File: 1569966678132.jpeg (1.24 MB, 3872x2592, 5-Steps-to-Mastering-Customer-…)
No. 11760
Please post all general issues and complaints here. If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.
>>>/meta/6821 should only be used for technical issues and suggestions (can't load site, site slow, bugs, site feature requests). This thread is for non-technical issues.
No. 11767
File: 1570011670237.jpg (466.79 KB, 6538x645, bait collage.jpg)
Is this allowed? Just want to know if it's cool to reply to, & not cool to report. Strikes me as being intentionally unrelated to the cow, like they're trying to derail. (These are all about Onion himself, not Lame.)
No. 11773
>>11772i don't
really think that victimizing lainey is tinfoiling, and if it is, it's not baseless what it is though is wking and OT.
No. 11782
File: 1570147196319.jpeg (900.9 KB, 1242x1797, 911B6070-9A69-489A-A4B5-1F8A14…)
This isn’t mine, but I am confused by the ongoing moderation.
How is this off topic on the Onision thread when they’re talking about Greg not going down on Lainey?
Memes / images like this are frequently shared on there.
Can mods give some clarification on what’s “on topic” when the general conversation seems to be the same?
I am increasingly displeased with this moderation.
No. 11785
>>11784Yes, but the context is that he’s friends with Sarah. Sarah confirmed that Greg doesn’t eat pussy, and the discussion is around Greg eating pussy. Which is a dumb conversation to begin with, but it’s still contextually accurate.
Is connecting the dots too hard for autistic anons?
No. 11788
>>11787>then ban the rest of the people talking about Greg eating pussyYou're strawmanning and that conversation was two threads ago. Plenty of people in the thread have been banned for derailing and infighting all week. The redtext is there to make an example of the milkless twitter caps clogging up the thread.
>>11775I don't think as many posts are reported from there compared to /snow/.
>>11777We can have one if there is enough demand.
>>11772Pretty sure bans have been issued towards whiteknights there.
No. 11795
>>11793>The conversation was very much about vaginas, and eating out because Greg tweeted today about lesbians being better in bed. Nobody at the time was discussing oral, they were discussing tweets. It's literally just a milkless cap of some twitterfag insulting Greg.
Twitter commentary is not milk.>One minute Lainey discussion is entirely banned,Discussion of Lainey was never entirely banned. It was only banned outside of her thread if it didn't have any relation to onision.
>One minute nitpicks with Greg go onNope, nitpicking is banned globally.
>One minute cowtipping is all the rage with multiple anons, and then?Cowtipping is never tolerated. Do you think I control what these monkeys do?
>I want to know your rules, so I don’t break them. Because they change every week.lolcow.farm/rules
No. 11797
>>11796>myself and other anonsadmin can see your IP, you know.
cows on /pt/ aren't there necessarily because they are actively milky 100% of the time, their legacy is what gets them that status. otherwise tuna and fahr wouldn't be there.
No. 11798
>>11797I hope you’re not insinuating that I’m Mariah or one of her lackeys, because I’m not. I’m someone who has been following these threads for a long time and has noticed that they’ve been reduced to infighting and people just saying “something is going to happen!” for such a long time now, and nothing happens. And with threads like Luna yes it’s slow but at least the discussions are steady and relevant.
Another issue too is when anyone brings
valid criticisms of the thread to the table, some anons will immediately jump on you and accuse you of being Mariah or her friends. It’s extremely annoying and unnecessary and makes it so it’s hard to improve the quality of the threads and make adjustments.
No. 11800
>>11796Question, why do you want the thread moved instead of just, I dunno, fucking hiding the thread? Why would a cow with as much legacy and idiocy as moo just get merged in to the fuckin costhot general thread??? You don’t get moved to snow for not having milk 24/7. There’s dryer cows on that thread who haven’t had real drama in a year. I just don’t get what’s your damage and why you’re so concerned about it both in moo’s thread as well as coming to whine on meta
>there’s nothing but infighting>there’s infighting right now Yeah because you brought up this stupid ot sperg in the thread
>me and other anonsWho?? Majority opinion seems to be to keep her there
No. 11808
>>11802I never understood people who kept on screaming "NO MORE MILK STOP TALKING ABOUT HER!!1!"
>>11796 If there's no more milk the thread will die on its own, all you're doing it causing infighting
No. 11816
>>11806I'll only say she doesn't belong in /w/ because she should really get switched back to /pt/ again.
She's a legacy cow who's doing a lot of dumb shit lately. Yet I guess since anons will always have her narc mom to scapegoat even for the shit she does to this day, it probably won't happen.
No. 11821
>>11820those are not in the confirmed milk section so what's the problem, what are staff supposed to do for you exactly? they're not
universally accepted as true, only the Tofu video is - and Taylor acknowledged that one. the germ of a story often leads to the truth with Taylor, as much as the stories might start off sounding far-fetched. there have ben a few I personally thought were bs but turned out to be something.
No. 11830
>>11829i totally disagree with you and the mod who posted that whole huurduur ban thing. the
entire thread and point of the thread is nitpicking.
No. 11832
>>11829Unless she's sperging on IG, cheating her patrons, or being a tard on livestream her thread follows the formula of
>post pics of a recent set or selfie she took >bitch about it for 20 replies I think it's boring.
No. 11834
File: 1570880537348.jpeg (86.82 KB, 1242x501, 34D07E62-137C-483A-AA0F-3DE1EB…)
What rule would a post like pic related break? It said the reason for the ban was unspecified
No. 11839
>>11834political discussion + 'derail'.
If you noticed everybody in that whole conversation chain got a ban.
No. 11842
>>11841But then you might ban all discussion about looks/(subjectively bad) make up altogether (would also drastically affect other threads such as the Luna Slater or TND threads) because it’s just as nitpicky and repetitive.
It‘s still to this day impossible to tell where the line is between legit commentary and nitpick. By the info we’ve been given about what qualifies as nitpick
all candids, posts about anything regarding her weight (including posting fake stats), Dropbox leaks, etc would have to be banned as well because muhh boring body shaming nitpick.
And well, in that case you might as well shut down the thread altogether.
No. 11843
File: 1570984650818.jpeg (819.53 KB, 1241x2274, rip.jpeg)
Can a mod unlock the Hartley Hooligans thread in /snow/?
Lola died and now Gwen will probably get milky since now both potatoes are kill.
No. 11845
File: 1570988435817.png (190.35 KB, 1440x874, 009.png)
To be clear, is merely discussing there being bait in a thread now a bannable offense? We can't even acknowledge that there's a problem in a thread we’re using anymore?
This ban would have actually made sense if I responded to the bait or dragged it out after the troll had already been banned, but neither of those things happened. I reported it, made two entire posts responding to anons who mentioned it being in the thread (and this was while he kept posting without getting banned, not after it was already over), then got back on topic as usual without a hitch. He continued shitting up the thread for quite a while after that, and nobody else replied to him, either.
The rules haven't been changed, they still state responding to bait (not just mentioning that it's there) is what's against the rules, so unless there's something else that wasn't explained, I'm assuming the farmhand behind this was just irritated for whatever reason, went full retard without paying attention to the actual rules of the board, and was too stubborn to fix their mistake in the end.
No. 11846
>>11845A three day ban
does seem a bit heavy-handed for a post like that, did you try appealing that thing?
No. 11851
>>11849By that logic, having a GC/PP thread in general shouldn't be allowed since by simply talking about men or trannies in a negative light, we're "attracting" them and encouraging them. In fact, the site itself is just attracting bad attention by not being a safe space for incels.
The tard would've posted with or without me or anyone else commenting on them. He did it repeatedly, with no encouragement.
Aside from that, it's not and never has been against the rules to say water is wet, or point out someone shitting up a thread. Taking bait would have been actually responding to it.
No. 11854
>>11852Do you have any actual reason for that?
Actually, it doesn't really matter unless you're a mod yourself (in which case, kind of cowardly to not even say it with your chest).
The fact remains: Actual rule-breaking and derailing warrants 3-day or longer bans, not some farmhand getting personally buttblasted. Any non-retarded person who uses this site can agree with that.
No. 11855
>>11843Sure.
>>11845I mean, taking the time out of your day to tinfoil about scrots and homophobe-chan is not only derailing, but still somehow giving them the attention they seek and thus taking the bait to an extent.
Now I'm not saying you're guilty of this because I'm not looking at your post history but sometimes getting slapped with a bait ban is also due to having a history of taking bait or doing it multiple times within a short timeframe.
No. 11857
>>11855I've talked about there being a troll in an /ot/ thread before without any issue or warning, and I see others do the same regularly, so it'd be weird for it now to be a big enough problem to fall under a multiple day ban.
I think if it's something that's being tightened on, the rule about bait should be edited, or they should've actually announced it, like
>>11848 said.
As for the post history thing, I make it a point to report scrotebait and never respond to it, and I can't even remember the last time I got a ban/warning for derailing of any sort. Probably a month ago, at earliest.
No. 11859
>>11842The mods have said before that discussion is fine, derailment when its EXCESSIVE which spergs keep doing is just fucking with the thread. We dont need, like exampled, 50 people saying the same shit. We GET she gets money based off her looks. Comment on it, let it go. The people who keep pushing bad tinfoil about pedo/taxes/animal abuse should be banned. Tinfoil that is unfounded is bannable anyway and we have NO evidence on any of those things in any thread and the dog thing was dozens ago and doesn't need to be brought up and picking up a dog and it yelping isn't the same as someone strangling a dog ffs. Moo just mishandled a dog while picking it up without asking. Not animal abused, just being a cunt.
As far as the tit shit goes, We get it. They saggy. You dont need to bitch about it 'NOT NORMAL'. Its fucking normal. Shut up. There are millions of bodies in the world. There isn't a set look for tits, you austic and she has had procedures? Whats there to really go on about? Point it out or let somene point it out and end the discussion. It doesn't need to be parroted 4837 times and 'lol those tits' isn't milk.
And at this point anyone not saging in the thread and isn't giving milk needs to be banned. Im so tired of these anons coming in with 'LOL look at her massive size' and not saging anything.
The fact that OP twice, with the shit threads, actually cropped out that a mod said to not nitpick her tits or instant ban is annoying. That needs to go back in the thread header.
No. 11865
File: 1571071872911.jpg (56.84 KB, 756x404, titspergs.JPG)
>>11842>It‘s still to this day impossible to tell where the line is between legit commentary and nitpick. Well, let me spell it out for you. If Momo was, for example, making fun of other girls for having saggy tits and calling her own perky and gravity-defying, then it would probably be funny if people pointed out how much her tits sag. Because the conflict comes from Momo's intense self-deception that aggressively clashes with reality and maliciousness towards other girls. But she doesn't do that as far as we know, so pointing out for the nth time how her tits sag is boring and nitpicky as it doesn't really have anything to do with the state of affairs. It's just finding fault for the sake of having something to bitch about, which lowers the quality of the discussion. When Momo was bullshitting people about working out and drinking fit tea when her weight loss was actually due to getting liposuction done, it was appropriate to point out how lumpy and unbalanced her stomach looked because she was lying to people about a product she was endorsing and the nonexistent effort she put into improving herself. If she was open about it from the beginning, it would be much less interesting to point her Donkey Kong body out because there's no deception behind it.
Most cows are interesting because they were caught lying or having delusions of grandiosity, both traits which Momo had during the first 40 threads or so. Dropbox leaks were not a bannable offense because they pointed out how she was scamming her patreons with low quality costumes she was given thousands of dollars to produce. Again, the milk comes from the deception. Fake stats, lying again. Candids, they're also funny because they showcased how effortless her costume was and how much she edited her photos to falsify reality.
Anons like in the pic related are there just to shit up the thread quality, you can see how they're big perpetrators of infighting as well. It happens with all tinfoiling, someone starts with the "omfg I bet she rapes kids too you know how she lewded that loli dragon once!!!" sperging again and they're immediately there screeching "hi momo" when you tell them to calm down. You can tell they're there just to look for conflict and attention at any cost.
No. 11871
>>11870NTA-
but why does it need explaining? We already know, it's been said a million times, how many zoom-ins to parts of her body do we need to see?
How many detailed accounts of all the ways we already KNOW she messed up her breasts/body do we need?
We all know why she looks the way she does.
No. 11874
>>11868I'll increase moderation until newfags are weeded out.
>>11869That's called reading the rules. No matter how plainly the rules are stated retards will still refuse to read them.
Report cowtipping immediately, it ranges between a 1 week ban and a permaban.
>>11870I applaud your passion for defending such insightful commentary. Nitpicking is still against the rules.
>it doesn't reduce the quality of the thread, which is trueI needed this laugh, thanks.
No. 11875
File: 1571098513108.png (780.79 KB, 619x973, bianca.png)
>>11868>>11874On the topic of the egirl thread, whoever made the thread included a picture of Bianca Devins in the image op, who is the girl that was brutally murdered on instagram a few months back. She was murdered 7/14 and the thread was created 9/10. I guess it isn't breaking any rules but it does seem supremely fucked up and unnecessary.
No. 11881
>>11875Who cares? She's not even discussed in
that thread.
>>11878Yeah, that's true. One person's trash is another person's trashy time.
No. 11886
>>11885
>this meme againNot her but how many times are you going to repeat that? The infighting is from scrotes who invade and the mods letting it happen. Also, antifeminists who want to attack lesbians and defend their Nigels.
The Pink Pill thread was fine on its own and so was gender critical. It made no sense to force them together.
I know I may not even be talking to an actual woman, but I'm so tired of this shitty
victim blaming response whenever we try to get actual moderation
No. 11887
>>11886And you think the scrotes came because the thread was merged? If anything it's easier to get rid of them since they gravitate to only one thread now instead of two but I guess mods not being online 24/7 to clean up your shit thread warrants constant whining about how you're being unfairly treated and how you're a "
victim" topkek
No. 11888
>>11887
>REEEEE stop whining why should mods ever do their jobs???You sound so dumb. As a matter of fact newfag it wasn't even close to this bad when the threads were separate. Maybe because the mods were actually competent back then but no, it totally makes sense to bitch and moan about how it's our fault whenever we try to actually get counsel on this
You don't even like the threads so how about you stop sticking your fat nose in whenever people who do use them try to reach the admin? This isn't your thread
No. 11891
>>11890Yeah, screeching like a bitter pterodactyl whenever anyone says anything about a thread you're eternally mad about and don't even use isn't
valid and no one really cares to hear it. It's not even really a complaint. It's just you bitching out of salt
No. 11895
File: 1571209761893.jpeg (62.33 KB, 500x281, serveimage2.jpeg)
Can we get a mod to see if it's one imageposter/samefag that's posting the Braco spam?
