[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password
(For post deletion)

File: 1569966678132.jpeg (1.24 MB, 3872x2592, 5-Steps-to-Mastering-Customer-…)

No. 11760

Please post all general issues and complaints here. If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.

>>>/meta/6821 should only be used for technical issues and suggestions (can't load site, site slow, bugs, site feature requests). This thread is for non-technical issues.

No. 11761

People still sperg-a-lergin' in the vent thread on /ot/ over politics after the warning.

No. 11762

The onision thread was being shitted up by a very noticeable green text anon who declared they weren't using sage to tell everyone something already debunked twice, and minimod, and went on to derail with infighting and even replying to a post about other stuff as if it were about them.

Took all my strength to report and not reply telling them to stfu, but now the only people banned out of it were those with less patience.

Why not ban the source of the problem? I thought it only went on that long because mods weren't around but they were allowing it the whole time to the detriment of the thread.

Starts at >>712853 continues on until >>712956

No. 11763

>>11762
You're all banned. You all shit up the thread, I issued the bans myself.

No. 11764

>>11763

OK thanks, sorry, just seemed like the initiator is still there, my mistake

No. 11765

Does Global Rule 3 apply in /ot/? Some sperg is posting over and over again about how some 13 yo girl looks retarded/autistic/FAS. It's really obnoxious and has nothing to do with the thread.

No. 11766

>>11765
Greta Thunberg is 16

No. 11767

File: 1570011670237.jpg (466.79 KB, 6538x645, bait collage.jpg)

Is this allowed? Just want to know if it's cool to reply to, & not cool to report. Strikes me as being intentionally unrelated to the cow, like they're trying to derail. (These are all about Onion himself, not Lame.)

No. 11768

>>11767
lol someone seems triggered

No. 11769

i see a possible religious spergathon coming in the LJ thread, with lots of anons thinking that jews must do x, say y and think z in order to be jewish. it's on the edge of becoming a derail so just wanted to point it out before it got there.

No. 11770

>>11765
>has nothing to do with the thread.
lmao you're talking about the unpopular opinions thread. nothing in that thread ever has anything to do with the thread. we already told you she's 16 yet you came over here to sperg. give it up.

No. 11771

File: 1570072049170.png (44.8 KB, 500x525, 1569901278135.png)

>>11768

Cool.

No. 11772

Can we report anons who are victimizing Lainey in the Onion thread? It breaks two rules: no tinfoiling & no whiteknighting.

No. 11773

>>11772
i don't really think that victimizing lainey is tinfoiling, and if it is, it's not baseless what it is though is wking and OT.

No. 11774

there's a lot of extremely obvious incelbait happening in the dumbass shit thread and anons won't stop taking the bait hard.

No. 11775

Why is there absolutely no moderation in /w/ while all you farmhands are ban happy as shit in /ot/?

No. 11776

Why are unsaged anons not being told to sage in PT? There needs to be an announcement again or autosage it. Im tired of seeing nitpick bullshit and opinions bumping a thread with no milk.

No. 11777

is it just me or do we need another townhall?

No. 11778

Can a farmhand do something about the nitpicking and unsaging going on in the plastic and proud thread? Anons in there are posting absolute garbage the last few days. Thanks!

No. 11779

can privilege and privileged be added to the list of words in redtext?

No. 11780

>>11779
ooh this

No. 11782

File: 1570147196319.jpeg (900.9 KB, 1242x1797, 911B6070-9A69-489A-A4B5-1F8A14…)

This isn’t mine, but I am confused by the ongoing moderation.
How is this off topic on the Onision thread when they’re talking about Greg not going down on Lainey?
Memes / images like this are frequently shared on there.
Can mods give some clarification on what’s “on topic” when the general conversation seems to be the same?
I am increasingly displeased with this moderation.

No. 11784

>>11782
its bringing up someone who is not greg. what is so difficult about that to understand? the post talked explicitly about sarahs friend.

No. 11785

>>11784
Yes, but the context is that he’s friends with Sarah. Sarah confirmed that Greg doesn’t eat pussy, and the discussion is around Greg eating pussy. Which is a dumb conversation to begin with, but it’s still contextually accurate.
Is connecting the dots too hard for autistic anons?

No. 11786

>>11785
I explicitly told anons in the projared and onion thread to stop posting twitter commentary unless it's relevant. Stop pretending that petty insults qualify as milk, it was off-topic as hell.

No. 11787

>>11786
Then ban the rest of the people talking about Greg eating pussy. If you’re going to ban one, ban them all. It’s not fair to ban on person, or another. Its the same inconsistent modding that’s been happening for months now.

No. 11788

>>11787
>then ban the rest of the people talking about Greg eating pussy
You're strawmanning and that conversation was two threads ago. Plenty of people in the thread have been banned for derailing and infighting all week. The redtext is there to make an example of the milkless twitter caps clogging up the thread.
>>11775
I don't think as many posts are reported from there compared to /snow/.
>>11777
We can have one if there is enough demand.
>>11772
Pretty sure bans have been issued towards whiteknights there.

No. 11790

>>11789
can we fix whatever is happening in the PT thread? that anon won't shut the fuck about her stupid wedding/husband and it's not milk at all. most of her posts are unsaged /ot/ blogposts.

No. 11791

>>11790

why are you so bitter anon lmao

No. 11792

>>11791
no one is bitter, bitch has been blogposting long enough. our queen wouldn't approve of people using her threads to talk about themselves.

No. 11793

Mod, why even keep this general complaints open if you’re never going to admit fault for anything though?
The conversation was very much about vaginas, and eating out because Greg tweeted today about lesbians being better in bed.
Que: conversations about Lainey’s pussy, and Greg not going down. It wasn’t off topic. And this in itself is fucking retarded, but I am hoping that you can maybe understand my frustration in the inconsistencies.
One minute Lainey discussion is entirely banned, and then its ok. One minute nitpicks with Greg go on, and then it’s not. One minute cowtipping is all the rage with multiple anons, and then?
I want to know your rules, so I don’t break them. Because they change every week.

No. 11794

>>11788
Thank you so much!

No. 11795

>>11793
>The conversation was very much about vaginas, and eating out because Greg tweeted today about lesbians being better in bed.
Nobody at the time was discussing oral, they were discussing tweets. It's literally just a milkless cap of some twitterfag insulting Greg.
Twitter commentary is not milk.
>One minute Lainey discussion is entirely banned,
Discussion of Lainey was never entirely banned. It was only banned outside of her thread if it didn't have any relation to onision.
>One minute nitpicks with Greg go on
Nope, nitpicking is banned globally.
>One minute cowtipping is all the rage with multiple anons, and then?
Cowtipping is never tolerated. Do you think I control what these monkeys do?
>I want to know your rules, so I don’t break them. Because they change every week.
lolcow.farm/rules

No. 11796

Is there any way we could move the Momokun thread to /w/ or absorb it into the Costhot thread? I’ve been a longtime follower and there’s rarely any milk there anymore, myself and other anons agree that she’s no longer /pt/ material and the threads are mostly just comments about her weird body and infighting. The last 4-5 months of threads have been the same over and over again and it keeps being said that she’ll become milky again but I sincerely don’t think it will happen again. There’s some infighting on the thread right now about this suggestion however I wanted to come here and see if we could possibly make the move, thanks!

No. 11797

>>11796
>myself and other anons

admin can see your IP, you know.

cows on /pt/ aren't there necessarily because they are actively milky 100% of the time, their legacy is what gets them that status. otherwise tuna and fahr wouldn't be there.

No. 11798

>>11797
I hope you’re not insinuating that I’m Mariah or one of her lackeys, because I’m not. I’m someone who has been following these threads for a long time and has noticed that they’ve been reduced to infighting and people just saying “something is going to happen!” for such a long time now, and nothing happens. And with threads like Luna yes it’s slow but at least the discussions are steady and relevant.

Another issue too is when anyone brings valid criticisms of the thread to the table, some anons will immediately jump on you and accuse you of being Mariah or her friends. It’s extremely annoying and unnecessary and makes it so it’s hard to improve the quality of the threads and make adjustments.

No. 11799

>>11798
lol i don't think you're moo, i just think you're an idiot since no one was agreeing with you that the thread should be moved.

No. 11800

>>11796
Question, why do you want the thread moved instead of just, I dunno, fucking hiding the thread? Why would a cow with as much legacy and idiocy as moo just get merged in to the fuckin costhot general thread??? You don’t get moved to snow for not having milk 24/7. There’s dryer cows on that thread who haven’t had real drama in a year. I just don’t get what’s your damage and why you’re so concerned about it both in moo’s thread as well as coming to whine on meta

>there’s nothing but infighting

>there’s infighting right now
Yeah because you brought up this stupid ot sperg in the thread

>me and other anons

Who?? Majority opinion seems to be to keep her there

No. 11801

>>11800
I made two posts on the Moo thread about it and then people started yelling about coming to /meta/ so here I am. Any infighting past my initial two posts I’m not apart of. I think you should go back and look at the thread because there are people who agreed with me before all the shitflinging happened. I don’t know why the slightest idea of moving Mariah makes the entire thread shit their bricks. I moved my discussion over here because I wanted to speak to an Admin about it in a proper manner, not fight with another anon like you who is weirdly hellbent on the current classification of Mariah Mallad on this site lol.

No. 11802

>>11801
"No more milk" is always annoying. I don't know why you thought that bringing it up there wouldn't cause infighting.

No. 11803

>>11801
Yeah, people are yelling at you because they’re there to talk about moo and you’re weirdly obsessed with seeing her moved to the costhot general thread and derailing by demanding to speak to a manager lol

No. 11804

Is requesting new threads when the auto-warning has already been posted ban-worthy? Because it should be.

No. 11806

##Admin Why is the Venus Angelic thread in /w/ - vloggers, lolita, cosplay when she is/does none of these things?

No. 11807

>>11806
/w/ is for weebshit.

No. 11808

>>11802
I never understood people who kept on screaming "NO MORE MILK STOP TALKING ABOUT HER!!1!" >>11796 If there's no more milk the thread will die on its own, all you're doing it causing infighting

No. 11809

Someone is derailing and scaring milk about Shiloh in the Onion thread.

No. 11810

>>11809
people are taking the bait so the onion thread is way off topic now. can admin pls place some bans and remind people not to feed trolls?

No. 11811

>>>/meta/11758
I'd second this if mods have enough time on their hands.

No. 11812

>>>/meta/11758
I'd second this if mods have enough time on their hands.

No. 11813

i think the large amount of blogging in the TND thread could potentially be warded off a little bit with a redtext notice on the original post in the thread. that way anyone who clicks on it intending to write a novel has a second warning before they post it. and props to the farmhands for promptly banning/redtexting egregious posters.

No. 11814

Holy fuck. Can somebody intervene in the onision thread? Idk wether to nope tf out or ride the spergocoaster until I die in screaming retard edgelord agony. It's autism in it's purest form and I can't look away.

No. 11815

>>11813
and the anons sperging out about drug statistics and posting fucking papers too.

No. 11816

>>11806
I'll only say she doesn't belong in /w/ because she should really get switched back to /pt/ again.
She's a legacy cow who's doing a lot of dumb shit lately. Yet I guess since anons will always have her narc mom to scapegoat even for the shit she does to this day, it probably won't happen.

No. 11818

there's obvious samefagging in the vent thread on /ot/.

No. 11819

Can we also add 'good look' to redtext? Lots of talk about muh optics lately.

No. 11820

There’s a huge amount of evidence that most of the screenshots released from some batshit retarded 16 year old are fake, but anons can’t accept it in the TND thread.
Help?

No. 11821

>>11820
those are not in the confirmed milk section so what's the problem, what are staff supposed to do for you exactly? they're not universally accepted as true, only the Tofu video is - and Taylor acknowledged that one. the germ of a story often leads to the truth with Taylor, as much as the stories might start off sounding far-fetched. there have ben a few I personally thought were bs but turned out to be something.

No. 11823

Can a mod address the talk about Moo being a pedophile in the thread to be bannable as well with her nitpicks about her tits? She isn't a pedophile, she doesn't go after kids, and dressing as a 'kid' who is a 5000 year old drahon two fucking years ago is old as hell milk that needs to stop being brought up. This argument is fucking dumb as hell at this point and just throwing around Moo being a pedophile or child molester when she isn't is really fucked up because some anons want to stretch what that means as far as possible.

No. 11824

Shayna's thread needs more monitoring tbh.

No. 11825

There's some ridiculous samefagging and what I suspect to be self posting going on about star_666 in the "Instagrammers you hate" thread.
>>>/snow/783701

No. 11826

The kpop critical thread is full of some newfaggotry derailing, it's borderline retarded. Can someone please ban these dumbfucks?

No. 11827

nametagging troll in Shayna thread

No. 11828

>>11827
and ppl taking the bait (SA)

No. 11829

Can a mod PLEASE put a stop the nitpicking in Moo's thread. It is nothing but bitching about her 'tits aren't normal'. Holy fucking hell they are tits. They sag. They are overly huge for someone her size who wasn't supposed to have tits like that to begin with and then she got fat and they got super saggy. This is what happens. Im tired of the whole thread being nothing but nitpicks about her tits [which in OP says it bannable] and the nitpicking about her BMI and shit.

No. 11830

>>11829
i totally disagree with you and the mod who posted that whole huurduur ban thing. the entire thread and point of the thread is nitpicking.

No. 11831

>>11830
Nitpicking is against the rules and the number one reason for complaints about the quality of moos thread.

No. 11832

>>11829
Unless she's sperging on IG, cheating her patrons, or being a tard on livestream her thread follows the formula of
>post pics of a recent set or selfie she took
>bitch about it for 20 replies

I think it's boring.

No. 11833

The Obayed thread in /snow/ is a fucking mess full of unsaged posts and a lack of milk, can a farmhand clean it up please?

No. 11834

File: 1570880537348.jpeg (86.82 KB, 1242x501, 34D07E62-137C-483A-AA0F-3DE1EB…)

What rule would a post like pic related break? It said the reason for the ban was unspecified

No. 11835

Lots of armchair psychologists in the Pixielocks thread on /w/.

No. 11836

>>11835
Was gonna say the same thing. The autism vs bpd debate is derailing the thread.

No. 11837

>>11835
It's gotten worse since her mental health awareness video too.

No. 11838

>>11834
Looks like derail to me.

No. 11839

>>11834
political discussion + 'derail'.
If you noticed everybody in that whole conversation chain got a ban.

No. 11840

Can mods hand out some bans/warnings/whatever to get the newfags in the instagram egirls thread to get them to sage? (I'd report the posts individually but it's been going on for 20+ posts so I assume that would be more annoying than helpful?)
>>>/snow/866800

No. 11841

>>11830
Honest question: Do you really get off on talking for 50 replies about Momo's nipples, tits and razor burn? I sincerely don't understand the idea of nitpicking someone's body because it's too boring for words and not interesting. There's only so many times you can say "lololo she's massive and her tits sag" until it becomes autistic and cringeworthy. Same goes for the pedo/tax evading/animal abuse "speculation". She's been milked dry. Leave the thread to be until she does something worth noticing again. Get a goddamn hobby or something.

