[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/2X/ - (XX)

gender critical and female politics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog

The catalog has been updated, see the update post for more details

File: 1578980825578.jpg (65.24 KB, 1128x635, el-viento-se-levanta-imagen-de…)

No. 1821[Reply]

With the admin's verdict on /2X/ (and pink pill related topics as a whole) announced, where should farmers who want to discuss female politics head to?
The current options seem to be:
>New imageboard
>Migration to other, existing imageboards
>Migration to Reddit
As far as the first option goes, we may be able to create a space on https://8kun.top/ or https://endchan.net/ using their board creation functions. The only downside is that both places are also home to all sorts of unsavory males (virulent racists, pedophiles, pornography junkies, manosphere users, etc).
We could also create our own standalone board/site, though we'd need someone with the proper skills for that. Post any thoughts/suggestions on /2X/ migration here.
450 posts and 46 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 3717

>>3716
Okay, where are the links then?

No. 3718

>>3717
if the invite's expired, feel free to ask for a new one in the chat!

No. 3721

>>3698
No, it's mostly one butthurt anti-gc/pp anon falseflagging like a lunatic.



File: 1576671614730.jpg (19.89 KB, 768x512, Knna2Lf.jpg)

No. 1[Reply]

This is a test-board to assess if a female space for politics will be sufficient in giving everybody what they want while removing some tension in /ot/.

This is not currently permanent but, it can be.
If this board works out then I will make it a permanent board next year. For now you all have the choice of posting in the /ot/ thread or making new threads here. It's your choice.

No. 2

/ot/ rules apply for now. If you have rule requests or any complaints then you can post about it here >>>/meta/11760
Don’t make threads targeting specific nationalities, ethnicities, or races. You can discuss policy and government all you like but don't racebait. It is a global rule violation, this isn't /pol/.



File: 1726295862394.jpg (24.3 KB, 450x360, 360_F_43378187_2UghtI4Fj2mec0R…)

No. 33686[Reply]

Report rulebreaking posts in this thread and do not respond. This thread will be permanently locked if the state of posting does not improve.

A thread for blackpill feminism. Discuss heterosexual dynamics, female psychology, and the flaws of the feminist movement here.

If you disagree with the entire premise of the thread, you have no reason to enter it. Remember that entertaining disingenuous liberal feminist debate is running around in circles.

Previous thread >>31633
915 posts and 58 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 35266

>>35260
> If most women didn't let it happen I wouldn't feel dysphoric. Many women prostitutes themselves, most women don't see a problem with that, some even find it hot and support it.

that is the ultimate blackpill that most feminist spaces won't allow me to say, that women actively partake in their own humiliation and submission.
most of the feminist places are now run either by libfem ( empowered prostitutes kek) or conservatives larping as radfems ( only seethe over troon issues while actively being married to their nigels and shit out moidlets- basically average ovarit user)

suffragettes worked so hard for some liberation women have today and instead of working hard and taking up top jobs in every field they take the easy and degrading route of selling their bodies online and call in empowering
i will never have any respect for this kind of women, they are one of the reasons males consider women inferior too mentally because they are actively calling themselves sex objects for male use and dont blame everything on socialization, if that was true this thread wouldnt exist

No. 35267

>>35265
What do you mean?

No. 35268

>>35265
this is the last time entering this thread, only lack of brain people in here, only two are serious in the main topic discussion.

No. 35269

>>35267
in short, she doesn’t think that femininity and passive submissive psychology is female biology. she deny that all females regardless of sexuality are fucking pickme ewes slaves.

No. 35270

>>35263
Ok pooner



File: 1670623763479.jpeg (36.75 KB, 474x558, radfem.jpeg)

No. 6960[Reply]

A thread for non-specific topics related to radical feminism and pro-women things. Let's vent, talk about our rights, our health, the porn industry, the makeup industry, sexism, misogyny, gender role madness etc. and share our resources and stories.
472 posts and 63 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 35179

>>35161
>Remember what happened to taylor swift?
Still no women would be harmed. Why do we care what men do behind our backs? I wouldn't care if moids made realistic porn of me because I don't care about them. They already can draw realistic porn of Taylor Swift if they want to. Now should we ban internet?
>Disrupting a dead woman’s likeliness also ruins the mourning of those around her.
I don't agree with you. Dead bodies are just piece of fleshes. Women who are vegetables are still alive sentiment beings, individuals. I would probably have sex with a dead body for example.(baiting)

