[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password (For post deletion)

Apply as Administrator
Apply as Farmhand


File: 1618577424910.jpg (82.27 KB, 671x761, 6f04c1491c4ce2b53a7bd37182bd39…)

No. 21723

A thread for actual complaints and suggestions staff will actually take the time to read. Filling the thread with spam or your personal vendettas will result in an immediate ban from /meta/. Coming here to pretend you didn't evade a permaban will result in another permaban. This thread may also be used in an emergency when abuse material is posted. Take technical questions to the appropriate thread.
This thread is not for:
- "can you ban this anon?"
Use the report system and don't waste our time.
- "Can you lock this thread because I don't personally like it?"
Use the fucking hide thread feature. If the thread violates a global or board rule then use the report system.
- "Bring back a banned topic!"
No.
- "Hi cow! Hi scrote!"
No.
If you complain about a ban, at least post the actual ban in question. You can also always appeal or email admin@lolcow.farm if you want the matter discussed in private.

No. 21725

Admin, you used to say that the GC anons were "racist" and that's why you hated them but now we are "sjws"? That's why you gave a star to that copypasta-looking post? You can't seriously complain about "sjws" while going around and accusing people of being "racist" towards you or whatever. Nobody even was anyway.

No. 21728

Please ban the scrote that's posting those fucked up gifs, thank you

No. 21729

File: 1618586093143.gif (1.82 MB, 387x498, 03595da846cd49e9574f84c8d6cec4…)

>>21728
Thank you jannies!!! Bless you all

No. 21732

File: 1618597142560.jpeg (220.03 KB, 750x885, A368AD9B-68FF-4245-9726-C4E873…)

Dumbest ban I’ve ever received. Care to explain why?

No. 21733

>>21732
Read the rules and find out.

No. 21734

>>21733
Doesn’t qualify as infighting when it was a shit thread. Mods will make any excuse to ban anyone.

No. 21735

I think this thread is unnecesary, I'll be reporting it as a double.

No. 21736

>>21723
>A thread for actual complaints and suggestions staff will actually take the time to read.
I'm sorry does that mean you never read the other one?

>You can also always appeal or email admin@lolcow.farm if you want the matter discussed in private.

Actual complaint: no one ever responds in that email

No. 21737

Just give this site to someone else already

No. 21738

>>21725
yeah what exactly does GC/PP have to do with sjws? isn't it essentially the opposite?

No. 21739

>>21736
It means that the previous thread was clogged with infighting and other off-topic garbage that made it harder to read actual complaints and emergency reports.

No. 21740

File: 1618610642570.gif (87.16 KB, 220x165, admin in her room.gif)

>>21739
holy shit you're actually awake

No. 21741

File: 1618615132269.png (76.86 KB, 570x625, shit.png)

Proof mods don't even research the bans: the thing I posted isn't kpop. And it was on the dumbass shit thread because it was dumbass shit. Is this hellweek? This was a minor offense. Seriously.

No. 21742

>>21741
nonnie your ip is showing
just take the two hour ban, it's not that long

No. 21743

>>21741
Your appeal was accepted hours ago.

No. 21744

>>21742
It's okay the internet boogeyman won't come and kill me in my sleep

No. 21745

>"can you ban this anon?"
This is what happens when multiple people are reporting an anon but nothing gets done about it and said anon continues to samefag, ban evade and shit up a thread

No. 21749

>>21736
>no one ever responds in that email

That's not true. I reached to admin on that email when my IP was banned on accident through VPN stuff some months ago and she answered within an hour.

No. 21752

>>21741
I couldn't imagine being this pressed over a 2 hour ban honestly, especially when what you posted was indeed annoying and could've been anywhere else besides dumbass shit thread. Why'd you make multiple separated posts like that as if we truly care about it? Why'd you bold it like that? Even if it is "jpop" why didn't you post it in /m/ where it belonged?

No. 21756

I was a baiting sperg and expected to be banned for that but I got banned for ban evasion because the farmhand thought I was the anon banned above despite me just making a joke that I'll be banned like she was. In fact I was a separate degen. Sorry for causing confusion.

No. 21757

The last thread devolved into infighting and stayed a mess because admin and co just checked out and stayed out. It could've been fixed with some attention and (gasp) actually deleting shit but nah, just let it crash and burn then write a new thread that will be totally different. Just like the last one was going to be totally different.
Just give up already, admin. You burned out quite a while ago and it really shows. Either embrace the fail or move on to greener pastures.

No. 21758

>>21757
Stop bullying admin, you've got threads upon threads of cows to bully, go contribute

No. 21760

Exactly how much time must pass before a thread is considered "dead"? Not the OP but I was surprised to see someone get dinged for necroing after 6 days.
>>831629

No. 21761

>>21760
I'm retarded sorry

>>>/pt/831629

No. 21762

Fuck you and everyone else who posts here you are undeserving of everything i hope you all kill yourselves

No. 21763

>>21762
take it to the vent thread babe

No. 21764

>>21760
If a cow from a while back does something milky is it too late to post because they've been dry for too long? I guess them doing one milky thing after weeks of nothing is pretty boring but if an old cow was consistently doing something could they be necro'd?

No. 21765

>>21763
You spelt scrot wrong.

No. 21766

>>21762
What’s upset you hun

No. 21768

File: 1618808781164.jpg (77.09 KB, 1024x790, D2sfa3ZX4AAa1A7.jpg)

>>21758
>bullying

No. 21770

>>21764
I thought it was anything irrelevant after 30 days is considered a nerco. Pretty sure you can bump the thread if you're not bumping it with aids.

No. 21771

File: 1618846699104.jpg (138.5 KB, 1036x584, theydoitforfree.jpg)

>>21770
I would have assumed 30 days but apparently that isn't the case.

>>>/pt/831629

No. 21772

>>21771
Even still learn to embed and not just pay a link asking if people have seen it. What is the context? Is it her video or someone else why is it relevant or is it off topic?

No. 21773

>>21772
Looks like some retarded youtube commentary that I didn't watch. As the red text was for necro and not stupid shit no1curr or learn2embed my question is simply "how long before something qualifies as a thread necro". I don't specifically care about that post.

No. 21775

>>21773
NTA. People have explained to you that's it's NOT NECRO if the post is valuable information such as a relevant video, which is what >>21772 was saying. So it wouldn't matter if it was 3 years before the last post or 3 months: if it's relevant, it won't be necro'd. Had that user embedded and we actually knew more information on the video besides some link and "it involves kiki", it probably wouldn't have been redtexted.

Other people have answered your real question already. 30 days is usually it, but more on the otgm boards. I've seen shorter necros on pt/snow/w because usually it's the cows themselves trying to remain relevant. (Hence why sometimes you get necro spammers)

Drop the attitude, people are actually trying to answer your question– not attack you, moron.

No. 21776

>>21775
lol calm down, you read an awful lot of emotion into my post that wasn't there. Thanks for answering my question.

No. 21777

>>21776
nigga you kept getting answers so that anon had to spell it out letter for letter for you. glad to see you finally comprehended it.

No. 21779

File: 1618868295688.gif (484.55 KB, 800x450, 9ut.gif)

>>21775
>Drop the attitude
>makes a big angry post
I love /meta/

No. 21780

>>21777
NTA but it's weird that a post was called necro after a few days. If the thread is active it's not necro.

No. 21784

>>21779
There's a difference between sounding the way I sounded when an anon is being Big Dummy vs asking a question and getting snippy when people answer it for you.
>As the red text was for necro and not stupid shit no1curr or learn2embed my question is simply
That's attitude if I've ever seen it.

>>21780
This is fair. Probs some newfag janny or something

No. 21786

File: 1618896354997.jpg (39.35 KB, 540x539, 80b.jpg)

>Admin makes new thread because the previous one was full of infighting and autism
>New thread fills with infighting and autism

No. 21787

Fictional CP/Beastality on /W/

No. 21788

>>21787
>Fictional CP

No. 21789

>>21788
Yes, Loli and animated drawings of CP acts. If you saw some you’d complain too because it’s disgusting.

No. 21792

>>21788
I'd rather know if it's IRL or just drawings since one is greatly worse than the other and illegal. At least I could still go to a board if it's just degenerate art vs what scrotes were spamming boards with if I clicked catalog.

No. 21793

Jackie posting in Vickys thread is amusing but shouldn’t she be verified?

No. 21794

Loli cp on /W/

No. 21796

Loli gore on /g/

No. 21797

Loli gore on /g/

No. 21798

Loli horse cp on /w/

No. 21803

loli gore on /w/

No. 21804

Annoying schizo spamming his ramblings everywhere. Newsflash scrote it isn't 2009 anymore. Also posted their keyboard vomit here >>>/snow/1213179

No. 21806

Someone is posting porn in /snow/

No. 21807

Dont you think its a little retarded that Jackie keeps getting banned in the Victoria Bella Morte thread? Shes a person who has lived with Vick and knows her personally. Not to mention Vick has been kind of dry lately and Jackie is one of the few people answering questions and giving consistent screen caps. I'm certain whatever mod banned her didn't look at the context of the post. Can't you verify her or something? Asking to her to integrate is a bit silly

No. 21808

File: 1619005961939.png (130.39 KB, 2718x230, Screen Shot 2021-04-21 at 07.5…)

>>21807
Here's an example of what I mean. This person was banned for "cowtipping" despite not being a farmer/knowing Victoria irl. At least get the person monitoring this thread to pay attention, you know?

No. 21809

>>21807
You guys always say this in hopes a mod knows where a cow lives to even try to traject who is posting with an IP anywhere close to where a cow might live. I don't know how you guys expect mods to identify who is posting unless its actually the same IP and the cow has posted before using that IP, but even then, a new device can change it too. And how would this disregard larping cow anons?

No. 21810

>>21809
I'm mostly commenting cause its annoying for Jackie to get banned every other day. Also shouldn't the context of the comment matter? Imo the only things that's important. I'm sure most people don't expect anyone to check everyone's IP

No. 21811

>>21810
Maybe Jackie should either integrate and then maybe email admin with verification. How would you expect admin to very someone solely based on their ip address?

No. 21812

>>21810
And what if they are using a VPN? Mods don't have a way to verify themselves. Asking them to is dumb as hell unless the person with that IP, and never posts outside their IP connection or uses a different device, sends their ID to a mod, its just always going to be tinfoil about who is posting. Maybe just stop saying hi cow. Someone not agreeing with you doesn't mean they are whiteknighting or that they are the cow.

No. 21813

>>21811
She can get a trip code. But she’s honestly should just follow the rules too

No. 21814

>>21813
Jackie has made it clear she has no intention to integrate and tbh I think she is low IQ Guelph trash like Vic and couldn't figure it out even if she wanted to.
I'd be fine with jannies letting her get away with it for milk purposes, but I also appreciate them slapping bans on retards posting.

No. 21817

>>21814
>I'd be fine with jannies letting her get away with it for milk purposes

its not like she reveals anything good. anon asks questions
>teeth bad?
>yes teeth bad
>stinky
>yes very

its never anything good just parroting what is asked and not even insight like people want to believe. the same who think this is revelatory are the types to believe mystics. its all what you want to hear.

No. 21818

Hello, I got doxxed and harassed and my social media was shared in one of the threads even though I have nothing to do with the drama. Please help me delete it.

No. 21819

>>21818
Link the threads here so we know which posts you're talking about.

No. 21820

>>>/snow/65297
It’s this one. Someone shared my Instagram and said really messed up things about me. I have nothing to do with the drama. The reason why I knew about this thread because I overwhelmingly received many threats on my personal Instagram account. Please help me delete it, thank you.

No. 21822

>>21820
>Note: Talking shit about you, calling you names, or screenshotting your social media pages is not stalking, is not against the rules, and is not illegal.

Oh and show us proof of these "threats" you received from a 6 year old thread.

No. 21823

File: 1619066563177.jpeg (142.25 KB, 1125x212, 28BE48C1-3AB0-4D78-B17D-8D674C…)

According to this rule : you’re not supposed to doxx and drag people who have nothing to do with the thread. I got Instagram messages that I deleted enventually. That person is calling me and my husband pedophiles it’s not just talking shit.

No. 21824

I do not own the depop mentioned. I have nothing to do with those people mentioned, the reason why I knew about this is because I received many messages on my Instagram account.

No. 21827

Petition to redtext all variations of _____fishing like we have for "triggered", "POC" and "nonny".

No. 21828

>>21823
you know, genuinely, i wish some of you ladies would stop poking shit. its a rule to not cowtip but its okay if you do it winky face if you dont revealhow you got insight. i have no clue why this chick was posted shes probable a dumb internet whore like the rest of them but too many people instigate shit i wish they would learn that some of the best shit comes from when you just leave people be. they make fools of themselves enough

No. 21829

>>21794
Use the report function instead of quadruple posting you autist. Gomen for minimod but Jesus Christ

No. 21830

>>21828
Uh… no. It means interactions with the cow to get milk or trigger milk too.

No. 21831

>>21830
stfu i know what it means, cowtipping, telling someone their being posted here. i guess my drunk ass was mad that some one you guys cant refuse interacting with people posted here just to get a reaction.

but that is exactly what you shouldnt do. too many people come here and get worked up over some stuff then message people and their family and friends and stuff. werent you there for shays drama with her sister or whatever.

No. 21832

>>21831
It's also manufacturing milk by interacting with a cow, not just mentioning lolcow. Learn2integrate

No. 21834

>>21831
>Belle pedosperg confirmed

Why don't mods ban you? Everything you post is garbage tinfoil and you're just trying to make milk when there isn't any by trying to stalk their family and post them, regardless of who the cow is on multiple boards.

