File: 1724076576276.jpg (9.97 KB, 389x391, 1644517500478.jpg)
No. 2143492
>>2143486You're so right. But still I cannot recall a time where moderation had such soft sensibilities. It's almost like they contribute to threads and ban anons they think are kind of annoying. I remember a time where you could actually appeal a ban you had if it was retarded. Now you constantly get the "take it to /meta/" or the don't appeal the ban because they're just annoyed with you.
Now that people are responding to this thread watch it get locked in a few minutes.
No. 2143498
>>2143487fuck the mods and fuck their bootlickers too, it amazes me how much defenders and whiteknights they have when these mods are miserable randos who we don’t even know are genuinely women, they could be a bunch of moids borrowed from kiwi or their uber secret discord nobody here is allowed on again showing how elitist they are when this website leaned in nobody’s favor kek. i honestly couldn’t stand one of the mods or admin for that discord, she was always bragging about her fugly fiance lacking self-awareness that it’s two self-owns if you’re modding a discord
and marrying a sasquatch
>>2143492someone else said this before, they create certain threads and are very quick to ban you if you say something that goes against the thread rules they created. it’s definitely getting locked, just saw a screencap in the caps thread where one of the anons told them they’re a gay retard and got banned (muh unsaged)
No. 2143522
>>2143520NTAYRT but
>no janny reads meta This isn’t true? Whenever I take concerns to /meta/ or complain about baiting it usually gets dealt with?
No. 2143527
File: 1724078998016.png (97.71 KB, 1826x846, i22.png)
i had this thought recently. i've considered "taking it to /meta/" several times, but whenever i go in there, i lurk a bit and notice how nothing is resolved and nothing seems to matter when it's posted in there.
i've reported multiple instances of racebait and alogging that never got banned, especially recently. but yet i'll see shit like picrel which is very clearly a very insecure janny trying to use bans just to argue with anons they disagree with. there will be some really stupid and petty bans handed out, meanwhile i see several cases of alogging go unbanned and racebait stay up for hours. i'm fine with rules and board-etiquette but more and more it feels inconsisent, and like it just matters on the jannys mood more than anything
>>2143515agreed. i lurk /meta/ regularly, it's just people yelling into the void. i've never even been banned, i'm just surprised that "take it to /meta/" is even a ban to give out, considering taking it to meta does nothing as far as i'm concerned
No. 2143541
>>2143530They don’t understand this is a thing that’s made when the previous thread
isn’t working. God we fucking know already there’s one in /meta/ if you can’t read this was created because people are fed up and to get attention. The people on this website are just so fucking retarded and eager to defend the farmhands with no foresight or intelligence
No. 2143575
This thread was made by an anon having an autistic shitfit about her ban and rageposting about it in several threads on /ot/ and /meta/, as well as by abusing the reports system. She has also samefagged and doubleposted prolifically in this thread (almost half the posts are her). As this thread is primarily the result of one ban evading retard's personal vendetta, we are locking it, although we acknowledge there were other users genuinely posting in here as well.
If you want to vent about moderation, site culture, or anything else relating to the site itself, it should be done on /meta/. There is also the Retarded Bans Thread here on /ot/ for venting specifically about bans:
>>>/ot/1905883If you feel like you have been banned unfairly, please have more patience as you wait for the appeal to go through before going off the deep end.