/pt/ - lolcow general

http://thatincelblogger.wordpress.com/

If he comes back, we could make him his own thread right away so he doesn't shit up this one.

https://encyclopediadramatica.es/index.php?title=Marjan_Siklic&curid=243375&diff=598522&oldid=586138

http://www.coalpha.org/

This whole site.

Do we REALLY want Marjan's disgusting, sick, useless ass back here? NO. He'd get banned the instant he goes on about his rape plans anyway.

>>1617
Depends on the language he uses.

>>1617
What "rape plans"? What are you rambling about? When did I ever mention any plans for raping anybody?

As for useless, if by useless you mean not willing to finance sluts who everybody in the world with sufficient levels of immorality and stupidity could fill up like Christmas turkey then yes, I am useless.

>>1178
Any society in which seduction is used to get women is already gone. Seduction is a cancer and an equivalent to Fisherian runaway. It destroys the species. We can observe this process right on this thread.

goddamnit you faggots now we have to deal with him blathering on and ruining this thread

>>1630
You could just ignore me, so I'll have nothing to reply to. However, that would require the kind of discipline and sanity somebody whose father was an unknown thug and mother the slut he picked up that day is unable to have.

Oh god damnit
This is why I didn't link to his blog

>>1633
Told you. Anyway, I spoke to that journalist (for two days even) so if somebody has any questions for me, hopefully serious ones, I could reply.

>>1636

All you're going to achieve by posting here is creeping people out. Nobody wants to hear your whiny "co-alpha" shit anymore. It stopped being funny after everyone realized how screwed up you are.

>>1641
Oh, yes, like I predicted, there won't be a lack of omega and slut offspring.

Tell me, little girl, in whose name are you saying this, considering you used plural?

But, yes, it definitely isn't funny. If you're looking for fun I am not the infamous character you should be interested.

>>1629
Go on…
What are your thoughts on Elliott Rodger?

>>1643
I cannot feel much sympathy for him. I obviously understand his pain and I, unlike 99.9 percent of people, understand he died due to incel, not some mental illness, but I don't feel all that sorry since he had all that money and didn't remember to try abroad. Hell, he could have at least tried Mexico.

Instead he clung to one of the most difficult areas when it comes to women in the world (probably only comparable to Sydney, Australia), where his money meant nothing and where he completely lacked the sufficient level of immorality and stupidity (which is what game actually is).

I am three years older than him, much poorer than him and still survived up to now so yeah… I can understand him but I don't feel sorry for him. At 22 he should have know better then to want some of the pickiest women alive.

You forgot The Red Pill on Reddit. It's a huge subreddit filled this type of cringy fedora wearing angry misogynists.

>>1642

I don't care that much, myself. It's just kinda TL;DR, but after staminarose went down I remember seeing posts on unichan about how at least we don't have to put up with your creepy bullshit on lolcow.

But here you are. Oh, joy.

>>1645
Define "immoral"

>>1636
Will they publish the article about you?
If yes, local newspaper or internet article?

>>1645

If any newcomers that want to know who this poster is; He's a Eastern European non-virgin incel that considers his iwb mother a murderer for not sleeping with him. He also wants his government to spend millions of Euros on government prostitutes. That's all you need to know.

>>1697
Iwb?

>>1670
You don't have to "put up with my creepy ass". Just avoid this thread and don't reply.

>>1673
Any dictionary definition would do. The real question is about what constitutes immorality in a specific act.

>>1676
Der Spiegel is hardly a local newspaper. The guy told me it'll be online as well. However, it will obviously be in German.

>>1697
You're an idiot.

1. The country most of you usually claim I'm from isn't in Eastern Europe at all.

2. The program I had an idea for a)wasn't about any govt prostitutes b) had been abandoned since Oct 2013 (there's even a blog post about it from that time).

>>1670
As a Unichanner: be glad he's a namefag so you can at least mentally filter out his posts. Our creepy, unbearable fucks always post as anon.

>>1714
It's nice you call me creepy, dear. But you'd never call creepy millions of people who think incels should just live with a lack of most important single factor for happiness in life and shut up, as if it is an ingrown toenail.

>>1715
If you want love so bad then get out and find it

>>1705
What does "iwb" mean? I googled it but can't find anything to pinpoint what it might be.

>>1721
In fact, I have stopped looking for love in Dec 2013. You know why? Because I realized that if I keep trying to find a woman I'm more likely to end up in prison, mental hospital or just regular hospital then even kissing a girl. KISSING. A. GIRL. Not to mention anything else.

>>1713
>Any dictionary definition would do. The real question is about what constitutes immorality in a specific act.

I was interested in your personal definition.
Sounds like you don't even know what it means or you would have given me a real answer.

Are internet "atheists" allowed in this thread. If so, I found a live one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRz_zW1VYMI

I don't know who's the genius that linked Marjan's blog here, but to anyone new here - there is no point in arguing him.

He will keep to his own world views and the whole argument will just turn into name-calling.

>>1734
I don't have a personal definition. Any dictionary definition would do. They mean the same thing.

>>1737
Person asking the question above- this is immorality. Using somebody's name given by trolls that isn't even a real name, which you'll find out real soon.

And, yes, of course it is unlikely I will change my world view or that you will change yours, for that matter. Is that the sole goal of any conversation?

>>1743
Just humour me. Define "immoral" in 2-3 sentences.

>>1746
Somebody doing things that are evil, wicked and wrong. State of being those things. Somebody lacking most or all of the traits that are seen as moral.

What is the point of this? Why do you cling to a definition that much? What does it matter? How do you define a dog or a cat?

>>1750
Whoa, that's pretty fucking creepy. It reminds me of Siren. So, what's up with that woman's face and why is it in this thread?

>>1754
That's my photo I gave to Der Spiegel.

>>1748
Just wanted some insight

>>1758
It's pretty cool. Having said that, I know nothing about photography.

>>1750
Why post this here?

>He's back.
Jesus, guys. Why do you do this.

>>1748
Pretending to be disabled while you're really not in order to collect disability, calling each and every woman ever a whore (meaning it literally), and begging your mommy to fuck you does not seem either evil, wicked or wrong to you at all, then. Ok…

>>1885
"Pretending to be disabled while you're really not in order to collect disability"

I am not doing that and not collecting disability. I am doing something else.

