File: 1751618156760.jpg (26.83 KB, 474x291, this is fine.jpg)
No. 95534
Come here to complain or to suggest things.
Previous Thread:
>>>/meta/94117Please not that there is a high chance that your complaints will not be addressed nor will your suggestions be heeded. No. 95535
>>95485Time to remake all threads on Kiwi Farms lel.
>>95490>LC unironically feels like a moralfag site now.No person below the age of 30 should be a mod/janny here or on any other image board.
No. 95536
File: 1751621442243.jpg (24.46 KB, 1253x98, 2X.jpg)
Autism.
No. 95549
File: 1751661915828.png (208.7 KB, 973x724, jfc.png)
When racebait about Jewish people, Romani people, and Turkish people is allowed for the entire week, then we get huge race related rants like picrel. Please can you address racebait quicker in the future so we don't have to deal with racist spergouts.
No. 95552
File: 1751667433894.jpeg (66.52 KB, 1910x204, IMG_0875.jpeg)
Is this thing not a scrote? Im not sure if it was ever reported but another post below it was banned so idk.
>femtard
No. 95554
File: 1751667826872.gif (1.7 MB, 370x272, source.gif)
>>95549What thread is this? If it's UPO then nothing will be done
No. 95560
>>95557>>95558This is so funny. Why are you so angry about multiple anons pointing out hypocrisy from mods in the complaints thread?
I'm (not) sorry you have beef with the dastmalchian posters, at this point you're making yourself sound like one dedicated sperg projecting because you can't handle the thought that multiple anons think the ban was retarded and you're a tantruming vendettafag.
No. 95561
>>95558Anon, you are… not responding to a post from me, the one who was banned. As I stated before, not everyone who irritates or disagrees with you is me, kek. I don't know what you want at this point since I stopped posting him once I got the ban and other anons don't seem to be posting him either, since he seems like an unspoken banned topic now. I'll check those threads out, though, thanks for the rec.
>>95560Yeah, I don't know why she's calling everyone a sperg and schizo when she thinks everyone is the same person. I think this is the third time now that she's responded to someone different than me saying it's me. IIRC jannies can literally check my post history and see that while I've posted asking about it ITT, I'm not the same anon.
No. 95562
File: 1751695155782.png (1018.7 KB, 2000x1456, 1000156558725.png)
I think the point people were making when bringing up other posters from the unconventional thread was to try and understand what the difference between all those posts were compared to the banned one since nearly everyone personalityfags there. I hope nobody thinks I want them banned, I love them all. I'm not a dalmatian anon but a different anon who has posted other men multiple times before and wants to know what is or isn't allowed, what makes some paragraph posts acceptable but others not, what makes some daily posts acceptable or not, etc. I don't know if I'm wording things right.
Idk why there's so much hostility and aggression over this topic when mods can just answer. Why won't they elaborate and put an end to this once and for all?
No. 95565
>>95562I don't know why there's so much aggression from both sides
as the banned anon considering this is literally a cow site. We're all retarded here. I'm thinking that, outside of jannies not checking here much and mainly just indirectly responding to posts (like when we report CP spams in the thread), it would be difficult to justify the ban without it causing a lot more discourse and questions.
Regardless; I've said it twice now, but I'm not going to post him anymore and haven't since the ban. I wouldn't even if the redtext was miraculously removed, because it's just not worth the trouble.
>>95563I second/third this! I wish I had a less shitty computer so I could play more of the games posted over there.
No. 95590
>>95589ntayrt and not trying to make myself look bad when i admit this but i laugh at gross shit that comes up on my feed every single day kek does that mean i would ever post 4 memes in a row of the most graphic possible memes that my eyes come cross as soon as i wake up in the morning? hell no LOL, we should be able to post about stupid or obscene shit in that thread but if you’re going to then anons should learn2spoiler and also
maybe not post like 5 of them in a row? just a suggestion though
No. 95602
File: 1751900015815.jpeg (310.85 KB, 807x615, IMG_9335.jpeg)
so pedoshit and zoophilia is just fine if it's ~ironic~ huh? sorry but this farmhand is a fucking retard
No. 95603
>>95596Different opinions is not the same as defending a cow, thin-skinned
nonnie.
No. 95604
File: 1751903322164.gif (1.99 MB, 628x640, meditation.gif)
>>95602Nothing illegal has been posted. I think you'd faint if you saw the earlier lolcow threads. You should just hide the thread as advised by the farmhand, for your own peace of mind.
I admit to being one of the posters in that thread, but the random scrotefoiling and the urge to ban anything that offends you is silly. In fact, read rule 6 for /ot/ - Don’t report a post simply because you disagree with it, not everyone who disagrees is a man.
No. 95608
>>95604>>95605there's a difference between being offended at everything and not liking seeing a thread become a dumping ground for rape jokes and zoophile memes
i din't give a shit about edgy humour in general because not everyone who disagrees with you is an offended twitterfag. i'm just one of of the multiple anons who thinks letting people post pedo/zoo memes is retarded and pretty much an open invitation to shit up the board
No. 95609
>>95608Can someone link these posts? I don't want to go find them. Also, I swear if this is like the loli/sho retards who then started flagging
anything that was a
kid coded in 2D form.
No. 95610
>>95609must be these ones
>>>/ot/2592720>>>/ot/2592749>>>/ot/2592788>>>/ot/2592895>>>/ot/2593553 (ngl I think this one is most likely a moid I wonder if the post history thing the farmhand mentioned applies to this anon too)
No. 95615
>>95612yeah because "crying wont unrape you" is a conpletely normal post
then again what do i expect from lolishit defenders
>>95613yeah exactly. if jannies allow posting shit like rape jokes and pedo memes, it's going to attract bait posters and scrotes
No. 95623
File: 1751917269188.png (13.09 KB, 507x139, Screenshot.png)
People should stop responding to racebait.
No. 95625
File: 1751918906831.png (741.23 KB, 1687x867, wrong.png)
Who's the newfag janny in /snow/? The redtexts are different from usual and spoonfeeding is asking for information that was already covered in previous threads, not this. This janny clearly has never read the slow as hell myah thread (the OP was made in 2022) because this is appropriate to ask in the context of her thread where the information isn't publicly available
Since the start of 2024 this moderation team's jannies choose the most absolutely retarded times to pick and choose when to move their asses about. Major disruptive things and actual global rules being broken (remember the Asian male thread in /ot/) == crickets, minor shit that has never been against the rules will randomly get redtexted
No. 95628
>>95624They aren't hags, they're a bunch of men. Admin of JunkoChan confirmed that 90% of IPs associated with that IB are from males - mostly perverted moids that use TOR and Onion browsers to amass huge quantities of revenge porn and frequent tranny hypno-fetish Telegram groups. That website is frequently discussed in far-right circles (especially with links to terror groups in Kashmir and Chechnya) and at this point the mention of it should be autobanned on this website. Anons like
>>95623 have probably been indoctrinated by Extremist Fascist groups and therefore feel at home in that awful web prison. Remember that if you don't use the darkweb to access that site then the admin collects ALL your personal information (including credit card details saved to your browser) and sells them to degenerates online. Protect yourself and AVOID JonkaChan
No. 95630
File: 1751919791822.png (29.34 KB, 1142x207, junkuchan.png)
>>95628Kek. The site isn't perfect but it doesn't have malware.
