File: 1482364954053.jpg (27.61 KB, 534x401, BURNTHECOAL.jpg)
No. 672
>>671It's only a taboo in backward societies where people pretend to be progressive, but in reality are not.
I'm not a 'nigger', black or butthurt: this is the truth. Most places in the civilised world don't care about that type of shit like Americunts do. Date whoever you want.
No. 673
File: 1482384793137.webm (749.07 KB, 640x360, higher education.webm)
It's primarily only white people who care about that.
White people are on a demographic trend to genocide. No other countries but (formerly) white countries are being flooded with immigrants, so for example China doesn't have to worry about one rare case of race-mixing, their country will stay 99% Chinese.
The current levels of non-white immigration and race-mixing will relatively soon genocide white people and leave them with no land of their own. That is why so many of them don't like it. Even non-racist people don't like it, you might have no problems with other races, you just don't want your own people wiped off the face of the planet, that doesn't make you racist.
The only argument against this is "Why should you care about your race being genocided (even though I would never say this about any other race except whites)? Race doesn't mean anything".
There's some of you here who are so entwined with self-hating leftist mentality/propaganda that you actually think this.
No. 678
>>673I disagree with that. Like lol no offense but White genocide is bullshit. I know people who are like 1/8 Asian, and look White af. If they get children with another White person, I think it's fair to just say that kid is White, and not Asian/Black/~le mixed~/whatever. So if you want to increase White race, all you need to do is pull the White mixed people back to the White side.
And btw Asian parents care about it too, but we all know that Asians can actually be pretty damn racist (also towards White people).
No. 684
>>673You think you've had your eyes opened, when in reality you've had the wool pulled over your eyes by like minded right-wing cult idiots. Your horrible, inequivalent example of China is retarded at all levels. The Chinese mix fucking plenty, for one, and HAN Chinese(the ethnic group) is an amalgamation of Asian ethnic groups that have been there for 1000s of years. It's also one of the oldest civilizations on the planet. Of course it's not going to be like fucking America, where there is SOME race mixing. The regugee migration is troubling, but to think it's going to "genocide" "white people" (which is not a homogeneous race or ethnicity, dipshit) is such inane cool aid drinking Nazi garbage.
White people are not endangered, and you white men are not being persecuted.
No. 685
>>678>And btw Asian parents care about it too, but we all know that Asians can actually be pretty damn racist (also towards White people)preach
>>673fucking kek! that's complete bs, but the fact you really believe it is hilarious.
No. 695
>>678>I disagree with that. Like lol no offense but White genocide is bullshit. Saying "it's bullshit" isn't an argument and it doesn't make it not true.
>all you need to do is pull the White mixed people back to the White side. That produces non-white people. A mulatto breeding with a white person does not create a white person.
>>684>You think you've had your eyes opened, when in reality you've had the wool pulled over your eyes by like minded right-wing cult idiots.You're "woke" and I'm not, I know.
>Your horrible, inequivalent example of China is retarded at all levels.Why so? I'm just saying that Chinese don't care as much as white people about race-mixing, because it's relatively a non-issue for them.
Blacks don't care about race-mixing with whites because it's considered an upgrade or achievement for them.
>The regugee migration is troubling, but to think it's going to "genocide" "white people">White people are not endangered,It's not just the European migrant crisis, it's mestizos/natives from Central/South America moving into the US in massive amounts, and breeding extremely fast compared to white people. It's also whites race-mixing with them, and whites not breeding nearly as fast as non-whites.
White people are on a demographic trend to genocide, it will take some time to get there. I know you women have the hardest time thinking this far ahead. The US is only 60% white now, and it's expected to only be 42% white in 2060. Without intervention this downward trend isn't going to stop, it may even surpass the projections.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_racial_and_ethnic_demographics_of_the_United_States#Projections_for_2020_through_2060These are stats pulled from the United States Census Bureau and put on Wikipedia, I say this because you're probably so stupid that you'll try to discredit anything from Wikipedia, but you don't even know how to use the website or what the numbers in brackets after sentences even mean.
You're so near-sighted like a typical woman you say "There's plenty of white men right now, see you're not endangered now, therefor you never will be!".
>white men are not being persecuted.Whites are demonized by leftist society. Look at how you're treating me for being concerned about the survival of my race, even though if I said I was a Native American (or any other race) concerned about keeping my race alive by discouraging race-mixing, you wouldn't say anything because you weren't trained to. When white people do it you throw out hot words like "cool aid drinking Nazi garbage".
>which is not a homogeneous race or ethnicity, dipshitWhite people just don't exist I guess, you really got me.
No. 696
>>672>Most places in the civilised world don't care about that type of shit like Americunts do.You think Japanese or Koreans are more supportive of interracial dating than Americans?
You people need to keep a global context in mind more, 95% of the people outside of Western Europe and America are well, well to the right of Donald Trump in their social views, and that's a fact.
>>684>and HAN Chinese(the ethnic group) is an amalgamation of Asian ethnic groups It's the result of Han male settler colonists in places like Guangdong fucking the local women after driving out the local men.
Hence why the Tang Dynasty explicitly b& marriage between Han females and "dark skinned men" in provinces like Guangdong.