"calling each and every woman ever a whore (meaning it literally)"

By whore you likely mean slut. No, I don't think every woman is a slut but that's irrelevant, really - every woman is conditioned to be attracted to horrible men due to reasons I will explain in an upcoming article.

As for "begging mommy". the context of this is well explained. For example, check the infamous Darkness article which outlines the situation I was in at the time.

In short - yawn.

Croatian girl here.

Why did you follow us here? Why even talk to us feminist sluts?

>>1922
He's just an attention whore like every cow we post here. It's funny, he's so desperate that if people stop responding hell reply to shit that's totally unrelated to him and call that person a whore. He also likes to brag about disability and how hell never pay for welfare sluts even though he's the exact same as the sluts who are already scamming the system.

>>1907
Lol this contradicts everything we saw on staminarose. He's just an attention slut

>>1922
Are you that slut who expressed interest but then backed off when she saw I wasn't popular enough?

I follow the referrals on my bloh and don't know who I'm talking to.

>>1942
This is nonsense. If nobody talked about me I wouldn't reply here. I don't care about a bunch of fedora wearing idiots I despise almost as much as feminists/liberals. I wish there was a way to test this.

Anyway, jesus

>>1942
>>1943
I AM NOT ON DISABILITY. I am on unemployment benefits.

And no, I am not the same as a welfare slut for one crucial reason - a welfare slut doesn't wanna work despite having relationships and sex. If I had relationships and sex I'd work.

However, due to intertwined facts that

1. working wouldn't increase my chances of finding a partner.

2. me working would mean I'd finance the exact reasons why women reject me

the idea of me finding a job is ludicrous.

>>1943
What does it contradict? Which statements?

>>1945
>wasn't popular enough

It's not like you threatened her with physical violence or anything… Oh wait

>>1945
>find girl on the internet willing to have sex with you
>call her a slut and threaten her until she no longer wants to have sex with you

I don't think you really want to get laid. You self sabotage yourself cuz you're addicted to misery and you would have nothing left to moan about. You don't want to lose the only (stupid) excuse you have for why your life is so pathetic.

Look who's shitting up the "nice guys" thread again.

next time link his blog in a pastebin or something

>>1945
I've never run into someone who's willing to sabotage his own quality of life such as yourself, my god, you are a winner.

>>1959
Well, of course. Why else would he want to remain on government funded retard checks?

>>1959
>>1960
Of course, these posts are written by psychopaths. 1960 also adds a silly insult.

I mean, the basic thing you don't understand is that there is no "quality of life" for a normal person who is incel.

Your only goal is to get rid of incel. You don't even take that into any consideration.

And then you say that relationships and sex aren't everything in life. I agree. But they're also not nothing as you think they should be. If a person doesn't have that part of life settled they're in trouble.

Also, did it ever occur to you that my quality of life might also be significantly impacted by my knowledge that I am virtually PAYING DUMB WOMEN TO REJECT ME?

And all of these crazy talk I hear is because you are demented fools. This is what I mean when I say that only losers can reproduce in this society. The only ones who reproduce are moron jocks and sluts everybody gets to fuck.


Regarding the whore you're defending here - LOL ! I will make a post about her later. You're incredibly naive.

>>1971
What do you talk about on dates?

>Do you call the girl a slut or a whore? (If so why? What, in your mind, makes it ok to insult a women who actually wanted to give you a chance?)
>Do you talk about yourself constantly?
>Do you talk about/ask for sex on a first date?
>what sort of conversations do you have?
>ever threaten a girl while on a date with her? (Even in a "joking" way)

>>1974
Irrelevant. The reason why I was unsuccessful on dates has nothing to do with what I talk about. The reason why I was unsuccessful on dates has nothing to do with that.

Bear in mind, I am not doing anything mentioned here that would be considered bad and I agree that some of what you mention here could make a girl reject you but that is not the problem in my case.

My problem is much deeper. It has nothing to do with what I talk about on dates. This is what my next big article will be about.

I am unable to have any success with any woman for reasons that are much more complicated. Basically, the sole idea that I could have any success on a date is ridiculous. That's why I stopped trying.

Like I said, I'll explain why real soon.

>>1975
I just want some insight. I'm not asking for your long winded opinions, I'd just like to know exactly how your dates go. I'm really just asking out of curiosity because I'd love to see how you act irl.

>>1975
In fact, could you make a YouTube video?
Just one. I really want to see your body language, your tone of voice when you talk about these sort of things, etc.
Or do you have a YouTube channel already? I don't know if that's something your interested in.

>>1977
>>1978
I can understand perfectly why you're more interested in seeing how I behave IRL than reading my opinions.

The thing is, these opinions you're not interested aren't some bullshit about looks/status/experience etc. They're an extremely detailed explanation of why my type of man cannot be attractive. As strange as it may sound, it is much more valuable than seeing me irl.

You see, I can understand you. You're basically interested in approximating my potential seduction skills (even if you yourself maybe wouldn't put it that way) and that's ok. But I argue that 1. my type is completely unable to use seduction 2.seduction should not even be used in terms of getting a partner.

I might do a video one day but what that essay will say is much more important.

>>1978
*not interested in

>>1991
what are these seduction skills you speak of? What can other men do to attract women that you can't? Is it complimenting a girl or is it hum bragging about athletic skills? I don't get it.

>>1990
>potential seduction skills

lol no. I just have a feeling there is something about how you talk to people that you currently don't understand is the problem. You might see it if you recorded yourself and watched the video. And it would be really interesting for me to see that video. If you're really as moral as you say you are it would come across irl/in videos.

Make him.his own thread u tards. Or make this his thread and make a new sperglord thread. Its not that hard. Mod can remove any posts he makes outside his designated thread. Bitching wont get you nowhere.

Know how pt is our queen? Can we make this guy our king? One autist to rule them all. All mighty king of spergs.

>>1945
See what I mean? I'm not even talking to him but he can't resist responding, just like the cows and other sky's we post here.

>thinking that gurl will contact you ever after threatening physical violence
You dumb

>>1945
Tldr;
Attention whoring welfare slut level Dana (but less successful and not as charming)

>>1977
He won't ever answer coherently cuz he's nuts, it's no use asking. He did this on STAM rose too.

>>2015
Nah, this guy gets boring fast. PT always delivers but this guts viewing us just lame. Hr first even have high who moments like PR. He's just a fucking nutter. If you research him you'll find it also gets pretty criminal.