No. 95631
>>95629Even viewing the board without accessing it through the dark web or specialized browsers puts your immediate data and identifiable information at risk. Don't believe the bad actors like
>>95630 because they are trying to trick you into giving away your personal information to trannies and Neo Nazis. I wish mods would do their job and ban all mentions of that horrible shit website. It's a shit stain on the internet. It was built by a registered sex offender (arrested for raping over 9 women) located in India and the only people dumb enough to use it are trannies and handmaidens with mental disabilities.
No. 95632
>>95631Well I don't have any credit card or personal information saved in my browser. And I use vpn if it means anything.
>neonazis and trans people But I believe you're being batshit insane on this one lol.
> It was built by a registered sex offender (arrested for raping over 9 women)Didn't know it but haven't suprised tbf. Where do you know all of this if you don't mind me asking? I
No. 95633
File: 1751920512761.png (23.19 KB, 328x141, gender poll.png)
>>95632When the Jonkochan team did a gender poll in December this was the result after 36 hours so take it as you will
No. 95639
>>95638Best you can do is reinstall your browser and change the passwords to your emails. If you have your credit card linked to your browser, order a new one with a different number. I have 0 clue why mods don't have the mention of that IB
trigger an autoban yet.
No. 95640
File: 1751921202302.png (24.81 KB, 1570x191, wrong 2.png)
…What??? Who is this retarded farmhand? "sh" is an abbreviation/short way to say "self harming", it's not "self-censoring." You can tell because they didn't censor other words like purging. SH is used frequently, if you're going to be a fucking nazi don't pick and choose
>>>/snow/2111847,
>>>/snow/2130258,
>>>/snow/2134551 No. 95641
>>95602i have a theory that the current newly ''hired'' jannies and farmhands is/are either a troon who bypassed their voice verification, a moid, or a pickme.
There has been so much soyjack avatarfagging blatant moid posters lately who can't integrate for shit and they just get left…unbanned and when they do get banned it's a really short ban.
As someone who has lurked on male imageboard the male tourists here are so blatant….yet for some reason this new administration can't notice that? Weird, how are you a farmhand yet you can't spot obvious bait or robots. It smells like smegma up in here.
Not only has the moderation become so slow (that's why the implemented the vpn ban in the first place s they could work less) but when the jannies do get online and check up on the reports they just dismiss most of them, what's going on.
No. 95650
File: 1751925758172.jpg (66.94 KB, 880x441, baiting.jpg)
>>95649It was pretty obvious but i can see why some of you would believe that, i just took a quick glance through their lc hate thread to confirm as well and oh, who would have thought?
No. 95653
File: 1751933664443.jpeg (Spoiler Image,472.65 KB, 1026x1336, 4f133330-5706-4305-8ade-efb954…)
Picrel is literally the admin of JC, I don't know why some anons are trying to justify using the board of a serial rapist schizo lolicon
No. 95668
>>95667Ntayrt I don't think that's a good alternative because this is an ongoing issue in the UK right now, and there's more to talk about than the initial news story itself, such as law enforcement and the government refusing to prosecute. It would end up taking over the thread like the britbong one, which is what anon is trying to avoid.
I think having its own thread is a net good, there's a lot to discuss and anons in other countries may feel inclined to chime in with similar stories as well.
No. 95671
>>95670I think it should. The UK phenomenon is an egregious irl example, but the fact that there are trooncords out there doing the same thing with no action from law enforcement is just as disturbing.
Insane to me Keffals was never prosecuted in some way for sexual conduct involving minors.
No. 95676
>>95665>>95670Yes please! I understand why nonnas would come here for that but the thread is unusable at this point and is overdue for a containment thread so the topic gets the attention it's deserved and not burried. I second a general grooming gang thread, a UK specific one is too niche. Like another anon said you'll have to be vigilant with ignoring and reporting racebait or polfags
>>95673NTA but that's not a good idea, the subject is talked about a lot outside of LC but only because the perpetrators are non-white/british. Nobody outside of LC actually cares about the women here being victimised by these gangs they just hate that it's not them doing it to us. Reddit especially wouldn't care kek. It would be better to talk about it here because most of us know what the real problem is, moids, and we view women as people not possessions
No. 95677
>>95634On the contrary, I believe the redtext list is due for an update
>CW/content warning>fascist/fascism>queer>sex worker>assorted self censors and tone indicatorsand most importantly
>y'all/yall>>95664meh, rolls off the tongue better than "race and gender communist"
>>95655Only backseat mods use this thread
…yes, I realize the irony of what I'm saying
No. 95685
>>95682Blame the gender havers and their appropriation of yall + folks / folx.
>>95684Yank/we used in the US refers to northeners, hashtag not all yanks.
No. 95688
File: 1752012175504.jpg (382.41 KB, 1080x2110, soren.jpg)
>>95534soren's been active on goodreads starting from 3 months after her 2nd "death" (april 2021) until as recently as june 19th 2025
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/39201711-soren No. 95690
File: 1752014456412.jpg (196.11 KB, 848x1280, 1000041934.jpg)
>>95689This is how the OPs looked before you started obsessively pushing your own unfunny OPs.
No. 95698
>>95696>ban her for a weekEven better: lock Unpopular Opinions for a week. We all know that it'd bring down the # of reports that jannies have to shift through. And it'd make retards like
>>95697 mald even harder.
No. 95712
>>95687Mods banned tooth talk in Venus' thread because it was basically tinfoiling with no end of speculation, they banned it in Silvie's thread because we had a bunch of retarded weebs trying to convince anons that ugly yellow crooked teeth are actually super ~kawaii desu ne~ in Japan. It's not the same at all. Of course anons are gonna bring up how she "struggles" with communication a lot, because her retarded way of wording things and her speech issues are funny to laugh at.
>>95709Majority of the anons that use /w/ are retarded washed up weebs that think religiously watching anime in their teenage years makes them experts in Japanese culture and society. Silvie's thread is besieged by WKs because speds hate the fact that we're talking about one of their current weeb idorus.
No. 95721
>>95719Nitpicking refers to pointing out
minor, petty, negligible faults, her teeth are pretty glaringly awful, and I don't see an issue in pointing them out or stating one's disgust unless it starts to dominate the conversation and take the place of discussing actual milk. What I saw was that certain stans get defensive, perhaps because they can relate and they're used to posting in their hugbox corners of the internet where everyone is
valid and you can't say meany nono things because it's not nice to point out physical flaws, even though this site was built on petty gossip such as that. Funny how this isn't a problem in the ridiculous photoshoppers or egirls thread so i'm not sure why Silvie gets special treatment all of a sudden.
No. 95726
>>95722Because there are very few active mods left, so the remaining staff needed to cut back on workload. Laur, LJ's mother, often used VPNs to post schizo ramblings in the thread. Sometime in 2024 (IIRC), staff made the decision to delete any posts that she makes. Since there are so few active mods now, they opted to put a VPN ban on the thread sometime in 2025 so that they don't have to expend time moderating the thread. Most days now, there is anywhere from 12-18 hours of no moderation on LC. If Laur started a schizo babbling fest at midnight, moderators might not discover it for 9-10 hours, in which time many anons would have begun responding to Laur and
triggering her. Since the VPN blocks Laur, it alleviates the workload for remaining staff members.
