[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site is back! Read about the how and why we were offline here

File: 1587014040857.jpg (294.7 KB, 1280x1030, cow-1544320_1280.jpg)

No. 14594

Please post all general issues and complaints here. If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.
>>>/meta/6821 should only be used for technical issues and suggestions (can't load site, site slow, bugs, site feature requests). This thread is for non-technical issues.
Do not use this thread to infight and instigate pointless arguments.

No. 14595

I’ve posted here before to complain about the ‘hi scrote/hi tranny’ derailing - I just wanted to say I notice the increase of moderation on this, and I think it improved the problem a lot. Thanks!

No. 14596

>>14594
Could someone take a look at the current pro ana thread?
There‘s a cow shitting up the thread with her woe is me-pity party and a bunch of people triggering even more of it by interacting with her.

No. 14597

File: 1587049965111.jpg (59.94 KB, 500x375, janny.jpg)

>she's a janitor
>on a lolcow imageboard
>she does it for free
>this is what she does during quarantine

No. 14599

>>14595
If by "improve" you mean we now have obvious trannies and men posting then yeah sure, it "improved" the problem. Don't forget to dialate, hun!

No. 14602

>>14599
I mean if you think that’s true why would moderating ‘hi scrote/hi tranny’ be the reason for it? It’s not like saying ‘hi scrote’ used to stop them being able to post or anything it just derails conversation, just report them if anyone’s actually breaking a rule?

No. 14603

File: 1587207944342.jpeg (51.26 KB, 652x228, 86F965DB-D175-4C86-826B-847FF0…)

>>/pt/769627

Vicky’s back, and now she’s convinced lolcow can be charged with manslaughter for… what? Posting a picture of a girl who apparently attempted suicide AFTER Vicky commented on it? Idk.

Can we get her posts verified?

No. 14604

>>14597
What is this in reference to?

No. 14607

would mods be willing to temporarily lock or at least autosage the lilith levisis thread?
someone keeps derailing and it does not appear as though they plan on stopping. the milk has been dry for weeks aside from one of her friends posting in-thread and that anon getting repeatedly banned. it's really annoying.

No. 14608

>>14607
who the fuck even reads that thread. just hide it.

No. 14609

>>14608
anon you replied to

i started following her because of heroingranola.. it's interesting to see how everyone she's [holli] associated with ends up turning into a drug addicted criminal.
but god, 75% (at least) of the people who post there are completely insufferable.

No. 14610

what was the chat.lolcow.farm thing about yesterday lol
Links to /cream and /manure were briefly added as well. Old website copy or what?

No. 14611

>>14594
Please lock or autosage Alicia's thread in /snow/, it's her sneaking in under tons of socks and redditors complaining.

No. 14612

if i get banned one more time i swear im putting down my dog.

No. 14613

>>14612
What was the ban? Can you share a screenshot and block out the IP so we can see if its bs? A lot of anons have been sharing because of confusion with rules. You could always try appealing.

No. 14614

>>14612
What kind of dog?

No. 14615

>>14613
the ban was appropriate, i just don't want the rules to be applied to me

>>14614
a female rottweiler

No. 14616


No. 14617

>>14615
I stan

No. 14618

>>14594
Testing to see if I am still banned.

No. 14619

Lmao I'd hate to be a farmhand and have to wade through 700+ posts of spam in /m/, koreaboos are stupid as hell.

No. 14620

I just got someone elses ban from like 2019, i'm on Opera, I just started using Opera with a VPN so I don't know if I just lucked out or what.
It was a ban for race bait

No. 14621

>>14620
We recommend not using banned proxies like Opera VPN if you'd prefer to not get randomly banned.

No. 14622

>>14621
oh okay thanks, I'll go back to my chrome browser

No. 14623

File: 1587571560016.jpg (70.86 KB, 1080x287, Screenshot_20200422-090012_Sam…)

The banned vendetta-chan is back up hopping in the nicole thread. Necro'd then posted nitpicking and ended hi cow. Can we please get this shit thread locked and force these anons back to the thot thread? There is nothing about this nicole davis girl at all that has anything with milk in the thread anyway . Its just nitpick and still vendetta. The same person bumps it every few days with photos trying to bait nitpicking and say its milk. Every 10 posts feels like its 'hi cow'. >>>/w/89520

No. 14624

Good call locking up the kpop thread, the sudden surge of twitterfags was so weird and out of control. I wonder if there was actually a huge number of new posters, or if it was a bunch of samefags posting in there all day long

No. 14625

>>14624
The vast majority appeared to be new, with a handful of the frequent spergs mixed in. It'll remain locked until we discuss what to do with it next with Admin-sama.

No. 14626

>>14625
already reported bitching bleeding into the idol spam thread.

No. 14627

>>14625
Thank you, oh my god. The thread shit the second after the merge I was wondering when you all would shut it all down.

No. 14629

File: 1587595302227.png (339.68 KB, 1267x557, vendettachan.png)

>>14623
So vendetta chan got banned for the 'hi cow' and then proceeded to admit to posting old photos with the debunked already nose job 'milk' and is doing the same M/O of forgetting the captions and deleting the posts and reposting after spamming. This anon is so fucking annoying. I understand not liking this chick but this level of stupid with begging for nitpicking to be milk in so embarrassing in the thread at this point.
>>>/w/89606
>>>/w/89604

No. 14630

>>14629
I dont know if the mods can tell but they do this every time they get banned multiple times without arguing about it. They go on a photo drop.

No. 14632

>>14630
>>14629
its funny how nicole chan anons flood meta the second some1 says anything about nicole isnt there something better to do than constantly hovering over nicole's thread mass reporting and reeing on meta?

No. 14633

>>14632
How would you know there are mass reports unless its you who keeps getting banned?

No. 14634

Can someone please come get that kisame schizo who is shitting up /snow/

No. 14636

>>14634
You guys might want to get onto dealing with the sperg faster because now they are posting gross unspoilered hentai.

No. 14637

File: 1587686689326.jpeg (442.87 KB, 1242x2075, 57EDA9B2-7CDF-44D2-8A7D-F666A1…)

Got another ban for “ban evading” even though it’s not my post, again. I’ve never even been banned to begin with, nor have I posted in onion threads since 2019. I know it’s just the stupid IP-cycling that’s giving me someone else’s ban, again. But it still butthurts my fee-fees and rustles muh jimmies. I need a hug.

No. 14638

>>14637
you seem like someone who get banned. t b h.

No. 14639

So what’s up with the Alicia / jixypixy thread? It’s a huge confusing mess, it seems like she is bumping her own thread with nonsense daily. At least she only posts in her own thread, hilariously enough. Do we just let her go and not report her posts or…?

No. 14640

Why are IPs from Opera VPN banned?

No. 14641

>>14640
because ham-chan used them all

No. 14642

>>14641
same with hola free it seems.

No. 14643

>>14637
If this happens more than once to you i doubt its cycling and you wanting to blane it on that. I see an increase in anons complaining that its not their IP

No. 14644

There seems to be people posting screenshots of people from twitter or tumblr and then telling them they were posted here? This has happened twice is the dumbass shit thread the past couple of days. Idk if anything can be done or if this actually breaks any rules but drawing K-pop twitter stans and random tumblr users here seems like a bad idea

No. 14645

>>14643
It’s the 5th time since 2015, so not that deep. Most of the posts are from threads I don’t use. A bunch of anons had it happen to them about a year or 2 ago and it was discussed in meta. One said it was due to “the IP’s being recycled”. So everyone was like …kay?

1 ban was for a post saying “I’m 13”. 1 ban for a post saying “as a male”. 1 ban for “hi cow!”. And 1 ban which was meant for a cow who was obviously selfposting and ban evading in the onion threads. Now this one.

I didn’t write any of the posts, nor am I underage, male, onision cowfriend, etc.

No. 14646

>>14644
That's cowtipping isn't it?

No. 14647

>>14645
do you really remember this random stuff since 2015 until now?

No. 14648

>>>/snow/964537

Can mods do something about this thread, I've been trying to read more about this cow but the namefagging, doxing and weird posts are annoying. I have already reported some of the posts.

No. 14649

>>14647
Unfortunately.

No. 14650

Can you guys bring back K-pop critical?
The Twitter stans should be gone and I love being able to discuss kpop with no bias.

No. 14651

>>14650
kpop critical was filled with covert twitter stans anyway. that thread has been pure cancer for a long time

No. 14652

>>14651
Damn, I guess that’s that…why can’t the twitter kids behave

No. 14653

>>14650
K-pop critical was just the PULL of K-pop general. Instead of discussing actual issues with the industry and the bizarre behavior of the stars people were more interested in nitpicking every k-pop artist they didn't stan and calling them either ugly fatties or faggots. It was cancer.

No. 14654

this is going to be a stupid question but now that it's redtexted, is using 'nonny' going to get me banned? i only post once or twice a week so it doesn't matter if i get a short ban, i'd just like to know so i don't use it again.

No. 14655

>>14654
Nonny has been redtexted for ages and I've used it multiple times without getting banned. Using a redtexted word isn't necessarily going to warrant you a ban.

No. 14656

Are pink pilled/ man hate threads currently banned right now?
I’m having some difficulty finding the new thread.

No. 14657

>>14645
again, from your screenshot it seems like the ban is for you and you sound unhinged as fuck so you probably shouldn't post here anyway.

No. 14658

>>14656
now you know damn well..

No. 14659

>>14657
Seriously. Theres always an anon in here saying they constantly get banned under not their IP. Idk, it seems really really farfetched to say that this anons IP has been mistaken that many times. IPs arentimited in number. I swear more and more banned anons claim its not them.

No. 14660

>>14659
>>14657
Not that anon but why would they post old ass bans if it wasn't from IP cycling?? The one she posted is over a year old.

No. 14661

>>14660
It was from February of this year? The mods have said a million times that using banned proxys or VPN's will get you banned due to IP cycling so why do people keep doing it and posting it here

No. 14662

>>14660
Its the same anon though which is weird. Why so many?

No. 14663

>>14660
>The one she posted is over a year old.
>2/26/20
it's only 2 months old, anon. she probably just got unbanned recently and is trying to claim it wasn't for her so they won't use her post history.

No. 14665

File: 1587764812261.jpeg (965.94 KB, 1204x1729, 9050D4CE-5C5D-4141-BCD6-C6FC5B…)

>>14657
>>14663
Yo anons chill out, it really isn’t that deep. I’m not “unhinged” for complaining about something, don’t be over dramatic. It’s not my post. I haven’t posted in the onion threads since like early 2019. I was gone from Dec-March, so i couldn’t have posted it. You can even check old meta threads if you don’t believe me. I’ve posted the same complaint before with screenshots.

>tell someone where the fuck they can go like a backseat mod

>respond just to be a dick
>complain about a complaint post
>in a complaint thread
>buy a new tinfoil hat
>???
>profit

This whole shit doesn’t even matter bc when I got the ban, it had already expired. It didn’t do anything. I just posted to see if any1 else had it happen, like last time, shit calm down.

>>14661
I’ve never used a VPN on this site, ever.

>>14660
Not a year old. This February. But thank you, I really didn’t think it was such a big deal when I posted this. It’s not like I’m the first anon to say this.

*reposted bc dropped pic (pic from 1 yr ago)

No. 14667

File: 1587765235304.png (116.82 KB, 1052x600, imaging.png)

>>14665
>>14664
I thought the typing style and everything seemed the same as well as the sperging out. Dude, are you the Nicole sperg? No wonder you keep complaining about bans if that is the case. Same typing style and speging in paragraph form.

No. 14668

>>14667
….Nicole sperg? …..what Nicole? What are you talking about? I’ve been gone from this site for months, idk what your talking about? Link? I don’t get why ppl are jumping to vague assumptions.

And idk about your pic, but I reposted bc I forgot to include the sc

No. 14669

>>14667
nta but are you the same anon that comes in here and spergs about the nicole nitpicking all the time? theyre cringe and embarassing but so are you

No. 14670

>>14669
The mods seem to follow through with the bans to the nitpicker and that's kind of what this thread is for.

No. 14671

I'm sure I wasn't the only one but on my laptop I'm still having trouble loading images that are spoilered. The Spoiler image doesn't even load, it's a box. I click it and the image is VERY dull. Mobile does not do this.

No. 14672

>>14671

My laptop seems to be loading all of those fine. Try deleting the site cookies maybe an double checking your internet connect since I know cell connection sometimes works better. Also double check you don't have it already on hide by accident.

No. 14673

>>14672
Shit! The cookie thing worked. Thank you. I thought it was weird because this has never happened before unless my internet connection was bad but today it wasn't.

No. 14674

>>14673
Yeah no prob. I actually had a similar issue with my friend's computer a few days ago, not from lolcow, but another site, which is the only reason why I know.

No. 14675

>>14670
>that's kind of what this thread is for

TFW you lowkey use the thread to accuse random anons of nitpicking nicole bc “they type in paragraphs!!1” (reaching hard af) but can’t even spell “sperging” correctly kek.

No. 14680

What the fuck is up with the constant racebaiting and moralfag spergery in /ot/? Did someone cowtip again and now we have an influx of little Twitter shits everywhere? It's so OTT and stupid that it feels like bait at this point but the amount of work they put into their text walls feels too much of an effort for a simple baiter.

No. 14681

>>14680
What moralfagging? What racebait?
Man admin gives you people the little finger and you take the whole hand.

No. 14682

>>14680
i agree anon. i feel the past two weeks, /ot/ has been really hostile. seems like a lot more anons sperging and taking offense to shit/calling people out

No. 14684

>>14682
I have to agree too and getting mad at being called out makes no sense. We get their argument of this being a shitty gossip site sounds like that makes lolcow a free for all, but dude, we do have some semblance of organization and it's been all kinds of out of whack across the site since this all started, a little bit back in December, but probably because kids were out. Now we have actual cowtippers sending people here through twitter and shit, people posting spoiled milk or fake milk, the neccessant racebaiting and what feels like raids at times and when they get banned they complain that this is just a gossip forum and we take this too seriously. Its like.. The site has rules.

No. 14685

>>14680
There are no radfems and oldfags to keep the "woke" Twitter community away anymore. They've been run off the site. LC is now a trans, kpop, sjw safespace uwu#

No. 14686


No. 14687

File: 1587917231460.jpeg (283.71 KB, 744x904, 9E10A1DC-F603-4465-B4F4-8CC373…)

>short exchange in disagreement with post saying it’s female psychology to be obsessive stalker
>le pp sperg le infighting
>filed 2 days after the fact
Bruh just say it’s personal at this point

No. 14689

>>14685
This! Saw one twitnewfag yell at anons just for writing 3-4+ sentence posts (even receipts/transcripts), misusing the word “sperg” like crazy. Acting like we have twitter character limits here. Another racebaiting twitnewfag triggered over a farmer saying “chill nigga”. Autismo’s posting tweets saying “look at this new site I just found omg come in here! Teaaaaa! You can post whatever u want! [ten emojis]” They treat LC like it’s social media. Cowtipping, not saging, namefagging, not reading rules, shitting up threads to sperg, over-using lame memes to death, OT convos like we’re a chat room, being offended over board culture, being general faggots, driving farmers and oldfags off, etc.

It’s like a bunch of high school SJWs stumbled upon an uncontacted isolted Amazonian tribe, thirsty and hungry. The tribe allows them to stay the night as guests. Gives them fresh ass milk and snacks. Then the next morning the SJWs say “you can’t wear animal skin thongs and smoke tabacco. you have to dye your hair blue and not speak your native language anymore, if you do we will sperg out. Oh and we gonna break all your rules and complain when you uphold them in your own community and kick us out. Hope you don’t mind us posting the gps coordinations on woke Twitter to invite all of our friends to move down here! This is our tribe now too! [pushes tribe elders off cliff] why don’t you like us?! It’s just an ancient tribe! Ugh!”

They need an orientation course on site culture and rules, a containment thread, and/or tranquilizer darts.

No. 14690

>>14687
I liked and miss pp too but that was just asking for derailing.

No. 14691

>>14689
this might be the cringiest analogy i ever read, holy shit.

No. 14692

lolcow has had a very different vibe lately…very twitter-esque. normcore almost

No. 14693

>>14692
what's the usual vibe

No. 14694

>>14692
it's because of covid.

No. 14695

>>14689
It's not that deep, it's just a stupid imageboard and yes anyone can post here.

No. 14696

you should get an australian farmhand

No. 14697

>>14695
Technically no, males and underage girls can’t post here and this site can’t be directly linked from other certain sites/message boards.

>>14694
Prob mix of this and underage girls becoming more into social media drama ie: teen shade room. Not to mention them linking the egirl thread on twitter a million times.

No. 14698

>>14692
What's normcore?

No. 14699

>>14698
a tumblr term for normalfag. i don't understand why people criticizing the shitty corona influx are also pretty new/unwanted demographics.

No. 14700

>>14699
I don't think so anon. Im an oldfag and I see a lot of us trying to actually not call these newfags out but it is frustrating because they canderail for days before a mod steps in and by then the trheads are trashed. This is why so many of us barely come here anymore and why its run rampant my tumblrtards and kpop sjw twitterers.

No. 14701

>>14700
There's just so many of them because there's nothing better for them to do when they're quarantined. The summer of hellfire.

No. 14702

>>14701
Hellfire of kpop, deaming nitpicking milk when called out on it, vendetta postings, trash threads being made, thinking this is drama when it isn't.. just ugh. There is going to be so much low-budget posting. Im going to hate it. I wish I wasn't unemployed right now because I have nothing else to do right now too.

No. 14703

>>14700
that's kind of what i meant. that the only people bitching are also the issue. it's just early summer as far as i am concerned.

No. 14704

There's a person (or more) trolling people in an attempt to regulate the place, and it's cringe. I've been here for 2 years and it wasn't like that.

No. 14705

>>14704
Why post in the thread if you're not going to be precise with your complaint? What are the farmhands supposed to do?

No. 14706

I've really lost faith in staff now, mod decisions have become retarded. A week ago I was banned for posting a public court record of Raven's. This is not dox. Another user put it back up straight away anyway, and there it sits just fine. Sort your shit out, it's gotten embarrassing and really inconsistent here.

No. 14707

>>14706
Can you share a post of the ban page by chance and then relink to the thread post that was reuploaded?

No. 14708

Gross CP thread in /g

No. 14709

Please delete cp in /pt/.
I reported.

No. 14710

Reported the CP in both /pt/ and /g/. Delete it please.

No. 14711

now it's nazi shit, woohoo

No. 14713

is it just me or is the discord link invalid?

No. 14714

>>14713
Looks like you were right, the link will be updated.
>>14696
We have one or two.

No. 14715

would the mods please consider locking or at least autosaging the Alicia Day thread on /snow/? she’s not that milky and the majority of the thread is obviously self posts. i really don’t think we should encourage her or give her the attention she clearly craves.

No. 14716

Some anon is infighing in the Jill thread for 9 hours now.

No. 14717

>>14715
seconding this

No. 14719

>>14717
3rding kek. Make alicias thread go away plz, it’s just a cesspool

No. 14720

can we get a little more regulation on the miranda constable thread? there's anons who keep annoyingly referring to her as a "pedo" because she said she believes the koran 100%, which includes mohammed and the childbride crap. it's not even tinfoil or anything, just annoying shitposting that reads like a samefag signature. if pedo accusations are banned in the moo thread when moo literally admitted to reading loli/underage porn, it should be banned in the miranda thread.

No. 14723

Someone is spamming random pictures in the pull-thread in ot.

No. 14726

>>14725
Did you really need to go into a fit of rage over fucking up your hair, did you need attention so badly? Stop self posting >>>/ot/549245 fuck off and go back to PULL. Oh and fuck your orange patchy haircut.

No. 14731

>>14726
>>14726
Pls learn to cross link. Otherwise it’s good.

No. 14733

>>14726
I will come and see you later, dumb bitch.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 14734

What's up with the sudden influx of people who proudly state that they're underage? I saw 3 today (already banned but nevertheless)

Also, the situation with kpop twitter fags will never change as long as there's a general kpop thread plus one to spam idols pictures. You either have to lock it again (both threads this time) or you could go back to kpop critical…

No. 14735

>>14734
what makes you think changing the name to critical will help though? it still had the same twitterfag stans, but now they feel more comfortable outing themselves. kpc had constant fights of "reeee you're a stan because you dont think this idol looks like a goblin", racebaiting, complaining about south east asia for some reason? same autism, different name. I miss the anti kpop threads but those users left long ago when kpc gradually got taken over by twitterfags

No. 14736

>>14715
Third, I wanted to learn more about this cow and the thread seems like a cesspool of mentally ill transplants from god knows where.

No. 14737

>>14715
I agree (fourth). She deserves an autosage for being such an attention whore in her own threads.
She's terribly boring unfortunately.

No. 14738

>>14734
1. Lockdown gives kids more vacant time to be browsing the internet
2. Kids from twitter were led here by cowtipping
3. K-pop thread was purged momentarily so they started leaking over to other threads
Twitterfags have been trashing the place in the recent weeks and think their retarded woke discourse will fly over here and then go into fits of rage when nonnies tell them to put a sock in it.

No. 14739

Unban the AI anon.

No. 14740

>>14739
No. Stay banned forever. Why are you coming here requesting someone else get unbanned. Ban evading much?

No. 14741

>>14740
Are you genuinely retarded?

No. 14742

>>14740
ntayrt but I don't know why they were banned either. I was interested in the thread

No. 14743

>>14742
probably because they've been ban evading for weeks now and spamming their AI shit in unrelated threads with no context

No. 14744

>>14743
weeks? i thought it was only today. where are the posts at

No. 14745

>>14744
they got deleted pretty quickly but they've been spamming the closeted celebrity thread for a while now. just look for replies that don't link back to a comment in there

No. 14746

Re-open the thread dude. That was a super lame move, even for you.

No. 14748

>>14747
>In Mexico, Germany, Austria the law recognizes that it is basic human nature to escape and hence the act of escaping itself is not a crime.

No. 14749

>>14742
They spammed AI generated faces in several threads, we don't believe it was the same spammer from yesterday in the PULL thread.
Yesterday's spammer is copy pasting random posts and adding spam to it or other random edgy content to declare they're having a mental breakdown.
>>14737
Autosaged for attention seeking.

No. 14750

>>14749
i have some intel for you but the discord link is broken?

No. 14751

well you could just tell me off instead of banning me without explaining why…

No. 14752

>>14750
Discord invite, it will be updated on the top of the page later.
https://discord.gg/vpHgDzX

No. 14753

thanks for running this website and putting time and effort into it, admin. i'm glad it exists even though it probably gave me irreversible brain damage

No. 14754

>>14643

Dunno how this website works but I used to regularly get bans that weren't mine on 4chan before they separated out the blue boards. The blue boards are all I used (hobbies/ adv) but I would get bans for racebaiting and posting gore on /pol/ and /b/

Admittedly I'm a phoneposter, is that a big problem? Aren't most chan posters phoneposters nowadays? Maybe IP or range bans aren't the way to go anymore

No. 14755

>>14754
There is more than just 2 those two ways of banning. They even device ban people which in turn flips the entire site.

No. 14756

>>14754
the OP who was squawking about her bans only posted one ban that seemed like it was clearly for her. usually these kinds of bans are for raid related shitposting and not innocuous slightly derailing thread content.

No. 14757

The ratfems are at it again in the confession thread.

No. 14758

Racebaiting in unpopular opinion thread

Also I love how the second the kpop thread is open people talk about black people again.

Rent free

No. 14759

>>14757
Good for them.

No. 14760

There is too much sperging about trannys in every thread in OT, even when it’s not remotely relevant to the topic of the thread and always results in multiple anons replying derailing things further

No. 14761

>>14760
Bitch, literally where. The only consistent sperging I see about anything on this website is the BPD shit. I swear /ot/ loves to talk about BPDfags for some god-forsaken reason.

No. 14762

Also, I know it's probably hard to keep up with the COVID retardation going on(godspeed, mods) but there are a lot of obviously underaged posters right now. Most likely to reply with "I'm 18" when asked if they're underaged. Christ.

No. 14763

>>14761
whenever someone brings this up you always come straight to lie and say it isn't happening when it is in literally every thread, every day and this isn't even a debatable thing just search tranny or troon or tif or whatever you people say in literally any ot thread, even if you just look at posts made within the last 24 hours it is a ridiculous amount.

No other group would be allowed to just constantly go on and on like this, you have containment threads, a whole containment board and it still happens. It is annoying to see any group (munchies, anachans, robots) constantly post repetitive baity things and this is no different but for some reason is being treated as such and just allowed to go on constantly

No. 14764

>>14759
>>14761

Go back to AsherahGarden or whatever the fuck it is now

No. 14765

>>14764
Anon, I have never sperged about trannies or troons on this website, I just think you guys are beating a dead horse. The threads are already gone and /meta/ is always the same repetitive shit debate about the radfem boogey men.

No. 14766

>>14763
>you have containment threads, a whole containment board

nta but these have been gone quite a while now anon

No. 14767

>>14765
if meta is always the complaining about the same thing thats because the admins and mods have failed to address the problem people aren't just doing it for fun

>>14766
AsherahGarden is their containment board and it's still there

No. 14768


No. 14769


No. 14770

>>14765
Their issue is the simple fact that anons are using the word tranny, troon and tif and for mysterious reasons it bothers them so very much that they have to complain every single thread despite (or maybe because) their demands already got catered to before, in hopes staff will bend over once again and ban anyone who uses those words this time. They went from blaming radfems/pp/gc for absolutely anything to crying about anons calling them a scrot or tranny to now crying about anons even mentioning trannies, all without ever fucking pointing out which exact posts they are talking about. Go figure.

No. 14771

>>14770
Yeah, these types will never be satisfied.

No. 14772

>>14770
It’s not just mentioning trannies but it’s the fact that it’s so often and repetitive and inserted into irrelevant topics. Your logic is stupid like you could use this for any of the past problems the site has had with specific segments of the user base, you could just as easily say ‘oh what’s the problem with anachans why are you angry at them simply mentioning the word fat’ or whatever the problem is when something happens to the extent that it becomes repetitive, derailing and annoying to the majority of users.

Also again with the usual immature paranoia, ‘mysterious reasons everyone who disagrees with me must be an undercover tranny’ bit - it’s not a mysterious reason I’ve said the reason, that it’s excessive and derailing. It is not my job to link the hundreds of posts in each thread, like I’ve said you can search these terms (which is solely why I brought them up as you can clearly see if you read my post in context, not because the words itself bothers me but because it makes it easier to locate the posts I’m talking about if you’re genuinely so curious) and see for yourself or you can just let the mods look into it and allow people to post their complaints in meta without immediately having to jump in demand proof and implying they must be trans as if I owe you a random poster anything

No. 14773

I won't lie I do post about a lot of trans stuff mainly because its getting so big and I have so many interaction with them IRL and online. I will calm it down. I miss 2X.

No. 14775

Why are the farmhands just flat out deleting so many posts lately? like some of them I don't think were even trolls

No. 14776

>>14775
it's easier for them to delete everything than actually do their job

No. 14778

Can anyone do something about the infighting in the lesbian thread. People are crying because they aren't being "inclusive" enough. The lesbian thread was completely quiet until know, now people are trying to start debates instead of talking about relationships. I'm starting to think people want the thread pulled, especially with people crying about "tranny/troon" shit when I have yet to see it in /ot/ myself.

No. 14779

Also, retarded kpop fags made THREE new threads

Please, just ban kpop altogether

No. 14780

>>14779
As if, the farmhands are on our side kek

No. 14781

>>14775
>>14776
Continuously avatarfagging and ban evading to post AI generated faces will be treated as spam and deleted.
>>14778
The thread won't be pulled because a few anons are infighting.
>>14754
>>14755
Bans don't work like this at all. You can phonepost if you like but it may result in a cycled IP. There is no penalty against using TOR or a VPN unless it's being abused. If you are having issues for whatever reason you can always appeal the ban because I can see if it was recursive or inherited.
>>14773
Crystal.cafe and asherahsgarden.net are other alternative communities if you feel that something is lacking here. Support your fellow women-based imageboards.
>>14779
Contrary to popular belief, the k-pop threads were merged because there were too many. They still attract a good amount of twitterfags who exclusively use the site just for kpop and continuously ban evade. For now I would encourage anons to report obvious newfaggotry.

Since summer is approaching it would be a good time to have a townhall to discuss things as a community, last time I had a flu so we just ended up having hellweek scheduled. I would like for as many anons to be able to come so date or time suggestions would be helpful. We can discuss summerfags and other persisting issues showcased in this thread.

