File: 1730343537142.jpg (107.65 KB, 750x1125, 3504a4c74bfd8f9af4bf1f52369ede…)
No. 2232578
a lot of women purposely put their children in bad situations so they can get ass pats for being a “strong mama bear” and be praised for their resilience/doing the best they can with very little. If a woman does stuff like claim she starves so her kids can eat, that’s a red flag. The struggles they have are usually created on purpose for attention.
No. 2232593
>>2232578what a stupid bitch
>a lot of people ask me why i keep having kids with no space>my answer: don't judge me>people who dun been stay living LIFE don't go judging others!fucking hillbilly cunt oh my god i'm gonna a-log so bad
No. 2232619
File: 1730344342419.png (Spoiler Image,4.91 MB, 1722x2395, image-asset.png)
>>2232595Serious question. Do you think Jesus is walled?
No. 2232620
>>2232606Trannies are usually the ones who shill motherhood, you are two peas in the same pod. Go wipe that snot of your child’s nose instead of talking to strangers on a 4chan ripoff for women kek
>>2232608Go take care of your kids
>>2232614It’s because she isn’t employed so “she” has time to refresh the page and post it before anybody else does kekkkk
No. 2232629
>>2232617Old thread locking thread timestamp: 31/10/24 (Thu) 02:59:16
This thread timestamp: 31/10/24 (Thu) 02:58:57
No. 2232635
>>2232623Stop being a whiteknight for mothers, they don’t want to fuck you
>>2232626There’s an MtF thread here in /snow/ that’s showcases their usual behaviors and fixations, they love fixating on the same motherhood loving garbage that you breeders do. I think a lot of anti-tranny breeders only hate trannies not because they are dangerous to eveey single woman and they destroy our spaces but because they act like mirrors to your self-fetishizing behavior.
No. 2232643
>>2232611They have the bedroom to themselves and the kids sleep in the kitchen/dining room and living room.
No. 2232650
>>2232648This is not an unpopular opinion. Eggnog is delicious,
nonnie.
No. 2232664
>>2232633>faggy stare ugh! unbelievable
nonny…
No. 2232667
>>2232645Because literally everyone in this world came from a woman. There's probably some attachment and respect there for the vast majority of people.
Then there's the totally insignificant fact that most women want children, so you're criticizing their future plans.
No. 2232718
File: 1730346270787.jpg (118.38 KB, 680x615, FwuV-qlWYAEiaiv.jpg)
>>2232703Your entire existence is one of seething at men. Literal slave mentality. KEK you suck at life.
No. 2232719
>>2232636based tbh, you wont get through to tradfags because caring for their children causes documentable brain damage. does anyone remember the halloween bunker where an anon posted a photo of her child? imagine being so brain damaged by raising your own child and babying your nigel that you post your child on a basketweaving forum for nitpicking camwhores thats rife with pedos and cp raids. honorable mention to skelehands who posted a video of her troony boobs lactating, iirc it was after having a meltdown for an entire thread because she couldn't get a post to delete and blamed it on pregnancy hormones. these are the people you're trying to talk sense to kek, its a lot cause
>>2232645theres just more normalfags trying to colonize lc as of late. you usually see a few seething replies when someone makes an anti natalist statement, and any statement that talks about the risk or stupidity of the choice is just relegated to durrr ur a woman hating troon
No. 2232720
>>2232693Ntayart but
>female breeder actively choosing to be shackled to a male, carry his children and perpetuate his progeny and by that ruining her body and personhood>female firefighter doing dangerous tasks and saving the lives of the innocent including the children of retarded mindless breeders who leave their children unattended which is very taxing, hard and painful and thankless with no benefits, no tax breaks, no maternity leave, no people cheering you on for doing what a cow does so people can eat beef because it’s their job Yeah the firefighter gigastacies mogs weak breeder women any day.
No. 2232732
>>2232730based
i'm sick of these freaks thinking they are the norm
No. 2232764
>>2232744Nope, it’s full of very fucked up, weird women and that’s just the way imageboards are tbh, they are mainly used by people whose viewpoints are different from the mainstream. And yes I’ve looked at past threads and posts and honestly they are the same kinds of posts being made today kek, nothing has changed but everything has changed at the same time weirdly enough. I even posted a screenshot from a thread from
7 years ago and the same quality and quirks of the posts was the same being done today. Weird, overly personal, mentally unstable posters, that’s who uses imageboards. That is not an insult to anybody even though
Ive been insulting everybody kek that is objective fact and common sense, I have eyes and a brain and that’s what’s clearly happened and is still happening.
No. 2232773
>>2232578I feel for the daughters because no doubt the closed proximity to older/younger male siblings will result in them being diddled.
CPS should be called. Several children have no business living in a one bedroom apartment. Terrible.
No. 2232794
File: 1730348994825.jpeg (223.76 KB, 867x1390, IMG_4429.jpeg)
>>2232789The average woman looks more like that
>>2232643. Beyoncé would look like an angel up against me and every woman I know irl.
No. 2232826
>>2232810It's not the most favorable situation imo but the commenters are literally claiming their parents abused them or something because they shared a room with 1(!) other sibling. Like I get if it was a crowd but crying bloody murder over a shared room is ridiculous
>But but don't have kids if you can't give them their own rooms!!Kek if you claimed college dorms, co habs, sororities, etc were abusing teens for making them share rooms you'd get laughed at. What changes on your 18th birthday that no longer entitles you to a single room?
No. 2232835
File: 1730351371686.jpg (77.45 KB, 1280x720, 1000000122.jpg)
Scary movie > scream. Scream is only favored for the fake-gay relationship at the end
No. 2232839
>>2232832This was a really shitty way to respond to a very
valid point
No. 2232884
>>2232872men
love crazy, despite what incels say about "damaged goods" or whatever. You can literally make a moid uproot his family and career by being the hot broken girl. the jokes they make about "all the hot girls being crazy" is because they find craziness hot, not that hot girls are crazy
No. 2233058
>>2233041>Not when most of the nonnas there are retarded and delusional.the whole site is filled with retards.
>t’s just women thirsting over 18-25 year olds and their dicksThe thread is mostly shitting on mens look. It peaked me and its the only thread where I feel sane when the rest of lolcow and any other online space shills walled and ugly men.
No. 2233080
>>2233072>Why only that thread bothers you that much?This statement makes two false assumptions. Where in my post does it imply I'm bothered by the thread? If anything my post infers indifference. Why are you also implying that it's only that thread that apparently bothers me when no opinion of other threads was presented?
Stop getting offended and trying to infight over nothing.
No. 2233090
>>2233083>You probably only briefly scrolled through the threadAgain why are you making assumptions? I haven't mentioned if I regularly post in thread or not.
>Hide the thread if you have a problem with it instead of acting like an annoying fag about it.You're the one getting offended and trying to start an infight because I suggested the thread would be better off on /2X/. What about that is offensive?
No. 2233135
>>2233119it doesn't matter if nonna is ugly, even ugly women shouldn't have to settle. scrotes are the ones who kill themselves over not getting laid, they should be the ones making themselves better.
>>2233129where else can we openly talk like this tho? also this is /ot/
No. 2233138
>>2233119kek
nonny where did you get glasses that let you see through the computer screen? I want a pair.
No. 2233143
>>2233137not trying to infight, but what do you mean by policing and moralfagging? not saying it doesn't happen, but can you give me examples of what you mean? most infights that resort "moralfagging and policing" were started by bait over things that are opposed to here for
valid reasons.
No. 2233150
>>2233119Me
>it feels like more like a /2X/ threadYou
>pick me, ugly loser that can't get a scrote>>2233134While this is very true, the same can be said of trannies. Using the site as a platform to encourage newfags does nothing for post quality and gives the mistaken impression that this is a purely feminist website when it isn't and never was.
No. 2233159
>>2233143A lot of them aren't interested in talking about things such as how the patriarchy affects our lives and like
>>2233149 said how misogyny bleds through society, and they would rather blame other individual womens' actions (for being "collaborative" with scrotes) and attack them over actually hating the moids who perpetuate misogyny, because they're still hung up on wanting to look appealing to men and desiring them in their lives. It's too much for them to admit that men actively hate and despise us because they still want to believe the best out of their Nigels or Nigels-to-be. So they attack anons over petty things like having male friends or acquaintances, liking something traditionally masculine, lesbians not interested in men or screech uncontrollably about sex workers (and nitpick their bodies and looks) rather than the Johns and perverts and the structural misogyny keeping the porn industry alive.
No. 2233185
>>2233159AYRT i see your point. I think it's a case of not being able to call out or know how to do anything about those scrotes in power, although the women who enable them don't help, so it's very bleak and lonely when even the women around attack you for calling out men's misogyny and how they perpetuate it, so it becomes a vicious cycle. I've come to realize that women who can go without relationships are very few and most women want to have relationships and be loved and desired which is obviously normal, so it's very crushing to realize that "love" and "romance" isn't real and men actually hate them. There is nothing wrong with hornyposting or thristing about men being hot, but you can't really expect much out out dating them. I myself don't have the answer for this, because i can't really blame women for wanting to be loved, women don't want to be loved because they see men "loving", they do it because they themselves are capable and want to respect, admire, cherish someone in their lives so they go into relationships in hopes of this being reciprocated, only for it to never happen so they either go into this website portraying the behaviours you've said or like the majority end up doing, they cope and buy into choice femininism which is just misogyny repackaged, constantly trying to "fix" their mindset and bodies to endure relationships and society at large. I never wanted to marry and have children, but i feel depressed over the women who work so hard and give so much only for nothing in return, so they end up in a cycle of coping and trying to "play the game" and "improve themselves" only for it to avail to nothing.
No. 2233188
>>2233159I agree strongly with the rest of your post but
>screech uncontrollably about sex workers (and nitpick their bodies and looks) rather than the Johns and perverts and the structural misogyny keeping the porn industry alive.How do you reconcile this with the fact that /snow/ and /pt/ exist?