No. 21835

>>21832
yes exactly what i said

No. 21836

>>21832
>too many people come here and get worked up over some stuff then message people and their family and friends and stuff.

its not just mentioning the farm i know. but the people who try to bait people into doing shit just because. messaging them or their family. linking their thread or just even bitching at them about why they suck. like think about the thread where that one streamer raped his girlfriend while live and people wouldnt leave his family alone and shit.

there is no way lolcow could get to where we functioned the same as when tumblr shoplifters were doxed but my whole complaint is that newfags poke cows and want to stir drama when there shoudlnt

>>21834
i dont go on /w/

No. 21837

>>21832
Technically that's poop-touching. Cowtipping was originally just used to describe "tipping off" cows about their threads, but now the phrase has kind of expanded to also include poop-touching.

No. 21838

>>21837
Poop touching came from LSA and the likes, it wasn't originally used here. This anon is right >>21832

No. 21839

>>21838
"Touching the poop" has been around for ages. I think it started on SomethingAwful.

No. 21840

>>21839
That's nice. Different board culture though, anon.

No. 21841

Someone make a new pro Ana scumbags thread pls it's at max reply limit & im retarded

No. 21842

Why is the new Venus angelic thread still in auto-sage?
I can understand for the previous threads because they were shit but the new one is better because all the scrotes and most moralfags left because she stopped posting on onlyfans.
Pls un-sage the new thread,TY

No. 21843

>>21842
also its kinda hard for other anons to find the thread about her since its in autosage.
I didnt even know there was a new thread about her until i skimmed through all the pages on /w/

No. 21844

>>21843
>>21842
The same reason your retards force all threads to be saged: tinfoiling, making up milk,putting in your "I think..", posting old milk.. You really can't see why? And you can find her thread just fine. She isn't that far down.

No. 21845

>>21843
>i skimmed through all the pages on /w/
just use the catalog

No. 21846

>>21844
How do you know that the people who made those posts are the same people who tinfoil and so on? Schitzo.

No. 21847

>>21846
I'm referring to why all her threads are autosaged. Might not be the same anons. I meant in general by anons who do these things.

No. 21848

Moralfags are fagging up the slutcasino/ruby mae thread with their infighting.

No. 21849

Anyone noticed that there seems to be a higher of influx of scrotes here lately?

No. 21850

>>21849
i haven't noticed more scrotes but definitely more unintegrated newfags sperging all over the place

No. 21851

>>21848
I know we're not supposed to complain here but they've been shitting up the thread for a day now and are still going despite reports.
Fyi if jannies don't know bc new thread, Subjects are 16+ and all info archived is publicly available. Some pearl clutching Karen figured out how to sage in thread.

No. 21852

cp in /g/

No. 21853

>>21850
They’re not on pt the scrotes/pedos.
That leaves it for /g/ and /ot/. Aka old non farmers complaining about newer nonfarmers basically…retarded as fuck and also uninteresting as fuck. lol.

No. 21855

File: 1619395879498.jpeg (330.17 KB, 750x1064, 16F3098B-A2E7-42A9-ACC9-FAE124…)

Unreasonable ban, plus doesn’t make any sense (also I think you’re racist)
global rule #7:
>Do not instigate or engage in race related arguments. (racebaiting)


/ot/ rule # 7:

>Don’t go into a thread to complain about the exact same thread. Hide threads you don’t want to see and take topic complaints to /meta/.

No. 21856

>>21855
>posts a pic of shit to mock OP image instead of providing anything valuable to the thread
kek okay

No. 21858

So is anything going to be done about the tucker carlson derailing in the unconventional attractive thread? The whole photoshopping and "next Adam driver" thing is becoming annoying and derailing.

No. 21859

Two questions
Can we have random /pt/ and /snow/ Hell weekends/days? Or a long Hellweek soon? Plzzz admin

Also, is there a way to be a low key jannyor mandated reporter? Like I don't want to delve into /ot/ or be subjected to cp but I make a lot of reports of blogging, name fagging, infighting, non-sage contribution etc in the threads I'm familiar with in /pt/ and /snow/ and if there was a way to screen out the basic reports I'd be happy to be a basic click/accept/reject mod and leave the "fill in the blank" or questionable reports up to the next level.

There was a previous suggestion of a drop down menu for reporting of basic rule violations. I know it's coding but maybe it's something to consider? Leave basic "namefag" etc reports to low level jannies so mods can focus on real shit?

No. 21860

>>21858
>t. shanefag

No. 21861

>>21859
How about you get a fucking life and log off for once?

No. 21862

>>21858
Why don’t you read the fucking description of this thread, you absolute mongoloid.

No. 21863

>>21859
What the fuck

No. 21864

>>21858
It's /g and the unconventional dudes you find attractive thread.

Let people enjoy things. I mean do you need to talk discuss that many important things in there? I feel like the thread is actually a lot of fun so far.

No. 21865

>>21862
You're so mad about this and for what?

No. 21866

>>21864
Except at this point, it has become a derail and people are rarely posting unconventionally attractive males. They're fanfic-ing about tucker and whatever else retards. Go check for yourself. It's become a derail.

No. 21867

File: 1619442402163.jpg (1.23 MB, 972x5220, Screenshot_20210426-090452_Chr…)

>>21866
samefag. Hmm… I read thread description…. says "post unconventional males" not "fanfic discussion about what unconventional males would do and derailing."

No. 21868

>>21867
You know that phrase “be the change you wish to see in the world”? Well, post the males you wish to see in the thread, and stfu.

No. 21869

>>21866
If people don't post enough unconventional attractive men as it is, why not let Anons have their fun? It's literally a thread on lolcow on /g not a class at university where you should stay on topic or a thread on a certain cow in /pt or whatever. If people want to talk about their Tucker Carlson fantasies why not. The thread hasn't been this active since forever. So post some dudes or hide the thread

No. 21870

>>21858
Ohohoho, so you consider Tucker to be mainstream attractive? So do I, dude, but nobody else seems to think so.

No. 21871

>>21870
The toppest of the keks I'd expect nothing less from tucker anon
Anyway so like whats the general stand on the current state of the thread?

No. 21872

>>21858
Probably the autism will die down in a few days but I agree that thread basically turned into the retarded shitpost thread

No. 21873

>>21869
>>21867
>>21858
He's a political figure, it's obviously bait.

No. 21874

>>21858
Yeah it's annoying. That thread is probably one of my favorites on /g but I feel that some of the fun has been taken out of it when anons are essentially namefagging and shitposting. But I agree with the other anons that we should just leave it be. People will just shitpost harder if you tell them to stop.

No. 21875

>>21874
shitposting makes threads more fun tbh

No. 21876

Mods, will we ever get the kpop containment threads back? I don't even follow kpop but I enjoyed reading through through threads and it seems many anons miss them, maybe they could have a trial thread to see they can behave?

No. 21877

>>21850
>>21849
I feel like there's been a big increase in single-word replies of "cringe" or "based". The words are fine I guess, I mean I use the former especially, but if that's all you have to say it usually doesn't contribute much to discussion and can feel lazy and repetitive when you see it a lot. Some of these posts are unsaged; these are likely newfags doing a "hello fellow imageboard users". Again the words themselves are fine and even the one word posts like that can be fine and made by otherwise contributing farmers but idk just something I've noticed last few weeks

No. 21878

>>21876
You can use the new k-imageboard since K-pop was banned on crystal.cafe
https://choachan.cafe/

No. 21879

>>21878
Thanks for letting me know, I will

No. 21881

Vtuber shitspergs are posting in the twitch thread now. Please stop this cancer from spreading.

No. 21882

cp in /pt/

No. 21884

>>21877
I thought it was me being an autist so I kept silent and didn't report but yeah, the one liners like "based" or "cringe" are annoying (the latter being everywhere on LC these days)
Imo, it isn't much different than just writing "kek" "lol" and nothing else.

No. 21885

File: 1619522203026.png (645.75 KB, 865x819, 1619285732489.png)

>>21881
>Vtuber shitspergs are posting in the twitch thread now. Please stop this cancer from spreading.

No. 21887

Mods, might want to wrangle in the vendetta posters in the Belle thread. They are on a nitpicking fit and now doing this retarded sperging because not every anon thinks she's ugly and finds nitpicking milk. Also the constant "hi belle"ing >>>/w/147443

No. 21888

File: 1619546124367.jpg (205.96 KB, 1080x541, Screenshot_20210427-105019_Sam…)


No. 21889

>>21888
>>21885
what's with all the terrible cringey reaction images lately?

No. 21890

>>21889
Males.

No. 21891

>>21890
That's nasty

No. 21893

Can mods please take the actual time to deal with WKs and active derailers in the Belle thread instead of constantly catering to the WKs?

Not sure if stuff hasn’t been done since sometimes the bans aren’t red texted, but it’s like the same person coming to the thread to call everyone jealous and mean/nitpicky because they aren’t praising the cow, but consistently revisits to complain, derail, and topic police. I’ve only noticed people across the aisle getting slapped with red text and not the active sus WK who complains in meta AND thread about no milk or what is or isn’t qualifying as milk.

>>21887
Like this user. Who’s clearly a WK and probably same anon from last meta complaint thread.

It’s getting honestly exhausting trying to read with the WKs consistently in thread and people just baiting them to further derailment for luls. Jfc

Thankfully there’s new milk now, but holy kek please do something about the whiny WK for once. Please and thank you ♥

No. 21894

>>21887
Can mods reveal the post ID of the belle white knight? I think it will be really funny.

No. 21895

>>21893
This. Belle thread has a WK who attacks everyone posting there.

No. 21899

someone wrangle the spergs in celebricows already

No. 21900

Jaelle (pretending not to be Jaelle) is shitting up the Nika & Jaelle thread, mods please help

No. 21901

Where is the fucking mods in Ashley’s/Maddies thread??? There’s this one sperg there that won’t stfu and they need to be banned yesterday

No. 21902

>>21901
I’ve been reporting them for 4 hours, must be farmhands day off

No. 21904

>>21902
some spergs ban evade. its not terribly hard but its a good indicator of autism

No. 21905

>>21904
Yeup. It’s made worse when people won’t stop playing into them and getting triggered/replying. Which is exactly what’s happening in the Ashley/maddie thread. Someone should post that “this is bait” pic kek

No. 21906

>>21893
Not agreeing she's ugly isn't whiteknighting and not thinking filters is milk isn't either. You guys go on tangents, nitpicking the same old photos every thread and having nothing new to say. That rape anon isn't me being a whiteknight to report. It was straight autistic embarrassment. cope

No. 21907

File: 1619587446169.jpeg (74.08 KB, 514x333, D5B9611E-D58C-4E2D-9F26-4704D5…)

>>21906
Hmmm, you’re rather heavily invested in this aren’t you dear?

No. 21908

>>21887
The Belle thread is always so embarrassing, you can taste the desperation and jealousy from some of these posters who have to upload the same unflattering photo every thread, insist she’s actually not making money, and go as far as edit wrinkles onto her to prove she’s busted. It’s just the same criticisms day in and day out meanwhile she hasn’t even been active since february when she plugged that keyboard collab. There’s some photo of her at a theme park now which is the first droplet of skim milk in months.

No. 21909

>>21908
Can you show me the photos where they’ve “edited wrinkles” on to her? Or have they just posted pics of her unfiltered face?
I agree her looking fat at Alton towers isn’t milk, but is it really worth sperging to meta about?

No. 21910

File: 1619587980448.jpeg (1.25 MB, 3024x4030, DAE5F52E-09FB-429F-9F46-B4FBE3…)

>>21906
You’re literally triggered enough by people calling her ugly that you came to complain here and call it nitpicking/vendetta posting (some were, validly - but not all). Take your own advice and cope. You’re heavily WKing Belle in the thread with ridiculous logic that easily gets countered, and so here you are crying for farmhands.

Suspiciously invested or just that much of a WK - who knows.

No. 21911

>>21910
What logic? That I don't think she's ugly but you do, so I must be wrong? You sound so unhinged about being reported. Lol

No. 21912

>>21907
It's so cringy and telling when anons are posting together or device hopping because this retarded ass patting always happens amongst the vendetta posters. You fags did this in the nicole thread too and mikan thread.

No. 21913

>>21910
It’s really weird, I feel like the constant accusations that people are purposely editing her to look worse or that everyone in the thread is a failed sex worker vendetta chan would get shot down immediately in threads on other photoshop addicted OF cows like PNP or Shayna, and it’s not like everyone behaves in those threads either. People definitely need to stop responding to the bait but this feels like an obvious case for banning the autist(s) posting about how much of a disney princess she naturally looks like and picking fights. Would be nice to just get a response from the farmhands about why it’s not happening?

No. 21914

>>21911
Not the anons reported, but honestly not interested in WK tirades and frankly sick of reading white knight anons derail the thread consistently since the previous one. You’re upset about them not finding Belle’s filtered image attractive. Sounds a bit hypocritical of you to cry about them not finding the same about your thoughts. Circular logic imo. This isn’t a fansite so idk what you think this is..? Posters full of jealousy and desperation? That reeks of white knight logic. Sorrynot sorry.

Here’s to hoping mods take note. The WKs are ruining all of the Belle threads imo. Afaik I’ve only ever seen one WK get slapped with the cry in meta red text, but here we are.

Please mods, this is getting annoying to read through with constant WK and bait.

No. 21915

>>21913
There's literally an anon who mentions they are an ex sexworker who has tried warning girls of the DaNgErS of sex work. So yeah, that's why people are calling the sperg anon an failed sex worker. Also keeps mentioning how they couldn't dare degrade themselves. They outted themselves and keeps self blog posting.

