/ot/ - Children in Lolita

Name
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment	(F7`Sm0:$3z!CIMY[T -/+#G?1v
File	(20 MB max) Imgur:
Video	96039
Password	(For post deletion)qIh~0KS!Wa{\|i4kDL=

File: 1454202681690.png (332.79 KB, 598x333, Screenshot 2016-01-30 19.09.30…)

Children in Lolita Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 01:11:21 AM No. 65283

I hate seeing shit like this.

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 01:49:03 AM No. 65284

>>>/b/

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 02:30:05 AM No. 65287

Less creepy than adults in lolita tbh

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 02:55:26 AM No. 65293

This photo isn't especially cute, but I've seen adorable pics of girls wearing lolita on /cgl/.

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 07:40:58 AM No. 65330

if the kid wants to wear it, ok, but most of the time it's women dressing their kids to take pictures and whore them out online which is shitty

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 09:44:58 AM No. 65334

>>65330
>children
>not wanting to wear lolita

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 09:48:29 AM No. 65335

>>65334
As a kid I hated wearing girly shit. What are you implying?

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 10:12:46 AM No. 65340

kids will most likely see it as dress-up and fun, in most pics i've seen the kids look like they're enjoying themselves

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 10:13:05 AM No. 65341

>>65335
Just that more likely than not a girl will want to wear frilly shit. Not all, of course.

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 10:17:59 PM No. 65407

>>65287
this.

30 year old women wearing lolita is creepy and weird.

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 11:37:12 PM No. 65419

lolita is essentially for adults me personally i don't like adults wearing prints with pacifiers and toys on them and shit. angelic pretty even says their concept is to look like a little girl lmfao but little girls wearing it just makes it that much more annoying

Anonymous 02/01/16 (Mon) 10:42:02 PM No. 65521

its way cuter than man faced weebs in Lolita.

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 02:15:52 AM No. 65541

>>65283
it's kinda made for them though? I mean lolita was a pedo thing

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 11:49:07 AM No. 65598

It looks better than the adult weebs tbh

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 12:11:56 PM No. 65603

>>65541
stop

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 03:15:25 AM No. 66242

>>65603
but it's true????

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 03:32:39 AM No. 66248

>>66242
http://fyeahlolita.blogspot.com/2013/11/why-is-lolita-called-lolita-does-lolita.html

I already figure you won't read this, so here's a sort of "in summation" comment.

> I do not think that the name of the fashion has any real bearing on the actual aesthetic of the fashion, and certainly not the sort of activities members of the Lolita community are up to. To assume that just because the Lolita fashion and Nabokov's Lolita have a common ancestor, several decades back, that all Lolitas are Nabokov devotees in the most deviant of ways, is to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how words work, as well as how the average interacts with both literature and fashion.

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 03:47:25 AM No. 66256

>>66248
watching lolitas get triggered like this is always amusing

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 04:05:41 AM No. 66260

>>66256
Nice try; I'm not even a lolita. I just take issue with posts like >>65541 wherein the poster makes a lazy and shitty correlation like this. Lolita fashion was not "made for children," and the book Lolita was not just about pedo/hebephelia.

I'm just pointing out an example source which argues the same point, but better than I could.

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 04:17:52 AM No. 66267

>>66260
I can't believe you actually thought the greentext was a good argument lol

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 04:28:10 AM No. 66274

Its cute on kids, looks autistic on adults, end of

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 04:55:10 AM No. 66285

>>66274
Agreed.

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 06:35:03 AM No. 66300

>>66285
I'm slightly new to lolcow so I don't understand, why are there so many threads about cows in the lolita community/lolita shit in general? I don't care about some ugly 20-something autists bitching about other ugly 20-something autists over whose shitty frilly ~kawaii~ cosplay looks better.

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 07:15:04 AM No. 66310

>>65541
>>66242
>>66256
>>66267
The fashion is based on Victorian dolls and has nothing to do with the book (even the time period is wrong lmao). It's only called "Lolita" because Mana, a really popular fashion icon at the time, referred to it that way and it stuck. You could basically compare it to fucking steampunk or gothic wear, but more expensive and with a lot of substyles (Angelic Pretty looks very "little girl" because it's basically childish fairy tale stuff, Moi-Meme-Moitie is gothic as fuck and doesn't look even slightly childish, etc).
Sorry you got BTFO for not knowing what you're talking about, but anon said nothing wrong.

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 02:13:15 PM No. 66364

>>66300
cgl

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 08:39:06 PM No. 66416

File: 1454704746413.jpg (52.6 KB, 416x244, 1453702138741.jpg)

>>66310

Anonymous 02/11/16 (Thu) 06:23:32 AM No. 68941

>>66416
wow a reaction image
you sure showed me

Anonymous 06/26/16 (Sun) 12:37:04 AM No. 99381

>>65293
>>65334