No. 11842

>>11841
But then you might ban all discussion about looks/(subjectively bad) make up altogether (would also drastically affect other threads such as the Luna Slater or TND threads) because it’s just as nitpicky and repetitive.

It‘s still to this day impossible to tell where the line is between legit commentary and nitpick. By the info we’ve been given about what qualifies as nitpick all candids, posts about anything regarding her weight (including posting fake stats), Dropbox leaks, etc would have to be banned as well because muhh boring body shaming nitpick.
And well, in that case you might as well shut down the thread altogether.

No. 11843

File: 1570984650818.jpeg (819.53 KB, 1241x2274, rip.jpeg)

Can a mod unlock the Hartley Hooligans thread in /snow/?
Lola died and now Gwen will probably get milky since now both potatoes are kill.

No. 11845

File: 1570988435817.png (190.35 KB, 1440x874, 009.png)

To be clear, is merely discussing there being bait in a thread now a bannable offense? We can't even acknowledge that there's a problem in a thread we’re using anymore?

This ban would have actually made sense if I responded to the bait or dragged it out after the troll had already been banned, but neither of those things happened. I reported it, made two entire posts responding to anons who mentioned it being in the thread (and this was while he kept posting without getting banned, not after it was already over), then got back on topic as usual without a hitch. He continued shitting up the thread for quite a while after that, and nobody else replied to him, either.

The rules haven't been changed, they still state responding to bait (not just mentioning that it's there) is what's against the rules, so unless there's something else that wasn't explained, I'm assuming the farmhand behind this was just irritated for whatever reason, went full retard without paying attention to the actual rules of the board, and was too stubborn to fix their mistake in the end.

No. 11846

>>11845
A three day ban does seem a bit heavy-handed for a post like that, did you try appealing that thing?

No. 11847

>>11846
I did, basically saying the same thing and to amend the rules if things had changed, and it was denied.

No. 11848

>>11847
You might have been talking to a farmhand and they gave you a ban since some people have been saying they've suspected this. If they are going to be harsher on rules for that thread it should've been stated beforehand like previous farmhands have done before this round of them. That or they think you've posted about it too much idk

No. 11849

>>11848
>>11845
>>11846
How do you all not see that this is literally feeding the scrotes that come into pink-pill, though? It's the definition of taking bait. They want you to discuss them and give them attention. 3 days is little for being so fucking braindead if you ask me

No. 11851

>>11849
By that logic, having a GC/PP thread in general shouldn't be allowed since by simply talking about men or trannies in a negative light, we're "attracting" them and encouraging them. In fact, the site itself is just attracting bad attention by not being a safe space for incels.
The tard would've posted with or without me or anyone else commenting on them. He did it repeatedly, with no encouragement.
Aside from that, it's not and never has been against the rules to say water is wet, or point out someone shitting up a thread. Taking bait would have been actually responding to it.

No. 11852

>>11851
you deserved that three day sperging break

No. 11854

>>11852
Do you have any actual reason for that?
Actually, it doesn't really matter unless you're a mod yourself (in which case, kind of cowardly to not even say it with your chest).
The fact remains: Actual rule-breaking and derailing warrants 3-day or longer bans, not some farmhand getting personally buttblasted. Any non-retarded person who uses this site can agree with that.

No. 11855

>>11843
Sure.
>>11845
I mean, taking the time out of your day to tinfoil about scrots and homophobe-chan is not only derailing, but still somehow giving them the attention they seek and thus taking the bait to an extent.
Now I'm not saying you're guilty of this because I'm not looking at your post history but sometimes getting slapped with a bait ban is also due to having a history of taking bait or doing it multiple times within a short timeframe.

No. 11857

>>11855
I've talked about there being a troll in an /ot/ thread before without any issue or warning, and I see others do the same regularly, so it'd be weird for it now to be a big enough problem to fall under a multiple day ban.
I think if it's something that's being tightened on, the rule about bait should be edited, or they should've actually announced it, like >>11848 said.
As for the post history thing, I make it a point to report scrotebait and never respond to it, and I can't even remember the last time I got a ban/warning for derailing of any sort. Probably a month ago, at earliest.

No. 11859

>>11842
The mods have said before that discussion is fine, derailment when its EXCESSIVE which spergs keep doing is just fucking with the thread. We dont need, like exampled, 50 people saying the same shit. We GET she gets money based off her looks. Comment on it, let it go. The people who keep pushing bad tinfoil about pedo/taxes/animal abuse should be banned. Tinfoil that is unfounded is bannable anyway and we have NO evidence on any of those things in any thread and the dog thing was dozens ago and doesn't need to be brought up and picking up a dog and it yelping isn't the same as someone strangling a dog ffs. Moo just mishandled a dog while picking it up without asking. Not animal abused, just being a cunt.

As far as the tit shit goes, We get it. They saggy. You dont need to bitch about it 'NOT NORMAL'. Its fucking normal. Shut up. There are millions of bodies in the world. There isn't a set look for tits, you austic and she has had procedures? Whats there to really go on about? Point it out or let somene point it out and end the discussion. It doesn't need to be parroted 4837 times and 'lol those tits' isn't milk.

And at this point anyone not saging in the thread and isn't giving milk needs to be banned. Im so tired of these anons coming in with 'LOL look at her massive size' and not saging anything.

The fact that OP twice, with the shit threads, actually cropped out that a mod said to not nitpick her tits or instant ban is annoying. That needs to go back in the thread header.

No. 11860

>>11845
Your infighting/trash talking another anon and derailing a thread. Thats not pointing shit out, thats baiting baiting. Seems deserved.

No. 11861

>>11860
>3 days
>for a post briefly talking about a scrote/troll who wasn't banned until later
Nah.

No. 11862

>>11861
The mod is right, we dont know about previous bans either.

No. 11863

>>11859
>We dont need, like exampled, 50 people saying the same shit.

Exactly this. This is the only issue and then it got weird with the pedo stuff. Moo only did mild loli-related stuff because it's what her dumb incels are into, not because she's actually interested in children. Some anons throw their common sense out the window in that thread and cause a derail when it happens.

No. 11864

>>11863
The fact that half the posts are unsaged bs and tinfoil too is irritating. The mods arent address sage issues in PT at all. Some have BUMP in threads (not moos).

No. 11865

File: 1571071872911.jpg (56.84 KB, 756x404, titspergs.JPG)

>>11842
>It‘s still to this day impossible to tell where the line is between legit commentary and nitpick.
Well, let me spell it out for you. If Momo was, for example, making fun of other girls for having saggy tits and calling her own perky and gravity-defying, then it would probably be funny if people pointed out how much her tits sag. Because the conflict comes from Momo's intense self-deception that aggressively clashes with reality and maliciousness towards other girls. But she doesn't do that as far as we know, so pointing out for the nth time how her tits sag is boring and nitpicky as it doesn't really have anything to do with the state of affairs. It's just finding fault for the sake of having something to bitch about, which lowers the quality of the discussion. When Momo was bullshitting people about working out and drinking fit tea when her weight loss was actually due to getting liposuction done, it was appropriate to point out how lumpy and unbalanced her stomach looked because she was lying to people about a product she was endorsing and the nonexistent effort she put into improving herself. If she was open about it from the beginning, it would be much less interesting to point her Donkey Kong body out because there's no deception behind it.

Most cows are interesting because they were caught lying or having delusions of grandiosity, both traits which Momo had during the first 40 threads or so. Dropbox leaks were not a bannable offense because they pointed out how she was scamming her patreons with low quality costumes she was given thousands of dollars to produce. Again, the milk comes from the deception. Fake stats, lying again. Candids, they're also funny because they showcased how effortless her costume was and how much she edited her photos to falsify reality.

Anons like in the pic related are there just to shit up the thread quality, you can see how they're big perpetrators of infighting as well. It happens with all tinfoiling, someone starts with the "omfg I bet she rapes kids too you know how she lewded that loli dragon once!!!" sperging again and they're immediately there screeching "hi momo" when you tell them to calm down. You can tell they're there just to look for conflict and attention at any cost.

No. 11866

The catalog pages are a pain in the ass to use. They take forever to load and it crashes my browser more often than not. Anyone else?

No. 11867

>>11866
yep, super slow for me too

No. 11868

I think it would be a good idea for the egirl thread to get put on auto sage. Nothing but self posts, vendettas and newfags. There’s no real milk and never was, it’s just a shit thread that should be buried already

No. 11869

probably going to catch a ban for responding instead of reporting, but can admin or a farmhand maybe think about a sticky that says something like NO TIPPING, NO TOUCHING in bright red letters at the top of every page? there's a trend towards moralfagging and talking to the cows 'for great justice' that's taking over all the threads. unless lc is changing their stance.

No. 11870

>>11865
this isn't shitting up the quality of the thread at all. and it's not even sperging. explaining that moo ruined her own body isn't making the thread worse. the thread is and always has been bad, the quality of all cosplay cows threads are all bad. i think moo should be on /w/ simply for that fact. her milk is copslay milk and cosplay milk is bad.

No. 11871

>>11870
NTA-

but why does it need explaining? We already know, it's been said a million times, how many zoom-ins to parts of her body do we need to see?
How many detailed accounts of all the ways we already KNOW she messed up her breasts/body do we need?

We all know why she looks the way she does.

No. 11872

>>11868
this. not to mention the infighting

No. 11873

>>11871
i never said it needs explaining, just that it doesn't reduce the quality of the thread, which is true. the only thing that ruins the thread are anons who baww about people making posts they don't like. is reeing about moo's breasts repetitive and boring? maybe. but moo is a lather rinse repeat cow and she hasn't gotten in any drama, the past 4 or 5 threads are just "eww moo is gross and not nude yet, look at her eating and pretending to be on a diet" and nothing else.

No. 11874

>>11868
I'll increase moderation until newfags are weeded out.
>>11869
That's called reading the rules. No matter how plainly the rules are stated retards will still refuse to read them.
Report cowtipping immediately, it ranges between a 1 week ban and a permaban.
>>11870
I applaud your passion for defending such insightful commentary. Nitpicking is still against the rules.
>it doesn't reduce the quality of the thread, which is true
I needed this laugh, thanks.

No. 11875

File: 1571098513108.png (780.79 KB, 619x973, bianca.png)

>>11868
>>11874
On the topic of the egirl thread, whoever made the thread included a picture of Bianca Devins in the image op, who is the girl that was brutally murdered on instagram a few months back. She was murdered 7/14 and the thread was created 9/10. I guess it isn't breaking any rules but it does seem supremely fucked up and unnecessary.

No. 11876

>>11875
It's highly inappropriate there's no reason to have her, that whole thread is a fucking mess. Seriously.

No. 11877

there's a bunch of racebait sperging going on in gc/pinkpill.

No. 11878

>>11874
admin, i'm trying to say the moo thread is shit and won't be less shit regardless of what is posted.

No. 11879

>>11875
I mean she was an e-girl, no?

No. 11880

>>11875
I think people got way too worked up about Bianca being in the thumbnail. Her picture was used as an example of an e-girl, that's it. Honestly she probably wouldn't have even been brought up if anons didnt start sperging and being butthurt over it.

No. 11881

>>11875
Who cares? She's not even discussed in that thread.
>>11878
Yeah, that's true. One person's trash is another person's trashy time.

No. 11882

>>11881
yes she was discussed in that thread, and got trashed by some anons too. I reported it since I thought we were supposed to keep Bianca discussion contained to the one and only thread - and got a warning for doing so.

No. 11883

>>11882
maybe my skim was too shallow but all there seems to be is mentioning that she was the typical egirl and anons complaining about her in the image. she was 'trashed' more in /ot/ than anything but that was for like a week after she died.

No. 11884

Admin ever since you decided to kill of the gc and pp threads and merged them together they have been a mess.

You might as well delete that thread considering it has nothing to even do with pinkpill or gc anymore despite its name.

….or you know you can do the right thing and make seperate gc and pinkpill threads again.

No. 11885

>>11884
Just goes to show it was right to put you all into a containment thread since you have no idea how to behave yourselves and hate each other on top of it which is very feminist I might add

No. 11886

>>11885

>this meme again

Not her but how many times are you going to repeat that? The infighting is from scrotes who invade and the mods letting it happen. Also, antifeminists who want to attack lesbians and defend their Nigels.

The Pink Pill thread was fine on its own and so was gender critical. It made no sense to force them together.
I know I may not even be talking to an actual woman, but I'm so tired of this shitty victim blaming response whenever we try to get actual moderation

No. 11887

>>11886
And you think the scrotes came because the thread was merged? If anything it's easier to get rid of them since they gravitate to only one thread now instead of two but I guess mods not being online 24/7 to clean up your shit thread warrants constant whining about how you're being unfairly treated and how you're a "victim" topkek

No. 11888

>>11887

>REEEEE stop whining why should mods ever do their jobs???

You sound so dumb. As a matter of fact newfag it wasn't even close to this bad when the threads were separate. Maybe because the mods were actually competent back then but no, it totally makes sense to bitch and moan about how it's our fault whenever we try to actually get counsel on this
You don't even like the threads so how about you stop sticking your fat nose in whenever people who do use them try to reach the admin? This isn't your thread

No. 11889

While the merge has curbed the radfem moralfagging on other boards etc so far(much thanks for this), the actual thread itself is garbage. I haven't seen this much racebait/homophobia/anti-manlet sperging in a long time. The thread definitely needs more moderation, don't be lenient with derailment bans at all.

No. 11890

>>11887
You're not allowed to post your opinion on threads dude, only that anon is allowed to complain, and you can't give opposing feedback to the admin team on that topic! /s

No. 11891

>>11890

Yeah, screeching like a bitter pterodactyl whenever anyone says anything about a thread you're eternally mad about and don't even use isn't valid and no one really cares to hear it. It's not even really a complaint. It's just you bitching out of salt

No. 11892

Is it possible to divide GC and pink pill thread?

We have like 6 different threads about attractive/unattractive people yet we have to deal with 3 different discussions in ont thread

No. 11893

>>11891
the only one screeching here is you. the tard rage is intense

No. 11894

>>11893

>no u

Quality post. I wonder why no one listens to you.

No. 11895

File: 1571209761893.jpeg (62.33 KB, 500x281, serveimage2.jpeg)

Can we get a mod to see if it's one imageposter/samefag that's posting the Braco spam?

No. 11896

>>11895
*in /ot/
Just to clarify

No. 11897

>>11894
seems to me mods listen to me more than they do to you. you know.. considering your assange-level shit slinging still hasn't gotten your precious threads unmerged

No. 11898

>>11897

Sure Jan. Stay mad about threads you can ignore and hide.

No. 11899

Weird how the second GC/Pinkpill is brought up, the general complaints and issues thread dissolves into infighting and everyone screeching at eachother. Can you all shut the fuck up?

