File: 1470669498084.jpg (104.61 KB, 460x609, malefem1_3062978c.jpg)
No. 1859
File: 1470670673366.jpg (473.87 KB, 400x292, 2vEeIAt.jpg)
This thread is going to be a shitshow.
No. 1865
File: 1470673187080.jpg (533.93 KB, 1280x1920, 9eOUn4D.jpg)
Finally, something both robots and farmers can mutually hate together.
No. 1866
File: 1470673348642.jpg (91.97 KB, 643x960, KKhpkDr.jpg)
No. 1868
File: 1470673655450.jpg (93.1 KB, 600x801, OaGP5vM.jpg)
>>106942
There's plenty more where that came from.
No. 1869
File: 1470673711449.jpg (262.34 KB, 900x659, male_feminist_fail_by_neetsfag…)
>be me, 14 y/o tumblrina
>early days of tumblr femininzm
>guy friend asks me if i want to write superhero comic with him
>create an aggressively feminist character
>male friend tells me it would drive the fanboys away
>lecture him for half an hour on muh misogyny until he lets me make a character to fight the patriarchy
>be 4 years later
>realised my past mistakes, matured a bit, left tumblr behind
>male friend is now aggressive feminist ally
>messages me daily on facebook about something that relates to feminism
>"thank u for saving my misogynistic ass anon-chan"
>second-hand embarrassed about my younger self and all of tumblrina sjw shit
>haven't seen this guy irl for 2 years but he still talks to me about his feminist agenda regularly
>mfw i created a monster
No. 1870
File: 1470674000140.jpg (28.99 KB, 600x322, AUyQc3F.jpg)
No. 1871
File: 1470674063573.png (73.35 KB, 500x278, blegggh.png)
Does this count?
No. 1879
File: 1470685199407.png (12.55 KB, 560x194, tumblr_nb2r1tRjRT1ql10y6o8_128…)
How bout these bitches
1/2
No. 1880
File: 1470685246708.png (570.85 KB, 870x783, J5Qi58s.png)
2/2
What's funny is he always gets attacked by feminists for not doing things the way they think he should lol
No. 1881
File: 1470688514769.png (479.9 KB, 595x598, Screen Shot 2016-08-06 at 09.0…)
>>106964
that is so gross, and to think buffy is the greatest show in the universe ever made
No. 1883
File: 1470695809889.jpg (49.33 KB, 880x650, the archetype.jpg)
>>106960
>Male masquerading as feminist for an agenda
I definitely had one of these in my life, I'll try to keep it short but tw I guess
>Be stupidly guilt tripped into staying with gentle sappy puppydog boy
>"I'm a feminist", but guilt trips me into covering up, into promising I'll never move etc
>Surprise! he's actually a rapist because he "can't control his feelings of love uwu"
>Get a clue and leave that shit behind
>Find out he's a sXe vegan sjw now that writes tumblr rants about white cis guys even though he is one
>He also has a sjw band that sings about queer rights and stuff, gets asspats for being such a great ally
>Hear rumours he's done stuff to other girls but I'll never know for certain
His whole music scene is male dominated and really macho, they scream about beating up fascists. The hypocrisy is real. I try not to lose sleep thinking about it but the way he gets to roll in sjw praise without disclosing his past is disgusting.
There are so many well adjusted guys that don't try to use respecting fellow humans for brownie points, but if I see "I'm a feminist!!!" on a profile or said in the first ten minutes of meeting a guy I just think of Parker from Buffy and assume it's a ploy to get laid faster. Which is a really depressing way to react to something that should be good.
No. 1884
File: 1470697118762.jpg (33.84 KB, 600x446, ChTOtH_U0AAQdSP.jpg)
finally a thread for these dickwads. I hate what feminism is these days, and there's nothing worse than dudes using it for their own brownie points. I think the biggest offender for this shit is Matthew McGorry, who's entire shtick as a ~~le male feminist for my ladies gurrrrl power :-D~~ is insufferable.
No. 1885
File: 1470697415293.png (49.18 KB, 500x290, cuckking.png)
>>106979
slight image dump incoming.
