[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password (For post deletion)

Welcome former PULL users!
Click here to start migrating to our sister forum

File: 1496798702583.jpg (10.62 KB, 200x252, TPNyoxo.jpg)

No. 4265

Summarizing tonight's Townhall:

- A new team of moderators and janitors has been hired and is working hard to keep lolcow clean. Staff has an all-new moderation guide with specific ban reasons and times. Bans increase with a factor of 2 for repeat offenses in succession.
- A posting guide for new users will be added in order to integrate them more efficiently rather than filling up threads with attempts to alienate or teach them.
- Users are encouraged to use the reports system to let staff know privately if they agree with moderation decisions (public ones like warnings). This is a way for us to (under consideration of bullshit reports and bias) keep tabs on which moderators reflect the community.
- Posting new threads on /pt/ will be restricted to staff members. For thread continuations, a warning will be posted once a thread has reached 1100 posts (100 posts before bump limit).
From that point, users can submit summaries of recent drama and thread OP pics to a dedicated thread. Staff will then post a continuation thread. Recently, continuations have been missing social media links and summaries, so we'll try this as a solution.
- Posting new threads to /snow/ will be aided by a new post form (pic related). Until the form is installed, a post template will help new users make decent quality threads.
- Race and trans wank will be reduced to one thread each in /ot/ which will be put on autosage.
- Proposed: In times of zero milk, when a thread is mostly speculation, it could be put on autosage until a moderator undoes this when there's fresh drama.
- Nitpicking, armchair psychology, and absolutely baseless speculating must be saged and kept under control. Endless tinfoiling about e.g. Taylor's or Dakota's income or specific shade of hair color must stop and will be punished.
- Hellweek starts tomorrow. This means strict moderation and lots of temporary bans.
- For example, all posts that only consist of "hi [cow]" or "lol" or "underrated post" will be removed and punished with a short ban.
- Taking bait is now a bannable offense unless saged and kept to minimal interaction.
- The Chatango box, although requested as an alternative to Discord, seems unpopular and has been voted to be removed.
- Incel threads will be banned until farmers learn not to lure them to lolcow by attentionwhoring in their communities.
- Zero tolerance for male posters who identify themselves in their posts or otherwise fail to fly under the radar.
- Ember's thread will be put on autosage. You can keep posting in it, but don't make a new one.
- /sty/ and /cream/ will be removed.


Feel free to make further suggestions or post your feedback on any of the above.

No. 4266

>Posting new threads to /snow/ will be aided by a new post form (pic related)
>pic related
Thanks, that form's very, uh… illustrative.

Jokes aside, good job, and good luck to the new staff.

No. 4267

File: 1496805707283.jpg (27.85 KB, 480x360, IMG_1248.JPG)

>>4265
>- Incel threads will be banned until farmers learn not to lure them to lolcow by attentionwhoring in their communities.

but that wasn't even us

No. 4268

aww, isn't there usually a silly/dumb gif or something during hellweek? i was exited about that…

No. 4269

>lie about your admin leaving
>get mad at your mods for doing their job and demote them all
>get mad at your mods for not doing their job and fire them all
>start changing random things in hopes it appeases people
>site splintering

bail sailor, bail bail bail
brace yourself, brace yourself for twelve
all hands on, all hands on deck

No. 4270

>Zero tolerance for male posters who identify themselves in their posts or otherwise fail to fly under the radar.

Why?

No. 4271

>>4270
because admin thinks this site is wizardchan with tits

No. 4272

I sometimes post hi "cow" as responds, as well as reply to bait. never really thought of it against the rules. I won't anymore, but will I be banned for past transgressions?

No. 4273

Exactly who cares if guys are posting again?

Though I do look forward to the dwindling population after this Hellweek comes into effect when people get pissed off. I'm sure the prior mods already are.
Excellent work, Admin.

No. 4274

>>4265
>Race and trans wank will be reduced to one thread each in /ot/ which will be put on autosage.

Thank fuck, only two shit threads to ignore at any given time!

>>4267
Also this.
There's a long history of r9k/MRA style raids, if incels are now discovering us too I don't see why that's our faults.

