File: 1745821960696.jpeg (10.08 KB, 275x275, what is wrong withu.jpeg)

No. 2502644
A thread for the daft, the dim, the silly and the merely confused.
Previous thread:
>>>/ot/2479304Please follow all global rules and remember to report and ignore bait: avoid infighting.
If you want to ask random questions and hear other anons’ personal answers, check out the Random Questions thread instead. This thread is more for asking silly questions and getting concrete answers.
Random Questions #5 thread:
>>>/ot/2478867 No. 2502730
File: 1745835394233.jpg (244.47 KB, 934x1332, 1000010904.jpg)

what would I search to find boots like this image?
No. 2502797
>>2502730A help from an eurofag
nonny so beware if this isn't a direct translation but: this is called cuissard style boots
No. 2503103
>>2503039I kind of meant like… the biology of sexual attraction to men and women with this question? I don’t believe that there’s a specific evolutionary purpose for being gay or straight, that honestly seems really retarded to me… As if there’s a biological purpose for the tribe if some people prefer fat women or skinny women or cute men or macho men. Like it just exists, variation exists. My pet hasn’t got a same-sex hubby because the primordial DNA gods thought that would be beneficial some way, and anthropomorphising biological intention is stupid. Like is that not obvious to anyone but me? Things with no purpose or with detrimental purpose happen all the time, in fact probably the majority of the time…?
I’m talking physiologically and neurologically, what is the difference between a gay man, bisexual man, and straight man, and the same for women.
No. 2503122
File: 1745865808051.jpg (25.65 KB, 612x408, istockphoto-105559008-612x612.…)

My father having a mid-life crisis and is making me learn options and stock tradings because he missed out on it so he's making me do it in his stead to live vicariously through me, he's literally taking $100 out of his paycheck every month to give to me to do it. I don't know the first thing about trading beyond Buy Low, Sell High. Can any nonnie give me some recommended reading and watching for the retarded?
No. 2503149
File: 1745867544883.jpg (57.62 KB, 1200x600, 1000011591.jpg)

Fandom nonnies, is Voltron worth watching at all for shipping? I've seen and heard terrible things about the old fandom and show but I think the male characters besides the buff one are hot
No. 2503164
>>2503149If you're only interested in picrel then it's
okay, but it's FAR from the "almost canon" fujobait the fandom wants you to believe. You won't have a shortage of old fanworks to read, though.
Sheith had better chemistry imo No. 2503187
>>2503155I feel like with the new wave of trannism they are bound to be but since you have lady boys there I feel like they could be more strict as in a scrote with a beer belly, five clock shadow, 5 months on E would be ridiculed kek.
In these poor countries, like even Brazil, it’s better to be a faggot tranny though, since they are basically all prostitutes, who seek men.
No. 2503206
File: 1745869125993.jpg (97.27 KB, 960x720, gdgf.jpg)

Did he really kill himself?
No. 2503621
File: 1745889126807.webp (67.99 KB, 832x832, pdp-the-slimmer-trimmer-sky-2.…)

For the anons who prefer to trim back their body hair rather than fully shave, like armpits for example, how do you handle scissors with the opposite hand? I might just end up buying one of those "intimate area" razors, but there's gotta be an easier way with the scissors right?
No. 2503708
File: 1745896486123.jpg (13.79 KB, 236x261, 1a7a44ffec13e4110a1238de52a7be…)

does barnes & noble just let you loiter and read like it's a library, last time i went there they had manga and i really want to get into it but can't read it digitally because i have eye strain problems. i don't want to have to pay for it though beforehand
No. 2503993
File: 1745925523393.jpeg (169.95 KB, 2000x2000, IMG_4034.jpeg)

