File: 1547602771727.png (745.17 KB, 1920x752, crystal cafe.png)
No. 354922
>>354918Damn. I'm sad to have missed that shitshow. I hope many more like it happen.
What a mess.
No. 354941
File: 1547606574146.png (86.13 KB, 428x332, nufufu.PNG)
>immediately full of trannies
anon…how do you even know?
are you that one chick that was replying to every post with "GTFO TROON" a week or so ago? pls get help
No. 354942
>>354941>>354939>>354938ITT butthurt crystal.cafe users.
Not going to wade through the site but you retards had an issue with wildchild on your discord within the 1st week. LMAO.
No. 354950
File: 1547607596231.png (105.13 KB, 456x432, Capture.PNG)
>>354946i actually like calling people scrots kek
or smegsmies
>>354948that's what i said. or was trying to say anyway.
No. 354952
>>354949try posting what you want to see there, maybe? or help me advocate for the banning of pepes & other pol9k iconography
i'm sure a ban on those images would help with the male issue since they love their fucking frogs
No. 354959
>>354953do you make every post on 4chan prefaced with, "well i'm a woman but –"
anyway you seem p childish as you've just resorted to name calling so, bye, have fun with your needless fear mongering
to anyone not silly reading this; it truly is a female imageboard. troll posts are easy to spot, and if you've half a brain you'll ignore or report it if you suspect a man is behind it. good day
No. 354978
>>354918This is not really what happened when it comes to the "mod drama". But I can confirm that one of the mods acted really unprofessional by giving my ip (he was able to guess which posts were mine) to her /r9k/ bf whom I ghosted. Nothing bad happened, but I was really scared when I heard about it.
Also yeah, mods left.
No. 355037
>>355007the worst kind too, the ones who fetishise being a woman and submissive.
skin walking larping creepy dudes who will never be women
No. 355070
>>355062>>355067What the actual fuck is wrong with these people.
Why would you make an ANONYMOUS image board but stalk and document user's posts? Just make a fucking forum you god damn retards.
I'm so fucking tired of seeing all of these failed, shitty chan sites, they all end up in the trash after a couple of years.
No. 355106
>>355091I feel like it's men/troons trying to discredit the site honestly. Half of these people probably don't browse CC with any sort of regularity & purposely only check the few
problematic threads on site.
No. 355108
>>355106I don't know about the events of
>>354918 since CC isn't really as much to my taste as LC is, but I can definitely vouch for the old LC admin and CC admin (not sure if it's still snail) exchanging IP information.
People who used the Lolcow Discord a couple years back also know what I'm talking about with the IP stuff. There was a special link you had to click to be "verified", kek. They stopped doing that a little bit after administration changed hands.
No. 355161
>>354931Honestly what the fuck is wrong with Spoony? She was a thing on /r9k/ and caused trouble there (this was years back) as well as the associated tinychats and Skype groups. She also shit up boards on 8chan.
Everywhere she goes she causes drama, which I just don't understand. She's apparently pretty nice one on one but shitstorms circle her wherever she goes.
No. 355165
>>354918I knew CC was shit but holy jesus what a mess.
also
>trans people being on CC is discussed and multiple users are like "WOW I didn't realise CC was ANTI-LGBT. Transwomen are women. I don't mind transwomen talking in graphic detail about their surgeries!"let that hellsite rot
No. 355167
Lolcow is the cynical "former" (aka not really former) weeb older sister who's salty, sarcastic and bitter. She hates men, women and trannies, and is quick to sperg out over small things.
Secretly, she just wants to be happy, but people have disappointed her too much, so she's turned into an angry person. She acts like she hates anime, video games, K-pop and J-fashion, but can hold endless conversations about those topics.
Crystal Cafe is the more naive, openly weeby little sister who's friendly to everyone. She really wants a boyfriend, and will even accept /r9k/ neckbeards. Likes other women, doesn't 100% hate trannies, and doesn't mind men (but tries to be skeptical of them, because she wants to emulate her older sister).
She's been banned from multiple imageboards for being female or underage, thinks old memes are funny and has an odd interest in religion, especially Catholicism.
The two clash quite a bit, but are still sisters in the end. Both are actually shady as fuck and huge gossips, but Lolcow is a bit more upfront about it.
No. 355171
>>355167just that the weeby little sister is a little brother that's fucked up in the head and decided to change his pronouns.
fuck off and go fucking die with your lame analogy.
No. 355175
>>355102>on top of the fact that the uwu soft baby image (which i have to admit can feel nice and cozy, but is perfect for hawking, fetishistic troons) naturally will attract these men, and ofc, incompetent modsThe soft cute cozy uwu image Crystal Cafe was shilling in the beginning was the first flag, I immediately knew it would be ridden with trannies and tfnogf robots. A lot of us may like cute things, but adult women don't want to be patronized with le pwincess uwu aesthetics on an imageboard.