No. 1886
File: 1470697452566.jpg (379.62 KB, 760x445, cuckking2.jpg)
>>106981
No. 1889
File: 1470700519605.jpeg (21.27 KB, 300x300, rape1.jpeg)
I want sharia law tbh fam 100(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)
No. 1895
File: 1470759309187.png (86.58 KB, 575x554, 7VPAm1M.png)
Reposting from the bad art thread:
http://thewebcomicsreview.tumblr.com/post/147419524450/hes-a-shot-of-dresden-codakwhere-a-robot-noticesAaron Diaz draws a webcomic called Dresden Kodak in which his marysue is constantly drawn in suggestive poses and getting her clothes ripped off, or just hanging around in her underwear. At the same time he bitches at other creators being sexist for doing the exact same thing he does.
No. 1896
File: 1470759471865.jpg (137.29 KB, 376x750, tumblr_n4oh8rZVV81rphc69o1_500…)
>>107029
As an additional bonus, thank god we have all these straight white males speaking for women! By god we sure need all that male ally power!
No. 1911
>>107448
>men who might not have otherwise had many chances to get laid, can get laid (theoretically)
While I'm sure that there is some change in this area, I don't think it's anything significant. Pre-third wave feminism, the western world wasn't exactly all that conservative to begin with, and all women generally gravitating to the top 20-30% of men isn't just a meme. With that, the people that see the biggest effect of more people becoming slutty would already be the ones that were getting laid, and those are not the same men that become male feminists
>now beta males can become the male feminist and maybe have the chance that their rainbowhair quirkygirl will have sex with him because he's understanding and she's sex positive.
I really don't think that that actually happens. The male fantasy, yes, but I don't think it translates to reality.
>sex positivity doesn't mean the guy has to get fucked with a strap on
My point was simply that some guys have fetishes they're ashamed of and hope that feminism will clear the stigma, I don't know if this is any larger group of people, I've just encountered some examples.
No. 1912
>>107456
I'm saying that there doesn't need to be any real evidence that this is actually the result and benefit to becoming a male feminist. Guys who would already get laid regardless set the example for less able men to find different ways and 'gimmicks' to employ in an effort to get laid.
There are men who call themselves feminists, and there are male feminists. Potential nu males see men who call themselves feminists and see an increase in female attraction to that man. They correlate that because he is a feminist that led to getting laid more (disregarding any of the other factors that makes this man attractive to women). Plus, labeling yourself as a feminist and writing a few social media posts is probably one of the easiest of these 'gimmicks' for these softer, less (hyper)masculine kinds of men. No faux aggression a la PUA courtship, you don't even need a fancy car. If she's sex positive, you (potentially) don't have to jump through hoops to fuck her, and don't have to feel like the kind of guy who "pressures" girls into sex or whatever. Male feminists don't seem to stray too far from average intelligence, so I can see how they could believe in what is more or less just a theoretical possibility.
>I really don't think that that actually happens. The male fantasy, yes, but I don't think it translates to reality.
Probably not, but that's what they seem to hope for.
>My point was simply that some guys have fetishes they're ashamed of and hope that feminism will clear the stigma
Ah, okay. But I'd say that doesn't stop at fetishes. Men who don't fit the social standard of manliness could find refuge under feminism. Empowering the woman to take focus off of the man, and hide their own lackings and inadequacies at having failed at being the social standard of manhood.
No. 1913
File: 1471201480280.jpg (346.18 KB, 1280x771, tumblr_no7s9axG731u0r0dgo1_128…)
>>106964
They downright ate him alive for the "sins" he committed in Age of Ultron. I'm not sure if he ever recovered from that.
No. 1915
File: 1472457221012.jpg (61.33 KB, 640x626, 14100541_1850238808529658_4044…)
Nigga can't take a fucking joke(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)
No. 1936
File: 1474579912413.jpg (117.91 KB, 1023x561, ultimatefedora.jpg)
No. 1937
File: 1474591568692.jpg (435.92 KB, 906x1000, 1457243931328.jpg)
>>110654
Holy hell I agree with all of this. Being really plain I love beautiful, glamorous female characters, especially playing them, I can't stand people acting like they speak on our behalf saying 'no, no, trust me, ALL women hate this as well, it's time for it to go.' If they love women so much, why do they want to strip strong female character of their femininity? What's wrong with a female fictional character being beautiful, feminine, sexy, and strong?
No. 1946
File: 1475165031602.jpg (50.14 KB, 750x679, FEMINISM IS FOR EVERYONE GUYS …)
>>110916
feminism -the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes
if it was equality of sexes them men should clearly be able to be them
it's not very equal to think this way~
I'm not even shit posting but you clearly are
pic related is why this era of feminism is shit
it just triggers me
No. 1965
Male Anon here!
