File: 1567798973179.jpg (44.23 KB, 500x327, 9a4839cfc7dba5689ce7269447b693…)
I haven't watched but the thumbnail looks like a video that you would only ever see on BET uncut (late night cable). Now it's just out there for girls to see easily.
Maybe the thumbnail is misleading and I'm too old.
I agree with you. Celeb women do not even register as actual women to me. They're like… plastic beings. I caught a glimpse of this cardi b x bernie sanders interview, and bernie looks like a (ugly, haggard) regular old man and cardi looks like a plastic doll.>>458837
I am not looking forward to that Stripper movie with JLo coming out and hoeism being cool for the next couple months.
I used to think I just hated rap/hip-hop because basically the only thing that gets popular is cumbrain/porn star aesthetic BS like this and Cardi B.
I wish more female rappers like Janelle Monae, Kilo Kish, Noname and Angel Haze were popular. It's never
them, and always this shit instead. I'm fucking tired of hearing about how great it is to be made of plastic and have straight sex. Pop music and culture is so annoying.
Y'all need some early 90s Queen Latifah in your lives if you don't have her there already. I actually didn't like the music as much at first but I loved the message in "U.N.I.T.Y." and really wished we heard more women rappers like this in the mainstream. It's grown on me so much musically and I just really love that this was a hit.
"Who are you calling a bitch?"
You're entitled to your (wrong) opinion, anon, lmao.
I hate all flamenco music.
Rap is to music what Le Petomane is to theater.
No point discussing on the quality of the farts.
Agreed. The only male rappers I even give the time of day are either clipping., now-irrelevant ones from the 90s, or little no-name internet ones.
I'm tired of hearing all these ugly, loud fuckers encouraging drug dealing, abusive
behavior, and happily insulting all girls that don't look exactly the way they want them to.
Rap needs to go down the same path as rock IMO. The edgelord scrote-made trash gets old, so it's shuffled into its own little territory (sort of like how genres like "pornogrind" aren't considered the face or pinnacle of rock or metal music as a whole) and the artists that get famous are the ones who actually start creating sincere work with meaning. I don't care if people just want something to shake their ass to in a club, I'm just sick of that sort of thing being given all the accolades, and I'm done with men getting passes to do, say and look however/whatever they want (and this is both in and out of rap).(pink-pill derailing)
>>458951>Maybe they do in fact but in my experience everytime somebody tries to bring it up online people always have to derail it with stuff like "but classic rock is misogynstic too".
I think people who say this are missing the point that rock largely cleaned up its act. It has long since been allowed to expand and prove its versatility in content, lyricism and execution. The misogynistic shit may still exist, but it's not what's centered as the face of the genre anymore. These days, when you say "rock", you can mean anything from the earliest stuff, like Sister Rosetta Tharpe, to The Beatles, to your local emo kid's favorite band (MCR), to riot grrl, to Arctic Monkeys, to someone like Mitski. It's diverse to the point where if you say "I hate rock music", people will probably look at you funny and/or think you're an autist.
On the other hand, when you say "rap", most people who haven't done a lot of digging will just think "Oh, like Chris Brown, Cardi B and Nicki Minaj? Uh…Lil Peep?". If you say "I hate rap music", people will probably assume you just hate misogynistic, superficial, and/or hypersexual lyrics, because that's basically the only content that gets praised. The true versatility and artistic potential of this genre is completely ignored in order to sell the same shitty images and stories that we've all seen. It's annoying. Logically, saying you hate rap in itself makes about as much sense as saying you don't like hearing the human voice in music at all (and there are actually people like that, though it's pretty rare) unless it's singing, but because we're shown the same annoying iterations of rap repeatedly, the entire medium of creativity is pigeonholed. 99% of its potential is not allowed to blossom, and I hate that. I was surprised to learn that even Nicki Minaj has some good music ("The Crying Game" is lovely), but with shit like this >>458831
and Anaconda making up the bulk of her most popular tracks and repertoire, I can never call myself a "fan" with a straight face. There's too much garbage mixed in, and she's constantly pandering to the lowest common denominator by stuffing her ass and portraying herself as a sentient blow-up doll whenever possible.
Also, this is an unpopular opinion, but if Chris Brown and xxxtentacion are allowed to be famous despite being objectively horrible people, Azealia Banks should be allowed too. Awful words and actions aside, she runs circles around all the popular rappers these days. At least all her music doesn't sound the same, and isn't solely about being a stripper or having huge tits/ass and getting money.
I get that Snow is a good rapper, but anytime I've tried to listen to her music it's just so fucking boring and bland. She isn't a good songwriter imo. My favorite female rappers are Jean Grae and Rapsody.
>Also, this is an unpopular opinion, but if Chris Brown and xxxtentacion are allowed to be famous despite being objectively horrible people, Azealia Banks should be allowed too. Awful words and actions aside, she runs circles around all the popular rappers these days. At least all her music doesn't sound the same, and isn't solely about being a stripper or having huge tits/ass and getting money.
I've always thought this exact same thing. Obviously Azealia is a mentally ill shit-stirrer but nothing she has done or said is objectively worse than anything popular male artists have done. Chris Brown literally tied to kill Rihanna and people still defend him to this day. When it comes to Azealia though people say she can't be the GOAT because she's an "asshole." Meanwhile, Nas was accused of abuse by his ex-wife Kelis.
Also, when I decided to accept that I just didn't like male rappers, I immediately had such a better time. Who are some of your faves, anons? I like Leikeli47, Sammus, Nitty Scott, Sampa the Great, Nadia Rose, Lady Leshurr, and Jean Grae of course. The fact that Jean Grae never got bigger really chaps my ass, it feels like there's no room for her. I always think like, could we ever have a female Frank Ocean? Who's THAT good and THAT boundary pushing AND female, without reducing her to something more consumable?
Rico nasty is also a cool, non sexualised female rapper. >>458971
Fucking hell. Azealia Banks really is a tragedy. She runs circles around other rappers females and males, lyrically. She's a great lyricist and story teller. I like how some of her songs like miss camaraderie sound like fables. Mental illness and substance addiction really is sad.>>459003
The bar is so low for male rappers, I don't even bother listening to male rappers.
Ooh wow. I'm new to rap so everything in this post is new to me I can't wait to check it out. I've been working my way through things sort of chronologically and my personal favs so far are
JJFad, but they are very hit-or-miss
Yoyo, particularly Make Way
Champ MC, particularly Ghetto Flava
Lauryn Hill, every album great
Rapsody of course, I'm addicted to the song "pay up"
I work alone long hours in a lab so I can listen to the filthiest shit I want however loud I want it's lovely. My guiltiest pleasure is Deadly Venoms but I wouldn't reccomend them. Unless you're into that. Their vulgarity is cathartic for me.
Some more female rappers that haven't been mentioned yet: Gifted Gab, Blimes, Omeretta the Great, and Rocky Badd (but she's always involved in a lot of beef.)
The Buttress is also very good, especially if you like rap that sounds wutang-esque.
