[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password
(For post deletion)

File: 1559778396231.png (1.21 MB, 797x529, mambo5.png)

No. 10312

Please post all general issues and complaints here. If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.

>>>/meta/6821 should only be used for technical issues and suggestions (can't load site, site slow, bugs, site feature requests). This thread is for non-technical issues.

No. 10314

Idk if this goes more in the technical complaint thread, but it's really hard to post here from Tor. Do you have a problem with people being idiots on Tor, or is there another reason Tor users are routinely blocked from posting? If so, why? I understand a need to cull spam but some of us really prefer to have more privacy about posting/browsing here and it lets us be more candid.

No. 10316

>>>/pt/668315

So WK's and responding to the bait are cool now?

No. 10317

just a suggestion, since we've separated /snow/ and /w/ should we have separate "personal cow" threads for both boards? i'd like a personal cow thread for /w/ related cows.

No. 10318

>>10314
Tor posting isn't banned.
>>10316
WKs aren't banned unless they're derailing, like really derailing. Otherwise they are a source of entertainment. Taking bait is always banned.
>>10317
That is fine, although I think /w/ sort of already has personal weeb/cosplay threads.

No. 10319

>>>/ot/409512

The artist salt thread is full of trans/terf talk since yesterday and it's annoying af.

No. 10320

>>10319
the mods hate trannies too shut up and fuck off

No. 10321

Hoping that a cow kills themselves is not a-logging?

No. 10322

>>10319
I agree, the autistic tranny posting in that thread and derailing needs to get their hurt ass banned.

No. 10323

>>10321
It is, just report it.

No. 10325

>>10318

There's been a lot of WK bait-taking in the Vicky and Luna threads in the last 24 hours.

No. 10327

>>10320
I don't care if someone hates or loves something. Just bring it to the right thread and stop derailling.

No. 10328

>>10318
NTA, but I get a "Your IP address is listed in tor.dsnbl.sectoor.de." pop-up when I try to post from Tor. It finally worked after repeated attempts, then I just now tried to post a screencap and got a "You have been banned" pop-up and the site went mirrored for me.
I didn't break any rules, and the post was made like 4 minutes before, so I feel like it was an autoban.

No. 10329

I know this isn't quite a complaint, but thanks for red texting that stupid fucking 'nonnie'.

I have no idea what faggoty site that is from, or if it's a cow-related meme I never caught onto, but I get a little triggered every time I see someone use it on here.

No. 10330

Why are so many anons misusing the spoiler?

No. 10331

plz permaban anons who infight with shitty 1 word insult replies like scrote/handmaiden/terf. buttblasted anons who can't add to the discussion don't need to get their 2 cents in.

No. 10332

>>10331
>entering the complaint thread to demand permabans for anons who were mean to you
Most embarrassing behavior.

No. 10333

>>10332
nono, you misunderstand. if they want to add to the conversation and use those words, by all means. but simply replying with "gtfo terf" should be grounds for a big ban. people who do that have nothing to say.

No. 10334

>>10328
Huh, I've been able to tor post before in the past but I'll be able to implement tor support into the new engine. It also has better ipv6 support.
>>10331
Just report posts like that so we can actually look into the whole scope of the encounter.

No. 10335

>>10330
I'm noticing this too, and not just joke use of it (which is fine imo) but just spoilering everyday shit for the hell of it, spoilering tweets and stuff.

No. 10336

>>10335

Putting images images behind spoilers unnecessarily makes finding them later a huge PITA; you can't quickly scroll through the thread looking.

It also prevents them from being indexed by Google.

No. 10337

>>10331
>>10334

Currently happening in the Dumbass Shit thread.

No. 10339

>>10337
they were spoiling actual movie spoilers

No. 10341

>>10339

I wasn't talking about spoilers.

No. 10344

obvious male invasion in /ot/ i've been reporting but just giving a general heads up.

No. 10345

There's a massive lolicon spam going on in multiple /ot/ threads from angry scrotes. I'm reporting it as I see it (sorry if there are any duplicate reports).

No. 10346

>>10344
>>10345
Between this and the huge influx of WKs, is it possible that we need more farmhands again?

No. 10347

>>10346
Sorry about that, many in the moderation team were busy yesterday.

No. 10355

What’s going on with the mods lately? You all are red texting & banning completely fine and properly saged posts nowadays for “Autism”.
People are just trying to provide content or discussion (the way it should be on an image board in my opinion) and you just ban them over fucking nothing.

No. 10356

>>10355
seriously this. someone got banned on moo's thread for joke lyrics, cause it mentioned her weight?

how about don't hire on autist mods next time.

No. 10357

>>10355
Huh, which board(s) have you seen this? /pt/?

No. 10358

>>10356
Posts solely about moo's weight have been no contribution bans since the start of the year.
>>10355
Sageing isn't an excuse to break the rules. That goes for shay dog/cat derailment too.

No. 10361

Could you consider putting the Venus Angelic thread back on autosage?
>>>/w/46865

Ever since it’s been removed it’s 90% cancerous infighting, bumping with stupid irrelevant shit, WKing, reposting of old pictures and nitpicking. Plus, there’s barely anything interesting happening with her nowadays anyway.

No. 10362

>>10358
are you autistic? posting about moos weight is for nitpicks, not jokes. a joke isn't a nitpick.

No. 10363

>>10334
yeah mod, I was the first anon to post about this and I had the same experience as >>10328. I actually got both the banned and the blocklist messages just in the past few hours. I got blocked literally like a minute or two after making a saged post that was within the rules and it happens to me all the time. I think you have a blocklist (DNSBL) set up that autoblocks/bans Tor nodes. https://mxtoolbox.com/problem/blacklist/SECTOOR-EXITNODES
https://web.archive.org/web/20050207171531/http://www.sectoor.de:80/tor.php
These links may be a bit old but might be useful, I'm not sure who on the team set this up but you should probably take this blocklist off and either only block ones known for abuse or ban/block on a case by case basis.

No. 10364

Also, it seems like sometimes it happens and others it doesn't. I didn't set up a new circuit since I got that message afaik and now I'm posting without issues.

No. 10365

>>10361
Agreed. She is just doing the “I am a lesbian” routine every other month or so and then everyone takes a turn in arguing if she looks her age/old. Rinse & repeat, worse than back when Taylor R was a thing

No. 10366

I got banned for derailing about lipo in the Moo thread but I saged and Moo is actually getting three procedures of lipo today so how was it derailing? Are we not allowed to talk about her getting lipo?

No. 10367

>>10366
The only post that’s red texted for derailing is the autistic one about her name.
You sure you were banned for a lipo post?

No. 10369

File: 1560890160138.jpg (116.65 KB, 957x584, 2019-06-18_14-44-56.jpg)

>>10367
Yep. I was only asking because Moo would have already been messing up her surgery if a liquid diet was required because she wasn't sticking to it yesterday. If it was nitpicking then sure I'd understand, but it doesn't mention that.

No. 10370

>>10369
25 minute ban like nigga make yourself some spaghetti

No. 10371

>>10369
>Ask a question that has nothing to do with Moo
>Get banned for 25 mins without red text
>"Wtf are we not allowed to talk about Moo getting lipo at all anymore???"
honk honk

No. 10372

>>10370
Get over yourself, I'm not upset about the limit.. I just wanted to know why I was since I didn't see a farmhand say no lipo talk, a question ain't gonna kill anyone.

No. 10373

>>10372
Probably because Google

No. 10374

>>10373
I'll admit that it's something I could have googled. It would have been better if it mentioned that, cause if it was simply the lipo talk then they would have to ban 80% of the anons there cause it's been the main topic for days.

No. 10375

>>10374
you need to be explicitly told the comment wasn't about moo but rather a googleable question about lipo prep? really anon?
>it's the principle of a 25 min ban!

No. 10376

Can we get rid of the Itsybitsychu/Theresa Eng thread? It's infested with males and absolute cancer.

No. 10377

>>10376
agree. every time it gets bumped its obvious the thread is being used as a pornshare

No. 10378

has anyone else noticed an insane amount of blogposting lately? is summer already here?

No. 10379

why dooes /ot/ need a manhate and a handmaiden thread? why the fuck are there so many hateful little shits on this site? /ot/ used to be comfy now it's just /fempol/

No. 10380

>>10379
Handmaiden refers to the discussion of rug behaviour that women do for men, man hate is to highlight what men do and not to discuss women.

Either way that’s where you draw the line?

No. 10381

>>10379
>why the fuck are there so many hateful little shits on this site?
because its lolcow. you dont exactly sound like an angel yourself, faggot. hide threads you dont want to see.

No. 10382

Can we enforce the whole board culture rule? People are seriously getting butthurt over dumbshit like ((())) and faggot being used. People need to get with the board culture or fuck off entirely.

No. 10383

>>10382
>get with the culture or get off my board!!!!
>doesn’t sage her shit

No. 10384

>>10383
what? anon doesn't need to sage her questions on a questions thread you moron.

No. 10385

>>10383
Lol dumbass, it’s the complaint thread, why the fuck wouldn't they want to bump it? Or do you think you’re supposed to sage 100% if the time?

No. 10386

>>10383
You know what the point of sage is, right? Not only was anon's post on topic but this thread is bumped to the top of /meta/ 100% of the time. Sageing doesn't matter in here.

No. 10387

>>10385
being buttblasted that people reply back to her with sass for saying faggot and making jewish jokes is not, in fact, really worth bumping shit over unless you’re a self obsessed retard

No. 10388

>>10387
>not, in fact, really worth bumping shit over
The thread was already at the top of the board when anon made the post, dumbass. You have no idea what you're talking about. Yet another sped who has never touched an ib besides lolcow calling other anons newfags.

No. 10389

>>10387
maybe go to c.c to get coddled for hating meanies on image boards.

No. 10391

please ban anons who accuse anons of being men just because they got their feelings hurt.

please make /rf/ for the radfems so they stop turning /ot/ into femcel /pol/.

No. 10392

>>10391
Lol. All this because you got upset that an anon posted a witch gif in ot and mentioned being a radfem.

No. 10393

>>10392
i'm not even someone who was arguing. i just think you guys are all crazy and this kind of infighting is fucking annoying and toxic for the board.

No. 10394

>>10391
>throw a tantrum because someone made an innocuous post you didn't like, as it had the words "radical feminism"
>expect people not to respond wondering what tf your problem is
>when they do, start making unsaged, combative shitposts and sparking off infighting
>later go to /meta/ to demand that the anons who hurt you by pointing out that only a high testosterone individual would unironically be this unhinged and oversensitive over nothing get banned
>demand that the site to be made into a safe space for you and that all opinions you don't like should be sent a special containment board to safeguard your emotional hang-ups
>liken women not liking TiMs or males to /pol/tards for literally no reason
>screech about femcels for no reason (AKA the one tell ALL our resident scrotes and TiMs do, and have done in /meta/ threads in the past)
and you really wonder why people think you're an entitled man and/or troon? go and dilate, you have bigger issues at hand.
inb4 "i swear i wasn't arguing, it's everyone else's fault for posting witch pictures"

No. 10395

File: 1561143975207.gif (32.52 KB, 156x90, clapping.gif)

>>10391
This is the most petty shit I've ever seen in my life.

No. 10396

>>10394
A lot of the arguing came from radfem defenders throwing insults. And then getting mad insults were being thrown back. You seem like you need some fresh air.

No. 10397

>>10394
Is this how that infight went down according to you and your headmates? Jfc none of this happened in reality.

No. 10398

the best pseudo cows come out of meta bitching, I swear

No. 10399

>>10391
Just ignore posts that don't appeal to you next time, anon. It's called a "dumbass shit" thread. You're meant to hide it if you're averse to dumbass shit.
And to be honest, what does it even matter if some online strangers think you're a man? Maybe don't get salty about posts that vaguely mention disliking men if you don't want anyone to think that you might be one yourself.
It's pretty petty to come whining to /meta/ over something so pathetic, and insist there should be a whole new board exclusively for radfems because of it, lmao. Just go to CC, /tttt/, Twitter, Tumblr or one of the many available subforums on Reddit if radfems on LC are so bothersome to you. The /pol/ comparison is ridiculously unfitting, too. Everyone here hates /pol/, including those in GC threads, and those that don't either get laughed off the whole board, or straight-up banned.

No. 10400

>>10391
radfems don't deserve a board for themselves here they can fuck off and make their own site

No. 10401

>>10392

Which thread did this happen in?

No. 10402

Belle Delphine thread has turned into radfem / antiporn autist land with tons of a logging and barely posting milk on Belle.

No. 10403

>>10399
god you're autistic. she means /ot/ is becoming the radfem version of /pol/, aka, a shitty echochamber of insane shitty ideals.

No. 10404

>>10403
The constant tranny/male accusations are becoming highkey reminiscent of the jew/fed accusations thrown around on pol. It wasn't so bad a while ago when they weren't baseless but now anyone who /r/adfems don't like MUST be a man. They really are turning ot into an echochamber.

No. 10406

>>10403
Except she lowkey wasn't talking about /ot/ as a whole, but her fit in a specific thread. Keep up.
Again, who really cares if some random person thinks you're a man? So what?

No. 10407

>>10406
that anon wasn't even the one who insulted your fucking joke, autismo. go take a xanax. i can't believe you're still butthurt about that a full day later.

No. 10408

>>10407
You're the only one coming off butthurt, give it a rest and stop coming here to bitch every time someone's mean to you.

No. 10409

lets have the opposite of a hellweek

No. 10410

Not the robot complaining but I do actually feel like the anti-anime thread should be moved to /m/. Seems more suitable since it's discussion on media.

No. 10411

>>10394
ntayrt but you really don't see how this post makes you look … ? Lots of us hate you fucking femcels because this shit bleeds out all over the board. 'Bu-bu-but everyone else is the problem!'

>>10403
It's been that way for a long time. There's been attempts to clean it up, but the chemo hasn't been strong enough.


Still waiting on Raven's posts to get tagged. Hoping that is still going to happen.

No. 10412

Mods is there any update regarding the amount of radfem OT posts and moralfagging/soapboxing? I feel like this site is slowly becoming PULL with a side of /pol/

No. 10413

the radfem shit is annoying because they act like the men they hate. they want the entire userbase to have some rigid set of beliefs and those of us who don't get accused of not being women. it's basically the equivalent of not being "womanly" enough.

also there's a huge difference with how the radfem/femcel userbase acts.

No. 10414

>>10413
You anti-radfems are really annoying, coming here to whine to mommy each time you see some post you don't like. And no not everyone who writes something you dislike is a radfem.

No. 10415

Add me to the list of anons who are sick of the radfemcel plague. Political sperging targeted at anyone and everyone who goes against their beliefs is as annoying as racebait at this point.

No. 10416

>>10414
Y’all are a few autistic fucks shitting this site up

No. 10418

>>10411

>Raven's posts


The last I heard was that Admin was trying to be ready to post at the same time the new thread was posted.

No. 10419

>>10418
I would also love to see these flagged.

Can we also get the Isa thread unlocked at the same time? It was inaccurately labelled as a vendetta thread at the time and tbh I'm still buttblasted about that. Many a shit thread has since been unlocked (e.g. pnp) so would be nice to see that one as well.

No. 10420

What is with anons misusing the spoiler?

Can images that don't need it be unspoilered, esp OP images like >>>/ot/425447?

No. 10421

the cc tier complaining should be bannable. its obvious there has been a recent wave of males and newfags

No. 10422

>>10403
>>10404
>>10411
>>10412
>>10413
>>10414
>>10415
New guidelines for /ot/ based off complaints.
>>>/ot/426018
Also a reminder that constant tranny and male accusations are against the board rules.
>>10421
Report it. If it's moralfaggotry or derailing it's up for grabs.

No. 10423

New Kabukihoe thread in /w/ is obvious vendetta and no milk besides posting random sex workers. Can we clamp down on the random bitches in Japan threads? There’s already the gyaru, Vk, Gaijin hunter, aidoru stuff. I just feel like this is made and bumped by same person.

No. 10424

>>10422

Thank you for the /ot/ rules, admin-sama.

No. 10425

I have no complaints or issues, I just wanna wtf is the "Orange" style supposed to be and why.

No. 10426

>>10422

Aaand immediately there's more derailing in the Dumbass Stuff thread.

No. 10427

I was wondering if there was a way to kind of curb some of the cowtipping waves that are popping on in various threads across the site? I don’t know if it’s the same group of people or just newfags with bad habits from other sites.

No. 10428

can we put PnP back on autosage? i was actually one that advocated for her not to be a banned topic but autosage seems to be the only thing that curbs the absolute autists that flock to that thread. the cowtipping, medfagging, blogposting and everything else is ridiculous at this point.

No. 10429

>>10425
I checked it out because of you and same tbh

No. 10430

>>10428
Does autosage actually improve the site? I don't see how that's a better solution than hiding a thread you don't like on your own end.

No. 10431

>>10430
It does lose a certain number of problem posters from the thread who simply can't find it anymore, and then thread quality often improves. PnP never seems to get better no matter what though. No I tell a lie, it's actually the best it's ever been, it's just still shit.

No. 10432

>>10428
Can whoever is posting in the PNP thread who isn't saging and posting their own cowtipping be banned? It's getting ridiculous in there.

No. 10433

>>10430
no, that's why other image boards got rid of it. all sage does is show people who is a newfag and make everyone salty.

No. 10435

File: 1561654585379.jpg (74.64 KB, 1023x797, 8dc.jpg)

Just want mods thoughts on the whole Jared/Holly/GG threads moving forward (since discussion isn't slowing down) – did it really need to be split off into a thread separate from GG?