>>355171this
No. 355178
>>355167lolcow: paranoid chick with a buzzcut that rejects all femininity and men under the guise of feminism, not knowing she's just shoved herself into another box
cc: somewhat naive but still regular chick that lc is jealous of. but cc mostly ignores her in favor of getting better
No. 355181
>>355167wow, this post is embarrassing. as if we didn't have enough reason to stay away from CC, these people being their ambassadors certainly isn't going to warm anyone up to it, i'm sure.
and
>She really wants a boyfriend, and will even accept /r9k/ neckbeards.are you trying to say there's something positive about this? it really sounds like it with the way you've written all this. if youre not male youre an absolute embarrassment.
>>355175tbh i would not mind soft cute stuff on an imageboard, but i don't see any reason to make the ENTIRE identity of the site that. i think ONE board just for that feel would do fine, but troons and gullible women that subscribe to stereotypical bullshit see no problem with it because they live their lives according to caricatures
No. 355186
>>355181I'm not a CC ambassador, just some bored farmer.
>are you trying to say there's something positive about this? No, it's not positive at all. It's pathetic, and I wrote it neutrally. If you read it that way, it sounds like you might be jealous of that shit somehow, which is actually embarrassing, kek.
No. 355187
>>355181I'm not a CC ambassador, just some bored farmer.
>are you trying to say there's something positive about this? No, it's not positive at all. It's pathetic, and I wrote it neutrally. If you read it that way, it sounds like you might be jealous of that shit somehow, which is actually embarrassing, kek.
No. 355197
>>355184then you're just kind of bad at making a point and should read your post again, because it definitely seems like you're chiding us for being 'angry' manhaters, whereas CC needs to be celebrated for being friendly to everyone, 'even r9k' neckbeards, and that CC has the normal and healthy sense of being skeptical of men, that doesn't prevent her from getting a bf, and even lets her enjoy the joys (???) of dating neckbeards, that LC cruelly misses out on because we're just so angery.
>If you read it that way, it sounds like you might be jealous of that shit somehow, which is actually embarrassing, kek.???? are you under the impression that it's difficult, in any way, to get an r9k neckbeard bf? i dont think any amount of insisting your writing didn't sound like it was biased in favor of CC and their bottom of the barrel scrote-sucking (that will probably result in their lives being ruined by their robot neckbeard bfs posting revenge porn, despite their having done everything they could to be nice to neckbeards). your posts kind of make no sense and you sound out of place
also, your 'it's neutral' excuse sounds like BS because you already responded to someone else who criticized your post with:
>I was expecting just this sort of bitter response from a Lolcow anon, kek. CC may be filled with trannies, but it's not a tranny site>not caping super hard for CC>calling farmers "lolcow anon"sk
if you guys are so assmad that we don't like CC, do something about the male and tranny problem, at least, instead of constantly coddling them. and i'd suggest getting rid of that porn board, because a female imageboard is already going to be raided, but it's also going to be way more attractive to men when there's a whole fucking board for porn. why ever leave when they can get off by larping AND literally having their porn delivered to them on the same site?
No. 355201
File: 1547661787207.gif (18.35 KB, 300x100, banner.gif)
>>355199Oh fuck, how could I have let myself be an embarrassment on this very serious forum dedicated to the likes of PT? What a fall from grace. Please forgive me, anon.
No. 355202
File: 1547661848559.png (61.76 KB, 302x104, banner2.png)
>>355201That was the entirely wrong banner, but it still works, lmao.
No. 355204
>>355197See
>>355196It looks like you added something about being mad about people not liking CC, but that doesn't even apply to me. This is sad.
No. 355222
File: 1547664776570.png (433.59 KB, 847x1037, 1539756748935.png)
>>355217Samefag, but this is the OP for their "Pet Thread"…
I'm not a fan of lc mods, but at least this shit would without a doubt get deleted.
No. 355253
>>355250No one ITT but you and
>>355102 have even said "femcels". Are you LARPing entire posts existing now?
That anon actually makes decent points about CC, don't drag them down with autism.
No. 355268
Thanks for creating a thread, OP! I'm the anon who wrote
>>354918 and I've gotten increasingly frustrated with the site and how blatant the male-posting is. I went to the chat in order to bring up that issue but the conversation (when productive) centered mostly around the discord which is bullshit because it's not even part of the site, it draws attention away from an already slow imageboard and it defeats the point of being
anonymous. It never should have existed.
>>354938That's true
but>LC isn't as attractive to trolls/trannies/LARPers because it wasn't advertised as being "for women" as CC has>If there are men here, they know to blend in well and that's fine, I don't notice them and that's how it should be>Male posting here doesn't garner a lot of replies and they're quickly made to feel uncomfortable, male posts on CC are always the most bumped threads meaning men are actually encouraged to post>Admin on CC talks about how she "can't ban someone for sounding like a man" which means that posts about loving men/trannies, trans people asking how to be more feminine, religion, fetishising childbirth/being submissive, homophobia etc. are the most popular because it can't be "proven" that they're menPeople saying "post what you want to see" don't realise that the reason why male posts are bumped so often is because the userbase is majority male/trans. Anyone who doesn't think that is deluded because it's subjected to regular raids from 4chan. "Reporting" doesn't achieve much either because mods are only ban people who have outed themselves as men in their post history. If they don't out themselves, they aren't banned and in fact they regularly tell people off for reporting men anyway so. Even "trolling" mildly isn't a bannable offense unless they can prove it's a man. The aggressive responses to this thread are just a taste of what it's like to post on CC, it's actually unbearable now. Like why do they think coming here to say "Nuh uh,
your site is full of trannies and men!" is making them look good?
