know is that my real name that i accidentally revealed in discord one time was used against me quite a few times, thankfully only my first name and no one really gave a fuck (neither did i at the time) but i still thought it was a bit fucked up of her.
for some reason i trusted her and the rest of the mods to not do anything with it or any of my personal information (including ip and other details about my life that she probably knew from constantly looking at my post history) and honestly this was one of the reasons why i didn't try to fight being removed from the staff team, i was worried that if i push any further and write a post about it on /meta/ she was going to straight up dox me because she believes i was an "infiltrator" or whatever. so i continued posting as normal and like a week later i was permabanned with no ban reason stated. then i left.
whether the stalker moid exists or not i'm not sure but i definitely wasn't one of his sock accounts kek…
No. 60921
File: 1691415932997.gif (998.26 KB, 498x359, Popcorn Bobby GIF - Popcorn Bo…)
The choachan admin is a farmer, right? I personally think she should just come here and tell us her side of the story.
No. 60922
>>60920to be fair to them i don't have a social media presence under my full name so i don't think they could find anything substantial. if they asked for a hand pic with a time stamp i could've given them that kek
>>60921honestly i think she's moved on and so had i but when i saw on here that there were claims of a deranged moid on the staff team it rubbed me the wrong way that the posters (presuming i am the "moid jani" she mentioned) thought some deranged guy had access to their personal information. i was an annoying poster and incompetent staff at worst and never had any ill intention. i had a lot of fun on there over the years and never wanted anything bad to happen to the site or its posters, especially since female only ibs are so rare.
at least in the end they said "no accounts were hacked and no ips were leaked" and i hope that calmed down any of the posters that were worried about it.
No. 60926
>>60916Moo had exeptional milk, are you kidding? She constantly had something going on whether its stealing, pretending to be nude for porn, scamming through her patreon for 2 years, working with shitty harassers like Leon Chiro, her fake made cosplays that got leaked other people made them, her obvious attempts at trying to go over someone's work [KBBQ], the video saga stuff, starting OF and laughing at how far she goes, her ghosting cons, sponsors pulling out from helping her for a short while, her miserable Stay-At-Home con segment, the entire camversity thing was repetitively milky because she wouldn't shut up about her dad… Anon, the thread is slow now because she's stopped making a lot of shit public, but it's not all making fun of her being fat at all. In fact, there's rules you can't nitpick that unless it's regarding new posts due to how ill-fitting she usually makes her cosplays, but otherwise no one mentions it even then sometimes. Also the rule about nitpicking her tit vein and stuff. Moo's thread is moderated well which is how a /pt/ thread should be. Moo is one of the rare cows on this site that's been continuously milky.
No. 60930
>>60921I don't believe they're farmers or they'd know how to present drama. This has been going on for months without a single decipherable summary or greentext or whatever the fuck and whenever these retards come around they just shitpost more vague gay bait to announce themselves. See
>>60927They're probably a bunch of newfags who found lolcow from Tiktok or the Creepshow Art outing, we already know they don't know shit about imageboards because there were posts from someone who spoke up about having to build choachan for them and then getting treated similarly to
>>60918.
No. 60933
>>60930"autiny" is a nickname for fans of a kpop group called ateez. "autiny jani" was a running joke/not joke for some posters, about how there is a jani that is an autiny and goes out of her way to be a nuisance and be more lenient towards other "autinys", only ban people who shat on her favorite group etc…
ccc had a big personalityfagging problem and there were always people trying to connect posts to people, figure out which posters the staff members were etc… if you regularly posted a kpop idol you were labeled as the "(kpop idol) poster", there wasn't really an escape from it. probably the reason this autiny jani shit started
No. 60946
>>60945I can't even imagine why anyone would want to talk to this site's user base as a group
like just punch yourself in the kidneys, it's the same amount of fun
No. 60948
>>60938Not a good idea, last time the majority of the discord weren't even farmers.
>>60946I don't understand why anyone would visit and post on a website made for discussion if they don't like the userbase.
No. 60960
File: 1691599488309.jpg (108.45 KB, 1025x403, reportingabuse.jpg)
I use a VPN and catch other people's bans sometimes, so I don't know who this was actually for.
But really? You're going to smack us for "reporting abuse" after leaving /ot/ unmoderated and rife with infighting for days? And most of those posts were never dealt with?
I've reported posts multiple times if I run out of room in the "reason" section (because that isn't very long!), or because I accidentally submitted a report early on mobile. Does that count as "reporting abuse"? Multiple anons have admitted to spamming reports on a post until it gets taken down in /meta/ before, so clearly not all report spammers are the same in mods' eyes.
>one is enough for infighting of all things
Mods could try actually moderating the infighting, but that would be too hard, I guess.
No. 60962
>>60960The new jannies seem very into banning, and don't seem to know that you can check post history
I don't use a VPN, and I've been banned for completely innocuous shit unrelated to gender for being a tranny, like literally a completely unrelated post, like where it doesn't make sense that the ban reason is "tranny"
No. 60971
>>60969Are you new? That's not how it works.
>>60967Yes, I agree but it seems like one anon didn't know that
No. 61008
>>60988This anon is probably lying. I was in japanons server and there was one anon in her 30-40s who was obsessed with japanon. She stalked japanons socials until she found pictures of her underage, her name, her old accounts and even told me she found her nudes.
This person is obsessed with bib/japanon for some reason and attempts to accuse her of being pedo because japanon dated a 19 year old or something when she was 21 or something.
No. 61019
>>61018Is it the Regina George larper from this thread?
>>>/ot/733281She matches the description esp the Elaine drama.
No. 61025
>>61020>>61018why would E or B know about japanon unless someone told her about it? It seems like multiple anons in a offshoot server have a vendetta against her where they try to point her out in threads while posting tinfoils that japanon is a mod on lc and cc
it's very transparent tbh
No. 61051
>>61045i don't think there's any jan'ies in /ot/ at all atm. there's bait all iver the place, ibvious scrote, and a massive infight that has been going on for hours in the crime thread, but the reports do nothing and there's not a redtext in sight
the "rapesock" bait poster has even been posting here woth no mod reaction
No. 61062
File: 1691870739685.png (5.04 KB, 225x225, Untitled(9).png)
>>61061thank you for your service
No. 61065
>>61061>>61064You're acting as if the post wasn't made by a literal mod or a vpn-fag whose post history would obviously be mixed. Literally every anon that called it out got banned but it didn't.
You guys are being weird today, there was a literal Indian moid who posted for several hours about how Indian men are hot, deserve blue eyed blonde haired white women and disagreeing is racism yet you're still not banning the weirdly misogynistic posts but banning anons for "infighting" when they disagree with your decisions.
No. 61067
>>61065can someone please repost the "punching bag" explanation
they got banned for infighting and misunderstanding intentionally to do it
No. 61099
>>61096That wasn't me. I was banned before that.
>>61097Why does it take mods a day and 10 additional bans to ban an obvious male poster? I doubt the ban is even as long as the ban they gave other farmers.
No. 61106
>>61100The funny part is how she is intentionally misrepresenting every post she is getting mad about.
The initial rapesock post was in response to a news article about a woman who had a near drowning incident when she was 2 or 3 years old, and was kept in a vegetative state in hospital since, where she was repeatedly raped while in coma.
>>>/ot/1660589An anon gives more information on the case, and it is revealed the the mother of the girl had filed a request to have the
victim only cared for by female employees in 2002 (17 years before the story breaks in 2019) because of previous assaults.
>>>/ot/1662497The original comment was made out of disgust for the parents who essentially kept their daughter in a coma for 27 years (initially thought by op to be only 14 years as this was posted before the above post with more info) to be used as a, well.
>>>/ot/1660600She is also lying about another anon's post:
>an anon in the same thread claims rape is natural and nature hates us women but doesn't get bannedAn article was posted about a woman with PPD who killed her three children with cable ties.
>>>/ot/1658908It comes to light she went through IVF about 17 times.
>>>/ot/1658920Anon posts that children who are conceived through IVF are soulless
>>>/ot/1660560After anons disagree, she doubles down and also implies that children conceived through rape are either partially soulless or do not have souls at all
>>>/ot/1660910Either a second anon or anon samefagging herself maintains that most people are soulless, and especially people conceived under "unnatural circumstances"
>>>/ot/1662245In response, nonnas point out that not only are many people born from rape, especially in societies where it was acceptable, but rape often occurs between animals in nature.
>>>/ot/1662442>>>/ot/1662712>>>/ot/1663026And anon is still in the thread insisting that rape isn't natural, and in fact, most rape babies are killed.
>>>/ot/1663012>>>/ot/1663037In case anyone was curious, pregnancy by rape occurs at the same rate as pregnancy by consensual sex.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_from_rape>The current scientific consensus is that rape is at least as likely to lead to pregnancy as consensual sexual intercourse, with some studies suggesting rape may actually result in higher rates of pregnancy than consensual intercourse.Sorry for the long post, I just figured I'd provide the context and links for anybody who was curious but doesn't want to read through a million infighting posts and sperging. Please excuse any incorrect links, I tried my best.
In short, it is anons (or a singular anon) being asshurt about getting told to stop being weird, and then dragging it out into other threads. And accusing everybody who is annoyed with them of samefagging or being dirty mods, kek
No. 61123
>>61122?
It sounds like other people have told you to shut up too, cuz I don't even have any opinions on ivf
No. 61138
>>60963>>60972I'm late to this but I'm honestly starting to suspect that powertripping jannies (or janny?) are the ones instigating retarded infights and then handing out bans to people telling them off. It can't be a coincidence that some unhinged, overly aggressive anon keeps going for literally hours while people disagreeing with her suddenly report being banned for a single post with some equally bitchy ban message but no redtext so it's clearly some janny trying to be sneaky. Admin should check her staff's behavior and find out if there's a pattern of abusing their power or being too
trigger happy with bans due to misunderstanding or misreading posts.
No. 61140
File: 1692010838644.png (80.03 KB, 1080x390, 1692009309883(1).png)
/ot/ is getting infight-spammed, and someone has posted screenshots from r9k, saying that it's probably the spammer
No. 61143
>>61138>equally bitchy ban message"Bitchy" ban messages have always been around, you are being overly sensitive. Are you the person who won't stop shitting up news stories that fuck with you in /ot/ and keeps complaining about mods when you get banned for sperging.
>>61139I'm starting to think it's a coverage issue. The morning after the huge meltdown in /ot/ a couple days ago, a mod was cleaning the board out for hours (infights I reported were getting almost instant redtexts) and admin issued bans for the rapesock drama.
I'd help out, but I was never contacted. I guess my app didn't make the cut kek
No. 61146
>>61142my bad
>>61143deleted my reply cuz it was blogposty; I really want to re-apply but I dunno if they'd take someone back who was already on board
No. 61147
>>61145Yeah, I think the /ot/ mod either wasn't around for a few days or was seriously slacking, so they had to play catch up.
>>61146Do you mean somebody who was on the mod team in the past? I don't see why it would bother them if you're honest about it. Unless you're the ex-mod who recently did a post reveal in a cow thread without permission and exposed her ip. In that case, I don't want you on the mod team again, sorry anon
No. 61148
The infighting and derailment in the News Stories that Fuck with You thread is still ongoing.
>>>/ot/1664124Still tinfoiling about moderation
>>>/ot/1664126Derailing and tinfoil about a poster's identity
>>>/ot/1664159A two paragraph off topic anti-tif manifesto. I don't disagree but this is not the thread for it
>>>/ot/1664171Infighting. Pic used is also weird
>>>/ot/1664175Taking bait, engaging in infighting, interacting with a suspected moid, not reporting and ignoring
>>>/ot/1664177Infighting, taking bait, accusing someone of being from kiwifarms, not reporting and ignoring
>>>/ot/1664195More off topic derailing
No. 61150
>>61147I still can't believe either of the two ip incidents, like how shitty and petty do you have to be?
Literally no one would want to post on this site if they have to live in fear that pathetically samefagging your own post because no one laughed may get your anonymity revoked, like? God damn, are you heartless? Lmfao, she wasn't in-fighting, she basically went "please clap," should have just let her live with herself lol
I have to admit, I'm not as familiar with the other event, but it doesn't matter; you just don't do ip reveals
No. 61151
>>61142>>61140so rita is obsessed with the lolcow and comes here to bait for attention. users should report and move on and bait posts should get red-texts more often that actually say
(bait) (I know there's a limit to that that could cripple discussion but some posts are so obviously inflammatory and looking for infights that it's getting tired at this point). I don't think mods should reveal her post history again because she would get off on seeing her nickname but they should slap a
(poster 123 banned for repeated baiting) label or something on it for posterity.
so annoying to have repeat visits from this butthurt troll.
No. 61158
>>61152Nta, that isn't
usually how it happens, but from I recall, that is how it happened once.
>>61153A key detail people are forgetting is that this was not done by admins nor admin approved. That's why the janny who ip revealed got kicked from the team.
>you must be a salty shitposterAgain nta, but expecting mods to not be jackasses doesn't mean she's done something wrong. Everybody already agrees the instances we are talking about were inappropriate. Stop using every opportunity possible to shit on other people.
No. 61160
>>61152That's literally
exactly what happened to catshit-chan
>>61153Yes, by an admin after investigation, not a power-tripping janny just cuz she feels like it
>>61158I guess they want nitpicky-ass jannies looking for bullshit reasons to drop the ban hammer and write a cute little redtext; I spent most of my time sitting on top of gore spammers deleting the shit so fast, most people never had to see it while I was online
I didn't say SAMEFAGGING IS COOL AND I THINK WE SHOULD DO IT, I said it was faggy and lame that whoever busted catshit-chan did that. Because it was. The way it happened indicates that a janny had literally been sitting in that thread checking IPs
waiting for someone to samefag, and then she felt the need to show everyone her janny card, like? You power tripping their, chief? Weird behavior, there's almost always more to do on lolcow
No. 61162
>>61153The rules do say that, but that doesn't mean we have to agree with the actions of the staff. I think we all know that IP and post history reveals should be saved for actual extreme cases, not for petty things.
Assuming this is about the cat piss incident, even the current admins themselves said they didn't agree with it so idk why it's still a topic. Shaymin was fine with it though, which was weird because she publicly shamed a janny for revealing someone's post history.
