File: 1673346972139.jpg (2.03 MB, 3264x2448, Angry_Cow,_Slovenia_(289344104…)
No. 1468847
>>1468811Eating disorders can happen to anyone regardless of social class or financial success.
Plastic surgery mishaps really only happen to a niche category of the financially well-off who simply choose not to allocate any of that funding to their mental wellness in spite of having access to the resources and knowhow. It's definitely more of a choice and unlike a mental disorder, would be 100% preventable if the party who operates on them would tell them "No." Many plastic "surgeons" are really just glorified butchers and give off many red flags, but vanity addicts just don't care.
When regulated, these privileged people just fly to a third world or cheap asian country to get their fixes. It's rich people making poor choices and suffering the consequences.
No. 1468852
>>1468847A huge amount of people who have plastic surgery get loans to do it or save up for years.
>the financially well-off who simply choose not to allocate any of that funding to their mental wellness in spite of having access to the resources and knowhowHow about the binge eaters/bulimics who spend $40 a day on food? Or steal to feed their food addiction? Are they greedy, bad people?
No. 1469208
>>1469191Only three things cause mental disorders.
1. Trauma, you suffer and your mind copes
2. Genetics, you can physically inherit trauma
3. Lack of basic needs, if you don't reach your hierarchy of needs you will suffer
Fix that and fix the problem, but most will never get it treated at all
No. 1471354
>>1470876This is just a fact. Men love borderline
abusive women because they know they ain't shit. This is why pick mes never prosper with any man. In the eyes of a man, if you love him you're just as shit as he is and why would he want that?
No. 1471475
>>1471472i mean yeah, as long as women are being socialised with moids after high school (or even in friendship groups outside of school) you can't stop this kind of behaviour. im the ayrt and i can only speak for myself, but going to an all girls high school definitely placed less pressure on me to feel like i had to change myself in any way to get male attention. i was miserable in other ways lmao, but one thing i didnt have to worry about was boys, and im grateful for that.
it was kind of a shock, actually, coming from a same sex environment where we were only interacting with at most a few male teachers, to having to interact with guys my own age and quickly realising just how shitty they were
No. 1471838
File: 1673627491122.jpg (45.46 KB, 400x500, tumblr_e61a95a8d4a5018ac069653…)
I will admit it, because everyone in the celebricow thread fawns over her so I feel its unpopular. I think Anya Taylor-Joy is unattractive. I genuinely don't understand how anyone can find her pretty but different tastes and all that. She just looks like a little kid in the face so I find it off-putting. Some nonnie said she looks like grimes and I see it. Like a mix of grimes and michael jackson unironically.
pic unrel Milla has been my girlcrush since I was a little girl and saw her in the fifth element.
No. 1471927
>>1471846Idk I want to agree but I also feel bad for the women who look naturally infantile, is everyone interested in them suspicious? Not trying to argue just need clarification or something
>>1471862Yeah usually it's easy to ignore but Anya is one I don't get at all.
Based anons who also appreciate Milla, thank you.
No. 1471946
>>1471940Nah, she has a history of saying racially insensitive things. She sported a bindi back in the 90s. People dont forget. also, she's 53? (i believe) so she's too old for this shit. she's just a privileged white bitch who is now married to a country singer, but she's always been
problematic af.
No. 1471956
File: 1673634949543.png (36.36 KB, 741x160, allure.png)
>>1471947>>1471946Have you read the interview? It's obvious she wasn't trying to say she's transrace kek, she just connects with some of the cultural aspects. It wasn't a literal statement.
No. 1471965
>>1471958I'm sure this
>>1471946 person bringing up her age and saying she's privileged and
pRobLeMatic is not older than 20.
No. 1471977
File: 1673635731365.jpg (109.51 KB, 1200x800, bape-101-3.jpg)
>>1471971Nta and I agree that it's embarrassing, I just find it a little silly that people would describe that behavior as "
problematic af".
It's goofy, but put in the context of lates 90s/early 2000s where the Japanese did the same with american music and fashion and it stops being so out of place.
No. 1472530
File: 1673661644480.jpeg (84.19 KB, 640x1420, A758711D-746F-4960-A1CC-C65B02…)
I think “brewery culture” has made parents WAY too comfortable with taking their kids to bars. Last time I went to a brewery, I met up with friends for a board game night on a Wednesday evening, and around 9pm during a crazy round of a game, my friend was losing and laughed, “Oh, no!! Oh, fuck!!” Then we heard a loud exaggerated GASP from behind us, and there was a couple sitting at a table with FOUR kids, including a baby, a toddler, and 2 older kids around age 6 or 7. I mean come on, I know parents deserve to have social lives too, but what are you doing with your little kids out at 9 pm on a weeknight anyway? At a brewery that doesn’t even serve food! It’s a loud place with drunk people, you’re bound to hear people swearing.
No. 1472541
>>1472530Yeah that's infuriating. You'd think they'd at least be the kind of parents who don't care about swesring around kids.
I remember going to a 24hr pancake restaurant at 3am once, dusty as, and seething about the fact there were crying children there.
No. 1472723
>>1472720Samefag just adding "
problematic af" in the same vein
No. 1472764
>>1472758I can’t stand these attempts to normalize mental illness given that mentally ill males abuse and kill women at an extremely high rate.
Also whenever someone whines about evil psychiatrists it’s clear that they’re just a mentally ill coping and seething.
No. 1472779
File: 1673689221664.png (125.78 KB, 265x257, 1470202011359.png)
School is terrible. It teaches kids to act like robots and normal behavior is punished. You're not even safe in school. If it weren't for school I wouldn't have been mercilessly bullied for having a physical health issue that made me look a bit smaller than everyone else, I wouldn't have to deal with issues when peeing to this day from being forced to hold it in until recess, I wouldn't have horrible anxiety from getting my period to this day from the many times I had to walk all over high school with massive blood stains on my clothes because again, recess, I wouldn't have had to deal with racism at 6 years old from fucking teachers themselves, I wouldn't have had to spend my university years adjusting to normal social interactions because of retarded hierarchy between teachers and students, etc. I would have turned into a normal, well-adjusted normie. I wouldn't have been forced to learn the most useless shit ever and go back home at 6pm everyday while not even having enough free time to do my homework and do anything else on the side. Same deal with friends of mine who went through equally retarded shit. Being forced to have completely useless classes like music classes, art classes, "technology" classes sports classes is a huge waste of time and energy. And for some reason the creepiest, borderline pedophilic teachers are almost always sports teachers. Don't even get me started on shit like teachers being dangerous themselves, bullying kids themselves, or endangering them, years ago one of them forced kids in a high school very close to my place to ski in a forbidden, dangerous area and they all died from an avalanche… except the sports teacher! Why? Because you're told to always blindly listen to teachers no matter what. And teachers telling kids that good grades mean they'll have a good job and a good salary until they're 18 years old should be beaten to death publicly. School is a scam and the few positive aspects of it are so badly implemented it's laughable.
>>1470876That's what they want in theory but not in practice.
No. 1472790
>>1472758Nta but yeah I'm not denying meds can help schizos. But in my case, I will never trust the industry again after pumping me with
all kinds of drugs since I was 12 and
nothing ever helping me for my autism, depression and anxiety kek. Therapy didn't work either. They weren't even able to properly diagnose me despite knowing me since I was 11 and suggesting, besides depression and anxiety, that I had RAD and schizotypal personality disorder and all kinds of shit, only in my mid 20s I was diagnosed with autism. So yeah, fuck them, I wasted years on therapy and money on meds that never worked
No. 1473106
>>1473081it's interesting actually: ive definitely noticed a trend with gen z being more critical of pregnancy and the cultural norms behind having children, but equally ive seen absolutely bizarre discourse about how telling poor people not to have kids is abliest, classist etc. its like we take one step forward and two steps back.
and i follow a vegan youtuber who talks in depth about animal ethics and overall has very good arguments, but then she treats antinatalism like this bizarre misanthropic fringe movement? despite the fact that veganism and antinatalism both share a lot of the same underlying principles. and she has 3 kids lmao
>>1473084absolutely. i can't imagine what it would be like to be born today and grow up in the following decades, seeing things get progressively worse and worse
No. 1473161
>>1473133>>1473130i love you guys
>>1473109thanks
nonny, im going to check him out properly when i get a chance! you're right that he seems very hlackpilled but im still interested to hear his takes. i think sometimes you need to have a healthy degree of pessimism to be able to discuss these things realistically
>>1473134i honestly wonder where this mindset comes from, it's seems so anachronistic. im sure smarter people than me have analysed the social trends behind neoconservative and the resurgence of traditional values but it's really sad seeing 19, 20 year old women talk about wanting to marry and have a large family in their early 20s
No. 1473369
>>1473319 When I was younger I was "typically BPD" (17-20) and I can see how that would be the diagnosis I was given. However, as an adult looking back, all signs of trauma were ignored, and they were never explored. My home environment was never taken seriously bc there was an assumption that I "took it the wrong way", or that I have a distorted perception of events, which further gaslights traumatised women into having less of a voice. The more I insisted, the less I was taken seriously. All that to say I now don't meet the criteria for it, and I still have yet to get any trauma therapy. Often times, BPD treatment goes as far as stopping self injurious behaviours and crisis, it rarely explores the reasons why a woman (and a young woman at that) would behave in this way in the first place. But it's long, expensive and extensive to tackle trauma and DBT is "cost effective" which has seemingly translated to no self harm = no more BPD.
No. 1473418
>>1473319First they thought my mother was schizophrenic and later they slapped the BPD label on her, but there's no point to just DBT if nobody bothers to deal with her underlying trauma or make sure she's in a safe environment. The only thing they've ever done is either put her on heavy ass meds (without putting her in rehab for alcoholism first), assume responsibility would magically fix her or that becoming a mother would've fixed her.
In general the way they treated her is to me a symbol for how people have tried to cover up the horrible shit that happened to kids in the 60's and 70's as part of the whole being more "open minded" stuff. She didn't even know what her family did to her wasn't okay until she was fucking 40 and it weren't the mental health professionals actually helping her figure that out.
No. 1473532
>>1473477It's not just that, the term was used to promote the whole "hoe era/dick appointment" thing that girls and women have fallen for.
Minor blogpost, but I was teased in school in the late 2000s and called frigid because I was shy and fearful of boys my age. They give you that label when you're a girl who doesn't look or act like the women they see in porn aka a hypersexual and readily available cool girl.
The catch is, if you actually stop being "frigid" they will just call you a slut after they've got what they wanted. I don't think it's about being bad at sex, I think it's a very manipulative tactic to shame us for being naturally wary around males and then shaming us when we feel pressured to conform to pornsick standards.
No. 1473567
File: 1673793517124.jpg (15.13 KB, 273x320, 1669914713142201.jpg)
Women get trafficked, sex trafficked, get abused and murdered daily, are victims of domestic abuse, are forced into unwanted pregnancies, forced into arranged marriages, are denied basic human rights, are mutilated thanks to FGM, are called whores and denied opportunities simply because they exist. I'm so fucking angry at the way women are treated, it shatters my heart and whenever I see statistics my heart sinks. What my unpopular opinion is that all of it seems to get ignored. I don't want it to come off as bait, I'm being genuine, but all this troon bullshit, lesbian erasure, female representation on some shit blockbuster movie etc. feels so performative. I've worked with abused women and the stories they have to tell, jfc. I don't want people to focus on some irrelevant 'problems' while real women, in real time, are being trafficked to some brothels in urban Amsterdam to be raped daily. All of this performative radfem bullshit feels like… well, bullshit. I just can't wrap my head around why one would focus on some random drag queens 'erasing' women when places like Australia have seen a massive increase in FGM. Again, I swear to God I'm not baiting (or a troon for that matter), I'm just genuinely upset that people focus on such small things instead of paying attention to actual, horrific things that women have to suffer through. Take FIFA for example, why weren't the moids that attended it crucified and publicly shamed? Qatar is a country that blames women for rape, and even jails them for that. How is that level of misogyny allowed and not condoned left and right? Why aren't stories of female trafficking survivors taught in schools? Why aren't people taught about FGM? Honestly the only big-scale problem that I can think of that's being properly addressed are incels. Even then, there could be so much more done.
I'm not expecting anything to improve in this department, I really don't. I'm just so fucking mad that all of these issues are seemingly unimportant to the general public. Instead we get fear mongering about some faggots, what the actual hell. I've done some volunteering to help disadvantaged women and women that have been exploited in horrific ways and the fact that no one seems to give a shit just infuriates me. I don't want to hear about this or that politicians love affair, I don't care about the new it couple in Hollywood, I don't care that some sportsman got kicked out of his team. I want real, wide-spread conversation about massive issues that women face. I want statistics being taught at schools, I want women who survived to be heard, I want real action to do SOMETHING, honestly ANYTHING to at the very least spread the word and information.
Sorry for the long rant but I'm fuming, women deserve so much more and the way they're treated is utterly horrific. I'm just so mad and I know there's nothing I can do to realistically change anything aside from helping individuals.
No. 1473570
>>1473567the work you do for fellow nonnies is enough. do not be so hard on yourself
nonny. being a woman in a woman hating society is tough.andrew tate being popular is testament to how vapid moids are , i caught my brother watching him and it made me mad to no end .hes autistic so i know he can be fooled easily . fuck moids , fuck moids like andrew
No. 1474255
>>1473567I feel you sis. Women are a uniquely oppressed class and it's completely normalized because our lives are deeply, inextricably linked with our oppressors and our connection with them is glorified as the ultimate joy in a woman's life. Men benefit more on a personal level from subjugating women than they do other groups and they absolutely cannot let us realize how bad it is. Men don't even realize it themselves, they've convinced themselves they're
victims and women are the cruel, evil ones. It's horrific.
No. 1474291
File: 1673852914872.png (1.73 MB, 1218x637, AE792393-008D-4520-B124-CB579B…)
I think online criticism of creators like picrel is really bitter and spergy and just autismos getting angry that other autismos are actually able to use their autism for something instead of just bitching on Reddit all day.
No. 1474313
File: 1673855863166.jpeg (92.98 KB, 340x372, D5CFE37B-F784-4795-9C56-AEB39C…)
I know this gonna get me killed but having a cat is like being in an abusive relationship. I would know because I’ve been abused since I was a toddler.