No. 4275

>Zero tolerance for male posters who identify themselves in their posts or otherwise fail to fly under the radar.

Besides this, I've got no problems with the new rules. Male posters can be quality posters too. That being said, if it's clearly attention whoring then go ahead and get em.

No. 4276

>>4275
I think /sty/ would disagree with you. If guys want to post here they still can, it's just now they can't fall back on the 'you're all hostile because I have a dick' excuse when they engaged in an argument with anons

No. 4277

>>4275
They can be quality posters, but there's no good reason for them to identify themselves as male when posting.

Look more carefully at the wording, it's basically a 'shut up about your dick' rule, and that's good.

No. 4278

>>4277
I'll agree with you on that. But say for example a vocaroo thread pops up, people are having a grand time from both genders, a mod could just come in and ban every single dude poster. Some cases require one to state their gender, it'd be unfair to ban them for that.

No. 4279

>>4276
It's a stupid copout to rely on gender to defend yourself. But again, if it's blatant whoring then the fag gets banned. I think we need a distinction between men who whore and men who just want to enjoy some quality posting, and accidentally are outed as a man.

No. 4280

>>4270
because almost every post starting with "guy here," ends with "I don't know why you ladies are so bitter. I'd fuck her."

No. 4281

>>4265
Absolutely love every single thing about this, looking forward to see our community and board culture return to normal. Good job admin, and good job farmers who participated in town hall.

No. 4282

>>4273
>>4275

"muh dick"- posts is what admin refers to.
We had incels and r9k leaking over and posting their fat fetishes about Mariah and a few other cows.

There's really no need for someones sexual fantasies or guys rating a cows fuckability in gossip threads.

No. 4283

>>4274
>if incels are now discovering us too I don't see why that's our faults.

Different anon, but I agree. Also, the sub is so milky right now.

No. 4284

>>4282
As long as the distinction is made and the mods abide by it I'm happy.

No. 4285

>>4284
We'll make that distinction. This rule is for users who only post to spread their thirst. Vocaroo threads and such should be fine.

No. 4286

>Proposed: In times of zero milk, when a thread is mostly speculation, it could be put on autosage until a moderator undoes this when there's fresh drama.

I like this idea A LOT.

No. 4287

Is it possible to consider new threads to /pt/? I'm tired of seeing the same five people on the front page, while /snow/ moves a pretty rate with the first 3-4 pages being somewhat active.

I suppose it doesn't matter too much, but it would be fun to get some new meat on /pt/

No. 4288

>Proposed: In times of zero milk, when a thread is mostly speculation, it could be put on autosage until a moderator undoes this when there's fresh drama.
>Nitpicking, armchair psychology, and absolutely baseless speculating must be saged and kept under control. Endless tinfoiling about e.g. Taylor's or Dakota's income or specific shade of hair color must stop and will be punished.

Woah but most of snow threads consist of nitpicking due to lack of milk lol what exactly does admin envision for that board (i.e Jvlogger thread, Jill thread, Weeb/youtuber threads). I'm all for stricter moderation honestly but I was also under the impression that /snow/ was made for low-tier threads to minimize poor quality milk in /pt/?

No. 4289

>>4288
Still, 40 + posts of "no she isn't blonde" "YES SHE IS" get's so old, so fucking fast. Back in the day this place was super slow, a lot slower than now, but at least then it was a lot more enjoyable to read.

No. 4291

>>4287
Yes, please report any thread you find /pt/-worthy and if staff agrees, they'll move it.

>>4288
This is true but overall post quality has gone down and /snow/ doesn't need posts like >>4289 bumped on the front page all the time. Autosaging these threads as long as they only go in circles allows users to see other interesting threads more easily. Farmers can make a report when it's time to bump the thread again.

No. 4292

File: 1496846898694.png (18.35 KB, 500x376, fJe2X9Q.png)

>>4266
>posting /meta/ threads at 4 am

Sorry, here's the form.