There's nothing admirable about killing or cleansing the men of a group, taking their land, and then taking their women.
This is exactly what han chinks are doing in Xinjiang right now, and this is coming from someone who dislikes Muslims in general, but still, I can empathize with the Turkic people in that region - imagine the government literally subsidizing marriage between a foreign group of men who treat you like shit and your own women.
Fuck Han Chinks. They're the most hypocritical group of men, same as Koreans.
No. 697
>>695>Why so? I'm just saying that Chinese don't care as much as white people about race-mixing, because it's relatively a non-issue for them.Dude, all it took for an entire Chinese university to erupt into violent anti-foreigner riots back in the 1980s were a couple of dozen Africans dating Chinese women.
It's not that they "don't care", it's just that the society is so overwhelmingly East Asia (99.999%) that they virtually never even see it, even in tier 1 cities.
If they had diversity of the scale the Jews foist on us foisted on them, then they'd stage a popular uprising against the government.
No. 700
File: 1482530517437.png (267.49 KB, 1168x400, fembotrightwing.png)
>Liking Asian men is associated with low quality white women (obese k-pop fans, literal roppongi whores, con-sluts etc).>White Women who like Asian men = White Women who like Black men. It's the same shit, and it is driven by exactly the same motivations (self-hatred, xenophilia, lack of any group identity of your own (see: Kanadajin), desperately trying to cling to the group identity of other, more ethnically exclusive groups).>It is indicative of low self-esteem (being cool with being viewed as a racial trophy for men who hate white men but love white women).>Second highest divorce rate of any racial pairing.If you talk glowingly about your white looks, but date an Asian, then you're a hypocrite. Your kids will be chinks and will identify as chinks.
White men do NOT think asian women are better than white women. Far from it. We do not worship them and their culture, and shit on our own people.
Have some pride, you useless weebs!
No. 705
>>702www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/02/chinese-authorties-cash-inter-ethnic-marriages-uighur-minority
Given there are 1.3bn Han and 10 million uighurs and it's mostly Han men who move to xinjiang and they're markedly wealthier, it's obvious what their ultimate intent is.
No. 706
>>703This reads like a troll.
Whites are emasculated but Asians aren't?
No. 708
>>706Different anon, but you're wrong.
Normal and everyday asian men aren't emasculated. That's the image weebs have of Asian guys, which is not real unless said asian guy is very young or a cock sucker.
No. 716
>>710>>711>>712wow look at the
triggered white guy
No. 720
File: 1482626568164.jpg (65.49 KB, 720x418, IMG_20161224_204121.jpg)
>>717Also because asians look like fish/turtles.
No. 732
File: 1482684593898.jpg (67.87 KB, 720x764, IMG_20161225_124808.jpg)
>>731They are not particularly attractive tho, unless you're a weeb.
No. 733
>>731Tbh the only thing that truly makes
>>720 and girl in
>>732 different is the slightly bigger nose. Even their eyes are set apart from each other. They're ugly.
No. 805
File: 1482773325438.png (709.65 KB, 524x741, vietnamese-woman.png)
>>732>>733I honestly think both of them just look plain and boring, like most Asians do.
The truly ugly ones have zero nosebridge and wide nosetips. A good nose and slightly flatter cheekbones is all that Asians need, that's why mixed Asians tend to look better.
No. 814
>>809I agree with
>>717I'm sure there are exceptions. But you're kidding yourself if you think it's common for white women to like Asian men outside of weeb circles.
Also newsflash. If you're here you probably consume or used to consume a lot of Asian pop culture.
People who have racial fetishes always like to imply their fetishes are common among the rest of their race and sex. Hence why the AMWF tag is full of white girls saying things like "white girls really love Asian men!" or why white guys with Asian fetishes will talk about how "white guys prefer asian girls these days".
Reality is most white girls find the Asian male aesthetic unattractive and most white guys prefer white girls.
No. 815
>>678>And btw Asian parents care about it too, but we all know that Asians can actually be pretty damn racistdefinitely true, though i feel like that's more the case with first-gen parents
I've dated two guys who's parents were immigrants and they hated me purely on account of being white
>>703same thing but the opposite reason. I feel like the supposedly "masculine" traits are ugly AF, like a strong brownbone (neandertal brow) or prominent nose or excessive body hair. gross
No. 828
>>826It's /sty/ shitposters are going to shitpost.
I think that a big reason why your Asian bf isn't an asshole probably is because he was raised more westerenized. Asian guys from their homeland are pretty shitty. Good for you, fuck that other anon. They're either a robot mad that he's about to become a wizard or a girl who secretly wants the Asian dick but can't get any.
No. 830
>>828true that.
but being honest, if you like small dicks then go for asians because in general they do have the smallest.
https://www.datalounge.com/thread/12931243-average-penis-size-study-results-confirm-racial-stereotypes No. 831
>>828Lol. You got burned by some Korean or Japanese who had a stereotypical image of you as a slutty white girl unfit for marriage and you're claiming other people are jealous of Asian men?
Spoiler. No white person outside of weeaboos thinks your Asian guy is a catch.