No. 61171
>>61169>>61166>>61167>>61170It's post
>>1664153In the things you hate thread on ot
No. 61178
File: 1692037756156.jpg (467.4 KB, 1080x1084, RitaAdmits.jpg)
Remember how we had anons complaining about terfs and reporting transphobic stuff? Recently rita and a few of her likeminded female friends made posts on lgbt admitting to using vpns to both make those posts and spam report any post they disagreed with until a janny bans the other anon they were arguing with.
No. 61181
>>61179Wtf are you talking about? This isn't related to the staff tinfoil you were talking about, this tranny disaster happened like 15 days ago and I was just baffled with the amount of
terf-haters we randomly had that day, this post explains it.
I also don't hang there, I saw some anon mention rita started posting again and I just searched up lolcow on the archieves to find them admitting to their antics.
No. 61187
>>61178Yikes, ot, but I feel kind of bad for retards like this. How low does your iq need to be for you to waste all your time on crap like this. And think it's fun, to boot. She needs a caretaker to turn the modem off and wheel her outside so she can get some fresh air and sunlight.
>every time they get mad about trannies and say they should die i report for aloggingI can't imagine bragging about fake encounters on an imageboard. Cringe infinito
>>61160If that's true and you were anon who used to be on the old team, I hope you reapply. New mod team is a little wack.
>>61169Okay, show us the bad bans and nitpicking you are talking about. You say it happens but there are no linked posts or screenshots.
I have said before that there are jannys' pets running around but that is because whoever is in charge of /ot/ right now is either taking sides in infights, or is simply shit at banning both sides of an infight (with the exception of whoever was handing out bans a couple of days ago when admins also stepped in). But it sounds like you are complaining about something else.
>>61182Read her post a little more carefully. She is saying the anon
you replied to is probably trying to spook people by bringing up that the site says they can reveal your IP. She was explaining what she thinks that anon's motives are.
No. 61192
File: 1692047089063.png (639.16 KB, 1080x1190, trannybaiter.png)
>>61191Samefag, the tranny here was threatening Retard in the same thread. If that even is her. There was also a spam raid on her thread two weeks ago. So this faggot is definitely a male
No. 61195
File: 1692049905844.jpg (206.86 KB, 929x600, scrotescrote.jpg)
>>61194I'm not rita, tranny. This you, sexually harassing a lesbian on a board none of her leaked posts were in?
No. 61206
File: 1692078827573.png (37.67 KB, 1925x325, twirls moustache.png)
Admin for the love of god check your runaway janny fighting people in the fandom psychology thread in /ot/. The post in picrel was pretty damn obviously being ironic and making fun of a sperg calling women into fandom erotica "just as bad" as coombrained scrotes and unironically saying fujos "rape characters", who the fuck hands out a ban for this? In /ot/? The janny has been dropping her trip and going bananas redtexting people who call her out for it yet the sperg in question infighting and derailing the thread for hours and hours gets to go at it. If it's not a staff member then I apologize, but it's just not looking good in general to allow a person to bait, infight and derail for hours attacking and insulting other anons but redtexting and banning others for spelling it out in the thread.(ban evading newfag continues to ban evade)
No. 61209
File: 1692083777857.png (96.98 KB, 1951x700, redtext.PNG)
>>61206Just to top this off the irony in this is palpable. I don't even know how you can get banned for telling people to be vigilant of people intentionally derailing but the post below it makes the redtext even more pathetic. Btw the anon still carrying on the infight was still allowed to do so.
No. 61211
File: 1692088393340.png (379.25 KB, 1192x852, newfags.png)
>>61206>>61209>newfag gets banned for continuing to infight/derail thrad>posts proof of their own ban evasion>claims mod is poster they're fighting with because they were banned for derail/infight>goes to cry on meta about being banned>others (possibly same evader) continues to derail infight about being banned and it being a conspiracy>"Why am I/they continuing to be banned for reeing about being banned!"Newfags get banned for a reason. Based farmhands herding newfags.
No. 61215
>>61199>>61213They allow the antifujo thread to stay up despite anons posting there being notorious for intentionally hatestalking the fujo thread to bait and then minutes after run back into their containment zone hooting and hollering about fujos being pedophilic woman hating trannies ruining their fictional husbandos. It's a thread entirely based on infighting yet jannies look the other way while locking down a "husbandofag cringe" thread immediately as if the antifujo thread didn't attract shotafag debate all the time. It's clear that they have an agenda and they should really just be honest about wanting fujos off the site for their personal reasons instead of being so immature and conniving about it. People constantly start inflammatory infights calling fujos this and that with their degree in Tumblr psychology and turn into rabid dogs frothing at the mouth when people disagree crying "twitterfag" because being insufferable is the only way they know how to debate, yet like seen in
>>61209 they NEVER get banned and are allowed to samefag and attack anons for hours despite sounding scrotey as fuck at times (in the sense of "fujos are ugly fat bitches who can't get laid"). Fujos live inside their heads indefinitely and you don't even have to be one for them to start accusing you of being such, they even cannibalize husbandofags for disagreeing. None of those bans are mine so you can stop with the "you got banned and had your feelings hurt" cope.
No. 61228
>>61215>anons posting there being notoriousthere's just one anon who does stalks the fujo general and fujochan, and we all know who she is (the hand poster, proably Pakichan) and usually her screencaps are ignored if they're not actually funny. We know she's obsessed. But she's the only one who posts like that, the others post more relevant stuff. You're just butthurt that anons talk about their bad experiences with fujos, we've all had those because fujos are so common and we all knew cringy fujos when we were young.
Also you can't really prove that this one obsessed anti-fujo is the one making the retarded posts in your guys' thread. Maybe you do have actual retards saying stupid shit completely unironically.
>>61207NTA but there was a shotafag avatarfagging with her shota character pics and generally being an annoying attention whore that was clogging up the thread. That thread went to shit pretty quickly. I also read the older locked thread and that one seemed unnecessary, given that most of the anons reacting to the yumes posted in there were calling them endearing and funny rather than cringe kek. The contents of those two threads and the fujo thread are very different.
No. 61231
>>61229When did that happen, I wasn't aware of it.
Were the antifujos in the first fujo cringe thread actually soyjak moids, too?
No. 61235
>>61228This is being willfully ignorant. I don't even use the fujo thread in /m/ but someone always posts bait or starts attacking the posters, and when they respond it is conveniently posted in the fujocringe thread. The same with both relevant threads in /ot/; every time fujos are brought up, they get shit on and their replies are posted into the fujocringe thread with anons mocking them while intentionally misrepresenting what they're talking about.
You're annoying for fujobaiting, you're annoying for shitting up threads, and you're annoying for pretending like it's a "normal" part of lc.
No. 61247
>>61235>This is being willfully ignorant.Well I wouldn't know all about normal fujo posting habits because I usually ignore the fujo thread. But on the rare occasion I see the thread on the index, sometimes I've seen really dumb takes.
>You're annoying for fujobaitingDon't tell me you think everyone who uses the fujo cringe thread is that one obsessed poster kek
>you're annoying for pretending like it's a "normal" part of lcI never claimed baiting to get retarded fujo responses is normal. And by the way there have been multiple posts by actual fujos saying retarded shit. I'm not trying to pretend like there aren't one or a couple of really obsessed fujo haters on the site, so why don't you admit there are a couple of really dumb fujos as well? I don't even think all fujos on the site are like them.
>>61240>"fujos are pedocoomers who hate women and love trannies because I said so and this one fujo was really mean and cringe when we were 15"No one has said this in those threads. Again you're assuming everyone there is the same poster. Why don't you just accept that some people just want to talk about cringy fujos? It's not an attack against you, really.
>even when nobody grabs the bait they start aggressively replying to themselves trying to get a rise out of people yet for some reason never catch a banOr maybe you're wrong and those are actually multiple people and that's why they never get banned, which would be the simplest and most likely explanation. I mean you guys literally think there's a mod conspiracy against you. I'd say you're a little paranoid.
No. 61258
File: 1692135702215.jpg (77.28 KB, 982x430, Hicowban.jpg)
Does this really count as a "hi cow" situation? I've seen people say the same to kirbynon and ritard and they never got banned. I was on /ot/, there's not even any cows here. Banned from all boards for 6 hours kind of seems like a lot.
Can't even find my own post to see if the person who called her paki-chan got redtexted as well.
No. 61269
File: 1692162121192.png (85.35 KB, 1251x365, Screenshot_20230816_005812.png)
farmhands need to stop posting redtext like this. this post obviously should be properly saged but farmhands shouldn't inject personality into redtext, or anything really, it's cringe and embarrassing. there needs to be some kind of code of conduct or rules for farmhand/janny/mod behavior to stop this behavior.
>inb4 they do it for free!!
yes and that means they chose to do this . they should make an effort since they are taking up a spot from someone who would do a better job.(no fun allowed)
No. 61295
>>61294uh
I didn't know we had to sage in /meta/
No. 61309
>>61306They have addressed this before already basically what
>>61307 said. I’m too lazy to link the post lol. Announcing you’re a male using this site gets you banned because it was fucking annoying (if you look at really old threads, men ALWAYS announced themselves because they think it adds to the conversation somehow.) tifs are allowed. Lolcow has become female user encouraged for lack of a better term and imo it’s better that way. Trans identified males are still males and shouldn’t be encouraged to post. They have plenty of places online to already
No. 61337
File: 1692383441831.png (135.97 KB, 2794x450, 6f9ef376-86b0-4ea9-ab4d-8fe437…)
Lolcowsisters…how we come back from this? Are the moids right about us?(nice try)
No. 61434
>>61418I also wish she was banned for doing that
>>61426I wish you were banned for doing that, but if it was someone testing their ban status, wouldn't they delete the post afterwards? My theory is newfags clicking the wrong part of a post and then posting their own blank posts. But I think newfags are more likely to reply to posts without quoting, so what gives.
No. 61436
File: 1692563962261.jpg (43.71 KB, 720x720, please end the madness.jpg)
Admin, I am once again begging you to lock the shay threads and wrangle them onto the containment board.
No. 61448
File: 1692603805047.jpeg (182.04 KB, 940x424, IMG_1211.jpeg)
Can we permaban this smelly jobless retard from the tradthot thread?
No. 61497
>>61449The tranny that wanted the thread shut has been spamming the thread to try and close it. He always mentions the same thing every time and mentioned in his previous bait that all tradthot thread posters are lonely cat lady fujo neets
>>>/snow/1861707 and then started his recent larp trying to pretend he is that
>>>/snow/1884560 himself and then started reeing about the jews and AI like he did last time.
No. 61508
File: 1692714130093.jpg (140.78 KB, 965x1259, 31226889945.jpg)
>mods
>mods
>mods
>mods
>jannies
>jannies
>mods
>rockers
>mods
>jannies
>jannies
>jannies
>mods
In my day we called 'em farmhands and we was proud to do it see
No. 61533
>>61532how come it's the supposed
terf containment board where troons run amok and terfs get banned
No. 61535
>>61533Idk. Some anon posted a
terf-esque picture in the radfems captions thread and like the TIFs ate her so hard and argued that even though fanfiction readers are %97 women, the tifs arent women even though their behavior online is so typical to women.
Also some anon in blackpill (who also admitted to feeling dysphoria) called a lesbian "gender critical bitch" and argued that gender critical stuff harms women. She called the lesbian anon so many weird stuff and even told her lesbianism isn't natural because women's nature is to get fucked ans give birth. I hate tifs so much.
No. 61544
File: 1692795083707.jpg (464.96 KB, 884x1590, Transidentifyingfemale.jpg)
I've been reporting this trans individual for at least two days but farmhand finally banned it after several anons accused 2X-janny of bring trans. I don't think janny is trans but I believe they either forget to check 2X reports or allow some anons to sperg there for some reason.
No. 61545
>>61542The ones shitting up 2X discovered the board when it was public. 2X used to have quality posts but there are 2-3 trans identifying/trad female anons who keep derailing any thread whenever there's an interesting discussion.
I wish it'd be public again but we'd need active moderation for that to be possible, even now the few mentally ill trans identified females(including rita) and a few trans identifying males(blaine) bait there regularly.
No. 61551
>>61548>>61550Which thread
>>61547I think they forget 2X exists and that's why.
No. 61566
Regarding recent complaints about moderation, we acknowledge that there have been some mistakes, and also that actioning reports has been slower than we would like. The reason for this is primarily that we are understaffed. We get multiple hundreds of reports per day, and while some reports are quick and obvious (e.g. unsaged, spam), others take some time to investigate and get the context. At the moment several members of staff are on holiday, which means each of us have to deal with more reports than normal in the free time that we have. As a result, the quality of moderation has suffered and we apologise for that. We will correct any mistakes that are brought to our attention and we appreciate those of you who take the time to call them out here.
>>61273This is correct, no current farmhand is “taking a spot” from a potential applicant. We reached out to every promising farmhand application, less than half of the applications of them responded at all (and we tried every contact method they provided). If you’re reading this and you have applied to be a farmhand and did not hear back, submit again and make sure that your contact details are definitely ones that we can reach you with.
>>61534Almost all bans are redtexted, but there is only one redtext per ban. If a user makes several rule breaking posts in one session, they get one longer ban. The post that is actually used to create the ban is the one that gets the redtext. If you see a bunch of rulebreaking posts as part of a large infight or derail and only a few have a redtext, the most likely scenario is that there was only a handful of users participating. This is how it has always worked. If the above situation doesn’t seem to apply, then we may not be aware of the post because it hasn’t been reported yet, so please submit a report.
>>61345The vast majority of bans are done based on the reports that we receive. Farmhands are not randomly going into threads and banning people (we can see a history of their actions and whether or not it was based on reports). They have made mistakes (such as mismatched redtext or incorrect bans) by acting on shitty reports without double checking the context, which is a side effect of the understaffing problem mentioned above. It's still obviously not ideal and we want to stop it from happening, and we’re doing what we can to enable that (such as developing better mod tools to make it easier to deal with reports with the staff that we have).
>>61514>>61516If a post is not reported it is unlikely that it will be banned. If you see a post that deserves a ban and doesn't have one, please report it. Please be as descriptive as possible in the report reasoning, this helps the farmhands a lot when issuing bans.
>>61532>>61533We are aware the moderation on /2X/ has been subpar lately. One of our long-time farmhands has volunteered to take a more active role in staying on top of threads in /2X/, so hopefully you'll notice an improvement.