No. 21916

>>21914
The issue is you can comment that you don't think something looks bad after anons caption a photo with how much they hate her and then anons flock to demand you think she looks ugly and you must agree because look at this photo of a rat and her. Come on.

No. 21917

>>21915
God you are such an embarrassing retard.have a day off.

No. 21918

>>21916
I can see the other side of that, and it sometimes is the nature of the bull on LC - but it’s like a moment of reading the room prior to making a comment of that nature?

No. 21919

>>21917
They keep self posting about their experience and even said they were on/in magazines. Why are you mad? Lol

No. 21920

>>21918
And what if I posted a photo saying she looked nice? This may be a gossip site, but its not a straight up hate site. I'm indifferent about her, but anons literally put a stop at any praise because they are so hell bent on proving how old and ugly she is just from a simple "I don't think she looks that bad here." Then spam the same photo repeatedly. Or bring up some rando pedo she has on facebook to prove a point that isnt there and trying to say his drama is her's just to force tinfoil milk.

No. 21921

>>21915
I’m not a regular in the thread, pretty sure the only time I’ve posted in the current one for her was to say I don’t think we can assume she’s getting fat off that one picture, but glancing through it now that everyone is shitting up meta because of it, I don’t think she’s the only one who doesn’t find belle attractive thats getting called a failed sex worker vendetta chan. She also got redtexted for her blogposting, so I’m not sure what else you want farmhands to do about her.

No. 21922

Take the fucking belle sperging back to your containment thread god damn

No. 21923

>>21921
Nothing. I'm responding to the anon saying anons are referencing an anon who is one. Some anons are identifiable, so looks like they just refer to their posts as that anon. They have posted after the redtext too.

No. 21924

>>21919
Literally one person said that one time. Stop lying/exaggerating
>“They keep saying it! They’re all doing it! Admin!!! Admin!!!! Admin PLEASE stop them!!!!”
Why are you so frantic? Why don’t you have a nice cuppa tea and some biccys. Take a break.

No. 21925

>>21922
Sorry, anon. Just needed mods to get a real glance that the crybaby WK was the real consistent issue in the thread. Back to containment we go.

No. 21926

>>21925
>>21924
Good you need help.

No. 21927

>>21926
KEK. You’re the one who obviously needs help. You’re the one with a deranged obsession. So we don’t think belle is a beautiful intelligent businesswoman, and is instead homely and stupid. So what? Cry about it.
>ok failed sex worker!!!
>ok! Seethe jealous femcel!!!
>omg go get help!
>omg cope!!
You literally lurk the thread every single day.

No. 21928

>>21927
No one said any of that. All anons have been saying is that her nose looks fine and some photos aren't ugly.

No. 21929

>>21928
You’re the one complaining that “nobodies allowed to say she looks pretty!”
Well…nobodies allowed to say she DOESNT look pretty according to you? Nobodies allowed to say her nose job is a failure and looks like shit. Nobodies allowed to call her bf fat. Why is that? Why are you so invested? I literally promise you, if you stop shitting up the thread, it will die. People literally just want to bait you into a meltdown because it’s so easy and you’re unhinged.

No. 21930

>nobodies

No. 21931

>>21930
Belle is washed up, fat and ugly.

No. 21932

This WK cries about it whenever anons send any unfiltered photo of Belle. Some anon claimed Belle looks like a Pixar character with heavily filtered photos and other anons posted her real face to show she doesn't.

No. 21933

>>21929
honestly, I’m kind of tired of this bait and switch with the WK. It’s just constant derailment with twisted misconstrued logic. Usually WK shenanigans.

It will never end…even here.

No. 21934

>>21933
Reveal the poster I.D like they did when Erin was shifting up her own thread.

No. 21935

>>21932
I don't think you understand what a whiteknight is

No. 21936

>>21935
coming to the defense of a cow and calling people desperate and jealous for not thinking she looks attractive or calling out a cows differences between her filtered shoops and candids is most definitely WK behavior.

No. 21937

>>21935
A white knight is someone who relentlessly brigades a thread standing up for a cow. That’s you. You’re a white knight.

No. 21938

Please put out farmhand applications if u guys need help, the lack of mods is very obvious right now

No. 21939

>>21938
seconding this. i've seen multiple threads in desperate need of wrangling the past few days - like the totally-not-jaelle sperg who's been going at it for the past 48 hours on the jaelle/nika thread. it's getting genuinely embarrassing at this point

No. 21941

Mods answer question plz


I find Dua Lipa to be very overrated, don't get me wrong, if I woke up tomorrow looking exactly like her my ugly ass would be delighted!kek but as a celebrity I don't understand why everyone says she's so beautiful, her lack of carisma doesn't help one bit.(BPD)

No. 21944

>>21941
>carisma

Kek.

No. 21946

>>21941
anon you should have kept this retarded sperg in the discord….

No. 21947

Can we get hellweek going? And include the offtopic boards too?

No. 21948

why are we getting a new admin? I feel like there's a lack of communication lately.

No. 21949

>>21948
>lately

No. 21950

>>21948
I can only hope admin screens the applicants properly. You just know the scrotes and trannies would love to weasel their way into the position and fuck everything up.

No. 21951

>>21950
she'll probably pick a scrote because she hates us

No. 21952

>>21947
Why offtopic too?
Not that I'm inherently against ist just wondering

No. 21953

>>21952
OT isn't exempt from other board rules which people think it is which is the issue.

No. 21954

>>21947
Seconded. Good lord, we need another hellweek.

No. 21955

>>21953
it's called off topic for a reason tho. what else could possibly be banned, it actually seems chill now

No. 21956

>>21951
>>21950
>>21948
I just checked the application and it doesn't even have a section asking which sex the applicant is, like that's not important to consider.

No. 21957

>>21956
Are you implying I would take someone's word for it solely based off the application?

No. 21959

>>21957
Some scrotes unaware of and ignorant to this board's culture and demographic may be retarded enough to fill in their sex honestly thinking it will work in their favour, considering the position requires knowledge in programming language which is (unfortunately) male dominated. So I can see scrotes proudly adding "male" to their application thinking it will make their programming ability and application in general, perceived as superior and more likely to be selected. Adding sex selection to the application could help weed out scrotes and act as a trap because since when do males ever fail to announce they own a dick and balls.

Of course how the application fields are filled and the writing style may be easy to identify if applicant is a scrote or not, but adding sex options could potentially make it even easier since a lot of scrotes' pride in being male will make them write it. That's what I theorise anyway.

No. 21960

>>21959
Don't backtrack now

No. 21961

File: 1619735340208.png (348.49 KB, 1080x1164, 1616800683926.png)


>Some scrotes unaware of and ignorant to this board's culture and demographic may be retarded enough to fill in their sex honestly thinking it will work in their favour, considering the position requires knowledge in programming language which is (unfortunately) male dominated. So I can see scrotes proudly adding "male" to their application thinking it will make their programming ability and application in general, perceived as superior and more likely to be selected. Adding sex selection to the application could help weed out scrotes and act as a trap because since when do males ever fail to announce they own a dick and balls.


>Of course how the application fields are filled and the writing style may be easy to identify if applicant is a scrote or not, but adding sex options could potentially make it even easier since a lot of scrotes' pride in being male will make them write it. That's what I theorise anyway.

No. 21962

>>21961
>Retarded cringey reaction image
>Doesn't know how to sage
Scrote much.

>>21960
I have no idea what you mean.

No. 21963

>>21723
I was banned and told lrn2 embed and sage after I posted a relevant video link in a thread.
Leaving aside the rudeness of the latter request, I suggest site admins automatically embed video links if they are going to be this anal about it. This should not be something that requires instructions in 2021.

No. 21965

>>21963
or just integrate instead of boohoo’ing about being too retarded to embed a video on an image board?

No. 21966

>>21965
if they didn't want suggestions then this thread could easily not exist, being an asshole unnecessarily is very moid of you

No. 21967

>>21966
what's the suggestion though? be nicer? do you know where you are?

No. 21968

>>21967
the suggestion is add automatic embedding, jesus fucking christ. You really want to tell me I'm retarded for not wanting to have to manually embed a video while you can't even read a three-sentence comment fully?

No. 21969

>>21968
Hey scrote, this isn't 4chan. It's laid out this way to weed out idiots like you.

No. 21971

>>21963
no, lrn2 embed

No. 21974

Some newfag is still shitting up the June thread with unsaged non-milk posts repeating things that have already been said a million times. Has been told to learn how to sage SERVERAL times and just refuses to do it. Please deal with this shit I have reported it so many times.

No. 21975

Admin is giving it to someone new? Good.

No. 21977

>>21975
Maybe after this admin dips we can get a less Twitter-pilled staff

No. 21979

>>21977
Hopefully we can have our fucking MANHATE thread back

No. 21980

>>21977
We can only hope, but I'll remain cynical until I see it

No. 21981

>>21979
keeping my fingers crossed like you have no idea

No. 21982

>>21981
>>21979
I don't think it will happen, but if there's anyone who can code…

No. 21983

>>21979
Why don't the three of you who are so desperate for it just go make a discord or something?

No. 21984

>>21979
Why do you even need it? You people make every thread a manhate thread anyway

No. 21986

>>21979

>>21979
Don’t lump me in with you faggot. Manhate, allowing Twitter to take over and tempcow ruined the site. I hate men but shoo

No. 21987

>>21986
No you’re so right. Tempcow really was the beginning of the end for some reason.

No. 21988

>>21986
PULL shutting down didn’t help either

No. 21989

>>21956
Come on anon give admin some credit. I'm sure she'll ask for pictures of applicant's forearms for verification and pick the most femme looking one.

No. 21991

>>21989
I mean, why not. It should have a section where a legit photo of the shoulder/ clavicles or hands and wrists are uploaded for sex identification purposes.
I want a scroteless lolcow. It's what we deserve.

No. 21992

>>21991
hairline check

No. 21993

>>21987
It allowed unintegrated users to get the balls to post on a chan type board regularly. munchies doxing themselves, the weird types pixilocks brings in, trans were able to police discussion about sex you name it. i mean, it was nitpick city and just an unregulated shithole that never should have happened. id have rather the site went down for awhile and people who were here for a lark to just fucking leave instead of get their bearings and do exactly what this place became.

>>21992
we can only wish

No. 21996

>>21993
Yeah exactly and unfortunately it happened to coincide with the peak of the onision/billie “I betrayed my wife” or whatever thing when there were so many new lurkers and the onision threads were full of underage/unintegrated posters who then seemingly started regularly posting during the tempcow fiasco. It was just the worst possible time for it to happen. I feel like things had already been going downhill a little before tempcow with the increase of cows from youtube and the audience that brought, but post tempcow it just seemed like there was a sharp decrease in quality with the userbase that never fully went back to normal. Then I think around 2018 also seemed like a major change with the various manhate type threads and users that attracted and that becoming extremely dominant across all boards which also never really seemed to die down.

No. 21998

Petition to move Celebricows back to /ot/ since everyone wants to treat it like it is anyway.

No. 21999

>>21996
>never really seemed to die down
in the last month or two it's ramped up by about 1000%

No. 22000

Cp on /W/

No. 22002

>>21986
>shoo
You shoo, you retarded fucking newfag.

No. 22003

Cp on W

No. 22004

>>21723
Cp on /w for almost half an hour

No. 22005

First time I've seen the suspected cp on lolcow (I avoid /pt where they normally post).

Pls delete the post on /w, farmhands

No. 22006

>>22004
>>22005
close your slashes

No. 22007

>>22006
Shutuppp you stupid fucking spastic kill yourself

No. 22008

>>22007
Seek help

No. 22009

>>22004
Just an FYI to anyone, the cp is gone

No. 22010

>>21998
Entering there and seeing anons just straight "1/10 would not fuck" celebrities and talking about their "saggy tits" is wild, it really should be on /ot/, so at least they can be called out without it technically being a derail

No. 22011

Long time lurker, moderately drunk poster. I'm always here around 3am to catch shitposting. Applued for hand. Vote for me!

No. 22012

thanks for moving celebricows to /OT/! it’s been a shit thread full of garbage nitpicking forever so i’m glad it’s finally out of /snow/

No. 22013

Did admin or farmhands archive the website (even if it's just before leaving) for the case of what happens after a new admin takes reign?
I'm sure LC also has to deal with a good bunch of legal cases, so it would be a shame if it would just disappear without a trace or backup in case of things going bad.

No. 22014

>>21999
I doubt it’s going to get better if the new admin is coming from the current userbase, there doesn’t seem to be any normal oldfags left at this point.

>>21738
>>21725
I don’t get how that’s remotely confusing. They’re sjw moralfags for what they perceive as misogyny (everything) and can’t accept anyone disagreeing with them but not for anything else. It’s a pretty common thing even irl for someone to be “prejudiced” in some way but also extremely sensitive about some perceived prejudice they experience.

No. 22015

>>22014
Why did you reply to me? That's exactly what I said in my comment, she is very sensitive about perceived injustices (which did not happen) while having the guts to call other people sjws.

No. 22016

>>21986
it's so funny to see unsaged retards who can't even format a post correctly accusing others of being new and ruining the site.
Admin was new to this site and tried to install a culture that was counter to the one already here. It backfired. She was never cutout to be admin if you want to be blunt about it since she admitted to fucking CRYING over being called a tranny on here by random anons.

