>>60066I don't know, I really didn't get the same impression.
>one-sided conversations, interruptingSure, I can agree that this man needs to work on that. But you also have to realize that the interactions in the documentary are edited to show only his talks with troublemakers. He probably has a lot to do on a day to day basis.
>threats??? Are you talking about him "threatening" the counselor to become a camper or leave the camp? The one who smoked, snuck out to buy food all the time, and instead of mediating the drama in her room, partook in it?
>refusing to listen to what the other person saysYes, people who are chronic liars and who other campers have confirmed to be the case when they reported them to the director.
>putting people down and antagonizing themIf they did well, he congratulated them. If they were doing poorly, he let them know that they could do better.
I don't think if the camp and by extension the director running the whole gig weren't encouraging people to better themselves, the campers wouldn't have lost the weight they had and been happy with their progress. I think the director's leadership style was more stern than most and his his weak spots, but I didn't think there was anything rude about it.