>>60820To be clear, there is no way the Dakota thread will be closed. The threads for important/historic cows will only ever be locked if the cow dies.
>>61427The tradthot thread has been closed for now. There were only a handful of posters in there who aren't the tranny, and those users were also constantly samefagging, derailing, infighting etc. We'll consider reopening it on a trial basis after it has cooled off.
>>61445>>61460We've updated the report box to allow more text, thank you for the suggestion! Due to the way pages cache it won't update everywhere right away but you should see the change soon.
No. 61569
>>61566A lot of the complaints about moderation have nothing to do with staff numbers. And being understaffed doesn't explain why the moderation is subpar.
I don't know what to think anymore. On the one hand, anons complain they step up to become farmies and get no response. On the other, you're saying lots of applications but somehow they all fuck up their contacts or just don't bother.
No. 61579
So I was recently red texted for this post
>>>/ot/1674762 but I can still post, so was this intentional or just an error that's happening cause of the Chinese Internet service I use?
No. 61593
File: 1692899367003.jpg (99.19 KB, 926x279, Misogyny .jpg)
>>61592Like why the fuck is this anon, who's most likely a man or a trans person, allowed to talk to every anon like this but never gets a redtext when you guys ban for much less severe offenses of infighting? Is this a mod in your team?
Why don't you device ban this person? Didn't they get perma-banned numerous times already?
No. 61595
>>61593we perma ban them, they just ban evade. Please report them so we can continue to ban them.
>>61592Please just report them. We get on them every time we see time but we're understaffed at the moment so actioning on reports is a bit slower than normal. Give us some time as some farmhands come back from vacations soon.
>>61577the admins/cerbmin weren't even here or have full access to things at that point. You were probably talking to the previous admin. I suggest reapplying.
No. 61598
>>61597I know it's not a moid(although there are male baiters in 2X), it's a wanna be fakeboy who even admitted to her dysphoria and the aspiration to be a male on the same thread several times. Why did the other anon get a device ban if it's impossible though?
Just shut down the thread. Why are you allowing someone to post hundreds of posts about oral sex and her hatred of women? What does her thread contribute to the board as a whole? You guys banned the anti husbando thread because two anons baited there but you won't ban the blackpill thread although its obviously only used by avid ban evaders.
No. 61603
File: 1692904920871.jpg (136.93 KB, 981x603, areyoufuckingserious.jpg)
I know admins just posted a message about moderation quality, but this is ridiculous. I was in the Dumbass Shit thread, I was discussing aggressive newfags running rampant on /ot/ so I was on-topic, and I get banned and told to take it to /meta/? With the excuse that I was "tinfoiling" when I was joking about something anons say in /meta/ threads?
Farmhands who don't even look up context before banning don't belong on the moderation team. Admins need to come up with some sort of junior mod system, because this is a joke. At this point, I believe the other anons who have been saying an /ot/ janny hands out bans if anyone talks about her shit work, or disagrees with her stupid posts.
No. 61604
>>61602No1currs, stop posting incel-tier takes here and ban evading. There are at least 3 ban evading anons there who spend hours posting there, consider going outside sometimes for your ban durations instead maybe.
>>61603I don't think there are enough anons who apply so admin has to do with the bad mods until someone new comes along.
No. 61606
>>61602Are you one of those trendy gendies who thinks you don't need to have dysphoria to be trans?
What is your purpose, to be so irredeemably low that you need to think of every other woman as beneath you to soothe your rotten ego? Insufferable. Take your hangups and hang yourself, you're miserable and nobody wants you here.
(a-logging) No. 61608
>>61605How am I supposed to Google if lolcow can ban mac addresses? You can't call anyone newfags because they don't know if device bans are possible on sites, I've seen several anon complain about device bans here so I thought it was a enw feature.
And why are you saying anon didn't know how to bam evade when she literally posted here? She does know, she's not stupid and I don't understand why you're insulting both of us randomly.
I've been around for 5 years btw altho it's not too long, I'm not a newfag.
No. 61618
File: 1692923842858.jpg (99.91 KB, 1080x455, anotherone.jpg)
Okay, so I don't get it. I'm trying my best to report infighting or what I think is bait, because mods have been constantly saying "report and move on", "we only see things if you report them", "make sure you report it so we can see it". And now I have a 24 hour ban for "abusing reports" with no explanation. How am I supposed to know what I've been doing wrong if you don't fucking tell me. This site is a fucking joke.
No. 61620
>>61618Someone else also got a similar ban.
>>60960Also, staff have told us to spam reports before and things like "if you see a post with no ban, report it" but also "no redtext ≠ no ban". There was also that time where a farmhand said anons hadn't reported something (It was gore or something similar) but then multiple anons said they had reported it, so we don't have any way of knowing when our reports go through on our decrepit site. Idk.
No. 61630
>>61629>>61628Ignore the baiters, I doubt mods will be able to ban it given how slow they've been towards infighting reports.
>>61629Yeah post the ones that are unwarranted. As I said, I'm quite sure that SOME mods ban more towards their own biases than actual rules. I literally got banned for reporting some anons like the cocksucking fetishist yet she's allowed to ban evade for days
No. 61644
>>61627can you post them here? I am legitimately not seeing them outside of 2 that I personally handled.
We really are understaffed right now. I personally can't be here everyday but I check every 2 days. Please be patient as again, some of the farmhands are coming back soon from vacation.
No. 61646
Was
>>>/m/317483 banned because you're using tranny-jannies now? I suspect that mod is a tranny - please investigate.
No. 61648
>>61647Then why ban only that user for 'infighting' while spare everybody who replied with even worse
>incitement to infightingand derailment like this one:
>But we're all pedotrannies in this thread sis, we need to act accordingly>>>/m/317564?
No. 61655
>>61649I understand being patient, and both you and admins have mentioned farmhands coming back from vacation. But why are you guys telling people to stop reporting? I know you have a lot of reports, but I am genuinely reporting what I think is infighting or trying to incite an infight.
>>>/meta/60960>>>/meta/61618>>>/meta/61627>>>/meta/61630>>>/meta/61640The first person may have been reporting a post more than once bc the mod message says so, but they explained themselves. I also made the mistake of reporting for each rule broken for a little bit, because I thought that was how the system worked. But why are so many people getting banned for "abusing reports" right now. Not to mention my ban literally did not say anything about how I was abusing.
Again, I understand that you're understaffed, but how is mod team going to ask us to help by reporting, and then ban us for doing what you ask. You just admitted that you aren't even banning the other side of an infight because you "haven't gotten to that specific post yet". So mods don't even investigate the thread where a post was reported most of the time?
No. 61657
>>61655Users have been spamming the same post multiple times with multiple report reasons. If it's gore or cp, that's understandable. But trying to make it seem like you're different people reporting a singular post is abusing reports. I've seen instances where a user will report the same post about 5 different times, all with a different reason just so that it can seem like there are multiple users reporting it. We can see who reports what.
If you have reported a post ONCE we will see it. You don't need to report it 3 or 4 times for us to pay attention to it.
Additionally, reporting posts that don't break the rules also counts as abusing reports. Reporting an anon for simply disagreeing with you counts as abusing reports. Reporting users for doing something you don't like is also considered abusing reports.
We have seen a major increase in all of those things lately.
No. 61658
>>61657Thank you, literally what I tried to explain
>>61624 but apparently I'm hostile
No. 61659
>>61658to be fair, you did sound a bit like Nancy Grace in that last question,
nonny kek
No. 61664
>>61644How is it that you are understaffed yet Cerbmin made a post a couple of months ago announcing that you “only” had 20 applications? I’ve also seen multiple anons mention their applications being rejected as well and before you say they were insincere or whatever, they were very clearly long time users confused about why they were being rejected.
Why is it that you allow malicious rumors, bullying and obsessive baiting of other female ib admins as well, such as CC and CCC? Both were ddosd, harassed and threatened and each time they were, lo and behold someone was bumping hate threads for them here with the most insane ramblings and outright lies?
The CCC case being the most egregious one and I suspect they were intimidated behind the scenes to change the story at the last minute from a ddos to an issue with lynxchan.
You are incredibly lucky that they disappeared and aren’t able to be contacted because one look at their data would probably blow your cover. Is that why you’re still going so hard on them?
This stuff is honestly beyond belief and in all the years lolcow has been running it has never been this bad. Your users are very obviously being spoofed and you gaslight them about it at every opportunity and try to discredit anyone who wants people to be cautious on here. You’re legitimately criminals at this point and I am saddened by the wilful ignorance of a lot of the people still posting on here. Please believe people when they say this admin team has no good intentions for you or anyone else but if you don’t, don’t be surprised if you’re suddenly mysteriously blocked from a bunch of websites you frequent for sending too many requests. Fucking sad what has been happening and downright scary
No. 61667
>>61665I’m sorry? I don’t know what in my post is somehow secret knowledge only a former staff member would know… everything I know that I have mentioned I have gathered from reading the many threads made about this, where you are a constant presence. You seem to think yourself very intelligent but please believe me when I say that you are so painfully obvious to anyone who isn’t gullible and naive it’s actually a bit funny. I don’t know who you are, or who you think I am, I’m sure you have your ideas as anyone with your mental deficiencies has likely made many an enemy but I don’t know you, seriously. I’ve followed this drama after a post made on here by a user suggesting she might have been spoofed and you (obviously, as you are always incredibly aggressive and manic) were doing your best to make her feel insane.
The CCC issue was insane to watch unfold and I’ve tried to contact them to no avail same with Snail so again, your luck. But yes I don’t know what mask to take off or what horrible crimes you think I have committed against you that would even begin to justify your criminal activity. Very telling that this is your only response to this by the way, at least you are finally beginning to take your mask off.
No. 61676
File: 1693021634677.jpg (30.65 KB, 1164x97, 6784379854.jpg)
>>61664>Why is it that you allow malicious rumors, bullying and obsessive baiting of other female ib admins as well, such as CC and CCCStop pretending to have any contact with cc staff or snail. You're making shit up and I'm willing to bet you are one of the choachan failmins' buddies in their discord because you regurgitate same bullshit everytime.
>The CCC case being the most egregious one and I suspect they were intimidated behind the scenes to change the story at the last minute from a ddos to an issue with lynxchan. It was definitely choachan staff who were accusing the admin of the new board to be someone from here or spoons/slug. Then a former ccc janny confirms they were mods. ccc staff emailed the new hk admin accusing her of being multiple people to the point where she had to tell them to stop contacting her. But I know none of you will address that.
Pic rel, one of the ccc admins admitting to spamming cc in the past, when their other admin complained about being banned last year for breaking the rules and having her posts deleted. Any anon can see that ccc users have spammed lc and cc at any opportunity they get. Why do you think the mods restricted their bunker thread?
>>61669Cerbmin backtracing all of our IPs right now oh noes.
>>61668Please take your medication, go to therapy, whatever it is you need to do to get mentally stable. You can always logoff and delete system32.
Reposting because I found this post from when cerbmin made their introductions. Very informative to see our residents schizos are still at it.
>>>/meta/52228 No. 61686
>>61685Unlike you I’m not illiterate
>I don’t believe anything coming from CCC staffIs that staff in the room with us right now? How weird that a random miner would pop up right now, who is up to date on the drama to such a detailed degree and is also upset at an imageboard for Korean boygroups!
>no proof of a ddos>okay so maybe it was a ddosI know this site isn’t really used by anyone but you and 5 lost souls at this point and nobody is really reading this, I’m just laying out to you how obvious and stupid you are, which I know hurts you more than anything. I know all your secrets and you have no idea who I am, hope that eats at you
No. 61694
>>61688I saw rancefag post on R9K about hating brown and black men. I'm %99 sure she's one of the constant racebaiters but since she uses a vpn each time, she never gets detected.
Aside from her, pakichan and indiachan are two brown women who constantly attack muslims AND white women, muslims because they blame all their issues on their brownness, white women because they're jealous of them. Indiachan said some women deserved to be raped and pakichan has attacked white women several times, even saying they shouldn't have rights to abortion.
No. 61697
>>61695Can you really blame them? If the men from their own countries are so trash (and they are this way because of drinking Islam kool-aid since toddlerdom), they latch onto idealised portrayals of men, preferably 'foreign' and 'exotic'. If you're gonna chastise them for it, you should do the same to the crazy non-Korean fangirls of Korean boybands, for the sake of equality of treatment.
It perhaps also makes them feel good to post in a way that makes moids from their own countries/cultures seethe at being 'cucked'. Why are you so bent on controlling the ways other people use to vent?
(racebaiting) No. 61703
>>61697Yeah I can. Indiachan said women deserved to be raped to death if they had sons, even if unintentionally. Pakichan said white women don't deserve any rights, especially to abortion. Does their beliefs seem similar to their men? Because to me it does. I'm not fully white either but whenever these nonwhite racebaiters start sperging, it annoys she shit out of me. They should stfu and stop parroting their mans beliefs about how rape is deserved and women shouldn't have rights.
Also stop comparing two women who say women deserve rape and women don't deserve rights to dumb teenager who are fans of boybands. These women knowingly target other women and keep making ragebait posts putting down other women. Didn't you forget how pakichan pretended to be a black anon for almost two years so she could mock black women, call them aggressive, crappy, etc?? They're both mentally ill racists with inferiority complexes and they're not any different from the men they pretend to hate.
No. 61711
>>61706Quality is bad because no one good is applying i think. Even if mods abuse powers/don't view enough reports, since there are no alternative mods-to be (who have more time and less biases) they don't lose their positions.
If you wanna make a change, applying for the position could work. We'd find good use in mods that care more.
No. 61714
>>61708Nta but not really tinfoil. Pakichan admitted to:
>Saying she wants to marry varg(neonazi) and be his slave>getting outed by a mod when she was larping as a half black girl and posting as (c)rap-chan.>calling black people subhumans while pretending to post as (c)rap-chan>speaking against women's abortion rights>saying she hates white feministsIndia-chan did:
>Say "some" women deserve to be raped>Said women who give birth to sons or marry men deserve to be rapedThese aren't tinfoils, most rapid racebaiters are either mentally ill retards or self-hating racist misogynistic nonwhite anons who want white men but hate white women (india-chan, sealchan and paki-chan, probably more but they're not namefags so we don't know em).
You probably don't use ot or started coming here this year, otherwise you'd have witnessed one of pakichans racebait spergouts. Next thing you'll tell me romanianon doesn't exist, kek.