File: 1567837345325.png (780.17 KB, 463x613, lmao.PNG)
Indie weeb designers make ugly as sin clothes
I don't really like the fact that children/family movies have "adult jokes" in them; not necessarily because I find it inappropriate, but because it seems people think the only way an adult could enjoy something for kids is to shove sexual jokes and stuff. Idk I find it very immature and stupid, like adults can only enjoy something is there are suggestive theme in it
On a kinda related note, adult cartoons fucking suck. They're not for adults at all, they're made with the ideas that teenagers have of adults - swearing, drugs, drinking, sex, dirty jokes. None of it is funny and interesting in the slightest. And I'm sick of fourteen year olds thinking they're some philosopher because they watched Bojack Horseman and think they know everything about life and the world. I dislike this promotion of nihilism and making everyone think it's cool and smart to be miserable, and these kinds of show just reinforce that, consciously or not
Same, i dont really get the hate. Some bits can get annoying and its not my fave podcast i go to when I need something in the background but i do keep up with it and its alright.
I like that he was the only one to speak up about pedo Michael Jacksons documentary without being a pseudo intellectual trying to grasp at straws to prove that michael wasnt guilty.
File: 1567849897330.jpg (284.4 KB, 1300x1233, destinys-child-arriving-at-the…)
I think the appeal is how relaxed they were compared to today, kids dressed like kids and not businesswomen or fashion models, teens could dress like teens, college kids could dress like college kids and so on, your facial features, makeup and hair wasn't analyzed by everyone, people actually looked human and not like dolls, you could dress fun and comfy and style yourself and your room in such a way, you didn't HAVE to dress like in expensive overdone clothing to look good and put together, it wasn't a big deal if you didn't have your ass and hips stick out 4 feet, phones were simple and you could go out and have fun without everybody snapchatting every moment
now it just feels like if you go out in something colorful or you don't have a perfect figure, you end up on some fashion don't twitter post because some asshole took a creepshot
agreed but I could add I understand if people want to be poly, I'm not one to judge until they themselves start judging others
most young western polygamous people are either weird fat fucks who go on twitter too much, insecure thots, trendy tumblr folk, or involves an obvious shitty relationship dynamic of the girl being insecure and desperate and the guy being a bitter needy insecure asshole
I like Megan but yeah I gotta agree, cause her lyrics dont make much sense to me since she brags about having a big ass and sexualizes other women and basically only praises men for having dicks and says her only type is money, effectively catering to this sex worker aesthetic lifestyle that is destroying the mentalities of people consuming this shit.
I mean, personal life and rumors aside, cause I heard Meg was bisexual and fucked women, but her lyrics dont even come across as that, its just look at me im hot, my body is sexy, i use it to get money off of men, hmm hmm reducing myself to a walking stereotype is so empowering guise.
Like what I dont get is why she cant make music focusing on a mans physical traits, or charisma, or sensuality, thats empowering no? Its fucking stupid old school songs do this more than a so called post feminist society lmao
>>459085>Im tired of seeing this cause the 2000s was mean as fuck to every woman who didn't have a perfectly skinny barbie figure, so much even Beyonce was fat-shamed by a lot of publication and people because of her so-called big thighs and not having a size 00 body. Yeah no one could take creepshots but the 2000s were mean as fuck for women
I guess, but it wasn't as rampant as it is now, the worst they did back then was leave an unflattering magazine article, nowadays if your body isn't perfect nobody can shut up about it, you get meme'd over twitter, anytime your name pops up anywhere half the comments will be about your body, they didn't over-analyze things like ratios, shoulders, chest width, etc. you can still be considered attractive and feminine even if your nose isn't small and button-like or your lips are pumped to your nose
I'm not saying shaming never happened but it's definitely not as insane, obsessive or strict as what people nowadays are doing
File: 1567866211955.jpeg (34.28 KB, 450x299, 56BA972D-1984-4D8B-AC04-3E2182…)
Sushi isn’t that great.
File: 1567866358193.jpeg (498.17 KB, 1936x968, 85A44735-87BF-4A3B-B079-9BCFC2…)
Unless you consumed a lot of age inappropriate celebrity content, you probably were too young to absorb those messages.
I was subscribed to CosmoGirl in the early 2000s, this magazine was targeted at young girls and was filled with diet and exercise advice, which would never happen in a magazine now. Celebrity gossip rags like Star would shame any celeb woman who dare left the house not perfectly made up and publish the photos for everyon to see. Britney Spears was mercilessly mocked by the whole world for putting on a few and performing the 2007 VMAs and not being perfectly thin.
File: 1567866586485.jpeg (52.44 KB, 300x300, 05B6707D-E6D4-44F9-9A97-E28D85…)
Quotes from an archived Today.com article called “Was Media unfair to called Britney Spears Fat?” dated September 10th, 2007
>But what about the nastiest comments of all — those about her body? “Lard and Clear,” read Monday’s headline in the New York Post.
>“The bulging belly she was flaunting was SO not hot,” wrote E! Online. And so on.
>More profoundly, in an age where skinny models and skeletal actresses are under scrutiny for the message they’re sending young girls, what does it say that we’re excoriating a young woman for a little thickness in her middle?
Keep in mind, Britney only looked like this. Things aren’t perfect now, but Lizzo was able to perform on that same VMA stage a couple weeks ago. A fat woman would’ve never even been invited to the VMAs back then.
I grew up in he 90's with no internet and only magazines and kids/teen TV to influence us, the 90's mags were cruel when it comes to how they wanted young girls to look. Nowadays they might favor a small waist but bigger bum/hips/thighs but in the 90s the pressure was on to be skinny from head to toe
At least now naturally hourglass or slightly pear shaped women are seen as having a womanly figure, 'tiny all over' was the only acceptable option back then
This era was so fucking stupid, I swear. Thats why I cant stand any praise for it when they basically shamed women for looking like women. God forbid you have sexually dimorphic features unless youre a porn star, oooh no.
Shit like this makes me honestly annoyed as fuck.
File: 1567871907368.jpg (153.04 KB, 925x1280, b13d472a2b75f9e7dfd98fb1f75881…)
Yeah, I'm really gonna need people to pull back "girls could dress like girls and things were better!!!" style talk. Jesus, even a little further back, the mocking of Monica Lewinsky as "fat" was EVERYWHERE, and like, sure, you can cherry pick one picture of Ashley Tisdale looking like a young girl, but there were fucking "countdown to the Olsen Twins' 18th bday" on the radio, all the Friends girls were RAIL thin, and even Christina Aguilera's first big single was about "you gotta rub me the right way~." The makeup was subtler, but it was still there, and the emphasis on these insane impossible perfectly flat stomachs was omnipresent.
I don't think there was a "better" time. It's all just worse in different ways. You go back to the 80s, it was hyper toned, giant titted, enormous hair Barbie types. The forties and fifties, women were wearing girdles and tons of makeup and heels. You go further and you got corsets. There were maybe eras where we were more forgiving of certain flaws, but there was no time when things were really, actually better.
File: 1567872052818.jpg (15.17 KB, 166x258, Backlash,_first_edition.jpg)
This might be interesting to you, anon. Written in 91 so it's not exactly the era you're talking about, but you're onto something. I'm reading a book right now called 90's Bitch that's similar, and I'm really digging it so far.