No. 4294

>>4265
I agree with most of it, but
>- Nitpicking, armchair psychology, and absolutely baseless speculating must be saged and kept under control.
>- Endless tinfoiling about e.g. Taylor's or Dakota's income or specific shade of hair color must stop and will be punished.
>- For example, all posts that only consist of "hi [cow]" or "lol" or "underrated post" will be removed and punished with a short ban.
>- Taking bait is now a bannable offense unless saged and kept to minimal interaction.
please dont become like pull. I love lolcow because it is mostly anarchistic. It takes away a lot of the fun if mods/admin decide what people are allowed to post or not.
I agree although that all of these should be saged.

Can we also be more strict about namefagging and anons that put their real emailadress in?

No. 4296

> - Posting new threads on /pt/ will be restricted to staff members. For thread continuations, a warning will be posted once a thread has reached 1100 posts (100 posts before bump limit).

May I ask; why only staff members can create new threads only (on /pt/)? I personally don't have a problem with it, just curious!

No. 4297

>>4296
I think because newfags kept making threads on PT and they kept having to be moved to snow.

It's annoying and clogs up the catalog.

No. 4298

>>4294
This.
Most of these new ideas are fine, in my experience lolcow has some of the best mods out there. I'm really glad male posters who proclaim their gender are getting kicked out (in no way do I want this to become female wizardchan but plain attentionwhoring, no matter what gender, needs to go).
However if you're going to keep stuff like armchair psychology and nitpicks "under control" it takes away some of the freedom and under control is also a very subjective term.
I agree these should be saged though.

No. 4299

>>4297

Ah I see, I'm gonna miss making new Onion threads for everyone; they were the only threads I was good at whenever I had the the chance to. Oh well

No. 4301

>>4299
You can submit your summaries and OP pics for staff to use, or you can request to be added to moderate and make new onision threads. Please send in a farmhand application if you're interested.

No. 4302

Will the /cream/ and /sty/ boards be deleted completely, or will they be archived and accessible with a direct link.

No. 4303

Can hellweek just be permanent? The first one was top notch but once it was over shit flooded back in. Same thing with each hellweek that followed. IDC if we end up with cow-specific rules, like saging all Ember posts, keeping PT under lock eyc if it means fewer newfags.

If I may make a request, can there be a warning or ban or something for 'how is she still alive!?/we should help!' Posts in Ashley Isaacs threads?

No. 4305

>>4298
Yep, some threads just lend themselves to a bit of armchair (like Onion regarding his general behaviour) and it can add to the fun. Same with a little bit of nitpicking, though that can go too far (ie the distinction between light brown and dark blonde.)
But yes it should be saged as it is speculation or plain gossip and not milk.

No. 4306

>Incel threads will be banned until farmers learn not to lure them to lolcow by attentionwhoring in their communities
Noooo please.

>>4283
This. Since a lot of farmers love those threads, what we can do specifically?

No. 4307

>>4269
A+ for reference

sad about the incel threads though, they came here of their own accord, no one tipped them

No. 4308

>>4301

Okay, thanks so much admin-sama! Where would I sign up to become a farmhand by any chance? Is it too late already?

No. 4309

>>4272
admin said in townhall it only applies to posts from here on out

"hi cow" and replying to bait falls under low quality posting so dont do that

No. 4310

>>4308
Second thread in meta, good idea to lurk before applying as staff.

No. 4311

>>4310

Thanks, I finally got to sign up!

No. 4313

>>4265
I love this and sorry I was too jaded to attend what sounds like a productive town hall. Will the new wave of namefaggers, post-titlers and those unable to sage despite getting help be subject to hellweek rules also? I hope so. Here's to (another) new era at lolcow.

No. 4314

>>4294
I agree. I know its hellweek, but the best part about chan culture is the fact that most of the time its a free for all. I don't expect there to be no rules, but this is insane.

And honestly the amount of what you expect to be saged is also ridic imo. Its a chan board, threads get bumped. I understand stuff like OT comments or "hi momo" posts should be since they really do add to nothing. Or even when farmers are arguing over something dumb as fuck, but saging stuff like an actual reasonable convo about a cow is silly. Thats my fav part about watching the cows, is actually discussing them with people

No. 4315

>>4314
It's most likely just temporary, not permanent, to thin out the cunts that don't want to read the rules and to change the tone of the site a bit.