Too few realize how bare bones the staff is right now.
No. 95727
>>95726no one realizes this shit because no one fucking says anything and admin isn't accepting applications. there is less transparency here than with some of our worst admins. also schizo ranting by cows shouldn't be deleted randomly and is infact a staple to many threads. admin is too autistic to realize this site is for documentation AND
discussion not some autist wiki page. i am onboard with admin trying to save bandwidth, the site is probably going to push her into a higher payment tier soon. if she needs assistance in purchasing an archival host with lower bandwidth costs and implementing ads to save money i suggest she do that.
No. 95729
>>95727>no one fucking says anythingHave you ever been about to quit your job, like in 2 weeks time, but you have some big project you're supposed to finish? Your boss will come over every now and again to inquire about its status, and you just smile and nod even though you know well that you're not working on the project and you'll be long gone before it's ever finished? You spare yourself the consequences of your unfinished work. That's the atmosphere right now.
They don't release information because they know that if they actually come out and say how poorly it's going, it'll just open up the site to attacks, raids, and user discontent. Maybe they think that admitting mistakes or failures makes them look weak, and maybe that's why Cerbmin has showed 0 accountability throughout their term as admin.
>Site gets hacked, goes down for weeks, and hundreds of thousands of images are lost? Oh, that was a hack. It's done now.
>Unpopular thread that brings hundreds of unintegrated tourists from Reddit, Tumblr, and Twitter, that apparently generates 50% of reports on any given day? Oh, we're gonna ban it after 6 months. It's done now.
>Moderation nosedive, in both quality and quantity over the past 2 years.Oh, we had janny applications open, silly, we just didn't tell anybody and didn't link it anywhere.
There's never actually any substance.
No. 95730
>>95728What kind of unpopular opinion because the past few days have just been shit like "
race bad and should be exterminated" and retarded scrote tier bait about women being whores or some shit
No. 95741
>>95733Site rules take precedent over thread rules. Nobody wants to see yet another "
insert color people bad" or "girls are most fertile at the age of 10" post
No. 95744
File: 1752104889972.png (258.41 KB, 1884x560, 645645564456645.PNG)
How is offhandedly mentioning that BL exists fujosperging? I'm not even a fujo and there was no infight/derailment happening. For context, these posts were in direct response to this question which was not redtexted:
>Nonnas, do you prefer your Husbandos or BL OTPs to be from dedicated BL media, Otome games or other female made genres, or do your Nigels tend to be from Shounen or other Male target demographic media like most vidya, etc?
No. 95750
The level of whiteknighting allowed in /w/ is insane.
>>>/w/352452We do not need to take any cow's word about anything. Cows lie. It's what they do. Mikan does not provide any information about her manufacturers for a reason. There are certifications she could provide. She doesn't provide them.
There was no "infighting" in this thread. You have a rabid wk dead-set on defending the cow. Why didn't the post I linked get a redtext after the farmhand warning? Because it was fawning over the cow?
No. 95769
>>95765Kpop retards would not be able to behave at all. I used to be one too and I was crazy. Putting up crazy fans who stand different groups is a recipe for disaster.
Go to x if you want to sledge about kpop.
No. 95773
>>95772As someone who's been here since 2015 - K-pop was banned because the kpopfags they attracted were quite literally insane in every sense of the word and brought in the worst kind of audience off the site. They were the blackpill posters of yesteryear, besides the racebait they couln't stay in their containment, brought their turf wars over to every single other thread, treated Lolcow like their personal twitter account and their drama was archetypal sasaeng shit like calling already anorexic female idols ugly fat cows, unhinged parasocial crushes on the male idols and the utter denial of the exploitative and
abusive nature of the k-pop industry because they wanted to treat these idols like their personal dartboards. Burritomin gave them a lot of chances to straighten their ways, they always fucked it up, and they were thrown out. There's an entire imageboard for them to post on anyway.
No. 95783
File: 1752232997416.jpeg (148.68 KB, 1284x827, IMG_3488.jpeg)
i knew the /w/ mod was retarded but holy shit. they seriously need to be replaced. in silvie's thread
No. 95790
File: 1752266208786.png (36.15 KB, 1045x231, Screenshot 2025-07-11 222900.p…)
>>95755>you need proof circumstantial proof has always been acceptable on IBs, and even in court. You don't get to just claim everything is ethical, post no information about where your products come from, and then sell clothes/shoes with basic bases available all over taobao. No one has to take a cow's word for anything.
picrel: from Mikan's site. Many sweatshops, including Shein's sweatshops, are located in Guangzhou. Why doesn't she name her manufacturer if they are ethical?
No. 95794
>>95793Why does everything need to be spelled out as simply as possible for some of these /w/ people? No one said that she isn't allowed to be criticized
if her factories are. She should prove it. Tinfoiling it's true when she says it isn't gets the thread no traction. Also that area is the manufacturing capital of China. Everything is there. You can have ethical warehouses and if her prices are high, that's how she affords wholesale better quality things. This is such a boring thing to go back and forth about because anons won't even take a second to think about other factors.
No. 95809
Can the jannies start reading?
>>>/snow/2136183 was banned for AI outside of containment but the first sentence of the post relays that no AI was used. Should have just been banned for fanfic.
No. 95826
File: 1752349793199.png (10.3 KB, 1188x91, Screenshot 2025-07-12 214125.p…)
blatant moid posters will post shit like this on the unpopular opinions thread every single fucking day, then the moderators will do nothing about it and then give them a short 6 hour bait ban after a day passes.
But when it comes to kpop or fujo posts then the moderators are there within 10 minutes handing out lengthy bans. Im just wondering what are these double standards, because i will see the moderators be active on certain off-topic threads at the same time that someone is baiting, so this means that you do see the bait but you purposefully avoid it? That's strange, why are you as a moderator avoiding banning certain posters and shielding them. Either way off-topic has now become soyjack central, all i see is blatant moid posters who are doing a bad job at integrating and any anon who calls them out gets silenced by moderators with a scrotefoiling ban. Seems like the moderators love gargling on balls lately, i guess this is now a pickme site just like how it was in 2017.
No. 95832
>>95825speculating = hypothesizing based on circumstances, facts, clues
tinfoil = pulling wild shit out of your ass without any
basis to a claimhope that helps, the definition is in the rules. speculation is not tinfoil because speculation is based in reality. stop trying to shut down discussion everywhere.
No. 95835
File: 1752361130737.png (477.78 KB, 630x1223, 1000051740.png)
>>95834There are other kinds of evidence beyond screen caps. For reference, here are the rules. Tinfoiling is considered worthless when it is "without basis." The rules do not mention speculation, and for good reason: speculation, both negative and positive, occurs in every thread on this site. It is human nature to speculate based on information.
No. 95851
>>95841Their problem is that they're a
lowkey blatant WK and want to control the discussion so that we're not too critical of their poor neurodivergent weeb icon.
No. 95858
the dumbfuck who doesn't know how to use a spacebar is now drawing and posting guro scat porn of cows
>>>/snow/2136898when are you going to permaban this retard?
No. 95870
File: 1752486794731.jpeg (63.11 KB, 687x447, images (17).jpeg)
What is the current population of lolcow? How many nonnies am I actually talking to on average?