No. 11896
>>11895*in /ot/
Just to clarify
No. 11913
>>11912Very funny that you complain and encourage for pink-pill to be banned while doing your very best to start shit in that thread.
Pink-pill isn't going anywhere. They can have their thread given that they behave, you on the other hand have not.
No. 11920
File: 1571404708140.jpg (20.43 KB, 468x286, article-1340274-019169F9000005…)
>>11913Wow, I think a lot of us speculated people would post bait in the PP/GC thread to get it banned but it's hilarious they even came to meta to say mods should ban the thread lmao.
Thank you, based admin.
No. 11921
>>11918Are you complaining about a ban you received 8 weeks ago?
> the responses was quoting lainey and greg. so we take the word of cows at face value now. This is one of the reasons the onion thread is cancer. It's just something that comes with the influx of twitter sjws.
>. then we have the posters who pretend to be mods. Do you mean minimodding?
>sage needs to be on all boardsSage is on all boards.
>4. ok someone bumped the thread to see if anyone has milk. the mods should delete some of these 2 word post.How do I even respond to this?
No. 11929
>>11928We barely get any reports from there - next time you see such behavior, please report the posters.
It is impossible for the farmhands to try and manually manage all the posts that go up on this site. We rely a lot on posts being reported.
No. 11932
>>11881>Who cares? She's not even discussed in that thread. ….the multiple people complaining about it and reporting it care, clearly. What kind of logic is this? You have literal proof of people caring in front of you. If I wanted to see a murdered girl getting trashed I'd go to 4chan.
>Rule #5: Don’t post about wishing bodily harm on a subject or group. (a-logging)How does multiple people saying someone deserved the extreme "bodily harm" they got not clearly fall under this category? The girl is dead and people are still wishing bodily harm on her.
>>11879>I mean she was an e-girl, no?No, at the time this thread was posted she was not an e-girl because she was dead. She is no longer in the e-girl category, she is in the murder
victim category.
No. 11936
>>11921i know i will be banned for this but im the op. admin, are you a woman. you seem to be as lolzy as the regular posters.
i complained about a ban from weeks ago because i just saw it.
yeah, i think im too old for this site now. i will see my way out.
No. 11938
okay, we were supposed to complain here about bans and shit, right? alright, the mods ban way too much in the Onision thread. like way, way too much, over dumbass stupid reasons.
also, build an autosage feature or whatever. just a little checkbox you can tick that when its a major update, you click that shit, when its not, boom the thread don't get bumped
you guys seriously need to do something about these banhappy triggered mods, because the shit is getting silly now. or hell, has been silly for years.
ok. thats it. there i said it here.
No. 11941
>>11939firstly, why get angry over me suggesting a handy feature? second, if you have this neato feature why not use it and why ban people for "not saging"?
I have commented on this many a times before, you people don't seem to understand what sage actually is.
>>11940again, whats with the hostility? why are you people being so defensive?
No. 11943
>>11942you are confusing the type of autosage i mean with the little anchor thing, you really have no idea how to run a chan, do you?
I could built the feature I'm recommending in for you in 15 minutes flat, but hey, im a dirty male right?
keep up your spergin', its hilarious.
GIRL POWER!
No. 11945
File: 1571608153974.jpg (32.56 KB, 614x520, Image1.jpg)
>>11944aww so angry that you can't budde-ban me after all these years still. say how is that user-agent thing working out for you?
hmmmmm delicious!
GIRL POWER!
No. 11947
Imagine being too fucking stupid to know lolcow was founded by a male who did all those features you complain about kek
>>11945Yeah like changing your useragent is going to hide you're the same autistic kiwifag who unironically uses vivaldi.
Keep entertaining us.
No. 11952
>>11941My God shut the fuck up. You do know saging is when you aren't delivering milk, right? Thats how that works you dumbass.
You have an opinion - SAGE
Lolzy fanart/meme - SAGE
Correcting an anon because you disagree - SAGE
Anything at all that is being posted by the topic of the thread - NOT SAGE -POTENTIAL MILK
Someone commenting on Twitter/Insta/YouTube about said topic, but not adding anything new besides a 'burn' - SAGE
Unless you have milk, everything you post should be saged anon, so fucking do it and stop bitching about your bans. Maybe learn how this site works and how saging and threads work.
No. 11953
>>11948i'm not the raging scrot, i just want to get it out of the way first bc i know some anons will blame me for it. farmhands will see i'm not, that's what matters, but:
there's something fucky going on for sure. i'm an old user, i've been on here for several years. something changed and i don't think the mod team/admin realize that they're killing the board. i don't agree with the "too many bans reeee" crowd but idk, the board seems deader every single day, i feel like the actions being taken are keeping people from participating rather than encouraging better engagement.
i think the team's focus should be on keeping the board alive and on its course, not kill it so that they have less to do.
No. 11956
File: 1571638781469.png (42.44 KB, 1910x152, jesus.png)
hey mods, can you ban whoever keeps screenshotting and posting my name on the usagi/kelly boards? I know her irl and it's irritating being called a selfposter when why the actual fuck would I. I don't want to have to go dark on social media just because this of this fuckhead.
I left comments on their stuff but for actual fucks sake I did not post it here.
tl;dr vendetta chan is smearing my good shitposting name.
No. 11957
>>11948I think it’s mostly because there’s some careless moderation. I feel like bans are thrown left and right for things that aren’t stated explicitly in the rules / hypocrisy for one thread over another, and then when something bad is happening it’s totally disregarded.
Lolcow will continue to die as long as moderation isn’t done properly.
No. 11960
>>11956What the fuck, I was was the anon in your screenshot and I have no idea who the hell you are irl, jesus christ. There were multiple people calling out horrorgami for cowtipping across Lori's thread and Kelly's thread. I have no fucking clue where you got the assumption that the few people calling it out are the same person who has it out for you.
Also, the majority of people were calling you out for cowtipping, not selfposting.
No. 11961
>>11960am horrorgami.
I'm not talking about you specifically, the original anon who is posting my screenshots in the kelly and lori thread. they DMed me on instagram right before posting it here, which is why I knew to check here,
i know them irl (i think) and they've been following me on throwaway accounts.
it isn't cowtipping, it's me interacting outside lolcow. this board's rules dont apply to my life outside of it. it's considered cowtipping because it's posted here. it's not that hard to understand.
I'm asking mods to delete the screenshots from vendetta-chan because she's only doing it to fuck with me. I don't like being doxxed and called a cunt for no reason.
tl;dr I was being facetious to lori and kelly in my own time, gets posted here, suddenly cowtipping. that's not how it works and I honestly expected better from you guys.
I was being pretty cunty to kelly/lori but i've know about both of them/interacted for years regardless of these boards so I dunno what to tell you besides stÖp
No. 11962
>>11960also anon who i screenshotted in
>>11956 was literally to refer to you telling me to post here, not calling you vendetta-chan. sorry for the confusion.
No. 11964
File: 1571688284832.png (2.17 MB, 1678x1630, LORIYOUFUCKEDUP.png)
>>11962>>11961vendetta chan is lori, screenshots as proof. think that's pretty notable. have DM screenshots if you need more evidence.
feels good man.
No. 11966
File: 1571802523154.png (1.27 MB, 3552x1886, eye tee tee.png)
I can't believe I'm actually posting an annoying long post but I came back after a month long break like I usually do and missed the thread merge drama, but thanks mods. Im supposed to share a thread with pink pillers when I want to talk about GC stuff and radfem stuff.
When women wanted to vent about tranny buffoonery they went to the GC thread.
When women wanted to talk about beauty culture, our pornified society, religion, and sex work they went to the radfem thread (that they ASKED FOR in the town hall).
When women wanted to complain about men, either for valid reasons or for femcel schizo reasons they went to pink pill. And now these 3 very different subsects of women; feminist or not are supposed to share a SINGLE THREAD and NOT infight? What the fuck were you thinking? Pic related. One of these things is not like the other.
I do not expect the admin or farmhands to understand or care about why these 3 different groups need their own threads but we do. There is going to be friction in GC when it comes to being CRITICAL about GENDER, even when it doesn't have to do with troon hate (lots of anons seem to think GC = Troon Hate exclusively) There are going to be disagreements in the radfem thread about all sorts of shit, or political lesbianism, or having a boyfriend, or whatever. But it's an imageboard, we should be allowed to duke it out with each other. I hope I can say that most of us can handle it. I am totally fine with bans being given when someone derails a conversation that has nothing to do with feminism/gender crit ideology however I do not understand why we are being punished because some mods might take personal offence to what we believe. I don't understand why it's necessary to overpolice these SPECIFIC threads for "infighting" when what you're really talking about is just discussion in the classic vitriolic imageboard way.
You don't want politics shitting up boards (even OFF TOPIC)? Ok, give us a /pol/. You can even have your own "go back to /pol/" memes. You don't want a /pol/? fine. Let us have the GC and radfem threads back. They were popular and successful threads even if you personally don't agree with them. People can't handle hiding 3 threads every couple of weeks? You tell people to integrate with board culture but you can't even use basic imageboard functions?
You tell us that we can go to "another site" to express this stuff. Where exactly? On tumblr you get banned. On twitter you get banned. In Britain you can be arrested for misgendering. 4chan is a male dominated board. Mumsnet is a site for mothers with young child and they should not be expected to bear this cross.
Give use back GC and radfem. Or merge GC and radfem general but do not insist that we share a thread with PP.
No. 11967
File: 1571835232228.jpg (100.46 KB, 800x679, lhtb0byg26l01.jpg)
>>11966this has to be a troll post
No. 11969
>>11966I can't believe I'm actually posting an annoying long post but I came back after a month long break like I usually do and missed the thread merge drama, but thanks mods. Im supposed to share a thread with pink pillers when I want to talk about GC stuff and radfem stuff.
When women wanted to vent about tranny buffoonery they went to the GC thread.
When women wanted to talk about beauty culture, our pornified society, religion, and sex work they went to the radfem thread (that they ASKED FOR in the town hall).
When women wanted to complain about men, either for
valid reasons or for femcel schizo reasons they went to pink pill. And now these 3 very different subsects of women; feminist or not are supposed to share a SINGLE THREAD and NOT infight? What the fuck were you thinking? Pic related. One of these things is not like the other.
I do not expect the admin or farmhands to understand or care about why these 3 different groups need their own threads but we do. There is going to be friction in GC when it comes to being CRITICAL about GENDER, even when it doesn't have to do with troon hate (lots of anons seem to think GC = Troon Hate exclusively) There are going to be disagreements in the radfem thread about all sorts of shit, or political lesbianism, or having a boyfriend, or whatever. But it's an imageboard, we should be allowed to duke it out with each other. I hope I can say that most of us can handle it. I am totally fine with bans being given when someone derails a conversation that has nothing to do with feminism/gender crit ideology however I do not understand why we are being punished because some mods might take personal offence to what we believe. I don't understand why it's necessary to overpolice these SPECIFIC threads for "infighting" when what you're really talking about is just discussion in the classic vitriolic imageboard way.
You don't want politics shitting up boards (even OFF TOPIC)? Ok, give us a /pol/. You can even have your own "go back to /pol/" memes. You don't want a /pol/? fine. Let us have the GC and radfem threads back. They were popular and successful threads even if you personally don't agree with them. People can't handle hiding 3 threads every couple of weeks? You tell people to integrate with board culture but you can't even use basic imageboard functions?
You tell us that we can go to "another site" to express this stuff. Where exactly? On tumblr you get banned. On twitter you get banned. In Britain you can be arrested for misgendering. 4chan is a male dominated board. Mumsnet is a site for mothers with young child and they should not be expected to bear this cross.
Give use back GC and radfem. Or merge GC and radfem general but do not insist that we share a thread with PP.
No. 11970
>>11967Hard agree.
>>11966 anon sounds almost sane, nothing like a genuine gc/pp/rf martyr.
No. 11976
>>11975It's murderers. What difference does it make if it's a kid? I knew at the age of 9 that killing isn't okay, what makes that kid exempt of justice?
Seriously, you're fucking retarded.
No. 11978
>>11973>>11974>>11976I just want to respectfully point out, for the record, that this just proves my other post
>>11966We're supposed to share a thread with these retards.
No. 11980
>>11969While I agree that the three are only vaguely related and should be treated as separate topics and therefore get their own thread each, I also kinda get why it’s been done.
Especially radfem bullshit has bled through all boards and topics and femcels started tone policing the stupidest shit in various threads across all boards. They need to be kept at bay and LC is not meant to specifically attract that kind of audience (or at least that’s what I got from Admin‘s/Farmhands‘ statements so far).
No. 11988
>>11986Cool! Thanks for the info and for your hard work.
How many unique visitors does lolcow get? I'm curious to know how many farmers there are
No. 11990
>>11966At least one of the posts in the “radfem” section was classic cringy libfem sperging if you read the context (attacking another woman → bait/switch to accuse that same person of actually attacking women to appear self-righteous), and one that you put in “radfem” while another you put in “pink pill” are obviously by the exact same poster.
That chart is awful and just makes us look autistic, anon.
No. 11991
>>11981There's a festering nest of anachans here, partly in the anachan general and I think maybe in an /ot/ thread about meals also? They like to pretend to talk about "milky" skellys and get big mad at the fatty fake anachans. There are a smaller number of "normal" posters in there I'm sure (I'm one) but the general atmosphere of hunger is palpable.
There does tend to be a lot of sperging around FAs no matter what, they're a fun topic but it does attract the judgy types, the weightloss bloggers and also the hungry types looking for motivation to not eat. It's an interesting idea that one of the regular anachans might have made the thread… I wonder? I go to bth threads but I just find the extreme eaters to be interesting at bth ends of the spectrum. Also the FAs are staring to have real social impact now which makes them a shitty and dangerous movement.
