[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password (For post deletion)

Apply as Administrator


File: 1602139688474.jpg (4.39 KB, 225x225, index.jpg)

No. 649527

previous thread: >>529582

feel free to air your grievances about twitter (twat + shitter)

No. 649530

File: 1602140207955.png (251.1 KB, 599x470, andy-richter.PNG)

>>649527
lowkey twitter is good for exposing celebrities who probably have women locked in their basement and 10TB of cp on their computer. one look at andy richter's twitter or patton oswalt's twitter and you can tell they're hiding something

No. 649532

>>649530

Where is that meme which says "Pedophiles are using this symbol to signal each other and disguise themselves from the others" or something similar and the symbol is the Twitter blue checkmark? Google doesn't help at all

No. 649534

File: 1602140896218.jpg (127.58 KB, 720x626, 463.jpg)

>>649532

Nvm found it, why is it so funny

No. 649536

>>649530
Take your pills

No. 649760

File: 1602166125500.png (44.81 KB, 300x279, NO.png)

what makes kpoppies like this

No. 649775

>>649760
What? He’s a cat boy with a vagina? I wish someone could translate that and send it to him.

No. 649782

File: 1602167554617.jpg (35.85 KB, 320x319, 60abb68a7b68462feeb9d162730614…)

>>649760

Why so many hybrid Jimin fanfiction? Why Jimin? Why hybrids?

No. 649786

File: 1602167707320.jpeg (27.62 KB, 500x396, images (22).jpeg)


No. 649787

>>649775
I can't imagine how surreal it must be to see these things written about yourself
But this made me wonder, are korean kpop fans like this too? like do they write porn about them? do they know about the existence of abo and catboys?

No. 649789

>>649787
>do they write porn about them? do they know about the existence of abo and catboys?
you don't want to know

No. 649790

>>649782
>>649786
I hate this. I dont get it. Why Jimin. Why is it always bts fans.. this is some level of insanity i never want to reach.

No. 649791

File: 1602167986559.jpg (48.94 KB, 479x629, 1827as8eh299182ae97a9e.jpg)


No. 649792

I really want the k-pop thread back, I'm not that much into the music, I just want to point and laugh at the fandom retardation without having to spam other threads

No. 649793

>>649760
It's honestly just insane ass tumblr people, (probably underaged too.) I'm all for expressing yourself through writing, but this shit is some next level disturbing. I dont get it

No. 649795

>>649792
I miss the kpop thread for the laughs and lurking. I just want a containment thread to see what the fuck is happening now a days. I think containment threads are good for that reason.

No. 649800

>>649786
>>649782
Why is Jimin always the ultimate bottom who gets abused? Do people hate Jimin that much? Or is he so boring that people use him as self-insert? Why is he always some random animal hybrid? I’m so, so confused, I’ve never payed too much attention to the k-pop hell and now I can see that it is a different type of hell than what I expected.

No. 649804

>>649800

>or is he so boring that people use him as self-insert


I think that one's the most likely explanation, exacerbated by the fact that he's the shortest and "girliest" looking

No. 649810

>>649795
The kpop threads on cc are so fucking chaotic, more so than the threads that were on lc. Some anon cursing and hexing other anons for thinking her oppa was ugly.

No. 649821

File: 1602169644100.jpg (61.76 KB, 392x381, mento ilness.jpg)

>>649810

Imagine unironically believing in magic AND being a K-pop stan. Like, pick a struggle

No. 649826

File: 1602169854933.png (16.2 KB, 745x190, srs bsns.png)

Anyway

No. 649834

>>649826
Who has this much time to even ponder about shit like this? Or even thinking their take is of any significance.

No. 649840

File: 1602170365307.jpeg (270.99 KB, 1125x497, B137C6D0-7C6B-4955-9AE5-47140C…)

>>649826
sooo pronouns don’t matter in terms of gendering or classifying someone as one thing or another. if only the trannies could come out and say their she/her pronouns are there to denote that they simply draw inspiration from women

No. 649847

>>649840

I just noticed the k-pop pfp, i'm dying

why does it always come back to k-pop

No. 650103

File: 1602179735521.jpg (91.56 KB, 564x564, 4d9796b4eb0843e928b750412670f3…)


No. 650104

File: 1602179790470.jpg (28.72 KB, 256x256, download (40).jpg)

>>649826
in other words this bitch was born in america

No. 650158

File: 1602181583080.jpeg (317.36 KB, 750x748, 62A7A61C-2056-4C20-B5EB-3FD079…)

>nya / nyas
>catgender
I hope this isn't an adult…

No. 650163

>>650158
this person probably isn’t even old enough to remember 2009

No. 650173

>>650163
nvm that's definitely like an 11 year old
are kids this young even allowed on twitter

No. 650177

>>650158
>>650173
How is this actual child into a dead webcomic from 2009

No. 650178

>>650173
> 2009 vibes
you were 4 in 2009…

No. 650181

>>650177
I worry for kids raised on the internet

No. 650219

>>649840
>if only the trannies could come out and say their she/her pronouns are there to denote that they simply draw inspiration from women
This is actually gold. Thank you, anon.
>"You're not a woman, you're woman-inspired"

No. 650224

>>650158
Probably born in 2009

>>650173
No, the minimum age is 13. But I know that didn't stop me from signing up to 13/16/18+ websites when I was 10 so it's definitely not going to stop kids now.

>>649840
>>650219
Trannies are woman-inspired, that's perfect, gonna use that from now on

No. 650226

File: 1602183292941.gif (1.4 MB, 500x275, 2a867141c8a9e9659d51e16e8921b4…)

>>650173
>kids talking about your high school graduation year like it's ancient history

No. 650254

>>650103
this is the worst image i've ever seen, thank you. suicide material

>>650173
someone please get this fucking kid off twitter they look like they're 10, i can't even tell what gender they are because this kid hasn't even started developing a smidge of secondary sex characteristics. what the hell?

No. 650280

>>649826
Why do pigshit thick Americans think that they are connected to places they’ve never lived because their descendents of people who were?

No. 650285

File: 1602185623660.jpeg (333.58 KB, 567x1029, AB78A7F0-9DDC-4C57-8B54-F63239…)

>>650158
>catgender

Many such cases….

No. 650287

>>649840
This reminds me of witch twitter having a shitfit over "omg these edgy nu witches cursed the moon! And Apollo is mad you hurt his sister!"
It's always Hellenis. Always

No. 650288

>>650285

>they make me feel so nice


imagine being so self-absorbed you completely miss the point of third person pronouns, it's not for your personal validation, but to make it easier for people to refer to you

No. 650291

>>649534
Holy shit I snorted at this hard

>>649810
Each day I'm happier that admin decided to nuke the k-pop threads here

No. 650313

>>650288
It's the narcissism.
In all seriousness, how do these people think neopronouns would work in non-english languages? The most retarded take I've seen so far from someone on tumblr with cat neopronouns is that people in China should "draw" a cat when referring to her. Again, it's the narcissism. No concern for anyone else but themselves.

No. 650359

>>650313
key this is hilarious. My language is not gendered at all, which probably pisses gender retards off so much

No. 650362

>>650313
Neopronouns are utterly retarded, you just made me wonder how it would be like in a language like Spanish or French
>Miau me dijo que miau mamá miau pega
>Miau y Fae se van a casar la semana que viene
>Miaou était très contemiaou
>Quand miaou est ennuyemiaou miaou est tristmiaou
They would probably die mad dealing with actually gendered languages.

No. 650364

File: 1602188920086.png (29.54 KB, 742x151, image_2020-10-08_163004.png)

gen z is so based ! yaaas kween !!!!!111

No. 650365

>>650364
>synonym for bimbo
What?

No. 650368

>>650364
Imagine preferring being called a bimbo than being called a radfem.

No. 650376

>>650368
best part is this is probably a minor brainwashed by the trans cult into thinking saying shit like this is normal and not a warning sign

No. 650384

>>650364
>synonym for bimbo
next level retardation

No. 650392

>>650364
why would there being another insult for women be 'cool'?

No. 650402

File: 1602190148837.png (16.77 KB, 1167x515, dr phil ranch asap.png)

>>650364
>synonym for bimbo
>obsessed with shipping zim characters
>16
>D0UBL3Z DNI in bio
>pic related
Twitter actually causes brainrot

No. 650408

>>650402
Notice how she literally uses she/her… Wtf is the point anymore . "zimz" why the fuck did tumblr immigrate to twitter ffs.

No. 650409

>>650408
>why the fuck did tumblr immigrate to twitter ffs
Porn ban

No. 650416

File: 1602190804330.png (114.68 KB, 740x419, image_2020-10-08_170007.png)

>>650409
twitter is great because its a cesspool of the internet so other social media can finally start to mellow out. eventually tiktok will be fully migrated there, i'm sure jack had this in mind.
also i love the trigger warnings kpop fans use. idk why they said tw rape…

No. 650431

>>650402
>cup/cake/cupcakes/cupcakeself
When you're bake sale kin

No. 650465

File: 1602195226799.png (95.23 KB, 590x832, twittertrash.PNG)

Every tweet in this thread except the op one got progressively more awful

No. 650468

>>650465
>Hipersexual
>Asexual

Pick one

No. 650478

>>650468
These are not mutually exclusive, hypersexuality is caused by trauma or hormone imbalances, it has nothing to do with sexuality or attraction.

No. 650479

>>650478
You lost me the moment you implied asexuality was real

No. 650482

>>650479
Idk i can’t find a better label for myself when i have no interest in sex or masturbation.

No. 650485

>>650478
So are you telling me that an Asexual, a person who feels no sexual attraction to anyone and has a low libido, Can also be hypersexual? Which is someone addicted to sex? How? Enlighten me.

No. 650489

>>650485
Yeah, it will be a form of self harm derived from trauma?
Having sex when you don’t want to for validation or addiction is self harm.

No. 650492

>>650489
Which means selling nudes on Onlyfans and receiving sexual messages is not a coping mechanism, just a way to torture oneself.

No. 650496

>>650492
Yeah that was the whole point of the screenshot being posted?
I didn’t disagree with that, just that the other anon said that an asexual person can’t be hypersexual, since hypersexuality is a health issue not a sexuality.

No. 650513

>>650496
First anon here.

Thank you for explaining this, I was sceptical about this because I often see people that go insane after being asked like >>650485 did, it feels dishonest to me when people go full defensive after one question and I never got an answer, so thank you for answering!

No. 650521

>>650513
No problem! I feel like people get very defensive because its hard to admit that hypersexuality is damaging as it really is, specially if someone could be considered asexual, it ironically seems to be a taboo subject in sex posi spaces lol

Its very saddening to see self harm like that being normalized behind a yass queen werk!! façade, hypersexuality is very emotionally damaging, ruins relationships and messes up your relationship with your body, it should be treated not praised.

No. 650591

>>650465
One thing I’ve noticed is that troons, self hating sex workers, idiots in general all say that it took [their age] years to figure themselves out

No. 650684

>>650482
it's called being a normal person and probably stressed/depressed

No. 650699

>>650158
>>650173
>>650177
I was just gonna say that.. I cant believe in 2020 people are still into Homestuck

No. 651804

File: 1602308093855.jpeg (263.16 KB, 1611x695, 7EAAB3B1-16B3-4703-B60E-998E7F…)


No. 651807

>>651804
but I /am/ poor communities, that's why I'm shopping at Goodwill and trying to hock used Abercrombie on ebay

No. 651809

>>651804
I mean its true, in alot of bigger cities like LA and San Fran poor people can’t thrift shop anymore because the shops have raised their prices thru the roof due to it being trendy and cool.

No. 651811

>>651809
oh that's fucked up, nvm
haha, flyovers for once

No. 651813

>>651804
Based and true

No. 651818

>>649826
>>650409
Im really happy to see them being tumblrized because while it may wreak havoc on some naive souls , hopefully it will make a bigger amount fucking quit shitter

No. 651866

>>651804
(Rant because this shit is annoying to me)
That buzzword tho. Gentrifying by buying clothes (practically infinite inventory that is given to the store for free) at the set price and blaming the people who need that little extra income instead of shops who jack up prices on the trendy brands because they want more money. Do people not understand that most clothes donated are sent to landfills and clothes aren’t unattainable? I don’t see an issue with more people cycling through the used clothing that’s already produced instead of buying new shit.
Sourcing decent clothing and listing it for sale is also a huge time sink and every place I’ve gone to it’s practically impossible to find anything worth the time to examine and research. It’s not like actual wealthy people or people with full time jobs are camping out at the bins and thrift shops to dig through stained torn up fast fashion to snatch up all the fancier shit and leave rags for the rest of us. It’s so easy to get good deals on those reselling platforms also because people are desperate to declutter so again there’s no shortage of ways to get clothing. I don’t see a problem that someone might happen to sell something to a willing buyer for a mutual benefit.

No. 651874

>>651866
>It’s not like actual wealthy people or people with full time jobs are camping out at the bins and thrift shops to dig through stained torn up fast fashion to snatch up all the fancier shit and leave rags for the rest of us.
This. Bitter poorfags who really think well off people are there hogging all the quality stuff instead of, you know, buying it new with the money they have. The only hockers I've known have always been low income people who are doing it because they need the extra money so bad they're willing to go through that extra hassle.

No. 651901

I think the constant e-begging I see on Twitter might be the thing that makes me drop it. It started during BLM protests where people were (rightfully and kindly) donating to bail funds and funeral drives… it's like troons got a whiff of the monies in the air and decided that them and their mothers all suddenly needed gofuckme's for their gender reassignment surgeries. Can't go a day without seeing a paypal link on my TL.

No. 651940

File: 1602329868523.png (544.72 KB, 1424x1228, 1602065800254.png)

Troons: "did you just assume my gender?" jokes are not funny and literally no trans person actually acts like that!!

Also troons:

No. 652062

File: 1602343344707.png (34.22 KB, 596x262, twitterthrifting.PNG)

>>651804
I don't find stuff like this that bad, because of what >>651809 said, but I find the whole "don't buy oversized clothes while thrifting cause you are stealing from fatties!!" thing that always comes up in twitter thrifting discourse insufferable. I wish I could find this chick's tweet where she said she wanted to walk up to a thin girl at her thrift store and smack and oversized sweater out of her hand, but this is another example.

No. 652068

>>652062
>>651804
>>651809
thrift stores in my old city were being paid off to raise prices by fast fashion shops like f21. there was a huge scandal about it.

No. 652069

>>650496
>hypersexuality is a health issue not a sexuality
Agree, but a lack of sexual interest isn't a sexuality either, especially when considering your own logic.

No. 652072

>>650104
this reply made me kek, truly the longest way to say "I'm an American".

>>651809
This has been the case where I live as well. Most of the time it's much cheaper or equally priced to get fast fashion crap than to thrift. Like buying a worn out, second-hand non-brand blouse might go for 10 euros while you could get a new one from H&M for the same price. Thrifting used to be an efficient way to save money back when clothes weren't polyester crap produced with slave labor in Bangladesh. Sometimes you might find nice shoes for cheap but never in your own size.

No. 652077

>>652069
How so? Lack of sexual attraction does not have negative impacts in someone’s mental and physical health, and sexuality is basically defined by WHO you want to fuck, someone wants no fuck no one therfore asexual.
Im going to strawman myself here but Im not depressed, don’t have any traumas and im fairly healthy, not a virgin or a teenager either, I still have no interest in sex and don’t enjoy it or masturbation at all, I can’t call myself straight or lesbian or bisexual because im not interested in men or women sexually at all, im not interested in anyone.

No. 652113

>>652077
Nayrt but as an asexual do you actually care about asexuality being included in the pride flag and lgbt+ ?
For what it's worth I agree with you about asexuality being valid as there have always been people who are genuinely happy living asexually, however there will also be many people who are actually just suffering low libido for whatever medical or psychological who may latch onto the label because it feels better than trying to find out how they are "broken". And then you get the demisexual aromantics.
Imo I don't have a problem with asexuality, but I can see why others argue over it.

No. 652133

>>652113
Agreed. If someone feels no sexual attractions or desires and is content with it, I'm happy for them, but I'm concerned about the number of farmers I've seen who genuinely think that routine sexual stimulation isn't important to one's physical and mental health. It's been proven to be beneficial for the physical functions of both sexes.

No. 652156

>>652151
But I kinda don’t? I don’t care for the sex of the person I have relationship with because im not interested in having sex at all, ive had female partners as well.
>>652113
Those are all very valid points, I also see alot of autistic people identifying as asexual when they probably just have sensory issues due to their autism.
Its a hard subject because people get veeery defensive when it comes to stuff like trauma or being told they have a health issue, and also because other asexuals don’t want to be the asshole gatekeeper lol, I completely understand how it can come off as a fake sexuality.

As for the LGBT flag and pride in general, look no one is getting kicked out of their family home for not wanting sex, or beat up on the street, sexual assault does happen rarely when you say “I don’t like sex EVER” but its more of an issue of being around people who don’t respect you in general, it feels nice to go to pride and shit and asexuality should be talked about for clarity and awareness sake but it doesn’t have to be as important as other LGBT topics.

>>652133
Cue in my gynecologist saying I should at least do pelvic floor excercises and use those balls because muscle atrophy is a real fucking thing and very dangerous.

No. 652164

>>652077
Because it's quite literally the opposite of hypersexuality, which you explained is not a sexuality. I'm not saying you're mentally ill, I'm saying from my perspective you conform to gender preferences (traditional sexuality) without the libido. How is it a sexuality in itself and not just a descriptor?

>>652113
I'm definitely not trying to argue of invalidate anyone. I just think you don't need to identify with perceivably trivial labels to be a complete and worthy human being. I'm cool with asexuals but I agree with your point some are probably struggling. What I meant predominantly by that post was I disagree with missguided assumption it's a unique sexuality or a necessary label.

>>652133
That's definitely a concern, one that goes both ways. There's a middle ground which I think most people need to feel balanced mentally. Seen plenty of coomer anons here who care way too much about other people devoting their existence to things other than cooming too.

Repost because it's 5am and I didn't read shit properly soz

No. 652167

>>652156
Soz for samfag but I'm not claiming being straight is the only traditional sexuality. The first 3 letters of LGBTQ-whatever the fuck it is now have been applied since time immemorial.

If it makes you happy calling yourself that, I unironically hope it brings you joy. I just have a different opinion on the legitimacy of it being a sexuality.

No. 652211

File: 1602355341716.jpg (23.3 KB, 750x120, tumblr_a4ffbb1463ff005cd3bc57f…)


No. 652250

I just hate how it seems normalized and almost like it's required to be "sassy", "sarcastic" or, what it really is most of the time, to be constantly out for confrontation, condescending and over the top rude as soon as people join the platform. It seems like twitter's culture at this point. I get being a bitch on imageboards just because you can and because it's contained exclusively there, but twitter is almost like a social media, people attach their identities with it and get personal. It's like those early 00s boomers psa's (when internet-addiction was still something that was warned of) where people forget that there are also people on the other side of the screen.

No. 652276

>>650364
I think their interpretation is radically feminine = bimbo(you know, because that's what being feminine is about), which is even worse.

No. 652303

>>649527
Does the OP image look like Sonic the hedgehog or is it just me

No. 652308

File: 1602363861051.png (59.27 KB, 591x564, coomerade.PNG)

Ah yes, the real priority America should have in 2020

No. 652320

>>652308
Ok, so porn that the proletariat decided was appropriate to create and distribute. This is so nonsensical.

No. 652448

>>652308
I'm so tired with (some) americans obsession with communism. Yeah it's cool in theory but I beg you, look at ANY country that tried.

No. 652455

>>652448
As someone who lives next to Russia I agree. The people who support straight out communism are usually leeches anyway, they think that once glorious communism gets implemented they get to laze around with everything coming to them with absolutely no effort. When in reality they would be assigned a shitty position and forced to work there each day to contribute to society while earning no money but instead calculated rations with only the essentials handed out. Their hedonistic asses would be even more miserable.

No. 652471

>>652455
A lot of people out here simping for communism are more likely than not middle class and have been treated fairly when asking for government assistance because they are seen as "useful" members of society. It's only when you are in poverty and lower class, the government does the bare minimum in helping you and asking for assistance requires more steps and limitations correlating to your wealth, basically if you start getting back on your feet, they will initiate a cycle that will bring you back down to poverty.

No. 652543

>>652471
THIS. Communism is shit, and everyone who supports it has clearly never worked a shit job for meager pay and been told to be grateful for it while your efforts and profits go to someone else. That's literally communism, your work makes money for everyone else, who is just as bad off as you.

No system exists in this world where the working class have as much as the ruling class, and that's by design. The closest you coild ever hope to get to functioning communism/socialism is if taxes were used for their intended purpose.

No. 652764

>>652308
>sex work will work under communism and absolutely will not be exploited trust me guys
>bluh bluh bluh i don't have any arguments sub to my onlyfans xoxo
so what? is the state going to have to pay for trannies to show off their cone tits and atrophied penises? kek
>>652448
>m-muh CIA sabotage of course it didn't work!! the USA sabotaged everything!! it's just propaganda!!
As a third worlder I just don't listen to any first worlders talking about communism. This apparently triggers any commie I talk to because they immediately start talking about how Brazil and South America were sabotaged by the USA, and I'm just like, sorry your mommy and daddy didn't renew your discord nitro subscription. What the hell?

No. 652855

Twitter Stans is a mistake. Kpop , hollywood Actor/Actress,western Musician, you name it.
I just want twitter collect these account and transfer it another server or something.

No. 652864

>>652855

blue checkmarks are still worse tho. at least stans can be entertaining in their own retarded way

No. 652902

>>652764
>sorry your mommy and daddy didn't renew your discord nitro subscription
Based, anon

No. 652918

>>652211
This is so funny oh my god

No. 652922


No. 653006

File: 1602451451928.jpg (121.65 KB, 946x2048, audacity.jpg)

She literally just posted a photo of herself and this 2/10 scrote just rates her. Also, there're a bunch of pickmes and scrotes in the comments talking about how he's entitled to have his opinion

No. 653009


No. 653039

File: 1602454536377.jpg (92.79 KB, 719x295, Screenshot_20201011-231537_Chr…)

>>653006
And there we have it.

No. 653041

>>653039
Ah yes, let me insult you but then i will tell you that you’re totally pretty because of how insecure I am, I won’t say I’m sorry though.
It’s basically the “I’m sorry I offended you” type of tactic.

No. 653042

>>653039
Isn't there an entire practice dedicated to that with PUA?

No. 653043

>>650158
The scenecore community had discourse recently about nya / nyaself pronouns being offensive / appropriation of Japanese people. I love seeing these dipshits eat each other alive

No. 653060

>>653006
I think shes very beautiful. She has a unique but still pretty face unlike whatever shooped wig-wearing e-thot the scrotes jack their necrotic dick to these days

No. 653069

File: 1602458612859.png (47.99 KB, 590x462, showmewhereiasked.png)

>>653006
These comments are legit so enraging, holy shit. This girl's selfie is so "revealing" (it's a photo of her face) so she's clearly begging for slimy men to objectify her? Nani the fuck.

It's absolutely depressing how many people actually think like this. This pickme has a photo of herself up too, does that mean I'm welcome to objectify her as well? What an abhorrent fucking attitude.

No. 653151

File: 1602464940040.png (89.15 KB, 583x406, 0.PNG)


No. 653194

File: 1602468325335.jpeg (336.18 KB, 738x720, 44F10597-2775-40FC-9EC0-B9D9DE…)

>>653009
when incels try and get "intellectual", and some just post shitty scrote memes

No. 653228

>>653006
>>653194
Saw this tweet and the backlash on my tl this afternoon, feel so bad for this girl who just wanted to post a couple selfies

No. 653265

>>653194
They're so fucking dense and stupid. It's incredible how when the scrote rates her because he's feeling brave, he's "entitled to his opinion", she does the same and doesn't receive the same treatment what the fuck. I can already predict these scrotes making it a trend to rate random girl's pictures and all the pickmes defending them

No. 653281

>>653006
I hate the pickmes for defending a scrote that’s unnecessary in the genetic pool, he’s an absolute nobody and those retards will defend him for what? A crumb of phimotic dick? Asspats from other pickmes and scrotes?
Those fucking idiots need to know that neither Ryan, Brad, Phil nor Arthur or whoever’s dick they want to ride, will never pay attention to them just because they defended a fucking nobody asshat on Twitter.

No. 653295

File: 1602480203005.png (24.33 KB, 1416x1056, 6842d95cdc36b36d12e6a260c84b9f…)

Kill twitter. Kill twitter forever. Anyone else notice how the op image looks like Sanic. Yes very fitting of the pure autism twitter has inflicted upon greater society. If I had a time machine I would go back in a time and brutally murder tumblr before the cancer that is twitter could emerge from its cloaca.

No. 653323

>>653295
Twitter is a psyop devised by Chris-Chan to make everyone as retarded as him… and it's working.

No. 653326

>>653323
I love you lmao.

No. 653336

>>653326
Love you too bitch

No. 653389

>>653194
God, my hatred for men grows everyday.

No. 653404

>>653006
God imagine posting an innocuous picture of yourself and someone insults you for literally no reason, causing a giant shitstorm. Twitter is like the worst things about Tumblr combined with the worst things about Reddit.

No. 656314

File: 1602765570153.png (813.57 KB, 588x1549, seraphine.png)

This whole Seraphine thing really is kinda weird. I don't mind social media managers joking between each other using brand accounts because having worked in marketing enviromnent I know it's usually real, genuine fun for everyone involved but things like this or for example, SunnyD's tweet "I can't do that anymore" from the past are kinda crossing the line of what - at least as for now - should be considered normal.