No. 95872
File: 1752489465802.jpeg (58.51 KB, 600x474, IMG_5556.jpeg)
>>95870It’s just you and me anon ♥
No. 95874
>>95872Gayyy
Also fujo derail in the uma musume thread
No. 95877
File: 1752508843092.webp (22.76 KB, 761x380, thisiscalleda-abbreviation.web…)
Mods, admins, this is called an abbreviation, not a self censor. No one is saying unalive or grape on lolcow, because how is SA a self censor? I just don't understand the nitpicking on some threads anymore.
No. 95881
File: 1752510187600.jpg (120.68 KB, 834x720, 098b448fdb030696a178a03ab1a0a5…)
>>95879The jannys fall for recency bias so hard. First falling for the "redditspacing" meme while not understanding it at all and thinking it meant every instance of a double line break needs to be banned as if they just started using the internet yesterday. Now with assuming every abbreviation has to do with TikTok. Idiots. use your brain a little. picrel are the farmhands as people.
No. 95888
>>95884>>95885The anons in that thread are really arguing over which interpretation of the game is slightly less retarded than the other, instead of just, you know,
not doing that and posting about something else kek
No. 95895
>>95893They aren't going to stop until after mod ban the right people. Only red texting a couple posts tells the retards to keep fighting and to keep responding. So miserable
>>95894>>95888I miss "don't feed the troll" being a meme. Everyone forgot
No. 95899
File: 1752537100718.png (30.28 KB, 1232x248, dumb.png)
>>95877Why is this a thing now? Why are abbreviations randomly considered a "self censor"? Its so random and inoffensive and Ive genuinely never seen a single person complain about this. Notice how the post directly above mine also says "sh" with no ban lmao. Incredibly odd and nitpicky moderating
No. 95905
>>95901That anon specifically said:
>because who the fuck wants to write sexual assault?That means that she finds typing out the words ‘sexual assault’ to be upsetting, which is a bit odd since she has no problem discussing it.
No. 95907
Used this site for a long time (at least pre-2020, maybe spiritually a newfag
I used staminarose if that helps) but somehow never knew [Archived Copy] on links can actually work since every one I've ever tried to click hasn't been snapshot on the archive. It's only because of this post
>>>/snow/2136692 that I do (thank you). I ctrl+f'd the rules for related keywords which I have definitely read more than once before and it's not mentioned in the post box either.
So my recommendation would be to include this in the rules for those of us who like to contribute to threads. I have manually archived the links offsite before myself which was a pain in the bum.
No. 95913
File: 1752578209906.jpg (267.49 KB, 925x629, Screenshot_20250715_124211_Sam…)
Could you please do something about the infighting retard in the Lucinda thread once and for all ?
You can't even say : "hey, take what she says with a grain of salt, she's a cow and cows are known for their lies" without them attacking you or reporting your post as bait.
Why WKing, infighting, tinfoiling, moralfagging, and writing insane fanfictions is allowed in that thread ? It's really bizarre.
No. 95921
>>95916>omfgIt's "oh my fucking God," not "omfg." So tired of you retarded newfags like you that refuse to integrate into our culture. On this website, we type in proper grammar, use proper punctuation, and don't use stupid abbreviations like "omfg." Moderators have been exceedingly patient with retards like you thus far, but in the future I hope that the staff decides to permanently ban newfags that refuse to integrate. Typing in all lowercase, using abbreviations, not ending sentences with periods: these are all serious offenses that should be permanently banned henceforth. Our beautiful imageboard is meant to preserve and catalog lolcows, therefore it is incredibly important that all communications are fashioned in the correct methods. This isn't Facebook, or Instagram, or the loathsome TikTok… this is lolcow.farm, and you need to respect our rules and culture. From this point on, please refrain from using idiotic, foolish, pathetic language like "omfg," and type your words properly using conventional style, including APA formatting for any and all references. Moderators, please ban the anon to whom I reply to set an example for all others that seek to follow in her doomed endeavor.
No. 95924
>>95921kek. wait, oh no…
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)
No. 95936
>>95935I had to forward the page, good thing I didn't refresh yet.
>Your ban was filed on Wednesday 19 July, 2023 and has since expired.So no, but wanted to just mention they're guessing just as much as anyone else. It's all about language, but I've seen them say that farmers can have those opinions too. I am usually always for the farmhands decisions, but this seems unfair to be able to
tell when it's not clear to anyone unless they out themselves.
No. 95937
>>95934It's likely dependent on context.
Someone posting "she's parading herself around like fucktrophy on twitter" is unlikely to get anyone banned in a sex worker thread on /snow/.
Someone replying "you're just some moid's fucktrophy" to another poster that mentions they're in a relationship on /ot/ is probably going to get banned for infighting.
Someone posting "women are just worthless fucktrophies" on any board is going to risk being banned for being male.
No. 95941
>>95938I'm crying tears of laughter right now
nonnie what the fuck
No. 95944
>>95940Idk idc. I'm not as autistic as her in husbando taste, and I admit the TV head posting colonized the thread and I'm slightly jealous and bitter that a literal
TV has fans and "sexy" fan art while my literally conventionally attractive human husbando only has me as a fan lmao. But I won't bully them or anything and I guess it's kinda endearing just like the woman who has a Squidward life size plush or the Medic one. I say we should leave her alone and let her chat with the other anons who have the same husbando as her, it's harmless. I also don't want her or anyone else to feel ashamed of posting or talking about their husbando(s) because anons would make fun of them. I know this isn't a safe space or hugbox etc. etc. but I enjoy the vibes on /g/ and the husbando and waifu threads especially so I don't want it to become an unwelcoming environment and die out or something. As long as we don't have annoying personalityfags who do crimes or something and take pictures we're fine.
No. 95961
File: 1752690624732.jpg (116.09 KB, 753x435, tumbleweed-caught-in-fence-two…)
>>95952They just get posted in the wellness influencer thread in /snow/, I wish the farmhands would allow us to reopen the tradthot thread because it would be an entertaining thread with tradthottery is trending right now. But they just ignore…
No. 95964
>>95957Because rehashing old milk and requesting spoonfeeding is ~allegedly~ against the rules but mods are very selective when it comes to banning posts in the thread.
Repetitive comments are banned only if they criticise the cows. When Tom's and TayTay's fans infest the thread and have a "justice for Tom" party, they're are left to shit up the thread and tinfoil to their hearts' desire.
P.S. You talk just like the retard(s) in the thread trying to make Tom into a misunderstood and unfairly judged victim of unfounded rumors, btw. You're so easy to clock No. 95971
File: 1752703242542.png (1.06 KB, 409x248, arrow.png)
This anon in the Shayna thread was banned incorrectly
>>>/snow/2137817That image is not AI. It's an image that I originally posted to the "Is Shayna fat?" on /shay/
>>>/shay/170117I made the image by combining two photographs from the porn agency shoots. I did this manually in Photoshop and it isn't AI.
The source of the first image is here
>>>/snow/641416The source of the second image is here
>>>/snow/2117789 No. 95986
File: 1752728048947.jpg (59.79 KB, 560x532, c8090dc7ef8532910c2a50e516b43f…)
the sharty implemented a manual image approval system a while ago and i really wish we could have something like that too. but i know the mods are already overworked and understaffed to also be expected to manage that. its just a pipe dream i guess.