I recently acquired a kitten that was meowing outside my window during a cold winter storm and I let him in. I’ve been taking care of him feeding him fancy cat food, cleaning his litter box after every usage, playing with him, and giving him affection when he asks for it and I’m baffled because in return I get bitten and scratched. From my understanding it’s playful bites and paw swattings. Like if I stop petting him he claws at me to coax me back to petting him. He bites me in my sleep, he knocks stuff over constantly, and puts himself in precarious situations I have to quickly rescue him from or he’ll get hurt.
Despite all that I still love him a lot. He falls asleep on me and I don’t wanna move because he looks so peaceful. Every time he’s curious about what I’m eating I let him sniff. When I go to the bathroom he starts meowing at the door and swatting his paw underneath the door because he misses me.
I don’t expect him to love me back or anything but this whole dynamic is so familiar lmao I bend over backwards for him for a scrap of affection.
No. 1474425
File: 1673874305416.jpg (13.43 KB, 201x251, Download.jpg)
Brussel sprouts taste best boiled. You don't need to marinade and char the fuck out of them, it makes them chewy and doesn't even improve the taste all that much. They have the best texture when boiled or steamed and taste perfectly fine.
No. 1474553
>>1474460nta You have to use cat logic and work with them. Why do they want to be on the kitchen counters? Maybe they like watching you cook? Okay so give them a place they can sit so they can watch you while you're in the kitchen. Cat is scratching your couch? That's because you're there often and he wants to mark where you are. Getting a scratching post in a different corner in the room doesn't dissuade them, it would have to be in the same area as where the scratching happens. There are no bad cats really, just misunderstood. People either expect them to act like dogs or like Sims animals or even humans (acting like cats create elaborate revenge plans). Cat is causing a ruckus at night? You need a play-eat-sleep rhythm for them and depending on the type they might need way more exercise than expected. Cat bites while playing? Do you let them play with your hands? Teaches bad habits. Do they have enough other toys? Are they teething?
As long as the cat is using normal cat logic, it's usually the human who needs training, not the cat. They're not being bad, they're being cats or they're traumatized or have (mental) health issues. If they aren't using normal cat logic, they're either traumatized and need help for that or haven't been enough around other cats and were probably not in their litter long enough to learn how to "cat" properly. Which they can still learn from older cats later.
No. 1474751
>>1473567I agree
nonnie. I think the biggest reason why it's ignored it means we have to hold all men accountable. All these nasty things that happen to women is their fault, even the so called good ones and nigels contribute to this in their own little way with their constant deflection and porn consumption. All those other things like lesbian erasure, troonery will resolve itself imo and the reason why radfems focus on it so much is probably because it feels like such an easy victory. The conversation about how men constantly destroy women's lives constantly gets flipped around to "not all" and even a lot of so called radfems feel the need to bat their the men in their lives when you say ALL. For the way moids treat women and assign them as role as 2nd class citizen in this world, they deserve nothing short of an eternity of pain and suffering. I used to not really be into seperationalism because i thought it was unviable but at this point i feel like the only solution is to push for separation between men and women by any means possible. Women cannot hope to live freely and safely if they have to share a world with their biggest oppressor and defilers.
>>1474230I agree. It doesn't matter what they do, they contribute to the desecration of the female image and they deserve to be shamed for it. I don't get why they desperately want to join the cool girl feminism club so much, their treachery to women surpasses any trad thot or any slut shaming conservative woman.
>>1474255Males with
victim complexes are the most purest forms of evil sharing the earth.
No. 1474922
File: 1674061133393.png (829.8 KB, 645x783, baptism.png)
You to have be baptized in a river for it to be baptism. You and your shitty little indoor inground pools aren't cutting it.
No. 1474951
File: 1674064421824.jpeg (44.68 KB, 500x368, FFA91ACC-2DDC-4A4B-8E61-DF9886…)
I wish hair styles like the left would make a come back
No. 1475036
File: 1674071130641.jpg (115.24 KB, 1080x974, this shit is annoying.jpg)
glad that the internet has moved on from the introvert vs extrovert dichotomy. Especially since people would completely mischaracterise and misunderstand extroverts/extroversion as only comprising of people who love extremely large social gatherings with complete strangers where topics of discussion remain solely on small talk. Most people just called themselves introverts because they heard introverts were smarter somewhere or they struggled to make friends and convinced themselves it was by choice
No. 1476706
File: 1674134131598.jpg (69.12 KB, 1284x1271, 326312469_917714729397074_8392…)
i hate introverts.
do you have fewer friends because youre more picky or is it more likely because those few people are your only option because youre insufferable
No. 1476733
>>1476706I’m sorry you need to interact with a room full of people to feel like you exist.
>>1476710The closer you are to someone the closer your values have to align.
No. 1476793
>>1476789My apparently unpop opinion is that Introvert/extroverts aren't a thing and lockdown has proved that
>Most people like human interaction in some form. >Most people become exhausted by social pressure and need time to unwind.Therefore no one is strictly introverted or extroverted but a mix of both people are playing side picking retardism when they call themselves extroverts/introverts solely.
A extrovert can have social anxiety and become nervous around others and an introvert can have an insatiable need for attention and validation from others.
No. 1476893
>>1476793I don't know where you got that impression of lockdown, all I saw were introverts talking about how their lives didn't change much or that they were loving WFH so they don't have to see people in the office, and they were confused about why there was so much fuss about being isolated from extroverts. It almost got to the point of gloating, saying that as an introvert myself.
But yeah like
>>1476800 said, it's a descriptor and a reasonably useful one. I call myself an introvert so people understand that I don't actually hate their guts if I don't want to hang out or chat all the time.
No. 1476980
File: 1674159775693.jpg (334.24 KB, 1200x1800, Alexa_Demie.jpg)
this bitch ugly. i never watched euphoria and heard about there being a ~twans~ character and legit thought this was who they were talking about
No. 1477048
>>1477040there's a difference between people who smoke weed and stoners, even people who smoke habitually every day. clearly the people who you're talking about aren't stoners. i had a stoner friend before.
>smoked morning to night>always offered weed and would act weird when you rejected it >would vehemently claim any and all criticism of weed was propaganda including valid criticisms of needing more studies for vapes and high concentrations>drove high and claimed he had more awareness high>denied the existence of psychological addiction to weed>denied that weed could cause bad trips>brought up weed when no one was mentioning it>talked constantly about how much happier he was highthere's more but i can't think of it.
No. 1477229
File: 1674184885628.jpg (Spoiler Image,317.19 KB, 1332x2000, ooooo.jpg)
Crushing on fictional men > real men.
You basically have to get very lucky to get into a long relationship that enriches your life and doesn't end poorly without having to self-deceive somehow, most dating women really just chase after the exception and end up with questionable men.
Most risk-benefit analysis favors husbandofagging. The #1 potential issue is being socially out of touch with people which is often a natural consequence of having neet-type hobbies and priorities, but grow beyond that and you'll be powerful. disclaimer: no I don't have a husbando and I wish I did kek.
No. 1477471
File: 1674229620209.jpg (266.43 KB, 1080x1080, ad72dd44249e80a1a39a105f5fe6a8…)
weed is very addictive i say this as a stoner lol. I have tried to quit many times but one bad day will have me going back. I honestly wish weed was still illegal (well maybe not illegal i dont think people should go to jail for using it) but i just miss when it was harder to get. Now with dispensaries you can literally order weed online and have it delivered to your door. INsted of having to network in order to find a guy who knows a guy who deals weed, going to the sketchy side of town to get your goods. It made it so much easier for me to take breaks when it was impacting my life. But now that it is so easily accessible its so much harder. It sucks knowing your addicted to something but not being able to stop it. Im just glad its weed and not alcohol though. But both are terrible in their own ways for long term use. My brothers are stoners and have told me that they want to stop smoking because it really does make you lazy and unproductive. And you start to get addicted to that feeling. I get why stoners are so defensive though because you dont want to believe you are addicted to something its terrifying.
No. 1477530
>>1477154Purely my limited experience but every stoner I've known has had this faux 'I'm so laid back' facade when in reality they're the first one to lose their shit with you over the smallest thing or to freak out over any lil bump in their life that requires them to sit up and function for a bit. I think alot of highly strung people use it as a cope and then conveniently forget that they still have their same old uptight or stressed out personality going on underneath it all.
> I'm the most laid back person that I know!No you're not. You're just drunk or high right now and you're forgetting how you act as soon as you're not drunk or high
No. 1477639
File: 1674242696080.jpg (54.54 KB, 714x732, 3929838393.jpg)
Hamnonnie was funny only when the post were sporadic and not too often, don't know why everyone was so mad at her kek
No. 1478415
File: 1674319885368.jpeg (732.41 KB, 1284x1522, 0BFEAA33-A9E6-41FF-9907-50C205…)
I can’t help but laugh at women who complain about the issues they get being pretty but at the same time they put 3lbs of makeup on, wear tight clothes etc. if being pretty is so bad for you then why don’t you just stop? It’s not hard to be average or ugly
No. 1478455
>>1478415I can feel for women who are born naturally very striking and who get a sea of shitty men who pretend their interest in them is any deeper than that. A combo of natural beauty and a shletered/naive upbringing can lead to those downsides.
This woman just looks like someone who grew up ugly and has gone out of her way to invest in beauty though.
No. 1478560
>>1478512It's me
>>1478548Yea like if we are spooning and he's falling asleep it'll grow a little bit and twitch suddenly, then chill out a little while later, just doing its own thing
No. 1478564
File: 1674332400903.jpg (36.04 KB, 513x499, dog.jpg)
>>1478473I like lightly punching my boyfriends dick and then make fun of him for getting hard
>>1478512>cockcoreKEK
No. 1479275
>>1479264The troon always hated josh and was always in the kiwifarms thread, Josh's fat ass being talked about him
postitively didn't start the fire, the fire was burning already. Plus Josh has so many enemies, no one NEEDS to inspire some retarded troon/person with a thread to call him a pedophile and spam everywhere they can, to ruin a female site they hate PLUS speard hate about a fat man they also hate.
No. 1479469
File: 1674417166184.jpeg (46.19 KB, 668x374, A49F22E0-0891-4C90-8C2C-A2ADA8…)
Harry Potter is a pathetic badly written excuse of a book and it polluted kids literature with its mediocre plotline and stupid rip off from folklore. Fans are brainlets even more so those who praise Rowling for being an open TERF. She’s a rich asshole doesn’t care about you all she cares about is getting her name circulating, she doesn’t even care about her fans or about her works yet you all suck on her because she’s a ~ free speech woman ~. If it was a moid you’d be saying how much you hate him.
And no, I don’t hate her because of her TERF views or what not, I hate how much Harry Potter is shilled everywhere and how much of blind imbeciles the fans are.
No. 1479595
File: 1674432985020.jpg (23.3 KB, 345x496, gungadinlaugh.jpg)
>>1479324
Ayrt KEK awww I love you too. You should be happy there's another damn Beach Boys fan on this whole accursed site
No. 1480252
File: 1674526410168.gif (794.44 KB, 220x124, 1665437134818.gif)
we don't owe it to anyone to be nice to them, including children. people expect everyone to be kind to children and spout the idea they are individuals and people, but for some reason they also must be shielded from anything negative. people will literally hate you for no reason, and the idea of forcing everyone who are also individuals and people to follow the same mindset seems kinda weird. you're allowed to have personal opinions except when it comes to kids. this is silly and makes no sense if we're seeing everyone as individuals. some people just genuinely hate things including kids, thats reality and trying to browbeat people into another opinion because "think of the children!" doesn't help in the long run. humans are complex creatures with their own motivations, but for some reason if you dont like kids you must put aside your own feelings and comfort for them even though they aren't your own. it just makes no sense to me when the idea of "we are individuals who don't owe the world a goddamn thing!" is conditional.
No. 1480269
>>1480252You can just choose not to interact with kids
nonnie, you're an adult and no one's stopping you
No. 1480273
>>1480269I do, I'm not openly nasty to them or anything and they should be free to live their lives but the idea that everyone else should be accomodating seems odd.
>>1480265I'm not saying people should be shitty to children, just that the idea that children are the exception seems weird when people also spew the idea of "you dont owe anyone anything!"
No. 1480294
>>1480283I get your point, I think, like if I'm at my family's home and there's a bunch of kids/babies, I shouldn't be a substitute nanny just because I'm a woman, or just because I'm a family member, sure, if one of the children get hurt or sick I can just report it to the mom/dad/aunt/uncle, but I shouldn't be the one who takes the responsibility of taking care of the kid because it's literally not mine and not my responsibility, since I don't really know that kid/baby that deeply as the mom or dad, I could actually be fucking up something instead of helping.
But there's also the thing that if you were to see a lost kid, for example, it's better to help the kid because they can't protect themselves, and yeah, that means being as neutral or kind as possible because it's probably a new experience, it's scary, and overall very shitty for the kid.
And even then I just avoid them most of the times so I can make sure I can find an authority before dealing with the kid on my own, because I'm sure I would be defensive and such if I saw anyone approaching my hypothetical child.
No. 1480295
>>1480288i dont feel like you've gone outside enough, because my experiences have been the opposite as well as a lot of people i know, but maybe the kids in my area are more badly behaved. i dont use reddit kek, and there are people who will literally be at a doctors office and ask you to share your phone with their kid because they're throwing a tantrum that they dont have one (yes a personal anecdote).
>Can you give an example of what you mean by selfish because I can't think of anything I can refuse to an adult that I can't also refuse to a child.the idea of not owing anyone anything which is a big thing being pushed right now (see the "villain era" trend) is inherently seen as selfish because you're only focusing on yourself. this is seen as good and a step forward in society, but it all stops when children come into the picture. refusing a child that isnt your own something makes every adult in the vicinity immediately get in their feelings. im mostly talking in circles though, i do appreciate others opinions and thoughts on the matter because it shows the nuances of topics like these
No. 1481614
>>1481572Nta, I remember seeing a video of a black gnc woman being sir'ed by a cashier, even though she has a pretty obvious chest. People don't actually analyze or look that hard, they just see the "male uniform" and go "oh that's a man". If people aren't aware of butch lesbians really being a thing or don't expect coming across them, they're not going to jump to that conclusion. How else do you think btw that women in the past could live entire lives as men with nobody being the wiser? People don't expect it, so they don't look for it.
So yeah, I don't have much faith that your average hooligan looking up to beat a black boy, is going to be more discerning than a random cashier.