No. 2233189
>>2233155 >I thought through interactions I've had with men and refused to apply any of the usual mental gymnastics I used to do to excuse their awful behavior in my mindThis. At a time when men (and plenty women sucked in by it) have taken to parroting
> Women don't take accountability > B-but imagine if the roles were reversed and a woman did this awful thing instead! Because that'd totally mean she'd be excused or judged less harshly..When we're the ones who have been or are still being memed into finding any possible excuse for men and their actions. Without even realising it most of the time because it's that intricately weaved into what we've been taught to do. To poor-guy the fuck out of them when that suits them or respect the hell out of them as being so capable when that suits instead. Grown men exist on a pedestal or in a baby crib depending on what would serve them in the moment. Mental health never gets taken more seriously than when a man needs to use it as an excuse for doing something horrendous that's only gone and fucked someone elses life up. Their
victims mental health, met by the sound of crickets. Using up empathy on men while we judge the hell out of other women.. only for men to turn around and add insult to injury by saying "yeah umm askually women are the ones who get excuses made for em"
No. 2233409
File: 1730400515854.jpg (47.52 KB, 736x590, 9046ed34fd693a4ffce97c53667da5…)
I could sound like a schizo but I came to the realization that men can only either be freudian mommyfags (big boob big ass woman that takes care of them while she is simultaneously a slut for them and teaches them how to have sex fetish) or pedophile groomer (into submissive flat/small chested younger woman that is pure and chaste but is secretly a slut for them and lost their purity with them fetish). Yes male sexuality is that simple but nigelfags or normie nonnas will disagree with this I think.
I don't 100% hate moids but they can't seem to like partners who are their age group they always chase neotenous younger women or sexy older women, unlike women who enjoy males their own age range. If you ever spend a couple of hours in 4chan boards you will see posts that are either "loli cunny child" or "big boob sex teacher momcest hag " in all the boards, literally all the boards have this weird theme of "sex with a mother" "sex with a child" shit, from /a/ to /v/ to /r9k/ to /tv/ to /vt/ they are all the same. Why do men have to be so freudian , was Freud right?
No. 2233423
>>2233409I agree with you nonna, but I also think that 4chan isn’t the representative of the male population.
I think the average man is passive, in the sense that he benefits from patriarchy and just enjoys it, while keeping comradeship with other men. Men don’t care about women , the majority of them don’t see us as people evens, capable of having emotions, thousand dreams.
I don’t think they’re capable of love, the love that they feel is just them liking the things you do for them, men are just capable of taking and taking, while still desiring and chasing new sensations, hence why you see men who cheat on their pregnant wives after 10 years of marriage.
These extremes that you talked about are present, but not all in all the majority.
No. 2233437
File: 1730402179274.gif (31.92 KB, 236x297, 584488.gif)
>>2233423>but I also think that 4chan isn’t the representative of the male population.I think it represents many men and it's a place where they reunite themselves to be brutally honest and express their feelings without being shamed since they are all anonymous, just like how lolcow farm is for women.
>the majority of them don’t see us as people evensI have noticed men categorize women into porn categories " asian loves white cock" "ebony loves to get gangbanged by kkk members" "white bbc lover slut" "loli raped by her teacher pedo professor hentai" "teacher raped her son hentai", men are autistic as fuck and will look at you and try to categorize you in what porn fetish you are either you have big tits or small, either if you are tall or short, ginger or blonde… does not matter they will fetishize you anyways that's how men operate even normies.
>hence why you see men who cheat on their pregnant wives after 10 years of marriage.Those men are either pedophile fuckboys who don't like the fact their wives get more womanly bodies when they get pregnant or they hate the fact they have to grown up and be men who father their own childs, as I have mentioned men are absolute freudian forever momma's boy babies and it could also come from a place of wanting to be a boy forever. Maybe I am trying to understand how males work but if my theories aren't right then it just means men are oversexual creatures who want to fuck everything that is female and I am being retarded by trying to understand the logic behind male sexuality.
No. 2233492
>>2233490They’re fucking disgusting nonna. They lack discipline and they don’t even bother to test themselves, they’re a walking STD toilet.
Getting with the community bicycle is a downfall for any woman.
No. 2233668
>>2233648Like the other nonna said, even if you end up being the first love, you won’t be that very same person he fell in love in that instance. Five years down the line, you might live together, you aren’t as young as before, you have more responsibilities , the honeymoon phase isn’t there anymore and there’s the tranquility of monotony and suddenly “I don’t feel the spark anymore babe..”
Romance is a scam nonna, that has been sold to women to appease us and make us believe that there is truly an exception.
No. 2233712
File: 1730414700199.jpg (31.62 KB, 680x478, ryan-gosling-eating-his-cereal…)
i'd rather be average weight and frumpy looking and continue to enjoy making meals i find rich and delicious every day than be skinnier and have a meaningless relationship with food in order to restrict and maintain the weight.
No. 2234168
File: 1730438624319.webp (6.69 KB, 420x315, grandoa vibes .webp)
This is cute
No. 2234188
>>2232884Also if you are seriously mentally ill you can engage in more risky sex acts making yourself more “hot” to men. Add body dysmorphia to the equation and you’ll get plastic surgery, put on lots of makeup and get your hair done every day. A narc or sociopath will also be more looks conscious and spend a lot of time and money on their outfits.
Being a peaceful self respecting woman looks “boring” to men or at least they see you as the wife material whom they can occasionally cheat on with these “hot women”.
No. 2234364
>>2234361>whatever fake shit normie women haveanon, normie women have genuine connections with each other just like us autists do. please don't be like that.
>But I do get along with much older womenold ladies are fucking metal. i have problems relating to normies my age but my weirdness doesn't faze older women, next to nothing bothers those badasses
No. 2234387
>>2234326hahahahahahahahahha oh my god this is rich
do you know where you are?
this entire imageboard was created to nitpick and judge women
but its somehow worse when you do it in front of men? lol
what kind of mental gymnastics do you have to do to pretend you don't care about men's opinions but then get mad if women include men in talking shit about you
anyway my 2 cents is that women expect a ton more emotional labour in friendships than men do, and its easier for me to have very casual friendships with men on average than it is with women. in the past i'll always hit a wall with women where they expect me to talk to them constantly in group chats or go out with them and get mad when i don't participate.
No. 2234407
>>2234174Nah, the issue is that most women engage in performative femininity and constant male pandering (plus with the added
victim mentality on top, god forbid they get involved with a scrote), and if you don't do these things they become spiteful and jealous towards you. It's pretty hard to find a woman IRL who doesn't care about these things. This is coming from someone who has female friends but it took years to find like-minded people.
No. 2234414
People being friendly online is fake and performative.
>>2234364Old people tend to be easier to get along with because they stop giving a shit. If more people stopped giving a shit the world would be a friendlier place. I don't want to know your entire life story just to hang out with you, I just want some company to enjoy life with sometimes. That's how most friendships should be.
No. 2234517
>>2234506I hope you know that’s not what I was clearly talking about in that post, annoying little retard. You get the most unbalanced, obsessive, codependent and unfocused people because of the kind of love shilled in our world, broke people who decide to fuck, date or marry could’ve spent all of that precious time learning how to not be broke and develop themselves. Love is not a requirement or need of life and it’s not a real thing, it’s an illusion that keeps normies happy, placated and angry. Rich people or those with a clue know “love”, “family” and all of that other nonsensical jazz is just code word for business or transactions that have no deeper value or relevance. Just like a job, your family can abuse you, just like a job, it causes drama. None of these things ultimately matter but accruing power, status and money and manipulation just so people can finally listen to you. Most people haven’t cracked the true rules of this life, it has nothing to do with precious morals that everybody else expects to uphold, it’s always about power plays and power draws. You manipulate, you actually have a higher chance of getting what you want and need. Love will get you absolutely no where and will leave you vulnerable, I actually kind of think that one of the reasons on why love is seen as a higher value is to make people more enslaved, more open and willing to take and withstand abuse and injustice and to indulge into vices which is mostly sexual degeneracy and kinks. I’m sorry if I come across as a sperg and none of you clearly know how to read or understand what people are saying so I’m sure you don’t care but this is somewhat of the truth, encouraging love and relationships is purely a distraction, mainly shilled to us women, and also a business. “Love” is put into songs, movies, music, stories because it’s esoteric codeword for money, business, shares and transactions and nothing else.
No. 2234522
File: 1730469616262.jpeg (78.68 KB, 500x375, IMG_2196.jpeg)
>>2234517Jesus Christ get a fucking grip kek
No. 2234545
>>2234534>>2234517there is nothing more broke and ghetto than "fuck love, i get paper" mentality
really just cringe and embarrassing
i don't really care what comes out of your mouth either way because you're an overcompensating, coping poorfag but you're just so funnily unaware how rejecting the idea of love and family because "money" and "business" is what you're trying to affront to is a totally poor person trying to get out of poverty thing to do
No. 2234547
I judge the women in age gap relationships more than the men in them. It shows a lot of bitches would do anything for money. The. A few years when he throws them away from a younger girl they want to come crying to women that they were groomed. Go away.
No. 2234552
>>2234544What bad choices? Also having a support system bogs women down, having love and care for other people will never be appreciated and underlooked. No matter how much you smile, perform, pretend to be the “good one” to contrast the hideous demonic laziness and shittiness of the males around you will never be appreciated and when you do decide to be vulnerable in the pursuit of “love” especially with a very close female you feel like you can confide in and be supported by they hug you, play the same social interaction buttons but it still feels robotic, empty and pointless and at the root of their advice and their helpful platitudes it’s really just encouraging you to take the same shit they have took because suffering is always justified in their eyes, even if it always hurts more than it’s enjoyable or educational and most of it could’ve been prevented if people weren’t so fucking retarded. It’s all lies and a waste of time, I understand what you’re saying because hermits don’t keep society from running but there’s always miserable caveats to maintain social relationships because the mechanical force is always transactional, take and give, do this for me and do that for me, it’s just like going to a job except it’s people you’re suppose to care about because they sadly decided to shit you in this world or you’re related to them.