No. 355280
>>355062>>355108can confirm this happened. ex lc admin and cc admin are buddy buddy still, exlc admin came into the discord and convinced cc admin to kick some people from the server she didn't like. That site is always going to be a shitshow if cc admin associates and takes advice from lolcows historically worst admin.
Also never forget cc admin banned spoony for making a jew joke on the site. It's the internet, hun. Toughen up. Youre running an anonymous message board for Christ's sake.
No. 355283
File: 1547670942238.gif (1.69 MB, 640x285, 1543051558580.gif)
>>355268How can you tell if a poster on CC is a man or tranny? Or what gives you that suspicion?
I really haven't noticed anything like that in large numbers. When it happens, their posts are easy enough to ignore.
Nobody answered this either
>>355185 No. 355327
>>355283You can tell that there's a difference in the culture between LC and CC, right? I know LC is majority female because the topics posted here are things that I care about or affect me on a daily basis as a woman. I can't relate to most people on CC when they talk about how they want to join a religious cult or how they think feminism is the devil and #notallmen, things like that are really suspect.
To answer
>>355185, I don't think it's very sweet at all. But they keep pushing these ideas that CC is "comfy" or "welcoming", there was a period where they pushed that very hard and that's probably where the idea comes from. There's a conversation about it here:
https://crystal.cafe/meta/res/546.html No. 355329
>>355321Agreed.
Also I'm thinking a lot of this is just salt because it's not like we haven't had this thread topic before. Happened over the summer too.
It's like someone gets banned/suspects they're been arguing with trannies on cc and then come here wanting everyone to shitpost about it along with them.
Seems to always come to a full circle and I
really don't get it.
No. 355331
>>355327that thread was really embarrassing
>>355329why are you idiots so convinced that everyone ITT actively posts on c.c, most of us don't post there anymore because it's a cesspool.
No. 355333
>>355329Then maybe you should
try to get it and listen to what people are saying? If so many people are posting about the same thing don't you think that there's a possibility that there's some truth to it? Come on, get your fingers out of your ears.
No. 355344
>>355331>>355334Nobody is an idiot just because they disagree with you when you refuse to explain why any of this is a big deal or why we should care. You're awful aggressive.
I don't post on cc and haven't checked it since the last time complaints about trannies leaked here btw.
>>355333>if so many people say the same thing then maybe it's true And?
My point is what are you going to do about it and why should we care as lc posters? It's been a fact that there are trannies going there to larp since the last slapfight about that website happened over the summer, like I explained.
Why do YOU browse and post there if it's so unbearable and you know what you know about the questionable moderation?
Was this just your thread to complain about another chanboard and no one suggesting a solution allowed? Stop browsing there, it's obviously low quality–but you'd have to sacrifice this drama over the penis havers.
No. 355359
>>355356For people who don't really post or lurk cc you complain about the trannies there very aggressively.
How can you even try this with me without seeing your own hypocrisy lmao.
Secondly, how do you know I don't? I think sperging over other websites is pathetic, especially when you try to make this happen multiple times a year.
At least the cc mod drama was interesting, but within a day it's back to complaining about males. Almost as if…you post there and are deeply offended by the fact that the anons you interact with may have a penis.
Either accept it or stay here. The fuck.
No. 355361
the type of users ITT who are "defending the site" are exactly why i won't go back. the users are really superficial and fake and it's shit like this thread that's proving that.
also, lmao at the idea that lolcow has some kind of rivalry with c.c.
>>355356exactly, all the c.c users keep trying to assert that we need to turn the thread into a positive discussion as if we don't actively have threads that just criticize other sites. some of the anons ITT seem nuts.
No. 355366
File: 1547680140960.jpg (78.93 KB, 720x960, 2eek49.jpg)
>>355361I like how the anons who are "defending the site" are just telling you to not browse there. I can't imagine having this much of a delusional complex that you believe people are defending something when they're just suggesting you stop doing something that makes you so very angry.
The website gets barely any traffic as is stands and there are tons of interpersonal threads here to post in. It's not like you're protesting anything by refreshing on cc looking for suspect tranny posts.
No. 355583
File: 1547819858374.png (156.22 KB, 1240x743, ,m .png)
This went on on CC, while Lolcow was dead. Image is too disgusting to show here, but it was a drawing of Pearl from Steven Universe giving Steven a handjob.
Mods deleted the thread, but the fact that someone like that was comfortable enough to post their shit validates at least some of the complaints about the site.
No. 355584
File: 1547819890569.jpeg (389.42 KB, 1226x785, FF1FF238-84AA-4E70-B67C-3B131B…)
>>355576It’s a thread asking about people’s opinions on gay people, it’s exactly what you’d expect: dehumanising.
