[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password
(For post deletion)

File: 1567798973179.jpg (44.23 KB, 500x327, 9a4839cfc7dba5689ce7269447b693…)

No. 458822

No. 458830

Unpopular opinion,
I don't like when the OP pic is not an image of an unpopular opinion thing.

No. 458831

I decided to check out Megan Thee Stallion because so many people told me how amazing she supposedly is, but that mv is just plain disgusting. Why are wealthy and powerful women doing this to themselves??? It's like they're no longer real people, they're reducing themselves to gigantic shaking asses and tits. Repulsive and sad at the same time. Call me sheltered but I find that disturbing to look at.

No. 458832

>>458831
I haven't watched but the thumbnail looks like a video that you would only ever see on BET uncut (late night cable). Now it's just out there for girls to see easily.
Maybe the thumbnail is misleading and I'm too old.

No. 458834

>>458830
i'm pissed the vent thread OPs are no longer actual vent pictures

No. 458837

>>458831
Propaganda so other women believe that being a hoe is soo ~empowering~ and other women will emulate them. Tbh this song fucckkkinggg sucks and Megan isn’t even hot

No. 458839

>>458831
My straight friends all talk about how mediocre dick is, these women all sing about how great dick is.. who do I believe? lol

No. 458844

>>458831
The visuals are straight up a worse Nicki Minaj. Wasn't cute on her, isn't cute on this bitch.

No. 458846

>>458839
i'm straight and the average dick is extremely mediocre, your friends are right. a man who actually knows how to please and isn't selfish is one of a kind.

No. 458847

I honestly just like content and don't care the slightest about the creators. I almost feel like walking in a mine field every time i mention something i liked consuming because someone would go "but anon! how dare you, dont you know that artist flipped off a fan 3 years ago?!!!" ugh.

Are you listening to a song to see if you like it or are you googling the artist entire life to see if its ok to even listen to the song and see you liked it? give me a break. A movie or an album or a tv show won't suddenly change their intrinsic qualities because one of the artists is a meanie or a nazi or even a criminal. Let them go to jail but don't start messing with me and start shaming my taste in media if i still enjoy the work for what it is.

It sounds ironic because i am on a gossip site but i really only find entertaining to be voyeuristic with trainwreck people who are not even famous, not the Kardashians or Quentin Tarantino. I really don't care about the creators that much and find cancel culture a silly concept at best, a dystopian phenomenon with scary implications for the future at worst.

No. 458854

>>458831
This is utter garbage, holy moly. I only know one female rapper/artist who’s empowering an have great messages an is really talented an that’s Snow tha product. I may be biast but I also use to enjoy nicki at one point long long ago aswell so.. take it as is, go listen to snow and see how you like her.

No. 458865

>>458831

I hate rap, hip hop, reggaton, trap, all that shit so fucking much.

No. 458875

>>458831
I agree with you. Celeb women do not even register as actual women to me. They're like… plastic beings. I caught a glimpse of this cardi b x bernie sanders interview, and bernie looks like a (ugly, haggard) regular old man and cardi looks like a plastic doll.

>>458837
I am not looking forward to that Stripper movie with JLo coming out and hoeism being cool for the next couple months.

No. 458898

>>458830
yeah its stupid. I hate how every single uo thread is linked too, there are too many to keep doing that now and no one is ever going to re read them anyways. only link the last one or don't link any at all.

No. 458899

>>458831
I used to think I just hated rap/hip-hop because basically the only thing that gets popular is cumbrain/porn star aesthetic BS like this and Cardi B.
I wish more female rappers like Janelle Monae, Kilo Kish, Noname and Angel Haze were popular. It's never them, and always this shit instead. I'm fucking tired of hearing about how great it is to be made of plastic and have straight sex. Pop music and culture is so annoying.

No. 458912

>>458899
>I used to think I just hated rap/hip-hop because basically the only thing that gets popular is cumbrain/porn star aesthetic BS like this and Cardi B.

i hate it all, even the ones who think they are being artsy fartsy and clever. I detest all of it. Its all a scourge.

No. 458921

male rappers act like trash all the time and sing about sex and barely anyone says anything, not to mention male rappers can look like fat fucking goblins and no one says anything but female rappers have to spend thousands pumping up their lips, tits, ass and sucking fat out their waist because anytime a female rapper doesn't look like a complete freak of nature nobody in the community can never stfu about her ass and tits

anytime ariana grande involves herself in the rap community literally 90% of the discussion is about her body not being curvy enough, it's ridiculous, meanwhile most male rappers are hideous potatoes and no one says shit(pink-pill derailing)

No. 458934

>>458921
>>458899
Y'all need some early 90s Queen Latifah in your lives if you don't have her there already. I actually didn't like the music as much at first but I loved the message in "U.N.I.T.Y." and really wished we heard more women rappers like this in the mainstream. It's grown on me so much musically and I just really love that this was a hit.
"Who are you calling a bitch?"

No. 458935

>>458912
You're entitled to your (wrong) opinion, anon, lmao.
I hate all flamenco music.

No. 458936

>>458921
Anon, are you really somehow still surprised when you come across misogynistic double standards?

No. 458937

>>458934
man I love this song. i love queen latifah

No. 458939

>>458935

Rap is to music what Le Petomane is to theater.

No point discussing on the quality of the farts.

No. 458941

>>458939
Once more, you're entitled to your (wrong) opinion, anon. Not sure why you reported to me, but there's no accounting for taste.

No. 458948

I'll be that bitch and say I secretly love making fun of ugly folks with shitty personality. Unless it's a disability or deformity, I'll take every cheap shot I can get. Like damn you're ugly inside AND out. What came first the chicken or the egg?

No. 458949

>>458921
Agreed. The only male rappers I even give the time of day are either clipping., now-irrelevant ones from the 90s, or little no-name internet ones.
I'm tired of hearing all these ugly, loud fuckers encouraging drug dealing, abusive behavior, and happily insulting all girls that don't look exactly the way they want them to.
Rap needs to go down the same path as rock IMO. The edgelord scrote-made trash gets old, so it's shuffled into its own little territory (sort of like how genres like "pornogrind" aren't considered the face or pinnacle of rock or metal music as a whole) and the artists that get famous are the ones who actually start creating sincere work with meaning. I don't care if people just want something to shake their ass to in a club, I'm just sick of that sort of thing being given all the accolades, and I'm done with men getting passes to do, say and look however/whatever they want (and this is both in and out of rap).(pink-pill derailing)

No. 458951

>>458899
>>458949
Same, I used to think I hated all rap but then I looked into female rappers, rappers from foreign countries and those who rapped about different topics than the typical ones in rap music. So many popular rap songs (and the videos that accompany them) by males are extremely misogynistic and I feel like nobody talks about it enough. Maybe they do in fact but in my experience everytime somebody tries to bring it up online people always have to derail it with stuff like "but classic rock is misogynstic too". I totally agree that classic rock and other genres also have their issues but we can still have a discussion on the issues with rap too.

No. 458954

>>458854
Hey, fellow Snow fan! I love her, she's so fucking good and I hope she doesn't fall prey to this shit. I was a Nicki fan too, and I still love listening to her older stuff……I hate how it feels inevitable, like you get a female rapper who hits a certain point and she HAS to go sexdoll. No one gets to stay normal.

No. 458957

>>458955 goddamn, is spelling that hard? Good unpopular opinion tho, i do not agree but mumble rap is fucking stupid imo.

No. 458964

>>458946
the only male rappers/group I listen to Akala and The Coup. And only just like 5 coup songs because I like the beat.

anyway this song is what made me decide to completely drop mainstream male rappers. i still give women a try now and then but i'm tired of the hot girl summer shit.

No. 458971

>>458951
>Maybe they do in fact but in my experience everytime somebody tries to bring it up online people always have to derail it with stuff like "but classic rock is misogynstic too".
I think people who say this are missing the point that rock largely cleaned up its act. It has long since been allowed to expand and prove its versatility in content, lyricism and execution. The misogynistic shit may still exist, but it's not what's centered as the face of the genre anymore. These days, when you say "rock", you can mean anything from the earliest stuff, like Sister Rosetta Tharpe, to The Beatles, to your local emo kid's favorite band (MCR), to riot grrl, to Arctic Monkeys, to someone like Mitski. It's diverse to the point where if you say "I hate rock music", people will probably look at you funny and/or think you're an autist.
On the other hand, when you say "rap", most people who haven't done a lot of digging will just think "Oh, like Chris Brown, Cardi B and Nicki Minaj? Uh…Lil Peep?". If you say "I hate rap music", people will probably assume you just hate misogynistic, superficial, and/or hypersexual lyrics, because that's basically the only content that gets praised. The true versatility and artistic potential of this genre is completely ignored in order to sell the same shitty images and stories that we've all seen. It's annoying. Logically, saying you hate rap in itself makes about as much sense as saying you don't like hearing the human voice in music at all (and there are actually people like that, though it's pretty rare) unless it's singing, but because we're shown the same annoying iterations of rap repeatedly, the entire medium of creativity is pigeonholed. 99% of its potential is not allowed to blossom, and I hate that. I was surprised to learn that even Nicki Minaj has some good music ("The Crying Game" is lovely), but with shit like this >>458831 and Anaconda making up the bulk of her most popular tracks and repertoire, I can never call myself a "fan" with a straight face. There's too much garbage mixed in, and she's constantly pandering to the lowest common denominator by stuffing her ass and portraying herself as a sentient blow-up doll whenever possible.
Also, this is an unpopular opinion, but if Chris Brown and xxxtentacion are allowed to be famous despite being objectively horrible people, Azealia Banks should be allowed too. Awful words and actions aside, she runs circles around all the popular rappers these days. At least all her music doesn't sound the same, and isn't solely about being a stripper or having huge tits/ass and getting money.

No. 458982

>>458854
I get that Snow is a good rapper, but anytime I've tried to listen to her music it's just so fucking boring and bland. She isn't a good songwriter imo. My favorite female rappers are Jean Grae and Rapsody.

>Also, this is an unpopular opinion, but if Chris Brown and xxxtentacion are allowed to be famous despite being objectively horrible people, Azealia Banks should be allowed too. Awful words and actions aside, she runs circles around all the popular rappers these days. At least all her music doesn't sound the same, and isn't solely about being a stripper or having huge tits/ass and getting money.

I've always thought this exact same thing. Obviously Azealia is a mentally ill shit-stirrer but nothing she has done or said is objectively worse than anything popular male artists have done. Chris Brown literally tied to kill Rihanna and people still defend him to this day. When it comes to Azealia though people say she can't be the GOAT because she's an "asshole." Meanwhile, Nas was accused of abuse by his ex-wife Kelis.

No. 458992

>>458982
Seconding this.

Also, when I decided to accept that I just didn't like male rappers, I immediately had such a better time. Who are some of your faves, anons? I like Leikeli47, Sammus, Nitty Scott, Sampa the Great, Nadia Rose, Lady Leshurr, and Jean Grae of course. The fact that Jean Grae never got bigger really chaps my ass, it feels like there's no room for her. I always think like, could we ever have a female Frank Ocean? Who's THAT good and THAT boundary pushing AND female, without reducing her to something more consumable?

No. 458994

>>458992
Tierra Whack is good for non-sexualized rappers. I like Doja Cat too, she's sexualized but she does it in a weird, funny way, almost like parody so it doesn't bother me as much.

No. 458996

>>458992
I was about to mention Sammus but you beat me to it, Psalm One and Tierra Whack

No. 459001

>>458994
Lil simz

No. 459002

>>458992
Her bars are flawless anon and she isn’t sexualised at all

No. 459003

This is the only good male rap song in the past ten years and no one can convince me otherwise

No. 459004

>>458994
Rico nasty is also a cool, non sexualised female rapper.

>>458971
Fucking hell. Azealia Banks really is a tragedy. She runs circles around other rappers females and males, lyrically. She's a great lyricist and story teller. I like how some of her songs like miss camaraderie sound like fables. Mental illness and substance addiction really is sad.

>>459003
The bar is so low for male rappers, I don't even bother listening to male rappers.

No. 459006

>>458992
Ooh wow. I'm new to rap so everything in this post is new to me I can't wait to check it out. I've been working my way through things sort of chronologically and my personal favs so far are

JJFad, but they are very hit-or-miss
Yoyo, particularly Make Way
Champ MC, particularly Ghetto Flava
Lauryn Hill, every album great
Rapsody of course, I'm addicted to the song "pay up"

I work alone long hours in a lab so I can listen to the filthiest shit I want however loud I want it's lovely. My guiltiest pleasure is Deadly Venoms but I wouldn't reccomend them. Unless you're into that. Their vulgarity is cathartic for me.

No. 459012

The second you make a topic or opinion about gender politics is the moment it becomes derailing.
The pink-pill thread exists for a reason, use it.

No. 459014

>>458992
Some more female rappers that haven't been mentioned yet: Gifted Gab, Blimes, Omeretta the Great, and Rocky Badd (but she's always involved in a lot of beef.)
The Buttress is also very good, especially if you like rap that sounds wutang-esque.

No. 459038

File: 1567837345325.png (780.17 KB, 463x613, lmao.PNG)

Indie weeb designers make ugly as sin clothes

No. 459040

Not really an unpopular opinion except on this message board, but I like h3h3. Ethan can be obnoxious and out of touch sometimes but I actually like them as a couple and like their podcast. Plus Hila is cool.

No. 459045

I don't really like the fact that children/family movies have "adult jokes" in them; not necessarily because I find it inappropriate, but because it seems people think the only way an adult could enjoy something for kids is to shove sexual jokes and stuff. Idk I find it very immature and stupid, like adults can only enjoy something is there are suggestive theme in it

On a kinda related note, adult cartoons fucking suck. They're not for adults at all, they're made with the ideas that teenagers have of adults - swearing, drugs, drinking, sex, dirty jokes. None of it is funny and interesting in the slightest. And I'm sick of fourteen year olds thinking they're some philosopher because they watched Bojack Horseman and think they know everything about life and the world. I dislike this promotion of nihilism and making everyone think it's cool and smart to be miserable, and these kinds of show just reinforce that, consciously or not

No. 459059

>>459040
Same, i dont really get the hate. Some bits can get annoying and its not my fave podcast i go to when I need something in the background but i do keep up with it and its alright.

I like that he was the only one to speak up about pedo Michael Jacksons documentary without being a pseudo intellectual trying to grasp at straws to prove that michael wasnt guilty.

No. 459060

late 90s/early 2000s fashion was a fucking train wreck, and I hate seeing twenty and thirty year olds go on about how cool it is while dressing like their pre-teen selves. When somebody posts an outfit inspired by that time period its always stuff 11-16 year olds wore. Nobody ever dresses like an adult from then because the clothes were ugly AF.

No. 459061

>>459060
I hate most things about that era honestly..

No. 459064

The only male rapper I frequently listen to is Aesop Rock

No. 459069

>>459060
Mainstream fashion yes, it was awful. But I like the kinda grunge Avril Lavigne style and I would wear it again.

No. 459080

File: 1567849897330.jpg (284.4 KB, 1300x1233, destinys-child-arriving-at-the…)

>>459060
I think the appeal is how relaxed they were compared to today, kids dressed like kids and not businesswomen or fashion models, teens could dress like teens, college kids could dress like college kids and so on, your facial features, makeup and hair wasn't analyzed by everyone, people actually looked human and not like dolls, you could dress fun and comfy and style yourself and your room in such a way, you didn't HAVE to dress like in expensive overdone clothing to look good and put together, it wasn't a big deal if you didn't have your ass and hips stick out 4 feet, phones were simple and you could go out and have fun without everybody snapchatting every moment

now it just feels like if you go out in something colorful or you don't have a perfect figure, you end up on some fashion don't twitter post because some asshole took a creepshot

No. 459081

>>459064
Same. He’s tops.

No. 459084

>>>/ot/458993
agreed but I could add I understand if people want to be poly, I'm not one to judge until they themselves start judging others

most young western polygamous people are either weird fat fucks who go on twitter too much, insecure thots, trendy tumblr folk, or involves an obvious shitty relationship dynamic of the girl being insecure and desperate and the guy being a bitter needy insecure asshole

No. 459085

>>459080
Im tired of seeing this cause the 2000s was mean as fuck to every woman who didnt have a perfectly skinny barbie figure, so much even Beyonce was fat shamed by a lot of publication and people because of her so called big thighs and not having a size 00 body. Yeah no one could take creep shots but the 2000s were mean as fuck for women. Yeah its true you didnt have to look extremely perfect and snatched like you do now but there were still overaching anal perfectionist standards put on women. Honestly I say everything after the 90s as far as female beauty standards have been too porn influenced and awful.

No. 459086

>>458831
I like Megan but yeah I gotta agree, cause her lyrics dont make much sense to me since she brags about having a big ass and sexualizes other women and basically only praises men for having dicks and says her only type is money, effectively catering to this sex worker aesthetic lifestyle that is destroying the mentalities of people consuming this shit.

I mean, personal life and rumors aside, cause I heard Meg was bisexual and fucked women, but her lyrics dont even come across as that, its just look at me im hot, my body is sexy, i use it to get money off of men, hmm hmm reducing myself to a walking stereotype is so empowering guise.

Like what I dont get is why she cant make music focusing on a mans physical traits, or charisma, or sensuality, thats empowering no? Its fucking stupid old school songs do this more than a so called post feminist society lmao

No. 459089

>>459085
>Im tired of seeing this cause the 2000s was mean as fuck to every woman who didn't have a perfectly skinny barbie figure, so much even Beyonce was fat-shamed by a lot of publication and people because of her so-called big thighs and not having a size 00 body. Yeah no one could take creepshots but the 2000s were mean as fuck for women

I guess, but it wasn't as rampant as it is now, the worst they did back then was leave an unflattering magazine article, nowadays if your body isn't perfect nobody can shut up about it, you get meme'd over twitter, anytime your name pops up anywhere half the comments will be about your body, they didn't over-analyze things like ratios, shoulders, chest width, etc. you can still be considered attractive and feminine even if your nose isn't small and button-like or your lips are pumped to your nose

I'm not saying shaming never happened but it's definitely not as insane, obsessive or strict as what people nowadays are doing

No. 459091

>>459089
I guess yeah compared but I dont have good memories of the 2000s tbh. But then again my dumbass was on the internet most of the time in the 2000s so all I saw was the rude autism become mainstream by the 2010s that I always saw.

No. 459093

Thanks Anons for all the women rapper suggestions!

No. 459100

>>459089
It's nostalgia goggles, you're remembering the positives. Beauty standards were not lax in the 2000s, you were likely too young to see things properly.

No. 459120

File: 1567866211955.jpeg (34.28 KB, 450x299, 56BA972D-1984-4D8B-AC04-3E2182…)

Sushi isn’t that great.

No. 459122

>>459120
I don't like it with raw fish, but cooked crab sushi is absolutely delish

No. 459123

File: 1567866358193.jpeg (498.17 KB, 1936x968, 85A44735-87BF-4A3B-B079-9BCFC2…)

>>459089
Unless you consumed a lot of age inappropriate celebrity content, you probably were too young to absorb those messages.

I was subscribed to CosmoGirl in the early 2000s, this magazine was targeted at young girls and was filled with diet and exercise advice, which would never happen in a magazine now. Celebrity gossip rags like Star would shame any celeb woman who dare left the house not perfectly made up and publish the photos for everyon to see. Britney Spears was mercilessly mocked by the whole world for putting on a few and performing the 2007 VMAs and not being perfectly thin.

No. 459126

File: 1567866586485.jpeg (52.44 KB, 300x300, 05B6707D-E6D4-44F9-9A97-E28D85…)

>>459123
Quotes from an archived Today.com article called “Was Media unfair to called Britney Spears Fat?” dated September 10th, 2007

>But what about the nastiest comments of all — those about her body? “Lard and Clear,” read Monday’s headline in the New York Post.


>“The bulging belly she was flaunting was SO not hot,” wrote E! Online. And so on.


>More profoundly, in an age where skinny models and skeletal actresses are under scrutiny for the message they’re sending young girls, what does it say that we’re excoriating a young woman for a little thickness in her middle?


Keep in mind, Britney only looked like this. Things aren’t perfect now, but Lizzo was able to perform on that same VMA stage a couple weeks ago. A fat woman would’ve never even been invited to the VMAs back then.

No. 459127

>>459123
I grew up in he 90's with no internet and only magazines and kids/teen TV to influence us, the 90's mags were cruel when it comes to how they wanted young girls to look. Nowadays they might favor a small waist but bigger bum/hips/thighs but in the 90s the pressure was on to be skinny from head to toe

At least now naturally hourglass or slightly pear shaped women are seen as having a womanly figure, 'tiny all over' was the only acceptable option back then

No. 459131

i wouldn't mind if laboratories used felons for the testing of their experiments. they are completely useless anyway so their existence could at least have some meaning.

No. 459135

>>459131
I've heard of lab rabbits being blinded by having products put in their eyes. Now that you mention this it'd be a way of dealing with sex offenders, especially pedos. Blind them seeing as men are so visual when it comes to sexual enjoyment

No. 459171

>>459126
This era was so fucking stupid, I swear. Thats why I cant stand any praise for it when they basically shamed women for looking like women. God forbid you have sexually dimorphic features unless youre a porn star, oooh no.

Shit like this makes me honestly annoyed as fuck.

No. 459172

>>459131
what about the wrongly accused innocents in prison

No. 459179

>>459123
>>459127

I always felt like that after mid 90s era was just punishment for feminism gaining traction in the 60S and 70S. Like you sluts dare ask for female empowerment? Okay, suffer the consequences and now you either have to be skinny anachan tier or a bimbo porn star to be considered beautiful in our society, or we will mercilessly mock you. It felt like some fucked up psyop thing tbh

No. 459184

File: 1567871907368.jpg (153.04 KB, 925x1280, b13d472a2b75f9e7dfd98fb1f75881…)

>>459126
Yeah, I'm really gonna need people to pull back "girls could dress like girls and things were better!!!" style talk. Jesus, even a little further back, the mocking of Monica Lewinsky as "fat" was EVERYWHERE, and like, sure, you can cherry pick one picture of Ashley Tisdale looking like a young girl, but there were fucking "countdown to the Olsen Twins' 18th bday" on the radio, all the Friends girls were RAIL thin, and even Christina Aguilera's first big single was about "you gotta rub me the right way~." The makeup was subtler, but it was still there, and the emphasis on these insane impossible perfectly flat stomachs was omnipresent.

I don't think there was a "better" time. It's all just worse in different ways. You go back to the 80s, it was hyper toned, giant titted, enormous hair Barbie types. The forties and fifties, women were wearing girdles and tons of makeup and heels. You go further and you got corsets. There were maybe eras where we were more forgiving of certain flaws, but there was no time when things were really, actually better.

No. 459192

File: 1567872052818.jpg (15.17 KB, 166x258, Backlash,_first_edition.jpg)

>>459179
This might be interesting to you, anon. Written in 91 so it's not exactly the era you're talking about, but you're onto something. I'm reading a book right now called 90's Bitch that's similar, and I'm really digging it so far.

No. 459196

>>459179
My memories of the 90s are teens writing into agony aunt pages about wanting boob jobs and it being the time when fully shaved pussy really became an expectation

The fashion was trashy, I'll always remember a store near me selling 'bald pussy' T-shirts that had a print of one of those hairless cats on it.. it was a store for 13-17 year olds, not even adult sizes. My mother was horrified when we spotted it and I pretended I didn't know what it meant

No. 459201

File: 1567872680357.png (278.33 KB, 653x410, Queen_of_Mean.png)

>>459184
It's nice to see that disney kids can now have body types that aren't rail thin

No. 459202

>>459184
Yup thats about that time when pedophilia became en vogue.. seriously fuck this decade everything suffered from it, obesity rates, fashion, music, entertainment, just fuck it.

>>459192
Thanks anon, I will check it out!

No. 459205

>>459172
It's for the ones who we do know are definitely guilty.

No. 459218

While the look of the 90s-2000s wasn't great by any means it was and still is more healthier compared to the shit that's being peddeled today

Comically large asses,boobs and lips and woverall women looking like carcicutes of human

No. 459219

I don't think female pedophiles are anywhere as bad as male pedophiles

Let young boys be in relationships with older women

No. 459221

>>459218
They are vastly unhealthy in different ways. Before was starving yourself to death to be thin. Now it's plastic surgery and body modifications galore. Pick your poison.

No. 459222

>>459219
Hard disagree.

No. 459223

>>459218
Both are bad
Stop

No. 459224

Next is gonna be eating yourself to a comawhile having pedophiliac features as much as possible. Its gonna get worse

No. 459225

>>459221
TBF starving yourself to death is cheaper then surgeries and body modifications and also one recover from anorexia but surgeries and body modifications leave permanent damage to the body

No. 459229

>>459225
Yeah but it fucking sucks. What if I wanna build muscle because I love being active? Starving myself just aint gonna cut it. And to be frank, I will always love eating , which is why I make my physical activity level high, which I love to do, specifically so I can lose weight while still eating a lot. Also, starving makes you weak, and frail, and is a very misogynist ideal to put on women when you specifically want them like that cause its sexy for scrotes. I dont like it.

No. 459231

>>459219
I agree with the first part because almost all male pedophiles penetrate their victims and that is very physically damaging and emotionally traumatizing for the child. Female pedophiles still cause emotional damage even if there usually isn't any physical harm or penetration, still doesn't mean they should be in relationships with little kids.

>>459225
Anon, staring yourself is very damaging. Your body is literally cannibalizing itself and leads to organ malfunction and failure. In severe cases you can't recover fully from it. In comparison breast/butt implants, liposuction, fat transfers aren't nearly as bad. Ofc they are not natural but none of those cause damage to your major organs like heart, kidneys, liver, as well as your hormones and reproductive system. Starvation destroys your whole body, not to mention how it worsens your mental health as well, when your whole body is practically shutting down.

No. 459233

>>459225
recover from anorexia

I've always heard that anorexia is like alcoholism, that it never fully leaves you and you can relapse at any moment or under enough stress

The whole big ass trend is weird to witness as a 30 something year old. A big bum was the one worst thing that you could have when I was growing up. Funny how quickly trends change

No. 459235

>>459184
I personally prefer this era because there's more variety. The Kardashian look may be in vogue, but before then, it was either the Paris Hilton/"porn star with huge tits but everything else skinny" look, or the heroin chic look, anyway. Plastic surgery addiction is definitely not being newly introduced to the "trend" lexicon.
Besides, it's not hard to find alternatives at all. The internet has made it all so easy. There are so many aesthetics to mix and match, all sorts of individuals doing their own thing that you can look up to, and so many different communities to join so you can find "your type" of people in. Things have really changed for the better. I think this is the only era where Lizzo, Adele, Normani, Grimes and Ariana Grande could've all been successful at the exact same time. Fat is okay, skinny is okay, muscular is okay, and almost everything in between is acceptable as well. Compare that to the insane standards and nitpicking of >>459126.
The only downside is that even non-celebrities, when creating an internet persona, are expected to be polished and retouched to perfection, to the point where it defies reality.

No. 459238

>>459235
Agreed

No. 459253

File: 1567877591436.jpg (103.52 KB, 675x1200, DqcycI5W4AEQy37.jpg)

niche rant incoming, but my unpopular opinion is that i think the white pube (uk "art critic" duo) are a pair of posh, hypocritical, fake-woke, spoiled children.

i tried to get on board with them bc they seem to be in high demand at the moment and i thought i was missing something. turns out i wasn't. anything they don't understand (art history, for instance lmao) they declare irrelevant and try to say things like love island and the legend of zelda are more culturally enriching. to me it just screams wilful ignorance of all the really hard work contemporary art historians are putting into decolonising art history.

they went to the rca and have an inflated sense of importance/ego as a result. they act as though they are above reproach and criticism themselves because of their "positionality" (both liverpudlian, i think, which they seem to think makes them some kind of oppressed because they're not londoners? one's british asian and one's just a regular ol' white uggo who claims she's working class). this is something that especially pisses me off actually bc they're from such privilege (i hate this game of oppression top trumps but they're such big players of it that i feel i have to mention it) - the bame one's dad is a fucking investment banker and the other one owns a gallery in her mid-twenties (don't care how you rationalise it, that reeks of family money). and again, both studied at the rca which is off-limits to anyone from an actually poor background bc of the living costs in london and the expectation that your family will contribute towards your education. like any posh fake-woke kids, they seem to obfuscate this because it compromises their image. all of this has afforded them this sense of superiority where they feel justified in attacking ppl and responding to honest criticism with nastiness, blitheness, and siccing their followers on the commentor.
for instance if either of them saw this, i can guarantee it would screenshot and put on their insta with some shitty comment, and their hoardes of lazy, ignorant student stans/early career art kids would be like omg girls no u r the best, everyone donate to twp's patreon 4 emotional damages and their intellectual labour!
that's another thing, it always seems like these characters are constantly lauded for their Very Important Work - it's some kind of catchphrase in sjw circles.
they're also so incapable of discussing their thoughts and takes and ideas that they frequently close their comments sections, which actually seems like shitty praxis for what they're purporting to be all about.

the thing that really soured them for me though was their attack on nina edge (picrel), a bame artist who does work for housing in liverpool, who tweeted through a community account that she was legitimately concerned about the safety of women with the introduction of self-id laws. that was it. they witch-hunted her on social media and sought to get her fired from her position at ljmu. completely disregarding the fact that edge has been operating on the "right side of history" since before they were even born - in active, beneficial roles in bame, lower-income, and rural communities. what the fuck are they doing for others? all i see them doing is travelling, playing the fucking nintendo switch at "work", bullying or shitting on people, and refusing to learn anything that is remotely challenging or grow as people???? so intensely self-righteous and ignorant.

and they're somehow above reproach. perhaps because weak art students love their idea that you don't have to care about learning anything important or difficult, because you can just use identity politics and """intuition""" and an overgrown ego born from personal privilege to just thug your way through stuff.

No. 459268

i know she is a tool but i love simply kenna/cozykitsune's style and aesthetic. imo she is gorgeous

No. 459279

>>459268
This isn’t really unpopular though. While most people hate Kenna herself, they still like her aesthetic.
I personally don’t like her aesthetic because it’s just plain boring.

No. 459289

>>459268
i think she's really pretty with natural styles

No. 459368

>>459268
Kenna is actually quite pretty and I don't see what's so sperg worthy about her, at this point it just feels like dried milk and lots of weebs being jealous of her

No. 459372

do ppl really hate lil lunchbox? i watch her vids once in a while and she's cringy but entertaining. she seems like a pretty decent person too, she just got issues lol

No. 459377

>>459268
I'm not a big fan personally, I find the all brown autumn theme a bit lame. The pink/pastel colour scheme was nice for a while but she stopped that already.

Anyway, ever since reading the spergy jealous nitpicking about her on PULL she seems infinitely less tragic compared to how pathetic some weebs can be. Her existence just reminds me of them instead of the dumb shit she's said/done herself.

No. 459416

>>457839
>>457892
>>457922

on her premium snapchat she always tell us to have a nice day and stuff

No. 459436

why do people even like Steven Universe? i tried to watch it and i only made it a few eps in, it didn't fucking interest me at all and I didn't care for it, tried to watch it and didnt understand what the hype was, ppl who aren't tumblr sjws like it too… and what is supposed to be appealing about it, what?

like call me a nostalgiafag… but I'm not really fond of modern kids cartoons and every one I've tried to watch hasn't appealed to me at all, I barely get into any of them at all, but I can rewatch stuff from my childhood all day and I can watch some modern adult animation, maybe it's the generational gap?

No. 459446

i think lil peep was actually a really talented kid and fairly introspective without flexing too much and he was actually pretty unconventional in some respects considering his surroundings

No. 459447

>>459436
Yeah maybe you’re just getting old anon.

No. 459450

>>459436
I can vibe with a bit of Steven Universe. I enjoy watching cartoons made by people who grew up watching
the same cartoons I watched growing up. I would never admit this in my normal life lmao

No. 459451

>>459436
Idk. I’ve watched it and I don’t call myself a fan, I don’t like it but I don’t hate watch it either. To me it’s just a show I picked up and binged a season because it was colorful, it was there and I stuck around to see how it ends. Maybe with a little Stockholm syndrome and thinking, until it ends, there’s a chance it’ll stop being boring and wishy-washy. Well I stuck around and it doesn’t get any better.

There’s a lot of weird "ironic" humor in modern cartoons (and SU) that I don’t like because a bunch of bland cal-arts adults digging elbows at each other doesn’t make up for the lack of soul in a good cartoon and being ‘self-aware’ doesn’t mean the execution wasn’t flawed or that your concept was shit in the first place. To be honest, if you’re an adult and you’re not minding anyone’s kids I think there’s no point in watching children’s cartoons when there is a whole world of other media out there to engage with that isn’t restricted by who it’s aimed at. To actually answer your question I think SU’s ‘popularity’ is down to its LGBT clout while it’s trendy and turbo nerds can salivate over the anime references. If this aired a decade ago I doubt there would be any lefty Tumblr people for it to appeal to. Tbh all the fans of this cartoon I’ve seen are twenty somethings with zero culture and heavily involved in fandoms.

No. 459454

It Chapter Two is a whack ass comedy film smh

No. 459460

>>459454
Came here to post this exact thing anon kek Its not better than that cheesy ass 1990 mini series. Ending was boring and the movie is way too long for what it is.

No. 459509

Oreos are fucking nasty and disgusting

No. 459512

>>459454
True but I legit think it's hard to adapt the adult part of IT anyway. They even cut out some plot points that would have made it even funnier (the turtle and bill's wife ordeal).

No. 459518

>>459454
Stephen King fucking sucks and I wish more people would recognize that.

No. 459525

>>459509
I'm British and I think they taste awful. The biscuit part is so dry. Custard creams are better.