No. 2234563
File: 1730471305415.jpeg (192.49 KB, 1164x1551, IMG_4634.jpeg)
>>2234552Whatever you say, kid. Godspeed.
No. 2234569
>>2234566She didn’t feel like getting up to put her dentures and hubble telescope reading glasses on to read my post, sorry granny!
plus I’m in my mid-20s kek>>2234567Go back to LSA
No. 2234575
File: 1730471814034.png (19.49 KB, 250x275, 1695630257048.png)
>>2234566NTA but I think we should bully more anons who can't be bothered to read in arguments they chose to get in. Like you said, this isn't twitter. A part of me genuinely wonders if these people ever read any long books when they were growing up.
No. 2234592
>>2234552>having a support system bogs women down>to contrast the hideous demonic laziness and shittiness of the males around youWell no shit Sherlock. Moids don't belong in a woman's support network because males by default are parasites until they prove that they consistently give more than they take (very rare but technically does exist among a tiny subsection of moids.)
>very close female you feel like you can confide in and be supported by they hug you, play the same social interaction buttons but it still feels robotic, empty and pointlessAnd have you ever told them this? IDK about you but I'm able to tell my friends "Hey, XYZ doesn't help me. Can we do ABC instead?" If a so-called supportive friend can't handle that, you know that you need different friends. Hopefully you're a good enough person to be around that you're able to make those kinds of friends.
No. 2234595
>>2234574Nta but yes they do? Maybe not in the extremely cynical way they're being described by some anons. If someone in my support system (group of friends and a few family members with whom I share mutual trust and love) behaves like an asshole and takes out their personal stress on me when I try to help them, then they're out. I'm not helping them again. Doesn't matter if they're blood-related family or anything. If I need help, I have lots of people I can ask, and we won't be nasty to each other in the process. It takes time to weed out who is worth it (I wasted a lot of energy on trying to support absolutely shitty people who only wanted attention and not actual support). But to say they don't exist is weird.
If you can behave like an adult with some grace and understanding for others, you can form meaningful relationships wherein everyone helps each other when needed. If you behave like a caged animal and snap at the nearest person with good intentions, perhaps over the years there will be no one left who wants to help you.
No. 2234611
>>2234602300 confirmed kills
>>2234609I wish I was born into wealth so I had money and connections to ruin men’s lives and get away with it
No. 2234615
>>2234597Also notice how supercomputers exist but there are no superphones
What would they even do, set a record in scrolling TikTok kek
No. 2235121
File: 1730496585100.jpg (144.71 KB, 897x1156, 1686667617637.jpg)
statistically speaking, in terms of looks the average person MUST be a 5. the vast majority of people then fall between 4 and 6, thats just how normal distribution works. additionally the average person DOES still usually find a partner to marry at some point in their life (about 70% of ppl in america, probably even higher in other countries) so even someone who is a 4 is not so ugly that its unlikely they will ever marry. the average person would find it insulting to be labeled anything lower than a 7, but statistically most will be 5s and 5s are perfectly datable because the average person can still get dates. thank you for coming to my TED talk.
No. 2235196
File: 1730502013474.jpeg (268.22 KB, 1677x1677, 0FF92197-E72D-4578-836D-B1D701…)
Lavender is a pretty flower, but it stinks
No. 2235256
>>2235123Everything. I’d me more quick by pointing out what’s not wrong.
They’re the same as the gay men, only that they’re attracted to us, but still dislike women at the same time.
No. 2235262
File: 1730506611404.jpeg (25.96 KB, 612x322, IMG_9975.jpeg)
>>2235135When you go outside you’ll usually see 5s,6s and 7s and less 8s,9s,10s and 1s,2s,3s,4s. It’s a Gaussian distribution.
No. 2235276
File: 1730507715684.jpg (132.81 KB, 800x776, 1657287367112.jpg)
>>2235271This is like getting mad at people saying poop is nasty because you like eating shit. Nobody is stopping you but everybody else knows it's nasty and you aren't winning good girl points being a happy poop eater here unlike every other website ever
No. 2235278
>>2235271honestly as a lesbian, this entire topic got me thinking in two ways: one, that i think it is a conspiracy that women have been shamed for so long for having the audacity to desire certain traits in a male partner (tall, handsome face, cleanliness, etc) that now we see women with men far less attractive than she is and it isn't fair because its not like he treats her any better than some thunderchad that everyone seethes over…
but then on the other half, i've also seen super happy couples where a guy was quite heavy and the woman is slender, but he treats her so well that it doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. but i see haters coming on top of the her and claiming things like OH YOU KNOW SHE'S WITH HIM FOR THE MONEY when it's not even true. ultimately its just misogyny doing its thing and if you like some guy who isn't conventionally attractive, as long as he isn't as asswipe to you, stop caring for what other people think.
No. 2235296
File: 1730508830714.jpg (Spoiler Image,38.16 KB, 721x1280, IMG_4345.jpg)
>>2235274>>2235276>>2235282>>2235283idgaf
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 2235307
>>2235296He looks so fat and scraggly. I hope this is just a
nonny revengeposting a pickme cause if not damn girl love thyself more.
No. 2235310
File: 1730509918368.gif (1.03 MB, 498x280, 1000018650.gif)
>>2235296>>2235285This is like watching someone willingly eat gas station sushi that was sold by some local crackhead who you just know laced that shit with fentanyl and some smegma. I'm not seething. To seethe means that I give a real fuck about you, and I don't because I don't know you. I am
cringing because a part of my intellect is still aware that this is a stupid idea regardless of whether or not a really give a fuck about you. What's most important is that I'm also entertained by your stupidity to even tongue fuck this laced gas station sushi human equivalent, so go nuts kiddo.
No. 2235311
>>2235310You gave enough of a fuck to reply, so you do give a fuck.
>my intellectWhere?
No. 2235312
>>2235296I
kind of understood what you meant cause some bald guys can have decent bodies, some men can carry a little extra weight well if they are tall, etc.
This neckbeard ain't that. Does he have decent cock or money? If not, then I don't get it.
No. 2235316
>>2235296The jealousy this post has
triggered in less that 25 minutes is also impressive.
(bait) No. 2235328
>>2235316the only thing thats
triggering here is the epi pen in that moids lard
No. 2235333
>>2235311>"you replied so you do care"Not particularly about you. More about caring just enough to express how much I'm kekking and cringing at you.
>"you have no intellect"oh you sweet, summer child. The fact that I'm
not the one defending scrotes that look like they have stashes of all types of CP on their computer says enough about our IQ. One of ours is in the single digits, and it's not mine.
No. 2235344
>>2235333nta but
>oh you sweet summer child>caring about iq>thinking iq represents intelligencenonna do you browse reddit, specifically r/gifted?
No. 2235351
File: 1730512116853.gif (669.32 KB, 154x190, 1ocrky.gif)
>>2235344>more seething because of "muh nigel"yawn, go lick the smegma off your nigel's saggy balls, miss retard. Maybe if you're careful, your yeast infection record can stay as blank as your brain.
No. 2235375
File: 1730513401205.jpeg (14.76 KB, 768x425, ONhsZmWaWa6qyUVI.jpeg)
>>2235296why does he look like salmon andy kek
No. 2235383
>>22353711. idc, i'm happy and he eats the pussy disrespectfully
2. he can carry me over his shoulder and break your nigel's neck
(ban evasion) No. 2235391
File: 1730514313112.gif (5.47 MB, 500x500, 1691964022817.gif)
>>2235296This is bestiality.
No. 2235392
File: 1730514325627.png (15.56 KB, 680x605, GbUgiLrW0AAG-Oo.png)
the nonnas seething at the ragebaiter's ugly nigel probably soyface at this dynamic
No. 2235409
File: 1730514891288.jpg (47.5 KB, 405x720, 1000019382.jpg)
>>2235399Mmmm yeah baby come ere and sit on daddy's face so I can spell the alphabet with my yeasty tongue~
No. 2235414
File: 1730515110996.png (1.41 MB, 701x1131, magnus.png)
>>2235411Yes, his name is Magnus
No. 2235417
File: 1730515205172.gif (2.91 MB, 275x275, 1000018593.gif)
>>2235409He can probably spell the recipe for KFC chicken and mashed potatoes on anon's pussy since that'll be the main thing he thinks about when it's time to "disrespectfully" eat her.
No. 2235418
File: 1730515243642.gif (1004.61 KB, 343x498, discord-mod-kawaii-anime-boy.g…)
>>2235414Kawaii anime boy (him)
No. 2235439
File: 1730517171964.jpg (217.17 KB, 1105x1350, Screenshot_20241101.jpg)
>>2235383>break your nigel's necksorry I only fuck fit dudes in their early 20s
No. 2235704
>>2235687I really don't get why they do that unless it really comes down to making shots easier to compose because it isn't as if men dislike short women. Women don't dislike short women either so why does film artificially increase the actresses' heights? If you need a tall woman hire a tall woman (unless this is all because of discrimination towards tall women?). I've seen negative comments towards short performers like Ariana Grande and Sabrina Carpenter for 'looking too young' and I think people only think that because they're stupid and don't realize they are (mostly) reacting to their heights. Neither Ariana or Sabrina can do anything about their height, are they not supposed to perform or have careers? They don't look like kids, they're just vertically challenged adult women.
In the context of anime/manga and hentai and Western animation it comes down to height being used as a visual shorthand to indicate age. A lot of Anime/manga characters continue to grow until they are 18. Most women are actually done growing by 12-14 but this isn't accurately reflected in the majority of illustrated styles. So when you think about it men with these misconceptions are EXTREMELY dumb and/or autopedos because most of them will have outpaced their mother's height when they themselves were 12-14.
No. 2235713
>>2235704Nta but
>I really don't get why they do that unless it really comes down to making shots easier to compose It is literally this 99% of the time. A frame of two people where one is like 2 feet taller staring down at the short one will always look really stupid unless the short person is like a child, putting shorties on boxes helps to make the shot look more aesthetically pleasing and less distracting.
