File: 1576672803119.jpeg (233.73 KB, 1124x716, 1575489897852.jpeg)
No. 510648
File: 1576673625344.png (187.59 KB, 400x387, 23.png)
Thank the flying spaghetti monster that were finally separated
No. 510650
File: 1576674910326.gif (8.85 MB, 480x480, giphy.gif)
oh my God, finally, we can breathe and speak without the male-identified bootlickers having a brain aneurysm!!! love you guys
No. 510651
File: 1576675455454.png (637.81 KB, 2048x911, Screenshot_20191219-002308.png)
>>510650Long live pink pill! Pickmes get out!
No. 510652
File: 1576675822572.jpg (612.29 KB, 1416x1872, 1553816682340.jpg)
In celebration of pink pill I'm posting my favorite receipts. Feel free to add more as I need to expand my collection.
No. 510656
>>15New Reddit thread.
Since anons on /ot/ always want to pull the "take it to GC/PP!" card.
No. 510659
File: 1576687942854.gif (1.42 MB, 400x261, grannies.gif)
Hail the new pink pill thread!
No. 510660
>>510658Anon, I read this and all I see is a woman smart and strong enough to have realized she deserves more in a place where EVERYTHING is telling her otherwise. I know what you mean about the things you can't change, but listen: every moment from now is yours, and now you're equipped with a whole new way of taking on the world. Your life as a liberated woman is going to outstrip the time you hadn't "put two and two together" in the end. You have so much more to look forward to than regrets to be plagued by.
And it's really never too late, and you've never made too many unfixable mistakes. So many of the most famous women in feminism had decades before they became who they were, in which they had terrible relationships with men, had children, were beaten. Andrea Dworkin married a man who beat the shit out of her and was forced into prostitution, THEN she became the uncompromising writer she became.
No. 510661
File: 1576701574176.jpg (79.47 KB, 563x517, e9c1c69b-2145-4b37-8b83-1a1340…)
Thank you based and blessed admin and staff.
No. 510663
File: 1576709049849.png (732.44 KB, 3868x1064, n5ol6zw5tw241.png)
>>510651uncropped version
No. 510665
File: 1576727541369.jpg (65.2 KB, 640x473, nhblkwji40j21.jpg)
No. 510673
File: 1576743048129.png (59.61 KB, 550x864, 1496828798711.png)
>>510652I'll contribute some
No. 510674
File: 1576743083775.png (81.92 KB, 1232x1079, 1546346940439.png)
No. 510675
File: 1576743153346.jpg (71.35 KB, 542x582, criminal-justice-system2.jpg)
No. 510676
File: 1576743181585.jpg (484.26 KB, 719x4408, dshala14wbx21.jpg)
No. 510677
File: 1576743209451.jpg (344.42 KB, 810x4812, g424vyi4i3y21.jpg)
No. 510678
File: 1576743270257.jpg (187.57 KB, 484x1136, Image1.jpg)
A couple for if you ever hear someone parroting that nonsense about lesbians having the highest rate of domestic violence
No. 510680
File: 1576743389319.png (87.55 KB, 500x380, tumblr_pwhe0iYlpl1rlsu93o1_500…)
No. 510681
File: 1576743492412.jpg (287.27 KB, 1069x3177, vaeqd5134qi31.jpg)
No. 510682
File: 1576743565223.png (749.84 KB, 501x2547, wrthgrjys.png)
No. 510683
File: 1576743609075.jpg (86.8 KB, 962x328, h73veozni0c2124.jpg)
Reminder to never, ever give old men the time of day let alone procreate with them
No. 510685
File: 1576743731127.jpeg (74.07 KB, 937x525, 1570897924234.jpeg)
In summary
No. 510687
File: 1576761851071.jpg (45.8 KB, 500x500, 29433248_1369671789804236_5835…)
>>510686it really bothers me how many women are pinkpilled but think trans women are exempt. Males lie constantly, why is them saying they're a woman any different?
No. 510689
File: 1576762877600.png (329.89 KB, 924x563, faggot.PNG)
In case anyone wants to see what muh sand tree actually looks like. Being called gay and a 'big girl blouse' sometimes. how horrifying!!! how unfair!!!!
No. 510690
File: 1576763513693.png (57.12 KB, 753x571, male identification.PNG)
>>510687>>510686>bad start. males are male because of biology. That's a pink pill belief. You can't identity your way into or out of being a scrote. Keep identity politics out of here.that's not what "male-identified" means. it's a feminist term from the 70s, it has nothing to do with trannies. it doesn't have to be women who are even straight, it's just women who prioritize the male perspective and relentlessly defend or prioritize males, male feelings, etc. they don't have to even be attracted to men do to so, it just has to do with seeing the world through the male perspective and caping for them/attacking for them.
No. 510692
>>510691Honestly, keep talking about the negatives of having children. No man is going to split the work with you, your career WILL suffer, when the male leaves he will not pay child support and if he does he'll end up paying some ridiculously low amount like one guy I know who was paying $30 a week for 2 kids under 10. He spent triple that on weed every week for gods sake.
Also he won't have to go through any of the physical side effects of pregnancy and there's a disturbingly high chance he will be sexually attracted to your child because of how many males are pedos. If you have a daughter he will assume he owns her body until he deems another male deserving enough of her.
If you decide to leave him and he wants to be a vindictive shit and file for sole custody, he will probably get it as in cases where men DO file for custody they get it more often than women.
Don't breed with moids. There's no real upside for women.
No. 510693
>>510667Porn ruins you. Wait for the dramatic rise of ED issues in young boys to old men with their desensitized dicks from porn to be targetted.
In SK men were killing themselves for it to legal while they simultaneously scream at women for not being traditional and submissive enough. It's clown world all around
No. 510694
>>510689The guy supports feminism and literally talks against
toxic masculinity in the next comments
(unnecessaryspeed4) No. 510696
>>510693Porn is a problem for people under 18 (or under 30, your mileage may vary) because they don't have any solid experience of what the real thing actually is.
They get all sorts of unrealistic expectations and don't seem to tell fiction from reality.
Just look at the various fetish threads on /g/ and /ot/.
No. 510699
>>510698i'm sorry, it is sad and serious, but this is post is hilarious and becomes even more hilarious when you scroll over the referenced post and are met with this
abusive loser's hysterically stupid manbaby face feathered in blue like a very dated jcpenney portrait studio photo
No. 510700
File: 1576782053484.jpg (49.49 KB, 529x508, qmf8svfbgmv01.jpg)
>>510669>>510698Of course he follows Kermit Memerson
No. 510703
>>510702Notice that they always write how she enjoys this to delude themselves into thinking what they're watching is ok because
she enjoys it despite it being called abuse.
No. 510705
>>510669I don't get why people like this don't have hits put on them, or at least get hit by trucks. The world is a pretty violent place, why hasn't that one suffered the brunt of it?
He is human filth.
No. 510707
File: 1576807757303.png (471.53 KB, 720x1127, 20191219_220717.png)
This is just devestating to see after the unimaginable hell he put his wife through.
No. 510710
>>510706Why don't self-identified feminists know what
toxic masculinity means? It's not just men being shitty, that's plain old masculinity.
Toxic masculinity is specifically when masculinity hurts the man himself. Like when men won't see therapists because mental healthcare isn't manly or some shit.
No. 510711
>>510709I've watched the fifth estate episode about her and sadly they were only ever in the position to be taken hostage initially because he manipulated her in their
abusive relationship into leaving the country with him to isolate her from her family. His being pardoned partially due to the PTSD that his
abusive actions caused her is sickening. He deserves to be a pariah to fucking civilized society.
No. 510713
i had a friend who was/is good to me, fairly charitable, willing to help, but it always comes back to this with men: your suffering will always be trivialized or fetishized. while he isn't a bad friend in how he treats me and does help me, he has a rape fetish and has told me if i ever were to get raped and i told him, he'd be more turned on than anything. i think almost all men are like this, and society only grades them based on their actual behavior towards women. how is that acceptable?
i encounter this over and over again. if my suffering is not completely ignored or trivialized, it's fetishized. more often than not though, it's completely ignored by men, like i'm not real or like i'm making everything up. it's so horrible for my mental health. i don't know how women can not feel sickened being around them. they don't feel any empathy towards us, ever, and i keep reading case upon case where women are in such horrible situations and there's simply no sympathy there, ever, and i see it in normie relationships all of the time. i don't know how women are happy to be around it. it's all about men. if anything, they become more agitated because women can't perform more labor for them when they're spread so thin by finances or whatever problems they have. there is never a reason to sacrifice anything for them and i really hate that when i spell this out for men or to women who aren't pinkpilled, that i literally cannot afford to expend any energy on them, in any regard, due to my circumstances, i'm "a narcissist", "selfish", etc. really and truly incredible the way we're beat down for recognizing that when it's a struggle to keep ourselves afloat, we can't possibly perform tons of emotional, sexual, manual labor for men, and that it's unreasonable for men to want us to pick open a vein and bleed out for them when we're fighting just to keep it together. i never see the same sympathy i see from women who recognize the men in their lives are struggling.
i have literally never seen women afforded the same understanding, ever. i'm just so disgusted being around them, having to speak to them. they're just so rotten.
No. 510715
>>510713>he has a rape fetish and has told me if i ever were to get raped and i told him, he'd be more turned on than anything.NOT A FRIEND
Dump the motherfucker
No. 510716
>>510713>if my suffering is not completely ignored or trivialized, it's fetishized. more often than not though, it's completely ignored by menAlso don't forget: When
they suffer it's a big fucking deal even if it's actually trivial or their own fault. It's stupid how women are played up like we're so melodramatic and exaggeratory. Actually when I see a woman upset it's for a legitimate reason most of the time.
Men though? A bad breeze could blow their way and make them pout and whine like the world is ending. I can think of a few recent examples.
One male friend went to the hospital for a planned minor surgery to his finger, and kept posting about it like he was having major heart surgery that he would never wake up from lmao. Of course he was okay, he was never going to die from a finger operation!
A different male friend has been all wigged out recently because he didn't know he had to submit pay stubs to begin the move-in process to join a 2 bedroom lease with his friend. Since he's a manbaby, he works two part time jobs and does one under the table. He'd been driving all over bedlam because his under-the-table boss didn't want to disclose the amount paid on a letterhead, and for some reason this friend thought a letter that said paraphrased 'I pay him, no really!' was going to suffice. Obviously when it wasn't accepted as proof of income, he had to drive all the way back. When he was ranting about this to me, I offered advice that maybe he should get that boss to rewrite the letter and email or fax it to the landlord so he doesn't have to drive another 2+ hours again. Nope, nope, nope. Made every excuse in the book as to why my reasonable suggestion just wasn't going to work even though he never asked. He'd rather waste more time driving all over the place than even attempt something sensible. On top of all that, he constantly bitches about not having money, and getting stiffed by his shitty music friends helping them set up gigs because he's too dumb to make sure he gets the money up front. He ranted to me last night about being too anxious and stressed out to do a drug run with his friend, but how he needs the money sooooo bad tho.
He wouldn't like the next set of advice I had for him, that is, get a real fucking job!
They reach out to women like me because they expect to be coddled, and be told that even though their problems are completely self-made that the world is a meanie doo doo head and they're such sweet lambs that everything will be okay.
No. 510722
File: 1577016880472.png (645.55 KB, 720x720, yui pain.png)
is it seriously not possible for a man to fully empathize with a woman?
i'm a romantic and love fuels me and i have an idealized version of relationships in my head and it hurts me over and over again. i got raped by my ex after my he dumped me for telling his friend about his abuse and he said i should have said no more so he knew i meant it and that i should've used a safe word even though i never used one. i also made him promise he wouldn't try to have sex with me the night before. he then threatened to kill me and refuses to admit he raped me.
current bf is a softboi type who grew up around women, very kind, but facefucks me until i'm gagging and crying (i consent and i enjoy it which is the worst part), can't go down on me for more than 2 minutes because it's tiring, former porn addict (blames this on depression). i love him but it's so bizarre that even the most skittish and quiet men are going to get off on seeing you choking. like i said, i'm into it, but that makes me feel so guilty
No. 510724
>>510676Wow. This one made me tear up.
Reminds me of my dad who (even though I love him) cant even be bothered to give my mom a day off and cook for her and the because "it's just not my thing".
Why are men so selfish
No. 510727
>>510717What anon at
>>510718 said. Honestly it's the best think you can do both for yourself and as a middle finger to them. It's exhausting, feeling the way you do, and I hit lows where I feel the same. Like, coexisting with men, even the ones who mean better than most, is like screaming into a room full of people and never being heard as if you're a literal mute. The pressure of that can be crushing. Even when they TRY they have a hard time understanding and respecting us, it's an uphill battle both ways. But. Please take care of yourself and do your best to just think like a "wgtow" as another anon said upthread. They don't respect us so you don't have to respect them. It's not worth your energy.
Also bless ya'll for this board, I lurked a lot because the constant handmaiden whine bullshit about the old threads stressed me out, as if women can't have one damn place on the entire internet where they vent about males when males have the rest of said entire internet to do it literally anywhere.
No. 510728
>>510722Ask yourself, do you really "enjoy" an activity that makes you gag and cry?
He isn't kind. He is selfish and hurts you.
No. 510729
>>510726>>510728i do enjoy it, but to be fair i have extremely low self-esteem and have struggled with self-hatred. i know he'd immediately be turned off and not want to do it if i told him i didn't like it, but it's terrifying that men can really genuinely enjoy this stuff and that he'd still want it secretly.
this is something i'm really struggling with, re: feminism. i genuinely enjoy being dominated in the bedroom and it's hard for me to tell if that's primal or if it's a result of conditioning and i don't know if i'm a bad person or bad feminist for enjoying this stuff.
also, i don't watch porn, it wasn't an influence at all
No. 510730
>>510729there are plenty of women who have "enjoyed" bdsm dynamics and getting slapped, choked, called degrading names, etc., myself included, only to later grow out of it, but it takes effort. ask yourself why you find it arousing - even if you don't watch porn, you already admit you have extremely low self-esteem and struggle with self-hatred that might feed into this idea that you need to be "put down."
i used to think it was just a primal thing for me. but for some reason, after getting therapy and dealing with my self-esteem in more constructive ways, as well as reading more feminist theory lol, i started thinking of getting hurt during sex as something legitimately disgusting. i know you want to believe your bf would be turned off if you didn't like it, but why does he find a girl who likes to gag and cry attractive?
try to take a step back from sex and re-evaluate your relationship because it's obviously affecting you more than you think because you feel all men are like this. i have had relationships with men who could not even engage in "dirty talk" where they called me a whore because they felt horribly about it. it's increasingly rare now, but if you think that all men fetishize your pain, then you either develop a learned helplessness where you accept that men who are cruel "in the bedroom" are the best you'll ever get, since they're "not that bad." take care of yourself, and if you really want to make a change, do it.
No. 510734
>>510733hope your divorce goes smoothly anon. me and my husband just had a big fight friday night about pornography after i brought up the stuff about hobo fights from
>>510667if i knew my scrote was looking at that shit it would be an absolute deal breaker
No. 510736
>>510729Anon, there is no such thing as a bad feminist. In being brave enough to look at these parts of your life with this kind of strength, even if you don't have any easy, simple answers about what to do yet, you are being a feminist. It's something we do and use to understand and change the world, not something we pin like a button to our chests.
It takes an insane amount of honesty to look at a situation like this and confront the things that scare you. I've been there. It's easier to be like "well I love him and I enjoy it, so." It's so hard to be like "yeah those are true and this still isn't right." It's the first step to real self-esteem I think, not the stupid fake empowerment version – you know you deserve a better world. And you do.
No. 510737
>>510733I don't want to search it myself, can someone tell me what "authentic" rape videos are? Like I have an idea but….is it supposed to be like snuff films, like an actual video of a real rape instead of porn actors attempting to create something that looks like a real rape?
(ofc porn is often rape anyway, but you know what I mean)
No. 510741
File: 1577145108350.gif (529.28 KB, 334x251, VapidGreatAmericancurl-small.g…)
>>510733Throw the whole man away.
No. 510750
>>510749I distinctly remember those stats on this dead website, this page is the closest I found to the specific info you're asking about.
>https://web.archive.org/web/20160316165633/http://www.divorcepeers.com/stats18.htmThis article refers more explicitly to the gender division
>https://www.liveabout.com/child-custody-there-is-no-gender-bias-during-custody-decisions-3974050>According to DivorcePeers.com the majority of child custody cases are not decided by the courts. In 51% of the cases, both parents agreed that mom be the custodial parent. In 29% of the cases, the decision was made without any third party involvement. Only 11% of custody cases were decided during mediation with as few as 5% being decided after court order custody evaluations.>In cases where both parents decided, without involvement from a mediator or the court 83% of the time the mother ended up with custody because the father chose to give her custody.Men who bitch about custody ~gender bias~ are the worst, because child rearing is one of the areas in which women are most discriminated against. I wish we weren't the main parent by default and that men were so passionate about raising their children that they truly fought for custody and proved themselves worthy, but it's not OUR fault if men don't want to take any responsibility. They're the ones who don't want custody to begin with, and don't do enough for their child to be considered the primary carer. And there is enough unpaid child support out there to prove that they truly do not give a shit about raising their children.
No. 510753
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/local/child-sex-trafficking-murder/I can't deal with this. They put this girl in jail for killing her rapist, a child sex trafficker. A grown man who took advantage of not just her, but multiple other girls, created CP of girls as young as 12, and pimped them out.
What the fuck is wrong with this planet? How is this "justice"? I feel sick.
No. 510755
>>510753Why the fuck are any children in prison for killing their trafficker /handler?? How much do they hate agency in girls that are pushed to their limit. Fucking unreal
This reminds me of all the stories of sex tourism too.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/dzak2f/this_article_completely_broke_my_heart/ (I know it's reddit but read that and try not to feel disgusted)
>girl interviews about prostitution is fucking 10>it costs less than 40 bucks to rape them Any incel/mra/mgtow/whatever that expresses interest in sex tourism is fueling child rape and sex trafficking.
No. 510756
File: 1577405460928.png (57.5 KB, 1535x426, ssss.PNG)
Why don't women approach me REEEEEEE
No. 510757
>>510747Just watched this two days ago. This is peak male violence at its absolute extreme and most unhinged. Every male member of this family is a complete fucking monster.
And of course the comments are full of "oh man what is wrong with humanity" like no dumbfuck, don't you mean what is wrong with males? Also I saw a bunch of males in the comments asking if anyone has the nude creepshots the father in law took of the woman and several other underage girls. Literally kill all straight men.
No. 510758
My father was/is a great dad to me and my siblings and a “good” husband to my mom I suppose. Not abusive or cheating but he’s typically lazy, no emotional intelligence, autistic manbrain, etc. They’re in their 50s and I’m fairly sure my mom would NOT be better off without him. But maybe that’s due to her physical and mental health issues. (She’d depend on us, her kids, a LOT more for sure, if they divorced now.)
I kinda want what she has, what my two grandmas had. I want a family with kids you can be proud of, that still do holidays with you when they’re grown, that will help out when needed. However I don’t want a husband who treats me like my dad treats my mom: the laziness, the indifference… (And not to start with my late grandfathers!)
My bf is good to me and I don’t want to break up but I don’t want kids with him. I don’t want my own kids at all, I don’t want pregnancy. I want to foster a kid or adopt one. But I don’t know if I can raise a child with him. It’s not going to happen in the foreseeable future but I can’t imagine breaking up for this dumb reason. I’d love to be with a woman (hell she can get pregnant! I’d support the hell out of her and our lovely country has wonderful adoption legislation for lesbian parents!) in my ideal future but my bf is too good to me to break up with just in case I find a better gf. Being childless with him forever also sounds like a pleasing future but then I’d miss out on my mother’s experience re: adult kids, that I’m jealous of.
No. 510759
>>510747Even that 911 call operator is a useless fucking scrote. Should lose his job, haughtily responding “we have to deal with life threatening situations first” SHE JUST TOLD YOU THERE ARE KIDS INSIDE AND SHE SMELLS GASOLINE!
Men are too dense to be in any position of care, especially one that involves listening VERY carefully and interpretating people that may not be making sense due to fear/shock. you have to explain every detail graphically to men because they’re too autistic to read between the lines.
No. 510761
I just read this article in a magazine and I'm still fuming. It was about a couple who had a toddler and then a very difficult baby, who didn't let them sleep properly for almost two and a half years, especially the mother. It got to the point she started exhibiting neurological symptoms, doctors began testing her for MS, brain tumours, etc. Eventually she physically collapsed and the paramedics assumed she'd had a stroke. Turned out it was all caused by sleep deprivation, no stroke or brain damage, literally just from not sleeping properly for almost 3 years. What did her husband do? He left her. She's still suffering with cognitive problems and memory loss, and has to take care of two young children alone.
Fucking seriously. Men are utterly void of empathy. He also suffered from the sleep deprivation, but his solution was to simply up and leave, rather than help his wife deal with the baby. He left his own children because he would rather get sleep. I hope he fucking rots.
No. 510762
File: 1577469562304.png (530.83 KB, 627x671, 02140A89-5E44-4612-85D8-B779B7…)
dare I say, ‘queen’?
No. 510764
File: 1577475897328.jpg (2.07 MB, 1536x2048, IMG_20191227_114418.jpg)
Is this really what it means
No. 510765
File: 1577477043648.jpeg (15.09 KB, 109x225, CC71D6EE-8B97-4A54-9D4E-59E491…)
I love companionship but I just have never met a man I tolerated or liked. They either have shit views or are pornsick. It makes me wonder if I genuinely want romantic companionship or that’s what I’ve been taught to want. It doesn’t help that I’ve got depression and no support system.
No. 510767
File: 1577510641554.png (2.24 MB, 1274x1490, tumblr_ae8907d95004aaae3df77d0…)
Just dropping this because it made me smile.
No. 510770
>>510768Sometimes I find myself looking through r/justnoso since the posts seem more genuine than relationship_advice. One time that sub lead me to another one, r/r4r, and I saw
multiple posts of guys posting there saying
>hey I'm married and I'm looking for someone to spend time with. my wife isnt affectionate anymore>my gf is asleep and I wanna see if anyone wants to chatIt's depressing
No. 510776
File: 1577670279558.jpeg (528.86 KB, 750x1211, 16F7E6EC-7FDC-4A60-B2F0-455693…)
Heartbreaking
No. 510778
>>510777Good advice but what was so creepy and gross to me was this coward going to a brothel to pay to use these sex trafficking
victims then ignoring this woman’s plea for help. Perverted, cowardly, and evil
No. 510782
>>510778Military men are very pro sex work since they're addicted to porn and porn stars, frequent strip clubs and prostitutes as apart of their "culture" I don't think I believe his statement though. I think instead of "shame" he was just a damn useless coward that didn't want to stir up drama at the brothel because he wanted to still buy a trafficked
victim. That whole part just makes me angry. Fuck anyone who thinks sex trafficking isn't a woman's issue that runs deep within many countries and organizations. Nobody will do anything because the sick demand is there.
>>510780I believe Van Der Sloot definitely killed her on that night she disappeared and had a friend depose of her. He was convicted of another murder later in Peru too and is still serving time for that.
No. 510784
File: 1577729668746.png (63.02 KB, 720x663, Screenshot_2019-12-30-13-20-11…)
In this episode of retards complaining about women for no reason on unrelated places, these faggots on a video about how Google spies on us.
This shit makes me so fucking angry, like bro a man can do shit poorly and people will blame it on HIM in particular for being an inept faggot but when a woman does something poorly it's always because she's a woman?
The worst part? It wasn't even a joke, it was just a girl saying that she finds funny that the guy in the vid talks about makeup without knowing about it or something (dunno, I don't know shit about makeup either), but of course these comedy masters interpreted it as a joke.
No. 510785
File: 1577746502917.jpg (242.84 KB, 720x814, 20191230_144056.jpg)
Lmao @ gAmeRbOiZ always taking credit for the top percentage of pro players so they can make generalizations about how males and females play. Fact of the matter is that most men I see play like absolute garbage and all of the confirmation bias in the world won't change the fact that you suck.
No. 510791
>>510787Junkos case haunts me. Sometimes I wish I had never learned of the details. Her captors were apart of the yakuza so learning how lightly they got off despite their crimes were beyond horrific was unsurprising, still depressing. She went through all of their evil because she apparently turned down one of the guys offer for a date. That was it. Pure fucking evil.
There has never been a horrific case where a group of women sexually tortured a man to that degree. Men's whining about "evil" women in divorce is so abysmal in comparison ita laughable
No. 510794
File: 1577835395170.jpg (22.44 KB, 620x349, sheilajeffreys.jpg)
>>510793You won't hear that stuff from radfems. Femcels are something else.
No. 510795
>>510793>pinkpill>radfem>femcelEh, I think you're confused. You don't have to be pinkpilled or a radfem to be femcel. Femcels are females who don't get laid and whine about their situation, period.
Pinkpill in general is an ideology revolved around criticizing males and their shitty behaviour, radfeminism focuses on gender and sex work abolition.
I think everyone mixes the terms, just like people who think that everyone who is against transactivism is a radfem (conservatives are against it, but for completely different reasons lol).
I remember there was a warning on previous threads telling femcels not to sperg lol.
No. 510799
>>510787I always remember her and those three American girls who were kidnapped and raped for years by a fucker who hanged himself in prison. I always remember them when people say "females have rights, you live in the first world, hurr durr". Not only them suffered an horrible destiny, but all the women who are killed everyday, having their lifes taken by males, coward psychopaths who commit suicide afterwards. Imagine that, imagine being erased from existence by a fucking male just because you didn't catter to his tastes, to his fantasies. Imagine it, in just a second your life is gone. It's sickening.
Being female is a constant fight, be it in third world or first world. It's insane.
No. 510801
>>510799And then men minimize it by saying "um?? acksually men get murdered more you dumb bitch kys whore" as if there is NOTHING in common with the perpetrators of these crimes.
Could…males be the problem? Hmmmmm…
No. 510803
>>510787>>510799You gals accidentaly made me remember the Delphi Killer case. God, I can't wait till the fucker gets caught. I believe sooner or later he will meet justice just like Joseph James DeAngelo aka Golden State Killer did.
I know lolcow has a low opinion of Reddit, but reading true crime subreddits like r/Delphimurders or r/unresolvedmysteries give me life. So many people doing their best so that motherfuckers who hurt innocent girls and women may get fried. I love how most redditors on those subs are full of empathy toward the
victims.
No. 510808
>>510784This is the kinda shit that peaked me. When you're just minding your own business and you're suddenly reading an onslaught on sexist bullshit outta nowhere. Men can not turn it the fuck off and youtube etc see 0 wrong with these comments.
>>510785It's funny because anytime I played LoL or another dota with a male they would get distracted by the fighting over objective. Every single fucking time. Men are completely unable to stay on objective.
>>510787Arguing with a scrote is like arguing with a 7 year-old. They're not going to be swayed by logic or emotion because they're convinced their personally feelings on the situation is right.
No. 510809
File: 1578113684969.jpg (63.16 KB, 500x375, tumblr_e9a635bf2414fe5bf1dc683…)
Hello my fellow obsese furry legged frens
This is always the best they can come up with?
No. 510811
File: 1578164066493.jpg (820.23 KB, 1067x1607, gross.jpg)
There's so much porn but it's still not enough. They have to involve people who aren't consenting. Alot of sexual predators use these hot lines like this too.
When reading the thread there was one incel defending this shit, saying how loneliness is the worst and that assault is due to desire, not power. The state of it all.
No. 510816
>>510815>>510813they're pathetic. they make completely disparate comparisons that make no sense, they strawman the fuck out of us, etc. any minor complaint about rfs or ppers will be piggybacked and mindlessly repeated, filled with dramatizations that don't even ring true about us. ironically almost all of their accusations are purely projection. what's particularly annoying is that i'd be willing to wager that most of us that are pinkpillers and radfems ARE the oldfags, and yet we're treated like a group that has recently migrated here. uh, no. growing up in my early teens on 4chan and seeing how men and boys operate, how they're groomed into becoming pornaddled abusers, 'radicalized' me very early.
honestly think we should just recreate all threads here. anons cant even vent about a man specifically causing them problems (bf, dad, brother) without being told to "go back to the containment thread". the problem that "gtfo femcel" women have is that they don't understand that in a society built entirely by men and for men, most problems women have, will trace back to them.