No. 4316

Can we still have a misandry thread?

No. 4317

It seems like this will fix a lot of the major problems, I'm impressed! Nice work, staff.

No. 4318

I agree with everything. /sty/ didn't bother me, I considered it a sort of containment board for "dangerous" threads, but eh. When I first arrived here there were only /pt/ and /b/, so it's not like we'll miss that board.
Sad for incel threads though, they were pretty fun to read.
>Proposed: In times of zero milk, when a thread is mostly speculation, it could be put on autosage until a moderator undoes this when there's fresh drama.
>Nitpicking, armchair psychology, and absolutely baseless speculating must be saged and kept under control. Endless tinfoiling about e.g. Taylor's or Dakota's income or specific shade of hair color must stop and will be punished.
Yes. I would've considered locking the worst no-milk offenders, like Dakota's thread, but autosaging is even better.
Bans for excessive tinfoiling and nitpicking are gonna be good. My report button is ready.

No. 4319

>>4288
>>4294
>Woah but most of snow threads consist of nitpicking due to lack of milk
>I love lolcow because it is mostly anarchistic.
9/10 times, methinks it's considered shitposting or sometimes veers into A-Logging.

No. 4320

>>4319
>>4294
Anonymous imageboards are sorta anarchistic by default. But the same anarchy will have totally different manifestation depending on the user group present. It's not an issue of the system, it's an issue of its constituents.

Anarchy among special needs preschoolers from South Carolina is not the same thing as anarchy among post-doctorate scientists at CERN. Anarchy among a group consisting of both of the above is a guaranteed shitfest.

Thus in order for a social network of this kind to survive and thrive, you need to carefully select the user base you're striving to cater to. And I personally think the admins and mods made a good choice.

No. 4321

>>4320
Perfectly put.

No. 4322

>>4320
Good point. Even though there aren't that many restrictions, admins and mods keeping the environment under control is a good call.

No. 4323

>>4320
In that case let's ban every thread involving a cow who's primarily posted here for having an ED. Ana-chans bleed into every single other thread derailing with their weight nitpicks, it's honestly the least tolerable trait of lolcow in general. They ruin every discussion, even in times of good milk.

No. 4324

I was kind of iffy about Admin-sama's choices when she first started, but this change is very much welcome. We've needed better moderation and cracking down on low quality posts, bait, and male attention whoring. Sad I missed the town hall meeting, but it seems like a lot of quality stuff was taken care of.

No. 4325

>Ember's thread will be put on autosage. You can keep posting in it, but don't make a new one.

God bless.

No. 4326

What happened earlier? original admin had a twitter for maintenance and general info when the site went down, that was neat. would you consider something similar?

No. 4327

>>4326
I second this

No. 4328

I'm gonna also express sadness about the incel threads; I don't really think what happened was the posters' faults. I really enjoyed them, esp since kiwi doesn't have its loveshy therapy board anymore. I'd love if they could be brought back.

No. 4329

>>4302
/sty/ is still accessible if you go to the URL, but I have no idea if it's going to stick around.

Considering /sty/ just devolves into outright bitter back and forth shit flinging all the time, I would honestly prefer if they just nuked it

No. 4330

I'll just leave this here for the admin, mods, and most dedicated users to read, because I've grown to kind of care for the future of this site:

http://www.shirky.com/writings/herecomeseverybody/group_enemy.html

Shirky is a web pioneer and visionary (and a legend in my generation), and his insights are even more valuable today then they were back then.

Not all of the article is applicable to lolcow, of course, but this website is at a specific point where it could make good use of his observations. So there.

No. 4331

I'll miss the chatango box but good job on everything else staff and farmhands! I'm sure all of this isn't easy and I just want to thank you for your hard work.

Keep up the good job!

No. 4332

>>4328
Same! I have been lurking them, and we missed the return of the catfish!

No. 4333

>>4330

That was actually a really interesting read. Thanks!