No. 11900

>>11892
Agree. I wonder if one of the mods just didnt like the gc/pp threads in general and decided to merge them

No. 11901

Just came to humbly suggest starting to hand out bans for "muh psychology studies." People blogging about their absolutely retarded half-finished bachelors degrees is literally never relevant - and so, so irritating.

No. 11902

>>11901
It is a bannable offense on /pt/, /snow/, and /w/ regardless of sage. Report it if you see it.

No. 11903

is sperging about someone not being a cow against the rules? like, if you don’t think someone belongs here just report the thread instead of clogging it up with multiple posts white knighting them

No. 11904

>>11903
Yeah, this is happening a lot in snow and it's really annoying, especially in the DDLG thread. If someone doesn't like a thread I don't see why they should keep clogging up the thread with posts about how it's not milky

No. 11905

>>11903
This happens so much in snow.

No. 11906

Thanks for the quick bans in the PP/GC thread.

No. 11907

I thought the boy and girl idol thread had be merged. The boy idol thread is now on their second thread and the female idol thread is still periodically bumped. Could farmhand /admin make sure the next on is merged?

No. 11908

racebait in gc/pp again

No. 11910

>>11908
Adding to this: do you guys permaban all these racebaiting retards? Because they keep coming back and derailing. We might as well just turn PP/GC into /pol/ 2.0.

No. 11911

>>11908
I swear to fucking God the race baiting is coming from the same group of retards, they get extremely sarcastic in the same way, without fail

No. 11912

>>11911
and the sad thing is, they keep falling for it again and again while showing their true colors. They keep saying they are for real women while being racist to real wen. Why can't they go make a white radfem discord and fuck off? It's time for mods to ban them for good.

No. 11913

>>11912
Very funny that you complain and encourage for pink-pill to be banned while doing your very best to start shit in that thread.
Pink-pill isn't going anywhere. They can have their thread given that they behave, you on the other hand have not.

No. 11914

There's two new vent threads going, not sure if anyone wants to lock one of them to avoid confusion.

No. 11915

Can something be done about the horrorgami person who's been cowtipping? She's done it in both Kelly Eden's thread and now Lori's thread, on two different platforms. I'm sorry if this comes across as complaining, just don't know if she's doing it with other cows too.

No. 11917

could you please do something about the sperg(s) in the kpop critical thread attacking anons whenever they answer questions that are being asked about idols?

>anon1 ask a question

>anon2 responds
>anon3 comes out of nowhere reeing and calling anon2 either a "stan", "ratmy" or "nctfag"

it's incredibly annoying, promotes infighting and takes up space. at first i thought it was someone shitposting, but now the posts seem oddly aggressive.

No. 11918

1. your mods/janitors are too invested in certain cows and they obviously are lonely. lets take the onision thread. I have been following onision for ages yet i was banned for tinfoiling. lol. then the responses was quoting lainey and greg. so we take the word of cows at face value now.
then we have wk of cows. the mods are wk. they are obviously getting offended when certain topics are brought up. I have been on the internet for a long time. I have stopped giving histories on this site because i get banned. like most people dont know jeffree predates myspace. but if i mention the site I get called tin-foiling.

2. then we have the posters who pretend to be mods. they have chased away a lot of farmers. the bryan stars and dasha posters have moved on. there is good content now but we arent getting it. please watch you mods they are slowly killing the site.

3. sage needs to be on all boards. a mod called me autistic but whats autistic is bumping a thread every 15 minutes or trying to fill up threads.

4. ok someone bumped the thread to see if anyone has milk. the mods should delete some of these 2 word post.

No. 11919

>>11918
based on this post alone i can say the mods were spot-on with calling you autistic

No. 11920

File: 1571404708140.jpg (20.43 KB, 468x286, article-1340274-019169F9000005…)

>>11913
Wow, I think a lot of us speculated people would post bait in the PP/GC thread to get it banned but it's hilarious they even came to meta to say mods should ban the thread lmao.

Thank you, based admin.

No. 11921

>>11918
Are you complaining about a ban you received 8 weeks ago?
> the responses was quoting lainey and greg. so we take the word of cows at face value now.
This is one of the reasons the onion thread is cancer. It's just something that comes with the influx of twitter sjws.
>. then we have the posters who pretend to be mods.
Do you mean minimodding?
>sage needs to be on all boards
Sage is on all boards.
>4. ok someone bumped the thread to see if anyone has milk. the mods should delete some of these 2 word post.
How do I even respond to this?

No. 11922

Why do mods on here keep banning me for ANY use of "xd" even if all instances I used it was to mock the anon I was replying to? Is the use of "xd" banned period? I dont get it.

No. 11923

>>11922
dont understand the point of a ban when its obviously used ironically

No. 11925

>>11922
Appeal your bans if you think you didn’t break a rule. Someone might have been clearing the report q and missed the sarcasm, when you’re going through 50 it can be a honest mistake.

No. 11927

>>11922
I always thought it was stupid that even emoticons that aren't actual emojis or weeb kaomojis are banned. this is the only image board where you can get banned for using dorito face.

No. 11928

Could something be done to stop talk of bpd in the pixielocks thread? The majority of the shit posted is infighting about symptoms, if she has it at all, and armchair diagnosis about what she really has. Its not milk and is just encouraging nonstop arguments

No. 11929

>>11928
We barely get any reports from there - next time you see such behavior, please report the posters.

It is impossible for the farmhands to try and manually manage all the posts that go up on this site. We rely a lot on posts being reported.

No. 11930

Can the lesbian hating sperg in Kpop Crit be put to pasture? He/she sperged about "dykes" about 4 times in 2 days

No. 11931

>>11760
Could something be done about the Jared WK in the ProJared/Holly thread?

No. 11932

>>11881
>Who cares? She's not even discussed in that thread.
….the multiple people complaining about it and reporting it care, clearly. What kind of logic is this? You have literal proof of people caring in front of you. If I wanted to see a murdered girl getting trashed I'd go to 4chan.
>Rule #5: Don’t post about wishing bodily harm on a subject or group. (a-logging)
How does multiple people saying someone deserved the extreme "bodily harm" they got not clearly fall under this category? The girl is dead and people are still wishing bodily harm on her.

>>11879
>I mean she was an e-girl, no?
No, at the time this thread was posted she was not an e-girl because she was dead. She is no longer in the e-girl category, she is in the murder victim category.

No. 11933

>>11932
People still complaining about Bianca being talked about in the thread weeks ago is ridiculous. Get over it, you got an answer and it's over with. Nobody is even talking about her anymore except for people who want to keep bringing it up and being butthurt over it

No. 11934

Can we get a sitewide hellweek (except for /g/)? Are we still short on mods?

No. 11935

I was banned for three days but it only gave notice with 55 minutes left of the ban and let me post unhindered before that. Are bans broken or what?

No. 11936

>>11921
i know i will be banned for this but im the op. admin, are you a woman. you seem to be as lolzy as the regular posters.
i complained about a ban from weeks ago because i just saw it.

yeah, i think im too old for this site now. i will see my way out.

No. 11937

>>11935
You were only banned for a specific board. You most likely only got the notice then because that was the first time you tried posting on that board since the ban was issued. Bans are working fine.

No. 11938

okay, we were supposed to complain here about bans and shit, right? alright, the mods ban way too much in the Onision thread. like way, way too much, over dumbass stupid reasons.

also, build an autosage feature or whatever. just a little checkbox you can tick that when its a major update, you click that shit, when its not, boom the thread don't get bumped
you guys seriously need to do something about these banhappy triggered mods, because the shit is getting silly now. or hell, has been silly for years.

ok. thats it. there i said it here.

No. 11939

>>11938
clearly you haven't been here for years if you think an autosage feature isn't something we have you dumb newfag. threads get autosaged all the time

No. 11940

>>11938
Go baaaaaw on twitter or whatever hellhole you came from

No. 11941

>>11939

firstly, why get angry over me suggesting a handy feature? second, if you have this neato feature why not use it and why ban people for "not saging"?
I have commented on this many a times before, you people don't seem to understand what sage actually is.

>>11940

again, whats with the hostility? why are you people being so defensive?

No. 11942

>>11941
because autosage is for threads that have absolutely nothing interesting about them anymore and are just full of fags like you. keep doing what you're doing and you might get your wish of an autosaged onion thread

No. 11943

>>11942

you are confusing the type of autosage i mean with the little anchor thing, you really have no idea how to run a chan, do you?
I could built the feature I'm recommending in for you in 15 minutes flat, but hey, im a dirty male right?
keep up your spergin', its hilarious.

GIRL POWER!

No. 11944

>>11943
i don't even run this website what the fuck are you on about? and yeah you are a dirty male who needs to get the message that he's not welcome here. clearly you're not fond of the website either so i don't get your incessant fagging all over this board. is it autism?

No. 11945

File: 1571608153974.jpg (32.56 KB, 614x520, Image1.jpg)

>>11944

aww so angry that you can't budde-ban me after all these years still. say how is that user-agent thing working out for you?
hmmmmm delicious!

GIRL POWER!

No. 11946

>>11938
mental retardation shouldnt be so funny but here we are. the onision thread is filled to the brim with twitter newfags and they deserve every ban they receive.

No. 11947

Imagine being too fucking stupid to know lolcow was founded by a male who did all those features you complain about kek
>>11945
Yeah like changing your useragent is going to hide you're the same autistic kiwifag who unironically uses vivaldi.
Keep entertaining us.

No. 11948

>>11938
tinfoil, please no ban, but i'm pretty convinced that the admins are trying to kill the onision thread for taking up too much website traffic

No. 11950

>>11948
Does it though? PT is a popular channel, but OT is usually has something going on because of newfags whereas PT could be waiting for a while sometimes.

No. 11952

>>11941
My God shut the fuck up. You do know saging is when you aren't delivering milk, right? Thats how that works you dumbass.

You have an opinion - SAGE
Lolzy fanart/meme - SAGE
Correcting an anon because you disagree - SAGE
Anything at all that is being posted by the topic of the thread - NOT SAGE -POTENTIAL MILK
Someone commenting on Twitter/Insta/YouTube about said topic, but not adding anything new besides a 'burn' - SAGE

Unless you have milk, everything you post should be saged anon, so fucking do it and stop bitching about your bans. Maybe learn how this site works and how saging and threads work.

No. 11953

>>11948
i'm not the raging scrot, i just want to get it out of the way first bc i know some anons will blame me for it. farmhands will see i'm not, that's what matters, but:

there's something fucky going on for sure. i'm an old user, i've been on here for several years. something changed and i don't think the mod team/admin realize that they're killing the board. i don't agree with the "too many bans reeee" crowd but idk, the board seems deader every single day, i feel like the actions being taken are keeping people from participating rather than encouraging better engagement.

i think the team's focus should be on keeping the board alive and on its course, not kill it so that they have less to do.

No. 11954

>>11953
It sounds like you're describing one thread.

No. 11955

>>11954
well, mainly the onision thread, sure. thanks for keeping up with my posts admin-sama!

No. 11956

File: 1571638781469.png (42.44 KB, 1910x152, jesus.png)

hey mods, can you ban whoever keeps screenshotting and posting my name on the usagi/kelly boards? I know her irl and it's irritating being called a selfposter when why the actual fuck would I. I don't want to have to go dark on social media just because this of this fuckhead.
I left comments on their stuff but for actual fucks sake I did not post it here.

tl;dr vendetta chan is smearing my good shitposting name.

No. 11957

>>11948
I think it’s mostly because there’s some careless moderation. I feel like bans are thrown left and right for things that aren’t stated explicitly in the rules / hypocrisy for one thread over another, and then when something bad is happening it’s totally disregarded.
Lolcow will continue to die as long as moderation isn’t done properly.

No. 11960

>>11956
What the fuck, I was was the anon in your screenshot and I have no idea who the hell you are irl, jesus christ. There were multiple people calling out horrorgami for cowtipping across Lori's thread and Kelly's thread. I have no fucking clue where you got the assumption that the few people calling it out are the same person who has it out for you.
Also, the majority of people were calling you out for cowtipping, not selfposting.

No. 11961

>>11960
am horrorgami.
I'm not talking about you specifically, the original anon who is posting my screenshots in the kelly and lori thread. they DMed me on instagram right before posting it here, which is why I knew to check here,
i know them irl (i think) and they've been following me on throwaway accounts.
it isn't cowtipping, it's me interacting outside lolcow. this board's rules dont apply to my life outside of it. it's considered cowtipping because it's posted here. it's not that hard to understand.
I'm asking mods to delete the screenshots from vendetta-chan because she's only doing it to fuck with me. I don't like being doxxed and called a cunt for no reason.

tl;dr I was being facetious to lori and kelly in my own time, gets posted here, suddenly cowtipping. that's not how it works and I honestly expected better from you guys.
I was being pretty cunty to kelly/lori but i've know about both of them/interacted for years regardless of these boards so I dunno what to tell you besides stÖp

No. 11962

>>11960
also anon who i screenshotted in >>11956 was literally to refer to you telling me to post here, not calling you vendetta-chan. sorry for the confusion.

No. 11963

Is it possible for the Obayed thread to get put on autosage or anything to deter Obayed and his "harem" from self posting? The thread itself feels like its just one big self post. There's no milk, just vendettas and selfposting.

No. 11964

File: 1571688284832.png (2.17 MB, 1678x1630, LORIYOUFUCKEDUP.png)

>>11962
>>11961
vendetta chan is lori, screenshots as proof. think that's pretty notable. have DM screenshots if you need more evidence.
feels good man.

No. 11965

>>11948
i'm kind of glad it's dead… it was taking way too much mental energy to read through the dumb posts of everyone's opinions on how to properly beat a dead horse. i like reading his milk but it was legit turning into an abused women's hugbox thread. was fun while it lasted though, i learned a lot. thanks for putting up with us for so long admin-sama and for doing the right thing

No. 11966

File: 1571802523154.png (1.27 MB, 3552x1886, eye tee tee.png)

I can't believe I'm actually posting an annoying long post but I came back after a month long break like I usually do and missed the thread merge drama, but thanks mods. Im supposed to share a thread with pink pillers when I want to talk about GC stuff and radfem stuff.
When women wanted to vent about tranny buffoonery they went to the GC thread.
When women wanted to talk about beauty culture, our pornified society, religion, and sex work they went to the radfem thread (that they ASKED FOR in the town hall).
When women wanted to complain about men, either for valid reasons or for femcel schizo reasons they went to pink pill. And now these 3 very different subsects of women; feminist or not are supposed to share a SINGLE THREAD and NOT infight? What the fuck were you thinking? Pic related. One of these things is not like the other.

