/ot/ - off-topic

You know when you look at an invention and go "yep, that's a job killer"?

Artificial sex and intimacy will wreck some social dynamics for good.

It won't be this awkward uncanny valley crap tho. Serious futurists talk of nanobots connecting to your spinal cord and transmitting sensations from outside implements. So basically Matrix without the fuckhuge spike plugging into your noggin.

I see the great potential for the porn industry. Personally I would be willing to give those white linked devices a try myself, but seriously it would be just like going to town on a dildo–guys get the better end of the deal.

Generally, these devices can only go so far. They can't slap my ass or scratch my back or tug my hair and I don't see that changing anytime soon.

>>65875
As a male I'm deeply uncomfortable with the idea of women using this.

>>65878
As a woman, I'm a little amused that a man is discomforted by the idea of a woman using a sex toy. Seriously, what makes this idea weird for you?

>>65879
I'd want whatever woman I end up marrying to want only me. And I feel insecure at the idea of some virtual man with washboard abs etc. Words can't describe how insecure and nervous the idea makes me feel.

>>65883
Thanks for answering my question seriously. You seem sincere so I'm going to be really really real with you.

First, I acknowledged in my comment that these toys can't yet replace actual sex with a human being (e.g., ass slapping, back scratching, hair pulling, pussy licking) and honestly I don't expect them to even in the future, at least not for women.

Have you watched the OP vid all the way through? The white linked devices I mentioned (while having great potential in the porn industry) can also be used by two people in a loving, monogamus relationship. They could be an actual marital aid for you and your potential future wifey if one of you were to travel for business–I think they'd add a bit more spice to phone sex.

Finally, it's totally cool if you and anyone you enter a relationship with decide that any kind of virtual sex is cheating. Personally I would feel uncomfortable with my boyfriend sexting someone else and this seems similar. That said, it's unrealistic to expect anyone to never be sexually attracted to anyone besides their spouse for the rest of their lives. Someone can still love you and only act out sexual impulses with you and still find their barista hot, etc. I'm concerned you may have unrealistic expectations and it's causing you undue stress.

>>65883
>>65878

You do realize attractive men still fugg anything with a pulse when they're bored, so your goow'fwend already has the option to get boned by one in a one-night stand, right?

This'll sooner benefit men, than women. That or wipe out humanity altogether, but at this point its really hard to care. lel

>>65883
Do you watch porn?

>>65922
It'd never wipe out humanity. There would always be those too broke to afford VR and those willing to sell their sperm to fund their next doll upgrade.

>>65933

Infrastructure dies with productive wage laborers, who both maintain and incentivize it. You can't imagine the squalor of a fully aged society that lost it's primary reproductive mechanism. Single womens' baby fever won't be enough when economy gets tough.

>vr
>expensive

It'll be like a cellphone or a watch before long. At it's core it's less extravagant than smartphone with a touchscreen.

>inb4 we'll just import different people.

Those people are their own future, not your's. Assuming they won't just repeat the cycle.

PS of course humanity won't just get rekt completely, I was hyperbolic. But I can totally see a major demographic decline and civilizational degradation that only turbo conservative communities recover from. That's kind of how the Middle Ages started, among other factors.

>>65890
>Have you watched the OP vid all the way through? The white linked devices I mentioned (while having great potential in the porn industry) can also be used by two people in a loving, monogamus relationship.

the potential application you described is nice, but I really don't like how "digitized" sexuality is now. It is detached from reality and leads to weird, dysfunctional, voyeuristic fantasies.

>pussy licking

I have to be honest, I'm one of those guys who is a bit selfish on this one. I expect girls to go down on me but I don't really like going down on them.

>That said, it's unrealistic to expect anyone to never be sexually attracted to anyone besides their spouse for the rest of their lives. Someone can still love you and only act out sexual impulses with you and still find their barista hot, etc.

I can totally understand this. You're right about that being an unrealistic expectation. I just don't like the idea of women using porn and becoming accustomed to what porn teaches, because it's demeaning to a lot of men, especially all the interracial shit.

>>65923
Why?

>>65965

>because it's demeaning to a lot of men,
>especially all the interracial shit.

I swear this anon's trolling with a robot meme persona.

>>65965
>I just don't like the idea of women using porn and becoming accustomed to what porn teaches, because it's demeaning to a lot of men, especially all the interracial shit.
>because it's demeaning to a lot of men
>I don't like the idea of women using porn because it's demeaning to a lot of men

I don't even know what to say. Just… leave. Leave this place and never come back.

>>65970
The interracial stuff explicitly degrades white men.

>>65972
What the fuck. Why?

>>65978
Not trying to bait you. I feel uncomfortable with the idea of my girlfriend using porn, as do many other men, as do many other girls feel uncomfortable with their boyfriends using porn, as this and other threads have shown.

>>65979
If anyone falls for this shit tier bait from 8chan, they need their head examined. There will be at least one that will fall for it and continue to derail the thread.

Let's find out who that bait swallower will be.

>>65979
Male posters should have a star of david next to their posts. To tell them apart more easily.

>>65965
>Why?
r u srs