No. 1481636
>>1481630Anon I'm with you, I'm replying to this
>>1481510 anon
No. 1481639
>>1481510>are you insane Nope when I was a thinner woman with no hair and didn’t give a shit about fashion there were men who definitely thought I was a black guy and definitely tried to fuck with me lol now I make it super obvious I’m a woman because men act like they can’t tell the difference between a Tom boy and a man if it’s a
poc woman.
No. 1481647
File: 1674679214976.jpeg (360.98 KB, 1639x2048, 4B8898EF-8C10-4D06-8A8D-C5E337…)
>>1481644Just basic bitch clothes nothing extreme. I definitely used to just put on whatever and on top of that I didn’t have hair so I’d get clocked as a man all the time. Even though I didn’t look like a man at all imo I was a 5’5 95lbs girls so I’m assuming people are just slow.
No. 1481984
>>1481973I think they all had distinct personalities, maybe except velma of all characters lmao. I do think their personalities are pretty basic though so i kind of agree. I think it's awful regardless of the scooby doo branding, watching the show nothing about it registers as scooby doo anyways, but this is an unpopular opinions thread anyways so you are
valid <3
No. 1482553
File: 1674752767567.jpg (658.27 KB, 2045x2045, 1661371322676.jpg)
honestly I hope transracialism becomes a thing, not cause I believe in it but cause it genuinely has more ground to stand on then transgenderism and even enby shit
No. 1483541
>>1483465And the source was your own delusions.
Next you’ll tell us equal pay was a white women pysop movement for the same reason.
No. 1483600
File: 1674847336345.jpeg (151.22 KB, 1280x720, B629AEC1-0362-49F2-B006-43B911…)
This show still sucks but the extreme hate for it is retarted and specifically because they race bended the main characters. Reminds me of Ghostbusters 2016.
No. 1483640
>>1483454You're right. A lot of libfems took up for trannies from a compassionate angle (and because at the end of the day, they'll do what men say). A lot of women also love gay male validation/friendship, so they assumed that all trannies are just an extension of their "fun sassy" gay male friend. After trannies successfully glommed onto feminism, men got the memo that they could get one over on women by uplifting their bros in skirts (or by trooning out themselves to live out porn fantasies).
The transgender stuff wouldn't have made it in the way we're currently seeing if it wasn't for liberal feminists falling for the bullshit again and again, misusing that one Simone De Beauvoir quote lol. If it was just men, we'd probably only see the medical industry pushing it, and the social progression would've been much slower. Men, on their own, are too homophobic and obsessed with hierarchy and beating the shit out of eachother to publicly tolerate anything that could be perceived as "faggotry" en masse. They'd rather keep their shit a secret while taking the opportunity to persecute men who don't hide it as well (or at all).
All the autistic flag shit, the "just be kind" angle, imaginary gender fixation ("I'm feeling so
gender today"), degeneration of mass media and common language ("people with uteruses") and social justice angles are due to upper class or upper middle class women who view themselves as feminists thinking they were just helping their gay friends. There's no way most of them could have ever known about AGP rapists and all the other shit we're seeing now, so I don't really blame them, but it is what it is.
No. 1483658
>>1483541ntayrt
https://www.npr.org/2020/08/26/904730251/yes-women-could-vote-after-the-19th-amendment-but-not-all-women-or-men>While the women's suffrage movement had its roots in the anti-slavery movement, early suffragist leaders including Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony would later split off from their alliance with abolitionists. They were outraged that, under the 15th amendment, Black men would get the vote while white women were still denied.
>Decades later, when the 19th amendment was up for debate, Southern politicians especially seethed over the prospect of enfranchising millions of African American women, just as the 15th amendment had enfranchised Black men — by law if not by practice.
>In the face of racist opposition, white suffragists betrayed the Black women who had also long fought for the right to vote, says Elaine Weiss, author of The Woman's Hour: The Great Fight to Win the Vote.
>"We have to acknowledge," Weiss says, "that [white suffragists] used as one of their politically expedient arguments, 'You know, there are more white women who will be voting than Black women. So don't worry. White supremacy is not going to be endangered.'"
>Along with African Americans, other groups who continued to be excluded from the vote included Asian American immigrants, who were long ineligible for naturalized citizenship on account of race, and only won the vote starting in 1943. No. 1483666
>>1483660Samefag but black women were at the voting conferences in 1850.
Sojourner Truth gave her speech in 1851 at the women’s voting convention and npr is a shitty right leaning source.
No. 1483670
>>1483660You're kind of glossing over the part where you tried to appeal to racist white scrotes and trod all over non-white women though.
>In 1918, leading suffragist Carrie Chapman Catt framed the argument this way in a letter to North Carolina Congressman Edwin Webb, trying to persuade him to vote yes on the 19th amendment:
>[The] present condition in the South makes sovereigns of some negro men, while all white women are their subjects. These are sad but solemn truths. If you want white supremacy, why not have it constitutionally, honorably? The Federal Amendment offers the way.Imagine having black (and Asian, and Latina) women fight with you for the right to vote, just to fuck them over and ignore them to appeal to misogynistic men.
>>1483666Okay, then here's history.com saying it
https://www.history.com/news/suffragists-vote-black-women
>During the AERA’s founding convention, Black suffragist Frances Ellen Watkins Harper addressed how this framing was unhelpful for her and other Black women. “[Harriet Tubman], whose courage and bravery won a recognition from our army and from every Black man in the land, is excluded from every thoroughfare of travel,” Harper said. “Talk of giving women the ballot-box? Go on.”
>After only three years, the AERA dissolved over heated fights about whether to support the 15th Amendment, with which Black men won the right to vote. (In the South, this victory would be short-lived.) At a pivotal convention in May 1869, Douglass argued that the AERA should support the amendment while continuing to fight for women’s suffrage. Stanton not only disagreed, she gave an address filed with racist stereotypes about the male immigrants and formerly enslaved men whom the amendment would enfranchise.
>“Think of Patrick and Sambo and Hans and Yung Tung, who do not know the difference between a monarchy and a republic, who cannot read the Declaration of Independence or Webster’s spelling book, making laws for…Susan B. Anthony,” she said at the convention. “[The amendment] creates an antagonism everywhere between educated, refined women and the lower orders of men, especially in the South.”
>Both Anthony and Stanton died more than a decade before the 19th Amendment passed. And although their work was instrumental in making that passage possible, they did not work to prioritize making voting rights accessible to all women. In 1920, Black women in the south and many Latinas in the southwest were still barred from voting because of racist voting restrictions. And when they tried to reach out to the main suffrage organizations at the time, they were ignored.
>“They say basically, ‘Help us, we still can’t vote,’” Tetrault explains. “And those organizations basically say, ‘That’s a race question, it doesn’t concern us.’” No. 1483677
>>1483672Sure, but why is it okay to throw women who aren't white under the bus?
>I don’t think that being mad that black people could vote but no women is necessarily racistBy "no women", you mean "white women", anon. They deliberately blocked non-white women. They also used racist language and stereotypes in their language to further push themselves and lock out women who weren't white, in spite of starting the whole movement in tandem with all women. That is fucked.
No. 1483683
File: 1674850898590.png (250.65 KB, 294x474, 11.png)
>>1483666>>1483672>>1483670I don't get this logic, the suffragists were a vast active umbrella movement in the Anglosphere, they didn't have united policy on other issues
some were Christian republicans, some were socialists and some were racist rightwingers and ended up joining the fascist or right parties of their own nations
an example would be Mary Sophia Allen, who was a lesbian suffragette who also joined the British Fascist party, she personally met Francisco Franco, Mussolini and Hitler(whom she admired greatly) also had a pathological hatred against Jews
No. 1483704
File: 1674851678583.png (340.34 KB, 610x562, 249e80a1a39a105.png)
okay I swear this isn't racebait but anyone else agree this is really weird ? Note I don't think this is part of some grand anti-white conspiracy rather its a national level of virtue signaling that should frankly be acknowledged, like the non-white populations of those countries are very tiny, having a black woman to represent the UK or the Netherlands is not representative of those nations. Also it's funny that only western countries are doing this. You don't see Nigeria or Cameroon having a white woman as the one representing them
No. 1483712
File: 1674851914088.png (1.3 MB, 1024x683, 16546102428872.png)
>>1483704>Also it's funny that only western countries are doing this. You don't see Nigeria or Cameroon having a white woman as the one representing themI'd like to show you Miss Haiti 2022 lmao
No. 1483720
File: 1674852500303.jpg (66.32 KB, 456x640, Angélique François.jpg)
>>1483712nta but this is Miss Haiti 2022 though and all previous Miss Haiti's have also been black
No. 1483721
>>1483704>okay I swear this isn't racebaitBut it is. Don't lie, you want to sperg about non-white women getting attention.
>Note I don't think this is part of some grand anti-white conspiracy Well thats a relief that you're not a complete drooling, knuckle dragging /pol/ moid of a retard, just a normie insecure retard.
>rather its a national level of virtue signaling that should frankly be acknowledgedNah, it's stupid and clearly virtue signalling but who cares, you're giving this more power than it deserves.
Also this isn't an unpopular opinion the entire internet thinks this is stupid and most are vehemently racist moids who sperg about this dumb shit. The other anon is right, you bizarrely sperging about the race of less represented women instead of how fucked up beauty pageants are in general is the real problem that 'should frankly be acknowledged'.
Regardless, I do hope that you are aware that you must be at least 18 to post on this website, it's the only excuse I can think of for such a dumbshit post.
No. 1483724
>>1483704Not on topic I just want to say Misses Great Britain looks so amazing (I find the brows very british though kek).
On topic in the non white countries i've seen a lot of the lightest skinned women with the most eurocentric features winning these contests. But then I don't keep track of all the competitions so what do I know.
No. 1483725
File: 1674852817342.png (854.66 KB, 730x450, Screen-Shot-2022-06-08-at-10.p…)
>>1483720https://theblockcharlotte.com/847643/miss-global-haiti-2022-is-an-accomplished-neurosurgeon-leading-the-fight-against-covid-19/Seems like she was the delegate for another large international beauty pageant (Miss Global). Doesn't negate the point being made either way though.
No. 1483731
File: 1674853125872.png (664.05 KB, 577x751, vs2.png)
>>1483726She's white, this is her without the heavy makeup and indoors.
No. 1483737
File: 1674853563627.png (563.77 KB, 997x716, 52x.png)
>>1483724>On topic in the non white countries i've seen a lot of the lightest skinned women with the most eurocentric features winning these contests.This kek. It's a common thing.
No. 1483748
File: 1674854054239.png (485.95 KB, 995x907, missj.png)
>>1483704Samefag, but here's another example for you if you really think it's just western countries.
No. 1483799
>>1483788And at least 2 out of the 4 women in this post
>>1483704 being complained about are half white, of the nationality of their country. No switching up now, kek.
No. 1484068
File: 1674884161148.jpg (26.94 KB, 336x336, FOEtIrPWUAQ0Ehw.jpg)
I'm against arbitrary beauty standards but I think both men and women should shave their armpits(armpit hair will always be disgusting) and be allowed to wear concealer and foundation at most
No. 1484074
>>1484068Armpits stink if you don't shave them and I'd prefer not to use underarm religiously as it's full of alcohol and the idea behind magnesium based ones are absurd.
Obviously there's no avoiding deodorant when exercising but imo shaving the armpit is one of the best preventions for accumulated stank that both men and women should undertake for this reason. Of course moids won't though. Armpit hair is gross because it accumulates stink, not the hair by itself.
No. 1484168
>>1484074If you wash yourself everyday you won’t smell.
>Without hair sweat can be washed off with just waterNice try, you still need soap.
No. 1484247
File: 1674913860155.png (46.37 KB, 580x770, square-enix-tones-down-its-too…)
All male video game characters should look this way or similar.
No. 1484260
>>1484254Now you get a taste of what it’s like to have people who look nothing like you represent you and take spots from you in the media. Boo hoo. You get a tiny taste of what
poc women deal with on a larger scale and it doesn’t feel good. Get over it.
No. 1484265
>>1484263>wahhhh it’s virtues signaling Why should anyone care though? For decades white women have been put in roles intended for
poc women,
poc women have had to deal with mixed women and racially ambiguous women representing them and it didn’t matter then why should I care now. I should care because it’s white women being replaced?
No. 1484277
>>1484274Again why should we care though? No one was complaining when white women got chosen to represent countries where they aren’t the majority or when they take roles from
poc women in the media. Should we care now because it happening to white people?
No. 1484283
>>1484281For example look at how many movie roles where the characters are supposed to be
poc women but they hire white women but now that white characters are being race bent now everyone has a problem with it. Also, no one has a problem when white people are picked for things because they are white, why is it a problem if a black women is picked because she’s black? Sure, she might have been picked because she’s black and they want to seem more woke, so what? It’s not different from white women being picked for shit only because they are white.
No. 1484299
>>1484074I've noticed that no armpit hair sweat and armpit hair sweat smell different, armpit hair sweat is way worse than hairless. If any anons want to do a little field project I would recommend trying this out kek.
I do have a vivid memory of playing hide and seek at my friends' house as a kid and her aunt visited while we were playing. The whole house smelt of armpit hair sweat, and really strongly. I don't know how in the fuck that was possible, the house was like 300m^2. Every time someone on the internet says they don't wear deodorant, I just assume they smell like her.
No. 1484310
File: 1674919244183.jpg (88.25 KB, 1080x501, Screenshot_2023-01-28-16-18-15…)
women who fuck men and live with them generally look older and more tired and I believe it's because scrotes literally suck the life energy out of them. meanwhile I'm a virgo with literally zero interaction with males, not even in my family, and people still assume I'm in high school because of my virgin retard socially and sexually stunted vibe, I have a young face but I believe it's much more than that, it's about your energy and how you carry yourself. I don't know a lot of people who are like me, but the women I know of who also never engaged with men in any way also look extremely young for their age and give this certain vibe.
No. 1484357
File: 1674923462402.jpeg (173.37 KB, 1500x1125, 94E45067-B8BC-4CF5-BB75-0E0554…)
Ice spice is a great example of light skin privilege in the black community
>can’t rap
>mediocre songs
>not extremely pretty but she’s just very light with pink undertones and black scrotes are going wild for it
I mean she’s cute and all but I’m tired of a new light skin rapper that pops up every few months and everyone has to eat their ass
No. 1484370
File: 1674924415810.jpg (164.74 KB, 1080x1168, Ice-Spice-mobile.jpg)
>>1484368Nta but she's not white kek she's a lightskinned biracial woman.