No. 61715
Bringing back this pakichan classic:
https://i.imgur.com/Vy5Vx3d.jpgNot posting photo because of the glitch.
No. 61739
File: 1693074210133.jpg (120.74 KB, 1024x915, gettyimages-glz053-1024x1024.j…)
anons when they get banned for being a retard, then running to meta to complain about being banned for being a retard
No. 61747
>>61725Who is LB and why should we care?
>>61692I'm trembling in my boots anon, you sure spooked me
No. 61756
File: 1693086060666.gif (5.12 MB, 498x300, alexjones-alex.gif)
>>61754Fresh new tinfoil straight off the rack
No. 61776
>>61765Please tell me
>>61764Idk who's posting it, I'll make fum of fags or hags that waste their time to impress null
No. 61784
>>61783Hey spookybones why are you ignoring me? Why can’t you code? Are you hitting the bottle again? Is it because you’re sad you lost yammy tammy the most elusive stalker
victim you’ve had so far? You really liked her huh ):
No. 61795
>>61794can i ask why you bring up maxxine?
i remember when this happened, but i do not understand what this has to do with anything?
i have been lurking and am confused at what is going on…
No. 61803
>>61795Maxxine was swiftly removed once a regular user caught wind of him being both a tranny and 14. I mention this because why the fuck did a discord server with voice verification let a 14 year old boy be its main mod? Maybe because the admin is a groomer Troon? One ponders
>>61797Sucks for you but yam isn’t all that ashamed of herself as you like to make it out to be and she has told us extensively about Lyn, who was castrated at what? 6? And tricked her into thinking he was a woman after non consensually masturbating after randomly drunk calling her on discord. Is that the sexual relationship you mean? She told you immediately afterwards that he’s a tranny, I call that sexual assault but of course you would use a woman’s sexual assault against her as an own because you are what? A disgusting pedo troon. Bingo!
No. 61806
>>61788you're either stupid or new, and neither are reasons for me to give you a
valid response honestly
No. 61810
File: 1693095947636.jpeg (645.53 KB, 828x1322, IMG_0215.jpeg)
>>61808Just give it up you fucking vile loser. She got your ass and we all know it because this is the best response you have and you’re also quietly seethe permabanning me like the coward rat that you are. You’re going to jail and you’ll be on reduxx. Smile!
No. 61811
>>61809He has been reported but the feds are pussyfooting and in the meantime he’s still being a bitchass predator by using this site as his honeypot. By he I mean you, because nobody but him would twist the truth being revealed as something negative, it’s hindering him from getting more
victims through this site (you)
No. 61814
>>61813Broken record strike uhhh fuck 303847294784
Your desperation reeks to all the way over here, hope you’re scared bitch boy
No. 61823
>>61794if spookybones owned lolcow and used it as a honeypot then why did he try to bring farmers to his shit ass burn book forum? was it a decoy honeypot to distract from the real one? all i'm gathering from this is that an ex farmhand (proof?) failed at running an offshoot of an offshoot imageboard until it closed and subsequently got owned by some honeypot copycat offshoot of an offshoot of an offshoot version of her site and for some reason is extremely heated about a new kpop board being made? the biggest lolcow admin related scandal here is that this kind of retard was ever on the team in the first place if any of this is true
>>61804>I’m telling the truth by bringing up the fucking tranny who earraped his janny who was the only one ever deleting any CP and gore on this piss site with the CCC admin. Cute huh?you legitimately aren't doing yourself any favors spewing this incoherent crap. is this a gayop against yammy because I can't imagine how you could think this is in any way making anyone related look sane and reasonable.
>>61812why are we personal armying for the woman who egged on chris chan raping his mom? what am i missing here?
>>61811>>61820one ounce of proof. i'm begging at this point. if anyone is covering up sexual assault (how do you get sexually assaulted over discord anyway?) why aren't you laying it out coherently instead of acting like this. you're not serious at all
>inb4 hi spookybones kill yourself tranny janny rope you spoofed my router to death and now my IP has aids [insert more moid style aggression frothing at the mouth] No. 61825
>>61823You’re deliberately misreading and misrepresenting things and straight up misquoting even! Tsk tsk. You’ll cling to this until your dying breath I guess. You know yammy is nobody right? You can talk as much shit as you want there’s no reputation to ruin or to discredit, it’s a random name to a faceless person, you trying to whitewash the literal two year obsession we all saw first hand on here does
you no favors. You can’t even string a coherent sentence together without at least 12 typos, either because you’re very upset or not sober lbr, yet you are so hellbent on trying to act like this was all completely difficult to understand and nonsense despite it being better written than anything your broken mind could spew out. Bella janke was an edgy 20smth who was hacked and massively harassed by spookybones and Michael Thurlow. Chris-chan didn’t even rape his damn mom, that’s how insidious and far reaching y- I mean his misinformation campaign is. It’s really just arguing with a brick wall at this point because you are an expert at twisting everything to make it sound ludicrous, real npd stuff. It’s exhausting and annoying. We can all read for ourselves and see that the things said are not the way you repeat them. You’ve done this for months already with both cc and ccc. I suppose it’s futile to tell you again that you are stupidly obvious and the only reason anyone drops shit with you is because you are so fucking irritating with this. Like a toddler who just refuses to understand. Your mental disease will never ever let you admit that you have lost, so enjoy twisting all of this into the most ridiculous pretzel you can conjure up, try to get a proofreader though because you sound legitimately disabled at times
No. 61827
>>61826Posts like these are a really bad look for you. I’d avoid telling you so as to not give you tips but I think you’re too far gone to care right now. Idk what your beef with Rita is either or where she even came from lol. She seems to know that you guys are unhinged stalkers of the criminal variety too though from what I have gathered so I guess that’s why she bothers you.
Also lolcow used to be 90% walls of text at some point, miss that time. Think our totally real bioqueen admin was absent during those peaceful months
No. 61849
>>61848I think smoking
more weed would help us all vibe out.
No. 61864
File: 1693108917966.png (281.82 KB, 540x494, tumblr_ba3cecec3f7908f1e12dd4a…)
>>61863Lmfao.. what the fuck
No. 61869
File: 1693113254636.png (207.26 KB, 944x332, IJPxq6r.png)
>>61839That was just Dawn spamming crystalcafe
No. 61870
File: 1693114600646.jpg (29.09 KB, 736x414, 75b1e8c1d46ccddfc73fbc06073743…)
>>61869so that's not yammys best friend and co-admin admitting that yammy spammed crystal cafe on her public admin discord she linked on 3c?
>>61676 No. 61875
File: 1693124503576.png (23.97 KB, 1496x227, c.PNG)
Presented without comment.
No. 61904
File: 1693149681921.png (145.76 KB, 400x288, 7b76.png)
No. 61952
>>61949You've just gotta be here to spread wrong information purposely. Why on earth would they require you to verify on lolcow for the discord? and not only that, why would anyone be okay with that and not bring it up?
>>61950 is correct
No. 61958
File: 1693191665854.jpg (179.54 KB, 1080x429, Screenshot_20230827_200336_Chr…)
>>61957There's over 37mil sites that do. It's not a big deal or anything anons need to be worried or concerned about. Your IPs are visible to mods/admin and you're freaking out about analytics that don't track anything important.
No. 61961
>>61958The schizo that was banned yesterday went on to continue her posting over at cc
https://crystal.cafe/b/res/246328.html#250662my biggest question is that if anon says she's seen the creepy backend then why would the cc bunker thread throw them over the edge ?
No. 61963
File: 1693192643363.jpg (173.54 KB, 1080x1234, Screenshot_20230827_223520_Bra…)
No. 61964
>>61958You're right but it's still gross to allow this many bots on to the site. I noticed my browser blocks a high amount of shit from CC as well as LC (on certain old pages) but this is still higher than most chans.
I'm just curious. How come it's this way? Is it because most of us are phonefags? Or because threads stay around for years so they accumulate more bots as more people visit?
Why even use google analytics in the first place?
No. 61971
File: 1693202455517.jpg (1.12 MB, 3264x2448, MTXX_PT20230828_000227495.jpg)
No. 61973
File: 1693202862007.jpg (180.72 KB, 630x1077, trackers.jpg)
>>61968I think you're full of shit.
No. 61975
File: 1693203212810.jpg (62.47 KB, 559x215, umatrix.jpg)
>>61973And here's umatrix from a firefox based browser.
>>61974Or someone that doesn't understand how the internet works.
No. 61976
>>61970I don't know how this works obviously, and I'm not the other zuroRAT anon from yesterday, I'm just trying to understand why LC has an insane amount of tracking scripts compared to other chans.
Because this
>>61968 isn't normal for an imageboard.
Is this data used to track users (maybe lolcows?) to other sites? Or to generate money? And if it's for search engine optimizations, why does there need to be so many?
>>61973>>61974Turn on blocking scripts. I had the same thing shown above when using 4chan and LC with this option. And images and banners still show for me. It would be nice to get an answer for why this is the case.
No. 61977
>>60988>>61974It's not a scrote it's a group of vendettachans or ex mods that have been doing the same song and dance since December of last year. Last time one of the ex discord mods claimed Shaymin was a groomer alongside Elaine and Blaine. Yesterday some ban evading posters claim that spookybones was always the admin and today there's a completely new tinfoil about Google analytics. The anon said they were banned and called a man so I guess they were one of the ban evading anons. Now they say they have seen parts of the backend via webscraping. You can't access anything that isn't relayed through the webserver. There's also multiple anons affiliated through their discord antics
>>60988 spreading the same rumors because they think the admins here had something to do with their site closing and they think the hk admin is a tranny or mod they know.
No. 61989
>>61977How many times are they going to go on about the same shit? They really wait until a new thread is made on meta to redo the same repeated shit.
Anons, ignore the fake ads bullshit. Lolcow isn't tracking you. It's fake.
No. 61993
File: 1693235178460.jpg (183.41 KB, 1139x1424, IMG_20230828_163658.jpg)
>>6198
it's not fake. I can literally block scripts rn and the tracker number will shoot into the thousands. why are you and other snarky anons itt trying so hard to convince me it's not? I'm actually starting to believe the schizos kek
No. 61999
>>61986Right, it's /meta/ not a board where hapless /ot/ jannies can easily make mistakes. iirc there are mods for certain boards, not all mods have access to other boards. in other words, p sure the bans in meta are justified.
>despite the countless promises of increased transparency.I also find it kinda of weird that you are itching around for every single piece of information that you don't know about on this site, especially in the midst of this tinfoil brigade attempt. they tell us about the workings of the site, they tell us about how they are short on staff. what else do you want? an explanation for every single ban on here?
>w-why were these anons banned in meta! they said they don't ban in meta unless it's extreme that kind of answers its own question. Farmhands have been a lot more active in meta than anywhere else and an admin literally just posted here and explained why they ban in meta, so any normal person would use context clues to come to an understanding that the bans in meta are attached to users that violate things that are not always explicitly obvious. they even said they don't ban unhinged anons or tinfoiling anons, so isn't that even more of a clue as to the type of schizos they are banning? I could see if it was ot or snow where i don't expect admins to be super active on, yes that can be easily explained away by retarded or powerhungry jannies, but not /meta/ because as I stated before, it has been brought up multiple times that they don't let just any mod have access to all boards.
tbh I'm not even sure why I'm replying to you, you are likely one of them or baiting.
No. 62000
>>61993They aren't tracking you, they could always use IP to narrow it down if you aren't using a VPN. Re-read what has been said about SEO and why scripts run. It's not to track or follow the users. Even 4chan uses this in order to track how many users visit. This isn't something new for websites, certainly not for chans. Take your conspiracy crap and leave already. You've already tried this attempt at fearmongering.
>>>/meta/57087>>>/meta/57067 [suddenly its 2000 trackers. sure, anon, whatever makes you think you'll make the site sound scary, even though you're using it constantly]
>>>/meta/56485>>>/meta/56617You samefag this same thing constantly. Shut up.
No. 62001
Posted what amounts to "it's okay for a guy to jerk off in the bathroom alone", got red texted as moid.
>>>/ot/1680477 What the fuck? Are you out of your mind?
Inb4 VPN. I'll stop using VPN services when my authoritarian country stops jailing people for posts made in 2005.
(admin@lolcow.farm) No. 62008
>>62005Just saw your og banned post. You said it's ok for a man to jerk off after he gets an erection from watching his gf cry because her best friend passed away.
No wonder a Russian whore thinks that's okay, don't all of your fathers leave and husbands/bfs beat you on the daily before dumping you? Of course you think it's ok for a man to get aroused by a womans pain, your culture normalizes it
(racebaiting/autism) No. 62013
>>61999I don't care about the stupid tinfoilers, the issues with the mod team predate their little raid or whatever it is. I ignore them like a normal person and don't use it as a cop out to avoid facing legitimate criticism, as you've clearly attempted to work towards by insinuating my entirely unrelated crit must mean I am one.
If
you read 'context clues' in meta, you can see a lot of questioning around bans, even meta bans, which farmhands reply to with snarky remarks. You're telling me while they're so woefully understaffed, yet they had time to be petty but not to give a simple explanation to confused anons?
Go open up the meta catalogue, scroll to the very bottom and look how original admin-sama (red name) handled things. Even if you account for the growth of LC, you're saying three fucking admins and a handful of farmhands can't manage even one decent post/reply like those? What an absolute joke. You seem to have endless faith in anonymous authority figures despite the rapid decline in actual communication and moderation quality. No, blanket statement posts that make excuses but never actually address anything while the same problems repeat daily are not the admins actually doing their due diligence. You think you're being helpful WKing for them, but all you're really doing is enabling their negligence to aid lolcow's rapid decline. Not all of us care to live in willfull ignorance, anon. Having eyes and being willing to call out what I'm seeing doesn't make me part of the schizo tinfoil brigade.
No. 62018
File: 1693244417092.png (26.09 KB, 872x412, Banned.png)
>>62015>if you don't conform, you're not a girl!!Wow, lolcow never changes. Like clockwork.
>>>/ot/1680482>What next, you gonna call me a TIF for having an opinion of my own?By the way, I got banned FOR THREE FUCKING YEARS. This is insane.
No. 62020
File: 1693245262760.png (31.93 KB, 872x433, Banned2.png)
>>62018Another question to the esteemed modding team: do you guys even know what VPN is? Dozens of people can use the same IP over the course of a week, so you checking the posting history is not bulletproof, especially for older posts. Why are you quoting somebody else's post here?