No. 95990
>>95988it's basically 1-2 anons trying to provoke infights. There's no reason to lock the thread. It's a slow thread anyway, it's not that big of a deal.
>>95985It's actually milk that her brand brags about being ethical (this is something she pulls out all the time), but she has literally no proof to show for that. Just "trust me bro." I'm shocked she was able to say that stuff about her brand in the German market because at least in food sectors, you need proof if you're going to claim your brand is organic or cruelty-free. I assume there's some regulation about ethical production in Germany/EU as well, but I don't know that sector.
I'd actually love to continue this discussion in her thread because
up until last week I just assumed she did have some certifications. I didn't care to look into it because I just thought, ah, anons are probably overreacting or not reading the fine print; she can't possibly be saying all this shit about ethical production without some kind of documentation. But that's exactly what she's doing.
So I do want to know why we can't discuss a business owner making a huge claim about her business without a single piece of evidence. Or at least just let us discuss it? If she releases some kind of proof or certification of ethical production, then the topic can be put to rest. But until she does, there's actual sleuthing work by farmers that can be done about this issue.
No. 95996
>>95992>It is not the culture of LC to lock a thread that a couple of anons dislike.And that's why this site is dying.
Anons act like there can be no innovation or no changes and then wonder why this site is garbage nowadays. Moderators need to step up and make these sorts of executive decisions more often for the benefit of everyone.
No. 95999
>>95997I'm just saying. We all said that Luigi threads were gonna shit up the site with tourists back in December, took them until last month to ban them. We've all been saying that the Dysphoria and BP threads were bringing in TIFs and retards and to ban them, took them until last month to ban the threads. Hiding threads works for nothingburgers threads, but at a certain point we have to see the forest for the trees and realize that certain threads aren't good for the community as a whole. Staff needs to start actually listening to the userbase instead of thinking that they're above the userbase.
It's not 2015 anymore. Shit that worked in 2015 isn't guaranteed to work in 2025.
No. 96002
>>95998It would be better labelled as an ugliness vent thread, most of what anons do there is just vent rather than talk about how they actually cope with being ugly. It's misleading for anons who want to offer advice since they always get dogpiled on
>>96000I'm brown but sure. What intriguing logic
No. 96007
>>95992 It's created entitlement from newfags who think spam like 4chan belongs here, and it's only on certain boards it's allowed. The cow boards are just now following their listed rules we've had for years and we have an admin who is following through along with farmhands. A lot of these posts shouldn't have been unmoderated to begin with imo. Not to say some moderating still isn't wrong, but for threads like Taylor's it's been clear for years now that it's been kept alive by this idea she's a "legacy cow" and that's all.
>>96004You mean where she never claims she's asian, but you want anons to believe she did somewhere and won't post caps backing up your accusation? Just because she hasn't said "I'm NOT ASIAN" doesn't mean she is when she's telling people she's Turkish or Slav. That's the opposite. It's almost like makeup is just makeup.
No. 96013
>>96012Being logical means you're a whiteknight for all these /w/ posters, don't you know? If you aren't shitting on the cow somewhere in your post you're suddenly a fan/wk/sabotaging. These people aren't farmers and their vendettas are so obvious. No one wants to shut down discussion just because we don't want the threads to derail into fanfics and tinfoils. Sorry,
speCulAtIon.
No. 96015
File: 1752791865281.jpg (234.15 KB, 676x1068, gm.jpg)
>>95961Actually came here to ask about this? Lauren Southern appears to be doing her annual flounce off and is publishing her autobiography (about which, kek) spills tea on basically everyone (cokehead Tommy Robinson, etc.) and describes being sexually assaulted by Andrew Tate.
Seems pretty milky?
https://archive.is/7DK1b No. 96063
File: 1752869141267.jpeg (38.95 KB, 680x583, IMG_1837.jpeg)
What is with all the baiting in UMA lately? It’s in response to several different moids, so it’s not a vendetta. I’m starting to think it’s a tranny/scrote (will I get banned for “scrotefoiling” even if I say ‘I think’ instead of ‘I’m sure’?) and it’s fucking annoying to scroll through both UMA and /g/ as a whole and see some sperg trying to be witty but just coming out sounding like an underage tard.
I know there’s been baiting on several threads on /g/ (including the CMA one), so I’m starting to wonder if it’s the same person.
No. 96066
File: 1752890353125.jpg (27.01 KB, 420x630, 5vwax46l28931.jpg)
Can a mod ban me for 5 minutes? Is it even possible?
If its not don't ban me at all Im having a bad day I was attacked by a scrote duck and I had to T pose to get him to stop biting my feet(ok)
No. 96070
File: 1752940808400.jpg (17.76 KB, 275x275, 1731531314620.jpg)
It's time to wrap up the Lucinda threads. She recovered and is pursuing a normal life, there's no milk being posted anymore and all the recent updates are just infighting from very obvious EDtwt users left over from Ambrose who want to use it as a snark subreddit. Lucinda isn't even schizoposting about turning into a unicorn anymore like the milk has legitimately dried to a crisp
No. 96074
>>96070Like the other anon said, it’s only been two weeks, kek. Lucinda is one of few cows that I have sympathy for, schizophrenia faking or not, but it’s not time yet.
I do think the edtwt users and super
valid/Skinniest Of Them All anachans who use her thread need to start getting permabanned, though.
No. 96076
The British thread has been full of anons posting racebait for months. I don’t buy that it’s all being posted by women who are concerned about grooming gangs considering that there are posts such as these:
>>>/ot/2608849>>>/ot/2608915>>>/ot/2606105>>>/ot/2606245Which are either blaming women for male violence which does not add up with the ‘we’re just women posting about violent males’ defence that these anons trot out whenever they get called out, or their gay civil/racewar fantasy that they say will happen any day now. It’s obviously men who only post about non-white men raping women to make themselves look better by comparison and downplay any sexual or physical violence towards women when it’s committed by white men. As is seen in these posts:
>>>/ot/2611330>>>/ot/2611358>>>/ot/2609525This has been a problem for months of anons refusing to integrate and posting constant racebait. It stifles any actual discussion that could be had in that thread because it’ll just get drowned out by racebait.
No. 96077
>>96076Seconded. This post
>>>/ot/2596161breaks down immigrant groups into very specific factions that I wouldn't have a clue about and then the civil war shit. Incredibly suspicious. Feels very /pol/tardy.
No. 96078
>>96076>or their gay civil/racewar fantasy that they say will happen any day nowCivil war is a real possibility for reasons explained in the thread. What is happening in the UK mirrors closely mirros the proceeding events to several civil wars, notably the Spanish Civil War where the fascists won and remained in power for decades. It's also possible compare the current political situation with the Weimar Republic and we all know how that ended. Globally we are already in the opening stages of WWIII with three current active but low intensity fronts. A forth could potentially open in Caucasia, with the fifth front being expected to open in East Asia. It would be extremely easy for Russia or China to use their intelligence assets to exploit the existing tensions in the UK to cause civil unrest and even civil war. It would be convenient method of neutering one of the larger NATO powers. The Russian Civil War did exactly this in WWI.
A potential civil war is already being discussed in the media.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/03/civil-war-is-coming-to-britain/https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/taking-warnings-of-civil-war-seriously/https://unherd.com/2025/04/is-civil-war-coming-for-britain/If you have no knowledge of history and no interest in geopolitics, then learn2scroll past posts that you don't want to read.