No. 355585
File: 1547819933192.jpeg (186.71 KB, 1242x696, 74D46F98-56A7-4ADB-946E-1D8DAE…)
>>355584Samefag, but what is up with the dumbass snowflakes they insist on using
No. 355594
>>355584thanks for the screenshots! these two sound so male or mtt. if they're actually female, that's worse. a board full of unbearable 'cool girls' and men. it's sad. i really wanted to like cc and it could've been great.
>>355585this is such an odd post. i can't tell what kind of person this is. i don't know if it's a larper trying to be GC or idk but like another anon said, while there's def a lot of males and troons, i do think the women that visit CC, for the most part, are tradtards that pander to /pol/, which is almost as unbearable as actually sharing a board with men. i really think normalizing and accepting "cool girls" that are eager to objectify and sexualize themselves and other women and act like creepy horndog men makes it all the more difficult to discern when men are posting.
No. 355595
>>355584>>355585miners disgust me. they're like if /g/ anons spent years on r9k, got stockholm syndrome, and never recovered.
also, how are gay men incels? they're the horniest group of people on the planet.
No. 355599
File: 1547821960412.jpeg (574.15 KB, 1242x2090, 78DB5B79-6BD1-405F-90AA-BF8E77…)
>>355585And then there’s this fucking turbo autist.
No. 355607
File: 1547822613464.jpg (37.86 KB, 381x382, ba964e74-5eb2-41ff-8a9d-44abde…)
>>355599>I do not like to see skin or eyeballswtf is any of this post? damn, and I thought we had problems with craynons.
No. 355610
>>355604I’d say that’s clearly a mentally unstable person, honestly my bets are on woman since they seem to see themselves as prey to all these normally sexually functioning people, I mean
>I think all sex is bad >I do not like to see skin or eyeballs >help fuel my escapism They’re clearly just fucked in the head
No. 355623
>>355594>this is such an odd post. i can't tell what kind of person this is. i don't know if it's a larper trying to be GCMy reaction to every second post I read on CC. That place has a very unnatural vibe. It's hard to believe they're really women. This
>>355584 also doesn't sound like something a girl would say or maybe they're just shitposting, who knows.
No. 359793
File: 1548413166694.gif (3.6 MB, 660x370, tea.gif)
>>355675As a lesbian I'm offended by this level of larp. Personally I don't think they're all trannies but a lot are sure retards. Smells like /r9k/ ideology with trickled down /pol/ and old /b/ vibes.
No. 359834
>>355548yeah I was browsing c.c and saw that thread. Read through it all and I was shocked that almost all of them had opinions as shown in
>>355584 and
>>355585It truly confirmed to me that c.c consists of trannies. It's so fucked up how there's threads where miners are saying "what's wrong with being trans? UwU" but no one came in to defend gay people in that fucked up thread. Disgusting. They're truly all scum.
No. 359852
File: 1548428298308.jpg (84.41 KB, 312x321, 1547504008559.jpg)
I still go on cc, but really only check out /hb/, /b/ & /feels/ despite some shit threads. I really can't stand feels because instead of peeps putting their problems in the advice general or tfw no bf thread, they instead make new boards just for their problem. We get it that you boy troubles, but it really floods the page with boy problems. At this point I read the problems just for lols because 99% of it is really pathetic.
The only board that's pretty okay is /hb/. All I do is lurk with the occasional post and report men because cc is thirsty for male attention despite not wanting them.
No. 359861
>>359852I only really check /b/ sometimes but most of the threads there about about relationships and tfw when no bf like you said.
There is so much more to discuss as a woman than just relationship shit and sex shit. I feel like threads here have a bit more diversity.
No. 359952
File: 1548439971465.gif (8.43 MB, 576x324, giphy (1).gif)
I-I liked cc.. I didnt' know it was cancer nor did I know it had shit like
>>355583 I feel really disgusted. I really only stay in the /hb/ and /media/ and sometimes I look through /b/ when I'm really bored. But I never seen any of this. And now I just feel dumb tbh
No. 359962
File: 1548441420710.png (52.6 KB, 1266x580, 1359162044057.png)
>>355280>Also never forget cc admin banned spoony for making a jew joke on the site. Spoony was banned because she was spamming yet another imageboard with thousands of retarded posts and picking fights with people and trying to make yet another imageboard a part of the "Spoony show season 9001 : What is a life?". She's been banned from
every single imageboard she has posted on, to the point where moot himself called her out for it and she is one of the sole reasons as to why drama got banned from /cgl/ in the first place. He even stickied the interaction as an example as to why drama was from then on banned.
I don't buy a thing you're saying just for the fact you're white knighting spoony, the patient zero of cancerous posters.
No. 360058
File: 1548451181367.jpg (3.25 MB, 2976x2976, 1542240106929.jpg)
>>360019Chicken tenders take a lot of effort, actually! At least when you make 'em from scratch. Which I did. Come now.
