File: 1451757864202.jpg (130.58 KB, 1280x780, d.jpg)
No. 55644
>>55626At this point I see all these as trolling and nothing else.
Like, they know they will get a reaction so I'd rather just laugh along with them.
I mean that statement is just so ridiculous, how could you take it seriously and get mad at it?
No. 55700
File: 1451771716655.png (127.79 KB, 465x256, 8gthbjnk4.png)
No. 55717
>>55691>>55716Woman are not any better in that aspect.
Also society double standards don't help too much about it.
As a lesbian I assure you, many of the woman I have dated have been actually cheating on their gf's with me or later cheated on me.
No. 55766
>>55764Don't try to reasonate with them dear, it's useless.
Oh how I hate political lesbians.
No. 55768
>>55690men cheat more
The Ashley Madison hack revealed that most of the users were male.
http://www.businessinsider.com/ashley-madison-almost-no-women-2015-8Also
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-18233843>The 2006 American General Social Survey found that nearly twice as many married men as women admitted to having had sexual relations with someone other than their spouse. No. 55774
File: 1451796901424.png (17.15 KB, 461x129, 0eff050e257896d263104808e76f9f…)
I truly believe most men would fuck kids if they knew they could get away with it. They would happily rape women, as well.
No. 55785
>>55774>>55776I would have sex with a girl who was 15 and biologically matured. I don't mean just when they have their period. Don't tell me you've never seen a young woman and later discovered they were like 16 and then you're utterly shocked.
I understand the law and making the age limit 18 and that makes sense to me. But I don't understand why people think it is so morally reprehensible to be attracted to a girl who has all the assets a little earlier than others.
No. 55787
>>55785It isn't wrong, but it is wrong to act on it or make her feel sexualized for something beyond her control.
And while a 15 year old isn't pre pubescent, she is still going through puberty and not an adult yet biologically even if she can reproduce. So she isn't mature mentally or physically yet.
No. 55789
>>55768>ashley madison hackAshley Madison also frequently advertise on porn sites, so no surprise there
>nearly twice as many married men as women admitted to having had sexual relations>admittedCome on, anon
No. 55791
>>55788I understand that the law is there to protect young and impressionable girls from dangerous shit.
I know that in my case, if I chose to do it, I would not manipulate them or intentionally do them any mental/physical harm.
I am obviously not above the law and also not at all willing to go to prison so I wouldn't do it. But if I knew there was 100% certainty that I wouldn't get caught I don't see the harm in having sex with her, I had sex with a girl when I was 15 and she was 15 then and she seems totally fine to me, what's the difference if she has sex with me now that I'm 22?
No. 55801
>>55774I can't even remember how young I was when I first noticed men checking me out. 13? I was being hit on before high school. And I'm not one of those girls who look mature for their age either.
My sister's 13 now and I'm always worrying about her now that kids have Snapchat and all this shit.
No. 55809
>>55773(Thanks for the great read anon!)
https://np.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/3249ff/women_of_reddit_when_did_you_first_notice_that/This is an interesting read too, have any of you had any experiences like this?
No. 55813
>>55810What's your point? /r9k/, TRP, and the "manosphere" are retarded and awful. Most people who are aware of them mock them mercilessly.
Just because they say stupid shit doesn't somehow mean it's sensible to say stupid shit that happens to be the inverse of what they're saying.
No. 55832
>>55814You're acting like a 15 year old having sex with an adult is automatically a detrimental experience.
Private parts touch, the end.
Where is the damage?
No. 55836
>>55832It is always emotionally detrimental to a degree because children are raised to respect adults and adhere to their authority and suddenly you have one pursuing you as a sexual item in an attempt to quite literally get inside of your body. It's fucking fucked.
I was pursued by a paedo as a kid who assaulted me repeatedly and who I'm sure would have attempted to rape me had he not been caught molesting a clients baby whilst on a kitchen fitting job and yes it must DEFINITELY fucks you up.
I didn't understand it all why this man who'd previously been a respectable family figure was suddenly doing these things to me.
I felt embarrassed and ashamed because I believed it was surely my fault and that I was leading him astray.
I began showering multiple times a day because I felt continuously dirty but didn't understand why, my mind was too immature to connect the events, and then I developed alopecia from the stress of it all and began losing my hair.
I ended up with massive behavioural problems and issues with authority and would act out in class and scream at teachers and me just getting up and walking out of class was a regular occurrence.
The lasting effects ruined my entire highschool experience and college life, I left with zero certifications from both, even English and Numeracy, and I still have problems with my anger today so don't try to talk shit about subjects you will never understand you degenerate paedo.
No. 55860
>>55836Non-consensual sex fucks everyone up regardless of the age differences involved you tard. "Children" pursue adults of their own volition all the time. Children have sex with each other before the AOC, (which is also different in every country - how can they all simultaneously be right?) and it miraculously doesn't fuck them up.
Your experience, though fucked up, is not what's being discussed. Your massive tl;r post is largely irrelevant except for showcasing how people vehement about this are just fucked up and projecting their own issues onto everyone else.
No. 55898
>>55889>>55894>>55895As a former 16 year old girl, I experienced the complete opposite of this. My friends, classmates, and I all dated people in our age group.
There were rumors about a super creepy teacher who would hit on students all the time though. He was a joke. He wad quite handsome, but he just oozed sleeze. None of the girls liked him. One of my friend's dads was a teacher at the same school, and he warned us to be careful around Mr Creepy. The guy had a horrible reputation because of the endless rumors about him (which I believe, BTW). He had endless access to teen girls, hit on them all the time, showed up to after prom parties (multiple years in a row), make inappropriate jokes, etc, and no one took the bait.
No. 55901
>>55882I don't know what you're trying to say. But if you're trying to suggest that kids having sex is okay, because they were previously molested and just acting out, then…oooh boy.
One child being previously victimized does not justify them victimizing someone else.
No. 55930
>>55924
>and none of them have suffered detrimental effects from itThat's an extremely broad statement.
Nobody in your country, not a single person in the history of existence, no-one has experienced detrimental effects from sleeping with an adult whilst under eighteen?
Care to provide stats for that?
>>55929There's no such thing as an adult having "consensual sex" with a child.
If it's with a child then it's automatically not consensual. End of, paedo.
No. 55934
>>55930Can you not read?
>Everyone I know lost their virginity before they were eighteen>Everyone I knowI don't know everyone in the country you dumbass, nor did I even imply that I do.
No. 55936
>>55932Nice for exposing your shitposting outside of the designated neckbeard thread.
Enjoy your ban, kidfucker.
No. 55941
>>55938See this is the counter-argument and it's misrepresenting what I'm trying to say. I've already said that I understand why the law states that an adult can't have sex with a minor, it makes perfect sense.
I'm not getting worked up. I will live until the end of my days and not have sex with a minor and be fine about it.
But I don't think it's inherently immoral for an adult to have sex with or be attracted to a teenage girl. There's a lot about teenage girls, purely physically, that would obviously draw the attention of a man's eye. If a man manipulates a young woman to have sex with him then I guess it's wrong but what is courtship if not that? When an adult male courts an adult woman he has to convince her to have sex with him. I grew up in a big and sexually active high school and I promise you those girls were not the fragile things you make them out to be, they would happily spurn the advances of an adult male if they didn't want him.
We actually had a case where one PE teacher had to tell the Principal how uncomfortable he was because girls would make pretty blatant attempts at flirting with him. This isn't me saying "TEENAGE GIRLS ARE HORNY AS FUCK" it's obvious in this case they were just being silly and over-stepping the boundaries, but it's pretty clear they were sexually attracted to the teacher and outside of the teacher-student dynamic, if this man was not a care giver/educator/role-model, this man and those teenage girls having sex would have been 100% consensual and I do not think it would have scarred or damaged them.
No. 55945
>>55943that got cut off, but fuckit anyway.
Just because a child can't control themselves, they still have a child brain. What you're advocating is to just take advantage of that fact.
There is no need for adult males to get involved in these relationships at all. Just because you seen an advantage doesn't mean you have to take it.
Leave it for the teens to work out with each other.
No. 55957
>>55955Exactly. Like dude sounds like a grooming pedo.
You're saying that you're basically trying to convince a 16 year old to have sex with you, that's grooming.