>It’s obviously men who only post about non-white men raping women to make themselves look better by comparisonThis is mentally deranged. It's a women's website, women are going to discuss issues impacting women and women being raped and sexually assaulted by immigrants in Europe is a huge issue and has been for over a decade. All statistics from European countries show that immigrant men commit sex crimes at higher rates than native European moids. It's not racism, it's reality.
Notice that statistics showing troons committing sex crimes against women and children at higher rates than straight men can be posted all day but the instant a European woman posts statistics showing that immigrants commit sex crimes against women and children at higher rates, someone instantly cries about it in /meta/. The levels if cognitive dissonance required to allow one but want to censor the other must be extreme. No group of moids should be treated as a protected class immune from criticism.
>>96077>Feels very /pol/tardy.God forbid women take an interest in politics and want to fight for their rights. The suffragettes should have just stayed home and worked on their cross stitching instead of becoming /pol/tards.
No. 96082
>>96078>This is mentally deranged. It's a women's website, women are going to discuss issues impacting women How do you explain these posts?
>>>/ot/2608849>>>/ot/2608915 Do these seem like things a woman would say? Do you really believe that they were posted by women concerned about male violence? What about this one?
>>>/ot/2611330>Some groups of men are better than othersDo you really believe that these are being posted out of a concern for women? It could not be more obvious that it is men treating this website as an extension of /pol/.
No. 96084
>>96078Not either anon but please, you and the others who talk about this need your own threads at this point. The grooming gangs one mentioned above
>>95665 is a good start. If trump has his own hate thread, when he is mostly tied to US politics, it's not too much to ask for you guys to have one for yourselves. I bite my tongue about this when it comes up but you anons bring up muslim men all day and night, you haven't seemed to realise you have let them invade our bong thread too. It's the only conversation in there anymore. I don't want to silence the anons there, heavens know that it happens so much in day-to-day life. I'm happy you all have a place to openly discuss it but I have to ask, is this all there is to talk about as British people? Crimes that muslim men commit? We are more than that and you know it but there seems to be no room for discussions of anything else, just all muslims, immigration, grooming gangs.
No. 96087
>>96085>>96085Why? There's already too many annoying redtexts like
victim and
abusive even though they are just words
No. 96089
>>96087When this site took off, anti-SJW sentiments were full-force from anons. I think since those words were used willy-nilly by cows at the time, it got that redtext.
Triggered gets it too, IIRC.
No. 96090
>>96082>Do these seem like things a woman would say?Yes. Women are just as capable of being bigoted and hateful as men. Both posts were rightly banned for racebait but there is no indication that it was moids posting. The farmhands will use "moid" redtext if a banned poster was a male. It's more likely that it was posted intentionally to illicit a negative response. This isn't the first time a video has been posted in the thread and used as racebait to try and start an infight.
>Do you really believe that these are being posted out of a concern for women? It could not be more obvious that it is men treating this website as an extension of /pol/.When statistics show that one group of men commits violence, sexual assault and rape against women at significantly lower rates than others, describing that group as being "better" than other men is perfectly rational from a woman's perspective. This is like trying to censor someone for saying that leaving a toddler alone in a room with jack russel is better than leaving a toddler alone in a room with a pitbull.
>>96084>Not either anon but please, you and the others who talk about this need your own threads at this pointI agree that dedicated threads would be a better solution and would go as far as saying that politics needs to be banned from all country threads because derailing and infighting over politics is a persistent problem. If a more general thread gets to a point where all discussion is being smothered by a single topic then that topic needs it's own thread.
>We are more than that and you know it but there seems to be no room for discussions of anything else, just all muslims, immigration, grooming gangs.Again I agree. My point of contention with the above poster is not that Britbong threads need to be nothing but news stories of immigrants harming women and children, it's that women expressing concern over the the threat to their safety posed by immigrant moids should not be censored or banned.
No. 96109
File: 1753064759180.jpg (232.37 KB, 899x657, 1000010753.jpg)
I know unpopular opinio is the bait and infight central but for the love of god can't you ban the obvious male posters? You get a scrotefoiling ban in less than an hour but you let retards like this derail the threads for hours. If you're going to let obvious scrote posters then unban scrotefoiling, this is turning into reddit.(scrotefoiling)
No. 96112
>>96109nonny what is male or masculine about…having a conversation and asking questions? kek
>>96110go back
No. 96113
File: 1753073100643.png (47.22 KB, 1319x494, Screenshot 2025-07-20 214422.p…)
lock the fucking lucinda thread already. there's no milk it's just a bunch of autists who want to wk her and "protect" her.
No. 96118
>>96116mods must be lucinda asslickers too
>>96117like 5 people just cowtipped. you are not supposed to cowtip. did you guys come in from xitter? i hate all of you.
No. 96122
>>96118Are you ESL? I already said cowtippers are retarded. What I’m saying is that it’s weird to expect women to not sympathize with DV
Victims, because, like I said, that even happened in 2016/2017 with Shayna. Let me dumb it down: cowtipping is stupid, sympathizing with an abuse
victim is normal and not WK’ing. The actual white-knighting is the anons acting like she’s completely faultless and pure — even if she’s mentally ill, she’s still accountable for the fucked-up shit she does — which many do.
No. 96126
>>96118>5 people cowtipped Are you retarded? It's only one and everyone told her she's stupid for it because she is.
And nonas feeling sorry for cows isn't new. We aren't heartless sociopaths. Nobody here enjoys women getting beaten and abused, right? I sure hope you don't
No. 96127
>>96124> Plebbit, the site infamous for being a hotspot for MRAs and men who jack it to children and big-boobie vidya girls, is where Lucinda-anons should migrate to for the crime of being concerned about her being with a woman-beaterHoly kek. I don’t check up on Lucinda that much because I do not have the patience for her schizobabble, but
>>96125 is right. Report the cowtippers, and once you’re done with that, make it yourself. Even though Lolcow isn’t some sort of feminist haven (we focus the most on other women, after all) having basic human concern for another woman isn’t something unheard of here, and hasn’t been for literal years.
No. 96128
>>96125No, it wasn't me posting in her thread but I think it's a good idea.
If you want to praise her, attacks any dissenting opinions, be a annoying moralfag and cowtip, go make a fan subreddit and crack down on any snark posts if necessary.
This way you could have your little circle jerk without mean anons mocking her fake typing, selfposting and overall retardation.
By the way, if you really believe that Luci is as vulnerable and mentally ill as you think she is, why you'd want her to be discussed on a website known for its huge nitpicking tendency ? How exposing her on a gossip board is "protecting her" ?
I'm genuinely asking.
No. 96132
>>96130I wasn't referring to the recent situation with her scrote, and he can die in a ditch for all I care, but to the overall vibe of these threads in general.
The samefagging, selfposting, the way you're not allowed to emit any slight critic.
If you tried that shit in any other threads, you'd be met with a ban, and rightfully so.
You know damn well that this "we must protect her at all costs, rules doesn't applies to me and that thread, I can WK, cowtip and provoke endless infighting because I like her" isn't new.
That's why several anons suggested to make a subreddit for her fangirls to congregate. If you're that unwilling to follow the rules, then that place isn't for you.
