/2X/ - (XX)

>>3716
Okay, where are the links then?

>>3717
if the invite's expired, feel free to ask for a new one in the chat!

>>3698
No, it's mostly one butthurt anti-gc/pp anon falseflagging like a lunatic.

/ot/ rules apply for now. If you have rule requests or any complaints then you can post about it here >>>/meta/11760
Don’t make threads targeting specific nationalities, ethnicities, or races. You can discuss policy and government all you like but don't racebait. It is a global rule violation, this isn't /pol/.

Does anyone happen to have an invite code for Ovarit?

i decided to order a customizable engraved ring from catbird that says ‘radfem’ and after 2 weeks i got an email saying they ‘can’t produce it’ with no explanation. i’ve historically dropped sooo much money on their jewelry in the past but i’m obviously done with them now. i can’t say i didn’t expect it but i’m still incredulous. i could see them rejecting it if i asked them to engrave ‘terf’ but radfem? really?

I hate fuckers like these so much! These spergs who keep replying to radfem or GC tweets with their religious spergery.
No, they/thems don't call themselves that because they're possessed by demons you fucking morons. I hate people who attribute everything to religious bullshit so much. It's like thinking the sun rises every morning due to the sun god or something, or that fire is produced by magic. Explaining what you don't yet understand with nonsensical religious thinking.

The other day I saw a bunch of replies under a rafdem tweet about TIFs, it was a bunch of women sperging about TIFs not being "in harmony with their feminine divine" or some retarded shit like that. I FUCKING hate this "feminine/masculine divine" shit. What are they smoking? You're not being helpful AT ALL. Aidens hate being told that they have to be feminine due to their reproductive organs and that's one of the big reasons they troon out, you're only making it worse you assholes. Fucking idiots.

Anyone noticed how liberal feminist will call themselves radical feminists and push actual radical feminist views out? How can they believe they are radfems if they dont believe in sex based oppression

>>20133
The tinfoil hater in me thinks they're agents to purposely derail any attempts of female solidarity, why else would you get mad that RADICAL feminisms rejects men in dresses trying to larp as women?

The more rational part of me just thinks they're too retarded to see how they're active participants of patriarchy via being delusional simps for trannys because they can't resist the virtual ass pats/social credits they get for virtue signaling on behalf of men. The only reason Radical feminism became a thing is because these types of women kept calling themselves feminist while continuing to worship at the altar of cock n balls and throwing other women under the bus for a man any chance they get.

>>20115
The funny part of that image is I've known several low wage men, some even disabled, who got married and had families that looked happy from the outside. They all never shit talked their wives or kids in public, and were very proud of them. They also all fucking worked hard and didn't play video games. I can only assume that the scrotes who say they didn't have the money to get married were the ones who never tried to launch at all, or the ones who thought they would buy a trophy bride eventually, so they used and discarded normal women until they were too old and gross to get any date, and too poor for the trophy bride.

>>20113
“oh they’re just little kids” god i fucking hate this so much, they know what they’re doing even if they’re 8. it’s not like they’re newborns. you should talk to the parents of the boys

>>20120
Recently saw a Reddit post about someone’s 15-16 year old boy sexually assaulting his 13 year old brother due to porn exposure. The “he’s just a kid” argument present in the comments chilled me. These people spoke like that age means you’re a child and don’t understand nonconsenting sexual contact is wrong. Maybe at age 5 that would make more sense but at 15 you’re smart enough to know better, that’s high school age ffs. A lot were pitying the boy saying he must’ve been abused and was only acting out because of that. When boys assault and traumatize innocent people, everyone has to jump through hoops to not only explain but make him out to be the real victim. Funny how girls deal with child abuse and porn exposure at a larger scale and it usually doesn’t turn them into abusers of their peers. There are too many apologists for men, they’re always treated with more empathy and consideration.

I just needed to put this somewhere. They are referring to a 12-year-old girl with macromastia, for context. I don’t even bother responding to things like this because there is no point. There’s no getting through to them if they deny that boys bully girls for their looks. But more so than that, they never seem to grasp that sexual attention is not a universally positive experience. Why can’t they understand that getting sexual attention and “hit on” from boys and men would not be a positive thing for a 12-year-old girl? It’s sexual harassment and it’s traumatizing. That in and of itself would be enough to make her self-conscious and unhappy, even if no girls ever bullied her.