No. 2235809
File: 1730558291028.webp (18.34 KB, 731x538, IMG_7572.webp)
Most anime boys
do look like girls/women more than men. I often see people post barashit like Free in response to this but in the end most anime boys do not look like this, especially clothed. The face shape/jaw, feminine arms and necks read as female more than male. Not to say that husbandofags are all gay, because so long as you’re imagining a dick it’s straight (and often I see them drawn more masculinely in nsfw anyway)
>>2235704This is like not much to do with your discussion but I don’t think women are done growing by 12-14? I can think of like 2 girls I know who were, but the tall girls especially were not
that tall. People who are done growing at 12 are usually 5’2 or under. I also know women who grew until 20 (I am one kek). Maybe it’s a regional thing, but to me anime has definitely portrayed age well (girls being slightly shorter than women until ~16, which was standard for my school at least).
>most of them will have outpaced their mother's height when they themselves were 12-14How… tall do you think 12-year-olds are? Kek. But at 14 yeah, they would usually be taller.
No. 2235885
File: 1730565376605.jpeg (150.62 KB, 750x1000, IMG_7575.jpeg)
>>2235877That anon isn’t me (original opinion) but when I look up bara it’s just muscular dudes. How is this inaccurate
No. 2235889
White girls who stan kpop women always feel weird. Like they are never not slightly creepy.
>>2235420Kek wait this is so funny
No. 2235933
>>2235918>you know the body type I’m talking aboutYeah, we know you meant muscular or masculine. Why not use those words instead of an unrelated term?
>I don’t know why everyone is so fixated on the misnomer thoughBecause they're conflating muscular with bara even though they're not even the same category of thing at all? It's not our fault that you don't know the difference, anon.
No. 2235976
>>2235973This has been said before and I'll say it again, just because the thread subjects on this website are freaks does not mean the userbase is made up of similar personalities kek.
This isn't an unpopular opinion IRL I know, but yeah it is basic human science that people who feel loved and supported (by whomever they may choose) are happier kek. Responding with shit like "well that'll never be me!! normies gtfo!!" just makes you sound like you choose to be mentally unwell
No. 2235992
>>2235987I think it's disgruntled zoomers looking for a new home but they don't understand the concept of gatekeeping. Their drama-fed brains cannot comprehend that if they act they way they do on twitter this place just
becomes twitter and they're back at square one.
No. 2236000
>>2235992nta i have been using lolcow since 2018 so i’m not technically an oldfag but ive definitely seen dramatically worse bait on this website than
>you’d be happy if you fell in love with someone nonny ♥and really this response just kind of makes you sound like a newfag who considers lolcow to be a “
femcel website”
No. 2236009
>>2236006They don’t, but kids in public school also don’t get banned for mentioning that they’re moids. This place has its own culture. I’m no oldfag, but back when I joined I would have got banned for not integrating but it seems like jannies don’t care anymore. It’s small things but they become bigger (like Twitter-lingo being mostly allowed now) and even I can see how the place is changing.
>>2236007What do you expect? Lurk more.
No. 2236017
>>2235986NTA. Less autistic, more self aware, irreverent, more humourous, less cringe, less infighting, more homogeneous.
>>2235999That's two paragraphs, not reddit spacing. Paragraphs are basic post formatting that makes a post easier to read. On image boards paragraphs are spaced with a line break because pressing tab doesn't indent. We have newfags claiming to be oldfags while posting newfaggotry.
No. 2236027
>>2236012What? All I did is point it out since it was relevant, I wasn’t a part of the conversation before. If you’ve been here for a while, are you seriously going to act like this wasn’t considered unintegrated? Really?
>>2236017I mean, I was banned for less in the past. Paragraphs are good for formatting, but usually for longer posts.
>>2236014Ok? I just responded to your reply. What did you expect me to do kek
>>2236019I hate on TikTok and 4chan too and I definitely don’t use them. Retarded logic.
No. 2236041
>>2236040What are you talking about? also
>arguing about useless shit right after school It is 11 am in burgerland.
No. 2236042
>>2236016>>2236029There’s your answer, stuff like this. Personally I don’t care about it since it’s so minor but in the past that would have gotten an (integrate) or (twitterfag), that is just an observation.
>>2236031Are you actually… dumb? I’ve interacted with people who use Twitter before. I’ve seen screenshots of Twitter. Coincidentally I
also have a superpower that lets me know how to recognise incel scrotes without even going on incel forums! Curious! Use your fucking brain.
>>2236032It was
>>2235976 before this dumb discussion started. I don’t even have an opinion on the actual topic.
No. 2236061
>>2235809Estrogen causes the growth plates to ossify and the bones will be fully ossified about 2 years after a girl starts menstruating. Since the average age of menstruation now starts at 12 that means those girls will have reached their adult height by 14, usually they can get 1-2 inches in height between then. The later you start your period the more years of growth you get. Stunted height is a concern with precocious puberty for that reason.
When I said girls were done growing by 12-14 I didn't mean they were done growing at 12 but that their growth capped out between those two ages.
No. 2236075
>>2236063I think they look nice on certain bodies. They look best on someone with short hips and a long torso and medium sized boobs. I have a really short torso so I've only ever owned one pair of pants that was actually high waisted on me. I personally find them less comfortable than lower rises because they squish your stomach when you sit.
I prefer skirts to be high waisted though.
No. 2236080
>>2236061I get what you’re saying but I’m the ayrt, I got my period at 11 and am still growing about to turn 20. I grew 3 inches in the past like year. So… Yeah idk. Don’t trust it much. Anecdotally most girls got their period at 12 but continued to grow until 15-16, whereas the friend who got her period late (15) had already stopped growing before then (like 13-14)
Thinking about it though, it’s interesting that even though there are lots of people who stop growing in their early teens how much other parts of you change kek. Like you could cap at 5’1 at twelve but you’ll still look so different by 20.
>>2236069Zoomer is a mindset
No. 2236083
>>2236059The concept of reddit spacing started on 4chan somewhere around 2011. It was speculated that reddit spacing looked like this -
This is reddit spacing.
It features a line break between each sentence.
It is different to using paragraphs.
It was supposed to be a habit of reddit posters due to quirks in the formatting on reddit at the time and anyone posting like this was a redditor that didn't belong on 4chan. If this was ever true or not I don't know because I've never posted on reddit. The constant paranoia over reddit spacing was so bad that when moot created /q/ he word filtered "reddit" to "ribbit".
LC being a /cgl/ splinter still maintains it's distaste for reddit spacing, as do most image boards.
No. 2236093
>>2236090ntayrt i’m from this post
>>2236081 and yeah i have made multiple posts in this thread and do use the term anon regularly? i’m not sure if you think you’re like solving a mystery or something but all i asked was if you’re an actual mod who does choose to take on the job of babysitting all of us, or if you’re just a regular anon who tries to minimod kek…
No. 2236103
>>2236101>anons will jump on me if I tell you minus the keks you type like a twittard. I hear your little droning valley girl voice in my head and everything. But yeah no I’m sure I’m just being schizo and you’ve actually been using LC from circa 1999 or something.Jesus fucking Christ. NTA but what even is the problem at this point? And it gets kind of annoying after a while to see so many anons repeating
>twittard>twitterfag lingo>you type like its twitter!But still not even be able to specify what twitterfag lingo is? It sounds like you just want to infight but don't have any material.
No. 2236108
>>2236103nta but maybe you don’t visit this thread often, but this retard likes to perch here and just interject with useless quips like
>>2236081 >>2236046
>>2236016 that are all formatted the same. there are other posts of theirs i can recognise too but even though they’ve not exactly said anything wrong they’re always in infights and yeah, it is kinda grating. if i couldn’t pick up on it i wouldn’t care either
No. 2236150
>>2236137Joshua Connor Moon is the guy who created kiwi farms and eventually branched off into lolcow.farm
>>2236147That is what we're told, yes. But we have no legitimate way of knowing this for certain.
No. 2236156
>>2236105Kek but that’s just how you type.
>>2236122>>2236144I thought they were funny.
No. 2236202
File: 1730579033254.jpg (80.42 KB, 600x599, 1658039944440.jpg)
>>2235901Based and true but the anon very obviously equals love with moids and posted it as a passive aggressive reaction to nonnies rightfully bullying the fat ugly balding moid.
No. 2236207
>>2236196If your standards are this
>>2235383 sure kek.
No. 2236232
>>2236230Once again anon, my post does not say "romantic love is the key to happiness" kek. It says "I think all of you would be happier
if you found love"
No. 2236237
>>2236234No, are you 12? Also that was my first post in this dumb debacle
>>2236232You know what that implies you mong omg this whole website is a merry go round of autists
No. 2236332
>>2236326> And your infighting about literally nothing is normal?nta but are we really gonna start pretending like this
isn’t what the unpopular opinions thread exists for kek?
No. 2236374
File: 1730583642742.gif (683.38 KB, 220x164, girl-freaking-out-screaming.gi…)
STOP INFIGHTING ITS NOT EVEN FUNNY
No. 2236389
>>2236365>t. shut up>>2236370they seriously think soyjaks are the end of the world but not gore or cp that's been spammed here constantly before
>>2236371nope it's clear newfag behavior and they're being coddled by the mods
>>2236372seriously they really don't and of course you get dogpiled because most of the users are just newfags who are being catered to. damned are the people who actually used this site including the ones who even used it 4 years ago and know what common lolcow etiquette is
No. 2236397
>>2236361>makes new threads and thinks the subject line is to create the titleI like this, sorry
>talks about retarded internet garbage like yumes and fujoshisbeen a part of LC forever
>asks why the website looks flipped no idea this was possible and I've been on this site forever
>incapable of reading long posts and paragraphs because of their mush brained attention spans agreed but I think this is a general change in internet culture bc people are too self conscious to effort post anymore. I guess people think that is cringe now or they don't want to effortpost unless they can monetize it
idk I think I'm just too chill and loosey goosey to care about a lot of the things you listed I just scroll past
No. 2236406
>>2236361Something I've been considering is that the trajectory of LC is going to be that of 4chan.
