[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/w/ - vloggers, lolita, cosplay

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1496953688251.jpg (106.85 KB, 834x960, 0c1096d2e3ad8eec524887525fc409…)

No. 22555

New Taylor R. Thread because person in the jvlogger thread is to stupid/lazy to make one themselves.

Elbow-san's name revealed. Taylor remains boring and not really worth a thread of her own. Recently took copy-cat pics of herself in Kardashian style. No one liked it. People with hate boners still whining about cheek fillers (which no one cares about)

That's all the "milk" from her recently.

Previous thread: >>222185

This is a containment thread. It does not move to the top when posted in. Please report it if there is any actual drama worth letting the thread bump.

No. 22556

Reeeposting from the last thread

No. 22557

>>22555
Shes still boring as ever i see

No. 22558

>>22556
gotta milk the kardashian name and buzzfeed copycat vids

No. 22559

She is plastic like the kardashians

No. 22560

>>22555
>not really worth a thread of her own

Admin specifically asked to keep taylor discussion in her own thread, why bother making a new one if you're going to post a bitter summary with no links.

No. 22561

mods autosage threads that have no new milk, you are evading the rules by creating a new one

No. 22562

>>22556
While watching this (cringy af) video I was thinking "elbow-san must love her a lot" and then she said "how many times did you want to leave me?" He was completely silent lol so awkward

No. 22563

OP description is shit, at least say what she is: a literal whore.

No. 22564

Somebody capable make a new thread pls, so I can hide this shitty one

No. 22565

OP:

If there is nothing new or interesting then don't make a thread. In her case, just use the Jvlogger's thread instead?

Relevant new rules:

>- Proposed: In times of zero milk, when a thread is mostly speculation, it could be put on autosage until a moderator undoes this when there's fresh drama.


>- Nitpicking, armchair psychology, and absolutely baseless speculating must be saged and kept under control. Endless tinfoiling about e.g. Taylor's or Dakota's income or specific shade of hair color must stop and will be punished.



>- Hellweek starts tomorrow. This means strict moderation and lots of temporary bans.


>- For example, all posts that only consist of "hi [cow]" or "lol" or "underrated post" will be removed and punished with a short ban.

No. 22566

Taylor really doesn't need her own thread imo, but she really needs to ditch the Kylie lip kits. Those dark brown colors are hideous.

No. 22567

>>22556
worst video yet. but it is getting views faster than usual. that clickbait title does work i guess.

No. 22568

>>22563
calm down sperg-chan

No. 22569

This is a containment thread. It does not move to the top when posted in. Please report it if there is any actual drama worth letting the thread bump. No further discussion about the necessity of this thread is needed. If you have complaints, make a report, don't shit up the thread.

No. 22570

File: 1497219625285.png (794.78 KB, 1920x1080, Screenshot_20170611-143312.png)

Moneybag-san is my new hero

No. 22571

Taylorrr's French is so laughably bad. Can't Taylor get one of her admiring fans to check over her script, or is she too lazy even for that? Quelle for "What?" Turned it off immediately. So lazy.

No. 22572

>>22571
That's the whole point of that character…

I do really like her new hair though.

No. 22573

>>22570
those were subtitles for rosies barking

No. 22574

>>22572
I thought the point is for the character to have a terrible accent but occasionally use French words/phrases that a French person would use. A French person would not say "Quelle" if someone called out to them or asked for help. It makes no sense.

No. 22575

>>22570
I hope that her getting her hair dyed is a dig at Kaka.

No. 22576

>>22574

if youre that bothered by taylor's stupid french jokes that youre thinking about them that analytically and willing to correct her google translate french then you need something funner than lolcow, its just a joke

No. 22577

>>22570
She's so witchy looking in normal lighting. Like one of those vegan white girls who still get acne in their 40's.

No. 22578

>>22576
Holy shit, she's from Canada, where French is a common second language, and does fuck-all every day. I think anon's point is valid. She could fucking ask someone instead of looking yet again like an airhead.

No. 22579

>>22578
Hey hey hey. You don't need brains when you've got looks.

No. 22580

File: 1497272787359.png (474.66 KB, 472x602, Screen Shot 2017-06-12 at 9.01…)

>>22570

I reeaaallllyyy don't see a difference, or much of a difference in her hair … How was this a huge change ? huge risk ? She went even blonder then that in her HK dolly days..

She's like a 13 yr old from the 60s where showing belly button and mildly dying your hair was "edgy".

No. 22581

>>22578
I think you're missing the joke, it's supposed to be bad

No. 22582

>>22580
could she stick out her chest any further

No. 22583

>>22582
There was a point in her one vlog where she kept her camera focused on her chest for longer than necessary.

No. 22584

I will never ever understand why a girl who started out as pretty as Taylor would want to turn herself into some disgusting goddamn ugly weeb doll.

Fuck anime and fuck Japan.

No. 22585

>>22577
She doesn't eat plant-based, and yes, hormonal acne is a thing at any age.

>>335176

Well, she is doing that because she wants to prioritize her health and show her viewers how to do it in a foreign country/ encourage them

No. 22586

>>335157
Do you view all the people by their color and origins?

No. 22587

>>22579
She looks like every basic white girl, I've seen prettier she's average.

No. 22588

>>22587
I know. But you know, when she can't do as well in her home country where there are plenty better than her, she goes to a place where they put her on a pedestal(Asia).

Failed whites go to Asia to model lmao. I mean even Kooters is getting gigs and she's really not much to look at.

Actually I think it's genius. There's no way she'd get an insanely rich guy with her average looks in Canada but in Asia where they're thirsty and do have a lot of money…

No. 22589

I'm so confused at her newest video, why she insists on doing skits/scripted "funnies" it's beyond me. She's not good at acting, it's so forced and the second hand awkwardness is unbearable :/

No. 22590

>>22589
Some parts were obviously scripted, but the parts that weren't were painfully awkward (like when she suddenly jumps on that girl for a piggy back or when she leans back in the swan boat).

No. 22591

File: 1499409002388.png (577.2 KB, 1038x354, ddddddddddddddddd.png)

As a fan of Taylor's videos her content changed drastically since the Kim K viral blow up. It's become more buzzfeed/clickbait/American humor when I originally followed for chill casey-like vlogs. Casey's vlogs suck now so I really looked forward to hers and it's just disappointing.

No. 22592

>>22591
Same here!! I don't even want to click on the videos anymore because the titles suck so much and the content in the past ones was terrible… And she's not even uploading daily anymore, why can't she put more effort into them? Such a let down.

No. 22593

>>22592
in her recent video she mentioned that her bc(she's taking to counteract her acne) has been messing with her daily life so that could be a reason for it.

I think she, in her own mind, is putting more effort in to her videos with these special videos but I just miss her chill vlogs

No. 22594

>>22593
I agree, even back in the day I only ever watched her vlogs and never her "main videos" as she calls them. I loved her vlogs up until this last vlogmas started (so like 7 months ago) and then her videos started going downhill for me. Didn't even bother watching the relationship now/then or whatever video she just put up. I don't find her humor funny, personally. Depending on the next video she might finally get an unsub from me!

No. 22595

File: 1500329561397.png (840.25 KB, 1625x680, Untitled.png)

I don't see anyone mentioning this but what's up with her instagram profile pic? Considering her aesthetic, this is very weird and kinda gross.

No. 22596

>>22595
It fits her aesthetic because it fits her humour. She's not trying to be a model, she's trying to be funny.

No. 22597

Samefag but this video was good imo. She's being very honest about her contact lenses and that she turned down any modeling offers where she wasn't allowed to wear them or do her own eye-makeup. She also mentions that it really hurt her eyes over time etc.

She looks so much better this way.

No. 22598

>>22595
It's from one of her videos

No. 22599

>>22597
It's the end of her dolly era, kinda savage how she's openly reading all the things her early fans liked about her
She pretty much admitted she killed her modelling career, I wonder if she hopes to keep up earning as this new comedy sketch persona or if she has something else in the pipeline?

>>22594
>>22593
Same anon, OT but are there any other youtubers with that chill Casey vibe?

No. 22600

>>22599
I'm glad she realises and talks about how ridiculous, fabricated and toxic her doll phase was. What she doesn't seem to realise is that her sketch/comedy persona is just as much of a facade/character.

The "I'm intelligent" and "I've got things to teach you" bit made me laugh. While I can enjoy her vlogs for their relaxed, carefree vibe, intelligence isn't one of her assets. Remember when she tried to get philosophical after going to a Yayoi Kusuma exposition? It was like a balloon slowly deflating. Just empty air. Her "deep conversations" always come off as empty. She stays on the surface of things and can't seem to go deeper. She isn't a critical thinker either, she just gobbles up what she reads and see.

Granted, she isn't the dumbest around, but I would definitely not try to brand myself as intelligent if I was her.

No. 22601

>>22597
I stopped watching her vids for a while but decided to click on this one to see if it was clickbait. I think this definitely makes her a more likeable person, her only problem now is being cringy

No. 22602

>>22599
Killed what exactly? Her bf can just get her jobs, she doesn't need any look or skills or whatever.

No. 22603

>>22602
In her video she says people won't work with her anymore because of how difficult she was with her contacts and make up.

No. 22604

I typically love her Canada vloggs as I find her brother both funny and really cute … But is it just me or are they really annoyed with her in this vlogg ?

Also, it would seem her cheek fillers have made a unwanted return. To bad those couldn't have been apart of the old her she would give up.

No. 22605

File: 1501184858868.png (304.33 KB, 555x431, Screen Shot 2017-07-27 at 2.06…)

>>22604

(samefag)

She needs to stop.. They look like shit.

No. 22606

>>36069
Ironic how she stop wearing contacts once kooters took hers out? I give 1 month she stop doing ageyo sal and wearing natural makeup.

No. 22607

File: 1501220510198.png (295.22 KB, 928x410, 1500811851014.png)

>>22606
Nothing to do with Koots. Why would it.
It's not like either are competing with each other anymore.

No. 22608

Didn't someone leak the adress where Taylor and TomLip-san are living?

No. 22609

How about we mass spam her video comments with:

TOM LIP, CEO OF BEAUTYEXCHANGE IS ELBOW-SAN!

No. 22610

>>22608
>>22609
What's wrong with you?

No. 22611

Her latest video is horrible, her sexualising and exploiting her brother and all the 13 year old viewers are commenting "Oh he is so hot", "I think I have a crush on your brother".

This makes me so uncomfortable. :/

No. 22612

>>22611
Lmfao her brother is not a minor and an attention whore, he's clearly into it. Remember the last time she was there how he kept showing his crotch?

No. 22613

>>22612

He rather seems annoyed than enjoying it this time.

No. 22614

>>22609

I think this is fair tbh, to wake up her followers who still belive every shitty lie she tells them.

No. 22615

>>22608
>>22609
>>22614
So much fucking autism.

No. 22616

Anyone else get who thinks the Canada vlogs are so boring and much worse than the Japan vlogs, in terms of quality and content?

No. 22617

>>22609
No only a childish, no life, and obsessive person would do that. Nobody cares enough for tay to waste their time doing that.

No. 22618

>>22616
yea its been boring, just look at the view counts, its lesser than her japanese vlogs.

No. 22619

He's so awkward and out of place lol.

https://instagram.com/p/BXp4qzIjjDK/

No. 22620

>>22619
>Posting an url instead of an image on an imageboard
How dense are you, motherfucker?

No. 22621

>>22619
i dont understand how he is out of place, he's just being silly like rest of them… ugly as hell, yes, but not out of place

No. 22622

>>22620
To be fair, anon linked to a gif

No. 22623

>>22619

He looks like an asian dad… and she looks like a 18yr old.

>>22621

Fucking ugly indeed.

No. 22624

I just don't get why she vlogs about the events she gets invited to because of her bf as if she's done anything to legitimately be invited to so many big fancy events. Most of them are BE which tom's the CEO of. Far from legitimate if you ask me. I also don't know why the topic of BE's promotion of her brand in general went without being brought up. He used his platform on several occasions as you can see by simply googling beauty exchange with Taylor r's name in the query. Yet she still pretends to be so independent. I feel as though this is the real reason her and tom don't wan't people knowing what he looks like, or his name. But I may also be interpreting this wrong. Just a thought.

No. 22625

>>22624

People know what he looks like, just not his name. He is also the owner of BE, not the CEO.


Man, I just never thought home girl had it in her, to fuck her way to the top and sleep with her boss.

No. 22626

Home girl obviously has it in her X'D
I mean I'm not one to judge I don't blame her, but lie about it? It didn't even get her to the top, thats the ironic part, Just got her a middle rate youtube career, and you can tell the girl is more money hungry, and not content with having more than enough already. I call it privilege, others call it what they will.
Also we know his name, but she did make a point to keep it hidden, thats what counts.

No. 22627

Unless Tom Lip is an alias.

No. 22628

>>22626
>>372255
>X'D
Try to lurk more.

No. 22629

>>22619

He looks like her dad holy shit. Taylor never struck me as the type of person to date someone who looks so much older than her. Honestly looks like a sugar daddy/baby type relationship.

No. 22630

anyone know why Elbowsan's holding a baby in his linkedin profile?

No. 22631

>>22626

She didn't get huge fame, but she found a sugar daddy ?? rich bf to pay her bills and filler replacements. Besides she does get a decent amount of attention ( 300k IG followers and 625k subs )

>>372255


They're all about shitting on her, but rather not tarnish his name or job so they keep his name off their site. To an extent I get it, but I also highly doubt a tiny gossip site would even put a dent in his rep/career.

>>22629

Money is all she wants so why wouldn't she date uggo ?

What materialistic bitch wouldn't fuck and date a 40yr old uggo for a 5k purse and yearly trips to paris. Girl is hella pampered, and probably hung onto her ugly dolly look in fear he'd ditch her for another girl. ( Though with his money he could prob find better )

>>22630

Probably his sisters/families kid. Taylor has made vloggs of visiting his family in which they had kids.

No. 22632

>>22624
Work hard at sucking the right dick for your dreams, darling~!

No. 22633

How old was Taylor when she started the dolly style? she said in her circle lenses video that she's been wearing them for "5 or 6 years", but that's gotta be a lie. pictures of her show she looked completely normal until 2013 when she went full blown kooter overnight.

No. 22634

>>22633
2012 was when she started wearing them. Maybe not for jobs but probably in her personal life and definitely on camera. But she had been doing Liz Lisa style since late 2010-2011ish I think.
This article is from 2012 and she's clearly wearing circles in it, albeit not giant ones.
http://rocketnews24.com/2012/09/08/246971/

No. 22635

>>22634

Sooo… She actually did the dolly thing before Kooters ? Or roughly the same time ?

I always thought she started long after Dakota started with it, since it was always insinuated that she copied Kota.

No. 22636

File: 1503713004272.jpg (104.8 KB, 505x1010, 03bz17pz.jpg)

>>22635
I don't know. I certainly think in 2013, she went full throttle with the dolly look, but there was nothing really that different from what gyaru had been doing from 2008 onwards. Getting into Liz Lisa (which was available in HK) and brands like that, it's not that surprising I guess. I doubt she she was consciously thinking "dolly" at first, but naturally gravitated towards girly styles.
This was in a report from 2012 and here she definitely wearing Liz Lisa style. She's also wearing circles here.

No. 22637

>>22636

She kinda reminds me of Kaka here with the resting bitch face and terrible makeup. She looks like she wants to cut a bitch.

Perhaps they both started liking the same fashion at the same time unaware of one another, but once Kota's popularity took off and went national .. maybe thats when Taylor decided to copy. Not in a malicious way like Kaka liked to imply though. Taylor's always seemed to be a sponge absorbing and copying whatever is trending at the time ( Kardashian's, Kota ect )

I kinda miss her old fashion even if childish looking. As of lately it just looks like she is wearing the same few tops and I swear to fucking go the same bloody jeans every day… Its just not very eye catching or flattering for someone with her body shape. ( flat all around )

No. 22638

>>22637
Well It's a candid, basically a paparazzi shot. She really doesn't look anything like Kaka. Like I said, all Taylor had to do was look in a gyaru fashion magazine or even Vivi to find that look. Sorry but it really bugs that Koots gets credit for a look that was popular among gals when she was still doing shitty scene make-up. Not saying Tay is original (she's absolutely not) but Koots isn't either.
Yeah I'm not a fan of Tay's current look at all. I wish she was more creative. Personally I'd love to see her do a kind of modern mod look. It would be girly which suits her, but also grown up enough to be sophisticated. Or even Larme style might work for her.

No. 22639

File: 1503754353262.jpg (1.22 MB, 1600x1199, IMG_9381.JPG)

>>22634
Damn, even though these images are heavily edited they look so so much more normal. That operation to change her jaw shape and all the fillers make her look so inhuman now.

She should stop before she looks like Michael Jackson.

No. 22640

>>22638

Regardless there still was a point where it felt like there was some copying. I never said the style was Kota's, but Taylor sure af went hard on it once Kota's popularity peaked. Then there was the weird video styles she started cranking out with her stiff as a board on a bed with a high pitch voice wit pink bed sheets.

People didn't start assuming she was copying until she cut her hair(straight bangs),moved to Japan, made stiff videos in a small apartment, high pitch voice, After effects, went full out dolly. Everything Kota does..

No. 22641

>>22639
I swear there is this one samefag who keeps casually mentioning Taylor getting fillers as a proven thing in unrelated threads, and now they are trying to make it seem like she even had jaw surgery. I swear it's the same anon who wanted to spam her videos with autistic shit. Vendetta much?

No. 22642

>>22640
Oh yes, the copying was really blatent and obvious: some of it was creepy as hell. Poses, hairstyles. She did a copy of Kota's banner pic (the one where Kota shooped off her ears). There was a period of time where she was trying to show that she was better than Dakota.

I even suspect she started her PULL thread (on the oldest version of PULl, she was in the "pretty girls" section). The initial post was about this amazing dolly girl who was just like Dakota but ~nice~.

Given elbow-san's industry, he may have encouraged her to copy Kota. He certainly knows about marketing young women to a waiting audience.

No. 22643

>>22641
Yup. I've noticed that too. Won't comment on the fillers but the jaw stuff is just stupid. In her most recent pictures her jaw looks the same as it always has in candids. She naturally has strong jaw and a small chin. It fits her face.

No. 22644

>>22642
>I even suspect she started her PULL thread.

Being this fucking stupid.

No. 22645

>>22642

No, Tom wouldn't encourage her to copy Kota, and matter of fact encouraged her to make dance videos and leave the house unlike Kota. As a business man he's smart enough to know not to copy someone else's image and ideas down to a T.

Taylor being as uncreative and boring as she is just copies who ever is trending and most popular. Like her blatantly copying Kota, then Casey, Buzzfeed and many others. She's a leech that depends on others ideas, and gets away with it only because people think she's pretty.

>>22643

The jaw comments make me think they're from PULL. Only place I've seen the mention of her having possible surgery like that, though, I do think she probably gets Botox.

No. 22646

>>22643
Hm I am undecided on that topic. Do you think she usually edits her face to look slimmer or more pointy?

No. 22647

File: 1503798879155.png (142.51 KB, 269x270, Screen Shot 2017-07-05 at 10.2…)

>>22646

Not the anon your talking too, but she has used After Effects if you remember her video from when Rosie first arrived in Japan and how holy fucking wobbly her face was. PULL from my understanding speculates that she still occasionally uses it, probably when she feels her jaw looks to noticeable in videos. ( where its harder to control the angles.

Her face is significantly more meaty in person/candids. ( pic related )

No. 22648

>>22644
She wasn't in the snowflake section of pull in 2013-2014. Everyone loved her then, no one even mentioned fillers or jaw crap. Really different vibe.

I don't think she started her thread, but the theory isn't completely crazy.

No. 22649

>>22648
Pretty recently someone on PULL admitted to making the original thread and it was pretty long time poster. They also said they regretted it.

No. 22650

>>22641
I smell selfpost for controversy. Calm down and don't attack people who believe in her having something done. Some believe it some don't, get over it. This is obsessive.

No. 22651

>>22647
Thanks!
I was rather asking everyone, not a specific person. And I really cannot put my finger on it but something her face seems to have changed, maybe it is the makeup, maybe After Effects. But I really do not know how to tell the different indicators for editing, makeup or some beauty procedures apart.

No. 22652

>>22634
>>22635
>>22636
2012 is the year Dakota blew up and touched her peak. it's also the year that Venus, Valeria and Anastasia did too, and the "living doll" trend was born. if there's no prior photos of Taylor wearing circle lenses, then I guess 2012 is answer for when she started. maybe she got the years mixed in her video when she said 5-6 years, and it's actually been 4.

No. 22653

>>22649
she would have been posted eventually anyway. PULL always had that "kota clones" thread for any and every girl who had light brown/blonde hair, blunt bangs, circle lenses, dead stare and jfashion. And Taylor.. (i'm not a regular her threads so sorry if this a controversial thing to say but) she was the biggest fucking kota clone of all time. the only one that could legit be confused for her in some photos/videos until you did a double take. and that's saying a lot considering she doesn't look anything like her when neither are wearing their fake crap.

No. 22654

File: 1504096956601.png (639.51 KB, 903x594, Screen Shot 2017-08-30 at 8.40…)

What do people think of Taylor's hideous Merch ?

No. 22655

File: 1504108687351.jpg (190.5 KB, 980x737, 1408712071532.jpg)

>>22652
2012-2017 is 5ish years depending on when in 2012 she started doing it.\
>>22653
>she was the biggest fucking kota clone of all time
Really? Even compared to this chick?
>>>/snow/65297
Picture related.

No. 22656

>>22655

dif anon, but holy fuck yes it was creepy when KittyPhina ( Sarah ) popped up.

I'm actually shocked that Kaka didn't sperg about it, unless she knew Sarah wasn't a threat. Regardless, Sarah apologized and then changed her shoop style to something much nicer.

Could it be that they all just stole looks/styles/shoop/ideas from one another at some point ? and maybe leave it at that. They're all now starting to branch in their own directions.

No. 22657

>>22654
This is some of the ugliest merch I have ever seen. I can't believe people are gonna buy this shit… and it is so overpriced.

Is this an inside from one of her sketch bits that are just too cringey for me to go through? Or is this just Taylor yet again copying memes like the "are these x or x" pictures (corgi's butt or loafs of bread)?


In her last vlog she seemed so excited and made such a big deal about her so called "clothing line". She is delusional. I always thought she was a bit childish but as of lately I feel like she's a 10 y/o. Her jokes, the way she talks (especially when she tries to get into those "deep conversations" yet can't leave the surface) and acts just comes off as incredibly childish. I guess that's what happens when you haven't come across any hardship, not even a low level job, in your life.

No. 22658

>>22657

dunno why she calls it a clothing line when its 2 hideous over priced pairs of PJs and nothing else.

She said it was doing really well and people are buying like crazy in her recent video…

Are people actually buying that shit ? or is she once again over exaggerating ?

No. 22659

File: 1508203198415.jpg (37.35 KB, 275x185, 1425781458149.jpg)

>>22655
month late, but yes, even compared to her. Even Taylor (much respect) pretty much admitted to the whole thing without specifically saying Dakota's name. Once in her circle lenses video and the other was her "reacting to old videos" one.

Sarah might have re-constructed her photos, but Taylor reconstructed her life, even moving to Japan and admitting to losing modeling opportunities because she wanted to stick with her new "look".

No. 22660

Is it true that Taylor is leaving japan too? I saw a post in the JVloggers thread that said she was leaving along with a few others.

No. 22661

>>22660

she's expressed eventually she well, but they are at the very least in for another year because of her lease

No. 22662

I have a real issue with how Taylor edits her videos and walks around doing nothing when the title is "Why Am I Leaving?" I watched the whole video and didn't get anything of substance her previous video didn't already state. It's just a lot of looking at Halloween decorations and then awkwardly packing to ~sad piano tunes~.

No. 22663

>>22662
I'm subbed, but I get so bored when she doesn't address her title or just talks to the camera for ten minutes. I really wish she put more work into her videos. Her fashion ones are kind of decent work, but not enough of it.

No. 22664

she moved to Hong Kong!

No. 22665

>>22664
I think she lives in or around Tai Koo (I recognize the mall where she was recording). Her place is spacious for HK standards.

No. 22666

>>22665
They're only there temporarily tho, the house they bought is not finished yet

No. 22667

She got a lot of attention after the nose eyelash extension video and her views grew but I think she's getting more and more boring. Also I don't comprehend how her boyfriend stands her.

No. 22668

She was smart to not mention this until she moved away. Someone was probably trying to confirm her address and hoped she would mention the tape on her door in a blog or tweet.

No. 22669

Well, at least shes honest about how ridiculous she can be, im rather lost for words

No. 22670

>>22669
As someone who has been to those limited edition events, I can relate with spending a ridiculous amount of money on shit you don't really want. It's a high-school like pressure for fitting in and you end up just feeling bad regardless.
She can turn a big profit on those items, tho. At least in the Tommy Hilfiger sweatshirt.

No. 22671

>>22670

i can understand it to an extent, peer pressure happens, buyers remorse happens, but those numbers are still madness… hope she sells them and gets some money back

No. 22672

I googlet Tom Lip and found his facebook page, and you can search from his friends to find that there's one Tay For there with the same birthday as Taylor actually has. So it's quite possible that the fb page actually belongs to him.

No. 22673

Her vlogmas intro is the scariest thing I've seen in 2017.

No. 22674

>>22673
I thought itcwas cute to be honest

No. 22675

>>22674
The dead, soulless eyes? Lack of any smile? Weird, unnatural movements? Rosie looking like a furry football? Uncanny valley feel throughout?

At least her cheeks were accurately represented.

No. 22676

I saw people on PULL praising her for this as a unique idea but she just edited the recent feather and crown eyebrows that were making their rounds on Twitter. I wish she would stop trying so hard to go viral, I miss her Casey-clone days.

No. 22677

File: 1512764959554.png (541.62 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_20171208-202702.png)

>>22676
Saw this today, and they completely credited her.

Its such a ugly trend though…

No. 22678

She finally admitted her age

No. 22679

>>22678
That is really good. She is still cringy af but she is being a lot more honest about those things, I can admire that. Although, I'd think one would be proud to look like her at 29.

No. 22680

Dafuq, she doesn’t know that WWIII hasn’t happened and about (the Canadian involvement in the) Normandy.

I guess when your sugar daddy is a millionaire you don’t need basic education. Worshipping the Kardashians is much more important anyway. /s

No. 22681

File: 1515853609679.png (474 KB, 610x652, asdfsf.png)

I don't understand why she insist on dressing like that. She has a nice body..

No. 22682

>>22681
It looks comfortable and expensive. I hate athleisure but she pulls it off. But, as people pointed out, it's probably for some upcoming godawful video.

I thought her boyfriend looked pretty ancient in the holiday snaps. I know he is older, but they really almost look like father/adopted daughter, partially because of Taylor's style.

No. 22683

>>22676
Saw this while searching for lash extension "results" from a place in London.

https://www.pintaram.com/u/lashbar_london/1663819144761471924_3483115622

Let's guess whether Taylor actually got her lashes or eyebrows done there or is even associated with them…hmmm

No. 22684

She's gotta be way underweight. Hell my BMI is in the underweight range and I'm not that skinny.

No. 22685

>>22684
Oh definitely, she looks like a BMI 17 or so
But she models in Asia so that's not surprising

No. 22686

>>22685
It's ok to be borderline anorexic as long as you're a model

and yeah, I mean, she admits it's not natural. I hate how often she talks about herself as flabby or big or whatever. It was even in her 2017 rewind.

No. 22687

File: 1520096957531.jpeg (7.64 KB, 225x225, ceo.jpeg)

Anyone else notice that Tom owns beauty exchange and basically gave her the bulk of her exposure? I went all the way back to when she first moved to hong kong and there Taylor is, in a massively popular BE article promoting her. Seems more likely that's the reason she doesn't want people knowing exactly who her bf is since he helped her career so much it doesn't fit with her "work hard for your dreams" persona when you're dating someone with so much social media influence before you made it yourself. Also all those events she gets "invited to" personally as a part of her modelling career are just basically business dinners she's attending along side Tom… so clearly she's purposely bending the truth in her favor to look more hard working and successful than she really is and to promote her "brand" This could be old news though i just couldn't find the energy to read the entire thread LOL(read the rules & usage info)

No. 22688

She finally admits it was all a lie. Makeup, lighting, camera that alters your face shape in real time, facetune, etc.

No. 22689

She's the most respectable cow imo

No. 22690


No. 22691

Taylor finally got an assistant.. for what exactly? She doesn't even run errands, just holds the camera (and sucks at it thats why they had to buy an stabilizer). How lazy can you be?

No. 22692

>>22688
Subtle dig at lolcow when she says she knows who made the gif? I enjoyed her honesty and the nostalgia in this video

>>22691
It's weird hearing her assistant talking from behind the camera, especially when they don't seem to really know each other well, it makes the assistant seem more like the blogger and tay is the Sharla-like friend on show

No. 22693

File: 1521945390745.jpg (Spoiler Image,124.65 KB, 750x1201, girl.jpg)

She took picture with this girl who happens to be the editor of beauty exchange who was at the paris event she was just at. Just kinda tells me that BE is who got invited to the event as a company hence why tom was there. Not sure why she'd lie and say "omg i have no idea why someone like me would be invited to a beauty guru event" when she wasn't she was the businesses +1 just like the editor girl was.(read the rules & usage info)

No. 22694

think its interesting how she has gotten a comment under her newest instagram pic (the one in the red thing "Last Night") saying sth like "the way you're showing your wealth gets out of hand taylor…" (sth similar like this)and a day later it has been deleted. Seems like she rly tries to hide this topic in fornt of her fanbase

No. 22695

>>22693
I think it's more like BE is the team documenting her on that trip. One girl was there to take photos of Taylor and the rest of the HK "influencers" No7, etc.

>>22694
Comment's still there. It just got lost in all of the others.

No. 22696

Why can’t Taylor just be a part of the Jvlogger threads? Everything has died down now.

No. 22697

>>22696
Because she's not a jvlogger anymore.

No. 22698

Once again Taylor fakes cutting her hair. She's been wanting to cut it for a couple years but won't because her sugardaddy only likes long hair.

No. 22699

>>22698
6:55 "I don't care what people think, I wear what I want to wear"
Then go ahead and cut your fucking hair taylor

No. 22700

boyfriend is 40 years old, found an interview from 2010 and he was making $600k HKD (~$76k USD) income a month back then… who knows how much now… if anything Tay is

Chinese name is 聶x134子〇y明 (added gibberish in the middle to hopefully reduce the odds this will come up in a google search– I don't wanna ruin this guys rep or anything, just enjoy a bit of delicious youtuber gossip)

Weird she said he was Korean before, dude's 100% HKer, went to HKUST even.

No. 22701

It amazes me how she's still using his bf for money even for her supposed to be sweet "proposal" in her latest video. Like seriously, all these years, living off your 40 years old money is not enough and you need to use him for views (Since she knows when she post anything about Elbow-San, the views will be high compared to her other boring videos) and getting money from it on Youtube for this special occasion..wow Taylor, you must be a true definition of a first class gold digger. I adore you! From now on, you're my idol. LOL

No. 22702

A little bit of backstory, and she confirmed publicly that his name is Tom and they've been together since 2013

No. 22703

LOL as expected. Still using the sugardaddy for the money. She should give credit to the "fiance" for filming it (so she can use it for her youtube income) and also she needs to give him credits for A LOT of things in her life. He basically gave her everything. Career, house, her luxury travels..basically her whole life. You go girl!

No. 22704

>>22703
Lol why are you so salty… Youtube is her job, she vlogs every boring thing in her life, she was obviously going to show her engagement. And her fiance was the one who filmed the proposal, not her. People throw around sugar daddy all the time, her relationship is not like Yumi Kings

No. 22705

Hahahahaha that comment “true definition of a first class gold digger” I can’t. So funny

No. 22706

Why are you people blaming her for being a gold digger. It’s a good thing. We need to find Moneybag-san for ourselves too. Taylor, can you find us a sugar daddy too and what are the tips to get one since you’re great at it. Thanks.

No. 22707

>>22704

tbh the difference between Taylor R and Yumi King would make for a fascinating comparative case study for a sociologist focusing on AsianXwhite interracial relationships

No. 22708

>>22707

socioeconomic status. use of language. racialized standards of beauty. could go on and on

No. 22709

Not sure and don’t really care about the sugar daddy thing,but he is definitely ugly as hell.Stop trying to take cute pictures, you are FUCKING 40 YEARS OLD!

No. 22710

Taylor R = Katharine McPhee.
LOL

No. 22711

>>22709
he is older than 40 actually. definitely mid-40s if not older. I remember seeing his birth year somewhere and was a bit surprised.

I'm sure her family is a bit surprised by this pairing, but he made her career, so I guess they can't complain.

No. 22712

>>22702
also kek at that childish note she wrote him
how many times did she write soulmate in that 3rd-grade cursive? She almost misspelled it once too. Imagine their early relationship.

No. 22713

the fucking proposal video looked like something a 3rd grader would do on a windows movie maker back in 2009, wtf taytay.

No. 22714

That Jackie Chan lookalike must be into girls that looks like a 3rd grader with 3rd grade cursive handwriting . Creeeeepy

No. 22715

I remember the first time she talked about her boyfriend in her channel. At the time I thought she was dating a hot dude. She was really proud of her boyfriend somehow. Looks like I was wrong

No. 22716

>>22714
he looks nothing like jackie chan.

No. 22717

>>22716
Yes, but worst.

No. 22718

>>22717
just don't know what kind of person you are to call any random chinese guy jackie chan. It's probably something you shouldn't do in real life.

No. 22719

File: 1532951309342.png (796.16 KB, 944x611, Untitled.png)


No. 22720

>>22719

Eh, maybe she's getting work done again. Last time she became secretive and wore a mask she got cheek fillers. She always did express wanting larger boobs, so maybe its her pre-wedding gift.

No. 22721

>>22720
But she's saying she has a health problem anon. If it was a breast job she could hide it in other ways.

No. 22722

File: 1533005724756.jpeg (809.12 KB, 1242x1095, B769050B-D209-4129-ADF1-E1E44B…)

Elbow san aint too shabby looking though compared to what she could have gone for. Its not like he’s some grey old grandpa.

No. 22723

File: 1533037042278.png (70.04 KB, 591x591, Untitled.png)


No. 22724

>>22723

gotta milk it for money of course ! with a click bait title for them views. " I almost died and went to the hospital : gallbladder stones/ removal" …. Why are weebs so dramatic and extra about everything ?

No. 22725

Why don't you wait to hear what it is, before declaring it click-bait. Besides, I would imagine that after having emergency surgery she probably doesn't have the energy the write a long mult-tweet screed to detail her exact medical conditions.

No. 22726

>>22725
It takes two seconds to say what the problem is, but by doing so it ends all the traffic and sympathy that youtubers get from speculation alone.

If it was truly serious, you wouldn't see so many gleefully vague updates.

No. 22727

>>22726
She made 1 update since surgery anon, chill. No one said it was serious but surgery of any kind knocks you out and makes you feel like shit.

No. 22728

>>22724
My money is on appendix removal. Wonder how much clickbait videos she’ll be able to stretch this into.

No. 22729

>>22727
>surgery of any kind knocks you out and makes you feel like shit

OT but this is not even close to reality.

Not all surgeries require patients to be knocked out, and not all anesthesia will make patients feel like shit.

No. 22730

>>22724
She don’t care. All she want is views, likes and money. Lol

No. 22731

>>22725

She updated IG saying she has what looks like three stab marks on her tummy and feels "bad ass".

I'm sorry, but she probably saw the huge view count Venus got from talking about surgery and health problems she just wants a piece of them views . Sounds exactly like gallbladder stones, its more likely than appendix removal. My sister had the same and described the same problems with the same scars.



I mean we are talking about Taylor, the girl who cried on camera 13 years later about being chubby/skinny fat in grade school for sympathy. The girl who cries on camera because of a few pimples. She cries wolf for everything for them views and sympathy.

No. 22732

File: 1533562837671.png (351.23 KB, 713x877, Screenshot 2018-08-06 15.39.05…)

priorities

No. 22733

“I started this year saying I wanted a ripped 6 pack, i always sought after the “perfect stomach” and now I’m lying here with 3 permanent scars on it & I can’t exercise for 3 months”

Get over it taylor. Other people are dying but never complains, still trying hard to live their life to the fullest. They don’t just sit there, complaining like a baby on twitter and instagram like you.

No. 22734

>>22733
she probably has three tiny laparoscopy wounds. Mine were nearly impossible to see after 6 months.

No. 22735

>>22732


LOL, she's never had any muscle tone to begin with, and has always had an ugly boxy waist line.

No. 22736

>>22735
I dislike Taylor a lot, but I think she had some muscle tone. I tried her (ripped-off from some ballet fitness youtuber) workouts from 2015-2016. They require a certain amount of muscle strength. I'm sure she filmed those in segments so she could stop & rest & look kawaii, but she had the strength to do them.

I do not think you can lose all your muscle and "butt" (if she really built muscle over months) in a week or two. That's ridiculous.

If you think her waistline is ugly, I wonder what you think of practically every other person on earth. She's got a straighter body type, that's all. You won't see this shape )( because her hips are fairly narrow. There's not much she can do about that.

Her disordered perception of her body and food - and her marketing of this perception as normal - is what makes my blood boil. She's fake & is obsessed with going viral. But her body is fine, or it would be, if she stopped trying to make it into something it isn't. (That includes her restriction diet and the butt obsession.)

But again, she's an incredibly pampered woman who doesn't have to worry about paying bills or having a roof over her head. It's very deceptive that she tries to come across as normal while having almost no job. And if Youtube is her job, then where are her videos?

No. 22737

>>22728
In HK and Japan they tend to stay in the hospital for longer than in N America, it's just part of their protocols. That being said I had appendicitis in N America a couple months ago and the whole thing was over within three days. Surgery and was ready to walk again. Milking something as average as appendix removal for longer than a week, while it seems like something she would do, doesn't seem like that's the issue. And they don't do exploratory surgery like that.
My bet is that she has fibroids or endometriosis because she's always had problems with her period and now that she's ready to have kids you have to get that shit sorted out.

No. 22738

>>22737

She needs to work on her mental health and body image issues before having kids seeing as a couple of pounds and 3 little scars have set her in a spiral. I can't imagine what she's going to do when she is pregnant and can't even see her toes.

tbh I think she's just being a giant piss baby and it probably was something simple that she's now milking it. Were talking about the girl who cried 13 years after the fact about being a little chubby in grade school. She literally click baits and milks every little thing, and whines constantly about having 3-4 pimples on her jaw and about how rough her life is.

No. 22739

>>22738
her going on about being chubby in grade school drives me nuts. she wasn't even chubby and "took" care of it by the time she was 14. no one really makes fun of chubby girls until they're well into their teens anyways. her sister looks fucking great while pregnant/post partum, hope she can take a hint from that.

No. 22740

>>22739
She was really young - in elementary and middle school (not even a teen). It's shameful that she went on a diet at that age.

Imagine if she hadn't, and she had just waited to grow out of this phase like a normal kid. It's very possible she stunted her own growth by dieting in puberty. She could have grown taller and been a ~vouge model~ like she always wanted.

I still laugh at that misspelling of Vogue after some farmer pointed it out in her draw my life video.

No. 22741

File: 1534246412123.png (253.54 KB, 916x697, Screenshot 2018-08-14 13.32.10…)


No. 22742

>>22740

I'm doubtful she even dieted at that age as she always has the tendency to make herself sound like a hard worker. It was probably one of those over summer things, or gradually over a year type of thing. Taylor's a lazy shit that makes everything sound hard and rough.

Her whole I was fat once video was really deceitful too, notice how she only used pictures of her looking unhappy to give the impression she had a miserable childhood. Yet when she bought pictures up in her best friend's wedding video it was FULL of really happy pictures of her living her life and being a silly happy child.

I have never seen someone so desperate to seem average and coming from a rough/hard working life. Every other gal is desperately trying to seem luxurious and rich. (Tooter's and every intathot )

No. 22743

>>22742
>I'm doubtful she even dieted at that age

given that her family are all "perfect rich blondes" wouldn't surprise me if her mom gave her a hint towards "healthy options"

No. 22744

File: 1534338588670.png (1.04 MB, 1490x973, Screenshot 2018-08-15 15.06.28…)

>>22742
Her fat video is like the height of fakeness. If you rewatch it, you'll discover new gems. At the end, she has a single tear (or maybe some contact lens solution) running down her face as she reminds her followers, "And remember, I'll always be here."

I know Taylor is not (really) a true cow most of the time, but there's something really pathetic about her thirst for fame and attention.

No. 22745

>>22744

The thing that ticked me off the most with her wasn't even her fakeness. Its her fucking pity parties she throws for herself. Girl is always playing that tiny violin, like everything in her life is tragic and was a big ordeal to overcome. Like when she talked about speaking with Venus and made reference that she's been thru so many similar experiences as V. She really wants to be seen as this victim that came out strong, when in actuality she's this lazy spoiled turd that got even more pretentious and spoiled.

And kek, that image/screen shot is when she had hardcore cheek fillers, and had to film at specific angles and lighting. She was just as stiff as Kota was.

No. 22746

kind of messed up for her to milk this as much as she did tbh

No. 22747

>>22746
I'm probably late to say this but she probably noticed how much attention Venus' hospitalization got and decided to bandwagon.

No. 22748

I seriously think it’s time for her to stop making videos at all. All she did was click bait videos and video with rubbish contents. I used to love her vlogs but these days she looks like she’s trying so hard. It’s so annoying to look at her to the point that even her crappy ponytail with weird hair on the face annoys me. Sorry Taylor, it’s time. Goodbye.

No. 22749

Her stare-at-the-camera-with-big-eyes, creepy smile, horse ponytail and to be honest, disgusting looking bangs…..

I thought I’m the only one who hates looking at it.

No. 22750

>>22746

Can someone TLDR this please?

No. 22751

>>22750
She started to have a lot of pain in her lower stomach/pelvic region and was afraid she had appendicitis. She had an ovarian cyst and one of her ovaries twisted itself because of it. She was scared she would possibly have a huge Caesarian section style scar but they only needed to make 3 little incisions and everything was fine. She was triggered by the swelling because she couldn’t fit any of her clothes and had to wear pjs.

