[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

A surprise month of Hellmas is now in effect. For the rest of the month of December, VPN posting will be banned.
The Lolcow Awards are back! Submit your nominations until the 20th of December

File: 1733696205228.png (25.48 KB, 761x707, 1714033103379.png)

No. 2297525

Previous >>1978406

Thread to discuss the phenomenon of "fujoshi", the women that identify as such and the women who criticise it.

To a latter extent, discuss also the phenomenon of "yumejoshi" and "himejoshi", especially when it comes to the yume vs. fujo feud.

Discuss the history of fujoshism, speculate on its reasons, argue your opinion on it and exchange intelligent views with other farmers.

Topics include:
>Is the fujoshi-to-TIF pipeline real, or merely a symptom of something else?
>Do fujoshi self-insert in the uke and/or seme? Or do fujoshi simply look at slash couples in a voyeuristic manner?
>What is your view on the early 2000s phenomenon of identifying as a fujoshi "but not supporting real life homos"?
>Is being a fujoshi a way of escaping misogyny, or does it reinforce it?
>What is your opinion on omegaverse, and the het omegaverse which followed?
>Are fujos addicted to pornography? Are yumes?
>Why is fujo stuff so popular in Japan, a highly conservative, homophobic and misogynistic society?
>Can yumes and fujos be friends?

New questions:
>Are lesbian fujoshi actually a thing?
>Why do fujos look at, draw and talk about yaoi together, while moids who enjoy hentai do so completely alone in their gooncaves?
>Are women who enjoy "male character with chopped tits and/or a vag" actually fujoshi? If not, what are they?
>Why do you think so meny supposed straight content made for women caters to men?
>Do you think there is a problem
when it comes to female sexualization when it comes to josei smut?

Be respectful and do not infight. Honest discussion only.

No. 2297532

We told you not to make a new one retard. delete this

No. 2297534

>>2297532
who is ''we''

No. 2297535

3rd for FUJOS ARE FAT

No. 2297543

>>2297522
Isn't most josei smut self-published doujinshi anyways? Plus otome VNs also have that same problem of conventionally attractive MC, and they are primarily targeted for the female audience too. Idk I just don't see the big problem. It's almost like fujos just want to see an ugly MC so they can self-insert better or something.

No. 2297545

>>2297543
You really do sound exactly like moids who call women ugly if they don't like their coomslop.

No. 2297547

>>2297543
are you incapable of thinking besides black or white? not wanting a big titty hentai monster mc isnt the same as wanting an ugly mc. Most male mc arent ugly, they are just plain so the anime girl can stand out.

No. 2297550

still thinking about that poster yesterday who implied self-inserting is the non-autistic choice for interacting w/ media

No. 2297552

>>2297545
If you get triggered by seeing beautiful women in fiction then maybe you just have some self-esteem problems yourself? Why would I want to see uglies in my fiction

>>2297547
>not wanting a big titty hentai monster mc isnt the same as wanting an ugly mc.
Except that's not even most otome/yume media anyways. Most of the time the MC is also just a plain faceless woman. And yet you'll still find ways to complain about that. Wonder why…

No. 2297557

File: 1733697232162.jpg (955.4 KB, 1280x1820, tumblr_nn6tuxkBtq1sdbgg3o1_128…)

>>2297552
if you think pic rel is ugly because it doesnt have gigantic breasts then you are pornsick

No. 2297559

>>2297552
Nobody is talking about sfw stuff with normal MCs, the conversation was about erotic content from the very beginning. You all admit that you don't like the sex scenes looking identical to moid hentai but when fujos point it out it must be because we're ugly.

No. 2297561

File: 1733697347265.png (529.98 KB, 1280x517, tumblr_a5143ec1aa94a64a3a3dbf6…)

>>2297557
I don't think this is ugly, but this is the kind of shit that self-hating fujos will complain about. They have to look like some tumblrina caricature like picrel

No. 2297562

Imagine if moids were told they have low self esteem if they didnt want to see sexualized oiled twinks with gigantic pecs and in tiny revealing clothes kek the double standards are real

No. 2297563

>>2297552
>Most of the time the MC is also just a plain faceless woman.
I love how people confidently speak on things they have no experience with kek.

No. 2297564

>>2297562
i would tell a moid that tho

No. 2297565

>>2297561
Literally no one said this, i am a fujo and cyper is the only shoujo i like because the mc is actually cute and not sexualized

No. 2297566

>>2297561
That's just you and your delusional strawman that just shows you can't comprehend the differences between titmonster, normal, and tumblrslop.

No. 2297567

>>2297564
ok go to 4chan and do it then

No. 2297568

I should probably lurk more on these autistic ass threads but imagine wanting to see another woman in your porn. The only acceptable porn for healthy straight women is either Yaoi, femdom, or female POV. Sex by nature is stimulating the female while the man is just there, and it is isn't meant to be viewed, only experienced. However, if I were to view it then I'd rather see a man getting stimulated

No. 2297575

>>2297567
what thread should i do it in?

No. 2297577

File: 1733697592441.png (30.66 KB, 272x272, 1427185005673.png)

>>2297561
Why is Umi Indian and why do tumblrites always absolutely destroy her design every time they draw her. I guess they also love to make Nozomi deathfag and black but at least most of the time they keep her attractive. With Umi they just make her look like a TiM. Every. Single. Time.

No. 2297578

>>2297575
go to /v/ and storm into the trillion gamergate/kotaku threads

No. 2297579

>>2297562
>if they didnt want to see sexualized oiled twinks with gigantic pecs and in tiny revealing clothes
Moids will just joke about how the MC is making them gay. Meanwhile women have to moralfag and think it's another case of oppreshun

No. 2297582

>>2297575
There's a billion coomer threads up on /a/ and /v/ at all times.

No. 2297583

File: 1733697718876.png (130.9 KB, 852x1200, eb935905d2b3aeea6654a3bace2a60…)

>>2297561
>They have to look like some tumblrina caricature like picrel
I think pic related is cute, it's made by a fujo. Does she really look like a tumblrina caricature?

No. 2297584

>>2297568
>being a faghag is healthy for women

No. 2297586

>>2297583
She doesn't have giant bouncing tits so she's ugly

No. 2297593

File: 1733698074213.jpg (173.15 KB, 850x478, sample_f0adec3c85ee927dc16bdc9…)

>>2297579
why do you pickmes always make up headcanons to defend your dear moids, there have been several male characters that get censored or uglyfied because men complain. Moids threw a hissy fit and got a woman fired over this.

No. 2297594

>>2297578
>>2297582
now i remember why i stopped posting there. fucking 900 second captcha

No. 2297602

>>2297584
I find male homosexuality repugnant, I hate gay men more than I hate hetero men. Men exist to service women. That is all.

No. 2297604

>>2297584
Don't watch faggots; dogs or BDSM can do or other shit can do. The whole point is to get off to the mans reactions. "Normal" porn works for men because sex in its natural state is all about the women's reactions and the men are expendable so it doesn't matter whether the men themselves are doing it or viewing it but if women were to view it then to view the women's reactions while the man continues to be expendable is retarded

No. 2297606

>>2297568
Imagine being told you're the weird one because you're a straight woman watching straight porn and the only way you should enjoy it is by either watching two guys fuck or having no view of the woman at all like some kind of insecure weirdo.

No. 2297607

>>2297602
they service me by fucking eachother

No. 2297608

>>2297606
If you want the camera on the woman in straight porn, then you're not straight.

No. 2297609

>>2297583
Looks like bpd yandere moidslop

No. 2297610

>>2297606
Please understand, fujos are grossly overweight and deformed so the thing they want the least is for some fictional girl to trigger their insecurities when watching porn.

No. 2297614

>>2297608
Straight people tend to want to see other straight people fuck in their porn, anon. Most of the time, a woman is present. That's the way it works.

No. 2297616

>>2297583
if it was yuri in this style then fujos would be quick to call it for scrotes. the hypocrisy

No. 2297617

>>2297610
reminds me of moids saying that only feminazis with neon hair dislike sexualized women in videogames, some of you need to go back to moidchan

No. 2297620

>>2297614
Yeah, straight people still want the camera on the sex they are attracted to though. You think straight men watch porn with moids getting all the screentime?

No. 2297623

>>2297617
Moids also breathe oxygen. Perhaps you should exit bag yourself to own the moids.(a-logging)

No. 2297625

>>2297352
You must be sending these replies from some kind of parallel dimension where Lolcor is completely different, because yaoi is mostly mentioned in a negative context outside of its dedicated threads on /m/.

No. 2297628

>>2297623
>Telling people to kill themselves because she can't refute that her argument was taken straight out of the gamergate playbook

No. 2297633

>>2297628
nonny telling you to workout is not a gamergate psyop kek

No. 2297635

>>2297614
Sex isn't meant to be viewed by women anon. Men can view it just fine because their sensations are the least important part of it kek. Which is why erotica is more popular amongst women, that's when the description of the sensations sets in. If you're viewing a woman moaning because of the feeling of a dick inside her while the camera goes over her body without you yourself getting turned off then there's something off about you, and that's okay, because you're not meant to be viewing that in the first place; pornography is completely unnatural.
Conversely, you also have to be some sick fuck to be wanting to see the men to be the ones feeling said sensations instead of you going out there to actually experience them. Which is fine, everyone here is autistic anyway.

No. 2297636

File: 1733699403000.jpg (3.98 KB, 192x192, 2Q==.jpg)

>>2297610
>The only reason a woman would dislike male-gaze porn is if she's ugly!!1!

No. 2297640

projecting your insecurities onto women you cant even see speaks more about your own insecurity tbh

No. 2297643

>>2297609
Way off, it's kinda funny.
>>2297616
The last thread posted a yuri in a similiar style and that one has been discussed in the fujo thread just fine.

No. 2297645

>>2297635
>You're a weirdo for being straight and liking straight porn.
This website is laughable.

No. 2297648

>>2297610
Girl hit the gym instead of sperging on a Vietnamese basket weaving forum.

No. 2297650

>>2297640
It's pretty obvious that most farmers are overweight and ugly (who also often project their insecurities unto beautiful women), so that wouldn't be a wrong assumption.

No. 2297651

I think the speds here dont understand than the problem isnt straight smut itself but the fact straight smut focuses too much on the woman and very little on the man. We are also talking about chinese cartoon porn not irl porn.

No. 2297652

>>2297650
sure anon, if that makes you feel better and like you are winning an internet argument you do you.

No. 2297654

>>2297651
They hate other women so much they'd rather defend scrote porn than demand more femgaze stuff. And then they call other women pickmes.

No. 2297655

>>2297651
I want het porn where the man is sexualized and the woman not so much. Is that too much to ask for?

No. 2297657

>>2297655
Yes, according to anons itt, you should be happy with looking at big tits. You're a misogynist if you need a hot man to get off.

No. 2297660

>>2297651
Idk if this makes sense, but I feel like the focus is on the women because josei smut is usually maledom and because of that women are considered the "uke"? In josei femdom stuff where the female lead is the seme I see more focus on males

No. 2297661

>thread devolving into another ur fat!!!1!
No wonder some women want to troon out

No. 2297665

>>2297660
Porn always focuses on the party but getting "done" because they tend to have better visual reactions.

No. 2297666

>>2297645
You're a closeted homosexual for wanting to watch another woman get dicked and you're a freak for wanting to watch a man get dicked and the only answer is to go outside and get some dick yourself instead of watching other people have sex(infighting)

No. 2297667

>>2297666
Real dick was never an option in this convo

No. 2297670

>>2297568
This is also bait

No. 2297672

>>2297666
Nta, no she isn't. Even as a fujo myself I think you're being deranged.

No. 2297675

Perhaps you all need to consume less porn and get hobbies not related to voyeurism?

No. 2297676

>>2297561
As a fujo I find that kind of Tumblr slop completely repulsive. Stop strawmanning.

No. 2297679

>>2297675
Perhaps you need to mind your own damn business and stop scolding other women like a schoolmarm

No. 2297681

>>2297675
Also not an option. Why don't normalfags fuck off to the irlshit threads?

No. 2297682

>>2297675
Do you just not get horny?

No. 2297684

>>2297666
So are fujos closeted troons for watching two guys fuck? I'm straight. I like straight porn. That doesn't make me strange it just means you all are perpetually online and forgotten how real people work.

No. 2297685

>>2297666
You're "watching" a man and a woman have sex. You need to project onto an attractive woman because we get off by being seen as attractive. it's not that hard

No. 2297687

>>2297675
Do you know where you are? If the Anons here actually followed this advice and didn't invest like 75%-88% of their (hopefully only online) identities to the type of porn they schlick too and media they consume we literally would not have this and 5+ other threads of this exact topic but with different flavors. Unironically, we'd probably only have the fandom-discourse thread. I'm telling you, it isn't natural to be this invested in pornography the second you start to invest your identity into it and argue over this stuff you're too far-gone. At least it provides
>quality laughs and shitposts
>a reminder to disconnect and form hobbies and interests outside of media consumption

No. 2297688

>>2297685
>we get off by being seen as attractive
No we don't, you sound like an AGP.

No. 2297690

>>2297685
>we get off by being seen as attractive
Oh lord.

No. 2297692

>>2297685
no we don't, don't project that onto other women. Retard.

No. 2297694

>>2297690
>>2297688
lmao. Do you not want your partner to be attracted to you?

No. 2297695

>>2297221
But when do you even sexualize men though? All I see is pooner tier menstruation over their spechul feewings and compwexity. The average bloobloo plotline is even more cringe than the mopiest grocery isle romance novel for 45 year old aunties, and the "sexualization" is suitslop tier.
>>2297227
Have fun writing the exact same cringe melodrama while coping by pretending you don't want it because you're in the cuck chair.

No. 2297697

>>2297687
Why does everyone assume that BL is purely porn? Or that yume stuff is purely porn, for that matter? It's a whole-ass genre.

No. 2297698

>>2297692
tell that to the supposedly femgaze doujins where the woman is focused on, or the ML's constantly praising how beautiful MC is. men's media NEVER does that

No. 2297700

>>2297694
Of course, but I don't get horny at the thought of being hot kek

No. 2297701

>>2297687
why when real life is shit? what's wrong with the occasional escapism?

No. 2297702

File: 1733701022989.jpg (572.8 KB, 1500x2133, Yby.jpg)

>>2297583
Dog best boy

No. 2297705

>>2297700
That's not the same as being found attractive enough to cause a physical reaction in someone you fancy, for him to admire your features. You know like we constantly do the same to men. Men should be able to do the same, unfortunately they rotted their brains and optimized their media to focus on the woman only. We need to go back to the Greek views on the male body without the misogyny

No. 2297710

>>2297695
>pretending you don't want it because you're in the cuck chair.
I literally do not want to be a pregnant housewife you psycho trad, that's your retarded fantasy, not a universal ideal. Being married to a moid means supporting him financially and being his surrogate mom, fuck that. And babies are fucking disgusting, I'd rather shovel manure than clean spit-up. No one is being "cuckolded" by drawings, you just think that because you're a schizo who can't separate art from reality.

No. 2297711

>>2297543
Fujos don't want to see any female MC because they're pooners who hate themselves. There have been many deeply amusing attempts at finding out what kind of fMC look they'd find acceptable. There isn't one.(baiting)

No. 2297713

>>2297694
It's not a requirement for arousal, no, and being flattered is not the same as "getting off on it."