No. 12009
Are the farmhands watching the Soft Girl/DDLG thread? The name fagging is rampant rn. It's either Erin herself pretending to be various people and not knowing how the site works - or she's sending her followers out to shit up the thread. Can we find out if it's all the same person? It's really suspicious.
>>12008Agreeing with this anon, ya'll are embarrassing. The majority of this site gives two shits about this.
No. 12014
>>12011people like you who don't think GC is the same idea as PP stuff are idiots. no one in the old GC thread was doing anything other than bitching about dangerous males. just because you guys think your opinion is more grounded in science doesn't mean the general user finds it different. no one could even discuss things (like saying that it's possible some of the people are
victims) in the GC thread without people reeeing about hating men.
No. 12015
>>12014You know transmen and NB were discussed often in GC too right? these people are trans too and discussing them was fairly common.
GC and PP aren't the same, discussing gender-related themes and the likes isn't the same as specifically man-hating, this proves you don't even know which were the themes discussed in that thread, you just go for an easy "Nah, is all man-hating".
>like saying that it's possible some of the people are victimsMost trannies whether male or female did all of this out of a fetish/pornsickness (see fujos/sissies), unless they're minors/extremely mentally ill/ gay people you shouldn't feel pity for them especially when they're using harmful stereotypes as costumes.
No. 12020
>>12018Yep that's basically my thought too, as I stated in
>>12007, because admin has been kind enough to respond to my inquiries on this matter. Although I was responding to
>>12005 so maybe they're the reeeeetard. I don't really participate in the gender/sexuality discussions but I would definitely feel uncomfortable here if those accusations were true. That's all.
No. 12021
File: 1572102099977.gif (506.89 KB, 500x361, retardalert.gif)
>>12005How many rounds of this shit do we need? We are at round four or five of tinfoiling about "mods r trannies cuz they don't agree w me".
The original admin was a MAN. Ever since then, all mod teams have been exclusively biological women for that reason.
Pic very related.
No. 12026
File: 1572112084838.jpg (34.81 KB, 400x635, 73079397_2730394773646842_8865…)
>>12005Jesus, this again?
No. 12030
>>12017>>12020>>12023>>12029>EVERYONE IS A REEEEETARD EXCEPT FOR ME ALSO ALL THE MODS ARE AGPS MASTUTBATING TO EVERY WORD WE POST AND ADMIN IS ENABLING IT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENah you are a paranoid fucking
freak and so are all the other radfems [on this site]
No. 12036
>>12033>/g/ is for all things girly, bathroom talk for advice, lifestyle, fashion, cosmetics, makeup, periodtalk. Anything you would ask and talk about with your female friends. all those other things are off topic. like i dont care what some idiot in /snow/ thinks of sex workers and dd/lg has to say personally about kinks, so stick it in the off topic board. i wish more anons went into vent to let out their personal gripes about cows so it doesnt crap up the main thread. it makes sense.
/g/ makes sense for advice. a lot of anons ask about relationships or their vagainas or acne or whatever. its not off topic. and frankly, i would rather ask /g/ users about my vagina over the users on /ot/ who, lets be real, never leave it and they begin to rage that i should dump my bf and kill him because i got worried about my pussy or some acne or whatever.
No. 12037
File: 1572136034274.gif (137.51 KB, 300x565, source.gif)
Like this anon >> 12023 said, the possibility that mods are trannies or not it's unverifiable, rads/meta anons should remain neutral and accept both possibilities that the team is all women/there are trannies since both sides have no evidence to backup their statements. Also, meta anons shouldn't just expect others to believe everything mods say blindly, radfags screeching "mods are trans!!!" are annoying but "mods are women cause they said so >:T" is not a compelling reason to mitigate that "tranny mod" theory as "mods are all women" isn't a certain truth since no one can prove it…unless you all bring evidence. You all here just keep repeating "mods are women because they said so" over and over with no evidence in hopes everyone believes it, with verifications no one can prove them happened ("mods said so" doesn't count). If mods are in fact women you shouldn't be SO pressed over people merely mentioning that "trannie mods" theory especially when you can't disprove that yourself.
No. 12038
>>12016Well in first place i don't know why the fakeboi and transwomen thread are separated imo they should be merged since its just general cringe with no political implication
>but you might not like them because they won't be a huge exclusive circlejerkYou all should stop with these weak ass ad-hominems they're getting stale.
No. 12046
>>12006posting this wouldve got you a warning in the past. there are too many no personality bored people on the site now. thats why there is no milk. in the past someone who knew a cow would post but you people ran them off. now the site is grammar homebodies.
>>12007 >>12010
i wrote 12005. I didnt know this topic was already addressed. lol. im glad im not the only one who noticed. I had to stop posting milk on a few of them. everytime i posted something I got bashed. even if you dont want the milk how do you bash it. I also stopped posting venus and onision history for the same reason. their fans/haters are trying to rewrite history. but there are other sites with the full history so Ive decided to quit responding over here. i initially got upset when my- my digital escape- milk was treated poorly.
>>12020Im 12005 and I wrote that in regards to gatekeeping. someone is allowed to bash anyone that doesnt agree with trans issues. as far as fighting this gender war I think everyone need to take up some trade classes. you all need to find jobs.
>>12021if people can feel the shift then to say they are imagining it is lame. some of those threads arent milky but devoted to defending the trans cows. come on. just like venus stop defending everything. just state your facts.
I wont be responding anymore.
>>12029its so obvious. I think after being called out the trans has kinda backed off but for almost a year you couldnt criticize at all. everyone felt it and the threads started to suffer because they ran a lot of people away.
No. 12049
>>12048At this point the anon's angry about this shit could've made their own forum to discuss this shit.
So much time wasted shouting at people who don't give a fuck and aren't going to change it.
No. 12053
>>12037This is probably the most logical response but I've verified myself as a female with a timestamp. I'm too wary to mod or even give janitor privileges to randos because if they're not trannies they can also be cows or overly involved farmers. Because of this most of the mods are my close irl friends and any janitors have limited board privileges, even after being verified.
The only issue with this tinfoil is that it's always been a possibility with any board or forum. It's only referenced here because gc anons are still scorned about losing their thread.
There's a reason the same 2-3 anons come here within the span of days to make more tranny janny accusations.
No. 12057
File: 1572298756972.jpeg (61.04 KB, 637x184, EABCF858-113F-4D12-BA4F-E7CC8D…)
There hasn’t been any racebaiting after first warning. There is meat sperging but if discourse is lockable offense then just nuke all of /ot/
No. 12058
>>12057Prob about the whole "eating any animal is the same" argument since it was related to an Anon saying Asians eat dogs
Would it be alright to remake the thread or whatever and just put the rules at the top/ban specific subreddits from being mentioned??
No. 12060
>>12057Any discourse about race is banned in /ot/, yet anons continue to discuss which races eat which animals.
The thread was just infighting with no discussion of the actual topic at hand.
No. 12063
>>12062Any discussion of race, racebait or not is prohibited in /ot/.
You would know that if you read the sticky.
No. 12065
>>12064Those are two tinfoil posts, and they belong in the tinfoil thread.
Just because you don't like the opinion shared doesn't mean it doesn't belong, especially since it's not even weird racebait or anything like that.
I think the Pizzagate stuff is retarded, but guess what? I ignore it, because the thread itself is for conspiracy theories and tinfoils. Grow up.
No. 12066
>>12065>They belong in the tinfoil thread.No they don't. You guys are supposed to keep that shit in your containment thread.
>>12064Remember to report radfem derailing outside the pinkpill thread when you see it, even on /ot/.
No. 12072
>>12069Honest question, do you even read posts before replying? I'm not a radfem, I've literally been annoyed and reported their autism. I even said that in the very first sentence of my post.
If you need someone to bitch at, try the actual GC spergs who've been trying to get the threads unmerged above.
You don't look any less autistic than them by mindlessly screaming at anyone who doesn't praise every single action the farmhands take. You just look like a hivemind sperg.
No. 12074
>>12073You say that, but then post shit like
>>12069?
It's a no from me. Take your own advice pls.
No. 12081
>>12067lol one of the mods is always in here sperging about radfems. I was last here 2 weeks ago, same thing. Then before that. If you disagree with the mod stance you're a radfem. No matter what. It's prob the tranny mod. Seeing terven everywhere lmao
>>12069dilate
Anyway have you guys considered that not all the women sperging about gender issues and trannys are radfems? Or even gender critical? But good luck. Keep banning everyone for the slightest reasons. Your site is thriving.
No. 12084
>>12080I haven't been following the thread closely but I'm confused as to why the sister's IG had been redacted? Was she a minor? When I caught a glimpse of her IG before the link was taken down it looked like no minor to me..
But the pictures of the kids definitely need a blur or censor over them or something. It's not their fault their birthmother is a deluded psycho.
No. 12086
>>12085This is what I mean. I'm not even the person you're freaking out at.
You sound mentally ill, get some fresh air.
No. 12099
>>12098It actually seems to be one of the GC spergs stirring the pot again, not a real tranny. I'll give warning bans to the idiots who took that obvious bait.
>inb4 t. tranny mod>>12094Yeah we can crack down on the pet sperging in there.
No. 12101
>>12097not at all, so i’m aware that fuck all will ever be done about the dumpster fire status of half the threads in /pt, especially mira’s when it’s very obvious that it
is the same handful of people posting. anything admin does would probably just aggravate the spergs anyway. like an anon above me said the criteria is all fucked anyway.
No. 12103
>>12100/pt/ isn't about activity. you should look at it as a kind of hall of fame for cows. basically, a cow does something so stupid/funny/fucked up that they get moved to /pt/ and stay there because they've proven themselves to be an unredeemable idiot.
a lot of super active /snow/ threads are full of nitpicking, infighting, minimodding and hardly anything interesting going on.
also i'm sure it'd be a shit ton of work to constantly move people back and forth to /pt/ and /snow/ based on the thread activity not to mention it'd be confusing for us as users as well.
momokun is still on /pt/ despite her thread content being /snow/ level of retarded nitpicking but she's proven herself to be a super idiot. what anons need to learn how to do is to let cows die out. if they don't do interesting or funny shit anymore then just don't post about them. constantly ranting about how their nasolabial folds and boobs sag or whatever just attracts unhinged people from PULL with insecurity issues who then make the whole board feel more hostile and crazy than it was before.
No. 12105
File: 1572797076885.png (59.77 KB, 648x247, Screen Shot 10.png)
>>12103>you should look at it as a kind of hall of fame for cowsRight, but I'm saying this makes zero sense. A "Hall of Fame" implies a purely archival sense, not an active one. You don't go to the Baseball Hall of Fame and go "
well he retired 20 years ago but we're still waiting for him to set some new Baseball records so we can talk about it", which is what you're implying /pt/ is for. Besides isn't that what /cream/ was supposed to be for?
>a cow does something so stupid/funny/fucked up that they get moved to /pt/ and stay there because they've proven themselves to be an unredeemable idiotThat's literally the requirement of creating a thread for any cow in the first place, or have you never read the rules? You're making it sounds like /snow/ is some triage board where people are given a chance to redeem themselves and if they're a lost cause then they move to /pt/, like it's hospice care or something. If they're not an unredeemable idiot in the first place they wouldn't warrant 5+ threads? Dolly Mattel is on thread #42 in /snow/, how many threads does she get to prove that she may still be redeemable? 100? The Game Grumps threads date back to 2015 (how I found lolcow in the first place), how does that not count as a "Hall of Fame"?
No. 12106
>>12080>>12104The rules on minors are
>Do not make threads on subjects under the age of 16.>Do not post identifiable information on minors such as full names, addresses and schools.>Do not post photos of minors where there is an expectation of privacy. So it should be fine to post pics that merely include them from time to time as long as you don't post pics of them that were supposed to be private or start sperging specifically about them ala the onion anons.
>>12084Her sister's IG may have been redacted because posting family members who are unrelated to the dramu is against the rules.
No. 12109
File: 1572813040801.png (11.89 KB, 547x109, rules.png)
>>12107>the standard set of rules is like what? almost 5 years old now?>you can't take them so literallyYou really can't read huh bud. They're not an ancient out of date dusty tome, they're literally updated all the time. If they aren't meant to be taken at face value then how can they be enforced?
>no but /snow/ is for threads where cows have to prove themselves consistently milky enoughRight, so explain to me how a cow that's on their 42nd thread hasn't proven themselves "consistently milky enough", but Fahr Sindram who hasn't produced enough milk for one full thread in 4 years has? Explain why Lillee Jean got upgraded to /pt/ on her 3rd thread, but Jillian Vessey is on her #34th in /w/? Explain why Jessica Yaniv didn't have to go through /snow/ at all? You can't just say those are the rules when they're not actually followed in any case. There's just no rhyme or reason to any of it.
>why even care? shits the way it isBecause it makes the website worse, and it doesn't have to be? /snow/ and /w/ are so overrun with the same ~5 cows on their 20+ thread constantly being shoved to the front that none of the hundred other threads get any breathing room. /pt/ is nothing but breathing room because it's just a graveyard for Greg and Momo threads and cows from 5+ years ago that are just tumbleweeds at this point. I don't know where you "constantly moving threads back and forth" from, I'm literally talking about a handful of dead threads that have been stagnant for years trading places with a handful of threads that are bursting at the seams. /snow/ and /w/ are breaking fire codes and overflowing with milk, and /pt/ is an empty club with a bouncer turning everyone away for not being hot enough but letting boring uggos and old women stay in there for years only ordering water
No. 12125
>>12124lmao what
Why would a catalog-like thread about cows be in /ot/?
No. 12127
>>12122anon I'm not complaining about who's on what board, perhaps you meant another comment
>>12124Do you mean the Personal Cows thread?
No. 12145
>>12100
>Why do /pt/ cows get permanent tenure long after their milk has dried upQualifying as a /pt/ level cow is not a bell that can be unrung.
One of the prime qualities of a /pt/ level cow is that they will return with prime milk after months or even years, and the milk is usually an entirely new drama. Fahr is a good example.
>>12109
>Right, so explain to me how a cow that's on their 42nd thread hasn't proven themselves "consistently milky enough"Are you deliberately being obtuse?
Full threads and high activity are not a measure of milk. The number of threads and the activity level of a thread is determined simply by the number of posts.