Basically the "Waffle crew / DCA thread" ( >>>/snow/826388 ) became the new GG thread. Now we have a thread where it's discussing the exact same milk as the last several GG threads were, but claiming its not a GG thread, but there's also no GG thread to continue on. Just seems messy and unnecessary. I know the GG themselves don't specifically have much milk these days, but everyone in the GG Cinematic Universe does, it just seemed like an easier designation to have them be the center of that venn diagram. If you're going to claim that Holly/Jared/Waffle Crew aren't associated with GG anymore, then there shouldn't be any talk of Ross or anyone else in that thread, but there is. It just seems stupid.
>they're not associated with GG!
>they need their own thread!
>talks about the exact same people/milk as in the past 6 GG threads, including GG people
>no new GG thread
>?????
Even if there was a new GG thread, are we expected to talk about Ross/everyone else in the GGCU and not Holly? Do Mods think this makes sense? I think it might be helpful to just have a final say on this from Mods either way, since this has been discussed in the last few threads as well.

No. 10436

not a complaint, but posting from tor works without any issues or sudden bans now, and i wanted to thank admins/mods <3

No. 10437

can we not ban people for using old threads on /pt/ before they are locked??? newfags who make the thread at the 1100 post should be the ones banned.

also consider changing the 1100 post notification to 1150.

No. 10438

>>10435
Wouldn't the Lainey rule apply to this? If the thing you're gonna say about Holly is directly about GG rather than the cheatingdrama then say it in the GG thread, and if the Ross thing you're gonna say is more about the Projared drama rather than GG, then say it in that thread.

Splitting topics to this extent doesn't work as well as just banning people that fight about whether a post is relevant imo but since the Lainey thing exists why not do it here too.

No. 10440

>>10437
This though. Best example as of recently is the momokun thread. Newfags will jump the gun, make an extremely shit OP and everyone is forced to use it.

No. 10441

>>10437
This though. Best example as of recently is the momokun thread. Newfags will jump the gun, make an extremely shit OP and everyone is forced to use it.

No. 10442

>>10435
>>10438
Lainey is totally different since a whole culture of tempfags, aka bored stay-at-home mums, sprung up around talking about how she looked like a foot and ruined the threads under the watch of the previous admin. All they had to do was make a Lainey thread anytime in the last year or so but no, they had to be forced because they're children about it.

The Holly/Jared subject has been shortlived so far and I'm going to go out on a limb and assume the new thread was made by someone who wanted to quarantine Holly conversation out of their precious GG threads for their own reasons. The problems with this "DCA" themed thread are that DCA is ostensibly over and the other couple doesn't have any public drama. It just seems like a bullshit construct to me.

No. 10443

>>10437
The post you’re talking, I mostly used the red text to direct people to the new thread. Even if the new thread is shit, people were already moved onto the next one for a while. No point in having both being bumped.
If you see someone making crappy/lazy OPs please report and we will try to deal with it, I agree they have been very obnoxious lately. I think I’ll bring it up with staff to see how we can deal with it better.

No. 10445

just letting a farmhand know the eunuch drawing DA thread is back. the /snow/ thread was locked and the OP told to put it in the artist thread but they just put it on /ot/ as it's own thread. i could care less about the content but i am sick of people breaking so many rules cause "lel summerfags hate radfems".

No. 10446

>>10445
Maybe it was remade because there is actual milk and it doesn't belong in artist salt or GC.
And why are you so angry about this? Are you one of the so-called summerfags?

No. 10447

>>10445
i'm pretty sure it was remade because there is actual milk and it doesn't belong in artist salt or gc.
and why are you so annoyed about this? are you one of the so-called summerfags? we've had threads about specific artists in /ot/ who don't exactly fit into /snow/ without any problems, and lots of people want to talk about them.

No. 10448

Can someone please remind me how to sage comments

No. 10449

>>10447
>>10446
accidental doublepost and can't delete now, sorry. i thought the first one didn't go through and i got hasty

No. 10450

>>10448

Nevermind found it straight after posting.

Would be handy if site info was next to the rules in the menu bar

No. 10451

>>10446
>>10447
you can't just remake threads that get locked as you please.

>>10449
nice backpedal on your obvious samefagging on /meta/. peep that typing style.

No. 10452

>>10451
then instead of mini-modding, let the farmhands debate it. chances are they've seen the thread and are thinking about it now.
and can you read?
>i got hasty
i post from tor, and if a post doesn't go through because of shitty connection, it's annoying having to retype it with punctuation. what kind of idiot would samefag with the exact same sentences?

No. 10453

>>10451
>you can't just remake threads that get locked as you please.

you sound just like the kid in school who would remind the teacher that there was homework. The mods aren't gonna give you a sticker just for being such a stuck up about rules.

No. 10454

>>10453
>>10452
it got locked already. get over it. the site is going to go to shit if we keep ignoring rules and decisions. that's why the site was so shit before new based admin fixed it up.

No. 10455

>>10454
I also like new admin but you're delusional if you think every single rule and decision makes sense. It's one admin and a few farmhands, they're human and not some goddly creatures who never make bad decisions and whose rules are always to be followed. Just like laws should be a reflection of ethics and not regarded as ethical values themselves.

No. 10456

>>10455
Agreed.
I think leaving things like this 100% up to mods' discretion without making room for user's input is just going to make the entire userbase unhappy in the long run.
If the bar has risen recently, and creepy fetish artists no longer count as milky, then at this rate, I feel like roughly 70% of our flakes and cows must be even lower on the grading scale.
To be sure: Can we have a hard definition for what constitutes as milk for convenience? Maybe a bullet point list so we can check each one off from now on before threads get made? If there is any doubt, anons can just reference the "tenets of milk" and provide their best examples for each one, and we can all live in peace.

No. 10457

>>10455
i'm sorry your shitty thread got locked, but you miss my point, the issue here is being entitled and making the thread without discussing it with mods. no shit the rules aren't law or ethics, but bratty anons who don't even bother considering decisions and trying to come to agreements without taking matters into their own hands are what brings the site down.

you have to give to take, anon.

No. 10458

>>10456
read >>10457 the issue is that the OP never discussed why the thread should be reinstated, and the mod told her where she could put it and there would have been no issue.

why not have a fetish artist thread if you're so set on this.

the entire thread to me just seems like some weird femcel raging that someone is drawing castrated men to be prettier than women but w/e. point is if you guys think the thread has merit, be cordial.

No. 10459

>>10458
I was the OP, and I acknowledge that I should've asked permission after the lock. I didn't make the very first thread, but it being locked on the basis of it having no milk weirded me out, and other anons seemingly felt the same, so I acted on that, admittedly rashly. I would've just ignored it if it was one obvious vendetta thread being bumped by the same person over and over, but these artists were legitimately fucking weird, and multiple people agreed on that.
>why not have a fetish artist thread if you're so set on this.
I'm not against this, but the emerging issue here seems to be that farmers and farmhands don't exactly have the same definition of "milk" anymore.
To be honest, this sort of thing is just going to keep happening until we have a set criteria on milk that we can all agree on.
>the entire thread to me just seems like some weird femcel raging that someone is drawing castrated men to be prettier than women but w/e.
I strongly disagree with this, and I have a feeling I'm not the only one, but you have a right to your own opinion. I definitely don't like some threads on /w/, /pt/ or /snow/ myself, but since I know they have their own dedicated audiences who are enjoying the content, I don't get pissy about them. I just hide them. It's a good tool on all imageboards, and I encourage taking advantage of it whenever you have the chance.

No. 10460

>>10459
While I understand the decisions to lock the threads, I do think editing Wikipedia about real people in history in a fetish fanfic way was milky.

No. 10461

>>10457
I'm not even the OP of the threads, I just fiercly disagree with mods closing the thread in the first place. There wasnt even any place for discussion. Then, when some farmer came in here to complain about it, she got shut down with "you shouldnt have remade the thread" instead of with actual reasons for why the thread was shut down.

I'm generally against closing threads unless they're absolutely milkless and attract the worst kind of interactions.

No. 10462

>>10460
absolutely, everything about those eunuch sisters is autistic and fascinating.
it's NOT about the art, it's NOT about being salty about the trannyism, it's about how telling the art is of their repressed fetishes / warped ideals.
I'm triggered - these threads were so much fun and I don't think polluting other threads with gallons of the milk of these same eunuch sisters is the right answer.

No. 10463

>>10459
Maybe the lack of milk classification is because the cow isn't actually doing anything IRL in a way that is amusing? Isn't the thread entirely about her shitty artwork and not necessarily about her narcissistic antics? There isn't drama there, and milk is pretty reliant on drama.

Or at least that's how I've managed to make sense of the mod decision to shut it down on account of "no milk". I can see art salt anons not wanting the content in that thread, so maybe just a new thread in /m/ specifically about this one artist? Idk.

No. 10464

>>10463
yes a thread for the eunuch crazies in /m/ is a good middle ground idea.

No. 10465

>>10463
>>10464
Yeah, I guess it's technically media, after all.

No. 10466

Wtf is going on with power hungry farmhands who ban for no real reason? I know there are different farm hands on board but it's ridiculous to be banned for 3 days in all boards because of a song stupid comment in snow or /w

No. 10467

>>10466
I haven't been banned or anything but I've noticed it too.

The summer has brought on a lot of people antagonizing other users for no reason just like every year but for some reason this year nothing has really been done about it meanwhile people get banned for the weirdest things that normally wouldn't warrant a ban.

No. 10468

>>10467
Exactly. I'm a regular user and I've seen so many summerfags here but i get banned for Bs with no warning. Mods need to sort this out

No. 10469

Am I in bizarro lolcow? That thread was milky, those girls are something else. It’d be a waste making the discussion end up in Artists Salt, just like some anon said, no one reads it and the milk at hand is wildly different from what’s in there. There’s obviously enough people weirded out here to keep the thread going. Fuckin’ shame, it was one of the only interesting threads currently going on. If they’re dead-set on locking it because anons were bratty, guess we’d have to take it to the putrid KF, at lest it’d thrive.

No. 10470

>>10436
Actually I'm having worse issues than ever with Tor posting right now. It got slightly better for a bit and now it's awful. I'm having to try a new circuit something like six times just to try to make a post and it's happening to me over and over. Same issue as before, dns blacklist and "you have been banned" messages which are ostensibly from other people who got the IP blocked. Idk how many people could be banned at once for me to try several new circuits and get that several times though. This issue must not be fully fixed, please fix this because it's making the quality of use really bad and posting horrid, and since it's through something anonymizing you could miss out on a lot of good content from people who don't want to show up without, including and especially milk.

No. 10471

>>10470
Same anon, this somehow came through without issues but when I was trying to post in /g/ and /ot/ I had issues, including posting from this exact same tor circuit.

No. 10472

More useful info, sorry to shit the thread up: it seems like it maybe isn't happening every time you try to post from a specific tor circuit, only sometimes. Maybe a combo of blacklist/ban list and a weird glitch?

No. 10473

I kinda think the wording of the 1100-post warning could be reconsidered? It's triggering people to worry and start new threads. Yes these are new people without the patience to wait but the effect is real anyway. It was designed to be a help but now people are taking it far too seriously.

No. 10474

>>10469
Yeah really, wtf mods? Why do you guys gotta be so bitter and such sticklers? That thread was super active and milky. I want the Develv thread back.

No. 10475

>>10474
>>10469
co-signed. i want one of the eunuch threads back too.

No. 10476

>>10469
Agreed. I just quickly scrolled through the thread, but people were obviously having fun in there. I have no idea why it should be banned. If someone doesn't like it, they can just hide it. It's not bothering anyone.

No. 10477

>>10469
It's sad only drama nowadays is considered milk, PT had no drama until anons poked the bear. She was just a strange person editing herself yellow and posting insensitive things. Tons of the people who made it on ED back then were these kinds of people.
Every other flake in snow is a camwhore or general attention whore asking for money online or on instagram. I guess our concept of milk nowadays is very different.

No. 10478

>>10474
Agree. We haven’t had any actual bizarre milk in so long. Most of our flakes nowadays are just thots that anons nitpick. This had some actual potential

No. 10479

>>10477
yea milk =/= drama. and it was more than just art, those girls were editing wikipedia articles to make their weird fetishes and pairings "real". im sure theres more messed up shit if we dug further.

they are a lot more entertaining than most of the current cows imo. most of the other threads are just old milk/anons nitpicking. the only milky recent event was margo being arrested, but since shes been detained thats dried up too.

No. 10480

>>10477
I agree that drama shouldn't exclusively be considered milk, though it does seem to be the current definition for the mod team. I don't even think I'll post in the eunuch thread but it does deserve to have a place in a board somewhere instead of being locked on sight. Just tell them a board to go to and let them have a thread of their own. What are you being stingy for?

No. 10481

>>10480
Looks like there is plenty of material about them, I think one of the threads should be unlocked.

No. 10482

>>10466
>>10467
>>10468
100% this

There are also times where I'm almost certain I've gotten a ban for harmless comments moments after posting just because I must be replying to some farmhand with name off who thinks the opposite.

Seeing a lot of bans that look like they are just barring discussion outside of the popular opinion as well. Bans for obvious thread culture (pretty sure I saw a hi cow red text in one of the recent Mira threads lmao).

Also the choice to lock the new GG-projared thread just so we could finish the last of the remaining thread off was pants on head retarded. I get that newfags have been making threads prematurely but what a nitpick tier mod decision – just change the fucking make a new thread auto message to have better instructions.

No. 10483

>>10425
These are just old tinyboard themes I made viewable. They've always existed.
>>10427
We're pretty tough on cowtipping but waves of newfags come in swarms.
>>10428
>>10430
I'll try to have the thread more heavily moderated. Auto sage seems counterproductive.
>>10435
I agree this doesn't make sense. As soon as the projared drama dies down the threads can be filled with GG or DCA milk.
The Separate thread has been locked and any GG and DCA discussion can go into >>>/snow/829410
>>10437
I can change the automatic notification to 1150
>>10438
Lainey was split off because her milk is repetitive and unless it directly relates to Greg it's just nitpicking.
>>10450
There is a guide to posting on the rules page.
>>10456
This is literally on the rules page and was previously discussed on /meta/.
>>10459
Board rules for /snow/
Cosplayers, j-vloggers, and lolitas belong in /w/. Make sure that the subject of a new thread is a cow, otherwise the thread is subject to deletion. Subjects must meet 3 out of the 5 following criteria:

-An unhealthy desire for attention
-Failure to accept criticism
-A lack of self awareness
-Delusions related to their skill or self importance
-No willingness to improve upon their behavior

All subjects must have:

-A documented history of bizarre behavior displayed online
-Some sort of public presence outside of private circles, groups or irc channels. Personal cows can go in the personal lolcows thread.
You can have a thread in /snow/ as long as it fits this. The subject or potential interest doesn't matter, not all of us obsess over camgirls, afterall.
>>10466
>>10468
This is a valid complaint but don't samefag. It's embarrassing.
>>10470
I'll check it out. Sorry about that.

No. 10485

>>10483
>Failure to accept criticism
Tried to argue that men don't have stomach fat to defend one of their drawings of an MtF, and staunch refusal to accept anything in reality that challenges their weird pedophilic eunuch fantasies.
>A lack of self awareness
They unironically believe everything they draw is accurate to history.
>Delusions related to their skill or self importance
The fact that they felt themselves important and knowledgeable enough to edit Wikipedia for the sake of their eunuch fetish.
>No willingness to improve upon their behavior
This is one of the most glaring issues with them. They respond with aggression, revisionist history (or outright misquoting religious texts like the Quaran) and irritation to anything that challenges their world view.

Many of their posts are linked to and translated by a Rusanon here >>>/ot/428413 to validate these claims, and the thing about stomach fat is mentioned in the first thread >>>/snow/828717.

>A documented history of bizarre behavior displayed online

Holywarsoo has their posts, and they remain active on dA, IG, etc.
>Some sort of public presence outside of private circles, groups or irc channels. Personal cows can go in the personal lolcows thread.
They also have public dA, IG, Twitter, etc accounts that they use.

This good?

No. 10486

>>10483

>We're pretty tough on cowtipping


I got banned for cowtipping for a screenshot I reposted from KF and clearly stated was from KF. I thought mods were trained to look at a user's comment history?

No. 10487

>>10483
Then why lock the /ot/ thread? 90% of artist salt is going to be about them now. Just allow a thread in /ot/.

No. 10488

Please mods just let us make a new thread /snow/ or unlock the old one

No. 10489

>>10487
Exactly. It’s should be perfectly fine to have a separate /ot/ thread for it. I like admin but she just has to own up to the fact that yes, her farmhand fucked up.

No. 10490

Mods is it safe to make a new thread about Deva on /snow/ now ?

No. 10491

what the fuck is wrong with the eunuch posters? they are derailing the art salt thread unsaged right now while other discussion is going on and the keep samefagging about how "super unique" these """cows""" are as if they're not the same as every other cringy DA fetish artist.

i suggested a art fetish general but i don't think they even deserve to have it now because they're so fucking entitled.

No. 10492

>>10491
are you the same farmer who bitched about the thread existing in /ot/ and then went to bitch over people posting about it in the art salt thread (like a farmhand told us to do) and keep mentionning nazi fetish fanart? It's obvious that there are a lot of farmers interested in these cows but only one farmhand and maximum two posters bothered by it and yet we are the entitled ones…

No. 10493

>>10483
The russiananon mentioned by >>10485 has managed to unearth a lot about these girls into English for us. Two homeschooled cultists of no fixed abode who feign being historians and linguists online, post racist art and edit history entries on wikipedia to bend to their fetishes… cmon. I don't follow art threads and I'm sure as hell not going to the gender crit thread. I want to read about these two freaks. They're definitely flakes, as it turns out.