No. 459526

>>459518
He does but I really liked the Stand.

No. 459553

>>459219

>creepy fujo aunt has looged in

No. 459560

>>459219
I remember this pathetic libfem going around on this website whining about the ebil radfems on pinkpill and gender critical, saying that this site had a "female pedophile" problem saying that the women on this website were encouraging female pedophilia and that it's not as bad as male pedophilia. a bunch of anons pointed out that this was bullshit. this is probably her just being a salty cunt trying to make us look bad. or it's a scrot doing the same thing.

>>459224
what the fuck does "pedophiliac" features mean? do you mean retaining child like features?

No. 459565

I don't care how good it is, no superhero/capeshit movie deserves any movie award.

>>459219
I really hope you're joking

No. 459566

>>459219
I mean penetrating someone against their will or when they are underdeveloped is worse than other types of molestation cos pain and injury are an added reality but it's still fucked up

Boys who are sexually abused can grow up to become pedos themselves so it creates a cycle of more kids being abused..

No. 459569

>>459565
>I don't care how good it is, no superhero/capeshit movie deserves any movie award.

The promotion budget for Joker alone is probably a lot more than the production budget for all the rest of the movies on Venice.

Its very skewed. Like how they keep giving Pixar the same Oscar award for animation every year. The other movies that compete all have like a tenth of the budget and are these passion projects that take forever to complete but its always some Pixar 200 millon dollar movie that gets it at the end, for everyone else being a nominee is a good enough award.

No. 459572

>>459202
70s were the pedo decade.

No. 459574

I miss the HWNDU stream and some parts of the first seasons are really wholesome. I still go and rewatch it from time to time :(

No. 459581

>>459038
Is that omocat?

No. 459595

>>459572
>>459572
Not on that mainstream and consumerist level the 2000s did though

No. 459598

>>459581
Not that anon but this looks like something Mookie would draw? But it's been a while since I followed either of them and I have no idea if Mookie is willing to draw things that are not related to haikyuu.

No. 459607

Chocolate flavor is meh, Vanilla is infinitely better.

No. 459611

>>459574
brittany's boyfriend was hot as fuck

No. 459665

I hate the level two chef guy from these series of videos, people who laugh at their own jokes are obnoxious and his laugh makes my ears hurt. Dude needs to lay off the helium and food network for a couple days.

No. 459666

>>459553
How is she a fujo if she's saying 'let young boys be in relatonships with older women'?
A fujo is a girl who likes BL (pedophilic or not) not straight pedophilia.

No. 459674

>>459611
the one who had a meltdown over eggs or whatever?

No. 459676

>>459674
The horror movie music in the audio of the video gets me every time.

I hate Brittany Venti but I was actually really worried about her when her boyfriend started breaking plates in front of her and screaming at her, dude's not right in the head.

No. 459679

>>459674
yeah, he is really handsome. he kinda looks like leonardo, river phoenix and the alikes. such a shame that he's nuts.

No. 459686

>>459679
in that he looks like squinty-eyed white trash with a perc habit from loxahatchee as do the rest of them without the styling, i guess.

No. 459688

>>459607
hard agree

No. 459690

>>459219
oh hai yaoimaster

No. 459694

wanting to fuck other people while in a relationship is just as bad as literally cheating. just NOT doing it is only better in that there's no health risk and risk of literally leaving, but it's just as bad otherwise. most people shouldnt be in relationships.

so many people are allowed to lust over others while in relationships and it's seen as ok because they don't literally cheat. what's the difference? the desire is still there

No. 459696

>>459607
>>459688
same, such a shame "vanilla" is used to describe something basic or unadventurous. have you TASTED vanilla?

No. 459704

>>459694
True, we should all chemically castrate our partner and ourselves immediately upon entering a relationship!!

No. 459705

>>459694
Retard-chan, you can't control attraction. I'd agree if you said something like "continuing to fantasize over and cyberstalking other people while not single is cheating" I could agree but you literally can't control merely being attracted to a random person.

No. 459706

>>459705
>>459704
attraction doesn't mean necessarily wanting to fuck someone, but if you're the type of indiscriminate person that desires lots of people sexually (as many men are), i dont understand what the point is of being in a relationship that emphasizes monogamy. i don't want to fuck other people. i expect the same of someone else. i guess that's not so common or something.

No. 459708

I wish it was socially acceptable to say "yes, sex is a crucial part of relationships for me" without being seen as a nymphomaniac. It's not shallow to think sexual compatibility is more important than romance. I'm not going to deal with a man just for his personality or looks if he's completely shit in bed. If he can't do the fucking bare minimum to make me cum I'm dipping, I don't care how much of a great personality you have.
It's like when troons say "are you reducing the gender you're attracted to their genitals? there's more to relationships than just sex!!".. yes, there is, but it's still really important. A significant other is basically a best friend that you fuck after all.

No. 459709

>>459708
i agree with u but i wish people wouldnt shit on me bc i dont want sex either

No. 459711

>>459706
I think most people’s experience of monogamy is “I would fuck someone else but I won’t”. People usually can’t help being sexually attracted but they can control whether or not they act on the attraction, ie repeatedly fantasizing about it (cheating lite) and or downright pursuing it. If you’re looking for someone who is “you-sexual” though… rip, Especially if you’re straight lol

No. 459722

>>459711
yeah, it would appear so. that's incredibly pointless though imo. i don't understand a romantic relationship that isn't basically 'open' if you're two people that think or feel that way. if they want to fuck other people anyways, why not just have an open arrangement or be single? idk why people who are desiring of others are in monogamous relationships. it's like dating a dude that wants to fuck anthropomorphic horses to me. like, it'll never happen because they don't exist, and even if he had the self control not to if they did, at the end of the day, the fact that he wants to plow a pink talking pony is upsetting enough.

No. 459728

>>459581
It's anime trash swag, but the image was drawn by Mookie probably because neither Tat or Jenny can draw.

No. 459729

>>459706
Do people actually feel some sort of crazy all encompassing lust for strangers on the daily or something? Like I've been with the same guy for 10 years and while I've obviously been like "wow that person is not/cute" I've never felt my loins desperately burning to fuck them nor have I ever fantasized about it. I'm genuinely not interested in having sex with people who aren't my partner, no matter how hot or cool they are, and I honestly thought most people (barring cheaters and polywhatevers) felt the same way.

No. 459734

>>459729
Anon, I'm the same and worry my bf isn't. It's soul-crushing at times, honestly. The only thing that makes me feel better is knowing he chose me and that maybe he's memed himself into believing some of this, and would be more like me if he were able to chill. Like that he'd just be able to think "that person's cute/hot" but go on with his day, even if it was a friend. Sometimes it seems like he's borderline me-sexual or is at least really attracted to me so maybe it's possible. Sometimes it does sound like it's more like me, but others it sounds like the opposite…
I look at people and think they're attractive and may stare or get butterflies, but it's never enough for me to want to actually fuck them. I don't even think about fucking them. Is that actually normal? I thought people just thought other people were hot and maybe got a little aroused at most looking them over? Usually it's more objective than emotional for me and I don't think about it very much, definitely not enough for it to show up in my fantasies or make me want to be poly.
>>459711
>ie repeatedly fantasizing about it (cheating lite) and or downright pursuing it
Thank god, other people feel upset by this too? I hate knowing my bf would watch porn and look at other girls nudes. He even said that doing the repeated fantasizing doesn't actually make specific fantasies go away, which is what some people claim. I feel like people think I'm crazy for it bothering me. I really don't even let serious fantasies or recurring ones about other people into my head and ones about friends are a total no-no to me. I don't care enough to bother with any of them and I feel like once I'm down that road, I can't turn back, so I've never entertained them because I have a ton of sexual self-control. Bf thought maybe I'm "repressed" but I honest to god don't give enough of a shit and they barely cross my mind, I don't feel like I'm really forcing myself.
I can't control other people and should not, but I have feelings, you know? Sometimes I cry because I wish I was "normal" with my attraction so I wouldn't feel like some sort of Christian role model that doesn't exist and wouldn't feel like a dumbshit for being actually person-sexual.

No. 459736

>>459729
Never. People just let their libido do their thinking and justify their failing the marshmallow test as an adult by acting like sex and lust are magic powers that literally force you to fuck.

No. 459741

>>459219
I don't get why any woman would even WANT to be a pedophile? Being around teen boys in school was enough to pretty much hate that era of malehood and never wanna deal with them again. Plus they'd be pornsick and know jack shit about pleasing you. Adult women already set the bar low for adult men, don't push it into the ground by trying to date a dumb kid.

No. 459748

File: 1567986564330.jpg (44.38 KB, 618x461, n64rainbowroad.jpg_618x0_.jpg)

Mario Kart 64's Rainbow Road is overrated and boring.

No. 459757

>>459748
that song is so catchy though

No. 459759

>>459696
>>459607
Real vanila bean is a masterpiece

No. 459772

>>459225
In the long run, no, starving yourself is not cheaper
https://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/health-consequences

No. 459782

>>459748
>Mario Kart 64 is overrated
FTFY

No. 459814

>>459665
I don't understand this series. It's always "4 levels of ___" but it's only three chefs. shouldn't it be three levels of what ever?

No. 459881

>>459722
Wanting to fuck someone can be fleeting, and it is fleeting most of the time. Everyone is different, I think it's unfair to crucify someone for a thought crime that is literally just lizard-brain driven and is momentary. Again, being attracted to someone is a random thing and not something one decides to do. Also attraction is wanting to fuck someone, unless youre asexual.

Like, if your bf is a retard cumbrain that is obsessing over other women in front of you and jacks off to porn non stop that's obv a problem but you'd be silly to think normal people don't see a random person on the street they think is legitimately fuckable. One can think that for a minute, then move on. It's like thinking about a french fry or something but you don't actually care enough about a french fry to ruin your good diet.


Anyway, my unpopular opinion (in NorCal) is that Burning Man is a retarded drug fest that people exaggerate the vibes of because they're all high as fuck and think they're having spiritual moments. I fucking hate these wannabe boomers.

No. 459886

>>459881
>Also attraction is wanting to fuck someone, unless youre asexual.
no, it definitely is not. you can be attracted to someone but not be sexually attracted to them, or you can be slightly sexually attracted to them, maybe wanting to kiss them at most. there are different ways to be attracted to someone, and feeling "attraction" doesn't mean you want to fuck them.

>but you'd be silly to think normal people don't see a random person on the street they think is legitimately fuckable.

that's weird. i don't think of some random "attractive" guy and imagine fucking him. like literally a thought can go to "that person is cute" and no further. just because someone is attractive doesn't mean you want to fuck them. i think zayn malik is a good looking guy but i have 0 interest in fucking him. you can be attracted based on multiple things, too, and it still not result in a sexual attraction. it's pretty fucking weird that so many of you immediately jump to imagining fucking complete randos

No. 459887

>>459884
I don't actually "jump to imagining fucking complete randos" 24/7, it has happened maybe like 2 times a year at best, and has been fleeting. I will say though, just bc your attraction mounts slowly and you'd want to kiss someone on sight rather than wanna think about fucking them, doesn't mean everyone is that slow on the escalation. I find that people that have had one night stands before have an easier time imagining fucking someone than someone that is less sexually available. There are people who definitely obsess over randos but they're not very common and they're not all your dumbfuck cumbrain boyfriends. Some people have higher sex drives than you which makes them momentarily think about random shit, that is all.

No. 459890

>>459887
>I don't actually "jump to imagining fucking complete randos" 24/7, it has happened maybe like 2 times a year at best, and has been fleeting.
tbh i feel like you're a bit offended bc you know it to be true and it's more than twice a year, and more often when you're in close encounters with people like coworkers and such.

>I will say though, just bc your attraction mounts slowly and you'd want to kiss someone on sight rather than wanna think about fucking them

i literally don't even think about kissing them. that's weird.

>There are people who definitely obsess over randos but they're not very common and they're not all your dumbfuck cumbrain boyfriends.

almost all men do this, lbr, but i see it a lot from women too. it's a pointless relationship. you have a glorified friendship peppered with sex between each other, though ultimately apparently you desire more than each other. i just dont understand why people like this are even in monogamous relationships. i'm just saying, it doesn't make much sense. more people should just have socially monogamous relationships and not sexual then instead of trying to veil their degeneracy just to end up with failed marriages and broken families

No. 459891

>>459889
First of all can you stop deleting and reposting the post over and over? I can see you doing it lol.

I'm not sure why you need me to be exactly the way you assume people to be. I told you how things are for me, I don't have a high libido so I rarely see someone I'd actually wanna fuck. Believe it or not.

Sexuality isn't what makes a relationship, especially if we're talking about a marriage. Exclusivity doesn't mean "no thought crimes". People sometimes think about smacking a friend they love bc the friend is being annoying, people sometimes get the impulse to eat something they shouldn't, one sometimes has the weird urge to jump off when they're near a cliff. These are impulses that people have to varying degrees and sexual attraction is among them.

You sound insecure, fam.

No. 459895

>>459891
>First of all can you stop deleting and reposting the post over and over? I can see you doing it lol.
i made a small correction. that's what you're supposed to do, delete and repost your correction, anon.

>People sometimes think about smacking a friend they love bc the friend is being annoying, people sometimes get the impulse to eat something they shouldn't, one sometimes has the weird urge to jump off when they're near a cliff. These are impulses that people have to varying degrees and sexual attraction is among them.

i think wanting to smack your friend is very different from wanting to have sex with randos or whatever. someone that automatically jumps to the thought of fucking strangers is already someone that is not very discerning, most likely generally, and it's likely they'd act on that if there were no consequences. you can cry "thought crimes" as if not acting on it is all that matters, but i still don't wanna be with a dude that has "fleeting thoughts" about wanting to poop on my chest, even if he never acts on it. it's just the principle. as i said, i just don't see the reason why people who are prone to this type of thing even try to fit into sexual monogamy when it clearly doesn't suit them. i think there are people who sexual monogamy AND social works perfectly for, and this narrative about wanting to have sex with others but denying yourself it makes you a "good spouse" being normalized is just way weird. sexual and social monogamy obviously isn't for them.

No. 459897

>>459890
I feel similar confusion. I never imagine fucking/sexually assaulting strangers without consent, (which a stranger obviously cannot give) but apparently this is normal.

Are people's relationships just them getting turned on by, and imagining fucking other people until they die?

No. 459901

>>459897
>Are people's relationships just them getting turned on by, and imagining fucking other people until they die?
seriously, yes, and then everyone patting themselves on the back for not fucking all the other people they imagine fucking. it's so bizarre to me that people are seeing strangers irl and start to imagine what it'd be like to get fucked by the barista. like, i just don't understand why these people get married? like, fine if you think that way, i don't think this is necessarily inherent to all humans and i think it's really weird that they insist on entering arrangements they are unhappy with, clearly. i see the same insane cognitive dissonance play out over and over again. "well, i'm fine with him wanting to fuck x minor celebrity but if he were to get to know her in person, THEN i'd be jealous". like, he already would fuck her and wants to fuck her? why is that already not offensive? all of these marriages are literally based around "only as good as my options and what my circumstance reasonably allows". they're pointless.

No. 459902


No. 459905

>>459891
>people sometimes think about smacking a friend they love

what?? what the fuck?

i think you're projecting here i have never, ever thought about assaulting my friends holy shit

No. 459909

>>459895
>shit on my chest
You're crazy.

No. 459926

>>459905
>>459905
NTA but honestly ngl it depends on the culture. Pretty much every culture where theres less focus on feelings and being sensitive OR the culture is more passionate and heated is more argumenative and feisty.

No. 459941

>>459909
She was obviously joking there, I lol'd. And you're crazy if you think guys don't think up any manner of absurd things they'd like to do to you while you're naked.

Case in point: the entire porn and fetish industry

No. 459978

Euphoria is cringey as fuck. The characters make me wince because of how absolutely bone chillingly cringe they are. And I don't use that term often.

When Rue is describing each character at the beginning of every episode or doing a monologue it sounds like a teenager's tryhard fanfiction. It's got that quirky "witty" style which normal people just don't sound like.

For example when she was describing the jock dude's relationship with the bitchy Hispanic girl she said something like, "He absolutely despised body hair. And the first thing he noticed about her was that she was practically hairless…" What normal person notices lack of body hair before other things? Why are you trying to make a totally empty and typical character seem interesting with such a stupidly specific and unrealistic description.

Or when the trans girl is sitting in the car with her friend and says something like "no heteronormativity in my area.." or something like that I felt like I needed to gag. Nice buzzword.

Everyone is going on about how "beautiful" the show is visually and it's not. It's too fucking dark for no reason.

People say how beautiful the makeup looks are and they aren't anything fucking special or cool. They aren't "ground breaking." They are literally just makeup looks that have been on Instagram for years before the show even began.

The fact they copy makeup looks from Instagram and casted Instagram stars as the actors (besides Zendaya which tbh is pretty good in this show) just proves the fact that Euphoria is a show for Instagrammers and Twitter stans.

Sorry for sperging a bit here but this has been on my mind for a while and it needed to be said.

No. 459989

>>458831
Oldish post (I'm catching up) but Megan Thee Stallion is pretty much everything I hate in society right now. I actually started off following her on Twitter then unfollowed because I got sick of her bragging about going to college and "giving back to her community". How the fuck is any of this shit empowering? If she just silently went to school it would be different. Her bragging about it constantly makes it seem like some unattainable feat. She's playing into misogyny and is getting praised for it, I'm not sure how people don't see this. Her lyrics are typical "I love dick, money, and I call the shots" bullshit and quite frankly I'm sick of hearing about her.

No. 460037

Wearing high heels is impractical, can cause longterm health risks, and almost on par with wearing tight corsets or foot binding. I would rather wear socks and sandals my whole life than put those medieval torture devices on my feet.

No. 460039

>>460037
good opinion, agreed

No. 460040

>>460037
corsets are less harmful than high heels tbh

No. 460069

>>459978
i started watching it and didn't really get it. the only likable character in the entire show is the protagonist

No. 460071

>>459694
>>459729
I agree with you both. If I'm in a relationship my desire for other people shuts off completely. I might be able to find someone objectively attractive, but without lust and desire, if that makes sense. Like how you can look at a female model and assess that they are indeed attractive, but get nothing from it.

I even stopped looking at porn (I was pretty addicted before) because I think it's disrespectful to look at anyone else period, and I expect my partner to do the same. I am pretty lucky because my boyfriend is similar, he is very devoted and only thinks of me. I'll probably get jumped on a lot as naive for believing that but his actions and demeanor have proved it to me.

>>459734
Nah, I think it's normal for it to bother you. But a lot of people settle for the reality that most partners allow their eyes to wander and don't have a very strong sense of loyalty. It's always played up as something out of their control and sure, maybe the initial thought comes out of nowhere, but once you entertain it and give it attention that's 100% on them. For example if you're fantasizing about someone you are going out of your way to do that and get off on it, it's not innocent behavior. Imagine if someone fantasized about killing someone in their mind. Suddenly it matters even though it's not real, and they didn't actually do it, huh? Imagining cheating on your partner is just as bad as doing it, at least to me.

No. 460074

girls with hair longer than mid-back length are crazy.

No. 460086

>>460074
I had a lurk of that big long hair forum where they post pics of themselves and seriously, they seem so strange tbh. Religious or horse girl types mostly. Also a weird old man who would post his ugly shoulder length grey hair constantly for asspats from girls, creepy af.

No. 460119

>>460086
nta but what exactly is a horse girl type?

No. 460128


No. 460129

>>460074
I didn’t know super long hair was a fetish until I saw a thread on /wsg/ that was entirely women braiding or pulling their hair down

No. 460133

>>460074
Can kind of confirm? I'm a neet with avoident personality disorder and I've had waist length hair several times. I would hide behind it if I had to be in public. I don't like people touching me and I was afraid to go to a hairdresser. My record is 4 years between haircuts.

No. 460142

>>460129
I twigged on when I started getting weird messages on tumblr and realised I'd been reblogged onto some hair fetish blogs. I was just lazy with my look, why did that have to be fetishised?
It's a pain to know that since the tumblr purge only targeted conventional porn it's all still out there.

No. 460181

>>459814
The 4th level is the food scientist

No. 460182

>>460074
I agree it's always a girl who's too lazy to get a hair cut and thinks she's a special snowflake because of it, I think people like that also ignore that not getting a hair cut doesn't let your hair grow out evenly and creates a ton of split ends….

No. 460207

File: 1568108339952.png (1.78 MB, 1198x1192, knj.png)

I think "e-girls" are actually rather cute.

No. 460210

File: 1568109243967.gif (809.82 KB, 498x356, 1562718650197.gif)

Full bush is disgusting. I grew my pubes out due to having a hectic couple months and not having a convienient time to shave, it's been horrible. The scent of all my vaginal fluid and urine gets trapped in them and I can smell it through yoga pants just halfway through the day. I have to thoroughly shampoo them for at least 5 minutes in the shower to get the scent out, but it just gets gross smelling again within a couple hours. I don't understand how anyone prefers having their vag in this awful state.

No. 460211

>>460210
This happens on my armpits. All my body hair is grown out then I shave and repeat.
When that armpit hair gets to be near a quarter inch, it smells faster even with normal deodorant use.

No. 460212

>>460210
This happens on my armpits. All my body hair is grown out then I shave and repeat.
When that armpit hair gets to be near a quarter inch, it smells faster even with normal deodorant use.

No. 460215

>>460210
People have different vag lips/discharge/scent/hair amount. Some women could avoid washing with a full bush for a week without there being an obvious vaginal smell (though I'm sure the rest of the body would smell) and some women can be completely shaven and wash twice a day and have a really strong vaginal smell.

Plus yoga pants aren't the most breathable item of clothing for your vagina.

No. 460222

>>460210
I've had a full bush for the past 5 years and had zero issues. As the other anon said, everyone's fanny is different. The one time I did shave during that 5 year period, I've never felt so disgusting and irritated in my entire life. Different strokes and all that. Go get a nice wax/shave and treat it nice.

No. 460225

>>460210
Having a full bush might not suit you but smelling bad a couple hours after showering isn't exactly the norm. When you say you shampoo your bush are you using specific products for that area cos you could actually be upsetting the natural balance down there and causing a smell that way

I'd see a doc about possible yeast problems if I smelled bad that quickly after washing, pubic hair alone does not cause that

No. 460227

>>459989
Similar to this I'd been watching Doja Cats video for Juicy lately and the comment section is her being praised for her 'body positive message' cos her ass is naturally big instead of surgically created. She's still singing a whole song about asses and showing her ass the whole video. She naturally has a body type that is trendy right now so where's the 'positivity' in that? Her vid is just sexual ass shaking, no different than all the other porny music vids being made

No. 460231

>>460210
female genital area has different pH than the rest of the body, and discharge changes it even further. Most shampoo has strong detergents that are not recommended even for the scalp for the every day use. Anon, if you're shampooing your coochie for 5 mins everyday you're fucking up badly and the smell is your poor vag fighting back lol. Use products intended for genital care, but do some research before so you know they're gentle and without shitty stuff

No. 460242

>>460074
My hair is pretty long and the only reason why I'm not seeing a hairdresser is because I've never met one who isn't absolutely retarded when it comes to wavy or curly hair. Everytime I saw one they would just cut way more than asked and it would look like shit on me. I don't know if I should cut my split ends myself or find a hairdresser just for that but they're so expensive.

No. 460258

>>460231
Yeah it's over washing that causes problems a lot of the time. I recently had a change in discharge and my doc warned me against using flushable wet wipes. Appears they were the cause of my problems despite their gentle/skin-kind claims. Shampoo or shower gel should certainly never go near that area. Your vagina has its own cleaning system so water in the shower is enough to finish the job

No. 460268

>>460210
Nah you just don't know how to take care of yourself. Wearing yoga pants + super tight panties not fully made of cotton, and then shampooing down there is the worst combo. No wonder you smell.

No. 460275

>>460242
it's absolutely worth it to get a curly cut! they fix the whole shape of your hair based on your curl pattern and show you how to style it to bring out the texture. I went a year between curly cuts and learned how to trim curly hair in-between so both times being $100ish wasn't terrible, I've spent more to be disappointed at a high end salon so.

No. 460287

>>460210
Mine doesn't smell because I always wear cotton panties and loose pants/skirts but the hair is so coarse it ends stabbing me and it itches like hell. Trimmed is the way to go.

No. 460372

i like freelee the banana girl

No. 460392

>>460210
I like having pubes, maybe change your diet/wear looser clothes/ stop using much product? I never really had this problem despite having a full bush

if the urine thing bothers you what I usually do is shave my inner thighs and almost to wear my pubic area is, then I shave my butt and labia area but keep a triangle

No. 460431

>>459268
Meant to ask when this came up, but what are other popular accounts in this aesthetic? I want to look at more pretty shit.

No. 460432

>>460392
or you know, some people have bigger thicker bushes. mine is a fucking nightmare.

No. 460433

>>460372
I used to like the videos where she showed what she ate during the day and the ones where she would watch videos and comment on them. I didn't always agree with her but I still liked watching her nonetheless. Honestly I kind of liked some of VeganGain's normal food and vlog videos too. I don't really follow drama surrounding vegans so I'm not 100% sure what's up with them.

No. 460436

Being basic is sometimes alright. No need to shoehorn yourself in some niche. Actually just thought of this a while ago thinking if I had less things to worry about, that would be easier on my head.

No. 460445

>>460436
i think the main issue with being a "basic bitch" isn't the interests, but the actual person behind them. there's nothing wrong with liking starbucks and brunch, but it isn't a personality trait. it's weird in itself to see people who check off so many of the same boxes. a lot of these types of girls tend to be curious about other hobbies, but worried about criticism. if they're not, they're usually pretty vapid, which again, is the problem.

No. 460449

>>460445
>but it isn't a personality trait

Liking obscure bands and getting into obscure hobbies just to pretend you are ~not like other girls~ isn't either. Some girls would do all sorts of posturings just not to be called a basic bitch, and caring so much about those labels is insanely shallow and narcissistic.

No. 460454

>>460449
A shit ton of people on this site are into the same 5 things as well. I feel like the “geeky weeb girl” is the new basic bitch/actually more prolific. I haven’t even met a Disney obsessed girl in real life but I’ve met plenty of the other type

No. 460499

>>460449
>>460454
i wasn't implying that was either though, my point is vapid people tend to all like the same 5 or 6 things.

No. 460513

>>460432
True, but shampooing your vag is still a recipe for a yeast infection. Doing all that probably made the problem of the smell 10x worse when trimming and regulary rinsing it with warm water would have been sufficient.

No. 460561

>>460433
They hate babies

No. 460603

SOS was Rihanna's last good single

No. 460640

>>460210
I'm the same when it comes to my vag. I'm an extremely hairy woman so my pubes grow really long and thick and I'm also somewhat hormonal so my sweat tends to smell. I didn't shave for one month and I do use products designed for cleaning my private area that are PH balanced and only wear cotton panties that are washed separately from the other clothing at a higher temperature and wear overall breathable clothing. I just couldn't do it because it was extremely uncomfortable for me. The smell down there wasn't that bad but it was definitely worse than when I don't have hair down there and the worst part was the itchiness, my pubes made me really fucking itchy even if I trimmed them.

Now I only shave my vag and my armpits because having hair there makes my life harder but I don't shave any other parts of my body because it's unnecessary.

No. 460663

>>460640
Nta but similarly I'd love to just leave all my body hair alone as it doesn't bother me looks wise and I'm not concerned with others judging. But deodorant does go on better after shaving and pubic hair gets too itchy. I leave my legs alone though

No. 460718

>>460561
Lmao, this never fails to make me laugh.

No. 460899

>>458822
People who collect/obsess over makeup/have 10 different eyeshadow palettes,foundations,mascaras, are straight up weird to me. There's no reason to have THAT much makeup. As someone who wears makeup every day and enjoys it, I really can't fathom why there are so many makeup brands as they are all literally selling the same shit under a different name. I actually can't believe they're all still not bankrupt. Anyways, people like Tati honestly just piss me off with how much makeup they have.

No. 460913

>>460899
People are smalltime hoarders. Insta and youtube are full of different collector communities where people are spending small fortunes on collections where I don't know if there's enough joy coming from it or whether it reaches a point of just obsession to complete sets

I don't do make up but I own a few toys and browse those tags on Insta, people get such a buzz from buying that moderation goes out the window

No. 460933

File: 1568228886307.png (274.37 KB, 680x371, EEH1qicUcAYZD0V.png)

The new iphone is ugly. Makes me sad because iphones used to be the prettiest phone, but now this bitch ugly and expensive.

No. 460934

File: 1568228999388.jpg (607.45 KB, 1080x3240, ZomboDroid 11092019120859.jpg)

I get the concept, I do. I've had the idea to combine hardware with jewelry myself. But some of these designs are retarded and awkward.

No. 460936

>>458994
I love unemployed by Tierra Whack so fm

No. 460937

>>458992
I really like Chynna (so fucking underrated) and Princess Nokia.

No. 460939

>>459135
the things that happen to all sorts of different animals in laboratories is horrific. blindness is the least of it (they actually use rabbits to test products in their eyes as rabbit's have no tear ducts and can't 'expel' the product). in some places where they test on monkeys they will operate on the monkeys to remove their vocals chords before they start the testing so they can't make noise as they try to scream.

seriously, please choose cruelty free products where possible. there are a barbaric things going on in these labs simply for product testing on items like makeup. even if you live in places like the eu where testings is banned, you could still be giving your money to companies who test in china.

sorry for the longwinded reply, this is just something that hurts my soul. those poor bbs

No. 460940

>>459454
glad I didn't bother to see it

No. 460942

>>460119
I'm worried I look like a horse girl honestly

No. 460943

>>460211
I find this too with my pit hair

No. 460949

>>460275
>they fix the whole shape of your hair based on your curl pattern and show you how to style it to bring out the texture
That's exactly what I want too. But so far I've never really found any hairdresser who was able to do that. Typically for the few times I asked to get my hair cut I'd say I never straighten my hair because mine is fragile and I have dermatitis on my scalp. So I want to cut my hair to whatever length, and once it's over the hairdresser will almost always cut it way shorter than asked because they always miscalculate the different lengths between straight wet hair and my naturally curly hair. And then they almost always say "now all you have to do is to straighten your hair!" despite everything I tell them at the beginning.

I've seen a few videos about girls with 2c and 3a curls getting new haircuts recently, I'll definitely use them as references to ask what I want precisely next time.

No. 461066

>>458822
People who stan jeffree star honest to god need professional help. He's a fucking psychopath in his 30's who makes a living off of putting himself in other people's drama and "canceling" companies. He went fucking burzurk during that James Charles thing and was literally getting off to the fact that people were talking about him and praising him for being against James's " predatory behavior", despite the fact his character was built off of predatory behavior. All he had to do was say sorry (even though he did it because he realized he had shit to share). Holy crap he's insane.

No. 461071

It's so fucking dumb when people call their SO their "wife/husband" when they're not actually married. It doesn't matter if you see yourselves as ~basically married~ because you live together and have a cat or whatever, if you're not legally married you are not fucking married. Calling them your husband/wife is just factually wrong and needlessly confuses people. Just call them your "partner" since that's actually what they are. If you want to call yourself ~married~ so bad then GET FUCKING MARRIED.

Just to clarify, this rant doesn't apply to gay couples who aren't allowed to legally get married where they live. That's very different than people who can easily get married, but don't bother yet still insist on saying they are.

No. 461072

>>461066
The James Charles thing really sealed the deal for me that he hasn't changed at all and is still a despicable person prone to aggression and threatening others. Also as you pointed out extremely hypocritical because he is always being inappropriate and/or encouraging others like Shane in being inappropriate about Nate yet he tried to "cancel" James over the same kind of alleged behavior.

No. 461077

>>461071
>doesn't apply to gay couples who aren't allowed to legally get married where they live

So definitions apply except to where you think they don't? Who are you to assume someone doesn't have a good reason to not marry on paper.
Marriage can be a shit deal for a lot of people, it doesn't mean they love their spouses less.

No. 461081

>>460210
weird my skin always got really sensitive and started to hurt if i shaved all my hair off. i have rather light pubic hair though so letting it be is not that big deal for me

No. 461082

i side-eye dog people so hard because they, at heart, believe they are owed attention or affection from animals, even if they don't literally say it. that's what they think. i think they should be avoided completely. they place dog-human relationships on a pedestal and this really says a lot about them, if you think about it.

this is not a criticism of dogs. dog people who are "meh" to cats or most other animals that have a healthy and necessary sense of self preservation or caution are unwitting attention whores or narcs that think they deserve an animal's affection or attention. if you ever listen to them talk, they always say how "loving" human-dog friendships are like, transcendental in their pureness, you realize that they actually prefer relationships that are centered around another person or being living for them, to value only them, at their own potential detriment. they'll never say this outright, though, obviously, because no one wants to be thought of as an attention whore or narc, but they'll get overly offended the minute you suggest that this speaks volumes about them. it's something you have to listen for.

No. 461083

>>461071
An unsettling amount of people have the mindset "if you're not married, you're single" so sometimes its just a way of caution and not a "we're soooo in love" thing. If someone lies on legal documents about it though they're completely dumb, lol. But I'd just keep the former in mind, the person might've been harassed in the past.

No. 461086

>>461082
i'm genuinely a bit confused by this one, anon. is it that you dislike people with dogs in general or just the really hardcore "my dogs are my babies :))) that's why i have to bring them everywhere with me" type people?