My memories of the 90s are teens writing into agony aunt pages about wanting boob jobs and it being the time when fully shaved pussy really became an expectation
The fashion was trashy, I'll always remember a store near me selling 'bald pussy' T-shirts that had a print of one of those hairless cats on it.. it was a store for 13-17 year olds, not even adult sizes. My mother was horrified when we spotted it and I pretended I didn't know what it meant
File: 1567872680357.png (278.33 KB, 653x410, Queen_of_Mean.png)
It's nice to see that disney kids can now have body types that aren't rail thin
Yup thats about that time when pedophilia became en vogue.. seriously fuck this decade everything suffered from it, obesity rates, fashion, music, entertainment, just fuck it.>>459192
Thanks anon, I will check it out!
I agree with the first part because almost all male pedophiles penetrate their victims
and that is very physically damaging and emotionally traumatizing for the child. Female pedophiles still cause emotional damage even if there usually isn't any physical harm or penetration, still doesn't mean they should be in relationships with little kids.>>459225
Anon, staring yourself is very damaging. Your body is literally cannibalizing itself and leads to organ malfunction and failure. In severe cases you can't recover fully from it. In comparison breast/butt implants, liposuction, fat transfers aren't nearly as bad. Ofc they are not natural but none of those cause damage to your major organs like heart, kidneys, liver, as well as your hormones and reproductive system. Starvation destroys your whole body, not to mention how it worsens your mental health as well, when your whole body is practically shutting down.
recover from anorexia
I've always heard that anorexia is like alcoholism, that it never fully leaves you and you can relapse at any moment or under enough stress
The whole big ass trend is weird to witness as a 30 something year old. A big bum was the one worst thing that you could have when I was growing up. Funny how quickly trends change
I personally prefer this era because there's more variety. The Kardashian look may be in vogue, but before then, it was either the Paris Hilton/"porn star with huge tits but everything else skinny" look, or the heroin chic look, anyway. Plastic surgery addiction is definitely not being newly introduced to the "trend" lexicon.
Besides, it's not hard to find alternatives at all. The internet has made it all so easy. There are so many aesthetics to mix and match, all sorts of individuals doing their own thing that you can look up to, and so many different communities to join so you can find "your type" of people in. Things have really changed for the better. I think this is the only era where Lizzo, Adele, Normani, Grimes and Ariana Grande could've all been successful at the exact same time. Fat is okay, skinny is okay, muscular is okay, and almost everything in between is acceptable as well. Compare that to the insane standards and nitpicking of >>459126
The only downside is that even non-celebrities, when creating an internet persona, are expected to be polished and retouched to perfection, to the point where it defies reality.
File: 1567877591436.jpg (103.52 KB, 675x1200, DqcycI5W4AEQy37.jpg)
niche rant incoming, but my unpopular opinion is that i think the white pube (uk "art critic" duo) are a pair of posh, hypocritical, fake-woke, spoiled children.
i tried to get on board with them bc they seem to be in high demand at the moment and i thought i was missing something. turns out i wasn't. anything they don't understand (art history, for instance lmao) they declare irrelevant and try to say things like love island and the legend of zelda are more culturally enriching. to me it just screams wilful ignorance of all the really hard work contemporary art historians are putting into decolonising art history.
they went to the rca and have an inflated sense of importance/ego as a result. they act as though they are above reproach and criticism themselves because of their "positionality" (both liverpudlian, i think, which they seem to think makes them some kind of oppressed because they're not londoners? one's british asian and one's just a regular ol' white uggo who claims she's working class). this is something that especially pisses me off actually bc they're from such privilege (i hate this game of oppression top trumps but they're such big players of it that i feel i have to mention it) - the bame one's dad is a fucking investment banker and the other one owns a gallery in her mid-twenties (don't care how you rationalise it, that reeks of family money). and again, both studied at the rca which is off-limits to anyone from an actually poor background bc of the living costs in london and the expectation that your family will contribute towards your education. like any posh fake-woke kids, they seem to obfuscate this because it compromises their image. all of this has afforded them this sense of superiority where they feel justified in attacking ppl and responding to honest criticism with nastiness, blitheness, and siccing their followers on the commentor.
for instance if either of them saw this, i can guarantee it would screenshot and put on their insta with some shitty comment, and their hoardes of lazy, ignorant student stans/early career art kids would be like omg girls no u r the best, everyone donate to twp's patreon 4 emotional damages and their intellectual labour!
that's another thing, it always seems like these characters are constantly lauded for their Very Important Work - it's some kind of catchphrase in sjw circles.
they're also so incapable of discussing their thoughts and takes and ideas that they frequently close their comments sections, which actually seems like shitty praxis for what they're purporting to be all about.
the thing that really soured them for me though was their attack on nina edge (picrel), a bame artist who does work for housing in liverpool, who tweeted through a community account that she was legitimately concerned about the safety of women with the introduction of self-id laws. that was it. they witch-hunted her on social media and sought to get her fired from her position at ljmu. completely disregarding the fact that edge has been operating on the "right side of history" since before they were even born - in active, beneficial roles in bame, lower-income, and rural communities. what the fuck are they doing for others? all i see them doing is travelling, playing the fucking nintendo switch at "work", bullying or shitting on people, and refusing to learn anything that is remotely challenging or grow as people???? so intensely self-righteous and ignorant.
and they're somehow above reproach. perhaps because weak art students love their idea that you don't have to care about learning anything important or difficult, because you can just use identity politics and """intuition""" and an overgrown ego born from personal privilege to just thug your way through stuff.
This isn’t really unpopular though. While most people hate Kenna herself, they still like her aesthetic.
I personally don’t like her aesthetic because it’s just plain boring.
I'm not a big fan personally, I find the all brown autumn theme a bit lame. The pink/pastel colour scheme was nice for a while but she stopped that already.
Anyway, ever since reading the spergy jealous nitpicking about her on PULL she seems infinitely less tragic compared to how pathetic some weebs can be. Her existence just reminds me of them instead of the dumb shit she's said/done herself.
I can vibe with a bit of Steven Universe. I enjoy watching cartoons made by people who grew up watching
the same cartoons I watched growing up. I would never admit this in my normal life lmao
Idk. I’ve watched it and I don’t call myself a fan, I don’t like it but I don’t hate watch it either. To me it’s just a show I picked up and binged a season because it was colorful, it was there and I stuck around to see how it ends. Maybe with a little Stockholm syndrome and thinking, until
it ends, there’s a chance it’ll stop being boring and wishy-washy. Well I stuck around and it doesn’t get any better.
There’s a lot of weird "ironic" humor in modern cartoons (and SU) that I don’t like because a bunch of bland cal-arts adults digging elbows at each other doesn’t make up for the lack of soul in a good cartoon and being ‘self-aware’ doesn’t mean the execution wasn’t flawed or that your concept was shit in the first place. To be honest, if you’re an adult and you’re not minding anyone’s kids I think there’s no point in watching children’s cartoons when there is a whole world of other media out there to engage with that isn’t restricted by who it’s aimed at. To actually answer your question I think SU’s ‘popularity’ is down to its LGBT clout while it’s trendy and turbo nerds can salivate over the anime references. If this aired a decade ago I doubt there would be any lefty Tumblr people for it to appeal to. Tbh all the fans of this cartoon I’ve seen are twenty somethings with zero culture and heavily involved in fandoms.