Are hamsters and bunnies natural? By this I mean, do they exist in nature or are they manmade animals destined to be pets
No. 2504022
>>2503982Yes, but
only that and nothing else and insists you only use it
No. 2504071
How much physical affection with friends is normal for you?
>>2504062I feel weird about the fact I was a really chubby kid/preteen but skinny as an adult.
No. 2504173
>>2504134Yes tumblr does notify the person who reblogged it who you commented on. I've had rando 3-way convos with the OP, the person who reblogged it, and me lol.
>>2504171Personally I really like king prawns
No. 2504222
>>2504071Why would you feel weird? Losing weight, fasting, exercise,
even anachan-ing out is rather normal
No. 2504298
File: 1745952464352.jpeg (10.22 MB, 5712x4284, IMG_4033.jpeg)

what animal could've dug these holes in My FUCKING Y A R D?!
No. 2504321
>>2504302I think there would still be
some beauty standards (for both men and women), because humans admire beauty in general. It just wouldn’t be the
most important thing about a woman. And the standards would probably be more like looking clean and healthy rather than having lip fillers and a BBL.
No. 2504337
>>2504331You go on here kek. That being said nice to see another unwashed woman into philosophy.
>>2504302I think beauty standards in matriarchal societies would be a lot more diverse and based on personal effort like the quality of clothing, hair, etc; Like how a lot of women in many subcultures can appreciate women of other subcultures based on how much time they put on their appearance and thought they put into their outfits.
No. 2504358
File: 1745955775145.png (191.92 KB, 512x512, unnamed.png)

How do you lose weight when your partner is supportive on the surface, but doesn't actually care about health nor to help out so they end up enabling you to keep eating unhealthy? I have a big sugar problem but I can't force someone to give up their snacks just because I can't keep my own grubby fingers away…
No. 2504369
File: 1745956165397.jpeg (156.9 KB, 1200x630, Addams Family_cropped.jpeg)

Would they condone slurs? Since good is bad and bad is good to them
No. 2504412
File: 1745958856895.jpg (71.39 KB, 540x540, wends.jpg)

>>2504369yes, anon what a great idea for a film, if we lived in a sane worl
No. 2504419
File: 1745959626403.jpg (21.43 KB, 500x500, 1000017832.jpg)

>>2504387It's a lot of things, but it all can be chalked up to a lack of taste and inexperience. The more obvious itas are the ones who buy very cheap and poorly crafted dresses/skirts, chinese brands are the most guilty of producing these, but there are still some good quality chinese brands. The print will be shiny and will look like polyester, there may be too many details like ruffles and lace (poorly made too). Another obvious one is blouseless coords, accessories like leg warmers, fishnets or other pantyhose, demonia shoes that do not match, etc. This one can be easy to overlook if you are new but a lot of itas have no understanding of motifs and will mix and match items that clash. Picture a black skirt with a cathedral print paired with some black pumps adorned with bows. It sounds fine but the cathedral motif is obviously considered gothic and the shoes would be sweet, picrel would have been a better match. You mentioned them being ugly, I do think there's some bias in those threads but that does bring up another point. Lolita is all about presentation and that will have to include things like hygeine, skincare, makeup and haircare. Having greasy, dyed hair that's been growing out will immediately make your coord look less put together, it makes you look like you haven't given the outfit much thought. Same goes for clown makeup. Some women, at least in my opinion, have faces that don't suit their chosen style. I don't think they should be posted for having an unfitting face, though.
No. 2504499
>>2504387It's a lot of little things that add up, usually. Cheap materials, a bad fit, mismatched colors, thinking that the hair and makeup aren't part of the coord, no or mismatched accessories… the list goes on forever. Like
>>2504419 said lots of newbies mix styles that don't go together so it ends up looking weird. Or they'll stick a massive headbow on their flat short hair and forget the petticoat and wear a plain Shein button down with their ill-fitting JSK and socks that come halfway up their calves and make them look obese even if they're thin and pair it with ugly clunky shoes and a bag that has nothing to do with the coord.
You need to pay attention to the tiny details to make a good coord. Simple coords are fine and look great but you still need to make the whole thing look cohesive.
The EGL livejournal used to be full of extreme nitpicking over one brand's shade of sax vs another brand's shade of sax and why it was impossible to wear them together because they were totally different colors and didn't fucking match reeeee. It was hilarious and everyone took it way too seriously but I kinda miss those days, now everyone's a lolita if the frills are in your heart and there are no rules uguuu. It was common to put together collages of coord ideas to justify a major purchase, because lolita is an expensive fashion and you'd have to squeeze as many outfits as possible out of every item. That meant that wardrobes were built slowly and with a lot of intent. If you didn't understand the rules, you'd end up with blouses that didn't match your skirts and JSKs, accessories that matched nothing, and wigs meant for a totally different style.
No. 2504716
File: 1745981425357.jpeg (250.66 KB, 1024x528, IMG_5575.jpeg)