I was just happy and excited to be making food that he really enjoys (me too) my bad I guess as a woman I can't do that without getting shit on
Pic related is the one I posted. Get mad bitch
No. 360078
>>360065I'll send you some in the mail anon. Express overnite in a hot box
>>360070I guess? It was just a coincidence I ran into the thread on the same day I made them. It's not that deep.
Anyway I'm embarrassed too that I never realized CC was full of men and troons. This is what I get for avoiding 4chan my whole life like the plague… I am naive af apparently
No. 360146
>>360070Tendie anon here. Came back to say on second thought I do understand what you mean.
>>360081Lol I don't think so!
No. 362092
File: 1548687430029.jpg (47.63 KB, 930x502, cc.jpg)
These threads are pathetic
No. 362096
File: 1548688095429.png (707.19 KB, 1351x796, cc.png)
They also take this Stacy vs Fembot bingo seriously.
No. 362161
File: 1548698870661.png (387.04 KB, 1885x843, cringecity.png)
what the fuck is this nonsense?
No. 362290
File: 1548711908551.png (32.24 KB, 300x250, WGyLz8Ogsk-2.png)
>>362164>gather chicken, flour, spices, fryer, wire rack, pan, plate, paper towel, and recipe>cut chicken into small pieces>dry chicken>mix flour and spices in one bowl>mix eggs and hot sauce in another bowl>get deep fryer out, plug it in, turn it on>get pan and wire rack out and set them up>dip chicken piece in egg mixture with one hand, transfer to other hand and dip in flour (you can't use only one hand because you will essentially get balls of dough on your fingertips and waste a ton of ingredients) >repeat above dipping process 2x for each piece for thick batter>place battered chicken onto wire rack>repeat 8 or 9 times, for each chicken piece (dipped 2x each)>cook chicken in 4 rounds for 7 minutes each round >put on plate and paper towel to drain chicken>clean up flour dish, egg dish, knives, and measuring utensils, wipe counters, etc. >enjoy!Most definitely not frozen! In fact the batter was too heavy for my taste bc I double dipped in the egg/flour. And they look greasy bc I literally just pulled them out of the fryer. Try again sweaty
I will admit it was my second time ever making them so they could be better. I've done it twice since then and while I have improved, it's still not perfect!
Here's the r3cipe if you ever wanna stop being a cunt and try things out for yourself anon:
https://www.restlesschipotle.com/copycat-popeyes-chicken-strips/Apologies for posting + deleting this a few times; formatting.
(derailing) No. 365451
>>365435>>365441At least one of the tfw no bf anons is a definite xx woman.
I know her pretty well.
I keep it off of here because you would all call me a sperg or dumb. Which is fair, but I still want to vent my feelings and progress somewhere. Hope that answers something. I'm probably also uglier than the average farmer. No. 366263
>>365445>>365441Holy shit anons I didn't realize that's where I get the familiar vibes from. /lgbt/ is a cesspit.
>>365451nobody cares
No. 383717
File: 1551829822914.png (496.85 KB, 1180x663, Screenshot_2019-03-05 b - Ran…)
I don't know any woman that would unironically say flat chests = children or how being flat chested makes you less of a woman. This either smells like a larp or a robot (possibly self hating female).
No. 383797
>>383717>I don't know any woman that would unironically say flat chests = childrenIn the context of asking why
men don't like flat chests, I would absolutely unironically say this because regardless of how icky and ignorant it is, that is literally what a lot of men think. I've heard them say it. Obviously it's not the only and sole reason to explain men hating on small breasts but men are fucking shitty. Don't shoot the messengers.
No. 384564
File: 1552065315117.png (86.31 KB, 1405x191, Skärmavbild 2019-03-08 kl. 18…)
>defending literal incels
yikes
No. 384574
>>384564The Response:
>I actually feel bad for the guys. Asian men unironically are given a lot more shit for being "feminine" than other races, and every asian girl I've met wants a white bf. There's a lot of entitlement on r/asianmasculinity in regards to women, but they actually have reason to complain unlike 90% of the manosphere.Women complaining = the worst
Asian men complaining = They have a reason!1!1
No. 384789
File: 1552125063132.jpg (39.76 KB, 400x392, 67gw4j1qg3flfo1_400.jpg)
>>384564>defending r/asianmasculinity HA they definitely deserved to be permabanned
No. 385399
File: 1552300032329.png (340.56 KB, 800x487, Screenshot_2019-03-09-20-19-22…)
>>354915Posted a couple of days ago.
No. 385782
File: 1552377164376.jpg (508.48 KB, 3264x2448, oSfhq3Z.jpg)
Found this on /r9k/ in a post where a robot claimed a farmer sent him a valentine card and that she was a mod but because robots typically confuse the two boards I did some digging and I was wondering if this was the crystal cafe mod sending shit to some robot named nick.
If you look back to the discussion of townhall-gate before this thread was created you will find strange WK'ing posts from an anon about the whole situation (crystal anon?).
Anyways this is just pathetic.
No. 385784
Possible ex/crystal anon
>>354978>But I can confirm that one of the mods acted really unprofessional by giving my ip (he was able to guess which posts were mine) to her /r9k/ bf whom I ghosted. Nothing bad happened, but I was really scared when I heard about it.Also yeah, mods left.