No. 2297716

>>2297711
>pooners
Go back to 4skin you fucking AGP

No. 2297717

>>2297711
???
many fujos read straight content too, i don't know why you retards keep pretending like they don't. On most stories i read i find fujos reading them too. Idk why yall keep lying. But that's probably because you are a yuripedo.

No. 2297722

>ITT anons who fell for the moid psyop so hard that they get off to their own reflections and bash women who'd rather look at hot men.

No. 2297724

>>2297713
Why does so many femgaze stuff also focus on the woman then? It's not a requirement, but it also doesn't hurt either.

No. 2297725

>>2297711
Fujos are comfortable enough in their sexuality to love themselves and enjoy two men in love with each other.

No. 2297727

>>2297602
Straight men are the ones killing and raping us, dumbfuck. Gay men suck too but at least now that they're more accepted they fuck each other and leave us the hell alone.

No. 2297728

>>2297724
Because the authors don't know how to depict sexuality in any other way than the mood status quo and don't care to improve.

No. 2297729

File: 1733701649588.jpg (440.16 KB, 960x1361, Mc.jpg)

>>2297711
There's plenty examples though.

No. 2297732

>>2297728
is it really an improvement if only the male gets sexualized though? I feel like way too many people get all knee-jerky about this because women are already sexualized everywhere. But if that wasn't the case this wouldn't be a problem

No. 2297734

>>2297732
Yes because women don't sexualize men irl to the degree men sexualize women irl f.e; passport bros

No. 2297736

>>2297710
But I'm not into any kind of romanceslop you silly landwhale. It's just deeply amusing how you cringe at tradshit romanceslop while consuming gallons of it from what you perceive to be a safe distance. That schizo reply alone suggests a sad, repressed life of self-denial.

No. 2297739

>>2297722
I can't tell if they're so narcissistic that they HAVE to imagine themselves as hentai proportioned anime waifus, or if they're so insecure they can't self-insert to "boring" characters because it's not a good enough power fantasy. Either option would be okay if they didn't insist on bashing everyone else for it and projecting their neuroses everywhere.
>>2297729
Inb4 they call this a Tumblr OC

No. 2297740

>>2297734
attractive female MC's being shown just seems analogous to cool ripped male badass MC's in mens media tbh. I want to be beautiful too and admired for those features

No. 2297741

>>2297739
A nice figure isn't hentai proportions lmao. It's just tit for tat. I'd want to be as equally attractive for a hot anime guy

No. 2297742

File: 1733701936836.png (133.61 KB, 680x680, 1000036027.png)

>>2297725
>Fujos are comfortable in their sexuality

No. 2297743

>>2297739
Samefag, I'm specifically talking about anons itt not all yumefags/joseifags

No. 2297744

>>2297711
I’m the biggest Fujo in the world yet my fave ships are all straight. I don’t get why people assume that all Fujos hate women and just aren’t massively into the male form. Has no one watched Free Iwatobi swim club? I feel like Go Matsuoka is how most sane Fujos are like. I love Josei manga too. It’s just from my experience straight hentai the men rarely deserve the women or are not hot enough. And when they are hot they always make the women act like dumb virgin children who never even heard the word sex before despite being like 28. At least in BL they don’t lobotomize one of the characters usually.

No. 2297746

>>2297729
source?

No. 2297748

>>2297744
my problem with fujoshis is that those who think like this just give up on het romance and smut. find/write/draw things that aren't like this then. It's copium on my part but I still believe in het romance

No. 2297749

>>2297729
They don't want to acknowledge all the fujo mangaka who also create shoujo/josei with feMCs because it destroys their narrative.

No. 2297751

>>2297748
>do my job for you
nta but why

No. 2297754

>>2297751
I didn't say that. that's why I put "Find" in there lmao. My job isn't to find shit for you either

No. 2297755

>>2297751
Because they blame everything on us. It's our responsibility to fix het romance, not het fans.

No. 2297758

>POONER POONER POONER
I feel like part of the problem is that some anons are so obsessed with troons that they see troon "warning signs" everywhere. It's ironic because yuri (and pretty much any anime porn involving a female character tbh) attracts TIMs just like BL attracts TIFs kek. That's just an unfortunate consequence of modern fandom and doesn't really have anything to do with anons itt.

No. 2297759

>the josei thread is nothing but smol dainty submissive big titty female mcs
oof

No. 2297760

>>2297736
I have a BMI of 17.4 you fucking pig. YOU are a schizo because you get jealous when you see a drawing fucking another drawing. That is categorically the behavior of an insane person.

No. 2297761

>>2297740
i think you are confused and we keep on having this same convo over and over again because you can't understand nuance.

We are okay with pretty female leads, we are even okay with ones that are sexy.

The problem here is when the female leads get turned into coombait and there is too much focus on her body during the sex scenes. Or authors doing cashgrabs and making their josei smuts be male gazed because they want to omnipander.

You can't be this retarded to not understand what we mean, right?

For example look at manhwas like Beethoven Syndrome or Uknown Caller in those stories despite them being named josei the female lead is way too sexualised and treated like a blow up sex doll and the male leads behave like incels.

No. 2297763

>>2297748
No one gives up on het romance I still read Josei manga but I like BL because I like seeing anime men kissing and moaning what’s so hard about this for Fujo haters to compute!? Have you never listened to the joys of a BLCD!?

No. 2297766

>>2297742
you not believing this is the entire reason this thread exists, congrats nonna

No. 2297767

>>2297759
Welcome to how Japanese women want to see themselves.

No. 2297770

>>2297761
I've never read a manhwa and I thought you all were just bringing up the "mc is too conventionally attractive" discourse in otome/shoujosei

No. 2297773

>>2297746
Madara Moyou no Yoi

No. 2297776

>>2297767
And these weebs fall for that, 30 layers of makeup and 50k of plastic surgery LOLOL

No. 2297778

>>2297763
Seconding this. I enjoy romance fiction in general, so obviously I've read some het and yuri stuff I liked. BL just happens to be my favorite, it's not that deep.

No. 2297779

>>2297776
nah thats korean kek

No. 2297780

File: 1733702485586.webp (Spoiler Image,140.24 KB, 1280x960, 1733701569651.webp)

>>2297767
no wonder yaoi is so popular there if the alternative is this

No. 2297783

>>2297758
>It's ironic because yuri (and pretty much any anime porn involving a female character tbh) attracts TIMs just like BL attracts TIFs kek.
And even funnier, they like it because they're usually OSA! Of course male troons are going to like yuri, they're straight. vice versa for tifs.

No. 2297784

>>2297770
so you still didn't understand what i said and will keep on saying ''you just hate pretty women''….ok well my fault for talking to a wall you can keep going i guess.

No. 2297787

>>2297780
the story is actually good if you read it and the men are equally sexualised, why are you lurking that other thread when i (yume) have been defending you retarded fujos throughout this whole thread? Now you are behaving just like yurifags…

No. 2297789

>>2297767
Apologies if you're being sarcastic, but if you're serious I don't think this is really a gotcha considering how toxic and misogynistic Japanese beauty standards are.

No. 2297792

>>2297763
you just said that in het romance the women act like dumb virgin children and the men arent hot enough

No. 2297793

>>2297749
I've read a josei doujin by a fujo mangaka. The fMC was treated with extreme respect because to be a fujoshi is to be a based feminist.
Jk, it was a stomach churning isekai saintess gangrape storyline with booba and female focus.

No. 2297794

>>2297701
>what's wrong with the occasional escapism?
Keyword: occasional

No. 2297796

>>2297784
I didn't say that, IDK who i'm even talking to. I just came in here saying that women like me like to project themselves on a pretty MC and people then deny that

No. 2297799

>>2297780
You get it! I’ve tried reading smutty straight female oriented manga but it just doesn’t hit the same. Japanese women and the way they like to be treated by their males is not how I would like to be. They like that infantilizing “idk what sex is yet can you show me uwu” shit. I don’t. They always make the women virginal no matter how old she is and it’s strange. BL doesn’t have that unless it’s set in like HS or dude is denial that he’s gay.

No. 2297800

>>2297780
what the hell is wrong with this?

No. 2297805

>>2297794
You guys treat manga like it's alcohol

No. 2297808

>>2297758
both yuri and yaoi initially garnered mostly female fans then all the western fujoshis started pooning out. inserting tims into this conversation is insincere because this genre wasnt made for them in the first place

No. 2297810

since a certain fujo here wants to infight bait and lurk that other thread and steal screencaps from there im not even going to bother defending fujos anymore. From now on yuripedos can say whatever they want to you and i will mind my business. You hypocrites can't complain about yurifags bullying you yet treating yumes the same way, k bye

>>2297800
anon is just one of those rare fujos who actually do fit the stereotype of a misogynistic fujo

No. 2297816

>>2297787
Ngl I can't wait for this thread to die off again, people are getting too heated over this stupid shit.

No. 2297823

>>2297799
To be fair, I've also seen this weird female socialisation manifest in Western "female oriented" smut too. The most famous example is probably 50 shades of grey. The main character legitimately says she's never even MASTURBATED before she met her maledom LI, and it's like…why? Whose fantasy is bolstered by this puritan shit?

No. 2297824

>>2297799
that story isn't even like that though. Now you are just acting like yurifags commenting on shit yall didn't even read and generalizing a whole genre. Yurifags bullying you is what you deserve.

No. 2297825

>>2297823
i don't think the solution is to escape to two guys fucking each other and take the woman out of the equation

No. 2297829

>>2297808
>It wasn't made for them in the first place
…do you really think no Yuri has ever been made with a scrote audience in mind?

No. 2297830

Wait what's the actual problem if a woman likes a booby or whatever attractive anime character drawn by another woman? Are you seriously comparing women to how scrotes behave? No woman here or elsewhere is going on a rape spree because they found some booby drawing in their yume/yurislop attractive. The problem is men and has always been men.

No. 2297831

>>2297805
Keyword, again, occasional. There's nothing wrong with consuming himejoshi, yumejoshi, fujoshi, etc. content however, you gotta realized that there's a barrier of entry when you've let the media you consume become an integral overbearing part of your identity hence why we have constant round the clock arguing over the flavor of asian media is morally just.

No. 2297839

>>2297830
Moralizing took hold and now it's just getting more and more ridiculous.
I've said it before, but this discussion should have ended with "people like what they like and that's OK."

No. 2297846

File: 1733703369836.jpg (256.05 KB, 1200x675, 1200x675.jpg)

>>2297829
if you cant differentiate between yuri content made for women and anime porn featuring lesbians then youre just retarded

No. 2297849

File: 1733703403193.png (186.94 KB, 1280x720, 1000029961.png)

>>2297825
>I don't think
I mean, this is the crux of the issue. The thread is literally picrel. You're all arguing about your own personal tastes and trying to pass it off as "teh best." There are billions of women on earth and they're all gonna be turned on by different things, and trying to apply morality to cartoon characters smooching is retarded.

No. 2297852

>>2297825
The solution is for you to find instead of moralfagging at women who've disengaged though.

No. 2297854

>>2297787
i am a yume too(i make my own shit because i dont like 99% of yumeshit) i just hate that slop and i just dont see the need for the women to be that sexualized. It just made me understand why yaoi is that popular when the alternative is fucking ugly. Also sorry nonny but the anatomy on the scrotes is offputting and creepy, they have gigantic claws for hands.

No. 2297855

>>2297849
lmfaooo I'm not arguing what turns women on. I'm talking about the moral grandstanding that women take when they get on their highhorse for consuming BL, that het ships are sooo boring or misogynist

No. 2297857

File: 1733703575364.png (366.48 KB, 720x926, 1000029965.png)

>>2297846
Who was picrel made for, then?

No. 2297860

>>2297855
Calm down. It's clearly talking about those retards as well.

No. 2297862

>>2297852
Moralfagging isn't defending against shitty generalizations retard

No. 2297863

>>2297830
I don't entirely understand it, but some anons are uncomfortable with viewing female bodies sexualized in a certain way. It's an understandable way to feel, but I don't think there's anything wrong with people who don't mind it. I think anons need to relax and realize that it's just a preference/comfort level thing.

No. 2297865

>>2297857
isnt that the loli yuri shit

No. 2297867

File: 1733703714068.webp (Spoiler Image,240.75 KB, 1433x2024, 24399862_1433_2024_246532.webp)

>>2297854
yeah alot of yume content is bad i do agree with that. i just don't like how you falsely labelled that story as male gaze because it's one of those rare works where the men are equally sexualised. What you were doing was yurifag behaviour, you can't call out yurifags for certain behaviour then act the same way as them.

No. 2297869

>>2297863
Think I understand why people say "fujoshi's are uncomfortable with their sexuality" if they can't stand a woman being attractive to a man

No. 2297871

>>2297800
>female self insert is ahegaoing
>gigantic tits
>is the focus of the pic instead of the moids
>completly naked while the moids are mostly covered, you cant even see the guy on the back
its nasty, sorry

No. 2297872

>>2297849
Agree 100%. There's stuff I don't like purely for aesthetic reasons, but I'm not going to accuse people of being coomers or bigots or whatever just because they like something I don't. People are free to enjoy what they want to enjoy, as long as it's tagged and legal, I don't care.

No. 2297873

>>2297810
>nooo how dare you dislike my slop
kek no one needed your retarded white knighting anyways

No. 2297875

>>2297867
they dont even have nipples there kek how can you say they are equally sexualized when the fmc has gigantic herd nipples and these guys dont

No. 2297877

>>2297780
I can't stop laughing at how cartoonishly small the woman is

No. 2297879

File: 1733703948466.jpg (78.15 KB, 828x1035, a9deceeae9263e8b98789ca00b1cee…)

>>2297871
fujotroons getting too bold, let's talk about how there is more pregnancy in yaoi than in hetero KEK

No. 2297880

>>2297869
why would the woman need to be attractive to the man? men in hentai for moids dont need to be attractive to the woman

No. 2297882

>>2297871
Those aren't gigantic you retard. those are large, but not freakishly large. and that's not ahegao… what do you want her to do? frown?
and the fantasy here is being ravished by these guys, Why would they be in the center? Especially when two people have sex facing forwards the woman will be in front? Points for her being the only naked one though

No. 2297883

File: 1733704012730.png (1.15 MB, 1080x1728, 1000028447.png)

>>2297857
> yaoi
who was this made for then

No. 2297885

>>2297879
you really need to stop bringing omegaverse when its a miniscule niche most fujos dont like, its like 3% of all yaoi. And i am sorry but you have to be pornsick to not see how sexualized the woman in that joseishit is. She's fucking ahegaoin for god's sake.

No. 2297886

>>2297877
Did you know size difference is a trope? Crazy I know

No. 2297887

>>2297883
its not yaoi, and it was made by a moid who only makes trapshit and straight shota for men.

No. 2297889

>>2297879
Even though just 1 BL pregnancy story is too many, claiming there is more of it than het pregnancy content is crazy.

No. 2297890

>>2297880
So what? They've rotted themselves enough to not care if the woman finds us attractive so we should do the same?

No. 2297891

>>2297886
>Muh trope
It still looks stupid kek I'm sorry

No. 2297892

>>2297869
Just speaking for myself here, but being unable to "stand a woman being attractive to a man," is not why I tend not to seek out straight stuff. My main reason is that the sort of character dynamics I often like just feel icky when it's a straight pairing. I like the drama of characters being terrible for each other but staying together anyway because I like the character intrigue and the psychological component. With two men or two women, it just seems like both people are on equal footing. But with a man and a woman, that kind of dynamic is too common in real life and too sad to be exciting fiction for me. Am I making sense? I like "toxic" relationships in fiction, but I don't want to see a man abuse a woman.