No. 35184

>>35179
> If I put on a wig and a top hat, Abraham Lincoln's and started encouraging kids to do drugs,
The point of using one’s likeness does not mean you are actually them, but yes you are using his representation. The point isn’t that it’s fictional and therefore not real so nobody cares, the point is that it’s representing real people therefore affecting them and people in their lives. if you think chat bots made to represent real people somehow are disconnected from the person who it’s created to embody, then you cannot comprehend a representation. It’s not that it’s real, it’s that it’s degrading, disrespectful, misogynistic, and used to harass women/girls and their families. More should be done by lawmakers to regulate AI so women are protected from more of these cases
>PRIVATE to type like Taylor Swift and depict her as an evil rapist murder, is NOT illegal
When were we discussing the current legality of it lol? The point is of what regulations could be put on artificial intelligence in the future and the morals of it now. The point i’m making in the hypothetical is that that’s a representation of taylor swift, legal or not. either way using one’s likeness to create a chatbot without their consent, or if they’re deceased, with their family’s disdain should be illegal. I don’t see how this would harm women who like fictional chatbots either. You should know how little restrictions there are on artificial intelligence there is right now. There’s pressure from investors and bigtech is going to shove it in anyways. It’s undeniably rushed and has no protections on who the AI represents, so my point is that AI should have further regulations due to how accessible it is. With other mediums it’s much easier to check for what is legal or not. AI not so much. It’s clearly a medium that needs restriction and the cases i’ve used of women/girls and their families being harassed with its uses are clear reasons as to why.

No. 35185

>>35184
You're replying to wrong anon I guess. AI porn doesn't have to include real women tho? These could be fictional created women

No. 35186

>>35185
it’s trained off of real women though, also oops lol i didn’t even realize i did

No. 35253

>>35043
loneliness hurts women more. Should women who can't make friends or have a social life kill themselves then? so some worthless roastie doesn't have an ai chatbot made based on her which ultimately doesn't actually harm her unlike image generators.
Stop acting like you care about women when you see socially inept women as not real women but autists who should kill lthemselves.



File: 1648663380053.jpeg (411.01 KB, 1206x1761, 242F09AE-982D-407E-81BA-14EDA8…)

No. 4446[Reply]

Post your memes here, or request for others to make a meme for you.
1181 posts and 832 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 34967

File: 1727961842952.png (42.84 KB, 751x325, uCUEXco.png)


No. 34992

>>34967
The qrts are probably sending this woman rape threats

No. 35193

File: 1728524891165.png (774.9 KB, 1169x1105, KZDdyGb.png)


No. 35209

>>35193
Oh wowza I probably am an afab trans woman, for I see moid shit online and run off to my safe space where I feel comfortable and happy (lc)

No. 35230

File: 1728749454744.png (741.83 KB, 1080x1360, qbXThr3.png)




File: 1637582008671.jpg (41.29 KB, 640x714, e8sftobwn6121.jpg)

No. 3774[Reply]

While all religion are awful and subjugate women, none is worse then the religion of the Arab pedophile and that is undeniable, so this is a thread to discuss its evils and crimes against everyone but especially the women subjugated under it
368 posts and 86 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 35072

>>17760
She literally went against all of her views just to convert to an extreme misogynistic cult

No. 35073

File: 1728221907389.png (849.53 KB, 1126x594, mentallyill.png)

>>35034
I read about her recently. She turned Islam into her personality in her later years. She attacked Miley Cyrus over wrecking ball because she thought the short hair was a homage to her somehow? and said in a tweet anyone who isn't muslim is mentally ill. I wonder what spurred her from one child abusing genocidal rapist cult to another?

No. 35226

why do women in islamist nations not revolt against being treated like this for so long? Like i know persian women are based for what they are doing but what about the other middle eastern nations that are rich? like qatar, saudi, jordan, kuwait etc why do women there love being a broodmare?
Also they could be one of the biggest pickmes to exist who hate western feminists alot

No. 35229

File: 1728741564141.gif (3.77 KB, 650x220, 650.gif)

>>35034
>>35072
>>35073
Let's not forget Annie Lennox saying "Free Palestine" in her tribute for the Grammy. O'Connor never said shit about other muslim countries (and you know why), why would Annie do that shit besides for views.

No. 35247

>>35226
I want to see you revolting against your father if your father was legally allowed to kill you for disagreeing with him. Your weak femoid body doesn't stand a chance.



File: 1693649531665.jpg (498.31 KB, 1440x1440, IMG_20230902_201502.jpg)

No. 19663[Reply]

Vent about scrotes here! Share your experiences with annoying, terrible, worthless men you've encountered. Post screenshots of men being awful. Talk about how you avoid shitty men and why.