No. 14784

>>14772
Not going to engage further in this, because it would just go in circles like every other thread so far with them repeating the same thing next thread anyway regardless of what others say.

>repetitive and inserted into irrelevant topics

Not my post, but this >>14761 . It has been said already a thousand of times by different people and every time the answer is "believe me it's just everywhere, you're just lying" yet you persistently deny linking one or two example posts of what you're talking about. Why is this so hard to do that if it's such a huge issue? Nevermind it would help farmhands tackle specific posts so they actually know what you're talking about and don't just ban people for vaguely mentioning troons. Or you know, just using the report function if they actually break rules.
>you could use this for any of the past problems the site has had with specific segments of the user base, you could just as easily say ‘oh what’s the problem with anachans why are you angry at them simply mentioning the word fat’
Idk, there is a lot of weight discussion, diet discussion and talking about eating disorders on /ot/ and endless posts of calling average sized cows hamplanets, yet I don't see you sperging about that here. I also don't remember anyone still going on and on about seeing anas everywhere months after the time their thread got closed and accusing any post about weight to be from anas.
>when something happens to the extent that it becomes repetitive, derailing and annoying to the majority of users.
The absolute irony and lack of self-awareness. Also I'm sure the Supernatural Powers thread would be delighted to hear about your ability to read every anon's mind and speak for them. Or you could go on keep ignoring the polls outing you as a loud minority.
>that it’s excessive and derailing. It is not my job to link the hundreds of posts in each thread, like I’ve said you can search these terms
That's weird, because I did and the results don't show what you claim.
>Unpopular Opinion Thread(219 posts): Tranny: 3 posts - two of them from anons who are complaining about radfems and brought trannys up in the first place ; Troon: 0 ; TiF: 0
>Vent Thread(1037 posts): Tranny: 9 - all discussing a new game involving a trans character ; Troon: 8 - with 5 about the game and 3 isolated vents involving them ; TiF: 1 - anon venting about one in her friend group
>Dumbass Shit Thread(1209 posts): Tranny: 3 ; Troon: 3 ; TiF: 0
>Confession Thread(936 posts): Tranny: 2 ; Troon: 4 ; TiF: 0
>Stupid Questions Thread(1028 posts): Tranny: 1 ; Troon: 1 ; TiF: 0
>Annoying Thread Thread(575 posts): Tranny: 2 ; Troon: 0 ; TiF: 0
Honestly you are in no place to call anyone paranoid and then get ridiculously defensive when someone dares to ask for one example to back up your claims. None of the posts I saw were bait, derailing or excessive in any way and were on topic. And I'm sick and tired of newfags trying to turn lolcow into crystal cafe 2.0 but sprinkled with an extra portion of twitter and underage. Honestly the only good thing about this is that AG is slightly more active but at some point enough is just enough.

No. 14785

did you really delete all the kpop threads

No. 14786

>>14784
I'm not a newfag and have no desire to 'turn lolcow into crystal cafe', what I want is for some element of the original board culture to be retained, which I don't feel has been effectively done.

Again, my original point stands in that it is not my job to find and link posts to satisfy some random anon, I have mentioned it here as I think it's a problem the mods can look into it and agree or disagree, I do report it whenever rules are broken. People are allowed to make complaints in the complaints thread.

People likely don't complain about ana's months and months after the issue as they probably don't view that that as having been a persistent issue in the way the radfem sperging has. If you feel differently about the ana issue feel free to complain about it here and dont forget to post some examples!

I don't know what poll you're talking about other than the recent one that was dismissed as having had the results manipulated in some way? If there have been other polls, I was not aware and I'm sure many other users were not either.

If you search other obvious terms 'trannies', 'trans', 'ftm', 'tim', these numbers are significantly higher - but like I said it's also that these posts result in a lot of responses because they are deraily and baity, if you include all the derailing responses to those posts, the numbers obviously go up further.

I called you paranoid for implying I am trans based off nothing, which is paranoid. Me not linking posts to some random user isn't defensive and wouldn't make me calling you paranoid hypocritical in anyway.

If you think none of the posts were bait, derailing, or excessive then great, that's your opinion. I disagree. I'm happy to hear about AG, hopefully you will actually go there now ♥

No. 14787

>>14784
>>14785
shut the fuck up assholes my post will go unnoticed again

No. 14788

>>14786
What is interesting is that over there they talk about how much they hate this site but instead of just going to their containment haven they shit up the board. Some of us don't want to talk about men all the time, there are much more interesting things to discuss like anons larping about superpowers, actual hobbies, careers, coding, vents.

No. 14789

>>14788
exactly that's all I'm saying

No. 14790

the sex workers are pulling a radfem in the confession thread(15 year old spamchan)

No. 14791

>>14790
>everyone who disagrees with the idea of sending some random girl you don't know's sex worker page to their mom for literally no reason is a sex worker

No. 14792

>>14791
you're literally whining because we're not feminist enough for you. i already told you this, go back to twitter.(15 year old spamchan)

No. 14793

>>14790
The problem isn't radfems, it's all of you accusing each other of being radfem when none of you clearly are. You're just saying shit that is current to try to make yourself seem right, you know the mods are cracking down on feminism so you use that as an excuse for infighting. Not everyone is some evil feminist or some r9k pick me.

No. 14794

>>14793
>Not everyone is some evil feminist or some r9k pick me.
also
>Go back to r9k radfembot
exactly my point. you would understand if you read the conversation but you obviously don't care, you'd rather be offended at everything. what a sad existence

No. 14795

>>14794
Sorry forgot to put NTA. I was referring to both of you since she called you a radfembot and you said she's a twitter feminist. Neither of you seem feminist to me, more like you're just accusing each other in the hopes the mods will take your side since radfems aren't welcome.

No. 14796

>>14795
>Neither of you seem feminist to me
i never claimed to be a feminist
>you're just accusing each other
well, bait is against the rules

i don't really care for the radfem vs troons thing if that's what you're thinking, i'm just sick of the white knights and twitterfags roaming around /ot/ now

No. 14797

>>14793
It's a boogey man term at this point. Anons really don't get the irony of accusing people of being radfems while simultaneously being angry at being called trannies.

Really don't want to encourage this trend of banning everything because two anons are triggered. Like some anon above really wants to ban Kpop and thinks if they complain enough like the PP and GC threads, it'll happen. Semi-related but I genuinely believe imageboards thrive on limited moderation/censorship, once we start policing everything according to the group that screeches loudly enough, might as well go to Reddit.

No. 14798

>>14795
I don't see what I have said that seems unfeminist and I didn't say anything about the post being against any rules for mods to even be involved to 'take my side', I think people are allowed to respond to the confessions posted in that thread? There were posts supporting her above mine that no one cared about but when I responded originally they immediately came here to say the 'sex workers are pulling a radfem', it's like any opinion that goes against the usual pornsick males, tranny, whores script there is a problem with. And I didn't think it was a 'twitter' feminist thing to think it isn't a good thing to send some random girls sex worker profile to their parents I thought it was just like a normal person thing I guess not.

No. 14799

>>14798
it's not an issue to respond to the confessions made in the thread, but don't continue in an argument, debate, whatever it is. post your opinion if you really feel the need to and move on. be the bigger person. it's constant infighting and it really shits up the thread.

No. 14800

>>14799
They posted here about 'sex workers pulling a radfem' when I had only posted my original comment and it's just annoying sometimes that if you post anything other than the accepted talking points you get a bunch of hateful responses that you're then not allowed to respond to bc I think it stifles discussion or diverse opinions but either way you're still probably right and I agree with you

No. 14802

>>14798
>You do not care about women at all
i mean, what kind of response did you expect. then you blindly called everyone radfems and r9kbots to top it all off. you seem too emotional to be here anyways, why are you so pissed that some random sw is being referred to as a whore

>>14800
you obviously didn't want a 'dicussion and diverse opinions' lmao, you were trying to instigate a fight. if you did, you wouldn't be namecalling people because we're not being uwu positive and validating your shitty life choices

No. 14804

>>14802
why does everyone get so butthurt about anonymous posts? we are all anon. no one wins the discussion and you're definitely not going to change anyone's viewpoint. continuing to insult another anon derails and shits up the thread. imo both posters are at fault for continuing on the topic.

i would love an /ot/ hellweek for infighting and anons sperging at each other for their vent, confession, or dumbass shit.

No. 14805

>>14770
agreed. i was one of the first anons who brought up the issue of radfem spergs many many months ago and i now regret it. those threads never shoulda been merged nor banned, it was fine just being contained.

No. 14806

>>14786
Most people know how to report infighting and ana-chan bullshit instead of starting a 50-post long reply chain about how "you're ruining the board reeee". I suggest you do the same. This shit always happens like this, a recent example from one of the /ot/ threads was that someone deliberately baited people with "I don't hate trannies and pronoun spergs are annoying!!!" post and then went into a fucking war with anons who disagreed with them. Even when someone in the mental disorders thread vented about their bpd tranny friend requiring constant validation for their gender, making the mention of their trans status essential to the story, someone claimed that it's a PP sperg making stuff up to shit talk trans people. If you're so bothered by people having bad experiences with nutty troons then don't engage and bait like this.

While people made "hi scrote/tranny"ing a bannable offense how about also banning "hi radfem" because you can't even call out an insane person's delusions without people having a tantrum over muh ratfems ruining the site. You don't have to be a PP poster to think trannies are crazy or that maleposters are annoying.

>>14793
This. Radfem is now being used as a catch-all term for people you don't agree with because you know mods will ban the subject matter. It's happened so many times, a new thing becomes a bannable topic and infighting anons start abusing the fuck out of it to win an internet argument.
>mods pls ban the radfem derailing in thread x for the offense of hurting my feelings!!!!!

No. 14807

>>14806
NTA but
>Even when someone in the mental disorders thread vented about their bpd tranny friend requiring constant validation for their gender, making the mention of their trans status essential to the story
Is this not allowed anymore? Would this be considered a bait post even without the OP engaging in infighting?

No. 14808

It's normal to insult every category under the Sun on this site and imageboards in general but "sex workers" are immune to criticism? I don't understand.

No. 14809

Why is Venus in /w/ still?

No. 14810

>>14778
Agreed, and I also noticed many lesbian-bashing posts lately, both on /ot/ and now in the lesbian thread.

No. 14811

>>14808
Sex workers have never been immune to criticism here. Sounds like your post was the issue. You can be right and an asshole who no one likes at the same time.

No. 14812

>>14809
Because she belongs there, where else would she belong?

No. 14813

>>14811
I didn't post anything, I was just observing the discourse.

No. 14814

Is there a reason why sometimes meta on my phone and mac turns into a downloadable link instead of sending me to /meta/?

No. 14815

>>14784
Thank you for doing all this. I was curious and checked a few threads and found the same.

No. 14816

>>14720
please

No. 14817

>>14805
Careful, or you'll get an 5everban.

No. 14818

>>14805
It wasn't even contained back then. Things are better now but I think some anons are obviously trolling or stirring the pot because summer and rona.

No. 14819

I just read through some reports and appeals, to clarify, "hi cow" is against the rules. "Hi troon" is similar and is being banned, there's no reason for "hi radfem" to not fall under the same umbrella. It goes both ways.

No. 14820

>>14819
thank you!

No. 14821

File: 1588886908988.jpg (198.79 KB, 791x795, Q3m60mT.jpg)


No. 14822

>>14821
Meh, seems inaccurate. Reddit seems more of a centrist site that doesn't tolerate most extremists, so extremists think the reddit staff "work" for the other side when their board gets deleted.
Anonymous imageboards are the only type of website that let rightwing authoritarians exist without censorship in any real numbers.

No. 14824

Can you guys ban the retard on youngcynical's thread that is obviously her and keeps needlessly bumping the thread with 4chan lingo arguments that go nowhere.

No. 14825

>>14824
have no idea who she is checked the thread out, its just some faggot complaining about her body and anons defending her? or getting mad that theyre calling her ugly or fat?

No. 14826

>>14819
So calling someone a troon and whatnot is bankable? Not just 'hi troon' but calling someone a troon because of something? It's so derailing and literally causes infighting all the time and that's the only reason the anons want to be able to use it.

No. 14827

>>14824
seething because it hits too close to home?

No. 14828

>>14825

My complaint its that there's a handful of posts that are obviously her in both sides of the argument because of writing style and lingo.

>>970541

>do me a favor and neck yourself
>>970491
>not a newfag, i just don't feel like doing it. punish me mommy

>>970432

>ah yes the two body types, ana and hamplanet. kys fattie, no one will ever love you, it's over.

Look at her twitter for 3 seconds and you can tell its the same person.

No. 14829

>>14828
dude. do you really think. that she's the only one. who types like this. dude. come on.

No. 14830

>>14829

Im not that stupid but suspiciously enough the person who types just like her keeps bumping up the thread when its dead and going to page 2 soooooo

No. 14831

>>14830
1. i replied to a 3h old post
2. it's not just me who posted that shit earlier
3. you derailed a whole ass thread because some bitch called a tiktok incel fat
4. you're retarted
5. how are you not still banned for white knighting this bad
6. suck me my penis you stupid cunt(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 14832

>>14831

Oh so it was just an incel scrot! Thx for outing yourself.

No. 14833

>>14832
you're welcum. brb ip jumping so i can wreck your shit some more kek

No. 14834

>>14832
dont be a faggot nig nog, plenty of anons type like that. too many twitterfags invaded lolcow

No. 14835

>>14831
>tfw you get banned for saying suck me my penis, a very common expression in your home country
god bless koshitzkan

>>14834
hey wuss poppin b(maleposting)

No. 14836

>>14797
>Might as well go to Reddit
This anon. There's a reason we come to an anonymous site, we don't want an autistic echo chamber and insta bans for not subscribing to the popular opinion.

No. 14837

>>14826
>Admin-sama please ban the GC people, they're just causing infighting and infecting other threads!
>Admin-sama! Ban the radfem spergs, they're literally choking the board to death with infighting!
>Get rid of the PP thread right now! There's nothing but infighting in there!
>Admin-sama, could we also ban the word "troon"? I-it's o-only used for infighting!
I think someone predicted this shit just a few months ago. The envelope gets pushed further and further.

No. 14838

>>14837
Don't forget "Please remove the no men rule!" and "Nuke /ot/ and maybe /g/, all to get rid of them radfems of course" while also claiming r9k raids were only a short-term problem and don't exist anymore when robots namedrop lolcow literally every day on their board by now and seeth about it. Hell I wouldn't even be half as butthurt about this if they wouldn't have the nerve to say this obvious agenda is for the board culture and for "a bigger variety of opinions" and fully taking advantage of admins desire to do a decent job and listen to complains. And I'm using "they" as in mostly one person who has been making over the top drastic demands and claims in at least half of the last thread and in this thread. I'm not saying there are no anons who agreed with some of their posts, but the difference is that those anons are at least much more reasonable. For example I'd be totally up for >>14788 and bump and create more hobby-related threads on /ot/ instead of the more vent-y ones but trying to censor anons for mentioning the frustrating men/tranners in their life is simply not a good take. /sperg

Further mentions is probably not good since this thread is not for infights and pointless arguments yadda yadda and I wont say anything more but I wanted that to get out there.

No. 14839

>>14837
This.
>>14838
Awkward because I think the no men rule is obnoxious, but I'm not that anon. I actually agree with you kek.

No. 14840

>>14819
I was banned for calling someone a radfem but agree with it being ban-able because it leads to derailing - but at the same time this should have been clarified somewhere first, people aren’t mind readers, anons call each other lib-fems or twitter sjws or whatever all the time so it’s hard to know where the actual line is

No. 14841

>>14838
> robots namedrop lolcow literally every day on their board by now and seeth about it

do you not see how having banned men politicises the board in a way that will further attract weird extremist types including robots. All the things that were annoying regarding posts robots made would still be banned offences for other reasons regardless of the male rule. I don’t really care about this rule but it’s annoying people act like there’s always some secret agenda instead of just a genuine suggestion, everyone who disagrees with you is not always acting in bad faith.

No. 14842

File: 1588932851329.gif (454.37 KB, 342x294, love you.gif)

i haven't posted here in like 5 years but i for one am glad the website is still alive and kicking and continues to make the endless legion of boring virginal manlet white men from online places like /r9k/ seethe with their perpetual desire to invade women's spaces / make everything about themselves [when things are about them 23.9/7 in the real world already]

when i was destroying r9k in 2012 by being an insufferable tripfag, that was good, excellent, great, tubular, now lolcow.farm can continue holding the torch by being a bastion of a women's-only-chan-space and epicly pwn the moids

keep up the good work admin [if the admin is still the same person who banned me for a minute to give me a secret message in the form of a ban message because i knew something i wasn't supposed to post]

No. 14843

>>14839
>Awkward because I think the no men rule is obnoxious

Why though. /g/ wouldn't even work if it was full of men all the time. Thank god that they get banned now.

No. 14844

>>14842
Post the secret message again then, admins are changed 10000 times

No. 14845

>>14842
Aren't you the former BO of /girltalk/ on 8ch that was outed as a tranny?

No. 14846

>>14842
>by being a bastion of a women's-only-chan-space
too bad this isn't true anymore.

No. 14847

File: 1588951209504.jpg (38.02 KB, 519x536, 1586377762467.jpg)

>>14846
>>14843
Scrotes have always been banned
>>14842
>tripfag

No. 14848

>>14842
hey i'm a 'male' as well so you don't have to pretend around me(ban evading )

No. 14849

>>14847
I know. Anons are crazy to suggest LC should roll out the welcoming mat to robots.

No. 14850

>>14842
Hi swami. It's been a long time. Are you taking questions?

No. 14851


No. 14852

Ban swami

No. 14853

>>14852
yeah ban that fucking tranny

No. 14854

nevermind ban me instead im kinda tired ngl need a quick nap do it doi tit

No. 14856

>>14853
>>14844
it's p boring, the original owner of the site was / is? good friends with a popular youtuber who i was friends with but whom i haven't interacted with in a while due to being off social media / twitter nowadays [i could probably join her discord and hit her up though] and the owner didn't want people to know they were friends i guess, and let that known to me by deleting my post and giving me a 1 minute ban with a special message

>>14845
i was friends / acquaintances with hotwheels and was one of the first adopters of 8chan along with owning /fem/ [a board that was supposed to be only for women] but two problems occurred: i was a boring 'anti-feminist' / 'anti sjw' enlightened centrist back then instead of my much better pro-feminism, pro-leftism politics nowadays, so i was reluctant to do it for free on the board and ban incels [before they were called incels,] / r9k posters / pol posters, 'beta males', etc, and two, i was at the point i think where i didn't really give a shit about chan culture or posting anymore so i stopped caring about the board, as i started posting the most on 4chan's /r9k/ when i was a popular trip from like 2011 to 2013 [when i was 14 to 15? 16? years old] and 8chan from like 2014-2016 [when i was 16 / 17 to 19 years old]


/girltalk/ and uhhhh /tradfem/ were made by a board named /baphomet/ who failed to dox me like a dozen times, and it led to one of the global moderators and owners of kiwifarms, null, getting de-global modded by hotwheels because he put out a bitcoin? crypto? bounty on me on /baphomet/ to get me doxed. because null was also a very large lolcow, he was using global mod powers to scrape the IP addresses of people who would make fun of him, and i think use them to coordinate doxings against people, so that led to him getting de-modded too

i remember his really pathetic apology message in the 'board owner' PM section where he was forced to apologize to me by hotwheels and stuff, and i only wish i could've screenshotted it back then to post nowadays because apparently kiwifarms is a big thing now or something

>>14846

idunno, /g/ seems like a pretty healthy space for women and the gossiping / cattiness seen on stuff like /pt/ is very particularly done in a way that only cis & trans women could have perpetuated it, as men are very boring and autistic with how they go about their 'drama' and whatever

>>14847

uh based

>>14848

idk what this means but lmao banned

>>14850

sure

>>14852
>>14853

lol

No. 14858

>>14856
lmao we know ian was friends with shoe0nhead

No. 14860

>>14858
idk who ian is but ya that was the ''''secret''''

why was the original owner a dude [i am assuming ian was a dude] and why has the website changed owners so much in the past 5 years?

>>14857


if you keep ban evading harder maybe you'll be wanted more eventually

No. 14861

>>14856
are you done blogposting yet troon?

No. 14862

>>14861
seething

No. 14863

File: 1588969930347.png (707.76 KB, 851x692, 35f54344164be8771fa9912410f161…)

>>14862
This you faggot?

No. 14864

>>14856
I remember when people said that "PP spergs" are just delusional thinking that there are false flaggers and trannies lurking around and caping for themselves. First ham-chan gets revealed and now fucking swami outed himself openly and starts blogposting about his life like he was on the Tonight Show. For fucks sake give me a break already.

No. 14865

LMAOO

>>14860
you wasted your whole life on imageboards for this

No. 14866

>>14864
pp spergs are still delusional, even a broken clock is right twice a day

No. 14867

>>14863
like 6 years ago when i was 17 ya, i'm nearing my 5th year of hrt in a few days and [fortunately] look much hotter / actually like a woman. i think legally trans women should be barred from the internet until they're at least in their 2nd or more year of hrt
>>14864
idk what any of this means because i'm not autistic and boring but this seems like it's pretty autistic and boring
>>14865
i'm a nurse now w/ a great social life along with being in a committed long term relationship, and i think i have done pretty well to amend my wasted time on the *chans [which rot your brains and are an immensely pathetic waste of your time]

getting offline is probably the best thing you can do for your life, idk how the internet is even legal to be on(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 14868

File: 1588970436992.png (103.63 KB, 1834x362, Screenshot_2020-05-08 r9k - P…)

>>14862
>/pt/ is very particularly done in a way that only cis & trans women could have perpetuated it, as men are very boring and autistic with how they go about their 'drama' and whatever
Spoiler, you are a boring pathetic man. look at you holding onto some pathetic sekrit about OG admin being a thirsty shoe0nhead orbiter loser just like you.

No. 14870

File: 1588970660896.png (88.47 KB, 1525x562, Screenshot_2020-05-08 r9k - P…)

>>14869
kek he's been larping as nurse for a minute

No. 14871

Jesus, the quality of this site and the trash that inhabits it becomes worse every day.

At this point you'd have to ban over two-thirds of your userbase to undo the cancer.

No. 14872

Please do something about the current unsaged, newfag troon posting across all boards.

No. 14873

>>14868
This ratchet man in a dress legitimately thought he was all slick coming here flaunting about how "he knows the super secret admin drama" when literally everyone who wasn't born yesterday knows about Ian putting up lolcow to be a honeypot for shoeonhead. Even bragging about pissing off null when it's probably the easiest fucking thing to do in the world and there isn't a cow alive who hasn't had beef with that piece of autism.

Get out swami, you're literally the male equivalent of spoony.

No. 14874

Can we please have another Hellweek? TBH you guys should do it once a month because this shit is getting bad.

No. 14878

lmao, this is the site admin deserves

No. 14880

>>14879
lol not me, but i'll take the years for them so they may continue :)(:))

No. 14885

Major cowtipper situation in the Amanda Bret thread on /snow/. Anon claims she/he contacted the family and sent them a lolcow link.

No. 14886

>>14856
were you friends with someone who went by the name ophelia?

No. 14900

test

No. 14901

test

No. 14903

Can somebody take a look on the newest venus thread? The newfags shit everything up and it's unreadable.

No. 14904

So in the confession thread on ot what counts as "commentary"? Because I just went there and there's a ton of comments that aren't confessions or are you only banning disagreeing "commentary" there?

No. 14905

>>14903
I agree, it should be put on autosage, we can't report every single post.

No. 14907

At this point, I don't understand why Venus even has a thread on this site if it's so full of people defending her. It is causing a lot of infighting for people who come to her thread to a laugh at her.. because she is a cow and she is featured on lolcow.

No. 14908

>>14907
Having different opinions doesn't make everyone a WK. Threads are made for discussion, not getting mad and derailing about how much you think she is a pedo because of a meme everyone knows. Not everything posted in the thread needs to be a constant teardown and drag but that also doesn't mean that if they are't doing that they are WKing because you don't agree.

No. 14909

>>14907
that thread is a mess, now someone is writing a novel anout some girl that kinda maybe is like penus lmao wtf

No. 14911

a mod is needed to clear up the spam in /g/, i've been reporting it

No. 14914

There was a massive spamfest that lasted throughout the evening, this individual exploited TOR to do so. Due to the overwhelming amoung of newfags and bored spammers we've decided to ban TORposting for the time being. Apologies to any well behaved TOR posters, but it's easier on the moderation team since we can't be awake 24 hours of the day in case there's any more gore and scat posted. Anons are still free and able to use VPNs, hopefully the corona hysteria will subside in a few weeks. A big thank you to all the anons reporting spam and obvious newfaggotry,

Edit: a link will be posted here 1 hour before the townhall


No. 14915

can we get rid of the hellweek banner? it was over a month ago

No. 14916

>>14914
Thank you admin!

No. 14917

Why are mods banning people from just making fun of racist anons on ot? Wasn't the issue supposed to be race baiting?
Why is it bad to call out someone saying they want to be racist and not being criticized for it?

At least put 'taking the bait' or something as the reason for the ban.

Meanwhile mods leave red text shitposts on the kpop thread.

Great standards, not biased at all.

No. 14919

A mod is very much needed for Marilyn Manson thread. One of his victims came to the thread and we are experiencing a little bit of a clusterfuck.
Thank you
>>>/snow/969968

No. 14920

>>14594
Been trying to get voice verified on the discord for hours now when there’s 100+ people online, I need a mod please

No. 14921

>>14920
Did you @ the mods on the server or DM personally? They wont just come to you in the chats.

No. 14922

>>14921
I can only see the #sex-relationships channel but can’t see any of the messages, can’t write anything, can’t @ any mods so I can’t let anyone know I’m waiting, which I definitely tried to see if I could let anyone know I wanted to be verified. When I click on the server I’m basically stuck with no way to contact anyone

No. 14923

>>14922
Did you @ the channel to get posting privileges in the whole discord? Read pins

No. 14924

>>14594
oh wow my bad. i forget the bot when you first join the discord DM'd me and that's how you get verified and get any access. thank you anyway lol

No. 14925

Can the mods do something about constant 'YOURE A WK' derailing in the fucking threads when people are just trying to discuss and not defend topics? This screeching is so fucking tiresome. Its like there is an influx of people demanding only dragging of cows and you're not allowed to be biased or disagree with anything they say.

No. 14926

>>14925
Added question: Can we report these as derailing when the whole post is just sperging out about how you are bad for not agreeing and you're a WK and how dare you not think the same as me posts? Its like you cant have an actual discussion about any cows anymore because the newfags here would rather fly off the rails with shitty tinfoil and nitpicking photos for nonexistent milk just to bump threads. If you call them out they screech 'WK WK WK'.

No. 14927

>>14926
Many people come here to drag cows. Sure you can "discuss" them but cows don't end up here for no reason. If you keep posting stuff that paints a cow in a positive light, you should probably expect pushback.

No. 14928

>>14927
Theres a difference between painting them in a positive light and praising them and then having a different opinion and view on something that isn't tinfoiling into nonsense about nitpicked bullshit and getting and getting mad when someone doesn't agree and they derail with posts demanding you're a whiteknight. The threads are littered with unsaged 'youre just a wk because you don't agree with my deep tinfoil and saying that xyz is pedo because of this minuscule detail'.

Its not actual productive to the thread.

No. 14930

Can the Luna Sobieski thread in /snow/ be autosaged? I feel it's all self-posts. She has no milk and has been caught self-posting before. The thread seems to have a non-saged post when it hits page 2 or 3 the past few days.

No. 14931

>>14919
Yes seriously, I've been following this thread since the start and it's full of the same people posting at each other and it's insanely hard to follow because nothing of substance is actually being posted. It's full of samefags I swear. Can't tell if it's lindsay and the other person just posting at each other but it's cancerous as fuck.

No. 14932

>>14917
If this is regarding the confessions thread then read the OP.

No. 14933

A mod needs to come and tell these dumbasses top stop demanding Venus is a pedo and pedo pandering? Saying an adult with facetune looks like a 2-year-old. Holy shit the derailing is ridiculous! Also now we have some fucktard uploading gore >>>/w/93091

No. 14934

There's been a lot of race baiting in the kpop thread for the past week now and I've tired reporting some but it's just too much. It's the weird kboos arguing about black people and how only Asians can be uwu idols again and that conversation always goes left very quickly

No. 14935

>>14933
Admin should just delete the Venus thread altogether, it's been sad and pathetic for years on end. Let the cow out of its misery.