>>10482
Seconding this, it happened to me recently when I reported some derailing on both sides of an argument - hardly partial. I guess I reported a farmhand in there somwhere. It feels like the first flush of attention and improvement since the staff changeover has given way to something else.

No. 10494

>>10491
This, maybe if these anons weren't so fucking autistic the mods would let them have their stupid thread.

No. 10495

>>10492
lol, what a weird world you live in. you don't even know if one farmhand or multiple locked it, you are just guessing.

No. 10496

I don't get the problem with the eunuch thread tbh. It was entertaining to read/lurk and then it was randomly locked.

No. 10497

>>10491
>>10494
do you just not want anyone discussing things you're not personally into? we were made to take it there. in fact, we're still trying to get our own thread. this whole problem is a fuck-up on the farmhand's part, it being sent to the artist salt there was literally their command.
if you really want us out, you'll be on our side in asking for one of the threads to be unlocked so we can move there.

>but muh art fetish general


are you a mod? do you have any authority on what threads get locked? if not, then your suggestion was completely worthless and most likely would've just resulted in another lock for making a thread without permission and going against the farmhand's command to keep it in artist salt.
if you think differently, make a thread yourself with the eunuch sister's stuff and a rundown of their content as the OP, and see what happens. if it's accepted, the posters will inevitably go there, you can hide it and everyone will be happy. if it's not, accept it, make sure to take responsibility so no one can say "wow the eunuch sister posters are so dumb they just won't stop making threads without permission" and be quiet

No. 10498

>>10491
>derailing the art salt thread

That’s one of the very few threads I actually frequent, and it can be radio silent for days. There’s hardly ever anything to discuss except for someone reeeing over Kasey. Also, they’re artists - how is it derailing to discuss artists in the ARTIST thread? Why are some anons so weirdly assblasted over these eunuch fetishists, does it hit too close to home about your own weird fetishes?

No. 10500

>>10492
It definitely is one of maybe three people (max) complaining non-stop about anybody discussing the dA users, both here and on /ot/. You can tell it's them because this is maybe the second time this one has claimed all the people who want to talk about this subject are "samefagging", with the exact same typing style, at that.
No wonder they're accusing everybody of samefagging. It's probably actually what they've been up to all this time.

Mild tinfoil, but I feel like they're dead-set on derailing any calm discussion on this subject via infighting. They're probably doing it in hopes that the entire topic will be banned, perhaps because it makes them feel personally targeted somehow. So, to get back on point:
We've confirmed they have milk after an anon found and loosely translated their Russian social media posts, and enough people obviously want to talk about them. We've even gone over the hard criteria for milk. There's really no reason not to have a thread at this point.
The art salt thread anons who want to discuss YouTubers will be able to do so without having to wade through eunuch artist milk, and the eunuch artist posters will have their own space delegated to talk about this subject. Everybody would win hypothetically, so why not?

No. 10501

>>10499
Not only is there milk, the thread doesn't even need to be in /snow/ necesarily. /m/ or /ot/ can host the topic and it would fit right in. We have an abundance of stupid as shit threads with no discussion and this one is currently popular and there's no good reason to disallow that.

If the thread dies down then lock it and chuck it I guess but to shut it down this hard seems like powertripping.

No. 10502

Mods the vast majority of users want a separate thread for these 2 just let us make a new thread and guarantee you want lock it

No. 10503

>>10502
>vast majority of users
it sounds like the same 3 or 4 anons bitching and subtly samefagging to me

No. 10504

>>10498
don't be a faggot, posts like >>>/ot/428788 are clearly derailing. telling someone they will be ignored is fucking derailing.

No. 10505

why is this imageboard managed like a subreddit and not like other imageboards?

No. 10506

>>10505
It works more like /vg/ or a smaller imageboard. Each thread is kind of like a 'general' instead of just a bunch of random shit. It's fine how it is.

No. 10507

>>10506
i didn't mean it like that.

No. 10508

File: 1561997310629.png (104.89 KB, 1892x400, m9842x.png)

this was a really odd ban. the anon was just describing the current situation for someone who asked. what's next, banning the anon who came back after a week and dared to question what the hell was going on?
>inb4 i "suddenly" get accused of being that anon ban evading and receive a ban even though my comment history should be easy to check (then again i'm on tor)
between this and all the complaints about poorly thought out bans lately, what the hell is even going on with our farmhands? they were doing so well from the start

>>10498
to be honest, any current issues in the artist salt thread will go away if one of the eunuch sisters threads is unlocked. it's that simple. no one has even been able to explain why they don't count as milky so far.
one persistent weirdo claiming anybody who wants to discuss them must totally actually be a "samefagging femcel m'dude why don't you care about kawaii nazis instead??" isn't a good argument at all

No. 10509

>>10501
exactly! I can be in /ot/ or /m/, but just let us have our own thread! There are literally threads for : dog hating, stalking dead people, prepping, karens, fucking BIDETS! But we cant have a thread about objectivly milky fetish-ridden sisters raised in a cult in Vietnam?

No. 10510

>>10508
>odd ban
>unsage'd offtopic post
>being so autistic that you don't realize the OP was asking a hypothetical

you tell me.

No. 10511

>>10510
then in addition to that anon, the sperg who keeps derailing to call everyone a samefag and complain about anybody discussing the sisters should've long since been redtexted, but they keep coming back

No. 10512

>>10501
i dont even see why it would matter if it were put in /snow/ when we have artists like baylee and holly who barely produce milk beyond their failing art careers?

No. 10513

>>10512
It's really starting to look like the only reason mods aren't listening is pure hubris and refusal to admit they could've made a lapse in judgment. I'm not saying that's the case, but it's just…not a good look.
No one is happy with this current set-up, and the solution is so easy.
This almost reminds me of when our original admin, Ian, threw a shitfit and locked/deleted a bunch of threads before he left the site. The only reason he gave was that he personally didn't care for them.

No. 10514

>>10511
what ever happened to samefag redtexting? do they just not use it anymore? it used to be pretty effective at exposing spergs and people desperate to mini mod threads in the past.

No. 10515

>>10514
>>10513
it's really obvious you tards are selfposting when half the posts are just gushing over the bootiful art and how kawaii the creators are.

just give it a rest no1curr about you.

No. 10516

>>10515
>even targeted the anon who innocently asked about samefag redtexting, implicitly admitting that they're the same retard who's been samefagging about this for days
you really must be here just for the summer, congrats on learning a new word after babbling "samefag", "femcel" and "nazi" hundreds of times. unfortunately, no one is buying your dumb tinfoil. if these russian chicks were selfposting, not only would the english in all the posts be worse, they wouldn't even once criticize their shitty psuedo-history, but that's all anyone's been doing.
go and find something that's actually constructive to say, or take your autism elsewhere. the farmhand messed up, this always required its own thread, and anons will keep requesting one until it's addressed. cope.

No. 10517

File: 1562012732085.jpg (8.03 KB, 276x183, nnvih[1].jpg)

>>10516
you ok?

No. 10518

>>10517
are you? i mean seriously, you've been repeating the same thing so many times. everyone's pretty sick of it.
this thread is for mods to address complaints, not for you to attack people and tinfoil

No. 10519

Is there a farmhand watching the Taylor Dean thread? There's so much unsaged stuff and infighting going on.

No. 10520

So farmhannds can we make a thread about these 2 now ?

No. 10521

>>10519
The nitpicking and weird takes in that thread… wild shit.

No. 10522

>>10521

The nitpicking and downright nastiness about the guy she met in rehab is completely uncalled for. He is an innocent bystander to the drama as of now. I can't believe the mods let that shit go on.

No. 10523

>>10511
At least the whole sisters thing seems resolved and the thread is back on track, I hope those spergs don't come back and clutter it up again

No. 10524

>>10520
You're an insufferable newfag. You can have your thread and you can watch it die down. Now stop speaking as the "vast majority" of users.
>>10522
>>10521
I'll personally take a look at this right now.

No. 10525

>>10524
Speaking as someone who didn't post once about the eunuch sisters, I found these threads highly entertaining and the mods' decision to lock the threads and keep them in the art-salt thread completely retarded.
So what if the thread ends up dying down? Plenty of threads on /snow/ are semi-dead already.

No. 10526

>>10525
Now there are three threads and the situation has become really autistic compared to the level of milk involved.

No. 10527

>>10526
All of this drama could have been avoided if it wasn't for the mods' fuck-up and yet the admin's post above is so salty.

No. 10528

>>10527
the refusal to unlock it and fucking weird suggestions like 'take it to gender crit' spawned this. the staff salt is unbelievable. yes there is a degree of autism in the thread to start with but being so pissed you can't go back and unlock a mildly autistic thread about two strange girls when you have baylee, shayna, and pnp threads all still pumping along is really something.

I got a mod message about using the old thread but currently a new thread is most active, which one are staff wanting us to use?

No. 10529

All these eunuch spergs need to be fucking gassed, you're more autistic than the cows themselves. Give it a goddamn rest already.

No. 10530

>>10529
>implying it's not selfposting

No. 10532

Can mods keep an extra eye on the shay thread? It’s 20 posts in and pure autism due to some random girl dying from Shays past and an anon keeps bringing up that she died. And then rando girl’s friends are coming in all >LEAVE HER ALONE!!

No. 10533

>>10530
>selfposting so much that you write 2000 pages worth of milk about yourself solely on the russian side of the internet for 4 years and then study english and lolcow for 3+ years so you can finally make a thread about yourself
>use different VPNs and devices all to circumvent any samefag detection and get the mods to let you selfpost more and talk to yourself
this happens

No. 10534

>>10530
I wouldn't be surprised if it was. I haven't seen farmers chimp out over something this petty in ages and it can't be more than 3 or 4 people behind 90% of the sperging. I hate the summer.

No. 10535

>>10533
sorry about your autism, but when half the posts are about how "beautiful" the art is it's super obvious. something is wrong with you, go back to your thread.

No. 10536

>>10535
take your medication, you sound unwell. admin would've called it out long ago if that were the case

No. 10537

Why was the rad fem thread locked?

No. 10538

>>10535
there are like 3 out of 150 posts (in the latest thread) saying the art is beautiful, everyone else is just laughing at them.
Also have you seen how they write in english? Their english is almost broken and they have a very distinct typing style I have yet to see in their threads.

No. 10539

All this talk got me to actually read through these eunuch threads and what the actual fuck, mods/admin/this random pissy anon are being incredibly petty/retarded over this.

The poster who mentioned that milk doesn't always have to be drama (and referenced PT) is 100% right. Finding it harder and harder to believe current staff/posters were even around for old /cgl/ threads if they don't see how this fits in almost perfectly with a classic cow-case.

God I was hopeful/praising when new Admin took over. This site just cannot have any good staff for the long term, shits obviously getting to their heads between this and other recent petty behaviors.

No. 10540

>>10539
How long are you autists gonna complain about this? You got your stupid thread, stay inside it.

No. 10541

>>10540
First time I've posted about it, since as my post states I've only now even looked at these threads.

My complaint isn't about this topic getting a thread, it's about the shitty mod-admin response to it that is another indication to the nitpicky/petty way they've been dealing with things.

Perhaps you need to check your spectrum before screeching autist since any mention of this eunuch topic apparently sends you into a fury, as evident by your lack of reading comprehension.

No. 10542

Admin, if you are going to call out this >>10524 person for being an insufferable newfag (which I am not doubting that they are), can you call out the other side with this obvious instigating, 'tism obsessed anon:
>>10540
>>10535
>>10529

No. 10543

>>10540
imagine thinking it's all one anon. 'tism indeed.

No. 10544

>>10539
Same for me, turns out they're likely the most interesting cows we've had since a long time.

No. 10545

admin please do something about the summerfags. clearly giving them their own thread didn't fix it because they are still reeing here.

No. 10546

I'm impressed that some mentally ill girl's dickgirl art created the biggest conflict of the year on Lolcow.

No. 10547

>>10546
Summer heat makes everybody a little bit crazy

No. 10548

Everyone posting in the eunuch thread should be banned for life after the level of derailing and samefagging that went on in here, holy shit.

No. 10549

>>10537
Should be fixed.
inb4 another grand conspiracy
>>10539
I had no idea about the thread until 2 days after the fact my farmhands handled it in the way the saw fit. They can have their own thread in /snow/ given it meets the /snow/ guidelines.
The original thread was unlocked so what's the issue?
>>10541
Perhaps because it's been the same 3-4 anons ban evading, samefagging, and sperging about it for days?
>>10542
This is childish tattle-telling. If it was the same person they would be called out as I usually do on /meta/.
>>10545
Summerfags get banned, and some ban evade. Threads don't need to be banned if it's a valid topic, the shit anons just need to integrate or [get banned].

No. 10550

>>10549
i could care less if they have a thread or not but they won't stop derailing and samefagging every thread about it. this thread, and even random threads on /ot/.

No. 10552

>>10550
If admin is admitting that she had no idea of her farmhand's actions, and that they undid said actions because the thread does indeed meet /snow/ standards, then how is it derailing to come to the thread made for complaints to… complain?

You really don't see the irony in your own commentary, do you?

>>10548
>>10549

If the jist of the complaints about the Eunuch thread have been select samefagging and ban-evading, then why is everyone who believes the thread to be milky being called spergs and punished for it?

My original point stands that the farmhands reacted harshly and prematurely to a new topic, something that, spergy samefagging newfags or not, has the potential to hinder the growth/overall "milk"/"cows" of the site in the long run.

I have already expressed my feelings that farmhands are selectively banning based on personal bias/differing opinions to topics, and that complaining about Eunuch on here is considered spergy derailing, but screeching that those posters should be banned/are autists isn't, just makes it appear even more like a double standard at play. (ie. "they agree with me, so I'm letting it slide").

It can be repeated that we as regular users can't understand/see the back-end/inner workings of staff/site, but blindly believing that is exactly how this site went downhill at the hands of past Admin's. This entire incident is just a tiny drop in a bigger bucket.

No. 10553

>>10549

>the original thread was unlocked


A new thread was started and is being used, so the original thread should be relocked to avoid confusion.

No. 10554

>>10552
I think you misunderstood admin. The bulk of the anons who believe the Eunuch thread to be milky have been samefagging, ban-evading, and generally acting like children, not the other way around. About four anons were behind the vast majority of the sperging, one of which has been evading a permaban for weeks.

No. 10555

>>10549
>been the same 3-4 anons
this is disregarding anyone who casually read the thread and added comment about the unusual banning of it here. I didn't ban evade, samefag or sperg and I can't be the only one.

>original thread was unlocked

that's not even the thread in use now. there's absolutely been some autism involved in the making of all the threads but since it was dictated that it go to some pretty odd destinations (gender crit?) can't you acknowledge staff reaction to this thread was ott at all. it was staff who triggered at least some of the remaking of this harmlessly wierd thread, perhaps over an incorrectly perceived slight about gender politics or fetishes. look at what staff did and why.

No. 10556

>>10554
you're using this blanket label pretty conveniently. I've no doubt all those people you describe exist in the thread but you're making it sound like not a single rule-following user is reading or posting (or have been attempting to while the thread relocated). which is bullshit, sorry. I'm not here to disrespect you but don't twist this like staff had no choice but to suggest the thread go to gender crit.

No. 10557

>>10554
I don't think I misunderstood at all. I understand there are ban evading, samefagging sperg anons that were for the thread.

But there are also anons and staff in this thread and the others related, calling everyone spergs and acting like we're unjustified in complaining that this subject is classic cow material. Unless you are saying I misunderstood and those are also ban evaders…

Which I sort of doubt since at the end of one of the eunuch threads some anon says "there must be something wrong with you tards considering you weren't supposed to make a new thread for this." And the farmhand quotes it to say "this".

Even if that thread shouldn't have been made and that anon wasn't wrong, in any other context that'd be pegged as infighting, derailing or mini modding. But instead it's a farmhand agreeing with it because it agrees with their opinion.

Is it really this beyond you guys to take a step back and realize the way this was handled was shitty regardless of samefags, shows an underlining issue with what at least one farm hand believes to be "proper action" and give a bit more transparency (like was originally promised)? That entire thread and this one could've been ban evading sperging samefags and it wouldn't change anything I just said…?

No. 10558

>>10557
Not everyone is a sperg but the 4 anons who samefagged in here are.

There isn't anything wrong with the thread topic itself so I unlocked what I believed to be the original thread.
Either way continuously remaking threads (like repzilla) is generally bad practice.
By the way, we ban based off of patterns of behavior and the severity of an offense, not minor incidents. One snarky comment isn't going to equate to an anons whose post history consists of infighting.

No. 10562

Admin is based.

No. 10563

Can we talk about the doxxing in the TND thread? I see some of the posts are removed but plenty are still up. Anons accuse her of doxxing herself when all she did was mention the city she was in (once in an IG story) and posting pics from inside the house. Uhh yeah of course you can put it together with some sleuthing but why is it okay to post your findings in the thread? How is her location or speculation about which exact sober living home she’s in any way milky?

No. 10564

>>10563
Yeah the obsessive amount of trying to figure out where she lives and sharing it is too far. If you're crazy enough to doxx her then just say "she lives in a ___ type place now" and nothing else. Posting exact location is uncalled for.

I think TND's thread is full of crazy junkies like sex worker threads are full of jealous sex workers.

No. 10565

>>10563
>>10564
No street addresses, phone numbers, or places of employment, *unless* the subject has published that information publicly on their social media.
>How is her location or speculation about which exact sober living home she’s in any way milky?
I don't know, I don't have a fixation or hero complex.