What changed 4chan from a nerd hobby website for weebs and neurodivergents was that moot allowed politics and even created a dedicated board for it. This brought users that where coming to the site purely politics. Stormfront infiltrated /pol/ changing the board from edgy libertarianism to pro-Nazism. This would then leak out into other boards that weren't even political. moot realized his mistake far too late and it wasn't until gamergate started that he finally made an effort to contain it.
No. 2236433
>>2236425Its quite simple: merge back /ot/ and /m/, the way LC used to be. That's it. All that said I understand that sounds like a bad idea in light of the recent attack on /ot/. But I do think it would be better for board culture. I'd also allow people to hide threads they dislike in catalog view and permanently filter/hide threads based on thread title keywords.
I would move all nation/foreign language threads to their own board and the screencaps thread would be moved to /meta/.
No. 2236467
>>2236412To be fair the problems started before the old admin. I think /m/ has had mixed results. While it removed some of the more relaxed threads from /ot/, it probably saved these threads from the political infighting that plagues the rest of /ot/.
Burritomin is also an example of why appeasement doesn't work. Political ideologues don't care about the site or it's intended purpose. They care about having a platform to spread their political opinions and intentionally seek to bring in more ideologues. Again this is exactly what happened on 4chan. During the 2016 election /pol/ brought in thousands of newfags that weren't interested in anything other than politics. It drove out whatever remained of the original user base and the entire site went to complete shit because everything was politics.
LC isn't quite at that point but it's getting there.
No. 2236471
>>2236464>they claim this website isn’t for us it’s to make fun of usThis is such a dumb claim for them to make. The only people who'd get invested enough in weeb, fujoshi, lolita, etc milk and cows to post on a literal imageboard about them are those who are already deep into the subject matter as a hobby or interest. Normies don't give a shit. They see someone funny walking down the street, film it and move on. The most sleuthing they'll do is link a friend a TikTok from some ugly/annoying person and have a laugh, they don't need an anonymous space and would likely be creeped out by one.
Cow culture is for "weirdos". Imageboards are for "weirdos". Normie LARPers need to get the fuck out.
I do agree that /pol/tards and misogynists should be banned, because they want to turn this place into an outpost of their shit spaces.
No. 2236502
>>2236492i miss PULL. there isn't enough gossip sites around anymore in the likes of it or lipstick alley. there was a divide between the type of people/things posted such as youtuber drama or celeb gossip which was nice if you weren't the type to care much about going on a deep dive on specific autists like lc or kf but was still entertaining
>>2236498dnc propaganda is insane to witness. i hate conservatards too but you can't convince me that what you see over there isn't very contrived kek
No. 2236553
File: 1730595550711.jpg (396.14 KB, 1600x1200, 1000018811.jpg)
I can kind of see why some people are scared of rabbits or hares. Their ears are wildly big in proportion to their bodies. It's trippy when you think about it like that.
No. 2236570
>>2236464>And yet some retards seriously think this website isn’t for weird women like weebs, fujoshis, lolitas, autistsThe problem seems to stem from a misunderstanding, non-normalfag refers to people who are interested in typically nerd hobbies and generally don't participate in pop culture. It doesn't mean asocial NEET that never goes outside. It's possible to be a friendless shut in and still be a normalfag because non-normalfaggotry is defined by interests, the ability to discuss those interests and the ability integrate.
>allowing /2X/ is extremely justifiedI thought /2X/ was a great idea at the time it was created. I expected it to depoliticize /ot/, reduce infighting and be a dedicated space for discussing gender critical, various forms a feminism and the erosion of women's rights. Instead it exists as a corpse and shows why trying to appease ideologues doesn't work. Note that by ideologue I'm referring to the posters that only come here for politics, not actual farmers that just want to discuss women's political issues without moid harassment.
>devolved into some Kamala thread which makes me tinfoil they have people who go on here just to explicitly advertise their politicians to get them to vote, it’s so annoying and transparentI agree. The level of shilling is like nothing I've ever seen on LC before.
No. 2236579
>>2236570I don't think it gets used enough to warrant maintaining it. I think it's better it get shuttered and archived. I thought it getting made was a bad move, it didn't please anyone. I think the ideal would be to hand the archive over to someone else to spin if off into it's own board fully apart from lolcow.
As for Kamala eh I don't think it's that strange, USAnona's want a Total Woman Victory and Trump is really bad and his running mate is a weirdo. I hope in the future we can get a competent Republican female candidate and a more moderate political climate in general. I like for my politicians to be boring.
No. 2236580
>>2236566Holy shit, that is such a good way to put it. It is disturbing how easy it is for a rabbit to have such a mental breakdown at any sudden loud noise. They are the first animals I've ever heard of to possess the ability to be
literally scared to death. Like, what in the fuck? Even wild rabbits are like the incarnate of pure, unfiltered anxiety. They are one of the most psychologically broken animals I've ever seen, and yet people widely agree that they are one of the very cutest. What a strange fucking species.
No. 2236582
>>2236580My sister's hamster was scared to death once. She left her window open for a breeze and a stray cat got in and tried to kill the hamster. Our own cat intervened to protect the hamster from the intruder. The stray was chased out but the hamster had had a heart attack.
My sister was able to bring him back by doing chest compressions.
No. 2236591
File: 1730597131318.jpg (77.81 KB, 564x550, 1000018754.jpg)
>>2236582what the fuck? You can do chest compressions on animals that fucking small?
No. 2236630
>>2236591>>2236588>>2236585Yes, she and my mom took turns giving it chest compressions. Both my mom and I have also had to give chest compressions to kittens before. With the kittens we were also able to breathe air into them as well but I'm not sure if that happened with the hamster and I'm kind of doubting so because it's so small. You have to give the compressions at a faster heartrate than with a human.
Between the two I think my sister resuscitating the hamster was more impressive. I know it was at least 15 minutes of chest compressions. The hamster was rezzed and was perfectly fine after and lived a good while.
No. 2237266
70% of divorces are initiated by women, and that shows that men would rather cheat on their wives than divorce them and be with someone else, they want all the benefits a heterosexual marriage can offer (free cooking, free sex, free house chores, free emotional support) without having the decency of respecting its 'morals'.
Many men don't even want a family, they just like the aesthetic of having a wife and children, they're accessories, to be brought out to shine like jewels do on special occasions, don't marry sisters, it's a doomed affair, and your best case scenario is a divorce, the other option is much more devastating, because most women who are murdered, meet such fate at the hands of their husbands or a close male they knew.
No. 2237271
File: 1730633570377.jpg (35.33 KB, 540x360, b300eb08b4c374372416dec7a53251…)
>>2236630>>2236582This is such a sweet story, I'm glad your cat stepped in to protect the hamster, and that your sister could revive him nonna
No. 2237286
File: 1730636979735.png (177.37 KB, 727x1715, awallofredditmoidsseething.png)
The internet archive is shit
"Stop killing games" is shit
anti-intellectual property moids are shit
The Internet Archive is a piracy mill of creators works, porn, and nothing of value to the average person that can't be accessed in legal ways like a library or illegal but largely singular instances of piracy through committed research online. Also Intellectual property and its facets of copyright, trademark and patents are good. Those seething from it are usually losers with no skills or work to offer the world and therefore no stake in any of the matter other than consumption. They feel entitled to everything that the skilled producers of works produce. Entitlement comes from the consumer being flooded with media of all kinds constantly while not producing anything of value themselves. Add to this the access of media freely available for consoomption by piracy like the internet archive and you have retarded movements like the moid vidya game "preservation" movement of "stop killing games" or rather "stop killing my entitlement to your games".
Time, effort, talent and skill are hard earned and used this is understood to be the cost of intellectual property but consoomers don't care about this, they think because a computer can make copies of things they're owed everyones photographs, art, code, videos and all. This entitlement quickly turns into an entitlement to rape and strip women naked digitally using deepfakes and an entitlement to child abuse material. I can counterfeit currency but its not legal or just. Counterfeit is more respectable than bemoaning others protection over their skills and products. Anti IP moids often use big bad Disney, EA, Ubisoft or other big corpo company strawmans as excuses to steal peoples work, when you could also just not consoom Disney and EA slop. The mentality of anti-intellectual property always comes down to control and power of the producers skills and products to maximize consumption for the consumer and erase effort of the producer. Its essentially "this product should be free for me to consume but not for thee to produce".
Something that stuck out to me from the stop killing games "movement" is that the moid organizing it when being presented the idea of boycotting the companies that "destroy games" argued that boycotts wouldn't work and that they prefer to "vote with their votes" instead of "voting with their wallets" as if everyone need be drip feed the sustenance of Ubisoft or we'll all collapse like Type I diabetics without an insulin shot. This is not a vital need like food and water; its video-games, creative works for consumption. As if voting with your wallet isn't the primary way to kill the business of a company. The internet archive going down has been a massive wake up call to me that moids possessive need to consume can never be sated. I've heard few women say shit about the autistic "stop killing games" shit, likely because women aren't retards who obsess over video games and instead play them for fun, but some here have expressed negative sentiments about the internet archive being hacked. I'm curious what others think.
No. 2237293
>>2237289read the post again. If you don't know anything about the things in my post like stop killing games I'd prefer if you didn't engage much.
>and nothing of value to the average person that can't be accessed in legal ways like a library or illegal but largely singular instances of piracy through committed research online.I've got no problem with piracy on a individual level like we all do, the problem is entitlement to others work without compensation outright. Pirating should be encouraged for companies like Adobe kek.
No. 2237299
>>2237286I love piracy. Whenever possible, I will pay after I've decided I like the product, not before. I'm glad that shitty corporations are no longer as able to force advertising on our eyes and shill aggressively to make people pay money for garbage before they know it's garbage. This is true meritocracy. Loving a movie, book, album, game, etc enough to want to support and fund the creators yourself, not being tricked into funding trash. I wish large record labels and Hollywood would take a much bigger hit so they'd be forced to make things of actual quality, but that'll probably never happen. Access to studies and scientific data should never be paywalled to the general population, either, especially since the actual researchers are rarely ever getting the biggest cut.