No. 62026
>>62025Samefag, I just saw that she(?) also posted about wanting to rape her daughter and got the mod mentioning that previous post of hers in another post. This is so schizo.
She's saying it's someone else who posted that but given she defended men who jerk off to women that are mourning and crying I wouldn't be surprised if she also defended men who got off on hurting girls.
No. 62028
>>62027>girlIt just sounds like your average drunk alcoholic
abusive moid, kek. I guess mod was right for banning it.
No. 62034
>>61996That's why anon presented it through a accumulated report (available only on mobile) to make it look worse when multiple anons like me only get 2 trackers. I get 5 on cc, and 2 on 4chan. They act like Google analytics is only used for advertising and not SEO and tracking which pages generate the most attention.
>>62000I guess claiming that spookybones was multiple admins across the years wasn't convincing enough. Neither was this post from one of their discord buddies
>>60988 where japananon is said to be a farmhand or admin.
No. 62038
>>62035Go read the /ot/ 3c thread for a rundown but it's very confusing and mainly a discord slapfight. You can read what a former moderator who was softdoxed by the boardowner said here, the public version of events was that a moid had been stalking the boardowner for years and hacked all her devices and accounts. A friend of the 3c boardowner and admin then admitted to spreading tranny rumors that she knows were incorrect. This same person has been spreading similar rumors since December of last year if you go back to the cc bunker threads while lc was down.
>>60910>>60911Then on schizo Saturday someone loses their collective minds and says that admins here are behind DDoSing 3c and 2c and that the owner of the new kpop board is a tranny affiliated with them.
>>61931 >>61664
>>61667I don't know how japanon is related to this, but someone who says they are friendly with the former 3c owners said this
>There was a discord server where the choachan admins hung out in and it was for the most part friendly with occasional spats. The original owner went by “Bib” and is also “japananon” on here. Bib is extremely insane, strong case of batshit crazy and she lied a lot. People would make fun of her or call her out, specifically board owner. Bib was very manipulative back then already and would constantly message us in private to try and get us to turn against her. Eventually someone who met her irl dug up a bunch of stuff about her (such as spamming her own child pornography online) and she left the server in a huff and threatened to kill herself a bunch. She’s very vindictive and she will make up any lie to get people on her side. The discussion about shutting down choachan because of CP spam was shared in this server as well which is probably how she knows. I don’t feel bad mentioning her or what she has done as she’s been mentioned before and like I said she’s genuinely an awful person and anyone else who was in that server and doesn’t also have an axe to grind with the ccc admins can confirm thatI'm not going to derail anymore and I'll take a ban if it's warranted.
No. 62040
File: 1693251382390.png (10.3 KB, 1512x102, whaat.png)
>>62038>>62034
>Neither was this post from one of their discord buddies >>60988 where japananon is said to be a farmhand or admin.
>I suspect she’s one of the current new admins, I don’t know who the other two are or who else was involved in all of this but I’m sure anyone else who was in the ponycord can make their own guesses as board owner wasn’t afraid to tell people what she thought of them which often caused hurt feelings.The post didn't give any proof but gave a baseless accusation. They just said they suspected it, and it doesn't read like anyone who would know this tbh.
>someone who says they are friendly with the former 3c owners said this Some of this information is incorrect, I'll greentext what is:
>Eventually someone who met her irl dug up a bunch of stuff about her (such as spamming her own child pornography online) and she left the server in a huff and threatened to kill herself a bunchThis is not how her information was found, or who found it.
I don't think she's related to this, but rather a red herring, and I think whoever posted this wasn't actually in that server but heard it from someone else. As, anyone who was in there would know what happened because it happened in a channel everyone was in. Anyone who was in there would not think she had the capabilities/network of being an admin/farmhand.
Also, Rita posted about hearing this from Elaine… who no one in that server would have contact with at the time… but there are people who have been known to misinform her of things.
No. 62041
File: 1693251403128.gif (19.59 MB, 450x956, GIF_230828_151929 (1).gif)
No. 62042
File: 1693252352377.webm (572.43 KB, 480x1020, scriptblocking4chanvslc.webm)
>>62041Stop embarrassing yourself, this only happens on mobile and if you block scripts in general, not just trackers. It's most likely a script trying to turn itself on infinitely. 4chan won't even let you run the website if you do the same for example, so LC is even better in that regard because it lets you run it without JS kek.
No. 62044
>>62040Rita
debunked it and said where she heard the rumor from. There was definitely more than one anon pushing it and multiple anons have come out speaking on behalf of 3c admins pretending to be in hiding. The same 3c admins say that everything that happened to them is the fault of a former or current admin after they publicly blamed a male who got into their staff team. Make it make sense.
No. 62048
>>62044>Rita debunked it and said where she heard the rumor fromCan you show me the post?
>There was definitely more than one anon pushing itGoing through the thread I didn't see anyone pushing it, nor did I see it get much traction here.
>multiple anons have come out speaking on behalf of 3c admins pretending to be in hiding. The same 3c admins say that everything that happened to them is the fault of a former or current admin after they publicly blamed a male who got into their staff team. Make it make sense.What does that have to do with the current conversation? I just said that this post
>>60988 didn't seem to sound like anyone who was in that server.
No. 62055
File: 1693263618882.webm (6.22 MB, 624x1280, VivaCut_video_1693262656386_HD…)
>>619961. I just installed brave to check this so I had no cookies
>>620002. I used my second device which has never visited lolcow/vpns and it gave the same answer
>even 4chan uses this3. I checked 4chan with block scripts on and it doesn't fucking go up into the thousands like lolcow does
>>620424. you showed this video but you didn't load the full page
>if you block scripts in general, not just trackers5. scripts can be used to track
why are there so many gaslighters itt? I don't care about the tinfoiling or the discord dramas there's clearly suspicious people from both sides but the ones specifically from this thread seem to be lying and diverting the truth about lolcow's data mining/tracking and it's fucking weird lol I'm not whoever you are trying to pin me as
I can upload a vid of what I see too but this time I won't block javascript like the person (mod) above did to hide the number
No. 62057
>>62051In rita's post she said Elaine was the one to start the rumor that bib is a farmhand/admin. Someone else says that they think it's Elaine. It sounds like Rita heard it from Elaine?
>I'm not in any other discord servers but it sounds like the anon was in the server if you're pointing out inconsistencies in what she saidIf this person was in the discord server then they would have given the actual way she was found so no, it doesn't sound like they were in it. Considering they knew generic information about it and not specific stuff.
>but the rumors seem to originate from that server if japanon was there. There were other posts on /ot/ fixating on her and another anon here gave a similar account >>61008These are not the same servers, this was a server that someone (bib?) made after bib posted her Japan story. No one knows who that 30-40yo that harrassed/doxxed bib in this new server is. Or how they got that information. There were screenshots of this new server around here somewhere of people asking her if she was bib. These are not the same servers, as bib is not in the one
>>60988 mentioned.
Like I said, Whoever was harrassing her in the server she made.. was likely not someone in Ponycord, and probably heard it from someone in there. Not sure how that information got around tbh.
Those rumors did not originate in that server, and the first time I saw them were here.
No. 62066
>>62055For those wondering what is going on …
This tard just tried the equivalent of:
>bad-chan has been seen using vowels in their posts>I will block all posts with vowels>(6 million posts blocked)>Obviously bad-chan posted 6 million times No. 62077
>>62066this isn't coherent and doesn't even make sense. vowels..? do you think posts get blocked when you block scripts?
>6 million funny holocaust jokeyou're a tranny
>>62062>>62063>>62064>immediate snarkiness>obvious mod vendettafagging>lame twitterfag cancel culture attitudealr kek this is enough to tell me that this is shady and I should never go near lolcow with my real IP address again. I'm done
No. 62091
>>62038I can’t believe you guys seriously ever thought it was her posting on here lmao I’ve been baiting you scrotemods for ages to reveal that you are in fact scrotemods. It’s really as simple as putting your vpn to Norway and saying some random shit and they’ll go apeshit. Glad the cats out of the bag now. Track my clit you fags and trannies.
Is cjocker still pretending to be a 17 year old btw? You do know your dox is archived right? Have fun getting another call from the feds
No. 62092
>>62057These retards all blame shit on people they dislike. I saw the person who started the japanon/bib rumor and it was NOT Elaine. It was an anon from japanons server who doxxed and stalked japanon amd posted japanon past social media(which had proof of japanon beings roasted for posting underage nudes)
This person isn't elaine, she's a married woman who has beem obsessed with bib ever since the first lolcow discord server existed.
No. 62106
>>62105You really are illiterate…
It says right there in my post
>until nowSeething too hard to read properly or just a gay Mexican on Xanax?
No. 62115
>>62114nta, it is insane to me how many newfags are so unfamiliar with the internet a mere decade ago that the concept of multiple online identities doesn't even occur to them as a possibility, hell they argue against it
it's absurd; we never used to post our names or faces online, I guess the kids don't understand how easy it used to be to play a whole cast of characters online, it was not an uncommon thing to encounter for most of the internet's history
it does not attract healthy, normal people
No. 62118
>>62114You’re full of shit and probably just the nikocado asshole spamming faggot who goes by ope. Can you tell me why the HK board owner is claiming someone contacted them?
Nobody is emailing that idiot, thanks for letting us know once and for all that the place is also run by you guys. How do you even have time for anything else when all you do is sit on 3 imageboards to shit up about a woman you so deeply hate because she reported you for spamming child pornography on her website and tried to warn people about you? You must fucking stink so bad from never showering and pissing into bottles all day.
It’s very obvious whoever you’re trying to frame as this “married stalker woman” is who you suspect me of being because she was dumb enough to cozy up to you guys on org.
I’m not her so leave her the fuck alone whoever she is
No. 62127
>>62118>Can you tell me why the HK board owner is claiming someone contacted them? Because you schizos keep accusing the hk boardowner of being a moid and made legal threats against them, pretty much like what you're doing on cc and this thread right now
>>>/ot/1659494>>>/ot/1659498>>>/ot/1659503>>>/ot/1659536>>62122kek why are they defending japananon's stalker…the plot thickens
No. 62131
>>62129>Nobody has ever emailed the damn HK board owner because it was obvious from the start it was one of you guys running it with your weird “is the new board owner prettier than ccc board owner??” Shit.So you're saying that HK boardowner lied on the bunker thread and the new site? How coincidental that one of you posted a warning about faked emails recently. 'anons' come out about the 3c DDoS attacks and gore coming from admins here, but after they blamed their own users for it. They're somehow able to spoof our IPs and infect our routers with malware. The mods can view your google and youtube search history with google analytics. It's like you guys are battling Lisbeth Salander in cyberspace from the sound of things.
>It’s just you idiots samefagging up and down trying to make me look nutsYou're doing a pretty good job of it yourself.
>I guess that just tells everyone how unlikeable you are that you could only get motherfucking BIB to be your little sycophant.You seem extremely fixated on bib and defending an unnamed stalker, and I'm saying this as someone who hasn't been in any of these discord servers.
No. 62152
>>62150This is not me, I believe you wanted to reply to someone else.
>>62149OK thanks! I came here back because I already wanted to delete my post but I saw I got replies. I realized I have to change "youtu.be" to classic link format and include "watch?v=" which somehow isn't in the generated share link on mobile.
No. 62155
>>62126I'm not talking about ccc. Bib had a married woman who stalked her, that married woman also posted on crystal cafe about conspiracies of bib being in the lolcow mod team because she got banned for attacking bib here. That bait didn't get attention so now she's lying about bib being in CCC.
Namefags all accuse one another of doing made up stuff out of vendetta.
No. 62160
>>62155No fucking way, a married woman stalked her?
Married? Fucking hell
No. 62162
>>62159General Armstrong is the alleged stalker? From what I know she was a mod for the peanut gallery and I don’t remember if she was a farmhand or not… I think she was in the bunker discord server too. I know she was friends with oldmin.
This person was never in the discord server bib made and then left, but it wouldn’t surprise me if she heard it from someone else.
No. 62163
>>62161Probably because the stalker usually insults the relationships of the women she harasses and always brings up her marriage so it ended up being her description nothing more than that.
>>62159>>62162Could've been an ex farmhand or someone who lied about that. I once posted negatively about the stalker and she told me "I hope you use a vpn"
No. 62168
well I've actually been in movie night calls with her and she's shared plenty of pictures with us in discord.
>>62166This is 100% a red herring, so what are you trying to hide by bringing her up?
No. 62173
>>62172samefag,
especially when manga is male-dominated in general and she is praised for being a woman who has created an iconic manga.(aka, it's popular with people regardless of your opinion of the story.) This is a derail but that's such a weak and retarded argument.
No. 62174
File: 1693340996591.jpg (48.26 KB, 341x500, fuck off scrotes.jpg)
>>62172>author is a blatant TIM>all "female" characters are a fucking caricature of womanhood just like troonsyou people are fucking stupid. but remember my warning when the scrotes running this site start using your IP information to steal your private pictures and make AI porn of you
No. 62176
File: 1693341343480.png (38.16 KB, 1163x1090, 1680362370020.png)
>>62162>This person was never in the discord server bib made and then left, but it wouldn’t surprise me if she heard it from someone else.They're trying to deflect about it for sure. Why mention someone that wasn't in the server?
>I once posted negatively about the stalker and she told me "I hope you use a vpn"Ex-farmhand maybe, or someone who was friends with the 3c staff since they were ex farmhands themselves. The whiteknight insisting that japanon and someone named cel are also behind the DDoSing conspiracy is suspicious as hell. None of these names make sense unless you're involved in some shitcord faggotry.
>>62166Not subtle!
>>62168>This is 100% a red herring, so what are you trying to hide by bringing her up?It's not the first time someone posted this to try to pin the stalking on someone else. They're 100% trying to protect the identity of japanon's stalker because they either know her or are friends.
>>61018
>Rumor has it her husband made jschanWhat software was the new kpop board made with? jschan. They're really hurt about their own userbase moving on and continuing to post husbando in peace.
>>62158 I'm not sure if this was japanon from the thread mentions calling her the resident discord cow, but a bunch of franticly deleted replies mention the 3c boardowner. This discord drama have been going on for months and it's pathetic.
No. 62183
>>62181>sites are disappearing One imageboard that was around for 2 years shut down, it isn't that serious unless you have a mental illness.