I will say though, onion anons have done far worse. People will be autistic and do shit regardless. Obviously anything violating the rules will be removed.

EDIT: she essentially doxxed herself
I don't even protect farmers who doxx themselves.

No. 10566

>>10565

The post that identified the sober living house was deleted.

No. 10567

>>10565

The more we know about the program she is in, the more we catch her in her lies.

No. 10568

>>10564
>I think TND's thread is full of crazy junkies like sex worker threads are full of jealous sex workers.
ime this sort of thing is endemic to gossip sites in general; even with heavy moderation you're going to get both a ton of deranged celebrity-enchanted losers who want to save the cow and think that they're helping them by shitposting on the gossip site and a ton of deranged jealous/bitter losers who are unable to accept that a cow has any remotely redeeming qualities or makes any remotely good decisions in order to try and tear them down a peg. Compared to other major gossip sites, lolcow has the least of this by far but it's still a part of almost every thread, even going back to the first few dakota threads.

No. 10569

>>10568
it's different because there are also a lot of people interested in different areas of animal care in there, snakes, reptiles, rats etc. there isn't just one group, and there are a lot of anons with no idea about drugs or tattoos.

shay threads really just are a pack of rabid camgirls and their sympathisers.

No. 10570

>>10569
They must be hella lurking then bc it's been junkietalk for a few threads now.

No. 10571

Since we’re already talking about the TND thread(s) can we do something about the bunch of ‘oh hai Taylor’ posts?
There’s also so much tinfoiling, reaching etc it’s basically becoming fan fiction at this point. A little more moderation would be nice, if possible…

I also wish there was a way to actually stop cow tipping since it seems like a ton of people are directly asking her things on Twitter that have been questioned on here. (I know there’s no way to realize this. Just complaining into the void.)

No. 10572

>>10571
There's a ton of alogging and hysteria too. Some of the posters sound like they're from straight outta websleuths and are acting like she's 'a psychopath' for things like making obvious jokes and getting pissed that she was doxxed. It's fun to get swept up in the more plausible tinfoil but some of the anons in that thread are seriously unhinged

No. 10573

Fucking lock the old threads if you don't want people accidently posting in them. I bet you powertripping shitheads like public bans/warns so much that you leave dead threads open on purpose.

And before you asked no I haven't accidently necroed any threads recently. i just feel like it's not the posters' fault.

No. 10574

>>10573
I do think they are unlocked to punish people for not integrating or paying attention as you said. That has to be on purpose.

Leaving old threads unlocked just to get a few hits on a few careless anons is actually a bad call. The confusion it causes isn't worth getting to ban a couple anons here and there.

No. 10575

File: 1562677983370.png (40 KB, 708x259, dumb.png)

Hurt feelings isn't a valid ban reason. If you want to ban for 'derailing' I understand, it's just a bit harder to justify that when there's only two posts been made with one being a misquote.

I didn't even know I was banned because I'd been gone the entire night. Don't make me cringe with this petty shit.

No. 10576

>>10570
she doesn't have her animals or post about them much at all, and her whole life is about drug talk and recovery right now. this seems nitpicky that you don't want pople to talk about drugs in there.

No. 10579

>>10575
sounds like you were infighting. why can’t you just take your ban and go, it literally expired before it could even impede your posting. you’re complaining for the sake of complaining, i’d ban you too kek

No. 10580

>>10564
>TND’s thread is full of crazy junkies

you bet your ass it is. i’ve reported countless posts for blogging, usually it’s “omg she’s such an idiot when i was a heroin addict i did THIS therefore she’s lying” and “i’m a current addict and i use subs to get high in between fixes” (that one is literally almost verbatim) it’s massive cringe

No. 10581

>>10579
The point is just say the ban is for infighting. Nobody wants to read farmhands botch memes with their ESL.

No. 10582

>>10579
same anon, i always get a laff seeing people complain about their bans looking for asspats. just take it and go, we all get them from time to time and they're pretty inconsequential. i'd rather mods be more generous with bans if it means scaring away summerfags in the process.

No. 10583

>>10575
It wasn't for hurt feelings, you were sperging out at anons over belle delphine so you were given a 30 minute ban.
>>10581
>botch memes
>ESL
None of those things have anything to do with the ban.

No. 10584

>>10583
I'm not saying it had anything to do with that ban. The line where the reason for the ban usually goes is a botched meme that makes the farmhand sound like an infighter that was given some power.
Sorry but whoever you appointed sounds like an immature sperg themselves.

No. 10585

Sometimes blog posting is helpful. I feel like the contributing information with personal experiences vs. textbook can make a difference, and give more perspective.
Obviously it's a difficult line to draw for those that go on for a month about their dead father, but sometimes the information is actually useful.

No. 10586

>>10584
Ok bud but farmhand's message to your butthurt ass in the ban screen was funny and you need to get over yourself.

No. 10587

>>10581
are you fucking ESL?

No. 10588

>>10585
it's possible to give useful information from a position of experience of expertise without referring to oneself. we all have to follow that rule even if we have personal experiences that make us relate really hard to the thread. it can easily be avoided and those who do it should think twice before adding a sentence that starts with "I-"

No. 10589

Not complaining about my ban, just asking to avoid making the same mistake in the future.

Where exactly do you draw the line with nitpicking in the Momokun thread? After all her weight/appearance/how she presents herself is kinda part of the 'joke'. I get that 'haha she fat' posts desperately need to be kept at bay, but there's the 'just calling her fat is no contribution' rule.
Wouldn't >>>/pt/678729 be considered nitpicking, too?

Again, not complaining, just wondering because it's really hard to tell what is and what isn't considered nitpicking.

No. 10590

>>10586
>was funny
Not really. It's cringe.

No. 10591

>>10589
can you really not see the difference in saying 'moo is fat' and pointing out that she moved part of her fat?

No. 10592

>>10589
>it's really hard to tell what is and what isn't considered nitpicking
Welcome to lolcow moderation 101. Everything is dependent on the mood of the farmhand at the time.

No. 10593

Some racebaiting spergs are shitting up the /unpopular opinions thread for 2 days (Indians smells so bad…abloobloo…Germans are awful…abloobloo…Europeans are shitty and I'm glad they'll be replaced…) It seems that /poltards summerfags are all over the place again. Can you please do something? Thank you dear Admin and Farmhands.

No. 10594

>>10591
Are you retarded? The post literally is just ‘lol she’s holding up her fat belly’. People have been banned for nitpicking for way more substantial posts.
And I wasn’t banned for just calling her fat so idek what you’re trying to tell me?

No. 10595

>>10594
you didn't even post your fucking ban. you probably got banned because all your posts are autistic, like your posts here.

No. 10596

>>10595
What the fuck is your problem?
Why does it trigger you so much that I’m asking for a more detailed definition of what’s considered nitpicking?

No. 10597

>>10596
NTA but I didn't see it as bitching or whatever the other anon is accusing you of. What needs to be acknowledged by the mod team is that there is pretty much no substance to momo other than making fun of her appearance so mocking her is actually pretty much on topic. It's not like Gurg, Margo, or Trasha where there's more to the cow. Some of the cows on this site are like momo, they're just ugly and annoying. The justification for momo being a cow is shit like "uhhhh sexual harassment" but really people are there to gawk at her disgusting appearance. There is fucking nothing to her.

No. 10598

File: 1562776170781.jpg (163.63 KB, 1080x1012, IMG_20190710_182629.jpg)

>>10593
Yes, you banned me a week for posting pic related, but hating on entire countries (or a whole continent) is somehow less bad and not racist/banworthy?

No. 10599

>>10585
imo it depends on the board. If you're blogging in /ot/ or /g/, fine. If you're blogging on /pt/ or /snow/, get rekt.

No. 10600


No. 10601

>>10597
I mean there are things besides the sexual harrassment, like her inaccurate/low effort 'cosplays', her imaginary diet and workouts, the scamming by saying she's going to donate money… The milk is there, but isn't as frequent, so her obvious lies about her weight and the way she presents herself offer a lot more to talk about.
If it's too nitpicky for /pt/ maybe moving it to /snow/ would be an option?

No. 10602

>>10597
that doesn't mean the rest of us want to read a bunch of posts sperging about her jowls or cankles. we all know she's a dumb cunt who doesn't care how fat she's gotten

No. 10603

>>10602
Well if we had clear info like
>laughing about that she's gripping her fupa to show her vag is okay
>talking about her pudgy face or how her surgeries have gone to waste isn't
(even though that still seems kinda arbitrary) it wouldn't be so hard to stick to the rules.
But either way, there's a bunch of people who apparently do enjoy talking about this kind of thing (to some extent) and it's not up to you to decide who gets banned for what.

No. 10604

>>10603
it's not up to you either, stop being a sperg.

No. 10605

Farmhands have been exceptionally proactive about obvious male spergs and summerfags. Just straight deleting bait instead of letting it fester for newfags to boost.

Very grateful and proud of admin and farmhands. Thanks friends.

No. 10606

>>10605
thank you anon

No. 10607

I don't have any complaints, so I want to say thank you to the current admin & farmhands! You are doing a great job and make this site a pleasure to use, especially compared to the previous admin(s) who were all over the place imo. Again, thank you. I am very grateful for the effort you put in and the work you do.

No. 10609

>>10605
I have also noticed how quickly some dumb scrote posts were deleted. Good work!

No. 10610

>>10607
This. We love you farm team !

No. 10611

I got a temporary ban from misspelling my report on a post. A few letter difference. I had no idea this was against the rules?

No. 10612

These new farmhand really need to get a grip on reality(Ban evading)

No. 10613

>>10611
It isn't against the rules. Sorry if this happened but I don't see the ban.

No. 10614

File: 1562956333911.jpeg (314.35 KB, 1242x989, 22F5719D-A55D-489F-9144-3429DE…)


No. 10615

>>10614
How long was the ban? I think sometimes farmhands issue bans as a 'warning'. I've seen like 1-2 minute bans just to tell me something/correct me.

No. 10616

>>10614
You were not banned over a report. You were banned for being an obvious summerfag through your misuse of "sperging" and your defense of cowtipping..
You deserved the one minute ban

No. 10617

>>10616
My phone autocorrected. I apologize. I was under the impression that I was banned because the ban stated it was because of “sperg” not “spurg” not the other things mentioned. So thanks for letting me know!

No. 10618

anything we can do about the wk in shay's thread besides reporting??

No. 10619

Whenever I see a public ban message in the midst of an argument I automatically assume that the banned poster was unknowingly arguing with the mod/admin.

I can't be the only one who's thinking this, right?

No. 10621

So I was going back in time to the early TND threads to read up on the early drama. I could not find anything before the first thread in snow nor the general petubers before thread 1. Petubers thread 1 linked to the first TND thread. Is there anything before the first TND and Petubers thread?

No. 10622

please keep the anime critical thread and lock the anti-anime thread if you want to lock one of them. anti anime is spergy and not even on the right board.

No. 10623

>>10622
You're both equally spergy to outsiders and that thread was there before /m/ even existed, newfag. "Anime critical" discussion could just be moved back into the normal anime thread anyways, it's all the same autistic weebs.

I've never posted in either thread before you accuse me of being an anti animufag.

No. 10624

Thanks for deleting the minor photos in the ProJared/Holly Conrad/DCA/GG thread

No. 10626

>>10623
why the fuck do you care, just hide the threads wannabe normie-chan instead of trying to police them. let us sperg in our designated autism thread(s). go back to LPA if you mind

No. 10628

Not sure if this is the correct thread, but it seems we're being brigaded by either a single or multiple males. There are 2 gifs of women being beaten up on onion's thread. Not sure what brought this on, maybe simple male barbarism.

No. 10632

What is the point of sage in PT if you’re just going to ban people for using it properly

No. 10634

>>10632
sage isnt a pass to break rules or act like a tard.

No. 10635

File: 1563265599653.gif (1.84 MB, 220x220, giphy(4).gif)

ITT;
>Summerfags are too dumb to realise if their posts start with "I.." or "As a professional/diagnosed Y I can…" It's blog posting and to instead use third person. Hint : no one cares about your personal experience as a professional retard or about you performing lobotomy n yourself to become one. Just use third person, why would you even want to admit that shit?

>Summerfags are too dumb to realise they don't need to comment on everything.


>Summerfags are too dumb to realise sageing a post doesn't allow breaking rules.


>Summerfags are too self centered and think mods target them because they get banned a lot, instead of realising there's probably a handful of staff and tens of thousands of visitors daily on this site. Instead, it must be farmhand ran farm surveillance targeting poor diagnosed professional retard from reddit/tumblr/twitter


>Summerfags are so dumb that they think all bans are redtexted, not because that particular post got reported a lot.


>Summerfags are so dumb, they think this is like Reddit where you'll get asspats for sharing your retarded idea.


Summerfags will probably think this doesn't apply to them. It does.

Your personal opinion or experience * doesn't matter " when it comes to cows, unless you intend to become one. If that's the case, good luck.

No. 10639

File: 1563318009909.gif (193.36 KB, 220x146, tenor (1).gif)

>>10607
>>10609
>>10610
Thank you for your kind words of encouragement anons!

No. 10640

Things are getting crazy in the TND thread round two different kids. First a few hours back there's he stepparent of some poor kid who had to spend time with their heroin-addicted mother and Jonny Craig. It isn't really milk and she's mainly come to bitch about her custody situation and exploit the kid some more.

Now anons have gone nuts chasing after Jake's possible 11yo kid, naming him and telling everyone where to find him on facebook. Taylor doxed Jake so who cares, he's a grown up.

No. 10641

>>10640
also now an anon thinks its cute to run through possible sober livings for Taylor's bf. that's not a self-dox by Taylor. I'm not a whiteknight, I can figure out where they're each staying and would post it if the circumstances were right, but it's just summerfags going nuts at this point.

No. 10642

>>10641
The TND thread(s) got out of control a few threads ago already. They basically consist of cow tipping screenshots, ‘I’m a recovering addict myself so I know that …’ blogposts and nitpicking nowadays. And none of the mods seemed to care back then so why should they now.

No. 10643

>>10642
I don't think that thread's gonna recover until TND actually does get sober so people can go back to nitpicking her animal care. I think she's /snow/ tier now and not really /pt/ caliber. Then again looking at the cows that are active on /pt/, most of them also aren't that good anymore. It's a board of dried ass milk at this stage.

No. 10644

File: 1563409676021.jpeg (509.43 KB, 1242x1086, 8147A354-AD15-4E26-A59D-9DADDF…)

Okay seriously can someone explain to me how re-posting an already posted picture with just an insult is neither nitpicking nor ‘no contribution’?

No. 10645

>>10642
I think all the junkie blogging, well it's a pita but she didn't relapse so that's chilled out, I've noticed. To me it's like when the snakefags post the obesity chart for the umpteenth time, or remember the cat bowl sperg anon from the old threads? Right now I'm genuinely concerned about the summerfag "let's dox everyone and everything reee it's public information" attitude in there. We're minutes or hours away from someone posting her sober living address and for no good reason at all.

>>10643
I don't think she'll be getting properly sober for a long while, since her recovery's already a mess. If you don't like the storyline it doesn't mean she's due for a downgrade. Taylor belongs in /pt/, she's a huge cow who just bought a gun with the help of a felon then stored it illegally to protect herself from… lolcow. Cmon.

No. 10646

>>10644
Not all bans are redtexted, anon. But I went back and added some just 4 u.

No. 10647

File: 1563432514929.gif (2.61 MB, 400x225, giphy(5).gif)

>>10644
How fitting, just should have scroll a bit.
>>10635

No. 10648

>>10647
its funny how you seem like a newfag yourself. no one is patting you on the ass for your shitty LA gifs and pointing out the obvious.

No. 10649

Shouldn't this be in /snow/?

>>>/pt/681844

No. 10650

Now that Kelly's thread is active again, can Admin and Farmhands look out for her selfposting?

>>10645

We wouldn't have been aware of half of her lies if we hadn't known program she was enrolled in.

No. 10651

Can it please become bannable to derail over pronouns, in either direction? Something in the rules to just not comment on what pronouns other people use when referring to the subject of threads, at least outside of /ot/? There are TERFs and SJWs using this website so there can never be agreement, everyone needs to stfu.

No. 10652

>>10650
I agree and don't have a problem with the first place being revealed, nor the second if she blatantly puts it out there. I'm talking about just running through places to fill the time. Leave it until she doxes her own self.

No. 10653

Can we stop with locking new threads before the previous one hits 1200? It leads to shit threads. If someone makes a new one after 1100 posts, someone competent has time to update it and do it correctly. If we have to wait until 1200 then someone just scrambles to do it asap and it ends up as a shit thread.

This is the second Holly/Projared thread with an absolute shit thread, where OP has just copied and pasted the previous thread's OP word for word, and not updated any of the info, even though there's been a TON of new milk since the last one and used a terrible thread pic. They didn't even link the correct previous thread. Now the conversation is continuing, and the new thread is a mess. I'd offer to make the new thread, but there's no time to sit down and catch up on all the entire thread's last milk. The current one is >>>/snow/841232 and the one you previously had to lock for being a shit OP was >>>/snow/836002.

Again, this has only started happening since you've stopped us from making new threads after 1100.

No. 10655

>>10653
I feel like this is a problem with newfag/s in the particular thread as well, maybe even the same moron twice. If a good thread was made and locked to wait it would help -maybe.

No. 10656

>>10653
The issue is that newfags are impatient and copy and paste the old thread description to just have a thread up. The thread gets automatically locked after 1200 posts, you can still make a thread before the 1200 post warning, you just need to know the balance of when to post the new thread. I find the 1150-1180 post range is the golden area where farmers won’t bitch at you for making the thread too early.