No. 1484373
>>1484357She's like Saweetie nonnies gonna come in like
>male rappers can be wack blah blahBut the state of the female rap community is basically based on looks/being relatable when you are biracial, you can not really be a good rapper. However MTS and other monoracial black women have to deal with all these standards and have to not only look good, but sound good, can't have a style have to constantly change etc.
Ice spice is taking Saweetie's spot except she's slightly better then saweetie
No. 1484414
File: 1674928338904.jpg (40.05 KB, 540x540, gOrqTVCterIFDynvFFL5s_k9WBo8ON…)
The first season of The Walking Dead game had a better story than The Last of Us. Also, Joel seems kinda generic and I'm not sure why people like him so much.
No. 1484439
>>1484424Her father is a black man. In america people do not give a shit if you are not a first generation african, if you're mixed race you will be categorized as "
POC" or black if one parent is african american. Anyway she lives in america and so the retarded american race logic applies to her.
No. 1484655
>>1484466The entire baby plot
pissed me off so much. Like I literally didn't care about half the characters in Season 2. Season 1 was amazing and I have replayed it three times and still cry when I have to make the decision to kill or not kill Lee at the end. It's actually heart breaking Clem is such a good character in season 1 of the game. It was a surprise masterpiece imo of a game.
No. 1484765
File: 1674963586419.jpg (22.73 KB, 660x433, Genomic_Imprinting.jpg)
The bone marrow to make sperm thing that some radfems sperg about is as unscientific womb transplants
first off those cells in that rat experiment weren't fully sperm cells, they lacked fertilization function (was not performed in this paper), and the Stra8+ BMCs into germ cells with retinoic acid treatment (the method used for rats) besides not, unless they make massive advances in the field. the sperm cells created aren't new telomeres which means that they will be the age of the person they took them from genetically, so the children will have a drastically shorter lifespan(if it was possible in the first place)
No. 1484792
>>1483661>>1483664Is this a joke? Not only racism is also a thing among women of color, but the countries where minorities (racial, religious, etc.) are treated best (I'm not saying it's perfect at all) are Western countries. And these countries reek of white guilt. People in other countries wouldn't put up with this shit even if they are "
POC" (e.g. in Asian or African countries - I wish people would go there sometimes and see how it's done). Now of course if you look at Western women in the 1800s/1900s with today's American standards, they are racists. But the same can be said of any country at that time. It's almost amusing to me how even after putting themselves down all the freaking time, white women are still accused of "betraying their own sex" or whatever more than any other demographic. Hope they learn their lesson one day.
No. 1484854
File: 1674975761098.jpg (70.89 KB, 680x940, 2d21aa1b3ce748a024788ab169d259…)
>>1484792I'm south asian and what your saying isn't untrue, an actress who likes Simone Ashley would never have a role in any major or minor bollywood or tollywood film or tv series
No. 1484983
File: 1674996890041.jpg (72.13 KB, 1280x720, jjjjjjj.jpg)
Clone High was never a funny show. The idea is funny but they wanted to make a teendrama parody so the history stuff and jokes takes the backseat. The teendrama jokes aren't even that funny. I kinda suspect that the writers weren't that into history because I have seen hardcore history nerds make historical figures from different periods and locations interact with each other and it has been genuinely fun but in Clone High you kinda forget that they are historical figures
>inb4 they are not the historical figures only clones of them
then why even have the history angle might as well just have been ocs
No. 1485121
File: 1675012119941.jpg (107.19 KB, 981x1172, FnoMSWeWAAAU40X.jpg)
>>1468532I'm so sick of thots. It's not misogyny to tell women to wear normal clothes and stop sexualizing themselves if they don't want to be sexualized. There's another viral video of a woman at gym wearing minimum clothes while complaining about males "creeping" on her just because some random guy took a quick look at her. These women are so narcissistic and I'm sick of modern feminism being nothing more than some thot defense club. They already live on the ultimate easy mode with scrotes giving them money for breathing, they don't need any sympathy, tell them to fuck off and grow the fuck up.
No. 1485138
>>1485126If you expose a bodypart in public you are saying it's okay for others to look at it. Women shouldn't be treated like stupid children who can never take responsibility for anything. Men are capable of working out in t-shirts and boxy shorts, why do women NEED to wear as close to nothing as possible? If gyms allowed it, these thots would be turning up in thongs and you know it. The men in those videos aren't even doing anything weird, literally just happen to look at the woman for few seconds while walking by.
>>1485134Being able to make any money by just looking pretty is easy mode by definition.
No. 1485187
File: 1675015228165.jpg (234.23 KB, 736x1015, 1980s-Workout-Gear.jpg)
>>1485138>Exposing a body partIf you truly think wearing picrel outfit is on the same page as public indecency idk what to tell you. The issue is that 1; workout clothes made for women are generally more exposing in general, it's hard as fuck to find tops that aren't cropped anymore either, of course women are going to think it's normal to wear since it's what's pandered to them. 2; women do exercises that require very little clothes such as pilates or yoga, sure you can do workouts in baggy shirts or something but there's often way too much movement and the extra fabric gets in the way and messes you up.
Either way you sound like a moid who simply just hates women and digs for shit to hate us over or some skinnyfat seething because other women look good in workout clothes and you don't which would explain why your main problem is "they ummm get creeped on so I hate them"
No. 1485195
>>1485150My company VP
>frat bro who happened to enter the company as a director right out of college because the CEO is a evangelical Christian and he played up his "god-fearing" talking points. Slacks off and bought a Nintendo switch for his office. Spends days in useless meetings, usually over expensive food. Comes to me when it's time to do an actual cost analysis or it's time to sort out taxes. Defers any hard decision to outside consultants that he pays and primarily chooses based on if they pass a vibe check and are bros.Women in my company including myself
>can work for the company for 5 years and not get recognized for anything meanwhile new dork/stooge #3 gets congratulated publicly for impregnating his wife or for selling a mediocre amount that you're supposed to do anyway in sales. >have actually evidence of saving the company over 700k, took over leadership in projects when random guys jump ship to another company (even after management gives them crazy bonuses to retain them), have saved the company from certain embarrassment from both governments officials visiting and from spotting blank pages in multi million dollar contract proposals where someone typed "pls copy paste your part here Jared" and was one minute away from sending it to the client like that.>have organized every single new connection with clients via tradeshows and good networking, yet the company doesn't reward them to go out there; the company sends bros to go out to the nice cities to mingle with them and stay in nice hotels and barely hide the fact that they're partying (and they come back with no leads anyway and blame the economy).Inb4 leave. This is corporate America, it's the same shit all over. I do have my department in a chokehold rn since I'm the only one who can and wants to keep my department running so I'm going to demand 150k salary soon (which will probably get me a reputation as a bitch by Mr VP).
No. 1485215
>>1485121Nice bait. I do wonder why a site with an userbase as LC's would love to defend this type of women to such extents, most would throw every anon under the bus if male approval was on the line they really don't give a
single shit about other women, you guys really need to choose better your fights
No. 1485221
File: 1675017088386.jpg (230.86 KB, 2000x2541, 1641421466573.jpg)
>>1485138kys damaged xy chromosomoid, if I ever see you expose your arms I will do the same like you abominations, stalk after you, call you a slut, kill you and then say you deserve it for flaunting yourself like that
No. 1485227
File: 1675017427408.png (Spoiler Image,196.02 KB, 1134x224, thotsandthoths.PNG)
>>1485127>thothsI don't know anon. if sex with moids could turn me into a bird-headed scribe god, I might consider it
No. 1485258
>>1485247There was this autistic man we were forced to interact with at work, everyone looked at me like i had 3 eyes every time i tried to stop him from interrupting our work process, i wasn't even being mean
>>1485252This, imagine calling out a moid for being misogynistic while shitting on other group of women unprovoked
at the same time, fucking kek. Its always about those "ugly bitches" being totally jealous of the 10/10 attractive "thots" or whatever, high school shit
No. 1485261
File: 1675019748470.jpg (12.35 KB, 250x216, b78277473bdb1adb1a08e630fbbd93…)
>>1485121Rope yourself. Kek i'm literally a femcel myself but it's literally always a (((moids))) faults no matter what, assuming you aren't a LARPing scrote to begin with anyway.
No. 1485268
>>1485256Don't care about the moid crying about women he's retarded but
>Just because you only defend the women who share your exact same views and lifestyle doesn't mean that other women are like thatGood luck with that kek, you guys never learn. At least stick to women who will have your back, i would feel like shit if i had to defend pickmes working actively against what i defend over and over, they
will embarrass you at some point and you know it
No. 1485274
>>1485261Go back to twitter.
inb4 ((())), femcel, rope
No. 1485339
File: 1675025542662.png (117.36 KB, 1588x223, jism.png)
>>1485247>>1485290autistic men > normal men. I have one of my own, and he's devoted to me like a dog to its owner.
No. 1485343
File: 1675025861241.jpg (239.2 KB, 1440x810, Gwen.jpg)
Gwen's design is good. She is a doll that became human and her design shows that. Unless you're stupid and don't know that lolita fashion and hair drills are associated with dolls.
No. 1485351
>>1485339Autistic men are so hot when they have no ego, they know that you're the best thing to ever happen to them and act like it every waking second. Normie men can't compare to such a perfect specimen.
They're even worse than normie moids when they have even a shard of hubris though. Anything beyond earned confidence in their special skill (and sometimes even that) turns them into vile failed humans for which there is no hope of escape.
No. 1485364
>>1485340He's obsessive about hygiene and exercise. He just couldn't find anyone else willing to deal with his tism. Like once we went to a concert, I suddenly couldn't find him, he was overwhelmed and had left without me out of panic. Also, he's rich but women never found out about that because they weren't willing to get to know him better after they found out about his autistic behavior.
>>1485351Exactly this, if you get a good one they have self awareness and know just about no one's willing to deal with their sensory shit and suddenly needing to be completely alone for a week straight. Mine will sometimes say "please don't look at me today okay?" because he needs a break from being looked at kek. He knows its retarded and thinks I'm a literal angel for even bothering with him.
No. 1485374
File: 1675027211851.jpeg (16.25 KB, 275x183, 3A3BB6FE-0854-46D8-9066-E76485…)
>>1485121I know a zoomer girl who literally go out in white crop top, like sports bra, and spandex shorts and be like “oh the pigs”
I mean… either don’t make their lives easier by doing what they like or just own it and be chill about unnecessary males gazing, who the fuck cares
No. 1485378
>>1485364>Mine will sometimes say "please don't look at me today okay?"i don't care how unpopular of an opinion this is that is cute asf
nonnie. i hope you and your bf have many happy years together
No. 1485385
File: 1675027619734.jpeg (599.64 KB, 1920x2560, Image-3-scaled.jpeg)
>>1485374Somewhat agree. Like there's no need to wear pic rel to the gym. Shorts that have scrunch pattern so it goes literally between your asscheeks, and those shapes under the butt that makes it look lifted and even more emphasized. It's like wearing a padded push up bra and complaining that people look at your cleavage.
No. 1485394
>>1485359We can create it, anon. If I was slightly more deranged and had any particular scrotes I wanted to interact with negatively, I'd pretend to be a man and relentlessly send
abusive messages.
No. 1485501
File: 1675035868759.jpeg (298.7 KB, 1117x1191, R (4).jpeg)
The prequels were better than the original trilogy, even if the dialogue is cringe.
No. 1485504
>>1485501Only reason I stayed as long as I did on reddit was because of this.
Prequels>Originals>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sequals
No. 1485505
>>1485504You have good taste
nonnie.
No. 1485510
File: 1675036837866.jpeg (3.55 MB, 2700x1840, 1653079197065.jpeg)
>>1485508Yes, I will defend any woman over mra scrotes. Problem?
No. 1485519
File: 1675037822688.jpeg (72.33 KB, 602x752, main-qimg-932f237ab47bd7e60d2d…)
>>1485517Yeah, the privilege of being terrifying.
No. 1485521
>>1485511That was my favourite part as well. Instead of the whole genetic turning evil for no reason, Anakin struggled with temptation and acted out of desperation to save Pademe. It gave more depth to Darth Vadar.
Also lets not forget the "I hate sand," line.
No. 1485529
>>1485522I wonder if it is a regional thing. In my country green eyes are seen as gorgeous, especially on women
>>1485519Agree, my nigel eyes are blue and look soulless
No. 1485923
I don’t think saying “if he really loved you, he wouldn’t have done x” helps anyone. I’m already thinking that aren’t I? There’s already a disconnect, and that’s why it hurts so much, I don’t understand and I don’t think he loved me. I start feeling dumb, crazy, and question my perception of reality.
Reframing it as “he did love me, he was just selfish” helped me move on. The former is a lose-lose explanation, I’m hurt and he’s not because he never cared. How does that help anyone? That’s not what I wanted, anyway. The latter is a win-win explanation, I get the peace of mind that he did love me, and am reassured I’m not the one who’s hurt the most out of the two because if he loved me then that means he’s the one that has to live with the knowledge that he messed up and the reason we had a fallout. He got in a relationship with me despite knowing he would not make me happy because he loved me too much to not be selfish. And it makes sense because men are notorious for only thinking about what benefits them. They don’t care if they’re harming someone because love to them is what makes them feel good. They love instant gratification, they don’t think about long-term consequences.
No. 1485936
>>1485923i feel you anon and it's definitely possible for people (especially men imho) to love selfishly and do things that will hurt the person they love, especially when they take that person for granted or have their own issues like
>>1485928 perfectly said. just because it ended badly doesn't mean your ex never loved you, otherwise most relationships wouldn't make any sense.
>>1485929this lmao.
No. 1485942
>>1485929seethe more. radical feminism women are going to be married, rich and taken care of by their children.
liberal feminists are going to be 60, in their butt scrunchie leggings, still streaming to slave-helmet-cells so they can eat, pussy literally falling apart from 40+ years of "freedom", all alone and now looking in the mirror, praying to god.
was it worth it, dummy?
No. 1485997
>>1485989So that must mean it never happens! Ever! Good job anon you figured it all out. Anons are just lying.
No but seriously I see the most disgusting fat pigs going topless any time it's slightly warm. Consider yourself lucky.