No. 461095

>>461086
not people who own dogs, i think you can own a dog but be unsettled by the fact that they are really, really psychologically unhealthy animals (partially bc of breeding and also conditioning) my problem is the fact that 98% of dog people or dog owners talk these traits about them up as if they're ideal and pure. they're AWFUL traits. i love animals and i wouldn't expect a thing from them and i'm horrified to see animals forgoing their self preservation and healthy skepticism to obsess over people at the risk to their own safety. we reward dogs for this. it shouldn't be rewarded. imagine wanting your child to have the traits dogs have and see their parents the way dogs see their parents/owners. that'd be awful. dogs deserve respect but dog people fundamentally have no respect for them, or else they would see that this is not right. no animal, no child, no person, should be praised and conditioned to be the way dogs are. it's horrible. even dogs that aren't abused have a 'battered wife' mentality and that's what people literally love about them. that's literally the reason why people love dogs over other animals and claim they're special for. it's awful. and the only way someone can be proud or not terrified to see that, is if they're a lowkey narc or just a massive attention whore. anyone that prefers dogs over like, almost any other animal is a lowkey crazy

No. 461097

>>461082
Agreed. I work at a vet and I see this shit constantly. People really do think all dogs owe them affection, and when they approach a strangers dog I the waiting room who is sick or totally disinterested in them they get super offended and say shit like "what's wrong with your dog? MY dog LOVES people!!" Note that these types of people's complaints about other pets is ALWAYS "they don't even love u lol." Like they need a random animal validating their feelings every second of every day or it's worthless.

Also crazy cat ladies get a lot of flak but crazy dog people are 100 times worse. They are a literal nightmare to work with and my job has made me despise them. (Responsible sane owners are fine, of course.)

No. 461098

>>461077
>So definitions apply except to where you think they don't?
I never said it changes the fact they're by definition not married. I said that my rant doesn't apply because it doesn't bother me when people in that circumstance say they're married, since it's not their fault they can't do it legally due to discrimination.

>Who are you to assume someone doesn't have a good reason to not marry on paper. Marriage can be a shit deal for a lot of people, it doesn't mean they love their spouses less.

lolwut. Where do I say couples love each other less if they're not married? You're projecting. If you don't want to get married, that's fine, but marraige is a legal commitment and if you're not willing to make it, then why say you are married? It's stupid. It is factually inaccurate and something you're CHOOSING not to do. The word "partner" exists to describe people in serious relationships that aren't married, why not call your SO the thing that's actually true? Save the legal label for people who actually make the legal commitment. This logic shouldn't be hard to understand.

No. 461100

>>461077
NTA but I'm curious what a good reason to not marry your partner who you already pretend you're married to is. I have nothing against couples who don't want to marry for whatever reason, but if you're already pretending they're your spouse then you might as well bite the bullet.

No. 461102

>>460899
I think people will look back on those youtube videos of huge makeup collections stored in those ikea drawers and cringe instead of thinking it's cool like now. Past a certain point it's just pure consumerism. I understand some people enjoy collecting stuff but so much of that is going to go unused and eventually expire.

No. 461104

>>461100
It's usually that they want the "maturity" points without having to make the commitment. I hate being dismissive like that, but that's really what it boils down to most of the time.

No. 461107

>>461097
exactly, and i agree about "crazy dog people", a lot of people will concede that they're insane narcs, but what i'm getting at is that this is actually almost all dog owners/dog preferrers, save for maybe those that found a dog they rescued or just don't want to see them abused. 99.99999999999% of dog owners or those that "like dogs better" idealize the traits in dogs that end up getting them abused. they're narcs or attention whores. i'll take in stray dogs i've come across because obviously they need to be saved, but i think they are psychologically unhealthy animals in comparison to most others and it wouldn't ever occur to me to think that dog-human relationship dynamics are at all "ideal" or "pure" or that dogs are special and "better" than other animals for being battered wives.

people that "prefer dogs" better - not just crazy dog people - are people that idealize animals or people with a battered wife mentality, so long as they're the object of affection for that person or animal. they think "well, i'm not betraying this animal's trust or obsession by abusing them physically or verbally, so this level of worship is deserved and pure and righteous", and that's very wrong. if you're anything but horrified by the way dogs see and treat people, you don't love dogs, you're just a narc, imo

No. 461108

>>461107
What the fuck? Dogs are my favorite animal so I’m an abusive narc now? You sound crazy. I don’t even own pets and I don’t hate cats or other animals, I just think dogs are cuter.

No. 461112

>>461108

don't look into the dog hate thread kek

No. 461113

>>461108
>Dogs are my favorite animal so I’m an abusive narc now? You sound crazy. I don’t even own pets and I don’t hate cats or other animals, I just think dogs are cuter
overly offended, very typical. it's kind of dumb to have a favorite animal just because they're "cuter". you can just say "i think dogs are cuter", you have no real basis for them to be your favorite then, which is almost as lame as dog people that love animals for having unhealthy mentalities. i think weasels are probably the cutest animals but they aren't my favorite animals. anyways, reach harder in trying to get offended by 1 person's opinion, but approach most people who prefer dogs and they'll say "they're special, they're better because -insert people worship, obsession, no sense of self preservation, essentially-". most don't say they prefer them over other animals for their appearance

No. 461116

>>461112
That thread really highlights how deeply unhinged many on this site are.

No. 461117

>>461116
How? A lot of people in that thread admit they've been bitten by dogs or dislike dog owners for not training their dogs and they just don't want to be around them. Why do dogfags have such a problem with valid criticisms, accountability and reality?

No. 461118

>>461113
NTA. Maybe I am a shit owner because none of my dogs have ever acted like battered wives and in my eyes they are independent creatures who at any moment think God knows what. They are like toddlers in the sense that they will do whatever the fuck they want and it's your job to keep them safe.
I love dogs cause we can sort of communicate with them, but they are also mysterious creatures who look at a world in a different way than us humans do.

No. 461119

>>461117
>convieniently leaving out how many posters wish death and violence upon dogs who haven't hurt anyone

No. 461121

>>461119
i don't see it in that thread though?

No. 461123

>>461119

i think you may be confusing it with Vermin girl telling everyone how she would poison cats to protect her precious pidgeons.

No. 461124

>>461104
>>461114
Yeah I agree. If you're serious about your partner why not just go do a quick courthouse affair? It doesn't have to be a huge affair, and you get a lot of benefits from marriage as well (depending on where you live). The couples that have been together for decades and even have kids without tying the knot confuse the fuck out of me. Just seems like a waste but whatever.

No. 461128

>>461082
>>461097
>>461107
>>461113
>>461117
>>461126
>dog hate thread leaking
Lock when?

No. 461129

>>461118
>>461118
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/6qrjxj/dog_lovers_of_reddit_why_do_you_love_dogs_and_why/

https://viagenpets.com/top-ten-reasons-we-love-dogs/

https://www.petmd.com/dog/pet_lover/WW_top5_reasons_we_love_dogs

https://www.buzzfeed.com/kaelintully/youre-the-best-friend-that-i-ever-had

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2007/01/the-real-reason-we-love-dogs.html

>literally every article online (and feel free to find more) centers around how all of the traits that are unhealthy and dangerous for dogs, are their most valuable qualities


if you can't see that that's not right, you don't love dogs, just admit it.

why are you people so offended to be viewed with skepticism by anyone? why do you think you're owed that people should trust your motivations or your character, when they don't even know you? the onus is on the person to prove that they are decent, to animals, to children, to people, etc. it is not healthy for everyone to assume everyone is necessarily good, but dog people get offended when they aren't granted immediately "good person" status. i know you guys really want to reach hard to be offended by an admittedly unpopular opinion, be honest with yourselves and others and stop lying about why most people prefer dogs. if you yourself want to try to claim you're "not like other dog owners", fine, but admit that how most people view dogs agrees with my opinion: they are unconditionally loving to their own detriment, will sacrifice their safety in exchange for being treated with even less than basic dignity, etc. you can claim you don't see dogs this way, but most "dog lovers" admit they see them this way, they just frame it positively.


>>461119
>many
out of 1094 posts, literally there are like, 3 that say anything similar, and i don't think those are acceptable. if you refuse to admit that people typically say godawful things with much, much higher frequency about other animals or consider animals that don't act like dogs to be deserving of death or harm, you're lying. maybe sort out how dog people speak about other animals before you try coming for people that have come across countless dog owners and side-eye them for good reason.

>>461128
this is about people that prefer dogs, not even dog owners or dogs. dogs are fine and should be respected.

No. 461133

>>461129
You do realize the human-dog relationship is glamorized by media to be wonderful and amazing and has been shoved down everyone's throats since childhood? Just because people like dogs and think a human dog relationship is a fun happy thing doesn't make them abusive.

No. 461137

>>461129
>>461133
>>461133
Samefag, but I hope you're just as critical of cat owners who talk about how their cats are just as loving and affectionate as dogs are.

You'd get your point across much better if you simply stated why human-dog relationship are unhealthy for dogs (and you had me when you were explaining why) and ways to mitigate that, rather than saying shit like everyone who calls dogs their favorite is a narc

No. 461138

>>461100
In the US
>tax burden isn't increased because the federal government won't assume I have more access to money just because I have a significant other
>won't have to worry about my partner fucking up my credit or saddling me with mutual debt, our affairs are our own unless we share it
>if we ever decide we don't want to continue the relationship divorce is really expensive

No. 461142

File: 1568250293505.jpg (72.86 KB, 640x459, catss.jpg)

cats rule, dogs drool

No. 461144

>>461133
>Just because people like dogs and think a human dog relationship is a fun happy thing doesn't make them abusive.
i never called them abusive. i said they're almost always attention whores or narcs. keywords: "almost always", "attention whores", "or narcs". it's actually you guys that claimed i called them abusive, because surprise, surprise, "dog people" are dramatic and overly offended (as i said) when anyone, people or animals, is suspicious of them. you are not owed immediate trust by animals or people. it's not a crime for people or animals to be suspicious of you. people with healthy boundaries don't get overly offended when people or animals are suspicious or cautious of others.

>>461137
>and ways to mitigate that
the purpose of my op and subsequent posts weren't to get into ways of mitigating that, that's really for another thread. this was my unpopular opinion, which is that certain 'small things', specifically that dog preferrers prefer them because they're often obsessed in a way that no other animal generally is, something that seems innocuous to most, really isn't. every post in response is a refusal by dog fans to admit that what i mentioned really is the case for most dog fans, or even a sizeable chunk of them, and own their shit as a community, and admit it's really weird and wrong. i'd have more respect for them if they did.

i s2g this is troonery or tra levels of entitlement

>immediately very upset when anyone suspects them of anything

>refusal to condemn toxicity in a community and quash that toxicity for the sake of animals, all because they're personally offended by the implication that they could be thought of negatively
>projection about other animal lovers and denial about how abusive and cruel dog fans are to other animals and general dog fan rhetoric toward other animals specifically because other animals aren't fanatically obsessed with their owners/parents

No. 461146

Anyways I enjoy monster energy drinks.

No. 461148

>>461146
me too! ultra sunrise is my fav, I like that it doesn't feel like my teeth are melting while drinking it

No. 461149

>>461138
>tax burden isn't increased because the federal government won't assume I have more access to money just because I have a significant other
You get tax benefits from being married and filing jointly, though, especially if one spouse makes substantially less money than the other. But if you both make good money then yeah, you will get taxed more, naturally.

>won't have to worry about my partner fucking up my credit or saddling me with mutual debt, our affairs are our own unless we share it

Spouses aren't typically responsible for the debt of the other unless they co-signed for it. Also, don't marry a deadbeat. If you don't realize your partner is garbage with money before marriage then you fucked up. (See every stupid r/relationships post where people are like "just found out my fiancee has 100k in debt, our wedding is in 4 hours, am i overreacting?")

>if we ever decide we don't want to continue the relationship divorce is really expensive

If you're already planning ahead for divorce, why even pretend to be married in the first place? Again, the disdain isn't aimed towards couples who decide to avoid marriage, but people who pretend they are married anyway. Gets real awkward when you're "divorcing" your "husband" every few years. Just call them a partner or boyfriend and go.

No. 461166

>>461149
I think it's fine to cautionary assume most men are financially deadbeat, and have a healthy fear of divorce since it's so common.

I'm fine with vow ceremonies, and rings, I just don't understand why someone would let a piece of paper dictate what they decide to call their spouse. If your guy performs like a husband, then he's a husband as far as anyone else is concerned.

No. 461168

>>461166
Plus common law marriage is a thing.. if you live with your partner, call them your husband/wife, and it’s generally accepted by friends/family.. you’re technically married.

No. 461169

>>461168
Common law marriage is still subject to the same norms as legal marriage to be recognized - such as filing joint tax returns and joint accounts/credit cards, and you still have to have your relationship legally dissolved if you break up. So other than saving money on a ceremony or marriage license, you're still going to wind up being responsible for everything you would be in a legal marriage. A deadbeat common law partner can still fuck you over and you could still even wind up owing spousal support in the event of a breakup. Avoiding a "real" marriage just to wind up in a common law marriage doesn't get you any of the technically single benefits. That said, in the US, common law marriage is recognized by less than 10 states so it's not a factor for most people anyway.

It's not about the ceremony or a piece of paper, it's about intention. LARPing as a married couple when you have no intention to be married or even stay with them is just couples pretending they have it together and getting "maturity points" like another anon said. If you've been living with your partner for a decade and have kids and bought a house together, whatever, sure. If you've been dating for like 2 years and don't even live together and still call him hubby, you're retarded.

No. 461186

File: 1568264024979.jpg (23.43 KB, 500x375, kitty and shiba.jpg)

>>461082
I like cats and dogs (just not those yippy annoying small ones and pitbull type dogs) but I hate dog owners who think cats should be outlawed or that cats are satan, it's a fucking cat Jim, what the fuck did it do to you? I guess maybe a part of it is bitterness now due to cats being the second most popular pet after goldfish.

No. 461207

>>461186
I don't even get why there's always been this autistic dogs vs cats cold war anyway. Preferring one over the other is forbidden, I guess.

No. 461208

>>461186
I love both, am a dog owner. The only problem I really ever have with cat owners is when they have one that kills a ton of small animals and then don't take action to try to stop them. I know it's their instinct, but having to watch birds dying or having them leave dead birds places over and over is too much, especially when cats can actually pose a threat to songbirds and wildlife in an area if they're not controlled. I understand a lot better why some people go as far as saying they should be kept indoors since seeing this. Where I live there's also a serious risk of local wildlife killing your cat instead of the other way around, so people might be more proactive about outdoor time safety.
I still love seeing the neighborhood cats outside regardless since I don't have one. I don't get why you have to just like one or the other.

No. 461222

I think there should be mandatory educational classes before you are allowed to own an animal.

No. 461227

>>461168
>>461169
Common law marraige is actually not a thing anymore for the most part, at least in the US and UK. The UK doesn't have it at all and the US only has it in a handful of states. 10 plus another 5 if common law marraige applied to you before they did away with it in the 90's. Also New Hampshire, but the only right you get is inheritence, so I don't feel lile that really counts.

https://www.unmarried.org/common-law-marriage-fact-sheet/

No. 461293

>>461166
>I just don't understand why someone would let a piece of paper dictate what they decide to call their spouse
Because that "piece of paper" is the difference between a partner and a husband by definition. If it's just a "piece of paper" to them then why is the lable of "marraige" so important?

No. 461329

>>461293
Except for gay people, said anon.
Either there's exceptions to definitions or there's not.
Anon implied that if gay people can't get the piece of paper then their union is implied through their romantic partnership and commitment.
There's no romantic difference between a couple that's been together for a long time, or had a ceremony without signing the piece of paper.

Besides, original anon reneged and said she was referring to annoying couples that call each other hubby/wifey, the same lot of immature people throwing 'monthaversaries' for themselves to celebrate a relationship that hasn't even made it a year.

No. 461356

>>461329
>Either there's exceptions to definitions or there's not.
Anon implied that if gay people can't get the piece of paper then their union is implied through their romantic partnership and commitment.
But that's completely different because in that instance you have a couple who is committed enough to get married, but not legally allowed. As opposed to a couple that can get married but won't. It's unfair to gay people who live in countries with marraige inequality to equalize the two circumstances.

No. 461422

>>461356
Lack of piece of paper is lack of piece of paper, according to your definition. And as mentioned earlier, it's not like people never have personal interests to not get married on paper. Not really yours to decide, hence why it's definitely unpopular for its inherent dickishness.

No. 461442

>>461422
>And as mentioned earlier, it's not like people never have personal interests to not get married on paper.
As previoisly stated, if people don't want to get married that's perfectly fine, but they're still not married and it's a choice they're making. You might see acknowledging reality as "dickish" for some reason, but that doesn't make it any less real.

Why are you so defensive about people finding it annoying when people refusing to get married say they are? Especially when you just see it as ~a piece of paper~? If that's all it is, then why is the legal label so important? It makes no sense.

No. 461533

Very unpopular opinion for here but I have no problem with most transgirls, I don't want to make their lives worse than they already probably are and I feel bad for them since they have to live with a mental illness that effects their lives everyday. I hate transmen though since they're a bunch of self hating women who bitch about other women enjoying themselves, doesn't help that dysphoria is more uncommon in women so it just makes it all the more obvious they're faking it for attention.(pink-pill OT)

No. 461539

>>461533
I nearly went ftm a few years ago and tbh I was full of trauma and trying to get away from sexism. That mixed with a repressed attraction to women. I've heard other detrans women describe the same reasons but then I see some that go on to transition will end up joining in with mens culture of misogyny and it's gross when you see it. It'll be interesting in the next few years to see if detransition figures ever become a real thing on paper cos I can sense an increase coming

I fully noped out of continuing hormones when for the second time I was in the middle of two men talking about how 12 year old girls should be legal.. put me back with the women please

No. 461541

>>461442
>and it's a choice they're making
There's tons of factors that could be heavily influencing them to not make that choice. It's valid.
Why don't gay people just uproot their lives and move to countries where gay marriage is legal and why do they choose to continue to live in oppressive countries? There, see, everything can be boiled down to making a "choice" when you decide you know every single factor at play and assume people are not going far enough to commit out of sheer stubbornness.

I fail to see how anyone calling a partner their husband or wife without the paper would get you bothered. Unless they're an obnoxious couple airing it in the first place you sound like a busybody to even care.

No. 461543

>>461539
Usually that seems to be the reason for that, it's the reason why a lot of girls pretending to be trans still wear skirts and like very feminine things like sanrio characters. I'm pretty sure it's a phase for most of them but it's really shitty to see them putting down women who are content with their gender and don't feel the need to pretend to be a different one as an attempt for men to accept them.

Good to hear that you never went off the deep end though anon granted cringy teenage phases are a thing everyone goes through, I'd say I was probably worse since I was an anti feminist twat.

No. 461546

>>458831
Reminds me of this video where the girl at the beginning claims that their mansion is by women for women but meanwhile they have men whipping them and they're giving lap dances to them later on, there's literally nothing enpowering about being slutty no matter what fun beach party or cute house you put on top of it to mask it.(pink-pill OT)

No. 461547

>>461543
Yeah for some it's just a way of distancing yourself from a past sexual assault, then once you start to pass you are included in mens chats and you realise that even the most normal seeming guys come out with pedo shit when women aren't in the convo

You won't ever find a whole group of women talking about how fucking 12 year olds should be normal, in my college I met two groups of guys saying this and waiting for me to nod along

No. 461548

>>461546
That corset sure looks comfortable

No. 461560

>>461533
I don't really understand. Transmen are usually that way because they were sexually assaulted, looked down on for being a women, etc. Essentially they were made to feel worthless bc they were female. With transwomen on the other hand, majority do it because they were brainwashed by porn or they have it stuck in their head that being female = easy sex = easy life.

No. 461578

>>461560
Yeah and transwomen insult and hate on women all the time

No. 461597

>>461560
I kinda get it. It's cringey to hear misogynistic shit coming from women. also because women like that never fucking shut up about it. it's like listening to mgtows.

No. 461625

>>461597
>>461578
Transwomen are more misogynist imo, their fetishes implying that femininity means slutty and submissive and thoughtless. They think women are a caricature.

No. 461663

thread pic makes me want pancakes tho

No. 461669

File: 1568331184710.jpeg (315.42 KB, 1478x1109, 6f7289706e78de54.jpeg)

>>458831
No, I feel the same way as you. It's hard to find a single mainstream woman who hasn't objectified herself in at least one song. If it's relevant to the lyrics and message, and it isn't overt, I can take some sexuality in a song or video, but this is so blatant and plastic it's disgusting. How do people get off to this? The only pornographic content I like is slow, erotic, and usually still fully clothed. Naked ass in my face does nothing; it's actually repulsive. Now that I'm a radfem, I avoid anything "erotic" in general. I'm sick of being reduced to being a sellable product. My body is not a commodity, and it sure as hell isn't empowering. And, this is overlooking the song content entirely. There's no real melody, and lyrics are the same repeated drivel of sex, drugs, money, and being "bad" in general. Bleh.

>>461546
She talks like she's in a cult. She has the Utah LDS stare.

No. 461681

>>461533
TiFs get totally fucked in the head by T and start mimicking men's violence against women. "Misogyny is super gender affirming!!"
On the other hand though, TiMs are sexist before and after cutting their dicks off.

No. 461683

>>461533
Most of them aren't even "truscum" (mental illness) just a lot of 30yo porn addicted men what the fuck anon, but yeah let's hate some 19yo annoying girls with internalized misogyny who totally did all this for a trend like women always do right?.
>>461681
Agreed. I'm not saying TIF arent insufferable and disrespectful but saying you prefer transwomen over them? Tif's couldn't get to their insanity level no matter how many T shots they take, they're scary.

No. 461689

File: 1568335475456.png (252.07 KB, 960x444, transs.png)

>>461533

I hardly have a problem with any particular group, there no context in which i will approach someone who is minding their own business and harass or question them , even less insult them or anything remotely like that but i don't appreciate the policing and the newspeak and all the made up rules that are now being enforced not only on female spaces but society in general. Its stepping over several lines and sensible people are being made to walk on eggshells and take abuse to cater to one specific group or other.

I guess i have a similar opinion with other topics that are now being de platformed or considered to racy or politically incorrect,. If some people just don't like others for whatever reason leave them fucking be with their opinion , you are allowed to challenge and dissent, if if weren't such a push and so much silencing and discrimination of opposition voices then maybe it wouldn't get so heated and antagonizing and some people would not feel the need to radicalize. This are very dangerous tools for politicians and political factions, pretty much anyone accused of "bigotry" for dissenting is thrown to the wolves and canceled even when they are bringing valid and important issues to the table. Its happening with these feminists who feel trampled by the trans agenda and are not being listened but is not exclusive to them.

No. 461702

Makeup really isn't an art because everyone strives to look the same. I.e every single MUA on Instagram

Lip injections never looks good on people and makes them look like a human duck.

No. 461705

>>461702
depends anon, some thots claim they use makeup as self expression/art while only using it to cover up flaws and conform to beauty standards, there are yt artists I like who use makeup artistically though. I just wish people were honest

No. 461712

>>461683
It literally is a trend though anon what are you talking about? Besides I can’t think of something more sexist than a woman pretending to be a man and hating on other women for not doing the same while going on about how petty they are. It’s literally just an evolution of the ‘I’m not like other girls’ shit.

No. 461722

File: 1568345386425.jpeg (499.75 KB, 1536x1534, 6B8C2582-DBF3-4DD7-B2FB-084DB0…)

>>461702
True. Only one of these can be considered ~art~. The rest are still performative conformity, regardless of how talented the artist is. I wish the “makeup community” would shut the fuck up about how empowering corporate shilling is and realize that not all makeup is equal.

No. 461724

>>461702
>>461705
>>461722
Likewise I feel like makeup could have been art, but in reality everyone just uses it to hide their flaws and insecurities. It's sad bc some people are quite talented but they use it for all the wrong reasons.

No. 461725

>>461722

Being shitty at something just to non conform seems pretty lazy excuse to me and has the depth of a puddle. Any angsty 14 yr old can do that.

No. 461736

>>461533
>men who hate women, are addicted to porn and cry "muh mental illness" are okay, but women who hate themselves and want to escape female gender roles are the true demons and fakers
Nah, anon. Both groups are heavy in misogyny, which makes me dislike them, but the things MtFs say about women while trying to emulate us at the same time and play the perpetual victim (even though many of them are actually violent or outright rapists) earn them a special place on my shitlist. Doesn't help that I've seen several transbians bitch that lesbians are evil for not wanting their "girldicks", while I've only seen maybe two FtMs try that with gay men.
FtMs are often annoying, eyeroll-worthy cows who bend over backwards for male validation, but they're pretty much just tomboyish, mentally ill handmaidens to me. MtFs are an actual threat, as many are just incels with trap fetishes (among others, like diaper shit) and bi/gay men with anger issues.

No. 461741

>>461736
That's fair. I think I'm more talking about actual trans people with mental illnesses as opposed to the fetishy Bruce Jenner types but I get your point. Most MTF trannies I know are just self hating though.

No. 461758

everyone on imageboards is some kind of social reject: the more outwardly normal you seem, the more awful your hidden problem.

No. 461759

>>461736
>Nah
It seems like people who say 'nah' tend to be some version of redpillers who want to tell you what jews are like.

No. 461764

>>461759
Are you ESL or just retarded…

No. 461784

Take GC talk to pink-pill. Derailment bans have been issued, and read the sticky.

No. 461796

>>461759

Or it could just be their local usage of the word 'no'. 'Nah' and 'Nay' are genuinely used where I live and I'm almost entirely certain the vast majority of the elderly country bumpkin folk where I live aren't red pilled.

No. 461838

>>461702
This and the new make up culture aka skincare is mostly bullshit too. Of course you need to wash your face and moisturizing is good but spending hundreds of dollars on these products is stupid and it's even stupider to act as if all the millions of different products are essential when you could focus more on taking care of what you eat and exercising and not frying yourself up in the sun.

No. 461841

>>461838
Agree. Things like the 10 step Korean skincare routine are scams. Save your money.

No. 461844

>>461838
I can’t help but wonder if all of this extensive skincare stuff wouldn’t be deemed necessary if they didn’t wear makeup, or at least not so much, surely that must damage your skin to some extent?

I’ve never worn makeup and I don’t seem to have of the issues that I often see complained about skin wise, but I also don’t use any sort of skincare supplies so perhaps it’s more so a case of me not fucking up the natural balance of the oils? Kinda like how you shouldn’t wash your hair everyday or it’ll throw off it’s balance and make it a grease factory with split ends

No. 461845

>>461844
I don't use make up either in my every day life, I only wear it to parties and even then I sometimes only put eye make up and do my brows and leave the rest of my face alone even though my skin might not be perfect that day, it just feels better than messing up with my face and then have to worry about it

No. 461847

>>461759
…what?

No. 461863

Dairy is good for you in moderation, sugar and carbs aren't the devil

My figure has never been better once you learn to moderate not give up

No. 461872

I kinda miss leafy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

No. 461878

Lesbians in the work place can be just as bad as men. I quit my last job because my managers thirst for women was overbearing. I should have reported her behavior but our GM was a lesbian as well and they were up each other's asses.

Just because we both have vaginas doesn't mean I feel less uncomfortable about your obsession with pussy. She constantly talked about it and had to remind us how gay she was, and I really wish I had the balls to tell her nobody cares. It wouldn't have even bothered me so much if she were just a regular employee, but you're supposed to be my fucking boss, be professional and keep that shit to yourself.

No. 461879

>>461878
Why wont you post this bait on pp that's where your audience is

No. 461880

>>461844
I don’t wear make up either, but have bad skin nonetheless. My skincare routine is so simple though. Wash, apply my prescription cream, moisturize. I feel like doing anything more might be pushing it.

No. 461886

>>461880
how bad is your skin and what is the root of it? I had acne but the sad part is other than that my skin was bright, smooth, wrinkle free with rosie cheeks. Turns out I just had hormone problems and ended up getting hormone treatments to regulate them. the only thing I really have to worry about is those red marks after pimples go away

masks and oils can help ofc but shouldn't be a daily thing

No. 461887

>>461863
Agree, people forget that you have to eat and drink things in MODERATION.

No. 461897

>>461887
This

Skinny people who say that they don't put on any weight even though they eat tons of unhealthy food just exaggerate how much unhealthy stuff they're eating

No. 461900

>>461886
I really don’t know actually! I’ve never been able to afford to get it figured out. I’ve been on accutane even and my acne still persisted lmao. I stopped drinking completely recently and the severity of my zits has gone down, but I still get them (even with my prescription cream). I’m in my early 20s and have had acne since I was 8/9.. it could be hormonal but different birth controls never helped, drastically changing my diet hasn’t helped, living in different climates didn’t help, my current prescription has been the only thing to do much of anything.. it’s a mystery lol

No. 461907

>>461838
This. Spending 100s of dollars on skincare is a scam. The beauty industry in general preys on women's insecurities. I've had pretty bad, cystic acne since puberty and a couple years ago I got referred to r/skincareaddiction somewhere on the internet. The information about skin types is tremendously valuable and doesn't meme expensive creams. I realized that the issue is hormonal and I'm able to keep my acne mostly at bay by taking spearmint pills and using drugstore products.

No. 461924

>>461907
The Korean skincare routines are super expensive and bullshit too. They also usually have the worst ingredients.

No. 461931

>>461907
A big problem with a lot of modern day skincare is that it's basically "treat the symptom not the cause". Yes you can apply harsh exfolators on flakey and oily skin to fix it, but those are symptoms of weak skin, eczema, or hormonal issurs and harsh exfolators do nothing to fix those issues long term.

No. 462009

>>461900
>I’ve been on accutane even and my acne still persisted lmao
could it be from dirt or a bad diet?
> it could be hormonal but different birth controls never helped, drastically changing my diet hasn’t helped, living in different climates didn’t help, my current prescription has been the only thing to do much of anything.. it’s a mystery lol

yeah it definitely sounds like a dirt, stress or diet thing, do you stress often?

No. 462014

>>461900
consider asking your doctor about spiro, anon. particularly if you see your worst breakouts around your period. i know you said bc didn't help but it also didn't help me at all. spiro on the other hand cleared up my skin completely.

No. 462015

>>461900
I had to do 2 rounds of accutane to get it to work and it took several years, then do a course of retinol cream. How long were you on it?

It's hard to imagine that if accutane doesn't work, something else will, it's such hardcore stuff. I recommend accutane to anyone with severe cystic acne because at that point it's a real medical issue that needs real medicine.

No. 462017

Donna was the only likable character on the original Beverly Hills 90210.

No. 462176

Here's a hot take I doubt very many people have: I think my Christian friends are way less judgmental than my progressive SJW friends.

After being non-religious most of my life, I converted into being a Christcuck a few years ago. As you can tell from me being on this thread, I'm not really the most devout Christian. I still like to party and read gay fanfiction. I also became more of a hoe after I converted.

I'm not super close with my Christian friends, because I can't be totally open about myself. But I do love their company when I do spend time in fellowship. I also never feel stressed out about them finding out about who I "really" am. In our interactions, I don't feel like they spend a lot of time telling people not to do stuff and we rarely talk about sex. We've never talked about homosexuality either.

On the other hand, I feel way worse about being around my SJW friends. Most of them are really into racial issues. I'm Asian so I don't get scrutinized, but I'm paranoid about them finding out that I'm sympathetic to whites. I'm very trans critical too so there's that to worry about that too. I lived with some of them this summer and it was so uncomfortable at times because they would never shut up about white people.

Because of this, I think I would rather spend more time with my Christian friends than my SJW ones. Weirdly enough I feel the best around my trans atheist best friend though.

Thanks for reading.

No. 462189

File: 1568467036769.jpg (Spoiler Image, 1.24 MB, 1453x1000, 2009118741_bxoU3PMY_0800.jpg)

Kim Jung Gi's art is soulless.

No. 462204

>>462189
I agree anon. He is clearly very good but he's way overrated imo. There's no substance in his art and the amount of naked women he draws and the circumstances he puts them in is super gross to me

No. 462205

>>462189
what is this supposed to signify and why do they need to be naked

No. 462227

>>462189
>>462189
He has dynamism but like.. the themes are so redunant and also even the body type he draws for the girls are boring

At least someone like Ralph bashiki draws these interesting hourglass figures with thicc muscular thighs even if they look all the same. They just look too scrawny

No. 462368

>>462189

who's art has "soul" according to you?

No. 462398

>>462189
wait this is the amazing artist people were talking about in the art thread? i see some artists can't keep their dick out of their art.

No. 462410

Sometimes cows are right to say that the people making fun of them on gossip websites are pathetic jealous losers and the epitome of 'ur ugly so i wont have sex with u' types of trash.
I'm so thankful for anonymous chan sites for this reason. If I saw a user with marked patterns for posting and certain afflictions over specific topics nothing could stop me from judging the fuck out of them as badly as the cows themselves.
They're so obsessed and angry it's like they're not even real people.

No. 462449

>>462410
most people aren't that jelly of the cows but a lot are. the ones who are though can be annoying. i just like gawking and laughing at people so jelly-chans really bother me with their whining. somewhat unrelated, i feel like if i had more of an online presence i'd have a thread on PULL (weeaboo dream bs), so i guess i can understand the salty-chans.

No. 462451

>>462398
>be male
>draw tits
"amazing!! a timeless genius!"

No. 462452

>>462189
I like his art, other than most of his women. He puts all this detail into everything, and then just draws boring cutesy pseudo-anime chicks a lot of the time.

No. 462457

>>462452

He said himself in some interviews that when he is not drawing he is masturbating. He is kinda simple minded, his life experience outside of art is is just fapping and going to military service so thats all he draws most of thje time, military stuff and naked women. At least he is incredibly good at it.

No. 462458

>>462410
Sometimes the people on gossip sites can be more amusing cows for me than the actual cows themselves.
>>462457
Yeah, I remember seeing interviews with him saying that. He's pretty cumbrained, but I still like the detailing he does in a significant portion of his art.

