File: 1751681651658.jpg (484.87 KB, 1080x1919, threadpic.jpg)
No. 352161
Previous threads:
>>>/w/325162 >>>/w/291816 >>>/w/257769>>121374>>40202>>22555>>>/w/179758>>>/w/199602>>>/w/209757 Taylor R is a “hardworking” “self-made” “successful” former model and Youtuber from Canada whose main claim to fame used to be copying Dakota’s embarrassing 2012 - 2015 living doll phase. She’s since abandoned this endeavor to copy fellow gold digger Valeria Lipovesky and any other content creator that appears in her tiktok feed.
Her husband, Tom Lip is a successful businessman. One of his companies, MenClub, was exposed for featuring at least 8 underage (age 12-16) girls in skimpy clothing on their site. After news of this spread, Taylor made two videos defending the right of men to ogle children (it’s “cultural”! Don’t like, don’t click!), both of which are now conveniently privated.
Taylor herself has started her own business, TOAT, which is alas "currently on pause", apparently for motherhood reasons.
Ever since her successful carrier(s) faded, she focused on her IVF "journey", more about which can be found in previous threads. After it came her mini lectures about Traditional Chinese medicine and post-partum confinement, presented as universal truth and law.
After a miscarriage - news of which she dumped on an unassuming follower struggling with infertility - she announced her determination to once again fulfill her sacred duty of providing offspring for her infertile husband, this time without help from IVF treatments. Due to the firm belief that they can indeed conceive naturally, she hasn't seen a gynecologist ever since having her son, despite the above-mentioned miscarriage and self-diagnosed hormonal inbalances, opting instead to rely on Chinese medicine and the latest fad diets from dubious wellness gurus.
Currently she's busy recycling and copying years-old trends from tiktok, testing and promoting debunked health gimmicks, and posting sponsored content on Instagram - often undisclosed and featuring her toddler. Every now and then she chooses to overshare about her, her family's and especially her dog's health conditions, usually with disgusting and unnecessary details.
Her YouTube channel is now abandoned and gets updated only if a company is dumb enough to sponsor her videos, hence the lack of new YouTube content.
Beware the resident white knights and stans in the thread. Don't respond to bait and ignore sperges.
Taylor’s Links:
https://www.facebook.com/Taylor.R.Officialhttps://www.instagram.com/taytay_xx/https://www.youtube.com/user/TaylorR1488https://www.tiktok.com/@tay_richardhttps://twitter.com/iamtay_tayhttps://toat.com https://www.instagram.com/toat.co Tom Lip's controversial site for men:
https://www.menclub.hk/Old links (no longer updated):
http://lovetaylor.com/http://www.weibo.com/taylorrichardhttp://lineblog.me/taylor/https://ameblo.jp/iamtaytay/ http://taytay.zipper.jp/ http://www.cchan.tv/clipper/taylor No. 352192
File: 1751722684690.jpg (845.06 KB, 1080x3958, 20250705_153.jpg)
>>352159Oh, she's hellbent on denying the obvious lmao. Thank god anons had receipts and posted them in the previous thread. But I bet she'll stop getting it after the reading the Brazilian lady's comment. She is right in many aspects especially about bleached hair looking shit after keratin - Taylor herself needed an urgent color touch up after the treatment.
(continuing hair nitpicking after farmhand warning) No. 352193
File: 1751724649644.jpg (84.92 KB, 1080x1485, 20250705_2505.jpg)
>>352192i always roll on the floor laughting whenever taylor mentions finances and complains about something being expensive.
girl, you are not fooling anyone. if you can afford and choose to go to one of the most expensive salons for a haircut, you can't complain about the prices.
the salon she went to charges $100+ for a haircut, btw. she lives in a bubble.
(continuing hair nitpicking after farmhand warning) No. 352197
File: 1751726411143.jpg (364.69 KB, 1080x1901, 113120250704123141.jpg)
>>352193Lmao anon she easily payed triple that. She got a haircut to fix her failed attempt at cutting bangs at home, got a coloring session, full head of toner and treatments, and all of that on a whim. She's just acting down-to-earth and relatable for her gullible audience. Tbf, there were some comments about the insane prices of the salon when the reel was just posted but now there's one is left and its among the replies posted above lmao
(continuing hair nitpicking after farmhand warning) No. 352683
>>352161shame she isn't making vlogs anymore.
Planning on watching all of her old vlogs from oldest to newest in the name of sheer nostalgia. Just eyeballing the video archive it seems she has taken down/hidden some vids.
No. 352734
File: 1752487381316.jpg (917.26 KB, 1134x3647, 1752486691387.jpg)
Did you guys catch when she removed this weird link from her bio? I took the screen shot in the first week of July and now it's gone.
No. 352736
File: 1752490396893.jpg (741.2 KB, 1080x2015, 12444220250714.jpg)
>>352734Interesting. I didn't even notice that. I would've assumed she posted it by mistake but it can't be a coincidence, you have to click through so many windows to change your bio.