No. 656315

>>656314
samefag, forgot to explain the context:
Seraphine is a new character from League of Legends game and this account is an official account used to roleplay as she's a real person to promote the game/character

No. 656320

>>656314
I find it unsettling and a bit immoral tbh, how they are trying to get players attached to her by getting her to act like a real influencer who might speak to them or retweet their art, just to sell some skins.
I get that it's just marketing but it's kind of evil to take advantage of lonely people who take crumbs of "human" interaction through twitter, twitch or whatever.

No. 656339

>>656314
Wow, now that’s just creepy. What the fuck, it’s like those weird ass kinnie larps but people are taking it seriously.

No. 656367

>>656314
Looking through the way her twitter is managed if not for pictures of a 3d model of the character it would never occur to me it's not a real person with a real life. Unsettling.

No. 656390

>>656314
All the work for that champ, she has a ig a Twitter etc and she is only a Sona 2.0 sad.

No. 656437

>>656320
I don't feel bad for people pathetic enough to fall for fake influencer marketing

No. 656640

>>656314
They fucked over my main and copied her for this? I'm putting riot in a dumpster.

No. 656798

>>651940

i know this is old but had this shit on among us today, someone asked another player if they were lesbian because they were called something like "redgirl" and then said "i'm nonbinary". she got killed in the first round kek

No. 657233

File: 1602861061039.jpg (25.49 KB, 828x427, twitter.jpg)

I'm surprised this has not been posted yet, but minor tinfoil. twitter has such a massive pedo problem because they enable it which is why they tweet shit like this.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Twitter/status/1113510043989762049

No. 657255

>>657233
but you can see the tweet they were responding too right below it?

No. 657261

>>657233
ugh, atleast other websites have the decency PRETEND they care about the CP on their platform. when megalinks was at it's peak i went through the tag and mass reported everything i found (crying as i did so), got twitter replying about 48 hours later saying "thank you for reporting, we found this account did violate our community guidelines. thank you for keeping twitter safe!" but when i checked again the posts and accounts were still up so…. what did they do about it? nothing. just sent some stupid automated message to sedate me. yet when i report bots for nudity and spam they get taken down in hours.
absolutely disgusting.

No. 657264

samefag and this is completely uninteresting to anyone other than me but i deleted twitter last night because a new episode of a show i like came out and i do not want spoilers and yet im still getting twitter notifications!! aaghhhhhhhhhh.

No. 657276

>>657264
Go to your settings and turn notifs off!

No. 657282

>>657261
Sometimes I wonder if it’s some kind of FBI sting. Like we know they keep certain cp sites up and running so they can catch these disgusting freaks or so the story goes

No. 657288

File: 1602863229160.jpg (123.51 KB, 1666x905, Ej_9oEMXYAQCgZA.jpg)

>>657255
OP won't deliver but I will, obviously it was completely innocent

No. 657302

File: 1602863983879.png (180.01 KB, 400x574, D3BEC059-DDBA-4E8E-845E-C684A6…)

Twitter discovers dark ambient music

No. 657305

File: 1602864016240.png (50.2 KB, 400x185, 6B635BBF-792A-4863-8764-E6780F…)

>>657302
here’s more

No. 657309

>>657305
HOLY SHIT 'trauma'? This is why I don't take it seriously when someone online says they have gone through traumatic experiences, this is the shit they consider traumatic.

No. 657320

>>657305
histrionic personality disorder

No. 657325

>>657305
>>657302
Hahaha I am getting secondhand trauma. What's the account @ please.

No. 657328

File: 1602865498592.png (20.37 KB, 590x162, Przechwytywanie.PNG)

>>657325
I couldn't find the comment so I thought it's trolling, but i've finally found it was posted by a twitter user @TessasTeaTime who seems to have deleted their account, but if you search for that name you'll see responses of people who interacted with that tweet and were VERY serious about it…. unless people are just larping, i dont know anything anymore

No. 657330

File: 1602865874777.png (15.46 KB, 594x128, huh.PNG)

not to be mean to some twitter rando but IMAGINE going to your parents and saying "Mom… dad… i'm PLURAL"
hysterical

No. 657331

>>657305
that's copypasta

No. 657333

>>657305
TessasTeaTime
it's private

No. 657336

>>657333
I'm familiar with that faggot, isnt that a crazed "plural" with a thousand alters? I'm surprised she went private

No. 657345

>>657305
I mean, that musical piece is pretty hard hitting but I wouldn't say traumatic. Maybe they just didn't have the words to describe what they felt and trauma was the closest? Bad choice of words still.

No. 657418

>>653042
You're talking about negging?

No. 658574

>>650103
I don't get this image, its bringing out emotions in me I can't understand, like is this left wing cringe or right wing cringe

No. 658575

>>658574
Left wing

No. 658584

>>652448
>>652455
>>652764
sage for super off topic but I live in a Islamic republic where the words of a 8th century Arab fantasy book is above everything else, I would much rather live in a communist shit hole then a Islamic shithole
I would rather the Entire Muslim world have embraced state communism or socialism but yanks had to ruin it by funding Islamists,
I mean fuck you supported a coup against our democratically elected socialist president and placed a Islamist dictator who brought such things as stonings and public whippings to Pakistan and my country stiff suffers from the after effects of a decade Islamists policy that were never changed

No. 658626

>>658584
Based anon. I'm no fan of commies, but the US needs to gtfo of international affairs (like that will ever happen though).

No. 658659

>>658626
State level Islam is cancer no matter how liberal it gets, we needed a communist state that utterly destroyed the faith

No. 658689

File: 1603039484853.jpg (103.72 KB, 830x553, download.jpg)

>>658659
He tried to make it happen with the Non-Aligned Movement and then his whole country got ransacked after he died.

>tfw we should've listened

No. 658741

>>657233
Related but
>tweets and accounts making fun of troons gets deleted immediately
>pedo shit gets to stay up

I’ll never forget running into an account that sold child sex dolls. I hate it here

No. 658752

File: 1603045734488.png (30.84 KB, 600x360, gggddd.PNG)

my retarded ass posted this in the old thread yesterday, anyway it's amazing how much woke culture benefits men, how dare women date who they want.
Tweets about what women are or are not doing with their bodies always get a lot of attention on twitter. Funny how when it's the opposite (telling men they are weird for not wanting transwomen or even telling men they "fatphobic" for no wanting fat girls) the comments are ALWAYS full of men telling the OP to fuck off.
These comments however are a circle jerk of rainbow flags, troons and even the odd straight men/lesbian, ALL complaining that women aren't dating/fucking how they want them too.
Crazy how men don't want to be dick watched by women, transwomen and trans men, but sure LOVE to clit watch, even the ones who don't even like women come in trying to talk shit.

No. 658757

>>658752
Wouldn't fathom the thought of talking to a man that's slept with or is attracted to men outside of friendship.

No. 658766

File: 1603047115541.jpeg (377.16 KB, 1242x1763, FCBB49B6-BAD9-4B4E-8CF1-072DC0…)

This person is obnoxious as fuck but wasn’t the cannibal artist kidding?

>>658752
Is she not aware that a lot of bi men are either nutjobs, degenerates or both? Gay men don’t even like them KEK but anything to seem woke I guess

No. 658770

>>658752
Women need to stop being door mats and letting retards like this gaslight them into dating people they don’t want to.

No. 658780


No. 658784

>>658766
The ethical cannibal artist was not joking lmao. I feel like it was just a coverup. They made so many tweets about eating people

No. 658810

>>658784
I wonder if that's the mf that was posting here. The cannibal anon.

No. 658815

>>658766
Good point, but gay men are MEN they are allowed to have preferences. Rather it's wanting magical straight men who fuck men, not wanting bisexual men or not wanting troons. I've seen men understand why gay men wouldn't want trans men more than they did Lesbians not wanting transwomen.
Not to mention troons get out of fucking eachother by saying,"It triggers my BD", yet fucking a woman with a vagina doesn't.

Everyone male is able to have a preference and it not seen as problematic.

No. 658817

>>658752
Twitter / woke culture in general hates women if they’re not doing something to benefit or appeal to men

Want to get your tiddies out online? Sure go ahead!
Want a discussion about how sanitary products should be provided free to the poorest in society, just like condoms? Go fuck yourself you terf, condoms are only free because millions of gay men died during the AIDS crisis, it’s incomparable!!!1!

No. 658838

>>658815
>wanting magical straight men who fuck men
I’ll never understand this fetish. What is it with them and straight men?

No. 658931

>>658838
Maybe it has something to do with feeling "special"? Like they can attract a straight man and he "changes" for them

No. 658940

>>658838
>>658931
>Maybe it has something to do with feeling "special"?
Its exactly this. Its the exact same reason men are obsessed with fucking/converting lesbians.

No. 660116

File: 1603603486523.jpeg (196.46 KB, 750x882, 7BCA80B5-0B1D-45E1-B1AE-0F6806…)


No. 660117

>>658752
>telling the OP to fuck off
Which is all every girl should do with insane scrotes like this kek

No. 660118

>>660116
Lol this is kinda cute ngl I'm not even mad.

No. 660119

>>660116
I hope it’s a joke.

No. 660120

>>660116
What the fuck is a xenogender?

Anyway, cute moomin.

No. 660121

>>660120
Any adult worshipping moomin in 2020 are legit autists

No. 660151

Virgin Twitter artist that immediately backtracks when people call them out for just thinking about buying bones vs. Chad Tumblr Witch who goes on the defense and calls people racist for saying they shouldn’t steal bones.

Twitter does Tumblr drama 4 years late and yet somehow manages to make it extremely boring.

No. 660166

File: 1603684180754.png (443.92 KB, 665x1104, shit discourse.png)

How does lolcow feel about americucks just finding out about the word gringo (lit. american/foreigner. can also mean white foreigner) because of Hetalia, and then immediately rushing to call it a slur, trampling and imposing their meaning of a word into another culture? Also I don't care about that faggot anime but I do have to mention this hashtag did spawn from Hetalia being revived.

No. 660167

File: 1603684227709.png (133.62 KB, 344x702, faggotry.png)


No. 660172

>>660167
>>660166

I was just waiting for /ot/ to get unlocked so I could post about this!

Anyways, I am actually quite glad that other countries are standing up for this sort of thing, not just for Hetalia, but for pretty much everything that the western wokefags choose to call ~Pwowematic~

It's seriously tirying when I can't enjoy something because some random person on the Internet comes to me and goes "Oh you little brainwashed poc wahman~ you seriously don't seem to understand how offensive this is for you, but don't fear! I will educate you on how do you have to behave and blah blah blah…"

Just shut up and let me enjoy my cute anime boys in peace!

No. 660187

>>660172

Also, sorry for samefagging but I love how they deflect the blame here.

>Gringo is a term in spanish to make fun of Americans, and it's being use to let them know to stop with the hero complex

>"Th-those poor poor black people being oppresed by white Latinxs"

Because latinos are poc or white depending on the situation kek

No. 660190

>>660166
>>660167
I love how they play the victim " ir a WHITE latino You can't call me a gringo"

We are white for them when we call then out, but when they have to use us for woke points then we are poc

No. 660192

well, gringo is a slur, as "sudaca" is a slur in spain. latins (fuck that inclusive shit, isn't "latin" neutral enough already?) will call everything that comes from USA, Canada or that might look gringo enough will be called gringo, although the evidently over-usage of the word has soften the slur part of it. it's common to hear americans in South America calling themselves gringos. i wish these ignorant "woke" twats would shut up already with the word tinfoiling, pah.

No. 660207

>>660166
>white latines
What did they mean by this?

>>660187
Honestly this, loving how the same people screech and yell about wypipo appropriating sugar skulls or something but then this comes up and suddenly latinos are white.

No. 660218

>>660166
I come from probably the most racist country in Latin America but no one here calls afroamericans "gringos". No one. Here it isn't a slur either, it's just used to refer to white people, mostly from Europe. It can be used as an insult, but it'll be towards non-latin white people, almost exclusively
This also reminds me of white people "educating" latinos for using "negro" to refer to black people. Negro it's just the spanish translation fot "Black", it isn't a slur per se, like the n-word. There were people "cancelling" J Balvin for having a song called "Negro" and he was just referring to the color. They're just so dumb, being an ignorant sjw like them might be exhausting

No. 660219

>>660207
lots of south american people pass as white, yet we are still latinos. and gringo is not a slur smh. burgerfags don't know what else to bitch about. i would invite them to spend 24 hours on any latin american country and see what a difficult life is like. what true oppression is like

No. 660220

>>660218
argentina? lol same

No. 660225

>>660166

I mean it sometimes is used as a racial slur. I guess the counterargument is that it can also be used in a friendly tone, though you could have said the same thing about the N word a couple hundred years ago.

No. 660226

>>660207
latino isn't a race, only amerifags think it is

No. 660228

>>660219
Lots of South Americans pass as white, mostly because they ARE white. Latino isn’t a race. You can be both white and Latino. You can also be black and Latino.

No. 660229

>>660219
You pass for white because you're the descendants of white colonizers who never left, so you guys ARE white. Reminds me of people saying Kat von D is a poc.

No. 660231

>>660228
i know anon, im one of them. but every time i say im white, everyone gets their panties in a bunch (from both sides)

No. 660233

>>660231
That's because they're dumb and dont know the bare minimum about your country and the American countinent as a whole, dont pay attention to them.

No. 660244

File: 1603741300734.jpg (55.29 KB, 649x680, yywEcjd.jpg)

I'll just leave this here…

1/2

No. 660245


No. 660246

>>660190
>We are white for them when we call then out, but when they have to use us for woke points then we are poc
It's exactly like this, it's impressive. One moment I'm a poor brown person living in the middle of the jungle with macaws, but the other moment I'm a white latino crushing black americans under my heel? What the hell? I knew twitter sjws did not give a single fuck for any person living in a third world country, but this is something else. Now all the gringos are crying about muh first world issues
>>660218
The "negro" discourse is truly the funniest shit to me. That rainbow six siege game had a huge confusion start because Spanish and Portuguese speaking players were getting banned for saying an item's name, "Espelho Negro" lit. "Black Mirror". We cannot even have our own language without asspained individuals trying to infiltrate it and tell us what our words mean.

No. 660247

File: 1603741360808.jpg (60.5 KB, 750x720, g8tRggU.jpg)

2/2

No. 660249

>>660244
This is a parody right

No. 660250

>>660244
tragic

No. 660254

>>660247
I hope she's getting bullied

No. 660258

>>660244
What kind of "I'm more special than everyone else and not like other girls!!!!11!" bullshit is this

No. 660260

>>660247
ok this is just a joke, i'm like 95% sure it's making fun of "bi lesbians"

No. 660263

>>660244
>>660247
This has to be a troll.

No. 660264

>>660246
Most SJWs are Americans, they're the same people who argue about whether non-Anglo Europeans are actually white while also saying that native north Africans are white oppressors that killed all the black people in Ancient Egypt. Don't bother trying to make any sense out of anything SJWs and anti-SJWs say.

No. 660265

File: 1603742481170.jpeg (688.36 KB, 1242x1514, 22ED2FE8-3503-45D9-9CA8-B3012D…)

>>660263
It definitely is, but they’re RTing from real accounts with unironic retardo takes like this.

No. 660266

>>660265
god the rena pfp

No. 660281

>>660265

To be honest, I'm still not sure if is trolling or actually being serious, but either way, I thought it was pretty funny.

No. 660284

>>660281
This is a different account that is legitimate, unfortunately.
>active since Nov 2014

No. 660361

File: 1603751266374.jpg (46.67 KB, 541x680, Z7LLuGH.jpg)

>>660218
>>660246

Same energy.

No. 661440

File: 1603880414821.jpg (47.39 KB, 720x347, Straightfacefish.jpg)

Makes me kek. Wasnt she everyones lord and saviour before?

No. 661442

>>661440
What did I miss, where is this allegation coming from?

No. 661449

File: 1603882098912.jpg (Spoiler Image, 127.76 KB, 680x1430, quitbeingafagDD.jpg)

>>661442
It's a stupid allegation, but it's from this drawing. I'm pretty sure it's been stated she was a minor when she made this too.
and it is indeed funny as fuck

No. 661452

>>661449
oh samefag but i was wrong, she was actually 20

No. 661455

>>661452
so, one drawing from 13 years ago when internet was a VERY different place, people are really grasping at straws.

No. 661465

>>661455

The current moral panic would have all minors completely repress anything sexual until they turn 18. What could go wrong?

No. 661492

>>661465
How is that related to an adult drawing lewd shit depicting underaged characters? Are we really defending adults sexualizing minors?

No. 661512

>>661492

I read that she was 16 when she did that comic, I haven't seen any sauce on her being 20 other than anon asserting it. I can't research it myself because no joke, cartoon porn of minors is very illegal where I live.

No. 661665

File: 1603905022764.jpeg (179.87 KB, 750x712, 40733677-9FF1-4AAD-ABDC-AF1755…)

1/2
apparently this cunt is 19 and uses neopronouns which would explain her thin skin

No. 661667

File: 1603905093975.jpeg (137.55 KB, 750x526, D676E855-34FA-426B-AFF8-393B8C…)


No. 661671

>>661665
>use it without knowing the meaning
No we know, delusional schizo retard

No. 661683

>>661667
I do hate when people say shit like
"omg you are actually, literally being psychotic right now!"
Based on someone raising their voice or some shit. Not because it's ableist but because it's something dramatic retards say

No. 661808

>>661440
>appeals to woke crowd
>they turn on her
Every time.

No. 661926

>>661808

I'm not so sure that's true. It's pretty hard to turn a blind eye to it but most of them are doing a convincing job of that.

No. 662566

>>660265
>>660247
>>660244

This bi/pan/mspec/straight lesbian junk gets my blood boiling. If I can find the exchange again I'll post the screenshot, but someone asked "can lesbians be attracted to men?" and someone in the responses had the fucking gall to say "yes because men can be feminine"

No. 662570

File: 1603992727410.png (21.5 KB, 575x217, Capture.PNG)

the consequences of publicly engaging in…what, steven universe? she-ra? these people need to go outside

No. 662584

>>662566
I hate this shit. Remember some retard saying something along the lines of the term lesbian can mean what you want it to be stop dictating others sexualities!!! Also the phrase “stop dictating others sexualities” is the most repeated phrase every, they always say it.

No. 662587

File: 1603993535076.jpg (101.47 KB, 720x859, aids.jpg)

Show me your best surprise face, anons.

No. 662589

File: 1603993569301.jpg (93.01 KB, 686x1024, aids2.jpg)


No. 662591

>>662570
I think it means Hetalia or South Park or something like that

No. 662622

>>661440
>>661449
I think it may be as well because CN just released a (very cringy) anti-racism PSA where Garnet makes a shippy comment about two kids who just met

No. 662791

>>662622

… did they HAVE to use Steven Universe for this? Like, regarless of my own opinions, no one at CN thought it was a bad idea, like make a short about 2 boys getting all lovey dovey, when people have Sugar under the radar for her Ed Edd and Eddy drawings.

Also, the ~Use your privilege to help~ message in the tweet, totally a good thing to send to the kids!1!!!!1 NO

No. 662836

File: 1604013701224.jpeg (130.61 KB, 720x1440, Eldhs-0VMAAl2bL.jpeg)

>raped
This actually makes my blood boil. These men are so fucking transparent

No. 662844

>>662836

They talk about rape and murder so calmly like if they lack of any sort of empathy.

No. 662848

>>662836
Implying that the revolution requires rape….?

No. 662893

>>662836
are twitter commies unable to experience human emotion?

No. 662894

>>662836
I hate twitter commie dudebros so much, holy shit

No. 662904

>>660166
Am I bugging? I know late response but I'm pretty sure gringo is what Hispanics sometimes call white people. Its not the nicest word i think but not like calling a black person the n-word. This coming from a white Hispanic who was called that growing up surrounded by Dominicans and Puerto Ricans that was tanner with curlier hair or black Hispanic.

These Twitter people really look dumb and don't know shit.

No. 663788

File: 1604147359156.jpg (143.09 KB, 591x753, 97867.jpg)

Black male culture is garbage to begin with but when they are weebs too it becomes insufferable.

No. 663791

>>663788
Being a greasy, obnoxious and annoying male otaku is a pretty universal thing, different languages and races won't prevent them from bothering female nerds for not being as greasy as they are. It's the exact same behavior as these Japanese guys complaining about fujoshi and creating the word, or "hardcore" gamers all over the planet.

No. 663794

>>663788
I thought the whole 'fake geek girl' thing died

No. 663795

>>663794
It never died, it's just less visible online because of women telling men to fuck off with this meme in the early 2010s. If you go on some imageboards you'll dee a lot more shit

No. 663796

>>663794
It came back mostly among black folks because more and more attractive black women are doing cosplay and talking about anime and it really pisses off black guys who watch generic shit like Jojo.

No. 663798

>>661492
I can't understand this. It's so innately bizarre to me to shit your pants "R-rebecca sugar is a LITERAL pedophile" because of edgy ed edd and eddy smut she drew in her teens. What the hell? You really believe that? Are the anons entertaining this twitterfags themselves?

No. 663808

File: 1604149290731.jpg (50.4 KB, 439x680, EgOCHDUXoAUXimV.jpg)


No. 663809

>>663791
why do men still act like being a weeb is some achievement to gatekeep? it's like I still know you're addicted to hentai, kek. Anons, you haven't cringed till you heard dudes reference hentai and the most basic anime memes irl… it wasn't just white guys either. truly a universal illness

No. 663810

>>663809
They have a trauma from being bullied in high school by other men and they lash out on women because scrotes will never admit that men have a problem

No. 663812

>>663808
that's a flex? embarrassing
>>663810
the irony is that girl weebs and fujos have always existed. Did these guys not notice or did they think they deserved to be bullied instead?

No. 663813

>>663808
Why do men act like this only happened to them? If u watched anime at all u were a laughing stock in middle school…

No. 663820

>>663813
Hypocrisy and misogyny maybe. I know some guys judged the girls for being ugly or awkward while being that way themselves. Meanwhile we know they hate fujoshis, who aren't cultured enough to drool over the most depraved hentai like them. Being a girl somehow makes it different to them I guess, they only have their own backs

No. 663821

>>663820
Like most men they don't see fujoshis or awkward women as women because they're not attractive enough, and to men only the women they want to fuck matter. The moment they see a beautiful woman being into cosplay and anime they go full incel mode.

No. 663853

>>663808
the blatant misogyny is obviously stupid, but also unsurprising. speaking as a young millennial, it is a bit jarring how much the cultural tide shifted in favor of nerdom, especially in the last decade. being really into anime, japanese shit, vidya, and the internet all used to be viewed in an extremely unbecoming and unusual light. even by the time i was in college, anime was still viewed by most as those weird chinese cartoons, and the vast majority of vocal enthusiasts were still just stereotypical gross weeaboos and disgruntled neckbeards, very much making it a boys' club. the older you got, the more hard pressed you were to find women who wanted to associate with this weird, unwelcoming crowd, even if they were interested in the same things. nerd shit has always been extremely misogynistic and hostile towards women, so the hot take in the picture is an attitude that's been carried over. it's not as woke to hate women in your hobby anymore, but the attitude never went away despite nerd shit becoming a mainstream interest.

i do think there are more clout seeking thots than ever reaching for popularity and attention amongst desperate men– and now, given nerdom's mainstream success, fame, as well– who have latched onto this formerly niche hobby/subculture, but women with genuine interest have always outnumbered them, even if silently, and will continue to do so.

No. 663854

>>663788
>>663808
This argument is so tired. Any time a girl or woman talks about anime, here come these motherfuckers to quiz us, call us attention seekers (and then break out into a long-winded spiel about how they used to get bullied…oh the irony), or to call our tastes mid/subpar. What they fail to realize is, in actuality, they got bullied because they were fucking weird outside of their interest in anime. Girls and women have always been fans of anime, but they don't make it their personality like these musty ass dudes.

No. 663860

>>662893
*Ancom

No. 663868

>>663808
I bet this bitch only watched Naruto Shippuden and DBZ with the American dubs and thinks that makes him an actual cultured nerd.

No. 663873

>>663820
>>663821
They're not nerdy enough to interact with axtual fujoshi irl and online, they're the fake nerdy guys all along.

No. 663878

>>661449
Wait, who are these characters? It's ugly as fuck

No. 663887

>>663878
from a kids show called ed, edd, and eddy

No. 663909

although I was quiet, I was largely ignored by everyone in early highschool for my interests in video games and anime. too weird for the girls, but also too ugly for the boys that actually shared my interests.

hate those types

No. 663922

>>663808
I don't get this sentiment. There are entire genres of anime and manga targeted to young girls and women. Many famous anime and manga series were written by women. It was always common to see girls discussing anime online on forums, creating fansites, making fanart, making AMVs, etc. I genuinely don't see how somebody can think that girls never watched anime until now unless they're completely ignorant.

Gamers, weebs, and geeks with persecution complexes are so annoying.

No. 663924

>>663808
I hate how men like to pretend something is ruined just because girls like it.

No. 663925

>>663922
Men don't have to even notice the existence of women because it never threatens them. Women always have to be aware of being women when we are around men. It's only when it's extremely attractive woman doing something they notice "wow female".

No. 663985

>>663922
They don't actually care about manga and anime as a whole despite describing themselves as anime and manga fans, usually they only care about anime adaptations of manga from the Shonen Jump magazine, and if you're really lucky enough, that includes things older than BNHA that aren't One Piece, Naruto and DBZ (never Dragon Ball though, for some reason). Whenever I see these people online trying to question me I ask them questions about classic insanely popular shojo manga and they don't even know them. You could talk about Ai Yazawa and they'd be absolutely clueless.

