[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/w/ - vloggers, lolita, cosplay

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password
(For post deletion)

Read the rules and usage info before posting.

The VPN ban is now in effect on /ot/, see this update post for more information

File: 1751681651658.jpg (484.87 KB, 1080x1919, threadpic.jpg)

No. 352161

Previous threads:
>>>/w/325162
>>>/w/291816
>>>/w/257769
>>121374
>>40202
>>22555
>>>/w/179758
>>>/w/199602
>>>/w/209757


Taylor R is a “hardworking” “self-made” “successful” former model and Youtuber from Canada whose main claim to fame used to be copying Dakota’s embarrassing 2012 - 2015 living doll phase. She’s since abandoned this endeavor to copy fellow gold digger Valeria Lipovesky and any other content creator that appears in her tiktok feed.

Her husband, Tom Lip is a successful businessman. One of his companies, MenClub, was exposed for featuring at least 8 underage (age 12-16) girls in skimpy clothing on their site. After news of this spread, Taylor made two videos defending the right of men to ogle children (it’s “cultural”! Don’t like, don’t click!), both of which are now conveniently privated.

Taylor herself has started her own business, TOAT, which is alas "currently on pause", apparently for motherhood reasons.

Ever since her successful carrier(s) faded, she focused on her IVF "journey", more about which can be found in previous threads. After it came her mini lectures about Traditional Chinese medicine and post-partum confinement, presented as universal truth and law.

After a miscarriage - news of which she dumped on an unassuming follower struggling with infertility - she announced her determination to once again fulfill her sacred duty of providing offspring for her infertile husband, this time without help from IVF treatments. Due to the firm belief that they can indeed conceive naturally, she hasn't seen a gynecologist ever since having her son, despite the above-mentioned miscarriage and self-diagnosed hormonal inbalances, opting instead to rely on Chinese medicine and the latest fad diets from dubious wellness gurus.


Currently she's busy recycling and copying years-old trends from tiktok, testing and promoting debunked health gimmicks, and posting sponsored content on Instagram - often undisclosed and featuring her toddler. Every now and then she chooses to overshare about her, her family's and especially her dog's health conditions, usually with disgusting and unnecessary details.

Her YouTube channel is now abandoned and gets updated only if a company is dumb enough to sponsor her videos, hence the lack of new YouTube content.


Beware the resident white knights and stans in the thread. Don't respond to bait and ignore sperges.

Taylor’s Links:
https://www.facebook.com/Taylor.R.Official
https://www.instagram.com/taytay_xx/
https://www.youtube.com/user/TaylorR1488
https://www.tiktok.com/@tay_richard
https://twitter.com/iamtay_tay
https://toat.com
https://www.instagram.com/toat.co

Tom Lip's controversial site for men: https://www.menclub.hk/

Old links (no longer updated):
http://lovetaylor.com/
http://www.weibo.com/taylorrichard
http://lineblog.me/taylor/
https://ameblo.jp/iamtaytay/
http://taytay.zipper.jp/
http://www.cchan.tv/clipper/taylor

No. 352164

Really spammed the old thread about hair just to prompt the new thread message. What is it about this cow and the retards that keep up with her?

No. 352166

>>352164
Notice that there is no recap of last thread's milk either. Maybe because there is never any milk to recap?

No. 352167

>>352166
Just noticed that you're right. There is no recap from the last thread.

No. 352169

>>352167
There wasn't a recap for the last thread either. I have no clue why these threads are still even open.

No. 352174

>>352169
She continues to be brainless and shilling random shit based on vague internet research. I don't think evolving from one type of social media grifter to another is real growth or maturity, but since she doesn't seem to need yt anymore, she's content to do the occasional brand post or post her kid in some sponsored space with some sponsored toy. There really isn't much milk until she starts sperging about pregnancy or another completely totally legit business venture that has nothing to do with her husband.

No. 352175

>>352174
Most of the pregnancy stuff was normal in China though.

No. 352176

No recent milk summary? Yeah I thought so

No. 352177

>>352176
For almost 4 threads now.

No. 352188

I love this tradition of stans shitting up every single new thread with complaints about the thread, its description and its existence. make a better thread next time if you don't like how others make it. the thread was very slow recently and you had plenty of time kek.