I'm not familiar with any videogame-specific movement, but in most cases, preservation is good, too IMO. Moronic boomer-run companies deciding no one should be able to play a game or read a book because it doesn't make them as much money (especially when they're going against the creator's will) can and should always be subverted. I love The Internet Archive because I enjoy having access to rare books and the "old" internet.
I disagree with equating piracy to porn and deepfake addiction. Playing a game, listening to a song or reading a book isn't even close to rape or spreading CP except in the minds of rapist and budding serial killer lunatics who would've had the same entitlement regardless, as we've seen throughout history.
No. 2237315
>>2236985Some people have
abusive parents. Sick of faggots with normal parents making fun of people who went through hell just because they got unlucky. You have no fucking idea
No. 2237342
>>2237328There are
valid arguments against having children but this "life is hard sad face" shit ain't it
No. 2237346
>>2237342It is a
valid reason but most people who want kids don’t want to acknowledge that they’re creating more suffering because it makes them feel bad and they want their cute baby, they don’t really care about the inevitable suffering they will eventually face
No. 2237348
>>2237299Your philosophy of consuming media is largely identical to mine.
>Access to studies and scientific data should never be paywalled to the general population, either, especially since the actual researchers are rarely ever getting the biggest cut. While I agree this will always persist, higher education will always be gatekept. Its gatekept even when you're a student at institutions but lets not kid, the internet archive has as much porn as it has educational content on it. Terry Pratchett and 50 Shades isn't "educational content" and can be easily picked up at brick and mortar stores or thrift shops in decent condition or pirated anywhere as a pdf. The issue is not availability. The excuse that the internet archive is archiving "valuable information" as a digital library is weak and its no surprise it lost its court case. pdfs are widely easy to pirate everywhere.
>Moronic boomer-run companies deciding no one should be able to play a game or read a book because it doesn't make them as much money (especially when they're going against the creator's will) can and should always be subverted. Does this ever happen? going against the creators will? Nearly everything can be pirated across the web. Very often this goes against the creators will (not that I'm cursing it) its just fact. If the argument is that boomers gate keep creators work and this goes against creators will doesn't piracy also do that often for some creators?
>Even if you "own" the game. No one reads the EULAs of software that state you own a license to the game not the game itself. With Valve games you own a license to Counterstrike and Gmod but if you are VAC banned you have broken the EULA and are banned from playing the games. They are basic rules for using a software that you bought and have chosen to use, made by the developer. This movement seeks to remove and get around EULAs despite them being basic grounds for all software, not just video-games. No one respects the EULA of Adobe (and that's a good thing) but online games in particular have cheating as rules explicitly forbidden in EULAs. Some EULAs are shit and predatory and the writing of them should be regulated but they exist for a reason in the case of online games and the wishes of the developer. Before you download a software or before installing it they often pop up and you have the option to accept or refuse them, its just that consumers don't read the shit that they buy and consume. Its also because the majority of people are tech inept and retarded.
>I'm not familiar with any videogame-specific movement, but in most cases, preservation is goodPreservation is not yours to decide though, I agree with the sentiment but I feel its used by the moids in this movement to control access to works solely for maximum consumption of authors works and not preservation. Some games become vaporware and are preserved well like No One Lives Forever, they're taken off shelves and are unable to be accessed by consumers but the primary argument in the movement seems to focus on live-service games and moids entitlement to the dopamine drip fed content of them, not preservation. Nintendo cracks down on emulation but it will never stop its games being pirated. Someone committed enough will always preserve them. Preservation is only a issue in specific cases where the game is so old there were finite copies available, or the game is re-released and the previous is taken off shelves for purchase, or the server dies in live service games. The former are solved by the open and availability of the internet and the latter is not the problem to be solved by producers. MMOs die and with no playerbase they're dead. Games like The Crew have sequels, though the original should be made single player and playable offline but you cannot mandate videogames be made with a particular ruleset in mind since they're creative products of many peoples labor and effort drawing from multiple disciplines, much with copyrighted works. Videogames have art in them which is copyrightable too.
>I disagree with equating piracy to porn and deepfake addiction. Playing a game, listening to a song or reading a book isn't even close to rape or spreading CP except in the minds of rapist and budding serial killer lunatics who would've had the same entitlement regardless, as we've seen throughout history.This is not what I said or meant. The skirting of peoples privacy and ownership is similar to the entitlement that these moids have to others work including private photographs, writing and other creative works. The non-stop entitlement to consumption and flagrant disregard for others labor begets entitlement which causes skirting of the boundaries of women and children. The amount of times I've seen men say if your photos are public they're mine, including those of children and rape. The right to be forgotten clashes with the bullshit idea of the "preservation" of media. Moids will "preserve" the rape of women on camera and CSAM as much as they'll preserve their vidya. I may have a cynical attitude towards this but the data doesn't work against me. CSAM consumption is at a all time high and the prevalence of revenge "porn" and rape in porn is incredibly common place now. Its also worth mentioning that rapes have been steadily trending upwards since 2013, so none of this is imaginary concern.
>>2237301>But piracy is the prime way to "vote with your wallet".I guess it wasn't a successful movement because no one knows about it here kek. Not what I said nor whats being argued. I support piracy like you've described, it is the best way to vote with your wallet. The movement is against this since its seen as ineffective. Instead they want to regulate that developers put in place long life plans for video games that the consumer purchased. For context the video linked has the quote I was talking about in my original post at the 24 minute mark. You've confused different things like most here and think my post was just shitty anti-piracy propaganda since no one knows about this movement. I guess women largely don't give a shit about video game shit seeing as how artistically entitled this "movement" is. I have an interest in it because I feel like it ties in with the concept of intellectual property and AI slop exploitation as a whole in its shitty treatment of creators and entitlement to their creations. I think the idea of entitlement to creators work and the discrediting of intellectual property is increasing in the modern age of mass media availability and consumption.
No. 2237379
>>2237346I've known many parents and parents-to-be and ask them why they want to have kids. I've yet to hear a single reason that isn't profoundly selfish in some way. The friends of mine who opted
not to have children tell me reasons that regard the hypothetical child's well-being more than the parents' reasons. I always find that really weird that ime the people who don't want kids care more about a child's quality of life than the people who want children.
No. 2237480
>>2237198It's not an 'elite' brand but do you have any La Michoanas near you? They sell Mexican style ice cream and other frozen goods. I prefer Mexican style ice cream to regular ice cream, it's worth a shot.
For store accessible brand Dreyers makes a good one. There's a difference between 'Vanilla Bean' and 'French Vanilla' and you will have to try both to see which you like better. I think your best bet will be to go to an independent ice creamery so you don't have to commit to a whole tub.
No. 2237487
>>2237286My issue with The Internet Archive is how it is used for AI training and looking at the Internet Archive's creator's past interviews in shit it sounds like that was the entire point of the Internet Archive this whole time. It's depressing because the Archive is so useful for historic research so if you have issues with AI in order to be consistent you have to be against the Archive itself.
I don't agree with all of your points but I do agree with a lot of them. The anti-copyright people without fail turn out to be extremely annoying and entitled and mostly male (what a coincidence). But you should always pirate Adobe.
No. 2237501
>>2237299>I wish large record labels and Hollywood would take a much bigger hit That has already happened, the music industry is a shell of it's former self
>so they'd be forced to make things of actual qualityDemonstrably, that is not what happens. Instead they go harder on generic appeal. In the context of music that means the Taylor Swifts of the music world. In the context of Hollywood it means films becoming more generic in attempts to appeal to as many demographics as possible.
Film/tv has not adjusted to streaming well. There's not enough money in it and production costs are high. Long term this means we are due a massive contraction meaning a lot less stuff gets made (so less to stream, let alone pirate). The most popular stuff, what actually gets watched, is usually dumb shit because most people are dumb shits and that dumb shit subsidizes the production of good stuff (that a minority watches). So if Hollywood has to trim down the dumb shit is what survives because it gets more views. There's no possibility of Hollywood suddenly consistently making things of actual quality because that requires viewers be smarter and have good taste.
No. 2237551
>>2237286>This entitlement quickly turns into an entitlement to rape and strip women naked digitally using deepfakes and an entitlement to child abuse material.That's a moid problem, though. Not a problem with being anti-copyright or anti-intellectual property itself.
But that aside, I do agree that the way they treat stuff like video games as if those were so vital is mega cringe, and I like video games. I pirate a lot, and I hate current copyright laws and how rich big corpos can fuck you over if you use their product in a way they don't like, and how they keep coming up with the most predatory ways to drain their customers' wallets and sell your info to advertise more useless bullshit to you (i.e. Microsoft), but I don't promote or discuss that "stop killing games" shit or anything of the sort because I don't give a fuck about that specific movement.
No. 2237555
File: 1730658813189.png (1.43 MB, 929x981, lunette.png)
Aliexpress isn't a bad website for clothing shopping, you just have to dig a little deeper. You can find independent shops located in usually China that sell their clothing for cheaper there.
No. 2237559
>>2237286I'm generally anti piracy and get so fucking tired of people's entitlement to everything. They always say it's like a museum or preservation but guess fucking what? Museums are physical places you need to travel to and some cost entrance fees. Libraries are maintained by employees paid for by the government and they have to be donated or buy copies of books. There is already such a thing as a digital library it's called the fucking library and you can access it by putting your fucking library card in an app called Libby. Handing out endless copies for free for forever is not a library or archival it's just piracy. It's not Liderallee Fahrenheit 451 to take that shit down.
I think copyright exists for a very
valid reason and every single copyright abolitionist I've had to suffer through has always been a pathetic, poor, or stingy man baby who didn't want to pay for anything because he got used to it before the internet got bigger. For example music covers: I don't think covering rights for songs should cost as much as they do but if you think of it, is it not the right of the copyright holder to yank down your cover if they see fit? You go through the effort of making a song and somebody sings over it and what if people download that instead of yours. You should have the right to take it down or claim the revenue.