>people have mentioned was best friends with the admin who handed this site over to Spookybones on a silver platterSo you're saying bib and this random cel person are besties with the admins here even though other anons know you're lying through your teeth.
No. 62186
>>62185None of it is hilarious. It's a little hard to care about to follow tbh. Japanon only came on my radar because she did that discord about the plain guy she flew out to fuck and talked him up I was expecting a hottie or an unconventional guy, something to look at.
Anything that's adjacent to kiwifarms, 4chan or crystal cafe is instantly boring. It's like when the penny shop makes own brand products. It's low class
No. 62188
>>62186They're throwing out random discord usernames and accusing every anon of being mods or kiwimoids embedded in some deep conspiracy, it's nutty and not helping their end goals.
>>62187What server did this happen in? The friend finder anon said that they've done this to multiple women. Another anon confirmed that this creep is deranged
>>62114 No. 62192
>>62190>Fujochan is going to be destroyed as wellThis is pretty based.
>and not the current admin either but the one before who gave it to current admin (Spookybones).Can you write a coherent sentence ESL chan? It's hard to follow along.
No. 62196
>>62195>>62193okay so why did 3c owner's confidant say she was wrong about the tranny rumors
>>>/ot/1659649 you say you know stuff from the inside but you're saying the opposite
No. 62198
>>62196>This was a mistake on my part, when I posted her site people on the thread were calling her a tranny due to her schizophrenic excel posts. It was taken for face value, the site itself wasn’t actually admin anyways from what is being said. Other people in the thread thought they were a tranny too from the site, I just rolled with it until people realized it wasn’t definitive.
I’ve actually never heard that admin speak or have seen photos of them. I don’t know if they’re actually a woman I just trusted them, which I shouldn’t have considering they are not a good person. When I asked them about spookybones in August (I think) they ignored me for months and changed the topic.
No. 62199
>>62055>>62079how am I retarded? I'm not the anons with the discord or malware conspiracies. it's true that scripts can be used to collect data on you so it's alarming to me that lolcow uses so many
I don't need to know about how every single script works to know to that 1000-2000 is excessive in comparison to 4chan that only uses 10-14. even imageboards with the same software don't have this much shit blocked so it doesn't make sense to say scripts block posts with certain vowels. I'd appreciate it if an admin explained why instead of constantly being met with twitterfaggotry and aggressive anons calling me a scrote for pointing this out
so far I've heard this:
>scripts are blocking posts with certain vowelssome threads only have 2 posts and the tracking number still goes above a thousand
>it's due to cookiesI deleted my cookies in the vid I posted yesterday
>it's due to IPI've used many VPNs on lolcow since this weekend and the number still sits at two thousand on the same pages
>it's for search optimizations 4chan does the same4chan uses 10-14 not a thousand like lolcow
the most likely reason is that lolcow is using google analytics to mine users for money. so can an admin be honest about this? why do that when you have donations already?
No. 62203
>>62198I was in the bunker and most of us didn't buy it anyways, and like another anon mentioned in thread it was obvious the excel file wasn't theirs.
>>62198Oh so you're boardowners friend that made doxing threats against a random woman you thought was tranny admin and after saying you were wrong and sorry for your actions you're posting in this thread trying to convince us all that it was a man all along again.
>>>/ot/1659825>I never posted about spooky being admin. I was just asking why they had him in the discord server meant for private verified users.
>Also, didn’t I mention that I redacted that troon accusation quickly already? Why are you going in circles? lol. lmao even
No. 62204
>>62201Vagina is the inside and you shouldn't wash the inside,
nonnie…
No. 62206
>posts a reference to my post>respond to clarify> you're posting in this thread trying to convince us all that it was a man all along again. No I’m not. I am not participating in the slapflight because idk what’s going on or why we’re at this point again. I will clarify things about my posts though if you’re going to use them as “evidence”.
>>62203> I was in the bunker and most of us didn't buy it anyways, and like another anon mentioned in thread it was obvious the excel file wasn't theirs. There were a lot of them on the site so it would make sense that people would think it belonged to the owner of the site.
>Oh so you're boardowners friend that made doxing threats against a random woman you thought was tranny admin and after saying you were wrong and sorry for your actions you're posting in this thread trying to convince us all that it was a man all along again. The butterz (admin) account shared this site to people in other discord servers saying it belonged to them. I found it through asking a mutual about it. So no, it wasn’t against a random woman. Why did they share that website to people on discord if it didn’t belong to them?
Also, why didn’t they clarify the stuff about spooky when I asked about it in august?
I don’t know what’s really going on behind the scenes or what to believe but I do know that it’s
sus. So I will try to share what I know when I can.
No. 62222
>>62206>No I’m not. I am not participating in the slapflight because idk what’s going on or why we’re at this point again.You need to stop lying when you're terminally online and obviously in contact with them. Just like the schizophrenic retard posting about some criminal conspiracy. Let's look at some more of the posts you made on /ot/.
>You continue to push this agenda that whoever you don’t like works with Blaine or Elaine and is spamming cp. For someone who’s hurt against such an allegation you seem to throw it pretty willingly yourself.Wow that sounds a lot like what your doughboys have been peddling here and on cc. Why were you guys trying to reach out to somebody you believed was behind everything? Oh right because you know it isn't true.
You definitely don't know this anon that's describing the time your photos were posted on here and deleted by farmhands, and you blamed mods even though you posted your photos in a discord server when you're over 25 and should know better, but you have different standards for japanon and other users you guys chronically harass
>>61831 No. 62232
>>62227nta but at least in theory it was supposed to be a
terf containment board but ironically only the biggest misogynists congregated there. was it because of the blackpill thread?
No. 62233
>>62232If you post
terf views it'll start an infight there. There are several trans identifying female anons who will attack you if you say anything antitrans. The radfem screenshots thread got derailed by them for several days because someone posted a meme mocking tifs. They even admit to wanting to be men and feeling dysphoric in the blackpill thread.
I think the new tifs came because rita(a now-banned tif namefag) posted about the board in some lgbt 4chan threads.
No. 62235
>>62233The meme got mocked because it defended gender roles.
"women use pinterest and men use reddit" how is this gender critical?
No. 62238
>>62217While burritomin made /2X/ as a containment zone to try and lessen the infighting on /ot/, it did have the potential to be a good board. The main reasons that didn't happen are that the portion of the userbase that has been here a while and know how to access a hidden board just aren't that invested in feminist discussion to want to post on it regularly and the more recent arrivals that do, aren't familiar enough with image boards to know how to access it. By the time shaymin made it public, feminist discussion had already creeped it's way back to other threads on other boards which removed the need for /2X/.
Making it public also attracted newfags that couldn't handle different opinions so threads for more controversial topics surrounding feminism were full of infighting and the ability to have a peaceful discussion, constructive debate or simply share different opinions was destroyed. The board becoming a home for mentally ill TIFs that post blatant misogyny under the guise of being blacked pilled was just the final nail in the coffin. The board is a corpse that serves no real purpose anymore.
No. 62241
>>62240Yeah, this.
2X needs to be moderated harshly. It was meant to be a place for pink pill/gender critical/radfem discussion, not the opposite.
No. 62248
>>62246It's one poster but she's been ban evading and samefagging/replying in two parts to make it seem like others agree with her.
>>62247Yeah. Her posts sound really incoherent and usually like she's sending them during her manic episodes. She's been here for 6 months max and I still wonder where she found this site on, probably either tiktok or Twitter because she posts screenshots of both apps and seems to spend a large chunk of time on them.
No. 62249
>>62244We know those stuff but those changed, lol. When robots/r9k moids were allowed, the site was unusable. Newfags will see these rumors and tell them as if its an own when the changes actually bettered the site.
Next thing these newfags will request is for male posters to be allowed again.
No. 62256
File: 1693420468311.jpeg (5.63 KB, 302x167, download.jpeg)
MY PRECIOUS SITE IS BOMBARDED BY MEN TRANNIES NEWFAGS OH MY
No. 62258
>>62255>>62257NTA but you're making a false equivalency argument here. No one said they want people allowed to post about being openly male, but that still doesn't make this some feminist radfem imageboard (as was the original statement). Newfags think LC has always been 'female lolcow for womyn only we all must be extremists' to the max, when regular oldfags were never that adverse to men posting if they could just keep their retarded mouths shut about being men and blend in. Your argument of that they couldn't means nothing, because calling it a radfem site doesn't dissuade them, as we've seen. In fact, if you actually have such an insightful memory of the 'old days', you'd be capable of recalling that the whole thing didn't start purely because of men shitposting, but also because us bitches were being petty about how the men of 4chan treated female posters in the same scenario. That's literally why 'scrotes' caught on as an insult on LC, because it was the opposing term to them saying 'roasties'.
Bet you can look back in /meta/ catalogue even and you'll see a vast majority of users openly stating they don't care if men post here, just that they fit in/don't announce it. That was the majority opinion those days, because as petty as everyone was, they were infinitely less aggressive. The weird wave of 'THIS IS A FEMINIST RADFEM SITE KILL ALL MEN' was a newfag development that overrun the site when we had a completely absent admin/modteam. And I'm still not sure that I feel that admin/modteam did a worse job compared to our current one, which should really say something.
No. 62268
>>62266Read:
>>62267I'm beginning to believe this is just the troll being intentionally obtuse to steer conversation in /meta/ away from actual discussion or concrit. That or an anon samefagging who doesn't want to admit they jumped the gun on what they were replying to, so they started digging their heels in deeper. Most likely one innocent anon and a troll piggybacking off of them.
Cerbmin, I have no life. I work from home. I have openly stated my disdain for you and your staff's current approach to the site multiple times… But, if there is a position that is literally just sitting here in meta 24/7 wrangling it, I would apply. I can't see anything ever improving when the main way you should be receiving feedback is constantly being spammed.
No. 62270
>>62268That doesn't even make sense. I just think your opinions, historical revisions and desperate attempts to reheat them on meta over and over again are ultra retarded at best and manipulative at worst. I will always prefer the most spergy radfems on this website over moids.
Also very interesting that this spam pops up right as you try to advertise yourself as a janny. You aren't slick kek.
No. 62273
>>62266/cgl/ in it's current state is not a
valid comparison because 4chan itself went through a huge cultural shift. Around the time stamina rose was made because pt threads were banned on /cgl/, there was also the exodus to 8ch and gamergate. For unknown reasons moot intentionally alienated a lot of long term anons from various boards. This includes everything from /cgl/ to /jp/ and /v/. 4chan was unironically less of a misogynist coomer shithole back then because it was mostly nerds and weebs talking about nerd and weeb hobbies without being political. At the time 4chan was around 40% female.
No. 62274
>>62273It's a
valid comparison because it shows what happens if you don't aggressively moderate moids in female spaces, both through staff and board culture. I named it as an example for how threads degrade when moids infest it (pre ~2010 and current day cgl, it's essentially the same).
No. 62276
>>62274>>62274It's not a
valid comparison because it was the moderation of 4chan that drove the original userbase of 4chan to other sites. /cgl/ was far from the only female majority board on 4chan before 2014. It was a combination of introducing boards like /pol/ and allowing /r9k/ to turn into what it did, along with poor moderation that caused the cultural and demographic shift on 4chan. It had nothing to do with not controlling moids because 4chan as a whole was always majority moid.
No. 62277
>>62276How does that negate anything I said? Cgl was mostly female dominated for a long period of time and got worse after both moderation and users stopped cracking down on moid-like posts. The board was relatively fine, even with pol/incel moids shitting up 4chan as a whole, because gulls themselves told them to fuck off (or regrettably took the bait) and jannys then enforced it. Cgl's decline started when jannys stopped banning and deleting these type of posts, so moids first freely shat up popular threads like the vent thread and eventually started creating coomer threads again in recent years, which in return drove actual gulls away (together with other factors).
My point is that this is an example for what happens when you tolerate men in female spaces for too long. They first take the little finger and then bash your hand.
No. 62278
>>62272Honestly, it's not unreasonable they wouldn't hire someone who has continuously exhibited inappropriate behavior on the site. I don't feel any reason to hide that I don't agree with the direction the site is being taken in, though. I still want to help clean up /meta/ so actual crit can be properly discussed/voiced, even if the rules I'd have to uphold go against my own crit/feelings. If keeping /meta/ cleaned up isn't at least part of the responsibilities someone applying can be used for, though, I wouldn't see the point in applying. Guess the best I can do is apply and see what they say. If disagreeing with them means I can't help, oh well. I'm not going to lie just so I can do that.
>>62277NTA but I don't think men as a whole were the problem in that case. It all kind of came to a whole around the time moot re-made /r9k/ and it got twisted into some weird incel posting ground. There were still lots of men (even trips) in /cgl/ that were active and decent contributors before that. What was shunned were creepy/inappropriate posts, not specifically males. What aggravated all issues/pushed 'raids' was identity politics/the seemingly forced shift in user identity to 'women hate' causing stricter men vs women-isms on 4chan as a whole (further backed by the 'gamergate' garbage).
I still agree moid-posting should be strictly moderated, I don't think anyone here has even once disagreed with that. But strict moid moderation /=/ radfem/feminism, and LC culture has moved in the direction of being the same as r9k was - causing overall issues from an extreme identity politics/men vs women divisionism. I am, once again, not trying to say this means men should be allowed to post freely/openly like old /cgl/; we aren't niche enough anymore to have that kind of comfy space. I do think pushing radfemism-feminism to an extreme is part of the overall rot the site is experiencing, though. And I still stand by that historically, the userbase was brought together by mutual interest (in the case of /cgl/, nerds/cosplay, and the case of lolcow, gossip/cows), and not how much one can hate men or not, though. I think actual radfem/feminist anons should hate the vocal extremists more than anyone, honestly, because they're diminishing the real value of their cause. (And they probably do hate 'em for that!). Problem is, with anything, that extremist minorities tend to be the vocal majority. I move the subject to this because I think that anon, like myself, are more about having a reasonable, non-extremist userbase, and bringing up the reality of LC's origins allowing men helps point towards that outcome. Not because we actually want to condone or promote male-posters, as you rightfully fear.