Anyway, I'm not here to try and convince some basement dwelling cuck about my perspective as a female. It's a waste of time to try and convince someone who is unwilling to listen to the rule and not the exception.
No. 55959
>>55955Could you BE any thicker? That's what this whole argument is about.
Molestation and sex consensual sex between adults and teens is not the same thing and the repercussions are vastly different.
Of course this is beyond you but try to exercise a little thought okay lassy?
No. 55969
>>55966Because not everyone over 18 who has sex with someone under 18 is dangerous or has malicious intentions.
I support the law but don't consider it 100% a part of my moral code.
No. 55970
Can we listen to this anon
>>55880 and ignore this sick fuck? Pretty tired of reading your shit in this thread.
No. 55980
>>55977Because the 14/15 year olds are still dumb enough to fall for their shit. For many men, it's the only chance they have at getting laid. Plus, they love to fantasize about breaking hymens.
By the time a woman turns 18 she's already usually wise to how manipulative men are, given that at that point, she's likely already endured 5+ years of men trying to trick her into sleeping with them.
No. 55982
>>55958East Asian Studies major here.
The national age of consent in Japan is 13 according to the penal code, but each prefecture retains its own individual age of consent, which is 16 in every single one barring Tokyo where it is 17 and prosecutable for an adult to attempt relations.
In not one prefecture is 13 years of age the legal age of consent.
Eat a dick kidfucker.
No. 55985
>>55974This lel, but apparently the same logic doesn't apply to their dicks i.e. that they would become long and thin following repeated masturbation, despite the fact that the muscular walls of the vagina are considerably more powerful then the penis.
The penis can actually technically be fractured, but the vaginal walls are capable of clamping down so hard that they forbid the passage of even a matchstick.
And they say we're the weak ones lel
No. 55986
>>55982Okay, so Japan's age of consent isn't the lowest and the Nordic countries actually have the lowest out of developed countries
and are some of the happiest countries in the world. Your post made my argument better. Thanks.
No. 55989
>>55984Why do we even keep a containment thread if not to isolate bullshit posts like this then.
Men have never been disallowed from posting but they WERE disbarred from repeated postings of this nature in OUR threads on OUR board.
Men just can't let us have anything to ourselves, they have to come and stick their ugly fucking faces and mangled genitalia into all our shit and then claim that it's women that ruin everything.
This is a very bad desicion and I oppose it wholly.
Hellweek 2.0. when.
I bet this fucking Farmhand is a man.
No. 55994
>>55978Except you're wrong.
I said that men develop sexually at an earlier age, however it is true that women do develop physically at a faster rate.
Sexuality=/=physicality.
Just because a girl has breasts or menstruates it does not mean they are mentally prepared for sexual activity.
No. 55996
>>55995I know, Jesus.
I'm disgusted by men and live in fear of them and that results in hate that I can't help but feel, no matter how stupid it may seem to hate an entire gender. Asking my bf his opinion on what "all men" apparently think according to
>>55949His lack of agreement with said cuck is reassuring.
No. 55998
>>55986FUCKING LOL THIS PAEDO IS TRYING TO CLAIM THAT THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE HPI IN NORDIC COUNTRIES IS BECAUSE ADULT MEN ARE ALLOWED TO FUCK KIDS
Just FYI Switzerland is number one and their AoC is 16 between TEENAGERS.
No. 56002
File: 1451874296921.png (86.67 KB, 500x324, tumblr_inline_nm50k0dNfe1t6dmd…)
>>55996I feel the same way about men. I don't hate them but I definitely don't trust them as 99% of them turn out to be shit. The robots in this thread just make a stronger case for hating them outright, plus if you lurk 4chan or any male-dominated communities in general you start to realize that this is really how they all think.
No. 56003
>>55999>If the thread being derailed is such a problem why not ignore shit posters and re-rail the thread?Two things you have to know about /cgl/ posters anon;
1. They will ALWAYS take the opportunity to post about their weight/height/etc statistics if given the opportunity
2. They cannot ignore things they don't like, even if they acknowledge in their posts arguing against them that it's bait purely designed to derail the thread.
No. 56007
File: 1451874531348.png (36.92 KB, 495x577, tumblr_mjpy40WTY21r6r3nto1_500…)
No. 56029
>>56019Reminds me of the first time I experienced being sexualised.
In the village I used to live in in Scotland there was a small river running through it that I and the other local kids would frequently swim in, sometimes even in Autumn.
I was 11 and I had to yet to develop breasts nor did I require a crop top underneath my shirt - entirely flat as a board.
I remember being in the river one day with a bunch of other kids, all boys, and at one moment laughing at how my shirt kept billowing up under the water.
At that 2 of the boys immediately dived under the water in an attempt to "sneak a peak".
These were boys I'd previously considered my friends who I'd wrestle with and with whom I'd build stick huts in the woods with, but in that moment they made me feel something I'd never been made to feel before in my life. I felt dirty.
I guess this is what being objectified means.
No. 56032
>>56029I know that feel, it's not nice. I remember when I was around that age my guy friends teased me and asked me to nod with my mouth open, I was slow and didn't realize they were making fun of me for looking like I was giving a blowjob.
It was obviously a huge joke for them but it fucking sucks to be a young kid and be conscious that you're already being looked at like a piece of meat.
No. 56038
>>56030Can tell you're a man because only a man would be so desperate for sexual attention that they consider being objectified as a sexual item by people who're supposed to be their friends as a positive.
Men truly are pathetic, wretched creatures.
Now back to your cave faggot.
No. 56046
File: 1451884950573.jpeg (100.54 KB, 750x914, image.jpeg)
lol
No. 56064
>>56030You see, anon, when we describe experiences like this, doesn't it lend a bit of proof against the whole "teen girls want the D (particularly from adults) all the time; age of consent is bullshit"???
These mouthy robots like to be all "hurrdurr it sucks that you felt gross when guys made sexual comments to you. Get over it. That's life ", so they can clearly read and understand that women are describing shit they don't like, but at the same time they'll be like "age of consent is completely arbitrary! What's so traumatic? Penis goes in vagina. Simple logic says that isn't bad."
Like…maybe it IS a bad thing when teenagers and children are sexualized? You clearly read how it made anons feel anxious and insecure. Former/current teenage girls are explaining to you how sexualization made them feel like shit. Perhaps age of consent laws are also there in part to protect the mental well-being of minors? If sexual teasing as a child can create feeling of anxiety and shame, imagine how a child could feel after they were groomed for sex.
No. 56153
>>56150I doubt it is as simple as you just being 'ugly.' You probably don't recognize that beyond just being physically unattractive, the most unattractive thing about you is your revolting personality. Women will absolutely date ugly, but kind and good men. Men that don't feel entitled to sex and relationships because they listened to a girl complain about her ex. Or bought her a gift. These men don't believe in 'the friend zone'.
But the assumption that because a man is ugly he must automatically be good is ridiculous. Ugly men are just as likely to be misogynistic wastes of space like your dear 'Chads' and I'd argue MORE LIKELY to be this way because 99% of men seem to feel some extreme entitlement to women, and Chads can just use their charm to achieve this end, while ugly men cannot. It breeds resentment.
No. 56160
File: 1451939420091.jpg (92.13 KB, 350x350, ugly-guy-hot-wife_brave2_7468.…)
>>56159>implying this trope isn't reinforced from old fairy tales to modern day pop culture>what is beauty and the beast>what is the majority of dom comsWhy isn't the reverse as prevalent? Hm?
No. 56192
>>55892What? I'm not even saying that as a bad thing against women. It's just a fact that women are generally the gatekeepers to sex and decide who gets it. Men don't and some try to seek women out online
This isn't misogynistic in the slightest
No. 56195
File: 1451949371174.jpg (8.38 KB, 170x250, 1362555883553.jpg)
>>56153>Women will absolutely date ugly, but kind and good menNot to say some won't, but being ugly definitely puts you at a huge disadvantage in terms of dating women. Probably disqualifies you from 9/10 potential partners
Not to say being an unattractive female is a walk in the park either
No. 56198
>>56195Looks are completely subjective though.
And they only go so far. I would never date a guy just because he is hot. His personality, interests, passions, humor, strengths, and weaknesses play a way bigger role for me. Compatibility is more important for a relationship, in my eyes.