No. 1486001
File: 1675104145733.jpg (1.35 MB, 3017x2209, men-sports.jpg)
>>1485960uhh many men do wear tight clothes to the gym, for biking and for running though. women's clothing is usually made to show off the butt more (while men usually show their arms/torso), but spandex is definitely used for sportswear for both sexes, it's not "ridiculous" lmao.
No. 1486032
>>1486001Spandex up ass cracks looks ridiculous is what I meant
>>1485997My gym is usually freezing though. Of course I see men topless during the summer outside
No. 1486034
File: 1675107240257.jpg (103.61 KB, 980x552, 131011163253-polyamory-07-hori…)
>>1486028this is 100% correct
No. 1486136
>>1486054I exclusively wear baggy pants and tees to the gym and I found them easily, they're usually cheaper than high quality workout leggings as well.
Honestly I think women dressing in revealing clothing at the gym usually are doing so because they are either very self-conscious about their image and hate the thought of looking "frumpy" in public, or because they just really like their body and want to see themselves in the mirror. Some might do it for comfort but I find that hard to understand if only because I hate wearing tight-fitting clothing when I'm sweating kek but maybe I'm autistic. Either way it's a very small number of women that are actually trying to draw male attention at the gym. That being said I think some people will overreact to male attention at the gym, I've seen plenty of videos where a woman catches a "creep" and he's just looking at her or walking past her. I don't think there's anything wrong with looking at attractive people especially if you can tell they worked hard on their body. It's like if I had a car I worked really hard on, I'm not going to drive it around covered in a tarp, I'm gonna show it off, and if other people admire it that's okay. Any kind of verbal and physical harassment is unacceptable, that goes without saying, but looking is not harassment in my opinion.
No. 1486137
File: 1675116493989.jpg (76.24 KB, 778x902, Profile_-_Jasmine.jpg)
>>1486112Just look at how girl characters dress in children's media.
No. 1486143
>>1486112Feminists understand women get hated for EVERYTHING in America. People get so fucking
triggered just by women existing around them, people even take creepshots of women just for the sake of nitpicking their body. There's so many more issues to focus on than clothes
No. 1486146
>>1486138This. I'm tired of the way some anons essentially equate adult women to literal children. It's like the same libfem nonsense but repackaged, they both almost want women to remain helpless and void of any/all accountability, except libfems think that's empowering, while some anons here think it's wrong to take issue because they think the average woman has terminal baby-brain.
It's not even like this is a feminist hill to die on, we're in the unpopular opinions thread and talk about random, silly things all the time. It's not an attack on women to point out some clothes are heavily sexualized.
No. 1486149
>>1486138>>1486146nta but she's not saying they have no agency, rather normie women are more likely to just stick to the status quo, whether they think critically about it or not. a lot of anons on the site like to pretend that society doesn't effect them, or that it shouldn't effect any woman. and that all women who are contributing to patriarchal aspects of society are doing so knowingly. a lot of women actually
do believe libfem values are taking back womanhood and women's sexuality, and that's not because they secretly believe it's misogynistic or something, but because if you look at it from a more narrow lens it's different enough from misogyny to seem that way. some women will never ever get it, and many are satisfied with how their basic lives are. follow trends, buy what they're sold, be critical of things that are targeted to them. tons of people live their lives like that and will never think about anything more. it doesn't mean they're stupid or have no agency, they just are comfortable following what they're given.
No. 1486157
>>1486149I'm the anon who wrote
>>1486112And you're the only anon that gets it top kek.
No. 1486163
File: 1675118241662.jpg (84.31 KB, 1092x1200, cocksucker.jpg)
I hate every single one of you talking about modesty, because there is no way you are somewhere that is 30°C and more than 60% of humidity.
No. 1486169
>>1486161right, but then you couple it with the fact that we're not supposed to give into men sexualizing us as an excuse to covrr up. anti slut shaming, anti
victim blaming and pro female autonomy would dictate that you as a woman should be able to wear what you want and that men are wrong for viewing it sexually, not that women are contributing to the sexualization of the female form. couple that with the push of sexualized trends, the normie woman feels like she's doing what's right by dressing in a way she wants that also happens to be sexual.
No. 1486182
>>1486165again, you're not listening. they're aren't necessarily not questioning it, they just don't want to rock the boat if you will. think about it. the average day of a normie woman is waking up, going to work, getting food, walking their dog, doing cardio, browsing insta, watching netflix. they're not doing actively assuming they're not thinking critically, it's just not the answer you want. most people do live in a society. that's what's easy, that's why when you're critical of society people say you're "woke" as in woke up, or make matrix references. the norm is going with the flow, whatever that flow is.
No. 1486191
>>1486182>they're not thinking criticallyYes, and it's not wrong for anons to dislike that. It's not wrong for any group of people to dislike the way society encourages people not to think critically. In fact, thinking that sort of thing is dumb just encourages more of us to not fall back into that line of living.
So, what is the problem? Aren't anons allowed to do that?
No. 1486192
>>1486182The anons itt don't get this because they assume every single woman knows exactly how every facet of society is to objectify and subjugate women just automatically. Everyone's like "stop treating women like babies!!!" But they are overestimating the critical thinking skills of people in general if they truly think that it is just the simplest thing in the world for a normie straight american woman, who live
RELATIVELY privileged lives compared to women in other countries, to just give up everything they are being told and sold on their own. It's like they don't actually talk to women irl. The same logic used to "peak" TRAs should be used to introduce normie women to radical feminism.
No. 1486198
>>1486188>>1486187Oh my fucking god, way to miss the point so entirely. You think a normie woman with normie woman friends is going to become a radfem overnight? To give up male validation, something they have been groomed into seeking out, because it's sexist? You truly expect them to come to that conclusion on their own? You do know normie women don't use lolcow, right?
>>1486193I'm saying that it is retarded to say that normie women actually love to be ogled and harrassed and molested and creeped on because they don't? They're sold a bunch of bullshit and they follow that bullshit because it's the norm.
>>1486194And I am allowed to share my opinion and disagree with others. People are not understanding that women aren't actually asking to be raped just because they wear sports bras.
No. 1486202
>>1486198i'm
>>1486188 and didn't mean to respond to you, hit your post accidentally because of the deleting and weird site loading issues. meant to respond to
>>1486185 No. 1486207
>>1486198Knowing thinks they’re asking to be raped, I do think they’re asking to be ogled though.
>>1486196>>1486192>>1486197How do you peak normie women then and make them arrive at my “uncomfortable> because stares> because body part showing>cover it” which everyone conveniently ignored was my solution as a NORMIE, and did not make me think society would collapse and take women’s rights away all of a sudden just because I refused to partake in my own sexualization anymore? Oh right, because women are brainwashed to seek out male validation too. So what’s so wrong with hating women that pretend that’s not what they’re doing and make a show out of getting what they wanted. My gosh
No. 1486218
>>1486207Their whole thing is they have black and white thinking, and they think everyone else does too. So anons saying
>A lot of women wear things for the male gaze (something we all understand is normal and pervasive and socially ingrained). Some of them pretend they don't know why men are looking at them, while also filming themselves as they complain, posting thirst traps in the same clothes and selling nudes on OF (meaning they know what's going on). That's pretty cringe, yeah?becomes
>Women are LITERALLY asking to be RAPED by wearing SLUTTY CLOTHES all the time they are so STUPID unlike us totally based RADFEMSAnd their reaction is "Omg so you don't realize we all live in a society?? You're all so fucking dumb ugh, you are literally
victim blaming right now, blah blah islamic niqab". Just extreme jumps. We all know that patriarchy encourages certain things, choices don't exist in vacuums. That doesn't mean we can't roll our eyes at some things or talk about how it can be hypocritical or self-contradictory.
No. 1486221
>>1486216but its not that difficult to understand that wearing revealing clothing will get you looks and attention in public not even from men but from people that wondering why someone would wear that outside. Tell me one reason why a woman would go outside half naked that isn't to do with hot temperature. Literally WHY. These clothes are used for ATTENTION. If you do not want attention why do you wear revealing clothes? spaz out and get
triggered cos a human looks at you in real life? is it cos you can't charge like o OF? LOL.
No. 1486226
>>1486218I’d have more respect for those women if they just owned it
> Some of them pretend they don't know why men are looking at them, while also filming themselves as they complain, posting thirst traps in the same clothes and selling nudes on OF This did actually happen? Because if so sounds like fetish-y content made for their consumers. Men love circlejerking so seeing live footage or whatever of normie men gawking is approval they crave. Like “oh they also find her attractive, nice”. Men that pay for content especially are cucks like that
No. 1486240
>>1486233I know normie women. I have normie woman friends. I have never once heard them say anything like "I wear this because guys love checking me out when I wear it". Not once. Normie women do like to get male attention, this isn't some "normie women love the patriarchy and want all feminist to kill themselves" thing, they want this male attention because that's what they have been groomed into wanting and because they are straight women, and you generally do like to receive attention from attractive members of the sex you're attracted to. I don't doubt that there are normie women who do have male attention at the forefront of their minds, but to many women this is not even a passing thought. They dress like that because they want to be trendy and they want clothes that are deemed cute or attractive.
All I am saying is that many normie women are not explicitly going out of their way to appeal to men. That is just what society tells them to do, that is what they see the women around them do, that is what they see the women on tv do, so in a lot of cases it becomes a "monkey see monkey do" situation where they don't really question WHY they do it, they just do it because all the women around them do it and that's all they have known. Not all women are able to actually take a thoughtful look at the society around them.
No. 1486245
>>1486240No one’s gonna say that outright,
nonnie. Are you autistic and don’t understand social norms?
No. 1486254
>>1486245Are
you autistic? I am literally describing social norms in my post. Social norms are not something that are at the forefront of your mind unless you are autistic. You don't think "oh jeez oh gosh I HAVE to look at them in the eye when I speak to them oh jeez oh gosh" you don't (if you aren't autistic) because it's just expected of you to look people in the eyes as you speak to them. Much like how society expects young women to dress in tighter, more revealing clothes.
No. 1486259
>>1486235On one hand, you sound like a disgusting bourgeois, on the other,
indeed?
No. 1486285
>>14862671. Maybe they actually don't notice men staring (out with friends, live in a small town, etc)
2. Maybe they've had bad experiences with men but do not equate the reasoning to be how they're dressed (men will harrass and assault women no matter how they dress or look)
4. Maybe they understand it but also realize that when they stop putting effort into looking conventionally attractive,
everyone, not just men, ignores them or treat them coldly or rudely
>>1486268You misconstrue "not thinking critically" with infantilizing or assuming they're retarded. It's not assuming them to be retarded if every normie person is already kind of retarded and just goes along with the status quo. You're overestimating the critical thinking skills of normie women*
*normie women being straight women who don't read feminist theory or browse anonymous imageboards
No. 1486295
>>1486243Yeah, it was a little harsh I suppose, but it's the truth.
I think that's why in wealthy areas housewives are more confident to go out running in firm fitting revealing gear. They'll get male attention but it's manageable, safer form of male attention. But in the areas with state housing, some feeble brained Chris Chan type will come out and just try to start a conversation over and over again.
>>1486266But that's literally how humans create with imagination. Scholastic Philosophers 1,000 years ago clicked on that there's nothing truly original that humans can create, it's all just a combination of things they've perceived through their life. Like a unicorn is just a combination of horse and horn.
No. 1486312
>>1486260Kinda agree. I was dancing to songs like My Humps and Don't Cha as a kid and wanted to dress like the women in the videos because I thought they were cool and popular. I was in no way thinking of enticing disgusting males. But if I was allowed to dress like that back then I wouldn't even be aware of that reality, that I'd be looked at in a sexual way.
As a grown woman, maybe its still possible to have a bit of the unintentional ignorance that happens when you see a cute outfit, but you do know the effect it has, just might underestimate the extent. It's kind of like people having bad eyebrows for years and later they ask why no one told them they looked fucked. You get blind to how you come across. Knowing some of those women who dress sexy every day everywhere, they really think everyday women dress hideous and depressing. They don't think something can look good unless it's revealing and everything looks frumpy to them.
No. 1486313
>>1486268I guess women who wear pyjama pants actually just want moids to oogle at them, since there can't possibly be any other reason to wear them.
kys
No. 1486324
File: 1675124706262.jpeg (42.17 KB, 275x274, 1650405097542.jpeg)
We wouldn't have to talk about men oogling us for showing any kind of skin if we just started mass genociding them.
No. 1486325
File: 1675124721498.jpeg (56.57 KB, 580x580, m_5a8a725f9d20f090ffe258a5.jpe…)
>>1486313My pyjamas pants look like picrel, i would freeze otherwise
No. 1486349
>>1486341I saw that typo
nonny.
No. 1486351
>>1486343>Also you’re wearing them in your own home Nice excuse, we all know you want men to oogle you through the windows or else you would cover up your legs down to the ankles you whore. Don't forget your socks too.
>>1486349you can keep it
No. 1486453
Damn, some of you would fit nicely in the tradthot/pick me threads. Congrats on not wearing revealing clothing, this is probably the case for the majority of anons here, the real question is why do you feel compelled to demean the women who do while making excuses for men? A lot of educated men are perfectly capable of not chimping out whenever they see a woman in a revealing outfit. If you think it's in men's nature to make women uncomfortable and ogle at them, then why even fight things like sexism, rape, paraphilias? It's in their ""nature"" too. We should probably all stay home and live under sharia law to protect ourselves from men's nature. Oh wait, in the countries where women do live like this, they have it even worse. I agree that Western society is definitely too sexualized and pornified but blaming 20yo women who wear yoga pants for it and only expecting them to change is retarded.
Also, you can accuse women of dressing a certain way for male validation but in turn they will accuse you of putting women down for male validation and it is true that there are plenty of men who would praise you for covering yourself and insulting those who don't. I understand challenging women on their lack of critical thinking and pointing it out when they embarrass themselves, but I can't fathom talking about them like a coombrained religious moid would. Just why?
No. 1486474
>>1486407>calling generation software ai means you can call any software an ai.AI doesn't really have a specific definition, AI gets defined as "what humans can do but computers can't", and as soon as a computer becomes good at something, that's removed from being a sign of intelligence.
>>1486426Automation doesn't typically affect the top tier of talent in a given industry. There's still tailors making custom clothes and still woodcarvers making luxury products, even if there is thousands of automated clothing factories and thousands of milling machines carving wood down to certain products. You can even find the odd blacksmith making specific metal products.
