File: 1486142883876.jpg (39.83 KB, 480x479, ideal husbando.jpg)
No. 2469
>>2324Why would 8 need to change?
I assume 1 means you have an attractive face, and 8 means you have a good body.
You can be tall, overweight and ugly, you can be short and super in shape with a great face, you can be tall with a good body but just not a great face, or whatever. Seems fine to me.
No. 2515
File: 1488611355510.png (136.11 KB, 428x510, lolx.png)
>all these lying skanks ITT pretending they don't want 1+6 or 1+7
No. 2522
>>2519>If he's SMART then he can turn become wealthy eventually,Is that how you measure intelligence? By how much money someone makes, or will make?
Plenty of people below middle class are highly intelligent, and plenty of wealthy people aren't smart, like Forest Gump who was a literal retard.
No. 2524
>>2515lol
>men who ignore women's actual opinions because they don't line up with /r9k/ logicI can't see a reason why anybody would lie here, but I guess whatever makes you feel better about tfw no gf
No. 3491
>>22582, 3, 5
why the fuck is faithful so expensive
No. 3685
File: 1494892327111.gif (993.32 KB, 236x224, Jags_guy gif.gif)
>>2515>>2258I don't get the point of this thread since women rarely compromise in real life anyways (they don't have to0>
Also, trade-off of the question is subjective.
Easy to see in this thread since the items not picked are assumed to be average or above average anyways.
Didn't pick tall? She's probably thinking her guy will be 5'10-6'0 aka "no tall"
Didn't pick romantic? Probably cause all they are assuming a certain level of romanticism set by their standards.
No. 3698
>>22585, 2, and 9. I just want to be treated more like a princess.
I've been the breadwinner in every single relationship i've been in so i've never had that whole "Surprise we're going on a date!" experience and i've only been bought roses once. I'm not materialistic or i wouldn't have married my husband but it does make me a little sad he doesn't really do spontaneous romantic things.