Have you ever met this kind of guy before?
No. 2504744
>>2504742I’m sorry nonna, I too couldn’t believe it, but his character was so sweet
so is he or not?
No. 2504745
File: 1745985250767.webp (1.78 KB, 293x86, 122112.webp)

>>2504744Nta but I don't think so, it's never been confirmed iirc but does it matter either way? If you wanna yume do so. Be like picrel
No. 2504938
File: 1746014022545.webp (15.21 KB, 640x360, g.webp)

>>2504741there's been a fan theory for years that he was some kind of sex pest or had an otherwise shady past. it's probably bullshit but maybe that will be enough to kill your libido
No. 2505151
>>2505012Yeah, mostly classical but also movie, game and anime OSTs. There used to be a site where you could exchange sheet music or simply ask for it. That's how I got Michael Nyman's official The Piano sheet booklet (scanned) and the Kingdom Hearts piano collection among a few others. Now even poorly transcribed pieces are paywalled let alone anything official.
>but there's imslpYes, thanks. That's a treasure trove. One realizes how valuable such sites are after having to look for anything beyond.
No. 2505168
>>2505102>>2505112Ayrt. I don't like them either so I don't know what this argument is. I in fact find them annoying and tiring and loud. I'm talking about people who openly go out of their way to talk to or yell at random children in their life as if it's an interpersonal feud. Just ignore the annoying brat, why interact with them? It's a sign you're mentally childish too if you want to interact with them.
If some random child starts throwing a tantrum at the table next to you in a restaurant, would you just go up to their face and scream at them to shut the fuck up? No, unless you're itching for drama. At least yell at their parents they're raising a brat. Not beef with the literal toddler. Those types are too cowardly to tell the parents so they go for the easier target.
No. 2505299
File: 1746035138283.jpg (61.78 KB, 799x799, 51bbad_17be6ca378fd4e5d9b6a8bc…)