Men who actually know about different genre and authors usually don't give a shit or are happy to share their hobbies with other regardless of gender ime, I talked to many guys who genuinely recommended me series and I'd do the same in return, those were fun conversations, usually in anime cons. The only time I've seen this shit in a con was when a bunch of talented girls were selling prints of Fire Emblem characters and some guy wouldn't stop asking if they were real fans and were asking stupid obscure questions on the series and the girls couldn't convince him to fuck off. This is despite the fact that these games were so popular with girls from the very beginning that there are many Ogma/Navarre doujinshi out here that are way older than the vast majority of fans. I've aso met too many men who think they're hardcore games for playon CoD and FIFA and who had NO clue about insanely famous series like Street Fight, Resident Evil, Pokemon or Final Fantasy or whatever the fuck.

No. 663990

>>663808
Yeah that's because you watched DBZ and Naruto exclusively you fucking faggot

No. 663999

File: 1604171967786.jpg (57.49 KB, 331x591, 755564.jpg)

>>663808
This guys really just hates black women

No. 664000

>>663999
Tbh I kinda get it. I used to be the weird kid for watching anime too and now it's cool and mainstream.

No. 664002

>>664000
Yeah but he’s saying “females” when this yard looks like he JUST started watching anime himself and only the popular ones,

No. 664003

>>664000
Ok but how is it a female thing? Normie males hopped on the trends too

No. 664009

>>664000
Don't worry, I still think you're weird for watching cartoons as an adult.

No. 664012

>>663854
>What they fail to realize is, in actuality, they got bullied because they were fucking weird outside of their interest in anime. Girls and women have always been fans of anime, but they don't make it their personality like these musty ass dudes.
This lol. Incels get so triggered seeing girls enjoy the same nerdy interests while also being attractive and actually having a life unlike them. Men are so one-track minded I swear.

No. 664025

>>663808
mfers say they are otakus yet not know what the Year 24 group is

No. 664029

>>664000
Didn't Megan Thee Stallion talk about liking Inuyasha since she was a kid?
I really think it's more that this entire generation kind of grew up with anime in their lives, so of course newer, younger artists will openly embrace it more.
The only ones who come off as fake to me are those who've been in the industry since forever and are only just now jumping on the bandwagon.
These scrotes are just mad because some women have the nerve to be attractive, not in a relationship with them and not be broke and while enjoying anime.

>>663985
>Whenever I see these people online trying to question me I ask them questions about classic insanely popular shojo manga and they don't even know them. You could talk about Ai Yazawa and they'd be absolutely clueless.
Basically this. I've seen some men try to weasel out of this situation by saying "N-No, I only watch good anime, heh". Nice try, fake fan.

No. 664069

>>664029
>I've seen some men try to weasel out of this situation by saying "N-No, I only watch good anime, heh"
Imagine the meltdown that would happen if you replied like this to a scrote quizzing you about Nerutu Sand Ninjas, My Litle Sister Can't Be This Pedo or some other waifu bait.

No. 664081

>>664009
kek, do you even know where you are?

No. 664098

>>664029
And then the "I only watch good anime" doesn't work because they either cite trash like Naruto Shippuden, like not even the manga as a whole but the part where it turns to complete shit, and they only argue about powerlevel instead of liking things for their stories or characters. Then you recommend them things they may still like based on their taste and they don't want to listen because it's less than 70 volumes long or not recent enough.

No. 664105

>>664081
The "this used to be a site about anime" shit is really dumb. Facebook used to be a site used to rate womens fuckability and now your grandma uploads her christmas cookies onto it. Weebs suck.

No. 664107

>>664081
this ain't 4chan my dude

No. 664144

>>664081
It’s okay anon, it’s a lolcow inside joke At this point. The bitches who hate anime the most are bitches who watch anime.

No. 664392

File: 1604231678031.png (304.51 KB, 1048x1584, 1603736147702.png)

>>663788
I got bullied from both boys and girls for even mentioning I liked anime or geeky stuff, I don't get this garbage incel argument. Literally the same dudes that picked on girls for liking nerdy stuff turning around and calling us fakes, lol. I think the other anons are right too, girls just kind of have to keep up appearances if they like geeky shit or the bullying gets ten times worse.
I mean there's bitches like momokun that will marathon an anime or a game and immediately go out and buy a sexy cosplay to cash on it, but again it's these same coomers giving them easy money so what gives? blame coomers for the fakes

No. 664740

>>663808
>>663999
idk what these communities are like in other countries, but in scandinavia anime and cosplay and all types of weeb communities and conventions have always been run by like 90% girls. video games have always been a male oriented hobby but anime and manga has been mostly consumed by girls (again, at least in my country). i feel like this guys take is just false and delusional

No. 665276

File: 1604344493487.jpeg (102.48 KB, 774x960, 95715349-FD58-406A-ADA5-C0E615…)


No. 665279

>>665276
Unhop please. Reverse hop.

No. 665280

File: 1604344972029.png (70.6 KB, 231x302, b2a580ee-e943-477c-b3a8-8682a7…)


No. 665283

>>665276
Lmao it looks like his mom tried aborting him

No. 665287

>>665276
He looks like a Hartley Hooligan drawn from memory.

No. 665303

>>665276
Mm. A guy with greasy, unkempt hair, sunken in face framed by coke bottle glasses, a wifebeater and a can of Monster energy drink. What girl wouldn't fall for this magnificent beast?

No. 665317

>>665276
he legit looks like kids whose mothers drank during pregnancy

No. 665327

>>665276
There's no way I could talk to this dude about abortion in person without laughing in his face. His face is just laugh-inducing. Why do people dunk on themselves like this?

No. 665394

>>663985
>usually they only care about anime adaptations of manga from the Shonen Jump magazine
This. Fake ass faggots call others "fake fans" and then turn around to watch only Netflix shit and Shounen Jump adaptations and then call people who like the more underground material stupid weeb nerds for being "too invested". Casualfags are the absolute cancer I swear.

No. 668221

File: 1604691791210.png (65.31 KB, 678x587, 8951890e-e348-4f4f-935d-9fa8ab…)

The people asking for money are annoying like we are in a pandemic I get it its hard but shit everyone's fucked. Try and look for another job or buy less things, move back home or with friend. Fuckin adjust.
Shit im fucking gay and lost my job cause of covid. Can I get money too????

No. 668305

>>668221
New account, RTs black artists, then does nothing but beg for money. Definitely not a scam kek

No. 668344

>>668221
>"burner" in the username of the account
oh no there is totally nothing sus about that at all!! not at all!

No. 668671

I am so beyond sick of all the twitterfags in the Shay thread. Every third post has "is sending me" or the dumnb "it's the [x] for me"
And every single time someone compares her to something else, the response is "Don't do [x] like that"
twitter e-whores please attempt to integrate reee

No. 669342

File: 1604842470370.jpg (91.79 KB, 1080x950, f885b87f-4379-4199-b4b9-4dd1fa…)

This take is retarded, so of course it got reposted on Instagram and Tumblr where a more retards agreed with it.

No. 669351

>>669342
I didn't get diagnosed til my thirties. I passed as 'she just has an anxiety problem' for that many years. I'm sure as hell going to include the fact that I'm high functioning when I disclose my diagnosis to people. Like yes its important to differentiate.

No. 669364

>>669342

Such a stupid hot take that's supposed to sound woke but just shows how out of touch with reality people like this are.

No. 669368

>>669342
The only autistic people these twitter idiots ever saw are fictional male characters who are geniuses who solve crimes while looking dumb as fuck or rude and nothing else, there's no other reason to say something this stupid. I bet if they saw low functioning autists who are super strong and violent, can't talk and just spend their time smearing shit on walls for fun they wouldn't even realize that these patients also have autism because of how severe it can be.

No. 669372

>>669342
Reply with this video

No. 669373

>>669342
why does it always have to be muh aspergurs every TWO FUCKING SECONDS. why does everyone have to mention this shit every two seconds? cant tell whats worse, this fake woke autism shit or the beepeedee sexwork kweens.

No. 669376

>>669373
The funny thing is..the man that aspergers was named after was linked to nazis. Professionals no longer use the term aspergers for that reason. So saying shit like 'I'm on the spectrum' and 'I'm high functioning autistic' is already the pc version of saying it…what do these tards want now?

No. 669382

>>669342
I have worked with severely autistic people who'd start masturbating in the middle of street or can't communicate in any other way than growling or screaming and I just know that these self-diagnosed autists don't even consider themselves on the same level as those people.

No. 669395

>>669342
haha my god it's this discourse again from the woke (most likely) self dxers that wear mental health conditions like badges on their chest, while for the rest of us it's an active liability.
also obligatory reminder that mental conditions are not some funny little club with a bouncer at the door, you can't gatekeep something like that. there is no gatekeeping because there is no gate, you're either in or you're out

No. 669400

>>669342
These people keep hammering in the message about how autistic people are just regular normal people with super special savant features but still demand you to excuse any socially destructive thing they do because of muh illness. Now they're started pushing the narrative that those dirty low-functioning autists aren't ~TRUE~ autists, their severe behavior is just caused by comorbid intellectual disabilities that are totes not autism because autism is supposed to be cool quirky detective characters. Bitch low-functioning autism is the diagnosis given to a brain abnormality, that's literally the intellectual disability they have.

No. 669431

I'm autistic and wish I were more normal. I'd be further ahead in life if I didn't keep losing jobs due to it.

No. 669495

File: 1604862796297.jpeg (259.43 KB, 750x809, 652CBEA6-A6FE-4454-B7A4-32D164…)

Can someone give their two cents on this? Currently my brain cells can’t process what this is about.

No. 669498

>>669495
They think that somehow they are women and therefore are not predator which is the most stupid logic. I can't even understand this, majority of men I met claiming to be trans then stopped being trans says they did it as a fetish and to be in women spaces. Also, women can be predators too if they really think being mtf is going to save face, it won't.

No. 669500

>>669495
It's insinuating that the reason people view trans women in bathrooms as predatory, despite there being a lack of basis for it, is that their real issue is bc they perceive these women to be men and that's rooted in already personally being subjected to misogyny. By viewing every trans women as harmful/dangerous when they just want to use the bathroom, is inherently misogynistic as well though.

No. 669503

>>669500

Girl… no. Lol

No. 669511

>>669500
But they are men.

No. 669512

>>669500
Honey you have a big storm coming

No. 669516

>>669500
Trans women thinking they are subject to misogyny the same as actual women is the biggest lie I have heard. I don't want a guy in my spaces who only can be there by a claim. If you cosplay like a woman but act like an entitled man then expect women to put up with this shit is exactly the shit that is misogynistic. Imagine feeling so entitled as a man to think women have to deal with men being in their spaces and should like it, the fuck no.

No. 669517

>>669500
just go back to twitter

No. 669518

Don't reply to bait.

No. 669519

>>669382
This is what I hate, because those people you mentioned aren't likely even able to speak for themselves in the movement. It's as if they don't exist within their own community. Yet apparently we have to "listen to autistic people!! apply the same view to every one of us! low-functioning is a construct!!!" I hate these woke high-functioning (or fake) autistic twitter users so much, they say "don't speak over autistic people" when that's exactly what they are doing.

No. 669520

File: 1604865058576.png (322.97 KB, 1702x780, Screenshot 2020-11-08 at 2.50.…)


No. 669531

>>669495
>stop trying to frame trans women as predators when in reality you're just scared of men being predatory

Who the fuck isn't afraid of men being predatory, especially when they can get access to more private places meant for women? Troons are outed as creeps and predators transitioning to escape consequences all the time. Why is this so hard for people to accept? Why are women so bent on making this a thing?

No. 669532

>>669500
why are people responding to this godawful bait please stop

No. 669555

>>669532
Not everyone who advocates for trans people is bait.

No. 669570

>>669519
The people saying "don't speak over autistic people" are always the same ones claiming self diagnosis is valid… the irony of basically saying everyone is free to call themselves autistic while also saying not to speak over autistic people is just… how do they not see it?

No. 669577

>>669568
In reality if you are classed as low functioning it means governments will often spend a good chunk of change on putting you through special education and providing supports to parents, extended support into adulthood. You often have adult daycentres to attend, housing provided etc. It's classed like that so those people most in need of help can have their needs catered to. God knows why these twiiter autists jump to thinking about nazis and eugenics.

No. 669585

>>669555
You can't advocate for trans rights on here if you know a majority of people will disagree with you.

Guess what that's called?

No. 669611

File: 1604877235101.png (55.64 KB, 656x774, day of the rope2.png)

fuck trannies and fuck zoophiles

No. 669615

File: 1604877656633.png (49.01 KB, 652x670, oh no.png)


No. 669645

>>669615
Why do they think that those unknowingly offending their closet zoo/MAP friends (translation: animal abusers/pedos) care? If I said “wanting to fuck dogs/kids is gross” and a friend was hurt by that I think that reflects more on them than me. I’d be glad to offend those type of freaks. Why do these people think they’re to be treasured lol

No. 669965

File: 1604924247721.png (798.72 KB, 810x1443, 75E0A3D3-142A-444C-BB5B-662F06…)

Sage for slight sperg/long explanation

I’m not saying he’s perfect or anything but Tom (head writer of Apex Legends, a battle Royale game with a diverse cast of characters-including three well rounded LGBT members) gets so much shit it’s ridiculous. The amount of entitled ass, whiny adults I see in his replies all the time.

For context, Caustic (only cis White male in the game) has beef with Crypto (Korean male) character repeatedly due to an event that occurred in last seasons story. He calls everyone some form of rat (because he’s a scientist and they’re all lab rats) and apparently when he called the Korean a gutter rat that was ‘anti Asian’ and they actually removed the line last season.

This time the SJWs have their panties in a twist because Crypto mutters something in Korean at Caustic, obviously angry at him. Caustic replies ‘don’t hide behind your language’ (aka, don’t be a pussy and just say it to me up front). Any logical fucking person, including the Korean VA, could see that it’s not racist and just him bickering.

But nope, apparently it’s racist and that the writers are all ‘anti poc’ and ‘never respect their fans’ (despite changing that voice line last season to accomodate their whiny asses). Never mind the fact that he wasn’t insulting his race, just the fact that he’s deliberately omitting what he wants to say using Korean. Twitter and tumblr idiots forget that not every white person speaks English, and that the exact same thing could’ve happened to the Icelandic or French character had he been pissed at them. I’m white as snow but naturally, if I started busting out japanese or Norwegian at someone I was mad at, they’d assume I’m being bitchy. No critical thinking skills

No. 670100

>>669965
Well, now I know where the bitchy overwatch fandom went. They went to apex legends and scream MUH RACISMS at everything. This is what happens when you pander to the woke retards.

No. 670789

File: 1605017504389.jpg (94.86 KB, 801x900, brainlet shit.jpg)

oh my god

No. 670793

>>669615
So basically give people a false sense of security, then immediately call the cops when they tell you they fuck kids and dogs. Hmmm, not a bad strat actually.

No. 670802

>>670793
I do something similar when I start dating a guy. I act like I'm the most open minded person sexually and guys end up telling me about how they've fucked trannys in the past and whatever other weird shit they are into thinking I'm so cool with it.. and I dump.

I had a housemate years ago who was a crossdresser and fucking men behind his gfs back while telling me how boring and close minded she is. I think that's where I got the idea to do it.

No. 670813

>>670789
This one made me laugh out loud

>>670793
>>670802
Genius idea, weed out the degenerates

No. 670819

>>670802
Reading things like this makes me hate men even more.

No. 670829

>>670802
That is a very good strategy

No. 670848

>>670802
I do this too and it's honestly worked quite a lot. Men are so eager to tell you their degenerate wank fantasies.

No. 671527

>>670802
lolcow dating strategy thread when?

No. 671529

>>670802
i tried this once and the guy felt comfortable enough to admit to me that he was a pedo, i didn't take it any further and reported all of his accounts to law enforcement but needless to say i'm still terrified of getting involved with men again

No. 672001

>>671529

This is the flaw in the plan. What if some scrote tells you he likes to murder hookers and now you've got a whole dead men tell no tales situation.

No. 672397

>>671529
Was it Jared Fogle?

Hats off to the lady who took him down though, she not only had to sit through a lot of disgusting phone calls but she had to pretend to be into it just to get the FBI their evidence. Even though it was for a good cause, that would have fucked me up.

No. 672921

File: 1605233954229.png (412.46 KB, 591x723, kek.png)

Some random egirl wants to sue Riot Games because she's delusional kek. She claims that a champion named Seraphine is based on her because she dated a Riot employee for three months.

https://twitter.com/step_nie/status/1326939261900259329?s=20

No. 672926

>>672921
Having pink hair, glasses, and a cat are some of the most basic traits I can think of lol. I hate that this shit just gives gamer boys more fuel to hate women over though. She's embarrassing as opportunistic and this whole thing is cringy but so many replies are just like "femoids amiright".

No. 672942

>>672921
NTA with the egirl but reading the article, it goes a lot more in depth. The dude took her over to Riot HQ, framed an essay the chick gave him as a gift (she was apparently a fan of the game itself) and shared it around with his co-workers, asked her to voice a “super secret project” and got the artists to draw her as a character in the game, all of which is attached in there.

Dudes can do some really desperate shit to get attention and the dates line up for development time. He and the chick met on Twitter and only dated for three months and he did all that shit during that brief time. Am I a retard for thinking some Silicon Valley cuck working for a company with a rep with women as Riot Games does would do something like this for a random pretty face?

tried to sage for all the sperging cause newfag. Hope it worked

No. 672943

>>672942
Samefag, i meant to say TINDER not TWITTER. Maybe I really am retarded

No. 672945

>>672926
Men will hate women anyways. Always.

No. 672947

>>672921
I've seen more disgusting coomers saying the character looks like disgusting belle delphine so this is new and very concerning if is true,sadly everyone will laugh at her because this incident already happen with the champion "irelia" a random asian took over instagram yeling at the void saying her face was stolen and dumb shit so..

No. 672956

File: 1605240503347.png (151.02 KB, 642x569, fasfsaffaf.png)

>>672942
The dates don't actually line up at all, furthermore here's input from a woman who actually worked at Riot on skins/KDA related shit. In short, just your average utterly delusional egirl. Virtually impossible for everyone who gets involved in several different departments of a triple A studio to just come together and rip off some random twitter thot because she dated someone who wasn't, by her own words, responsible for anything design wise in any way.

No. 672958

>>672956
Samefag from before, thanks for the new info anon.
For the record Stellari also said Riot is probably mad at potential leaks. So like yeah, the e-thot is wrong but she was probably being lied to by whoever “John” is.

Wonder if they’re gonna spot the dude and kick him out, since thot here actually has art made under the Riot brand, so it did involve guy being a creepy egotist to woo egirl to some degree

No. 673104

>>672958
>Wonder if they’re gonna spot the dude and kick him out
Riot has already said in this statement that he's an ex-employee

No. 673107

>>670802
I do this all the time. Needless to say 90% of men aren't a romantic option

No. 673769

https://twitter.com/arraivals/status/1324817134317412361?s=21
What the fuck did I just read(imageboard)

No. 673815

File: 1605339681965.png (86.85 KB, 680x306, 207.png)

This new "What Is Something That Isn't Racist But Still Feels Racist To You?" Trend is a fascinating glimpse into the mind of the average Twitter user. I can't imagine going through life and having "feelings" that random things are racist.

No. 673819

>>673815
In tongues? Like… dead languages or just foreign languages? I've never heard 'speaking in tongues' outside of the context of exorcisms

No. 673828

>>673819
Tongues as in when people go to church and god takes over their bodies, or they’re communicating with the spirits. I’m sure it exists in other religious cultures that I’m not well read on, I just do know that it’s tied to African Americans and coastal cultures and that those practices specifically are what the tweet is referencing. This video recently went viral in African and African American communities and is an example of what that tweet is talking about. She starts speaking in tongues at 1:54.

No. 673887

File: 1605353619519.jpeg (257.32 KB, 750x546, D5E59545-5596-4DE9-8275-18EC2E…)

Wtf is up with the claiming slurs trend on twitter, do ppl do this because theyve actually been called these things or as an excuse for being assholes?

No. 673907

>>673887
way to be edgy while still maintaing "woke" image

No. 673938

>>673815
I'm black and distinctly remember my mom taking me to baptist church where I was asked to do this in Sunday school and nearly broke down at the age of 8 because I could not comprehend the concept. It just sounded like gibberish but the teacher was so passionate about it. I couldn't fake it

No. 673955

>>673815

Moses Sumeny? Oh no not him lmao, I really like his music

No. 673997

>>649791
Gas the kpop twitter fandom

No. 674083

>>673887
I'd bet money every one of those accounts saying they can say "fag" is a fakeboi

No. 674177

>>673815
What's fascinating to me are anons getting uptight about Twitter users sharing their racial experience and getting big mad over it. What's cringy about this beyond you not being in on the joke?

No. 676055

File: 1605636264607.jpeg (446.02 KB, 828x1091, D81BA234-9FF7-4069-A43F-8FC102…)

I hate these “clapback” quote tweets. Just enjoy the video, it’s not that deep.
The replies are all saying that anyone who likes historical clothing is definitely racist, as if fashion history isn’t a subject that people of all races study.

No. 676057

>>676055
Idk, that's kind of a funny response kek. I don't think she was implying that liking fashion history makes you racist, but if that's actually a thing people do, that's obviously retarded.

No. 676060

>>676057
Nta but that user isn't implying being into fashion history makes you racist, she's just implying white people are racist

No. 676062

>>676057
>>676060
The replies to her qrt are where people are saying anyone into pre-1980’s fashion is racist. Her post itself isn’t saying people who like historical fashion are racist.

No. 676063

>>676055
I just don't like that she's focusing on it being racial when the original video caption is more about historical sexism.

No. 676077

>>676063
I hate when twitterfags think sexism is ok when compared to racism.

No. 676127

>>676055
Is she not aware that Black women would wear fashion like that as well?

I swear people say the edgiest shit just for clout.

No. 676131

File: 1605644248948.jpeg (12.66 KB, 126x288, 0E88B1D4-156F-44B3-A40D-313DAE…)

>>676127
I hate that ignorance so much. There are many pictures even on pinterest of black women in their times' styles. But I guess she wanted quick clout for a low hanging fruit.
The replies sound idiotic. I know racism is sensitive being recent, but come on. no one says we shouldn't have interest in Greek mythology for example— despite slavery, misogyny, and pedophilia in that society then rape and incest directly in the myths. Also, sexism has been around forever and remains relevant too, why is that treated like something to "get over" in comparison?

No. 676172

File: 1605649498079.png (466.62 KB, 798x912, 8935893.png)

>>676055
I like historical fashion, and I just thought the post was funny.
I don't think she's reducing the work of dressing that way or sexism as a whole, she's just commenting on the wider context of this particular time period. What should she have said? "Wow, mad respect to massa's wife"? It's not that bad, kek.
Also, I liked this response.
https://twitter.com/scoutvenus/status/1328738721781452802

No. 676372

File: 1605673632476.jpg (308.09 KB, 1080x1039, Screenshot_20201117-202301.jpg)

Do men have any hobbies that aren't centered around trying to get their dick wet

No. 676387

>>676372
I'm no expert but I think he was also into politics

No. 676392

>>676372
At least he admits it was embarrassing in retrospect. Some men never do, unfortunately.

Although the description of the women he would try to hit on is cringe. It reads like a post from a PUA forum, rather than the former president of the U.S.

No. 676407

>>676372
Everyday I dislike him more and more

No. 676572

>>676407
And why is he still on your mind, anon? To the point where it's every day?!

I voted for him and supported him during his presidency and I don't even think about him anymore. Seek help if you are thinking about him so much.

No. 676574

>>676572
>I voted for him
samefag, I didn't vote for him (I was 12 kek) but my family did and I would've at the time. just wanted to clear that up

No. 676593

File: 1605713076258.jpeg (450.15 KB, 750x1032, C80CABDE-25D7-4205-9935-090411…)

Honestly I agree that the tweets w a shit ton of emojis are annoying but why is this getting attention only now…I thought stan twitter was notorious for these kind of tweets.

No. 676616

>>676593
Kind of funny how ”woke” twitterfags call out people for using words like stupid, dumb, retard but don’t do helpful things like this lol

No. 676649

>>676593
Why do people have to change their twitters so some random blind cunt can read their deep thots

No. 676670

>>676649
>Deep thots
Kek

No. 677123

File: 1605762361339.jpg (162.48 KB, 1125x942, y7aQxeg.jpg)

Strong claims for someone who wrote MLP rape fanfintion.

No. 677127

>>677123
FanFiction* sorry.

No. 677129

>>676649
how big of a chance it even is that a blind person stumbles upon a twitter page of some random? I can sort of understand being inclusive if you are running a huge and important account (ie potus), but come on…

No. 677192

>>652308
Sorry, this is old. But I'm tired of these retards calling themselves ancoms when they've clearly never read theory. What use does sw have in an anarchist society? None, because it's not real work. Learn to bake some bread and grow crops, cunt. Read some Goldman. Admit that you're capitalist scum.

No. 677222

>>677123
This thread was so funny, it was less writing advice and more "waah stop liking what I don't like", he got roasted so much he ended up deleting it in a typical "I'm not owned I'm not owned" way. This dude thinks he is God's gift on Earth when it comes to writing, would anybody be stupid enough to follow his advice?

No. 677254

>>677123
what's with these crazed trannies having a backlog of mlp rape fanfiction

No. 677330

Twitter is thinking it's a good idea to add insta story feature in their site.

No. 677337

>>677330
The little bar on top of the app is so irritating it might be what makes me abandon ship for good.