No. 510817
File: 1578184932082.jpeg (382.8 KB, 750x943, D44CC3DA-0CEF-41AE-8130-41C1FB…)
https://www.boredpanda.com/make-women-great-again-22-convention/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=BPFacebook&fbclid=IwAR3FUtWb9hagt_1csCikl-jVNBzjxODGxk__WJQ5vYKaXYahXyfvSj0YIYAHave you guys heard about this shitshow? Men really think this sounds appealing? Popping out as many babies as we can so we have no identity, career, hobbies, independence, etc. most men these days don’t even afford to raise ONE child without having their partner work as well
No. 510820
>>510818>>510819I'm on here and been here since 2014 rip.
it also just aligns with life. younger women are more likely to be NLOGs since that's the prime bracket where that behavior is rewarded and they don't have much life experience yet. it's one thing to see guys being stupid when everyone around you is still stupid and developing, but it's another thing entirely when you start trying to build a life for yourself and actually start hitting the roadblocks that are set up against women.
No. 510821
>>510819also, yeah 4chan was my first dose of the pink pill. I used to hang around /int/ and specifically in the CulturePals threads (a social networking website geared towards messaging and connecting with international users). i think it was primarily used for language exchange, but obviously people would use it to meet others to date or hook up. Well the 4chan threads were superficially about finding some qt foreign waifu to practice language with, but really they just used it to collect nudes and lead on these women. Some would brag about all the women they were lying to about being in love with or start a relationship just to post their selfies or nudes on fucking 4chan for other scrots to trash them for nothing. and had all the typical misogynistic trappings of the submissive East Asian or eastern European women.
they would share tips on how best to manipulate women into sharing nudes or camming with them (and they never failed to screenshot or record those sessions).
anyway, I try not to pay too much attention to the current pickmes and tradthots as lolcow was so much worse about NLOGing back in the day
No. 510822
File: 1578195159286.png (45.68 KB, 1309x457, meta.PNG)
>>510821>anyway, I try not to pay too much attention to the current pickmes and tradthots as lolcow was so much worse about NLOGing back in the dayi try not to either, but they're crying to admin in meta about "femcel politics" and want her to get rid of 2X already, ot pinkpill/GC, or both 2X and threads in ot. they keep insisting pp/"femcel politics" talk on the site is completely due to newfag twitter feminist infiltration, that oldfags aren't pinkpillers, and that we're "chasing off the core userbase".
anyways, vote in this poll admin made:
https://forms.gle/sJCd6JpUPGVAjYfDA to keep 2X, because if there aren't enough votes to keep it, admin is going to get rid of it in 7 days, and between NLOGers and tumblrfags, and some amount of shifty males, i wouldn't be surprised if they influenced her to get rid of everything – the thread in /ot/, and this board. they cry and whine so much to get rid of anything they dislike, like lolcow is literally just theirs.
No. 510824
File: 1578195696205.jpg (275.98 KB, 720x878, 20200104_193208.jpg)
Where do they find the audacity to claim that the West treats men like second class citizens and compare it to how women are treated in Middle Eastern totalitarian countries. I'm really just fucking disgusted…
No. 510828
>>510817This was talked about in the other gc thread. Stefan still believes in the "90% of eggs gone by 30" fake fact to scare uninformed and insecure white women into making a permenant decision (he did also lately go after Leo Decaprio for being 45 and not settling down either and talked about aging sperm surprisingly) and he's pushing how women should be dropping everything to marry the first alt right guy they see. Meanwhile America is ranked as the worst first world nation to be in as a pregnant woman/to give birth in. It's also expensive to live in a good safe area to raise all those kids in on a single income.
In attendance? No more than maybe 50, all middle aged men.
No. 510833
File: 1578251352853.png (168.18 KB, 1305x295, r9k.PNG)
>>510831i don't know. farmhands and admin both don't seem to like pp/rf shit, from what i can tell, especially farmhands, telling radfems to "go, your kind isn't wanted here". i just don't know where the fuck people get the idea that everyone who is rf or pp aligned is a newfag and that oldfags are beyond female politics. i agree with you that i think men are influencing the site. i think it's also very unfair that posters are expected to know when anons are male or just females that have a hateboner for controversial thought. we have no information about the posters, we know males deliberately ruined crystal.cafe and purposefully influenced the direction of the site, etc. there's reason for anons to suspect that males try to influence, and even if they don't, why do anons that are anti female politics demand that everything they dislike be off the site? it's just so sketch and entitled. i don't even know why admin gives any credence to people who are rabidly anti-rf/female politics, as it obviously suits men, tumblr/twitterfags, troons, etc, to keep it suppressed, and i assume not everyone chiming in has a lengthy post history to determine they're female, and even if they do, they straight up pose as us regardless to further their agenda. (pic related)
No. 510835
File: 1578256163489.jpeg (109.26 KB, 482x419, E6542067-A1D8-4C37-87D1-35AE28…)
>>510833I don’t trust anyone here who goes out of their way to shit on feminism, not even with the ~uwu i agree I’m just tired~ thrown in.
Stuff like this is 100% Male, black and white male thought pattern and aggressive language, wanting to destroy anything even slightly unpleasent to their delicate senses. I don’t want radical feminism to be a taboo subject on here, if there are any genuine female farmers on this recent campaign to de radicalise lolcow then colour me fucking shocked, because the whole notion is an un-female thing to do. Females aren’t regarded enough to try and wipe the earth clean of opposing opinions, not even ones that directly hurt them, which is even more retarded because it means we will keep being walked all over forever lol I won’t have it, I don’t see what’s so bad about strangers on the internet thinking I’m a psycho legbeard, there’s worse things to be for sure (like, for instance, any sort of Male in general kek)
No. 510836
File: 1578257310415.jpg (23.91 KB, 500x483, ae543e233abf911a9c3e2127037312…)
>>510835Agreed. Why the fuck are supposed farmers fighting so hard to keep radical feminist threads contained in 2X anyway? If it's away from the other boards, why does it even matter? This over-zealousness for cracking down on radfem stuff on lolcow is suspicious for sure.
Seriously anons, disengage from these screaming harpies and let 2X go on a trial period. If it fails, then it fails. But if you screech so much about a board that you don't even have to be a part of, you are a guaranteed scrote or a major handmaiden. Have a little respect for yourselves, goddamn.
No. 510837
File: 1578257858645.png (30.76 KB, 1222x343, rf.PNG)
>>510834her decision to make 2X or vote is not the reason why i think she isn't a fan of female politics. i'm glad she made 2X, but i don't see it staying because of the input of weirdly rabid anti-radfem/anti-female politics posters that come in to aggressively complain every week. there have been a number of times where admin and the farmhands have made it clear they do not like radfems. i can't go looking for them all, but they're in meta and in the previous threads.
No. 510839
>>510835>if there are any genuine female farmers on this recent campaign to de radicalise lolcow then colour me fucking shocked, because the whole notion is an un-female thing to do. Females aren’t regarded enough to try and wipe the earth clean of opposing opinions, not even ones that directly hurt them, which is even more retardedit is so aggressively male. i don't even know how anyone can mock people figuring they seem male when they say shit like "kill yourself" or speak as they do in your post. what do they expect? if you act like a damn near pickme by picking up their aggressive typing/speaking patterns, that's not our fault. i honestly believe there are a few females complaining genuinely about it. probably younger anons afraid of feeling like uncool crones, likely newer users. there are a lot of anons here who even date guys from r9k and whatnot that i'm sure get absolutely assblasted when the possibility that their discord discount prince of their dreams is not actually worth what they invest in him and see in him, tbh.
>>510836>But if you screech so much about a board that you don't even have to be a part of, you are a guaranteed scrote or a major handmaiden. Have a little respect for yourselves, goddamn.agreed, but the problem is that they have as much "voting power" as us, despite how fucking weird it is that they want to immediately get rid of a board that literally just started, that is literally hidden. like, you have to be weird and insanely invested in ridding the site of people who disagree with you. like clockwork, they run to /meta/ and complain again, before this board has even had a chance. it's just so strange that every few weeks they call for everyone and everything rad leaning to be eliminated, but act like we're the unreasonable ones.
No. 510841
File: 1578261068332.jpeg (304.09 KB, 420x974, FD0EC5EB-0054-4335-BFC1-FFE773…)
>>510822Another Male - the absolute raging distain coming from this below comment. Not even a handmaiden or tranny would talk like this.
No. 510843
File: 1578268519601.png (1.5 MB, 1167x977, C55FUko.jpg.png)
>>510841Since when do real women use 'females' as a way to address or talk about other women?
No. 510844
>>510822>vote in this poll admin made…to keep 2XWould it not make more sense to get rid of 2X but keep the pp/gc/radfem threads in /ot/? That's also an option on the survey. Having 2X feels like we're being hidden from the rest of the site and eventually it will totally change the culture of /pt/ and /snow/ if discussion of men and trans issues is banned.
It's an imageboard, it's going to attract all kinds of people. The best thing to do if you don't like something is to ignore it, not shove it onto a secret board and beg the admin to align with your political views ffs.
No. 510845
>>510844I voted to keep all of it. The way I see it, the PP/GC thread on /ot/ can be for people who want to casually participate in shitting on men and trannies when they feel like it, and to keep the manhate alive within board culture. /2X/ can stay secret and be for women who take it a little more seriously and might want to start individual threads about smaller feminism related issues that would otherwise clog up the /ot/ thread. I like that it's a bit more quiet on these threads and won't attract maleposters or not my nigel types, because they won't drive-by post while scrolling /ot/.
>>510841Talking about 'empowerment' sure makes it sound like a dumbass scrot who can't tell the difference between libfems and radfems.
No. 510846
>>510844>it will totally change the culture of /pt/ and /snow/ if discussion of men and trans issues is banned.Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't GC langauge like pronoun stuff etc. already bannable on those? The Remilia thread already got into that territory which resulted in bans.
Honestly imo it's better if we have 2X so there are less trolls fighting with us all the time.
No. 510848
File: 1578344016076.jpg (358.43 KB, 1717x2289, PicsArt_01-06-08.50.41.jpg)
mEn AgE lIkE fInE wInE
No. 510854
File: 1578370802353.jpg (208.67 KB, 1024x824, 1578370221237m.jpg)
No. 510859
File: 1578434288342.png (24.59 KB, 654x376, Hacker Factor Gender Guesser.…)
>>510841I don't know about that one, but some complaints in /meta/ do sound very unnecessarily aggressive, like
>>12829 . I ran this one through the gender guesser for the lols, the verdict was ruthless, kek.
No. 510867
>>510864nevermind, i found it!
>>510866i honestly dont believe theyre troons. maybe a few are troons or troon aligned, like, one aiden seems to be posting, but i think theyre just anti-feminist men or useful idiot women that think they're above female politics and that the discussions we have aren't worth having/your average male caper whose blood pressure goes up everytime a general statement is said about men being shit because her grandpa favored her over her siblings and paid for her tuition or something.
No. 510869
File: 1578479663693.jpg (145.67 KB, 719x522, Screenshot_20200108-082439_Chr…)
This site is overrun with scrotes and I am fucking sick of it. It it so obvious that the recent hatred towards female oriented issues/man hate/feminism is because of a recent influx of trolls, and dumb newfags who believe they are real users. I've been here since 2014 and it has been a natural progression here towards more political female topics. The "radfems" is the old grown up userbase.
Plus, its a womens site for women, why shouldn't we be able to discuss topics that directly relate to being female? Talk about experiences that are universally female? What's the point of it being a womens only site if we can't talk about female only issues?
No. 510870
>>510869>The "radfems" is the old grown up userbase. Thank you for saying this. I'm so sick of some people insisting pink pill and GC anons came from somewhere else, and are "outsiders". I actually think they might be projecting, because anyone who's truly been here knows that this has never been a male-friendly site. Honestly, this is the natural progression of things. Do people really expect women who are engrossed in imageboard culture
not to get sick of men's shit? When we've gotten full blast of it, uncensored, since we were kids? Why on earth should we have to either discuss politics among those same sociopathic men, or deal with handmaidens on places like Reddit who truly don't realize how bad it is? We've been here all this time.
I wish the self-proclaimed "true userbase" who claim to speak for oldfags would just head back to Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, PULL and IG, because it's glaringly obvious that's where they
actually came from, and they want LC to be an outpost of their own lame communities. They probably believe browsing since 2018 (and kind of knowing about the site, but being too scared to use it in 2017) makes them oldfags.
As for why some are so vehemently against us discussing these things, I think it's because they still have this idea in their minds that if enough women just "act right", even in our most obscure spaces (like anonymous imageboards), men will renounce misogyny and start listening to women. They think that by us talking about these things, we're fucking it up for everyone by making men hate us even more (as if anything we do/say actually matters when it comes to misogynists).
They probably worry about some incel finding Lolcow, screencapping the most misandrist posts with a caption like "This is why I'm anti-feminist", having the post go viral on Reddit or something, then themselves offhandedly mentioning IRL that they browse Lolcow (which they shouldn't be doing, but I've already seen one anon complaining that they don't want to "associate themselves" with a site known for TERFs, so you know that's what they're like), and their friends going "What? You use that man-hating TERF/SWERF website??", destroying their reputation and rendering them "
problematic", all because some uppity bitches on the site (aka us) wouldn't just stay silent.
There's also a certain amount who get offended on behalf of their boyfriends, fathers and brothers. The joke is that the men in their lives most likely don't try to silence other men when they talk shit about women.
The rest are probably men trying to "colonize" this site, because they think they have a right to everything.
No. 510871
File: 1578487026336.jpg (123.28 KB, 960x1086, dadad.jpg)
a bitoff topic but can we avoid using the term male hate and instead use man hate, I feel the term unfairly lumps male animals in with the evilness absurdity of men
No. 510874
>>510869>>510870Fuck, I agree with absolutely all of this.
I have been on here since 2015, and yes, I agree that lolcow has been naturally gearing into these politics and it was 100% a natural progression, and not some random forced shit that these obvious scrotes/pickmes claim. The fact that there are so many women SO OFFENDED by the existence of pp/gc threads is mindboggling. I bet these are the same losers sperging about some cow looking 15 pounds overweight over in /pt/ and launching out other obsessive, cringeworthy and detailed misogynistic insults all over the board, cause why else would they hate it?
No. 510876
>>510816I know I'm late to this but wtf is happening to this site? The site feature thread is full of men/trannies calling women TERFs and femcels and the admins aren't even banning them? Why the hell are they holding "polls". If the admin wants pp/gc thread on the site just fucking say that and move the hell on. Why are they so worried about catering to people who aren't regular users here. I've been coming here off and on for years, and now a bunch of spergs who found this site via Onision threads want to start making demands?
Like the mods are telling people not to post reddit screenshots in gg/pp threads, but then I saw someone get banned for posting a reddit screenshot in the thread because "this belong in GC" lmao.
Some pp/gc'er needs to make a board just for radfems etc.
No. 510880
File: 1578492140285.jpg (31.56 KB, 465x466, 0oyhednpai941.jpg)
No. 510882
>>510861They're afraid of women being
radicalized aka
saying no and having confidence.
They are that scared.
>>510870I wouldn't be surprised if most of the people here in 2x have been following this website for 3-4 years. It makes sense to have this kind of progression, women are already feeling this way IRL but this is a place they started to vent and it became this way.
>>510880yep, this shit and the amputee shit really freaked me out
There was a anon (possibly male) in /g/ talking about this as their fetish. Also a lot of the feeder fetishist in /g/ as well follow this same theme of "I like it when they are dependent on me (aka trapped and can't escape)"
No. 510885
ok i think you guys are gonna enjoy this one. it’s short and sweet but just happened yesterday so here we go
for context i went to and graduated from a small trade college last year and made a lot of friends in a class that was next to mine, we mostly just hung out at smoke breaks and shot the shit. i thought everyone was cool with me because nobody ever acted like they had a problem and i never gave them a reason to. i finished my course and moved on and i’m studying at another college now to build onto what i was learning previously. apparently this entire time, there’s been a scrote trying to sabotage my reputation for unknown reasons. a couple people had told me he messaged them complaining about my instagram stories, which was weird but i brushed it off because this guy has emotional issues from being in current recovery from alcoholism. no biggie.
anyway yesterday someone spammed me on IG by unsending a bunch of old messages so i posted about it. when this happens and you have more than 1 acc attached to your main instagram, it shows the username of the account that received it in the notification. so like “(accountnamehere) this message is no longer available because it was unsent.” well, this guy saw it, thought the messages were FROM me and apparently didn’t notice he was relying to MY story, so he replied saying “i know that dumb bitch, she went to my school she’s a jealous nasty bitch” verbatim and my reaction was “lmao what” because it was so random i thought he was literally kidding. like making a shitty joke that didn’t land. but no, when he realized it was me, he blocked me bc he knew he fucked up lol.
after posting about it i learned he’s actually been harassing my childhood friend at her work every single day. turns out he’s given up recovery and is back on the bottle (she’s a hostess in a bar/grill place) and making the poor girl extremely uncomfortable, hitting on her in the DMs etc. he’s had a girlfriend for 6+ years, btw.
best part of all this? i found out he failed his fucking course!!! karma is so goddamn sweet. i graduated with flying colours and he got absolutely nothing but a wasted $10k and had to move back in with his parents. it satisfies me so much knowing this fucking loser will never have a life.
No. 510887
>>510885Men get very angry when woman excel at anything more than them. Here's an interesting study on video games. They found that a woman playing well = insulted by men playing worse than her. Men playing better/at her level didn't get insulting.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0131613Males like the one you mention KNOW they are at the bottom of the pile when it comes to men. They feel like at the very least they're not women. Then along you come, getting better grades etc. You shit over his perception of life lmao. You got him fucked up by just existing.
No. 510889
File: 1578523329648.png (63.82 KB, 265x252, good person vs bad.png)
Ok gyns, I need your advice.
There is a small group of male professors at my uni that are friends with predators outside the school, and one of the profs is himself a sleazebag.
The sleazebag prof isnt a predator per se but he will invite students at parties taking place in different venues and when we come, he's always hitting up on or making out with girls as young as 18 (he's 40).
One of his close friends actually sexually abused a close acquintance of mine and tried to rape her, and another of his very close friends dated my best friend (20 years age gap) and their whole relationship was a toxic mess and he clearly profitted of the fact she was vulnerable and used her.
After they broke up, he went to hang out with a group of several of our profs and they had a long talk about her. They literally spent 2h talking about his almost purely sexual relationships with one of their students. And he bragged about it to her.
Now I'm in a very "liberal" art school. A lot of activism and "controversial" stuff is encourraged.
I was thinking of making posters against on of the profs with his photo and a drawn target on his face and a text along the lines of "Kill predators and their friends" and glueing them all over school.
The thing is, while I would be ready to be held accountable for that action, I know that my friends (who are the actual victims, and I know they're not the only ones) wouldn't.
They're both shy with mental health issues and just want to avoid the drama and move on from the abuse which I tottally respect.
I don't want to put them in positions of vulnerability and discompfort but I'm also sick of my college pretending to be "woke" and "feminist" while tolerating shit like this.
I also have a history of being labeled as a "crazy radfem" and fear not being taken seriously, if word ever got out that I was the one behind that.
what do
No. 510890
>>510889i feel that this is too risky to chance and is likely to backfire. i think there are more impactful ways to communicate this message. perhaps waiting a while would be better, and just doing something else entirely too. i would wait until your friends are graduated, tbh. they may get attacked/targeted for anything you may do, and this is already just kind of not a good bet/safe idea. if you have proof of them being predatory, see if you can factor that into whatever exposé you try to plan. maybe you can do something more along the lines of "OUR PROFESSOR, X, IS A PREDATOR", rather than bringing up killing them. or "EXILE ALL PREDATORS", something like that, i think, would be better.
No. 510891
>>510871Male animals frequently rape female animals, biologists call it "sexual coercion" since rape requires a legal definition and only applies to humans but it's basically rape.
>>510875Male cats have barbed dicks so cats have some of the shittiest PIV sex ever.
No. 510892
>>510890You're right. The "kill" thing wasnt like a sure thing, it was more of an exemple. But I deff don't want to bring troubles to my friends.
It just kills me that in my social circle those kind of things are so acceptable because "muh open minded artists" and the age of consent being 15 here.
No. 510894
>>510889I experienced a similar situation and I don't recommend a personal "vendetta", the rapist could press charges for defamation and harassment (true story!). The only exception would be if you plan to pay someone to beat him up lol.
First do your friends want to press charges ? If not at least encourage them to tell their story, anonymously or not, for the students to see. Try to take actions collectively with other students, alone you can't do shit. Then contact family planning and associations to come in your school and talk about sexual abuse+abuse of power. Do not hesitate to put up posters about sexual violence. Again for this to be effective, it must be done by a group of students. Otherwise the administration would quickly shut this down because these piece of trash avoid problems and responsability at any cost.
No. 510897
>>510895White men do the same to MoC. Like on /pol/ they all go on about how they should "ally" with TERFs but hope that these women "wake up" and see the "real problem" is non-white men and Jews because "white men protect women and gave them their rights". Men do not care about women but will use how they treat women to act morally superior to each other. I often see them complaining on /int/, /pol/, Reddit or whatever about Muslim men too for being "barbarically misogynistic" before going on about how much they hate women and how they love to pay for sex every month.
I also think a lot of MoC are angry at white men for colonising their countries and raping their women during the New Imperial era and creating a racial hierarchy with white on top (obviously this did happen and we can still see the ramifications of this today). But when it comes to women of their ethnicity being attacked by white men, it's more because they view those women as their "property" and that attacking them was an attack on their race/ethnicity/culture. A lot of WoC have internalised racism so they desire to be white and think white men are the best because of media so seek out white men to date (I know so many WoC who want half-white babies because they know it will improve their status and because their children will be "higher status").
To MoC, these WoC dating outside their race thought of as "race traitors" but if a MoC marries a white woman then he is viewed as successful or "getting back at white men". I always see white men vs. MoC over female sexual conquest. Since white men seen as desirable across the world and with way more WoC dating white men than white women dating MoC, white men are viewed as the "winners". Maybe since so many MoC think that because white men have both white and male privilege then whatever they do themselves does not matter as much or is not as harmful as whatever a white man does.
Although some MoC who are incels have twisted "white privilege" into meaning that white men have an easier chance of getting laid and some even believe it is impossible for white men to be incels because there will always be a WoC who will have sex with them.
No. 510898
>>510889>while I would be ready to be held accountable for that action, I know that my friends (who are the actual victims, and I know they're not the only ones) wouldn't.I would listen to them and respect them
If you want to fight the good fight, just protect more women from them directly rather than putting up a bunch of posters
if they are acting sleazy at a party, call them out on it
ask female students if they need someone to attend office hours with them
I know what it's like to want to just rip someone apart for hurting your friends and "getting away with it", but there are more things you can do
No. 510900
>>510870I think the only reason anyone has any point to that is that the threads are called "Pink Pills", instead of literally anything else that isn't just co-opting a meme that's been re-tread so many times
There are so many other people (men) who do that for their own stupid philosophy, it's only natural for someone to hear "COLOR" Pilled and think it's just a dumb 4chan offshoot
No. 510905
>>510895I like to refer to this mentality as "no one can abuse our women except us!" These men will leap to any opportunity to insult men of another group for physically harming women of their own race/ethnic group, but they will be silent as stones when one of them kills or rapes a woman of their own group. Women are simply props in this argument. It's a way to compete and fight with another group of men. If they really gave a shit about "their" women, then they would become advocates to solve issues that strongly affect Black/Asian/White/etc. women or broader women's issues like pregnancy discrimination in the workplace.
I'm white, and I regularly read and monitor white nationalist websites. White nationalist men will write angry rants and threats whenever a white woman is raped or killed by a non-white man. What do you think happens when a news story emerges of a white man murdering his white girlfriend or wife like the tragic deaths of Shanann Watts and her two daughters by her husband Chris Watts? Abso-fucking-lutely nothing. This tragedy was not mentioned on any of the white nationalist websites or podcasts I observe. These websites also call any white woman who's dated a non-white man at some point in her life a "traitor." Amusingly, they have whipped themselves into a paranoid frenzy, and many are convinced that all white women are whores who lust over black men.
The seemingly contradictory attitudes of revulsion and protection towards women of their own race serve two purposes: 1. To compete with and fight other men from different ethnic groups 2. To subjugate women and keep them in an inescapable inferior status.
No. 510908
File: 1578546628446.png (81.97 KB, 1235x387, ok.PNG)
thoughts on admin's post?
i think 2X was a great decision. it was a smart move and i think it's fab. i'm thankful for her work, but based on the polls, so far it would appear the majority of people voting are heavily, heavily favor of having a space for female politics. granted, it could be skewed, but i doubt it considering all the kickup by the dedicated anti pp/gc anons. i'm really not sure why despite this, she acts like pp/gc anons are such a minority of the core userbase. she gives so much weight to the complaints of literally everyone else, but consistently diminishes ours, like we're definitely all just a vocal minority of twitter users that recently came here, and that literally everyone anti pp/gc is the REAL userbase. are rival camgirls and anti-onision 19 year old twitter users the real userbase then?
/r/gendercritical users that only found this site are totally different and i really do not like that manhate anons are grouped in with them.
it's also like everyone is blind to the instigation by by obviously anti-female issues farmers, too, even when they're insanely aggressive and ironically, entitled. people who frequently and angrily (sort of out of nowhere) demand for the banning of the topic and users entirely, or even demand the nuking of /ot/ entirely, and seem obviously like MRA/incel males LARPing. they seem to get a pass to say anything. i don't really get it tbh. what i dislike about this post is that it gives validation to males and seemingly male-identified women.
No. 510909
>>510907I look at them because I've always been intrigued by how people with extremist political ideologies think and what drives people towards them. What are the factors that lead one middle class white male towards these views while other white men who grew up in the same area with the same socioeconomic background have no attraction to them? It's also amusing to watch them wrestle with the various contradictions in their ideology and argue over who's really white and who isn't.
The other major reason I observe these websites is for my own good while dating. White nationalists are near universally misogynistic, yet strongly desire to have tons of white children. All but the top tier spergs know revealing their true views will drive women away, so they won't say them unless they're certain their date has enough handmaiden tendencies to tolerate them. However - they have a certain way of speaking and using slang that can be picked up on with experience. I live in a mostly white and conservative area, so I'd prefer to avoid being attached to someone who sees me as nothing more than a baby factory who shouldn't have any rights.
No. 510911
>>510908Admin and the farmhands are all newfags, its very obvious. They all sound like they are straight out of pull, act very childish and fuel the infighting. They never adhere to board culture either.
Banning political females to appease whining men pretending to be women, hell even the old male admin had more solidarity with women than them.
No. 510912
>>510908Unfortunately I don’t see /2X/ or the /OT/ thread lasting, which is a shame. Not a new fag but I’ll give credence to the fact that the only reason I really stick around this site anymore is for the gender critical discussion so once that’s gone I can see myself not returning or just visiting very infrequently. I don’t post often and hardly lurk outside of /OT/ nowadays but I keep seeing it mentioned that /GC/ and /PP/ discussion gets leaked into other threads. Maybe I’m blind or just very ignorant, but I don’t really see this as being the case. The most I see is someone either refusing to use pronouns but not really drawing attention to it or posts that aren’t male-positive which farmers then respond to and wank about.
I don’t know. It’s clear to me that admin and co. are really pushing back on this despite claims otherwise. She can run the website however she wants but I would have a lot more respect for her if she was more transparent about it. I think the worry farmers have regarding male invasion is very real and given how little spaces there are for women on internet, it’d be a shame to lose this one, but as a casual user and mostly lurker it is frustrating watching this happen and I don’t know if I want to stick around to watch it unfold anymore.
For the record I think /2X/ is a great idea and I’m among the anons that think it should stay as a space for us to talk about women’s issues and empowerment. I understand why people have reservations about it being unlisted and an argument could be made for why that’s a bad thing, but I like the fact that it’s hidden. There’s less opportunity for trolling and the people complaining about the political discussion could opt to ignore it (which I know isn’t happening just looking at /meta/, but in a perfect world this would be the case and so far I haven’t seen any belligerent anons storming this board).
I guess what I’m saying is that I would love for this discussion to stick around but I’m not holding my breath since there’s so much pushback. The /GC/ threads were what really helped me reconcile my views as both a former libfem they/them who was genuinely contemplating transitioning and a closeted, traumatized bisexual, and I think it’s helped others in similar ways. I suppose we’ll have to see what happens but I am really thankful for the discussion here regardless of what happens.
