[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1454733405239.jpg (17.73 KB, 254x253, 1454726514058.jpg)

No. 66529

>Heroin Kids, a clothing line centered around kids addicted to heroin

This confuses and angers me. Should it be banned?

http://www.heroinkids.net/
http://www.kaiserengel.net/en/

No. 66534

Seeing pictures of fully nude women next to pictures of children really rubs me the wrong way for one thing.

No. 66535

>>66534
Agreed. It's pretty nasty and I feel bad for the kids for being featured on there.

Also none of the shit they're selling is cute? At all.

No. 66536

1. this is disgusting and whoever's idea this was is a supremely dumb cunt.

2. those are the most basic bitch clothes ever

No. 66541

This makes me feel grimey just clicking on that. And fuck whoever set the youtube videos to play at the same time. Everything is filthy and why are they allowed to have nude women in gross photos next to children? creeps me the fuck out.

No. 66553

>>66529
>Underwear model's pad is full visible
>Worrying reddish spot on panties in one pic
This is vile. I feel like I need to shower just looking at this shit.

No. 66555

What idiots are buying this shit? I couldn't find a single decent thing in the store, everything looks too tryhard edgy and cheap

No. 66562

the US currently has a HUGE problem with heroin

not sure if that makes this more funny or less

No. 66564

>http://www.heroinkids.net/

No fucking thank you. I need eye bleach after looking through that.

>>66562
Having been addicted to heroin and having lost very good friends to ODing, it just makes me want to throw up. It's so edgy and tryhard.

No. 66565

Wtf is this fucking shit

No. 66569

I don't want to click on that. Can someone tell me if this thing has a cause or not? Is it intended to raise money to help kids fight the addiction or something?

No. 66572

This is fucking disgusting. They're romanticizing drug use like it's some cool, edgy fashion style.

No. 66573

What's really sad is that my ex best friend would be all over this shit. She's trailer trash. I think Meg from the cam thread would probably sport this kind of shit

No. 66585

https://m.facebook.com/notes/corinna-engel/interview-zu-heroin-kids/113471335476078

It's an art project guys. They come of as extremely edgy and predatory in this interview, though. And "gangbang parties are a common occurance in the 7th grade" made me lol. Just a bunch of old people idealizing wasted youth.

No. 66591

>should it be banned
is it harming anyone? no.

gross art project like someone said, probably has some (pretentious) reason behind it.

No. 66597

>>66591
Degeneracy can indirectly hurt others. It creates an atmosphere of degeneracy tolerance. It's part of cultural marxism.

No. 66600

>>66585
>that entire interview
This rustled my jimmies a lot more than I thought it would. Ephebophiles presenting their shitty, edgy project as something artistic and beautiful. Fun excerpts:
>We are living in a world where 13-year-olds have coined the term ‘Komasaufen’ (something along the lines of ‘binge drinking’) and where kids send crass porn clips of themselves, made on their mobiles, around the Internet; where 14-year-olds get their girlfriends sloshed in order to rape her and film it on video. A world where very young girls smile at us from Gucci posters, sticking their tongues between their lips as if to say, “Come on, fuck me.” Every 20-year-old girl is frustrated because she wants to look like that as well.
>In the life that we reflect, the life of these young girls who start taking drugs, you can sense a very aesthetic grace for a short period of time, a grace that is rather remote from life, very rare and strange. A beauty that you don’t even sense even when you possess it. Not a simple beauty, but a tragic beauty, a sickly, nearly hostile beauty, young and naïve, childlike and awkward, wild and free, feral and untended. As with wild flowers – the most beautiful flowers do not grow in gardens or avenues. It is this wild, free, and dangerous kind of beauty that we’d like to capture.
Ruining your life at a young age makes you wild, free and tragically beautiful, guys. :^)

No. 66601

>>66597
Why don't we ban /pol/think too? It's degenerate.

No. 66602

>>66601
Agreed.