>>1977
Wanting a coherent answer from him is like trying to stop the tide. He doesn't want advice but only wants to wallow in his own self-pity because to him it gives him a high. Remember that he's one of those guys that thinks that any woman that isn't attracted to him is a slut–including virginal ones. You know, typical "nice guy" logic.

Someone make this guy his own thread so he can stop shitting up this one. It'll be easy to hide his inane ramblings that way as well.

Can't wait til he goes Elliot Rodger mode. Then afterwards the police might start taking Interpol reports more seriously.

>>2057
test

>>2041
>>2041
I read the first two sentences and laughed (while, of course, not reading anything else).

You will, I am sure of it, not back up your claim that I can't make a coherent answer.

What's worse is that this person DIDN'T EVEN WANT AN ANSWER AND YOU DIDN'T EVEN MANAGE TO UNDERSTAND THAT.

All they wanted is to see me on a video. THAT IS ALL THEY WANTED. Not some answer, you imbecile.

As for advice, you serious? Advice? ADVICE?! You are completely retarded. Have you read the Darkness article? You think somebody in my situation wants "advice"?

It's almost as if you're almost certainly a retarded whore who every trucker, every moron, every jock, every loser in the world can fill up like Christmas turkey whenever they feel like it irl.

>>2038
Insult, backed zo by thin air. Do you know how many morons called me “nuts“, just to show they can't follow a basic argument later or that they're dangerous stalkers? The sole fact you're making these insults says everything about you.

So I will repeat

It's almost as if you're almost certainly a retarded whore who every trucker, every moron, every jock, every loser in the world can fill up like Christmas turkey whenever they feel like it irl.

>>2057
Interpol will never take a bunch of ridiculous femifascist whores trying to stifle those who express opinions they don't like.
What's even worse about this is that you're openly expressing a desire that some people are to be killed (ok, admittedly probably morons like you) just cause you hope it will make calling out sluts who can get fucked by ANYBODY, EVERY TRUCKER, EVERY MORON, EVERYBODY

Take 3

It's almost as if you're almost certainly a retarded whore who every trucker, every moron, every jock, every loser in the world can fill up like Christmas turkey whenever they feel like it irl.

>>1993
Well, it's like this.

First, your definition of seduction is too narrow. Seduction is much more than what you believe it is. The sound of my voice or my mannerisms being important for getting women is definitely seduction.

But my points are that

1. No sane societies cares about these things.

2. Ones that care about this are those where immorality and stupidity are the most important for getting women.

Yes, there is definitely a problem with my voice. While it's nowhere near nerdish it sounds too soft for today's women, it's a voice of educated person, and modern women, who go after retarded thugs, hate that.

But there were women who didn't mind and still abandoned me when I failed to prove my immorality and stupidity so voice or mannerism by themselves aren't the main problem. My lack of immorality and stupidity are.

But there

>>2067
*sane societies care

>>2036
All of the posts I replied to related to me. If you think I won't reply to post that don't address me directly you're even more retarded than I thought.

As for that fucking whore…

Jesus fuck.

This is what happened…

1. Some retarded whore makes a hilarious post on how life is often tough, how she understand I've been through pain etc.

2. I ask her if she'll fuck me.

3. She asks me something about that.

4. I reply and give her my e-mail.

5. She doesn't contact me for weeks.

6. I come back and say she didn't contact me.

7. She makes a hilarious claim that she wanted to make a gmail acc but that Google asked her to give her phone number, which she didn't want to give because I MIGHT USE IT. And that's why she couldn't contact me. Because I am Google and gmail is the only email provider in the world. Also claimed to be taking care of her mother.

8. I tell her that's insane and that her attitude is so stupid I'd kick her in the teeth.

9. Idiots here somehow claim she wanted to have sex with me ( she didn't) and that it was me who fucked that up.

Why is that, I wonder?

Could it be that you're a bunch of gynocentric morons who worship women as deities and will always take their side thanks to your indoctrination by a hateful ideology? Damn, that's what it really is.

>>2039
How many thugs have emptied their balls inside you this week?

>>2088
Stop talking. You are not interesting.

>>2091
How many truckers filled you up like you're cows?

>>2091
How many thugs? How many jocks? Your own fathers and brothers filled you up.

EVERYBODY GETS TO FUCK YOU.

>>2091
He will never stop talking as long as you respond to him.

>>2095
Lol he so mad tho.

>>2096
Agreed.

>>2096
I am mad. The reason why I am incel is due to a society that uses seduction. Every society that starts doing that is already dead.

The reason why what post nr. 2095 talks about will never happen is that men who use seduction breed with sluts. Their children have no discipline whatsoever.

>>1992
Seduction skills are everything you do to make a girl like you.

This is not how men and women are paired in sane societies.

In societies which aren't coalpha they are paired with men based on their strength/status (alpha males), ability to provide (betas) and ability to provide plus intelligence/morality (coalphas).

In coalpha societies these three types blend in and men and women are paired through men forming a moral community and women finding such men attractive. Omegas (men who use seduction) are not included in this alliance.

Basically, I am a coalpha, which means that my ancestors didn't have to use seduction. Which is why I suck at it so much.

But all those men who use the term nice guy etc aren't coalphas but betas. Coalpha men are more intelligent than betas and never use such silly terms. You never heard me using the term nice guy. I am talking about immorality and stupidity.

>>2097
Bah, we'll just end up banning him when he doesn't provide amusement anymore and he'll eventually come back claiming to be behind 7 proxies.

And in the end, nobody will care about him anymore and he'll be alone in his thread, spewing nonsense that no one will read. Do we have a way to hide threads here?

>>2104
>Do we have a way to hide threads here?
Don't think so but somebody else suggested it before.

>>2104
Are you an admin here? Who is "we"?

I won't be using any proxies and I will reply as long as somebody 1. asks/replies (to) me 2. talks about me.

As for your idea that I will talk to myself, when did you see me doing that? Another moron whose mother was a whore and father an unknown thug.

>>2106
Nvm, it is the [-] at the left of the thread title.

>>2015
It's frightening how simple modern people are.

I am autistic, despite never been diagnosed with it and despite having traits that are exact opposite because… It is a popular diagnosis in the Anglosphere? There are some internet celebrities with it?

Incredible. All because your mothers are whores who spread their legs to every thug in the world.

Wow it's like /r9k/ personified

>>2104
You can hide threads as explained by >>2108, and you can hide images with the (hide) link.