No. 510913
>>510908I think admin is just fessed up from the personal attacks on her and the staff and hoped the recent changes would make them stop completely, of course that is extremely frustrating but I agree that a lot of that post is bothering me.
What is up with the "we vs. them" thinking? I saw it a lot in the meta thread too, but seeing admin take the same stance is upsetting. If she thinks anons who are interested in pp, gc and female politics are mostly outsiders, a vocal minority(contrary to the polls) and newfags (and where are they supposed to come from? reddit? how is twitter supposed to organize itself to raid the threads?), why not invent a way to block direct linking from certain outside sources and/or issue warnings/bans for certain reddit and twitter lingo(if there is something like that)?
Like I agree that the 'admin-team are trannies' tinfoils are really annoying now and that the specific anons admin is refering to in her posts are retarded, especially after admin made this board, but they aren't really doing a great job in explaining the weird focus and hostility on pp/gc either (from the closure of the manhate thread to everything that happened after it) so that others can understand it. I browse /ot/, /snow/ and /w/ daily, but only saw visible bans for pp sperging 3 times. The meta thread complaints aren't helpful either because they are way too vague. And I don't want to invalidate them, I literally don't understand what they are talking about, they just say variations of 'derailing in /ot/' and 'sperging in the vent thread' without mentioning what kind of post or post content they mean but then I visit those again and don't find posts talking about female politics or tranny politics and don't know what they reference to. It's even harder now since gc and pp are lumped together as one userbase. Is it about the anons who vent about their bfs or talking about trannies in a disrespectful way? Encouraging violence on men has been discouraged within threads and banned as femcel sperging since the manhate threads, so I don't get the fear of radicalization as an argument to close it down either. I wish they'd just be more specific in their reasoning, because otherwise it's not too far fetched to jump to the conclusion that the issue is a personal one.
And the antagonizing and aggressive behaviour absolutely goes on both sides. It's exactly like you said. Calling one side entitled cancer but ignoring the obvious larping MRA's calling everyone radfems and desperately wanting those topics to be gone as a whole for dishonest reasons is not the way to solve it.
What personally bothered me the most is
>Despite of however the polls turn out I have a pretty good hunch that the constant troon accusations against everyone won't stop.>I know not all gc and pp anons are like this, and things have appeared fine for now, despite of the continued comments about how /ot/ anons are all troons.If the biggest issue is the troon accusations, just make them a bannable offense if they aren't explained with actual concerns and made just to shitpost and be angry. Please don't take it to heart. Same goes for /ot/, I'm sure that counts as infighting. I hope she didn't just made /2X/ and the poll to "appease" those posters and is actually going to consider the info she gains from the poll..
No. 510917
File: 1578562723299.png (69.65 KB, 1260x1064, result.png)
>>510915exactly, this is literally how it always goes. pp or whatever posters are solely blamed for shit the other parties start, and we're also the only ones that get penalized. even when they're the ones that are saying "kill yourself" and similarly aggressive shit. the anon tinfoiling was anti-2X. why do they literally attribute all of these things to us when it's literally the opposing side??? i didn't even see a "tranny team" accusation in the meta thread recently. it's dumb accusation, and i am tired of it, but it wasn't happening? almost everything 2X anons were blamed for was shit the other parties were doing.
>>510916i dont get it. by all appearances so far, we aren't even close to the minority, unless the team really counts the momokun spergs and onisiontards as the real userbase. i don't understand why they're so unwilling to believe the progression has pretty obviously been organic. it's literally visible if you read threads from 2-3 years ago.
No. 510919
>>510917Looking at the thread and checking the results just confirms what I've always thought: The people constantly sperging about "radfems" and demanding all discussion of female politics be removed are a loud, aggressive minority. I don't know why they don't seem to ever get banned, but they are not as numerous as the /meta/ thread infights and complaining would imply.
The majority of farmers aren't really bothered about /2X/, GC or PP. Whoever has been throwing tantrums and calling people femcels that should kill themselves certainly doesn't speak for the userbase.
I can understand why the admin would be exasperated with the infighting and tinfoiling, but at the same time, we all know how quickly shit would get redtexted and/or deleted if half of the shit the "anti-GC/PP" anon(s) said were said by pro-GC/PP anons. When the double standards are this blatant, it's no wonder some people are tinfoiling.
No. 510920
>>510894Thank you for your thoughtfull and constructive advice. I will think about what you said.
>>510898you're right. I'm just so angry.
No. 510921
>>510908I think 2X was a great idea and honestly I'm really pissed that the meta anons couldn't just take it for what it is and had to keep going back to fight with the libfems and repeat the troon thing when admin already made it
clear troon speculation isn't tolerated. This board and our ability to post on this site about female politics at all are on shaky ground and it seemed like 2X was a great solution. Now it and the OT threads will probably cause people wouldn't stop infighting in meta. It really sucks because we're going to lose all our threads just cause of a few people who couldn't calm the fuck down.
No. 510922
>>510908Admin was near enough spot on. I have nothing against PP or GC, I browse the threads myself. The problem is that there seems to be a small number of posters that are taking it too far. It's these people that she's addressing, not PP/GC anons in general. The problem being caused in /ot/ is that these posters are leaking into the rest of the board and it's creating a hostile atmosphere. I've seen it and had it happen to me. If an anon mentions something that these posters disagree with, the anon will get accused of being either a larping male or a troon. It's obnoxious and derails threads.
This also isn't the first time that the meta thread has turned into infighting and tinfoiling. As soon as the existence of the pink pill thread is brought up there's always at least one poster that goes on a tirade accusing the staff of being trannies. It's as though these certain posters can't comprehend that not everyone agrees with them and doesn't want it shoved down their throats in unrelated threads.
Why I think admin is correct in her assessment is that unlike ordinary farmers, admin and farmhands can see exactly what someone is posting and where. Unless admin has changed it, LC uses a modified version of tinyboard. Anyone that's been around image boards should know how mod.php works. This is how the current and previous admins have been able to reveal the post histories of self posting cows. Everything posted under the same IP can be linked across all boards.
No. 510924
>>510911Previous admin was a man??? W-what???
Also, people getting mad at anons tinfoiling about scrotes or trannies are autismo. This is lolcow, an imageboard, it's obvious sometimes anons are going to be aggressive and shit on you. I've been called out before too (especially in vent and unpopular opinion threads) and got angry because of it, but eventually forgot about it. Are we 2 year old babies or what? Just move on, you're anonymous, you shouldn't get so worked up. Novody gives a shit.
No. 510925
>>510908I'm disappointed with the GC/PP anons who kept infighting in the /meta/ thread, but the opposite side was really aggressive ("Kill yourself", "Dumb cunt" etc.) and kept on instigating fights and I don't know how the staff couldn't see it. To me it looks like there's a slight bias against GC/PP anons, even though the polls are clearly favoring us.
But I'm grateful that admin created this board, hopefully people will behave and ignore bait. Can't condemn 2X anons if we ignore bait and refuse to fight. If you see anti-GC/PP trying to poke you, just ignore and report.
>>510924We had a male admin years ago, he's not here anymore.
No. 510926
>>510910i have seen this before too, but not just with white men.
spoiler for being racebaity. tbf it is mainly white and some asian american men ive seen doing it online. ive only heard this bullshit irl from one white guy and i cut him off immediately lolthese men just see all women as their property.
No. 510928
>>510908admin is a mess that hasn't been able to form her own opinion on this issue and instead is just punching out. It's honestly fucking pathetic. Just have the boards you want, remove what you don't. She's concerned about the site dying if she gets rid of 2X, but she hates it for keeping her site relevant.
This site is known for being a bitchy place to laugh at idiots. 2X gave it a purpose outside that and admin latched onto it, started talking about expanding the site more and into different topics. She's mad as shit the userbase don't want that.
I told the admin 3 months ago lolcow was being spammed on chans and they were raiding, posting screenshots etc. I sent her links. She ignored it. She deserves everything she gets at this point.
No. 510930
>>510813Girl same. Seems like for a while every other post there was either "I want to fuck my older married boss/coworker" or "I want to cheat on my boyfriend". Pretty sure it's leaping scrotes trying to make women look bad. And then when someone was complaining that people would flip out if something positive about men was said (in tbe
man hate thread) it was the last straw for me.
No. 510931
>>510928>She's mad as shit the userbase don't want that.But if we go by the survey results, they clearly do.
It's looking more and more like she's trying to appease a minority of newfags who LARP as oldfags, maybe because some of the farmhands agree with those people (and she stated that many of the farmhands are her actual friends, so).
No. 510932
File: 1578596986652.png (21.06 KB, 1261x187, incredible.PNG)
>>510921while, again, i appreciate her work, don't take admin's word for it, she's biased and is placing blame on the wrong party wrt the meta thread. no one in meta was tinfoiling about troons. an anti 2X anon derailed and was tinfoiling about pizzagate and 8chan, and how 2X might become like that. there was no tinfoiling from pp/gc posters.
>>510922>If an anon mentions something that these posters disagree with, the anon will get accused of being either a larping male or a troon. It's obnoxious and derails threads.i think the troon accusations are unlikely and get annoying, but this isn't a forum. we have no information about posters. anons being scrotes IS plenty possible. anons are hypervigilant because we know the board has been attacked and scrotes purposefully disguise themselves to influence our opinions (like pic related who was trying his best to keep his cover and and was later outed by farmhands as a poltard). i've been banned for "feeding the troll" in the manhate thread by talking about history, that wasn't even laced with racebait or anything. how was i to know he was male? they expect us to KNOW anons are or aren't men despite the fact that we know men raid here. we know what they did to crystal.cafe and anons don't want it to happen. i get that. while i think the troon accusations are out of hand and the troon mod thing is so annoying, i think it's plenty reasonable for anons to suspect anons may be men. they're going in blind here. i think it's unreasonable to expect anons to not be hypervigilant about posters when we know the site has been targeted since the beginning. they almost act like we have the same information as them about posters. we don't, and we can't read minds. and pp/2X anons weren't tinfoiling about trannies in the meta thread. they have in the past, but sincerely, they didn't this time. that's why her reaction is so bizarre.
>>510931this this this. the userbase DOES want it to expand. almost 65% iirc believe the site should expand beyond drama and almost 69% want to keep 2X. idk if farmhands are her online or irl friends, but a lot of them are very biased and seem like they can't tolerate online opinions tbh. admin is more tolerant than the farmhands, even. the anti-pp/gc newfags speaking for oldfags are incredibly obnoxious and it plainly seems that the derision is owed to the fact that the team shares different political beliefs.
No. 510933
>>510931She wanted to introduce trips and stuff though, which is such a ridiculous suggestion for a board with this kind of culture I can't even wrap my head around it. It's like she's looking at Kiwifarms for inspiration or something.
Interesting about farmhands being irl friends. Makes more sense. If they want a personal website for their group that follows their beliefs then make one. Obviously the userbase doesn't agree with them. I mean she got rid of the farmhand that were sperging replying to men in bans, but she let that one autistic farmhand run around the GC thread on /ot/ sperging about how much they hated us, then they went straight to meta and CONTINUED it. And then she's SURPRISED people think there's a tranny farmhand when they can't even stay out of the GC threads?
>>510932yes to no one tinfoiling about troons. I read that thread and no one said shit about it. And honestly she's kicked up such a fuss if I wanted 2X gone why WOULDN'T I go to meta right now and spam shit about tranny farmhands? She's saying "STOP DOING THIS ANONYMOUS GROUP OF PEOPLE" and REALLY doesn't see how that attitude is not going to work? She's a joke.
Also if the farmhands had actually been banning males etc for hijacking people wouldn't tinfoil so hard about every poster being male. Instead they stay banning for the dumbest shit.
No. 510938
>>510908Honestly if I was the admin and had to deal with constant newfag reddit/tumblr radfem migrates having a spergout and tranny janny accusations despite giving us a fucking board to thrive in, I'd probably blow up like this too. I have no idea why anons started reeing and picking up a fight in the /meta/ thread because I was ecstatic to see 2X opened. The stupid fucks who constantly start with the "admin is siding with the troons" bullshit need to lay off, I was with them back when GC thread got "mysteriously" autosaged and then fused to the PP/Radfem thread but now it's just enraging. The current admin has been the most competent one we've had so far and I say this as someone who has been frequenting LC for over 5 years and REALLY don't want to lose the only place online where I can anonymously complain about men and trannies with other women.
I wouldn't have a problem with radfem anons because I identify as one myself, but some of the people on this site seem to get a kick out of attacking other women over semantics and petty nitpicking just like the worst libfems. I'm guessing they're underage recent libfem to radfem converts who can't contain their anger or mouth diarrhea but it's still threatening the space we have to share with them. Obviously there are undercover men and troons doing their best to get rid of the evil terves but some of these speds need to calm themselves the fuck down and learn to discuss things over without screeching and trashing around.
No. 510940
File: 1578601634318.png (60.32 KB, 1212x571, tone.PNG)
>>510938sorry, but anon, did you even read the meta thread? pro pp/gc anons were not picking fights. why is this continually being repeated? this is how the tone went: anons would say why they liked 2X, and anti-pp anons would stomp in and angrily demand whatever they wanted, call names, etc. i really can't stand the wrong parties being blamed and punished. there have also been a few anons stomping into /meta/ even before the 2X thing, like a month ago, just demanding /ot/ be completely nuked.
what new radblr migrates? there are like, none, and radblr anons have openly been here for like 3 years. there has been an influx of /r/gendercritical users and gender crit twitter users but those are not the same. gendercritical users are the ones that sperg the most about "tranny jannies" etc. there are so many more annoying and malicious posters than what she chooses to get this angry about, honestly. that's what i find odd. i really think her actions are strange. like merging the radfem thread and blaming it (when it was literally dead) for causing problems? no one posted in it. none.
No. 510941
>>510885It's so funny how when you lurk other sites and see how men men get internally angry because they failed their college courses b/c of their coomer brain and the women pass with flying colors. They always cope and say, "I just didn't feel like trying", "they probably asked for favors from the teacher", etc.
They can't deal when they see a woman that's smarter than them. Then they EXPLODE if the woman is POC kek
No. 510942
>>510889If you are afraid of speaking up, I would say, stay back and just gather evidence, whether text/phonecalls/ footage/ statements, anything. That way went someone rings the alarm you go the juice.
Don't turn a blind eye. But find allies and be smart.
No. 510943
>>510897This is literally /gif/
Thank you.
No. 510948
>>510932Admin mentionned that the whole farmhand team are her friends and several are irl friends. That in itslef, is a problem imo. Of course admin is gonna have her own opinions and is gonna be biased in a certain way, thats normal, she's a human being. But the thing is, as humans, we tend to be friends with people who share similar opinions to ours so having a whole team that moderates an imageboard as big as LC is iffy. There's no nuance. There's no seeing that a farmhand did something wrong and revoking their mod privileges without it creating personal drama in her life.
I did like
a lot of admin's decisions concerning LC but she does seem very easily offended at attacks directed at the team which she shouldnt be because…it's an imageboard. And in the same breath her other biggest offence is "oh my god, we have to keep the OG imageboard LC feel", but lmao, if she was here 6 years ago, everyone was so much meaner to everyone and no one was getting offended at it.
It's also wild to me because I'm in the LC discord and regarding GC/PP, farmers seem to either be very pro GC/PP (either participating in the thread or not) or they just don't care. I've never seen anyone on the server REEEing about it like the couple of posters in /meta/ that claim that
we are the vocal minority.
No. 510951
File: 1578615966703.png (70.8 KB, 894x300, Screenshot_20200110-112047~3.p…)
Radfems are middle aged tradthots confirmed. I thank God every day that the threads are split again.
No. 510954
>>510951This unsaged post that is typed suspiciously similar to the posts in the GC thread that was trying to start fights earlier is a great example of the type of person coming here to shit stir and cause internal issues because thy want to shut down all female discourse.
Be gone.
No. 510958
>>510938I agree tbh. I don't blame admin for getting pissed off at idiots who can't stop sperging for five seconds and realize what a gift we have here. Seeing autismal reeeing about how everyone has to be a troon because they disagree was honestly pretty shameful. It also gives grounds for deciding to nuke /2X/ and the /ot/ threads if that's what people think our sphere of the userbase consist of.
I just want a space to talk about this shit anonymously online. I like how the site culture makes everyone much more blunt but also comfortable in talking in depth about things. lolcow has a very specific kind of user and it's fun to get a less 'serious' point of view.
I'm thankful admin gave us this space and am glad that she's okay with putting aside her own views to do it. It's not a fun thing to deal with and having anons slapfighting is dumb.
No. 510960
>>510954lol what? it's pretty clear a lot of them are married mothers who never shut up about their nigels and precious sons who are gc/radfem because they don't like troons.
it was especially rampant in the previous hellmerged thread where someone was telling women to stay home and reproduce because that's how you make more feminists.
also who the fuck cares about sage on an unlisted board lol
No. 510962
>>510958>Seeing autismal reeeing about how everyone has to be a troon because they disagree was honestly pretty shameful. Where did you see that, because it literally did not happen? It has happened it the past, but it didn't recently, like, at all.
> don't blame admin for getting pissed off at idiots ho can't stop sperging for five seconds and realize what a gift we have here. Uh, they did. The thread was filled with gc/pp anons talking about how much they like the idea of 2X. The only sperging was coming from the other side. Read the thread instead of reflexively licking admin's ass. She's riling herself up despite none of those claims happening, because she wants a reason to be angry at pp/gc, honestly. It doesn't give her a legitimate reason to nuke anything, because nothing she claimed happening was even happening, and it wasn't coming from pp/gcers.
No. 510963
>>510939Why not try making an image board but having it contained? Not great examples but Lainchan and Uboachan are pretty slow but active and has boards and threads with good discussion going on and from what I've seen not much fun-posting or just general unsightly nonsense.
The thing is too that LC is very 'popular' with the wrong people and if you make a new image board it would have to be on a 'need to know' basis of sorts so not just anyone can come in a derail, if it's posted in thread maybe they could find the site in a search engine maybe not, it all depends. Or just take a look at other slower image boards to get an idea or you can do what Teachan does and have the site active every 7/14 hours with one board for discussion.
Another thing might be pro-boards if you were interested in making a forum, I know a lot of farmers want to stay anon but if it's ever on the table you could make a forum and have it locked and invite only from the admin and users, also of course users would be responsible for whomever they invited to the site and would be issued warning/ban etc for unsightly behavior
No. 510964
File: 1578626679628.jpg (140.36 KB, 1242x1289, ENte5QLU4AAgT09.jpg)
>>510897The American-Iranian stuff is producing gems like these.
No. 510969
>>510964>>510965>muh white saviorIn reality it's more like they'd kidnap and rape those women after bombing their villages and killing their entire family
*Tell me more about how men invade other countries to protect their families and shit though. Lol. I love to hear the justifications.
No. 510970
>>510965>>510964What a creepy gross fuck. So sick of crusty old men airing out their slave fantasies only to backtrack and say it's "satire" Then continue to talk on it more since it's never satire.
Just look him up and he has two kids too. Divorced and he bitterly said that a woman would only marry him for money. So he fell down the manosphere hole to justify his hatred of women like every red piller. And he frequently retweets Richard Cooper. A scrote thats a single dad but advocates against single moms dating. Coopers also against traditionalism and having kids (it's more like he hates women having kids and thinks it's pathetic how it's womens only job)
No. 510972
>>510971tbf tho, and i'm not saying admin does a bad job or anything, she just is obviously biased and so is her team, but hotwheels and moot were dealing with huge, huge userbases full of legit monsters and actual, serious, literally lethal assholes. lolcow has literally the most tame userbase you can have for an imageboard.
like… you cannot be blessed with a better core userbase than this tbh. to go on an angry tirade over some anons in the past suggesting you might have a tranny friend modding, or some anons occasionally suggesting other anons are troons… idk how to say it in a nicer way but that admin needs to get some perspective. i really do appreciate what she does and her investing her time and resources, but taking on the role of admin on an imageboard can go so, so, soooo sour and honestly can be risky. a few anons suggesting people might be troons on occasion is literally the smallest issue an admin can face with their userbase, especially on an imageboard, where the absolute worst assholes tend to congregate.
No. 510978
File: 1578655674189.png (96.05 KB, 902x1332, iuhih.png)
>>510974>>510973This. For anyone who needs a reminder: Check out the survey results. No matter how much dumb shit you see in the /meta/ thread attacking "the radfems", the numbers don't lie.
Don't bother arguing when you see inflammatory posts. It's probably the same angry people circling the thread to start fights and bait people every time.
Just two more days. Considering we can all see the results for ourselves, I fully trust that the admin will follow her word and go with what the userbase's votes reflect, fair and square. No more infighting, just let this thing run its course. About the only thing the opposition can do at this point is get pissy and make the incredibly weak argument that "real farmers" (who they somehow telepathically know and can reliably speak for) would never, ever vote on a survey for the site's fate, so the whole thing should be ignored.
About the only part I'm iffy about is the "board scheme" poll, but that's only one metric out of three. Plus, it's already been noted that /2X/ was added as an option in that particular poll later than all the other boards for some reason (explaining the lower vote count), so I doubt it'll be used to invalidate everything.
No. 510982
>>510971No anon, this isn't a male vs. female thing. There have been plenty of imageboards run by women where the admin didn't throw shitfits like this. It's against imageboard culture.
When you make post like admin does you invite further abuse. Because now everyone knows it's getting to you. You have to be able to rise above the bullshit, especially if the bullshit is as minimal as "someone is calling my friend a tranny on an anonymous board designed for shit talking".
Like someone else said, her posts are cow level.
>>510974This is what is driving me insane. It's so obvious it's a few posters new to the board who don't even know how to blend in. Admin must see this and is choosing to ignore it. A few people have been all over 2X for the last few days going into GC/PP threads and making posts about how the other group is shit. They never sage their posts. Ignore them.
No. 510983
>>510981Nowhere did admin say trips and the survey doesn't say anything about trips either. Do you know how imageboards work?
>>510978Thanks anon
No. 510986
>>510967Can you just shut the fuck up. People like you make it worse for us. I swear.
>>510963Read the fucking thread. The problem is that instead of IGNORING the spergs, people here take the BAIT. They take the bait so hard they can't see that that's what antis want you to do to see you argue over and over to get the staff annoyed. Who keeps falling for it ffs. LET THEM SPERG. IGNORE THEM. DO NOT INFIGHT WITH THEM.I commented in meta. Asked admin a question. Ignored the sperg calling me a retard for having
valid concerns about emails and voting. Admin/farmhand answered my question, and I moved on.
Can you all just think. FFs.
No. 510993
>>510992They're degenerates from Discord, all anonymous. I know some of them live fairly normal lives with jobs and relationships.
I guess I could report the server but I don't know if it'd be banned because all posts are from instagram and twitter so no nudity.
No. 510995
>>510990I'm doing my best staying alert and talking to other people in the area. People are aware and afraid.
Anyone know how effective self-defence sprays are?
No. 510998
>>510994They never read sources. I link them random shit all the time that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about lol. I dated a guy once and he hated how much I knew about the world wars (which isn't THAT much tbh) because he was in the army and thought that made him instantly knowledgeable on all wars (i know, I was young). He told me once the Russians were Nazis, and when I said they weren't he asked for a source. He told me American's had never lost a war, and again asked me to source it.
One day I snapped and I realized he was threatened by me. That's literally all it was. I made him look fucking stupid because he expected women to just take him at his word. He also expect admiration purely because he had been in the army. Dumped his ass and he's an alcoholic again now.
The only source I keep around for scrotes is this one for when they claim women get lighter sentences constantly and try the pussy pass shit. I just link this and ask them if this is penis pass.
https://kval.com/news/local/oregon-man-sentenced-to-14-months-for-raping-3-teens No. 511002
>>510999It's the hardest because it's the one thing I could never risk in a relationship. How could I ever get married or, god forbid, have kids knowing he might be a pedo?
Everything you said is true, but I'd add that men take every sexual opportunity they can get. So even a guy who prefers developed women will fuck a kid if it's socially acceptable in that particular culture. When desperate enough they will lower their standards to ugly women, fat women, animals, inanimate objects and each other, why would children be any different?
No. 511004
>>511003Your logic makes no sense. If, by some chance, all men DID want to fuck 5 year olds, that still wouldn't 'normalize' jack shit. They would still be sick, perverted degenerates and there would be no defense of it even if they all felt the exact same way. Something being common or universal doesn't suddenly make it morally acceptable. You're the one giving them an out by saying it's only bad if it's abnormal.
I mean, I don't think all men WANT to fuck 5 year olds. I think more would be willing to than we like to imagine. I think the vast majority of men want to fuck 13 year olds, and there is ample proof of this throughout history. That isn't me normalizing pedophilia, that's saying that the majority of men are pedo garbage we should refrain from trusting.
No. 511005
>>511004>Something being common or universal doesn't suddenly make it morally acceptable. I'm afraid it doesn't work that way. If you claim that most men want to have sex with 12 year old kids, it makes those pedos who want to do it feel fine with their desires. "Oh, if everyone wants that, then it's fine if I want that too! It's normal!"
I agree that we should be cautious of men tho.
No. 511007
>>511005I understand what you're saying, maybe it's true that men will feel more comfortable being pedos if it's commonly known that they are all pedos. But you can't just NAMALT in the hopes that pedos will feel isolated and therefore guilty for their perversions, first reason being that it's a total lie - most men are like this. We can't just deny reality on the off chance it might manipulate men into being better.
Secondly, men are always confident that they are right in all things and don't give a single fuck if a woman tells him it's bad or wrong. They ALREADY feel perfectly entitled to fuck 12 year olds and resent the laws that prevent them from doing so without repercussions. They bitch constantly that feminism is holding them back from their god given right to fuck children. Even if we never made blanket generalizations about them being pedos, they would meet likeminded men online and form communities that confirm they are all pedos anyway.
Third, and imo the most important reason, is that it gives women a false sense of security if we think pedos are just a small portion of particularly creepy men. The average, normal or even attractive pedos out there will never be treated with any suspicion if we keep lying to ourselves that pedos are rare. Most normie women don't understand just how common it is. It takes a lot of time getting pink pilled, reading about history and news, lurking male communities etc, and going through a tough mental process to accept and understand, and it doesn't help to dismiss pedos as a fringe element and lower our guards around men.
No. 511009
>>511007Sorry if this isn't the place for discussion like this, but
>most men are like thisIs there any proof of that? Yes, men used to marry 13 yos in the past, but in the vast majority of cases those men were also teenagers. Marriages with significant age gaps only happened between nobility for political causes. The only notable exception I can think of is Ancient Greece. Throughout history the most ideal female body type was a body of average, adult female.
I get that men can find young teenagers with exceptionally developed bodies attractive, but an average 12 or 13 yo girl looks more like a little boy than a little woman.
>Secondly, men are always confident that they are right in all things and don't give a single fuck if a woman tells him it's bad or wrongI've noticed that as well lol. You can't get through to males like that with logic and ethics. The only thing that works is peer pressure. If they understand that most men don't find the same thing attractive, they will be less confident in their preverted paraphilia.
As for your final point, I also think pedophilic behaviour or awful practices (like child brides) should be given more attention to. Women should be aware that lots of pedophilic men exist, imo we should more often show faces and identities of predators. I don't see how claiming that "all men are pedos" will help the case more than giving more opportunities for
victims to speak out.
No. 511012
>>511009NTA, but aside from the Greeks, I've noticed multiple cultures seem to have/had some aspect that involves grown men "tutoring" young boys and having sex with them.
The Bacha bazi thing going on in Afghanistan comes to mind. Even the Japanese had the "shudo" practice. I'm pretty sure I've heard of Buddhist monks sexually abusing young boys in their monasteries before, too. There's definitely other examples, but I don't really feel like dragging them up.
Men are just sick.
I think part of it is that boys are "more available" than little girls and women (who are either kept far away from males, or marked as another man's commodity, aka not fair game). Wherever patriarchy fully prevails, there's always some sort of window. Pedophilia being socially unacceptable almost seems recent, sadly enough.
No. 511014
>>511012Oh, I wasn't referring to how they groomed young boys. The average girl was 14 when she got married, while men were getting married at 30 on average in Ancient Greece. In other cultures and periods of history most people got married to partners who were their age.