Every single day at every job I have ever had I have been sexually harassed or assaulted by men. I am 90% done with my schooling and just want to drop out because my job would require me to touch men sometimes (medical) and speak to them nicely. I just can’t do it anymore, I can’t stand to speak to them nicely and I never want to be around them. Wtf do I do? I’ve been thinking about this all morning, then I ordered lunch that costs twice my hourly pay and the delivery driver watches me eat for 15 whole minutes in his car in the parking lot before coming BACK into my building and giving me a piece of paper with his number on it. Epic

>>19740
it actually started in the 1970s with martine rothblatts zine

What is this fucking bullshit? I just looked up "Intersex" on Wikipedia:
>Intersex people are individuals born with any of several sex characteristics including chromosome patterns, gonads, or genitals that, according to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, "do not fit typical binary notions of male or female bodies".
>"do not fit typical binary notions of male or female bodies"

>>15872
>Its just one of the many things they promote to sow division in the United States
While they undoubtedly used this and many other things to their advantage, Russian intelligence is not alone. The American elite also has many ways to sow division among the normal population to keep them distracted and loyal, especially if it's profitable in some way as is the case of transgenderism. See:
>>15847
This was definitely not just a "tinfoil", it was definitely the truth. They do it on imageboards too, we have proof that the feds used 8chan. They do it on any website that's big enough. They've done it countless times in real life too.
Think about it, aside from those Russian or whatever agents there was already an American pro-troon agenda funded by tranny billionaires and their corporations. Besides, gendies also exist in Russia so it can't all be a big Russian conspiracy, trannies over there were able to change their legal sex, get surgeries and everything, and now that they're apparently banning SRS it's being used in western propaganda to attack Russia. It's a global phenomenon, and I believe it originally started in Western Europe (though pedophilia and autogynephilia are just male nature).

So a fembot is simultaneously the ultimate male fantasy, but also a perfect metaphor for trans women? Interesting. Love when feminists try to be inclusive but say the quiet part out loud.

>>20036
>on Wikipedia
Nona wikipedia will allow chaging of a child rapists pronouns the second he says he's just a little girl like his victims. They've also scrubbed articles about how like half of male serial killers in the US were also cross dressers and similar things that make trans people "look bad" no matter how true it is. It's not new, wikipedia isn't as good and honest as they claim to be.

>>19847
Not yet, I don't have all the bead colors yet but I also thought of sharing it here! So I will surely do it when they will be complete.

>>19856
i'll wait nona! i'm in a similar situation as you with the acronym's recognition in my country. i even remember some literal tiktok-poisoned children writing "terfs are losers" in chalk on the road

>>19867
And it's done! At first I wanted to buy some beads online, more round maybe but yesterday I went to a local crafts shop and spotted these. I think the purple color looks nice. In the future I want to try same pattern but with beads made of stones or do a pattern with letters as I described it here >>19683

>>20126
nice, but I would have gone with a purple that looks less blue

>>20129
Good idea, I'll look for beads like that. In real life it looks more purple than in this photo but it's a darker purple though.

>>20044
>thinking of female children as whores or virgins, in misognistic Madonna whore absolutes
Think of that next time you go on another tirade calling a lesbian a pedo forrrr saying her girlfriend's homophobic, 4chan-indoctrinated teenage sister asking to sit on her lap for various reasons is weird/hateable/vent-worthy. Same for the girl, who has a boyfriend, framing OP rejecting her as bullying to her parents because all she really wants is to hurt her sister and get attention. She has already made homophobic, nonsensical comments she's repeating mindlessly at her sister from incel circles (like infertile foid). The comment about her sister not being able to close her legs even as a kid makes me think this girl might be coping with a sexual trauma in her own life by acting out inappropriately, which is actually sadly common.

Reading that post of complaint after complaint and translating it to "this is a man fantasising about a porn scenario of a little girl wanting to fuck him" is the Madonna/whore complex I was pointing out anons were projecting onto the girl and her edgelordery. Your essay just doubles down how she couldn't possibly be acting out inappropriately or falling for terminally online tradthot takes at her impressionable age, and only a degenerate male would ever imagine a girl like her existing. Saying you fear for their child is sick. There's no way you'd even say that if you thought the post was a man making everything up.

>>20044
It's a pedophile, gender doesn't matter. Pedophiles notoriously assume underage girls(or boys) are showing interest in them when they actually are not, it's a common phenomenon. Anyone defending that anon is either uneducated, misogynistic or the anon her(!)self.

Pedohpiles like that shouldn't be allowed to have kids, I hope she doesn't hurt her own child, although it probably genetically isn't hers so the child is in danger. When a pedophile is in the same household with a child who doesn't share his DNA, the child is a possible victim.