Look at the The Laur and Lillee Jean thread. It was moved to /p/ after only a few threads and only a few months because of the quality of the milk and the quality of the. The farmers in that thread stay on topic, avoid nitpicking, have dug deep into their milky pasts, and bring the receipts.
>>12103This. The current Raven thread is a good example of farmers exercising restraint in nitpicking and ignoring her until she reemerged. I didn't even finish posting the transcript of her last farewell video, and I stopped posting about the changes she kept making to her accounts because it became an obvious game to her.
No. 12157
Now the DDLG girls turned a thread about them into a thread solely focused on Erin
>>>/snow/891485 . Don't get me wrong, Erin deserves to be mocked, but they're just salty she's copying other ddlg girls as if the entire "community" wasn't a complete cringe fest.
They're only three posts in and the thread has already been shoved to the front by some brainlet who doesn't know how to sage. Pls put it on autosage.
No. 12171
>>12166I think Erin's interesting as a subject, I do love a catfish. but it's so fucking retarded how her threads are being handled:
thread 1 ~ locked by staff till anons could prove she's milky
>>>/snow/849255thread 2 ~ e-girls thread
>>>/snow/866800e-girls in thread decide "muh thread quality" would improve if Erin was moved to her own thread, thread is now wall to wall newfaggotry
thread 3 ~ Soft Girl/Ddlg/Nymphets general really just a vehicle for Erin at time of its creation, op is a retard "someone had to do it!" aka the cry of the newfag
>>>/snow/879341ddlgfags in thread decide "muh thread quality" would improve if Erin was moved to her own thread, now they can nitpick each other's bodies in peace uwu
thread 4 ~ second standalone thread for Erin instead of requesting
>>>/snow/849255 unlocked. the cycle of Erin autism continues
No. 12172
I know staff have policed this in the past but can we have a bit of fresh scrutiny of newfag Onision threads? The main offender being threads where they don't update the milk at all but just copy-paste the whole lot, change 1 link and the thread number/title and call it done
This new one is bad
>>>/pt/728877I've written up the milk for them here to try and fix the problem
>>>/pt/728931They think having a thread at all hours of the day is more important than documenting the milk
a la the tempfags. Onision threads have a bit more happening right now with Chris Hansen involved and documentation is important.
No. 12176
>>12171I disagree that
>>>/snow/849255 should have been unlocked. The current milk isn't current, it has her old usernames, the picture sucks, it doesn’t contain her more recent shenanigans
I’m not sure if that was your thread or something since you keep linking to it
No. 12181
>>12179Thirding, there needs to be some intense banning in there to teach the newfags how to integrate. They are running wild, I posted
>>12166 and they somehow made the thread even worse, I'm fucking astounded. It's the worse I've ever seen a thread, personally. I hope farmhands/admin address the situation at the very least.
No. 12189
We need a mod to add into.Moos description, since dumbass snons keep removing it, that the mids have already stated that nitpicking needs to stop for the following and that it was instant bans:
Pedosperg, tit nitpicking (color, veins, medfagging about them, sagginess), medfagging in general, taxsperg, weightsperging, animal abuse
Like fuck. The unsaging anons wont sage. We never even got a mod to address the unsaging.
No. 12216
>>12213I am crying too, I thought saging posts wouldn't hurt a thread but why did I get a red text for this:
>>>/pt/723678??? I am pretty sure you can just hide saged posts, and I see no point in redtexting it much later, I thought admin agreed that it was weird too.
>>12210and too shit.
Also, why is moo's thread 100% just nitpicking now and when I make an awkward post it gets redtexted? I mean at least I saged.
No. 12221
>>11760can something be done about the "TND Rape Debate"? People can't prove or disprove it and it has nothing to do with anything going on.
Plus it's kind of gross, not like Taylor (to my knowledge) brought up her rape & even if she did, again, we can't disprove or prove it.
No. 12223
>>12220>>12221>>12222Can we just get a hellweek? It seems like a bunch of threads could use it and it might dial back the newfags that don't want to integrate.
Or maybe a cough from admin to let us know that she's still alive?
No. 12239
File: 1574525366774.jpg (219.75 KB, 800x1149, 20191123_080905.jpg)
Does anyone know why this happens?
No. 12250
>>12248I'm starting to wonder if it's actually the sisters themselves coming here and insisting their thread is all selfposting or samefagging hoping that they can get it banned that way.
They're probably not smart enough for that though
No. 12251
>>12250That's a really great tinfoil. If they wrote something of any length, they'd be pretty easy to spot.
>>12247 is a little ESL for something so short, but it's not purple enough to be the girls. It'll be entertaining to internally tinfoil over this for many comments to come, though.
No. 12261
>>12246Seriously. PT threads should probably have active mods just for that board, not managing other boards. PT is always active with something a lot of the time and the amount of unsaging is so irritating at this point and we aren't even allowed to tell people to sage if they dont know because then its mini modding. Like wtf are we supposed to do then when nothing is being done about them? Mods aren't even addressing it in threads.
I dont get why we dont just autosage PT again or just remove saging in there all together so we dont have to worry about this shit again. WHY was it even stopped? Makes no sense.
No. 12262
>>12261Yeah it feels like there’s no moderation atm whatsoever.
As others have already mentioned, the Moo and Onision threads are especially bad with all the unsaged bullshit and newfags.
+1 vote for a christmas hellweek
No. 12263
>>12262Agreed. Staff has stepped in twice in the past week in the Onision thread which is better than before which was not doing so for a month or so. They were pretty active when Sarahgate happened and it would be nice if they were active on pt again. The amount of newfags willing to sage and trying to make moral stands on a site like this is fucking crazy. There was an autistic argument yesterday over someone saying that they saged when they didn't and refused to believe that they didn't sage.
Tuna has a ton of artfags clogging up up the thread. Laur and Lillee's thread clearly has new people who just want a place to vent (understandable) but lurk more or integrate. Lack of sage is all over pt. I'm not going to pretend like I didn't slip up and act retarded, but these threads are getting so much worse when many people are acting like it.
No. 12264
>>12262>>12263Christmas hellweek has my vote as well.
Pt is ripe with newfaggotry. In the onision thread people don't sage their shit, no integration and there's derailing over pronouns and other things.
Not saying nothing's been done but this is just exhausting.
No. 12267
>>12253Another vote for Christmas hellweek here.
/snow/ and /w/ are just being destroyed by newfags who won't listen and won't integrate. Board culture is slipping away, it feels like. They treat this place like they are leaving a comment on Instagram or YouTube, it's so annoying. Keep board culture alive, please.
No. 12280
>>12276It's already being planned out along with the yearly cow awards.
>>12263There are constantly bans in that thread. The only issue is the high newfag turnover rate at the moment.
If there is a particular post or something going on, report it instead of complaining here if you want us to see it faster. We've been noticing a decline in reports and it makes things harder on our end.
No. 12308
>>12301sincere question but why do you guys give a fuck? especially if you'd rather have no sage at all? what about not saging
triggers you this much?
No. 12310
>>12308I'm curious about this too. Why does sageing mater
that much to where there are
multiple posts about it
every day shitting up
most threads?
Besides the obvious reason of bumping the thread or not, who fucking cares.
I guess it depends on how you prefer to navigate the site because if you just bookmark the threads and check them periodically it doesn't matter if a thread is bumped but if you navigate using the respective front pages of each board too see which threads are active it would matter. I hope that makes sense. The endless mini-modding is tiresome as fuck tho
The real aswer is that it's ~board culture~ and you should be ~in the know~ and it makes people feel good about themselves to be justified in shitting on someone tho
No. 12313
File: 1575183694679.jpg (46.94 KB, 512x512, 5e9df687bfcfff0dc67445f137950a…)
There's another wave of tit sperging going on in the Momokun thread.
How many times do people need to say that she has breast reduction scars? How many times do they have to say her tits are saggy? How many times do they have to point out that they're discolored? How many times do they have to say one is bigger than the other?
This is so tiresome. Every possible thing there is to be said about her stupid boobs has been said at least forty times.
No. 12316
>>12310Some people like to navigate the board by using the ‘hide saged posts’ function to only see important posts that are somewhat milky or relevant.
Posts like this for example:
>>>/pt/735038>>>/pt/735292>>>/pt/735379>>>/pt/735811aren’t relevant. They don’t add anything of value. So for someone who chooses to hide saged posts, it’s a huge pain in the ass when they STILL have to navigated through heaps of bullshit like that.
Posting things that bump the threads are meant for shit that’s relevant to anyone following the thread. Your personal opinion isn’t important enough that it needs to be seen by everyone.
Plus, it’s annoying af to see a thread being bumped, thinking there’s new milk and it’s just some dumbass being too stubborn or new to integrate properly.
Plus everything
>>12312 said.
No. 12317
>>12312kek i am most definitely not a newfag and have probably been around a lot longer than you so simmer down a bit. this still doesn't explain why you'd rather revert back to /pt/ having absolutely no sage at all? same with
>>12316how does that make sense?
honestly in my experience it's always the people who have been here 6 months/a year who bitch about le newfags sage ree and you guys are way more annoying and still newfags as well
No. 12319
>>12317No one genuinely suggested to get rid of sage. Are you actually autistic?
We‘re saying that because of the amount of unsaged posts and how little there seems to be done about it, it‘s almost as if sage doesn’t exist in the first place. It’s hyperbolic ffs.
No. 12320
>>12319Uh
>>12303 ?
How would anyone know that's supposed to be hyperbolic when we did have sage taken away on /pt/? Or are you too new to know about that one?
No. 12325
>>12312Ayrt and you proved my point. I do integrate and I do sage, it's really not hard, now if you could get off your pedestal and quit sperging up every thread with sAaaAAgE we could all enjoy ourselves
>>12316That's what I suspected re: navigation. Personally I think this site needs a new design but I know everyone will freak the fuck reeeeeing about that idea because we need to look exactly like 4chan or something. Also it truly does weed out annoying people who can't figure the site out and who will give up and leave. Honestly it's for the best whenever I think on it. The sage faggots keep out a good portion of newfags kek a decent trade-off
No. 12329
>>12325ABSOLUTELY and newfags like
>>12325 can bitch aboit it all they want. The site isnt made to suit you. Its how its rules state. Sage or stfu in threads.
No. 12333
>>12319>autisticof course they are, they say kek unironically.
in my opinion board rules should be put exactly in peoples faces, if you want newfags to stop
triggering you, then you should urge the admins to make the rules more visible to them.
No. 12341
>>12339Board culture? Have you ever even been on an image board besides lolcow and maybe cc?
It really doesnt matter wether they sage or not when lolcow is as slow as it is and literally no one uses the hide saged posts feature. All this bitching is pointless. Crack down on the sage sperg minimodding 2020
No. 12342
>>11760Dear admins and farmhands,
Can we please ban people who use the word
nonny to refer to an anon? It almost reads like namefagging to me and I suspect it’s one or two of the same people who do this.
This would be the best Christmas present ever. Thank you for your consideration.
No. 12343
>>12341There would be significantly less minimodding if there was more, you know,
actual modding.
No. 12345
>>12339I absolutely agree, and it's not just a problem in Greg's threads or /pt/, it's everywhere.
Do I remember wrong or were people actually banned for not saging some time ago? Now you can go as ot as you want, nobody gives a shit.
It's just annoying af, if you don't sage a retarded post that doesn't add anything to the general conversation, then this only serves to show just how important you think your 'opinion' is. Sometimes threads read more like chats, with everybody just quickly typing short answers, without bothering to sage or to learn how to reply to others properly.
No. 12349
>>12344lmao I knew there was some retard gonna reee the usual nOt AlL bAnS aRe ReDtExTeD!!!
Yes, I did consider this. But it’s way too obvious that it’s the same few people. And I doubt that all of them are ban evading. Plus, the sheer amount of people in this very thread mentioning the lack of moderation (especially on /pt/ and /ot/) and crying for another hellweek should show that it’s not just a lack of redtext.
Well, let’s hope the new janitors might fix the issue, but looking at the last few posts in that thread make me doubt it.
No. 12352
>>12349Most of your post history is you telling other people to sage and coming here to complain about sage.
I don't even know how to respond to this. You're literally the problem.
There is also no lack of moderation as reports have been taken care of quickly despite of the holidays. You're literally just pissed because of sage.
Let me tell you why sage bans aren't redtexted; I tell my mods not to redtext minor ban offenses.
By the way, typing like tHiS shows a clear lack of integration, this is not instagram or twitter. Sage is not a big deal on chans and I'm not going to penalize people over it as long as they're contributing. Sage bans basically always apply to some newfag or idiot who treats the board like a chatroom.
No. 12359
>>12358>>12356Ntayrt but I'm confused. What does deleting, integration, and lurking have to do with
>>12355 's comment about admin
>trying to criticize part of anon's shitposting? What am I missing here?
No. 12379
>>12377I was just about to mention this kek. They called the mods "dikes" and trannies, then complained that his ban was too short (while ban evading.) Autism is a hell of a drug.
It always makes for a good laugh when some sped comes into the Moo thread and announces that they're a guy.
No. 12386
>>12383The fundamental issue is that all the cows and flakes involved read the thread, day and night. They're going to shill their younow streams, they're going to use the site to their own benefit, they're going to post their Reddit tinfoils and new exclusive onision drama videos. They're going to proudly display their cringey edits as well.
I don't feel that there is anything to fix that onision is probably one of the most tipped cows alongside chrischan. The damage has already been done.
>>12385What specifically needs to be edited into the OP?
>>12381Report. It's faster than meta but I see my mods got to it earlier.
No. 12388
>>12383The Onion thread is basically a newfag containment thread at this point lmao
Greg is to LCF what CWC is to Kiwifarms. It's how people find out about the site, so it's plagued with newfaggotry and people making the same jokes/observations/tinfoil they've been making for years.
No. 12393
File: 1575884019125.png (108.7 KB, 500x393, D427043B-C8AA-4B2D-B482-2C8303…)
Hey cool guys
Just saying hey. Everyone want to complain but I’m smiling.
No. 12395
>>12394The onison thread is descending into a faggot-riddled hellscape.