Nice catch lmao. It could be tied to the recent vacation in Macau btw. Girl even posted their schedule hour by hour. TayTay 20.0 doesn't put so much effort into a post if she's not payed kek
No. 352738
File: 1752492980596.png (787.33 KB, 864x1178, 1000051881.png)
>>352712There's no "tinfoil," he is a focal point of this thread. He is the owner, director, and CEO of MenClub. He also owns BeautyExchange, Studio 54 (a talent agency), and used to own/run Velvet HK. EIG Limited was some other company he had. Some of the companies seem dead, like EIG Limited and Studio 54.
Menclub just featured a high school student (Shirahama Mito, born oct 2006) and used pictures of her dating back at least to early 2024 (red strapless bra pic), possibly earlier. I guess they are back to posting underage girls.
No. 352804
>>352759Well, the point is that after denying anything was wrong, Tom said they would stop featuring girls under 18. But they never stopped, so that was a lie. There have been younger women featured since he said that (discussed in previous threads).
The UK and US do not encourage underage girls to do gravure. Sexualized children are not featured in men's magazines alongside camgirls and porn stars. I think you need to prove what you say about push-up bras and stuff because idk what you are talking about. These girls' cup sizes in
middle school are discussed on MenClub. The article above goes on at length about how she still looks like a child:
>Although "Shirahama Mito" still has a childish face, people may think she is still a little girl. But in fact, her cute baby face is one of the reasons why she became popular so quickly. When she appeared on "Weekly Playboy" in the early years, she was even given the title of "Tottori Prefecture Sister", which further united people's hearts with the geographical relationship. Coupled with her white and smooth skin that reflects light, and her plump figure that she claimed to have made her neck and shoulders ache when she was in elementary school, it is no wonder that some media believe that she is expected to "unify" the entire photo industry! I wonder if you are willing to be ruled by her?I'm not a specialist on men's wank mags but I don't that's not typical discussion in mainstream Western men's media.
The easiest solution for all of this would have been to fire the perv who writes all the "girls" entries. He also wrote the gross articles about why it's good to date underage girls (they have since been deleted but were archived in previous threads). Tom has chosen not to get rid of this man.
No. 352865
>>352846That was their justification back in the day - he's not the editor, he can't change what gets published but even if he were "it's a cultural difference, don't like, don't look"
vomit But he owns the magazine, that's for sure.
No. 352883
File: 1752587779852.jpg (549.81 KB, 900x1600, 1000051936.jpg)
>>352878I seriously can't believe we now have to prove the fact that he owns/runs MenClub to people like you, who seem unaware that Taylor herself posted two videos defending her moid's business decisions as they pertain to this magazine. He started this business back in 2012 and hasn't "worked his way up." He was always in charge of it. I do not know if his ownership percentage is public information, but why does that matter? He never ever denied owning, running, or being responsible for this magazine.
Here is Tom's own post on the subject, indicating that he had one post deleted and directed his editorial team to not post little girls anymore, even though he doesn't find anything wrong with it.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BuFStgMlHTF/?igsh=MThtem5wZm9iaXE4dg==picrel: Conversation between Tom and a HK guy about underage models promoted on MC (which Tom never denies owning).
No. 352884
File: 1752588617915.jpg (452.35 KB, 839x1600, 1000051944.jpg)
>>352883doubleposting to give a link to Taylor's second video about her husband's business
>>233373In the transcript (picrel), she says that he is the boss and that he is responsible for the content, even if he personally doesn't write it.
No. 352927
>>352738Thanks nonna for listing the companies. I did find something about Velvet HK being the company behind Mensclub. Yeah good idea to just put that in the thread intro. Do I really need to scroll back multiple threads for something essential to the thread. Which I did scroll back btw but if it’s burried in a screenshot I can’t textsearch a screenshot. So that’s why I couldn’t find it.
The velvet company looks dead you say, is it because they need to renew their company registration?
No. 352946
>>352927They registered Tom's shady magazine under Taylor's now dead business, link for newfags
>>113531. And all of his businesses are listed one under another. May be that why Sherlock-newfag couldn't find shit about the businesses.
This was extensively discussed ages ago. Spoonfeed link for newfags - read from
>>113385 onwards.
All I did was search Toat and MenClub in older threads, btw, it took me less than ten minutes to find these, so, no, it's not hard to find, you lazies.
>>352935Anon, just a couple of posts above yours there are screenshots of him defending his sleazy magazine and its disgusting content. What more proof do you need?
No. 352948
>>352930>>352935Both of you are idiots, sorry. He got rich from BeautyExchange and started MenClub after that. He has an origin story for BE and for Velvet because neither of those were started to titillate men. I don't think his idea for an HK Hustler needed a big story.
>Investors are needed at some point.He has ad sponsorships (ties that began with BeautyExchange) and has a bunch of wealthy friends. But you're free to look up who his investors are.
He was directly interviewing women to work for him at BeautyExchange, and they turned up to the interviews in schoolgirl outfits. I'd say he's pretty damn involved in his businesses. Proof:
>>113071 (article link about interviews)
>>113072 (photo from article)
more about early Menclub here
>>23085>>129120 No. 352950
File: 1752618589916.jpg (1.25 MB, 2160x3840, 1000051954.jpg)
I found some 2010 photos of Tom allegedly talking about BeautyExchange. I don't think they've ever been posted. He really doesn't know how to dress for a business event, but interestingly enough he also doesn't dress like a poor person. Just like a douche.