People that say that the top tier artists are better than automated art are sort of missing the point. This stuff will be used by your average D&D nerd wanting to make a custom character, or a poster promoting a new product. Concept art can be streamlined by churning out thousands and selecting the best. It's pretty much the printing press for the creative process, it definitely speeds it all up.
No. 1486478
>>1486453Well done for being stupid enough to think moids will suddenly turn in the perfect little gentlemen someday after millenias of degeneracy that is still on going.
I hate to break it to you but not a single damn thing has been accomplished in that department. If a moid wants to rape or molest somebody, they will do it no matter what laws tell them not to. They will never stop sexualising the things women do, wear what you want and accept they will wank to you regardless if you wear a burqa or a g string. As long as moids keep breathing, you will always have the same problems with them. Stop being stupid.
No. 1486479
File: 1675139891080.jpg (117.8 KB, 850x940, EXtuZY5U8AAc7Kh.jpg)
regarding omegaversefags, I just fail to understand the cognitive dissonance of eroticizing extreme male violence against women as long as the victim is referred to as a "boy" and with "he/him" pronouns
No. 1486544
I'm tired how coomerish literature and entertainment have become and how easily accessible they are to kids. Many of those "YA" and "BookToks books" are fucking spice and smuts a.k.a porn. In some creative communities I'm in, it's like everyone and their pet cockroaches are writing smut (and they act like they're doing something empowering and subversive, despite some of them write the usual
toxic formulas).
>>1486479 Omegaverse just disgust me for whatever reason. IDK it somewhat feels troon-adjacent. Omegaversefag are also equal or worse than the most batshit fujo.
No. 1486589
>>1486479your average mxm smut/mpreg fic is usually just some aiden on the other side of the screen wanting to write fanfic for their 2 favourite male anime characters. i don't think they would ever stop to think about the inherent misogyny of making an omega the weak/breedable one - youre right that its cognitive dissonance but these are people writing a/b/o fics. not an ounce of thought goes into that shit i guarantee you.
i think there's a case to be made that the women writing straight a/b/o fiction should absolutely know better, though. omega buttbabies in mxm are one thing, but seeing women out there writing glorified abuse fics where the alphas get free reign to treat the omega women like human trashbags… its deeply unpleasant
No. 1486619
>>1486615We are special beings, though. We are literally the only animal capable of complex thought. Human beings are a race of super braniacs from a dog's perspective. And even that, jokingly saying "from a dog's perspective", we're the only animal capable of looking from the point of view of another. And even saying that you think we're not special beings is funny because we're the only animals capable of coming to that conclusion, no other animal is capable of thinking that.
I just really like humans and I think we're really cool and I love how people never really seem to change even after thousands and thousands and thousands of years. Not the bad parts but just regular human behaviors and quirks and stuff. Like humans always have had to clean themselves and feed themselves, etc. I'm high right now and I'm rambling kek but yes humans are really cool.
No. 1486628
>>1486605Yes and it doesn't even have to be stupidity imo but simply a lack of efforts. People who "self-diag" adhd, autism or depression do it because it's a convenient excuse for literally anything. The truth is that most people struggle and go through shit but not all of them expect others to treat them differently because of their personal issues.
>>1486614This.
>>1486615>If I need to eat meat to be physically healthyThere are studies that show that you don't
need meat to be healthy. And the difference between you and the lion is that you are aware that there are alternatives, and you are aware of the horror that is industrial farming (for animals which are sentient and feel pain). inb4 vegan jokes, I'm not but I think that their arguments make total sense for people who care about animals. Of course if you don't it doesn't and it's fine but idk why so many people want to "debunk" veganism or whatever instead of just moving on with their lives.
No. 1486629
>>1486628>There are studies that show that you don't need meat to be healthy.Schizo but the reason governments come down hard on meat, especially red meat, is because it's expensive. And if they admitted the truth, that we are healthiest with a 50%+ meat diet, then suddenly they'd be in trouble as poor people can't afford to eat that much meat. All the pensions, welfare and minimum wages would have to go up to suit.
Try a mostly meat diet and see how you feel. For me personally it just solved my weight issues entirely, I still eat root vegetables but cutting most grains out of my diet did wonders.
No. 1486631
>>1486619other species are highly intelligent though. being human blinds us to the complexities of other species, because we can only see ourselves and our own 'superiority'. but humans got here where we are today because conditions on earth have allowed us to flourish, while our early competitors e.g neanderthals were threatened and died out. our position here is perilous, i dont think for a second we can as a species afford the kind of pride to call ourselves superior . humans are literally in the process of ruining our one and only planet for fucks sake
>>1486629>And if they admitted the truth, that we are healthiest with a 50%+ meat diet, then suddenly they'd be in trouble as poor people can't afford to eat that much meat.[citation needed]
No. 1486639
>>1486631>other species are highly intelligent thoughI'm very interested in other species developing their intelligence, and even then, I think its quite delusional to even imply that there's someone at our level, to be
quite honest
>but humans got here where we are today because conditions on earth have allowed us to flourish while our early competitors e.g neanderthals were threatened and died outThat's a way of totally diminishing our efforts and survival abilities, like shit "just happened" and that was not the case at all
No. 1486642
>>1486639i don't think its delusional. sure it might be implausible that there's a species out there that's more intelligent than us, but again we use our own human metrics of intelligence. how would we know? i also think its interesting to consider that many intelligent species that we know of e.g dolphins might be able to surpass our human intelligence, if only they were put under the right circumstances to do so.
and i definitely don't want to diminish humanities ability to adapt and survive. its something i admire. i just think that, as with all evolution, early humans were at the time the best suited to their conditions, and thus able to adapt and eventually thrive. who is to say that if the dinosaurs hadn't been wiped out, we wouldn't today be seeing societies of sentient and cultured dinosaur descendants instead of our current human ones?
anyway nonna i don't want to fight with you, it's nice to see optimism about humanity tbh
No. 1486672
>>1486628>you don't need meat to be healthyI feel much better and have more energy when I eat meat though. The best is to eat meat or fish at lunch and some vegetables and salad for dinner. I genuinely think I'd ruin my health on a vegan diet
>>1486609Humans are highly intelligent, but also extremely nasty and greedy. It's ironic because we came so far and survived thanks to our ancestors who cared for their fellow tribe members and protected each other, but somehow we ended up with a system based on selfishness and the only way to win is by backstabbing and manipulating other people. I feel like we aren't meant to live in such a big society and would fare better in smaller groups where everyone can take care of each other. But at this point that's never gonna happen unless we kill all the rich overlords
No. 1486684
File: 1675166908104.jpeg (37.84 KB, 400x400, 1633979523814.jpeg)
>>1486628>you don't need meat to be healthyWhile this can be true, the level of nutritional understanding required is beyond the vast majority of people. Not only does it require knowledge of nutrition, it also takes an immense amount of effort and it's not cost effective. Not eating meat is a luxury afforded to rich westerners that can rely on imported ingredients and is not plausible for anyone who doesn't live in a developed consumer economy.
>>1486658pic rel
No. 1486703
>>1486701nona is right,moids dont care what the
victim is wearing, is your brain so rotten you cant understand that?
No. 1486718
>>1486673It's badly worded but I meant that humans are aware that there are alternatives for them. Obviously there are no alternatives for other animals let alone carnivores. I picked the lion because it was the example used by the other anon.
>>1486684>Not eating meat is a luxuryIdk meat is generally considered expensive, although its price has decreased greatly due to industrial farming (but so has the "quality" of the meat), and people don't realize that a few decades ago it was inconceivable to eat meat for lunch and dinner every day. Veganism aside, some people definitely over-consume it. Things like beans, lentils, etc. are cheaper than meat, tofu is also much cheaper in some Asian countries. But yes, I agree that it takes effort (although it's crazy how much alternatives have developed recently) and that people need to be more careful with their diet if they are vegetarian/vegan (but tbh most people have a very basic understanding of nutrition and have deficiencies even if they eat meat).
No. 1486749
>>1486720>cover up chest and butt at all times and weathers because males are animals>they still think you're "too sexy" >cover up chest, butt, stomach, limps and neck at all times and weathers because males are animals>they still think you're "too sexy" >cover up chest, butt, stomach, limps, neck, hands and hair at all times and weathers because males are animals>they still think you're "too sexy" >cover up chest, butt, stomach, limps, neck, hands, hair, face and eyes at all times and weathers because males are animals>they still think you're "too sexy">nothing left to cover up>hide yourself in house at all times and weathers because males are animals>moids still aren't happy and will still call you a whore for looking out of the windowSuch is the life of a pickme.
No. 1486764
File: 1675176671126.jpg (440.32 KB, 2048x2048, 1500100680315.jpg)
>>1486741this is the stupidest braindead take on veganism ever. just say you don't take personal responsibility for anything in your life and move on.
I'm sorry you're a nihilistic edgelord who gets vaguely annoyed when others aren't the same, Samantha, but not all of us have to live that way.
There's literally nothing wrong with minimizing the harm you do to other living creatures where you can.
Your logic can be twisted to literally fit any shitty decision, too.
>Why not steal and shoplift constantly? Nothing matters in the grand scheme of things. The stores you buy clothes and food from are stealing money from innocent worker's pockets and plundering other countries of natural resources! Not caring at all is better.
>Why not kill cats and dogs for fun? Nothing matters in the grand scheme of things. When you buy clothes made in Chinese sweatshops or support Korean products of any sort, you're literally paying for the workers to buy cat or dog meat anyway. You literally put that money in their pocket. Not caring at all is better.>Why not push pregnant women down stairs? Nothing matters in the grand scheme of things. When you buy an iPhone, you're funding Chinese sweatshops that force pregnant women to work 66 hours and offer them absolutely no safety or job precautions whatsoever. Not caring at all is better.It's so funny, in a past vegan thread some meater said being a vegan is like jerking off. You're jerking yourself off RIGHT NOW if you aren't the worst human you could possibly be, anon.
>>1486684"not eating meat is a luxury afforded only to rich westerners who can rely on imported ingredients" god this is such easily debunkable bullshit. there are entire cities in India where the population are and historically have been completely vegetarian. there are plant-based human tribes and civilizations that have sustained what we'd consider "vegan" diets and don't eat meat that have existed throughout history without issue since the beginning of time. plenty of meaters don't have basic nutritional knowledge and sustain themselves purely off of chicken nuggets and spite yet you write off an entire diet based on non-harm because…you think people who mindfully consume what they consume won't do so in a way to guarantee they're meeting their nutrition needs? sounds silly. just say you're too lazy to do the bare minimum in critical thinking when it comes to basic plant based nutrition and go.
>>1486740so "superior" that within less than 300 years of western "civilization" we've transformed every 5 minutes into a McDonalds drive-thru, have poisoned all of our crops and water with microplastic contamination, and are so superior we rely on a food system built on mass rape and slaughter of the same 5 species as we rape our planet into the ground? a species can be capable of higher intelligence yet still not be "superior" in any means of the way. it's like european settlers calling those they colonized "savages" all while raping little girls and sacrificing their own babies when times got tough. pure delusion and a fake high horse.
a 1 year old pig is as intelligent as a 5 year old human child, but at least a 1 year old pig doesn't pay for other sentient creatures to be round up, slaughtered, tortured and wrapped in plastic just for its 1 moment of pleasure to shit out. sounds like a superior species to me.
No. 1486766
File: 1675176764521.png (1.4 MB, 1500x992, Screenshot 2023-01-31 at 3.52.…)
>>1486684eh…not every culture relies on meat to survive and there are plenty of examples of civilizations/countries, mainly in asia or africa, that do not consume as much meat as we do and/or rely on vegetable-based dishes like in the case of certain indian states, at all. the issue with the average western diet is overproduction and lack of nutrients in the soil which infuses vegetables and fruits with more flavor, vitamins, and nutrients. like vegetables you raise in your own garden, with good, dense, dark soil taste a million times different than the average veg you pick up at the grocery store. they even smell different, in fact they smell mouthwateringly delicious, like tomatoes vine-ripened in the sun, or in the case of homegrown strawberries, they have this intense fragrance and flavor that permeates in the air which really draws you in.
i feel like the primary issue with vegetables and westerners is that they don't legitimately don't taste good because they're farmed shittily, people do not know how to cook with vegetables so they steam or sautee the fuck out of them so they become mushy, and the flavor of meat becomes addictive instead of properly learning how to season your food with spices. mushrooms give off a meatiness to vegetarian dishes due to the breakdown of amino acids in cooking, and you can even add soy aminos or that yellow yeast shit to your food to give off a beefy/umami flavor. sauce: someone who was raised seventh day adventist and grew up eating all kinds of vegetarian foods/learning all the tricks to substitute for meat in dishes.
https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-what-happens-when-rural-africans-eat-an-american-diet-for-2-weeks No. 1486808
>>1486795If shins and ankles are indecent in every other place but america then maybe everywhere else is backwards kek. Men are allowed to be topless and men are allowed to show their shins and ankles and men are allowed to harrass and assault women based on what those women where wearing and it's fine because that slut knew what she was doing in the first place!
>>1486801Yep, moid bait. I bet everyone reeing about bimbos and sluts and onlyfans whores are moids as well.
No. 1486809
>>1486800NTA but you've been at this for a full day now. I don't know what about "Revealing clothes will attract scrote attention" is so
triggering for you, but enough. No one is saying women who cover up never get attacked or harassed, or that countries like Afghanistan are safe for women just because everyone's covered up, these are insane strawmans. Just please live in reality.
No. 1486825
File: 1675179236641.jpeg (340.77 KB, 1152x1536, A62DD1FB-653C-497F-824C-1735CC…)
>>1486822No one said that, but policing and demeaning women’s bodies and clothes in a moid leaning way isn’t feminism either.
No. 1486829
>>1486823The moids itt baiting keep saying that anons itt are libfem cocksuckers who think it's feminist to wear "slutty bimbo" clothes.
>>1486824I know this, just dressing a certain way is not indicative of whether a woman is a feminist.
>>1486825Yes, I know this.
No. 1486831
File: 1675179557134.jpeg (177.05 KB, 1000x1000, 1930AD79-5E65-4D7D-AC6C-42FE9E…)
>>1486817>>1486820Are you dumb or just playing dumb? You really can’t imagine revealing clothes?