No. 462464

>>462410

I can see where they are coming from because some anons really are crazier than them.

I lurk Kiwifarms every now and some users are literally on every page of every thread that exists on the site. They lurk every thread every day, follow every cow there is. Even for me its crazy, sometimes i waste a lot of time but some anons really be batshit and addicted to stalking cows on another level.

No. 462494

File: 1568524138378.jpg (111.48 KB, 1188x876, CmWCMh7UEAAAULV.jpg)

>>461872
he's kinda cute ngl

No. 462539

>>462457
How can you be a true artist with such limited vision and banality?

No. 462577

>>462457
Is his job just letting people watch him draw?

Also, doesn't he have a wife and kids and lets them see his perverted drawings?

No. 462625

Anti Vaxxers are a necessary evil if we are serious about stopping the over population of earth and the climate apocalypse.
Bring back natural selection for humans.

No. 462626

>>462494
lmao I drew porn of him back in the day

No. 462629

>>462625
Unpopular opinion especially online but I wanna deck any idiot in the face that says stupid shit like muh natural selection

No. 462636

>>462629
Go ahead if you can.
I'm completely consistent that natural selection would most likely affect me too.

No. 462650

>>462189
He is a perv. He will draw shit like schoolgirls having sex with ugly middle-aged men and pretend people only dislike it because of "nudity". I watched an interview with him and he would give his kids his sketchbooks to draw in and they would see his porn art and go "eww dad" and he just thought it was funny.

No. 462685

File: 1568573691264.png (980.42 KB, 720x918, Screenshot_2019-09-04-15-12-54…)

>>462189
On a simaler note these sailor moon redraws have become a 'remove soul' button.

No. 462692

>>462189
I think it's a bit dishonest to only complain about his private NSFW sketchbook doodles that he only recently began to show the world.

No. 462693

>>462685
Wow those redraw eyes are terrifying.

No. 462695

File: 1568577117838.jpg (195.3 KB, 960x674, IMG_5203.JPG)

>>462685
i think some of the first ones were good

No. 462703

I can't get this sexless pudic mindset some women have. Like they are totally detached from reality and their bodies. How can a naked person put so much stress on your ~pure ascended~ minds? Being horny is not a sin, my girls.

No. 462707

>>462703
Is that you, Kim Jung Gi?

No. 462709

>>462707
fucking kek

>>462703
i really dont get turned on by naked people and i just am not that sexual. i like having sex and cumming when i care about someone but idk im just not a horny person unless in a relationship and obsessed. i equally dont understand like, fujos that seem to be horny a lot. no shade, just so different from how i feel

No. 462721

>>462707
>>462703
Seriously tho, is it? Or an artanon orbiter

No. 462723

>>462685
Those eyes look like she’s internally hemorrhaging

No. 462744

Lainey isn't a pedo and it's dumb that people refuse to sympathize with her because she has taken on Greg's traits. The focus needs to be on Greg. Her being inappropriate with younger girls isn't sexually motivated, it's part of her LARP and her part of being a culty sister-wife, and that's nowhere near as bad. In reality, teenage victims often become abusers, especially if they haven't been removed from their abuser. It does not make them as bad as the abuser. She's stockholm syndromed hardcore. She's also very stupid, so that doesn't help her or anyone around her any.

No. 462763

I like Skye but her joke about Onision getting raped in prison wasn't cute, and anons calling Lainey's vagina photos arby's roast beef sound like incels

>>462744
People have given her sympathy for years but she's still out here actively grooming minors no matter what you think her true motivations are. People can debate how much to blame her when it's all over, but excusing her from the focus now would just be obscuring a huge part of the grooming narrative.

No. 462811

>>462703
I used to be horny af at the idea and thought of sex, and was even addicted to porn for awhile. After I lost my virginity though? Not so much. Sex is overrated af especially if its not with the right person. I literally dont believe women when they say they enjoy and consistently seek out sex with a massive amount of different men they arent in relationships with. Especially porn stars and other sex workers who literally get paid to lead pathetic mouth breathing males on and make them think women just want to cum all day and get fucked in the ass all the time. I just dont think its natural. Thats not being a prude, its just not biologically sound. It doesnt mean sex isnt enjoyable when its with the right person. Its just not all that or something for females to obsess over once they've done it.

No. 462814

File: 1568605231780.gif (3.76 MB, 480x278, ok.gif)

>>462744
>sending nudes to minors and being a pillow princess for the girl she's groomed and sexted since she was 14 isn't sexually motivated

No. 462831

>>462763
>I like Skye but her joke about Onision getting raped in prison wasn't cute
people make rape jokes all the time and no one says anything. Onision is a horrible person and people wishing bad on him is to be expected

>anons calling Lainey's vagina photos arby's roast beef sound like incels

why? people here claim women are aging horrible without a wrinkle on their face, claim clean women with freshly washed hair look dirty, claim deathly thin women look doughy, bash any body shape, bash any boob shape or nipple type, bash any facial features possible, you really put it past farmers to bash women with long labias? which whether you like it or not, are considered unattractive by most people.

No. 462832

>>462831
Now imagine if you said this about small breasts being considered unattractive by most people. Or narrow hips and no muscle definition, lol.

Idk how her pussy looks like but if its a slightly longer labia than usual instead of an unusually long one then its fair for anon to be annoyed by anons making fun of her about it. You do know people finding any vagina with any type of skin on it unattractive is a recent thing right?

No. 462834

>>462692
He shows it publicly too.. so.; still not an artist.

No. 462835

>>462832
>Now imagine if you said this about small breasts being considered unattractive by most people.
it would be valid but if you ask most men, most people just prefer propotional boobs

>Or narrow hips and no muscle definition, lol.

eh, again depends. For men the standards are a lot lower and less complicated. With one you have places like japan that practically worship hipless and boobless women, then if you go to some ghetto in america they worship fat girls with big butts, in places like italy they like women with hourglass and healthy looking figures, etc.

>Idk how her pussy looks like but if its a slightly longer labia than usual instead of an unusually long one

her uncensored nudes were never exposed

>You do know people finding any vagina with any type of skin on it unattractive is a recent thing right?

maybe, but my point still stands. Lolcow is filled with bitches who use popsicle sticks for insults. They just hate to hate, you can have skin of a babys butt and be told you're aging horrible, you can be fresh out the shower and be told you look dirty, you can have muscles and someone somewhere on lolcow will find something wrong with your body. It's not an incel thing lolcow is just full of bitches. I don't know why you think it's magically different when it comes to genitals

and lolcow has bashed women with innie vaginas before too, the whole "gaping wound" thing

No. 462836

>>462831
>why? people here claim women are aging horrible without a wrinkle on their face, claim clean women with freshly washed hair look dirty, claim deathly thin women look doughy, bash any body shape, bash any boob shape or nipple type, bash any facial features possible
Well, anons are assholes for that too. I've complained about it many times and although I'm NTAYRT, I think making fun of someone's vag is unwarranted too. The whole roastie meme is particularly nasty tbh… started by and entirely perpetuated by incels, about something women cannot change, that is directly related to sex and can easily turn into a complex. I've seen many posts from anons who feel insecure about their labia and I'd spare them a thought before I made a cheap shot at a cow with it.

No. 462838

>>462835
Im not the same anon btw

No. 462839

>>462836
Its like the internet has made people cease to control their thoughts and be mindful

The internet has far more flaws than cons tbh

No. 462852

>>462836
Not that anon but all things aside, making fun of some girl's genitals is just kinda creepy. Particularly if she's not even a camgirl and it's not something anyone can or will ever see. I'm straight and I've never had the compulsion to want to look at another woman's vulva.
At least with wrinkles, weight, and tits the comments sorta make sense because everyone can easily see and make remarks on those features. Crotch though? That's just too much man.

No. 462863

>>462835
>her uncensored nudes were never exposed
That makes this always worse, anons have connected the characteristic of 'roastie' to a sexually predatory woman who has had two kids as if they believe there's a correlation. They should confront themselves for their internalized incel logic.

If anons want to joke about her showing her vag to minors they could get creative, like calling it her child snatch-er or something.

No. 462874

I judge fat people. It takes almost no work to be a healthy weight, if not necessarily fit. Skinny fat isn't ideal, but it sure is a hell of a lot better than being obese! Fat men in particular disgust me because the male metabolism is so efficient and the body doesn't hold onto fat the same way women's bodies are designed to. At the same time, I also hate how feminists approach fatness, as if telling women to self-medicate with food and consume endlessly will ever help us. I have sympathy for new mothers, ED-chans, and those who have gained weight after being on steroids for medical issues though.

No. 462877

>>462874
>as if telling women to self-medicate with food and consume endlessly will ever help us

Exactly. I have seen feminist discussions around fat where some posters will sensibly type "being obese isn't healthy" and then a few other clearly eating disordered individuals will have a meltdown over "fat phobia".
People can gain fat for a variety of reasons but I have no tolerance for those who stick their head in the sand and pretend its healthy. One really annoying type is those who think losing weight is just somehow impossible for them, when the problem is that they simply do not want to eat less junk, because junk food is comforting. Understandable but annoying.

No. 462911

>>462863
Have any anon made roastie jokes? From what I've seen they're only mocking that one guy on Twitter

No. 462912

>>462852
Again. It's lolcow. Stop going on pt or snow if buwllies are too much for you and some how making fun of every feature possible is ignored but you draw the line at genitals because it's sooooo creepy and you're a good straight girl unlike creepy gross lolcow dykes

No. 462914

>>462912
NTA but sound like youre projecting and making up a narrative so you can feel better about your insanity, lmao. Bpdfag.

No. 462915

oh noes how women get offended at scrote like brusque behavior so im gonna make it about sexuality to feel better about my mental disorder :{ the internet is only about freedumb of speech if you dont disagree with anything

No. 462918

>>462914
For saying it's normal that lolcow makes fun of women's bodies? You sound awfully insecure and pretentious. Maybe use actual arguments instead of screaming, crying, and claiming anyone you don't like is a scrot or bpd or else you just sound like some unhinged insecure bitch

I will ask again, anons here make fun of almost all body types and anything possible, what makes vagina so different and ~creepy~? Why is making fun of perfectly normal features women can't help ok but you draw the line Arby's jokes? No one said anything when anons made fun of innie vaginas, you know since you care so much about defending women's genitals from being made fun of on a site known to shit on women's bodies

No. 462944

>>462918
Blah blah insecure and pretentious you sound like a borderline personality dumbfuck.. If you get insecure and pretentious because someone with the right mind and isnt a complete idiot rationally thinks making fun of someones genitals is cringe I dont know what to tell you. Sounds like your only life is online and imageboards

No. 462945

File: 1568651982586.gif (742.92 KB, 500x264, mg01.gif)

>>462763
>anons calling Lainey's vagina photos arby's roast beef sound like incels

Glad someone else noticed this. They immediately went to Arby's/beefy insults, 0 to 50, without ever seeing it and it totally reads as males. The backlash you got as well sounds like male posting or underage "we nitpick all the time here look where you are!" like, seeing women get nitpicked all day has never been funny or cool. enough of that happens to women as it is.

Lainey's a POS groomer but that is not the point at all, too bad everyone has tunnel vision.

No. 462961

>>462763
I don’t have a problem with anons going oot with kainey and gurg. Despite the wealth of milk that’s been dumped this week, all the victims coming out with evidence, it’s highly unlikely that anything legal will happen for the ogregs. They get to go on and act like nothing’s happening. If it makes anons feel better to liken Lainey’s man-puss to shredded beef, or Greg’s face to shriveled ballsack, I say go hog wild. The only justice we’ll probably ever see is the inevitable meltdown from the lurking onions. Considering no angry fathers have murdered them yet is a fair price to pay for some hurt feelings over name-calling. But I can understand why some anons are put off, with any other cow, I’d probably feel annoyed too. Also it’s important to note anons didn’t even start the Arby’s joke, a victim of Greg’s abuse started it.

No. 462965

>>462944
The issue is that all gentials are made fun of here but you only seem to have an issue with outtie vagina, you are clearly coming from a place of insecurity and not ration, that's the issue, understand?

No. 462968

>>462945
I'd agree if y'all actually stood up when other body types are bashed, people have called cows with innie vaginas gaping wounds since 2014, and no one has said a word but all hell brakes loose when outtie vaginas get picked on, why?

Incels call vaginas gaping wounds too so that's not an excuse, just admit that if you think outtie vaginas being mad fun of is some different sinister thing only incels would do, you are coming from a place of insecurity

No. 462971

>>462968
obvious maleposter is male and posting

No woman speaks like this. Go troll about vaginas somewhere else(rf paranoia)

No. 462972

>>462971
How so? You're kinda proving my point anon… You sound like a troll, yourself. Did you even read anything I said? You clearly didn't if you think screaming "man" at me is a logical defense

No. 462977

>>462968
I always thought "gaping wounds" applied to any vulva someone thought was ugly. I've never seen my type get picked on.

No. 462980

>>462977
Nah they called them to women with pink innie vaginas and no inner labia, almost all vaginas get picked on here, check out the camgirls thread and syren cove thread

No. 463042

>>462965
>but you only seem to have an issue with outtie vagina
Nayrt but the issue here is the adoption of the roastie meme which is usually used to debase girls online by redpill type guys. Nobody cares what Lainey's vagina actually looks like or what types of vaginas anons have, the problem is that the roast beef analogy is loaded with yikes.
That's the issue, understand?

No. 463046

I think the way the legitimate onision grooming allegations are being handled is outright awful.
You got victims sharing revenge porn and shit on twitter for giggles and making petty remarks about genitals.
They seriously expect this to have long term ramifications for the swamp.

No. 463063

>>463042
which I'd support if she didn't act like it was unusual of farmers to make fun of vaginas, which was my first problem. Farmers have an issue with everything possible, obviously, they're going to make fun of outtie vaginas too

my second issue is the fact long labias are the only thing farmers seem to stand up for, not when innie vaginas are made fun off, not when farmers claim a cow has 10 STDs for having mild razor burn, not when any boob shape is made fun of, not when women with smooth skin called aging badly, not when girls are called fridge shaped for not having hips and ass that poke out 10 feet, only outtie vaginas being made fun of gets this much defending

I then go on to explain how when other redpill memes that have been used on girls to shut them down are used, no one cares unless it's the roastie meme. Farmers are just petty but as admin said, claiming everyone is a man is pathetic paranoia and not a valid argument, it just turns this site into a meme and makes us look bad

No. 463068

>>463063
It sounds like your entire argument is based off what you see in the camwhore threads, which are filled with other camwhores. The petty shit that goes on in those is more extreme than elsewhere on lolcow because it's somewhat, slightly more understandable to nitpick what those girls are showing off and selling on a daily basis. Can you not see why it might be inappropriate on a thread about someone who isnt a camwhore, filled with posters who aren't camwhores, but just a bunch of regular people who probably dont spend their time critiquing innie vaginas?

No. 463077

>>463068
>anywhere on lolcow
>regular people
kek

anyway it's to be expected. Farmers are just petty, doesn't make them men, it's to be expected, I don't see why you think this is anything new

No. 463097

>>463063
>my second issue is the fact long labias are the only thing farmers seem to stand up for, not when innie vaginas are made fun off
Because that literally never happens, grow the fuck up. This is the equivalent of models whining about how hard being pretty is.

No. 463099

>>463097
then why not stand up for saggy boobs? or small butts/hips? only long labias get stood up for this much

No. 463103

>>463099
I stood up for saggy boobs and small hips and asses before so.

No. 463113

I think gang stalking is real, but typically only for "special" people (ie those who are politically-linked in some way, or those that have pissed off their local authorities). A lot of people who complain about it are, in fact, just crazy, but there are definitely real cases.
Honestly, if someone isn't liked at work, school or in their neighborhood, they could easily be seen as any small to medium sized group of people's personal lolcow, and said people might just be sadistic enough to collectively harass, stalk and gaslight them.
Hell, targeted harassment and bizarre levels of voyeurism happens to celebrities all the time, but people think that's normal.

No. 463132

>>463113

Targeted harassment is real af. I don't think it even requires a complicated concerted effort with many people involved like some victims claim, making someone paranoid is pretty straight forward, like a lot of us know just one single stalker can alter your perception and make it seem like you can't trust nobody and everyone you meet is in on it.

A lot of these legit organized gaslighting cases may just be a couple of spooks in a van blasting some weird frequency ultrasounds to your house to drive you nuts. I remember reading an article that uses certain frequencies of sounds to account for anxiety and paranormal sightings that are more frequent in certain places, like you don't register the sound but it still triggers a stress response in your body and you feel extreme danger and that a ton of people are watching even when nobody is there.

No. 463224

>>462968
>if y'all actually stood up

You get bullied out of the threads if you do, or get accused of WKing.

No. 463279

>>463224
that's why long labias and people standing up for them is so different

lolcow is just petty and if you can't handle nitpickers lolcow is just not your speed

No. 463356

>>458822
About to get hated on by this whole thread, but very often I think about how I would prefer to have cancer over a mental disorder. I have dysthymia (some people call it high functioning depression bc in a sense it's a low grade, long term, manageable depression) and it's ruined so much of my life. It's ruined my self esteem, ability to form long term friendships, take risks, ability to go into work everyday without fearing the worst or hating my life, making decisions, etc. Not only that, but no one I do tell understands it, and for the most part I don't talk about it because it isn't a physical illness that people around me would acknowledge and take into account. It not being physical also stops me from believing I have it too, like I can't even give myself the respect of acknowledging that something is wrong with me and that it's not my fault. At least with physical illnesses, you are in a mental state where you can appreciate the things you have and god forbid if you become terminally ill, you can look back on the good times. I literally don't have the ability to do that. Mental illness makes you feel apathetic to possibly one day having a life threatening disease because to you it feels like you have nothing to lose. I feel pretty ashamed just typing that all out considering I've lost people to cancer and know it's no joke.

No. 463361

>>463356
Don't be ashamed anon, I know exactly where you are coming from. Sometimes people are just dealt shitty hands on life and you work with what you've got if you want to continue living here. I know offering this up won't be terribly helpful but just take it one day, one breath, at a time. If you ever find yourself feeling at peace, take careful note of that, like a favorite picture in your brain to look at later. Start collecting those and treasure them. Also remember mental/mood disorders are not the only disorders that have no apparent physical manifestation so don't let that be a barrier to acceptance. You sound like you're already on your way but allow yourself to fully feel your pain and understand it's totally normal and okay for you to feel that way.

No. 463364

>>463356
I agree with the idea of having cancer over having a mental disorder because people think the latter is a moral failing. Whereas the former is a physical, tangible state beyond one's control.
Let's face it, mental illness is still highly stigmatized and very few people view all the "non-crazy" forms of mental illness as not as serious or within someone's control 100% if only they would try hard enough.
Society just doesn't seem to have the time or capacity for empathy over peoples' invisible struggles. And even when they manifest into physical forms (lax hygiene, self-harm, unaesthetic eating disorders, unemployment, addiction) people just wind up judging worse.

No. 463373

>>463364
great post, anon. thank you so much for posting this, it means a lot to me. it's so true. as someone who has self harmed in almost all of these ways and just given up on myself, i really appreciate my reality being validated. people have no idea how much people deny the reality of people who suffer in this way and how much contempt you have to face on top of everything and how much that makes life so much worse on top of what we're already dealing with.

No. 463386

>>463364

It depends on where you are, in certain places is the other way around and you have kids faking and self diagnosing disorders because their environment is way too condescending with mental illness and people with those conditions get a lot of acceptance, special treatment, validation and excuses to get away easy from stuff and even collect neetbux from the government. But then theres latin american countries were they think depression is a myth and bullying builds character and cures gayness so its relative.

No. 463399

>>463099
>only long labias get stood up for this much
That's because saggy boobs just means boobs that got saggy, but the roastie/roast beef has a whole loaded connotation from incels weaving a misogynistic lore about how girls that have had too much sex get a loose saggy darkened vagina, and that if a girl naturally has anything except a baby pink innie then she's either lying or genetically destined to be a slut.
Seriously, were you asleep through the whole incel phenomenon? The roastie meme is more than just a garden variety insult meaning "long labia".
I'm over this whole debate since the hypothetical length of Lainey's vag is irrelevant when we'rediscussing her grooming activities, but I wanted to weigh in.

No. 463406

Drugs do make you a little stupider, even if you have a small habit for a small amount of time. Maybe you can recover some, but you still have some affect left over.

No. 463410

>>462685
Why did they make her face so much lower?

No. 463418

>>463399
It's not just about roastie tho, the anons were talking about all hate against long labias in general

No. 463423

File: 1568792250834.jpg (25.23 KB, 240x297, DW mad.jpg)

>>463399
There was a "medical" textbook from India or Napal or something floating around not long ago that had a guide to determine if a woman was a virgin, and it used labia shape, color, and texture as identifying factors. Incels didn't invent this myth– it's been around for ages.

Requests for labiaplasty have skyrocketed in the last five years. It's really fucking sad that people feel compelled to surgically alter a body part only a handful of other people will ever see because of porn and misogyny. Porn causes so many problems– it blows my mind how many people support/defend it despite knowing about its negative consequences.

I'm a virgin, but I have I guess larger than average labia. Great, just another thing about me that I can't help that makes me gross and imperfect. I'm kind of wondering what men are going to start scrutinizing about us next. Our kneecaps? Our earlobes? Our toes? It's anyone's guess. But if it makes women insecure and surgeons can make money off of it, anything goes.

Some sex toy company actually had a competition for "prettiest vagina" where men (and men only) voted on a bunch of pictures insecure hand-maidens submitted and the "winner" was flown to wherever the company was to have a no doubt disgusting and invasive procedure to make a mold of her fucking vagina so they could make sex toys out of it. And this fucking bint who won had the nerve to describe it as "empowering" and "not shaming other women". Yes it fucking is!

I hate men. I hate porn. I hate handmaidens. I hate cosmetic surgery. I hate the beauty industry. I wish everybody looked exactly the same and we reproduced asexually like fucking jellyfish.

No. 463429

>>463423
>Porn causes so many problems
It's funny because you'd think porn is the one thing that actually proves the 'long labia = slut' thing is utter nonsense. If a lot of sexual partners resulted in changes to the vagina, it would be captured on video over the career of a porn star. Even if they got labiaplasty, there would be a point in time where you can see it changes.

But god forbid scrots ever let logic get in the way of their sheer disdain for women.

No. 463434

>>463406

weed absolutely makes people easier to bullshit and indoctrinate, it makes people very gullible.

No. 463666

The Vicky thread seems like the most pointless one on this whole site. Some old bloated hag sucks at tattoos and lies about everything… so revolutionary.

No. 463728

I'm sick of seeing false equivalencies being made by people to drive home that being fat is unhealthy.
We all know fat is unhealthy but people don't have to make themselves sound stupid over it.

Specifically when people compare anorexia to being obese, or heroin addiction.
Anorexia is actually more acutely morbid and will kill someone younger and quicker. It is not comparable and it's a different mental illness.

Heroin use also tends to kill people quicker than being fat. Also if heroin users were told that, as a part of essential life function, they must take regulated and portioned dose of heroin every day, there'd be no sober recovered addicts. Being a drug addict is not the same as having a disordered relationship with food.

It's fucking nonsense.

No. 463731

>>463728
i don't think those are false equivalencies, anon most of the time the argument isn't "these are things that will kill you in x amount of time" but rather "these are things that will kill you that you're choosing to do to yourself". the part about them being just as bad is that it's a known health risk, like smoking.

i don't know about other countries but in the US, most obese people are obese due to diet, and many refuse to listen to or believe anyone about their weight/diet issues.

No. 463734

>>463731
>these things that you choose
I think we know that addictions and mental illnesses aren't really governed by logical, voluntary choice. Hence why there's so many programs to help these people.
It's dumb.

No. 463828

File: 1568943209437.png (185.52 KB, 800x368, sad.png)

>>463666
I love it when she writes posts like a huge neckbeard but shit like pic related is pretty much psychotic. I don't even know what I'm looking at and it's just insane that someone really zoomed in on THAT and thought it was good enough to circle and post. I'm starting to tinfoil that all these anons who zoom in on potato quality pics and circle them in red are just one crazy insecure person. I almost said this in the thread but you know I'll get bitched out. Hi >>706852

And most of the tattoo criticism are people who have never had tattoos saying "This is bad, right guys?" like, yes, it is not good, but these farmers are the most obvious in their quest for validation in how ~milky~ this cow is.

AND this is one of my top 5 or whatever cows I follow. So that kinda says a bit.

No. 463957

>>463406
Yup. Drinking in excess too. I wish we could talk about this more but people get very defensive about their vices, especially weed and alcohol because they're seen as harmless and casual fun.

No. 463961

File: 1568984144798.jpg (68.65 KB, 630x630, 2968724_0.jpg)

Cats are overrated and people that never shut up about bullshit like pic related are cringe af.
Also no wonder trannies are obsessed with ~uwu soft kittens~ and animu catgirls. Wonder what that one radfem who claimed disliking cats is antifeminist would say about that lmfao

No. 463970

>>463961
You say that as if there's a correlation between liking cats and the rise of trannies. They're just a cute animal lmao.

No. 463997

>>463961
I love animals but I hate most pet owners.

Cat owners can be particularly gross. The types of people who have cat hair all in their book reading coffee because the shed is in their unclean cups or flies off their filthy clothes that are covered in hair.
I just hate it when people act obsessed about their animals but do a shit job at taking care of their animals and themselves. Just because they're passionate and not outright neglectful doesn't make them good at it for posting internet memes. It's so annoying.

No. 464052

File: 1568998120110.jpg (4.38 KB, 150x128, 1533105926394.jpg)

>>463961
Can you hoes shut up? I'm so tired of this dogs vs. cats fight.

No. 464503

File: 1569126416180.gif (985.63 KB, 500x280, giphy.gif)

I fucking love Teen Titans Go and anyone who still whines about it is a scrooge ass bitch
TTG! ruins Teen Titans as much as 60s' Batman ruin modern Batman
None of you would have even cared if TT wasn't a weeb show appealing to your 10 years old weeb ass

No. 464516

>>463997
I’ve taken care of dozens of different people’s dogs and cats at their homes for money when I was younger and in my experience about half of both types of owners are neglectful to the point of significant detriment to the animal’s mental and/or physical wellbeing but not to the point of illegality (denial of shelter, food, and water).
Often people take worse care of their animals in proportion with how intense their public obsession over that species is (Facebook memes, collecting objects with dog or cat themes) or how openly prideful they are of their empathetic character or charity in adopting the pets. Litter boxes caked into 1 solid mass of cat pee, animals weighing over double what they should and never being exercised, dogs being confined to hard uncushioned cages with no stimulation for 10 hours a day, etc.
A disturbing amount of well-off and seemingly normal people are delusional and have created their own little hells for their pets, sometimes even while publicly maintaining the persona that their life revolves around their pwecious fur babies. I hate it too.

No. 464518

>>464516
wow, I dont feel so bad about not taking my dogs on walks very often anymore. i cant imagine keeping any of them in such states.

No. 464521

I believe people can have and take care of their animals correctly, it's just that American pet owners either tend to
A) pay tons of money for the pet but don't show any care to them at all, don't care if the animal gets sick, let's them run around the street and towards cars and wild animals just to cry their eyes out when Mr. Whiskers gets their guts splattered all over the road for all the children to see, let them get diseases, don't train them so they bite and attack random things and people
B) Obsessively caring too much, a lot of these people are mentally ill and use animals to cope
these all range from different levels of course though

ultimately, I prefer depressed cat girls who put all their cats in sweaters than dumbass hicks who let animals they know are vicious run around attacking things until it's hit or becomes fox food, which becomes another problem because roadkill, especially things that were once someone's pet can be particularly morbid especially if children are around

No. 464553

>>464052
This please.
I love cats. If other people dont like cats that's fine, I don't get What the point of fighting about it is.

No. 464625

not to sound like one of those nostalgia fakers but pertaining to physical attractiveness, why is everything more flattering back then?


cameras were more flattering unlike shitty super HD cameras with super color that makes you notice your every pore and makes your skin dull unless you have barbie skin, clothing is unflattering and either unflaggingly skin tight that isn't cut shaped in a flattering way or literal garbage bags (seriously who thought shift dresses were a thing)

makeup is more flattering and less cakey, shoe's are more flattering, you can actually do your hair without everyone thinking because you didn't throw your hair up in a bun you must be going to a ball or something, lingerie was flattering, classy, and sexy.
Coats were more flattering, cities actually looked like cities, people actually left their house, people put in effort to make their living space look nice and furniture and decor looked classier

now when you go out in most places you see boomers with shitty hair, cargo shorts and walmart shirts and jesus sandlals everywhere you go, simplicity or "basicness" is shamed to where everyone is terrified of being themselves under the pretense of being shamed for being basic, rooms are either messy or ikea catalogues. Boomers fucked the job field up as well as the housing market so young people have to put marriage and children on hold, music is shit and overly trashy and ghetto, boomers run around screaming at their wives and kids in public while yelling at 20 yr old ghetto rats for doing the same, cities have practically gone down the shitter and most downtowns are practically dead

I know they had tons of issues back then but dammit at least everything was flattering, you can go out without a camera being shoved in your face for the world to examine all your flaws, you don't have to go grocery shopping and see everyone fighting, getting full time and stable jobs was easy and common, houses and apartments were affordable, clothing was flattering, and so on

People spend too much time blaming others but I blame boomers and corporations

No. 464630

>>464625
You already answered your own question. No one bothers to take care of themselves anymore because no one can afford to. The nineties and eighties were a time of good financial standing for most people and the early 2000s crash to now have been terrible in comparison. Drinking culture, recreational drug usage is also bigger now in all ages

No. 464638

I hate gay men. I hate they being sassy and treating women like shit. Fucking fags, even the way they walk, speak and their faggy and exaggerated """femininity""" makes me gag.

No. 464644

File: 1569167545915.jpg (18.96 KB, 320x240, bender-obsoletely-_fabulous.jp…)

>>464625
cameras were more flattering unlike shitty super HD cameras with super color that makes you notice your every pore and makes your skin dull unless you have barbie skin

Give me back my blurry pixelated Super 8! When will corporations learn that mankind needs no more than 280p , curse all this food and commodities, curse yeee

No. 464659

File: 1569169672151.jpeg (33.05 KB, 640x427, 9FFFB480-8ED3-4752-8298-0068C6…)

>>464638
honestly I've been friends with nice gay men but literally every gay man I've met who has been in upper management at my jobs has been a fucking intolerable, anal, controlling egomaniac whos rude to employees, esp women, and it's a fucking shame to all the gay men who don't adhere to the stereotypes and who aren't anal overly flamboyant assholes.

the fag who works in upper management for my current job is insufferable and overbearing. being near or around him is a fucking energy drain, I hate talking to him and sometimes I'm forced to, everything frm the way he inflects to the poor decisions he makes annoy me (why are you in upper management when my store manager is better at management than you faggot), I can't tell whether he's that anal naturally or trying to adhere to the gay stereotypes as much as possible.

No. 464674

>>464638
Nikocado comes to mind kek he's such an overdramatic faggot really fits the stereotype.

No. 464727

File: 1569180285031.jpg (55.14 KB, 696x900, 3-gene-tierney-circa-1940s-eve…)

>>464644
not saying it needs to be SUPER blurry or anything. Humans naturally aren't perfect, human sight is naturally not super HD hence why it will enhance flaws. IMO HD cameras should be kept for artsy photography purposes of land and city scapes, not humans. Most humans will never look good with high HD unless they're editting, which can really fuck up everyone's views on how people look and how they're supposed to

No. 464730

>>464727
you know, this makes sense. you are right.

No. 464735

>>464727

But anon, your example is a very altered high res photo. Photo cameras had been able to get really sharp resolutions for a long time. Its just that now is widely available and not everyone is a studio photographer and the output is better, remastered old movies look sharp as hell, they were filemed with a higher fidelity than the projectors and home video output could show at the time and they were not meant to be smudged, grainy or blurry, if a picture looks bad is not the technology that ruined it.

>Humans naturally aren't perfect


Then the expectation of how you think humans should look like is what needs to be adjusted , holding back technology just because you think real life is ugly is a backwards way of thinking and kid of what a 2d obsessed weeb would say. Is like those hipsters listening to high fidelity audio and complaining that it doesn't have the grain from old records and it sounds like the artist intended it to sound or classic game fans adding scanlines to emulators, is nostalgia goggles. Just compare how disgusting early youtube videos were when the site was starting out, now even independant content creators can have good video, audio and lighting without that much money, thats not a bad thing just because i can see their skin bumps, thats how people look.

No. 464742

>>464735
I can see your point, but usually HD like that was more reserved for photoshoots in high lighting. Nowadays cameras are just shoved in everyones face and you never know if you'll end up on ifunny or reddit because your shoes didn't match your outfit or your hair was messy with the whole world roasting you ontop of all your flaws being extremely visable and present

No. 464752

>>464742

YEah but thats inevitable. Cars are dangerous, a ton of people die in car accidents, the list of ways they altered the landscape is endless but going back to horse power is a ship that sailed the momment the new technology was adopted. Adapting with safety measures and new etiquette and protocols is the best we can do, i definitely agree that it is an issue and people should not be allowed to use their cellphones everywhere all the time just as smokers are not allowed to smoke evreywhere, but the way things are going people will end up with their cellphones microchiped in their brains with neural link or something sooner than learning self control.

No. 464759

Drug "addiction" is not a real thing. And I'm saying this as someone who used opiates (including heroin) for two years. I quit that shit cold turkey and I didn't even go to rehab. Yeah, I had what was basically an intense flu for about a week, but once that was over it was fine. I also smoked cigarettes for five years and quit cold turkey as well. It wasn't hard at all. People who call themselves "addicts" are either depressed/anxious/have other mental illnesses, or they are weak and/or lazy. Drug use is just a symptom of something else, not a "disease" in itself, and it's extremely harmful to think otherwise.