The only other thing I can agree with pirates on is DRM. I have a different eReader than my girlfriend so we can't read each other's books on our own devices. It's a BOOK I bought and paid for I should be able to have in on any device. At least for video games they need to be tuned to work on each system.
Sometimes media just disappears from memory and thats ok.
One last vent is I really DGAF if Nintendo protects their copyright more than other companies. It's their prerogative, they have something of great value they can do what they want with it.
No. 2237589
File: 1730661055059.jpg (55.18 KB, 546x724, 57a2fb602715b283215cd6b9dc6bc4…)
>>2237555I'm happy you're able to find hideous clothing at a cheap price.
No. 2237707
File: 1730669366583.jpg (347.75 KB, 800x1187, marke_by_alexpascenko-d5xwt0l.…)
I hate tourists who go to a foreign country and don't even bother learning one word of the local language (went to Japan recently, saw a lot of tourists do this exact shit). Or when they go to a foreign country and don't like the food there. Saw a Spanish-speaking couple do this in a restaurant I was in (the scrote was eating this ice cream with matcha powder sprinkled on it, and he called it "weird" under his breath to his gf).
No. 2237835
File: 1730676490571.jpeg (180.25 KB, 1170x560, IMG_4087.jpeg)
>>2237559Not everyone lives near a library or has access to a digital library. And besides no library is going to have access to every book, and their collection depends where it’s located. My local library is very small and doesn’t have access to the sorts of books I want to read, I pirate because I don’t want to spend exorbitant amounts of money buying them and having them shipped to me. They also don’t have access to books that are out of print, like Andrea Dworkin’s books have only this year been reprinted, the only reason women have been able to read her work is because people pirated them and shared them. Her work may have been lost otherwise.
I do like playing video games, especially older video games that are out of print and thus aren’t sold anymore either in stores or on digital storefronts. I pirate them because it’s too expensive to buy them second hand, take picrel for instance $460 for a used copy and that’s the cheapest listing I can find, it regularly goes for over $1000. And that’s just the game not including the console itself, it’s not reasonable to expect people to drop hundreds to thousands of dollars to play older games, especially since none of the money goes to the developer anyway.
No. 2237874
File: 1730679529761.jpg (16.07 KB, 739x415, gr.jpg)
i don't get the hatred against gypsy rose right now, especially since everybody online outside of LC are foaming at the mouth over the menendez brothers from their murders after 35 years in prison. the brothers and gypsy both were severely abused by their parents, yet one are heralded as heroes, while the other one should be stoned to death. i just love how men can murder people in cold blood and still have endless fans after them, but a woman tells SOMEONE ELSE to do the deed for her, and she deserves to die in prison? not that i'm saying i don't believe any abuse happened to the brothers, but i find this to be hypocritical of normies to hate gypsy but masturbate over the brothers getting out of prison this christmas. either you believe all victims, or none.
No. 2237891
>>2237874I've noticed the women complaining about her either are pickmes crying over the fact that the rapist autist is in prison for life while she's free (good), upset she's not a perfect
victim and is attention-seeking and manipulative, or believe she was in on the scam with her mother.
No. 2237916
>>2237914Whenever I feel the urge to say "girl" the way I would during an exchange IRL I just replace it with
nonny/anon kek
No. 2237919
>>2237348I don't think these video game 'preservationists' realize that a lot of the multiplayer games they want to preserve don't entail a simple matter of companies offering a program for interested users to download. It's more complicated than that and would require the companies to continue to spend money to keep these moribund games on life support. And as you said, with no player base there's no game even if the servers are running.
Things change and things die. People have to accept that not everything can be preserved. Document what you can and move on.
No. 2237932
>>2237918i'm no doctor so in the end i can't say much about her condition right now, but the wheelchair thing really made me realize how much her mom lied so much over the years that at this point i don't think i could ever believe that gypsy was truly that sick to be begin with. maybe she's born with some abnormalities, sure, but her being supposedly unable to walk or having full blown cancer were just wild ways to obtain media attention on her mom's part i think.
whatever, once the menendez brothers get out and everybody inevitably turn their backs on them i hope they never bring up gypsys's name again.
No. 2237957
>>2237948I think you are misunderstanding the base of OP's contention. There's a movement called "Stop Killing Games" which is trying to pass legislation to obligate studios offer end of life patches so people can play games without needing to connect to servers. In the context of single player games that is understandable but it doesn't work so well for multiplayer games. Lots of multiplayer games can't be run homebrew you need access to special software (which can require special licenses) and even if all that could be sorted out the game is dead when the playerbase has moved on. This isn't a matter of pirating an .exe file.
I think the sentiment is nice but at the same time I do think there's an unwillingness to let go that isn't healthy. It's like a digital packrat mentality. In the case of games that can't be adequately preserved we need to develop standards for alternate means of documentation like organizing matches and recording them (for instance).
No. 2238015
>>2237891Add pedo and necrophiliac too. He played porn and masturbated in the middle of a mcdonalds with kids present while carrying a concealed knife and was arrested for it, at age 23. On record for anyone to find. The report and local news articles on it.
Wanted to rape deedee as part of the attack that night and had to be talked out of that part. Had talked about necrophilia fantasies before and saw it as his chance to make the fantasy real. Talked about wanting to impregnate gypsy, wanting to.. 'fuck her daughter' Not hearsay convos that rely on her recollections. It was evidence shown in court, messages taken from their devices that people used to know about before this new flood of tards rushed in wanting to have strong opinions on it but only wanting to base their opinions off of tiktoks and youtube vids. Then they wonder why he was sentenced the way he was. Skipping ever looking into the court case yet declaring it was a travesty
No. 2238063
File: 1730694425413.gif (2.56 MB, 374x374, floreyonce-kamala-harris.gif)
I'm glad that zoomer twitterfags are bringing the art of the GIF back even if they're cringe and gay. I love GIFs, they're so expressive and bring life to any forum/site. I will always use twitterfag GIFs, 'till the day I die.
No. 2238067
File: 1730694610317.gif (24.59 KB, 220x219, contemplating2218443222.gif)
>>2237937my mistake yeah the brothers weren't acting in their right minds at the time of the murder since they strongly believed that jose and kitty were about to do them in first so they did it out of self defense. i absolutely agree with you on the rest, if anything these two cases makes me wonder if i should've acted on my vengeful feelings when i got abused by people before instead of listening to assholes telling me "noooo you should just forgive your aboosers they are human beans too!" because now its like… they got their forgiveness and can continue living their lives abusing other people freely. saging for emotional sperging kek but you right
nonnie you right.
No. 2238105
File: 1730697154770.gif (54.76 KB, 328x328, GdrCoffee5.gif)
>>2238063Did the art of the gif ever really die?
No. 2238138
File: 1730699274233.gif (16.49 MB, 1449x2216, 85y00x00iigd1.gif)
KEK incel type?! Why? Just the way he looks?
>>2238121Dont listen to her, I likely know the lore better than she does. Gary is not an incel, he's just a scientist although on your second ever mission he does almost kill you by making you ride his prototype sled down a mountain and you get lost in the wilderness. He is not an incel, and his inventions are mostly pretty neat. Maybe she's a Rookie fan?
No. 2238251
>>2238185I think it is entitled to expect a company to foot the bill to indefinitely maintain servers for 5 people to use every now and then. Things don't last forever. Bread molds, clothes fray, and multiplayer live service games lose playerbase and companies lose the financial slack to support the games forever and ever. Don't spend stupid amounts of money on in-game cosmetics and battlepasses and learn to move on.
The Stop Killing Games thing has suggested games being advertised with how long the games will be supported for at minimum and I think that's a good suggestion.
No. 2238611
>>2238444Impossible because
I am the only poster on lolcow.
No. 2238644
File: 1730737879600.jpg (28.43 KB, 500x500, 1000052680.jpg)
My unpopular opinion is that I'm fucking hilarious. No one thinks I'm funny. Nobody laughs at my jokes but it's okay because I laugh at my jokes.
No. 2238779
>>2238697I understand your point wrt to Bratz, but this is a whole different beast. The lyrics are the weirdest thing about it to me. There's something clearly wrong with it even though I can't quite describe it.
Lyrics:
https://genius.com/18766631 No. 2238808
>>2238697I agree that the creators of the poop unicorns aren't pedos. I think it's a case of extreme misinterpretation of marketing charts. Ponies are popular amongst little girls, dolls that emulate trendy teenagers/young adults are popular amongst girls and (for some reason) baby dolls that shits and pees are popular amongst girls.
Some executives for a toy company thought that combining a bunch of trends together would result in maximum profit, completely unaware of how disturbing the end result is
No. 2238831
>>2238792>We munch on my poop pizzasCoprophilia
>Gonna get loopy off my poopy!Are they talking about consuming the poop-slime to get high?
>I drive my parents crazy, the poop I need every day-ay-ay-ay (ay-ay-ay)This is probably just to encourage kids to nag their parents until they buy their product but:
>She's smelling fart shake up swagWhat the hell does this mean?
>Whenever we get down>We spread sparkly poop for brownAnd also this???
>>2238808Tbh that's probably the case, but I'm also convinced at least someone involved in the creation of this was getting off to putting their fetish out in the open.
No. 2239012
File: 1730746431926.jpg (72.13 KB, 670x503, 1726296014314222.jpg)
kamala is probably going to lose tomorrow, unfortunately. there's no good polls or news to look at (both sides are saying there's bad voter turnout for the opposite side) but if you look at it logically
>red voters are more rabid and less doomers than blue
>there are way less men likely to vote for kamala than for trump
>more men are going to vote for trump
>plenty of NLOG, bible thumping, pick me, boymom trumpets are going to vote for trump
>all kamala is left with is a chunk of woman voters and a handful of male voters
i just seriously cannot believe hoe a country like america, what is supposed to be the most "developed" nation in the world, has allowed itself to get swindled by fucking trump of all people for a SECOND time. AFTER already seeing how he accomplished absolutely nothing the first time he was president.