No. 1486839
File: 1675179933211.jpg (13.19 KB, 540x360, ARM.jpg)
>>1486825>>1486829I agree with you, as someone who has been slut-shamed for showing my arms i cant help but get a feeling that these are the same type of people who when they get what they want they then push for more (oh now you started dressing how i want well its not enough now i want you to cover your ankle and arms too and then when you cover that up too then its still not enough and then you need to cover up more) women are seen as dirty the moment they are born ITS THE REASON WHY RAPE IS MOST COMMON IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES, because they see women as the dirtiest there and there was even a picture of a group of men staring down a woman in those countries just because she was wearing sandals that showed her toes even though her whole body was hidden.
No. 1486847
>>1486831people dont even wear that casually. Most women wear that for raves and clubbing,girls night and not for normal occasions.
You literally sound like a fucking loser incel neet who rarely goes outside or meets people.
Or maybe you got rejected by one of the whores you tried to fuck at a nightclub boo hoo how sad.
No. 1486852
File: 1675180464870.jpg (46.84 KB, 593x360, Screenshot 2023-01-31 165128.j…)
No. 1486853
File: 1675180500732.jpg (119.99 KB, 1005x638, 9qs9u.jpg)
>>1486852something tells me these are the type of moids baiting.
No. 1486855
File: 1675180603952.jpg (172.3 KB, 1065x847, odj3ojd.jpg)
>>1486853>>1486854these are the type of men you are now replying to
No. 1486858
>>1486855>>1486852>>1486853>some random nigga on twitter is every lolcow poster who disagrees with meShould someone post idiotic libfems or weird male feminists talking about "free the nipple ladiesss hehe" from the same website and say that's anons in the other side of this argument?
Also, can you find anons here saying these fucked up things like "men can't control their dicks"? The first screenshot at least had some resemblance to the people you're arguing with, but the rest are ridiculous moid shit. Do you want to argue with the moid instead? Just go there.
No. 1486861
>>1486858>oh i agree with the first things the moid is saying but not with the rest so its moid shit.you cant cherry pick what you want you dumb bitch.
Mad that most people who share the same opinions as you are just like that moid or weird middle aged women who blame underage girls for their creep husbands being attracted to them.
Cope and seethe.
No. 1486865
>>1486486Here
>>1486858>the problem is that you and a lot of anons actually believe they will ever evolve. You just have to deal with it.Here
>>1486268>you have to be literally braindead not to understand that moids will most likely be looking at you or act wild. >act wild. No. 1486868
>>1486862im not him and the mods can check my ip and my posts, the only one who sounds like a moid here is you. You are so bothered over what women wear that you have been arguing with multiple anons over with it for days.
Also imagine getting mad at the b word but then dictating what women wear. The hypocrisy is huge.
No. 1486872
>>1486764>have been completely vegetarianKey word here being "vegetarian. Indians still consume eggs and dairy even if they don't eat meat.
>there are plant-based human tribes and civilizations that have sustained what we'd consider "vegan" diets and don't eat meat that have existed throughout history without issue since the beginning of timeNo there aren't. This is a repeat of the previous tinfoil thread where the same conclusion was reached.
>plenty of meaters don't have basic nutritional knowledge and sustain themselves purely off of chicken nuggets and spite yet you write off an entire diet based on non-harmThe standard western diet is bad, just as the average vegan diet is bad because neither groups of people know anything about nutrition and some can't even cook for themselves.
>plenty of meaters don't have basic nutritional knowledge and sustain themselves purely off of chicken nuggets and spite yet you write off an entire diet based on non-harmExplain how a vegan would meet their daily requirement of EAAs.
>so "superior" that within less than 300 years of western "civilization" we've transformed every 5 minutes into a McDonalds drive-thruNot every country is America
>have poisoned all of our crops and water with microplastic contaminationAnd the solution to this is to continue to dump
toxic, carcinogenic pesticides, herbicides and artificial fertilizer into fields so people can eat plants right? Or maybe the solution is a cow left to pasture where it reliably shits out free organic fertilizer.
No. 1486873
>>1486865i just hope posters like these are moids and not radfems. Because lately its getting hard to tell the difference due to the misogyni spewed on this site this past two years and then hiding behind the 'radfem' label.
Some of the radfem posters are reaching handmaiden conservative
victim-blaming level, and even the most popular thread in 2x being a right-wing one shows that.
It just shows how pickmes will use any movement to their agenda to hate on other women.
No. 1486880
>>1486865Idgi, those posters are saying men are retarded and shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt. How is that the same as saying men "cannot control their dicks"? They can, they just choose not to. They are subhuman and will attack us regardless of what we wear at the end of the day. It's also true that clothes deemed "revealing" will typically also get more catcalls and general harassment because moids think it means "Come flirt with me" or "I'm easy", depending on where you live or go. It's not justified, but denying it happens would be delusional.
All the weird mouth-foaming and high testosterone aggression going on has me convinced this was some bad faith moid derailing and projecting his Y chromosome. No actual women feel so victimized about other women not liking some kinds of clothes (and before he starts his ape-screeching again, I wear whatever I want, I'm just not delusional enough to think me wearing shorts and me wearing baggy jeans gets the exact same treatment from scrotes lol).
No. 1486882
>>1486880Samefag Do you get the difference between
>husband murdered wife>husband murdered wife after she filed for divorce.Genuine question?
No. 1486887
>>1486873This is my first post on the subject.
It's not misogynist to advise other women to protect themselves against men. In a perfect world women would be able to wear whatever they wanted without having to worry about the consequences of moid attention. We don't live in a perfect world and have to be very aware of men for our own safety.
No. 1486889
>>1486882>>1486885Stop giving 'her' attention. He/she is probably salivating over the replies they are getting. Just ignore the retard.
Also calling everyone a libfem or a troon just because we think you are wrong for thinking its womens fault for men acting wild makes you look retarded.
No. 1486900
>>1486893>not reading all that shitBecause you know you have no argument against it kek. Equating
me to a tranny because I'm not singing you praises for your opinion is equally retarded. Pot, kettle.
No. 1486903
>>1486893Take your sonic card proudly. Kek
You’d get more across if you stopped passively blaming women for men’s behavior. Safe keeping women and helping them before bad things happen? Great. Shaming them and complaining about them when something bad happens? Bad. Not holding men accountable for their actions? Bad. I don’t give a shit if a women is in her birthday suit. If a scrote rapes her. He still breaks the law and deserves to get railroaded.
No. 1486906
>>1486899They did say this
Look at the links in this post
>>1486865 No. 1486909
>>1486896Exactly, it's such basic knowledge. A mentally ill poster is shitting up the thread, samefagging hard and insisting everyone is some scrote he/she got into a fight with on Twitter last week.
Anyone who tries to talk sense to that person gets accused of being their nemesis, and they sperg even harder. Whoever this is cannot think in anything but extremes.
(saying this while shitting up this thread and others ) No. 1486927
>>1486914The fat removal on the face is going to age very very poorly. It makes me sad for them and the amount of abuse their skin is going through is going to thin it over time probably leading to really sensitive skin. Permanent fillers migrate over time. Etc etc. silicon implants are getting pulled again. BBL’s are the most dangerous surgery and can lead to long term issues later.
It’s all so Frankenstein to a group that’s so young. I hate it.
No. 1486936
File: 1675184571087.jpg (4.47 KB, 166x182, 41A1L8 1bkS.__AC_SR166,182___.…)
>>1485850Love how the replies to your post are "OMG so you're saying we have to wear niqabs? And that if we wear butthole scrunch leggings we're asking to get raped?"
I'm no prude, I'll wear low cut tops and tight outfits. But I'm not gonna give death stares or scream at moids when they look. Pic rel is just ridiculous. Literally no one buys this to not get looked at. This is the pants version of buying a padded push up bra. It's not like this is some kind of cool fashion style and wearing it is a way to express yourself, its only design is looking as sexual as possible.
No. 1486938
>>1486914I don't think most of gen Z is getting Botox or plastic surgery, that costs a lot of money. It's just something being pushed by media.
>>1486936Agreed.
No. 1486948
>>1486938I've known numerous gen z who have gotten filler, idk how wide spread it is tbh.
>>1486942Act wild is a very vague term. It could include cat calling and yelling. I've seen it happen many times, but tbf i feel like when you have a certain body type you will attract that attention no matter what you wear.
>>1486941Be realistic anon.
No. 1486949
>>1486945Wasn't this the original example
>>1485385 ?
No. 1486950
>>1486941I'm all for shitting on males, but you should feel silly if you spend time out of your day wrangling your tits into a stuffed uncomfortable push up bra only to throw a fit when someone looks at your carefully curated cleavage. I'll say as a bisexual person, if a good looking woman is wearing a super tight sexed up outfit, I'll automatically be drawn to it and look. No, not stare.
Excesssive staring for several seconds to the point where they're close to licking their damn lips, is another thing.
No. 1486957
>>1486950why does almost every pickme always pull the bisexual card, even shoeonhead also claims to be bisexual.
Like no one gives a shit if you glance at a woman for a second that is in no way comparable to the animalistic stares and actions that men give.
No. 1487007
>>1486453>the real question is why do you feel compelled to demean the women who do while making excuses for men? Lel who's defending moids here? I've seen calls for the mass culling of moids and ones complaining about how there's no moid bulge and ass, disappointment that it isn't more normalized that moids are humiliated and degraded regularly as a societal expectation in tight spandex with their bodies on display.
Moids are pathetic and deviant fuck ups but that doesn't mean women should embody moid patriarchal standards. No one is
victim blaming young women for serious inhuman acts like rape and abuse but we are all aware of those harmful
toxic standards that moids have made to keep women in line. There's been back and forth arguments ITT if normie women are aware of this, in truth they would be in some way. You're made acutely aware that you are an object as a women from the age of seven or so with how disgusting moids are. So I align with the comments that argue that these scrunch wearing ass women know what they are doing; dressing like this is an act of capitulation to patriarchal standards for appeasement, like any other act of
toxic femininity and it garners rewards to those who do, whether they are trad pickmes or libfem pickmes. Each appease a patriachical ideal.
If you embody patriachical standards to an absurd degree (dressing male gazey, dragging down other women for being impure etc.) expect some resistance from women who disagree with the default coomer patriachical male gaze and trad grooming.
You are rewarded for obeying the rules of patriarchy from dressing for the male gaze, not punished so the 20 year old in question you're strawmanning about embodies this.
You're argument reeks of libfem dogshit misrepresenting a moderate position as being trad. No one mentioned trad shit as this is a moderate issue. Some anons have jokingly brought up burqas, but you know well that Sharia Law is not protective of womens rights lel so I don't know what you're getting at there. You know it's an overstatement to argue the anons here want fucking sharia.
Women dressing for the male gaze exclusively are feeding into a
toxic system of patriarchy that hurts all women whether you like that or not. This has nothing to do with trad shit, and this isn't a trad opinion just because the default is coomer male gaze shit.
People having decency is not trad lel. Trad pickmes want to uphold the patriarchy as much as libfems and be picked, libfems work within the system as "sex positive" handmaidens degrading themselves with scrunch ass skin-tight pants and chastising other women who don't want to wear scrunch ass pants.
Radfems question the patriachy and seek to abolish it knowing that both sides are two sides of the same coin. Tradfems, libfems, and radfems each have little in common other than all being women.
(enough derailing over this) No. 1487027
File: 1675190822618.jpeg (Spoiler Image,72.28 KB, 602x602, main-qimg-24f77338348cc090f53c…)
people who do weightlifting are ugly and inferior, people who do any other exercise or sport are far more superior and healthy.
Weightlifter lack stamina and endurance in almost everything and most of them have too much fat on them and have turtle abs.
Fuck weightlifters, you ugly losers.
No. 1487034
>>1487030at the end of the day they have no waist, turtle abs, are angry at anything, bulky to the point where they look fat, bad health, every other sport beats them when it comes to stamina.
Also why are people in that sport sector so angry like everyone is no matter the gender . i dont know if its the stereoids or just people who are bulky just naturally have anger issues.
No. 1487050
>>1486957Idk if that was a rhetorical question or not but my personal theory on why the full "I'm an antifeminist" type pickmes or even a lot of libfems claim to be bi is that I think it's almost like an elaborate cope to deal with the sexualization of women without having to acknowledge and feel bad about all of the oppression of women carried out through the oversexualization. They don't have to feel bad wondering things like "why is it not socially acceptable and pushed for for men to wear sexy clothes?" to "why are the few men that do wear sexy clothes gay or instantly assumed/ridiculed as being gay?" to "why do men seem to think the idea of themselves dressing sexy would be demeaning?" and to "Has it actually been demeaning this whole time for women to wear these things too?"
Instead they are able to brush off any possibility of these feelings cropping up with some hand wave like "well women's bodies are just naturally more appealing and I'm bi anyway so I'm fine with it I like looking at all the sexy women in media and irl too"
Also I'll preface I'm not one of the anons reeing about women dressing sexy, my problem is specifically on the fact society views it necessary for women to present attractively to gain social value but that the concept of men putting excessive effort into their looks is not only unnecessary for them to gain respect, but along with other moid views of them doing anything that women would like, other men disrespect them for doing it.
No. 1487053
>>1487039hey this is a stupid question but can a underage person also get their hands on steroids, im asking this because when i was in high school i knew a girl who was into weightlifting and her voice became just like the ones i see on girls that take testosterone or steroids, she also had anger issues and tried to beat up people for no reason and had weird abs.
>>1487046because everyone is done and tired of talking about this since this has been talked for days on this thread with infighting and bait, you just want the trolls to keep on infighting with you.
No. 1487061
>>1487057you come as tone deaf but i understand what you are trying to say and i agree.
Ive kind of noticed that most people have less empathy when a ugly woman is raped. Most people say she should be thankful or that she is lying, but when its a pretty girl more people show sympathy wanting justice for her.
No. 1487075
File: 1675192772378.jpeg (35.79 KB, 430x528, C5F26A47-E7AE-49D3-B363-145285…)
>>1487061I was watching this story about the me too movement on tv and my male relatives were laughing because they couldn’t believe one of the
victims got sexually assaulted because she’s ugly
No. 1487095
File: 1675193225099.jpeg (154.49 KB, 998x948, F4ABFDEA-F24B-4446-84D9-A9409D…)
Voyager has the exact same vibe as TNG and anyone who hates Voyager but loves TNG is misogynist plain and simple. But why do people hate Neelix? Also Janeway is gorgeous
No. 1487126
Ok fr im going to be genuine here.