I remember this pathetic libfem going around on this website whining about the ebil radfems on pinkpill and gender critical, saying that this site had a "female pedophile" problem saying that the women on this website were encouraging female pedophilia and that it's not as bad as male pedophilia. a bunch of anons pointed out that this was bullshit. this is probably her just being a salty cunt trying to make us look bad. or it's a scrot doing the same thing.>>459224
what the fuck does "pedophiliac" features mean? do you mean retaining child like features?
I don't care how good it is, no superhero/capeshit movie deserves any movie award.>>459219
I really hope you're joking
I mean penetrating someone against their will or when they are underdeveloped is worse than other types of molestation cos pain and injury are an added reality but it's still fucked up
Boys who are sexually abused can grow up to become pedos themselves so it creates a cycle of more kids being abused..
>>459565>I don't care how good it is, no superhero/capeshit movie deserves any movie award.
The promotion budget for Joker alone is probably a lot more than the production budget for all the rest of the movies on Venice.
Its very skewed. Like how they keep giving Pixar the same Oscar award for animation every year. The other movies that compete all have like a tenth of the budget and are these passion projects that take forever to complete but its always some Pixar 200 millon dollar movie that gets it at the end, for everyone else being a nominee is a good enough award.
How is she a fujo if she's saying 'let young boys be in relatonships with older women'?
A fujo is a girl who likes BL (pedophilic or not) not straight pedophilia.
The horror movie music in the audio of the video gets me every time.
I hate Brittany Venti but I was actually really worried about her when her boyfriend started breaking plates in front of her and screaming at her, dude's not right in the head.
Anon, I'm the same and worry my bf isn't. It's soul-crushing at times, honestly. The only thing that makes me feel better is knowing he chose me and that maybe he's memed himself into believing some of this, and would be more like me if he were able to chill. Like that he'd just be able to think "that person's cute/hot" but go on with his day, even if it was a friend. Sometimes it seems like he's borderline me-sexual or is at least really attracted to me so maybe it's possible. Sometimes it does sound like it's more like me, but others it sounds like the opposite…
I look at people and think they're attractive and may stare or get butterflies, but it's never enough for me to want to actually fuck them. I don't even think about fucking them. Is that actually normal? I thought people just thought other people were hot and maybe got a little aroused at most looking them over? Usually it's more objective than emotional for me and I don't think about it very much, definitely not enough for it to show up in my fantasies or make me want to be poly.>>459711>ie repeatedly fantasizing about it (cheating lite) and or downright pursuing it
Thank god, other people feel upset by this too? I hate knowing my bf would watch porn and look at other girls nudes. He even said that doing the repeated fantasizing doesn't actually make specific fantasies go away, which is what some people claim. I feel like people think I'm crazy for it bothering me. I really don't even let serious fantasies or recurring ones about other people into my head and ones about friends are a total no-no to me. I don't care enough to bother with any of them and I feel like once I'm down that road, I can't turn back, so I've never entertained them because I have a ton of sexual self-control. Bf thought maybe I'm "repressed" but I honest to god don't give enough of a shit and they barely cross my mind, I don't feel like I'm really forcing myself.
I can't control other people and should not, but I have feelings, you know? Sometimes I cry because I wish I was "normal" with my attraction so I wouldn't feel like some sort of Christian role model that doesn't exist and wouldn't feel like a dumbshit for being actually person-sexual.
File: 1567986564330.jpg (44.38 KB, 618x461, n64rainbowroad.jpg_618x0_.jpg)
Mario Kart 64's Rainbow Road is overrated and boring.
Wanting to fuck someone can be fleeting, and it is fleeting most of the time
. Everyone is different, I think it's unfair to crucify someone for a thought crime that is literally just lizard-brain driven and is momentary. Again, being attracted to someone is a random thing and not something one decides to do. Also attraction is
wanting to fuck someone, unless youre asexual.
Like, if your bf is a retard cumbrain that is obsessing over other women in front of you and jacks off to porn non stop that's obv a problem but you'd be silly to think normal people don't see a random person on the street they think is legitimately fuckable. One can think that for a minute, then move on. It's like thinking about a french fry or something but you don't actually care enough about a french fry to ruin your good diet.
Anyway, my unpopular opinion (in NorCal) is that Burning Man is a retarded drug fest that people exaggerate the vibes of because they're all high as fuck and think they're having spiritual moments. I fucking hate these wannabe boomers.
>>459881>Also attraction is wanting to fuck someone, unless youre asexual.
no, it definitely is not. you can be attracted to someone but not be sexually attracted to them, or you can be slightly sexually attracted to them, maybe wanting to kiss them at most. there are different ways to be attracted to someone, and feeling "attraction" doesn't mean you want to fuck them.
>but you'd be silly to think normal people don't see a random person on the street they think is legitimately fuckable.
that's weird. i don't think of some random "attractive" guy and imagine fucking him. like literally a thought can go to "that person is cute" and no further. just because someone is attractive doesn't mean you want to fuck them. i think zayn malik is a good looking guy but i have 0 interest in fucking him. you can be attracted based on multiple things, too, and it still not result in a sexual attraction. it's pretty fucking weird that so many of you immediately jump to imagining fucking complete randos
>>459887>I don't actually "jump to imagining fucking complete randos" 24/7, it has happened maybe like 2 times a year at best, and has been fleeting.
tbh i feel like you're a bit offended bc you know it to be true and it's more than twice a year, and more often when you're in close encounters with people like coworkers and such.
>I will say though, just bc your attraction mounts slowly and you'd want to kiss someone on sight rather than wanna think about fucking them
i literally don't even think about kissing them. that's weird.
>There are people who definitely obsess over randos but they're not very common and they're not all your dumbfuck cumbrain boyfriends.
almost all men do this, lbr, but i see it a lot from women too. it's a pointless relationship. you have a glorified friendship peppered with sex between each other, though ultimately apparently you desire more than each other. i just dont understand why people like this are even in monogamous relationships. i'm just saying, it doesn't make much sense. more people should just have socially monogamous relationships and not sexual then instead of trying to veil their degeneracy just to end up with failed marriages and broken families
>>459891>First of all can you stop deleting and reposting the post over and over? I can see you doing it lol.
i made a small correction. that's what you're supposed to do, delete and repost your correction, anon.
>People sometimes think about smacking a friend they love bc the friend is being annoying, people sometimes get the impulse to eat something they shouldn't, one sometimes has the weird urge to jump off when they're near a cliff. These are impulses that people have to varying degrees and sexual attraction is among them.
i think wanting to smack your friend is very different from wanting to have sex with randos or whatever. someone that automatically jumps to the thought of fucking strangers is already someone that is not very discerning, most likely generally, and it's likely they'd act on that if there were no consequences. you can cry "thought crimes" as if not acting on it is all that matters, but i still don't wanna be with a dude that has "fleeting thoughts" about wanting to poop on my chest, even if he never acts on it. it's just the principle. as i said, i just don't see the reason why people who are prone to this type of thing even try to fit into sexual monogamy when it clearly doesn't suit them. i think there are people who sexual monogamy AND social works perfectly for, and this narrative about wanting to have sex with others but denying yourself it makes you a "good spouse" being normalized is just way weird. sexual and social monogamy obviously isn't for them.