No. 56200
>>56198>Looks are completely subjective though. To some extent, but there are definitely universally attractive features for both genders. For men a strong jawline, height, facial symmetry, etc. These attractive features often are what cause you to notice the other person and then begin talking to them which is how you know whether you're compatible or not in the first place. So yes, I would still saying being unattractive is a pretty huge disadvantage.
Bit of a tangent, but I don't understand a lot of the butthurt from robots here because the "Stacy" girls are shallow bitches just as their male "Chad" counterparts. Why any robot would want anything to do with someone who only values looks and has a shitty personality is beyond me. The screencaps I see being used to justify misogyny (and misandry in this thread) are the high school douchebags you wanted to avoid and shouldn't base any sort of stereotype off of them.
Reading this thread for many robots hopefully gives them a mirror to realize how stupid their versions of these threads are
No. 56203
>>56202Where are you even getting this from? What's so hard to understand that women generally decide who has sex, and don't need to go sign up for some bullshit site to get laid?
Of course I wouldn't fuck any woman if she came up and asked me
No. 56205
>>56200Of course there are conventionally attractive features in any population. But you know it is an extreme exaggeration to say that women won't truly love ugly men, and will just settle for them for "resources".
Individual differences exist. Someone you find ugly, I could find totally hot.
No. 56210
File: 1451951119130.jpg (3.37 KB, 146x147, 1411084655132.jpg)
>>56209If a woman was to lay in the street naked with her legs open most men would walk by, but she would be guaranteed to have some guy come over and fuck her. This isn't the case for men
Just go on the Craigslist personals section if you want to see another example of this. It's just a bunch of lonely middle aged men begging for women to fuck them. A woman can just turn on her sex appeal at work or wherever else she is and seduce just about any single guy if she wanted to
Hell, I'm single and if any of my other single female coworkers (with a few exceptions) started flirting with me, or straight up wanted me to have sex with her I would. Now imagine if I just went and started flirting with/asked to have sex with a random female coworker? I'd get slapped across the face
No. 56216
>>56210>equates flirting with outright asking for sexand that's why you get slapped
I'm on the higher end of the rating scale and even if I went straight up to a random stranger like 'wanna bang' then I'd fully expect to be shut down.
the only difference is that men wouldn't hit you for it, I guess?
No. 56218
This leaves me a bit confused? Are men sex crazed animals who want to have sex with everything with a vagina from 10-90 or do they routinely turn women down for sex? Get your misandry memes straight
>>56214Is that all you took from that? Women are generally the gatekeepers to sex. I don't know how you can go about denying this. It's not misogynistic, it's just a fact
>>56215>So why would a female coworker even bother flirting if she just has to ask any man? Can you not see it's possible that she may actually like him? Yes if she likes a coworker she can easily get him. My analogy doesn't rely on a random coworker
>>56216Reread my comment and note the "or" and the "/"
I'm not equating the two.
If you're as attractive as you say you are then you'd probably have a pretty good chance at getting laid just by asking tbh.
>>56217Note how I'm not making any sweeping generalizations and am making sure to say "Most" and "generally"
If you went up and down main street asking guys to fuck then you'd have much better luck than if a similarly attractive man did. Most guys will say no, but there are plenty who would say yes
No. 56219
>>56210Well, if you outright as a coworker for sex, of course you would get in trouble, because that is extremely inappropriate in the workplace. Looking for sex at work isn't a good idea for anyone.
The fact that you even said that men would walk by the woman in your hypothetical shows that they can choose who they have sex with. Are you saying you are so desperate that you would fuck the woman in your hypothetical? What about a toothless granny?
No. 56220
File: 1451951970710.gif (9.78 MB, 320x240, 1417315795854.gif)
>>56210> if any of my other single female coworkers started flirting with me>or straight up wanted me to have sex with her Flirting =/= asking to have sex.
No. 56221
>>56219Yes most men would walk by, but there are also many who would not which can't be the same for women. I can't say even the sluttiest of women would pick up a gay laying naked in the street
>>56220You literally quoted me saying "or"
No. 56231
>>56221>I can't even walk outside at night and past a man without fearing that I'm going to get penetrated and my brains bashed in. This. Men are scary. I know this doesn't relate to the topic of casual sex, but walking home at night is terrifying. I had to walk home recently and go down a long road with only a couple light posts. There was a man walking down the same street and I crossed it before we could pass each other. He ended up stopping, turned his head and started cussing me out, calling me a cunt and said other things I couldn't understand. I was terrified that he was going to run across the street. I don't know if I offended him by crossing before we could be in arms reach with one another or what, but it's a scary situation being alone on the road with a stranger and having him yell at you.
Before robots rush in with
>wehweh women are dangerous too! Yes, but the chances of a woman doing this to a man are significantly lower than a man doing it to a woman.
No. 56232
>>56231I does and doesn't relate. i ended up making out with someone at a bar. Next thing I know, I'm being lead down a corridor where I couldn't tell which was the entry door (like those trap doors I guess?). Thank god my friend opened it and found me at the point where I was like hell no and dude was trying to grab my titties.
My only one night stand was supposed to be with my current bf. He was actually shocked that I decided to go home with a stranger, warned me about being murdered and shit. Even men know how disgusting their gender is.
No. 56235
>>56231If you can't trust a man as you pass by him, how can you trust a man that's "courting" you as the robots say?
You definitely offended him. I had a gangster looking dude say hi to me at a bus stop, I said hi. He then told me that I was nice and not like those other stuck up bitches that don't say anything. All I could think was "no shit!!! Stand in my shoes and you wouldn't even make a peep near a man." I didn't say shit and he ended up sitting next to me on the bus, rapping his shit to me. I was so scared he'd follow me off, luckily he didn't.
No. 56238
I'm beginning to know how femanons feel arguing in the women hate threads on /r9k/
>>56222Delusional
>>56224…
This ties into the whole argument I'm making
>>56225I don't see it, but I was saying if they were flirting OR if they were just being blunt and asking for sex.
>>56226Not arguing against this but
>I can't even walk outside at night and past a man without fearing that I'm going to get penetrated and my brains bashed inThis is a bit much. How do live your life being paranoid and afraid of 50% of the population?
>>56231I'll admit this is something I'll never be able to comprehend as a man. I live in a shitty area and went out for a walk at 2am last night and didn't worry about anything. Granted I had a knife on me, but I may as well have left it home. I felt fine
>>56235A female friend of mine was walking through a park and had some gangster thug looking black guy go up to her and say she had a big ass and showed a picture of his dick to her on the phone and said he'd pay her $20 to suck him off behind this one building. Anyways she just said no of course not, and he kept following her raising the price and she started crying and ended up running into a store and told the owners not to let him in.
She dresses very conservatively so I was surprised this happened to her of all people. She practically dresses like a Sunday school teacher.
Really woke me up to this since I thought street harassment was a meme tbh. It seems to be mostly blacks at least.
No. 56240
>>56238Is
>>56222 really delusional if you yourself lamented that you'd be slapped if you asked a woman for sex, but women can flirt with their coworkers? Like…flirting doesn't mean you want to fuck someone, and a lot of guys take basic politeness as an invitation. Ask any barista, I guarantee they will have at least one story about a guy who got creepy after taking her on-the-job politeness too seriously.
No. 56245
>>56238>I'll admit this is something I'll never be able to comprehend as a man. >I felt fineOf course you felt fine. Is it really that difficult to comprehend why women are afraid of walking alone at night? Think about being a woman and having a stranger who is - most likely - large in stature and stronger than you are come up to you or talk to you at night. You don't know if he's going to assault you, shoot you, or what. Even if you have a knife, he can overpower you and take it from you. If you have pepper spray, it can just blow back in your face or not even phase him. If you use force, he'll more than likely get even more angry and more aggressive.
You don't know if you're unlucky and the prey of a dangerous guy that night. It's scary and not all that uncommon.
No. 56246
>>56243I bet that's probably why many of these same guys will get all "but why doesn't she want to date me? I was so NICE!"
Like, "nice" is the baseline.
No. 56248
>>56240>Ask any barista, I guarantee they will have at least one story about a guy who got creepy after taking her on-the-job politeness too seriously.Well that also has alcohol involved to be fair. But yes, many men (myself included), have a problem with that. Not going to lie about that. I get attached really easily because I'm lonely
>>56239See video. You are more likely to get harassed if you wear revealing clothing. Not saying it's right or they deserve it, but it's the truth
>>56244Sorry to hear but
>I think it's completely rational to be afraid of men.Is a bit much. I think it's fair to be wary of anyone if you're all alone and much smaller than the other person and you're alone.