I do not expect the admin or farmhands to understand or care about why these 3 different groups need their own threads but we do. There is going to be friction in GC when it comes to being CRITICAL about GENDER, even when it doesn't have to do with troon hate (lots of anons seem to think GC = Troon Hate exclusively) There are going to be disagreements in the radfem thread about all sorts of shit, or political lesbianism, or having a boyfriend, or whatever. But it's an imageboard, we should be allowed to duke it out with each other. I hope I can say that most of us can handle it. I am totally fine with bans being given when someone derails a conversation that has nothing to do with feminism/gender crit ideology however I do not understand why we are being punished because some mods might take personal offence to what we believe. I don't understand why it's necessary to overpolice these SPECIFIC threads for "infighting" when what you're really talking about is just discussion in the classic vitriolic imageboard way.
You don't want politics shitting up boards (even OFF TOPIC)? Ok, give us a /pol/. You can even have your own "go back to /pol/" memes. You don't want a /pol/? fine. Let us have the GC and radfem threads back. They were popular and successful threads even if you personally don't agree with them. People can't handle hiding 3 threads every couple of weeks? You tell people to integrate with board culture but you can't even use basic imageboard functions?

You tell us that we can go to "another site" to express this stuff. Where exactly? On tumblr you get banned. On twitter you get banned. In Britain you can be arrested for misgendering. 4chan is a male dominated board. Mumsnet is a site for mothers with young child and they should not be expected to bear this cross.

Give use back GC and radfem. Or merge GC and radfem general but do not insist that we share a thread with PP.

No. 11967

File: 1571835232228.jpg (100.46 KB, 800x679, lhtb0byg26l01.jpg)

>>11966
this has to be a troll post

No. 11968

>>11966
Why not make a radfem imageboard?

No. 11969

>>11966
I can't believe I'm actually posting an annoying long post but I came back after a month long break like I usually do and missed the thread merge drama, but thanks mods. Im supposed to share a thread with pink pillers when I want to talk about GC stuff and radfem stuff.
When women wanted to vent about tranny buffoonery they went to the GC thread.
When women wanted to talk about beauty culture, our pornified society, religion, and sex work they went to the radfem thread (that they ASKED FOR in the town hall).
When women wanted to complain about men, either for valid reasons or for femcel schizo reasons they went to pink pill. And now these 3 very different subsects of women; feminist or not are supposed to share a SINGLE THREAD and NOT infight? What the fuck were you thinking? Pic related. One of these things is not like the other.

I do not expect the admin or farmhands to understand or care about why these 3 different groups need their own threads but we do. There is going to be friction in GC when it comes to being CRITICAL about GENDER, even when it doesn't have to do with troon hate (lots of anons seem to think GC = Troon Hate exclusively) There are going to be disagreements in the radfem thread about all sorts of shit, or political lesbianism, or having a boyfriend, or whatever. But it's an imageboard, we should be allowed to duke it out with each other. I hope I can say that most of us can handle it. I am totally fine with bans being given when someone derails a conversation that has nothing to do with feminism/gender crit ideology however I do not understand why we are being punished because some mods might take personal offence to what we believe. I don't understand why it's necessary to overpolice these SPECIFIC threads for "infighting" when what you're really talking about is just discussion in the classic vitriolic imageboard way.
You don't want politics shitting up boards (even OFF TOPIC)? Ok, give us a /pol/. You can even have your own "go back to /pol/" memes. You don't want a /pol/? fine. Let us have the GC and radfem threads back. They were popular and successful threads even if you personally don't agree with them. People can't handle hiding 3 threads every couple of weeks? You tell people to integrate with board culture but you can't even use basic imageboard functions?

You tell us that we can go to "another site" to express this stuff. Where exactly? On tumblr you get banned. On twitter you get banned. In Britain you can be arrested for misgendering. 4chan is a male dominated board. Mumsnet is a site for mothers with young child and they should not be expected to bear this cross.

Give use back GC and radfem. Or merge GC and radfem general but do not insist that we share a thread with PP.

No. 11970

>>11967

Hard agree. >>11966 anon sounds almost sane, nothing like a genuine gc/pp/rf martyr.

No. 11971

I just want to know if I'm the only one struggling with clicking the little tiny links to the various boards at the top of the site. I would use the catalog as well, but it's basically useless bc it's so slow. Admin is there any plan to fix that? Any idea why it happens? I'm not techfag but maybe it has something to do with the infinite scroll?

No. 11972

>>11971
no offense anon but you either have really shitty internet or a really old pc kek

No. 11973

I was banned just because I said we would be better of without kids that murder. Wtf?
Is this reddit or mumsnet now?
This isn't against any rules afaik and it's certainly not a-logging. Whichever mod banned me did it purely driven by emotion. Are emotional bans now a thing?

No. 11974

>>11973
actually, nevermind. Fuck this site and fuck retarded mods.

No. 11975

>>11973
>advocating for children to be murdered isn't a-logging
take your meds

No. 11976

>>11975
It's murderers. What difference does it make if it's a kid? I knew at the age of 9 that killing isn't okay, what makes that kid exempt of justice?
Seriously, you're fucking retarded.

No. 11977

>>11976
you're really trying to continue this argument on /meta/ while also sperging and insulting everyone. please keep going it's really funny

No. 11978

>>11973
>>11974
>>11976
I just want to respectfully point out, for the record, that this just proves my other post
>>11966
We're supposed to share a thread with these retards.

No. 11979

>>11973
I hope you realise, we still know it's you, the resident autistic kiwifag.

No. 11980

>>11969
While I agree that the three are only vaguely related and should be treated as separate topics and therefore get their own thread each, I also kinda get why it’s been done.

Especially radfem bullshit has bled through all boards and topics and femcels started tone policing the stupidest shit in various threads across all boards. They need to be kept at bay and LC is not meant to specifically attract that kind of audience (or at least that’s what I got from Admin‘s/Farmhands‘ statements so far).

No. 11981

i smell a few anachans in the infinifat thread

No. 11982

>>11972
I'm on a tablet… One other anon said they were having trouble with the catalogs; I was curious to know if admin knows/cares if it was a common issue. There are a bunch of little things imo that make this website a pain to navigate. Normally I dgaf but I love this website lol

No. 11983

>>11982
yeah imageboards just aren't really made to be used on tablets/smartphones. it's gonna be clunky no matter what unless the entire set-up changes which imo it shouldn't. just invest in a notebook or something

No. 11984

>>11981
Don't get so excited. There's barely any meat on those bones anon

No. 11985

>>11983
Touché thanks.

No. 11986

>>11982
There will be mobile support on the new engine. I don't have a projected date yet but this is something I've been working on my own free time.

No. 11988

>>11986
Cool! Thanks for the info and for your hard work.

How many unique visitors does lolcow get? I'm curious to know how many farmers there are

No. 11990

>>11966
At least one of the posts in the “radfem” section was classic cringy libfem sperging if you read the context (attacking another woman → bait/switch to accuse that same person of actually attacking women to appear self-righteous), and one that you put in “radfem” while another you put in “pink pill” are obviously by the exact same poster.
That chart is awful and just makes us look autistic, anon.

No. 11991

>>11981
There's a festering nest of anachans here, partly in the anachan general and I think maybe in an /ot/ thread about meals also? They like to pretend to talk about "milky" skellys and get big mad at the fatty fake anachans. There are a smaller number of "normal" posters in there I'm sure (I'm one) but the general atmosphere of hunger is palpable.

There does tend to be a lot of sperging around FAs no matter what, they're a fun topic but it does attract the judgy types, the weightloss bloggers and also the hungry types looking for motivation to not eat. It's an interesting idea that one of the regular anachans might have made the thread… I wonder? I go to bth threads but I just find the extreme eaters to be interesting at bth ends of the spectrum. Also the FAs are staring to have real social impact now which makes them a shitty and dangerous movement.

No. 11992

>>11990
>makes us look autistic
Pfft baby you ARE autistic. You all deserve to be chased off the site. If anything PPfags are the most tolerable of the three.

No. 11993

>>11992
We're not the ones who got exposed for shitting up threads, then coming here to demand they be banned, sorry.

No. 11994

So, some more hypocrisy on bans again?

Typing lIKeE ThIS is ok again?
I knew my minimod rant would get me in trouble, but what the fuck do you guys mean the other things aren't against the rules?
"All users are expected to contribute in a constructive way and are discouraged from posting low quality comments and images."
1.1 Do not blogpost. Blogposting means sharing your personal experience, perspective, or anecdote in a way that’s not directly relevant to the discussion.
1.4 Do not lament about a cow’s shortcomings and past events if it isn’t relevant
7.1 Nitpicking
7.2 Repetitive comments



Those things are what I reported. Lol. Get fucking real.

No. 11995

>>11994
>but what the fuck do you guys mean the other things aren't against the rules?
You were banned for minimodding and asked to report the posts instead of replying to them. Nowhere does the ban state that what you were referring to wasn't breaking the rules. Hope that clears things up for you.

No. 11996

is there a reason that on /w/ and /snow/ when an OP is banned for the thread being shit, the thread doesn't get locked?

No. 11997

>>11996
I think it's because the subject itself is interesting so maybe not locking them is a warning to make a better thread next time but that the topic is welcome? I'd imagine at least.

No. 11999

Can admin/mods see all my embarrasing post+deletes?

No. 12001

>>11999
Ya ;3

No. 12004

>>12001
I just reported u for emojis(>:T)

No. 12005

>>11969
Like everything else the mod team probably has transwomen in it. The trans threads have been awful and it's because they have a large presents. So, like the other poster wrote we need a radfem board and hope the trans don't destroy it.

No. 12006

File: 1572042302661.png (319.35 KB, 1027x361, large-present-header[1].png)

>>12005
>they have a large presents.

No. 12007

>>12005
Admin has stated otherwise, although of course those could be lies… how gross to think of a TIM getting his rocks off by being included in the mod team and being shilled as a real female by admin… shudder…

No. 12008

>>12005
>>12007
What the hell is wrong with you people. Like how can you act like this and not understand why the rest of the site hates you.

No. 12009

Are the farmhands watching the Soft Girl/DDLG thread? The name fagging is rampant rn. It's either Erin herself pretending to be various people and not knowing how the site works - or she's sending her followers out to shit up the thread. Can we find out if it's all the same person? It's really suspicious.

>>12008
Agreeing with this anon, ya'll are embarrassing. The majority of this site gives two shits about this.

No. 12010

>>12005
>>12007
reeeee mods r trannies.
here we are again, round and round.

No. 12011

Can we please get the gc thread back? I used to read the gc thread a couple times a month, so might have missed any deleted posts, but i didnt see much trouble at all so im sad and a bit confused to see it gone. Might have been different in the radfem/pinkpill thread, seeing The clustefuck going on now. But i think its a very important topic giving this is a female centric board and it sucks to have to share it with random manhate and the inevitable infighting and handmaids/triggered incels.

No. 12012

>>12011
this is asked all the time and gc/pp anons cant accept no. how many times do you guys have to be told deal before you get it.

No. 12013

>>12011
No go back to r/GenderCritical faggot

No. 12014

>>12011
people like you who don't think GC is the same idea as PP stuff are idiots. no one in the old GC thread was doing anything other than bitching about dangerous males. just because you guys think your opinion is more grounded in science doesn't mean the general user finds it different. no one could even discuss things (like saying that it's possible some of the people are victims) in the GC thread without people reeeing about hating men.

No. 12015

>>12014
You know transmen and NB were discussed often in GC too right? these people are trans too and discussing them was fairly common.

GC and PP aren't the same, discussing gender-related themes and the likes isn't the same as specifically man-hating, this proves you don't even know which were the themes discussed in that thread, you just go for an easy "Nah, is all man-hating".
>like saying that it's possible some of the people are victims
Most trannies whether male or female did all of this out of a fetish/pornsickness (see fujos/sissies), unless they're minors/extremely mentally ill/ gay people you shouldn't feel pity for them especially when they're using harmful stereotypes as costumes.

No. 12016

>>12015
we have a fakeboi thread on /snow/ and now we have a troon thread as well how many threads catering to your topic of interest do you even need. if you wanna discuss the political rammifications and not just laugh or vent about people there's def other sites for you (but you might not like them because they won't be a huge exclusive circlejerk)

No. 12017

>>12008
>>12010
I'm just a regular girl who would feel a little uncomfortable if some guy associated with the janitorial staff is furiously masturbating to this website and using the userbases ignorance to gain inclusion and cummies. Not everyone is reeeing like you and others are kek

No. 12018

>>12017
it's such a stupid tinfoil as if admin didn't say multiple times that mods get verified first

No. 12020

>>12018
Yep that's basically my thought too, as I stated in >>12007, because admin has been kind enough to respond to my inquiries on this matter. Although I was responding to >>12005 so maybe they're the reeeeetard. I don't really participate in the gender/sexuality discussions but I would definitely feel uncomfortable here if those accusations were true. That's all.

No. 12021

File: 1572102099977.gif (506.89 KB, 500x361, retardalert.gif)

>>12005
How many rounds of this shit do we need? We are at round four or five of tinfoiling about "mods r trannies cuz they don't agree w me".

The original admin was a MAN. Ever since then, all mod teams have been exclusively biological women for that reason.
Pic very related.

No. 12023

>>12021
It seems obvious that those who are concerned can never be placated because there is no way to prove anything either way. Maybe just let them cluck amongst themelves and relax a little bit bc you're not going to change any minds anyway. Unless you just want to screech.

No. 12024

>>12017
no one in hell is going to furiously masturbate to anything regarding the site.

No. 12025

Everytime I come here (to make sure there's no any Scat attacks) I see the same conversation after the mods have said over and over and over again, the thread isn't coming back.

it's time to move on.

No. 12026

File: 1572112084838.jpg (34.81 KB, 400x635, 73079397_2730394773646842_8865…)

>>12005

Jesus, this again?

No. 12029

>>12024
I'm not saying it's happening… but being included in staff on a female-only imageboard and being defended as a real woman is like a tranny wet dream but go off…

No. 12030

>>12017
>>12020
>>12023
>>12029
>EVERYONE IS A REEEEETARD EXCEPT FOR ME ALSO ALL THE MODS ARE AGPS MASTUTBATING TO EVERY WORD WE POST AND ADMIN IS ENABLING IT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Nah you are a paranoid fucking freak and so are all the other radfems [on this site]

No. 12033

i don’t get why the advice thread is in /g/ but the vent, confessions, kink shaming threads are in /ot/

not that i think it really matters

No. 12036

>>12033
>/g/ is for all things girly, bathroom talk for advice, lifestyle, fashion, cosmetics, makeup, periodtalk. Anything you would ask and talk about with your female friends.

all those other things are off topic. like i dont care what some idiot in /snow/ thinks of sex workers and dd/lg has to say personally about kinks, so stick it in the off topic board. i wish more anons went into vent to let out their personal gripes about cows so it doesnt crap up the main thread. it makes sense.

/g/ makes sense for advice. a lot of anons ask about relationships or their vagainas or acne or whatever. its not off topic. and frankly, i would rather ask /g/ users about my vagina over the users on /ot/ who, lets be real, never leave it and they begin to rage that i should dump my bf and kill him because i got worried about my pussy or some acne or whatever.