>>22014
this is the exact type of newfaggotry i mean. wtf are you even talking about? radfems are 2nd wave feminists. sjw intersectional feminism is 3rd wave. insult radfems all you want but at least be correct in what you say. sjw is identity politics while radfems are squarely against because they view women are a class because of their belief that sex is unchangeable. Sjw doesn't just mean "anyone that talks about social issues" you smegma stained dumbas.

You people think you're slick coming in here from twitter/PULL/Reddit, pretending you've been here all along and it's the mean radfems/racists/facists/women that call doja cat's tits saggy/whatever your buzzword is for the day that's "ruining" lolcow when the truth is it's these very fucking convos that are ruining it because dumb faggots like you can't just hide threads and MOVE THE FUCK ON.

Hate radfems? Do what I did when they started pissing me off. I hide their fucking threads. But no little bitches like you wanted to cry and moan until the threads were gone. Now it's how many fucking years later and we're still having this convo? The threads are gone and it's STILL not enough for some of you whiney cunts. It's even funnier that admin caters to you deluded morons. You're complaining X group sees everything as an attack while you complain about fucking threads that have been gone YEARS.

So now we have threads because shut down/moved/denied and even the new ones are full of 20 newfags demanding to know why THIS cow has a thread because they're not even interesting anyway. lolcow is dead. And you are the reason. Not nazis, radfems, the media, onision or anyone -fucking -else. It was you and your pathetic fucking agenda.

No. 22017

>>22016
Did you just ignore all the talking points mentioned earlier? Problems existed way before the last 2 years and it's also the change within internet culture and cows.

No. 22018

>>21998
That thread is a mess, full to the brim with Twitterfags, underage tards and gay scrotes from LSA:

>She's fat!

>No she's not!

>She's black!

>No she's not! Muh one drop!

>How do you do, fellow farmers! Lana del rey is fugly, isn't it!

> She's beautiful vendetta-chan, but go off I guess!

Nuke that thread.

No. 22019

>>22015
What she said on discord or whatever doesn’t actually affect the board, the post she that gave the star to was complaining about people acting like sjws in their actual posts here, which is obviously not the same thing. I don’t care if someone’s an sjw or not as long as they’re not sperging about it here. If you’re talking about what was said actually on lolcow, she said there was a problem with racebait in the pp thread which there was. I don’t think that’s being an sjw, racebait has always been banned and isn’t beneficial to the board overall.

>>22016
You are the one who seems new or just very autistic. Have you even read the posts that this relates to? What I was saying was that it was extremely obvious what that anon was talking about when they referred to sjw behaviour in that specific post. It’s very obvious that they were using the term to refer to things like moralfagging, sperging out whenever people disagree with them, going on self righteous political derailing rants. Having a meltdown about how technical thats not ‘the true definition of sjw’ or whatever is helpful to no one. It was very clear to anyone who’s not a literal sperg what they were referring to.

> You people think you're slick coming in here from twitter/PULL/Reddit, pretending you've been here all along and it's the mean radfems/racists/facists/women that call doja cat's tits saggy/whatever your buzzword is for the day that's "ruining" lolcow when the truth is it's these very fucking convos that are ruining it because dumb faggots like you can't just hide threads and MOVE THE FUCK ON.

Everyone who disagrees with you isn’t a newfag, I’ve been here since the beginning you can believe me or not. What thread do you want people to hide when they’re talking about problems that aren’t contained to any one specific thread and are prevalent across all boards? You’re an idiot if you think people in /meta/ complaining is the biggest issue with what’s ‘ruining’ lolcow. There have been problems with the site for years that just weren’t addressed.

>So now we have threads because shut down/moved/denied

Okay so what? There have always been threads that have been shut or banned for being low quality. Even all the way back in like 2014/2015 with the Berry thread. This is a good thing and there’s nothing wrong with shit quality threads or threads that attract undesirable users being closed.

>new ones are full of 20 newfags demanding to know why THIS cow has a thread because they're not even interesting anyway

Newfags asking to be spoonfed has literally always happened and you can just report them. Cows being less interesting now is just a result of how much internet culture has changed. If it’s happening more recently it’s probably at least somewhat because of how poorly written the OPs of certain recent threads are.

No. 22020

>>22019
Just today there was more racebait tit sperging about black women in the celebcows thread

No. 22021

>>22016
Based.

No. 22023

>>22016
cute, but continually applying a fresh bandaid wont fix the issue. hiding threads and parsing out definitions wont address the deeper issue, the infection will spread once those posters keep getting away with their retarded behavior. thats why i brought up tempcow. a containment thread or board will only work for so long or so well. thats why all this weird belle shit has gotten so rough or posters >>22007 like this get emboldened to move out of their hidey hole. go ahead and continue to call people newfags when theyre not immediately agreeing with you but nothing you offered is a solution.

No. 22024

>>22023
What shit with the belle thread? Stop bringing it up or we’re gonna go bait it some more

No. 22025

>>22016
Based. I wish people would just stfu complaining. If they do then the least they could do is make it fucking funny.

Also saying “nigger” isn’t racist, neither is saying “kike” “spic” “paki” “cave demon” “chink” or “curry scented bitch” go back to twitter.

Also you will NEVER ban the words retard or faggot on an image board you retarded faggot

No. 22026

>>22020
Sperg going on about black women and their bodies is back in the celeb thread and people won't ignore him

No. 22027

>>22025
Literally zero people have been asking for any of those words to be banned

No. 22028

>>22025
This is some really stupid bait.

No. 22029

>>22028
the bait has been a lot worse lately. like 14-year-old scrote level.

No. 22030

>>22028
It is. Wasn't even relevant to anything anyone said.

No. 22031

>>22029
Honestly, did Lolcow get heavily namedropped on 4chan or KF in the past month or something? I've never seen people Soyakposting here until now, in several threads, together with a bunch of posts who generally sound like completely unintegrated channers.

No. 22032

>>22031
There's literally a lc.farm thread on kf if you weren't aware.

No. 22033

>>22031
lolcow is always namedropped on 4chan and KF. We've had a retarded influx of men for 2 years now

No. 22034

>>22031
Well, what do you think.

No. 22035

>>22033
>for 2 years now
Nah, we've had that since forever.

No. 22036

>>22035
True. That's why we had a robot containment thread at the time.

No. 22038

>>22031
>>22029
>>22023
>>22018
>>21993
>>22014
>>22029
You people are the ones ruining lolcow IMO. You need your heads examined.

No. 22039

>>22038
>n-no you!

No. 22040

A mod needs to say something about the nitpicking in the Belle thread. All they do is post old photos repeatedly because "SHE DOESN'T LOOK LIKE HER FILTERS". Its spam at this point. Can we report it as spam and nitpicking?

No. 22041

>>22040
They just found out she is using tinder, which is on topic and milky, what are you talking about? Just leave the farmhands alone.

No. 22043

>>22041
Kek they got ban evade retexted. Knew they were.

No. 22045

We all know the last Manson thread descended into shit, but is there any interest in a new thread encompassing Manson, his orbiters and the bat shit crazy element that is Annie. So much - frankly hilarious - insanity has come to light since the thread died. I’d be happy to do the lord’s work if there is interest.

No. 22046

>>22040
Will you shut up about the Belle thread already?(ban evading)

No. 22047

>>22046
Why when mods see it too? 4 redtexts in under a day.

No. 22048

>>22040
Hide the fucking thread cunt(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 22049

>>22048
I don't know who's modding the thread, but blessed. Finally something is being done about the vendetta posting and nitpicking. The thread has 5 pieces of new milk and the rest are anons complaining about how ugly she is without without filters and the tinfoiling is ridiculous like her being a madam. Maybe just follow the rules, anon.

No. 22050

>>22049
How about you follow the rules and stop spamming the absolute fuck out of meta, obsessing over one thread, harassing admin every day. Since it bothers you so much we are all going to continue baiting and talking shit. Belle is ugly Josh is fat bye <3 and they both have herpes(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 22051

>>22049
Mods why don’t you ban the retarded white knight? Or reveal its poster ID. I think it will be highly unsurprising.

No. 22052

>>22050
>>22051
You guys already made it clear you have a discord group. Good for you I guess? Keep announcing your ban evading.

No. 22053

>>22052
Belle is ugly Josh is fat. You’ll never get your own way so stop swinging your retarded dick around.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 22054

Please do something about the e-girls thread, it’s about 6 threads late for an autosage

No. 22055

File: 1620066799273.jpeg (30.56 KB, 730x720, nxDmQnF.jpeg)

Just dropping in to say FUCK YOU to the jannies and good riddance to shitmin who won't let us have anything GC related.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 22056

>>22055
Do you ever stop to think maybe other users don't want that shit. Lolcow isn't your personal hivemind.

No. 22057

IMO discussion about tranny celebrities should be banned from the celebricows thread and contained in the tranny threads.

No. 22058

>>22057
Maybe, if the thread wasn't moved to /ot/

No. 22059

>>22057
Sounds like a good idea to me. The main talking point is always about their transness, it fits there.

No. 22061

>>22057
Yes I also think this would be better
>>22059
Why was it moved? Surely now that there’s no expectation for posts to have to be related to actual milk in some way and blogposting and derailing is technically allowed it’s only going to make the thread even worse. Genuinely asking bc I saw a lot of people asking for it to be moved back to /ot/ but don’t get why people thought that would make it better.

No. 22062

>>22061
that cesspool never belonged in /snow/

No. 22063

>>22062
Nta but how does move it to ot where there are less rules help? Seems like it'll be more of a cesspool there.

No. 22064

>>22062
Okay but now it’s just as much of a cesspool except with added blogposting from various anachans about their time in the psychiatric ward…

No. 22065

>>22045
Seconded. I don't give a shit about Manson but an Annie thread would be really great.
Girl is a massive cow and is milky af (her lies and photoshop would put Vicky Shingles to shame)
However, she definitely should be permaban first since she's known for samefagging/sock-pupetting like crazy and was largely responsible for the dumpster fire the Manson thread was (even posted a selfie holding a piece of paper with /snow written on it)

I'd like to make one myself but my English is quite shitty and I don't want to make a mess of an OP. Also, I don't know if admin/farmhands are ok with it, so…

No. 22066

>>22064
They'll blogpost anyway if anorexia is mentioned in any thread, by any cow or user. Plenty of "recovered" anachans are still in a constant competitive mindset and battle stance, it truly is a scary mental illness. You don't need to medfag, bring up the DSM-5 or talk about authentic psychward experiences to convince people that a 600-lbs woman isn't actually anorexic, but lord help you if you try to stand between an (ex-)anachan and her one time to talk about her special interest.

No. 22067

>>22064
Don't forget the constant bait

No. 22068

The camwhores and the e-girls thread should have all their images auto-spoilered. I had to hide both threads even tho they are sometimes interesting because people keep posting half or fully naked crackwhores without spoilers.

No. 22069

Can I get an explanation why you basically killed the celeb thread by moving it to /ot/? It is now unreadable.

No. 22070

File: 1620124847297.jpg (111.28 KB, 1080x883, Screenshot_20210504-123716_Sam…)

Can my ban be lifted, because I was not ban-evading. I always post on the same ip adress and don't even have a VPN. I will be careful what to post in belles thread from now on (the retarded tinfoil was a bit too much, I admit). Ban me for going overboard with my tinfoil, but not for something I did not do

No. 22071

>>22070
Pretty sure farmhand meant IF you banevade the next ban is perm

No. 22072

File: 1620125068631.jpg (254.52 KB, 1080x1848, Screenshot.jpg)

>>22070
Samefag, I was the anon who posted these messages.
I have never ban-evaded on lolcow, because that is a retarded thing to do.

No. 22073

>>22072
kek that's the dumbest tinfoil i've seen in a while.
you weren't accused of ban evading, they're saying you'll get banned forever if you try to ban evade.

No. 22075

>>22073
Maybe you're right, but still, a ban of 4 days for only a retarded tinfoil? I wasn't even the one nitpicking belle's appearance. I was even asking people to stop doing that. Oh well, I'll just wait it out I guess, but it sucks and feels unfair

No. 22076

>>22075
tranny janny is right on this one, the belle thread is a smoldering pile of shit and you aren't helping by further shitting on top of the pile

No. 22077

>>22066
Yeah and btw, "anorexia" should be red texted.

No. 22078

what’s with everyone confused about celebricows being in /ot/ when that’s originally where it was? it was only moved to /snow/ when /ot/ was gone for that short while.
and anyone that thinks the subject matter was any better in /snow/ should just go back and read the first 50 posts of the most recent thread before it was moved kek.

No. 22080

>>22072
>>22070
You're so identifiable and if you don't use a VPN, you realize you're admitting these are your IPs that are banned. You have been evading, everyone in the thread can tell. I hope you get banned forever with your little group.

No. 22081

>>22078
come on nonny. can't you think a little bit? like, just think for 10 fucking seconds of your life as to why people would believe that celebricows originally belonged in /snow/ as opposed to /ot/?

No. 22082

File: 1620142346691.jpg (262.73 KB, 1080x815, Screenshot_20210504-083101_Sam…)

>>22080
Just to add, we all can tell this is you, anon, and its the only redtext under Tuesday atm.

No. 22083

File: 1620142940128.jpg (58.78 KB, 620x346, IMG_20210504_123950.jpg)

I know I ask this a lot, but it's because it's still a problem.
Please, redtext all bans so shit like this can be avoided. Also so we can see what's allowed and what isn't. There's literally no reason why only a few bans should be redtexted.