No. 2297893

>>2297883
Answer the question.

No. 2297894

File: 1733704160398.jpg (82.25 KB, 686x386, hq720.jpg)

>>2297885
yeah it's so minuscule that's why omegaverse stories are almost always trending or popular. Get off your copium, fujotroon.

No. 2297895

File: 1733704168468.jpg (434.79 KB, 1062x1280, tumblr_nu1m3yMdrZ1taaksjo1_128…)

>>2297882
> and that's not ahegao
she has fucking heart eyes
>Those aren't gigantic you retard.
they are, they dont look gigantic to you because they are being covered by grotesque yaoi hands. Put it next to pic rel and they look nasty as fuck.

No. 2297897

>>2297886
This is such a bizarrely hostile response to someone laughing at anime porn kekekek

No. 2297899

>>2297887
it IS yaoi, even wikipedia labels it as such. why are you backtracking when anime gay porn has so much shota shit

No. 2297900

>>2297892
That's true and I can't deny a man and woman in a toxic relationship has more baggage IRL. It's just sad that it has to be inherently unequal all the time

No. 2297901

>>2297890
yes, why the fuck should i look attractive to a moid? why should i care about his opinion?

No. 2297902

>>2297897
did you know tropes aren't exclusive to porn? Crazy I know

No. 2297903

>>2297895
you posting cherrypicked picrels from decades ago is not really helping..

No. 2297904

>>2297899
its not yaoi retard, otherwise barashit would also be yaoi. They exist as different things because they are.

No. 2297906

>>2297887
>>2297900
>>2297883
>>2297857
So the moral of the story is that there is no such thing as muh pure uncorrupted feminist genre. The moralfagging itt is so stupid.

No. 2297907

>>2297901
If you want to self insert into or project upon a loving passionate relationship I'd imagine his input is necessary

No. 2297908

>>2297894
omegaverse got popularized after a comic featuring a man getting raped by a dog. barf, fujos are sick

No. 2297910

>>2297903
how is it cherrypicked? it looks like a normal woman even if its not fully covered she doesnt look sexualized, i dont know why joseishit refuses to have normal main characters

No. 2297912

>>2297904
yaoi is anime gay porn, get over it. fujoshis are on the same level of degeneracy as fudanshis anyways

No. 2297913

>>2297906
Er, yes there is. It's called a healthy relationship in fiction

No. 2297916

>>2297908
Source?

No. 2297918

>>2297907
Self insertion is for losers.

No. 2297919

File: 1733704480510.jpg (50.21 KB, 474x489, OIP.jpg)

>fujos will defend this

No. 2297920

>>2297907
Genuine question, do you only think you deserve love and affection if you fit a patriarchal idea of hotness? Maybe some women would find comfort in the opposite type of work, where, idk, an average normie gets a bishie harem.

No. 2297923

File: 1733704536444.jpg (259.93 KB, 600x898, 768c0928507fe4391a61be6d7cb79b…)

>>2297919
>still believing fujos arent massive pedos

No. 2297924

>>2297906
Yes, the moralizing is retarded.
The Strike Witches shit should be fine (as long as it's in the anime thread, I don't know why yuripedo never just looks for more fans there, though she did find a fan in fandom discourse so whatever), the josei stuff is fine, the yaoi stuff is fine, the people complaining about yuri pedophiles this, josei tradthot that, omegaverse pooner this, need to learn to shut the fuck up and get some self awareness.

No. 2297925

>>2297892
How about in scenarios where the sex has nothing to do with why one person is toxic to another? Have you played otome games at all? What power exists if fiction can remove all of that?

No. 2297926

File: 1733704599023.png (165.87 KB, 540x300, 1000029966.png)

>>2297908
ACKSHUALLY the genre was kicked off by Supernatural fanfic. This is BASIC fandom history smh

No. 2297929

>>2297920
romantic love isn't the only form of love btw. If you want romantic love, the most shallow form of love, you need to be attractive enough.

No. 2297930

File: 1733704653836.jpg (173.56 KB, 640x960, MV5BYWZkOGVkNjItNDhhYS00NWFlLW…)

>>2297907
friendly reminder most love stories have the ugly moid landing a qtie who loves him for ''who he is uwu'' but asking the same from stuff made for women is too much, we have to be blow up hentai dolls even in fiction to be loved. Bleak.

No. 2297931

>>2297918
It doesn't sit right with me to just ship a hot ML with an ugly FL.

No. 2297934

>>2297929
>Oh so you think romantic love is the only one that matters?
You know DAMN WELL that was not the meaning of the question lmfao

No. 2297935

>>2297916
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omegaverse
>Omegaverse fiction typically focuses on wolf or other canid-like behavior in humans, especially as it pertains to sexual intercourse and sexuality, which is described as instinctual, responding to animalistic physiological stimuli.[1][2] This includes rutting and heat cycles, pheromonal attraction between Alphas and Omegas,[10] penises with knots (used to "knot", or tie, the partner to an Alpha during copulation, an action known as "knotting"),[1] scent marking,[11] imprinting,[8] breeding, mating rites, pack structures[12] and potentially permanent psychic bonds with a mate.[6]

No. 2297936

>>2297930
I don't care if other people consume ugly girl x hot guy shit, quit being emotional, nobody's out to get you

No. 2297938

>>2297931
>>2297929
becky hands typed these posts

No. 2297939

>>2297934
That was the meaning lol. Otherwise why would you ask it. Having a nice figure and a pretty face isn't patriarchy lmao

No. 2297940

>>2297913
So do anons itt just not infer meaning from context, or…?

No. 2297943

New standard set, if you don't have Z cup tits you don't deserve romantic love.

No. 2297944

>>2297938
if you want your MC's to be ugly because you personally find them relatable, that's not my problem

No. 2297945

>>2297935
kek nonny, its based on a supernatural fanfic its not about fucking dogs.

No. 2297947

>>2297943
who the fuck said that retard. people think having a nice figure is too much

No. 2297948

>>2297935
This isn't a comic, though finding out that the moid "alpha chads and faggy betas" coming from the same source actually makes omegaverse a little based imo.

No. 2297949

>>2297939
You are being obtuse. Obviously that's the type of love anons will focus on in a thread related to romance genres. I feel like even autists would implicitly understand this.

No. 2297952

if youre a straight woman then the only respectable romantic and sexual role for you is to be a faghag cuck for the gays. imagining yourself with your husbando is too pickme

No. 2297953

>>2297949
That's not consistent with the cultural tendency to treat romantic love as the ultimate form of love

No. 2297954

>>2297944
you honestly sound really insecure nonny, you are either an anachan or one of those womens who spends thousands to get the new trendy cosmetic surgery to be a sex doll to men. Bleak shit.

No. 2297958

>>2297952
no one said this ever, if you like to look at women with gigantic tits good for you but some of us are straight and prefeer looking at hot guys instead.

No. 2297959

>>2297855
thats new age fujos us old hags just want to masturbate to anime men moaning and go

No. 2297960

>>2297954
Holy shit go get yourself checked out. There's a lot of grey area between "barbie doll" and "ugly as shit"

No. 2297961

>>2297960
according to you not really since you keep defending ahegaoing big titty monsters kek

No. 2297962

File: 1733705089777.jpg (89.98 KB, 651x876, 1000004302.jpg)

>>2297867
what is happening???

No. 2297963

>>2297952
>Cuck
Did a gay moid steal your Nigel or something? What is it with you guys and projecting your obsession about being cucked by cartoons??

No. 2297966

>>2297960
The irony of this statement…

No. 2297967

>>2297867
This shit sucks, what the fuck

No. 2297970

>>2297867
this is terrifying to me and makes me feel fear for the MC now if the boys were talking to eacho other instead of fear and deep dread i'd feel hot and bothered

No. 2297971

>>2297952
Nice, I don’t like self-inserting. Two hot guys is better together.

No. 2297972

>>2297961
last time i checked you don't need plastic surgery to make an ahegao face. and why are you so irked at this? you only dislike it becasue it's featured so much in shitty misogynist male gaze hentai

No. 2297979

>>2297972
>you only dislike it becasue it's featured so much in shitty misogynist male gaze hentai
well..duh the whole discussion is about how male gazey joseishit is

No. 2297982

>>2297966
Do you also have an issue with MC being as attractive as the guys

No. 2297983

>ITT: woman who takes out a second mortgage to fund her makeup addiction calling other women insecure.

No. 2297986

>>2297972
NTA but I also dislike it because it looks dumb
>Inb4 AHEGAO FACE IS A SACRED TROPE

No. 2297987

>>2297952
i dont get this logic i dont even watch IRL gay porn because I dont care about IRL gay men I just like anime men.
>>2297919
I never understood this because Sebastian is clearly straight he is constantly fucking on women throughout the series

No. 2297989

>>2297979
Go schlick it to eyeless plain MC's then who are barely in the camera but don't call attractive MC's that are seen in panels malegazey

No. 2297990

>>2297986
Yeah I think it's dumb but it's not inherently male gazey to depict something.

No. 2297992

>>2297989
>dont call the mc thats doing a male hentai trope is fully naked in the focus and has massive tits malegazey!!
kek

No. 2297994

>>2297989
Do…do you schlick it to the feMC?

No. 2297996

>>2297992
you're going to be so mad when you find out that sex positions tend to feature the female in front of the male, especially with a fantasy of being controlled and dominated

No. 2297998

>>2297994
lol. do you want the guy to be unnaturally in the panel all the time?

No. 2297999

File: 1733705570954.jpg (263.89 KB, 600x800, R.jpg)

>>2297987
>is purposefully obtuse of how delusional fujos are about their pedo ships
if they werent then fujos wouldnt be reeing about the mha ending on twitter

No. 2298001

>>2297998
Answer the question.

No. 2298004

>>2298001
an obtuse response in exchange for a deliberate troll question meant to distract from the actual topic

No. 2298007

>>2298004
So you do schlick to the tittymonster pictures…

No. 2298012

>>2298007
nta but when did you guys start using that term to refer to masturbating its so scrote like

No. 2298013

>>2298007
yeah yeah now go be a yumetrash somewhere else and pretend that the guy is attracted to your 300 pound self with no eyes

No. 2298015

>>2297996
i am not mad i draw my own shit for that reason, i accepted most women are pickmes when 50 shades of grey got adapted into a big budget movie

No. 2298016

I know that this is off-topic from what you are all discussing but does anyone else have slight body dysphoria when reading BL ?
I don't have it from just one story but if i only read BL for a certain period of time i start experiencing it and then go on a break.

I honestly don't know if my dysphoria was caused by BL or by seeing how badly this world treats women and wanting a escape from that but i definitely do get flare ups if i binge read too many BL comics.

Also please normal replies i wil be ignoring the baiters.

No. 2298018

>>2297926
Anyone who doesn't know that ABO got started because of SPN is too young or too normal to be here imo

No. 2298019

>>2298012
criticizing people for masculine behavior isn't a very consistent thing to do. this who website is a scrote thing to do

No. 2298020

>>2298016
Sounds like a you problem tbh

No. 2298025

>>2298016
No, get help. I have been reading BL my entire life and i have never experienced this.

No. 2298026

File: 1733705895444.png (272.73 KB, 594x566, loll.png)

I think we need to bring back homophobic fujos though, the last time I saw them was on lc and a handful of jjk fujos who outed themselves after the election. I want yumespergs to stfu too but don't get mad when somebody calls your faggots loser faggots I think it's funny. I'm kidding but for real, no genre is really 100% turbo feminist or whatever. I understand now why this conversation keeps going in circles on either side, female socialization is straight up inconvenient at times. I want female autism to be free and spread its wings even if it's evil

No. 2298028

>>2298013
this is the type of person that calls fujos insecure, someone who thinks she doesnt deserve love from a fictional man unless she looks like a hentai trope. Pathetic.

No. 2298030

>>2298026
Straight healthy romance is feminist.

No. 2298034

>>2298026
i have never watched this show but i support that yaoi yaoi because those guys are way too ugly to be with such a pretty woman, she deserved way better than an unshaved uggo and what looks like anachan astarion

No. 2298035

>>2298026
Honestly I hate gay men, but the reason I don't peddle homophobic rhetoric is that it indeed does hurt women in the process (see Russia and China).

No. 2298036

>>2298028
There you go, making an overemotional statement by just using "love" again. It's romantic love, buddy. Also pretending that I said you have to look like that woman in the doujin to be attractive. I'm just saying she isn't inherently male gazey. Retard

No. 2298039

>>2297970
>if the boys were talking to eacho other instead of fear and deep dread i'd feel hot and bothered
sorry you got beaten by your nigel but you don't need to project your male trauma onto other women who are comfortable with their own sexuality

No. 2298040

>>2298016
No if anything it makes me want to try a move on my scrote and then laugh and say i got it from yaoi.

No. 2298044

>>2298040
>fujofags are nigelfags
Gee what a surprise. And you call others pickme KEKKK

No. 2298047

Just want to say that I'm a fujo and I fucking despise ABO with a burning passion. I hate ABO 100x more than even the cringiest vanilla hetshit. ABO just takes everything I hate about straight relationships and grafts it back on to gay relationships, while reinforcing misinformation about wolves and adding it disgusting zoophilic shit like knots. I despise it so much and I want to go back in time and assassinate the network exec who greenlit Supernatural because of it. ABO enjoyers need to be sent to the gulags.

No. 2298048

>>2298020
>>2298025
Ok then what do i do? I tried to read yume content but its terrible so i go back to yaoi and start feeling like im not in my body if that makes sense.

No. 2298049

>>2298036
i am sorry but you are the one projecting your irl insecurities onto fiction

No. 2298051

>>2298030
I wish you luck finding healthy feminist romance with a real scrote

No. 2298053

>>2298049
Sorry that you want to stay 300 pounds and not take care of your glaring skin problems

No. 2298054

>>2298026
i do feel like were trapped in some morality debate about whose porn is more "based" and its driving all of us insane b/c like youve said no genre is turbo feminist (or ideologically pure)

No. 2298055

>>2298048
>feeling like im not in my body
Maybe you just need to take your meds

No. 2298056

>>2298048
I don't know anon. We're not doctors here.

No. 2298058

>>2298051
that's why we're talking about fiction lmfao.

No. 2298060

>>2298016
No, the worst was remembering in post clarity that I was unemployed because of Covid and then crying about being a broke bitch wasting her time reading porn.
I got better.

No. 2298061

>>2298053
kek again projecting hard on someone you cant even see

No. 2298062

>>2298026
why do they always put black women with nonblack scrotes im tired make her a black lesbian with a black lesbian lover. now that would be powerful

No. 2298063

File: 1733706291072.jpg (144.71 KB, 897x1156, 1686667617637.jpg)

>>2298039
NTA is it actually normal to be attracted to being belittled by males, am I backwards or something for agreeing with that anon. If a male spoke that way to me my pussy would turn inside out and I'd cry in fear and run away. This thread is crazy, I am learning things I should have never learnt.

No. 2298066

>>2298054
so i'm both 300 pounds and have spent a fortune getting plastic surgery to fit a patriarchal standard? you people can't be consistent

No. 2298068

>>2298058
Claiming that writers making male and female characters kiss is some grand feminist stance is still retarded, though. Healthy depictions of straight romance are better than 50 shades slop but it's not activism kek

No. 2298069

>>2298063
same i dont get it either, i am not even into femdom persay just a normal cute relationship i can even take light teasing but whatever goes on in joseishit is straight up demonic

No. 2298070

>>2298054
Yeah. It's fucking exhausting. There's no such thing as "morally pure" porn, yet we as women hold ourselves to that impossible standard of ethical purity because society has taught us to tear each other down over minor shit like crabs in a bucket. While we sit around nitpicking each other for the slightest impurities, moids run around destroying the world.