No. 12037

File: 1572136034274.gif (137.51 KB, 300x565, source.gif)

Like this anon >> 12023 said, the possibility that mods are trannies or not it's unverifiable, rads/meta anons should remain neutral and accept both possibilities that the team is all women/there are trannies since both sides have no evidence to backup their statements. Also, meta anons shouldn't just expect others to believe everything mods say blindly, radfags screeching "mods are trans!!!" are annoying but "mods are women cause they said so >:T" is not a compelling reason to mitigate that "tranny mod" theory as "mods are all women" isn't a certain truth since no one can prove it…unless you all bring evidence. You all here just keep repeating "mods are women because they said so" over and over with no evidence in hopes everyone believes it, with verifications no one can prove them happened ("mods said so" doesn't count). If mods are in fact women you shouldn't be SO pressed over people merely mentioning that "trannie mods" theory especially when you can't disprove that yourself.

No. 12038

>>12016
Well in first place i don't know why the fakeboi and transwomen thread are separated imo they should be merged since its just general cringe with no political implication
>but you might not like them because they won't be a huge exclusive circlejerk
You all should stop with these weak ass ad-hominems they're getting stale.

No. 12039

I mean people can't prove the mods ARE transgender, so how come people can't use the only source they have vs. people shouting, "Mods r trannies because they did something I didn't like!" no one has proof.
It's just annoying to have the same conversations, people need to move on create a sit or something where you can have the conversation you want to have. It doesn't seem the mods are budging and calling them trannies won't change that

No. 12043

can mods check the infighting and weirdness in Shaynas thread about fupa?
and the mini modding? It seems to show up strong with Fupa but this time it seems different.

No. 12046

>>12006
posting this wouldve got you a warning in the past. there are too many no personality bored people on the site now. thats why there is no milk. in the past someone who knew a cow would post but you people ran them off. now the site is grammar homebodies.

>>12007 >>12010
i wrote 12005. I didnt know this topic was already addressed. lol. im glad im not the only one who noticed. I had to stop posting milk on a few of them. everytime i posted something I got bashed. even if you dont want the milk how do you bash it. I also stopped posting venus and onision history for the same reason. their fans/haters are trying to rewrite history. but there are other sites with the full history so Ive decided to quit responding over here. i initially got upset when my- my digital escape- milk was treated poorly.

>>12020
Im 12005 and I wrote that in regards to gatekeeping. someone is allowed to bash anyone that doesnt agree with trans issues. as far as fighting this gender war I think everyone need to take up some trade classes. you all need to find jobs.

>>12021
if people can feel the shift then to say they are imagining it is lame. some of those threads arent milky but devoted to defending the trans cows. come on. just like venus stop defending everything. just state your facts.

I wont be responding anymore.

>>12029
its so obvious. I think after being called out the trans has kinda backed off but for almost a year you couldnt criticize at all. everyone felt it and the threads started to suffer because they ran a lot of people away.

No. 12048

>>12046
lol go do something else

No. 12049

>>12048
At this point the anon's angry about this shit could've made their own forum to discuss this shit.

So much time wasted shouting at people who don't give a fuck and aren't going to change it.

No. 12051

There's a ton of race baiting going on in /OT/ especially in the Reddit hate thread (unironically.)

No. 12053

>>12037
This is probably the most logical response but I've verified myself as a female with a timestamp. I'm too wary to mod or even give janitor privileges to randos because if they're not trannies they can also be cows or overly involved farmers. Because of this most of the mods are my close irl friends and any janitors have limited board privileges, even after being verified.

The only issue with this tinfoil is that it's always been a possibility with any board or forum. It's only referenced here because gc anons are still scorned about losing their thread.
There's a reason the same 2-3 anons come here within the span of days to make more tranny janny accusations.

No. 12057

File: 1572298756972.jpeg (61.04 KB, 637x184, EABCF858-113F-4D12-BA4F-E7CC8D…)

There hasn’t been any racebaiting after first warning. There is meat sperging but if discourse is lockable offense then just nuke all of /ot/

No. 12058

>>12057
Prob about the whole "eating any animal is the same" argument since it was related to an Anon saying Asians eat dogs

Would it be alright to remake the thread or whatever and just put the rules at the top/ban specific subreddits from being mentioned??

No. 12059

>>12057
The reddit thread had surprisingly little racebaiting, I'm honestly shocked it got locked.

No. 12060

>>12057
Any discourse about race is banned in /ot/, yet anons continue to discuss which races eat which animals.
The thread was just infighting with no discussion of the actual topic at hand.

No. 12061

>>12060
Really? Most of the thread was people talking shit about reddit posts/redditors, the racial shit only happened very briefly. I get that rules are rules, but I don't see why the entire thread should be nuked because a few people couldn't contain their faggotry.

No. 12062

>>12060
Factual statements about cultural cuisine isn't racebaiting

No. 12063

>>12062
Any discussion of race, racebait or not is prohibited in /ot/.
You would know that if you read the sticky.

No. 12064

The gender critical autists have spread into ot/ Tinfoil… do they think they’re doing some kind of evangelical redfem mission work? Don’t they have their own holes of the internet they can dribble bullshit into?

No. 12065

>>12064
Those are two tinfoil posts, and they belong in the tinfoil thread.
Just because you don't like the opinion shared doesn't mean it doesn't belong, especially since it's not even weird racebait or anything like that.
I think the Pizzagate stuff is retarded, but guess what? I ignore it, because the thread itself is for conspiracy theories and tinfoils. Grow up.

No. 12066

>>12065
>They belong in the tinfoil thread.
No they don't. You guys are supposed to keep that shit in your containment thread.

>>12064
Remember to report radfem derailing outside the pinkpill thread when you see it, even on /ot/.

No. 12067

>>12066
>you guys
I've complained about radfems multiple times though? It's just retarded to ban conspiracy theories when that's what they are. Autists thinking everything is a wild scheme.

No. 12068

Sorry to bother but the Projared thread is becoming pretty unreadable lately. Every time it gets bumped there is no milk and it's just anons arguing back and forth about what if Jared isn't so bad/what if Heidi is worse, etc. and reposting old milk.

No. 12069

>>12067
radfem and gender shit belongs in pink pill and nowhere else. how hard is it to follow this one simple rule? do you guys seriously think about nothing else? is everything just troons with you freaks? radfems are unbearable and single handedly ruined /ot/

No. 12072

>>12069
Honest question, do you even read posts before replying? I'm not a radfem, I've literally been annoyed and reported their autism. I even said that in the very first sentence of my post.
If you need someone to bitch at, try the actual GC spergs who've been trying to get the threads unmerged above.
You don't look any less autistic than them by mindlessly screaming at anyone who doesn't praise every single action the farmhands take. You just look like a hivemind sperg.

No. 12073

>>12072
i honestly have no idea what you're even talking about but you need to take this site less seriously

No. 12074

>>12073
You say that, but then post shit like >>12069?
It's a no from me. Take your own advice pls.

No. 12075

It would be great if the Plastic and Proud thread could have a ban on armchair diagnosing her rash and armchair litigating her statements about having been raped in the Dominican.

No. 12076

Thanks for unlocking the Reddit Hate thread, hopefully it doesn't fall apart again.

No. 12080

Are we not caring about the minors posted in the gimp lady's thread because there's just no hope for any offspring of that woman, or what? I mean, she posted them herself, but she's also sick as fuck in the head.
I reported it a while ago now. Poor things.

No. 12081

>>12067
lol one of the mods is always in here sperging about radfems. I was last here 2 weeks ago, same thing. Then before that. If you disagree with the mod stance you're a radfem. No matter what. It's prob the tranny mod. Seeing terven everywhere lmao

>>12069
dilate

Anyway have you guys considered that not all the women sperging about gender issues and trannys are radfems? Or even gender critical? But good luck. Keep banning everyone for the slightest reasons. Your site is thriving.

No. 12082

>>12081
Have you guys considered that not all the women sperging about retardo radfems like you are trannys? Or even pro trans? Take a bath and get some fucking self awareness.

No. 12083

>>12082
You need to calm down, this is just a forum full of strangers

No. 12084

>>12080
I haven't been following the thread closely but I'm confused as to why the sister's IG had been redacted? Was she a minor? When I caught a glimpse of her IG before the link was taken down it looked like no minor to me..

But the pictures of the kids definitely need a blur or censor over them or something. It's not their fault their birthmother is a deluded psycho.

No. 12085

>>12083
Anon… I'm not the one whose been sperging about the mods being trannies day in and day out all over the site like a paranoid schizophrenic just because they made a decision I don't agree with. Again, get some self awareness.

No. 12086

>>12085
This is what I mean. I'm not even the person you're freaking out at.
You sound mentally ill, get some fresh air.

No. 12088

>>12083
this is not a forum.

No. 12090

>>12088
Lolcow is an imageboard. Do you know what an imageboard is?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imageboard
>An imageboard is a type of Internet forum that revolves around the posting of images, often alongside related text and discussion

No. 12091

is there anything that can be done about the absolutely insane amount of samefagging, hi-cowing, infighting and autism that is the miranda thread?? i mean seriously it reads as though the same 5 people are just talking in circles for the last two years.

No. 12093

>>12091
that’s just how lolcow is

No. 12094

can we get some temporary bans for the animal sperging in shay's threads? unless it's milky, mentioning the cat or dog shouldn't be necessary and now it's devolved into dumb shit like "how dare she feed them dry food" and "uwu i need to make sure that lil angel is okay!".

No. 12095

>>12090
ntas but y are you like.. that? are you on the spectrum for real? lots of radfems are

No. 12097

>>12091
are you fucking new?

No. 12098

Some tranny sperg has breached the GC containment thread and is causing a ruckus in ot.

No. 12099

>>12098
It actually seems to be one of the GC spergs stirring the pot again, not a real tranny. I'll give warning bans to the idiots who took that obvious bait.
>inb4 t. tranny mod

>>12094
Yeah we can crack down on the pet sperging in there.

No. 12100

Out of curiosity, will /pt/ ever get more clearly defined requirements? Been on this site for a million years and I've just watched it make less and less sense. Why do /pt/ cows get permanent tenure long after their milk has dried up when there are cows in /snow/ and /w/ that are on like, thread #20? Seems like when cows reach >5 threads they should be automatically moved to /pt/ or something.

Like, in /pt/ the Sheena Duquette thread previous to the current one took 2+ years to fill up. Current thread is 9 months old and just reached 300 posts, with months of nothing in between. The (one) Fahr Sindram thread is 4 years old and still hasn't filled up, Jessica Yaniv thread never even got vetted in /snow/ and was just allowed to start and stay in /pt/ but is already pretty stagnant. At the very least shouldn't Sheena and Fahr move to /w/? And then in /snow/ you've got active threads like Baylee Jae (Thread #9), ProJared/Holly/GG (Thread #14), Holly Brown (Thread #19), etc etc. Just not sure what the logic is.

(I also still dream of the return of /manure/ to clean out all of the spam/shit threads from the catalogues and some sort of archive board where maxed out threads go so it's only fresh current threads…but I know that's a pipe dream)

No. 12101

>>12097
not at all, so i’m aware that fuck all will ever be done about the dumpster fire status of half the threads in /pt, especially mira’s when it’s very obvious that it is the same handful of people posting. anything admin does would probably just aggravate the spergs anyway. like an anon above me said the criteria is all fucked anyway.

No. 12103

>>12100
/pt/ isn't about activity. you should look at it as a kind of hall of fame for cows. basically, a cow does something so stupid/funny/fucked up that they get moved to /pt/ and stay there because they've proven themselves to be an unredeemable idiot.
a lot of super active /snow/ threads are full of nitpicking, infighting, minimodding and hardly anything interesting going on.
also i'm sure it'd be a shit ton of work to constantly move people back and forth to /pt/ and /snow/ based on the thread activity not to mention it'd be confusing for us as users as well.
momokun is still on /pt/ despite her thread content being /snow/ level of retarded nitpicking but she's proven herself to be a super idiot. what anons need to learn how to do is to let cows die out. if they don't do interesting or funny shit anymore then just don't post about them. constantly ranting about how their nasolabial folds and boobs sag or whatever just attracts unhinged people from PULL with insecurity issues who then make the whole board feel more hostile and crazy than it was before.

No. 12104

>>12084
>>12080
Any response to this? Or do the male tranny mods not have any innate compassion for children? Kekeke jk…………….

No. 12105

File: 1572797076885.png (59.77 KB, 648x247, Screen Shot 10.png)

>>12103
>you should look at it as a kind of hall of fame for cows
Right, but I'm saying this makes zero sense. A "Hall of Fame" implies a purely archival sense, not an active one. You don't go to the Baseball Hall of Fame and go "well he retired 20 years ago but we're still waiting for him to set some new Baseball records so we can talk about it", which is what you're implying /pt/ is for. Besides isn't that what /cream/ was supposed to be for?

>a cow does something so stupid/funny/fucked up that they get moved to /pt/ and stay there because they've proven themselves to be an unredeemable idiot

That's literally the requirement of creating a thread for any cow in the first place, or have you never read the rules? You're making it sounds like /snow/ is some triage board where people are given a chance to redeem themselves and if they're a lost cause then they move to /pt/, like it's hospice care or something. If they're not an unredeemable idiot in the first place they wouldn't warrant 5+ threads? Dolly Mattel is on thread #42 in /snow/, how many threads does she get to prove that she may still be redeemable? 100? The Game Grumps threads date back to 2015 (how I found lolcow in the first place), how does that not count as a "Hall of Fame"?

No. 12106

>>12080
>>12104
The rules on minors are
>Do not make threads on subjects under the age of 16.
>Do not post identifiable information on minors such as full names, addresses and schools.
>Do not post photos of minors where there is an expectation of privacy.
So it should be fine to post pics that merely include them from time to time as long as you don't post pics of them that were supposed to be private or start sperging specifically about them ala the onion anons.

>>12084
Her sister's IG may have been redacted because posting family members who are unrelated to the dramu is against the rules.

No. 12107

>>12105
no but /snow/ is for threads where cows have to prove themselves consistently milky enough. also again it'd be such a mess to have threads constantly moving back and forth. a lot of the rules have slightly changed over time the standard set of rules is like what? almost 5 years old now? you can't take them so literally. why even care? shits the way it is

No. 12108

>>12106
>don't post pics of them that were supposed to be private
Those kids really are SOL in that case because that gimp lady doesn't give a fuck

No. 12109

File: 1572813040801.png (11.89 KB, 547x109, rules.png)

>>12107
>the standard set of rules is like what? almost 5 years old now?
>you can't take them so literally
You really can't read huh bud. They're not an ancient out of date dusty tome, they're literally updated all the time. If they aren't meant to be taken at face value then how can they be enforced?