>Bah, we'll just end up banning him when he doesn't provide amusement anymore and he'll eventually come back claiming to be behind 7 proxies.
Banning undesirables is a slippery slope. At the most I may consider having him keep his threads and posts in /b/. Or maybe just have him keep everything in this one thread.

>>2037
I've explained why I can't be compared to a welfare slut.
>>1945
And no, I am not the same as a welfare slut for one crucial reason - a welfare slut doesn't wanna work despite having relationships and sex. If I had relationships and sex I'd work.

However, due to intertwined facts that

1. working wouldn't increase my chances of finding a partner.

2. me working would mean I'd finance the exact reasons why women reject me

the idea of me finding a job is ludicrous.

I genuinely get a laugh over how when he can't think of a retort, he goes on the insult our imaginary mothers.

>>2122
That's the only thing he is good at, throwing with insults.

>>2122
I can't think of a retort? Which retort can't I think of? I replied to everything here.

Also, another example of gynocentric lunacy - you don't mention what I say about your fathers. Also, none your parents are imaginary.

>>2124
Oh? And what are you good at, anon? Could you tell the readers here about your talents?

>>2125
Seeing as I haven't insulted a single person online ever first without them doing so first or saying something incredibly retarded ( but I'd always explain why it was retarded)

>>2063
Why are jocks and alpha males so loving, kind, and supportive while you inception omega males are so hatefull and cruel?

>>2133
Incel I meant. Danm kindel.

>>2133
I don't even know what you're rambling about. Inception what?

Anyway, you're an idiot. You don't even know what I mean by an alpha male or an omega male. OMEGAS AREN'T INCELS BUT MOST SUCCESSFUL TYPE OF MEN.

Also, these three traits you mention are something that women hate. Thanks to you and your stupidity I will now c/p the part of the upcoming article I already wrote.

A STORY OF YOUR INCEL – THE INCONVENIENT TRUTH



PROLOGUE: I get a lot of messages from women, most of them curious or positive. After reading hundreds of their messages I can think I can safely say I am able to see that I got a message from a young British woman before even knowing anything about her location. Messages which are completely bereft of any capitalization, grammar, sense and sentence structure, while being atrociously written and completely contradictory, immediately reveal a British girl. This is a consequence of a generation of British girls who grew up without fathers. Sure, they have biological fathers, else they wouldn’t exist, but their fathers are the kind of monsters I will be talking about here – But this post isn’t just about such issues – it talks about all kinds of monsters, even extremely well-educated and eloquent ones.

This is the story of your incel. It will describe what made you incel and how you can finally end it. But, much more importantly, it is a story on the future of the human race currently threatened with extermination. This isn’t some potential extermination which has not yet begun – it is an extermination which is already almost over. While it would be too much to say that most people on the planet have already been exterminated this is certainly true in Western countries.

It is a great misconception that being an involuntary celibate means you are somehow defective. In fact, it is the completely opposite – in modern society you pretty much have to be degenerate scum to succeed with women. That notion PUAs and Red Pillers have about alphas is ridiculous – what they’re describing as alphas are not alphas at all but omegas, the worst kind of men, and what they see as omegas are simply betas.

Men who get women in today’s society are the actual losers.

Elliot Rodger was right about many of these things but unfortunately never managed to understand the problem the way I did – had he been given a chance to do so he might still be alive.

What caused this? What happened?

This is a modest proposal me and men of CoAlphaBrotherhood site have - Liberalism and feminism turned women’s preferences from providers to seducers, thus genetically eliminating all decent men through involuntary celibacy.

But before I can get to the crux of our argument let us establish some basic truths that will allow readers to understand our position better.

NECESSARY PRECURSORS

1) All civilized societies were patriarchies.

2) Women are agnostic about male behavior. This means they’re not naturally attracted to any type of man but that their preferences change depending on which kind of men is the most successful with women.

3) In connection to nr.2, women’s preference for a type of male changes simply based on a degree of success a type has with most women.

4) Seduction is worthless, even harmful for most species, as it does not promote any valuable traits that make the species better. It is a form of deceit males make do spread their genes and it creates worthless offspring. This is explained by a phenomenon called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway

5) I believe voting is a privilege that should only be given to intelligent men and shouldn’t be given to women.

FOUR TYPES OF MALES

There are basically four types of males or male mating strategies in the world.

ALPHA MALES

General description: These are dominant, strong men who are usually the leaders. Their intelligence and morality are less important but must have at least average intelligence and are often quite intelligent. Alphas are men like a Fortune 500 CEO, mafia leader like Tony Soprano or statesmen like Vladimir Putin.

Mating strategy: The way these males reproduce is by dominance/high status/strength.

BETA MALES

General description: Weaker than alphas. Not suited for leadership positions. Providers. Their intelligence and morality are less important and while they’re almost always of average to good morality they don’t think about morality much. Their role as a provider requires them to usually have at least average intelligence.

Mating strategy: These men offer their resources for female emotional and sexual fidelity.

OMEGA MALES

General description: Weakest type. They lack the respect of other men, except the most superficial “respect” from fellow idiots so they’re not fit to lead any organization aspiring for success. They are of low morals and often low intelligence. They don’t necessarily have to be stupid, but they are always immoral. However, since stupid omegas won’t care about child support they also won’t care about contraception, which means they will have as many children as they can. This means that being a stupid omega is currently the best type in terms of reproduction.

Mating strategy: These men use seduction. Their lack morals and often poor intelligence means they’re not fit for long-term relationships. Their evolutionary advantage is their immorality. Since they’re despised by all other types and are not in any alliance with them they will not hesitate to seduce other men’s girlfriends and wives.

COALPHA MALES

General description: Weaker than alphas but stronger than betas and omegas. Their possess a high level of intelligence and morality. But the fact that they’re smarter than betas is even a sort a hindrance to them in a modern society, as these men won’t be foolish enough to support a used up slut in her 30s and her child so no women will want them at all (I will explain why later).

Mating strategy: Mating strategies of these men depend on the kind of society they found themselves into, which will be explained very soon. In alpha societies these men are usually in position very similar to betas but if the alpha society hold values like intelligence and morality in relatively high regard they might be more attractive to women due to these qualities. However, their best mating strategy is to form a coalpha group, which assimilates both alphas and betas into a monogamous society where each man has a single wife and excludes omegas.