>>20051
>Think of that next time you go on another tirade calling a lesbian a pedo
No, criticising women for their own retarded actions and own self inflicted misogyny whether internalised or not is not going on a "misognistic tirade". Choice feminism has already been discussed and debunked ITT alone >>19920. You can't be safe from criticism because woman, that's as moronic as unironically criticising my post because it's long. The poster being lesbian whether it's a male larping or an actual lesbian woman is irrelevant to them being retarded in their thought process.

>Saying you fear for their child is sick. There's no way you'd even say that if you thought the post was a man making everything up.
I'm not this anon >>20009. Whether it's made up or not is irrelevant to my criticism. I'm confused as to what has you offended about my post. The insinuation that women think in Madonna whore absolutes IS the offense, and it seems obvious to me that op didn't even see the Madonna whore dichotomy in the first place. I'm not reinforcing it by saying children are children and should at the very least he excused from this at an age where they are very likely not even sexually mature let alone mentally. The child in the post could be very real but it's still a child so I'd hope people don't treat a childs words as serious as an adults. I don't "fear for the child" and no one is projecting onto this child, whatever you mean by that. The child could well and truly be fucked up with terminally online beliefs in which case I do feel bad for her because the poster is retarded and she apparently has no one who can talk to her about how fucked up this belief is. I only said it was sick to make the assumption that other women see children as whores or virgins (in their own disgusting language). Also if op is a woman, damn.

>>20050
I'm giving my thoughts on the language used in their post based on my experiences and opinion, you're free to give yours too. Or you can toss around petty moid internet insults that contribute nothing though if you want.

>>20054
I think it's a dedicated troll as the story doesn't sounds believable, I agree with your post.

this is one of the more egregious pickme groups i've seen. wouldnt be surprised if it was run by a moid in disguise

>>20079
Hazlooo, porfa, aunque si con verificación de voz.

>>20088
>>20091
>>20092
Bueno me puse a ver un tutorial, y es bastante más elaborado de lo que pensé armar un server, lol. Más que nada por el hecho de las medidas de seguridad/privacidad que hay que tener en cuenta y eso. Y bueno, porque usé muy poco Discord tbh.
Armé uno así super improvisado y seguramente hecho para el culo, pero de estar, está. Va a haber que ir mejorándolo de a poco porque genuinamente estoy mega boomer con esto, lol. Además dispongo muy poquito tiempo en el día para andar administrándolo sola (trabajo y estudio así que RIP tiempo libre), así que alguna(s) más me podría(n) dar una mano en lo posible
Alguien tiene idea cómo me conviene integrar gente? Es mejor que deje mi discord, me agreguen ahí, y una vez que verifique que sean mujeres, ahí las agrego al server? O es mucha vuelta? Pls ayuda
También me interesa saber qué condiciones mínimas les parecería que tenga el server, como para ir viendo eso. Ya dijimos lo de la verificación mínimo por voz (y si es necesario, videollamada), y bueno, tener al menos 18 años (o más, si es que les parece muy baja esa edad). Después no se que más podría ser que sea escencial para empezar. Hay otras reglas/requisitos que creo que podemos ir arreglando de acuerdo a cómo vaya el server.
También consideré que quizás podamos publicitar un poquito el server (una vez que esté más pulido) en radblr. La comunidad de ahí de habla inglesa es bastante conflictiva, pero en español creo que no está tan nefasta…creo. Siempre veo chicas que postean sobre sus servers, pero todos los que vi hasta ahora son en inglés.

>>20094
Si quieres deja tu discord en el friend finder thread y de ahí que te agreguen
de que país eres nonni?

>>20095
nta pero nonna mejor pon tu discord en el email field, asi queda oculto a simple vista, pero si pones tu cursor encima puede leer que esta escrito

Bueno ahí dejé mi contacto en el Friend Finder si a alguien le interesa! Hice lo que sugirió >>20102
No dije explícitamente que mi contacto era para después unirlas a un server para no regalarme tanto, lol. Obvio que no hay manera de ser inmunes a los moids, pero poner "server radfem de discord" así tal cual iba a ser demasiado llamativo creo yo. No se, vamos a ver cómo resulta todo.
Reitero una última vez que el server está hecho medio para la mierda, así que no se espanten de que esté completamente pelado y triste (?)

>>20095
Soy de Argentina, nonita!

It’s so annoying how “bisexual” women who exclusively date men and have no desire to be with another woman scream about how disgusting men are and how they are barely even attracted to them and yet somehow all of their partners happen to be men? If you think men are that disgusting why don’t you just find a woman and not date men at all? most of them somehow always end up dating men and seethe when a lesbian doesn’t want to date them. these same bisexual women will constantly say shit like “I love boobs so much” just straight up sexualising women and yet they would never enter a romantic relationship with another woman. like jesus christ women are more than just a pair of tits. I genuinely believe that most women who are apparently bisexual aren’t bisexual at all. I feel like pornography can be blamed for how even women sexualise other women and view them as sexual objects, which does not make them bisexual. it’s fucking laughable how these women will reduce women down to their bodies and yet lesbians are supposedly the predatory ones.