No. 4334

I forgot to ask during the townhall but would it be possible to allow us to directly upload videos here instead of having to use an outside source?

No. 4335

>>4334
that would require too much web space and power and I don't think lolcow can support that unless we get funding from ads or something

No. 4339

File: 1497402925221.png (31.24 KB, 1022x271, DnAwPtC.png)

>>4334
sadly >>4335 is true. Once we've dealt with the current more pressing issues of lolcow, we could consider a bigger server and maybe a way for users to help defray the cost. PULL has a Patreon account for this, and a few dollars a month make a difference. Though as I said, I'd leave this for until lolcow is great again.


Updates:
- sticky thread has been added to /snow/ and /pt/ until I'm done with the new thread form.
- our new automod will post warnings when threads reach 1100 posts and again when they're full. (pic related)

Some people are concerned about the autosaging of threads like Dakota's and the possibility of cows (hi Kiki) sabotaging them. For now I'd like to point out that the placement on the board is not relevant for search engines - threads will still place on Google results like before, we'll just have a cleaner board.
I'd like to listen to more input on this and the incels and anything else you can think of before I do a survey to get a good idea of what users want to see.

No. 4342

I'm sorry if this has been answered before, but would it be possible to add the feature that shows how many unique posters are in a thread? 4chan has it and I find it really useful as it can pretty much indicate samefagging if there are a high amount of posts but not a lot of posters. this could also alleviate the "there's only 3 salty bitches in this thread gtfo"

No. 4343

>>4339
>until lolcow is great again.
I'm impressed that this is your goal. Let's make it happen!

No. 4345

>>4339

i'm really glad you guys raised the age for having a thread from 16 to 18. 2 years are not that big of a difference but at least now the cows will be legal adults.

No. 4346

File: 1497473277164.png (367.4 KB, 640x1136, IMG_8197.PNG)

Just wondering, but is it now a bannable offense to post reaction images in response to certain posts? This was in the momokun thread. I just don't really get the logic behind it.

No. 4347

>>4346
Note that your screenshot shows that post wasn't saged. That entire thread is full of people who seem to not know what sage is.

It looks like quite a few people posted unsaged reaction images with no text response. aka no contribution. I dunno why some weren't put out to pasture as well, however, since almost none of them saged.

Also it's hellweek. If people can't be assed to read that header or learn basic posting etiquette, it tends to show.
People should really scroll up in that thread. A farmhand posted and people continued to do what they were told not to, and a lot of people got put out to pasture for that (jnigs discussion, unsaged appearance nitpicking, no-contribution posts that weren't saged, etc).

I feel like the Moomoo thread attracts a lot more new farmers than, say, the Onision thread where people sage heavily. Posts like that build up and turn the thread to shit. People can learn to integrate on their own, or they can learn the hard way if they're too lazy to read the rules or what hellweek entails.

Sorry if I'm wrong on any of this and I definitely don't intend to speak for any staff. Just my observations as a farmer who frequents several cows - the Moomoo thread sticks out with the lack of sage and ignoring posts by farmhands.

No. 4348

>>4347
You're not a mod so I'm not really going to take your post as law, but just in contention of what you're saying– have you ever been on another chan-type image board before? I've never seen posting a reaction image to a picture/video/etc. be a bannable defense. It's a pretty common thing to do and doesn't need to be saged. I guess it's not really "contributing", but it's not like it's derailing the thread. I just don't get it because banning something like this goes so far against board culture. I understand how you're trying out justify it: it's hellweek, not contributing, not an important post, it's a thread that attracts a lot of newfags etc., but none of those reasons, to me, explain why posting reaction images is bannable. It's literally what people do on imageboards. That's why it's called an image board.

No. 4349

>>4348
NTAYT but consider that this user may be a repeat offender who happened to post unsaged noncontribution many times. This post might have been the final straw, only mods known.
And lolcow isn't a typical image board. It has so many rules that go against chan culture because otherwise the subject manner would make it unusable.