Rules:
-Please do not respond to scrotebait. Taking bait will result in a 3-day ban from /ot/, no appeals.
-No femcel sperging. An example of femcel sperging is 'kill your father to even things out'. Posts in the vein of 'Aileen Wuornos did nothing wrong' 'rapists deserve to die' are allowed.
-No racebaiting as it derails the thread.

Previous thread: >>5125
652 posts and 112 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 35217

>>35215
Moids are collectively sexpests and filled with seetheing over not being laid by the one calling in life to be scientists. Maybe gay moids like Alan Turing are the only valuable ones to science but all these retards who seethe over imaginary women who live rent free in their heads should pick up useless liberal arts degrees instead of turning tech and STEM into bullshit techbro ape hierarchys. If money didn't exist and therefore the acquisition of sex and resources from pickme women, these moids wouldn't pursue STEM period. The evidence for this is laid out clear as day.

Ranking STEM fields by their "uselessness" is already autistic reasoning that ignores the entire purpose of science in favor for the logic of resource hoarding and therefore access to sex from pickme women like in picrel. So much for curiosity for the sake of curiosity and wonder in science kek. Money and sex is the only purpose in life to the moid, no pursuit of passion or curiosity. The real "uselessness" is that males have to have hierarchys to indicate who's the biggest dog who pisses the most and fucks the most females to even function.

No. 35218

>>35215
If they’re ranking their autistic techfaggotry as more useful than any form of biology then they’re retarded coming from a techfaggot

No. 35221

>>35215
Males are generally too selfish to be interested in studying anything Biology or non-human to do with STEM because then they'd have to focus on something vastly greater and more important than themselves.

No. 35225

its really funny why men get mad at people for joking about them going to prison for molestation or something then they start sperging out about how "other men have litawally wost their jobs over jokes wike twose"

No. 35227

>>35221
We all are selfish



File: 1659079085038.jpg (246.67 KB, 800x800, Tumblr_l_502072421667743.jpg)

No. 6232[Reply]

All day every day in radfem, gc, terf, feminist, pinkpill what-have-you spaces you can find the phrase "no hope for women". I've typed it myself. And sometimes it feels good to acknowledge that despair, almost comforting, but in reality it just paralyzes us. Let's talk about what gives us hope instead.

>What gives you hope for women?

>Are there any women who inspire you? Not just feminists or in a feminist way, but admirable women in general
>What do you think should be the next step for the feminist movement?
>Can you think of an action anons could take today to advance the liberation of women, however small?
90 posts and 19 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 14541

>>7039
>also the sad reality is that without actual military support this uprising will fail
That's the unspoken part of this mythology and the most blackpilling point for me, that all of this is actually wanted (where it exists), allowed by the moids.

To clarify, there are two very distinct topics being discussed here.

The first is separatism >>14537
. It is achievable and already exists without the moids in power having directly created it. They tacitly allow it, probably don't care, and I can't see these groups disappearing anytime soon unless they were to be presented as "deviant sects". For me, this is the healthiest, most accessible and achievable way and the one that allows a total separation, even if it could be subject to troonish infiltration attempts.

The second is the gain of influence in the moid society >>6681 , the access to positions of responsibility, the taking of power in the current system. It seems illusory to me. Generally, for a fundamental social change to occur, there has to be an insurrection, or even a revolution. There have been militant women, even feminist fighters, but nothing analogous. All that was allowed and phagocytized by the moids, at least some moids, the wealthy and powerful ones, obviously. However, the internet has really allowed for the emergence of real mass alternative currents created organically, and this is a note of hope. Too bad it can't exist in a country like Iran that has tight control over its intranet.


But until women have the physical, or at least material (guns), capacity to lead an insurgency, this is all mostly wishful thinking. Even if it seems to be materializing in reality, all this is actually very precarious. To take an extreme case, see Afghanistan. I know it's not quite comparable because religion is much more important there, including for women, but the way everything turned around in just a few days blew my mind. Nothing is ever immutable and the greatest empires have collapsed, but our foundations depend entirely on their goodwill, or rather their interests.

No. 18603

Seeing how many women can now stand on their own feet and leave their abusive parents, partners, etc. compared to 20 years or so ago gives me hope. Men are losing their minds over the divorce statistics because they're mad we can finally leave them when we're in unhappy marriages.

No. 18639

The fact that even young girls on TikTok are waking up to the bullshit and rejecting the tranny narrative.

No. 18651

>>18639
Post caps of it! I wanna see but I ain't going on that cursed data stealing app kek

No. 35128

File: 1728323286177.jpg (72.36 KB, 837x179, huh.jpg)

>>10795
This is very enlightening. No wonder the most patriarchal societies run on scam, like India.