I feel similar confusion. I never imagine fucking/sexually assaulting strangers without consent, (which a stranger obviously cannot give) but apparently this is normal.
Are people's relationships just them getting turned on by, and imagining fucking other people until they die?
>>459897>Are people's relationships just them getting turned on by, and imagining fucking other people until they die?
seriously, yes, and then everyone patting themselves on the back for not fucking all the other people they imagine fucking. it's so bizarre to me that people are seeing strangers irl and start to imagine what it'd be like to get fucked by the barista. like, i just don't understand why these people get married? like, fine if you think that way, i don't think this is necessarily inherent to all humans and i think it's really weird that they insist on entering arrangements they are unhappy with, clearly. i see the same insane cognitive dissonance play out over and over again. "well, i'm fine with him wanting to fuck x minor celebrity but if he were to get to know her in person, THEN i'd be jealous". like, he already would fuck her and wants to fuck her? why is that already not offensive? all of these marriages are literally based around "only as good as my options and what my circumstance reasonably allows". they're pointless.
>>459891>people sometimes think about smacking a friend they love
what?? what the fuck?
i think you're projecting here i have never, ever thought about assaulting my friends holy shit
She was obviously joking there, I lol'd. And you're
crazy if you think guys don't think up any manner of absurd things they'd like to do to you while you're naked.
Case in point: the entire porn and fetish industry
I agree with you both. If I'm in a relationship my desire for other people shuts off completely. I might be able to find someone objectively attractive, but without lust and desire, if that makes sense. Like how you can look at a female model and assess that they are indeed attractive, but get nothing from it.
I even stopped looking at porn (I was pretty addicted before) because I think it's disrespectful to look at anyone else period, and I expect my partner to do the same. I am pretty lucky because my boyfriend is similar, he is very devoted and only thinks of me. I'll probably get jumped on a lot as naive for believing that but his actions and demeanor have proved it to me.>>459734
Nah, I think it's normal for it to bother you. But a lot of people settle for the reality that most partners allow their eyes to wander and don't have a very strong sense of loyalty. It's always played up as something out of their control and sure, maybe the initial thought comes out of nowhere, but once you entertain it and give it attention that's 100% on them. For example if you're fantasizing about someone you are going out of your way to do that and get off on it, it's not innocent behavior. Imagine if someone fantasized about killing someone in their mind. Suddenly it matters even though it's not real, and they didn't actually do it, huh? Imagining cheating on your partner is just as bad as doing it, at least to me.
I twigged on when I started getting weird messages on tumblr and realised I'd been reblogged onto some hair fetish blogs. I was just lazy with my look, why did that have to be fetishised?
It's a pain to know that since the tumblr purge only targeted conventional porn it's all still out there.
File: 1568108339952.png (1.78 MB, 1198x1192, knj.png)
I think "e-girls" are actually rather cute.
File: 1568109243967.gif (809.82 KB, 498x356, 1562718650197.gif)
Full bush is disgusting. I grew my pubes out due to having a hectic couple months and not having a convienient time to shave, it's been horrible. The scent of all my vaginal fluid and urine gets trapped in them and I can smell it through yoga pants just halfway through the day. I have to thoroughly shampoo them for at least 5 minutes in the shower to get the scent out, but it just gets gross smelling again within a couple hours. I don't understand how anyone prefers having their vag in this awful state.
This happens on my armpits. All my body hair is grown out then I shave and repeat.
When that armpit hair gets to be near a quarter inch, it smells faster even with normal deodorant use.
This happens on my armpits. All my body hair is grown out then I shave and repeat.
When that armpit hair gets to be near a quarter inch, it smells faster even with normal deodorant use.
People have different vag lips/discharge/scent/hair amount. Some women could avoid washing with a full bush for a week without there being an obvious vaginal smell (though I'm sure the rest of the body would smell) and some women can be completely shaven and wash twice a day and have a really strong vaginal smell.
Plus yoga pants aren't the most breathable item of clothing for your vagina.
Having a full bush might not suit you but smelling bad a couple hours after showering isn't exactly the norm. When you say you shampoo your bush are you using specific products for that area cos you could actually be upsetting the natural balance down there and causing a smell that way
I'd see a doc about possible yeast problems if I smelled bad that quickly after washing, pubic hair alone does not cause that
I like having pubes, maybe change your diet/wear looser clothes/ stop using much product? I never really had this problem despite having a full bush
if the urine thing bothers you what I usually do is shave my inner thighs and almost to wear my pubic area is, then I shave my butt and labia area but keep a triangle
I'm the same when it comes to my vag. I'm an extremely hairy woman so my pubes grow really long and thick and I'm also somewhat hormonal so my sweat tends to smell. I didn't shave for one month and I do use products designed for cleaning my private area that are PH balanced and only wear cotton panties that are washed separately from the other clothing at a higher temperature and wear overall breathable clothing. I just couldn't do it because it was extremely uncomfortable for me. The smell down there wasn't that bad but it was definitely worse than when I don't have hair down there and the worst part was the itchiness, my pubes made me really fucking itchy even if I trimmed them.
Now I only shave my vag and my armpits because having hair there makes my life harder but I don't shave any other parts of my body because it's unnecessary.
People are smalltime hoarders. Insta and youtube are full of different collector communities where people are spending small fortunes on collections where I don't know if there's enough joy coming from it or whether it reaches a point of just obsession to complete sets
I don't do make up but I own a few toys and browse those tags on Insta, people get such a buzz from buying that moderation goes out the window
File: 1568228886307.png (274.37 KB, 680x371, EEH1qicUcAYZD0V.png)
The new iphone is ugly. Makes me sad because iphones used to be the prettiest phone, but now this bitch ugly and expensive.
File: 1568228999388.jpg (607.45 KB, 1080x3240, ZomboDroid 11092019120859.jpg)
I get the concept, I do. I've had the idea to combine hardware with jewelry myself. But some of these designs are retarded and awkward.
the things that happen to all sorts of different animals in laboratories is horrific. blindness is the least of it (they actually use rabbits to test products in their eyes as rabbit's have no tear ducts and can't 'expel' the product). in some places where they test on monkeys they will operate on the monkeys to remove their vocals chords before they start the testing so they can't make noise as they try to scream.
seriously, please choose cruelty free products where possible. there are a barbaric things going on in these labs simply for product testing on items like makeup. even if you live in places like the eu where testings is banned, you could still be giving your money to companies who test in china.
sorry for the longwinded reply, this is just something that hurts my soul. those poor bbs
>>460275>they fix the whole shape of your hair based on your curl pattern and show you how to style it to bring out the texture
That's exactly what I want too. But so far I've never really found any hairdresser who was able to do that. Typically for the few times I asked to get my hair cut I'd say I never straighten my hair because mine is fragile and I have dermatitis on my scalp. So I want to cut my hair to whatever length, and once it's over the hairdresser will almost always cut it way shorter than asked because they always miscalculate the different lengths between straight wet hair and my naturally curly hair. And then they almost always say "now all you have to do is to straighten your hair!" despite everything I tell them at the beginning.
I've seen a few videos about girls with 2c and 3a curls getting new haircuts recently, I'll definitely use them as references to ask what I want precisely next time.