No. 2298071

>>2298054
I mean, fujos started it first by pretending that liking buttfucking porn is feminist while shitting on other women. And then they call others misogynist pickmes when they can barely hide their contempt towards other women with different tastes than them.

No. 2298072

>>2298063
They unironically love being degraded by men and put down women who hate that while claiming to be feminist.

No. 2298075

>>2298068
uhhhh yeah not everything advances a feminist ideal. It's enough to NOT be misogynist

No. 2298076

>>2298039
tf are you talking about clearly not if that is where your mind jumps to. Youve also never engaged in straight japanese porn. it almost always has an abuse trope. Id rather get off to men abusing each other then some shoujo protag

No. 2298082

>>2298071
i think more fujos acknowledge that what we like is degen, fujoshi means rotten girl afterall

No. 2298084

>>2298071
>they can barely hide their contempt towards other women with different tastes than them.
Both sides are guilty of this though

No. 2298085

>>2298072
More like some of us have healthy relationships with our sexuality and understand that fiction and reality are different. No one is saying you have to like it either.

No. 2298086

>>2298063
Same. I don't care about genre and like both, but I just want to see submissive men whether it be femdom or a man getting subjugated by another man. I have no interest in seeing men boss around and control women

No. 2298093

>>2298063
see how far they reach? Its so bizarre. Why tf would i want to read about men abusing a woman sexually whether she claims to want it or not? Especially when Japan is known for its rape-y porn. It doesnt matter if its straight or not either Japan sees rape as its own kinky genre.

No. 2298095

>>2298082
Right? We're actually self-aware enough to jokingly call ourselves "rotten," meanwhile yumes and himes are running around calling themselves "princesses" and "dream girls." It's not that deep and it's not worth making a big deal about it, but it's interesting on a linguistic level.

No. 2298096

>>2298070
A lot of the posters in here write like underaged zoomers, maybe that's why the moralfagging is prevalent.

No. 2298097

>>2298085
Then why can't this argument be extended to fujos?

No. 2298101

>>2298085
If we don't have to like it then why do you sit around making a bunch of threads calling us misogynists for hating it?

No. 2298102

>>2298082
Sure, but definitely not the ones on LC. Outside of LC, fujos are fine, but I don't know what it is that makes LC fujos so insufferable. I guess the need to larp as based feminists due to the nature of this site combined with male trauma breeds the most insufferable moralfags.

No. 2298104

>>2298084
Ikr? There is LITERALLY an anon itt going "unsexualised female leads are #WOKE" and they still want to pretend fujos are the only ones being contemptuous kek

No. 2298106

>>2298082
samefagging to say like, just cause i think male ryona is based doesnt mean i dont know how the majority of people react to that. unfortunately the popularity of "dark romance" has made it even more acceptable to vocally like male on female violence

No. 2298107

>>2298063
>>2298063
You are all such fucking baiters oml in that story she literally drugs those men and tries them to get to have sex and when they find her masturbating to them they tell her to strip. Its not that deep, its just smut pwp. You retards want to be so feminist and political as if the slop you read is any better

No. 2298108

>>2298092
>bold declaration of what is "most feminist"
>immediately followed by calling other women whores
Can the retard who posts constant lazy bait in this thread please stop. We get it, you and your boring girlfriend can't think of anything more fun to do with your weekend. Now please go do literally anything else.

No. 2298111

>>2298092
my hot take is i dont masturbate to be feminist i masturbate to get off

No. 2298115

>>2298071
At least in this thread, its pretty easy to find what started it and it was someone posting a person shitting on fujos for being misogynistic and male centered.

No. 2298116

>>2298107
How was anyone meant to know the context

No. 2298119

>>2298107
You don't understand anon, Fujos are just ~not like other girls~

No. 2298120

>>2298048
>>2298016
It probably is a preexisting issue and reading a lot of BL is exacerbating it for you. It sounds like you're using it as an escape and feeling a disconnect between your fantasy and your reality. I don't know what kind of advice to give you though because I have problems with relying on escapism too heavily too. Except don't chop your tits off over it.
Honestly this is part of why I like cuntboy (To adress one of the new questions in the OP) aside from thinking anal is repulsive, I can just relate to the physicality of it more. Anything to my taste is basically nonexistent though, and if it's made by westoids it's going to be gendie shit which annoys me too so I just make my own. I don't know what other fujos opinion on it is though, for the record I'm a shipper and I don't touch original BL works at all.

No. 2298125

>>2298120
>recommending cuntboy porn to someone who's already having body dysphoria
KEKKKK this is why you lot troon out

No. 2298128

>>2298096
This is obvious from the entire crux of the argument.
>My romance animu is ACTIVISM and your romance anime is LITERAL MURDER

No. 2298131

>>2298119
This is such a bizarre reach.

No. 2298135

>>2298128
Nobody said that retard. People are just saying things aren't antifeminist

No. 2298139

>I'm not like other girls okay? I read buttfucking porn instead of those icky het romance that boring Stacies are into

No. 2298141

>>2298120
Thanks for the genuine advice anon, ignore that other baiter. And yeah this didn't start it for me i actually had dysphoria since i started puberty before i read yaoi. For me yaoi just worsens my dysphoria but it didnt start it.
Don't worry i won't troon out.

No. 2298143

>fujos keep saying they would read hetshit if it had better female mcs
>illiterate antifujo >>2298139

No. 2298144

>>2298131
the funniest part is fujos are the biggest recruiters. why tf would we be NLOG if we are constantly trying to get other girls to be like us?

No. 2298148

>>2298126
I've never fucked a moid, polilez-chan. The fact that you view straight women as "whores" to be "used" by moids says a lot about you. This may shock you, but that kind of shit is misogynistic to say regardless of the sexuality of the women at issue.

No. 2298151

>>2298143
I highly doubt that. You'll just nitpick everything and call it malegaze

No. 2298152

File: 1733707417646.gif (2.95 MB, 540x405, 1000003236.gif)

>when you can no longer moralfag over whose porn is more feminist at least you can make it about whose porn makes them NLOG or not

No. 2298153

>>2298144
This is how I know we're arguing with underage newfags kek. "NLOG" is like the only way they can comprehend the notion of women disagreeing with them.

No. 2298154

>>2298144
Tbh, as annoying as BL spaces can be, I have never felt literally unsafe in them the way I have in female character fandoms where troon moids were welcomed and given proximity to underage girls (which I was at the time).

No. 2298156

>>2298016
>but does anyone else have slight body dysphoria when reading BL ?
I don’t.
How severe is your dysphoria? Can you minimize the contacts with tactless people, try eating different food, doing interesting activity like dancing, volleyball or horsing? Try check up blood analysis for deficiencies and if results are alright try a therapist to prescribe you meds. I wish you health and happiness, nona.

No. 2298159

>>2298152
Wait, I agree, but this gif is really cute nonna! Where is it from?

No. 2298160

>>2298154
And yet BL spaces encourage other women to troon out.

No. 2298162

File: 1733707583677.jpg (203.43 KB, 884x1568, Screenshot_20241208_182229_Fir…)

>>2298148
Samefag, she deleted her posts. Chickenshit can't even stand by her own nonsense.

No. 2298163

>>2298157
You have a shit life and I'm sorry, but newsflash, people aren't a monolith, and are individuals. Having sex isn't selling yourself

No. 2298165

>>2298157
Illiteracy, anger issues and tribalism are a sign of low IQ.

No. 2298173

>>2298159
NTA but use sauceNAO (t's probably from a scrote anime anyway)

No. 2298177

>>2298157
>If you willingly have sex with men you're literally a whore
I literally just told you I don't. There's no way you're actually a lesbian, you sound like an incel moid. You have shit taste in anime, too. Strike Witches is moidslop.

No. 2298178

>>2298160
My old fandom was overrun with TIFs too, there is no female nerd space that doesn't have them. I'll pick the one without TIM predators any day.

No. 2298184

>>2298173
I've never heard of this before! Thanks, anon!

No. 2298189

>>2298177
>>2298165
>>2298163
CAN YOU RETARDS STOP REPLYING TO YURIPEDO? STOP FEEDING THE PERSONALITYFAG.

No. 2298197

File: 1733708025724.jpg (180.76 KB, 600x850, MV5BYmRmZmVjZDItZDgyOC00MzhhLT…)

>>2298173
Kek you're right
>It turns out that the PC2198 is an advanced bio-type computer that needs a nearly constant input of sperm to function!

No. 2298198

>>2298181
Damn so we just found out that yuripedo hates het too and not just BL only.

I guess the yumes and fujos got a common enemy now.

No. 2298201

>>2298198
She also hates bi women who exclusively date women btw.

No. 2298202

>>2298162
Yuripedo’s posts are getting deleted because she’s a personalityfag. stop replying to her

No. 2298203

>>2298178
You can block predatory TIMs from your feed but you can't block an entire fandom culture that actively encourages other women to chop their tits off.

No. 2298206

>>2298197
Why is Japan's coom material so, like…especially retarded

No. 2298209

>>2298201
Does this bitch like anything at this point holy shit.

No. 2298212

>>2298203
You're so retarded that you think non-troon women who like BL don't even exist.

No. 2298213

>>2298189
That's yuripedo? Holy shit, that person is clearly a moid. Should be called yuripedo-kun so that's immediately clear.

No. 2298214

>>2298202
Fujos are too retarded. They JUST HAVE to feed the troll

No. 2298215

>>2298198
newfag here, yuripedo is a person and not a label for someone? so she lives up to that name…??

No. 2298216

>>2298141
Yeah I understand, it's a similar story for me. You can't control what you like so while I wouldn't force yourself to read het you don't enjoy, if you like yaoi, but too much makes you uncomfortable with your body or self you should just try to read it in moderation while you work on your personal issues. I do also recommend trying something creative if you don't already, making art or stories for your own sake, with your own tastes, instead of being at the whims of other artists. Even if you suck it's worth a shot.
This is not really the place but honestly the best medicine for dysphoria aside from taking good physical care of yourself is to learn to value yourself as an individual. You don't have to force yourself into a box, and you're not a failure for not perfectly fitting the accepted idea of what a woman should be, or for being uncomfortable with how the world treats females. Yaoi is fantasy and escapism, so I hope you can have fun with it again instead of it making you upset.

No. 2298218

>>2298212
Of course they do but in the mainstream fandom culture, it's encouraged to pursue the yaoi. You can't act morally superior when you have your own troon problem in your spaces

No. 2298219

>>2298214
ayrt you’re also retarded

No. 2298220

>>2298215
Why would you announce the fact that you're a newfag

No. 2298221

>>2298204
Not to be scrotey but
>SAO art style
>Boring kemonomimi, literally just looks like she's wearing a headband
>Tail coming directly out of her flat ass
Atrocious taste tbqh

No. 2298223

>>2298197
I think we can all agree that no matter what women like– yaoi, yuri, yume, femdom– it will never, ever be as retarded as this kind of shit. Good grief, what is wrong with moids? We should all take a moment to appreciate how much classier we are as a sex.

No. 2298225

>>2298218
I'd rather my troon problem not involve being sexually preyed upon.

No. 2298233

>>2298215
Yes its a real person, she got doxxed too and her pictures got posted in another thread (yuri fandom crazies thread). Its some hispanic woman who is like almost 30

No. 2298237

>>2298225
Not even saying one is better than the other, but fujos just act like their spaces are the bastion of safeness when it has its own fair share of troon problem

No. 2298240

>>2298223
Yume here, I agree.

>>2298218
NTA but you guys can just agree to disagree. She can ignore the TIF culture but not the TIMs, whereas you can't ignore the TIFs but can find a way to ignore the TIMs.

No. 2298241

>>2298237
Yes, it's a space where I largely do not have to deal with scrotes. Am I not allowed to find a space without scrote troons safer than one with?

No. 2298242

>>2298223
Exactly. We will NEVER be as subhuman as our common enemy.

No. 2298243

>>2298197
Disgusting, but I can't help laughing at the emphasis on her ring. This one's married, boys!

No. 2298244

>>2298216
Thanks anon, i mean it. I think im going to start to get into gaming again and wean myself off media that involves romance no matter which gender

No. 2298248

>>2298243
You'd think that would upset the waifufags in the audience kek

No. 2298266

>>2298233
NTAYRT, she's Mexican (from Monterrey specifically) and a /pol/tard who posted on /soc/ as well (kek why do all the cows from here post themselves on /soc/?)

>>2298048
>I tried to read yume content but its terrible
Many of us yumes on LC hate most yume content with a passion, as well. That's why we try to curate the good stuff. It's not a lot, but it does exist (especially when it comes to fanart, see the yumejoshi/POV art thread, for example).
For the record, when someone posted a gif of a certain TL manga that got an anime, anons agreed that the source is trash even though the gif was hot. We're all sick of "female gaze" smut focusing on the female self-insert as if she were an uke in yaoi.

No. 2298312

>>2297780
Except this doujin was drawn by a fujo ROFL

No. 2298313

it’s kinda annoying when people use the term yumejoshi (which specifically means self-inserter) as being interchangeable with any het romance. like het romance stories and yume mean the same thing (it doesn’t)

No. 2298315

>>2298313
Tell it to the people insisting all het is for self insertion.

No. 2298325

>>2298315
yeah I see MC as her own person and I like plot with romance and fanfics for the sex scenes.

No. 2298332

>>2297892
You enjoy scenarios you would partake in if you weren't a woman.

Basically fujos like every single 50shades maledom slop trope, but in a chickenshit roundabout shame-ridden way. Then they sneer at josei slop because they see themselves in it and it hits too close to home.

No. 2298334

>>2298325
Same. If anything, a female MC with personality makes it easier to empathise with her and imagine yourself in her shoes. The overly docile ones who get pulled around as the plot demands are just unnatural to me kek

No. 2298339

>>2298332
what? women into toxic yaoi like seeing the guys in pain, its completly different to women who self insert as docile submissive smol waifs

No. 2298341

>>2298332
I have no desire to partake in it though? I just like looking at it.

No. 2298342

>>2298332
NTA but "seeing a man be toxic and abusive to a woman hits too close to reality and it's too depressing to appeal" is a perfectly reasonable reaction and doesn't seem like shame at all.

No. 2298359

>>2298342
I want to object to this sentiment, but… this is also the basis for a lot of what I like in het ships too, that they don't have tropes that hit too close to home even if appealing. But can't those fujos also enjoy healthy het too?

No. 2298364

>>2298359
What makes you think fujos can't enjoy healthy het too? It's just usually in sfw stuff. The conversation has been about erotic content from the start.

No. 2298370

>>2298364
didn't the conversation turn into fujo vs yume/het shipping/etc in general or was I mistaken?

No. 2298375

>>2298370
It started because someone said fujos are moid centered for not wanting to see women in porn.

No. 2298419


>>2298232

i do it because my nigel is hot and i enjoy sex just like my yaoi men wouldve wanted.
>>2298364
they have a one track mind. My favorite sex scene of all time isnt even from a BL its from Berserk between two straight characters losing their virginity to each other. They even tackle childhood sexual assault and how it impacts your sex life as an adult. Sadly the eclipse ruins the moment but without the eclipse its easily the hottest sex scenes i've read and will continue to read because its between 2 characters that love each other. And thats my issue with Hetero Smut the 2 characters are rarely fleshed out enough for me to even want to see them fuck on each other. The ones with the self inserts make the women such doormats that it takes me out of the story. All of the best Josei with fleshed out romances you have to read a fanfiction in order to get the sex scene you want.