Send help, mods
No. 12398
>>12397Some dumbass sperged in the Moo thread about a surgery she’s never had and it had nothing to do with the cow but I got hit with the ban hammer for telling them it was off topic for “derailing”. Amazing. Shouldn’t mods be the one telling people shit is off topic and irrelevant so we don’t have to?
If farmhands put half the effort they do
trigger happy banning people into the onion thread as they do the other threads maybe it wouldn’t be such cancer. I dunno why some threads seem to be moderated so well while others are so so bad
No. 12400
>>12397You got banned for minimodding about nitpicking instead of reporting. Not for nitpicking! Hope that clears things up for you.
>>12398We don't really see all that many reports from the Onision thread lately. It would help us get to things a lot quicker if you could report the posts that violate the rules.
No. 12401
File: 1575944970898.jpeg (66.96 KB, 640x640, 4B79E089-8F2F-46F5-AA09-ED2DB8…)
>>12394>>12395Hold on longer anons. Bitches come and go. Newfags will weed themselves out. Everyone here is qt
No. 12407
Requesting a farmhand's help to edit or fix an OP. I created it not realizing that I had mixed up a cow's internet handle with one of their
victims.
Their
victim came forward to correct my mistake and request it be removed from the OP. The username is Sertraline_Bee.
>>>/snow/904231 No. 12411
File: 1576090217417.jpg (193.81 KB, 989x840, IMG_20191211_194651.jpg)
>>12409I already reported it a day ago, they don't care.
Why was this poster banned? She wrote what the linked article is about, so…? Out of all the posts in the kpop thread this is what you have a problem with?
No. 12415
>>12414I kinda think it's stevie too since he made a pissy tweet also
>>>/snow/904673I've been reporting them since they started commenting.
No. 12422
>>12417Yes,there was one last year as well.
>>12411This is an imageboard, what don't you understand?
>>12408We can deduce it if we examine things hard enough. Are you still having issues?
>>12420If it was reported it was probably already taken care of. If this is still happening then report the posts and thread OP.
>>12421Nitpicking is against the rules but to be fair most cows look rough around this time of the year.
No. 12424
Hey so about Admin comment at
>>>/pt/740816 and my 24hr ban. Thanks for lifting the ban.
Those previous points I left in in the section at the bottom of the milk are some key things from the last two-three threads - they don't have to be there though. I've done the same thing in Taylor's threads at times too.
Why this went from zero to full salt and 24hr ban when a warning about the /pt/ OP direction and content you wanted would have worked- I don’t know. I’m not new, I'm neither of the original/recent 'good' OPs from the Onision or Taylor threads but those anons seem to be gone a the moment so I'm trying to give a hand. I will always defer to someone who's going to make a better one. I have 2-3 live OPs here at the moment and if you think they're cancer you need only say. I can read warnings.
No. 12433
>>12432>>12431I 4th it. Also, don't forget the Idol spam threads and Kpop General threads. Lock all of it so it doesn't fester to other boards.
I'm surprised we managed to get this far tbh when we originally had the Anti-Korean thread and the autism was subdued in the beginning with the Kpop Critical threads. You would think news of crime / trafficking and suicide would still be front and center but koreafags are so desensitized that they don't give a fuck anymore. All good things come to an end.
No. 12438
>>12433The k-pop spergs need their own board. Finding threads in /m/ is almost impossible because it's so full of k-pop.
And before someone tells me to use the catalog, I can't because it crashes my browser.
No. 12444
>>12440Nta but I've had trouble with the catalogs for as long as I can remember and using lite mode works, thanks for the heads up! I never had trouble with other parts of the site so I never considered using it.
Will I miss out on any posts or threads at all if I remain in lite mode? Sorry for the retard-level question.
No. 12448
>>12441I feel like if you keep Kcrit (or kpop related threads), you should keep it on autosage. If it's not at the top of the page all of the time, it will be harder to find and not attract as many newfags. But honestly,
>>12442 is also a
valid option at this point.
No. 12450
>>12441>gendercrit/radfem/pinkpill 2.0Lmao as much as I want to see the fallout, I rather you have to ban them all b/c any semblance of serious discussion will be drowned out by photos.
Or just ban everything except the Kcrit thread. That's how it was in the beginning. Maybe keep it on autosage like what
>>12448 said.
The spam threads attracted more people to this site to make it like /kgp/ 2.0
No. 12460
>>12451I disagree the idol spam threads and kcrit threads attract and encourage the kpop autists the most imo. Spam for obvious reasons and kcrit because it is one of the completely anonymous places they can simultaneously wk their faves and shit on everyone else, which would be fine if they integrated but they don't.
Sage or lock it all.
No. 12509
>>12441Yes.
If man hate/feminism/gendercrit has to have a single containment thread, then kpop trash should, too.
>>12450Lmao I don't even know why they're here in the first place when literally every other site on the internet has a place for kpop autists. They can suck on a lemon if they don't want to share a thread.
No. 12527
>>12507Bless you, Admin. You are going to spoil us, this will be glorious milk! Thank you! I was coming here to meta to ask about this exact thing. Erin is already going crazy on twitter rn because of her thread, I can't even imagine what will happen after this.
Merry Christmas Admin-sama, Farmhands, Janitors, and fellow anons!
No. 12530
File: 1577104898472.jpeg (90.36 KB, 1031x632, 23D4D189-F617-4D2B-A8B9-757030…)
>>12507Not even follow those threads but you a G
No. 12571
>>12569No anon, it's what
>>12568 said
Only britfags would be aware of whatever you said lol
No. 12576
>>12571it started in gravy's thread though and they say
nonny in australia too.
No. 12578
File: 1577344760549.jpeg (55.66 KB, 525x525, ABEFADEA-03E4-488E-9A57-5AC5F8…)
>>12507We didn’t receive our Christmas gift.
No. 12580
File: 1577347275567.jpg (7.25 KB, 198x254, DXE-2VZXkAEMlOJ.jpg)
>>12579my body is ready bless u
No. 12596
>>12568It literally comes from British anons using fail fandom anon on LJ and DW a decade ago. Everyone started saying
nonny then, and if someone here uses it it's probably a sure bet they came from there.
No. 12636
>>12631>>12630I see you're very bored. Thanks mods for unban.
I'm here to ask what happened to the reveals.
No. 12649
>>12645>Sets stopped being released anyway too.They haven’t tho?
I’m not disagreeing with your actual point about those rules being added etc. But the last few sets have been released. They just get taken down extremely fast lately.
No. 12658
>>12657And I think there may be some same fagging from someone
triggered (or syd
triggered) some name fagger is talking shit. The thread is a mess rn.
No. 12660
>>12658no one is
triggered by the namefag. namefagging is against the rules, apparently you don't know them?
No. 12662
>>12657Yep! Between all of the TND twitter morons who post screenshots of their own twitter accounts, the self posting, and cringe fest.. my once favorite thread has turned into an Onision thread in a lot of ways.
You know it’s got to be a collection of Emzotic, Bree, Jonny, Taylor, and Taylor’s little fans.
It’s just a mess.
And there’s a namefag in here going off like a crazy stalker about Syd.
Would love if our fellow farmhands could expose any of it.
No. 12673
>>12667You went off and then wished the staff a good new year's eve while asking for gifts. It makes you look a little crazy, anon.
>>12672Honestly, that thread is all over the place and might need a lengthy clean up. The only thing that's going to cure that is a hellweek and it seems like a lot of work for that thread alone. It kind of reminds me of Shay's thread.
No. 12674
>>12672why would people attack the girl that got pregnant instead of the 2 people that we know for a fact are both assholes?
if and when syd becomes relevant (being pregnant doesn't actually make her relevant to anyone BUT taylor) then yeah, by all means go off, but people in the thread are talking crazy on taylor's behalf. like anons saying she's going to hurt the baby are reaching. sorry but the amount of stans trying to spin the thread in taylor's favor right now is ott. taylor wants that thread gone but if she can't have that she'll have stans flood the shit out of it, which is what's going on both there and here.
inb4 syd wk, who cares about her? other than taylor?
No. 12695
>>12694Happy holidays, based admin!
I was surprised to see 2X, because it seemed like the kind of thing that would attract new radfems to LC in general. (Obviously from context, I wasn't a fan of radfem posters in the gossip forums.) If it doesn't do that, there's no problem. If it becomes an imageboard for women (radfem or otherwise) to discuss politics, that'll be amazing. There's no space like that online afaik. If it stays purely radfem and gc but doesn't negatively affect the rest of lc, that's also cool. Sorry to ramble.
No. 12704
>>12701>>12700>>12699honestly, please get rid of 2x AND pinkpill. they all need to go and stay go. lolcow is for fucking internet drama, not femcel politics. go make a new imageboard for that instead of forcing it onto this one.
>>12703kill yourself
No. 12706
>>12705Back on the "everyone who says something I don't like is a scrote" bullshit. This is why we don't want you people here. Containment boards do not work, they only make things worse.
Admin, I can't believe what a fucking retard you are.
No. 12722
>>12720"Reeeing about troons" is straight up
academic compared to zooming in on some bitch's vagina and crying about garbage boyfriends over and over.
>implying twitter autists aren't the newfagsOh it's bait
No. 12724
I'm going to lock the /ot/ threads for 7 days. Pink Pill and Gender Crit anons will have to post in /2X/ for the meantime. I will do whatever the polls here reflect a week from now. You guys can view the results as anons vote so we can see the overall judgment in our community. VOTE HERE.
Raven's confirmed posts thus far will be posted today along with Erin Painter's. Two anti-Os have been outted earlier as well. More mystery outtings will occur for the remainder of this week so keep an eye out for further announcements. I'm working on labeling everything so it's easier to read through but I'm having some technical issues with that so the raw pages will be posted for now instead
No. 12727
>>12726I'm just saying, you must see the irony in taking issue with radfems calling every anon who disagrees with them a scrot while saying all anons who talk about the /ot/ brand politics must be twitter radfems.
But beyond that, just make it an issue of moderation. Farmhands have already been purging people who post politics outside of the designated containment threads. Beyond that I don't see why it's so hard to just report and hide.
No. 12729
>>12724after doing the survey i realize the issue is your personal feelings towards the site. it's a drama site, nothing more. we don't need to grow it just like kiwifarms shouldn't grow into something else. it's also ridiculous that you're not allowing any kind of politically charged threads other than the p.p/gc stuff but have the gall to claim that lolcow doesn't pander to anyone's ideology. people love to act like /ot/ is separate from the rest of the site, but it has drama threads and catty bitching just as much as the other boards. many people claim to only use /ot/ and act pretentious about it, but they are the outsiders. people like
>>12719 are hypocrites who minimize anyone who disagrees with them being here. it's not insane that i am more okay with associating myself with a drama site than one known for radfems. and i am someone who used to post in g.c for a period of time.
No. 12733
>>12729>it's not insane that i am more okay with associating myself with a drama site than one known for radfems.You shouldn't be "associating yourself" with an anonymous imageboard at all, anon. That's really embarrassing, and goes against the most basic, integral point of any anonymous site.
Lolcow started off as a revival of Stamina Rose, and even SR had its own "/b/" culture and multiple threads for unrelated discussion in the midst of all the drama threads. That's just the nature of things. Most users won't always want to talk about someone's nasolabial folds, and we don't all feel as comfortable on social media.
If you want the drama and the drama only, the solution is to ignore /ot/, /g/ and /m/, and instead stick to /pt/, /snow/ and /w/.
No. 12734
>>12730>>12731Can't wait for Erin to have all her posts tagged.
>>12733Exactly, the whole point of anon boards is for it to be…. anonymous. If you don't tell everyone in your life that you post here they won't know or judge you for others users' posts, simple as.
No. 12741
>>12724idc where the threads are as long as they arent banned. a million thanks for the selfposters milk ♥
>>12729problem is you sound like a dumb bitch
No. 12744
>>12724Just wanna say that you're starting the new year off with so much milk and it's much appreciated.
>>12730This. Just sit back and enjoy.
No. 12745
>>12740>2X is a great ideawhat a joke
one 22x user has been samefagging hard in here
No. 12748
>>12694I like /2X/ a lot and I hope it stays. I don't think there's any reason to hide it or keep it unlisted. I'm tired of the threads in /ot/ getting consolidated. Some people might say the board has the potential to bring trolls, but so do the threads when existing in /ot/ and so does the vast majority of the content on this website anyway.
As for everyone who's insisting including /2X/ is a bad idea because lolcow is a drama forum, half of the lulziest cows are trans. Instead of having the cows' threads fill up with gender critical discourse in lieu of milk, /2X/ creates a consolidated place to discuss it.
I don't see any downside to the board's continued existence. For those that don't want to participate in political discussion, /2X/ functions as a containment board. For those who want more nuanced discussion and more threads, /2X/ acts as a haven.
And for what it's worth, perhaps lolcow didn't intentionally start as a women's imageboard but it certainly turned into one and I don't see anything wrong with embracing that.
No. 12750
>>12699I'm
>>12695 and I'm confused. You think we're making lc cater to
us by
not personally being radfem? Where were you the past year? Or did you get the idea I was radfem from my post somehow? Not to infight, mostly just to clarify what I meant if possible.
No. 12763
>>12724I also voted, but please for the love of god no posterIDs, that will make namefags and tripcoders and attention seekers stay her longer. They are the worse.
Also, I hope this is safe from botting. This is a serious decision.
>>12760It's really strange to me, it would make sense to keep 2x hidden and rhe rest pp and gc threads gone on /ot/ the vitriol against it is so strange. But i wuldn't be suprised when I see lurkers from other boards bragging about manipulating certain discusion when it comes to female topics. Very strange.
No. 12765
samefag>>12763
>>12694I really liked 2x because it was a place to slow down on spergging, it was calm and less drama with everyone having their own thread. I would prefer to keep it hidden to decrease traffic. Also I know some people may ask for access but if they don't know it at this point they shouldn't be given it in threads because if people consistently post it the serg prevention will be useless. Maybe a temp/perma ban for offenders?
As much as I want the site to grow I don't think it should get any bigger than 2x, because then it will become like other imageboards/websites with too many bad actors at play and put the entire site in jeopardy (ex: various chans and k
wfarms) and put too much work on Admin (and the rest of staff). Also, if someone else were to take over, they might have a specific agenda to push. But then again, I trust Admin for when the time comes to give that power to someone that would be fair and partial like she has been.