>>2133
Croatian slut here. He's actually accurate at what happened. I was unreasonably paranoid and worried about my mother but I didn't think I'd get a pile of rage for not promptly contacting him.

He's also correct that I probably wouldn't want to sleep with hum. While he calls our fathers thugs he acts like an uncouth belligerent punk. Threatening violence is nothing but thug behavior.

>>2136
By women I meant modern Western women. Western women in sane periods of time and a part of non-Western women today still respect these traits.

All that modern Western women respect is immorality and stupidity.

>>2142
Again, everything you say is insane.

Your third sentence is nonsense, as your failure to contact me promptly was a failure to contact me forever actually - if you wanted to, you'd e-mail me.

Fourth sentence - more insanity. I never said you probably wouldn't sleep with me. I mean, you surely wouldn't since I lack the necessary popularity and once that is missing all I can rely on is stupidity and immorality, which I lack completely, but that's irrelevant to the point that you're making up shit.

As for threatening violence, that is also nonsense. I just said I'd punch you if I saw you. But since I wouldn't see you anyway, that is not a threat. If we knew each other it would be one.

>>2137
FOUR TYPES OF SOCIETIES

1. ALPHA SOCIETIES

General description: In these societies alphas are allowed to mate guard. This means that they are allowed to have entire harems. This carries a great survival risk, though, as many men would like to take out an alpha and take his possessions. So these societies, the most common ones in history, are never extremely successful. Currently very popular TV series Game of Thrones is a good example (minus the supernatural elements) of how such societies would look like in medieval times. Betas, omegas and coalphas are moderately successful here, depending on how much access to mating alphas allow them, or, in other words, how many women do alphas mate guard. In essence, success of all other three types depends on the scope of mate guarding done by alphas and by how the particular alpha society sees intelligence and morality. In alphas societies which somewhat value providers (in case of betas), or decency, intelligence, morality (in case of coalphas) such men will get some remaining women while omegas will get less remaining women. In societies which are of low morals and intelligence omegas will be more successful than betas and coalphas. These societies aren't feminist societies - providers are still recognized as necessary and are allowed to breed. I will talk about how feminist societies are different in that aspect later on.

Mating success ranking: 1. alphas 2. betas/coalphas/omegas (depending on other traits of the particular society, as explained in the general description)

2. COALPHA SOCIETIES

General description: In these societies male mating strategy is co-alpha, because men in the alliance effectively form a cooperative, collective alpha-male that dominates and guards the females. Hence the name, as these coalphas are effectively working as a single alpha made out of many men. These men can absorb alphas and betas, but alphas have to accept that they are now limited to a single wife. This alliance can benefit betas, since a number of them are excluded or close to exclusion in alpha societies. Omega males are not a part of this alliance and, since women are attracted to a type that is most successful with women, they are seen as utter losers. Yes, the kind of men called alphas today by PUAs and Red Pillers, the kind of many every advice tells you to become are actually seen as utterly worthless losers and pieces of shit in such societies ! Only the dumbest and most immoral women, women stupid enough not to observe their poor evolutionary potential and poor genes, women of such low intelligence that not even the kind of societal rejection they will face when choosing such men will dissuade them. So, in such societies omegas will barely be able spread their genes at all.

These societies have four basic traits

1. monogamy

2. female premarital chastity

3. solid moral religion

4. legal and easily available prostitution.

In such societies every decent man is guaranteed a wife, while prostitutes provide valuable sexual experience before marriage, as well as sexual variety during marriage. The lack of competition for women and the fact that their emotional and sexual needs are satisfied at any time due to everyone having a wife and easy access to prostitutes to fabulous level of cooperation. When it comes to economy competition usually increases the quality and decreases the price. But competition among men for women destroys trust, which makes men stab each other in the back and become scumbags. Also, men are motivated to be good providers and to be successful in all areas since in such societies, because sex is always readily available to them in such society, since they are sure to get married and easily available prostitutes provide sexual variety. There are no frustrated incels distracted from work. Men, who are already selected by women for their intelligence, loyalty and morality, are always sexually satisfied and they don't waste their time struggling among themselves for women.

Most successful societies in history were almost exclusively coalpha. Notable examples include Athens, Rome, England 1500-1800 AD or early America. Ancient Athens was the most productive society per capita in history because women had almost no rights at all and the state subsidized prostitution, which allowed men to turn their minds to become extremely productive, as they turned their minds to arts, craftsmanship, creation of a navy, economy and statesmanship.

Mating success rating: 1. coalphas/alphas and betas integrated into a coalpha society 4. omegas (Btw, a good example of an alpha society turning into a coalpha one was the end of Roman Kingdom and foundation of the Roman Republic around 509 BC, which happened after an alpha Etruscan king raped the wife of a patrician. Roman men took down the kind and established a coalpha Roman Republic)

>>2146
3. OMEGA SOCIETIES

Omega societies are always feminist societies. Only in feminist societies can providers be unimportant to the point that they're now unattractive to women.There are two types of omega societies. A non-feminist omega society and a feminist omega society.

I will first describe a non-feminist omega society, as these societies are older.

3a. UNDEVELOPED OMEGA SOCIETY

General description: Such societies are usually previously existing societies which were feminist. Good example of such society was late Roman Empire. These societies belong in a specific category which should be separated from modern feminist societies. The reason for this is basically that they lacked or currently lack the sufficient development and technology to resemble modern feminist societies in all aspects. Yet, in some other areas they were appallingly similar. Late Roman Empire resembled modern America a lot (just like its rise resembled the rise of Rome).

These societies are feminist and game societies in a structure which doesn't support the kind of feminist policies one can see today. For example, limited forms of democracy never survived in such societies so they never enacted women's suffrage all of them lacked the technology to effectively enforce feminist laws. Also, due to such societies being on a low technological level there were marked differences between cities, especially larger ones, and villages, where sanity still prevailed.