No. 2239247
File: 1730751875883.jpg (31.75 KB, 614x600, 18581679_224155498085606_39733…)
Constitutional rights should start being taken away from those who can be verified as anti-social misanthropes. They should be backhandled and forced out of their childish way of life and looking at the world by higher institutions. Don't care if they pay taxes. In fact laughing at them for "paying for nothing" until they bend the knee is righteous and based.
Why should you be allowed to vote if you don't actually want whats best for your community?
Why should you be allowed to speak if there's an inherent duplicity to any constructive rhetoric you might have?
(Especially) Why should you be allowed to own weapons if you inherently desire to inflict harm on others?
The only real counter to this I can think of is that the current government absolutely cannot be trusted to carry out such a task without mostly going after harmless innocent people.
Otherwise, in a just world: "Introverts suck" is state policy.
No. 2239293
>>2238830>>2239151>>2238844Med professionals treating eachother like shit seems to be a common workplace complaint. Related story, I talked to a paramedic once who said that (in my country at least) people in his field were
technically allowed to use hospital amenities, but the doctors and nurses always got uppity about it so nobody ever bothered. That just seems crazy to me considering what paramedics actually have to deal with on a consistent basis.
No. 2239377
>>2239274Tyler's new music is so horrible it frankly undoes any "growth" he's had as a person. And he hasn't changed anyway, he adapted. The edgy Tyler was just him doing what he wanted, gay fantano watching twitter tramny approved Tyler is a by-the-numbers fraud.
He just went from being a controversial trend setter to a safe playing trend follower.
No. 2239465
>>2239247It’s called democracy, even people who you don’t like have the right to vote.
And I’m saying this as a moderate leftist. As much as I would life people from the far right to lose the right to vote, you can’t pick and choose.
No. 2239765
File: 1730767422322.jpg (143.09 KB, 928x1232, 8326895267005.JPG)
Clerith is infinitely better than Cloti and female Tifa fans are all pick-mes.
No. 2239809
>>2239761So true anon it's a very endearing show.
>>2239765I don't know anything about final fantasy but you're right.
No. 2240043
File: 1730784317186.gif (256.73 KB, 400x300, rapture me jesus.gif)
>>2232583>>2232571Late but why can't we have both? There are many parallels between American Dad and the Bible
No. 2240170
File: 1730793890993.png (62.14 KB, 900x386, aYLELgu.png)
he's right
No. 2240289
>>2240278bpd isn't real. males have brainwashed you to see their rape
victims as manipulative psychopaths.
No. 2240304
File: 1730809391343.jpg (58.54 KB, 749x711, 1000018844.jpg)
>>2240299NTA but I was going to say. It's obnoxious when scrotes like to armchair diagnose random women or girlfriends with BPD as a way to smear them with blame. But at the same time, I've seen both moids and women with fucked up personalities so genuine that I did see the patterns of the BPD symptoms list. In short, I believe scrotes deliberately abuse the term "BPD", but I do believe it's a real thing. Just like with ADHD.
No. 2240317
File: 1730810138441.png (29.55 KB, 275x270, 1671504302112.png)
>>2240310no offense, but did you read anything I just said? I said that I believe BPD is real, just that scrotes like to abuse the term to make their ex-girlfriends always look like the villains. You faggots really need to learn how to fucking read, man. You argue like a bippie I know, can't listen for shit and never know what the fuck you're talking about at all.
No. 2240321
>>2240308You said
>Criticizing the inherent unbalanced nature of heterosexual relationships isn’t the same as a bunch of retarded trannies thinking their identity makes them “queer rights” or whatever the fuck queer means.in response to my post where I said
>we really did see a massive troon spike after the whole 2010s "UR EBIL IF UR HET" side of internet culture took root.Where I was obviously talking about sjw internet circles during that time period (tumblr and shit), who were not having nuanced discussion about the harms of heterosexuality. They were primarily shaming teenage girls for not being "qweer" enough. Tranny shit took off shortly after this, probably because those same girls couldn't meme themselves into being bi.
No. 2240331
File: 1730810663150.jpeg (54.13 KB, 563x1030, IMG_2973.jpeg)
>>2240317People on here have chronic reading and comprehension difficulties. Even when you fully understood what they said and are even able to go the extra mile to read inbetween the lines they always say “you didn’t understand what I meant!” which is just codeword for “you didn’t agree with me all the way so I will pretend to be retarded to discredit you!” It’s like nobody reads anymore and when you actually can draw conclusions (something taught in elementary and middle school) from someone’s perspective they act like you’re the retarded one. These are the women seeking degrees and joining academia which frightens me with the amount of stupid women being encouraged to do so and it’s probably to silence the ones who actually know how to apply the basic knowledge they’ve learned and turned it into something greater which is just plain common sense. Being autistic and rote memorizing a bunch of useless slop about monkeys or computers says nothing about actual valuable intelligence, if they can’t apply it and actually use the information they learned then they are a done deal. I’m not saying stupid women will ever be on the same level of stupid men but holy shit…. I can’t take this anymore kek I’m sperging
No. 2240344
>>2240313exactly.
>>2240329yet they’ll stand by a rapist with multiple
victims. it’s interesting.
No. 2240362
File: 1730812366561.webp (25.72 KB, 537x348, boxkitty.jpg)
>>2240357Aww, this is so cute. My unpopular opinion is that cats are a liquid.
No. 2240447
>>2240431AYRT And yeah, that is often true but it doesn't mean the label itself is completely useless/some kind of moid psyop. Sometimes it's used against people but sometimes people really are just like that. Basically, I agree with what
>>2240381 said
No. 2240637
>>2240331i believe the current state of higher education is designed to brainwash susceptible young women, elevate stupid women while destroying critical thinking skills, and leave women with a large amounts of debt they have difficulty paying off. a woman who is exhausted by her struggles and easily conditioned into believing whatever moids want is an ideal
victim for them to exploit
No. 2241426
Holy shit I'm so fucking sick of all the moralfagging around 2D characters here, I mean the site was already pretty moralfaggy but the ugly male psyop thread was the final nail on the coffin. You can't go anywhere in the off-topic boards without having the mood ruined by newfags that think women being held to insane beauty standards while getting chained to real life misogynistic moids that look like toads means they get to shit on any woman that doesn't share her taste. They give you shit just for thinking a handsome guy with some stubble is attractive, yeah I'm sure that's the result of patriarchal brainwashing and you're super oppressed by that hornypost. Thanks for derailing the thread and stopping that evil agent of patriarchy!! These posters are taking true criticism of beauty standards and double standards and taking it to an unrealistic extreme. They don't even have a clear definition of what is part of the psyop other than "anything I don't like". To these clowns, EVERYTHING is part of a psyop, so no fun allowed, guys.
Like none of those characters are even remotely realistic to begin with, they're 100000000000 times more attractive in both looks and personality than the average 3DPD scrote and you have the audacity to say that ackchully it's part of a psyop to brainwash you into worshipping irl hideous males just because the fictional man has a bit of facial hair or muscles or some other trait you dislike?
What the fuck is wrong with you? Go be the fun police somewhere else. Nobody even collectively shat on bishies, maybe you're just mad because some anons said your husbando has a poor and cluttered design or someone said she doesn't get the popularity, but nobody was persecuting you here for your taste in anime twinks except for the schizos that call everyone a pedo. You should have the mental capacity to tell those people apart from the ones that just like 2D """"roidpigs""" and aren't judging anyone, but since you don't maybe that means you're too young to be here? It would explain why you take the UMPO logic to such ridiculous extremes because younger people are more prone to using retarded black and white logic.
It reeks of having been bullied in middle school for liking anime bishies and now having a powertrip to dogpile women with taste that differs from yours, with the excuse that you're actually doing it for the good of womankind, fucking mental insanity. Aren't there more pressing matters IRL than what specific flavor of cartoon man body type is more morally right to like you fucking hypocrite?
I'm so fucking sick of these newfags man.. Like, I don't hate radical feminism or those who make fun of ugly seething men irl, why do they have to ruin things for everyone else on this site? And I'm posting this here because it is now an unpopular opinion on lolcow. We need to bully these newfags more for their retardation
No. 2241460
>>2241426I agree the thread has deevolved into nlog nigel yume wars which is hilarious because in the same breath they say moids are shit while praising some teen moid for his "pre wall" looks
which is just before they actually reach adulthood kekkkk so that should tell you what kind of posters these are I would recommend not caring what they say and keep enjoying what you like
No. 2241494
File: 1730846651113.jpg (75.85 KB, 392x500, 1000000215.jpg)
>>2241453Made it more accessible my momma said I'm not allowed to say that word
No. 2241540
>>2241523yeah it sucks ass, everyone's acting like the world is gonna end, no joke I had people tell me seriously in despair if the wrong party wins the world is gonna end because of (bullshit), from both sides of the aisle. I never see this energy for local political activism and I hate how news only broadcasts america's shit and keeps having predictions, when we have a huge political scandal/tragedy going on.
I hate how normalized americaboos are.
No. 2241602
>>2241572I mean, you're talking in hypotheticals. Your cute dream bf probably doesn't exist and probably has watched porn his entire life.
>who abuses her kids and does meth.What the fuck does that have to do with being ugly? Plenty of attractive women do drugs and abuse their kids.
No. 2241628
File: 1730849524207.jpeg (207.65 KB, 1284x434, IMG_4506.jpeg)
>>2241621Being fat is actually associated with having a low iq btw. Which makes sense because it takes someone pretty dumb to not know how to lose weight.
No. 2241708
File: 1730851536347.jpeg (1.37 MB, 1284x1724, IMG_4507.jpeg)
>>2241691I wouldn’t say they’re assholes but ugly white trash/ghetto people have a look to them. Most of the time they don’t even know the stuff they do is morally wrong because they’re dumb.
No. 2241746
>>2241725It's okay not to be pretty.
>>2241736Oh yeah of course this counts as a health treatment, I was mostly thinking about the anti aging staying youthful looking uwu shit.