No. 62281
>>62279(I'm
>>62278)
For clarification/to avoid any misunderstandings, I'm not trying to say the posters here do the exact thing as /r9k/ posters. Simply that part of what made /r9k/ such an issue in the overall culture shift of 4chan was it's push of women hating extremism as a divisionary tactic, and the push of men hating extremism here also causes issues. I am not against it for the sake of men, but due to the unnecessary problems and misunderstandings that arise out of it across the board, the negative audience it has attracted and the one track mindset it eventually attempts to enforce. Extremism in anything causes problems, plain and simple.
No. 62290
>>62286>>62289As that poster, I'd like to apologize in advance to anyone who felt my use of
>us bitchesis what made my post appear 'moid-like'. It's a term that's stuck with me from old days when on /cgl/ seagulls (particularly within lolita gossip circles) would ironically reference ourselves as such. In no way was I intending to allude to insulting our userbase as 'bitches' for rightfully hating the term 'roastie'. I was part of that group, still am. Wasn't really considering how that might come off when I made the post - sorry, anons.
No. 62294
>>62293Samefag, I agree with
>>62292I’m not even really that interested in feminism, I just hate moids. I’m sick of them shoving their opinions down everyone’s throats and making themselves the centre of every single discussion. They’re literally so whiny and unimportant to me.
No. 62299
>>62298>But in a way you are, because the feminism is what filters out moidsOh yeah really? How has that been working out? Hating men, trannies and camgirls doesn't make one a feminist. The bar is in hell.
>>62294>I’m not even really that interested in feminism, I just hate moids.Point proven.
No. 62300
>>62298I suppose we will have to respectfully agree to disagree then, anon. I fully believe with active moderation and ignoring/reporting what you deem as 'moid posts' that we could achieve a much better result than with anons clutching their petticoats and infighting over it. I also don't think it's made moids less welcome at all, if anything it seems to draw the most deranged ones to us. And I do think it alienates women and 'polices' them into 'needing to present a certain way' which, in my opinion, is honestly a lot more sexist against females than anything. If a post seems overtly 'moid-ish', then report it so the farmhands can look more into the user's post history. We've undoubtedly already alienated a ton of female posters simply because they had opinions some anon felt was too 'male-centric' and went on to completely derail or ruin a thread or discussion, which honestly, is kind of regressive and anti-feminist, if anything. And no, I am obviously not talking about the extreme out-there takes, which on their own should be banned for their content/bait regardless of whether it is a female poster or not.
You can still hate men without having it be a site standard to derail and infight over the fear of one posting.
No. 62302
>>62298Feminism is not an effective barrier against moids. Instead it does the opposite. The more men know they aren't wanted on a site, the more they are tempted to come and shit it up. Going to a feminist site and riling up the feminists is low effort and low hanging fruit. It's a cheap and easy way to get a reaction and give the moid a sense of satisfaction. Asherah's Garden was an LC spin off IB that was dedicated to feminist discussion. The main reason it died was because it was subjected to constant moid raids. Being an IB that was entirely feminist did nothing to protect it.
Before you accuse me of either being a moid or being pro-moid, I'm not. All I'm doing is stating what is easily observable and has been known since the dawn of the internet. Don't take the bait, don't feed the troll, because all it does is encourage them to come back.
No. 62309
>>62295>>62296NTA and not the anon you're talking about but when
>>62293 said
>“They’re ok as long as they don’t reveal themselves!” no, they aren’t. They should be made to feel as unwelcome and subhuman as we do in every other corner of the internet.You realize that has nothing to do with preventing them from visiting the site, right? We aren't stupid, it's an anonymous imageboard of course they will come. This has everything to do with how they are treated when they
do. And guess what? Of course moids come here and if they blend in, fine. But if they CAN'T blend in and keep their mouth shut, they deserve to be clowed and treated like subhuman.
Honestly, I feel like the both of the ideas can be united. You are indeed correct: we will never be able to prevent moids from coming here. But the point is that we should never
know. If we DO find out, then we treat them like shit. It's a win for us and a win for them if they can keep their dick in their pants, but most of them can't so…
No. 62321
>>62319As an /ot/-fag, I'd argue I see more male posts in /snow/ and /w/ than ever in /ot/ so you're wrong. Men are more likely to come here and defend their e-thots OR shit on e-thots than try and bait in /ot/. Wasn't the anon who kept bellasperging and shooping her genitals a male too?
You can't act like men are more likely to post on /ot/ because of radfem stuff when radfem stuff isn't common there as if /snow/ doesn't literally host porn.
No. 62325
>>62322>All political discussions on any imageboard always creates this issuethis. all political discussion should go to 2x and that's it, while bashing up trannies should be allowed on all boards (for obvious reasons) imo they're the only ones shitting up the boards alongside incels
>Even 4chan got worse (who thought that was possible) when /pol/ became a thingthis x2. moot hated pol. everyone outside of pol hates pol. even pol hates themselves probably
politics on an anonymous imageboard should be contained in a specific hidden board just like our 2x
as
>>62324 anon said, >But the presumption all anons have to conform to your ideology, or that this is a radfem site (ideas a lot of anons here hold) is ridiculous
also we're getting LCF 2.0 and hopefully things will get better
also some suggestions, i think we shall get an x board
No. 62329
File: 1693482286529.jpg (387.66 KB, 925x834, CrystalCafeGossip.jpg)
To whoever went to crystal cafe to complain about "misdirected misandry" of this website, get a life. Also not shocking that the misandry-haters come from crystal cafe which is known to be filled with either misogynistic femcels who are mad they'll never have a bf and trans identifying men. Crystal cafe is the source of these misandry hating anons and crystal cafe literally had %50 of users answer they were trans identifying with in a poll. It's literally trannies and their handmaidens crying about manhate they see here.
No. 62338
>>62337oh yeah, the one raid on a board outside /ot/ for every 30 /ot/ gets. of the few raids /snow/ had, most were at the hands of idiots from kf and
their thread got locked, so then the raids stopped! the others were just like cows and their followers throwing tantrums or troons raiding the troon thread which started on /ot/ and was moved to /snow/ after a few years kek
No. 62342
all three cow boards combined haven't been raided as many times as /ot/ was during the era of the original manhate threads alone, don't be delusional.
>>62339delusional. make a sister site, there's seriously no benefits to /ot/ staying on lc. it will never recieve the level of attention the users want from the mods and admin because it's just a shitty side board and its autistic culture is cancer to the rest of the site.
No. 62344
>>62337This, the other boards get raided at the same rate as /ot/. Maybe even more. I also don't understand why anons are trying to act like /ot/ is some recent addition that's ruining the entire site. /ot/ has been around pretty much as long as this site has been around, and If you only use the cow boards then it's really not something that will affect how you use the site. And a lot of newfags come from cow threads.
In reality this site gets targeted by men, not because of one board, but because it's a female imageboard. It's naive as fuck to think that if you cut off one board men will leave LC alone and we won't have anymore newfags. But it's literally super typical of farmers to find one thing to blame everything on and autistically fixate on it.
No. 62346
>>62342I'm not delusional, just being realistic. You probably weren't even around when /w/ and /snow/ AND /pt/ were absolutely being spammed to shit. You're the one being delusional if you think /ot/ is the reason. /ot/ gets what, the occasionally retarded thread made by a moid and some infighting. Meanwhile, /snow/w/pt were being spammed with cp and constantly having every single thread bumped for MONTHS.
Those boards where cows have their own thread will always bring wk's or and passersby that find the site because the cows mention those threads
>>62345>>62338>>62342Are you retards seriously going to pretend the MTF thread isn't want brings most of the mentally ill moids to this site? Or maybe even the vtuber or youtuber threads? Get fucking real KEK you've gotta be smoking crack
No. 62348
>>62346I was around long before /w/ and /m/ even existed, those raids were kiwifags.
>Are you retards seriously going to pretend the MTF thread isn't want brings most of the mentally ill moids to this site?again, the mtf thread was a product of /ot/, moron. are you trying to prove my point on why that board should've been taken out back and shot before it started fucking up the rest if the site? the dedicated tranny generals never would've existed if it weren't for the radfem outbreak on /ot/
No. 62366
>>62362>>62365(Ironically) there is a subtler troll here who constantly tries to derail meta/bait with this kind of tactic. Other posts they make are similar to these:
>>62304>>62270And when it doesn't work, they'll devolve into unsubtle ones like these:
>>62282>>62283Would not be super shocked if this
>>62333 poster wasn't correct in their assumptions about
>>62329, either, but 329 doesn't really strike me as the same style as the troll.
It's possible I'm totally wrong on some of the posts I quoted and I apologize if any of you are legitimate anons. But I do think that subtle troll has been sitting in meta and trying to instigate infighting by piggybacking on actual anons' posts.
Best thing you can do is ignore them if you do suspect it. They really enjoy accusing samefag, tranny or scote, and the lines
>you think you're slick>nobody is buying your shit>you're on your period>mask off>kek>specifically samefagging accusations without any basis to them or with no indication of who the person is samefagging asThese things are also normal user terms/behavior, which is what makes it more 'subtle' if you're just reading a handful of posts and not the whole chain. When you re-look through the entire chain, you can start to see these kinds of posts come in little bursts of when the troll has decided to visit /meta/. It's an abstract kind of retarded.
No. 62372
>>62366Forgot to mention, one of the reasons I brought up:
>Would not be super shocked if this >>62333 poster wasn't correct in their assumptions about >>62329, either, but 329 doesn't really strike me as the same style as the troll.Is because at a glance through the CC thread, it looks like they swap between here and there to try to get a reaction. I don't think they're the same person as the schizo discord drama thing (or whatever that is), but the two appear to co-align a lot. That might just be because one takes the opportunity to piggyback off of the other, though.
It's kind of weird, because they repeat the same terms/phrases to try to bait/instigate ad hominem, so I don't think they're a native lolcow user. It's more like they have a small repertoire of lines they think fit in here, or work for 'trolling'.
No. 62377
>>62375I would have assumed you were them trying to bait me if the Farmhand hadn't just rid us of their posts (thanks, by the way. I had been shitting on you guys and I'm actually pretty happy that someone seems to be patrolling /meta/ lately).
But, you thinking I'm them and me thinking you're them is exactly playing into the kind of thing they're after. It's the same kind of reason 'hi cow' became banned. It's more of why ignoring is the best choice.
No. 62379
>>62366I seldom post on lolcow and I posted
>>62282I'm not the subvert anon lol. Some of you have genuinely taken this website shite too seriously.
I hope you guys get some hobbies in your spare time.
No. 62389
>>62380I'm not in this fight but for the love of god, stop calling everyone and everything you disagree with trolls. It's so obvious when you post because you always call you everyone trolls and derail threads to talk about schizo stuff.
>>62333I posted it and the anons in those picture aren't me but the ones I was arguing with here who were saying feminism, radfeminism, misamdry, etc are the reason men are raiding(false) as if men don't race crystal cafe which is filled with handmaidens and women who would kill for a bf
No. 62390
>>62389huh? cc is filled with misandry, where did you get that idea from?
>I'm not in this fight>I don't have a dog in this raceyou write like that kiwischizo from days ago
No. 62391
>>62390Nta but /feels/ is entirely whining about relationships. Half of /b/ is like that too. The only misandry is in the
terf and pinkpill threads, but that's not most of the site.
No. 62394
>>62390>cc is filled with misandryHAHAHAHA
>>62391Yeah you're right. A lot of them come off as lonely women desperate for partnership. They believe getting a bf will fix their issues but since most cc-chans are neets, they can't make friends or get partners easily further making them lonely
No. 62398
>>62396Nta, I'm
>>62331 and it shows that those kind of people complaining about feminism and "misdirected misandry" like in the screenshot are the exact same ones trying to manipulate meta and trying to gaslight the moid problem as made up. You just sound mad that you've been found out.
No. 62411
>>62407It's not about race vs ethnicity but about /pol/fag terms
>>62410honestly I'd count those too, they're very annoying even if not /pol/fag but reddit or twitterfag
No. 62415
>>62397If you didn't say it, then you are not the anon who posted what I responded to.
>>62398I don't see any posts in meta that are saying Lolcow is not a feminist site that were not civil.
No. 62417
>>62416Omg stop being so butthurt. Are you the same anon that posted a picture of a insta-thot as the ideal woman to make anons mad when anons told him indian men were unattractive? Why the fuck do you anons even get so personally offended when these men are criticized? Are you like dating one or something?
Also funny that you literally made a racist statement about black people being violent to prove your point. Good job.
No. 62438
>>62424Wouldn't help, like
>>62436 said it'd just be met with VPN accusations. Even when farmhands clarify certain posters are different, there's always some schizo insisting that they know through the divine power of lolcor that they're wrong.
No. 62443
File: 1693628571294.png (14.44 KB, 1540x186, twitterspeak.PNG)
>>62442That's also what I'm wondering. I mean things like picrel where there's an obvious difference between their posts and the rest of the threads. It's not an issue of policing slang/terms I don't know; I know exactly what they're saying. But their integration is pretty bad.
No. 62447
>>62445It's about Kpop too, if that helps.
>>62444I thought it was because of the caps and certain words. I'm just wondering if things like this are even worth reporting or if I should just ignore and move on.
No. 62450
>>62443>mods please ban this person just because I don't understand what they are saying and I'm entitled.I'm one of the anons in you'r screenshot and I've been here since 2017. This really is motivation to stop using this dying site.
>>62449This is hilarious considering I was one of those anons who created the early Twitter threads and is the reason why a Twitter hate thread exists. Now seeing someone use that against me and call everyone a Twitterfag makes me regret creating the Twitter hate thread because it brought in autists who are now fixated on accusing anyone who dares use slang once of being a twitterfag.
No. 62462
File: 1693642990675.jpg (347.09 KB, 1080x1325, embedWHAT.jpg)
I am once again asking admins to review their mod team because this is absurd. Are these the farmhands that came back from vacation? I was banned 2 DAYS after the post was made. Did some bitter janny get mad and go through my fucking post history to find something to ban me for? There's nothing to fucking embed! The redtext reads "this is an imageboard", okay, that doesn't mean there's a way to embed profile pages.
"Learn how to embed at lolcow.farm/info". Well if we want to get specific, it says "When discussing Youtube videos, use the Youtube field to embed the video" and I wasn't discussing a YouTube video. I said all of this in my appeal, but never got a response. It's not even a cow board, I was helping anon identify a cat pic in /ot/ and got a 6-8 hour sitewide ban.
And before someone starts, no, I'm not ban evading, my ban is over.