No. 22084

>>22083
They should absolutely be all redtext if its a rule break ban. I get it would clutter, but at least it sets examples of what lolcow won't put up with on the threads. Also the frequency that mods believe the "I-I've never shitpost, why am I banned with my IP?" stories need to stop being believed. I bet it happens, but not the frequency anons come here to complain about. It just unbans a lot of obvious trolls who think uwuing will get them out of trouble. We need to be stricter due to how shitposting has gotten across all boards. I'm tired of reading the "she's ugly" then that's the post.

No. 22085

>>22081
epic comeback

No. 22086

>>22081
it makes more sense for it to be in /snow/ rather than /ot/ but you're also admitting that you are basically a newfag.

No. 22087

>>22083
That poster could easily be banned for minimodding/metaposting though, it's not like this "couldn't be avoided", this is a thread to question modding, not cow threads.

No. 22088

>>22082
That's not me. It's not my fault someone ban-evades. I only posted here because I didn't understand the ban. Now I do and I agree that the tinfoil was too much and I'm just going to wait out the ban and probably never post in the belle thread anymore.

No. 22089

>>22088
It's the only tuesday redtext and your ban was filed tuesday. I get not all bans are redtext but a ban evade warning and a ban evade redtext, is clearly you.

No. 22090

>>22083
That entire thread was offset by one anon saying something, so it would make sense that only that idiot would be redtexted while any infighting under it simply be banned as opposed to redtexting. There's like hours of infighting and I dont want to squint through the bright red that mods put on.

>>22085
Your post has no value whatsoever, nice.

No. 22091

>>22088
>>22088
Okay it looks like the redtext doesn't match the ban, that's a mistake and you didn't ban evade. However the warning is valid because not only are you tinfoiling about whiteknights, you have a significant history dedicated to nitpicking in Belle threads. There are other anons ban evading so that's why you probably got lumped in with them in error.

No. 22092

>>22091
Thank you. I agree I was nitpicking earlier in the thread and the tinfoil was stupid. This was not helping the thread at all. I will be more careful from now on and I appreciate you checking up on the ban

No. 22093

>>22086
Nta but she’s saying it originally belonged in /snow/ in the sense that if we’re going to have a celebrity thread it should have always been there, not that it always was

No. 22094

Twitterfags are shitting up the egirl general thread. Can a seperate Olivia King thread be made so they can migrate over there please.

No. 22095

bruh why the fuck does the page keep skipping straight to the bottom on the sjw containment thread I cant read shit

No. 22096

Gore was just posted unspoilered and I saw it on front page and completely ruined my appetite ew I did report though

No. 22097

>>22096

Yeah came here to say the same thing.

No. 22098

>>22093
Snow is for snowflakes, celebrities aren't snowflakes in that sense.

No. 22099

>>22098
Yeah that’s true I guess, I think celebritiws can definitely be snowflakes and because it’s called celebricows people view it as talking about celebrities who are also cows but in reality it functions more as just general celebrity news. I still think it would probably work better in /snow/ because it’s more similar to the various /snow/ general threads than any of the other threads in /ot/.

No. 22100

>>22098
Idk I just see them all as cows.

No. 22101

File: 1620229575609.jpeg (34.48 KB, 828x159, 683A5DE6-2F38-4F7A-9069-F5B1CD…)

got this when trying to report a post, what does it mean

No. 22103

>>22045
I would love to see MM threads back but I wouldn't tolerate Annie any longer.
Are you sure it's gonna be milky tho? Now it's only that interview with his ex gf and a few more accusation articles from the victims with nothing new.
We should probably wait when the investigations drop some juicy details about his life.

No. 22104

>>22101
Means you're banned on that board. Try making a comment in that thread.

No. 22105

>>22101
>>22104
We should still be able to report stuff when banned tbh. I only report really serious shit like cp, gore, that retard who spams naked black women everywhere and the retard that responds with naked white women.

No. 22106

>>22105
I wouldn't even know what I would've been banned for, especially in that thread, but I'll check back on it later

No. 22107

File: 1620255454428.jpeg (285.64 KB, 733x1058, B91D0BC2-6123-46CD-BBC9-328EC9…)

>gets banned for 5 days because of my autistic spamming
>ban expired few hours ago
>one of the jannies still permabanned me

I literally did the crime jesus christ is it still possible to be unbanned?

No. 22109

>>22107
Clearly you shitpost a lot. Hell no.

No. 22110

>>22107
Still ban evading and baiting across threads meepmeep?

No. 22111

>>22105
No. Anons deserve no rights when banned.

No. 22112

Can I suggest a pro cat thread in /ot/? They just are the funniest creatures.

No. 22113

>>22112
I agree with this! If we have a doghate thread then why not I wouldn't mind if doghate got locked though

No. 22114

>>22112
You can make any thread you like as long as it's not in the catalog or 6 months old

No. 22115

>>22110
Can you finally answer my discord message then?

No. 22116

>>22112
It's off topic, make any retarded little thread you want. Usually they get locked if: redundant, not unique enough to have its own thread, or if it belongs in another board, or if it's just retarded spam

No. 22117

>>22113
>>22112
>>22116
I feel like ageneral pets thread is more appropriate

No. 22118

>>22117
I hate general threads, when you share a thread with people you hate it's going to lead to infighting.

No. 22120

>>22118
>thread full of people who hate each other
That's literally all the threads on this site though…

No. 22121

>>22111
So you don’t care about cp being spammed? You care more about punishing people for shitposting?

No. 22122

File: 1620287519939.jpeg (396.44 KB, 586x1001, E21EEC8D-D04E-49D4-B307-D2114D…)

>>21723
Admin you are even more worthless than the last one. Kys. Nobody here values you.

No. 22123

>>22122
Also wtf is that ban message? Is that supposed to be witty and amusing? You need to resign and go the fuck back to Twitter.

No. 22124

There is no hope for lolcow if we can't even agree on a cat thread smh

No. 22126

>>22125
Well do I make a cat thread or general pet thread? Whatever I do is not ok by someone. Fuck that shit. When simple posting becomes problematic like that, I'll just go talk about cats elsewhere. That's why I'm saying there's no hope for lolcow is it continues like this, posting needs to be a smooth experience.

No. 22128

>>22127
>>22125
>>22123
>>22122
Jesus, you deserve the ban. You're insufferable.

No. 22130

>>22126
The rules clearly state that you can make whatever thread you want as long as it's not already in the catalog or a 6 month dead thread, sure anons will complain about anything that isn't a redundant vent thread but it doesn't mean you'll get banned.

No. 22131

>>22122
Admins and mods need to stop shitting their pants and give us back a GC thread. This will keep happening because you give us NOWHERE TO TALK ABOUT THIS. Like how retarded are you really, admin? Do you think you can run a site that is a haven for TERFs and think they will not keep bringing up TERF shit on your site?

Either be the minge you are and close the FtM thread cause you can't handle any discussion about scrotes that is not "haha lol funny tranny" or give us a fucking place to speak to each other about these issues that are obviously very important to us.

This site is honestly run by retards and it is sad because it's one of the only places for women to go.

No. 22132

>>22126
lmao when was posting on LC ever a smooth experience?

No. 22133

>>22131
you make us all look bad kys

No. 22134

>>22131
It looks like you didn't see the recent ban you got for derailing the thread with studies over how much testersone black women have. The rest of your post history in the MtF thread is really just you venting about the men in your life. Those are discussions you should be having with your therapist. Notice how none of that is related to MtF milk.

No. 22135

>>22130
That’s obviously not true since you repeatedly lock threads that people use and enjoy, like the macaroons thread and the infight thread and many, many more. You deleted my comments saying this just now even though it’s true and always has been. People have to walk on eggshells around here even when they’re just playfully posting about retarded shit. What harm is a fucking macaroon thread, for Christ’s sake? Or an infight thread? “Oh it’s retarded shitpost 2.0” so what?
And why is any political discussion around here mocked and stamped out? What on earthh is wrong with having a thread about politics? “Oh it will make people infight” boo fucking hoo, are you that fragile you have to relentlessly police the communication here until it is a vacuous cloying shitfest of nitpicking girls vaginas and lusting after ugly old men? Just fucking give up, you suck. Stick to deleting the cp and stop sticking your oar in everytine someone wants a heated debate. Eventually nobody will post on here anymore.

No. 22136

>>22134
Nice strawmanning without addressing any of the issues I have raised you useless sack of shit handmaiden.

No. 22137

>>22136
Kek based.

No. 22138

>>22134
Anon: People are posting off-topic GC stuff in the MtF thread because you don't give them a place to talk about GC things.
Admin: LulZ ur post history tho, off topic posts! Get banned!

This is why people hate you.

No. 22139

>>22135
Agreed.

The entire "no infighting ever" rule is dumb and makes it so no valuable discussion can ever be had. A site where everyone always agrees with each other is boring as shit. Get the fuck over it and hide threads you don't like. Nobody is forced to look at a GC or politics thread. There are a shit ton of dumb threads about camwhores I hide cause they don't interest me.

You will never have the sanitized hugbox site you desire because you gave people an ANONYMOUS site to shit-talk. Make a forum and be a female Null if you desire to dictate people's opinions.

No. 22140

>>22139
Admin needs to fuck off and go be a Reddit moderator.

No. 22141

>>22135
I don't lock any of those threads, I'm actually the one who unlocked the infighting thread.
>>22138
As if half the threads on this site don't already devolve into GC discussion and men. You're not entitled to a GC thread because you lost those rights a year ago, cry about it all you want.
>>22135
The irony here is your history of ban evading and being a nitpicking sped. I feel sorry for you.

No. 22143

File: 1620299857823.jpeg (93.28 KB, 640x417, 5AD0BAAA-ED05-4609-88AE-A787DC…)

>>22141
No you didn’t, it’s still fucking locked. And I didn’t “nitpick” you literally ban anyone that doesn’t kiss belle delphines grubby ass. So I think she’s fucking ugly and a disgusting person who posts rape porn and MRA tier statistics about how 70% of women enjoy rape, so what? She deserves all the scorn she gets in her thread. The fact that ONE anon had a huge vendetta against it and spammed about it here should concern you, but it didn’t. You should of banned that anon.
I’m the one “nitpicking” but not shartna anons that have almost 70 threads about how fat and stupid she is?

No. 22144

>>22141
Admin you LITERALLY go into belles thread and delete nasty comments about her. What the fuck is wrong with you? Did she pay you off or something?(samefagging)

No. 22145

File: 1620301883174.png (36.27 KB, 1705x224, whypipo.PNG)

>>22141
You're just fucking bitter and thinking you're owning us by taking away the one thing we want and silence our discussion cause it gives you some weird powertrip over the "entitles white TERFs". You're not admin material, you're a bitter loser and you can't even code, you literally let a gay man handle the backend cause you are a useless piece of trash who just wants to cry about being oppressed all day. That's why you can't just give up the site to someone who cares, it's the only power you have.

You will never be a white woman.

No. 22149

can something be done about the one sperg/multiple spergs who keep shitting up the manifestation thread in /ot/? it’s very obvious they’re just being a dickhead for the sake of it and it’s getting tired

No. 22150

>>22145
>implying being a white woman is everyone's final goal
kek nonny, nobody gives a fuck about you, cave monkey. go play victim or something. Also, the fact that you're crying and taking your aggression out over a dramaboard just shows your retarded entitlement.

No. 22151

>>22150
Seriously. High testosterone alert, kek

No. 22152

File: 1620318364079.jpg (634.88 KB, 1080x1927, Screenshot_20210506-092540_Sam…)

Yo, farmhand. The spergs from the Belle threads are back.

No. 22153

>>22135
You feel like walking on eggshells because you can't just spergout unquestioned or unfiltered? Anon can dry what they want and I love the redtext hammers. Its putting a stop to autistic posters like you who previous farmhands just let go and just autosaged things they couldn't handle.

No. 22154

>>22152
She’s ugly, get over it.

No. 22155

>>22150
Nta but wtf is wrong with you? Admin clearly started the retarded race baiting to begin with. Clearly you can dish it out but you can’t take it back. “Cave monkey” but I thought we where all rich terfs?

No. 22156

>>22153
Are all of admins friends coming to defend her because we made the bitch cry again? Kek.

No. 22157

>>22155
Also nta, but what? No one was talking about race until >>22145. That screenshot is months old

No. 22158

>>22155
Personally I don't give a fuck what admin did or didn't do. You saying "You will never be a white woman" is kind of an insult to every single other race, as if that's the goal, so you were the one that started that shit HERE. don't double back now by playing victim AGAIN, cave monkey. (But this is exactly what I expected of you)

No. 22159

>>22154
Get banned again. Cope.

No. 22160

>>22157
Ok? Admin wants to bring race into it, why? As if white women never have to deal with DV or rape. And that other nonny said “cave monkey” >>22150

>>22158 I never said that you fucking retard, it was the nonny that posted the screenshot.

No. 22161

>>22159
Shes ugly and washed up and nobody likes her. Not even her own parents.

No. 22162

>>22161
>>22160
This is secondhand embarrassment to watch someone shitpost like this.

No. 22163

>>22162
Oh no what will I ever do about my tarnished reputation?

No. 22164

>>22131
The funniest part about GC and manhate demands are that you can see plenty of casual manhate or gender critical shit all over the place in chunks and it's allowed to stay if it isn't overly autistic. I haven't seen the "glory" of old GC threads, but I doubt you'd contribute actually good discussion on theory or literature over >>22122 freudian armchairshit like this. Keep that shit for your tumblr, your personal musings don't interest people.

No. 22165

>>22160
NTA, but why are you triggered about the words “cave monkey” but completely unbothered by the racist “You will never be a white woman” comment from the screenshot poster? Do you really think anyone with a brain will agree that it’s okay to insult every race of woman except white ones, lol?
Keep quiet for all of it, or none.