No. 352192

File: 1751722684690.jpg (845.06 KB, 1080x3958, 20250705_153.jpg)

>>352159
Oh, she's hellbent on denying the obvious lmao. Thank god anons had receipts and posted them in the previous thread. But I bet she'll stop getting it after the reading the Brazilian lady's comment. She is right in many aspects especially about bleached hair looking shit after keratin - Taylor herself needed an urgent color touch up after the treatment.(continuing hair nitpicking after farmhand warning)

No. 352193

File: 1751724649644.jpg (84.92 KB, 1080x1485, 20250705_2505.jpg)

>>352192
i always roll on the floor laughting whenever taylor mentions finances and complains about something being expensive.
girl, you are not fooling anyone. if you can afford and choose to go to one of the most expensive salons for a haircut, you can't complain about the prices.
the salon she went to charges $100+ for a haircut, btw. she lives in a bubble.(continuing hair nitpicking after farmhand warning)

No. 352196

>>352193
>>352192
Her hair isn't this important.

No. 352197

File: 1751726411143.jpg (364.69 KB, 1080x1901, 113120250704123141.jpg)

>>352193
Lmao anon she easily payed triple that. She got a haircut to fix her failed attempt at cutting bangs at home, got a coloring session, full head of toner and treatments, and all of that on a whim. She's just acting down-to-earth and relatable for her gullible audience. Tbf, there were some comments about the insane prices of the salon when the reel was just posted but now there's one is left and its among the replies posted above lmao(continuing hair nitpicking after farmhand warning)

No. 352198

why does she have a thread? she isn't really a cow. all these replies are just nitpicking(take it to meta)

No. 352200

>>352198
Didn't farmhands say going on about hair treatments isn't worth it to post about? This bitch is so dry she's producing powder.

No. 352236

This thread is now auto-saged and will remain so until real milk needs to be discussed.

No. 352683

>>352161
shame she isn't making vlogs anymore.
Planning on watching all of her old vlogs from oldest to newest in the name of sheer nostalgia. Just eyeballing the video archive it seems she has taken down/hidden some vids.

No. 352702

>>352683
A lot of creators like Taylor switched to shorter form content because its whats lucrative for the algorithm thats existing right now. Tiktok made a huge shift for reels and shorts and thats where a lot of people are posting now. A lot of vloggers also do short form videos (mind you max 10 minutes on tiktok though) or only use youtube for longer videos. She hasn't posted a long video in a while because she's doing all the ADs and shortform instead. It's better money until and quicker to push out than a 9 part baby docu. She's been like this for a few years now, so expect uploads several months apart.

No. 352705

>>352683
>>352702
I think we can confidently wave vlogs goodbye for good. The last promised vlog never saw light of day despite months-long promises of many parts. All she posted were two lukewarm, half-assed reels. None of her alluded collabs were posted either. Heck, she barely posts even on insta. I guess the latest hair "transformation" updates didn't get the traction she planned so she's taking a "much-needed break" until there's a new topic to obsess about kek

No. 352709

I tried looking up more about Tom’s business but there’s barely anything known I find that so sketch. In HK that’s all private and you need to pay to find out about company details like the who’s the owner, business activity.
The thread intro says he had multiple businesses Idk what the others are, can’t believe this hasn’t been discussed yet.
And how did he get money to start his business btw was his family always rich?(sage your shit)

No. 352712

>>352709
He's not really the focal point and if you can't look him up, then anon who made the OP probably was tinfoiling. He only comes up under the magazine. He's not even the owner.

No. 352723

>>352709
>>352712
search the old threads, newfags, no one's gonna spoonfeed you old af info here.

No. 352734

File: 1752487381316.jpg (917.26 KB, 1134x3647, 1752486691387.jpg)

Did you guys catch when she removed this weird link from her bio? I took the screen shot in the first week of July and now it's gone.

No. 352736

File: 1752490396893.jpg (741.2 KB, 1080x2015, 12444220250714.jpg)

>>352734
Interesting. I didn't even notice that. I would've assumed she posted it by mistake but it can't be a coincidence, you have to click through so many windows to change your bio.
Nice catch lmao. It could be tied to the recent vacation in Macau btw. Girl even posted their schedule hour by hour. TayTay 20.0 doesn't put so much effort into a post if she's not payed kek

No. 352738

File: 1752492980596.png (787.33 KB, 864x1178, 1000051881.png)

>>352712
There's no "tinfoil," he is a focal point of this thread. He is the owner, director, and CEO of MenClub. He also owns BeautyExchange, Studio 54 (a talent agency), and used to own/run Velvet HK. EIG Limited was some other company he had. Some of the companies seem dead, like EIG Limited and Studio 54.