Comparing this to another recap in /g/
>>354918>said boyfriend was from r9k and they "met" during an r9k raid of CC and she openly bragged about it on the site >a mod left over this, some users were upset by thatSo how would this anon be able to confirm strange details if they weren't possibly a mod? Excuse my nancy drew autism but finding this thread on the desu archive spooked me.
No. 385831
>>385399They posted the same thing at cc but switched out to say lolcow was picking a fight (and calling them handmaidens or something lmao).
Just a robot trying to make us fight I guess? But the boards already hate each other so he's too late.
No. 385854
File: 1552397797514.jpg (42.31 KB, 640x657, IMG_20181210_054554.jpg)
>>384574>Asian men unironically are given a lot more shit for being "feminine" than other racesTbf it is a dumb stereotype but it annoys the fuck out of me whenever people whine about not fitting the "masculine" or "feminine" role because it doesn't even matter at all. Just be a fucking human being.
>>384564>i dont give a shit about sjw issues but idk why this one seemed especially low for meSo shit like sexual harrassment or unarmed black people getting shot by the police is dandy but men bitching and moaning about meaningless social contructs is like such a srsly srs issue, guise!!1!!
Lol what a fucking dumbass, no wonder they were banned. Good riddance.
>>385782>I suppose so, now let me orbit Uranus. Please god, I hope this doesn't mean what I think it does.
No. 385968
File: 1552417699603.png (Spoiler Image,195.84 KB, 268x277, berp.png)
>let me orbit Uranus
But then who was orbit
No. 386144
>>385820my dumbass never posted the archive but here is the full thread
https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/51107885/my skepticism comes from the fact robots confuse the two boards all the time and we currently only know of one retarded moderator thirsty enough to settle for a robot
I do really think ex crystal mod was posting in this thread kek
No. 386174
>>385782This is why I'd never be caught dead doing anything nice for a 4chan denizen.
Assuming this is a woman I'm kind of mad at you anons for dragging this person through the mud when it's just a nice gesture towards someone who was an undeserving asshole. Oh gosh, a cringy comment in the card? It's as if the person who wrote that didn't expect it to be put on blast on the internet.
>inb4 whiteknightI'm fucking bothered about this, it's sad when thoughtful people are the ones who catch shit.
No. 386184
>>386178It's a dumb comment in a card someone sent along with what appears to be some kind of care package. Maybe people would be more selective in what they write if they knew there was a chance of it being posted on the internet.
Meanwhile the robot in question was an ass, infiltrated a website(?), and then shitposted a woman who was kind to him.
This is what you choose to go after a woman for?
Not the fact that she violated her moderation powers and abetted a robot onto a female website?
A gift out of goodwill and a corny ass line in a card is what rustles your bustles.
No. 386191
>>386184You're missing the point, it is the fact she violated her moderation powers. The only reason we know this cringe card was probably sent by her was because of the information we have from the townhall.
It must be such a kind gesture to fall in wubb with a robot who raided a board, please.
No. 386266
>>386230>you're making fun of something she said in confidence. So what if they are? We can't have a giggle at something silly on the internet? It's not revenge porn or doxxing, ffs.
Did you send that card or something? Maybe don't befriend shitty robots who will put you on blast in 4chan threads to brag that "a real girl" actually cares about them. Your neckbeard orbiting card was cringy, let it go.
>You're being assclowns, and totally unreasonable.??? Do you even know where you are?
No. 386267
>>386230It was posted as proof of collusion though, it's a bit tinfoil but I did actually link reasons it is totally possible. Stop being so worked up I stumbled upon some cringe on the desu archive.
>>386264kek
No. 386275
>>386266I have a problem with a woman doing something nice for a scumbag, yet somehow the scumbag is less worthy of criticism.
>b-but she tried to befriend a robot So what. Lots of women try to negotiate with shit men, it doesn't make them the innately shitty ones.
>Do you even know where you are?Okay so you wanna slam this quip over to this poster
>>386198 who first accused me of being unreasonable? No? Oh right, because I'm the target because I said boo and the double standard applies huh.
No. 386281
>>386275The scumbag is a walking self-criticism. What can we even say about him? "He's a robot" is enough to settle the score. All of us know what that entails, the same way that if you see a person happily eating dog shit, inhaling it and rubbing it all over their body, you don't write an essay on why the dog shit alone is disgusting. We all know. The real point of shock is that someone would make such close contact with animal faeces on purpose.
It's embarrassing and cringy to associate yourself with such an individual to the point that you literally send them a whole care package and called yourself their orbiter, end of.
No one said the cringeanon is innately a horrible, shitty person that deserves to die in a fire or be murdered by incels for her robot-befriending crimes, holy fuck. All anyone has said is that this shit is embarrassing, and she should be embarrassed. Also, it was hypothesized that she was the same pick-me mod who let her /r9k/ bf run free range on CC and shit up the site. I wouldn't be surprised if it was her, because their actions have the same energy.
tl;dr: Suck it up, we don't always have to be lovelies.