>>829Not the other anon but…
In-group preference exists in spite of how you were socialised or raised. Most Chinese people are attracted to white people, be it Chinese girls to white guys or Chinese guys to white girls. It's not something exclusive to your friend. Even Chinese back in the PRC think white people are better looking.
You just want to believe everyone else shares your preference. Or would share it, were conditions different.
No. 832
>>829>all this "self hatred" comes from when a girl dates outside of her own race.See:
>>816Maybe it isn't self hatred strictly speaking, but it speaks of low self esteem. I don't know any Asian girls who would stick with a white guy whose family openly despised them on account of their race.
If your noodle dicked wonder isn't defending you openly in a situation like that, then one, he's a dick and two, you have absolutely no pride or dignity.
No. 840
>>837The self hate is from the white girls insulting their own men while praising Asian men to high heavens.
I wouldn't make exceptions for male weebs claiming all white women were ugly whores so I'm surely not going to do for these losers.
White people in general need their pride back. And don't give me all that "pol" shit. If you like Asian men you have to know the average Chinese or Korean male holds those sorts of right wing views by default. So they can't be so anathema.
No. 846
>>843>You will never be a living stereotype of a lolcow who is a complete slut for chinky men because of an over-consumption of trashy pop culture from their point of originwew.
feels good man.
No. 847
>>845Not really non? I'm mulatto and in the UK we just call back/white people mixed race. Same with asian and white or whatever else. It's just America who does the one drop rule shit still and god help explaining it to African Americans because even if the kid e.g is like 20 percent black and more white while being mixed like say the grandmother or granddad is biracial. African Americans even if the kid has green/hazel or even blue eyes and looks more white will go "dey black doe!' and yet the kid looks fuck all black.
Again it's the 'well if I'm black then you gotta be black too' which is utter bullshit. Goes to show they have an issue with being black still and feel the need to be defensive? Why? You ask me.
No. 848
>>840Oh god.
Why do white folk get so uppity over Asians finding them attractive anyway? Just curious. Why? Is it the praise or are Asians some kind of special being?
I know Japan is special for pop culture and shit. But why? lol why are Asians these people that whites go out their way for to get 'accepted' by them?
No. 850
>>848White people in this day and age. Outside of eastern Europe and a few other parts, do not have a real sense of identity of their own, so that desire for a group identity becomes sublimated into weirdo subculture groups as a form of ersatz group identity.
Hence all the white female weebs.
If these people were raised with some pride in their own European ethnic background, very few of them would actually exist on the same scale they do today.
It takes a special kind of self loathing to be as bad as someone like kanadajin.
That said. There are plenty of white people who do have a sense of belonging to a group and don't seek out the attention of sleazy gaijin hunting faggots with anime hair. Don't throw us all under the same bus.
No. 861
>>849Well… yeah I guess. But most African Americans are indirectly mixed aka generations before are the mix while actual mixed race people (mulatto ones) are the current direct mix. Again though there is tons of mixed people now anyway but I dont think the ODR will be going any time soon.
Plus I do think even if there was a box stating for 'mixed' in the US it would be abused as fuck by African Americans (indirect mixed blacks not actual biracial/mixed who have parents of TWO different races).
So I guess it would just confuse every fucker in the country. Yanks seem to just think nationality and race is the same shit. Four races on this planet: White, Black, Mongloid (Asian) and that other one in Australia. Unless you are combined by two people from each of those races in my book only THEN are you mixed, currently. Indirect doesn't count. Blood line is washed down.
But oh well.
No. 864
>>862It's not just a fetish though, it's associated with all a childhood and delayed adolescence of consuming huge quantities of trashy asian pop culture, obsessively dreaming about going and living there, gaining PR or citizenship and getting married to someone from there.
Like I said, look at Kanadajin, she hates her own heritage and routinely bashes it. She's not the only one, /snow/ and /pt/ are filled with this type of girl. The evidence, though anecdotal, abounds with girls who are basically carbon copies of each other: Obsession with Japan and/or Korea, desire to move there, naturalize, marry someone from there, obsession with the pop culture, lionization of the men from that race, disparaging attitude towards their own race/culture and people from it, particularly their own men, and so on.
A fetish is what some white fratboy who wants to dress an asian girl up in silk robes and bang her has. This is something else. It's a pathological fixation on a foreign culture because there's a big hole where one's own group identity should be.
Note how well adjusted white (and black) women who didn't spend their teens and twenties watching anime and listening to k-poop actually regard asian men by contrast. As much as the people here with an asian fetish will vociferously deny it and claim an attraction to asian men isn't linked to these traits, the reality is as
>>814 said, it's not common at all for "normal" white girls to like asian men. And it's not just a physical dislike of their features or finding them too feminine (though these are factors), it's a instinctual understanding that cultural differences of the sort that exist between asians and whites are just too broad. You can call them "ignorant" or "xenophobic", but they're closer to the mark on this than most weeb girls are. After all, the halls of famed lolcows are littered with the broken marriages of morons who didn't realize just how insurmountable these often are.
No. 865
File: 1482973897897.jpg (11.22 KB, 640x106, C0mu09ZXAAEHI-j.jpg)
>white women
What went wrong?
No. 867
>>864Ah okay. I see anon.