No. 2298436

>thread is 5 hours old
>355 posts and 29 image replies omitted
>on a weekend
What is happening here?

No. 2298437

>>2298436
If you've been using this place for more than 6 months you should already know what happened here.

No. 2298449

>>2298437
I haven't

No. 2298470

>>2298359
>can't those fujos also enjoy healthy het too?
I'm >>2297892, and yes, I do occasionally enjoy het stuff, though it's usually just sfw SOL.

No. 2298471

>>2298436
Autism

No. 2298472

File: 1733718710936.jpg (96.91 KB, 888x499, 9d3xzc.jpg)


No. 2298484

>>2298066
>i'm both 300 pounds and have spent a fortune getting plastic surgery
Anon must think you're Momokun

No. 2298514

>>2298375
> fujos are moid centered for not wanting to see women in porn.
It's not even just porn, it's romance and fiction in general. Why are fujos such big liars? This discourse isn't anything new anyways.

No. 2298520

>>2298359
>But can't those fujos also enjoy healthy het too?
They can't. They're so deep into the self-hate they project that hatred onto other women, call them pickmes for not liking their flavour of porn, all the while being fully into the fujo-to-TIF pipeline.

No. 2298521

>>2298165
>>2298266
Didn't she post herself on /r9k and not soc?

No. 2298522

>>2298520
>So consumed by hatred that she ignores the multiple fujo anons who say they do read het because her narrative will fall apart.

No. 2298588

>>2298522
It's a well known fact that fujos can't stand het ships, seethe at female characters for getting in the way of their gay ships, and get mad when they come across het and self shippers. You're never going to beat those allegations no matter how much you psyop on LC

No. 2298598

>>2298588
>actual human people stating their normal opinions when asked is a psyop

No. 2298694

>>2298522
Sadly sane fujo nonas don't have the time to reeeee and infight for hours as RL keeps them busy, so a lot of the "fujo side" arguments ott rn are pretty schizo and keep giving ammo for the fujocoomer cringe thread. I don't see this infight stopping soon unless the main spergs on both sides start blogging and get banned

No. 2298716

>>2298694
>fujos ott are akshually not representative of us but a certain yuri personalityfag totes is!!!
fujos dont know how to take responsibility of anything. its either not everyones into shota and if it gives them bad rep then they blame it on barafags as if theyre any different

No. 2298818

File: 1733743588847.webp (360.46 KB, 1433x2024, 1000036029.webp)

>>2297780
Het by le based man objectifying fujo who won't stand for josei coomslop portrayal of women, everyone:
>big booba retard MC
>female focus
>endless close-ups of boobs and vag indistinguishable from hentai
>noncon
>men calling her a slut with a dirty pussy
>no pussy eating but gets assfucked
>orgasms from being breathed at

No. 2298925

>>2298818
I don't care if the female is shown naked or naturally from how a normal person would see her because I want to find reason that the ML would be attracted to MC. I just don't want to see closeups of her genitals or unnatural angles that are obviously male gazey.

also assfucking lol. few women actually enjoy that

No. 2298952

>>2298818
I don't understand what this is meant to prove. No one said that yaoi artists were incapable of writing trashy stuff. You can enjoy one title from a writer and dislike another.

No. 2299034

>>2298818
It's almost like fujos have been applying their misogynistic tropes on fiction all along.

No. 2299041

>>2299034
So het counts as yaoi by proxy now just because it's written by someone who also writes BL? There's plenty of equally "offensive" stuff written by people who specialize it het. You're just grasping at straws to justify your sperg rage at the fact that people like something you hate.

No. 2299047

>>2299041
we should stop responding to fujohate at this point. its been established the only people left arguing think that they are on some moral crusade to stop women from getting off to the "wrong" kind of porn, under the delusion that theirs is somehow more based/feminist/stacy

No. 2299131

>>2299047
>to stop women from getting off to the "wrong" kind of porn, under the delusion that theirs is somehow more based/feminist/stacy
So basically what fujos have been doing

No. 2299190

>>2299131
Show me where someone was literally trying to stop you. Fujos have definitely been condescending, and I think it's retarded for them to act like any kind of porn is more "feminist," but antis are the ones running around saying shit like
>As long as one fujo breathes, I'm a hater.
I do not fucking care what type of manga random strangers read. Most fujos (outside of a handful of schizos here) don't, either. You guys are the ones chimping out because some slash fanart occasionally ends up on your Twitter feed by accident. I see shit I don't like on my feed all the time, but I just either blacklist the tag or ignore it and move on. Yaoi isn't feminist, but neither is straight porn. It's porn for fuck's sake.

No. 2299285

>>2299041
how many times do we have to explain this, all bl is toxic heterosexuality with extra steps

No. 2299302

File: 1733769471345.png (2.25 MB, 600x5761, IMG_4026.png)

>>2298026
all the qrts are calling call fujos porn addicted cucks, lmao

No. 2299310

File: 1733769581146.png (1.5 MB, 591x4360, IMG_4027.png)


No. 2299329

>>2299302
I thought that there was a unescapable fujo zeitgeist, guess not.

No. 2299369

>>2299285
But is it honestly any less toxic than standard het stuff? Further, the argument that it's "functionally straight" is based on an incredibly outdated, surface-level perception of BL. Therein lies the problem with criticizing something you have very little personal familiarity with and have a vendetta against purely for retarded fandom drama and aesthetic reasons. You can "explain" it as many times as you want, that doesn't make it true or even particularly convincing kek.

No. 2299407

>>2299302
Inch resting how anons here have contempt for Twitter's cancer userbase except when they say something they personally agree with. The opinions of random retards in QRTs are functionally worthless.

Also, Arcane sucks and I'm sick of hearing this one anon constantly sperg about this shitty TV show and petty shipping drama in its fandom. When you do nothing but hop between the latest FOTM garbage, you shouldn't be surprised when you're surrounded by speds and TikTok retards. Why don't you try watching something that came out more than five years ago for a change?

No. 2299417

File: 1733771697204.png (788.84 KB, 655x1660, IMG_1035.png)

>>2299302
meanwhile fujotifs openly admit they trooned because of yaoi

No. 2299423

>>2299417
Did you mean to post this in the fujocoomer cringe thread?

No. 2299427

>>2299285
DA, although I'm not a fujo I have noticed that yaoi copies het, but the appeal of yaoi is that it's a moid being degraded instead of a woman. A fujoyume could replace the "seme" with a woman and she'd get femdom with the moid still being degraded and being slutty and/or turned into a slut.

All yaoi can be argued as being toxic heterosexuality but it's only based if the woman reading it self-inserts as the dominant one, most yaoi has the POV of the seme anyway with the focus looking at a submissive male, so fujos who author their own BL and the audience who buys it clearly have their own tastes. Yaoi, from my perspective, is closer to femdom than maledom.

One thing I know is that Japanese commercial works have a lot more editing than Korean ones, so that's why Korean femdom/yaoi gets more brutal, meanwhile in JP works the editing team meddles a lot and tells the authors to tone it down to appeal to the masses. For example you would never get a Japanese version of Sadistic Beauty.

No. 2299439

>>2299329
Decades of yaoi paddle gigglesquee followed by aydens have finally become so annoying everyone is officially tired of them.

No. 2299441

>>2299427
okay, what about the fact that the seme degreading the uke is still a man, while the uke is almost always hyper feminized

No. 2299473

File: 1733772447269.jpg (51.73 KB, 480x480, 1000003237.jpg)

>>2299441
>almost always hyper feminized

No. 2299485

>>2299427
Where is all this based man degrading fujoshitism though? All I see is embarrassing melodramatic cockworship and "protecting" uwu abused men or whatever. Even the "abusive" toxic slop they consume seems to revolve around licking the wounds of the poor moids rather than reveling in their suffering. The schizo that TLed sadistic beauty (you know, the one shitting up the panels with her wokscold commentary about poor Minho) is a fujo, who sounds like every fujo ever in the comments when the moid gets hurt uwu.

No. 2299489

File: 1733772595869.png (358.95 KB, 595x723, IMG_4020.png)

>>2299427
so picrel would be an example of what you mean, one male character is feminized and the female character is masculinized, at no point is there anything resembling a character wanting to please a woman, it's all focused on the feminized male, how do you reconcile that?

No. 2299500

>>2299489
Reconcile it….with what?

No. 2299545

>>2299485
The author is also a fujo, doesn't what happen to him count?
If you want recs for abuse, then go to the fujo thread and ask.

No. 2299573

>>2299473
Tbh the "actually I used to be a fujo but all I saw were hyper feminized stuff" says more about their own viewing habits than anything. Algorithms feed you what you really want, it looks at what you like and who you interact with. If its only giving you hyperfeminized shit? Well idk.

No. 2299581

>>2299489
what makes you say that male is feminized other than the fact he's being fucked?

No. 2299593

Why do people in this thread keep acting like fujos have zero tolerance for het ships? Straight couples are already in 99% of media. Any time I watch a TV series or movie or read a book, it's likely to include het romance. It's impossible to escape and it's highly unlikely anyone dislikes every het couple they read about. So maybe I don't want to read or write porn about like, idk Elizabeth and Mr Darcy, that doesn't mean I don't enjoy the romance. Obviously I'm gonna rely on fandom for m/m content because it's not already in canon like most straight ships.

Honestly all this comes down to is hetshippers who are grossed out by yaoi being jealous and seething that they get scraps in fandom. But you have everything in canon so just go watch literally anything on netflix and you'll get your preference prioritized.

No. 2299602

>>2299593
fujos have accepted that het women like het romance but the antifujos cant accept that some het (and non-het women) like BL. thats all this has become

No. 2299643

>>2299581
he's visibly smaller

No. 2299649

>>2299643
That's it? Manlets are women lol

No. 2299652

>>2299643
people come in different sizes, whats your point? if he was bigger than wolverine you'd automatically call wolverine the feminized one?

No. 2299657

>>2299643
im done arguing with people that think like this lmao

No. 2299678

File: 1733775265891.jpeg (25.92 KB, 417x498, 453603458_3712172309048275_719…)

Ultra fem uke Wolverine

No. 2299689

>>2299678
It kind of looks like they cast a TIF as a body double kek.

No. 2299690

>>2298694
you only get banned for blogging on cow threads
>>2299652
wolverine’s canonically a manlet so I guess he is “hyper-feminized” KEK

No. 2299707

>>2299689
Pretty sure it was an actual just short guy lol

No. 2299727

>>2299678
Does this mean Wade is the seme

No. 2299862

>>2299489
This feels like a cope to make Jean, Scott and Logan more interesting since they’re the most boring ass characters.

No. 2299880

>>2299593
fujo's don't often tolerate het ships precisely because they're in most media. Then they act like het is boring and misogynist and poorly written. Lol and when I go to fandom to talk about the show, I don't want most the fandom gushing over a non-canon ship because it's uwu gay. Granted they do that because the het couple is poorly written and the show is misogynist so I don't engage in those types of fandoms in the first place.

No. 2299888

>>2299727
He generally is except with Cable.

No. 2299893

File: 1733777656393.jpg (38.78 KB, 384x540, canis.jpg)

>>2299441
>the uke is always hyper feminized
Anon, tell me which of the characters in picrel is the "hyper feminine uke" based on the designs alone

No. 2299923


No. 2299930

File: 1733777999951.jpeg (344.85 KB, 1080x1872, IMG_2301.jpeg)

>>2299923
Not even a josou seme?

No. 2299955

File: 1733778205021.jpeg (66.59 KB, 436x750, rbuugxy9d3fc1.jpeg)

Fuck it, Spideypool thread

No. 2299968

>>2299955
The dynamic where Spidey is the top just using Deadpool to get off because he knows how big of a crush he has on him is hot. I love it when men get taken advantage of.

No. 2299991

>>2299439
>reee yaoi paddles
I've been going to anime cons for fifteen years and I've yet to see someone actually walking around with one (even at cons where yaoi paddles aren't banned.) They were a short lived meme from like 20 years ago. It's like getting angry about glomping in 2024.

No. 2300027

File: 1733779669894.jpg (958.22 KB, 1440x3120, 1000001542.jpg)

What do anons think of this? It was in response to some tweet about adding tifs to BL.

No. 2300047

>>2300027
yes because they arent fucking real, they are cartoons not 3DPD. Thats like saying anime girls arent real women because they act like men think women are. No one has ever said anime girls are moids lite.

No. 2300049

>>2300027
I’ve seen similar sentiments from JP fujos before, iirc it was in the previous thread.

No. 2300059

>>2300027
I think she's over-generalizing a little bit, but I agree with the overall sentiment. The characters in yaoi, even the semes, are often written more like women than like men. I'd still describe it as gay, but not in any kind of realistic way. I remember seeing a post on Tumblr a while back that said something to the effect of
>women write men with so much more care and nuance than men actually have, while men write women like they've never spoken to a woman in their lives
And I think that definitely holds true for any kind of romance. Gay moids irl are into like. Chest hair and musclepigs and anonymous sex in public bathrooms. Yaoi writers are into slow burn feelingsy shit.

No. 2300065

>>2299991
Fujo reading comprehension remains undefeated

No. 2300113

File: 1733781726586.jpg (70.07 KB, 720x711, dgoi4bp-57580497-da1d-4af1-a72…)

>>2300027
>>2300059
Tbh I think this is a bit of a "you need to get out of your zone more" since anime men are generally written not like men, even the ones meant for men.
Like even isekai shit like Overlord or SAO, if anybody actually read those, the mcs think in a similiar way. They're more demure, more cowardly and thoughtful. Like look at harem protagonist. They're not like real men.
Same thing goes for shoujo and Josei, Natsume isn't written like a guy, neither is somebody like Ginko from Mushishi.

No. 2300201

>>2300065
It was just an aside jfc.

No. 2300211

>>2300113
the women in anime/manga dont act like women irl either idg this argument

No. 2300224

>>2300211
Honestly, I think it could be said for fiction in general. Do people think Dean and Sam Winchester, or the cast in Euphoria or whatever, act like normal irl men and women?

No. 2300575

File: 1733789868510.jpeg (40.39 KB, 445x619, image0.jpeg)

>>2299968
Nonna sama you’re ruining my groomer fantasies with that…

No. 2300582

>>2300575
I hate Tom Holland Spidey sorry nonita.

No. 2300586

>>2300113
I hate that I think he’s cute, if this manga was based they’d have the 100th girlfriend be a girl with 99 boyfriends that she makes fuck each other but we all know otakus would set the entire nation on fire if they did that.

No. 2300594

File: 1733790104234.jpeg (314.3 KB, 1000x1473, image0.jpeg)

>>2300582
It’s okay, I like the comic one (specifically with this haircut and thick eyebrows) more anyway.

No. 2300633

>>2297552
>Most of the time the MC is also just a plain faceless woman
God I wish this was true.

No. 2300793

>>2300586
I'm 100% sure theyre going to pull a Rayearth and the final girlfriend will be you, the viewer, who has been at his side all along! Alongside a little place to write your name.

No. 2300804

>>2300793
That's fuckin gay dude, the readers were made gay by reading it.