But you've brought up an interesting topic. It seems like male sexuality is inherently tied to need for dominance/conquering taboo. Recently I've been reading about how popular among men in middle ages was the idea of romance/being tied to wife (often in her 30s) of their lord because that was the "ultimate taboo". Hopefully other anons who know more about history can contribute.
No. 511015
>>511009>Throughout history the most ideal female body type was a body of average, adult female. Nobody ever said men have to hold up children as the ideal body. Men fuck women they consider substandard all the time. If they get the opportunity to fuck a kid, they will, it's that simple. They might not consider that child to be the most sexually appealing thing in the world, but it's a hole and therefore a goal.
Men are sexual opportunists and unfortunately that includes kids who 'look more like a little boy than a little woman'.
No. 511017
File: 1578824146474.png (802.31 KB, 974x525, 1570415151716.png)
>>511016>They say underage teen girls love older men and boys their age can't handle them.Preety much this
No. 511020
>>511018This is every woman in a relationship that I know, even if they don't outwardly complain about it. I don't know any woman in my family who gets housework help from their husband. It's always the woman's job to clean and manage the house. Most women seem to be conditioned to thinking their relationship is balanced because their SO put up a shelf or fixed a pipe 6 months ago, and "he doesn't know how to do housework anyway." If the men do clean anything, they need to have the woman remind them several times, then they attempt a halfassed job so the woman takes over anyway.
Growing up, I used to hear the men in my family call certain women "gold diggers" and "leeches" for wanting to be financially supported, and I always thought how shitty those women were. I always wanted an equal relationship, of course. Now I see those supposedly equal relationships just mean you work full time and still do 100% of the housework, cooking, planning, and managing for 2 people, plus any kids you might have. Depressing.
No. 511022
>>511018I know you're probably not looking for advice anon, and regardless I think it's too late for what I was thinking when I was reading your story:
>Don't set the precedent.What I mean is stop taking on the mental load, the management, and execution of all chores. You make your labor a routine, and men will start to expect you to do things while they laze by. There's no consequences, so they have no motive to not refuse you.
I used to do that too. Thinking shit would never get done if I wasn't the one moving forward. When I dropped the rope and stopped being an automated maid, turns out men can do more work than women think. I don't pick up and do shit automatically anymore, I keep score, and there's a consequence to being a useless slob in my life…the door.
If your man is already a slob and content to live in squalor though, setting the bar early on probably won't accomplish much. And sad to say, but once men get used to "how things are" in a relationship, they get awful irate and resentful at you for trying to change the status quo. After all men benefit greatly from a woman's emotional and domestic labor. Best believe men who have had it easy on the back of your labor are going to be affronted by the suggestion that things not be that way anymore. A man who values and provides for you would respect you more and contribute his fair share to your home. Be strong anon, I hope it gets better for you.
No. 511023
File: 1578905127968.png (122.31 KB, 991x876, 1578897812334.png)
Repost from another thread, thought it belongs here.
No. 511027
>>511003This isn't how normalization works.
>>511018Anon please stop this. He won't change. You're moving his stuff and he won't help? Well, you don't know where it goes so trash it. Paint the room a color he hates. Better yet, kick him out. But right now all you're doing is telling him it's ok to act like this and then Mothering him. Come on. Why would he change when the worst you'll do is complain and do it anyway.
Think of it this way, if a dog shit on your carpet would you just accept it? No, you change the dogs behavior by teaching it it's positive to shit outside and it will get positive reinforcement. If you're serious about saying with this moid get a pack of jerky and start throwing it at his face when he does something positive, spray him with the hose when he fucks up.
No. 511028
File: 1578952810643.png (248.83 KB, 1559x771, redtext.png)
>>511023lol it got redtexted
mods looking more hostile to us everyday
No. 511030
>>511029That just sounds like a mixture of condescension, mockery and fake "I'm just like you"-ing. In the last case, they want to lull you into a false sense of security and make you think you have some sort of control over them, to the point of altering their vocabulary.
When it's in quotes, it's probably mockery, especially if they turn it against you to belittle you.
No. 511031
>>511023Who the fuck is that? How is this interesting for us to see?
You guys have this weird obsession with deranged fetish. Like you actually enjoy reading these shit.
No. 511033
I was gonna post here about how I got burned not too long ago by a low value scrote, and how something he said during his fake apology after treating me unfairly has been bothering me.
Before that, I enabled this cretin and rewarded him with sex which happened way too early. He didn't even earn me, not that he deserved me, but I gave it to him like my time and intimacy are charity. I was typing out all the details I was about to post leading up to that. All I could think the entire time is how fucking red these flags were. I fell for superficial charm and dubious talent in this frumpy guy who had no reason to be as full of himself as he is.
I'm pissed off that while I enjoy my own company and can handle periods of being alone, that I still crave meaningful intimacy with a male human. How every time I make myself vulnerable and am honest in my intentions, I get punched in the figurative tit by these guys anyway. I'm still too accommodating and project a need to give men chances because I hope some valuable guy will give me one. I'm a sucker for benefit of the doubt, which is the only thing I can't entirely blame myself for as even society thinks women are paranoid and hysterical if it feels we're too critical when a man mistreats us. AND to top it off, I even "date down" because I hopelessly believe this is how I'll find a man not so shallow and vapid and wouldn't take me for granted. Surprise! Turns out even unattractive, socially awkward, undereducated, and fat men think they're just as entitled to a roster of bangmaids and models that they can string along for years the same as "Chads."
It's bullshit.
No. 511035
>>511034They're too busy being laid and acosted by actual attractive women to whine about women lol.
It's always the lowest scrotes who've gotta neg women above their league to knock their self esteem down in order to get in their pants. They're hypocrites. They screech for high value women to give them chances despite being dogshit. It's always some obese dude with a "no fat chicks" shirt. It's always some ugly dude bitching about makeup being deceptive. It's always some dude who barely graduated high school getting pissed off that women are more academically accomplished.
It's not that these males couldn't get their looksmatch and equal re: A similarly homely woman who doesn't take much care of her personal hygiene, attire, nor appearance. But noooo, they don't want
those women because they want the stroke of ego they'd get from dating a hot chick! And hey they don't have to work on themselves or put in effort, they just deserve to fuck her on the basis that they possess crusty dick and sweaty balls. It makes me so mad.
No. 511037
File: 1578975690191.png (158.74 KB, 1243x506, e.PNG)
>>510978>Considering we can all see the results for ourselves, I fully trust that the admin will follow her word and go with what the userbase's votes reflect, fair and square. welp, check what admin decided to do. despite it being against what the userbase voted, she invalidated it and said she's abandoning 2X and banning pinkpill related topics from /ot/ and for anons to leave.
No. 511040
>>511037lmao imagine being THIS unapologetically biased and butthurt. She's not even trying to hide how emotionally invested she is in this shit, can't even take a minor L and let an unlisted containment board exist… Admin must have some nigels she desperately wants to protect to be this offended by women daring to discuss their grievances with men, or she just can't handle the fact that the majority do not agree with her wild overexaggerations of the problems with a radfem presence on the board.
Absolutely pathetic tbh
No. 511041
File: 1578977431346.jpg (Spoiler Image,206.8 KB, 900x481, 4d-chess.jpg)
>>511037>be admin>know that suddenly banning discussions of men and gender crit on ot would look bad >come up with brilliant scheme >create 'containment' board that successfully bans those discussions off ot>do not publicize the containment board due to speculations scrotes would invade, "four your own good">next, create poorly worded poll as to whether containment board is to be kept or binned >making things look all democracy-like >even after poll is collected and the winning half is in favor of keep, reason that it means there's not enough interest despite it being hidden>successfully rid site of all pinkpill and gendercrit discussion, without the appearance of any straightforward manipulation Ladies, it was a privilege to have bitched about men with you all. Best of luck.
No. 511043
>>511037I saw that, too. I was thinking the verdict would be to ban PP/GC threads, but let /2X/ remain, albeit unlisted and with increased lockdowns on derailing in /ot/ just to keep everyone happy. "Obvious voting duplicates" where?
It's disappointing, but what can we do? Maybe the next admin will be better.
In the meantime, is there anyone here with know-how on building an imageboard? No way I'm adding CC or Reddit to sites I post on in 2020. I saw someone mention Tinyboard as a tool, maybe someone could utilize it.
No. 511050
>>511046she's making herself look like a twit that will go down in lc history as an exceptionally irrational and thin-skinned admin. she's not doing the public perception of her intelligence any favors by trying to justify her prejudice with easily refuted nonsense.
she's self-owning herself by essentially trying to make herself look like a massive dumbass that can't think critically, publicly, all because she doesn't want to just admit she's biased as fuck.
sense would dictate maybe establishing another poll if you suspect it had been compromised? or maybe not making dumbass assumptions that make no sense and don't fit what you're claiming? there are ways for her to actually weed out newfags, but this ain't it and it's not proof of anything except that she's untrustworthy and lacks integrity.
No. 511051
>>511046>It's kinda lulzy that it was a trick question or whatever in a quick survey used.The question is made worse knowing she put it there to try to undermine the voter's credibility.
>WHAT, YOU DIDNT CARE ABOUT SPECIFIC OUTINGS YOU MUST NOT CARE ABOUT THE WEBSITE AT ALLMakes zero sense. If she doesn't care about an anon's vote, then she should just ditch the song and dance about this having been a fair poll. She was skewing it from the start.
No. 511054
>>511052>>511052>It made it sound like she is considering PP posters as invaders on the site or something.she does. she assumes they all come from reddit, or at least uses that excuse despite there having been a sizable gc and misandristic pop here many many years before, the ONLY difference is that the non-drama boards weren't anywhere near as active as they are now. everyone that agrees with her is the "real userbase" while everyone that disagrees isn't real and can easily be disregarded with patently stupid and transparent excuses.
i didn't trust her even before she made it THIS obvious because she repeatedly would be as hyperbolic as possible when assigning blame to pp/gc and downplaying any culpability that was rightfully owed to anti-pp/gcers. funny though, even with all the gc/pp anons that came into this thread and the meta thread to thoroughly tongue her ass and fluff her up with in-depth compliments and praise, it still wasn't enough to stop her from dramatically chimping out with this wack-ass decision.
No. 511055
>>511054The same users she hates have been her before she became admin. Pretty sad…
I LOVE how racebait doesn't drive staff up the wall but this does. Of all things.
No. 511063
>>511037She has proven to have literally zero integrity and no one on LC will trust her after this move, whatever the next big decisions will be.
Very bad idea to have your irl friends be the entire modteam, too. I had a feeling that there was a heavy bias against GC/PP anons, but I didn't expect her to go as far as to go against the poll results when she said she would move accordingly to them, just because. Admin and staff are supposed to be impartial, the current ones are the most biased we've ever had.
I've already looked at how the usual 2-3 anti-GC/PP anons who are literally camping in the /meta/ thread have been baiting 2X anons into infights and attacking them as usual, no redtexts under their posts while the 2X anons got redtexted. Absolutely embarrassing.
I guess LC is gonna become a PULL/CC clone now.
No. 511064
>>511037hahah i KNEW she'd do this.
>>511040She said people calling her and her friends trannys on an anonymous imageboard was impacting her real life which is the funnier shit than most cows have put out in months.
>>511051It's ridiculous because plenty of people browse a few cows but post mainly on /ot/ and /g/. But that's reason enough to make their votes not count? People not super invested in cows were just going to pick the most popular, which was chris chan. Admin was just looking for an excuse. If it wasn't this, it would be something else.
>>511063it's honestly weird as shit to run a site like this with your rl friend group. I can't even imagine what they're like irl.
No. 511066
>>511064>She said people calling her and her friends trannys on an anonymous imageboard was impacting her real life which is the funnier shit than most cows have put out in months.I've been incorrectly tinfoiled as a tranny before, but my reaction isn't to get assblasted. At the end of the day I'm a woman and idgaf if some rando thinks a single post on the internet changes my chromosomes. Sometimes anons bark up the wrong tree so why should I give a fuck? It's funny at best, and annoying at worst.
If moderators like admin have ban powers and access to view post history to see if someone accuses often, then all the more reason why a baseless accusation shouldn't have upset her. I've seen this shit for years and I don't even bat an eye at it anymore.
Sisters, it don't add up.
No. 511068
>>511067Everytime I checked the /meta/ thread it was people sperging about pp/gc and telling users to kill themselves. The idea that it was GC users causing the issues is a fantasy.
As I said before, all anyone had to do that hated GG/PP was go to /meta/ and sperg about trannies. Which is exactly what happened. Admin fell for it because apparently she's new to imageboards or some shit because all of this is weird
No. 511070
>>511063>Very bad idea to have your irl friends be the entire modteam, too. Like
>>511065 said she said something about some of the mods but she did have applications up and I applied to be a farmhand a year ago rip
>>511066Anons in the migration thread said making a site is too much work to maintain idk if staff pays for the site or if there are donations maybe that's apart of it?
>>511067At least we still have pp I hope
No. 511072
File: 1579054969959.png (235.75 KB, 1080x721, Screenshot_20200115-031526~01.…)
anons has wizardchan been discussed before ? I've never seen it on lolcow but it's basically the image board of incels. It has been around for quite a while I think and it's still pretty active. It can be hilarious or very depressing but I'll never get over how they always blame their parents.
No. 511073
>>511072I lurked once and I think the basic idea of that board was to not be as
toxic as the incels on reddit. They're still cringe though.
No. 511075
File: 1579068783787.jpg (96.76 KB, 1356x1058, EN6rUn9X0AIou3o.jpg)
No. 511079
File: 1579081993402.jpg (91.8 KB, 766x960, 2938093.jpg)
I can't believe men are the same species as us.
No. 511080
>>511077kek
>>511079they are massively stupid but no offense you have to be a dumbfuck too to willingly want to have kids with a man. literally like seriously expecting a feral boar to raise and parent your child. having their kids, ever, is a bad move
>>511075the pictures were sickening and a bunch of those girls were 11 and 12. like it's obviously all rape and child rape specifically, but 11 and 12??? 14?? 'beautiful'??? that title literally reads like the onion satirizing neoliberal outlets. author is a creep for certain.
No. 511082
>>511075>teenage sex workersThis is exactly the pedophilic bullshit liberal "pro sex work!!!" types insisted would never, ever happen. These are
child prostitutes, fuck off and stop using euphemisms. Some of them aren't even close to being teenagers.
Can't wait for Buzzfeed's next gallery on "brave, stunning" 10 year old human trafficking
victims and child prostitutes from Thailand (who the photographer didn't save, and no one else will, because assuming there's anything wrong with any of this would be whorephobic). I hate this planet.
No. 511083
>>511075Of course a scrote wrote it.
>>511079Kek a priest once told me I'm a dyke because I WASN'T breastfed.
No. 511086
>>511079>>511080wrt having children/raising children with males, it doesn't make sense. the reason men are retarded and useless when it comes to children is because they weren't supposed to raise them.
(at the risk of sounding like some evo psych retard, I want to clarify that by saying women are better at raising children I don't mean that's all they're good for or that it's their calling. rather, women can raise children and work, men can only work).
anyway, my point is that expecting them to 'parent' or stick around after cumming is illogical. in practically all mammalian species the male fucks off after the mating process. they don't provide anything in terms of utility eg gestating, nursing, cleaning, cooking etc.
No. 511088
>>511086>implying women are capable of raising childrenlol
Nobody knows how to raise children. Maybe girls are better at it because they have been taught and encouraged to be babysitters. Boys are expected to play football or whatever, not nanny their toys. Males are capable of raising children, they just choose not to be involved, which is even more infuriating.
No. 511089
>>511085They argue because we have our romantic "fantasies" about how we'd like to be treated with kindness, consideration, and respect that it entitles them to their sexual "fantasies" of being depraved and reducing women as objects to be fucked.
Men are derivative. It's not comparable at all.
No. 511091
Why do so many middle aged women favor boys over girls?
Example the whole "girls mature faster than boys and therefore I can be stricter with the former and more reliant with the latter"-argument.
My sis tells my mom that the guys in her class are mean and she reacts by saying that they're mentally 2 years behind her and therefore in the middle of puberty. Bullshit! They've lived just as long as my sis, quit making excuses for them. Just because she looks and acts older doesn't mean that her mind should have to endure more.
I'm studying to be a teacher and yesterday we had training on how to give the birds and the bees talk.
>"even here on the countryside are so many trans children blah blah tolerance blah blah, just let them choose whether they want sexual education about male or female bodies"
So you just don't tell a young fakeboi what a period is…? Later she just quickly mentioned gay kids, acting as this is less common than trannies.
It's really crazy, I don't live in the US, we're basically in the middle of nowhere, yet you're telling me there are sooo many troon kids…?
>"even very young boys can get an erection at the most random times without even wanting that, so it's imporant to teach girls not to make fun of them for that!"
Not a single word about making it clear to boys that mocking girls who are on their period or asking "Are you on your period, hehe" is disgusting. No girl would ever be mean to a boy for an accident like that, other boys do that. Meanwhile boys are constantly cruel to girls about their periods and the discomfort they experience during those days at a very young age already.
I also hated how she gave some libfem talk about periods being nice despite you maybe experiencing cramps, that it's a sign that your body is healthy and could produce offspring. I'm pretty sure 10-year-old little girls give a fuck about that.
No. 511092
I just found out that my nigel listens to some of the most extremely violent, misogynistic music.
So, I’m currently in a relationship with a moid. He’s smart and progressive, as far as I know feminist-oriented, etc. Well, the other day I was snooping thorough his laptop seeing if he had hidden any porn. some background, he and I have shared musical interests in the past, so I also decide to snoop in his spotify account, mainly to see if he had anything I wanted to listen to, and most of the stuff seems pretty normal—hard rock, some classic rock, some indie—but then I come across a few things that I found really disturbing.
In particular there’s this band called Cannibal Corpse. They’re apparently a “death metal” band. All of their songs seem to be about horrific violence and torture, usually directed against women and usually involving extreme sexual violence. Here are a few examples of the kind of stuff I found on his spotify, if you can stomach it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDpl2VSEz2Y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQ9d0G6M2EU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNhN6lT-y5U Let me also say that I’m a survivor of sexual abuse, and while I’m in a great place now, I do still get
triggered sometimes by more explicit images of sexual violence. So the fact that my boyfriend apparently listens to this is really upsetting. don't know how to confront him about this cause he doesn’t actually play this around the house, or make me listen to it. I only found it because I was snooping through his spotify without his knowledge
No. 511093
>>511092I had no idea grown men listened to Cannibal Corpse, I thought that was a band only edgy high school boys cared about. Shit taste tbh.
It's hard to say anon. It could be a yellow flag, but all that matters is how he treats you on the day to day. There have been men who don't listen to misogynistic music who have still turned out to be shitheads.
I will say this: Beware of men who claim to be feminist. Often times they only admire aspects of liberal feminism because they stand to benefit. Like sex positivity because they think it means more women will want to sleep with them for doing less on their part.
No. 511096
>>511090Lmao, hit the nail on the head.
>>511089Yeah they act like all fantasies are the same and they're definitely not.
No. 511105
>>511091It seems a lot of middle aged women are insecure about their age to the extent they resent younger women, even their own daughters who might be basically younger versions of themselves they see every day, so see them as ungrateful or whatever.
>>511092The Dayton shooter sung in a band just like that. Although to be fair I would have zero idea what the lyrics are if they weren't on screen so maybe he just likes the music with little idea what the themes are beyond the edgy titles.
>>511103I went to Afghanistan for work years ago and it was like going back in time to the bronze age. Most live in mudbrick houses living off a few cattle, women are not allowed to leave the house or even speak unless their husband or father is there, universal hijab and often burqas, most people don't know their birthday or have a surname and a lot of women don't even have a name at all, they're just referred to as their fathers daughter.
No. 511109
>>511107Next time she bitches about him to you ask her two questions:
>is he even nice to you >are you happy Women like this are gaslighting themselves by staying in relationships with mean and aggressive thinking that they'll change but they never do.
Disgusting views aside, you gotta make her see how she's not really getting anything out of the relationship despite the shit she puts up with. Show her she'll get no return for her emotional investment and that ought to scare her fine if she's got any sense left. Drop the rope about feminism because 1)he's clearly not and 2)the actual issue is that he's judgmental, condescending, bigoted, and sexist and I'm sure none of that translates to "good guy" behind closed doors.
No. 511111
>>511110if ppls views are not right and are fucked then they're not nice though? their positions are what they're truly thinking and wanting, their actions are only restrained by obligation and the possibility of punishment or alienation. how they act is frankly irrelevant if they're shitbags on the inside.
he's kind of not wrong about the mall cops thing. i don't think overthrowing the (i assume US government) is doable at all. it's laughable as hell, let alone for feminists? i'm not sure why there would be some kind of feminist militia, that's weird. idek why she'd talk about this with him, that's dumb. he sounds like a bunker tard that supports cliven bundy. why would anyone choose to have sex with those men? horrible. literal self harm.
No. 511112
>>511111>why would anyone choose to have sex with those men? horrible. literal self harm.He's sorta good liking, not my type but I can see why she would be into him
>he's kind of not wrong about the mall cops thing. i don't think overthrowing the (i assume US government) is doable at all. it's laughable as hell, let alone for feminists? he says that feminists talk about wanting to start a revolution against the current world order but would literally all die if just a couple men fought back, he's a dumbass who takes everything literally
No. 511116
>>511114I can’t stop crying holy shit. The amount of times I’ve wanted to shoot my face off over scrote rejection I -
Thank god she’s alive and being so positive, good on her and her family.
No. 511118
File: 1579263369825.jpeg (337.19 KB, 1242x1797, 28BDB594-7285-4FB9-933C-ADBFAB…)
End scrots
No. 511120
File: 1579272222515.jpg (131.15 KB, 720x897, 1578302537743.jpg)
>>511119tbf I have some "manhating" radfems, often date men who are indifferent to feminism and thiers girlfriends activism, that doesn't make them any less radfems
No. 511122
>>511114The people calling her stupid. What assholes. That poor girl. She looks good though, I was surprised when they showed her current day vs. before surgery. Face transplants have come so far.
>>511119I used to feel like this but something broke in me, idk. I'll talk to men but but I have a 1 strike policy. First dumb thing you say I'm gone. There's SO MANY desperate scrotes out there it's not hard to find another one. I don't let them in my house or around my animals because I don't trust them, I carry mace.
Treat them like you would a dog that has a history of biting, because ALL men have a history. I honestly enjoy it now. There's something really funny about how shocked men get when you don't entertain their bullshit and can't be baited into arguments. That's literally the only 2 moves they have.
No. 511124
>>511121>wah Jews gave women the ability to overcome being my controllable broodmares and then they had the audacity to give women the power to vote on laws and rights concerning their own bodies and employment and property ownership and all that Jew shitHis mask slid real hard. I actually love it when guys reveal themselves like this on first dates because it's so much easier to break it off and block contact. As opposed to building up months and years of emotional investment. It's difficult to find out later that the guy is a pig. It's much harder to cut off someone you "love" and is so enmeshed in your life by then.
I want more men to be that arrogant and show me their true selves so our hearts don't have to be wasted and broken on them.
No. 511130
>>511128As one of those female friends who used to cry about my shitty ex, you are correct. It's better to be alone than trying to salvage shit with some douche just so I don't feel lonely.
Feeling lonely is a million times better than feeling second rate, rejected, uncared for, anxious, depressed, and lovable only out of convenience because of some ingrate scrote who I'm supposed to be in an "equal" relationship with.
Plenty of my other girlfriends are suffering behind closed doors, they're just too embarrassed to go to anyone about it until it finally spills over. One girlfriend's husband actually fights with her and gets into arguments that make her cry in front of our friend group. Whenever any of us try to interject to deescalate, the male lashes out. He's majorly insecure. But you'd never know that's what their relationship is actually like unless you were in the close friend group. On her social media she's always posting this flowery and twee version of her marriage, including reposting pictures of their expensive ass wedding from years ago.
No. 511144
>>511119This. Especially because I didn't have close friends or a loving family, I put all of the onus on having a romantic relationship and made poor decisions when I was teen.
All of the meaningless platitudes society
tells people like
>tru lurve conquers alldoesn't help either because women learn to put love on a pedestal over their other emotions saying they need to gtfo. In reality love doesn't fix everything and making the right decision is more important than your feelings for him.
No. 511145
File: 1579342610133.png (9.07 KB, 355x474, images.png)
>>511144not too sound like a rick and morty fan but love is just chemicals in our brain, I do somewhat agree with Ayn Rands more realistic take on what love is
No. 511148
File: 1579403110104.jpg (892.23 KB, 3840x2160, 5627556-Ayn-Rand-Quote-If-a-ma…)
>>511145I know she was a shit person but I do agree with her on this
No. 511151
>>511150This is why I can’t bear social media. The original tweet is like something my dad, brother or grandad would say to me without breathing a word about hurr dur muh aggressive women, why is it just this generation of men that are such fucking babies? They take no pride in their status as a male and just want to be babied like they’re fucking kids. From what threat?
The worst that would happen to a man is this; he acts like a POS in public and a woman uses the app to report him to his boss and tell his wife. Boo fuckin hoo. It’s sooooo unlikely that a woman would see a man on the street and decide to ruin his life because he’s hot, if anything they’d ruin the life of an ex or colleague, someone they already know. Only men are that autistically predatory.
No. 511152
>>511150It's really disconcerting when they either don't notice the qualifier of 'aggressive' or identify with the group. Like the OP didn't even say all men. They said aggressive men.
Do they equate that as all men in their eyes? Why do they take such great offense?
No. 511155
>>511154Exactly, they just want to use it to shut people down. Just like during campaigns against breast cancer there always are the guys going "What about prostate cancer? Where is the equality?" when they don't give a shit about prostate cancer otherwise.
Or how they love to bring up male suicide to show how oppressed men are and then call everyone soy boys and beta males.
No. 511156
>>511134i agree! i've seen a lot of anti-fwb arguments (some on lc!) and i just really don't get it. obviously a situation where a woman wants a relationship and gets tricked into being fwb by a man who can't commit is a shitty/
toxic relationship, but if a girl genuinely just wants a hookup bc she wants to get off, and she's not in danger by doing so (ie it's someone she knows and trusts), i feel like it's definitely sexist to say that it's inherently bad/"cheapening" her
No. 511157
>>511156The thing is with my current fwb relationship is that I don't know whether or not were even friends or not, like were both sorta loners and we hang out together, we watch films/tv together, we make fun of other people despite having the same flaws but were not really friends we're kinda acquaintances at best, we sometimes spend countless hours watching tv and not saying a single word to each other, plus we also have sex so its confusing
another thing is that I'm terrified that he might kill himself one day but I don't wanna appear like that I care for him cause I'm afraid he could use that take advantage of me and manipulate me so I say nothing even though I want to
No. 511159
File: 1579747056214.jpeg (740.59 KB, 1125x1130, 6CE802A1-E2FD-4966-9ABE-E94239…)
When rich men want to create chaos so they can steal money from the uneducated broken population this bill will create.
They need more violent men
No. 511163
>>511158What's the worst you've banted about?
The pizza sauce and ramen hack is pretty pathetic lmao. I would've laughed at him too. Like I bet he thought it was such a great discovery, sauce and noodles!
Can you picture how much a woman would get made fun of if she announced she made ramen and tomato sauce? Or worse, if she served that to her significant other and bragged about it like an accomplishment! Lol.
But I guess before I got sidetracked with my own autism, I was gonna say that this kind of banter is so inoffensive. But count on men to be too sensitive for it these days. They'll waggle your finger about what a unprogressive misandrist you are that you didn't clap and cheer when they performed a domestic task with mediocrity.
No. 511168
>>511166>"yeah he does so much around here, but so many other men don't">usual chores that any adult would be doing in the house>"so much"So, in his own mind, he still thinks he does a lot and deserves praise. He just pretends he doesn't to keep peace. How is he even implicated as part of that problem? She literally said he's doing what he's supposed to be doing. Did they have some sort of argument about her not appreciating him doing chores that he's not talking about in that post?
A woman would get torn apart on Reddit for making a post like that.
No. 511169
File: 1579791077645.jpeg (66.6 KB, 1242x817, 68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a…)
>>511166>"i'm a bit upset uwu.">proceeds to post this fucking wall of text on not one BUT TWO different reddits reeeeeing about how much his wife is ungrateful to seek validation from fellow males.Haha, this is the good shit. I love men having full meltdowns and sperging about how they are not upset nonono. Poor poor things. Go cry to your mother.