No. 464760

>>464759
This is less of an opinion and more just factually wrong?

No. 464761

File: 1569186573888.jpeg (71.29 KB, 720x410, A1F3EF94-B21B-41BD-B5CB-6D8982…)

>>464727
Old Hollywood photos were heavily edited all the time. Editing has always existed since the beginning of photography.

No. 464762

>>464759
>and it's extremely harmful to think otherwise.

The non harmful alternative would be to play down the addictive qualities of heroin and opiates…

No. 464786

File: 1569190807909.jpg (22.81 KB, 431x415, yayyyy.jpg)

Even if you're older, other people should still be pleasant to you on your birthday and you should still get to have certain social expectations as long as the plans have been discussed beforehand.

Imo people saying how older birthdays don't matter are massively coping and are projecting the loneliness they've felt when others have been dismissive about or didn't acknowledge their birthday. They rationalize it as an "adult" thing that happens versus a "no one gave a fuck about me and that was messed up" thing that happens.

No. 464788

>>464786
Damn, I have never ever heard of this. The biggest birthday parties where I'm from happen when people are like 50+ and they're the best.

Wtf, why would people be so negative about that?

No. 464792

>>464788
I'm from the US and I hear this shit all the time. People here are called selfish if they care about their birthdays.

No. 464810

>>464503
piggy backing off your comment, adam west batman is the best batman and nothing will ever change my mind. modern batman is too edgy

No. 464821

Onision is cute

No. 464822

garbage tier bate anon. at least exert a little effort faggot.

No. 464823

>>464792
Im from the US and never heard anyone say this really…. personally I don't like having big birthday celebrations because I hate having so much attention but I've never heard of people being rude to other people for having a birthday party….

No. 464827

File: 1569199244229.jpeg (28.1 KB, 599x384, B0QoNSrCUAAY_3o.jpeg)

>>464625
half of the stuff you're complaining about is either false or something you can still achieve. nobody is stopping you from doing your hair, can guarantee no one is judging you for that. makeup wasn't less cakey, the cameras just didn't provide high enough definition for you to see and glamour shots were heavily retouched. you're free to decorate your house however you like. you can wear flattering clothes, no one is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to wear a shift dress. you don't have to listen to "trashy" music… like ok the economy is shit but if you're living somewhere where you're simultaneously being attacked at the grocery store, having a camera shoved in your face, and having rap music forcibly blared into your ears, then move? you sound like a boomer lol.

No. 464828

File: 1569199587309.jpg (594.15 KB, 954x1242, serveimage.jpg)

>>464827
She looks a bit like Amanda Palmer on the left.

No. 464837

People who use the n word are trashy. Both "a" and "hard r". The person posting scat in Venus's thread is probably making this opinion stronger for me.

It's not even about politics or being offended. It's just that hearing an adult use it casually and frequently makes them look like an indigent in my eyes. All I see is "I suffer from a stunted vocabulary due to internet and video game addiction, have a poor educational background, am a crack baby, a trailer park opiate addict, part of a low-income housing lifestyle and haven't yet evolved above the trappings of its effects on my language, would probably commit crime, am some other, unmentioned variation of this, or all of the above". There's just no place or need for it. I don't care about muh reclamation or muh free speech. You just sound broke and illiterate, sorry.
Even the people who say it ironically, as a racial insult, or for memes just sound tryhard, to be honest. Anyone with more than three brain cells can come up with something better.

No. 464846

>>464837
Pretty sure that particular anon is trying to be as offensive as possible in order to go back to /meta/ and squeal about "VeNuS HaS noOoO MiLk!11!1!!!" They did the same thing about a month or so ago as well. Whoever it is reallyyyyyyyyyy wants that Venus thread to disappear lol.

No. 464858

>>464846
why can't they just ddos the site like a self-respecting adult instead?

No. 464861

>>464858
Scatfags have poobrain.

No. 464867

>>464858
It's a teenage boy. They're the only ones retarded and overemotional enough to throw a huge fit while regurgitating the same edgy crap that's been plastered all over on the internet for over a decade. They're actually too young to even know that older imageboard users aren't remotely disturbed by this stuff and just see it as a big flag waving that says "I'm a minor."

No. 464910

>>464837
If this was about a certain accent heard in America, I would have been inclined to agree. But when you single out usage of the n-word, it sounds racist lol

No. 464916

I find it hypocritical when people throw a tantrum when others say "I'm depressed" or "you're crazy" because it makes light of their mental illness or whatever the hell, but everyone jokes around saying "that gave me cancer" or "I feel like i got a seizure" and nobody cares. There will always be jokes and exaggerations about illnesses and diseases no matter if they're physical or mental and people need to suck it up and stop choosing to get offended by them when it suits them

No. 464927

>>464503
>>464810
I agree with both of these, I like batman the animated series as well because it also has some camp thrown in but I've always hated Nolan shit Batman and found the original TT to just be wannabe anime crap.

No. 464929

File: 1569226156940.jpg (32.3 KB, 400x400, daniel.jpg)

>>464821
Face wise Onision at least in his younger years is really cute, he's just got a god awful personality and isn't aging terribly well.

'Asian' Onision is the cuter Onision honestly.

No. 464934

>>464929
Daniel is, unfortunately, pretty cute. He has to be, it's the only way such a complete and utter autist could have gotten as many women as he has.

Onision is ugly though. His skin is so bad I'd cringe just scrolling past thread pics most of the time, and every time I see his flabby old body I get grossed out.

No. 464946

>>464934
I feel like onion looked worse when he was younger honestly. The only thing saving him was his scene hair covering half his meaty face. His eyebrows pre-botox literally sat on his eyelids. He's still gross and crusty now but fractionally better.

No. 464967

>>464929
that's a flattering and filtered photo but yeah he's better looking than grease man

No. 464970

File: 1569237053132.jpg (132.19 KB, 768x960, EEcl3fdXoAERpxa.jpg)

>>464827
>>464827
NTA but I dont know why people automatically assume you are talking about fossil ass time periods like the 40s when others say "the past was better". Seems weird to skip literally 6 generations with that.

Also, I dont agree with you, heres an example of a modern celebrity Keke Palmer with 1980s makeup and hair styling with HD camera and it looks 100x more flattering than the current harsh weaves and harsh makeup styling women wear now. Idk why youd defend the straight up flawless doll porn / sex worker look a lot of women are being pushed to have now lol. You dont have to be a boomer to dislike modern music (I love rnb, disco, all black forms of music and LIKE some 2010s music but pretending 2010s black music is just as good as 20th century black music is a big ass lie) and that "nobodys forcing you to" argument is so tired and played and the equivalent of putting your head in the sand, lowkey is very crabs in the barrelish and highkey an American thing to say.

No. 464973

>>464625
Because the quality of clothes was actually HIGHER quality then. Anyone who has bought clothes or saved clothes before this decade will tell you that. Anyone who is denying it is being delusional.

No. 464974

>>464970
that photo is not particularly hd, it's just really sharp.

No. 464976

File: 1569238427448.gif (2.98 MB, 540x280, tumblr_p6iawuWWBT1roco90o2_540…)

ben affleck is the best batman casting we've ever had. if wb got off christopher nolan's dick and let us have old ass bruce with batfam on film he would've thrived.

also ww1984 is gonna be trash

No. 465000

>>464837
that reminds me that it's always the white-white guys who debate over if 'can white people can use the n-word'. Growing up if a white kid hanged out with the black kids in my school they could say the n-word and and no one cared, but if the white white kid said it was always awkward. Even if a white kid didn't hang out with the black kids they could still say it as a joke if they were casual about it. It's the fact that social autistic coder bros always try to use the n-word. If the 'white people can say the n-word' debate wasn't run by socially autistic coder bros with the emotional intelligence of rocks it would be a lot more accepted.

No. 465132

>>465000
totally disagree no white person should say it ever. I dont care if you got black friends or are fucking a black person. You have 0 right and i dont care. Now if you want to argue on why you think black people shouldnt say it I would much rather argue with that. My best friend is a white girl and I used to not mind her saying it until I met her family and realized that they are all fucking racist except for her. And she used to always throw her mom under the bus and tell me that she hates black people but im the exception. So I nipped that shit in the bud. Just because your best white friend isnt racist doesnt mean her mommy,brother,uncle, grandma etc arent. Remember that before you go offering white folks to say the n word in any of its variations.

No. 465136

>>464976
I kinda actually agree to an extent. I mean, BvS was awful and Affleck is gross irl, but he actually did a pretty good job all things considered. The writing was shit (Batman killing people? Yeah okay) but I actually felt
appearance wise it was the closet thing we got to the comics. Keaton was good but quite different and Bale sucked honestly (he was a pretty good Bruce Wayne though)

No. 465137

File: 1569268581390.jpg (33.13 KB, 402x604, cat778.jpg)

>>465132

Only white people should be allowed to call each other crackers, don't ever use the C word if you are not white(global rule 7)

No. 465139

>>465137
do you know the history of the word cracker or are you just disguising your stupidity with this edgy and boring rebuttal??

No. 465141

>>465137

>Racism and slurs are ok as long is against wypiplo

No. 465142

>>465141
Im glad you know edgy-chan!! Anyway i miss the old pink pill thread. Ever since it got fused with the gender critical thread I feel like its basically the gender critical thread disguised as the pink pill thread and it makes me sad lol

No. 465159

>>465155

chill out nigga

No. 465160

>>465159
ur so quirky anon congratz

No. 465200

>>464970
Girl just say you don't know how cameras work and move on.

No. 465274

I hate how disrespectful people have become when they're waiting for their fave artists to release new music. People are so rude and impatient, it's like do you know how long and hard it is to produce and mix an album? Lana del Rey for example was taking a while with her album to come out and people were having fucking meltdowns over it even if they knew there was a release date. I don't know if it's this culture nowadays that makes people expect things to just be given to them at lightning speed but it's annoying and ungrateful

On that note, I hate how trendy gen z speak has seeped into music discussion. "Queen slayed that track she snatched my wig she's goals she did that". Shut the fuck uuuppppp you immature brats

No. 465291

File: 1569305074271.jpg (1.66 MB, 1826x1350, 2018-06-06-05.57.57.jpg)

>>464970
>Idk why youd defend the straight up flawless doll porn / sex worker look a lot of women are being pushed to have now lol

Why are you holding past beauty standards on a pedestal? They're just in a different packaging but the standards are the same. It's fine to like 80s fashion and historical fashion but they aren't somehow better or more feminist or less oppressive than the styles of today. There's nothing even particularly that extremely 80s about her look there, there are more modern makeup trends than just Kardashian. I can find sexed up pin ups from the 80s too, each decade has multiple beauty standards.

No. 465316

I don't care about any of this climate change global warming bullshit. I don't. I love my plastic straws, I love my plastic cups, I love my plastic forks. Every time someone tells me my plastic straws are killing the planet I cringe so hard. Cool. Let it go. It's gotta end eventually. I won't even be alive when that happens, actually no one will be. People are so dramatic.

No. 465318

>>465316
>people are so dramatic
Well to be fair, the decisions that happen today will reap consequences for people who didn't ask to be born tomorrow. I'd be a bit mad if someone birthed me into a dumpy shithole because they couldn't compromise on the tiny things that add up.

No. 465320

>>465316
you're an idiot. you will be alive when things start going to shit and youre going to suffer for it as your quality of life will be greatly diminished, and countless people will suffer. how far ahead do you think this shit is? 200 species a day are going extinct. we're poisoning ourselves at a very rapid pace and are accelerating climate change quickly, and we have no way to compensate for those massive changes

No. 465323

>>465320
>200 species a day are going extinct.
I'm sorry but I'm gonna be completely honest… I don't really care that much. I'm just trynna live my life I don't care about some mosquito in the amazon. Earth has gotta go some way. Nothing lasts forever and I barely have any happy memories here. And I'm still waiting for an actual piece of hard evidence climate change is happening. No one can give me anything except hypothetical theatrics and youtube videos.

No. 465331

>>465291
Porn standards weren't the main for 80s, and yes there were 80s porn stars so what? It wasn't pushed on your face in fact it was cool to be a "strong woman" at the time though I admit the popularity and pushing of Madonna fucked it up for the girls the next decade. Also, black 70s/80s is different from white 70s/80s. I hate to "racebait" but it's the truth, and since I only know/care to talk about myself from my retrospect yes it looks better than how black women style/dress themselves up now.

No. 465333

>>465316
It'll effect you when the economy in your country crashes from the mass immigration of third worlders fleeing famines. But you're accidentally right in that individual consumers using paper instead of plastic straws does not matter at all compared to the massive scale of the pollution of major countries and corporations around the world.
>>465323
NASA is pretty good at explaining big topics to the public: https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

No. 465335

>>465323
why do you think the ice sheets are shrinking and the sea levels are significanly rising all around the world if not for global warming? you might not be pro-environment but there's plenty of evidence that backs up global warming.

No. 465344

>>465316
I guess the French aristocrats thought the same until heads started rolling

No. 465346

>>465316

Not that it makes a difference in the end wether you use a tote bag or plastic bags. Most pollution is caused by industrial complexes and stuff like textile industries and mining and energy industries that we can't really opt out that easily. The little things like plastic straws are there as pleasant platitutes the bluepills tell to themselves it makes them woke and above other people, they'll die just the same if shit goes down.

No. 465348

I don't hate rap but I hate how prevalent its become in society especially in other cultures

I wish rock and Metal could have become more mainstream globally in place of rap

No. 465404

>>465348
it was in the 70s-90s

No. 465406

staying on the topic of climate change, unlike the other anon i do believe that its important to make positive changes for the environment where possible (ex: less plastic consumption, less food waste, buying less, not polluting etc) and i do see climate change as a threat (although i also try to stay a lil skeptical) BUT i am very skeptical about the climate change strike and greta thunberg…

1. imo climate change strike doesnt do much… a friend asked me to join for the strike in toronto this fri and i laugh to myself about it bc ontario is in so much debt and not that climate change isnt important but where are we gonna find all the money… this strike isnt putting any pressure the pressure already exists so rather than striking why dont ppl go on a clean up rather than a strike?

2. greta thunberg should go back to school… not to sound like a conspiracy theorist but it really seems to me that her parents are using her as a political puppet while they continue to travel on jet planes and such.. i am mentally ill myself and she has anxiety and ocd… she is a kid and its great she passionate about climate change but to me she seems overly caught up in it like impending death is on its way… i just think its not healthy and if her advice is all taken from scientists (much of what she says is very simple) then can we listen to them instead of her lol

long but…. really this is annoying to me

No. 465408

>>465348

I don't think rock and metal necessarily but i wish there was a lot more variety and actual instrumentality in music. Rap belongs in a niche as any other genre, it only took all over all other spaces both mainstream, underground and alternative because its the easiest and fastest to produce and flood the market with, they are marketing rap to all demographics now.

No. 465414

>>465346
>Not that it makes a difference in the end wether you use a tote bag or plastic bags.
The state I live in started taxing store bags and at work we went from giving customers lots of plastic bags to no one wanting them because they cost ten cents. And at some other stores customers get money back for using their own bags. People get explosively pissy about it being a tax but it’s prevented a lot of plastic bags from being used so far

No. 465415

>>465346
It makes a difference because it forces people to unplug from consumer convenience and realize how unnatural it is. See above the poster who says they have no happy memories then defends their right to be so lazy that she can’t even wash a cup or fork. You think these trends aren’t tied together? Every fatass depressed underachiever I’ve ever met also is the most the most laziest and the kind of person that thinks that washing something by hand, reusing something, walking up the stairs instead of using the escalator ect is for third world peasants.

No. 465418

It really bothers me when people say that they care more about animals than humans. It seems sociopathic really.

A lot of times it comes with the attitude that humans act so terribly. But what gives people the right to judge other humans like that? And it's not like animals behave morally either.

No. 465426

>>465414
I love plastic bag taxes. Even if people don't care about the environment, why don't people think plastic bags cause an eyesore?

No. 465427

>>465415
Fatasses also have the same attitude as this >>465316

"lmao I don't really care about my body. We're all going to die anyways! Therefore it doesn't matter if I treat my body like shit or encourage others to do so. At least I won't die at 80 years old being miserable that I didn't eat a billion doughnuts!!!!"

No. 465431

Imagine being so obsessed with fatties you can't even talk about climate change without mentioning them.

No. 465433

>>465427

Thats not really a proper analogy, a better analogy would be if an already obese individual started acting like he is a woke fitness guru because he started drinking Diet Coke with his pork grinds, it makes zero diference and its only an aesthetic measure to reassure himself he is not fucked anyways.

No. 465434

>>465427

Then also “where are all the good men?”

No. 465445

>>465316
It takes literally the bare minimum to use reusable cups and forks, and are you some sort of vegetable that you can’t drink a beverage without a straw?
You know what, even if you were a vegetable it would still take zero effort on your part to use a reusable straw since your carer could wash it for you.
The selfishness of people.

No. 465446

>>465418
I genuinely despise people that have more empathy for animals than children

No. 465457

I'm fucking tired of the "cruelty free" make up obsession lately. I'm on the fence about animal testing, but I wear very little make up so it doesn't matter that much what I believe.

What pisses me the fuck off though is how many "beauty gurus" and "influences" I've seen who (some of whom aren't even vegan) be obsessed with cruelty free makeup and basically act like you're a terrible fucking human being if you buy make up that's not cruelty free or if you buy brushes that have real animal hair, meanwhile they still buy their clothes from fast fashion companies where the clothes are made by underpaid overworked (often underage) workers in sweat shops and then sold for 100x their worth. Not only do these influencers buy the clothes and wear them but they even do sponsorships some times.

And I used to think that they were just ignorant, but Morgan Joyce vegan extraordinaire who buys a shitload of fast fashion clothes every month that she shows in her haul videos actually acknowledged this and said that veganism was her "cause of choice" and a bunch of other excuses. She totally acknowledged that she knows the truth behind those clothes and keeps buying them though.

And I've heard enough people acknowledge this fact too that it seems like common knowledge at this point. It's funny how when people hear about employees working 100 hours a week, not getting breaks, passing out from exhaustion then not even having enough money to pay bills by the end of the week they just turn a blind eye, but when people put lipstick on bunnies it warrants outrage.

No. 465458

>>465445
plastic straws only contribute .03% of waste in the ocean. 46% of waste in the ocean comes from the fishing industry though. if you eat fish, you are contributing way more to waste in the ocean than by using plastic straws. just a fact to be aware of.

No. 465459

File: 1569344004185.jpg (93.11 KB, 980x652, 28603.jpg)

most popular american & british 60s, 70s, 80s rock/metal groups that people can't stop painting as ~~real music~~ are extremely boring and overrated. i can't get through a beatles song without getting bored within the first 30 seconds. pink floyd and ac/dc's music is also really repetitive and monotone. it's really not for me idk

No. 465460

>>465418
I feel like they're usually lying on some level to be edgy or conflating their enjoyment of the company of pets with care at a vital level, since they probably still would save a human instead of a rabbit, but it's a weird thing to say anyway and very concerning if they do completely mean it.

No. 465461

File: 1569344381096.jpg (256.61 KB, 665x665, 1563443730-49010100.jpg)

>>465414
have you worked in a supermarket? everything you see in shelves has been in packaging already, most often plastic. the store I work at is on the small side (don't even have a clothing section) but we produce roughly 7 cages (pic related) worth of plastic a day, that's like 14 cubic meters of really compressed plastic. don't think my personal plastic usage could even fill a quarter throughout the year in comparison and it's not like i avoid specific packaging.

like I do believe in climate change (what a weird thing to say lol), i just don't think there's much we can do on an individual level unless you're some sort of turbo oligarch amerifat, which I assume none of us are lol

No. 465462

>>465461
When I worked a clothing department in a supermarket EVERY single item of clothing was plastic wrapped. I understand that they have to protect the garments from dirt in warehouses and transit however it would be better if they used a thick tissue cover or at least bulk same sizes of garments of the same item in one big plastic slip wrapper rather than multiple singular ones. Honestly supermarkets go through more plastic than customers do with plastic bags by far - although it is a good start, they should focus on the companies theirselves rather than the consumers who waste much less or only accumulate plastic waste because of retailers and companies using so much to package items in the first place.

No. 465463

>>465461
this. like someone else said it's industry that causes most pollution. that combined with general ignorance and the "out of sight out of mind" mentality most average people have. i hate that those big companies are turning around onto the average person with these "everyone can do their part" campaigns, while not doing their part as a company. even if we started these initiatives 50 years ago it wouldn't be worth it because the average person isn't the one producing the trash. yet we get guilted into thinking we are, even though if every person on earth recycled everything and didn't use plastic bags/straws/etc. it'd still be a drop in the bucket.

No. 465464

>>465459
It’s true. This specific brand of rawk sound hella samey for the most part, exception of some experimental stuff. People who were into them back then and kids who are into them now were ALL special snowflakes. Me too though kek

No. 465465

>>465459

Agree for all the bands there except pink floyd and yes, those were really good albums they made and they still hold up. The others are trashy simple rock bands that were mainstream party fodder back then

No. 465471

>>465433
I'm not talking about people who act woke. I'm comparing people who refuse to care about their bodies/the planet because they're destined to die eventually. I see a lot of fat people who say that they don't want to take care of their bodies because they care more about having fun in the moment. It's a similar attitude with people who refuse to take care of the planet

No. 465474

>>465316
I'm so tired of depressionchans.

I wish they'd just kill themselves already and take some burden off society's shoulders since they don't care about the future or themselves at all.

No. 465485

File: 1569351047969.jpg (497.5 KB, 942x1193, 20190924_134332.jpg)

I'm tired of the energy surrounding Khia and Azealia Banks,

Ok for a oversensitive generation that cries when you 'misgender' them and like to be as politically correct as possible they sure as hell love giving fuel to extremely negative dragging people like AB and Khia because 'it has some truths in it' or 'it's funny', this is also not with them but with other celebrities.

The same people (the LGBT mostly G and T crowd tho) that gangs up on people for going against them be the same people supporting this type of negative as hell energy. At this point I think its some subtle psyop because women especially black women attacking each other is a kii and funny because it precisely discards any productive or valid energy. Also, I don't hate Azealia but when people say 'but she has talent tho' it sounds like they're trying to compliment an 8th grader for something they did for a school project to excuse something they did. It just reeks as inauthentic and subtly gaslighting even if she IS extremely talented in reality.
If they were really on board with her talent and smartness the people especially those gays wouldn't be kiing and cackling with her obvious mental illness and breakdowns every second (btw if its not obvious I have more empathy with her than someone like Khia who's too far gone) that enables her to go deeper into the fuckery. It just proves that sadly a lot of people in the black community love and thrive on negativity to the maximum and so do a lot of people outside of it.

A lot of this rubs me the really wrong way and shows some fucked up undercurrent with SM and the so called "woke" crowd but also those same GT goons that bully anyone to submission put praise their toxic kweens (male or female) for appealing to their female appropiative culture, since they hate women that much, also this applies to gay male identified women too.

No. 465486

>>465459
Sly and the Family Stone & Parliament Funkadelic over the Beatles or AC/DC any day.

No. 465487

>>465485
Oan I just want to add this helps me reaffirm this secret view I have of this generation (like the 90s and 2000s kids) secretly being some kind of "filler" generation before the 2 next generations after that can channel their art and creativity in a productive and brilliant way consistently again like the previous gens of this current one could. I's sad that AB is lone Millennial (and Gen Z group) really talented and conscious minded person in the music industry constantly goes on deranged rants and is reduced to he same pettiness a lolcow or LSA poster has instead of making that into their art while everybody else is either rehashing shit or miserably untalented.

No. 465514

>>465474
Based a-log-chan

No. 465584

>climate change or whatever it's called
The Earth will be here long after us. We are just ruining it for certain lifeforms, like humans.

No. 465585

File: 1569367372250.png (522.69 KB, 2080x1456, 1564779267468.png)

>>465584
Thats the narrative at least

No. 465654

>>465459
I hate rockfags so much and rock music is just so lifeless and boring to me.

No. 465685

>>465431
lol I'm >>465316 and I'm 140lbs (probably a fatty in their anachan minds) and work out 5 days a week and eat healthy. Not lazy at all, I just love plastic straws because I don't want my teeth to stain. How not giving a shit about the climate change hysterics correlates to you being a fatass? There grasping at their bamboo straws. kek.

>>465418
They are complete weirdos.

No. 465690

I'm friends with a few troons who had/have had dysphoria and I don't hold resentment towards most troons except for the non dysphoric "uwu nonbinary" they/them snowflakes. honestly hearing the perspectives of people who experience dysphoria kind of made me more sympathetic to them. I was never GC to begin with and I disagree with gc bullshit in general, but I also had never legit made friends with a tranny who wasn't an online attention whoring lolcow one, so it was refreshing, and it also opened up my perspective on the fact that most of the online ones are attention whore kids who'll probably grow out of their muh nonbinary gender phases

No. 465691

>>465690
you changed this post up quite a bit from your first one but yea good job on this very unpopular opinion.

No. 465692

>>465685
there are such a thing as silicone straws, retard. the point of the straws is to prevent animals from dying painfully from them, it's not just about like, soil erosion

No. 465696

>>465458
I don’t consume fish for this exact reason, nor do I eat beef or dairy because of the mass deforestation needed for their farms alongside the soy farms required to feed them

No. 465700

>>465692
that's still not anon's fault. she's not the one deciding where the trash is sent to. most of the litter on beaches that they make civilians and people clean up are from trash barges and crap like that. the consumer isn't the one putting them there.

No. 465702

>>465696
>>465458
actually not true. factory fish farming is safer than any other kind of meat.

No. 465716

Buttermilk pancakes taste bad

No. 465731

>>465716
Unpopular opinion, pancakes taste great when they dont have any sort of topping. Maybe the tiniest bit of butter, but syrup or honey on pancakes is gross.

No. 465734

>>465731
a slightly sour jam is where it's at bro, my grandpa makes a mean blackcurrant jam that's perfect to roll up in pancakes (those american flapjacks aren't pancakes imo, only crepes or eastern European ones are acceptable)

No. 465781

File: 1569418724430.jpeg (110.82 KB, 467x368, CF0D37FA-B1AC-4DDA-AC87-343AA0…)

>>465702

Factory farmed fish are about the most toxic thing you can put in your body, please do not eat it.

Also I don’t understand the teeth staining meme. The only people I know who have nasty stained teeth are smokers, what are you drinking on a daily basis that has that much ability to ruin your teeth and why are you drinking it if it’s so bad

No. 465784

>>465781
The only people I know that insist on drinking things through straws so they don't stain their teeth are wine drunks.
Most people brush their teeth twice a day and that's enough to suffice.

No. 465807

>>465685
Why don’t you just brush your teeth to prevent staining..? Smooth brain.

No. 465992

>>465781
I love canned tuna so much. I eat 2 cans a day.

>>465784
>>465807
Ya'll never heard of Coffee? I guess people just don't care about their appearance. I will brush twice a day and drink with straw because I care.

No. 466235

File: 1569513821887.jpeg (318.04 KB, 750x958, 98F70604-361D-477A-9F37-8D67B2…)

>>465992
Why bother to care about your teeth, or excessive 5 days a week, you’ll never be healthy or attractive if you keep eating farmed fish everyday. The cognitive dissonance is amazing.

No. 466253

>>466235
>you'll never be attractive if you keep eating farmed fish every day
this should be a banner image kek

No. 466259

>>466235
this is bullshit

No. 466287

>>465992
I drink coffee daily, with no straw, yet my teeth aren’t stained. Do you not know how to brush properly? Why not use a whitening toothbrush? Or seriously, just use a reusable straw since it’s cheaper in the long term

No. 466295

>>466287

It literally doesn't matter if you stop using plastic straws. Just making a pair of jeans contaminates more than all the straws you could have in a decade. The output of industries like the textile industries or the output from literally any other plastic product or the transport or energy industries to get you your bio degradable consumables doesn't even compare.

refusing a plastic straw helps just as much as giving a like on facebook. Its just there to make you feel better about helping out a good cause without actually doing much that matters or even inconveniencing your own routine too much.

No. 466297

>>466295
As another anon said, the issue lies with the animals that eat the litter and then suffer, not environmental impact

No. 466329

File: 1569518134350.jpeg (144.75 KB, 750x702, 72F34CCA-B1EB-4266-89DE-79B2E9…)

>>466259

Science is now bullshit, feelz is what matters I guess lol. Why not just eat nothing but raw sugar everyday. Tastes good too

No. 466338

everyone saying a tall girl like the one in the stupid fucking movie would be considered model tier irl is delusional. and why were the hundreds of teen movies before fine but this one isn't?
I guess I feel like this because i'm slightly taller than average and live in the european manletland so i'm projecting, but by now everyone should have understood that ANYONE out of the average will probably get both positive and negative remarks about what makes them different. the fact that they're all downplaying such experiences makes me mad.
end of the sperg

No. 466380

>>466338
the problem is that the movie treats being tall like it's a personality trait and that she's somehow an oppressed minority for being tall and treated like a freak when truthfully most tall women aren't treated like that

the other problem I have with the film is that she does absolutely nothing to better herself or learn to use her height to her advantage try out for sports or really have any kind of story arc, the film meanders for its entire runtime when something decent could've been done with the premise and could've even been satirical/funny

it's not like it's the only shitty Netflix teen comedy tho, most of them are, but I view it on about the same level as Sierra Burgess, the MC isnt likable enough to redeem even the good aspects Tall Girl could've had

No. 466384

>>466329
Wait..but I love salmon..what kind of fucking fish can I have?

No. 466386

>>466297

But then the root here would be how the straws are disposed off not if they are sued or not. The message would be disposed of them correctly in their proper bins rather than throwing them on the road and if they are being disposed correctly by the consumers but still end up in some river or ocean then wtf?, the consumers are not the problem but the government entities and private companies in charge of waste management and they are just shifting responsibility.

No. 466396

>>466380

I hated how she ended with the shortie friendzoned guy at the end. But that's not an unpopular opinion IMO.

No. 466397

>>466384

Wild salmon is much less toxic but it’s also under a lot of stress from overfishing, numbers decline each year. I loved fish too but I decided I’m not going to give myself myself to cancer, harm the environment just so some elitist Norwegian can make more $$$$. The problem with fish is their fat cell acts as an absorbent for toxins, basically sucking up everything around them like sponge, making them much more toxic then the actual water they live in. The smaller the fish the less they absorb,( like sardines) so you can try that, I can only eat sardines in small amounts before I get sick of them.

No. 466456

>>466386
>>466397
>>466329
>>466235
I'm curious what kind of farm this is talking about. Indoor fish farms are much better than the shore farms.

No. 466472

>>466329
What the fuck where do I get my DHA omega 3 then?

No. 466540

File: 1569540780647.jpg (115.29 KB, 889x592, Charles-Moore-New-Garbage-Patc…)

>>466329
>Science is now bullshit

technically, science is what created the problem in the first place.

No. 466762

Gay people, especially men, who use their sexuality as an excuse/pass to act like screeching, flailing morons are fucking annoying and an embarrassment

No. 466769

>>465992
>eats 2 cans of tuna per day
>drinks enough coffee to stain teeth unless using a straw
I hope you carry mints or something during the day.

No. 466877

Parents need to stop posting pictures of their children naked online for all the pedophiles and perverts to see. It's a known fact pedophiles lurk the internet and will creep on your kid or God knows what they'll do. Anyone who pulls the "You're the one making it sexual you pedophile!!!!"is a pedophile and projecting themselves

No. 466887

Ashley Graham is getting too fat to be attractive

No. 466890

>>466877
>"You're the one making it sexual you pedophile!!!!"
Ugh, I hate this. I fucking WISH I didn't have to jump to conclusions about pedophiles but they are so common it's impossible to ignore the possibility. I don't notice it because I'm a pedo, I notice it because I've had so much exposure to men online that I know what THEY like.

I've been working on my flexibility lately and some of the girls with instructional videos as super young and dressed skimpily (tbf it's appropriate athletic wear for stretching) but all I can do is wonder how their parents can let them without being afraid of perverts? At least the commments are sometimes disabled. But having seen like, for example, /tv/ being spammed by pedos obsessed with little Russian gymnasts I know for a fucking FACT that's what they like. It's not because I'm making it sexual.

No. 466892

>>466887
fat was never attractive

No. 466894

>>466877
Attention is more important to them than the security of their kids, even dumbasses know there's pedophiles on the internet so this is the only logical conclusion. Making their kids targets doesn't matter until one day their kid takes a hit.

No. 466898

>>466892
I know but back in 2013 and the previous years she was just chubby but well proportioned, now with her recent weight gain it threw her proportions off because it all went to her stomach and not her butt, hips, boobs or thighs

No. 467032

>>466898
>recent weight gain
she’s very heavily pregnant right now, that’s probably the cause of her weight gain. a quick look at her insta shows she’s still working out while pregnant so that’s cool. give women some slack when they’re pregnant.

No. 467155

The "my body, my choice" slogan should be extended to include euthanasia as well. If i want to die i should be allowed to end it in a safe, painless way.

No. 467167

>>466472
algae/seaweed supplement, chia seeds, flaxseeds, walnuts

No. 467178

>>467155
>If i want to die i should be allowed to end it in a safe, painless way.
Maybe true, in theory, but in practice should a doctor really be obligated to help you? It sounds like you just want to kill yourself, not that you have a painful chronic illness you want to escape from. I can easily see a doctor balking at assisting regular suicide compared to euthanizing a very ill person. That's an easy moral line to draw, since depression and mental health can't be deemed terminal or incurable like a physical health problem.

I support euthanasia I just don't think you've thought the 'I should be allowed' part through. Sure you should be allowed, but nobody should be forced to help.