>>461071>doesn't apply to gay couples who aren't allowed to legally get married where they live
So definitions apply except to where you think they don't? Who are you to assume someone doesn't have a good reason to not marry on paper.
Marriage can be a shit deal for a lot of people, it doesn't mean they love their spouses less.
i side-eye dog people so hard because they, at heart, believe they are owed attention or affection from animals, even if they don't literally say it. that's what they think. i think they should be avoided completely. they place dog-human relationships on a pedestal and this really says a lot about them, if you think about it.
this is not a criticism of dogs. dog people who are "meh" to cats or most other animals that have a healthy and necessary sense of self preservation or caution are unwitting attention whores or narcs that think they deserve an animal's affection or attention. if you ever listen to them talk, they always say how "loving" human-dog friendships are like, transcendental in their pureness, you realize that they actually prefer relationships that are centered around another person or being living for them, to value only them, at their own potential detriment. they'll never say this outright, though, obviously, because no one wants to be thought of as an attention whore or narc, but they'll get overly offended the minute you suggest that this speaks volumes about them. it's something you have to listen for.
Agreed. I work at a vet and I see this shit constantly. People really do think all dogs owe them affection, and when they approach a strangers dog I the waiting room who is sick or totally disinterested in them they get super offended and say shit like "what's wrong with your dog? MY dog LOVES people!!" Note that these types of people's complaints about other pets is ALWAYS "they don't even love u lol." Like they need a random animal validating their feelings every second of every day or it's worthless.
Also crazy cat ladies get a lot of flak but crazy dog people are 100 times worse. They are a literal nightmare to work with and my job has made me despise them. (Responsible sane owners are fine, of course.)
>>461077>So definitions apply except to where you think they don't?
I never said it changes the fact they're by definition not married. I said that my rant doesn't apply because it doesn't bother me when people in that circumstance say they're married, since it's not their fault they can't do it legally due to discrimination.
>Who are you to assume someone doesn't have a good reason to not marry on paper. Marriage can be a shit deal for a lot of people, it doesn't mean they love their spouses less.
lolwut. Where do I say couples love each other less if they're not married? You're projecting. If you don't want to get married, that's fine, but marraige is a legal commitment and if you're not willing to make it, then why say you are married? It's stupid. It is factually inaccurate and something you're CHOOSING not to do. The word "partner" exists to describe people in serious relationships that aren't married, why not call your SO the thing that's actually true? Save the legal label for people who actually make the legal commitment. This logic shouldn't be hard to understand.
exactly, and i agree about "crazy dog people", a lot of people will concede that they're insane narcs, but what i'm getting at is that this is actually almost all dog owners/dog preferrers, save for maybe those that found a dog they rescued or just don't want to see them abused. 99.99999999999% of dog owners or those that "like dogs better" idealize the traits in dogs that end up getting them abused. they're narcs or attention whores. i'll take in stray dogs i've come across because obviously they need to be saved, but i think they are psychologically unhealthy animals in comparison to most others and it wouldn't ever occur to me to think that dog-human relationship dynamics are at all "ideal" or "pure" or that dogs are special and "better" than other animals for being battered wives.
people that "prefer dogs" better - not just crazy dog people - are people that idealize animals or people with a battered wife mentality, so long as they're the object of affection for that person or animal. they think "well, i'm not betraying this animal's trust or obsession by abusing them physically or verbally, so this level of worship is deserved and pure and righteous", and that's very wrong. if you're anything but horrified by the way dogs see and treat people, you don't love dogs, you're just a narc, imo
What the fuck? Dogs are my favorite animal so I’m an abusive
narc now? You sound crazy. I don’t even own pets and I don’t hate cats or other animals, I just think dogs are cuter.
>>461108>Dogs are my favorite animal so I’m an abusive narc now? You sound crazy. I don’t even own pets and I don’t hate cats or other animals, I just think dogs are cuter
overly offended, very typical. it's kind of dumb to have a favorite animal just because they're "cuter". you can just say "i think dogs are cuter", you have no real basis for them to be your favorite then, which is almost as lame as dog people that love animals for having unhealthy mentalities. i think weasels are probably the cutest animals but they aren't my favorite animals. anyways, reach harder in trying to get offended by 1 person's opinion, but approach most people who prefer dogs and they'll say "they're special, they're better because -insert people worship, obsession, no sense of self preservation, essentially-". most don't say they prefer them over other animals for their appearance
How? A lot of people in that thread admit they've been bitten by dogs or dislike dog owners for not training their dogs and they just don't want to be around them. Why do dogfags have such a problem with valid
criticisms, accountability and reality?
NTA. Maybe I am a shit owner because none of my dogs have ever acted like battered wives and in my eyes they are independent creatures who at any moment think God knows what. They are like toddlers in the sense that they will do whatever the fuck they want and it's your job to keep them safe.
I love dogs cause we can sort of communicate with them, but they are also mysterious creatures who look at a world in a different way than us humans do.
>literally every article online (and feel free to find more) centers around how all of the traits that are unhealthy and dangerous for dogs, are their most valuable qualities
if you can't see that that's not right, you don't love dogs, just admit it.
why are you people so offended to be viewed with skepticism by anyone? why do you think you're owed that people should trust your motivations or your character, when they don't even know you? the onus is on the person to prove that they are decent, to animals, to children, to people, etc. it is not healthy for everyone to assume everyone is necessarily good, but dog people get offended when they aren't granted immediately "good person" status. i know you guys really want to reach hard to be offended by an admittedly unpopular opinion, be honest with yourselves and others and stop lying about why most people prefer dogs. if you yourself want to try to claim you're "not like other dog owners", fine, but admit that how most people view dogs agrees with my opinion: they are unconditionally loving to their own detriment, will sacrifice their safety in exchange for being treated with even less than basic dignity, etc. you can claim you don't see dogs this way, but most "dog lovers" admit they see them this way, they just frame it positively.>>461119>many
out of 1094 posts, literally there are like, 3 that say anything similar, and i don't think those are acceptable. if you refuse to admit that people typically say godawful things with much, much higher frequency about other animals or consider animals that don't act like dogs to be deserving of death or harm, you're lying. maybe sort out how dog people speak about other animals before you try coming for people that have come across countless dog owners and side-eye them for good reason. >>461128
this is about people that prefer dogs, not even dog owners or dogs. dogs are fine and should be respected.
You do realize the human-dog relationship is glamorized by media to be wonderful and amazing and has been shoved down everyone's throats since childhood? Just because people like dogs and think a human dog relationship is a fun happy thing doesn't make them abusive
Samefag, but I hope you're just as critical of cat owners who talk about how their cats are just as loving and affectionate as dogs are.