>no but /snow/ is for threads where cows have to prove themselves consistently milky enough

Right, so explain to me how a cow that's on their 42nd thread hasn't proven themselves "consistently milky enough", but Fahr Sindram who hasn't produced enough milk for one full thread in 4 years has? Explain why Lillee Jean got upgraded to /pt/ on her 3rd thread, but Jillian Vessey is on her #34th in /w/? Explain why Jessica Yaniv didn't have to go through /snow/ at all? You can't just say those are the rules when they're not actually followed in any case. There's just no rhyme or reason to any of it.

>why even care? shits the way it is

Because it makes the website worse, and it doesn't have to be? /snow/ and /w/ are so overrun with the same ~5 cows on their 20+ thread constantly being shoved to the front that none of the hundred other threads get any breathing room. /pt/ is nothing but breathing room because it's just a graveyard for Greg and Momo threads and cows from 5+ years ago that are just tumbleweeds at this point. I don't know where you "constantly moving threads back and forth" from, I'm literally talking about a handful of dead threads that have been stagnant for years trading places with a handful of threads that are bursting at the seams. /snow/ and /w/ are breaking fire codes and overflowing with milk, and /pt/ is an empty club with a bouncer turning everyone away for not being hot enough but letting boring uggos and old women stay in there for years only ordering water

No. 12110

>>12109
alright i'm not reading this. have fun being mad about this though i guess

No. 12111

Do the rules against vendetta, samefagging, sperg/spam, necro and milkless posts only count for /pt/? There’s just so much of it in /snow/ and /w/ but i dont see bans happen unless someone makes a shit tier thread.

No. 12112

>>12111
snow and w are basically like "pre-pt" forums. there's probably going to be a couple vendettas and necros because they sound interesting enough to be considered a cow at first. i'm sure majority of personal lolcows are vendettas/samefags, but it's basically a containment thread. sperg/spam and necro, though i def agree. so much non milk and bumping for dumb ass reasons.

No. 12113

Can something be done about the Goth sperg in the Altcow thread? They show up all the time trying to detail and dictate the rules of being Goth or whatever (and they have a very recognizable way of speaking) and it's shitting up the thread, they're being called out on it now but I doubt it's gonna stop anytime soon.

No. 12114

just want to tell admin and everyone to keep up the good work!

No. 12115

It's already the 5th or 6th time I get banned for trying to post a reply to a thread. The reply doesn't even go through, I just get btfo'd on click. Can someone explain why?

No. 12116

>>12115
Are you sure the ban is expired? Post a photo of the ban in question.

No. 12117

>>12116
I've never taken a screenshot, it just says I'm banned. Then after 24 hours it's back to normal.

No. 12118

might need to take a new approach for necessary4speed. Red texting all their stuff is just giving them the attention they probably crave, it's practically namefagging at this point.

No. 12119

>>12118
she's namefagging fine on her own with her typing style and subjects. same happened with keith

No. 12120

>>12105
I'm super late but imagine thinking Shay has done anything /pt/worthy. She's an alco with boils on her pussy who doesn't walk her dog. Just because anons nitpick their way to high thread volume, it's not an indicator. Sheena is boring as hell these days but she pretty much did kill someone then spent her payout on a tit job. The difference is in the scale of what they've done.

No. 12121

Can a mod please go into the alt-cows thread and calm down the race infighting?

No. 12122

>>12120
Then go to the PT request page on PT. You don't like who is on the catalog then mention others in the suggestion thread.

No. 12123

thanks to the farmhand in the ddlg thread

No. 12124

the cow recommendation thread in /snow/ should be moved to /ot/.

No. 12125

>>12124
lmao what
Why would a catalog-like thread about cows be in /ot/?

No. 12126

>>12125
why shouldn't a discussion thread that isn't based on any specific cow(s) be in a place for known cows? why not just already use the catalog that is easily accessible in the first place?

No. 12127

>>12122
anon I'm not complaining about who's on what board, perhaps you meant another comment

>>12124
Do you mean the Personal Cows thread?

No. 12128

>>12127
no, it's a thread where anons suggest cows for different anons.

No. 12129

Just noticed that I got a temp ban a couple of days ago for a post I wrote 2 months ago. What was the point of that?

No. 12130

>>12129
Sometimes people report old posts and going through the report queue you don't always notice the date. I apologize, I agree that there's no point to it. It was an accident.

No. 12131

>>12128
that thread is on /pt/ tho, lol.

No. 12132

This is the second time I've gotten banned for something twice.

thankfully after an hour my ban was removed, but why does this happen?

Thanks to the person who read my appeal, but this isn't the first time I was banned for the same comment Days later.

Once I was banned for something I said 3 days ago, and I was already banned for.

And today, I got an 6 hour ban from all forums for a comment i made and was banned for on the 3rd.

No. 12133

>>11760
Can we please get some bans in the Plasticandproud thread? Some newfag is clogging up the thread and I've reported them several times.

No. 12134

what types of bans aren't redtexted?

No. 12136

does the ddlg/nymphlet/soft girl thread’s “shit thread” status mean there’s no moderation whatsoever?

No. 12137

>>12136
no? it just means that the OP is shit

No. 12138

>>12136
I think OP is asking because the thread is a dumpster fire of DDLG girls fighting and cowtipping.

No. 12139

>>12138
exactly

No. 12140

>>12136
it needs to be put on autosage

No. 12141

Can that cinawol person please be banned fr the ddlg thread? They're just infighting for misreading a comment, and now won't shut the fuck up about who they are.

No. 12143

>>12140
Agree. No one in that thread knows how to sage and the DDLG girls are all infighting and cowtipping. No one cares about 'sfw agere'.

No. 12144

>>12143
this. i personally like laughing at ageplayers, petplayers and ddlg so i don't care about whatever vague bs they're trying to defend their particular bs with.

No. 12145

>>12100

>Why do /pt/ cows get permanent tenure long after their milk has dried up


Qualifying as a /pt/ level cow is not a bell that can be unrung.

One of the prime qualities of a /pt/ level cow is that they will return with prime milk after months or even years, and the milk is usually an entirely new drama. Fahr is a good example.

>>12109

>Right, so explain to me how a cow that's on their 42nd thread hasn't proven themselves "consistently milky enough"


Are you deliberately being obtuse?

Full threads and high activity are not a measure of milk. The number of threads and the activity level of a thread is determined simply by the number of posts.

Look at the The Laur and Lillee Jean thread. It was moved to /p/ after only a few threads and only a few months because of the quality of the milk and the quality of the. The farmers in that thread stay on topic, avoid nitpicking, have dug deep into their milky pasts, and bring the receipts.

>>12103

This. The current Raven thread is a good example of farmers exercising restraint in nitpicking and ignoring her until she reemerged. I didn't even finish posting the transcript of her last farewell video, and I stopped posting about the changes she kept making to her accounts because it became an obvious game to her.

No. 12146

is the gc/pp thread on autosage?

No. 12148

The Onision thread has a bunch of moralfagging and blogposting in defense if Plainey. Could just be one person pretending to be multiple people but it seems to be increasing, as well as the unsaged posts.

No. 12149

>>12146
No, someone needs to make a new thread.

No. 12153

Can I get a response to a 3.1 violation on /snow/?

No. 12157

Now the DDLG girls turned a thread about them into a thread solely focused on Erin >>>/snow/891485 . Don't get me wrong, Erin deserves to be mocked, but they're just salty she's copying other ddlg girls as if the entire "community" wasn't a complete cringe fest.

They're only three posts in and the thread has already been shoved to the front by some brainlet who doesn't know how to sage. Pls put it on autosage.

No. 12159

>>12157
Why the fuck would you want a thread made about a milky cow put on autosage. There's literally no reason for it to be. Erin's been the sole reason the ddlg thread has been at the forefront of snow recently, it only makes sense for her to have a thread solely dedicated to her.

No. 12160

Can something be done about the cowtipper in the PnP thread? I’ll report the individual comments but it’s getting annoying since they’re starting to infight.

No. 12161

>>12160
And the cowtippers in the Onision thread. Staff seems pretty quiet. I hope things are alright?

No. 12162

>>12153
Sorry to bother y'all but the DOX is still showing up on Google search cache. Anyway this can be altered? Thanks in advance.

No. 12164

Twitterfags have found out about their thread on snow and now its gone full retard in there.

No. 12165

>>12162
Just had to clear the cache on my end, cheers. T. Idiot

No. 12166

While I do believe Erin is a milky snowflake skinwalking cow, there are so many retards in her thread. I don't think it should be autosaged, because they don't even understand how sage works and won't understand the punishment. Can we get a farmhand in there to lay out the problems because I feel a urge to sperg about the rules but I'm not trying to minimod and get in trouble.

They are repeating posts, not saging, someone posted their email address ffs, and, of course, you can tell it's full of ddlg chicks totally defending agere or whatever, not realizing that farmers find that shit disgusting.

The newfags are spoiling the milk, please help. I feel like all the real farmers are abandoning the thread as it descends into newfaggotry hell and thats such a loss of potential enjoyable milk. It's so wasteful.

No. 12169

some assblasted sperg is posting scat and assorted autism in /g

No. 12170

thanks for deleting scat and assorted autism in /g/

No. 12171

>>12166
I think Erin's interesting as a subject, I do love a catfish. but it's so fucking retarded how her threads are being handled:

thread 1 ~ locked by staff till anons could prove she's milky >>>/snow/849255

thread 2 ~ e-girls thread >>>/snow/866800
e-girls in thread decide "muh thread quality" would improve if Erin was moved to her own thread, thread is now wall to wall newfaggotry

thread 3 ~ Soft Girl/Ddlg/Nymphets general really just a vehicle for Erin at time of its creation, op is a retard "someone had to do it!" aka the cry of the newfag >>>/snow/879341
ddlgfags in thread decide "muh thread quality" would improve if Erin was moved to her own thread, now they can nitpick each other's bodies in peace uwu

thread 4 ~ second standalone thread for Erin instead of requesting >>>/snow/849255 unlocked. the cycle of Erin autism continues

No. 12172

I know staff have policed this in the past but can we have a bit of fresh scrutiny of newfag Onision threads? The main offender being threads where they don't update the milk at all but just copy-paste the whole lot, change 1 link and the thread number/title and call it done

This new one is bad >>>/pt/728877
I've written up the milk for them here to try and fix the problem >>>/pt/728931

They think having a thread at all hours of the day is more important than documenting the milk a la the tempfags. Onision threads have a bit more happening right now with Chris Hansen involved and documentation is important.

No. 12173

>>12166
>>12171

I agree that she's interesting but mods should really work at handling the influx of newfags, especially the obvious vendetta ddlgfags. The 'erin is dead' post to me smells of cowtipping.

No. 12174

>>12164
Yeah that thread is basically unreadable right now. I’m hoping it will calm down eventually. Every other post is just some twitterfag whining about the thread existing. Any normal person would just not look at the thread instead of continuing to bump it, but I guess onion’s shadow fans don’t have enough brain cells to spare for that kind of logic.

No. 12176

>>12171
I disagree that >>>/snow/849255 should have been unlocked. The current milk isn't current, it has her old usernames, the picture sucks, it doesn’t contain her more recent shenanigans

I’m not sure if that was your thread or something since you keep linking to it

No. 12177

>>12176
like why reactivate the mediocre outdated thread when you can just make a new one

No. 12179

Can a mod please ban the "I'm a guy" whiteknight in Erin'a thread please? I wouldn't be surprised if it was Erin herself, but they keep samefagging and whiteknighting her and it's ridiculous. I feel like the thread could be good if mods went through and just banned a few people. Erin's got a lot of milk but there's a severe lack of integrating.

No. 12180

>>12179
Seconded

No. 12181

>>12179
Thirding, there needs to be some intense banning in there to teach the newfags how to integrate. They are running wild, I posted >>12166 and they somehow made the thread even worse, I'm fucking astounded. It's the worse I've ever seen a thread, personally. I hope farmhands/admin address the situation at the very least.

No. 12184

At this point the Onision threads are entirely self promo for anti-o twitter accounts, or their YouTube videos. What can we do about this? Is there anything?

No. 12185

Autism in the Erin thread, again.

No. 12186

>no admin post in 17 days
where were u wen admin was kill

No. 12187

>>729646
Can we please ban the trend of "unshooping" fat girls (Momokun)? When one anon does it, another handful of anons start posting their shitty shops and clogging up the threads. Nobody looks at these and it's just another way of saying "haha she's fat."

HDR-ing Onision/Lainey pics was banned and this feels like the same kind of thing. Editing a cow's pic so that they can uncover more details to nitpick.

No. 12188

There’s some pedophile defending himself in /OT online child grooming.

No. 12189

We need a mod to add into.Moos description, since dumbass snons keep removing it, that the mids have already stated that nitpicking needs to stop for the following and that it was instant bans:

Pedosperg, tit nitpicking (color, veins, medfagging about them, sagginess), medfagging in general, taxsperg, weightsperging, animal abuse

Like fuck. The unsaging anons wont sage. We never even got a mod to address the unsaging.

No. 12190

>>12187
Please. I agree with this. We get milk has been sorta slow, not going through 5 threads in one week anymore, but these unsaging newfag anons literally do nothing to add to the thread.

No. 12191

The anti Onision thread is a fucking dumpster fire of retardation and newfaggotry, how has it not been locked?

No. 12192

>>12187
Aw I love the un-shoops

No. 12193

>>12191
I think it's more of a containment thread to keep the anti-o rants out of the main thread. Just report what you think is a problem. The mods are clearly watching the thread based on the recent red text.

No. 12194

>>12193

It has turned into shitshow of vendetta posting by someone wking that cow Mikenactor, it’s not even about “anti-o” fags anymore

No. 12195

>>12194
Then report it or ask a mod to step in? They're all a bunch of cows and if it gets locked then it'll just return to the main thread again.

No. 12196

i would love to see erin's full post history

No. 12198

>>12195
>if it gets locked then it'll just return to the main thread again.

They shouldn’t be on lolcow in general, not until they learn the board’s culture and rules. They should have been banned and told to stay on topic without adding that they could make a thread in /snow/. They can keep their retarded Twitter beef on twitter.

No. 12199

>>12198
>not until they learn the board’s culture and rules.

Completely agree and it's becoming obvious who the newfags are with all the direct linking, tinfoiling to hell, cowtipping, talking about their feelings, text walling and not saging. Those all fall under what not to do. The mods seem to be handling it, but the new people still don't seem to be listening.

No. 12203

The Onision thread has been going off-topic in various directions ever since the site became available again.

No. 12204

>>12199

Exactly, it’s not even milky, half the retards mentioned in the thread aren’t even “anti Onision”, they’re just loudmouths. I understand wanting to drag the autists who do stupid shit like cowtipping or think they’re lawyers but no one cares about ss of irrelevant tweets

No. 12206

The alt cow thread is a mess. No one is posting images except of Kaya, but will mention other people with no screen shots. why do people keep forgetting this is an image board

No. 12208

There's way too much to report but the new kpop critical thread is filled with race bait and infighting/Stan wars and way too much tinfoil and I feel like it's spilling into the other boards/threads.

No. 12210

The rape debate in the unpopular opinions thread should be in the PP thread, it's been going on for way too long.