No. 96133
>>96132You were referring to the current situation because you were crying about cowtipping a few posts earlier. Get your own story straight.
>>96131You're probably right about who it is.
No. 96135
>>96133I think the first you tagged is different than the anon who was shitting her pants, and she has actual concerns about how anons act in that thread. Whenever I saw it on the front page I’d see anons sperging about how Lucinda is the “only pure cow” and shit like that, kek, which is a genuine issue.
The other one who was sperging about how it’s moralfagging to care about her boyfriend being a woman-beater typed in all lowercase, while the one you’re responding to bothers to capitalize.
No. 96137
>>96133I'm not that anon nor a ~jealous edtwt fatty~ (seriously, that accusation is getting real old) and there's several of us responding to you.
Would you care to address any of my points or you'll just keep deflecting ?
No. 96139
>>96131go to literally any other cow's thread and you won't see the moralfagging and handwringing
>>96135>it’s moralfagging to care about her boyfriend being a woman-beaterso you're going to cowtip and contribute to a thread that has zero milk
this is a gossip website No. 96156
>>96151the only other "cow" this happened to was kelly. you guys don't give a shit about any of the other cows in
abusive homes or with
abusive boyfriends. you laugh at them. you mock people who show concern.
you are the one skirting past board culture and breaking a basic rule, which is to never cowtip, because you care about lucinda. go to her twitter and talk to her then. that's not what this site is for.
No. 96157
>>96156> You (again)I am not even a Lucindafag or the one single cowtipper, you schizo. If this isn’t the site to moralize, why the fuck are you doing it now by going “what about all the other cows!1!1!1!!”?Very moralfaggy and sympathetic of you, anon. I never got into Tophiachu but weren’t anons were concerned for her over her home life too.
Lolcow isn’t going to be complete menace all the time like incognito Twitterfags, who sperg out on here because they don’t have to worry about being “cancelled”, expect it to be. I don’t think you have the reading comprehension skills that the minimum age on this site should possess, so either read anons’ (because it’s not just one anon, and not every anon is the one cowtipper or one of her whiteknights) disagreements more slowly or go back.
No. 96167
>>96165Everyone with an IQ over 80 knows that that thread is a poorly-crafted gayop just like all your other faggotry is.
>Sperg out about a topic>Get banned for sperging>Make a thread about the topic but from the other side>Go to /meta/ to reeee about how the other side is allowed so you should totes be allowed to sperg about it>Get banned>RepeatGroundhog day on this IB I swear to God
No. 96172
>>96165Its so tiresome.. also
>State of Israel Kek sure fed. What shitty bait hellweek can't come sooner
No. 96173
>>96165>thread for amerifagsok
>thread for britbongsok
>threads for various euro countries and euro generalok
>thread for braziliansok
>thread for desi anonsok
>thread for ex muslimsok
>thread for jewish anonsTHIS MUST BE CENSORED IMMEDIATELY
Yeah, nah, fuck off with this shit. Jewish women as a group should be allowed to have their own thread. I'm not a pro-Israel but blaming the actions of the Israeli government on all jews is retarded. It's like condemning the entire American population for the atrocities committed in Vietnam or Iraq.
No. 96175
>>96173this. I saw the thread and came here because I knew some retard like
>>96165 will cry about it.
No. 96178
>>96176>you arent fooling anyone by pretending its a thread relating to judaism when it has isreal and isreali "jews" in the opNo shit, a thread for both jews that live outside of Israel and for jews that live inside Israel specifies this in the OP.
>and is encouraging discussing for it when all other mention of it gets banned in other threadsIt gets banned because it's racebait. The subject of jews and zionism has been brought up as a discussion topic many times in the tinfoil thread and it's unusual for anyone to get banned. Both pro-Israel and anti-Israel sentiments were posted, yet no one was banned because the anons in the thread were able to have a calm discussion without resorting to race or religion based insults.
>whats stopping anyone from making a neo nazi thread because its similar to zionism?It's not a thread specifically for zionism, it's a general thread for jewish anons. Not all jews are zionists, there are many sects of Judaism and some of them are anti-zionist. Some jews support the existence of Israel but not committing genocide against Palestinians. Some secular jews don't identify with Isreal at all. Israeli media is heavily censored, so jewish anons will probably find value in anonymous discussion about current events.
Again I am not pro-Israel and I think the actions of the Israeli government are evil but blaming this on all jews is extremely ignorant. Any group of people is going have a wide range of opinions and condemning any group or country because of the actions of their government is retarded.
This is an image board and calling for censorship is fucking newfag cancer.
No. 96184
>>96163tards arent given passes on lolcow. none of them. not even drug addicts who have ruined their brains to the point theyve turned retarded. and even legit retards are capable of lying on the internet. the repetitive nature of a thread is due to the cow itself. shayna's shit never changes. you might wanna find an invite to the discord PULL if this
triggers you so much and talk about her there instead, because theres no reason to keep crying to the mods this often, its comes across as "mods I don't like this conversation and want it to stop"
>>96178>This is an image board and calling for censorship is fucking newfag cancer.that’s the problem with newfags. they think they can cry hard enough and the mods will shut down everything.
No. 96189
>>96163She gets whiteknighted so much compared to literally every other cow on here kek
>>96166This is true and very stupid though
No. 96212
File: 1753194751142.jpeg (171.97 KB, 1140x665, IMG_9174.jpeg)
genuine question, does this kind of shit crop up in the threads for black girls/asian girls/mena girls or any other countries, like the britbong thread?
No. 96220
What is with this obsessive retard going on and on about how a bio woman must be a tranny becuase they don't sound feminine enough for them and they don't look pretty enough to be a woman?
>>>/w/353671 They ban evade just to sperg about it.
No. 96225
>>96221It's going to turn /ot into /pol
Both those threads need to be locked immediately.
No. 96235
>>96233lolcow is the only safe woman only space online, and it would be a massive blunder and shame if they allowed those threads to continue, attracting the worst kind of pol tars and edgelord summefags.
>>96234Exactly. We dont need that shit here. Turn on any news channel or any other online space and it's all they talk about. Hell, we couldnt even escape it at eurovision this year.
No. 96239
File: 1753199333019.png (1.3 MB, 1170x2289, idiocracy.png)
seriously? this is how we’re going to let /ot/ die?
No. 96246
>>96244Yeah that is true, makes sense if they have to ask cerb for permission
>>96243I noticed that too, some posts are just getting straight up removed which is fine by me
No. 96248
>>96239I don’t know why everyone is upset, just hide the thread or ask for it to be moved to /int/. I would be happy that it will act as a containment thread so they can just shit that up instead of all the other threads. This site is too fashy hiveminded
>>96235> safe woman only spacekek idk about safe
No. 96266
File: 1753201669988.gif (189.97 KB, 111x124, 1368154117994.gif)
>>96253>>96258The gc/radfem/pp threads were originally moved from /ot/ to /2X/, so they weren't banned. Moving a thread to a dedicated board isn't censorship, it's how image boards and internet forums in general work. The reason for it was that the threads became a containment zone for speds that got kicked out of tumblr, reddit and twitter for being gc and not wanting to suck tranny dick. These newfags would not stop troonfoiling, scrotefoiling and infighting because they still had the mentality of SJWs. They weren't used to image boards and seeing opinions they didn't agree with would invoke a fit of tard rage.