General description: These are feminist societies. These are societies which were once successful and are now in decline. Some of the reasons why they're in decline, paradoxically, have to do with their success. Unlike non-feminist omega societies these societies I will explain how these societies come about later. I will just describe them for now. In such societies there is no longer any real monogamy - things like adultery and no fault divorce are allowed. Just like in omega societies, alphas can no longer mate guard, but this time it is for a different reason - all mate guarding is banned because women have "rights" (which are actually massive privileges). The best that the alpha can do is to have a sequence of wives and have slightly above average number of children. So women today consider alphas somewhat attractive based on this. Betas lose a lot of their value, as women no longer need their resources, unlike in alpha societies (as the state now mostly provides for women) nor they are a member of a coalpha coalition any longer, since it has dissolved (else you wouldn't get an omega society). This means that betas are quite undesirable in their youth but become somewhat desirable again when used up sluts in their 30s want an additional source of income. These sluts use betas as meal tickets to feed them and worthless kids they had with omegas or alphas (much more likely omegas). Coalphas are in a worst position, since they are too smart to allow themselves to be meal tickets, plus their traits like intelligence and morality are hated by modern society and repel women. So, who dominates in these societies? Omegas, of course. Most immoral and dumbest men are now the ones who are most successful in terms of evolution. Stupid omegas are the most successful ones because they, like I said, don't care about contraception or child support.

Mating success rating: 1. omegas (with stupid omegas being more successful than those who are not) 2. alphas 3. betas 4. coalphas

POST OMEGA/POST GAME SOCIETIES - These societies are a natural consequence of omega societies. Since omega societies are completely unsustainable (for one, they allow no incentive and many disincentives for decent men to work) they eventually collapse. These societies



THE CURRENT SITUATION

WHERE ARE WE NOW - PART 1 We are obviously in latter stages of a omega society. The decline has been steep, painful and disastrous

HOW DO OMEGA SOCIETIES COME ABOUT? These societies always appear when liberalism appears. Liberalism is not some new concept in history. It was present in most declining societies. For example, in the Hellenistic Empire, you had philosophical developments like the Stoics whose founder Zeno said unisex clothing should be worn as a way to obliterate unnecessary distinctions between women and men, and the Cynics among whom women and men alike were free to follow their sexual inclinations. It was developments like these that put an end to Greek culture. Liberalism was evident in decline in Roman Empire as well, as the breakdown of its society had to be contained as early as in reign of Augustus. As Roman Empire declined many of the old customs and legal institutions, especially those regarding women, were abolished. But liberal decline happens over a very long time. First decline liberalism causes is that in minds of people. This is what causes them to even think about things like making all men the electorate, let alone making women a part of it. When that happens the rest is soon to follow.

In 1920 USA ratified the Nineteenth Amendment of its Constitution. During the next 40 years observable decay did not start. Then in 1960s there were LBJ's Great Society programs and sexual revolution. During that time the world got its first generation of sluts. No-fault divorce started during that time as well. Not all of the things that happened during this time were harmful. Homophobia and racism were issues that affected the society in a negative way and a fight against them was a noble one. It is a common fact that most things in the world aren't black and white. However, some positive developments couldn't change the fact that irreversible decline began.


(this is where it stops and, as obvious, some parts here are sketchy and need more addition)

>>2146
Also, the difference between me and a jock is similar to a reaction between me and a welfare slut.

Both jocks and welfare sluts aren't incels are do what they do simply because they're scum.

I am frustrated and violent because I have my basic needs unfulfilled due to reasons explained above. That is not the same kind of violence a jock presents. He is violent because he is just like that.
But I'd be crazy not to be violent.
And that in itself is a plus, modern Western women love to be raped and beaten.

I've explained the difference between myself and a welfare slut twice already.

That's why your a thug. Whether genuine or a silly internet threat its something men with low intelligence do.

>>2153
What are you talking about exactly? You mention low intelligence and then ramble about some threat I said didn't exist or something (what?) being genuine.

>>2154
you lack understanding.

>>2155
Yes, I completely lack understanding of something that is ununderstandable.

If you're talking about that whore, you're an imbecile - she didn't contact me for at least 2 weeks during which I didn't write anything to her at all.

And now you try to shame me for mentioning violence when both women here and myself know violence is a great way to attract women. It didn't work here because it couldn't had - nobody will admit it works to a man who is considered undesirable. That's why you try to shame me online, but both me and women here know that modern Western women like to be beaten and raped. The problem is, this knowledge is something like Roman legislative procedures during the early Republic - the plebs can't know.

And, jesus, Croatian slut, you mention yourself not being a slut because you slept with less people than myself. What makes you think men and women should be held to a same standard here?

>>2156
What makes you think they shouldn't? Because of your self serving theology? You will never get famous; you will never be popular; you will never get a woman to love you; you will never be happy; you will never get anyone to think that you're any less than a crack pot.

Here's reality, your theories and definitions will never reach out to anyone that matters. You only have a small and almost unknown presence on the internet. You may think that you're able to shape these "love-shy" communities, but it's really just random sexually frustrated men that will eventually: 1) get a girl; 2) kill themselves; 3) grow up; or 4) remain an unknown loser. But you will ever retain any type of importance.

You will die alone. No one will miss you. You will not have made a single difference.

Hiding this thread because I'm tired of your inability to decipher the simplest questions and arguments. You become perplexed to the point of stroke. You repeat the same nonsense over and over without any real applications and only refer back to your darkness blog post that you call an article. It's like a billion word essay on how you suck. The world is cruel. And you fail to navigate its most essential requirements with self pity, delusions and excuses. It's like your life is a perfect way to describe a flaccid penis.

>>2164
"It's like your life is a perfect way to describe a flaccid penis."

At first I laughed and then I realized how perfect that description is.

>>2164
I stopped reading after the first paragraph. You make no arguments and you insult.

So I'll just comment on the first paragraph

1. Actually, I might get famous and popular since there a huge market for these issues. A good evidence for this is that even my rarely updated blog led by a broken man is the biggest incel blog online.

Imagine if somebody who isn't devastated like I am and wrote like me had a blog?

2. It's hilarious you'd even think that modern Western women can love anybody. That's insane. It's as if you're telling me "you're never get your dog to play chess with you". Well, duh.

Modern Western women are unable to comprehend love and are only tolerated by thugs long enough so they might impregnate them.


This guy understand this well

http://www.happierabroad.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15499

There seems to be a lot of talk here about not having much luck dating and forming relationships with females in the West. Well duh. Western females are just public urinals being used by different dirtbags. The idea that it is possible to form a relationship with them is ridiculous. Similarly, dating is a thing of the past. This is because Western females are all sluts trying to increase their slut status among other sluts. Therefore they want to be f*ed by high status men. It follows that perceived high status men will have sluts constantly throwing themselves at them, so they won't have to date to get sex - they can just take their chosen slut home or to a convenient location to fk right away. Hence it follows that if you are asking for a date with a female then you are not of high status, so as far as the female is concerned you are a loser she wouldn't want to date. The slutification of females has rendered dating obsolete as a cultural construct. The only way to score Western sluts is if you get across the message that your only interest in them is to perform the most degrading sex acts you can think of on them before severing all contact and that you don't really care if they don't want to because you can easily find some other slut who will.