No. 467182

>>467155
Consider this. Would you let anyone who says they want to die have euthanasia? Isn't that a bit irresponsible? How many people who attempt suicide and fail end up embracing life afterwards? I think there should be mental screenings for people who request this. Depression alters one's perceptions and those who beat depression may embrace life again. This isn't always the case but I think society should first try to help people who want to die by helping treat their mental illnesses. Also, this issue gets rather complicated when say, people who are terminally ill are depressed. It's interesting though because most are not, for some reason, and they still request euthanasia, which is fair.

No. 467186

>>466762
I feel like most people dislike overly sensitive camp gay men. They're just afraid saying in case they're labelled as homophobic.

No. 467190

>>466892
The only "evidence" I've seen of fat being attractive were ancient fertility dolls, and Rubinesque renaissance paintings. In the first case though, they're not even fat, they're pregnant. Pregnant=Fertile. Then in the second, the assumption is that artists were often painting fat chicks because that's what they were into. In reality most artists were working for commission, painting as flattering as could be believable portraits for extremely wealthy clients that rarely did anything but sit around eating bonbons. It's just how they applied filters in a time before mobile phones.Most women like a healthy weight range, and most men like a healthy weight range. Healthy is healthy. Healthy is attractive. In some cultures the ideal is 5-10 pounds more. In no cultures ever is the ideal 50 more.

No. 467237

>>466898
>it all went to her stomach
That tends to happen when women are pregnant, shocker

No. 467246

Twerking is disgusting and trashy. every time i see someone do it i cringe to the highest heavens.

No. 467254

>>467246
twerking is still a thing?

No. 467255

People "complaining" about being catcalled always sounds like a humblebrag to me. I'm 21, I live in a very urban area, and I've never been catcalled in my entire life. I'm average in literally every way- 5'6', b-cups, 122 lbs. I'm by no means ugly but I'm not a model.

I don't wear makeup. I don't wear tight pants, short shorts, or short skirts. I don't walk around alone in the fucking ghetto like the girl in the 10 hour video. I'm not trying to "victim blame", but maybe if you don't want attention, don't wear a full face of makeup and painted-on yoga pants and walk around in rough areas alone? My dad is a grown-ass black man and he doesn't walk around in the projects alone.

Only around 6-8% of women have been catcalled more than once in their lives, by the way. I fail to see why something that affects such a small amount of people is worth the media frenzy.

inb4 someone accuses me of being a scrot

No. 467259

>>467255
Men sexually harassing you is a humblebrag now?

No. 467265

>>467255
Guess what? Women still get catcalled when they're in full hijabs. Nothing you can do to make yourself look "basic" or unattractive will ever deter men from sexually harassing you, because it's not even about you, it's about being female, period.
If you haven't experienced that, great for you. Maybe you live in an area where men don't do that much. It's just ridiculous to call it a humblebrag just because you don't know what it's like. There's nothing flattering about it.
Stop getting pissy, listing off your "stats" as if they mean anything, and talking about how you don't wear makeup and yoga pants. It doesn't matter.
>Only around 6-8% of women have been catcalled more than once in their lives
I Googled this and didn't find any source. Rather, I found multiple sources stating that a shitload of women from Afghanistan to India to China to to Bangladesh to Croatia can vouch for experiencing street harassment. So much for the "Just don't walk alone in the ghetto" argument.
http://www.stopstreetharassment.org/resources/statistics/statistics-academic-studies/
Also, here's one article stating that it happens most to women between the ages of 11 to 17.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11637697/Catcalling-Women-sexually-harassed-on-the-street-from-puberty.html

No. 467266

>>467264
>thinking you need to be attractive for men to sexually harass you
Are you dumb?

No. 467269

File: 1569741880661.jpg (11.01 KB, 189x187, _20190929_012352.JPG)


No. 467281

>>467255
Yeah we’re all humble bragging about some fat asshole who’s over a foot taller and 100 pounds heavier bellowing at you about how he wants to see your tits or ass and knowing he could easily force himself on you if he decided to. Totally not a horrifying concept and not offputting. Who doesn’t want to be cornered by a creep who demands you listen to him talk about how much you turn him on and how he knows you enjoy it because you wore a skirt/boots/pigtails/the colour red/high heels/lipstick/a bra strap slipped out for a second/you smiled/ you literally just existed nearby some pig who cannot comprehend that your humanity is more important than his boner.

Saying stupid shit like ‘they’re bragging about catcalling’ is why women start saying all men are retarded. You bring it on yourselves.

No. 467285

I utterly despise Trump but I feel he is gonna win the coming 2020 elections because the left has learned nothing from the last elections and has in fact increased their emphasis on identity politics and have completely abondoned the working class

No. 467288

>>467265
what you're wearing definitely influences the amount of catcalls you get, and the fact that some rare especially retarded men catcall even women without any flesh showing in no way contradicts that.
I like being well covered, I feel safer and I like keeping my body away from prying scrot eyes. idc what ppl like wearing but if catcalls are so unsettling to you maybe make it so it happens less often.
doesn't mean catcalling is your fault or that scrots don't deserve the pillory for it, but I know I can influence it somewhat and take full control of whatever say I have in the outcome.
I know some women say that they win if the way you dress is influenced by scrots, but honestly I prefer being comfortable rather than engaging in this struggle of power bullshit way of thinking since they will never learn respect anyway.

No. 467295

>>467288
You can't "make it so it happens less often". 11 year olds get catcalled, fat women get catcalled, women covering their entire bodies as their religion entails get catcalled. Your hoodie and baggy sweatpants won't protect you from shit. Men consciously decide to catcall, women don't cause automatic vocal reactions. You can deny the evidence if it feels better, but it's there and it will remain there.
Your illusions of power in these situations are just that, unless you're actually implying we should all start taking testosterone and transitioning into men.

No. 467303

>>467295
if you are actually implying that scantily clad women don't get more catcalls than nuns passing by, idk how to break that to you. sure, cultural differences, some men that are always horny anyway, the one statistical oddity of the nun fetishist, of course, but then again I could go out and be crushed by a falling grand piano. maybe yeah it's not better to be covered, but being uncovered clearly puts you at more risk, that's just phrasing.
anyway, I know by common sense backed by experience there's this undeniable, sensible difference I can make by denying scrots view of my body, even if it's just scraping off the easiest 30% to ward off, and I am taking full advantage of this.

No. 467305

>>467303
Anon, I walk around in jeans and a hoodie or T-shirt with my two kids in tow and this still somehow doesn’t deter men, to the point that they will even get in my personal space to let me know I make their peepee hard. Your own personal experience doesn’t somehow discredit the experience of all the women that say that men catcall them regardless of what they wear.

No. 467312

>>467305
reading comprehension. when I say "ward off the easiest 30%" you hear "deter all men". of course some can't be avoided. but I shouldn't have expected you to be literate when you think walking around half naked gets you the same catcalls than if you had a monk habit moon boots and a hat.
do you think it's by smell that men decide who to catcall ? anyway my interaction with you tells me they may prey on naïve clueless women who look like they have no common sense.

No. 467314

>>467303
Imagine thinking men primarily fetishize clothes, and not female existence in itself (as has been shown time and time again).
But like, let's entertain your solution for a second and pretend like anon's experience in >>467305 totally never happens and really is as likely as having a piano fall on your head, and that women in hijabs or burkas getting catcalled is also a statistical impossibility.
What happens if/when every single woman is completely covered up 24/7, hypothetically? Do you feel like men will be like "Wtf? No crop tops, mini-skirts or IG makeup? >:( Guess I'm done, the femoids win this one, they figured us out guys" and street harassment will cease being a global issue for women? Is that what you believe will happen?
And, if that doesn't work, what will you say to women who complain about being subjected to it? Is it only then that they'll be allowed to talk about it without being accused of "humblebragging", or will the issue become that they must all be "walking too seductively" or something?

No. 467319

>>467303
So wear a niquab or don’t dare complain about men behaving in a disgusting way because you existed nearby? Lol blessed be the fruit anon.

No. 467320

>>467314
This. Oh my god, this. The "well you should just mind what you wear" meme is fucking bullshit, I dress covered up from the neck down, barely wear makeup and still get catcalled and harassed. I don't care if I'm getting catcalled 20% less than women who walk around with their tits and ass out looking like Kim K, one time is too many.

No. 467321

>>467255
I wear no makeup, I'm overweight and short, with large breasts and the "right kind of fat" to scrotes (despite it still being unhealthy), and I've been catcalled and leered at all parts of the world, with the worst being Europe where I was outright groped, forceably kissed, and followed on the street. I'm black like you btw.

No. 467322

>>467314
none of you read what I say. your canned outrage is out of tune.
I don't care what women wear and I have no interest in shaming them. I am just pointing out an obvious fact and sharing how I use this basic observation to make my life easier scrotwise.

No. 467323

>>467322
Anons can read just fine, you’re fuckin obtuse and have absolutely zero point to make other than repeating the cover up meme.

No. 467327

I think magneta hair looks fucking awful on caucasian toned skin and copper/orange/classic red looks far better

No. 467328

>>467322
What outrage? All we've done is point out that you're wrong. The fact that catcalling happens at all is a problem and a conversation worth having. When you repeatedly insinuate that 90% of us who deal with this must be dressed like porn stars and are just too stupid to put on a hoodie, then proceed to insult the intelligence of anons who dare to say it hasn't helped them like you did in >>467312, it becomes clear that you have nothing to offer. You think you invented baggy clothes and not wearing makeup? No. We've tried that, and can personally confirm it's not the clothes. "Well it would be worse if you wore tight clothes DUH", and what? The fact that it happens regardless is proof that the root of the issue is that we are female. That's what needs to be solved.
If it really is so rare for you, you have to understand that you are the statistical outlier here, not every single one of us. No one is humblebragging, and your "One neat trick to stop 30% of catcallers!" is ineffective and worthless for women as a whole.
If you can accept that it still happens, what exactly is your point? That we should just shut up and be okay with it? Men shouldn't be held accountable for their actions?

No. 467330

>>467323
i would love it if you pointed out anywhere I told anyone to cover up, or anyone to do anything for that matter.
why you guys are hell bent on shaming me for wearing my hijab is beyond my knowledge (or is it), even if I was being superstitious I would expect to be ridiculed and not provoke such an outrage.
whatever you wear you have the right to wear as you should, but yeah unfortunately scrots have eyes.

No. 467335

>>467330
>i would love it if you pointed out anywhere I told anyone to cover up, or anyone to do anything for that matter.
Here >>467255
How have we shamed you? When did you even mention wearing a hijab?

No. 467336

>>467328
the projection ! I have never thought any of the things you listed in your ten thousand line paragraph.
what I'm saying is, with nothing else implied, that lightly dressed women have to endure been more catcalls. not saying that it's right or that anybody should dress any kind of way, or that you guys are humble bragging. the thing youre right about is that I find y'all very stubborn/nonsensical about admitting this one piece of basic fucking common sense.

No. 467337

>>467335
>>467255 is not me though. I am >>467288. anyway, lunch break over, bye !

No. 467338

>>467255
8% ? WHERE are you getting those statistics because every woman my age I know has been catcalled. I literally have never met any girl in her 20's in my whole life that hasnt been catcalled.

Also I don't wear make-up at all and don't dress slutty. As for walking alone in rough areas, I live in a rough area. It's not like "the projects" but my (european) city is made so that rough areas are often near the city center. What am I supposed to do? Move and then not ever go in the city center? Be accompaigned by a male every time I step foot out? You're delusional.

No. 467340

>>467336
What projection? Do you even know what the word means?
>what I'm saying is, with nothing else implied, that lightly dressed women have to endure been more catcalls.
Like I said before, what is your point, then? What does that add to the discussion? Women who are fully covered in ME countries also get a shitload of catcalls. What do you suggest for them? Nothing?
I'm convinced your reading comprehension is at zero, and it's ironic that you said the same thing about someone who made more sensible points than you.
No one here can help you, just stop interjecting when adults are talking about issues.

No. 467350

>>467255
This post has so much troon/femcel energy I am in fact outraged
>I don’t get catcalled because I cover up
Is this cope? bitch you may just be that ugly

No. 467353

Most friends I know who've been catcalled haven't been dolled up or dressed in a certain way when they were catcalled, but they were mostly underage or barely of age when it happened..

That was my experience too. Short haired, no make up and wearing boring clothing yet I got catcalled as a teen several times and it's never happened to me as an adult

Sometimes it's the guy sensing vulnerability or having a predatory teen-fetish, not so much anything the girl is actively doing or not doing

No. 467358

>>467327
Agreed, but I'm going to add that magenta hair looks fucking awful on any adult.

No. 467373

>>467255
Yes because complaining about the creepy, older men who catcalled me when I was a pudgy 12 year old is definitely humblebragging, moron. By the way, calling it humblebragging only makes sense if you think being harrassed is desirable.

No. 467375

File: 1569768052305.jpg (425.51 KB, 1732x1731, 70i8uzbd5r931.jpg)

If you got 100% percent completion on one of those giant openworld games that require at least a month to do you shouldn't be proud.

No. 467381

"Humblebragging" is a dumb meme

No. 467388

Women who only care about beauty and dating and nothing else usually tend to be male-identified pickmes who feel competitive with other women and despise women they view as "inferior"

No. 467396

Sick of seeing the words narcissist, projection and gaslighting thrown around in conversation just because people have recently found the phrases and think they know what they mean when they really don't

Spotted a couple of cows accusing -the haturz- of gaslighting etc

Puts me off discussing any real experiences I've had with an ex trying to make me doubt myself all the time when I now see gaslighting as a term that perpetual victims have made popular

No. 467400

>>467396
I'm scared that people are going to make "gaslighting" go down the same path as "triggered", so no one takes it seriously anymore.
It's a word with a very specific, important meaning that should never be watered down.

No. 467404

File: 1569770773318.jpg (141.88 KB, 1280x720, DF8vDp7UAAAN13w.jpg)

>>467375
I never really got the completionist attitude beyond a certain point. Completing some difficult tasks or certain games where it's not that boring, sure. But the 900 korok seeds in breath of the wild, is that fun? The reward is just the game devs mocking you.

No. 467408

>>467396
My mother had a personality disorder, and once I made the mistake of using vocabulary such as 'gaslighting' during her arguments she adopted my language and reversed victim. I imagine that's what cows are attempting to do, adopting the language of the accusers so they can appear less crazy.

No. 467418

>>467396
God, I see so many people use the term "gaslight" to mean "someone who disagrees with me" and it pisses me off. Gaslighting is a serious thing, not just something you label someone who's being a bit of a douche in an online argument.

No. 467420

>>467396
I feel the same about /r/RaisedByNarcissist and /r/RaisedByBordelrines. Those subs may have started as a forum for children of parents with those specific disorders, but it slowly transformed into a general sub about abusive parents. They greatly contributed to BPD/NPD = bad person. A lot of them simply diagnose their parents off of huffpost articles.

No. 467426

>>467420
>They greatly contributed to BPD/NPD = bad person

The message is that people with those disorders are pretty bad parents.
And it's true.The majority might have been fine as friends or coworkers if they hadn't brought in children whom they didn't have the capacity to handle, and take their neuroses out on.

It's mean, but it's true.

No. 467428

Black people and gays are too over represented in western media.

Only going by american media you would think they are like 70% of the population in the US or at least half but no, they are like 10%, it just that for every white cast there has to be at least one black one and the whole colors of Benetton and sexuality even when they don't actually represent most of the population. Its so fucking dumb.

Also, americans think white south and central americans don't exist, every latino on their shitty media is a brown folkloric stereotype who can't even integrate.

"wanna go listen to salsa de mi barrio in the Bronx, lets eat tacos mi amigo, viva los iunaite estais ese, orale orale mariachi dia de los muertos ay ay ay i love my Mexicorican abuelita"

gross.(racebait)

No. 467441

>>467426
I think their point was that anyone who is a bad person is now armchair diagnosed as having BPD/NPD instead of being an asshole, people on them boards see one bad trait and start diagnosing a personality disorder

No. 467444

>>467441
Well in that specific sentence they were complaining that narcissists and borderlines have gotten reputations for automatically being bad people. While that's not true, generally speaking parents with those disorders are awful fucking parents.

I've also never seen someone complain online about their parents for just one bad specific trait, I'd have to read a story where it genuinely seemed like someone was armchair diagnosing based on one incident that they highly misconstrued.

No. 467447

>>467428
Why do you dumb braindead cunts conflate black with being gay all the time? The fuck does my skin color and genetics have to do with whether or not someone wants to eat pussy or suck dick?

Like it or not, black people are AMERICANS and they deserve every right of media representation as white AMERICANS and they belong to this country as much as everybody else.

No. 467450

Unpopular opinion: any time someone whines about having to see black people or thinks black people somehow conflate to the LGBT rainbow gang should be considered narcissistic faggots who are incapable of empathy or seeing people who they deem as disgusting as human.

I don't LIKE seeing you everywhere but I have to deal with it too. meanwhile you racebaiting cunts always bitch about the same thing day in and day out.

No. 467452

>>467447
>conflate black with being gay all the time?

Both are minorities, both are like 10 % of the population (at least thats what gay people claim, is exaggerated estimate but wathever) And both are over represented in American media way over their actual proportions in the population.

No. 467453

>>467450
your baiting is even tireder than the racebaiting, homophobe chan.

No. 467457

>>467452
Being a racial minority is not the same as being a sexuality minority though

How do you know everyone's sexuality either? There's a lot of "straight" men out there who fap to trans porn or would fuck their buddies on a lonely night if nobody was watching

Sounds to me it's not related

Overrepresented my ass. Sounds like your one of those white latinos who got too siddity and now you wanna turn your nose up because you got vaguely brainwashed by pol scrote rhetoric

>>467453
Not homophobe chan ok

I have no problems with gays I have problems with life support braindead idiots like OP who think I'm related to a gay because im black

No. 467461

Any race related posts or discussion is prohibited per global rule 7

No. 467463

File: 1569778642373.png (52.01 KB, 500x397, 49A13BB1-6267-40BB-8E61-CF10FA…)

>>467452
I seriously think some of you ladies drink a fifth of vodka every time you post, because you know that’s bullshit. Black representation in the media has decreased especially compared to the 90s and early 2000s. Besides a few tokens on shows and movies (most of them are shitty stereotypical characters anyway), there’s not many black characters to the point that every cast looks like In Living Color cast.

You sound just like the scrotes that complain about too many women in video games.

No. 467464

>>467463
I wish I had the privilege of complaining about seeing people I'm not sexually attracted to or can relate to all day everyday

No. 467465

File: 1569778973353.gif (1.53 MB, 358x200, 2345yui89.gif)

>>467428
>There are too many queers and blacks on TV1!!1!
>Latinos are white!1!!1!

Man, being a self-hating right-wing Mexican like this must be stressful as hell. Get therapy, anon.

Also, I live in a majority Mexican area in the U.S., and I've yet to meet a latino person who disliked Coco. I've met plenty of Mexicans who dislike "whitewashed" latinos, though. Face it: "integrate" is just a nice word for "act more white".

Also, have you ever heard the phrase "divide and conquer"? Racists benefit from infighting between POC.

>>467450
Wow anon, there are a million other ways you could have argued with >>467428 that didn't involve being homophobic. Also can you stop calling them "gays" or "a gay"? "Gay" is an adjective, dumbshit.

Why do you two hate seeing gay people this much? They're really not as represented as you think they are– you've just got confirmation bias.

>>467452
All of the LGBT combined accounts for 3% of the U.S. population.

No. 467466

>>467463

you-d have to be insane to believe it has decreased. Not only it has increased exponentially other roles are being blackwashed back and forth. So now you have black karate kid, black my little mermaid, black genie from aladdin, there was even news of casting a black actress to play Asuka on the live action Evangelion. Its fucking ridiculous that you want even more, again, only 10% of americans but they are at 100% of the movies, tv shows and pretty much anything american.

No. 467468

>>467465

guess what, i know a million latinos who hate Coco, touche, argument destroyed.

>"integrate" is just a nice word for "act more white".


So you do think every latin american is a walking ethnic stereotype

Ay ay ay you almost made me drop my sombrero with your great argument miss gringa


>between POC.


Only some latinos are poc you dumb burguer

No. 467470

>>467465
So I'm homophobic because you have a problem with "gays"

But you didn't care about my usage of "blacks"

I don't give a shit about seeing gay people or not – that was my point. You got a brain fungus, too?

No. 467474

>>467468
Lmao, an American claiming they're full white is already hilarious so I KNOW a Latino claiming to be full white is extra-hilarious. Even if you have mostly white blood you still have mutt DNA.

>>467466
>you want even more

Projecting.

For someone who whines about muh ethnic stereotypes (really why do people see me as a mutt non-white group) you sure are rude and dismissive of people who have more rights to the country than your immigrant ass does. Trump really needs to build the wall already

No. 467475

>>467466
A couple of movies and shows? Compared to how many black shows and movies that came out during the 90s - 2000s? This is why you must be young, because there was a time when EVERY show had every race (ex: Captain Planet, Hey Arnold, As Told By Ginger). There were more famous black shows on regular channels. Fresh Prince, Family Matters, The Cosby Show, In Living Color, A Different World, etc. You had the famous genre with the staid white cop and the wacky black cop. I can go on.

This is why POC unity is bullshit. Instead of hating on black representation, use your own channels to promote white Latinos. Hell, just get Telemundo, everyone in there is lily-white.

No. 467477

>>467465
>All of the LGBT combined accounts for 3% of the U.S. population.

Pathetic, yet they force themselves to the other 97% of the general population because hollywood is 100% fag.

No. 467478

>>467428
Oh okay I got it. You think you’re better than everyone darker than you, because you’re 2 shades brighter than most Latinos. Congrats.

No. 467479

>>467475
I never liked white latinos as a group but their men sure love me lmao

No. 467480

>>467479

Date brown latinos and see how soon you get a black eye from Humberto from the Bronx

No. 467481

>>467465
>Also, have you ever heard the phrase "divide and conquer"? Racists benefit from infighting between POC.

Nta the word POC is just used to divide and conquer people into "white" and "non-white"

The "White" people all around the US are extremely diverse in terms of cultural values, ancestry and appearance

An Italian American from New York and German American from the Midwest would both be equally as different to each other as Italian American and an Punjabi American

No. 467482

>>467480
I already know a psycho white "Latino" (really Catalan) who brags about owning slaves and killing people in war. That psycho Latin/o shit doesn't go out just cause they're browner

No. 467483

>>467481
Plus as this thread shows, POC are not monolithic and have different needs, cultures, and agendas too. The agenda of the black woman is different from a Latina’s agenda.

No. 467489

>>467468
It doesn't matter how white you think you are. If you speak Spanish and have latin American ancestry, you're subject to the same sort of racism all other latinos are. You think racists give a fuck what you think you are? They hear Spanish and their mind is made up.

Also, the reason Mexican culture is the most commonly represented latino culture in U.S. media is because most of the latinos in the U.S. are Mexican!

>>467477
Homophobe-chan, when are you going to realize that fucking no one wants you here? You're not subtle and you're not changing anyone's mind.

>>467474
>Trump needs to build the wall already
Most illegal immigrants flew or drove here legally on visas and then the visas expired. A wall doesn't accomplish shit, retard. It's just a waste of peoples' tax dollars.

No. 467491

>>467489
>defending immigrants after racist immigrant sperging about blacks

nah

No. 467492

>>467486
I put Latinos in quotation marks but aren't they a Latin people?

No. 467493

>>467489
This is why I’m worried when America becomes a majority Hispanic/Latino, the racism will be 100 times worst, because they’re more racist and colorist than regular white people.

No. 467499

>>467493
Not to mention homophobic. This is anecdotal, but the lesbians I know who experienced the worst parental abuse are latina. It's because of the prevalence of devout Catholicism in latin America (which is in and of itself a result of imperialism).

Have you ever seen what happens when a black guy tries to date a latina woman? My stepdad is black and my mom is white, but she often gets mistaken for Mexican. The racism they experience is unbelievable.

Although I wouldn' worry about it, anon, and here's why: those think-pieces about a majority non-white America aren't based on a model where people "come in". It's based on the increasing prevalence of interracial families. So when people say America will be majority POC, what they mean is majority mixed. Which is a good thing, because more interracial unions hopefully means less racism. Bigotry is a learned behavior, not a hereditary one.

No. 467503

>>467489
>A wall doesn't accomplish shit,

It does, it stops fence jumpers and coyotes, thats a business run by narcos and how they get a bunch of Maras and sicarios who would not get visas otherwise or who already were deported from the US once or more than once. I hope he does build it.

Also, i don't know why sjws love illegals so much. Latinos hate illegals, they ruin every neighborhood, they lower the bar for everyone, do sjw really think illegals love homos and women? they are the most violent and misogynistic demographics, they don't care about your first world middle class standards.

Only rich plantation owers have a reason to like illegals. Ironically those illegals are the ones bad mouthing americans and their culture the most and refusing to even learn english, they belong back in latam.

>>467489

Lol no, people emigrate to the US for a reason. You would get shit on more in Latin America, just check the violence statistics. White people are pretty nice and way too accommodating and PC.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 467504

>>467493

I really doubt the Hispanic population will “overwhelm” the USA. Undoubtably it will continue to grow, follow by a significant decline associated with all urbanized populations in the developed world that will put them in line with whites. Add to that daibetes/obesity epidemic, which is most significantly represented in Hispanics, and you have a even lower fertility rate as obesity is directly correlated with problems having children.

No. 467505

>>467499
The irony of that racism when the most catcalling and outright dangerous experiences I've faced were from Mexican and Latino men as a black woman

No. 467509

Discussion of race is banned on this board. Any further posts continuing the conversation will get an automatic 4 day ban.

No. 467510

>>467499
>majority mixed. Which is a good thing

No, Mr Soros. It means a decline in IQ, increase in crime and decrease in quality of life.

>because more interracial unions hopefully means less racism. Bigotry is a learned behavior, not a hereditary one.


Lol no, it will make all of those worse, the US will simply become Brazil 2.0 or nay shithole with majority mix race population. Historically is the sign of the downfall.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 467512

gay acceptance movement was over when lgb got grouped in with the t. the overwhelming majority of non-lgbt people will never approve of transitioning. as technology gets better and they find different surgeries it will become a bigger problem.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 467513

>>467489
NTA, but I've been accused of being "Homophobe-chan" before and I've seen plenty of other anons getting accused too. There is more than one person on lolcow that doesn't break out rainbow flags and start cheering every time you weirdos state an opinion, or publicly parade your fetishes.
>when are you going to realize that fucking no one wants you here
When are you going to realize that doesn't mean shit on an anonymous imageboard. On top of that your opinion is yours alone. Get over yourself.
>you're not changing anyone's mind
You're so delusional that you think you're changing minds while shitposting on lolcow. I can only imagine how unbearably narcissistic you must be IRL.

No. 467519

>>467513
Isn't this a radfem board? Nobody cares if you're gay or not, just so long as you still act normal.

No. 467522

>>467519 are you the same anon who has been sperging about lc being a radfem site? We have a radfem thread, but this isn't a radfem board goddamn.

No. 467523

>>465459
So much this, pretentious 14 year old twats and 50 year old men who obsess over old as shit sameshit music are the most annoying people on the planet.

No. 467528

>>467512
>put to pasture for saying something against troons

We know its you tranny janny, post the bussy!

No. 467529

It'd be good if employees of a business had the power to vote out a certain boss or supervisor if he was enough of an asshole.
It'd also be good if CEOs had to write daily about their work to justify making the amount of money they do. Their funds should be directly proportional to their hard work and effort for the company itself, and adjusted whenever possible to fit that. Their employees' experience and quality of life at the company should factor in, as well. If they truly deserve what they earn, this should not be difficult.

No. 467542

File: 1569797457195.jpg (57.45 KB, 192x192, 13126.jpg)

>>467529
All of that is already true, for stock holders.Thats what you wanna be.

No. 467543

File: 1569797623161.jpg (36.84 KB, 636x421, billie-eilish-when-the-partys-…)

i'm so fucking sick of billie eilish

but more than her i'm sick of all the adults shilling her music

i'm sick of her being played on radio stations i listen to among music i actually like

she's a teenager who makes music for teenagers. the lyrics suck. i cringe when i hear her songs and i especially cringe seeing grown-ass adults fawn over her or use her stupid lyrics for anything. ugh

No. 467545

>>467512
Why did this anon get put out pasture?
>>467528
hmmmm.jpg

No. 467549

>>467543

She is just a manufactured performer, everything is done by the producers, managers , advertisers and whoever else is investing money to make her a star. There is zero diference between her now and Britney Spears in 1998, she was simply picked to be the new pop startlet of the day.

No. 467550

>>467549
doesn't matter, billie was put in the spotlight at 15 and adults my own age (25-30+) were obsessing over her and i found it strange. britney was older at least and making catchy, harmless songs while billie is out here casually singing about rape and clueless gay fetishization

No. 467552

>>467543
I sincerely hate her style of singing. The hoarse whisper talking is so grating to me, I don't get how she's so popular by that metric alone. That said I feel bad for her for being shilled and manufactured for fame by their shitty stage parents from birth, it sounds like a living hell.

No. 467557

>>467552
>I don't get how she's so popular by that metric alone.

Anything you force enough will get popular. They just have to shill them enough and sell the idea that it is already popular and that alone makes the thing more popular.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mere-exposure_effect


Deezer for example keeps forcing Bad bunny, trap and reggaeton on my player and opening screen by default, little do they know that my hate for those types of music is way too deep so those tactics don't work on me.

No. 467560

>>467552
yeah i don't hate billie herself. more the extremely forced culture and shilling of her. she's a fucking teen, i'm almost 30, her lyrics are vapid and people my age need to stop acting like they enjoy this bullshit. because if they're being serious they look like that "how do you do fellow kids" meme

No. 467565

>>467543
Mainly, her voice doesn't sound any different? Like, it's very generic and bland sounding.

No. 467567

>>467560

I see a lot of younger millenials trying to be a part of zoomer stuff, like Fortnite and Billie Eillish, my peers are terrified of being considered too old that they pretend they "get" this new trends made for teenagers.

No. 467569

>>467350
>bitch you may just be that ugly
this is why no one gives a shit, cares or sympathises if you get catcalled lol

No. 467575

>>467569
I'm pretty sure one anonymous person calling another anonymous person ugly isn't the reason women in general get victim-blamed for men harassing them.

No. 467578

>>467569
Men’s shitty behaviour is women’s fault? Genius.
Are the handmaidens out in full force or are there more boys posting here than usual?

No. 467583

I hate old people. They’re a bunch of ugly, stupid, entitled and whiny pieces of trash who think the world centers around them just because they’re old farts, I truly hope I won’t be as annoying as entitled as them when I’m old. I especially hate the ones who hate small children for little stuff despite them genuinely not knowing better and still somehow being more intelligent than most old people who can’t even figure out how to use a phone.

No. 467593

>>467583
kek, I wonder how our generations are going to be when we're old. Will we adapt better to quickly evolving technology since we grew up adapting to it, or will we bang on about how back in OUR day, smart phones were made out of metal and plastic instead of holograms?

No. 467595

I like white people(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 467599

>>467595
whats with the racebait today

No. 467603

>>467599
I dunno, I thought it was a permaban offense these days.

No. 467607

>>467560
>people my age need to stop acting like they enjoy this bullshit. because if they're being serious they look like that "how do you do fellow kids" meme
NO U

No. 467621

I honestly don't believe feminism will get any better than what it is today. I actually think it will start to get worse and we'll regress in the west back to first wave or even before. Too many women are self hating misogynists who will always put men up on a pedestal, and think being sexy to men is the only important thing in life. And the porn industry is too big and will never go away, and women will only eve be seen as fuck-holes by men, and many women will be perfectly happy with that.(pp derailing )

No. 467624

>>467621
we will never truly be equal unless we completely upheave the patriarchy.

but by doing that we will then create a matriarchy. can we make the sexes equal that way? it's never been done, so who knows. men have subjugated women throughout human history, first by sheer physical force and later through culture.

i try not to give too much of a shit anymore not only because it's pointless but because i firmly believe the human race will be cut down significantly in about 100 years due to climate change. we will run out of fresh water in about 20 years, we will run out of soil to plant crops in in about 50 years. we're fucked.

No. 467632

>>467428
The irony of being a white latino and complaining that blacks and gays have too much media representation in American. Meanwhile in LatAm media, mixed and native latinos only get a fraction of the media representation despite clearly out numbering whites in most countries. If you don't like American media don't fucking watch it then?(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 467642

>>467632

Europeans are prettier than indios.

No. 467643

File: 1569815828977.jpg (37.73 KB, 540x391, original.jpg)


No. 467644

>>467621
I love that the redtext is "pp derailing" for pinkpill posts. I read it as "peepee derailing" and it sounds like you made a male moderator's peepee so mad that he banned you for it. rip peepee

No. 467679

>>467545
Probably because you guys have a fucking containment thread yet still manage to shit up every other thread here and then wonder why you get banned. The quality of the autism. Outsanding.

No. 467691

The mods have said that they aren't trannies countless times. She probably banned that anon because she thought it was a continuation of the "too many blacks and gays in media" autism.

There are thousands of posts that say way worse things about trannies that stay up. Have you ever seen the way tranny mods act on Reddit? There's no way one would have lasted here.

No. 467692

>>467513
Nayrt, but you're the one sperging about how everyone shares your hate boner for gay people. Sounds to me like you're the narcissist kek

Plus, how do you know it's a bunch of other people getting called Homophobe-chan and not just one or two ban-evading autists besides yourself?