No. 22166

>>22164
Yeah you wish you could ever contribute to a discussion like that. Moron. Nothing wrong with pondering the depths of humanity. You’re just a fucking dunce who doesn’t like to think deeply about anything.

No. 22167

>>22166
>tips fedora

No. 22168

File: 1620320716383.jpeg (83.24 KB, 1624x224, D0487618-6FB2-44CA-8D43-EB96BB…)

>>22165
Admin literally said THIS. She’s the one with a hateboner for white women. That’s why I didn’t care when she said “you will never be a white woman”.

No. 22169

>>22167
You proved my point. Fuck off back to Reddit with your memespeak.

No. 22170

>>22168
So, because the admin said something, you think it's okay to evoke white supremacy (indirectly insulting ALL women who aren't white, not just her), then cry over “cave monkey”.
By the way, anyone can be a cave monkey. Look it up, it’s not a slur.

No. 22171

>>22170
“Stupid white bitches don’t deserve to discuss gender critical politics”
“You will never be a white woman”
“THATS WHITE SUPREMACY!!!!”

Seems like you’re the one who’s triggered. I’m just pointing out what a flaming hypocrite you are.

No. 22172

>>22170
I’m sorry that you’re triggered, because >>22145 reminded you that you’ll never be a white woman. Personally I don’t think that’s a bad thing but you seem pretty upset about it.

No. 22173

>>21723
>>22152
You are the reason meta dissolves into shit every few days. Report it and move the fuck on.

No. 22174

>>22171
>>22172
I didn't say any of those things first quoted, so I'm not a hypocrite (more projection from you crying over "cave monkey" like a toddler), but keep playing the victim and samefagging, cave monkey.
I hope the anon who originally called you that feels vindicated. Because of people like you, we'll probably never get GC threads back until we get a new admin.

No. 22175

>>22168
Lmao I didn't know about this how pathetic

No. 22176

>>22168
There's no name as to who posted that or a time, date. Anyone could've wrote it. We've had trolls and scrotes in our discord for years. This could even be off the lolcow discord. You want anons to take this as admin by face value alone? Lol this is obviously some bad larping

No. 22177

>>22174
Keep crying over “you will never be a white woman”
You love to accuse people of crying and playing the victim don’t you? Projection much.
Literally sperg about cave monkey all you like, nobody gives a fuck. Just don’t expect us to care when you’re crying about people “evoking white supremacy” for a throwaway comment. That’s all I was saying.
How does it feel to have someone put words in your mouth? You’re going off at me for a comment I didn’t even fucking make.
Sorry that you’ll never be a white woman, I guess. I don’t think that’s a bad thing personally but you clearly do.
“REEEE GET OVER IT I CALLED YOU A CAVE MONKEY!!! “
I never even cared in the first place.

No. 22178

>>22177
Cope.

No. 22179

File: 1620321364286.jpeg (52.18 KB, 680x580, 9389383.jpeg)

>>22177
cave monkey lol

No. 22180

>>22179
Literally where did I say that you couldn’t say cave monkey? I said stop being a fucking hypocrite.
You couldn’t make it any clearer that you’re seething with monkey brain rage.

No. 22181

>>22164
Exactly literally every other post in every thread is manhate/gc yet because this one Valerie Solanas from Wish, manifesto length spergout got a banned they’re being “silenced”. It’s a cow thread, being that autistic about literally any topic would get someone banned. Any time they aren’t just given special treatment they act as if they’re being persecuted.

>>22145
the fact you think Ian was gay shows how new you are and how little you know about the site

No. 22182

The way Lainey talk is banned from the Onion thread, can speculation about whether Sarah would have stayed with the Onions if real life didn't happen be banned? It's v annoying.

No. 22183

File: 1620321644362.jpg (111.45 KB, 432x645, MONKEY_CAVE_34_0105.jpg)

>>22177
kek I'm not reading any of this, I promise.

picrel it's (You)

No. 22184

>>22181
Ian “was” gay? Well hopefully that means he’s dead now.

No. 22185

File: 1620321653119.jpeg (371.25 KB, 1024x594, cavemonkey.jpeg)


No. 22186

>>22183
Nigger

No. 22187

>>22180
cave monkey

No. 22188

>>22183
That’s ok I know it’s difficult for niggers to read

No. 22189

>>22186
>>22188
seethe harder please, it's so funny

No. 22190

>>22182
Controversial take coming through: we don't need more onion threads, he's a dry cow at this point, the threads are now full of sperging, trolling and off topic autistic infighting.

No. 22191

File: 1620321844368.jpg (52.91 KB, 800x531, monkey-cave-thailand-190505723…)

>>22186
>>22188
>OOOO OOO EEE EEEE CAVE MONKEY CAVE MONKEY

No. 22192

>>22189
Kek you’re the one chimp raging all over the thread with your “offensive” memes. You bloody wish I was “seething” don’t you? Would that give you a little power trip over the ebul white waaahhmen?

No. 22193

>>22191
Are you the angry tranny GRRR ANGERY anon? You’re both painfully unfunny and schizophrenic

No. 22194

File: 1620321968222.gif (759.04 KB, 220x140, angery.gif)


No. 22195

>>22194
You will never be a white woman

No. 22196

File: 1620322097714.png (Spoiler Image, 72.22 KB, 250x293, hmmm.png)

>>22195
>Who could be behind this post?

No. 22197

File: 1620322168656.jpg (171.79 KB, 1600x1067, you.jpg)


No. 22198

>>22195
>>22193
>>22192
Go on, keep venting nonny. It's okay. You are heard and loved here. We support you.

No. 22199

File: 1620322381070.jpeg (241.26 KB, 800x1125, D8E92F2E-E01A-411C-B3D1-96CF76…)

>>22197
Awe monkeys are so cute aren’t they?

No. 22200

>>22198
Ily nonnette. Thank god not everyone here is a psycho Twitter nazi.

No. 22201

File: 1620322497506.png (176.9 KB, 680x329, 2bd.png)

Meanwhile, the cave monkey

No. 22202

File: 1620322574114.jpeg (1.81 MB, 2406x2994, 9A4BED37-9DC2-4EC5-9257-B23EB8…)

>>22201
Chill out and eat sum leaf

No. 22203

File: 1620322709821.png (387.14 KB, 1024x576, h8icdo8237s41.png)

>>22199
>>22202
NTA but those are gorillas, also acknowledged here in case you prefer gorilla nouns: >>22179
However, we are inclusive of all screeching cave apes and monkeys here on Lolcow. Keep raising your voice ♥

No. 22204

>>22174
Nonny you’re the one screeching and flinging faeces at everyone over a nonny that got banned hours ago. Chill out and eat a banana. or some watermelon

No. 22205

File: 1620322905234.jpeg (313.33 KB, 2880x1500, cjvjvotu2j551.jpeg)

>>22201
It'd actually be funny if they tried to reverse uno with gorillas, because gorillas are actually chill, in stark contrast to the constantly racebaiting/samefagging cave monkey.

No. 22206

File: 1620323048096.jpeg (120.55 KB, 692x813, 2CACEAC2-DC96-47E4-965C-7B2D5C…)

>>22205
I think all monkeys are cute tbh.

No. 22207

>>22205
Holy shit this picture is amazing nonny. Thanks for sharing.

No. 22208

>>22190
I didn't ask for a new thread I asked for an irrelevant topic to be banned. There's already a thread for his orbiters.

No. 22209

File: 1620323436623.jpeg (187.73 KB, 1280x800, o1dn0s3Mlf1u1j57co1_1280.jpeg)

>>22206
>I think all monkeys are cute tbh.
>can't even bring themselves to save a picture of their own kind, a cave monkey
>instead posts picture of based great ape
You will never be a gorilla

No. 22210

File: 1620323613909.jpeg (138.08 KB, 800x664, E57620E8-5CE6-4327-97C1-ACCB1E…)

>>22209
Here, I made you into a white woman

No. 22211

>>22145
honestly i agree. site wasn’t great in 2018 when i started using it but this site loves to censor anyone they dont agree with, the farmhands and admin are worse than cows and other users, literally get off on picking on certain users because you have posted some takes they disagree with. if farmhands had a social media presence, they would literally be cows. thin skinned cunts who try to act like they’re “so unbothered” but get a power trip REEing at you when you read the ban message. they take things personally and literally nitpick posts and ban based off of their hurt feeling nitpicks. i look at threads from years ago and barely see redtext. no wonder the site is dying, even OT sucks now, cant post jack shit lest it hurts a sensitive pussy farmhand. they make it clear they fucking hate you if you aren’t also a condescending, man-hating, white-hating liberal on this site. it’s pathetic how little tolerance they truly have for users with different opinions then them. inb4 b& for this but you know its true.

No. 22213

>>22208
I just realised you probably meant to not make a new thread when it's full kek. I prefer when the thread dies and only gets resurrected if something happens. Usually makes him sperg if lolcow doesn't have a thread.

No. 22214

File: 1620323744562.jpeg (30.79 KB, 530x530, c0c33.jpeg)

>>22210
An albino gorilla, thankfully, is still a gorilla and not the incel cave monkey.
Please never catfish again

No. 22215

>>22209
Are those Macaques? So cute. Just like the gorillas.
I wish I was monke

No. 22216

>>22214
Please, what are you trying to accomplish? Nobody is offended by you constantly spamming cute monkeys.
If you had half a brain you’d be calling us Neanderthals, because they are actual cave monkeys, but you don’t even know what they are.
Isn’t it funny how white peoples have to help you think of insults for them? Bc you’re that fucking stupid.

No. 22218

>>22154
how does the left NOT look better than the right on that post?? she looks fine, its the filters that actually make her look ugly af.

No. 22219

>>22217
Is this your debate tactic? To bore people until they can’t take any more? Because it’s working.

No. 22220

>>22131
based. i fucking miss GC, so much. personally helped me because i lost a few close HS friends to TRA rhetoric and becoming “they/them”s

No. 22221

>>22213
Kek sorry for not making myself clear.
>Usually makes him sperg if lolcow doesn't have a thread.
More reason to not make one right away after this one dies, he's not doing anything milky these days anyway, only crying about his irrelevancy.

No. 22222

File: 1620324223492.jpeg (735.76 KB, 1500x1104, cave monkey.jpeg)

>>22216
tl;dr. Chill out, really, stop being triggered at some cute monkey pictures. Again, it's not a slur.

No. 22223

>>22218
She’s ugly AF. We are allowed to think so. How many people sperg about anya Taylor joy, emrata, dua lipa? A lot of people think your waifu looks like a sewer rat.

No. 22224

>>22222
KEK what do we care if it’s a slur or not? Nobody cares what niggers think.

No. 22225

File: 1620324546741.jpeg (14.67 KB, 319x280, 5de5d2bcbf38bf6b605b7bff2c7181…)

>>22224
Calm down, eat a banana. Take a nap in your cave, too much sunlight is bad for you.

No. 22226

File: 1620324673275.jpeg (186.47 KB, 800x600, FC60118F-DBE8-40C2-A7C8-CC3579…)


No. 22227

File: 1620324909596.jpeg (63.79 KB, 600x750, last-wild-monkeys-in-europe.jp…)

>>22226
Great, glad we're all on the same page.
That's an Indigenous Brazillian monkey, by the way. I think this one is from Europe.

No. 22228


No. 22229

File: 1620325057658.jpeg (142.92 KB, 600x900, FB62ED07-2930-48C4-9FFF-1BB6AA…)

>>22227
Kek you wish you could be this beautiful. You probably wouldn’t be flinging your shit if you where. Funny how it’s always the ugly black chicks that screech at white women.

No. 22230

Did the zookeeper have an identity crisis and turn into a racist what's going on

No. 22231

>>22218
but muh smile lines!

No. 22232

File: 1620325165467.png (359.05 KB, 400x386, fat_guy_3.png)

>>22216
>Please, what are you trying to accomplish? Nobody is offended by you constantly spamming cute monkeys. If you had half a brain you’d be calling us Neanderthals, because they are actual cave monkeys, but you don’t even know what they are. Isn’t it funny how white peoples have to help you think of insults for them? Bc you’re that fucking stupid.

No. 22233

File: 1620325192079.jpeg (88.51 KB, 1000x669, 2745061459_6d4c9fd140_b.jpeg)

>>22229
Sorry I can't understand monke when you get so angry. Please be calm and phrase your words coherently.
Gorillas never get this way, very strange…

No. 22234

>>22232
That man isn’t even white kek

No. 22235

>>22230
Lmao right? What the fuck happened. That anon's bait is horrible

No. 22236

File: 1620325267923.jpg (366.22 KB, 1600x1289, animal-monkey-twiddle-ass-angr…)

>>22230
No it's just a triggered cave monkey chimping out over there

No. 22237

>>22233
Yep, it’s always the fat ugly black women with the dry, ashy grey skin that like to shit on white women. I’ve never seen a good looking black women seethe about le cracker bitches, because they know they’re good enough to bag a man of any race. Unlike ugly niggers like you, who aren’t wanted by anyone.

No. 22238

File: 1620325459184.jpeg (120.78 KB, 626x900, 48fd27f56cbc6414757d0408d1a889…)

>>22237
>Yep, it’s always the fat ugly black women with the dry, ashy grey skin that like to shit on white women. I’ve never seen a good looking black women seethe about le cracker bitches, because they know they’re good enough to bag a man of any race. Unlike ugly niggers like you, who aren’t wanted by anyone.

No. 22239

>>22238
You know it’s true.

