File: 1593119801979.jpeg (156.39 KB, 640x480, BAFD81F6-E78B-4C81-999F-D56976…)
No. 575114
>>575106nowadays "sjw" circles rely on being able to know who you're talking to (if they have privilege etc). people who start to feel distrustful and it would just end up as a hub for white liberals, imo.
blogging but it took me a few tries to get past the "un-PC" language and enjoy this stupid website as what it is: a stupid website, same goes for others.
No. 575139
File: 1593121529080.png (1.45 MB, 3640x2140, 1520580022723.png)
Weird thread, but I think SJWs are too obsessed with being recognized to use anonymous platforms. If they did have one, though:
>hundreds of k-pop generals
>kinnies and people who claim to have DID being tripfags, constantly avatarfagging and having more insane drama than 4chan tripfags
>people posting disgusting nudes left and right
>people anonymously posting screenshots of whoever's big in the SJW scene being problematic in group chats to "expose" them
>constant infighting, purity spiralling, suicide baiting, dissection and/or veneration of callout posts, etc
>doxxing generals for anyone who was problematic online
>hyper-PC SJWs using the board to anonymously call women who disagree with them cunts who need to be put in their place, brutally killed, raped, etc with no repercussions
>attention-whoring SJWs faking death/rape threats on themselves and posting their own dox to make themselves seem like victims
>debates on the validity of "age-sliding"
>shipping wars
>fanfic and webcomic generals
>"This celebrity said the n-word. Discuss."
>hot takes like "Lolicon can actually be a medium for trans women to process our second puberty in a fun, playful way. NEVER call a trans woman a pedophile, never never never never"
The board-tan would be some obese/thicc, rainbow-haired polyamorouns pansexual non-binary xe/xem androgynous-presenting individual, xer ambiguosly brown wheelchair bound birlfriend who wears a hijab, and their stunning and brave trans girlfriend with vitiligo.
In spite of boasting diversity, the site's demographics would chiefly be middle or upper class WASPs.
Pic related would be the admin's home, and the site would temporarily go down every time he (she?) had a meltdown. He'd demand donations for running the site, and frequently extort and psychologically abuse his mods. There would be multiple rape and pedophilia allegations against him from "afab" individuals, but he'd have anyone who tried to discuss it permabanned for "creating an unsafe atmosphere for trans posters".
No. 575144
>>575139Could you give me any sites you reccommend? Blogs/imageboards/whatever?
Right now I just cycle through here, Reddit, and Youtube and things feel kinda stale
No. 575151
File: 1593122813569.png (597.16 KB, 586x813, greendalehumanbeing.png)
>>575106board-tan is this, obviously
No. 575152
File: 1593123023850.png (215.86 KB, 600x600, 1582893295739.png)
They need their opinions validated at all times so it must have an updoot system a la PULL
Its inhabitants would look straight out of a SJW picrew, courtesy of the dress up game thread kek
No. 575157
>>575154maybe it's just me but I feel as though summer has introduced more. it's especially obvious re: gender politics: when they use the words "transphobia" or take a cow's non-binary identity seriously using "they/them," etc.
maybe on a a different note, I've also noticed a weird influx of young users that are eager to defend shit like a low age of consent. I feel like I've been seeing that a lot, and since I think that once you're past the age of 21 you realize how retarded and pick-me you were conditioned to be throughout the years wherein your age had a 1 for its first digit, I gotta assume they're teens
No. 575167
>>575152>tomatomagicaOh shit and here I thought that maker was a parody…
>>575154I think it depends on the thread tbh, some of them have obvious twitter and tumblr users with some sjw shit thrown in. Same with /cgl/ refugees.
No. 575195
>>575157It's really weird to see people pop in art related threads to complain about an artist drawing incest or trying to incite ship wars. Everyone can tell you're underage. Everyone on twitter that cares about that sort of thing is underage too. I'd be worried if I saw an adult participating in fanpol behavior.
>>575114I've legit seen some very popular tweets about people calling for twitter to have your full name and a photo of your face so that everyone can be "held accountable" for their tweets. That's totally not creepy at all, and definitely won't be used by someone and/or an organization with bad motives.
No. 575341
>>575202>>575317This thread was supposed to be speculative like
>>575139 (which is gold), though that's my fault when SJWs wouldn't take to the imageboard format in the first place.