No. 56251
>>56247See the video
>>56248Really watch any of these videos and it seems to hold true
>>56249>even though I'm whining about not being able to randomly ask women for sex.When was I whining? I was just explaining social norms
>>56250Welp. Nevermind then my mistake
No. 56256
>>56252I feel like there's a good story in this
Mind sharing?
No. 56260
>>56258Much less likely to be fair
Also watch the video and notice the different in treatment
No. 56266
File: 1451955751944.png (5.49 KB, 387x429, 1451029742104.png)
>>56265I think Arab and Persian women can be quite pretty
No. 56268
>>56248>>56258Expanding on this: The idea that rape/sexual harassment is some 'uncontrollable' 'urge' that men have is discarded when you consider how often it is used to threaten women. Women are regularly threatened with sexual assault/rape when they do things men don't agree with. I'm sure the majority of women in this thread have had a man send her a rape threat online. Rape and sexual assault are control tactics.
>>56260Do you have proof of this? Show me stats proving your statement. And before you try, do you seriously think middle eastern women, in a culture where honor killings are still a very real thing, and where very very very recently they tried to pass a law that rape victims should marry their rapists, actually reliably report these incidents?
No. 56270
>>56263Just because you're afraid of something, doesn't mean it's likely to happen though. It's sensible to be afraid of being assaulted and take precautions against it, but the vast, vast majority of sexual assaults and rapes are premeditated and done by someone who personally knows the victim. Which in a way, is much more terrifying.
>>56264The best defence is running away, regardless of your sex. The first thing you ever learn in any self defence class is to run away at the fist opportunity. Men do not do this on the whole, they try and fight, and they often lose. The fact you think you "Have a chance" is what's going to get you stabbed.
Even aside that, just statistically speaking, the more encounters you have the more likely you are to not walk away from one.
No. 56271
>>56248I've seen this before, but how is left ~revealing~? She's wearing pants, a t-shirt that covers any cleavage and a small cardigan. Sorry, I don't know what they're called. It's not like she waltzed down the street in a skirt and revealing shirt. Is dressing to fit your frame considered "revealing" now?
Also, sorry but most people in the west don't want a muslim woman like that.
No. 56281
File: 1451956468257.png (2.04 MB, 1200x1358, 1451929926958.png)
Wish we could all just get along, why does it have to be like this ;_;
No. 56285
>>56281Because waaaah women are all bitches and whores who want chad. what's wrong with rape??? it's just sex. it's natural.
This is what men ACTUALLY believe.
No. 56290
>>56284I was eating and I'm not a robot
>>56268>Women are regularly threatened with sexual assault/rape when they do things men don't agree withWut. Can you please provide a real world example of this?
>I'm sure the majority of women in this thread have had a man send her a rape threat online. Rape and sexual assault are control tactics. I'm a guy and I've received dozens of replies and messages threatening to rape, dismember, and kill me. This means nothing
>>56270With that comment I wasn't saying I'm safer because I'd try to go Rambo on some guy, but mostly that I'm less of an easy target because of my size compared to that of a woman
>>56271To be fair she's not showing much skin, but she is wearing clothes that really hug her curves
>>56272Memes
>>56279Do you think as seen as a girl turns 18 she's somehow more emotionally mature and stable than she was the previous day?
>>56281>>56282I like to think I've been pretty polite
>>56286>>56287Good posts
No. 56293
File: 1451957365806.jpg (296.09 KB, 1334x694, 1434227729644-1.jpg)
>>56291Obligatory meme post
No. 56297
>>56290Robot, you literally followed your statement about how you want a real world example of men sending rape threats with an example of how you yourself have received rape threats.
Are you always so oblivious?
No. 56298
>>56290And I'm sure it's other guys that are threatening you with rape.
Wtf.
No. 56300
>>56296I can't imagine an actual case of this
>"Debby, go get my bookbag or I'm going to rape you">Samantha, work overtime or I'm going to violate you">>56294>>56295She's a curvy lady and was wearing clothes that complimented that. I'm not saying she is asking to be harassed or anything. She was dressing to impress and she impressed quite a few people evidently
>>56297?
>>56298Yes? I'm just pointing out that I wouldn't count many threats online as legitimate harassment
No. 56301
File: 1451957677996.jpeg (33.2 KB, 320x320, image.jpeg)
>>56290imo, a 17 y/o and an 18/19 year old having sex? fine, since they're about the same maturity level (high school, just out of high school) but if a guy who was in his sophmore year of college, where he already started somewhat maturing and being exposed to the "real world" tried to fuck some girl who was still a teenager, that's fucked up and wrong, since that girl is still easily manipulated due to her not maturing yet
the 17/18 thing when it comes to AoC is arbitrary, yes, but there's a clear limit. you cant just put a 16 and a 20 together at all
and why do penisposters even use the 17:18 argument in these types of discussion anyways?
No. 56303
>>56301>you cant just put a 16 and a 20 together at allI wouldn't want a 16 year old partner, but this is biologically pretty fucking natural and was more than the norm less than a century ago. Hell my grandma was 14 and married my 19 year old grandpa and they were fine
>>56302Can you expand on that?
No. 56305
>>56290No, nothing in
>>56272 is a meme. If men can't help themselves when it comes to their natural sexual urges, then why aren't they also controlled by their other biological urges?
No. 56306
>>56300Has to be a troll.
>Dressed to impress>White shirt, cardigan, leggings and sneakersAKA typical 'going to the grocery store to get tampons' kinda outfit.
You are unabashedly ignorant and it's no wonder women in real life are repulsed by you.
No. 56309
>>56256honestly that's just me venting, I've been on /mu/ for quite some time and I've hated the way they can just treat women like items to be gained and lost
all they do is obsess over female artists and hop onto the next one when the old one isnt trendy anymore, post about how "oh i broke up with my gf, music for dis feel?" like we even fucking care, post about what their wacky/silly things their girlfriends do in an attempt to feel intellectually superior and generally act like "nice" guys like they arent the exact same as the "chad" they hate
its full of fucking robots i tell you what
No. 56312
>>56305>If men can't help themselves when it comes to their natural sexual urgesWho is actually implying this? I hear this argument more from feminists than anyone else
>>56306>>56307>>56310I was baiting a bit there I'll admit tbh
She is pretty beautiful though
My going to the grocery store wear is sweatpants and hoodie
>>56308So do you think AoC should be raised or something? I don't disagree with your post
No. 56315
>>56290
>Wut. Can you please provide a real world example of this? If you're a woman in this thread that has ever personally been threatened with rape via a male in their lifetime please respond to this post with "me" or something to that effect.
I'll start. Me.
No. 56317
>>56309Music dudes are some of the fucking worst. They're like the vidya gamurrz who try and make you prove your music/nerd cred by asking you offensive questions. I had an asshat see my purse with a band logo on it, and actually asked me "can you even list any of the songs in that album" like fuck you, do you do that to men you see? No? Fuck you with a pike. I don't have to prove shit to you because believe it or not I don't value your opinion just because you have a meatstick.
End rant.
No. 56322
>>56315Me.
Also, can I add this for robot anon to read:
https://www.instagram.com/perv_magnet/Is an Instagram put together by a violinist of all the revolting messages she has received over 10 years. I don't see any women sending her threatening/creepy messages….
Also, I'll add this for robot anon:
http://fatuglyorslutty.com/Where women gamers submit messages they have received from males.