No. 22240

>>22237
Sorry but this is so untrue. It’s literally always the ugly ones who try to pander to the vanilla gorillas

No. 22241

File: 1620325701570.png (353.56 KB, 1200x630, unnamed (1).png)

>>22239
Feeling better now? I'm not sure what made monke so upset, but please don't fling any more of your shit or rip off anyone's face.
We want peace. You too can evolve one day, don't worry.

No. 22242

>>22240
That’s true but I don’t know why you’re saying this, since I didn’t mention anything about pandering. I’m saying good looking black women don’t humiliate themselves like this. They know they’re hot not because of their race, but because of who they are as a person.
Ugly niggers like to bring down white women because it makes them feel prettier.

No. 22243

>>22241
Kek you are the one spamming 100s of pictures. Go have a bath, nourish that ashy dry skin.

No. 22244

File: 1620325979593.jpeg (153.41 KB, 697x1023, 3922778180_b632f5476f_b.jpeg)

>>22230
For some reason, it seems like monkey pictures make this particular anon really angry and black out into racist spergouts. I was posting them out of boredom at first, but it's actually really funny now. They're putting so much emotion into these n-word rants no one's going to read or ever care about.
This is how I imagine he/she looks in his/her room right now.

No. 22245

>>22243
>thinking water moisturizes and nourishes ashy skin
Lol

No. 22246

>>22242
so is that why you're doing this? it makes you feel prettier?

No. 22247

File: 1620326200190.jpeg (20.66 KB, 271x200, _blogger_761_1659_1600_Probosc…)

>>22243
More than one person's been posting, though. Do monkeys even know what baths are? I Googled, and it seems like at least the Japanese ones do, not sure about cave ones. They're pretty cool.

>>22245
Cave monkey anon just exposed that she doesn't bathe lol

No. 22248

>>22245
Nobody puts just-water in their baths kek.

No. 22249

>>22248
Did you have to ask a human about that? Kek

No. 22250

Not trying to sound too stupid but wtf is going on here
Why monkeys?
Why don't you people bath?!

I'm so confused I forgot why I came here

No. 22251

Wtf is going on in here? What kind of retarded David Attenborough wildlife, monkey, ape race-bait sperging is this? Sort yourselves out, bunch of absolute spergs. This is pathetic and it's not even funny, it's dumb.

No. 22254

>>22250
One anon called another a cave monkey after they racebaited about being white. A third anon jumped in to take offense at the term "cave monkey", then people started posting monkey pictures, to which they responded with mask-off racism, and now here we are.

No. 22255

I love monkeys. Sorry for saying nigger <3

No. 22256

>>22254
Thanks for the update

Honestly people are really unhinged for a Thursday.
Is it fullmoon or something?

No. 22257

>>22255
Just stop it.
It's not funny.
Go out and eat some gras.
If you want to act like a cow commit to it.

No. 22258

File: 1620327946109.jpg (210.82 KB, 2431x1823, 142941200-589ca98b3df78c475817…)

>>22257
Fuck you, bourgeois pig

No. 22259

>>22251
It's the Belle Delphine vendetta sergs. They already outted themselves as the posters and bragged about IP hopping to evade.

No. 22260

>make post simply to piss off admin cause she is a worthless shit janny
>come back several hours later to check replies
>monkehs everywhere

Chill out guys, I just wanted to remind admin that her vendetta against the perceived superior white rich girls on this website (this is her paranoia) is hopeless and she will never be a white woman.

No. 22261

>>22260
You did end up exposing that we have a /pol/tard problem here, though. Foaming at the mouth and writing schizo racist essays over monkey pics.

No. 22262

There has been a major gendersperg/radfem/whateverism derail in the MtF thread for like half a day now, can these ovarit escapees get a timeout to cool down or something? I've only seen one original sperg redtexted, but they've been at it pretty consistently. Inb4
>report and move on
I did report pretty much all of them, they're still posting walls of texts no one cares about
>hide the thread
No
>tranny
No, I just hate unintegrated spergs that don't even pretend to be talking about troons or social media posts anymore, but straight up blog their thoughts on men just to get (you)s for "going off".

No. 22265

File: 1620337049105.jpeg (169.9 KB, 1354x265, 40A3EFE9-278A-4E4F-AD3F-4AA40A…)

not like I made the post of the year of anything, but it bugs me that giving the slightest context to the point you’re trying to make is considered blogging. I swear they’re gonna start banning for saying ‘I’ soon.

No. 22266

Oh look it's the faggots who were sperging about which race has saggier boobs in celebricows the other day
Kill yourselves

No. 22269

File: 1620337459014.png (237.35 KB, 1137x1125, 1618264098769.png)

>>22266
>Oh look it's the faggots who were sperging about which race has saggier boobs in celebricows the other day
>Kill yourselves

No. 22270

CP in /snow.

No. 22271

>>22266
>the other day
The creepy white incel/femcel who’s obsessed with black women is still shitting up the celebricows thread on and off, calling random people “fat ugly jealous black women”. Probably the Belle Delphine sperg too. You can tell by the soyjak that there's some scrotal business going on here, probably a troon.

No. 22272

>>22223
i dont like her either but its a personality thing. people have the right to say shed ugly if they think she is but i don’t believe you actually think that. like if u passed her on the street and she wasn’t a stupid ethot, i doubt you would be like OMG OMG GAG EWWW SO UGLY. have you gone outside lately nonny? belles editing and personality and poor life choices are the true ugly parts of her.

No. 22273

>>22271
it's weird how insistent certain people are that every /pol/ sperg is 1) male and 2) all the same person. There has pretty consistently been a sizeable amount of users like that here since day one.

No. 22274

>>22272
NTA and I don't want to sperg but her mouth triggers me. When she smiles she has that autistic face, similar to LJ. I can't really describe the vibe.

No. 22275

>>22271
>probably a troon

Normally I'd disagree but somehow the combination of male aggression with mental instability makes me believe it too.

No. 22276

>>22273
Don’t act like they fit in, I’ve been here for years and am just now seeing this particular rash of them. They all talk the same way, and they’re always in the same threads because they don’t know how to navigate this site correctly. They just follow the links given to them by other Discord trannies.
Also, soyjak posting is something scrotes consistently do when they come here, I’m surprised if you haven’t seen it. The latter started with the Vtuber pedos and spergs immigrating here and getting angry that their thread was locked for having no milk

No. 22277

>>22262
Have you considered suicide? I think it could benefit you.

No. 22278

>>22273
They just try to connect the dots in order to feel smart. Like how they where all insisting the zookeeper was posting cp, or the diverspergs where posting cp, or the diverspergs where trannies who where posting cp, or the pizza gate sperges where posting cp and also trannies. now all the belle sperges are the same as the monkey spergers, and I’m guessing, are either scrotes, trannies or cp posters.

No. 22279

>>22276
Maybe with the person posting soyjack but to every instance of racebait people are always immediately like “hi scrote” now and I just think it’s really weird, as if /pol/sperg “edgy” egirl is not like a very common genre of girl online. I don’t even agree that it’s particularly new for lolcow like to my memory even back in 2014-2016 racebait used to pretty much exclusively mean “said something negative about white people” and even in the thread years ago when we were voting on the board-tan one of the major reasons people wanted that one was “she’s white and blonde that’ll make the sjws seethe!” there has always been these kind of users.

No. 22280

>>22276
>soyjak posting
yeah I've noticed this, I wonder if they know it makes them stand out a mile away and don't care or if they're genuinely too autistic to realize

No. 22281

>>22280
Lots of women soyack post. People like you derail discussions with your baseless tinfoil takes. It’s annoying.

No. 22282

>>22281
It's not tinfoil, maybe they do on 4chan where it's part of the board culture but not here. And if they did they'd also be raging newfags who can't integrate

No. 22283

>>22281
It's not the meme itself but the way it's posted. If you've been around when the vtuber sperg sperged out and started spamming every board and greentexting random posts you'd notice it's obviously the same person. So far I haven't seen a single soyjak here that was used in a normal post.

No. 22286

>>22281
Nah I think it's real too. It's not very exciting nor is it a matter of cleverness to notice. It's very reminiscent of banned kiwi farmers coming here and being as unable to integrate in lolcow as they are in real life.

It shouldn't derail a thread but. If it's not reportable you just have to ignore it.

No. 22287

>>22286
i think the idea that just anyone from kf comes here after being banned over there is retarded. bans are handed out like nothing here but all you do over there is collect little top hats and trash cans until the userbase ignores you or you shoot up a school like couch cuck and usually its only the handful that frequent beauty parlor that make a splash between here and there. you can even look now, kelly is about to have her legs chopped off and people are going to her thread only because its featured to comment that damn i dont follow girlcow shit but man. but its not like shes even talked about here, its just girls 18-32 who are mainly connected thu anime or youtube or instagram. its so confined and basic. at least kiwifarms is diverse.

No. 22288

>>22287
>i think the idea that just anyone from kf comes here after being banned over there is retarded. bans are handed out like nothing here
nta but this is an anonymous board not really tied to accounts, its easy to act retarded like wojack posting and get banned as opposed to it being tied to your persona. It's not rocket science.

No. 22289

>>22287

lol k guess i imagined it all
>>>/pt/784834
>>>/snow/1173123
Actually just most of >>>/snow/998558

When I said it reminded me of kiwi posters, I simply thought that their scroteness is what was familiar, but now I've read your post, I'm starting to wonder if we have been visited by some "diversity" this week.

No. 22290

>>22277
Kek sorry someone doesn't support your thread personality attempt at being "the essay-anon", replying to 3-4 people at once with full screen sized discount freudian shit.
>it's the meeeen, they won't let us talk about them
and other nice conspiracy theories, you cross-site tourists can't imagine there are women that don't want shit teenage level analyses to take over the thread. Screaming that you're being banned for being gendercritical every time you get called out for not being interesting or funny with your derailing just shows you're a sperg with zero self-reflexion. Is radfem-entitlement a term yet? No hate to actual, politically active oldschool radfems, only the terminally online kind that thinks it can't be blogging if they avoid using "I"

No. 22291

>>22170
>evoke white supremacy
No horse in this race just experiencing the heartiest of keks "anon".

No. 22292

>>22291
>”No horse in this race”
>came back 13 hours later
Lol the other anons were right
>eek eek ook ook

No. 22293

>>22292
I don't know if anyone's ever informed you but you're not talking a person named "anonymous" who suspiciously never sleeps

No. 22296

>>22262
Not all bans are red texted you know.

No. 22297

File: 1620388044649.jpg (20.16 KB, 320x318, 200295800481_7286.jpg)

>Everyone I don't like is a scrote

All day, every day. Women can have different opinions from you. Women can be racist. Women can be spergs. What does it change if you go around calling people scrotes instead of just reporting them for being racist or whatever bothers you?

No. 22298

>>22291
>>22293
It’s actually funny because if it had been “evoke misogyny” in response to some scrote making a weird comment about men being superior and insisting it’s because the admin was mean about scrotes in a private server, you probably would’ve agreed, but yeah, fuck any women that don’t either fit a specific box or hate themselves enough to let those that do trod on them, kek. Mucho feminismo.
Also, not being racist doesn’t make someone a newfag, shockingly enough.

No. 22299

>>22297
If they're gonna post like scrotes lost on their way to kf/4chan, people will call them scrotes. Simple as

No. 22300

>>22299
100% if a woman gets called a scrote and gets offended, good. Get your shit together and sort it out.

No. 22301

>>22299
I agree with this however simply disagreeing with anons' dissertations on why men are subhuman isn't posting like a scrote. Neither is saying those posts don't belong in the mtf thread

No. 22302

>>22299
>If they're gonna post like scrotes lost on their way to kf/4chan
But that’s what people are saying, they aren’t posting like scrotes from kf, they’re posting like farmers. Because there have always been a significant amount of racebaiters here. It’s just odd how desperate people are to always attribute every problem to scrotes, I don’t get what world you live in where it’s like unfathomable to you that plenty of women are racist/spergs especially the kind who post on imageboards

No. 22303

>>22298
Ofc they would. They go on and on about how important lolcow, a gossip website, is as a “haven for women” to “talk about their experiences” or whatever to try and justify being allowed to be a relentless gc sperg but I and a lot of women would never really be able to “talk about our experiences” bc it would just get banned for racebait (which is fine, I’m not saying it should be allowed), but I just hate the way they try and portray it like that. It has nothing to do with “giving women a place to talk about their experiences” and if it did, it only applies to a small amount of women.

No. 22304

>>22299
Being racist is not a scrote-exclusive thing and neither is being right-wing/conservative. There is even a fucking thread on tradthots on this website that shows that women can hold those same kinds of views.

Every time someone on this site goes even slightly against any kind of libshit view the "OMG YOU MUST BE A SCROTE! WOMEN WOULD NEVER THING THIS!" tards come out.

Just fucking deal with the fact that some women have different views than you.

No. 22305

>>22304
No one here is obligated to believe you’re a woman when you act like an abrasive scrote. You won’t die because someone called you a man. If you’re this bothered about it, why not just make your own site for totally 100% real women who are tradthots and conservatives? Or stay on /r9k/, /pol/ and KF with the moids you pander to.

No. 22306

>>22303
There is a big difference between these examples because while trannies are not welcome on the site, non-white women are, so of course no one would bat an eye at "gc sperging" directed at outsiders vs. racebait which targets users on this site. And if said users choose to confront you over it, that's on you.