I do actually find asian men quite attractive to be fair. I did go through a phase to do with anime years ago not anymore and weeb shit. But I do generally find them quite nice. However I wouldn't shout it loud and proud I was dating one if I did. He's just a guy who is asian. Nothing special.
No. 873
>>868I feel like having resentful kids is more common when the genders are switched (Asian mom, white dad) and especially when the dad is only with the mom because he's a weeb and he thinks Asian men aren't good enough for Asian women (because of course the Asian kids would be resentful then).
>won't really be anything like youI can understand people who only want kids that look like them even if I don't share the opinion but in terms of personality it's pretty much up in the air. I'm mixed (not white-looking at all) and I'm very very similar to my white dad, whereas my brother is more similar to my non-white mom in terms of temperament.
No. 874
File: 1482977520708.png (34.07 KB, 869x488, 1438709074950.png)
>>873Clearly you haven't met Flavia, one of /r9k/'s worst female shitposters. Has a Japanese dad and a white Brazilian mother, she hates white people and white men in particular, and idolizes Japanese people. Bitch is also batshit insane, 28 years old, unemployed, can't even cut her own fruit so she screams at her mother to do it for her.
That's just one person, but so are the example you could give to me. We don't really have any actual data on this particular topic, and honestly, I've found the whole "this particular male/female racial pairing is bad, but if the races are reversed then it's good" is usually just sophistic bullshittery I've seen most commonly coming from Asian American men.
Moreover:
>especially when the dad is only with the mom because he's a weeb and he thinks Asian men aren't good enough for Asian women (because of course the Asian kids would be resentful then).I've never encountered a white man with a "love the women, hate the men" attitude for the plain and simple reason that the vast majority of white men greatly prefer their own women and view anything else as a step down.
"Love the women, hate the men" seems to be way more common among non-white guys. Just look at /r/asianmasculinity, /r/aznidentity, /r/asianamerican etc. The most fetishized and desired woman on earth is the white woman, and it's often paired in hand with a hatred of whites as a white derived from real or imagined historical grievance.
No. 876
>>873I go by patrilineal descent. Although race is biological, ingroups also have a socially constructed element on top of that biological understanding of race.
In other words, if your dad is white, you're white. This is common in other cultures too, e.g. Chinese. In fact until recently in South Korea a Korean woman couldn't sponsor a foreign husband for a visa, but a Korean man could sponsor a foreign wife for a visa - That's classic Confucian understanding of identity and descent.
It also has some historical evidence: Chinese expansion into the Asian interior was accompanied by settler colonialism, most commonly in places like Guangdong during the Han Dynasty, where Han Chinese farmers, through low-level ethnic cleansing, forced out the natives and took their women. That's why the maternal line of Cantonese people is very mixed. In spite of that mixed-ness, they still identify as Han Chinese through and through though. That should tell you something.
Patrilineal descent is important because it is the father who impresses his own sense of identity and psychology, nine times out of ten, onto mixed children in a mixed marriage. Especially if it's a non-white man with a white woman, because let's face it, white women are the most liberal creatures on the planet and pretty much think that everyone on earth is exactly the same, barring some minor differences in skin tone. So the average white woman wouldn't object to say, a Chinese or a Korean male raising the children she had born for him as primarily Chinese/Korean culturally.
No. 879
>>671White and East Asian men are both unattractive, hottest guys are usually brown and by brown I mean South Asian or Latino.
Black men are meh, I don't find African american men attractive but I like men from my own culture and Africans/Islanders.
No. 904
>>879>>885Latinos and whites are the most attractive.
I think that, in general, Indians are ugly but the few good looking Indian men out there are drop dead gorgeous. It's hard to find them though.
>>897I'm glad to know someone agrees only americans are obssessed with that. it makes you think. no surprise the country is in a war with themselves. shitty situation.
No. 912
>>671To who? I've been an in interracial relationship for years. I've experienced more problems over a shirt I'm wearing than my relationship.
Stop living in bumfuck ville towns maybe you'd feel better
No. 913
>>904Indian men are disgusting even the 'attractive' ones. They just always have this sense of desperation and affeminacy with them.
As far as race goes I like Latinos and multiracial people the most
No. 938
>>865I think white people are ruining themselves.
>>874Half japs are tricky because weeb culture is so strong many of them try to parade their Japanese heritage at the cost of the other one. Even worse if the dad is the japanese one because they may feel "robbed" of cultural experience and start to overcompensate bc jap dads don't do shit.
No. 964
>>952Ayo gul
Hol up
So u is sayin that you wan sum of dis
grabs BBC No. 989
File: 1483445842295.png (660.49 KB, 885x1314, t3_5l1v2y.png)
No. 994
>>942White men are ugly, gawky, nerdy, and affeminate. I wouldn't want to marry them either
They degrade themselves with their obsession with black men and overall retardation
No. 995
>>915Indians are just disgusting in general. I think they would be disgusting with Brit control. Before i clicked on the video I knew there would be Indian shit worlders projecting their sexual frustrations on this girl
She is white with blue eyes so of course it offends them
No. 998
File: 1483455729643.jpeg (38.68 KB, 640x640, image.jpeg)
Totally
No. 1007
>>1006LOL. Are you insane? Nothing about his face is attractive at all. He looks like a junkie tramp too.