Menclub just featured a high school student (Shirahama Mito, born oct 2006) and used pictures of her dating back at least to early 2024 (red strapless bra pic), possibly earlier. I guess they are back to posting underage girls.

No. 352739

>>352738
The aoc in HK (and Japan?) is 16 so not underage. Still creepy af but technically legal

No. 352759

>>352739
The images are risque for people who are 16, but you are right that the images are also legal where they are from and pretending the US and UK don't have movies and shows where they put kids in push-up bras and a tank top to sell the same thing also in magazines, sort of confuses me. They were never nude images either, just adults in general taking advantage of women as usual. It's just like Playboy putting girls in pictorials and not disclosing their ages. It's not a good thing at all, but it's not unique to men's club. This is so old now, it doesn't even need to be discussed again.

No. 352765

nonnas, do you think taylor actually finds her husband attractive?

No. 352768

>>352765
Yeah. I don't see why not. He's not super ugly, he's just unkempt. Not everyone has the same standards and they seems to have a good relationship. If it was only for the money, she easily could've gotten some sports player or music artist imo.

No. 352780

Oh, look Tom's fangirls have arrived, long time no see. Go leave your bootlicking comments under his and her insta instead. He's an ugly, unkempt moid who made his fortune by exploiting teenage girls. Taylor is no better because she not only doesn't judge it but actively supported and advocated for him and his sleazy magazine. You are no better than them if you see nothing wrong with it.(infight bait)

No. 352790

>>352765
I think shes aware shes a trophy wife and cares more about the lifestyle than him.

No. 352801

>>352765
Of course not. She's moneysexual and being rich is the only thing that matters to her. Banging a hideous scrote is just the price to pay for that and she sees it as worth it. We've clearly seen they're barely able to have a conversation and they certainly don't have anything in common.

No. 352804

>>352759
Well, the point is that after denying anything was wrong, Tom said they would stop featuring girls under 18. But they never stopped, so that was a lie. There have been younger women featured since he said that (discussed in previous threads).

The UK and US do not encourage underage girls to do gravure. Sexualized children are not featured in men's magazines alongside camgirls and porn stars. I think you need to prove what you say about push-up bras and stuff because idk what you are talking about. These girls' cup sizes in middle school are discussed on MenClub. The article above goes on at length about how she still looks like a child:
>Although "Shirahama Mito" still has a childish face, people may think she is still a little girl. But in fact, her cute baby face is one of the reasons why she became popular so quickly. When she appeared on "Weekly Playboy" in the early years, she was even given the title of "Tottori Prefecture Sister", which further united people's hearts with the geographical relationship. Coupled with her white and smooth skin that reflects light, and her plump figure that she claimed to have made her neck and shoulders ache when she was in elementary school, it is no wonder that some media believe that she is expected to "unify" the entire photo industry! I wonder if you are willing to be ruled by her?

I'm not a specialist on men's wank mags but I don't that's not typical discussion in mainstream Western men's media.

The easiest solution for all of this would have been to fire the perv who writes all the "girls" entries. He also wrote the gross articles about why it's good to date underage girls (they have since been deleted but were archived in previous threads). Tom has chosen not to get rid of this man.

No. 352846

>>352804
Tom isn't the owner of the magazine, right? He can't just fire people if he's not in a position to do so. He owns a technology payment service, not the magazine.

No. 352865

>>352846
That was their justification back in the day - he's not the editor, he can't change what gets published but even if he were "it's a cultural difference, don't like, don't look" vomit But he owns the magazine, that's for sure.

No. 352869

>>352865
You know we never got confirmation he owns it, just that his name was prolific because Taylor was prolific. Can you post confirmation he owns the magazine? All Google searches are coming up empty. I can't find any history he was ever high up in the company at all. I doubt it's been erased or anything, but even old caps have nothing saying he owns it or ever did. This isn't asking to be spoonfed, this is pointing out information we've never had. Just anons made the claim and we've just always ran with it. I'm shocked it hasn't been mentioned before.