3. There are in fact many, many people who don't see me as a crack pot, including journalists of magazines with a weekly circulation of over a million, as a recent example shows.

So what does all this make you? Of course, a retarded slut who every cretin can empty his balls in at every second of the day.

If you want your posts to be read make them sane.

>>2184
Good thing I haven't read that retard's post then. I can see they continued with insults while a real argument is something they are incapable of understanding.

Maybe if their mother wasn't a slut and their father a thug with mental retardation….

>>2185
Forgot to say.

Who does see me as a crack pot, then?

The usual crowd. Violent, intolerant liberal scum who can't make an argument and defends cretins and their sluts.

>>2185
*understands this well

>>2164
Oh, yeah, forgot the most hilarious part.

If you even have to ask what makes me think of something as basic as the fact that men and women can't be judged in the same way when discussing sexual activity then I am really too shocked to reply.

Go acknowledge yourself with some basic biology and history, for example concepts of sperm and egg creation or the number of successful cultures that had female premarital chastity ( a hint - all of them did).

>>2084
>weeks

You waited less than a day. But you probably don't even understand the passage of time from your bedroom, considering you never leave it.

>>2189
What are you rambling about? Around two weeks passed between me giving her my e-mail and coming on staminarose to say she didn't contact me.

I know you like to lie and everything but jesus, THE WHORE HERSELF SAID I DESCRIBED THE CHRONOLOGY ACCURATELY RIGHT ON THIS THREAD.

I mean, you have to be a bit smarter in your lies.

As for your insults, well, I don't leave my bedroom much, that much is true. Why would I? So I could watch thugs in the streets walking around with sluts?

>>2112
Even /r9k/ didn't accept him. He was laughed off it.

>>2145
>As for threatening violence, that is also nonsense. I just said I'd punch you if I saw you.

Now I'm 100% sure your autistic and retarded

>>2191
I was never there, you lying imbecile.

>>2192
You're retarded, partially due to using medical diagnoses like that. This is not a threat, since I'd never see her anyway. It's sad you're too deluded and brainwashed to understand that.

>>2193

I'm a whore, I love guys that smell nice and take pride in their appearance. I love a big strong fucking sexy thug that can fuck me silly and then gets the fuck out because he has work in the morning. I'm a slut and I love it, I take pride in it.
I will never fuck you. No woman/slut will ever fuck you. The whole world is having fun and you're just an inept loser with no redeeming qualities. You are an embarrassment.
Sex is so so so so amazing.
I don't even feel sorry for you, have fun with your fleshlight (if you can afford one you poor faggot).

:)

>>2228
Why are you telling me this? I know all of this (except the whole world having fun nonsense).

There was this silly woman on my blog who asked why I oppose female premarital chastity or feminism if it could make women approach LS men (which I am not, but she erroneously thought I was and the point is still the same).

Of course, she was an idiot. The problem with sluts is that they only fuck the most popular men (which means most immoral and stupid).

Men in general get more sex in monogamy then in this system where a small number of top men fuck all the women due to nothing but immorality an stupidity (in most cases, there are some alphas too).

>>2228
Yeah, and except the whole no woman will ever fuck me nonsense, since some already have.

>>2244
mhm.

>>2245
>>2245
Are you implying I'm lying?

Cause that would take the wind out lot of out many femifascist monsters who claim I blackmailed and even raped two of these women, while not understanding that it is not only hilariously retarded but that I don't care cause I know women love rape.

Hey Admin-sempai, can I make a request? It's a long shot but:

We've already milked this incelfag dry. Why not move this thread to /b/ and ignore him. Instead we can post about women's right issues:

http://www.npr.org/blogs/goatsandsoda/2014/07/15/331347739/why-a-village-leader-ordered-the-rape-of-a-14-year-old-in-india

I figure this guy gets off lecturing us. There is no one who would sit around listening to his faggotry for long, so he comes here for an audience. We might as well ignore him like real life women.

Anyways, I pretty surprised at this type of retribution style tribal hearings…this doesn't make sense on any level.

>>2253

Some of us like the illusion (RPing) of being raped, by an alpha. Like holy shit this hot, successful, sexy, fucking delicious man wants me so bad he's going to tie my hands up in scarves and ravage me in his bed gets my panties creamed.

But yeah, fuck having some nasty beta trying to do that to me, I'd cut off his balls. And niggers. Fuck niggers.

>>2259
What you see as an alpha is probably an omega.

Read the actual classification in one the posts above.

>>2260
Alpha: successful, intelligent, sexy, dominant.

Omega: You.

If you were in the animal kingdom you'd be constantly mangled, humped, and made to watch/care for the alphas young pups. You'd be the last to eat. You'd never mate.

You are the perfect example of social Darwinism. You can't get da ladies? Can't understand why ladies want alphas? Not willing to better yourself career-wise, socially, and physically? An outcast you will forever be. Alone. Angry. Bitter. Resentful. Spiteful. No girl is attracted to that type of male. That's you.

Guys, he's having a bitch fit on /r9k/. You were right, even they don't like him
http://boards.4chan.org/r9k/thread/12530411/what-does-r9k-think-of-marjan-is-he-a-robot-are

>>2262
I stopped reading after the second sentence. If you want to stick to inaccurate definitions given by retarded PUA sites you can't debate me.

>>2263
A majority of comments there aren't even negative and that idiot wasn't right, since this is the first time I am there and the moron claimed they didn't like me before.

>>2263


Haha this guy has the assburgers. This is natures way of keeping him from producing defective offspring. slut slut slut blah blah thugs blah blah blah ~I don't leave my room~

Yes, girls totally want a guy that is ugly, delusional, out of shape, and never leaves his room.
Yet he thinks an Omega = an intelligent man that used his smarts to get a career and become successful.
OR if a guy knows he's not smart enough will work on his body which is equally hard. Going to the gym every day pushing yourself to the limit so they can be attractive to the opposite/same sex takes huge amounts of willpower and determination.

But he wants a girl to land on his smelly lap because he says so.

el oh fucking el

>>2267
Again, I stopped reading after the first two sentences and you don't understand evolution.