No. 2300844

File: 1733794291842.jpg (62.6 KB, 626x409, Yv5.jpg)

>>2300804
It fits the anime's vibe (retardo comedy)

No. 2300875

>Are lesbian fujoshi actually a thing?
yes anime boys are just objects. you can google 'anime character vs human being'. there is no similarity unless you're dumb
>>b-but the idea of a man = a man ?!
okay and i guess loving running over pedestrians in gta 5 means you want to do that irl

>Why do fujos look at, draw and talk about yaoi together, while moids who enjoy hentai do so completely alone in their gooncaves?

some fujos are solitary, many men do "goon" with other men (i'm prety sure there are regular "fap together~ <3" threads on /trash/, they have entire imageboards and telegrams dedicated to getting one another off, etc.)

>Are women who enjoy "male character with chopped tits and/or a vag" actually fujoshi? If not, what are they?

the way they draw men is just a male with a pussy and scars, it's like the fantasy of a cuntboy but put through the gendie grinder. as they're basically men and the pussy is just there so they can self-insert better, i'll say yeah they're fujos (if they're into bl content, danmei webtoons etc. not really westoid slop like shartstopper)

>Why do you think so meny supposed straight content made for women caters to men?

horseshoe theory and female socialization. a female's place of power is being beautiful and young: men love beautiful and young women. heterosexual dynamics demand tiddy hamster x big daddy. many women enjoy being the tiddy hamster this is the ultimate blackpill. most women LOVE being treated as "women", that sociocultural idea.

>Do you think there is a problem when it comes to female sexualization when it comes to josei smut?

yes and no it depends on how angry i am at whomever i'm arguing against and how high i want my horse to be. it really doesn't fucking matter though

No. 2300912

Kek wonder how many of the "NLOG pickme" spouting fujos are caping right now for the CEO killer MRA scrote wanting him to be gay/bisexual or even wanting to fuck him.

No. 2300944

>>2300875

>okay and i guess loving running over pedestrians in gta 5 means you want to do that irl


ok by that logic lolishota has no bearing on what you're sexually attracted to IRL. There's a difference between cartoon violence and gooning to what is for all intents and purposes, a child

and to your spoiler, sounds like a really edgy conclusion. we've only had about a century of having rights and means to live independently of men, and you jump to conclusions because most women still don't give a shit about women as a class. Like hell they would, we've had millennia of programming

No. 2300952

>>2300944
on that same note, i'm still hating on the "caters to men" question. Some people think having the attractive naked MC in the panel or cover is catering

No. 2300986

>>2300912
do you let fujos live 24/7 in your mind or what, none of those faghags are fujos. They sound more like tradthots.

No. 2301195

>>2300944
While I find lolishota to be repulsive and I dislike seeing it, on a purely free-speech level, I don't think any kind of art should be illegal unless children or animals were harmed in the actual making of it. I don't know much about the research that happens in this area (anons who do, feel free to share) but is there a difference in likelihood-to-offend between pedophiles who do view drawn cp and those who don't? I feel like the ones who do view those things would be more likely to offend because they're positively reinforcing their sexual associations with children. But on the other hand, could drawings theoretically be a deterrent to exchanging actual, photographed CP? If the drawn alternative exists, would more guys go with that instead of seeking out images of actual, real-life kids on the dark web? Or is it a "gateway drug" situation, where eventually the drawn version is no longer enough and they start to want photos? Basically, I'm struggling to square my free-speech-absolutism with my overwhelming desire to prevent the victimization of children.

All of this is in reference to moids, mind you. Women are extremely unlikely to molest kids or obtain CP, especially without a male accomplice. I think discussions of the potential harms of loli/shota content should focus mostly on how moids create and consume it, since moids are the demographic actually hurting kids.

No. 2301258

>>2301195
that's a different subject altogether, my point was, idk where exactly lesbian fujos get off to seeing two guys fuck or kiss, but something's causing that. They're not just objects, there representations of things you register as clearly male

No. 2301272

Idk about othe fujoshi but for me it was always the concept of strong love and attraction that exists between two people regardless their physical sex that was the main appeal of BL. Combined with the fact that I'm not attracted to women's physicality (while I do consider women beautiful and attractive it doesn't turn me on) is the reason why I was more interested in BL than yuri. And het relationships are tainted with the basic drive to conceive a child therefore it's not purely just desire or love for the other person.

No. 2301281

>>2300027
Tbh this kind of proves anti fujos correct when they talk about the whole "these are literally just women" thing. It's "straight porn" but make it "gay."

No. 2301317

>>2300952
>>2301195
We all know loli/shotafag moids are actual pedophiles and 2D child pornography doesn't actually help stop them from seeing real children as attractive. If anything, many lolicon artists draw inspiration from real life cases of child sexual abuse with serial rapist level of detail. Take Geiger Counter for example (where the infamous depressed loli reaction pic comes from) or mossa's Baraag porn where many of his pedo pieces look lifted straight from real child pornography or feature a scary closeness to real life violent porn and rape fantasies (he also showed himself that he references child gravure on Twitter iirc) With such a level of obsession with real CP among male lolifags, you'd have to extend the question to real CP wrt whether consuming it actually stops pedophiles from offending, but of course you don't even need to ask that since both the production and distribution of real CP harms real children.

But we all know about pedo moids. The question here is about female lolifags and shotafags. I don't care that they're women and thus less likely to molest children. They might be highly unlikely to be as bad as moids, but that doesn't mean they're not bad at all or that I should accept their little kid fetish. They're still attracted to sexualized representations of children. If you have a husbando and like to see him naked and sporting an erection, you're attracted to men. Likewise if you often look at pornographic drawn content of characters that were designed to have child bodies, aesthetics and behavior, you're attracted to children, period. Even if it's an "idealized" version of children.

No. 2301332

File: 1733805673397.jpeg (118.08 KB, 680x1000, IMG_4090.jpeg)

>>2300027
I thought we all knew this!? I’ve known this since at least a teen. It might not be as clear in today’s BL but the early 2000s and and 90s BL I grew up on. The uke was heavily female coded. A big example I could think of is the Uke in Okane ga Nai. But there are countless examples especially if you grew up watching earlier BL. Level C is another example. But new age fujos aren’t watching the old school BL to notice. They are also mainly reading like Korean BL since it’s more raunchy, in color , and updates way more frequently. Korean BL I don’t think has that problem as much. I don’t think newer BL you can see the female coding the same.But if you even listen to old school drama cds the ukes sound indistinguishable from women. But nowadays I think because people associate gay men with being effeminate and the ukes stopped trying to sound like women, they don’t clock the female coding as much. But honestly I always tend to skip over BL where the uke acts blatantly like a girl or I drop it because otherwise I’d just read Shoujo/Josei. You can also tell they are female coded because the Seme always denies that he’s gay and they focus too much on nipple play. That’s why I enjoy new age BL more because both the seme and Uke act like stereotypes of gay/straight males instead of the stereotype of a docile women.

No. 2301342

>>2301281
>random answer in english: ignored completely
>random answer in japanese: omg this proves it 100% the nippon has spoken

No. 2301352

>>2300952
Sorry I replied to you earlier, I meant to write an actual response.

Nta but if the female main character in what is supposed to be masturbation material for straight women takes more than 50% of the focus on the cover, with her being semi naked and blushing with a submissive and sexually suggestive pose, while the male character is not as naked, blushing or suggestive as her, then yes, it's internalized moidgaze. It doesn't make sense even if you use the cope that you're not self inserting at all and just want to see "two hot people fuck" like a fujo being a non-participating voyeur, you are a straight woman and should naturally not give a fuck about the woman's body and prefer the focus to be entirely on the man's. But women are conditioned to get off to their own objectification, as if a sexy naked woman was a prerequisite for your to get wet, and that shouldn't be the case. If you absolutely need to know that the female character is as attractive as the male to feel like she "deserves" him, then perhaps you just want to have sex in real life with a moid who actually loves you and is worth being attractive for, but these are just smut comics and there shouldn't be a need to make the female character super hot and the visual focus at the same time. Non-Stacies can and should enjoy their smut without having to worry about a fictional moid's standards. I have no problem with the female MC being hot with huge tits if the sex scenes are mostly focused on a hot male being objectified. Sadistic Beauty does it right imo

No. 2301359

>>2301342
No matter how much proof you post here even if it's from actual Japanese sources, they refuse to acknowledge it until a random Japanese person on Twitter confirms all of it by saying the same thing kek

No. 2301380

>>2301359
But this should just be common knowledge for Fujos we are losing recipes in real time

No. 2301393

>>2300875
futashit is never yuri/yaoi/het whatever, it’s it’s own thing. tbh I’d say trannification is just modern woke-approved hetbending. some people have always obsessively hetbended every gay ship and they still do the same thing except now they just call it trans so no one can call them homophobic or whatever

No. 2301435

>>2301332
>honestly I always tend to skip over BL where the uke acts blatantly like a girl or I drop it because otherwise I’d just read Shoujo/Josei.
Same. The issue isn't even necessarily just that it feels "too het," it's also that the characters begin to fall into these very flat, bland archetypes and it makes the whole dynamic way too predictable. Even outside of the context of gender coding or whatever, I don't like BL mangas that are overly reliant on tropes or clichés. I want to read stories that will engage and surprise me, you know? And I think other readers feel the same way, which is why semes and ukes are so much less stereotypical than they used to be.

However, the whole debate going on in this thread is over how yaoi is currently, not how it was fifteen or twenty years ago. And honestly? I don't think female artists should be constrained by how "feminist" their creations are, especially in the context of silly escapism like yaoi. It's honestly ridiculous that women are held to such disproportionately high moral standards even in contexts as intimate as the smutty romance we read for fun. And a lot of the people scrutinizing us based on these unfair standards are other women, who you'd think would fucking know better. We denigrate each other over the most insignificant things while moids are running around fucking microwaved watermelons and buying strangers' used bathwater.

No. 2301506

>>2301359
>>2301342
Of course I'm going to take the opinion of someone who lives in the actual country it originated with a bit more "understanding" on the subject. What's wrong with that, exactly?

No. 2301518

>>2301506
Didn't take any of the answers from Japanese fujoshi authors or any of the series posted before, what were wrong with those answers then?

No. 2301533

>>2297688
I’m kind of concerned to learn that most other women don’t feel this way. So it’s not normal to get off to being the one who’s being seductive, being hot, and turning the other party on? For me being seen as attractive and having the ability to seduce someone into sex is one of my main motivations for having sex, because otherwise I would just masturbate 100% of the time. Turning the other party on by being attractive is a huge part of the appeal for me. Does that mean I have something wrong or uncommon with my sexuality? Which motivations for sex do women usually have if being desired isn’t a common core component?

No. 2301539

>>2301533
It's normal, just cucked. Expecting men to be attractive instead of us for once in our lives is uncommon but based.

No. 2301556

>>2301533
I don't think either is uncommon. Some women get turned on by being sexy, some women don't.
It's like having sex outside, but not as degenerate. Some people find the thought vomit inducing, some find it hot.

No. 2301686

File: 1733831355083.jpg (1.44 MB, 1080x5391, piano rape.jpg)

>>2298588
>seethe at female characters for getting in the way of their gay ships.
Why is it that only fujos get shat on for this, when pretty much every other shipperfag does the exact same thing?
Evageeks is a more-than-decade-old Asushin echo chamber full of 40-year-old weirdos, like Reichu and a Brazilian guy named Felipe, who obsessively edits Eva wikis to erase all mentions of Kaworu because he gets in the way of Asuka/Shinji. They also push the narrative that Kaworu is an evil groomer manipulator.
Chinese Alhaitham yumes mass-reported Alhaitham/Kaveh shipbait to the CCP because they felt Kaveh was stealing Alhaitham from them.
Pretty much every straight shipper, like NaruSaku shippers who hate Hinata.

These are just random examples off the top of my head, but I find it strange that only fujos face so much scrutiny for ridiculous behavior >>2299302 while other shippers doing the same thing are largely ignored.

No. 2301700

>>2301506
DA if you are only interested in answers from Japanese fujos, why are you posting in a thread asking English-speaking fujos how they view BL? What stopped you from just going to a Japanese image board from the start, or keyword searching terms on twitter and using google translate until you were satisfied with an answer? I don't get this logic.

No. 2301746

>>2301686
>who obsessively edits Eva wikis to erase all mentions of Kaworu because he gets in the way of Asuka/Shinji
Never watched this bullshit, but isn't that faggot in only like a single episode before dying? kek you shouldn't need to be too obsessive to delete all mentions of him, plus I wouldn't be surprised if fujotards who act like he's a main character misleadingly edited the wiki to make it all about their epic faggots.

No. 2301833

>>2301539
Glad you finally agree that being a corner voyeur is the abnormal, autistic preference.

No. 2301892

>>2301746
>to make it all about their epic faggots.
Seems like you just hate fujos because you don’t like gays or gay stuff in general kek.

No. 2301907

>>2301317
I want to see some data on whether this relationship is causal or just correlation, though. My question is whether guys who are already a danger to kids seek loli out, or whether viewing loli increases someone's likelihood to hurt children. Also, I think as far as psychology and sexuality goes, there's very little "we all know."

No. 2301915

>>2301746
I'll never understand why people feel the need to give opinions on shit they've never read/seen. Kaworu has narrative significance because he's ostensibly a Jesus analog. He's an angel (the race of aliens attacking Earth) with the appearance of a human boy. I can't get further into it without spoilers. NGE was written on the fly, so a lot of characters get introduced suddenly instead of being built up to. The rebuilds have a lot of problems, but they significantly expanded Kaworu's screen time and built up to him more.

No. 2301921

>>2301892
That's honestly the impression I get from a couple (but not all of) the antis in here. Some antis actually use some semblance of logic, while others are clearly just seething with rage at occasionally seeing gay drawings. I'm not going to play the "homophobia" card, because we've established that yaoi boys don't resemble real gay men anyway, but yeah, a few of these antis are coming across very socially conservative and puritanical.

No. 2301922

>>2301686
I see yumes (husbando and waifufags alike) get made fun of when they act stupidly over love interests but I’ll bet it’s because some fujos like to pretend it’s a moral thing over the writing even though their pairings are mostly fueled by headcanon shit (bkdk recently lol). Het shippers like Ichirukis (actual book burners lmafo) and NaruSakus also get treated similarly when het pairings are more popular in story. There’s also FF7 between Clotis and Cleriths (I wish I never interacted with the fandom)

No. 2301924

File: 1733845970739.png (704.72 KB, 601x670, 1708468923235.png)

>>2301746
>never watched this bullshit
then why are you commenting?

No. 2301928

>>2301539
why is it cucked to think both should be attractive? Romantic love is shallow, it's more believable if the MC has appeal.

No. 2301931

>>2301317
>If you have a husbando and like to see him naked and sporting an erection, you're attracted to men. Likewise if you often look at pornographic drawn content of characters that were designed to have child bodies, aesthetics and behavior, you're attracted to children, period. Even if it's an "idealized" version of children.

Therefore by definition, fujo's who call themselves lesbian and get off to BL hentai are… attracted to men to some degree. Right?

No. 2301935

>>2301272
I get wanting to see two guys kiss because the more the better, but Christ.

Do you read any romance at all? How often does the het couple mention wanting children? Yeah. Isn't that just your bias? Do you personally see that romantic het love always involves children? That that's all they want? Also, why does romantic love have to transcend sex?

No. 2301959

>>2301924
It’s been a while since I’ve seen this image wow

No. 2301967

>>2301924 i don't think Kaworu was ever shown to be attracted to him, at least in the TV series

No. 2301986

>>2301892
Even if that were the case, so what? this is an anonymous imageboard, we don't have to praise the allmighty gays here. I don't hate fujos nor fags, you're both just very annoying most of the time.
>>2301915
>>2301924
Am I wrong, though? the faggot still dies after a single episode kek I don't care about your retarded anime and never will. Your faux deep lolibait will never be of any significance to me, hence why I can comment on it without having watched it.