>>575256I think it'd be easier to stomach and laugh at ramblings if they were anonymous, twitter is a cesspool I can't stand. Though they wouldn't virtue signal so it wouldn't be the same.
No. 575350
>>575139This kind of sounds like 8chan community and their diaspora.
>people posting disgusting nudes left and rightAnyone who didn't like /v/'s moderator (30 yr old, fat guy) occasionally posted his gay nudes.
>attention-whoring SJWs faking death/rape threats on themselves and posting their own dox to make themselves seem like victimsTwittards in 2014 trying to become the next professional
victim during #GamerGate.
>webcomic generals/v/'s LOL threads
>people anonymously posting screenshots of whoever's big in the ___ scene being __________ in group chats to "expose" themJulay.world
>doxxing generals for anyone who was problematic online /cow/
>constant infightingThey constantly have some bad actor trying to take down their site either through abuse reports to their host or spam attacks, most likely as a direct result of said doxing generals and chat leaks
>"This celebrity said the n-word. Discuss."Mostly to cheer on an e-celeb for being anti-politically-correct
No. 575359
>>575195>It's really weird to see people pop in art related threads to complain about an artist drawing incest or trying to incite ship wars. This happens all over the boards now. Fanpols literally bring their bullshit over here and think it's the scoop of the year that some fanartist did an aged up version of a teenager character or shipped incest or didn't retweet enough BLM content. Who the fuck cares outside of obvious underage k-pop twitter faggots having a vendetta? So many cows do outright illegal things, hurt people in real life or are simply cringey and hilarious. Call them out for that instead, having inconvenient kinks in your fanfics might be nasty but it's stale ass milk, I literally don't give a fuck about some cosplayer doing a "sexy Deku" photoshoot and it's most definitely not "child porn". And someone replying to a minor's tweet isn't grooming. And people aged 19 aren't "minors".
>I've legit seen some very popular tweets about people calling for twitter to have your full name and a photo of your face so that everyone can be "held accountable" for their tweets. That's totally not creepy at all, and definitely won't be used by someone and/or an organization with bad motives.This. They outright demand you to spread out your whole life story in front of everyone to dig through, surprised they don't ask for my credit card number but they might as well because they tag their Ko-Fis to every brain-destroying wokepost they put out to milk for more donations for simply existing and being a pain in the ass.
No. 610678
File: 1598029455960.png (237.73 KB, 824x605, sjwog.png)
Sorry for necroing the thread, but the concept is way too funny to let die.
Left is the original board-tan, right is one of the many redesigns. They can't go 2 hours without making another redesign, every single time claiming it's the superior version.
The reasoning for the changes:
>Baseball caps are dog whistles for MAGA hats, board-tan can't wear those
>Why is she so lightskinned? Why do you hate dark skinned people OP
>Why are fat girls are only allowed to exist when they're sexualized? She should cover more skin
>She looks awfully young too… Her small chest and big eyes are proof that this is literal pedophilia. Mods are pedo apologists for supporting this design
>Her mouth is soooo pornographic. You're exposing underage lurkers to fetish fuel.
>So typical they make a fat girl wear clothes with food on it. Some of us have thyroid issues, stop portraying us as gluttons!
>That jawline is unrealistic for a REAL fat girl. These standards are impossible smh
>Isn't making board-tan exclusively female stifling to people of other gender identities?
>The gay flag but no trans flag is setting off my TERF sensors. Trans women are real women
It'd be anonymous (to make racefaking and lying easier), but there'd be a box of pronouns you're required to click. The equivalent to tripfags is people with the most outlandish custom neopronouns.
No. 625151
>>610678Kek. I can see the board-tan fags constantly making generals for redesigns. Only for (actual) tranny jannies to dump them on their board's equivalent of trash or stealth ban any of the designs they don't like. Leading to the refugees going on discords and trying to dox the jannies while they set up their own offshoot board with THEIR uberspecial board tan. (It goes about as well as you'd think)
>Neopronouns being the equivalent of tripfagsI can see everyone getting their own trip code, with a flag, astrological sign, or sexuality next to it, ala /int/ or /pol/. Oh, and instead of sjw anons telling tripfags to neck themselves or "good. Now I can filter your ass" we get the equivalent of "pl-please don't derail the thread by linking to your kofi/patreon/onlyfans/paypal/twitter/twitch/youtube/blog…" with tranny jannies banning any of the namefags who didn't want to fuck them or made fun of x friend in the past.