No. 352876

>>352869
If you go back a few threads, there were translated Chinese news articles confirming he's the CEO of his companies.

No. 352878

>>352876
But of Men's Club? Since it's being brought back up for some reason, a nonna should link what thread all the confirmation was in. That way everyone can just be on the same page. To clarify, a CEO doesn't make someone an owner. Shareholders are owners and they are the ones who hire a CEO who doesn't necessarily have enough stock to make decisions.(spoonfeeding request)

No. 352883

File: 1752587779852.jpg (549.81 KB, 900x1600, 1000051936.jpg)

>>352878
I seriously can't believe we now have to prove the fact that he owns/runs MenClub to people like you, who seem unaware that Taylor herself posted two videos defending her moid's business decisions as they pertain to this magazine. He started this business back in 2012 and hasn't "worked his way up." He was always in charge of it. I do not know if his ownership percentage is public information, but why does that matter? He never ever denied owning, running, or being responsible for this magazine.

Here is Tom's own post on the subject, indicating that he had one post deleted and directed his editorial team to not post little girls anymore, even though he doesn't find anything wrong with it.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BuFStgMlHTF/?igsh=MThtem5wZm9iaXE4dg==

picrel: Conversation between Tom and a HK guy about underage models promoted on MC (which Tom never denies owning).

No. 352884

File: 1752588617915.jpg (452.35 KB, 839x1600, 1000051944.jpg)

>>352883
doubleposting to give a link to Taylor's second video about her husband's business
>>233373
In the transcript (picrel), she says that he is the boss and that he is responsible for the content, even if he personally doesn't write it.

No. 352895

>>352883
>>352884
Could've just linked it because farmers are talking about it again. It's been almost a decade, so makes sense since the OP doesn't even say what thread it is in that anons don't know or don't remember this whole big scandal that existed. Next OP should have links next to each landmark situation that's listed including her saying no more TOAT for now. Unfortunately, a rushed and unchanged OP for 4 threads now won't ever be updated for this. It would be really convenient.

No. 352899

>>352895
Anon shouldn't have responded to the spoonfeed requests in the first place. Tom's fangirls don't count as regular farmers and should've been banned straight away. Instead they were left to derail and tinfoil about facts being tinfoil (the irony).

No. 352900

>>352899
Putting the links in the OP might be a smart idea for next thread though if this even gets to a new thread. Other OPs have that, so that they don't have to deal with newfags who can't find old content to answer their own tinfoils.

No. 352924

>>352736
Wow the kid looks exactly like dad.. sad for him

No. 352927

>>352738
Thanks nonna for listing the companies. I did find something about Velvet HK being the company behind Mensclub. Yeah good idea to just put that in the thread intro. Do I really need to scroll back multiple threads for something essential to the thread. Which I did scroll back btw but if it’s burried in a screenshot I can’t textsearch a screenshot. So that’s why I couldn’t find it.
The velvet company looks dead you say, is it because they need to renew their company registration?

No. 352930

>>352883
So he just started it out of the blue and that’s all we know no aspirations no backstory on how he started it. Usually CEO’s like to share some glorified version of how they started to run things but oke, besides the thread is pretty slow anyways. Kek I know you like complaining about spoonfeeding nona but you told us anyway. I just find it strange that he started a company and that’s it, he was instantly rich. It doesn’t make sense to me. Investors are needed at some point. The contents before were grooming and close to trafficking. So that’s why I thought the origin story is probably more dark. But no one seems to know who funded it. A company with employees like any other business isn’t churning out millions overnight. The entertainment industry is always sinister and more for kids/teens to fall prey to.

No. 352935

>>352930
Reading what came from this sounds like the owner didn't know his managers in place were allowing content like this to be printed or posted, and assumed the people he had hired to be put in charge would think more critically. I'm not defending Tom before anons scream and jump to conclusions, but CEOs aren't really the people who finalize the review of stuff like this. It's the people below him that he would've put in charge. There doesn't seem to be any indication that the point of finalization for submitted articles goes through Tom or would ever go through Tom. I agree, this is all old, but it's nice to be able to have a critical discussion about facts we do and don't know.