No. 22752

File: 1535500962948.png (997.41 KB, 1385x650, naamloos.png)

Small conspiracy theory but I think she's getting married this week.

In her "What Happened" video she mentioned that she felt SUPER IN LOVE DESU with Elbow-san because he sat in her hospital room all day, and that she wanted to elope and have his babies right away. She showed a text from her mother telling her to do it, and now she's in Canada according to her most recent video. She recently got her nails painted in a white colour and casually mentioned she's "never had white nails before". She also said in her most recent video she wants to get pregnant soon to prevent herself getting more ovarian cysts.

I think she's going to speedrun the whole wedding/early marriage/pregnancy part due to her nEaR DeAtH ExPeRiEnCe with ovarian cysts and she's going to get married while she's in Canada.

No. 22753

Is it just me or she sound sooooooooo thirsty in her hospital and newest video. Chill woman. We get it that you just got engaged. No one is taking Moneybag-san away from you. No need to be so desperate and thirsty all the time.

Maybe she’s toooo happy that finally she’s gonna have Moneybag-san’s money to fund her forever (well IF they’re together forever )

No. 22754

She always say that she’s working on something, creating videos, planning this and that….but wait. Where is the videos then? What videos? What project? All she did was following his “fiance” to meetings in other countries to eat and shop. No wonder people call her a goldigger and he is her sugar daddy. Cause i’m sure he paid for everything, she just have to look like she’s working hard on something when she doesn’t even do anything. All she did was complaining. You should stop complaining when everything was given to you and you did nothing at all.

No. 22755

>>22752

How many friends does Taylor actually have? How big is her extended family?

On the other hand, I'm having a hard time imagining Tom being okay with that. Ethnic Chinese families tend to be huge and Asian weddings tend to have hundreds of guests, especially for a prominent businessman he would be expected to attend his associates' weddings and then invite them to his.

Maybe they'll do a small Western style service in Canada followed by a wedding banquet in Hong Kong? I've seen that pattern for lots of friends in cross-cultural marriages. Even Jay Chou did something similar i think

No. 22756

>>22754
>>22753

Lol these posts unwitting come across as salty or jealous.

There are men that like spoiling their gf/wife. Especially in Chinese cultures, it's a point of pride that you make enough money that your wife doesn't have to work. Being able to have a beautiful white wife, who is much younger, and respectful and interested in the culture, that doesn't have to work a "real job" is like living the dream of success for some Asian men.

Here's a video about wealthy Hong Kong housewives :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8Qq3cFNUUI

No. 22757

>>22756
You mean marrying a lazy ass and a spoiled brat white woman?

Maybe that’s why they marry them (a beautiful white woman,much younger, and doesn’t have to work), because i think many Asian women wants to be independent and work hard on their own instead of just looking pretty, lazy and being spoiled easily like them. LOL

No. 22758

>>22757

>i think many Asian women wants to be independent and work hard on their own instead of just looking pretty, lazy and being spoiled


…You don't know many Asian women do you

No. 22759

>>22757
>spoiled brat
It's funny how many times this assertion gets thrown around with out any proof. Taylor may be spoiled by Tom but she's never been a brat.
You've never lived in Asia have you anon?
Looking pretty and not having to work is still considered the ideal in a lot of east asian countries.

No. 22760

>>22759
I started watching her videos since last year, i only love her vlogs when she’s back in Canada. Because she is always happy and putting an effort into her vlogs. But i must say, i agree with the anon, she’s probably used to be given a lot of things by her rich family or rich fiancé that she doesn’t feel the need to work hard on anything she do like other youtubers. You can see from her videos that she’s just doing it without any effort and most of her videos are boring and contentless, or clickbait videos. Such a let down. Sometimes she only complaints in her videos too, which kinda sucks to watch..it makes me don’t want to click to watch it anymore. But it is understandable when you don’t have to worry either you’re getting income from the videos or not,since she have rich family and fiancé who can just support her financially. I’m saying this as a viewer about her as a youtuber not as a person. Who knows, maybe she is a hard working person outside of Youtube. Maybe. Who knows.

No. 22761

>>22756
Taylor isn't very young though, so she will probably have kids soon. That video is very sad, wouldn't be surprised if Taylor's husband cheats on her eventually as well.

No. 22762

>>22761
>30
>old
anon are you 12?

No. 22763

>>22760
All her videos are not worth watching anymore. It's either clickbait videos, her being boring or videos of her showing off his fiance's money. Not worth watching at all.

No. 22764

File: 1537023908167.png (5.46 MB, 2208x1242, 0498DD23-84A2-4EE4-840A-0D3C62…)

This time it wasn’t clickbait. She got an uneven haircut, patchy color with no dimension. Apparently she wants to go even shorter. Brace yourselves for future videos where she complains and regrets it all.

No. 22765

>>22764
She really doesn't suit this look at all, yeesh.

No. 22766

>>22764
Two videos about a Mimei looking haircut and dye job, really?

No. 22767

>>22766
Lol maybe she is desperate. The sugardaddy doesn’t like the new hair so might have cut down her allowance. Need to earn more money from youtube from now on lol

No. 22768

>>22767
Indeed. He said he likes long hair better on her last video. Not a smart move cause now sugardaddy is not pleased.

No. 22769

>>22768
He liked the dolly look too, which says a lot about him.

Her current hair isn't the kind of hair you'd get when you're about to have a wedding or have kids, so I expect it'll be a while for either.

No. 22770

File: 1537419493852.png (5.82 MB, 2208x1242, E4C5BCDF-BE9B-473A-BCD0-C7EFC5…)

>>22769
I wonder what he thinks of this homeless style

No. 22771

>>22770

she really does not have the face for this hairstyle. at least with normal hair she looked normal pretty, this edgier look just makes it clear how plain her face is.

No. 22772

>>22768
Is it just me or can you guys see how desperate and how she tried so hard to look cute and loving whenever she’s with him in her latest video. I mean, with her age, it’s uncomfortable to even look at her try-hard to-look-cute attitude. Major cringy!

No. 22773

I just hate how she always make fun of the duck tape on the window that Hong Kong people always do in her new video. If you don’t believe in it, you don’t have to make fun of it. So disrespectful of other peoples’ beliefs. Shame on you.

No. 22774

>>22773
actually that's a common gag in HK now, she probably copied it like everything that goes viral - some HK people were buying every masking tape and then reselling it at a higher price. Some HK people started mocking these tape resellers and putting tape on their phones or watches, claiming to protect what's important to them.
What made me annoyed - aside of her behavior - was her talking about the shelter that she didn't bother to visit for last few months, and when they needed the help after typhoon she didn't even go there to help them out. I know her fans will donate some money, and that's great, but she has all the time and money and the world to actually help them out, yet she prefers to sit at home, watch netflix or youtube and ask others for help. PR stunt, that's all it was.

No. 22775

>>22774
So many people are doing volunteer cleanups and helping their communities out, but she doesn't even bother to integrate into the country. She's too busy saying she's 'stressed' over superficial problems that aren't even hers.

So I'm not surprised she doesn't help anyone out. This attitude is why she wouldn't have close friends beyond her own family.

No. 22776

>>22773
Apparently for pulltards she was absolutely respectful but I thought she wasn’t. I got kinda of upset too but she lives in her own little bubble so what does she care. She made herself look like an idiot at the beginning when she had no idea what the tape is for.

No. 22777

>>22776

There have been so many times in her videos that I've been astounded at how dumb/sheltered she is, and she doesn't even seem to realise it because she doesn't edit it out of the video. For someone that's done so much travelling and lived in various countries, you would think she'd pick up an open mind or an interest in other cultures, but she really is as thick as a plank of wood.

No. 22778

>>22777
I sometimes wonder if she was less pretty would she actually be more intelligent and less ignorant? Literally the moment she hooked up with Tom she gave up her studies in Hong Kong, but then when I come to think about it I think she only did it for visa… I don’t wish her bad but does she even have a plan if he leaves her? Obviously the flat they are getting will be only under his name as 1. She won’t get the mortgage as she doesn’t have stable income 2. As a non-permanent resident she would need to pay additional tax - that would leave her with no place to live, no education, long gone modeling. Is being a YouTuber her contingency plan just in case?

No. 22779

>>22778

Her family has enough money that I don't think she's ever been worried about what would happen if everything failed. She knows she could just go home and start again with support from both her parents.

And also, I don't think her looks caused her ignorance. There are good looking people who are smart. And it's not just that she isn't 'book smart' (like good at maths or passing tests or whatever), it's more that she doesn't seem to have any kind of appreciation or curiosity for new things. She's very one dimensional.

No. 22780

>>22776
>she was absolutely respectful

I thought it was messy asking her fans, most of which are poorfag teens, to donate to a pet shelter in HongKong while she literally does the least.

No. 22781

>>22779
but if you noticed how her sibling lives, they do not seem to get that much financial support form the family. I know they are wealthy and she definitely wouldn't be starving, but I don't think they would be thrilled to help a 30yo ex model youtuber at all the time. And let's face it - if she moved to Canada she most likely would lose plenty of subscribers as her content is very boring, all she has to show now is her wealthy. She wouldn't even be able to do all these stupid DIYs as she probably wouldn't have spare money to spend on art supplies.

On a side note - I wonder how Elbow explains to his business partners the weird videos his fiance shoots. I know he's doing beauty exchange and that's not really an industry that requires strict behavior, but in general, does she even consider how it affect his image as a businessman? I used to like her videos, more or less, but now she behaves like a 12 yo it's just so annoying.

No. 22782

File: 1537537328751.jpeg (1.83 MB, 1242x1855, 7FA01557-01AC-4CBD-A434-04C9E9…)

She’s always creepy af when it comes to her “assistant” “I hope to keep laughing with you forever” it’s just too cringy.

>>22778
>>22781

This is true however doesn’t even care to keep her sugardaddy and main source of income happy which is not smart at all.

No. 22783

>>22782
what on earth is she wearing? plus those hideous LV sneakers … well, money won't buy you good taste

No. 22784

>>22775
>>22774

… How do you know she didn't do anything? If she donated and told people about it, everyone would be moaning about her showing off, so she's damned if she does and if she doesn't. The roads were cut off by trees, how could she even made it there? This thread has gotten so salty and nitpicky and whiny it makes me miss Kiki.

No. 22785

>>22784
somehow other volunteers got there to help - I guess they have a flying carpet or something. asking for money is the easiest way to get some good PR without doing much which she mastered. perfect image without doing much. I'm not salty about her staying nice and cozy at home and not helping out, but by the fact she uses these animals as a PR stunt.

cool she donated money (if she did, not just asked others), but so are other people. even the lady who runs the place crosses the boarder every day while princess taylor is being lazy at home and giving out to people how you need to work hard to achieve your dreams (which makes me laugh every time she says this)

No. 22786

>>22784
Yeah stop excusing her and go back to pull.

No. 22787

File: 1537625177180.jpeg (1.04 MB, 2048x1972, 9E9502AF-F340-4E7D-9B8A-713E2D…)

Hanging out with her poor friend lol

No. 22788

>>22787

sage for tinfoil but both the outfits she's wearing in Sharla's instagram story have baggy tops. That grey sweatshirt pictured and then a green tracksuit.

Wonder if she's hiding something under there?

No. 22789

>>22788
I doubt it, she has been liking baggy tops for some time. She had the surgery tho, so she might feel more comfortable wearing things that don't touch the scars if the scars feel weird still or something?

No. 22790

>>22784
>… How do you know she didn't do anything?

And how do you know that she did? She already overshares that she does nothing all day.

>>22787
These pics look too staged to seem natural at a glance.

No. 22791

>>22774
>>22775

To be fair she doesn't speak the language and doesn't have practical skills that would be helpful in a disaster. We don't know how much of their income they are contributing to relief efforts.

Also as someone who lived in the region before: typhoons happen every year. Yes, this one was a particularly bad one, but there were no deaths in Hong Kong, so it's a lower scale tragedy than you might think.

In a disaster scenario, the worst thing is when well-meaning foreigners barge in and try to "volunteer". Between their basic needs, translators, training them in the necessary disaster relief skills, they end up doing more harm than good. Cash is the best thing people can do

No. 22792

>>22778

A flat can be in both people's names even if only one person gets the mortgage/pays the mortgage.
Also, aren't they buying a flat in Toronto too?

No. 22793

>>22790
>And how do you know that she did?

I don't, and neither does the other anon, so hating on her for possibly not doing anything is fucking stupid and makes the anon seem like a salty teenager.

>she did x in her video so obviously she is y! reeeeeeeeeeee!


Come on now

No. 22794

>>22792
it can be but then they would need to pay extra tax just because she is a foreigner - I don't think he would be OK to throw money away like that

No. 22795

>>22793
for someone who shares their reaction to IG post on a toilet in her video, I'm pretty sure she would share if she did anything. she's just lazy and you can't admit that.

No. 22796

>>22784
>>22793
Taylor stans are wild af taking things personal.

No. 22797

>>22793
Did you notice where you are?

>>22796
Aka pulltards

No. 22798

>>22797
Sorry, I thought I was on lolcow where nitpicking and tinfoiling is usually discouraged, not Salt Sperg City.

>no hate boner reaching for the stars - must be a stan


>>22795
You act as if she shares things on Momokuns level, when she barely posts on instagram and makes one video a week at most. She's not smart, do you really think she could have done anything at the sanctuary? To me it's obvious that she donated too, so I really don't see a reason she should state that "yeah, btw, I donated". She also said that you don't have to donate and it's enough if you would just share the news, so it's not like her fans will feel that they absolutely have to give their pocket money. True, she is lazy, and donating is a lazy persons way to feel accomplished, so I really don't see a problem with this.

No. 22799

>>22798
>To me it's obvious that she donated too

Not that anon, but you're stanning and projecting big time.

No. 22800

>>22799
She's rich and lazy and knows the people who run the shelter, so I think it's more plausible she did than that she didn't. Not mentioning your donation or the amount is pretty standard because mentioning it seems braggy. We will not know whether she did or didn't donate, so anons crying about what an awful bitch she is for not donating are cringy speculators. Why is everybody so offended by me saying that there is a possibility she did donate? Everyone does something nice every once in a while even if they are total bitches, so it's not that far fetched.

No. 22801

>>22794

My guess then would be that the Hong Kong flat is in his name and the Toronto flat will be in her name or both of their names

No. 22802

>>22781

>On a side note - I wonder how Elbow explains to his business partners the weird videos his fiance shoots.


I feel like her videos are totally acceptable? The older ones where she is weeaboo cringy are kinda cringe, but if you go to her channel now it's her being cute and eating Hong Kong food and talking about dogs.
I think she makes a pretty good accessory for him since she's super pretty and obviously into the culture.
Would like to see her learning more Cantonese though.

No. 22803

I don’t talk about vlogs or travel videos, more like those cringy nose hair extensions

No. 22804

>>22798
It’s not about donating or not, it’s about her making two videos to get good PR (lady who helps the shelter provides her with her dog food: look up furry kitchen), then she didn’t even bother to go a single time in meantime. She will mention it once every three months if sth happens, but won’t move her lazy ass to actually make a change like she said she will - she has all the time and money to do so, yet she’s fake like always and using animals as PR stunt is disgusting to me. She did some good, but it’s not that no one knew that place before - they were pretty known in HK already, without her input.
You can disagree with me but you won’t change my mind about her actions

No. 22805

>>22802
Lol i doubt that he is okay with it. That’s why he never appear in her videos on Youtube or pictures on Instagram much. You can totally see and tell that he is not interested about her videos from her latest video. He doesn’t even want to be in it. Well I can’t blame him. It’s just going to affect his image as a successful businessman.

That’s the point of having a beautiful wife when that’s the only thing you can show off about her. Obviously that’s the only thing he can show off, since smart, hardworking or a successful youtuber is not on the list.

No. 22806

>>22805
I believe he doesn't appear on her stuff too much since East Asians are often very private and shy about that stuff? He seems to be fine with her content and they seem to have a similar sense of humor too. If he only liked her for her dolly look he could easily drop her, since Japan and Korea are full of blond, cute girls. I don't think Taylor is a total bimbo, she just seems a little awkward and silly, and most of her videos are just fine. If they really have a sugar relationship and he isn't okay with the videos, he can just tell her not to do them, but I'm not really buying the sugar daddy theory that much since they seem to really like each other.

No. 22807

>>22806

this. I've been in a similar relationship and while yes the looks-money exchange is real, the people often also develop feelings for each other. For all we know Elbow also goes to see prostitutes or has other women on the side but the fact that he's proposed to Taylor and allows her to be public about the relationship pretty much indicates he does care about her. Nobody puts a ring on a sugar baby lol

No. 22808

It's not really a "looks-money exchange". Most men are embarrassed of being seen that way. But they just happen to shower affection (including in a material sense) on a woman who is young and pretty. And the woman adores him in response.

It's like the never-ending argument of whether cats really love their owners or if they just view the owners as a source of cat food tins.

No. 22809

>>22804
Don’t go too hard saying the truth about her, taylovers may have a seizure.
>>22807
>For all we know Elbow also goes to see prostitutes or has other women on the side
Lmao what? How do you know this? Just curious

No. 22810

>>22809

just describing some typical situations in which Chinese guys have sexual relations with many women but still have a wife (正妻)
seems tay is the 正妻 in this scenario

No. 22811

>>22802
I think she deleted most of her old weeaboo vids now.

>>22804
She has so little going on that she literally got a haircut she doesn't like (nor does anyone seem to like) and buys things to have content. Donating, such as even showing a walkthrough of how to donate as she does it, and helping out is content she would have used without hesitation.

No. 22812

File: 1538137285095.png (1.2 MB, 640x1136, 44025094-0588-49CC-91DE-2E48C3…)

Damn!
This is now Taylor should be styling herself.

No. 22813

File: 1538330127977.jpeg (401.18 KB, 1242x1727, 269456E3-B5D6-4096-9707-339345…)

While her fiancé works hard this is what she does for a living lol

No. 22814

>>22813
I always giggle seeing people WK her and saying she has money because ‘she works hard’ - nah, think again
I agree YT can be a job for someone, but to her it’s just a hobby - have it or not, won’t make a difference. She just wants to get viral - AGAIN.

She’s pretty and thanks to Tom she doesn’t need to worry about anything when it comes to finance - is her only ambition is to be YouTube famous? She could do anything with her life yet she chooses to do half ass videos every now and then for YouTube

No. 22815

>>22812
Close but not quite with those eyebrows.

No. 22816

>>22814
Her videos are rubbish. It’s fun to watch how she use her stupidity to be famous. Well it worked, she did look stupid in all her videos.

No. 22817

>>22809
No wonder she follows him around like crazy, she looks like she has no own life. Always following him to business trips. Probably she’s afraid that the sugar daddy will find another baby daddy while he is away. But it’s embarrassing to watch how she never work on her own in her life and always depends on the guy on everything . What a shame to live like that.

No. 22818

>>22814

Who said she works hard? She's obviously aiming for the housewife role. I imagine after the marriage she will have kids and focus on that.

>>22817
They're engaged, I'm pretty sure that means she's been upgraded from sugar baby to trophy wife

No. 22819

>>22818
She had many videos where she says she works hard but never shows it. She stopped talking about working hard to acheive dreams~ after people revealed the sugar daddy.

When she has kids, she'll pay other people to raise them while she works harder on maintaining a youthful look and gets rid of her pet. Expecting her to end up similar to Xiaxue in terms of content, but less original.

No. 22820

>>22819
Of course she have to maintain herself after she have kids, because if she don’t, do you think the baby daddy will still like her if she’s no longer pretty? I don’t think so. Because other than looking pretty, she got nothing else that she can be proud of. If baby daddy is gone, she’done.

No. 22821

File: 1538492790612.png (4.21 MB, 1242x2208, 8CC100C9-A54C-48BC-B67D-C31326…)

Are they in love tho? More like conveniently together

No. 22822

>>22821
I know that anons want desperately for some reason for their relationship to just be a sugar thing, but judging by what we know now, it just doesn't seem like it to me.
After all if that's all Tom wanted he could easily land a girl that's prettier and more normal than Tay. For better or for worse I think they love each other.

No. 22823

>>22822
I think they love each other now, but it started as sugar daddy thing. I mean, if he owned a noodle store or be a regular salary man who cannot help her in career in HK to stand against so many other white models - would she even bothered to go out with semi attractive older dude? Doubt it.

No. 22824

>>22822
No one is desperately looking for a reason. Because it is the truth, everyone can see this is a sugar thing. What annoys me is that how she always try to show that this isn’t and say that she works hard for everything she earned in her life. Like seriously? Bullshit. Even the most successful girl on YouTube (Zoella), you can see how she work so hard in her daily life and put an effort in every videos she uploaded to live luxurious like she is living now. But her? Did she even work hard or put an effort in her videos besides just looking pretty, complains on videos, do stupid things on videos and follow her fiancé around like a crazy jealous wife. She is a lazy ass and spoiled giant baby.

With that face and age (no offense Tom) do you think she will like him if he is not a rich businessman? I bet she will already make a video about an pervert old man that creeps her out (about him) if he is not that rich lol

But it’s a win-win situation for them, he might like a bimbo that is also an easy girl like her who he can show to his friends and be proud of (this is very common in Asia), and she needs a guy who can support her financially and spoiled her with luxury things when she doesn’t have to work to earn money.

No. 22825

>>22824
OMG!! YES I AGREE!!!
Thank you anon!!! Finally someone said it.
Even a millionaire like Zoe work 100 times harder in her life and put effort to every of her videos than Taylor lol if she work just half the effort and be hardworking just like her, no one will be able to say anything about how she just depends on her fiancé money to support her financially….

“Lazy ass and spoiled giant baby”
Omg so mean but so true at the same time…LOL

No. 22826

>>22824
What do you expect with Taylor stans…
it is obvious Tom is her sugar daddy for the reasons you have already said. That’s why when I saw the wedding card that says “brilliantly in love”, besides being cringey af it sounds very off.

No. 22827

Not even her wedding is going to be original. She says she wants a dress like some Italian woman and bridesmaid dresses like Kate Moss wedding. Wouldn’t it be nice to have an original wedding instead of copying from other people?

No. 22828

>>22826
Not agreeing with salty weebs =/= stanning, anon. I don't remember ever seeing a thread with so much reaching and saltiness about someone so uncontroversial, drama free and bland. I really don't get how she can raise such an anger out of some anons. I wish there were two threads for her - one for salty, jealous weebs to circlejerk in, and one for actual discussion without crazy fanfiction by underaged people. Not that she's in any way milky, but she does some annoying and cringy things sometimes that would be fun to talk about.

No. 22829

>>22828
Agreed anon. Taylor's an airhead who's often cringy af, but the shitty ESL fanfic that some anons come up with is just goofy.

>>22826
>it is obvious Tom is her sugar daddy for the reasons you have already said
What reasons? That anon didn't give any reasons. They just went into a weird invective about "work hard" and Zoella.

I don't think she's a sugar-baby because she doesn't live the life. All of the girls that I know that sugared would not be content with Taylor's lifestyle. These girls had expensive apts in NYC paid for them -that they lived in alone. They were given Hermes Birkin bags. They had a 5-10k monthly allowance that they spent freely. They shopped at Gucci/Chanel/Balmain on the regular. They traveled to St Tropez and Dubai. Not one of them married their sugar daddies.

No. 22830

>>22820

he will want to ensure his "genetically superior" (barf) halfie kids have a good upbringing.

I think the bigger question is whether or not Tay can be that mother. Canadians don't have the crazy stressful mothering style Chinese moms do.

No. 22831

I'm in a relationship with a man who is older (about a decade older) and much wealthier than myself, and he's not conventionally attractive.
Money is definitely a factor but I can also say I genuinely love him. Looks aren't everything. Think about it when you get old everyone looks bad but the personality remains.

No. 22832

>>22829
It’s not like the idea of her being his sugar baby is totally crazy. Besides not all sugar baby and daddy relationships are the same.

No. 22833

>>22832
It is if you have either sugared or know people who have (which you clearly haven't and don't).
Taylor and Tom have been together for 5 years and their relationship has had a fairly ordinary organic progression.
-internet friends
-irl friends
-dating not living together
-dating and living together
-engaged
I have never met a sugar baby whose sugar relationship had that trajectory.

No. 22834

>>22833
You forgot

-promoted her youtube career though partnerships and paid outreach
-connects her with agencies and gigs through his company to keep her busy and even pays for a manager to escort her around so she never has to learn foreign languages
-pays for her beauty upkeep on top of rent
-will throw a lot of cash at whatever she needs to follow viral trends

It might not be straight forward sugaring, but the relationship dynamic being advantageous to both is there like >>22824 said.

You don't have to be a weeb to think something is off about the two. Even a normalfag just looking at their pics would wonder why the couple is together with such a gap.

No. 22835

>>22834
And you're just making things up to suit your favored narrative.

>promoted her youtube career though partnerships and paid outreach

He promoted her through Beautyexchange which she blogged for. He has also promoted other beautyexchange bloggers. I think given their relationship, he probably shouldn't have done that but it's not really a red flag to me.
>connects her with agencies and gigs through his company to keep her busy and even pays for a manager to escort her around so she never has to learn foreign languages
What agencies? She's not signed at all now and when she was it was long before she even met Tom. Satoru was her Japanese agency from the beginning (from her earliest trips to Japan). While she was there, it was her booker at Satoru who escorted her and that made sense with what she was doing. Her being at BeautyExchange events is mutually beneficial because whether you like her or not she a relatively popular youtuber (especially for her market).
>pays for her beauty upkeep on top of rent
Rent for the home they live in together.
What beauty upkeep? Before this year she was only coloring her hair 2-3 times a year. She wears mostly middle tier makeup, and she doesn't go to the aesthetician for cool-sculpting or anything. And since I don't believe she had anything more invasive than fillers, that's not much of an expense either.
>will throw a lot of cash at whatever she needs to follow viral trends.
Most of her viral videos have been DIYs. A sugar-baby would have actually gotten real Vetements or Saint Laurent.

And that's the point I'm trying to make. I don't think what he does for her is beyond what a person of means would normally do for their partner who they support and love.

Newsflash: rich people have relationships. Attractive people have relationships. Sometimes they have them with each other. She would hardly be the first model to choose someone who wasn't conventionally attractive but treated her like she hung the moon. And judging by his actions, it would seem that he does. (Dude was out with her at ass-o'clock in the morning to film her flailing around to the Yokai Watch theme twice-if that's not devotion, I'm not sure what is)
>>22831
This anon summed it up nicely.

No. 22836

>>22833
Anon, human relationships are complex, they don’t always fit your mould or any other.
Only they know what kind of relationship they have and we can only speculate. I think they’re just used to each other now but they are just together out of convenience.

No. 22837

>>22833
Agreed. It's quite blatantly not a sugar baby thing. It's a normal/traditional format of a relationship. Note her family are also rich, and she will have her own money and savings from working. The only issue I have with their portrayed relationship is he is very short/aloof when speaking to her in English. I'd like to see them converse in Cantonese to see if that is more organic.

No. 22838

>>22837
I just wanted to say something similar!

I just cannot understand how they can hold a deeper conversation when he seems to have problems explaining simple things - I’m not sure if that’s just him being stressed out knowing whatever he says may be in a video and people would judge him or simply his English is OK for simple conversations but it’s just not good enough to have a dynamic normal talk.
He seems very slow when responding to her and his sentences are short and simple.

I’m not a native English speaker, neither is my husband, we do not speak each other languages so we have to speak English to each other and I don’t want it to sound like bragging but our spoken English is much better. I wouldn’t be able to be with someone I cannot communicate normally - doesn’t matter in what language, I just wouldn’t be able to stand the way Tom speaks.

As for Taylor learning Cantonese - forget about it. She couldn’t learn Japanese which is much easier (even for speaking only), she lived for 4 years before in HK and even with already being with Tom she didn’t bother to learn.
Like even in recent videos she asked him at the airport how you pronounce Toronto in Cantonese - she should know this by now.
She can get around HK with English only so she won’t have motivation to do so. She also has her ‘assistant’ to do translating for her. I don’t see that coming.

No. 22839

>>22838
Yes, same anon you replied to and I agree. If their only conversation together is in English, it seems sorely lacking based on the videos. However his understanding of English is very good, but he seems unconfident speaking it for sure.
Every ESL person I've ever met had better spoken English than what we've heard from Elbow-San. But they do seem very happy together so maybe he's just extremely shy on camera.

No. 22840

>>22838
>>22839

Yeah, as someone who has spent quite a bit of time in HK, Tom(or should I say 子明)'s English accent is shockingly bad for someone who is reasonably internationalized as he is. That said, it's also puzzling that he has relatives in France, rather than UK/Canada/USA. My best guess is that Taylor is being honest when she says he is a self made man, and that he genuinely was from a poor or middle class Honger family that was aspirational af and that's why they have the wealth and internationalism without the trappings of "old money" HK elites…

No. 22841

>>22839
I would assume that they speak a kind of Canglish. Like Tay probably understands more Cantonese than she speaks and vice versa for him.
>>22840
That makes sense.

No. 22842

I highly doubt she understands anything aside of which thank you to use and names of dim sum - at the end she asked him about how to pronounce Toronto in Cantonese despite being there for so long.
I think one of the main reasons to move to HK was that she doesn’t need to learn the language, she couldn’t get around Japan much as she wouldn’t actually learn the language aside of how to pronounce her dialogues in drama.

We talk about girl who thinks WWIII was a thing.

No. 22843

>>22842
Ah it's you.
That's not necessarily how it works. It's totally possible to suck at speaking a language and yet be able to understand it when you hear it. They aren't mutually exclusive; especially if you are -like Taylor- uncomfortable and self conscious about making mistakes. The reason that they moved to HK is because that's where Tom's primary business is and Taylor's modeling career is over. She even said that Japan was never intended to be permanent for them.
And it's honestly completely feasible to live in Japan with almost zero Japanese. Expats there do it for decades. I think that it's sad and a waste, but there you go.
>We talk about girl who thinks WWIII was a thing
Pretty sure that was just a stupid mistake. Taylor's an airhead, not a Mira-tier moron.

No. 22844

>>22843

-> Pretty sure that was just a stupid mistake. Taylor's an airhead, not a Mira-tier moron.

Mistake she should have edited, but she had no idea it's incorrect so she kept it.
She's not the brightest - not a complete moron, but learning was never her thing. She didn't even finish the degree she started in Hong Kong.

I don't say everyone should be 'book smart', but I often get stupid-girl vibes from her. I would like to believe she does that on purpose to be more 'relatable' to younger viewers, but you can clearly see there's a big gap between her and people her age when it comes to common knowledge.

No. 22845

About Tay learning Cantonese, I'm familiar with Hong Kong and my grandparents speak Canto so I'll try to give some sociolinguistic insight.

First of all, English is an official language of Hong Kong, and due to the colonial history, it's considered the most prestigious language. That's why I said well-to-do old money family kids would speak proper English. This is particularly true for someone around Elbow's age because HK was still a British territory when he was a schoolkid. The British colonizers, even if they lived in Hong Kong for years, wouldn't bother themselves with learning Cantonese as they saw it "beneath" them. There are a very few exceptions – for instance, missionaries tend to learn the language because it helps them reach more people, and I even met a white girl who was born and raised in HK and spoke Cantonese (as well as English) natively because her father was a missionary that preached in Cantonese. But that is the 1% of white people in Hong Kong, even now expats from rich Western countries like UK and Canada and from poorer countries like India and Philippines alike generally don't learn more than rudimentary Cantonese. Taylor is a wealthy woman who would mostly associate with people who can speak English and thus doesn't have much need to learn Cantonese.

On top of that, HK was handed over to China on 1997, and with that a lot of schools started focusing on teaching Mandarin Chinese (Beijing dialect) even over English. There are a TON of tensions because Hong Kong people don't really like mainland people and thus don't like Mandarin, but at the government level there is a big push for Mandarin.

In Canton (Guangdong) province in China where Cantonese originates, Cantonese was always both the most widely spoken language and also always viewed as inferior to Mandarin or as not a "proper" language again due to the reason that the main government spoke Mandarin.

A lot of immigrants from Hong Kong and Canton to Canada and the USA don't teach their children Cantonese because they view it as an "informal, less prestigious" language vis-a-vis English.

There are people pushing for standardization of Cantonese and taking pride in Cantonese, but these tend to be politically oriented people who don't like the Chinese government removing their freedoms and view themselves as separate from China. Elbow is a businessman who probably does a decent amount of business in China so I doubt he would make waves like that.

That said, I do think it would be good for Taylor to learn Cantonese. From Elbow's accent, we can obviously see Cantonese is his native language and the one he's most comfortable speaking. Taylor's videos usually have Chinese subtitles and I imagine either Elbow writes them himself or requests that they be added so other Chinese people can follow along with the videos. His websites are in Chinese and his fellow contacts are mostly Hong Kong people. Speaking Canto would definitely help bring Taylor closer to both Elbow and also to being integrated in Hong Kong society. I can imagine at many of the modeling and business events, everyone around her chattering away in Cantonese while she stands around awkwardly…

It's just an uphill battle for her to learn Cantonese. Everyone will tell her "Why learn Canto? English is better!". I bet even if she speaks a few words of Canto to people, they will see she's white and switch to English to accommodate her.
By the way, it's an incredibly challenging language to learn, with the traditional character set, the 8 tones, and the lack of good learning materials when contrasted with Mandarin.

No. 22846

>>22845
This was very interesting Anon, thanks for posting. It gives good insight. And I agree that it would benefit her to learn Cantonese, despite social pressure not to. Especially as she is heavily hinting at getting pregnant soon. Her children should learn both languages to ensure a good bond and understanding of their heritage.

No. 22847

File: 1540893239761.png (859.38 KB, 552x581, Capture.PNG)

I dislike her style change so much.
With such a figure she could rock more flattering clothes.

I know Tom loves her, but I wonder what he honestly thinks about the change. He said in one of her videos he fell for her as she was different from other 'white models in HK' (I don't remember which video exactly, tho)

No. 22848

>>22847
It seemed to have happened pretty gradually so he probably got used to it. I mean let's be real, if she tried to do that uber girly look in earnest nowadays it would be cringy af. That ship has sailed for her I think. Case in point: Kota's trying to do it for some photo shoot and the cringe is so strong I want to jump off a building to escape.
Anyway, I wish Tay had found more of a middle ground than just going full insta-style but c'est la vie.

No. 22849

>>22848
totally agree it would be creepy!
but she had that lovely phase in between when she dressed up so nicely - like the jeans skirt and boots, long long time ago.
now it seems she tries to pursue insta trends too much. I know things can be 'trendy', but have she and her WK heard about term 'fashion victim'? like those ugly furry gucci shoes - they were 'trendy' at some point, but no one aside of super rich people showing off wouldn't ware them - this is how I feel about her recent outfits

No. 22850

>>22849
Agreed. I also wish she had more originality. She honestly looks best in more feminine styles because her features are so soft and delicate. I'd love to see her in kind of an updated mod-style or I even think that she could probably pull off soft toned down larme. Maybe a vintage-y look. Honestly there are so many styles for her to pick and choose from.
But this trendy thing does her a disservice.

No. 22851

>>22849
Everyone seems to think her hair before looked a lot better, especially when the kawaii shit was tamed. When there were more friends like the jvloggers in her circle, she seemed to dress better.

Now she's a mix of kardashian, ill fitting hipster and fast fashion instathot. At her age and access to resources, she should have already developed a sense for what looks good.

No. 22852

Taylor and Elbow-san address questions posed by people on the internet about them and their relationship. Around the 15 minute mark they talk about the age difference and whether or not elbow-san considers himself a sugar daddy (he says hes not and talyor makes her own money and she agrees). Elbow-san of course does not want to show his face on camera as per usual

No. 22853

Unless she has another job we don't know about, Taylor doesn't make enough money to be able to buy all of those luxury goods even if she isn't contributing to rent, and her youtube and model work is so sporadic now that she has to make far less than the average Canadian her age. I have to wonder if the video was made because Tom is starting to get embarrassed about the age and economic gap now that they're getting married and people in his life who don't follow youtube will be meeting Taylor at the wedding for the first time and judging or laughing at him behind his back. Tom also looks older than 42, so their age difference looks bigger than 12 years if they are telling the truth.

No. 22854

>>22852
Ever since the dude was outed as her lifestyle provider, Taylor no longer pushes the "work hard for your dreams" lie as much.

>I'm quite mature

>I provide for myself
I've seen enough. I remember he lambasted her for running up phone bills and getting cards declined like a teen. She can't even buy her own business class tickets if she wanted.

No. 22855

>>22853
>all of those luxury goods
What luxury goods? She buys mostly fast fashion. The luxury items she has are gifts for the most part. You act like she's buying Saint Laurent and Gucci every week.
>she has to make far less than the average Canadian her age
Look at the end of the day, we don't know jack about her finances and what she does or doesn't have in the bank.
> I have to wonder if the video was made because Tom is starting to get embarrassed about the age and economic gap
I doubt it. Her followers have been bugging her to do it for ages. He didn't want to do it. He didn't seem embarrassed at all. And newsflash, Taylor isn't some kind of dirty secret for him. She already knows his friends and family. She's been to his friends weddings and baby showers. She's been to his work parties. She spends holidays with his family. They seem to be fully engaged in each other's lives.
>>22854
He was the one who called her mature first. Admittedly I raised my eyebrows at that, but I figure that he knows her better than I do. What we see in her youtube videos is only a tiny fraction of her whole. And one where she often doesn't present herself very well.

No. 22856

>>22855

She said "I support myself." Supporting yourself means paying for your own living expenses, including travel, rent, food, and phone.

Tom didn't show his face on the video. His immediately family and company employees have met her, but now she'll be meeting distant relatives, business contacts, former colleagues, classmates, people who don't follow their social media and don't know about her.

No. 22857

>>22855
>Look at the end of the day, we don't know jack about her finances and what she does or doesn't have in the bank.

Not the anon you're replying to, but the way everything money or adulting related is a mystery to her at 30 shows that she is being carried.

If she was living below her means and had credit history, she would have had an easy time getting approved for the condos. She and Tom wouldn't have had to reel in dad for help at the 11th hour and have meltdowns over an imagined entitlement.

No. 22858

>>22852

Sorry but the discussion towards the end of the video gave me a mental image of them having sex (even though she's trying to be coy about it) and i did not need that in my mind.

I'm picturing her slowly teaching him the correct english expressions for during sex and it's just cringe

No. 22859

Elbow san is chomping at the bit to get tay tay preggo probably because he’s fucking ancient (talk about having a baby doesn’t start until literally a minute or two before the video ends)

No. 22860

>>22859
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bp9pMnKhclU/
Who is running Elbow san’s IG? “Per” “epic” “breathless” just don’t seem like words you’d find in his vocabulary. It's also really weird that a super wealthy CEO started up a new IG for his fiancee's tween fans.

No. 22861

File: 1542088917668.png (130.49 KB, 459x231, tb.png)

>>22859
I find the way she chose to change the thumbnail and title interesting, wonder if she changed it to get more views or if Tom didn't like it?

No. 22862

>>22853
why do all her fans tell her how young Tom looks? He looks older. I wouldn´t be surprised if they fudged his age a bit, honestly

No. 22863

>>22855
Lots of assumptions here. She has some incredibly expensive stuff mixed into her fast fashion. She also seems to wear things once or twice, tops, except for a couple comfort outfits. (Based on when she used to vlog everyday.) This white knighting is obnoxious.

No. 22864

>>22860

Dude, his fiancee is a native English speaker from Canada, it's not at all surprising he would pick up on some basic white bitch slang lol

These recent videos…urgh. I honestly had a better image of their relationship when Elbow-san wasn't talking. He shouldn't have let Tay talk him into doing videos.

Also his shit English in a former British colony is more than enough proof that he grew up poor, yet the hags on PULL still think he comes from a rich family kek.

No. 22865

>>22862
it's funny how they try to suck it up to her by saying he looks so young - no, he doesn't. he looks his age, if I've seen him on the street I would say he's in his early 40s.
he seems all right, he works hard, but what's the point of saying 'I wouldn't guess his age' when he does look like a 40 yo guy?

No. 22866

>>22863
Girl just bought a painting that costs in the thousands. Then again, those same fans are already excited about her getting pregnant because it’ll give her content.

>>22864
I don’t think “breathless” is part of her vocab, either.

>>22865
He looks older than early 40s for a Chinese guy and he's soaking up the compliments and attention seeing how often he’s been updating. But what’s a smart, hardworking guy like Tom doing with Taylor? If he just wanted a young pretty thing, he could’ve easily gotten a more beautiful and successful model with his wealth and connections, unless something's off. He pursued Taylor on Facebook (don't give me that "they were just friends" crap), so it’s not like he was attracted to her personality. They were both in relationships with other people. Maybe we’ll finally find out.

No. 22867

>>22864
I visited HK many years ago after the Brit occupation just ended and there were many people with poor English. Being a self-made man is just as good as family money.

>>22866
They obviously spent a lot of time getting to know each other before they even met. Imo they’re pretty open about that. Is it so far fetched they like each other for personality first?

No. 22868

>>22854
In a video from January she has got a package in the mail and he teases her about it only being her third package…today which really implied that he was paying for it. She does make Youtube buxx but she also shops a little too often to be covered. He is definitely paying for some things.

I think he doesn't like the white hair as much as she looks more like a trophy wife/gf and makes it more obvious.

No. 22869

>>22861
The title is now "fiance Tag part 2 and Tom's Birthday"

Lead with clickbait and change it later scribbling in notebook

No. 22870

>>22867
He contacted her on Facebook after seeing a photo of her on a mutual friend's page and if it was just because he wanted her for work, he wouldn't have been messaging her privately. Her work for his company was being handled through her agency and without his presence.

>>22869
That's because it was pointed out on PULL. Just like the HK and dog shelter vlogs and sudden metal straw.

No. 22871

The day the fiancé got attention from other people/girls (on his Instagram) is the best day to marry him lol how desperate. Must lock him inside the cage before it’s too late. So scared he might be interested to other girls. Typical Taylor. Everything must be about her lol

No. 22872

>>22871
to be fair for her - you cannot marry so quickly in Hong Kong, it's very easy to get married, but you need at least one month of 'cool down' period between booking your ceremony and the actual wedding day.
I know it's always about her, but in this case it means they planned it for a while now.