Fuck off troll.
>Asian twink boysAre also disgusting.
No. 1031
white people getting mad at black/nonwhite people for stuff like
>>989 is so amusing. maybe if you actually did something about your retarded women instead of blaming opportunists you wouldn't be complaining about a white genocide lmao
No. 1038
File: 1483554789781.jpg (476.02 KB, 755x1000, 1440004607955.jpg)
No. 1043
>>1040Do you? UN defines multiple forms of genocide, one of which being obliteration through top-down enforced mass demographic shifts. Which is what is happening. What historical precedent does Sweden, the ethnic homeland of ethnic Swedes, have for having hundreds of thousands of Somalians and Afghans and Turks flood into their nation? There is none, obviously. It's an ideological movement lead the leftist authoritarian parties.
You assume "genocide = men in suits shooting bullets" because you're low IQ. But regardless of what we call it, the end result is quite clear. We're talking about the ethnic homelands of whites being irreversibly obliterated.
No. 1048
>>1043>the UNThe same organization that appointed Syria as leaders for peace. Okay.
>Genocide is intentional action to destroy a people in whole or in part. It's not an "intentional action" to destroy white people, you're just a paranoid idiot lmao.
No. 1096
>>1095No, it's not genocide because that simply isn't what the word means.
European colonizers came and made a very specific, deliberate endeavor to kill off those already living on the land and then denigrate them to small reserves. Comparing it to mass immigration in which people merely come to live without the actual intent of "taking over" proves you have no idea what you're talking about.
I know you want so badly to be a victim, but give the delusion a rest.
No. 1097
>>1096>No, it's not genocide because that simply isn't what the word means.Debatable.
>European colonizers came and made a very specific, deliberate endeavor to kill off those already living on the land and then denigrate them to small reservesWrong, especially in the case of the Iberian colonies.
>I know you want so badly to be a victim, but give the delusion a restStop projecting, please. I know you lot are huge into the victim olympics, but I only brought up the european settlers in the New World to highlight your hypocrisy.
No. 1098
>>1097>Debatable.Nope. Anyone who knows what the word "genocide" means and isn't trying to co-opt it for stupid reasons (like stormfags) can testify to that.
>Wrong, especially in the case of the Iberian colonies.I'm pretty sure history disagrees with you on that.
>Stop projecting, please. I know you lot are huge into the victim olympics, but I only brought up the european settlers in the New World to highlight your hypocrisy.Kek. What hypocrisy? I'm not the one trying to force meanings of words to fit my retarded agenda all because me, my family and my friends choose not to breed. You're the one in the victim olympics, you ache for a "white genocide" so you can feel important and justified in your anger. Too bad it's not reality.
No. 1099
>>1098>Nope. Anyone who knows what the word "genocide" means and isn't trying to co-opt it for stupid reasons (like stormfags) can testify to that.Is that why there are dozens of definitions of the word some of which contradict your point?
>I'm pretty sure history disagrees with you on that.It does not. The european settlers just needed land, resources and cheap workforce and never tried to purposely make those ethnic groups disappear or transform drastically. It was just a little side effect. >:^)
>all because me, my family and my friends choose not to breedHaving more people every generation is not a moral obligation my family or friends should have just because the unsastainable consumption ponzi scheme is collapsing. If anything, there are too many people on the planet.
Neither do I see why would one have any moral obligation to let people of other cultures and ethnicities with different natality dynamics into his country.
No. 1101
>>1099>Is that why there are dozens of definitions of the word some of which contradict your point?A cursory glance at Wikipedia says:
>According to R. J. Rummel, genocide has 3 different meanings. The ordinary meaning is murder by government of people due to their national, ethnic, racial, or religious group membership. The legal meaning of genocide refers to the international treaty, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This also includes non-killings that in the end eliminate the group, such as preventing births or forcibly transferring children out of the group to another group. Your hamfisted idea of "white genocide" doesn't even fit in the "softer" definition because white people aren't being prevented from given birth or forcibly transferred outside their countries.
>It does not. The european settlers just needed land, resources and cheap workforce and never tried to purposely make those ethnic groups disappear or transform drastically. It was just a little side effect. >:^)You really don't know what genocide means, holy fuck.
>According to David Maybury-Lewis, imperial and colonial forms of genocide are enacted in two main ways, either through the deliberate clearing of territories of their original inhabitants in order to make them exploitable for purposes of resource extraction or colonial settlements, or through enlisting indigenous peoples as forced laborers in colonial or imperialist projects of resource extraction.So, yes, this is commonly accepted as genocide by people far more qualified than you, I or anyone else in this thread. In stark contrast, "white genocide" does not include any type of "territory clearing" or forced labor toward white people. The more you post, the more apparent it becomes that you have no idea what you're saying.
>Having more people every generation is not a moral obligation my family or friends should have Literally nobody says you're obliged to do shit, just don't call it "genocide" just because other groups have more children. No one is being killed, and there is no genocide being enacted. Your careless usage of that word reflects how insane and insecure your ideology actually is.
>Neither do I see why would one have any moral obligation to let people of other cultures and ethnicities with different natality dynamics into his country.Take that up with your government, who obviously thinks differently. In any case, this is not "genocide" in any way, shape or form as I've demonstrated.