No. 56325
>>56313>"Do you want to go out with me">"No, maybe another time">"I'm going to rape the fuck out of you Anna"I just don't see it
>>56314>If this is all the work of the same anon, then he admitted that he gets attached to women in the service industry Was talking about women in general. I don't get out much so any interaction is nice
>is upset by the fact that he can't just ask his coworkers for sexI hope you are aware of how you're misinterpreting my analogy there. I was simply explaining social norms that men would have much less success asking a coworker for sex
>I bet he's the kind of guy who thinks he's the star of his own movie: any interaction with a woman is a potential romance plot.Memes
>>56315I'm a guy and so have I. Can you provide a real world example of these threats? Not online shitposts
>>56309Kpop general is pretty great
>>56319I was just saying dressing very conservatively will cause you to get less attention
No. 56327
>>56303>a century agoexactly
times have changed, women are less submissive then they were in the last century, and women are now expected to take care/control of themselves and other people at around age 18-20 rather than 14-16. that's why 16 and pregnant exists, because the idea of a woman being able to have those sort of consequences happen to her at such a young age is shocking, unlike in the 1800's or the 20's
also men used to get away with a lot more shit than they get to now without being shamed/criticised by other people or society (cheating on their spouses, domestic abuse for some examples)
No. 56331
File: 1451958539386.png (236.79 KB, 1048x750, 1449918079299.png)
>>56329I feel like this image is relevant to a lot of this discussion
No. 56332
>>56312Follow the comments and replies further up and you'll see that the topic came up after you posted that video. It came up after you started insisting that revealing clothing makes it more likely to be sexually harassed. As if men couldn't help but harass a woman in "revealing" clothing (or a fucking T-shirt, apparently). As if, if it weren't for the clothing (or T-shirt), tempting men's sexual urges, women wouldn't get harassed.
So what I'm asking is, if you are also so controlled by your other biological urges, with the right cues (ex: see T-shirt, cat call woman; feel a tingle, and piss yourself)
No. 56333
>>56325>kpop general is pretty greatopinion immediately discarded
you are genuinely continuing to make mu a worse place, even with your shitty containment thread
go back to objectifying celebrities from foreign countries and jacking it to hi res pics of ming-jyun park whatever in shorts you freak
No. 56338
>>56332The mental Olympics men do for this argument must be exhausting.
>Women gets rapedDON'T WEAR TIGHT CLOTHES YOU WHORE asking for it etc etc etc
>do you shit yourself because you can't hold it?IT'S NOT ABOUT URGES IM NOT AN ANIMAL
which is it?
No. 56339
File: 1451958794581.jpg (1.84 KB, 125x89, 1444224413466s.jpg)
>>56335First off I'm not a robot
I'm 21 turning 22 in July
You're all invited to my party btw
>>56337This is a misandry thread and the robot thread was put on autosage so eh. Just felt like I'd try to convince you all that hating 50% of the population because internet memes is pretty dumb
No. 56344
>>56337This robot in particular seems to be excessively lonely and may just be enjoying socializing with women outside his own gene pool for the first time since he dropped out of high school.
>>56339You want to convince us that hating men is dumb? Go convince robots that hating women is dumb first. go on. we'll wait.
No. 56345
>>56337idk but according to our worthless farmhands robot shitposting outside of the containment that is now A-okay.
And men like to complain that it's women that invade their sekrit penis-camps.
No. 56346
>>56325>I was just saying dressing very conservatively will cause you to get less attentionNo, you weren't. You said
>You are more likely to get harassed if you wear revealing clothing.She's not wearing anything revealing.
No. 56349
>>56343>You want to convince us that hating men is dumb? Go convince robots that hating women is dumb first. go on. we'll wait.I've tried this plenty of times and it's just as fruitless as here. It really is like looking into a mirror and I hope you all realize that
>This robot in particular seems to be excessively lonely and may just be enjoying socializing with women outside his own gene pool for the first time since he dropped out of high school. I didn't drop out of high school first off. I also just enjoy any sort of conversation
>>56346Certainly more revealing than a burqa was my point.
No. 56350
>>56342Then you live under a rock
>A man was acquitted of rape today after a jury agreed his victim could not have been sexually assaulted while wearing skinny jeans.Nicholas Gonzales, 23, told a court in Australia that sex with the 24-year-old woman was consensual, despite her claim he had ripped off her size six skinny jeans before the attack.
The Sydney jury sent a note to the judge during the trial asking for more information about 'how exactly Nick took off her jeans'.
The note from a jury member added: 'I doubt those kind of jeans can be removed without any sort of collaboration.'
The not guilty finding follows two other courts - in Seoul and Italy - dealing with the question of whether a woman wearing the tight-fitting jeans can be raped.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/16/world/ruling-on-tight-jeans-and-rape-sets-off-anger-in-italy.html No. 56351
>>56339What is your experience with women?
I personally base my negative feelings about men on the plethora of negative life experiences that range from strangers, family, and friends.
No. 56357
>>56350>'I doubt those kind of jeans can be removed without any sort of collaboration.'Pretty valid point tbh
>>56351Well first off I don't have negative feelings towards women despite you all trying to paint me that way. I have had zero female friends and have never socialized with any outside of work and being put in groups for school. Men aren't much better for me. I'm pretty autism
>>56354It's a meme post
>>56356Regardless having enough hate in your heart for something like 3.5 billion people on Earth seems kind of draining
No. 56359
>>56351This. I hate men because of real violence they have done to me. Not because they laughed at me when I asked them out for prom or turned me down for a
Chad or because they wouldn't fuck me (opposite, actually) like robots hate women for. They hate women for completely petty reasons, and all because women refused to stroke their delicate egos. Lots of women hate men because they brutalize them and then shift the blame to the brutalized woman instead of their own disgusting self.
No. 56360
File: 1451959278193.jpg (13.93 KB, 255x187, 1443640210686.jpg)
>>56349So women should wear burqas if they don't want to be cat called?
I have a question. Are you a Muslim, robot?
No. 56365
>>56361Really this. They complain about how stupid /r9k/ is about women but they do the exact same here
>>56360I'm pretty nonreligious, but I have Muslim family members
No. 56369
>>56362False rape charges are pretty fucking common
>>56366What types of theories? If anything I give women more the benefit of the doubt. I assume they're pretty nice
No. 56374
>>56366Because he's a male, anon.
>>56369If by 'pretty fucking common' you mean about TWO percent.
http://www.icdv.idaho.gov/conference/handouts/False-Allegations.pdfSo you care more about the 2% of men who get falsely accused than the
98% of women who aren't lying? Human garbage.
No. 56375
File: 1451959676138.gif (1.68 MB, 250x187, Moe-Walks-to-Rejects-Side-The-…)
>ITT:
No. 56377
>>56370Seems most of your fellow posters hate all men
>>56372Most women seem perfectly fine with men. You just seem needlessly upset at a whole group of people for no reason
No. 56378
File: 1451959696342.png (93.55 KB, 592x1884, kek.png)
No. 56380
>>56374>Because he's a male, anon.Good post
>>56379>You just have to believe me anonPass
No. 56382
File: 1451959788817.jpg (26.85 KB, 272x248, 1446225609140.jpg)
>>56378This has to be fake
No one is this gullible
No. 56383
>>56381>The entire post is filled with your theories!No?
I've agreed with you all on many points already. I'm just trying to argue against hating an entire gender
No. 56386
>>56380People have been giving tons of sources in this thread and the robot anon mysteriously ignores them all because they inconvenience his retarded arguments.
How about from now on robot anon supports all HIS completely fabricated-from-his-ass arguments with well researched journal articles. We'll wait.
No. 56389
File: 1451959938530.png (93.05 KB, 500x422, REEEEE.png)
>>56365>doesn't believe women are threatened with rape irl>thinks women hate men because kek memes!>I-I'm not religious b-but my family are MuslimsGET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE, MALE SANDNIGGER REEEEEEEEEE
No. 56391
>>56281Because farmhands are lazy fatasses.
We could've had an actual misandry general but we have a debate thread instead
No. 56393
>>56384I wouldn't do such a thing
>>56385Memes are cool and I've been told I'm cute
>>56386Like what sources?
Someone provided a rape case article from 1999 and a fake rape stat page
>>56387Well I hope you stop being that way
>>56389I'm not Arab
>>56390Noted
>>56392I looked at it
No. 56394
>>56383Being cautious around men isn't hating an entire gender.
And sure. You haven't presented any theories. By the goodness of your heart, you're just trying to keep us femanons from hating "all men".