No. 22873

I was so surprised to see on IG that they got married like that. I thought it was going to be some extravagant event with Taylor looking like a princess and having everyone fawn over her all day. I'm assuming they will still have a wedding to celebrate but not for months. I wonder why they rushed things, even if they had to give a months notice, that's still rushing. None of her family around, only her assistant? weird.

No. 22874

>>22873
I had weird vibes in Tom's bday video that she was giving hints she's pregnant, but don't quote me on that!

No. 22875

>>22871
Well everything you just typed there is wrong but…
Also tone down the a logging. Some girl having a low key wedding isn't worth the venom.

No. 22876

I actually felt bad for him. He always lived in the shadow of her. I mean look at his instagram, she should’ve just let him use his name. Those elbowsan xx, tripod san etc names are all just stupid. He is a successful businessman, and i think many people would learn, appreciate and respect him more if he actually post and talk about his business instead of posting all those rubbish contents about his relationship for her obsessed teenagers fans all the time. I mean, come on Tom. You are far more better and worth it than just being known as Taylor’s “elbowsan”.

No. 22877

>>22876
I have to agree with you on this one anon……let him shine as him….he is very hardworking and successful…..he should’ve known as him for his hardwork….not because of her all the time…everyone know he is your fiancé (well husband now), you don’t have to make it all about you all the time…..geez it amazes me how some people crave for attention these days smh

No. 22878

>>22873
She will probably have proper ceremonies in Canada and France. She's probably preggers and I can't wait for a kaka meltdown.

No. 22879

>>22873
It might just be for visa reasons. It's common for international couples to get legally married and have the ceremony later.

No. 22880

>>22876
>>22877
You guys act like she runs his instagram and makes him do this and that. He seems to be in on the elbow joke, so what's wrong with him using that name and wanting to be a part of this side of Taylor's life? He posts about cars and food and his life, which Taylor happens to be a part of, how is that her craving attention? This thread has the wildest anons is2g, one day Tom controls Taylor because "he is her sugar daddy" and the next day Taylor controls Tom because "she outshines him and is jelly". Makes me really nostalgic for that kiki milk >>22871 like wtf

I hope they don't get another dog that has been bred to be so unhealthy when they move into their new house, I feel bad for Rosie because she always has her tongue out and I bet she has health issues.

No. 22881

>>22876
>>22877


Since he runs a business he already has successful social media accounts with his name or brand. It's not like that account is his first ever. He works in digital marketing. It's just a fun account on the side and marks him becoming closer in her digital/Youtube life now they are married. She probably asked for this as a stipulation of the marriage, since him hiding in the shadows was gonna look weird once they were married.

Basically it's a good thing and I see no problems with it.
>>22880

Yeah there's no way that dog's healthy.

No. 22882

>>22874
Well she straight up said he wants to have a baby by next year. But if she were pregnant I feel like they’d be way more private about it until 12wks and then do a big surprise video. Not give it away by talking about it in a video but even then it was my first thought as to why

No. 22883

>>22877
seriously? go take a look at menclub.hk and you'll get a pretty good idea of how he makes his money. Their website and FB is full of girls showing tits and ass.

The cake Tay bought him has a phone with MC on it. It's the menclub logo. Taylor used to make little vids and interviews for them too. Most got removed once she announced she had a bf.

No. 22884

>>22883
Amazing find, anon!!! Is this why they were in Japan? So Tom could recruit some "models" for his Menclub video?

Interesting staff: blog.menclub.hk/home.php

No. 22885

"Tom Lip" is identified as the CEO of Menclub HK on official sites and documents, so there's no doubt.

No. 22886

>>22876
>>22877
Yeah he's a successful businessman, why would he want his wife's goofy content and personal stuff to come up when you google his name? Staying "elbow-san" is the smarter move.

No. 22887

>>22884
Yikes, this is beyond sketchy.

No. 22888

>>22884
Now we know why he is so coy about his business…sexygirls.com

No. 22889

File: 1542492672617.png (655.71 KB, 720x827, wp_ss_20181117_0025 (2).png)

>>22884
It's like a view into elbow-san's mind, including Taylor lookalikes

No. 22890

File: 1542493074333.png (938.06 KB, 720x1280, wp_ss_20181117_0027.png)

>>22889
"Tell us more about your business Tom"

"It's uhh. In digital marketing."

No. 22891

File: 1542493325352.png (131.79 KB, 720x1280, wp_ss_20181117_0029.png)

I wonder what is here in this "Private Zone"???

This is amusing me too much anons

No. 22892

There are so many porn stars and gravure models on that site. Businesses from that industry are usually connected to criminal elements in some way.

Why was Taylor working for Menclub and were those her first jobs with him?

He messaged her directly. Who's to say he isn't contacting other girls.

No. 22893

>>22892
So basically.. escorting service and prostitution? GFC

No. 22894

File: 1542513654630.jpg (346.01 KB, 1115x712, taylormarriage.jpg)

They got married and everyone is shocked that it was so quick and informal.

No. 22895

>>22892
She was blogging for BeautyExchange along with a bunch of other female influencers at that time.
This Mensclub thing looks like a digital Chinese Maxim. In addition to the creepy pics you posted, there are also lots of pictures of cars, motorcycles,games, tech stuff and other presumably "manly" things. It's just another sausage site.

No. 22896

File: 1542515966880.jpg (103.17 KB, 1081x602, rrt445t.JPG)

>>22889
>>22890
Cherry-picking is fun, huh.

No. 22897

>>22895
Someone said she did work directly for Mensclub in the past and I wasn't the one who posted those pics, although they're all from the front page of their website.

Did you actually look at their website? Check out the "Girls" page.
https://www.menclub.hk/girls/17871

Look at their page on the "Under-18" girl. It's not just "manly" things.
https://www.menclub.hk/girls/17871

No. 22898

>>22889
How is this creepier or worse than what other "men's" magazines post? Maxim has a gallery of barely clothed girls that their readers can vote on right this moment.

No. 22899

>>22898
Those two sisters, Erika and Marina, are still in high school.

No. 22900

>>22890
Those two girls are still in high school.

No. 22901

>>22897
>>22899
>>22900
Age of consent is 16 in HK so for them it isn’t breaking any laws. Like other anons said it’s like a Chinese maximum. Kinda questionable but not illegal

No. 22902

>>22898
>>22901
Moving the goal post and normalizing trash sites doesn't make it "okay".

Tom giving business advice to teenage fangirls atm while this is how he gets rich is a joke.

No. 22903

File: 1542542666721.jpg (117.17 KB, 850x850, 10511356_676564519059765_30984…)

>>22898
I was the anon who brought up menclub above. I actually don't know that it's any worse than Maxim, honestly. But I have a hunch that many of Taylor's pseudo-sexy schoolgirl "bedtime" pix were for menclub

No. 22904

File: 1542543090246.png (1.03 MB, 1807x924, Screenshot 2018-11-17 21.25.08…)

this is creepy though

No. 22905

This is the only evidence of menclub she left on her page: https://www.facebook.com/Taylor.R.Official/photos/a.542894092426809/589962937719924/?type=3&permPage=1

The comments are predictable

Unfortunately, only the text of the so-called interview is archived:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131221001957/http://menclub.hk/node/2599

No. 22906

Did some searching. So, um, when did she say she started dating Tom?

No. 22907

>>22897
eww that under-18 thing is like super softcore porn.

Just looking at these pics and having all of these adolescent girls looking at me just feels gross.

No. 22908

Do you remember when Taylor talked about an event where there were mirrors on the floor, and so everyone could see up the models' skirts?

Menclub helpfully linked to the press release with uncensored pictures from their FB page, tagging her and writing ~oh my god~

No. 22909

>>22908
this is an imageboard. post the pics

No. 22910

>>22902
That's true it doesn't, but let's be real you wouldn't give a shit about this if you didn't have a hateboner for the owner's girlfriend/partner. So spare us your moralizing. You're on a fucking chanboard.

No. 22911

>>22901
Just because porny photos of 16-year olds aren’t illegal in HK doesn’t change the fact that it’s messed up and gives new perspective to Taylor’s dolly phase and the wholesome image her fans have of Elbow-san.

Maxim is trashy but they don’t entice their audience with actual schoolgirls and talk up their under-18 status. Maxim almost looks classy in comparison.

No. 22912

>>22885
So this is just one of the several businesses he owns or what? Doesn't he also own BeautyExchange?

No. 22913

>>22912
yes. and Studio54. and CChannel.
all of which employed and promoted Taylor.

No. 22914

>>22904
girl in the middle was 14/15 at the time of the photo.

No. 22915

>>22911
Wait. So both Taylor and Kota were pedo pandering gravure-esque weebs who both got Asian husbands from dressing kawaii and acting softcore and cutesy. Meaning that even though Tay was copying Kota she still made out with a better deal than Kooter. She got what Kota wanted in HK while Kota was licking muff trying to keep working while she was also married to stay in the country. That entire time Tay had Tom funding his personal real barbie.

So Tay married a Chinese Kota fan who owns the kind of site that probably would have featured viral era Kota's hideous clevage shoops and spread eagle poses to get creepy guys fluffed up to schoolgirls. Say what you guys want and I think she does love him bc of how easy he makes her life but he's obviously attracted to her because she's immature and spoiled in addition to being pretty and white. She became the trophy Kota wanted to be.

No. 22916

>>22908
Did you really go through that many FB posts to find this? I'm looking through them and there's way too many posts to sort through. At least share the link, anon.

No. 22917

MC IG follows Taylor and… Peachmilky.

No. 22918

>>22915
This makes me think Tom went after Taylor because she was a kota clone. He had dozens of girls employed who looked just like Taylor but he chose to DM her over all the others? Although I guess none of the other girls had a kotaphase.

No. 22919

>>22916
https://www.facebook.com/menclub.hk/photos/a.153530161435047/497297700391623/?type=3&theater

Here's the link.

I searched their FB posts for Taylor to find stuff about her.

No. 22920


No. 22921

File: 1542571260890.png (567.38 KB, 558x783, Taylor and Tais.png)

Here's another classy post

No. 22922

>>22914
What's her name? I mean, you're sure she was 14/15?

No. 22923

>>22915
This post is so over-the-top, but Taylor did copy Kota's gross poses. I guess she saw how they could benefit her.

http://archive.is/DwS6k

"I’m proudest for not changing to fit the media. It would be a lot easier to be bigger if I just went that route and posed in a bikini. I don’t think I’m there yet. But I’m working hard to get there doing it properly."

kek Taylor ok

No. 22924

>>22922
100% sure. Kana Hashimoto is a famous Japanese idol/actress. That photo is from a commercial she did, not something Menclub took.

No. 22925

>>22911
This so much. It's not edgy to be okay with something that's exploitative. It goes against the wholesome "hardworking and never slutted it up" image the two put out.

>>22918
As the owner of the companies, he had pick of the litter to message and years to take out girls until one was dtf.

No. 22926

>>22925
Tay was probably not his first white model gf. She was just one old enough and plain enough to need a backup plan and guarantor to take her where she wanted to go.

No. 22927

>>22852
Wasn't she living with him and being supported by him before she ever moved to Japan? They met after she started copying Kota in HK but Taylor never worked enough as a model as a Kotaclone in JP to support herself on just youtube. When Tay announced her BF she qas already living in a house with him for like a year. He might not be her sugar daddy now but he probably was at first.

>>22923
I love how Taylor ended up getting everything Dakota wanted from her viral fame. If she had chosen to stay in Japan she would have all Dakota and Kiko's wishlist boxes checked off.

No. 22928

>>22927
In her kotaclone days she had tons of burando she wore once at best, high end makeup just for the girly packaging, and a fully decked out dolly room.

This was on top of translation and subtitling services, all to follow a temporary trend. None of that comes for free and it all got trashed as she moved onto instathot trends.

Meanwhile Koots is still reusing her VW knockoffs from taobao, kek.

No. 22929

>>22928
Remember those kawaii LE Pullips she bought just to throw in her closet? Those were like $500 or more each.

No. 22930

>>22928
>>22927
Inb4 her next video is all about how they kept their relationship ~secret~ at first to avoid sugaring suspicions

No. 22931

>>22929
I remember a thread where people freaked out over how she tossed those dolls around. People treat things poorly if they didn't work to pay for them in the first place though, she probably had no idea how much it was worth.

No. 22932


No. 22933

I liked their elopement video; Taylor looked so happy. Elbow awkward and nervous but he seems just that type of person.
Wonder if they got married so soon for visa reasons? Still hoping for a big ceremony

No. 22934

>>22933
It seems a bit sad but I am hoping for more too, a room with your family on skype is not good enough. I do think she looked great.

No. 22935

>>22889

>view into elbow-san's mind

>bags of potato chips

lol i'm ded

>>22891
Written in polite/formal Chinese:
"Private Room is limited to specially selected members of MenClub. We will have a specialist personally inspect the personal information of each registrant. Upon successfully becoming a member of the Private Room, we will have a specialist contact you either by telephone or e-mail.

Inside of the MenClub Private Room, you will will be in contact with a whole new, never before seen world that is exclusively for gentlemen.
If you sincerely would like to join the Private Room, please fill in the form below and kindly wait patiently:

Username:
Password:
First and last name:
Cell phone number:
E-mail address:
Why we need your membership:
Yearly income:"

y i k e s

No. 22936

File: 1542908475781.png (239.82 KB, 1232x996, Screen Shot 2018-11-22 at 12.1…)

I'll go ahead and translate the "interview" that >>22905 linked, too.

~~~
MenClub Christmas Goddesses* Special Issue~ Taylor R
Text: MenClub Editor Ah-K
Photos / video : Jou Fung / Taylor

The Christmas goddess special issue of MenClub is here! First up is the sweet Canadian gal, Taylor R!

Taylor R, who comes from Canada, looks exactly like a real princess. She's different from many Western chicks in that she has a Japanese flair. As such, she's become a big-name model in Hong Kong. Although Hong Kong is where Taylor found fame and success, she still makes sure to go back to Canada to celebrate the Christmas holiday every year.
"I am studying in Hong Kong, but Canada is full of interesting stuff. It snows over there, and I also really like catching up with my family and friends."

This year is no exception for Taylor: "I am going to go home and have Christmas dinner with my family. My grandma makes the best turkey in the world! I really miss my family, I can't wait to see them."

Unlike in Hong Kong, Christmas is not commercialized in Canada. Taylor said Christmas was an unforgettable part of her childhood.
"I used to believe in Santa Claus back then. When I saw all the trees that 'Santa' left under the tree, I felt so happy. If I become a mother one day, I'd like to let my children enjoy that experience too."

Taylor seems to receive a lot of gifts from her fans, so she stated frankly: "To be honest, I don't want to receive Christmas gifts anymore. I already have too much stuff!"

Taylor's homepage [links to her FB]

~~~

*Goddess is slang for hot girl, babe etc.
**LOL @ "Christmas is not commercialized in Canada"

No. 22937

>>22935
"Dating" service, alright

>>22936
"To be honest, I don't want to receive Christmas gifts anymore. I already have too much stuff!" Hahaha.

Someone asked about the MenClub logo on Eblow's IG but not even her fans at PULL caught on. And why is this thread still contained?

No. 22938

>>22937
It's unsaged now.

Stay focused on the milk and keep the sperging to a minimum and it'll stay that way.

No. 22939

>>22923
I wouldn’t have a problem with her being a trophy wife and taking thirst trap pictures if she didn’t act so high and mighty about being “pure”

No. 22940

>>22933
Either that or she's prego.

No. 22941

File: 1542937219420.png (333.87 KB, 326x496, 22ca23565402b532e4b7c49f146146…)


No. 22942

File: 1542937361526.png (55.4 KB, 720x187, Youtube Taylor.png)

>>22938
Y-yes we are free!

A comment on her YouTube. I didn't notice this while watching, but now I'm thinking how weird that is?

No. 22943

>>22942
That’s because they live in France and Japan right?

No. 22944

>>22942

for a Chinese family it is REALLY weird that his parents (especially mom) NEVER seem to show up in their lives. We've seen the sister in France but not the mom or dad.

We also know that Tom sold street food with his mom at a stall in a subway station in high school (and his mom didn't own the stall). Maybe the dad is either dead or the parents divorced. But where the fuck is Tom's mom? Chinese MILs are nosy af … they think their sons shit out rainbows and diamonds.

This wedding is suspicious as hell. The video where Taylor talks more about the elopement she sounds like she's sad and stressed but trying to pretend she's cool with it and happy for the sake of the camera/her fans. Tom doesn't sound like he has any emotion at all.

Something is "off" here :\ Taylor is such a girly girl, loves attention, loves trying food and outfits, planning things… Elopement is cool for some women but she 1000% seems like the kind of girl who would want a fairytale wedding. I hope I'm wrong but this seems very sad to me. :(

No. 22945

>>22944

Honestly, she's probably only sour that she didn't get some fancy wedding. They probably eloped because her visa was soon to expire and seemed convenient. This whole news of him basically owning a site with softcore porn of teens, and Taylor knowing this and dating/working for him anyways comes off sketchy. Maybe her good girl and hard work crap is really just her projecting. Like how Onion has to reinforce how brutally honest he is, so he states it every chance he gets just like she constantly states how "good" and "hard-working" she is. I find only liars have to repeat themselves as much as they do.


Knowing Taylor though, they're probably stilling going to have a ceremony but just hold off till spring.

No. 22946

>>22935
>world that is exclusively for gentlemen
>Why we need your membership:
>Yearly income:

Oh hi there escort services.

>>22944
>trying to pretend she's cool with it and happy for the sake of the camera/her fans

She probably isn't thrilled that she had to wait this long for the engagement and visa. By repeating that she's chill with a skype wedding, she makes it more obvious that she isn't. Kind of like when she cut her hair.

She's probably going to have proper wedding ceremonies later, so it doesn't seem sad. She doesn't have much else to vlog about unless she has a baby.

No. 22947

>>22938
Thank you!

>>22943
No, I think they only live in France. His uh "models" live in Japan.

Like:
https://ameblo.jp/riyokotakagi/entry-12364912273.html
Or:
https://instagrammernews.com/detail/1889213673059484132
And: https://mens-modern.jp/38957

Here's an interview with an HK AV girl:
https://ja-jp.facebook.com/menclub.hk/posts/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E9%A6%96%E4%BD%8Dav-girl-live/1392893424165375/

It's gone now but MenClub had an article called "Pretend Gay Get Laid"
https://zh-tw.facebook.com/tinyeeeee/posts/%E5%9F%BAfriend%E7%B8%BD%E6%9C%89%E4%B8%80%E5%80%8B%E5%8D%8A%E5%80%8B-%E7%9C%9F%E5%9F%BA%E7%84%A1%E5%95%8F%E9%A1%8C-%E6%89%AE%E5%9F%BA%E5%B0%B1%E5%94%94%E5%BE%97menclub%E6%96%B0%E6%96%87-%E6%89%AE%E5%9F%BA%E9%A3%9F%E8%80%81%E8%99%8Ehttpwwwmenclubhkwomen-relationshippreten/476935335757768/

No. 22948

>>22944
Initially the sudden marriage made me think that his parents or her grandma were passing away so they wanted to tie the knot before that. Kind of surprised I haven’t sern any theories in that vein anywhere I looked

No. 22949

Re-reading the thread, the elopement isn't as surprising as everyone thinks.
She even talks about it here >>22752

No. 22950

>>22944
Could be anything anon, his mum could be in a nursing home, drooling.

No. 22951

>>22949
Which reminds me…having a baby does not reduce the chance of ovarian cysts. They can happen to anyone with a womb.

No. 22952

Some weird/kinda gross mensclub videos
(start at 02:00ish)

No. 22953

>>22949
Oh that’s more plausible, good catch

No. 22954

>>22952

I have no idea what they're saying, but is this a "how to pick up white women on the street" video? It's so weird and creepy.


Just a question… But is it possible Taylor may have used Tom's escorting portion of the site?

No. 22955

>>22948
>Kind of surprised I haven’t sern any theories in that vein anywhere I looked

I guess it's because it wouldn't make her look like the heinous, gold digging bitch that many anons want her to be

>>22904
I don't think it's inherently wrong to own a dating service, but having under 20-yo (yes, I'm a prude) models and girls on there is fucking nasty and really makes me see Tom in a different light.

No. 22956

>>22890
>>22897
>>22899
>>22904
Wtf how did I miss this. This is not only sketchy, this is straight up disgusting. So much for the "wholesome Elbow-san".

>>22901
Age of consent is 16 in most countries but under-18 porn is still illegal in all of them… well, aside from HK, apparently. It's gross, no hateboner whatsoever involved since I've been subbed to Taylor for a long time, and you don't need to hate someone to acknowledge that their partner is creepy.

>>22941
The Mostrengas lurking will for sure be happy about this, but I'm disappointed. So… she was an escort?

No. 22957

>>22954
Taylor already had financial backing from her family to do modeling so she'd have little reason to. She's been silent about any relationships before Tom in HK though.

>>22955
There's no way this was just a dating service. There are apps for that. This is pick up artist and softcore content with exclusive membership for rich men, that alone proves that this is an escort service.

No. 22958

>>22956

>So…. she was an escort?


That's what I'm wondering. I don't hate Taylor, but I don't understand why everyone believes her online presence is the only "real one" while every other person on youtube is just showing a "persona" and is fake. Meanwhile, she was the girl that got her name out there by being ridiculously fake. Pretending to know Japanese, facial filler, faking her voice, photoshopping, concealing her age and dressing childishly while her boyfriend filmed her. I'm getting serious "age play" vibes from the two, especially with the fact Tay still has all her school girl outfits.

I feel like people are getting manipulated by her " I'm just like you " videos, where she complains of pimples and being emo.

No. 22959

Caught up with the thread due to recent shenanigans but I always thought the way she and Elbowsan met was weird? I didn't even watch her videos thoroughly but I did not know Elbowsan was 41?? She's pretty, she could've gotten literally anyone, and the fact that he fell in love with her over ~her personality~ when she looked the way she did was weird to me.
I agree with her when she said she didn't marry for a visa. If that was the case, she would've snatched it right away. I do agree with >>22948 that something happened within their family to spark such a fast decision. Super sad she didn't choose a wedding dress. She should really go into dress modeling.

No. 22960

>>22959
>the fact that he fell in love with her over ~her personality~ when she looked the way she did was weird to me.

Same, she was dressing and acting like a kawaii teenager while also copying one and being vague and dodgy about her age. If that's the personality he fell in love with then it's probably good Dakota never ended up with a career in HK.

No. 22961

>>22952
Eww.

Could the intro videos of the women on their channel actually be for their escort service? at the end of the video of this Japanese AV star, she says she'd really like to visit HK cause she's never been, wants to see the lights at night, eat noodles with someone who eats a lot, and visit Disneyland, all like she wants someone to take her there, not go on her own. It's a lot of trouble and money for short videos that don't get many views.

No. 22962

>>22566
I agree. Even in the thread starter it says she remains boring with not much milk.

No. 22963

>>22957
This, it seems like stupid ostrenga tinfoil to think Taylor was a escort during HK days. We've seen her portfolio, she was getting a lot of work in HK and comes from a rich family. She is also obviously not the type to do it ~for fun~.
Also, Men's Club seems more like a forum to me than specifically a escort site (I do belive they offer the service though).

No. 22964

>>22952
Oh no, when he "caught her like a Pokemon" when she's obviously a paid actress. You weren't kidding, it's creepy. I really wonder about the depth of Taylor's involvement with this site but I don't think we'll ever know.

No. 22965

>>22961
They seem like escort videos rather than modeling videos, I agree. She seems so nervous and scared, and unfamiliar with modeling. Compare to something like this
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zoWxfCzGOQ4
(Page 3 topless models. Tons of men are watching but the model isn't scared)

No. 22966

>>22964
>Taylor says they met because he wanted to work together
>Shifty about exact date they met (she always pauses and is vague about it)

I think maybe he wanted to hire her for this stuff, took a liking to her and then dated her instead. He likes her "personality" since he has his pick of hot girls running this site.
/tinfoil

No. 22967

File: 1543029077000.png (192.25 KB, 1317x829, taylor single article translat…)

>>737080
check out the url ("single white female again")

No. 22968

>>737080

>spouse conditions


Huh..

No. 22969

>>22967
And here's the URL. Perhaps someone can translate it more accurately.
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/financeestate/art/20130214/18164637

No. 22970

File: 1543030510685.png (921.31 KB, 1287x678, Taylor single - menclub.png)

>>22967
Menclub publicized Taylor's announcement about her single status.

(sorry, repost)

No. 22971

File: 1543032055085.png (289.93 KB, 720x846, Valentines.png)

>>22969
This translation is not great but it's Bing autotranslate. The rest of the article is about other people.

No. 22972

>>22967
Made me lol (although I suppose Kooters is forever the SWF in relation to Taylor)

No. 22973

>>22969
The article itself was somewhat choppy.
Essentially:

Single Doll-like Model Back on the Market
The very pretty doll-like model Taylor R, like Chrissie Chau (fellow model), has recently reverted back to being single and "back on the market." She broke up with her boyfriend (who works in the financial sector) of 4 years several months ago. Don't think that a model's love life is very exciting or that their Valentine's day is going to be extra romantic though. Taylor, who has been in 2 relationships, just enjoys cooking at home with her boyfriend (her specialty is seafood spaghetti) and watching movies.
She isn't worried about being lonely this Valentine's day with no boyfriend and plans on hanging out with her female friends. Her requirements list is very simple: his personality is the most important, and must be able to make her laugh and support her work. Pretty-boy male models are not her cup of tea, they're better off admired from a distance.

No. 22974

>>22949
>>22953

Not really. If you've ever planned a wedding you would understand better. I'm at the age where I am planning a wedding and everyone else around me is either also planning or had a wedding in the past couple years.

Literally EVERYONE goes through a phase where they consider eloping. Weddings seem overwhelming to plan at first.

But I only know like one or two couples who actually did go ahead and elope (both in Hawaii, and one doesn't really count because the bride grew up in Hawaii and they had a big reception in California afterwards).

People might decide to scale up or down the style of the wedding, but ultimately most couples realize that a wedding really symbolizes the biggest day of their lives and a chance to throw a party for all their family and friends. I've been to all manner of weddings from a $100k affair in NYC straight out of Bride Wars, to a $1k simple potluck in a public park where the bride made her own dress and her sister baked the cake type of thing. Traditional Catholic Mass hourlong snoozefest to secular 5 minute exchange of vows. Military weddings in full uniform, Southern weddings with country music and bbq, Chinese banquets with like 20 dishes and parental tea ceremony and 3 different dresses for the bride, Halloween wedding with the bride in a black dress… there are a million ways to do a wedding and very very few people actually want to elope. Even those who do elope would generally have their parents there…

A wedding is a huge deal because it basically presents the married couple to the world and shows everyone what kind of couple they are and gives their entire family and friends community a chance to have a sort of emotional fulfillment of understanding that they are a married couple now.

When I first watched the wedding video, I thought they were just doing the registration and then later on they would host a proper wedding. But in her second video she clarifies they don't have any immediate plans to do that.

This is hugely disappointing. Yes, we're all feminists and women don't need a white dress and a big shabang and it's acceptable to elope. But if you're watching Taylor R expecting a woman who doesn't act feminine or traditional then idk wtf to say to you. She's absolutely the kind of woman who would want a big dress and ceremony. Her whole life revolves around making herself pretty and filming herself so the world can see her. She's INCREDIBLY family oriented. She has stated over and over that she appreciates Elbow-san's family values and how he respects her family. This sudden marriage is like a slap in the face to her family I feel; even if they tell her it's okay and she says she is okay with it. Of course they would say they support her and are okay with it because they want to be supportive and loving towards family, but I bet that privately they are pretty damn disappointed. For more traditional, family-oriented people, weddings are as much for the family as for the couple themselves.

That's not even getting into the Chinese side of it. Chinese families are a million times more conservative and traditional than North American ones. Even very liberal free spirited Chinese people who studied abroad etc, their weddings are very traditional. They may privately complain but a HUGE part of Chinese culture is respecting your elders so if your elders tell you to do something, you do it. Many/most Chinese women are fully independent career women but for their wedding they will pour tea for their new in-laws (sign of obedience to the husband's parents) because that's just How It Is Done. Like with white people parents they will also view the wedding as a big family reunion, and often also they will invite all their business contacts. Many Chinese people complain that they don't know half the people at their own wedding because their parents wanted to make sure all their (the parents') friends are invited. Again the wedding is not just about the couple celebrating their love, but it is about presenting themselves as a couple to the family and the entire community.

In Chinese culture, women marry "into" the husband's family. So sometimes Chinese women marry white guys and get away with there not being a lot of Chinese elements or all the extended family and business contacts. But for Taylor. She is a woman. She has to show her loyalty to Tom's family. In Chinese culture she is now a part of his family. When she dies she will be buried with his family (traditionally Chinese have family tombs, not individual grave stones like in America). On Tomb-sweeping day she should go to worship his ancestors.

Even if Tom isn't super duper traditional, these elements probably play a role to some extent. Not doing them at all would be like an American couple not doing Thanksgiving or Christmas at all. Again not unheard of, but if someone told you they had 0 plans for Thanksgiving, you'd think it kinda suspect right? (Not in a "I can't afford the flight home" way, in a "I don't have a single member of my entire extended family I'd spend the holiday with" way). It's just suspicious.


I can't figure out quite what's going on here, but it's definitely not as simple as "Oh we just decided to elope". There's some bigger issue going on. Chinese people don't "just elope". Some white people may just elope, but not people with Taylor's personality and interests and family relationships/values.

We could speculate wildly on what, but I certainly don't have any receipts on anything. Instinctively I could imagine :

–His parents had a nasty divorce. This would explain zero contact with one side of the family, as traditionally when Chinese parents divorce the custody goes 100% to one of the parents and the other half of the family never sees them again– but then where is the half of the family Tom WAS raised by? He mentions a mom so where is his mom?

–Money issues. Heis mom is poor and he's baller but we never hear about him giving money to his mom which is another huge negative in Chinese culture. I can't really overstate how horrific it would be in Chinese culture for a first/only/oldest son to leave his mom in poverty. Or maybe he gave her a bunch of money and she mismanaged it?

–The mom died recently. This one is a good theory since if she did die, they would have to get married within 100 days according to Chinese culture, or else wait 3 years. And Taylor mentioned that they wanted to get married in less than 3 months. However, this is still deeply unsatisfying in that we never see Taylor interact with Tom's mom, or even mention her. Maybe she doesn't want to be on camera, sure, but Taylor could mention her if the two had a relationship ("My future MIL taught me how to make this soup"; "Elbow-san and I just got back from visiting his mom").

–The mom's family refuses to accept Taylor. I find this extremely plausible. The only time we see Taylor with family is at Tom's sister's house and his sister also married a white French guy so the sister probably doesn't mind. But maybe the mom is very traditional – she might have even had a Chinese woman lined up for Tom. If Taylor started out as Tom's escort/sugar baby before evolving into genuine love, I could imagine his mom being very disappointed. "Those loose Western women have no morals, can't cook proper Chinese food for my son, will not obey me as a dutiful daughter in law, will not ensure our family's heritage and traditions are properly followed…" etc. This kind of stereotypical thinking is common among older Chinese women – they don't care if their daughter marries a white guy because "daughters marry out anyway", but the son marrying a white girl is their worst nightmare because they want a Chinese daughter in law they can boss around. (Most Chinese women won't let themselves be bossed around these days anyway, but in their imagination white women are even more willful).

The part that doesn't make sense with this is that a girl like Taylor should have been able to win over Tom's mother by now. Taylor isn't a loud arrogant white woman. She's very much so the kind of ideal woman that a Chinese mother-in-law would want: Slim and pretty, mild mannered, cares more about family and home than about own career ambitions (won't outshine her son), she's clearly the more submissive one in the relationship with Tom (she mentioned that he makes all the big decisions, all the first moves, and she mostly manages daily household matters like what groceries to buy which is what a traditional Chinese wife is expected to do), she very much so wants children which is the #1 thing Chinese mothers hope for is grandchildren. It's been years. If the issue is that Tom's mother won't accept Taylor, then why? Furthermore, how would Tom be okay disobeying his mother if it's causing that much of a rift in the family?

If the above sounds way too old fashioned to you, you don't know Chinese culture well enough. This stuff sticks incredibly hard. I know families who've been in the United States for multiple generations and still they adhere to many elements of this culture (for instance, finding the idea of putting grandparents in a nursing home absolutely abhorrent). I know people whose bio parents were horribly abusive and irresponsible to the point that were basically raised by grandparents from childhood, but as adults they still fork over 1/3 of their paycheck to their absentee bio parents because "We are Chinese and we show respect to our elders". I literally have never heard of a Chinese couple eloping. It's kinda hard to overstate how shocking it would be.(holy shit)

No. 22975

>>22974
wow great thanks

No. 22976

>>22974
Are you okay?

No. 22977

>>22974
>she will be buried in his family's tomb

please relax

No. 22978

>>22974
kek calm down

No. 22979

>>22977

..what part of chinese culture don't you get lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestor_veneration_in_China

No. 22980

>>22974
>>22974
anon you could've literally just summarized this and said:
>eloping the way they did is very fishy since Tom's Chinese parents probably wouldn't approve of how they did it.

No. 22981

>>22974
>anons acting like we're on PULL and care about this long-winded diatribe.

No. 22982

File: 1543088172340.jpeg (92.98 KB, 643x820, 1C5E5737-8822-48D5-BB59-0C6A53…)


No. 22983

>>22981

then read>>737383 then


>eloping the way they did is very fishy since Tom's Chinese parents probably wouldn't approve of how they did it.


i would just say

>eloping is INCREDIBLY HORRIBAD AND BIZARRE and it is worth wondering why


but I'm trying to head off the wypipo replies of "It's 2018 it's okay to elope" because in chinese culture it's really really not. It'd be like if someone told you "Instead of going to Thanksgiving dinner, I'm just going to shit on my grandma's fine linens and then eat the family dog".

No. 22984

>>22983
For someone who claims to be an expert about ~Chinese culture~, you sure are making an assload of over generalizations. China is still highly traditional and patriarchal, that’s true; however, with the changing tides of modernism, feminism and captialism, as well as the growth of larger metropolitan cities and more opportunities for education and careers, the younger generation doesn’t hold on as tightly to those traditional values as their parents and grandparents might.

If you’re 100% certain that Taylor will be buried in her husband’s family tomb, you probably don’t understand China as much as you think you do.

No. 22985

>>22984


What part of china are you from? Hong Kong is a lot more traditional than the Mainland because of the Cultural Revolution. It's a huge fucking problem in Hong Kong in particular because they have no space
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/23/world/asia/hong-kongs-drive-for-green-burials-clashes-with-tradition.html

If you're from the mainland please don't tell me about traditional Chinese culture tbh, they don't do half the traditional stuff people in Hong Kong/Taiwan/overseas Chinese still do. I met a girl from the mainland who didn't even know what ghost month was, lol

No. 22986

>>22983
Because all "wypipo" are muricans, amirite?
Fuck off with this shit.

No. 22987

>>22974
This is the longest blog I've ever seen on lolcow

No. 22988

File: 1543090020463.jpg (404.83 KB, 1920x1080, kuo-tomb.jpg)

here's an example of a graveyard in Hong Kong where everyone is from the Kuo family

No. 22989

File: 1543090177010.jpg (367.26 KB, 696x464, limtomb.jpg)

and a different style for Lim tomb.

Honestly just because posters here aren't familiar with traditional Chinese culture doesn't mean it doesn't matter. Would you tell Taylor that Christmas doesn't matter? She and Tom have said plenty of times they have worked through cultural differences.

idk why people are resistant to the idea that Tom, a 40 year old born and raised in Hong Kong in a Hong Kong Chinese family, educated in Hong Kong entirely (even college), who also worked most of his career in Hong Kong, would have cultural attributes of a Hong Kong Chinese person

No. 22990

>>22974
i'm using this as a pasta from now on, thanks

No. 22991

>>22983
Haha I'm enjoying the sperging that is happening itt, but also the stuff about eloping being incredibly culturally jarring is very interesting to me. Would tally with >>22942

No. 22992

>>22974
this post is a great argument for a stricter text limit

No. 22993

>>22985
>people from mainland China aren’t part of Chinese culture

whoa there, partner

No. 22994

>>22993

lol i swear to god y'all are just trying to make me sperg out further. yes mainland China wiped out its own culture in the 1960s and 1970s.
http://theasiadialogue.com/2016/07/14/chinese-culture-after-the-cultural-revolution/

No. 22995

>>22963
Nta, but we can't say for sure that she can't have possibly done some sort of sex work in HK, not when photo evidence as >>22941 exists

No. 22996

>>22979
yeah obviously dipshit but how much of a sperg do you have to be to bring up how a youtube vlogger will be buried

No. 22997

>>22994
No need to imply that I don't know what the damn Cultural Revolution is. That doesn't mean that mainland China isn't still Chinese. Get your head out of your ass, anon.

No. 22998

There's no doubt that Tom Lip is the CEO of MenClub, so Taylor's fans can stop saying "IF he's the CEO."

"Interview with Tom Lip, CEO of Beauty exchange HK and MenClub HK":
https://issuu.com/msahkustbrio/docs/msa_annual_journal_2014

He's also the owner of Environmental Informatics Group (EIG).

No. 22999

>>22996

the same amount of sperging that is needed to make a comment like "I wonder if they will spend Christmas with Taylor's family" or "What do you think Tom will give Taylor for her birthday". It's just basic stuff people who are married do.
Seriously your ignorance about Chinese culture is cringy. Aren't even white people usually buried with their spouse? Why is it a big deal to point out that Chinese people are usually buried near not only their spouse but also their ancestors on the paternal side?

>>22997

So the point of "people don't do this in mainland China" would be great if Tom was from mainland China, which he's not

No. 23000

Even if it was two white people, you don't think it'd be weird if they got married without ANY member of one side's family present? Are y'all really that cold that you don't want to have your own parents at your own wedding.

No. 23001

>>22995
How is that picture proof of anything except an embarrassing experience that she actually mentioned herself in a video? It happened at HK fashion week. She was still wearing underwear in that picture. It was a stupid red carpet design that caused it not deliberate flashing on her part.
Just because Tom owns an undeniably sketchy/gross website that's like an EA version of Maxim/Esquire doesn't mean that Taylor was a prostitute. And even though I don't like her at all and think that Tom's skeevy af, I think that branding her an escort is a bridge too far.

No. 23002

I'm convinced she got pregnant and they had to have a hasty wedding. Here >>22752 Taylor is talking about how thirsty she is for his babies and wanting to elope so it wouldn't shock me if she made good on that desire. The fact that they aren't planning a proper ceremony anytime soon could hint that she will have to wait til after giving birth.

Yes it's strange that Tom's family isnt involved at all but maybe he just isn't on good terms with his family. As for Tays not sure what her excuse is since she's obviously close with her family. But people elope with no family involvement all the time, though it usually indicates bad blood or whatever.

No. 23003

I'm finding this conversation absolutely ridiculous. Taylor and Tom both seem like culturally open minded people. To suggest she's obviously devastated they didn't have a wedding because she likes dressing up and Christmas? That's absurd. She looked thrilled and probably wouldn't have heavily publicised it if she were crying inside. She moved to Asia alone at a very young age, she's clearly not bothered by massive cultural differences, and has said Tom prefers Japan. It's entirely plausible he's not that traditional, and as someone pointed out upthread, maybe his parents are dead. The whole argument that their eloping is scandalous is reductive of them as people.

Excuse me if anything is wrong with this post- first time.

No. 23004

>>23002
Context matters.
She was messaging her family while she was in the hospital recovering from surgery, miserable, uncomfortable, and probably on god knows what. I took that whole stream of messages as her being incredibly grateful and appreciative of Tom's kindness and in typical Taylor fashion hyperbolically expressing her feelings.

No. 23005

>>22998
Yup, further proof: if you google "Tom Lip" you should get a Linkedin that has a picture of him and both beauty exchange and menclub listed as websites.

No. 23006

>>22974

>is this 2018

>what is free will
>40 year old guys with money who regularly date immature 20-somethings would never dare break a long standing cultural law

If this isn't Kiki then she has inspired others to follow in her way.

No. 23007

>>23004
It's more of a "deal" because she made the engagement and trying onndresses out to be such bug deals. Then suddenly, out of nowhere they elope? It's weird. Unless this is all some elaborate clickbait scheme and she'll reveal her wedding date & location in a future video.

No. 23008

>>23003
Doesn’t she say directly in the video that they’re buying property etc and it’s a million times easier if they’re married? And then she doesn’t have to keep renewing her entertainment visa (she’s really not doing any modeling work now so maybe trouble with that)

No. 23009

>>23007

Tinfoiling here, but I am just waiting for her to announce that she's pregnant. That is how this shotgun wedding read to me. Especially for Taylor who loves to organize events, to skip what is (arguably) the biggest event of your life.

No. 23010

Seeing her family vlog really killed me, honestly. She is so beautiful
, her family is so beautiful, and she wastes her genes marrying some creepy asian toad. If I were her parents I would have disowned her for being some gwailo/white monkey whore, just fetish for asian men.
>>22952
This just reinforces it. There are definitely white women who go to asia for a confidence boost since so many asian men want to date "foreign blonds".

No. 23011

>>23006
Scrolling down I was surprised to see fucking tomb pictures by this newfag who loves to generalize asians, kek

This is some next level shit that needs to go on an lolcow hall of fame page, alongside Kaka's posts. It would be great if it was Kaka but it doesn't sound like her.

No. 23012

I think she’s definitely pregnant because I saw a picture on her stories where she asked which shoe she should put on that night, she was wearing a really tight skirt and you could see a tiny belly. She is sometimes insecure about that area but not that night? (I can’t find the picture anywhere)

No. 23013

>>23012
ok but she literally said in her elopement faq that she isn't pregnant and isn't even trying right now.

No. 23014

>>23012
i also saw no belly in that pic. The skirt had ruching. She looked tiny.

No. 23015

I've never seen such reaching in a thread. this is why the taylor thread is constantly put on auto sage.

any cross-cultural marriedfags will know what a nightmare it is trying to organise this shit. deciding what country you will do the ceremony in, what type, flying relatives across the globe especially if they are old or have health issues or a bunch of kids or whatever. and on top of that making sure everyone is happy.

taylor and tom have money but they aren't billionaires like some would have you believe. honestly i think a lot of this has to do with them buying property. as some anons have mentioned above it makes a lot of things easier in both HK and canada if they are married. PLUS if you are planning to buy property why are you going to piss away money on a party?