No. 1103
>>1101Sorry but you are completely wrong here, examples of genocides within Europe are numerous. There have plenty of examples of ethnic cleansing either by murder or forced migrancy as well as cultural suppresion even in the 20th century.
Scotland, poland, ukraine, greece, kosovo, bosnia, serbia and that is before you even touch on those caused within mainland europe by the british empire, ussr and nazi germany.
No. 1104
>>1103Forced migrancy does not mean letting people move into your country who just happen to breed faster at this point in time.
Genocide implies intent, you are actively trying to stop that group existing.
White genocide in the context you're using it is not genocide, demographic changes as a result of unrelated legislature (as in not intended to cause damage to that race, not something that happens coincidentally, even if we assume immigration is automatically bad).
You cannot have accidental genocide. You can have accidental extinction, but the groups in charge of allowing immigrants to come into countries aren't intentionally trying to wipe out white people.
No. 1125
>>1104You are just showing how uneducated you are on international issues. In Scotland an order was signed to massacre individuals, thus creating the highland clearences
here is the paperwork
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_Glencoe#/media/File:GlencoeOrder.jpg No. 1143
>>1132Pretty sure stormfags aren't talking about the Massacre of Glencoe in 1692 when they harp about white genocide.
You have literally no reading comprehension skills. Jfc.
No. 1145
>>1108>blackskek
Just say you're not interested in black men. They say you're racist just say you are not attracted to them
No. 1779
>>1101You may not call it genocide if you don't wish to, but the effects of it are identical.
And I don't see how
>or through enlisting indigenous peoples as forced laborers in colonial or imperialist projects of resource extractionqualifies as genocide by that logic of yours either since no intent of erasing a group is present.
No. 1782
>>1779By that same logic the concept of evolution is constant genocide.
If it's not an intentional thing being put in place, it's not genocide. A group gradually becoming a smaller or larger percentage of a population as a result of increased immigration is not genocide, because you're not actually doing anything to the original race. You're not impeding their ability to reproduce or forcing them to leave the region (being evicted from a building or two isn't the same, unless you think highways are genocidal in nature).
No. 1792
>>1779They're not "identical" because they aren't intentional in the least. The "issue" would be prevented if European people simply increased their birth rates, which no one is stopping them from doing or actively attempting to discourage. No one is trying to kill them off. We've been over this. Plugging your ears and going "Lalala I can't hear you" won't help.
>or through enlisting indigenous peoples as forced laborers in colonial or imperialist projects of resource extraction>qualifies as genocide by that logic of yours either since no intent of erasing a group is present.This is when natives of a land are literally forced to actively give their resources to the imperialist group (rather than them just sharing the land, and the imperialist group fending for themselves peacefully with a few hand-outs from the native group out of goodwill). The intent behind forcing the natives to give up their own doubles not only as increased resource gains, but steady "weeding out" of what may be a more populous group of natives due to hunger/lack of resources/etc. This often goes hand-in-hand with deliberate killings.
No. 1795
>>1792>They're not "identical" because they aren't intentional in the least.Their outcomes are: autochtonous population becoming a minority in their own native land. Spare me the mental gymnastics.
>The "issue" would be prevented if European people simply increased their birth ratesFirst of all, this is a non-argument.
Secondly, like I already said, in my opinion people should not be forced to have more children in an overpopulated world like ours just to prevent foreigners from becoming more numerous than themselves in their own countries.
>which no one is stopping them from doing or actively attempting to discourageWrong. Natality propaganda is taboo and decent gibsmedats for families with children are less profitable for the jolly enterpreneurs and the state(at least short term) than importing a bunch of foreigners of whom half will work for food while the other is content subsisting on neetbux with an awful standard of living.
Besides, you really can't expect a population of working females to have as numerous offspring as a population of non-emancipated females.
>No one is trying to kill them offNo, there simply are circumstances enabling them to become minorities in their homelands. I don't see how this is any different.
>The intent behind forcing the natives to give up their own doubles not only as increased resource gains, but steady "weeding out" of what may be a more populous group of natives due to hunger/lack of resources/etcLiterally making the motivations up.
Nobody benefits from amerindians dying in encomiendas for example. The sole motivation is cheap and fast resource extraction. Thus I still disagree with it qualifying as genocide according to your logic.
(According to my personal opinion I indeed consider imposing another culture on the natives and interbreeding with them to the point of nearly erasing the original ethnicities genocide, without doubt)
No. 1802
>>1792You realise there are ways in which mass immigration makes family formation more difficult for natives. Eg demand side pressure on housing prices.
And you could say the same about tibetans and uighurs. Why don't they just have more children than Han?
No. 1803
>>1791Actual mass immigration for economic purposes is a new thing.
>which is something that's been done for centuries95pc of the world's population were subsistence farmers prior to the industrial revolution. You're fucking dumb as shit nigger.
No. 1806
>>1795>Their outcomes are: autochtonous population becoming a minority in their own native land. Spare me the mental gymnastics.Definitions of words are now mental gymnastics. Got it lmao.