No. 2302003

>>2301967
He tells Shinji he likes/loves him and that he deserves affection and they take a bath together. In other drafts of the episode they kiss. It's even more explicit in the manga. I'm not here to crusade for this pairing but I also don't think it's fair for fujos to be shat on for shipping it. Or for Eva wikis to change the context around Kaworu.
>>2301986
>Your faux deep lolibait
stay in your lane and shut up about things you know nothing about

No. 2302004

>>2301931
Fujofeces don't work for me because I simply am not interested in watching cock going into an asshole, but at least there's cock. I understand if some insane, degenerate straight women could conceivably be into men fucking other men because it involves genitalia that biologically interests them. But most sane, nonparaphilic people will want to watch the kind of sex they themselves would be able to partake in. This is self-evident.

But lesbians? What does a lesbian get from watching a penis go into - not even a vagina - but asshole? And a man's asshole at that? Man's dick in a man's anus? What exactly is in it for them?

No. 2302016

>>2301931
or they could…not be attracted to it? it's really that simple yet antis still don't get it.

No. 2302017

File: 1733850128738.gif (273.21 KB, 200x200, 200w.gif)

>>2301986
>I don't hate fujos nor fags

No. 2302019

>>2302003
Cranky because I'm right, arentcha? Go goon to your faux deep lolis in skin tight latex suits
>>2302017
Why are millennials so unfunny, did you get this from the reddit reaction gifs?(infight bait)

No. 2302022

File: 1733850640582.gif (537.24 KB, 400x289, retardalert.gif)

>>2302019
did you really just call shinji and kaworu lolis??

No. 2302024

File: 1733850815157.jpg (24.33 KB, 500x500, c6047475670a223e4411969da1f942…)

>>2302019
>>2301986
>NGE
>faux deep lolibait
Please stop you're giving me way too much second hand embarrassment

No. 2302029

>>2302024
>NGE
>not faux deep lolibait
You're giving ME full body cringe.

No. 2302030

>>2302022
>>2302024
No, I'm calling Asuka and the other one lolis. Can you stop with the cringy millenial reaction pics? You're giving me secondhand embarrassment. Aren't you a bit too old to be into yaoi or discourse anyways?

No. 2302032

File: 1733851180876.jpg (170.67 KB, 700x989, 1000057535.jpg)

>>2302022
I think anon is trying to say Eva is lolibait because it has high school girls in it, which makes pretty much all anime AND a lot of Western Media lolibait since all of it is infested by teenage characters

No. 2302041

>>2302030
DA but asuka and rei aren't lolis they're actually under the "moe" umbrella of anime girl character design. Which is still degen (to me) but it's not loli which is little girls (a crime).

No. 2302042

>>2302030
Nah, but you really gotta appreciate fujo logic tho:

>Big booby woman existing: goonerbait

>Small booby woman existing: lolibait
>Le subversive harem anime known for its iconic tweens in latex: nothing to see here, officer

Is this the power of kawoshin brainrot and old lady nostalgia?

No. 2302043

>>2302019
>confidently telling people what they think about a piece of media they’ve never even seen

Kek you definitely sound like a zoomer

No. 2302044

>>2302041
14 is a crime too, hope this helps

No. 2302047

>>2302030
>>2302042
>Aren't you a bit too old to be into yaoi
>old lady nostalgia
Why do anti-fujos always go for the age thing

No. 2302051

>>2302047
Because your double standard for le scathing media criticism here can only be explained by nostalgia and attachment to your retarded fag ship. Evangelion, however enjoyable or iconic, is and always was grade A pseud fanservice slop for turbo neckbeards, just like The Beatles were the braindead kpoop of their time.

No. 2302052

>>2302047
Because they’re young retards anon. The anti fujos always tend to be zoomers so I’m wondering who’s convincing them that fujos are literally worse than hitler kek

No. 2302053

>>2302052
the anti-fujo thing was started by tifs but others latched onto it so they can be anti-female hobbies. just like with shit like twilight anything women like is automatically labeled cringe

No. 2302060

>>2302053
>anything women like is automatically labeled cringe
Most self aware fujo

No. 2302063

>>2302060
not a fujo but ok. it's true that any media women like is labelled cringe. all ya books, liveslop tv shows like pretty little liars degrassi etc, romance movies. you're not nuanced for hating on media made for the female demographic it's the most mainstream braindead take

No. 2302065

>>2302030
You do realize that you're allowed to watch anime from before you were born, right? Like it's not illegal to retroactively watch old stuff, especially if it's popular and influential?

No. 2302066

File: 1733852799399.jpg (43.67 KB, 600x685, 1646701487473.jpg)

It makes me laugh that literally all female spaces end up devolving into holier than thou moralfagging circles where one woman gets pissed she gets moralfagged so she responds by moralfagging back and it just goes back and forth. The fact we have 4 threads fighting about anime porn instead of doing something productive is pathetic to say the least. Female socialization in a nutshell.

No. 2302069

>>2302030
>Asuka and the other one
>the other one
You've got to be baiting at this point kek

No. 2302070

>>2302016
This, don't see what's so mindboggingly hard to understand that you can love a couple and see sex scenes and… not masturbate. You do it all the time with het.
Fo you think everyone who watched Oppenheimer was heterosexual because there's a sex scene so they must have gone off to it?

No. 2302072

>>2302066
kek women spend so much time moralfagging each other so much meanwhile it's men who commit 99% of violent crimes it doesn't make sense clown world

No. 2302078

>>2302066
The female desire to be a hivemind but the female reality of being unique individuals.

No. 2302079

>>2302066
Nothing makes me feel like a retarded NLOG more than refusing to participate in needless moralfagging. It happens online, offline, in academia, in years-long friendships, I bet the hairballs and beetles in my sink drain are probably moralfagging over the shape of soap scum pieces right now.

No. 2302089

>>2302079
I feel you, nonna. Moralfagging is why I don't participate in fandom anymore and deleted all my social media. For some reason a lot of women think consooooming (insert fictional media here) has some impact on morality over actual tangible things like being a good person and doing good deeds irl instead of tweeting about anime online

No. 2302090

>>2302042
>Le subversive harem anime known for its iconic tweens in latex: nothing to see here, officer
>14 is a crime too
yes please try reporting Evangelion porn to the police i'm sure everyone making Kawoshin or Asuka smut is shaking right now
>>2302066
There are men committing violent sex crimes or grooming minors into sending them nudes or some other irredeemable action right now. And then we have anons here pearlclutching over dirty degenerate fujos making cartoon porn.
>>2302070
It's strange how people assume yaoi (and yume stuff) is all porn when it's an entire genre mostly around character interactions

No. 2302099

>>2302016
>Watching porn you can't get off to about people you're not attracted to because of le couple dynamics
This is the demographic calling normal women asexual

No. 2302106

>>2302099
Your porn might be nothing but coom, but some yaoi come with a thing called story.
Many get sfw nonsexual adaptions that do pretty well.

No. 2302110

>>2302099
I'm not a fujo but when I do read yaoi I usually skip all the sex scenes. I skip smut in books I read too, I just don't enjoy it and it doesn't turn me on in the slightest but it doesn't trigger me enough to stop reading cute romance stories. I imagine you also don't have to get off to something to admire it's intrinsic appeal. You could theoretically read the porn scenes and not get off to it at all, it could just be a genuine appreciation of fiction, writing/art. Women aren't men so we don't need to coom to everything we see

No. 2302118

File: 1733854237980.png (469.75 KB, 1439x989, xittermelty.png)

Why do twitterfags get upset over irrelevant fan content? The original tweet had over 20k likes before the OP deleted it because retards were leaving hate comments on the fic. I checked the fic writer's account, and she has also written for Furuba, so it’s not like she’s solely fixating on yaoi content. But the average xitterfag sees one tweet without context and then proceeds to have a melty over it.

No. 2302122

>>2302118
I miss the days of "don't like don't read", how was such a simple philosophy lost to time. Twitter fags never learned2scroll when something clearly wasn't made for them

No. 2302129

>>2302072
I know. I've pointed this exact thing out multiple times in this thread already. We're sitting around shaming each other for looking at retarded anime drawings while moids are killing women and raping cats.

No. 2302132

>>2302118
kekkkk thats so funny

No. 2302138

File: 1733854538835.jpg (109.65 KB, 1080x704, 1733621956908.jpg)

>>2302118
>about women
the game has countless male qties so yuritroons are on suicide watch, infinity nikki will never be their cringe yuri porn utopia

No. 2302141

>>2302118
>reee a single human being on ao3 engaged with a piece of art in a way I disagree with
I envy people who have so few actual problems in their lives that they have the headspace to get mad over something this meaningless

No. 2302147

>>2302118
they're all talk and no action. why don't they write their own fanfics instead of malding about yaoi? they're no better than the people they accuse of making everything about men at that point

No. 2302148

>>2302118
>stupid fujos spending their own free time writing about characters who romantically and sexually interest them for fun, why won't they make something I want?? so annoying

No. 2302150

>>2302047
Idk but it's kind of funny that they purport to hate yaoi for being misogynistic while constantly calling other women fat, ugly, and old. The misogyny is coming from inside the house kek

No. 2302171

>>2302106
>>2302110
That's usually when I ask to give me an example of a yaoi story so deeply moving and impossible to find anywhere else you just have to put up with cock buttsex

No. 2302172

File: 1733855279050.png (10.29 KB, 492x107, gfsdgsg.png)

>>2302138
Kek. It’s funny how these individuals won’t talk about incels who are mad because Nikki doesn’t have boob jiggle and can’t be upskirted but will instead engage in performative activism over fujo content.

No. 2302176

>>2302172
>breaking gender norms by attempting to conform to the gender norms of the opposite sex
?

No. 2302181

>>2302150
Men can be Star Trek fans or comic book fans or make model trains in their basement as old men, but being a millennial fujoshi is sooooo shameful and embarrassing. The second women get married or turn 25, they should drop all childish hobbies and take up something more socially acceptable. Can't imagine older women engaging with sexual media for fun, yuck! We gotta analyze and come up with every morally valid justification for why women are allowed to have fun

No. 2302182

>>2302172
if twaw then how is it gnc when you're a woman being feminine… Unless?

No. 2302183

>>2302171
Genuinely what is wrong with people liking stuff. This is like getting mad at people who like vampires saying
>give me an example of a vampire story so deeply moving and impossible to find anywhere else you just have to put up with light cannibalism
Motherfucker, they like the story and the vampires. It's not that deep. Let people like stuff, Jesus H.

No. 2302186

>>2302181
The day I turned 25, all of my yaoi mangas spontaneously combusted and I suddenly became fascinated with coupon clipping, bathroom renovation, and mid-size SUVs.

No. 2302188

>>2302171
That's because when you're so obviously hostile against it, nobody expects you to actually give the benefit of the doubt and read anything yaoi in good faith.
This is like a moid asking for one book written by a woman that's actually good and not expecting him to laugh at any emotional scene as a "woman moment" and shitting on every single nitpick as "this is why women can't write." You'd be stupid to rec something, and even with that people posted series that would be palatable to antifujos that show off writing styles.

No. 2302190

>>2302183
I can see how pretending people are "mad" and not amused by your lesbian LARPing would soften the blow.

No. 2302193

>>2302190
What an Earth are you talking about? I'm not a lesbian, nor have I ever claimed to be. I didn't even mention lesbians. I was talking about vampires.

No. 2302201

>>2302188
Perhaps. Or you know that it's identical to all the other slop you sneer at and don't want to embarrass yourself any more than you already did.

No. 2302220

>>2302193
Your early Alzheimer's is not my problem, check the reply chain.

No. 2302234

>>2302201
>don't want to embarrass yourself any more than you already did.
>even with that people posted series that would be palatable to antifujos that show off writing styles.

No. 2302237

>>2302234
Where? Link.

No. 2302279

>>2302118
All the non-fujos are too busy actually playing the game

No. 2302287

>>2302237
Read thread, here's one. >>2297729

No. 2302293

File: 1733858651658.jpeg (73.93 KB, 411x600, given-01-taschenbuch-natsuki-k…)

>>2302237
nta but I think Given is pretty good and isn't even porny. The character dynamics are really interesting imo and it touches on tragedy and death of a loved one in an interesting way but I know a lot of anons would disagree with me

No. 2302302

>>2302118
They will do literally anything besides pick up a pen. If you get a game full of women and still don't feel compelled to write and instead seethe at the people who do, it's time to look inwards.

No. 2302326

>>2302302
Samefag but there are literal coomer incels who are trying to invade Nikki but if course they will never ever have the courage to harass those men off the internet, it's always a woman minding her own business they attack.

No. 2302352

>>2302138
They keep telling on themselves, Nikki series lore was never all-women but women were the focus of the story

No. 2302394

>>2301924
I'm on the yume side but it'll never not be funny to see scrotes seethe over the very clearly canon gay feelings between these two kekekek

No. 2302410

File: 1733862079089.jpeg (590.85 KB, 828x1147, IMG_0295.jpeg)

>>2301931
I don’t get it myself tbh, I just don’t see why a lesbian would prefer to see two fags kiss let alone fuck. It just sounds like they’re hiding how they find it hot.

No. 2302417

>>2301533
The thing is that women have been psyopped to get off to "being sexy" by itself and to not have the same standards for the men that are supposed to be attractive for them as well. This huge focus on "getting the other person off" while forgetting that the other party also has to do the same and that you're supposed to get off to their body is definitely not normal. Which is why smut for women that focuses more on the woman is fucked up and perpetuating the psyop. Besides, you're not the one getting the man off in the story (the protagonist is) so why would you insist on seeing her body so much if you're supposedly a straight woman and not self-inserting?

>>2301686
You're right, all shippers have the potential to be deranged and delusional, fujos shouldn't be singled out

No. 2302433

I read yuri from time to time despitebeing a yumefujo, i dont understand how a lesbian couldnt enjoy yaoi. Gay people can like straight ships too. Personally the reason why i read yuri sometimes its because its not as angsty and depressing as yaoi, so i can imagine a woman whos not into SOL school life uguu kawaii handholding with senpai might prefeer stories where the relationship actually goes places.

No. 2302449

>>2302118
Moids and fujos have a habit of making everything about them. Moids can't shut the fuck up about playing Infinity Nikki and bringing their degeneracy into the fandom and fujos can't play a game about and for women without somehow centering men.

No. 2302450

>>2297793
Which artist?

>>2297763
Otome audios with submissive or loving males also exist you know, and it's a way better medium than manga in terms of the moid being the focus. Which makes sense since the listener is completely unvoiced and the audio consists of the guy's voice only so he is forcefully the one who is sexualized. There's a lot of otome audios that consists of guys moaning.
I'm not a fujo because I'm not a big romance fan so most of the romance I consume is for self-insert purposes, but I can't stand female oriented garbage where the feMC is treated like a hentai character or yaoi uke, and yet still I don't like yaoi that much because I don't want to see two guys fuck unless in very specific scenarios. I don't care if I have to wait 100000 years for something decent to come out, I only read, look at, play and listen to yume and otome media that isn't trash. It exists but it's very scarce, and like I said audios are better and have more variety than manga, games and anime (in order of effort required to make them)

No. 2302451

>>2302449
nikki its a game for women, and most women are straight, thats why it has so many cute boys begging to be yumefujo bait, cope. Its not and will never be your yuri coom fantasy.