>inb4 biggest day of muh lyff


she mentioned a couple of times that they had some big things coming up that they were going to be busy with so they probably eloped just to get the whole marriage thing out of the way with as little stress as possible.

i know lolcow loves a conspiracy but the levels of sperging in this thread are wild

No. 23016

File: 1543142576035.jpeg (96.41 KB, 750x750, 83E3420A-CD40-4743-89EB-A98560…)

FOR ALL THOSE SPECULATING TOM’S AGE:

if you go to his linkedin profile, there is a section for education. it says he started university in 2000, so we can assume he was 18 at the time. deduct 18 from 2000, you get 1982, so he should be turning or turned 36 this year.

No. 23017

>>23016
And Taylor is what, almost 30? They're actually closer in age than I would have guessed.

>>22974
This is why this thread was in autosage, jfc.

No. 23018

>>23016
The PULL invasion needs to stop. He's not an american who went straight to college and he's long past 36 if you look up his chinese name.

No. 23019

>>23018
How so, anon? Most chinese people that I have met went to college straight after high school. I don't doubt it because he looks a bit older to me but it's entirely possible.
Also kek Taylor's LinkedIn says she is a "Nutrition Student".

No. 23020

He is 41 or now 42 since he just had birthday - it was said in fiancé tag

No. 23021

>>23016
they already said he's mid-40s (I forgot the age) in their FAQ video. If anything, they fudged it younger, not older, jesus

No. 23022

>>23015
My not-tinfoil is it was to make signing off documents relating to the house build easier when tom is at work. She can sign off as Mrs Lip (?) is that the name, rather than Taylor Richmond which makes her seem like a random. It was definitely for legal reasons which she even says in the video.

She will probably have a big party when she goes back to Canada next time. However it's still weird that his family appeared to have no involvement. The real milk this week is finding out what his "business" is.

No. 23023

It doesn't explain why Tom's family wasn't involved in the wedding, but new tax laws and regulations in both China and Canada were implemented this fall to discourage Chinese from investing in Canadian property. I don't know if that applies to HK buyers.

No. 23024

File: 1543231203470.jpg (124.38 KB, 1080x842, tomparents.jpg)

Tom is currently doing a Q&A on Instagram and someone asked this.

Now we know why his family/parents weren't there.

No. 23025

>>23023
He's married to a Canadian citizen, it won't apply to him.

No. 23026

>>23024
I'm sorry for his loss but this just makes >>22974 even more funny

No. 23027

>>23024
oh man this is just sad. can't we just let them get married in peace why do people have to ask him why his parents weren't at their wedding? if they weren't there there's probably a good reason.

No. 23028

>>23027
>can't we just let them married in peace
do we force you to sperg? at least sage. This thread seem to attract pulltards

No. 23029

>>23025
That was my point. It could have sped up their marriage.

>>23028
Someone linked to here on PULL and now her defenders are trying to derail this thread.

Taylor has to be going crazy now that her husband's tastes have been revealed, but she can't exactly get Tom to shut down MenClub.

No. 23030

>>23029
Even if Taylor had the power to do so she wouldn't. Men's club shutting down is saying bye bye to her lavish life.

No. 23031

>>23029
it's one fucking person, calm your tits.

also, doubt taylor cares, she knew this when she started dating him. and i am sure that her ass kissers will find a justification for all this shit and move on.

No. 23032

>>23029
>Someone linked to here on PULL and now her defenders are trying to derail this thread.
Doubtful, given that basically no one is defending her on PULL.
>>23031
>also, doubt taylor cares, she knew this when she started dating him.
I'm sure she did and he doesn't hide it at all. In the most recent Q&A he did he was asked about about and answered that it was his company's "Men's Marketing" publication.
I'm sure she and he just consider it to be one of his businesses, and taking into account that most of Menclub content is pretty tame, I'm not surprised.

No. 23033

>>23032
Of course she knew about MenClub. She used to work for them. It's already been covered.

No. 23034

>>23000
Have any of you spergs considered that they may have been there but dont want to be plastered on social media?
They probably have private photos with his family as well.

No. 23035

>>23034
Nm didnt see this >>23024

No. 23036

File: 1543347471203.jpeg (308.54 KB, 750x1175, 0B6EFD0F-C552-42A0-9ADE-D0D185…)

Apparently they moved to Toronto now

No. 23037

File: 1543347475547.jpg (142.96 KB, 1080x789, tayl.jpg)

I'm confused.
I thought they were staying in HK, hence the new apartment that's being built.

No. 23038

>>23037
Could be for visa or business reasons, maybe

No. 23039

Rewatching this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJsHVFmoa34

Pretty interesting that Tom promised it would be in Canada and her grandparents would be there. Neither of those things were true!

No. 23040

>>23036
Weird, then why didn't they wait a few days to get married so her family could be there

No. 23041

>>23036
>>23037

>planning big wedding in HK

>elope without warning
>suddenly move to Canada a week later

Something isn't kosher. Why would they move to Canada if Tom's business ia based in Hong Kong? I thought the reaaon Taylor gave up on Jaoan was because she loves HK more anyway.

No. 23042

File: 1543349900735.jpg (15.99 KB, 642x71, ig.JPG)

>>23037

so they have two places to stay? What?

No. 23043

>>23042
They were looking at apartments in Toronto a few months ago so they have a place in each country

No. 23044

>>23043
How much time are they planning on spending in Canada every year that they bothered to buy a place there as well?

No. 23045

>>23041
>>23042
>>23043
not trying to blogpost but many hk natives are buying property in either usa or canada in preparation for being assimilated into china. even if they own businesses in hong kong, it's much safer to have an overseas option.

No. 23046

>>23043
Yea but to say „we moved here now” sounds like they’re gonna stay a little longer.
Biggest freaking teaser/clickbait-to-come for her Vlogmas

No. 23047

>>23036
They want to start a family, so probably going to stay in Toronto and hang out with Taylor's family for the holidays. I'm sure her husband is important enough in his company to work remotely at times. They can fuck around probably until they have kids who are school age.

No. 23048

>>23043
um anyone else jealous at how rich they are wtf

No. 23049

>>23048
Totally, I don’t think she deserves it just because she is lucky - I don’t say I deserve it more than her but I know plenty people who should be rewarded in life like her yet they only get middle fingers from life.
Even thought her family is wealthy looking at the eldest sister without Tom she wouldn’t enjoy life like this, even her YT career is all thanks to his support (financial and the fact she doesn’t need to have an actual job) so yeah, I think she’s just one of those lucky people.
Life is easy if you’re pretty and old guys like your cute baby image.

No. 23050

>>23048
Most anons in this thread give off that vibe.

No. 23051

>>23049
Life is "easy" like this when you come from money because people who have money like this actually avoid people who don't, because they don't want people asking them how they afford everything so they never have to admit they don't have to work as much as other people. Taylor got lucky but I kind of saw it coming, she comes from money and is spoiled and girls like her don't trade down or throw away handouts like that just to prove themselves. Real life is really hard when you don't have a team of people looking out for your welfare and even lazy girls like Taylor know that. She married Tom to guarantee her lifestyle, I doubt they would have ended up together if Taylor hadn't been an ageplayer/model and she was just some random pretty blonde working for his company at a desk

No. 23052

>>23043
The video is not available anymore. Seems like she's reading here

No. 23053

Do you people even watch Taylor, she has been talking since long time that they will get a place in both countries

No. 23054

>>23053
Don't you think something is up because she removed the video where she is talking about it? Or maybe she just want to make it a big announcement for moar views

No. 23055

>>23052
>>23054
It's still there
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2NvDZ9RMOQ&t=36s
Apparently it just isn't showing up as embedded.

No. 23056

>>23048
I mean she fucks a creepy old guy who is into "dolly" girls to earn this. So I'm not really jealous of Taylor, she is doing a job I could never do.

No. 23057

>>23056
I could never marry someone who's bussiness is exploiting underage women and marketing the female sex as just subservient slabs of meat you can flip through like you're at the supermarket.

No. 23058

>>23057
and then It´s super weid how he wants a babygirl so bad! on pull are a lot of sceenshots from Toms Q&A on insta

No. 23059

>>23058
Would it be weird if Taylor wanted girl boy just as bad?

No. 23060

Sage for non-contribution, but this is completely puzzling to me and I have to ask- why do you people watch this person? What compels you to be a fan of her? She doesn't have any talents or produce anything of value. You don't learn anything by watching her videos. She's not a trainwreck so you can't even track her downfall as with most cows here. Why the fanfare? Why do so many people on this thread seem emotionally attached to her and her life? She's just a normal person on par with Onision's wife. Even if you're interested in expat life in Japan and Hong Kong, there are surely more interesting people to follow, right? I feel like the average corporate expat would live a much more interesting and authentic life in those countries.

No. 23061

>>23060
She's fun. That does it for me.

No. 23062

>>23060
because she's pretty.

why is there a lolcow thread on her? see >>23048 >>739438

this is the first time i've been in this thread in a year so don't accuse me of being a white knight; she's objectively beautiful and has an easy, spoiled life that a lot of anons here would love. taylor's place on this site originated from kiki's psychotic jealousy, so it's not hard to believe that others fee lthat way.

No. 23063

>>23060
For me, I know Kiki still must lurk here and I enjoy reading up about Taylor having everything Kiki and Kota wanted for almost nothing. I like to visualize Kiki seething at her computer.

No. 23064

>>23063
damn those threads were a trip lmao
i remember reading through and being amazed at how she had adapted the lingo and everything so that it wasnt as obvious until you went back and read all her posts together

No. 23065

>>23063
It’s almost like Dakota is the dollar store version of herself and Taylor is the $10,000 version. She’s the version of Dakota where everything went right, her life ended up truly going exactly to plan. Kiki and Dakota will never have what Taylor has.

No. 23066

>>23065
Whatever one thinks of Dakota, this is a pretty weird thing to say.

Sage for personal opinion:
I am occasionally envious of two things Taylor has:
- a loving family
- money

That's it. She has shown herself pretty deficient in character and personality. Her desperation to be liked and go viral is unhealthy. Her vapid lifestyle, swinging from trend to trend, is pretty undesirable as well. She is the most basic of basic women: Starbucks, fake gluten allergy, obsessed with dieting, loves Kardashians, took 3 weeks to read Girlboss. She grew up in a bilingual country and never learned French. She lived in Japan and HK and never learned either language. She is superficial. And add to that the Menclub stuff - it's not a picture of a stable woman.

Dakota has a ton of flaws. But I give her credit for truly immersing herself in Japanese. She may speak with rude forms, but she can speak. It shows a certain intelligence and business savvy. Now, she needs to apply that to her job (modeling/talent/whatever), because gaining weight and dressing horribly and lying and photoshopping and DCMAing everything is terrible for business. But maybe she'll ultimately apply her intelligence to something else. I guess we'll see. We don't have proof that Dakota has a sugar source (though it is likely); no matter what Taylor says, it is clear Tom Moneybags is footing all the bills.

I personally don't like or want to be like either of these women, but just because Taylor looks somewhat better physically and lives a luxurious lifestyle - I would not say that is the $100,000 version of Dakota.

Dakota could get back in the game by writing a tell-all book.about her crazy enmeshed family and what it was like growing up in that toxic waste dump. I might actually buy it.

No. 23067

>>22555
>>23060

She's not super fascinating, but there's enough there to keep me interested. I'm mostly amused by what an idiot she is. Even the most basic, widely-known things elude her. Like how she hadn't heard of "something borrowed, something blue" until her wedding day, or how she noted that fashion often moves in cycles and was amazed by her own profundity kek

She's just a pretty little idiot with an easy life who, despite living abroad for so long, has never managed to cultivate any valuable insights into the world around her. That's funny to me.

No. 23068

>>23067
I agree, but she was most interesting during her dolly days where every video was fake. She's currently interesting due to her husband's shady partnerships and income sources finally being revealed.

It gets boring when newfags think people must be jealous of Kota or Taylor. I'm neither and that seems to be a hard concept to grasp. We knew the spending money sources were shady from the start, it just took time for the reveal and that's the entertainment.

>>23064
The joke was that kaka never adapted the lingo, people always call her out on replies because she posted the same way or opinions each time. She'd get fired up about being called things like bald. In some ways Kaka is as unadaptable as Taylor.

No. 23069

>>23066
Taylor may not be doing much now and certainly is living a pretty indolent lifestyle, but at least for the first 7 or so years of her career she hustled and worked a lot. You can tell by how full her old modeling portfolio was. And it was just working model stuff. Lots of campaigns, editorial, catalogue. At 23 (same age as Kota now) she was modeling full time during the day and studying nutrition at night. What is Kota doing now exactly other than scamming freebies out of acquaintances. Also Taylor worked at a shitty minimum wage hostessing job at a crappy restaurant as a teenager. Call me when Kota is ever humble enough to do something like that.
No question, Taylor is legitimately terrible at language. It's obvious even in her native English. Cantonese is a lot harder to learn than Japanese as well. And unlike Kota, Taylor isn't confident in herself which makes putting yourself out there much more difficult. Dakota otoh was 16 when she came to Japan an age when it's generally a lot easier to learn learn a second language. This explains why her pronunciation is good basically, that and having good ear. Kota also thought that she was hot shit and talked like it. Confidence makes it a lot easier to learn and use a language. Most importantly, she was living with a Japanese guy which was pretty evident from the way she spoke. Finally, it took her 3 years to become proficient enough to be able to be on Japanese television. Taylor didn't live with a native speaker, and was 10 years older.

And if you want to talk about deficient character, Dakota and her family bullied other foreign models, most likely paid for her to go viral, and even now acts like a complete cunt when she thinks that she can get away with it. Plus, Dakota lied about having a deadly form of cancer less than a year ago in order to hide having a cosmetic procedure done. Which is still beyond the pale for me.

No. 23070

>>23069
I think they're both shit, just different flavors of shit, and I slightly respect hints of general intelligence more than I respect Taylor's O-faces and overdrawn lips in front of cameras. You can stop defending the poor dear now. She's not confident so she has a Youtube and Instagram account full of her filtered and photoshopped mug. OK then.

I moved to a foreign country as an adult, didn't live with a native speaker, and I could speak the language decently within a year. After two years, I was much better, and after the third year, I would call myself conversationally/everyday fluent. There were no topics I couldn't discuss at that point - the question was only how detailed. And no, I never took a class. Native speakers in my environment corrected me.

Taylor could learn a language if she wanted to try. But she preferred to pretend.

No. 23071

>>23070
Yeah I don't buy that Taylor isn't confident. It's part of her brand to appeal to younger girls who watch the videos, but at the same time make them feel insecure and need to buy whatever she's buying or do whatever she's doing.

It takes a lot of balls to dress up in ridiculous outfits for attention (when it wasn't even work), pay someone to record or take pics of posing extra in public, and constantly be overexposed down to the bathroom things.

I'd say Kota has less confidence since we never see her real face or anything real of her bc she knows she looks like shit. She puts tighter controls on what we get to see.

But yes, they're both lazy in different ways. It may be easier to learn languages when younger, but that doesn't mean it's impossible - especially when you have the means and free time to make the conscious choice.

No. 23072

>>23070
I'm not defending her. I'm offering an explanation as to why she gives up learning languages. She obviously hates making mistakes and learning a language is about being willing to make mistakes. She's not a confident speaker. Kota is and has been from the start.

No. 23073

Why does Menclub follow Sophie (peachmilky) and did Sophie and Taylor ever interact? I could've sworn they avoided each other most of the time Taylor was in Tokyo despite all of the mutual friends.

No. 23074

>>23073
You might already have part of your answer there, friend. Jealousy perhaps?

No. 23075

>>23073
Taylor seemed like an outsider to the jvloggers for the longest time tbh. Everyone seemed to be really close except for her, who needed viewers and got better attention by attaching to Venus.

No. 23076

I always envied Taylor's family and how involved they are with eachother. It could just be ~them being rich~ but I really like how they are connected whenever something happens or they come over to visit to celebrate something.
Kind of sad I don't get to see Rosie, though.

No. 23077

>>22920

BTW in the article they write about how Taylor is wearing underwear with a flower print at the upskirt event and are fantasizing about he she could "show everything" like one of the other girls did.

No. 23078

>>23077
Really?! Thanks for that translation.

No. 23079

>>23060

sage but I never really watched Taylor until I came across her in the Venus/Margo thread and made Margo screech, so of course I had to have a watch

Now I think her vlogs are pretty relaxing and I like to have them on in the background while doing internet stuff.

No. 23080

>>23077
I'm so amazed all of this milk was missed. This little update has been fun to read!
I wonder what else she is in that there is to find? If she wasn't in much of the photos on the site or videos, is it safe to assume she was more involved in the "gentleman's club" portion of the site behind a paywall?

No. 23081

>>23080
>is it safe to assume she was more involved in the "gentleman's club" portion of the site behind a paywall

No. They were already dating by the time she appeared on it. Menclub started in late 2013/2014 according to Tom. The "gentleman's club" is a dating service affiliated with and sharing customers with an Australian dating site, Datetix. This feature started in 2015.
Promoting your girlfriend on your website is sketchy but not in the way the you are implying.

No. 23082

File: 1543887050720.jpg (399.84 KB, 640x964, 1389618279_b1ef.jpg)

>>22920
>>23077
>upskirt event

What the heck kind of event was this? This isn't wholesome or funny at all.

No. 23083

>>23082
It literally says it on the wall. It was an official Hong Kong fashion week event that happened to have an extremely unfortunate design for it's red carpet. Starzpeople sent Taylor and their other models there.

No. 23084

You guys are hilarious. She was on the site! She is a model and was in suggestive photo shoots! ACTUAL PROSTITUTE.

No. 23085

>>23081
This isn't true. Menclub announced her single status in Feb 2013. >>22970

She was somehow affiliated with the site earlier than that, or they would not have announced it like this. I'm not sure exactly when Tom and Taylor started dating, but it would have been after this announcement, presumably.

There are a few archive.org hits for the website in 2012. Most say "coming soon" but the website must have gone live in October or November 2018 based on the snapshot on Nov 30.

Given that Tom contacted Taylor in 2012, he probably contacted her to do things for Beautyexchange. (There's a post on his FB site dated Dec 16, 2012, where he says "BE girls rock" - there's a thumbnail of a now-deleted Taylor video included in the screenshot.) But she also must have been affiliated with Menclub in its primordial stages, as there are FB posts about her in very early 2013, including the weird one announcing that she's single and asking if any Menclub readers have the balls to date her.

No. 23086

>>23077
Where exactly did you read this, anon?
Because from the same article…
>而TaylorR.就露出花花底褲,認真冇陰功,有邊個會諗到簽個名都會走光先?最慘係佢哋全部都唔知情。
(And) Taylor R. revealed floral underwear, which is very unfortunate, who would've thought that signing (the wall) would result in getting exposed? The worst part is they were all unaware.

The entire thing was just an inappropriately placed mirror at an event that caused a number of female artists to suffer a fashion mishap.

No. 23087

File: 1543918669060.jpeg (97.88 KB, 600x900, 012D8F05-6601-4DD4-BFE8-429B77…)

>>23082
Unblurred it’s all sorts of fucked up

No. 23088

File: 1543918934414.jpeg (20.11 KB, 377x134, 28D38D9B-98C1-4B2A-B3DB-D9251B…)


No. 23089

>>23085
Sorry, I meant "the website must have gone live in Oct or Nov 2012" (not 2018)

No. 23090

>>23084
No Kaka, doing suggestive or sexy photo shoots doesn't make anyone a prostitute.

>>23087
>>23088
That's disgusting. I bet the stuff was aware but they didn't tell the models because they are perverts.

No. 23091

>>23090
it was definitely done on purpose because why put mirrors angled that way next to where
a) they will pose for the camera
b) get them to lean and sign the wall so they are stood front facing the mirror with cooch all out for extended amounts of time

No. 23092

>>23087

The sole reason why people think Taylor is the best looking jvlogger or was, is because she's the most normal looking white girl among the rest of ugly fuckers over there. Take Taylor to the UK, AUS or US she looks as mundane as any other white girl. She's average and skinny. That's it. I don't get why everyone fawns over her look. She isn't that pretty in my opinion. Just better looking than Dakota, Katie, ect

No. 23093

>>23092
Because "average and skinny" white girls actually do look good by most people's standard.

No. 23094

>>23092
That's the reason why she had to go to China/Japan for modelling. If you are average looking, white and skinny, you'll get the opportunity to work with big brands overseas but not in Europe or US. Hell, you can look like Himezawa can get a contract, that's how low the standards are.

No. 23095

>>23087
Her fillers were something else here, she almost looks like a different person. But this >>23091 is really fucked up.

No. 23096

>>23092
Taylor is hardly average, there's a reason people like her looks.

No. 23097

>>23096
Taylor is pretty, but without all the cutesy trendy stuff she's very "generic-pretty". She has a cute face but isn't really memorable.

No. 23098

>>23096
>>23092

*dif anon

Honestly, to each there own. I don't personally like her looks or body, but it's not worth debating because everyone has different preferences. Debating her looks will just result in the same outcome as the jaw debate that happened in Dakota's thread. ( shit storm/sperging )

No. 23099

File: 1543959890403.jpg (105.87 KB, 1366x768, whh.jpg)

okey but why does she look so weird lately. I get that she has fillers but I think also the blonde hair in combination with her make up looks so irritading. STOP it girl

No. 23100

File: 1543959921209.jpg (99.81 KB, 1366x768, ing.jpg)

>>23099
are the fillers deflating or?

No. 23101

>>23099
her lips lmao

No. 23102

>>23099
she never had fillers it was debunked a millennium ago from her hamster cheeks in hk candids but has been kept alive out of spite lol. she just photoshopped her face slimmer and so did ads.

No. 23103

>>23101
This was after a long day I believe, so her makeup gave up. That said, I wished she wouldn't overdraw her lips all the time, she looks much better natural. Also she's never getting rid of all those pimples on her chin if she keeps smothering them with makeup.

No. 23104

>>23099
She looks so washed out. Her hair looked way better with the gold highlights and lowlights. This oversaturated blondencolor is in style now but it just doesn't suit everyone.

>>23102
Lmao are you for real rn

No. 23105

>>23102
I remember she kept saying it was from weight gain and she wanted to loose it again so her cheeks would not protude anymore. Which I call bullshit. It was not like she gained 30 pounds, she was still very slim but her cheeks were massive. It would have made more sense if she told her viewers that she is allergic to something, because this lie would not have been so easy to debunk. We will see if her cheeks inflate again when she gets pregnant, because according to her logic: weight gain = fat cheeks

No. 23106

>>23102
I don't know anything about cheek fillers. However, I do recognize the odd mouth corners she has. I think she's had a small amount of filler to compensate for the beginning of marionette lines (a problem for people with certain face shapes & bone structure). This type of filler helps lift the mouth corner.

I've had it two times (I'm in my mid-20s - it is a genetic problem). The second time, the woman injected too much. It puffed out just how Taylor's mouth area looked around the time she cut her hair.
just one example: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bnuci4aHSa6/
You can see it in a lot of other videos and pictures. Because the filler dissolves, the puffiness goes away after awhile.

She obviously edits these pictures and smooths that area out more, but you can still see the puff where the filler might be. I used to think all that puffiness around her lower mouth/chin was her acne, but in this case, I think she's had this small amount of filler to lift her mouth corners.

I don't judge her for doing it. I did it because I got tired of people telling me I looked sad or angry.

No. 23107

Volkswagen deleted the commercial but I remember there was something strange about Taylor's jaw or chin and her face was also very bloated in the Japanese drama kodoku no gurume.

No. 23108

>>23102
>she never had fillers

That one anon who keeps insisting it was "debunked" without receipts is back.

Anyone who had fillers can recognize how they seem on the face, especially in odd angles because the change is immediate until it settles.

She definitely had a top up before coming to Toronto on the cheeks and around her nasolabial or marionette area. At her age and looking at her family's genetics there's no point in pretending she's natural.

No. 23109

>>23106
>>23108
With these type of fillers, wouldn't she have bruising? I know I had pretty bad bruising when I got mine done (not large, but just relatively dark). Do y'all think she just doesn't film for a week or so when she gets them done?

No. 23110

>>23103
Those "pimples" are mostly likely scars from the looks of it.

No. 23111

>>23109
If you're getting bruising it could be the way your doctor was doing it that one time or you're genetically inclined in that spot for bruising. Not everyone is the same.

No. 23112

>>23100
lmao she looks like Sere from this angle

No. 23113

Mommy anons might be able to tell me but what the fuck is the point of taking prenatal vitamins when she's "trying for a baby" in January?

No. 23114

>>23113
to build up solid levels of things like folic acid, several B vitamins (12, 7, maybe 6), vitamin D, and zinc; deficiencies in those vitamins have been linked to birth defects and many OB/GYNs suggest that people who are "trying" get a head start

No. 23115

>>23113
I was told to take them by my doctor for hair growth and healthier skin

No. 23116

File: 1543994446835.png (253.7 KB, 457x301, Screen Shot 2018-12-05 at 2.18…)

>>23113

Damn, they're moving fast lately with everything. I wonder if she's going to cash in on family vlogging. ( Honest to god hope not )



>>23102

Lol. Her face just naturally randomly swells or looks like she was stung by bees.

No. 23117

>>23116
Well the first 5 are obvious and all from same month long period more than 4 years ago. The last one gets posted and it's just a really bad angle because in the drama the main character is looking down at her and she's looking up with kind of a weird fisheye lense. If you look at other scenes from the same episode she looks less puffy.
Anyway, I'm really not sure why we are discussing her fillers again. Plus this thread stinks of Kiki.

No. 23118

File: 1543995289025.jpg (489.96 KB, 2980x1450, comparison_taylor.jpg.a2fdc62f…)

>>23109
No, the bruising is minor to non-existent as long as you aren't drinking excessively or taking NSAIDs. Taylor also wears full coverage foundation and concealer - she could cover a bruise if necessary.

People with her face shape are prone to getting these lines earlier than people with different face shapes, I think. But it's clear that this is probably not the only "upkeep" she is having done - it's just the only thing I know anything about personally.

I don't think anyone who gets fillers should be shamed for that (obviously kek). Taylor is going overboard, though - the Pocky commercial and the (pic related) ad… That's not just filler underneath her mouth corners, obviously

No. 23119

>>23106
>However, I do recognize the odd mouth corners she has.

she has always had them lol. the comparison pictures are literally available on previous threads with the same rehashed pictures debunked over and over. only for the same floridian autist to selfpost about her nonexistent fillers and pretend they were never debunked. consistently. for years. i'm not about to dig up shit from 2015 but they're in previous threads for anyone who wants to see.

No. 23120

>>23117

Point is that she did have fillers, and homegirls face shouldn't drastically puff out like that from bad angles or smiling. Even in the pocky video, she had moments where her face wasn't puffy.

anyways, I figured most assume this pocky video is lost :
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av1995594?from=search&seid=2051213643727023184

No. 23121

>>23120
It only puffed up once. It's possible to bloat or swell up from other shit including allergies. The last thing I would think of is fillers when looking at that picture. You can't claim she uses frequent fillers today while using a 4 year old picture with a face she no longer has.

No. 23122

>>23120
I'm not saying she didn't have fillers there. But she had toned them down a lot compared to the mess in 2014. The angle/lense is partially to blame for how weird it looks.

No. 23123

>>23121
I've noticed that first vlog after long plane rides she always look puffier. It goes pretty quickly though. Not sure what that's about. And I don't think she's getting her filler topped off at the airport.

No. 23124

>>23119
I was just sharing my personal opinion & experience about the puffiness around her mouth.

Anyway, I think it's interesting that the posts about menclub are getting buried in this crap.

No. 23125

>>23113
I really like Taylor but once she gets pregnant I’m probably going to stop watching her videos. Shit is boring and I don’t give a fuck about a baby. Sage

No. 23126

>>23113

You are supposed to take folic acid for at least one month before trying for a baby so you have high enough levels in your body to reduce the risks of neural tube defects. It's most important to take them before pregnancy and in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

No. 23127

>>23121
Wtf are you serious? Taylor would have mentioned her allergy instead of making up lies about weight gain. Anon mentioned here >>23105 that saying she has an allergy would have made more sense because you can't prove it and now you are saying that she had an allergy causing these fat cheeks???
Something is telling me that you are either Taylor or a retarded Taylor stan

No. 23128

>>23119
>2015
You do realise it's normal to get fillers done regularly, right? She could have started early, considering she has been modelling for a long time

No. 23129

>>23124
It's OK anon, the they'll always be here in the thread waiting for whoever wants a chuckle.

No. 23130

>>23123
Topping off a few days before a trip is just like getting a manicure before a trip and it seems she often does things with this routine. It takes even less time than a manicure, maybe 10 minutes to get done.

>>23124
Can a summary post about menclub be made? People seem to be in doubt still.

No. 23131

>>23113
she said in the video, that her doc recommended taking them thee month before trying or sth

No. 23132

File: 1544043071394.jpeg (115.24 KB, 505x1010, 95CAA648-6584-487E-8DBA-8BFBA2…)

she 100% has cheek fillers.
she probably got them originally to have a 'uber cute kawaii baby face' but now has them as an attempt to reverse the aging process/look younger.

In the pic attached, see how flat her entire under eye/cheek region is? That looks fine when you're young with plump skin but as you age your skin obviously begins to droop. That lack of volume there is a recipe for looking haggard af.

No. 23133

>>23121
The obvious answer is she had it done once, realized it looked horrible and never did it again.

it's not bulimia cheeks, that happens farther down in the face (see Yumi King), and weight gain wouldn't make ONLY her cheeks fatter without affecting her chin or any other parts of her face. You can see in these photos/videos that she still has bony wrists so if she did gain weight it certainly wasn't much, and not enough to affect her face this way.

WHen you've eliminated the other options, what's left must be the truth. She had fillers to try to make her face look more round and childlike, realized she looked stupid, and never did it again. The end.

No. 23134

>>23130
I was the anon who kind of triggered the recent interest in menclub and found the posts about her on their FB, including the announcement of her single status and upskirt ogling. I have a deadline to meet tonight but will be happy to write up a summary tomorrow.

No. 23135

>>23134
Her announcement of being single is so weird

No. 23136

>>23117
>in the drama

Wait, homegirl was in a drama? Like asian soap opera? Source?

Also: Her Toronto condo was posted on PULL. Is it doxxing to list the name of the apartment building? It's a huge ass building downtown, but they definitely got one of the nicest units

No. 23137

>>23136
yup she was in a drama but it's old milk. Just search for it on her channel

No. 23138

>>23136
Really? Those pulltards are the worst. Never post private information, that's illegal and dangerous.

No. 23139

I like Taylor and I'm happy she's doing well, but this video really reminds me of her

No. 23140

>>23138
They did not doxed her , it was just pictures of the unit which she herself showed already and the price , there wasn’t there any private information

No. 23141

>>23140
>posting where she lives isn't doxxing
fuck off pulltard.

No. 23142

>>23140
That's not what was posted…and you know it. Basically someone on PULL posted a a screenshot(that they have since removed) of a real estate listing that included the price and sell date and it was really easy to track her exact building and unit from it.
When it comes to Taylor, PULL a-logs so hard.

No. 23143

>>23125
Yeah She'll probably post less or leave her baby with a nanny like she does Rosie.

No. 23144

>>23140
Are you serious? Posting the building is enough to find out her exact location since her and Tom's last name are public. That's fcking dangerous and insane. Those pulltards are so obsessed. I bet the Monstrengas are posting there regularly since they tear Taylor down and praise Dakota for her ugly shoops.

No. 23145

>>23144
She is the dumb one. She’s the one who posted a video showing the house and you can obviously see the background outside the windows and find where she lives easily. But as usual, being the not-so-smart Taylor, it’s okay not to have privacy as long as she can show the whole world how big and expensive their house are.

You can also hear how annoyed Tom were in the car after they went for Christmas shopping vlog. She love to buy a lot of unnecessary things and obviously not the one who will have to pay for it. With everything she bought online (the boxes never stopped coming in her vlogs) I’m sure she never pays for anything and just spending his money carelessly. Cant you be any more spoiled bimbo Taytay? LOL girl.

No. 23146

>>23145
>You can also hear how annoyed Tom were in the car after they went for Christmas shopping
I noticed that too. She didn't even consider what he wanted for decorations next year and is only thinking about what she wants.

No. 23147

>>23145
Of course Taylor should have been more cautious but I read the posts on Pull and someone recognized the neighborhood and doxed it. That's not okay. I could have never guessed the building in my live since I don't come from this place. And if I even knew, I wouldn't have told the world about it. It's morally wrong to tell anyone's building/address because that could put the doxed person in danger. If you can't see the difference between right and wrong, then you should look for help honestly.

No. 23148

Found another clip from her over the top kawaii era. Was this for mensclub ? Its only 15 seconds long and not in English.

https://www.bilibili.com/video/av2022540?from=search&seid=12988889029574020813

No. 23149

>>23147
Sweetie, I’m not saying it’s right to post people’s address or buildings online, but be realistic, they won’t know it if she doesn’t show it all over her video at the first place. Out of all people, i think she’s the one who should know and understand how the online works and the bad outcomes if she do that. Don’t you think so?But still she showed it nonetheless, well you gotta show what you gotta show the world. Ka-ching!$$$. Who’s the one need helps now huh?

No. 23150

>>23149
I agree with you anon. As a public figure she should know the risk of putting that kind of stuff online..you can’t blame anyone else, it’s her fault. She should know how crazy people online are.

>>23147
The anon didn’t even say what they did was right…She was just stating the fact that it is Taylor’s fault,which is true..she is the one who needs help because she can’t go a day without flaunting how rich they are and how much money they have (when it is not even HER money, how embarrassing) and she’s the one who makes it not safe from online people….

No. 23151

>>23149
>>23150

Diff anon.

I agree to a certain extent. Most youtuber's homes get exposed eventually anyways because there will always be that one crazy fan/hater that'll spend hours looking. Maybe Taylor just doesn't care anymore if people look into her because all her info is basically already out there. She's got what she wanted and that's marriage to a rich man. Maybe she's going to just on the flexing trend late, and start acting like Alissa Violet ( retarded and spoiled ).

No. 23152

>>23148
Is that Cantonese? So creepy.

https://www.bilibili.com/video/av4757615/?spm_id_from=333.788.videocard.0
The editing is so much better in these
older videos. When did Elbowsan stop paying for all of that? Her voice and tone are also different, like a little girl's.

No. 23153

>>23149
>sweetie
go jump off a bridge

No. 23154

Do you bitches mind saging so this doesn’t get autosaged again? Only unsage if you have new info

Anyways, the men’s club thing doesn’t seem too bad. It’s not like it’s an Ashley Madison

No. 23155

>>23145
honestly, that´s one reason why I watch her though. She lives this bubbled careless life of a spoiled bimbo. It´s entertaingin in my eyes

No. 23156

>>23152
do ypu guys see how shes lifting he brows to open he eyes?? He forehead should be wrinkly no? I´m sure she got bodox. Even nowadays.
I really wanna know why she didn´t get lip injections when she was so crazy about Kylie and is overdrawing he lips every day

No. 23157

File: 1544131337605.png (154.13 KB, 356x294, Screen Shot 2018-12-06 at 4.19…)

>>23156

I think because she likes her heart-shaped lips which might be hard to maintain with fillers. Also, lip fillers are even more obvious and noticeable than cheek fillers are. Every youtuber with them has bulging anus lips or you can see them protruding from the side profile.

She made the smart decision not to.

No. 23158

>>23148
Looked exactly like one of Koot's videos at first, damn.

>>23156
Botox costs less than a takeout lunch from Kupfert and Kim, she's had it all around the eye area and forehead for years at this point.

>>23134
Looking forward to it anon.

No. 23159

>>23158
Looks nothing like Kooters videos. Kooter uses After Effects so she never moves like a freaking muppet. This video in particular was so great that I think Taylor had a cutter since she doesn't seem to be the brightest. Kota is just too lazy make such a video and poor to have a cutter

No. 23160

>>23151
Agreed. The issue is YouTubers don't live in a bubble. Their audience is all around them and sometimes in the millions. I used to live under the hill where Ryan Higa's new house was, and every time I went to the store I saw it. Eventually, I started noticing the cross streets in the background of videos and it made me feel like a total creep… but I just live nearby.

I feel like Taylor in particular just would not care. I mean Tom can just pay for a new place any way, right?

No. 23161

>>23160
An apartment like this is way more secure than a house anyway, they have security and doormen and stuff. Remember when someone tried to break into her old house in Japan?

No. 23162

still cuter than dakota :)(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 23163

The toilets are all clogged because "of the pipes" so Elbowsan and Taylor put a bunch of home remedies down the toilet (baking soda + vinegar, coke + detergent in the tank, plunger) but nothing works.
Oh and Bibi does a short interview saying she regrets leaving Japan or something.

No. 23164

>>23132
Wow, that looks weird.

No. 23165

>>23163
all i can see is plastic

No. 23166

>>23163
Her hair looks so flat and washed out like this, like she's a halfass Ppppy cosplayer or smth.

No. 23167

what is her fascination with poop now and why do you have to include it in a fucking vlog. The moment when she looked at the toilet and said "what did I eat???" I puked in my mouth ffs

No. 23168

>>23152
She looks so skinny in this one. Like I know she's a model but geez.
>>23156
Probably because it changes the face too obviously.

No. 23169

>>23163
Seeing how careless they are about putting random shit in the toilet is making me worry. I get that it's "hacks" but she doesn't seem too far off from mixing potentially dangerous cleaning supplies

No. 23170

I don't want her address but I am curious at to how much the apartment cost. Can an anon post the price or just an approximate?

No. 23171

>>23170
I don’t actually know specifically, but based on the location and size? Definitely above $1mill, probably closer to $3-4mill.

No. 23172

>>23171
That is insane. Tom is clearly loaded but two multi-million dollar apartments and endless shopping? Why does she even bother with YouTube? She is in the prime position to actually have those 4 kids she wants and be a present stay at home mum providing the best life possible for her kids. But she won't as long as there is endless household shit to buy and YouTuve attention

No. 23173

>>23167

Why are you shocked? Taylor talks about her period blood, pimples and dirty habits, not that crazy for her to show and talk about her shit.


>>23172

Because she's an attention whore and wants fame, anon.

No. 23174

>>23150
>was just stating the fact that it is Taylor’s fault

Not to WK but: Nice victim-blaming. If she didn't want us to find her house she shouldn't have posted a video with visible windows in it!!

Honestly the bitches at PULL or here are not the problem. But I guarantee she had stalkers-every woman online has. She's incredibly visible. Notice she never shows chest or cleavage in videos/photos. My guess is to try and deter creeps. If any creep finds her house, both her and any future toddlers are in danger. Doxxing is inexcusable.

No. 23175

>>23174
you haven't watched her videos or looked at pictures from the past year then. her wedding dress video was a whole lot of boobs

No. 23176

>>23175
That was the only one, and presumably a creep's fantasy is not a woman in a wedding dress. She also seemed awkward about it even though it looked pretty, and then got married in a suit, so.

Also remember to put sage in the email field.

No. 23177

>>23175
It wasn't the only one, but I'm not going to make a list for you.

No. 23178

>>23177
Haha, do it. It's just something I've noticed, she never wears revealing clothes. I would say it was from learned experience. There's no doubt someone who easily nets 200,000 views per video has a few weirdos after her.

No. 23179

>>23163
These vlogmas videos from Tay are becoming more and more boring by the day. Bii looks awful.

No. 23180

>>23179
Agreed. That whole baby fever is so boring. And Bii looks like a troon

No. 23181

>>23179
Thumbnail is like two women who could look great but botched their faces.

No. 23182

>>23163
Surprised Bii even agreed to film with Taylor. Hasn't she been super depressed and down about her life lately? Are they even friends?

No. 23183

After reading the filler sperging above, I can notice the cheek filler more. One side is more swollen than the other. It's subtle though. I am the same age as her and had REALLY full cheeks in my early twenties, hers are currently fuller than mine. I got cheekbones now.

No. 23184

>>23174
As someone from the area, she shows too much in her videos. You can see signs of streets and the view of iconic sceneries make it clear the area she lives.

For those who care, she is in a condo near the core of Toronto so it is pretty pricey and funnily it’s known for being bought by asians who drive the market up and rarely live in these places. It’s a big issue for the city because housing prices are bad and no one seems to be in the condos that exist. Living in the core is not really the ideal for starting a family but I think they can’t afford the much pricier nice houses that are a bit in the suburbs.

No. 23185

>>23118
I'm no stan but the right to me doesn't look like fillers, it looks like swelling/moon face from taking corticosteroids or synthetic cortisols. They are often prescribed to people post-surgery, so maybe she had some sort of work done, or a really bad infection where she had to take them otherwise.

But I really doubt either way that they are fillers because it would be like three syringes worth per cheek, to get them that big. She's rich so I don't doubt that she gets fillers (considering her age) but I don't think that the puffy cheeks was her going overboard, probably due to something else.

No. 23186

>>23185
Corticosteroids or synthetic cortisols don't let your cheeks swell. She would have to take a massive amount of cortisol and then her whole body would swell up and not only her cheeks kek. But you you could be partly right. I think she got fillers and she got an allergic reaction where she got the injections.

No. 23187

>>23179
>>23180
OT:
I was shocked when I saw the thumbnail. I like Bii but in comparison to Taylor she looks like an orange man with fake lips and a wig. I am sorry. Bii please leave the fcking fillers alone and stop fake tanning! Even though she is younger than Taylor, she looks about 10 years older than her.

>>23182
Why would she say no to filming with Taylor? She has nearly 1 Million subs which means probably more views/subs for Bii as it is cross-promotion.

No. 23188

File: 1544313495998.jpg (Spoiler Image,148.78 KB, 1200x1057, example.jpg)

>>23186
It is a common side effect.
Here is an example from someone on twitter: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3hw9eJWIAY9nbU.jpg

No. 23189

>>23087
next time she says she's shy and introverted this picture will come to mind

No. 23190

File: 1544315889062.jpg (40.42 KB, 481x286, bug.jpg)

>>23152
the lenses and the agyosal shits and the brows up fucking expression she looks like a damn alien

No. 23191

>>23189
Why? She always looks uncomfortable at events including that one. Look how stiff she is. The reflection thing isn't her fault.

No. 23192

>>23191
you taytay stans are something else. She clearly knew the mirror was there and still posed for the picture, that's why.