It's such a retarded thing to be angry about. Gay people aren't going anywhere. If they bother you, ignore them. You guys act like they're kicking down your door and frotting on your kitchen table, when all they're doing is occasionally acting flamboyant? Fuck's sake. Worry about shit that actually matters.

No. 467784

File: 1569846941224.jpg (112.01 KB, 1100x619, 160420133604-queen-grumpy-hors…)

>>467692
Tfw no hot buff guys are ever coming in to frot on MY dinner table

No. 467819

It is inevitable that any women spaces and movements eventually stop centering women. Because women are a divisive bunch of pussies who self-censor, have too much empathy, too virtuous, and other (socially instilled) traits that will never stop being taken advantage of by non-women.

No. 467832

>>467819
Oh, but it's mostly because we have non-women strong arming their way into our spaces, or have the government impose laws saying it's a crime not to accept non-women as long as they say they IDENTIFY as a woman…but no, u right, it's through no fault but our own..

No. 467835

>>467832
Unrelated but congrats on being the lucky 666th post

No. 467839

>>467692
>you're the one sperging about how everyone shares your hate boner for gay people.
Stop getting your flannel in a twist and reread that post. I didn't do that anywhere. I just pointed out how dumb it is to assume lc is a big online pride parade outside of one anon.
>all they're doing is occasionally acting flamboyant?
No. If you don't care that women and children are being endangered purely to spare hurting LGBT feelings. Then say it and own it. Don't act disingenuous about it.

No. 467858

>>467835
Also unrelated, but i feel so special now

No. 467887

i hate halloween. it's just a meaningless commercial holiday from america/anglo countries and i hate how everyone is excited about doing tacky satan makeup. we do have an actual christian holiday in my country (i think same as hallows eve) but it's overshadowed by fat egirls dressing up as clown/witch/nun/beetlejuice/devil/angel. yawn

No. 467892

>>467887
I grew up with Christmas being shoved down my throat. At least Halloween actually has things that I like even if there's people trying to game attention from it.

No. 467898

>>467892
This is how I feel. Halloween has parties and haunts and lots of good media. Christmas is stressful and expensive and sacharrine media lacking in compelling conflict. Christmas is wonderful as a child but I haven't enjoyed it in years, as soon as I started working I had to start getting presents and my family is fucking huge.

No. 467899

>>467887
agree. i remember, the few times i went out as a child, of how unnatural it felt. it doesn't fit my culture at all, i think.

No. 467902

>>467898
Halloween has always been close to my heart because I love fall and some of my best childhood memories are around halloween time. Also I live in new england and fall is gorg here.

No. 467971

>>467583
fucking thank you. whenever i say this people act like i am the devil incarnate. i work in a library and during week days majority of the people we get are older people. they consistently are the ones to throw temper tantrums when the books they placed on hold aren't ready yet, when a book isn't in brand new condition, or if they have to wait for ny times bestseller books that have tons of other people above them on the wait list. i get it, your on borrowed time, but chill the fuck out. for every cool old person there are 20 shitty ones

No. 467972

>>467892
I'm not a fan of Christmas either. i grew around rich kids who always seemed to have to best fairytale Christmases, so I felt like mine was lacking in comparison. Probably because I associated Christmas with materialism and not family. On Halloween you just go out and get candy for free with your friends. Loved that shit as a kid. Also I don't like winter, so there's that.

No. 467975

>>467972
My parents were pretty middle class but I hate it for the same reason. It just reminds me of my mom's phony self and her materialism. She always got super gifty around that time of year but would scorekeep and be shitty for the rest, and it irked me that she operated that way when she was supposed to be religious. My entire childhood was proving how I wasn't an ungrateful brat for the gifts at Christmas even in July.
Some thematics about Christmas I find really cozy, like a lit tree in a dim room and baking pastries. But leading up to that, the holiday crunch is an absolute terror. Sickening how the most moralfag time of year can at the same time have the worst cases of inhumanity and entitlement. It doesn't help that I've worked in industries where customers literally trounce over employees to get their way. People become savages when it comes to procuring material things, or really anything that threatens their perfect holiday.

Halloween definitely doesn't have that aspect and I hope it never does.

No. 467978

>>467583
To be fair, I think everyone hates old people, people others consider to be "old people" in comparison to themselves. I can't wait until that day in the future where every human being that's 55+ right now, dies.

No. 467985

>>467832
Honestly it's partially because there are a large amount of women in the movement who have accepted it. Like that anon said a lot of them have too much empathy, try hard to be too understanding and accepting, that others perceive that as weakness and take advantage of it. That's how it always it. With scrotes it never pays to be overly caring and nice.

No. 467986

>>467887
I hate how the shops around here bring in Halloween merch when absolutely no one here celebrates it, all the tacky shit just goes straight into landfill on November 1st because no one fucking bought it and I doubt they ever will

Honestly I just hate how prominent americanisation is globally, who the fuck cares about an American holiday when we’re not American

No. 467989

>>467978
should we hate ourselves when we get old too? I hate the politics of boomers too but damn..

No. 467991

>>467839
Don't blame gay people. >>467832 put it really nicely. Maybe you should have read that before posting.

Also, I like that you imply that not hating gay people automatically means a person is lesbian. Real classy.

You don't actually give a fuck about women and children. You just want an excuse to feel better than other people lol

No. 467993

>>467986

I like it, horror movies, spooky stuff, is fun, all national holidays here are jingoistic trash anyways. Its either the birth of a caudillo or some religious anacronistic tribal dance thingy tourist trap no one really cares about.

No. 467994

>>467989
NTA but the younger generation will most certainly hate us, and when they’re old the youngest generation will hate them in turn. It’s a cycle, old people remind us that youth isn’t forever

No. 467995

wish farmers weren't typically assuming that because they love cunnilingus and get off on nothing else, that means all women whose sexual lives don't line up with theirs are fakers and liars and traitors.

some chicks love piv and sucking dick, and some girls even don't enjoy cunnilingus as much, and just because that's not your experience doesn't mean someone is lying lol

No. 467996

>>467995
Idek why you guys go into the Pink Pill thread if you can't help but apply everything to yourself or apply everything on an individual basis and be personally offended by general statements. The criticisms made in Pink Pill are generalities. The whole purpose is to comment on general trends and no one even said women who feel differently are traitors. You guys are always reaching to be offended.

No. 467998

>>467972
All of this, I'm not American but Halloween always felt like what e wanted Christmas to actually be. A time I can plan something nice with friends, unlike Christmas which is just a endless barrage of expenses and family drama that haunts you from September until February. There was a nice window of time where I saw more friends at Christmas who were avoiding blog family situations too and it was starting to feel comfy, but that will change when people start getting married and having kids.
Christmas is meant to make you feel thankful but it just reminds me that I'm poor and don't have a real family.

I used to be excited when I saw seasonal Halloween goods because it was a rare thing but now every shop is churning out plastic tat like >>467986 said. I used to hold onto my decorations and use them all year round but recently with each year I can feel the commercial pressure to conduct building and I hate it



>>467975
Too late, Halloween is becoming even more commercial each year

No. 467999

>>467995
Jesus christ can you get thicker skin? Stop being so mortally offended by people questioning and discussing possibilities you don't feel apply to your situation. If you were really so confident in your position, you wouldn't be so buttmad at people criticizing it.

The PIV talk is boring as hell but it would have ended long ago if not for your type who can't just let it go.

No. 468005

>>465459
true beatles are shit also they all fuckin ugly

No. 468011

>>467887
I don't know if I'm just getting older but where I am it seems to be dying out. Each year I see fewer pumpkins and house decorations, fewer trick or treaters at my door, and fewer people in costumes.

No. 468013

Kanye West makes the best rap music since Tupac

Black Americans lost their mojo for creating innovative musical genres since Destiny's Child and Beyonce & 50 Cent and the other post-gangsta rap rappers took over what was meant to be black music

Black Americans reject their old music too much and it makes me sad when non-Black Americans appreciate Disco & Funk much more than young Black Americans do

The focus on rap and sampling killed creativity

No. 468016

>>467832
That doesn't change her point much, really.
Troons are utterly insignificant as a voting block on their own so we only get laws imposing their insanity because people, mainly women, generally support them. Because people, mainly women, don't want to be seen as bigots.

No. 468019

>>467995
Pick your hills to die on wisely.
I personally don't agree with the anons posting about it but they're free to discuss it. I feel satisfied over decent PIV. I feel like what they're saying doesn't really apply to me.
I just choose not to enter that particular conversation, that way I don't have to lie or cause a ruckus over what I personally get off on.

No. 468024

>>467994
IDK about you, but I mainly hate old people because of their archaic viewpoints. Why even deny things like climate change at this point?

No. 468037

>>468024
>Why even deny things like climate change at this point?

All of the bullet points about climate change come from boomers and all of the solutions (not to say the causes and general assesment of the reality of climate change) people like Al Gore shills are wrong and are only convenient for certain corporate interests. Also, wind and solar don't work, nuclear is the way but most climate cultists are against it and are only in favor of carbon taxes that hurt people and solve nothing.

zoomers like Greta are only parroting stuff that 60yr old hippies were already shilling and is a misguided lobby.

No. 468038

>>468011
I think it's more tha Halloween is moving to more private spaces. Things like trick or treating at the mall, trunk or treat, and big professional productions (like haunts, clubs and stuff) means there is less of an expression of community based Halloween events.

No. 468054

>>468037
Are you even real? What kinds of science do you selectively believe?

No. 468058

>>468037
solar and wind do work in specific regions, and honestly hydroeletrics are the way not nuclear

No. 468069

>>468054

The science from a 16 yr old asspie dropout, obviously. Thats the only true science i buy into.

No. 468074

slightly related to the "current" convo but i hate greta, not because of anything other than she's 16. 16 year olds are essentially retarded. she might be a nice person but any 16 year old is going to be naive enough to think they can affect anything.

No. 468078

>>468074
Spring boarding off of this, child prodigies fuck me off. I hate the way adults treat them and how egotistical the kids inevitably become by the time they’re a young adult

No. 468082

>>468069
You realise she is simply repeating what actual climate scientists have been claiming for years?
It’s not just something she whipped up from a Facebook post like 90% of the shit climate change deniers gobble up.

No. 468086

>>467543
it's weird that she has this tomboy image but her songs have lyrics like "i'll seduce your dad" i don't get it

No. 468087

File: 1569915152155.jpg (8.98 KB, 225x225, images80'¿.jpg)

>>468082

Thats rite, i am buying carbon credits as we speak, no need to thank me, i'll just be here saving the world for Greta's future

No. 468088

>>468087
see, this is what bothered me about her. she's fucking 16 so her entire platform is going to be "woe is me abloobloobloo" with her wikipedia-tier knowledge and her lack of experience in life, she's just so fucking annoying.

No. 468089

>>468037
It's time for you to stop sniffing paint.

No. 468091

File: 1569915865380.jpeg (121.34 KB, 1920x1080, 1 3x4S5ZLLRoImQH0KEqrJ-A.jpeg)

>>468088

I can't wait to have the living shit taxed out of me with no meaningful repercussion to the environment and no aggregated value to my life whatsoever, who could say no to such a brave and inspiring young girl! here government cronies! just take it all! for science! do it now or the world will literally fucking mega ultra explode in like 3 seconds, tax me nao!

No. 468094

>>468088
Your concern is critiquing how a 16 year old responds to the serious wrongdoings of the older generations. It's like ignoring an abusive parent who is slowly poisoning their child and instead blaming the child for being upset. Are you a boomer?

No. 468098

>>468094
nah fam, my concern with her is that people are giving a 16 year old a platform to speak on something that she has the same sources to understand as anyone else. 16 year olds are terrible in general, but she's got a chip on her shoulder about something that she can't affect. as for climate change. no shit it's real, but i cannot affect climate change so my opinion doesn't matter in a grand scale and there's nothing the consumer can really do anyway, let alone one singular consumer.

No. 468099

>>468074
The thing that bothers me the most about her is that she's diagnosed with OCD and asperger's which obviously affects her sense of judgement, ability to control her emotions and tendency to be neurotic. Someone like this should absolutely not be pushed to the limelight to act as some sort of a cult leader, it's definitely going to fuck her up even more. Her speeches are definitely written by other people beforehand.

I'm worried of her being exploited and used as a political tool. Her mother, Malena Ernman, is a washed up celebrity and I wouldn't put it beyond her to have groomed Greta to be a cash cow to sell her book which ~conveniently~ came out just now and is only milking their family drama and Greta's publicity. They completely threw a 16 year old, mentally unstable girl under the bus when they made her the face of the environmental movement people can direct their hate towards, and in return people can dismiss all criticism as people bullying a helpless minor. She was the easiest target to take advantage of.

No. 468101

>>468091
>>468098
Have you actually listened to anything she says? She's never said you as an individual need to do anything or need to be taxed which is why she's talking to world leaders and not random dipshits on the street telling them to use cardboard straws.

No. 468111

>>468088
Exactly. I don't know who she is supposed to appeal to. Children are retarded. Why the fuck would you choose a retard as your mouthpiece?

I've not listened to any of her speeches, or read any articles about her. I'm not going to either. If the people backing her wanted their message ignored they've done a great job.

No. 468117

>>468111
>I've not listened to any of her speeches, or read any articles about her.

then why tf are you talking

No. 468120

Millie Bobbie Brown is unfortunate looking and her only appeal is her age to pedophiles. She would be completely ignored if she was said she was in her 20s

No. 468122

>giving a 16 year old a platform to speak on something that she has the same sources to understand as anyone else
Isn't that exactly her point though? I'm not a fan of her myself but iir her last big engagement she said the government needed to be listening to actual scientists, not herself as a sixteen year old.

No. 468140

The internet doesn't answer all your questions. Yes it's better than the past, but if you start googling non normie questions you'll either get paywalled, find nothing, or be linked to a text book. If you're in a field that attracts a lot of hobbyist, art music animation, all the top viewed articles/videos on those subjects will always be puddle deep. For some subjects text books are better than the internet. For reason all the online resources for animation just regurgitate 12 rules of animators and never go deeper. If you want any good videos on animation they're all obscure as fuck less then 1.5 k views type videos

No. 468156

>>468117
Was two lines of text too much for your pitiful reading comprehension to handle?

No. 468157

>>468078
If it makes you feel any better, the majority of the time they believe their own hype, stop pushing as hard, and end up as total losers. Even the ones that don't are still usually social pariahs since spending all your time on mastering a pursuit means there's little of it leftover for normal kid activities and normal kid socialization. A girl I know used to be a Spelling Champion, and the only friends she had were ones from competitions.

No. 468170

>>468140
I wrote a paper in college on something that I couldn't find anywhere online at the time, not even in the wikis of the people and company involved in the scandal (Cadbury choco and African slaves farming their cacao). All just textbook and physical archives. It really humbles you about how not-so-big the internet actually is and how much stuff is in books that hasn't been copied onto the web yet.

No. 468187

joint custody, especially the 50/50 custody bullshit, is more for the benefit of the parents (and lets face it, usually the father) instead of benefits to the child. why tf is it good for a kid to be dragged between houses and not have a stable home. everytime i heard one of my friends who lived like that talk about it, they always said "my moms house" and "my dads house", it was never "my house". its like they never had a home of their own. it would be better if the better more stable parent, (not to bait, but that is usually the mother), had primary custody and the other parent had visitation, which would allow the kid to have a stable home instead of this 50/50 shite.

No. 468192

>>468187
Imo the kid should choose. Usually children prefer being with mother especially since so many American men have anger issues and don't bond with their children. The whole 50/50 thing is because men are asshurt they can't control the woman or their kids. Men's true colors always show in court

No. 468193

>>468187
i disagree with you on all fronts. this is just a wrong opinion.

No. 468194

>>468192
Or they'll choose whichever parent buys them the most presents.

No. 468196

>>468192
Fuck off to the PP thread with this.

No. 468199

>>468187
Men frequently only claim this to lower their child support amount, and the qualification for it can be such bullshit. In my state, what qualified as 50/50 and turned child support into a pittance was fucking laughable, they can be with them like less than half the year (like 100 overnights) and the man can say it's 50/50. Men frequently start asking for more visits and overnights to qualify for this only to fuck off when the amount is lowered.

I went thru hell with an ex husband that tried to claim this bullshit and sicced a horrible motherfucker of a lawyer on me even though said ex was not paying any amount of cs at all for awhile and only saw the kid every other weekend.

When men talk about "getting fucked over" it's because normal ass things like child support are making them immensely butthurt. I'm working up to moving away and signing off that he doesn't even have to pay it anymore if he just allows me to move with our child and draw up a visitation agreement without dragging me to court to move on with my life. It's not worth it. Would rather be independent financially and never have to worry about what dumb bullshit the Disneyland Daddy who doesn't care about the hard parts of parenting and is less involved than my ldr partner is going to whine about being my fault next.

No. 468219

File: 1569956894726.jpg (6.22 KB, 250x244, 1569715712560s.jpg)

>>468094
>serious wrongdoings of the older generations

Yes, yes, corporations and governments tried to warn us for decades that it was us all along, but we didn't listen!!! we still used the plastic straws and didn't turn off the faucet when we brushed our teeth, now its too late, i can see the carbon dioxide with my own eyes aaaaah it buurns, it buuuurns , tax me, tax me quiclkly, tax me now, i want to be poorer and give all my money to bureucrats, we the people are guilty for 99999.9999 emissions just because we exist, why can't we be green like international industries and governments?, save us from ourselves UN daddies ahhhhh saint Greta atone for my sins, hit me with those carbon cryptos you are selling else the world with end exactly 1 year from now at 3 pm standard time.

No. 468223

>>468219
Literally retarded

No. 468227

>>468037
Did you ever leave your room during summer or late spring this year? In my country during summer, the weather changed between 27° heat and literal fucking hail in a matter of 3-4 days, several times. I never encountered shit like this in 25 years of my life and I wish it wasn't real but it's hard to deny at this point.

No. 468228


No. 468234

File: 1569960298259.gif (1.21 MB, 350x263, soraya.gif)

>>468227

If only i was so careful with the environment as international industrial complexes and governments. But no, i had to use plastic bags instead of canvas, i deserve the environments wrath, death by carbon taxes should be my natural punishment , mr Banker pretty please loan me money at high interest rates so i can buy an overprice electric car before the world burst into flames and we the sinners all turn into salt.

No. 468239

File: 1569960852110.png (14.95 KB, 86x100, 8b407e854307f4045a4dfdf3ea7629…)

>>468234
NTAYRT, but the funny part is people like you who are clearly got a nerve hit in the Greta thunberg fuckery and parody it in such a ironic self aware way xD but don't say shit when extremely pressing harmful agendas or ideologies are pushed down your throats. Ah no, you just feel annoyed about being preached to by a shouting autistic 16 year old kid I guess.

But keep doing the good fight by saying what everyone plainly knows!(xD)

No. 468241

File: 1569961344047.jpg (466.69 KB, 1024x683, 1569870996210.jpg)

>>468239

Yes anon, indeed, other shitty agendas exist, that means i can't criticize Greta's for being shitty. Pls no bully.

No. 468251

>>468091
How would regulating fossil fuel companies involve taxing ordinary citizens? For fuck's sake, read a book.

No. 468258

>>468251
They'll just pass on all the extra regulation costs to consumers, hitting poorer ones the hardest.

No. 468278

>>468234
EBIN XDDDDDD FUG OUR CLIMATE ITZ ALL CONSBIRACY BY (((((LEFTIST)))))))ILLUMINATI
Are you aware you can still dislike elites trying to milk money out of it without denying the climate change?

No. 468282

File: 1569966278030.png (192.22 KB, 291x383, autismgirl.PNG)

IF YOU EAT MEAT YOU HATE AUTISTIC PEOPLE

No. 468283

>>468187
I don't get you at all.
Kids don't say "my mom's house" because they don't feel like it's their own home, they say it to be clear because they have two homes it's not that complex.
Also, so what if it's for the benefit of the parents? It's hard to raise a kid, coparenting is better than single parenting or forcing a kid to live in a loveless home with parents that "stay together for the kids".
Also about your idea of kids staying with the most stable parent? That just makes them feel abandoned, kids don't recognise if a parent is a bad parent and usually they will want to stay with the one that doesn't give them a curfew and feeds them dominos every night. I'd rather get to see some of a shit patent and grow up to appreciate the good one than be torn away from the bad one for whatever reason.

No. 468284

File: 1569966477169.png (268.47 KB, 442x398, autismgirl.PNG)

The funny thing is China, Africa, and India are actually stealing this girl's future. If she convinces westerners to live in bubbles, have no kids, and eat maggot meat she's helping them.

No. 468286

>>468282
Why do people like you always turn it up to 100 when criticized? Is it because roaches live the longest?

No. 468289

>>468219
I know how badly you want to circlejerk and all, but what I said is true. Older generations have failed to fight for Earth, and ultimately failed to stop the corporations. I will admit it's difficult to stop rich corporarions, but what amazes and disgusts me (as well as 16 year olds) is that most boomers don't even care about climate change. You can play this nothing matters game but ultimately you're part of the problem. If we all cared enough we could pressure our government to regulate. Younger generations are born into this world where everyone's given up and everyone pretends they have no power at all. Of course they're angry.

No. 468292

>>468289
>most boomers don't even care about climate change
They all do. It's largely their push. Remember Al Gore and Futurama? They're constantly trying to guilt you as if it will somehow stop pollution if you only give money to the IPCC.

No. 468293

>>468289
>most boomers don't even care about climate change
They all do. It's largely their push. Remember Al Gore and Futurama? They're constantly trying to guilt you as if it will somehow stop pollution if you only give money to the IPCC.

No. 468294

>>468284
Unironically saying this without understanding that Western countries meet more goals by trading with the countries mentioned so that they do the polluting instead.

In short, everyone sucks here, having actually listened to what the girl is saying seems she's pretty pissed at that and wants everyone to change.

Fat stupid Americans and their demand for shit is just the more easy thing to call out

No. 468299

>>468294
>having actually listened to what the girl is saying
lmao
>Western countries meet more goals by trading with the countries mentioned
Sure because they want to keep selling big max to your drag kidz. Maybe your nonbinary spawntype should dye its hair blue too. 25 dollars in a tube. All xyms fr*ends should have instagram accounts where they twerk in front of burger kween. Get a beyblade tattoo because that's so ironic and it only costs 50 bucks an hour. Get a cricket dorito tattoo. We're going to save the world by living in a 5g hut. Shut the fuck up.

No. 468306

>>468299
Are you schizophrenic or just retarded, no one said shit about any of the nonsense you're on about.

No. 468307

>>468284
this girl barely had a future.

No. 468310

>>468306
Do you have aspergers? Can you read between lines?

No. 468311

>>468140
All textbooks need to be public domain already. Jk that will never happen.

No. 468313

>>468311
Everyone who writes textbooks are straight R words.

No. 468314

>>468310
No, I'm just intelligent enough to realize nothing you're going on about has to do with anything and is low quality bait. So I guess retarded is the answer.

No. 468315

>>468310
NTA but you're the only sperg here

No. 468316

>>468314
So you don't understand but you'll act angry anyway.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 468323

>>468289
>pressure our government to regulate

Oh yes, wouldn't a bunch of bureaucrat cronies loved that amount of self flagellation by the populace. It all gets solved if we go full retard and give the government total control over everything, nothing can go wrong, jut give them the whole economy dude, if they fuck us over we can always take it back from the military.

No. 468415

I don't get how a "drug culture" is a thing honestly and how people so willingly induce and poison themselves with substances that almost always do more harm than good, especially with the after effects. I'm not talking about drug addicts but retards who go to parties and shit and think it's cool to take stuff that can kill them. Call me a prude, I don't care, I just don't understand it at all.

No. 468418

>>468415
I'm not part of the culture, but you fail to consider how plenty drugs have good effects and plenty drugs are used responsibly. Not all drugs are bad. I guess, what do you not understand about that?

No. 468419

>>468415
Surely you can see the massive difference between types of drugs… like there are some you'd have to be crazy to try because of how dangerous/addictive they are, and some that won't have any lasting effect on you at all according to both studies and common sense. Lumping them all together like some automatic life ruining monolith does not lend your opinion any credibility.

I don't do drugs or plan to start because I won't even take the tiniest risk of hurting myself, getting into bad situations, overindulging to the point of wasting my money, etc. But it's very easy to understand why a lot of people would value a fun time over being maybe a bit overly cautious like I am.

No. 468422

>>468258
…which will cause people to patronize other companies. Green energy companies.

I thought Republicans were supposed to be experts on the whole free-market thing?

>>468282
>>468284
This is a child. You can't post children here.

Also, sage your shitposts.

No. 468423

>>468422
nta but you can post 16+ just not full names unless names are public anyway sooooo.

No. 468424

File: 1569996491790.jpg (87.37 KB, 1024x899, 1567954150114.jpg)

>>468422
>You can't post children here.

And yet she is old enough to lecture on the UN and to appear on every single platform ever.

No. 468426


No. 468428

>>468426

she is not , she is 16, she just look 13 because she has downs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greta_Thunberg

No. 468429

>>468428

She has aspergers not downs

No. 468433

>>468422
>I thought Republicans were supposed to be experts on the whole free-market thing?
If prices are being artificially manipulated by outside by outside regulations then it isn't a free market.
You're also assuming people can even afford to patronize others. Again, I bring up the poor. Aren't Democrats supposed to care about the people poor? I'm already hearing horror stories of old retired women freezing to death in winter for being made unable to pay for electricity that was previously dirt cheap.

No. 468434

File: 1569999052700.jpg (16.41 KB, 210x267, tropic-thunder-simple-jack.jpg)

>>468429

potatoe, potato.

No. 468435

File: 1569999857541.jpg (31.08 KB, 660x371, _103330503_musk3.jpg)

>>468433

But electricity is the future anon, this guy needs all the subsidies he can get.

>old retired women freezing to death in winter


That means they are not using electricity and by being death their have reduced their carbon reducing their carbon footprint to a minimum, regulations do work.

That leaves valuable resources to the progressive people who need it the most, rich liberals with Teslas

No. 468436

Dunno if this is an unpopular opinion but fuck it, it is insane how many people are stupidly butthurt over a 16 year old girl talking at the UN. Like yeah you don't have to agree with her or anything but damn, did you cross a fucking ocean in a boat just to make a point? That's more bad ass than any of the dipshit edge lords endlessly sperging about a sperg. I wish people would shut the fuck up and stop wishing violence on her and being terrible to her already.

If you wanna make some kinda point about how climate change should be addressed or not maybe leave your edgelord out of it.

No. 468437

>>468435
I don't know why I read that in a Ron Swanson voice, but for some reason I did, and that made no sense at all.

Eh, at least this might solve Europe's allegedly non-existent migration problem. They could let in every unvetted rapist on the planet, wait until first snowfall, and then bulldoze their frozen corpses into a makeshift wall.

No. 468438

I think people don't realize exactly how vulnerable they are to internet bullshit. The "Walk away from the screen hahahaha" thing isn't really legitimate anymore. I feel like someone could easily train a neural network to act out political arguments online, and people would think it's two organic humans fighting.
The danger in that concept is how easily it could be used for propaganda.
Like, what's stopping someone from buying a bunch of old, inactive Twitter accounts, making profile pictures for them with thispersondoesnotexist for half, using existing cartoon/anime/furry/celebrity pictures for the other half, throwing in some "relatable", "casual" Tweets (also generated) to look legit, and creating entire political narratives that just aren't real?
It can easily become "The leftists are doing this now, so those of you leaning on the right must do that" (or vice-versa) when no one's actually doing anything, and a large chunk of people will follow like lemmings.
I wouldn't even really be surprised to find out some of the spergy political arguments in here where the exact same opinions, almost word-for-word, seem to be spewed out are just bot posts strewn all over multiple imageboards for training purposes.

No. 468439

File: 1570001260022.jpg (10.03 KB, 262x275, 1537396204343.jpg)

>>468437

Ron Swanson is goals hubby material

No. 468441

>>468436
Same. I don't really feel one way or the other about her public speaking (I'm convinced it's too late for the human race), but I can't fathom grown-ass men and women being hateful toward some teen they don't even know, and who hasn't said or done anything to hurt people.
It's like they have brain worms or something. I want to call it Thunberg derangement syndrome.

No. 468446

>>468438
In nerd circles people make bot versions of their own accounts for fun, and they are often passable as real accounts, also replying to real accounts. That part is pretty easy to do. Bots only go wrong when they use too many sources to draw content from.

No. 468447

>>468438
Also the rest of your post: absolutely happens all over Twitter already, and is likely why there is so much political shadowbanning happening there. There are huge followtrains of fake and semi-fake accounts created to promote particular narratives.

No. 468450

>>468438

whenever the government of my county announces something or is being publicly criticized there are hundreds of thousands of bots that come to force trending topics or to the rescue , journalist have located a shit ton of them in Turkey who is an allied country. Its actually old news, but that doesn't mean everyone who disagrees with you is an NPC.

>>468441

The whole reason the lobby behind her is choosing a 16 yr old who looks 12 as a spokeperson is exactly that, to shield criticism and as a diversion tactic. "how could this people be against a literal precious child with asperger" Its a very cynical media tactic that should backfire. Maybe they can try with a very sweet old lady who bakes vegan cookies next time.

No. 468451

>>468419
Hm well maybe I didn't word it right when I say I don't understand cause I do. I guess I'm just too aware of how much drugs can destroy a person's life's. I'm not exactly against any type of drug taking or experimenting but it makes me very uneasy when people glorify or celebrate drugs as something just fun and cool and then a blind eye to the horrific and harmful shit that comes with it. I just don't like that aspect of it

No. 468452

File: 1570005753645.jpg (160.12 KB, 1601x1000, ron.jpg)

>>468435
Goals are for alcoholics and pretend football players. In America, aim for touchdowns.

No. 468456

File: 1570007403944.jpg (Spoiler Image, 50.46 KB, 826x670, 7pnjxv524up31.jpg)

>>468450
The issue isn't with the criticism, it's with freaks who make shit like pic related, call her a bitch, retarded, etc.
This isn't valid criticism of the things she's saying, lmao, and neither are the violent fantasies or other putrid things they say.

No. 468462

File: 1570009185177.jpg (43.83 KB, 600x600, 2344679_0.jpg)

>>468456

Maybe lobbies should not use underage children as cannon fodder for their controversial viral political campaigns. Of course it backfires. Blame her handlers.

No. 468463

>>468462
>it’s not degenerates fault for being degenerate!

No. 468465

>>468462
Maybe take responsibility for your own comments and choices for once in your life instead of just blaming the TV.

No. 468471

File: 1570010532456.jpg (43.14 KB, 635x635, 25395821_1847186492239806_4390…)

>>468463

both the vitriol and your kind of response is why she was chosen. It literally the responsibility of her handlers and legal custodians to care for the wellbeing of their legally underage mentally challenged kid rather than put her in a spotlight where she doesn't belong, speaking about issues where she has no authority in melodramatic ways and later expect the internet of all places to play nice. They are doing with her the same thing they are doing with Desmond, is exploitative, difference is she would have a profitable career in shilling as long as she plays ball while Desmond would probably be found death by hanging or overdose before coming of age.

No. 468472

>>468471
>expect the internet of all places to play nice
You say this as though it’s some sort of foreign entity, it’s made up of people, and people should always be shamed and held accountable for their actions when they as adults decide to sexualise children (as was done in anons example). The internet isn’t some sort of safe space to be a degenerate, children being in the spotlight in no way justifies any abuse being hurled at them, and while I agree that her parents should’ve been more responsible that still doesn’t make adults being absolute shitheads towards a kid okay. It’s basic human empathy to not prey on those younger and/or weaker than yourself.

No. 468474

>>468438
On the PBS special about Prince Such and Such (the semi cute Saudi prince who killed the journalist) they mention manipulation of the twittersphere in Saudi by just some bots and a hashtag. It would give false impressions.

It was a great special but it was on too late at night and I missed half.

No. 468475

>>468472
Couldn't have said it better myself. I'm tired of adults babying themselves and each other just because they're on a computer.
You still have a functioning brain while you're using that keyboard. Have some decency. If you won't, the correct thing is for everyone else to accordingly call you out on disgusting behavior.

No. 468477

>>468436
My thoughts exactly.

How dare this teenage girl care about the fucking planet she has to live on for the next seventy years! How outlandish, she must be a liberal plant! And also have eight different mental disabilities! We better bully her and threaten her with rape and violence!

Is it really that hard to believe that a teenage girl just cares about polar bears? I mean geez I understand disagreeing with her, but your autism must be way worse than her's if you think your screeching is necessary.

>>468435
This anon sperging about how much she hates gay people, renewable energy, [redacted] people, and dA lIbErUl CoNsPiRaCiEs in every /ot/ thread is really getting old. I mean geez this is just as obnoxious as the radfem sperging.

We can tell you're the same person, anon. You type like an ESL fourth grader, you never sage, and you think EVERY post needs a ten-year-old reaction image or some shit you stole off /pol/. Learn to integrate, for fuck's sake.

No. 468485

so unpopular opinion but ive been reading up on the mumkey jones/liu the kitty scandal and i don't think she's a pedophile or an ephebophile. she seems literally developmentally handicapped, didn't appear to get off on the fact that he was 15, and honestly, the 15 year old is more emotionally developed and mature than she is. he doesn't look 15, either. i just don't think she's a pedophile.

another unpopular opinion but i don't think older women always wield the power that people think they do over younger men or younger boys. a 26 year old teacher and a 14 year old boy? obviously, but honestly, teenage boys are already filled to the brim with male sexual entitlement and predatory behavior that i think a 17 yo boy and a 22 year old girl are dealing with the same levels of self assuredness so i don't think it's necessarily the same kind of exploitative arrangement that would be going on with a 22 yo man and a 17 yo girl. a 16 year old girl is way easier to take advantage of than a 16 year old boy and a 16 year old girl doesn't have male entitlement and isn't given the same kind of "this is your domain" from birth that boys are given, so i think it really complicates the issue if you want to look at it realistically. i think it's generally harder to take advantage of younger guys because they grow up with entitlement and confidence that girls and women don't have, so i don't even think some of these cases are really "taking advantage" of younger guys, if you think about it.