No. 353172
File: 1752797642025.jpg (124.91 KB, 1080x702, IMG_051207.jpg)
And here's the answer about the mysterious Japan vlog. I suppose it will never get restored or posted.
No. 353196
>>353174People expect stuff within reasonable time frames. You can't tease a vlog for three months, then post nothing and expect people to not ask questions.
I hardly think they're coming anyway kek It's July, she won't post a winter vlog in summer.
No. 353307
File: 1752911651779.png (1.1 MB, 864x1446, 1000052025.png)
>>353277There have been plenty of ads she edited using her computer. 4.5 months after her trip, the computer seems to be working, and it's been seen in other stories I didn't cap. idk why you think not posting stuff makes her excuse true. She has no tech abilities so she doesn't need to spend time recovering files, she will just hire someone to recover files (like most people would), and there are thousands of such people in HK.
No. 353316
>>353196>she won't post a winter vlog in summerShe had no problems uploading Levi's first birthday vlog half a year late because she had sudden and one time only "anxiety" about posting on YouTube lmao You never know what genius justifications can her bird brain create.
>>353307Exactly! She's bullshitting as always. Plus, the "look at me working on the computer, editing stuff" is just for show. She has at least one editor and she disclosed that herself, so no idea why she's now pretending to be some teach-savvy and an editor.
No. 353381
File: 1752998960220.png (1.03 MB, 864x1474, 1000052036.png)
>>353373>anons say she haswhat's your problem? she has them, look at her account for "ad" and "paid partnership." The trip.com link in her bio was another sponsorship.
Based on the face close-ups and date, it looks like she is editing the Charlotte Tilbury ad, which she didn't seem to mark as an ad unless I missed that (but it 100% is one).
No. 353388
File: 1753013999596.jpg (804.46 KB, 1080x1903, IMG_20250720_071750.jpg)
She's going nuts, I'm telling you. The possibility of Tom getting diabetes in the upcoming couple of years is a billion times higher than her or him getting colon cancer from not eating enough fiber.
No. 353421
File: 1753048987305.jpg (400.99 KB, 1080x2006, CDC colon cancer.jpg)
>>353388Who's gonna tell her Tom has the higher risk due to his age, sex, fat and lifestyle kek Unless you ate exclusively ultra-processed red meat and zero fiber "in the 90s", you're not at risk, princess TayTay.
Link to CDC on colon cancer risk factors.
https://www.cdc.gov/colorectal-cancer/risk-factors/index.html No. 353433
>>353388>I am upping my family's fiber intake immediately kek it sounds like she's a single mother deciding how her two kids will eat. Moids really can't take care of themselves, I guess.
I guess she really doesn't understand what an algorithm is, since clicking on just a couple videos will give you more of the same. I do predict an increase in traditional Chinese "medicine" focused on the intestines, though. We've had the pregnancy superstitions, the postpartum confinement, the "menopause/hormones" freak-out, the "Becky with the good hair" diet, the low-carb craze, and now we'll get a phase focusing on the intestines.
I would have respect for her if she talked about getting colonoscopies to screen for polyps & cancer, though, especially if it runs in your family. Tom is at the age where this should be done regardless.
No. 353440
>>353316Exactly. Not to mention the assistant that films her vlogs and bigger ads. She has an army of helpers but pretends to be oh so busy with work. A chronic liar.
>>353381She definitely didn't tag it. Not even a "paid partnership" sign.
>>353388>>353421It's so funny to hear these health concerns from a woman who won't go to yearly check-ups. You can't fix your life and health with diet. Tbf, she already eats very healthy - I'd even say too healthy - despite having an ED. Tom is the one who should be worried not just about cancer, but any health issue but she likes to believe
she's the one with serious illnesses or at risk of getting them.
>>353433Seconding this. For someone who spends most of her time scrolling through reels and tiktoks she's painfully unaware of how the algorithms work, not to mention her obsession with trying and sharing every dubious hack she sees and believing every quack with a podcast.
No. 353496
File: 1753105066990.jpg (434.34 KB, 1080x1874, 20250721115307.jpg)
>>353388Lmao at her freaking out about colon cancer, pledging to up the fiber intake and cooking pasta bolognese the very next day. She's a joke.
(nitpicking) No. 353782
File: 1753269596164.jpg (372.32 KB, 1080x1917, 20250723101057.jpg)
Is it me or she looks pregnant here. Even her boobs are bigger.(tinfoiling, nitpicking)
No. 353805
File: 1753287360731.jpg (1.7 MB, 2160x2160, 2010401.jpg)
>>353782She could be hella gasy for all we know, she eats predominantly fiber so I wouldn't be surprised lol But I see what you mean. The same dress looked very different a month ago. Actually I had my suspicions since the reel in the picrel. She looked very stiff as if the waistband of the pants was too tight for her. But it's all speculation on our part.
(tinfoiling)