No. 23193

>>23192
Not a stan. I just think it's ridiculous to assume something like that. Especially since there were lots of other people caught up in it too. It seems like it wasn't obvious in person.

No. 23194

>>23192
That's a bit of a reach anon.

Look at how many people signed the wall:
>>23082
Every single one of them wearing a skirt would've had the same issue as Taylor, you think they all did it for attention too? Many of the people who accidentally got upskirted at that event were legitimately famous people who definitely didn't need it.

The angle of the mirror is like the angled mirrors at shoe stores. Most likely when you're beside it, you just see your own feet and its only from a distance you can see up their skirt.

No. 23195

>>23194
I thought people knew what was going on. My bad, I guess.

No. 23196

>>23188
This girls face is completely swollen. Look at her eyes, cheeks, lips, even her nose looks a bit swollen. Taylors face on the other hand had just swollen cheeks which proves that she had an reaction against the fillers. Are you really that naive? Taylor said that she gained weight and therefore her cheeks got big which is a lie. She would have told us if she had an allergic reaction. And if she had an operation than she would have told us too as her latest operation regarding her cyst. I am pretty sure she got some cortisols and other medication but her cheeks were alright.

No. 23197

phew smells like kiki in here

No. 23198

Man, why is it considered too wild and crazy to believe that Taylor had fillers when her face clearly shows round swelling only in the cheeks that lasted a long as time.>>744052

Unless she broke a facial bone or shaved her jaw the swelling shouldn't last months/year. If anons want to take a look at wild over the top tin foiling, then go look at Kota's thread being full of " she works for the Yakuza" " she's sleeping with her manager at the age of 16/17" "she has a sugar daddy". Like I'm no Kota stan, but that to me is more wild and unbelievable than some rich girl obsessed with looking young getting fillers.

No. 23199

>>23198
Aside from the yakuza stuff-which is just ten kinds of stupid and based off inacurate information to boot- I don't think any of the other stuff is that far off the mark. I think that Taylor had terribad fillers in 2014 and continues to get slightly less bad ones to this day. I also believe that Kota has had someone or several someones pulling strings for her since about 2013. I'm guessing it started with someone from Bravo because they acted really really shady when it came to her career. After that, probably someone in entertainment or media.

No. 23200

Just watched the old video "My Mom meets Sharla", and her nose looks much bigger than now? Her "old" nose is small too but the current one is extra small. She has cheek fillers and lenses in the old video so both things would negate visible nose size, but it still looks larger. >>23185
I agree it looks a bit like a reaction to something/to the injection itself.

No. 23201

>>23200
She used to try to make her face look much smaller back then so all of her features looked bigger on her face. Since she seems to be going for a western look now, she doesn't seem to care about having a small face anymore. So now, her whole face looks bigger and fuller.

No. 23202

Her new vlog was so boring I didn’t even get the point?? Buying stuff again?

No. 23203

>>23201

Didn't she use some sort of software to shrink her features? I remember her Rosie goes to Japan video and her face being sooo wiggly/weird looking in it. I feel like she did use to use aftereffects on her OTT dolly videos, cause her face has just never looked as petite and slim.

No. 23204

>>23199
How do you think a chubby, bald and mediocre looking girl like Kota got all of her jobs? You're stupid and delusional. All of Japans agencies are under control of the Yakuza. This is a fact. But noooo precious dolly alien baby Kota got her jobs all on her own ~uwuu. Of course she has no direct connection to the Yakuza but her agency does for sure.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-yakuza-are-running-japans-hollywood

No. 23205

>>23204

Why would a gang with such power give little to any shit about a balding, poor, average, rude and unlikeable twat ? What in the world would they get in return, nothing!! There are hundreds of beyond your imagination Russian models in Japan that look 10 billion times better than both Kota and Taylor. Why would they choose Kota to help or promote?


All her jobs had one thing in common, that was that they didn't introduce her by name but rather by " human Barbie". She got her jobs by building connections and because she went viral. Like every fucking living doll did. If she was so important and connected to the gangs why have her jobs been dried up since late 2015? You dear, sound very flustered and assblasted.

No. 23206

>>23205
>She got her jobs by building connections and because she went viral.
No. She didn't get her jobs from the yakuza but someone was definitely getting her jobs pre-popteen era and now post popteen. The first jobs she got were from going viral, but the ones that came after in 2013 came via dubious means.
>All her jobs had one thing in common, that was that they didn't introduce her by name
A lot of her jobs introduced her by name?

>>23202
It was really boring. One thing that struck me is that they both spend money so carelessly. It's their choice I guess (especially Tom) but I can't say I wasn't a little taken aback by him going to the store for nose spray and coming out with over $600 of stuff. I mean even if you're wealthy that seems like conspicuous consumption. The furnishings I understand more but still , you don't need to have every knick-knack in place from the beginning.
>>23203
She definitely did. That Rosie video is nightmare fuel. After that weird period, she seemed to have found more of a balance. Still she used programs the different lenses to make her face seem smaller.

No. 23207

>>23205
You serious? Of course she would give sexual favours. Kota is not ugly but mediciore. There's probably one Yakuza who likes gaijin. Tastes are different. Why would these pretty Russian girls stay in Japan and suck Yakuza dick when they can have a career in New York or Paris? Kota has no other choice in comparison. She would do anything to stay in Japan. Even someone as tall and pretty as Taylor needed a powerful person who got her jobs. And this was Elbow San with his connections.

No. 23208

>>23207
Kota did not get her jobs through yakuza connections. She got them because her booker played fast and loose with the truth while promoting her. After Popteen and her year as a TV tarento, whatever she gets now is from the connection she made during that time, especially Popteen. And maybe the yakuza have some control over her talent agency but they have bigger fish to fry than some basic token gaijin.

Tom did not get Taylor jobs. He doesn't have that kind of pull. He has a lot of money from his web platforms but that's not the kind of thing that would get Taylor booked her in fashion. She was also working the most between 2009-2012 way before she even knew Tom. And she worked a lot. Lots of fashion/beauty editorial, campaigns, and catalogue. When she younger especially, she had a good look for it. Her face/figure was very versatile. Shame she threw it away.

No. 23209

>>23208
So because you are saying that isn't true, everybody has to change their opinions? Who are you? God? At least I have based my opinion on reports who expose the wrong-doings of agencies and the media. There are several media outlets writing about the same stuff that the enteratinment industry of Japan is under the control of the Yakuza. Do you have proofs that this isn't true? Are you really this blinded? The people who are writing about this stuff are journalists who are educated, have studied journalism and did a lot of research on this topic. And then you, a random farmer comes along and says everything is untrue because you said so. Think about it: Kota isn't in her prime anymore. She is chubby and bald and there are hundreds of young and pretty models in Japan right now. So who gets the job for Google? Logically one of the young and pretty models. But that's not the case at all. Big ol' bald Kota gets the job. There is definetely someone helping her out and this person is very powerful. Probably a person with Yakuza connections. And when you think that Kota is a small fish and no Yakuza is actually interested: read the other threads here. There are many gaijins who are modelling, waitressing and whatever but they are in certain circles.

And regarding Taylor. I am not talking about her old self in Hong Kong. She was a successful model on her own right at that time. I am talking about her new self in Japan when she wanted everyone to believe she is a girl boss. Tom did help her out for sure.

No. 23210

>>23209
Oh ffs, fine maybe she is using yakuza connections now. I don't know. I just mean that she didn't start that way. Back in the day it was definitely Hiroshi from Bravo pulling every trick he had in order to make her into a star. If there are yakuza connections she probably made them no early than 2015 when she was working as a geinojin.

>I am talking about her new self in Japan when she wanted everyone to believe she is a girl boss. Tom did help her out for sure.

Even with that, he wasn't getting her jobs in fashion. He didn't get her parts in dramas. He doesn't have that kind of influence. He did use his money however to help her make a name for herself online of course and pretty much all of her work in Japan came from that. So in that way he did help her get jobs, I guess. But directly having the kind of connections whoever's backing Kota obviously has, not so much.
In conclusion it's seems:
Taylor has (Tom's) money and media which helped promote her. The fame she achieved helped get her jobs in Japan.
Kota doesn't have money but she does have someone high enough up that basically can hand her things like Fit's (should have been a major stepping stone for her), Babyfang, Rakuten collab, and now a google cm.

No. 23211

>>23210
We also speculated that Kota didn't have Yakuza connections at the beginning of her career since she didn't have much jobs. It probably started when she got Candy Doll and Popteen but of course we don't know exactly.

I agree Taylor benefited from Tom's money and got the TV role and some other fashion jobs through her agency/castings and not through Tom but I am still not convinced that she got all of her jobs in Japan on her own because apparently he has a beauty company and some anon here once pointed out that Taylor indeed worked for his company a few times. But I can't find the post at the moment..

No. 23212

This constant yakuza Kota talk is coming off like an effort to derail the discussion. Why not discuss the 13 year old swimsuit model recently featured on MC or are we still pretending Taylor's husband's website is just a Chinese version of Maxim?

>>23210
He seems to have a lot of connections to the Japanese entertainment industry if you look at the Japanese women who've done exclusive video or photo shoots for his company. Of course, they're mostly porn stars, gravure models, and c-list celebrities, but Taylor's modeling jobs and TV drama appearances in Japan weren't exactly top level work, either. Elbowsan is also quite connected to the car ad industry through his job.

No. 23213

>>23211
>It probably started when she got Candy Doll and Popteen but of course we don't know exactly.
I'd go about a year later than that. I remember that she went to some Halloween party in 2015, and some weird Japanese anon who talked a lot about the yakuza connections of models and idols mentioned that all of the talento in the photos with her had yakuza connections and so did she.

>he has a beauty company and some anon here once pointed out that Taylor indeed worked for his company a few times

Absolutely true. The company is Beauty Exchange and any time that Taylor did any work for them, it was through him. But since she probably didn't get paid for it, I'm guessing they saw it as mutually beneficial. HK based Beauty Exchange was promoted by Japan based Taylor on her social media. Beauty Exchange gave Taylor the illusion of being in demand and busy.

No. 23214

>>23213

>>I remember that she went to some Halloween party in 2015, and some weird Japanese anon who talked a lot about the yakuza connections of models and idols mentioned that all of the talento in the photos with her had yakuza connections and so did she.


That's interesting. I am going to write something in the Kota thread because we are derailling the thread like anon said >>23212

No. 23215

Can you please talk about Kota on her own thread

No. 23216

>>23215

Read >>23214 you retard and learn to sage

No. 23217

>Taylor wants to put the toaster in the cupboard after every use instead of leaving it on the table

No. 23218

>>23217
>>Taylor wants to put the toaster in the cupboard after every use instead of leaving it on the table
How exciting. I'm sure that no one who watches it will be able to remain seated. She should have cut that entire part.
It's weird but I actually prefer this mess she created to her normal makeup. It's clumsy af but the glossy lip, rosy cheeks, and heavier eye makeup suit her better than her everyday Kylie Jenner lipkit look. Not saying this should be worn out or seen by anyone except her bathroom mirror, but there are aspects of it that work.
It definitely makes her look softer.

No. 23219

>>23217
I absolutely cannot stand her vlogmas intro this year. It looks like a 12 year old drew it.

No. 23220

File: 1544443343170.jpg (100.59 KB, 1080x621, Screenshot_20181210-130111_1.j…)

>>23219
The artist is Jacky Files who studied at the institute of the Arts in California. Her art is pretty amateurish/childish but if that's Taylor's taste…ok

No. 23221

>>23220
wow I thought it was made by a teenage fan, this is embarassing.

No. 23222

>>23218
I agree, despite how this is obviously a crazy look just for the video, parts of it show how much she's failing to bring out her good features normally; her makeup at her wedding as well was so much better than the blank-looking face with weird fish lips that she does daily.

No. 23223

>>23220
Her other work isn't like this imo.
It's sweet, it doesn't need to be anything fancy for an intro.

No. 23224

>>23223
90% of her Instafeed is like that. The other 10% are from her classes which aren't that great either. She's currently looking for some clients to do some graphics and animations and if she is coming up with this ugly childish mess of an animation for Taylor, who happens to be a big Youtuber and gives her a lot of exposure, then she is definitely a very bad artist. What would she animate for an unknown Youtuber for example? The outcome would be worse probably. If I would have the opportunity to animate for a big Youtuber than I wouldn't come up with this mess. Whatever. She seems to be proud of her '~art'.

No. 23225

>>23223
It is. I just went through her twitter and her art is just bad (especially for someone who supposedly studied Arts).

No. 23226

>>23220
Wew, I drew like this during middle school. This is supposed to be a professional? How much was she paid for this?

No. 23227

File: 1544467914059.png (777.26 KB, 720x919, Art.png)

>>23224
I like the Taylor intro, but I would say it's her best work after seeing her Insta
>Calarts

How?

No. 23228

File: 1544468991229.jpg (329.79 KB, 1582x2048, lol.jpg)

>>23227
Her art hasn't improved much since her childhood

No. 23229

>>23228
um do y'all wanna discuss this somewhere else?

No. 23230

>>23229
I mean it's more relevant than discussing Kota and the Yakuza.

No. 23231

File: 1544481469331.jpg (61.6 KB, 644x741, resume.jpg)

>>23229
It's about Taylors intro, so it's kinda relevant to this thread.

This girl is supposed to be a professional and Taylor hired her. I somehow have the feeling that either Calarts accepts every minimally talented ~artist or she probably lied about her resume. Apparently she was a trainee at South Park. Hmmm…who wants to talk about her in the artists thread because we are derailling? She seems to be a catfish and Taylor fell for her kek

No. 23232

>>23220
Her drawing/animation is shit. Pretty simple that a highschool student can make.Taylor sometimes has poor taste in design. Look at those taytortot shirts and leggings she sold. Even the last vlogmas intro was a creepy 3d animation. I wonder how Taylor found this girls work.

No. 23233

>>23220
Rosie has a broken leg, the floor appears to be slanted and nothing is on the same plane, Tom has one three-fingered hand, the window is crooked, Taylor is holding her camera in a clenched fist while the other hand is some kind of witch claw with stump fingers, the coloring is lazy and there's absolutely no shading. I wonder how much she paid for this.

No. 23234

>>23217
This would be cute if it wasn't for the anus lips.

No. 23235

>>23234
lmao anus lips

No. 23236

>>23231
Tbh CalArts isn't shit these days. Most popular artists out of there seem to be aiming for the lazy basic character animation style these days… that's what's trendy rn.

No. 23237

>>23231
Tbh CalArts isn't shit these days. Most popular artists out of there seem to be aiming for the lazy basic character animation style… that's what's trendy rn.

No. 23238

>>23231
Tbh CalArts isn't shit these days. Most popular artists out of there seem to be aiming for the lazy basic character animation style… that's what's trendy rn.

No. 23239

File: 1544555023808.png (68.55 KB, 613x695, ss.PNG)

So, someone asked Tom about one of the sus Mens Club posts on his Instagram and he replied.

It's on this pic:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BrQJMWbB0Xa/

Link from the post:
https://menclub.hk/mobile/article/article.php?cat=girls&aid=18274

I can't read Chinese so can't confirm what it says either way.

No. 23240

>>23239
That cow tipper is so fucking cringe, if they’re so upset about girls who are young looking adult they shouldn’t be on fucking insta. The hypocrisy is huge

No. 23241

>>23240
Cow tippers are cringe but lets not fucking act like he doesnt use models who by all other standards than HK break age of consent laws (and from what i saw upthread some of the models are underage even for the HK laws)
You seem more bothered about someone not liking underage models than you do the actual cow tipping lmao

No. 23242

>>23239
>kpopidol_culturalappropriation
kek
the mens club stuff is weird but if that's been his business for years then he's not going to change it because a kpop account posts a public comment about it being wrong

No. 23243

>>23241
It's hard tbh because it's not like Menclub is photographing the girls itself. Pretty much they just find pretty girls and than raid google images plus social media and write cliche Maxim-esque blurb. It's still gross but the line is a bit blurrier. This especially seems to be true if the girl in question is a public figure whose pictures are readily available.

No. 23244

So first everyone freaks out about MC and now it’s no big deal or?? Make up your mind people

No. 23245

>>23243
Still, a Playboy tier website featuring an article about a girl born in 2005 is gross as fuck.
>inb4 "B-But they talk about other things on MC, like cars!!!"
It's still a website targeted to adult men. Even if MC was only about cars, even if we ignore the escort service and the underage section, why in the world would an adult man be interested in an article about a child model? Even without referring to her body in the article.
It's creepy and sketchy as hell and it's dumb to pretend otherwise.

>>23244
It is a big deal. It's just that some Taylor stan keeps trying to sweep it under the rug.

No. 23246

>>23239
Google translate is hilariously bad, but here's a translation of some of the comments on the page:

Title of the post is "I don’t want to move my hands 13 years old Model Jemima Robinson"

"Wrong, it’s a fall for you. The 18-year-old is a beautiful girl. It’s actually from Jemima Robinson, who was born in Australia. The canal was born in 2005. It’s only 13 years old this year, even the machine shop has not entered. However, it has already been a well-known swimsuit model, although the figure is gimmick (you want to order at the age of 13), but the victory in the proportion of people is good, still pleasing to the eye!"

"I thought that Li Yun’s 15-year-old swimsuit photo was caught and stunned. According to Jemima’s 13-year-old swimsuit, the photo was degraded and embarrassing! Is it true that the national conditions are the same, the times are the same, and the people are different?"

Even with bad translation, these comments are creepy. NO one shoud be commenting on how the "body proportion" of 13-year-olds is "pleasing to the eye," or that they were "caught and stunned" by a 15-year-old's swimsuit photo but this 13-year-old looks better.

No. 23247

>>23239
Someone should ask him about the "Schoolgirls we fxxed" and "Under 18!" articles and creepy videos filmed exclusively for his company. At least Elbow's stans can now stop pretending he doesn't know about the content of his site.

No. 23248

>>23241
if you're going to cow tip at least have a better smoking gun than "hurr durr you have young looking girls on your site" vs "you promote escorts"

one makes you look like a really fucking retarded sjw moralist

No. 23249

One of the most famous members of AKB48 Tomomi Itano was also in an exclusive MC video and interview in 2016 which confirms Elbowsan has some great connections to the Japanese entertainment industry.

No. 23250

>>23245
Please post a link to the underage section. I can't find it on the site.

No. 23251

File: 1544573496688.png (452.58 KB, 602x791, Dec4.png)

I'm going to do my best to summarize the situation with Menclub.hk (also known on the web as Menclubhk and simply Menclub).

>>22883 I made this post in disgust at people talking about elbowsan's "self-made" career. As far as I know, Taylor's previous work for Menclub has never been a secret, but it wasn't clear until recently that Tom Lip owned the site.

>>23085 Tom claims Menclub is only 5 years old, but it's actually 6 years old. archive.org crawled the site in 2012. Most of the early hits say "coming soon," but between Oct and Nov 2012, the site went live. Girls were immediately a section of the site.

At this time, Taylor may have already been working for Beauty Exchange, one of Tom's other sites. There's a post on his FB site dated Dec 16, 2012, where he says "BE girls rock" - there's a thumbnail of a now-deleted Taylor video (the Cinderella one) included in the screenshot.

But Tom MIGHT have asked Taylor to work for menclub first, as he introduces her to Menclub on December 4, 2012 (see attached screenshot). The Menclub site is only 2 months old (tops) at this point. She was part of the original promotion for the site, which in turn promoted her social media and website.

On February 14, 2013, Taylor announces to Apple Daily that she is single, and the online magazine prints an article about it. This is promoted on the same day by Menclub.hk (on their website and on their FB page). Menclub asks their audience if they have the balls to date Taylor.

Menclub continues to promote Taylor with somewhat salacious posts:
>>22921
https://www.facebook.com/menclub.hk/photos/a.153530161435047/497297700391623/?type=3&theater (showing Taylor's upskirt photos to their audience)

Taylor did at least three videos for Menclub. One can still be found (the robotic Happy Chinese New Year one):

The other two are:
a Christmas greeting (can't find it)
an interview (https://prettyuglylittleliar.net/uploads/monthly_2018_11/Screen_Shot_2018-11-24_at_2.38.51_PM.png.45191aee95e559b224e6d57834cb9a41.png)

I remember other content, but it seems to be deleted now. Many things were removed after she announced that she had a boyfriend.

Menclub itself seems to be a bit like Maxim, but people are upset about it because girls under 16 appear on the site. There's an entire section of "under 18" content. Recently Jasmine Hendricks, a 13yo model, was featured in a bikini in their "girls" section, and her body was discussed (no matter what Tom says, it was actually mentioned in the text). Menclub seems to exist primarily to ogle girls, but yes, there are other sections about cars and liquor, just like Playboy has some articles.

There are allegations that the private area of Menclub hides an escort or sugaring service, as private members must provide personal information, including their salary, in order to gain entry. None of this has been proven, however.

Someone cow-tipped and confronted Tom on Instagram. He has posted a pretty stunningly obtuse defense of his company's behavior, and subtly threatened the poster for making slanderous allegations against his company. All of the posts by this cowtipper have been deleted, and only Tom's defense now remains.

Here's the screenshot of his post alleging that the cowtipper is saying false things that will have "serious consequences": https://prettyuglylittleliar.net/uploads/monthly_2018_12/Screenshot_20181211-144526_(1)_-_Copy.jpg.dc1e3561a5bf5cd3aac7a1c6b4728ade.jpg
Whether or not cowtipping is condoned, the threat is pretty funny.

I think that's it for now.

No. 23252

>>23251
I forgot to mention that there are other dodgy posts about Taylor left on the Menclub FB site. I don't think it's necessary to link them all. The comments are often sexual.

Taylor surely did not mind this type of attention, as her Menclub interview was promoted by her on her FB site with a wink kaomoji. She also had tweeted about her interviews and greetings / videos. These were deleted a year or two ago.

No. 23253

>>23251
Here is the Chinese New Year video (it was originally for menclub): https://www.bilibili.com/video/av2022540?spm_id_from=333.338.b_5f5f626f667169.8

No. 23254

>>23253
How do you know it was originally for menclub?

No. 23255

>>23251
….. Kiki?

No. 23256

>>23251
Great write up anon.
Just to let you, Beauty Exchange seems to predate Menclub by a several month. Her Beauty Exchange video was a Sailor Moon hair tutorial posted in September.

No. 23257

>>23256
This one.

No. 23258

>>23254
I can't prove it at this point. I'll try to find some trace of the link to menclub, though.
>>23255
Really? I think I was pretty objective about what I found. People wanted a summary post, so I wrote it up.
>>23257
Thanks anon, I suspected she worked for BE first and just didn't bother to confirm it.

No. 23259

Cows on this site always had a soft spot for Taylor, so any criticism or bad thing about her is always immediately shot down, no matter how bad it is … just not to burst the bubble of the innocent gullible little tylor.
For sure somebody will call me bitter for this comment, I’m not bitter I’m just disgusted by all this

No. 23260

>>23259
>not knowing correct use of "cow"
>not saging worthless opinion
fuck off, newfag

No. 23261

>>23251
Just FYI, what Tom meant was that the accusation they were making about him (posting indecent images of minors on his website) could have serious consequences FOR HIM if people believe it. He isn't threatening the poster. I know his English is bad but come on, let's not willfully misinterpret him because it fits our agenda.

No. 23262

>>23248
I was thinking earlier about the escort thing.
Elbow earns at least $10k a month, based on the apparent price of his new house and the frivolous spending (whoops I just got a Switch and some gaming gear while I was looking for nose spray)

How does he earn money? Does he get a cut of each escort introduction, or is the membership price so high? Can anyone figure out any part of his business that clearly makes money other than that? Ad sales on menclub? The beauty business? I haven't done much research other than looking at the website, I would love if it wasn't mainly for escorting or potentially naked photoshoots of teen models in the "member section"

No. 23263

>>23262

Btw not trying to imply anything illegal was going on, I'm sure everything is legal. It's just Shady to fund you and your wife's lifestyle off the back of other women/potential sugaring/unknown.

We need a rich Chinese man to join MenClub and report back.

No. 23264

>>23262
>>23263
However he earns money via MenClub, you're aware that he has other businesses and assets, right? And likely has stocks, probably invests in BTC, and other shit that funds their lifestyle.

Everyone's so hard up on MenClub like it's funding Taylor 100%.

No. 23265

>>23251
I messed up the name of the 13yo bikini model. It's Jemima Robinson.
>>23261
Oh, then i honestly misunderstood him. That post is basically written in dogespeak and probably represents his actual level of English. "u r doing a serious wrong and misleading accuse"

Also smooth of him to deny the presence of underage girls on his site. Just a couple examples:
https://menclub.hk/mobile/article/article.php?cat=girls&aid=5507
https://www.menclub.hk/mobile/article/article.php?cat=n&aid=17871
Correct me if I am wrong, but I didn't see a dedicated section for underage girls. Just posts about underage girls and their nearly nude pictures sprinkled in the "Girls" section.

There are high school students profiled on there, as >>22899 and other posts here mentioned.

No. 23266

>>23264
I think people find it amusing that wholesome Taylor who would never pose in a bikini (wrong) would be with a guy pushing this kind of content under the slogan 'be a better man.' She had 0 problem being associated with sleaze and winking about her single status when it benefited her. Maybe she could ask elbowsan to make his "girls" page more inclusive. omg what about trans models or squeal drag queens?! Or omg omg what about women old enough to vote

No. 23267

Exclusive MC video of 17 year old high schooler.

The video by itself isn't too creepy until you remember that most of their videos of women are of porn actresses and lingerie models, and the video title makes a point to say she's just 17 years old.

No. 23268

>>23266
I think she is so materialistic she wouldn't care how he earned his money. I didn't think he was funding her until the last few weeks of content when it became $very $obvious the spending exceeded her Youtube income.

>>23264

Pretty much what I was asking; if anyone had any leads on alternate sources. It's hard to match the wholesome taylor image up with that money source. Elbow seems like an OK guy so all signs point to it not being the 100% source of money, but it's still, eh. Uncomfortable.

No. 23269

>>23267
As the CEO, does Elbow-san approve all of this content or is he an absent partner? How do we know he's the one OK-ing the underaged girls?

The CEO of my business doesn't have her hands in the day-to-day aspects of our company nor does she overlook everything.

No. 23270

File: 1544583938658.jpg (45.69 KB, 788x556, 458484844.JPG)

>>23265
https://menclub.hk/mobile/article/article.php?cat=girls&aid=5507
She wasn't underage. She's just one of the those nymphet bloggers.
https://lvangel69.tumblr.com/
>>23269
We don't. Since he runs 3 or 4 businesses, it's likely he doesn't, but he should still take responsibility for it imo. Issue a statement. Stop posting girls younger than 18 and remove previously posted underage content. And most of all, address everything head on, because at the moment this is spiraling out of control with speculation.

No. 23271

File: 1544586005985.png (18.34 KB, 554x169, ss.PNG)

>>23262
Once you have a decent amount of money, money makes money on its own through investments. He also owns many businesses (4 or 5? They did say how many in a video at some point) and he's apparently started and sold some too, so its not like he is relying solely on MensClub to fund their lifestyle. He has other more obvious money makers like a digital marketing company.

Pic is Tom's latest comments on the issue. For everyone wondering what the VIP sessions are about. Seems like its just a way for rich men with fragile male egos to meet up and do "manly" stuff.

Yes, the pictures of young girls are gross and creepy and clash strongly with Taylor's image, but y'all are wilding acting like Elbow is some kind of pedophile hooker kingpin.

No. 23272

>>23251
Thanks for the summary anon. It makes things a lot clearer. Hopefully people keep screens so things are archived. They're probably on a deleting spree.

>>23271
>VIP membership was just to meet up with other rich men doing things with men
>have an open mind
>might cross the line

Yeah. Totally what other rich men are looking for when they landed on a website with such innocent content.

No. 23273

>>23271
To be fair, he's a shrewd businessman, not an idiot. He's not going to admit if escorts or any kind of legal or illegal salacious content is involved in the paid section. Although he didn't actually deny anything if you carefully read his response.

While the escorts are just speculation, we know he doesn't think there's anything wrong with the underage content on MC by his response to >>23239

The girls section was part of MC since it's inception ( >>23251 ), so it was always meant to be a big feature of the website. He also admitted to seeking out Taylor for work, so he was actively involved in the content of his websites for at least some time. He was also attracted to dolly Taylor and she dressed and acted like a little girl for the MC work he gave her.

No. 23274

>>23246
Wow. Google Translate is really something else.

Title: Look Only, Don't Touch (essentially See See No Touch), 13 Year Old Model Jemima Robinson

>Although 2005 is thirteen years ago, I'm sure everyone remembers what they were doing then: those born after the 70s supposedly working towards their careers, 80s-90s probably still in school, as for the millennials? Half of them in diapers and the other half weren't even made yet. And as for the model we are introducing today, she was just born!

>That's right, this beauty that looks to be 18-19 years old is actually Jemima Robinson from Australia. She was born in 2005, making her only 13 years old this year. Although she cannot enter arcades yet, she is an established swimwear model. Although you can't say much about her figure (she's only 13, what did you expect), but she is beautiful and is has good body proportions, which is still pleasing to the eye.
>Back then, when 15-year-old model Li Yun took swimwear photos, they took it to the courts, but now 13-year-old Jemima Robinson takes swimwear photos and there is nothing to it. Is it due to cultural differences, the times, or just the people?

Sorry, noticed some grammatical errors and tried to fix them.

No. 23275

>>23267
gravure has been going on in Japan since forever, it's socially acceptable and even goes into weekly manga for kids. focus on the escort shit but having sexy girls isnt a crime. might as well chase down shonen jump for doing similar

No. 23276

I think moving back to Canada has been good for her. She seems to be thriving so much more

No. 23277

>>23271
I don't get why you would need a vip section for something like car gathering and wine tasting. Since this section is for super wealthy men, they would already have those things at their finger tips?
A vip section with no description of what it would be for someone to sign up is super suspicious. A normal vip section would advertise what it includes, wouldn't it?
I'm surprised he has even replied to these comments, honestly. Great milk. It was a mistake for Taylor to push him to get social media.

No. 23278

>>23277
I don't think the idea is that it's for "super wealthy" men, just anyone who can afford it for which there is obviously an arbitrary cut off number
But it makes it sound more exclusive and desirable to require you to submit your income. It then seems like you'll be hobknobbing with the elite (instead of guys like you with a little extra cash). The same is true for why the actual activities aren't listed in the description. Mystery breeds interest and again makes it seem like a super elite secret society.
Good marketing tbh.

No. 23279

>>23278
Sorry. I meant
isn't an arbitrary cut off number.

No. 23280

>>22891
>>23277
This form works exactly like any other gateway to sex services. Asking for income, what they're looking for, and offering discretion and privacy in return.

>>23262
>$10k a month
North of 50k.

No. 23281

I don't keep up to date with taylor, but will Rosie be coming to Canada or did they leave her behind ?

No. 23282

>>23281
they left her in HK and won't be flying with her until they decide to live in a certain country, cuz they'll be mostly switching between Canada and HK every now and then until they have kids

No. 23283

>>23277
It's almost certainly an escort service for anyone who can afford more than a street prostitute. There's probably some sort of forum and/or directory attached to it, but I doubt it's much more than a run-of-the-mill escort service. At most it might look something like this:

https://projects.seattletimes.com/2017/eastside-prostitution-bust/

No. 23284

>>23277
I don't think he's just doing it for Taylor anymore if he's the one running the Elbow san IG. He updates too frequently, even more than Taylor. He's kind of desperate for attention for someone of his status.

No. 23285

>>23284
I wonder if he is looking for more """models""" for his site. Instagram is full of such models, on constant paid-for "vacations" with pages of bootyshots in bikinis.
It's interesting he is so public on Instagram but not on video/Youtube. Maybe because it's in English he doesn't think it identifies him to people from Hong Kong/China?

>>23280
Agreed, I think that is quite blatant. Men aren't filling out forms like these to go to wine-tasting sessions.

No. 23286

pull found out that ewsan removed the under 18 section on mc but the pages including the 13 yo model and such are still accessible.

No. 23287

pull found out that ewsan removed the under 18 section on mc but the pages including the 13 yo model and such are still accessible.

No. 23288

pull found out that ewsan removed the under 18 section on mc but the pages including the 13 yo model and such are still accessible.

No. 23289

>>23288
Please sage your autism.

No. 23290

>>23285
>Maybe because it's in English he doesn't think it identifies him to people from Hong Kong/China?
Y'know what they speak in HK? English is one of two official languages.

No. 23291

I know taylovers are going to come at me but who would be comfortable with their partner running an escort site but someone who is up for endless shopping, free housing, designer clothes, trips, etc? That speaks volumes about Taylor.

No. 23292

>>23291
This is the exact thing playing on my mind about this. All those cute clothing hauls, ikea shopping trips, international trips = paid for by what?

>>23283
I thought this link was really great and I advise people read it. They even refer to the prostitution ring as a "men's club"

No. 23293

>>23291
she doesn't buy that much designer shit though. If you listen to what she says she's wearing, it's all Zara, Topshop, etc. Like cheap shit. I wish she'd pay more for something and then just keep wearing it.

>>23292
Do you know what a men's club is? Like of course they called it a men's club. Of course Tom's page is call men's club. Doesn't mean shit.
American politics are a men's club, doesn't mean there's escorting… oh wait.

No. 23294

File: 1544936151512.png (317.14 KB, 619x1031, Cheap.png)

>>23293
>Zara
>cheap shit

True that she buys cheap but extremely often. All those "small" purchases add up.

No. 23295

>>23294

I never understood her fuck ton of small purchases of random clothing. She almost always wore the same jeans and rather bland looking tops. It never made sense to me why she even bothered buying new stuff she was never going to wear in the first place. Also, if she did wear it was generally only once. Her more expensive stuff tends to be more her accessories ( ie : bags, sunglasses, jewellery, makeup ), which are mostly purchased gifts from her husband.

She posted on IG story a picture of a survey with one of the questions being something along the lines of "who spends/shops the most" and it was marked as "Taylor". She's probably happy to be married now and have joint banking and finances. ( more money to spend and a husband that probably doesn't care because it hardly puts a dent in his pocket )

No. 23296

>>23295
Her whole family agreed that Tom is the one who spends the most, and honestly seeing that he just casually bought a Nintendo Switch, I can see that.
I still don't see what is the problem with her spending habits, she clearly has the income for it and she's not flaunting it so what really is the problem here? Should she really just leave her money in her bank account?

No. 23297

>>23285
I doubt a CEO would be the one searching for new models for anything, there are other employees who do that. He has many other businesses too, so he would probably be too busy? Maybe he just likes to post on instagram and be a part of Taylors thing, and he likes the attention and interaction?

>>23296
The hate boner is too strong I guess. The only "problem" I have is that I wish she would buy more ethical pieces and not from sweat shop stores, since she does have the money, but that is just a small nitpick. It would be great if she would influence her younger viewers to start shopping ethically and to stray away from consumerism, but I doubt it would be happening soon, since she seems to love shopping, but I have hope!

No. 23298

>>23297
>I wish she would buy more ethical pieces and not from sweat shop stores
Oh, definetly agree with that. I think she is somewhat trying to do that too, she showed some smaller stores in the vlog with her childhood friend so maybe she will start doing that but her effort does seem halfhearted ngl.

No. 23299

>>23295
As for that, I honestly think we are just buying what she shows on camera.
On vlogs she likes to sort of pass this image of "accessible" by showing her pimps, and having a more bland wardrobe, wearing the same old jeans.
But we don't know, maybe she does wear expensive stuff, and even those constant smaller purchases.
If she's not entirely what we see on camera, why would that be?

No. 23300

>>23299
Because she vlogs almost every day and we see what she's wearing? Do you have some conspiracy theory in which whenever the camera is off she changes into $10k outfits? Especially when we saw what she wore at her "wedding", bridal shower and birthday. If you are secretly wearing expensive brands, those are the kind of events where you'd wear them, but she doesn't. Taylor really likes fast fashion, which isn't great in itself.
Is her spending normal? Probably not. She always has so much stuff with the tags still on, she has a full closet just with Christmas sweaters. It is excessive, and I don't think it's becoming of someone who is 30 and should've found their style.
But it's not like she has couture dresses delivered to her doorstep every morning. She spends a lot, but not so much that she couldn't afford it.

>>23295
Why do you just assume that they have a joint bank account? It's not like you get married and suddenly your finances are magically merged.

I think Taylor is annoying, but you guys are just reaching.

No. 23301

>>23300
Sorry, I thought this thread auto-saged, but apparently not.

No. 23302

>>23300
I have a few Chinese friends and acquaintances and apparently the man has to pay for everything, there are no split costs at dates. Most people are very conservative but of course not all. After marriage wife and husband would share expenses such as living costs, food etcetera because they fusion their belongings together. A lot of Chinese wifes even control the money their husbands are making but I think this applies to rather low income families because I really doubt that Tom would let Taylor manage their entire money. It's more plausible to me that she has probably a monthly allowance. Whatever… we will never know for sure.

No. 23303

is cableav also elbowsan's project? https://www.menclub.hk/thezone/18634

No. 23304

>>23293
>Do you know what a men's club is? Like of course they called it a men's club. Of course Tom's page is call men's club. Doesn't mean shit.
I'm sorry to break it to you but that 'members only' section almost certainly involves escorting. This is how it's often done with higher-end escorting services. The magazine or website functions in part as a catalogue of escorts and there's a member's only forum for the men who fuck them.
>>23299
>If she's not entirely what we see on camera, why would that be?
Because she's a fucking internet celebrity who's trying to maximize attention and profit. Everybody with a vlog is putting on an act; are zoomers really so fucking stupid that they can't understand that? Taylor R and whatever other random idiots you follow are not your friends and are not being sincere to their viewers. They're making it seem as such so that watching their videos triggers a 'this is my friend' response in mentally-stunted kids and teens, who then proceed to consume their boring ass content. Jesus Christ

No. 23305

>>23304
Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. I just wanted to point out that just because there's a prostitution ring that's characterised as a men's club doesn't mean that everything called men's club is a prostitution ring. It's called logic.

Of course she's not her most authentic self on YT, but you guys seem to be so disappointed with how boring she is that you have to make up stuff.
>Plastic surgery
>Actual escort
>She only married Tom so she can sustain her cheap shit shopping addiction

No. 23306

damn, she wears so expensive jewelry on a regular basis with no security around her. Tom just gave her a pair of $5000 earrings. I hope nothing bad happens to her, she just seem so careless wearing everything at once

No. 23307

>>23305

>>Of course she's not her most authentic self on YT, but you guys seem to be so disappointed with how boring she is that you have to make up stuff.


So you are omniscient or what do you want to say with that message? Of course we don't know 100% if she has done this or that or whatever, but this is a gossip site where we gather information and make observations. Then we try to make connections.

>Plastic surgery

>Actual escort
>She only married Tom so she can sustain her cheap shit shopping addiction

Do you have any proof that these points aren't true? No? So you better start doing so or shut your mouth and don't act like you are god. Other anons did make great points why she had fillers in her cheeks and they make a lot of sense. There was an idiot anon trying to make some counterarguments but failed miserably because she literally repeated things parrot-fashion and thought nobody will notice it >>23196 >>744070 >>23127

And the fact that men's club has no transparency makes that site very very shady. If that site has nothing to hide, why wouldn't Tom make it a special club for rich men and their forum only available for their members? It could be literally everything from escorting to dating site to finding new pen pals. But since there are only rich men allowed and everything is exclusive and behind closed doors, I think the speculations are justified.

Only for the last point I'll give a pass because we have no evidence at all. It could be real love. It could be pure calculation too.

Oh and btw I think you sound a lot like that anon who ranted about Taylors privacy on Pull. They suspected you to a friend of hers or a family member. Just my thoughts.

No. 23308

>>23307
Samefag I did a mistake

>And the fact that men's club has no transparency makes that site very very shady. If that site has nothing to hide, why would Tom make it a special club for rich men and their forum only available for their members?


Now it makes more sense

No. 23309

>>23304
>Taylor R and whatever other random idiots you follow are not your friends and are not being sincere to their viewers

Agreed. She is always on max customer service mode, which is one reason why I watch. Everything super palatable, innocuous, friendly happy. I'm sure there are crazy expensive items hidden in closets, screaming fits, depression and illness but she just hops offline when those things happen. I never really get the "this is my friend" affect. It's more like playing a videogame and my character is Taylor? But I know the friend illusion is a common response to Youtubers.

I thought the beginning of the birthday moping video was a reference to PULL and lolcow, did anyone notice that? She talks about "lies" and how some rumours are partly true but she doesn't care. Maybe a ref to the MenClub reveal.

>The magazine or website functions in part as a catalogue of escorts


This is exactly how I see it. I think there's no denying that's what's happening. It'd be illogical to have a public site full of sexy girls and the private site is for…wine tasting?!

No. 23310

>>23257
wow, i didnt recongize her at all. her face looks so slim in this video

No. 23311

>>23306
Are you retarded? People need security to wear expensive jewelry?

No. 23312

>>23311
she's in fucking canada too lol. anon makes her sound like she's on some trek in the middle east.

No. 23313

>>23312
by this anon's logic, it's like everyone with a freakin' wedding ring over $5k needs security now LOL

No. 23314

>>23307
Not that anon but I think what he meant with
>actual escort
was people tinfoiling that Taylor was an actual escort for the site before dating Tom, which honestly sounds more like a Kota sperg than actual speculation. Like, the site is an obvious escourting site but saying she was one is such a reach.
Also, I do think she married Ewbow ~out of love~ simply because if she really wanted she could catch bigger, more attractive fish in Asia and it's also not like their personalities don't match either.

No. 23315

>>23307
Not that anon but I think what he meant with
>actual escort
was people tinfoiling that Taylor was an actual escort for the site before dating Tom, which honestly sounds more like a Kota sperg than actual speculation. Like, the site is an obvious escourting site but saying she was one is such a reach.
Also, I do think she married Ewbow ~out of love~ simply because if she really wanted she could catch bigger, more attractive fish in Asia and it's also not like their personalities don't match either.

No. 23316

>>23307
Not that anon but I think what he meant with
>actual escort
was people tinfoiling that Taylor was an actual escort for the site before dating Tom, which honestly sounds more like a Kota sperg than actual speculation. Like, the site is an obvious escourting site but saying she was one is such a reach.
Also, I do think she married Ewbow ~out of love~ simply because if she really wanted she could catch bigger, more attractive fish in Asia and it's also not like their personalities don't match either.