>>96261There's literally a gc thread on /ot/ right now.
No. 96271
>>96268Lugia ban was
valid because it was bringing unfavorable characters to the site. I suppose a similar argument could be made for the Israel thread, I'm not really in favor of that thread either. But in general, there's just too many bans for a proper imageboard, in my opinion.
No. 96274
File: 1753202697508.jpg (90.59 KB, 1280x366, l.jpg)
>>96268What was the point of banning it? It's not that anybody cares about /manure/, let alone browses it.
No. 96276
File: 1753202979358.jpeg (180.96 KB, 1284x1738, IMG_6786.jpeg)
>>96274Because we had so many newfags coming solely for that unibrow fuggo that they were even googling “lolcow hidden board” in droves
No. 96303
File: 1753250811919.jpg (35.94 KB, 540x720, IMG_9571.jpg)
Can farmhands ban the goth thread's tranny/handmaiden for the love of God? Like actually permaban it. Every fucking few days this tard and its reddit-spacing comes in to cry about how "no transwoman will rape you in the toilets" and its bans are always temporary. Does it use a VPN or something? Can we finally get rid of it for shitting up the thread and having other anons infight?
No. 96314
>>96313Seconding, why leave up the most shitty posts and moid bait. Not to sound like a twitterfag saying "seeing that shit is
triggering!!" but nobody wants to see posts like that
No. 96331
>>96330>>96328>>96327I don't know what any of this is about but they literally just said the filenames were consecutive. Unsure if that's accurate or not but if it is, I agree that's a decent reason to assume someone is the same poster. Consecutive number filenames + similar bait or typing style would be pretty obvious.
Watch them read here and change it now haha.
No. 96342
>>96331>>96337it's clear that someone feels exposed by the consecutive filename anon. There's always a similar flurry of shitflinging ("some of you are so dumb," etc.) and absurd argumentation whenever nonas point out that, yes, typing styles can ID an anon. There's also a couple of anons who are adamant that cows never post in their own threads, and that every cowposter is really a fake.
Just add it to the pile of things that are wildly unpopular with the usership of this IB, but apparently ok to whoever is manning the ship these days. Often I think they really don't want anyone to use this IB at all. Or they want giant general threads for cows and all the individual threads closed. I wonder if the admin has any priorities or direction for this IB, or if the admin will let some discord kitten run it into the ground. I hope there is some 3rd party who is invested in preserving and archiving this IB in case the lights go off suddenly.
No. 96345
Do better. This skirby shit is getting so old and this poster(s) has made this thread unusable.
>>>/snow/2140519 They've ban evading so many times. I don't know why you guys choose to have them post photos where you can't even see her body
>>>/snow/2139029 in a
photoshop thread. She needs to be tossed off to a Instagram whores you hate thread or something or ban her outright. The posters posting about her do nothing, but shitpost, complain about the moderation, and then just ban and shitpost, samefag, and encourage others to ban evade again.
No. 96372
theres a moid or a troon who keeps sperging on about how banning porn isnt going to help women anyways in both the sexism in videogames thread in m and in ot in the fandom thread
>>>/ot/2622064 (hell he even admitted he doesnt dislike lolishit and rape porn)
No. 96392
>>96391kek he's a moid L posting in the moid L thread. He's doing the thread a service.
>>96382>degenerateit's always so telling that they think lc is 4chin4girls and their faggy little talk is a giveaway.
No. 96399
>>96372That's why you don't let old women and radfems to have power. World doesn't exist for you to pour out your hysteria. As long as I don't harm any real person I should be able to say, own, buy, consume and do whatever the fuck I want. You can fuck off to church and live in a female only commune if human nature
triggers you so much.
(bait) No. 96408
>>96399This post is like a MRA comment bingo card.
>>96407It was barely on from the start.
No. 96410
File: 1753634082963.png (166.44 KB, 1080x590, markup_1000014886.png)
They've already admitted to ban evading, is this what you want running around here?
No. 96419
File: 1753662464034.jpeg (1.29 MB, 1170x2205, IMG_7770.jpeg)
How the fuck is this racebait, it’s a woman killing a hon and it’s a joke
No. 96422
File: 1753671810494.jpeg (296.4 KB, 1170x630, IMG_6337.jpeg)
stop the retarded bans and biases towards cows, why was the person discussing vina’s uncreative designs getting redtexted for “derailing” but the wk replying to her 10 times didn’t have a single redtext?
No. 96423
>>96422Why are you bitching about other posters in the same thread they are posting in and calling them wks? Just report and move on or go to meta. Doing this type of thing baits fighting and then you wonder why the redext tells you the same thing.
>>96413They are even posting their other cows to ban evade and act like it's not them.
>>>/snow/2141342 Anons who have been dealing with them ruining the thread for over a year can spot them so easily.
No. 96447
>>96443,
>>96446If you've seen the way nonas on /g/ act I highly doubt it was raided. Whenever someone called them out for being retarded they got labeled as a scrote or a tourist. /g/ is full of shotafags and nazifags and I'm genuinely convinced people in the Luigi thread were people who mainly use /g/ anyways. Artnonny can find other places to post her gross shitty porn (and knowing her she probably would draw literal shit porn)
No. 96460
Please do something about this farmer who keeps insisting venus wants to be raped when she said she's happy she hasn't been sexually assaulted. Anon says we aren't reading between the lines enough. Get the fucking out of here. This tinfoil from them is disgusting and has no basis.
>>>/pt/962518> Venus is hurt she doesn't get raped. That's why she's trying to brag. She's hurt she's not experiencing the common womanhood of being assaulted.Not what she said at all or even close or suggesting this.
>>>/pt/962388>Reading between the lines, she's seething that no one finds her attractive enough to grope and she misses the attention, so she's trying to act proud that no one harasses her.This is some dumb fuckery ragebait
No. 96463
>>96460Ew. This sounds like one of those alogging tards who gets
way too emotionally invested and worked up about the cows.
No. 96466
>>96460This is 100% bait. The way they talk is very holier-than-thou.
>>>/pt/962519 Very "Whatever do you mean, my good farmer, Venus clearly laments possible sexual harassment and is sweating jealousy". That's how they come off.
No. 96469
>>96455,
>>96456,
>>96459No one is offended they're just saying why it's racebait. What is it with nonnies who just accuse everyone of being a twitterfag? Go back to 4Chan if you want to say the n word so badly with no consequences
No. 96481
>>96480I've been on this site and doing it that way for years
nonnie, you'll live trust me
No. 96502
File: 1753944879932.jpg (164.45 KB, 1344x709, __sakiyama_youji_sweet_pool_dr…)
>>96501>gorefags shotafags and incestfagsAll of them are based and Kiwi are even less tolerant, if not outright hostile, to us.
No. 96507
File: 1753963739743.jpg (86.87 KB, 1700x850, Why_Korean_finger_hearts_are_t…)
>>96504I'm currently unemployed so job hunting, vidya and lc are all I have kek
>>96506Thanks again! Sorry for being a bother
No. 96510
File: 1753982284633.jpg (384.6 KB, 1842x1295, media_Gk9UrtBbQAM-vCc.jpg)
>>96508>report mpreg postingI don't. Perhaps you got a report from the same VPN IP address I used though.