No. 14936

Can we report any posts only posting to say 'whiteknight' when no one agrees with them or when they're bullshit gets called out and contradicted by other posts in the thread or proof from other sources? It's so derailing and they get mad when their tinfoiling is shut down and then they scream WK because of it. Is this something mods even care about as it involves thread quality?

No. 14937

File: 1589487679046.jpeg (132.41 KB, 750x926, C9EB2590-57FA-4820-B084-EF2D2F…)

SHOW ME THE FUCKING RACEBAITING AND PP SPERGING WHERE???
It’s not hi troon jesus christ it just sounds like troon logic to wanna be harassed
Your vendetta is fucking pathetic

No. 14938

>>14937
Sounds like this was warranted. Look at your comment even. You are baiting.

No. 14939

>>14938
Baiting whom?? If I said it was femcel logic no one would bat an eye. No one batted an eye at this comment even. Just become a tranny hug box already.

No. 14940

>>14939
You completely sound like you are trying to infight by baiting with insults. Its 3 days. Just wait it out. Your comment alone here makes sense you'd get a flag.

No. 14941

>>14939
Also from >>14940 it'll probably get extended now because you are outting yourself ban evading.

No. 14942

>>14941
>>14940
Ok bootlicker obviously you have reading comprehension disability because I’m only banned from one board. Anyway I’m waiting for these alleged racebait and male genocide posts I’ve been accused of making.

No. 14943

can we warn newfags who post an unrelated image to either try to be attention catching or because they think they have to? i know it's not avatarfagging but it calls attention to them.

No. 14944

>>14943
You mean when they drop an unrelated photo for the 'ha' of it with commentary in hopes that the images stays up even though is has nothing to do with the topic? I've seen so many people throw images up as reactions over and over with minuscule commentary added to it to make it pass. It is annoying because then you have to scroll past all this bullshit.

No. 14945

>>14944
yes, that's exactly what i mean.

No. 14946

>>14945
I'm seconding this too then. This isn't a chatroom where people need to see a pictured idea of how you feel about something. Comparing photos I think is fine, but it's as bad as people spamming 'no fun allowed' signage when they get told to stfu for derailing and tinfoiling off the face of the earth or when they get banned.

No. 14947

>>14936
I second this, I also feel like people infighting about whitenighting would happen less if there was slightly more enforcement against people posting non-cows who barely have any milk here. I feel like because these people are not really that cowish there’s a larger portion of people who are inclined to defend them whereas back when most of the people posted here were actually cows there was less infighting over whitenighting

No. 14948

>>14947
The nitpicking to create milk with these cows is crazy too. We have so many threads in /w/ and /snow/ that feature one cow specifically when all they do can be thrown into a photoshop thread or a cringe thread. Its like the people who took that Venus shopped out all her wrinkles and suddenly people are screaming she's trying to appeal to pedophiles. Venus is a bad example as she deserves a thread, though. But that's the type of nitpicking and then making 30 posts on top of it about how this is edited. No shit it's edited

No. 14949

>>14948
I totally agree, I think people are just posting any public figure they want to discuss even if they aren’t cowish in anyway and then nitpicking the most mundane things - you cant even report it because it would be essentially every post.

No. 14950

>>14949
And they add just enough to skip by the report by putting in something actually related to the topic even if 90% of the post has nothing to do with it. The anons think we don't know what they are doing, but they make it very obvious, but I don't know if the admins care or if this is just too stupid to care about. In general I think this degrades threads and should be reported under 'spam' or 'nitpicking vendetta' and should be redtexted more often to show what posts like these fall under to make it clear that its honestly shitposting with 10% thrown in to be relevant.

No. 14951

>>14942
The previous racebaiting and pp sperging isn't apart of the current "hi cow"/ "hi troon" ban, it was noted in your ban history. So you should know better than "hi troon" since you've gotten similar bans before.
It is true you're only banned from /ot/ for anons wondering.
>>14949
>>14950
There are thread guidelines in the rules page. If you disagree with a thread it's effective to report it as opposed to infighting in the thread.

No. 14952

I know it's a meme at this point, but the Kpop threads lured way more Twitterfags here than PP/GC ever did.

Also I'm sick of seeing smug little Kpop chodes with stupid haircuts on the homepage.

No. 14953

>>14944
>>14946
This is completely normal image board culture?

No. 14954

>>14953
Yes but lc is basically Twitter 2.0 at this point and the twitterfags don't like imageboard culture so it must go!

No. 14955

>>14953
apparently reaction images are now a foreign concept

No. 14956

>>14955
>>14954
>>14953
Not saying they should or shouldn't be but reaction images or 'low quality images' have been against the rules since day one, I think posting them used to actually get you banned back in the early days if I remember correctly. It isn't a new thing because of twitter users.

No. 14957

Some newfag is necroing an old GC thread in /ot/. Pretty sure they're also samefagging.

No. 14958

>>14953
>>14954
>>14955
no, retard, using reaction images isn't the problem.

No. 14959

>>14958
Seriously. It's the spamming of them in some threads where a reaction image to your 'LOL what a bitch this whore deserves this' posts that go along with it every 10 or so. Especially if you disagree with the one anon who wants to reee the fuck out and drop these without adding any value to the thread as if this were some chatroom. No one is saying you can't use reaction images. Anons are saying the spam of them without any value just to infight or bait or dictate how you feel just to post it and clutter up a thread is the issue.

No. 14960

>>14959
lc isn't that deep.

No. 14961

>>14960
You're not in the right threads where it turns into a sperg fest between two anons literally replying nothing to each other besides insults and kek with shitty reaction images to go with it.

No. 14962

>>14960
>isn't that deep
it's not deep enough to have shitposters and trolls???

No. 14963

>>14959
Do you not know how imageboards work

No. 14964

>>14963
you obviously don't. image boards ban that kind of spammy attention grabbing shit. also i'm pretty sure on lolcow using an image negates sage and bumps the thread anyway still (though i could be wrong).

No. 14965

>>14963
This isn't like 4chan where you need to add an image to how you feel at all times without adding any contribution to a thread.

No. 14966

is /s allowed? it's very reddity

No. 14967

>>14964
no it doesn’t so you really don’t know what you’re talking about kek

No. 14968

>>14967
lmao, do you? the backend of this hasn't been updated in years. that used to and still may be the default.

No. 14969

>>14968
NTA but current admin updated a lot of things when they came onboard, IIRC. eg. /PT/ was stuck in infinite auto-sage prior with some gimmicky coding that was annoying for them to fix, or some shit. I don't really remember the details

unrelated, but what the fuck is with all the retards sperging 'twitterfags!' lately? (for the record, I've never used twitter or anything other than chan-based image boards for online chatting, to be blunt, so I'm a bit out of the loop there)

No. 14970

>>14969
Because so many cows have been cowtipped by linking them to their threads on Twitter and K-pop spergs can't fucking stop sharing screenshots of their thread on their twitter profile we've gotten a surge of spergy newfag twitter users who haven't integrated to the board culture, i.e. twitterfags. They're usually a 2020 rehash of tumblrinas who migrated to twitter after tumblr went tits up.

No. 14971

>>14969
I think anon's point is it's standard for image boards to have images negate sage initially so >>14967 is really outing themselves rn.

No. 14972

>>14971
>outing themselves
how though? this hasn't been the case for lc in years

No. 14973

>>14972
They mean being a newfag

No. 14974

>>14973
i get that but don't see how it's that obvious an out

No. 14975

Is this website still run by a TRA who won't let us criticize trannies, but is fine with general cis-man hate?

No. 14976

>>14975
Because it derails way more than man hate and you idiots only use those terms to insult others who don't agree with you most of the time. So yeah, hopefully.

No. 14977

>>14976
You mean like how the term TERF and radfem gets thrown around?

Great to see that lolcow, a primarily female-oriented space, is going to get completely overrun by men pretending to be women.

No. 14978

>>14977
dude shut up you have an imageboard of your own

No. 14979

>>14978
I rest my case, lol.

No. 14980

doesnt everyone get tired of having this discussion on a weekly basis?

No. 14981

>>14980
That's when their bans are up probably.

No. 14982

>>14981
Lmao my sides

I'm waiting for the admin labeled posts showing both sides are samefag. Please let it be true

No. 14983

>>14982
Why would it be the case

No. 14984

>>14983
Anon, assumes that there can't be other oldfags who feel this way.

No. 14985

There has been a lot of MH spergs lately in /g/ and /ot/

No. 14986

>>14983
>>14984
I don't care about this topic what-so-ever, it'd just be fucking hilarious to turn out like that.

No. 14987

>>14986
Tbh it did happen before, and it was a radfem pretending to be a scrote lmao

No. 14988

Why is it that every time someone posts a long dump of pics, the number of posts in the front page gets smaller?

No. 14989

>>14975
>>14977
>>14979
Don't start with this awkward false-flagging shit again. At this point everyone knows that there are people intentionally stirring shit on /meta/ with the "admin is a troon!!!11" baiting to force all criticism of trannies out off the site because of muh evil terves infighting and derailing.

No. 14990

>>14987
lmao that's comedic gold. outted samefagging has to be my favorite kind of mini-cow

No. 14991

>>14987
It wasn't even radfem pretending to be a scrote, iirc it was ham-chan pretending to be a radfem and a scrote sperging out at each other.

No. 14992

>>14991
>ham-chan
The plot …….. Thickens

(I'll see myself out)

No. 14994

>>14992
i appreciate your pun, ma'am

>>14991
i think it happened more than once

No. 14995

White knights are arguing that discussion of the Wachowskis in the celebcow thread is gender critical shit when the freaks are bonafide beef and milky as shit.

No. 14996

Bring pink pill back

No. 14997

>>14996
radfem or false flagger, shut the fuck up

No. 14998

Can a mod please kick out the Gender-crit from the Celebcow thread? They're shitting it up by bring in stale milk over the Wachowskis when the original post that started their tirade was new milk on Musk/Grimes.

No. 14999

>>14998

Stop white knighting the BDSM freaks.

No. 15000

>>14998
How is it gendercrit when they are posting about celebrities being cows? Then being trans is just part of it because they are dating some BDSM queen. It's not like the content is just haha they're troons!

No. 15001

>>15000
>>14999
That’s not what’s being discussed in the thread though and the only cowish things that have been brought up would only seem milky to you if you’re gender critical so it’s probably better they’re discussed somewhere specifically for gender critical discussion because people are just bringing up years old milk and sperging about trans people, the posts almost exclusively are ‘haha they’re troons’ and it’s repetitive and derailing and always leads to infighting

No. 15002

>>15001
Nigga what, Larry is a huge fucking cow and his trans status is a big part of it. He essentially started living out his sissyfication fantasy irl that a BDSM queen introduced him to. He forces extremely cringey troon commentary into his work such as his self-insert in sense8 being caped for by a ~strong black wommyn~ against the ~evil lesbian terves~ complete with a sex scene of her fucking the tranny with a rainbow strapon. Everything about him is an insane AGP having delusions and any person who has a brain cell left realizes it's not GC sperging to laugh at him for it. The discussion was initiated by laughing at his fetish lifestyle and blatant racism and then some butthurt anon starts having a spergout about muh GC discussion derailing. Cope.

No. 15003

>>15002
Someone being trans, being into bdsm, being an ‘AGP’, terfs ect are topics that are only interesting and cowish to gender critical people, especially when these are extremely old topics that are being dragged up, it’s not new celebrity gossip which is what the thread is actually used for, it’s people posting years old ‘milk’ and then going on a gender critical rant about it that is completely irrelevant to the thread, what I’m saying if the topic is only going to seem milky to someone interested in gender critical politics (if you have to use terms like TERF and AGP to describe it that’s probably a pretty good sign) then it would be better suited to a thread specifically regarding gender critical topics because that’s what it is

No. 15004

>>15003
NTAYRT. Those guys aren't interesting/milky to you? Thats all par for the course to you? Wild.

No. 15005

>>15003
>porn addicted cumbrain sissyfication trannies are not milky to anyone but GC spergs
>it's not relevant even though the tranny brothers are constantly creating new content to masturbate over
Anon what the fuck are you on

No. 15006

>>15003
Because trooning is co-morbid with a lot of personality disorders and paraphilias, a lot of troons happen to be cows for reasons that go beyond their gender identity. You can laugh at troon cows without being GC. Just look at Kiwifarms lol.

No. 15007

>>15003
Are you fucking serious? The Wachowskis are a joke in every movie circlejerk due to being freaks that want to shove their BDSM sissy fetish in everything they make, the producers had to step in for them to not add trans bdsm shit to the first matrix.

Its not a GC topic, im not GC, everyone laughed and/or was pissed at that Sense8 transbian fiasco, same will happen with the new Matrix.

No. 15008

>>15003
It's textbook cow behavior and was in the tabloids in the 90s.

No. 15009

>>15008
Ok but this is what I’m saying it’s not the 90’s, that was thirty years ago. All kinds of things were tabloid news in the 90’s that aren’t interesting how. The problem more is that the posts are old milk. I don’t care about someone posting about trans people who are cows at all but if them being trans is ‘a big part of what makes them a cow’ like the person I was responding to said then that isn’t in itself really milk or interesting outside of gc circles

No. 15010

>>15009
Just drop it already. Celeb cows are being discussed in the celebcows thread, they happen to be trans and huge creeps, they're still producing content. Scroll down or hide the thread if it bothers you so much that they're being discussed.

No. 15011

>>15009
Could the mods fucking ban this numbskull already. This is ridiculous, the Wachowskis are universally recognized as coomer nutcases and their obsessive pornsickness is the fucking reason they trooned out to begin with, they're still creating shitty content so they're clearly relevant. How the fuck do you come to /meta/ to cry about derailing when you start picking up a fight in the thread yourself just because your personal values were hurt and then try to come up with bullshit excuses about how a-actually i-it's just because t-they're not m-m-milky!!

No. 15012

pull users are trashing the in /w/ UK weeb thread. Its been off topic for hours, with debating among themselves if or if not mikan is wking herself. to the point their begging for Ip doxing. I get that they like cow tipping there but its annoying.

No. 15013

It should be a bannable offense to claim that someone's samefagging instead of just reporting

No. 15015

File: 1590160977009.png (58.67 KB, 780x1023, townhall.png)

Poll results from today's townhall. The next hellweek is scheduled for the week of June 14th. Changes for the updated server were voted on and anons gave their preferences for the themes I would prioritize porting over the next few weeks.

No. 15016

did i miss something or was the townhall banner up for only a few hours? would've attended if i'd known about it

No. 15017

>>15015
i missed this too, but i'm glad with the poll results. i think the /sno/w/ re-merger is a welcome change. /w/ only has a few active threads on it and there was a ton of grey areas.

No. 15018

>>15015
Didn't know there was going to be a town hall, guessing a lot of users didn't know since the voting turnout was so small. Are people really wanting a captcha to post? Is there some context I'm missing because I can't imagine anyone would actually be in favor of that.

No. 15019

>>15018
someone was spamming nsfw pics twice this week

No. 15020

If there's going to be a captcha, please add one without JS

No. 15021

>>15016
It was up a day or two. I think people got so used to the hellweek banner that they didn't even notice it changed to that.

No. 15022

Can we ban the same spammer that keeps shitting up clare buley's thread?

No. 15023

>>15013
I agree

No. 15024

What's the deal with the frivolous and incorrect bans in the dolly mattel thread? There seem to be newfags among the farmhands

No. 15025

there's a white knight sperging in shoe0nhead's thread and an incel sperging in the femcel thread

No. 15026

>>15024
seconded

No. 15027

People taking moid bait in lilith levisis thread

No. 15028

>>15015
>not even 20 votes
Why are polls not open to general populace?

No. 15029

>>15028
to prevent random people coming in and voting. townhall was there and it was poorly advertised but it's the best way to do it. if you want to vote you have to register to vote and you do that by just clicking a link and going to a town hall

No. 15030

>>15029
If registering to vote is so easy why limited it to some tiny window of town hall? Not everyone is in american time zone. I don’t see how that is going to prevent outsiders and repeated votes anyway.

No. 15031

>>15030
i'm not in american time zone either, the announcement is for gmt so that's redundant. you missed it, just be there next time and show commitment if you want it changed so bad

No. 15032

So when will yall ban the lowercase samefag that spergs up every single thread?

No. 15033

>>15032
>samefag
there are at least 2 different people

No. 15034

cp in /g/

No. 15035

>>15034
It's still up, wtf mods?

No. 15036

File: 1590366611664.jpeg (Spoiler Image,233.02 KB, 750x433, 0FE31709-9AD4-401A-B7A3-EA1642…)

There’s a suspicious Brittany Venti whiteknight in the shoeonhead thread. No farmer would defend goblina this much, it’s most certainly Venti

No. 15037

>>15036
i dunno, it's saged, it's probably just bait

No. 15038

Something need to be done about the Lilith Levisis thread. It's hands down one of the worst threads of this site and it a breeding ground of coomers.

No. 15041

Someone please ban the newfag in the Lillee jean who refuses to sage.
Extremely obvious it's the same person.

No. 15043

An anon keeps derailing and posting nitpicks throughout /w/. I reported them as vendettas because it's become really autistic now. It's not hard to spot who it is.

No. 15044

Inceloid males have been shitting up various threads in both /g/ and /m/ for days. Most of their posts are still up. As much as I love laughing at their adorable bitterness, I'd rather see them get banned.

No. 15045

>>15044
Probably same spergs posting about how saggy boobs are offensive in threads.

No. 15046

>>15044
this!

and there are sooo many newfriends in /ot/ . it's incredibly annoying seeing them not adapt to imageboard culture, be extremely politically correct (unironically) and use reddit terms. they are also starting petty fights. i think a lot of them are twitter stans. make it stop plz.

No. 15047

There's incels in the /m/ Webtoons thread, who are whining about how romance webtoons are too feminist and contributing to the downfall of western civilization and causing depression or something. It's getting annoying, I just wanna talk about webtoons.

No. 15048

huge infestation of scrots and newfags derailing and infighting in every single board. townhall needs to be called

No. 15049

>>15048
Did you really post this just after losing your shit in the relationship thread over one post? lmao

No. 15050

>>15049
Learn to sage, integrate and don't infight in /meta/, please.

No. 15051

>>15050
What is the point of sage-ing in /meta/? And you're not supposed to minimod either, turbo retard

No. 15052

>>15051
Shut up

No. 15053

>>15052
Wow, you sure showed me!

No. 15054

>>15051
You're right, but farmhands have been sitting on their hands all day and with the sudden influx of derailing newfags, what else can I do?

No. 15055

>>15054
Ive seen ban evasion and retared nitpicking red bans though today. Same with old milk.

No. 15056

I just got banned because multiple people called me a scrote? Alright. I guess I'll just wait for a few hours so the farmhands can calm down and use a different IP lmao. Weird ass mfs. Next time I'll use a pic of my pussy next to my posts, mmm?

No. 15058

>>15057
I was a scrote, now I'm a pickme, and later during the day I'll be a troon lmao I'm fucking evolving rn

No. 15059

>>15058
>>15056
Maybe if you saged your useless post. Share your ban page, anon.

No. 15060

>>15059
Now I have a few questions for you. What is a useful post? and which post are you talking about? Now, I didn't take a sc of my ban page because there were no messages left. I guess the mods are in a bad mood

No. 15061

>>15060
So your ban was…3 minutes or something? What do you mean there were no messages left if you just got it. To to the board you posted on and try to submit a post. Itll redirect you instantly.

No. 15062

I came here because I was just about to say that I feel like the site seems so much better recently than it has in a long time, but seeing the posts maybe there's some drama happening in threads I don't go in lmao. Anyway, at least in the threads I use I feel like there's been a lot of improvements recently summerfags aside

No. 15063

>>15061
he's consistently ban evading anon

No. 15064

>>15063
Yeah figured. Thats the red I keep seeing.

No. 15065

>>15061
I can't see it now that I changed my IP.

>>15063
This is getting tiring. Do I have to post my vagina so you will shut the fuck up for once?

No. 15066

>>15065
Post your pussy then lol

No. 15067


No. 15068

>>15065
Post your pussy slut

No. 15069

>>15065
Why have you gone quiet? Post your vagina if you're not a scrote

No. 15070

>>15068
>>15067
I would be a rando from google images.

No. 15071

>>15070
Post it bitch

No. 15072

>>15070
post it but draw a cow above it with the time so we know it's legit

No. 15073

>>15070
post it, it's what your robot friends would want you to do

No. 15074

>>15072
>>15071
>>15073
Meant to say 'it' would. I'm not scrote anon, lol. Anon wouldn't post their actual self.

No. 15075

Wtf is going on in here? Where are the adults? This reads like a bunch of incels from r9k trying to get a timestamped picture of a girl's vagina.

No. 15076

>>15075
post it

No. 15077

>>15075
>Sperg complains about getting called a scrote
>Anons decide the appropriate response is to shit up the meta thread

Peak quarantinefaggotry

No. 15078

>>15075
Thank you for being a reasonable person amongst all of this craziness. I mean, "post it bitch" and "post your pussy slut" lmao. And I'm the scrote/pick-me/troon? Make it make sense.

>>15077
How am I a sperg? I didn't start the derailing and I didn't write anything that was inflammatory except for "It's stupid to hate an entire gender because this man didn't want to date you". IRL, it's considered basic decency. Seriously, you guys need to go outside once the whole COVID-19 thing is over.

>>15069
Some of us have lives, mate. I'm not refreshing the page every second like you to see if 'scrote-sama' answered your low quality bait.

I'm now waiting for the farmhands to speak up. If they tell me to fuck off, I will. I don't see the point in staying in a community that discourages opposite and respectful opinions. But maybe you should clarify that this is a radfem only board. Goodnight!

No. 15079

>>15078
You defended men. Read the rules.

No. 15080

>>15078
read the rules vagina-chan, nobody cares about how much you love men

No. 15081

>>15079
Just checked again. There is no rule that tells you NOT TO defend men. Would you be so kind to show me?

>>15080
So now I have a vagina? Be consistent.

No. 15082

>>15081
I haven't called you a scrote anon, to me it's obvious you're just an underage yungcynical-esque pickmeisha but there may be others who disagree. If you post puci all the speculation will go away

No. 15084

can we get a farmhand to drop a friendly note in the vicky thread to stop infighting? it's getting derailed with a legbeard measuring contest.

No. 15085


No. 15086

>>15082
>says post puci
>calls me underage
Hey you just won a free Nintendo Switch! Give me your address and it will be shipped in 4-7 days!

Anyway, show me the mysterious rule you guys keep talking about. Because clearly you're bullshitting and I don't see the point when we can all see that it doesn't exist. Nice try though. Now I understand why the mods hate the userbase lol.

No. 15088

>>15086
one day a man will hurt you and you will regret being a pickme. just saying, anyone can get raped at anytime

No. 15089

Anon posted a pic of a cow in /snow/ and yeah that's not me. I'm neither a man neither a white woman! Again, nice try.

No. 15090

>>15088
pandering to men is embarrassing enough for her as it is. maybe it's sh0eonhead. anon that's what you have in store for you! enjoy

No. 15091

>>15088
>>15090
You're wishing that I get raped but I'm the one in the wrong? Yikes. I just said I'm not white, and how could I be sh0eonhead when I'm underage as you say?

No. 15092

>>15091
>wishing that I get raped
nobody said that anon but good job exposing your pickme fantasies!

No. 15093

>>15092
>one day a man will hurt you and you will regret being a pickme. just saying, anyone can get raped at anytime
>anon that's what you have in store for you! enjoy
C'mon dude. Anyone can read your posts so why do you keep lying?

No. 15094

>>15093
>your posts
you realise you've been talked about on /ot/ right? i'm not the only one replying but continue to reach, vagina-chan

No. 15095

>>15094
When I say your, I mean in the plural sense like vous.

No. 15096

>>15095
cool. tell us about your sex life

No. 15097

>>15096
Right… I'm going to step out of the conversation as it is getting hostile and futile. Anon would rather be edgy and use childish nicknames than talk like an actual person. I hope the farmhands come soon to clear things up.

No. 15098

File: 1590547819844.jpg (9.98 KB, 236x236, 47dacccb04c70d883d968e33bdd64d…)

>>15097
no literally tell me i'm not meming you're interesting and you're anon so why not tell us about yourself

No. 15099

>>15097
hopefully you'll rope yourself :)(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 15100

>>15099
come on now that's very unsportsmanlike(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 15101

>>15081
>Be consistent
Kek do you think all the anons on this thread except you are the same person?

No. 15102

>>15101
she does god bless her, she knows how to sage and that's about it but can she hit that Choose File tho…(ban evasion)

No. 15103

If you purposely bait and infight in /g/ we're going to ignore the mess you started. If you're going to whine about post [x] or post [y] it'll be ignored because you could have just easily used the report queue.

No. 15104

this radfem anti-men faggotry needs to end. disagreeing with these dumb, extremist ideologies is not the same as wanting men to use the site either, i just hate using the site without being dogpiled when i mention my boyfriend in a way that's not negative or point out that men who hate toxic masculinity aren't even the ones perpetuating it. extremists are incapable of having rational, adult conversations about adult topics. i hate that the internet has enabled so many people with poor critical thinking to learn the bare minimum about something and get praised for their opinions. watching almost all the people on the site debate anything is like being at the zoo. we're all fucking stupid, the least some of us could do is admit that.

No. 15105

>>15104
or just find another gossip site. Bye.

No. 15106

>>15104
Report infighting and move on. Stop being such a spergy crybaby.

No. 15107

>>15104
I agree but I think it’s gotten a lot better recently

No. 15108

>>15107
it is, i just got really annoyed about something this time. it's really getting better, thanks admin.

No. 15110

I already reported it but Please. For the love of God. Ban the LSA thread in /ot/. It's made by the same racebaiting sperg in the celeb cow thread and it will lead to eventual traffic of trouble here.

No. 15111

>>15106
Thank you, seconded.

No. 15112

>>15110
Seconded

No. 15113


No. 15114

>>15110
seriously it doesnt make sense to me? you guys ban the topic of race but keep the LSA thread up knowing full well people are going to cherry pick "racist" posts taken out of context. Its just weird to me

No. 15115

>>15114
the lsa thread could have been okay, the op seemed baity but op came back to clarify but we haven't had any actual milk so far and it's just been people saying it's racebaiting, saying it's not racebaiting and now people racebaiting in there too. i wish it wasn't like this but i really can't see anything productive coming out of keeping it open

No. 15116

The same two or three anons are shitting up the vent thread with race infighting

No. 15117

Anons shitting up >>>/m/92977 this thread with racebait and pedosperging

No. 15118

>>15116
A lot of a-logging is going on at /ot/ too

No. 15119

>>15118
Ban evader and shitposter in /w/ is posting again. I feel like the people given out bans might've had them right up already.

No. 15120

>>15119
In /w/? Excuse my autism but I can't find any recent shitposts there that aren't redtexted

No. 15121

>>15118
>a-logging
board culture*

No. 15122

>>15121
If you weren't a newfag you would know that you can get banned for a-logging but sure, blame board culture for your shittiness

No. 15123

>>15122
I can show you examples from 10 years ago from 4chan archives, people weren't banned back then

No. 15124

>>15123
this isn't 4chan tho

No. 15125

>>15123
this isn't 4chan and has always had it's own culture

No. 15126

>>15125
t. newfag

No. 15127

>>15126
loosen up your helmet's straps and you might just think of a better comeback

No. 15128

>>15126
I've been here since 2014… i know it's an of shoot of an of shoot of cgl but it has always had it's own culture and a-logging has always been against the rules

No. 15129

>>15127
>comeback
I'm nta, you need to take a break from this site anon

No. 15130

>>15126
>no u
Bless your heart anon. At least you tried!

No. 15131

>>15130
Again anon, I'm nayrt but keep samefagging I'm sure it'll work

No. 15132

>>15129
the point still stands, turbo tard

>>15131
what's up with all the people screeching S-SAMEFAG!!1! recently? is it that shocking that people don't agree with you? oldfag my ass

No. 15134

>>15133
Could a farmhand please do something about the rabid sex workers in the stupid questions thread?