No. 66606

File: 1454774261488.jpg (29.77 KB, 325x216, 25d24e1e9683a44bd6ac8695b14f53…)

In hindsight, I think this pisses me off so much because it's exploitative. Not just of the teenagers in the photographs (though that definitely plays a part), but of an entire "aesthetic" formed around a shitty lifestyle (see: 90s heroin chic, the movie Kids, etc). There's nothing in-depth, deep or "beautiful" about these photos. At best, they're as uninspired, haggard and lifeless as the kids themselves. At worst, they're laughably tryhard and have all the aesthetic appeal of a stock image found on Google after searching "teenage drug addiction" (writing "baby sex" on the wall? Fucking really?).
This whole thing was made by boring, uncreative middle-aged/adult people who romanticize youth a little too much and were/are trying to take advantage of trends, but they can't even do that right. It's inauthentic, shock-value garbage and they're using the "Art is there to reflect le society!!! People are offended because we're showing things they can't understand!!! ;)" meme to hide it.
I get what they're trying to do. They're just complete shit at it, and that is the most offensive thing of all to me.
Sorry for blog

No. 66614

>>66569
More like, it makes money at their expenses and treats it like a ~kewl edgy fashium~ whils completely ignoring the problem.
Pure trash.

No. 66616

They're from Berlin. Why am I not surprised?

No. 66617

>>66600
What kind of filthy perverts are these ugh…
Oh yeah, art students.

No. 66657

>>66600
This made me sick to my stomach to read.

No. 66687

>>66585
I fucking hate art students and artists. I'm sure they'd get a rise out of knowing that, though. We live in a world where craftsmanship and talent are no longer appreciated and artists are running out of subversive things to "shock" and do "social experiments" with, so they have to move into underage borderline-softcore porn. Yes, I'm mad.

No. 66693

>>66687
>>66585
If it's an art project, then I actually kind of like the idea behind it. I think it's trying to point out the sickness of the thug culture that's being sold to our children by taking it to the next level. Like, this is what's considered "cool" these days. A lot of the music and clothing that's being marketed to our children propagates this shit, they're just less blunt about it.

No. 66700

>>66693
Lmao no, the interview says otherwise. They honestly think it's "beautiful" for teenagers to be fucked up drug addicts and prostitutes. It's not any sort of call to action.
They're just disgusting predators who are trying to make dosh off struggling youth, and AFAIK they never even give back to them (having shitty photographs taken of you drunk/high/nude does not count, I don't care if you "absolutely wanted it").

No. 66705

>>66693
seriously, it just sounds like an excuse to take amateur pictures of naked women.
Where are all the pics of the men?

No. 66706

>>66705
Men aren't the demographic if they indeed mean to sell, and also don't invoke the same visceral feelings of sympathy assuming it's an art project.

No. 66709

>>66706
the shop has a section for men and women.

No. 66725

>>66700
Well, of course that's what they're going to say if they're trying to get their message across by being provocative. Are you autistic?

No. 66727

>>66706
what the fuck are you talking about? They are have both men and women clothing.

No. 67003

File: 1454834537963.jpg (2.02 MB, 2386x1181, 1453614889932.jpg)

>>66606
I agree 100%

No. 67034

>>66725
If they're doing their job correctly, the photos themselves should be provocative enough without them having to falsify an entire message and talk about how "wild and free" being a drug addicted teenager is.

No. 67061

>>67003
The artists like it when that happens. They consider it to be a "response" to the "art" or whatever. It somehow proves whatever point they're supposedly making.

No. 67168

>>67003
I feel bad for the cleaners that do this. They're just trying to do their job and they probably get shit on for being unable to distinguish arty litter from regular litter.

No. 67186

>>67034
I think that adds to the message, everyone knows about the "wild and free" yolo culture, but this is what that culture is actually promoting under the guise of freedom.

No. 67353

holy shit, part of the german rambling in the background translates to:

>art is like fucking 13-year-old girls


classy

No. 67360

File: 1454880106635.jpg (32.52 KB, 300x456, 41g64mh9RwL._SL500_SX298_BO1,2…)

This is clearly inspired by pic related.

No. 67485

>>67003
I feel really bad for these cleaners! What the hell. This isn't art to begin with,
oh boo, your cookie crumbs got swept away. Maybe because it isn't art? I hate Modern garbage.

No. 67486

>>67353
Jfc, that's repulsive.

No. 67746

so i went to that page and one of the first pics i see is some teen holding a sign up in german that translates to "dieing young is in fashion"
what the fuck



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]