File: 1637601354716.jpeg (155.23 KB, 960x983, 1637578079650.jpeg)

No. 3791[Reply]

ITT: Post screenshotted pink-pills specifically relating to troonism, non-binary and genderspecials
125 posts and 60 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 34247

File: 1727038598128.png (271.46 KB, 1866x509, gender ideology hate thread.pn…)


No. 34315

>>33886
>>33888
Strangers are more likely to assume she covered up white power Nazi shit instead of made up boy witch kek

No. 34986

File: 1728019016901.jpg (31.12 KB, 546x145, tumblr_9120b73ab9dda160cc5e66c…)


No. 35053

File: 1728198250338.png (510.53 KB, 1067x2187, lolicons.png)


No. 35055

File: 1728198561402.png (169.01 KB, 1117x699, lolicons_2.png)




File: 1685702385129.jpeg (16.36 KB, 275x244, 1620635678657.jpeg)

No. 15258[Reply]

Manifesto-chan was a lolcow poster who graced us with her keen and accurate insight. Part artist, part scientist and 100% misandrist. Post your favourite manifesto-chan caps here.

Some commonly used manifesto-chan words below if you want to do your own searching.
"false self"
"cuckoldry anxiety"
"mate guarding"
"coercion"
"sales tactics"
"deference"
"artificial niche carving"
"parasitism"
234 posts and 110 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 29107

File: 1722128870180.png (83.01 KB, 1863x251, screenshot.png)


No. 34837

>>20757
> I can't accept womanhood because of the sado masochistic human sexuality that's naturally abusive and women and men make me unconformable with it and the norm is to accept this degrading shit just cause wonen do it

It’s definitely not the norm. NGL anon you have a very polarized view of manhood and womanhood almost on par with incels judging from your post. I don’t deny it exists but it’s not as big as you’re making it out to be. There are tons of neutral spaces that don’t revolve around men or woman giving to men. And there are a lot of people who don’t give into the game of gender roles. You really should stop having such a black and white view of the world because what you’re describing is such a small echelon of what the actual male and female experience is, it’s alarming that you don’t (or can’t) see it. I know heterosexual couples be weird as hell but the real world is not at all like how you’re describing it. The truth is You don’t have to worry about men usurping you if you have proper boundaries and healthy self-esteem, and care about yourself. After that, you’re pretty much impenetrable. Unfortunately some woman choose that life with men. No disrespect but, It shouldn’t be on your radar at all to worry about these things, if you have your shit together.

No. 34857

>>34837
>There are tons of neutral spaces that don’t revolve around men or woman giving to men
Care to recommend any?

>And there are a lot of people who don’t give into the game of gender roles.

Where would one find these women?

No. 35024

>>20757
>women can give birth therefore women are designed to only be broodmares and nothing else

why do people always say this? Especially when women have so much more intellectual and creative potential than males.
It's like saying that because males have their prostate deep inside their assholes the male body is designed for anal rape only and nothing else. Which would make more sense actually seeing how men are all huge faggots who crave cock 24/7.

No. 35228

>>34837
>u have a very polarized view of manhood and womanhood almost on par with incels judging from your post.
That's because a human man and a woman are a polarity and gender in humans is a physical construct and sex is a fundamental part of the reality. We as women have a femininie voice, sexual anatomy and physiognomy and men have a masculine.
>And there are a lot of people who don’t give into the game of gender roles.
Never met real exceptions or sex that was an expectation of the universal rule created by the structure of the physical reality. One woman had a username called littlefitcumslut and talked about how gender non conforming she is.
>what the actual male and female experience is, it’s alarming that you don’t (or can’t) see it
I'm literally basing it all on observations of real human behaviors all around me and everywhere else in the world
>After that, you’re pretty much impenetrable
The female body was made to be penetrated.
You are literally dismissive of facts about real life we experience from the second we are born which is human biology. None of what you wrote changes the fact that as a woman if I had sex I would be a bottom and feminine. The sexual polarity we embody as humans is never changeable and it's a biological femininity(women) and masculinity (men). Dick is or penetrative with it's anatomy therefore it psychologically creates male sexuality and vagina is receptive, it also creates female sexuality mentally and makes them identify with sexual submission and femininity. Even what sex is is universal for everyone and not whatever you make it to be. Even "normal" sexual acts are sadomasochistic and involve deep female vulnerability and a submission which makes her mental state a similar to that of a bdsm sub.



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Search
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]