No. 15137

>>15134
>Every woman who doesn't hate men and herself as much as I do must be a sex worker
Get off the fucking site

No. 15138

>>15134
Why do you never sage? I don't mean on here but on /ot/

No. 15139

bring back tempcow

No. 15140

>>15015
will you ever destroy the kpop threads? The rest of /m/ is innocent

No. 15141

we really can't say the word nigger, even when it has nothing to do with race? is faggot off limits too?

No. 15142

File: 1590687553584.gif (1.9 MB, 312x250, Average anonymoose member.gif)

>>15141
are you by any chance the anon who was on the LSA and celebricows thread posting racebait posts and then going on how you like to call people niggers?

if so, im pretty sure its not because of the word "nigger"… its because youre really bad at baiting and come off edgy.

No. 15143

>>15142
nah i only posted once in the LSA thread and i don't really care for celebricows. i've never seen someone get banned for calling an obvious newfag a nig nog faggot so idk what's the problem here

No. 15144

>>15143
most likely their post history is full of cancer and race related posts.

No. 15145

>>15143
Where was the ban, anon

No. 15146

>>15144
i'm the anon who got banned lol. my post history is cringey but i don't remember being racist. i guess mods are being overly suspicious now with all the raiding

>>15145
in the LSA thread, redflagged for racebait

No. 15147

>>15146
So you've been racebaiting/baiting in general. Post history is checked for a post like that

No. 15148

>>15147
why would i bother coming here to complain about my ban if it was the case

No. 15149

>>15148
So you can try and bait some more and plant false flags to shit up the site even more?

No. 15150

>>15140
As someone who has all the Kpop threads permanently hidden and knows nothing about Kpop, what's wrong with them? I'm just curious how the thread is this controversial when it's about teeny bop idol music.

No. 15151

can a farmhand please tell all the morons in taylor nicole deans thread to stfu about syd and jonny? theyve been shitting up the thread ever since the milk dried up and nothing is getting done about it

No. 15152

>>15149
your tinfoiling is already shitting up the site(ban evasion, your post history had prior bait, derailing and racebait.)

No. 15153

>>15150
28-year-old women with preventative botox and fillers go there to sperg. It's brilliant and milky

No. 15154

>>15153
I thought you were joking but I looked at the thread and can't stop laughing. Thanks, anon. My sides.

No. 15155

>>15150
it's completely autistic and attracts so many twitterfags who use that thread to praise their faves and attack anyone who dares to criticize them. the newfaggotry is always so huge too, none of them sage or they also pick a lot of fights that are like:
>i like (insert famous person)!
>omg shut up faggot no one likes ur fave lol they are retarded lol kek kek kek
>have u guys seen (insert idol)'s music?
>yea it's garbage u retard

also so many of them use kek in every post, i feel like it's a bunch of newfags forcing themselves to say it so it looks like they're one of "us"

No. 15156

>>15155
Yeah, i really don't like the concept of these completely seperate communities existing here, this is for lolcows and if they want to kpopsperg they can do it on another site

No. 15157

Please do something about the pedo drawings in the art thread, jesus they are very bad. Like, extremely.
All of them look like actual children. Please, just tell them not to post shit that looks like it's traced from an actual little girls naked body.

No. 15158

>>15157
it's spoiled so whats the problem? would you rather have anon post the links instead?

No. 15159

>>15158
Nta but stop trying to debate it. If it's that sort of material, it shouldn't be uploaded even if it's under the guise of "Look at how gross this is!" We've already had an influx of strange questions of the same theme in /ot/ and it's not a tinfoil at this stage to think that there's something not quite right with any of it

No. 15160

>>15158
that person posting them just kept going and going and going with the art instead of posting one so we all know how bad it is and dipping

No. 15161

>>15159
i really dont understand what you're getting at. are you saying that the anon who posted the pics is a pedophile?

No. 15162

>>15161
I'm not accusing anon of anything because i don't care, I'm saying we really should not have the material on here regardless of what intention it was posted with because of the type of person it attracts

No. 15163

>>15159
I honestly think it's some pedo since they have been saying they have been following him for a while. Maybe it is a pedo wanting to flaunt their degeneracy under the guise of "hey guys, isnt this so bad? look, ill show u more"

No. 15164

>>15162
i doubt ppl will come to lolcow for their daily consumption of cp

No. 15165

>>15164
At this stage you're baiting. It's not acceptable to have it on this site.

No. 15166


No. 15167

>>15003
Uhm to any sane person that would be something to mock yes?

No. 15168

Before /kpg/ gets locked again and/or banned entirely, please hand out some bans so the Twitter bunch doesn't spread to the rest of LC. As someone mentioned, there's no attempt at integration whatsoever and the amount of infighting is ridiculous.

No. 15169

>>15168
Even though I post in there from time to time, I second this 100%

No. 15170

It says in the /ot/ sticky that starting shit over topics you don't want discussed gets infighting tag, but it literally never gets enforced? Every time a celebrity is mention there's several people demanding they're not discussed and start shit with people discussing it and they don't get banned. Doja Cat and the matrix directors are the latest example.

Someone is trying to start shit in the reddit thread now because they don't like the subreddit being discussed. I honestly give up posting on /ot/ because whatever you bring up has some sad bitch trying to start a fight so you stop discussing their fav.

No. 15171


No. 15172

>>15170
then leave. no one gives a fuck that you got your feelings hurt in /ot/

No. 15173

>>15170
Who's saying we cant talk about doja? She's all anyone's been talking about and people defending her =/= people saying we can't talk about her.

No. 15174

>>15170
If you don't want to be baited and get assblasted over it stop posting in /ot/. People are banned but not always redtexted to make you feel better about losing your infight

No. 15175

>>15173
Agreed I've seen no one say she shouldn't be talked about and I was following the celebricows thread pretty closely during all that

No. 15176

I feel intimidated by the brazilian anons.

No. 15181

>>15176
Care to elaborate?

No. 15182

>>15181
Anon made it very clear. The brazilians are unwanted, intimidating, shitting up literally every board and need their own containment website

No. 15183

>>15182
How in the hell did they end up here in the first place?

No. 15184

>>15183
I have no idea but we need them out now. Town hall should be called and clear redtexting in their dedicated containment thread

No. 15185

>>15182
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who feels this way.

No. 15186

>>15185
Thanks anon, I think it's interesting how they seem to avoid redtext for near constant rule-breaking/derailing. It's looking more and more like there's a Brazilian among the farmhands and admin's silence about the Brazilian raids is deafening

No. 15187

Can you ban twitter/tumblr slang and all-lowercase posters?

No. 15188

>>15187
>All-lowercase posters
This is a ridiculous request, anon

No. 15189

>>15187
Seconded.

No. 15190

>>15152
i'm ban evading bc i got a ridiculous ban. i might have derailed and ~baited~ in the past but racebait? i don't remember doing that at all. did i offend you with one of my posts? did i make fun of your husbando and now you're taking it out on me?

No. 15191

>>15190
So continue to ban evade? Why are you in here trying to win an unwinnable argument with the farmhans, exposing your new ip and then needing to ban evade again? Put this in the appeal section if you're this assblasted about your deserved ban but thinking you deserve a response after admitting to ban evasion is laughable

No. 15192

>>15191
the farmhands won't even answer bc they're sleeping rn. i'm here bc i'm bored, wassup

No. 15193

>>15192
judging by their patron there is 14 of them all across the world so no, some of them aren't

No. 15194

>>15192
Hey. Was it a permaban or just a really long one?

No. 15195

>>15193
Well then they're busy fingering themselves because I haven't seen a redtext all day

No. 15196

>>15195
I giggled.

No. 15197

>>15188
I agree. tf kind of request is that?

No. 15198

>>15197
there's someone (or multiple people I guess?) who recently keeps complaining about lowercase posts. I've seen them post this exact thing multiple times this week in various /ot/ threads but it's strange because people have always typed in lowercase so I don't get why they would suddenly care?

No. 15199

>>15198
it's just another "hi _____" accusation to lob at an anon but it's funny that their paranoia has gotten this bad that they genuinely think typing in lowercase is enough indication of an unintegrated twitterfag to post about it in /meta/. i've noticed it as well and every time it's brought up, multiple farmers chime in and say they frequently switch up their case or just are on laptop and are too lazy to capslock and yet it's brought up again and again somehow hoping that if they say it enough times, people will start infighting all lowercase posters like they want but it's such a bizarre vendetta. at this stage you can bait by just posting in lowercase. people seem to not be able to comprehend that there are many farmers who type in lowercase and accuse clearly different posts of samefagging just because they have this "totally unique" typing style. it's on the level of accusing all posters who type in british english as samefag and is honestly entertaining

No. 15200

>>15199
Yeah I think that's exactly what it is. It really is an extremely bizarre vendetta though, we seem to in general have a very paranoid and tinfoily userbase (or at least a vocal minority) but this lowercase thing is another level.

No. 15201

>>15184
lmao townhalls aren't "called" whenever someone is buttblasted
>>15200
You ever notice how all the whiny anons are usually just from /ot/ unless they're the crying nicole whiteknight from /w/? Nobody else cares.

No. 15202

>>15201
Yes they are, lurk moar newfag

No. 15203

>>15202
Nope, they're not, ((oldfag)).

No. 15204

>>15203
>((oldfag))
learn how to integrate bud

No. 15205

>>15202
You think a townhall gets called every time some sperg comes to /meta/ to complain about something like seeing a lowercase post and not liking it?

No. 15206

>>15203
Okay new fag, sage you're shit maybe?(bait)

No. 15207

>>15205
We were talking about those darn brazilians.

No. 15208

>>15205
Yes, a townhall is called every time a significant number of users have a complaint about an issue that affects the site. Again, lurk more

No. 15209

>>15201
Why does everyone care about this Nicole girl and if I remember right mods handled the anon who kept sperging out and claiming admin is biased. The OP of that thread with the 2 other posters nitpicking is as bad as the other anon, if not worse. Asking for proof vs complaining about having to provide proof in threads is autistic as fuck.

No. 15210

Very telling that the thread gets derailed as soon as the Brazilian problem is brought up.

No. 15211

>>15210
The brazilians are at it again. No but seriously, who the fuck are they?

No. 15212

>>15211
I thought these were memes.

No. 15213

>>15211
Read upthread anon, the Brazilians have been consistently derailing and trying to infight board-wide for a while now and farmhands are either not banning them or haven't given out a single red text, none of their posts have been deleted and there has been radio silence about the entire thing. There have been speculations about Brazilian farmhands and I'm starting to believe it. All it takes is simple communication about a site-wide problem. I saw a redtext for "responding to bait" but the Brazilian anon themself seemed to stay in the thread, however this is might be a tinfoil as there are just so many of them. Brazilians have infiltrated the discord despite voice verification requiring all users to say a few phrases to determine if they have a Brazilian accent which leads me to believe that they're having a native English speaker stand in for them to get verification in order to bait, fight and outright spam on the discord, too. Lolcow has literally never seen a raid of this scale before. I'm oldfag, I've been on this site for 15 years and I have never seen a raid of this scale before. Old admin would have never enabled the Brazilians in the first place but here we are and as expected, radio silence about the whole thing. It's a damn shame, as I said before I've been on this site for nearly 30 years now but I guess I've outgrown this place and its shitty moderation.

Adeus a todos.(bait, ban evading)

No. 15214

>>15213
Bye, I'll miss you anon. (no sarcasm)

No. 15216

>>15213
Bitch tf 30 years? Ain't you got hip medication to take instead of being up this late?

No. 15217

>>15216
Drag her, sis!(ban evading )

No. 15218

>>15216
Mind your own fucking business

No. 15220

BRING
BACK
GENDER-CRIT

No. 15221

>>15220
TWANNY
TWANNY
TWANNY

No. 15222

>>15220
>>15221
>mfw people will look at this obvious fucking false-flag samefagging and claim it's t-the pp spergs at it again

No. 15223

>>15222
Lmao anon, backtracking already? We can tell that this was a "false flag" planted by a radfem/femcel to make it look like everyone's out to get them and contribute to their big victim complex. I wish they'd get off the fucking site

No. 15225

Why do radfems only start posting when I'm just waking up lmao

No. 15226

>>15225
they're the same people sperging out at a certain hour.

No. 15227

can the mods just close down kpg again lol it seems like the entire thread has just been derailed and taken over by ban evading twitterfags

any attempt at restarting conversation just ends up with more infighting, the thread is honestly cancer and beyond saving at this point

No. 15228

sorry to bring this up again but the kpop thread is a mess of infighting and newfags, please lock it, at least until people get bored and forget about it. It's clogging up /m/

No. 15230

>>15227
Seconded, the active thread list is just shat up with "bruh", "mmk" and various emoji replies, the media is just full of videos of kpop guys, it's not bringing any worthwhile users onto the site and is shitting it up for actual farmers

No. 15231

>>15230
Are you the same anon who thinks lowcase = newfag? If so, kys.

No. 15232

File: 1590780654730.jpg (10.67 KB, 407x112, test.jpg)

>>15227
>>15228
>>15230
They're having the ultimate Lolcow Knowledge Test over there, cannot believe we're about to have some Ph.D. graduates.

No. 15233

>>15230
mmmh is a twitter thing now since when
damn twitter really invented everything

No. 15234

>>15231
Take off the tinfoil hat, schizo-chan

No. 15235

>>15232
it's literally the same two or three ban evading twitterfags who keep fighting among themselves and starting shit lol

one of them found this thread too >>15233

No. 15236

>>15235
How are they knowledgeable enough to ban evade but they still can't stop posting emojis?

No. 15237

>>15235
i've been here for three years but yes, everyone who disagrees with you is either
a) samefag
b) scrote
c) troon
d) twitterfag

No. 15238

>>15237
regardless, the thread is a mess.

No. 15239

>>15237
>i've been here for three years
Then why are you still failing to integrate? The most you've done is lurk maybe once a month for 3 years which doesn't mean you've been actually using the site(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 15241

>>15238
i know, that's why i told y'all to stop repeating LOCK THE THREAD and bring your complaints here

>>15236
jesus christ dude

>>15239
i will keep talking like a surfer dude no matter what, you nazi conformist bitch(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 15242

>>15227
>>15228
>>15230
What do you want? Do you want me to lock until the political discussion dies down on Twitter or something? These migrants won't leave until it does.

No. 15243

>>15242
Nuke /m/. I know you want to.

No. 15244

>>15242
yeah that sounds good. let them sperg on twitter instead of shitting up threads here.

No. 15245

>>15243
Seconded. It has been long overdue.

No. 15246

>>15242
if you don't get rid of the kpop threads then i'm sure this will keep repeating itself over and over

>open kpop thread

>people complain about newfaggotry, infighting, etc.
>lock it for a while
>open it again
>>people complain about newfaggotry, infighting, etc.
>lock it for a while
>open kpop thread
>repeat

way better to completely nuke it and never open one ever again than continue dealing with it

No. 15247

>>15243
I do. But I would never be able to forgive myself if I went against Admin-sama's will.

>>15244
Fine.

No. 15248

>>15247
Could you do something about the dumbass shit thread in /ot/? And will hi pick-me be banned, like hi scrote, hi radfem and hi troon?

No. 15249

>>15246
ive used the kpop thread a lot and i agree too, its just a vicious cycle of the same group of twitterfags losing their shit and fighting amongst themselves

i honestly cant tell if its the same two or three idiots ban evading (one literally boasted she was ban evading yesterday) or if its just an entire toxic migration of shitty twitter fangirls going full sperg because theyre anonymous

No. 15250

>>15249
I used to enjoy reading through them but they just keep devolving and I would rather they go away.

>>15247
thank you

No. 15251

File: 1590782130659.gif (967.76 KB, 500x250, XaAd.gif)

>>15247
Thank you based farmhand.

No. 15252

>>15248
>Could you do something about the dumbass shit thread in /ot/?
Yes. Did something new come up? It's only been half an hour since I checked the reports. Remember to report anything that you think needs banning.

>And will hi pick-me be banned, like hi scrote, hi radfem and hi troon?

Most likely. I'll ask admin about it whenever I get the chance.

No. 15254

>>15252
Honestly just ban hi everything, anons accusing other anons to be something or someone will always happen so just ban that.

No. 15255

>>15254
Can we as well as anons who keep low-key baiting and calling anyone with a different opinion a whiteknight or newfag/oldfag? It's just trash post after post without saging from them and it's just fucking with thread quality.

No. 15256

>>15254
>>15255
I totally see your point and have noticed this scourge as anyone who uses /ot/ has but you can't seriously want to ban hi everything? I don't think it's a good idea for /ot/ to become that heavily policed. People disagree and insult each other online, hi ___ is just a part of that. Removing so many terms isn't going to do anything, the people who want to call others stupid shit will do it regardless of a ban. It's about shutting someone down with an accusation, not genuine belief you're a scrote or troon. >>15255 is even worse. How the hell are you going to define low-key baiting? There are actual whiteknights and newfags on this site who deserve to be called out so they can integrate better. I'm not seeing the unsaged posts (apart from over at /m/) and it seems to me anyway like these posters are bored shitposting but otherwise integrated farmers who've been using the site for a while who do sage.

No. 15257

>>15256
It causes infighting and then 20 posts because people take bait no matter what. You can tell them not to and they do or they bring ing friends and anon each other, samefagging, pretending to cause infighting. It's completely derailing as hell. Why would you even want to hi people aside from bait? It's like the anons who say you're racist when you aren't because they are trying to cause shit. Same with whiteknighting, calling people oldfags/newfags more than once. heavier moderation on it at least. It's so irritating to go into threads and everyone is bumped with 'whiteknight newfag'

No. 15258

>>15256
It's slow right now, but wait until the weekend and you see /w/ being bumped constantly by nitpicking anons who get mad when called out and yell 'whiteknight' because of it and throw tantrums. It's all over the board. Not just /ot/ or /m/.

No. 15259

>>15257
Fair enough, I'm sorry if it seemed personal, I just really value a lack of censorship but the problems you're bringing up are definitely noticeable. I'd love any solution that isn't banning words but if push comes to shove I guess it'll have to be done. You're right, people take bait, baiters take bait so people scream at them for taking bait, it's a dumpster fire.
>>15258
That's true about /w/, is it unintegrated PULLfags or just stupidity from farmers that has been allowed to fester?

No. 15260

>>15259
It's just the same across the site. Twitterfags, kids here trying to reach for milk when there isn't any just for the thrill of gossiping. It's just ridiculous. The nitpicking is the worse.

No. 15261

>>15256
This. It would only further support traffic from other websites to not integrate. If 'hi x' is derailing and clogging up a thread, it can be reported.

No. 15262

>>15243
>>15247
No pls. The rest of /m/ save the kpop sperging is innocent and doesn't deserve this. Let us keep our filthy shipping, Chinese cartoons, and fujoshi threads.

No. 15263

Also I literally don't give a fuck about trannies or radfems but I do think it's obvious that some people are baiting and shitting up the board. Can we start banning people who also reply to bait? We used to ban people who replied to obvious robot/incel bait, please start doing that again. The only way the shitposting will stop is if people stop replying.

No. 15264

>>15263
This. It would never have gotten to this level if bans were handed out for taking bait in the first place. Someone just has to say "pickme" or "radfem" in any thread on /ot/ and we're guaranteed an infight with multiple anons involved every time

No. 15265

>>15264
Seriously. You can tell when someone is baiting but nothing is done until there is a derail a mile long complaining about the baiting.

No. 15266

Thank you for locking the kpop thread, maybe the stans will make their own board in the same vein as asherah's garden.

No. 15267

Thank you for locking the kpop thread but please don't ever bring it back.

No. 15268

>>15267
Bringing it back at this stage would be a complete pisstake and people are going to continue to bait newfags in there to get it locked again. The site has already voted on whether they want it or not.

No. 15269

>>15268
Have them go to their own forums. I'm sure there is a kpop one.

No. 15270

aaaah finally we're getting rid of the kpoppies i ♥ you farmhand thanks

No. 15271

>>15270
I love that they approved the ♥

No. 15272

>>15271
i used to include ♥ a lot in my posts before it got approved so i like to think that it's because of me teehee

No. 15273

>>15272
♥ based anon ♥

No. 15274

>>15271
>>15272
>>15273
the ♥ is definitely good. imo any japanese emojis and ascii art shit should be fine since it developed on image boards in the first place the american style ":)" and any of those are crappy anyway.

No. 15275

>>15274
>:)
>american style
???

No. 15277

>>15249
>>15250
I dont use twitter at all and use this /m for getting kpop info and lurking. Kinda sad it's locked because i'm not sure where else to do that isnt filled with twitter fags and children to keep up to date on kpop stuff.

No. 15279

>>15276
Google kpop forums. Unfortunately its full of kids and they are what closed the thread. You can't escape them. Welcome to kpop hell. You don't get to enjoy it.

No. 15280

>>15277
>>15279
Same. It'd be nice if someone made a separate kpop board.

No. 15281

>>15280
>>15277
Just follow @OH_mes2 on twitter and a couple of multistan girl group fans and you'll get all the news and tea without the oppalogist filter. Kpop forums are worse than stan twitter.

No. 15282

>>15281
>multistan girlgroup fans
Anon, you live like that? I'd rather kill myself than follow even one of those insufferable cunts, or that old creep oh_mes. Pick a blackpink member and follow some of her akgaes instead. You get to see a talented pretty girl every day, just as much info about 'uge happenings in the community without having to suffer through a bunch of nugu gg bloat, a free front row seat to blinkers' autistic internal fan wars, and on top of all of it the pinks are easy to keep up with since they are tragically NEET. Infinitely more entertaining.

No. 15284

>>15280
>>15279

It would be nice. I actually liked a lot of the anons who were posting in the thread. I lurked mostly to see what was up and i wouldnt have known about some current releases without the info. It's really only the twitter invasion that ruined it, but that sucks that a few bad apples had to ruin it for everyone. I know some anons complain about the kpop thread, but i always hide the threads i hate and ignore them. There's really no place for a good kpop discussion and critique, and i'm not kissing any idol's asses. I like both views.

No. 15285

>>15284
just fuck off to twitter, mate. its not all ass kissing and fancams. make some friends there instead of relying on the kpg retards, you'll find that they have worse takes than a lot of stantwitfags anyways.

honestly I always roll my eyes at the "there's LITERALLY no where else to sperg about kpop w/o getting ASSASSINATED!" shit. makes you sound like a bunch of rejects.

No. 15286

>>15284
i agree, but unfortunately the creation of any kpop board/opening up the old thread will just attract the twitterfag spergs who ruin it whenever their fave is "targeted"

the critique and discussion was honestly the best here, its harder on twitter because you have to find certain pockets and most of the time its hard to discuss groups/culture as a whole

either way im glad the threads got killed since it became so hard to hold a conversation while the same three or four stans just continously fought and ban evaded despite being told to stop

it kind of sucks that a couple spergs ruined the thing for everyone else, but thats just how kpop is lol, so im glad the thread's dead

No. 15287

is this the new /kpg/?

No. 15288

Reporting people claiming 'wk wk wk' and trying to infight because people don't agree if cause for reporting under 'infighting, baiting, and derailing' right? I'm so fuckig tired of these twitter newfags throwing fits when people don't agree with them and suddenly they want to derail about how much of a whiteknight you are. These threads are fucking miserable now. Did they all leave PULL and come here too?

No. 15289

>>15288
Amen anon, twitterfaggotry is horrific and it's even worse when they call you a "new fag" when you politely try to steer them in another direction because they're literally shitting up a thread. I'm backreading a thread in /g/ that was only posted a year ago and it's a brilliant thread and board culture is adhered to throughout the thread, making it a brilliant read, and we've fallen far from even a year ago. Half of these active threads are unreadable due to sperging from twitterfags

No. 15290

>>15285
>you'll find that they have worse takes than a lot of stantwitfags anyways.
So this is what it is about.

No. 15292

The TND thread could really benefit from autosage or something until she comes back. For weeks it’s been nothing but infighting and posts about Syd and Johnny, because Taylor is not active online right now, and now it’s turning into a big argument about protests.

No. 15293

For some reason the ship thread in /m/ shows up twice, once in the first page and once in the second page

No. 15295

The moids are here. Already reported.
>>561562

No. 15296

>>15243
>>15247
Please don’t punish the rest of us who aren’t kpoppies.

No. 15297

>>15295
is it over? can i browse the rest of the imageboard safely?

No. 15299

>>15296
>>15297
What happened? I don't see anything (so yeah I assume whatever it was is over?).

No. 15300

>>15299
scrote raid. i saw a human skull being carved so i ran away

No. 15301

>>15300
Not only that but in /g/ there were a bunch of "you're an idiot" memes and in /m/ they posted an anime girl in a wheelchair with an erect dick and scat hentai. Haha so funny.

No. 15302

Why is the tinfoil thread even a thing? It's filled with homophobic and racist christfags.

No. 15303

>>15301
The spam of gore and shock images really does it make feel like we have a bunch of 13-year old teenage edgelord boys trying to commit an le ebic raid. Embarrassing.

No. 15304

>>15303
I think it's just bots at this point, judging by the weird namefagging.

No. 15305

>>15304
Nope, it's some weird faggot who thinks he's hurting the "EPIC FEMALE CHAN!!!11!!1!". He once bragged about how banning isn't effective, because he has a lot of proxies/VPNS or some shit. Googling the namefagging linked me to an abandoned Twitter, don't know if it's him but it had that "meme edgelord" tune to it.

No. 15306

>>15300
fuck, I'm sorry you had to see that anon

No. 15307

pls ban the crytyping troll

No. 15308

>>15307
what thread?

No. 15309

>>15308
Not just one thread in /ot/

No. 15310

Farmhands pls a tranny deleted their post >>>/ot/561095 and I wanna know what they wrote pls show me what it was

No. 15311

I accidentally used my email on a post when I was new to the site, now I’m very anxious that my address is exposed and I’d like to know if there’s any way to get it deleted

No. 15312

Also I want to add, can you guys redtext the term POC?

No. 15313

>>15310
>>15311
>>15312
>>15307
Don't waste our time with these requests when there are bigger matters like gore, thanks. Use the report feature.

No. 15315

>>15313
unbased.

No. 15317

>>15313

I’m just asking a question, which is what this thread is for.
I’m genuinely worried and just want to know if reporting my own post would result in deleting it.

No. 15318

>>15317
Nothing gets deleted but you have 30 minutes to delete the post if it's still up. It's a newfag error if you typed in your email.

No. 15319

>>15318
Thank you, I’ll be more careful from now on

No. 15320

>>15313
>If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.

No. 15321

>>15320
they haven't spoken up for a long time and now they're telling us to shut the fuck up lmao

No. 15322

>>15320
>farmhand I wanna see a hi troon post!!
>pls ban the troll even though I could have used the report feature
>pls redtext this word I don't like
>omg help I'm a retard that posted my own email

No. 15323

>>15322
Maybe the OP should be more specific next time. If it bothers you don't read meta.

No. 15324

>>15322
>If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.
>Do not use this thread to infight and instigate pointless arguments.
You don't get to decide what's important and what's not, minimod.

No. 15326


No. 15327

Gore will be immediately deleted anyways so what's the point of coming here to talk about it?

>>15326
I don't like her, she called me ugly.

No. 15328

>>15319
pro tip: if you say you're ham chan you'll get your posts deleted lol

No. 15330

>>15329
what are your posts

No. 15331

My derailment ban didn't make any sense? Like I wasn't even derailing ,I even pointed out that talking about it further would be derailing and went back on topic. Not only that but I only posted once? Are you guys just banning anyone in a conversation now? I'm confused. We were discussing a screenshot too so that makes me extra confused.

No. 15332

>>15331
did you post in the dumbass thread?

No. 15333

>>15332
No it was the idol thread. They were discussing a screenshot and I said the history the girl was talking about was true since people seemed confused but then I mentioned that I don't wanna further explain cause it would then derail. The. I went on to say I was surprised that idols would talk about political stuff. I'd screenshot but but my phone is being stupid.

No. 15334

Cant we have a hellweek where name calling is banned? No more twitterfag/newfag/femcel/etc. This site is literally the spiderman meme but with newfag now.

No. 15335

>>15334
Seconded, ‘hi newfag’ especially is becoming extremely annoying and derailing

No. 15336

There was a ban from 2019 for 'vivaldi-chan'. Who is vivaldi-chan?

No. 15338


No. 15339

At this point the whole Venus angelic thread should be put to pasture.
Her simps and whiteknights are going crazy there.