Anyways, thanks Admin and the staff for taking the time to do this and everything else about the board for us. You all do it because you cared enough to take time out of your day to do so and we really appreciate it.
No. 12770
File: 1578250433866.png (168.18 KB, 1305x295, r9k.PNG)
>>12768sure. see pic related. worse yet when anons are punished for being wary and called paranoid when posters literally talk like this:
>>12704 >>12700
No. 12777
>>12724/2X/ is nice. I think its a good way to appease both sides, though there will always be people who will be unhappy no matter what admin does.
People act like if they nuke all female politically charged discussion, it's just going to make it all go away or discourage trolling when it'll probably just "infect" the other threads worse. Might as well try to contain it and people can hide/ignore it if they don't like it. It's really not that hard to ignore discussion you don't care about or hate.
No. 12779
>>12775Agreed.
Admin should've added a page on the poll where it asks which board you frequent the most and if you answer /ot/ or /2x/ it automatically burns your vote kek. We all know those newfags are the only ones who camp out in /meta/ 24/7 and vote on these polls and no matter how big of a chunk of le userbase they make up now, their opinions on this issue don't matter. I say get rid of them regardless of the results, it's for the best.
No. 12781
can admin or a farmhand
please go into the moo thread to clarify what is bannable. anons keep sperging about everything being bannable posts and saying admin herself said it was when she didn't. we need some clear regulation on that because right now people are claiming everything they don't like should be banned. i know admin said she didn't like certain things but afaik body nitpick, titsperg and fat comments are the only posts that are banned.
>>12780hopefully admin will get rid of it if they don't stop. they're still doing it in /ot/ and getting bans at least.
No. 12782
>>12781I was about to come and address that because Im the anon who added it in. All of the bannable listed items have been mentioned by a mod at one point in the Moo threads. It is doing jack shit to keep the drailing, newfags, people pretending to be Moo, tax season coming up and we know how those fucking spergs are, from fucking up the thread as is. Its turns into a jackoff fest as to who has the worst 'shes so fat' variation and repeated nitpicking about her tits. Now, like Onion's thread, we have to have a fucking list in OP to keep dumbasses from doing shit and the mods are probably tired of having to go into that hellhole ad restate every thing they've said is bannable.
If you havent been here for the tax, animal abuse, pedo.. etc posts from the mods, then welcome to the Moo thread, newfag.
No. 12785
>>12784The admins have clarified in actual Moo threads about all of these different ticks. I forgot armchair, tbh, but figured that'd fall under medfagging as a whole with her ADHD and people assuming cushings. And the tax stuff, pedo, animal abuse, 'i cant tell you who I am but i know some secret stuff about the group'..
This isn't just about this thread have anons with issues about it and waiting for a mod to say something ITT. They have stated this shit in actual threads. These things have been problems as they've had countless derailment issues where a mod has to step in and actually say to stop derailing into these topics. We've had warnings about what is and isn't on topic for Moo threads already. You can go through the threads and verify each one. Reposting is 'old milk' which seemed easier to just put up there because across the board anons have issues with this and Moo especially because people find sets randomly all the time and go on spamming as if this site hasn't seen them before.
No. 12791
>>12724It won't let me vote unless I "sign in" but I vote for keeping a pinkpill/etc thread on OT. I don't really care about 2X, I'd rather topics were more messy in one place like on OT.
Expanding lolcow: no
I like /w separate due to my affinity for weebcows.
No. 12798
>>12797no shit, but the derailing got so bad that it had to be controlled by admin herself. stop trying to minimize my points. ffs you guys jump through so many hoops to pretend that the radfem/gc/pp/manhate posters are all pwecious angles that never hurt anyone.
off-topic but why isn't there an option to nuke /ot/ entirely on that survey? all the users on /ot/ are entitled whiny blogposters anyway. i used to use it to shoot the shit but this pinkpill/gc crap has shat it up over the last few years. i really have less issue with the content and more with the posters, and i used to post in our
misandry threads!
No. 12807
>>127482X is a degenerate shithole of transphobic and self-loathing misogynists. It can fuck off to reddit, honestly.
>>12803"you literally have the entire rest of the internet to shit on evil terfs. relax. we only get this one tiny thing."
Uh…transphobes, including TERFs, have like the entire world and internet to shit on transpeople. I think your view of the world is fairly convoluted lmfao.
No. 12808
>>12807I'm not even siding with the radfems but you are cringe
go back to tumblr, honestly
No. 12811
>>12809Yes! I do not usually comment on this site but I was thinking this too!
I have spent a lifetime being a passionate feminist and I'm sorry, I can't care anymore about the majority of trans women, who are easy to avoid or ignore both online and irl. There are many more ugly or butch and old cis women than trans in this world. I was around the first time this conversation appeared, and it is sad to see dialogue regress and become reactionary rather than evolve past the gender theory of the last century or even the last decade.
I think many young women on this site do not know how many unconventional looking cis women end up disavowing womanhood and identifying as gender queer because society has gotten so obsessed and mistrustful about who counts as a woman that everyone, even the modern lesbian community, rejects us uglies, oldies, and butches. I have seen with several young women I know that the trans are at least initially more welcoming and less scrutinizing or demanding than many feminist spaces too. Are we going to blame the gender queer people, many of whom have been through the same exclusion, for welcoming women who are struggling and making them feel included? We are forgetting the real problem lies in society's strict and regressive standards. Have we lost the ability to look at ourselves and society and see how powerful men's influence over the nature of womanhood still thrives? Are we going to pretend our own trashing and policing does not drive other women away? Many of us uglies, oldies, and butches are made to feel so unwelcome and like we don't count any more as women but no one cares about us because we're not pretty or feminine. I really feel the concept of sisterhood doesn't exist today and has just become a marketable, fake-empowered word used to sell diet products on social media. No wonder so many young women feel disenfranchised - I know I often have.
But I'm a boring oldie who is only here because I worry about what my nieces are encountering on social media. So what do I know.
No. 12814
I voted for the threads in /ot/ as I haven’t used /2X/ thus far. After thinking about it for a while, I would also be fine with /2X/ (perhaps even as a general female politics board as suggested before), but I don’t think it should be hidden. Otherwise it would be too slow and restricted to a small audience only. I also agree with
>>12721. Those topics make lolcow unique outside of drama/gossip and are part of the board culture. Both gender critical and pink pill ideas have become constitutive of lolcow somewhat and it won’t help to ignore them, even though some farmers itt sperg about lolcow being a "drama website" only. And no, I am not even following pink pill ideology. But I can ignore/hide posts or not engage with the posters, and so do you. It is baffling how sensitive the spergs in this discussion are. It is an anonymous image board, don’t let it hurt your fee fees that much.
also top kek about anons like
>>12716 worrying about the reputation of the site and associating themselves with it. The newfaggotry is real.
No. 12816
>>12814>but I don’t think it should be hidden. Otherwise it would be too slow and restricted to a small audience only.topkek.
Not sure if stupid or bait. But I laughed.
No. 12821
>>12816I didn’t mean to say that the percentage of gc & pp users is small though. But I think the existence of /2X/ hasn’t reached everyone yet and if it is hidden, new users don’t really have the chance to participate. I have never been a fan of hidden boards, but that might just be my opinion. It also shouldn’t be hidden because as mentioned in
>>12814, it is part of the board culture. The vote will show if that impression is right.
>>12817It makes sense as the poll also asks about integrating /w/ back into /snow/ and other changes like that. I agree that it should be also advertised on /ot/ though as the threads were/are there.
No. 12822
>>12821Do you read the thread though?
>new users don’t really have the chance to participateThat’s the fucking point. The point of 2X is not to lure in even more radfems, but to give them their echo chamber to avoid their bullshit bleeding through all other boards and threads.
No. 12829
>>12826After temp isn't "a long time" but they have been around for too long. /ot/ went to shit as soon as they started and now the whole site is.
This isn't a newfag thing and exclusively lurking /ot/ and the tranny threads in /snow/ for a year and a half doesn't make you an oldfag, dumb cunt.
No. 12831
>>12829this. the older misandry threads were way different than the ones in the past 2 years or so. the group of users that use these threads are the problem, not the threads themselves. /ot/ was so anons could take a break from drama, but now people brag that it's the only board they use.
>>12826the misandry threads and the people using them were less insane acting before. my issue now with users who use those is they act like the site owes them, it doesn't.
No. 12834
File: 1578361047416.png (56.24 KB, 957x657, unknown.png)
Just noticed /2X/ was recently added to this part. Won't this muddy the results? A lot of people voted on /2X/ already from the jump, and probably won't take a second look at the survey to edit their responses and vote again.
What happens if the majority votes to keep /2X/ as a board, but it gets the least votes in the board scheme poll?
No. 12842
File: 1578421775249.png (232.8 KB, 765x649, gotmilk.png)
Can we just nuke the eGirls thread once and for all? or at the very least put it on auto-sage or move it to /w/ or something? It constantly gets necro'd by newfags who are just blatantly egirls themselves there to self-post or beg for vendetta milk. I've never seen such a mess of a thread before and not one of them will learn how to sage or integrate.
No. 12848
>>12833>>12847This is interesting, because I see both of your points here. What scares me is comments like
>>12839 >this site should be apoliticalbecause I feel like 4chan and 8chan probably considered their "anything goes, everyone gets a say" policy to be "apolitical" at one point, and I worry that that will open the door to people whose opinions are in fact dangerous and harmful (dangerous in the escalation to real world physical violence sense such as Pizzagate sense). I think "apolitical" isn't really a concept that can exist these days. Maybe 5+ years ago, but not currently, because not taking a stance is in fact a stance in most scenarios.
I want to believe what anon said "we aren’t a bunch of aggro fueled men", but I also don't see how everyone immediately calling anyone who disagrees with them or presents a different opinion "retard, cunt, faggot, tranny" etc doesn't fall into that camp. It almost feels like if we just banned that type of aggressive and unnecessary name calling it would solve a lot of the problems. Regardless of wether or not you think you personally should be able to use the phrases, they're just are objectively loaded phrases in today's climate and immediately add a level of aggression and venom to any comment.
No. 12850
>>12847>I hate the “they’re gonna be radicalized uwu” argument because we aren’t a bunch of aggro fueled men.Well, 'containment boards/tags/subreddits/whatever' absolutely don't work because they give the radical group a base of operation with which to organize, and which is available to vulnerable non-radicals with a single click. This can affect women and girls too- although it wasn't intended to be a 'containment' case, one of the big reasons that liberal feminism and queer theory blew up is because teen girls were getting radicalized on tumblr.
This is why I support 2X tbh
No. 12855
>>12848What you're suggesting is the opposite of apolitical. I'd rather be called a retard faggot til the end of time. What? You think misgendering is
literal murder too?
>opinions are in fact dangerous and harmful (dangerous in the escalation to real world physical violence…)Women can't relate. How about using your fucking brain and NOT killing people irl because some imageboard said so lmao let's not pretend that SJWs aren't condoning violence against evil TERFs (women), but I guess that's not ~dangerous radicalization~.
No. 12857
>>12849the phrase 'climate change' applied to speech makes me nauseous.
>>12848opinions are not harmful, ever.
>people whose opinions are in fact dangerous and harmful (dangerous in the escalation to real world physical violence sense such as Pizzagate sense)honest question, what are you trying to say with that greentext? if there's a point there i'm missing it.
No. 12858
File: 1578453302209.png (40.45 KB, 1226x80, loaded.png)
>>12855>What you're suggesting is the opposite of apolitical.….yes, that's literally my point? Did you read my post at all? I literally said
>I think "apolitical" isn't really a concept that can exist these daysI'm saying it's impossible to be apolitical so keep the politics and cut the aggression. The aggression is what's turning those threads into dumpster fires. Just take away the unnecessary knives everyone's immediately trying to throw at each other constantly and it can be an actual conversation.
>What? You think misgendering is literal murder too?This is so wildly unrelated to anything I said in my original post that I'm genuinely worried you never learned how to read correctly. How do you possibly get "misgendering is literal murder" from "tranny is objectively a loaded phrase"? That isn't even commentary on the trans community, I'm talking about the English language in the most literal sense? Thanks for proving my point about those phrases being loaded by having an immediate overblown emotional response to me even acknowledging the word "tranny". Couldn't have come up with better proof if I tried.
>I'd rather be called a retard faggot til the end of timeNo one really cares about your kinks, but if that's really what you're into I think 4chan and 8chan would in fact be better suited to your needs. Unless you need to feel like it's coming from women? That's some real Rome Roy shit right there.
>>12857>opinions are not harmful, ever.>honest question, what are you trying to say with that greentext? if there's a point there i'm missing it.Opinions are absolutely harmful, the direct evidence of that is situations like Pizzagate and the numerous shooting directly linked to 8chan? Sorry, I didn't think I'd have to spoonfeed you that info, but here you go:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8chan#Controversiesliteral escalation to real world physical violence that started as just "opinions" on a website. The other direct evidence of that is…..literally of all of history? Sorry "opinions are not harmful ever" is just such a buckwild thing to say I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.
No. 12859
>>12853Man why don't you just hide the thread or scroll past it.
I just don't understand the absolute vitrol against those topics and don't see all that spilling over, derailing and radicalization that anons are talking about?
Can you name examples when you mention it?
No. 12863
>>12848>opinions are in fact dangerous and harmful You sound like part youtube's TOS-thought policing. Can't have those dangerous thoughts floating around. God forbid anyone has thoughts we don't like and possibly expresses them in verbal form.
>ban "retard, cunt, faggot, tranny"I see certain vernacular as part of board culture. When I get called a faggot, retard etc. I don't feel attacked or go cry in a pillow. You do know this is the internet where it's a mistake to take "mean" words seriously right?