No. 4350

>>4349
Exactly my thoughts in writing >>4347 sorry it wasn't clear, and yeah, I tried to disclaimer that I'm not staff and can't speak for them, only what I've seen/read from them and the rules.

No. 4351

why is there so much tolerance and handholding being shown for people who can't sage or reply? I thought this was Hellweek?

No. 4352

>>4346
>>4347
>>4348
>>4349
>>4350
The Momo thread is full of unsaged reaction images. It's the equivalent of bumping a thread just to say "LOL". Just sage and you're fine.

>>4351
It depends on post history of the involved users, among other things. If we can tell that a user is trying to contribute, especially if it's unknown information, they get a warning before we alienate them with a ban.

No. 4353

What's the justification for banning ED/ana/mia threads?

No. 4354

>>4353
It historically attracts Anachans who end up taking over other threads with insane nitpicking and regurgitating how fat everyone is. Also, being spoopy isn't milk and we don't need threads just to count ribs. If the person has drama outside of being ana/mia, for example scamming or big public falling outs, it's okay to post about them.

No. 4356

admin there is someone in the LoLwhore and lilypichu threads fabricating "milk". I want there to milk of these cows, but making shit up by grabbing a picture of some random person and labeling it before/after make up is a huge false step.

These threads haven't been updated in months and suddenly they are constantly updated but with nitpicking about "ew shes ugly" "she she used to look better before x y z" "hey bf doesnt think of her when they fuck kek"

Literally who fucking cares about this circle jerk, where is the drama??? this LoL sperg clearly gets off on pushing these girls down a peg in a nonproductive way. Can't they understand that it actually puts the snowflakes in a good light? Can you please educate that sperg.

No. 4357

Why was Shayna (dumdolly) thread deleted?

No. 4358

For threads that autosage before limit due to "no milk," can we get a farmhand/admin post stating that's the case to avoid duplicate threads?

No. 4359

>>4357
I'd like to know this as well. I don't think it was breaking any of the rules?

No. 4360

>>4357
Seconding. Also her previous threads are gone too?

No. 4361

>>4357
thirding. I wish we would have received a notification or justification as to why all of her threads were removed.

No. 4362

>>4357
>>4359
>>4360
>>4361
Unfortunately, this is out of our hands and we are unable to comment on the matter at this time.

No. 4363

>>4362
admin, I am >>4361 . I appreciate your response and understand.

No. 4367

Since it's hellweek, can we remove one of the instagram/social media threads? I know I'm anal retentive with keeping the off topic boards tidy, but I don't understand why the latest duplicate was left up

No. 4368

File: 1498009375870.jpg (27.63 KB, 493x495, thisbitch.jpg)

Can you please ban the robot that has been shitting up /ot/ and /g/ the past day?

No. 4369

can the anisa/cancer crew thread be taken off autosage? it's getting pretty milky

No. 4372

I've been working on rewriting the rules page with help from staff and many long-time farmers. Some rules were added or changed. Please read them here and let me know what you think so I can adjust them before they are made official.
https://lolcow.farm/rules3.html

Relevant changes:
> Minors can be posted about as long as they're 16+ and their full legal name isn't mentioned. First names are okay.
> Doxxing is no longer allowed.
I know some people will disagree with this, but please consider that we never allowed or encouraged cowtipping anyway, so the information gives cows and unintegrated users ammo and invite vendettachans without being of much value to threads. Most of it can be found online anyway.
> Absolutely no more posting of family members.

I also added a newfriend guide to help integrate users:
https://lolcow.farm/newf.html

Thank you in advance for any feedback.

>>4369
I will check now.

>>4368
He's gone.

No. 4373

File: 1498086961461.png (132.29 KB, 808x229, 1ORZvj3.png)

>>4372
>>4369
Yes, this thread is a goldmine of quality content.
I've tempbanned a bunch of users who use the thread like a chatroom. If the nitpicking and spamming eases up now, I will unsage.

No. 4374

>>4372

Generally, I agree with these changes. These are good changes.

I have a few questions, for clarification purposes:

> Minors can be posted about as long as they're 16+ and their full legal name isn't mentioned. First names are okay.

> Absolutely no more posting of family members.