No. 15341

>>15335
'youre a whiteknight' too is just over with. Fucking kids come in here after only reading headlines and when oldfags call them out all they do is cream and derail. s

No. 15342

>>15339
You guys saying she is pedobaiting aren't any better. Mods already said to stop talking about that. The nitpicking in there is crazy with people saying 'she is editing herself as a child'. You guys are seriously no fucking better. You sound retarded as hell.

No. 15343

>>15339
are you sure you're not one of her wk trying to lock her thread?

No. 15345

>>15342
That thread should be put on autosage for quite some times. Maybe it would discourage simps and newfags unable to use the catalog. Idk. That "e-thot saga" isn't even that funny imo. But to each their own I guess.

I don't wanna sound antagonizing or anything (pardon my Esl ass) but I don't understand why Venus have a pass for everything she does. I know she have a shit upbringing with Crazy-Marge but the same thing can be say about a lot of cows and flakes.
When someone like Shay (Dolly Mattel) does pedo-pandering and even exposed her younger audience to porn through her stoner blog in the past, almost everyone here agrees that it's irresponsible and gross. But when Venus does the exact same stuff, there's huge influx of apologists (and their antipedo spergs counterpart) derailing the thread endlessly. Why some anons are so nice with her but very harsh with other cows?

No. 15346

>>15345
No one is giving her a pass, but we don't need to keep bringing up old milk when it gets slow to try and bring traffic to the page. Not to mention the pedospergs who think erasing wrinkles on someone who already has a small body makes her trying to pedobait. Keep merge in her own thread. No one fucking cares about her in Venus's thread. Margo did it because she was couch surfing and a fucking slag. Venus at least has somewhere to live and something, lucrative, to call a job. They are doing it two completely different ways. You all need to just wait for her to do something milky because I get talking about her photos, but dragging it on and derailing into 'well I think because she editing it this way that pedos will garner to her and her old fans shes soooOOoo mean to them waaaaa'.

You're shitting up the thread. She isn't responsible for her audience of kids who can't deal with her doing sexy shit. They can unfollow. Infact, their parents are at fault.

No. 15347

>>15307
I seconded the crytyping anon being permabanned.

No. 15348

>>15347
They're ban evading.

No. 15349

>>15347
*second
>>15348
wtf

No. 15350

The protest thread is a dumpster fire. I don't know what else to say.

No. 15351

Already reported but can mods do something about idiots trying to racebait please in the protest thread? Thanks.

No. 15352

I'm so sick and tired of the instant "this isn't milk" or "this person isn't milky / a cow" that happens when anything is brought up anywhere.
Does this count as mini-modding, and should it be reported? It also seems to derail any discussion because anons just end up fighting about whether this person is or isn't worthy of being discussed.

No. 15353

>>15352
Maybe post milk and make it recent instead of posting old shit and nitpicking it apart when no actual drama is happening. Who the hell wants an old thread of someone not relevant enough right now? lol No one fucking cares about your topic then, anon.

No. 15354

>>15353
nta but no, the "no milk" thing is an annoying form of white knighting.

No. 15355

>>15354
Give an example of the post then. Let meta decide lol

No. 15356

Woke anon in the protests thread is seething about a twitterfag and keeps spamming his pics

No. 15357

>>15353
I've never made a thread and mostly just lurk instead of post. It's just very tiring reading bickering back and forth, even if I agree or disagree with whatever side. If it's boring and stale drama, it'll fizzle out, or someone will come in with something new and interesting and the discussion will turn to that.
Fighting about something so subjective like whether or not something is funny, relevant, or interesting is an unwinnable argument and just fills up the thread with boring and bitter posts for everyone else to slog through.
What I posted wasn't really in reference to new threads either, I'm talking more like a "general" style thread where multiple people are being discussed.

No. 15358

>>15357
Dude, the rules of the thread involve bumping with relevant stuff that in response to relevant posts. Go to 4chan if you just want to spam stuff to have a giggle because a thread is slow and has no milk. So tired of you piss babies complaining about the rules we have. If the thread involves multiple topics and anons call you out, why keep fighting back about wanting to talk about something? Go to PULL for that.

There are better places you can be than lolcow if you want to be mad about this nitpicking.

No. 15359

>>15358
Again, I'm a lurker, not a poster. You're deliberately misreading my posts to somehow make it about spam when what I said has nothing to do with that. I'm talking about when someone mentions relevant, currently occurring drama and an anon tries to shut it down because it isn't personally interesting or funny to them.

No. 15360

>>15359
NTA, I agree with you. It's one thing to report what looks like a milkless vendetta/nitpick post but to try and tell anons what is and isn't milky seems like minimodding to me as well.

No. 15361

>>15353
>>15358
This. People come here to start a thread on some bitch they have a vendetta against and the only milk is that she's a photoshopping e-thot begging for money and there are more than plenty of that here, instead of posting their dry ass powdered "milk" to some general/thread request thread they want a horde of farmers joining their spergout right away. We don't need to cultivate a shitty userbase even more by allowing this kind of retardation, allowing extensive nitpicking and tinfoiling just for the sake of bumping the thread attracts people who would be cows themselves if there was a thread on them.

No. 15362

>>15357
>If it's boring and stale drama, it'll fizzle out
It won’t though, people will keep going in milkless threads nitpicking for literally years. This is what happened with Berry and then Anisa.

I think there are a lot of people thinking they can just post any public person they want to discuss but this isn’t PULL or gurugossiper, the person is supposed to be an actual cow with some kind of milk and a lot of the people being posted recently really aren’t, ‘general’ threads especially seem to have this problem.

No. 15363

>>15362
anon there's a huge difference between milk and interesting milk. some things that are milk to you aren't milk to others and vice versa, but all of that isn't vandetta-chans just because you don't like the thread content.

No. 15364

>>15363
I agree, but a lot of the threads being posted recently are objectively neither and it seems like nit-picking rules aren't really being enforced. In the rules it says for someone to be posted they must have
>A documented history of bizarre behavior displayed online
but a lot of the people just have an online presence but nothing bizarre or milky in their history at all.

No. 15365

>>15345
There‘s a huge difference between Shay‘s and Venus‘ behavior though.
Shay will literally call herself baby/child and force herself into this role with such energy no matter what. She’ll even use pacifiers and all. And for her it’s just that; an act for porn.
Venus has the behavior and manners of a child or child-like person 24/7. She doesn’t exclusively does it for porn, the whole shtick has become her actual personality to some extent. It’s not something she does for porn.

Also, Shay is a hypocrite on top of it, talking about how people should keep content about children out of their NSFW accounts, posting pictures of her underaged self and continue calling herself baby bimbo.

That’s basically why what Shay does is legitimate pedo-pandering and what Venus does is … just questionable, imo.

But definitely pro autosaging the thread. Ideally permanently.
Whenever I take a look, it’s the same:
90% is people fighting about whether Marge or Venus is worse, whether Venus has used Manaki or vice versa, armchairing about why she turned out this way, people whining about how everyone’s so mean, and 10% is new content. It won’t change.

No. 15366

Legit no point in having the protest thread if no one is actually posting anything of substance. It's literally eurofags sperging about Americans, Americans being Americans and everyone's racebaiting.

No. 15367

There's child porn in /g/ wtf

No. 15368

>>15367
This happens every time /pol/ threads are bumping here I think.

No. 15369

Can a farmhand close the old Onision thread so that people aren’t posting in two threads for him? Please thank you.

And also, can the banner for the May 22 Town Hall go away now?

No. 15370

Already reported but derailing, infighting and racebait in protest thread, seems like the same people starting shit over and over again.

No. 15371

>>15370
The thread should be locked.

No. 15372

>>15371
I have literally no idea why it was ever allowed, LSA was iffy but at least there's milk there, a riot general is begging for racebaiting

No. 15373

>>15370
I hope they've banned the tards. I personally enjoyed the thread prior.. It was informative if anything

No. 15374

what are the chances of the kpop thread coming back? or what is an actual alternative since onehallyu is also gonezo

No. 15375

>>15374
What are the chances of you shutting the fuck up?

No. 15376

Can someone create a separate protests/riots thread for burgerfags? The infighting is so annoying and I don’t want to have to take my ass to /pol/.

No. 15377

>>15376
no. the protest thread was literally made for americans, it's weird that you guys care so much. and even if your suggestion wasn't completely retarded, learn to make your own thread newfag

No. 15378

>>15376
Why would you even ask this in meta?

No. 15379

>>15376
The protests started in America. Everyone not American in there is complaining about the attention the protests are garnering so I'm not sure why you want a thread for non Americans. Go to pol if that's where you will feel more comfortable. There's Americans there too though.

No. 15380

>>15378
I don’t know where else to ask. I didn’t want to post in the thread request in /pt/ because… /pt/.
>>15377
>>15379
Am a burgerfag myself. I want a thread for us only. I’m not a newfag either.

No. 15381

>>15380
Yes you are

No. 15382

>>15381
Stop.

No. 15383

>>15379
>snowflake americancer
They’re also here in the Netherlands protesting, never seen such a big protest in my life before.

I think there needs to be a political discussion thread where no race baiting/incel edge is allowed. Though tbh that’s inevitable since politics only invites that from all spectrums in the political scale.

No. 15384

Is Admin-chan single?

No. 15385

>>15384
Admin-chan slits her wrists, you don't want her as your gf

No. 15386

>>15385
They were old scars. I hope she's doing better now.

No. 15387

File: 1591181852319.jpg (10.43 KB, 600x338, D261_8_066_0004_600.jpg)

>>15386
Obviously not if she's a lolcow admin. She probably cuts lengthways now.

No. 15388

>>15376
There shouldn't be a protest thread in the first place. I remember a few months ago when an argument to remove certain threads was that "lolcow is not a website for political discussion". But that doesn't seem to count for riots/protests, left-wing reddits, north korean dictators, political tinfoils or pieces of serious political discussion in the vent/dumbass/confession/unpopular opinion threads.

No. 15389

>>15388
If it's a once-off like "holy fuck france just beheaded another dictator" then it's not unreasonable but it's hard to define when it gets to a level it needs to be locked but we all know what that level is

No. 15390

Is it me or are both /pol/tards and /twitter/tards even worse than the radfems who spammed here? Jesus christ

No. 15391

>>15390
hence the "hijab girl stared at me so i must ask in the question thread why she stared at me even though no one even knows and must aggressively mention that she has a hijab on AND THEN get offended and defensive when people don't take my side hurrrdurrrr"

No. 15392

>>15391
This is what I mean. You’re responding so extreme, over what? The fuck. I don’t get it.

No. 15393

>>15374
I have the same question. Should I wait for the thread to re-open or is it completely hopeless ? I know /kpg/ was often a shitfest but it was sometimes enjoyable and it helped keep up with the comebacks and all.

No. 15395

>>15374
There's no critique in onehallyu. That place is filled with ass kissers.

>>15393
Hopefully it will open up way down the line or open one in manure. i'm gonna be patient and shut up about it for now.

No. 15397

https://discord.gg/8DrRnj

gay ass /kpg/ temp general till we figure out what to do next and stop harrasing mods, they will not bring it back

No. 15398

>>15397
>mods
God, i think i prefer the terfs

No. 15399

Can we get a ban for the whiteknight in Momokun's thread?
>>>/pt/778652
>>>/pt/778669
>>>/pt/778661
Baiting other anons when discussion has been on topic:
>>>/pt/778692
>>>/pt/778388

No. 15402

>>15399
And it continues
>>>/pt/778808
Hasn’t it been discussed just recently how complaining about how milkless cows are just unnecessarily clogs up threads?

No. 15403

>>15402
just report the posts kek you've had like 111 threads of momokun fat, let farmhands take their time at this point

No. 15404

The artist salt thread is full of racebait.

No. 15405

already reported but major medfagging in moo's thread.

No. 15406

>>15405
Anon, it's all on topic and no one is derailing to the point where its not on topic with possible tinfoil. It has basis for it.

No. 15407

>>15406
shit like >>>/pt/778871 is not on topic. no one needs to know about how gastric bypass or lap bands or whatever work.

No. 15408

>>15407

It's not derailing to correct someone. Doesn't look like it continued.

No. 15409

>>15408
it was still derailing because people replied telling her to stop. that post wasn't even correcting anything, anons weren't talking about every possibility. we've been having a huge problem with anons bringing up random crap to defend moo.

No. 15410

>>15409
Moo is a shit quality thread anyway, it attracts some of the worst users, just start policing your little fortress better, the reason it's getting derailed is because newfags love her and because of that it's probably easy to bait on there

No. 15411

>>15409
The post told the anon why it was impossible for moo to have gotten the bypass surgery? How the fuck is that derailing to correct someone? Stop minimodding over trivial shit.

No. 15412

>>15411
The minimodding is hilarious, actual links to the offending posts like anyone gives a shit and there hasn't been a post from a farmhand/admin in /meta/ in quite a while. Reports still work but it's the entitlement of our thread is being ruined who gives a shit lol

No. 15413

>>15410
>>15412
>>15411
that's not what minimodding is. this thread is for complaining. stop trying to infight, no one asked for your opinions.

No. 15414

>>15413
So report our infighting instead of engaging in the infight yourself/taking bait? nobody asked for any opinions on this site but we give them anyway and that's what it thrives on lmfao

No. 15417

Can you please remove the fuckin Townhall reminder already. It makes no sense how long these things stay up. Especially since most anons missed Townhall since we're used to ignoring it

No. 15418

>>15417
It's the last known date a farmhand was seen around these parts, we're keeping it safe until they return

No. 15420

Admin, can you please respond to or at least acknowldge my email regarding /kpg/?

>>15397
No thanks. I dispise discord & all the cliquefaggotry that goes with it. If /kpg/ is going to be moved off-site anyways why can't we just move it to another chan like CC?

No. 15421

>>15397
The discord is practically crawling with scrotes. There is nothing ever good and its always slow as hell. lolcow's discord is lowtier. Being pressed about it like this is pretty funny.

No. 15423

Tf this person >>>/ot/566747 is everywhere. They posted this crap on every single board I visit.

No. 15424

>>15421
nta but what does lc discord have to do with what anon said?

No. 15425

>>15424
some anon made a temporary /kpg/ discord that has like five members lol >>15397

i dont think discord is the end option either, but /kpg/ in its current state is absolute cancer and makes /m/ fucking annoying for everyone else who isnt into kpop

No. 15426

>>15417
Kek you got your wish.

No. 15427

>>15426
kek "yes there will be hellweek" still no communication on here for more than a week. like what the fuck has been happening and what's the point of a hellweek when the farmhands won't even say anything

No. 15428

>>15427
They're probably just busy, understaffed or have nothing to add. Like an anon above said, when in doubt, there's always the report function.

No. 15430

>>15427
Hellweek was announced weeks ago, the poll results from the townhall confirmed it so it seems like you're behind.

No. 15431

whats this new black box when you type up a comment?

i'm scared and afraid of change, aaaa

(not actually an issue/complaint, I just usually lurk and didn't notice it til now)

No. 15432

what suggests that hellweek is even effective? the results, if any, are clearly very short term.

No. 15433

>>15430
Piss off anon, i was at townhall i remember someone called renton there, just accept that announcing a "hellweek" with absolutely no other communication, answering reports but still not talking is just weird and not open. Why are you wking the farmhands fucking kek

No. 15434

>>15431
are you talking about spoilered text? that's not new…

No. 15435

File: 1591631854402.png (6.8 KB, 392x268, 42.png)

>>15434
They're probably talking about this.

No. 15436

>>15435
Its just highlighting your selected typing area

No. 15438


No. 15440

>>15425
If the admin doesn't want to accomodate kpop on LC then can we just move the threads to crystal.cafe?

No. 15441

>>15435
Mine is orange

No. 15442

>>15441
pretty sure it’s different depending on your browser. mine is only on mobile and it does it in literally any text box i type in anywhere.

No. 15443

>>15374
4/mu/ and 4/wsg/ both have KPOP generals. Go there.

No. 15444

>>15443
>look mom I posted it again!

No. 15445

>>15444
Don't be upset at people being annoyed by the What About Kpop meme in here over and over again. While we have regular integrated users who have an interest in kpop, it largely represents Twitter retards and teenagers who are not welcome here at all.

No. 15447

>>15445
Heed your own advice and shut the fuck up about it then. Nobody was even talking about it anymore until you came along.

No. 15448

>>15447
Ayrt and this was my first post about the matter. This is why you need to leave. Stop bringing your kpop feelings onto the board, nobody cares.

No. 15449

>>15448
the farmhands should just address the situation and either say "we're never opening it again go away" or "we are but we're working on it so stop asking every two days"

it is really fucking annoying seeing it get asked about literally every day, but its easy to just say "no never again leave" and end the conversation

No. 15450

>>15420
>>15440
>>15449
For those wondering about /kpg/ - we don't know if/when it's going to return. We're working under the assumption that it isn't going to come back. In the end, the decision is ultimately up to Admin. She's currently busy so it's something we'll discuss with her upon her return.

No. 15451

>>15450
thank u mod for doing the gods work

hopefully this stops all the fucking questions about /kpg/

No. 15452

>>15450
Thanks for answering. I hope it does come back, but i know that nagging the mods isnt helping everyone, so i hope people will freakin stop. Ultimately, i love lolcow and will continue to use it no matter what the decision. Hope we can contain it in the future. thanks for the answer.

No. 15453

Wasn’t admin a kpop stan herself? If so, I doubt it’ll be gone for good.
Don’t know if it was just a baseless tinfoil or confirmed.

No. 15454

The Moo thread is full of weight/BMI sperging, which I thought wasn't allowed? Juts once it would be nice to go in there and see actual milk instead of people looking for a million different ways to call her fat. Yes, we get it, she's fat. I don't see how that's milk.

No. 15455

>>15453
That was a baseless tinfoil from the radfems

No. 15456

>>15453
>>15455
its because admin posted "stan loona" randomly i think in response to some sperg. not entirely baseless.

No. 15457

I know the mods took down the anisa thread, but can they explain why they don't want to make a dedicated one for her now? The entire twitch thread is just people sperging about her onlyfans content and any selfie she posts

I know it was originally locked because all anons did was nitpick her boob job and selfies, but they're just doing it in the twitch thread and drowning any discussion about anyone else/the actual topic

No. 15458

>>15456
How are you going to say it's not baseless when that's never happened?

No. 15460

>>15458
it was in the discord, calm down.

No. 15461

File: 1591820722573.png (6.48 KB, 774x88, 09.PNG)


No. 15462

>>15457
that thread fucking sucks bc of anisaposting, she needs to be a banned topic or she should get her own thread.

No. 15463

>>15462
yup, theres tons of twitch drama and actual milk to talk about but all the topics just get drowned by nitpicking

i get her onlyfans and boobjob wasnt milky so the mods closed down the thread, but these nitpicky anons just congregate on the twitch thread and ruin that topic

i think the mods should either ban the topic alltogether or just let them have their anisa thread to nitpick so the twitch thread can actually be used for its intended topic

No. 15464

>>15457
i believe admin once revealed it was a few dedicated vendetta-chans posting there who were making most of the threads posts samefagging.

>>15461
>she doesnt know stan loona is a meme to make fun out of kfags
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/stan-loona

No. 15465

I’m still super new to discord and I feel like an idiot but how do I actually join the lolcow server????? I’m locked out of everything

No. 15466

>>15464
did you even read the conversation you replied to

No. 15467

>>15464
i mean even the vendetta-chan or whatever situation warrants either blocking the topic altogether, or quarantining them into a separate thread topic because they literally will derail most other topics on the twitch thread with this chick's onlyfans nitpicking

my point was that it's making a thread that isn't supposed to be about her completely about her and thus useless

No. 15468

>>15467
usually when that happens the cow gets greenlighted for their own thread.

No. 15469

>>15457
Most threads nowadays are just onlyfans criticism

Have you dipped into the Venus and onion threads lately? On a deeper convo, why are all the cows making onlyfans lol

No. 15470

>>15469
i mean discussing onlyfans is fine, the criticism is that its not on a thread dedicated to that cow, the spergs freaking out about her boobjob literally just took over the twitch thread because "we cant nitpick on our thread so we're going to do it here"

the mods should just open a thread for her and let it go to shit honestly, she's not even milky but those anons are obsessed with her

No. 15472

>>15470
The twitch thread was dead already and hadn’t been updated before anisa happened. If you want to see it active, contribute other streamers. If someone without sage bumps the thread with no milk/nitpick, report them for stirring shit.

No. 15473

Please let us have the pink pill threads back

No. 15474

Please don't bring the pink pill threads back

No. 15475

>>15450
To admins/farmhands consideration: if you ultimately decide to accomodate /kpg/ then have it on autosage mode so it doesn't clog the frontpage and /m/. Would it be possible to set a slow mode like the one in Discord thru which people have to wait a few seconds in between messages, thus, avoiding spamming/sperging/samefagging

No. 15476

>>15473
too bad so sad

No. 15477

>>15472

When the Fed & Yuna/FerociouslySteph milk happened, there was discussion about those streamers in that thread which unfortunately got drowned out with "lel Anisa's dirty feet"

At this point Anisa is the new Amina. Just a handful of vocal anons with massive, throbbing hate boners.

No. 15478

>>15473
You literally have a whole board for it just go there…

No. 15479

>>15477
Nobody is mini-modding and saying other streamers can’t be discussed though? That’s the nature of general threads. If you have milk, contribute. If other people want to discuss it, then discussion happens.

No. 15481

File: 1592073484509.jpeg (208.32 KB, 828x1437, E03EB320-D3AE-41B1-9998-377B6F…)

>>15479
the thing is it isnt milk, the conversation gets drowned out because some anon with a hate boner for the 100th gross anisa onlyfans selfie spams pictures and derails the conversation

its happened so many times, the fed/yuna convo is just an example. people were talking about fed/yuna and then some anon posted some anisa selfie and the usual crowd of anisa haters piled on and nitpicked about her feet. i get "any streamer" can be discussed, but it's hard to discuss a topic when it just gets cut off by 15 messages of "omg she needs to wash her feet and her boobs are so ugly"

besides, being a skanky thot on onlyfans and not washing your feet is not milky at all, its literally just nitpicking her selfie every time it comes up. half the conversations about anisa are just anons harping about how thotty and ugly she is and how her boob job is bad, its never about actual milk

screenshot attached to show what i mean, its literally just some anon posting a picture of a skanky selfie and then four anons nitpicking about her looks…the only milk here is the dairy on her tits

No. 15482

>>15481
I get how that might be annoying but you can’t force people to be interested and talk about a topic. What are possible solutions?

No. 15483

>>15482
it was already proposed, either ban her as a topic on the twitch thread or give her an individual thread so the four anons with a hateboner for her stop spamming the twitch thread

it was funny for a while and once in a while it's fun to laugh at how trashy she is, but it's getting pretty old

No. 15484

Can TERF and similar terms be redtexted?

No. 15485

>>15482

Anisa was a banned topic like 3 admins ago. That really helped.

When iDubbbz was exposed for being a simp/cuck because of Anisa's only fans, the Anisafags were especially adamant with having their own thread back because "wow all look at all this milk!!" This admin and staff seem to have given the Anisafags a chance and look at where it's gotten the Twitch general thread.

Ban Anisa again. Having their own thread on autosage will nothelp. See: that cringe Anisa "content cop" they made that tipped people about the boards.

No. 15486

>>15485
Or alternatively just hide threads you don’t like.

No. 15487

>>15485
>Anisa was a banned topic like 3 admins ago. That really helped.
If you paid attention you would know why the thread is still banned for over a year now.

No. 15488

>>15487
right, So what on earth justifies her not being a banned topic in the twitch thread?

No. 15489


No. 15490

>>15489
they also said
>it will probably devolve into nitpicking and a few vendettas like most general threads

which is has, so perhaps the mods need to either ban her as a topic because the twitch thread is basically the "shit on unmilky skank" thread

No. 15491

any farmahands dare to check the venus thread? The newfags and coomers are derailing everything, which makes it impossible to have a half-way decent conversation.

No. 15492

Farmhands, pls pls pls tell the Jonny/off topic speds in the TND thread to shut the fuck up and to make a thread for him in /snow/. The thread gets derailed/bumped every other day because of those retards and just banning them isn't solving anything because then a bunch of other anons come out of the woodwork like "b-but it's on topic and Taylor isn't posting anything anyway???!!!".

No. 15493

/kpg/ fags i think it's gonna take a few weeks until admin makes her final decision. let's move the discussion to crystal.cafe in the meanwhile.

No. 15494

/m/ has seriously been great since Kpop has been removed. I wasn't one of the anons initially requesting it be banned but the board is just so much better without Kpop taking up the first two pages. Now people actually post in the other threads and get replies.

No. 15495

>>15491
Seriously, it should be put on autosage so the simps, moralfags and angry newfags can't find it. I never report posts in other threads, but on hers there are at least 10 absolutely autistic posts every day. Hellweek can't come soon enough for that shitshow of a thread kek

No. 15496

>>15495
Or locked altogether.
It’s basically just WKs and PULL-tards atm.

No. 15497

File: 1592176307627.jpeg (102.21 KB, 607x301, 8C00782F-564C-4720-98E0-677F94…)

>>15491
I went to see the shitshow thinking it wouldn’t be so bad but wow, biggest laugh I’ve had in a while

I’d just report bad posts and wait for hell week to happen

No. 15498

File: 1592185579585.jpg (399.15 KB, 1080x1955, IMG_20200615_034223.jpg)

>>15491
Nobody can tell me that the thread doesn't consist of 90% neckbeards who only come here for her of pics and to wk her (her and whatever animuh she "cosplays")

No. 15499

Just nuke the Venus thread pls people are saying it’s infested by pull tards but her thread is actually fine there, it’s 90% coomers and farmers fighting each other, on the thothub thread they post content that was first posted on lolcow so they are infesting the thread for her leaks

No. 15500

>>15499
Why delete it completely? Her thread is no different from momo’s(that also derails due to Onlyfans nitpicks), just let the mods handle it

No. 15501

>>15500
then nuke the momothread too lol
the momo thread is just as shitty and cancerous with wk and nitpicking

No. 15502

>>15500
I do wonder what lolcow would be like if all milkless sex worker threads were purged.

No. 15503

>>15502
/cgl/

No. 15505

I've been seeing a lot of lolicon defenders on /ot/ and /w/ lately. It's the usual "loli porn isn't bad it's just drawings" shit. Is that a bannable offense or should I not bother reporting? Cause it's obviously men who post shit like that.

No. 15506

>>15505
no you haven't, you're just an anon who thinks beenus is cosplaying loli and pedo pandering.

No. 15507

>>15506
Stop being a sperg. I've seen it in the art discussion thread on /ot/ too. It's an issue in several threads.

No. 15508

>>15507
you're the idiot who thinks it's against site rules to have different opinions.

No. 15509

people accusing each other of being twitterfags is becoming extremely repetitive and annoying

No. 15510

>>15507
there's nothing political about laughing at cows. your reasons for making fun of them can't be twisted into putting you on the right side of history.

all we do here is laugh at stupid people.

No. 15511

>>15509
>hi cow
>hi scrote
>hi tranny
>hi radfem
>hi femcel
>hi samefag
>hi lsafag
>hi twitterfag
the diversity is beautiful

No. 15512

>>15511
lmao it's like the second one gets banned another one just emerges and to take its place. I don't think anything can even be done about it because even if they ban 'hi twitterfag' something else will start.

No. 15513

>>15510
It's so weird and annoying how some threads have gone from
>she did this, kek what a moron
to
>she did this, how dare she? can't she be stopped? that's so problematic! how can you joke about this, this is serious!

Thank god the sperging about which cow did what for blm has calmed down.

No. 15515

>>15509
yup the venus thread has gone completely off the rails into infighting and people calling each other twitterfags/WK/newfags

the entire conversation right now is a moral crusade about the morality of pedobaiting and catgirls, can the mods please ban the idiots who keep WKing

No. 15516

>>15511
The better question is: which term beats what?

No. 15517

>>15505
I noticed that too.

No. 15519

>>15491
Seconded, it's full of obvious ESL newfags with shit grammar, WKs and armchair psychologists.

No. 15520

>>15515
Any mention of the word pedo should be a reportable ban in her thread. This is ridiculous. It's so fucking pearl clutching. It's been 2 weeks. Get over the fact this is doing fucking sex work already. It's no longer extra milky. And the fucking anon who keeps cowtipping and trying to befriend Margo and believing her lies and calling it milk is fucking pathetic.