No. 62466
>>62464Yes, and in that case the ban would be ridiculous, too. But it wasn't even a freaking tiktok. That's a link to someone's profile page.
>>62465I have no idea why somebody would have reported me either, two days later. That's why I think it was a mod who got mad at some shit I said to her in a thread and went through my post history for an excuse to ban.
A farmhand in the other thread did apologize for a shit ban about 3 weeks ago
>>>/meta/61070And while I appreciated the sentiment and taking responsibility at first, she also openly admitted to banning people without context to make her way through a bunch of reports. What a mess.
No. 62469
>>62462I don't think that janny realizes that there is nothing on the info page about embedding tiktok videos (although I'm pretty sure multiple anons have asked for how to embed youtube shorts and tiktok videos to be added to the info page). Also don't think they realize
why you have to add screenshots and embed, and that you don't always have to. I saw that conversation and a pic of that cat literally was already posted, so everyone who read that convo already knows what it's linking to.
No. 62470
>>62467Anon, is there any chance you are seeing impaired?
>>62466>she also openly admitted to banning people without context to make her way through a bunch of reports. What a mess.This really needs to be addressed. Cerbmin making some half-hearted post about that they've 'heard our feedback on modding concerns', blaming it on low staffing, saying they'll improve then have it continue really left a bad taste in my mouth. I'd hope they're doing something to help discourage farmhands from just pushing through reports. Without any further insight on it, it does feel like negligence from the admins or that they are not committing enough time or attention to team management. I don't even care about a new site, honestly, so if this is happening because their time is sunk into that I'm pretty disappointed. Hopefully I'm wrong on all fronts and just jumping to baseless conclusions.
No. 62472
>>62471That is only the case for milk with the purpose of archiving and if you want to show others something to discuss, but in this case the image has already been posted and somebody was asking for the cats profile. I've posted plenty of links before without ever getting banned so I don't think this falls under the imageboard rule. If it does then half of the oldweb thread for example should have gotten banned because so many links are being posted without screenshots provided.
I think this is just a case of the farmhand not getting the context.
No. 62473
File: 1693659620006.jpeg (130.13 KB, 1125x603, IMG_5622.jpeg)
>>62472No, it’s an actual rule in the info page
https://lolcow.farm/info No. 62480
>>62450i didn't tell
>>62440 to report that specific post from the screenshot (which was used as an example for “twitter lingo” but imo only the word “stan” firs that category) i just told her to report people who clearly don’t lurk moar/integrate. sorry if that came across directed towards you in particular
No. 62483
>>62462You've
always had to post a screenshot of links you post, doesn'tmatter if it's a video. Your post is no exception. This isn't a mod issue or admin issue, its anons willfully being newfags and then blaming everyone, but themselves. Somehow whiteknighting newfags over things that have been set in place as a rule for almost a decade shows the large amount of newfags trolling /meta/. It wasn't even a long ban. Learn2integrate, anon. I don't know what pond water other anons are drinking by saying you shouldn't have gotten a ban.
No. 62486
>>62485>help me find threadAnon, you know very well that thread has different context for posting links.
Anon saying it looks like it might look like a rex from the account they linked is reason to post a cap of the page the link belongs to, maybe a cap of the rex from a video on that account even. The previous post wasn't proof it could be that tiktok page. This isn't hard to understand.
No. 62488
>>62487The context didnt matter in this case because the previous post was not about the page anon is assuming the cat belongs to, thus
needing a screenshot of the tiktok page.
No. 62491
>>62475I'm going to assume you were trying to reply to me here:
>>62470The reality is that even though past admins and farmhands have had their fair share of their own faults, this level of feedback on poor ban choices clearly fueled by the farmhand's admitting they aren't checking context has never happened before. They weren't paid any of those times, either, yet managed to wrangle themselves well enough that even if bans took longer, they weren't ruining user contribution by autistically hyperfocusing on some vague offset of a rule that has never applied previously. From my PoV it looks like instead of managing the team, looking into these cases, addressing things ITT, they've gone with a "do the best you can for now, we're busy with the new site, when it's done we'll properly do all these things". But the longer and longer its all put off, the worse things get, and the remaining user base even willing to post will be weird newfags who've only ever known this ridiculousness. It sets a horrible precedent.
That admins/farmhands don't address these cases publicly themselves to verify rules or explain makes it even worse, as users are now left stepping on eggshells never knowing if something that has always be the norm will suddenly net them a ban. You can even try to say "oh it's just a short ban, so it's no big deal!", but it's been shown in ban messages posted in /meta/ that Farmhands consider if you've received previous bans in deciding your new bans. Since I can not imagine Farmhands who are not considering any form of context otherwise to be looking into the context of those previous bans, you'll end up having any active poster stuck in some vicious cycle of negligence. If you can't see what is happening or what will come out of this, then you are either a spring chicken or are severely short sighted.
No. 62492
>>62491And what gets especially frustrating about it all, is that anons will dismiss complaints about infighting bans as sore losers whining about their justified bans. I've received multiple bans for
explaining an infight or telling somebody they're being dishonest. But posters I report for being aggressive, accusing others of pedophilia/troonery, and attacking other anons in general will not be banned at all.
Someone will always make the argument "oh, you're engaging with an infighter so you're infighting". In a lot of these situations, the thread will be chill when an aggressive anon comes in flinging insults while mocking anons and being an asshole. Then when anons make fun of the sperg, they get a ban. Meanwhile farmhands are nowhere to be found for the entire day, the bad behavior is reinforced by a lack of bans and the other calmer anon being banned, and the offensive party is left to run rampant in other threads. And the punishment never fits. I don't think someone needs a 6 hour ban for making it clear that somebody is full of bullshit and then disengaging. Not to mention if I report other anons for something I get bans for, I get fucking banned for abusing reports.
And of course, if you say "hey, these farmhands are moderating unfairly. They used lolcow before becoming farmhands, and they're probably still using lolcow after becoming farmhands. Could they be displaying a bias against posters who disagree with them in threads?" you get called a tinfoiling schizo trying to psyop the user base. This website is full of clowns.
No. 62493
>>62491Nah I disagree. I literally got banned several time before cerbmin because I reported a few misogynistic posts as "possibly male poster, should have their post history checked" and another several times because I made fun of the trannyhands poster who lied about being a trad-wife although she used to sleep with several men and got abortions in her yout.
Both instances of vans I listed above probably happened because of them being mods or being close to them.
No. 62496
>>62494I'm assuming they're trying to say they disagree with my saying
>this level of feedback on poor ban choices clearly fueled by the farmhand's admitting they aren't checking context has never happened beforeExcept their experience doesn't really negate the "this level of feedback" part, so I'm guessing they just misread. If they didn't misread, then I'd have to stand by that, that still doesn't negate any of the issues addressed in my post.
No. 62497
>>62494I'm saying that I think it was worse before, although I agree that sometimes mods still ban wrongfully although it's less common.
>>62496I believe it's mostly an understaffment issue. Mods can't ever be nonbiased so yeah you're right at that.
No. 62512
>>62511Where is the discussion? Though they're probably crystal
femcels and not men, kek.
No. 62515
>>62513Because I'm the one who sent the picture from there. I went on crystal cafes lolcow hate thread only to see two anons(just like the two who were complaining about
terf/feminist/malehate shit) seethe about lolcow being misandrist and the misandry being misdirected.
They're probably the ones who infighted against
terf/misandry stuff and when no one agreed with them and their wishes to close down meta and other places anons could vent, they moved onto crystal cafe to complain there instead.
No. 62530
>>62519You're right I was being retarded. Crystal incels* there fixed it
>>62516Stop being new, anons going on there to complain about lolcow when their opinions don't get accepted here isn't anything new.
No. 62549
>>62537Ok, but still no new Pro-Ana Scumbags #102 thread.
(Yeah, I'm the same newfag that was whining a couple of posts ago and nobody cared about.)
No. 62550
>>62548Nah, I get what that anon means. It's not about wanting no moderation, it's that the site has become so over-moderated that it has hindered site culture and fostered a userbase of mini-mods hall monitoring every little thing to the point of constant aggression/hostility if someone so much as breathes wrong. It isn't even the kind of lurk moar culture enforced by the userbase that used to wrangle newfags. And even if you are for that level of moderation, the lack of consistency, transparency or official clarification has turned it into a banana republic. The one thing I disagree on from that poster is the emphasis on site upgrades, though. Cerbmin seems to have said their priority is on technical upgrades/new website, but I think fixing moderation issues/culture issues should have a much bigger priority to that.
>>62549Hey newfriend, there is actually a thread stickied in /pt/ to make these kinds of requests. Try there. Or, if you do want to attempt it yourself, look at other long time threads or previous pro-ana ones and try to copy their formats. If you put effort/time into it and mention it's your first thread, even if you bung a couple things up people will understand. Generally there is no point to making a new thread if there is not consistent milk to post, though, so only go for it if the milk has been flowing (I haven't so much as glanced at pro-ana threads for years so can't help you determine that one).
No. 62555
>>62550Thank you very much nonna, I'll ask in /pt/.
Pro Ana threads have regular milk (skimmed, of course). They usually open one thread a month or so. Idk what happened this time, nobody started it yet.
I could try to open it myself, but I would probably get the "shit thread" badge because (blogposting here) English is not my fist language and I also don't know every cow and their problematics.
Thank you anyways!
No. 62573
>>62572one or two posts in an /ot/ thread isn't derailing or infighting, anon. /pt/, /snow/, and /w/ are the only boards that are supposed to have strict moderation in those areas because keeping discussion there in order actually matters aa those threads document cows. /ot/, /g/, and /m/ have never even been effected by hellweeks for the very reason that they're supposed to be lax. off-topic is literally the name of the board, derailing, infighting, and bait has always been and still is the vast majority of what goes on in there, but now with erratic vibe-based bans thrown in.
>Some anon was wishing aids on people and asking how they thought about jews in /ot/this is racebait, anon. I said racebait is one of the things that should always be banned.
No. 62592
>>62587I think all the old mods did besides one super boomer mod more or less, yes. we rarely get farmhand posts these days and anons have complained about unmoved threads, another indicator that there are few to no real mods active (jannies don't have the privileges to do things like that). the admin is likely behind the few we do see.
as for jannies, I never talked to those jannies who were constantly kept in quarantine like retarded chilren, but I know she never paid much attention to what they were doing or properly trained them unless they made a huge fuckup like the one who was infighting with some anon and decided to expose their ip kek. they might be seen as disposable. mods on life support, new waves of tardjannies who would never be trusted enough to become mods to act as a bandage to the undermoderation problem was how it used to be. pretty sure the choa-chans were the last jannies to be promoted to mods while I was there.
No. 62595
>>62589>>62592so why did everyone leave? was the event you mention here
>>62586 the Christmas fiasco? how long ago did all this happen? is everyone too scared of retribution to post proof?
No. 62598
>>62595those jannies had fleas…
>>62594it happened slowly over the span of a few years, it wasn't like we all quit at once. but the tantrum I mentioned was the beginning of the end, yuge things changed that day.
>was the event you mention here the Christmas fiascois that what you call it? yes, that new site was in the works for ages, none of us thought the fabled revamp would ever happen because the person we're talking about is incompetent as fuck. but code monkeys were found, announcements were not made, alcohol was consumed, the rest is history.
No. 62600
>>62598the December 2022 tantrum where she said she quit the site and we were 'making her work on Chrismtas', or some other tantrum? and what were the reasons for mods leaving?
>>62599I'm saying that if you get banned for this, you'll be vindicated, because why would the new shiny cerbmin care about ancient history?
No. 62606
>>62597what do you want us to do, make a thread on the site owner? we know it's not schizo, you'll be stuck in the dark no matter what you choose to believe unless some old mod decides to do a tell all with caps so mind your business if you think we're just makin stuff up.
>>62600the tantrum I refer to is "g"'s tantrum
>>62602I don't care enough about this to post proof but I don't have much I could post anyways, I'm stupid and couldn't have predicted this would happen. back then she was nice to me, we had common interests, and I felt bad for her. I had no desire to do that. it's all relevant to why the board is the way it is. she never reads /meta/ so what you get is what she decides, doesn't matter. if you're lucky a tard janny might be lurking in silence, or maybe they're just here to defend their shitty moderation choices.
No. 62615
File: 1694017741341.jpg (55.52 KB, 570x571, 1680015521282.jpg)
>>62607dunno if anyone has proof other than knowing her and her past behavior, and it lines up with that which we know. the leavening was before the admin "changes," the quarantined jannies were quarantined away from the big kid info, and she fully wiped the modcord we were active in for a long time without notice at one point. she covered her tracks.
>>62608you know, I thought the same thing or that it was all blaine's incomprehensible schizospeak. I changed my mind. you only know what you've been shown, it isn't hard to pretend to be someone else. ignore it.
No. 62623
Having to resort to posing as former staff and using stale info dating back over 6 years, the desperation is sad.
> the only 2 mods who did anything became kpopfags and went on to make choaThis is how we know you're full of shit. They were already kpgfags and made it obvious on discord. "We all left", it would be a better lie if you weren't going off the vendetta of people who moderated 4 years ago and claiming that the site is running on a one man show.
>>62581It's creepy scrote behavior.
No. 62626
>>62616>>62620fuck kf. it didn't simply go down, this all happened over the span of years over which we became very inactive and rarely used the site at all. not 6 years ago like the smooth brain said though.
>>62621agreed. she really never sounds any different in her public posts, it's only the frequency that fluctuates which is also in character. samefagging is too.
>>62618that's the true question. might be a mix of spite, stubbornness, the constant paranoia of any potential admin applicant being a trojan horse for josh, and ego.
No. 62672
>>62587Dude one day, shaymin literally just posted in the janny discord that she had found a new admin and that we would all probably be fired and replaced, like??????? Are you joking?
She told us we could either continue to janny until we had our privileges removed or just fuck off then
No. 62675
>>62674you don't see a single funny thing about telling jannies that
this site already had that they may as well pack up
No. 62678
>>62676>salty about a new adminWhy? Like getting upset that you're getting a new boss; doesn't really matter that much
>they should all be replaced if one is a fuck-upunnecessarily drastic
No. 62682
>>62679fuck it, whatever, you probably right
I forgot, channers aren't channers anymore; the other staff probably had cliques I wasn't privy too lmao
back in my day,
all jannies were autistic shut-in friendless social-rejects even online, the way God intended