No. 468486

>>468484
Don't girls mature faster? That a 16 yr old boy is mentally the equivalent of a 14 yr old girl would imply it's even grottier to be predatory towards them.

No. 468489

>>468486
"girls mature faster" seems to mostly have to do with the fact that girls are less impulsive, but that really doesn't have all that much to do with age gaps and exploitation. it also sounds like an excuse to baby guys for forever while holding girls and women to task for everything, even stuff men are actually culpable for, as people have done throughout history.

No. 468501

>>468489
Having taught kids before, girls definitely mature faster, but not how most people think. Girls become independent faster than boys do and resist authority (not in a disruptive way, but girls are less likely to allow an adult to dictate how they should do something), they also become better at self-regulating their emotions and behaviours significantly faster than boys do. Girls also tend to fall into leadership roles and can navigate through many different social groups.

It’s depressing that all of these positive traits get stamped out through socialisation as they progress through school.

No. 468503

>>468489
We have a pink pill thread, you know. What more impulsive implies is easier to take advantage of. Men shouldn't take advantage of immature girls, and women shouldn't taken advantage of immature, impulsive boys. Mature adults should deal with mature adults, and immature ones should get get their shit together.

No. 468505

>>468485
Agreed. The boy she was fucking was a full length adult and Liu is an actual retard. It's creepy and unsettling, sure, but calling it pedophilia just because the boy was 3 years away from the legal age is reaching. I think people just want to exaggerate it because they hate Mumkey for what an egoistical dick he is.

Also agree about the power dynamics. An adult male will ALWAYS have way more control over a young girl than an adult woman has over a young boy. Both physically and mentally. I'm not saying you should dismiss a 20something year old woman fucking a 15 year old boy like it was nothing but it's not at all comparable if the genders were switched around. At 15-17 the boy is 100% likely to be able to physically overpower the woman and the society is built around young men being socialized to be more assertive and self-sufficient than young women.

No. 468506

I find the recent fashion of clawlike nails disgusting.

No. 468508

>>468503
this was about an unpopular opinion, which is admittedly unpopular.

>What more impulsive implies is easier to take advantage of

wtf, no it doesn't. a 23 year old guy is still more impulsive than most 17 year old girls, does that mean 17 year old girls are taking advantage of 23 year old guys?

what you're saying is just not true as men are still very impulsive, far more so than women ever tend to be. being a less impulsive child doesn't mean you're actually mature, it doesn't mean you make the right decisions or think critically, it just means you're less prone to making rash decisions. doesn't mean you make the right decisions, it just means you don't jump to act immediately. boys raised on violent porn and porn where women are submissive, where women older than them are seen as submissive, that believe women older than them are wrong and are less intelligent than they are, less worthy than they are, and raised by movies to believe they should be given whatever they want and that believe they are always gifted and more intelligent than women, are not going to be as easily manipulated and insecure and easily led as teenage girls.

there's a reason why we see 16 year old boys victimizing 16 year old girls but not the opposite. they're already filled with predatory behavior and entitlement by the time they're in their early to mid teens. they're already coercing their same age girlfriends to engage in violent and depraved acts. the "more mature" 16 year old girls aren't the ones asking for this shit.

>>468505
idk about full length adult in reality, but based on what we could see, he definitely was more composed than every 22 year old guy i've met, which is really sad. he seemed like a pretty mature kid and she is for sure an actual retard that is below him. no joke, i really think she's disabled in some way. i think it's just retribution for men being called out for actually being predatory. there didn't seem to be any predation on her behalf there. she needs to be heavily medicated though.

No. 468518

There's no excuse for a mesh top to be over $8.

No. 468526

I wish bushes and body hair in general made a comeback

No. 468528

>>468506
>recent fashion

No. 468563

>>468526
Bushes are making a comeback, all over body hair not so much mostly because it makes peoples skin more softer feeling and most people like soft feeling

No. 468584

>>468501
Girls definitely mature faster, in the sense of maturing physically. I was just thinking about this yesterday. Late elementary school and middle school is when most girls start their period and develop bigger breasts. Late middle school and high school is when most boys start growing facial hair and their voice begins to drop. I think those physical changes in young girls can definitely make them "mature" due to the fact they now have some things to worry about they commonly associated as being adult, periods, shaving, wearing bras.
Sort of OT but why are young girls shoes sizes so limited? They stop at size 5 out here and I had to start shopping for bigger shoes in the adult women's section before I even entered 4th grade. I felt so left out, I wanted to wear the cool character shoes for a longer time.

No. 468606

>>468472
>It’s basic human empathy to not prey on those younger and/or weaker than yourself.

That is what her handlers are counting on, put a retarded kid who looks 12 in the spotlight, bait the controversy, then everyone who disagrees can easily be call a degenerate. What a joke.

>>468477

>No unpopular opinions in the unpopular opinion thread reeee

>everyone who doesn't think like me is the same person

No. 468610

>>468584
I had to do the same thing and it sucked! I think it might be more profitable to make adult shoes in a large range of sizes because there are more small-footed adults than big-footed kids and adult shoes = $$. Life sucks.

No. 468648

>>468606
If you’re incapable of criticising someone without resorting to shitty memes about how they need a good dicking then I think it’s time to look into a tard wrangler for yourself

No. 468692

>>468606
You're not just doing it in this thread, though. You've been shitting up other threads too, like when an anon asked for feminist reading and you replied with a bunch of irrelevant books about economics in Latam.

You've expressed your retarded opinion, now move on. Go jerk off to Nick Offerman, who is liberal JSYK.

No. 468758

People who always put animals above other humans are just edgelords who aren't empathetic. If "humans are shit" then you're part of the reason why, dumbass. Lmao.

No. 468759

>>468606
We've been over this. >>468456 is degenerate. If that is how you "disagree", you seriously have problems, and no one is wrong in pointing that out. Not everything is an "evil plot by the handlers!!1", just stop being a disgusting piece of shit.

No. 468761

>>468758
How many times are we going to have this opinion posted

No. 468762

>>468759
Even if it is a plot by handlers, does that automatically relieve Anon of the responsibility of being a good and virtuous person?

It's seriously hard to believe that just because this child's guardians have failed her, that they too are allowed to slip into degeneracy and meaningless hate.

>>468606
In short, you are a wickedly degenerate and irresponsible person. I sincerely hope you can distance yourself from your childish morality and views right now and grow to be better.

No. 468768

>>468761
Has it been? I've never seen it but I don't browse this thread often, sooo..

No. 468775

File: 1570099937479.gif (4.98 MB, 320x248, giphy-downsized-large.gif)

>>468768
>This thread in a nutshell

Basically, if it's an "unpopular opinion" that's actually just a popular, oft-unsaid opinion, it's been posted. Especially if it's something about vegans lol

No. 468805

Julia Vickerman is kind of weird, but it's not really that deep or as bad as some people are saying.
Most of the people coming down on her like she's the female John Wayne Gacy are just overreacting because they know female creepers are so rare. They're using this chance to virtue signal hard.
People in her comments are all "yOu kNoW wHaT yOu DiD" and it's like…what did she do? Give some spare carnival tickets to a mom and her son? Give me a break.
About the worst thing she did was talk about trying to take photos, but if she was really hell-bent on getting a photo, she probably would've finessed the ticket thing into a group selfie moment. The dumbest part is that most of these people probably support Desmond is Amazing.

No. 468936

I don't care at all about the great "Do asexual people belong in the LGBT?" debate one way or the other, and I wish people would stop obsessing over it so hard.

No. 468938

>>468936
Agreed. It’s a complete non-issue. It’s just a made-up problem for people to feel angry about.

No. 468950

i hate rooms with lots of indoor plants and bohemian/indie decor. it's ugly as fuck and always smells bad

No. 468955

I'd forgive cancel culture if these woke fucks would finally cancel Jeffree Star.
Worst unwarranted self important faggot to have ever walked this gay earth.

No. 468959

>>468955
I'm still pissed over the fact Shane was sponsored by honey in his stupid little Jeffery doc. He's kind of at the point he doesn't need honey and the serous documentary tone clashes with the 15% off coupon!

No. 468966

>>468959
My unpopular opinion is that i don't think shane is an awesome document making king, it seems like he has never seen an actual documentary. The editing and mood is trash, including that sponsor ad.

No. 468972

>>468959
what's wrong with honey?

No. 468973

>>468966
he's no documentary making king, I agree. but as far as youtube goes he's decent.

No. 468980

>>468584
>I had to start shopping for bigger shoes in the adult women's section before I even entered 4th grade
Heh, I have the reverse version of this problem in which despite being an adult I still wear kids shoe sizes and can very rarely find shoes that I actually like since they're made for little girls and often have colors like hot pink and such.

No. 468981

>>468936
Same, my asexual friends don't care if they're included or not either so it just seems even more like a made up problem.

No. 469020

Makeup contouring doesn't really work irl and it's really only useful for photos that are being manipulated and shooped in some way already.
Contouring just makes the fact that you're wearing makeup that much more obvious.

No. 469046

"intuitive eating" doesn't make you healthy, it just makes you fat.

No. 469106

I love learning about and trying foods of different cultures but I do not give a shit if someone alters a recipe to their liking. I have seen someone say what they are eating was inspired by some dish only to have people rip them to shreds because they omitted or added an ingredient. Food is deep but not that deep.

No. 469127

Half the time people complaining about how 'they have to much work' simply caused the problem themselves. I've been with so many people who just slack off during their allocated work time making 'I have so much work' jokes when in reality they could have finished most of their work. Most 'I have to much work' jokes are simply from people who skim the work and say 'to hard' and stop. When in reality when you break the work down it isn't that hard. Hard work exists, but it's mostly exaggerated
>>469106
Reminds me how my dad, who grew up in Nigeria, always tried to 'fix' the American recipes he used to what he thought would be better. This always ended up with all his food tasting oddly Nigerian no matter how American it was.

No. 469130

I absolutely understand why so many girls try making the lewd/camgirl route work.
I know I'm lazy and should appreciate not living in a war zone but the rat race fucking sucks. I hate all the bullshit that comes with the minimum wage jobs that I'm giving my life to, if I thought I could realistically live an easy life at home on neckbeard patreon bucks then I would cling to that hope too. At least they have some kind of belief that they will make it happen if they keep at it enough, unlike me who just feels like life is an exhausting prison of work until you become the nursing work for some other minimum wage sucker.

No. 469192

>>469130
Camgirling is the worst "customer service" job there is.
Everyone is just memed into thinking because they don't have to report to an office or wear a uniform that it's much better.

If you calculate hourly, most camgirls never breach what most minimum wage earners make. They're "on call" at ungodly hours because men beg and whine to be serviced and get their attention constantly. Men themselves are horrible, entitled ass customers who can be abusive and try to get free shit all the time. Camgirls still technically spend a shitload of money on the "uniform" like makeup, lingerie, and new clothes to sell themselves better whereas if they don't keep up maintainence they could lose their base. The money itself can be inconsistent and fickle. Then camgirls have gotta deal with other camgirls trying to knock them out with competition and online smear campaigns.


Unless one reaches the top 1% of camgirls with clientele, it seems like an absolute shitshow.
Then if they ever want to "change industry" to get a real job (when they inevitably age out and can no longer compete or just get tired of it) they're fucked because there's a huge gap on their resume, they can't be honest about their history, and they gotta pray that nobody recognizes them from their past.
Just get a private sugar daddy if you must for some fun money.

No. 469211

>>469192
Women have been memed into believing camgirling is lucrative. It can be for the top earners but there is so much competition from women more desperate and more beautiful from impoverished countries. Lots of people will wash out.

Being a sugar baby isn't all great either because it's highly constrained by where you live. You can live someplace without the client base or live somewhere where the competition is too fierce.

Being a stripper is probably one of the better types of sex work because you aren't competing against a global supply of women.

No. 469214

>>469211
Although the money is probably better. Being a camgirl seems like one of the safer ways of sex work imho. Strip clubs you have to deal with customers irl and some are known to pressure the dancers to do more sex work for high paying customers.

No. 469224

I like Mickey Deer's real face.

No. 469225

>>468955
And that’s the biggest joke of “wokeness” and being “cancelled” Jeffrey is a pig, but he’s a fag and makes makeup, so they won’t cancel him. Look at BTS army, talking about love and accepting yourself and other uwu shit, but most armies don’t care about the Saudi Arabia controversy.

They only cancel shit they aren’t fans of.

No. 469226

>>469225
Its amazing the amount of shit hes gotten away with compared to others who have been cancelled for much less.

No. 469233

>>469224
same tbh i think she's pretty. she's got an unfortunate figure though and is a disgusting person

No. 469242

File: 1570221529361.jpg (184.81 KB, 1280x1163, fzb3jgroync21.jpg)

Narcissists have been de-humanized to an extreme point. It's because narcissist have become the meme word for "bad person" and you don't want to acidently insult narcissists victims, but NPD people deserve empathy, or at least to not be treated like literal demons. A lot of people treat people with NPD like they want to hurt people on purpose, like they get pleasure from it, but NPD usally evolve from a bad childhood or their own internal struggles. Im not defending NPD or discreting victims, but NPD never gets empathy it's always viliniazed. You can find a wealth of "you have to be patient because they have anxiety", but people who try to get better from NPD just get vilianized. I've seen someone with a child who was in therapy and self aware about their NPD get "you're a horrible mother for birthing a child with that disease of yours" comments. Its somewhat simaler for people with schizo, BPD, or any mental issue that isn't anxiety or depression. The push for mental illness awerness only harps on anxiety, deppression, and autism if they're realy pushing it. I feal people would actually benefit if it had an NPD awareness campaign

No. 469247

>>469245
Actually, rephrase: It's hard to feel empathy for people who are unempathetic and use their disorders as an excuse to refuse doing anything about it.

No. 469252

>>469242
IDK anon. I agree with it being overused and over diagnosed but the legit narc I know doesn’t deserve any sympathy or empathy because she’s an emotional vampire and won’t change. Imo genuine narcissists should be shuffled aside and ignored as much as possible by everyone except whoever researched ways to fix that nonsense.

NPD is notorious for not getting better and not making even the slightest effort to improve.

No. 469255

>>469242
Empathy is one of the main things that makes us human (aside from intelligence, but I still consider retards human) so someone who lacks that and manipulates/hurts others gets no empathy from me.

They should definitely seek out treatment for it though, I think it should be taken seriously.

No. 469275

>>469242

I feel really bad for people with those disorders but i still don't want to get anywhere near anyone with bpd again and i would not advice it to other people. Similar to how i would not want cleptomaniacs into my home near my valuables, they will screw you over, its their pathology, being empathic with a scorpion won't mean he won't sting you.

No. 469288

>>469242
If you refuse to get therapy and actively hurt everyone around you, especially vulnerable people who are dependent on you like your children, then you get no sympathy from me.

No. 469299

people on here are way too critical about art. it's one thing to criticise art that is clearly terrible, w irredeemably wonky anatomy or perspective, terrible expressions etc. but i swear whenever i visit any art or artist related thread it's 90% nitpicking about details or things that aren't that bad.
a lot of its mediocre, sure, but hardly the worst thing ever. idk it just gets pretty tiring to read all the nitpicks after a while

No. 469454

I'd rather a guy be a fast cummer than some beta numale who broke their own dick with porn and jerking off to the point where they aren't able to get it up during sex and aren't able to get off

No. 469456

>>469299
agreed. i dont actively follow any art cows but the artist salt thread is one of my favorite for stupid nitpicks and vendetta posts. those anons are just as bad as the people they bitch about and i love it

No. 469472

>>469242
You sound like a narc lmao if someone is managed to be diagnosed with NPD, it’s literally impossible that they’re not a terrible person. Plenty of people who had bad childhoods don’t turn out to be narcs, so put that card away please. Prove you’re no longer a piece of shit FIRST then you can ask for sympathy.
Also don’t group mental illnesses together, most mental illnesses aren’t the bane of humanity. Even within personality disorders, some are distinctly resistant to treatment (cluster B) because the majority of the time, the sufferers are fucking assholes with no desires to redeem themselves. Let’s not even talk about the those who pretend they are tRyiNG sO hArd in therapy to continue to manipulate and excuse themselves.
t. clusterBfag

No. 469476

>>469454
I fucking agree, I've dealt with this first hand. It's so difficult to get my bf to stay hard and/or orgasm, although I don't think he broke his dick. He has a low libido and told me he's had periods where he hadn't got the urge to even masturbate for months at a time… The times I've gotten him in the right mood and conditions to make him orgasm I could tell he was really into it, but it still doesn't even think about or crave that sort of intimacy ever. He still pleases me all the time and seems enthusiastic about it so I'm very happy.

Although I remember I got a little sad the other day because we were watching an episode of this show where a guy had premature ejaculation from a non-sex related thing, and my bf shyly said that used to happen to him all the time when he was a teen and he was doing random stuff like riding his bike. And then I thought it would be really cute if he would react that way if I was doing something really gentle like kissing or lightly touching him. What the fuck is wrong with me lmao.

No. 469479

>>469456
I also agree, there’s such an elitist attitude in those threads about every little artistic decision someone can make. I’m definitely one for not using a “style” as an excuse for bad artistic choices but some of the nitpicks on there seem to really not understand that some stylistic choices are still valid even if they personally don’t like them.

No. 469483

>>469479
ngl i never thought there would be anything worse than the vendetta posting in ana-chan threads but then munchies cam along. that was a whole debacle on its own but man, staunch artist salt anons top them and even the weird pettube anons easily.

No. 469503

>>469299
>>469456
>>469479
Agree with you guys. The artist anons on this site can be the pettiest motherfuckers around, at some point they were salty as hell because folks didn't appreciate their "cow fanart", writing full length rants about the new thread pic not being one of their totally witty "satire" pieces. Moving on they started clogging up artist cow threads with awful redraws that were just as bad as the original and didn't fix anything. Like we had that one anon who made a literal Jeff Goldblum portrait of a Holly Brown drawing, then went berserk when some other drawfag made a redraw of the same piece with way better composition using the anime-ish style Holly originally was going for, thus keeping the redraw faithful for an accurate comparison's sake. The original drawanon was going crazy calling everyone retarded weebs for appreciating the other one more and I'm still laughing reminiscing that.

Not only are they egoistical like that, they seem to consider "this bitch got expensive equipment and I'm jealous" quality milk. Nobody is interested in hearing how you've been dying to get that $200 watercolor set and are now pissing blood because someone more youtube famous bought it.

As for the "hideous art" thread people make obvious vendettaposts and flip out when anons tell them to calm their nitpicks. "Wonky anatomy" used in the context of "I hate this artist and want to find something vague to bitch about" is the art anon equivalent of nasolabial folds. When they're not doing that, they're obviously posting random OTT NSFW art just for people to gawk at their shock value or anime/other mainstream mediocre artists just to whine about how much more followers they have. I'm sorry commercially pleasing material sells better to the masses than your ~truly artistic~ visions, but you had to learn it at some point.

P.S: The "idk but I've heard this artist is problematic!!!!" anons need to integrate or fuck off. Nobody cares, this isn't your woke twitter dashboard.

No. 469508

>>469503
Art people are always autistic and obnoxious as hell considering 99% of their 'art" is just rehashed boring shit and has no actual creativity or interesting elements at all. I prefer music heads over art heads for this reason but most people can't sing or make music

No. 469538

>>469476
ugh same. I can tell my bf likes me and is into me but there is a huge differences in our libido and it really sucks. We've looked into medical problems it's that bad. Now he's on meds that make it even WORSE and I'm dying lol. He's going to talk to his doctor soon to try something else. I'm usually the partner on the other side of this issue so I'm pretty understanding but it still is so frustrating. He barely watches porn and barely masturbates also. It's not due to deathgrip or anything like that. He will really want to have sex too and just can't. I feel embarrassed talking about it but I'm pretty sure it's a legit medical issue.

My ex was like the exact opposite and basically a raging cheating sex addict that was ALWAYS horny so I feel like goldilocks lmao. He's a really good dude and all around super caring and helpful so I really do think it's worth it most of the time but I jerk off a lot…..

No. 469575

>>469299
I strongly suspect that a large majority of "artists" on the artist salt threads are themselves mediocre artists and posting about artists slightly worse then them to feel better about themselves

No. 469582

>>469575
Yeah, I was hoping the threads would be more about dirt on the art community (gossip, speculation, networking drama) like the discussions on Soey Milk or Leslie Hung, but it’s 99% about Youtubers, who are more entertainers than anything else.

>inb4 why don’t you contribute

Cause I don’t know shit and that’s why I look at the threads.

No. 469586

>>469503
Hey I'm the artist that drew the anime-ish style Holly redraw (along with ~20 other images in that thread) Wish more people posted.

I think it's easier to draw a better rendition when you have something to base it off of. You can avoid the mistakes of the original, and editing art is easier than drawing from scratch.

Anyway someone please contribute to the redraw thread. I don't want to post my 5th image in a row. The bad redraws are the best part of the thread.

As for the Artist Salt thread there isn't much interesting content.
Guess your opinion isn't an unpopular opinion after all.

No. 469596

I enjoy Lainey's channel (sans onion). I've only followed the threads and watched Aldii's onion vids but I've been watching Lainey's stuff because I was afraid that all of it might be deleted someday, but now I like it. The feeling is similar to watching your favorite movie after an actor in it was exposed for being a predator.

No. 469616

I think psychology is a great field. There's nothing wrong with seeking to study the mind and its inner workings. It's prone to trial and error precisely because it's a lot less simplistic than other forms of science.
I personally find the fact that it's in constant "construction mode" exciting and challenging.
Outside of it being a profession in itself, many successful figures who have to be part of social affairs or speak publicly in any capacity (see: most, if not all of them) actually make it a point to have some understanding of psychology so they can get what they want.
People who go on about how STEM is superior to everything just strike me as socially stunted, bitter and maybe a little anxious about what the field could reflect about them.

No. 469623

>>469616
psychology is STEM tho. but my unpopular opinion is if it uses the scientific method it's science so even social sciences like parts of sociology are stemlike in my mind.

No. 469624

>people are reverting back to refusing to believe mental health exists
I hate how controversial mental health is

No. 469628

File: 1570348540280.png (122.44 KB, 265x275, 1568251525218.png)

>>469623
>like parts of sociology

And parts of astrology lol

No. 469630

>>469628
NTA, but anon, do you even know what science is?

No. 469632

I want to vent about being stuck in a situation where having a child is not an option while the women around me are getting pregnant, but every time I try, I get a bunch of “women are more than baby factories” ranting and raving saying I should be grateful to be childless when I don’t want to be because their feminism is anti natalist and insists wanting a family means you’re a brainwashed tard.

It’s so fucking annoying to be told you’re not allowed to be upset over something that devastates you, or to be shit all over for it.

I’m sad because I want a baby and everyone who gets pissy about it can suck a sharp dick.

No. 469635

>>469632
What are you talking about?

No. 469636

>>469635
I want a baby but am not in a situation where having one is a good idea.

My in-laws are all getting pregnant and I’m sad about it.

Tried to vent about it somewhere and was dogpiled with comments about how there’s more to life than being a baby factory, I must be a crawling handmaiden for wanting a family, and am lucky to not be a ‘mombie’

Honestly thought that was clear.

No. 469637

>>469635
It's frustrating that people minimize what a tragedy it is when a woman that wants a baby can't have one, and is clearly devastated by it. Yes, there's more to life than children, but not everyone agrees those other things are better.

No. 469638

>>469636
>mombie
LMFAO. Those women are insane. Yeah nobody should be a mombie, we should all die out instead.

No. 469642

>>469636
‘Mombie’ is such a misogynistic insult, oh no, how dare women care about their kids or want to talk about them. Child free communities are so fucking cancerous, nobody cares that they don’t want kids other than a handful of relatives, I don’t get their sheer rage towards kids and their parents to the point of dehumanisation and namecalling

No. 469643

I think it's okay for celebrities to publicly voice their political opinions. It can feel cheap when it's disingenuous or a gimmick, but in the end, they're still people entitled to make their thoughts heard.
When you become an actress or a singer, you don't forfeit your right to participate in political discussion. In fact, throughout history, musicians in particular were often politically involved. One of America's presidents was literally an actor, and the current president was a reality show star.
Whenever people complain about celebrities getting political, it feels more like they're mad that a particular celebrity doesn't share their opinion, and it worries them that somebody with a wide audience can disseminate ideas that contradict their own. It's almost cowardly.

No. 469662

>>469642
>>469638
Nice falseflagging, mombie has nothing to do with being a loving mother or interest in motherhood. Mombie denotes the specific type whose favorite pastimes include: self-pity olympics, one-upping other moms, judging other moms’ choices, judging child-free women, lashing out at everyone, literal narcissism. The more mombie behavior exhibited, the higher likelihood of having a poorly behaved child. Childfree-fags may reeE on the Internet, but mombies reEe irl, and no one can criticize them.

No. 469666

>>469662
There's no point in reasoning here. These type of posts are just another excuse for shitting on feminism or just any woman that is career oriented or doesn't want to have kids. Note the typical scrote response few posts above.

No. 469667

>>469662
Bit much to call it falseflagging lol.
People other than you use the word, and use it contexts other than the one you gave.

Not agreeing with someone’s use of a word isn’t a conspiracy, and it doesn’t make every use of it outside your definition a made-up story.

No. 469668

>>469666
So the feminist thing to do is insult or tell off a woman who laments their childlessness and isn’t saying anything about other women’s choices?

No. 469673

>>469667
nta but the entire society, at least in the western world, is welcoming to mothers and those that want to become mothers. Women wanting to have kids is always seen as positive thing and ~natural~. So a few anons may have said something about not having kids is not the worst thing that can happen which was probably coming from a good place in their heart and now that anon is being a bitch and playing a victim which honestly seems like just another excuse to shit on feminism because s/he is clearly pushing in that direction. Why not stop beating around the bush and just type it?

Also, this is an unpopular opinion thread not the vent thread. Maybe she shouldn't have kids considering she cant into reading comprehension.

>>469668
It's not feminist and I would like to see those posts myself before jumping to conclusions if they were really phrased like that. My guess is that they just wanted to comfort the anon.

No. 469674

>>469662
Mostly I see it used for women who have no personality or interests outside of their kid, but generally I agree.

And honestly, who are anons trying to fool acting like women get more shit for wanting kids than not wanting kids… people are either vicious or pitying towards older, childless women. The stigma is massive. I don't deny childfree communities can be way OTT but it's not a surprising reaction if they get regularly shit on for it irl. Anon's story doesn't even make sense, she knows all these pregnant women but everyone is bullying her for wanting a kid? Why doesn't she talk to the pregnant women instead of anti natalists? They are rare af, literally never met one irl and what are the chances those are the only people anon has to talk to about this.

No. 469676

>>469674
I posted it on an anon forum. I’m not discussing it with the pregnant women because people tend to not enjoy having someone crying about their own lack of kids whilst they are pregnant. Why moan to them?

Being shat on by a few antinatalist pricks who misconstrue feminist ideas to suit their bitter autism does not mean i magically abhor feminism or feminists. Feminism is an obvious necessity for women to be treated like people.

No. 469677

>>469673
Saying Babies are a cancer and you should be grateful to not spawn was not someone trying to be comforting.

No. 469680

>>469674
>for women who have no personality or interests outside of their kid

So shitting on mother's for putting their kids as priority and actually giving a crap like parents are supposed to do.

Wow, how horrible monsters trying to do their best, they should care less about their children and more about Kpop drama.

No. 469683

>>469680
I think people who say things like this don’t have kids themselves, of course a child becomes a huge part of someone’s identity- you are constantly caring for them, day in day out, watching them reach milestones, grow as a person, develop their own personality and passions.
They are literally your whole world and that’s how it should be. Loving your child is a love like no other.

No. 469684

>>469680
For real. First instinct for anon is to call another woman a lying bitch because anon doesn’t like what was posted and then goes on to give a lecture and the rest shit on mother’s for being interested in their kids.

No. 469693

>>469680
I'm not participating in this argument and nta you're replying to, but yes, you should still keep interests and an identity separate from your child. It's not a zero sum game, you can still have passions while prioritizing your child. I know friends with kids like this.

Making your child your world sounds like you're gonna get hit hard with co dependency and empty nest syndrome later in life.

No. 469697

>>469693
Not the anon you replied to but the people she was talking about often think that a mother "loses her personality" simply because she puts her child first like any parent is supposed to. You can still be interested in your own stuff and have hobbies, but of course being in charge of another living being cuts your personal time down significantly. That doesn't mean you've forgotten about your own life or personality.

I don't get these anons who have an issue with moms taking care of their kids. They're probably the ones who grew up as a spoiled bratty child ungrateful to their parents and thus are blind to the sacrifices and effort they put into their children and can't appreciate it properly. Or they unironically believe that if they were ever to have kids, it means they will magically turn into a frothing mombie whose entire identity revolves around diapers and breastfeeding. Of course new mothers are always overly excited for their kid and can't shut up about them but in the end when the kid grows up and isn't as needy and dependent on their mother, she will have time to herself again.

No. 469699

>>469693
>you're gonna get hit hard with co dependency and empty nest syndrome later in life.
Can confirm, happened to my own mom. She's having trouble finding something, anything to fill her time now. I've definitely learned from that.

No. 469701

>>469697
>Not the anon you replied to but the people she was talking about often think that a mother "loses her personality"

Is that what the op anons upthread said or are you just venting? I'd find it odd that anons here would rally against moms taking good care of their kids, considering how critical they are of moms who don't.

No. 469703

>>469701
Abandoning everything else in your life to focus on your kid doesn't necessarily make you a good parent. It could also mean you're a toxic helicopter parent. Also a woman shouldn't have to have no personality outside of being a mom in order to be a good mom.

No. 469706

>>469703
I agree and definitely believe there's a difference between a 'good mom who takes care of her kids and still has hobbies' versus 'mom whose entire world revolves around her kids to the point where it's become her identity.'

No. 469707

>>469701
>>469703
I'm >>469697 and meant to say that people think not losing your personality equals carrying on like before and ignoring your kid to be yourself. When that's often impossibility for a parent unless they're being extremely neglectful.

No. 469761

dumb ass shit but, all this mom sperging gave me an idea for a youtube skit.
>millenial parent
>tfw breaking up with ur baby
>"Offspring, I think we need some time apart…"
>Baby looks confused
>"It's not you, it's me! The time we spent together, I always put your needs first… I have forgotten who I am before you. My therapist says I must find myself again and learn to set healthy boundaries, I think we both need to, if you want this relationship to work."
>Gotta Go My Own Way - Troy & Gabriela, plays in bg

No. 469778

>>469761
Then put it in the dumbass shit thread not in an unpopular opinion thread. holy shit, is it that hard to read the fucking OP?
By the way, that's such a lame skit I almost threw up. It's not funny or thought provoking or entertaining in any way.

No. 469780

File: 1570382739596.gif (555.86 KB, 480x202, giphy (1).gif)

>>469778
Ahem, it's funny bc millenials hate babies, hellooooooo

No. 469815

>>469761
I feel embarrassed for you because you cant even delete this now

No. 469842

>>469780
It's not. Please stop.

No. 469865

>>469680
>>469684
Wtf is this absolute strawman? Having no interest outside kids =/= being a good parent. They are literally two entirely different things. Talking about your kid 24/7 doesn't help the kid, it doesn't disclude poor parenting, it just means you have literally nothing else to say and no life of your own outside them. The best mothers tend to NOT be like that, obsessive parenting can turn into clinging and hovering and being overbearing at worst.

Frankly I only mentioned the definition I was aware of for clarification, not because I felt like shitting on moms. I feel more sympathy for a lot of 'mombies' than dislike. I know it's hard to keep a sense of self when you're isolated with a kid and little support. But compared to centuries of childless women being called spinsters or not real women and, more recently, cat ladies, christmas cakes, etc etc… it's fucking nothing worth getting offended over.

No. 469885

>>469865
Did you ever stop to think that someone complaining about something on a tiny anonymous board isn’t the same thing as contributing to the shitty idea that all women must have children to be fulfilled or else be madwomen who belong in the attic?
Maybe sometimes people are sad about things and their sadness isn’t a goddamn statement about how all women should feel and act?

Invalidating someone by saying ‘well but this bad thing happens to others and it’s worse so your sadness is the big dumb’ is very masculine energy tbh.

No. 469886

>>469842
It was tongue in cheek anon, I thought the gif gave it away.

No. 469887

>>469886
It was extremely unfunny even for anons against the mombie meme.

No. 469888

>>469885
Genuinely no idea what you're talking about. I am not talking about the original poster who is sad about something, I'm talking about all the other anons who are mad about the term mombie existing. They are the ones overreacting.

No. 469891

>>469887
Do you know what 'tongue in cheek' means? I'm agreeing with you….

No. 469892

>>469886
>>469891
She thinks you're the OP who wrote the weird skit and not a separate person who responded sarcastically.

No. 470366

I think there's an obvious line when a domestic violence situation is the woman's fault, especially when they perpetuate their "abuser". I work security and we had a group of women come into my work the other day for an employer class and they all demanded we vet every single man that came in because one of the woman's ex-husband knew where the was at. First of all, why does someone's ex husband have this information especially if he's not working with the company? The only people who know this info are the staff at my facility and the client. And the thing is, she never described to us what her ex husband looked like or what his name was, like that would be very crucial for her safety. It honestly felt like she told him out of spite "I'm gonna be at this exact location and they won't let you come in! Nuhh!" Like who does that?!