No. 15521

>>15505
Imagine being a fucking child who is trafficked and listening to morons online defend a 2D drawing over real child molestation and rape. You sound as fucking stupid as the people who think video games causes real violence. It's the same fucking mentality. This isn't how the brain works. All pedo spergs need a 3 month ban or some shit. Not just a 1 day or 2.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 15522

>>15520
exactly, why isnt that fucking anon banned yet, its blatant cowtipping

No. 15523

>>15522
They are desperate to have some fake reunion and everyone already know that's not going to happen and spewing about how she needs a normal family to be happy and stuff is so cringy. A lot fo sex workers have relationships that are asexual for one person and not for the other. There isn't anything inherently wrong with her relationship or what she is doing. She's going down the list of typical hentai check boxes, regardless of how 'popular' they are, because she's marketing for as wide a berth of fans as possible.

I don't understand why there are so many kids here who just can't handle how adults and sex and relationships work. Stuff is crying, but the most milky thing she has done is the Beenus thing and that's literally just DD/LG fetish, not real pedo, and she can't control her body never going to be an hourglass womanly shape, so she will always look small. Someone will always scream 'pedo pandering' at anything she ever does. It's tired and needs to be downright bankable and please permaban the anon who keeps cowtipping and making Instagram accounts and asking us to join it to harass venus through it.

No. 15524

>>15505
This shit constantly comes up recently because the internet has become obsessed with "pedo hunting" (reporting drawings and cancelling artists) and they feel outrage whenever women don't give enough of a fuck, we must be sick in the head or scrotes.
Just watch how there's some probably underage anon that keeps bringing up gross loli artists in the artist salt thread, probably expects lc to be their army and doxx them. In /m/ posting any underage anime character was fine years ago, now it gets discussion completely derailed. In the bad art thread, people even post good art of sexualized anime teenagers, even if it's not remotely lolicon or poorly drawn, also creating arguments. Same thing for weeb cosplayers, costhots sexualizing teen fictional characters wasn't out of the norm years ago and now you can't have a conversation without addressing the feelings of the poor anime minors.
I do agree there are probably scrote loli fans in the Venus thread, but if every anime related art or cosplay on social media has children infighting about "pedo" shit in the comments, I'm not surprised it happens on lc too.

I hope this trend stops because I remember before this obsession with fictional pedo stuff cropped up, Pixyteri had severe accusations of child sexual abuse thrown her way. People initially believed it because she had loli and shota cosplay phases and liked things like that on tumblr, but it turned out to be false. I can't imagine if this had happened nowadays, people would have called the cops on her.

No. 15525

Honestly the debate on whether Loli is CP needs to be banned. It's such a common argument and threads get derailed all the time because of it. I feel like it happens every other day.

No. 15527

>>15525
I don't see the merit of allowing drawn child porn to be posted on this website. Loli art is also categorically recognized as child porn in Canada lol.

No. 15528

>>15527
what kind of severe brain damage do you have?
>>15524
anons were bitching about "aged up" characters in a thread too.

No. 15529

>>15528
samefag but i think the reason the venus thread is so bad now is because all of her female fans are in it, not her male ones. the thread would get derailed off and on by wks of hers, but now they are the ones who are grossed out by her and moralfagging. i personally don't care what kind of fetish crap she's doing as it's all equally cringe, and more anons probably agree. doesn't make us men just because we're not up in arms derailing the thread for no reason.

No. 15530

>>15528
yeah, i think moralfagging about "omg this character is 13 in anime but you bolted a pair of tits on her" is old as fuck and not interesting, not to mention it just causes infighting and name calling

the "loli is child porn" argument is old and no one gives a shit what two or three moralfags have to say about it every time its brought up, because they seem to just stalk the thread and freak out whenever a "questionable" picture by their standards pop up.

i think the great majority of farmers understand the differentiation between true cp and weird loli fanart/aged up characters, so i think it would be helpful if mods just banned the "ur a bunch of pedos for looking at these fanarts"

No. 15531

actual CP in /g/ and /m/ again. (not related to the arguing tards)

No. 15532

>>15531
Is it the links? Gonna report it as cp next time too if thats what you mean

No. 15533

>>15532
nta but yes it's the links
a few weeks ago there was also the same but with "pedomom files download"

No. 15534

>>15533
Thanks anon. I just checked and its still there. I hope it gets deleted soon

No. 15535

>>15529
Yeah, pretty accurate.
Literally 90% of the replies to the current Venus thread are a samefag who keeps ban evading and accusing everyone else of being whiteknights.
I found her personal instagram account very easily because she's so terrible at hiding her writing style and made a sockpuppet just for moralfagging Venus.
She's been going off for over 8 hours straight now in that thread and I'm shocked no mods have seemed to notice yet.

No. 15536

>>15531
Is it deleted now? I'm scared to go on those board right now in case I stumble upon it.

No. 15537

>>15536
Yes its gone now. There were no pics or anything like that. Just some very sus links. Someone took it down yesterday right before the site went down.

On that note, does anybody know why the site stopped working yesterday?

No. 15538

> Venus thread is filled with newfags and SJWs
> Trannie newfags keep bumping necrothreads and fighting everyone

What a day.

No. 15540

File: 1592401662624.jpeg (207.93 KB, 1154x1510, E5F50435-FD2F-429F-94AE-0DAE7B…)

Sorry had to delete this because I forgot to crop my icon out.
This is the a-logging anon who has been spamming the Venus thread for weeks and is ben evading because the janitor is incompetent.

No. 15541

>>15540
I love you anon! You're the farmhand we need.
Between her (?) and her long ass essay "you're just silly little girls clutching your pearls" counterpart, the thread is just unreadable.

No. 15542

File: 1592411819856.png (135.39 KB, 1085x601, alcoholpoisoning.PNG)

>>15541
Thank you!, I really miss the old mods.
She's posting on PULL as well and using the exact same phrases as the thread here.
It would probably be deadly if anyone took a shot every time she uses
>"pandering"
>"pearl clutching"
>"?" at the end of every post
>outdated internet phrases like "gtfo"
>ESL typos
>praising "margot"
>"beenoos", "peenos" while refusing to say her name
>sorry can't begin to think of the other obvious ones without giving myself brain damage

No. 15544

>>15542
>>15540
thread when

No. 15545

>>15544
maybe we should make a thread for cringy cowtippers in general. then this cunt and the girl in luna's thread can be properly laughed at without derailing.

No. 15547

>>15545
I feel like that will incentivize these kinds of people to do it more

No. 15548

The pro ana thread is full of race sperging.

No. 15550

Is there any way to stop contents from certain threads from showing up completely? I hid the ana thread but the pictures still appear on the starting screen and I'd love it if I wouldn't have to look at the pictures from these people every day.

No. 15551

>>15550
browse lolcow less

No. 15552


No. 15553

>>15552
A godsend

No. 15555

>>15554
Mods are busy sucking tranny dick

No. 15556

When you all get the chance can you ban the race derailing shit mixed with radfem nonsense in the celebricow thread? Thanks.

No. 15557

>>15556
Seconded

No. 15558

Can you do something about the bloody dick that's in god know which thread (probably g).

No. 15562

please do something about the newfaggots blogging and bumping the cryaotic thread with "hello, what is this?" and "who?"

No. 15563

Did former kpg users really move to that discord server that kept getting shilled here or somewhere else?

No. 15565

>>15562
There are also a bunch of whiteknights in there too. The amount of pedo apologists and newfags is astounding. It's hellweek so hopefully it'll die down.

No. 15566

Cry's thread is crazy. People refusing to sage,there's so much samefagging, white knighting, twitter fags and it honestly emotional as fuck.

No. 15574

Is there a reason that the kpop thread isn't just moved to /manure/ ?

No. 15575

>>15574
So the kpop fags fuck off.

No. 15576

So are kpop threads definitely gone for good? It seems kind of unfair to ban them forever when other threads are so much worse. Venus threads are literally just infighting and pedo sperging. If it went back to just being kpc there wouldn’t be as many twitterfags.

No. 15577

>>15540
How is this established???

No. 15578

>>15576
Yes there would. Twitterfags used kpc to complain about kpop groups they don't like because they're too pussy to do it on twitter, they just got bold because of the name change. Those threads haven't been good in forever.

No. 15579

>>15578
Twitterfags who complained about groups weren’t the problem though. It’s the twitterfags who were underage bts stans that made the threads shit and they wouldn’t have come on the thread if it was just kpc.

No. 15580

>>15576
Please don't bring Kpop back, at least not on /m/. /m/ has been so good lately without it. If admin brings it back, give it a containment board or some shit(not recommended, too many twitter fags).

No. 15581

>>15580
i used the boards a ton and i agree, they were fucking cancer because of twitterfags and underage bts fans that would sperg at every mention of negative criticism

unless the mods decided to keep it on permanent autosage or move it to another board, i dont think it should come back. either way it would be an absolute shitshow but if we do get it back it needs some hard purging in the beginning to deter some of the less persistent twitterfags

No. 15582

>>15579
Did you forget about the ban evading ratmy and yutachan? Those were from kpc, not kpg. The thread isnt going to stop attracting retards from Twitter just because of a name change. Kpc has always had low key stanning, racebaiting, nitpicking, "reeee you must be a stan because you dont agree that this idol looks like a botched goblin" infighting, and other bullshit. I can't say I miss either thread.

No. 15583

>>15582
it was a good thread half of the time when people actually discussed news and stuff, but the other half was just infighting stirred up by two or three ban evading stans, the problem is people just keep taking the bait and arguing instead of ignoring it and moving on

i think perhaps autosage mode and making it kpg would cull some of it, but the few persistent shitty ban evading idiots make it a toss-up

No. 15584

>>15581
I'm okay with it being on perma autosage. That's a good middle ground. It will deter the newfags who can't into the catalog and don't know how to sage.

No. 15587

Thanks for the hellweek on /ot/ as well. I've seen a lot of redtext to pointlessly inflammatory anons and bait and I appreciate it. Doing God's work, Farmhands.

No. 15592

People whining about Pronouns in Cry thread

No. 15593

Just general whining but god there are so many new people that are obviously scrotes this week because of the Cry thread. Making this website feel like kiwifarms lite rn since it's just them being difficult and obtuse on purpose lmao

No. 15594

>>15592
>>15593
there is so much derailing and newfaggotry in the cry thread, its honestly bordering on unreadable

i get theres tons of milk around cry right now, but the mods should hellweek/purge the fuck out of that thread because half of the posts are violating hellweek rules

No. 15595

>>15594
Yeah, exactly what I mean!! That's really getting to me that on that thread alone I can't even tell it's supposed to be fuckin hellweek.
There are so many cry defenders and incels typing like they're making some type of manifesto I can't read for one second without getting a headache

No. 15597

File: 1593308276615.png (7.16 KB, 605x92, amen.png)

I'm sure there is no end of work you have to do for this site, but if you ever get bored, admin, can you publicly identify how many of the baby jane comparison posts are the same anon(s)?

this isn't a complaint, i'd just find it funny

No. 15598

We have a clusterfuck going on in marilyn manson thread.
I'll explain.
One of his victims came to the previous (the third) thread to defend and, consequently, milk herself a bit after she was discussed, she moralfagged a lot, fought with anons, etc. We decided not to post about her because she was not the subject and there was nothing new concerning her experience with manson. Basically at some point discussion of her actions turned into pure derailment because it had NOTHING to do with manson. Currently the same bs is happening in the fourth thread. Some messages come across like vendetta posting because (I think) one anon keeps posting what have already been posted and covered many many times. Each time that girl is mentioned terrible shitstorm starts anew.
Another problem is that the thread went down to discussion of shady crazy fan accounts that probably have nothing to do with manson.
Every single one in the thread will be happy if a poster who's known as Dawn gets banned FOREVER. PLEASE.
I cannot understand why anons who post about noname ig accounts are not banned, none of them contribute to the thread.

Please could a mod come and clean it? Thank you!
>>>/snow/982539

No. 15601

Admin I will dead ass go through every Shay thread since fupas introduction and compile a list of every post I suspect to be fupa posting if someone on mod team is willing to review and verify they're at the least all from one user in that area

There's not a sliver of a chance in my mind he hasn't been active in the threads this whole time, especially after the recent milk reveal

Despite all my years on here and cgl before this, I will stop lurking LC or any sites similar if I'm wrong about it

No. 15602

>>15584
Can we have it on perma autosage pls Admin?

No. 15603

I'm thinking we might need another hellweek with the increasing influx of people from reddit

No. 15604

Why was the Shane Dawson thread locked? I know it said to move it to the BG thread but why how when it was fine before? I get it's tied with BG drama but it mainly focuses on two people? IDK I just feel like there should be a separate one for Shane since he isn't apart of that community much

Also pls remove hellweek banner since it's over and not keep it up for over a month again lol

No. 15605

File: 1593586480536.jpeg (14.74 KB, 250x250, 1AA4CD21-2B21-4501-A512-55F083…)

>>15604
Exactly. Why is Shane not worthy of his own thread? He’s had his own threads for a while now. Why does admin insist on constantly making shitty, unnecessary decisions that the lolcow userbase doesn’t agree with?

No. 15606

>>15605
I agree with admin and I use this site nearly daily. What are you gonna do now, frogchan? Perhaps we're not a monolith.

No. 15607

>>15606
I obviously meant that it’s a decision the MAJORITY of the userbase disagrees with. You agree Shane is part of the “beauty community”? Okay, lol.

No. 15609

>>15604
Yeah I don't really get why now while Shane is in the middle of escalating, career-destroying, far-reaching drama it's the right time to shoehorn him into another thread that he barely fits into now and likely won't fit into at all soon enough since he fucking denounced the beauty community. This is also going to have a chilling effect on the posting and discussion of unrelated beauty community milk for as long as this shit drags on and that's no fun. Plus anon already took the time to make a nice new OP…

No. 15610

>>15609
to be fair the beauty guru thread has been largely overtaken by jstar drama for a while and was dead otherwise, but with the advent of how quickly drama is developing since the last 12 hours (and how it'll likely implode once shane or jeffree make a "statement") i dont really understand forcing the conversation into the beauty guru thread which is already nearing lock status anyways

i get wanting to quarantine topics to a specific thread if there isnt milk, but there is obviously a ton of milk developing that warrants a standalone thread by /snow/ standards

No. 15611

Please unlock the newest Shane Dawson thread, he doesn’t even belong in the bg threads anyway. Thanks.

No. 15612

>>15609
Anon made the thread after complaining about the announcement and decided to make the thread anyways. The thread OP isn't deleted, things can merge back when things steady down because there are three different threads with overlapping cows.
>>15605
>Why does admin insist on constantly making shitty, unnecessary decisions that the lolcow userbase doesn’t agree with?
>I obviously meant that it’s a decision the MAJORITY of the userbase disagrees with.
I had no idea you spoke up for the majority of the userbase, including the newfags infiltrating from GG, reddit, pull, and twitter.

No. 15613

>>15612
I’m not “speaking up for” the majority of the userbase. I’m saying what’s true. You can go to the threads yourself and read the anons disagreeing with you. You are known for making changes that the majority of the userbase disagree with.

No. 15614

>>15612
Yeah they're overlapping but at that point you might as well combine the twitch and youtube threads because they have a lot of overlap.
I just think there's a better way to go about it for rn since most have just been going to the respective thread to talk about them. Like the Shane thread was mainly focused on him and his friends, BG was focusing on the BG at large and other BGers reaction and takes. Merging threads just never seems like a good idea because then there's too much to sort through.
Also, again, the hellweek banner. When is it getting removed?? It wasn't even updated for how long hellweek would be (June 22 - June 29) ?? Not trying to be rude but like, is it that hard to update/remove because we always get stuck with it for weeks on end after something has ended.

No. 15615

is it just me or does it feel like no one is saging and there's a bunch of weirdos in Snow?

No. 15616

>>15615
and by weirdos I mean new fags. Also I don't get why Shane could'nt keep his own thread? The thread is basically Shane/Jeffree and co.
The beauty guru thread is more focused on tati anyway.

No. 15617

>>15616
theres very likely an influx of newfags from PULL, reddit, twitter etc due to the beauty guru fallout

At least the conversation hasnt derailed into infighting and sperging, but mods probably need to keep an eye on it if it goes to shit

No. 15618

We need a new admin, this one is being incompetent to say the least.

No. 15619

>>15612
So will we get the Shane/Jeff 4 thread unlocked when BG maxes?

imo it makes no sense to have shoved him in there, mod said it was to prevent overlap but all it is is overlap and people reposting shit that was already posted in S/J because the BG people didn't read S/J. It makes even less sense to shove him in there when it was already >1100 posts? why shove him into a new thread where he doesn't belong for <100 posts when we already have a new thread ready to go? this just totally disrupted the flow of the milk

honestly Shane/Jeffree thread could be in pt but that’s just my opinion. I feel like telling us to talk about Shane and Jeff in the BG thread is like if mods said to only talk about Onion in the Youtube thread. The amount of milk and history is comparable, the scope is just too large. Yeah it’s Dramageddon but of the Dramageddon 2 cast, Tati has said 1 (one) thing, Jeffree and Charles have said nothing. Shane is the one actively making a fool out of himself and having his entire history called out and career destroyed. The milk that’s overflowing is Shane, Dramageddon is just one of the many udders and Karmageddon is a different beast entirely. Shane and Jeffree have been a package deal for years now, and James/Tati have been a part of the Shane herd since this all started last year (cause we been knew it was Shane and Jeffree this whole time)

the BG threads (which are meant to encompass the entirety of Beauty youtube, no small feat) have barely managed 2 threads in over 3 years. Shane’s milk/cows alone have filled 3+ threads in half that time, so it’s not like he can’t sustain a thread. I think the best solution would be to unlock S/J for Karmageddon talk, and then let us still have a BG thread, because there's plenty of non-Drama/Karma BG drama, there's hundreds of other gurus. I also agree with anon that said combining Youtube General and Twitch/Let's Play threads is a good idea. Just contributing my opinion is all.

>>15610
>>15617
we could never get a word in edgewise about jsnore in BG, it was always flooded with his spergs that mods would ignore. In the Shane/Jeff thread we were actually safe to talk about him because the wks couldn't throw it over to other gurus to try and divert attention from jeff. THAT'S why it hadn't derailed yet, there's no wiggle room for it in S/J like there is in BG. none of this jeffree milk is new (in fact most of it is a decade old) we just could never talk about it before bc of the jeffree spergs. honestly I never understood why mods ignored the jeff floods, it's not like people weren't complaining, we probably could've had him cancelled years ago if they'd actually done something about it

No. 15620

File: 1593645822697.jpeg (385.54 KB, 750x903, 337AC02A-2381-4C3E-9688-6D433D…)

beauty guru is maxed, can we have shane 4 unlocked?

also i just noticed the beauty guru op from a year ago literally says
>Shane Thread for future Shane/Jeffree content
with the shane thread linked. so the thread was designated as not for shane and jeffree talk since day 1? so if there was ‘overlap’ from people posting there instead of the shane thread they clearly can’t read. if onion can have his threads outside of youtube general and tnd can have hers outside of pet youtube general why can’t shame and jeffstein continue to have theirs outside of beauty youtube general? it’s not like…..a new or confusing concept for this site lmao. unlock 4 for drama/karma and shame and jeffstein’s downfall and let us talk about the other thousands of gurus (with nothing to so with karma/shame/jeff) in beauty general like we do for onion and tnd

No. 15621

>>15620
i feel like they'll ignore this anon sadly. Lolcow has been ruining the fun lately. The few times on this site where we actually have good shit going on that isnt the incessant camgirl nitpicking and mods wanna take us to manure. I get it but DAMN

No. 15622

all this bitching over the technicality of what the thread is called jfc

No. 15623

The shane thread was just unlocked and moved to /pt/ after the beauty youtuber one maxxed out

No. 15624

>>15623
What is this faggot doing in /pt/? Gonna be bumped multiple times a day by newfags.

No. 15625

>>15624
there's an actual fuckton of milk, lighten up lol

No. 15626

>>15625
So once the current gush of milk dries up, the booty guru threads are gonna be on /pt/ from now on?
Why not add Cry & Shay at this point? Why wasn't GG thread with ProJared drama moved to /pt/ when it blew up?
With reddit exodus and quarantine new fags, I just don't understand why that counts, and other threads didn't.
I'm not going to hide it bc I like the milk but don't think it deserves to be pt on a whim.

No. 15627

>>15626
They're two entirely different threads it's just that nobody made a new beauty guru thread. ProJared is stale milk based on a single affair and some angry sweaty nerds and weebs, cry is a streamer, shay is camwhore but she isn't pt worthy by a longshot. I don't know how you would think shane or jefree don't deserve to be in pt when they're actually pretty relevant as some of the longest running cryptocows.

No. 15629

>>15624
Just hide the thread if it bothers you this much. Jfc it’s not that hard.
If it starts bleeding out into other threads and they get flooded by twitter- or newfags I’d be with you. But as of right now what’s the big deal?

No. 15630

>>15602
seconded

No. 15631

Can TERF be red texted?

No. 15633

>>15631
Seconded

No. 15635

It says that the connection isn't secure, what's going on?

No. 15636

Can a mod take care of the "dyke hater" anon sperging in the Shoeonhead thread, he/she's been raging for hours

No. 15637

>>15636
This. Is it the same anon sperging about lesbians in the fujo thread? Jesus christ.

No. 15638

>>15637
Since racebaiting is against the rules, they had to come up with something else I guess.

No. 15639

some paranoid femcel in the confessions thread on /ot/ won't stop sperging and fighting with other anons about how she thinks everyone on this board hates her and thinks she's ugly. other anons have tried to thoughtfully respond but it's clear she's just attention-seeking and derailing the thread at this point

No. 15640

>>15635
Same for me…

No. 15641

I don’t know if this just me but I constantly get false ban alerts for posts that clearly aren’t mine (like weird racebait posts) with someone else’s ip listed, and rn I keep getting a permaban alert for my computer (which I almost never use at this point) which says it was appealed and denied. I have never filed a ban appeal ever, and the IP listed isn’t mine either. Can someone explain why this keeps happening?

No. 15642

File: 1593895838250.png (269.55 KB, 1080x2034, Capture _2020-07-04-15-45-05.p…)

Don't know what this is. Definitely not my comment

No. 15643

>>15642
IP cycling. it's not your old ban.

No. 15644

ot is full of trannysperging (unpopular opinion and artist salt for instance.) There's one or two speds caping for trannies, and then a bunch of radfem anons are taking the bait and writing walls of text in response. It's a mess and it's completely derailed a few threads now.

No. 15645

can someone tell me why is the kpop thread locked?

No. 15647

>>15645
its been locked for a while now, the farmhands and admin are still deciding if they want to allow kpop threads to exist on /m/ since there's been a huge issue with twitterfags and rabid defenders derailing and making the thread unusable

several anons have provided recommendations on how to curb the newfaggotry/twitter sperging but so far admin has not made a decision.

No. 15648

>>15647
Isn’t there any way to just ban them though? I thought the situation was better already :/

No. 15649

>>15648
no, because a good number of them were boasting about ban evading and such, not to mention a ton of these are new twitterfags who keep bumping the thread because they dont understand how to sage etc.

it sucks, especially since there is so much to talk about right now in the kpop industry, but until the admin makes a statement it's not coming back.

No. 15650

>>15649
I hope this can be solved soon, I’ve been waiting for a long time already

No. 15651

Why is there a "South Korea general" thread on ot? So can we just make threads on random countries for discussion now?

No. 15652

>>15651
im assuming its some pisspoor attempt at circumventing the kpg lockdown…theres a france one too lol

No. 15653

>>15652
Yeah but the France general thread has French anons while the SK thread is just koreaboos lol.

No. 15654

>>15653
yea the french one is actual discussion the korean one is just koreaboos trying to transition into kpop talk LOL

No. 15655

>>14594
can someone ban the alinity wk in the twitch thread? they're shitting up the thread with infighting and defending her and it's tiring as hell

No. 15656

>>15655
agreed, not to mention theyre blatantly samefagging two posts at once (one unsaged) for some reason

No. 15657

>>15656
same anon, can mods please get rid of this alinity simp? theyre blatantly samefagging, fighting, and sockpuppeting two posts at a time to try and make it look like there's more than one poster sperging about alinity

its so fucking exhausting, im trying to change the topic but i doubt they're going to stop. they post two posts at the same time echoing the same shit every single time within seconds of each other trying to pretend its not just them

No. 15658

>>15657
stop getting baited

No. 15659

there’s some weirdo posting their sketchy links in the myah alanna thread in /snow/. i reported a chunk of the posts but didn’t get them all

No. 15660

>>14594
theres a bunch of anons sperging about fgm and circumcisions in the twitch thread, can we get a farmhand in there for cleanup

No. 15661

I'm so mad that since the thread was locked, there's actually so much high quality kpop milk to talk about.

No. 15662

>>15661
What, did an idol wear last season's shoes or gain 4 pounds or something? Take it to twitter.

No. 15663

>>15661 SAME especially with all the Mina/Jimin drama. It's really driving me crazy how the admins seemingly haven't given any update as to what is going to happen with the thread. Seriously,they should just autosage it or send it to /manure/.

No. 15664

>>15659 isnt there anywhere else we could move to while we’re waiting? This is taking way too long honestly

No. 15665

>>15664
samefag

No. 15666

>>15664
people have recommended crystal.cafe, but it seems pretty inactive

you're just going to have to wait for admin to make an announcement, farmhands did note that she was busy but she did pop her head in a few days ago so who knows

No. 15668

>>15662
You could always hide the thread like most anons do for shit threads they dont wanna see, you know.

>>15661
>>15666
>>15663

I knew that was gonna happen. I want to talk shit about kpop right now and the discord is very inactive too.

No. 15670

Pls never bring back kpop, ty.

No. 15673


No. 15674

>>15659
NTA but it's still going over there, the most that's happened is someone getting red text for nitpicking.

No. 15675

>>14594
bring the Kpop threads back
they're shitty but fun
maybe on autosage?

No. 15676

>>15675
can an admin or farmhand please just address this so we dont get this question every two days? its getting really annoying despite it being a valid question

No. 15677

gore in momokun thread

No. 15678

>>15676
>>15675
they've made statements about it. Read the thread. Its NOT coming back.

No. 15679

>>15678
except they said admin was going to make a final decision, which is why there's so many fucking questions about it >>15450

if admin or a farmhand could just concretely say "no please fuck off" that would end the fucking endless questions

No. 15680

anyone else been having posting issues on mobile? my phone has been taking forever to post, and my friend is having a similar issue.

No. 15681

>>>/snow/887859
This thread has been raided by someone named "Nacho" or "Boyd" for the past 3 days. They post almost constantly. Can you please ban them and delete all their posts, or just lock the thread so a new one can be made? They've completely ruined the thread.

No. 15682

>>15677
Still happening.

No. 15683

File: 1594254706165.png (16.75 KB, 790x258, nacho.PNG)

>>15681
Just to add some more context, here's a ctrl+f of the word "nacho". The word was only posted once before 5 days ago. In just 5 days the word's been posted 125 times, he or someone else keeps spamming a link to his site.

This honestly makes me feel like I'm going crazy. It's obviously a bunch of self posts by some newfag. Do mods even know this is happening?

No. 15684

File: 1594254892454.png (62.62 KB, 941x721, posts.PNG)

>>15683
last addition, other anons seem confused as well.
i noticed some bans in the thread so im wondering why farmhands are doing nothing about the obvious spam

No. 15685

Just lock that stupid incel thread on /snow/, we aint going nowhere at its just going to make the rest of the site unusable due to raids.

No. 15686

Raid of newfags from ig irony community i
n using emoji, not saging and namefagging. Farmhands doing nothing >>>/snow/1004003

No. 15687

Tranny porn in >>>/snow/1004385 Farmhands, why did you lock the thread only to unlock it an hour later

No. 15688

>>15685
>>15686
Please lock the >>>/snow/1003989 incel thread as these anons have posted. It seems 99% unintegrated newfags who aren't saging and are infighting. The "milk" provided is shit and posted in a completely unintegrated manner.
Also yeah the spoilered photos there are for shock value and nothing else.
Cancerous thread and no one seems interested in it except the people directly involved in the drama, so OP is kinda vendetta posting to top everything off.

No. 15689

>>15688
Samefagging but I forgot to mention that a good amount of the posts are from the males the thread is about.
Also holy crap I tabbed back to the thread to find like 10 NEW posts. Thread is basically serving as a damn chatroom for a handful of newfags. Many of whom outright state their identity.