No. 12865
>>12848calling people names is part of board culture and we are not men. i am an incredibly sensitive person, like, i cry over everything, and i've literally never been offended when you guys call me names that are common on here tbh. it's an imageboard, and it's populated by women who understand board culture. men are impulsive turds that are GENUINELY aggressive, that's why we, despite always allowing for namecalling, haven't resorted to absolute ridiculousness and insanity. i think there's a difference between calling someone "retarded" or "don't be a faggot", and being a genuinely evil or unempathetic person. usually people don't even use "retard" or "faggot" on lolcow in a way that's genuinely hurtful. there's really no culture of like, a-logging each other on here like there is in male spaces. offhanded "haha what a fag" comments are nowhere near vitriolic screeds and harassment, threats, etc, that men make toward each other. people here don't want to go out harming mtfs or whatever. "social justice" troons, with approval by large organizations and cities, literally march with bats to want to hurt women. unless we have a male infestation, i don't see the need to be so worried, and there certainly hasn't been anything so far on the site to even warrant your concern tbh.
No. 12866
>>12848>>12858I don't know what your hard on is for Pizzagate but I don't see how it's a good example for your "controversial opinions are bad because they lead to violence" assertion. You act like Pizzagate is going to recruit for ISIS or something (which in reality was created by the CIA funding the mujahideen - I believe that was part of Operation Cyclone - in the 80s, but I digress).
This opinions lead to violent acts rhetoric makes you sound like those people who say violent video games lead to violence. There will always be a few people who're weak minded and stupid enough to blame something they read on the internet for their retarded actions, but that's because they're stupid and probably don't belong on the internet. Reasonably intelligent people aren't going to take something they read on the internet or anywhere else for that matter, and use it as an excuse to commit wanton acts of violence against their fellow man.
I don't know if it still exists but I hate that there's a website where pedophiles go and TALK about their predilections with each other. However atrocious, expressing thoughts (that don't advocate for violence) isn't against the law. To penalize someone for THINKING about such a thing means advocating for criminalizing thought, which for now at least, doesn't exist.
Back to Pizzagate, people have a right to express whatever opinion they have about it, save the above mentioned caveat. That a few idiots decide to do something violent because they say they were motivated by something they read on the internet isn't the internet's fault, it's the fault of the moron(s) taking the violent action.
TL;DR - You sound ignorant.
No. 12869
File: 1578467713511.png (575.22 KB, 635x732, pizzagate.png)
>>12866This entire post is honestly the stupidest shit I've ever read in my life. I have to believe you dropped out of preschool and were never exposed to any basic history if you genuinely believe "opinions and ideas are harmless"
>I don't see how it's a good example for your "controversial opinions are bad because they lead to violence" assertionBecause it's
literally a controversial opinion that started and spread on 4chan/8chan that lead to a man showing up at a restaurant with an AR-15? How much more literal can you be? It's a cause and effect flow chart even someone as dense as you should be able to understand. If Pizzagate hits too close to home for you, I'd happily provide you with any of the dozen other similar situations that have happened in the recent past, since you're too busy reading your pedo forums and writing your ISIS fanfic to keep up with current events.
>That a few idiots decide to do something violent because they say they were motivated by something they read on the internet isn't the internet's fault>because they say they were motivated by something they read on the internet>they were motivated by something they read on the internet>something they read on the internet>motivated by the internet>isn't the internet's faultImagine being this stupid.
TL;DR - you've clearly snorted too much infowars brand dick powder if you're genuinely dumb enough to think "it's not illegal or dangerous for pedophiles to discuss wanting to fuck children"
No. 12874
This thread doesn't exist so people can fight over how evil men are, pizzagate and your tinfoils of the day. All of the actual complaints and issues have been drowned out by sperging by a few select posters, who certainly know who they are. Saying you know what the thread is for and still continuing to sperg about your tinfoils is not okay.
After this post we will start issuing bans.
No. 12878
>>12729imagine being this pathetic.
>>12732GC is part of radfem beliefs you complete idiot.
Good to know this sites still a trash pile and catering to angry men that want pp/gc threads banned/out of sight instead of the admin growing some balls and just saying "this is how it is"
(ignoring farmhand warning) No. 12880
>>12775I haven't used lolcow in a while, but I think the main issue is that it's not like radfems/terfs/whatever found this site and set up camp. These threads were started by regular lolcow users, on a board where you're allowed to talk about off-topic issues. There are video game threads on ot. Is this site not the place to talk about video games, then? Does that even make sense? Why be militant about one topic and not another, especially when it happens to be an issue many regular users experience?
I guess I'm asking, where does the line get crossed?
Why is it okay to kill parts of the organically created board culture here? I don't get why every single admin we've had has tried to kill parts of the site repeatedly.
A lot of boards are redundant or just worthless. Just hide threads you don't like, like everyone else.
(ignoring farmhand warning) No. 12892
>>12716I would agree with this except you have other boards which have random, non drama topics as well.
Personally I would revert this site to being drama threads only (pt/snow) given that the some drama/cow threads are limited-the reason given space on the site which is why I do not understand why there were non drama boards to begin with.
No. 12894
>>12882Except I don't recall the admin even saying
why the threads were merged in the first place. I asked in one of the threads, and admin/farmhands ignored my quesrion and someone replied "been saying it for ages, one of the mods is a troon". Admin replied to this calling this person a sperg, which means admin saw my question and ignored it. And any time a mention of the thread merging or tranny mods came up, farmhands would magically appear to call us spergs instead of actually giving us answers. Other people suggested it was because of arguments, but the thread merge caused 10x as many arguments than there were before.
Like, I get that this is your website and you can do what you want with it, and I respect that, but when you allow something for ages then randomly ban it and not give answers you can't really blame people for speculating.
No. 12897
>>12894I always got the impression that oldfags and the farmers who were against the pp threads also hated trannies/don't want males to use this site, they simply didn't identify as radfem.
But now you have people downright hating on "terfs" while kissing troon ass? Quite the demographic change.
>>12894>the thread merge caused 10x as many arguments than there were before.Absolutely.
>>12882>you had to constantly antagonize your fellow sisters who were just sick of it.Admin-sama, writing stuff like that just sounds weird af… Lc was always everybody shitting on everyone and everything, why are you suddenly writing bullshit like "we're sisters"?
No. 12900
>>12897I don't think most people here are hating on TERFS or kissing ass for trans people, we just find your constant sperging annoying.
I get how you guys want a place to talk about your female plights and all that but it turns into an endless loop of the same crap for anyone else who's not as invested in these issues. Particularly annoying when some of you guys leak your bullshit and complaining into other threads. Hopefully 2x might solve this but who knows.
No. 12903
>>12899Then it should apply for infighting in general instead of singling out that specific thread/board.
>>12900>I get how you guys want a place to talk about your female plights>yourWould it not be yours too?
No. 12909
>>12900>your female plights Lmao. If this isn't the most condescending tell of a man posting.
There's a self-admitted gay man venting in /ot/ right now. He's bitching about how he can't fuck his male sex shop coworker and makes it clear he posts for validation often.
Kinda sad how women who post here are treated like spergs for speculating when in reality there's proof of male LARPers here all the time.
No. 12914
File: 1578705319294.png (378.26 KB, 1264x583, g.PNG)
sorry, but i don't really understand why this was locked? this really isn't the same as the /g/ "not my nigel" thread to me. the /g/ thread is specifically and only for boasting. the thread that anon made is about concerns, complaints, frustrations, how they relate to their views, and general boasting.
it seems like it's just more of an all encompassing 'nigel' thread, negative and/or positive. even though anon named it the same as the other, the intentions are very different.
also, are we not allowed to have repeat threads even though the climate between boards is supposed to be different?
like, we have a reddit thread but the 2X reddit thread allows for more in depth discussion with a certain flair, without it being considered derailing. maybe i'm a minority but i think it makes sense to have "repeat" threads where anons can talk about these things and how they relate to our politics or views, specifically, without having to go on /g/ or /ot/ and end up sort of derailing. just my two cents. thank you.
No. 12921
>>12909Lmao I'm a woman, I'm just not very interested in female politics. Sorry not sorry.
>>12911Wow, someone who understood.
No. 12923
File: 1578783718191.jpg (47.92 KB, 625x471, 3d62d64251688224307c6a0951317d…)
>>12882
>I know not all gc and pp anons are like thisThanks, really. It sucks to be associated with so many bad apples, but I earnestly believe 2X is a good solution for lc. Strict regulation on all other boards to limit gc/pp sperging, derailing, and infighting seems to be the best option. I have no idea how you are going about bans for such things, but since it has been a continued issue, I would create lengthier bans including people who respond to their sperging. It would hopefully stop pp/gc from either derailing threads and encourage other posters to stop acknowledging them. This is just a suggestion as it obviously has been a thorn in your side for a while, not sure what you have and haven't tried.
Admittedly I find any "scrote/troon/terf reeeee" accusations pretty funny, it's pretty much a meme at this point but I can see how it's frustrating for others.
Admin, you're doing what you can. Don't let this place bother you too much.
No. 12929
>>12925This
@admin sorry you have lots on your plate with this pp/gc shit but there’s been one(?) anon in moo’s thread that does nothing but lick her ass and derail by going on rants about every point anons try to discuss. If you call moo ugly, they bitch. If you say she didn’t wear underwear, they demand proof. If you bring up relevant old milk to make a point they go sperg smackdown demanding proof of milk from years ago. Is this all the same anon or something?? It’s getting irritating
It’s really weird it’s been happening since the left thread or so and it does nothing but derail when anons are just trying to do the regular gossip
No. 12930
File: 1578815668413.jpeg (102.99 KB, 1024x1016, 0848EBC5-4E2F-4278-BC77-E8730E…)
>>12927I pour one out with you bb
No. 12933
>>12932Nah I’m not talking about mini modding nitpicking that’s fine. I’m definitely talking about this one anon (is it you anon?) who is always defending moo, any time someone criticizes her there’s always excuses they reply with why she’s like that, why it was all done big conspiracy, why it’s not true. I was sure it was umbran but surely she wouldn’t be that stupid lol
It just stutters discussion anon. It just causes infighting because both sides sperg out about it in the middle of discussing current milk. Why go out of your way so hard to reply to every anon with bad things to say on a gossip site if you AREN’T there to WK? It’s lolcow. people are going to call her ugly.
No. 12939
>>12937>>12938Right? Moo is a known liar, almost everything she says is a lie. Nitpicking/Titpicking is silly and some tinfoils are way the fuck out there that it's retarded (like her being a pedo) but to expect all tinfoils to stop is silly. What the hell
can people talk about then? The lipo rumors started as speculation and people got mad then too only to find out that she did actually get lipo. Some speculation isn't going to kill a thread and if you're going to use Moo's own words as proof of something, at least back it up with actual proof. That one anon keeps demanding proof and trying to shut down conversation but not giving any either, it's pointless infighting and mini-modding. If it's against the rules then report it, it's that simple.
No. 12941
>>12929>>12933>>12937>>12938>>12939>>12940Anons, you do know that there's an option to tinfoiling about useless bullshit and that's called shutting the fuck up? Most people stopped following the Momokun thread after it turned into scrolling through literally hundreds of replies of "What a fat tax-evading pedo rapist animal abusing bitch" spergouts based on absolutely nothing because obsessed anons just had to try and suck that saggy teat that ran dry ages ago. It attracts a retarded newfag userbase and enables PULL tier behavior, that thread is just one a-log away from a constant flood of "if
I got to go to Japan…" blogposting.
No. 12942
>>12937>>12938>>12939>>12940All of you make the thread unbearable. Is it that youre mad about the topics not allowed to be talked about in greentext?
>>12941 She HASNT had new lipo and tinfoiling, as mods have said, do nothing but derail. Why the fuck do they want to dredge up old shit. These newfags are infuriating and a mod needs to go into the thread, when they have better things to do, just to tell these fucktards to stfu about her family and old milk.
No. 12943
>>12942>>12941it's a catch-22 of a problem, isn't it? if no one can "tinfoil"/speculate and no one posts unless there's something noteworthy to talk about, it isn't much of a discussion. at the same time, there are anons who take it way too far and complain in the thread instead of taking it to meta like they should. both sides have
valid points but are irreconcilable with each other.
No. 12947
>>12935Bruh I didn’t post shit in that thread, you’ve got the wrong anon lmao
What, pray tell, are we allowed to talk about in Moo’s thread. Titpicking being banned I get, but we can’t even talk about if she wore underwear under a cosplay or not without
>>12941 sperging the fuck out.
I get repetitive shit is annoying, but some stuff in there is just straight gossip. I swear to god some anon in there is trying to run that thread in the ground on purpose. Shutting down anyone who says anything negative and getting the thread put in timeout for the infighting it causes. Now there’s a tinfoil for you
No. 12948
>>12945again, tinfoiling is fine, the thread isn't an archive. there are
certain topics that are shit to discuss over and over, but it's not because tinfoil is banned, it's because those topics are brought up by salty anons who want to cope with moo making bank. the thread needs discussion between milk or off topic shit crops up. if you don't like how the threads are, go elsewhere or report and move on. bitching about shit you don't like being discussed is cringe.
No. 12950
>>12942I rarely post in Moo's thread, I'm just giving support to people who want to talk without mini-mods screaming at people to shut up. Anons doing that are derailing just as much as the ones with the crazy tinfoils. It's not that hard to report.
>>12943>>12947>>12948Pretty much this. Both sides make good points but they need to stop fighting about it in the actual thread. This is how the thread ended up in snow.
No. 12954
File: 1578924660396.jpg (10.57 KB, 279x181, ddddddff.jpg)
as a finnish person, i feel that a total ban of emoticons is disrespectful for my cultural origins. we finns should have a special permit to use emoticons since it is part of our cultural internet identity.
No. 12968
>>12966Who is "screeching and crying"? Absolutely nobody, anon. Farmers only write stuff like "I knew it!", "Wow, I'm shocked" or "I bet Jeffree is the blackmailer". Nobody said anything along the lines of Nikkie being bad or whatever.
Why are you so angry? Nothing bad happened, don't get so riled up over what strangers write on an anonymous board.
No. 12973
>>12964>>12966You are way too mad at something on the internet. You're capable of writing a complaint without sounding like you're losing your collective shit.
Oh and, arguments and baits don't progress if you don't reply to them.
No. 12977
File: 1578975113396.jpg (146.29 KB, 1079x1062, Screenshot_20200113-195750_Chr…)
The final verdict I've come to after inspecting the poll, and discussing with staff, is to ultimately abandon /2X/ on the new server. I will also be banning all pink pill related topics off of /ot/.