No. 511170
>>511166>one of my usual chores LOL BULLSHIT! I'm betting 80% of that chore falls on his woman and it's no wonder she doesn't want her friends thinking he does all that much. This anon's got it
>>511168. His words betrayed the reality. I bet she's trying to save face even by telling her friends that the work is split 50-50, I'm sure she's just too embarrassed to admit her husband is a do-nothing who requires worship just to buy and put away groceries. That's why she went on that rant–if you can even believe it was as bad as he says.
And by the way, if he really did "so much" domestically that it swept the wife off her feet, wouldn't she just allow the compliment and recognize him?
No. 511173
>>511172Why can't lesbians be as thirsty as males, especially weeby ones.
And whats wrong with the videogame thread. With all the Animal Crossing posts they're obviously women.
No. 511174
File: 1579825587745.jpg (66.07 KB, 850x400, wwwwgg.jpg)
>>511171in Turkey the military has always been the leading force behind secularism in the country as a result of the foundations laid by Ataturk, whenever some Islamist tried talking power the military would oust him, Erdogan and his party were considered moderate and helped turkey greatly during an economic depression in the 90's, but undeer Erdogan the party shifted more and more towards Islamism and the 2014 failed coup effectively neutered the one thing that could stop him
No. 511177
>>511175You're right, they're usually straight/bi and just call themselves lesbian because it sounds "cooler" and more "misandrist" (due to the stereotype that lesbians hate men). Many straight girls think being straight is "boring" in fandom spaces so they identify as bi but then the place ends up with shitloads of bi girls so it isn't "cool" anymore. This in turn causes some straight/bi girls to call themselves lez to differentiate. It's all a way to NLOG and stand out.
I knew this "lesbian" who was clearly bi. Whenever she fantasized about having a boyfriend or having sex with men, she would just say "that's my comphet acting up!". There was also this actual lesbian but she was identifying as "asexual" because she was too ashamed of being a homosexual and wanted to be celibate. There was also this girl who was quite obviously straight but she kept calling herself a gay trans man because she loved slash fanfiction so much. A lot of women who are really into reading stories about gay men actually end up wanting to become gay men themselves for some reason.
No. 511179
>>511173>>511176Not talking about the theme of the threads in particular but about how those anons express themselves. Between the "happy (insert japanese character name) day!!!!1!1" cringe that males tend to say on other boards, the sudden use of cute emojis (and not being redtexted for it) and the obvious male gaze in some of the games posted, I feel wary (there is an anon talking about how much they "love Lollipop Chainsaw omg truly masterpiece").
I know the Animal Crossing ones are women though, I agree with you lol.
No. 511181
>>511177I kinda want to put an addendum, because back when I had internalized misogyny and was in denial about liking girls, I played a lot of male MC VNs. I liked "seducing girls" even though it was fake girl personalities for horny men. i chose girls by their looks. I eventually switched to otomes and chose the dudes by personality. wished I could have both and unlearned misogyny.
sage for I'm drunk and idk where I'm going with this.
No. 511190
File: 1579860305099.png (97.2 KB, 996x458, 1562680993633.png)
>>511189what about Blanchard?
No. 511195
>>511189The Medium article was a tranny admitting anime turned him trans. Looks like it's gone now, but there are probably archived versions of it.
No strong opinions on Blachard, but the AGP/HSTS theory seems to hold up. Autogynephilia is definitely a thing, and it's gross.
No. 511196
>>511172>>511179I created the LL thread on /m/ after seeing a few anons on /ot/ talk about how they would like a thread to talk about idols without gross scrote shit.
LL in particular has a really big female fan base, so I don't get why it's weird to think that on a website populated largely by weeb girls, there would be some interested in talking about idols.
No. 511197
File: 1579908526641.jpg (346.29 KB, 1985x2896, 9b1rbnowbrc41.jpg)
……..with shit like pic related is it any wonder why and how scrotes think they deserve models?
This guy is a 3/10 if he shaved his chin wig yet he's getting rates like he's average and on the same league as the woman on the left. And look how people fucking nitpick her to death.
No. 511200
File: 1579915362703.png (69.18 KB, 1440x586, Screenshot_2020-01-24-17-21-29…)
I guess men can still get banned for being men. Make up your mind.
No. 511204
File: 1579968811923.jpg (40.9 KB, 400x370, angrycat.jpg)
Ughhh! Just encountered an annoying male fitness trainer while I was inquiring about a gym that I was thinking of joining a few days ago. He started of pretty friendly and gave me a tour of the gym facilities they provide. He then asked questions that I think were unnecessary to ask such as whether I'm single, where I live, do I live alone. I thought nothing of it at first and thought it was part of his sales pitch or something. He then asked how old I was, and I told him I'm 30, he quickly changed his demeanor, becoming less friendly. Maybe he thought I was younger or something and acted super friendly before he knew how old I was.
I just ignored his change of demeanor and continued listening to his sales pitch. Later he asked me whether I could do a short survey and I agreed. There was one question in the survey asking why I'm interested in joining a gym. So I told him it was for health purpose. He stared at me and said are you sure it's just for health purposes? And I said yes, I want to be healthy. He keeps saying is that the only reason? At this point I was puzzled as to why he kept on asking me whether my answer was only for health reasons. I confirmed again yes, I want to join a gym for health purposes and get toned. Then he relented and said something along the lines of "Oh mostly women only go to the gym for beauty purposes and to lose weight!" I was definitely pissed off at this guy at this point. Then he made me even more angry when he said "Oh I get it, since you're single and live alone you need to take care of your health because you have no one around to take care of you."
Needless to say, I decided not to sign up with that particular gym. He was pretty pissed off too when I decided not to sign up for the gym membership after giving a 30 minute sales pitch. Fuck you! I'm not gonna sign up at your stupid gym you stupid ass.
Why do men automatically think that women only go to the gym for beauty and to lose weight? If men go to the gym people automatically think that they go to the gym for health reasons. Men think women only want to be beautiful for them. It's like we exist just to be young and beautiful for them. Ughhh!
I hope I can find a better gym to sign up to. Preferably a woman only gym. Gosh! I hope there's a woman only gym around my area, if not, I have to continue exercising at home.
No. 511206
File: 1580001118018.jpg (512.08 KB, 1080x2220, gey4j8h18r341.jpg)
>girlfriend wants nice and exciting sex
>Boyfriend would rather drain his bank account for other women he can't touch, smell, taste or even interact with most of the time
Imagine paying to look at cars all day and turn down when someone offers you to drive it for free. How do you manage to reach this point of stupidity?
No. 511209
>>511206At this point, that sub is a giant meme where you just fake the lost ridiculous scenerio for up votes. How can you type that unironically and still think "what do I do!"
That first reply is everything
>>511207Seconding that
No. 511215
File: 1580027358672.png (169.95 KB, 708x536, LFEJF?83TFEF1124434.png)
https://www.reddit.com/r/sexover30/comments/dwvrej/husband_wanted_threesome_im_straight_heres_what/Does this read as an incredibly sad experience to anyone else?
This woman wanted to fulfill her husband's fantasy of having an FFM threesome, particularly of seeing girl on girl action while she's absolutely not into women. She spend the whole post explaining how she wasn't aroused, but wasn't disgusted either and try to frame what seems to be a really upsetting experience as a positive one (She says she absolutely isn't into women but wanted to perform with the sex worker to give her husband a "visual treat", yikes)… Oh and she had a "sub drop" the next day, which I think everyone knows is just a trauma response but everything is fine you guys!!
No. 511220
>>511219The "It's fine" pickme's of the world know no bounds. I haven't read it all yet but it seems real so far.
Bad times when a man describes his sexual experience with another woman (and you) as his best sexual experience of his life. If it's real she will find it becomes a regular event, or they'll split up.
No. 511221
>>511220I've got to
>two decades of marriageSo this is people in their 40s, incidentally the usual time for people to get divorced and or start asking for "more" in the bedroom. She spent 2k on this and missed out on a family holiday for it. Tragic.
No. 511228
File: 1580170308096.png (3.22 MB, 750x1334, B33B71F1-09AA-420D-86FD-FB6A85…)
laughing my fucking ass all the way off at all these disgusting neckbeards having literal mental breakdowns because famous basketball man is dead
like imagine them ever caring this much about literally anything fucking else lol. trick question, you can’t bc they don’t
No. 511231
>>511204Gym scrots are just incels that put more work into their appearance than your average incel. I hope you reported him like
>>511207 anon said.
No. 511232
>>511228Leave it to scrotes to mourn a rapist lmao and notice how none of them even mention that his daughter who was 13 died in the crash too? When i heard the news I felt more for the little girl than the rapist that ran free thanks to his batshit crazy fans that threatened the
victim if she said anything that could “end his career”
No. 511235
>>510655Is this honestly real?
Like, I don't get out much, but how in the hell would men feel that way and say "I'm depressed"
No. 511247
File: 1580685486208.jpeg (97.05 KB, 723x840, FD77EE94-8388-4C9F-AC3A-B5B0AC…)
Hardly a day goes by where I don’t ask my self “what the fuck is wrong with men?!?!”
Acquaintance of my shared this fb story.
Why does it seem like men’s humor revolves around 50% sexual humiliation 50% violence? It’s almost like they can’t be happy unless someone else is being hurt in some way.
No. 511248
File: 1580762846286.png (700.12 KB, 640x920, 331549dc5745a0eb97e955025ca429…)
This pissed me off so much
No. 511249
mgtows sub on reddit got quarantined after a member was planning a terrorist attack. Now they're crying. Amazing.
>>511247Alot of men who join the military are gay but believe that being manly and fucking strippers/sex workers that work near their bases with "fix" it
>>511248why are pro life men
like this No. 511250
File: 1580775137167.png (287.45 KB, 500x606, 1576852518316.png)
>>511248>has sex with a woman and cums inside of her and is surprised about pregnancyHe already made his decision the moment he did that.
No. 511255
>>511253Sperging ahead but very good post. You put in words something that has wandered my mind for years after I realized how much men fucking hate each other. Holy shit because they do fucking hate each other, they feel ridiculously threatened by other men who hold different values and behaviors than the ones they've learnt to the point they get phisically violent. I've seen irl more cattiness and backstabbing and overall toxicity from males as a whole than from most girls I've met unless they were specially crazy sorts and male identified. I swear some of them would literally kill to be surrounded by women and not just in the sexual sense because being surrounded by dudes makes them feel like losers or something, look at some internet shitholes. Male company makes them so ridiculously miserable is hilarious. They pretty much drown deep down in each other's shit to the point they lose complete wrasp of reality.
There was something that clicked in my mind when I realized this after all the propaganda we are force-feed in the media about guys being bros and women hoes who hate each other and that we will fuck over each other at every chance we've got… The way they project ALL their fucking bullshit on us and wish we behaved like they do is surreal. The male perception of the world is a complete made up fantasy that is created in his mind, and most of what we're told about relationships and human interaction while we grow up it's a projection of that. Again, sage for sperging.
No. 511314
>>511284Reminds me when I was working 12 hour shifts and getting up at 5:00, I had a headache one day and ex bf gave it the whole “ill spoil you and cook you dinner”
Well he didn’t start cooking till 11pm, despite me reminding him, despite him getting irritated at my reminders, and then he proceeded to chop up a potato in order to make home made chips, on my shitty electric cooker in a frying pan. I’d finished at 6pm. I’d told him I wanted to eat no later than 7 as I’d get horrific indigestion and wouldn’t sleep. I obviously got really stressy at him, because I was so hungry and tired, and it turned into a pretty nasty fight, where he told me that I don’t appreciate anything he does for me.
Another time he decided to do my laundry for me while I was at work, despite me not asking him. He put 2 big bags in the washing machine at the laundrette, and then instead of hanging them up or using tunble dryer, he simply left it all in the bag for me to deal with, meaning by the time I got home the clothes stank of mildew and needed to be washed again. Of course, he got very angry that I didn’t jump for joy over him creating more work, more mess, more stress and expecting to be fucking hailed as a king for it. He seriously expected me to just shut my mouth and thank him, when he’d fucked the whole thing up, and then didn’t want to listen to me telling him how to do laundry, or that he can’t really say he’s “cooking dinner for me” when he knows I have to get up so early and continues playing vidya long into the night, until fucking 11 pm, I HAD TOLD HIM I WANTED DINNER AT 7 AND TO GO TO BED AT 9 FFS. I TOLD HIM THAT ID BE HAPPIER IF HE JUST LET ME DO EVERYTHING MYSELF IF HE WOULDNT LISTEN TO ME.
This cunt had a mother with 5 other sons, not one of them knew how to do a goddamn thing.
No. 511325
don't know if it's right place to post it but idc. i'm done.
i met a guy online couple days ago and it was fine, he seems caring, we have simmilar intrests, blah, blah
we were sexting once and now he texts me from work, telling me to masturbate in the morning, and how to do it and sends me dick picks. Honestly i'm not even suprised, i know men, you send them one nude and they think they own you.
My biggest problem is, why do I feel obligated to continue with it, or that I own him sth now. I spend over 2 hours thinking how to tell him, that i'm not into that in a way that wont upset him, or hurt his feelings. And I realise how ridiculous is that, but I can't help to feel guilty that I don't want to participate in his stupid fantasy. I don't now what tf is wrong with me
sned help pls
No. 511332
>>511314I've met several guys who after moving out of the family home and living with housemates, would collect up their dirty laundry, go home, get mom to wash it and then bring it back to their rented abode.
Generally when they move out it will be the first time one of them ever loaded up a washing machine or attempted to feed themselves (hence struggle noodle diets)
I think men struggle to do the basics, like wash themselves, and things like cooking and washing clothes are beyond their comprehension. Men are all autistic to a degree so unless something is a special interest of theirs they will have no clue or interest in it.
No. 511352
>>510647>>511332My mother told me from a young age how to do things like cooking, cleaning and washing up etc. When ever anyone asked me what I wanted to be I would say “I want to be a mummy” and I meant it/still do mean it so I don’t/never did find it sexist to be encouraged to learn these things, I’m grateful that my mother taught me these things and prepared me for living on my own. What I do think is sexist is I had to teach my brother who is 4 yrs older than me how to wash his clothes properly because his machine was full of mould! He was getting stressed because “my clothes always smell like shit”
My brother is by no means stupid or lazy either, so when you get men who are? Hoo boy are they a NIGHTMARE
No. 511367
>>511325He's being awful sexual with you for only having known you for a day or so? He didn't even wait until a third date!
I wouldn't trust someone like that. More than likely he's got a harem of women he texts en masse and gets off on ordering them around sexually. He's the type that moves fast and isn't exclusive. Not relationship material.
No. 511373
File: 1580910691441.png (219.6 KB, 1080x1351, Screenshot_20200206-004926~2.p…)
You love to see it :)
No. 511374
>>511367lol, he didn't even waited untill first date, we're about to meet tomorow
>>511343thanks, i nedded that kind of encouragement
No. 511394
>>511383for fear of retaliation, verbal abuse, spite, just general sense of obligation that is hard to unlearn, especially if you have low self esteem, and even more so if you are someone that has been abused. i have gone to great lengths doing things romantically and sexually that i didn't want to do, for men i was never attracted to at all, out of obligation and fear that they'd insult me, try to embarrass me, hurt me, try to crush my feelings when i was already vulnerable, or just try to ruin my life. almost all of my interactions with males have been like this. in reality, i've not liked any male i've spoken to, save for one. eventually i get away from them and always have the intent to, but i often feel like i have no choice but to reciprocate in the immediate moment. sometimes i have even escalated exchanges because i feel there is an implicit expectation i'm expected to meet and if i don't, i'll be told i'm a waste of time or otherwise berated and lashed out at. really bothers me because when i have tried to explain this to men later on, they don't believe me or understand me. they think it's an excuse. men will never understand.
No. 511412
>>511325Block him, no response needed. He jumped way ahead of himself in just assuming he could boss you around sexually and once you block him he'll get the message
Fuck his feelings
No. 511416
>>511383Spent two years walking on eggshells around my partner, he never worried about hurting me though. As a result I regularly cried over things he did to me and he labelled me 'overly emotional'
I can't stress just how much I had to bite my tongue on a daily basis so as not to set him off..
No. 511419
>>511394 > I've not liked any male i've spoken to, save for oneI was listening to a song lately and I heard the lyrics "When you cry, you waste your time. Over boys you never liked"
Realised in that moment that I had been 'heartbroken' twice over men that I honestly can't say I even liked. I didn't sacrifice myself in lots of ways because I loved these guys, I did it because of my own emotional shit from early on in life
No. 511430
File: 1580919076379.jpg (541.36 KB, 1080x1470, 20200205_170649.jpg)
Why are men so sensitive? A guy asked me to recommend him some femdom manga, so I sent him Nagatoro-san. He told me he doesn't like it, so I apologized and moved on. Then, days later he sent me pic rel. Lol.
If he is not into femdom, then why did he ask me about femdom manga in the first place? Why do men always have to ve victims?
No. 511432
>>511430You should just reply
Cool
No. 511442
>>511438Femdom has nothing to do with it, I'm just laughing at this huge
victim complex.
No. 511451
>>511383Sometimes rejecting a male is the worst option you could do for yourself. It pains me to think of all the women who've ever been raped, restrained, verbally berated, physically assaulted, or killed because they dared not spare a man his feelings.
It's happened to myself. Sometimes I think I did things and had sex like "I chose this" because that is a more palatable cope than realizing how much men have hurt me at my expense for their gain.
I've lived through all that and yet I'm to feel sorry and coddle some man because I tell him I don't want to touch his penis. Men are so mentally weak and fragile.
No. 511453
>>511218Reminds me of the r/polyamory thread on kiwifarms which is 99% male posters there getting assblasted over being "cucked". Every posted scenario is polyandry, despite moids asking for open relationships and threesomes being vastly more common.
There's also a lot of sympathy for silly scrots who asked for an open relationship and then changed their minds upon finding out that the gf is getting more action, kek.
No. 511454
>>511451Spent three years dating and living with a guy who never gave me an orgasm, I still didn't have the guts to ever say no any time he wanted me to just get him off by hand/mouth. It was easier than dealing with his bad mood or having him give me the silent treatment or ignore me in front of his son for days afterwards.
He was pleasant to everyone else in his life though! They know exactly how to emotionally punish women. They see us as highly emotional beings and in their minds they must abuse that or use that to their advantage. Then they bitch about women being too emotional. Win win for them
No. 511456
File: 1580921767931.jpg (59.68 KB, 500x625, Snapchat-1789290938.jpg)
>>511230Mothering male offspring cucks women horribly, anon. The main reason why patriarchy exists is because women can't go against their fathers and especially sons, whereas men don't feel the same about their daughters and mothers. Remove maternal instinct and empathy asymmetry from the equation and things will look completely different.
No. 511457
File: 1580921853421.png (301.88 KB, 1096x472, 333333333333.png)
>>511453Found the kiwi farm thread an hooo boy. The lesbian was based tho
No. 511458
File: 1580922091402.png (289.82 KB, 1128x422, veto.png)
>>511457hooooooo boooooooy
No. 511459
>>511453This made me think of a podcast I watched lately. Chad/anything4views is forever appearing on different channels and podcasts and talking about how his open relationships are only open to other women. He pulls women way above his league and he expects sex at the end of dates cos "he knows a place where he has bought sex for cheaper than his average date" I don't know how he appears on the misfits podcast and similar and says that shit while even the other men in the room look somewhat uncomfortable
He bitches about an ex on the Cold Ones podcast and claims to fall in love so easily, which is why his average relationship lasts a month. He's always surrounded by men who look slightly bothered by his comments but say nothing
No. 511464
>>511419that's absolutely right. same for me, particularly because of the abuse and just general female socialization that is very pernicious. at times i know i'd try to convince myself i liked them even though i knew very clearly that i didn't, just to rationalize what i was doing, how i was bending over backwards to go against my feelings and instinct in order to pacify them. men make me feel so alone and their presence disgusts me. i used to think it was possible that i was closeted because they just disgusted me so much. now when i disclose this to men they assume it's whore behavior when it really isn't…
>>511462she's right though… mothering males generally turns these women into ballfluffers because they internalize every criticism as an attack against their precious son, who they also coddle and cannot accept are not good people.
No. 511479
>>511474no one said either of these things. so sick of the dramatization and sensationalist phrasing. stop it. go back to /r/gendercritical
>>511476tbh i think socialization is a big part of it but there's no way unless you've got your son hooked up to an iron lung out in the minnesotan wilderness, that you're going to raise a male child removed enough from the toxicity to be truly good. it's just not possible. they're pissing in the wind.
No. 511484
>>511474Pinkpill is impossible if your son is somehow NAMALT. Fact: your son will most likely watch violent,
abusive porn without any regard for the female participants. Fact: if you actively try to raise your son to be a "feminist", he will resent you either covertly or openly. Fact: your son is a biological male and thus a subject to male biological imperative of boner>all. The fact that you think that despite statistics you believe yourself to be somehow special enough to have a good shot at "training" him out of it reminds me of people who keep large predators as pets.
No. 511490
File: 1580923931570.png (300.9 KB, 500x399, tumblr_inline_ot0v7eeNPr1ubcbi…)
>>511476yep Gail Dines, Carole pateman, Lillian Faderman are all hacks compared to you, you're clearly the better women's right activist
No. 511496
>>511457>>511458"Polyamory" aka cheating with permission relationships are so nasty. Literally no benefit to the woman unless she has a harem of attractive men who make her orgasm and spoil her. Yet we all know it never plays out in the aforementioned way. When men say they want polyamory, they mean they wanna be the ones banging multiple people while expecting the women to stay exclusive to their penis only.
One time this low value male who lied to me into dating him kept testing the waters to see if I would be open to polyamory. He was deluded into believing multiple women would want him at once. It was so disgusting. One day I had enough with his remarks and asked "What's the benefit for women?" regarding that sort of relationship. He meekly replied "W-well the women can cuddle with each other while I'm away…" LOL. Oh yes dude, you're so fucking irresistible that a bunch of straight cis women would wait around and cuddle each other until you'd come around to fuck them or force them to perform in threesome for your bisexual female fantasies.
I laughed at him. Then his second reply was a more stern appeal to nature, because if wild animal males fuck and impregnate multiple women then it must follow in human relationships even though that DID NOT ANSWER MY FUCKING QUESTION about how that shit benefits women at all!
Run, don't walk, away from these gross delulu scrotes.
No. 511497
>>511488i think everything has to do with the fact that men are selfish retards, plain as that. i'm not going into evo-psych because it's literally all shoddy as fuck. men can't even be coaxed into doing what's best for them because they're so spectacularly retarded. they're tribalistic spastics that will follow "tradition" even if shown to be seriously detrimental to them. something that is traditional, enforced by men, and beneficial to them will never be questioned by them. they're just retards who follow easily in the footsteps of other men because despite their posturing, they're cockjuggling homos.
>>511490what's being discussed is not "who is a better women's rights activist", like, at all. you're moving the goalposts and it just makes no sense to even sacrifice yourself in any respect by giving birth and raising children unless you're going to adopt and try to save a child from their suffering/potential harm or from becoming a danger.
No. 511512
>>511457I've had one 'kind-of' threesome experience as a lesbian where I did stuff with just the woman, I had no contact with the guy myself and was very clear about the fact that I wouldn't. I met this couple through my local fetish scene (ten years ago, I'm not that stupid anymore) and later found out this man had abused several different partners. I've never been so glad to be VERY fucking clear about my desire to only be intimate with the woman.
She contacted me months later and told me how he had been violently
abusive in their relationship. Far from the 'ooh cool and kinky poly' relationship that they portrayed at the time
No. 511518
>>511517She'd say the magic words
"ooh true submission tho" kek
No. 511521
>>511515I can't help but notice the past tense, what happened anon?
>>511517Well, considering the fact that he is locked in a chastity belt and can't rape anyone, I am not worried about that.
>>511518He has proven himself to me several times, I have no fear of him. He is utterly submissive to me and pretty much every woman around. He is no danger to us.
>>511519Maybe because lesbians can get pregnant?
No. 511525
>>511507Americans are really weird about what they perceive as "cheating", so maybe that's why (s)he's reacting poorly. Even pinkpills will shun any suggestion of female infidelity like it's literal Holocaust, which is hilarious because one of the ways moids maintain their chokehold is by memeing women into shilling male reproductive interests to their fellow women. In most cultures, it's the women who enforce assorted chastity bullshit with young girls (a-la aunts from handmaid's tale).
I generally treat female cheating the same way men treat male cheating, and my only "fetish" is male butthurt.
No. 511526
File: 1580925861620.jpg (8.54 KB, 264x191, ex.jpg)
>>511521>Well, considering the fact that he is locked in a chastity beltpinkpill has nothing do with your disgusting fetish
No. 511532
>>511526>Muh sensitivitiesYou might wanna take a break from the internet if you can't deal with people talking about things you dislike. Also my "fetish" is a way of life, not just wank material and it is actually the pink pillest of pink pills, not that I care to engage in this dialogue.
>>511529I am sorry anon, can't imagine him just leaving like that. Hope you will meet someone else, he probably had some issues himself.
No. 511542
>>511524> they feel women with postpartum who kill their own kids are 'coddled' and men who kill their kidsThey're just not supported properly. If they had the support of their communities and their mate, it would drastically decrease their stress, ease their physical burden, and reassure them that there's enough resources to go around. Motherhood could be rewarding for women with great support systems but really those aren't so common. We ask men to be decent and considerate of new mothers and of course they get called coddled. Ugh.
Men who kill children, especially their own, are nothing but rabid dogs that need to be put down.
They'll kill their own children out of jealousy because their women give their helpless children more attention while God forbid men are forced to self soothe and not have their dicks serviced.
They'll kill children they're stepfathered to because they don't wanna be "cucked" into raising another man's children and want the woman to be focused solely on his own genetic children.
Men also kill children because they don't want to be tied down by things like child support and other demands if they split to go fuck and impregnate other women. So they "accidentally" kill them so they'll be off the hook to go have children with women who demand less.
No. 511545
>>511540That's scary to think anon, I guess you are right though, this switch is possible. But thinking about it just makes me paranoid.
>>511544Eh you are right, it's the second best option and of course it is not a competition. But for us straight women it's kind of the best we can do. Lesbians and Bi women always have the best option to just ignore romantic relationships with males.
No. 511546
>>511529>>511521>>511532>>511541You're relationships failed because it was built upon a fetish, your fetish is not a way of life, your husband still has power over you, he can take the cage off on his own, he lets you peg him because he likes orgasams and doesn't like putting any effort in
eventually one of two conclusions will happen
he will realize that this he's a degenerate with just a dumb fetish and will divorce you and try to learn how to be a normal person OR his fetishes will get even WORSE, piss, diaper, scat play, yiffing are all things you will be dealing with in the future anon
No. 511547
>>511528you're right. polyamory is beneficial for men in certain ways, as is monogamy. the fact is that being in a relationship with men or even having romantic or sexual contact with them, under the framework of patriarchy, is still a relationship of oppressed and oppressor. there is no escaping it. even if they're truly submissive (best case scenario), they're still reaping many more benefits than you, are, even subconsciously. (unless you're like, actually abusing them, then idk). if everything should remain psychologically healthy, there's no true equal, ever. i think either way women will still have more of a mental load, be doing more emotional labor, still will never be seen as truly human, etc. the only thing to do is to remove yourself fully from the equation if you don't want to be romantically and sexually subjugated in some sense or another. the idea that we aren't human is too deeply internalized in males to ever be in an equal relationship with them. they can't empathize with us, and if they do, it's never to the extent that they empathize with males. this means the relationship will never truly be equal, even if there are financial benefits or whatever.
>>511530i'm not saying they're mimicking male behavior. i'm saying it is male behavior. these women are stupid and easily led, i don't care if they're lesbians or not.
>>511532>actually the pink pillest of pink pills, not that I care to engage in this dialogue.i personally would like a truly submissive male partner but it's not the pinkest of pills. the pinkest pill is not engaging with men romantically or sexually. a female led relationship with a submissive man is the next best option. it's not a competition. some women are okay with settling for some amount of subjugation in exchange for companionship and romance, whatever. that's fine, but it's not the pinkest pill.
No. 511549
>>511533Implying males are capable of that. Whether he's sub and vanilla, he's only in it for himself, doesn't matter if it ends up benefitting him or not. Your approach to tard wrangling is completely flawed if your idea of hitting the jackpot is "genuine love".