No. 2302454

>>2302433
I agree but it probably depends on how unappealing sex between a man and a woman, or two men, is to a lesbian, and also how much sex there is in the story. Lesbians are capable of enjoying love stories between het and gay male couples just as I'm able to enjoy lesbian love stories when I'm not looking to get off

No. 2302457

>>2302449
actual women writing something for themselves about fiction men is centering men, gotcha. are cgdct / haram shows with casts full of sexualized female characters centering women?

No. 2302463

>>2302451
>game centering women and made for women with majority female characters where a female is the main character
>omg why can't you let straight women write faggot porn?
>>2302457
>oh wow, look at this game that centers women. I sure can't wait to somehow make this about fucking a guy in the ass!

No. 2302464

>>2302463
You endlessly seethe to cope with your own inability to create what you want to see in fanwork.

No. 2302466

File: 1733863931195.webp (201.92 KB, 690x920, Evil_Oppressor.webp)

>>2302463
no one tell this tourist that nikki has tons of male outfits in the original game and that there are tons of male characters in all the nikki games

No. 2302470

>>2302463
>omg why can't you let straight women write faggot porn?
as if we need permission? get off your ass and write your own fics instead of whining and needling fujos

No. 2302474

>>2302463
Live Nikki even had bait between male characters, of course it had het romance and yuri bait too but I'm too pissed at the coomer incels and trannies playing infinity nikki taking advantage of that and using it to coom rn.

No. 2302475

>>2302457
>haram shows
kekkk
>>2302449
Stop your retarded anti-fujo crusade, in such a popular game's fandom there will be one or two people who write fanfic and since fujos are common and yaoi is popular, it's likely that at least one of those fics will be yaoi. You're also pretending that every single fujo that plays the game doesn't care about the female characters at all which is retarded, they're playing the game already, isn't that enough proof that they aren't exclusively interested in gay sex? Also this specific author is also a fan of Fruits Basket apparently

The fujos replying to you about your inability to create your own content are wrong, you don't want more stuff that appeals to you, you just want to infight because you need your daily dose of dopamine, and you don't speak for all of us non-fujos

No. 2302477

File: 1733864451528.jpg (1.43 MB, 1536x2048, Heavens_Hidden_Pathway_2.jpg)

>>2302474
Probably should have evidence posted too, funny enough looking this up apparently this won "best ship" in a 2022 official ship giveaway thing.

No. 2302485

File: 1733864831187.jpg (963.05 KB, 1300x1950, 0v5hOT.jpg)

>>2302477
nta but its gross moids and yuritroons are treating nikki like one of their coomer cgdct loli anime. I cant wait until they introduce male nikki clothes so these yurifags shut up. They really know nothing about the franchise and think women are weird incel yurifags like them that feel threatened by cute men. There is a reason why most anime/videogames that have an all female cast and arent meant for little girls are coomer goonfuel.

No. 2302495

>>2302220
I wasn't talking about the other anons in the reply chain though, I was specifically responding to the idea that people have to justify enjoying yaoi on the basis that the genre has uniquely good writing that you can't find anywhere else. But quality alone is not what draws people to certain genres, because all genres have their share of gems and crap. People enjoy genres on an aesthetic or thematic level, not necessarily based on merit.

No. 2302498

File: 1733865313167.jpg (137.55 KB, 703x1000, 91pm5-kYW+L._AC_UF1000,1000_QL…)

>>2302237
I know I already posted it, but Canis: Dear Hatter. There's also no anal sex in that title, since you're so hung up on that for whatever reason.

No. 2302504

>>2302485
A game that allows you to dress female avatars up like men and you're surprised it's "overrun" by troons?

No. 2302510

>>2302485
Also can't wait until the updates with male characters. They'll feel probably insecure for not relating to the actual women playing and make salty Reddit posts kek. Reminds me how troons cosplaying as fujos themselves focus more on being a stinky otaku girl rather than the yaoi itself

No. 2302511

>>2302504
Nah, nikki having male outfits filters fetishistic male troons. I wasnt talking about tifs and its weird you think i was.

No. 2302513

>>2302504
Shut up. Quit bringing your troon brainrot to Nikki. It's a fashion game, she wears all kinds of clothes. Wearing suits is not "troonshit".

No. 2302517

>>2302504
This comment is so trad kek

No. 2302520

>>2302475
Harem shows are haram tbh

No. 2302522

>>2302504
what do you have against gnc outfits? I love all the boystyle fits and I won't let no troons take that from me.
>>2302517
I swear lc is being overrun by tradcaths. Maybe that's why some of them hate yaoi so much. Can't have two men passionately kissing each other without rustling some jims.

No. 2302526

>>2302522
>>2302517
>>2302513
>>2302511
All I'm saying is that if a game clearly has gender non-conforming shit in it, it's going to attract a "certain demographic." That's just the truth.

No. 2302527

>>2302450
holy shit based

No. 2302530

>>2302526
its going to attract women(tifs) because its a game for women

No. 2302531

>>2302526
TIFs aren’t “gender non-conforming”

No. 2302534

>>2302504
The game was fine with a majority female audience for over a decade, sans a few reddit attention whores here and there.
It's only recently that it got this giant slap of new audience.

No. 2302535

>>2302526
If it keep tradshitters out, they should put boystyle outfits in every patch.

No. 2302536

>>2302485
Moids are so fucking used to cutesy girly media being made for their pedophile weeb coomer asses that they've forgotten that they're just coomer rip-offs of media for actual little girls, and that it was once considered embarrassing for them to be into shows for girls. We need to shame scrotes back into avoiding girly things because the only reason they latch onto those is too masturbate

No. 2302538

>>2302237
I like the webcomic Check Please! It's westshit, but it's a cutesy m/m romance written by a woman so it might as well be BL. It has some intelligent commentary on toxic masculinity in men's sports, but it's still a pretty lighthearted read. The male lead is very feminine, but not to fulfill an "uke" stereotype; rather, it's because he's meant to be a black sheep among all the macho frat guys, which provides a basis for the aformentioned commentary on masculinity. It also has a fun, fleshed-out supporting cast, which is unfortunately kind of rare in both straight and gay romance stories. If you can put up with the somewhat ugly Western art style, I'd recommend it.

No. 2302543

>>2302485
Why do they look like 8 year olds? Pedo.(yuripedo ban evading)

No. 2302545

>>2302485
I can't wait for the masculine outfits to drop tbh

>>2302538
Nta but you got even me interested in it.

No. 2302546

File: 1733866353011.gif (12.48 KB, 220x133, bait.gif)


No. 2302557

File: 1733866853432.jpg (1.18 MB, 1080x1080, High_Sword.jpg)

>>2302545
I kinda want to go full cultivation mode ngl

No. 2302685

>>2302543
Having a compsci degree and being so tech illiterate mods keep banning you for ban evasion is so fucking funny

No. 2302689

>>2302557
He’s so cute

No. 2302712

>>2302685
It's not even a matter of being tech illiterate. When you personalityfag that hard, farmhands can figure out who you are no matter how many VPNs and proxies and other bullshit you use. The only way to avoid being caught is stop stop being a retard, which clearly isn't going to happen in this case lel.

No. 2302753

>>2302685
Farmhands just gonna have to ban every Mexican IP kek.

No. 2303577

File: 1733905716648.jpg (49.16 KB, 640x480, ai-no-kusabi-riki-and-iason-sh…)

>>2302171
There is a dystopian futuristic yaoi full of lame BDSM scenes that I liked, it's called Ai no Kusabi.
I found its world compelling and an interesting dystopian sci-fi but the sex scenes were so fucking cringe kek. I watched it with friends when we got together to watch cringe anime… honestly Ai no Kusabi was on another level compared to everything else, though I wonder if the novels actually stand up as sci-fi stories.

The thing you don't know from the anime is that the highest class of men in this universe, the Blondies, are cyborgs that are made to be beautiful aryan ubermensch through surgeries. So the handsome blonde bishie bastard seme is the fucked up product of high-end techno surgery… I thought that was interesting. There is also a great deal of misogyny in its world so you understand why homosexuality is so widespread in it.
The uke also dies emasculated and it brings him great moid agony and at the end it's left ambiguous if he loved the seme at all (probably not). It was all surprisingly realistically written for genre standards… except the sex scenes which were just cringe.

No. 2303584

>>2303577
Ugh Ai so Kusabi is my guilty pleasure. I really like the art style.

No. 2303812

>>2302517
>>2302522
>swear lc is being overrun by tradcaths. Maybe that's why some of them hate yaoi so much.
Kek I thought LC fujos are ~not like other fujos~ because you're le based homophobic fag haters. Now you're caping for gay moids now? Cringe

No. 2303813

>>2302454
You can enjoy a love story but the main thing that makes ROMANCE as a genre appealing are the heart-flutters it gives you. That's why I don't get lesbian fujo's, especially those who read hentai doujins

No. 2303817

>>2303577
The art style is gorgeous especially for an 80s OVA, and the setting was really interesting but if anything it just made me realize how much buttfucking porn and fags disgust me. I guess some people can put up with that even if the story is good…

No. 2303916

>>2303813
>hentai doujins
…women read hentai doujins?

>>2303577
I read some of the ai no kusabi novels they are decent. Of course they do not get close to actual scifi literature for obvious reasons, but it's readable and enjoyable.

No. 2303918

>>2303892
uh yeah? anything with nudity? doesn't have to be ahegao but yeah. PORN DRAWING WITH MALE CHARCTERS

No. 2303925

>>2303918
damn, sorry to hear that kek

No. 2303937

>>2303892
uh yeah? anything with nudity? doesn't have to be ahegao but yeah. PORN DRAWING WITH MALE CHARCTERS

No. 2304024

>>2303812
I hate gay moids for being moids. You hate gay moids for being gay. We are not the same.

No. 2304064

>>2303812
In this case, it was women dressing gnc though?

No. 2304232

>>2298313
Yumejoshi specifically is about third party/POV/faceless self insertion. Literally none of the shit getting called yume in this thread is yume content.

No. 2304233

>>2302689
I don't play Love Nikki, but I'm pretty sure that's Nikki wearing a masculine outfit

No. 2304238

>>2304232
You're right, it's just het, but that still doesn't justify smut for straight women being all about the woman and getting off to her specifically

No. 2304242

>>2303812
It's not just fujos calling you out for being a retarded tradfag who can't tolerate women wearing GNC clothes and associating it with trannyshit

No. 2304246

>>2304238
True, I'm not defending that. Just saying Yumejoshi isn't just self insertion.

No. 2304250

>>2304246
Wait, Yumejoshi is self-insertion though, now I'm confused

No. 2304274

>>2304250
No, Yumejoshi is specifically about self-inserting as an OC, a generic faceless character or POV. It's literally just japanese Y/N x character. Self inserting as a canon character with a face, personality and story isn't yume, you're just a shipfag who self inserts into their ship but a lot of western yumes haven't looked at JP yume content to see what yume culture actually is before using the label and slapping it onto random shit.

No. 2304403

>>2304274
Yeah when I said yume is self-inserting I meant exactly the same thing as you, I wasn't including "imagining yourself as a canon character", I tend to disregard that as something in between

No. 2304515

>>2298143
so either the same level of shit is okay if its dudes, or youre putting effort into writing not shity male leads instead of female ones. Before the literacy-challenged anons jump me, I'm not expecting content to be made for me, I make my own. "Why do you care" Because youre the fan base equivalent of MCU slop and suck the life out of the room. Nothing was more lame than seeing fujos (often TIFs) crawl out of the woodwork in the BG3 fandom to bitch and complain about Astarion or Raphael having heavy FTav/Canon fanbases, croaking about how they didn't understand why the women want to fuck the angsty fagpire instead of having their boysona do it.
>>2297655
No, it isn't, yet multiple times fujos want to act like it's impossible for m/f to be like that. yes, m/m is subpar, just like m/f shit that feeds into the same tired sexist tropes is subpar. they cope that media is filled with het so we should be content with buttfucking in fandom spaces everytime a hot guy comes around as if women ever actually get hot or interesting guys in canon het shit anyways.

No. 2304580

>>2298162
the fact she says this while posting male drawn coom is so funny to me, she has to be trolling but also she was retarded enough to link her nickname to her real identity so i am sure shes just that way

No. 2304593

>>2304515
why not just ignore that people, the block button exists in twitter for a reason.

No. 2304859

>>2304403
If you are schizo enough this too can be yume.

No. 2305078

>>2304515
Here are your problems: 1) you don't take enough steps to minimize your exposure to Twitterbrained retards, and 2) you care too much about people enjoying something you hate. Look, we all encounter shit we hate in fandoms. I hate A/B/O, I hate "diverse" headcanons that make no sense, I hate certain ships, I hate BDSM, I hate moid coom art, etc. But here's the thing: my interaction with fandoms is solely through my friends and mutuals, so I see very little of the shit I hate, so when I do come across it, it's easy to shrug it off and move on. That's what you need to do. Find yourself some like-minded fans who don't post shit you hate, and center your fandom experience around them instead of wading through random garbage on Twitter. Get used to use the "exclude tags" feature on ao3. It doesn't matter whether you're a yume, a fujo, a hetshipper, or a hime: you will go insane if you don't properly curate your feed, mutuals, and searches. We all have to do it to varying degrees.

No. 2305157

>>2304859
Canon x canon will never be yume. That goes against the whole point of it.

No. 2305458

>>2304859
This, most don't give a shit about personalities anyway. It's "I want someone to win so I can feel like I'm winning."

No. 2305669

>>2305458
>most don't give a shit about personalities anyway. It's "I want someone to win so I can feel like I'm winning."
Again, this is only a thing in western yume spaces because most of you just picked up the term without bothering to find out what yume actually is. Yumejoshi only exist because people did care about that and wanted to self insert as themselves or an OC with their desired traits instead of a canon character and would write (Y/N) x character fanfics. It is a culture made specifically for women who don't want to self insert into canon x canon and that has never stopped being the case. In JP yume spaces, they will never bring up canon x canon even in the context of self inserting as a character, you will never see it in [fandom]プラス or yume tags and every JP site explaining the term says that being a yume is specifically about shipping your real life self or an OC with a character. I don't understand why western yumes can't accept this and shit up the term with unrelated shit, especially with calling otome games and smut manga yume.

No. 2306463

>>2305669
Representation has muddied the waters a bit, when canon is meant to be you, or when somebody headcanons a character to be their race, class, sex, personality, etc., then it's no longer really the canon character but an oc delusion that's pushed onto everybody else.
Of course, this is just talking about the extremely twitter cases.

No. 2306707

>>2306463
If it has the same name as the canon character, is treated like the canon character by the self inserter and everyone can tell it's just the canon character except with a race/sex/personalityswap then that's not an OC. That's just the canon character but botched. And with personality specifically, a lot of JP shipfags also do character collapse where they completely shit on the character's personality so they can project their own personality and desires onto a ship and none of them force that shit as yume or claim to be yume because of it since that's just a normal thing a lot of shipfags do, it's not something exclusive to western fanbases. The only real example of canon characters becoming OCs and yume would be like Pokemon and Fire Emblem where even though you're meant to self insert as the MC and they have no canon personality, self inserting as the default MC with the default name isn't yume and gets treated as normal shipping by JP fanbases while self inserting as a customized MC with a different name is seen as yume.

No. 2310698

File: 1734396659835.png (323.41 KB, 596x682, IMG_4041.png)




Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]