No. 677376

File: 1605802977896.png (36.85 KB, 592x498, pickme.png)

Of course men immediately gave her creepy comments about her boobs for this but that's probably what she was going for

No. 677430

>>677376
That's Ash she's a pickme who thinks pickmeism will shield her from misogyny. She says misogynist things herself and bends over backwards for the males who still see her as inferior kek

No. 677470

File: 1605809451763.jpeg (300.75 KB, 750x865, BA5BE369-6B7F-4567-9DD3-0A59FC…)

>>677376
Twitter is freaking out and coddling men today I guess, but still gotta blame women.

No. 677479

>>677470
High five, my dudes. You're still on top, making sure that every field women move into is sufficiently fucked over as you move on. You have testicles, yay!

No. 677480

>>677470
Anyone can get away with saying misogynistic crap these days as long as they make clear the women they hate are white lol. We all know why black women make out white women are the anti-christ, but why right-wing white men do it, I don't know. What's their end game?

No. 677486

>>677480
Revenge because white women dated outside their race

No. 677488

>>677470
the addition of "white" is so transparent here, holy shit. Like it really pops out as unnecessary in what he's getting at. how anyone falls for this is pure willful ignorance

No. 677501

>>677470
To me this comes off more racist to me, "Woc never think like that, they must not mean it if I see it, those white karens really mean it"

Meanwhile, myself and other WOC regularly talk shit about Men's day.
It's just like with trans shit, for some reason they think only "White cis men/women" are agaisnt it and everyone else is 100% on board.

No. 677503

>>677470
>white women
This white dude needs to check himself lmao
Also, he's really crying about how people are being mean about international men's day? That shit is fucking NOTHING compared to the disgusting shit men pulls on international women's day and everyday in general kek.

No. 677504

>>677376
hahahah look at the profile pic it screams pick me!!!

No. 677508

>>677504
I know lol I cringe every time I see it.

No. 677531

>>677376
This would have been annoying but reasonable without that last retarded dig at uwu scawy liberal women. Liberal women love men actually, why do you think they let men beat them and call it sex.

No. 677534

>>677531
Yep. Or think fat 50 year old beer gut divorcees are better women than them, cos they whinge how extra laborious it is for them to tweeze out their Lady™ chin hairs.

No. 677543

>>677534
> tweeze out their Lady™ chin hairs
Diff anon. I mean some real women pluck our chins too but without all the oversharing afterwards lol.

Still considered shameful for us but a hot topic of conversation for them! Let me tell you all about my hair removal routine again… because everyone needs to hear about it any time they put an ounce of effort into that shit. They need pats.

No. 677547

>>677480
Because it's a very successful way to shut down discussions about sexism and drive an even bigger wedge between groups of women. Obviously black women have very valid complaints about white women, but dudes (all of them, black men are no exception) don't give a single shit about black women's struggles. By associating feminist arguments or any discussion of sexism whatsoever with uppity old white Karens, they've planted the implication in a lot of stupid people's minds that misogyny isn't actually real and is just made up by racist old white ladies so they can pretend to be oppressed. Not saying racism or sexism is "worse" than the other because that kind of thing is hard to quantify. But it is definitely worse (socially, economically, and politically) to be seen as racist than it is to be seen as sexist. Just look at the reaction on twitter to a white woman wearing cornrows or something vs a black man calling women sexist slurs. Most people don't even bother to call the latter example sexist anymore because it'll get you ridiculed for being a Karen. I knew men never took misogyny seriously, but I have noticed a really worrying trend that a lot of people now seem to think it just straight up doesn't exist.

No. 677571

>>677547
>I have noticed a really worrying trend that a lot of people now seem to think it just straight up doesn't exist.
Agree, I've noticed this too. Every time I try to speak up about issues that women face even the wokest motherfuckers stand up to do the dance you just described - everyone complaining about misogyny and sexism is just a crusty old white bitch wanting to talk to the manager of the patriarchy, making up shit because middle aged women are literally the devil incarnate. Trying to bring up issues regarding porn? Shut up Karen, nobody likes your slut shaming. Talking about women being belittled in the work place? Ugh, I have never seen that happen, you're just making shit up and being overdramatic Karen. Rape and sexual harassment? Well men get raped too so shut your hole, KAREN!

It's enraging. They found a loop hole they can exploit under everyone's eyes and nobody can do shit. You can literally call a woman a dumb roastie as long as you make sure you're talking about white women, when everyone knows it's just your general hate of women of all races.

No. 677578

>>677547
>Obviously black women have very valid complaints about white women
You aren't entitled to our time, space, sympathy ,or energy. Contrary to what you may think. The World doesn't revolve around you.

No. 677583

>>677430
She got a thread here?

No. 677585

>>677578
That's all you got out of that post? Is this a larping male trying to bait?

No. 677586

File: 1605819638848.png (1.01 MB, 1280x1102, Screenshot 2020-11-19 at 20.42…)

>>677571
Agree re: loopholing and men, but a lot of women (especially black) fucking hate white women. And no it isn't uNdERsTaNdAblE. Clearly most white women are NOT Karens, as they seem to be pretty timid when it comes to this topic… not a lot of honesty, even on lolcow.

BW don't really believe they're victimised en masse by ww (stats would debunk this anyhow), they have serious hang-ups regarding black men and their sex appeal and want WW bullied. 9/10 twitter bw sjws confirm this as does Lipstick Alley/Black ladies reddit/ YT comments…

In the comment section BW were agreeing Mrs Duncan must be a white-passing black woman, because there's no way she could be nice and caucasian… I mean they're not exactly subtle kek.

No. 677587

File: 1605819680794.jpeg (166 KB, 750x867, A0515101-DBAA-4FE6-AF78-4CB5B6…)

#MinisterForMen is trending in the U.K. after an MP suggested there should be one in the government, much like there is a Minister for Women.

The poor voiceless men, only having 430 MPs, 66% of the House of Commons. That’s really not fair on them, is it? /s

Sorry for Britpol fagging but I can see this actually happening with the current government.

No. 677588

>>677547
It's all too convenient to divide women like that and watch them attack each other while men sit back and feel cleared of any real sins because 'oh but look at the entitled women'

No. 677589

>>677583
It’s on /pt/ but it’s not very active. IIRC it was started when she was still married to Peter and people thought she was a sex doll he’d dress up and take photos of.

No. 677592

>>677586
You sound kind of schizo, this post doesn't make much sense.
>In the comment section BW were agreeing Mrs Duncan must be a white-passing black woman, because there's no way she could be nice and caucasian…
This is called a joke, anon, lmao.

No. 677594

>>677585
Just ignore them. If they're being serious then they clearly don't know what anon even meant by that.

No. 677596

>>677592
Sorry i am a shit writer lol. The top comment is the classic misogynistic loop hole karen line, but the comments below (which i did not post) were not a joke. As i said, you find this attitude is pretty common amongst bw, ww are seriously naive. 80% of conversation in bw dominated space is about white women and very negative.

No. 677597

>>677587
And what percentage of murderers and rapists are men again? or Pedos? They love to then claim that statistics don't matter or 'aren't accurate' when you mention those stats lol

Men commiting violence doesn't count as statistically worrying… but men receiving it does! When the person hurting them is also male we just ignore that part.

No. 677600

>>677596
I've frequented a lot of BW spaces and you're overreacting. At most, they'll make Karen jokes or discuss how lots of white women are complicit in racism in passing, but that's because, surprise, most of them actually have experiences being bullied by "Karens" at work, uni, HS, etc. Stats aren't going to reflect "Times women were passive-aggressive, rude and/or bitchy", kek.

No. 677603

>>677600
I agree with this. As someone who frequents LSA, it is common to see them debating about mixed-raced or LS people, but other than that most places for BW aren't like that. Plus, the race topics are divided into different alleys, so you can avoid it pretty easily.

No. 677604

>>677585
I stopped reading at that point. People feeling they have some sort of moral right to attack you tends to tends to cause me to lose interest. I've heard more than enough of bw complaints about ww. Entitlement and envy get tiring real quick.

No. 677605

>>677600
And what about Becky? Look have you ever been in a WW space where discussion turns to how much you'd desire to see BW wiped off the planet? or ww thrilled to learn a raped girl was black, literally phrased as "good! don't care, not my people". the callousness on LSA is pretty shocking.

They use white as a slur, they discuss endlessly how hideous ww are. You have clearly been in different threads than I have, bcos i am far from a sensitive and exaggerating this.

all i'm saying is the becky/karen tropes DO have a racial element, and some (not all) of it has sexual competition at its root.

like i said, a lot of ww are reeeally fucking naive about this.

No. 677607

>>677597
100%. It’s funny (not really) because most men who think like this are also gammon types that will say the higher crime rates against black men for example is okay because it’s often black on black crime. “Just let them get on with it”

But they don’t want to admit that they are also perpetrators when they are trying to play victim.

I’ve changed my mind - let them have a Minister for Men. I fully support it. Let them develop a wealth of research that proves men are responsible for the majority of their sexes problems lol.

No. 677609

>>677605
Nta, I've never seen that on lsa, but believe it or not though, there are white people out there that are like that. I'm not saying that it's right or that that excuses their behavior btw. But let's not act like there aren't a lot people who say that kind of stuff about black people (and non-white people in general).

No. 677612

>>677609
Yeah, you can find all types. I am asking you have you ever been in a white female space where something like that was discussed even once?
I'm going to drop it now, all I wanted to make clear is that, in my experience, white American women are pretty naive politically, you let everyone shove you around. It really pains me.

No. 677613

>>677605
>Look have you ever been in a WW space where discussion turns to how much you'd desire to see BW wiped off the planet?
That was literally this site, Lolcow, before we got a Latina admin who makes sure excessive /pol/ shit gets banned, lmao. There is/was still racism on /cgl/, too. The mod team got diversified and it's banned sometimes, but let's not act innocent.
>or ww thrilled to learn a raped girl was black, literally phrased as "good! don't care, not my people". the callousness on LSA is pretty shocking.
I've never seen anyone say "Good" to any girl getting raped on LSA, anon. More like a "Not my business" in a sea of sympathy posts. Also, how many "WW spaces" have you seen where they're all rallying to support a black girl who gets raped? There's indifference on both sides, and it's sad, but also a discussion for another day, not a "gotcha, they hate us" thing.
>all i'm saying is the becky/karen tropes DO have a racial element, and some (not all) of it has sexual competition at its root.
LSA almost universally hates black men because they're known abusers, very misogynistic, etc. It's weird to bring up "sexual competition", it's not like anyone actually wants black men.

No. 677614

>>677605
It isn't confined to LSA. Anywhere bw congregate you will find them bitching about ww. The new breed of pick mes this has created are intolerable. Even if you do avoid bw spaces you'll still encounter their pick mes spouting their bs and expecting praise for it.

No. 677617

>>677605
Discussing if black women shit talk white women or not is pointless because it all traces back to misogyny and plays right into this "(white) women am i right" discourse by dividing the demographic. Sexist men will hate women regardless of race, end of. The disdain black women have for white women is misguided hate and I can't really blame them, women across ethnicities are taught to police and hate each other to keep them from realizing that it's the men who are at the root of all their gender based problems. It's much easier to vent out your frustration on white women and demonize them as these uppity snooty Karens than go against the men of your community.

No. 677618

>>677612
I don't go on white female spaces so I wouldn't know.

No. 677619

>>677613
>That was literally this site
No, it really wasn't. Racebait has been around but to my recollection it's been muh wypipo venting and both black and white women being jealous over Asian girls than "I want to see black women wiped off the planet".

No. 677623

>>677619
Either you're very new, or the anon who said you're a LARPing scrote was right. This is just dishonest.
There were entire threads on /ot/ made solely to shit on black women, calling them apes, subhumans, "things", etc that would take days to be deleted. There are maybe 1-2 old bait threads still floating in the catalog.
Even posting black snowflakes/cow threads attracted that crowd a bit, we'd have racebaiters in Micky threads. It was pretty bad up until the site changed hands.

No. 677625

>>677623
I'd like to see some proof of this shit or I'm putting my money on a trip dropping admin with her "white karens making me slave away for free" complex.

No. 677627

Enough with the topic of race. These twitter threads always devolve into that shit. Stop posting your crybaby screenshots that are cherry picked from Twitter that you KNOW is going to kick up drama and infighting here.

No. 677629

>>677625
>proof of this shit
Of old, deleted racebait? I'd have to actually be a mod or admin to be able to do that.
If you're actually curious, try scrolling down in the /ot/ catalog. In fact, one example was posted in the last /meta/ complaints thread.

No. 677631

>>677629
NTA but I know exactly what you're talking about.

Don't spoonfeed this newfag.

No. 677664

>>677625
You're so embarrassing

No. 677737

File: 1605837931864.jpeg (755.36 KB, 1517x3464, D0D063E5-7E6E-4872-A954-746A37…)

It’s amazing how these men go up in arms about men’s mental health but lazily relate women’s suicidal behavior to being for attention, and therefore somehow not real suicide in their minds? It’s amazing how they scream that men don’t get hwlp fwom societyyy but trash all over women’s issues

No. 677742

>>677737
What the fuck even is this argument? They're saying women don't actually want to die so their attempts aren't actually attempts…just self harm for attention? What do they consider successful suicide attempts then? Accidents? The woman in this situation wasn't even trying to discredit male suicide occurrences/rates, but someone still called her an attention-seeker? Uh, ok?

No. 677772

>>677742
Didn't you know? Even wanting to kill yourself is a gendered competition.

No. 677894

File: 1605867835475.jpeg (44.08 KB, 320x240, 35B7C592-B472-4CC8-B084-3540A8…)

>>677742
Men are insane. Literally trying to act like words don’t mean their dictionary definitions if women are concerned.

No. 677899

File: 1605870281473.png (225.53 KB, 542x902, uhhhhhh.png)

every day this website gets worse and worse. this person is probably really young too

No. 677903

>>677899
>boys LITERALLY CANNOT abstain themselves from sexually harassing women! They have no choice but to degrade and dehumanize women showing any skin!

No. 677915

>>677737
Disgusting. They conveniently ignore the fact that most gun owners in the US for example (which the stats are usually based on) are men, and that's usually their chosen method of suicide. Women can't just grab a gun and end it because they rarely own one, so they go for the pills because that's what they have at their disposal when a spontaneous depressive and suicidal episode hits. Of course shooting yourself in the head with a shotgun is going to kill you at a much higher probability than pills. The end goal for both of them is to get rid of the pain and end it all, not to ~look for attention~. The only reason why men have higher suicide statistics is guns, women top them in attempted suicide statistics. If pills were as deadly the stats would look quite different.

No. 677928

>>677737
I don't even take this shit seriously anymore. If a man says this around me, I just want to reply with "Yeah, if I were a man, I'd kill myself, too. As painfully as possible".
I'm convinced women's suicide methods are cleaner (and thus less definite/more likely to fail) because they're not interested in leaving a mess or traumatizing people for no reason. They try to find tidy ways to do it.
Men are selfish, so they don't care and will blow their heads off, jump in front of trains and inconvenience people, etc. Someone has to deal with it, but it's all about themselves, so it doesn't matter. Some of them even kill their own families, including their children, out of selfishness.

No. 677929

>>677899
>they can't stop
ah yes, the two conflicting dichotomies of misogyny
>Men are the sex of rational thinking, logic and order, while women are irrational and hormonal and can't control their emotions like men do
but also
>Men literally can't control their hormonal and emotional instincts, it's up to women to be constantly defending themselves from men because they are just fundamentally unable to not think with their dicks

No. 677956

>>677899
God, the zoomers growing up on twitter are all going to be so fucked in the head. The ones who aren't already, that is.

No. 678031

>>677899
She's not even showing a ton of skin. It's strange how these kids have such a Victorian-era mindset. It's the same with some of those redesign artists too.

No. 678090

File: 1605891862051.png (837.52 KB, 1242x2208, 66451C50-AD91-4E5D-80D0-2574DC…)

Yes, because BLM and other activists really give a shit if a white person uses black hairstyles in Animal Crossing instead of worrying about other pressing issues.

No. 678094

>>678090
Lmao the last reply, love to see it

No. 678100

>>678090
>>678094
I bet that bitches not using those pOc HaIrStYlEs would also be a reason to bitch about upholding white beauty standards.

No. 678102

>>678090
>>678094
“i am so so sorry” kek shut your mouth and you won’t have to bend over to appease like that

No. 678106

>>678090
Bitch wtf are cornbraids. I wish people who don't actually understand black culture would stop saying shit like this. If you have to google what cornrows are you should not be the person making this tweet in the first place.

No. 678118

>>678100
Sorry but that wouldn't happen. Not every ridiculous expectation has an equivalency in the reverse.

No. 678131

>>678100
I mean if you have to make up hypotheticals get upset about.. then you're reaching. Get upset about the facts of what they have done, not the next step that your imagination stretches it to.

No. 678135

File: 1605894951697.png (101.65 KB, 500x373, 7F7DE3A5-9972-488B-9474-AF081B…)

>>678090
You already know that poster just doesn't like some girl and needed a #woke way to subtweet her, lmao.

No. 678146

>>678090
good lord i wish animal crossing never went mainstream, now the fandom is chock full of these low IQ zoomer discoursers

No. 678180

>>678090
Whats wrong with making your animal crossing character look different from how you look irl? Who cares if someone with straight hair picks the cornrow style. Its a fucking game, I dont have blue hair irl but my character does, these idiots make us look like butthurt retards

No. 678181

>>678090
blm activists exclusively have time to drag ppl for using the 'wrong' hairstyles in video games

No. 678192

>>678090
I'm fucking dying lmfao maybe I should get a twitter

No. 678215

>>677899
>3.2k quote retweets
Oh you know they're tearing that retard apart.

No. 678216

>>678215
Oh shit, good catch anon. I didn't notice the massive ratio before but I bet the replies are delicious

No. 678241

>>649527
Any suggestions on who / which communities to follow if you just want to see idiotic discourse and cows to post here?

No. 678243

File: 1605906919783.png (Spoiler Image, 302.02 KB, 804x588, skhbvsj1.png)

>>677899
95/100 chance she's an insecure, possibly unattractive girl mad that more conventionally attractive girls get engagement for dressing cute.
This is the shit NLOGs post when they feel in their bones that nobody wants to see them dressed like that, lmao.
Pretending they're more proper while publicly posting/RTing sexual content about 2D husbandos.

No. 678551

File: 1605950661304.png (168.42 KB, 1080x766, Screenshot_20201119-114028~2.p…)

I can't stand how smug these people are, you know they are the same ones at the beginning of the crisis who went "it's just the flu calm down". I'm all for social distancing and wearing masks because I'm as sick of the situation as everybody else, but to me this is just a condescending lack of empathy, especially towards people who lost everything because the economy is in shambles. We've been inundated by corona news 24/7 for close to a year now, just let people daydream a bit.

No. 678559

>>678551
I actually agree with the sentiment lol but also agree it’s so nitpicky, it’s like if someone describes their morning routine as “the first thing I do after waking up is make coffee”. You wouldn’t correct them with “no, you actually open your eyes, get out of bed, move to the kitchen, blah blah”. Of course everyone is supposed to follow the guidelines and most people are fantasising about AFTER that.

The stupid shit that people put out for twitter likes, it’s so fucking formulaic.

No. 678564

>>678243
good god why did i unspoiler this
why is it always fujos with the retard-tier misogynistic takes
>>678551
i don't even get the point of these tweets? there's already enough animosity around the vaccine, no need to create more and risk people not getting it.

No. 678574

>>678551
Some people are really getting off on playing the responsible parent or whatever on the internet, as if without passive aggressive posts like that, everyone will forget to wear masks and socially distance.

No. 679147

File: 1606025542123.png (32.29 KB, 751x342, Capture.PNG)

I thought it was impossible to be this retarded but clearly I was wrong

No. 679153

File: 1606026906022.jpeg (338.85 KB, 750x838, C20363B6-65E8-4646-99CF-6FC9E0…)

on the topic of sia's autism sperging while I do think what she did was retarded, these people are even more embarrassing than sia herself. they're sperging about how they think vaccines are eugenics and calling themselves disabled when they're asswipe aspies at worst, mentalfags on twitter are so embarrassing

"âuties"
please fucking nuke all autists please just do it

No. 679155

>>679147
This is probably derailing, but I do think the nuclear family is kind of bad. It's probably the reason why the US has 50% divorce rates compared to other Western nations, because a family is more than just the parents and children.

This is probably a dumb opinion, I know. I really shouldn't make a post I know will solicit a lot of unrelated discussion, but I can't help myself. I need the serotonin from voicing my opinion to random strangers who won't benefit, because I'm addicted to getting off on it. Oh, wait, isn't that what Twitter is, essentially?

No. 679199

>>679153
I had to look up what this was even about. Why would anyone call in a nonverbal autist to play a role? At the end of the day, the actor needs to communicate with the staff and can't be going around throwing tantrums. Also I assume Maddie was casted for her dancing ability and longstanding relationship with Sia, how could you pretend any random autist will work just as well with the director?
That said, I'm not interested in watching it, so whatever.

No. 679209

>>679199
I also had to google the fuss and ugh, having an autistic actor in a high-stress film production sounds like it would be very bad situation for all parties involved. Or if they did cave into the criticism, it would be like the teacher giving a kid the pity-role of “tree” in the school play. And, there would probably be backlash of “how dare they force an autistic actor to put up with all this stimuli”

No. 679217

>>679147
Op is right

No. 679239

>>679155
Children of single parent households are more likely to experience poverty. I know scrotes are useless so I don't advocate having kids for the sake of having kids. But it's best if children have 2 healthy functioning parents.

No. 679254

>>679239
the point isn't that it's bad for kids to have 2 parents or that it's bad to have families.

the point is that the nuclear family model often separates people from others, kids having only two adults they can depend on makes abuse easier, 2 parents get tired when they have no one else to help them, elderly get put alone into nursing homes because family is just the parents and the kids. nuclear family is bad because family can be bigger than that, western humans are alienating themselves from relatives and other people.

No. 679280

>>679254
Elderly get put into nursing homes because they live too fucking long now, and pretty much only at the mercy of prescriptions.
If our elderly all died at 70, and that was that it would be different.

No. 679287

>>679280
You love to post bait, don't you.

No. 679290

>>679287
What would be the purpose of baiting you regarding the obligations of caring for the aging population again?

No. 679291

>>679287
NTAYRT but I don't see that as bait. I agree with them - we've extended human life without extending the quality of that life. Our bodies, and more importantly our brains, aren't designed to live for 70, 80, 90+ years. I'm not suggesting a mass culling of the elderly, just that pouring so much of our medical funding into that age range is doing nothing for our society in the long run.

No. 679293

>>679290
What's not bait in saying that old people should hurry up and die earlier?

No. 679299

>>679293
D for reading comprehension, but I'll bite because I'm stupid and bored.
>What's not bait in saying that old people should hurry up and die earlier?
They don't have to die earlier. However, I refuse to feel obligated to care for the elderly in my home when they're living as long as they are and in absolutely awful condition. If you want to ruin your marriage and be miserable cleaning up your incontinent father-in-law's shit, and micromanaging your elders like extremely dangerous oversized toddlers, enjoy.

No. 679306

>>679291
Midsommar had the right idea tbh

No. 679315

>>679280
I totally agree, there are just very few people who can still function normally at the age of 80-90 but I feel like the majority is not and modern medicine is just unnecessarily prolonging things; I guess there's probably no real data on it but just looking at the elderly people of my or my boyfriend's family; his grandma is filthy rich, living in the best ever elderly care home in the country and for few years already just complaining about wanting to finally die in peace. I can imagine how much worse it has to be for the elderly who don't have the luxuries she does. I really don't get why can't we make euthanasia legal, it doesn't have to be free for all easy access but just let it happen to these who want to pass peacefully with dignity.

No. 679318

>>679299
It's "either die or let them rot" so them dying is preferable to you. Kill yourself.

No. 679325

>>679318
Well, yes. I will put myself first, since I haven't lived a full life yet and don'tfeel like sacrificing it so that someone else can be a strain. You have an extremely skewed concept of what letting someone rot is, when I'm talking about putting elderly people in professional, qualified care instead of dealing with their literal shit in my home.

No. 679338

>>679147
They’re absolutely right.

No. 679381

I absolutely hate how the tech twitter is full of trannies hijacking the whole discourse. They're forcing the narrative that instead of women the most vulnerable demographic in need of dire protection and attention in tech is none other than trans women, always co-opting the narrative from talking about the discrimination against women to sperging about tranny issues. I'm sorry Lily my ma'am, but the reason you're not employed is that you're an insufferable incel piece of shit who's garbage at both programming and team work. I'm so fucking DONE. And the cis handmaidens simping for them are never programmers themselves, they're always "community managers" or some stupid middle management position that never has to deal with the fallout of pandering to troons. I'm so fucking glad I never come across these types in my real life career but online they seem to be everywhere.

No. 679437

File: 1606066611034.png (28.76 KB, 597x286, gagmewithaspoon.PNG)

Yeah, fuck anyone who wants the person they married to be happy or treats them like a human being capable of making decisions, am I right?

No. 679442

>>679437
What’s up with all the pick-mes on Twitter?

No. 679445

File: 1606067261700.png (837.46 KB, 900x680, sick-stimpy.png)


No. 679447

>>679445
(also of course americans also think that people become immobile seniles at the age of 70 because of your shit life habits)

No. 679449

>>679437
What kind of social problems is she even talking about

No. 679469

>>679437
>>679442
I really think these women spend too much time online or around male spaces. They act like everything is black and white and that men and women are completely equal and there is no nuance to anything. Any phrase like "happy wife happy life" is sexist, if a woman tweets "men are trash," it's literal hate speech against men.