No. 10657

>>10649
No, unlike most people on here, he's a straight up cow.

No. 10658

File: 1563736310357.png (35.69 KB, 493x219, screenshot6.png)

>>10656
Except that's not what we were told? We were specifically told to not make new threads until the last one was full. And because of that it seems like anyone decent too afraid to make the thread before that, even if they have all the new info locked and loaded ready to go past 1100. Then they miss the very specific >1200 window. This thread in particular basically already had the entire new OP written up (and posted) and multiple votes for new OP pics, and the newfag just ignored all of that to copy and paste the old OP and use literally the 2nd pic that comes up when you google "projared".

What happened with pic related was someone made a (competent) thread a good bit after 1100, people went over to the new thread and continued the convo there, that thread then got locked and we got sent back to the old thread to restart the conversation we were having on the new thread for like, <50 posts or whatever and THEN we could have the new one unlocked to then have to restart the conversation again over there. If we now have to wait until 1200, people go until it gets totally locked, then some newfag creates a new thread, and then that new thread is never actually linked in the old thread, because it's already been maxed out to the point where no one else can post.

For what purpose? I don't understand what difference it makes? I could see it being an issue if it was being done at like, 900-1000 or if it was a thread that was moving at a glacial pace past 1100 with no new milk, but the Jared/Holly threads are constantly moving? It just makes everything a giant mess. We've already had enough of an issue keeping the threads linear with people always trying to change the topic, why add this issue on top of it? If we keep having to remake the shit threads or restart the conversation over and over again perfectly good milk just falls through the cracks.

No. 10659

>>10619
Its incredibly obvious when one entire side of the argument is banned and the other isn't. Pathetic.

No. 10660

>>10657
but was there a decision about this anywhere? he just seems as annoying as any other troon and as shitty as those zoophiles were.

No. 10661


No. 10662

>>10660
NTA, but I think it's that he's actually documented as personally harassing multiple women and children IRL, taken them to court, and ruined several of their careers for not pandering to his ball-waxing fetish that sets him apart.
I do agree the zoophiles belonged in /pt/, now that you mention it, but it's probably too late for that now.

No. 10663

>>10660
He's worse. He's more /pt/ worthy than Luna or TND.

No. 10664

>>10409
we basically had one during the last few months of former admin's reign and every second of it was fucking terrible, we don't need another.

No. 10665

>>10662
well yea, but that goes back to my question. not saying he shouldn't or should go there, but usually mods move non-established cow threads on /pt/ within minutes unless it's been talked about.

No. 10666

Welp, it's summer, Eugenia is hot news, and the bloggers are out in force. The Shane Dawson thread is turning into r/raisedbynarcissists and the anachans are forming a hug circle in heir own thread again (as they do) to argue about food and also to keep trying to insert Eugenia.

No. 10667

>>10665
Because mods ARE aware of how much of a cow he is. He isn't JUST a troon like other anon said, he does cow behaviour that goes beyond "muh transbian"
The rules haven't changed, he just actually belongs in /pt/

No. 10668

what is with the fucking ~le epic cringelord~ in shayna's thread??? they're acting like the first person to ever use a vpn to ban evade on top of it all.

No. 10669

File: 1563843492532.png (35.18 KB, 422x760, 54F51930-3EBE-45E2-8B68-C30F1A…)

Is the farmhand in charge of the Belle thread ok????

No. 10670

>>10669
should be more concerned about the farmers posting that shit. what a dumpster

No. 10671

>>10670
agreed. all those instances were from different days anyway and people have requested more red text.

No. 10672

>>10669
Are the anons in the belle thread okay? All of those posts deserved to get redtexted. How many of them were yours?

No. 10673

>>10672
Kek this.

No. 10674

File: 1563892205834.jpg (110.47 KB, 720x975, IMG_20190723_102849.jpg)

This post wasn't off topic or derailing so why was it banned. It was even saged. This is very frustrating

No. 10676

>>10674
You think it might've been the blogging?

No. 10680

>>10676
It was on topic about Phoebe complaining about concerts not having safe spaces for people with extreme anxiety and panic attacks. I still think it wasn't warranted since it was my only reply on that thread.

No. 10681

>>10680
blogposting is against the rules and nobody cares

No. 10682

>>10680
it was blogging, anon

No. 10683

>>10667 I came to /meta to find a thanks thread for putting Yaniv in the /pt. Well done mods, this cow gives full cream milk.

To anyone else to doesn't understand why he's there should maybe go read the KF thread for old milk. This guy is a horrorshow and 100% deserves to be in the /pt.

No. 10684

>>10682
Ok, I'll keep that in mind

No. 10686

>>10473
Seconding this. A lot of people are mistaking the 1100 notification for the 1200 one and making threads too early. Maybe instead of rewording it, it could just be taken out? Everything goes slow enough that two warnings are a little bit overkill, and a warning is only necessary once the thread is actually locked.

No. 10687

Can the mods chill the fuck out a bit? They constantly ban posts that have not broke any rules other than they disagree with what has been said. That's not how you run a discussion board and frankly getting sick of it. And it's not just my posts, happening to lots of people. Relevant discussion going on to the topic at hand and everyone gets banned. Someone asked why a cow has friends and I posted 'She has money' and then I was banned for a week with no explanation.. why?? Post did not break any rules, was saged etc. Now I've been banned again asking why a particular cow is relevant any more as she is a nobody doesn't do anything any more. Again, what rule has this broke? Sort it out please, it's pathetic.

No. 10688

>>10683
>>10667
I'm >>10665 and again my question was more for the mods, since it seems that they knew the status already. I was just wondering what they had to say about these situations, where cows are /pt/ material because of their status elsewhere, and how that's determined etc.

No. 10689

>>10687
I’m assuming we have new mods on the team who are obnoxiously trigger happy because I’m noticing I’ll get banned for something for one day, then after that ban I’ll be banned for some other comment for three days, then banned for something else for one day and it’s like… can you relax? Just give a warning instead or maybe bundle them? The rules are so random. I’ve been banned for things others were allowed to post and then avoided banning even when I was purposely being a shithead. Makes me not want to come here as much though I doubt the mods care

No. 10690

>>10689
Most anons don't have that problem. Getting banned over an over again indicates autism on your end.

No. 10691

>>10689
It seems you are the problem, then? I've been on this site for idk, almost 2 years? And I can count the bans I've gotten on one hand. If you follow the rules, you'll be fine. You were also ban evading, right? Which is a surefire way to piss any mod off. You are causing your own problems, anon.

No. 10692

>>10688
Yaniv is not a relatively new cow, he just hasn't had an active thread on here
>>10689
There are new no mods or janitors. The Belle Delphine thread is really just that bad.
>>10687
Please appeal or email me at admin@lolcow.farm if this is happening so I can look into the post and mods involved

No. 10693

>>10687
>>10689
Lol came here to post just this. The amount of unnecessary bans going on right now is insane. Nitpicking or blogging bans everywhere when it is relevant to the discussion and is hardly either. People get baited and then banned when they respond but the baiters/trolls that incited the fight don't? What's up with that? Depends on where the mod stands on the issue and they take sides, even encouraging the fight by banning the person being attacked and labelling it 'Autism', an actual employer would sack them immediately for such despicable behaviour. Is there not a rule that bans armchair diagnosing? which mods themselves are frequently breaking, not setting the greatest example.

No. 10694

>>10693
lol i don't think they're actually diagnosing you as being autistic, anon. you might be though.

No. 10695

>>10693
Don't insult me and pretend your samefagging isn't obvious. >>10687
>>10693

>an actual employer would sack them immediately for such despicable behaviour.

kek

No. 10696

File: 1563966517587.jpg (41.48 KB, 500x333, 4527714-7474432124-large.jpg)

>>10693
this is the funniest post in this thread
>an actual employer would sack them immediately for such despicable behaviour.
>they do it for free

No. 10697

>>10691
What do you mean ban evading? I waited for my ban to end then I was later banned again for a comment in the same thread I had made BEFORE the original ban. If you’re going to ban someone multiple times in a row for something that other people are doing it feels like a grudge. I also have been pretty blunt in my appeals before if I felt it was unfair so maybe it is a grudge.

No. 10698

File: 1563982503412.jpg (18.56 KB, 400x320, kekinputin.jpg)

>>10697
>thinking Farmhands have a time limit for banning a post
You're too autistic for Lolcow, congrats.

No. 10699

>>10697
I can top that. My ban expired so started posted again and was banned immediately for ban evading. Figure that on out.(samefagging, yet again.)

No. 10700

>>10699
>(samefagging, yet again.)
topkek

No. 10701

>>10699
are people really this stupid…? jesus christ.

No. 10703

>>10687 (Original complaint)
>>10693 (yes, samefag herp derp)
>>10699 (A continuation, my ban expired but I'm now getting banned for evasion. The ban has expired ffs)

These are my only posts, yes one is a samefag I admit. The others are not me. Are you really this stupid? I don't know if people pretending to be me to shit stir or genuinely have the same complaint and just so happen to type in the same style which doesn't help but those are my only posts. I post in lots of threads but only ever get banned in the Shay thread, and why is that?(Ban evasion)

No. 10704

>>10703
This summer has been a long hot one. Do you willingly choose to not learn anything or are you really this dense?

No. 10706

>>10703
You know samefagging is against the rules, right? At this point it's getting pretty obvious why you keeping getting banned, you absolute walnut.

No. 10707

>>10703
Just leave for a bit, you won't win.

I've literally been banned because the retarded moderation misinterpreted what I posted or thought I was a scrote (the latter which gets appealed but is annoying nonetheless).
Just accept that the bitches can do whatever they want with impunity and lay low. It's too much effort to fight stupid shit and hopefully the next cycle won't be so retarded. It's been this way for forever.

No. 10708

is it me or is there a huge amount of transphobia and homophobia on this site?

calling trans women "troons" and even having a whole thread dedicated to mocking them when you're supposedly a female friendly imageboard, trans women ARE women. theyre born female and die female. they belong here.

also calling people fags… i thought hating gays was out of fashion now. turns out a bunch of angry women are still mad that gay men wont fuck them.

i think the admin and mods should try and make this a more inclusive place if they want more users. maybe ban hate speech of all kinds? no racism, fatphobia, transphobia, homophobia, sexism, misogyny, or any kind of whorephobia.

make this an imageboard women want to come too and realise theyre safe

peace ✌

No. 10709

>>10708
learn image board culture faggot

No. 10710

File: 1564026095541.png (225.05 KB, 854x482, 9AEB58E8-113E-4DD2-BA9C-2B6250…)


No. 10711

File: 1564026441085.gif (958.51 KB, 280x217, 1558988724563.gif)

>>10708
This can't be real, lmao

No. 10712

>>10708
Angry troon detected

No. 10714

>>10708
this post made me realize i am safe from all the BS "phobias" the troon mentioned. thanks admin/mods for making this an imageboard women want to come to!

No. 10715

>>10670
>>10671
then

why don't they just put the belle thread on autosage so everyone can jerk off over there and mods can stop chimping out and banning for nothing

if its so useless then why keep it up

No. 10716

>>10707
Yeah, I feel like modding has been really inconsistent and less transparent lately

No. 10717

>>10715
because belle has some interesting milk to discuss why should we just give up the thread because a bunch of autistic 14 year olds shit up the thread the whole time because theyre horny

No. 10718

>>10708
ironic shitposting is still shitposting

No. 10719

>>10312
>>10708

"Trans women ARE women"
that's just your personal opinion, if you get so triggered by people giving their non sjw opinions, you should leave.

No. 10720

>>10715
Imagine being dumb enough to ask Farmhands to stop doing their job.

No. 10721

File: 1564072198450.gif (3.03 MB, 359x202, 1494108465737.gif)

>>10708

Looks like since tumblr is dying a slow death, trannies and sjws are fleeing and trying to infect new places.

Fuck this shit lmao

No. 10722

I don't get why there is an anime critical thread in /m/ when the content is literally the same as the anime general on the same board. I get why it's distinct from anti anime but the discussions taking place are literally just anime general stuff.

No. 10723

Am I the only one thoroughly enjoying all the banning? Like this place has become rampant with blogging, derailing, newfaggotry, and infighting and we all know it's because it's summer. Summer fags always shit up the place for awhile but this has been ridiculous so thank fucking god the farmhands have stepped in to curb their fucking autism. If they have to learn the hard way how to properly integrate, so be it, and if they can't do so, they can fuck off. If you are being banned often, you are the fucking problem. Plenty of us farmers are doing fine with no bans this summer because we actually follow the rules. Stop shitposting and learn how to integrate and you'll be fine.

Keep it up, farmhands. I'm sick of having to wade through all the garbage in my favourite threads because people can't seem to read the damn rules and observe board culture.

No. 10724

>>10722
for the same reason kpop and kpop critical exist.

No. 10725

>>10724
Everyone knows kpop critical is just a euphemism for anti kpop. It's not the same vibe as this new anme critical thread. Anime critical is just a regular anime general where you don't have to rave or rant, it's just an anime general.

No. 10726

File: 1564084569525.jpeg (54.65 KB, 625x626, E4B8AA3F-E6D2-4654-ACE6-2AABC9…)


No. 10727

>>10723
The moderators here have always been excessively ban happy, nothing to do with summer. Also you forgot to sage your post, ban incoming..

No. 10728

>>10727
you sound really salty and newfaggy. farmhands are always more strict in the summer. any oldfag knows this

No. 10729

>>10727
>implying you can get banned for not sageing on fucking /meta/
hello newfag. did you come from shay's thread?

No. 10730

Hey mods sorry if this isn't the right thread to post this but can you guys please ban me permanently? Thanks.

No. 10731


No. 10732

>>10683
>>10692

Should all discussion of Yaniv be in his thread now? Anons in the GC thread continue to discuss Yaniv in the context of GC topics and no one is really discussing him in his thread which is why I questioned starting the thread in the first place.

No. 10733

Request to autosage or lock the Kelly and Chompurrs thread? I know it doesn't get bumped very often, but I don't see the point in her still being able to get attention on here when she wants it.

No. 10736

>>10708
jesus fuck i can't wait till the summerfags are gone

No. 10738

So mods are watching Kevin and Lori self post in their cow thread on /w/ right? I really hope if you tag the posts that we can put in a fat image, it would really piss them off.

No. 10739

Admin has said/agreed they think autosaging threads is pointless and not actually improving thread quality/cop out solution

So why is the shay thread on autosage?

(Yes, I know it's full of shit posters and low quality posts; but autosage doesn't seem to have fixed this or any other thread, so it ends up just being an annoyance to scroll down to it in the catalog). I know some sperg was shitting it up again, but spergs happen around the site all the time – there's no way autosaging gets rid of them if they put in the effort to keep ban-evading

No. 10740

>>10739
If moderating isn't stopping the spergs, the thread should just be locked. No need to do autosage as we all know it doesn't do shit. The better solution to all this is removing the thing spergs wanna talk about.

No. 10741

>>10740
Don't really agree with this either if the sperging isn't leaking out of the thread in question to a massive degree. Almost all cows/flakes end up with spergs; locking the thread/subject over that would leave the entire site bare.

This also punishes users who are not part of the sperg and just enjoy following the petty drama, as well as promotes the idea that you can have your thread removed as long as you get enough WKs to come be problemic enough for you.

Historically I can't think of a flake or cow in snow or pt your proposed solution wouldn't have left a locked thread to.

Also think it'll just make the remaining non spergs and contributing anons leave or discourage quality posts. No point in adding to the discussion when the actions of a few loud anons can have the entire thing taken away because they aren't adhering to punishment. And I have no doubts most of those spergs are more persistent and planning to stick around past thread lock than the average poster.

No. 10742

>>10740
tbh… she deserves the anisa treatment.

No. 10743

>>10741
I did say if the moderation isn't working, aka there is an overwhelming amount of ban evading spergs and the thread is unsalvageable. I was not saying remove threads with any amount of spergs…

No. 10745

can someone please ban the male sperging all over /ot/?

No. 10747

Just noticed that the scrote who made the dick thread in /ot/ got banned.

Why is the thread even still up though?Seriously why should we have to look at a greasy dick.

No. 10748

The posts and screenshots without proof in the TND thread is getting fucking annoying because it turns all the anons against each other and especially because TND and her mom just pass them off as being fake. People then keep posting repetitive "proof??" "fake!" posts. And this has been happening since way back in those threads.
It should maybe be required to screen record messages like the anon did with her father's messages. It shouldn't be a huge inconvenience to someone to just post a quick video like that. Consider it being a bannable offense. I also recognize farmhands probably have worse to deal with, though.

No. 10749

>>10747
They never delete threads they've banned people over. It's been bugging me as well.

No. 10750

Taylor thread is utter shit right now. What can you do mods?

Weird bullshit screenshots coming in, that have no context/no milk. People going on about her random stans, wont shut up about speculation on turtlemom_

It's retarded.

No. 10751

>>10749

Yes, they do. It appears that Farmhands can lock threads but only Admin can delete.

No. 10752

I love this section and I’m so grateful that admin and farmhands actually read/reply.

Sometimes genuine critique can be found, sometimes the tard mik here is better than /pt/. This last week for some reason has been extra fun.

I know when it’s entertaining to us it’s annoying for administration so thanks. It’s been an extra /meta/ entertaining summer!

No. 10754

Anachan General is now an official trash fire. Idk if it's worth reporting any one thing now, I know some of it's redtexted but the derailing rages on.

>>10750
Ugh yes, I've reported a lot of those stan twitter screencap posts, no redtext but they've stopped so I'm assuming bans happened?

No. 10756

>>10752
i agree with this, though i wish anons would let admin/farmhands reply instead of just passive aggressively replying themselves.