No. 23317

File: 1545441978184.jpeg (160.08 KB, 1242x397, 157315C2-A889-4C14-8A99-FA39A3…)


No. 23318


No. 23319

>>23308
That's how you do business anon. It also strokes the rich man ego, since all the poor peasants can't afford to assess the site. I'm shocked how people are surprised by this and soon as dude said he liked Tay doll style, it already showed his taste.

No. 23320

>>23284
I think he's doing it for a hobby, dude works all the time,he needs somewhere to blurt out his thoughts. Taylor blab your ears off so not her.

No. 23321

>>23317
What a gross dude. Just read his replies on that comment thread and he’s actually a fucking pedo who sees nothing wrong with it. He sounds borderline MRA.

No. 23322

>>23317
Stop cow tipping you stupid fucks

No. 23323


No. 23324

>>23321
>>23320
>>23319
>dude

samefag better kiki

No. 23325

>>23324
I’m
>>23321
And thats like the only post I’ve ever made in this thread but ok.

No. 23326

>>23323
is this an attempt to be relatable?

No. 23327

>>23326
it's not really different to any other vlog she does.

No. 23328

>>23317
He's deleted all related comments and his replies. I'm surprised he kept responding in the first place.

>>23320
He's a big shot businessman and his hobby is showing off his bathtub and keyboard playing to little girls?

No. 23329

>>23328
Sage your autism and stop cow tipping.

No. 23330

>>23328
Screencap this stuff next time, I'm not gonna trawl through his insta. Also don't cow-tip

I can't believe how obvious it has become that he's the sugar daddy now, the way Taylor talks about money and handles the comments on the Voox sponsored video. And she hid whatever else was in the box which was suspicious.

No. 23331

>>23330
Also please note the edited "song" where he repeats designer names while she models her new clothes.

She will lose fans if she keeps making it this obvious.

No. 23332

>>23330
>>23329
I'm not the cow tipper. I was responding to >>23317

No. 23333

>>23329
>>23330
I was responding to the cow-tipper.

No. 23334

>>23317
I took a screenshot and posted it here but I’m not the one who made that comment on his ig. It could have been someone from pull.

No. 23335

>>23330
I don't think she hid what was in the box, I thought she modeled them in the video?

I think we all know that Tom is super rich, but in the recent video of Taylor driving around her childhood home, she obviously lived in an affluent neighborhood. She comes from money as well. She's being pretty obvious about it now.

No. 23336

>>23331
I totally agree. She is boring and has no personality although she tries to proof us wrong that she is sooo relatable and quirky. But it's seriously cringy and inauthentic. She tries so hard to make a viral video but fails every time. I think the last time she had success was a year ago with her flower eyebrows. She has 1 million subs and makes barely 100.000k views and it won't get better with time. She will lose more and more fans and views. But that doesn't matter because she's rich anyways.

No. 23337

>>23324
Stop being paranoid anon.
>>23336
Now that she's move back she'll get even more boring. Her vlogs with her family is a snooze fest.

No. 23338

>>23331
She's not going to lose fans because she wears designer clothes. She's an aspirational kind of person for them, like "your cool friend who has money and an interesting life". You guys always fantasize about her crashing and burning over things her fans couldn't care less about.

No. 23339

>>23338
It's not about designer clothes. Read the texts above again. It's her need to appear relatable as possible and hiding her wealth as opposed to be authentic. She can't wear designer clothes and be one of the peasants. That's our problem with her and she will lose a lot of fans because of her behaviour. There's nothing worse than an inauthentic and lying influencers. Nobody cares if she's rich, just look at Morphe's horse face Jaclynn Hill or racist Jeffree Star. They are beloved because they don't try to be what they aren't. They are filthy rich people with horrible personalities and they are not hiding it. At least both of them are entertaining as hell but Taylor is a snooze fest.

No. 23340

>>23339
Yes exactly, we've gone from "model" Taylor who lived in Japan to Housewife Taylor who lives in Canada and is gonna have a baby. To me having a sugar daddy and being a housewife is not aspirational. >>23338
At least when she was a working model we could imagine she got her money from her actual work and not just being bankrolled by someone else.

Basically she needs a new job as a cover for all the spending, because currently being a bankrolled housewife and later, bankrolled mommy, is boring and not aspirational at all.

Most people who splash the cash have some sort of job (model, makeup business, whatever) so this is really required if we are gonna progress from this status.

No. 23341

It alwas seems like the money comes just from her dad. Her mom just works at a dental office or sth. Does anybody know what she got from her dad for her birthday?

No. 23342

File: 1545667038162.png (48.63 KB, 695x298, Screen Shot 2018-12-24 at 10.5…)

>>23340

>basically she needs a new job as a cover for all her spending


No. She should own her shit and just be honest, and those that would still be bitching after she owns up to it are likely the ones that only bitch out of jealousy. However, at the moment anons are just annoyed at her pretending to be an "average" level income with no clue what wealth is. It's just as stupid as someone pretending to be ghetto despite growing up in the subs. Plus I'm pretty sure her youtube is making more money than her modelling career ever really did. I know that social blade isn't accurate, but it gives a rough estimate. At this point, I think we can say that her youtube is covering all her spending habits. Not like she's covering any of the big expenses house-wise.

Also, when she moved to Japan she has only had like 7-8 jobs in total for modelling when there. She hasn't done a whole lot of modelling since like late 2013. I will always cringe at anons saying her modelling could support her living and spending habits while in Japan. No. She also started the kawaii trend in late/mid-2012 which was probably when she started becoming pickier about jobs. Which is something she admitted to in a vlog, that she started refusing jobs that didn't fit her cutesy aesthetic.

No. 23343

>>23342
In December she has obviously done Vlogmas, hence more videos and more views. Usually she uploads maybe 2-4 videos a month (with 4 being an absolute maximum) so her income would not be significant from Youtube. Most of the spending of the past month is most certainly covered by Tom.

No. 23344

>>23343

Meh.

Sure, the more expensive designer stuff would be on his credit card.(YLS bags, Chanel,5k earrings,ect) Taylor is usually buying basic bitch fast fashion though. I've seen her social blade for other months as well and it usually was 1.2-2mil views which is still decent. What do you think she spends her money on? Clearly, not any bills as it def wouldn't cover those lol but can cover her generic cheap clothing.

I've seen some Youtubers talk about 1mil = 5,000$ and wouldn't be surprised if that is roughly what she makes a month. That's 5k to freely spend a month. You have to also take into account that she has a shit ton of videos also collecting views. This also doesn't cover when she does small brand deals/ads. I will admit though that there is a likely chance that they have a bank account they share for home decor and daily living expenses. ( maybe to make her feel like she's contributing )

No. 23345

>>23340

>>Yes exactly, we've gone from "model" Taylor who lived in Japan to Housewife Taylor who lives in Canada and is gonna have a baby. To me having a sugar daddy and being a housewife is not aspirational.


This. She built her audience on fake personas. First she was kawaii weeb Taylor, then the hip girl who lives in Japan but can't admit she's nearly 30, then 'girlboss' kek and now housewife in Canada and soon-to-be mother. Nothing wrong with that, bless her. But her time on YouTube is over if she doesn't decide to exploit her pregnancy and children. Mommy bloggers are popular and I could see her jumping on this bandwagon because she would do anything for money and success if you look at her past. She is plain, boring and has no personality and nobody will watch her videos because of her. Even clickbait and crazy video ideas can't save her ass. Just look at her views. Tom was the best decision she has ever made because it doesn't matter if she fails, she remains rich af.

No. 23346

>>23344
$5,000 a month is a gross overestimation. According to research by Offenburg University, youtubers with average 1.4 million monthly views make less than $16,800 USD a year today. NYT also reported it was 1mil=$2,000 before tax and youtube's %45 cut four years go. The quality of ads, use of ad-blockers, etc also affects revenue.

Why ‘Success’ on YouTube Still Means a Life of Poverty: http://fortune.com/2018/02/27/youtube-success-poverty-wages/

Don't forget the money that needs to go into the video. It's unlikely she makes enough to even live frugally on her own. Also, fast fashion and cafe trips add up.

No. 23347

I really don’t know how to feel about Taylor after hearing about the whole MC scandal. I still want to believe she is a good person deep down, but her greed and desire to live this certain lifestyle has honestly ruined her image. She turns a complete blind eye to Tom’s disgusting methods of obtaining money. It’s more disturbing to me that she even got him a cake with the logo. It would have been one thing if she was just quiet about it, but the fact that she and him are both proudly flaunting it is extremely disturbing.

No. 23348

>>23347
Please sage your blogpost.

No. 23349

>>23347

Not only proudly displays logo on the cake and the car, but also she deletes all the comments related to it. She definitely heard of the whole 13 year old girl drama, and yet she never told him it’s freaking wrong. She was model herself, so she should know best.
I doubt her whole ‘I was innocent model, didn’t want to do bikini/underwear shots’ image was even true. I know she wouldn’t bother to look at him if he wasn’t rich so I’m pretty sure her ‘career’ was through his bed.
If you’re from Hong Kong she wasn’t as successful as she wants everyone to think, I know plenty of Eastern European models in HK and they have much larger portfolio and better offers than her. The biggest thing I could remember her from was a Nokia commercial, that’s it.
The rest was just normal shots to newspapers etc. - without his help her career would fade away, sleeping with this disgusting old man was the best decision of her life and helped her in her life. You think why for so many years she catered to his favorite Lolita style? Why she made herself look like a teen? Because that’s what he likes, clearly he is fine with young girls next to porn stars on his website.

She is not as nice and innocent as she wants us to believe, I will not look at her the same way as I did before. I knew their relationship was bit sketchy but I would never think she could know how disturbing he is and still marry him. It only shows her true colors.

No. 23350

>>23349
>>23347
This summarizes my current feelings about it all too, thanks anons.

No. 23351

Have she always been saying "eh" in her videos? Or did she just start after moving back to Canada?

No. 23352

>>23345
I still watch her videos occasionally but she will lose any interest she has for me (and most of her current audience I think) if she becomes a mommy blogger. I originally watched her because she was pretty and I liked somewhat being able to live vicariusly through her, and she wasn't completely out of touch with reality like Pixielocks, for example. If she just leaned into that (the people living vicariously through her thing), she'd be fine. There are tons of people who love to watch rich people doing rich people things because they can't do them. But she does this faux relatable thing which just…doesn't work and is so cringy and ruins any appeal she might have.

No. 23353

>>23352
Exactly~ I never understood people who want her to act more relatable. She obviously has no clue how to. And Honestly, I actually would rather she use her money and show different parts of the world/restaurants/fashion/etc than the whole just DIY posts and cringe content. Like you said, it’s nice to see another view of life that most of us can’t do on the daily like she can. Since she was a model, I never understood why she didn’t dive more into showing different fashion from Japan/China (and I don’t mean her DIYs…) I hate her fast fashion. She looks like she’s just striving to be any girl from Instagram.

No. 23354

>>23353
Taylor does not, and has never, known who she is. She just hops on whatever flavor of the month is popular at the moment, hoping she’ll go viral. It always backfires and makes her look incredibly cringy though. I unsubbed from her yesterday after being a long time viewer. Her faux-relatable act is getting really tired, and I’m tired of her stupid clickbait gimmicks. The Men’s Club “scandal” whatever you want to call it was the cherry on top though. I basically have zero respect for her now, and she’s strayed so far from the content I originally loved her for and followed for. I also could give a fuck less about her upcoming pregnancy/baby bullshit. She’s just going to become an obnoxious mommy blogger/trophy housewife and that’s all she’s ever going to be. She seems to think that 30 is so old and that now’s the time to settle down and grow up, when it’s the complete opposite. It really shows in her content though, she has completely 100% given up. She should prepare herself to lose a giant chunk of her subscriber base when she gets pregnant.

Sage for no one cares and blogpost

No. 23355

>>23346
That doesn't factor in sponsorships though. They can sometimes be thousands of dollars.

No. 23356

>>23346

Shit, it's that bad? So she really isn't affording much of anything besides her phone bill and a couple parcels. I'm almost wondering now if she has been getting an allowance from Tom.

>>23355

How often is that even? It feels like she doesn't really get a whole lot of sponsorships.

No. 23357

>>23356
If I remember right, she had one earlier this month & didn't even mark it as a sponsored video like she is required to, so I wouldn't be surprised if she has avoided mentioning other sponsors.

That said, I doubt she is making enough to support herself. Maybe when she was also modeling, but no way is she now. Tom likely pays for almost everything.

No. 23358

>>23354
Agreed, I have no idea why she thinks she's washed up and ancient now at 30- there's plenty of working models, she could start a business, mentor people, make the website she's been saying she'll make for a year now. She's not unintelligent, she can write, edit, present, and model, and probably more (SEO/web advertising/content promotion)


But she just wants to have a baby or two and be a mommy vlogger. I think she feels left out from her sisters & friends but she'll look back at 40 and wish she didn't throw in the towel this quick.

No. 23359

>>23358
She has every right to be a rich wife and mommy, if that's what her heart desires. Each their own. But at the same time she wants us to believe that's she's relatable AND a savvy business woman and learning from Tom how to built a successful business kek. The reality looks different though. She always talks about it but does nothing. I have the feeling that the age thing is just an excuse to do nothing at all. 'Oh I am a 30 year old woman, sooo old now, I should have kids, omg my life is over!1!' There are a lot of women who hit a certain age and behave completely different. Could be a midlife crisis. Or like you said, she's looking at her friends and sisters who already have a family.

No. 23360

>>23355
Her average views per video is 100K-200K and she doesn't upload regularly. She can't charge that much, especially for small sponsors and Beauty Exchange & MC were responsible for many of her sponsored videos in the past. Then subtract tax and other fees/deductions.

Social Blade says Taylor lost over 1,000 subscribers on Dec 14. What happened? Since then, she's gained almost 6,000 subscribers.

No. 23361

>>23360
youtube purged a lot of fake accounts recently, that could be why.

That was also the day she posted the tattoo video though, so maybe the clickbait pissed a lot of people off.

No. 23362

>>23351
she just started it, and i find it really distracting.

No. 23363

I sometimes wonder if Taylor would have felt intimidated by Peachmilky had they been in Tokyo around the same time since they have so many mutual friends. Peach caters towards older men by cosplaying/doing the whole doll thing on Twitch/Patronage for cash. Fits right up Elbow-san’s alley.

No. 23364

>>23363
I don't think so, at least not more than any other woman feels intimidated by other women. They seem to really love and appreciate each other (not that it always prevents men from cheating, but at least it often makes them not cheat with random thots).

No. 23365

>>23363
>>23364
I don’t think he would blatantly cheat on her, but I wonder if he would have approached her for working opportunities on MC similar to how he plastered Taylor on the site when she was in her doll phase. He comes off as a shady character and I think it was somewhat telling how Taylor kept worrying he would cheat on her in the past.

No. 23366

>>23360
An average of 100-200k is generous when almost half of her vlogmas videos are sitting below 100k

No. 23367

>>23359
>>23353
>>23354

A bunch of these recent posts read like Kiki talking to herself, don’t they?

No. 23368

>>23367

They're not angry enough to be Kiki. If they were screeching about her being a hoe sucking that rich dick for money, then yes it would be Kiki sounding.


>>23366

I haven't watched any of her vlogs in quite some time, are they really doing that bad ?

No. 23369

>>23367
I’m one of those and although that would be pretty hilarious- not everyone here is a TayTay stan, anon. I used to be, but her true colors are showing and now I’m just telling it like i see it.

No. 23370

>>23367
Didn't know my post reads like Kiki. I guess I have to improve my language skills

>>23368
If you go back to sperg chan's thread, you'll see that she sometimes wrote pretty ordinary posts which I've never guessed to be Kiki. Of course there were some very hateful ones in between but it could be possible that she's writing with us here right now and flying under the radar. Some comments here which suggest Taylor was an escort/prostitute and Tom a pedo and goes regularly to prostitutes are suspicious though and a complete reach.

No. 23371

>>23358
I actually think she's kind of stupid, based on the way she speaks and sometimes has to look up what (english) words mean in her videos. But she absolutely could still be working as a model, she's aged well and 30 isn't even old. The types of jobs she gets might change but you don't automatically lose your value as a model once you turn 30. In fact i think she looks much better now than during her dolly phase, and she's more marketable becausee she isn't insisting on wearing circle lenses or doing her own makeup to keep up the image. She has a more mainstream look now and there's no reason why she wouldn't get jobs. She's just lazy.

No. 23372

I can definitely see her having some kind of mid life crisis at 40 like Bernice Burgos. Only because she has never truly been herself, or found her passion in life. Taylor could have easily made it as a model and had major sucess with her looks if she tried or had a passion for it. But she's lazy af and just took the easy way out in the form of sugarbaby turned wife. She even lived in JP&HK but gave up learning Japanese and didnt even attempt Chinese. Her YT content has gone downhill and she hasn't put much effort into that for awhile. The only thing she put effort into is Ew san thats it. It's just amazing how lazy she is given all those opportunities she's had.

No. 23373

>>23372
Do you know how many years Taylor has lived in Honk Kong and Japan?
People are always saying Kota is lazy af which she certainly is but regarding language skills Kota is miles ahead of Taylor. If I was Taylor, I would be ashamed of my inability of speaking Chinese. I don't know if she's just lazy or stupid but she certainly doesn't value the opportunities which were given to her. She has a very privileged mindset if she really thinks she doesn't need to learn Chinese now that her second residence is in Hong Kong and her husband is Chinese. Tom had to learn English in order to communicate with her although she was living in Hong Kong.
Now I sound like Kiki for real kek

No. 23374

>>23373

Instead of learning any of the languages to the places she lived she just hired a translator to teach her to say a couple sentences for videos. ( And then claim she could speak the language at the time ) I'll never understand why she won't attempt to learn any Chinese though. Her communication with Tom seems so limited, I just imagine their conversations are of like that of cave people. " No" "yes" "Food" "BABE" "Hunger" "Sex" "Sleeep" ( I'm being over exaggerative but he does seem to struggle a lot with finding the words to respond )


When she does have a child I think she is going to really struggle with Youtube. Hard to edit for 6 hours straight or vlog every second. I highly doubt Tom will be giving up much work hours due to being the one that is the main income. Plus having an infant makes it hard to do lengthy DIYs or hours of shopping. I could also see her having a meltdown if her body doesn't completely snap back into shape.

No. 23375

So many doors could have opened for her alone just learning Chinese&Japanese. She could have found a good job. But nope that was too hard. Making her own money and such. Yet spend years dressing like an underaged girl to keep the interest of a creepy old guy. Priorities.

No. 23376

So many doors could have opened for her alone just learning Chinese&Japanese. She could have found a good job. But nope that was too hard. Making her own money and such. Yet spend years dressing like an underaged girl to keep the interest of a creepy old guy. Priorities.

No. 23377

>>23374
Her oldest sister is overweight and so is their mom. Her youngest siblings go after their dad who is rather slim. Taylor will have a hard time considering her past as a child with being a little bit overweight. I could imagine her freaking out because she's already making a big deal about being 30. Girl has issues.

No. 23378

>>23372
>>23373
>>23374
>>23375
Sage your autism please.

No. 23379

Has anyone sent any of this into a gossip or commentary youtuber? I can't help but think "husband of youtuber with young female audience owns website exploiting young girls" would be a headline worth grabbing.

I dunno, I don't want anyone to attack Taylor, but I feel like this needs to get out to a wider audience than just lolcow and PULL. :/

No. 23380

No.
Fuck off newfag.

No. 23381

>>23380

damn bruh, @me at least

No. 23382

>>23377
she was never overweight. she was a child who hadn't yet hit puberty yet.

No. 23383

>>23378
Half of these are saged you idiot

No. 23384

>>23379
This seems like a witch hunt. It's ok to write your thoughts here on lolcow but Taylor isn't expose-worthy imo. She's like any other fame and money hungry women. We don't know if she's okay with his behaviour, maybe Tom and her are fighting over it, who knows. The cake with the MC logo and the fact that she married him speaks against her on the other hand. Idk. Tom is maybe expose-worthy but you need more proof. Saying in a video that he is a pedo or whatever is defamation. You can only argue that he doesn't care about the rights of children and exploiting them for his gain. And all the cowtipping is seriously dumb and unnecessary.

>>23382
She said that in a video. Do you think I made this up? There are also some childhood pics she showed where you can see it's not only a little bit chub.

No. 23385

>>756811
This whole thread is autism, especially your posts.

No. 23386

>>23374
She's going to 1000% get a nanny, she seems very happy with Natalie so someone like that. Tom would pay, happy taylor, nothing changes. Also I question whether she really does all her editing, I suspect she outsources some of it, like with vlogmas. She was very busy each day, there wasn't really enough time to edit every video.

No. 23387

>>23386
Doubt it given how crappy it is. Besides she released every video super late this year. Editing is one of things that I believe she does because of the lack of quality.

No. 23388

>>23386

I can't see her hiring a full-time nanny. Also, I feel like her fans that are right up her ass would rip her a new one for hiring a nanny just so she can live carefree. She's in the public eye and films everything, in other words, people will constantly be looking for things to judge her for. Anyways, I can't see Taylor being that self-absorbed and vain that even her own child comes second to shopping and beauty. She'll probably return the era where she never left her house and was just mopping about. Besides, isn't her regular upload rate like once or twice a week?

>>23387

It's actually possible knowing all the other retarded things she's hired people to do for her. Her assistant is shit and even shittier at filming, which leads me to believe she probably would hire a shitty editor for cheap.

No. 23389

>>23388
It depends imo. If she wants to continue her carefree life with a child, then she will absolutely hire a nanny. But if she decides to go the mommy blogger route, she won't hire a nanny because that's inauthentic. She will most definitely hire a household help because she is rather messy and with a child the whole house is gonna be a huge stinky diapers dump.

No. 23390

Despite the fact they like eachother and all that stuff, do you guys think Tom eventually cheats on Taylor with this type of "cute, childish" girls?
It's sort of common for business men to be around women who attends events or even after business meetings with the purpose to entertain (not aways involve sex).

No. 23391

>>23390

Would Taylor even care?

She is guaranteed money and is slowly building her fame. The number of women married to wealthy womanizers never really seem to care about love but rather just the cash and vanity.


To my fellow anons, because I'm curious about others opinions. Can you eventually look past someone's ugly appearance and learn to love them? Including the lack of communication as well. Also, as I recall from old vlogs he's gone for long periods of time due to business.

No. 23392

>>23391

If I'm not physically attracted to someone, I'm not physically attracted to them. No amount of money, emotion connection, or romcom cliche will change that, so no I couldn't be in a relationship with them.

But hey, maybe I'm just shallow lol

No. 23393

>>23391

Don't think so. Sexual attraction is just as important in a healthy relationship. I'm wiling to guess Taylor is asexual and does "the deed" with Elbow face just to appease him.

No. 23394

>>23391
Honestly I never take appearance into account. Like sure, i'm vain when it comes to myself, i'm into cosmetics, fashion etc but when it comes to a partner, my criteria is solely based on my mental and emotional connection to that person, which obviously depends on their personality traits, character, values etc. For me, love and relationships is a mental thing, I don't really think about the physical aspects and I seldom find men "physically attractive" (because my attraction is based on other things so "good looks" don't tend to catch my attention).

I can't tell from her videos how shallow and superficial Taylor truly is. Like obviously she seems extremely privileged and that might suggest that she has some gold-digging tendencies ingrained in her, but idk her husband is kinda endearing and I could see him being a good choice for a life partner considering he's hardworking, well-travelled, experienced in industry and in his personal life (so he can probably manage his relationships well). These are definitely the types of things that would be important in a husband, especially if I was older/Taylor's age.

No. 23395

>>23391
Maybe my opinion is different because I'm very non-sexual (i hate using tumblr terms like "ace" or "demisexual" or whatever but yeah, i just don't really care about sex at all) so I could see myself falling in love with someone without physical attraction. But i don't think most people would feel that way.

No. 23396

I don't think she is asexual, she makes an innuendo nearly every video. She has yellow fever which may help, but if you can overlook bikini pics of teenagers on your husband's website you can probably overlook an age gap. He isn't ugly at all, just normal looking. I'm more concerned about their level of communication, it can't be a very deep relationship unless he sends a lot of texts/emails/non-verbal, because their verbal communication is pish

No. 23397

>>23391

>Can you eventually look past someone's ugly appearance and learn to love them?


I tried 2 times and failed 2 times. I wasn't sexually attracted to my last boyfriends at all but they had 'good characters'. So I didn't want to be superficial and gave them a chance. But everytime I sensed a slightly negative thing about them like them being messy or farting in front me in full blast, I felt disgusted and I asked myself: why am I together with him? If I was attracted to the guy, I wouldn't mind at all and would just laugh about it. Even if he was rich af, I couldn't pretend to be attracted to him. I'm not that desperate.

So in my opinion you can't learn to love somebody you aren't attracted to because their minor flaws will always appear huge to you.(Blogposting)

No. 23398

All the anons here are just salty that all this milk about Taylor , didn’t come from kota… all this years and even now they are still beating a dead horse … all the things they speculated about Kota came true from Taylors side and it’s just too hard for anons to accept and it’s pretty funny how they sperg every time this gets pointed out

No. 23399

>>23398
Can you fucking sage your shit Kaka? Nobody is interested in your opinion you balding sack of flesh

No. 23400

>>23373
Definitely a combination of being lazy af, dumb (in her last vlogmas video she couldn't even come up with the word "automatic" on her own when describing an automatic snowglobe, oh and remember WW3?) and having the convinience of being in the position of hiring a translator/assistant

No. 23401

>>23399
If you truly think that Kota hasn't fucked someone for jobs at this point, I don't know what to say. It's the only explanation for her career regardless of what Taylor has or hasn't done.
She would have been back home years ago otherwise, probably after her first failed six months.
And hey at least Taylor had a good 6-7 years of model work before she met Tom. And was originally able to get signed without having to catfish.
She had some kind of bizarre quarter life crisis when she got to her mid twenties and was infected by the kawaii plague but before that she was just a normal pretty model.

No. 23402

>>23401
I didn’t say Kota didn’t do those thing , but if even 5% of what we know about Taylor came to light about Kota we wouldn’t see the end of it .. for he most part Kota also is almost not posting anything anymore and tylor is very active … what I’m trying to say it’s since everybody is salty that is not Kota who was found out , they won’t allow any discussion about tylor.
Even defending they’re disgusting website.

No. 23403

>>23402
Who is defending that website?
Also please type sage in the email field, it stops the thread from being bumped with your non-milk

No. 23404

>>23402
People aren't shutting down conversation about Taylor because they are salty about Kota. It's just annoying because newfags keep coming in and bumping the thread with no milk. If Taylor for example, makes a video addressing MC that is milk. Or if she posts a new video, picture, inst-story. If she gets pregnant. Milk.
People claiming that she's an escort, or writing long spergy paragraphs about how she's not real; That's not milk.
Right now what we have is a lot of conjecture, blown up into the most sensationalistic extremes by a-logging morons. Which is all welcome when it's saged.
Your post for example should be saged because it's just you whining about shit and contributes nothing new or interesting to this thread.

No. 23405

>>23402
I kind of see your point. For sure we wouldn't see the end of it cause kota has no one defending her. What I noticed before the whole MC thing came out is that anons speculated a lot about kota but when the same was done about Taylor (when some anons said that probably Taylor was superficial and liked the money) a lot of anons came to defend her.

No. 23406

>>23405
Wtf are you talking about? There are constantly people defending Kota and shitting up that thread. Look right now. There is a massive post defending her most recent lukewarm efforts.
For fucks sake there were posts defending her when she lied about having cancer last year.
Both Kota and Taylor have their defenders.

No. 23407

File: 1546364597206.jpg (9.81 KB, 600x315, 8KTtscB.jpg)

>>23379
>I don't want anyone to attack Taylor

No. 23408

An interesting video from MC to keep you entertained this new year http://nicoco.net/sm33414807

No. 23409

>>23406
Why do I feel like the phrase "both kota and Taylor come here to defend themselves" coukd also be true? We alreasy know both Kiki and Dakota come here to stan themselves and each other and to keep tabs on Taylor. Plus, it's not impossible that Taylor comes here too, she's had threads on the site as long as kota has.

No. 23410

>>23409
Wishful thinking anon. Taylor has never been shown to have those kind of tendencies. She seems to prefer burying her head in the sand instead of confronting her problems. Even on her own social media she ignores things until she absolutely can't avoid addressing them.
Kota and Kaka are much more overtly confrontational. And tbh just much nastier personality wise.

No. 23411

>>23408
Girl pictures and videos in that men's club webpage are just some normal gravure idols, what you can see everywhere in Japan, Korea & China. Gravure images can look quite shady to western eyes, because of their young models, but it's totally legit business in that part of the world.

I copypasted this definition from wikipedia:

"Gravure idols appear in a wide range of photography styles and genres. Their photos are largely aimed at male audiences with poses or activities intended to be provocative or suggestive, generally accentuated by an air of playfulness and innocence rather than aggressive sexuality. Although gravure idols may sometimes wear clothing that exposes most of their body, they seldom appear fully nude.
Gravure idols may be as young as pre-teen age up to early thirties. In addition to appearing in mainstream magazines, gravure idols often release their own professional photobooks and DVDs for their fans. Many popular female idols in Japan launched their careers by starting out as gravure idols."

No. 23412

>>23411
so… pedo pin-up. it looks sketchy because it is.

No. 23413

File: 1546472253943.jpg (46.21 KB, 600x400, the-legal-age.jpg)

>>23412
It's common knowledge that Japan, China and Korea are somewhat kinkier on sexual matters than western countries.

No. 23414

>>23411
So?

>>23413
Funny thing about that. It's actually 18 and a 26 year old woman was just arrested for having a "sleepover" with a 16-year old.

And if you think it isn't shady in Asian eyes just because it's legal, I have a bridge to sell you…

No. 23415

>>23411
Not to mention that the gravure idol in that video is 25.

No. 23416

>>23412
just because you just figured out gravure is a thing because its related to taylor now youre upset? get your moralfagging out of here.

gravure makes girls money and often launches their careers, see akb48

No. 23417

>>23411
You can go fuck yourself if you think just because something is legal means it’s Alright morally. Yeah you can buy photo books of 5 year olds in bikinis taking baths and that’s “legal” possession of child porn was legal in Jpn until a few years ago. Neither of these are ok. Stop being a gross weeb. Some of us actually detest this stuff and fight against it.

>>23413 you must be truly pathetic to believe random sexpat pandering memes. Have fun on your trip to Thailand. Scrot

No. 23418

>>23417
Nta but, is a 20 something in a bikini worth this much hyperventilating?

No. 23419

>>23417
An adult who LOOKS young isn't morally bad and you're reaching to say its related to Taylor. Lolcow isn't your personal soapbox. Fuck off.

No. 23420

>>23416
>gravure makes girls money and often launches their careers
cool motive, still pedo pin-up

and you fuck off. I don't give a shit about someone who looks like PULL would obsess over. You retards keep bumping the thread.

No. 23421

>>23420
Well no it's not "pedo" unless they are prepubescent. I wish that morons like you would stop throwing that term around so casually. It diminishes the significance of the actual term when you use it like that for things that are objectively not "pedo".
So if you like "ephebo" pinup.

No. 23422

>>23420
Why do you act like some child savior lmao

More often than not these girls want to do gravure so why are you trying to be full on sjw and ‘save them’ by trying to harpoon some guy who isn’t even the head of the gravure industry? Sounds like you have a white savior complex tbh

No. 23423

>>23421
You know who gives a shit about the difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia? Pedophiles. Regular people don't want to fuck non-adults at all.

No. 23424

>>23423
Well I was deliberately being pedantic to annoy you anon because you are acting so ridiculous about this. The video posted was of a grown ass woman in normal bikini. All of the women in that section seem to be of age. The anon who originally posted the video as a gotcha clearly thought they were revealing something shady. But they weren't.

No. 23425

>>23423
>You know who gives a shit about the difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia? Pedophiles.

and you know, people who understand that small children can't even feel sexual arousal and can die from rape but okay.

No. 23426

>>23423
>Regular people don't want to fuck non-adults at all.

Oh honey I’m so sorry reality is fucked

No. 23427

>>23420
The thread is in auto-sage because of frothing autists like yourself sweetie

No. 23428

>>23427
lol it hasn't been in auto-sage for a month
>>22938
Maybe don't try to patronize when it makes you look like said retard, sweetie.

No. 23429

>>23428
So what other google translate milk do you have or are you just going to bitch about models I’m bikinis

No. 23430

@everyone above.

Cease the sperging, I'm sure Taylor will post something soon and you can actually talk about the thread topic. She posted a few frantic-looking gym clips on Instagram stories today.

And sage your shit

No. 23431

>>23424
Nope, not a gotcha. It's a funny contrast to Elbow's motivational q&a's and comments about how tasteful his work is and some of these risque videos have been deleted from his channel and saved elsewhere. Never claimed it was an under-18 video because I thought it was obvious it wasn't, and that's why it was sagged. Then someone dropped in to explain "gravure" for the 100th time for whatever reason, which triggered >>23412, who triggered… Anyway, sorry guys.

No. 23432

Can anyone who knows Chinese please translate

No. 23433

Can anyone who knows Chinese please translate

No. 23434

>>23431
But that's the thing it's not risque at all. I've seen more risque things on daytime tv. It's also still up on the official youtube channel along with rest of those videos, so your other point about deleting things is just wrong.
Also not sure how this is a contrast. Motivated business-people can still do sleazy things. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

No. 23435

File: 1546638300477.jpg (129.91 KB, 970x572, vm0va1yvIZA.jpg)

just a couple interesting old pics I found

No. 23436

File: 1546638371831.jpg (128.93 KB, 960x568, EOqGgXNbt2g.jpg)


No. 23437

>>23435
her fucking posture is terrible

No. 23438

>>23437
>her fucking posture is terrible

She's slouching to create a more interesting shape and contrast the other model she's with. It's deliberate. It's what the photographer asked her to do. Given the brands involved, this looks like editorial and slouching is more high fashion.

No. 23439

>>23437
You couldn’t reach more. It’s a high fashion pose

No. 23440

iT's HiGh FaShuN
who cares? it looks fucking terrible to me. The other girl looks more relaxed and pulls it off way better. Fucking taytay stans are insufferable.

No. 23441

>>23440
The other girl was clearly instructed to do a different kind of pose. Contrast for visual interest. Tay is slouching forward. The other girl is leaning back.
The photographer/art director decides what they want and the models execute it. It's not their decision.
How is it stanning to point out the logistics of a fucking photoshoot?
You sound like a massive sperg.

No. 23442

>>759204
I don't know which of your FOUR posts I should reply to. The other girl is also doing the same pose in the first picture but taylor looks like she has a buffalo hump tf

No. 23443

>>23442
The site fucked up you sperg. I deleted the extras. You still don't seem to know how an editorial shoot works.
>The other girl is also doing the same pose in the first picture but taylor looks like she has a buffalo hump tf
And apparently you're blind.

No. 23444

>>23443
It's like anon's never seen a makeup ad or a magazine or anything involving a model ever.

No. 23445

>>23444
I have and taylor's posture is not pleasant to me. what are you going to do? sue me cause I don't like it? pussy lickers

No. 23446

>>23445
>what are you going to do? sue me cause I don't like it?
No. You're entitled to not like it. I don't particularly like it myself. But it's what the photographer/art director wanted.
>pussy lickers
And now you just sound like Kaka.

No. 23447

>>23446
I'm not kaka for sure and I wasn't referring to the poses but her posture.

No. 23448

>>23447
Bless your heart.

No. 23449

>>23445
>>23447

Anons are always complaing about Kota's bad posture and suddenly you come here saying that Taylor has a ~BaD PoSTurE. Taylor was instructed to do this. She has generally a very good posture and a modelly aura which Kota only can dream of. Oh that pussy licker thing you have 100% from the Kota thread too. There was an anon who was glorifying Kota a few days ago and she was called a pussy licker kek.

No. 23450

>>23449
glorifying kota like you're glorifying taylor? she definitely has a bad posture for not doing anything all day.

No. 23451

>>23450
You are too stupid to exist.
No one glorifying Taylor. We are trying to explain that as a working model (which she was at the time that she did this shoot because it's old) she doesn't get to decide how she poses. And considering that posing is a slouch it's related to her posture. You can't slouch and have "good posture". They are polar opposites. You can say that she has bad posture in her everyday life and I'd agree, but that's not applicable in an editorial photoshoot where she's been instructed to slouch with a concave back.

No. 23452

>>23451
we get it. You're smart. I think the first picture, the one at the right looks bad and not "high fashion" and I thought her bad posture made it look bad. That's what I think. I hope I'm clear enough now. If not whatever seriously.

No. 23453

File: 1546698999465.png (2.77 MB, 1242x2208, CB190464-6163-4EB8-B739-960DA7…)

For love of God, can someone teach this girl how to hold chopsticks? 10 years in Asia, and she hasn’t learn any new language nor even how to hold chopsticks properly.

No. 23454

>>23453
>>23437
https://littlefakedolls.tumblr.com/ does this happen to be your blog? The saltiness is real

No. 23455

>>23454
Me and the other anon are two different people, I just can’t stand her trying to be an ‘expert’ and introducing people on her channel with Asian culture (“OMG I love learning new stuff and experience other cultures”) but irl she’s a poser, just how she always was.(pathetic nitpick)

No. 23456

>>23454
Nah the anon who posted >>23437 is a Kota stan obviously. Read the posts below and you'll see. And the blog is about exposing people like Kota, so they can't be the same people at all.

No. 23457

>>23455
I've seen this argument made on PULL as well and tbh I never thought she was trying to be an "expert". She usually tries to introduce people who actually know what they are talking about when it comes to cultural stuff. She's pretty humble about her knowledge or usually lack there of. Compared to Miranda, Rachel, Mimei etc she definitely doesn't come off like a know it all.
I just think that some people are so far into "bitch eating crackers" territory with her that they take offense at everything she does.
I mean why does it matter to you that she says she likes learning new things? And given that she's lived abroad for 10 years voluntarily, I would say that she does enjoy different cultures.

No. 23458

>>23457
I agree. Anons are reaching with the discussion about her posture and her being an expert. The only thing you could criticize is Taylor being quiet about the whole MC thing. I already reported a handful of posts because the thread smells like Kaka.

No. 23459

File: 1547013509783.png (432.04 KB, 613x758, jVBGCCC.png)


No. 23460

>>23459
could have been better written, but it's cool nonetheless. makes me feel a little proud

No. 23461

File: 1547050602196.png (195.59 KB, 445x450, 1439416971948.png)

>>23459
Just so you know, we are here to observe, not to intervene with the cow's lives or to cowtip.

I'm interested of what will come out of this, though

No. 23462

>>23459
Holy shit, people! Don't you believe in bad karma? Sooner or later justice would have happened but intervening with a cows life? Really?!

Now Taylor has no other choice but to address all of this. Apologize and delete all of this disgusting stuff on MC. But I doubt it will happen since it's Toms' website and Taylor has no say how he has to lead his business. If one of those big thirsty drama channels see this, it's over for her and his career and reputation.

No. 23463

File: 1547111654100.png (2.73 MB, 1920x1080, Taylor.png)

What is going on with her cheeks? They look super weird in the first bit of her newest vlog, like they're starting to sag

No. 23464

>>23463
That looks like normal signs of aging to me. Not calling her old. People with larger cheeks develop marionette lines earlier. I suspect she's had some filler in her marionette lines, but it never completely resolves the problem and eventually it dissolves.

No. 23465

>>23462
I am not sure anyone from here wrote that (who would call lolcow "fans"?). Someone from ONTD saw the thread and wrote an article about it on a laughable livejournal. Why is this cause for outrage?

No. 23466

>>23465
I have zero doubt that some vendetta-chan from here tipped someone to write that, as this thread has so little traffic and is so nitpicky and dull that there's little chance that someone random would just stumble upon it. It's a cause for "outrage" because cowtipping and intervening is against the site rules, and that article just randomly happening to a cow whose thread has an insane amount of vendetta-chans, salty anons and nitpickers is very unlikely. I mean, just look at these posts >>23463 >>759556 >>23437 It's like she attracts autistic newfags who don't know how this site works, they even commented on Tom's instagram and posted it here.

What's done is done, but for the love of god anons, stop being autistic and just let things happen without forcing it. Make a fucking tumblr to expose them if you're not capable of following the rules here.

No. 23467

>>23466

I think its more likely someone from PULL rather than someone from here. Taylor's thread is generally pretty dead with rather tame/repetitive nitpicking for the most part.

No. 23468

>>23466
Sure, somebody tipped someone off, but I think it's a lot to assume that it was a poster in this thread. They took a lot of screencaps and things posted from this thread, but also stuff from PULL that was not posted here.

It's weird that you're so bothered about the fact that Taylor is getting negative publicity on some LJ (oh noes, her life is oooover). Seriously? She married this guy, and worked for MC from its inception. She doesn't care, no one really cares about it; if influential people did, the world would be a different and better place.

I still do not know what the ONTD article has to do with cowtipping or intervening. You don't think Taylor is worth a thread? Fine. But people have the right to talk about her.

The worst thing that happened were those questions and posts on Tom's Instagram. I agree, that's cowtipping. That's intervening. An article about Taylor on another blogging platform? Discussion of Tom's company and its ethics on lolcow? Dumb posts about Taylor and Tom and their plans to have a baby on PULL? That's how the internet works when you are a YoUtUbEr and iNfLuEnCeR.

No. 23469

>>23466
samefag but how would it be different if this had been posted on tumblr and not on a livejournal

No. 23470

>>23468
You're reaching. Tom is the one who deserves all negativity related to MC and not Taylor. If you think carefully, there was no way she knew about that 13 year old girl because that magazine has dozens of articles online except she was a reader herself and read all articles religiously. She probably found out at the same time we found out. We can't prove otherwise and that's a fact.

She can't do anything about it because it's his business and not hers. Yes, I agree, she shouldn't have married him. But punishing her with an article on ONTD is more than unfair. Tom should have been the center of attention but instead we see two pictures of her and a question about what she has to say about this situation. I don't doubt that it's intresting what she has to say but Tom should be the one to justify his actions. This is 100% a vendetta-chan because she is shifting Toms guilt to Taylor.