>>2505267I guess it depends if they're imagining themselves having sex with those women or just watch from a voyeuristic point or something like pic related
No. 2505459
>>2505299if a man got turned on thinking about gay acts because it turned the fujos on would it be the same?
>voyeuristic viewwhat do you mean? i feel like being attracted to sex in a voyeuristic way is still attraction to the people
No. 2505467
>>2505462Kek, I wanted to emphasise because some people tell me I’m the most beautiful person they’ve seen, whether they’re lying or not. Sorry if that doesn’t sound humble to say, I recognise that but we’re anonymous here, so. It’s just there’s more pressure. If someone is just kind of attractive, best-looking-person-at-your-college kind of person, I feel like the way you’re seen is different? Attractive and fuckable but no one’s putting you on a pedestal. Less people interested in how you looked as a child too.
>but nobody thinks about if you were cute as an 11yo or not.Ok… I hope so. Thanks
No. 2505508
>>2504302I agree with these anons
>>2504365 >>2504337
And why would characteristics associated with maleness be praised in a matriarchal society? It would just be that being masculine as a woman would not be some sort of transgression due to lacking appeal to men.
Women have their own intrasexual standards, even outside of what men like, always have. I think it’s interesting. As much as women associate hating fat girls with misogyny and men, as weight increases, the higher the proportion of men coveting your looks compared to fellow women. People don’t talk about this, but thinness is social capital. Among women and girls. When hyper-anorexia is trending is it because men think it’s suuper hot to look that thin? …No, duh, it’s women that think it’s cool and cunty to look thin, want to hang out and take pics with other thin girls, exclude girls who they think are kind of chubby or even if they’re not that mean, subconsciously think they’re lesser. You can even recognize this yourself, if you’ve ever went from average to skinny. Women will compliment you wayy more, treat you like “that girl” kek.
Other standards are presentation and style, and this includes personality. I think if women’s standards were valued over men, your curated look and aesthetic would be a big thing too. This honestly could be tied to the weight standard too with how clothes look on different bodies.
You can kind of see the difference in women and men’s idea of female beauty in games, manga, book (art) and other media that are designed and written by women FOR girls or women and girls. Winx, shoujo, even dress-up games like Nikki. I say kind of because these are still influenced by what men find attractive to a degree and there would definitely be more of less stereotypically feminine presentation.
But this is just referring to what women tend to admire and praise in other women, it doesn’t quite remove the patriarchal edge yet. Removing patriarchal standards would probably lead to a wider scope of what can be considered attractive for women, and less necessity to be considered sexually attractive to men. This doesn’t mean lack of appreciation, but lack of need to conform to what doesn’t offend men. Eg it doesn’t mean no one would want to shave, but that not shaving would not be a big deal or mean anything really.
In terms of what kind of attractiveness would be uplifted, again it’s the wider breadth. I actually think femininity would be even more praised, the difference is whether it’s male-appreciated femininity or female-appreciated femininity, which I think are two very different things. The former would be unimportant. I think qualities like elegance, warmth, romanticism, being ‘cool’ - not necessarily at the same time - would be some well-liked attributes.
No. 2505574
>>2504302In the current patriarchal society there are barely any beauty standards for men. My guess is that pressure would be put on men to look a certain way and
they would be forced into uncomfortable clothes, plastic surgery and self hatred, and women would take on the role males have today where being unkempt in social settings is acceptable. I doubt women would be as dirty and unkempt as men, but women would probably look more relaxed and natural, all feminine body types would be acceptable, shaving would be uncommon, short hair would probably be way more common since it's lower maintenance, and makeup would also be uncommon in women, though I think men would wear masculinizing makeup styles.
No. 2505612
>>2504302I responded to your post earlier and I changed my mind. I don't think I gave it enough thought and I felt like I could give much more explanations.Most of my writing is based on speculation, like a series of traits that humans prioritize and associate with power. As society currently prioritizes men on the basis of physical strength, I think matriarchal societies would prioritize women on the basis of endurance and survival (as women tend to have better long-term endurance compared to men)
I don’t think matriarchal society would necessarily focus on motherhood, but instead a higher focus on resource allocation and quality of life. The ability to have a household or state last long and prosperous would be a standard among women everywhere.
Men would have the expectation to fulfill the role of physical labor, but would be oppressed as their societal function would primarily be used for war. The idea of men dying in war for their country would be encouraged and romanticized. In a non-war setting, a man’s primary job would be taking care of the fields, and a woman's job would be dividing resources, and human resource directing. During times of war it would be easy for women to take over the fields, leaving young men to go into the trenches and die happily.
I don’t think there would be as emphasis on women being able to give life, as well as women wanting to be skinnier. The reason why a lot of women have stricter body expectations is not only because they’ve been psyop’d by gay men, but also generally having a skinnier body creates effective silhouettes. Hyper Skinniness and disordered eating is also rooted in mental issues regarding control.
Skinniness or fatness wouldn’t be something as polarizing as it is in our society, but will have more stereotypes depending on how a woman looks, like if a woman is chubbier she would have a lot more assumptions from other women to become a mother. There would be judgement towards skinnier women as hunger would reflect a poor state unable to have enough food to divide in excess, and would be associated with poorer decision making. The ideal body type would be much more diverse, but rooted in a sense of robustness, not too fat nor too skinny.
In fashion, women would have a lot more clothes to wear than men, as men would most likely wear less in order to show off their bodies to attract a woman. However the quality, craftsmanship, and coordination would be prioritized. The craftsmanship and quality would be a source of beauty standards depending on the rarity of the material, but it’s composition would reflect the prosperity of the state you reside in, the livelihood of it’s residents (how much do they give a fuck about making your clothes), and coordination would exist to reflect personal values and soundness of mind. I think matriarchal societies would have more trends while also being much more experimental in fashion. Makeup would be used by both men and women, and would also be experimental, less about accentuating the face to fit standards but to create a new face entirely, with new markings, colors, etc;
No. 2505810
>>2505612Huh, you know your matriarchial society have some interesting similarities to ancient Spartan society. Women had basically full control over the economies of the family and the men obv died in the wars. Pretty sure some of them killed their own sons for being cowardly and had government officals begging them for cash.
Now that I think about it my grandma had full control over the family's finances, buying multiple properties in the process while my grandpa worked. She also lookedshames her sons to this day.
No. 2505813
>>2503708as long as you can avoid barnes & noble security you should be fine
(they have orders to neutralize loiterers on sight)
No. 2506258
>>2506255It depends how fat they are. Whoever is fatter should be fed at the time they don't like so they can lose weight and be normal.
Also if this is about you and your moid (which it reads as) then I say dump him.
No. 2506343
>>2506258Kek it's actually not, but I appreciate the concern!
>>2506297>Eat together at 6.That's basically what happens when you start cooking at 5, B isn't happy with it. If you start at 7 dinner is basically ready at 8, which A isn't happy with.
>>2506310Eating the same meal meant "eating from the same cooking batch" as in food only gets cooked once in the evening. So one isn't making pasta while the other is cooking up a stew. They both eat the same pasta.
Not eating together is a "negative" as that's a bonding ritual for most people. And a lot of people don't like reheating meals, for whatever reasons. If you have to eat reheated leftovers every day it can make you feel like you don't matter.
No. 2506400
>>2506397Plastic surgery is way more common than you think, and plastic surgery "addicts" are very rare.
>>2506399This is incredibly invalidating to the millions of
victim of the boogeymen. Do better.
No. 2506409
File: 1746124461558.jpg (8.36 KB, 225x225, 1000032848.jpg)