No. 352938

>>352935
Hmm I can see where you’re coming from so maybe he wasn’t AS involved, in the process of scouting teens for his creepy magazine.

No. 352945

>>352938
I agree that he had to take responsibility for it though. It is or was his magazine. He has to acknowledge what his workers did and approved.

No. 352946

>>352927
They registered Tom's shady magazine under Taylor's now dead business, link for newfags >>113531. And all of his businesses are listed one under another. May be that why Sherlock-newfag couldn't find shit about the businesses.
This was extensively discussed ages ago. Spoonfeed link for newfags - read from >>113385 onwards.

All I did was search Toat and MenClub in older threads, btw, it took me less than ten minutes to find these, so, no, it's not hard to find, you lazies.

>>352935
Anon, just a couple of posts above yours there are screenshots of him defending his sleazy magazine and its disgusting content. What more proof do you need?

No. 352948

>>352930
>>352935
Both of you are idiots, sorry. He got rich from BeautyExchange and started MenClub after that. He has an origin story for BE and for Velvet because neither of those were started to titillate men. I don't think his idea for an HK Hustler needed a big story.
>Investors are needed at some point.
He has ad sponsorships (ties that began with BeautyExchange) and has a bunch of wealthy friends. But you're free to look up who his investors are.

He was directly interviewing women to work for him at BeautyExchange, and they turned up to the interviews in schoolgirl outfits. I'd say he's pretty damn involved in his businesses. Proof:
>>113071 (article link about interviews)
>>113072 (photo from article)

more about early Menclub here
>>23085
>>129120

No. 352950

File: 1752618589916.jpg (1.25 MB, 2160x3840, 1000051954.jpg)

I found some 2010 photos of Tom allegedly talking about BeautyExchange. I don't think they've ever been posted. He really doesn't know how to dress for a business event, but interestingly enough he also doesn't dress like a poor person. Just like a douche.

No. 352997

>>352765
Kek no she is always making underhanded/backhanded compliments and complaints disguised as jokes to reveal her annoyance. I.e., the nonstick pan he uses, the way he eats a hamburger, other stuff I’m forgetting off the top of my head

No. 352999

>>352997
A lot of couples make fun of each other for little things like this. That doesn't mean they don't like each other. He seems to spend money just as randomly as she does.

No. 353011

>>352950
Yikes. Even in his younger years he was a total uggo, just a bit thinner of a bobble head with hips wider than his shoulders kek. Taylor should pray to all gods for these genes to stay repressed and that Levi takes only after her

No. 353172

File: 1752797642025.jpg (124.91 KB, 1080x702, IMG_051207.jpg)

And here's the answer about the mysterious Japan vlog. I suppose it will never get restored or posted.

No. 353174

>>353172
We've known the videos are coming. People just expect stuff immediately.

No. 353196

>>353174
People expect stuff within reasonable time frames. You can't tease a vlog for three months, then post nothing and expect people to not ask questions.
I hardly think they're coming anyway kek It's July, she won't post a winter vlog in summer.

No. 353230

>>353196
Did she really tease it though? Everyone else keeps bringing it up, but she posted a week after and that was it unless she references "I went back to Japan, I miss it" here and there. She wasn't promoting this weekly as something coming soon.

No. 353262

>>353230
yeah, she even made a poll asking if she should split the vlog into two. then mentioned it in her stories several times, posted about editing it, then months passed but there were no more updates and no more mentions of the vlog. I don't have screenshots of her stories, though. maybe other anons have them.

No. 353277

>>353262
Yeah teased it for a little while after but then nothing for months. I mean, I guess that vouches for the hard drive issues if theres been nothing since.

No. 353307

File: 1752911651779.png (1.1 MB, 864x1446, 1000052025.png)

>>353277
There have been plenty of ads she edited using her computer. 4.5 months after her trip, the computer seems to be working, and it's been seen in other stories I didn't cap. idk why you think not posting stuff makes her excuse true. She has no tech abilities so she doesn't need to spend time recovering files, she will just hire someone to recover files (like most people would), and there are thousands of such people in HK.

No. 353316

>>353196
>she won't post a winter vlog in summer
She had no problems uploading Levi's first birthday vlog half a year late because she had sudden and one time only "anxiety" about posting on YouTube lmao You never know what genius justifications can her bird brain create.