No. 10757

I think a mod misunderstood my report? I thought the term "handmaiden" was banned on here (or maybe it was last year for hellweek?) I would never report someone for simply disagreeing with me. Banning on here is all over the place.

No. 10759

Miranda thread is really in the toilet. Can we purge the baby muslimas, they're fucking terrible.

No. 10760

Could something be done about the retarded pedo sperg on /ot/? She (because I want to believe it's only one sped) keeps derailing every fucking thread with pedo accusations/pedo rambling over literally nothing and I can't even decide anymore if it's someone baiting or actually being obnoxious about their obsession with pedos.

No. 10761

File: 1564472129691.png (183.43 KB, 499x311, i-dont-understand-this.png)

>>>/w/60254
Can mods explain the logic of why "Cosplay & Convention General" doesn't belong in /w/? One anon (I assume the one who reported it needing to be moved) said /w/ was only for cows but the board info says
>the following topics and cows:
>Cosplay or costhots
>Lolita
>drama related to any individual or group with an obsession with Japanese culture or a particular trend

Topics of discussion specified include
>Regional Conventions/Cows/Dramu
>Convention Horror Stories
>Seagull Nostalgia/Vintage Milk

& there's other community/general threads that are still there
>Western Vocaloid Community
>Animecore / Early Web Communities
>Gaijin Gyaru
>Lolita Lolcows
>Net-idol/Dance Cover Groups Drama General

It meets every one of the criteria listed above but it still got moved to /g/ immediately. The only criteria it vaguely fits for /g/ is "girly" and "fashion", both of which seem like a stretch/are subjective. Gyaru and Lolita fit those criteria better, even. The board is named "vloggers, lolita, cosplay"…but a Cosplay thread doesn't belong there? Not trying to criticize or anything but I made sure to read all of the rules and info for the board before creating it, so I'm just trying to understand where I went wrong. Should the board rules/info be changed maybe then, if it is only for cows and not for other drama? I tried to make it as general as possible so the Costhot thread wouldn't get clogged with non-thot cosplay drama/personal cows. It's just very confusing.

No. 10762

>>10761
Not a mod but I'm pretty sure it's because /w/ is a drama board and not a general bathroom talk board.

No. 10763

What happened to the lilith levisis thread? It‘s gone?

No. 10764

>>10763
Was wondering the same thing

No. 10765

>>10761
Because those generals are not to discuss and talk about your favorite things in regards to those topics and make friends, but to laugh at and mock their participants.
/g/ is for conversation on fashion, stuff like friend finder generals, health/beauty, relationship stuff, personal hobbies, etc.

No. 10767

>>10765
i think anon made it to be a cosplay/con drama thread. if anything shouldn't it go in /m/?

No. 10768

>>10763

It wasn't archived, either.

No. 10769

>>10767
It had questions like "What's your dream cosplay?" or "What cons are you going to?", which isn't really drama-related, and since it involves doing stuff IRL (going to conventions), /m/ might not be the best fit either. A regional cows, seagull nostalgia/milk and/or con horror thread alone might have worked for /w/, though. It's just that other, personal blog sort of stuff was added in.
It's kind of regrettable that the gifs/images died when the thread was moved, but the move itself made sense IMO.

No. 10770

>>10767
I personally think that "con drama" sounds like an /ot/ board, simply because not all cons are anime cons.

No. 10771

>>10770
Agreed, sounds like /ot/ material to me.

No. 10772

>>10763
>>10764
>>10768
There was an unfortunate error that caused the thread to be deleted. It was (mostly) recovered, but only as a static page. Any anon who follows her threads is more than welcome to create a new updated one. The static page is https://lolcow.farm/snow/832303.html

No. 10773

Can we lock/delete the new Momokun thread and let anyone who's actually capable of doing it make a new one before everyone starts posting?

The summary of what happened 'recently' is shit that happened over a month ago and plenty of things have happened since. Plus, there have been plenty of people who actually wanted other picutres to be used in the OP and someone actually put effort into making a decent edit.

No. 10774

>>10773
Also came here to say this. It’s garbage through and through.

No. 10775

File: 1564587340910.gif (2 MB, 480x368, or.gif)

>>10762
>/w/ is a drama board and not a general bathroom talk board
It literally doesn't say that anywhere though, not in the board rules or the board info. It says "TOPICS and cows [relating to cosplay]" not "cows only" or "drama only". You're just making up rules that don't exist. What about Cosplay is bathroom talk? There's drama in cosplay that doesn't have to do with costhots, so where are we supposed to discuss it? Because it would derailing/ot to do it in the costhot thread.

>>10765
>but to laugh at and mock their participants
again
>Regional Conventions/Cows/Dramu
>Convention Horror Stories
>Seagull Nostalgia/Vintage Milk
Also the other "Drama General" threads do talk about general stuff. You can't discuss multiple cows in that community without discussing/understanding the community overall. You can't talk about Regional Drama without acknowledging regional conventions. You can't talk about Con Horror Stories, unless you talk about conventions in general. You can't talk about Vintage Milk unless you're talking about the community itself. That's why those other points are included in the op. None of these threads exists in a vacuum.
>/g/ is for conversation on fashion, stuff like friend finder generals, health/beauty, relationship stuff, personal hobbies, etc.
It doesn't meet any of those criteria. No where on /g/ does it say it's a board for personal hobbies. If cosplay met any of that criteria, then why have a whole separate board for it in the first place? /w/ says it's for "cosplay, lolita, or any group with an obsession with Japanese culture".

>>10765
>it should go in /g/
>>10767
>it should go in /m/
>>10770
>it should go in /ot/

Again….how is the simplest/most correct solution not "Put the Cosplay thread on the Cosplay board"? Why is the board called "Cosplay" if we can't talk about cosplay?

No. 10776

>>10775
i agree /w/ should be more like /cgl/ lite if anything. lets put more generals and stuff in it. the only ""general"" we have atm is a costhot thread.

No. 10777

>>10775
>>10776
I was excited when we got a Cosplay board because I thought it'd be like /cgl/ again (back when /cgl/ was fun and not dead). Even the pinned post on there makes it seem like that's what it's supposed to be? Esp if the board is called cosplay and lolita, and the pinned post basically mirrors /cgl/'s. I don't understand why cosplay would be ot there.

>>10770
>I personally think that "con drama" sounds like an /ot/ board, simply because not all cons are anime cons.
This may be the stupidest thing I've read in a long time. What other type of conventions would we be talking about on this website? Business conventions?

No. 10778

>>10777
NTA but uhm… gaming and comic book conventions do exist and people go there in cosplay …?

No. 10780

>>10778
>NTA but uhm… gaming and comic book conventions do exist and people go there in cosplay …?
Again, one of the stupidest things I've read. If people go to them in cosplay, why wouldn't they fall under the category of "Conventions & Cosplay"? The discussion was about conventions where people cosplay >>10770 op was the only one who ever even mentioned "anime". Conventions it a catch-all term.

No. 10781

>>10775
>>10776
>>10777
You must have been lost when we were discussing /w/'s existence. Look at the older /meta/ threads talking about it.
It was always meant to be a drama board. No one wants to dig through "Post your favorite cosplay" or "Dress up game general" stuff when they're trying to navigate to a thread about an actual cow or flake. That kind of thing has its place. Otherwise, /snow/ could just become /ot/ with no problem.
Personal blogging and circlejerking doesn't mix with drama. If it's this dire, just make your thread in CC, ffs.

No. 10782

>>10775
>>10776
>>10777
You must have been lost when we were discussing /w/'s existence. Look at the older /meta/ threads talking about it. And like, did you even read:
Threads not dedicated to drama can go to /ot/ for discussion.
It's right there. No one would have told you to fuck off to /w/ if you had just made the thread in /ot/ or /m/, because that's ostensibly where something like that belongs.
It was always meant to be a drama board. No one wants to dig through "Post your favorite cosplay" or "Dress up game general" stuff when they're trying to navigate to a thread about an actual cow or flake. That kind of thing has its place. Otherwise, /snow/ could just become /ot/ with no problem.
Personal blogging and circlejerking doesn't mix with drama. If it's this dire, just make your thread in CC, ffs.

No. 10783

>>10781
>>10782
>wanted to delete first post to keep the second with the quote from the sticky
>"Wrong password…"
>notice the password field is empty
RIP, sorry for spam

No. 10784

>>10332
>>10772

for anyone that was wondering, the new Lilith thread is live now.
>>>/pt/686045

No. 10785

>>10784
it should be in /snow/ not /pt/

No. 10786

>>10784
she's not a /pt/ cow, newfag

No. 10787

>>10782
i was trying to say that we should have more dramu generals on /w/ you asshat. the thread can be split between cosplay drama and fun at cons general

No. 10788

>>10782
>>10781
>>10783
>And like, did you even read
Did you read the rest of the pinned post where it says "topics" and "cosplay" or did you just look at one sentence there at the very bottom?

>Threads not dedicated to drama can go to /ot/ for discussion.

But it is about drama and it didn't go to /ot/ so this is irrelevant on all fronts.

>You must have been lost when we were discussing /w/'s existence. Look at the older /meta/ threads talking about it.

So you're saying we shouldn't follow the rules written by mods on the board rules page or the pinned post of the board itself, but the actual "secret menu" rules are the ones a bunch of anons said months ago before the board even existed? Got it, thanks for clearing that up. I guess I'll report any /w/ questions directly to you in the future and not mods.

>No one wants to dig through "Post your favorite cosplay" or "Dress up game general" stuff

I don't even know what kind of sperging you're doing here. Do you think people are going to go into a thread about a cow and go "THIS IS MY FAV COSPLAY"? "Dress up game general" has nothing to do with what we're talking about, and already has a thread in /m/ so…..another "irrelevant on all fronts" thing.

>when they're trying to navigate to a thread about an actual cow or flake.

Did you know there's a catalogue? Where you can just find the board you're looking for? Did you know you can just hide boards you don't want to see instead of throwing a full blown temper tantrum when your feelings get hurt by other people enjoying something that isn't exclusively what you enjoy? Did you know not everything's about you?

No. 10790

>>10788
>Did you read the rest of the pinned post where it says "topics" and "cosplay" or did you just look at one sentence there at the very bottom?
"Topics" and "cosplay" would relate directly to drama, not circlejerking. Reading comprehension.

>But it is about drama and it didn't go to /ot/ so this is irrelevant on all fronts.

Evidently not. It literally started with things unrelated to drama. Just make separate threads.

>So you're saying we shouldn't follow the rules written by mods on the board rules page or the pinned post of the board itself,

You clearly didn't do either of those things, otherwise you wouldn't have missed that very obvious part I highlighted, so I don't know why you're arguing from this standpoint of "I did everything right and you're just being MEAN".

>I don't even know what kind of sperging you're doing here. Do you think people are going to go into a thread about a cow and go "THIS IS MY FAV COSPLAY"? "Dress up game general" has nothing to do with what we're talking about, and already has a thread in /m/ so…..another "irrelevant on all fronts" thing.

Again, reading comprehension. It relates directly to you wanting /w/ to be full of non-drama content all because you couldn't read. "This is my fav cosplay" is literally along the lines one of the very first topics in your thread ("dream cosplay"). The second is linked to the fact that the dress up game general would typically fall under "weeb shit".

>Did you know there's a catalogue?

That's no excuse to flood a board with a very specific purpose with unrelated shit.
It's ironic that you'd accuse me of throwing a temper tantrum and add on all this stuff about "feelings" just because I explained why your thread was moved. It wasn't even deleted, and you weren't banned. It was just moved for not fitting the actual purpose of the board, which flew over your head, and now you're here yelling and complaining that you followed the rules (which you didn't), and that even if you did not, the rules should be changed for your sake when we already have like three other boards which easily would've accommodated this very same thread.

>Did you know not everything's about you?

This is the main thing you should've asked yourself before coming here to piss and moan.
The mods just weren't in the wrong here, sorry. I promise you can and will recover from this traumatic event.

No. 10791

File: 1564661231355.jpg (52.25 KB, 526x512, notthatdeep.jpg)

>>10790
ntayrt but holy shit do you need to calm down.
>That's no excuse to flood a board with a very specific purpose with unrelated shit.
>"flooding" the cosplay board with one single thread about cosplay
We're literally talking about one thread among dozens on a board…a board about cosplay. If it hurts your butt that much to have to look at one thread where people are talking about something you don't want to talk about just hide it fam just don't look at it's not that deep lmao. Never seen autism like this in my life. I'm so sorry your parents didn't prepare you for a world that doesn't revolve around you.

No. 10793

File: 1564664704036.jpg (21.57 KB, 320x320, g2g2zbguu1v13rxd_540.jpg)

>>10791
Look, you can call me "butthurt" or project as much as you want, but that won't change the very basic fact that boards have specific purposes. Threads are moved if they don't fit that. /w/ is not just a general board, and a simple look at the threads in it or at the sticky would've gleamed that. Nowhere does it say "Discuss your dream cosplays and cons you're going to attend". You misread the rules or misinterpreted it that way? That's fine. Mistakes happen. Just put the thread somewhere more fitting. It is what it is. No one was harmed by this.
It's not about me or what I want, as I'm not the admin. I'm just quoting the rules that you seem to have missed.
Deal with it. Or, keep getting mad at farmhands for doing their jobs, I guess.

No. 10795

Can y’all delete >>120606 like immediately? It’s some gross scote feeder quiz.

No. 10796

there's a scrote posting literal loli porn in the pink-pill and radfem threads, i reported it already but please be warned not to interact w/the scrote, just report and go.

No. 10797

There's an idiot baiting people in the ProJared/Holly Conrad/DCA/GG thread and they won't shut the hell up.

No. 10798

>>10788
So, all you've done is basically point out the rule page is not clear enough, which, nice catch. Anything you're sperging about beyond that point is basically why /w/ is a drama only board and not a weeb safehaven for people like you to blogpost. Everyone else in this /meta/ thread could tell where the topics you mentioned should go, it was just you who didn't get it bc you are either a newfag or were somehow not around for the /w/ board creation discussion.

No. 10799

>>10798
nta but fuck you and anyone else who does this shit. we are asking mods/admin, not salty cunts. go wash the sand out of your vag.

No. 10800

>>10799
Ok pwincess, go ahead and wait to speak to the manager.

No. 10801

>>10800
did you make the board? if you're going to admit that the rules are vague why would your input mean anything? this isn't the dumbass shit thread.

No. 10803

>>10801
NTA, but it shows that even though the rules are vague, those of us who aren't new or inattentive still understood board culture well enough to know what does and doesn't belong.
If you can't relate, that's your problem, not the site's, and complaints about that would actually go in the dumbass shit thread.

No. 10804

>>10803
it's not your decision what goes ITT. lol become a mod if you want to bitch about what you deem valid. also if you look at some of the threads on /w/ they are a fucking mess anyway. nothing worth protecting.

No. 10805

>>10804
>ITT
Newfag confirmed. No one's bitching but you.
>nothing worth protecting
Then find another site, lmao.

No. 10806

>Do not make threads on subjects under the age of 16.

I would like to post in the Celebricows thread about Foxy Brown (rapper). It's debatable whether the child she posts on instagram is even hers. Is this okay because she is a celebrity and the child isn't the subject of a thread?

No. 10807

>>10806
Yeah, that's fine.

No. 10808

File: 1564855757398.gif (189.44 KB, 220x220, tenor.gif)

>>10800
>Ok pwincess, go ahead and wait to speak to the manager.
Christ YES that's what we're trying to do but you won't shut the fuck up. That's literally what this thread is for, are you lost? Why the fuck would we listen to you? You literally don't have any authority on anything, you're just an anon shitting your pants over one singular thread. You're attempting to mini-mod the entire concept of a board with your own butthurt, over ONE thread. You're doing the equivalent of standing at the customer service desk of a Staples and screaming at customers who are trying to ask an employee if they sell staples, about how having one box of staples at a store named Staples is FLOODING THE STORE WITH STAPLES and NOT WHAT THE STORE IS ABOUT. Are you such a newfag that you not know how any of this works? Or are you just so self obsessed that you think every single interaction on this site HAS to revolve around you and your opinions?

No. 10809

File: 1564857260349.jpg (Spoiler Image, 153.1 KB, 948x1179, 1528688149705.jpg)


No. 10810

>>10808
This ties with >>10708 for my favorite tantrums in this thread.

No. 10815

Someone is spaming with prostitute photos i guess

No. 10818

Baitfag is back spamming the ProJared/Holly Conrad/DCA/GG thread.

No. 10819

>>10808
My fucking sides holy shit

No. 10821

>>10808
i regret trying to defend you.

No. 10824

File: 1564978913400.png (22.58 KB, 1152x320, plz.PNG)

this isn't my post but fucking really? this is a known bug when the site goes down. wtf?

No. 10825

>>10824
I think the new farmhands don't actually know much about lolcow based off of the things they've allowed and banned people for. I also think some of them argue with users and then look for a reason to redtext/ban them. But I could be wrong. All I know is for whatever reason it's been more annoying than usual to discuss in threads but I don't think much can be done about it until this phase of lolcow is over.

No. 10828

What‘s up with >>>/g/84480 slowly becoming an anachan circlejerk?
Is that really necessary?

No. 10829

>>10828
jesus christ it’s literally just a myproana accountability thread at this point

No. 10830

>>10828
>>10829
the anachans have been gathering all summer and I'll bet there's a solid crossover with the /snow/ thread. time to purge our hungry friends again?

No. 10831

>>10312
I just wanna say bless the fucking based Farmhand cleaning the shit show in Pheobe's thread right now. Holy shit. Where did all these retards come from? The milk right now is amazing, her insta got deleted from her nasty ass personality - but all these fucks are clogging the thread with shit. Fuck yes, thank you for banning them all. This is wild.