No. 56396
>>56393i never have been that way, i dont hate men every day of my life, nor am I a NEET
its just funny that you immediately go quiet when someone says that, like youve finally found the "normal, rational" girl in this thread that you'd love to interact with
don't respond to this fuck. he keeps shitposting and adding nothing but fodder to the argument
No. 56399
>>56394>By the goodness of your heart, you're just trying to keep us femanons from hating "all men".Nah I'm just trying to understand this twisted thinking while also laughing at how similar you all are to the robot boogeymen you hate
>>56396I am trying to be nice and polite to everyone itt
No. 56405
>>56402Seems like random occurences that shouldn't be used to hate a whole gender. I've had certain women be shit to me but I don't hate everyone with a vagina
>>56404You're the ones who seem to be needlessly hostile tbh
No. 56411
>>56405Sorry, no.
A girl being shit to you isn't the same as being threatened/raped/sexually assaulted just because you reserve the right to reject a man.
No. 56412
File: 1451960625618.jpg (43.24 KB, 465x360, anonymous-was-a-woman.jpg)
This whole thread is
#NotAllMen
by one lonely sad robot.
I'm just going to ignore the male shitposter now. Let's get back to our misandry.
No. 56416
File: 1451960953574.png (374.42 KB, 341x795, double-standards.png)
No. 56417
>>56406>>56407Random people being shit who happen to be men
>>56408I'm nonreligious but if you look at Mohammed from a historical perspective he was none of those things
>>56410>Men are incapable of empathy for women, stop wasting your timeI really hope you all lurk misogyny threads on /r9k/ and note that you're all being exactly the same
>>56411How so?
>>56412Meme
No. 56422
File: 1451961077940.png (351.08 KB, 720x1280, image.png)
an example of /mu/'s creepy fad obsession with women
posts like this were commonplace for lorde in 2013, now its all about "muh waifu annie clark/lavren/grimes"
No. 56423
>>56420Nice retort
Sure convinced me
No. 56430
We've confirmed that the guy posting in this thread for the past few hours is indeed a robot, despite his denial, and that he posted a thread on /r9k/ to try to get them to raid this thread.
I'm not going to link the /r9k/ thread, and I ask that no one else posts it, either.
Nothing he posted here was ban-worthy in any way, but trying to start a raid is against the rules.
>Do not make any threats or harmful actions towards the website itself, including attempts at "reporting", flooding, raiding, DDoSing, or getting the site shut down. This also includes attempts to get other people to help with those things.
Note that men and robots, even robots who don't identify as robots, are still permitted to post in this thread as long as they don't spam and aren't extremely obnoxious. Just don't call for other people or websites to help you start a brigade or raid.
No. 56431
File: 1451961206699.png (3.19 KB, 327x316, 1450464114880.png)
>>56427>Unlike men I don't go out beating, raping and killing the opposite gender or creating communities advising others to do so.Holy hell I'm laughing
(trying to start a raid) No. 56438
>>56433You did.
Also I accidentally quoted the wrong rule in
>>56430. Refresh to see the correct rule.
No. 56445
File: 1451961515146.png (127.35 KB, 640x1136, image.png)
No. 56446
>>56438I actually didn't
My guess (assuming not false flag) is this
>>56418 No. 56447
File: 1451961589153.jpg (27.46 KB, 540x306, rihanna-bless.jpg)
No. 56449
File: 1451961666522.jpg (51.74 KB, 500x375, andrea-dwokin.jpg)
No. 56450
>>56448Ebun.
I don't like being told I did things that I didn't actually do
No. 56454
File: 1451961757757.jpg (79.25 KB, 1024x1207, question.jpg)
Question for you all.
What is your general gripe with men? Simply put; what brought you to hate men so much?
Did any of you have bad experiences with men? Because it seems to me that whenever a man makes a bad point or says something mean, you blame it not on him but on men in general. ALL MEN.
How is it possible to love someone with this mindset? You seem to be attacking all perceived men in this thread by using personal attacks and telling them they will never get laid, as if you think that only respectful men deserve your respect and love. And I'd agree with this normally, but if all men are, as you say, worthless, then why would YOU want to be with a man in general? If sex is truly the be-all-end-all you make it out to be to attack men, then why do you seem so obstinant to the idea of different sexes?
Correct me if i'm wrong, but I think you are all just using information you've heard to validate your own bitterness. You're no better than those fags over at /r9k/.
No. 56456
File: 1451961796531.png (464.8 KB, 515x515, otakus-rekt.png)
No. 56459
>>56454Or spam you with meme
Great debate tactics
No. 56470
>>56458>>56459>>56457Meme.
Omg, the femanazis don't want robot shit posts, how absurd.
No. 56472
>>56454we tend to put men in plural because the individual men who do this to us tend to pop up in different forms in our lives
if anything robot types are more hung up over their one particular ex and then label all women as cunts
No. 56475
File: 1451962102031.gif (1.12 MB, 480x360, 1.gif)
No. 56477
File: 1451962126377.gif (1.94 MB, 480x360, 2.gif)
No. 56478
File: 1451962138799.gif (1.43 MB, 480x360, 3.gif)
No. 56479
File: 1451962148690.gif (1.58 MB, 480x360, 4.gif)
No. 56480
File: 1451962157759.gif (1.49 MB, 480x360, 5.gif)
No. 56482
File: 1451962165927.gif (1.51 MB, 480x360, 6.gif)
No. 56483
File: 1451962177277.gif (1.63 MB, 480x360, 7.gif)
No. 56484
File: 1451962185272.gif (1.61 MB, 480x360, 8.gif)
No. 56488
File: 1451962331987.gif (16.49 KB, 205x274, Nice_05.gif)
This is a nice board.
Although you guys are garbage when it comes to banter.
No. 56491
>>56474Farmhand a lot of us are getting frustrated over how every time we attempt to have a legitimate discussion it inevitably gets invaded by worthless penis-bearers with their fallacies and echo-fotresses.
You keep stipulating that these posters have yet to have broken any rules, but why do we even have the containment thread if not to discourage posts such as what is occurring in this thread?
I'm getting increasingly frustrated by the increasing male presence on this board and your inaction in relation to it.
Is it that you're also a man and so feel sympathy for him and so deign it that his voice "ought to be heard"? Seriously, what the fuck gives?
No. 56492
File: 1451962494239.jpg (51.36 KB, 640x596, keks.jpg)
No. 56493
File: 1451962562621.gif (2.35 MB, 480x270, robots.gif)
Thanks for the raid, you tendy craving fuck.
>>56492This should be in the tumblr thread.
No. 56497
File: 1451962893001.jpg (84.12 KB, 538x584, rich-women.jpg)
No. 56502
>>56501The lolcows posted here are, shockingly, not works of fiction or falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as false.
BTW does this website allow repetitive content to be posted?
No. 56506
>>56503Can you fucking explain what you mean by that?
I'm new in this website.
No. 56510
File: 1451963710117.png (307.19 KB, 1079x763, never swipe right to a ginger.…)
Watching men fail at flirting is as amusing as watching animals do tricks at the circus.
No. 56514
>>56505This
robot thread personifies entitlement.
I guarantee none of you people have ever been raped, maligned, or truly objectified. A
woman denying you is not "a bitch", fyi.
If you're all truly angry, then why do you act so goddamn smug? You act this way because you have the right to. Because you can, essentially.
No. 56515
>>56514Yeah, read that post again.
I never made any evidence of a woman denying me, not did I call you a "bitch".
It seems the only arguments against me you can make are generalizations based on absolutely nothing I said. I'm sorry you have to live such a lonely, bitter life.
No. 56517
>>56514How do you make italics?
{em}test{/em}
[em]test[/em]
(make better posts) No. 56518
>>56505I always thought it was retarded that women complain about being percieved as sexual objects.
You exist physically, therefore you are an object
You are fully equipped and actively seek sex, therefore you are sexual
You are a sexual object.
No. 56519
File: 1451964081073.jpg (5.75 KB, 264x191, 6a00e553644f9d883401538e487435…)
>womens' response to cyberbullying is attempting to defend themselves by saying "meme"
So their defenses are THIS flimsy, even online. No wonder it's so easy to rape 'em.(thank mr rodger)
No. 56521
>>56518I always thought it was retarded that
men complain about being percieved as
human meat.
You exist physically, therefore you are an object
You are fully equipped and actively seek
war, therefore you are
war fodderYou are
human meat.
No. 56526
>>56524Don't even try.
The people in this thread aren't women. They're whiny internet people. Even if they are, let's not stoop to their level by lumping them into the category of "all women."
Most women are sane people who would agree with us in this thread, I guarantee. The only people who would really agree with these…things that make up the majority are lonely, sad, desperate white boys.