My reasoning? Aside from the obvious voting duplicates, just the horrifying realization that close to 50% of all the voters didn't care about the site. If they didn't care about a major outing then they chose Chris Chan as an acceptable answer. Keeping /2X/ was validated twice and yet nearly half of all the voters didn't even know what the board was.
You can keep whatever is left of /2X/ before I archive everything. I think there is an ample amount of time to migrate to reddit or crystal cafe. Perhaps your very own instance. If you want to screech about it outside of your board then expect a ban, especially on /ot/. If you want to personally contact me about this then you can email me at admin@lolcow.farm or message me on the discord server linked above. I will not respond to this issue any further, as it has drowned out other issues throughout the week.
No. 12978
>>12977Are you going to post the entire results?
>If they didn't care about a major outing then they chose Chris Chan as an acceptable answer. I don't understand what this has to do with the subject of 2X. Would there be something wrong with wanting to out Chris Chan, and are you saying this was a bait option? I voted for Vick personally, I'm just trying to make sense of this detail and why it was worth mentioning.
>nearly half of all the voters didn't even know what the board wasWhich makes sense when you consider the link to said board was hidden in a niche thread on /ot/. If someone's strictly a snow or pt poster, they're not gonna know or give a shit. Even if they post to ot it doesn't mean they were in the PP thread checking for a board link they didn't know about. Unless they by chance stumbled into this thread during the window that it was being discussed.
>nearly half of voters What about the other half and some change who did know what it was. I don't see why less than half should hold as much weight. If it's not about the popular vote then what's the point of a poll.
I don't think there's a point in contacting you as your tone is entirely non negotiable. Kinda disappointed that you went this route, but not my circus not my monkeys.
No. 12979
>>12977a lot of users come here for /snow/flakes and do not care at all about vicky, kiki, etc. or maybe some are just here for one /pt/ cow and mostly flakes, or don't know everything about chris chan, or just don't care about those particular outings.
you purposefully distorting voting "i don't care" (about those particular outings) doesn't = "i am a voter who doesn't care about the site". this is such a bizarre justification. this is a really flimsy excuse, admin.
frankly, this is an embarrassing stretch you've used to invalidate the userbase with literally 1 poorly chosen question.
No. 12981
>>12978>Would there be something wrong with wanting to out Chris Chan, and are you saying this was a bait option? I think her point is that Chris-chan was never outed here. I don't think he's ever even had an active thread (and if he did, it died fairly quickly). Though, I don't see how it's relevant to the fate of /2X/, as there doesn't seem to be any proof that the 65% who wanted it or the PP threads make up the same 14.5% who would vote Chris. I'm not sure why it got any votes, besides there being newfags who chose it for some reason.
It weirded me out to see him as an option, too, but I didn't think it was worth pointing out, since the question itself was so unrelated to the point of the survey, and seemed so "added just-for-fun" that whoever typed it out didn't bother to use spell-check. I personally voted "kaka" at first, then "idc" after modifying my response for the re-validation, as I couldn't figure out why they were asking, or what it'd have to do with the new site/board scheme.
No. 12988
>>12986I was thinking "who would you like to see outed." Thought admin had new shit on the selection. In my mind I guess it made more sense because why would a poll on a current issue care about my opinion on past outings that in some cases happened years ago. I guess if I knew it was a bait question admin was using to guage site interest and newfag/oldfag, I might not have chosen Vick and went for Kiki.
Other anon's point still stands though as to why the "idc" option was taken as a neg on the voter when they simply might not have cared about the people listed.
No. 12991
>>12977You have absolutely no integrity and no fucks given, and by the poll of your OWN site are choosing to appease to less than 1/3 of the userbase. You are clearly motivated by your own personal feelings and obviously your friend circle considering how much you sperg and whine even when an anon suggests you are a "tranny" which is looking that way more and more tbh. considering how sensitive and easily unraveled you are you are probably getting your other friends posting on here to bitch and whinge and complain about 2X/PP on and on, and also if you're so sensitive what the fuck are you doing on gossip board wasting your time?
I dont know whats with lolcow having absolutely shit tier admins but how fucking garbage you are off the bat is really indicative of the future of the website.
No. 12993
>>12990See here
>>12882I mean, she did try to give a warning.
No. 12995
File: 1578981049291.png (12.02 KB, 587x350, Capture.PNG)
>>12978>nearly half of all the voters didn't even know what the board was>Which makes sense when you consider the link to said board was hidden in a niche thread on /ot/. If someone's strictly a snow or pt poster, they're not gonna know or give a shit.THIS. admin's rationale here is not great. plus, the whole "majority" thing that she's deciding to completely disregard because a minority (who we have no additional info about, were also LESS likely to vote in favor of /2X/ if they didn't know) said they didn't know. a lot of anons do not visit /ot/ (pic related), so why would they know? only 36.5% of those that voted even visit /ot/.
>>12981>Though, I don't see how it's relevant to the fate of /2X/, as there doesn't seem to be any proof that the 65% who wanted it or the PP threads make up the same 14.5% who would vote Chris.exactly, and i think both "idc" and "chris-chan" were "whatever" responses that were quickly ticked off because the poll was not about our favorite cows or their outings. /snow/ is the most visited at 72%, while 47% visit /pt/. it's not at all even a
valid excuse to claim people "don't care about the site" because they didn't care about those particular cows, or maybe just don't have knowledge of one particular cow, but instead follow other cows or flakes.
a lot of people also said "i don't care" or similar things in their responses to board schemes. doesn't mean they don't care about the site, just about the question. plus, as you say, where's the proof they're the same people? i voted kiki because it was funny, but i'm not a huge kiki person and was almost tempted to put idc because i don't really care about any of those specific cows in particular. maybe people preferred mystery's outing, raven's, etc.
No. 12996
>>12990YOU CANT MAKE FUN OF TRANNIES! ITS TROO FAR! but you can make insane nitpicks about females bodies and make fun of women with mental disorders and child sexual abuse histories~ uwu
>>12882The only people who applaud your dumbfuck choices are the rest of the anons who sound just as newly migrated as Reddit as so do you. "Cancer" is people being against troons/men but "cancer" is not the other shit your board is infested with? That is where your priorities are? Lmaooo
>>12993So why ain't the other shit being banned but only the anti troon/anti man shit ? Sounds like anon is playing fucking favorites and letting her personal politics influence her decision. Imagine lacking this much rationality or common sense lmao
No. 13001
>>12990This. Constantly seeing redtexts underneath posts saying things like “ot gencrit” is getting annoying. Anything negative said about troons is considered ot now? Even if it’s relevant to the discussion!
>>12977>I think there is an ample amount of time to migrate to reddit or crystal cafe. Says the admin banning gc discussion, lol. Not sure why you’d name reddit when that’s one of the most troon-infested places on the internet. It’s nice to see you fucking up a generally free-speech site because of your own personal political opinions.
No. 13003
>>13002Making a site takes hosting, time, and MONEY and not all of us have that. How come on 4chan they could had their fucking shitty alt right and incel mentality run around for YEARS unchecked but as soon as women get their own little ideology going it's banned, suppressed, and pushed back with such fervor. Does it not look suspicious in hindsight?
And since you're obviously a mod, or admin, or one of admin's friends posing as a normal poster, tell me why did Pink Pill and Gender Critical offend you so bad?
No. 13006
>>13002An imageboard with a culture that admin wants to redirect to satisfy her own preferences. There's always gonna be critics, as there have been with literally every admin on this site that ever was.
Remember them, newfag? Website moderation is pretty damn thankless as is, but I've always noticed the gratitude and praise moderation here got whenever a decision was made with a majority agreement among the userbase.
The criticism here is
valid. Who knows why you're getting so defensive…
No. 13010
>>13008More like
>reasonable questions being posed to admin while you try to antagonize an argument because you're smug over intangible imageboard decisionsI'd report you for derailing and being an obnoxious pest, but methinks nothing will come of it suspiciously enough.
No. 13012
So why can't the people against PP explain why exactly they're against PP other than just keep repeating the same thing over and over like a bunch of autistic hivemind redditors?
>>13011Newfag, redditor, autist.
No. 13014
>>13008Anons incapability to see differing opinions to their own, to the point that they reee until said opinions are censored, is truly pathetic. It’s the fucking internet, if you don’t like something just scroll past it.
There are MANY threads and attitudes in this hellhole that I despise, yet I don’t feel the need to assert control over the opinions of others. Only the privileged would feel so entitled and have enough idle time to push such bullshit, fucking honestly
This isn’t even about it being pink pill or gc discussing that’s getting censored that bothers me, but the principal of the matter - it doesn’t actively harm anyone (unlike the COUNTLESS instances of child porn, gore, and what have you posted in male majority spaces), and there were containment threads, so why are anons and farmhands so fucking petty that they feel the need to just censor discussions they don’t like? What, is the moderating too hard? Why the fuck did you dickheads volunteer your time to do so if you weren’t willing to deal with it, there are always going to be arguments and sperging. Perhaps farmhands and admin should stop being so goddamn anal about not having clashes between users, newsflash, people aren’t going to agree all the time - what do you do when confronted by opposing ideas when dealing with people irl? Stamp your feet and screech until they leave?? And HONESTLY, is derailing one /ot/ really the worst thing in the world when it is literally off topic, what is there to even derail! Pure autism.
TLDR; fucking get over the pink pill anons
No. 13015
>>13014Bro dont you know all the other
toxic mentalities on this site can fester but since I have a tranny friend and a man on the mod team the pinkpill and gender crit girls are so mean and hwurt my fewwlings :(
No. 13020
>>13018So how come the racist shit and all the other shit gets to stay here but GC and PP is sooooo harming to your senses? NONE of the opposing side is giving a good argument and is just responding blindly to aggression which shows me: A) You have a strong emotional bias B) you have a strong political affliation
I mean damn, even as someone impartial to GC/PP back then I didnt mind its presence and certainly not enough to get fuming angry at it as if it was some alt right shit so all of this is irrational to me. And none of you are fucking explaining your views and just saying "no!" which makes it look even worse.
No. 13026
>>13023This is obviously an anti-gc sperg trolling to make le terfs look even worse, but they will probably get banned and redtexted as if they're serious, anyway, even though
>>12704 was left alone.
I didn't believe nu-Lolcow was imminent before, but now I really wonder what's going to happen to this place by the end of the year.
No. 13028
>>13024Because she probably thought the survey would go her way. Since it did not, she's simply decided not to listen to the userbase, period. The excuse she gave is just that.
With this, she's made it clear that anon's opinions do not matter. If your thoughts happen to be in line with her and her in-group's, you're in luck. If not, rest in pieces.
No. 13029
>>13003You have a point but then why do you think that staff and admin got tired of this shit? Look at the absolute state of this thread. Some of you guys need to take a walk.
Anyways can a mod check the snow or onion thread for vince because hes probably self posting as gene
No. 13041
File: 1579000634649.png (81.97 KB, 1235x387, FUCK YOU GUYS BOO HOO.png)
how sensitive is admin exactly? especially with this post, it seems like she's only doing this because she's butthurt about being called a tranny. grown a thicker skin
No. 13046
File: 1579003314584.gif (1.43 MB, 320x180, milk.gif)
>>13045They're actually too retarded to realize how web hosting works on 2X right now
No. 13056
>>13051Cringe
>>12977How do you know votes were duplicates? I'm just curious. If it's the ratio of votes in regards to certain issues, I'm sure most voters only responded to questions they cared about like I did.
No. 13061
>>13054Explain how the survey was botted when you needed a
valid Gmail account to fill it out, and could only make one response per account, as confirmed in
>>12766. You really believe multiple farmers spent time making fake Gmail accounts, all validated with fake phone numbers, only to make less than 788 responses and account for a little bit over half of each vote on every category? It's kind of crazy, because your people were insisting botting wouldn't happen here
>>12768. I guess the tables have turned since you didn't like the results.
She also didn't elaborate on exactly how votes were duplicated, mention botting or even go into any detail at all. She didn't mention ban evasion, either, but I guess you had to tack that on.
I don't even know why I'm replying. Guess I'm just sick of the bad faith posts.
No. 13063
>>13061that reference to botting was that nobody was going to bot vote
against your board, not
for it. you literally got the results you wanted from the poll so i’m not sure what the big deal is. my bad, i thought she had mentioned ban evasion, i’m probably mixing up another post of hers; still wouldn’t surprise me if that was true though.
yes, i do believe people can take a few minutes out of their day to make fake gmails and use VoIP apps. as for revealing her methods? i find it reeeeeal fucking funny you guys are only demanding that now, but never when posts are labeled or revealed, or people are banned for samefagging or what have you, you just really want her to be lying and making it up. but she literally has no reason to make this shit up unless you’re a conspiracy theorist who thinks everyone that’s sick of GC derailing is a troon.
No. 13065
>>13063The post simply says no one's going to bot it, nothing about which side. Once more, botting that makes up less than 788 responses and couldn't even break into a uniform 70% in all polls? Everything on botting in Google Forms I've read puts botted results in the 1000+ range, and I'd wager that if someone wanted to bot, they'd get better results than this.
What am I demanding? All I said was that she didn't go into detail on the vote duplication, and she didn't. We'll never know what really went down unless she does explain, and that's fine. The survey is over.
If she doesn't feel the need to break things down, she doesn't have to, even if retards like you will continue to make wild assumptions without evidence.
You read something very short, and stretched it into a whole botting and ban evasion tinfoil, while complaining about tinfoils and conspiracy theorists in the same breath. And now you're randomly bringing up troons? The irony is thick.
Like other anons have said: Just go to /ot/ to rant. This thread is for admins to respond to complaints and questions, not your mad diatribes. Now that your so-called radfem sperg boogeyman has been sent packing, are you really this bent on taking their place as the nuisance of the site?
No. 13066
>>13065how is it not obvious to you which side the post is on?
>faggy radfem poll????
No. 13067
>>13055>>13027One of the things I’m gonna miss the most about this site when I inevitably get put out to pasture and quit imageboards forever is comments like this, anons.
>>13045Nobody “Botted” the polls you retarded little
faggot.
No. 13072
File: 1579012353084.jpeg (73.84 KB, 400x321, 1578699569115.jpeg)
ITT
No. 13075
>>12977You said that you would do whatever the polls reflected, here
>>12724And now you're going back on your word and choosing to go against the results and what most