You'd get your point across much better if you simply stated why human-dog relationship are unhealthy for dogs (and you had me when you were explaining why) and ways to mitigate that, rather than saying shit like everyone who calls dogs their favorite is a narc
File: 1568250293505.jpg (72.86 KB, 640x459, catss.jpg)
cats rule, dogs drool
>>461133>Just because people like dogs and think a human dog relationship is a fun happy thing doesn't make them abusive.
i never called them abusive
. i said they're almost always attention whores or narcs
. keywords: "almost always", "attention whores", "or narcs". it's actually you guys that claimed i called them abusive
, because surprise, surprise, "dog people" are dramatic and overly offended (as i said) when anyone, people or animals, is suspicious of them. you are not owed immediate trust by animals or people. it's not a crime for people or animals to be suspicious of you. people with healthy boundaries don't get overly offended when people or animals are suspicious or cautious of others.>>461137>and ways to mitigate that
the purpose of my op and subsequent posts weren't to get into ways of mitigating that, that's really for another thread. this was my unpopular opinion, which is that certain 'small things', specifically that dog preferrers prefer them because they're often obsessed in a way that no other animal generally is, something that seems innocuous to most, really isn't. every post in response is a refusal by dog fans to admit that what i mentioned really is the case for most dog fans, or even a sizeable chunk of them, and own their shit as a community, and admit it's really weird and wrong. i'd have more respect for them if they did.
i s2g this is troonery or tra levels of entitlement
>immediately very upset when anyone suspects them of anything>refusal to condemn toxicity in a community and quash that toxicity for the sake of animals, all because they're personally offended by the implication that they could be thought of negatively>projection about other animal lovers and denial about how abusive and cruel dog fans are to other animals and general dog fan rhetoric toward other animals specifically because other animals aren't fanatically obsessed with their owners/parents
>>461138>tax burden isn't increased because the federal government won't assume I have more access to money just because I have a significant other
You get tax benefits from being married and filing jointly, though, especially if one spouse makes substantially less money than the other. But if you both make good money then yeah, you will get taxed more, naturally.
>won't have to worry about my partner fucking up my credit or saddling me with mutual debt, our affairs are our own unless we share it
Spouses aren't typically responsible for the debt of the other unless they co-signed for it. Also, don't marry a deadbeat. If you don't realize your partner is garbage with money before marriage then you fucked up. (See every stupid r/relationships post where people are like "just found out my fiancee has 100k in debt, our wedding is in 4 hours, am i overreacting?")
>if we ever decide we don't want to continue the relationship divorce is really expensive
If you're already planning ahead for divorce, why even pretend to be married in the first place? Again, the disdain isn't aimed towards couples who decide to avoid marriage, but people who pretend they are married anyway. Gets real awkward when you're "divorcing" your "husband" every few years. Just call them a partner or boyfriend and go.
I think it's fine to cautionary assume most men are financially deadbeat, and have a healthy fear of divorce since it's so common.
I'm fine with vow ceremonies, and rings, I just don't understand why someone would let a piece of paper dictate what they decide to call their spouse. If your guy performs like a husband, then he's a husband as far as anyone else is concerned.
Common law marriage is still subject to the same norms as legal marriage to be recognized - such as filing joint tax returns and joint accounts/credit cards, and you still have to have your relationship legally dissolved if you break up. So other than saving money on a ceremony or marriage license, you're still going to wind up being responsible for everything you would be in a legal marriage. A deadbeat common law partner can still fuck you over and you could still even wind up owing spousal support in the event of a breakup. Avoiding a "real" marriage just to wind up in a common law marriage doesn't get you any of the technically single benefits. That said, in the US, common law marriage is recognized by less than 10 states so it's not a factor for most people anyway.
It's not about the ceremony or a piece of paper, it's about intention. LARPing as a married couple when you have no intention to be married or even stay with them is just couples pretending they have it together and getting "maturity points" like another anon said. If you've been living with your partner for a decade and have kids and bought a house together, whatever, sure. If you've been dating for like 2 years and don't even live together and still call him hubby, you're retarded.
File: 1568264024979.jpg (23.43 KB, 500x375, kitty and shiba.jpg)
I like cats and dogs (just not those yippy annoying small ones and pitbull type dogs) but I hate dog owners who think cats should be outlawed or that cats are satan, it's a fucking cat Jim, what the fuck did it do to you? I guess maybe a part of it is bitterness now due to cats being the second most popular pet after goldfish.
I love both, am a dog owner. The only problem I really ever have with cat owners is when they have one that kills a ton of small animals and then don't take action to try to stop them. I know it's their instinct, but having to watch birds dying or having them leave dead birds places over and over is too much, especially when cats can actually pose a threat to songbirds and wildlife in an area if they're not controlled. I understand a lot better why some people go as far as saying they should be kept indoors since seeing this. Where I live there's also a serious risk of local wildlife killing your cat instead of the other way around, so people might be more proactive about outdoor time safety.
I still love seeing the neighborhood cats outside regardless since I don't have one. I don't get why you have to just like one or the other.
Except for gay people, said anon.
Either there's exceptions to definitions or there's not.
Anon implied that if gay people can't get the piece of paper then their union is implied through their romantic partnership and commitment.
There's no romantic difference between a couple that's been together for a long time, or had a ceremony without signing the piece of paper.
Besides, original anon reneged and said she was referring to annoying couples that call each other hubby/wifey, the same lot of immature people throwing 'monthaversaries' for themselves to celebrate a relationship that hasn't even made it a year.
>>461329>Either there's exceptions to definitions or there's not.
Anon implied that if gay people can't get the piece of paper then their union is implied through their romantic partnership and commitment.
But that's completely different because in that instance you have a couple who is committed enough to get married, but not legally allowed. As opposed to a couple that can get married but won't. It's unfair to gay people who live in countries with marraige inequality to equalize the two circumstances.
>>461422>And as mentioned earlier, it's not like people never have personal interests to not get married on paper.
As previoisly stated, if people don't want to get married that's perfectly fine, but they're still not married and it's a choice they're making. You might see acknowledging reality as "dickish" for some reason, but that doesn't make it any less real.
Why are you so defensive about people finding it annoying when people refusing to get married say they are? Especially when you just see it as ~a piece of paper~? If that's all it is, then why is the legal label so important? It makes no sense.
I nearly went ftm a few years ago and tbh I was full of trauma and trying to get away from sexism. That mixed with a repressed attraction to women. I've heard other detrans women describe the same reasons but then I see some that go on to transition will end up joining in with mens culture of misogyny and it's gross when you see it. It'll be interesting in the next few years to see if detransition figures ever become a real thing on paper cos I can sense an increase coming
I fully noped out of continuing hormones when for the second time I was in the middle of two men talking about how 12 year old girls should be legal.. put me back with the women please
>>461442>and it's a choice they're making
There's tons of factors that could be heavily influencing them to not make that choice. It's valid
Why don't gay people just uproot their lives and move to countries where gay marriage is legal and why do they choose to continue to live in oppressive countries? There, see, everything can be boiled down to making a "choice" when you decide you know every single factor at play and assume people are not going far enough to commit out of sheer stubbornness.
I fail to see how anyone calling a partner their husband or wife without the paper would get you bothered. Unless they're an obnoxious couple airing it in the first place you sound like a busybody to even care.
Usually that seems to be the reason for that, it's the reason why a lot of girls pretending to be trans still wear skirts and like very feminine things like sanrio characters. I'm pretty sure it's a phase for most of them but it's really shitty to see them putting down women who are content with their gender and don't feel the need to pretend to be a different one as an attempt for men to accept them.
Good to hear that you never went off the deep end though anon granted cringy teenage phases are a thing everyone goes through, I'd say I was probably worse since I was an anti feminist twat.