No. 12212

>>12193
The mods here don't even know board culture

No. 12213

>>12212
The 200x banned fags war cry

No. 12216

>>12213
I am crying too, I thought saging posts wouldn't hurt a thread but why did I get a red text for this: >>>/pt/723678??? I am pretty sure you can just hide saged posts, and I see no point in redtexting it much later, I thought admin agreed that it was weird too.
>>12210
and too shit.

Also, why is moo's thread 100% just nitpicking now and when I make an awkward post it gets redtexted? I mean at least I saged.

No. 12217

>>12216
It's been removed. Sorry about that. A tip though, if you don't want to bump a thread don't post pictures. Pictures will bump the thread regardless of sage.

No. 12218

>>12217
While you're here farmhand, would you mind telling the newfags to integrate and chill on the maximum tinfoil in the Onision thread?

No. 12219

>>12217
Oh damn. Any way for it to be still saged because I really didn't ever notice this, sorry.

No. 12220

>>12069
I’m in complete agreement. This site has become flooded with bitter radfems moaning about their hatred for the male species and derailing every conversation to complain about trannies. It’s annoying and pathetic.

No. 12221

>>11760
can something be done about the "TND Rape Debate"? People can't prove or disprove it and it has nothing to do with anything going on.

Plus it's kind of gross, not like Taylor (to my knowledge) brought up her rape & even if she did, again, we can't disprove or prove it.

No. 12222

>>12221
Literally came here for this too, every time someone says she wasn’t raped because reasons that rely on rape myths, I rage. We don’t know what happened, and that’s fucking that. The milk has nothing to do with it but it comes up unrelated every now and again and inevitably people bring up their shitty reasons for deciding she’s lying.

No. 12223

>>12220
>>12221
>>12222
Can we just get a hellweek? It seems like a bunch of threads could use it and it might dial back the newfags that don't want to integrate.

Or maybe a cough from admin to let us know that she's still alive?

No. 12224

>>12223
I agree but current farmhands/admins do nothing about infighting and unnecessarily hostile anons cause they think it's normal. I think people even speculated that some of the people causing it may be a farmhand, especially in OT. But that's all people speculating so idk. We should have had one MONTHS ago. We need a hellmonth at this point.

No. 12225

>>12223
I agree but current farmhands/admins do nothing about infighting and unnecessarily hostile anons cause they think it's normal. I think people even speculated that some of the people causing it may be a farmhand, especially in OT. But that's all people speculating so idk. We should have had one MONTHS ago. We need a hellmonth at this point.

No. 12226

>>12223
I agree but current farmhands/admins do nothing about infighting and unnecessarily hostile anons cause they think it's normal. I think people even speculated that some of the people causing it may be a farmhand, especially in OT. But that's all people speculating so idk. We should have had one MONTHS ago. We need a hellmonth at this point.

No. 12227

Almost the entirety of the new Onion thread is just anons responding to the bait.

No. 12231

>>12220
they already got booted anon. admin and farmhands have done the most to make them feel unwelcome. it takes time.

No. 12232

>>12227
It was like that in the last thread too.

No. 12233

Can we get some kind of warning in the Onision thread from staff to make people behave or integrate? It's jumping all over the place and anons attacking each other for saying the slightest negative thing about the women involved, falling for bait, so many hi cow accusations, retarded tinfoils, people not saging, newfags all over the place, you name it and its been happening for more than two weeks now. I do see mods red texting but they haven't given the usual warning when things get out of hand.

No. 12236

PNP's new thread is full of implant illness sperging already and infighting.

mods pls

No. 12237

>>12223
I second this, anon. Chan ettiquete isn't hard, and I feel like last hellweek was somewhat effective in quelling newfaggotry.

No. 12238

>>12236
Seconding this. I wouldn’t care if it was mentioned once or twice in passing, but they’re literally sperging about who is and isn’t right when NONE OF US (not even ariana lmao) know anything for sure.

No. 12239

File: 1574525366774.jpg (219.75 KB, 800x1149, 20191123_080905.jpg)

Does anyone know why this happens?

No. 12240

>>12239
you have hide saged posts checked

No. 12241

>>12240
No way? Fucking really? Hahaha, thanks anon. What a coconut I am.

No. 12243

Can a mod please address unsaging in moos thread holy fucking shit the dumbass shit thats not saged and not milky in the slightest like opinions

No. 12244

>>12243
Same thing in the Onision thread. I think it's every active pt thread at this point.

No. 12246

Can we please start handing out bans to the fucking newfags? I swear to God every thread has 20 autists not saging their stupid bullshit. Momos thread is full of them especially. Can we maybe get a banner made that says "SAGE YOUR POSTS" ffs, so many anons have told people to sage but they're still going off.

No. 12247

Wasn't the Develv thread confirmed to be like 50% samefag and them selfposting?

No. 12248

>>12247

Jesus, a lot of us read it. Farmers get so paranoid, instead of pointing and laughing like we're supposed to.

No. 12249

File: 1574681392155.jpeg (333.89 KB, 1143x928, 1544388490603.jpeg)


No. 12250

>>12248
I'm starting to wonder if it's actually the sisters themselves coming here and insisting their thread is all selfposting or samefagging hoping that they can get it banned that way.
They're probably not smart enough for that though

No. 12251

>>12250

That's a really great tinfoil. If they wrote something of any length, they'd be pretty easy to spot. >>12247 is a little ESL for something so short, but it's not purple enough to be the girls. It'll be entertaining to internally tinfoil over this for many comments to come, though.

No. 12252

>>12247
Now why did you have to rile up the 2 develv spergs again? Ignore them until their thread finally dies.

No. 12253

Can we please have hellweek for christmas, snow and w is riddled with newfaggotry.

No. 12254

also people were racebaiting in gendercrit thread AGAIN

No. 12255

>>12253
This would be the greatest gift.

No. 12258

>>12250
>>12251
A lot of posters got banned in the last thread because there was a lot of random thinly veiled compliments towards them.

No. 12261

>>12246
Seriously. PT threads should probably have active mods just for that board, not managing other boards. PT is always active with something a lot of the time and the amount of unsaging is so irritating at this point and we aren't even allowed to tell people to sage if they dont know because then its mini modding. Like wtf are we supposed to do then when nothing is being done about them? Mods aren't even addressing it in threads.

I dont get why we dont just autosage PT again or just remove saging in there all together so we dont have to worry about this shit again. WHY was it even stopped? Makes no sense.

No. 12262

>>12261
Yeah it feels like there’s no moderation atm whatsoever.
As others have already mentioned, the Moo and Onision threads are especially bad with all the unsaged bullshit and newfags.
+1 vote for a christmas hellweek

No. 12263

>>12262
Agreed. Staff has stepped in twice in the past week in the Onision thread which is better than before which was not doing so for a month or so. They were pretty active when Sarahgate happened and it would be nice if they were active on pt again. The amount of newfags willing to sage and trying to make moral stands on a site like this is fucking crazy. There was an autistic argument yesterday over someone saying that they saged when they didn't and refused to believe that they didn't sage.

Tuna has a ton of artfags clogging up up the thread. Laur and Lillee's thread clearly has new people who just want a place to vent (understandable) but lurk more or integrate. Lack of sage is all over pt. I'm not going to pretend like I didn't slip up and act retarded, but these threads are getting so much worse when many people are acting like it.

No. 12264

>>12262
>>12263
Christmas hellweek has my vote as well.
Pt is ripe with newfaggotry. In the onision thread people don't sage their shit, no integration and there's derailing over pronouns and other things.
Not saying nothing's been done but this is just exhausting.

No. 12265

The confessions thread is full of race autism again

No. 12266

>>12249
i remember first admin saying that sage should be done with lower case, so that's ironic that screencap. (jokes on me if it changed)

No. 12267

>>12253
Another vote for Christmas hellweek here.
/snow/ and /w/ are just being destroyed by newfags who won't listen and won't integrate. Board culture is slipping away, it feels like. They treat this place like they are leaving a comment on Instagram or YouTube, it's so annoying. Keep board culture alive, please.

No. 12269

Yo, what the fuck with the revenge threat getting locked?? I agree the op was milky and sociopathic, but what the fuck are the mods, 16 year old retards? What the hell, can't we have a thread where we talk about fuckers who hurt us and what we did in consequence and share those sort of experiences?? In a fucking gossip focused imageboard, whose main aim is to discuss shit people and make fun of them???????? Are you for fucking real?

No. 12270

>>12269
Like really, /g/ and /ot/ are full of anons sharing god awful experiences of abuse and fucked up shit. I don't really think I'd hurt to have a thread where we talk about what we did in response towards those sort of situations to defend ourselves for a change.

No. 12271

>>12269
It devolved into infighting and none of what you say was happening in there. It was people moralfagging and arguing about adoption. Also you sound fucking insufferable and type like a 16 year old retard so bit ironic of you to call the mods that

No. 12273

>>12267 og hellweek asker here, all this and the fucking emoji usage, no one reads the rules at all.

No. 12274

Someone do something about the sperging on kelly eden thread right now, it's a shitshow

No. 12276

>>12253
Please. It’s becoming a desperate situation

No. 12279

>>12278
From the looks of it we are being invaded bye a whole bunch of kids today. Probably because most schools are out for the week now. Nothing can stop them at this point.

No. 12280

>>12276
It's already being planned out along with the yearly cow awards.
>>12263
There are constantly bans in that thread. The only issue is the high newfag turnover rate at the moment.

If there is a particular post or something going on, report it instead of complaining here if you want us to see it faster. We've been noticing a decline in reports and it makes things harder on our end.

No. 12283

I support another hellweek but it doesn't necessarily have to be on/near Christmas. I assume the mods have like. Families and stuff to tend to at that time.

Idk maybe I'm autistic and people just meant "for Christmas" as a way of jokingly calling it a gift.

No. 12284

>>12283
Definitely mods shouldn't spend their holidays wrangling newfags, agreed. It was more of a present joke.

No. 12285

>>12283
>>12284
Thanks for being considerate guys but regardless of how many mods we have there will always be an influx of winter and summerfags. More mods are better so we can all distribute the weight of the work during the seasons.

No. 12286

I know things are crazy, but you mods are doing a great job! I hope everyone has a happy thanksgiving and eats lots.

No. 12287

Just wanted to mention a heads-up for the Onision thread and the board overall, Chris Hansen mentioned lolcow so shit could get more crazy

No. 12288

Can someone please do something about the lack of sage in the Moo thread lately. I keep reporting it but it doesn’t seem like anything ever happens as the presumably same dumbass(es) keep(s) doing it.

No. 12289

I wish people who constantly shit up a thread by complaining about the thread's quality or calling for its banishment would get banned. This is far more annoying than regular low quality newfag/underage posts (you can simply ignore those).
Why not just hide the thread if you don't like it?

No. 12291

sperging about feminism and pp in the confessions thread

No. 12292

Someone(anons?) in the animecore thread keeps shitting up the thread with responding to posts separately without sageing. i don't know if it's the same anon who keeps getting red texted.

No. 12293

>>12246
the lack of sage in heather sparkles thread is criminal

No. 12294

The kpop critical thread is under some retard fire and is more unreadable than usual with the no sage and infighting (that is pretty much samefagging). Please send help.

No. 12295

>>12294
This, I suspect it's ratmies because every time people tell them to stop infighting they call them exo 'eggs', whatever the fuck that means.

No. 12296

>>12295 It's fucking insane rn, not one to whine about the topics there but the blind screeching with no milk sans sage ft. Dumb gifs. I am tired.

No. 12297

pink pill bait in the Kpop thread

No. 12300

Can the retarded infighting in the "annoying thread" please be stopped? Every time someone mentions weight or tit size

No. 12301

The situation on /pt/ is getting out of hand.
Why make saging even possible if barely anyone uses it anymore anyways and nobody seems to care.

No. 12302

>>12289
The point of someone being int he thread is that they want to read whats in the thread you dumbass. Why would they hide a thread they follow just to hide it because shit newfags don't read the rules. Don't think you can come here just to bitch about people bitching about saging when the rest of the anons who do sage know how to work the goddamn site, unlike you. Stop shitting up threads and maybe anons might stop harassing you to sage your bullshit tinfoil/medchair/fat/useless/non-milk posts

No. 12303

>>12301
Seriously. Make the whole thing unsagable again or some shit. This reverting back, but not modding the unsaging did no one favors.

No. 12305

>>12302
she's talking about people who go into threads and say "this sucks, not milky, just shut the thread down". those people are thinly veiled white knights.

No. 12308

>>12301
sincere question but why do you guys give a fuck? especially if you'd rather have no sage at all? what about not saging triggers you this much?

No. 12310

>>12308
I'm curious about this too. Why does sageing mater that much to where there are multiple posts about it every day shitting up most threads?
Besides the obvious reason of bumping the thread or not, who fucking cares.
I guess it depends on how you prefer to navigate the site because if you just bookmark the threads and check them periodically it doesn't matter if a thread is bumped but if you navigate using the respective front pages of each board too see which threads are active it would matter. I hope that makes sense. The endless mini-modding is tiresome as fuck tho
The real aswer is that it's ~board culture~ and you should be ~in the know~ and it makes people feel good about themselves to be justified in shitting on someone tho

No. 12312

>>12310
>>12308
Newfags shut the fuck up. Its a board rule. Thats why its annoying to other anons who follow the culutre of this board. Stop preaching about board culture. No one on here goes on and on about it like you. Learn to integrate or don't bother posting. Sage when you don't have jack to add to a thread's milk or topic. How is that difficult? Especially in PT threads which is why it's such a problem for a lot of anons. That's our main board. If you want to talk about 'board culture' then you should understand that our main board should probably be held to the site's rules the most.

No. 12313

File: 1575183694679.jpg (46.94 KB, 512x512, 5e9df687bfcfff0dc67445f137950a…)

There's another wave of tit sperging going on in the Momokun thread.

How many times do people need to say that she has breast reduction scars? How many times do they have to say her tits are saggy? How many times do they have to point out that they're discolored? How many times do they have to say one is bigger than the other?

This is so tiresome. Every possible thing there is to be said about her stupid boobs has been said at least forty times.

No. 12316

>>12310
Some people like to navigate the board by using the ‘hide saged posts’ function to only see important posts that are somewhat milky or relevant.
Posts like this for example:
>>>/pt/735038
>>>/pt/735292
>>>/pt/735379
>>>/pt/735811
aren’t relevant. They don’t add anything of value. So for someone who chooses to hide saged posts, it’s a huge pain in the ass when they STILL have to navigated through heaps of bullshit like that.

Posting things that bump the threads are meant for shit that’s relevant to anyone following the thread. Your personal opinion isn’t important enough that it needs to be seen by everyone.
Plus, it’s annoying af to see a thread being bumped, thinking there’s new milk and it’s just some dumbass being too stubborn or new to integrate properly.

Plus everything >>12312 said.