>>20086
Straight and bi women can complain about men, kek. Let them be, incel. They're disgusted by most ugly men and date the ones they find attractive, I doubt bi or lesbian women find majority of women attractive either, I personally don't.

>>20105
NTA but lesbians aren't incels for disliking how bisexual women who date men treat them, all the while complaining about these men just to put up with it for sex. Why can they complain about their dating pool but lesbians can't? For the love of feminism please stop watering down the word incel by using it as a buzzword and easy insult at lesbians like a tick. You're not slick implying lesbians are seething at these women just for having sex. As if lesbians are like jealous men for complaining about retarded behaviour being unattractive, please.

>>20086
Bis on the whole honestly act like the men they date.

Why are all the lesbian girls my age so political? I’m a zoomer born in 2001 and all the girls my age are just…unable to talk about their love of women without turning it into politics. You can always tell too, they either go “I love all women, trannies are women too and if you won’t suck girldick you’re evil” or “I only date women cause men are the worst and are rape apes so the only safe option is lesbianism” or my least favorite “I’m a he/they/it lesbian and I’m so proud, look up how many used to exist I’m so valid” I just wanna date a girl without her bringing up politics or identity for one minute. Occasional talk is fine but it’s literally all the time

>>20114
I'm in my late 20s and I think in general "LGBT spaces" have become way more political over the last 10 years. Back then I wouldn't expect to see queer used as a catch-all term but now it's everywhere. It also seems like there's been a big increase in people saying they're poly and larping as commies kek

>>20090
I'm talking about /ot/ and the multitudes of male worship threads but I would not step foot in such a unholy place kek.

>nta but i sure won't read the rest of what you wrote then lol
Ok trad legend.

True pain is when the only people who also hate troons are tradtards that literally uphold the same gender roles, and behaviors troons use to justify their misogny.

>>20107
I don't know how such braindead retards found this hidden forum and mistook it for them, but whoever linked it and advertised it as a dump for "average fathers and mothers against LGBT degeneracy" essays can rot.

>>20107
>True pain is when the only people who also hate troons are tradtards that literally uphold the same gender roles
bad luck with your community then, most people against it are gays and "non conformists" who are fed up with being lumped in with their degeneracy. Troons being for gender roles (while of course claiming to not be) is almost always brought up as a reason why they're retarded in every anti-troon space i'm in

>>20087
AYRT
>On this site alone it's still a stretch to consider degrading het shit degrading
You're probably talking about specific things that a lot of lolcow users who aren't radfems don't consider to be related to what I said. I meant those who think porn or the other things are okay are not sane. If you think the average lolcow user is insane because of this, then so be it. But I wasn't even talking about free speech on lolcow.
>But you lose me with the "mothers and fathers" spiel and "outnumbering them"
Whether you want it or not, there's a lot of parents who are concerned about tranny shit and don't want to see their kids (especially their daughters) being sucked into the tranny cult. If you want to stop something as powerful as the tranny lobby you'll have to work together with the "heteropatriarchal normies" who represent the majority (thus outnumbering TRAs) and agree with you on this one, you cannot do it alone. This doesn't mean that you're abandoning your ideals and principles, or that you support the patriarchy. It also doesn't mean you're becoming a tradfag. Parents want to protect their kids from a predatory cult and I think that reason is enough to form a temporary alliance with them.
>They adhere to strict gendered rules just like the average mothers and fathers you speak of even if they claim otherwise and a male wants to call themselves lesbian which is just oxymoronic. Their rigid gendered behavior is literally the same shit mothers and fathers embody and push for.
>"The average mother and father" literally uphold the gender roles that troons use to justify what a male and a female is in the first place e.g pink = female, blue = male.
Then this is the opportunity to try to educate them on that, make them realize that troonism was able to thrive because the foundation (gender roles and stereotypes, misogyny, sexism) had already been laid. Not that all of them will listen or change but it'll at least open the eyes of many. You can't expect total change and a feminist utopia to happen overnight. It's also a chance to show everyone that hating trannies is not just a right-wing thing, this is a chance to take that position back from true tradfags.
>Adult is a odd caveat here, iirc in SPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>20135
>This all-or-nothing stubborness of yours and other autists on this board is part of what makes you both miserable and unsuccessful as activists.
Nta, I fully agree with you nona. Some radfemmy nonas have gone way overboard and are out of touch with reality so all they have is seething online in unhelpful ways.