No. 679484

>>679299
> However, I refuse to feel obligated to care for the elderly in my home when they're living as long as they are and in absolutely awful condition.
I agree and I have a hard time seeing why someone would think it's okay to be obligated to do this. I never asked to be born and considering how most parents aren't really great, it would be a lot to ask from their progeniture to make such sacrifices.
But at the cost of being called a femcel, I hate that such duties and tasks are often delegated without question to the women in the family.
And personally, I'd rather be given euthanasia if I had to rely on someone else to do the basic things like defecating and walking and whatnot. Why would anyone want to live such life anyway?

No. 679495

>>679442
can't even go on twitter for one second without seeing some pickme begging for attention from some group. it's either
>ohhh god king please let me in your harem i'm not like these other girls
or
>please please colored person please tell me i'm a good ally
bonus if she has pronouns in her bio

No. 679581

File: 1606084671758.jpeg (104.42 KB, 640x360, 3750322B-C9A1-4332-ADF0-F467E8…)

I used to think people making a big deal about men making shit up to infiltrate women's spaces was fake, but holy shit now 6'6" neck beards are identifying as "non-binary" for the ability to whine and police how other people refer to them. This site is a fucking nuclear waste dump at this point.

No. 679593

File: 1606086968631.jpg (Spoiler Image, 33.42 KB, 1024x698, EnVMuUgXIAArZce.jpg)


No. 679595

>>679593
Lmao anon, this has to be fake.

No. 679601

>>679595
But, anon, water is scawy!

No. 679638

File: 1606092525770.png (49.48 KB, 592x663, lmaooo.PNG)

All this over a video game

No. 679640

File: 1606092749328.jpg (Spoiler Image, 112.56 KB, 836x1023, EmTjBkGXcAEQDpu.jpg)

>>679595
it's most likely bait, my friend sent it to me- I just wanted to post it on this thread. But here's one that's most likely not bait.

No. 679652

>>679638
lesson: no matter what you do to be inclusive, woke crowd will shit all over you.
Mass Effect Andromeda devs had to apologize and rewrite their transgender character (extra forgettable NPC) because woke crowd didnt think the dialogue carried a "good enough, realistic portrayal"
or recent gender neutral addition to COD is super problematic because having the gender "classified" and your character go with they/them somehow implies that there's "something wrong" with being not CIS

give me a break

No. 679656

File: 1606095832086.jpg (153.89 KB, 719x1280, tumblr_d98ff9dcbc2d012c8891b3e…)

>>679640
tbh cottagecore does have a bit of an issue with tradwife neonazis getting into it, amassing a ton of followers, and only then disclosing their beliefs, happens almost every week on tumblr.
>Picrel Fairmaidnelly with her horrendous shoops and uber christian fundie spergs is one of the milkiest ones.

No. 679662

>>679656
That's a shit ton of cleavage for someone to be so spergy about Christianity.
I would really like to see those people exposed for what they are, because there's no way that you're being respected by the men in those communities, or shit-even other women within your shitty church when you're dressing like that.
>when cottagecore goes hardcore

When are we going to end up coming across a webm with her fucking a tin of off-brand canned biscuits?

No. 679716

>>679209
Tell that to Anthony Hopkins. I don’t think that people lower on the spectrum should be expected to reprise roles , however there are high functioning autistic actors that do just fine. That being said, it’s a non issue if the actor playing someone autistic is autistic or not, as long as they do their research for the portrayal as to not offend, it should be fine.

No. 679727

>>679638
What are the chances these people are even going to play the game why claim ownership over something you have no general interest in other then your 'wokeness'

No. 679765

>>679716
I think the issue is that they seemed to want to have a non verbal austic person in the role. However, if the autism is so severe that they're non verbal, they probably aren't going to be able to follow directions as needed.
I do think that high functioning autistic people can probably act just fine, but then they would probably be high functioning enough that people would still get pissed about it.
I'll probably piss people off, but I think that Aspergers and Autism need to be separated. While they're similar, there is a huge difference in how much a person can function and I think a lot of people with Aspergers now think that their experience applies to all autistic people.
Source: I have Aspergers, and I've also worked extensively with autistic children. There is very much a difference.

No. 679769

>>679765
the problem is that nowadays people are saying it's "ableist" to separate severe autism from high functioning autism. the thing is there's a clear difference between the two. someone who's a slightly different brained aspie isn't going to be on the same level of mental retardation, nowhere near, as a severely disabled autist with the mental capacity of a four year old. and now it's not even considered to call aspies aspies, and then people are saying it's ableist to use "high functioning" or "low functioning" as labels. also fucking sick of seeing clearly high functioning asswipes calling themselves "disabled" mentally when their mental handicaps are nowhere near befitting actual "disability". you certainly don't see the same spergery that surrounds the current autism discourse amongst bpdfags since bpdfagging isn't hip anymore. I wish these idiots would realize it isn't hip or cool or empowering to call oneself "disabled", but whatever, I'm probably too old to understand modern spergery, to me this is like the autism version of the shit I saw on tumblr as a young bpdfag. the fact that mental illness is trendy and that they're saying it's ableist to use medical terminology to describe it or ever distinguish the types or do anything but collectivize the disorder as one thing only is gross. for autism and various other disorders it's a spectrum, and for some it's a sliding scale of functionality, there's nothing wrong with using the terms "low" or "high" functioning, it's way less offensive than "special needs", "disabled", or "handicapped"

No. 679772

>>679638
based cdpr, achieving all this shit in one swoop

No. 679782

>>679769
This has been mentioned before but I absolutely hate the "activists" who screech about the "ableist" distinction between high and low functioning autists. What their discourse is saying basically is that autists are only allowed to be uwu smol bean savants uwu but those icky low functioning beasts just have a "comorbid leaning disability" that causes them to be incapable of speech and self control, it's not the autism that makes them be like they are. It's some fucked up form of gate keeping.

No. 679792

File: 1606120580479.png (346.61 KB, 974x441, aaaaaaa.png)

Astounded that these people even know how to read

No. 679812

>>679792
The more I see shit like this the more I'm starting to believe that "good times create weak men" image that circulates 4c/8c

No. 679825

>>679792
This makes me want to write even more of that dark shit with miserable endings than before.Thanks for the inspo!

No. 679846

>>679656
Wow, this is a type of cow I didn't even know I needed

>>679662
>fucking a tin of off-brand canned biscuits
Anon please spare me, I am slain

No. 679858

>>679638
don't care didn't ask still buying the game because i've been waiting for it for 7(looking like 8 by the rate it's going) years now
also troon opinions are irrelevant
>>679792
you could sneeze at these people and they'd fall apart. how do they even live?

No. 679879

>>679812
Sounds plausible. I myself just keep thinking about that rat society behavioral sink experiment.

However I feel like these people don't actually get panic attacks or anxiety over book endings or shit, they're just looking for any crumbs of attention by being overdramatic to seem like poor widdle babies.

No. 679883

>>679879
not related but you reminded me of that time during a blm protest a girl was having a panic attack for being arrested for the first time in the most gentle way possible. Her friends were yelling at the cop telling him to unarrest her because she was going through a panic attack. Ironically she had a "be gay do crime" shirt on her.
it was not a riot protest, but your local protest of just holding up signs- also I don't know why I mentioned it I'm sorry

No. 679887

>>679792
These people haven't read anything past the mandatory classic books in hs, have they? These are probably the same people that whine that there aren't happy gay stories when there's an extensive gay litterature written by and for gay people.

No. 679892

>>679887
From what I remember I've read at school (from primary school to hs) as many books with happy endings as books with bad or bittersweet endings, maybe it depends on each country, region and year's program but there was a lot of variety. I bet they only read YA books.

No. 679901

>>679892
I think they want uwu coffee shops AU type of stories where there's minimal to zero conflict and everybody is always happy. Like for example, while the endings of Harry Potter or LotR are happy, there was still a lot of suffering and dead people to get there, I think it's a big no-no for them.

No. 679921

>>679892
> I bet they only read YA books.
Probably. The only genre that’ll pander to this shit aside from children’s fiction.

>>679792
> “Life has enough gritty realism on its own”
By this logic, life also has enough happy sappy shit so fuck writing books altogether.

Surely half the point of tragedy in books is to reflect life? Unless you lock yourself in a room and never interact with anyone ever, negative things will happen. People you love will die. You’ll go through break ups. Friends will hurt you. You or someone close will likely become seriously ill. And even if you experience all that, that’s an average life, not a trauma narrative. How sensitive do you have to be to shield yourself from fictional depictions of average, expected life events?

I don’t read misery lit as a rule but this utopian shit sounds boring and unrelatable as fuck. There’s fiction, then there’s utter delusion.

No. 679931

>>679901
Nothing wrong with wanting to read fluffy cutesy books but wanting everyone to be forced to see spoilers for books they're reading because you're too stupid to look into what you want to read is just silly. And having variety is good. I just can't even be angry at these people on twitter anymore, I'm just laughing at them.

No. 679952

>>679792
This confuses me so much, I've yet to read a YA or Fantasy series that doesn't have an at least somewhat happy end. And let's be honest, it's not like these people are going to read anything else.

No. 679985

>>679437

I went to college with this girl. She's switched ideologies like 6 times now and trad thot is the latest one.

No. 680905

File: 1606244621026.jpg (46.3 KB, 598x509, dislike.JPG)

>Twitter is currently "exploring" adding a dislike button or some kind of downvoting system, presumably à la Reddit, announced the company's product lead on Tuesday. The potential change, confirmed Twitter, is part of a larger effort to make Twitter a place amenable to more nuanced conversations.

>Unfortunately, we weren't able pin Twitter down on when you might actually get a dislike button (or even if you will definitely get one). But it's noteworthy that Twitter is exploring such a button at all.


https://mashable.com/article/twitter-explores-dislike-button-downvote-system/?europe=true&utm_campaign=mash-com-tw-main-link&utm_content=tech&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=social

No. 680958

>>680905
As if twitter wasn't already a shitshow.

No. 680967

>>680905
I can already feel the suicide baiting of randos when they get mad after a few dislikes.

No. 680971

>>680905
Good. Let it all burn to the ground. All of it.

No. 680975

>>680905
if they want nuance why not allow for different reaction options?

No. 680979

>>680905
I would hate this, seeing people get ratio'd for retarded takes is infintely more entertaining

No. 681012

File: 1606256681838.jpg (77.02 KB, 1080x549, Screenshot_20201124-142252.jpg)

The replies to this are abysmal

No. 681024

>>681012
I'm gonna take a wild guess and say it's filled with bitter scrotes

No. 681135

File: 1606271840204.jpg (80.37 KB, 749x1015, 20201125_093526.jpg)

The reaply in this tweet make me lost hope of hummanity and I realize learning another culture and value is important

No. 681136

>>681012
I still am not used to the phrases "bodies" and "body count", it's so creepy. their meaning doesn't help much, it still is a weird way to call it, like that's all they were. I guess /sage for ot?

No. 681148

>>681136
I feel the same way, it's gross and makes you sound like a serial killer.

No. 681249

File: 1606289150700.jpg (29.26 KB, 523x339, dajlkdfjlknvlx.jpg)

>>681135
Holy shit this is so funny. Good thing most people are sane and on her side kek

No. 681372

>>681249
I wonder what type of people would have been considered the equivalent to these twitterfags 50 years ago… humanity has always been fucked but getting mad over a hairstyle in a nintendo game is just…no words

No. 681374

>>681372
no one because even just 20 years ago these people were lone idiots having their dumb beliefs shut down by their more sane friends, instead of validation from people online.

No. 681376

>>681136
At first I thought it meant some kind of "I have multiple personalities" bullshit, not lays. You never know on twitter.

No. 681379

>>681372
Maybe the kind of people who sent really weird letters to TV / radio shows that Monty Python always parodied? That's just a guess though

No. 681401

>>681135
NTA but that puppy decor is so cute.

No. 681430

>>681012
>>681135
>the replies
It would be fun to be able to see them, you didn't link tho

No. 681449

File: 1606316957773.png (97.73 KB, 1334x750, 41rnqk8it6ay.png)

>>681372
There has always been crazies but they mostly kept it to themselves by writing in their diaries or some shit. The internet has given a way for all people to transmit and amplify their thoughts so they feel they are allowed to say whatever they want.

No. 681453

File: 1606318280454.png (214.3 KB, 652x736, wtf.png)

>>681249
woke twitterfags are genuinely psychotic

No. 681458

File: 1606318824557.png (299.79 KB, 1246x514, kys.png)

>>681453
5 trillion hours in ms paint but i just want to give you guys an idea of who's getting mad about space buns
it's people who refer to their age as "levels"

No. 681461

>>681453
That fucking sucks so much, I’m so sorry for this girl. What the hell is wrong with those twitties retards? What’s next? Will they do a huge protest with a mass suicide stunt to make the girl change her fucking animal crossing character’s hairstyle?

No. 681462

File: 1606319297063.jpg (23.2 KB, 852x480, spy.jpg)

>>681458
yep, that's a fakeboi

No. 681465

>>681458
wait how does that make any sense a white person could just say they were black in the questionnaire

No. 681469

>>681465
Obviously, the next level is that Nintendo requires a photo of your hand to verify your skin color, like the black subreddits do.

No. 681471

>>681458
Oh yeah, a white savior helping us dumb brownies because we can’t defend our shit ourselves/s

No. 681477

File: 1606320757103.jpg (139.99 KB, 600x1018, just collect seaweed.jpg)

>>681379
Or the idiots who write into newspapers

No. 681481

>>681249
i don't get it are people really that mad over a hairstyle? i was expecting to find some genuinely racist stuff on her twitter by the way people are acting holy shit

No. 681593

>>681249
>harassing someone over a hairstyle in animal crossing
Typical

No. 683438

File: 1606582539015.jpeg (309.95 KB, 750x1032, 569F30CB-8192-4008-A268-656287…)

I never thought I'd run across retards who think the tag making fun of Trump was ableist but I guess everything is ableist now

No. 683441

>>683438
boohoo they shit their pants, trump shits his pants too. Looks like Trump is more relatable to them then they initially thought.

Twitter is so toxic I couldn't even have it for less than a year. I was so annoyed, these retarded ass tweets is the main example why I had to leave.

No. 683448

>>683438
When my periods are really intense I sleep in those diapers that're made for post-menopausal women with bladder weakness, I laugh at myself in them. My ex used to laugh at me, oh no lol

No. 683497

>>683438
This sounds like a joke from South Park.

No. 683544

>>683438
I hate that this icon got so popular because every time I see some retarded take next to it on twitter I have to double take cause I think it's Cristina Vee at first and get confused

No. 683586

>>683448
Menstronormies won't get the satisfaction of giving up when it's too heavy to cap and just donning the diaper of shame.
It's not like it's being used for pee or poop, so it's far less disgusting. Things just hit a point where you're too miserable to worry about staining and want to sleep comfortably damnit

No. 683894

>>683544
>Christina Vee
I mean, she says some equally retarded shit too. Then again, what voice actor isn't a fucking cow these days?

No. 683930

File: 1606644949176.png (98.88 KB, 400x418, 58E51A33-C9C9-4EAB-80B1-B632CF…)

Please someone delete twitter. I don’t wanna have to see another hot takeTM ever again in my life.

No. 683934

>>683930
You can't just change what words mean when you feel like it, Jake

No. 683938

>>683930
…Then what is it? Creating newspeak and policing terms with no natural evolution but a forced narrative is literal dystopian tier shit. I heard about people saying that the term lesbian will soon be considered a "terf dogwhistle" but I didn't realize it would actually come to that.

No. 683940

>>683930
ok "nasty omega vagina fingers"

No. 683944

>>683938
These people have absolutely no power as long as you don’t go on the internet. Especially if you don’t have mainstream social media. They are fucking spineless and they will never put themselves at any sort of risk.

No. 683949

>>683930
>queer history
Opinion completely discarded. Also calling anything you disagree with terf theory is so easy, you don't need to think of an argument to refute your opponent, you call them a nasty bigot and you can get away with anything.

No. 684023

>>683930
>kpop icon
Never even once.

No. 684828

File: 1606761134488.png (408.48 KB, 720x870, what.png)

I love when they fight each other

No. 684829

>>684828
i dont get why hating white woman is a meme like that. it makes no fucking sense, replace it with brown, black, indian ect. and its racist. is saying that just a cool way to be misogynistic?

No. 684834

>>684829
Yes, anon. I mean, there are points about white women and their privilege/speaking over other women to be made, but ultimately, it's divisive and unhelpful.

No. 684840

>>684828
Any woman who 'cancels' an entire group of women based on their skincolor is fucking stupid. Women are playing against each other and men are laughing at the sidelines. This is literal regression.

No. 684842

>>684828
I'm not white but I hate this shit so much, like yeah, there can be criticisms about white women handwaving racism etc, but it's so transparent that women-haters have just found a little way to hate on women as much as they want without repurcussions by making the woman they are targeting white. All the while the libfems, and other wokesters are on board with blatant misogyny. Didn' you know 80% of all crimes are committed by karens? It's disgusting.

No. 684843

>>684829
Don't know, but if we're too busy shitting on each other for lived differences then we're fucking doomed. Everyone wants to be heard, everyone wants to feel valid. I don't want to get too into it, but I can see where she's coming from. I can even relate, but more in the sense that working class women in general are kind of ignored outside of SW. Slightly OT, but I wonder if SW are only praised so much to make excuses for the people doing OnlyFans, because actual sex workers are still living in squalor with a boatload of problems and a shit support system.

No. 684846

>>684840
I'm still in awe at how the sjw crowd managed to turn progressiveness into 'hating women is cool, actually'

No. 684851

File: 1606763310237.jpeg (194.46 KB, 828x1041, F94A61F6-2373-482C-9B6A-47E639…)

>>684828
Men of all colors use the opportunity to spew their misogyny once “white” or “cis” is in front of it. We women must come together. Men will not support us.

No. 684859

>>684840
>>684829
Lmao White women throwing shit fits about having to be held accountable for their racism and scapegoating it as misogyny. This is the exact thing those tweets were talking about

No. 684862

>>684859
Friendly reminder that these people using the "white" prefix with their misogyny still don't give a shit about women no matter what race they are.

No. 684863

Not to rain on anyones parade, but didn't you guys have this exact same conversation a couple days ago

No. 684868

>>684863
That's just how the twitter thread is anon

No. 684871

>>684864
Nta but no one cares about the opinion of trannies here, at least. U right about everything else kek.

No. 684875

>>684873
Nta, and this is true, but I see mostly women of color shitting on white, especially straight white women, moreso than white/other men. What do we do with that?

No. 684876

>>684859
This is why no one likes you guys

No. 684880

>>684875
Visit any radfem community and see how judgemental white women are of everyone who's not them.

No. 684883

>>684828
If white women don't care about woke stuff, they're all racist Karen wine moms. If they do care and support it they're accused of appropriating the woke movement to be all about them.

No. 684885

>>684828
How's one supposed to interpret this tweet? Will you just genocide white women or what?
> y'all gotta go
go where?

No. 684888

>>684885
Stop taking everything so literally anon. This is dramatic.

No. 684889

>>684887
I'm just asking.
> Gotta go.
What does that mean? Completely vanish from the social media, reduce births of white women. What?
Because when you make statements like that, you obviously have a certain thing in mind. Don't brush it off as lol it was just a joke.

No. 684893

>>684889
To add, I don't feel threatened. I'm merely curious about what that's even supposed to mean.

No. 684897

>>684889
Idk if this is just an English language thing, but "you gotta go" isn't meant to be taken literally. When you say "you gotta go" it's not supposed to mean killing someone. It's hard to explain to someone that doesn't understand it, but it's basically like "you gotta stop". Like, if someone says something crazy you might be like "Oh nah, you gotta go". It's just slang. I think it's kind of weird to jump to the conclusion of "poc want to genocide white women".

No. 684898

>>684896
Okay, thanks for clarifying. So stop doing what then?

No. 684900

>>684880
I wasn't saying that accusatorily against women of color, for the record. It's more of an observation about how the woke crowd, including other women, have been memed into hating white women as much as, if not more than white and all other men. I don't think it's helpful. However,
>Visit any radfem community and see how judgemental white women are of everyone who's not them.
wtf does this even mean? This is peak retardation kek, radfems recognize that dividing the struggles of women by race weakens shit and leaves men laughing at us all and is what allows the wokey men to throw white ~Karen~ women under the bus.

No. 684903

>>684898
Speaking probably.

No. 684909

>>684898
Sorry for deleting the post but, idk, whatever op wants them to stop doing. It depends on the context. Based off of op's tweet, she just means she wants white women (and white people in general) to stop trying to speak for poc with racism. For example, that animal crossing afro puff thing. I'm not offended by it, and I've yet to see any other black people say they think it's racist. Literally most of us think it's just a game Or for white feminists who only focus on the issues that white women go through.

Tbh that original tweet was not as offensive as anons are making it out to be. If you get it, you get it. I think you guys just saw that it said "white women!" and got mad.

No. 684919

>>684909
>If you get it you get it
Exactly. I'm not sure why anons freak out so much when they see "white women" or think it's a huge meme, there's validity to those criticism. However, there's also the point to be made about dividing women's struggles by race, experience, etc. Like, seriously, we've been fighting about the original tweet and that woman's reply when
>>684851
Was also posted which is just disgusting and misogynistic to the core.

No. 684926

>>684919
I think anons freaked out because it's just a bit stupid to be divisive, starting with the white girl who tried to get points because she's not straight

No. 684929

>>684880
I… what? Most radfems on the internet are black.

No. 684973

>>684929
What? Do you visit any website besides Twitter and LSA? This is wildly inaccurate wtf

No. 684986

>>684973
Nta, but to be fair, Twitter is huge even if LSA isn't. And ime, a lot of black women, especially older black women, are radfem/radfemmy, even if they don't identify as such or realize it. Black women are often very pro women and don't really give into troonery. In fact, a lot of older women of color are. Plenty of matriarchal households/societies even where machismo runs rampant.

No. 684999

>>684973
I wouldn’t say most American radfems are black, because black people make up like 10% of the US population, but radfem spaces do seem disproportionately populated by black women, so I think it’s pretty safe to say it appeals to them more than it does a lot of white women. It’s actually pretty refreshing.

No. 685007

>>684973
Tbh the ones I've met have been all kinds of people.

No. 685022

>>684973
it's true anon, many black women turn to radical feminism due to black men being absolute trash partners
and white radfems, especially ones from europe, tend to come from less privileged countries. Just look at what's happening in poland and tell me white women there have easy no struggle lives and should "go" as that tweet says.

No. 685080

uli vitun uli. retard ientity politics gonna be retarded.

No. 685205

File: 1606793697085.jpg (104.73 KB, 537x2048, 20201201_103429.jpg)


No. 685209

>>685205
Oh my god?? I love the entitlement of Twitterfags

No. 685211

>>684900
You really think they do? Pay attention to how they act when they're not speaking out of their ads.

No. 685224

>>685022
>Just look at what's happening in poland and tell me white women there have easy no struggle lives
Do simps still fight for places in line when they line up to give them free stuff for having a uterus?

No. 685240

>>685205
Kek thank you for these
If everyone arguing in the thread would instead just look at these messages instead, we could have peace on earth

No. 685244

>>685205
Dumbass furry asks another dumbass furry to not be degenerate. I can’t. Get these people off the internet, but not really because this is hilarious.

No. 685256

>>683586
whats funniest about the OP of the diaper post is that it's a scrote and a scrote can't even fathom the idea of having to bleed every month. wearing inconsistence diapers a couple of times isn't shit when you have to wear pads or tampons and bleed from your vagina every month, scrotes have it easy

No. 685685

File: 1606854230592.png (652.38 KB, 1242x2208, 09BBD368-CA87-47DE-AE6E-13AAF0…)

Not the dumbest thing I read on this stupid app but still pretty stupid. And lol that they disabled replies.

No. 685737

>>685685
They don’t bat an eyelid whenever a cis person is cast to play a trans person because it’s a rarity and most people just don’t give a shit. A man in a dress is a man in a dress regardless of what he identifies as, that’s the way the majority of people think so why would they care who’s cast?

Anyway are they defending cis people playing trans characters on purpose? Because that’s what it reads like but I’m going to assume they are too stupid to realise this.

No. 685768

>>685685
I've been batting my eye since I watched the first episode of that show, because Vanya is a male name. Of course now it's going to be 5000% IQ foreshadowing.

No. 685883

>>685224
What the fuck are you on? You type like a scrote. Anyway I never met a racist radfem, it's the genderctiticals non feminists that are.

No. 685939

i have lost my friend to twitter. all she cares about is raging at other ppl about discourse. it's so pointless and it's made her such a bitter, angry person.

No. 685946

>>685939
bc all my free time in quarantine i feel myself doing the same. twitter folk are just so stupid its hard to hold my tongue

No. 685952

>>685946
i guess i don't understand surrounding yourself with negativity. you can choose to look at things that don't piss you off. people notice when you've become cynical and unfun to be around

No. 685961

>>685939

I know what you mean, my sister has become obsessed with twitter recently and she uses the same lingo and cringey words they use all the time, like "problematic" even if she always used to make fun of it before. The worst thing is she is honestly way too old to be doing shit like this and she still acts like one of those stan accounts for Hollywood actors and talking about the latest "discourse" and how much she loves bootlicking trannies. It's just sad and embarrassing.

No. 688103

File: 1607190154142.png (586.2 KB, 2048x1147, 8h2fs2wqjc361.png)

Normie tweets that go viral are annoying

No. 688105

>>688103
worst part is that this tweet goes viral every two months in different accounts, they always repeat themselves

No. 688149

File: 1607195807452.jpg (207.95 KB, 1080x1121, Screenshot_20201205_190524.jpg)

TRAs on twitter are insufferable, this is a response on Tom Feltons (Draco Actor) recent tweet that had nothing to do with anything trans related. He didn't say anythingtransphobic, he didn't say anything, they're just dragging him into a situation that doesn't involve him at all.