>this is a non-argument.No, it's the truth. The possibility (which is, again, a mere possibility) of white people becoming a minority in their own countries could be curbed if birth rates increased. This is not being actively, intentionally prevented or discouraged, therefore, genocide is not in place.
>people should not be forced to have more children in an overpopulated world like ours just to prevent foreigners from becoming more numerous than themselves in their own countries.Like I said, no one is forcing anything. Just stop framing such a simple concept as something else that's much more insidious. It's a scare tactic, and a transparent one, at that.
>Wrong. Natality propaganda is taboo and decent gibsmedats for families with children are less profitable for the jolly enterpreneurs and the state(at least short term) than importing a bunch of foreigners of whom half will work for food while the other is content subsisting on neetbux with an awful standard of living.Now who's making motivation up? No one discourages having children just because it's not as glamorized as it was in the past. Upper-class/upper middle class families wouldn't even need to make much use of welfare/"gibsmedats".
>Besides, you really can't expect a population of working females to have as numerous offspring as a population of non-emancipated females.Not every female in the western world works, fucking kek.
>No, there simply are circumstances enabling them to become minorities in their homelands. I don't see how this is any different.That's not genocide. It's not even close. That's the difference. Words have meanings.
>Literally making the motivations up.Nice grasp. The logic there is very obvious and plain to see unless you're trying to willfully ignore it (which is clear).
>Nobody benefits from amerindians dying in encomiendas for example.That's just one example, and wasn't the cause in every case.
>The sole motivation is cheap and fast resource extraction.If that was the case, it would never be classified as genocide. You're pretending not to see that simple fact because it's inconvenient.
No. 1807
>>1801Do you also think that murder and dying are the same thing?
The same as murder requires someone else, or a group of others to intentionally have ended that life, genocide requires an intent to wipe out that ethnic group via whatever method.
If there's not an intentional action, it's not murder, or genocide, and as such, the concept of white genocide isn't real.
That's not to say immigration at the scale we're seeing doesn't cause some issues, it definitely does, but it takes away from your cause when you act like morons trying to redefine words so they fit your agenda.
No. 1811
File: 1483860403544.png (Spoiler Image,2.46 MB, 1321x900, 1483117691.chuchianci_playful_…)
>why is interracial dating taboo
Because dating a different species might mean she'll kill and eat you instead of sexy times
No. 1812
>>1809The Chinese government encourage the mass immigration of Han migrants to areas with high levels of non Chinese ethnic identity and separatism eg xinjiang and Tibet.
They use it as a demographic weapon just like the soviet union did.
This is fact.
No. 1817
>>1813That is not in any way proof of an intentional action of a current government.
Do you claim that the current German administration hate Jews and other ethnic groups because of a past administration as well?
You need to demonstrate that the action was done with the intent of reducing the white population. If it was done for another reason and then due to white people simply choosing to have kids with other races, or those other races having more kids than white people were, that is not genocide in the slightest.
No. 1850
File: 1483951224047.jpg (22.89 KB, 364x404, badass.jpg)
>>1848…more.
>Self-segregation within the city is widespread, in terms of residential concentration, employment relationships, and a social norm of endogamyhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_to_XinjiangSo where's the racemixing?
>Uighurs have fewer children than they used to, but since 2010 the birth rate has been rising again. In mainly Uighur Kashgar, a prefecture which borders on Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia, it is four times the national average.
>Hans, who feel targeted by rising separatist militancy among Uighurs, worry that they may become outnumbered. So the government is relaxing residency restrictions to attract more Han immigrants. Since 2012 all Hans in southern Xinjiang—a hotbed of separatism—have been allowed to have two children. The government is also trying to curb Uighur births.
>Last year Xinjiang’s party chief said it was necessary to lower fertility and implement a family planning policy “equal for all ethnic groups”, as part of efforts to fight terrorism. Early this year another senior official said southern Xinjiang had “worryingly high birth rates”. This year, southern Xinjiang doubled payouts to Uighur couples who have fewer than their quota to 6,000 yuan ($950). Each parent also receives 1,800 yuan a year for life.>http://www.economist.com/news/china/21678007-government-xinjiang-trying-limit-muslim-births-remote-control
>Manchu, Daur, Tartar, Tajik, Xibo, Uzbeks, Russians, Kirgiz, Hui, Mongols, Kazakhs, Han, and Uyghur make up the ethniciites in Xinjiang, the Uyghur population has grown along with the Kazakh, there were 1.3 million Kazakhs and 8.4 million Uyghurs in 2001, an increase from 900,000 Kazakhs and 6 million Uyghurs in 1982, which was an increase from 500,000 Kazakhs and 4 million Uyghurs in the 1960s. There has been a declining death rate for child birth and diseases have been checked by advanced medical care, helping Xinjiang's population growth, and China does not strictly apply birth control to the area.So the only encouragement of han immigration by xinjiang by the govt were due to fears of a soviet invasion and xingiang's han pop.'s fear of being targeted in terrorist attacks. But can you even call relaxation of immigration policies 'encouragement'? The CCP does't even punish the uighurs who have more than two children, in fact they're rewarded for simply following the law – much nicer than how they treat the hans. Is this what one would call racial genocide? Then I want to be racially genocided.