Males exist to bring value into your life and to be discarded for a better option if they fail to perform. If you're going to tard wrangle at all, you're not going to succeed with a Disney mentality. Caring about their motives for investing in you is a childish waste of time. A woman whose husband only wanted her for sex but ended up making her rich after death or divorce is better off than a woman in an uwu pure romantic relationship that yields nothing except fragile mental comfort from the assumption that he's "pure".
No. 511559
>>511546My relationship absolutely failed because even as a 24/7 lifestyle it was ultimately a fantasy. I'm fully aware of just how naive I was. People in the 24/7 side of things are damaged and need therapy, not marriage licenses. It's childish to think you can build a relationship around a kink and keep such a power dynamic in a real adult relationship. It is not sustainable long term
I hung out in a scene full of that and surprise, we're all divorced or separated now by 30
No. 511569
>>511565How is having control of your household and husband dumb? It's the second (as corrected above) most pink pilled thing you can do.
>>511566My personal experience says otherwise, my husband is a lawyer for example. Real 24/7 is not some male fantasy where they clean shit around the house in a maid uniform. It means they live their lives with your interest in mind. If anything the best way to describe them is chibalrous.
No. 511578
>>511562I've known older people in the kink scene, their relationships were like car crashes and they had seriously unaddressed mental health issues where they were always chasing a natural high from sex or kink
I left at 25 and have lots of tales of cheaters and even rapists from my short few years seeing all the goings on. I was 'open minded' until I simply couldn't ignore the bullshit anymore
No. 511584
>>511579>pink pill thread>talk about pink pill relationships>No don't do that, it makes me uncomfortableSounds like a you problem.
>>511581To people who reject anything out of their comfort zone? I do what I do in my house, don't compare me to those sex crazed"kink scene" idiots.
No. 511585
>>511573Only those who see you as low value. A male who insults your physical appearance has no business being your boyfriend unless he's paying your bills and you don't give a shit because you're going to cuck him anyway.
The correct way to react to remarks about your looks is to switch your attention to another man who has no problem with them. Don't moralize or point anything out to him, just go wherever you're wanted. Incidentally, his behavior will probably change too because moids are naturally excited by the idea of not being a woman's only option.
No. 511586
>>511576Well you are here insisting there's nothing wrong with your kink lifestyle after a fair amount of anons tell you they disagree lol.
I'd make like a shibari and drop the rope.
No. 511587
>>511579you're so obviously necessaryspeed.
>>511582then he's not nice. he's just more nice than most other men. it isn't worth dealing with.
No. 511598
>>511582He's taking calculated jabs at your self esteem to make you pursue his approval and sell yourself short. It's working. Believe me, those are not thoughtless insensitive remarks. Even if they're instinctive and not necessarily planned, the purpose is to make you less confident and thus less appealing to other males. It's a basic fidelity ensuring strategy, something they're sometimes not even consciously aware of.
If you're still looking to stick around, start subtly comparing him to other males and gaslighting him when he reacts poorly. Start checking out other men in his presence, too. Dress like you're still on the dating market and act like you're not exclusive. Only dispense affection when he provides you with a material token of it
That's only if you're still looking to tard wrangle him, of course. I'd just put myself on a dating app and ghost him. I know that right now it feels like you really like him (lol oneitis), but it goes away really quickly when you're exposed to other options.
No. 511606
>>511602And there's nothing wrong with that. Think of it less in terms of being an asshole and more in terms of self interest.
As a woman you have an organic need to be unconditionally kind, but you need to understand that being kind towards bad people is bad. Trust me, there is nothing more freeing than not feeling any obligation, guilt or cognitive dissonance towards moids. Just do what benefits you and be happy.
No. 511620
>>511613She's right though, it's why so many women find themselves stuck in shit relationships and marriages in the first place. We're socialized to be self sacrificing, nurturing, and forgiving.
While some people respect those traits, most men are more than comfortable to take advantage. Men are socialized to be selfish and put themselves first.
No. 511646
>>511620I know too many women who've stuck out bad relationships for years but once they make any stand against the husbands treatment he dips and moves on as soon as it suits him. We're way more self sacrificing but I think it comes down to men convincing us we owe them something.
We think that 'commitment' is a gift men give to women, when it's not. I think a lot of our issues are rooted in that. It makes us cling and try to please them while they appear to hold power over us
No. 511661
>>511625Who socialized women this way?
Females give birth and nurture a helpless undercooked fetus that's only able to communicate via assorted screams. You misinterpreted one screech from it and it dies. How do women instinctively know what the fetus wants despite not looking like the fetus, not being a fetus herself and having no way to determine what it's thinking through conversation?
This is where the empathy gap comes from. Males did not need to evolve the ability to accurately interpret the mental states of anything that doesn't look like them, so they will never have the same level of concern for women as vice versa. That's why the average whiteknight just wants to get laid, whereas the average pickmeisha is mostly stanning dicks because being mean to males is AbStRaCtLy UnFaIr and ReVeRsE SeXiSt. At the lowest level there is definitely some self interest in the form of prosocial approval and signalling her docility, but it's not as straightforward as stone cold opportunism of "pro female" males.
If women had male levels of empathy/theory of mind, men would be routinely killed and maimed for the kind of treatment they subject women to. No man would tolerate this degree of atrocity while whiteknighting and cooing the gender that perpetrates it. What you refer to as "patriarchy" wasn't established through physical force alone.
What are you going to do if your son is a rapist or an incel? 99% of "feminist" women would promptly make an exemption for him despite tweeting #killallmen all day, even if they're radfems.
No. 511671
>>511661Men hold us to that ridiculous standard of empathy too, they're fully aware that they expect us to give much more than them.
Only once has anybody called me out on a 'lack of empathy'. It was an ex who didn't give a fuck about ever accommodating my needs. I (with a pretty intense vomit phobia) had to leave the house after his teen son walked into our room one morning and projectile vomited at the end of our bed. I was expected to overcome a lifelong phobia and comfort a nearly grown man who is not mine. I went for a walk (which somehow means no empathy) and he never failed to bring it up in every future argument. The single example he could drag up of me, a woman, lacking empathy. He was trying to give me a complex as if my worth depended on having a perfect empathy score
No. 511874
>>511869'Living your whole life around a guys sexual tastes is totally pinkpill, I mean his kink is being nice to me which is at least better than a kink of degrading me right??'
She's really on here bragging lol
No. 511877
>>511849Same childhood here. Then I spent three years of my twenties with a controlling man who acted like earning more money than me gave him 100 percent dictatorship over everything in the household and relationship.
Walking on eggshells again brought back all sorts of early memories. Then my dad shows no reaction whatsoever when I reveal my partner had been beating me for three years
No. 511912
>>511907Anon…him almost breaking your fingers and then choking you is a huge predictor that he is going to harm you worse or even kill you! You need to pack up and disappear from him since yesterday, this is a "code red: enraged male is putting my life in incredible danger!"
"All men are bad" is something bitches like me say because we suspect our new dates are spinning other women and that's why they're shit communicators who never text or call and pretend they're too busy with work.
Meanwhile your situation could mean literal life or death.
No. 512022
File: 1581010394598.jpeg (119.46 KB, 750x290, 5669B123-430F-4E2B-A755-103D7A…)
Anyone else see this? A journalist asks a relevant question and is receiving threats for it and was even forced to apologize…….for bringing up that a man was a rapist
No. 512030
>>511955>>511958sorry for no sauce but there an article on the other farms about a study or something on pedophiles claiming literally this, like pedos looking at material had the same parts of the brain as regular non pedo fathers lit up for their own children but in overdrive while aroused. Basically they had their wires for 'affection for cute things' crossed right into 'I wanna fuck it'. Not saying "all pedos just have misunderstood love for kids" and I'm probs massively misremembering that article but yeah. It would explain why women aren't pedos as often because the maternal instinct is fundamental whereas human males have spent chunks of civilization ignoring their own children and it was considered normal.
>>512006so based on this I'm thinking it's a mix: they're shittier at empathy and quicker to violence, not naturally wired for bonding so when they do it auto-links to the first thing that's not to do with fighting: fucking.
No. 512033
>>512022Well that disappoints me. I thought he had been cool but I guess if he wants to go the rape apologist route……..sigh.
Is there any man who doesn't spring on the defensive when his fellow males get called out for violence?
None of em have a clean conscience.
No. 512039
>>512030No just no.
Men dont want to fuck children because they are cute….they want to fuck children because they are children and have undeveloped bodies and minds.
Many pedophiles (not all) are into GORE, hurtcore explicit cp, and many of these
victims in cp get dressed in makeup and provocative clothes that adults wear…
No. 512041
>>512036Then wouldn't it be biologically better for men to only go after grown women with wide hips then since they can bear the healthiest offspring.
It makes no sense why men want to fuck little girls and boys.
Mens pedophilia will always be mystery to me.
The day we find out why men want to fuck children will be the apocalypse
No. 512049
>>512043yes,but im trying to understand why men want to fuck children and why are men so obsessed with age and children.
Straight men sexualized the word teen and hate women over 25 and gay men made the word twink and
normalized sleeping with underage boys in gay communities.
No. 512054
>>512052Maybe you just poorly worded yourself but how does your husband molesting your child make you want to be with them wtf?
Also as i said you are making this into a straight man pedo only thing when there are gay and bisexual pedos.
No. 512059
File: 1581013578284.png (297.49 KB, 389x388, tumblr_befbca5a20cd144c8d7b81b…)
>>512022>>512033>>512055What i dont understand is why you are all acting surprised.
Snoop dog had women on leashes to a award show once and he used to be a pimp
No. 512079
>>512041It doesn’t have to make sense, evolution isn’t a careful, efficient planner, it takes the nearest easiest option. A lot of weird traits and behaviors arise from incidental things or faulty associations. Like the species of beetle that plunged in population because they found that the males preferred to fuck trashed beer bottles coincidentally shaped like an exaggerated giant female of their species, you’d think there’s other shit in there to check ‘is this alive, is it fertile’ but no. The only thing capable of saving them is the conscientiousness to stop but they’re fucking bugs. I
had hope for human men because they’re sapient and have a conscience but tbh it’s unrealistic for them to hold off behavioral degeneracy forever. We’re already seeing backlash with ‘downtrodden’ white males becoming more insecure and depressed, combined with, well, being male that’s a powder keg ready to go.
No. 512083
>>512041They only screech about wide hips, big breasts, youthfulness, etc when it gives them an excuse to shit on women's bodies or cheat, but do a 180 when it comes to pedophilia because they get off so much on the idea of hurting little children and fucking up their minds forever that they don't care about muh 50 inch hips or D cup breasts, like they do with women
Men are truly a sick breed
No. 512086
>>511907I hope you're alright anon. And I really hope you left. Don't announce it, just grab your things and go. Block him on everything and go. Also yes, please report him.
>>512064They want to freely abuse kids and call it a sexuality/kink. Then whine when people want to kill them for it. What a sick lot. Those with age ranges that extend into adulthood are worse though. Since they can convince everyone that they aren't getting off to cp by dating or marrying an adult and maintaining a relationship.
No. 512095
>>511907I'm so sorry anon, if you are able please get that hand checked out at a hospital, it sounds like he nearly broke your fingers off. All because you mentioned
his failing of cheating. You did nothing wrong and yet you were punished.
No. 512103
>>512001Male biology is sexual opportunism. You should never unironically buy into what they say they're into, because what men say they want and what they actually want are two very different things.
While they may delude themselves about having some abstract set of standards or an "ideal", in practice they go for anything that's least likely to resist or demand greater investment. By nature a man doesn't have many options, which is something most of them resent greatly. Some low sexual value males post hoc rationalize their inability to get what's commonly deemed desirable (conventionally attractive high value woman of fertile age) as an honest preference for what they are reasonably able to get (a child, an amputee, a trap, a corpse, an animal, a mail order bride, you name it). Eventually the "preference" may be solidified through conditioning, but you should rarely take anything they say about it face value. Basically, you should stop seeing male sexuality in terms of preference and more in terms of access/options. Any man will become a pedophile if he has nothing else to choose from.
You may have noticed that most pedophiles tend to have some sort of palpable vendetta against "old" women, acting like they're "showing" them. The same mentality is found in sex tourists who seem to prefer incessant screeching about white western women to actually having sex with third world waifus. They can't seem to enjoy their "preference" without some nebulous outside spectator who's supposed to feel "at loss" because the low value male has "chosen" the only thing he has a chance with.
No. 512107
>>512030An interesting take. Thought be mindful of selection bias. Most men participating in these studies are "true" pedophiles aka the ones who got caught/are deemed pedophiles by the system. They're frequently autistic or otherwise mentallly disabled. It does not account for opportunistic pedo/hebephilia that's found in "normal" straight males (see: cultures that allow child marriage).
The latest theory in sexology is that male attraction is inherently paraphilic and operates along a spectrum that goes basically like:
I like this thing -> I want to fuck this thing -> I want to become this thing
A lot of paraphilias do seem to culminate in some sort of transformation fetish. Also, something like 50% of pedos are autopedophiles.
No. 512118
>>512111thats because there is alot of scrotes (men)who lurk these board thats why.
>>512110this was made by a scrote. fuck off and go back to 8chan
No. 512123
>>512120So you think once a child turns 13 that they are suddenly grown and that men being attracted to them is normal.
Fuck off pedo male scrote.
And hebe are the same thing as pedos both of them are attracted to children and many hebes are pedophiles in denial because i see those sick fucks lusting over 10 year old girls.
No. 512124
>>512121you are literally defending men who are attracted to 13-14 year olds…..you are the lowest of the low. You are garbage.
Human garbage.
No. 512125
>>512121… You thought "it's not that bad for adults to rape teenagers" was going to be well-received in this thread?
Scrote apologism.
No. 512127
>>512123Ignoring you obvious attempt to instigate infighting
>And hebe are the same thing as pedos both of them are attracted to childrenNo they are not.
>and many hebes are pedophiles in denial because i see those sick fucks lusting over 10 year old girls.Then they aren't hebes, they are pedos.
>So you think once a child turns 13 that they are suddenly grown and that men being attracted to them is normal.When the fuck did I say that? I said it's a lot less deviant, I didn't endorse it. Also it is not about age, it's about the onset of puberty. Pedos are not attracted to teens who have sexual characteristics, hebes do.
>>512124When the fuck did I defend them? Saying that they are not on the level of paraphilia as pedos is not a defense, calling someone better than Hitler is not a compliment.
>>512125>… You thought "it's not that bad for adults to rape teenagers" was going to be well-received in this thread?Are you having hallucinations? Because I never said such a thing.
>>512126Of course. My distinction was based on the post I was replying.
No. 512128
>>512107>I like this thing -> I want to fuck this thing -> I want to become this thingThis is a pretty astute analysis. It's pretty much the logical conclusion of all cumbrain shit, and it explains sissy fetishism/bimboification.
When men learn to associate certain beings with pleasure, it only makes sense they'd see becoming that being as the "ultimate" form of pleasure. That, or torturing and destroying it, I guess.
No. 512132
>>512126Why would you say
>I thought I was suppposed to be called a handmaiden first.it seems that you are defending the act.
No. 512134
>>512111I think anon's point was that pedos and hebes are different, not that either is acceptable.
>pedochildren that haven't gone through puberty
>hebeteenagers that are underdeveloped and going through puberty
Both are sick fucks that need to be euthanised.
No. 512135
>>512125its just funny how they think that women dont know what those words mean or that we dont venture off into male spaces.
>>512127Your manipulation wont work on me because i know what the word hebe means, so dont try to act like a retard now.
Hebephilia is literally the attraction to 11-14 year olds……and you are saying this is somehow better.
>>When the fuck did I defend them? Saying that they are not on the level of paraphilia as pedos is not a defenseI find it hilarious how you were previously defending hebephilia but when i mentioned the age that hebe's are attracted to (11-14) now you are trying to backpedal and say that you were not trying to defend them.
You are on the wrong board,you cannot manipulate women here
No. 512136
>>512134Hebephilia is the strong, persistent sexual interest by adults in pubescent (early adolescent) children (especially those showing Tanner stages 2 to 3 of development), which is typically ages 11–14
Bye sick fuck
No. 512137
>>512127Your first post
>>512110 seemed very defensive.
Hebephilia begins at 11 years old, and ends at 14. Whether you think it's blatant or not, you're essentially defending men sexualizing 11-14 year olds and saying it's "a lot less deviant" by trying to create some sort distinction outside of the realm of cold scientific analysis.
It's all deviant, and it's all bad. It all falls under taking advantage of young people, and that's the issue. Splitting hairs is what someone does when they're part of one group and want to save their skin.
Do you get now why you look like a scrote to some anoons? I'm not saying you are, but it looks bad.
No. 512139
if you are a sick fuck attracted to 11 year old children then i will call you a pedophile and i dont give a fuck about whatever bullshit labels like ''hebe'' you want to call yourselves because you are a sick pedo who is attracted to 11 year old children
>>512138Its very obvious that they are a lurking male scrote who got butthurt at us talking about them being pedo's
No. 512141
>>512136If they don't fuck off now, I really wonder how they're going to try and convince people that 11 year olds aren't children.
I see these "uhm ackshually sweaty it's not
exactly pedophilia–" types shitting up Reddit and 4chan all the time. Can't believe they thought they could pull it off here, too, lmao.
No. 512143
>>512137>anoons*anons
Ffs my "o" key is stuck
No. 512144
File: 1581026342977.jpg (51.98 KB, 475x356, M2VKdH6.jpg)
>>512142yeah, it's just paranoia. why would men come here to troll women?
No. 512147
File: 1581026479593.jpg (54.3 KB, 630x630, 1507632172862.jpg)
>>512142LOOK AT THIS RETARD TRY TO BACKPEDAL NOW.
Hilarious.
No. 512149
>>512147>Admit you were wrong>Retard thinks you are backpedalling Kindly fuck yourself.
>>512148Yeah not shit, I never said it's acceptable, I said it's a different paraphilia than pedos.
No. 512151
>>512150I mean…
Ephebophilia is used only to describe the preference for mid-to-late adolescent sexual partners, not the mere presence of some level of sexual attraction. Generally, the preference is not regarded by psychologists as a pathology when it does not interfere with other major areas of one's life, and is not listed by name as a mental disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5), the ICD-10, or as a paraphilia.
Researchers state that hebephilia, erotic interest which centers on young pubescents, has not come into widespread use, even among professionals who work with sex offenders, and may have been confused with the term ephebophilia, which denotes a preference for older adolescents.[1] It is concluded that "few would want to label erotic interest in late—or even mid—adolescents as a psychopathology, so the term hebephilia may have been ignored along with ephebophilia".[1]
No. 512158
>>512145What are anons supposed to think when they see ostensibly male-brained posts?
If I enter a pink pill thread, and there's "coincidentally" a user posting the same BS opinions I've seen over and over on shitholes like /r9k/, it's more likely than not to be a lurking scrote.
Handmaidens are usually smarter. By virtue of not being men, they're already used to not having the internet back them up and cater to them at every point. They probably already have the thread hidden because they know trying to change everyone's mind is pointless, or, at worst, they'll try their hardest to have the thread removed and/or locked.
The #1 most common place we all see this "Ok but it's not REALLY pedophilia guise" argument is in male-dominated communities.
No. 512159
>>512158Because it was not a male brained post, it was wrong as I had confused hebe and ephebe (fucking Greek). I can see how the misatke might have changed how it was seen though.
>>512154I am not arguing with that, it's the reason we have age of consent laws.
No. 512167
File: 1581027568496.jpg (8.85 KB, 198x254, download (1).jpg)
>>512142>>512149>>512159Hebephilia is a rarely used word anyway, and the only people who use it are pedophiles who try to feel less guilty about jerking off to children, and always use it whenever someone talks about pedos…which you did the same thing.
You came here thinking people didnt know what hebephilia meant and have been sperging defending hepehbilia until you realized that these ''dumb wiminz'' actually know what that meant and are now trying to backpedal by pulling a ''full retard'' and pretending you had no idea what hebe meant even though its only used by pedophile activists.
And now you are trying to use another paraphilia just to defend men being attracted to minors for some strange reason.
>>512153No its because you were defending hepebhiles, which are men attracted to 11 year olds.
Also it is very strange that you are very hellbent on defending first hebephiles and then now ephebophilia.
Its almost like you might have a disgusting attraction that you are ashamed of and when the anons were talking about pedophilia you feelt personally attacked and started talking about hepe/ephobhiles and were so hellbent on defending them for some strange reason even though no one mentioned them……hmmmmm
No. 512175
>>512136Yes, that's what it means and what I said. I don't understand how you would think that pointing out the difference between the two terms correlates to endorsement of adults having sex with child or teenagers.
The constant accusations of scrote, pick me, handmaiden and troon every time there's a disagreement is what got these threads banned the last time. So either learn to read or ruin it for everyone else that's capable of having a discussion without baseless ad hominem.
No. 512176
>>512110>>512116>>512121>>512127>>512134>>512142>>512149>>512151>>512153>>512159>>512165>>512175Here are all of, pedo-chans spergs for the past hour.
Watch how they contradict themselves and backpedal.
Ignore them and report because its pointless arguing with them and dont feed their sperging
No. 512178
>>512174>Can't really call something paraphelic when every man has it.I get what you're saying. But also, can't you?
Does a majority will to do bad make the bad thing normal?
No. 512184
>>512181I mean, anon that's what normality means as a concept. You can try to change it through socialization, but the genetics are there. You can't make men not want to fuck teenagers.
>>512183People who equate natural with moral are retarded to begin with.
No. 512193
>>512189same thing when it comes to male teachers.
This is why i prefer female teachers,some of them may be bitchy but they dont try to fuck you.
Ive had three male teachers openly flirt with me and once it was so obvious that i felt disgusted because i never initiated anything with that person and he was older than my father
No. 512194
>>512188You're right, we don't have to accept it. We should start killing them for this. As another anon pointed out, no man could withstand the type of treatment they regularly subject women to.
inb4 cucked 'muh just as bad' moralfagging
No. 512196
>>512193samefag ot.
Once my male teacher called me ''princess'' in a flirty way.
What gives men the pass to behave this way?
No. 512198
>>512196The fact that we are not doing what this
>>512194anon suggests?
No. 512200
>>512190>it's illegal I'm not so sure that's really enforced…at all. If a man wants to sleep with a 15 year old no one bats an eye unless it pisses off the parents and they have a position of privilege to get the law involved which is time consuming and expensive. Most countries do not have ages of consent. And again, most people blame the teenagers anyway.
And this seems to be going way off the track from the original point that just because something is pervasive doesn't make it right.
I really don't care if the "majority" of men who fuck teens get grouped together with pedos. Guess they better work on healthy copes and suppressing those natty urges.
No. 512202
>>512200To be fair, I am talking about the west, where we have age of consent, usually 16 or 18.
Also, I am sorry but it's a cope to think men want or even can suppress those urges. They are who they are.
No. 512208
>>512202I didn't know the majority of men only occupy the west. Isn't that what we were talking about, almost all men? Why do you get to decide the region all of the sudden?
>where the age of consent is 16 or 18 Older men really don't have much business fucking a 16, 17, or even 18 year old. But to be fair I have a huge problem with society calling 18 year olds "adults" anyway.
>it's a cope to think men can suppress their urges Boys will be boys, huh?
Nah, these men continue to do what they do because society doesn't hold them to account. Because society claps for some old geezer who buys a 16 year old's ass.
You're excusing it with an appeal to nature and that's a fallacy.
No. 512210
>>512208>I didn't know the majority of men only occupy the west. Isn't that what we were talking about, almost all men? Why do you get to decide the region all of the sudden?Because I don't know what happens to the rest of the world?
>Older men really don't have much business fucking a 16, 17, or even 18 year old. But to be fair I have a huge problem with society calling 18 year olds "adults" anyway. I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere. 16-18 seems reasonable.
>Boys will be boys, huh? Yes, men will be men, violent sex crazed brutes. They might act as if they are not, but they absolutely are. I am not excusing them, I consider them trash.
No. 512213
>>512210The point being is that not only do you have a passive and defeatist attitude, but that same "Men can't change" line is in fact used by predators to justify their behaviors! Change happens when you stop being jaded and start calling the behavior out at every possible vector.
I'm not accepting this and this is the hill I will die on.
No. 512216
>>512213I literally told you all to not feed the sperg, this sounds like the previous sperg who was defending hebephiles/ephebhophiles.
How can we expect the spergs to go away when you all keep on feeding them, just ignore and report them sis
>>512210You just dont give up, dont you pedo/hebe-chan
No. 512219
>>512216I know this might blow your mind, but the conversation has continued past that issue. Also announcing a report etc.
>>512217I am at my late 20s actually and unfortunatelly had enough experiences to make me cynical.
No. 512226
>>511832My dad abused my mother when I was a kid and I ended up collecting shoujo manga as a preteen. I still play otome games and read romance lit now as an adult. Men may be shit, but men written by women are cute.
>>512103>>512107Great points.
No. 512232
>>512213>that same "Men can't change" line is in fact used by predators to justify their behaviors!…yeah, and that "men
can change" line is used to make women throw their lives away trying to fix worthless men. It's also been used to make liberal feminism revolve around the idea that males are bad because their mothers just didn't raise them to be good, #feminist men.
There's a lot of freedom to be gained by dispensing with the idea that there's anything to be done to fix men.
No. 512242
File: 1581034604054.jpg (30.7 KB, 500x496, dw.jpg)
>>512234You say "holding men accountable" like it's a viable course of action and like they're reasonable people capable of self-reflection and growth. You can't hold people accountable who have no accountability.
I don't say "men can't change" because I think they should be let off the hook, I say it because they will never improve, individually or as a group. They aren't gonna stop raping newborns and shooting up schools because somebody "held them accountable".
Men will never change. Live your life.
No. 512257
>>512242>Live your life.You mean, live our lives until we're raped and murdered (not necessarily in that order) by one of the many men left unchecked?
Even dogs can be trained, anon. There's no reason to believe men are exempt. They are teachable creatures, they've just been given too much leeway in life, and that needs to be tampered.
We'd still be living in caveman times if they were incapable of change. We wouldn't have gotten the chance to vote, go to school, use computers or do anything in any part of the world.
Progress is painfully slow, but it's not impossible.
No. 512261
>>512257Except women are almost in the exact same position since the existence of sexual dimorphism in homo sapiens.
Men can't be trained to do shit because they don't want to be trained and they are biologically incapable of doing so.
Women didn't fight for true emancipation and liberation, they fought for the "right" to vote, shop, work and live amongst the same beasts that kill and rape them.
No. 512264
>>512257Lol wtf? You think 'holding men accountable (whatever that means) stops rape? Most rapists are known to the
victim, it's way more logical to avoid men and live your life, become resource independent and not marry. You can't nag away biology, sorry.
No. 512265
File: 1581036921726.jpg (118.79 KB, 1300x955, couple-watching-television-bor…)
This is a gonna be a bit of a vent, I'm in kinda sorta fwb relationship with a scrote and I hate him so much, I hate his attitude, the way he dresses, his defeatist perspective on life and I hate the influence he has one me, when I'm with him his views start to infect me and I start giving up on everything I have planned and just end up watching tv with him or lying in bed with him, he brings out the absolute worst in me and yet I still have feelings for him, WTF is wrong with me
No. 512268
>>512254Baby Nigel will be different, you'll see.
>>512257>You mean, live our lives until we're raped and murdered (not necessarily in that order) by one of the many men left unchecked?Accepting that they can't overcome their true nature doesn't mean leaving them "unchecked".
>They are teachable creaturesMmmm… are they, though?
Yeah, just teach men not to rape. That'll work. Brilliant.
>We'd still be living in caveman times if they were incapable of change.Technological advancement is not the same thing as change. Men abused our female ancestors in every era, in every part of the world. They still do. They will until there are no humans left. Men just use new technology to harass/stalk/threaten/abuse in the same old ways.
No. 512281
>>512264No, I actually think amending certain rights is the solution. "Accountability" means nothing if you don't act in accordance to it. We can't keep acting as if it's safe to let men roam the streets freely, or to give them authority of any sort over women or children.
Men prove they can't be trusted the way women can, so it makes sense if they're given fewer freedoms from the jump. It's that simple. The sexes aren't equal, one is clearly more destructive and aggressive. We can only live in peace with them if we accept that.