No. 386290
>>355585>>355584come on i made these posts on crystal.cafe and i was just shooting the shit. we can't have fun on image boards anymore? yes, i'm a girl. obviously homosexual women are real. yes flamboyant gay men in real life make me uncomfortable. yes i do actually like yaoi. yes i don't agree that transpeople can change gender or w.e. and I don't want men in dresses in my private spaces.
taking imageboard shit seriously cmon
No. 386293
File: 1552494487129.gif (1.98 MB, 304x226, 1544551525209.gif)
>>386281>>386198Haha, jesus, you farmers are on fire today.
This is why LC is such a gem, honestly. You rarely see such wit or nuance on imageboards.
No. 386312
>>386281>the real shock is that someone would make contact with a robot It's not.
And the fact that you will lurk r9k and sift through archives proves that you're at least familiar with the interactions and how that board functions.
I don't know who you think you're bullshitting with this.
>embarrassing and cringy to associate yourself with such an individual to the point that you literally send them a whole care package and called yourself their orbiter Nobody would know or care if the robot in question didn't flee to r9k to humblebrag and take a picture of what's probably the only card he's ever gotten.
>Also, it was hypothesized that she was the same pick-me mod who let her /r9k/ bf run free range on CC and shit up the site. It's been got, for the billionth time.
I have a problem with you being bitchy. I'm not a lovely either and have a difference in opinion about your behavior. Don't like it? Feel justified? Then don't reply.
>>386294Gonna "Hi cow" me next? You wish.
No. 386316
>>386312>it's not.It's only not shocking or gross to people who are personally into such things.
This is not a space for that kind of person, and if you find those activities good or interesting, perhaps you should go and surround yourself with your own kind.
I wasn't even the one who lurks /r9k/ or found any of that, but tell yourself whatever you want. Even if anons here lurk to get their daily dose of disillusionment with humanity and/or the male gender, it's nowhere near as pitiful as spending actual currency on one of those dregs, getting them gifts, declaring yourself their orbiter and expressing a desire to peg them, lmao.
>Nobody would know or care if the robot in question didn't flee to r9k to humblebrag and take a picture of what's probably the only card he's ever gotten.Doesn't change that it's fucking cringy for even a fraction of a second.
Go ahead and orbit some more robots and their anuses, anon. We'll keep laughing as your cringy letters and potentially even cringier DMs are discovered, don't worry. We know this attention is important to you.
No. 386320
>>386315You have a severe mental problem and I suggest you go back to your degenerate weeniehut site.
If you seriously cannot believe that there are multiple farmers that find you unbearably cringey and retarded, you are beyond redemption.
I've barely posted in this thread and I also don't care enough to follow your desperate attempts at wooing an inbred manchild with a lame card, but where there's good humor, there's good humor.
No. 386321
>>386316It's really not shocking or gross. Simply put. I'm surprised anyone from any kind of chan site would even be so sensitive considering we have penpal and gift exchange threads all the damn time.
We don't know what he may or may not have told her. Obviously it convinced her that he wasn't "not like the other robots~" and it worked.
Honestly while I've never orbited a robot I have been tricked into doing something nice for what turned out to be a scum. You're being a bit too mad about this but it's whatever.
I'm not her, I don't really browse crystal, and I had no other dog in this race other than to pop in and say maybe you should fucking chill.
>>386317You can put down the "Hi Cow" narrative any time. I'm not the rogue mod and I insist on that. What the fuck would she even have to lose coming on here anyway? Anonymous face? I think that's been lost regardless.
No. 386328
>>386321>You're being a bit too mad about this>I had no other dog in this raceYeah, everyone else is mad and you have no personal stakes in this. That's why you're being aggressive and have been arguing about this with multiple anons for hours.
We're all laughing at this cringy card, and it brings us entertainment and humor in the form of pity/disgust. Because it's cringy.
If you can't handle that, this is the wrong thread (and possibly entire website) for you. Cope.
No. 386329
>>386322NTA (again), but it's clearly a very, very big deal to you, and that's why you're reeeing at everyone for having a giggle on an imageboard at some anonymous, self-proclaimed robot anal orbiter's expense.
>You're making ME cringe.You're making the whole thread cringe.
No. 386357
File: 1552509285279.gif (307.04 KB, 263x200, 200.gif)
>>386281>All of us know what that entails, the same way that if you see a person happily eating dog shit, inhaling it and rubbing it all over their body, you don't write an essay on why the dog shit alone is disgusting. We all know. The real point of shock is that someone would make such close contact with animal faeces on purpose. I was going to respond but this a perfect analogy. If card-anon is so asshurt over light criticism, maybe stop being naive and make better choices. It's called personal growth. Lol.
No. 386383
>>386328>y-you're aggressive That's real funny coming from the same people who started to sperg out the second someone disagreed with the circlejerk.
I just matched the tone that was being given, don't point fingers. So what's your invested "stake"? I just commented because it was on the front of ot.