Okay let me give a history of my identification as a feminist.
Did sociology in school in 2004. Learned about feminism. Thought it was just another social movement from the 70's.
2006 or so I found an online forum where people posted redpillesque shit before theredpill. Read the arguments. Thought about it. Took the middle ground a lot. Eventually realised that I was being a fuckstick - the people arguing for feminism had better arguments, the people arguing against were arguing that men are innately more loyal, intelligent etc.
Joined the white knight squad and spent a long time tl;dr'ing about social constructs and prime socialisation etc. Got accused of only holding these views to get laid of course. Posting pseudonymously to a 95% male forum, accusation did not make sense.
Gradually this SJW bullshit came about. When people started talking about this stuff IRL I was already on team feminist and sperging about it. Then it started going mainstream and I was confused to be holding a popular opinion for once in my life. Decided the fact that the word 'feminist' triggered people so hard meant it was important that I keep using it. Held onto that shit long past its sell by date.
I felt/feel more strongly about pervasive gender inequality than I have about any other political issue. Possibly because every girl I've met has in some way been fucked up by it.
Then the whole tranny thing started. After you couldn't just be a feminist anymore, you had be an intersectional feminist (I think the intersectional thing is bullshit, feminism to me is the subset of humanism which deals with gender issues and intersectionality is anti-humanist) and had to support the trannies, I was no longer sure.
It's laughable, the equality loving left has decided that men should have the option to be regarded as women, and when they do so are higher in the oppression heirarchy and deserve sympathy and right of first speech. When to me, the entire fucking message was that long hair and lipstick don't make you a woman, and being able to change a tyre doesn't make you a man.
The whole TERF war thing happened, and the feminists I agreed with were the sex-critical radfems, the libfems seeming like confused hypocrites.
Thing is, the radfems don't want me. That's the whole idea - they're doing women shit for, by and about women. That's where feminism is still relevant - women learning they don't have to be what men want them to be. That's not going to happen if they let men be involved. See also: libfems.
Hypocritical of me of to be all 'Yeah women deserve their own spaces. By the way women in a women's space, I'm a man and here are my thoughts'? No. I don't post in /g/
For the record, I do hate men. Even more than I hate women, which as a reverse wizard is a lot. I hate myself most of all though. I think Valerie Solanas wrote some shit that makes sense, her book was full of nonsense but some of her evaluations of the male psyche are spot on.
I don't think I'd call myself a feminist anymore. I think 'using your male privilege to be heard when speaking out about women's issues' is weird doublethink.
I support your rights to equality. I think women can be men's equals. But I also think at this point it's their responsibility. Maybe you're an airheaded bimbo because that's what you were taught to be since before you could walk, but the only one who can sit down and work through a maths textbook is you. If I could get bigger stronger people to do shit for me because interacting with me reduced the cognitive dissonance they experience when they try to imagine fucking me, I probably wouldn't have learned to things for myself either. (Not saying all or even most women are like this, but there a lot).
The SJW shit has to die. The libfem shit has to die. Y'all gotta do it for yourselves. Good luck.
No. 1968
>>120293Sorry. I'm a total weirdo which is why I posted. Look I even name dropped Valerie Solanas check her out:
"Pussy. Despising his highly inadequate self, overcome with intense anxiety and a deep, profound loneliness when by his empty self, desperate to attach himself to any female in dim hopes of completing himself, in the mystical belief that by touching gold he'll turn to gold, the male craves the continuous companionship of women. The company of the lowest female is preferable to his own or that of other men, who serve only to remind him of his repulsiveness. But females, unless very young or very sick, must be coerced or bribed into male company. "
" Although the male, being ashamed of what he is and almost of everything he does, insists on privacy and secrecy in all aspects of his life, he has no real regard for privacy. Being empty, not being a complete, separate being, having no self to groove on and needing to be constantly in female company, he sees nothing at all wrong in intruding himself on any woman's thoughts, even a total stranger's, anywhere at any time, but rather feels indignant and insulted when put down for doing so, as well as confused – he can't, for the life of him, understand why anyone would prefer so much as one minute of solitude to the company of any creep around. Wanting to become a woman, he strives to be constantly around females, which is the closest he can get to becoming one, so he created a `society' based upon the family – a male-female could and their kids (the excuse for the family's existence), who live virtually on top of one another, unscrupuluously violating the females' rights, privacy and sanity. "
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/shivers/rants/scum.htmlShe's hyperbolic in her use of language and I don't know how right she is about women but she gets many things right about men.