>>2506408I will protect you
nonnie No. 2506414
File: 1746124666519.jpg (36.75 KB, 705x649, Untitled.jpg)

>>2506408I've talked with the farmhands and they're going to ban that mean
nonnie. You're safe now
No. 2506553
>>2506255Who the hell eats at 5? If you want to eat together you could compromise and eat at 6/6:30. Otherwise just eat separately or A can eat a light snack , aka some fruits and Greek yogurt.
I’d kill myself if I had to have dinner at 5 everyday kek.
No. 2506587
>>2506557Man I really overcomplicated the question lmao
The real question was at the end: if 2 people are hungry at different times, do you think the earlier or the later time should dictate when they eat (assuming they eat together)?
No. 2506672
>>2506662She’ll get mad at you if you point it out, so don’t, because she’s in the denial stage. I
With that being said I don’t understand how people can be attracted to fat people in general, to me they just look unhealthy and therefore ugly , just like smokers, gamblers, bald people etc , but tastes are tastes nonna.
No. 2506675
>>2506673I think that if they are born in America they will most likely be circumcised no? Is that not a usual practice in burger land nonnas?
Here in my country it’s not done so men all have their foreskins despite a strong Catholic core here.
No. 2506698
File: 1746138621681.jpeg (153.46 KB, 896x539, IMG_2275.jpeg)

>>2506688How are fat rolls attractive? I can somehow understand chubby people, but fat people like picrel look wrong kek.
No. 2507124
>>2506701Exactly, women store fat easier because it's good for us to have resources to carry and then feed babies, we look cute curvy and round, it keeps us warm in cold weather etc. Even if we want to lose weight it's harder for us.
But males who have optimal bodies for muscles and strength and who can burn calories much easier? Letting themselves go and getting fat? Embarrassing and weak. It's a much bigger failure for a man to be fat than a woman, it's not even close. Especially because even fat women I know put in effort to look good through hair, makeup, clothes, basic fucking hygiene… fat men don't.
No. 2507140
>>2507129Choconilla
Swirly
White chocolate
White caramel
No. 2507141
>>2507129Oreo.
I like Lightning McQueen as a name too if you don't need to go down the appearance based route.
No. 2507179
>>2507114Whites with creams are fine. Look up laundry stripping tutorials and follow the one that works best for you, that should get rid of the murkyness.
>>2507009Could be both. Or they're extremely online TIFs and this is their first time encountering a woman who actually likes women and they don't know what to do about it.
>>2506942If the put it underneath it'd vanish and she'd be arrested for indecent exposure kek.
No. 2507285
>>2507129coffee foam
caramel dumpling
burned sprayfoam if he is mischievous lil'shit
whipped peanut butter
maple sugar
No. 2507365
File: 1746194819049.webp (60.4 KB, 600x600, 880c82019f4c2f15928710a3df635f…)