That said, they can be trained to adapt to all sorts of things (see: the military, and some of the insanity they meme themselves into using porn alone), and they're very reactive to social conditioning.
If we can siphon political power from them slowly (and we have been bit by bit), I don't think it's impossible to enact in the next few generations. It should be "equality" on paper, and then we adapt the definition of equality to fit the capabilities and impulses of both sexes. As long as we keep handmaidens out of government, it's doable. It'd be great if we could just separate from them permanently, but not all of us are lesbians or bisexual. Plus, they'd just follow and try to destroy our havens, unless we prepared high-grade weaponry.
No. 512286
"Men won't change" posters are really no different than pickmes, tradthots, and coolgirls who don't do anything about the status quo yet are comfortable riding the coattails of women who were actually brave enough to stand up to men while acting like our rights to vote, own land, have a fair wage, seek education, and not be treated like property just materialized from ignoring men. We did not dismiss their actions as unchangeable to have got these victories.
Period.
>>512265Dick is abundant sis. Get a new fuck buddy.
No. 512289
>>512286Haha,
yeah. Saying that scrotes are incapable of meaningful improvement is
totally pick-me/tradthot behavior, suffragette-chan.
No. 512291
>>512261>>512268>Accepting that they can't overcome their true nature doesn't mean leaving them "unchecked". So, what do you suggest? The current system fails women, end of.
>Mmmm… are they, though? They literally train themselves and each other with orgasms, beatings and social pressures. I'm not even kidding here: It's free real estate. We just need the time, resources and energy, and I admit that those things are scarce right now.
>Yeah, just teach men not to rape. That'll work. Brilliant.Nah, castrate them, socially eviscerate and hang them if they rape, and avoid giving them the freedom that would allow them the opportunity to do so. Make rape socially synonymous with cannibalism. Right now, it's something that men think in the back of their minds is just "surprise sex".
>Technological advancement is not the same thing as change. Men abused our female ancestors in every era, in every part of the world. They still do. They will until there are no humans left. Men just use new technology to harass/stalk/threaten/abuse in the same old ways.I don't believe our female ancestors would look at this era and say "Everything is exactly the same". That's not what they worked hard for, and to claim we're in "almost the exact same position" we started at spits on literally everything they achieved. If they did nothing, technological advancements either wouldn't have ever been made (because the women who invented them would still be in shackles), or we wouldn't be talking to each other right now. This entire thread would just be scrotes posting scrote shit.
Some things are still similar to back then, but that's because this is still a work in progress. It's a matter of steering things in the correct direction, and doing our part of the work.
No. 512300
>>512291>Right now, it's something that men think in the back of their minds is just "surprise sex"Nah, they're aware of how vile and damaging it is. That's why they like it.
>castrate them, socially eviscerate and hang them if they rape, and avoid giving them the freedom that would allow them the opportunity to do soHow do you propose we go about doing that?
>I don't believe our female ancestors would look at this era and say "Everything is exactly the same"I didn't say they would. But women still suffer all over the world.
>>512293>Whatever makes you feel more comfortable for your inaction, keyboardchan.Tell me all about the thousands of men you've brought to justice whilst you educated third-world girls and found a cure for ovarian cancer, you absolute saint.
No. 512303
>>512300I quite literally shield women from men yelling insults and scripture at them in front of the family planning facility I volunteer for weekly and I get to radio for law enforcement if the men don't stay in their lane, it's a small justice.
I wasn't smart enough to find the cure for ovarian cancer though. Honestly the state of women's rights even in first world countries are a mess.
No. 512305
>>512300>Nah, they're aware of how vile and damaging it is. That's why they like it.To them, sex itself is meant to be vile and damaging. Anything else is an absolute gift to us, not the bare minimum, and that's the mindset we need to crush.
>How do you propose we go about doing that?See
>>512281. We play the long game, secure political power, introduce policies that work directly in women's interests, and make sure they can't stop us without shooting themselves in the foot, financially or politically. We need to put them in a corner. It's difficult, and may take a bit of playing dumb and handmaiden-LARPing when you get into certain inner circles, but it's our best chance. This is something that happens over the course of generations, too. That sort of "Live your life now, help women when you can, get your foot in the door to power where it's possible.
If (not when, if) you end up having daughters, tell them what's up and encourage them to venture where you couldn't, etc" thing.
>I didn't say they would. But women still suffer all over the world.This is true. What I'm saying is, it doesn't have to be this way forever. Reform is possible, just difficult.
No. 512332
>>512329I have known some butch lesbians who have great relationships with their fathers/brothers and have this almost pathologic hatred against their mothers and thus they view themselves more closer to men then women
>>512330not talking about FTMs I'm talking about actual female lesbians who are often misogynistic and cape for men
No. 512421
>>512394Even if a West African woman fits beauty standards, they typically try to find a way to insist she's not "really" what she is, her beauty must be from some non-black ancestry (however drowned out it is), or she must actually be from East Africa, lmao. I've seen it happen a lot, and have had men try to "compliment" me that way, whether or not I disclose my ancestry.
It's a vested interest in keeping certain groups of women at the bottom, and maintaining a hierarchy that keeps all women at each other's throats over "desirability".
Meanwhile, the truth is, men have no standards. They take what they're given. Their "opinions" on beauty belong directly in the trash. The only reason they're even able to make demands is because women are gracious enough to pander to them, but then they just raise the bar even higher in response.
No. 512423
>>512394>>512394I just love how they get all upset about black women having fake hair. If a black women decided to wear out her hair and it isn't s loose 3b texture, they will drag her and call it digusting and nappy.
My dad is mixed race and was born in Congo and he always said he would prefer me to marry a white man because i am sensitive and a black man would beat the shit at of me or take advantage if me if i am that way. At first i thought he was being racist, being he himself was not black passing and i was completely black. After spending time in the internet, hearing disgusting conversations by black men as they brag about adultery. They idolise cretins like future, who askde from making shit music, is out here fathering every instathots child and gets upset when people expect him to be seen as the
victim. My dad had a point. (Not saying white men are better, because it's clearly not true, i thnk i will remain a virgin for as long as possible).
No. 512446
>>512415Feeling bad about cheating as a woman is a meme.
Let's say you have a male. More likely than not, he regularly jerks off to an assortment of different women who look and act nothing like you, which is normal and acceptable male behavior in society. Any male would be livid if his girlfriend occupied her time with wading through pictures of differently colored and sized dicks while expecting to be doted on and coddled, yet as a woman you are expected to have warm fuzzy feelings about some pornsick cockchode.
The fact is, he is ejaculating to the idea of fucking other women, and he would act on it given the opportunity. A moid is only as loyal as his options. You on the other hand have all the options in the world, yet you choose to cuck yourself into not considering them because of obligation and guilt.
Tl;dr if you are moralfagging at yourself about "loyalty", you're clowning yourself.
No. 512464
>>512462Nobody "supports" cheating except neckbearded cucks living vicariously through "chads". I simply don't care if a woman cheats.
It's tragic when pickmes shun cheating women, basically just caping some dick they don't even know. Ultimate cuckqueen Becky move.
No. 512470
>>512446>>512415Men and women cheat for different reasons.
Generally speaking, men cheat due to opportunity and women cheat due to neglect. I think one wrong is more justified than the other. I'm typically suspicious of cheating men but sympathetic towards cheating women. Maybe I'm projecting, but of the times I was tempted to cheat, it was because my bf was being fucking horrible to me and being an emotional cheat himself. It felt good to fantasize about some more attractive man who would be exciting, who I wouldn't have to pick up after, and would at least act like he cared about my shit. When a woman wants to cheat that's the death spiral of that relationship. Unfixable.
A man cheats because a warm hole is presented to him and this puffs up his ego. He could have a beautiful, caring, and intelligent wife or gf back home but he'd sooner throw her under the bus if he felt like he had sexual options. He doesn't even care about his own side chick most the time, treats them like a disposable cumrag. This is why even models and the most perfect trad wives still deal with infidelity from these shitlords. Men cheat when the relationship is otherwise healthy. They also cheat over the slightest of slights. They cheat when their women are vulnerable and demanding, like when they're pregnant with his own child! They cheat just because, due to impulsivity and want for instant gratification.
I don't know if it needs to be said ladies, but just remember that men and society at large have no empathy for women who cheat. Not only is cheating emotionally and socially damaging for us (we actually feel guilt for cheating while men tend to be remorseless), there is actual danger. Many men are sexually possessive and aggressive. They'll beat you or maybe even kill you if they find out you've cheated. I have seen and dated men who got
abusive when they even accused without proof because they were that crazy jealous and projecting their own nefarious intents.
If you do this be discrete.
If you do this realize your relationship is doomed.
If you do this, dump him.
No. 512471
>>512463Does your bf know you're masturbating to pictures of your coworker and fantasizing about banging him? If so, you're an alpha Stacy, mad props to you.
But chances are, you're just coping with being cucked by telling yourself that his porn use is "impersonal" and "not the same as jerking to a real person". You won't even dare mention to him that you also fantasize about other men (you probably don't even do that).
No. 512472
>>512470>Maybe I am projectingYes, yes you are.
>If you do this, dump him.The only correct thing you said. Cheaters don't deserve to be in a relationship with the one they cheated on.
No. 512482
>>512478>I watch porn tooyes, was this forbidden in the last council meeting? Sorry I missed it.
>Surely he perceives porn the same way I doHe seems to, from the conversations we have had.
>No I don't masturbate to other menNo I don't actually, I prefer lesbian porn.
No. 512484
>>512482>Believing what a man says about his own porn usemy fucking sides
don't forget to post in this thread when he starts sugaring ethots with money from your joint bank account
No. 512492
>>512487
>muh moral high groundPeak pickme or a butthurt moid larping as one.
Imagine posting about cheating men on any male forum and getting anything but cheering and "based alpha Chad" in response. I can't even begin to imagine what it's like to whiteknight men for enduring stuff they not only overlook but encourage when it's done to women.
No. 512494
File: 1581093007349.jpeg (36.83 KB, 567x385, EJxHIQYWoAEsLAk.jpeg)
>>512487>Your tone was extremely sympathetic to women cheatingWhat gave it away dumbass? The part where I explicitly said it? Piss.
>>512489I said the reasons for women cheating tend to be more understandable and sympathetic, yes. I'm not changing my mind for you.
Society IS more lenient about men cheating. I'm not gonna withhold observations because it offends your fragile sensitivities.
No. 512497
File: 1581093177806.jpg (74.14 KB, 545x568, IMG_20200207_113339.jpg)
>"society" is somehow more lenient towards men cheating than they are women
>implying it isn't
This has to be a scrot, or we're approaching pickmeisha levels never thought possible.
No. 512500
>>512493It just makes me wonder why we continue to give them the benefit of the doubt.
What is the point? They spit in our faces time and time again. If anon wants to cheat and post her personal manifesto for it, whatever, honestly. But other anons are really defending the feelings of this hypothetical male they don't know out of pure empathy and kindness that 99% of the time simply wouldn't be returned. For what purpose? It's admirable, but why even?
No. 512503
>>512496Lmao. Your man is part of the "decent 10%" up until he cheats on you. There's no way to map em sis, they can cheat all across spectrums of socioeconomic backgrounds, personalities, and ages. The only way you'll know you've had a decent man is the one who's never done anything wrong into old age, and even then you might not be aware if he's successfully kept shit secret.
>>512498Not all sins are equal. You're not going to change anyone's mind about this so why don't you stop infighting and leave?
No. 512505
>>512499yes, most men are trash, we know
>>512500I was one of the anons calling her out and it wasn't in defense of her hypothetical man. It was because the action itself is disgusting and her doing it makes her disgusting. As I said, we are better than them, if we act like them then we stop being better.
>>512502If you act like them then you become like them, how is this not true?
>>512503It's true that judging them can be difficult, but it's not like we can do anything else, those of us that are straight at least.
>Not all sins are equalYes, but the ones that are literally the same are.
No. 512506
File: 1581093793123.jpg (26.79 KB, 640x640, Women-Sexy-Killer-Scary-Clown-…)
>>512500Virtue signalling to an imaginary male for good girl points. The absolute state of pickmes.
(infighting) No. 512509
File: 1581093966618.gif (1.72 MB, 480x270, giphy.gif)
>steal a loaf of bread
>steal someone's life savings
>scrote/pickmeisha logic will argue the crimes are the same because they're both taking property
Is this the brain on porn?
No. 512513
>>512510Yeah a man cheating on his pregnant wife because he finds her body repulsive, she's too tired to cook, and is in pain is totes the same as a woman cheating on a man because he's a neglectful prick.
Ha.
Ha. Ha.
Ha. Muh equal objectivity!
No. 512514
>>512505Do you even pinkpill? You must be new.
You'll never be like them because sexual reproduction is inherently asymmetrical. Female sexual behavior and male sexual behavior will never be equivalent even if you engage in acts that are "exactly the same" in the dictionary. There's a reason why casual sex and hookups don't have equivalent consequences, benefits and social perception for men and women. To pretend otherwise is a maladaptive cope.
You will never out-trash a man even if you actively try to. That said, on some level pickmes need to exist in order for high value women to thrive, so you do you.
No. 512515
>>512512Back to the radfem thread, I watch stuff that I like for free, I don't pay for them. I don't contribute one bit.
>>512513>Look at this imaginary scenario I made in my head, how can you challenge this?By saying it's an imaginary scenario you made in your head.
>>512514Not sure what you mean anon
> Female sexual behavior and male sexual behavior will never be equivalent even if you engage in acts that are "exactly the same" in the dictionary. There's a reason why casual sex and hookups don't have equivalent consequences, benefits and social perception for men and womenyeah I know that, but when did I deny that?
No. 512520
>>512507Yes, empathy gap is real. It causes women to feel bad for their abusers, for instance. You're arguing that this is what women should continue doing because it makes them "better people", which is some kind of reward in itself to you. Admirable, but #cantrelate.
Pinkpill isn't about being a good girl, it's about doing what's best for yourself and other women even if it's not "fair", "equal" or "feminist". If having a principle against cheating makes you happy, good for you. But policing other women is basically doing scrots' job for them.
No. 512522
>>512505>It was because the action itself is disgusting and her doing it makes her disgusting. As I said, we are better than them, if we act like them then we stop being better.This is close to outright saying "Sure, I'm being fucked over left and right, but you know what? I have the moral high ground ;)".
I don't think it's good to cheat, but I find it very hard to care anymore if a man gets cheated on, unless I already know him and believe him to be a good person.
Cheating is disgusting because it hurts the partner. That said, do men, as a collective, even process emotional pain the same way women do, or just narcissistic rage? Individual ones might, but the vast majority don't seem to.
In 2020, why should we be carrying men's stress as if it were our own? They wouldn't shoulder our burdens, so why perpetuate the imbalance? To make it that much clearer we're better people (as if there aren't already countless examples)? It makes no sense to me.
No. 512524
>>512520They're defending men. That's what they're doing. That's why even though they claim they're not scrotes they're somehow bothered by the fact that we see male infidelity as worse when our views aren't even their business.
They're pissed because we are not keeping in line.
No. 512525
>>512522Anon, you can dislike (hell I do) men as a group but still be empathetic to individuals. You sounds like the russian peasants's rationalization of hatred for their middle class.
>>512524>They're defending men.No, we are first of all holding women accountable and secondary and incidentally defending innocent men.
>when our views aren't even their business. You are posting in a public forum…
No. 512526
File: 1581095497334.png (92.69 KB, 640x540, cheating1new-w640.png)
>>512523>not assuming every man deserves to be mistreatedThey wouldn't do the same for you, sisterhood. Go police men, not us. Men are statistically more likely to cheat so they're the ones who need to be moralfagged.
No. 512527
>>512525>innocent menlmak
all men engage in infidelity ideation but they totes wouldn't act on it if they had the opportunity
this is pinkpilled now
No. 512528
>>512525>Anon, you can dislike (hell I do) men as a group but still be empathetic to individuals. You sounds like the russian peasants's rationalization of hatred for their middle class.I already made an exception for individuals, if you read my post. Twice, even.
So, who is the individual in the cheat-anon's hypothetical case? What makes them worth defending?
No. 512531
>>512526Anon, I have said many times in this thread that I consider most men trash and worse than us. I just don't think this justifies throwing them all under the bus.
>>512527>all men engage in infidelity ideation but they totes wouldn't act on it if they had the opportunityEveryone has fantasies you know, it's what they do that matters.
>>512528The spouse? What makes them worth defending is the same thing that makes anyone worth defending, cheating on someone means that the person cheating is trash, it doesn't say anything about the one getting cheated on. I didn't start this conversation to defend men, but to call out cheat-anon.
>>512530I treat them way worse when they defend cheating, thank you very much.
No. 512533
>>512531>The spouse? What makes them worth defending is the same thing that makes anyone worth defending, Men aren't just anyone, even you've admitted it.
>cheating on someone means that the person cheating is trash, it doesn't say anything about the one getting cheated on. I didn't start this conversation to defend men, but to call out cheat-anon.Why should we care? Why should we call cheat-anon out? Who is she hurting, except a man who is highly likely to be an even bigger piece of trash? What is the point?
No. 512535
>>512531Implying male and female fantasies are the same when you agreed above that male and female sexualities are not the same.
What they do is meaningless in this case because by nature men can't have as much sex or variety as they'd like. Men are not the sex that gets to choose. It's like thinking about screwing children but not doing it because it's illegal - the dude is still a pedo.
If your Nigel could bone that chick from that "impersonal" pornhub video and get to keep you at the same time, he would.
No. 512536
>>512525>You are posting in a public forumThis is actually a thread with rules about infighting and a scope of discussion that you are systematically going against because you want to get on your soapbox about defending men.
This isn't a safespace for your freedom of speech, you're the one who replied to an opinion you didn't agree with and now you're stubbornly derailing after multiple anons have told you why you're being stupid and don't belong here.
Pet peeve, holy shit.
No. 512538
>>512533Anon, what's the point of anything? We are sitting in front of our computers and talking on an obscute internet imageboard, there is no point. My reasoning is that you shouldn't treat people based on what you think they might be like based on their group. Yes the average man is worse than the average woman. That doesn't mean all women are better than all men. If I know nothing about them, as any imaginary example goes, I assume they are ok and normal people.
>>512535Anon, my Nigel has refused a threesome with another girl because he didn't want to endanger our emotional connection, trust me when I say that people's sexuality is complicated and not so cut and dry.
>>512536Calling you out for being a cheater is not infighting or against any rules or theme of the thread. Cheaters are scum, period. Also I am not the only one who disagrees with you.
No. 512539
>>512538>calling you out for being a cheater I've never cheated.
You "called me out" for the AUDACITY of saying I empathise with women who cheat over men because their situations are more sympathetic to me. You're a piece of shit.
No. 512540
>>512538okay, great. don't do it in this thread. no one cares if you're offended on behalf of men.
>>512539they are undoubtedly more sympathetic. they typically cheat for entirely different reasons.
No. 512542
>>512537Why did I hit reply? I meant arguing about cheating wont work, because in the end it's all subjective. You don't want to cheat because you might cheat on the mythical and perfect 1% that would never hurt you? Fine. You don't want to hurt others no matter who they are? Fine.
Most of us aren't saints and don't try to act like one. Though it's hard to make a case for cheating, just break up. If you want to be a edgy kid and break teh rulez? Fine. I won't chastise you about it but I do have to call you an underage
No. 512546
File: 1581096692999.gif (113.92 KB, 320x600, giphy (1).gif)
>>512541Then go be with your ilk of innocent babby men who tell you they'd never cheat uwu.
You're not gonna make us feel bad or change minds. Shoo.
No. 512547
>>512544They are not all cheaters anon… Way more of them are cheaters than women, that doesn't mean they are all cheaters, please, I am getting tired of basically saying "stop generalizing, it is not factual or correct".
>>512546I don't think I can change your mind, I care about the lurkers though. These opinions should not go unchallenged and just be swallowed.
No. 512550
Men cheat more than women but cheating is entitled scumbag behavior no matter who is doing it. I wish the femdom enthusiasts and degenerate cheaters would stop hijacking the thread.
Defending infidelity by saying "men do it so why shouldn't I?" is beyond pointless. Men don't wash their asses, should women also not wash their asses in the name of equality?
>>512546You do realize that getting back at men by fucking a whole bunch of men isn't, like, a brilliant plan, right?
Yeah, you totally showed all those nasty scrotes by fucking them with no strings attached. I'm sure they're crying themselves to sleep every night.
No. 512557
>>512550Implying fucking other men is motivated by "getting back" at them. I've personally never cheated, but I will if I find another man attractive or useful. It's simple utility.
Not surprised you can't imagine doing anything that isn't for men somehow.
No. 512579
>>512526This is self reported. Given that men lie more, you can safely assume that the male percentage is greater.
The widening gap can be explained in two ways. Men are proven to cheat more when they start experiencing a physical decline, realizing their own mortality. They cheat to prove to themselves that they're still functional as a sentient sperm sack, since this is their entire purpose.
But another fact is that a married man's options increase with age and a married woman's are diminished, which has little to do with her age or appearance. Men benefit more from marriage, which typically increases their net worth. A woman is thoroughly immersed in caretaking, which typically results in her no longer seeing herself as a sexual being or having time for anything other than doting over her screeching family. Instead, a man gets more free time because he's being cared for.
A man's greater resources and time expand his options beyond what was available to him during youth, so he starts doing what he always wanted to do but couldn't.
No. 512601
File: 1581100854622.jpg (424.83 KB, 1440x2295, 20200207_133936.jpg)
Imma be single forever because I'm ugly and every man born after 1985 is a cum brain who cant differentiate porn from reality :(
I'm so tired of bring asked to be in poly relationships lol
No. 512609
>>512596It is definitely a butthurt scrot shill. This thread probably made him imagine prepping Tyrone to fuck his waifu pillow, followed by a shameful orgasm, immense self hatred and coping.
>epick levels of fidelity anxiety>absolutely unable to defend male hypocrisy>"I've never paid for porn so it's not exploitative">incoherent autistic rage>only men of some other race commit rape>m-men bad amirite guise?Pickmes and scrots have their distinct ways of hand flailing over cheating, and this is definitely a bootybothered scrot, anxious yet aroused over being deceived about his hypothetical paternity. Female infidelity never fails to get to them because they secretly find it exciting.
I can't imagine how enlarged and throbbing the prostates must be at whatever /r9k/ thread they're coming from.
No. 512611
File: 1581101796012.jpg (646.09 KB, 2481x1702, thomas-middleditch-wife-mollie…)
>>512601i love that these shrimpdicked squirrel brains think so highly of themselves. never speak to this dumbass again, anon.
anyways, so that brings me to something that has been irritating me: don't date down. men do not appreciate it or care for you. thomas middleditch looks like a legitimately wall-eyed 18th century ghoul, has the least attractive vibe and personality ever, managed to marry a woman way out of his league, and this is what he has to say about their marriage:
>Middleditch told the pub that he broached the subject of seeing other people when he felt like he was going to either have to try it out or end their marriage.
>“I don’t know how much I can say, because I don’t want my wife to be mad at me,” he said. “Only after I got married was I like, ‘Mollie, I’m sorry, but we have to get nontraditional here.’ To her credit, instead of saying ‘F–k you, I’m out,’ she was like, ‘Let’s figure this out.’”
>He said that sex is still somewhat of a point of contention in their marriage, but that the decision to open it up salvaged their relationship.
>“To be honest, swinging has saved our marriage,” he said. “We have different speeds, and we argue over it constantly, but it’s better than feeling unheard and alone and that you have to scurry in the shadows. By the way, it’s now called being ‘part of the lifestyle.’ The term swinging is old. If that’s part of your being and it feels important to you, find a way to explore it, because repression sucks. But it’s a perpetual state of management and communication, to the point where it’s like, ‘All right, we’ve got to stop. Chill.’ I’m gas, and she’s brakes.”and i've heard this same bullshit from numerous men i've known. "i can't be repressed!!". great, so just publicly and openly emotionally abuse your partner for your gain because that's all that matters. every single time it's obvious it's killing the women but these men are happy and that's all that matters. and yet this shit will be portrayed positively by media while these women are clearly suffering, but female suffering matters not. male happiness is all that matters
>>512596really can't assume it's a male. seems male, but there are actually a lot of very misled women out there, especially ones that visit the chans. it's a tough one being that we have no information about other posters and that certain women are deeply brainwashed. the women in my family are the same way and genuinely read as male often. it's sad.
No. 512617
File: 1581102492677.jpg (416.85 KB, 1410x2276, 20200207_140834.jpg)
>>512611Well he told me I'm not what hes looking for lol
No. 512619
File: 1581102869113.jpg (172.44 KB, 2560x1600, 52930.jpg)
>>512607
Male sexuality is exploitative and they accurately perceive it as such. Giving a man sex is a "loss" on your part in his mind, and becoming pair bonded with him for nothing in return is straight up evidence of you being a clown.
Males perceive unconditional commitment/fidelity from more attractive women as evidence that the woman is retarded/actually undesirable and unattractive. From a male perspective, getting a woman is a form of duping her. They also loathe themselves, so by loving an ugly man unconditionally you just become a "woman who loves disgusting shit". This also induces delusions of desirability in men - they begin to think that if they were able to secure a hot chick, they surely can do better. This scenario can be avoided if your commitment is conditional and the male is subtly reminded that you have a plethora of other options, e.g. when he supports you financially and you are not trying your hardest to signal that you're off market to other males. If he's never certain that you are secured, he will not develop delusions of desirability. "She's with me because I'm awesome" becomes a cope, not a genuine belief.
If this woman's approach was "we both fuck whoever we want, I no longer fuck you, you are paying my bills", he would be singing a very different tune.
No. 512621
File: 1581103136213.jpg (230.67 KB, 919x1300, water-cooler-conversation-9369…)
>>512410>>512282the thing is compared to everyone I work with I hate him the least, like I actually despise all the dumb boomers and libfems that I'm forced to interact with everyday and he's the only one I can vent 100% of my real thoughts without any fear of negative social consequences, eventually this venting and occasional hanging out resulted into a kinda sorta fwb relationship, and I don't know what to
No. 512622
>>512621>fucking a cuck you vent towew lad
this is like reverse friendzoning
No. 512623
>>512601>>512617You should've crushed this guy imo. You were way too chill and nice.
>I agree that sex is easy to get, but quality sex is hard Lmao @ this scrote lying through his teeth. He has zero game and clearly doesn't fuck. I bet if you were a dumb pickme willing to agree he'd just ask if you had an attractive bi friend to drag along into the dark triad relationship.
The audacity.
No. 512629
>>512611I like how his "rules" is that they have to do these together, which basically means that he fucks and she watches. The ugly moid knows that if it becomes an actual open relationship, as in each party can do what they want, she'll find someone hotter and richer in about a week and that'll be the end.
Unrelated, but male comedians are always fugly. No wonder they become "funny" to compensate.
No. 512634
>>512623This shit makes me so angry. I don’t really subscribe to polyamory, but the concept of it pretty much to men is not like, “I have the capacity to love and care for more than one person in a relationship dynamic” but it’s more like “can I convince two females to fuck me and each other and idc who they are” like how do you outright tell people that’s what you want when you’re just meeting them? You’re setting it up for failure right then and there.
>I just want to fuck two random bi females Not even entertaining the fact that you should maybe date them first or develop feelings. Just recruiting random faceless women into your stupid games. I hate cumbrains.
No. 512650
>>512634Yeah when a scrote says he's poly and wants a threesome he actually means he wants to fuck multiple women while they remain sexually exclusive to only him.
They NEVER want it to mean that the woman gets to introduce multiple men, who may be more attractive and have larger dicks, into the relationship to fuck while the men stay sexually exclusive to her.
We know what's up.
No. 512654
File: 1581107953539.png (180.98 KB, 680x512, 554.png)
I once heard of a guy in harmontown who claimed to be poly. Except later clarified that his form of poly only with women, he could date other girls and so could his gf. Instant impression upgrade from sad cuck its awkward to listen to to god tier Chad
Just a reminder that if you agree to an open relationship with a foid, you will lose. The sex related demand imbalance in the dating market is such that a foid literally just has to make it known that an actual, real vagina is present in order to get a thousand chads tripping over each other fighting for her hand. On the other hand, you will receive no messages, and if you send one, your will not get a reply. If Johnny Depp decided to try an open relationship with a downs land whale, uncompensated sex would immediately stop being a thing for him, and also he'd have to retire from acting to deal with the full time janitorial duties of mopping up and sanitizing the cum flowing out of her vagina from the endless stream of chads lined up outside her bedroom of all hours of the day.