No. 10832

>>10831
No fucking kidding. I couldn't believe how many posts I saw encouraging cowtipping/writing to IG about not letting her have her account back. This bitch destroys herself without our help.

No. 10834

Can farmhands do something the threads in /snow/? It's either necromancy by the cow herself or starting shitty threads with no proof of milk.

No. 10835

>>10834
The best way to get attention to a thread is to report it. We'll deal with it if we need to.

No. 10836

>>10825
Amazing how many times this has to be brought up and yet it repeatedly gets glossed over with things like "you guys just don't see what the mods do".

Unfortunately with how absolutely shitty the site got under the reign of the past admin, anything current admin+mods do right now is an upgrade, including this.

No. 10840

It's not even my posts but how come in the 8chan thread in /ot/ the trad /pol/tard wasnt redtexted but farmers responding to him in sensible ways were redtexted? I understand banning for responding to bait but I legit saw someone get redtexted for "racebaiting" for saying that White Nationalists are shooting people.

No. 10842

>>10840
I think they're skittish about race being mentioned at all. I disagree with this ban as well, 8chan got shut down due to racially-motivated mass shooting so how is it derailment to talk about white supremacists? That is who the shooter was…

No. 10843

>>10840
That user was banned and had their posts deleted. If you're still seeing the posts manually refresh the thread.

No. 10846

>>10836
i disagree, new admin and new mods are definitely worse. maybe not worse then when old admin was in the process of jumping ship, but new admin hasn't changed anything for the better. when shit like >>10824 happens and no one acknowledges a fuck up and just silently deletes/unbans, that's a bad system.

No. 10847

the amount of blogging going on in the last little while is absolutely insane, but good on the mods for taking care of that shit so quickly every time

No. 10848

>>10846
I'd have to agree. New admin has been banning people left, and right for things that are just fucking retarded, while simultaneously letting other things slide.

No. 10849

>>10846
I'm overall pleased with a lot of the changes new admin has made, but it might be good to own up and apologize for fuckups instead of sweeping shit under the rug. On one hand maybe it's being done so the mods don't feel embarrassed but the way things are makes the users trust the mod team less.

No. 10851

can the Itsybitsychu/Theresa Eng thread be locked? The only time it's bumped is when a bunch of maleposters share her unspoilered nudes.

No. 10852

>>10851

Ditto. This has been going on for 22 hours.

No. 10853

>>10849
they should be embarrassed and get called out. mods do this for free so without accountability they have no incentive to fix anything. it's not like them getting "fired" means anything.

No. 10854

>>10848
>Thinking admin is the only one banning people.
How new are you?

No. 10856

What the hell is going on in the Miranda/kanadajinsan3 thread? Mods pls help.

No. 10857

>>10854
they clearly meant under the new rules. you esl or?

No. 10859

>>10856
The problem is Miranda is not the only retard in the thread now. It used to be an easy dynamic between non-retarded posters and Miranda, but now that there are two or more retards discoursing in there, it's wall to wall retardation.

Alkanadiya Hellweek, pls.

No. 10862

I've been using lolcow since the days of its inception and for the past few years have really found myself falling out of love with the site, largely due to how it's run. If there are any other long term users left out there, am I alone or does anyone else feel this way?

1. I feel like, while I think the pink pill type threads where originally meant to act as containment threads, they're in reality seeming to attract a specific type of new member. The frequent use of words like 'scrot' or 'handmaiden', and derailing into radfem discourse just feels excessive and annoying. I'm not saying the points being made aren't important topics or good points, i'm not trying to make a comment on the actual content of them at all, but it's similar to race-related derailing. While the topic may be important, it's no less annoying. Around 2015/2016, threads would frequently dissolve into debates about race relations until a ban was put on unrelated race related discussion - I feel like a similar thing should be done to topics regarding radical feminism, and I think there should be a discussion of how many people actually want the pink pill type threads on the board. I feel like it may work better to just have one of this type of thread, we currently have: pink pill thread (number 26), gender critical, radical feminism, friending a troon, which all really heavily overlap. I feel like having loads of boards about pretty much the same topic isn't serving the site well.

2. I also feel like the splitting of boards is quite counterintuitive and confusing. There is no real distinction between threads that belong on /ot/ and /g/, and /m/was a board that overwhelmingly people did not want, which overlaps a lot with /ot/. I feel like spreading it out so much slows down the site traffic and it would make more sense to shrink the number of boards and limit repetitive threads.
I think having /w/ be a separate board is a really strange and unnecessary decision considering the nature of the site. Weebs and cows/snowflakes are obviously not mutually exclusive so I don't understand why they are a distinct category. The point of the site was weeb type cows so if anything it should be other variations of cows that have a separate board. I feel like /snow/ and /pt/ being now mostly full of just youtubers really changed the audience and feel of the site.
This is small but I also think it's strange that [ot/g/m] appears first, in front of [pt/snow/w] when the latter is supposed to be the main topic of the site, I think it would make more sense to have it the other way round but idk if it will actually make a difference to anything

3. I also feel like there is a huge problem with over moderation, and that moderation seems to be quite inconsistent. Things like 'hi cow' or 'underated post', while i get contribute nothing and are annoying, really don't happen that frequently and were not banned in the early years of lolcow - do people really feel like this rule has improved the quality of this site? I find the red text and banning over these small mistakes more annoying than the actual posts themselves and only deter new users and traffic from the site. However, things like blogposting for example is actually much more derailing and is currently out of control across the board and for some reason doesn't appear to be being dealt with by mods?
I also don't enjoy the concept of banned threads. For example the Anisa thread (and a few years back the Berry thread), are not threads I had any interest in, but I feel objectively were no different in ~quality~ than the majority of threads in this board. I feel like there was never really a real reason given for them being banned, and that the small (if any) benefit in banning them is hugely outweighed by the negative precedent that even having banned threads (on cows) sets. It just goes against the entire ethos of the 'anything goes' nature that the site originally had.

There's more things, but this is already so long…. but does anyone else feel like this?

No. 10863

>>10862
I've been saying this for a while, but users who have only been here for the past 2 years whine about "newfags". I hate all the radfem/pinkpill shit now because while those users are generally fine, the newfag users that come for those threads are awful little shitbags that never shut the fuck up. you can definitely tell who is who, and it's those users that make the pinkpill threads so lame with their sperging. I also agree about the weebshit whining.I feel that too many users on the site are quick to brush off it's roots as if anything they don't like should suddenly stop existing.

All in all I think the major shift is the new userbase, but I guess that's just how the site is going. Sometimes I go on /cgl/ but it's a fucking hugbox hellhole by now and there is nothing to do. I've really seen a big shift in just the past year or 2 that's actually noticeable and it's just people who haven't been here that long that don't notice it.

It almost makes me miss Regina and that era

No. 10864

>>10863
>the newfag users that come for those threads are awful little shitbags that never shut the fuck up. you can definitely tell who is who, and it's those users that make the pinkpill threads so lame with their sperging.

the twitter/tumblr/instagram overlap has absolutely wrecked this. cant make a joke without fear of someone getting pissed for whatever woke reason. i get trying to keep the peace to a point that it remains functional but id rather just cut the infection out altogether.

oh god big fat regina lmao

No. 10865

>>10863
>>10864
>>10862
We are aware of this issue and working on a way to eliminate radfem overflow.

No. 10866

>>10862
anon I'm 100% with you on point 1. their debates and terms now infest many threads. we purged anachans then munchies for bleeding throughout the site the same way.

No. 10867

>>10865 I hope that’s true, but honestly I doubt that - the behaviour of the mods and admins is the exact opposite of that, they’re clearly sympathetic to that population of the board. I’ve seen mods themselves use terms like ‘scrot’ themselves In red text very recently

No. 10868

>>10867
in all fairness, men were never allowed on this site, and calling someone a scrot isn't a radfem thing.

No. 10869

>>10868
Men were always kind of discouraged as an unspoken thing, but actually banning men came about from the r9k raid. Scrot was never used here until pretty recently and originated (on this site) from the rad fem related boards

No. 10870

>>10869
people were actually talking about how dumb and annoying the word scrot was a couple months back and then it became commonplace suddenly

No. 10871

>>10862
It's not just the radfem spergs ruining the site, we've also gotten a flood of libfems but both groups are olympic class professionals at shitting up the discussion to talk about their hurt feelings. I didn't use to mind radfem stuff appearing in /ot/, but it's literally taken over every thread and the posters keep getting more comfortable being aggressive. It's not just that they hate men, I sure as hell do too, but they tend to be unnecessarily hostile towards other women for whatever bullshit reason their woke brains can come up with. The moralfagging is out of control and it's impossible to keep up a conversation about anything even slightly controversial because they will immediately jump at any chance to attack other anons over nothing. The anime hate is especially strange seeing how most of the original userbase migrated from cgl and now we got people having a panic attack over anything even slightly weebish.

No. 10872

What's with the old dude picture spam? Lol

No. 10873

File: 1565365707504.png (181.79 KB, 900x573, braco[3].png)

Stop it, Janny.

No. 10874

>>10871
Agree with the moralfagging. The points made are sound but there are anons who derail everything into an anti-porn discussion, even on /g/ and /m/. In the anime critical thread for example there were anons talking about porn for some reason. We already have the kinkshaming thread and while I don't disagree with the actual content of the post, it would be better for the board if all anti-porn discourse was contained within that thread.

No. 10876

>>10857
>New admin has been banning people left, and right for things that are just fucking retarded, while simultaneously letting other things slide

>they clearly meant under the new rules. you esl or?


learn how to read before calling other anons esl

No. 10877

>>10871
This so much.
I‘m at a point that I don’t even want to spend time on /ot/ anymore because it‘s gotten such a ‘if you don’t want to kill every man you’ve ever talked to you cater to the patriarchy and are part of the problem’-mentality that it makes me feel guilty for having a boyfriend or even interacting with men in a non-hostile way.
I’m all for radical feminism and hating men and the patriarchy but damn, there are other things in life.

And /g/ is slowly starting to go into the same direction.

No. 10878


No. 10879

>>10876
NTA but I doubt anon meant admin herself is banning people. Now stop with the OT nitpicking.

>>10868
Found the newfag.

>>10871
I agree with all this. I am just so shocked at how much the site changed in a short time.

I also wish that since we have /snow/ and /w/ that someone fucking moves the threads. We have holly in /snow/ but she claims to draw anime, and that star wars cosplayer should be in /snow/ because cosplay isn't automatically weebshit. I am also extremely weirded out by the general hostility towards other women on the board, which is lightly masked by claims of feminism. Calling someone a "handmaiden" or "pick me" doesn't seem very feminist. I have seen those terms used to try and kill discussion too, or when anons respond with "imagine defending men" to any comment that's not talking about any man negatively.

Also anons who use terms like "scrote" or "handmaiden" automatically sound like unintelligent men whining about "cunts" and "normies", just saying.

No. 10880

>>10879
NTA but tell me a time when men were welcome here?

No. 10881

>>10880
We used to have robot containment threads and some /cgl/ tripfags used the site at one point (on anon here but they always talked about it on /cgl/) Men first started getting temp banned for posting about wanting to fuck cows, it was really bad in cosplay cow threads. Like anon said, we didn't actually make it a rule until after Spoony kept initiating /r9k/ raids. This was all right after staminarose went down and before the Shoe cuck mod.

No. 10882

File: 1565406512968.png (460.22 KB, 1845x765, retarded.png)

Why?? This thread is a garbage fire most of the time without the mods banning people for having basic conversations. And that's what this was, blogposting is allowed on /ot/. Admin get your weeb ass out of akiba for 5 minutes and hire some mods who aren't 5 years old.

No. 10883

File: 1565406791073.jpeg (29 KB, 640x480, images (20).jpeg)

lolcow admin candid

No. 10884

>>10882
was that your ban? that was a really stupid bait generalization.

No. 10885

>>10882
That person is an obsessively dedicated sperg on /ot/ lol, they get banned like every day

No. 10886

>>10880
Nothing against you or new comers in general, but this is kind of what I’m talking about as I feel like a lot of new users have this impression. The way the mods have let the radfem overflow bleed through the entire site and allowed many threads of essentially the exact same topic, plus the fact that we banned men - we were no longer a site that just has a mostly female user base but became like The Radfem Image Board That Banned Men, and I think that has led us to attract an extremely niche kind of new visitor and why lolcow is the way it is now. Honestly the radfem thing is only a small part of it to me though, I felt lolcow was changing a lot ages ago even before tempcow, I think when the onision threads were a big deal here too that attracted another undesirable large group of users (pre teen ex onision fans) which also permanently changed the feel of lolcow. I don’t know if the turn away from the weeby cow types lolcow focused on originally is more to do with the moderation or just the way the site is going naturally but I really miss the 2014 and beginning of of 2015 golden era. I feel like the site really had something good going for it and I wish the admins had done more to preserve it but we’ve had terrible admin after terrible admin unfortunately who have all been very heavy handed in changing things (despite many claiming they would stick to the ethos of the site), not listened to users, and ended up totally alienating their core user base and attracting niche undesirable groups

No. 10887

>>10886
The Onision threads were really a turn for the worst. I also miss the golden era and I miss being able to be more nitpicky.

>>10884
It wasn't my ban but I just cringed at the weird ban reason.

No. 10888

>>10887
Same! Banning ‘nitpicking’ was so stupid because of A) how subjective it is B) it kills discussion and slows down the traffic, the site was a lot faster in the early days because of the petty nitpicking and discussion resulting from that, I miss it it was funny and light hearted C) that’s literally all the site is, if you want to ban nitpicking then you may as well just close down lolcow

No. 10889

>>10888
not the oldest user here but i get the sentiment. ive been on lolcow for 5 years, there is a difference no doubt. but at some point its tiring to entertain bullshit posts. nitpicking isnt furthering conversation. its beating a dead horse and fucking annoying. people come in thinking that they have new insight as to why cow is a narc because of insert whatever bloggy reason they think is new and never been stated before. why is it so important that a thread has a new post every two minutes? i would rather something die down until there is new and interesting stuff that comes up.

it absolutely can be lighthearted but idiots are shitting up the place because they feel their personal insight will change the way people view someone and will cowtip til the sun comes up just for a screenshot. seeing someone bitch about being silenced because they believe that their personal experience that coincides with a cow makes them special and exempt from blogging is laughable. trash attracts trash

No. 10890

>>10889
I agree with you, I think we may have different definitions of nitpicking. I think anything that incorporates blog posting or cow tipping is detrimental to discussion (and has always been against the rules) which seems to be more what your talking about, but the more petty and less hug boxy discussions that there used to be is what I miss

No. 10891

>>10882
It's a bad ban imo as well. Blogging isn't an issue on /ot/…

>>10890
I'd agree to an extent but then there's mentally ill anons who wanna zoom in on Onion's pores for no reason (we all know he has bad skin) or try to measure his dick size through sweatpants. Ultimately it might be better to have a slower thread than have posts like that populating the discussion.

No. 10893

>>10888
No. I'd rather have a slow site than a site full of speds who scream about Momokun's "boob vein". It attracts an audience of people who don't have patience for more material and end up getting obsessed with the cow, becoming cows themselves. Most normal people don't want to scroll through 50 "Oh my god she's such a fat fuck look at her drinking that coke in the IG story LMAO" replies, the threads shouldn't be your fucking diary for unfiltered thoughts. I don't know why anyone would WANT nitpicking to be allowed because it's so stupid, like do you really want to see replies whining about someone's ribcage shape or whatever skinwalking autism has been going on in the Dakota thread for the past 5 years? It's not "funny and lighthearted", it's cringeworthy and annoying.

>>10889
This.

The people complaining about their bans most likely deserve it, I've been posting here for 5 years and I've never been banned.

No. 10894

>>10882
That anon was probably necessaryspeed4 and thats why they got banned. shes been ban evading for months.

No. 10895

I got a ban (expired) for something I didnt write and it's no where near my IP location. About furries which is not a thing I care or even talk about lol.

I don't care about the ban as it was expired l, but maybe it happened to others or is a glitch.

No. 10896

>>10894
Then just quietly delete the post without calling it out. People either wouldn't notice or just think it was a troll. But when it gets redtexted with something that calls out blogposting it just looks stupid.

No. 10897

>>10879
>Calling someone a "handmaiden" or "pick me" doesn't seem very feminist
No offense but imageboard and being PC isn’t the top priority. The use of “retard” and “autism” is cultural ffs, which isn’t woke by any mean. Calling a pick me a pick me is just true lol If women can’t be criticized for being retarded then is it really feminist?

No. 10898

>>10895
if you're using a vpn or on mobile it's just IP cycling

No. 10899

>>10897
You totally ignored my point good job. It was a criticism of how users shit on each other constantly with gender based insults (especially on /ot/), yet many users claim to be feminist.

No. 10901

>>10899
Nta but who tf cares? This isn't a feminist board, it never has been and it never will be. We can insult eachother how we want. Those might not even be the same users.

No. 10902

>>10901
If you're not even going to read my OP then I don't know what to tell you. Bawwing about pick mes and handmaidens makes you sound like a fucking female neckbeard. And women who aren't raging radfems don't use those terms.

No. 10903

>>10902
I did read your op, jackass. Again, who cares? Complaints like that aren't what this thread is for unless you were hoping to get those terms banned from the site.

No. 10904

>>10903
>unless
p sure that was her purpose with the complaint?

No. 10905

>>10903
> or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.

They are. Also this >>10904. You sure seem like you got your feefees hurt, sorry for being a big mean bully.