>>1849Nice to see you not trying to refute what I posted at all. Are you ever gonna give citations, or are you just going to keep spouting conjecture and speculations?
No. 1852
>>1850>Nice to see you not trying to refute what I posted at all. Are you ever gonna give citations, or are you just going to keep spouting conjecture and speculations?Citations for what? There are 1.3 billion Han and about 20 million Uighurs and 3 million Tibetans. The end result is obvious.
Go shill elsewhere, half-chinese girl.
No. 2099
>>671is it really taboo in the real world though?
I pretty much only see people talking about it online. Or is it just that people won't voice those opinions in real life?
Also I feel like it's pretty much only taboo between white/black. I've been dating an asian guy for a very, very long time and only had like one comment on it, it's pretty common to see white/asian couples where I'm from as well, and white/hispanic couples so most people don't seem to notice those things
No. 2185
>>989I was curious and she's actually real and pregnant. She complains a little about how 'no man is gonna take her for a ride no mo' and retweeting single moms and I'm fairly sure she's only like, idk…21? 22? And works retail. The life she's going to provide that kid is probably mediocre at best until she can find some other dude to take care of her.
She's got this weird fetish of black culture going on and says nigga and a bunch of other shit but she's whiter than white and that leaves me with a weird taste in my mouth. Like, she only got with this uggo black guy because 'aesthetic' and wants a biracial kid because it makes her closer to being 'black' and she can have it as a fashion accessory.
Also, I'm a biracial girl, like, obviously I have nothing against black and white mixtures but my parents love each other and I'm not a result of making a dumb mistake that's going to fuck up someone's life before they're ready and sooooo many of these 'strong independent single moms' and their half-black babies just give off this awful fucking stereotype that I kinda hate.
I just kinda…yeah. It's annoying to me. Having a biracial kid without their dad isn't some badge of honour for dating a black man but they act like it is.
No. 2194
>>684I don't like posting about this anywhere on the internet, but that poster is less wrong than you'd think. Birthrates in most European countries are significantly lower than America's, a little above 1. Meanwhile, Muslims tend to reproduce far more rapidly (Pakis in Britain have practical birth rates of almost nine because they have a lot of kids, and those kids marry other kids from Pakistan). Before long much of Europe will see a substantial demographic shift with a lot of negative side effects, and, realistically speaking, the minute orthodox Muslims became a significant political contingent many progressives would flee the country.
More generally, intelligent people are getting bred out in Westernized countries. Wealth and IQ are both negatively associated with reproduction, and the IQ score goes down about a point a generation (the Flynn effect was nutritional and has tapered off). Smart young women tend to go to college, pursue careers, and value independence, while dumber ones have kids before they're twenty. Also, being poor provides some financial incentive for having kids, while the opposite is true for wealthier families.
The point at which this may not matter is machines killing everybody or biological experimentation. Otherwise democracies will degrade into tribes of literal retards.
No. 2242
>>866>>989Das some good schadenfreude.
And "bred"? That's disgusting. I thought only bug-chasing queers use the terminology.
No. 3687
File: 1494893911165.gif (66.48 KB, 680x227, weeaboo.gif)
ITT:
25% actual discussion
25% /pol/shit which I can only assume is from butt hurt white males
25% >ME WEEABOO >U WEEABOO
25% HURR NIGGERS!
No. 3768
File: 1495497723364.png (166.19 KB, 1242x1201, IMG_1033.PNG)
I use to be a black girl who only wanted a white or Asian guy then I realized how ugly most of them are and that the only reason I wanted to date them is because other people said I couldn't then I realized how much more cute black guys are(especially the mixed ones with big curly hair)
No. 3776
>>2099Eh? Not really. Im from the UK and half black/white people and mix is the most common here. Usually though the dad is black and the mum is white. Im mixed too with that combo and parents so… never really had an issue? In the UK its more a religion rather than race like the US.
>>2185Thats pretty sick and pathetic. But to be honest I have known girls here in the UK to do that too "I want a mixed race baby because its cute!" or "yay hip hop aesthetic!" which is sad.
Also don't Japanese do the same? Like always wanting half white babies because they think they'll have these designer half white-high end bridge noses- with blue eyes and light hair? When really most end up looking asian anyway. You get the odd one that has light hair but its not that common.
I actually used to date a Japanese man. Im a bit younger in my mid twenties and he was in his mid thirties. He wanted children - I don't yet. But due to me being mixed and looking back I reckon it was his only intention to date me. He kept saying "So would our baby have blue eyes or green eyes?" and my eyes are a lightish brown and his obviously are black/brown. I was trying to explain how genetics work but I think he magically thought because I have white in me we would have kind of magical child. I got rid of him though thankfully because I felt as if he was dating me solely because I was mixed. It was weird.
No. 3777
>>2194Ive noticed this too here in the UK. There is a lot of Pakistanis and they're the most common Asian here really apart from the Chinese who just… who are just the most antisocial people ever.
Its annoying. I dont find Pakistani/Indian ect attractive at all and they're the most desperate to find love. But no one wants them.
No. 3823
File: 1495933841822.jpg (305.27 KB, 755x800, 1460478711842.jpg)
Black cocks are best cocks.