Yes, I have become an incel.
Seriously guys though, it's literally just a warm hole, can't we make like a sex union or something, like a dick OPEC, and regulate the supply of dick to bring its value on the market somewhere more on par with vagina. Or is that beyond us and we're doomed to just compulsively spam dick pics to every std negative foid greater than a 3 within a thousand miles in the vain hopes of getting a bite, thus flooding the market with dick so that it becomes totally devalued and vag is thus totally out of reach of the common moid. Divided, the foid reigns supreme, but united our dicks will become jewels bestowed only upon the worthy.
We may need to bring out powered up 1 year no relapse nofappers to teach the occasional chad scab a lesson, they will soon learn their lesson and be kept in line. And for especially tough ur-chads, there is undoubtedly a supply of man maids in our community who've sustained their chastity and virtue for the 30 requisite years necessary to gain wizard powers. An embarrassingly large supply, but a supply nonetheless. One day we may even breed the 30 year old neverfapped man maid of myth, hopefully at that time we have grown wise enough to handle such power responsibly though.(male posting)
No. 512668
File: 1581109136480.png (130.25 KB, 1271x272, serious delusion.PNG)
They're so detached from reality. Imagine being so fucked in the head that you think the women on lolcow are more evil than the men on chanboards. Men are irredeemable liars, they are always intellectually dishonest. If it isn't their goal to be intellectually dishonest, they're plain testerical and dangerous, and should never be listened to.
No. 512674
>>512668This screenshot reads so pathetic, omfg. The second someone is loud with their distate for men, especially chan incels
oof the tears.
No. 512675
>>512668They're just whining because how dare a small corner on the internet not be for them!
Whining about empathy and hostility…yeah sure. When I was on 4chan the other day some scrote posted a webm of a man abusing multiple babies. Grabbing their heads until they cried, smacking them, throwing them, and roughing them up in general. We're more cruel than baby abusers? Nah.
Not to mention the various pics, gifs, and webms of animal abuse and gore that they readily share and comment on.
Race baiting isn't even allowed here, and most libfem places on the internet hate racism too.
Know what has racism aplenty? 4chan.
But yeah, we're the worst /s
No. 512676
File: 1581109906677.png (824.89 KB, 1000x563, Windows7_2018Edition_Wallpaper…)
>>512668Moids are naturally more fragile, self centered and generally incapable of objective threat perception. They also lack theory of mind. Any woman who wastes her time being "fair" to them is clowning herself, because the moid moral baseline is inherently tipped in their favor.
A moid thinks him getting a papercut is equivalent to a woman getting beheaded. It's anything but surprising that per scrotal logic, a place where people liveblog necrophiliac acts and share child pornography is worse than a board where someone doesn't give a shit about some hypothetical woman cheating somewhere.
No. 512678
>>512676>A moid thinks him getting a papercut is equivalent to a woman getting beheaded. They have a lower pain threshold and a lower tolerance to handle discomfort in general. It's just a result of them being coddled into adulthood, whereas women are told to stop being sensitive and self-soothe.
Men think being abused in a relationship is not being served dinner.
No. 512683
>>512678Boys mature slower physically, socially, and linguistically.
Stress-regulating brain circuitries mature slower in boys prenatally, perinatally, and postnatally.
Boys are affected more negatively by early environmental stress, inside and outside the womb, than are girls. Girls have more built-in mechanisms that foster resiliency against stress.
It's not just socialization, males are simply naturally weaker and women are raised to partake in their self congratulatory LARP-posturing called "masculinity". It's all about maintaining the appearance of toughness of course, since they're not really equipped to truly meet their self imposed masculine criteria of bravery and valor. In practice it falls apart, like the Titanic "women and children first" fiasco.
It's kind of like a narcissist's false self - very hard to maintain without an outside spectator pretending that the emperor isn't naked (performing femininity).
No. 512684
File: 1581111236290.jpg (591.64 KB, 1080x2220, Screenshot_20200207-102041_Red…)
Imagine if this is the anon ITT who was trying to argue that it's okay and not cheating for her boyfriend to watch porn.
No. 512689
>>512684Peak cuckolded Reddit pickme cope. No wonder that most women who watch porn are not single. Her next post will be "I don't care that he's fucking my best friend in my bed as long as he's honest about it and I get to prep her gash for him".
Also, lmak @ the idea that acknowledging that porn use is cheating ideation = caring about it or wanting it to stop. While it would probably matter to a bill splitting bangmaid, a woman who entered a monogamous marriage for pinkpilled reasons would probably be thrilled to use infidelity as ammo in a fault divorce, or at the very least as an excuse to not put out anymore.
No. 512693
>>512685women survive because theyre smarter than men.
And the "women and children" thing is a myth lol
No. 512697
File: 1581112831069.jpeg (305.46 KB, 1061x858, 06E50841-66F6-4DD4-8165-F58DDE…)
My heart breaks for all the women in this article, the author and the comments, and even more so when I realise my experience seems to be pitifully common.
Why are we as women so willing to try to forgive when men inflict so much suffering
http://neshamas.com/husband-raped-stayed/ No. 512698
>>512684>>512689Just wait a while until she finds those nofap subs and discover that men do prefer porn over her and her kind of pick mes no matter how much "communication" they have. Because men fucking admit it themselves. It's just sad how these guys will say that they began to hate and judge their girlfriends from it over time until they couldn't find them attractive. Then these girls will
still say how women are just insecure uwu from porn and need therapy if they don't like it.
No. 512700
>>512575millions of male rapists and male murderers every year. Cant say the same shit about women.
stfu moid
No. 512702
>>512698Based Lundy Bancroft explains how "communication" always ends up benefitting moids because it simply teaches them to appropriate therapy lingo to push their own interests. Taking males (especially
abusive ones) to marital counseling is basically shooting yourself in the foot.
>>512695The Titanic where the captain threatened to shoot men? Of course.
No. 512708
>>512684>medication for depression I wonder if this woman's depression is clouding her thought process while the medication is numbing down any kind of emotions that would elicit feelings of disrespect and emotional pain?
Would explain why she's ~coolio~ about her man watching porn.
>I'm just not up for the task sometimes Okay but does a man REALLY need to ejaculate in order to function? Why can't he just control his sexual urges until she's ready? Why can't he do something thoughtful or put her needs first so that she's more likely to be in the mood?
She must be depressed. She sees herself as a cum dump and so forgives her man for seeking alternatives. She's putting him before herself.
>I do not care if he gets off to a girl on screen as long as he is open and honest Doesn't she realize he's not telling her every time he watches porn, and probably isn't honest about the more degenerate shit he watches? She prefers for him to cheat with permission I guess.
>porn helps our sex life so we know what we like and opens our communication But she could have this without porn! How does she think people had sex and talked about it before pornos were a thing? Omg.
>other girls are insecure and have trust issues Because "the screen" is a very fragile degree of separation of your man from another woman.
Many men become pornsick and will eventually escalate their desires until they're cheating behind your back with real women they solicit on the internet, likely from the same places where they honeypot porn.
>he's just gonna watch porn behind her back anyway And this is the gold standard of trust and communication?! This woman actually accepts this behavior.
Simple thought experiment that debunks the disrespect of porn:
A man invites a couple over to his house behind his gf or wife's back. He found them on the internet, the woman is his sexual ideal. He tells them to start fucking and to perform all the kinks he is into. He promises them money in exchange and also that he won't interfere, he's just to watch. While the couple is fucking, he is watching and stroking his cock. He imagines that he is the man doing all of the stuff to the idealistic woman until he orgasms. The couple leaves.
>"Omg that's so perverted and he is definitely cheating on his gf/wife! How disrespectful!" Okay, but now imagine that instead of inviting them to the house, that he's watching them from behind a screen but still fantasizing of fucking any woman except his gf/wife and doing the things she hasn't done or can't realistically do.
>"Oh, um, well actually…b-but it's just porn! You must be insecure and have trust issues!!!" People who argue that it's okay because it's "behind the screen" are deluding themselves. Let us not even talk about butthurt insecure a man would get if he found out his woman was looking up porn of mega dicks and wonder if she's actually satisfied with his 3 inch slim jim.
People have been pornwashed.
No. 512726
>>512708My favorite meme is women buying into the impersonal porn meme.
Porn is anything but impersonal for men, that's the whole point of porn. It's been proven that they perceive it as "real".
Double kek when it escalates into POV and eventually beta orbiting actual camgirls on Snapchat.
No. 512730
File: 1581118892454.jpg (564.02 KB, 800x1040, 01_237a.jpg)
>>512718Kek, I rub my unrealistic preferences for model twinks in my moids' faces all the time. When they object I tell them that they're insecure and need therapy. It's hilarious how approval seeking they become.
No. 512771
>>512718I had an ex who got butt hurt about me jokingly calling a very nice piece of architecture as 'sexy,' meanwhile he'd comment on how attractive my friends were all the time. I guess he was worried I was objectumsexual and was gonna cheat on him with a cathedral or something lmao
Glad I realized I'm a lesbian.
No. 512772
File: 1581128001943.jpeg (725.9 KB, 1920x1368, 1_gpJ4O7gRQC1RlzvY1JIm1g.jpeg)
>>512622that's the real issue, were not even friends, I just can't get along with other people or make normal friends so he's the only option I have and I hate that fact
No. 512773
>>512718My ex would get butthurt over me wearing yoga pants (despite me wearing them because I’ll workout that day) while he watched porn at least once or twice a day to women with huge tits.
He’d also get salty when I grew my butt and got a better body at the gym because guys would look at me despite him looking at a bunch of gross porn or anime porn all the time. I wish I had the guts to do a slutty cosplay in public just to make him feel an ounce of pain that I felt from his pornsickness.
No. 512791
>>512753<3
>>512772You're basically paying a man with sex for his company. You can do much better than this. Tons of orbiters will listen to your venting without ever getting any.
He's likely only acting cool to continue getting his dick wet. Stop fucking him and see what happens.
No. 512797
>>512794You just need to be more social, and not necessarily in a party Stacy way.
Try Bumble or Tinder, or Bumble BFF for female friends. Meet people through mutual hobbies. You're a woman, the only reason why you don't have orbiters is because you self-isolate. You can also easily find a fuck buddy with some resemblance of actual benefits, as in he pays for your company in one way or another.
It's easy to believe that you're chained to the same dick forever if you choose to believe that only he can understand you. Believe me, your oneitis will be cured once you start talking to other people.
No. 512887
>>512885Maybe try not being such a carnal beast that is so easily pacified by base desires.
Start investing in skill training, rhetoric debate, studying philosophy, improving the physical fitness of your body, literally anything else.
Stop being a slave.
No. 512903
>>512892>>512900Yeah I'm sure he's so tortured and thinks the sex "was just for you."
Did not benefit him at all whatsoever. Lol. Stop being had. This is really embarrassing…
>>512895Maybe if you laugh at his dick? But how could anon even pull that sort of thing now after fucking him without complaint for so long?
Other than that, nah, and especially not in this situation as anon described. This guy doesn't even care that anon is fucking other dudes and actually went multiple months ignoring her. Anon is just trying to save face to turn this whole situationship where she debased herself into an elaborate scheme to hurt the male.
Except, plot twist: This guy doesn't give a fuck either way.
It's mental. Anon thinks she'll find this surefire way to verbally beatdown this guy, but more than likely he will just act smug. He'll treat anon like she's being a crazy obsessed slut. And tbh, this is super obsessive so he would be right!
No. 512907
>>512900>>512905Nah, stop playing his games. It just sounds like you're on some kind of "tsundere" thing. The problem is that this isn't an anime, and he sounds like an annoying person, so all of this is just embarrassing.
You're wasting your time and making every excuse in the world to justify it, anon. It sounds more and more like you actually just want to impress him, thinking he'll fall to the knees in awe of your intellect and start treating you well. Or, you might have started sleeping with him as a form of self-harm, and now you want to "take back your power", but without the hard work of changing your bad habits. It's not going to happen. Some people are just assholes, and they aren't worth your time. All you can do with wasted time is learn to make better choices.
You can either keep rewarding his poor behavior with sex (no matter how much you claim the sex is for your benefit), or you can leave his
toxic ass behind to wither.
No. 512909
>>512905If I insulted you over the internet would you care? Of course you wouldn't, people insult you all the time online. Of course he would give a shit if a person who he cares for or who he knows that cares for him said that. The things you do have no weight in them because you're that kind of a person. You can't hurt him no matter you do because of who you are.
How can you be so out of the loop on how humans work?
No. 513109
File: 1581240415338.png (1.35 MB, 961x475, Creole-Day.png)
>>513100eh I'm black and I probably hate black men far more then white men, cause their the one's directly oppressing, abusing and raping black women, I hate white men too but too a lesser extent, so its understandable why white women would hate white men more then black men, though black men aren't any better, that being said both "white" and "black" are very dumb terms to describe race in america, because both "black" and "white" cultures, languages and even genetics vary widely across america, the culture and linguistics of blacks in louisiana is different from "black" culture and linguistics in Atlanta, similarly "whites" in the midwest who are mainly german descended have different cultures then the culture of the mainly english/scottish "white" people of the south, and even in the south it varies widely
No. 513112
>>513100in writing
>>513080 i feel like i somewhat shallowly touched on that subject when talking about the violence during the LA riots. it was obviously racially fueled, but during the doc i couldn't help but equate the excessive violence with men. i think most problems can be attributed to males rather than specific races. but that's just me.
No. 513115
>>513100a white man is statistically more violent than a woman of any race. i believe sex is a better determinant for being a shitty person than race, and from personal experience, i've been proven right every single time.
>What about criminals? Do you see them as of lesser worth than us normals?imo it depends on their crime. it's too broad a stroke to lump all criminals together. a child rapist isn't on the same level as someone who smoked marijuana.
i think we can all agree the former is absolutely worth less than other humans, while the latter isn't really. being a criminal is more of an individual case.
No. 513145
>>513100I have no clue what disliking men has to do with race. I hate all men equally anon! And support all woman equally. But seriously I could give a fuck about race, as a white woman I feel obligated to not count black men into my hatred though because I have privilege over them, seeing as my ancestors par took in the enslavement of them. I just ignore black male existence because any criticism I might have will definitely be seen as a race issue even if it’s not. I do think rap music and hip hop culture puts woman down horribly, doesn’t seem very woman friendly but that’s not my deal, I shouldn’t intrude on their spaces. All natives HATE white people and I just let em do it, they deserve to we took their whole existence so I don’t give a fuck if a native tried to harm me, cause I feel like I deserve it. Idk maybe as a white woman I know everyone hates me and I just take it because we deserve it????? Idk idk idk. White men are the only thing we’re allowed to hate and maybe that’s why we hate them SOO much??????? (I mean they deserve it but do we put it all on them type of thing) I guess I just ignore all other races of men but my own.
With criminals, again, depends on crime. If you raped a child, I believe you should be castrated. Hell, all rapists should be castrated but than it makes it too easy for us to lie against men we just don’t like. There’s no real way to deal with criminals. Everyone’s done something illegal.
No. 513172
>>513100Men of every race hate women, anon. However, since I'm white, I'm only going to shit on white men out loud because otherwise the intersectionals will dismiss all other criticisms as racism. And it's better for the women of other races to speak out about the problems within their own race anyway.
But black men, asian men, middle eastern men, they all hate women.
But white men hate women and tend to, in my society, have power over all the rest of those groups. So it's easier to criticize white men in that regard. But no race is unique in that misogyny.
But I really and don't think any race is worse than the other. It's gender that's the problem.
No. 513174
>>513100I personally can’t see the issue with (some) criminals because I feel like the justice system has failed Us anyway.
I think that sometimes I say things that make people think I’m racist usually when it’s quoting statistics about racial groups that commit crimes against women and children (aka all men lmao but also it varies from race to race) but in reality and in general I think that all men are the problem.
No. 513176
>>513158….why do men have to talk about tings that should be private to strangers/acquaintances/friends.
Like who tf tells their co-worker that their gilrfriend has a hairy butthole.
What is wrong with men?
No. 513203
>>513100>What about criminals?Depends on the crime. Petty misdemeanors that happened years ago and particularly in youth, sure I'll forgive that. I still wouldn't want to get involved with felons. Why would any woman with value go after a man who's been incarcerated? He's more likely to be violent, have problems with authority/entitlement, be risky (STDs like Hep C), and generally speaking have shit luck with employment. Not to mention recidivism if US, if he's gone that far once he'll likely be tempted to do it again. It's hard to trust them, if at all.
It's not related to race.
>Are you racists?I don't think there's anything intrinsic about race that makes someone undateable/unlikeable unless it's an attraction issue.
What gets me turned off is the socialization and cultural expectations that are nurtured in men that go against women's interests. At a passing glance it would appear that certain races treat women better or worse than others–nope–in reality men tend to be universally shit. The only things that make exceptions of them is if they were raised to treat women with respect and show through actions and words that they are good to women. It's a rarity.
No. 513226
>>513176Coping because the model left him and he knows how fug he is, also probably trying to signal to you that he's t-totally available, anon. The average scrot spends his days coping with imaginary rejection from an imaginary mommy in his head.
Are you sure he was dating the model and not only fantasizing about dating her?
No. 513402
>>513387I've started making a few posts here and there, and it seems nice. They finally changed the default theme to something less grating on the eyes, too.
I'm hoping it grows more popular, especially after recent events. Might make a picrew thread in their /ot/.
No. 513406
>>513401Here:
https://asherahs.gardenIt was messing up for me when I tried to follow the link on /2X/, too. If it still doesn't work, try copying the link and pasting it into your address bar. That's what I did.
>>513400NTA, but at least in my experience, a lot of us have been here from the start, probably even longer than some of the mods.
It'd be kind of shitty to have to leave a site that you kind of grew up with just because the current admin/mod team are making it difficult.
No. 513411
>>513408tbh, i agree. i'll still post occasionally and obviously lc will still be here, but i think it's a good idea to maybe try to build a community there while we have the opportunity rather than let it die or be abandoned. it could be really good. imo, crystal.cafe could've been so good. would like to see it become a more sane cc. lc is fine and all, but ultimately there's still a lot of focus on drama that i think is unnecessary and draws in certain questionable crowds. a female imageboard not taken over by r9k-tier women and trannies would be beautiful.
>>513402i hope it grows too. there's a blue theme now that's really nice. the default theme is a bit dark but an improvement on the last one for sure. it seems good so far over there.
No. 513415
>>513411>ignoring the fact that one of your own has been larping as a scrotThe mods should have nuked this thread too so you can all fuck off to your own site
And to think I once felt sympathy for you all lol
No. 513423
>>512773My ex would too. Once during a heatwave I went out without a bra on and he sulked for an entire day. Or if i spent too long talking to a man at the tills/behind the bar or if I smiled out of turn at another Male.
The fucker used to spend 40 mins watching porn in the bathroom every day lmao.
No. 513472
>>513226Yeah he's 6'4 and sleeps with younger women who are impressed by his height and the fact that he doesn't live at home.
>>513309He's definitely insecure about being fat and bald.
>>513395He also told me jerks off to tranny porn, so you nailed it kek. I hate this dude so fucking much sorry.
No. 513541
File: 1581350397541.jpg (199.86 KB, 1851x975, metadrama.jpg)
>>513529Maybe I'm an idiot and missed something but looking at this exchange it looks like lc admin is the one that mentioned AG and opera VPN first.
What I don't understand is how lc admin went from the psycho anon saying "uhh some of these posts aren't mine" to jumping to the conclusion that it confirms psycho anon and AG admin are the same people? The whole exchange is confusing, especially as there is no mention of AG either in
https://lolcow.farm/Anon2.html nor
https://lolcow.farm/Anon1.html.
Can someone explain the whole mess?
No. 513564
File: 1581354577488.jpg (449.72 KB, 1600x1600, 1581354485554.jpg)
>>513559Is this enough lol. Changed the color of my skin in case
No. 513566
>>513564In case of what exactly?
Just makes you look even more retarded, if that’s even possible.
Also
>>>/meta/13818>I bet u r fat>says that while having hands like thatBold.
No. 513592
>>513176Desensitization ruined men
They have no privacy or values, can't get turned on anymore, nothing impressed them
Most males are so pornsick that randomly talking in detail about random parts of women's bodies is the norm for them. Sex isn't sacred to them anymore thus not enjoyable
No. 513594
File: 1581360495531.gif (4.51 MB, 560x315, 45A068A2-FD57-4E0A-8868-333AF2…)
>>513564You’re obviously white though, you didn’t paint your hand well enough
Also I don’t care if someone’s a scrote or not, if you get accused of scrotism then that should be ur queue to fuck the hell off, as it means you’re being a pickmeisha idiot.
No. 513622
File: 1581366737075.jpg (28.81 KB, 1280x720, Floral-Windows-10-Background.j…)
>>513380That's because unattractive men are even more aware of the fact that men as a gender don't get to choose. This causes the average neckbeard to cope by posting about pointy elbows in his e-hugbox of choice to suppress the nagging realization that he'd happily go for a 300 lb horse girl with Downs if she gave him a chance.
Men in general seem to have some sort of fundamental beef with reality. They even construct their sentences in a highly wishful manner, i.e. how they'd like things to be instead of how they really are. If you see a male going on and on about something as though anyone cares, you can safely assume he's trying to soothe some kind of psychological injury.
No. 513624
>>513564holy fucking shit my sides
you really really really like attention holy crap
No. 513694
File: 1581381067153.jpg (189.32 KB, 1020x1024, z46mekvwad911.jpg)
Is it just me or do women have way more varied, healthy interests?
It seems like the average scrote only cares about porn and video games, sports, weeb shit, maybe cars. But if you compare lolcow to 4chan for example, you see so much more variety in threads…poetry, journaling, writing, decorating, nail art, collecting, there was even the zero-waste thread a while back that people were into. And it all just seems so much more…idk, healthy? Men were a mistake.
No. 513699
File: 1581381894283.png (86.64 KB, 888x318, Screen Shot 2020-02-10 at 6.40…)
Man I don't know about anybody else but the internet has fucking broken my brain. Every time I interact with a man now I'm thinking "this dude absolutely believes I'm a subhuman whore" and I feel like shit all the time.
It just sucks knowing these things. At least pre-internet you would only be exposed to it a little at a time and it would be easier to handle. I think I go to misogynistic places on the internet to hurt my self esteem at this point so it's my fault technically but now that I know people like this are out there I dread interacting with anyone. I feel like everyone hates women. And so I'm constantly running over things in my head and doubting myself and worrying that hey, if hatred for women is near-universal maybe everyone has a point. Maybe I am truly fucked up and worthless. I don't know how to snap out of this mindset.
I've always hated myself but not nearly as much as I do after discovering redpill-esque spaces on the internet and reading that shit. And my self hatred wasn't based on my being a woman and now it is. So it's different and weird because I know there's no way to change that about myself so there's no cure for that brand of self loathing. Has anyone else had this experience and managed to snap out of it? Or am I just stupid.
No. 513701
File: 1581381990418.png (85.81 KB, 883x247, Screen Shot 2020-02-10 at 6.47…)
>>513699Further suicide fuel.
No. 513718
>>513699You're not alone in feeling this way. It's a mixed blessing that the internet exposed me to feminism (when I was otherwise sheltered from it), but it's also made me more aware of how disgusting and depraved men are. I hate Reddit, I hate social media, I hate porn, but I can't quit using the internet altogether.
I hope I'm not being naively optimistic by believing that most of the men I meet in real life aren't this bad.
No. 513730
File: 1581384933606.jpg (99.94 KB, 1024x1019, 1569922721815.jpg)
>>513724
>And it makes me depressed, and when I get depressed I just go back to reddit to read more to feel worse. It's a pathetic way to live.
Sounds eerily familiar
No. 513776
>>513699t. Dunning-Kruger scrot whose upstanding pursuits consist solely of video games and anal porn.
Per every brilliant moid there are millions of room temperature IQ ones at best and downright criminal ones at worst. The difference between a visionary man and an average man is so vast they might as well be different species. And the more worthless and average a male is, the more he relies on self esteem by proxy from identifying with something he will never be.
No. 513791
File: 1581402964526.jpg (288.18 KB, 1180x2745, tr5qn6qt4le41.jpg)
Found some quasi pinkpill looksmaxxing sub.
https://www.reddit.com/r/vindictaSaw picrelated repost from a rateme sub there, my fucking sides
No. 513840
>>513836Porn sickness and ED will eventually be the end to whatever this generation can produce, if we don't eliminate porn and instant gratification now the human race will literally go extinct, not that anyone cares now that memes and edgelording is encouraged for most people and as much as farmers deny it "internet people" are the norm now at least for young adults and teens
If we're lucky enough the only ones to go on and reproduce are lower class people and remote tribes in Africa because they have no access to porn and their brain naturally adjusts to enjoying the women around them
Men already think it's gay to be vegan, recycle, use low waste items, etc, which is causing this planet to detoriate, the job market is crashing and it is becoming increasingly harder to live on one's own.
Glorification of murder and other horrific crimes is already going to take out a good bit of people
I don't know what will kill us first tbh, a woman only island doesn't sound too bad
No. 513849
>>513791I don't even know what kind of brain damage one has to have to a)think those rating are anywhere near accurate for the girls, they are all normal to beautiful and looj healthy so what the fuck b)come up with this order for the men, especially 6?? c)think the men are anywhere near the level of the women
No wonder so many of them complain about being alone when they think this is their looksmatch.
No. 513868
File: 1581429066888.jpeg (18.87 KB, 280x373, sgzzp2z3gj9higdgg4q9d5dh01ro87…)
>>513838Reminds me of this freak.
https://www.daily-chronicle.com/2016/12/08/energym-employee-charged-with-criminal-sexual-abuse/adnr6ph/>Detectives interviewed witnesses and obtained video taken inside Energym. He said their investigation found Hannon was behind the girl, who was bending over to drink from a water fountain. Hannon then placed his hands on her hips and pressed his lower body against her, he said.He touched 6 girls while being employed by the gym. He also pleaded not guilty. Despite this coming to light 4 years ago, the trial is still going on to this day.
https://www.shawmediaillinois.com/2020/01/06/sycamore-coach-accused-of-touching-girls-has-june-court-date/acqbu2/ No. 513889
File: 1581432879171.png (137.4 KB, 1006x725, 354455435.PNG)
If you scroll down you see neck beards comparing themselves to solders. Not to racebait, but the dumbest take was the dude who said this applied double if you're white.
No. 513899
>>513849>what kind of brain damageBeing male and thus having an inherent tendency towards posturing and coping. It's as natural as breathing to the average man. You should stop taking anything they say at face value.
This is barely a 7 - a girl all of them would be happily beta orbiting or paypigging for:
https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/eyt9ha/21f_rate_me/Once the average poster there is done rating models as 4.1 he goes back to lookism dot com to publicly contemplate suicide over all the Chads these fives and fours are raking in due to their "pussy pass".
No. 513901
File: 1581434131819.png (66.06 KB, 910x658, thats enough reddit for today.…)
>>513892The topic starts about how they're excluded for opportunities made for women, but quickly develops into how women threaten them all with fake rape accusations
I didn't think anyone could be so obsessed with their own ability to rape freely until I discovered reddit
No. 513904
>>513901>I would rather be raped than accused of itMan, what an egotistically privileged thing to say.
Who would rather be a
victim of a crime than being accused of the crime?
This is like saying someone would rather be murdered than accused of murder. Someone would rather be stabbed than accused of stabbing. Someone would rather be stolen from than accused of being a thief.
Guess what? The only people scared of getting accused of crimes they didn't commit, tend to be criminals. They tend to be people with skeletons in their closet who are afraid that past shit is gonna catch up with them.
An innocent person would cooperate, give their honest account, and actually be invested in catching the true perpetrator. This is major bullshit. I'd be wary of any man who thought violence is a better option than losing face. Dangerous……
No. 513913
>>513904A hot take from a moid, considering that moids straight up murder gay men with impunity on a mere suspicion that they might rape them (gay panic). I sure hope that one day I can just waste a scrot because he's sexually attracted to women and would thus target women in case he decided to rape.
If (hopefully) he gets raped he will immediately proceed to screech about how horrible it is, how much worse it is for scrots and how women need to fix it for him. Disgusting shitdick.