No. 1972
>>120310
So taking care of your appearance is something both men and women have to do, but the burden put on women is so much greater that it's not a trivial difference. I think this is where eating disorders come from (no shit sherlock).
When I started identifying as a feminist this concept of 'benevolent sexism' was more of a buzzword. Which is pretty much the same thing as what a lot of people think of when they hear feminist these days.
Before Mary Wollstonecraft wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Women, she anonymously published a less famous piece called A Vindication of the Rights of Men. Some of that work concerned gender;
"You may have convinced women that littleness and weakness are the very essence of beauty; and that the Supreme Being, in giving women beauty in the most supereminent degree, seemed to command them, by the powerful voice of Nature, not to cultivate the moral virtues that might chance to excite respect, and interfere with the pleasing sensations they were created to inspire. Thus confining truth, fortitude, and humanity, within the rigid pale of manly morals, they might justly argue, that to be loved, woman's high end and great distinction! they should 'learn to lisp, to totter in their walk, and nick-name God's creatures.' Never, they might repeat after you, was any man, much less a woman, rendered amiable by the force of those exalted qualities, fortitude, justice, wisdom, and truth; and thus forewarned of the sacrifice they must make to those austere, unnatural virtues, they would be authorised to turn all their attention to their persons, systematically neglecting morals to secure beauty."
She wrote that in 1790 and it still seems relevant. Those attitudes are not what they were but they're still part of our society even if women can own property and vote now. She got one bad review, but after it was discovered that she was a woman there was an apology
"It has been observed in an old play, that minds have no sex; and in truth we did not discover this Defender of the Rights of Man to be a Woman. The second edition, however, which often reveals secrets, has attributed this pamphlet to Mrs. Wollstonecraft, and if she assumes the disguise of a man, she must not be surprised that she is not treated with the civility and respect that she would have received in her own person. As the article was written before we saw the second edition, we have presented an acknowledgement of this kind to the necessary alterations. It would not have been sufficient to have corrected merely verbal errors: a Lady should have been addressed with more respect."
Gosh I haven't sperg'd about feminism like this in a while.
No. 1974
File: 1481065757380.gif (350.58 KB, 500x318, tumblr_may0asRPbp1r0bk8io1_500…)
Oh man, those guys.
The few times I was arguing about gender politics on Facebook there was always guys who would jump to "defend (?)" me labeling themselves a feminist allies. Then they would send me friend requests and when we were chatting a bit they would start to hit on me, some of them getting angry because I was always rejecting them.
I always think of them as nice guys in disguise.
No. 1981
File: 1483969409211.png (53.23 KB, 683x374, mangina2.png)
No. 2004
>>1981>>Men should have to pay a deposit at the start of any interaction w/a womanHoly crap imagine if this was reversed! Most women would be even poorer than men because of the combined factors of career choice/negotiated working hours and generally being more talkative on average than most men.
This would be a nightmare for modern feminism, not that the feminist movement ever was a good thing to begin with the suffragists had the right idea being patient with social change and putting forward peaceful protests like MLK and the civil rights movement too bad the suffragettes had to fuck everything up for feminism by committing acts of arson, robbery and assault.
Than of course there's the entire argument to be had if women should had been given the right to protest in the first place what with lacking the responsibilities and obligations of men at the time, many historians argue that because of the war effort of women during the twentieth century women could no longer be denied such rights as they were now societal equals. All movements seem to cherry pick issues related to feminism during the early decades which I think is fucking sickening.
No. 2005
File: 1484118192630.jpg (398 KB, 1800x1274, mangina.jpg)
No. 2336
>>1974>>1975A lot of self proclaimed "allies of Feminism" (especially during the whole GG debacle) have been charged with sexual misconduct and rape recently.
Turns out they were just guys that thought Feminism could get them a pussy pass
No. 2377
>>2336>self proclaimed feminists turn out to be abusiveI can't talk about this irl because I'm scared people will then assume I have a vendetta against literally every "feminist" man, but most irl examples of rape or abuse in me or my friends lives was done by guys who called themselves feminists or asexual
It's not that surprising really if someone introduced themselves immediately as a "non murderer" you wouldn't go on to trust them not to kill you.
No. 3767
>>1865its depressing because this guy could actually be reasonably attractive if he didn't go out of his way to look like such a faggot.
Seriously nail polish on a man !? ugh
No. 3789
>>3779*if I were
Stupid fucking whore