No. 15690

>>15689
That thread is a huge disaster. It's not even milky because it's impossible to follow what they're talking about and who.

No. 15691

>>15688
Yeah and some fuckwit just posted a picture of Bianca devins

I did not need to see that

No. 15692

WTF there's gore in snow…wtf.

No. 15693

Genuine thanks to the farmhands, I have modded big groups of people before and the amount of shit that I have seen is absolutely terrible.

I have been lucky enough to not see the cp and more extreme gore posted in raids on this website, except what was posted in snow. So again thank you.

No. 15694

I swear to god if these bitches don't spoiler the current and future proana scumbag thread pictures I'm gonna burn this site down! Shit looks scary especially with flux on at night

No. 15696

Why is there a fucking sex life thread on /ot/? Apart from the op smelling like a scrotum from miles away, it should be in /g/ if anything.
The thread >>>/ot/581590

No. 15697

>>15688
i was saying this in the thread earlier lol. whats with all the raiding on /snow/? is it because of shane dawson?

No. 15698

>>15678
Nah, farmhands just said it was up to Admin-sama that hasnt given her final decision

So many worse threads that still exist like the ones where ppl keep posting CP and gore but kpop is what is banned?? Just leave it in autosage and we'll internally deal with our newfags… at least they don't post literally vomit inducing photos

No. 15699

so i got red texted for necroing the body mods thread in snow despite it being brought up in the suggestions thread, i used it because there was discussion about someone relative and there was a lot of interest? how is that necroing ffs

No. 15700

>>15699
Just ban evade like the rest of us, farmhands are absolute fucking cancer

No. 15701

>>15699
Necroing is fine as long as you have milk and are contributing something new (as stated in the rules). In your post all you did was ask what's up with a cow and posted a broken link to one of your posts on another board. It doesn't contribute anything, especially since no one can click the link and it just looks like a random bump. If you'd reposted the information from the comment you were trying to link, it would've been fine. Hope this helps.

No. 15702

>>15701
so if i add more info next time, i won’t get rebanned? that’s actually reasonable, thx

No. 15704

>>>/ot/582602
Some weird scrote posting, what's up with the scrotes recently?

No. 15705

>>15704
Probably due to reddit purges

No. 15706

>>15698
This. I never understood what was so bad about the Kpop thread. Like obviously twitter migration, but come on the worst moments on Kpop general were nothing compared to everyday business on other threads. And any stan spam died out when there was actually milk to talk about (which very sadly there is tons right now).

No. 15707

>>15706
I don't give a shit about kpop but I don't understand why half the threads that are shutdown here are. You can just hide threads you don't like and half the spilling over that is meant to happen I never see.

No. 15708

>>15706
nah the kpop threads were the non-drama board equivalent of the anisa threads, debatably even worse and if you can't see why their removal was a blessing you were probably a contributor to what made them so shit in the first place. good riddance to that cancer.

I will admit that AOA jimin ordeal warranted a mention in celebricows though

No. 15709

>>15708
i would agree except admin just allowed all the anisaspergs to migrate and take over the twitch thread, which literally solved nothing

i agree the kpop threads were fucking hard as fuck to use sometimes, especially right before they were locked because it was constantly getting derailed by persistent infighting despite other anon attempts at ignoring it

why doesnt the admin just make a fucking announcement veering this one way or another, im sick and tired of seeing anons ask every single day about whether its coming back

No. 15710

>>15709
there's something wrong with admin, she hasn't been heard from in weeks and the 'busy' thing from farmhands makes me think something happened because.. no she isn't lol.

No. 15711

>>15710
she popped in roughly a week ago in the beauty guru thread to tell everyone to merge threads, but otherwise she's been quiet

No. 15712

I wonder if the kpop thread will ever come back or farmhands and admin are just hoping we all stfu about it and forget… I do hope it comes back though since there is no good alternative place to discuss.

No. 15713

>>15683
>>15684
Jesus christ, this is giving me flashbacks to the pullfag spamming the same words repeatedly in the Venus thread.
I have no fucking idea how that didn't get locked especially when the samefag was spamming the thread nonstop for at least a whole day when it had already hit bump limit.

I've seen at least 3 different threads in the past couple of months alone looking similar to this and it often makes me feel like I'm having a psychotic episode, lol.

Why won't farmhands just open submissions for new farmhands already?? It's obvious they're either too lazy or busy to properly moderate shit anymore and it's clear that random anons in this thread alone could do a better job.

No. 15714

>>15712
It won't. Stop asking, tard. ♥

No. 15715

>>15712
they have a kpop section on PULL go there

No. 15716

>>15714
Has admin decided that

No. 15717

>>15716
you really think the farmhand just said that randomly after almost two months?

it's fucking gone, now everyone can finally move on and not have to see these stupid ass questions every single day

No. 15718

kpopfags just move to crystal.cafe now that we know for sure its not coming back

No. 15719

>>15718
Crystal.cafe is fucking dead
Will wait for Admin-sama personal statement.
The janitors here are all have burnout bc of the excessive and milkless onlyfans nitpicking

No. 15720

>>15719
If all the kpopfags move there it won't matter if it's "dead" because they'll be having lively discussions nitpicking depressed koreans. They never talk about anything else so other threads being dead won't affect them.

No. 15721

>>15720
>They never talk about anything else so other threads being dead won't affect them.
And that's where you're wrong anon, they bring such delightful additions to other thread such as screeching about twansphobia, whining about weeb strawmen and racebaiting all the fucking time.

No. 15722

>>15720
you would think the fucking farmhand saying "it wont come back" would make this endless /kpg/ sperging end but apparently not

can the admin please just make an announcement so these fags will finally fuck off

No. 15723

>>15716
>>15719
>>15722
Admin discussed this with us over a month ago. She agreed that kpg should stay locked and bringing it back as a containment thread in /manure/ would be a bad idea since containment never works.

There's a chance it will come back once we move to the new server (and I have no idea when that will be so don't ask) but until then it's gone.

No. 15724

>>15719
>I want to talk to the manager
Bruh

No. 15726

>>15725
it was the kpop spergs that were always crying transphobia and couldn't even let unlisted /xx/ exist, so don't hold your breath since admin is keeping the door open for them after server move

No. 15727

Why can't Charlotte Charms have her own thread again? She's not camming anymore and I feel like she is about as milky as somebody like Usagi Kou.

No. 15729

The "where are they now" thread on /pt/ has discussion about an underage girl who's allegedly been prostituting herself for drugs. I know a mod/farmhand removed the link to the pedo board that was posted, but the discussion is clearly drawing pedos looking for cp. Can it be removed?

No. 15730

Why is author cow thread on the first page, yet no new posts had been made?

No. 15732

>>15729
Yes farmhands, please do something about that thread.

>>15730
There was some unsaged russian spam yesterday which bumped the thread, seems the mods deleted the spam.

No. 15733

Some pedo (or troll) posting on /ot/
>>>/ot/585602

No. 15734

The shoe thread is a mess-its full of ot posts, white knights and ragging on some wierd doppleganger of shoe. Maybe if its a kind of general thread then yes, but atm most posts are just nitpicks of the younger lookalike.

No. 15735

Can you please take a look at the mess that is the gaijin gyaru thread? Why the fuck are anons in there insisting that lolcow is about "cancel culture"? Where did these unintegrated fools come from?

No. 15736

Scrote CP post in /w/ I want to die

No. 15737

hope farmhands are having a good day, thank you for the hard work. you too anons, love you silly things.

No. 15738

>>15735
they're probably from tiktoxic.

No. 15739

File: 1595305088378.jpg (194.67 KB, 1920x1080, x1080.jpg)

Since PULL is closing down im going to preemptively ask the mods to ban threads on Simply_Kenna/Cozy Kitsune and Bestdressed, just as a I mentioned on the PULL topic those two are cesspools of circlejerking, create major infighting, and are a breeding ground for humble bragging, even if the subjects were cow material (which they aren't, Kenna hasn't done anything of note in years, her thread is just nitpicking and claiming her autism is fake and users bragging about their own autism diagnosis, Bestdressed is just straight bullying the girl for being an unfunny libfem who dates white men).
These are the only ones I know for sure would be better off banned but I've seen some stuff of the Serena Lin and Michelle Moé threads that also make them worth checking out, Michelle's usually lead to ALOT of racebaiting.

No. 15740

we might need emergency hell week. PULL is closing

No. 15741

>>15740
just came on here to say the same thing, the farmhands probably need to preemtively ban topics and do an emergency hellweek.

pull is going down on wednesday, and it's going to be a bloodbath after that.

No. 15742

>>15741
>>15740
>>15739
Nyx let me know about the situation earlier, it's unfair to call a hellweek last minute when the staff hasn't had time to clear up their schedules in advance. However, it would be beneficial to list out cancer threads that should be locked or autosaged like so >>15739 I hope autosaging for the time being is sufficient enough.
The farmhand application is still open in case anyone forgot. https://forms.gle/4fBQYkG7VVbNp4VS7

No. 15743

>>15742
Was about to ask, and can we include belle delphine.

No. 15744

>>15743
we already have a thread for her, anon.

No. 15745

>>15744
To auto sage….

No. 15747

>>15743
>>15745
I don't see the point of autosage-ing belle's thread when /w/ overall is pretty quiet/slow. People should just learn to sage their nonmilk posts.

No. 15748

>>15747
/w/ should be closely monitored in general. I suspect when pull closes it'll get a lot livelier and the weenus threads'll be even more of a dumpster fire than they already are.

No. 15749

pull non-landwhales feel free to apply to be my refugee drama gf (vagina only, no inverted scrote)

No. 15750

File: 1595431192914.jpg (128.69 KB, 1080x283, 20200722_171650.jpg)

Admin-sama, you petty bitch…I love you

Inb4 Josh for the King of Autists throwing a tantrum.
> Boohoo, muh pure farm is under attack

No. 15751

>>15747
Here's the crazy thing, anon, people don't learn and don't care and most of them I promise don't read the rules or for specific boards before posting. Maybe you don't lurk /w/ enough, but the Venus thread, the Belle thread [considering there is a massive defending simp from PULL who will migrate here], and practically all of /w/ has mountains of constant unsaged posts, pearl clutching, and nitpicking. Add in PULL and it's going to be bad. It'll be less chaotic for the mods too if they just autosage for a bit and just look at reports when they can instead of having meaningless 'her toes are ugly' posts bumping threads.

No. 15752

i dont know if its pullfags or just other newfags but the linking with no related image context is happening in almost every snow-related thread, other anons are picking up for idiots who cant read the rules. none of the links are being archived either. and thank you for tard wrangling among the shitfest.

No. 15753

yesterday the site triggered a keygen threat for me when i clicked on the link to the sister forum, hehe. running win 10 on a brave browser, just wanted to give a heads up.

No. 15754

>>15750
this is honest to god the best thing admin has ever done

No. 15756

>>15750
just saw this, admin I love you lmfao

No. 15758

>>15750
This is why lolcow.farm is best farm.

No. 15759

Mods and farmhands, do you want us to report PULL newfaggotry and unsaged autism on our threads that aren't cancer?

No. 15760


No. 15761

So many retarded threads with unsaging because of pulltards holy shit and thinking their opinions and just saying stuff without proof is proof enough.

No. 15762

Classic jealous weeaboo PULL users are already attempting to make a thread about white/black girls living in Japan to nitpick at. It's going to be a Kenna kind of thread if it's not controlled.

No. 15763

>>15762
Most mods know our frequent IPs I think, unless people are using roams, but for the obvious newfags who make it clear they don't belong here with posts like what you are saying, I feel like a good, long ban, would do the trick repeatedly to some of them. If they want to argue it, let them and a mod or someone can review it, but it'll really stick it to them about how the site works.

What about a tag in there linking KF in the meantime due to the ban? lol

No. 15764

Can this pullfag get banned? They are posting in the wrong threads and cross posting spamming the same content.

>>>/snow/1012334
>>>/w/106666

Not even on topic and just instathot hate posting:
>>>/snow/1011375
>>>/snow/1011416
>>>/snow/1011325

No. 15765

Can we get pull thread moved to /snow/ so saging and other rules can be enforced?

No. 15766

Does lolcow still ban and delete tranny hate or did the mods and admins decide they care about women again?

No. 15767

>>15766
asherahsgarden.net

No. 15768

>>15767
twitter.com(asherahsgarden.net )

No. 15769

>>15768
Girl shut up with the tranny panic

No. 15773

The ridiculous photoshoppers thread was dead until PULL got deleted, I think. Now it got ridiculous in itself and it seems like vendetta posting or something, or out of insecurity, I don't know. It wouldn't be surprising if they all flocked there and/or keep flocking to specific threads where they feel "safe" and their dumb shit is even slightly tolerated.

No. 15774

>>15766
lol nice website

No. 15775

>>15769
this. i can't believe the troomers still won't leave the site even after being shown they aren't wanted.

>inb4 newfag radfems reeee about this being a site made by women for women

the first admin was a man.

No. 15776

>>15775
read in the same tone as "the first pride was a riot"

No. 15778

>>15777
Nobody's getting kicked out, it's just that nobody wants to hear from you

No. 15779

i wish admin would enforce the rules about gender crit posts

also i vote for /w/ to be merged with /snow/, it was a good idea but it is dying

thanks based admin

No. 15780

>>15779
>>15775

Same. I’ve been here since 2014 but I barely use the site anymore. I really hoped that the admin would be able to improve things but there has been little progress and I think there probably isn’t going to be. The trans and gendercrit derailing has been going on since 2016 and the admin should have done more to combat it instead of them turning a blind eye and leaning into it. They need to be more proactive if they want to retain any of their original userbase but I think the damage is probably done, the site is so slow now and there seems to be very few long time users, even with them finally enforcing some new rules about it this year you still see it pop up in every single thread.

No. 15781

>>15780
i agree. the new admin and team are trying their best, but the old admin just let that shit burn. admin obviously has done a great job, and is likely dealing with other shit (legal threats, keeping the site going etc.) but these users just make the site so volatile. and no, i don't want the site full of men or trans or tradthots or anything, but i also don't want political bs of any kid thrown into threads. it's not an us vs. them, and they don't get it. i just want the site to be more apolitical, or atleast less of a "with us or against us" mentality, but these users won't allow for that, their opinions are always fact and everyone else is always wrong. i just wish they understood that not wanting x doesn't mean you actively want the alternative.

No. 15782

>>15780
>>15781
>>15779

you barely use the site so why should anyone care what you think? Every time I see someone complaining about this it's someone new to the site/a kpop fan. I'm saying this as someone who was in here complaining about gender crit derailing before the creation of /xx/.

it honestly sounds like a lot of you can't deal with imageboard culture and I think a forum with registered accounts will be better for you. The more admin shuts down convo the harder people will push. Imageboards are never going to be what YOU want them to be, they're going to be about whatever the vast majority want. The vast majority apparently want to sperg about trannies. There's honestly not a lot of tranny derailing if you stay out of /ot/ anyway. or if there is I'm not sensitive enough to see it.

Better yet if people had just let /xx/ live you'd have a legit argument about retards going off-topic. But y'all had to scream about it. And now it's gone and you are all still in here complaining about it. You don't want the derailing to stop, you want a hugbox.

No. 15783

A lot of salt in here from anons that both barely use the site but also see constant derailing simitaniously. Maybe you guys should take part in the site instead of just hiding in here crying about people being mean to men

No. 15784

>>15775
The absolute idiocy dripping from this post. The admin isn't going to kick out the people you personally are annoyed by. This isn't your secret clubhouse you mong.

No. 15785

>>15782
>redditspacing

No. 15786

>>15782
I'm tired of seeing this argument in /meta/ but I just wanted to say that I agree with post. You have to draw the line somewhere if you want to retain the imageboard culture.

No. 15787

>>15782
i'm glad imageboards don't actually work like this, otherwise everytime a lot of newfags came to the board the culture would change. i suppose we should give into PULL overlords instead of trying to make them integrate huh.

No. 15788

>>15782
Even though I barely use it now because I’m not interested in talking about trans people and it moves so slowly I’ve still contributed a lot to it over the years and still am a user of it? Is there some minimum amount of posts per day you need to make a suggestion in meta lmao?

What you’re saying is so stupid, imageboards always try and get new users to integrate and preserve the intended board culture. Just because there were loads of anachan posts at one point doesn’t mean they were ever necessarily a majority and doesn’t mean we should have just let the spergs continue? All image boards have rules. And why should people have to ‘stay out of /ot/?’ This isn’t a radfem/gc site and /ot/ isn’t a radfem/gc board. If they’re derailing it doesn’t matter what board it’s in the admin should still do something about it and clearly there are plenty of people who feel that it is.

The /xx/ part is also stupid like we have to give them a board in order to have the right to complain about it, why? These users are consistently so entitled. Why do we owe them anything? Did you make a special board for anisa spergs? Robots? Anachans? Plus they do have asherahsgarden or whatever anyway.

No. 15789

>>15788
Asherah's garden had malware

No. 15790

>>15789
Then don’t use it, that’s no one here’s problem. It doesn’t mean you should just have free reign to ruin every thread here with unintegrated derailing.

No. 15791

>>15790
Tranny

No. 15792

Any time I read anything gendert critical it's on /ot/ and the majority of anons are on the gender crit side.

No. 15793

>>15780
I'm part of the og userbase and I think hurt tranny feelings are the smallest issue with the website right now.

>>15788
>These users are consistently so entitled. Why do we owe them anything?
>whine and bitch to staff as loud as possible about radfem thread, they close it
>whine and bitch to staff as loud as possible about gendercrit thread, they close it
>whine and bitch to staff as loud as possible about /2X/, they close it in favor of the vocal minority
>whine and bitch to staff as loud as possible about pinkpill thread, they close it
>whine and bitch to staff as loud as possible about calling out tranny and men posts, they enforce bans even harder
>STILL whine and bitch endlessly

No. 15794

>>15793
What are you trying to say? People pointing out constant derailing and infighting they see to staff in the general issues thread in /meta/ aren’t equivalent to the ones actually doing the derailing and infighting all across the site

No. 15795

>>15789
NTA, but no it didn’t lmao. I literally use it. You guys are just making up shit now.

No. 15796

There is no reason to not use the other site if you want to discuss gender critical theory and radical feminism in free reign. If anyone hates it so much here they should be happy to know it's a different staff and admin.

No. 15797

We think Shayna got caught selfposting in her own thread. Any way to expose her posts?

No. 15798

>>15773
It wasn't lively but it certainly wasn't dead. Posts have definitely increased since pulltards got a hold of it though.

No. 15799

>>15797
yes please

No. 15800

>>15794
I'm saying someone else is now the entitled one here. And coming here vaguely complaining about the same thing over and over again, anons disagreeing with you/"infighting", is barely pointing something out. What you are doing is unproductive and borderline useless. Use the report function and name specific posts or threads so staff can act properly.

No. 15801

Can Canyon's posts be marked in the Tessah thread?

No. 15802

File: 1595948842849.png (17.03 KB, 706x430, roflmao.png)

>>15784
I literally received a permanent ban for this post:
>>15766

No. 15803

>>15802
That happened to me the other day. I think it was a mistake because the reason was unspecified like mine, and now I'm unbanned after having a cry to admin.

No. 15805

>>15802
they've said their peace on gender crit. Just drop it and tranny talk and maybe you'll stop getting bans?

No. 15807

>>15803
>>15805
I think it's retarded to ban someone from bitching in a thread specifically made for complaints.

No. 15808

I have a complaint about myself. I keep forgetting to embed video links. How do I change it?

No. 15809

>>15808
Maybe tie a string around your finger to remind you.

No. 15812

>>15782
>>15793
it's not about me. it's that i care about our reputation. i like LC. people see us as a radical extremist hate site that should get shut down. ask your friends who use other chans. none of them take us seriously lol. i'd just hate to see LC go down the same path as KF. /xx/ was great but it's in every thread now. a solution could be that any amount of sperging about off-topic political opinions in unrelated threads should be considered derailing. sorry for causing infighting by stating an opinion

No. 15813

There’s a lot of GC derailing in the celebricows thread

No. 15814

>>15812
Why are you defending lolcow as if we have some sort of internet recognition. The whole point is to post here without even tipping cows too. You have got to be from PULL. It's been here for years and never heard someone talk about 'protecting lolcows reputation'. This is some cringey shit.

No. 15815

>>15812
>ask your friends who use other chans. none of them take us seriously lol.
Most other imageboards are worse than this one, and who the fuck takes any imageboard seriously?

No. 15816

>>15814
not looking to argue, don't really care, i just know a lot of people who do things online and that's been my experience. take it or leave it

No. 15817

>>15813
They're talking about JK Rowling, cool your tits or whatever. There's only one post crying about it being off topic. And your post here of course.

No. 15818

>>15817
What? There’s loads of posts replying to it sperging about trannies. Also it was a random blog on ontd about who still follows jk, that’s not celebrities news, the original post wasn’t relevant to the thread

No. 15819

>>15812
>people see us as a radical extremist hate site that should get shut down
>people
>us
No one here cares what your twitterfriends think anon.

No. 15820

>>15819
>radical extremist site
You think they would use 'cyberbooling' or 'hate site'

No. 15821

Can we please do something about the pronoun derailing that happens in every single thread about a trans person? Not the ones specifically talking about fakebois/girls, those are free game, but other threads that aren't even about a cow's gender always end up derailing with people criticising someone for calling a cow he/she.

No. 15822

>>15821
There is already a listed statement that it will get you banned. In this very board. >>>13215

No. 15823

>>15812
>implying LC had any reputation to begin with
>implying imageboards can have a good reputation
>caring about what people on the internet think
Friend, this is a gossip site where you see every sort of nitpicking and sperging. Are you really saying that picking out a woman's body endlessly is more good and righteous than uttering the word "tranny"?

No. 15824

>>15822
Mods don’t seem to do anything about pronoun police reports half the time. I don’t fucking care if someone who IRL knows Fahr calls them “he”, I want the milk, but the Pronoun Police just have to derail.

No. 15825

i have another issue, it seems that every time i post an issue in the issues thread it gets derailed with infighting and pointless arguments. thanks for putting up with us admin

No. 15826

Autosage the vivadrag thread already

No. 15828

Can the “Welcome former PULL users!” link not be redirected through tinylink? Could it just be a direct link instead?

No. 15829

>>15812
>people see us as a radical extremist hate site that should get shut down. ask your friends who use other chans. none of them take us seriously lol.

Amazing. Thanks for the keks anon.

No. 15830

>>15782
i agree with you anon. shame PULL is kill, we will now be infested with more "uwu d-don't heckin make fun of the trannerinos!!!" types in every single fucking thread.

No. 15833

>>15830
cool. so it's not a gossip site then, it's an anti-trans site in disguise. this whole three years, i thought we were just talking shit. thanks for clarifying anons!! i hope you heal from your hate someday.(no1curr)

No. 15834

>>15833
it's neither a gossip site nor an anti-trans secret society. it's just an imageboard. stop caring

No. 15835

>>15830
Nah. They are nitpicking and putting theur opinions out and when you mention nedding proof and stuff they spazz. Its so telling.

No. 15836

>>15833
Sure. If that keeps you out, stfu.

No. 15838

>>15836
nah it just sucks to be part of a community for so long and watching all the nice sane people leave until all we're left with is perpetually pissed off cat ladies trying to push 19th century politics on anyone still here

also in a previous post, maybe 'reputation' was the wrong word. i meant more that i have seen outsiders disregard information posted here due to the site's overall political framing, and assume the lolcow is a victim of the internet hate machine, as opposed to being just a shitty person getting shit on

again, not trying to argue, just observing a pattern and commenting on it

No. 15839

>>15833
look anon I don't care for the anti tranny sperging either and I'm a filthy libfem, but there's one simple way to deal with it on a board: ignore it and don't be a fucking pussy about it

No. 15840

>>15839
you can't be serious. ignoring them is what people have been doing that let them get comfortable using the site. the real reason they are using this site is because they can easily control us since we don't have men. that's why they use so many female directed insults like tranny/handmaiden/pickme, they are power tripping over not getting their shitty discussions shut down by men. that's why they act like anyone disagreeing is a man, they're using the fact that we are all women to subdue any opposition. it's a shitty scare tactic. i honesty don't care if someone is radfem, libfem or even trad, just don't push your shitty opinion on everyone and claim people who disagree are men in order to justify yourself.

No. 15841

>>15840
you sound like a scrote

No. 15842

>>15840
I completely agree with you, but I don’t think anything is going to be done because all of the sane people left like you said and there just doesn’t seem to be enough will from the current team of mods

No. 15844

>>15839
>>15840
they want to make this a radfem imageboard so bad, is boring

No. 15845

>>15844
/ot is turning into racebait-central atm with LSA-fags crying about mixed people, white women and shit like that (seriously the unpopular opinion thread is a dumpster fire) but you're complaning about some anons using the word "tranny" once. Priorities.

Inb4 you evil radfem!
I was annoyed by the PP sperging leaking everywhere last year, that and the incessant "hi scrote" and " you,handmaiden". But there's no such thing today. And no, someone bringing the Wachosky in the Celebricow thread isn't GC/PP derailing.

No. 15846

>>15845
Nta but literally no one is stopping you making a complaint in /meta/ about racebait or reporting it. Whenever anyone complains about gc/pp sperging in /meta/ you get a bunch of mini mods coming into the thread to insist ‘it literally never happens!!’ Or do the whataboutism you’re doing now

Also most of the racebait I see is from gc anons saying they don’t care about racism if the victim is a man or that people only care about blm because it affected men etc. I looked in the unpopular opinion thread and all I can see is one anon saying that they were glad George Floyd was killed because he had a prior dv charge, that’s obviously something from a gc anon not an lsa anon

Also >there’s no such thing today
>>15841
Literally two posts above yours lmao

No. 15847

>>15840
It's an imageboard and you will see things you don't like. Go back to twitter if you like to play thought police so much.

No. 15848

>>15847
i also don't understand this. this is newfag shit more than anything else that gets posted here. image boards are one of the least accepting places to post. there are so many rules on image boards more than places like reddit about how the userbase needs to act and integrate(no unique typing styles, no emojis, no avatarfagging) there are rules about context that gets posted, topics are constantly banned, groups of users are constantly banned (anachans, munchies) and yet whenever radfem shit is called out, you act like the site is the wild west. it's not. radfems are the ones who need to integrate, not the other way around. radfems are the new unwelcome userbase that refuse to understand how this site works, what it's for and why our userbase is the way it is. if you guys went on any other board and read what's on it instead of just popping in yo derail threads about trannys you'd know what i mean. but please, keep ignoring admin and farmhands and site rules.

No. 15849

While you guys are infighting I just have to wonder why farmers constantly accuse each other of being scrotes. It always happens when a girl isn’t being teehee feminine enough. Sage for rhetorical shitpost.

No. 15851

>>15848
Not all of us are radfems, just gc, and from what I've seen most of them respected the rules. In my experience imageboards are quite literally the wild west because the rules are loose.

No. 15852

>>15849
because it's easier for them to put down opinions if they are convinced the person isn't a woman. the same reason people use handmaiden and pick me as an insult, it's a lot easier to dismiss women who you think go against your ideologies because you justify that they are just idiots who are weaker than you. so either you're a man or a shittier woman than they are.

No. 15853

>>15852
Pretending not to be a man won't make your argument any more convincing(bait)

No. 15854

>>15853
nice larp

No. 15855

>>15852
Ok for everyone here: i’m the best woman in the world ok bye thnx.

No. 15856

>>15851
>imageboards are quite literally the wild west because the rules are loose.

which image boards exactly? the rules are looser on certain subjects but there is tons of censorship on them, even on 4chan. hell, 4chan having shitty strict rules is why this site exists in the first place. most image boards are poorly run and you can tell more because they are small sites. also GC anons were fine before the thread was over run with radfem rhetoric. i remember having real conversations in those threads but they devolved even before the merge to the point that anons would rip on you for not saying mean shit about men. i remember getting ripped on for sympathizing with jazz because he was clearly fucked up by his mom's lust for fame. there's also tons and tons of backlash when criticizing things stupid shit if it has to do with women, you can't hate something because it's stupid, it's automatically not stupid since women do it even if it's shit that pick mes do. why? it's like these people just want to argue, that's what i don't like. i could care less about their dumb rhetoric but they are such nasty humans.