>>353307
Exactly! She's bullshitting as always. Plus, the "look at me working on the computer, editing stuff" is just for show. She has at least one editor and she disclosed that herself, so no idea why she's now pretending to be some teach-savvy and an editor.

No. 353373

>>353307
Which ad is that on her computer, like what is she editing? Her contracts to post, all those sponsorships anons say she has, take priority over her now "hobby". Might as well call it that since she hardly does YouTube and instead focuses on short-form.

No. 353381

File: 1752998960220.png (1.03 MB, 864x1474, 1000052036.png)

>>353373
>anons say she has
what's your problem? she has them, look at her account for "ad" and "paid partnership." The trip.com link in her bio was another sponsorship.

Based on the face close-ups and date, it looks like she is editing the Charlotte Tilbury ad, which she didn't seem to mark as an ad unless I missed that (but it 100% is one).

No. 353383

>>353381
Safe to say these take precedence.

No. 353388

File: 1753013999596.jpg (804.46 KB, 1080x1903, IMG_20250720_071750.jpg)

She's going nuts, I'm telling you. The possibility of Tom getting diabetes in the upcoming couple of years is a billion times higher than her or him getting colon cancer from not eating enough fiber.

No. 353421

File: 1753048987305.jpg (400.99 KB, 1080x2006, CDC colon cancer.jpg)

>>353388
Who's gonna tell her Tom has the higher risk due to his age, sex, fat and lifestyle kek Unless you ate exclusively ultra-processed red meat and zero fiber "in the 90s", you're not at risk, princess TayTay.

Link to CDC on colon cancer risk factors. https://www.cdc.gov/colorectal-cancer/risk-factors/index.html

No. 353433

>>353388
>I am upping my family's fiber intake immediately
kek it sounds like she's a single mother deciding how her two kids will eat. Moids really can't take care of themselves, I guess.

I guess she really doesn't understand what an algorithm is, since clicking on just a couple videos will give you more of the same. I do predict an increase in traditional Chinese "medicine" focused on the intestines, though. We've had the pregnancy superstitions, the postpartum confinement, the "menopause/hormones" freak-out, the "Becky with the good hair" diet, the low-carb craze, and now we'll get a phase focusing on the intestines.

I would have respect for her if she talked about getting colonoscopies to screen for polyps & cancer, though, especially if it runs in your family. Tom is at the age where this should be done regardless.

No. 353440

>>353316
Exactly. Not to mention the assistant that films her vlogs and bigger ads. She has an army of helpers but pretends to be oh so busy with work. A chronic liar.

>>353381
She definitely didn't tag it. Not even a "paid partnership" sign.

>>353388
>>353421
It's so funny to hear these health concerns from a woman who won't go to yearly check-ups. You can't fix your life and health with diet. Tbf, she already eats very healthy - I'd even say too healthy - despite having an ED. Tom is the one who should be worried not just about cancer, but any health issue but she likes to believe she's the one with serious illnesses or at risk of getting them.

>>353433
Seconding this. For someone who spends most of her time scrolling through reels and tiktoks she's painfully unaware of how the algorithms work, not to mention her obsession with trying and sharing every dubious hack she sees and believing every quack with a podcast.

No. 353496

File: 1753105066990.jpg (434.34 KB, 1080x1874, 20250721115307.jpg)

>>353388
Lmao at her freaking out about colon cancer, pledging to up the fiber intake and cooking pasta bolognese the very next day. She's a joke.(nitpicking)

No. 353513

>>353381
Can you post a cap of the other one not being tagged?

No. 353782

File: 1753269596164.jpg (372.32 KB, 1080x1917, 20250723101057.jpg)

Is it me or she looks pregnant here. Even her boobs are bigger.(tinfoiling, nitpicking)

No. 353801

>>353782
It's just the dress.

No. 353805

File: 1753287360731.jpg (1.7 MB, 2160x2160, 2010401.jpg)

>>353782
She could be hella gasy for all we know, she eats predominantly fiber so I wouldn't be surprised lol But I see what you mean. The same dress looked very different a month ago. Actually I had my suspicions since the reel in the picrel. She looked very stiff as if the waistband of the pants was too tight for her. But it's all speculation on our part.(tinfoiling)



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]