Apparently not saying anything transphobic isn't enough, you have to constantly parrot twrw/tmrm are you'll got canceled.

No. 688163

>>684900
>memed into hating white women…I don't think it's helpful

It's not some unfortunate development, it's deliberate kek. Certain groups of women have always hate white women, and they're thrilled their griping has been picked up by mainstream woketard publications and given the green light, and rightwing white men love the loophole it's given them to bash women.

No. 688175

>>688103
This tweet is right though.

No. 688180

>>685224
I knew I smelled a scrote.

No. 689068

File: 1607306232763.png (495.1 KB, 594x536, 3a5e02a0-0ed3.PNG)

being somewhat interested in Cyberpunk I keep seeing this dispute brought up over and over; trans community of twitter is just unhinged
tl;dr
in-game ad shows a feminine character with a visible dick advertising a drink with a slogan "mix it up"; city is filled with ads objectifying men and women alike because it's a commentary on corporate greed and treating people like products; somehow it's fine to do to men and women but doing it to transgender is, quote, "significant harm" and clear evidence of a "transphobia"

No. 689070

>>689068
I honestly wish I could buy the uncensored version of whatever mess they will release to pander the trannies.
Also
>you owe a tranny 70$
They always try to find a way to get money from others, kek.

No. 689077

>>689068
Everything about twitter in general has become way more toxic from this last year alone. I blame everyone being stuck inside and more assholes than ever getting twitter/facebook accounts.
There's a twitter thread up right now for the Game Awards that's filled with people doxxing one another because they didn't vote the same way for a video game award.
https://twitter.com/thegameawards/status/1335608928508420097
This same poll is held every year, and it's never been this way before.

No. 689085

>>689068
or what? is the tranny going to come to my house and delete my save file? he couldn't even photoshop the jacket correctly

No. 689122

>>689068
>trans reparations

No. 689123

File: 1607313918419.jpg (48.33 KB, 454x741, EfqGx1ZXoAM07sq.jpg_large.jpg)

I'm surprised no one has brought up maps(minor attracted people) and how there is a big community of literal pedos that are for some reason allowed on twitter. Also not surprisingly like half time they are troons. Also why are they allowed to be a community and allowed on twitter?

No. 689128

>>689123
Probably because it’s inexcusably disgusting, and there’s not much more to say than that. Like idk how many anons are or aren’t aware of MAPs, but for people that are, there’s only so many ways to wish pedophiles a very painful and torturous death. Can’t answer why Twitter doesn’t do anything about it, though. Maybe the MAP rebranding is working so far and it’s just a matter of enough people catching on.

No. 689154

>>689123
>using Rena for this fucked up shit
Hopefully it's some kind of honeypot situation and it makes them easier to monitor when they're out in the open. I can't for the life of me see why any somewhat established website would allow this shit otherwise.

No. 689175

>>689123
Because twitter protects troons for some reason. CP? Animal abuse? Gore? That's fine. Say something mean about a troon? We're suspending your entire account.

No. 689214

>>689068
Fucking lol I’m buying Cyberpunk 2077 and taking fanart commissions to upset trannies specifically

No. 689223

File: 1607327357892.jpg (118.32 KB, 1242x1364, 22F75vH.jpg)

I don't know why, but suddendly I had gotten many of this complains this past week, the same goes with "Transgender", "Heterosexual" and "Bisexual". I don't get why but I'd like to hear your opinions.

No. 689228

>>689223
Is this a direct message you received? Are you a trans man?

No. 689229

>>689223
Isn't mlm a thing in fanfic to show what the pairing is?

Mlm sounds stupid irl, it won't even work if you're lesbian and you could get it confused with mlm schemes. Just say gay, or y'know homosexual.

No. 689230

>>689223
How??? Actually trying to erase gays. Do they make troons say mtf instead of transexual? Tell them to fuck off and eat shit.

No. 689231

>>689223
What twitter community is this??

No. 689233

>>689228
Oh no! I found it on a post complaining about this, but I have myself see it a lot.

No. 689236

>>689223
>profile maker icon
>asexual flag bg
it is time to block anon

No. 689239

>>689223
samefag but the only people I've ever seen use MLM are troons. That person is just trying to be super woke. There's nothing wrong with those terms

No. 689240

>>689223
Hit them with the why are you assuming my gender with mlm/wlw? I’m sexually attracted to people of the same sex thus homosexual.

No. 689241

File: 1607327978430.png (418.5 KB, 611x381, EoHwMq9WEAAxOWC.png)

>>689229
Kek saw this under the original tweet

No. 689270

>>689240
tell that to all the straight girls who rather be mlm

No. 689271

>>689123
The other stuff in this thread pisses you off but you can laugh about it, MAPs are just sick. But I agree it should be mentioned here, the #1 reason to hate twitter

No. 689344

>>689154
Nta but never thought of it that way, god I hope so. But with thousands of MAP accounts, can feds really arrest or out all of them on a watch list? Are they actually paying attention?

No. 689417

>>689068
The funny thing is, it's not said anywhere that ad was supposed to depict a tranny. In the cyberpunk world, you can go get your body modded for the most ridiculous things. It might be just a real woman who decided to get a dick for a while for fun. Or a glow in the dark strap-on, who knows.
But even if that were a tranny… What else did they want? A more realistic representation showing a fugly balding he ma'am? But then they would've complained that muh trannerinos are depicted as unattractive goblins. You can't win with these people.
Feels good to have preordered the game.

No. 689479

>>689068
And if there wasn't a tranny advertised they'd cry about a lack of representation. Literally boys who cried wolf, no one cares anymore.

No. 689759

>>689123
I will never forgive tumblr for giving birth to this community and spreading this shit on to twitter once the mass exodus happened. I also hate those stupid pedo hunter accounts who keep fucking interacting with them and boosting them in the algorithm.

I'm torn because I do think there should be some kind of help and support group for people struggling with these urges, as a society we do very little to help them (and by helping them we are protecting our most vulnerable members of society by proxy) - but I cannot stand this MAP shit. The acronym is so purposefully trying to mask what they are - pedophiles, and it's enraging and so deceitful it makes me sick. The fact they keep trying to be prideful about it is the worst and they are trying to integrate into the gay community so they can claim their sexuality is valid.
The way it has formed really reminds me of how incel culture became a thing, it started on /r9k/ which became the containment board for incel talk but the issue is that this allowed a community to grow, which eventually spread the ideology and now we have people committing mass shootings because they've been taught they aren't the problem, it's society who's wrong.
The MAP community preys on these people like the incel community does for lonely depressed young men by giving them some validation and luring them in to the false sense of community. Now these people think their sexuality is valid and won't think they need help. Yeah sure, I don't think they should hate themselves for an urge they genuinely don't want provided they never act on it or do anything, but this is just so dangerous to promote to people like this. It's just tragic.

It really scares me how the internet allows all of these fringe groups to gain validity like this, it's not even just these people but the incels, the flat earthers etc. I'm scared to see the impact on society in 15 years time.

No. 689774

>>689759
don't worry about them effecting society or gaining political power to much anon they are fringe groups who can not say what they actually are for a reason.

No. 689777

>>689774
Nta, but true. No matter how much of an open secret pedophilia is, nobody influential will ever support it under any name. The LGB community tells them to fuck off at every opportunity, they're the only ones who support themselves joining kek.
>>689759
> as a society we do very little to help them (and by helping them we are protecting our most vulnerable members of society by proxy)
This is the only reason I could get behind pedophiles receiving help, but I still think all they deserve is the rope or castration if they must live, tbh.

No. 689789

>>689774
I understand where you're coming from, it's just I disagree simply because I've watched many of these groups gain power over the years. Incels being the prime candidates, I know pedos are the biggest social pariahs but if incels can grow as they did I don't put the possibility past any fringe group. It feels like the internet allows radicalization to happen so easily.

>>689777
Idk, not to blog but it's just I have thought about this issue a lot as a survivor of CSA and I just don't think the attitude of "lets just kill them" is constructive. Not trying to be shitty to you or anything anon and I understand the gut reaction because it's a horrible crime, but imo all it does is enable society to sweep the issue under the rug and not tackle the core/root of the problem. That and a lot of people struggling with those urges do so as part of sexual trauma they endured also, I am blessed not to be in that position but it feels a bit fucked up to me to discard those people when they're still suffering due to the abuse that happened to them and they should never have endured in the first place, you know what I mean? Again though, I'm strictly talking about people who don't act on those urges and don't want to be that way, I'm scared of sounding like some kind of apologist so I hope that's very clear.

No. 689797

>>689789
I’m also a survivor of CSA, so I understand where you’re coming from, complex feelings and all. It’s just easier to say, “fuck em,” and stay angry than face the fact that it’s often cyclic, and part of ending that cycle is assisting people like those who have hurt you. But yeah, I get it and realistically, of course that’s the better solution… for non offenders. I stand by what I said for any of them who allow themselves to touch so much as a child’s shoulder for their own pleasure. I’m sure you get it kek.

No. 689807

>>689789
nta but pedos are not that stupid. They can lie and they will lie in order to gain sympathy which they have done many times in the past.
And honestly, I think your approach is dangerous and naive. While trying to be virtous you're heading towards this slippery slope where you're already making exceptions which can then easily lead to some sort of "have pity and try to understand them" path that can be exploited with a smart rhetoric. I'm not saying you're being an apologist but the moment you start making arbitrary decisions like that, you can never go back, only forward. Do you really want to risk the safety of children just so we could as a whole society feel good?

No. 689818

>>689797
Oh definitely anon, I think we’re on the same page here lel. It’s such a complex topic with complex feelings but yeah, I can’t say I have much sympathy for offenders in any way except that it’s sad that as a society we failed to prevent it if that makes sense.

>>689807
I understand your point anon, I do, but there is a different between validation in that way and simply offering realistic treatment and therapy to people like this. There have been quite a few who have been so conflicted with their mental illness they’ve opted for chemical castration and gone through with it just so they could live a normal life.
Here is the thing, what we are doing right now? It just doesn’t work. I know so many people who have been victims too, it’s common, people just don’t talk about it. We ignore the issue so it feels like it doesn’t exist and it puts children at harm and the abuse cycle continues. I just feel like we need to stop being so unwilling to discuss it and actually try to reach out to people who do want to get better.
If you don’t, all you have left for these people are the MAP community which itself validates these people’s mental illness. I made a comparison to incels because incels were in a similar dynamic of being validated and now it’s snowballed in to multiple mass shootings and violence. I’m not saying I have all the answers of course but ignoring it isn’t working, especially in the Internet age where these people can so easily be radicalised instead if we provide no support net for them to potentially help them on the road to a better way to manage it, you know what I mean?

No. 690024

>>689789
>That and a lot of people struggling with those urges do so as part of sexual trauma they endured also
This is a meme.

No. 690213

>>689818
>There have been quite a few who have been so conflicted with their mental illness they’ve opted for chemical castration and gone through with it just so they could live a normal life.
This is a good thing. There is no cure for pedophilia. Talk therapy will not remove it.
It's better for everyone if they just cancel their sexual capacity altogether.

No. 690234

File: 1607458858742.jpg (638.95 KB, 1080x2220, Screenshot_20201208-152041_Chr…)

>>649527
Need some opinions. Found this alleged troon on Twitter but look at this pictures, I just don't fucking see it and am baffled.

The original tweet was like "get owned by a girl with a pp" but I genuinely think she is a female.

More pics incoming

No. 690235

File: 1607458909259.jpg (643.28 KB, 1080x2220, Screenshot_20201208-150925_Ins…)

>>690234
A prom pic from 2019

No. 690237

File: 1607458951054.jpg (825.56 KB, 1080x2220, Screenshot_20201208-151040_Chr…)

>>690234
>>690235
more photos

No. 690241

File: 1607459105446.jpg (344.95 KB, 1072x826, SmartSelect_20201208-152449_Ch…)

>>690237
Apparently her before and after transition:

No. 690248

File: 1607459435776.jpg (454.58 KB, 1073x1265, SmartSelect_20201208-152727_Ch…)

>>690241
Made picrel tweet a few weeks before the whole "get ratio'd" thing.

So what the fuck.

And no this isn't a vendetta. It was an insanely popular tweet that showed up on my TL. https://twitter.com/faerycute/status/1336015873706868738?s=20

No. 690249

>>690248
Could this just be a case of pretending to be trans? Oh well time to check out their twitch channel to confirm.

No. 690253


No. 690258

>>690237
He looks like a literal guy without makeup and snapchat fliters

No. 690259

>>690234
Troons use and abuse filter apps, never trust a monitored pic from these people. Even Kim Petras unmistakably looks like a man on candid pics.

No. 690265

>>690258
In the first pic of that collection, yes. But when he's wearing the blue shirt, I've seen a lot of girls that look like that in middle school/high school so I guess I wanted to be sure before I went ahead and debunked it in the replies.

>>690259
This is true and a part of me was like "Hmmmm…. there just so much facetuning going on right now" but I know I myself don't even look completely "feminine" without makeup, so I would not have been shocked to find out it was a girl. But there are so little pics of him and he just reuses the same pics from twitter on instagram, I was suspicious.

No. 690267

>>690259
Example? Kim is the only troon I’d be fooled by if I didn’t know otherwise.

No. 690284

File: 1607462079925.jpg (82.77 KB, 411x600, Sofia Richie Kim Petras Kate S…)

>>690267
ntayrt, but these pics? He has a huge head. It's a stretch tho, Kim is the rare troon who passes. With that said, the women he's standing next to are very masculine in the face too, he blends in. He might look weird next to the average feminine woman, I don't know.

No. 690285

File: 1607462163624.jpg (220.78 KB, 1200x1800, kim-petras-at-hits-97.3-drive-…)

>>690267
same anon. I only see a male if i look closely, I think kim passes well.

No. 690294

>>690253
The second I heard the voice I knew it

No. 690303

>>690234
isn't she underage?

No. 690308

>>690284
It's like a punch to the gut to see him next to women because every time I see his selectively picked promo pics I think he passes well and I would have never guessed but then you see this and go "welp, I guess not". Like if I didn't know I wouldn't probably clock him but I would be perplexed by his structure.

No. 690312

File: 1607464380622.jpg (306.86 KB, 1536x2048, EQDizllU4AAf7UT.jpg)

>>690237
his boyfriend posted a candid, he looks a lot more manly without lighting and filters

No. 690315

>>690285
he passes but he hs that weird ass troon head they all get, like their heads all seem so huge and he's not really attractive to me, unless he's perfectly posed. Something about him always seems so plastic and stiff.
His pictures are always so bright.

No. 690317

>>690259
why do people still fall for obvious filters on troons? It's annoying, half the time the troons who "pass well" they'll post pictures that are edited or perfectly posed.

No. 690319

>>690317
I treat pictures of them like I treat pictures of the Karjenners or Blaire white, they are always shopped, filtered and posed.
Blaire even lights his videos a certain way.

No. 690327

>>690303
Age not listed anywhere but I am assuming he is 16 or older (allowed) because prom and just the posts that he's made so far.

No. 691430

File: 1607602412959.jpg (71.14 KB, 749x642, 789367.jpg)

I feel like an alien after reading this

No. 691433

>>691430
I wish I didn’t understand whatever that thing said.

No. 691456

>>691430
I play Genshin Impact yet I still have no fucking idea what this tweet is trying to say. I'm trying to decrypt it the best I can:
>Please unfriend "genshin ooc" (I'm guessing that's a twitter account?) because he's bootlicking Mihoyo (the game's developer), retweets hypersexualized art of the female characters in the game, retweets weird ships, called people biphobic for headcanoning Ningguang (a character in the game) as a lesbian and Zhongli (another character) as gay and said that Chongyun and Xingqiu (a popular male x male ship in the fandom) shouldn't be called gay because they're minors
It took me like 30 re-reads before I started comprehending what the fuck was being said here, like trying to decipher an ancient language. Am I just getting too old for zoomer speak?

No. 691457

>>691433
Take a little break from the internet or at least twitter, anon

No. 691830

File: 1607643587157.png (63.33 KB, 1178x174, Screen Shot 2020-12-10 at 5.36…)

we're reaching levels of pickme that shouldn't even be possible

No. 691831

>>691830
elliot rodger and critikal look similar and look how many people like critikal. elliot's problem was that he was a fucking psycho. not his looks

No. 691839

>>691831
Elliot Rodger and Critikal don't look similar at all lmao

No. 691847

>>691830
I actually used to like Jucicka until coombrains and egirls got a hold of her

No. 691927

>>691830
Twitter pickmes are a whole new level of stupidity. I hate that they ruined that Jucika comic. They all just copy each other too.

No. 692086

how has been twitter's reaction to the traffickinghub scenario going on?

No. 692097

>>692086
Is there a new one again or are you talking about that woman whose child porn was uploaded on there after she got kidnapped and discovered by her mother while ph tries to sweep it under the rug?

No. 692102

>>692097
The news about creditcard companies severing their ties with pornhub due to the illegal content it's been profitting off of.

No. 692109

>>692086
Just go on twitter and search pornhub. If you go on someone's account first you won't need to log in to use the site.

No. 692112

>>692109
Samefag but most of the people I've seen are saying it's good that mastercard and visa are cutting ties and that pornhub should either be shut down or regulate their videos better. I think PH is also banned unverified videos now.

No. 692528

>>691847
It's just boomer ecchi comic

No. 692657

>>692086
Camwhores on twitter are melting down bigtime

No. 692713

File: 1607741318437.jpeg (482.26 KB, 1309x1605, 4BBF255C-79CC-4543-887B-C982D2…)

What

No. 692715

File: 1607741426680.jpeg (151.2 KB, 1345x673, 9B9B7035-A917-4379-BDE7-34F037…)

>>692713
Like, I don’t get why they should’ve been “at least NB”

No. 692720

>>692713
transgenders really are mentally ill aren't they

No. 692723

>>692713
I don’t get how any random historical woman who cross-dressed is considered trans/nb now. Look at the female clothes from that time, it was like 5 corsets and 20 layers of skirt. Obviously any woman doing physical activity would have worn men’s clothing or tried to appeal male to not be raped. Really not rocket science.

No. 692734

>>692723
Not that it matters, but weren't corsets back then actually meant to be comfortable? Women had to do various activities with them throughout the day, so I doubt they were out of breath and extremely uncomfortable all the time. I mean, I'm sure they were still a uncomfortable but not in the same way the modern corsets would be

No. 692770

>>692723
>>692734
Corsets back in the day for most people were the equivalent to bras - holding your boobs in one place was more valued than the body shape (pretty much only actresses or the upper class would tightlace, mostly to show off how much they didn't need movement in their day-to-day life as well as the fashionable silhouettes). Some professions did forgo the corset, the only one I can think of off the top of my head is female coal miners, who also wore trousers instead of skirts. Sorry for the OT sperging lol. I wonder if this crowd would have labeled every female coalminer as secretly a trans man too.

No. 693071

>>692528
NTA, but you're right, every Jucika strip is just "whacky situation leads to Jucika getting undressed" or "Jucika flirts to get something". But it also has some of that Kádár-era communism nostalgia, which is why it's weird to me that american coomers got attached to it. I used to follow one of the accounts reposting strips until the account started commenting on actual politics for no reason.

No. 693223

File: 1607812154231.jpeg (67.13 KB, 732x412, 92514EC0-B1CC-412D-B07D-6A7724…)

>>692713
I realize this is twitter hate thread but when will God grant me a lesbian pirate gf

No. 693461

File: 1607842862513.jpg (187.33 KB, 1080x391, SmartSelect_20201213-015759_Ch…)

On a post about a girl who wants to fuck her brother and marry her.

No. 693476

>>693461
I'm just amazed at how someone could say this so calmly

No. 693478

>>693461
…do they realize that most people only have their family and a few friends for support? Who even has a big support net? Cult leaders?

No. 693479

>>693461
>some troons easily misinterpret this and develop romantic feelings for their family

No. 693482

>>692770
>I wonder if this crowd would have labeled every female coalminer as secretly a trans man too.
>wore trousers
>“historical masc profession”
I don’t doubt it, considering those are the only requirements for a historical figure to be declared trans. Only men want to wear trousers and leave their house to do things, obviously.

No. 693499

>>693461
Someone PLEASE nuke twitter, these degens are getting too comfortable.

No. 693504

>>693461
Trannies have the support of the whole world, what else does he want? Does he not see how he is being catered to?

No. 693510

>>693461
this is satire, it has to be, this is unbelievable

No. 693517

>>692713
alright super off topic here but the original title is inaccurate, Anne Bonny and Mary Read's story has been known for 250 years now, Literally every historical book/Documentary on the Golden Age of Piracy will mention them, the only details that changed is how new historians contextualize the events, it's still iffy if they had a sexual/romantic relationship, seeing as both were found to be between pregnancy before their capture, and didn't make any big qualms about loving each other as they were locked up, hell it's even possible the details/rumors of a relationship between the two were added rather then suppressed, basically as a way to further demonize them

so accepting them as totes canon lesbian lovers whose story was suppressed by the meany old historians is an Insult to both these omen and the subject of history, cause they were real people and not some fictional ship but placing our current views on Gender and sexuality on actual historical people just cause we want it to is stupid

No. 693520

File: 1607853852183.jpg (53.99 KB, 640x618, Reflective squeamish locust_e8…)

Does anyone else get so drained when these people complain and try to cancel people over the most minimal and useless stuff ever? like that one time people were trying to cancel a girl for using a black hairstyle on her white character and calling it space buns? in a fun and relaxing game? yeah that happened, or when jacksepticeye made a harmless joke about the ps5 or used a font? yeah that too.

Isn't really surprising to me since most of these people complaining about it are brainlets with the intelligence of a larva. I wish they could focus on real problems that need to be dealt with, theres literally predators on that platform but oh no how dare you call afro puffs space buns and use it in a game!! what a fucking joke.

Since when did Twitter become such a degenerate cesspool?

No. 693523

>>693520
On the one hand I agree, on the other hand I bet you are one of those people who think that no one should be canceled at all for any reason.

No. 693524

>>693520
To be fair, you're only seeing the worst of the worst in this thread. I've seen a lot of good done on Twitter more than I've come across the bad. The people petitioning for canceling on my timeline usually refers to people actually doing something harmful and calls for accountability.

No. 693543

>>693461
>My family member is nice to me, so I fall in love with them!
Uh what

No. 693718

>>693520
the tumblr porn ban had a bunch of them move to twitter

No. 694146

>>691830
Sounds like the average /g/ poster.

No. 694729

File: 1608068308573.jpg (297.35 KB, 597x499, IYc9NpH.jpg)

I'm not sure what is happening in Cartoon Network, but this thing is not funny anymore.

No. 694731

>>693718
why did they move to twitter in the first place when most of them don't even post porn? can't they just keep their drama on a dying platform
>>694729
steven universe was a mistake

No. 694734

File: 1608068550796.jpg (125.08 KB, 1024x1024, ppp2mdC.jpg)

1/4

No. 694735

File: 1608068655130.jpg (127.2 KB, 1024x1024, fP5sAXn.jpg)


No. 694736

File: 1608068788650.jpg (104.94 KB, 1024x1024, 05i5WN9.jpg)


No. 694740

>>694729
Do people still care about steven pooniverse anymore? i thought its main audience aka tumblr (let's be real, did any actual kiddies watch this show?) cancelled it long ago

No. 694741

File: 1608068982421.jpg (112.75 KB, 1024x1024, jfJXNxi.jpg)

>>694736
4/4
>>694740
I don't think so, I haven't seen a single kid enjoying Steven Universe ever since a long time ago, but CN have been pushing this sort of stuff for a while now.

No. 694744

>>694734
>ze/zir

jfc, this generation is going to be ruined with this asinine bullshit.

No. 694753

>>694744
Part of me feels like the adults who pander this to kids must be pedophiles. Why else would they care so much about a kids gender identity and making kids think so much about it? It’s fucking creepy

No. 694754

>>694741
All of them look horribly drawn.
>>694740
The last time I saw SU mentions was when people called Rebecca Sugar a pedophile under CN tweet n they had to mute it.

No. 694760

>>694736
>>694735
…Did they change artists for every panel? The Alex character's eyes keep changing sizes

No. 694763

>>694735
>I feel seen
kek

No. 694766

>>694736
>people who affirm who I am
Come on, this has to be a shitpost.

No. 694807

>>694753
Me too, for example that time when that cartoon, Craig of the creek, introduced that character named Angel, a they/them kid who asked for pronouns, and CN posted that clip with a "Respect They/them pronouns" message; it feels… wrong, like Angel doesn't sound like a kid at all and I don't like how they presented that character as "Very good with children".

At this point, I am starting to loose my trust for anyone who works with animation.

No. 694815

>>694807
I’ve never heard of that show so looked it up and the angel character is actually based on one of the adult male creators with the same name who also identifies as a they/them. Creepy

No. 694821

>>694815
First Jared Shapiro from the Powerpuff girls and now this guy? Is CN baiting by putting Jared Fogle looking asses as kids?

No. 694826

>>694741
Isn’t it kind of weird how the gender specials and a guy are the ones educating the girl?

No. 694832

>>694821
also the woman who created The Owl House made a self-insert that's in love with the main character (who is a child)

No. 694978

File: 1608090914957.jpg (145.1 KB, 1000x1000, Angel_Lorenzana_2020_Pride_Art…)

>>694807
>>694815
jesus christ i just looked this up. i'm all for showing more lgbt characters in kids' media but this is… fucking weird. they're dressing in the way ADULTS do at pride fests which aren't always g-rated. honestly more creepy than nice. you can show this stupid and just make it like, normal, without making it rainbow flags and flamboyant outfits and pride uniform.