Does this mean "Cows who are under 16 are off limits"? Or does it mean, for example, that the 14 year old sibling of the cow is off limits?

If the latter, does mentioning the cow's "sister and baby niece" violate the rule?

What about pictures of sub-16-year olds? (ie, the cow and their young sibling?)

> Doxxing is no longer allowed.


Thank you. I've seen some threads where people take this to mean "No one is allowed any privacy. I will violate the cow's sister's boyfriend's sister as a result!"

>I also added a newfriend guide to help integrate users:


Nice! Useful!

May I suggest some terminology or a glossary or whatever of some 'important' slang? like what cowtipping is (and that it's against the rules) or what samefagging is, etc.

Also! I notice that it reads, under point 3:

> If you upload anything nsfw or gory,


while the rules say:

> Do not post images of human or animal gore.

No. 4375

>>4374
>Also! I notice that it reads, under point 3:
>If you upload anything nsfw or gory,
> while the rules say:
>Do not post images of human or animal gore.

I think you're looking at the "old" rules page (the one currently active). The new rules are here:
https://lolcow.farm/rules3.html

In any case, I will add spoilers to the rules, thank you.

No. 4376

>>4372

This looks good. refreshing to see the over all consensus being added to the official rules of the board.

>>4373
the autosaging of the filthy thread has cleaned out a lot of trash posters, bumping it is counterproductive, so thanks for not doing that.

No. 4377

>>4374
Sounds good!

No. 4380

>>4348
honestly, lolcow gets way too wanky about saging. i see posts who don't get saged banned but the 3+ posts calling said person to sage not to be banned which is just triple shit posting (even if they're saged)

I don't understand the hard on for saging tbh. Sometimes its warranted, like if it goes Offtopic/ blogging, but its ridiculous to get banned because you don't sage a reaction image… which is the whole point of image boards

No. 4381

>>4380
an unfunny reaction image is often worse and more offtopic than even a blogpost

No. 4383

>>4277
There is never a good reason to identify yourself on an anonymous board. Anyone who does so is clearly far from their home.

It's great to see mods taking their job seriously. Good luck.

No. 4393

>>4372
I'm assuming this is why the shay gnarr thread was deleted? Can we make a new one that focuses solely on her?

No. 4394

>>4391
Okay, you can make a new incel thread.

>>4393
>Can we make a new one that focuses solely on her?
No.

No. 4466

>>4280
"So lesbian here I don't know why you ladies are so bitter, I'd lick her"

is okay?

No. 4467

Just wanted to say thanks for your efforts, farmhands. I started checking in on lolcow less in recent months but I'm glad to see things are improving. <3 saged because not a specific question or contribution

>>4466
Unless you can provide proof that these posts actually happen (and if they do now it's probably just you) I'm just gonna assume you're a butthurt male.

If somehow, you're not, then I'll explain; the problem is that we had a significant number of male posters male-posting (aka "why u so salty I'd fuck her xd") and thus it became a problem.

No. 4468

>>4467
Admittedly a male but I don't want to ruin your lulz.

Mostly just curious on the reason for the rules.

I'll respectfully lurk.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 4495

>>4271
this place IS wizardchan with tits tho

No. 4510

>>4495

This thread:
>>>/ot/40826

Prove that it's not even remotely comparable to wizardchan.

No. 4511

I know I'm late, but why was /sty/ ahem…manure removed?
I don't give a shit about /cream/
Just wondering, it was kinda fun having /sty/; like the trash bin of threads to lul at.
It was like a rekt section of funny failed threads.
Will it ever come back or is this permanent?
Where will threads go when they die? If a thread dies, but it's not in /sty/ for anyone to see, did it really die?

>the world may never know

No. 4549

>>4511

/Sty/ was a goddamn mistake and now it's gone. Shit threads are rightfully deleted forever now.

No. 4554

>>4511
It's technically still there, and usable

lolcow.farm/sty/

No. 4557

Can we get Kelly's posts tagged, like with mystery, spergchan, etc?

No. 4558

>>4557

seconded

No. 8145




Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]