And no-one is questioning the discussion about Taylor. She is a cow and she deserves a thread but what this vendetta-chan did is not okay and is definitely against the rules.

No. 23471

>>23470
LOL it literally talks about TOM. Practically the whole article is about him, and he's in the gif heading the article. Why is his name not in the title? Because no one who reads that livejournal knows who Tom Lip is. He's not a known name there.

Nothing unkind was said about Taylor - unless you think pointing out that she WORKED FOR MC is unkind. She did! So she has a pretty good idea of what kind of business it is. And yes, anon, "Taylor has yet to comment on the subject." Ah, actually that isn't true - she commented defending her husband but then deleted it, because that's what Taylor does.

What, again, happened that violated the rules of this site? (Aside from that person who interrogated Tom on IG.) That article never blamed Taylor for what happens on Tom's site. The article states she hasn't commented. That's it.

I never said Taylor shouldn't have married him. I kind of think they are right for each other, honestly.

No. 23472

>>23470
>If you think carefully, there was no way she knew about that 13 year old girl because that magazine has dozens of articles online except she was a reader herself and read all articles religiously. She probably found out at the same time we found out. We can't prove otherwise and that's a fact.

She was doing the whole "dolly" thing when Tom met her, there's no way she doesn't know he's into kids …

No. 23473

Someone on PULL admitted to commenting on Tom's IG. The MC stuff broke out here long before it reached PULL, but it wasn't until it started blowing up on PULL that people began contacting Tom and Taylor about it.

Taylor isn't a celeb and MC is for Chinese speakers in HK so ONTD shouldn't affect Tom or his business much. Could be a problem for the 13 year old model and her parents if it gets out.

No. 23474

>>23472
She didn't look like a child though. Dolly doesn't equal kid. Most who do or did that style aren't trying to look like children. They just want to look cute. Also, It was a subculture that was pretty popular in 2012-2013 when they met and only taken a bit further than gyaru.

No. 23475

>>23474
look at the thread image and tell me she isn't trying to look like a child

No. 23476

>>23475
That's not what she looked like when they met though. That was from 2015/2016 when her weird dolly thing was at it's peak. She was trying to fit herself into the Japanese market by filling a niche that didn't really work.

No. 23477

>>23475
That's not what she looked like when they met though. That was from 2015/2016 when her weird dolly thing was at it's peak. She was trying to fit herself into the Japanese market by filling a niche that didn't really work.

No. 23478

>>23477
she was dressing as a schoolgirl, skip to about 4 minutes in if you don't believe

No. 23479

>>23477
>>23478
and samefag but if you watch the video, she's known Elbow since at least 2014 and says that she was doing the dolly thing when she met him; it's a long video but maybe worth it to watch after this MC stuff has come to light

No. 23480

Tfw this thread is back on autosage, thanks spergs.

I doubt Taylor will EVER address the MC issue. Most of her subscribers don't know about it. Maybe 1000 of us know and a dozen to thirty people are talking about it online. Addressing that to say 200,000 active followers who DON'T know would be career suicide.

No. 23481

File: 1547217854842.png (310.43 KB, 462x577, Screen Shot 2018-12-24 at 11.0…)

>>23477

Dif anon then who you were speaking to, but this is what Taylor looked like/shooped like when she met Tom. ( This is also the type of stuff she had posted of her on MC. ) … I also remember in a video him implying he missed her old (pic related) style.

>>23480

Oh, it would career suicide. It'd shatter her good girl image and bring heaps of attention to it. Better to leave it alone and make it look like wild rumours from the haters.

No. 23482

>>23480
>>23481
Normally I would agree with you but have you read PULL? Some of them are talking about making videos about this topic on YouTube. If this blows up, Taylor is screwed and it would be better to address and resolve everything beforehand. Taylor has some really obsessed people after her…

No. 23483

>>23482
None of them are actually going to do this. It gives them something to be outraged about. and yeah, Tom is sketchy as hell. But Taylor hasn't really done anything wrong aside from making stupid life choices (again and again). What it does affect is her former wholesome family-friendly image and the illusion of Tom as a hardworking good guy who would never exploit young girls. But both of those illusions were lies. She can create a new image for herself, or address the issue, or say nothing. She'll probably say nothing bc she knows it won't affect her at all.

No. 23484

>>23482
Not surprised….Kaka & Kota probably leader of the pack too.
I'm loving how 2 years ago, anons wished they had a dude like elbow-san, only to find out he's shady ass hell. Kek

No. 23485

>>23483
I am pretty sure they are going to make a video about MC because they already submitted a post on ONTD and interacted with Tom on Instagram. They are probably sending information to bigger drama channels right now.
Just look at SimplyKenna for example. One of those drama channels even confirmed that they were contacted by a PULL member (starts at 2:30). They are so obsessed over her and nitpicking everything 24/7. The same will happen to Taylor imo.

>>23484
Omg everything makes sense now kek

No. 23486

>>23459
tbh I can't make up my mind of how people on pull be like "OMGGG bet her mom IS disgusted by this,, tay i cant look at u the same anymore!!"
and think Tom hand picked the posts on the site… I honestly just think men are disgusting in general but I think they're overreacting because recently went to Japan and they will be xxx rated or sexy magazines on the magazine stand in the KOMBINIS or in news stand where children can look, etc and here people being SJW on a men's website (i'm not in favor of the child sexualizing thing but it doesn't come as shock to me) I just can't with the backlash Tay is getting, so dull

No. 23487

>>23486
lmao where I come from you can buy sexy magazines everywhere. leave your issues at home gurl

No. 23488

>>23486
Same anon. I don't know why this is a big deal to some anons. Who didn't know her boyfriend was shady?! Airhead Taylor is doing the right thing on not speaking about it. She probabl would've said something stupid like Tom.

No. 23489

>>23482
Where are they saying that? The only think I can find is someone asking if someone made a video about it yet

No. 23490

>>23489

>>The only think I can find is someone asking if someone made a video about it yet


Idk if you are stupid or a troll.

No. 23491

I think Taylor would be screwed if this blew up because that their ppl that have been implying she worked for MC as an escort and this is how she met Tom.

Personally I don't think Taylor deserves all this trying to destroy her. Sure she is a MooMoo but expose her creepy husband. He's the freak that had underage girls on his website that's clearly a catalog for escorts. But Taylor didn't do anything except gold dig which isnt a crime.

No. 23492

Do you remember how Taylor mentioned repeatedly that she and Tom met through a mutual friend? I'm pretty sure that this "friend" was Stephen Chau, the owner and CEO of Starz People. Several models associated with Starz People have been featured with exclusive Menclub interviews. Starz promoted these interviews on their instagram. Menclub featured a charity project run by Stephen Chau in 2016 and mentioned him & his company by name.

That's all to say that Taylor's boss (at the time) introduced her to another boss (Tom), ostensibly so that they could date.

I wonder who her old bf was (the one who worked in finance).

Anons once thought Stephen was Ta

No. 23493

>>23492
>That's all to say that Taylor's boss (at the time)
He wasn't her boss. If the dude owns Starz People and she's signed with them, he's her agent. If she was a booker who worked for him, then he'd be her boss.
But don't think that he's the "friend" anyway. Taylor said that Tom saw a photo-shoot she did on a mutual's fb and contacted the friend who gave him her professional info. Then, he contacted her agency Starz People who allowed her to be booked and work with Beauty Exchange.If Stephen was the friend, than why would he have had to call her agency at all.
I think given the BE stuff, and that make-up artists/hair stylists often post their work on social media, the friend was probably one of those two.

No. 30413

Fan theory (not serious, but think about it): Natalie has a crush on Taylor.
•Gets same hairstyle as Taylor's husband
•Touching Taylor's hair and clothes repeatedly
•Playful insults
•All Taylor's free time spent with Natalie

Also Natalie looks great with that hair I think(this is an imageboard.)

No. 30498

>>30413
this is so self-centered taylor lmao…

No. 30503

>>30498
The thread isn't in autosage anymore, don't necro it.

No. 34973

File: 1550226039714.png (1.34 MB, 750x1334, B1BF16BA-6B7A-4EB4-943D-ABAE5B…)

Is she for real

No. 34985

File: 1550242701981.jpg (10 KB, 221x287, CdJZUOhWEAAygSR.jpg)

>>34973
yikes

No. 34992

>>34973

Context? What's so "omg"?

No. 35011

File: 1550252280653.png (1.92 MB, 1440x2880, Screenshot_2019-02-15-11-45-42…)

>>34992
Apparently, spastic is considered to be very offensive term in the UK (similar to retard), while in the US, it's a neutral term for clumsiness. Didn't understand the issue either, had to learn this from Wikipedia.

No. 35053

>>35011
It’s actually offensive in Europe not only UK. I actually had to learn that it’s not offensive in the US

No. 35055

>>35053
Oh, ok, I didn't know that! I'm from northern Europe and only knew the US definition of the word before this.

No. 35062

>>34973
>>34985
getting offended over a word commonly used in the americas is pretty snowflakey

at least she apologized

No. 35086

>>35011
Yep I noticed she used that in an old video too. It's worse than calling someone a retard in the UK, seems bizarre that it's neutral in the US. spastic = spasm, spasmodic, implying disability

No. 35139

>>35086
I grew up in the US. It's hardly a neutral word. I don't understand everyone defending it. Just think about it…

No. 35145

>>35139
So did I and I've never seen or heard anyone get bent over the word "spastic". Usually it's shortened to just "spazz", but it's never been controversial here in America. Idk what you're talking about anon.

No. 36431

Has she ever commented on this instagrams pictures?

moose_ah7(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 36546


No. 36547

>>36546
Can sb post a summary pls?

No. 36550

>>22555
>>36547

It's basically just her debunking all the rumors about Tom being a pedo pimp lol

Just pointing out how the member's only part of MenClub just gives people access to events, not girls. Saying that she's never been an escort. The 'Schoolgirls We FXXED' article and the 13 yo bikini model articles weren't written by Tom, had no input by him, and that in the case of the 13 yo all the images were taken from her insta - so the magazine did not actually take lewds of a minor.

She goes through the articles and talks about how people jumped to conclusions because they can't read Chinese.

Talks about how all this happens just because people hate her and want to justify hating her.

No. 36551

>>36550
Such a lame excuse. Of course he’s not writing this shit but he’s the CEO so he has to stand up for what his employees do

No. 36552

>>36551

Yeah she basically just repeated that she's a good man blah blah blah, he has a staff of 100 people, he has nothing to do with what gets printed in the magazine

But like…

C'mon now. Surely he has something to say about provocative pics of a 13 yo being published on the site. I don't care if they're taken from her insta. You're still profiting from the sexualization of a minor.

Taylor, your pretty new apartment was bought with money earned from sick fucks clicking onto that site to see pics of a child in a bikini.

No. 36553

>>36550
This is not really everything she said. She explained well that the article about the “school girls” was just talking about why do men find attractive uniforms and such; and pointed out the model is 28-29 y/o. The articole about the 13 y/o girl was just an article to discuss the topic on very young models, and if it’s right or wrong. I personally don’t see anything different from those articles talking about the young, very sexualised, model from Brazil. There are plenty of articles showcasing her pictures, mainly because they want to shock you on how little clothes she wears for her age. I personally felt like this video was good, I don’t follow Tay as much as I used to do and lurking here and on pull didn’t helped. I feel like to really understand if she is just using the language to her advantage we should actually have someone that can translate it for good. I refuse to completely believe her but I feel like some points she made were good.

No. 36554

>>36550
>in the case of the 13 yo all the images were taken from her insta - so the magazine did not actually take lewds of a minor
They're still missing the point and playing dumb on purpose. Nobody was saying that they shot the pictures of that little girl themselves, it's the fact that she got posted on a magazine aimed to adult men that's disgusting.

No. 36558

>>36554
Uhm i believe her. I think that she's right. The video was very good and she adressed everything. I feel she just can't win with some of you, she said it herself. One thing is to criticize the content of the page and other is to call her husband a pedophile just to "expose her" and get to her. I'm surprised this thread hasn't being banned. Other threads have for less tinfoiling than this.

No. 36560

>>36551
I agree that he should stand up for that but some people in this thread made up ridiculous claims based only on that. How is a picture of someone else's instagram being on a website he owns makes him a pedophile?? And the escort thing??
This all just stinks of Kiki, idk why you are getting so defensive over it.

No. 36562

File: 1550593061906.gif (711.61 KB, 587x244, kiki luvs kiki.gif)


No. 36566

>>36546
She handled this so well. Honestly, people can fuck off with their blind hatred. It's so obvious people just want to get shit on her because they don't like Taylor. But don't realize that things like that can actually harm Taylor's marriage or even her husband's business. All of the Taylor threads so far seemed to just be the same people hating on her for fuckknows what reason.

No. 36578

>>36550
even if they’re not written by him, as the ceo of the website surely he would be wanting to make sure his website is the best possible respresentation of his business and he should at least be aware of what’s being posted

No. 36580

Tom went crazy defending the photos of the 13 year old model on Instagram so he did approve, but there were images of other underage girls besides the 13 year old and more sexually overt.

No. 36582

>>36580
Link?

No. 36584

>>36580
screenshots??

No. 36586

taylor needs this drama to resuscitate her dying channel

No. 36588

>>36546

Damn…

I'll be honest I don't like Taylor but I also don't hate her. I just find her really boring and vanilla. This video actually kinda makes me feel bad for her though, like no matter what she does the girls on PULL hate her. Like she came clean about her past and she seems very sincere and honest about this situation however, PULLtards just find something else to reach for. What I find funny though is that a lot of the girls on PULL claim to live in HK ( I recall some saying they might stalk her meet and greet to snap pictures of her ) and yet none of them translated any of the articles to see what they really were about.

>>36578

From what Taylor said in the video the titles were iffy but the subjects were usually about whether it's moral or why people found certain things like uniforms attractive. The article on the 13-year-old wasn't sexual and was comparing the girl to another young model in HK that got criticized for posting/taking similar pictures.

If Taylor is lying about any of the articles then someone should translate it for comparison. If there is evidence of other sketchy shit then anons should post the screen caps rather then making unproven claims.

No. 36589

Some of the other underage girls were already covered in the thread, like >>22890 Some of Tom's instagram comments were screencapped here, but I think the full version is on PULL.

It was either cleaned up or I saw a different Under 18 girl, but here's another. Under 18 "Rena":

https://menclub.hk/girls/17871

No. 36590

>>36589
i don’t speak cantonese so i’m willing to give tom the benefit of the doubt but i just wonder why they had to post like 10 photos of this girl. if they were trying to start a conversation about whether this is okay surely they would have posted like one, with a lot more text. this page is nearly all photos .. almost seems like they’re pandering to a certain type of audience

No. 36592

File: 1550600627224.jpeg (232.96 KB, 750x908, 8A0BCFD6-4B5B-408E-98BD-436855…)


No. 36593

>>36592
Sry hit the reply button too soon

No. 36599

>>36590
This under-18 girl is not the model Taylor said MC was supposedly trying to "start a conversation" about. I'm going to c/p the text just in case it disappears:

https://menclub.hk/girls/17871
18未滿「菜菜緒」2世 黑木麗奈

要介紹呢個「菜菜緒2世」黑木麗奈係咩人,當然要首先知道邊個係「菜菜緒」,簡啲黎講菜菜緒係日本一名出名嘅九頭身模特兒/演員,身高172cm,腿長85cm(日本腿長係計「股下高」,即係由褲浪底度起嘅腳內側長度),曾成為日本泳裝品牌「三愛水著樂園」嘅Image Girl」而知名。而黑木麗奈之所以被稱為「菜菜緒2世」,就係因為佢各方面都同菜菜緒頗為相似。

Looks like the video has been removed, but the page for the two sisters who were underage at the time of the photos posted earlier in the thread":

https://menclub.hk/girls/17989
日本最新姊妹丼 Erika、Marina!

有得揀,每個男人都希望可以左擁右抱,而你話有啲咩比起能夠同時得到一對姊妹花嘅垂青更令人興奮?就係得到一對又靚又吸引嘅姊妹花垂青——嗱日本近日就冒起咗一對符合以上條件嘅姊妹啦!

姊姊身材豐滿性感誘人,妹妹嬌小可愛潛力無限,真係唔知點揀好啦——如果有得揀嘅話。

The article with the 13 year old was already translated in this thread.

No. 36605

I think this is all just stupid and reachy, probably the result of jealousy, I feel bad for Taylor.

No. 36618

>>36599
Honestly, I'm not a Taylor Stan but this is a reach. Shit like this is posted on other websites and no one gets shit for it.
Like is anyone REALLY shocked that a website for men has lewd pictures of young girls that look older? Even then the girls are 18 and 15, not that young tbh.
Wow some men are creepy on the internet what a fucking shocker.

elbow-san needs better moderators, yeah, but this doesn't prove that Taylor is a prostitute/escort or is being sold or any dumb BS like that lol.

No. 36620

I personally dislike Taylor but this is a huge reach. Taylor and her husband are way too boring and normal for this kind of shit.

No. 36636

>>36546
Love how fast she scrolled past the Jemima pictures lmao. You can tell she is secretly ashamed and she should be.

No. 36648

>>36636
Beyond reaching. She's just scrolling naturally while explaining. In fact she pauses for longest on one of the more risque ones. What should she do, linger over each one?
She's not ashamed. She's upset because she and her friends have been constantly harassed by autists since December. Girl's at the end of her rope here.

No. 36654

>>36551
CEO has very little to do with daily runnings of business. He’s likely little to not involved at all in what articles are posted

No. 36657

I'm going to provide a more elaborate "transcript" so people who care know:
>addressing rumors posted about on drama forums and different websites. She says she knows its a particular person based off of their writing;grammatical errors and subject matter.
>went over the job her husband does at the magazine. Went on the site, said it's basically a men's forum coupled with online articles (like Sports Illustrated in USA, this is the equivalent in Hong Kong)
>Tom has 100 employees (aside from guests) and they all contribute to the site but Tom never actually posts
>goes on "Oh No They Didn't" livejournal article
>says the models underneath their respective page "wear what they like" and she could see how it's a little "risque" but that's what a men's magazine does for some model interviews
>addresses the "schoolgirls we fucked" article, said if you actually comprehend the article it's about a man's school girl outfit fantasy and not actually fucking minors. I guess the article (if I understood her reasoning right) had a poll on which outfit was more appealing and the editor said he liked the schoolgirl outfit fantasy because it brought him back to a age of purity and innocence, love and passion.
>The model in the article is named "Emma" and is around Taylor's age
>Private Room is basically a sign up where you can browse for workshops, social nights like whiskey nights.
>denies she was a prostitute. Said after she met Tom she did work with him doing clerical tasks but found out she didn't like working alongside him. Doesn't find anything wrong with supporting husband alongside his company.
>Jemima Robinson, 13 year old model: Taylor says her swimsuit pictures are not exclusive to the site but also on her instagram/portfolio. Said the article made a point on how another underaged model was criticized for posting risque photos by the Hong Kong Society but no one says anything about Jemima. They asked if it was a clash of culture to make this okay.
>said if there really was child porn or Tom was an actual pedophile, the accusers wouldn't just talk about it on the gossip sites. They should report it to the authorities.
>talked about a user who commented on every YT comment of one of her videos that referred to the ONTD article. Made the assumption it was either head curator or a user that wanted more traffic to the site
>user continues to sperge about how Tom took the time to hide the child pornography in different parts of the site
>not only did the sperge comment a ton on her YT channel, she said that this user commented on friend's YT channels. Sophie/peach milky messaged her at one point to ask what was going on
>Tom and Taylor have asked for actual proof but the sperges just link the ONTD article, not screens of actual concerns.

No. 36659

Nearly every single post:
>i feel bad for her
>reach
>you/pull will never stop
Okay…

>Even then the girls are 18 and 15, not that young tbh.

Then which age do you guys consider to be "young"? 10?
Is posting lewds of an 8yo-girl on a men's site "to discuss whether it's appropriate" okay as well?
Jesus.

No. 36683

>>36618
The Taylor escort conspiracy is far-fetched but she did lie about the nature of the underage material on MC's website in her video. It's just fapping material and if that embarrasses her, she should have left it alone.

Elbow is probably pissed he has to clean up his site for Taylor's fans now. I wonder how his staff feels about the wife.

No. 36686

File: 1550629798851.png (113.23 KB, 289x500, 3b0c8fbf.png)


No. 36705

>>36546
I'm really surprised she talked about it in a video, her views must be dropping and she needed the drama

No. 36707

>>36659
Taylor or fans are definitely in this thread, it doesn't really tally with the rest of the thread to suddenly claim it's all a reach when we reacted to it earlier very differently

No. 36724

Taylor is cancelled, it doesn't matter if the 13yo posted the photos herself, that is a men site and men will masturbate while looking at girls in bikini. They could have made their point without posting over 10 sexy photos in various thot attires.

No. 36726

If these people policing And moral gagging actually gave a shit about cp they would be raiding Instagram constantly

You only give a shit because you have some huge hate boner for Taylor

No. 36727

>>36726
Go away, I used to like Taylor and watched her videos, after this, she is dead to me, you can't excuse an article about school girls called GIRLS WE HAVE FUXXED and 13yo lewd posting. Watch her videos and go coddle her at Instagram.

No. 36729

>>36724
I know it doesn’t change anything but I’m thinking about how fucked up it it that parents actually allowed their 13 yo to do these pics? Ofc it’s nasty for MC to post these but they also just tookthem from Instagram…

No. 36730

>>36686
Wow I never thought they both talk publicly about this and eventually delete the article. I think it’s a good move.

No. 36731

After watching the video, it really amounts to her just scrolling through the site and saying it's all fine. Even if the "Schoolgirls we fxxed" article is retrospective, thinking about when the author was also a schoolboy, it is still an adult sexualizing a teenager in context. Loving her speedy scrolling past the lewd images too.

We have no proof that the "Private Room" is for wine-tasting or whatever Elbow claims it is, but it looks pretty suspicious to have a private area of the site for something innocuous, while "school girls we fxxxed" is a public article along with the now-removed 13 year old bikini modelling

I think she is adding more fuel to the fire here by bringing the topic to a much larger audience than it needed to be.
If someone was spamming her comments as it seems they were, that's harassment and she should have blocked them and threatened legal action. The fact is, nothing was slander. We are seeing the same thing anyone who visits the site sees and commenting on it. Whoever was harassing her was not right in doing that, but bringing this to a much larger audience as she's done now is questionable at best.

No. 36735

>>36727
Okay and how is them reposting the content any worse than the parents allowing their kids to model, the photographers and companies signing these kids up?

Like cool you think it’s wrong, why are you not going after the source

No. 36738

>>36735
Are you serious?

There are dozens of accounts of minors in bikinis, even celebrities post their babies and toddlers with their naked ass on Instagram. Those pics are ok for your private album but not on the internet for everyone to see. There are many sick minds who collect these.

It's about giving this 13 year old a platform on a mens website similar to Maxim. There half naked women and men fap to them and there's this 13 year old girl next to these women.
If her pictures were posted on a models site for example, it would be somewhat okay because clients need to see her measurements/body.

If the industry doesn't give a platform - there's zero demand and nearly no-one would exploit their children. But as long as the industry gives a platform like mensclub - there will be always exploitation.
And therefore people are attacking media outlets and shame them because there are thousands of disgusting parents who want to earn fast bucks with their children.

Do you understand now robot?

No. 36742

>>36738
as long as there is instagram there will be such pictures

No. 36745

>>36742
who the fuck is this apologist? this thread reeks of samefag.

>>36618
>not even that old
bitch, they’re u n d e r a g e. you sound like either you are too (because only a 15-18 year old would consider that age range “not that old” or mature in the slightest lol) or you have a thing for looking at little girls on the net. it’s people like you that help to perpetuate this culture. you have to hold everyone accountable. it’s not like you pick one to go after. it’s an epidemic of pedophiliac pandering and this is an example of it. he straight up admits he doesn’t see anything wrong with it in his post: >>36686


i know next to nothing about taylor i just popped in since it’s off autosage, but i’m shocked at some of these lukewarm ass responses to a 13-year-old child being labeled “FXXKED” by grown men. these are clearly not localized farmers. what gives

No. 36746

>>36745
fuck, so angry i forgot to sage and also i meant
>not even that young
apologies

No. 36750

>>36745
This.

People, stop defending a fucking pedo and his enabler Taylor. He even said that he doesn't think that anything is wrong with posting a half naked 13 year old on his website. He only deleted it because he got a shitstorm. There's still a 14 year old on his page. I'll tell you that he only cares about his image. Plus Taylor has a full closet of uguu kawaii toddler clothing which Tom loves so much. Totally normal kek

I also read some comments under her video and I think either her viewers are all 12 year olds or indeed bots. All negative comments are deleted within an hour.
One of them wrote that if it were illegal, than they should have called the police but they didn't care so it's totally legal and fine.
That's the way pedophiles argue. They collect books, photos and paintings of underage naked or half naked boys and girls because it isn't illegal to own them. ~call the Police if you think this is illegal kek

>>36560
>>36562
No, these people are not Kiki but have common sense unlike you. I hope that Kiki aka spergchan reappears and buys lots of bot comments like Taylor did. I have literally no fucking sympathy with enablers like Taylor and her pedo husband Tom.

No. 36751

>>36731
>After watching the video, it really amounts to her just scrolling through the site and saying it's all fine. Even if the "Schoolgirls we fxxed" article is retrospective, thinking about when the author was also a schoolboy, it is still an adult sexualizing a teenager in context. Loving her speedy scrolling past the lewd images too.

It really doesn't. She pretty carefully went through all of the claims made in the article and addressed them thoroughly.

>We have no proof that the "Private Room" is for wine-tasting or whatever Elbow claims it is, but it looks pretty suspicious to have a private area of the site for something innocuous, while "school girls we fxxxed" is a public article along with the now-removed 13 year old bikini modelling


We also have no proof that it isn't for wine tasting. But she has pictures from the events that she showed in the video and you don't have any proof whatsoever, pictures or otherwise.
The "School girls we fucked" article was explained. Imo it's a stupid explanation and Tom should fire the idiot who thought that was a good title for an article that basically amounted to pseudo-intellectual musings.

Posting the 13 year old was a monumentally bad editorial decision. Shouldn't have happened and should have been removed immediately. That being said, all of the pictures from that article can be found on fucking google images. You don't even have to go to her instagram.

No. 36753

>>36751
>Posting the 13 year old was a monumentally bad editorial decision.

Urm no. It’s literally sexualising a minor.

No. 36754

>>36753
Where did I say that it wasn't? I'm saying that sexualizing of a minor is why it was a monumentally bad editorial decision.

No. 36755

>>36654
A CEO should know what is going on with his company as he is the most responsible. That’s why they are paid so much.

No. 36756

>>36751
>That being said, all of the pictures from that article can be found on fucking google images. You don't even have to go to her instagram.

Guess what you can find on google too? Naked kids and disgusting other things. But it's your decision to post it on your site and to promote it. Tom has decided to promote a half naked underraged girl on his site for men, so he thinks presenting half naked minors to other men and sexualising them are ok. His doings fall into a grey zone and the fact that Taylor said that they should call the Police if they think that's illegal, makes me 100% sure that he is sick. That's literal 101 pedo tactics. They know what they can do and what not. Shame on you for defending them!

No. 36758

>>36754
You’re downplaying it trying to defend her and her pedo husband.

No. 36759

>>36756
>Shame on you for defending them!
Go fuck yourself. I'm doing nothing of the sort. I clearly said that it shouldn't have been posted and should have been taken down immediately.

>>36758
I'm not trying to downplay it.

No. 36761

>>36759
Kek go to your pedo friends. This world would be a better place without enablers like you.

No. 36767

>>36761
>>36763
Care to explain how you massive sperg.

No. 36776

>>36592
She deleted her statement wow I wonder if they generally spoke to a lawyer about this?

No. 36781

people calling out the site for being shady shouldn’t have used terms as serious as “porn”, “prostitution”, “sex work”, anything like that especially when talking about minors, without some serious undeniable proof. it’s easy for taylor to say “it’s nothing to do with sex work”, it’s harder for her to say “there’s nothing wrong with the site” because you can clearly see the shady parts of it. even her video doesn’t really have her completely saying the site is fine - she can’t, she knows the issues with minors aren’t okay - but she just tells the (probable) truth that it isn’t about actual porn and isn’t about sex work

No. 36791

>>36781
Exactly. Site has some really skeevy content. Anyone with eyes can see that but it's legal. Not grey area legal, but legal legal. But it's definitely distasteful and for me at least totally gross.
>>36782
She met him when he contacted her to work for Beauty Exchange in 2012 before Menclub was even live. Then he contacted her agency to make it official. The first video that she did in collaboration with BE was the Sailor Moon hairstyle video. It's posted upthread.

No. 36810

>>36781
this is the issue with people who are so blinded with hate for taylor that they can't even properly articulate the things that are wrong with her or the website. they throw out every misconceived accusation they can think of then get confused why people don't believe them when it comes to the ACTUAL issues. dog cried wolf gone autistic farming.

No. 36811

>>36727
>after this, she is dead to me

Holy shit, this thread is even more autistic than Shayna's and pnp's. It's pretty clear that the massive hate boners have sucked all blood from some of your brains.

The anon(s?) accusing Tom of being a pedo and Taylor of being an ex prostitute are going ham, I kind of worry for their mental state. Some of the articles on the site are gross and questionable, but that's pretty much all there is to it.

No. 36823

ITT: kiki is given new life blood

No. 36851

I have a simple question:

Why are people reeeeeing at Onision if minors upload their bodies to his forum but it's totally okay if Tom displays half naked minors on his website?

Because here are people arguing that you can find these pics on insta and google, so it's legal. But it only applies for Tom right? Any other man who does this is a pedo like Onision, right?

I hope you see your fucking flaws in your logic. Onision is a scumbag, pedo and predator and we know that because he shares a lot of his life online. Tom on the other hand shows like 1% of his life but is held on a different standard. He sexualized a minor and he saw nothing wrong with it. With such morals, guess what the other 99% of his life might be…

No. 36853

>>36848
Learn to sage and try a better bait next time TayTay

No. 36858

>>36851
the difference is tom didnt write the article, one of his 100 employees did

No. 36861

>>36851
Because the sperg who's whiteknighting Tom is the same person spamming the thread with weak excuses. Whoever it is, doesn't care about logic.

No. 36868

>>36853
nta but can you please stop sperging out and accusing everyone who has a different (albeit gross) opinion then you of being her or an enabler. It's so fucking tiresome and doesn't add to the conversation at all.
Anyway, Taylor doesn't read manga (or anything else) so I doubt she'd make a reference like that.

No. 36909

File: 1550725063335.png (555.36 KB, 1280x720, Identical.png)

The line of "it's not illegal so it's ok" is interesting. There's so many things that are not illegal but are still awful. It's no excuse.

Anyway I watched her recent videos and my favorite part was when she showed two completely different cards her and tom bought separately for her friend's wedding, and said it was proof they were "so similar".

I also think it's obnoxious to go extra light blonde for the wedding, she stands out so much against all the brunettes and it looks like it's her own wedding in half the pictures. She claims she was going to go back brunette but the hairdresser took too long, but the first stage was lightening the roots which is not what you do when you're trying to go darker. She seems to constantly lie about things that don't matter, it's strange.

No. 36910

File: 1550725351580.png (935.52 KB, 720x721, Here comes the bride.png)

>>36909
Wedding pics from Instagram

No. 36912

File: 1550725557562.png (715.95 KB, 720x712, Wedding.png)


No. 36927

I just checked for new comments on her "coming clean" video. There was a comment she liked about six hours ago and all the comments before that time are all 100% positive. The comments that are more recent than 6 hours since she liked that comment are about 50/50 positive versus negative. It's sad how much effort she's putting into making it look like everyone's okay with this. A lot of the comments are even nice about it but just stating it's not right even if it's legal.

No. 36938

>>36909
she didn´t want to be super blonde for the wedding but get out the patchy pink from her dying her hair by herself.
Also she was never brunette, it was always a warm toned golden blonde

No. 36947

>>36826

Not the anon you were responding to, but it kinda is. I get the vibe he doesn't manually do any of the overseeing for anything that gets posted on his site. No doubt he has someone hired to do that work and that person gave those articles a stamp of approval. Since it's considered legal it was never probably brought to Tom's attention by any of his staff. Also, claiming Tom is a pedophile would mean he is sexually attracted to children which I highly doubt. I also highly doubt Taylor is even in the know with anything going on, and being married to him doesn't mean she monitors everything. The man owns several companies. She's probably more in tune with BE ( Beauty exchange ) than his other businesses. 70% of Mensclub has nothing to do with women or sex. Maybe calling Tom lazy or careless would be more fitting than calling him a pedophile.

I understand some of you anons points, but I also see the blind hatred you have for Taylor.

>>36851

Onision and Lainey are directly involved and actively seeking young women to fuck. Tom isn't hunting young girls to fuck or look at even, and Taylor is the living embodiment of dumb blonde. The only things Taylor claims to have actually read are shitty books that get her trendy points. At worse, Tom is an enabler and at best he is a lazy/crappy CEO. It's evident he puts more work into Beauty Exchange.

No. 36963

>tfw anons legitimately try to pull any and all excuses out of their asses that the man who is a CEO of this company has nothing at all to do with the models used in the magazines, yet claim they aren't stans of Tay fucking kek.
>not proven he is attracted to underage models
>his whole schtick has been "youthful" (read teen like) and straight up underage models used several times.
>has the weakest most autistic response on his IG where he says content might be morally questioning because its aimed at men which should clue you in that the dude is just another gross panderer who knows what he is doing is going through loopholes and breaking laws that he gets away with because of ppl like the anons who find anything to deflect and push blame away.

No. 36977

>>36912
Well of course she did that! So foreign, so kawaii!! She'll never claim her real color is brunette (though it is). That is also extra-special blonde!

No. 36982

Nobody cares about a 13 year old in a swim suit as long it is in a catalog or modelling map.
But showcasing a 13 year old in a mens magazine is something different. China has very little human rights and even less child protection laws. Only because it's legal there, doesn't mean it's ok. Tom would have been cancelled the minute this shit was public here in North America, Europe or Australia. He's very lucky that his magazine with his under 18 section is in Chinese.

No. 36984

>>36963
>being so far up your own ass you see criminal activity in everything
you should be a detective!

No. 36993

>>36963

Oh, and you have solid evidence besides the argument " He owns the site". A lot of large social media companies face backlash due to some skeevy shit one of their employees posted or did. Like the clothing brand that had a black child as a monkey theme that blew up a while ago. Shit slips through the cracks. When it comes to that 13 yr old he had the article removed, and had even stated if there were any other articles to inform him. To me that says he doesn't oversee all publications and does have someone hired on to generally do that. You're treating this like its a blog and he writes and creates everything.

CEO's care more about seeing the numbers and results than doing their workers work for them and reading over the articles. Sorry, they hire people to do that. Him dating Taylor before and even during her dolly phase doesn't equate to being sexually attracted to children either.

No. 37014

>>36982
Who said anything about a physical magazine? Theirs is only on a website

The ones with 13 year olds on magazines unrelated to fashion/modeling is japan with manga. If anything you’re proving what Tom does was okay but demonizing the Japanese for a well known industry tactic to sell manga by using tits

No. 37025

>>37014
This is the most autistic thing I've ever read. Literally nothing make sense because obviously anon meant online catalog and even then what have Japan and manga culture to do with this discussion? We're talking about real people and not some hentai shit. If you can't contribute to a logic discussion, then pls stop sperging. You're probably the one who posted a minor in a bikini here for whatever reason.

No. 37042

>>37025
>anon meant online catalog

no, pretty sure they're trying to equate a fucking blog to a physical print magazine but nice backtracking.

>real people and not some hentai shit


and im talking about the big problem with companies using UNDERAGE REAL FUCKING KIDS as a selling point to sell more magazines. dont be retarded just bc youre uneducated anon.

No. 37055

MC's girls section isn't blog-only. They also have exclusive photo and video. I don't think any of the girls in their videos have been underage, although some videos have been deleted, but it's not true that they just have some staff members repost content from other places. It seems they travel to Japan to film some of the Japanese women so it's not a tiny production and unlikely Tom isn't involved at some level.

No. 37062

>>36993
He defended that article since December and only now had it taken down, while saying he personally thinks it's not pedophilic to wank to a 13yo if they look like an "attractive, mature woman" or whatever the fuck he wrote. It was sickening. He took down the article because he and Taylor are sick of hearing about it. They are worried about their businesses and brand. They have no moral issues whatsoever with it.

Taylor lied several times in the MC video about her involvement with MC and the lack of other underage girls on the site.

This isn't one little article. It's a whole bunch of gross stuff. Tom sits on instagram everyday interacting with Taylor's underage fans. It makes me furious that his attitudes about girls being used and exploited are being normalized. It's not normal. It's not OK. And he had the power to stop it. He chose not to. He chose to make money instead.

No. 37073

>>37062

>>While saying he personally thinks it's not pedophilic to wank to a 13yr


Whew, lad, those are the kinda words that can get ya sued for slander. Never once did he ever say anything about masturbating to teens being ok regardless of looks. The article wasn't even about sex and came off more as "shock value". I also doubt Menclub makes anywhere near Beauty Exchange as the site only has 100 employees. They wouldn't be facing that much loss of income.

Again, I highly doubt before the sperging that Taylor even knew. I can't see her sitting there read and skimming every shit article in the girl's section of his site. I couldn't even find the article while still up.

No. 37086

>>37073
If they wanted to sue, they would have already done it. Look at her video: she's giving slight hints about it if they don't stop, they will take action.
Under Canadian law Tom is screwed because 13 year olds don't belong to a mens magazine. Under Chinese law he would have a case since it's legal but it would lead to nowhere because of the language barrier and because their legal system sucks. China doesn't even have proper human rights. So Taylor has to threaten them.
I agree saying he's a pedo is a stretch but if this issue goes beyond her fanbase, nobody is going to be on his site. I only see 12 year olds defending them but adults are disgusted. And that's the reason why she made a video about it, because it's the only way to threaten people and get these rumours out of his way. She even deleted a comment because she's scared that it will be held against her.

No. 37099

File: 1550827269119.png (118.53 KB, 435x500, 52850027_352357968824127_60107…)

>>37062
>>37073
OK, I messed up. I thought Tom wrote the attached comment. There's something Tom-ish about the syntax. But now that I look at it, I guess the name would not have been erased if it had been him. (I had assumed the line about being so helpful & translating the article was sarcasm.) Comment has been deleted, it seems. It's still repulsive.

I stand by what I said about Tom defending this article since December. He has. He's still defending it now. At least two other underage articles have been found (one 14 at the time of posting). Those are still up, as far as I know.

No. 37102

>>37086
There is very little that can be done legally, especially given that Tom's business is in HK. The basic outrage about MC's exploitation of underage girls and general seedy content is not defamatory. It is true.

People should stop saying Tom is a pedo and runs a prostitution ring and Taylor is a prostitute. Those things are unfounded and could perhaps eventually be considered libel. I don't know why people are compelled to say things like that when the reality is sordid enough.

The private room area is still sketchy. I'd like it if someone could join and find out for real what that is for. Why do you need to put your salary in there for a latte class? But we have no proof that it is about sex and so it is stupid to make assumptions about that.

No. 37106


No. 37114

>>37104
There's another 13 year old MC posted and the pictures don't look as tame as this one. Pull posted them on Taylors video thread.
I just hope Tom and Taylor get their shit together and sincerely apologize and delete ALL blog posts with underaged girls instead of making everything about themselves and what poor victims they are. Otherwise Pull is digging deeper and finding more stuff until a big drama channel is reporting about this mess. SJW people are going to flood her channel and then she can say goodbye to her image. I can literally smell this coming

No. 37115

>>37114
I still can't believe she posted a video about it. How did that help at all? Has her image improved? It seems she's been busy deleting comments on the video to try and change public opinion. All she did was increase the number of people who know about this issue. I can see it snowballing.

No. 37119

File: 1550839857648.jpg (84.24 KB, 867x471, horn dogs.jpg)

>>36546

This video is going really well

No. 37121

File: 1550841040092.jpg (73.4 KB, 679x328, unsub.jpg)

>>37119

Most of the comments are saying the same things; schoolgirl uniforms are skeevy, 13 year olds in bikinis is wrong, sexualizing teens is wrong, but just capped the top one here because it's interesting s/he noticed how unnecessary this video was

No. 37122

>>37115
I thought her video was a smart move bc she is the first one to tell the world. She is basically pushing the narrative away from minors being sexualized to victimizing herself and Tom. The video is about bad haters trying to destroy hardworking Taylor and Tom. It is well done overall. Now it is really hard for another person to win the public since this person will be stigmatized as a hater, even though he/she is telling the truth. It needs a bigger drama channel and really good objective documentation to prove Taylor wrong. Maybe she's lucky and nothing will happen. I don't think Tom and Taylor are bad people but they are playing with fire.

No. 37125

>>37122
It was a response to ONTD, she even mentions that.

No. 37127

>>37104
>少女
Girl

No. 37133

>>37125
But it was indeed the first video about this topic. Most people didn't even know about ONTD

>>37073
Nobody is going to sue anyone here. Can you pls stop with this? That's an anonymous forum and you can discuss and share your opinion. It's even necassary to discuss bc it's an important issue. I also thought it was pedo shit but after some anons told me that it was okay in China, I changed my mind. Only because it is not okay here, doesn't mean it's the same in another country. Still, I think minors don't belong in a mens magazine. Now the real problem is that some people break rules and make accusations outside of forums. I don't believe it was a farmer but rather a Pull member. Whatever, they have the same rule. NEVER EVER intervene with a cows life which some of them did and now they are in trouble like this Mariska chick. Plus this ONTD article was never a good idea to begin with.

No. 37136

>>37133
>I also thought it was pedo shit but after some anons told me that it was okay in China, I changed my mind. Only because it is not okay here, doesn't mean it's the same in another country.

Is this (brilliant) parody? "after some anons told me that it was okay in China, I changed my mind." Yo anon, if a woman wants to be a police officer in Indonesia, she has to undergo a "virginity test." Is that suddenly OK with you, too?