Yeah for some it's just a way of distancing yourself from a past sexual assault, then once you start to pass you are included in mens chats and you realise that even the most normal seeming guys come out with pedo shit when women aren't in the convo
You won't ever find a whole group of women talking about how fucking 12 year olds should be normal, in my college I met two groups of guys saying this and waiting for me to nod along
File: 1568331184710.jpeg (315.42 KB, 1478x1109, 6f7289706e78de54.jpeg)
No, I feel the same way as you. It's hard to find a single mainstream woman who hasn't objectified herself in at least one song. If it's relevant to the lyrics and message, and it isn't overt, I can take some sexuality in a song or video, but this is so blatant and plastic it's disgusting. How do people get off to this? The only pornographic content I like is slow, erotic, and usually still fully clothed. Naked ass in my face does nothing; it's actually repulsive. Now that I'm a radfem, I avoid anything "erotic" in general. I'm sick of being reduced to being a sellable product. My body is not a commodity, and it sure as hell isn't empowering. And, this is overlooking the song content entirely. There's no real melody, and lyrics are the same repeated drivel of sex, drugs, money, and being "bad" in general. Bleh.>>461546
She talks like she's in a cult. She has the Utah LDS stare.
TiFs get totally fucked in the head by T and start mimicking men's violence against women. "Misogyny is super gender affirming!!"
On the other hand though, TiMs are sexist before and after cutting their dicks off.
Most of them aren't even "truscum" (mental illness) just a lot of 30yo porn addicted men what the fuck anon, but yeah let's hate some 19yo annoying girls with internalized misogyny who totally did all this for a trend like women always do right?.>>461681
Agreed. I'm not saying TIF arent insufferable and disrespectful but saying you prefer transwomen over them? Tif's couldn't get to their insanity level no matter how many T shots they take, they're scary.
File: 1568335475456.png (252.07 KB, 960x444, transs.png)
I hardly have a problem with any particular group, there no context in which i will approach someone who is minding their own business and harass or question them , even less insult them or anything remotely like that but i don't appreciate the policing and the newspeak and all the made up rules that are now being enforced not only on female spaces but society in general. Its stepping over several lines and sensible people are being made to walk on eggshells and take abuse to cater to one specific group or other.
I guess i have a similar opinion with other topics that are now being de platformed or considered to racy or politically incorrect,. If some people just don't like others for whatever reason leave them fucking be with their opinion , you are allowed to challenge and dissent, if if weren't such a push and so much silencing and discrimination of opposition voices then maybe it wouldn't get so heated and antagonizing and some people would not feel the need to radicalize. This are very dangerous tools for politicians and political factions, pretty much anyone accused of "bigotry" for dissenting is thrown to the wolves and canceled even when they are bringing valid
and important issues to the table. Its happening with these feminists who feel trampled by the trans agenda and are not being listened but is not exclusive to them.
File: 1568345386425.jpeg (499.75 KB, 1536x1534, 6B8C2582-DBF3-4DD7-B2FB-084DB0…)
True. Only one of these can be considered ~art~. The rest are still performative conformity, regardless of how talented the artist is. I wish the “makeup community” would shut the fuck up about how empowering corporate shilling is and realize that not all makeup is equal.
>>461533>men who hate women, are addicted to porn and cry "muh mental illness" are okay, but women who hate themselves and want to escape female gender roles are the true demons and fakers
Nah, anon. Both groups are heavy in misogyny, which makes me dislike them, but the things MtFs say about women while trying to emulate us at the same time and play the perpetual victim
(even though many of them are actually violent or outright rapists) earn them a special place on my shitlist. Doesn't help that I've seen several transbians bitch that lesbians are evil for not wanting their "girldicks", while I've only seen maybe two FtMs try that with gay men.
FtMs are often annoying, eyeroll-worthy cows who bend over backwards for male validation, but they're pretty much just tomboyish, mentally ill handmaidens to me. MtFs are an actual threat, as many are just incels with trap fetishes (among others, like diaper shit) and bi/gay men with anger issues.
I can’t help but wonder if all of this extensive skincare stuff wouldn’t be deemed necessary if they didn’t wear makeup, or at least not so much, surely that must damage your skin to some extent?
I’ve never worn makeup and I don’t seem to have of the issues that I often see complained about skin wise, but I also don’t use any sort of skincare supplies so perhaps it’s more so a case of me not fucking up the natural balance of the oils? Kinda like how you shouldn’t wash your hair everyday or it’ll throw off it’s balance and make it a grease factory with split ends
how bad is your skin and what is the root of it? I had acne but the sad part is other than that my skin was bright, smooth, wrinkle free with rosie cheeks. Turns out I just had hormone problems and ended up getting hormone treatments to regulate them. the only thing I really have to worry about is those red marks after pimples go away
masks and oils can help ofc but shouldn't be a daily thing
Skinny people who say that they don't put on any weight even though they eat tons of unhealthy food just exaggerate how much unhealthy stuff they're eating
>>461900>I’ve been on accutane even and my acne still persisted lmao
could it be from dirt or a bad diet?> it could be hormonal but different birth controls never helped, drastically changing my diet hasn’t helped, living in different climates didn’t help, my current prescription has been the only thing to do much of anything.. it’s a mystery lol
yeah it definitely sounds like a dirt, stress or diet thing, do you stress often?
I had to do 2 rounds of accutane to get it to work and it took several years, then do a course of retinol cream. How long were you on it?
It's hard to imagine that if accutane doesn't work, something else will, it's such hardcore stuff. I recommend accutane to anyone with severe cystic acne because at that point it's a real medical issue that needs real medicine.
File: 1568467036769.jpg (Spoiler Image, 1.24 MB, 1453x1000, 2009118741_bxoU3PMY_0800.jpg)
Kim Jung Gi's art is soulless.
He has dynamism but like.. the themes are so redunant and also even the body type he draws for the girls are boring
At least someone like Ralph bashiki draws these interesting hourglass figures with thicc muscular thighs even if they look all the same. They just look too scrawny
Sometimes the people on gossip sites can be more amusing cows for me than the actual cows themselves.>>462457
Yeah, I remember seeing interviews with him saying that. He's pretty cumbrained, but I still like the detailing he does in a significant portion of his art.
I can see where they are coming from because some anons really are crazier than them.
I lurk Kiwifarms every now and some users are literally on every page of every thread that exists on the site. They lurk every thread every day, follow every cow there is. Even for me its crazy, sometimes i waste a lot of time but some anons really be batshit and addicted to stalking cows on another level.
File: 1568524138378.jpg (111.48 KB, 1188x876, CmWCMh7UEAAAULV.jpg)
he's kinda cute ngl
Is his job just letting people watch him draw?
Also, doesn't he have a wife and kids and lets them see his perverted drawings?
Go ahead if you can.
I'm completely consistent that natural selection would most likely affect me too.
File: 1568573691264.png (980.42 KB, 720x918, Screenshot_2019-09-04-15-12-54…)
On a simaler note these sailor moon redraws have become a 'remove soul' button.
File: 1568577117838.jpg (195.3 KB, 960x674, IMG_5203.JPG)
i think some of the first ones were good