>>2507174I wouldn't bother with them but don't buy again.
>>2507339>anal attention to detail and guidelines and it makes the community so unbearably obnoxiousThe fashion has strict rules and yes to an extend it's autistic but sticking to these rules is also not hard and they make your coord look how the fashion is supposed to look.
t. Lolita
No. 2507390
>>2507174This sounds like common dropshipping trickery. Look them up on trustpilot and see if it's worth complaining.
It's also very important to check if a site is legit and has good reviews before buying something online.
No. 2507457
File: 1746198449674.jpg (30.39 KB, 450x435, 1000025205.jpg)

What does it mean if a guy I'm showering with genuine compliments (on his good looks) just replies with stuff like "I know" and "you're not the first one to tell me that" etc?
No. 2507467
>>2507463NTA but seconding
>>2507460. He's a huge whore and probably has several STDs and STIs.
No. 2507728
File: 1746207801464.gif (13.4 MB, 640x640, alone.gif)

Where can i find other "based" women on the internet? I just want female online friends that arent gender obsessed TIFs or libfems. I know the friend finder thread is a thing, but based on the anecdotes ive read from anons who've posted on there i feel like i should avoid it. Ive also considered Tumblr because i know it has a pretty sizeable radfem community. Do people use Tumblr to make friends?
No. 2507878
File: 1746213577650.gif (1.23 MB, 220x220, 1000005645.gif)

I'm going to a rave tomorrow night. Never been to one before and I'm taking my bf.
Any tips?
No. 2507896
File: 1746214337762.gif (5.4 MB, 498x326, rave.gif)

>>2507878Drink lots of water and don't take drugs from randos that you haven't tested. Have fun!
No. 2508046
>>2507896>>2507924Thanks. I'll be taking my own drugs so I won't have to rely on creepy men
>>2508030I vaguely recall that? Agreed, the VPN ban is nice.
No. 2508106
>>2508058Getting legally high is probably the best way to go for your first time.
>I'm just worried about having my phone or keys stolen…I'm planning to take a fanny pack type thing with all my essentials, keeps in close to my body and I can see where it is. Might be worth getting something like that.
No. 2508135
>>2508123I'm not moral fagging. I could get murked in the western country I live in but that doesn't mean I'd move to the middle east just because it can happen anywhere. But I am an anachan so maybe knowing that if anyone tries do anything to me I'm done for makes me think the way I do.
>>2508130Who?
No. 2508145
>>2508118>To me the combination of willingly going to a place where you know for a fact there is someone looking to harm you AND being drunk and high does not sound like fun.I agree, going to bars, walking outside at night with friends high, hiking, camping, even amusement parks, they are all pretty dangerous. There's a reason why people still do it, and it's because staying at home doing the same sedentary activities isn't as fulfilling. Yes playing video games, sewing, crocheting, drawing, is fun, but that's not the end-all of trying to live as human for most people.
>But then the other confusing part to me is when people act shocked that something bad happened. Most of it isn't shock, it's sadness. People aren't surprised, that's why
victim blaming exists. "why didn't you cover up more" "why didn't you say no" "why didn't you just stay inside" "maybe he misunderstood your intentions". People aren't shocked when someone does something risky, and if you don't try to put blame on the individual for getting attacked you focus on the sadness of someone trying to have fun and being deeply hurt.
If we replaced rave with bar, yeah an anon did go to a bar and get hurt, but she just wanted to have fun. She should have known to stay inside and not get drunk in a place she's never been to before. Maybe she should have stayed inside, and let's not focus on the rapist moids, lets focus on what anon could be doing better.
No. 2508183
File: 1746225558578.gif (475.04 KB, 498x330, horserain.gif)

>>2508180>>2508146damn i wish i lived somewhere with raves now it sounds fun. ive always loved electronic music since i was little too
No. 2508299
>>2508247Good point nonna, male feminists are wolves in disguise, but they are quite easy to spot , their feminism is just “sew work is work!” Kek, you start saying that men are misogynistic and oppress women and you’ll
trigger their
victim complexes.
No. 2508345
File: 1746230527634.png (484.06 KB, 540x577, 1000017768.png)