No. 15857

>>15853
this is the kind of dumbass pathetic shit i was talking about. i only mention radfems so often because they shit the loudest. radfems are pretty crazy because they just blame everything on everyone else but them (other women included), which is probably why they are so volatile. they make everything into a shitty argument when most of us don't give enough of a shit about those topics day to day. being a woman sucks. men suck. but i just got home from work and i don't care if you think calling some tranny a woman is a horrible offense to women, i just want to read about their shitty e-drama.

No. 15858

>>15857
Male rage detected kek(bait)

No. 15859

>>15857
ok wow i didn't know until just now that there was a difference between radfem and GC. you might be onto something anon. that honestly explains a whole fucking lot. like it's possible to be critical of gender issues while having trans friends and not hating all men & the "pretend men" as they put it

No. 15860

I don’t see why my henry shitposting was against the rules tbh. Just came here to say that. If you moderate at least moderate this messy thread here.(ban evading vagina haver)

No. 15861

>>15859
there definitely is a difference. i am GC personally, but not because of the same reasons as a lot of radfem GCs are. and other people who are GC irl have similar feelings as me. most people i know who are GC, men and women, are those in the medical field.

No. 15862

All of the junky, sub, methadone experts keep flooding the thread with bullshit and there’s a whiteknight who wants to defend TND.
SOS

No. 15863

>>15860
why is this post marked "vagina haver"? kek

No. 15864

>>15833
>this whole 3 years
>noooo this heckin wholesome site with hundreds of threads making fun of people isn't being a heckin wholesome 100 uwu trannyfucker to men larping as women!!
>noooo don't heckin imply trans women aren't real women!!
>noooo you can't heckin say trannies aren't real women!!!
kek just go back to twitter already then and post about how much you hate a heckin transphobia if words make you this upset, you absolute spastic

No. 15865

>>15812
>people see us as a radical extremist hate site
Good. I don't want goody two shoes moralfags infesting this site and derailing cow threads by getting their feelings hurt by anon using the term faggot or something. The ironic thing is that LC is probably one of the tamest imageboards out there compared to most 4chan ones and what warrants us this "extremist hate site" status is that the majority of our userbase thinks trannies are insane and that men suck for abusing women. Lmfao. How controversial!

No. 15866

>>15845
Seriously, I almost never see "GC derailing" now unless anons have the lowest standards for it, literally saw someone being extremely triggered over using the word tranny or something very generic like that and they were calling it "dissecting GC theory", implying that this was the great GC debate derailing present on the board. But racebait on the other hand has always been the worst problem to me personally, even before the banishment of pinkpill and GC. It shits up the thread in two seconds because a.) it never fucking ends, someone will always bite the bait and resuscitate it after it has cooled down and b.) it happens all the time. I always report it but it only seems to work like 50% of the time.

>>15846
>people discussing how hypocritical it is that movements like BLM being ignited by the death of a violent man and ignoring the deaths of innocent women is "racebait by GC anons" now
see if your standards for "GC sperging" are this it's no wonder you think it's all over the fucking board

No. 15867

To be honest I genuinely think at this point if you really disagree with how the site is being run the best thing to do is just stop using it. There’s not going to be some huge change, it’s been steadily going in this direction (and people have been complaining about it in /meta/) for over 4 years now. It’s clearly not something the mods or admin care about or are capable of doing anything to fix and too much damage has already been done to the original user base. The current user base is obviously small, in /ot/ I’m pretty sure there’s like 30 active posters. Just let them talk among themselves until the site inevitably dies. The old board culture isn’t going to come back and it isn’t going to improve, and it’s clearly not productive to bring it up in /meta/.

No. 15868

Can admin mark the obvious Canyon posts in the Tesah Jordin thread in /snow/? Not sure if it's conducive for milk flow but I thought I'd ask anyway.

No. 15869

NOTICE

Thread has reached 1100 posts. The thread will be locked and you will be unable to post in it shortly after it exceeds 1200 posts. Please begin preparing a new thread and post a link to it when it's created.

No. 15870

>>15833
>"I can excuse talking shit of people -mostly women- for years and nitpick them to death, but I draw the line at making fun of men in dresses!"

No. 15871

>>15838
>and watching all the nice sane people leave
lmao have you actually seen the old threads here?

No. 15872

>>15867
admin is the one trying to get rid of the radfems to restore the board culture, are you just ignoring that? people are complaining because the users that admin already said aren't welcome won't leave because they don't have anywhere to go.

No. 15873

There is some sperg roaming through the Japan sex workers and Lorena threads and making them even worse they already are. They are obsessed with some has-been wanna-cow named Nadine and are same fagging all over the place.

No. 15874

>>15802
And yet I am still permabanned for this post.

Hey Admin. Why? Because you hate that people use this website to talk about how we hate trannies in threads about trannies?

No. 15875

>>15874
Thanks for reminding them why you are banned and that you're evading.

Don't include other people besides you, anon. Seems you've brought up GC enough that the mods got tired of it.

No. 15876

>>15875
newfag

No. 15878

>>15863
Sounds like this poster whom I called Fellow Vagina Haver lol
>>>/ot/594092

No. 15880

>>15872
They do have somewhere to go (asherahsgarden) and they still aren’t leaving. Admin has stated they have radfem mods, there is clearly not enough will within the staff to do the actual things that would be needed to have any meaningful improvement of the situation (permanent bans for repeat offenders/ people who only come here to sperg about gc, a new mod team, getting rid of rules and threads that will only serve to continue to attract these people). The admin has clearly decided she wants the fate of the site to be the same 5 people calling each other pick mes until the site just inevitably dies. It’s stupid for long term users to continue to waste their time complaining in /meta/ or trying to improve the site when it’s been years and nothing has really improved and clearly isn’t going to.

No. 15882

>>15840
>they are power tripping over not getting their shitty discussions shut down by men
Ikr?? How terrible! You're right fellow sister, those fucking catlady terf radfem bitches really need to be put down a notch by some proper chad dick. Thank you for speaking for us REAL SANE users of lolcow.farm.

Btw pls remove the no announcing phallus rule

No. 15884

>>15874 In your other post history >>15766 you have nothing but mention of gender critical topics and constant whining about wanting the threads back, which you know isn't going to happen. You have another website where you can talk about anything you want but you choose to come into this thread to cry and victimize yourself.
You not only post low effort bait insinuating that we delete posts mentioning troons which has never happened, your newfaggotry also implies that there are multiple admins and if we decided if we care about women again, as if we aren't women with our own lives to worry about while moderating this site to be free of gore, scrotes, spam, and whatever else people complain about. All you have in that post history is accusing the site of being run by TRAs despite the fact there is a active MtF thread in /snow/ and multiple cows on this site that identity as fakebois or women.
>Because you hate that people use this website to talk about how we hate trannies in threads about trannies?
No actually, you don't use the proper MtF thread, you want to be allowed to derail every single /ot/ thread as you please. You have over 30 bans recorded, at least four that are related to racebait or race derailing and multiple bans for responding to bait. Maggots like you can't be bothered to go to the other site for no reason other than wanting a soapbox. Nobody is forcing you to stay here. You're not being oppressed because two thread topics were removed from /ot/ on a imageboard, get a grip.
>>15880
You should ask yourself why admins here have a short shelf life.

No. 15886

>>15884
i hate when admin gets ratty and reads back people's post history in a "get rekt lul" style

No. 15887

>>15886
youre the crudite at a party. i fuckin love it.

No. 15888

>>15884
>Anon commits constant ban evading with a track record in racebaiting and obsessive bitching about troons and refusal to post in the MTF and fakeboi threads like every other sensible GC person on the site does
Hmmm! It's like we have a suspicious bait master at work instead of an evil ratfem strawman but what do I know.

No. 15889

That or admin has no idea what she's talking about and this is like the time she revealed the post history of Opera VPN

No. 15890

>>15884
You're right. Ever since you banned all general GC talk I've used proxies because I knew bringing up actual criticism of the community and it's leaders would get me banned.

To me it seems your only interest is keeping lolcow as a gossip website - which would be fine but then why have places like /ot/, /g/ and /m/? It seems hypocritical to me. The other website exists, but it's a matter of principle to me at this point that a website that is supposed to be run by women shuts down talk criticising our biggest oppressors. You should've let /xx/ stay up and rightfully shut down discussion elsewhere on the website, but you chose to delete it despite the majority wanting it to stay.

Now the racebaiting stuff and the 30+ ban records are probably from one of the proxies I have used. I don't care personally about racial discussion here. I care about preserving freedom of speech for women when it comes to women's rights and it doesn't seem like you do. That is why I criticize.

No. 15891

>>15884
This was juicy to read, thank you for flexing your muscles admin-sama.

No. 15892

>>15890
youre the only one constantly arguing about it. Go to 4chan.

No. 15894

>>15890
Thinking IP hopping creates "I Am A Hacker" personas. Lol. We all get you're trolling at this point. Admin can device ban, you know?

No. 15895

>>15894
Kek, backread /meta/ for a while and see how false that is

No. 15896

File: 1596382151473.gif (355.38 KB, 220x220, headache.gif)

>>15890
please stop. im hangover and this secondhand cringe made me sick.

please just leave. go outside, go talk to other humans. please, put that phone down and put on your shoes and go outside.

No. 15897

>>15895
The fact that you don't know they can do that is going to be even better when they do.

No. 15898

>>15889
holy shit how many times has she done that?

No. 15899

Spoilered images have been posted in the BL threads for years but you just now decided to ban and delete posts without warning? Are you actually retarded?

No. 15900

>>15899
Looks like someone is reporting old posts.

No. 15901

>>15900
They’re deleting years old posts to pretend this wasn’t the case, looks like a lolcow is triggered

No. 15902

>>15895
clearing cache/cookies only helps people who are permabanned read the site.

No. 15903

>>15899
Perhaps read the rules for /m/ before posting there.

No. 15904

>>15903
How about precedence means something??? What about the 20 fetishes and sex advice and femdom threads in /g/ dumb whore?
>posting pornography is prohibited
Those rules meant to deter males spamming porn threads, spoilered images relevant to topic discussion were always allowed. What even constitutes NSFW anyway? Pictures of clothed people tied up not showing genitalia aren’t any less NSFW.
Clarify rules and announce changes. Suddenly pulling the rug from under people can’t not look like a salty moralfag vendetta.

No. 15905

>>15904
nsfw means illegal to view in public, like you know, nudity. you yaoifags wouldn't even have a thread if not for the raging retards who reeee about how harmless it is.

No. 15906

>>15903

newfaggot farmhand on a power trip confirmed; you ran out of things to moderate ? how can it be any thing but unfair when rules were handled on different basis prior

>>15905

that thread has existed for 4 years with minimal problems, people keep to theirselfs but bitches like you would come in it to bait anons there didn't even bother to report you

SJW yaoisperg ass mad again and we're entertaining it this time, the absolute state of lolcow

No. 15907

>>15905
So you gonna answer my questions or just keep clutching them pearls, anime pictures aren’t illegal to view in public lmao you’re from Twitter

No. 15908

>>15905
That’s not at all what nsfw means

No. 15909

>>15908
yes it is. unless you really think it literally means stuff your boss would be mad at. sexually suggestive things and gore are generally not included in nsfw. blue boards can have all the fully clothed smut they want.

No. 15910

>>15909
Where do you get that from? I see that type of thing marked nsfw all the time. Because it is/was about work or just general public.

No. 15911

>>15910
it was like that here for one, but most imageboards have been pretty lax barring full nudity. not saying that's good or bad but just how it was. a lot of people interpret it as anything that may get you fired as if being on 4chan or the like wouldn't, but looking at sexual nudity in public is considered indecency.

No. 15912

>>15903
That rule isn't enforced in other threads though.

No. 15913

>>15912
Hideous art is the only thread I can think of where the no-porn rule is not applied.

No. 15914

>>15913
There was porn of Light in the husbando thread (but I guess it's sort of censored?) and Todoroki with whats his name in the shipping thread.

No. 15915

>>15913
There's a ton of porn in various fetish threads on /g/ and also in the femdom thread. Not to mention the cow boards which have nudes posted literally all the time. Shayna's vagina is always open for everyone to see.

No. 15916

The posts were obviously reported by some anti-fujo sped from Twitter, and the farmhand that got the reports happened to be a faggot who sided with them. I think it's interesting that anons were banned for porn and not the infighting that people were trying to end by posting porn.

If you're so suddenly so stringent about this rule that's literally never been enforced before, then go back and delete every other instance of porn in /m/, or at least move the hideous art thread to /ot/.

No. 15917

Pullfags have invaded ridiculous photoshoppers with racial purity bullshit as expected.

No. 15918

>>15916
>obviously
Seriously, quit sperging about your boogeyman everywhere and accusing everybody of being the one reported you. Plus ironically you'd likely be allowed to post that kind of "art" on twitter.

No. 15919

>>15904
Im one of the anons who reported them. I don't go to that thread but no, not all of it was spoilered. I don't know what exactly farmhands cracked down on, but there were 4 recent pictures without a spoiler. I saw them while scrolling normally. It also wasn't light bondage, it was hardcore gay gangrape bondage hentai that I reported. One of them had two dicks in one boys ass, and one had a dude being pinned down to eat ass while crying.

If you think those are light BL, you're a degenerate.

No. 15922

>>15919
Literally lying lol

No. 15923

>>15917
Ever since PULL closed retards won't stop accusing anybody who they disagree with of being from PULL and it's fucking annoying. You can't call someone a pullfag just because they disagree with you, we get it, I think PULL was ridiculous and nitpicky too but it's such a bad cop out. Please stop.

No. 15924

>>15923
I agree, I feel like in general ‘go back to pull/lsa/twitter/tumblr/‘ etc should be considered low contribution/ report worthy when that’s literally all the post is or at least it should be discouraged.

No. 15925

>>15916
>posts unspoilered gangrape porn
>gets mad people report it and farmhands dish out bans

You have now sperged about your porn being deleted on /ot/, /g/ and /meta/ Just take your L and shut up finally gangrape-chan

No. 15926

>>15923
>Ever since PULL closed
Pullfags not intergrating has been a problem for years, if not the first instance of new off-website users being an issue. And anons have been regulary calling it out for just as long.

No. 15927

>>15926
When every user starts throwing out "pullfag" as an insult when they're butthurt over someone disagreeing with them, it's annoying and stupid. And there's been an uptick in it happening since pull closed, and now everytime someone disagrees with another anon they accuse them of being from pull.

No. 15928

>>15923
>>15924
Saying "Go back to PULL/Twitter" has been a thing since this site was created. Stop making bad posts and maybe people wouldn't tell you to leave lmao. Nobody wants to entertain your bad opinions here.

No. 15929

>>15928
>bad opinions
t. black and white thinking

No. 15930

I love that there's a constantly growing list of things you can't accuse people of.
>Hi _____

No. 15931

>>15930
It's all due to the same thing though. It always, always leads to infighting.

No. 15932

>>15930
maybe don't be dismissive on purpose to cause drama like a retard.

No. 15933

Can you do something about the artist salt thread in /ot/? It's being derailed by fights.

No. 15934

>>15933
This, why are farmhands suddenly activating to hand out multiple redtexted bans for posting spoilered NSFW images in a thread that has had them for years and suddenly giving snarky ban messages to posts that aren't even derailing but these posts are left unattended despite multiple people reporting them:

>Literally sexism doesn't even matter in American society. Go cry in a third world country and see how women are being treated over there and you'll see just how good American women really have it you entitled whore.


>I don't think calling me a scrote really invalidates the argument. Women don't experience sexism in America anymore. and that's coming from a woman who has NEVER experienced misogyny. It's a myth, I swear, you are all safe from those scawy men I swear.


Please explain because I want to know what's the reasoning.

No. 15935

>>15909
>illegal to view in public
>gore is not nsfw

anon you are literally retarded

No. 15937

>>15935
not trying to rehash this argument but technically that's correct. you legally can't look at porn in public because of minors. calling something not safe for work is disingenuous because it requires you to know what your specific boss will fire you for.

No. 15938

>>15937
>you legally can't look at porn in public because of minors

This is quite literally not true and took my 5 seconds to find this out by googling it. Nice job pulling it out of your ass though.

You can't show minors or anyone that doesn't want to see it. But that involves the act of SHOWING them. Not them accidentally seeing you looking at it.

No. 15939

>>15938
are you stupid? it's not a federal law but most states and most public locations prohibit it. in my state you can get charged with disorderly conduct and end up on a sexual predator list.

No. 15940

>>15939
I'm not stupid, I actually did research unlike you.

It took all of 5 seconds to figure it out. You said it as if that applied to everywhere, you didn't even clarify with something like "Well, in my state".

What state do you live in so I can look up your state penal codes and prove you wrong – AGAIN.

Either way, did some more research:

>"According to Prof Clare McGlynn from Durham University who specialises in the law around porn, there's little to stop someone viewing pornographic material in public - on public transport, in a library, in a park or a cafe, for example.


>"It's like reading a book," she says. "They are viewing lawful material which is freely available, and restricting people's access to it presents other challenges.""


You tried to make a blanket statement and got caught with your pants down looking retarded.

Anyways, I'm not gonna argue with someone that throws statements out like that and doesn't even think to check elsewhere to see if they're right first.

No. 15941

>>15940
>studying for your infight on /meta/

No. 15942

>>15941
>being retarded and not knowing the difference between "studying" and "research"

No. 15943

>>15942
>studying for your response to a response on your infight by googling the dictionary definitions of words

No. 15944

>>15943
kek ya got me

Anyways, I came here not to talk about porn but to ask that the farmhands get a run through of infighting versus flaming.

I've gotten into flame wars with people on here without any actual intention ob it being super serious and it's all banter. I've seen that a lot of ppl still get banned for infighting or get called out for infighting. The whole point of being here is to be catty and shit. So what the fuck is farmhands criteria for "infighting" and are they all aware of it?

Like can people actually not have arguments here (if it's relevant to the topic) and throw a few names here and there?

No. 15945

Will you consider moving the lefthots thread to /pt/? It's the most active it's ever been, constant content flowing in and the subjects are sperging about the thread on their social media (there hasn't been any cow tipping,the subjects are just narcs who obsessively Google themselves).

No. 15946

>>15945
>the subjects are sperging about the thread on their social media

this is a reason to not move it

No. 15948

File: 1596643910022.webm (1.44 MB, 448x472, visible confusion.webm)

>>15943
>>15934

…Is this you again gangrape-chan? Just take your L like the five previous farmers said. For a few days now you have been on every board sperging about your porn getting deleted. You posted your weird gay bondage gangrape porn and there were pictures without spoilers.

What happened is so obvious, random anons saw it and reported it. Farmhand(s) saw that the thread was out of control and deleted a few files and red texted a few posts from the past day or so. They even left in 90% of your degenerate porn up, are you trying to get them to remove the rest of it with this incessant sperg?

No. 15949

>>15948
>Anyone disagreeing with me about the site's moderation means they are one person pretending to be different people site-wide on different time zones

No. 15950

>>15948
Uhhhh… are you okay with your crazy vendetta? The point about blatant out of place misogynist infighting post in the artist salt thread being left alone and the anon posting them being allowed to keep on going when just a day ago they were deleting and handing out bans for petty reasons is a pretty valid complaint.

No. 15953

>>15951
You going to delete this post immediately after like you did in the costhot thread? As if that doesn't stop people from reporting the posts on the pages are already open.

No. 15956

>>15953
i hate when tryhards are like OH THIS IS LIKE THE REPLY YOU MADE IN THIS THREAD ISN'T IT like we get it you lurk every conceivable thread it's like that annoying kid showing off when they're called on in class

No. 15957

>>15956
I was saying that so the poster realizes that deleting the shitposts doesn't suddenly make them unreportable. Calm down.

No. 15958

>>15957
No. If you lurk so much you'd know everyone here is angry. Shut up calmfag

No. 15961

>>15958
> Shut up calmfag
based

No. 15962

>>15943
ot but I keked so much at this combo and now I kind of ship those two anons.

blame quarantine.

No. 15963

I wanna mock trannies and men again, we all wanna hate on em so why can't we?

All mods post hands

No. 15964

>>15940
This isn't even true. If you google it you can see that people have been arrested and charged in the past.

No. 15965

I don’t understand how the discord verification works, at all, bc I never use it almost never. What is the secret message. Am I just retarded???

No. 15966

>>15965
fuck off bot

No. 15967

>>15964
And yet, you provide no links. I did Google it. Were they masturbating? Did other people see it? It also matters if they were inside of a business or building or public transportation. How dare you come back and re-ignite this retarded ass argument days later without bringing any actual heat?

No. 15968

>>15963
everytime I come here it's always about trans, just go to KF, you'll fit in perfect there

No. 15969

>>15968
theyre rampant there tho

No. 15970

>>15966
Not a bot. I just used discord last time in like 2015. And I don’t understand it. Sorry for being a retard?

No. 15971

There are a bunch of unsaged posts tinfoiling about the race of Lauren Southern's kid in the tradthot thread. Is it a samefag sperging out? Maybe even a male, considering the bizarre obsession with the race of the guys she fucks. Weird af.

No. 15972

>>15969
most of them are equally self hating and want to talk shit too, it's a win win

No. 15973

>>15970
read pins

No. 15974

>>15968
Ait trannymod

No. 15975

>>15963
The MtF thread is active on snow

No. 15976

Possible CP on the /ot/ Lolita thread. I reported it.

No. 15977

>>15968
It's always the same falseflagging idiot trying to ignite infighting about trannies and manhate and bringing up the tranny janny legend, wouldn't be surprising if it's ham-chan trying to get attention again.

No. 15978

seems like two or three anons are shitting up the Funny Posts thread on /ot/ with crazy derailing about gay men. This thread has devolved into a huge mess over the last few days, I know it's in /ot/, but can the farmhands try to step in and sequester the insane infighting a little? I think the thread has good potential.

No. 15979

>>15978
Funny posts thread seems to be very prone to derailing. First bpdfag finnanon and her gross stories, then the ”gay men suck” stuff

No. 15980

So how does Admin even know if she isn't hiring trannies

No. 15981

>>15980
Who cares? There's no rule against being a tranny here kek

No. 15983

>>15981
>Who cares?

Well, if you hire trannies on a board that is mostly radgem or GC, you are bound to have a shitflinging, panties-in-a-bunch mod that can't handle discussions and hands out senseless bans.

No. 15984

>>15983
Not this shit again. Just because someone's trans (by the way, you're fucking retarded for thinking a woman must be a troon every time she disagrees with you or doesn't radfem sperg like you do) doesn't mean they'll sling shit. But also, again, who cares? If you don't like it, you can leave any time. Admin is the one in power, she's the one choosing mods, if you disagree with her choices then fuck off kek. Mods are not going to post hands only for terf retards to tinfoil about bulging veins or hand hair meaning it's a troon. Stop obsessing over trannies so much, holy fucking shit. They absolutely live in your head rent-free and they've clearly won your little made-up battle kek

No. 15985

>>15983
can you shut the fuck up? yes the bans are occasionally stupid but if a farmhand was actually a tranny it would be much more obvious bc trannies can't control their spergfests about muh twansfobia. Stop making radfems look like retards with your schizo tinfoiling.

No. 15986

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 15987

>>15984
>>15985

Wow can you both stop sperging the fuck out and calm down? I wasn't even TA that you were fucking talking to, I was just giving a reason why someone could /possibly/ give a fuck.

Damn. Y'all menstruating or something? Jesus fuck relax.

No. 15988

>>15987
>I can use hyperbole, lace my reply with extreme wording that provokes a reply, and look for an argument but you can't and when you reply to MY POST trying to instigate you must be on your period

No. 15989

>>15987
Samefag but I think it's funny that you both think that someone wouldn't do that, even subtly, if they were being talked shit against. It's just literally human nature to not want to allow a discussion about something against who you are as a person.

I'm a marginalized group and if people were autistically sperging about my group, I'd probably hand out bans but not all the time or even obviously enough to make it look like a trend. But randomly.

But I guess that's why I'm not a farmhand am I right?

No. 15990

>>15989
And what of it? It's human nature. Mods aren't robots. Why do we whine about playing fair on a fucking imageboard? Shit, i'd have fun with it as well

No. 15991

>>15989
Trannys arent ~marginalized~ if anything they have tranny privilege

No. 15992

>>15991
this is your brain on femcel

No. 15993

>>15989
>>15990
>>15984
>>15981
Why should Lolcow have tranny mods, though? This obviously isn't a site for awesome trans gals and their pals, kek. It'd just be mental self-harm. You can argue it's just a gossip site, but having /ot/, /g/ and anti scrote rules pretty much established it as a women's space, like it or not.
If anyone doesn't like that and wants a more inclusive community, maybe they could just go on CC and KF. God knows those places are full of troons and garden variety males looking to share their valuable opinions.

No. 15994

>>15993
Why shouldn't it. This isn't asherah's garden. Men are still allowed to post. The whole point of this place is that it's anonymous. It makes me laugh when anons talk shit about PULL being user-based but then obsessively try to police the type of person that can use this site and try to identify posters and it goes against the whole damn premise of an anonymous board. We don't want a more inclusive community, we don't give a fuck. You can have a voice-verified, user-based board if you're so set on it being female-only, but it's still not female only and under anonymity it never will be.

No. 15996

People be sippin retard juice in /ot/ and it seems to have traveled to /meta/ lol same shit

No. 15997

>>15994
>Why shouldn’t it.
For the reasons listed right there. Mental self-harm, and the simple fact that no one really wants that shit. Quick question, though, why do you think there’s a rule against men announcing their phalluses? Think hard on this. Really think.
Understand that you’re in the minority every time you seethe and call people femcels for not liking trannies or males in general. Even admin doesn’t like trannies. She’s shit on them before, and allows whole threads specifically for mocking and misgendering them, in case you didn’t notice.
You’re claiming you don’t give a fuck, but you clearly do. There’s no need for a special Discord (which is also very troon-friendly on most servers, might want to keep that in mind if you want a place to crash), this is Lolcow. If you want tranny jannies, make your own site or go to one that would support them. That isn’t here, so sorry.

No. 15998

>>15997
>think hard on this
No. Tl;dr, this site discourages men which is enough. If it becomes exclusively explicitly female-only the spinsters will go nuclear

No. 15999

>>15998
I agree that it's enough. I just don't understand why anyone would be angry about us not wanting a troon for a mod.
Did you not get the memo? Lolcow users aren't full on radfems, but that doesn't mean we want ejaculators with "I want to cut off my own penis and wear anime thigh highs" disorder running shit either.

No. 16000

>>15999
Yeah, this is where you're losing me. You're not entitled to know anything about any of the farmhands, let alone handpick which ones suit your ideology the best

No. 16001

>>16000
What ideology? Who's handpicking anyone? All anyone's said is that they don't want a tranny janny. There isn't even reason to believe the admin or mod team wants that right now.
Like I said, make your own site if that makes you so upset.

No. 16002

>>16001
Okay, not ideology, beliefs, point of view, opinion. Go ahead and pretend to not understand me for the sake of a reply again. Like I said, you're not entitled to know or dictate shit about the board, make your own imageboard if you get so triggered at the thought of a tranny janny.

No. 16003

>>16002
We're allowed to state we don't want trannies. This isn't a dictatorship, and this entire board exists because the admin and mods actually do want to hear our thoughts, and we're allowed to have a voice.
You can stay mad, but farmers will keep saying it because that's how they feel.

No. 16004

>>15994
>>15999
The maleposting rule is obviously on a don't ask don't tell basis, much like being 18+. Any males that post frequently tend to keep to themselves because they know their input isn't wanted. It's futile to control who posts on a anonymous board but certain characters can't help but out themselves for attention, and they will get perma-banned. The rules are definitely not an invitation for scrotes to try joining the staff team, even if tranny identified. It sounds like you want us to be more inclusive about who gets on staff and gets to give input on moderation and board changes. You don't need to be a radfem to enjoy a predominately anonymous space for women, but you're delusional if you think that means men deserve a seat at the table. I don't give a shit about who posts if the rules are followed but I know for a fact that not only cows but men have tried to infiltrate staff by various means. I also know that I'm not the only admin a male has tried to buy off for the site, and I know that so many people would love for this site to burn to the ground for many different reasons. I don't trust most applicants or their motives so what the hell makes you think I'm going to trust a male's motives on getting involved with the site at any capacity?
>>16000
>Yeah, this is where you're losing me. You're not entitled to know anything about any of the farmhands, let alone handpick which ones suit your ideology the best
You're right, I'm entitled to do that. I hope you're done baiting on /meta/ now because it's more entertaining on /ot/.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]