No. 22307

>>22306
I’m not talking about the gc sperging itself. I’m talking about the way that whenever they get a ban for it or whatever it gets framed as “women not being allowed to share their experiences” but that is clearly not what they actually care about, they just want to be able to post their constant sperging. You could frame getting a ban for racebait as “not being allowed to share my female experience” too but they wouldn’t care about that and you wouldn’t get any special treatment so why should they.

No. 22308

So should we report anon who complain "whiteknight" in posts just because someone isn't vendetta posting?

No. 22310

>>22307
Pretty much. Some of the same anons who go on about not censoring women’s voices re: trannies love to attack women who aren’t exactly like themselves (as we’ve seen here), and then pretend to be innocent. They throw rocks, and then hide their hands.
Not all are like this, but there are definitely users here who claim to be “GC” or “radfem”, but they’re truly neither and don’t actually care about women as a group. Hell, a few of them probably aren’t even that bothered about troons in women’s spaces. They’re just unhinged weirdos that are bitter about not having the male privilege to harass and abuse other women as much as they’d like for not being white or whatever, lmao.

No. 22311

>>22305
>acting like a scrote
It's not acting like a scrote tho. There are millions of women on this earth who hold conservative views. Will it kill YOU to not call everyone you disagree with a scrote, which contributes absolutely nothing to the conversation and is completely pointless spam?

>stay on /r9k/, /pol/ and KF

No. Die mad and triggered, amerimutt. It is such a fucking retarded american worldview that divides people into "left" or "right" and everyone "on the other side" is bad and should be silenced. In other parts of the world we aren't scared to share a place with people who don't vote the same as we do.

No. 22312

File: 1620413732675.jpeg (10.96 KB, 680x253, 4c9.jpeg)

>>22311
Cry harder. No one cares if it triggers you to be called a scrote when you clearly function like one. Also I’m not American, but you probably are, with the way you’re being entitled and demanding strangers to accommodate you for no reason like a snowflake.
Looking forward to your next male-tier tantrum about this the next time everyone with two brain cells tells you to fuck off after you derail a thread with “muh politics!!”, which is a banned topic in the first place.

No. 22313

>>22312
Based

No. 22314

>>22312
Fuck off, scrote.

No. 22315

Ok so my theory is that if they're actually not male, "you will never be a white woman" anon is one of those edgy tumblr users who exist in a weird overlap between terf tumblr and edgelord fashwave tumblr

No. 22318

File: 1620424308628.jpeg (172.34 KB, 912x718, 1620019417993.jpeg)


No. 22319

File: 1620424335054.jpeg (303.98 KB, 1242x1141, 1620394600213.jpeg)

POSTING THIS TO HIDE THE CP. DONT SCROLL UP.

No. 22320

File: 1620424364481.jpg (56.96 KB, 710x533, 1620047337925.jpg)

POSTING THIS TO HIDE THE CP. DONT SCROLL Upppp

No. 22321

File: 1620424382601.jpg (69.17 KB, 896x1172, 179642119_283233223433168_6494…)

POSTING THIS TO HIDE THE CP. DONT SCROLL UPPPPP

No. 22325

File: 1620424645590.jpg (517.32 KB, 750x933, 1619311166378.jpg)

THIS IS TO HIDE CP FURTHER UP THREAD. DONT FUCKING CHECK IT. LEAVE META.

No. 22326

>>22321
I appreciate this anon. I hoped it was gone by now

No. 22327

File: 1620424699057.jpeg (93.47 KB, 1187x1280, 1619206414632.jpeg)

POSTING THIS TO HIDE THE CP FURTHER UP THREAD. DONT CHECK.

No. 22330

I hope admin reports you and you rot in jail.

No. 22342

Posted a bunch of threads, cp is off of the meta first page now.

No. 22343

>>22342
Thanks a lot.
I hope admin files a police report about cp posters so they don't get away with it.

No. 22344

>>22318
>>22319
>>22320
>>22321
>>22325
I appreciate this so much.

The poster is so mad at being called a scrote, so insistent about arguing the point, it has to be a troon. The CP fits that theory too.

No. 22345

>>22344
>bringing up terf tumblr.

found the troon. also learn that there are women who are not danger hairs who are twitter pilled and uwu light and positivity

also you spergs were asked to not spam when cp is posted. its gross and i hope those fuckers burn in the deepest level of whatever hell their belief set includes but its retarded. just close your browser and do something to make you smile.

No. 22346

>>22344
not you bb but >>22315 that dummy

No. 22347

>>22345
It does nothing but clog threads with "IM DOING US AFAVOR BY HIDING CP" when its an excuse to shitpost and probably the poster IP hopping to avoid being caught

No. 22348

>>22345
>Wahhh don't hide the CP thread, let everyone who visits meta without knowing there's cp see the cp, kek it's nbd. everyone should see it and then log off for the day

It's one thing if it's somewhere else like on /g/ and everyone is saying "there's cp on this other board" but it was an entire thread here as well as a pic in THIS thread. The correct move, if it's up for 2 hours, and to be a nice fucking decent human being is to make sure nobody sees it. Admin asked us to report, and not to just repeatedly spam "cp on xyz". That's fair, but not when users come here for a completely different reason and the first thing they see is child porn.

I'd literally rather you just commit suicide instead of suggesting it's okay to leave actual CP up for 2 hours. You're assuming everyone magically somehow knows that it's here.

No. 22349

>>22347
"clog thread" just go ahead and say you like cp, anon. I was the person spamming. And I don't care if you find it annoying. Plenty of other anons were grateful and don't have to see child porn and I'm okay with that.

No. 22350

>>22345
Who cares if someone spams to get cp out of the way? If it got deleted faster then no one would have to spam

No. 22351

Is there a reason that posts in the Kelly and compurrs thread have been deleted that I missed? Am I dumm?

No. 22353

>>22298
Weird assertions to make about an anonymous stranger kek. I'm sorry I laughed at (your?) buzzwords anon. I'll remember to take lolcow shitposts more seriously next time, and be sure to acknowledge the reality we're a board of feminist icons who think the same.

No. 22354

>>22353
nta but oh my god shut the fuck up. Nobody gives a shit about your "clever" and "witty" response and dragging out a day old shitfest.

No. 22355

When will there be a new townhall

No. 22356

If an anon calls you a scrote, why is it so hard for scroteanons to just let it go? Don't infight over such stupid shit. What do you have to prove on an anonymous board? It's scrote behaviour tbh.

No. 22357

File: 1620449621534.png (251.81 KB, 1456x2221, severe autism.png)

>>22356
it literally makes them suicidal lmao

No. 22358

>>22357
Isn't this also the anon that made the "Things that would get you called a scrote" thread and proceeded to post a pic of their hand and room to prove they aren't a scrote? Or am I mixing them up with some other anon that got emotional over being called a scrote

No. 22359

How do I do a thread request on /w/? There's a weeb game dev who is a lolcow but I don't know if I have the time to make a thread about him

No. 22360

>>22357
Kek, even if that turns out to be trolling, it's good value

>>22345
It's pretty normal for people to want to avoid seeing these images at all costs. I really didn't want to see it twice in one week.

No. 22361

File: 1620457741513.png (268.33 KB, 468x468, 2CBA8844-6D56-4F3B-A922-2BCB4E…)

what in the blue fuck happened to this thread

is there even an admin anymore?

No. 22362

>>22361
Can of worms opened when /ot/ was locked and now can't be closed again. That's when everyone flocked to /meta/ to sperg, and the sperging still hasn't stopped. Making a fresh complaints thread and putting "actual" in the title did nothing to stop it.
Admin's still here responding to "actual" complaints. Like, I got my cat thread and I'm happy.

No. 22363

>>22315
Using Tumblr is for libshits, are you retarded? Tumblr is literal pronoun-in-bio-mentally-ill-sex-positive hell on earth.

Only a literally retard who assumes everyone on this website can be grouped into some kind of "tumblr user" would not understand that the post was made to make fun of Admin for her burning hatred of white women, whom she perceives as better, richer and more priviledged to herself.

No. 22364

>>22363

You're confusing Tumblr with Twitter pal

No. 22365

File: 1620463934543.jpeg (47.4 KB, 750x419, 9A61DD98-F724-4479-8DDB-DE584D…)

>>22363
go to bed, anon

No. 22366

>>22363
Or she just perceives them as massive cunts and you just proved her point.

No. 22367

>>22364
corporate asked me to find the difference. i cant

No. 22368

>>22363
From what I hear, Tumblr hasn't been the same since they banned porn and all the radlibs packed up and left to terrorize Twitter. You're a couple years out of touch, anon.

No. 22369

>>22351
She self posted a lot. It could be those.

>>22345
Dumbass. Do you think LC has a finite number of posts. Dumbest take in this whole thread and that says a lot.

No. 22371

>>22362
/meta/ was filled with spergs way before that too lol. can't think of a single time it wasn't.

No. 22372

>>22357
That's definitely a tranny. I've been called a scoere a lot for my dumb opinions. Any anon that's actually a real woman will likely not care, considering they know what's in their pants and don't take it personally. Unless they have a dingaling then they start crying like this kek

No. 22373

>>22372
*scrote, fuck you autocorrect. All you fucking do is change scrote to score no matter how many fucking times I use the word….

No. 22374

>>22372
I don't find being called a scrote offensive it's more the idea that all women think the same way/they assume every single woman is as dumb as they are and anyone who isn't must be a man that's annoying

No. 22375

>>22372
Totally, I've been called a scrote when someone misunderstood a comment of mine. I just explained and moved on.
Troons can't move on since they're male and can't handle it when people point out that they don't pass.

No. 22376

>>22374
Yeah, I understand that concept. but getting suicidal over it? And sperging about it on an anonymous imageboard when nobody asked? Weird. I can understand making note of it in /meta/ and having a meaningful discussion about it but those screenshots just don't show that.

No. 22377

>>22376
oh sorry I didn't see what you were referring to, yes anyone getting suicidal over it is unhinged lmao. I thought you were just talking about the people who had brought it up in /meta/

No. 22378

>>22345
What the fuck? I'd take 80000 spam posts over CP any day.
No wonder people were calling you a scrote, you're out of your fucking mind.

No. 22381

>>22345
you are a creep

No. 22382

>>22378
Not the first person to say “god it’s no big deal! Stop posting annoying spam and log out!” In reference to literal CSA images. Imagine being more upset about memes and pics of botched zac efron than fucking CP, god. Sorry but it’s a complete fucking day ruiner, and Most people can’t just log out knowing that horrible shit is still lurking on the board.
“Don’t say it’s a day ruiner, you’re giving the cp scrotes what they want!”
Well, it’s a day ruiner. Can’t do anything about that.
I didn’t even see it this time.

No. 22384

>>22381
Found the SJW.

No. 22388

>>22345
>>22363
Damn I didn't expect my half assed tinfoil to trigger people like this lol. I bring up terf tumblr because i post there
>tumblr is only for libshit dangerhairs blah blah blah
You. Have. To. Go. Back.

No. 22389

Is it possible to request a thread on /w/?

No. 22390

>>22389
I'm pretty sure the Thread Request thread in /pt/ is for all boards.

No. 22391

>>22390
Thanks, anon!

No. 22392

>>22307
>You could frame getting a ban for racebait as “not being allowed to share my female experience” too but they wouldn’t care about that
I see someone wasn't around last year when the pinkpill threads got locked.

No. 22393

>>22392
How is that related to what I'm saying? I'm saying that if I was to post about the experience of being a black woman and write these manifestoesque spergs in every thread talking about the horrible treatment you get from white women and the way white women are socialised etc etc, I'd be banned for racebait (again, not saying this should or shouldn't be banned), even though that is my "female experience". As much so as the way men treat you. However, whenever some gc sperg gets a completely valid ban for derailing with some novel length sperg in a cow thread we have to endure days of spamming /meta/ about how they "won't let women express their experiences!" and there's some huge conspiracy about the tranny mods trying to silence women and lolcow needs to be a safehaven blah blah blah but it's obvious that's not what they care about and they just want a place to relentlessly sperg bc only one female experience is even really allowed on lc. Many women already can't post about your experience and are "silenced". Why should only theirs be exempt from the rules?

No. 22394

>>22393
Damn anon are you camping here?
It's related because the opposite of what you claim happened in that closed thread fiasco lmao.

No. 22395

>>22394
The pp thread being banned for racebait isn’t relevant to what I’m talking about outside of it just also being related to racebait. What I’m saying is that is disingenuous that one group being currently completely exempt from the rules and getting special treatment because their “female experience” must be protected above all else is framed as some important act of “protecting women’s voices” or whatever even though many others are being “silenced”. No amount of derailing every thread with racebait the way gc anons do would be accepted. No sperging in a /cow/ thread about race (even a semi relevant one like tradthots or whatever) would be allowed the way it is with the mtf thread. People would understand why you got banned and wouldn’t be running to /meta/ making up conspiracies about the white supremacist jannies and their plan to silence non white women because it would obviously be stupid so why are we expected to coddle them and accept it from them?

No. 22396

>>22395
I literally have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, but you do you.

No. 22400

>>22396
I think they're taking the tranny janny conspiracy anons a little too seriously. 4chan has its own conspiracy too, it's not exclusive to LC, and for the majority of anons it's a joke. I'm not sure where the race blog is relative, I think they just wanted to inform us they are infact not white?

No. 22401

so what if i can suck a dick and not think i was raped? lolcow wants a female friendly space but i can have sex with a man and almost enjoy it. you ladies spend too much time policing each other on what to think that you forget that freeze peach is allowing others to think differently.

No. 22403

Ladies remember to ignore low effort bait.

No. 22404

>>22393
You are talking absolute shit tbh

No. 22405

>>22393
Go to lipstick alley kek



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]