Evolution doesn't provide good or defective offspring per se. Its current state is that it produces defective offspring. You have to be scum and feces for women to be attracted to you. Everybody born after 1990 is feces.

>>2268
You not reading something because it hurts your ego isn't an argument.

>>2268

Your autism is flaring up buddy.

Waaah waahh I wont read what you wrote (we all know you did). You my little spergy friend are the one that doesn't understand evolution. Alphas fuck, Omegas don't. /story

>>2269
I don't read it not because it hurts my ego but because it is useful not to read further when somebody makes an insane statement.
Of course, you're free to defend their statement and I'll try to explain why it is insane.

>>2270
Diagnosing. And diagnosing against the opinions of actual experts who have seen me irl. Stopped reading.

He will never learn, you guys also could go talk to a wall.

>>2273
Learn what, exactly? Learn what? Your imbecilic lies?

>>2260

Why would I read your dribble if you don't read mine?

>>If you were in the animal kingdom you'd be constantly mangled, humped, and made to watch/care for the alphas young pups. You'd be the last to eat. You'd never mate.

You missed that part mate, you're somehow under the illusion that you'd be the alpha dog in the prairie. You can't even make it as a human, and that's easy as shit in a developed country.

inb4 AGAIN, I DID NOT READ WHAT YOU WROTE M'LADY.

>>2275
I wish you wouldn't read my posts. You're wasting your time with me since you're unable to understand them. Which is why I brush you off. You're no match for me, since you're too lazy to even read about the actual 4 types of men and retarded enough to believe I said I am or would want to be an alpha.

>>2274
You're the Beta. You're the Omega. They don't get shit because they're useless. Name one success you've had in your adult life.
Alphas fuck. Alphas walk around with da beautiful ladies.
Are you walking around with a pretty little slut around your arm? No?

BETA BETA BETA BETA BETA BETA.

>>2276

You mean the classification of men you made up? I sure will take you seriously now! You must have a degree! You're totally qualified to turn your opinions into facts! HOW ARE YOU NOT DROWNING IN PUUUSSAAYYY?

inb4 YOU IMBECILE YOU'RE SO STUPID, I DID NOT REAL ANYTHING YOU SAID M'SLUT

>>2278

whoopsie, I meant "I DID NOT READ ANYTHING"

>>2277
Look, again, if you're gonna debate me try to talk like you're not from a nuthouse. I can only be one type. So try again.

>>2278
I didn't make it up. I use it the same way you do, except for the term coalpha (I also didn't make up myself).

The difference is that you don't understand that omegas are the most pathetic males exactly because they use seduction. So what you believe are alphas are actually omegas.

>>"Alphas are men like a Fortune 500 CEO, mafia leader like Tony Soprano or statesmen like Vladimir Putin."

>>Tony Soprano

My fucking sides.

Alphas use seduction, that's how they get da ladies, because they're sexy/intelligent/charming.

>>Omega uses seduction on slut.

>>Slut is immune and things Omega is creepy and gross.

>>2283
ffs I meant to type THINK not things.

~le sigh~

Anyone notice imbecile is his favorite word? This dude is projecting hard.

>>2283
"Alphas use seduction"

No, they don't. If you think guys like Tony Soprano or Putin use seduction you're an idiot. They use their status and strength.

The difference between an alpha and an omega is visible in chimps. An alpha mates with a female whether she wants it or not but an omega has to give her offerings and use the miserable process of seduction. If he is caught doing that he gets beaten up.

Also, you fail to understand that omegas are omegas exactly because they are great at seduction. Told you, forget the PUA nonsense. Their categorization is wrong.

>>2284
I never insulted anybody first unless they did it to me or said something very stupid. I also explain why it is stupid. You are completely unable to do and just use insults.

Hey incel blogger, you still haven't named your one success in life? Do you have a degree? A rewarding career? Banging body?

Inquiring minds want to know.

>>2286
Out of these three things you mentioned I have a degree.

The remaining two are both useless and impossible to achieve for me.

Useless because I'd still be incel (what matter is immorality and stupidity, not a career or a body). As for careers, money can make a difference but only at very high sums you can't make working a regular job and a "banging body" is completely useless - there are many guys on LS.com who have such bodies and are kissless virgins.

These two things are also impossible to achieve for almost any incels cause they require that their relationship situation be somehow settled, they require a "clear head". If one is incel they don't have a clear head and only think about how to escape that.

>>2285

Just like there are high profile men, there are high profile women. Do you think these guys just show up to Scarlett Johansson's house, whip out their dick, and she just gets on her knees and sucks them off? lol no. They use seduction because Miss Johansson is a beast.

>>2290

LS? As in Loveshy.com

LOL. Oh this is delicious.

>>2292
I agree that there are high status women as well but I was talking about male mating strategies. Anyway, do you think such women also aren't attracted to high status alphas have?

In fact, celebrity women are actually more likely to be attracted my an alpha than an omega dirtbag most women are attracted to.

>>2293
Yes, as in that site. Most of whose members are employed and some of who have a lot of money and great bodies. Yet they can't get women. What you claim is wrong.

>>2294

Wat? You completely missed the point buddy. Of course these women are attracted to alphas, but alphas still have to seduce them because these women are surrounded by alphas. Johansson can have any fucking guy she wants. ANY. Alphas have to seduce her, show her that they are intelligent, successful, rich. They'd have to wine and dine her. So yes, Alphas do seduce and it is much more successful than you and your friends pitiful bitter bitching you call seduction.

>>2294
Oh I've been to that site. I did not see one attractive male. The bitterness is off putting.
And hey! I'm on the internet, I'm a lawyer and can't get laid because of those stupid bunnies/sluts :( -said no successful man ever.

You sluts are stupid and shouldn't be allowed to vote along with those imbecile thugs blah blah blah. Your mom is a slut, your dad is a thug blah blah blah. I am involuntarily celibate blah blah, but I get more pussy than alphas because I use ~seduction~ blah blah blah I stopped looking for love because I'm rapey and I might end up in jail or a mental hospital because that's how stable co-alphas are.

muh autism q.q

This guy tried to have sex with his mother, then beat her up when she said no. He ended up in court.

I just… I have no words…

Does anyone have anymore info on this?

>>2309
You may find something at https://encyclopediadramatica.es/Marjan_Siklic

Moved to >>>/b/92.