No. 56527
File: 1451964744591.webm (278.28 KB, 854x480, robots.webm)
No. 56535
File: 1451967487616.jpg (62.1 KB, 850x400, y6mj.jpg)
No. 56538
To people sending in reports: many robots in this thread were banned in the last 2 hours. We're not ignoring reports.
But once more, there's no problem with robots posting in this thread just to talk or provide an opposing an view. It's only when 100% of someone's posts are something like:
>>56532>>56519>>56498>>56504that you can't exactly have a real discussion.
No. 56545
>>56543Thanks
Makes sense
No. 56546
File: 1451970019061.jpg (319.85 KB, 750x1334, women1.jpg)
Reading this thread pretty has pretty much proven that the women here spurt around their opinions based on their precious feelings "I was raped when i was 7! this is why uneducated opinion". Its actually pretty funny how ignorant these landwhales are.
Pic related its average female internet poster.
No. 56548
>>56546but she's right
imagine if you were being raped anon. would you call it "sex" afterwords?
No. 56550
>>56549definitively, you're right; but I don't think I'd get raped and say "yea I was unconsentually sexed". I can imagine how someone would want to separate the two, seeing as sex is suppose to be enjoyable whereas rape isn't.
I mean, there are a lot of girls who get "raped" and don't go through any trauma, depending on how bad, or, potentially good, it was; but to the individual I could understand having a need to not consider rape as 'just' unconsentual sex.
No. 56573
>>56540>Why is this thread being singled out?Would you rather the robots shitpost all over site, it's not like this thread contributed to any reasonable discussion anyway.
Who would've thought that crackpots circle-jerking would've attracted other crackpots with a contrary opinion.
I'm honestly just waiting for robotic wives to come out, it's a lot less hassle and everyone wins.
No. 56584
File: 1451974187452.png (115.21 KB, 1476x289, ss (2016-01-05 at 01.09.26).pn…)
No. 56601
>>56600Come on, man. Agreeing with the OP in the screenshot who called a 13 year old rape victim damaged goods?
gr8 b8 tho
No. 56607
>>56491It's because the admins can see that a lot of the posts ITT are normal users shitposting and baiting. I started the first derailment, and from my post history it's pretty fucking obvious to the admin/farmhands that I'm not a robot.
Keep crying that you're being invaded by robots and nothing will happen, because it's normal users taking opportunity of the fact the posters on here cannot ignore bait to have laffs.
No. 56643
>>56315We are having some immigration problems in finland, and racist "all black people are monkeys, white finland 4ever waah waah" men are very concerned about white women and their safety, while wishing rape on any woman who doesn't think black people should all be murdered, or who otherwise disagrees with them. Now they have started a campaign called Soldiers of Odin, and they patrol the streets wanting to protect white women from non-white men, WHILE wishing rape on us on the internet. It is scary as fuck.
One female blogger made a blog post about a big store that has blue toys for boys and pink toys for girls, and she wrote how ridiculous that is. She got multiple death and rape threats. It really isn't that uncommon to receive those from men who don't agree with you. It's scary to be a woman with opinions nowadays.
No. 56646
>>56643>while wishing rape on any woman who doesn't think black people should all be murderedI somehow doubt this is a common notion held by them
And why are you making fun of people who think Finland should remain Finnish and not an African colony?
No. 56650
>>56646She's not making fun of them she's criticising extremists.
>I somehow doubt this is a common notion held by themOh look it's a man. Get the fuck out.
No. 56652
>>56646I never understood this objection. If someone speaks the language and is a good, tax-paying citizen, why does it matter where they're from?
And for those who inevitability aren't good citizens, the issue then is dealing with those specific people. No need to take it out on all Africans as collateral damage.
No. 56664
>>56643>>56660It's funny because these extremist groups are literally acting just as badly as they accuse non-whites of acting.
Not long until they start raping women in order to "demonstrate what those evil muslims and black animals would do to you!!!!!".
No. 56676
>>56643>We are having some immigration problems in finland, and racist "all black people are monkeys, white finland 4ever waah waah" men are very concerned about white women and their safetyAs another anon said, what's wrong with people in Finland wanting their country to remain Finnish? Not just in Finland, but the whole situation with swarms of men coming from the middle east and Africa is a scary one. They're causing trouble and raping the native women. Nothing wrong with being concerned.
>while wishing rape on any woman who doesn't think black people should all be murdered, or who otherwise disagrees with them.I doubt all of them think this way, but I do see where you're coming from. I do see a lot of "gotta protect these women! but if they do like blacks then fuck them". Probably not the best example, but /pol/ does this shit a lot. I've seen threads where men are saying their white women are being raped and then others respond with
>well, she probably likes niggers so she asked for it…>good, they should be raped for wanting them in their country
>Now they have started a campaign called Soldiers of Odin, and they patrol the streets wanting to protect white women from non-white menWhat's wrong with that? Again, a lot of women are getting raped and assaulted by these men. If they're patrolling the streets and see a biracial couple holding hands and attack them for it, then that's a problem. If they're patrolling the streets and see a guy who is clearly bothering her, what's the problem?
No. 56686
>>56676There's nothing wrong with wanting finland to stay finnish, but there is much wrong with people being complete racist morons and doing harm to people based on their skin color. Also, we have a lot of non-white people here who are finnish. Finland will never be full white, and i don't really see a problem with that.
The patrols are fucking scary, and most of the members have been sentenced for violence and theft. I don't trust skin head men who feel the need to play police and frighten innocent people. Even the police is against these patrols. Our population is more afraid of the patrols than the immigrants. Also, most members are part of the group that has vile rape fantasies of leftist women. It's only bad if it's an immigrant who does harm to OUR PRETY BLOND ARYAN WIMMENS! I fucking despise these entitled crazies
No. 56772
>>56757Listen skin colour is NOT the problem. I'm not saying that non-whites aren't the problem but it's usually non-whites who hold retarded savage views but that's due entirely to CULTURE.
I support keeping Finland Finnish and that means rejecting a fuck tonne of refugees but how can you support lynching fellow countrymen who truly believe in the integrity of the nation yet are not white, there's no benefit to that.
No. 56775
>>56772So you dont see a problem with the native Finns being a minority in their own country as long as the nonwhite immigrants dont rape and kill?
No country or people are obligated to try to import the entire third world.
No. 56818
>>56775First, they're not going to be a minority in their own country, no matter how much fear-mongering. If that really starts to happen, and I doubt it, just close the borders when it's on the brink. And if large numbers of them refuse to assimilate to the culture, deal with that issue as it arises. Blocking people from entering a country based on hypotheticals, future long-term fears, or the behavior of some bad apples among them isn't rational.
>"But it's more than just a few bad apples!"Then prove it.
No. 56885
>>56775>native finns being a minority in their own countryWell, sami people are a minority, but I'm pretty sure you don't really care about that. Us other natives are alive and well, thank you very much.
Also, if we close our borders, we will be in a big trouble. We don't want to start being friends with russia, and if we close our borders, that's pretty much our only option, because the west won't deal with us anymore. I, for one, don't want to start hunting bears for a living because of some racist buttfucks only want white men to rape and kill. We have had immigration to finland for some time now, and most of the immigrants have settled down just fine. Some have learned our culture maybe too well, because every couple of years one of them starts waving an axe or a knife around while drunk. Usually it's the native men who do that.
tl;dr men suck, whether they are white or black or brown or whatever, there's no denying that.
No. 56886
>>56643You're a fucking retard for thinking we have actual racist problems. The racists are an extremely small minority and no refugee ever got beaten up by them, but plenty of Finnish women have gotten raped and the street violence has been on a steep rise for months now, all thanks to the refugees flooding in. The "rape-wishers" area couple of mentally insane people who stick to whining on the internet. I'm more afraid of getting raped by a Iraqi than a Finn, and statistics support my fear. All of the sudden rapes by a stranger in a public place are committed by people with an immigrant/refugee background.
>>56660The molotov thing happened only once and it didn't even go off, and the burning down of the refugee shelter was started by a cigarette carelessly discarded BY A REFUGEE HIMSELF. It's not a fucking common notion, stop talking out of your ass.