No. 12317

>>12312
kek i am most definitely not a newfag and have probably been around a lot longer than you so simmer down a bit. this still doesn't explain why you'd rather revert back to /pt/ having absolutely no sage at all? same with >>12316
how does that make sense?
honestly in my experience it's always the people who have been here 6 months/a year who bitch about le newfags sage ree and you guys are way more annoying and still newfags as well

No. 12318

I suggest lengthy bans for anyone that doesn't sage when they have to.


Mods how do you feel about nuking the anti-O thread? it's just a bunch of self posting and twitter user thinking they are more important than they really are. Don't worry I know it won't happen but it's worth a try.

No. 12319

>>12317
No one genuinely suggested to get rid of sage. Are you actually autistic?
We‘re saying that because of the amount of unsaged posts and how little there seems to be done about it, it‘s almost as if sage doesn’t exist in the first place. It’s hyperbolic ffs.

No. 12320

>>12319
Uh >>12303 ?
How would anyone know that's supposed to be hyperbolic when we did have sage taken away on /pt/? Or are you too new to know about that one?

No. 12324

>>12313
people in that thread seem more interested in her tits then the people paying to fucking see them. I'm so sick of it.15 posts about her nipples or how saggy her tits are, who cares at this point? Saggy tits aren't Milky.

No. 12325

>>12312
Ayrt and you proved my point. I do integrate and I do sage, it's really not hard, now if you could get off your pedestal and quit sperging up every thread with sAaaAAgE we could all enjoy ourselves

>>12316
That's what I suspected re: navigation. Personally I think this site needs a new design but I know everyone will freak the fuck reeeeeing about that idea because we need to look exactly like 4chan or something. Also it truly does weed out annoying people who can't figure the site out and who will give up and leave. Honestly it's for the best whenever I think on it. The sage faggots keep out a good portion of newfags kek a decent trade-off

No. 12326

>>12325
telling people to integrate while being a fag about navigation being hard isnt a good look

No. 12327

>>12325
a new design is in the works, admin has stated that in one of these threads

No. 12328

Can we get active bans on the latest 4 posts on moos thread. Jfc.

No. 12329

>>12325
ABSOLUTELY and newfags like >>12325 can bitch aboit it all they want. The site isnt made to suit you. Its how its rules state. Sage or stfu in threads.

No. 12332

>>12329
You can barely operate the site yourself so maybe take several seats

No. 12333

>>12319
>autistic
of course they are, they say kek unironically.

in my opinion board rules should be put exactly in peoples faces, if you want newfags to stop triggering you, then you should urge the admins to make the rules more visible to them.

No. 12334

>>12332
>>12331
Stop trying to troll. Holy shit. Learn to just follow rules you idiot. Then anons wont call you out on it in threads.

No. 12336

>>12334
The thing is that even if you follow the rules you still have to endure the endless empty "Sage!! Dumb idiot" posts so…

No. 12337

>>12336
And thats why this whole thing is a mess. You have newfag anons who dgaf who want to complain about those and then you have the old farmers who are fed up with it and the people in between ignoring it all. Thats why PT needs to go back to autoing posts vs what it is now. If anything that board, as our main, should be the strictest. Especially right now in the Moo and Onion threads. Thats why, with milk flowing between the two of them currently, its so irritating that anons are not saging because the whole 'WOW that nipple is high than the other' posts aren't fucking milk.

No. 12338

If you reeee about sage, you're 30x worse than the anons not sageing their shitposts. Shut up. Using lolcow for one year doesn't make you an oldfag.

No. 12339

>>12338
Nah keep board culture as is. When I see a bunch of unsaged dull reiterated posts over and over in Onion thread I know fuck all interesting is happening. Also it weeds out the newfags and their shit opinion pieces they love to post.

No. 12340

dear admin, can we nuke /ot/ for christmas?

No. 12341

>>12339
Board culture? Have you ever even been on an image board besides lolcow and maybe cc?

It really doesnt matter wether they sage or not when lolcow is as slow as it is and literally no one uses the hide saged posts feature. All this bitching is pointless. Crack down on the sage sperg minimodding 2020

No. 12342

>>11760
Dear admins and farmhands,

Can we please ban people who use the word nonny to refer to an anon? It almost reads like namefagging to me and I suspect it’s one or two of the same people who do this.

This would be the best Christmas present ever. Thank you for your consideration.

No. 12343

>>12341
There would be significantly less minimodding if there was more, you know, actual modding.

No. 12344

>>12343
have you considered the fact that there is modding going on but it's not all redtexted for reeing retards like you and that even if one person gets banned there will always be another one? minimods are cancer

No. 12345

>>12339
I absolutely agree, and it's not just a problem in Greg's threads or /pt/, it's everywhere.
Do I remember wrong or were people actually banned for not saging some time ago? Now you can go as ot as you want, nobody gives a shit.
It's just annoying af, if you don't sage a retarded post that doesn't add anything to the general conversation, then this only serves to show just how important you think your 'opinion' is. Sometimes threads read more like chats, with everybody just quickly typing short answers, without bothering to sage or to learn how to reply to others properly.

No. 12346

There's pinkpill infighting in the artist salt thread

No. 12347

>>12346
every other thread on /ot/ is pink pill infighting.

No. 12348

When the ProJared drama happened, farmhands stepped in so the threads didn't get spammed by a million tweets made by their stans. Would a mind be kind enough to do that again? Most of the screencaps are dumb shit that their fans are saying.

No. 12349

>>12344
lmao I knew there was some retard gonna reee the usual nOt AlL bAnS aRe ReDtExTeD!!!
Yes, I did consider this. But it’s way too obvious that it’s the same few people. And I doubt that all of them are ban evading. Plus, the sheer amount of people in this very thread mentioning the lack of moderation (especially on /pt/ and /ot/) and crying for another hellweek should show that it’s not just a lack of redtext.

Well, let’s hope the new janitors might fix the issue, but looking at the last few posts in that thread make me doubt it.

No. 12352

>>12349
Most of your post history is you telling other people to sage and coming here to complain about sage.
I don't even know how to respond to this. You're literally the problem.

There is also no lack of moderation as reports have been taken care of quickly despite of the holidays. You're literally just pissed because of sage.
Let me tell you why sage bans aren't redtexted; I tell my mods not to redtext minor ban offenses.
By the way, typing like tHiS shows a clear lack of integration, this is not instagram or twitter. Sage is not a big deal on chans and I'm not going to penalize people over it as long as they're contributing. Sage bans basically always apply to some newfag or idiot who treats the board like a chatroom.

No. 12353

>>12352
NTA, but thanks for clarifying, admin. It helps a lot with reporting unsaged posts.

No. 12354

what the hell is going on with all the weird racist dog whistle posts in ot and snow lately???

No. 12355

>>12352
admin, sorry to be mean, but you seem really out of touch if you're trying to criticize part of anon's shitposting it makes you seem like just as much of a sperg as everyone else.

No. 12356

File: 1575569094105.jpg (390.33 KB, 1074x1534, Screenshot_20191205-100442_Chr…)


No. 12357

Can a farmhand please check the erin thread, I think it's pretty obvious that she's selfposting/vendetta-ing herself again like an insane person.

No. 12358

>>12356
no i get that, idiot. my point was that anon isn't typing in a differen t style, she's shitposting on purpose. it's that dumb spongebob meme. admin critiquing her typing when she's being a retard and arguing on purpose has no place here. the rule is for newfags who type like that regularly because they come from tumblr.

No. 12359

>>12358
>>12356
Ntayrt but I'm confused. What does deleting, integration, and lurking have to do with >>12355 's comment about admin
>trying to criticize part of anon's shitposting
? What am I missing here?

No. 12360

>>12356
Anon is pointing out all the things that this newfag isn't doing because they want to post their way regardless of integration or lurking.

No. 12361

>>12352
So you’re saying unsaged tit/hair sperg is contributing valuable content to the moo thread? Alright, noted.

No. 12362

what's up with the baiting, impartial redtexts in the gendercrit thread? i understand mods have their views and i neither agree nor disagree but jesus this is embarrassing

No. 12363

there's a tranny sperg posting gore in the gc thread.

No. 12364

>>12362
They're no longer a janitor for this behavior. Luckily they were only a /ot/ /g/ janitor.

No. 12365

I'd love if we had a option to hide all images.

No. 12366

the reddit hate thread is literally just another P.P thread. they are just using it to whine about men, but on reddit. that doesn't merit it's own thread. just whine about redditors on the fuckig P.P thread.

No. 12367

family's names, phone numbers and addresses are being posted in the plasticnproud thread

No. 12369

/ot/ should be allowed to have a thread about issues involving ethnicity and racism like it has one for feminism.
Not all anons are "white" and would probably want a place to vent about shit that happens regarding their ethnicity/skin color.
Would a containment thread be possible or is the risk of inviting trolls that big?

No. 12370

The nitpicking on the Onision thread has gotten to a ridiculous point. It’s so obnoxious to read “wow ha Onision is really ugly” and the 10484738 variations of it. We get it. He looks like a Neanderthal, or whatever. It’s just bad.

Also, there’s some bait happening in the TND thread and all of the retard anons are responding to it

No. 12371

>>12369
Just no. We will not be allowing even more containment threads.

No. 12372

>>12371
thank you bb.

No. 12373

Why don't we put it to a poll for splitting the threads? We had a poll before for pp. If admin claims to listen to the user base there should be no problem with a poll next townhall. lol

No. 12375

>>12373
didnt the mod just say no more containment threads? Youd be making an already existing thread into two threads.

No. 12376

>>12369
Hey, could you also pls stop sperging about racism in the celebricow thread when all happens is a thotty wearing braids?

No. 12377

Anon in Moo thread freaking out about, my guess, a ban they got.

No. 12378

I just saw what happened in Celebricows and in relation to other recent activity I just wanna say to the mods I stg I'm not a bait poster I'm just genuinely this retarded

No. 12379

>>12377
I was just about to mention this kek. They called the mods "dikes" and trannies, then complained that his ban was too short (while ban evading.) Autism is a hell of a drug.

It always makes for a good laugh when some sped comes into the Moo thread and announces that they're a guy.

No. 12380

Can we get some help in the pnp thread again? Lots of infighting useless posts from newfags.

No. 12381

Why is serious race baiting being allowed at the unpopular opinion thread?

No. 12382

>>12381
This. Can you do something about that? They're trying to hide behind being radfem by calling anyone who doesn't like it tranny too.

No. 12383

Can we please have some regulation on the edits that anons keep making on Onisions thread? The thread is shit, and is continuously getting shittier. It’s just a continuous circle jerk of most of the girls who are barely victims talking about how powerful they are, horrible edits, and the same “Kai is crying” I feel like I will lose my mind if I read another retarded anon say that again.
Or for Christmas we can just nuke the thread entirely.
There’s not a whole lot of genuine contributions except witty anons making digs at Onision/Kai, and speculation on what not victim is being interviewed next. To a degree some of things are important, but it’s also just redundant as fuck.

No. 12384

>>12381
>>12380
>>12383
sounding like we need a good hellweek.

No. 12385

>>12383
Speaking of the edits, idk about the onion thread, but if anons aren't adding shit that even mods say to add in like certain topics are banned to be talked about, can a mod add that into the OP?

No. 12386

>>12383
The fundamental issue is that all the cows and flakes involved read the thread, day and night. They're going to shill their younow streams, they're going to use the site to their own benefit, they're going to post their Reddit tinfoils and new exclusive onision drama videos. They're going to proudly display their cringey edits as well.
I don't feel that there is anything to fix that onision is probably one of the most tipped cows alongside chrischan. The damage has already been done.
>>12385
What specifically needs to be edited into the OP?
>>12381
Report. It's faster than meta but I see my mods got to it earlier.

No. 12387

I joined the Discord and don’t see any text channels. Do they no longer exist, or am I just an idiot who doesn’t know how to use Discord properly?

No. 12388

>>12383
The Onion thread is basically a newfag containment thread at this point lmao

Greg is to LCF what CWC is to Kiwifarms. It's how people find out about the site, so it's plagued with newfaggotry and people making the same jokes/observations/tinfoil they've been making for years.

No. 12389

>>12385
I made this current Onision thread, what warnings did I miss? There's a recent announcement from admin (bolded) and the other ones about anti-o's, ot Lainey talk, and onion flakes/orbiters are there too.

No. 12390

Could we have a new lolcow holiday, like hellweek, but call it newfag day? Mass ban all the non-sagers and obvious newfags. This is getting unbearable at this point honestly. Onions thread is bad but so is moos and Taylor's.

No. 12393

File: 1575884019125.png (108.7 KB, 500x393, D427043B-C8AA-4B2D-B482-2C8303…)

Hey cool guys

Just saying hey. Everyone want to complain but I’m smiling.

No. 12394

If you dont purge and permaban all the retarded twitterfags that have raped the Onion thread soon i’ll kill myself

No. 12395

>>12394
The onison thread is descending into a faggot-riddled hellscape.

Send help, mods

No. 12396

>>12395
I think admin said that they were planning a hellweek soon.

No. 12397

I got banned from a thread for “nitpicking” even though my reply on the thread that got reported said “You guys are being so nitpicky could you stop” how the f does that work

No. 12398

>>12397
Some dumbass sperged in the Moo thread about a surgery she’s never had and it had nothing to do with the cow but I got hit with the ban hammer for telling them it was off topic for “derailing”. Amazing. Shouldn’t mods be the one telling people shit is off topic and irrelevant so we don’t have to?

If farmhands put half the effort they do trigger happy banning people into the onion thread as they do the other threads maybe it wouldn’t be such cancer. I dunno why some threads seem to be moderated so well while others are so so bad

No. 12400

>>12397
You got banned for minimodding about nitpicking instead of reporting. Not for nitpicking! Hope that clears things up for you.

>>12398
We don't really see all that many reports from the Onision thread lately. It would help us get to things a lot quicker if you could report the posts that violate the rules.

No. 12401

File: 1575944970898.jpeg (66.96 KB, 640x640, 4B79E089-8F2F-46F5-AA09-ED2DB8…)

>>12394
>>12395
Hold on longer anons. Bitches come and go. Newfags will weed themselves out. Everyone here is qt

No. 12402

>>12400
Really? I always thought I reported too many things in that thread. I'll try reporting more.

No. 12403

>>12402
Same fam, seems like we need to go ham in there.

No. 12404

scat troll in the onion thread, mods.

No. 12405

please nuke the poop sperger in the onison thread

No. 12406

>>12280

Can we suggest award categories this year?

No. 12407

Requesting a farmhand's help to edit or fix an OP. I created it not realizing that I had mixed up a cow's internet handle with one of their victims.

Their victim came forward to correct my mistake and request it be removed from the OP. The username is Sertraline_Bee.

>>>/snow/904231

No. 12408

Is there any way mods and admins know when an IP is public? I use my phone carrier's data and I've gotten like 3 warnings in the past few days for people who aren't me but do live in the same general area as me, which is a roughly 60 mile span.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]