No. 37137

>>37104
Literally only a pedo or a blind Tay-stan would defend this.
It's creepy and sketchy as fuck, period. I have nothing against Taylor, but her husband is trash. Being related to a "wholesome" youtuber doesn't make you exempt from criticism.
>inb4 the whiteknight starts tossing around the buzzwords "reach", "blind hatred" and "Kiki" again

No. 37143

>>37138
This one is 12/13.(do not post pictures of minors)

No. 37157

>>37136
>>37148
>Is this parody?
I thought it was obvious

No. 37161

>>37138
>>37144
Haven't been to this thread in a while but this is getting stranger and stranger..

Does he not read his own website or what is posted there? I think it's only the spergs who are outright calling him a pedophile. But there is still something wrong with him and his views.

>>36686
His statements about it are still suspicious.
>It's for men
>So it might have crossed moral standards
Uh what?
>I found nothing wrong with the content

These are his own words, guys.
Men are trash, but we know this already. Elbow san is no exception. It's unfortunate for her to have married someone like this. But she knew about this website all along. I honestly don't know what to think about her exactly.

No. 37162

>>37138
>>37104
>>37144

Are these girls posted right alongside the porn stars and gravure models? Like what category are they in.

>>37148


Age of consent in Canada is 16. ( Believe it was 14 before 2008 ) With the rule of it being the partner has to be within 5 years older.

( Honestly fucking think it should be 18 )


>>37161

I was one of the anons defending Taylor and somewhat Tom. I don't think Taylor really knew about this stuff that was going on until it blew up. She's obviously going to defend Tom as that's her husband and livelihood/lifestyle. Her image is also now tied into his and likewise. Taylor is vain and that's about it, everything she does is for the sake of her image.

In regard to Tom though, I don't think he's a pedophile, and I don't think he truly reviews all that much on his site. His focus is more on Beauty exchange as that's where most of his income is from. However, he is shady for finally reviewing the stuff and saying nothing is wrong. His actions speak louder than words though. If he truly knew nothing was wrong with the article, he would have never removed it from his site.

No. 37207

>>37138
>posting 13 year old tits

Lmao yeah demonize the guy for posting it on his site, but you’re not a pedo for posting those same tits on here? Fucking Hypocrite

No. 37228

In the era of #MeToo, how can she possibly defend the fact that her husband runs a men's rag that essentially panders to traditional misogynistic male "lifestyle" beliefs just like Maxim, Playboy etc. It doesn't even NEED to be explicitly pornographic, that's not the point. He's just another old pig who bought himself a young hot wife who defends him while he profits off the exploitation of girls because that's exactly how he believes the world should work. They are both reactionaries. Imagine the kind of daughter these two will raise. Or worse – son.

No. 37250

File: 1550904096497.png (110.92 KB, 333x428, menclub.png)

This is a screenshot of a video greeting she made for MenClub in 2013

No. 37251

File: 1550904127398.png (103.11 KB, 240x425, menclub2.png)


No. 37265

>>37250
I can’t point out what looks so different here. Is it just her make up?

No. 37272

>>37133
Agreed, going around commenting all over her Youtube is cowtipping extreme. PULL users are such dumbasses

No. 37273

>>37265
Bigger nose, bigger chin, no cheek filler. She has botox forehead now (watch her eyebrows, they barely move) and the hair strands™ are to cover her variable cheek size in photos and film. In the beginning of Jan 2019 in her fitness video she looks more like her sister, as her cheek fillers had dissolved over the December break.

No idea when she got the chin and nose done, as I only followed her recently, but some of her older videos her nose seems larger. I suspect her chin was done before her first Youtube video was posted.
Her baby will be a surprise appearance I guess, though I don't think accepting the sexualizing of teenagers on your husbands website, and being a mommy, goes hand in hand so hopefully no pregnancy until she matures in a few years.

No. 37292

>>37273
I think all she got was botox and fillers. I thought for a while she also got lip injections but it´s just her weird way of overdrawing I guess

No. 37445

Samefag as a post above wondering why she did it: Now at 380,000 views with plenty of top comments and replies saying it's skeevy, I'm now thinking she posted this video as a passive-aggressive way of trying to get Tom to change his site.
My clue is that she got a red rash on her chest, which, blogpost, happened to me once after confronting my dickhead housemate who blocked me from using the kitchen for months and took over the living room. I was moving so I could finally mention it, he started the altercation by complaining I was blocking the kitchen with my bags of clothes and stuff (the irony!)

But it made me think this is about confronting a guy and not the girls online. In her live she says she has a thick skin in regard to criticism due to years of modelling and online comments.

Sage for tinfoil

No. 37447

File: 1550992924558.png (121.3 KB, 720x330, Talk to him.png)

>>37445
Oh also she edited the video description to say this:

No. 37466

Apologies for any files deleted earlier. It won't be happening anymore since we're transitioning between the old and new rules.
*Do not make threads on subjects under the age of 16.
-Do not post identifiable information on minors such as full names, addresses and schools.
-Do not post photos of minors where there is an expectation of privacy.
* Any bans will be reversed and you are free to re-post caps. There is no expectation of privacy through public social media photos.

No. 37506

>>37447

This is disappointing to read.
Honestly, it reads like she just simply doesn't give 2 shits. The only reason Tom took the young girls article down is due to Taylor hounding him about it and it finally reached a news site. People have tried speaking to Tom in which he just brushes it off as " it's not illegal soo…" Those fancy houses and cars Taylor likes to take pictures in and brag about are partially paid for by those skeevy articles.

With Taylor wanting to have kids at some point soon, how can she not think of this from a concerned mothers standpoint? That's someone's little girl being posted on a grown man's site right next to poor stars and gravure models. It's not illegal but it sure as fuck is tasteless and questionable.

No. 37513

>>37447
Yeah, "talk to him" so that he can play dumb and say he doesn't know what you're talking about and to "stop telling lies" like he did when people asked him on instagram.
I get wanting to protect your business, but in this case the right thing to do would be apologize and delete ALL the stuff involving little girls on your website. And yeah, pretend you didn't know about it too to clean your image, and even better, claim that the person who posted those articles isn't working with you anymore.
Defending the pedo content on your website to the very end just because "it's not illegal soooo" seems a bad business move and I hope it backfires greatly.

No. 37573

>>37447
tbh Tom actually should have been the one addressing this issue, not Taylor.

No. 37617

>>37506
As if Taylor wouldn't try to monetize her half-Asian kids with modeling or TV. If she's not bothered by it now, she won't be when it's her own kids.

No. 37659

her new video doesn’t make it better anyway! can she just stop finding excuses?

No. 37672

I liked how she made her point more clear in the latest video. She distanced herself from MC and pointed out that I no way she supports underage girls in sexy pictures on mens websites

No. 37698

>>37672
That doesn't make it any better that she's living like a princess off MC using sexy pics of underaged girls on their website. Tay knew about MC since she started dating Tom, and she chose the money & lifestyle over her false morals. She only gives a fuck now that it punches a massive hole in her sweet, innocent persona.

No. 37701

What was the video Taylor deleted on Feb 18? What's going on with her subscriber count? She's been getting a steady 700-1000+ new subscribers a day for months despite lack of uploads, but the fewer the views, the far more subscribers per views she gets. Feb 13, she had 1,048 new subscribers for 121,780 views, but Feb 19 was 944 subscribers for 278,751 views. No new video on Feb 13 unless it was the one that was deleted. Feb 19 was a day after her friend's wedding and moving video.

No. 37702

December: 4.61 million views but only 8.87K subscribers. November: 2.4 million views / 7.37 subscribers. January: 2.83 million / 9.85 subscribers.

No. 37712

Wow, I'm shocked Taylor actually made a video about the Mens Club scandals. I am one of the people who translated several Mens Club articles for Chinese for this board – specifically, I translated the one about the 13 year old Australian girl and the description of the "Private Room" section of the website.

Her and Elbow-san's responses are absolutely infuriating. ES directly says on IG that he sees nothing wrong with the article sexualizing a 13 year old. They both try to play the "Our haters just ~can't read Chinese~ so they don't understand the point of the article about the 13 year old girl in a bikini". No. The article is blatantly discussing the 13 year old, her figure and looks. It does mention in one sentence how an underaged Hong Kong pop idol took similar photos and was criticized for them. But the whole point of the "article" (which was 90% photographs, 10% article) was sexualizing the girl.


As for the "Private Men's Club", it asked for yearly income and such. My guess is that it is not so much an explicit "prostitution ring", but more of a sugar-baby mixer type thing. Taylor can say they're not running a brothel because that is true. But nobody joins an elite club with income requirements just to sit around drinking whiskey with other men. Honestly anyone who understands East Asian nightlife and business would understand this. Women for sale are just a regular part and parcel of the experience.


It's ironic because the MORE you can understand Chinese language/culture, the more you realize just how sketchy this all is.

I'll watch Tay's second "justification" video but my expectations are lower than the age of the Mens Club girls at the moment.

Taylor has to stand by her man obviously, but the reality is that they are engaged in some sketchy exploitative activities. It all makes me so sad because I was a huge fan for a long time. No longer. Defending the MC scandal made me lose all respect for them.

PS: I don't doubt that ES has hired a PR firm to astroturf this issue (including on lolcow). This thread is suddenly flooded with MC defenders. Highly suspicious.

No. 37717

>>37712
I personally don't believe Taylor married ES without fully knowing about MC. I think she was willing to look the other way for the life she wanted & now she's trying to do damage control after 6-7 years of buying trendy stuff to stay relevant while ES makes profits off sexualising young girls.

No. 37724

>>37712
Thank you so much for your translations! I'm really grateful that we could read accurate translations instead of google translate garbage.

No. 37727

>>37717
She definitely knew what MC was about. Why else did she post "cute but suggestive" photos on her old website and FB? She left up all the pervy comments she used to get, too.

She used to post "bedtime pics" with full makeup and contact lenses, in cute pyjamas, with titles "good night xoxo" - I mean, it's just clear to me who those pictures were for. They were meant - like Dakota's suggestive pictures - to appeal to men. Both tried to depict themselves as jailbait.

Taylor's Menclub "christmas goddess" video has been deleted (only screenshots from it exist), but you can see what kind of videos the other christmas goddesses did in 2013 by searching MenClub聖誕女神特輯 - they are all a mixture of slightly childish (partially has to do with the music & the toys they are fondling) and sexy leg/cleavage shots:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk1WLEDedtE [DL][Archived Copy]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fwg4QCmKMMw [DL][Archived Copy]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kz8MMmU3-I

I'm sure there were more videos than just these but these are all I can find.

No. 37728

>>37672
Same honestly.
This was a much better video than the last one. She explained it pretty well while also acknowledging that it wasn't ok and that Tom as the head of the company needed to have better oversight when it comes to content. It seems she understood why people were upset and that the first video wasn't enough.
But mostly I was pleased to hear that MC is going to only post girls over 18 from now on and that Tom would pay closer attention.
I hope they stick to that.
But I still think he should go back with a fine-toothed comb and remove any other articles featuring underage girls.

No. 37729

>>37726
>>37727
It's a Christmas shoot. They are fiddling with Christmas decorations while Christmas music plays. There are a couple leg shots but it's really mild for the most part.
And it doesn't seem childish at all.
I just think it's pretty standard men's mag holiday fare.

No. 37730

>>37729
Yeah, I've seen worse - actually, I've seen Taylor do worse than these videos. My point is that Taylor made one of these, too. She knew what the mag was about.

No. 37734

>>37672
It was indeed more genuine and honest. Good for her. Everyone deserves a second chance.

No. 37741

>>37730
>>37730
>actually, I've seen Taylor do worse than these videos
Really? Can you post screenshots at least when you make that claim. Imageboard and all.
Look, I dislike Taylor(a lot for a host of reasons) but she has never worn anything remotely as revealing as what those girls are wearing (which still isn't really revealing at all) but Taylor was always fully clothed in comparatively conservative clothing.
>My point is that Taylor made one of these, too. She knew what the mag was about.
It's a men's magazine/platform. She's not denying that.

No. 37753

>>37741
In the case of trying to appeal to men by acting more childish/youthful, exposed skin means Jack shit. Older women pretending to be younger intentionally cover more and wear bigger clothes, like young girls who aren't thots do. Taylor is pushing 30 and still acting 16, and not because it's just her personality- she was a normal looking woman when she modeled for Lancome, even with the circle lenses. Taylor didn't start acting kawaii and innocent until Dakota went viral for the same thing and got signed to Bravo, so Taylor adopted the same "innocent pedobait weeaboo" gimmick to get attention and it worked- she landed Tom. He even said he was initially attracted to her for her "personality", and since they married Taylor dropped most of the kawaii uguu teen ageplayer stuff and looks more like a grown woman.

No. 37754

>>37753
>Taylor didn't start acting kawaii and innocent until Dakota went viral for the same thing and got signed to Bravo

I mean she didn't start dressing kawaii and innocent until Dakota went viral for it, my bad.

No. 37785

>>37768
Can not somebody just register and find out what’s behind this?

No. 37786

I found the vlog with venus pretty interesting. She actually confessed that Taylor wanted to be like Venus way back when. Idk i found that crazy! She also said that venus is like her little sister which i kinda found sweet

No. 37792

>>37785
Who the hell not only lurks lolcow, but is fluent in Cantonese(?) and is both willing and able to prove an income worthy of entering? If such a farmer even existed, they probably wouldn't do that with the intention of doing harm to Taylor or Tom or Mensclub.

No. 37793

>>37786
Venus is an even bigger pedobait ageplayer than Taylor tried to be so I believe that 1000%.

No. 37811

File: 1551185963203.jpg (27.6 KB, 480x640, 10255928_644954875554063_35514…)

>>37741
As you said, they aren't wearing revealing clothing. That's more or less true. But Taylor's done plenty of selfies directed at men.
>>22903 is one: this isn't modeling, or a normal photo a woman would choose to take. Tom probably took it; they were dating during this time.

She was 26 in the attached photo.

I cannot prove "oh, she took this to deliberately look both childish & sexy and get men to fantasize about her" but one does get that feeling from her early pics.

No. 37812

File: 1551186113300.jpg (27.68 KB, 480x640, 10308392_645020165547534_59195…)

>>37811
She is entitled to take whatever pics she wants to take. But I don't think she was unaware of the image she was projecting here. And these aren't private pics for a boyfriend or for a modeling shoot, they were taken by her or Tom and posted to her FB page.

No. 37813

File: 1551186210513.jpg (52.69 KB, 642x856, 10154351_631488110234073_82757…)

>>37811
These pics were also reposted on a number of forums.

No. 37814

File: 1551186360300.jpg (92.07 KB, 640x640, 10445_599162713466613_43712036…)

>>37811
The caption on this one:
"Thank you my dear fans ❤️ love to see your letters & pictures (^_^)"

I mean, I honestly don't believe Taylor was an escort or paid girlfriend. But what is this? It's clearly not for her kid fans. It's just weird.

No. 37815

NOTICE

Thread has reached 1100 posts. The thread will be locked and you will be unable to post in it shortly after it exceeds 1200 posts. Please begin preparing a new thread and post a link to it when it's created.

No. 37816

File: 1551186477425.jpg (84.64 KB, 640x640, 1426316_584242681625283_201972…)

>>37811
This was the one I originally thought of when I posted before. Is it necessary to hold the potato right over your crotch?

No. 37817

File: 1551186536614.jpg (64.08 KB, 681x960, 547801_586594138056804_8316807…)

>>37811
Ready for bed in my circle lenses and makeup~~

No. 37818

File: 1551186593196.jpg (46.69 KB, 640x640, 1501741_586904711359080_382056…)

>>37811
Is she wearing shorts? who knows

No. 37824

File: 1551191299334.png (57.3 KB, 665x472, playboy.png)

I go to start watching the new video and guess what my first ad is.

No. 37833

>>37831
This doesn't prove that the private room is a dating platform.

No. 37841

>>37839
It's a press release, so not really internal.

It just says that they are partnering with this other service. I don't think it's enough proof, sorry.

I'm 100% sure there's something weird/gross about the Private Room, but I'm not willing to declare this is confirmation of anything, because it isn't.

No. 37849

>>37813
Ew wtf it looks like she has three arms lmao

No. 37861

>>37845
Nope, I can google though. https://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/announcements.do?by=asxCode&asxCode=ERR&timeframe=Y&year=2015
That document, and a lot like it, are publicly published here.

"Personal Use" does not mean "Confidential" or "Internal"

No. 37862

>>37853
this is really gross
the line of greasy-looking men waiting to enter the venue was already enough to make me queasy

No. 37884

>>37853
I wonder how Taylor will hard denial about that photobook

No. 37899

>>37824
That has more to do with your internet history than the content of the video you disgusting pig

No. 37943

>>37899
It's a missguided X Playboy fashion collaboration ad, the next scene is two models in some clothes, but thanks for playing

No. 37945

>>37853
This was pretty gross, nice to see the members of menclub all in one room together

No. 37946

Please vote below:
Do you think the next Taylor thread should not be on autosage? Nothing has happened with Kota for months/years yet her threads get bumped with sperging, Taylor does tell-all videos and hits 1 mil subscribers (some bought, no doubt) and is on autosage? Que?

No. 37965

>>37946
I think that before the recent drama this thread had a reason to be on autosage, since it really had no milk (plus, Kaka happened).
Now it really has no reason to be autosaged though, with all the MC milk. I get that someone is making sure to spam it and cause infights so that it gets autosaged (or worse, locked), but imho the mods should just ban the whiteknight sperg instead. As you said, there are threads with way less milk and way more nitpick that are bumped everyday.

No. 38041

>>37946
I think that the reason it's on autosage is because the majority of the posts itt are spergtacular. White Knights and aloggers combined. Even with new info this thread tends to be devoid of sane posting.
The same goes for Kota's thread (I was actually surprised that wasn't on autosage, probably just an oversight)
Personally, I'd prefer them both to stay on autosage. I think they attract fewer pull users that way.

No. 38066

>>38041
It doesn't bother me if it's on autosage, but I think it is because at some level, Kiki's gross involvement in previous Taylor R threads made people feel bad for her.

Completely unrelated, I finally found the post where Taylor bought the exact same shoes as Dakota (the irregular choice bunny shoes - in a different color)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140228160755/http://lovetaylor.com/?p=2314#more-2314
Like it or not, 2013-2016 was the era when Taylor copied so many of her poses and clothes. Dakota was a complete joke and Taylor was still trying to copy her. I am wondering more and more whether Tom thought that Taylor being a "better doll" than Dakota would make Beauty Exchange & their collaborators more money. That, combined with the "cute-sexy" bedtime pics for menclub…

No. 38067

File: 1551316790948.png (1.25 MB, 1920x1080, Screenshot 2018-12-17 20.30.43…)

I guess the new thread pic will probably have something to do with Menclub. But I also find these screenshots of Taylor trying (despite the botox or whatever) to make "age lines" on her face pretty funny. She literally couldn't do it.

No. 38068

File: 1551316815177.png (1.26 MB, 1920x1080, Screenshot 2018-12-17 20.30.19…)


No. 38069

File: 1551316916513.png (1.19 MB, 1920x1080, Screenshot 2018-12-17 20.29.54…)


No. 38074

File: 1551319717346.jpg (18.35 KB, 554x554, 1548018846608.jpeg.jpg)

>>38066
Iirc Dakota only bought them because of Yolandi Visser.

No. 38113

File: 1551337477583.jpeg (21.81 KB, 349x221, 9FA307E5-050A-4DFF-A2F2-6BBAA1…)

>>38068
God the BLOAT!! Also her recent insta post looks so ridiculous

No. 38115

>>38074
wow, that's something I didn't know, and I've been wasting my time reading Dakota shit forever. Makes total sense, since Dakota used that Die Antwoord song 2(?) years later to launch her aliexpress jewelry brand.

I think it is pretty clear that Taylor didn't take any inspiration from Yolandi, though.

No. 38144

>>38113
It looks like she's trying to slow the appearance of aging by filling in the area around her nose and mouth with fillers… or is it just hideous shoop??

No. 38156

>>38113
>Enter “filler fatigue,” a buzzy beauty term to describe what happens when someone has had too much filler. Essentially, over time, filler stretches and weighs down the skin, which means you need more filler with each trip to the doctor, which will just stretch the skin and tissue even more.

She's caught in this cycle because if she stops with the fillers,her skin will start to sag. That's the reason why some celebs like Madonna look always bloated.

No. 38157

>>38156
If the skin sags, couldn't she just have the excess skin removed/lifted?
Her natural face was much better than whatever it is now. She has botox and fillers everywhere.

No. 38168

File: 1551370904611.jpg (686.58 KB, 2560x1920, IMG_0828.jpg)

>>38066

All paid for by Tom. The irony about how many argued she paid for everything and could afford to pay a manager to fly out with her just to take pictures of her shopping. She really hasn't done a whole lot of modelling since late 2013.

I oddly miss the living doll era. LD Flakes were more interesting than this whole insta thot trend.

>>38157

That would take too much downtime and recovery. No doubt she'll do it years down the road but not any time soon. Taylor is all about quick fixes.

>>38156

How long does it take for this sagging/stretching to take place? and wouldn't it likely happen more to someone much older than Taylor.


And what about this for a new thread pic.

No. 38178

>>38168
>How long does it take for this sagging/stretching to take place? and wouldn't it likely happen more to someone much older than Taylor

Fillers stretch the skin slightly more and more every time you use them. Of course sagging would happen more to older people but we don't know how often Taylor does fillers. In the end everything adds up and looking uncanny valley is sometimes a matter of a few millimeters. Plus fillers don't dissolve completely, so she will never ever look like her natural self again.

No. 38202

>>38178
I think that the chances of sagging could be higher for someone who gets so much fillers in their cheeks. Taylor really goes apeshit with those cheek fillers.
>Plus fillers don't dissolve completely
I don't know what kind of filler does she get, but usually fillers do dissolve completely, that's why people go get them 2-3 times a year. With hyaluronic acid, it turns into water and CO2 and gets absorbed by the body.

No. 38223

>>38067
I don't even remember this bit from the video, but yeah that's pretty good evidence of botox. No movement in her forehead despite scrunching her face up as hard as possible. She actually looks like she got the crowsfeet done too since she has irregular wrinkle/crease placement under the eyes but not in the corners.

Well. If she ever wants to quit being an internet celebrity all she needs to do is quit her surgical procedures and change makeup styles and nobody will recognize her.

No. 38268

Do you have to stop getting botox and fillers when pregnant? Like I thought Taylor said she was wanting to get pregnant or has the whole MenClub situation ruined that.

I thought that was one of the reasons Kylie J. went into hiding was because she stopped filler and botox while pregnant.

No. 38276

File: 1551453724652.png (1.8 MB, 880x2724, these-people-need-to-get-a-lif…)

>>37853
this thing is weird AF lol

No. 38277

>>38268
Injecting chemicals into your face doesn't seem like it would be a great idea, since they are meant to dissolve and thus pass through her bloodstream

Also has she ever considered botox and fillers may be contributing to her acne? Buying creams and soaps and whatever will only go so far when you are literally injecting foreign substances into your skin. I wonder if she can segue into a new look not involving surgical enhancement, maybe this what she has been experimenting with, with the new blonde hair, brows, and eyelash extensions.
I think something like red hair or dark hair would definitely distract from whatever facial changes occur when dropping the surgery.

Though I can't see Taylor ever quitting the lifestyle she obviously enjoys


>>38066
This web archive link is really strange, as she obviously had Tom or another sugar Daddy with her funding this trip, but she goes to great lengths to suggest (via selfies for most images and never mentioning her companion) that she was completely alone. Yeah, lone women always show up to The Ivy and numerous other high end establishments to eat and entertain themselves alone

No. 38305

>>38277
Flying first/business class on someone else's bill… That's awkward.

No. 38307

>>38277
I just went though that post and… wow. She looked different but is already the gold digger/luxury lifestyle girl she’s nowadays
I mean I love to see these kinda posts bc it’s not the life I have but it’s strange how I only realize this now

No. 38315

>>38277

So it's safe to say it's harmful to a fetus? Wonder if she'll give it up, or give into vanity like she always has and keep getting injection while pregnant.

Taylor and Tom go back to like 2013. (The year she slowed on working and got hardcore into the dolly trend ) It's been theorized for quite some time that she had someone covering all her expenses and shopping. It's only recently that Lolcow is now in agreeance about it as PULL was the only place speculating it at the time. However, I still get some satisfaction knowing she lived the life Dakota wished she had/lived. Kaka's jealousy and sperging was quite some treat.

No. 38317

>>38277
I actually archived a lot of her old posts like this. I can pinpoint almost exactly when she started seeing Tom. There are some really weird pics of her shopping (with tons of bags around her) and at luxury establishments pretending to be alone (probably to stoke her male fans' fantasy that she's just a young, single student) I'm sure someone will cry "creepy stalker" but I kind of want to make a big photo timeline. Her development into what she was then & what she is now is so weird.

She claimed that Tom's first gift to her was that Pullip doll he had customized to look like her. In her post about buying Pullip dolls, she says she bought it herself. (I'm sure he bought all of them, not that I care)

No. 38318

File: 1551479734804.png (473.73 KB, 390x522, crooked-nose.png)

>>38317
Good on you anon!

The older I get, the grosser the concept of sugardating gets.

Also does Taylor still have a crooked nose?

No. 38319

>>38317
sorry to continue my post, but I think the level of deliberate deception while maintaining a huge social media presence, in which she pretended to be underage… I think that is what weirds me out.

Add to that her "just work hard and be nice!!" motivational messages. How can she say with any degree of seriousness that her success is completely separate from Tom's? He hired her many times. He paid for her state-of-the-art cameras and equipment. Her clothes. Her trips. Her living quarters. The supplies for her stupid DIYs.

No. 38334

File: 1551490316182.jpeg (78.49 KB, 1024x897, left-profile-filler-2-1024x897…)

>>38318
I think she has fillers in nose too. It's a popular way to even out your nose bridge without any surgeries.

No. 38335


No. 38370

>>38334
It is incredible what ur able to do with just injections but Taylor went so far overboard. I’m sure using filters all the time makes you hate your real face at soe point

No. 38375

>>38317
I actually love looking at stuff like that. I don't think it's creepy, it's fascinating to see past the carefully honed image she has now.

No. 38380

>>38317
Please do that! I’d love to see a timeline

Can someone please just create a new thread soon?

No. 38417

>>38380
>>38317
nobody crying creepy stalker but actually nobody cares about how she bought things or how tom gifted her those things, srsly like we passed the whole trying to pretend being independent thing two years ago

No. 38425

>>38380
I'll do the timeline, but would prefer if someone else created the new thread. I've never made one here before & there are so many important elements that should be on the first post

No. 38428

>>38074
IC fan here, Dakota's Flopsy heels were released a year before the Cherry Deer ones so I don't think she was copying for once. Sage for not contributing.

No. 38485

>>37943
You posted it with taytays video as if to implicate she’s shady but now you’re backtracking cus you realize you’re stupid? Alright pc baby

No. 38501

Ok, I'll make the new thread, but what kind of text should be in the first post?

I know that all her social media should be there.

Do we want the collage pic, one of the botox ones, an ageplay pic ? some kind of mash-up with MC?

No. 38540

>>38501
Kawaii Dolly, a current pic, a pic of her shopping and a screencap about MC should do it

Write up should be brief but thorough since we will be looking at it for a while, focus on being a sugar baby but denying it, and Tom's pervy website and related wealth. Her constant image and personality changes, clickbait, rush wedding, assistant and other odd elements of her life.

No. 38541

>>38485
Hi (cow), no if you engaged your grey matter a little more you'd realise I was pointing out the irony. It says missguided.co.uk right there in the screencap

No. 38547

>>38541
Yeah but ads are based on your own search history so maybe the misguided one is you

Fucking retard

No. 38574

She claims to have hazel eyes, but they are actually muddy brown. She wears color contacts in every picture when she has light brown or green eyes. Color contacts are easy to spot because of the weird 2D appearance and pinned, uneven pupils. I don't know why she would lie about something that no one (not even modeling agencies) cares about.

No. 38610

File: 1551683846956.jpeg (50.63 KB, 559x304, F3AB7658-6208-4F25-8252-04BEB4…)

I would call that hazel. Obv it’s facetuned and she used a ring light but still

No. 38631

File: 1551702526714.jpg (265.93 KB, 1920x1080, Screenshot_20190304-132532.jpg)

>>38574
Hazel has a very wide colour range and Taylor definitely has hazel eyes even though hers are more muted with very few green and gold specs

No. 38649

>>38610
This pic looks like small coloured contacts imho. But I agree, she has hazel eyes. The post directly under this shows them clearly.

I don't even know what "muddy brown" is supposed to mean. If anon doesn't like hazel eyes, fine. But hazel and brown and "honey" (a more gold hazel) eyes are pretty. I prefer them to blue eyes.

No. 38674

someone on PULL claims to be one of MC´s victims and said she was posted there. I honestly don´t believe it

No. 38679

>>38674

Smells of Bullshit.

Funny how there is always some BS anon/Pulltard to appear and claim to know/be a victim of such and such drama. Are the girls over their actually believing any of it?

No. 38682

>>38674
'Glowseeker' is apparently a pull member since 2016 and commented on a few Taylor threads. Now she claims her pics were posted on MC without her permission. That's a big coincidence and I hope she's telling the truth otherwise this smells like a witch hunt.

Taylor and Tom apologized, so why are they still so obsessed about MC? MC won't post articles and pictures about minors anymore. Wasn't that pulls initial goal? Now it's clear to me that it's not about the underaged girls but about having some kind of revenge

>>38679
Yes, they are believing her apparently

No. 38686

>>38682
I think they found many more underage girl on that site. They won’t shut up about it.
Btw tays new video was a damn mess

No. 38699

>>38674
Neither do I.
Besides they are also misrepresenting what Taylor said in those stupid videos. She never claimed that the editors contacted the girls whose instas were featured.
She said that she contacted the 13 year old model (wtf why)
And she said that girls/women interviewed in the MC Girls section are asked or their agencies get them in
But as far as I know, the creepy editors don't bother telling the people whose pictures they use.

But this probably the biggest issue I have with the Taylor R section on Pull. Like I think being disgusted with site is reasonable and worth discussing as is some of the other shit she does, but her section is just filled with lies, tinfoiling, misunderstandings, and bullshit.
Pulltards deliberately try to rewrite history to suit their preferred narrative, and any actual conversation becomes impossible because they are busy circlejerking about something that didn't even happen, while simultaneously fellating their own virtue. It's insufferable.

No. 38773

>>38674
PULLfags always make it hard for when there's actual shit, with their need to fabricate stuff all the time as if the milk isn't enough.

No. 38830

Can anyone explain the sudden dip in views and subscribers? She was getting 700-1000+ a day for months. Suddenly down to 433 new subscribers for 194,971 views on 2019-02-25. For the past several days, she was in the 200s for new subscribers and mid 50,000s for views. Then on 2019-03-04, she lost -48 subscribers but had 81,116 views.

No. 38846

>>38830
My guess is she was buying subscribers so she could time when her 1 mil celebration was. Getting around 1000 every day when she uploads about once a week didn't make sense. The stats you mention seem more organic.

No. 38847

>>38846
interesting, she probably used the 1mil celebration as a distraction from the MC stuff

No. 38880

>>38846
>>38847
I also think she's been buying subscribers, but it's been going on for longer than the stuff about MC came to light. https://socialblade.com/youtube/user/taylorr1488

By the way, even her kickboxing place is tied to MC. https://zh-hk.facebook.com/defpromotionshk/posts/2204026339837394 MC broadcasts the gym's fights.

So how much of Taylor's content is really Tom's?

No. 38917

>>38880
Probably all of it. Who knows how much of Taylor's life has been from Tom & inspires by the living doll fad.

No. 38924

>>38880

Taylor's unoriginal and incredibly fake. She has no creative ideas of her own, and that's why she has always copied something trendy or someone who at the time was more popular than her. She's the living embodiment of "dumb blonde".

Does anyone remember her original Youtube videos? how boring and monotone she was. She would literally google nutrition info just to recite in her videos to sound knowledgeable. OR she copied what Dakota did and made hair styling tutorials. I wouldn't be surprised if 75% of her channel were things that Tom told her to do. Because when it was just her all she did was sit on her bedroom floor and complain or go shopping for the 13896938 times.

… The only thing she's actually good at doing is fast fashion shopping.

No. 38944

>>38924
She’s too bland to do the dumb blonde like Trisha or Gigi back in the day

No. 39085

>>38924
I've said it in the past and I'll say it again- Taylor got everything Dakota wanted from going viral, and now it looks like the jig is up for both of them. Lucky for Taylor she locked down her lifestyle by marrying Tom.

No. 39109

Classy party: https://www.instagram.com/p/BrGKNGtlSQD/

Ducati Owners Club and MC. The guy only seems to tag MC when they're involved.

Tom randomly talking about his battle with depression and how to get through it: https://www.instagram.com/p/Busu02uFCz4/

and what's this about Taylor going to give a lecture on her business ventures to a university class?

No. 39110

File: 1551989501557.jpeg (259.57 KB, 750x1050, 5D384047-6BBB-496E-94AB-DD4E98…)

>>39109
Post the screenshot next time newfag

No. 39121

>>39110
Tinfoil, he blamed one of his staff for the teenagers-on-MC fuckup, and now said staff member is "off with depression". It seems to be about managers and staff less than himself.

No. 39135

>>39110
>>39109


100% Tom is writing the speech for her as she's a turnip and couldn't roll her way out of a one-way street.

No. 39226

>>39109
In all honesty:
Taylor was a model and is now a wife to a multimillionaire. She has no degree and can't speak Chinese or Japanese although she lived there for years. Oh, and she has a youtube channel with 1 million subs which she finally achieved (with Toms helping hand) in 6 years and a mediocre click rate.

This woman has to say nothing about anything business related but gold digging. And if this speech is about Youtube: Emma Chamberlain or Antonio Garza should hold a speech about Youtube business since they have build their audience without help, resources and connections within a year. Taylor has proven herself to have no morals (I give her a second chance though because MC is Toms magazine), no talent, no creativity and no diligence…I mean she can't even hold a simple uploading schedule kek. She's just a privileged, lazy white woman who was lucky enough to snag a millionaire. And that's it. There's nothing wrong with it, Taylor should just own it and stop with ~GirLb0sS shit. She should be ashamed of herself that she believes that she can give these people serious business tips who are coming from a poor upbringing with no opportunities, who worked very hard and are truly looking for good tips. I hope someone will call her out and embarrass her. She needs to learn the hard way.

No. 39405

>>39344

Taylor used to claim to speak the languages back in the day. She was lazy though, she only hired a translator to help her sound fluent in videos and do subtitles. I'm also pretty sure in the movies she played in they had her dubbed over. I can't imagine them doing otherwise with a girl who can hardly speak Japanese.

She always tells her fans to study and work hard despite never doing so herself.

No. 39417


No. 39424

>>39417
Is she serious? She can't even make a simple power point presentation by herself? And this woman wants to hold a speech at a university kek. I love how Natalie is side eyeing her the whole time.

No. 39429

>>39344
It is a personal failing. If you only work and hang out with other foreigners and don't speak the local language, you're not going to make friends with the natives. That's common sense, not everyone else's fault. Taylor has all of the time and resources at her disposal. She even refuses to take public transport, that's how little she interacts with the local population. Even if she could speak the language, why should the locals want to be her friend?

>>39424
Tom is trying too hard to make Taylor sound like a success.

No. 39448

>>39429
He has to, otherwise he's just another middle aged, rich Asian man who made his money off sexualizing young girls & married his white sugar baby. Regardless of what a great personality he may have, he's skeevy and Taylor is a glorified sugar baby turned trophy wife who wants to seem more special than every other white sugarwife.

No. 39756

Is anyone working on a new thread?

Taylor posted some nice DMs she had with fans encouraging them to aim for their goals and be confident (but not quit the dayjob)

though I think people overlook how much of what we see is Tom's, it was a nice gesture

No. 39822

>>39756

I keked so hard reading those.

Her whole speech about how she started from scratch at 25 and worked so hard to get where she is. Tom not only filmed her most popular videos but she also said he gave her those ideas. The rest she just copied off of people who were more popular.

Tom filmed for her
Tom came up with most of the ideas if they weren't just stolen off of some popular account
Tom funded all her expensive trips
Tom funded her expensive apartment
Tom bought all her fancy expensive dolly shit
Tom put together her meet and greets
Tom is writing her speech
She paid someone to translate and do subtitles

Chicky hasn't really done one single thing on her own without someone funding or brainstorming for her. Even her fan club name is stolen from PULL " Taytor Tots". Also, how can she say she started from scratch when she had sooo much financial backing from Tom that she could refuse jobs left and right if they didn't fit the dolly image. She certainly didn't keep her daytime job or work to fund her dreams.

It's a nice gesture, but it's fake as hell coming from her.

No. 39845

>>39756
Sounds very similar to Tom's inspirational posts (and she never used ellipses like that before). She also told fans to DM haters.

Daily average views now in the negatives (-6050 daily, -181,500 last 30 days), so she's deleted more videos. Anyone know which ones? In preparation for the university lecture? Discrepancies in subscriber and view counts again, too.

March 7: 356 subs/50,909 views
March 10: 69 subs/103,053 views
March 12: 251 subs/47,131 views

Also starting to question if the "natural" clinic she's visiting is sponsored content. I think the Tokyo clinic where she got her BC was even if she failed to say so.

No. 39990

could someone pls post more of her archived blog posts? I actually enjoyed seeing the one of her trip to paris & london lol.

No. 40005

>>39990

Pretty sure she made a Youtube video about that trip. Unless Tom took her on more than one Paris trip during that period.

… Welp, I guess that video was one of the videos she deleted recently because it's gone. Guess she's cleaning out her old content now that people are looking into it.

No. 40008

>>40005
>>39990
Of course she's deleting old content because these videos and blog posts contain evidence that she wasn't working much and most of the time shopping and on sugar trips with Tom. It's a harsh contrast to her current desired image. She wants to be seen as a serious business women who worked very hard, so she must delete her past which shows the truth that she was a sugar baby. That's a smart move of her imo

No. 40009

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 40022

>>40008

Kek, video basically showed her staying at a fancy hotel, shopping at Chanel, eating at expensive restaurants and buying expensive treats at cafes. I'm pretty sure the video is on other sites though.

No. 40025

>>40008
You mean it was a smart move by Tom. And anyway, it won't exactly work considering how much popularity Tom bought for her as a living doll, which makes up the bulk of the followers she has now. If Taylor changes her image to a smart businesswoman now she's gonna lose lots of followers, because yet another rich girl sugar baby/model turned influencer/trophy wife isn't gonna keep followers.

No. 40044

>>40025
She's changing from living doll to business woman gradually since the last few years. The change wasn't abrupt of course but more fluent with lots of small stages in between. Remember her video where she exposes her old living doll phase? Remember when she called herself a girlboss (when she actually wasn't)? She even talked about investing money in previous videos and now she's married, has two houses, held a speech at a university (and probably more to come) and wants a lifestyle online magazine like Tom. Her fans are praising her for her change and ~hustle.

No. 40054

>>40044

She wants to be like Kylie Jenner and be able to post selfies all day and be a businesswoman. I guess in some sense she is turning into a Walmart version of Kylie and Tom is her Kris Jenner.

I don't think she realizes how unrealistic her advice comes off about following dreams, especially when she has literally dropped everything in a heartbeat if it didn't suit her. Like dropping out of college, dropping modelling, switching countries because one supports your style more. No normal person has a rich husband to push their dreams for them. A perfect video to display her laziness is one where she talks about why she's been gone off youtube, and Tom literally says when asked what she's been doing " Sleeping, eating, shopping, pooping… Nothing".


Also, is anyone working on the new thread yet?

No. 40066

So here is the text I have so far. Thoughts? I still need a picture.

Taylor R is a “hardworking” “self-made” “successful” former model and Youtuber from Canada whose main claim to fame used to be copying Dakota’s embarrassing 2012-2015 living doll phase. She’s abandoned this endeavor to copy Casey Neistat, the Kardashians, and Jenna Marbles. Her latest schtick is bad DIY videos and boring 30-minute vlogs in which she recaps serious challenges from her week, including hiring an assistant (for no apparent reason), eating food, drinking Starbucks coffee, exercising, and seeing various scam artists (fortune tellers, naturopathic healers).
Her newly minted husband, Tom Lip, bought her a giant engagement ring from Tiffany’s with the bundles of cash he earns running “digital marketing” companies. One of these companies, MenClub, was exposed for featuring at least 8 underage (age 12-16) girls in skimpy clothing on their site. After news of this spread, Taylor made two videos defending the right of men to ogle children (it’s “cultural”! Don’t like, don’t click!) and insisted that she was never an escort, a claim no one ever made seriously. The purpose of the MenClub “private room” (which requires an individual to vet the applicant’s salary) is still unknown. Taylor claims that it’s for latte-making classes.
Taylor still manages to be relatable after giving up modeling by purchasing two condos with Tom’s money (one in downtown Toronto, one custom-built in Hong Kong). Her new full-time jobs include getting her face thoroughly frozen with botox/fillers, traveling in first class and by helicopter for no reason, and getting pregnant by Tom as soon as possible. Anything that happens in her life (such as an ovarian cyst) is immediately used and milked for views from her teenaged followers.

Taylor’s Links:
https://www.facebook.com/Taylor.R.Official/
https://www.instagram.com/taytay_xx/?hl=en
http://lovetaylor.com/
https://www.youtube.com/user/TaylorR1488

Tom Lip's controversial site for men: https://www.menclub.hk/

Older:
http://www.weibo.com/taylorrichard
http://lineblog.me/taylor/
https://ameblo.jp/iamtaytay/
http://taytay.zipper.jp/
http://www.cchan.tv/clipper/taylor

No. 40067

>>40066
I'll space the paragraphs better when it's posted.

No. 40074

>>40066
Yep this is a great summary Anon! What picture are you going to use?

No. 40116

>>40066
Great. I think you should add a sentence about most of Taylor's jobs coming from beauty exchange, men's club and Tom's other connections.

No. 40154

>>40074
I think anons wanted a composite picture but I'm not great at making them plus I'm supposed to be writing an assignment. I'll see what I can do unless someone posts something in the next few hours. The problem is that there are a ton of great pics one could use, both old and new.

No. 40203

New thread: >>40202

No. 157614

File: 1624834568368.png (997.48 KB, 1080x1907, Screenshot_20210225-2250562.pn…)


No. 160508

File: 1626126415306.jpg (80.32 KB, 800x1440, 148300532_414218539645845_9167…)




Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]