No. 694983

>>694729
Thank goodness I didn't grow up with today's cartoon network,how deplorable.children don't care about stupid gender bs let them live their childhoods in peace
How low can Twitter get at this point?

No. 694988

File: 1608092854817.jpg (25.04 KB, 568x454, screanub.jpg)

>>694729
>>694734
>>694735
>>694736
>>694741
>>694978
am I even alive anymore?
why is this even a thing? why can't we just be women (or men) who have a personality and interests? what's wrong with being just gay or bi?
are people today really this damaged? there's nothing to justify the existence all of this stupid language and identity shit.
when will this nightmare end?

No. 694992

>>693523
NTA but that sure is one way to jump into conclusion, anon. I hate cancel culture too, doesn't mean I defend predators n shit

No. 695019

>>694729
Cartoon Network's twitter account has been a huge trainwreck for a while now. It feels unreal browsing it, like some 4chan parody op to make fun of them.

>>694744
>>694753
If it's offering any comfort, I doubt any kid is going to see this. CN seems to be making this content solely for autistic adults and late teens and basically preaching to the choir. Kids these days watch youtube and Disney movies, not Cartoon Network shows.

No. 695022

>>694735
This is…very dumb, like pronouns even matter that much or are that validating that these halfassed comics needed to be made.

No. 695030

>>695019
I'm just waiting to Cartoon Network to joins DC and Marvel's train, loosing a huge amount of money for pandering to people who DON'T buy their woke garbage.

No. 695034

>>694760
truly a steven universe outfit

No. 695062

>>694729
>>694735
>>694741
CalArts. Not even once.

No. 695117

File: 1608108888475.jpg (5.8 KB, 293x274, 1591571691125.jpg)

>>694729
what the fuck am i reading. why do kids like this shit

No. 695388

>>694988
tbh its why i dont consider myself part of "the community" anymore. they act like clowns. i am just a bi bitch who appreciates other gay and bi bitches and it doesnt have to be anything more than that. fuck "the community" esp when theres so much stupid shit and infighting

No. 695389

>>695388

let's be real, at least 95% of the shit is caused by the T part of the alphabet soup, the rest is just generic LGB in-figting

No. 695391

>>695389
regardless its not a good place to feel accepted. ive had lesbians be hostile toward me for being bi so im "fake" or something. idc. i can have pride and avoid them

No. 695407

>>695389
Keep telling yourself that.
There are histrionic self obsessed bitches of every persuasion, there are so many awful straight people who are just as annoying and imo that's the main reason why those types of straight people are so jealous about Pride. The sooner lgbt becomes an old boring concept the better, that way diva-types can't use their sexuality as a personality type or an excuse for being the worst person in the room
T. A boring bi person

No. 695426

>>695117
they don't, kids just watch youtube now adays, modern cartoons are made by manchildren for manchildren

No. 695568

>>694734
Wait, is stuff like Ze/Zir actually pushed nowadays? I thought we left that in 2014 tumblr and even then it was only for the most deranged wtf lmao

No. 695757

File: 1608165337535.png (381.15 KB, 1286x952, kingself.png)

for the love of god kick all these kids off the internet

No. 695761

>>695757
when will the trans trend end. pls dear god.

No. 695767

>>695761
there will be a new trend to take over soon, i'm predicting otherkin will be a big thing again since 2020 twitter is literally 2014 tumblr except the 14 year olds now are even more obnoxious

No. 695773

>>695388
i'm a lesbian and i agree 100%

>>695757
tbh i can't feel sorry for the "community" now. they created this shitshow when they allowed the T, "allies", furries, and all sorts of nutjobs to call themselves "queer" and thus validated their insane delusions.

>>695767
>i'm predicting otherkin will be a big thing
they're already considered "trans", so…

No. 695793

File: 1608168975761.jpg (110.29 KB, 1024x862, nickiminjaj.jpg)

>>695757
Maybe a less popular opinion here, but I genuinely can't feel outraged over galaxy-brain troonery like this because I know for the vast majority of these retards this is a stupid LARP that only exists online. You just know that the people who do galaxy troon BS on twitter or tumblr almost completely overlap with the "too nervous to ask for extra ketchup at McDonalds" crowd. The furthest they will go in real life is using they/them pronouns since that is the only new pronoun development that actually gained "major acceptance". This twitter galaxy troon BS is only a power trip among their circle of similarly maladjusted people. Normie people of all stripes, even the Normie wokes would laugh and/or scoff at this shit and most of these retards know it.

No. 695794

>>694741
Holy shit, there's no hope. I'm so glad I didn't grow up with this foolishness hooo boy.

No. 695814

>>695793
It's funny as shit but troonery was also looked down and mocked, yet here we are.

No. 695855

>>695757
why are children being allowed to speak for an entire movement and decide the social rules of what is accepted and what is problematic

No. 695864

>>695814
Traditional troonery (kek can't believe I'm saying this) at least was already riding on the LGBT wave and what they are attempting to present themselves as is grounded in some type of reality, even if it is retarded (i.e. presenting as hyperfeminine and wanting to be seen as "women") rather than goblingender or w/e the fuck galaxy troons are trying to do. Hell, "traditional troonery" even have the "passing" "normal" troons as example of "normal twans ppl who just wanna pee in their desired bathrooms in peace!!1". The closest thing to galaxytroon shit that is somewhat acceptable is identifying as nonbinary, and there are still plenty of people iffy about that. I don't see this neopronoun shit going far, considering the type of people who adopt that shit in the first place. Even the Wokes would attack these people for "trivializing actual trans ppl!!" like that tweet replying to the king pronoun retard lol. Maybe I'm underestimating this, but I feel like constant exposure to these uber-retards is just a symptom you are Extremely Online. There is definitely too much troon madness that is becoming mainstream ("menstruators" "uterus-bearers" so we don't offend trannies, sports debacles), but this type of shit originated on Tumblr way back and never truly took off as a part of mainstream troonery and we all know that Twitter is the new Tumblr now kek. I could just be overly optimistic and putting too much faith in people, though.

No. 695912

File: 1608187421529.jpg (17.17 KB, 592x107, XzBmf00.jpg)

I hated so much when that comic panel with the Joker hating nazis became so popular, now there are a lot of these kids going around saying "Well, he killed millions of innocent people, BUT he hates nazis, so he is one of us gaiz!!1!!1"

No. 695915

>>695793
Nah, with the institutional capture and big pharma this shit isn't a joke. Normies might mostly ignore and not believe it, but the people obviously speaking against it are getting push back for a reason.

No. 695932

>>695793
Honestly agree. The wacky rainbow emoji neopronoun crowd is something the "true troons" shit on to look better in comparison when in fact they're probably the most harmless sect of the whole ideology for the reasons you mentioned. It's the actual tranners who take their shit seriously and bring it to real life that cause most of the damage.

No. 696093

>>695757
>our siblings are being raped and murdered every day
I hate when they said that, because… it's literally not true. They spout actual fake news for outrage points.

No. 696186

>>696093
Nta and tbh why should we give a fuck anyway? a bunch of people gets murdered daily, should we constantly cry over their deaths? Can we make schedules to read their obituaries and cry the same quantity of tears for everyone?
I hate their use of people’s lives as a shield so much.

No. 697032

File: 1608322988938.jpeg (328.86 KB, 750x949, AD0EAC1C-E229-4230-AA9A-106B2A…)


No. 697035

>>697032
But they’re weak wittle girls, anon! They wouldn’t do anything to harm anyone!/s

No. 697041

>>695388
Agree. Most of the weird stuff happens with the T and the Q-slur honestly. Agree with you -> >>695389

No. 697078

>>697032
the most masculine voice

No. 697306

File: 1608348703935.jpg (54.29 KB, 1024x777, u9ivzuq.jpg)

I can't tell if this person is joking or not, but the picrew avatar with the pannie flag is giving me the feeling that no, they are not joking.

No. 697330

File: 1608353656268.jpg (35.34 KB, 720x391, yQW6d10.jpg)

14 year olds when you have as a husbando/waifu one of their 30+ kinnie or comfort characters.

No. 697335

>>697306
He's not technically wrong, but the fact that he even cares probably means he's a pornsick scrote.

No. 697337

>>697330
>ESPECIALLY if they're fictional characters
Priorities.

No. 697339

>>697330
I wish there was an option to block every single minor on twitter.

No. 697415

>>697306
iirc this tweet was in vaush's likes kek. I said this in another thread too but some leftist men will find a way to call anything that gets in the way of their coom fascism/eugenics/censorship etc

No. 697502

>>697330
I can't wait until these kids turn 25 and still find cartoon anime teens attractive. They'll be eaten alive by the monster they helped to create.

No. 697683

>>697339
Please god, they're the ones that do most of the shit flinging on this website.

No. 697693

File: 1608413876234.jpg (110.94 KB, 1080x692, N0Pnjdi.jpg)

I can't deal with these sheltered kids.

No. 697696

>>697693
>minor
>20s
the jokes write themselves

No. 697698

>>697306
eugenics is good if people actually used them correctly instead of using eugenics as an excuse to be an ass or blab on about things they're uneducated about (claiming dark skinned women with deep voices shouldn't reproduce, claiming any sort of mental illness like minor depression or social anxiety means you shouldn't reproduce, etc)

the point of eugenics is to reduce the likelihood that an innocent baby doesn't get birth defects, which is a good thing, but the conservative trump cult followers seem to whine all day about how people need to bred with exclusively big titty white waifus no matter how fat, mentally ill, or physically defective they are but turn around and whine about how being against pedophilia and incest is eugenics. Because it is only ok when they get to choose it is I guess

No. 697699

>>697696
>>697502
Once those children get older, they will start to use that ~20 year old minor~ as the new scape to don't be eaten alive.

No. 697701

>>697693
As a 20+ year old who's found older men hot this is fucking hilarity to me

No. 697705

>>697693
I know words don’t have meanings anymore but I’d put this under “completely fucking retarded” rather than “sheltered”

Idk the context but if there’s actually an issue with this situation, there are words for that. There are vulnerable adults, and someone can be raped or abused at any age. People are going to automatically write off what they’re saying if they insist on using inaccurate language.

No. 697708

>>697693
children's opinions on adult sexuality and relationships are worthless and should be thrown in the garbage immediately

No. 697709

>>697693
>20+ years old minor
How sheltered does one have to be in order to achieve this degree of delusion?
I just have so many questions about this sort of logic, being the most worrisome
>does that make it acceptable for them to interact with kids?
Because that sounds like a groomer ideal world.

No. 697816

>>697693
how much do you guys wanna bet that this was written by a 17 year and 364 days old who harasses people nonstop and hides under the "i'm literally a minor" excuse when called out and will continue to infantilize themselves to avoid responsibility once they turn 18

No. 697832

File: 1608433106576.jpg (119.7 KB, 1079x890, UQZZGvn.jpg)

It's not good enough to show ~twans wepwesentasion~? What a weird gatekeeping when they are constantly begging for representation.

No. 697837

>>697693
I desperately need an explanation as to what they think a minor in their 20s is.

No. 697839

>>697837
a lot of american twitterfags consider 18, 19, and 20 year olds minors since you can't buy alcohol until you're 21 in the states. i'm assuming that's what they mean by "20 year old minor"

No. 697841

>>697839
A lot of Americans also want the age of consent to be raised to 25

No. 697848

>>697841
i've seen some people on the tumblry side of anitwitter say that everyone under 25 is a minor. like yeah 18-24 year olds are young and can still make bad decisions, but… you're still legally an adult and you need to start taking some responsibility for how you act

No. 697854

>>697841
No we fucking don't.

No. 698053

>>697839
Okay, in terms of alcohol I can see that. But the tweet is talking about pedophilia and says that “the minor in question is in their 20’s” (which could be any age from 20-29 lol). That doesn’t make sense when the age of consent is 18.

No. 698106

>>697841
Not american, but I think the idea of raising the legal age for drinking to 25 would be nice, there would be less issues with alcohol theoretically than there are nowadays.

No. 698232

>>698106
Also not american and I have the complete opposite opinion, my country's drinking age is 18, by the time people are 25 drinking already became boring and not a big deal, there's no glamour around alcohol and being drunk like there is in america.

No. 698293

>>698106
Raising it doesnt prevent people from drinking under the legal age. In my country it's 18, yet people would be shocked when I told them I didnt drink at 16.

No. 698334

>>697837

>a lot of american twitterfags consider 18, 19, and 20 year olds minors


and yet they can't connect the dots to why children can't consent to puberty blockers.

No. 698354

>>698232
The drinking age in my country is 18 too, I think it’s fine as it is the adulthood age? you already get the dumb 15 and 16 year old yobs drinking in parks and outside because they can’t drink legally in bars and pubs. So I think making the limit higher would only cause more of that, also I do think that around 19/20+ the novelty and excitement of going out loads and drinking wears off

No. 698403

>>695757
This person saying not respecting neopronouns is ableist is the funniest take so far. Sure enough autists and aspies will have a harder time adapting to made up nonsense words than normal people, so aren’t the genderspecials the ableists here?

No. 698406

>>698106
I think raising it would have little to no effect, maybe even worsen the situation. The problem isn’t that young people are drinking but the way they are drinking. The issue isn’t having a couple of drinks but the fact binge drinking is common. Raising it would just be like government virtue-signalling rather than working out why people are doing this and how it can be reduced.

No. 698483

>>697693
Wot? Paedophilia is attraction to 10 and unders, Hebephilia is attraction to 11-14 year olds and ephebophilia is attraction to 15-19 year olds. All mentally ill and need to be vaporised.

>>698403 Yeah it would make them ableist and autismphobic since it's towards autistic people.

No. 699508

File: 1608618728472.jpg (104.97 KB, 1212x1075, AAh3ixB.jpg)

Coomers going crazy trying to convince themselves that they are not groomers.

No. 699511

File: 1608618809488.jpg (137.84 KB, 1242x1238, oUE49ri.jpg)


No. 699512

>>695757
maybe it's just the fact that I don't hang out with retards but none of the trannies I've met irl have even used or cared about this neopronoun crap, seems to exist almost entirely on the internet, and is popular amongst deluded 14-20 year olds or 20-30 year old turboautists who never matured past the aforementioned ages, I swear I've never seen this crap leak outside the internet

No. 699515

>>698483
why do you care so much about the semantics though? a pedo is a pedo, under 18 is under 18. who cares what subculture of pedoism a pedo belongs to? caring about that is oddly creepy

No. 699519

>>699508
they mean minors (boys) committing rape and sex crimes, not adult predators. still stupid take, if a boy is that fucked up as a kid he should be on some kind of list.

No. 699528

>>699511
Wow, that guy is fucked up beyond repair.

No. 699552

>>699508
>>699511
i hope to god these are trolls but even if they are, this shit isn't funny

No. 699622

>>699515
NTA but I think it's messed up how people stopped caring about semantics when it comes to the word pedo; there's a huge difference between the level of fucked up a person who is attracted exclusively to prepubescent children has to be and a person who engages with physically developped 17 year olds would be. Are both wrong and predatory? Yes. But one is far more depraved than the other and we gotta recognize that.

No. 699666

>>699622

I once saw a pedo sting video from Ireland where they stung someone for grooming a 16 year old decoy. Like, they were screeching about how they wouldn't know anything about sex. I mean it was Ireland so maybe that's true.

No. 700124

>>698403
Clearly they weren't on Tumblr in 2013 and didn't see hundreds of fandom bloggers become GC because of this shit.

No. 700207

>>699511
Jesus Christ. Didn't twitter boot the pedos?
>>699622
There's a reason for this; for many years, predators defended their attractions to young people by insisting that they're ephebebeobebephiles/hebephiles (usually paired with bullshit evo biology folk theories/general misogyny) in order to evade criticism; because the distinction has been exclusively made by predators for virtually the entire history of the internet, the internet is weary to it. The stupidity surrounding the 'antis' of whatever they're called is a totally separate issue.

No. 700398

>>699511
Ofc he's a furry

No. 700407

>>695912
Kek, how does dating a Jewish person automatically not make you an anti-semite? Aren't these the same people who argue that dating a black person doesn't automatically make you not racist?

No. 700412

>>700124
A bit OT but there's been recently o Tumblr a resurgence of old fandom posts to make fun of them, and almost all of these straight girls have become fakebois, it's so eerie.

No. 700454

>>699515
I wouldn't mess with anyone that's 18 or 19 tbh. I wasn't obsessing about the semantics or whatever either, I was just trying to make a point about how even if 18 or 19 is an "adult", it's still fucked up.
>>699622
Totally agree with you as I'm the anon they replied to earlier. Because just because one is 17 and almost fully developed doesn't mean it's not creepy as you said earlier.

No. 700462

File: 1608680031548.jpg (111.02 KB, 1125x1745, wXpNSRK.jpg)

Now they are trying to cancel the tradwife wojack and the nordic guy.
1/3

No. 700463

File: 1608680104059.jpg (93.52 KB, 1125x1148, TIHFgyP.jpg)

>>700462
What does "/g" means btw?
2/3

No. 700465

File: 1608680169114.jpg (76.33 KB, 1125x870, fpnXDkJ.jpg)


No. 700467

>>700463
It's a tone tag (like /s) that stands for "genuine"

No. 700475

>>700467
that might be the most autistic concept I've ever heard of

No. 700482

>>700475
Well, I'm pretty sure that's the point, actually. I've seen a lot of people say it's for autistic people who aren't able to normally detect tone through text.

No. 700510

>>700463
>i have no idea who made this image
That's the POINT of it coming from an anonymous image board. Twitterfags finding out about wojaks is a curse.

No. 700609

File: 1608700366975.jpg (73.15 KB, 1080x839, JKmIQin.jpg)

I…
I get some pickme vibe coming from this, but I want to know your opinions.

No. 700612

>>700609
holy fuck that's dumb

No. 700613

>>700609
People are surely willing to say anything for clout. Just accept them! There’s no need to make a huge statement about it or anything
>I hereby declare all nipples of all shades as beautiful as any other budding roses in the garden of life.
Why don’t we all just make a huge ass signed paper about how every single body part of every single human is beautiful and amazing and valid?

No. 700614

>>700609
I don't really get pickme vibes, it just feels like an attempt at woke-ifying a self esteem issue. It's not enough to be body positive or normalize different natural bodies, it has to be about oppression to get enough internet brownie points.

No. 700615

>>700613
She is sad because she isn't a coomer's porn star waifu fantasy.

No. 700621

File: 1608701785771.png (57.01 KB, 744x307, 4sryFf5.png)

>>700609
nobody's oppressed over having brown nipples but damn, i don't see why twitterfags couldn't let the top girl have her post without derailing it. it seems like people can't praise unconventionally attractive traits without everyone else coming out of the woodwork and acting like picrel

No. 700639

>>700609
If they said big nipples I would get this cause people do make fun of women for having big nips, but as a poc woman I've never really seen people idolize pink nipples.

But the girl on the bottom is right, if top girl wanted to praise brown nipples, then she should be able to do so without people butting in to say "Well ALL nipples are good", she's not talking about all nipples, she's talking about brown ones.

Also, genuine question: What would even be pickme about those tweets? I feel like some anons here really like to throw that word around.

No. 700657

>>700609
surprised there are this many people who believe everyone is vain enough to care about the color of their fuckbuddy's nips

No. 700663

>>700639
To me, is how the bottom tweet seems to be more over what random guys say rather than how it's okay to have different shades.
I don't have that much of a big problem with the top one, but the second one seems more like an unnecessary thing to add.

No. 700679

File: 1608708011563.jpg (63.01 KB, 718x919, nC9UwcV.jpg)


No. 700691

>>700679
We live in a society.

No. 700694

>>700679
god these people would've died in the primitive years of the internet not being able to attention whore as hard as they can now. maybe technological advancements and social media were a mistake after all

No. 700702

>>700679
I had been wondering why I had seen so many wokefags on Twitter put "White" on their bio like it was some badge of honor kek. I swear if someone with a cartoon tranny flag avatar told white users to put "Nazi descendant" to warn all the "BIPOC"s they'd do it in an instant.

No. 700705

>>700679
>I'm woke
>I support segregation

No. 700712

>>699622
Basically this. I'm desensitized to the whole word because it's been used so much to describe a 19-year old going out with a 17-year old, a 21-year old replying to a 17-year old's tweet or someone who ships two anime teens. I absolutely hate how the word got so diluted that it lost its meaning because actual child abusers are despicable and need to be called out whenever it happens. Twitterfags cried wolf too many times and this happened.

No. 700720

>>700679
The way OP acts is cringe but everyone has the right to not interact with someone if they don't want to, for any reason.

No. 700725

>>700702
Yeah, it really reminds me of some /pol/ shenanigans, it's hilarious.

No. 700729

>>700720
Well, no shit everyone has the right not to interact? Just don't reply. You can't create a public Twitter profile and then expect everyone you don't like to just refrain from interacting with you, it's up to you to create your own online experience. Make a private account or block people. I'm not going to put personal identifying information on my Twitter bio to please a few crybabies who might get triggered if I retweet something from them.

No. 700966

File: 1608743823809.jpg (372.99 KB, 1077x1075, Screenshot_20201223-120754_Fir…)

Terfs are secret troons, didn't u know?

No. 700967

File: 1608743849739.jpg (536.31 KB, 1041x1677, Screenshot_20201223-120916_Fir…)


No. 700975

>>700967
>terfs/butches don't like being woman, so they try to fight against the expectations and stereotypes that come with it
>transmen don't like being a woman, so they pretend to be anything else but

No. 701004

>>700966
The tweet right under this is pure misogyny, "she's doing all this instead of dealing with her issues!" BITCH no one would say a man needs therapy in order to stop caring about whatever political thing he might care about. No, it's woman, so she needs to stop being emotional. Because clearly that's the most important thing in all of her points.

No. 701008

>>700967
>They all seem to think every woman is as miserable as they are too
LMAO at this Uncle Tom rhetoric. If you don't care about the suffering of woman aside from yourself, just say it and don't pussyfoot around it. Wrapping your misogyny in academia and faux wokeness does nothing to conceal it.

No. 701020

>>700966

This "doctor" seems to think pretending not to have read the whole thing means she can be completely disingenuous about what Rowling was saying.

No. 701061

>>700967
>they chafed under the lack of options
how do these morons live their lives without stopping to consider that learning to accept yourself for who you are is a MUCH better option than filling yourself with meds and trying to fundamentally change who you are?

No. 701416

Being that technical is retarded. If they don't wanna interact with white people they might as well kill themselves and drop off the face of the earth, they aren't going to get anywhere in life if they're busy crying over a white person looking at them.

No. 701712

>>700966
>>700967
They keep almost getting it and then just failing to bring the thought home when their mental gymnastics get in the way.
>Oh these terfs who sympathize with gender dysphoria because they know they would've been suckered in earlier but learned to accept themselves as they are and instead recognized the deeprooted misogyny in our society so they can fight it? they're just mad they didn't have the guts to transition!!!!!
Ultimate cope.

No. 702494

File: 1608910146239.jpg (230.01 KB, 1115x894, 1607947307365.jpg)

>>700966
>bad writing
Kek, says the twittertard mad that JKR is still one of the top writers of this century. Seethe, cope and dilate.

No. 702969

File: 1608980208892.png (101.78 KB, 1080x449, Screenshot_20201220-133148~2.p…)

This is so fucking stupid, while it's true that customers tend to be annoying and in the wrong, there's also salespeople who are not very friendly either. I'm not asking that they'd be all rainbows and sunshine and I'm not going to write a letter if they are not the nicest (not going to blame people for having a bad day), but I'm pretty sure everybody had at least once an interaction with a cashier that was needlessly rude.

No. 702980

>>702969
Agreed, actually having worked retail makes me not empathize at all with bored/rude/mean store people. I had to stand all day and do boring things for hours on end too but it didnt stop me from smiling to people and being nice to them, it's not hard.

No. 702984

>>702969
This person never went to Zara it seems.

No. 702985

>>702984
Honestly Zara employees (and similiar stores) get a pass from me. I've had friends working at stores like Zara, primark etc. and their working conditions are hell.

No. 702992

>>702969
I’ll admit as a store employee I was rude to the people who came in on Christmas Day, but I did it with subtlety

No. 702993

>>702969
I was subtly rude to the customers that threw there drinks/ food/ trash at me when i worked fast food

No. 703000

>>702985
Honestly I've worked for Primark for a little bit more than a year and if I behaved like Zara's employees just once I'd have been fired on the spot and wouldnt eve. be allowed to gain unemployment benefits.

No. 703002

>>702992
Why though?

No. 703006

>>702969
>>702980
I also worked retail, and while we definitely got some horrific customers sometimes, a lot of my coworkers used to act like they were personally bothered just by people coming into the store. This one guy used to be on his phone constantly and sigh heavily whenever a customer asked him something, it was so embarrassing. It's really not hard to smile and say hello.

No. 703011

>>703002
Seconding the why. I work in a different country to the US and UK but I in the past have worked in food service and never have been reprimanded for telling someone off for acting rude. It's weird and creepy if you act like a robot who smiles to rude behaviour.

No. 703012

>>702969
I really only see rude behavior on the regular from postal workers, it seems to attract people who want to make other people's lives harder. Had this old hag try and tax every overseas package I had come in, and it was only her that did it, even if the international shipping fee was already paid. Her problem was entirely that "I ordered too many non-local things and needed to be taught a lesson"
>>702985
Honestly I'm surprised Zara still operates, aren't most people aware of the working conditions inside the store and of the people making the clothes being sold there? Every Zara store I've looked in not only manages to look like a damn sweatshop, it also manages to always have clothing strewn around the floor. I'm not talking a shirt or two, multiple articles of clothing across multiple aisles, often enough to cover the floor.