>>56686>Patrols are scaryI wonder how many people they have beaten up, robbed or raped? Yeah, none. How about the refugees? Yeah, a lot. The patrols are just sad men who do nothing but try to act intimidating.
No. 56890
>>56885I'm sure non-Finnish speaking war refugees will pull this country out of its misery! Of course they're not going to be a burden on the system and will start contributing in just a few years, and the government doesn't have to do stupid trick programs to employ them with wages paid by the tax money. They're just the same as foreign trade or immigrants moving in to work here! etc.
I welcome Asians, Russians, Estonians, other western immigrants etc. since they always actually try to integrate or at least keep their act clean, and they offer great cases of positive immigration experiences that you can use as examples to support immigration. But how the hell can someone in all seriousness claim that the country will go down the drain if we don't let every damn middle-eastern and African refugee in?
And fuck the Sami too, they're one of the most racist bastards who desperately try to claim to be the "native people of Finland" when archaeological findings support the fact that they arrived to Finland after the other finno-ugric tribes who now make up for the majority of the natives. Yet they get special rights to the land in the north, their own parliament, their own media and whatever they could ask for. And they still practice apartheid-like racial politics.
No. 57224
On Monday (January 4), someone posted a thread on /r9k/ with a link to this thread.
An archive of the /r9k/ thread:
https://desustorage.org/r9k/thread/25500023
>There's a girl's only image board filled with femanons who are arguing with me in a male hate thread. It's so easy to bait them
>lolcow ( dot ) farm / b / res/ 55626 ( dot ) htmlStaff incorrectly assumed it was the male poster debating others in the thread (
>>56339 ) who posted the /r9k/ thread, and not just because of the nature of the post. Unfortunately, our assumption was based on invalid information, and we banned him at
>>56430.
After further investigation, we discovered that this person did not make the /r9k/ thread. It was actually a long-time lolcow.farm user, who was very active in this thread, and actively arguing with the male user.
A few (not all) of their posts:
>>56364>>56402>>56403>>56404>>56425>>56432>>56436>>56473>>56493>>56507As a result, a raid from /r9k/ occurred for about 4 hours. A number of robots who otherwise wouldn't have found the site began shitting up this thread and other threads. Some posts were deleted, and 5 of them were permabanned. It created a major hassle for staff. While it's pretty likely that threads like these will be linked on /r9k/, I did not think I'd have to worry about our own users cross-posting threads there. To make matters worse, I also believe the male user really wasn't even a /r9k/ user, though of course, one can never be entirely sure. They were unbanned once I confirmed they did not post the /r9k/ thread.
When I asked the lolcow user why they linked this thread on /r9k/, they said they did it because they thought it would be funny, and they wanted to "stir the pot" and have more people to argue with in here. They said they impersonated the male user in this thread when posting the /r9k/ thread to have a plausible thread OP (i.e. /r9k/ would expect a robot telling his fellow robots about a male hate thread). I do not think they had any malicious motives, and they likely did not intend to get the male poster they were talking to banned (even though that was the result), but it was still very stupid.
I did not permanently ban them, but I banned them for what I feel is an appropriate length.
I ask everyone to please not link lolcow on /r9k/, but
especially not like this. And to the user who was incorrectly banned: I apologize for the mistake.
No. 57262
File: 1452279891273.png (212.48 KB, 599x346, B7rtMsNCQAEcJrN.png)
>>57224ahhaahahhahahaahh this fucking thread
No. 57441
File: 1452352259229.jpg (42.63 KB, 233x233, 1448145346228.jpg)
>>57224false flagging your own thread to feed your victimhood.
Calling them a mirrored image of /r9k/ would be a compliment this is much more pathetic.
No. 57508
File: 1452367233640.gif (494.77 KB, 450x257, 1421521325955.gif)
>>57224I fucking hate our userbase sometimes.
No. 58083
>>57224why do we keep these threads tho.
they have been proved to only generate butthurt and attract robots.
No. 68687
File: 1455141419909.jpg (24.48 KB, 636x382, okcgraph.jpg)
No. 68699
File: 1455143962879.png (56.52 KB, 749x459, crimerates.png)
Absolutely disgusting.
No. 68717
>>56007>>56009>>56010Jesus fucking christ.
Why do so few girls know the truth about the porn industry?
No. 68959
File: 1455186168815.jpg (114.08 KB, 768x1024, me.jpg)
>>55626>>55626WORHTLESS CUNTS :^)
SOON RAPE WILL BE LEGAL
(ok) No. 70916
File: 1455587832839.jpg (333.25 KB, 1028x1513, joke.jpg)
>>68966It's an obvious attempt at a joke you dumbass, albeit not a good one at that either.
The mod is also a dumbass
No. 100725
>>56454It's not all men, it's men as a class, men in a collective sense
Men are socialized to be violent, to be misogynistic, etc
Men's socialization benefits them, so many of them do not with to address this issue
No. 101167
>>56153What the fuck do you consider entitlement to women?
I saying hello to you and not being treated like rapey MCrapo entitlement to you.
No. 101168
>>101159 Sounds like someone's salty that they leer at women and wonder why they get rejected.
Learn to be a man and stop being a whiny faggot.
No. 101169
>>56171Describe to me a non-wanker
Your boyfriend the man you love has been rejected before you by a scores of women. He is a wanker to them, a creep, a loser, and a wimp. How does that make you feel?
No. 175006
File: 1483384967242.jpg (493.32 KB, 3264x2448, 677675.jpg)
>>174929>implying there aren't plenty of women, especially teachers, who prey on middle/high school guysYou sure love to generalize an entire gender, don't you?
No. 175326
>>175006Robot pls. "plenty of" in a population of 3.5 billion hardly means anything.
Pedophilic/hebephilic men though, it's in their biological imperative. But keep pretending it's a generalization.
>>175306If you're 16-18, maybe.
No. 175425
File: 1483546860703.jpg (82.69 KB, 481x648, onlythedeadcanknowpeacefromthi…)
>>56248>revealing clothing
>pants, shirt, sweaterREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FUCK YOU
No. 175426
>>175420i have immediately lost all sympathy for cows seeing how racist you all are
if you don't want men to be sexist how about you don't be racist
No. 175427
File: 1483546940488.jpg (974.05 KB, 2000x2000, 1465836532346.jpg)
Q U A L I T Y T H R E A D
U
A
L
I
T
Y
T
H
R
E
A
D
G O L D E N
O
L
D
E
N
No. 175732
>>175326Women are attracted to hot 16-18 year olds
Wasn't there some 12 year old on the show Shameless they were all getting wet over?
No. 175817
File: 1483685936152.jpg (38.86 KB, 564x550, 1468128330819.jpg)
This thread made me think. I'm a 'virgin'. It's hard to come to a consensus about what virgin really means. Some people say it only counts when you penetrate. Others say oral counts. I say fuck all that shit and be a good friend. Sound beta? I give zero fucks.
The penis is a third actor. When you say 'That guy is thinking with his dick', you're on the right track. That guy is actually doing no thinking. His dick is thinking. If you've met a penis before, you'll know it reacts without input from him. It has a mind of its own.
Throughout a guy's life, he gets erections whenever his dick wants to have an erection. If he avoids having an orgasm long enough, he gets so horny it's distracting. He has no control over it.
He learns to control this behavior via wanking or blowing a load in/on her, turning around, and sleeping. This is a bad idea. He needs to learn how to make love rather than dump his orgasm and leave. This is old news to you women.
Personally, I strive to understand how to make love above everything else. When I have wank sessions, I try to hold in my jizm as long as possible. Currently, my record is 10 minutes, which is the standard according to The Joy of Sex (1972). I want to be able to hold it long enough to outlast my partner.
I'd make a good boyfriend. Welp, the search continues.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)
No. 175819
File: 1483688373144.gif (226.86 KB, 600x600, 729.gif)
>>175817>enjoys being a beta virgin>can only last 10 mins>"you women"This is the most pathetic thing I've ever read and the saddest attempt at "please pay attention to me" ever. Nobody gives a shit, you retard.
No. 175906
File: 1483738714195.png (388.31 KB, 576x1024, 1453730603804.png)
Hello I am a frequent poster at r/incels and r9k. I am 20 years old and single and am looking for a gf
My only qualifications are you don't be fat.
Please feel free to contact me at my email [Email redacted by Admin](pls no bully aol)
Thank you(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)