>>386329>a big big dealI think you girls need to stop projecting. Casually responding to your tantruming every half hour, when I check on my mobile, isn't building up to be a big deal. Just look at this poster
>>386357 throwing down gifs and pretending they aren't blasted.
Did y'all have fun acting unhinged? Will you recover from my opinion?
No. 386401
>>386383>>386394You're foaming at the mouth, holy crap. Just do better. Stop sending Valentine's packages and cards covered with Hello Kitty stickers to incels. Stop writing embarrassing little love notes for them. Learn from this mishap, learn from the loser robot who betrayed your trust to brag to strangers, and maybe learn to laugh at yourself along the way. No one has seen your face, we don't know who you are, and absolutely nobody will be analyzing your handwriting to spot you on later occasions as long as you don't fuck up in literally the same way again. You can easily put this shit behind you.
You can go "W-Wasn't me! Stop "Hi cow"-ing! You're just projecting! You're the ones throwing tantrums! Having a thread criticizing CC is just as bad!" for as long as you want, but that won't help you or convince anybody at this point. Only the person who sent the card in the first place, or does similar things, could possibly be so offended by this. We'll just keep laughing at this mess, and even more anons who would've otherwise ignored this while scrolling will see this shit, click the thread to find out what the whole shitstorm is about, and join the chorus of laughter at the cringy card. Only a long look in the mirror and a personal decision to do better will make it all go away. Just take the L.
No. 386402
>>386395And one person can disagree with you.
Should I assume everyone reeeing over cc got banned and has some personal vendetta hence what seems to be extra salt.
>learn from your mistakes What mistake you daffy fudd? I'm not card anon. I never orbited a robot. I still don't think giving some robot a box of stuff and a card is equivalent to "inhaling shit" but apparently I'm the one with the "mental issues." The shit you say when you're rabid lmao.
No. 386404
>>386402>I still don't think giving some robot a box of stuff and a card is equivalent to "inhaling shit" but apparently I'm the one with the "mental issues." If we're talking about orbiting anuses, then yes, you very well may be literally inhaling shit.
Go find a shit-huffing addicts anonymous site already.
No. 386405
>>386401Look at this Nancy Drew caricature completely unraveling herself. Save yourself the keystrokes. I'm not her.
I really don't care what you're "convinced" of, if you wanna keep throwing accusations it's no real effort on my end to throw em back.
I eagerly await your next novel tier response.
No. 386406
>>386395>>386401They think we're blasted about their weird wk'ing opinion. We're
laughing at it and we're also laughing at the person who sent the card.
>>386403Also stop fingerpointing at all the anons, I'm the one who found the post lol I don't care what you think stay mad bistro bitch
Also how can we all be banned from CC when they don't even have proper moderation lmfao
No. 386410
>>386406I'm kind of laughing back at this point because of your ridiculous finger pointing and fetish tier comparisons.
Maybe you and the orbit chan have more in common than you realize, you both love talking scat.
No. 386411
File: 1552519700332.jpg (133.41 KB, 572x845, Eggman.jpg)
>>386407>You're still the ones who think sending a box and a card is like huffing and rubbing shit on yourselves.To men that look like this and spend their lives hating on women? Yes, it kind of is, lol.
No. 386419
>>386416That has nothing to do with the fact that someone made a post comparing sending cards and boxes to a robot like seeing someone huff and rub dog shit on themselves, and other anons thinking that's a brilliant comparison.
The fuck is wrong with you.
No. 386421
>>386419You said it was that anon specifically
>>386406 who said it and accused them of loving to "talk scat". Keep up.
No. 386428
>>386425Can I have a bite of yours?
>>386426>your fantasies …I have no clue what you're on about. Aren't you exhausted of this yet? Wind down.
No. 386431
>>386428Stop sperging.
Everyone else stop derailing.
No. 387351
File: 1552753378114.png (356.05 KB, 800x501, Screenshot_2019-03-09-22-30-33…)
Anyone see this? CC users get so butthurt
No. 387352
File: 1552753862076.jpeg (791.89 KB, 1300x800, nice try.jpeg)
>>387351More like robots trying to start shit.
Top was on cc.
No. 387388
>>387351Yeah. I saw it when I screenshot it and posted it
>>385399.
No. 387590
File: 1552806475510.png (442.57 KB, 1835x846, wtf.PNG)
>pic related
>tfw robots and incels keep sneaking onto your board, but you're either too stupid to notice or one of them
Feels like if the userbase from pull decided to make their own chan board.
They try to understand what board culture is but, only lurk on /s4s/ (for le funneh maymays) or the boards that anon in pic mentioned.
No. 387635
File: 1552815412991.png (169.57 KB, 500x730, lmao at ur life.png)
Imagine being OP and being this obsessed about a dead site.
No. 398282
File: 1555179910252.png (61.63 KB, 2224x172, cc.png)
Since this is CC, I wasn't sure whether or not this was to be taken as some maleposter mocking women, or a pick-me committing an embarrassing "haha so ironic" self-drag. Either way, cringe.
I kind of like CC, but sometimes I need to come back to LC, because the bullshit that flies there can be too much.