No. 10906

>>10905
So you want admin to start banning certain insults on an image board where women regularly rip other women apart,, because they're not feminist enough?

>You sure seem like you got your feefees hurt

So do you, you sound like you got your feefees hurt so bad after being called a gender based insult/"scrote" that you ran to meta to try and get those words banned sitewide lmfao. Humiliating.

No. 10907

File: 1565491062725.png (65.4 KB, 1700x704, heather sparkles 8-10-2019.png)

the Heather Sparkles thread is at it again. this thread seems to get flooded with selfposters almost daily.

No. 10909

>>10906
please take your fucking meds. you freaks cannot go 5 minutes without screeching about "banning" words to actually realize anon was just insulting the people who post that kind of thing. it's not really that deep.

No. 10910

>>10909
your samefagging is obvious kek and you literally just confirmed that the whole point of bringing it up here was because you wanted to get those insults banned, you weren't just insulting the people who use them. stop projecting your own mental illness onto me.

No. 10911

>>10890
I just think that time can't come back since the type of new users that have come in that have no chill at all, and the number of them. Also the cows are posting us to social media pretty often now and attracting throngs of newfags.

Anyway to join in with the other here, I can't stress enough how important it is to purge anyone unironically using the terms scrot, handmaiden, or pick me.

No. 10912

>>10911
>purge anyone unironically using the terms scrot

Come on it's a good term for a useless man. Are we all gonna be nice polite little ladies and never use bad words about men even on an imageboard like this? Even as useless scrotes show up and spam nazi child porn like a recent one did?

No. 10913

>>10911
retarded opinion right there. I'm by no means a raging radfem and never post in the pinkpill thread but those terms are often usefull (even tho handmaiden and scrot are cringey). There's always CC for you.

No. 10914

>>10913
>>10912
This. I want the radfems gone too but banning terms you don't like is just autistic. They aren't radfem exclusive.

No. 10915

File: 1565538032563.png (89.17 KB, 281x199, 1548574893632.png)

>>10911
>I can't stress enough how important it is to purge anyone unironically using the terms scrot, handmaiden, or pick me.

No. 10916

Why not red text ala victim and triggered? I agree it's cringe to see these words thrown around like a 12 year old discovering the word fag but banning them is just as stupid

No. 10917

>>10916
They’re not banned though. You can still urs the words, they’re automatically filtered to stand out more.

No. 10918

>>10916
Agree with adding them to the red text list. I don't want the terms banned but they are often used as buzzwords to dismiss another anon's opinion.

No. 10919

So, why was autosage removed from the Venus Angelic thread? It’s still full of cringey infighting and nitpicking. And basically no one knows how to use sage.

No. 10922

>>10917
nta but, yeah… that's the point.

No. 10923

>>10918
If your opinion wasn’t whack as shit then it wouldn’t have been dismissed by some buzzwords kek

No. 10924

>>10923
I've never personally been accused of being a scrote but seeing the amount of derailing that follows when anon goes "no, I'm totally a woman!!" Is pretty repetitive. It's like I'm reading the exact same post over and over about how anon with her dumbass fetishes and stupid politics cant possibly be a woman.

No. 10926

>>10879
>Calling someone a "handmaiden" or "pick me" doesn't seem very feminist.
Criticizing behaviors with a label isn't oppressive or anti-feminist.
I'm not a "raging feminist" but even I can identify shitty men and the desperate women who pander to them. Like this anon said >>10912 why do female-dominated sites always have to be tone policed like this? We're not on here because we're polite delicate ladies who care about not offending anyone, we're here for dirty tea.

No. 10927

>>10898
>if you're using a vpn or on mobile it's just IP cycling
That must've been it. Thank you for your help.

No. 10928

>>10927
No problem. It’s happened to me too but I’ll notice the date of the ban was like 2 years ago.

No. 10929

>>10916
I like the red text idea, its a good compromise.

No. 10931

>>10915
can't even make a joke about these words without all the seriousposters coming out. good going anons.

>>10929
redtext is the obvious solution.

No. 10932

I’d be for banning the words scrote and handmaiden or at least red texting them. They aren’t ‘helpful words’ or just ‘words we dislike’, they are very niche words that come solely from a small specific group that were never used on the site for five years and then suddenly are used in every post. It’s pretty common for image boards to enforce rules against people who don’t assimilate or significantly change the culture of the board, that’s the only way to preserve its original intended use and not alien its core user base. The fact that people are interpreting this as ‘policing women’ is itself exactly the problem, we were a predominantly female user base years before you freaks even started coming here. We aren’t trying to preform some radical feminist act of resistance by not being ‘nice little ladies’ posting here as you seem to think for some reason, we just want to gossip about cows. We don’t want the words to be banned because of anything about men or feminism, we want the culture of a imageboard that has existed for years prior to remain, and there aren’t any left like it. This isn’t a radfem image board and it’s unfair for you all to just invade here and try and totally shift it to one. Make your own imageboard or something, clearly most people here, especially long time users, are unhappy and don’t want you here.

No. 10933

Can the mods seriously make up their minds in the momokun thread already?
There are always picked out one or two posts that supposedly are nitpicking and ‘against the rules’ after the latest 20 or so posts discussed the exact same thing. Basically the entirety of her threads are ‘nitpicking’ lately as there is no real milk.
Also, how is one post discussing her weight (again, just like almost any other post) any more derailing than starting a discussion about why it’s posted?

If you don’t want people to nitpick (and apparently any sort of discussion about her appearance is nitpicking?), then ban all people doing it or lock the entire threads because as I said there’s basically nothing else happening.

I could report all of the posts but I’m pretty sure you’d consider that spamming, soo…

No. 10934

>>10933
What's considered nitpicking is so arbitrary and subjective, it's retarded to ban nitpicking on a gossip site anyway ffs.

No. 10935

A poster from the Russian version of /pol/ (on Endchan) made a thread in /ot/, invited all his buddies and now they're bumping it with unsaged spam and other BS.
>>>/ot/447235

No. 10936

>>10934
Nitpicking should probably just be banned if it's not saged. People that want to exclusively read milk can filter it out.

No. 10938

>>10932
>we just want to gossip about cows

Why not just ask to have ot / g / m removed, problem solved.

No. 10939

>>10938
I have done. I think they should go back to the old format of pt/snow/b and maybe bring manure back for radfem topics if they won’t ban them (they won’t)

No. 10941

>>10932

>calls for banning "handmaiden" and "scrote"

>refers to GC and radfem anons as "you freaks"

Were "handmaiden" and "scrote" used anywhere prior to five years ago?

>>10939

Back in the day did you have to walk uphill in the snow both ways to post?

The internet and its culture are, by design, ever rapidly changing and evolving. Witness the internet nostalgia thread. People have been decrying changes in internet culture since the advent of trolls and the invasion of AOHell normies on Usenet in the late 90s.

No. 10942

>>10941
You trying to frame an influx of niche users that totally changed the culture of the board as some ‘inevitable internet change’ is really disingenuous. This is not really any different to when we had influxes from ana-chans, munchies, r9k raids etc etc that ended up bleeding through the entire site and were dealt with to avoid ruining everyone else’s experience, as no one apart from them wanted them there. The difference with the radfem situation is that mods haven’t dealt with it and have ignored the problem. I’m asking for moderation of the site not for the site to never progress or change - but changes should be for the better and agreed upon my the majority of users

No. 10943

>>10942
>thinking lolcow is a democracy
the newfaggotry is astounding

No. 10944

>>10943
>Not a democracy
>Abloobloo newfagz
Nta but farmers are voting during Town-hall.

No. 10945

>>10939
Why would it go in /manure/? I don't see any reason why it wouldn't belong in /ot/ (or /b/ in this case), as it's general discussion. I'm a long-time user, and I genuinely don't see the problem. Just hide the thread if it triggers you so much. Personally, I hate the dog hate thread, so I hid the shit and have since moved on.
I feel like the complaints about being called a scrote or handmaiden are pretty overblown, too. Can anyone even link to (or describe with full context) instances where it was actually unfairly used? From what I've seen and experienced, you have to be on some level of bullshit to be accused of being a man or handmaiden.

No. 10946

>>10945
I was called a scrot once because someone misunderstood or disagreed with my post. I'm in no way bitter about this, we are anon after all and men do indeed lurk and post. The anon wanting to ban those words sounds butthurt.

No. 10947

>>10942
Anachan and scrote posting still happens, everyone ignores them just fine so maybe try the same and or try reddit. Ban on things like racebaiting nitpicking is because it clogs up threads by being repetitive while never going anywhere, not cuz they hurt feelings and “ruin experience”.
Like this place was made by a bunch of weebs and now it has substantial anti anime sentiment, you don’t see the weebs crying about it as hard as you cry about evil radfems. It’s almost as if we’re not a hive mind. Im not on anonymous imageboard to be nonoffensive apolitical and tone policed tf

No. 10948

>>10947
Why do people keep trying to portray it as if the reason people complain about it is because it’s ‘political’ and ‘offensive’? No one has ever said that it’s just cringeworthy and derailing. I don’t see how it’s any different to race baiting, going on random tangents about radical feminism or calling other users ‘scrot’ or ‘handmaiden’ and then them arguing back and forth about how their ‘actually a woman!!’ or about feminism is just as repetitive and derailing as race baiting. ‘Anti weeb sentiment’ hasn’t bled through the entire board with derailing and repetitive buzzwords?

No. 10949

>>10947
You seem to be new to imageboards, maybe try /b/ on 4chan if you think they're "anything goes" lol. We still have rules bb. Anachans and robots got banned because they're fucking annoying and ruin threads, radfem shit is the new version of that. I always find it funny when 2 or 3 people are complaining about something and then one anon comes in to say that literally no one complains about it and it doesn't happen. It's always the opposite.

No. 10950

>>10926
>why do female-dominated sites always have to be tone policed like this?
stop using shitty buzzwords as insults and maybe they wouldn't? also if you think that male dominated sites don't do this you're fucking retarded. why do all the people who defend annoying crap seem to think that this only happens it's some kind of censorship on women? it wouldn't matter if you were a man or woman the action is the problem, no matter who's doing it.

No. 10951

>>10933
Nitpicking anons have always been banned and not all bans are redtexted. Farmhands have made a statement before about nitpicking Mooriah’s weight ages ago. You shouldn’t be surprised it’s a bannable offensive.

No. 10952

>>10951
I know that. I think it would be a hell of a lot more noticeable if 50%< of the people posting were banned, even if not every ban is redtexted.
I myself didn’t post anything different than other anons and wasn’t banned either.

They’re being incredibly inconsistent and that’s what’s pissing me off. Either ban everyone equally or don’t at all. Picking a few ones and acting like they’re fixing the problem won’t help. Especially with what >>10934 said it makes it impossible to tell what is and isn’t considered nitpicking.

No. 10953

Fucking morons on TND thread going off about bathtubs.
Please help!

No. 10954

>>10950
Idk if it was you but whoever raised the point that it's attracting a certain type of user is correct. Even Admin admitted they're aware of the radfem sperg invasion upthread. Redtext (->abusive) and diligent banning for derailment should sort it out imo but this tiki torch tier FREEDOM OF SPEECH argument about chan culture ain't it.

Thing is, not only do the stupid insults attract spergs, but they also cause derailment bc now you have several anons arguing about whether someone is a scrote or handmaiden when none of that relates to the thread topic. Just on that basis, punishing the buzzwords in some way makes sense.

No. 10955

Diet/Fitness/Health Accountability Thread is becoming a pro ana cesspool.

No. 10956

>>10954
exactly this. also notice the "muh free speech" anons go quiet about shit they don't like such as nitpicking or anachan posting. shouldn't everyone have free speech?

No. 10957

i think the lola tyrell thread in snow should be locked. it’s completely inactive except for people who necro it just to announce that they’ve cowtipped her, apparently her account’s been private for quite some time and it doesn’t look like any future milk is incoming especially since the entirety of the existence of her threads comes from a singular incident AFAIK. when the threads were active it was incredibly obvious that the same handful of local weirdos were running the entire show and i wouldn’t be surprised if it’s the same person bumping the thread every few weeks just to announce that they tried to follow her again.

No. 10959

>>10954
>>10956
I agree with both of you. I think that the FREE SPEECH DONUT SENSOR ME! anons are just the spergs who want to derail and try to shut out conversation, which means it's only free speech for them.

Another thing I've noticed is that more and more anons are getting called men for being a little harsh or not going with the status quo opinion. Not necessarily myself, but often I'll see anons being called scrotes for calling others out for being stupid. it's not a good look.

No. 10960

>>10959
I've noticed a lot of derailment and unnecessarily harsh edgelord comments too. I remember Lolcow when it was fairly new and it wasn't perfect cause the race bait was annoying but slowly the admins got rid of the race rage monsters and it was pretty good for five minutes. Then back to back to back each phase has been a bit of a mess with bouts of it being decent for a bit. I rarely post or will have phases where I post a little often so I don't really interact with anyone on here much cause I mostly like to read on the bus or something but the recent radfem users and even radfem farmhands make me not even want to bother. I remember the last admin had decided to limit / ban radfem threads and derailment but it's gone completely backwards since this new one came. I remember it got so bad in the last phase that people were saying men couldn't be raped / deserved to be and that little boys should be broken by women before they turn into men and if the crazy derailment and ree'ing doesn't stop anytime soon we'll be right back to that. It's not about radfem not being welcome (even tho I personally am not a fan) but instead that it derails and takes over threads and entire boards and no one can have a conversation or provide information without being called a handmaiden which like the other anon said isn't very feminist especially since the history behind handmaidens/ bedwenches consist of women and little girls being raped by men in power so the narrative doesn't even make any sense regardless of how they're trying to reinvent it. And the only reason why I and other anons call out it not being adherent to feminism is because the keep preaching at everyone about how they are a real feminist.

Tdlr: I agree with everybody else.

No. 10961

>>10960
I agree. /ot/ especially has gotten this a lot, but I think that with JYs thread on /pt/ it can only go downhill more. A lot of that thread is more about "REEE TRANNIES" than posting about him. Those posts also cause people to argue about real vs. fake trans, which wouldn't have happened if the thread stayed on topic. A number of posts in the thread would be considered medfagging in other threads. I know it's a meme, but I really think a lot of our userbase is from tumblr now or the same kind of userbase, which explains a lot. I just feel that most of the users I interact with or see are really young, both literally and mentally. And many of them seem apt to try to assert their malformed opinions and then chimp out when people don't agree with/praise them. It's really annoying. Also robotposting is really fucking obvious so it really grinds my gears when people are quick to call someone they disagree with a man, but then actually talk to the robot bait for 10+ posts without realizing

No. 10962

Can we do something against the reviewbrah spergs in the ‘men you’re ashamed to say you’d fuck’ thread? It’s fine if someone agrees with another post but they’re shitting up the thread swooning over him and we’ve been there already in the last thread and they’ve also infested on of the fetish threads in the past.

No. 10963

Jamie Leigh Fischer thread in /snow/ should be on auto-sage. Keeps getting stealth bumped and has major contributions from the cow herself seeking attention and notoriety.

No. 10964

>>10962
I like to think the reviewbrah anons are all just men bc I refuse to believe he has that many female orbiters.

No. 10965

File: 1565883740671.gif (2.88 MB, 500x281, whyc.gif)

>>10964
>Anons complaining in this thread about other anons calling each other men for random ass posts and derailing
>Come into /meta/ and call anons men for random shit like liking the food review guy

Bold.

No. 10966

>>10933
>>10934
Addendum: How is the nitpicking in the moo thread any different from the nitpicking in the TND or in the Luna Slater thread?
They constantly make fun of how they look/dress, yet somehow it’s more substantial than when someone does it about moo because she’s fat?

Idgi.
Again: Make up your minds and either allow nitpicking or ban it consequently. I’ll gladly report all of them, if that’s what you want.

No. 10967

The constant posting of Maria's zoo in the pettuber thread in /snow/ needs to be tamed. It reeks of self posting and since she's already proven she reads the forum and enjoys the attention, I think it's worthless to continue feeding into it with pointless updates about her smoking weed or whatever.

No. 10968

>>10967
it’s obviously the same fag considering literally every tweet posted has 0 retweets and maybe 1 like if she’s lucky. i think you’re right, it’s selfposting especially since the person also happens to always be logged out.

No. 10969

>>10950
Why don't you take a break from posting instead of getting so upset by every little insult or label that's thrown rightfully your way?
You're only campaigning against those particular words because you're offended.

No. 10971

So we gonna lock the Lola Tyrell thread or?

No. 10972

Whats with the select banning in the unpopular opinions thread for racebaiting? You’ll have one anon go on about how much european countries are shit, fuck this certain race and then when an anon replies with the same comment in reverse, its racebaiting and they get slapped with a ban. Why not ban the original comment for literally baiting the next 10 comments made about race??

No. 10973

>>10971
Yes, please put the Lola Tyrell thread out of its misery.

No. 10974

>>10972
how many times do people need to come in here and tell you retards that not every ban gets redtexted and that whoever you're talking about most likely got banned as well.

No. 10975


No. 10977

>>10973
Came here to say this.

No. 10978

>>10971
>>10973
Ya know what! Don’t lock it. Just autosage it so the cow can go mad fruitlessly talking to herself. Maybe she’ll accuse her bf of uhbuse again lol

No. 10979

>>10978
are you autistic? first of all, you’re doing a shit job of blending in. second of all, it’s pretty obviously some new faggot consistently bumping her thread, not lola herself. wouldn’t be surprised if you’re the autist who bumps it.

No. 10980

>>10978
you're a prime example of why locking the lola tyrell thread is a good idea



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]