Beauty standards shouldn't fluctuate, this only benefits a fast moving market and hurts not only the environment, but women's self esteem. The only beauty standard and ideal that should be celebrated is health, whether that's slightly lanky, or a little squishy, it's better to be able to run far and live healthily with crooked teeth than to have perfect teeth, whilst vaping and consuming excess sugar. Aesthetics, such as the clean girl aesthetic, or any aesthetic that celebrates health should be encouraged. No BBLs, no carcinogenic tanning, just health. I don't think this opinion is unpopular here but it is outside this site.
No. 1487274
>>1487255100% agree. i remember seeing this tiktok once of a goth with an all white wardrobe and all the comments were arguing about it not being goth bc its not dark colours. like?? oh i guess you can be dressed up in ghostly clothes but bc its not dark colours, youre a normie now. where is the critical thinking?
also on a tangent, the term 'alt fashion' used to really bother me bc its used exclusively to refer to dark/edgy fashion, and worse still its usually just used to mean someone who wears dark eyeliner and has piercings. i wish the term was more of an umbrella to encompass different substyles.
No. 1487328
>>1487043more based and and radpilled than any trad seething about muh stacies setting us back. we'd be breaking olympic records if these women spent time lifting over reeing about beauty standards and "slut" shaming politics
>>1487056KEK
No. 1487385
File: 1675211373145.jpg (214.68 KB, 1069x1049, 8bc.jpg)
>>1487344its been like 2 days of consecutive sperging can you please stfu
No. 1487390
>>1487344you must be a loser neet, and i dont even mean this a insult, i genuinely think you are one for this to be something that important for you to sperg for days about.
You bitch about clothes and some people bitch about the gross odor coming from your body as they slowly distance themselves away from you, go take a shower and maybe a real job.
No. 1487393
>>1487325i really had to dig through tiktok bc i saw this like 2 years ago but i think i found it
https://www.tiktok.com/@irisinwhite/video/7036630155070246191?lang=enfair warning its a she/they channel and she's kind of cringe as are the comments on this, i like some of her older outfits though
No. 1487512
>>1486764Based
>>1486872>And the solution to this is to continue to dump toxic, carcinogenic pesticides, herbicides and artificial fertilizer into fields so people can eat plants right? Or maybe the solution is a cow left to pasture where it reliably shits out free organic fertilizer.You do realize that to produce the shit ton of meat that people consume + plants for both cattle and human consumption, this little fantasy of relying solely on the cows being left to pasture and shitting organic fertilizer is completely unrealistic, right? Most farm animals don't even see the light of day anymore. Of course we should strive for a more sustainable, less
toxic agriculture, regardless of meat consumption. But for now, all these pesticides/herbicides/artificial fertilizers are used to grow plants for human consumption AND for cattle (which itself requires tons of resources and space and is full of drugs), so at the very least if we didn't consume meat anymore it would be one less step in the chain and less resources used because all the crops would be for humans directly. Of course I know it's not realistic for the whole world to be vegan, I'm just saying that acting like eating soy is somehow more
toxic and resource-consuming than eating a cow that has been fed soy is nonsensical.
No. 1487513
>>1486235I agree with your points
nonnie, but I don't have that option right now.
No. 1487659
File: 1675248009993.png (278.49 KB, 600x781, Atrazine_USA_2011.png)
>>1487512I don't know why people, especially Americans don't understand this. There is zero reason to factory farm livestock except for increased profit. Humans have been keeping animals as livestock for meat, milk and other products such as leather for thousands of years. It's completely sustainable and animals are an essential part of agricultural land management. Traditional farming methods require a farmer to change what a field is used for each season. Growing crops in a field depletes the soil, so after crops have been grown in a field, the next season the farmer will leave the field to pasture for livestock which replenishes the soil. Fields can also be left to meadow so hay can be harvested in the autumn, which also replenishes the soil. Most livestock require nothing but grass. A cow or sheep takes something that is not edible and turns it into highly nutritious fat and protein.
Intensive agriculture and factory farming are very recent developments that were utilized after WWII to overcome food shortages. In that time humans have used increasingly
toxic chemicals and ever greater amounts of artificial fertilizer to overcome the environmental degradation caused by non-traditional farming methods. Veganism only accelerates this because it removes the livestock that have kept agriculture sustainable for thousands of years.
No. 1487667
File: 1675249586522.jpg (43 KB, 304x380, a9b83d593d.jpg)
"Women only like bad boys" is an excuse/cope average and ugly man use to pretend (or refuse to) to fact the truth, that most women are attracted to tall, young, lean guys who have pretty/handsome faces
No. 1487707
>>1487705People associate someone being nice to them with being desperate. Men and women like the adrenaline rush of dealing with someone who is a little
abusive and cruel.
No. 1487727
>>1487707There’s a psychological component too. Your brain chemistry gets all fucked up in the love bombing cycle. People get addicted to their
toxic abusive partners.
No. 1487731
File: 1675259680604.gif (1.62 MB, 498x281, areyou.gif)
>>1487692Aren't those experts just worried that the birth rate is going down in certain countries?
No. 1487892
>>1487880absolutely retarded take. any bare minimum critical thinking or analysis or knowledge of America either currently as a country or historically as the 300yr old experiment it is shows utter human failure and incompetence, both on a social and nationwide political level. this take is supreme mental gymnastics and coping, but I guess that's the level of cognitive dissonance and delusion the average American needs to be in in order to find things "fine and dandy".
Furthermore, playing oppression olympics and trying to say "it's not so bad here, look at third world shitholes, they have REAL problems" as a way to cope and ignore the problems that have and continue to plague Burgerland is such a cheap cop out for any bare minimum thinking or self awareness.
You literally live in a country where billionaire YouTubers have to cover the medical procedures your healthcare won't. You have more American citizens unable to afford a roof over their head and closer to homelessness than they are closer to owning a home in their LIFETIMES. You have militarized police working for your political elite and rich who are legally allowed to gun down anyone in the streets, regardless of if they have a weapon or not, regardless of if theyve done anything or not, under the guise of "fearing for their lives" = aka not a real "right to bare arms" for anyone when police can just shoot you and say you had or didn't have a gun and get away with it regardless. Just because there are people who have it "worse out there" doesn't mean these problems don't exist, it just means you've stuck your fingers in your ears and have deluded yourself enough to tell yourself this is fine and normal for a developed country because the American bar has dropped so very low.
there is a reason the US is looked at as a laughing stock by pretty much every other country, developed or not. and it isn't just the nationwide obesity rate or superficiality or late stage industrial capitalism. it's normalized ignorance like this.
No. 1487959
>>1487892>Furthermore, playing oppression olympics and trying to say "it's not so bad here, look at third world shitholes, they have REAL problems" as a way to copNta, but that's not what oppression Olympics means
>it isn't just the nationwide obesity rateThe last time I checked the US wasn't even in the top 10 fattest countries. Every list is a bit different but you can't deny obesity is a huge problem in a lot of countries.
I agree with most of what you said, though.
No. 1488091
>>1488059Vocaloids are literally just instruments, people use them in different ways and in a variety of genres. They work particularly well in electronic music imo. You could find some good shit if you cared to look for it, like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRSM3WEowJE What I like about it is that it really unleashes producers' creativity since they're not held back by their own vocals, so sometimes you get songs that you would never get anywhere else
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 1488111
>>1488103You literally sound like a 19th century textile worker saying "lol, machine weaved fabrics are so shit, this tech will go nowhere".
>>1487994I think all the talk show hosts are grifting sociopaths but Ellen Degeneres was just less transparent at hiding it. She leaned too much into being empathetic charity giving girl, and it bit her on the ass because the contrast between that and her sociopathic behavior was just too much.
I don't understand how Oprah hasn't been cancelled. Maybe it's because she's black and has that as a shield? Ellen looks and behaves like your stereotypical entitled Karen so there's less sympathy for her.
No. 1488611
File: 1675351850198.webm (138.91 KB, 384x480, 1673192249430.webm)
Love Marina as a singer, but her hips and stomach area look unnatural. I´ve seen plenty of fit women, chubby women and anorexic women irl but this video looks like a plastic doll?
No. 1488629
>>1488617Not to mention, the men who think women should look like airbrushed porn dolls are pathetic limp-dick losers who look at porn and instagirls all day. Imagine ruining your body for the absolute lowest tier of men.
The average woman is beautiful just from doing the bare minimum, imo. It's men who become hideous, doughy, and misshapen when they don't maintain their body through eating right and working out.
No. 1488781
>>1488776anon it takes you 5 minutes to see that most porn for men involves the youthful girl-next-door with minimal makeup getting ''corrupted''.
The ''huge boobs and smoke eyeshadow'' porn meme was something in the early 2000's.
No. 1488794
File: 1675360469261.jpeg (405.53 KB, 1500x1125, 6D294224-777C-41DB-BA02-4E3AFC…)
>>1488788Exactly. Unless you are out here doing visual kei makeup and something most scrotes would find repulsive(pic related)the “I’m expressing myself” line is just a cope.
No. 1488820
>>1488807>>1488806getting this
triggered at the mere suggestion you are doing something (even without realizing it) for men just confirms how true it is. i do makeup and dress up sometimes and i still agree with that anon because she's right. it's a norm that only benefits men and raises unnecessary expectations for women.
>>1488811plastic surgery is just an extention of the same concept which is changing your appearance to conform to some ideal
No. 1488823
>>1488820anons reasonable replies to you are totally
triggered and not you or the other spergs who rehash the same shit in multiple threads everyday.
No. 1488837
>>1488769Having a cute hairstyle and nice clothes is not
that hard. Just say you want to do the bare minimum and go away, some women like to be high maintenance
No. 1488860
>>1488840It's not hard to hear kek but you literally assume that other women who do these things are dumber than you, or somehow beneath you ideologically. That is the implication here. Your thinking is so black and white.
>>1488846Anon suddenly forgot the existence of gay women.
No. 1488880
>>1488797I wear makeup and dress cute but I know deep down I want to appease the patriarchy. Like come on, ask yourself
why why do you want to look so cute?
No. 1488939
Claiming that makeup/fashion is purely for "male validation" understandably upsets anons because it's much more complicated than that. But it's true that almost everything we do in that regard (even when we enjoy it) is due to society's expectations of women and beauty standards, and they would probably have been very different without men. Women's "value" in society is based on appearance much more than men, this is something we all learn very early. Why else would we want to look eternally young, modify our features with makeup or surgery to fit certain standards, follow trends etc.? It's not always for men, but it's also to give a certain impression at work/school, make sure we don't look ridiculous next to other women, etc. Like, if a woman can't go out without make-up, obviously it's not just a personal choice, she feels pressured to look a certain way. Most of it is something we've been conditioned to do, meanwhile men just have to do the bare minimum and are allowed to age.
No. 1489026
>>1488860wtf are you even talking about lmao when did i say any of those things? i literally stated i don't judge women who do makeup and stuff and that i do it myself. i implied nothing like what you said, sorry but you're just projecting your huge inferiority complex rn. it's like you get offended by other women who dare criticize the self destructive meaningless things we're socialized/pressured into doing. when i do that, i'm not talking down to other women or putting myself above them, i'm literally speaking from my own point of view as a woman who has worn/wears makeup.
>>1488880the question we should really ask is, why don't
men wear makeup? literally only homosexual males wear makeup, no straights, unless they're doing some kind of performance or they have a very alternative style (and even in that case it's rare). but yeah it's totally not to attract/appease males. uh huh.
No. 1489933
>>1489670nonna, this looks like some awful dried up conservative moid
the channel's called Odin's Men for fucksake, there has to be better channels for dunking on troons out there
No. 1490094
I can't say this anywhere really, and I'm nervous about saying it here due to fear of being misunderstood. But does it count as an unpopular opinion if I think sterilization for troons of both sexes should be heavily encouraged and easily accessible? Like a hysterectomy for TIFs and a vastectomy for TIMs?
Because, ones with genuine GID wouldn't want to do anything sexual, and TIFs with GID would never want to have children in case of rape, because I can't comprehend not being a fakeboi and having sex. If you truly felt foreign in your body, why would you let people near it?
This would also hopefully discourage people from trying to live out MPreg fetishes or unwanted children from being born. It would also prevent grooming, at least with biological children. If anyone has any other ideas on how to solve this troon shit, have at it.
I'm coming from the perspective that adults should do whatever they want to themselves, as long as it's not taken out of taxes and they accept the possibility of regretting it.
No. 1490289
>>1490279Sometimes I wonder if some of you are even sexually attracted to men, since I see posts like this so often.
I've always considered myself straight because even though I might find a woman and her body attractive, vaginas don't do anything for me at all, and that's obviously an important part of someone's sexual life. If I called myself bi, I'd rightfully get absolutely roasted kek. It's strange to find dicks completely repulsive if you're actually sexually attracted to men.
No. 1490352
File: 1675506765639.jpg (129.96 KB, 1259x839, Banksy_Balloon_Girl_London.jpg)
This nigga fucking sucks. Our local artists on the doodle board make better art than this and no one's paying them millions of dollars.
No. 1490393
>>1490072I cringe so fucking hard when I hear women say how they love feeling protected by their moids because they have big arms uwu.
>>1490117Nta but I consider myself bi only because I'm super into fictional men, I've never been attracted to any guy no matter how conventionally attractive they supposedly are.
No. 1490410
File: 1675516124014.jpg (55.55 KB, 621x480, ds anime.jpg)
people who keep pregnancies with pre-diagnosed disabilities are fucked up people who want access to public funds at the expense of the suffering child. and that includes down syndrome.
i dont feel bad for or give special treatment towards parents with disabled children. there are tests for that. you chose this shit AND are using my tax money for this nonsense.
No. 1490617
>>1490598The fact that a woman who wants to be Varg Vikernes' wife and has hatred for both African and white American (and European) women gets defended by some anons in that thread because she doesn't like one kind of weird hentai is insane to me.
She's into some sort of weird raceplay shit and allegedly posted CP at one point (I didn't see it, but the mods redtexted her and other anons were horrified), she's a degenerate herself. I'm all for fujoshi cringe (because they can be very cringy and cowish, like all fandoms), but the thread is a cesspool. I have two guesses on the kinds of people posting in it 24/7.
No. 1603539
>>1476706Look who the fuck's talkin'!
Pot, meet fuckin' kettle. Need I remind you where you're posting? You're on fuckin' lolcow.farm, literally the one site that shits on normies the most. You DON'T have any options, and saying otherwise would be an outright lie.