What is your preferred method to browse lolcow?
Is it to go to the catalog and click on threads that interest you? Is it to scroll the specific boards front page and read all the newest comments?
Do you read the front page?
I have a theory how you browse imageboards makes a difference in how you perceive them
No. 2508363
>>2508345I like to scroll on my phone and check the threads I am interested in in, which are
>/otVent thread, confession thread, food thread, mundane shit, gender ideology hate thread mainly.
>/g Because I like to make fun of Nigel fags but sometimes I give solid and real advice. The advice thread is also nice and the nonnas are more nice compared to the vent and confession thread on /ot.
>/snowI am not interested in in lolcows, so I don’t bother. But I like the MTF and FTM thread because I like making fun of grannies and their stupid shit. I scroll the polyamory thread sometimes too.
I tried going into XX but I found it too retarded and edgy kek.
No. 2508516
File: 1746239908131.jpeg (534.92 KB, 1179x545, IMG_5848.jpeg)

Why would stud poker be better for fewer players than draw poker?
No. 2508538
>>2508489Yeah! I have been taking spiro off and on, just for acne but I have been forgetting to take it some days and I think accidentally taking it twice on some days. I bet that’s it! Thanks anon, for pointing out something that perhaps is kind of obvious!
>>2508519Don’t worry anon, I just in a literal sense don’t have any money right now but I will get some financial aid for my summer classes in a couple of weeks and then I will go!
No. 2508715
File: 1746255224111.png (5.08 KB, 249x203, thonk.png)

Relating to the topic of the orgasm gap. If a woman makes a man orgasms during sex (vaginal, oral, handsy, whatever) but the man couldn't do the same for the woman no matter how hard he tried—should she be compensated for the nut she gave him? For example, money or gifts or physical services like doing the laundry or cooking for her.
I'm framing this from a boyfriend/girlfriend or married couple scenario—not sex where the man is supposed to pay (like escorts or prostitutes).
No. 2508728
>>2508692>>2508694Doesn't the US have squatter laws or whatever it's called where someone can decide
lol this is mine now if you leave your house unattended for too long and don't throw them out in time? At least that's what I understood Margo attempted to claim lmao
No. 2508776
>>2508715I don't think you she be in a relationship with someone that can't give you an orgasm on a regular basis. It's okay if you can't orgasm once in a while, but if he's consistently unable to bring you to orgasm then he's not sexually compatible with you.
Why can't men ever pleasure a woman for the sake of her pleasure without thinking of his orgasm? Why can't a man just perform oral sex on a woman without thinking of what he'll get in return, in the same way that men expect oral sex from their partners?
Sex is incomplete without an orgasm. We are exposed to almost endless propaganda, whether it be through film, television, literature, social interactions, or unconscious cultural effects, that the female orgasm is less worthy than the male orgasm. The male orgasm is expected, central, mundane; but the female orgasm is sought, peripheral, rare. This state of affairs is unnatural and artificial.
If you don't enjoy sex with someone, then don't have sex with them. If you don't enjoy sex with your boyfriend or husband, then leave him and find someone else. Thinking about sex in terms of transaction, e.g., "how can I be repaid for this later?" is perverse and profane. It defeats the purpose of sex entirely: which is not to
pay and be
repaid, but to
give and be
given. No. 2508783
File: 1746261542028.png (3.78 MB, 1170x2532, IMG_2296.png)

>>2508776Thank you Amazonian nonna
No. 2508854
>>2508715>money or gifts or physical services like doing the laundry or cooking for herHe should be doing these things already in addition to giving her orgasms.
>>2508776>The male orgasm is expected, central, mundane; but the female orgasm is sought, peripheral, rare. This state of affairs is unnatural and artificial.Agree completely. Many straight women say that they feel too much pressure to orgasm and that's why they forgo it, but I think it's because 99% of the time, they aren't attracted to their partner. They feel guilty making him put in the effort when they know it isn't going to happen with the selfish dumb uggo they picked.
No. 2509210
File: 1746296671889.jpeg (389.78 KB, 1200x900, 2799795153.jpeg)

>>2509202Have you thought about categorizing your friends into identifiable physical and intellectual categories to find out if there's any connection between them?
No. 2509218
File: 1746296865252.webp (42.69 KB, 1024x1024, image_655eeb72-2b32-478a-9f80-…)

Is your region's dominant cream soda brand pink or clear?
No. 2509277
>>2509218There's pink cream soda?
It's off white where I live