No. 703014

>>703011
But I don't think anon was telling people off for being rude? Pretty sure she was the one who was rude based off her post

No. 703016

>>703002
Because if people come on christmas day it justifies the store being open and working on what could be a holiday.

No. 703019

>>703016
What do you mean? Plenty of stores close on Christmas and Christmas Eve, even big chain stores. If your store chose to stay open then that's their fault, not the customers. It's just weird to be rude to customers for that.

No. 703020

>>703019
>Christmas Eve
That’s actually one of the biggest sale days of the year in America

No. 703022

>>703019
>Plenty of stores close on Christmas Eve

Not true

No. 703026

>>703019
>>703022
It's almost as if stores don't do the same thing everywhere

No. 703027

>>703019
Can't you just get your shit before christmas eve? Who in their right mind go shopping the day before xmas?

No. 703030

>>703027
I agree that you should, but I just don't get being rude to the customer for that when at the end of the day, they didn't decide to keep the store open on Christmas.

No. 703061

>>703016

It wouldn't be a paid holiday. Don't worry, anon soon Amazon will kill your retail job and you can move to the warehouse away from all those cunty customers.

No. 703071

>>702984
>>703000
>>703012
ot but all of you anons that dislike zara shops/workers, where are you from?
Inditex stores are actually one of the better clothes retail stores in my country (eastern euro) and they're always nice and tidy, their staff is okay and their hr is petty decent here. Speaking as someone that shops there often and people I know work there.
I'm curious because it seems it isn't like that anywhere else, maybe because my country is so lame we see those stores as more high quality even though they're just fast fashion stores.
I do agree zara workers are pretty cold and bitchy though, girls in bershka/pull and bear are nicer, but that's also because employers actively look for conventionally pretty/kind of bitch faced girls in zara while other inditex stores don't have that requirement here. For example you don't need to wear makeup in bershka, but you must in zara.

No. 703075

>>703061
I do want to be gone, replacement by robots can't come fast enough.

No. 703120

>>703016
…did you not expect to work on one of the biggest shopping days of the year? If your store is open, don't get angry at the customers for taking advantage of what is available to them. Get angry at the store for being open. Or angry at yourself you agreed to work a job that has a high likelihood of working on a federal holiday.
Plus not everyone celebrates Christmas and wants to sit inside their house all day doing nothing because most other things are closed.

>>702985
Seriously. Customers are usually the assholes. Workers aren't the ones throwing clothes on the floor and putting things where they don't belong, it's the customers. It makes me so angry when I see people drop something in the store and leave in on the floor. So rude.

No. 703140

>>703030
A lot of retail hours are based on previous year's metrics, so a few last minute shoppers with big purchases will mean the store stays open later next year. It's not entirely the customer's fault but the workers have every right to be pissed at them.

No. 703351

>>703120
>>703016
she's right, why shit on customers when you can shit on your employer… it's not customers who decide what day you'll work

No. 704019

File: 1609157279163.jpg (Spoiler Image, 79.58 KB, 960x653, please rope.jpg)

why is it always the furries getting caught being pedos/zoophiles/zoosadists
(no gore or blood but spoilered because not all people might like to see some autist put a knife to a dog's neck)

No. 704021

File: 1609157436430.jpg (110.36 KB, 716x705, please rope 2.jpg)

>>704019
reposted because i accidentally spoilered it. also for context the kid is allegedly 17 and is dating a 10 year old

No. 704026

>>704019
>27 jun
is the dog ok? please tell me she's ok

No. 704030

>>704026
this kid has been doxxed to the high heavens and the dog allegedly has been taken away by his family and donated to a shelter. No concrete evidence though, maybe the kiwifarms zoosadist thread caught wind long before us and has proof of the dog's safety. he needs therapy and his internet cut from him FAST

No. 704041

>>704019
This is the same kind of person who can't stop complaining about anime girls having big eyes or something.

No. 704166

>>704019
this is probably someone who got groomed and abused and is continuing the cycle on innocent creatures. Many such stories in the furry fandom

No. 704694

File: 1609238557887.png (91.82 KB, 658x878, lol.png)

>groomed online
check
>coomer tranny
check
>passing off sexting with adult men as a minor as safe
check

No. 704700

>>704019
Actually almost made me throw up. Furries in general should be gassed but zoosadists deserve something way worse.

>>704166
Wouldn't be surprised if this was the case (which it probably is). From what I've observed furries have an actual big, scene-wide problem with grooming young teenagers into their fetish lifestyles and drug usage by acting like they're the "wholesome big siblings with the fun colourful animal avatars". The amount of 14-year old ABDL furries I've seen is staggering and those kids absolutely did not come up with that fetish on their own. They always try to hide their tracks by being "concerned" about menial things like >>704041 mentioned while offering hard drugs and dick pics to minors waiting for them to turn 18 so they can join their bdsm furry polycule.

>>704694
What the fuck is this freak's problem?
>idk what's all this talk about rape and sexual assault I've enjoyed all the times I've experienced it!!!
Literal coomer troon brain at work.

No. 705656

File: 1609368563948.jpg (262.04 KB, 747x900, saBOAkG.jpg)

I love when Twitter users overthink even the most mundane thing. This doesn't compare to the "As aN ItaLiAn AmEriCan, AmOnG uS Is a MaFiA MoCKerY" But it get pretty close.

No. 705662

>>705656
>ergo
Why isn’t Twitter reducing the character limit? We don’t need people making up some random sociological analysis about Tetris and using words that should only be used on a thesis to sound less retarded.

No. 705955

File: 1609426999129.png (22.23 KB, 258x43, take meds.png)

>>705656
Those tweets are literal schizo tier, holy shit

No. 705974

File: 1609428356328.jpeg (443.11 KB, 1170x2138, A7D5BC10-DF1D-4C09-802E-C021C9…)

SJW twitter really writes long ass threads about the most irrelevant shit https://twitter.com/weiweiwrites/status/1343842527263092736?s=21

No. 706006

File: 1609431800687.jpeg (62.16 KB, 500x559, 78907DE3-516A-40CA-97BD-7094E7…)


No. 706029

>>705974
when will languagelets learn?

No. 706064

>>705974
Jesus christ, being a polyglot is problematic nowadays as long as you're white. It just amazes me that these people truly find the negatives to anything. People interested in languages are always encouraged by their peers to research on the history and culture of the country, it's basically the norm

No. 706193

>>705974
Not trying to racebait, as I'm not American, but why do Asian American seem so fucking insecure and obnoxious? Try actually being shat on constantly and being denied housing and job opportunities for your race before complaining about respectful weebs learning a language at school or during their free time. They only ever complain about small things that aren't even bad enough to qualify as microaggressions or whatever.

No. 706271

File: 1609460068712.jpeg (407.74 KB, 828x1051, EB521121-3057-40DB-934A-0B3C8A…)

SJWs nitpicking Wonder Woman 1984 for not “accurately representing” every fucking ethnic group on the planet.

Oh and some BS about Gal Gadot being an evil Israeli military shill sprinkled in for good measure…

https://twitter.com/spiderswarz/status/1343625060578439168?s=20

No. 706278

>>705974
> Be 2nd gen asian
> Grow up mostly around white people
> No real roots in parent's culture
> Can't speak to grandparents
> Parents lament how American you are
> Spot a twitter whitey that knows more than you do
> Insecurity and embarrassment bubble up inside
> Must tear whitey down

These are the people who make these kinds of posts tbh

No. 706296

>>706271
When will english speaking people stop using the word "mena" for anyone and anything? How are you complaining about racism and conflating a huge number of different countries and ethnicities regardless of context? I haven't watched this movie but I'm gonna guess there were middle eastern characters and no north african characters? As usual?

No. 706460

>>706193
It's usually either 2nd gen SEA immigrants who are insecure about not being one of the "cool Asians" or Chinese kids who got ostracized by the mainland branch at family gatherings for not being fluent in Chinese. The latter ones know they're the "American cousin" for the rest of the family so they spend their time making angry Youtube videos about "white ppl" liking Mulan to cope with it. And once in a while you come across a well-off Taiwanese who just drank the college SJW discourse kool aid.

>>706278
Yeah exactly this. Asian parents can get so bitter about their kids speaking English better than their own language and create this huge issue with insecurity.

No. 706983

File: 1609571199904.jpg (78.73 KB, 828x708, BeLYeWS.jpg)

I know that the Smash community has its problems, but it looks like if this person is just bringing up "Pedophilia" to cope for being bad at the game.

No. 706990

File: 1609571943722.jpg (279.53 KB, 841x630, for_you.jpg)

>>706983
this is insane, like every college has a smash club. so many normies play that game. as usual, this person needs to log off. definitely a cope.

reposting to add, what even is the correlation between "pedophile" and the rest of the tweet? This person is deranged. it's like they're using it as a generic insult a la "retard." Guess that is what happens in a community of gen Zs flinging pedo accusations all day, I wonder if it will become like "retard" on twitter

No. 706994

>>706990
The competitive Smash community along with the rest of the gaming community had a huge MeToo moment this past summer where many pedophiles and sexual harassers were exposed, with a lot of the pedos coming from the Smash scene, so that’s probably where they got the association. Some people also think that since Smash is seen as a more childish game then only total freaks would want to play it competitively. Honestly though whoever tweeted that just spends too much time online and doesn’t realize that many normal people enjoy playing Smash casually.

No. 706997

>>706271
Isn't the point of this film to be something that "would be done in the 80s"? Kind of like to show Americans how silly the American perspective is? Though I don't find it surprising that something like this is too hard to get for a modern internet user.

No. 707000

>>706983
>trans flag
Opinion automatically discarded lol.

No. 707018

>>706983
Guys i have smash but it's uninstalled on my switch what does this mean??? should i sign up to become a 4chan janny?

No. 707616

File: 1609690293180.jpg (Spoiler Image, 809.58 KB, 598x3448, broitsbeans.jpg)

I'm putting it as a spoiler image cause the image is long. This thread is blowing up this morning. Some fucking weirdo would not help his daughter with opening a can of beans, wax poetics and tires to make it into a story of self reliance and people are annoyed with him.

No. 707620

>>707616
This is by no means child abuse like people are claiming but the dad's a weirdo nevertheless. It's great that he's encouraging his kid to get over their frustration and try until they figure it out but he made the story way too dramatic for its own good, he could've just said "I let my 9-year old daughter figure out how to use a can opener by herself and she finally did it, now she's so overjoyed she just wants to keep opening cans" and nobody would've had a problem with it.

No. 707621

>>707616
every day i grow more and more grateful for my parents. i could not imagine letting a man this insufferable put a child in me

No. 707624

>>707616
I don't understand why he thought it was okay to make her try opening the can for 6 hours. Like you said, it's good to let kids figure shit out on their own, but after 30 mins-1 hour at least give her a hint or ya'know, just teach her how to open the fucking can like a regular parent. This whole "You need to do this completely on your own and I will not help you at all" thing is probably gonna end up hurting the daughter once she tries to do stuff like cooking. I also hope he wasn't using words like "spatial/sideways orientation" to explain opening a can to a 9 year old.

No. 707633

>>707616
He sounds autistic.

No. 707646

>>707616
I think he lied about the six hours so he could have a "better" story. But god does he sound insuferable.

No. 707652

>>707616
>absolute knob won't open a can of baked beans for his child to eat
>tells her that neither of them will be eating anything until she gets the can open
>refuses to show her how to use the can opener, just keeps telling her to go over how its parts work like she's in some kid's adventure book and has to figure out how to get through a magical lock and free a pack of elves using a stolen witch's key
>he lets her struggle for six hours with this
>after she finally manages to get it open, he proceeds to write a gay little novella on Twitter about how it was a learning experience for her and a teachable moment, basically congratulating himself for fuck-all
Ban all boomers from Twitter.

No. 707659

>>707616
I could not think of a more stupid thing for thousands of idiots to be obsessed over if I was given six hours. Fuck I hate twitter so much.

No. 707664

>>707659
I don't get why he couldn't just open a video on how to use a can opener for her.

No. 707667

>>707646
Yeah I'm pretty sure a lot of that story has been exaggerated for drama. The kid probably continuously stopped and went to do something else and then came back to it.

No. 707706

>>707664
What an insufferable snotbag. Imagine knowing that your child is hungry and letting her wait six hours for baked beans. He could have just explained the parts to her, showed her how to use it and thrown in a few "there are no superfluous parts" if he need to satiate his need to flex on a child.

She didn't have a "lack of perseverance" - the kid tried for hours! She had a lack of education, which he could have given her at any time. She would still have developed the understanding and the skill, but in roughly 5 and a half less hours.

No. 707717

>>707706

He seems to have confused powertripping with parenting. He should become a teacher.

No. 707725

File: 1609700694973.png (34.94 KB, 582x291, apocalypse.PNG)

>>707616
He's trying so hard to excuse his behavior. It wasn't like his daughter had ate before trying to open the baked beans, she was already hungry when she started trying to open the can so clearly the time between meals was already up. He could've easily just made her something else to eat while she tried to open the can instead depriving her of food for 6 hours and using her hunger as "motivation". What a shitty father.

No. 707734

>>707659
I know this is the twitter hate thread, but this clearly isn't just a twitter thing, literally most anons here are pointing out how bad this was. The guy is just a retarded dad. You don't have to be opposed to everything just because it's twitter.

No. 707751

>>707616
I'm not reading all of this, but this guy and many other people on this shithole of a website should just use wordpress instead of writing huge essays in the worst format possible.

No. 707769

>>707616
I don't think there's anything wrong with making your kid exercise their brain and figure things out on their own, but the absolute mental illness and narcissism of thinking it necessary to post 30+ tweets about opening a can is just-

No. 707772

>>707633
my thoughts exactly, I was expecting anons to post screencaps of him talking about his autism. imagine playing with puzzles when your kid is starving

No. 707793

>>707751
I miss when the concept of twitter was stuffing one whole thought into one tweet. We went down a hellhole when people started replying to themselves to add more on.

No. 707863

>>653006
is no one going to mention that this is a selfpost?

No. 707896

>>707863
LMAO, good catch

No. 707982

>>707616
>>707725
Lol did he delete his twitter?

No. 708132

>>707616
>>707725
>In 2021, Roderick attracted controversy after posting a Twitter thread that went viral about preventing his 9-year-old daughter from eating until she learned to use a can opener.[18][19] The incident caused controversial past tweets to resurface in which Roderick used antisemitic language, the n-word, rape jokes, and pejoratives.[20] Some, such as Ken Jennings and Michael Ian Black, defended Roderick, the latter writing that "old tweets are obviously jokes, not proof of any abhorrent beliefs".[20][21] As his tweets continued to go viral, many users on Twitter began to refer to Roderick by the nickname "Bean Dad".[22] By January 3, 2021, his Twitter account had been deleted.[23][24] Following the controversy the podcast My Brother, My Brother and Me announced it would no longer be using Roderick's music on the show.[24]
lel

No. 708151

>>708132

The irony is that this kind of self-destruction makes me feel twitter has a place in society after all.

No. 709281

File: 1609943516607.jpeg (87.54 KB, 828x314, B79D2E3D-2A05-4340-BAC8-6DC5F9…)

the comments under this tweet are a dumpster fire. so much narcissism, entitlement and self-pitying over nothing.

https://twitter.com/preciousdaangel/status/1346293119915069440?s=21

No. 709286

>>706983
>anime girl avatar
It's every time.

No. 709289

>>709281
I wish I had that many little things going on in my life to worry about how some people are "invalidating" me on social media. w t f

No. 709310

File: 1609947006259.jpeg (172.53 KB, 518x913, EDC354C2-F023-40E8-A881-06C318…)

>>709281
The comments… I don’t understand. Didn’t the whole “gay smol nb bean uwu” baby talk start with people writing that shit in their bios? People trying to parrot it back to them and they get attacked kek.

> THE WHOLE THING WITH NOT BEING CISGENDER IS TO NOT LAY DOWN AND ACCEPT THE SHIT THAT YOURE NOT COMFORTABLE WITH. AND THAT INCLUDES GENDER STEREOTYPES

Nah that’s called feminism.

> I WILL FUCK YOUR DAD

These people are seriously unhinged.

No. 709320

>>709310
>not being cisgender defies gender stereotypes
tomboys and butches are dying out in favor of them literally feeling pressured and so uncomfortable with their femininity that they feel like they have to become "enbies" or transmen, how is that not reinforcement of female stereotypes that you can't even be a non stereotypical female anymore without assumption that you must troon out

No. 709330

>>709281
>>709310

>please, special treatment uwu

>no no, not THAT special

No. 709354

>>709310
> I WILL FUCK YOUR DAD
I see camgirls screaming this on twitter too… is the ability to bed middle aged men meant to be a special power to these people?

No. 709395

>>709310
How the turns have tabled, now they’re mad because they’re buried in the hole they made for themselves, didn’t enbies and the other gender special wanted to be the smol baby uwu owo beanie bean beens they kept pushing down people’s throats?
I wonder what was the thing that actually triggered them enough to complain about the baby talk.

No. 709398

>>709395
>I wonder what was the thing that actually triggered them enough to complain about the baby talk.
Not enough asspats.

No. 709399

>>709354

It is a very mature thing to say.

No. 709432

>>709395
I guess people talked to them like they were special needs which is not the kind of babying they wanted.

No. 709654

File: 1610004798452.jpg (135.32 KB, 1080x809, Screenshot_20210107-081409_Twi…)

I always cringe when I see this type of post on twitter "something bad is happening in america rn so white people should give us free money"

No. 709658

>>709654
I kinda understand at least where they're coming from when its BLM related but like literally why do woke twitter poc think every negative political event only affects them.

No. 709659

>>709654
We’re living through a pandemic, most of the world is suffering the direct and indirect consequences of that. Of course people need to distract themselves, it’s really not some white privilege thing kek.

No. 709663

>>709658
What is giving money to some rando on Twitter going to accomplish? How does this fight racial inequality?

No. 709669

>>709654
They will always find a way to beg for guilt tripping money, don't they?

No. 709693

>>709654
I can't stand these insufferable gen z twitter e-beggars. Random ass people do not owe you money for any reason. Imagine being so entitled you demand strangers send you money for absolutely nothing, in a pandemic on top of that. madness luv

No. 709702

>>709693

Gen z are going to be a horrid grown up generation because they’ll have been kids throughout what’s happening currently and they’ll be enforcing their socialist bullshit on everyone. Pretending there’s all these genders and god knows what else. This is only the start of the year - I dread to think what will happen next.

No. 709732

>>650465
It always goes back to if it makes money it s GOOD. Its funny how the "left wing" of twitter are still right wing in many ways lol

No. 709736

>>653295
nothing about sonic is as bad as twitter and people seem to forget chris fag was a pokemon fan too lmao

No. 709742


No. 709768

File: 1610029092485.jpeg (216.29 KB, 828x731, 0335717D-995B-4560-9101-04B9F9…)

>the likes and retweets

these people lack empathy to the point where they’d rather enclose themselves in an echo chamber and demonize anyone with conflicting views than have their black-and-white worldview challenged, because it’s easier to view everyone else as ebul villains than acknowledge the fact that the world isn’t divided into perfect morally upright heroes and cackling mustache-twirling bigots.

they’re like elementary-schoolers.

No. 709771

>>709768
It's the autism.

No. 709790

>>709768
Thankfully most of them will grow out of that black and white thinking once their brains have finished developing and they've got some more life experience

No. 709791

>>709768
If you don't share political views then what the fuck do you have in common? Don't say interests because people like you are not friendly with people even if you have common interests.

No. 709794

>>709768
Hard agree. I could never be friends with someone who has opposing political views as me. I can hold a conversation with a stranger with opposing views just fine, but once it bleeds into my personal life, I'm out.

No. 709796

>>709791
i barely ever talk about politics with my friends and if we do there is surely something to be disagreed upon. how do you go through life thinking politics is the be all and end all of relationships?

No. 709797

>>709768
Obviously you can be friends with people who have different political views, but it's ok to not want to be friends with people who's political views are against "your" people.

No. 709803

>>709791
>people like you
what does this even mean anon? You don't know their political opinions, they could align with yours entirely and yet you've written them off because they think people with different political opinions can be friends? I agree with them entirely, I have many friends with different social, economic and political opinions, why would I drop people who are good to me and reliable because they don't conform to whatever I think is right. That's an extremely childish worldview.

No. 709864

>>709768
I don't see what is completely wrong with this tweet. I would rather not get friendly with super right wing people because I would rather not associate with those types of people and there would be too much clashing between us. For some, conflicting politics may mean nothing but I'm sure you can see why certain demographics would overwhelmingly avoid Trump supporters.

No. 709885

>>709797
Isn't it more like "don't be friends with racists/homophobes" or whatever then?

No. 709896

>>709885
Sometimes people with certain political views tend to be racist/homophobic. Also whoever they support could spew racist/homophobic shit.


Imo, it's pretty clear that tweet and tweets like that aren't talking about minor differences in opinions, like some anons here are acting like it does, but shit like a poc being friends with Trump supporters. Idk about you guys, but I would never want to be friends with people who support stuff that's against people like me. Anyway, no one is obligated to be friends with people they don't want to be friends with anyway. We all have ways of deciding who we want to associate with.

No. 709897

>>709768
so many of these viral clapback tweets are pure fanfiction I'm surprised anyone enjoys them tbh. yes sis, literally invent a scenario in your head you can pretend to be stressed over for what? some twitter points

No. 709899

>>709896
I know that, but that still doesn't necessarily boil down to political beliefs themselves. There are apolitical people who are racists/homophobes, it's not just about political differences, and I don't know why these people don't highlight THAT.
>Imo, it's pretty clear that tweet and tweets like that aren't talking about minor differences in opinions, like some anons here are acting like it does, but shit like a poc being friends with Trump supporters.
I actually interpreted it the other way which is why I gave the input I did. I completely agree with you about Trump supporters and radical right extremists, and also agree that you don't have to be friends with anyone you don't want to.

No. 709909

>>709768
It must suck being so unable to form meaningful relationships with others over political views.
But if the icon had a MAGA cap, everyone would flip their shit.
Good news! You can make friends even if they have different political views as long as they’re not assholes, it’s possible because most humans have personalities other than whatever they think about politics

No. 709925

>>709909
I really do not think people like in that tweet would be mad a Trump fanclub member does not want to be friends with them lol

No. 709982

>>709803
>what does this even mean anon?
People who are in a position where they can not be bothered by anyone's political views because they don't affect them (negatively). The rest of us are wary because you can't have certain political views without hating certain demographics. So it's easy to say "nazis are people too and they're nice" like no shit, they are nice to you.

No. 709987

>>709982
but there's a huge space inbetween the extreme left and right. The OG post didn't mention racism, classism or stances of extreme prejudice. Of course nobody is saying be friends with literal Nazi's, and of course certain groups you'll might want to avoid, but having a difference in political views doesn't mean you should surround yourself with completely likeminded people. If anything, for your own self-interest, it's good to have people in your life that challenge your world view.

No. 709994

>>709987
Well I'm in such a corner that even moderates hate me so you're still suggesting I give a chance to people that hate me.

No. 710080

File: 1610068108180.png (41.94 KB, 602x241, twitt.png)

Do you get thrown out of commie twitter if you're not a tranny or something?

No. 710081

>>710080
If you're nonbinary or are with a nonbinary person you basically should not idenfity as anything but pan since to be a lesbian you'd have to be on the gender binary and date someone on the gender binary… Their own labels clash so much lol

No. 710142

>>710081
Kek, apparently they are trying to erase that.

There's this one time, an it/its person on Tumblr made a post complaining, ending with a "-A lesbian". A girl commented to OP on a sort of mocking manner, staring the post with "Girl" as a way to call OP. And OP got into a breakdown saying "Girl is a binary term, lesbian isn't, read about it"

No. 710236

File: 1610098599871.png (86.28 KB, 672x896, crybaby3.png)

Some kid tried to slander a genshin impact voice actor because he happened to like "incest" ship art of two male characters. A bunch of shit got thrown at him and he got harassed and called a pedophile and now people are trying to backpedal hard. Seriously, why is this shit allowed. Not only is the kid supremely retarded but also could have gotten sued over it.

No. 710241

>>710236
Twitter is basically lord of the flies at this point. Letting minors use social media was a mistake nobody can fix.

No. 710243

>>710142
what does lesbian even mean to these people? either it's (people who identify as) women attracted to (people who identify as) women, which in this case means that enbies are excluded, or biological female (regardless of gender identity) attracted to biological females (regardless of gender identity), which would indeed include (bio female) enbies, but exclude transbians, and obviously this person would never exclude the benis owners. you can't have it both ways and still have a coherent definition…

No. 710315

>>709994
same anon i feel exactly like you

No. 710318

>>709994
get off your victim complex, good Christ.

No. 710327

>>710318
nta but easy to say its a victim complex when youre the main person the internet constantly caters and makes their narrative around to

No. 710361

>>710241
>minors
They never grow up though

No. 710399

>>709994
>>710315
So edgy to alienate everyone around you and blame them for "hating" you - what are you some sort of pedo tranny furry monarchist? You can find common ground with normies and moderates if you're not an absolute sperg.

No. 710419

>>710236
The zinger is that it's not even an incest ship, they're "sworn brothers" which got mistranslated from the Chinese term.

No. 710444

>>710399
Considering how limited the actual internet is compared to real life its not hard to think most people online are against your beliefs. Its retarded how people like you who are chronically online can only jump into conculusions about obscure online personalities because you think only 3 types of people exist

No. 710470

>>710399
I'm not any of those things but I don't get why it's so hard to understand that some things are universally hated. I don't think it should be, but, you know. And the funny thing is that even people who pretend not to hate us have a bias despite their "nice" politics.